The URL can be used to link to this page

04 24 2002 COW Agenda ,.' -r , ~ ... ~ .. "" . . TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING AGENDA DATE: WEDNESDAY, APRIL 24,2002 TIME: 9:00 a.m. COUNCIL CHAMBERS ************************************************************************************************ 1. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA 2. DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST AND THE GENERAL NATURE THEREOF: - "IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ACT" 3. RECEIPT OF ACCOUNTS: a) Statement of Accounts for the month of March, 2002, 4. DEPUTATIONS: a) 9:00 a.m. Mr. Jack Haggerty, Horseshoe Valley Property Owners' Association, re: recreation recommendations, b) 9:15a.m. Ms. Mary Baxter, representative for residents' group re: Pod's Lane Playground, c) 9:30 a.m, Ms. Julie Scott, Innovative Perspectives, re: Parkland Secondary Study, (Council: Please bring your copy of the study to the meeting.) 5. CORRESPONDENCE: a) Barrie Public Library, minutes of Board meeting held on February 28, 2002. b} Oro-Medonte History Committee re: acquiring a local artifact. c} County of Simcoe, Report No, CO 02-007 re: City of Barrie's decision to proceed unilaterally with 911 CERB, A copy of County of Simcoe's Report No, CO 02-007 is available in the Clerk's office for review, i" .. 't .,. '1 d) Orillia Public Library, 2001 Annual Report, A copy of Orillia Public Library's 2001 Annual Report is available in the Clerk's office for review, e) Ellwood McLaughlin, correspondence re: road conditions on Line 14 North. 6. FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND FIRE: a) Fire Report No. 2002-06, Paul Eenhoorn, Fire Chief, re: monthly fire report for March, 2002, b) Chris Carter, Recreation Co-ordinator, report re: March break recreation programs (to be distributed under separate cover). . 4IJ c) Minutes of the Recreation Advisory Committee meeting held on April 18, 2002, 7. PUBLIC WORKS: a} Report No. ES2002-29, Keith Mathieson, Director of Engineering and Environmental Services, re: Heidi's R.V. Sales, Site Plan Agreement, pt. W % Lot 20, Conc, 11 (formerly Township of Oro), being Part 1, 51 R-30235, being all of PIN #58547-0129 (Lt). b) Report No, PWS2002-04, Jerry Ball, Public Works Superintendent, re: tender contracts as follows: PWS2002-02 PWS2002-03 PWS2002-04 PWS2002-05 PWS2002-06 PWS2002-08 PWS2002-09 PWS2002-10 (to be distributed under separate cover), 8. PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT: Calcium Chloride Gravel Resurfacing Surface Treatment Slurry Seal Winter Sand Snow Removal for Winter Seasons of 2002-2003, 2003-2004 and 2004-2005 2002 Model Tandem Cab and Chassis Truck Snow Plow Equipment -< .... a) Report No. PD2002-20, Andria Leigh, Township Planner, re: Committee of Adjustment decisions for April 11, 2002, 2 ~ ...... t 9. COMMUNITY SERVICE: Nil. 1 O. ENVIRONMENTAL TASK FORCE: Nil. 11. ADDENDUM: 12. IN-CAMERA: Nil. 3 "'t -/1 t I , T Parkland Secondary Study Reply to written submissions received at Public Meeting of February 21,2002 and reviewed by Julie Scott (Innovative Perspectives) and municipal staff. The intent, purpose and/or perspective of the Parkland Secondary Study was to conduct a comprehensive review of existing parkland to determine the nature and location of future parkland in the township. Goals, objectives, policy and procedural criteria and recommendations were to be developed which would guide Council and staff for the next 10 years and beyond, . The study was based on The Terms of Reference as approved by Council, with specific direction from the Objectives on pages 6-7 of Phase 1 . The Goals, Objectives and Priorities were identified through the public process that was set out by the steering committee pages 66-68 Phase 1 and page 2 Analysis . Policy and procedural criteria was set out in the recommendations Need for Policy: Policy vs "statement of intent" and "general principles" . As noted during the public meeting, the municipality already has written policies and "common knowledge" policies (not written) that should be the basis for all policy development . Policies are required to guide Council in their decision process . Policies are required to direct staff with the day to day management of parkland (which would include maintenance standards developed through the criteria set out on page 15 of the Recommendations) . Policies ensure the fair, equitable and cost effective delivery of services . Policies are also required to assist and guide Parks and Recreation partners, volunteers and committees that work with the municipality. This was covered under recommendations regarding partnerships on page 4, Therefore, the study agrees with the statement made during the public meeting, referring to the need for policy and process so that the community understands what to expect (for example) with regard to maintenance and the designated use of municipal parkland, Application of Evolutionary Change This study was to provide a "snap shot" of the current use of parkland, Historical data has identified some parkland that will require evolutionary change and this process will be applied on a "site specific" basis, An example of this would be Guthrie Soccer Field (map M33). It was previously used as a soccer field, but is no longer used for this purpose due to the growth of the Oro-Medonte Minor Soccer league and a partnership (between the Township and a private provider) that allows the league to accommodate their numbers and scheduling demands, As a result of the change in use of this parkland, site specific analysis and monitoring will be needed to determine its future use. The criteria for this process is detailed on page 8 of the Recommendations. 1 it ) ~ .I j r J '" Demographics Some concerns were expressed regarding growth in Oro-Medonte and how the report does not adequately reflect this impact by using out dated figures, Specific mention was made of additions and new construction of school facilities, · The1996 Census population figures were used, as they were determined to be the only accurate source of information available. Although the, overall population figures have been released for 2001 Census, the breakdown by sex and age will not be available until July of this year. · Upon checking with the Simcoe County District School Board and Simcoe Muskoka Catholic District School Board for clarification of additions and new facilities within the Township, the following was noted: 1. No new schools have been built by the Public School Board in the last five years and Notre Dame was built and occupied in 1994, 2, Both Catholic and Public School Boards are monitoring the Craighurst Secondary Study to determine the need for schools, but only the Catholic Board has made a request for designation of property. This request has not been addressed yet, and there are no plans to build. There are no additional plans for new schools by either school board beyond this area of the Township. 3. The Public School Board has put additions on three schools in the past year. They are Guthrie, W.R. Best and Warminster, These additions were to replace the portable units, This year the portables will also be replaced at East Oro School. In all cases, these additions do not allow for increased capacity, but only reduce the number of portables. The Catholic School Board does not plan to add to Notre Dame. The most current (and accurate) demographic information should be used when this study is reviewed in the future. However, parkland should be developed with all age groups in mind, As addressed throughout the recommendations, parkland development should be based on the need, community partnerships, future trends and demographics. Ice Time and Arena Usage As recommended on pages 8-9 of the Recommendations, the issue of facility usage should be monitored and, if there is a need to increase, the criteria set out on page 9 will provide a basis for the gathering of more information. · With regard to concerns expressed about the report not adequately reflecting the demands on ice time; the information used on page 41 of Phase 1 is current and includes 2002 figures. · The Oro-Medonte Minor Hockey League (Ettie Mountain, Scheduler) has been contacted and she has assured staff that if the league considers their program to be "at risk" at any time (with regard to ice availability) they will advise staff accordingly. 2 4- c') 3 I (~ f 1 Government Policy With respect to concerns regarding Government Policy not being referenced; Provincial Guidelines set out for parkland were addressed on pages 43-44 of Phase 1 , Early Years Report (specifically "programming for children six and under and the needs of parents with young children") These concerns relate to programming, not the land, This study and its recommendations refer to land use, which in turn provides program opportunities, Terminology Concerns were expressed regarding the need for clarification of the following terms that were used within the study: . Centrally located - refers to an agreed upon location (e.g. parkland development) which would be determined by the nature of the project . Affordability - is a term chosen and used in the categories set out by the steering committee and public process (pages 66-68 Phase 1), From an administrative perspective, it would address the ROI (return on investment) or a cost benefit analysis, . User Fees - are established by council through bylaw, and not to be confused with non-resident user fees, Horseshoe Valley Property Owners Association This association favours the study and sees the benefits of partnering with the Township in the development of parkland in their area, These comments have addressed the concerns of those attending and making submissions during the public meeting on Feb 21/02. In addition, the following formatting corrections have been made: . Page 2 - Analysis (bottom of page) text should read Survey Summaries: Phase 2 pages 30 - 59 . Page 16 - Recommendations. Components should be listed as follows: Open Space Partnerships Preservation and Protection Free Standing (Self Sufficient) Multi-Function Facilities Naturalization Affordable and Accessible Wide Variety F utu re Growth Maintenance It is the recommended that the Parkland Secondary Study be submitted to Council for approval with the endorsement of the Recreation Advisory Committee, 3 . ~....., ,f LfC.)Lf -.' Township of Oro..Medonte Public Meeting Thursday, February 21,2002 7:00 p.m. Parkland Secondary Study Present: Mayor Ian Beard Deputy Mayor Neil Craig Councillor Paul Marshall Councillor Harry Hughes Councillor Ruth Fountain Staff Present: Jennifer Zieleniewski, CAO Marilyn Pennycook, Clerk Chris Carter, Recreation Coordinator Joe Casey, Deputy Fire Chief Also Present: D, Knox, Rec. Advisory Committee Julie Scott, Innovative Perspectives Wilf McMechan, Steffie Steinke, C, Hughes, Glen Taber, Ray Collins, Brenda Collins, Linda Northcott, Howie Rogers Mayor Beard called the meeting to order. Julie Scott presented a summary of the Parkland Study Recommendations as prepared in the January 23, 2002 draft "Township of Oro-Medonte Parkland Secondary Study", Written submissions were received from: Councillor Harry Hughes Doug Wilson Glen Taber, Horseshoe Valley Property Owners Assoc. 4C i21 , j "'" \.../" .- I r' ...... , 1 The fol1owing is a summary of the verbal comments from the meeting: Neil Craig - In a couple of sections we've talked about open space and natural area and I'm just wondering are you or will you will be making recommendations on the amount of maintenance or what we need to do to have these areas in a way that the people can enjoy them but that really we're not altering them too much, I'm thinking we have some parks that are a natural area but people may want grass cut or sometimes you get into a wooded area and they want the dead trees cleared away so they can walk around. Is there a definition of what" . sort of maintenance or how we take a natural area and turn it into an open space area? Julie - We addressed that to some degree under maintenance and naturalization, Harry Hughes - concerned that things that needed to be acted on right away not be delayed until a policy has been set up, Jennifer Zieleniewski. - There is a policy in place now and all this new policy would do would enhance the existing policy, Neil Craig - We had a park down near the lake that the grass had traditionally been cut in it and then as a money saving exercise as well as naturalization, it was left uncut and the residents objections to that because they seemed to wan the grass cut. They thought it looked shabby not being cut. We may have to develop policy but it may be difficult to change people's perception if a park has always been maintained in a certain way and we decide to change it to a more natural state, . Mayor - Suggests that on the natural parks, a sign be posted at the entrance s that people know that it is a "natural state park" so they would know why the ~ - grass isn't cut. Ray Collins - The park under discussion is Shelswell Park and the most voiceiferous complaints came from me and my wife about this park because it was left to get extremely long. It was an extremely dry summer last year and U" park is very close to housing. People were actually coming out of the major cit: just down south of us and dumping rubbish in that park, Whether it's declared natural area or not does induce people to come and ditch their rubbish becaus~ .,... I{c.)t:, -, they have to pay more in Barrie to get more rubbish carried away and if they car come to Oro and just throw it in the park because the park doesn't appear to be maintained, we are creating a problem, Julie - We need to address the whole concept of what we consider to be 'monitoring' of parkland. For example, Shelswell is listed as Open Space Parkland so there was considered to be some trimming of grass but not to the same degree as to a playground or at Memorial Park. R. Collins - There was some degree of maintenance after we complained to Councillor Harry Hughes, B. Collins - It's a very well used park. Families take their children there to play and go on the beach. There's so few places on the Lakeshore where you can take young families to the beach, Most of the Lakeshore is owned by private people, It's just not the place to have a Natural Parkland, There had been a wedding there the previous year but not last year since it was too unkept. They would have circulated a petition to neighbours to have it cleaned up. S. Steinke - I have a question regards to the policy, It was mentioned that we have policies already in place, Is it not better to have the existing policies amended rather than taking ages to complete new policies? Julie - assured her that things are now being done according to existing policy but they may not necessarily all be written down policy and that's what we want to change, S. Steinke- How are the small pieces of land (lot size) that have been dedicate as parkland in subdivisions going to be delt with? W. Me Meehan - When we say there is no surplus parkland, how come Counci is in the process of selling waterfront parkland? Julie - these are restricted lands which are not part of this study, Jennifer Zieleniewski- confirmed that restricted parkland is recreational land that is for the exclusive use of certain people, not the public, due to restricted covenants on the title of that land, 4c )7 r . . ( , , Mavor confirmed the Council is not interested in using Township money on the restricted lands because it is not used by all the Township residents, S. Steinke - says something about 'what it will cost and at the time was absolutely out of the question, Julie agreed that it's a matter of filling the gap, Harry Hu~hes - This is the area I think that you haven't got a policy recommendation that seems to be a concern, We have classifications. We hav€~ maintenance standards but we don't seem to have a process as to declare who and how those things are declared and what involvement the community might have in deciding what standards are involved with parks and I'm wondering is that something you feel is already in place or is it something you feel isn't needed, Julie - I think we addressed that in one form or another where we're talking about review and monitoring inspection procedures and whether the Township or community would provide full or partial monitoring at the property, costing of that throughout the whole study, That may not directly address what you're saying, Throughout the whole process, we've said that as far as enhancing the further development of parkland is concerned, any changes to thE way the parkland is being maintained, there would have to be some degree of consultation with people that are in that area, However, there also has to be consistency of application, You can't have one park being cut three times a week and another park at the same level of development, getting cut once a week, And that's why I'm proposing the whole region around costing and how t< go about it. Harry Hu~hes- I think that whole issue is probably one of the really important things to the community, particularly people around parks and I really think t~en needs to be a process spelled out in writing. . Julie - Is there a specific language that you would like to put to that? Harry Hu~hes - You have gotten at that indirectly and I think it needs to be gotten at directly. That spells out what the process of how the consultation process and how the park will end up being designated and possible over time, there are times that usage changes in parks, And sometimes there's a process needed for changing those designations, . .... . \ 4c.)8' Julie - I think that it is addressed in one form or another but it may not be totally addressed to your favour so we'll go back and address that and make sure of it. Mavor -That's what this meeting is for. Its for consultation to try to find out if we've got something wrong in any way and how to fix it and obviously there's going to be things we can and can't do, S. Steinke - We always trespass through private property to reach Copeland and there's a lot of other people just going through private property, There are hundreds of people going there and that's worthwhile competing into it. Why.".. Julie - There are trails available that are not known, For example the Ganaraska trail goes through a lot of private properties and it has the right to do that. But what we found out when we were trying to mark that trail on the map is that it can change from year to year which indicates to me that the trail goes through the property of others, Jennifer Zieleniewski - I don't know how many people in the audience have met our new Recreation Coordinator, Chris Carter. One of his departmental goals to meet the corporate goal is to look at linkage between all these trails to come up with a five and ten year strategy to make that happen for the community. It just seems our community is into walking and loves nature. Paul Marshall - Access to Copeland forest can be made without going across private property, at the very end of Pine Ridge Trail. The parking area and the paved area at the end of Pine Ridge Trail abuts directly on to Copeland forest property and the walkway goes down to the little ravine. Sf' Steiner - The actual trail is not very convenience to walk and it goes through the ski resort and its all down hill and so people take the shorter way through private since it is much nicer. Jennifer Zieleniewski - Signage could help that problem. Wilf McMeechan - I wondered what the status of the private parkland is. Can that be developed? Julie - Some of it is accessible to the public for a cost and some of it is strictly private, ...,. I.. J 1 '- f - , . Neil Craig- Just because it is private parkland they cannot just do anything they want. It is covered by other jurisdictions, Glen Taber - Horseshoe Valley Property Owners Association. Follows the written submission, S. Steinke - We should think about the children we have in our area. It used to be actually an old age residential area and it has changed drastically and it should be a priority to think about the needs of children, Harry Hughes - The report, when it was written, looked at the demographics of the area and I think that when you look across Ontario, the demographics in this area, because of the drastic growth is a lot different in Ontario and from having been a school principal in Oro-Medonte and in looking at the additions that have gone on schools and even the new schools that have been built and I expect plans in the future, its telling us what a large section of our population coming along are children so development of parkland close to homes and residential areas is important but also looking at the facilities that are being used by everyone, such as the arena and I believe when this report was written there wasn't pressure on the arena like there is today. I know Minor hockey right now is looking at having to cap programs so I think perhaps other than just the monitoring notion of that there needs to be a little more looking at that, in particular looking at the whole report in terms of the number of children. Mavor adjourned meeting at 8:30 p.m, A tape of the meeting is available in the Clerk's office, ) ~ c. ) JO ~ _ , , .. -I DRAFT PARKLAND SECONDARY STUDY February 21,2002 I apologize for not forwarding this information earlier. It was necessary that I read this report more than once to be able to articulate my impressions and to provide feed back. The Parkland Secondary Study appears to be of limited value for the practical perspective in it being used to establish future directions. The basis for the extensive recommendations appear to be the result of questionnaires that asked what people wanted without prioritizing options, As a result, the report comes across as a wish list that includes information that is generally already known without sufficient consideration for the need to prioritize recommendations in a manner that gets the best results fTom available resources. There are numerous recommendations that relate to the development of Policy. There is a need to give greater consideration to the practicality of Policy Development in relation to costs, the time involved and the need for ongoing revisions to respond to new information and changing . needs. Although Policies are written with the intent of assisting, there is frustration down side with barriers and delays that are often realized when volunteers or prospective partners have a unique situation or a window of opportunity. Instead of developing Policies the community would be better served with statements of intent and a list of general principles that leaves the door open for agreements with volunteers and community partners. This would enable responding without the cumbersome process of Policy Revision and would better enable a process that better recognizes the participation of stakeholders. There is an absence of an overall perspective that ties the recommendations together in relation to what the Township is attempting to do. This statement should inc1ude historical and evolutionary changes that have occurred and why what has been in place needs to be changed. The report appears to be already out of date in some areas and is based on demographic information that does not adequately recognize the growing population and the significant increase in the number of children in Oro-Medonte. There have been additions to most schools inc1uding one new school being built with plans for more. The report does not adequately reflect the demands on ice time and that minor sports programs are facing the possibility of capping numbers. The report also appears to overlook the new facilities that have been built on schools and the potential for partnerships in that area. The report appears to overlook the needs of families as a whole when it comes to recreation and its impact on facilities. (The soccer programs are popular because it recognizes and addresses these needs.) The report does not reflect recent changes to Government Policy and current research. There is no mention of the Early Years Report and its findings as it relates to programming for children six and under and the needs of parents with young children. Some terminology in the report needs to be defined. The definition of terms such as, "centrally located", "affordability" and <'"user fees" are critical for interpretation of the recommendation~; Hopefully this information wilJ be beneficial in further revisions to the Draft Parkland Study. Harry Hughes Councillor Ward 4 Oro-Medonte ,. '- J . , 'f '{! February 21,2002 A PRESENTATION BY THE HORSESHOE VALLEY PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCiATION (H.V.P .O.A.) ON BEHALF OF OUR COMMUNITY, TO THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE IN REGARD TO THE DRAFT PARKlAND STUDY, DATED JANUARY 23,2002 PURPOSE: To offer our observations from a review of the Study, with particular reference to .Phase 4 - Recommendations. regarding recreational facilities in our area and to support the recommendation of a .community partnership. with the municipality as the process evolves. OBSERVATIONS: 1. The Township believes in ensuring ....residents can access recreational services and facilities closest to them..... 2. The Study indicates a significant preference for the area north of Hwy 11, and the potential inclusion of multi-use outdoor facilities. 3. No facilities exist in the immediate area between Prices Corners and Cralghurst, with the exception of those provided at Horseshoe Valley Resort. 4. Interest has been expressed for multi-use facilities in the Craighurst and Coldwater areas. 5, Reference is made to the potential of the Fire hall site on Line 4 N. in the Horseshoe Valley area. OUR POSmON: 1 . We are the largest single and fastest growing population concentration in the Township, with approximately 16,000 persons living in our community, (including the addition of nearly 600 new homes in the near future). This represents nearly 15% of the population In the area. 2. As outlined in JaCK Haggerty's presentation to the Township of Oro-Medonte In September of 1999, we believe that our community would be well-served by the provision of multi-use facilities such as a parK,'playfield, sKating rink, etc. 3. We generally support the Study and its recommendations, particularily as It pays attention to the Horseshoe Valley area, and while we do not speak for all of the residents in our community, we do represent about 70%, who are the members of the H.V.P.O.A. . ..... , , 4c.)t~ , ; SUMMARY: Given the concentration of families In our area, the desire for, but lock of, recreational facilities between Prices Corners and Croighurst, we generally support the Study and welcome the opportuni1y of a -partnership. between the municipality and the community at Horseshoe Volley as the process evotves, whereby such facilities may be realized, preferably on the Fire hall site on Une 4 N. Thank you for allowing us the opportunity to speak In support of the Study. Glen Taber, H.V.P.OA 34 Birch Grove, Horseshoe Valley, 705-835-3351 , Lf~ J Iv . ( , , From: Doug Wilson 2310 Highway #11 (Village of Guthrie) Shanty Bay Ontario, 487-2716 Re: Input for the Draft Parkland Secondary Study The Parkland Secondary Study does not appear to address issues that during the past year has become a concern of a number of people living in the Guthrie Community. Up until last year the park know by residents as "Hastings Parkn had been well maintained including keeping the grass cut for both the use of children playing in the park and for aesthetic reasons. Last year, without consultations or notification, the grass was left to grow long and only after a great deal of efforts from members of the community the grass was finally cut. The new area added to the Park relating to the subdivision at Melville Court has never been maintained by the Township. Children use the sloped areas for winter activities and if not maintained conditions will occur that will prevent this use. The Parkland Study needs to directly deal with the standards for maintaining parks and to clearly guarantee that process will be established to guarantee direct consultations with residents who live in the areas of the Parks. The Parkland Study does not appear to take into account the significant increase in the numbers of children in the Township and the resulting demands for ice time for minor sports programs. In this regard it seems that the Township needs to take measures beyond those recommended in the report of simply monitoring ice time usage. Recommendations are needed for how the monitoring should take place, how the results should be used and how user groups are to be included into the decision making process, I trust that these recommendations will be included wtlen the final Parkland Study Report, ~O-.J? ltfl.u~ Doug Wilson '.... r- ::Jq MINUTES FOR BARRIE PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD MEETING # 02-02 DATE: Thursday, February 28, 2002 TIME: 7:30 p.m. LOCATION: Consumer's Gas Board Room Present: 1. Platt, T. Blain, y. DeCecco, A. Eadie, W. Fraser, N. Irwin, L. McClean. W. Porter, M. Sherman, A. Davis, J. Ross (recorder) 1. Call to Order The meeting was called to order at 7:32pm. 2. Confirmation of Agenda The agenda was confim1ed. 3. Conflict ofInterest None declared. 4. Minutes of Meetim~s 4.1 Minutes of Board Meeting January 24, 2002 #02-01 #02-05 PORTER-BLAIN THAT the Minutes of Board Meeting #02-01 dated Thursday, Ja-Qual)' 24, 2002 be adopted. CARRIED. 5. Business Arising, An amount payable to SOLS for $1465.83 was questioned at the last meeting. It was reimbursement of transportation and accommodation expenses on behalf of candidates applying for director's position. 6. Report of the Chair The Chair reported that staff member Fran Cooke passed away February 19. A flower arrangement was sent on behalf of the Board. J 9 ) A..., 2 t . 7. Committee Reports 7.1 #02-06 IRWIN - PORTER THAT the Financial Statements for January 2002 and the bills amounting to $140,336.15 be approved for payment. CARRIED. 8. Director of Library Services Report for January In January, the Director met with the City Manager, Treasurer, Mayor of Barrie and Chief Librarian of the County of Simcoe. The Director also met with SOLS and discussed their possible role in facilitating a strategic plan. The Chair asked for clarification of the Development Charges. M Sherman commented on increased revenues for Cafe and Boutique as detailed in the Director's report. There was a discussion about another library branch. A preliminary decision by the Planning Committee to participate in the planning process and explore a partnership with the City is needed. W Porter commented on the enjoyable aspect of the live music that was featured during the February Blues/Winterfest weekend in the library. V DeCecco asked about the progress of contract negotiations with the Union. A meeting will take place March 5 between Management and Union representatives. 9. New Business None. 10. Other Business 10.1 Report on Ontario Library Trustees' Association W Porter made a recommendation that BPL join the OL T A for a period of one year, then review. There will be an online interactive video conference for trustees on Saturday, April 20, 2002. $<1)3' " ., "'I .) 10.2 Report on OLA Super Conference 2002 W Porter commented on some of the sessions - 1. One Place to Look 2. The Benefits of John Carver's Policy Governance 3. Strategic Planning is Important to your Library 4. What's Your Agenda 11. Committee Meeting Dates Personnel Committee - Wednesday, March 20 at 7:00pm in the Consumer Gas Board Room Planning Committee - Wednesday, March 20 at 7:30pm in the Consumers Gas Board Room 12. Date of Next Board Meeting Thursday, March 28, 2002 at 7:30 p.m. in the Consumers Gas Board Room 13. Adjournment ./~e me~'Y?s adjourned at 8:55pm. \,.., \, /1 /,,)' '/7 -, ! 1/ ,. . . " . : " ," ...:/ C' ,i .', /.J" /' ~/'\J ',a-'/ CHAIR - :.1"', '1 j I / , I ~ I' 1--+1 ~f /yi ~TE I,' '.., IN I '../1 \/"'/ S \. ,) D I I , ' April 3, 2002 To Clerk Marilyn, for the attention of Council From Tim Crawford, Chairperson, Oro-Medonte History Committee Re: Acquiring a Local Artifact A few years ago, at our request, Council discussed how we should handle the offer of artifacts or antiques which are made available to us from time to time. The results of the discussion, as we understand them, were that we could take possession of small articles, but, mainly due to the storage problem, we were to get permission of Council before assuming possession of any large item. We have had offered to us a very interesting set of barn door hinges made by a Shanty Bay blacksmith -- a Mr. Day. They are relatively large and heavy, measuring about 3 x 2 ft. each. In that we are still "learning" as to what qualifies as a large item, we felt it reasonable to check first with Council before we accepted the hinges. The hinges are a type of "master piece" that used to be made by apprentices before they could become masters. The apprentice would spend many hours making his "master piece" as near perfect as possible, and beautifully ornamented, so as to impress the masters who would authorize the apprentice's entry into their association. Mr. Day spent extra care on these hinges, carefully puncturing holes in them to form the pattern of his initials - a beautiful piece of blacksmithing. Weare not sure if these hinges were for something very special, but we are sure that Mr. Day spent extra care making them. It would be our intent to mount the hinges on barn board, and mount the whole unit on the wall of the Oro Fairgrounds Hall, above the murals, or perhaps near the W. W. 1. guns. Should council agree that we should accept this item, 1 would ask that the donors, Annie and GarfBurton, formerly ofOro Station, now retired to Barrie, be invited to come to present the hinges to the Acting Mayor. (Mr. Day was an uncle of Annie Burton.) RECOMMENDATION that Council authorizes the History Committee to accept the donation of the barn door hinges made by Mr. Day, and that the History Committee chairperson arrange to have the Burtons make the presentation to Council, and that the History Committee mounts the hinges in some suitable way in a building located on the Oro Fair Grounds, in consultation with those responsible for the care and maintenance of those buildings. . , Respectfully requested, , ~~ ,L--/~ ~.-A';7?' ~..4-1rr""-~ . ~uun..y UJ Simcoe ";~,..~/~ /,J/ /.// ,. / . i --~''''''i-'';''~ ~ '-<, 5 c.) I , 1 Beeton Area: (905) 729-2294 CLERK'S OFFICE Telephone Extension 246 II $ ;;; ~ ~ .... pj ~ ~ "l I:!j ~~@ Administration Centre 1110 Highway 26 Midburst, Ontario LOL lXO April 12, 2002 TO: Participating 911 Municipalities and Agencies Subiect: City of Barrie's Decision to Proceed Unilaterally with 911 CERB At its meeting of March 26, 2002, Simcoe County Council received County Officers Item No, CO 02-007, being an information item regarding the City of Barrie's decision to proceed unilaterally with a separate Ontario Provincial Police contract for 911 Central Emergency Reporting Bureau services. A copy of County Officers Item No, CO 02-007 is enclosed which provides in detail the City of Barrie's actions, On March 26, 2002 the City of Barrie executed an individual contract with the OPP under the same terms and conditions as the original County 911 CERB contract, and on April 12, 2002 Bell Canada successfully transferred the Simcoe County and City of Barrie 911 databases to the new OPP CERB service located in Orillia. Due to the unfortunate timing of the City's announcement, it was not feasible to make the required contract amendments recognizing the City's withdrawal prior to the cut-over deadline of April 12, 2002. On April 23, 2002, by way of Item No. PMSP 02-005, Simcoe County Council will consider an addendum agreement which will effectively remove all references to the City of Barrie from the Simcoe County 911 CERB Agreement. A copy of that Item is enclosed for your reference, The annual Simcoe County payment made to the OPP under the 911 CERB contract will be reduced from $181,119,83 to $128,782.18. This reduction is calculated by multiplying the 2001 City of Barrie Municipal Directory population value of 91,022 with the contracted annual per capita rate of $0.575. This change is also reflected in the addendum agreement. The Simcoe County 911 participating municipalities and agencies will be required to sign an addendum to the original contract. A copy of the Addendum Agreement is enclosed so that you can ensure the necessary authority is in place for your Signing Officer( s) to execute the original copies of the agreement when they are circulated. Please notify the County of Simcoe Clerk's Office when your authority is in place to sign the Addendum Agreement. ""-if......, Participating 911 MUniCipalities and AgenCies II ~ \ I page L ' Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Desmond Lorente, GIS Manager, County of Simcoe, (705-726-9300 Ext. 231) Yours truly, /YJAdu I!IOJL Brenda Clark, Assistant Clerk, Encl. Item No. CO 02-007 Item No. PMSP 02-025 Addendum to the Agreement for the Provision of 911 CERB Services c. Desmond Lorente, GIS Manager j ,---- v...:..t..- I I I . ~~ R.R.#1 OriIlia April 15-0V Ellwood McLaughlin Line 14 North #1190 Oro-Medonte Council AEcEIVeJ APR 1 7 2002 ~ \ Regarding the maintenence or lack of on our road. " Speaking to Mr. Ball does not seem to work. We have endured washboard type road for quite some time and with the spring we have mud and more mud.Surely with a dusty gravel pit on our concession we could get some gravel on our road.The township seems to have lots of equipment to do this. I have a new car (2002 Toyota) and before I could drive at highway speeds I was forced to have all wheels balanced and was informed that this was very unusual for this car. Some of our friends had to have help over the mudhole. Also while we are on the subject,WHAT ARE YOU PUTTING on the road for dust,Is it MAPLE SYRUP.????? It is almost impossible to get off the cars, I am enclosing a copy of my garage bill in the hope that you will conside reimbursing me. /- i f E II woo d M c L a ugh 1 i n 7 0 5 - 3 2 6 - ~/?3 6/ie,/~." .' fJ}lit;t~// ,/, ,t.frc", '...-,/ . ,/ i'l r. /"~" /.... (:::/ ..[/ <::--/ 501) I ~ ORILLIA PUBLIC LIBRARY w 36 Mississaga Street West, Orillia, Ontario L3V 3A6 . Telephone (705) 325-2338 . Fax (705) 327-1744 Message from the Board The year 2001 has been a challenging and rewarding one for the library, A recent survey showed that more than 75% of you ranked the library as the community service that benefited you the most. Weare honoured that you feel that way and are committed to providing you with collections, services and facilities to foster enjoyment, learning and culture. The library is fully embracing and promoting new technologies, You may now access thousands of magazine and journal articles and the library's catalogue from our website at orilliapubliclibrary.ca. You have told us that you need a larger library. In 2001, the Board submitted the findings of a building needs study to City Council confinning the need for significantly more space. City Council has authorized the Board to continue to explore options for finding adequate library space, The Board would like to express its thanks to library staff and volunteers for their continued excellence in providing library services to the citizens of Orillia and our surrounding contracting municipalities. We would also like to thank you for your continued support ofthe library. You are using the library more than ever. Library service costs less than $26 per citizen, so for the price of just one new book, you get membership in and full use of all the library's books, magazines, audiovisual materials, computer databases and the internet, plus all services and programs. We look forward to serving you in 2002. As always, we welcome your ideas on how your library can continue to improve, On behalf of the Board, Catherine Dowd Chair HEAD OFFICE 525 Hwy #6 North Flamborough, ON L9H 7K 1 SERVICING LOCATION BEVERLY TIRE (ORILLA) INC R.R.#2, Lot #4, Concession 2 Orillia, Ontario L3V 6H2 (705 )326-6552 ......JJI6., -...; ........ I .' "- GOOD1'iEAII . \"'>""',"\ ",' ~i ~lt>/ "d ~o.~ .....~m/ INVOICE SOLD TO. MCLAUGHLIN, ELWOOD 30-011002759 SHIP TO: R.R.# 1 ORILLIA 30-01/00041865 GST Reg. # 898867650 RT CL:BRX: LUCAS KITCHEN .. COMMERICAL VEHICLES MUST HAVE WHEELS RETIGHTENED after 50 miles travelling or one hour service or end of days use. which ever comes first. HSI;;MU 01 ...... ...... ...... ........ ......... ........ ........ 40,00 i Method of payment: CASH $ 46,00 ~tlOkANORELEASf:i&m!t1"0W!1<<<<$tholii.alJ(lltdd~_r"ritn.ItIMt~4~Wldt ~'r.peII'_.f*ihciIboVt. ~.ah~_-O~.I,...ywIreJIIIOllllllbibiVfcr _or",dh'llflNQt _~WtIlIf.~"oIM,M"f\d""ClMfNyor.idyWfClll'\*.ll.WICi"''''~'lUUIrwflOl!'l~oI~IJf''''''''.'''flfCll!l'llJ, I~\I'IW,,)IQW~ aM~rcdriwhvel1Olloo~f!)f\i;te.~~torir1spe:tiOOwltld~po..."PCIIM \JrIti!~rt"'luIIc1fhe_~~~twWllrId~~dwpwtW:ti!_~..,Wttintor~. ywn~e4k1."" cr~thI:tIIIC'~nhd4...,.adyj;(s.thp1MM1"4 .I!Ieverly Ti.re ha. achie_d ISO 9002 regi..tratioJ: to serve you better Our Mission Cammitted to beingyour mmai and iMl1!lative supplier comistentD' pr~'idi1li the best wvice and pal/il. CUSTOMER SIGNATURE Quality,..1"our N.ed...OUr Responsibility UBLDI:r'l'll'D KtL'AQ, - 3D DAI" QUA.1UJI'1'" ON JtB,6L bLANClIl 40,00 40.00 3.20 2.80 46.00 CLAIMS AND RETURNED GOODS MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY THIS INVOICE NOTRESPONSl8LE FOR ARTICLES LEFT AFTER 3Q DAYS ~ THANK YOU! 00. : . , , .. TOWNSHIP OF ORQ-MEDONTE REPORT DEPARTMENT REPORT TO: PREPARED BY: Fire Report # 2002-06 Members of Council Paul Eenhoorn, Fire Chief SUBJECT: DEPARTMENT: Council Monthly Fire Report Fire and Emergency Services C.ofW. For March, 2002 DATE: Motion # April 12,2002 Date DATE ST A TION TIME TYPE LOCATION DAMAGE Station #1 Motor Vehicle Highway 11 NIB, March 3, 2002 Shanty Bay 21:44: 13 Accident Bet. Line 7 & 8 Station #1 Motor Vehicle Highway 11 SIB, March 3, 2002 Shanty Bay 21: 10:28 Accident @'Line 7 Station #2 Tires on Fire Line 7 and Highway March 8, 2002 Hawkestone 15: 17: 04 on Truck 11 Station #5 Ambulance 4295 Line 9 North March 9, 2002 Wanninster 21:24:20 Assist Station #5 Furnace Fan 1066 Wanninster S.R. March 9, 2002 Wanninster 20:33:53 Overheat Station #2 Trees Down, Line 9 South and March 9,2002 Hawkestone 23:48:25 Across Road Hiahway 11 Station #2 Trees & Wires Line 14 and March 9, 2002 Hawkestone 20:04:01 Down Lakeshore Station #2 Basement 4 Qrillia Road March 10, 2002 Hawkestone 09:23:08 Flood Station #1 Tree and Wires Line 4 South and March 10, 2002 Shanty Bay 20:44:05 Down Highway 11 . Station #2 Multi Vehicle Highway 11 NIB, March 10, 2002 Hawkestone 16: 17:28 Accident Bet. Line 10 & 11 Station #1 Smoke From Highway 11 SIB, ~ March 10, 2002 Shanty Bay 15:49:44 Maple Shed near Line 4 Station #1 Ambulance 31 Barrie Terrace, March 10, 2002 Shanty Bav 15: 00:31 Assist Unit 2 Station #5 Unauthorized 3879 Line 10 North March 10,2002 Wanninster 11: 53:47 Burn Station #5 Hydro Lines 3879 Line 10 North March 10,2002 Wanninster 01: 50:06 Down / \ ~ ., {clef! . . Fire Report 2002-06 Con't ,..2 DATE STATION TIME TYPE LOCATION DAMAGE Station #2 Motor Vehicle Highway 11 NIB, March 11, 2002 Hawkestone 01:57:33 Accident @"Line 9 Station #3 Multi Vehicle Horseshoe Valley Rd" March 11, 2002 Horseshoe 08:41: 17 Accident bet. Line 5 & 6 Station #5 Motor Vehicle Highway 12 and March 11, 2002 Warminster 05: 56:00 Roll Over Warminster S.R. Station #2 Water Rescue - 95 Lakeshore Road March 12, 2002 Hawkestone 12:47:29 Not ReQuired East Station #1 Vehicle Fire, Highway 11 SIB, UNKNOWN March 14, 2002 Shanty Bav 18:02:32 Fullv Involved @-Line 2 Station #2 Rubbish Fire, Line 14 and Highway March 14,2002 Hawkestone 19: 12: 12 Unattended 11 North Station #3 Ambulance 1106 H.V.R. West, March 16, 2002 Horseshoe 23: 14: 07 Assist Go West Grill Station #2 Burning Line 14 S., near the March 17, 2002 Hawkestone 06:34:25 Complaint overpass Station #5 Motor Vehicle Moonstone Road, March 18, 2002 Warminster 04:42: 17 Roll Over West of Hwv. 12 Station #1 Motor Vehicle Line 2 S. and Highway March 18, 2002 Shanty Bav 08:06:05 Accident 11 Station #1 Newspaper Box 2621 Gore Road March 19,2002 Shanty Bav 23: 04:40 On Fire Station #3 Carbon 64 Procee Circle March 19,2002 Horseshoe 10:21:00 Monoxide Call Station #3 Vehicle Near 2562 Bidwell March 19, 2002 Horseshoe 16: 13:21 Overheat Road Station #2 Rubbish Fire, Line 14 and Highway March 19, 2002 Hawkestone 18:06:40 Unattended 11 North Station #1 Alarm - No Highway 11 Nand March 20,2002 Shanty Bav 16:27: 10 Fire I saw smoke line 7 Station #5 Ambulance 1023 Line 15 North March 22, 2002 Warminster 10:06: 12 Assist Station #2 Alarm - No Fire 1001 Line 8 South March 23, 2002 Hawkestone 10:07:33 Station #1 Motor Vehicle Highway 11 SIB, March 24, 2002 Shanty Bav 10:05:04 Roll Over Bet. Line 2 & 3 Station #2 Alarm - No Fire, 325 Tudhope Blvd. March 24, 2002 Hawkestone 18:47:03 CookinQ I Smoke Station #6 Ambulance 69 Mt. S1. Louis Rd. March 25, 2002 Moonstone 17:00:45 Assist West Station #6 Garage Fire 4829 Vasey Road $ 1,500.00 L March 25, 2002 Moonstone 12:42:08 $ 9,000.00 S Station #4 Motor Vehicle Old Barrie Road, March 25,2002 RUQbv 23:32:28 Extrication Bet. Line 9 & 10 Station #1 Vehicle Fire, 5 Melville Court $ 8,000.00 L March 27, 2002 Shanty Bav 01:08:27 2 Cars $ .OOS Station #4 Ambulance 8 Claremont Cr., March 27, 2002 Ruabv 19:49: 13 Assist FerQus Hill Estates Station #2 Ambulance 667 Line 10 South March 28, 2002 Hawkestone 11: 13:48 Assist oq J -5 . , , Fire Report 2002-06 Con't .,.3 DATE STATION TIME TYPE LOCATION DAMAGE Station #4 Burning 5 Houses East of March 29,2002 Ruabv 08:24:01 ComDlaint Line 12 Station #2. Motor Vehicle Highway 11 SIB, March 29, 2002 Hawkestone 05:46:50 Accident Bet. Line 9 & 10 - Station #fj Brush Fire 5723 Vasey Road March 30, 2002 Moonstone 06:56:30 Station #2. Vehicle 352 Line 11 South March 30, 2002 Hawkestone 23:20:222 Overheat Station #4 Chimney Fire 3829 Line 13 North $ 10,000.00 L March 30,2002 Ruabv 08:46:50 $120,000.00 S Station #3 Vehicle In The Horseshoe Valley Rd., March 30, 2002 Horseshoe 10:03:48 Bush and Bass lake S.R. Station #2. Carbon 31 Matilda Street March 31, 2002 Hawkestone 03:28:28 Monoxide Call Structure and Vehicle Fire Dollar Value Lost Dollar Value Saved $ 19,500.00 $ 129,000.00 Ambulance Assist Calls comparison: March calls 2001 - 1, 2002 - 7 f , . I b q) 1 I . Monthly Fire Report for March. 2002 Training Sessions Station #1 Station #2 Station #5 Shanty Bay Hawkestone Warminster 2 2 2 Station #3 Station #4 Station #6 Horseshoe Rugby Moonstone 2 2 2 Inspection Record for the Month (including Fire Prevention / Public Education) Commercial Residential I Bed & Breakfast 3 Industrial Schools I Assembly I Church 2 Wood stove 1 Daycare I Camps I Hall Tours Comments or Recommendations by Fire Chief and/or Deputy Fire Chief Extra training J Seminars and Events Attended Chiefs Meeting Trainer Facilitators Meeting Hosted Mutual Aid Oxygen I Defib Training Respectfully submitted, 4b~ Paul Eenhoorn, Fire Chief C.A.O. COMMENTS: C~b DATE: C.A.O. DEPT. HEAD \, . . ORO-MEDONTE RECREATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE MINUTES Wednesday, April 18, 2002 Oro-Medonte Administration Centre .. Chair Ruth Fountain called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m, Present: Ian Hunter, Catherine Riffer-Wessel, Dave Knox, Nadeen Morano, Mayor Neil Craig, Councillor Ruth Fountain and Councillor Harry Hughes Staff Present: Jennifer Zieleniewski (C.A.O.), Marilyn Pennycook (Clerk) Others Present: Julie Scott, Innovative Perspectives Regrets: Chris Carter (Recreation Co-ordinator) 1. Adoption of April 18, 2002 Agenda: Moved by D. Knox; seconded by N. Morano That the Agenda for the April 18, 2002 Advisory Committee be received and adopted as printed and circulated, Carried. 2. Adoption of March 13, 2002 Minutes: Moved by D. Knox; seconded by C. Riffer-Wessel That the Minutes of the March 13, 2002 Recreation Advisory Committee Meeting be received and adopted as printed and circulated. Carried. 3. Disclosure of Pecuniary Interest: None 1 'I t 4. Deputations: None, 5. Special Business: a) Trail Advisory Minutes Moved by N. Craig; seconded by D. Knox That the recommendation of the Oro-Medonte Trail Committee to adopt the Canadian Tiger Swallowtail as the official Railtrail mascot, to be installed on the kilometre marker posts, be deferred pending a presentation to the Recreation Advisory Committee by the proponents. Carried, Moved by D. Knox; seconded by 1. Hunter That the Oro-Medonte Trail Committee minutes of March 27, 2002 be received and adopted as printed and circulated. Carried, b) Parkland Secondary Study- Update: Innovative Perspectives - Julie Scott. Julie Scott, Innovative Perspectives, presented a written submission in reply to concerns presented at the Public Meeting regarding the Parkland Secondary Study on February 21, 2002, Moved by D. Knox; seconded by N. Morano That the written submission by Julie Scott, Innovative Perspectives, in response to the concerns brought forward from the Public Meeting regarding the Parkland Secondary Study held on February 21, 2002, be received, as amended. Carried. 2 Moved by N. Morano; seconded by D. Knox That it be recommended to Council that the Parkland Secondary Study of April, 2002, be approved. Carried. c) Minutes From Public Meeting. Received. d) Correspondence. None. 7. Co-ordinator's Monthly Report: In the absence of the Recreation Co-ordinator, the report was deferred, The Committee requested that the draft pamphlet of Summer Programs be forwarded to them for information, 8. Committee Chairperson's Report: None. 9. Other Business (Information or Request for future information): a) Goals and Objectives. To be brought forward. 10. Adjournment: Moved by Dave Knox That the April 18, 2002 meeting of the Oro-Medonte Recreation Advisory Committee does now adjourn at 8:10pm Next Meeting: May 2, 2002 @ 7pm 3 , . . I CI i REPORT DEPT. REPORT TO: Council PREPARED BY: #ES2002-29 Keith Mathieson SUBJECT & FILE #: DEPARTMENT: COUNCIL: Heidi's RV, Sales - Site Plan Public Works Agreement - Pt. W % Lot 20, C.OFW. Conc, 11 (Formerly Township of Oro), being Part 1, MOTION #: 51 R-30235, being all of PIN DATE: #58547-0129 (Lt) DATE: April 15, 2002 Mr. Buechin, owner of Heidi's R. V. Sales, is proposing to construct an irregular shaped gravel parking lot approximately 200 m x 245 m x 100 m x 215 m for the purpose of the storage of trailers. The Site Plan Committee reviewed Mr. Buechin's Site Plan on March 7, 2002, at which time several revisions were required to the Site Plan and comments from the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority were requested. The comments from the Site Plan Committee and the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority have been added as revisions to the original Site Plan, The securities, as recommended by the Site Plan Committee, have been posted with the Township. Township staff have no concerns with this development. . RECOMMENDA . 1. THAT Council receives and adopts this report. 2. THAT the Township of Oro-Medonte enters into a Site Plan Agreement with Heidi's R. V. Sales, Pt. W Y:z Lot 20, Conc. 11 (formerly Township of Oro), being Part 1, 51 R-30235, being all of PIN #58547-0129 (Lt). 3. THAT the Clerk prepares a By-law to enter into a Site Plan Agreement for Council's consideration. ResQIY submitted, c~ Keith Mathieson cr~ l , ............. \. '') ,; APPENDIX "B" SITE PLAN AGREEMENT - between - HEIDI'S R.V. SALES - and - THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE DESCRIPTION OF LANDS pt. W Y:z Lot 20, Concession 11 (Formerly Township of Orc) Being Part 1 . 51 R-30235 Being all of PIN #58547-0129 (Lt) March, 2002 By-Law No. 2002- TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE COUNTY OF SIMCOE 'I ., . . Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 Section 5 Section 6 Section 7 Section 8 Section 9 Section 10 Schedule "A" Schedule "B" Schedule "C" Schedule "0" Schedule "E" THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE SITE PLAN AGREEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS Covenants by the Owner Covenants by the Township Development Restrictions Development Changes Security Compliance Co-operation Binding Effect Severability of Clauses Save Harmless SCHEDULES Legal Description of Lands Site Plan Deeds and Easements to be Conveyed Itemized Estimate of Cost of Construction Standard Township Letter of Credit 2 1<1)3 1'1/'1 . . SITE PLAN CONTROL AGREEMENT \, This Agreement made in quadruplicate this day of accordance with Section 41 of the Planning Act. 2002, in BETWEEN: HEIDI'S R.V. SALES Hereinafter called the "Owner" PARTY OF THE FIRST PART -and- THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE Hereinafter called the,"Township" PARTY OF THE SECOND PART WHEREAS the Owner has applied to the Township of Oro-Medonte to permit a commercial parking lot on lands described in Schedule "A", attached hereto; AND WHEREAS the Township has enacted a Sy-Iaw to provide for the designation of the lands as a "Site Plan Control Area"; AND WHEREAS the Owner intends to develop the lands in accordance with the Site Plan attached hereto as Schedule "S"; NOW THEREFORE This Agreement Witnesseth THAT in consideration of the mutual covenants hereinafter contained, the parties hereto hereby covenant and agree as follows: lq) 5 \ , 1, COVENANTS BY THE OWNER The Owner covenants and agrees as follows: a) The Owner owns the subject lands described in Schedule "A", attached hereto, and has provided the Township with a Registered Deed containing the legal description of the subject lands. b) This Agreement may be registered against title to these subject lands and shall take priority over any subsequent registrations against the title to the subject lands. c) No work shall be performed on the lands nor any use made of the subject lands with respect to the proposed development except in conformity with all the provisions of this Agreement. d) The Owner shall, prior to the execution of this Agreement. obtain all necessary permits and approvals from the Township and from all Ministries and Agencies, including, but not limited to, the County of Simcoe District Health Unit. e) The Owner shall. prior to the execution of this Agreement, pay all Municipal taxes and charges related to obtaining the approval of these lands for the intended use. f) The Owner shall pay a refundable deposit for such reasonable costs as may be involved to the Township in having its Solicitor, Engineer, Planner and staff, perform any work in connection with this Agreement, including the preparation, drafting, execution, and registration of this Agreement. The Owner acknowledges and agrees that the Owner shall be responsible for the cost of performance of all the Owner's obligations hereunder unless the context otherwise requires. Every provision of this Agreement by which the Owner is obligated in any way shall be deemed to include the works "at the expense of the Owner" unless specifically stated otherwise. The refundable deposit for expenses and actual cost shall be $1,000.00. The owner shall replenish the refundable deposit, to its full amount, when the expenses and actual costs are submitted by the Township. g) The Owner shall have delivered to the Township, all Transfers/Deeds. Discharges and Easements or other documents required by Schedule "C", as well as certification from the Owner's Solicitor that the TransferlDeeds and Easements shall provide the Township with good title, free and clear from all encumbrances. 2. COVENANTS BY THE TOWNSHIP The Township covenants and agrees as follows: a) That the Township has enacted a By-law to permit a commercial parking lot on the Site Plan. b) That the Township agrees that subject to compliance by the Owner with all relevant Municipal By-laws and Provincial Statutes and Regulations, the Owner may proceed to develop the subject lands as indicated on the Site Plan attached hereto as Schedule "B", subject to the development restrictions contained herein. 4 I q) t:) . I 3, DEVELOPMENT RESTRICTIONS \') The Parties hereto acknowledge and agree that any use of the subject lands by the Owner shall be on and subject to the following terms and conditions: a) Site Plan The use and development of the subject lands shall be in accordance with and as set out on the Site Plan attached hereto as Schedule "B". b) Lighting All lighting systems installed outside, such as floodlights, shall be directed away from any adjacent residential use and/or roadway, not to cause interference in any way. c) Parking Areas and Driveways All parking areas and driveways shall be constructed, in conformity with Sections 5.19 and 5.20 of By-law No. 97-95, as amended, and the Ontario Building Code Regulation 419/86, all applicable Provincial and Federal legislation, and also including the Federal fisheries, and such parking areas, loading and access areas shall be kept free and clear of snow and ice and kept adequately drained. All entrances shall be constructed as in Schedule "B", attached. The Owner agrees to obtain all necessary approvals from the Ministry of Transportation, County of Simcoe and Township of Oro-Medonte. d) Outside Storage No outside storage shall be permitted between any buildings on the premises and any street. Any other outside storage shall be contained in the fenced compound, as identified on Schedule "B". e) Garbage Storage The Owner agrees to provide suitable storage areas for garbage and waste as shown on the Site Plan and to install and maintain litter containers in and around development on the lands. All metal scrap and associated refuse contained in the fenced compound shall be removed on a weekly basis. f) Landscaping The Owner shall complete all landscaping and landscaped areas shown on the Site Plan, attached as Schedule "B", as soon as weather permits and all grading and sodding required, according to any Engineering drawings submitted. shall be done on all lawn areas. g) Erosion and Siltation Control The owner must take all necessary precautions to prevent erosion and sedimentation of ditches and culverts, slopes, etc., within the Site Plan, and downstream prior to and during construction. The owner agrees to maintain all erosion and siltation control devices in good repair until vegetative cover has been successfully established. 4. DEVELOPMENT CHANGES The parties acknowledge and agree that there shall be no changes to this Agreement or the Schedules attached hereto unless and until such changes have been approved, in writing, by all Parties. 5 lq)7 , . 5. SECURITY Prior to signing the Agreement. the Owner will deposit with the Treasurer of the Township. to cover the faithful performance of the obligations of the Owner arising under this Agreement. including but not limited to the construction of the works and services identified in Schedule "0" to this Agreement (the "said Work"). the following securities: a) Cash in the amount of Four Thousand Dollars ($4,000.00), as approved by the Site Plan Committee and Township Council, or: b) An irrevocable Letter of Credit from a Chartered Bank. issued in accordance with the requirements of Schedule "E". with an automatic renewal clause in the amount of one hundred percent (100%) of the estimated costs of the said works. and as approved by the Township Engineer. The Letter of Credit shall be for a minimum guaranteed period of one (1) year or such time as the Township decides and shall be renewed automatically. as necessary. thirty (30) days prior to expiration. c) The Township reserves the right to accept or reject any of these altemative methods of providing securities. Prior to depositing the securities. the Owner's Engineer shall submit an estimate of the cost of the works to the Township Engineer for approval. When the cost estimate has been approved. it will be set out in Schedule "0" of this Agreement and will become the basis for the limits of the securities. d) Any Letter of Credit or security filed with the Township is based upon the estimated cost of completing the various matters prescribed by this Agreement. However, all Letters of Credit and Security received by the Township may be used as security for any item or any other matter which, under the terms of this Agreement. is the responsibility of the Owner. including without limiting the generality of the foregoing, payment of engineering. legal. planning or other costs incurred by the Township. which are the responsibility of the Owner. under the terms of this Agreement. e) Upon written notification by the Owners' agent. certifying that all required works for which the Letter of Credit was submitted, have been completed in accordance with the plans submitted and upon confirmation by the Township or its agent that the Owner's obligations under this Agreement have been completed. the Township will return said Letter of Credit. f) If in the event of default of the Owner under any of the provisions of this Agreement. it becomes necessary for the Township to realize on its security or deposits. then the Township shall give. by registered mail. twenty-one (21) days notice. its intent to draw down on the security or deposit. 6. COMPLIANCE Any action taken by the Township or on its behalf. pursuant to this Agreement, shall be in addition to and without prejudice to any security or other guarantee given on behalf of the Owner for the performance of its covenants and agreements herein and upon default on the part of the Owner hereunder. the Township shall, in addition to any other remedy available to it. be at liberty to utilize the provisions of Section 325 of the Municipal Act. R.S.O. 1980. Chapter 302. as amended. 7, CO-OPERATION The Owner consents to the registration of this Agreement by the Township. upon the title of the subject lands, at the expense of the Owner and agrees to execute such further and other documents, consents or applications as required for the purpose of securing registration and giving effect to the provisions of this Agreement. 6 8, BINDING EFFECT 1'1) 0 ~ l This Agreement, and everything contained herein, shall be binding upon the successors and assigns of the Parties hereto and upon the lands described in Schedule "A", attached hereto, such Schedule being a legal description of the lands, and it is further agreed that this Agreement shall be prepared, approved and registered on title. 9, SEVERABILITY OF CLAUSES Should any Section, Subsection, Clause, Paragraph or Provision of this Agreement be declared by a Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the Agreement as a whole or any part thereof, other than the provision so declared to be invalid. 1 O. SAVE HARMLESS The Owner, on behalf of itself, its successors and assigns, agrees to indemnify and save hannless the Township from and against any and all claims, suits, actions and demands whatsoever which may arise either directly or indirectly by reason of any work or service perfonned by the Township, its servants or sub-contractors in order to complete the work or services required to be completed under this Agreement, provided the subject matter of such action. suits. claims or demands was not caused intentionally or through gross negligence on the part of the Township. its servants or agents or sub-contractors. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereunto have affixed their respective seals under the hands of their proper officers duly authorized in that behalf. SIGNED, SEALED AND DELIVERED 7 ) ~ G--- ) Owner: HEIDI'S R,V, SALES ) ) Urs Buechin !~ ) O...mer: ) ) Liliane Buechin ) ) ) The Corporation of the ) Township of Oro-Medonte ) per: ) ) ) ) Acting Mayor, J. Neil Craig 1'1 )9 SCHEDULE "A" NOTE: It is understood and agreed that this Schedule forms part of the Site Plan Agreement between the Township of Oro-Medonte and Heidi's R.V. Sales. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF LANDS Pt. W % Lot 20, Concession 11 (Formerly Township of Oro), being Part 1. 51 R-30235. Township of Oro-Medonte, County of Simcoe, being all of PIN #58547-0129 (Lt). NOTE: SITE PLAN I q ) IV SCHEDULE "B" It is understood and agreed that this Schedule forms part of the Site Plan Agreement between the Township of Oro-Medonte and Heidi's R.V. Sales. Site Plan is not in a registerable form and is available from the Township of Oro-Medonte. 9 1 Cj ) II " ..' SCHEDULE"C" NOTE: It is understood and agreed that this Schedule forms part of the Site Plan Agreement between the Township of Oro-Medonte and Heidi's R.V. Sales. DEEDS AND EASEMENTS TO BE CONVEYED All title documents shall be properly drawn and executed by the parties, with the appropriate Lot or Block Number inserted in the description of the document, and the registered Plan Number shall be left blank. to be inserted by the solicitors for the parties after the Plan is registered and a Plan Number assigned. The consideration for all conveyances shall be the sum of Two dollars ($2.00) and the cost of preparation, execution and registration thereof, shall be borne by the Owner. All documents to be registered. shall be prior approved by the Solicitor for the Township. The following land and easement shall be conveyed: 1.0 LANDS TO BE CONVEYED TO THE TOWNSHIP N/A 2.0 DRAINAGE EASEMENTS TO BE CONVEYED TO THE TOWNSHIP N/A 10 [g)lt- . ~ ~, SCHEDULE "D" NOTE: It is understood and agreed that this Schedule fonns part of the Site Plan Agreement between the Township of Oro-Medonte and Heidi's R.V. Sales. ITEMIZED ESTIMATE OF COST OF CONSTRUCTION 1. ITEMIZE CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE AMOUNT N/A 2. LETTERS OF CREDIT AMOUNT Letter of Credit to be provided by the Owner to ensure completion of all works required under the tenns of this Agreement. as noted in Section 5 herein. $4,000.00 II ~ q ) '. r' TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE FROM THE TOWNSHIP PLANNER IRE PORT TO COUNCIL I REPORT NO.: PD2002-20 COUNCIL PREPARED BY: Andria Leigh C. OF W. DATE: AprH11r 2002 MOTION SUBJECT: Committee of Adjustment DATE Decisions for AprH11r 2002 I SUMMARY I Attached are the Planning Reports and Committee of Adjustment Decisions for the Consent and Minor Variance applications that were heard at the Committee of Adjustment meeting held on April 11, 2002. The last date for receiving an appeal to the above noted decisions is Wednesday May 1, 2002. Consent Applications B-8/02 Donald Bick Con 12, Plan 653, Lot 23 &24 (Ora) 127 Robinson Street Minor Variance Applications A-2/02 Claudio Venditti Plan 626, Lot 10 (Ora) 19 Stanley Ave. B-9/02 Monica Interior Design Ltd. Con 7, Part Lot 1 (Ora) Line 6 North/Ironwood Trail Respectfully submitted, .--/1~ ----(~~ v C.AD, COMMENTS: DATE: Andria Leigh, Hons B,A.,AMCT, MCIP,RPP Township Planner C.AD. c~.., V"\ TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT REPORT NO.: COF A2002-A02 PREPARED BY: Todd Weatherell DATE: Apri13, 2002 APPLICANT: Claudio Venditti APPLICATION NO.: A-2j02 ROLL NUMBER: 4346 010 010 14100 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Plan 626, Lot 10 (former Township ofOro) 19 Stanley Ave. I PROPOSAL The applicant is requesting relief for: a) Interior side yard setback from 3 metres (9.8 feet) to 0.90 metres (2.95 feet) on the west side for a single-family dwelling. b) Interior side yard setback from 3 metres (9.8 feet) to 1.9 metres (6.4 feet) on the east side for a single-family dwelling. c) Relief from the minimum distance from the average high water mark of Lake Simcoe from 20 metres (66 feet) to 10 metres (32.8 feet) for an attached deck. I AGENCY COMMENTS 11 _ Roads Superintendent: No Concerns Building Department: Alteration of dwelling unit with-in limiting distance will require construction to confonn to Section 9.14 of the Ontario Building Code. Maximum area of unprotected openings (windows) will be 0, windows to be removed or protected. . ~ I J x*- \ ~ u q jj '. .. DOES THE VARIANCE CONFORM WITH THE GENERAL INTENT OF THE OFFICIAL PLAN? The subject property is designated Shoreline in the Township's Official Plan. The general intent of the policies is to preserve the character of the shoreline residential area and to protect the natural features of the shoreline, The proposed construction/addition to the house would not appear to impact on the character of the shoreline residential area. On this basis, the application would appear to confonn with the general intent of the policies of the Official Plan, DOES THE VARIANCE CONFORM WITH THE GENERAL INTENT OF THE ZONING BY-LAW PROVISIONS? The subject property is zoned Shoreline Residential (SR) in the Township's Zoning By- law 97-95, as amended, The intent of the By-law is to establish setback requirements, which assist in preserving the natural shoreline and maintaining the residential character. The proposed replacement or addition to the dwelling would create an aesthetically pleasing lot within the shoreline residential area, The proposed variance would appear to maintain the intent ofthe Zoning By-law provisions, IS THE VARIANCE DESIRABLE FOR THE APPROPRIATE DEVELOPMENT OR USE OF THE LAND? Upon site inspection it is evident that the dwelling would not appear to affect any of the surrounding neighbours as an existing dwelling is already present on site. There is currently vegetative buffering along the property lines, and the variance would allow for the dwelling to be straightened out on the lot. Therefore the variance would be desirable on the lot for the house from the shoreline and from the interior side yard setbacks. ? '7 \, .! o '"1, I..f f I lIS THE VARIANCE MINOR IN NATURE? I The proposed variances for the dwelling are considered minor in nature on the basis that the variance would not appear to negatively affect any surrounding neighbours and it will improve the character ofthe lot. I RECOMMENDATION I It is recommended that Minor Variance Application A-2/02 be approved subject to the following conditions: 1. That an Ontario Land Surveyor provide verification to the Township of compliance with the Committee's decision by 1) pinning the footing and 2) verifYing in writing prior to pouring of the foundation by way of survey/real property report prepared by an Ontario Land Surveyor. 2, That the setbacks be in conformity with the dimensions as set out in the application, as submitted; 3. That the Township of Oro-Medonte Building Department approve ofthe application, in writing; 4. That the appropriate building permit be obtained from the Township's Chief Building Official only after the Committee's decision becomes final and binding, as provided for within the Planning Act R.S.O, 1990, c.P, 13; 5. That all municipal taxes be paid to the Township ofOro-Medonte. Decision BE IT RESOLVED that: Moved by, David Edwards seconded by, Albert Pross "That the Committee hereby Grant Minor Variance Application A-2/02 subject to the conditions listed above." ~X/5(I,vi ---- . ~~ ~~r t~i1ol'l~ ^~""- r eG" ~t.t" , III <t: ~c.~ ~ ~ It!! f:ft. ,,'!I' 'I.' \~~ " ,~. ~. \,.(o~ . 1.1. 1 Y. I .':'/ ,!I. I;)V--~ I \~O , I) 1'! j . I : '1 ...: \ 0.3 " I C>foUI.II I Ot",,,' l I ~! :1 I ~ I -.;. ..., f t:. """ fI!' i~ ~ , .. p.$' , tlJO "b 'a.. ~ ,....' '1.1 ' .~,''). II IDa-, O.C:ltf ~f" .0.... ,~...' ~.' ,\' ,"; ~ G' ~~ I.... ~ .... \\J ... .... 0'; 0') ~ \0 01 ~ ~Q ~~V ...~' I, ~ ....J I-... CI') ~ " C) +-1 1'1 110 ." ...... \0 \0 .. t- .. '" , t('V ~~ ." -. " - . ..' :I -. -I g .1/1 III . : ., A. . -! a, ~ . .. '" . :I: ~ ~ ...J ~-/' ,,,."1 Df-ell ) . \ e.58 . :: 0 :1 1,,.0\111" 0 'i \M'fL. tl.. aD ~ In alllf.\.lltlG - . ....~ . .' .. 0"- . 00 o- w . U . N~ 1'1", Za "" ......, o[tl& Qt., I ... .41;' O."'u 10' IIJU J \ ,..: - (f) ;:> ~ " -' ~ t .. b ,I~ 0 ____ ---.:-o~, i\ ..~\' 1.~.'t ,4,0. .... t' . o J +I "'" Ii All.IM IHE IJ ' .\ .. \1'1 ... . .;. ... 11 . q\t::' l~' 0', .. ... .... ... ~ ~ \0 0, ~ I, c:) ....J / I..... V) ~ ~ ~IMCOr: .... . NOTE. THE L'M" HE~EoN . A~~ r v '~N p$ /~ -:~ ~ ' 5:Ej) "v ()~ I ?)'~O,cO _ r It<" J~ \ ..Eo 1;..--- 00 ..' ~O \~. ". .,' .... ~ ,.. ~ .. ,,1 \ \~. ~""~' t'1., " \\J .. ,..- 1 Dill.' .0'1'1' a.C'~ '... ......'. .... Q'j (j) I.... ~ III ..~ ~ (;0 GtV ~' ,5 I..... ~\ ~ ~ ~ ....J I- e') ~ .... .1 ...... ~ ~o \D ~o +, 1'1 ., It) '- t>. '.. - "'- " ~, ! -I ~ ~' , ~v ".0 ~ a ...,J OtlO.S . . t ~ QI ~ . . . . z !I 11 o . . . . .....0 00 . . N... I...: 1'1... Z a v) ':J.,., __ ." ~t--~ +1 ,.. iii ...... f \@' 0', I \ . .'-. . \ I I ....... ~ \\i lO '.. i 14 .\ ~ I..... ~ ...~ I ~ '.. @~. rOE: c:lf'/lv ~ ~C: , A I ...... NOT THE L.I~ HEREOf ~! .!.I:1E_ .. r .' TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT . REPORT NO.: COFA2002 B-09 PREPARED BY: Todd Weatherell DATE: April 3, 2002 APPLICANT: Monica Interior Design Limited APPLICATION NO.: B-9j02 ROLL NUMBER: 4346 010 003 27500 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Concession 7, Lot 1, Plan 51R-17872 (Oro) I PROPOSAL ~J The applicant is proposing a boundary adjustment and an addition to a lot(s). The land to be conveyed would be Parts 2,3,6 and 7 on Plan 51R-17872. Part 2 would be added to Block 79, Part 3 will be added to Block 80, Part 6 will be added to Blocks 82 and 83, and Part 7 will be added to Blocks 84 and 85, I AGENCY COMMENTS Building Department: No Concerns I OFFICIAL PLAN The subject property is designated Residential within the Sugarbush Settlement Node Boundary in the Township's Official Plan. The intent of the residential designation within the Sugarbush node is to pennit development that shall be sited to maximize the preservation ofthe site's topography, wherever possible, The application is deemed to generally confonn with the policies ofthe Official Plan, as it would allow for the ~ 'i ! I , ~q \ v 'I f" .' appropriate development of this Ironwood Trail. This application is not creating any additional residential lots, it is only improving the lot configuration of the existing parcels, IZONING BY-LAW I The subject property currently does not have a zoning as it was initially identified as a road allowance, In 1990 this road allowance was stopped up and closed and not intended to be used for roadway purposes. This was later conveyed to Monica Interior design for development of the adjacent lands. A residential zoning of the property would be appropriate .. . , I RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Consent Application B-9/02 be granted subject to the following conditions: 1. That the Township ofOro-Medonte Building Department approves of the application, in writing, 2. That three copies of a Reference Plan of the subject lands prepared by an Ontario Land Surveyor be submitted to the Committee Secretary or appropriate registerable description, 3. That three copies of deeds be submitted to the Committee Secretary to be stamped using Fonn 2 as prescribed in the Planning Act. 4. That all Municipal taxes be paid to the Municipality, 5. That the conditions of consent imposed by the Committee be fulfilled within one year from the date of giving of this notice. 6. That the applicant apply to the Township to rezone the subject property. Decision BE IT RESOLVED that: Moved by, Ken Robbins seconded by Joe Charles "That the Committee hereby GRANT Application B-9/02 subject to the conditions listed above, " v -; . . .. v '" ~~v. " If) \- .$ Q) ~ 0 0 C'J 0 0 \ "t'"" . .. 0 \ t Q) 0- 0 0 \- 0- 0 t) "t'"" Q) 'is :J (j) \ \ \~ \~ \~ \",'{f.'~ \ ~ ,. '~-l '.s; \. t\ ;1;' ~'f,~ ..~ r? :?- \ '"\ :::; '. ~t 1.\ '" \ ~\ :.r. 1\8 ..-." ...~ ~ ...- <:J!G>",.;t; " 'i ..J ~ '7:!-07 ~ d. G~ a:: %. ~. r- ....~: 'l'\~"'" ;..,;- ,.. ~ Z _J .. - ~. '0. <:(: t ,..~~ : _ ~l i:5 L ':~ ~ 'l.A : \ ----\ \ I---~~ \- ~. ~'~ ...~ " I:"~ ". '1:T > ,~." ~'l.4 g, ~, 60S 1~--"" g .-.-"'" '.-..jj, ;3.J'I ~ 500.,.,..a> \ g ~ ~~'l.'?> ~." 9L7T \ Co 0 . CO 'i, ~ ,.,48 .... Z ~ ~. -~ ;0 jt. \\~ ~ ~zZ. 9Q.2O (CfJ'.,.,fI} 'l.\ (19.68 ~'Z;O '1_8 ?).. (}I.."'i. 56 \,,:\,.. .- "r !t " ~~ \i~ -A~ . "" \" s.~ ~v :/ ~"I-I ' I >2 I $ I '9> \ ~.-l- . ..;..~- ~--\--\--\ 1\ \ ',. \-. \. \ L-.~~Y/ .~ :..t..: ~(j:'i, \01. "'...;..~ '5\-,.1.- !ffi.l;\S"':'c"jts:"j.) I:>><IVE \ '"' ~ ~ ....1: Irj # Q:' is It ti ~ ~ ,.t; -'-i. . ., . . . -11\. e g ~ !f S(a 4f?~4 ~ Or /-/- N rr7'~ o q 11 .~ ~ -.....---.__.--..--.~..~.~ PARi 8 '~"; PLAN 5:R-r1872 os ~ t".j ~ ..., ~ ~ '" ~ ~ < ~ 1 :> c < ,. f AREA - 1687.7 m2 BLOCK 82 ~ ~ ") N 77"50'20. E 57.236 N 82"27'25" E' 27.3f18 ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ < ~ N ~ ~ Irl "'! ~ . BLOCK 81 LOT 34 ~ ~ ") N 77"50'20' E 57.236 AREA" 1983.1 m2 BLOCK 80 LOT 33 ~ ~ 1 )1 49.95 63.262 N 69'40'05" E . ~ ~ ~ 1rl ~ C\j ~ ::t l?f19is/~ed P/UI 1~4.t~S~~O' E 51M"367 N 20,10:8 ~ \ \ ~,198' '. ..... ,13 " 5/M-368 ---, 38.000 AREA " 1680.5 m2 BLOCK 79 __,,;~tlfed p/Of1 ......... t) j \3"""""..., .. .... TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE REPORT TO COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT " REPORT NO.: COF A2002-B08 . - PREPARED BY: Todd Weatherell .. . DATE: Apri14, 2002 APPLICANT: Donald Bick APPLICATION NO.: B-8j02 ROLL NUMBER: 4346 010 011 30000 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Concession 11, Lot 23, West Part Lot 24, Plan 653 (Oro) , 'PROPOSAL The applicant is proposing a boundary adjustment. The land to be conveyed has a lot frontage of 7,62 metres (25 feet), a lot depth of 156,97 metres (515) feet, and lot area of approximately 0,12 hectares (0,3 acres). The land to be retained would have a lot frontage of 15.24 metres (50 feet), a lot depth of 156.97 metres (515 feet) and a lot area of 0.24 hectares (0,59 acres), I 'AGENCY COMMENTS Building Department: . , j,. ~ '1 ) 13 ... ,." I 'OFFICIAL PLAN .' The subject property is designated Shoreline (Section DlO) in the Township's Official Plan. The intent of the Official Plan policies is to protect the natural features of the shoreline area and to maintain the existing character of the residential area, As no new lots will be created this application would be deemed to generally confonn to the policies of the Official Plan. .. I IZONING BY-LAW The subject property is zoned Shoreline Residential (SR) in Zoning By-law 97-95, as amended, The proposed boundary adjustment would separate the existing cottage that is on a 50-foot parcel back to its original parcel size, and the new parcel created would have a lot size of approximately 80 feet. This addition will improve the lot area for the new vacant parcel. On this basis the application would be deemed to comply with the provisions of the Township's Zoning By-law I I RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Consent Application B-8/02 be granted subject to the following conditions: ~ .. 1. That the Township ofOro-Medonte Building Department approves of the application, in writing. 2. That three copies of a Reference Plan of the subject lands prepared by an Ontario Land Surveyor be submitted to the Committee Secretary or appropriate registerable description. 3. That three copies of deeds be submitted to the Committee Secretary to be stamped using Fonn 2 as prescribed in the Planning Act. 4, That all Municipal taxes be paid to the Municipality, 5, That the conditions of consent imposed by the Committee be fulfilled within one year from the date of giving of this notice. f . Decision ~ . BE IT RESOLVED that: Moved by, Albert Pross seconded by David Edwards "That the Committee hereby GRANT Application B-8/02 subject to the conditions above," ~- () ~' CD ~~ " "- - , ',,- - r:-: . __ ." \;' 1_'0.0 ~ 1./ . '~' ~ I 0 · ~~ I N3315'10"W -- 'I , in~J.. , I I '-.... l. . , I \I r'\ I . \.......'. ~..., "'" -... r- ", ,.._ _... I I I I ,,-, \.J -.... ~ ........ " '-.....'-....."......./,.... " - --J, I~-,.. p --I ~~ ~ : ..~ '~'...' JI1 N31'<<'OO.W N33.00'OO"'W "10. 011359.58 CR.P.653) (Meas, ) 470 i11 Q :.(; o t I /''\ -T- - J ~L_\./ I l (" ~~ .-"-""l/i"'HI j !I~t~:I'r.~!~i:'tf,~1!~~~';'~(~")t~\~1r~"E~~'m"~iJ!;${\1";1'i'r(,{ii~t~jlijj:~~~~1JV,f!i~,~~!.f-~~ ,.... A 471. 01135960 L~ Lf- N3" 'l..4'r,-:-'" !'::;: P -:::. ~) 1.. _..1 '^ .d. . C__ . i - ? . L 5 . -. - " . , ; ! t I ' ... : f i ' '" t., c.. N ....J.. '. U ,_ n ,". _ G s. ) -- .J ~ , .D .... 30 L.+- ~ ....,......... -,..,..\ :s -...;.... -; J._ ~ L ,~_~hst No. 01135960 ,___ -J:>.. ~ _ \../ I ----~ / "'; M", .L. \.. ...... 4.4 4/1. 1 I j....... C,'..t / J....... L /vo. . , N31"44'OG.W (~.P. €5JJ N32'30'1 anV{ (Meas.) 011359t ....... (Q (Q f\) -~ i - ! I ....' i r- 3 8. O::f:: ;II> -;-.. I ~ I ijj I ~ (JlN N ) ~Ig; ~ o . (J) - ~ - / CD 475 ....... . ir1 c..J.. I I , ..:> l. . , 1\ I /"\ . . '-"..,- ~.A ... -..,..-,.., ,.- ;', I I I , '"'~.... \..J ~.... \..1 '-' I I \../ '-/ ,,; '-./ "J I /,,\-,- I L _ \./ I r"\ /"\ / y\ L_ '-..... ., -- ....... . 11. t .. . t Ii ,~ ----1 -'1>- .. "