03 27 2002 COW Agenda
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING AGENDA
DATE: WEDNESDAY, MARCH 27, 2002
TIME: 9:00 a.m.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
************************************************************************************************
1. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA
2. DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST AND THE GENERAL NATURE
THEREOF: - "IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ACT"
3. RECEIPT OF ACCOUNTS:
Nil.
4. DEPUTATIONS:
a) 9:00 a.m.
b) 9:15 a.m.
Donald Fenwick, Coldwater, re: hydro deregulation.
Mike Lawlor, Vice President, Branch 619, Warminster Legion,
re: request to waive taxes.
c) 9:30 a.m.
Nick McDonald, Meridian Planning Consultants, re: Permits to
Take Water process concerns.
5. CORRESPONDENCE:
a) Dr. George Pasut, Medical Officer of Health, Simcoe County District Health Unit,
re: 100% smoking ban.
b) Correspondence received to date re: 100% smoking ban.
c) Ministry of Citizenship, correspondence re: Community Action Awards for 2002.
d) Township of Springwater, Notice of Decision re: 5410 Penetanguishene Road,
Part of Lot 65, Conc. 1, being Part 5 on Plan 51 R-26561.
e) Simcoe County Federation of Agriculture, resolution re: non-support of the
proposed Nutrient Management Act (Bill 81).
f) Brian Lempriere, Oro Station, correspondence re: tapping maple trees.
g) Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority, correspondence re: Notice of
Apportionment, Capital Project.
h) Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority, minutes of meeting held on
February 22, 2002.
i) Orillia Soldiers' Memorial Hospital, correspondence re: Board representation
from Oro-Medonte.
6. FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND FIRE:
a) Jennifer Zieleniewski, CAO, discussion re: 2002 budget.
b) Jennifer Zieleniewski, CAO, report re: Council vacancy (to be distributed at
meeting).
c) Paul Eenhoorn, Fire Chief, re: "Double Hatters" and Response Times.
d) Fire Report No. 2002-04, Paul Eenhoorn, Fire Chief, re: monthly fire report for
February, 2002.
e) Fire Report No. 2002-05, Paul Eenhoorn, Fire Chief, re: A.E.D. Equipment, Base
Hospital A.E.D. Training Program and Certifications.
f) Report No. BD2002-2, Ron Kolbe, Director of Building/Planning, re: kennel
license application.
g) Report No. ADM2002-13, Marilyn Pennycook, Clerk, re: electrical distribution.
7. PUBLIC WORKS:
a) Report No. ES2002-13, Keith Mathieson, Director of Engineering and
Environmental Services, re: request for streetlights, Lakeshore Road East from
Line 5 to Line 7.
b) Report No. ES2002-14, Keith Mathieson, Director of Engineering and
Environmental Services, re: request by the Moonstone Water System
Corporation to connect to the existing Robincrest water system in the Village of
Moonstone.
Support documents for the following items (items "c" through "0") are
available in the Clerk's office.
c) Report No. ES2002-05, Keith Mathieson, Director of Engineering and
Environmental Services, re: Ms. Lynda Collins, Horseshoe Valley, request for
rebate of front-loading washing machines.
2
...
"
d) Report No. ES2002-15, Keith Mathieson, Director of Engineering and
Environmental Services, re: Annual Performance Report, Canterbury Water
Supply and Treatment for 2001.
e) Report No. ES2002-16, Keith Mathieson, Director of Engineering and
Environmental Services, re: Annual Performance Report, Cedarbrook Water
Supply and Treatment for 2001.
f) Report No. ES2002-17, Keith Mathieson, Director of Engineering and
Environmental Services, re: Annual Performance Report, Craighurst Water
Supply and Treatment for 2001.
g) Report No. ES2002-18, Keith Mathieson, Director of Engineering and
Environmental Services, re: Annual Performance Report, Harbourwood Water
Supply and Treatment for 2001.
h) Report No. ES2002-19, Keith Mathieson, Director of Engineering and
Environmental Services, re: Annual Performance Report, Horseshoe Highlands
Water Supply and Treatment for 2001.
i) Report No. ES2002-20, Keith Mathieson, Director of Engineering and
Environmental Services, re: Annual Performance Report, Lake Simcoe Regional
Airport Water Supply and Treatment for 2001.
j) Report No. ES2002-21, Keith Mathieson, Director of Engineering and
Environmental Services, re: Annual Performance Report, Maplewood Water
Supply and Treatment for 2001.
k) Report No. ES2002-22, Keith Mathieson, Director of Engineering and
Environmental Services, re: Annual Performance Report, Medonte Hills Water
Supply and Treatment for 2001.
I) Report No. ES2002-23, Keith Mathieson, Director of Engineering and
Environmental Services, re: Annual Performance Report, Robincrest Water
Supply and Treatment for 2001.
m} Report No. ES2002-24, Keith Mathieson, Director of Engineering and
Environmental Services, re: Annual Performance Report, Shanty Bay Water
Supply and Treatment for 2001.
n) Report No. ES2002-25, Keith Mathieson, Director of Engineering and
Environmental Services, re: Annual Performance Report, Sugarbush Water
Supply and Treatment for 2001.
3
0) Report No. ES2002-26, Keith Mathieson, Director of Engineering and
Environmental Services, re: Annual Performance Report, Warminster Water
Supply and Treatment for 2001.
p) Report No. PWS2002-03, Jerry Ball, Public Works Superintendent, re: Oro
District Lions Club request for signage.
8. PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT:
a) Report No. PD2002-12, Andria Leigh, Township Planner/Keith Mathieson,
Director of Engineering and Environmental Services, re: Lake Simcoe
Environmental Management Strategy (LSEMS) year end report, 2001.
b) Report No. PD2002-14, Andria Leigh, Township Planner, re: parkland appraisal
for draft approved Horseshoe Valley Estate Subdivision (43-0M-20011), Conc.
4, part of Lot 1 and 2 (Oro).
c) Report No. PD2002-15, Andria Leigh, Township Planner, re: proposed rezoning
for Trinity Community Presbyterian Church, Conc. 7, Part of Lot 21 (Oro),
development application P-104/01.
d) Report No. PD2002-16, Andria Leigh, Township Planner, re: Committee of
Adjustment decisions for March 14,2002.
9. COMMUNITY SERVICE:
Nil.
10. ENVIRONMENTAL TASK FORCE:
Nil.
11. ADDENDUM:
12. IN-CAMERA:
..
a} Jennifer Zieleniewski, CAO, discussion re: property matter (Edgar).
'"
4
lCi'd lblL'1.
,
Y ,/'rY~\ ).
J\ LJ
~\y\ ,.f\ \(/'o
. v f); \ (\, !
\ () \0 J
\ r, J\ >./ C, V /'k. \ (l-rrf
\~ \~ ,4 fY l_
1 . I( C/ '.
I\~j ".,.,c. \)
\ K ~/ .iY
(I',) 0
\
~
.J
Lf~
;e f,1 '''','. ~"'R~' ft M ~ 1\11 ~ -t'1~" I 0 \\~.:
r'" J'-~~~.. ~:. ~~i\ii 'tj~ Ji t~~i 1! ';'
~_:=~f~~~~>;~:~~~_i~~-:=~~;~~----
I (.,0: 1'1'" ;';:.) t..) ,..t <,,)t I /;;. (7) .1. tV r,...", r f/ 1-" ,.i~. ..'..";.'... ..:....1'."""..-.
1---.-----.---- - ---- . .i---~-,_..--.-~..~-.-t,;-- .._,.,..i.-,.__\,_,-,~__.."_""",,,,""'_;,,;,..c., ,.
r .j, ~
~ F'sx ~ ~j ~-J,... ~1( "'''7.- ,) } ::;.1 ~7:.
L;."'__._...........,..._._..,~.____J1N'__........'~~...._.::'_-.:..........____~...::~.......,......,........---"~-.....-..__.....,............_-
I "
, !r,' Ii -....,. " -.- I
: r'fom: Ii ()[) {)i'1.c....!"':J I"-t=r),...]"',,.,\.
~--""-'-''''-1~-'-'''::;::-~''''__'_''::::'''_''''._':' ...._.__.-,...-,.~.-: ._-..-- _...-.._--.---_.- - - ....- .-.....---. ..-.,--.-- - n - -_.~-
I S b' 1 Ii I i ( i I. ..
l~,-~}-~.~~--.\L.-C~EU'~--E~-~~ r''':->1-:-::_L:'~'!,:,{} ~._.._....._.__._....... ---
.-_...- --.-.-.......
-. .... -..-....... --.",-..-..-.--..-*...---
,...."-.-...--...
No. pag.es inciuding cover rHh9"'";
. ..----...-.-.-.--,
()rigina! to foHow by rn~i!:
--
~ !
uJ G'I),.d
l \ ~?-{
-tp
e lfi i-~ ,{;,
;/
4-
J
a.
J f) f i(
i
,L i ,,"
.~ ..~ I" ~
"-f-*'l"
1 ",j
j
, J
"r- Tt.,z
:.....:.. >1' 1 I' ;~i .
-\J. ..e~:7
I! "
r
~:~. T"
. J
r~r1 -~i.,.
\ j,
11 ,) \.~
~) t1.
~-'Vt (i ,~.,
"')
'i.:....p 02..
i/') '.i /,
, .
II... ./.,
~'i' ;," ,,1,"'1 Jf.~.,
6(p;z'.-"'z::..~~':~.:;2_- .
CONF'JDENTfJH..JTY NOnCE
ThIS tBx frsl1smii;Slon lHuy '~I1{,.ii..} perSOf1si or c.,nlf(jiJ"ti/;! iI't!orr:;~rr,o(~. It. i$ altc/idGti .(joiy hH 'J,-';.e c; t.'I''; ,)df.!r?::>sr:.'e nanl!?(j
9t'JQVe_ J( },,!)U ;tr~ not ins jH'iend~.;;f addre$st-a.. :!iny I.Jiacia.~u(e~ copying, (;,r Q'i:sfnbutiof1 Qf {he InrI,.1(i1~dh:~r:. n; ti1P. ta~'lng e.f :,;ct.iC'f1 In
rgjisncfl an il, is $!r!t::tiy pn,1hibifed l:y IheMunicipa! f"reodofJ] ';1t InlG'rmativn i}ca1 ,~"~ctecii(Jn ,'j Prj:..'.j(.'J' A.ct. if V,;:u ha\!~ f{}(":f'i\u~d
this fax J'n error, pfe8$e aavis!I fi."J~ !iE-t'lder irrunedlr}t!(:!y. by ti)f€pl7one caJ! C'r~ f/J.~, in iJfr2[1g€ -",y rht. r(;-f~!'t~ :?' [I!,.. !s,....' :nr.J(n~~[;c:n.
I'h/llJk yo" for }'G ut' caop,<!ratit:;n.
T0/T0 . d
Z'30:3- 9;~~~ ':';:216
-~:C;'::1j,~'-~O,J . d ,n"l" r'j . U
:71-' : b~::! E[10E-c' r -.doL.,1
5:"'~C_1fi \~3;~:- _...,~
.I
/g?-O/35
ih
~7'. '
. I C,.J.
C-A 0
OR (:) ~ .fII.IE 1) C A..)'/ E ,..,- CA...J P
7r'leu, /.y _
'"
ON pE/-f,Q.LJ= C5r -rH~ /fe> YA'- <!-An../PD~A.n/
.? L:f C ) D,0 /.3 ;1 fi yJe /...t 1.0 ( <1 J' W I'?' t< yY? ~,4).$ ---I ~ f"'l -
tJ E t...<.J' S H "/ I;) y'YI A )1:"1E rr r-;)E ~ ul' r:?- 7' I cl.x..J r D
C!o u IVc! 1<..... 6.nJ rr"fi ~ ~ / ,,- 0 ;4 S' 1<(" C'C>V,l0~t' t-
f b [..(..) A I vlC THE rY7v A.J/ C / //AL.. ~b /<",/1 O,JV .6;C
--r .A- 'J<€ 2)
.6 N 7/-/ E ;:;J-c:> c 2. -(A -x: ~ I L"- L
m l1<:".6
LA W L.~ ~ V I ~ JE ?t'!.J:!'.5. tL:> I ~~
,
y3E
7:)O/N <t;. r/-fE ;D;ec5 ;:;r.)rAT/~/U,
//r(/f;cJ)C "76 LA' #
-;-6> C!bAJr//Z.h-'<- P,LGi4.5E C,AL..L 3d;)5-655"Y
'"
10 39t'd
SNI It'JIWONO:)3
SE:SP-6C:E:-SI:3L
Sf:St:' 6cf: S0L
P0:0T C:00C:/PT/E:0
'4'
L/c -I
() t1I~J1!!AH
Page 1 of
Date:
Jennifer Zieleniewski,
CAO - Township of Oro-Medonte
Nick McDonald
January 23, 2002
To:
From:
Subject: Township Concerns over PTTW Process
Job Number: 1460
I have prepared this memo in response to your request for our comments on the current Permit to
Take Water (PTTW) process and how it can be improved to perhaps better deal with issues of
concern to the Township of Oro-Medonte, This memo briefly describes the PTTW process, the
shortcomings of the process, how the process can be improved and suggests a possible
resolution for consideration by the Central Simcoe Mayor's group.
CURRENT PTTW PROCESS
Section 34 of the Ontario Water Resources Act (OWRA) requires that a Permit to Take Water be
issued for any water taking in excess of 50,000 litres per day. The permit is required whether the
source is ground water or surface water.
The Ministry of Environment (MaE) typically requires applicants to apply for a PTTW before any
waterwork construction is initiated. The applications for a PTTW must include accurate
information on the location and the proposed quantity of the taking and if applicable, any
information about the water storage, use of ponds, pumping tests or existing problems.
Applications are submitted to the MaE Regional Office, The Regional Office reviews the
application for completeness and then posts the application on the Environmental Registry under
the Province's Environmental Bill of Rights (EBR). Anyone with access to the internet has access
to the Environmental Registry, No other notice is provided. It should be noted that most
municipal water takings, takings for the irrigation of crops and takings of less than one year in
length are not posted on the Environmental Registry,
All PTTW proposals are posted on the Environmental Registry for public comments for at least 30
days, After the 30 day period has passed, the MaE posts a Decision Notice on the
Environmental Registry. The Decision Notice indicates whether or not a permit has been issued
and why, When a decision is made, any residents of Ontario may seek leave to appeal the
decision, by serving written notice within 15 days of the decision date. The appeal must be
Page 1
113 Collier Street, Barrie, Ontario l4M 1 H2
Phone: (705) 737-4512 Fax: (705) 737-5078
.
se~ed upon the Environmental Commissioner, the MOE, the proponent and the Environmental Llc ~ ~/
Appeal Board. The leave for appeal must demonstrate that:
a) there is a good reason to believe that no reasonable person, having regard to the
relevant law and any government policies developed to guide a decision of that kind,
could have made the decision; and,
b) a decision in respect of which an appeal is sought could result in significant harm to the
environment.
The appeal would be dealt with by the Environmental Review Tribunal (ERT), In recent years, a
number of PTTW applications have been appealed and dealt with by the ERT.
CONCERNS WITH THE PTTW PROCESS
In January 2001, the Environmental Commissioner of Ontario (ECO) prepared a brief to the
Walkerton Enquiry on the PTTW process, The ECO reviewed a number of PTTW decision
notices and their associated permits to determine the quality of information in both. The baseline
assessment also attempted to determine the impacts and implications that deficiencies would
have on public comment rates and ecosystem management. The follow-up assessment was
more specific in that it reviewed decision notices and permits only for the purposes of determining
whether problems identified in the baseline assessment were continuing or not.
On the basis of this review, the ECO found a number of inconsistencies and deficiencies with the
process, These are reproduced below:
. Some registry notices included inadequate or inaccurate descriptions of PTTW proposals
and permits, included ambiguously or incorrectly reported sources of water and
inaccurately or inconsistently reported water quantities;
. MOE staff who administer the PTTW program use metric and imperial measurements in
proposal and decision notices and this makes tracking, assessing and managing water
resources more difficult;
. There is evidence of regional differences in PTTW evaluation by MOE staff, resulting in
regional variations in PTTW administration;
. Takings were permitted which did not appear to take into account the quantity of water
available in particular watersheds;
. There is no clear evidence that MOE consistently applies an ecosystem approach to
assessing PTTW applications and issuing permits.
According to the Standard Development Branch of the MOE, "an ecosystem approach to land use
planning would provide early and systematic guidance on the inter-relationships between existing
and potential land uses and the health of ecosystem over time. This approach is based on the
recognKion that ecosystems have limits, especially in terms of the stresses that they can absorb.
There is growing evidence that too much stress can irreversibly degrade or destroy ecosystems, "
Page 2
113 Collier Street, Barrie, Ontario L4M 1H2
Phone: (705) 737-4512 Fax: (705) 737-5078
-----
L f '<
7C --./
On the basis of the above, the ECO concluded that the information generated by the PTTW
process "could not be relied upon to:
. Enable the public to make informed comments on PTTW applications;
. Enable MOE, Conservation Authorities, municipalities, members of the public and other
stakeholders to develop regional and historical overviews of water taking trends;
. Allow stakeholders and water users to know how much water is actually being taken
and/or how much water is available to take in any given area; and,
. Permit the verification that the PTTW program is operated in accordance with Ontario
Regulation 285/99 (Water Taking and Transfer Regulations), For example, it is nearly
impossible for the ECO to determine whether a key requirement, 'protection of the natural
functions of the ecosystem is being achieved. "
The ECO brief was presented to the Walkerton inquiry in January 2001. The inquiry has yet to
release its findings and recommendations on how the process can be improved.
SPECIFIC CONCERNS IN ORO-MEDONTE
There have long been concerns about the issuing of PTTW's in the Township, particularly on the
Oro Moraine. At the present time, the Oro Moraine serves as a major recharge area for a number
of rivers and stream in the area, In essence, the Oro Moraine is the heart of a natural heritage
system that extends far beyond the Township's borders,
It is our opinion that every effort should be made to consider the impact of any water taking on
this ecosystem before additional PTTW's are issued. Specifically, there should be a mechanism
In place to assess the cumulative impacts of water taking's in a defined area on the function of
the ecosystem. At the present time, it does not appear that this assessment is carried out by the
MOE. when applications for PTTW are reviewed, This sentiment is shared by the ECO,
I n addition, it is our opinion that the MOE should directly involve the public and municipalities in
:he decision making process. It is recognized that any resident and any municipality has an
ability to comment on an application for PTTW through the EBR process. In addition, it is
recognized that any resident or municipality can seek leave to appeal any decision to issue a
PTlW to the Environmental Review Tribunal. However, municipalities and residents alike have
to be very aware and vigilant on the posting of applications and decisions on the EBR website, It
IS my opinion that there should perhaps be a public meeting process similar to the process under
the Planning Act, to give interested residents and other parties an opportunity to discuss an
application in an open and transparent public forum, Such a public process would be of benefit to
everyone involved, and would ensure that the ecosystem and the cumulative impacts of water
takings were considered,
On the basis of the above, it is suggested that the MOE be asked to:
Page 3
113 Collier Street, Barrie, Ontario L4M 1H2
Phone: (705) 737-4512 Fax: (705) 737-5078
~ .
1. Ensure that the cumulative impacts of water takings in a watershed are considered ij C ,<j
before individual applications for PTTW are considered;
2, Ensure that the impacts of any water takings on the features and functions associated
with the ecosystem of an area are considered before individual applications for PTTW are
considered; and,
3, Establish a public meeting Process similar to the Planning Act at which applications for
PTTW can be dealt with in open public forum, ,/
I look forward to discussing this further with you. If you have any questions, please give me a
call,
Yours truly,
Nick McDonald, MCIP, RPP
Partner
NM/jrw
Page 4
113 Collier Street, Barrie, Ontario L4M 1H2
Phone: (705) 737-4512 Fax: (705) 737-5078
~ ~t.RS IN fj
.~.,. SIMCOE COUNTY
i:1 r:~ DISTRICT HEALTH UNIT
~~ II ~ 15 Sperling Drive, Barrie, Ontario L4M 6K9
v/1,try DIStP,\C'\ ~
MEDICAL OFFICER OF HEALTH
Dear Mrs. Pennycook:
,/
!) a/I
March 4, 2002
Mrs. Marilyn Pennycook, Clerk
and Members of Council
Township of Oro-Medonte
P,O. Box 100
ORO, ON LOL 2XO
I am writing to provide you with infonnation related to the cost for health unit enforcement
as well as an educational campaign for a 100% smoke-free bylaw in your community,
We know that 100% smoke-free bylaw implementation strategies require a concerted effort
over the first two to three years of implementation, In particular, enforcement and
education must be intensive for the first year. As you know, the health unit has extended
an offer to all municipalities to provide staffing for bylaw enforcement activities, as well as
support through the implementation of educational campaigns. In addition to education and
providing proactive enforcement, we anticipate that our staff will be involved in
responding to ongoing questions, concerns and complaints from the public. These activities
have been endorsed by the Board of Health and will be supported through the health unit
budget.
There will be no additional charge to municipalities for enforcement services, including
any legal fees associated with enforcement activities undertaken by the Health Unit.
Should the Township ofOro-Medonte choose to accept the health unit's offer, we would
be pleased to speak with you about establishing a process by which our staff may be
appointed for the purposes of enforcement of your bylaw. The health unit will conduct an
ongoing assessment of the supports needed by municipalities to maintain compliance with
the smoke-fee bylaws, with a more fonnalized review anticipated in the fall of 2004.
Weare also now in the process of developing a broad education campaign, including
media advertising, promotional tools and information kits. We would also like to have the
opportunity to meet with you to discuss this campaign in more detail.
Please contact Christine Bushey, Manager, Chronic Disease Prevention Program, at (705)
721-7330 ext. 376, if you have any questions or would like to arrange a meeting to discuss
these initiatives further,
...2
BRANCH [Collingwood
OFFICES: 280 Pretty River Pkwy. L9Y 4J5
TEL: 445-0804 FAX: 445-6498
[ Midland
1156 St. Andrew's Drive, Box 626, L4R 4L3
TEL: 526-9324 FAX: 526-1513
( Orillia
575 West St., S. Unit 12, L3V 7N6
TEL: 325.9565 FAX: 325-2091
[ Cookstown
25 King St., S., Unit 2, LOL 1 LO
TEL: 458-1103 FAX: 458-0105
/
!) q~}-
- 2 -
Thank you for your ongoing work in supporting smoke-free bylaws to protect the health of
residents and visitors of Oro-Medonte Township,
Sincerely,
~1'J
George Pasut, MD, MHSc, FRCPC, F ACPM
Medical Officer of Health
GP/CB/ca
<r
,
/1
!) / .
. D, I
100 % Smoke-Free Bylaw
Mr. Frank Lawson Ms. Eileen Murray Ms. Irene Cole
Compo 720 R.R.#2 Compo 113
R.R # 2 Hawkestone, Ontario R.R.#3
Hawkestone, Ontario Shanty Bay, Ontario
LOL 2LO
Mr. Bob Murray
Mr. Ed Graham R.R.2
R.R#3 Hawkestone, Ontario Ms. Julia Crawford
Hawkestone, Ontario R.R.#3
LOL 1 TO Ora Station, Ontario
Ms. Margaret Aubin LOL 2EO
15 Price Drive
Ms. Catherine Graham R.R.#2
Comp.204 Orillia, Ontario Mr. John Crawford
R.R.#3 39 Ridge Road West
Hawkestone, Ontario Oro Station, Ontario
LOL 1 TO Ms. Madeleine Rowe LOL 2EO
R.R.#4
Coldwater, Ontario
Ms. Phillis Newton Jay Anderson
R.R #3 25 Hickory Line
Hawkestone, Ontario Ms. Linda Burton R.R.#4
LOL 1 TO 41 Georgian Drive Coldwater, Ontario
Warminster, Ontario
Mr. Allan Newton Ms. Kathryn Johnstone
Comp.612 Mr. Bill Bonesteel 25 Hickory Line
Hawkestone, Ontario 1103 Woodland Drive R.R.#4
Coldwater, Ontario
t.,1 r. Ted Michener Mr. Don Childs
1 h Greengables Box 508 Mr. Perry Bull
R.R.#2 11 Ellen Drive
Coldwater, Ontario Moonstone, Ontario
M r. Walter George Cartmill LOK INO
~5 Allen Street
Ilawkestone, Ontario Ms. Donna Bonesteel
1103 Woodland Drive R. C. M, Calautti Inc.
RR #1 'R.R # 1
I\1r. Lloyd Stockdale Oro Station, Ontario
R.R. #2 LOL 2EO
Compo 533 Mr. Sean Thomas Ball
2 h Charlotte A venue 35 Simcoe Street
Mr. & Mrs. Fendly
32 Elvyn Cres.
C. D. Newton Mr. Lanny Cole Oro Station, Ontario
Shanty Bay, Ontario Compo 113
LOL 2LO R.R.#3
Shanty Bay, Ontario Mr. & Mrs. Rayfield
LOL 2LO RR #3
Coldwater, Ontario
LOK lEO
/// r)
..::J 6 ,- c:r- -
Registered Nurses
Association Of Ontario
438 University Avenue
Suite 1600
Toronto, Ontario
M5G 2K8
Ms. Anne Kal1in
205 Candlewood Cres.
Waterloo, Ontario
N2L 5T3
Mr. & Mrs. Robertson
R.R.#1
Hawkestone, Ontario
LOL 1 TO
Deal Mayor Ian Beard and Members of Council:
Dear Mayor Ian Beard and Members of Council:
The 100% smoke-free bylaw, when passed will protect me from the
hazards of second hand smoke. I thank you for your leadership to date in
protecting the health of our community.
Please vote in favour of a 100% smoke-free bylaw for Oro-Medonte.
I fully support a 100% smoke-free bylaw for public places and
workplaces in the Township of Oro-Medonte.
The 100% smoke-free bylaw, when passed will protect me from the
hazards of second hand smoke. I thank you for your leadership to da
protecting the health of our community.
/ Please vote infavour of a 100% smoke-free bylaw for Oro-Medonte.
I fully support a 100% smoke-free bylaw for public places and
workplaces in the Township of Oro-MedoI1te.
Name: !::'/?.IJJJA LlJuJ5o~
Address: 6>~biI ,.11. 2- -W",.v4:J r~~"
Signature: i<: -- ,~"'(/ . . Dnte: Fe b (, /01.
cnmmen'J:::Ji l::j;:~,J,.~s.1~ wLo~
t{J ~ . .em, ~ u:I~ . 'k. ,...,
(I.. ~ Yh~' 9 :L-p 'Y'<- be>::Ie k ~
~. @!J I
Name: S ~) G I[' 0-.. \.-<.'11.. vv"-
Address: R"%l),/LU;) 'f:-<L7\o"""- () .~C>, V;L
Signature: ~ Date: v:~ (, - ~
Comments:
Dear Mayor lan Beard and Members of Council:
Dear Mayor Ian Beard and Members of Council:
I fully support a 100% smoke-free bylaw for public places and
workplaces in the Township of Oro-Medonte.
The 100% smoke-free bylaw, when passed will protect me from the
hazards of second hand smoke. I thank you for your leadership to date in
protecting the health of our community.
Please vote infavour of a 100% smoke-free bylaw for Oro-Medonte.
I fully support a 100% smoke-free bylaw for public places and
workplaces in the Township of Oro-Medonte.
The 100% smoke-free bylaw, when passed will protect me from the
hazards of second hand smoke. I thank you for your leadership to da
protecting the health of our community.
Please vote infavour of a 100% smoke-free bylaw for Oro-Medonte
Signature:
Date:
-- f
~;c. 47TG:I\;'71().1~ TO
~tL~C~
Name: f 'Ea(l ' '/. /. - -
Address ,,;;'".3 l, ,jE-r;;;z;
Signature: flu; I:'t..rl if'" ~T;ro., Da'T.JJ ,,{; 1.2.
Comments: ~
~
\
(,A,.)
.' d d J<\e",ber' of couocll:
Deaf Nla-yof laU Beaf aU
100'1 ,{I\ol<e-!ree b~la'" for poblic place' aDd
1 fn\\Y snppo.rt a .,.. 0 h" o( oro_MedO{\tC.
workplaces ,n the lawns \l'
.' d '-'1m protect rnC (ro\n tne
'lbe 100% ,IUOl<e-free byla"" "'~~~':::~oo for yoOl \..det,biP to date in
ba""rds of second band ,{I\ol<e. .
protecting tbe bealID of oor co_""'t'!.
. fi .r 0 I 00% s",oke-free bylaW for QrO- Medon,e.
please vote 111 avour OJ
.-" 0 -z?
~a\11e'.
j\ddress:
Signat\1re:
Cop:\p:\ents:
.' d d J<\e",bers of council:
Deaf Nla-yof Ian Beaf an
" 100'/' ,IUOl<e- ftee b~la'" for poblic place' aod
1 fn\\;r s\.1\'1'o. ta\1e 'Townshi1' of oro_Medonte.
workplaces \{\
,eO aSsed ",ill protect {l\e !ro{l\ tbe .
lbe 100% ,{I\ol<e-!ree byla"" "'i b;OI< yoO for yoor l..der,biP to date '0
ba""rda of ,econd band ,{I\ol<e. t .
p,otocting IDe bealtb of oof co_on't'!.
. fi .r 0 J 0iJ% s",oke-free bylow for oro_Medonte.
please vote 1/1 avour OJ
~ r
.,LJ.....rYf ;.,t.-
. ' () c.. I (...K' - -
Na{l\eJJ-~<{t> >' I~w-rrk. ~t:,
j\ddress:~Q (~"r.{V' " "7/7 ~ ,/- -<''\~./'
k '/ I pate: · . '" v ~
Signat\1rtY- - V..A1fL
CO\11ments:
7'7
_//.:
fJV'j..j6."" "'" -yOf Ian 1>"'" - {or pnon\,; \;W
ar tn-a free b)'\aW e
a 1 00% sp:\~ke- f Oro_Medont . t \1\e fro\11 tr
1 fUn)' supp~rt tne 'Townsh\P 0 sed will prote~ adership to I
workplaces \n b'\l\aW, when p~ )'on {or )'our e
oke-free) ke '1 than
'The \OO%/:cond hand s:~ co~p:\unit)'. for oro_MedOJ1
hazards.o :he nea\th of 0 ke-free bylaW
1'rotectlng t .r a 100% slflO
'J1favour OJ
please vote I
'Na\11e'.
j\ddresS:
Signature:
Co\11p:\ents:
.' .. b of couoell:
Dear J<\.~or \ao \leard .od ",e'" ers
f \blic places and
"a 100% ,{I\ol<e-free Wa'" or P'
1 1U\\;r sU\,,\"o. .,.. h o{ oro_Medonte.
",orl<place' ,0 tbe ,0"'0' ,p .
d wi\\ protect \1\e frol1\ t
lbe 100'/' ,{I\ol<e-free byla"" ",~e~ 1"';;00 for yoor l..der>biP to
ba""rd' of ,ecood band ,{I\ol<e. t aO
protectiOg t\te \tea lID of oor co_oo,t'!.
. fi r a J 00% s",oke-free bylaW for Oro- Mede
please vote If! (ivour OJ
i
Na\11e:'
j\ddrcss:
Signat\1re'.
Cop:\p:\ents:
Dear !Aoyor lou Beord oud !Aetube" of couucil:
I fully ,up!"''' a 100% ,mol:e-f"e bylaW fo' publiC place' and
workPlace, in the 't own,hip of QrO_Nted01'''''
't\>C 100% ""nl:e-f,ee by low, when p"',ed will prot";'t ~e ~?mt~h~te in
h",.rd' of ,econd bond ""ol:e.l thonl: YOU fo, your ea ers Ip
p,otecting the health of au' eo_umty.
please vote in favour of a 100% ,make-free bylaW for oro_Medonte.
C. ;J ,v ~1()IJ
'> H It tv"" -1 fJ f','f
Name:
Date: ..,
Addres~""
Signature:
comments:
Deor !Aoyor Iou Beard ond !Aembe" of council:
\ fully ,uppo" a 100% ,mo\<e-f"e bylaW fO' public piace' and
wo,\<place, in the 'towoship of O,o_Ntedonte.
d w' n protect me fron\ the
The 1 00% sn1oke~free dbyla,,:: W~~~~::~yseO\1 f~r your leadership to date in
hazards of second han smOl.\.e. .
p,otecting the \>Calth nf our cnmmumty.
. r. .f 1 0001 srYIoke~jree bylaw for oro~Medonte.
please vote 111 Javour OJ a 70
Name:
AddresS:
Signature:
comments:
Dear Nlayor \an Beard and 1Y\et1\u....-
\ folly ,np!"''' a 100% ,m?l:e.f"e bylaW fn< public place' and
wor\<place' in the 'townshtp of Qto_NtedOnte.
The 100% ,mol:e- free bylaW, when pas,ed will p,otect me fr?m th~ .
hazard' of second hand ,mo\:e. \ thank yon for your leadershtp to ate t
p,ote<ting the health of our community.
Bleas< vote in favour of a J 00% ,",~ke-free bylaw for Ora- Medante.
l
Name:~
Address: 11
Signature:
comments:
~.~
ate.
Dear !Aoyor lou Beard ond !Aembe" of Council:
\ fol\)' ,uP!"''' a 100% ,moke.free bylaW fo' public place' and
workPlaces in the 'tnwn'bip of oro_Ntedonte.
d 'n protect n1e fro111 the
The 1 00% Sl110ke~free bylaW, whe,n p~se ~t, yoU, leaders\rip to date in
hazards of secnnd \rand ,mol:e. \ t "n yoU 0
protecting the \tealth of our co_uotty.
please vote in favour of a 100% ,moke-free bylaW for Oro- Medonte.
Name:
AddresS:
Signature:
comments:
t1"...
d d Nle1J.\bers of Cound.\~
De~r Nl~)lor Ian 'Be~r ~n
\OO'/. ,",oke-free bylaW {or poblie placeS aod
IfunysU\W~rta .... 0, "nl"lfOfl"\\':'\"\\\':
wotkplaces ,0 the ,o"os '"
. ." \ ,\\ \)111\':':\ \n': \\11\\1 th':
b' ,w,,,,:n I',\~~I.:\ \\ \ d .
lhe 100% s",oke- free y ,,,. I th'Ok YOU (o' yo"t\e,de[ShiQ to ,te ,"
hazards of second \\and smoke. .
p,otectiOB the health o{ OU' c","",uo,t)'.
,r. O{ 0 100'/0 ,rnoke-free byloW for Oro- Medoo,e.
p lease vote IT! J avour
Dear Mayor la. \\eard a.d 1',<".-
f br c places and
\ (ully support a \00% so,oke.{"e bylaW or pu )
wod<placeS io the 10woship o{Oto-!>\.edoote.
d 'n rotect me from the
lbe \00'(' _ke-{"e bylaW, when pasSe ~t ~our leadershiP to date in
ha2l"tIs o{ second hand ,",o\'.e. \ than\'. yOU 0'
proteCting the health o{ oU' co_untt)'.
., or of 0 100% ,rnoke}ree byloW for Oro- Medoo,e.
please y,ote /I'IJavo
Name'.
AddresS',
Signature:
comments',
Yj
Dear Mayor Ian \\eard and Nlember' o{ Council:
.... \n"" smo\'.e-{ree hylaW {o' puhlic placeS and
\ t\.\\\Y SUppOl' a VV to d
wo,\'.placeS io the 10"",,hiP o{ O,o-!>\.e onte.
assed will protect me from the .
lhe 100% ,",o\'.e-{,ee bylaW. wheo P \'. ( ,yoU' leadershiP to date ,n
ha""tIs o{ second hand ,",o\'.e.\ than yoU 0
p,otecting the health o{ out co",",un)ty.
pleose vo,e 10 fovoor of 0 100% "ooke-free byloW for Oro- Medoo,e.
counci\~
bers of
~nd Nle1J.\ . laces and
\~n 'Be~rd Cor p\.\bhc p
"''' )lor bylaW t
De~r tn~, oke-tree donte. . 11\ the .
a \5i1/; sm. of oro-t-Ae tect 11\e fr~ 0 date In
t \\y s\.\pport ~ownsh1P ed wi\\ pro \eadershW t
\ \.t ,\rn\aces in t e \ w when p~~~ou for yo\.\r
WOU-"", e by a , \ t\lanl'- J
oke-fre oke. , >J donte,
\: \ O()% S11\ d hand sm rn1.1\\\n1.t'j. r. r orO-LVLe
l1e t secon f o\.\r CO bloW JO
\1aZards 0 \. e \1.ea\th 0 ,oke-free Y , 6(, '
\ , g tit 00% srrl
nrotect1n {a 1 ~.. /
'" . fi YOUr 0 ,J2.~ .
PleasevoteJrl a _Ii /7 ,~~ }I!J!
~~., /)rl. I~
Narne:~ "2. W~. Date: -
Address:
Signature'.
comments:
~
Cb JtiL.)Jer
Dear Mayor Ian Beard and Members of Council: .,
I fully support a I Q~ smoke-free bylaw for public places and
workplaces in the TQwnship ofOro-Medonte. '
The 100% smoke-free bylaw, when passed will protect me from the
hazards of second hand smoke. I thank you for your leadership to date in
protecting the health of our community.
Please vote In favour of a I 00% smoke-:fr~e byla:" far Orn-Medonte. .
Name: .J)o;J,J/4 ~-Jt5. .57:'~t=L' ~ ~
Address: I~ P;i] .'1> _:/
SIgnature: .Ll ' ate: W" / ~..!> '
Comments:
\
\
,.
~\
t;-~
"
~,
Dear Mayor Ian Beard and Members of Council:
Dear Mayor Ian Beard and Members of Council:
I ftdly support a 100% smoke-free bylaw for public places and
workplaces in the Township of Oro-Medonte.
The 100% smoke-free bylaw, when passed will protect me fi'om the
hazards of second han.d smoke. I thank you for your leadership to date in
protecting the health of our community.
I fully Support a 100% smoke-fi-ee bylaw for public places and
workplaces in the Township of Oro-Medonte.
The 100% smoke-free bylaw, when passed will protect me from
11azards of second hand smoke. I thank you for your leadership tc
protecting the health of our community.
/ Please vote in favour of a 100% smoke-free bylaw for Oro-Medo,
Please vote in favour of a 100% smoke-free bylaw for Oro-Medonte.
Name: YJ/J f..' (J"l../Z" .
Address: 0~ A!Jt d '5 -S)/,4"w:Y ~.Y OM
) ik ' ,.!.. CJ,,-,J~
Signature: " Date: l:', i>/o>/ '
Comments:
Signature:
Comments.;
Dear Mayor Ian Beard and Members of Council:
Dear Mayor Ian Beard and Members of Council:
I fully support a 100% smoke-fioee bylaw for public places and
workplaces in the Township ofOro-Medonte.
The 100% smoke-free bylaw, when passed will protect me from the
hazards of second 11and smoke. I thank you for your leadership to date in
protecting the health of our community.
DJ( :z .L: t)
I fully support a 100% smoke-free bylaw for public places ani
workplaces in the Township ofOro-Medonte.
The 100% smoke-free bylaw, when passed will protect me fre
hazards of second hand smoke. I thank you for your leadershi
protecting the health of our community.
Please vote in favour ofa 100% smoke-free bylaw for Oro- M.
Name ~~ ~ 13
Address =tS'iry'iE t- 1]
Signature: - - ~ _ -LL _ Date: iJf~
Comments: ~U ~
7VtJW-1 ~
. ,j.....
· ~ C>o
Please vote in favour of a 100% smoke-fi'ee bylaw for Oro-Medonte.
Name:
",,1 I . ae.rd .nd Me",,,ers 01 C01lnc\l:
Dear ruayor a.. v
... \00"' s",oke-Iree b~I.", lor public places aod
l fully S\.\ppOli a 10
",orkPlaceS io tbe10",osbiP o[O<o-M"IoOtc .
, ""cd "ill protect ,TIC Icc"TI the .
1he 100'/' s",oke-[rce b~la'\:. W~~~ ;'k yOU [or ~our leadership to date to
b,"",ds 01 secood baod S"'O e. ra .
proteCtiOg the health 01 our co ",",UTI'\)' .
please vo,e i a favour of a I 00% ,,"olre-free byla'" for Oro- Medaote.
Dear ~a'Yor Ian Beard and \."I.,.,....~
I {ul1~ sup~rt . 100'/' SOlo"e-Iree h~I.", lor Vuolic places .od
, th Townshio of oro_Medonte,
worKplaces \n e t'
assed will protect rtie frorti the
1\Ie 100'/' sfj\O"e-lree oJ"''''' ",heO V k lor Jour leadershiV to da>
h,""rOs 01 secood ha1\d sOlO,e. 1 thao ~ou
protectiOg the health 01 our co"""UfO\)"
Please vote in favour of a ] 00% ,malre-free by 10'" for Oro- Medonte.
.I
1'1artie:
hddress:
Signature',
Cortirtients'.
1'1artie:
hddresS:
Signature:
CortirtientS:
~
Date:~
d d ~emberS o{ CO\lnd\~
Dear ~a'Yor Ian BeaT aU
f blic places and
I {u\\~ support a 100% SOlO"e-!r<e b~la'" or VU
",orkplaces io the 1o",oshiV o[ Orc-lAedoote.
o ",sed ",ill protect ",e {roOl the
1he 100% sfj\O,e-{re< b~la"" ",~eh p ,~ou lor ~our leadersbip to da
ba",rtls olsecood haod sOloke. t'O
.roteCtiOg the health 01 our COOl"''''''\)''
, I f Oro_Medonte
p lease vote in faVOur of a ] 00% ,,"oke-free by oW or
Signature:
Cortirtients'.
De.r MaJor \an Beard and Me",,,e" 01 C01lnci\:
f \\ ort' 100% ,""o"e-lree b~la'" lor poblic places .od
1 u '1 supp , f 0 _Medonte.
",orkpl'ces io the10",,,,h1V 0 ro
assed will protect rtie frorti the ,
1he 100'/' so",,,e-{re< b~I''''' ",~e~ p , ~oo lor ~ooJ leadership to date '0
h,""rtls 01 geeood haod sOlO,e. t"'O
protectiog tbe healtb o[ our co"'"'UfO\)"
please vote in favour of a 100% ,,"oke-free bylaW for Oro- Medonte.
1'1artie:
hddress',
Signature:
'\
,,,-0
__""p.ntS:
t"(
v -I
R. C. M. CALAUTTIINC.
RR#l ORO STATION
ONT ARlO LOL 2EO
(705) 487-2328
September 9, 2001
Dear Oro-Medonte Township Council,
It is my understanding that you are trying to pass a by-law that would require the
restaurants and workplaces in the municipality to be smoke-free by May 31, 2002. As a
business owner in this township for the past 26 years, I whole-heartedly agree with the
implementation of such a by-law. In my own restaurant known as "Madeleine's", I
made the decision to go smoke free October 15,2000, A truck stop that is non-smoking
is unheard of anywhere!
This was a personal decision on my part, because after working in the dining room for
any length of time, inhaling all that second hand smoke, I found that I was continually
coughing, especially first thing in the morning. It seemed as though I was the one
smoking two packs a day! I have never smoked a cigarette in my life, nor am I ever
going to, and I can say this with certainty! My daughter was coming to work with me in
the morning and remained there for approximately one hour to catch the bus for school.
One day she said to me that all she can smell at school all day is smoke. That was the
proverbial straw that broke the camel's back. It was then that I made my decision to go,
smoke-free,
Immediately after October 15,2000 my business seemed to suffer because the people
who came in only for coffee and cigarettes were offended and stopped coming in. A few
others also left in a huff because they could no longer light up, I thought I had made a
bad decision, It was not a decision based on economics, but on health, my family's, as
my husband is also allergic to smoke, and mine, Slowly I would see different people
coming in for food, not just coffee, People I had never seen before, who would not come
in because of the smoky atmosphere. At the end of the day I started seeing an overall
increase in my sales.
Today, I am up in sales over last year, and the customers will go out of their way to come
into a clean and fresh environment. The most common comment I receive is on the fresh
smell when people walk in. I am currently displaying crafts and pottery from local
artisans on consignment as a sideline, something I would never have considered before,
The restaurant does not require painting every year because there is no nicotine film
anywhere, so I am saving money there!
. ...
!:~'/o-~
The biggest reason I think public places should be smoke-free is the children, They
cannot speak for themselves, however, if I can be so adversely affected by tobacco, how
are little children affected? It is totally unfair that they are made to endure such abuse.
Please consider the health benefits that this by-law will have on all the residents of the
municipality, the patrons, the employees who, out of necessity must work in a smoky
environment and most of all the children, When making your decision, vote to support
the Simcoe County Health Unit in their efforts to make Simcoe County smoke-free,
Breathing easy,
'--1
.//
.//1
t.:/' -.
/7 /} ~.~
i ai:{;ld_/C.(~-'
Maria Calautti
//
!) b.-II
September 9,2001
Township ofOro Medonte
R. R. # 1, Oro Station
Ontario, LOL 2EO
Re: 100 % Smoke. free Bylaw
Dear Mayor and Council Members
We are writing in support ofOro Medonte council passing a 100% smoke-free bylaw to protect
the health of all the people who live, work and visit Oro Medonte. The extensive evidence on the
negative health effects of secondhand smoke makes action to protect the health of adults and
children in all public and work places imperative.
We are in support of a 100% smoke-free Oro Medonte not only because we believe it
demonstrates that our municipality is taking a progressive approach to protecting health, but
because such a bylaw sends a clear message to our young people to stay smoke free. We need to
be sure that the example we set and the value we put on health is consistent with the education
messages we pass on at home and at school. Only then will we be able to have significant impact
on decreasing the numbers of youth who get addicted to tobacco and on the unnecessary deaths
due to tobacco use.
Oro Medonte offers its residents and visitors many things that fit with a healthy lifestyle and a
healthy environment. One hundred percent smoke-free public and work places are a logical and
important feature that we need to build into making this municipality a great place to live, work
and play.
Weare looking forward to progressive action taken by Oro Medonte council in response to the
recommendation of Simcoe County's Medical Officer of Health that all municipalities in Simcoe
County pass uniform 100% smoke-free bylaws to take effect on May 31, 2002, A coordinated,
collaborative approach countywide will strengthen the health impact and make the transition to
smoke-free work and public places easier for all.
We strongly recommend council adopt a motion to begin the process of establishing a 100%
smoke-free bylaw for Oro Medonte at the September 12th meeting when the Simcoe County
Health Unit makes a deputation to council. We eagerly await the outcome of this upcoming
council meeting,
Yours truly, "
-2J(V4c)f\- }- ~ )1-14-
Shawn & Tom Fendley 7'1
32 Elvyn Cres.,.Oro Station.
!J/1
! ' ,...,
D " / tI-~
RR#3
COLDWATER, ON LOK 1EO
September 12, 2001
Mayor Ian Beard & Members of Oro-Medonte Township Council
Box 100
ORO, ON LOL 2XO
Re: 100% Smoke-Free Bylaw
This letter is in support of the deputation for a 100% smoke-free bylaw
for Oro-Medonte Township.
To protect the health of their residents, other Ontario municipalities have
implemented 100% smoke-free bylaws. Local governments have taken
action and passed bylaws that protect residents, visitors, and workers
from the harmful and deadly effects of environmental tobacco smoke,
We all know that exposure to second-hand smoke causes lung and other
cancers, heart disease, increases children's risk of asthma, bronchitis
and ear infections, Everyone knows someone who has died from cancer,
The Occupational Health & Safety Act lists 15 substances that have no
safe level of exposure - 6 of these are found in tobacco smoke, What
other evidence is needed before all public places and workplaces are
made smoke-free?
Let Oro-Medonte Township be a leader in Simcoe County to not only
!Jsten to the advice offered by the Medical Officer of Health, but to act on
1 t and follow it, Take whatever action is necessary to ensure a healthy
community environment and pass a bylaw making public places and
\\'orkplaces 100% smoke-free,
r [-!PI
/J6
Peter & Gina Rayfield & Family
'~~:. RNAO
Registered Nurses
Association
of Ontario
i--I ~'
~rh_.13
L'Association des infirmieres
et infirmiers autorises de
[' Ontario
Huronia Chapter
~'~~TF?"f"S~..
''''... . 'i" 1 ,~'; j 0,/,. '~..
?n'.';'.'\~. ~ i..LuJ!'",. / I'r'~
I;~ -.~J..l.- '_)_.'1 ~....,,:.,:.:,.
'/,,;,~'~:~'. ~<~<.~><.-,~.:.
,~~ , ."<:~,, ,
15$ ''"-{',t,
~?f 0;" ,.,,' ;>
~~. ;~~~,
January 23, 2002
Mayor Ian Beard and Members of Council
Township of Oro-Medonte
PO Box 100
Oro, ON LOL 2XO
Mayor Beard and Council:
'-"'--~~.:.:;~"....'"'''~'''
Re: 100 % Smoke Free Bvlaw
As representatives of the Huronia Chapter of the Registered Nurses Association
of Ontario (RNAO), we fully endorse a 100% smoke free bylaw in all public
places and workplaces.
As health professionals, we observe the conclusive evidence illustrating the
serious health consequences of smoking and exposure to environmental tobacco
smoke (ETS),
With the health of your constituents of utmost importance, we strongly encourage
your Council to enact a 100% Smoke Free Bylaw.
Yours truly,
~~
1~~'
~/~~D
Cheryl Behan, RN, BScN
Grillia, 325-3384
Nancy Menagh, RN, MEd
Grillia, 327-3105
Nancy Sutherland, RN, BScN
Grillia, 325-9859
438 University Avenue, Suite 1600, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2K8
phone: 416-599-1925 toll free: 1-800-268-7199 fax: 416-599-1926
www.rnao.org
vee. tV - ~&J~. :);/02
L'/ / ,{,r
vb '" l-!
Anne Kallin
205 Candlewood Cres.
Waterloo, Ont N2L 5T3
February 25, 2002
\
."::
Ian Beard, Mayor, and
Oro-Medonte Council,
Township of Oro,
P.O. Box 100,
Oro, Ontario LOL 2XO
\,-'.,< <..
Y~j ,_,
"'~_-i:~;i i ~::,',' ',.,.,.
.....~~~;L!~i},;
Dear Mayor Ian Beard and Oro-Medonte Council members,
I wish to strongly advocate that you institute a No Smoking ban for all public
places in Oro-Medonte township.
My family and J regularly visit your area, for recreation and to visit family
members. Coming from Waterloo region, where a smoking ban in public places
(restaurants, public venues, etc.) has successfully been in effect for a couple of
years now, it feels very strange - in a bad way - to attend events in Oro-Medonte
where smoking is allowed. Aside from the fact that smoking is a very nasty habit-
-- smoke gets into one's hair and clothes, one has to be always breathing smoky
air - smoking poses severe and well-documented health risks. Even Sudden
Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) has been linked to smoking. Having smoking and
non-smoking sections has always seemed to me rather like having urinating and
non-urinating sections of a swimming pool: everything always mixes in the end.
Smoking in public is simply now a rude and passe intrusion.
In addition for our family, my mother, who lives in Oro-Medonte, hasa severe
allergy to smoke and simply cannot be in an area where smoking takes place;
this drastically restricts our family's participation in social events, which my
parents would very much like to attend, My uncle living in Oro-Medonte is on
oxygen much of the time and obviously has to choose very carefully where he
goes,
It is time that Oro-Medonte move into modern times and ban smoking in public
places, Thank you,
Sincerely,
/: --L/ '_'.
C~.~? ~_
Anne M, Kallin, 8,A., F,L.M,I.
V~'J'~' '-"'0 ~- %
. ~=.=-- - . M. d
61 ,., . \ \ Q . OJ '1 t~ '"?
/K \ '~" , ~ ' 'ill ,; i <? r- 0 L-
'" '....~,..' '\ \ \ )~...: .1 i ~ I T::'<.,::~ .
".".,,, ..'I'Y;>: 6i/
. .....>... .,<../.;", L j' ,--
...~,y' .....;"".7", { D / "'").
" '~/)' 'I ~
Nelson and Margaret Robertson, '. . '-:.::~ .
R.R.# I, Hawkestone, ..::.cr;"
Ontario LOL I TO . ',=,
~" <.:-''4{t;
February 26, 2002
---
.. '''-::.,,'
, .~ ,"
"'-.-',
..
Mayor Ian Beard and
Oro-Medonte Council,
Township ofOro,
P.O. Box 100,
Oro, Ontario LOL 2XO
Dear Mayor Ian Beard and Oro-Medonte Council members,
We are in favour of a NO SMOKING ban in all public places in the Township ofOro-
Medonte.
As caring members of our society, we want our public places to be safe, healthy places
for all citizens. There have been many studies completed over the years, which fully
document the extremely negative effects of smoking and of second-hand smoke on
people's health. Cigarettes contain many carcinogens and are toxic almost beyond
belief. Aside from the major health risks to society as a whole, presented by permitting
smoking in public places, the cost to society of paying for medical treatment for
individuals who become ill from smoking is staggering - smoking either causes or
aggravates many diseases, including about a dozen kinds of cancer, heart disease, stroke
and numerous lung diseases, to name but a few conditions.
As individuals, we have severe allergies in our family to cigarette smoke, so our
enJoyment of public places is very limited. Even five minutes in a smoky environment
can trigger a severe sinus infection and related symptoms. This is a distressing situation
fur us, and we're sure for many other individuals, in that we want to attend social events
hut for health reasons, we cannot.
Pkase pass a NO SMOKING ban for all public places in Oro-Medonte Township, for our
~a~c, for our families and for society as a whole. Thank you.
Smcerely,
"J'" r ~
E-" '-:? '
, / Ilj~A' . '
Nelson Robertson
0i/1{j ~ 4- j~
Mar'~~~bertson
Minister
Ministre
~
~
Ontario
/
6c~/
\
Ministry of Citzenship
Ministere des Affaires civiques
6th Floor
400 University Avenue
Toronto ON M7A 2R9
Tel.: (416) 325-6200
Fax: (416) 325-6195
6" etage
400 avenue University
Toronto ON M7 A 2R9
Tel. : (416) 325-6200
Telec. : (416) 325-6195
March 2002
Dear Friends:
I am pleased and honoured to announce the Community Action Awards for 2002,
Through these awards, the Province of Ontario recognizes individuals who have endeavoured
to improve the lives of persons with disabilities and make Ontario a better place. I invite you
to participate by nominating a deserving individual who has made a difference for persons
with disabilities in Ontario.
Each spring, 15 Ontarians are chosen to receive the Community Action Award. These are
individuals who have made a significant contribution to their communities by promoting
integration and independence; showing commitment and dedication to developing the potential
of persons with disabilities and improving their quality of life; and demonstrating leadership in
preventing and removing barriers that impede the full participation of persons with disabilities
in our society.
The deadline for returning the nomination fonn is April 19, 2002.
F or further infonnation, contact Ontario Honours and Awards at the Ministry of Citizenship:
,(416) 314-7526,
Thank you for taking the time to nominate a deserving individual for a 2002 Community
Action Award.
Sincerely,
Cam Jackson
Minister
_.
""
",,-;'0';'-'- '--~:~<-:;i
.- >_i',:',.:,-. '"'--~-'-.'.i>. _..,'".'.:..,,_,_ _:..:_ _:.': _:',', .. ,,_:.d~_
':',"-"'-"',:.:. .:.' ',,"'>,'-' -:""-;::"'; .."...._._, :0'>.;>
',.'F'c'::-' ,<-:,::}::i ':(}':"'. ":::'_:,-,
c"tj,ft\N\ tJN ITY A
a
Purpose
The Ministry of Citizenship is
committed to promoting the dignity,
independence and potential of
persons with disabilities in Ontario,
Each year the Provin6e of Ontario
presents the Community Action
Awards to people who are
dedicated to promoting the
acceptance and participation of
persons with disabilities in their
communities. The awards
recognize individuals who are
forging new roles, initiating new
programs and policies, and
spearheading the widespread
changes taking place around
issues of access, services,
supports and rights for persons
with disabilities in communities
across Ontario, Since 1987, the
Community Action Awards have
honoured individuals who, through
their leadership and commitment,
have been instrumental in effecting
positive change for persons
with disabilities,
Who is eligible?
The Community Action Awards
are presented to persons with or .
without disabilities who have made
a significant contribution to
promoting access and equal
opportunity for persons with
disabilities, or who have shown
commitment and dedication to
developing the potential of persons
with disabilities and improving their
quality of life.
In the past, recipients have been
individuals who, for the benefit of
persons with disabilities, have:
· Initiated activities and programs;
· Helped to establish accessible
services, such as, transportation
and barrier-free policies in their
communities;
· Organized support groups and
improved services;
· Created partnerships between
the disability community and
other sectors, such as,
business, schools, hospitals,
municipalities, etc.;
· Represented the interests of
persons with disabilities as
board members of community
agencies; and
· Designed and implemented
products and programs; and
spearheaded promotional events
and activities to showcase the
abilities of persons with
disabilities.
How are the award
recipients selected?
The award recipients are selected
by a committee of representatives
from the disability community, who
are appointed each year by the
Minister of Citizenship. The
committee reviews the
submissions and selects the
fifteen recipients from the
numerous nominations
received, Nominations may
be made by any person or
organization wishing to recognize
a deserving individual in their
community. Posthumous and self-
nominations will not be. accepted,
When are the awards
presented?
The awards are presented at
a special ceremony held in
Queen's Park in the spring,
The fifteen award recipients and
their nominators will be notified
by phone in advance of the
awards ceremony,
When is the deadline?
Any person or organization can
nominate an individual by
completing the following
nomination form and sending it to
the address below, no later than
April 19, 2002. Photocopies of this
form are also acceptable,
Need more information?
Further information and additional
nomination forms may be obtained
from:
Ontario Honours and Awards
Ministry of Citizenship
400 University Avenue, 2nd Floor
Toronto, Ontario M7 A 2R9
Telephone: (416) 314-7526
Fax: (416) 314-7743
TTY: (416) 314-7491
Or visit our Web site at
www.gov.on.ca/mczcr
Please note:
Alternative formats available
upon request.
0,/ n
~ ""\
C~'
"
tIt'?~Q\l,'~,:.'~.<t.::,~. _$~Z:
'-.". 7;;~k
""" ;;-;Z,,:~,
/f:~;;t-c " - ~
tt~,
. vC -'-II
~- Ontario
NITY ACTION
awards
Personal information on this form is collected under the authority of the Ministry of Citizenship and Culture Act, R.B.O. 1990, c.M. 18, sA
and will be used to determine eligibility and notify recipients of the Community Action Awards. For additional information, please contact:
Manager, Ontario Honours and Awards, 400 University Avenue, 2nd Floor, Toronto, Ontario M7A 2R9 Telephone: (416) 314-7523
PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT CLEARLY AND COMPLETE IN FULL.
Individual Being Nominated:
Title
First Name
Last Name
Name of Organization
Position
Address
CityfTown
Province
Postal Code
Telephone No. (9:00am - 5:00pm)
Nomination Submitted By:
Fax No.
E-mail
"",
Title
First Name
Last Name
Name of Organization
Position
Address
CityfTown
Province
Postal Code
Telephone No. (9:00am - 5:00pm)
Fax No,
E-mail
Signature of Nominator
Date
In addition to completing the form, please see the reverse side of this page for additional material
to be included in your submission.
Nomination Form
/"''' ---
L'.r? _L"
0",-, <......-,
In addition to completing the form found on the reverse side of this page, please
provide a brief description of your nominee's activities and the contribution he or
she has made for persons with disabilities. Please note that the selection of award
recipients is based solely on information provided on this form.
Please include the following in your submission:
1. Description of achievement:
a) Describe the achievement in detail, including any background or historical
information related to the achievement;
b) Describe what made this an outstanding achievement for your nominee, including
any extraordinary circumstances or challenges the nominee faced,
c) Describe how this achievement has touched the lives of others or the life of the
individual being nominated.
d) In'dicate how long you have known the nominee.
e) Indicate when the achievement was initiated and completed.
2. Two Written Testimonials
3. Additional Material (optional)
List any additional material provided to support this nomination. For example,
additional testimonial letters, publications, media stories, etc.
'"
Please submit signed nomination form and support materials to:
Ontario Honours and Awards
Ministry of Citizenship
400 University Avenue, 2nd floor
Toronto, Ontario
M7 A 2R9
Deadline:
Completed forms must be received
by April 19, 2002
5d-1
NOTICE OF DECiS!()N
FiLE NO, A04102 (JANDA)
IN THE il/i/"rrER or an application to the Cornmittee \,\f f\dj,ustmen: o'f
Springwl~ter TOVd'\sh;p under Sed;c~n 4z'> of th..:', P!.anning Act of Ofit~3r;c>, RS,O,\S9G. C.P. 13, as
amended, AND !'~ THE M.c,',TrER {J1 an app!icaLion fOf approval of a vari81"'iCe frcfr :~(Jcl:km 2.4,3(08)
of Zoninq f.;y-L8N '; t1'i;lO-22 8S arnE.nded for the former Township of Medon~e, for p,operi:y \oc~ted
in Part 0: L.ot 05, C.Of,G68sjon 1, being j';)arl 5 en Plan 51R-2656i and k,nown municipa\ly as 5410
Penetanquishafj.;; r~'!.)ad. 'The varlaf1ce rejate~, to minimum lot frcJntage
TAKE NOTICE t1l8t die Committee of Adjustrn~;nt, having held a public meeting ,~m W)!? 6th day of
March, 2002 m~k~ the following decision:
~~ISI9J1;
That tht; Cfj;t,mltt.s4& ,.i)f Adjustment, having completed a site inspaeti(.>n, noting
corresp{)ndenGi,~ recolved and it'l';'} evidencE< presented ;and having regard tCI the matters .!!;et
out In SI;1!.~tjon 45 ("n of the Planning Act, R.$.O. 1990, .:;;.P.13 as amended, han!lby APPROVe.
the appHcatit)r, for mh)QY variance as applied for:
MINIMUM 8..,1[,)1 FRCHUA.GE RE(jUIREO
PR:OPO;~;!;.t\
~40 METRE~~
29,128 ME'H'U'::,s
CorrHnitte(~ in r{,;Jkjn~j Ul{;i~ decision have considered and had regard to the fc,..r i~~sts dted in
Sc..C.'If"\n /.!{:-(1) C~ th.e. P'la~l~i;n/'1 Ar.t R:J ."; co) 199('1 ,. F) 1 r, ""c:: ~mend~d
.. v \,. "'" I ..,.,..1, 1.. ,1;0-. 1, t::,t ...,,,,, .::::>..,1-. '. ,v. . i ~ (;1_ C1 - -" .
Th~ to:lowing e~:tracts (sub$~ctions 12, 13 and 14) cl Section 45 of th~~ Planning Act H.S.O. 1990,
c.P .~, uS amended, reads as foHcws:
,,(,~ :.:., ~,'3 afJp"cant, the Minister or any other person Of public bDdy wt1Q I,as i3ii interest in this
i:12t1.er rnav v'Iithin 20 days of the maKing 01 the decisic)n appeRI to the Munic:::ipa'l Board
:-'P :1im;t the dE~cisj(,n of the Committee by filing with the secretary.treasurer (?f th.e Committee
;:, rotice uf appeal setting out the objection to the cledsion and the reasons in support of the
objection accompanied by payment to the secretary-treasurer d the fee pre;sc:ribed by the
Municipai Board under the Ontario to/!unicipal Board Act as pc)y8<ble on an appeal from a
committee of adjustment to the Board,
(' j) rhs secretary-treasurer of a committee, upon receipt of a nc;tice of .appoa~ filed under
sUbsection (12), shall forthwith forward the notice of appeal and the amount of the fee
r.lentloned in subsection ('12) to tt~e Municipal Board by register,e<l mail together with all
pcper$ and documents filed with U,e committee of adjustment relating tCJ the rnat1er
appealed from and such other docum€mts and papers as may be required by the Board,
(14) If within suer. 20 days no notice at appeal is ~Iiven, tile decision of the committee is final :and
binding, and the secretary-treasurer shall notify the appEcant and sh~\1I file a (~e!1jfi6d copy
of the decision with the clerk of the municipality,I'
e /'?r 3~'1 d
~~dfS:C 'O-G~-~'1N
':LS698?i.SOL
:OSifi.: .L3f'!-J3S'11 dH :;,e ...N:
~
!) ol- ;)--
TOWNSHIP or ~SPRJNGVi,~TEn. fiLE NO, AQ4!02
CO~MiTTEE_or: ADJU~T~Et'lT __^_~_...______ (JANQ~L._________,,____.____
f~OTE;_
The Ontario Munh::lpai Eloard's 1ee for 3n apP.EH)ij \$ $125.0i}! payable by
ihe appeUcu1t Such a.ppeals are to be sent by REGISTERED MAH.., or
OELiVERED PERSONALLY to;
The Se>cre~;'lry"Tre~surer
Committee t/f Adjustment
Township Qt Springwater
SImcoe County AdministratJon Centre
1110 HIghway 26
MJDHURST, Ontario LOL IXO
NOT~
Ai, c;-,t;:ques are to I.)e made payable to '!he "Minister of Finance".
THE LAST DAY ;:OR APPEAL IS ~--4~ d.c", ~ ~6Q..:l.... __,'
The file is avaiiable for Inspection at tile Township ot Springwater, Lower East Wing, County
Admini$traiion Ce:\itre, 'Iii 0 Highway No. 26, MidtlUrst. Ontario ouring regular office hours, Monday
to Friduy, '::30 a. H,. k 4:30 p.m.
CERTifiED TRlW COpy Of
THIS t-iOTnCE Ot': DECISION
WAS MAltED TO THE APPLICANT
ON -;-"'r:/~_Dp.Y OF.-,:!l/u:XH._~__,
20t2. '
" ;:/7
~~ .' ,'j"
.....-.: :L..-t>f' /~
--' .-:_~~-:-
Le()l')a~ G. Campbell
-~-------_....-...__...._~_...""'"
K. Elaine Cairncross, Si1cnrtary
Committee ot: Adjustment
Ji;l.') .........-,.=
(.r'-~'
. ..........-.------..---
Reg wan
I'
~
~ ; \
"""~ .~ --~~'
BriiJlI Fraser
./) t1 t7
., I
" JI j/.:
__f:tu'1:-I~
Paul Townes
~~~_.
TOl1lf...Hbpe ....
C'IC' ':!C)\1,.1
~W~~G:~ zo-z~.~y"
:LS696i::LSOL
~os~c 13r~3SVl dH :^6 l!
!9L~ IV.)'.. I
L 6e,.
S~ ~ 'JeeWt4Uu Dj ;'/",,~e
~\\~ CO//.
~ \ 1/ ~
~ ~
.-......~
~ ~
% ' ~
~A' Of ~~
ADMINISTRATIVE CENTRE MIDHURST, ONT. LOL 1XO
March 11, 2002
Oro-Medonte Township
Box 100
Oro, Ontario
LOL 2XO
4......-0
;d '?\\
@" ~;? "C>
~, :;0 0'.;.
.,'c:., r '.....)::
"'C1~ ~ ;r ?\
';~?;:~!).. ~f:;:~\(::)
./ A. -;.',:~, '7<,' ,,'_.:i
~ ? "'''', -' .~
.4.(' -1-: .~~ /' ~
Directors of the Simcoe County Federation of Agriculture passed the attach:" .' I 7r' . . I(..\) ~
without dissent on March 7, 2002
i
I
Dear Mr, Craig:
No information accompanying Bill 81 gives clear indication of the occurrences which the
legislation is designed to halt or to prevent. While we recognize a need to remove the disparities
introduced by the diverse municipal bylaws affecting farm livestock, we contend these bylaws
were passed to placate an anti-livestock bias of a vocal minority. We find the attempt to disguise
livestock restrictions under the broad misnomer of Nutrient Management offensive and
detrimental to the future of livestock agriculture in Ontario,
We believe all nutrients - regardless of source or circumstance of use - should be managed in
a responsible manner. As farmers, we recognize livestock manure is just one of many nutrient
providing materials, Indeed, some Ontario farms have been successfully using manures to
improve crop growth for 200 years. In other parts of the world, this activity has been
commonplace for many centuries. Manure, we know, has other characteristics which need
diligent oversight. We applaud those farmers who have invested heavily in manure storage and
application equipment and in livestock management for the sole benefits of capturing more of
the benefits of manures with their crops and of preventing injury to their environment.
Legislation is already in place to address pollution incidents. Bill 81 does not define the
additional deeds it will punish. Why not? We fear it is the wedge which will be used to drive
livestock farming from Ontario, Our provincial government is reducing investment in
agricultural research, one aspect of which is soil and nutrient management, so how will farmers -
and society - be assured that practices to manage manures and other nutrient sources are the most
appropriate? The majority of farmers are conscientious manager of manures as well as other
nutrient materials, We advocate a combination of continuing research and extension activity
which will improve nutrient and manure management.
Yours truly,
=:tPi J:f.-tV~
Bob Nevison, President
Simcoe County Federation of Agriculture
Serving Simcoe County Since 1940
".
,r
;(:J
"-
~\\~ COI/.
. ~ ,,\ '// ~
~ -<
........~
~ ~
~ ' ~
~;f Df ~~
s~ ~ ';eetua-ti4Ie ~ ;'/~~e
ADMINISTRATIVE CENTRE MIDHURST, aNT. LOL 1XO (705) 726.9300 Ex\. 224 Fax (705) 722-5511 Email: scfa@drlogick.com
Simcoe County Resolution
Be it resolved that the Simcoe County Federation of Agriculture take a
stand of non-support for the proposed Nutrient Management Act (Bill 81,
and so infonn the Ontario Federation of Agriculture, until such time as the
fanners of Ontario are assured that
· all sources of nutrient into our environment are viewed identically,
· livestock fanns are not subjects of increased scrutiny that differs
from that given to other animals or to other sources of nutrients,
· sizes of livestock enterprises be limited only by the area of land
available to receive manure ftom these livestock,
· land lease arrangements for manure application are equal to land
ownership,
· any and all enforcement personnel will have significant agricultural
training or experience,
· programs are in place to train and certifY those who would offer a
service of nutrient management plan development,
· al1 fanners shall have the right to prepare their own nutrient
management plan and that OMAFRA will provide training
opportunities for such farmers to learn the procedure, and,
· no municipal bylaw which limits manure application to less than the
nutrient requirements of the prescribed crop is valid.
Serving Simcoe County Since 1940
98YlC7JUV ..z:0./fb!l!r7lffeJ;QleJ;
RR#l ORO STATION
LOL 2EO
(705)487-5152
(705)487-6547
March 12. 2002
~t'
MADAM SECRETARY,
WE HAVE BEEN TAPPING THE MAPLE TREES IN THE COMMUNITY CENTRE IN
THE VILLAGE OF EDGAR FOR THE PAST 8 YEARS
THIS YEAR JIM & PAT SHELLSWELL ADVISED US THAT WE WOULD HAVE TO GET
PERMISSION FROM ORO TOWNSHIP,
WE WOULD LIKE TO CONTINUE TO TAP THESE TREES IN THE FUTURE,COULD
YOU PLEASE CONTACT US ON YOUR DEClSSION AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.
SINCERL Y
BRIAN LEMPRIERE
RR# 1 ORO STATION
LOL 2EO
. '
,;..
Est. 1960
Harold M. Parker, Chair
Chris Carrier, Vice-Chair
Wayne R Wilson, c.A.O.
Our Member
Municipalities
Adjala-Tosorontio Township
Amaranth Township
City of Barrie
Town of Bradford-
West Gwillimbury
Town ofCoJlingwood
Town of The Blue Mountains
Clearview Township
Essa Township
Town of Innisfil
Melancthon Township
Town of Mono
Mulmur Township
Town of New Tecumseth
Oro-Medonte Townsh,p
Municipality of Grey Hip;hlands
Town ofShelbume
Springwater TownshIp
. Town ofWasaga Beach
Watershed Counties
County of Simcoe
County ofDufferin
County of Grey
"f.~, 5q-/
Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Auth'6rity
366 Mill Street, Angus, Ontario LOM IBO
1EL (705) 424-1479, FAX (705) 424-2115
Website Address: www.nvca.on.ca
ISTERED MAIL
15 March 2002
Township of Oro-Medonte
Box 100
Oro, On
LOL 2XO
;,
~"
.,
Re:
'......
Notice of Apportionment - Capltal-'Project
This is to advise that on 8 March 2002, as per Sections 25 and 26 of the
Conservation Authorities Act, the Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority
(NVCA) approved the new administration office complex capital project
apportionment, as per the following Resolution:
MOVED BY: Chris Carrier
SECONDED BY: Robert Waind
WHEREAS: As on February 8, 2002 the Full Authority approved
the new administration office complex project as a capital project
under Section 26 of the Conservation Authorities Act; therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED THAT: for clarification purposes, the
proportion of the total benefit afforded to each municipality of the
Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority as per Section 25(1)
of the Conservation Authorities Act, will be apportioned at the
General Benefiting Current Value Assessment apportionment rate
as described in the *February 8, 2002 Full Authority resolution.
This apportionment reflects the general benefiting principle of the new
administration complex in that all municipal members of the NVCA receive benefit
from the administration complex project. The apportionment is based on the most
recent Current Value Assessment (CVA), utilized in calculating the general
benefiting levy in the 2002 budget as per attachment A-2, first column of the
approved budget title CV A percentage, Please also note that the most recent CV A
will be utilized as per the *February 8th Resolution,
It is anticipated that the exact dollar amount of your municipal capital project will be
known by late 2002 and will be forwarded to your municipality early in 2003 as your
capital expenditure share owing the NVCA. For planning purposes at this point, the
administration office complex capital budget estimates the total NVCA municipal
share to be $401,400. which will be apportioned, as described above, to our 18
NVCA municipalities.
cont'd.. ,
Building Partnerships With Our Community for a HealtJ!)' Water.rhed
Help us achieve our goals by becoming a member of the
Nottawasaga Valley Conserva.tion Foundation
5q~J-
; ,
v
pg.2
We look forward to the completion of this capital project on time and on budget. The
new administration facility will enhance the NVCA's ability to provide service,
As a reminder, we confirm that this project received Minister's approval under
Section 24(1) of the Conservation Authorities Act in 2001, Your municipality is no
doubt aware of the substandard condition of the previous office and the obvious
need for functional facilities. The Authority appreciates your cooperation and
understanding in your dealings with us while we work out of temporary trailers.
Please contact Wayne Wilson at extension 225 should you have any questions.
Harold M, Parker
Chair
Wayne R. Wilson
CAO/Secretary- Treasurer
wrwlsmr
c: Susan Whitters, Manager of Accounts-
Mr. Gary Luhowy, NVCA Solicitor
Full Authority
att. *copy of resolution
A-2
..
.
, .
(
'.
(
<'
/'
f.-..-'
J.....
"-...../.
NOTTAWASAGA VALLEY CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
Full Authority #2/02
DATE: February 8, 2002 NO. ''7
MOVED BY: &j ~
SECONDED BY: ... ..,;, ~
WHEREAS: The Full Authority approved on Dec ber 7, 2001, by ion No. 13, the new
administration office complex project and assoc' te.d budget; therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED THAT: Staff and the Executive prepare for the Full Authority, the estimated
amount of the special administration complex capital levy required by our municipalities to
cover the levy portion of the new administration complex; and,
THAT: The exact special administration complex capital levy final amount be determined
following the completion of the new administration complex, estimated to be late October
2002, and forwarded to the Full Authority in early 2003 as the special administration~
utilizing the 2001 current value assessment if available by December 1St 2002, or the 2000
C.V.A. which was utilized for the 2002 NVCA Budget; and,
THAT: The special administration complex capital levy shall be collected by the municipalitYi
per Section 26 of the Conservation Authorities Act.
tJ
N
I
J' ~
\ Z
f''r.. W
V') :E
.(" J:
) U
<t
l-
I-
<t
per Constituent:
New Tecumseth Town
Adjala-Tosorontio Township
Amaranth Township
Banie City
Collingwood Town
Town of the Blue Mountains
Innisfil Town
Clearview Township
Essa Township
Melancthon Township
Mono Township
Mulmur Township
Oro-Medonte Township
Grey HigWands
Shelburne Town
Springwater Township
Wasaga Beach Town
Bradford W. Gwillimbury
revision: 2/02
r-
."...
NOTTAWASAGA VALLEY CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
2002 BUDGET LEVY
CVA%
Busic Operations
Matching
Basic Operations
Non-Matching 2002 Healthy Waters
2002 Capital
2002 Total Levy
2001 Total Levy
$ 127,401.00 $ 573,624.67 $ 197,962.87 $ 100,000,00 $ 998,988,54 696,355.00
$ 0.72 $ 3.22 $ 1.11 $ 0.56 S 5.61 4.06
15.4"195% 19,644.60 88,450.06 30,524.88 15,419.50 154,039,04 108,025.55
5.6447% 7,191.40 32,379.39 11,174.41 5,644.70 56,389,91 39,199.22
0.2639% 336.21 1,513.80 522.42 263,90 2,636,33 1,852,30
14.0155% 17,855.89 80,396.37 27,745.49 14,015.50 140,013,24 92,130.55
11.1011% 14,142.91 63,678.65 21,976.06 11,101.10 110,898,72 79,192,28
1.4395% 1,833.94 8,257.33 , 2,849.68 1,439.50 14,380.44 8,188.44
4.8894% 6,229.14 28,046.80 9,679.20 4,889.40 48,844,55 32,825.48
6.8062% 8,671.17 39,042.04 13,473.75 6,806.20 67,993,16 47,748,37
8.1612% 10,397.45 46,814.66 16,156.15 8,161.20 81,529.45 60,640.68
0.5430% 691.79 3,114.78 1,074.94 543,00 5,424,51 3,999.86
4.3396% 5,528.69 24,893.02 8,590.80 4,339,60 43,352.11 31,356,17
2.2378% 2,850.98 12,836.57 4,430.01 2,237.80 22,355.37 15,938.17
2.0508% 2,612.74 11,763.89 4,059.82 2,050.80 20,487,26 14,347.00
0.4669% 594.84 2,678.25 924.29 466.90 4,664,28 3,295.15
. . "
1.9475% 2,481.13 11,171.34 3,855.33 1,947.50 19,455.30 13,266.96
8.4904% 10,816.85 48,703.03 16,807.84 8,490.40 84,818.12 60,153.93
8.9606% 11,415.89 51,400.21 17,738.66 8,960,60 89,515,37 61,991.61
3.2224% 4,105.37 18,484.48 6,379.16 3,222.40 32,191.41 22,203.28
(J(I)O; .
-,."
- . ~
~.
LAKE SIMCOE REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
, MEETING NO. BOD-02-02
51st ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING
SA,!
Friday, February 22nd, 2002 - 9:00 a.m.
Regional Municipality of York
"Seminar Room"
17250 Yonge Street
Newmarket
MINUTES
Members:
R. Bridge, Chair
Councillor M, Jordan, Vice Chair
Councillor L. Corrigan
J.O. Dales, Honourary Lifetime Member
Alderman A. Eadie
Councillor V, Hackson
Mayor J, Holec
Councillor G, Lamb
Councillor H. Lodwick
Councillor P. Marshall
Deputy Mayor S, Para
Councillor S, Pliakes
Mayor T. Taylor
Councillor W, Teel
Mayor M. Black (Proxy for Deputy
Mayor H, Vander Kooij)
~egrets:
G,R. Richardson
-Councillor N. Snutch
Mayor R. Stevens .
Deputy Mayor J. West
Staff:
D. Gayle Wood, Chie.t Aqministrative
Officer/ Secretary-Treasurer
S. Hanson,' Director of Corporate Services
A. Leach, Director of Conservation Land
Management
R. Vos, Director of Watershed Management
B. Kemp, Manager of Fundraising and
Community Relations
M. Walters, Ma~ager of Environmental
Services
H. McKinnon, Community Relations
Specialist
G, Dwulit, Community Relations Technician
G. Casey, Recording Secretary
Page 1 of 11
9
51st Annual General Meeting
Minutes
Guests:
J, Munro, MPP
B, Fisch
Mayor B, Jackson
E. Crossland
I. Buchanan
J. Cottrill
R. DeFrancisco
B.Fox
K, Hill
K.Bacon
C.Bacon
L, Bigioni
M. Britnell
A. Duffy
B, Forhan
M. Geist
N. Hunter
Mayor T, Jones
M..Kennedy
Councillor D. Kerwin
0, Maliska
T, Martin
M, Meyers
Councillor J. Morning
A. Morton
.S. Pallett
G. Price
Deputy Mayor D. Roughley
M, Samuels
S, Villani
A. Wel s
Media
Rogers Cable Television
York North
Regional Chair, York Region
Town of Innisfil
Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Foundation
Ministry of Natural Resources
Ministry 'Of Natural Resources
Bank of Nova Scotia
Conservation Ontario
Hunter Hill Law Firm '
Past LSRCA Board Member
Guest
York Region
Past LSRCA Board Member
Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Foundation
Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Foundation
Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Fund
Past LSRCA Board Member
Town of Aurora
Town of Whitchurch Stouffville
Town of Newmarket
Guest
Volunteer
Past LSRCA Board Member
Past LSRCA Board Member,
Past LSRCA Board Member
Past LSRCA B9ard Member
Ministry of Natural Resources
Town of Bradford West Gwillimbury
Township of King
Past LSRCA Board Member
York Region
~h, n ^
J ,d-
1. Chair's Welcome and Introductions
Chair Bri.dge opened the meeting by welcoming everyone and asked all of the
Board Members to introduce themselves and to identify the municipality they
represent. Chair Bridge then asked all the guests in attendance to introduce
themselves which was followed by introductions of the Lake Simcoe Region
Conservation Authority staff,
Page 2 of 11
10
Board of Directors' Meeting
51st Annual General Meeting
Minutes
February 221\d, 2002
"'/
5h<3
2. Disclosure of Pecuniary Interest & the General Nature Thereof
There were no declarations of Pecuniary Interest.
3. Adoption of the Agenda
Moved by:
Seconded by:
S. Para
p, Marshall
BOD-02-19:
'RESbLVED THAT the Agenda of the 51st
Annual General Meeting of the Board of
Directors No. BOD-02-02 be adopted.
4. Minutes
Board of Directors
Minutes of the Board of Directors Meeting No. BOD-01-02 held January 25th, 2002,
Moved by:
Seconded by:
S. Para
P. Marshall
BOD-02-20:
RESOLVED THAT the minutes of the Board of
Directors' meeting No. BOD-01-02, held on
January 25th, 2002, be adopted.
5, GreetinQs
On behalf of Karen Kraft Sloan, MP-York North, Chair Bridge extended best wishes
to the Authority for a successful 2002,
Greetings were received from Julia _Munro, MPP-York North, Regional Chair Bill
Fisch - Region of York, Deputy Mayor Susan Para - Region of Durham, MayorTom
Taylor - Town of Newmarket, Mayor Brian Jackson - Simcoe County, John Cottrill-
Ministry of Natural Resources and Bonnie Fox - Conservation Ontario.
6. 2001 Reports
a} 2001 Conservation Authority Annual Report
The Authority's 2001 Annual Report was tabled at the meeting, Chair Bridge
presented the report hi-lighting events of 2001 s.uch as the expansion to include the
Townships of Oro-Medonte and Ra'mara which resulted in Councillor Paul Marshall
becoming a full member of the Board and Coucillor Neal Snutch of Ramara joining
the Board of Directors, Also in 2001, Mayor Ray Stevens, City of Orillia, was
Page 3 of 11
11
::>10' Annual General Meeting
Minutes
SA-y
appointed in an ex-officio capacity to the Authority's Board of Directors, The
Authority's Board now has representation from every municipality around Lake
Simcoe,
Chair Bridge thanked all of the municipal, federal, and provincial partners for their
continued support of the Authority.
Chair Bridge thanked the School Boards for their help in educating students on
preserving the environment by using the Authority's facilities for field trips.
Approximately 6,000 students visit the Nature Centre each year.
Chair Bridge acknowledged the work of the Board of Directors and Authority Staff
which contributed to the Authority's success in 2001,
Moved by:
Seconded by:
BOD-02-21 :
G, Lamb
. L. Corrigan
RESOLVED THAT the Lake Simcoe Region
Conservation Authority's Annual Report for
2001 be received for information.
b) 2001 Conservation Foundation Annual Report
Mr, Ernie Crossland, President of the Lake Simcoe Regio n Conservation
Foundation presented the 2001 Annual Report hi-lighting accomplishments of2001,
The Foundation raised over $550,000 in 2001 which includes a $500,000 donation
from the R. Samuel McLaughlin Foundation,
Mr. Crossland thanked all donors for their generosity and further thanked the
Foundation Committee Members and Authority staff for their continued hard work
and support,
Mr. Crossland advised that the Foundation is currently conducting a Committee
rv1ember Drive and is pleased to report that six new members have been recruited
which results in th~ Foundation having representation from around Lake Simcoe,
r.1r. Crossland announced that the Foundation's 14th Annual Dinner will be held on
April 19th, 2002,
Moved by:
Seconded by:
BOD-02-22:
Wayne T eel
Virginia Hackson
RESOLVED THAT the Lake Simcoe Region
Conservation Foundation's Annual Report for
2001 be received for information.
Page 4 of 11
12
t:.oard ot Directors' Meeting
51st Annual General Meeting
Minutes
February 22nd, 2002
7,
j/ / r/
oh~O
Presentations
Chair Bridge announced, with great privilege and honour, that Mr, George R,
Richardson will be recognized for his more than 33 years of dedication to the
Authority and to conservation,
Mr. Richardson served on the Authority's Board for 33 years and is stepping down
from his position as representative of York Region (Newmarket).
Chair Bridge advised that due to health reasons, Mr. Richardson was not able to
attend the meeting and, for this reason, the Authority is video taping the
presentations. This tape will then be given to Mr, Richardson,
In his absence, Mr. Richardson asked that Mayor Tom Taylor accept the gifts
presented on his behalf, . .
D. Gayle Wood, CAO/Secretary-Treasurer, Lake Simcoe Region Conservation
Authority, on behalf of Karen Kraft Sloan, MP- York North, presented two certificates
to Mr. Richardson, one from Karen Kraft Sloan, MP and the second from the Right
Honourable Jean Cretien, Prime Minister of Canada. .
Julia Munro, MPP-York North, presented Mr. Richardson with two certificates. One
from herself and the second from the Honourable Mike Harris, Premier of Ontario.
Presentations were received from Regional Chair Bill Fisch on behalf of York
Region, Mayor Tom Taylor on behalf of the Town of Newmarket, Bonnie Fox on'
behalf of Conservation Ontario, Mr, Ernie Crossland on behalf of the Lake Simcoe
Region Conservation Foundation and Chair Roy Bridge on behalf of the Lake
Simcoe Region Conservation Authority.
On behalf of Mr. George F;<ichardson, Mayor Tom Taylor thanked everyone for their
kind words and gifts.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
G, Lamb
p, Marshall
800-02":23:
RESOLVED THAT the Board of Directors
conclude the 2001 business and declare the
chair vacant.
The Chair concluded the year 2001 business, A recess was called at 10:00 a,m.
8, 2002 Business
The Chief Administrative Officer qfthe Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority
called the 2002 Business Meeting to order at 10:20 a,m,
Page 5 of 11
13
5151 Annual General Meeti~g
Minutes
!J1, (p
9, Roll Call - 2002 Board of Directors
The CAO identified three new Authority Board Members as Councillor Neal Snutch,
Township of Ramara, Mayor Ron Stevens, City of Orillia in an ex-officio capacity,
and MayorTom Taylor, York Region (Newmarket), The CAO further announced that
with these appointments, every municipality is now represented on the Authority's
Board of Directors,
As round table introductions were conducted at the beginning of the meeting, they
were not repeated at this time.
10, Election of Officers
The CAO introduced Mr. Ian Buchanan, Supervisor, York Durham Area Team,
Ministry of Natural Resources. Mr, Buchanan performed the duties of Election
Officers for 2002.
Mr, Buchanan brought greetings to the meeting on behalf of Mr. Rob Messervey, .
District Manager, Ministry of Natural Resources who could not be at the meeting.
Mr. Buchanan thanked the Authority Board, Staff, Volunteers and the Foundation
for their continued hard work. Mr. Buchanan announced that the Ministry of Natural
Resources is proud to be part of the Lake Simcoe Environmental Management
Strategy - Phase III which is being led by the Authority.
Mr, Buchanan reviewed the general rules for the election process,
11, a) Appointment of Scrutineers
Moved by:
Seconded by:
L. Corrigan
H, Lodwick
BOD-02-24
RESOLVED THAT in the event of a vote by
ballot, the following persons: Mr.Ken Hill, Hm
Hunter Law Firm and Mr.' Rich DeFrancisco,
Bank of Nova Scotia, will act as scrutineers;
and
FURTHER MORE that all ballots be destroyed
after the election,
b) Election of Officers for 2002
(i) Chair of the Authority
Board Member Alison Eadie nominated Roy Bridge for the position of Chair. To
support this nomination Ms, Eadie spoke of Mr. Bridge's commitment to the
Authority in 2001 as Chair and his many accomplishments while in that position,
Page 6 of 11
.
14
""-
Board of Directors' Meeting
51st Annual General Meeting
Minutes
February 22nd, 2002
Nominations were called three times,
No other nominations w'ere received.
6h~1
Mr. Bridge accepted the nomination.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
S. Para
W. Teel
RESOLVED THAT the nominations for the
position of Chair be closed.
Mr. Bridge thanked the Board for their confidence in his leadership,
(ii) Vice Chair of the Authority
Board Member Jeffrey Holec nominated Susan Para for the position of Vice Chair.
Nominations were called three times.
No other nominations were received.
Ms, Para accepted the nomination,
Moved by:
Seconded by:
M, Jordan
L. Corrigan
RESOLVED THAT the nominations for the
position of Vice Chair be closed.
Ms, Para thanked the Board for electing her to the position of Vice Chair.
c) Appointment of Administrative Committee
Nominations were received for the Administrative Committee.
Board Member S. Para nominated G, Lamb,
Board Member V. Hackson nominated M, Jordan.
Nominations were called three times.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
J, Holec
L. Corrigan
RESOLVED THAT nominations for the
Administrative Committee be closed.
Page 7 of 11
15
51st Annual General Meeting
Minutes .
Moved by:
Seconded by:
BOD-02-25
- --' --OJ -- ,--....._
V, Hackson
W,Teel
RESOLVED THAT the Chair, Roy Bridge, Vice
Chair, Susan Para and two members GarY
Lamb and Margaret Jordan be appointed to
the Administrative Committee.
d} Appointment of the Regulations Sub Committee
Moved by:
Seconded by:
BOD-02-26
H, Lodwick
S, Pliakes
RESOLVED THAT the Chair and the Vice Chair
of the Conservation Authority and the Member
representing the local municipality in which
the fill and construction application is
received shall be Members of the sub-
committee to review applications in the field,
as such inspections are determined and
authorized by the Board of Directors.
e) Appointment to Conservation Ontario
Moved by:
Seconded by:
800-02-27
p, Marshall
S, Para
RESOLVED THAT the 2002 Authority Chair be
appointed as the Authority's voting delegate to
Conservation Ontario; and
FURTHER THAT the Chief Administrative
Officer/Secretary-Treasurer be the alternate
designate.
f) Appointment of Foundation Members
Moved by:
Seconded by:
B 00-02-28
S, Para
W.Teel
RESOLVED THAT the 2002 Authority
Chair, the Chief Administrative
Officer/Secretary-Treasurer. and
Councillor Paul Marshall, Township of
Oro-Medonte, be appointed to the Lake
. Simcoe Region Conservation
Foundation.
~
~h -?;
Page 8 of 11
16
Board of Directors' Meeting
51st Annual General Meeting
Minutes
February 22M, 2.002
g) Appointment of Solicitors
Moved by:
Seconded by:
BOD-02-29
12. Siqninq Officers
Moved by:
.Seconded by:
BOD-02-30
W. Teel
V. Hackson
RESOLVED THAT Stiver Vale, Monteith Baker
Johnston, and Hill Hunter Law Firm be
appointed as the Authority's legal firms for
2002.
V, Hackson
;H. Lodwick
RESOLVED THAT an account in the name of
Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority
(hereinafter called the "Organization") be kept
at the Bank of Nova Scotia (hereinafter called
the "Bank"); and
THAT Roy Bridge, Chair, Susan Para, Vice
Chair, D. Gayle Woo~, Chief Administrative
Officer/Secretary-Treasurer and Sandra
Hanson, Director of Corporate Services, or any
two of them are hereby authorized for and in
the name of the Organization to sign, make,
draw, accept, endorse and deliver cheques,
promissory notes, bills of exchange, orders
for the payment of money and such
agreements and instruments as may be
necessary or useful in connection with the
operation of the said account; and
THAT anyone oftl1e'above-mentionedoff;icers
is hereby authorized for and in the name ofthe
Organization to endorse and transfer to the
Bank for deposit or discount with or collection
by the Bank (but for the credit of. the
Organization only) cheques, promissory notes,
bills of exchange, orders for the payment of
money and other instruments, to arrange,
settle, balance and certify all books and
accounts with the Bank and to sign receipts
for vouchers.
5h,9
Page 9 of 11
17
51st Annual General Meeting
Minutes
13. Borrowing Resolution
5 h~/o
The Director of Corporate Services presented Staff Report No. 11-02-BOD
regarding borrowing,
Moved by:
Seconded by:
BOD-02-31
G, Lamb
S. Para
RESOLVED THAT Staff Report No. 11-01-B OD
on Borrowing Resolution be. received for
information and; .
FURTHER THAT the signing officers for tne
Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority
be empowered to borrow up to $500,000 0 n a
Operation Loan Agreement, from time to ti me
as required, for administration and/or cap ital
expenditures.
14. 2002 Meeting Schedule
The CAO presented Staff Report No, 12-02-BOD which contained information' on
the dates set for the Board of Directors' meetings and those of the Administrative
Committee for 2002,
Moved by:
Seconded by:
BOD-02-32
P. Marshall
L. Corrigan
RESOLVED THAT Staff Report No. 12-02-BOD
be received; and
FURTHER THAT the 2002 schedule of
meetings for the Lake Simcoe Regi on
Conservation Authority be approved.
15. 2001 Client Service Report & 2002 Workplan
The CAO presented the 2001 Client Service Report and the Authority's 2002
Workplan. .
The CAO extended her thanks to the management team and staff of the Authority
for their continued hard work and commitment.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
L. Corrigan
H. Lodwick
Page 10 of 11
18
!;joard ot Directors' Meeting
51st Annual General Meeting
Minutes
BOD-02-33
16. Closing Comments
February 22nd, 2002
RESOLVED THAT Staff Report No.1 0-
02-BOD be received; and
FURTHER THAT the 2001 Client Service
Report be adopted as presented.
"" l
~/ h ~ 1/
Chair Bridge extended his thanks to all who attended the Authority's .51st Annual
General Meeting.
Chair Bridge further thanked the Board of Directors for re-electing him to the
position of Chair and announced that he looks forward to a very busy and
successful 2002,
Motion to Adiourn
Moved by:
Second.ed by:
H, Lodwick
M. Black
Meeting adjourned at 11 :00 a.m,
R. Bridge
Chair
0, Gayle Woo
.Chief Administrative Officer!
Secretary Treasurer
Page 11 of 11
19
i-m !I i-' :1 <(
1 ~- =-~ 1':3
In (('"\-31 l'rl.,D il...!
U L ~\ O1IJ lS~U~
SOLDIERS'Lfin'EMORIAL
6/-/
CANADA..
~~gfZE~~~ ~.
n:J
u
c:
o
..c:
E
'"
o
:i
$
$
.
n:J
U
c:
o
..c:
E
'"
o
@)
c:
<lJ
"2
n:J
$
c:
<lJ
0-
..c:
0'1
-
n:J
E
a.,
.
'"
LJ"\
0'\
r-
LJ"\
N
'"
LJ"\
o
r-
x
.2
.
,-
o
N
'"
+-'
X
<lJ
,-
o
N
N
LJ"\
N
'"
LJ"\
o
r-
-
~
.
March 14, 2002
Acting Mayor Neil Craig,
Oro- Medonte Township Council
Dear Mr. Craig:
Thank you for providing Mr. Smale and I the opportunity to meet with you and
Members of Council on March 13th to present and discuss our Board's proposal
to expand its membership to include a representative from the Oro- Medonte
Council,
As requested, I am enclosing a copy of our 2001-2002 Operating Plan which
provides a good deal of infonnation about our hospital operations, its role and
financials. I am also enclosing a copy of our existing Hospital By-Laws section
relative to Board membership and a draft of the intended revisions.
I would be pleased to provide any further infonnation or clarification that you
may require. We look fOIWard to your response to the proposal.
"
GHP /jas
'"
N
N C.C, - Alan Smale
>
:J Karen Wilford, Chair, Board of Directors
z
o
n:J
=
'-
o
.
~
+-'
VI
<lJ
c:
'-
o
..Q
o
U
o
r-
CREATING A HEALTHIER FUTURE TOGETHI;R
.
PART IV - BOARD
/
)., / /"') /
J 1'0
10, NOMINATIONS FOR ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Subject to section 11 and all other provisions ofthis By-law, nominations for election as Director
at the annual meeting of the Corporation may be made only by:
(a) a Nominating Committee ofthe Board, or
(b) members of the Corporation provided that each nomination by members;
(i) is in writing and signed by at least three members in good standing; and
(ii) is accompanied by a written declaration signed by the nominee that he or she will
serve as a Director in accordance with this By-law if elected; and
(iii) is submitted to and received by the Secretary at least thirty days before the date of
the annual meeting,
11. BOARD COMPOSITION
(1) The Board shall consist of:
ELECTED DIRECTORS
(a) 11 Directors shall be elected from among the members ofthe Corporation as hereinafter
set forth;
(i) at the Annual General Meeting of the Corporation to be held next after the coming
into effect of this by-law, six (6) members shall be elected for a tenn of two (2)
years from the date of such meeting and shall hold office until their successors
have been elected, and, in the subsequent year,
(ii) five (5) members shall be elected for a tenn of two (2) years, and
8
EX OFFICIO DIRECTORS
6/-J
(b) the following ex officio Directors, provided that the Board shall at all times be composed
of a majority of Directors elected by means of section 11 (l)(a):
(i) the President and Vice-President ofthe Medical Staff,
(ii) the Chief of Staff,
(iii) one Director appointed by the Board from those candidates proposed by the
Council of the County of Simcoe.
(iv) one Director appointed by the Board from those candidates proposed by the
Council of the Municipal Corporation of the City of OriIlia.
(v) one Director appointed by the Board from those candidates proposed by the
members of Branch #34 OriIlia, Royal Canadian Legion.
(vi) one director appointed by the Board from those candidates nominated by the
Nurses' Alumnae Association of OriIlia Soldiers' Memorial Hospital.
QUALIFICA TIONS
(2)
(a)
No member ofthe medical staff or dental staff of the Hospital shall be eligible for
election or appointment to the Board except as where otherwise provided in this
By-law,
(b) No employee of the Hospital shall be eligible for election or appointment to the
Board except as where otherwise provided in this By-law.
(c) No spouse, child, parent, brother or sister of any person included in subsection (a)
or (b) above, nor the spouse of any such child, parent, brother or sister shall be
eligible for election or appointment to the Board, except by resolution of the
Board.
9
(3)
(a)
3// - 'f
No person may be elected or appointed a Director before reaching eighteen (18)
years of age.
(b) Except for the Chief Executive Officer and the President of the Medical Staff, no
person may be elected or appointed a Director for more terms than will constitute
ten (10) consecutive years of service, provided however that following a break in
the continuous service of at least one year the same person may be re-elected or
re-appointed a Director. A Director elected to a two year term which would
commence prior to nine (9) years' accumulated service, but whose term would
normally expire following completion often (10) years consecutive service, may
complete the full two-year term of election.
(4) A person who is not a member ofthe Corporation may, with his or her consent in writing,
be an ex-officio Director.
12. VACANCY
(1) If a vacancy occurs for any reason among the el ected or appointed Directors, such
vacancy may be filled by an eligible person elected or appointed by the Board to serve
until the next annual meeting of the Corporation,
(2) At the next annual meeting in addition to the election of Directors to fill the vacancies
caused by the expiry of Directors' terms, the meeting shall elect or appoint an additional
Director to fill the unexpired term created by any vacancy referred to in subsection (1),
13. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE BOARD
Thl.: Board shall govern the affairs of the Corporation and:
(a) Develop and review on a regular basis the mission, goals, objectives and strategic plan of
the Hospital in relation to the provision, within available resources, of appropriate
programs and services in order to meet the needs of the community;
(1'1 ) Work in collaboration with other community agencies and institutions in meeting the
needs of the community;
(() Establish procedures for monitoring compliance with the requirements of the Public
Hospitals Act, the Hospital Management Regulation, the By-laws of the Hospital and
other applicable legislation;
10
.c: ./
o / ~~
Proposed Hospital By-Laws Amendments
Part IV - Board
11, Board Composition
1 (b) the following ex officio Directors:
(i) the President and Vice-President of the Medical Staff;
(ii) the Chief of Staff;
(ill) one Director appointed by the Board from those candidates proposed by the
Council of the County of Simcoe from among its elected Council members;
(iv) one Director appointed by the Board from those candidates proposed by the
Council of the Municipal Corporation of the City of Orilliafrom among its
elected Council members;
(v) one Director appointed by the Board from those candidates proposed by the
members of Branch #34 Orillia, Royal Canadian Legion;
(vi) one Director appointed by the Board from those candidates nominated by the
Nurses' Alumnae Association of Orillia Soldiers' Memorial Hospital;
(vii) one Director appointed by the Boardfrom those candidates proposed by the
Council of Mryikaning First Nationfrom aTTlDng its elected Council. members;
(viii) one Director appointed by the Boardfrom those candidates proposed by the
Council. of the Township of Oro-Medonte from aTTlDng its elected Council. members;
(ix) one Director appointed by the Boardfrom those candidates proposed by the
Council. of the Township of Ramarafrom aTTlDng its elected Council. members;
(x) one Director appointed by the Boardfrom those candidates proposed by the
Council. of the Township of Sevemfrom aTTlDng its elected Council. members.
With the following deleted from the lead-in statement to the current By-law:
"provided that the Board shall at all times be composed of a majority of Directors
elected by means of section 11 (1)(a)"
Add all of the above italicised words to the current By-law.
't - ;
<C
-
...J
...J
-
a:
o
MEMORIAL
Operating Plan
2001-2002
April 200-1
./ /
i/ !
~ /,0
INDEX
Page
Executive Summary
1
Hospital Proflle
4
Regional & District Services
12
Tertiary Centre Partnerships
13
Other Regional Collaborations
14
Community Collaborations
15
Private Sector Partnerships
16
Medical Staff Complement
17
Strategic Priorities 3-5 years
18
Key Goals Next 3 years
24
Mission, Vision; Organization Structure
Follows 25
Community Profile
26
Programs & Services Plan
30
Human Resources Plan
38
Nursing Plan
45
Changes 2000-2001
49
Fiscal Years 2002-2004
52
Operating Plan Committee
53
Hospital Network # 1 Plan Summary
54 - 57
./
// /1
I-.. · I
o /"-r
t
.
A
0/ / C/.
I -- ,....,
. ! "\
> "-'
Executive Summary
The Hospital's physical plant and Human Resource capacity are being extremely taxed by
growing workload pressures. Additional physical plant capacity will not be available for
another five years when the approved Redevelopment and Expansion Project is complete.
The Hospital has exemplary rankings in terms of both clinical and non-clinical efficiencies
and requires a significant and immediate infusion of additional funding resources for more
staff to address bed pressures,
In-patient workload pressures are related to an increase of admissions in Medicine, Surgery
and ICU, This now requires that all available beds in the Hospital be kept open on a
permanent basis. Funding for Emergency Flex Beds need to be annualized to address this
reality. Peak demand periods not only create admission backlogs in the ER; they also
require periodic setup of temporary beds in a patient TV lounge, Last year an average of 17
beds were occupied by End Stage Renal Disease patients, 15,8 Acute beds on average were
occupied by patients with primary diagnosis Diabetes during the first 9 months of last year.
The aging trend of our in-patient population and Emergency patients has heightened in
recent years and brought with it related increases in acuity and Length-of-Stay. Patients
aged 60 and over accounted for 57,7% of Acute Days last year and they had an average
Resource Intensity Weighting of 1.8. The average RIW for senior' citizen in-patients
increased by 20% over the previous five years. Our Acute Admissions Per 1000 Referral
Population declined from 94.3 in 1997-98 to 86.97 in 2000-2001. The overall Average-
Length-of-Stay for Acute Care was 21 % below the database mean last year, which was 33
beds less than would have been required, had the Length-of-Stay been average. Of the
ESRD in-patients, the Acute Dialysis in-patients alone had a Length-of-Stay 44% lower
than the national database mean for Matched Cases, representing a saving of 6.8 beds,
Medical admissions increased again last year, this time by 5.4%. Surgery admissions
increased 6.5% and the Hospital's remaining 6 Surgery beds were re-opened during the
year as a result of increased Surgery volume and overflow of Medical patients on to the
Surgical Nursing Unit. Staffing and supply costs for these 6 beds need to be annualized,
OR cases increased 11% last year and we expect a further increase of 4% next year, ICU
had an increase of 3.9% in admission last year.
Our Medical in-patient units require an increase of 6,5 FTEs to cope with workload
increases and acuity, as well as the provision of case management to further improve upon
bed utilization, An addition of 13,7 FTEs are required for the Surgery Program, including
beds, OR, Recovery Room, Day Surgery and Pre-Admission Clinic. ICU has an average of
1.9 Dialysis patients (up to 4 at a time) and an additional 0.8 beds occupied by Nephrology
patients. ICU staffing requires an additional 1.97 FTEs and Respiratory Therapy requires
1.6 FTEs to expand on-site coverage to 24/7. Psychiatric in-patient admissions increased
4% last year with high acuity levels reflecting the shortage of Schedule 1 beds in our area.
An increase of 1.5 FTEs in trained Mental Health Nursing staff is required to provide night
shift coverage, A shared services agreement with New Path Youth & Family Services to
provide youth crisis intervention service in North Simcoe requires funding of 0.5 Paediatric
Social Worker, ER visits increased by 2,6% again last year. The average age of our
. Emergency patients continues to increase and we require an additional 2.78 FTEs in ER
staffing, which will enable us to provide dedicated triage staffing, which has become a
1
necessity. In addition, 1.6 CCAC Case Workers approved in mid-2000-2001 requires /, r;.
annualization. U / ,7
Out-patient strategies to decrease bed pressures, cope with waiting list demand and
enhance quality of life include the following:
1, Heart Health Function Clinic, + 1,5 FTE
2, Cardiac Rehab, + 0,6 FTE
3. Urodynamic & Incontinence Clinic + 0.2 FTE
4. Diabetes Education Clinic (Adult & Paediatric) + 0,81 FTE
5. Chiropody + 1.0 FTE
6, Arthritis Clinic + 0.4 FTE
7. Asthma Clinic + 1,0 FTE
8. , Oncology Clinic + 0,61 FTE
9. Home Dialysis + 0,2 FTE-
10. Ambulatory Care + 0.4 FTE
11. Endoscopy + 0.2 FTE
12. Eating Orders Clinic + $72,000 increase was approved last year
Support and ancillary service staffing increases are required as follows:
1. Pharmacy + 1,0 FTE for Dialysis and Oncology
2. Diagnostics: + 4.93 FTE in Diagnostic Imaging; + 2,0 FTE in Laboratory; and,
+ 0,1 FTE in Regional Genetics Program
3. . Pastoral Care + 0.6 FTE
4. Absorb $25,000 shortfall in MinistIy budget transfer download to County for
Outreach Pre-School Rehab
5. Information Services:
a) + 0.1 FTE GRASP staffing
b) + 1.2 FTE Health Records
c) + 0.5 FTE Public Relations
6, Maintenance + 3.5 FTE
7. Personnel + 0.2 FTE
8. TQM + 1.0 FTE
We hope to have an Ontario Breast Screening Program approved and funded in the coming
year. A Cancer Resource Centre in our Oncology Unit to meet the information needs of our
patients and the general public is opening in April 2001.
The influenza season this past year was comparatively lighter in impact than preceding
years, however it remains an ongoing concern for future years. This past year 65% of our
staff were vaccinated and no doubt this contributed to a 23.80/0 decrease in paid sick leave,
compared with the previous year (41.2% lower than in 1995), OHA Hospital Report Card
data shows that Soldiers' Memorial Hospital has the highest percentage of paid staffing
hours dedicated to direct patient care.
Last year the hospital's Administrative & Support Services costs were $1.6 million below
the benchmark standard targeted by the Health Services Restructuring Commission, This
has created a number of difficulties and the situation cannot be sustained since it actually
2
~. '. 5/./0
contributes to inefficiencies, Nonetheless, only a portion of these "forced savings" is
targeted for replenishment this corning year, The Hospital's actual Acute Cost Per Case
was only $2,011 last year, which represents a decrease of 10% from the previous year. We
expect our actual Acute Case Cost for 2000-2001 to be as much as 20% lower than the
Expected Case Cost and it may well be the most effective Case Cost ratio in the Province,
This would be approximately $5,7 million lower than expected. As a result of inflation and
growing workload pressures, our global budget for 2001-2002 needs to be increased by
$7,2 million.
A list of program changes implemented or planned last year are found on pages 44 to 46.
An outline of our multi-year Redevelopment Capital Project is found on page 18. The first
phase of this 6-year project will take place in 2001-2002 with the closure of a street and
site work which will result in a parking capacity increase of approximately 50% ro address
the most frequent complaint we receive from: the public,
..:-."
Lack of space is at an extreme level, although we cannot do anything to increase bed
capacity for another 5 years, other than usi:hg patient TV lounge space, we will be seeking
altemative off site space for low-tech out-patient services and storage,
3
B
6-/~-I/
Hospital Proille
Mission/Vision Statements (enclosed)
Accreditation Status: 3 Year (April 1998)
Organization Chart (enclosed)
Soldiers' Memorial Hospital is a member of Rural & Northern Hospital Network # 1 and
provides a comprehensive range of in-patient and out-patient services to meet the primary
and secondary needs of the residents of Orillia and region, These services include Medical,
Surgical, Obstetric, Paediatric, Rehabilitation, Mental Health, Critical, Oncology, Sub-
Acute, and Complex Continuing Care, In addition, the hospital provides regional s.ervices
in High Risk Obstetrics, Paediatrics and serves as the Level II Perinatal referral centre for
the region, including Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Other regional services include
Paediatric Oncology (satellite of HSC); Genetics Clinic (satellite of NYGH); Sexual
Assault/Domestic Violence; and, Paediatric Diabetes Education.
The hospital serves as the Regional Dialysis Centre for Simcoe and Muskoka, with satellite
Dialysis Units in Alliston, Collingwood, Huntsville, Barrie and Penetanguishene, The
OSMH Dialysis Centre has experienced very rapid growth, around 250/0 per annum due to
repatriation during the past few years, which necessitated a second 6-station unit in the
hospital for a total of 17 stations, excluding capacity to dialyze 2 patients at a time in ICU.
The secondary station, which serves primarily Level I patients will be reconstructed and
expanded to 8 stations in 2001, During the construction period of approximately 6
months, a temporary Dialysis Unit will be established in our largest meeting room.
There are just over 200 patients in the regional system receiving scheduled Haemodialysis
or Peritoneal Dialysis. In addition, there are approximately 90 patients monitored in our
Pre-Dialysis Clinic Service, for a total of roughly 300 ESRD patients in the regional system.
Due to volume growth pressures, which led to rationalization of services at the Regional
Centre during the past year, the satellites in Alliston, Collingwood and Penetang expanded
their caseload. Subsequently an expansion capital project at Collingwood has been
approved and the temporary unit at Penetang received approval to construct a new
permanent 8-station unit. Both of these projects are expected to take place during the
fiscal year 2001-2002. The interim unit in Barrie moved to their permanent new quarters
late in the year and quickly increased their caseload to around 36 patients.
In-patient Long Term Care Dialysis has been provided for a number of years in our
Complex Continuing Care Unit. We are continuing to explore options for participation in
nocturnal Dialysis. Home Haemodialysis will be offered on an exception basis. Our
Nephrologists and a variety of other clinical staff visit satellite units on a regular basis.
Regional clinical seminars in End Stage Renal Disease are provided for nurses and
physicians in the region, Satellite Unit nurses are trained by the Regional Centre. We also
collaborate with Georgian College in their Dialysis Technologist and Nephrology Nursing
Programs. In addition, we provide technical support to the 5 satellite clinics and manage
the clinical database, Self-care Haemodialysis for selected stable Levell patients began
during the past year and such training continues at the Orillia site to expand the use of
this modality, with priority being given to the Barrie, Orillia and Penetang centres.
4
;( I , I fA-
'-...J I ,(../
RVH and OSMH are collaborating in recruitment of a Nephrologist to be based in Barrie, as
*Well as further integration of Dialysis/Nephrology services between our two hospitals. The
accommodation of Dialysis/Nephrology in-patients has been growing at an alarming rate
and using a greater proportion of our beds during the past few years. This growth rate is
destined to consume a disproportionate percentage of the planned increase in bed numbers
included in our Redevelopment Project. Accordingly, it is appropriate to look at the option
of planning in-patient Nephrology services at Royal Victoria Hospital.
.,
J
Bed utilization @ 90% occupancy by Dialysis patients at OSMH in 2000-01 was as follows:
Dialysis Patients Nephrology Patients Dialvsis/Nephrology Patients
ICU Beds 1.89
MedjSurg Beds 6.67
Total Acute Beds 8.56
Long Term Care Beds 4,89
Total Beds 13.45
0.78
2,78
3.56
nla
3.56
2.67
9.45
12,12
4.89
17,01
Acute patient days for Dialysis patients alone are 44.10% under the CIHI database average
for Matched Cases, a saving of 6.8 Acute beds. The Acute Nephrology (Pre-Dialysis) patient
Average-Length-of-Stay was 24,1% below the mean for Matched Cases, a further saving of
1.1 Acute beds, The combined bed savings is 7.9 Acute Beds (CIHI data not available for
LTC patients). The average RIW for our Acute Dialysis in-patients is currently 2.5972. It is
imperative that Soldiers' receive infrastructure funding as the best facility for the Regional
ESRD Program to address the financial impact of this Program throughout the hospital.
The Ministry has been presented with information outlining the need for approximately $1
million to address the host hospital costs of the Regional Dialysis Program.
An 8-bed non-scheduled Psychiatric In-patient Unit located on a Medical floor also provides
out-patient follow-up counseling, The hospital also operates the Community Mental Health
Services in a house on the hospital property, which in addition to out-patient counseling
provides support services to "The Meeting Place" .(a downtown drop-in centre with funding
transfer through OSMH which provides support services for individuals with chronic
mental disabilities). The Community Mental Health Service provides same or next day
crisis intervention service, The In-patient Unit participated in Ontario's first Multi-Centre
Disorders Outcome Study in 1998 with results better than the average for the aggregate
group of ten hospitals in terms of symptomology improvement and patient satisfaction. The
clinical profile for the OriIlia Unit was very similar to the aggregate of the other hospitals,
all of which are Schedule 1 facilities, The average RIW is 1.47 for Psychiatry in-patients.
The Average-Length-of-Stay is 19% below the national database for matched cases. A
secure crisis room. for Schedule 1 patients was constructed in our Emergency Department
during the past year,
OSMH is now in its ninth year of providing a monthly outreach Child Psychiatry Clinic in
collaboration with a Psychiatrist and Social Worker from The Hospital for Sick Children
(HSC). This is an innovative educational consultation clinic using a hands-on consultee-
oriented teaching model, involving our Paediatricians who learn and upgrade their
assessment skills while interviewing and counseling patients who have been referred to
them. The Program was expanded in 1997 to include nurses and child mental health
5
<-J E -1-:.5
workers from other agencies, A paper has been written on the project by HSC with the
suggestion that the concept serve as a model to effectively deal with the shortage of child
Psychiatrists in Canada. In addition, Telehealth Psychiatrist consultations from HSC have
recently been introduced, t
While OSMH does not have dedicated Paediatric Psychiatry beds, we do routinely admit
such patients who make up our fifth largest grouping of admissions out of 25 Paediatric
Major Clinical Categories, These admissions are relatively brief (2 to 4 days). A half-time
Paediatric Social Worker position was created in 1998 in response to the growing number of
adolescent patients in crisis with overdose, depression and suicide, as well as the
Psychosocial needs of other patients with cancer and Diabetes, Due to pressing needs in all
these areas, the position was expanded to full-time last year.
Youth Crisis Intervention Services are very inadequate in Simcoe County. During the past
year we were approached by New Path Youth and Family Counseling Services of Simcoe
County to assist in improving the situation, which is comparatively quite pronounced in the
Orillia area, Subsequently we entered into a service agreement that resulted in the
recruitment of an additional full-time Paediatric Social Worker at OSMH with costs shared
equally between the respective organizations. With this additional resource, OSMH will
take responsibility for providing Level I Youth Crisis Intervention Services for our area
during the day shift, Monday to Friday, with New Path covering the Level I response during
the evening hours, as well as Level II response (21 day follow-up) for appropriate clients as
required,
OSMH is the only hospital providing a Child Abuse Service for the county in collaboration
with The Hospital for Sick Children's SCAN Team (Support Child Abuse and Neglect). In
addition, the Regional Domestic Violence Program for Simcoe-Muskoka, which started 3
years ago, is located at Soldiers' Memorial.
The Paedia t ric Program provides specialty referral service to a large catchment area
embracing Simcoe County; the Districts of Muskoka and Parry Sound; northern Durham;
and part of Victoria and Haliburton Counties. The four Paediatricians, who provide only
consultation referral service, conduct visiting clinics at a number of other hospitals in the
region. The Level II Neonatal Program encompasses a hospital referral network that has up
to 2,500 de!lveries a year. In 1999-2000 only 1.8% of neonatal transfers from our main
referral hospitals (Bracebridge, Midland, Collingwood, Huntsville, Parry Sound) were
transferred to a Level II Centre other than OriIlia. The Paediatric Program routinely
manages complex medical cases.
Multi-disCIplinary outreach Rehabilitation Services are provided for pre-school children in
their homes throughout the County. Since 1982 the hospital has provided multi-
disciplinary staffing for the Child Development Assessment Team sponsored by MCSS
funding. The MCSS funding support for the remaining CDAT staffing has been transferred
directly to Soldiers' as a result of a Request for Proposal competition in April 2000, to
consolidate delivery of such community clinics for the region. In addition to Orthotic clinics
at different sites in the area, the Paediatric Program provides a Level II Seating Clinic for
Children.
OSMH is the only Level II Neonatal and Paediatric Program in Ontario, which compiles
regional clinical data and publishes a statistical analysis of activity and outcomes, which is
shared with the participating hospitals, The Hospital for Sick Children and other Level III
6
-.5~/. / /" /
{ -" f..../
. .'
Centres, Regional clinical seminars with OSMH and visiting speakers are hosted twice a
year for doctors and staff from other hospitals in the region.
OSMH does provide Paediatric Advanced Life Support and Neonatal Resuscitation training
for physicians and staff for all hospitals in Network # 1 as well as Parry Sound. Last year a
Medical Resident in Paediatrics spent her summer rotation in Oriilia and subsequently
committed to joining our Medical Staff, A Paediatric Clinical Nurse Specialist was also
recruited in 2000.
i
J
Paediatric Oncology Services, including both in-patient and out-patient cases, were
upgraded to become one of only four regional satellite clinics of The Hospital for Sick
Children in 1996, with Telehealth linkage to reduce travel for patients and their families,
Funding support through the Paediatric Oncology Group of Ontario (POGO) was approved
in 1998, The Telehealth equipment is also used for education and other forms of clinical
consultation,
A Regional Paediatric Diabetes Education Clinic, co-sponsored by Lions' Clubs from
northern Simcoe and Muskoka was established in 1997 in collaboration with The Hospital
for Sick Children and has since been expanded to meet demand from all areas of Simcoe-
Muskoka-Parry Sound. The Diabetic Clinic is one of only 6 clinics in Central East with a
full spectrum of dedicated staff and has the largest workload in Central Ontario, north of
Toronto,
OSMH is the only centre outside of Toronto participating in development of the electronic
Child Health Network (eCHN) with The Hospital for Sick Children, IBM, Toronto St.
Joseph's Health Centre, Centenary Health Centre and St. Elizabeth.
Surgery services include Ophthalmology, Orthopaedics, ENT, Urology, Plastic Surgery,
Gynaecology, General Surgery and Oral Surgery. There are 18 Surgeons, some of who
provide out-patient and Day Care Surgery services at other hospitals in the region, A
Vascular Surgeon from Barrie provides vascular access for Dialysis patients in our OR,
There arc also 5 Anaesthetists and 2 RNFAs (Registered Nurse First Assistants). A 12-bed
Short Stay Unit is included in the in-patient program. Eighty percent (80%) of elective
surgery ca ses are performed on an out-patient basis, Nearly 90% of elective in-patients are
operated un the day of admission, Urology laser equipment was installed this past year,
There arc approximately 9,250 surgical procedures performed annually. OSMH has used
Ophthalmology lasers since the 1980s and last year became the fIrst hospital in Network #
1 to use Urology lasers,
OSMH uses InterQual and has a physician reviewer for Length-of-Stay and early discharge
facilitation. For 3 years a consultant specializing in utilization analysis was contracted on a
half-time basis, but this was discontinued a year ago when the data demonstrated potential
bed use savings that were too small and scattered to be completely eradicated.
According to the 1996 ICES Practice Atlas, the benchmark Length-of-Stay for our mix of
Medical patients is high (top quartile for the 61 medium to large sized non-teaching
hospitals) indicating an above average severity rating. In that report, OSMH placed among
the top 10 facilities in terms of ALOS performance. In 1996 our overall Acute Length-of-
Stay was 15% below the national database average for Matched Cases. It has since
improved to 21 % below the mean and our RIW has increased 20%. We have al1140 Acute
Beds in operation and would have required 33 additional beds at 90% occupancy if our
Length-of-Stay had been average last year,
7
6/-/2>'
Alternate Level Care days, which were approximately 20% in the early 1990s, ranged from
1.30/0 to 2,8% of all Acute patient day in 1998/99, but this increased to as high as 5.90/0
during the 3rd Quarter of 1999-2000, It subsequently dropped to 4.3% during the first 9
months of 2000-2001, but has dramatically increased during 4th Quarter to levels well into
the teens during February /March and has continued until April 2001, The hospital's
average RIW for Acute care has also been rising in recent years reaching 1.3 in 1999-2000
and we are expecting the year-end average for 2000-2001 to remain above 1.2.
U sing the last PDST Referral Population projections and holding the Adjustment Factor and
ESI ratio constant, our population utilization ratios are as follows:
Acute Days/ 1000 Pop,
Separations/ 1000 Pop.
1997 -98
410.9
94.3
1998-99
414,3
89.3
1999-00
406.47
89.15.
2000-01
413.SZl-
86,97
Our patients are aging and the impact over the past five years has been quite dramatic:
1999-00
1995-96
Increase
% Acute Cases
41.8
35,5
6.3
+ 17.7%
Patients 60+ years
% Acute Days % RIW
57.7 59.4
51.9 49.8
5.8 9.6
+11.2% +19.3%
A vg, RIW I Case
1.7946
1.4760
0,3186
+21.6%
CIHI research has demonstrated that aging has a statistically significant impact on hospital
resources at age 70 and older, The aging effect has been quite significant in the case of
Soldiers' Memorial:
1999-00
1995-96
Increase
% Acute Cases
30.4
24.5
5.9
+ 24,1%
Patients 70+ years
% Acute Days % RIW
43.5 44.7
38.6 36,1
4.9 8.6
+12.8% + 23.8%
Avg. RIW I Case
1.8597
1.5450
0.3147
+ 20.40/0
An average of 16,6 beds were occupied by patients with Primary or Most Responsible
Diagnosis Diabetes during the first 9 months of 2000-01.
We have been tracking "Return Admissions for Related Diagnosis Within 1 Week" since
1988. Before we eyer closed any beds it hovered around 4.2 to 4.4%. This level has been
maintained or even reduced to as low as 3.5% since we began closing beds in 1992, We
were concerned that it rose to 5.2% during the 3rd Quarter of the 1999-2000 fiscal year
when bed pressure was severe, Since then, we have opened all available beds on a
permanent basis and the incidence of return admissions for a related diagnosis has
returned to a level of 4.0 to 4,1. Over the same time interval, our Average-Length-of-Stay
has increased from 30% below the national database average for Matched Cases to the
safer level of 21 % below.
Despite our tremendous gains in utilization effectiveness, we are concerned about our
ability to cope with bed pressures while waiting for expansion and redevelopment. Our
8
.t..' . -(G,.
~ / .
patients are aging, the RIW is rising and our ALC experience has become fragile. Oriilia is
in a very precarious position in terms of nursing home beds, In relative terms it is the most
'under-resourced area in the County, Over a year ago a local nursing home closed and
while a new nursing home will soon open in Orillia, it will be followed soon thereafter by
closure of yet another nursing home, which is bankrupt. Of greater concem is that
although a license for an additional 100 nursing home beds in OriIlia would be easily
attainable, there was only a 31-bed bid in a recent Request for Proposals.
Our "Chronic Care" Unit was restructured during the early 1990s and by the time the
Ministry's Chronic Care Unit Role Statement was announced it had already been fully
implemented at OSMH, The Unit now provides Complex Continuing Care (CCC),
Transitional and Sub-Acute Care, in-patient Haemodialysis and Emergency Respite. This is
a high turnover unit with an Average-Length-of-Stay of approximately 40 days. The
Average-Length-of-Stay for 28% of discharges from this unit is less than 14 days. Only
13.2% of CCC discharges over the past five years were transferred to nursing homes, a
range of 35 to 50 annual discharges. In the year prior to restructuring this unit, (1990-91)
the total discharges to any destination, including death, was 65 and the Average-Length-of-
Stay was 293 days. Since 1994-95, as many as 402 patients in a year have been
discharged from this unit.
We have a formal partnership with Baycrest Geriatric Centre with a visiting Geriatrician
and Geriatric Psychiatrist, each visiting twice a month, A Clinical Nurse Specialist in
Geriatrics was hired last year. Together we collaborate with Long Term Care facilities in the
community to provide assessments, education and a planning forum. Assessments take
place in Nursing Homes, Residential Care Facilities and patients' homes, as well as in the
hospital, In fact, the majority of them are not hospital patients. Telehealth consultations
in Geriatric Psychiatry from Baycrest have also been introduced,
The R~ha bilitation Program is quite comprehensive with Physiotherapy; Occupational
Therapy: Speech Therapy; Audiology; Kinesiology; Recreation Therapy; Nutrition, Social
Work and Chiropody. Services include: Cardiac-Rehab Program, Chronic Obstructive Lung
Disease Program; Heart Function Clinic; Neurological Program; Orthopaedic Clinic;
Paediatric and Adult Orthotics; Hand Injury Service; Arthritis Clinic; Amputee Clinic;
Carpal Tunnel Clinic; Eating Disorders Program; Paediatric Feeding/Swallowing Clinic;
UrodynCi mics & Incontinence Clinic; Stress Management Program; Food Clinic; Level II and
Level III Seating Clinics; Regional Pre-School Rehab Outreach Program; Regional Child
Community Clinics (Child Development Assessment); Regional Domestic Violence Program;
Neonata 1 Hearing Screening Program; Sedated Evoked Response Audiology; Auditory Brain
Stem Response Testing; Electronystagmography; Electrochocleography. Oto Accoustic
Emissions testing was introduced in 1998, In addition to an Adult Diabetes Education
Clinic (DEe) there is a regional Paediatric DEC serving all Simcoe/Muskoka/Parry Sound.
A Physiatrist joined our medical staff in 1998,
In-patient rehabilitation beds were dedicated and consolidated in 2000 to provide a
comprehensive program to Rehabilitation patients. A Rehabilitation Program Team was
formed to address the needs of this clientele and to plan for the IS-bed in-patient service in
the Redevelopment and Expansion Project. A Physiatrist provides the clinical leadership for
the Program. The hospital requests that the Ministry formally designate the Program as
Rehab at this time as a pre-cursor to the 15-bed program when the expansion project is
completed,
9
\...../; , ,-
In addition to in-patient services, Rehab support staffing is provided for the Regional
Dialysis Program, Adult and Paediatric Diabetes Education Clinics and Mental Health
Service. Teaching agreements for student placements in Physio, O.T., Speech Therapy and
Audiology include: Queen's University; University of Western Ontario; University of
Toronto; Ithaca College of New York; and, Humber College (Physio Assistants only).
Other notable programs j services at the hospital include:
Q The Regional Sexual Assault Centre, with 24-hour service, is located at OSMH.
Q The hospital also operates a 3-bed Sleep Disorders Lab with 9 patients a week.
"Fluorescein Angiography is provided for the region in combination with the
Ophthalmology Laser Service.
The Out-patient Adult Oncology Clinic provides chemotherapy for northern Simcoe
and Muskoka, This unit was expanded in 1999-2000 with government financial
assistance to overcome crowding caused by increasing numbers of patients.
The Paediatric Oncology satellite of Tne Hospital for Sick Children services in-
patients and out-patients referred frgrD. throughout Central Ontario.
Other out-patient services include: . <Blood Transfusion Clinic; Video Endoscopy;
Home Care Neonatal Phototherapy; Breast Feeding Clinic; and, Ambulatory Blood
Pressure Monitoring,
The hospital also operates a Young Parents' Resource Centre off site,
"
Q
Q
c
A new state-of-the-art Laboratory computer system was recently installed as part of the
electronic Child Health Network project. Fibre-optic cable was also installed throughout
the building in preparation for Order Entry jResults Reporting, We are participating in
Simcoe County's Lab Reform Initiative.
The Ministry of Health has confirmed that our Hospital Administrative and Support
Expenses were only 11.58% of total net costs in 1998-99, compared with the HSRC
benchmark of 13.75%. In dollar terms, thes'e overhead costs were $905,359 or 15.80/0
under the HSRC target. For 2000-01 the results are even more dramatic: 10,5% or
$1,597,037 below the HSRC benchmark target.
The OHA's Hospital Report Card published last Fall, identified only two hospitals were
"Above Average" (Le,- statistically significant) in terms of highest percentage of patient care
hours out of total paid hours during 1996-97 and 1997-98. Soldiers' Memorial was the
only hospital in the Province to receive the "Above Average" rating in both years, In 1999-
00 our patient care hours represented 72.3% of total staff hours, compared with the
provincial average of 59.2%. Paid Sick Leave in 2000 was 23.8% lower than the previous
year and 41.2% lower than in 1995.
10
't
~;'.' /C/
~ f ~ t- 6
OSMH's case cost performance has been lower than expected since 1991/92:
93/94
94/95
95/96
96/97
97/98
98/99 99/00
Expected
Case Cost 2253
2356
2379
2362
2315
2438 2500*
Actual
Case Cost 2157
2009
2096
2004
2117
2203 2011
Difference
96
347
283
358
198
235
489
Below by (4.3%)
(14.7%)
(11.9%)
(15.2%)
(8,6%)
(9.6%) (19,6%)
Provincial
Rank 33rd
3rd
8th
3rd
11th
?
?
Savings 1M
3,8M
3M
3,9M
2M
204M
5.7M
* This is a proxy since the 1999-2000 Expected Case Costs have not been published as of
the date of the Operating Plan submission
In the past six years, OSMH's actual case cost has been significantly lower than its
expected case cost, If the hospital had been funded on the difference in case costs
(Expected Case Cost - Actual Case Cost) multiplied by the number of weighted cases, it
would have translated into more than $20 million of additional Ministry revenues over six
years. If the annual average was used (i.e, - $3.5 million) and the hospital's base Ministry
funding was adjusted accordingly., OSMH would have been in a surplus position in 2000-
2001.
Soldiers' Memorial Hospital is a member of the Simcoe-Muskoka Health Network # l(Royal
Victoria Hospital, Collingwood General & Marine Hospital, Penetanguishene Mental Health
Centre, Penetanguishene General Hospital, Huronia District Hospital, South Muskoka
Memorial Hospital, Algonquin Health Services Corporation), The Network will be focusing
on improved access to services and efficient use of resources, both human and physical.
The Network will work co-operatively with other health care providers, including
Community Care Access Centres. Both the Simcoe-York and Muskoka and Nipissing, Parry
Sound and Tamiskaming District Health Council Executive Directors attend Network
meetings. The Network will continue to build on co-operation that has already begun
between hospital partners in information technology, diagnostic services, human resources,
infection control, purchasing and fmancial services,
11
Re~ional & District Services Provided by
Soldiers' Memorial
0/;' ~ /9'
/
Service Area
Dialysis/Nephrology (over 250 E8RD patients) 8 M P8
Satellites in Alliston, Collingwood & Huntsville, Barrie and
Penetanguishene
. Paediatric Medicine 8 M P8 H
. Paediatric Oncology (In-Pt; Out-Pt; Day Care) 8 M P8 H
1 of 4 Hospital for 8ick Children (HSC) satellites in Province
. Regional Paediatric Diabetes Centre 8 M
(developed in collaboration with HSC)
. Paediatric Mental Health (collaborative with HSC) 8 M P8 H
. Mobile Outreach Pre-School Rehab 8
. Paediatric Clinics in Midland/Parry 80und/Huntsville 8 M P8
Child Development Assessment Team 8 M P8
(Community Clinics)
. Neonatology/NICU - Level II 8 M P8 H
Obstetrics - Level II 8 M P8 H
GYN Clinic in Collingwood 8
Fertility Clinic 8 M PS
. Regional 8exual Assault Care Centre (1 of 28 sites in Ontario) 8 M P8 H
Domestic Violence Project (1 of 7 sites in Ontario) 8 M P8
. Regional Genetics Clinic (satellite of North York General Hosp) 8 M P8 H
. Fluorescein Angiography (Ophthalmology) Y 8 M P8
. CT Scanning for Bracebridge & Huntsville M
. Electrochoc1eography & Electronystagmography 8 M P8 H
. Seating Clinics Level II 8 M P8
. Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease Program NS M
. Cardiac Rehab Program (North Simcoe & South Muskoka) NS 8M
. Sleep Disorders Lab S M PS
. Urology - Day Surgery in Midland NS SM H
. ENT - North Simcoe and Muskoka NS M
- Day Surgery in Bracebridge NS M P8 H
. Plastic Surgery - Simcoe - Muskoka S M PS H
. Adult Oncology - North Simcoe & Muskoka NS M
. Ch 1 ropody - Orillia/BracebridgejMidlandjBeaverton and NS M PS H
Pa rry Sound overload
a Nephrology Clinics - Alliston, Huntsville, Collingwood S M
Barrie and Penetanguishene
a Youth Crisis: Service NS
a Heart Function Clinic NS
S - Simcoe M -Muskoka PS - Parry Sound Y - York
NS - North Simcoe SM - South Muskoka WS - West Simcoe H - Haliburton
12
. .
/, 'I
U " - cO
Soldiers' Memorial Tertiary Centre Partners hi}!!
Hospital for Sick Children
Sunnybrook & Women's College
North York General Hospital
Baycrest Geriatric Centre
Mt. Sinai
OSMH Teaching Agreements:
University of Toronto:
St. Lawrence College:
Georgian College:
Ithaca College of New York:
Queen's University:
U of West em Ontario:
McMaster University:
Humber College:
George Brown College:
Michener Institute:
Centennial College:
Sir Sanford Fleming College:
Career Canada College (Ottawa)-
Laurentian University:
Centennial College:
Sir Sanford Fleming Coll.:
Career College (Ottawa)
Level II Neonatology
Oncology Satellite
electronic Child Health Network (eCHN)
Diabetes Education Centre
Mental Health
Telehealth
Telehealth
Genetics Satellite Clinic
visiting Geriatric and Psychiatric assessments
education
planning
Telehealth
participating in CDC (Atlanta) research project
on Strept A fasciitis
final year Family Practice Residents; Physio; Nursing
3rd Year Lab Techs; only training centre in region (only
12 centres in Ontario)
RNs; RPNs; Dialysis Techs; Early Childhood Education
Therapists
Audiologists; Speech Pathologists
Nursing, Physio, OT
Nursing, Physio, OT
Physio; OT; Family Practice Residents
Post Diploma Nursing
Post Diploma Nursing (OR)
Diagnostic Imaging Tech. Students
Rehab Assistants
Health Sciences
Rehab Assistants
Nursing
Rehab Assistants
Health Sciences
Rehab Assistants
13
Other ReJ?:ional Collaborations
S/'- dl
OR time for RVH Orthopaedic Surgeon and Vascular Surgeon (vascular access for
Dialysis patients)
.
Shared Call Coverage
ENT:
Ophthalmology:
General Surgery:
Orthopaedics:
RVH
SMMH
NSHA
RVH
· Shared Pathologist relief coverage (vacation/illness) for Parry Sound, Bracebridge and
Hun tsville
· County-wide utilization and outcomes database management for Diabetes Education
clinics in Barrie, Alliston, Collingwood and Penetanguishene
· Paediatric and Perinatal utilization and outcomes database management for
Collingwood, Midland, Bracebridge, Huntsville and Parry Sound
· Regional Education Services for Simcoe, Muskoka and Parry Sound:
- Annual Nephrology Conference
- Annual Psychiatry Conference (attendees from Toronto, Hamilton, etc, also)
- Annual Paediatrics Conference
- Annual Neonatology Conference
- Paediatric Advanced Life Support Training (also Lindsay)
- Neonatal Resuscitation Training (also Lindsay)
- Sexual Assault/Domestic Violence (also Lindsay & Peterborough)
· Participation in Regional Infection Control Collaborative (education/protocols)
· Referral of challenging Diabetes cases from other Diabetes Education Centres
· Group purchasing with Simcoe, Muskoka, Newmarket and Orangeville hospitals
· Shared Antibiotic Infusion Therapy Service with Home Care
· Obstetric services for Haliburton/Minden hospitals
c Shared services agreement with New Path Youth & Family Counseling Services to
provide Youth Crisis Intervention Services
c Simcoe County jNorth Network - Telehealth (medical consultations & CMEs)
14
'. ~'/, d ."1 'A--/
v.-o(./
Soldiers' Memorial Community (Orillia\ Collaborations
· Baycrest Orillia Services for Seniors (BOSS): OSMH sponsors visiting Geriatrician
and Psychiatrist for assessments and education for local nursing homes, homes for
the aged and community patients,
Representation on Orillia Alzheimer Society Board
Safe Community Project:: various organizations; falls prevention; safe workplace;
ER injury database,
Safe Driving Project: OPP and Simcoe Against Drunk Driving.
OSMH operates Community Mental Health Services,
Transfer Agent and staff support for "The Meeting Place" - drop-in centre for the
chronically men tally ill,
· Space, overhead and volunteer training support for Telecare (24-hour help line),
· Close collaboration with the local Canadian Diabetes Association including Board
representation,
· Integrated Palliative Care with Hospice Orillia.
· Lead Agent and employer for Community Action Program for Children (CAPC)
including operation of Young Parents' Resource Centre.
· Space rental for a private hearing aid service.
· Community Breast Cancer Support Group - space and telephone answering service,
· Women's Health Information Network - staff support and space.
· Huronia Regional Centre - diagnostic and hospital services.
· Meals-on-Wheels - food.
· A.F.T.E.R.S, - Teen suicide support group meets at hospital,
· Overeaters Anonymous and Alcoholics Anonymous - meeting space.
. Outreach Orillia - resource sharing agreement with hospital's Community Mental
Health Service.
c Georgian College - needs analysis and curriculum development
c South Street Addiction Services - transportation to Barrie Detox Unit
15
L'~"""""" ~ r".r"';!
<J/~C'.......)
Soldiers' Memorial/Private Sector Partnerships
Kodak
2 year mentorship in CQI
MediSense (Abbott)
development of a Diabetes management software
Heron Technology
GE Medical Systems
development of Radiology billing software
on-site biomedical engineering (contract extended to
Barrie, Allistoni"Collingwood, Midland, Collingwood and
Bracebridge).. !
Kolvox Communications -
Kurzweil Voice Recognition (Radiology) demonstration site
IBM
electronic Child Health Network (eCHN)
K-BRO
laundry
Barrie Connex
video educational website for consumers and professionals
Orillia Power Corp,
community fibre optic network (PRO-NET)
MDS Lab
we provide stat services for MDS
16
Soldiers' Memorial Medical Staff Complement
Medicine: General Internists
General/ Oncology
Respirologist
N ephrologists
Physiatrist
Psychiatrists
Dermatologist
Surgery: General Surgeons
Urologists
Obstetricians
Oph thalmologists
ENT
Plastic Surgeon
Orthopaedics
Vascular
Paediatrics: Paediatricians
Anaesthesia:
Anaesthetists
General Practice: GPs
Pathology:
Pathologists
Radiology:
Radiologists
Dental:
Dentists
Maxillofacial:
4
1
2 (1 vacancy)
2
1
1 (plus 3 Courtesy)
1 (plus 1 Courtesy)
4 (plus 1 Courtesy)
2 (plus 1 Courtesy)
4 (plus 1 Courtesy)
4 (plus 4 Courtesy)
2 (plus 4 Courtesy) (1 vacancy)
1
1 (plus 1 Courtesy)
(1 Courtesy)
4
5
45 (plus 12 Courtesy)
2 (1 vacancy)
5 (2 vacancies)
13
1
17
/'
~. f#';;c;
S/;d)
StrateJ!ic Priorities for Next Three to Five Years:
A major focus of attention to address a multitude of issues over the next three to five years
will be continued planning and preparation for the hospital's Redevelopment and
Expansion. This will consist of a new 7-storey wing of approximately 130,000 square feet,
plus renovations to existing facilities.
The Redevelopment Project is intended to address the following issues:
1. Expand capacity/overcome crowding (beds and clinic space)
2. Broaden scope of services
· Mental Health (Schedule 1)
· Surgery
· Rehabilitation
3, Consolidate and reorganize services
· Decrease functional inefficiencies
· Overcome space and service configuration problems
· Improve patient and public accessibility
4, Improve quality and continuum of services
5. Improve environment (safety, comfort, security)
6. Enhance physician recruitment
The new \\'i.ng will include:
1. Emergency Department
2. Surgical Suite and Recovery Room
3. Day Surgery
4. Mental Health Unit
5. Rehab and Sub-Acute Unit
6. Expanded Continuing Care
7. Pharmacy
8. Laboratory
Renovations will include:
1. Additional out-patient clinic space
2. Air conditioning in existing wing
3. Upgrade Obstetrics (LDR concept)
4. Upgrade Surgery Ward
5. Upgrade existing Long Term Care Unit
6. Expand Diagnostic Imaging
18
A~ing:
5/ ' J0
Aging of the population has received prominent discussion in terms of the future of the
healthcare system. In the OriIlia area we already have approximately 180/0 of the service
population aged 65 and older. During the last few years we have already seen dramatic
impact on the hospital's resources, as described in the Hospital Profile, The hospital has
already been implementing strategies to address the growing demand for servicing senior
citizens and more will have to be done, Major disease areas associated with aging, which
will need ongoing attention area as follows:
Cardia-vascular
Within the past year we introduced a heart health function clinic focusing on
congestive heart failure, This concept has been effective elsewhere in reducing
hospital recidivism by as much as 50%, The demand is already very strong for this
service and the need identified to expand and diversify has already emerged. We
have had cardiac rehab for a number of years and we hope to expand this as part of
the network led by Southlake Regional Health Centre, Hospital staff participate in a
community-based heart and stroke education and support program. Consideration
is being given to the developing network approach in our region to implement
improved early stroke intervention service with Soldiers' taking on a District Resource
role. We are considering integration of such cardio-vascular related services for
greater overall effectiveness in terms of delivery, support services, database
monitoring, needs analysis, resource sharing, planning and inter-agency networking.
Eye Sight
We have good basics in place in this field, In addition to laser technology we have the
only Fluorescein Angiography Service in the region, Recent recruitment has brought
our medical manpower back to four Ophthalmologists, Process improvements have
resulted in a productivity output increase in cataract surgery by some 80% or more
resulting in a decrease in waiting time without increasing available OR time. An
increase in the number of Ophthalmologists will likely be required as time goes on.
Urological Disorders
There is a good technological base for this field, Laser technology was introduced a
year ago and since then a Urodynamics & Incontinence Clinic has been established,
Radical prostatectomies have been available in our hospital for a decade and we will
keep an eye open to adoption of new developments emerging in this field. Our two
Urologists are adequate for the current workload. As time goes on a third may be
required.
Kidney Disease
Considerable strength has been developed in this field since the hospital is a Regional
Centre with five satellites. The most pressing issues are capacity increase needs,
both in the Regional Centre and in satellites. Visiting clinics have been established.
We would like to get involved in post-transplant support. The in-patient bed
pressures from Dialysis and Nephrology patients in our hospital are increasing at a
rate, which outstrips overall bed increases planned for our overall, hospital
expansion project. Accordingly, we will explore options for inclusion of in-patient
services at the Royal Victoria Hospital site, as well as integrated Nephrologist service
in Barrie. In-patient, long-term care for Dialysis patients at our site is increasing
19
\.J ' ~C/-r
steadily and we already have as many as eight in-patients in our Complex Continuing
Care Unit. A 4-station Dialysis Unit and 10 Dialysis Beds have been programmed
into the expansion plans for CCC and accordingly this will develop further as regional
specialty service, Nocturnal Dialysis and Home Haemodialysis are other areas in
which we would like to move,
Osteoporosis
This area, as well as fracture and joint repair, is a field in which we will need to
expand service significantly. But, we are currently restrained by bed and OR
capacity, Increasing Orthopaedic staffing will not be possible until our facility
expansion and redevelopment project is completed,
Dementia
We have made great strides over the past couple of years in our partnership with
Baycrest Geriatric Centre with a visiting Gerontologist and Geriatric Psychiatrist, as
well as Telehealth. We have also recruited a Clinical Nurse Specialist in Geriatrics,
We have made considerable progress in Geriatric assessments in our community for
patients in nursing homes, residential care facilities, home and our own hospital and
we are now relatively on top of demand, We are also starting to receive referral
requests from outside of our primary service base. At this stage we are initiating
planning discussions with Baycrest for our next stage of evolution and it is a bit early
to forecast our new priorities, Options likely to be explored include: development of
non-medical human resource knowledge and skills; day care; community-based
therapeutic support and caregiver training; possible market expansion of assessment
services; and, recruitment of a locally based Geriatrician. Collaborative community
planning has already been established.
Other chronic disorders associated with aging, but more wide spread in terms of age cohort
presentation are:
Diabetes
The service base we have established in Diabetic education is already well ahead of
all other facilities in the region, including service for both Adults and Paediatrics.
Integration with Nephrology and Dialysis services has been initiated during the past
year. Three of our employees have privately developed a Diabetes website
(www.sugarbytes.com). which is the number one Diabetes web site accessed world
wide through Yahoo, Our staff has also been working with MediSense in the
development of new Diabetic Management software. We are now turning our
attention to improved case management of Diabetic in-patients to hopefully improve
complications management, which appears to be a significant opportunity to
contribute to .the hospital utilization management field. Ongoing expansion of
resources in Diabetes Education for out-patients will continue as apriority.
Cancer
We currently provide diagnostic Mammography and plan to introduce breast
screening within the coming year. Sentinel Node Biopsy Service for Breast Cancer
and Melanoma will be introduced within the next two or three months. An Education
Resource Centre will be opened in our Oncology Unit in April this year. Strategic
planning for the ongoing development of our Oncology services is scheduled to take
place soon. Linkage with the Royal Victoria Hospital as a future Regional Cancer
Centre will be a priority.
20
Rheumatology
To some extent recruitment of a Physiatrist a couple of years ago has been helpful in
this field and consideration is being given to recruitment of a Rheumatologist.
O/~ ,,-.,i
. }'
f ' C7
Cardio-Respiratory
We have had a Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease Clinic in operation for more than a
decade and an Asthma Clinic was more recently opened, The waiting list for our
Sleep Lab has been growing and we hope to expand this service with the addition of a
second Respirologist, In-house service hours for Respiratory Technology were
increased last year and we need to evolve to 24/7 on-site coverage.
Bed Pressures:
All available beds in the facility are now permanently open with regular backlogs in the ER
and we have periodically been forced to setup beds in a patient TV lounge, which is also
serving as a storage room, After several ye~s of declining Length-of-Stay during the 1990s,
the Length-of-Stay has now been steadily increasing as the result of significant aging of our
in-patient population and a concomitant rise in RIW. In 1999-2000 our Average-Length-of-
Stay reached 30% below the national database mean for Matched Cases and at the same
time our retum admissions for related diagnosis within one week rate climbed to an
unprecedented 5.2%, Over the past fiscal year our Length-of-Stay results moderated to 21%
below the database mean for Matched Cases and our recidivism rate declined to a more
"comfortable" rate of 4.1 %, but it is still a bit higher than the rate of 3.5% reached during
the mid to late-1990s.
Our planned bed expansion in the Redevelopment Project will not be complete until 2006,
however the expansion is based upon planning projections for 2003. The Winter season
just pa.ssed was quite tough in terms of bed pressures despite limited impact by influenza
this year. Sixty-five percent of our staff were vaccinated and the situation would have been
disastrous had we not permanently opened the last 8 medical and 6 surgical beds available
in the hospital, Obviously we are facing a huge dilemma getting through the next five years
until additional beds come on stream.
Our track record in in-patient utilization management is outstanding and has been
demonstrated in JPPC data, as well as CIHI database studies. A wide variety of utilization
management initiatives have already been well established in our facility: InterQual;
Discharge Planning; Physician UM Reviewer; Clinical Decision Unit; ER Quick Response
Case Manager; Short Stay Unit; Medical Patient Case Manager (Resource Nurse); 80% Out-
Patient Surgery; 90% Same Day Admissions; Laser Technology (Ophthalmology, Urology);
and a variety of lapar<5Scopic surgery modalities.
It is very obvious that we have very little "wiggle room" in terms of known system initiatives
to cope with expected bed pressures, which are likely to be very severe while we wait for
new beds to come on stream. A bad influenza season could be catastrophic. We conducted
a pilot project in case management on one of our medical units over the past few months
and we are impressed with the potential in terms of care, quality, process flow and service
, integration, It appears there is some potential in terms of complications management, staff
development and, better use of intemal and extemal support services. At the same time we
<< need to acknowledge that InterQual studies have shown the potential is relatively small-
21
0/-0--7
only 3 or 4 beds. Patients with a Primary or Most Responsible Diagnosis of Diabetes '
occupied an average of 16.6 beds during the first 9 months of 2000-01.
Our Complex Continuing Care Unit was restructured eight or nine years ago to include
sub-Acute and Transitional Care, Dialysis and Respite (when beds were available),
Throughput in this 34-bed unit has been increased by roughly 500% with a current
Length-of-Stay of approximately 40 days, On average only 13% of our discharges from this
unit are transferred to nursing homes,
It is obvious that we will have to achieve some unprecedented levels of UM performance if
we are to safely get through the next five years waiting for additional beds to come on
stream. In the absence of any other new ideas, we are pinning our hopes on achieving
excellence in intemal case management and complications intervention, as well as further
development of prevention services, -
The planned facility expansion will add approximately 50 beds. Thirteen of them will be
Schedule 1 Psychiatry Beds and another 13 will be in Complex Continuing Care, with 10 of
these beds being designated to a Regional Long- Terin Care Dialysis Service. This leaves a
.net gain of 24 beds in medicine, surgery and rehab. With a Length-of-Stay 21 % below the
database mean during the past fiscal year, we would have needed 33 more beds had we
functioned at the average Length-of-Stay level. Giving that some thought puts an
interesting slant on the Ministry policy to restrict capital planning to one year beyond our
targeted tender date of mid-2002, Given that these plans are flXed, the highest priority
should be given to an area outside of our hospital's control and that is the development of
more nursing home beds in OriIlia, in addition to the new facility scheduled to open this
spring. Two years ago the license for one small nursing home in town was transferred to
Barrie and we have recently learned that another local nursing home is going to close due
to bankruptcy. We understand that in a recent RFP issue there was only one proposal
received for just 31 new beds in Orillia when at least 100 were available. If no new
potential operators can be found, some innovative thinking is in order.
Human Resources:
Clinical Human Resources is an extremely high priority for strategic initiatives, In terms of
medical manpower our most significant issue is the shortage of Family Practitioners
(approximately 10 are required). We have been fairly successful in recruiting Specialists
with the most pressing current needs being 2 Radiologists, a Pathologist, an ENT Surgeon,
a Plastic Surgeon, and a Respirologist. Orthopaedics is an even greater need but will have
to wait until our expansion is completed before any progress can be made. Another
significant issue is our Hospitalist Service, which is now provided on a part-time basis by a
rotation of three Family Practitioners with no one else amongst our Medical Staff interested
in participating. Obviously consideration will have to be given toward recruitment of
dedicated full-time Hospitalists which will be much more expensive than our current
arrangement,
Within nursing we have made advances over the past year or so in the development of
advanced practice nursing positions, including two RNFAs and Clinical Nurse Specialists in
Paediatrics and Geriatrics. A vacancy exists for a CNS in Dialysis, The development of
additional positions at the level of Case Manager or CNS should be examined in terms of
Critical Care Surgery, Mental Health and more Medicine support.
22
// I /"",
\J I ~00
~We have developed a wide scope of Rehab staffing sub-specialties over the past decade,
Further growth is certainly warranted, particularly in the fields of Physiotherapy and
-Occupational Therapy in keeping with both current demand, which is under-serviced, and
our inclusion of an In-Patient Rehab Unit as part of the Redevelopment Project. We are
reasonably well staffed in most Paramedical job functions but this will need ongoing
attention, Respiratory technology is another area of note, which will require additional
staffing.
A number of nurses in areas such as Emergency are expected to retire in approximately 5
years that will coincide with the completion of our Redevelopment Project; so nursing
recruitment strategy will be vital.
Education support for staff and physicians is a definite priority area. We also want to
maintain and possibly strengthen our affiliations with Universities and Colleges lor Medical
Staff Nursing, Rehab and Paramedical professionals.
To strengthen our planning and change processes, which will be increasingly demanding,
we will need to provide additional process facilitation and co-ordination support for quality
management and our decentralized model of strategic planning.
Mental Health:
At the present time our scope in Mental Health services includes non-Scheduled In-Patient
PsychiatIy; Community Mental Health Service; Adult and Youth Crisis Intervention;
Support for the Homeless (new this coming year); Community Drop-in Centre; Paediatric
Mental Health; and, Child Abuse, Community Mental Health Services need further
resource support, Development of Schedule 1 service capability including both in-patient
and day care are a high priority i~ planning for our Redevelopment & Expansion Project.
Women's Health:
Current available services include Sexual Assault; Domestic Violence; Genetics; Eating
Disorders; and, Diagnostics such as Mammography, Bone Densitometry, etc. A Fertility
Clinic has been in place locally since the 1980s. We are planning to establish a Breast
Screening Service within the coming year. While we have had endometrial oblation
technology available for several years, we are looking at a new leading edge version. We
expect to introduce Sentinel Node Biopsy Service for Breast Cancer patients this Spring,
which will be a first in the Simcoe-Muskoka Region, A Women's Health Diagnostic Centre
will be included in our future Diagnostic Imaging Department.
Rehab:
Additional Rehab resources are a high priority in terms of Acute Out-patient Physiotherapy.
We have recently consolidated in-patient Rehab services and formed a multi-disciplinary
Rehab Patient Care Team for strategic planning, preparation for the new In-Patient Rehab
Unit, Quality Management, Utilization Management and staff development. Early formal
designation of that Rehab Unit by the Ministry would be appreciated given that the Program
is already operating as such, with consideration of Rehab patients in one area and with
comprehensive and focused Rehab programming already occurring,
.23
./"'" .
L.. / ,-..,
u /-...51
Lab Reform:
Weare collaborating with MDS and the other hospitals in Simcoe County in Lab Reform,
Our joint proposal is about to be submitted to the Ministry,
Information Technolo6:
Priorities include implementation of "Order/Entry"; full use of the electronic Child Health
Network; County-wide Lab infonnation system; and Teleradiology,
.', Space:
We are long past the point of saying space is tight, The bed situation has been previously
illustrated. Out-patient space is extremely crowded and needed service expansion faces the
barrier of "no more room". Additional Endoscopy capacity is urgently required. The Board
Room was turned over to Dialysis several years ago. Our largest meeting room will be
turned into a temporary Dialysis Unit for approximately 6 months later this year while our
secondary Dialysis Unit is redeveloped and expanded. The CEO will be giving up his office
this Spring. We are looking for options to relocate some out-patient services off site to
create some internal elbow room for needed patient care and support service expansion.
Currently our parking situation is a disgrace and is our number one complaint identified in
satisfaction surveys and unsolicited communications. This will be addressed later this year
as part of the Redevelopment Project that should result in a 500/0 capacity increase.
Key Goals for the Next Three Years:
1. Design and construction of Redevelopment & Expansion Project, including street
closure and additional parking.
2. In-patient case management excellence.
3. Transfer of some out-patient services off site to create internal space,
4. Dialysis
· expand internal Haemodialysis capacity
. expand self-care Haemodialysis where feasible within the region, as well
as the Regional Centre
. collaboration with Royal Victoria Hospital in Nephrology Services for Barrie and
explore in-patient service options
· post-transplant support
· improve out-of-town patient transportation support
5, Diabetes
D improve in-patient complications management
6. Order/Entry
24
I> 7.
Full implementation of electronic Child Health Network (eCHN)
;./ f"'\ f\
t-... . ..!l.
o I ''00
8. Breast Screening Clinic
9, Expanded Telehealth Service
10, Regional Lab Reform
11. Expand scope of Geriatrics expertise and service
12. Enhanced education and professional development support for staff and
physicians
13, Fill all medical specialist vacancies with the exception of Orthopaedics, (Which will
have to wait until completion of the Redevelopment Project) and substantial
progress in recruiting Family Practitioners
14, Maturation of decentralized strategic planning model
15. Teleradiology in collaboration with Muskoka Radiologists
Main Capital Projects for Cominll Year:
1. Close street and expand parking
2. Re-do sub-surface ice melt system on main entrance ramp
3. Redevelop secondary Dialysis Unit
Multi-Year Capital Projects:
1. Expansion and Redevelopment Project (see Strategic Priorities)
Pre-Construction Operating Plan (PCOP) to be submitted in 2002
Tender target date June 2002
Accreditation:
Last survey April 1998 - 3 years. Scheduled for next survey April 2001.
AIM self-assessment ratings are strong. We expect good survey results in population
health, continuum of care, quality process, environmental protection and results
indicator measurement (balanced scoreboard).
25
q.-", ':1 - \- .:(
!jlJ ~I,-OiL,]'U&1J
~n8 nU=R~'! ~FMORiAL
Orl\l\a SO\d\eCS' t'\effior\al HospItal
OrganIzation Chart
sof'.RO 01' Olp.EClOItS
A. E, O.
supPOrt SerJICeS
t---;;-~
Plant OpeI'a\:IOI1S
_ \MQI118dIcaI
EngIneering
R~&.
Facll\I:IeS Plann\119
E)(EaJilVE Dlp.ECCOR
._,-------_.._--_.~,..._._._._---_._--_..........--
{ IIIJ5Ine6S OflIce
rmance o;mmumcatJonS
{l'UrchBSlng
I>\aI,el!alS ~ InventO'Y ~anagemeot
5110
t\e81th~
J
C"')
\
_ DiagnostIC lmil9\ng {~ecllcloe
UIlJ'aSOUnd
labOratotY SerJlteS
lIbraN SerJlce5/l'lIbI\c.llelaIjOOS
infection Education
control
Utilization
Management
..
~
I {EmergeOCl'
_ A!1\bU atrJN SeI'I\c.eS A!1\bUlatotY CliniCS
c:.AiT'IO\l {GenetICS &.
Blrth\n9 &. NeW familY SerJ!ces/paed\aI.rlCS communitY p.ction
Program for Children
Gerlal.rlcs (COmPleX continuing care)
_ CrlI:\CiII care/Medical care
_ special MedlOlI P\'09ra!1\S { I'SYchlatN Unit
1_ Rehab Uolt
~ pa\\latllle care
oncolOQV Uolt
tl'efSOOnel
_ Human ~es payroll 8< I!~ eenefits
()CtUpatlooal Health PI. safelY
volUf\teer Sefll\ces
0111011
care Team
information Systems
cardlo PulmooaN Ilehabl\ll:iilllon
L
OIalyslS
care Team
Audlo\O!lY &. s~
cardlo-pulmonaN Rehab
Clinical NutTltlOO
ChiropodY
PhysloU\eroPY
()CtUpal1Onal il\erapY
ResplratotY il\erapY
SleeP laD
-
ernef\jenCl'
CIIre Team
sur91cal SerJlce5 \ PAC
\ .. Oay sur9er'!
...--- OR
PACU
Hafll\e 11
ophthalmol09Y CliniC
(laser/FA)
Special A!1\bulatrJN serVIceS t: ,DIabetiC EdUcation ainlc
, ill~lonal OIalyslS cwtre
, l'\iIemodlalYSIS
. .. Home o\alyslS
_ pre-DialysiS
.. 5 satellite CliniCS
..-------:
Medical
care Team
--
Mental Health
care Team
HouseKeeping { securitY
OIetaN
i__"'-'---"--
Nee PI. paedS
care Team
:-----
Obstel.rlcal
care Team
..-"
Enlllronmental
Mana~ent Team
--
sur9\cal
care Team
Septembel' 2000
pastoral care
-.---------------------------------------
Rehabilitation
care Team
PharmaCl'
communitY Mental Health Sefll\ce
tfI
11!'
ORILLIA SOLDIERS' MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
S/'~3S- ~
-...
NUMBER: II-a-25
DATE: June 1991- 0
Jan 2001 - R
QUALITY MANAGEMENT POLICY
APPROVED BY: Executive Director
CATEGORY: Quality Management Program
SUBJECT: Reporting Structure
Board of Directors
Strategic
Management
Committee
Patient Care Team
I.Medical 6, Mental Health
2. Surgical 7. Dialysis
3, Obstetrical 8. Critical
4, Paediatrics 9, Rehabilitation
5, Emergency 10. Services for Seniors
Non-Patient Care Teams
1. Board
2, Management
3. Human Resources
4. Environment
5. Information Management
Key: -. - . - . - - - . - the dotted lines denote lines of communication
the solid lines denote lines of accountability
.
c
6/'1 r7~
....,
, I-J
Community Profile
Orillia is a small city of approximately 30,000. The permanent residential population
within a 10-mile radius of the hospital is between 45,000 and 50,000, Aside from
conventional tourism there are 15,000 to 25,000 daily visitors at nearby Casino Rarna.
Approximately 18% of the Orillia and North East Simcoe population is 65 years and older.
Soldiers' Memorial Hospital's Referral Population, as calculated by the Ministry of Health,
is approximately 80,000, Only 42.5% of the hospital's patients are residents of Orillia.
Approximately 20% of our patients come from Muskoka, Parry Sound, Haliburton and
North Durham, with the balance coming from Simcoe County. Service reach exte-nds 100
kms in all directions. The hospital provides a number of regional specialty services
serving populations ranging from Northern SimcoejMuskoka to all of Simcoe and Muskoka,
The population of Simcoe County is approaching 400,000 while another 56,000 live in
Muskoka. Central and Southern Simcoe is a relatively young population with the Northern
half of Simcoe and Muskoka having age cohorts approximating those of Orillia and area.
The economy of Orillia is based primarily on service industries with a small manufacturing
sector. Orillia is located in cottage country where tourism has an effect on the hospital,
especially during Summer months when additional physician and nursing staff are
required in the ER. The Orillia area population is lower than the County and Provincial
averages in terms of income and education, However, unemployment tends to be slightly
higher than the provincial average. Our area also has a higher than average ratio of senior
citizens-living alone. A significant portion of the hospital's Referral Population comes from
rural and small town areas, including communities with small hospitals,
In 1996 there were 1,385 Aboriginal People in North East Simcoe representing 2,26% of the
total population. Fifteen people (0.02%) living in NE Simcoe speak French only, while 80
(0,13%) speak neither French nor English. Chinese is the most frequently required
language translation requirement and is available within our staff. Sign language
interpreta tion service is contracted on a demand basis,
Orillia and the three surrounding Townships have been designated under-serviced for
Family Practitioners, making primary care one of the most significant needs. The hospital
has been relatively successful in attracting medical specialists, although there are usually
a few gaps. Orillia is estimated to be short 8 to 10 Family Practitioners. Orillia has a
severe shortage of Nursing Home beds. However, collaboration between the hospital,
Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care and the community has resulted in very good access to
locally based Geria~c assessments and consultations.
The second largest casino in Canada is located nearby and draws approximately 5 million
gamblers a year, The casino is located on a First Nations Reservation with approximately
550 residents who have a notably better economy and health status than is commonly
found in Aboriginal settlements and reservations in other parts of the Province.
. More than eighty-one percent of Orillia and North East Simcoe residents who require
hospital admissions are admitted to OSMH. This is notably the highest local market
. capture rate amongst all Simcoe County hospitals.
26
S / ~ 3+
The overall Standardized Mortality Ratio in Simcoe County and Muskoka District is slightly
higher than the provincial average at 1.05 and 1,02 respectively. Ischemic Heart Disease is
the leading cause of death in both Simcoe and Muskoka.
'~~
In terms of hospital-based clinical services, the most notable gap is Orthopaedics with less
than half of the local needs being met by our facility. Our ENT service, which covers
Northern Simcoe and Muskoka, currently has a vacancy, which is covered by visiting
Surgeons, but office consultations are problematic, Other surgical services (General
Surgery, Gynaecology, Plastic, Ophthalmology, Urology) are adequate to meet local needs.
Internal Medicine Services are adequate, however there is a need for an additional
Respirologist. There is only one full-time local Psychiatrist and more are needed. The area
is very well served in terms of access to Paediatric and OB / Gyn services.
There is severe a shortage of Nursing Horne beds in Orillia, which has been recognized by
the government.
The relatively older age profile of our catchment community brings with it common diseases
. associated with aging, such as Cardio-vascular Disease, Dementia, Eye Sight Problems,
Urological Disorders, Osteoporosis, Kidney Disease and, Diabetes.
The hospital operates a Regional Dialysis Service with 5 satellite clinics serving all of
Simcoe and Muskoka. While the Program has been expanding rapidly and continuously, it
is a struggle to keep up with growing demand and rationing of Dialysis therapy has been a
frequent occurrence in recent years,
While the hospital's Diabetic Education Services are the largest and most comprehensive in
the region, it is a struggle to keep up with steadily growing referrals, with the exception of
Paediatrics, Our success and reputation is continuing to tap the potential of this
previously marginalized market.
Many of the residents of Huronia Regional Centre in Orillia stay in the community after
being discharged, resulting in a disproportionately high presence of developmentally
disabled Adults in the community. While homelessness is not as visible as in larger
metropolitan centres, it is present and steps are being taken to improve the situation with
the hospital now funded to provide support services for this population.
While gambling addiction has occurred with the development of the casino, its prevalence is
not nearly as bad as had been feared and counseling services are available.
Teenage pregnancy exists at a high rate in Orillia and the hospital is involved in providing
various forms of support for young parents and the care of their children, as well as
support for continued school education.
Local access to specialized clinical services for the Paediatrics population is exceptionally
good with Level II Neonatology, Regional Paediatrics Oncology and Diabetes support. There
is a significant need for adolescent crisis intervention service, a field that the hospital is
now entering. Locally, developmental Paediatrics is supported by exceptionally good
expertise. However, the overall demand throughout the regional market is overwhelming, .
27
X' -?r<
, ;/-,,-JU
'-/
Multi-agency support services for children provided by hospitals, School Boards and family
service organizations are very fragmented in our County with multiple funding sources and
many unfortunate service gaps as children progress from early childhood through school
years, A DHC initiative is underway to try and improve this with the hospital an active
participant.
The hospital provides a comprehensive range of rehabilitation services with many
specialized modalities and is continuing to evolve with the involvement of a local
Physiatrist, However, there is a shortage in primary care physiotherapy to address both
Acute and Chronic ailments. Eating Disorders Service was initiated in recent years and is
expanding further with recent government funding support.
The hospital collaborates with various other local organizations in the OriIlia and District
Safe Community Project. In addition to the participation of Rehab personnel from the
hospital, our Health Records Department provides database support, which has been
identifying the prevalence of preventable injuries at the hospital's Emergency Department
for evidenced-based planning and results evaluation, Follow-up initiatives have focused on
workplace injury prevention; risk and hazard awareness concerning falls; clinical and
sports and recreation injuries; road safety; and, a focus on youth issues such as drugs and
young worker injuries.
Epidemiology studies show that Domestic Violence is the most prevalent reason for women
to attend Emergency Departments for injuries, In this regard the hospital operates the
Regional Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault Centre with an emphasis on police and
health provider training, as well as public education and victim services, The hospital also
participates in community-based victim crisis support services, along with a number of
other social service agencies and volunteers, The hospital provides an Adult Crisis
Intervention Service and is about to start providing a Youth Crisis Service to deal with very
pronounced problems in our area.
For a community of this size, the availability of hospital-based specialty clinical services is
exceptionally good. At the same time, a wide variety of health and social problems, which
are not targeted by high technology, are ubiquitous. Toward this area of concern, the
hospital has been broadening its outreach for the past five or so years most often in
collaboration with other organizations,
Community and Consultation Process:
The hospital has multifaceted ongoing Consultation Processes with the community.
Consumers and caregivers from other organizations and agencies routinely participate in a
variety of advisory committees of the hospital. The hospital has representatives
participating in a number of committees of the hospital. The hospital also has
representatives participating in a number of community projects and health related
community committees and Boards, Various needs analysis surveys and customer
satisfaction surveys are conducted and our Health Records Department provides data as
requested to health-related community groups. After-hours meeting space is provided for
various health-related groups from the community. We commission independent annual
patient satisfaction surveys from both the OHA/Parkside Associates and the Conference
Board of Canada (in-patient and out-patient), Complaints and requests from patients and
28
'--"" "--" / .
communities are a valuable source of input, which have resulted in new services or revised
practices,
We have recently worked with the community, City Council and three neighbouring
townships to address the shortage of Family Practitioners and obtained under-serviced
designation for the area, Currently we are participating in community strategic planning
sponsored by the City and the Community Development Corporation.
The hospital has decentralized strategic planning under umbrella guidelines to 10 inter-
disciplinary clinical program teams, with the expectation that they involve consumers in
planning. They also include representatives from other health provider organizations as
appropriate, such as Dialysis satellites, Nursing Homes, etc. Public presentations on
various health matters and clinical services, with question and answer opportunities, are
providep by doctors and staff at different times throughout the year. -
29
D
/
1/ , r /'
~ l --yO
L./
Programs and Services Plan
Accommodating our tremendous in-patient bed pressures is one of our highest priorities.
We have previously outlined the effect of increasing admissions and Patient Days driven
primarily by aging of our in-patient population, higher acuity and Dialysis Nephrology
growth.
In the 1995/96 JPPC Hospital Utilization Study in Acute Care, Soldiers' Memorial
compared extremely well with the rest of the Province, On the day of admission only 2,5%
of our patients could have been cared for in other settings, compared with 9.3% for our
peer group and 7.7% for all hospitals, For the subsequent days of care only 7,3% of our
patients were inappropriately cared for in Acute beds, compared with 28% for our peer
group and 30.3% for all hospitals, Back then; our Average-Length-of-Stay was
approximately 15% lower than the mean for ,Matched Cases in the national database.
Since then, our utilization management has improved to 21 % below the database mean,
Subsequent InterQual assessments have shown improvement on our performance,
The Ontario Hospital Association Report Card shows that we have the best track record in
the Province in terms of the highest percentage of our staff hours dedicated to direct patient
care. We have previously demonstrated that the portion of our total net costs dedicated to
hospital administrative and support expenses were $1.6 million below the HSRC
benchmark target last year. Our actual Case Cost for 1999-2000 was $2,011, which may
well be the lowest in the Province and we anticipate being nearly $500 or 20% lower than
the Expected Case Cost.
Without question, our performance recorded in clinical and non-clinical efficiencies are
exceptional, Given that, it would be unrealistic to expect our hospital to cope with the
extreme patient workload increases associated with aging of our in-patient population,
Dialysis/ Nephrology in-patient pressures, etc, without additional funding support. Our
total surgical procedures caseload increased by approximately 9% during the past year (OR
cases increased 11,2%) and we have already achieved the projected volume levels for 2003
in our Redevelopment Project Functional Program. In addition, our Acute Days and
Separations per 1000 Referral Population are very low,
OHA Hospital Report 2001 reveals that, in 1998-99,83.62% of total In-patient Nursing
hours were Direct Nursing Care hours, compared with the provincial average of 77.01 %.
Overall, 72,3% of total hospital staff hours were Direct Patient Care compared with the
provincial average of 59.2%. Sick Leave in 2000 was 23,8% lower than 1999 and 41.2%
lower than 1995.
As planned, we reopened the last 8 of our medical beds last year. As it turned out, we also
had to reopen the last 6 of our available surgical beds toward the end of the year and costs
for this have to be annualized. Approximately one-half of our staffing increases for the
coming year are Nursing Department personnel. More staffing is required to deal with
increasing workload and acuity, Medical, surgical and ICU admissions increased 5.4%,
6.5% and 3.9% respectively. Additional Float Nurse staffing is required since we had great
~ difficulty finding additional Nursing staff on short-term notice to accommodate patient
30
1.....-/ 7 Y
admission peaks, Additional Nursing staff are required in the OR, Recovery Room, Day
Surgery, PAC and Clinics (Endoscopy, Urodynamics and Ambulatory). These are effective
means to minimize admissions. In addition to our Acute in-patient pressures, we have
increased census in our Complex Continuing Care Unit with additional acuity relating to
aging increased workload for Dialysis patients. We have up to 8 Dialysis patients at a time
in the CCC Unit and many more in the Acute care beds. Additional Nursing staff and a ,5
Recreation Therapist are required for the CCC Unit,
We are also introducing or expanding initiatives to prevent hospital admissions. These
include an expansion of our new Heart Health Clinic based on a model that is expected to
reduce cardiac readmissions by as much as 500/0, The Asthma Clinic also requires
expansion. Cardiac Rehab needs to be expanded and we hope that there might be
additional funds made available through the Southlake based Regional Cardiac Network.
Funding for 1.6 Case Managers in the ER for a Quick Response Service was appfoved
during the past fiscal year and these costs have to be annualized. Early results show that
this should be helpful for reduced admissions and improved quality of care. Similarly, we
have introduced Case Management with a Patient Care Resource Nurse Pilot Project, which
showed sufficient positive results that we are making it a permanent position and
considering expanding the concept in other parts of the hospital, Measures such as these
are absolutely essential to cope with the workload growth pressures within an over-taxed
physical plant and bed capacity environment, which cannot expand for another five years.
Our physicians have been frustrated by the limited availability of out-patient Physiotherapy
to the point that many have stopped referring patients to the hospital, leaving them with
the option of going without or paying for private services. It is essential that staffing be
increased here as well as hours of coverage for in-patient Physiotherapy to include week-
ends, which should have a positive impact on recovery and Length-of-Stay.
We have been assigned regional responsibility to provide Speech Therapy Services for
developmentally challenged Adults in the County, however we have not been able to fill the
budgeted part-time position and we feel that we have no other option but to make it a full-
time position, which should improve our ability to recruit. This will also enable us to catch
up with growing demand for stroke patients.
We have been approached by New Path Youth & Family Services to help with crisis services
in our area where the problems are relatively higher than other parts of the County,
including the highest teenage pregnancy rate, The resulting shared services agreement
provides for each party to fund half of a full-time Paediatric Social Worker position based at
Soldiers'.
We would very much like to participate in the recently proposed Arthritis initiative and
become an Arthritis Hub, This requires 1,8 FTEs however we can only free up 0.8 through
repriorized assignments and will require new funding for the balance. Without this
assistance, access to care will be sub-standard to other parts of the County where hospitals
are in a better position to afford participation because of the relatively better funding
increase they received during the past year for their budget bases.
During the past year our Mammography Service received Canadian Association of
Radiology Accreditation and we are carrying forward with our previous plan to establish a
funded Breast Screening Service.
31
5/ . </;J--
We recently received funding approval to expand our Eating Disorders Clinic as part of the
Simcoe-York Network, lead by Southlake. This will be fully implemented.
Our Asthma Clinic, which opened last year, needs to be increased by 0.5 FTE to cope with
demand,
During the 1990s OSMH provided notable leadership in out-patient Diabetes education
with related bed use reductions of up to 50% or more. As a result of a sharp increase in
aging of our in-patient population and Dialysis/Nephrology pressures as the Regional
Centre, we have lost ground in this area. An average of 16,6 beds were occupied by
patients with Diabetes as Primary or Most Responsible Diagnosis during the first 9 months
of 2000-01. Our Adult Out-patient Diabetes waiting list is by far the longest in the County
and at times it is equal to more than the aggregate waiting lists at all of the other Simcoe
County DECs. Our hospital also provides leadership in facilitating a regional approach to
Diabetes in Simcoe, including database management for DEC standards and outcomes, as
well as in-patient utilization for all hospitals. We also developed a Regional Paediatric
Diabetes Services with planning and education assistance from The Hospital for Sick
Children, which is supported in part by service club donations. The Program receives
referrals from all parts of Simcoe- Muskoka and Parry Sound and has had to expand to
meet demand. Both Adult and Paediatric Programs require additional staff augmentation
without which the consequence will undoubtedly be even more bed pressures.
Soldiers' Memorial had a full-time Chaplain position since the 1980s, which was reduced to
half-time during the funding cutbacks in the mid-1990s, Over the past year or so we have
had strong and persistent lobbying from the community, as well as from our staff to make
this a full-time position. The CCHSA surveyors in our April 2001 Accreditation Survey also
recommended that serious consideration be given to making this a full-time position. The
position has been vacant for the past two months since our Chaplain left for a full-time
position available at a smaller hospital. As a result, we have committed to recruit his
replacement to a full-time position.
Consistent with Ministry wishes, our cutbacks during the 1990s were particularly heavy in
non-clinical areas and we have already illustrated data confirmation that in relative terms
we did so more than all, or certainly most, hospitals in the Province. This has its
consequences, one of them being inadequate maintenance. Our staff, particularly in
clinical areas such as nursing etc., is totally frustrated by our inadequate maintenance
support to repair equipment, fixtures and devices. The backlog of work orders in
maintenance is well over 1800 requisitions. This can be no longer tolerated and staffing
including standby and callback will be increased by 3.5FTEs.
Health Records is another area, which has suffered through staffing cuts during the 90s.
Transcription and coding backlogs have been quite a problem and are worsening with a
combination of increased workload related to additional admissions, surgery cases and ER
volume, as well as the NACRS requirement. On top of this, increasing demand from our
Patient Care Teams for studies and data reports to facilitate clinical planning, as well as
from outside agencies and govemment, results in a lot of frustration, Staffmg for the
Department will be increased by 1.2 FTEs,
Public accountability and provision of information is a high priority that requires more
time. Our large scale expansion and redevelopment project is requiring additional efforts in
. terms of PR at a time when our executives have to devote an increasing portion of their time
32
J I ~ 'A....)
to planning and fundraising. Accordingly, our half-time Public Relations position is being
increased to full-time.
Soldiers' Memorial Hospital embraced total quality management in a significant way back
in 1981 with two years of intense mentoring by Kodak Canada and Eastman Kodak. In
addition, we created a full-time Quality Facilitator position. This was a key foundation to
our exceptional track record for quality process improvement and enviable productivity and
efficiency performance levels, which resulted in the hospital being awarded the Canada
Award for Excellence in Health Care trophy in 1997. Through tumover the position has
been vacant and the funding reallocated for the past three years, Since then, we have had
a significant tumover in leadership positions and our pace of change continues to
accelerate, There is a very strong need to re-establish this position to help us refme
processes to cope with workload pressures, particularly in clinical areas and we also want
to firmly establish quality in planning new and expanded processes related to our
Redevelopment & Expansion Project. Without question the availability of this role was paid
for many times over through efficiency gains during the early and mid-1990s. A full-time
position is being reintroduced this year. This is an unequivocal key priority.
The time has come to increase Respiratory Therapy coverage to 24/7 in-house. This will be
done with an increase of 1.6FTEs.
The waiting list for Chiropody Service has been increasing and the budget will be increased
by ,5 Chiropodists and .5 Chiropody Assistant.
Diagnostic Imaging workload and related offset funding increased 10% beyond what was
budgeted during the past year and report tumaround time has deteriorated. Accordingly,
the staffing budget will be increased by 2.23 Technology positions; 3.31 Clerical positions;
and 0,7 Student. It is anticipated that the associated cost increase will be offset by revenue
grons.
For more than a decade Soldiers' Memorial has provided a Regional Outreach Rehab
Service for Pre-School Children throughout Simcoe County. Over a year ago funding for
this service was downloaded from the Province to Simcoe County, however at the time the
Province withheld $25,000 in one-time funding which had been repeated over a number of
years but never folded into the budget base. As the sole provider for this service and with
the expecta tion from all parties that service access could not be reduced, our hospital has
absorbed this annual shortfall since it has not been picked up in County funding transfers,
We will continue to maintain the same level of service for the coming year,
Protected Programs:
Laboratory:
For the past several months our hospital has been working with MDS and the other Simcoe
County Hospitals in developing a Regional Lab Reform Proposal that will be submitted to
the Ministry in April 2001. Due to increased workload volume, staffmg in our Laboratory
will be increased by ,8 Technologist; ,9 Lab Assistant; and, .3 Secretary. None of these
staffing adjustments will compromise potential changes arising from the Regional Lab
Reform Initiative.
33
Rehabilitation Beds:
/.~ .
:5 /,cjs/
A designated In-patient Rehabilitation Unit is included in our Redevelopment Project. In
the meantime we have consolidated in-patient Rehab services and formed an inter-
disciplinary Patient Care Program Team to co-ordinate care, develop protocols, plan and
enhance teamwork to ensure readiness for the new Rehab Unit,
Hospital Networks:
Soldiers' Memorial Hospital is one of eight hospitals comprising the Simcoe-Muskoka
Hospital Network # 1, A supplementary form mutually prepared by the Network members
on plans and progress regarding implementation of the Network development is attached,
French Language Services:
The hospital is not designated under the French Language Services Act. The 1996 census
showed that in our Planning Area there were only 15 individuals who spoke French only.
However, the hospital makes an effort to ensure French language service availability in
regional services. Whenever bilingual direct care staff in such services is not available, we
have a lengthy backup list of physician and staff translators, The issue is more significant
in Dialysis Services and bilingual staff is included in the Penetang Satellite Unit, which is in
an area with a significant number of Francophones. The Ministry responsible for Culture
and Citizenship has cultural interpreters available (by phone or in person) who are trained
in the issues of violence against women and men to assist our Domestic Violence Team
(30+ languages), Sexual Assault kit forms are multilingual,
Pre-School Speech & Language Services:
This service is provided in our facility by the Royal Victoria Hospital.
Healthy Babies/Healthy Children Program:
We are in full compliance with the requirements of this Program. There is a very high
consent rate.
Out-Patient Diabetes Services:
We have both Adult and Paediatric Out-patient Diabetes Services. The latter serves as the
Regional Program for the Simcoe-Muskoka-Parry Sound Region, All DEC Nurses and
Dietitians are Certified Diabetes Educators. Both Programs have Clerical support. There is
a multi-disciplinary Adult Team, including a Family Practitioner and an Internal Medicine
Specialist. The latter provides specialized clinics for referred complicated cases. The
Paediatric Program includes a Paediatric Social Worker and a Paediatrician. Augmented
staffmg support is provided by Pharmacy and Chiropody in conjunction with Health
Records. Our Adult Program provides database management for DEC service standards
and outcomes, as well as in-patient utilization database management for all DECs in
Simcoe County. Complicated cases are referred from all of the other Simcoe communities
with hospital-based DECs. Both Programs are supported in part by donations from service
, clubs, ancillary sales revenue, and hospital lottery ticket revenue.
.
34
~ ~ I" \::::;
The Adult Program is not eligible for dedicated Diabetes funding from the Province, since it
tumed down funding in the initial offering 5 years ago because of a disagreement with the
previous Health Council's population market allocation methodology for distributing funds
to DECs in the County. We are pleased that the Province is reserving top-up funds to bring-
proposed Paediatric DECs up to planned staffing standards. However, we are disappointed
that while we were only short by .2 Paediatric Social Worker in the Paediatric Diabetes
Services Review published a year ago (and this gap has since been filled) there was no
consideration given for the fact that this Program was established in part on the basis of
donations from a number of Lions' Clubs in Simcoe-Muskoka-Parry Sound until such time
as funding is received from the Province, or a maximum of five years, whichever comes
sooner. Since the Ministry's Operating Plan Requirements "will not support a decreased to
out-patient Diabetes Education Program service volumes" the hospital will have to absorb
this unfortunate funding inequity from its global operating base, while other hospitals
which gave this much needed service lower priority in terms of resource allocation will
receive significantly more funding assistance from the Province to get up to standard. We
would never think of reducing service access in either program regardless of the level of
provincial assistance and both budgets will be increased again this year due to increased
workload pressures.
In addition to the standard DEC services we have integrated Diabetes Education with our
Nephrology clinics during the past year, which has been very successful and well received.
We are now planning to integrate with complications case management for Diabetic in-
patients with special attention to Dialysis patients, This may develop into a form of applied
research since it is an area that has been neglected in the literature, While such
progressive measures, which we have already taken and are continuing to advance, have
not been financially supported by the Ministry in our case, we will carry on for two reasons.
One - we have the expertise base and someone has to do it for the benefit of Diabetics and,
two - it is an absolute necessity in our case as a measure to ameliorate bed pressures,
During the first 9 months of 2000-01 an average of 16.6 Acute beds were occupied by
patients with Diabetes as a Most Responsible or. Primary Diagnosis.
Mental Health Services:
We will continue to provide our range of Mental Health Services without any service
reduction (Community Mental Health Service, Community Drop-in Centre, Adult & Youth
Crisis Intervention Services, In-patient Paediatric Mental Health, Child Psychiatrist
Consultations, Support Services for the Homeless and Non-Scheduled In-patient Acute
Psychiatry) .
The lack of access to Schedule 1 Mental Health Beds in Simcoe-Muskoka has blossomed
into an extreme level of frustration, which receives continual discussion at all levels
throughout the region, With encouragement and support from the other Network hospitals,
Soldiers' Memorial Hospital has offered to explore the feasibility of operating an interim
Schedule 1 Unit in available space at the Penetang Mental Health Centre as a lead-in to our
new role as a Schedule 1 Facility when our Redevelopment & Expansion Project is
completed, It is recognized that such a proposal is both extremely unusual and laden with
a myriad of complicated issues. However, this is such an issue in this region that we feel it
should at least be given some consideration. As an altemative we would be also open to
establishing such an interim unit in space we understand may become available at the
Huronia Regional Centre in Grillia. At this time we are waiting for an initial response from
the Central East Regional Team.
35
,
.
5/ ~c./G,
'Last year a Secure Holding Room was constructed in our Emergency Department because
of the prevalence of Form 1 patients. Our in-patient funding base, which began with a
. gran t in 1991, provided for Psychiatric staffing only for 16 hours a day. The night shift is
covered by a skeleton Medical Nursing shift looking after a total of 34 patients, including
the 8 Psychiatric beds. The time has come when we need to establish appropriately trained
Mental Health staff for the night shift and we plan on doing so this year with the addition of
1.53 RN.
Provincial Priority Programs:
End Stage Renal Disease:
Soldiers' Memorial Hospital is a Regional Dialysis Centre with five satellites. We_are
collaborating with Collingwood and Penetang in capital expansion developments this year,
We will also have our secondary unit for Level I, including self-care, Haemodialysis patients
reconstructed and expanded during the coming year, Tenders have just been received.
This construction project will necessitate setting up a temporary Dialysis Unit in the
hospital's largest meeting room for a 6-month period, The current level of service will
currently be maintained and it is inevitable that caseload volumes will increase both at our
site and the satellites. In addition to fonnula driven piecemeal funding for service growth
this year, we received some additional funding for our out-patient service base including
Dialysis Technologist and Clinical Nurse Specialist, The impact on our in-patient beds,
however, has been extremely significant and costly with pronounced increases over the past
few years, Thus far, supplementary infrastructure/host hospital funding assistance has
not been made available although this issue has been discussed with Ministry staff and we
understand that it is currently under review.
Hip & Knee Joint Replacement Services:
Last yea r we did 22 hips and 15 knees and plan to increase activity in these areas in the
coming year.
Regional Genetics:
Our Regional Satellite Genetics Clinic of the North York General Hospital will receive a
modest staffing increase of 0.1 Clerk this year. Service levels will be maintained.
Sexual Assault/Domestic Violence Treatment Centre:
Our Regional Sexual Assault Program has been funded to provide a 0.64 FrE increase in
RN staffmg. It should be noted that our SA/DV Co-ordinator recently received funding
approval from the Social Sciences & Humanities Research Council of Canada to conduct
much needed research which in part will attempt to identify predictors of Domestic
Violence. Planning and preparation for the research project will not be completed until the
end of the current calendar year at which time the actual research will commence.
36
Recently Announced Provincial Initiatives:
,/
,5 I~~Y?
Maternal/Newborn - 50-Hour Post Partum Stay:
We are in compliance with the requirements of this initiative.
Emergency Services:
We are participating in the Central East Regional approach to collaborative planning and
management of Emergency Services, We never have had the option of RDC or CCB. We
received funding for five tempora.ry flex beds this past year, but essentially we were forced
to open more than this number on a permanent basis, Overall, we had comparatively good
success in dealing with influenza this Winter. Sixty-five percent of our staff was vaccinated
and we have by far had the lowest sick leave experience for the Winter season in...... more than
a decade. . .
In collaboration with the Simcoe CCACwe .~~ve introduced 1.6 Case Workers in the
Emergency Department in Janua.ry who ate screening patients and providing a quick
response service. The results are very promi'sing so far.
i
"
Weare fully participating in the NARCS Program, Health Records staffing has had to be
increased as noted previously,
We have had the new 5-stage triage program since a year before it became a requirement.
It has, however, been quite challenging and we are introducing additional staffing to make
it a dedicated service as a result of volume increases of approximately 3% in each of the
last two years.
37
E
/ /'
,3 I -(jet
Human Resources Plan
The following summarizes the changes that will take place in the year 2001-2002 budget,
From the outset of developing the Operating Plan, we received a very clear message from
staff and managers throughout the Hospital. In order to maintain the levels of patient care
there simply had to be more staffing resources provided. It is well known that Soldiers'
Memorial hospital is one of the most cost-efficient Hospitals in the Province. Indeed our
case-cost for 1999-2000 is $2,011.00 which is a decrease of $192,00 from the 1998-1999
cost per case of $2,203,00, This may very likely be the lowest case-cost in the Prj>vince.
Our continued ranking as one of the best does not come without a price however, and that
price is staff burnout and fatigue. Itis evident that this level of efficiency is not sustainable
and this Operating Plan attempts to correct the under-resourcing when it comes to staffing,
The following highlights the areas where staffing increases are planned and as can be seen
from the attached summary, over 90% of the planned staffing adjustments are in Clinical
Care areas,
The OHA Hospital Report Card 2001 reveals that, in 1998-99, 83,52% of our total in-
patient care hours were direct nursing care hours, compared with the provincial average of
77,01%, Similarly, 72,3% of total hospital staff hours were direct patient care hours,
compared with the provincial average of 59.29%. Our 1999-00 and 2000-01 results are
expected to be even more extreme and must be reduced, as this trend cannot continue.
While we are committed to maintaining a respectable track record of being efficient, we
have a concern that an under-resourced "sweat shop" image could work against the
attraction of new "bricks and mortar" when it comes time to recruit a significant number of
new employees for our Redevelopment Project.
Medicine
Between the two medical floors comprising 60 beds, there are increases of 2.84 RN, 1.10
RPN, .5 Unit Helper and 1.0 Ward Clerk. The RN and RPN increases are to provide for the
increased activity (8% increase in patient days over the past 2 years) as well as enhancing
coverage on the night shift. The Unit Helper and Ward Clerk are to provide coverage
between the hours of 1600 - 2000 as the positions were eliminated during the period of
budget claw backs. It is clear this assistance is necessary as they are the peak times for
visitors in the Hospital and our acuity (RIW) has increased significantly with pronounced
aging of the in-patient population and our expanding role as the sole provider of in-patient
services for Renal patients in our region.
Surgical Services
We have seen tremendous growth in surgical activity and over the past year found it
necessary to open our fourth theatre on a full-time basis. This has created significant
volume increase in all related venues. Patient days within the surgical unit have increased
. by 12.6% over the past two years and we are projecting a further increase of 6% for the
coming year, Our cases within the OR have increased by nearly 11% this past year and we
are conservatively estimating a further increase of approximately 4% for the coming year.
38
~,
'-.-.I
~vc./
t J
/
The increase of 4,02 RN on the in-patient unit along with 1,29 RPN and .2 Ward Clerk is
largely addressing the staffing levels that have been necessary to handle the increased
volume. Over the past year the final six beds available on this unit were reopened
permanently and the cost for this must be annualized. In the OR and Recovery room as
well as the Day Surgery Unit it has been necessary to increase by 5.6 RN, .5 Unit Helper,
and .9 Technical Aides, As well, an increase of ,2 RN was necessary in the OR for
Ophthalmology Service. (We are the only facility between Toronto and North Bay with
combined Fluorescein Angiography and Ophthalmology laser equipment that is shared with
Barrie Surgeons), Pre-Admission Clinic also requires .5 RN and .5 Clerical to deal with
volume increases.
ICU
Currently within our 8-bed unit, we have three RN's per shift. Due to the number of vent
cases requiring 1- 1 care we feel it necessary to increase our staffing to four per shift. As
well, the tremendously high occupancy levels on Medicine and Surgery make it difficult to
move patients out of the unit as quickly as we would sometimes like. This puts increased
pressure on the staffing levels. This change will require an increase of 1.47 RN. In
addition, Dialysis and Renal patients (up to 4 at a time) occupy an average of 2.4 ICU beds
- 38% of total ICU days. It is requested that a .5 Advance Practice RN be added to this area
to augment the level of care currently provided.
Psychiatry
Currently within our 8-bed Psychiatric Unit, we do not have trained psychiatric nurses on
the night shift, with coverage being provided by the Medical floor staff. We find this is not
an acceptable level of care, given the increased activity within Medicine as well as the more
frequently occurring issue of not being able to transfer Form 1 patients to other facilities.
The RIW for Psychiatric patients is 1.49, To ensure we have 24-hour coverage with trained
psychiatry nurses, this will require an increase of 1.53 RN.
Complex Continuing Care
We continue to experience a higher level of acuity when it comes to these patients and have
seen a steady increase in Length-of-Stay, Although our Length-of-Stay is still highly
efficient at 44,6 days, it is a dramatic increase from 1998/99 when we were at 32.9 days,
Patient Days have also increased by 14% during that same time frame and staff is fmding it
extremely difficult to provide appropriate levels of care. Current staffmg on this 34-bed
unit only provides for 1 RN on the night shift and this is proving inadequate with the newer
types of patients being seen, We have up to 8 Dialysis patients at a time on this Unit. To
address these issues will require an increase of 2,20 RN, 2.23 RPN and .5 Recreation
Therapist. The latter staff augmentation will bring us back to the level of 1.0 Recreation
Therapist, which we had 5 years ago.
Clinics
Ongoing growth continues to be evident in these areas, as well as the fact staff is reaching ~
increased vacation levels due to service. In the Oncology Department we require an
increase of .41RN, Also current Clerical coverage in Oncology is only 6 hours per day and
39
$/,.5'0
--requires an increase of ,2 to bring this to full-time, Although staffing adjustments have
taken place throughout the year in our Regional Dialysis Center to meet the increasing
_demands, it is also necessary to increase by .2 Staff Educator within the Home Dialysis
program. In Genetics an increase of ,1 Clerical is necessary to bring this position up to
half-time, Ambulatory Care requires .4 RPN budget increase simply to bring staffing to the
levels being utilized, Growth within Endoscopy necessitates an increase of .2 RN, and with
the implementation this past year of our Urodynamics Clinic, which runs one day per week,
we will require .2 RN. The Diabetic Clinics, both Adult and Paediatric are experiencing
increased waiting times beyond acceptable levels and will require ,22 RN and .59 Clerical to
help in addressing this problem.
Heart Function Program
The Heart Function Program, although only implemented one year ago has been an instant
success and we are seeing levels of activity that far exceed the original expectations of this
program, Experience elsewhere has demonstrated that this concept reduces repeat
congestive heart failure admissions by 50%. It is currently staffed with 1.0 FTE RN,
however, it is evident this service is much needed and definitely needs to be expanded
because of our overhead capacity, In order to provide the full range of services the clients
require the following resources are necessary: .5 RN, .2 Cardio Tech., .2 Dietitian,
,2 Exercise Specialist, .2 Pharmacist, and .2 Clerical Support, These levels essentially
provide for one day weekly for clinic time. If we do it right, meeting all standards, this
Program should prove to be as successful as our highly recognized initiatives in Diabetes
management and should serve as a model for others to follow. In the broad picture, best
practice'is the most cost effective practice and we are compelled to strive for no less to
create some additional capacity within our limited beds.
Emergency
Although we continue to see increased visits within the Emergency Department (6% growth
over the past 2 years), we are also seeing increased acuity associated with aging of the
patients that do present. Along with the increased role surrounding Triage requirements
and to simply address the current staffmg usage, it is necessary to increase by 2.45 RN. A
request for .33 Educator is also being made, within this position being shared with other
areas in the Hospital. In addition, funding for 1.6 CCAC Case Workers (Quick Response
Program) introduced during the last half of 2000-01 needs to be annualized.
Nursing Administration
A modest increase of ,1 Clerical within the "GRASP" process is necessary to provide relief
coverage in this ever-expanding role caused by an increase in in-patient caseload. Also, an
increase of ,6 Chaplain has been identified to bring this position to full-time status.
Pharmacy
Pharmacy staff continues to wrestle with the workload increases created by expanded roles
in the Dialysis clinics as well as the increased activity within the Oncology Department. To
meet these needs requires an increase of .2 Pharmacist, .3 Pharmacy Technician, and .5
Clerical. The Clerical position does not currently exist, however it is believed this is a more
cost-effective approach to dealing with issues such as order receiving, inventory, etc. than
40
V .(' -.0 /
requiring professional staff to perform these basic procedures. As well, a request of .4
Pharmacist has been made as part of an overall proposal for a new Arthritis program.
Chiropody
This program has seen steady and constant growth and it is becoming increasingly difficult
to meet the needs of the patient population, Ever-growing waiting lists need to be reduced
as well as the fact there is no support staff in this Department to deal with instrument
cleaning, packaging, etc. An increase of .5 Chiropodist to deal with patient activity and .5
Chiropody Assistant to deal with non-patient care issues are required to bring this service
up to current needs.
Rehabilitation Services
The response to our Asthma Clinic has 'been overwhelming and we are anticipating growth
of at least 20% per year, This has been our first year of operation for this prevention
service, which is commonplace elsewhere in community hospitals, and we are well
exceeding the original estimate of patients, The initial allocation of .5 Co-ordinator is
simply not adequate and an increase of .5 is necessary to meet this demand.
Growth in the Cardiac Rehab program is expected to increase by an additional 20% in the
coming year with the demand for this service being well documented through a District
Health Council document on Rehab services, An increase of .6 Exercise Specialist is
necessary to meet this demand,
In the Cardiology Department, increased demands due to growth in our OR activity and the
growth of Heart Function Program as well as the need for relief staff during vacations,
illness, etc, necessitate an increase of .6 Cardio Technician. The Hospital also requires an
increase of 1.6 Respiratory Therapist to provide much needed 24 hour in-house coverage,
Currently there are no Therapists within the building between 2300 and 0700 hours. With
the complexity of cases within our facility this is not acceptable. Currently staff are called
in when needed but the frequency has increased so dramatically that this system is no
longer workable as staff being called in were not paid but banked the hours to be taken off,
with the reality being the Hospital no longer has the ability to grant that time off due to
other workload pressures.
In Physiotherapy, waiting lists continue to grow beyond acceptable levels and many doctors
have given up referring, Many patients without private insurance to access other providers
are going without care. The Department is running at capacity and the request for 2.
Therapists and 1,0 Physiotherapy Assistant will allow for the program to provide seven-day
coverage, offering weekend service. The implementation of an Arthritis program will also
add to the requirements in this area.
As we move towards the establishment of an in-patient Rehab unit as well as the growth
being experienced in the hands/splints and medicine programs an increase of 1.0 Clinical
Rehab Specialist is needed to assist in the coordination and delivery of these services. An
increase of ,2 Clerical is required simply to provide relief for vacation, illness, etc, In the
Speech/ Audiology program there is currently 1 FTE to provide this service, which is largely
slanted toward children, Increased needs in providing service to Adults requires an
increase of.6 Speech Pathologist.
41
..
6 I /r"
I ;' ~.--r-
. V \,../
Radiology
Recent studies undertaken within Radiology Services have indicated a need for increased
resources in all modalities. The untimely passing of our Chief Radiologist at a time we were
also recruiting for an additional Radiologist has put tremendous strain on the staff and
Physicians in this area to not only maintain the level of service in place, but also deal with
the increased demands for CT, ultrasound, etc. Report turnaround time has deteriorated
due to inadequate clerical support. Overall requirements include 2,0 Clerical support, 2.23
Registered Technologist and ,7 student to assist on weekends, Growth within Emergency
and OR have also contributed to the pressure in this area.
Laboratory
Notwithstanding the significant pressure felt from the ever-growing Regional Dialysis
Program, surgery volumes and medical admissions, Laboratory Services continues to run a
highly cost-effective service as documented in regional studies. Staffing levels do need to be
adjusted to deal with these ongoing pressures and to simply recognize the level of staffmg
being utilized, Overall an increase of .9 Laboratory Assistant, .8 Technologist and .3
Clerical support are needed in this area. These staffing changes do not conflict with the
Regional Lab Reform Proposal being submitted to the Ministry.
Health Records
There has been significant impact on Health Records to meet the expanding reporting
requirements of MOH, CIHI, NARCS, etc., as well as the growing in-house needs to facilitate
the Utilization Review process and planning. An increase of ,6 Administrative Assistant to
assist in the compilation of custom in-house reports is required as well as .5
Transcriptionist to deal with basic volume increases, An increase of .6 Clerical for general
duties is somewhat offset by the decrease of .5 student which is no longer efficient due to
the increasingly complex nature of the studies undertaken.
Plant Operations/Maintenance
Staff throughout the facility have become increasingly vocal about the requirement for more
maintena nee services. Although staff works diligently to address the needs within the
facility, there currently is a backlog of more than 1800 work orders not making it up the
priority II st. With the growing activity related to the upcoming Redevelopment Project,
addition a ! resources are required. This necessitates an increase of 2.0 Certified Trades
staff as well as 1.0 Maintenance Manager. This position was eliminated during the period
of budget reductions in the early 1990s and it has proven to not be effective in terms of the
overall operation. As well, an increase of ,5 maintenance is required to deal with general
callbacks and fire alarm calls. Staff currently are only allowed to bank this time, however,
once again we are faced with Collective Agreements that require payments of a four-hour
minimum at time and one-half for callbacks. The time-in-lieu practice simply works
against resolution of the service deficiency. .
42
Personnel
/
,L. /' L::"?
o / -'J-J
Currently, the Personnel Secretary works four days per week. With the increased workload
around recruitment/retention as well as normal pressures within this discipline, it is
necessary for this coverage to be full-time requiring .2 FfE, It should be noted that this
does not provide for any relief coverage.
..
Administration
Soldiers' Memorial Hospital was one of the front-runners when it came to implementing
CQI strategies and this was seen as a critical.'element in the successes achieved,
Unfortunately a vacancy in this position during budget reductions in 1996 caused it to be
cut as a cost-saving measure. In retrospect this was shortsighted and we now find it
necessary to re-implement this role requiring;, an additional 1,0 FrE.
In the area of Public Relations, it was identified at the Board level that an expanded role
was necessary not only to tie in with the upc().ming fundraising campaign but also to raise
awareness within the community of the importance of our facility and respond to additional
public accountability advocated the OHA and politicians at all levels. This position was half
time shared with Library Services, however, an additional ,5 is required to now make this
full-time.
'"
43
/ 'ej
~' , /',
/" /
i ;'" ~\
o I \-/J ~
STAFFING INCREASE - SUMMARY OF FTE'S
CLINICAL DIAGNOSTIC ADMIN. MANAGEMENT
SUPPORT
Registered Nurse 22.34
RPN 5.02
Unit Helper 1.0
Ward Clerk 3.19
Nurse Educator 1.03
Recreation Therapist .50 -
Technical Aide - OR .90
Phannacist .80
Phannacy Technician .30
Chiropodist .50
Chiropody Assistant .50
Exercise Specialist 1.80
LablRadiology 3.63
Technologist
Physio/OT Therapist 4.20
Physio/OT Assistant 2.10
Clerical Relief 3.90 ,2
Dietician ,20
Mairitenance Manager 1.0
Maintenance - General 2.5
Public Relations .5
DIRECTOR
CQI Co-ordinator 1.0
Student .7
Chaplain ,6
Asthma Clinic .5
TOTAL 39,18 14.03 3.7 1.5
TOTAL 58.41 FTE
44
ORILLIA SOLDIERS' MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
0~ .. _/,
/ ~ <C, "
. 4 ~ J, 1
'--'" "-'
NURSING PLAN 2001 - 2002
INTRODUCTION
We continue to look for creative ways to provide patient care with limited resources. However, with the
increased volume of patients through the Emergency Department, the increased acuity of our aging population,
and the increase in our surgical volumes, we are faced with many challenges in meeting the increasing
workload. In order to respond to the challenge of our surgical volume increase, we have opened the last six beds
in the hospital and added resources to meet some of the increase in workload. Admitted patients being held in
our Emergency have become a daily occurrence and safety for these patients is often questioned, We focused
this year on the UtilizationfDischarge Planning roles and with the assistance ITom the Ministry were able to add
a caseworker ITom CCAC in the Emergency Department. This will assist in placing patients appropriately and
hopefully will prevent some admissions. This year the plan is to provide sufficient staffing to meet the demands
of acuity and volume increases.
OUTCOMES of 2000 - 2001 Nursin1! Plan
During 2000 - 2001 we have used 23,676 hours (12,2 FTE) RN, and 3,314 hours (1.7 FTE) RPN more than
1999 - 2000.
Th :6 11
ffi
dded' th b d t f; 2000 2001
e 0 owmg sta ng was a ill e u ge or - ,
Department Category FTE
Medical Units RN 5,38
Surgical Unit RN 0.5
RPN 0.9
ICU RN 1.0
CCC Unit Helper 0.5
Oncology Clerk 0,13
Dialysis RN 0.91
RPN 0,58
Social Worker 0.2
Home Dia!vs1s RN 1.0
Emergency RN 0.25
Ambulatory Care RPN 0.24
Day Surgery Clerk 1.0
PAC RN 0.05
Sexual Assaul t RN 0.64
Ophthalmology Clinic RN 0.1
Diabetic Education Center RN 0.31
Dietician 0,12
45
.
w
"
.
/, //
-5 I ,!jU
. The following has been implemented,
of
. CHANGE REASON OUTCOME
Emergency Critical - 24 hours, 7 days per week (2-12 - initiated in 1999
Care hr) to provide clinical hours in - made a definite decrease in staff
RN 4.5 FTE ER/Critical Care when required to stress and workload initially, but
meet the workload demands during past year it was evident by
during peak activity and during the number of workload alerts, that
critical care incidents the ER staffing budget needs to be
- hours will be utilized whenever increased and an RN for dedicated
the need is required triage has been requested
- to assist in meeting volume needs
during seasonal variations in ~
patient volume and/or acuity
Nursing Units - added staff nurse in role of - initiated in January
RN Resource Nurse Resource Nurse to enhance the - evaluated in March
Medical Unit - RN I continuum of care for our patients - outcomes positive
FTE and provide a catalyst for nursing - role extended for a further 3 months
utilization and improving nursing and outcomes will then be
practice evaluated again
Heart Function - to develop a clinic whi?h will - implemented March 2000
Program RN 1.0 FTE provide education, improved - outcomes positive
quality of life and improved - budget request to expand program
utilization of beds to include other disciplines -
phannacy, dietitian, cardio-resp,
educator hours
- added .2 for vacation relief
EducationlCI inical - to provide clinical leadership and - initiated Education Coordinator role
Support support to frontline staff and assist in fall 2000
CNS -2 FTE in the development of professional - CNS Geriatrics added for the
Education Co-ord -1 practice which was identified in hospital in Dec 2000
FTE focus groups - CNS Obstetrics and Pediatrics
added in September 2000
- Continue to advertise for CNS
Dialysis
Manager 1. 0 FTE - Managers ' - Added manager ICU/Medicine
workload/responsibilities have - Allowed Nurse Manager for Special
increased as the management FTE Medical Programs to focus on
was reduced (this was done in an Rehab, Oncology, Palliative Care
attempt not to decrease frontline and Psychiatry and
staffing) - Allowed the Nurse Manager for
CCC to focus on planning for an
. expanded CCC
46
'-../' \.../ I
Registered Nurse - Interest by 2 RN - Initiated Dec 2000
First Assistant RN- Need identified by lack of family Positive feedback from surgeons, "
- -
2FTE physicians to assist during surgery FP, patients
- Communication with all - Is expanded role for Perioperative .
physicians nurse and is recognized by the
- Education supported by hospital College of Nurses
- Role developed in cooperation
with ONA
- Role has 3 components - preop,
intraop, post-op
- Post-op role provides follow-up
communication with all surgical
patients
- Very positive feedback -
Surgical Program - Increased output in surgical - Have requested increases in staffing
OR-RN.7 FTE program with running an budget 2001 - 2002
RR - RN 0,8 FTE additional OR necessitated
PAC - RN 0.5 FTE addition of some staffing to deal
Inpt Unit - RN 0,8 with the increase in volume
FTE
'.
...
Consultation of Staff
As identified in the two previous years, our participation in the Practice Setting Consultation Project with the
College of Nurses and the subsequent identified action plans has provided the basis for the work we are doing
with the staff to identify a quality practice setting, We have completed our second survey and are developing
the action plans, The PSCP committee (Making it Work) continues to meet with frontline staff at luncheons to
encourage input and feedback. The team is co-ordinated by a frontline staff with representation from all areas in
the Nursing department. A Consulting group made up of managers from across the continuum meets regularly
with the team and provides assistance and support. The Chief Nursing Officer sponsors the initiative.
Education and Trainin2
Staff are encouraged to continue with life long learning. The recent addition of an Education Co-ordinator will
help provide a framework and direction for the future. In 2000, we spent $62,000 in Education grants and
education days. This opportunity was available to all staff in the hospital and an interdisciplinary committee
meets to disperse the funds. This year $30,000 has been set aside for the Education Grant process
Nursin1! Stabilization and Casualization
..
During the past year we have continued to look at ways to convert part time hours to full time lines, We have
added full time lines in .the various surgical areas as volumes increased, We have begun to have discussions
with the local union representatives to look at creative scheduling and the reduced workweek, which will in
long term create additional hours for new staff. We continue to look at critical areas that require additional
staffing during peak seasons and added temporary full time lines. Some areas have developed float positions to
deal with fluctuations in volume. (OBSlPeds) In the next year we will be looking at staffing throughout the
nursing areas to deal with the increased workload and adding FT lines so we can be more proactive in
scheduling at peak times or on short notice.
47
: (t,
.
1;, /, / --I,
0!':J't,
('Role of Nurses in Decision Makin!!
,The Quality Management Program, which is, used hospital wide, strongly supports decisions being made as
close to the patient as possible. We utilize the Carver Governance principles, the Continuous Quality
Improvement process, and Complexity Science to involve front line staff in the day-to-day decisions for patient
care, Staff are involved in many project committees as well as the Patient Care Committees. There is staff
representation on the Fiscal Advisory Committee where they have direct involvement with budget planning and
decisions. The front line team led by a staff nurse which was developed as a result of the Practice Setting
Consultation Project with the College of Nurses continues and is involved in decisions regarding nursing,
nursing practice and the Quality Practice Setting, We will continue to use this team to ensure front line staff are
involved and have input into decisions.
..
.
48
i' 'J .,
./
~' ~, <:",.__~<"""1, "
JI-,)~7/
~ ./
F
Changes - 2000-2001
"-
.
Planned Chanqes Implemented 2000-2001
Open 8 remaining medical beds (fully implemented)
Hospitalists for "orphan" patients (fully implemented)
Heart Function Clinic (implemented, further expansion planned)
Asthma Clinic (implemented, further expansion planned)
Consolidate Rehab In-patients (partially implemented, .to be
completed mid-2001)
Urodynamics & Incontinence Clinic (fully implemented)
Registered Nurse First Assistants (RNFAs) (fully implemented);
outstanding positive response from patients and doctors)
Expand Sexual Assault/ Domestic Violence (implemented as per funding)
Young Parents' Resource Centre (fully implemented) (Federal funding)
Reduce Diabetic Education Clinic waiting list (temporary)
Paediatric Social Work expansion (Diabetes, Oncology, Mental Health,
Youth Crisis)
Telehealth expansion - Simcoe Network (initiated)
- Baycrest (initiated)
- HSC Child Psychiatry (initiated)
""
Nursing Plan - approved by Ministry and implemented
..
CNO Nursing Practice Setting Consultation (fIrst Ontario hospital to conduct second
survey; follow-up in progress)
49
'"
., ..
/'
Planned Changes Implemented 2000-2001
/"
/-.;-/ I /
.f _ I /~~!
(~ / -vu
Recruit CNSs: Maternity JPaeds and Geriatrics (both hired)
Staff Education Support $30,000 (tuition and time)
16 RNs working on BScN (implemented fully; positive response)
U of T Family Practice Resident Program Expansion - to 2 Residents
Dialysis:
- Integrate DEC and Renal Clinic (implemented)
- Self-Care Haemodialysis (initiated, to be expanded)
- Barrie - permanent satellite opened
- Penetang - temporary satellite expanded
permanent satellite approved
- Alliston - satellite expanded
- Collingwood - satellite expansion approved
Medical Staff Recruitment:
1 Pathologist
1 Gynaecologist
- 2 Anaesthetists
- 2 Ophthalmologists
1 General Surgeon
1 Paediatrician
- 3 GPs (2FPs)
Secure Room in ER (constructed)
Parking expansion - small expansion implemented
- larger expansion planned for Summer/Fall 2001
Planned Changes Not Achieved 2000-01
Expansion of Cardiac Rehab Program (funding not approved yet - rollover to 2001-02)
Breast Screening Clinic (CAR Accreditation received March 2001- rollover to 2001-02)
,
Redevelopment/Expansion of OSMH Secondary Dialysis Unit
(Tenders received April 20th 2001 - rollover to 2001-02)
Completion of eCHN (substantial completion; official public launch to be announced in
2001-02)
Reduce ALCs from 6% to 3,5% (4.3% achieved for first 9 months; data for last quarter not
available yet but anecdotal reports of dramatic increase to double-digit percentage in
February, March and continuing in April 2001. Currently a forecast is not possible)
50
Expand Orthopaedic Implants (rollover to 2001-02)
-----
o ~-(;,/,
Expansion of Endoscopy Capacity (impossible; abandoned due to space
and cost)
ER APP (proposal rejected by physicians)
..
CNS - Dialysis (still recruiting)
.
Medical Staff Recruitment::
1 Pathologist - recruitment continuing
1 ENT Surgeon - recruitment continuing
1 Orthopaedic Surgeon - abandoned
2 Radiologists - recruitment continuing
Unplanned Changes 2000-2001
6 remaining Surgical Beds permanently reopened
Child/ Adolescent Mobile Crisis Intervention Service (shared service agreement initiated by
New Path Youth & Family Services)
CCAC - ER Case Workers (Quick Response Service (Ministry RFP)
Consolidation of County Child Community Clinics (Govemment RFP)
Expand CT Service for Muskoka Hospitals (response to mid-year request)
Case Management Resource Nurse - Medical Complications Management (Pilot Project
successfu!; budget for permanent position in 2001-02)
Eating Dis()rders Expansion (Ministry RFP)
--.
...
51
{~.
..~ y
G
5/'~(r
Fiscal Years 2002 to 2004
A dominant focus during the next few years will be planning and preparation for the
hospital's redevelopment and expansion. The impact of aging of our service population is
becoming noticeable and will drive much of our planning activities with a growing
requirement for new or expanded services to meet the needs of the elderly. The impact of
the Regional Dialysis Program on Medical lCU and Complex Continuing Care Beds is
expected to increase, The Acute Care Length-of-Stay for these patients is already 44%
below the mean for Matched Cases in the ClHl database, so we do not expect to see any
further efficiencies in this. We will, however, examine opportunities to establish 1:1. section
in our medical beds where these patients can be massed and possibly dialyzed to cut down
pressure on our lCU beds, We also look forward to further expansion of the Dialysis
satellites.
We have received approval to expand our secondary Dialysis Unit from 6 stations to 8, as
this will be necessary in order to permit us to implement self-care within the new funding
guidelines. It is expected that this modest increase in capacity for the Regional Centre will
be required, despite the new permanent satellite in Barrie, and the permanent Penetang
Unit, which is expected to come on-line within the next year.
Consolidation of Rehab patients, currently 10 to 12 a day, in one nursing unit, along with
the development of protocols and team functioning will be pursued throughout the next few
years in preparation for a new in-patient Rehab Unit as part of the Hospital's
Redevelopment Project, We also hope to expand our Cardiac Rehab Program if additional
funds become available and integrate cardiovascular related prevention services.
We will look into adding a second Respirologist- since the current one cannot keep up with
demand, This will enable us to expand our Sleep Disorders Lab on a cost recovery basis.
We are in need of additional clinic space for out-patient services and hope to find some way
to provide for this off site prior to opening of the new wing,
Workload In our Oncology Clinic increased by more than 30% a year ago. The clinic space
was doubled in a cost-sharing project with the Ministry last year. The issue now is to keep
staffing up with the unexpected continuing increase in workload and evolving therapeutic
standards.
.
The Pre-Construction Operating Plan for our Redevelopment Project will be submitted in
2002.
52
/
~ / /" r',
J ,. "/ ./
.~, \...t:f',
.-J
H
....
Operating Plan Committee
.
Our Fiscal Advisory Committee membership is as follows:
one ele~ted Clerical Employee (non-union)- Elizabeth Murray, Secretary Pathology Service;
one elected Paramedical (non-union)- Judith Sherman-Jones, Laboratory;
one Staff Nurse Representative (aNA) - Sheila Kirkland, RN-BANFS;
one Service Employee Representative (SEIU Local 204) - Regina Henson - SPD Aide;
four Assistant Executive Directors -
Taylor Cuthbertson, AED Patient Care Services
Edward Novosky, AED Administrative Services
Ronald Colpitts, AED Support Services
Varouj Eskedjian, AED Corporate Services;
Chief of Medical Staff - Dr; Norman Kee; and,
Executive Director - Glen Penwarden
..
53
?,i-
..'1 ,.
~' - 0 c/
April 10, 200 I
Mr. Michael Klejman, Regional Director
Ministry of Health and Long-Tenn Care
Central East Region
465 Davis Drive, 3rd Floor
Newrnarket, Ontario
L3Y 8T2
,-
Re: Network 1 - Rural and Northern Network Implementation Plans
Dear Michael:
There appears to have been some misunderstanding with respect to our submission of the Rural and Northern
Network Implementation Plans, for which I apologize, The chart attached to the correspondence to Mr. Torn
Robinson which we received on March 7th and the chart which accompanied the Operating Plan Guidelines for
Submission seemed very similar, so it was our intention to submit our updated implementation plans with our
operating plans on April 20th. As you will recall, we have previously submitted correspondence regarding the
status of the siting and implementation of acute and non-acute care beds.
I have attached an updated implementation plan for Network 1 for your infonnation and review. This same
chart win also appear in each of our operating plans to be submitted later this month. If you should have any
questions regarding the attached, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Paul W. Darby
Chief Executive Officer
'II PWD:js
att,
c. Mr, T. Robinson, Chair, Network I
Network I CEO's
54
Supplementary Report for Implementation of Rural and Northern Hospital Networks
Table 1: Status of Network ImDI
ementation
Comments
Progress To Date Expected Date of Next Steps I Planned Activities
Implementation
Statement of vision. mission and core . Completed . Done
values of the network
Configuration of programs across sites and . Completed based on 2003 planning . Require MOH . Retain consultants
siting of non-acute services applying the horizon support
updated clinical and financial benchmarks
. Support DHC in study to determine . Study to be
service needs completed in
over next 1 0-12 years 2001/02
Medical human resource planning and . Areas of most pressing medical need . Ongoing . Regional recruiting for nurses ongoing
recruitment and retention strategies identified . Sharing of casual pool
. Inventory of medical manpower needs
Clinical linkages with secondary referral . Ongoing meetings with Newmarket re: . Ongoing . Develop relationship based on most pressi
hospitals cardiac care; CCO re: regional cancer access challenges
centre and PMHC, RVH & Orillia re:
Schedule 1 facilities
. Many pre-network linkages established,
eg, Baycrest, Sick Children's etc,
Strategies for consolidation and sharing of . Common application form developed for . Opportunities are evaluated on an ongoing
administrative and support services, medical staff, basis
common medical staff and governance . Shared trustee development education has
occurred & is planned
. Care maps for various diagnoses shared
across network
. 4/7 network partners running common
HIS system
. Historical relationships attached
Mechanisms to monitor quality and access . Quality of care is an individual hospital . Access to care monitoring will develop as
responsibility . 2001/02 Info Systems develop and network matures
. County-wide QA program being
developed for lab services
Plan for implementing a common or . 4/7 network hospitals running on same . 4/7 hospitals . Qther network partners will evaluate merit
shared infonnation system IDS system completed of implementing network system when thei
existing patient care system requires
\
replacement
Strategies for involving District Health . 2 DHC Executive Directors are ex-officio . As relationship of 7 + I network partners
Councils, CCACs, and other community per Network Agreement develops and matures, other partners will bt
providers . Other partners routinely consulted as considered
necessary
b....
April, 20tH
55
.
(~_I 0'\ _ \ Ci
-/
. [.
SUoiCOE y,iUSJ{OP CLtlUCi\L "P AI-l'fNEl\S1II!'~
.
.
~ .......-...
..--~..,..
, UDU
;J~!!~." .,--
\
------- ~/-- '
-~O'
~~t&!
-
M-te,
--
~,
~c
~
oerrnatolO~
~e
~g,
Dialysis
~rders
ECT
:..--:::
BBG
~
~~ny
~-
~
GeriatriC
~atry
~
MRl
~~
~~~t.
~gy CliPi~
~-
~olOg'i
~
~
~ware
~
'Peds oncolo~
~~
~~ser'"
~.
~ult
Sleep 'Lab
~ology
3{or all nos'Oitals
3 OSM.1\ \ 3~
~ {or 'P~HC
3for all nos'Oitals
~ci)
3 OSMH
~
3 RV1\
3 {or 'PM-1\C
~ita1S
~s
~
~t
3 Ba'lcres
3 RV1\
3 R '\T1l
3 for 'PM-1\C
3QSMH ~
~\3~
~
~1\
~
%1\
~H
3 Sty).
RVH
~1\
~
,R"
3 OSM1\
, R '\T1l
~3 RV11.
~
~S~1:\
30
~~
3~~
3RV1l
~
~
1: otonto
~
%
~
~1\
30.:>
3 RVH
~
3RV11.
'3 OSMB
~
%
3 RV
~ .
,.;';-' <
~-
}tW
'3 OSM1:\
3 OSM1:\
, for 'PM1:\C
~
S~
'3 oSM1\ (C1:)
~oS'Oit~MB.
'3f~a ~
3 oSMB.
'3 OSMH
-::\, n.os~~VH
3f~ \ ~1-1'"
3 CGty).
,CGM-1:\ '"
3 OSM.1:\
'3 CGM.1:\ \ 3CGMl! '"
~M-1!
30~
'3 OSM1:\
~
3 osMJ:!.
'3 RVH
~
,R
~~
'3 \tv):J.,
~... A",vnl
56
'3 RVH
\ \ , OSMH
30~C
J\
.....
3 osM.t1
\
C....,
C'
~s~
30
------
*
~:
a caMl! baS fostered regiooalrelationsroP' with all SiJtlC08l1ospital. in the areas of EmPloyee Benefit Plan, LaboratOry Services, Regional Education, Regional
Infection Control. Diabetes Education. Regional Biomedical Contract.
PrimarilY LTC facilities In eaeh co_unItY
a Algonquin US pro.wes a nuUlber of services for the northe....areas oftbe region: paeemak.er prowa-inl!" gastroenterology, OlllGyn, nuclear Uledl.;!Jt'
oncology, dialysis.
a pe_ng Gll provides rehah .ervlees across the ne\Work. and diabetes education for Christian bland.
April 2001
C"
''\
....."'-
..
\~
~
." \
.. .
57
V ~}unteer Firefighters in Jeopardy
130
v'~c./~M Page 1 Of~ GS I
(C!!C &x c&: - I
4
---..-.--------- ---
ALERTO'
\t14.
__......O!~"'._
393 Un~ Ave.. Sut1e 170'
Taonto, On MSG 'EO
te\:(416)971-98S6 ~:l4'\6)971-6191
emall~ amo@amo.n"Iunkom.(:om
Memb~r, CQmmunication
To the attention of the CAO, Clerk or Head of Council
For immediate Action
March 4,2002
Alert. 02/004
VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTERS IN JEOPARDY
Issue: Firefighters who volunteer are being pressured to resign as volunteers or lose their full time
jobs,
Background:
In late December 1999, AMO advised its members about the potential pressure from the
International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF) to force its "double hatter" members to stop working
as volunteers in other municipal fire departments, (See Alert 99/029). Soon after the Alert was
released, AMO was assured that little or no action was likely to occur, This is no longer the case.
Union locals began to take steps against "double hatters" who work full-time and as a result of
municipal amalgamation are now volunteers within the same municipality, Also .double hatters"
who work full-time in one municipality and volunteer in another are being targeted. Firefighters are
being charged, and threatened with being charged under the International Association of Fire
Fighters' (IAFF) Constitution, If firefighters are expelled from the union for being "double hatters.,
they may lose their full-time jobs,
Lloyd Churchill, Chair of the Rural Ontario Municipal Association (ROMA) advises that the attack on
"double hatter" volunteers will have a disproportionate impact on rural Ontario, and could create a
public safety crisis in many communities, About 2,000 of Ontario's 17,000 volunteers are "double
haners." Because of their training and experience, they are the leaders in many rural fire services.
Ann Mulvale, AMO President is similarly ensuring that the government understands the negative
Impact that the loss of "double hatters" will have in communities, "In addition to the fire suppression
concerns, already one of our members advises us that it would cost their community almost $2
million every year to replace their "double hatters" with full-timers, Clearly this puts significant
pressure on property taxes, even more so in rural Ontario:
The problem can be solved by amending the Fire Protection and Prevention Act (FPPA), so that
.double hatters. remain employed despite the actions of firefighter unions, Similar legislative
protections are available to firefighters in other Provinces. The inclusion of a duty of fair
representation provision in the Act would also be helpful.
Action: This issue was raised at the recent ROMA conference as well as numerous meetings that
AMO has held, AMO will be working with its members and seeks their input on union actions and
the impacts losing "double hatters" will have on municipalities, AMO members are strongly
encouraged to raise this issue and the solutions with their MPP's, AMO will keep its members
updated.
I"'\n ''''''3 ',...^1\1""t!
This information is available through AMO's subscription based Municom network at
www.municom.com.
For more information contact: Jeff Fisher, AMO Senior Policy Advisor at (416) 971-9856, ext.
For transmission problems: (416) 971-9856.
http://www.rnunicorn.comIPu blicationsI13/020304_alt.html
GC,-~
J
08/0312002 .
Fe &c'~3
. Ire ORILLIA PACKET & TIMES TUESDAY, MARCH 19,2002 .
I
By Jim Purnell
The Packet & Times
Fire
protocol
could be
costly
Response time
guideline may mean
, dty has to pay for
(more firefighters
The cost of meeting a new
provincial guideline calling
for firefighters to respond
more quickly to fires could
'burn a hole in the City of Oril-
lia's wallet.
The Orillia Fire Depart-
ment is among about 50 fire
departments falling short of
the Ontario Fire Marshal's
(OFM) guideline that 10 flre-
fighters with two trucks
should be at a house fire with-
in 10 minutes of receiving a
call 90 per cent of the time,
"I think it's very impor-
tant that council realizes that
this could represent a very se-
rious financial burden on this
city," said Mayor Ron Stevens
during dj,scussiono,f a report
about the Fire Marshal's
guideline at Monday Ilight's .
council committee meeting.
The OrilliaFire Depart-
ment has five full-time staff on
shift most of the time and four
the rest, and tries to have at
least six volunteer firefighters
respond to calls, said Stevens.
Orillia Fire Chief Trent
Elyea said that the Fire Mar-
shal's office couldoroer Oril-
lia to have more full-time fire-
fighters on duty to meet its
guideJine, costing the city
thousands of dollars.
For more, please see Fire
on Page 3.
Continued from Page 1
Elyea also said he has
been working closely with the
Fire Marshal's office to re-
solve the response time issue.
.~lthough we are not
meeting the guidelines, we're
within a couple of minutes of
the Fire Marshal's goal, and
we are working toward it,"
said Elyea,
"It doesn't necessarily
mean that we're not meeting
the needs and concerns of the
city-I feel weare," he a4ded.
He said at least one fire
truck with four firefighters is
usually on the scene of an
emergency within four to six
minutes. '
If the fire department does
not meet the OFM guideline
, established last year, Elyea
. could be flned. However,
E1yea said he's not concerned
about being fined because
he's working with the Fire
Marshal's office,
"We've been working
closely with the Fire Mar-
shal's office since last April to
improve our response time,"
Elyea said.
The fire department is re-
viewing different ways of re-
sponding to alarms such as
sending volunteers directly to
fires instead ()f reporting to
the flre hall in some in-
stances.
E1yea is expecting a report
back from the Fire Marshal's
office with its recommenda-
tions fo1' improving service
once the Ontario civllservice
strike is resolved.
,
~ol-/
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
REPORT
DEP ARTMENT REPORT TO: PREPARED BY:
Fire Report # 2002-04 Members of Council Paul Eenhoorn, Fire Chief
SUBJECT: DEPARTMENT:
Council
Monthly Fire Report Fire and Emergency
Services
C. of W. For February, 2002
DATE:
Motion #
March 18, 2002
Date
DATE
STATION
TIME
TYPE
LOCATION
DAMAGE
Station #U Carbon 5005 Vasey Road
Feb. 2,2002 Moonstone 07:56:01 Monoxide Call
Station #1 Electrical 855 Ridge Road
Feb. 4,2002 Shanty Bav 11: 46: 55 Overheat West
Station #5 Ambulance 16 Goss Road
Feb. 4,2002 Warminster 02: 15:40 Assist Call
, Station #2 Alarm - No East Oro Public
i
, Feb. 6, 2002 Hawkestone 15:44:40 Fire! Accidental School, 744 Line 11 N.
Station #4 Motor Vehicle Line 11 North and
Feb. 6,2002 Ruabv 09:02:50 Accident 15/16 Side Road
Station #5 Ambulance 4020 Line 13
Feb. 7,2002 Warminster 02: 08:37 Assist Call North
Station #U Ambulance 6 Agnes Road
Feb. 9,2002 Moonstone 01: 13:58 Assist Call
Station #U Ambulance Mt. S1. Louis Ski
Feb. 9,2002 Moonstone 13:20:20 Assist Call Resort
Station #2 Ice Water Line 12 South at
i Feb. 10,2002 Hawkestone 17:31:20 Rescue the Lake / Fisherman
, Station #1 Ambulance 2309 Highway 11
Feb. 11,2002 Shanty Bav 15:02:05 Assist Call North
Station #4 Ambulance 82 Cameron Drive,
Feb. 12,2002 RUQby 08:22:46 Assist Call BiQ Cedar Estates
Station #U Motor Vehicle Moonstone Rd,
Feb. 12,2002 Moonstone 18:09:00 Roll Over Between Line 4 & 5
Station #1 Motor Vehicle Highway 11 SIB, In
Feb. 12,2002 Shanty Bay 17: 15: 15 Roll Over Gasoline Alley
Station #5 Ambulance Bass Lake Provincial
Feb. 12,2002 Warminster 12:36:06 Assist Call Park
Go/-:J-
~
Fire Report 2002-04 Con't ...2
DATE
STATION
TIME
TYPE
LOCATION
DAMAGE
Station #3 Motor Vehicle Bass Lake Side Road
Feb. 12,2002 Horseshoe 12: 19:45 Accident East, (past # 2591)
Station #1 Carbon 13 Baycrest Drive
Feb. 13,2002 Shanty Bay 08:36:31 Monoxide Call
Station #2 Ambulance 48 Mill Street
Feb. 14,2002 Hawkestone 04: 16:00 Assist Call
Station #1 Ambulance 644 Line 2 North
Feb. 14,2002 Shanty Bay 21:24:20 Assist Call
Station #1 Chimney 21 Graham Street
Feb. 14,2002 Shanty Bay 23:46:03 Overheat
Station #3 Ambulance 3766 Line 7 North
Feb. 15,2002 Horseshoe 14: 17:22 Assist Call
Station #4 Ambulance 3 Orr Drive
Feb. 19,2002 Rugby 19:49:35 Assist Call
Station #3 Unauthorized Line 3 North off
Feb. 20, 2002 Horseshoe 18:37:09 Bum Old Barrie Road
Station #6 Male Trapped 760 Moonstone
Feb. 22,2002 Moonstone 20:51:08 bv Tractor Road
Station #1 Motor Vehicle Highway 11 SIB,
Feb. 26,2002 Shanty Bay 21:36:55 Roll Over between Line 3 & 4
Station #1 Motor Vehicle Highway 11 NIB,
Feb. 27,2002 Shanty Bay 09:03:48 Roll Over North of Line 5
Station #2 Vehicle Highway 11 SIB
Feb. 28,2002 Hawkestone 15: 12: 17 Overheat
Station #3 Motor Vehicle Line 3 North and
Feb. 28,2002 Horseshoe 12:26:22 Accident Old Barrie Rd. W.
I
Structure and Vehicle Fire
Dollar Value Lost
Dollar Value Saved
$ .00
$.00
Ambulance Assist Calls comparison: February calls 2001 - 4, 2002 - 11
vcr ~ ,-.)
..
Monthly Fire Report for February, 2002
Training Sessions
Station #1
Station #2
Station #5
Shanty Bay
Hawkestone
Warminster
2
2
2
Station #3
Station #4
Station #6
Horseshoe
Rugby
Moonstone
2
2
2
Inspection Record for the Month (including Fire Prevention / Public Education)
Commercial 3 Residential/Bed & Breakfast
Industrial Schools / Assembly / Church 5
Woodstove Daycare / Camps I Hall Tours
Comments or Recommendations by Fire Chief and/or Deputy Fire Chief
Extra training / Seminars and Events Attended
Emergency Mgmt. Briefing Seminar / Barrie
Lindsay Trade Show
Fire Safety House Meeting / Fire Prevention - Public Education
Base Hospital Meeting
Trainer Facilitators Meeting
Respectfully submitted,
P&~~f
C.A.O. COMMENTS:
DATE:
C.A.O.
DEPT. HEAD
Ce-/
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
REPORT
DEPARTMENT REPORT TO: PREPARED BY:
Fire Report # 2002-05 Members of Council Paul Eenhoorn, Fire Chief
SUBJECT: DEPARTMENT:
Council
AED Equipment, Fire and Emergency
Base Hospital AED Services
Training Program
and Certifications
C. of W.
DATE:
Motion #
March 18, 2002
Date
BACKGROUND
In December of 2001, Mr. Eric O'Brien of the Oro Lions contacted me regarding
the purchasing of Defibrillators for the Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency
Services. The Oro Lions committed up to $13,000,00 for this project.
ANAL YSIS
On February 4, 2002 we met with Mr. Tim Waite, Clinical Co-ordinator for the
Base Hospital for Simcoe and Muskoka, and Doctor Mike Murray of the Royal
Victoria Hospital of Barrie, regarding the delivery of the AED (Automatic External
Defibrillator) Training Program and Certifications. After certification, our
firefighters will be delivering these services under the medical license of Doctor
Murray from the Base Hospital. He will monitor all calls and provide
administration to ensure the program is delivered properly by our firefighters.
In order to reduce costs for training, the Base Hospital agreed to train 6 of our
own Facilitators to deliver the program,
We contacted Ms. Joanne Graveline, Medical Services Co-ordinator for the
County of Simcoe regarding the purchasing of defibrillators through the County
as she is purchasing numerous units for the Health Trust Ambulance Service.
(Pe- d-
This partnering would provide compatibility and produce an excellent price per
unit with a 18% saving, (see attached).
Fire Report # 2002-05 ....2
ANALYSIS Con't ...
=
$ 25,898.88
972.00
1 ,161,72
811.80
777.00
6 x Lifepak 500 AEO units @ 4,316.48
6 x Lifepak 500 rechargeable battery packs
6 x battery charger
6 x soft shell carrying cases
2 x Lifepak 500T AED training systems
=
=
=
=
TOTAL
=
$ 29,621.40 (plus taxes)
Base Hospital 2002
AEO Training I Certification and 1 year program administration for 6 facilitators
and 100 firefighters = $ 5,722,00
Base Hospital 2003
AED Training I Certification and year 2 program administration
$ 4,160.00
- Cost for defibrillators and equipment = $ 29,621.40
- Minus Oro Lions Contribution = -13,000.00
COST = $ 16,621.40
- Plus Sase Hospital Certifications = + 5,722,00
TOTAL COST = $ 21,343.40
/' ~
(ye-v
Fire Report # 2002-05 ....3
RECOMMENDATIONS
>- That Council adopts this report
>- That we partner with the Oro Lions to purchase the AED equipment for all 6
stations
>- That we use the Base Hospital Training I Administration Program.
- Q/Y\ovt ~ VV\ :4bo J- ~.~
~ GO~ ,GU'S1 a( ~V,~~ '
6",^{~ ~~'
Respectfully submitted,
.'/~
,/ /. "".,/'
/~" ;~
Paul Eenhoorn, Fire Chief
~~
DATE: t(t1PJJ:JfO
C.A.O. COMMENTS:
. '
. THE ROYAL VICTORIAHOSPITALOFBA.RRIE
201 GEQRGIANDRIVE !3ARRIE QNT ARlO L4M 6M2 TELr::PHQNE (705) 7.28-~802
{ge-y
March 13,2002
Fire Chief Paul Eenhoom
Oro-Medonte Township Fire Department
20 Allan Street, PIO. Box 179
HA WKESTONE, Ontario
LOL 1 TO
Dear Fire Chief Eenhoom:
I have enclosed an estimate for the Train the Trainer and program administration of the AED
program for your fire department. Please accept my apologies for the delay in sending this to
you.
Please call me at the Base Hospital (705) 721-0169 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
E. /J-L '
V"'-- rl \
im \\' aite, Clinical Co-ordinator
The Base Hospital for Simcoe & Muskoka
THE ROYAL VICTORIA HOSPIT
TW: Ie f
Enc\.
Wellington Street West, Barrie, Ontario, IAN ] K4, (705)
, .
Oro Medonte Fire Department
AED Training/Certification &
Year I Program Administration
Estimate
Estimate based on training of 4-6 AED Instructors
Training - 12 hours
AED CoordinatorlInstructor
AED manuals ($7 each)
Equipment Rental
Total Training
12 hrs, @ $40 hr.
AED CoordinatotflInstructor monitoring
30 hrs. @ $40 hr. =
Medical Director stipend for program direction:
100 Fire Fighters
Hospital Administration:
100 Fire Fighters
TOT AL YEAR I TRAINING & CERTIFICATION
=
$480
42
300
=
{ye-6
$822
$1,200
$1,700
$2,000
$5,722
Oro Medonte Fire Department
AED Training/Recertification &
Year II Program Administration
Estimate
Recertification of 4-6 AED Instructors:
Training
AED Coordinator/Instructor
Equipment Rental
Total Training
4 hrs. @ $40 hr,
Medical Director stipend for program direction:
100 Fire Fighters
Hospital Administration:
100 Fire Fighters
=
$160
300
Ge-u
$460
$1,700
$2.000
I TOTAL YEAR TWO
$4,160
# .
RVH Base Hospital
for Simcoe/Muskoka
Fee Structure
Annual Medical Direction stipend for program guidance:
1 - 10 Fire Fighters
11 - 20 Fire Fighters
> 20 Fire Fighters
Hospital Administration
1- 10 Fire Fighters
11 - 20 Fire Fighters
21 - 30 Fire Fighters
31 - 50 FireFighters
51 - 100 Fire Fighters
roc-1-
$250
$500
$500 + $15/Fire Fighter> 20
$750
$1,000
$1,250
$1,500
$2,000
MEDTRONJC PHYSJO..cONTROl CORPORAT1ON
eu.tomer StHvfce a\'IQJ OIItaritI S"'3 OftiQII
6733 I<Itllul Road 6733 Kiti......t Ro.cI
M1s~u.AUgI1. OntariO 15N 1m Mississauva. Ontario UN 1W3
TEL 18OS) &79-0971 FAX (&88) 206.113'13 'TElIBOO) 217-1617 Ext. 531 FAX 1418) 221.9401
Coe, 0
\1,4,(-(
PHYSIO-CONTRO!L
(..-
4/6
Cj f? c::-. )I V r3 5
QUOTE. TO:
rile CwnIy of Simcoe
A TTN:
\--
PII. 70S- 728-9300 x155
F..
j
EFFEC11VE: .IaNIaI'!r :rr. 2D02
EXPIRES: MarCh 27, 1002
lIFEPAK 500 AED (ADAPTIV BIphnk:)
Thlelt button op8I'IItkIn
uFEpAK 500 ~8ftlab1o sealed lead acid bettely p8k
BeIl.IV cnwgw
Complete 10ft .heII ClllT}ing aile ','
UFEPAK 600T AED Training Sy~
......
PIN PRICE QTY SUB-TOTAl. DISC % NET
3011780 t S,2a4.DO 1 S 5.264.00 18.0%. $ .. ,3 U5,..s
S 1 . S
3005319-000 $ 11111.00 1 S 188.00 18.0% II 162.36
3011200.000 $ 236.00 1 ; * 238.00 18.0% S 193.52
30053113-006 S 185.00 1 S 165.00 18.0% S 135.30
30127t+OO . 475.00 1 S 475.00 18.0% I 368.50
DESCRIPTION
$
6.:)~OO
S
PST S
AT $
TWiI $
5,117.1'
.
41&.77
313.110
5,'7'.1)
Notes
F.0.8.: Detlinlrtoft. FREIGHT: p~ and dIaI'ged; HAHOUNO FEE: S30 per capital ordw. $15 per llWluoty 0I'dItr
-reRMS: Net 10 .ya
Mati McKimm. T emtD<y ....1\1IVIIf
01I28l2OO2
TOTAL P. 01
0!-/
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
FROM THE DIRECTOR OF BUILDINGfPLANNING
DEVELOPMENT
REPORT TO COUNCIL
REPORT NO.:
BD2002-2
Council:
PREPARED BY:
Ron Kolbe
C. of W.
DATE:
March 5, 2002
Motion #
SUBJECT:
Kennel License Application
Date
~
IBACKGROUND
Kimberley MacDonald and Terrence Clark of 1897 Line 1 North, Lot 28, Concession
2(Oro) as detailed on the Map (Attachment #1) have applied for a kennel license
(Attachment #2).
Prl.sently in Oro-Medonte there are 29 existing kennels (Attachment #3).
Tlw procedure for kennel approvals is as follows:
1. Request is directed to Director of Building/Planning Development with
pertinent information,
Request is directed to Township Planner for zoning compliance.
Request is directed to Council for approval.
.,
J he Township Zoning Bylaw addressed kennels, with the following requirements:
Zoning
Lot Area
Setback
Agricultural/ Rural
10 hectares (24,7 acres)
100 metres (328 feet) minimum
This application conforms to the requirements noted above (Attachment #4).
/ r,.
([J - cr/
I RECOMMENDATION
I
That Council approve the MacDonald/ Clark request for a kennel license,
Respectfully submitted,
f2~~f!JL-'
Ronald M. Kolbe, CBCO, AScT, MAA TO
Director of Building/Planning Development
c.A.O.
u~
J
DATE: MO-J\. >/)70 --/
I~ I
~PlHe~~~61- '
c.A.O. Comments:
FrTT fiC.:H \Y') E. tJT :# j
I
I
(y
U.J
z.~
~
en
I-
Q)
.......
Q)
~
o
o
CO
o
o
"I:t
o
o
o
"I:t
Co l' V. "
;;-- ,- . ..
f
~Otfice Df the Planner
Mel110
To: Ron Kolbe, Director of Building/Planning
From:Andria Leigh, Planner
Date: January 15, 2002
Re: Concession 2, Part of Lot 28 (Oro), Roll # 010-001-18300
The above noted property is zoned Agricultural/Rural (AIRU) in Zoning By-law 97-95.
This zoning does permit the use of the property for a kennel operation provided the
property is a minimum of 10 ha (24.7 acres) in size, According to the assessment
records this property is 33.71 ha (83,32 acres) in size and would therefore satisfy the
zoning requirements for a kennel.
Trusting this information is satisfactory,
Yours Truly,
~~ -t'l~
Andria Leigh, Hons.B.A.,MCIP,RPP
Township Planner
. Page 1
"';\1'..1'-"'.'''-..........,\..... cw...
, .
I I'1C
(fJ J ~-...J
SCHEDULE "Bit
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
APPLICATION FOR KENNEL LICENSE
This application is a:
New Application (v0 Renewal
Pure-Bred Kennel License (~) Boarding Kennel License (
POSTAL CODE:
Stormy N'jh+S (R~'(L 60lcleYl i<etv".evevSJ
K,'m bU' ~ MQc..J)O'1alct A",d Te.I"V{.Vlce. ClCir k
le'1-=1- FI'yd L.in~ } N c r '~'-1. R. R it 2.. S;hq"IyI3C<;j,l ON
LO L.- 2.1-0
NAME OF KENNEL:
APPLICANT:
MAILING ADDRESS:
TELEPHONE NUMBER:
(705) 72/- /05 S
home
S'a ."" e.
business
(If more than one registered owner with different address,
attach separate sheet)
Lega1 Description of Property on
which Kenne1 is to be operated:
Lot 2'(3
Con. 2..
P1an
Kenne1 wiJ.1 be operated by: (vi same as registered owner;
or
Name:
Address:
Postal Code:
Te1ephone:
(home)
(business)
If Owner is a Corporation:
Name of all Shareholders
Address
% of shares
ProfessionaJ. Affiliation of Owner (or operator)
Canadian Kennel Club: yes ( v( no () C.K.C. No. 01108028
Other (specify)
~r-~
DECLARATION
I hereby certify that I have knowledge of the particulars
contained in the foregoing statement, and I solemnly affirm
that the same are in every respect fully and truly stated to
the best of my knowledge and belief, as if made under and by
virtue of The Canada Evidence Act and I solemnly affirm that
I (we) have not been convicted under Section 446 of the
Criminal Code of Canada Pertaining to an~l cruelty,
Dated this the
" ...'"
day of J(:(t'\V{lf1
.{}A.
, ~ 2.002..
L lUa-c~Q .
~d1-
Applicant
Applicant
Boarding Kennel Applicants Only..
I,
, hereby certify on behalf of
~ \ 'roo
, a boarding kennel
establishment, that dogs kept on our premises and under our
watch and care are not being offered for sale.
Date
Signature
Note: Council has the right to refuse any kennel
application.
.::.;.. '" PleClse 110te rv~ eto ., of nave. Ctv/ ctdw1..1 ken.,d
I
bu.ddIVlJ. DIAl" dOjs live. wdh v!. '11 +he hov~e. and
Clre. 1Y.z.ti.+ed Cl!; Yt.lI"'lI.h'~ -h:tm; Ij M€.trlbe.....>, It yov
hav!. a ~h
ny ~I.(€S OvJs 0'- c...o,..c.O'V\s, plectse. phOV1e. (105.12'1- 105&).
- ,
#
OFFICE USE ONLY
Application received by:
(tkp'j? j}~!flr
Township Employee
Application for License recommended by:
1) Ontari~.C_~~t~
2) ~A'
Chief By-law nforcement Officer
3)
!hJO/{/4- Lt1&1J'
Planner
4)
j nJlt/) 11, ltIJ t .
Director of Building/Planning
Development
Application for Kennel License issued by:
Issuer
~ /-1
l-1
/ ,)1pJ1 II )U~
I
Date
J 1/i6Jc 1-
I
NJ~.
Date f
Date
J ;f1-J" 5 ~ z..
.
Date
_J ,#J. 11 )(j-!.
I
Date
Date
Note:
Upon Issuance a copy of the application form
shall be given to the applicant, along with a
copy of the Kennel By-law.
This license has been revoked by resolution of Council due
to the following reasons:
Resolution No.
Clerk
Date
Location of Kennels
Township of Oro-Medonte
/17/ /I"ff/?CIV(
6
'f ..::::J
~ XIV.../
~?\ XIII ..< ~
~~ ). XlAI
~ x~~~
I12v2,; ,,~,)I: A?t:KY
~ ~ r'S.' ...V ~[~ IX: x~
~\ ~'(~ ~~'" '" ":v >'-W >.-~ ~
II .x '( "J...~ "\ .G/\ 07/ ~ ~
0XV\? . ~ h Y ~~ * ~
~ ... S);'<;5. x )t''( '5 y),< .Y~
~..A~:;) '\ v
~~/I>""~ ~,YX A v
~~~~l/l 7' C'x::.>\. ~~ A, ),Y -
), ~~ ):.~j!!'). Xv~.A
;) ...--~>:;: ~'N'0~7/YA' XIII
) ~ /"\ ~ ~. \.
?< )or VI 1 y-)., /""'~~ 19< ~\.~ f:8:t
t~ Y~~ x~0( ~ J'
"Y': Y #1
, ~ VI' ?:;-.,/~./ ~./~
. v' ~~ ~~~ \~~~~ ~
~V'~>r /~~ ~?0; ~~~I(; ~
~~~~\:v ~~~'<;>J~
:i-~\->>~~ v,/~ 4
'~~I,~~~~X'>-~
~ ?;:Y \\t:-~' ~~ Ax... 'oj '~
~ 0 "(~ ~/J'( \~')
~ ~ c~.,. ~~ /~~
'A~ ;"':())~~I~W
~~~ ~~~~3~' 7
~h ).. AR~ ·
~ K/ ~'\./I:; v ~
~ (\ ~ ~'7 L#ke
ril- - ~ If SimcOe
'i-'-'--. > ~
~~
~!JI""
II
N
+
Owner's
Kennel
Address
#
Name
Name
1 Wild Wildmore 14268/69 SR
2 Edwards Cheynat 5161 Vasey Rd
3 Harvie Polruan 6415L4N
4 Lynn Larrylynn 5640 L5N
5 Gordon PrettyValley 5536 L5N
6 Therrien Shelaskan 5939 L8N
7 Morano Da Mar 11256 Hwy 12
8 Leblanc Snowmist 3990 L7N
9 Beny Beny 3956 L8N
10 Villeneuve Mon Ami 527 Warminster SR
11 Gillespie Bondell 3674 L8N
12 Pierce Windrift 5753 L8N
13 Clarke Hawthornes 1478 HVR
14 Kanis Liefhond 8996 Hwy 12
15 Kaplinski Arkbark 2097 L6N
16 Parry Royal Pets 2072 L3N
18 Thornton Silverstreem 5450 Hwy 11N
19 Reid Reid/Law 40 L13S
20 Leigh Oroleigh 311L11N
22 Phillips/Starr Hawkestone 623L10S
23 Smith Meadowlawn 951 L7S
25 Ramey Snowmist 767 Ridge Rd.
26 Bishop Orovale 336 L5N
27 Gadawski Bluenorth 340 L4N
28 Hudson Aunt Judy's 207 L3N
29 Tonge Rustic 8L3S
30 Swailes Leadaway 3750 L13N
31 Tuominen Blackpool 2607L2N
.~
;;,,0-1
'-Y i
tJ
.
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK
REPORT TO COUNCIL
REPORT NO.: ADM2002-13
PREPARED BY: M. Pennycook, Clerk
DATE: March 27, 2002
SUBJECT: Electrical Distribution
]
I BACKGROUND
At the Central Simcoe Mayors meeting of January 24, 2002, Mayor Jim Perri, City of
Barrie presented two resolutions of the City of Barrie with respect to Electrical
Distribution. The two resolutions and the supporting documentation are attached for
information.
r 1I-'~ w]
'ANALYSIS
The complexity surrounding the issues of Hydro One deregulation on May 1, 2002, as
well as those raised by the City of Barrie as a local electricity distribution utility, impelled
staff to request an opinion from the Township Solicitor. A summary of the Solicitor's
comments is attached.
I~__n ~l
'RECOMMENDATION
1. That this report be received for information.
C5J~\()~
~3f~
~ereas the financial integrity and stability of local electricity distribution utilities is of vital im;rt~ce : the
City of Barrie.
Whereas the financial integrity and stability of local electricity distribution utilities is put at risk as a result of'
LDC's current obligation to make 100% payment to the IMO in the event of a payment default of a retailer;
Therefore, be it resolved that the City of Barrie call upon the Province and the Ontario Energy Board and !
Independent Market Operator, to take steps prior to the opening of the competitive electricity market to ensure
that local electricity distribution utilities are held harmless for any uncollected electricity costs that arise as a
result of the payment default of a retailer.
Further that, that the appropriate Minister, local MPP and the Association of Municipalities of Ontario be so
advised. (File: E06)
.060 ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION
Whereas consumers need and deserve full information and knowledge regarding the workings of the competitive
electricity market and their rights and responsibilities in it, and
Whereas electricity retailers are currently engaged in highly aggressive sales campaigns targeting local electricity
consumers in communities across Ontario resulting in many consumers having entered into contracts without
understanding the nature of their actions, and
Whereas consumer confusion and complaints generated by aggressive sales campaigns and the opening of the
market unnecessarily increases customer service costs of local electricity utilities, the natural point of contract
local consumers turn to for assistance, and
Whereas local municipal representatives, as elected officials and/or utility shareholders have a strong interest in
ensuring consumers are educated and satisfied and that utility costs are not unnecessarily high.
Be it resolved that the City of Barrie call upon the Province to lead renewed efforts to ensure that:
a) consumers are fully educated and prepared for the opening of the competitive market, and;
b) electricity retailers employ honest, no-pressure sales practices with educated salespeople that do not lead
to unnecessary consumer confusion or added utility costs, and
c) grant to consumers that have entered into any contracts to date an opportunity to opt out of such contracts
during the 60 days prior to market opening without penalty and a cooling off period for any new contracts
to be signed thereafter allowing
d) consumers a chance to void such contracts should they choose to,
ler that the appropnate Minister, the local MPP and the Association of Municipalities be so advised, (File: E06)
.
~
~'
\"'I!
"
J
AIRD & BERLlS LLP
MEMORANDUM
TO: Chris Williams
FROM: Dennis M. O'Leary
DATE: February 13, 2002
RE: Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte
Electricity Distribution Issues
File #: Client #:
This memorandum is in response to the letter received from Marilyn Pennycook dated February 7,
2002, attaching two resolutions passed at the Central Simcoe Mayor's Meeting of January 24th, 2002.
We have been asked for our comments in respect of these resolutions and I respond to each
separately,
Electrical Distribution - Payment Default of a Retailer
Local electrical distribution companies ("LOC's") and their shareholders are understandably concemed
about the impact of an electricity retailer defaulting on payments owing to the LOC The resolution
which was passed essentially asks the Province, the Ontario Energy Board ("OES") and the
independent market operator ("IMO") to guarantee electricity retailers,
While there is no indication, to my knowledge, that the Province will agree to do this, the OEB has
approved rules which, as a condition to the licence issued to every retailer and distributor, must be
followed. These rules offer LDC's various non-payment risk mitigation options and security
arrangements between LOC's and retailers, These rules are set out in the Retail Settlement Code
("RSC") approved by the OEB, A copy is attached at Tab A.
Briefly, the RSC provides three means by which consumers can be billed, The LOC or retailer can be
solely responsible for all billing and collecting or these functions can be split and each would bill for that
portion of the amount owing within their responsibility, In all cases, where a retailer undertakes a billing
and collections function, it is required to make payment to the LOC regardless of whether or not the
retailer is paid by the consumer. Where a LOC undertakes all or a portion of the billing and collections
function, it is entitled to use whatever means are available at law to mitigate consumer non-payment
risk including threat or implementation of disconnection for non-payment of distribution charges in
accordance with the RSC,
\
I
I
\
\
It is noteworthy that the RSC is silent as to the ability by either the retailer or LOC to impose an amount
and type of security requirement on a consumer where the~nsumer has entered into a retail contract.
By comparison, in situations where a consumer remains on the standard ~upply service and does not
receive power under an agreement with an electricity retailer, the LOC has the option of imposing an
amount and type of security requirement on a consumer depending upon the distributor's assessment
of the consumer's likely risk of non-payment.
The explanation for this apparent difference probably is the result of Chapter 8 of the RSC which gives
a distributor the option of entering into security arrangements with each retailer to protect against the
risk of payment default by the retailer. Terms of these arrangements must be set out in the service
- 2 -
agreement between the distributor and the retailer, The amount and type of security required may vary
depending upon a distributor's estimate of the magnitude of exposure, however, this assessment must
be completed in accordance with the provisions of Section 8.1 of the RSC and the credit worthiness of
the retailer.
Accordingly, options appear available to an LOC which, if properly implemented, should substantially if
not totally mitigate against the risk of non-payment by a retailer.
I attach at Tab B a copy of Appendix C to the RSC which is the service agreement approved by the
OEB. LOC's and retailers must execute this agreement and it may not be waived, altered, amended or
modified except as provided in the agreement or as authorized by the OEB, Article 3 and Appendix B
to this agreement deal with security arrangements between an LOC and a retailer. You will note from
Appendix B that the Board is presently consulting on proposed amendments to Chapter 8 of the RSC
which will affect the contents of the service agreement. The bottom line, therefore, is that while options
and mechanisms will likely be in place which will offer a measure of protection to LOC's, the precise
methodology has not yet been settled.
I also attach at Tab C a copy of the OEB's bulletin dated February 11, 2002. You will note from the 3rd
paragraph that the OEB is aware of advice being given to LOC's "against signing service agreements
until the IMO confirms that utilities will not be held accountable for the immediate payment of potentially
uncollectible electricity costs related to retailer contracts". As can be seen from the balance of the
bulletin, the OEB is not very sympathetic to these concerns warning distributors that if service
agreements are not signed in accordance with the market readiness timetable, they may face
administrative penalties, I interpret this to mean that the OEB believes there are adequate provisions in
the RSC and the service agreement to protect LOC's in the event of non-payment by a retailer,
Electrical Distribution
I am aware that complaints have been made about the sales campaigns undertaken by some electricity
retailers in parts of the province. Indeed, these complaints probably resulted in the November 5th, 2001
press release issued by the OEB, a copy of which I attach at Tab O. This press release alludes to
relevant provisions in the Electricity Retailer Code of Conduct ("ERCC"), It is a condition of the licence
issued to every retailer that they comply with the ERCC, I attach a copy of the ERCC at Tab E.
You will note that the ERCC contains fair marketing practice requirements under Section 2,1, Section
2.5 requires that offers made by retailers contain information specified in the Code and that the contract
which a consumer ultimately executes be consistent with the offer, Section 2,6 limits the duration of
any contract to no more than 5 years and gives every small consumers10 days following the execution
of a contract to rescind the agreement.
The resolution passed calls upon the Province to lead renewed efforts to ensure that:
(a) consumers are fully educated and prepared for market opening;
(b) electricity retailers employ honest, educated salespeople who do not exercise pressure sales
tactics;
(c) consumers who have executed contracts to date are afforded an opportunity to opt out during
the 60 days prior to market opening and a cooling off period is provided in respect of new
contracts signed hereafter, allowing consumers a chance to void such contracts,
The ERCC deals with (b) and part of (c) above by requiring retailers to exercise fair marketing practices
. and by giving small consumers a 10 day cooling off period following execution of a contract to rescind
the agreement. While the ERCC specifically requires a retailer to provide timely, accurate, verifiable
\'
l
l
t
~,.
,
i-
t
t
t
I
t,
t
I:
a
t
I
&
/ :;-
5"', I ',-
3 {p>.-{ f .'
. - J
and truthful comparisons, there is little else which will further educate and ready the small consum~ for
market opening. There is no provision allowing consumers to rescind executed contracts subsequent
to the expiry of the 10 day cooling off period. Absent specific language in a statute or regulation giving
consumers the right, contracts entered into that are in conformance with the ERCC are legally
enforceable, This being said, I have examined several earlier drafts of retail contracts and in some
instances, it was my view that the contract did not fully comply with the ERCC and could be the subject
of complaint or challenge,
Finally, it should be noted that many of the proWsions which relate to the minimum requirements in
offers and contracts relate only to residential or small business consumers who are defined as
consumers who annually use less than 150,000 kilowatts of electricity, Larger consumers should,
therefore, be that much more careful considering the terms of an electricity retailer's offer.
::ODMA\PCDOCS\DOCS\1149111\1
REPORT
10,' r
'DEPT, REPORT TO: Council PREPARED BY:
#ES2002-13 Keith Mathieson
SUBJECT & FILE #: DEPARTMENT:
COUNCIL:
Request for Streetlights - Public Works
Lakeshore Road East from
C,OFW. Line 5 to Line 7
MOTION #: DATE:
DATE: March 22, 2002
At a deputation to Council and through correspondence received in the fall of 2001 from residents of
Lakeshore Road East between Line 5 and Line 7, several concerns were presented to Council with
respect to this section of roadway, one of which was the request for streetlighting,
In conversation with residents regarding their request for streetlighting on Lakeshore Road, it was not
the intent of this request to have streetlighting installed every sixty (60) metres, as per the Township
standard, in new development. From this conversation, curves have been identified in the road and
at intersections onto Lakeshore Road East to determine the number of lights required along the
Lakeshore as intended by the residents' request.
This section of Lakeshore Road East is three (3) kilo metres in length, with a posted speed limit of 50
km/h, Eight curves and four intersections have been identified that would address the residents'
concerns for streetlighting, The financial impact to install these proposed streetlights would be
$7,800.00 ($650,00 per light x 12), upon approval of Hydro One and assuming there will be no
additional upgrades required by Hydro One.
The annual operating and maintenance costs for the twelve (12) lights would be approximately
$950,00 per year. Section 2 of the Township's "Policy for Streetlight Charges and Installation of New
Streetlights" identifies that roadways classified as Class I, II or III requiring streetlighting, would be a
benefit to the general public, and the capital and operating costs for streetlighting shall be placed on
the general tax levy as approved by Council. Although this section of Lakeshore Road East does not
meet the minimum "average annual daily traffic" (AADT) count for a Class III roadway, it is the opinion
of the Director of Engineering and Environmental Services that the Lakeshore is used by more than
local traffic to access Lake Simcoe and public parks. Therefore, this road should be considered a
. roadway benefiting the general public and the capital and operating costs of these streetlights would
be accountable for on the general tax levy.
- {Ot ~ <f
For Council's information and future consideration, using the same criteria as utilized between the 5th
Line and ih Line along Lakeshore Road, it has been identified that for the balance of Lakeshore
Road from the ih Line, up to and including Moon Point Road (15,8 km), seventy-eight (78)
streetlights would be required if future requests were received.
Mrs, Franchetto has been notified that Council will be dealing with this matter at the Committee of the
Whole Meeting to be held on March 27, 2002,
1. THAT the request for streetlights on Lakeshore Road East between Line 5 and Line 7 be denied.
2. THAT Mr. and Mrs, Franchetto be notified of Council's decision.
3, THAT Council receives and adopts this report.
RMC~UIIY submitted,
~
Keith Mathieson
~\\u~
~ ,
.
. .' (.'
. ~ ~#Yh
POLICY FOR STREETLIGHT CHARGES AND INSTALLATION OF NEW fVt.
STREETLIGHTS WITHIN THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
1. THAT all lots within a Plan of Subdivision serviced with streetlights be charged a special
area rate, as per Section 210.59 of-the Municipal Act, for the operation and maintenance
of the streetlights, as approved by Council;
2. THA T installation of streetlights to illuminate intersections of roads or waJkways that,
connect to a Class I, II or ill roadway, as per Ministry of Transportation Classification of
Highways (FIG. I), should be considered as a benefit to the general public. Both Capital
and Operating Costs shall be placed on the General Tax Levy, as approved by Council;
3, THA T a request for new or additional streetlighting be presented to Council, in writing,
for consideration;
4. THAT if additional lighting is requested within an existing area serviced with
streetlighting, and deemed necessary by the Manager of Public Works and approved by
Council, new streetlights or light would be installed and paid for from the Systems
Reserve Fund. The maximum allowable spacing of streetlights shall be as per Township
Standard 6.4 - Streetlighting - Township of Oro-Medonte Engineering Standards and
Drawings - By-Law No. 95-104;
5, THAT a request received by Council, in writing, for streetlighting in an area not
presently serviced by streetlighting, Council gives consideration as follows:
(A)( i) THA T requests on an arterial road with intersecting roads to residential or industrial
development will be considered a benefit to all persons on the arterial road and persons
on intersecting roads within the developed area (FIG.IT); and
{ii) THA T all persons within the area will be notified, in writing, stating all proposed Capital
and Operating Costs that will be charged to each lot owner, along with notification of
date and time for Council deliberation.
(B)( i) THA T requests on an individual street with no intersecting roads to residential or
industrial development will be considered a benefit to only the persons on the individual
street (FIG. ill); and
(ii) THAT all persons on the street will be notified, in writing, stating all proposed
Capital. and Operating Costs that will be charged to each lot owner, along with
notification of date and time for Council deliberation.
I
.
~.-,. \
r2.\
/1
A. ver:a.ge j\n1lUal Daily posted at s~ s:peed LUnit ~01l1ettd l'"' n-)
lraffic (nu,tD.be1' of
1J).otot vehicles) 100 90 80 10 60 50 40
20.,000 of tnote 1 1 1 2. 2 2 2
15.,000 - 19,999 1 1 1 2. 2 2 2
12.,000 - 14,999 1 1 1 2 2 3 3
10.,000 - 11.,999 1 1 2 2 3 3 3
8.,000 - 9,999 1 1 2 3 3 3 3
6.,000 - 1.,999 . 1 2 2 3 3 3 3
5.,000 - 5.,999 1 2 2 3 3 3 3
4,000 - 4,999 1 2 3 3 3 3 4
3.,000 - 3,999 1 2 3 3 3 4 4
2,000 - 2,999 1 2 3 3 4 4 4
1,000 - 1.,999 1 3 3 ~. 3 4 4 5
500 - 999 1 3 4 4 4 4 5
200 - 499 1 3 4 4 5 5 5
50 - \99 1 3 4 5 5 5 5
0_49 1 3 6 6 6 6 6
\ \
"fABLE
CLASSif1CA L10~ 01' maaW A'lS
. -
/'
MAt"
.
"'-.
~---
\ \
( r\
v
-----
",
i;
..
'i:
....
--
--~---_._-
----
~~7:ii;~~~
___~":"'~..i,~';"';
-
"
"
Au... ~LE w' 'f\.t ,,.J
WC\.M...O
A~
~\~
-
---
--
i
,
..
..
..!:.~
~~~-r:
---
----
.-------------
---
---. -
-
" f'
--U
--:-::Ef
- .,...
"'!
"
---
!* ,:~- ....-
-~.'~~
~L~ - ' ..~'~,:~ _ __ _ _
- --- ---
---!O.
- ,1;1-
=. .,::
.. >
,.0:.-
--...
o
i
L
Simcoe
A ~Tr=-e i r:;.\-
(')
~ot'\C
@ 1996 SimCM County Lana Il'1formation N<<wont Coooetorive
'.!.t.mON TIj P1!:j{)~ <::r
.. ::>E~-
.....,:.-...;,.......
_' :,:,;,;~,"::3:=:::':':'.:!~:""
_2~/--
-':::::;---
_.-~;;
...- -.. - - - - .- - ::-",:,"";;;'-:::".
~-:.--'
. ::- .;::;;~ 1-/ !
.' .:':::-' ..i ~.
': ,'.;'-" I' I
.- t; .
!
, i
. I
. I
! ~ ;
i ; ,
.i \'
~~I !,_
J '
-!j 1&'-:
I: II
tr I.
!
j
i
!
.
... il!
;: :...-----
~Gt'. *3
:_~.
,
...
: '--
.. -..... ~, !
i
211 . :117_
. '~
5 . !
! ~ ;
.. . ,
.
i
..
-_.
1-
, .
--
..::t::".JDIUIOu~ S~
~ I\Jl.. '-i P5::1Pc.e. J:.~
'"1"'\+i So ~ c....JQU-LQ
Lake B~,t:I\
SiIIlcoe
-.-.. .
._-
/
mfW m O&:'af!t'P . C"~ 'r"f17 ~ OAt;( r:r)Fi' Ul.lrr~T70MS ;i5' TO use..
~ 1996 Sif/'lC08 County Land Irrformarion ~ ~
)
))
I-
e;-
~
REPORT
1b~1
'DEPT. REPORT TO: Council PREPARED BY:
#ES2002-14 Keith Mathieson
SUBJECT & FILE #: DEPARTMENT:
COUNCIL:
Request by the Moonstone Public Works
Water System Corporation
C. OF W. to Connect to the Existing
Robincrest Water System in
MOTION #: the Village of Moonstone DATE:
DATE: March 22, 2002
The Moonstone Water System Corporation is a privately operated water system serving 25 users in
the Village of Moonstone, primarily located on the north side of County Road #19.
The Ministry of the Environment has issued an order requiring the Moonstone Water System
Corporation to comply with the Ontario Drinking Water Regulations (Regulation #459/00), The
upgrades that are required for this private system would be extremely expensive, as would annual
operating costs for twenty-five (25) units. The Moonstone Water System Corporation has retained
Mr. Greg Gemmeil of R. G, Robinson and Associates Ltd" to prepare a proposal on their behalf to
connect to the existing Robincrest water system owned and operated by the Township, The request
and proposal is attached for Council's perusal.
Along with the four (4) required upgrades identified in R. G, Robinson's letter dated February 13,
2002, it is recommended that the Township also require the Moonstone Water System Corporation to
provide the following information at their cost:
.:. Confirmation that the existing two (2) wells have the capacity to supply water to the eighty (80)
homes currently on the Robincrest system, the proposed ninety (90) homes in the Bachly
subdivision, and the twenty five (25) homes on the private Moonstone system,
.:. "As built" drawings showing the existing private system.
.:. Be provided with the names and addresses of the individuals connected to the private system,
.:. Blow-offs be installed at each end of the private system,
.:. Provide the Township with a letter relieving the municipality of any financial or legal obligations
that may arise from the pending order that has been issued by the Ministry of the Environment.
fb-cr
1, THAT Council receives and adopts this report.
2, THAT staff prepares, for Council's consideration, a Memorandum of Understanding between the
Moonstone Water System Corporation and the Township of Oro-Medonte, with a view to
assumption by the Township of the underground piping of the Moonstone system.
~ submitted,
Keith Mathieson
CP~~
~ .\r;J1
~y\
~~
.
~~
CONSULTING
ENGINEERS
AND
PLANNERS
-s
RG ROBINSON
AND ASSOCIATES (BARRIE) LTD
1fr3
K. Mathesion;, " .
Director Engmeering and
Environmental Services
.. Township of Oro-Medonte
P.O. Box 100, RR #1
Oro Station, ON LOL 2XO
t":;;.~
;--.~.,. ,"..'
;-"--"
:f';:'"""":-.:;.."" -
t~~1
lb~"
.~~."
\,.~;;1.
V,., '?"
\.Cf7.;' "-
Dear Sir:
~~~,
"",,, " ,',,'.-,.>':.
RE: Moonstone w~1-~~~}jf;Corporation
File No: 866..., 01166..., 10
Request for Township to Adopt Existinf! System
Please be advised that we have been retained by the Moonstone Water System Corporation to
comply with the a Provincial Officer Order.
This order required the Moonstone Water System Corporation to take action such that that, in
accordance with The Ontario Drinking Water Regulation (Reg459100)and Section 34 of the
Ontario. Water Resources Act, disinfection is provided and that the system is operated by a
certified Operator.
We note. that the there arecUITentlY tWo. systems in Moonstone, one operated, by the TQwnship
(Medonte Hills) and the private> system referenced above. The Moonstone Water. System
Corporation hereby . requests 'that the Township., allow the connection ,of, the existing , pipe
netwotk to the Township supply and distribution system and further that the Township accepts
the existing. pipe network. It is proposed that the existing supply be disconnected' from the
existing system.
If the above request is satisfactory to the Township the Water System Corporation will agree to
following;
· The Moonstone 'Water System CQrporation will obtain a Certifi,cate of Approval for,the
existing pipe network, including the payment of the appropriate fees.
· The Moonstone Water System Corporation will provide any necessary upgrades required by
the MOE to obtain the Certi:ficateofApproval.
. The Moonstone Water System CQrporation will provide;
· the connectionto,the existing system;
. disconnection of the existing well, ifrequired.
· The Individual Home owners will provide:
. a corporation stop installed at the property tme for each connection;
· a watermeterclwinspection fees to the Township.
10 High Street, Suite 200, Barrie,OntarioL4N lWl (705) l21,9222 Fax (705) 734"()764 engplan@rgra.on;ca
~.
'" '
1b/~
We note that this proposal will result in approximately 25 additional dients to the Township
water system. These additional clients will increase revenue for the Township by
approximately $8,625.00/ year. We feel this proposal results in a win-win situation for both the
Township and the residents currently being serviced by the Mocnstone Water System
COIporation.
We trust the above is satisfactory explanation of our request and look-forWard to your response
regarding same.
RespectfullyS'Uoriiitt.ed,
.
G02
File No: 866-01166-10
Copy:
M; Finnan
M. Kelly
- R.G. Robinson and Associates
- Moonstone Water System COIporation
, "
REPORT
fCY I
D'EPT. REPORT TO: Council PREPARED BY:
#ES2002-05 Keith Mathieson
SUBJECT & FILE #: DEPARTMENT:
COUNCIL:
Ms. Lynda Collins - Public Works
Horseshoe Valley - Request
C. OF W. for Rebate of Front-Loading
Washing Machines
MOTION #: DA TE:
DATE: March 22, 2002
At the present time, the City of Barrie and the City of Orillia offer their residents a rebate of $140,00
towards the purchase of a front-loading washing machine, which are estimated to use 40% less
water. Both cities are proposing to lower the amount of the rebate in 2002 to $100.00 to $125,00 per
unit.
Both cities are for the most part, fully serviced with municipal water and sewers. Lowering of water
consumption is an operational cost benefit, as well as a conservation benefit to the cities,
Approximately 1-2% of the homeowners in each city takes advantage of the front-loading washing
machine rebate annually (between 500 and 600 homes per year ($70,000,00) in the City of Barrie
and between 200 and 300 homes per year ($28,000.00) in the City of Orillia).
The City of Barrie funds their rebate from the sewer reserve, while the City of Orillia uses its water
reserve to fund their rebate projects. Both cities, and some energy suppliers, have been involved
with water conservation programs that include the installation of low-flow toilets, showerheads, and
aerators for bathroom and kitchen taps. Under the Building Code, all new homes built since 1990 are
required to install low-flow toilets, which save approximately three (3) gallons of water per flush,
Attached for Council's perusal, is information received by Council at the Regular Committee of the
Whole Meeting held on January 9,2002 from the Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority strongly
encouraging residents and businesses to conserve water. With the present low water conditions and
the possibility that similar conditions could prevail for the next number of years, the Township of Oro-
Medonte should consider a water conservation program that would be available to residents within
the Township.
Upon in~estiga~iOn of the water consumption of household items and the savings that can be .../-r~ 0
achieved through the installation of water conservation products, installing low-low toilets would result
in a greater conservation of water by individual homeowners,
The Township of Oro-Medonte rebate program would allow for a $50.00 rebate per low-flow toilet, to
a maximum of two (2) per household, for homes built within the Township prior to 1990.
RECOMME
1. THAT Council receives and adopts this report,
2, THAT Council, during the 2002 Budget deliberations, considers a rebate program for the
installation of low-flow toilets, of $50.00 per low-flow toilet, to a maximum of two (2) per
household, for homes built within the Township of Oro-Medonte prior to 1990, on a first come, first
serve basis until the allocated amount of $5,000,00 approved by Council has been paid out.
3. THAT an annual report be prepared for Council with respect to the financial impact of the rebate
program.
4. THAT Ms, Lynda Collins be notified of Council's decision,
;E: submitted,
Keith Mathieson
06 tuOl. ,Q 0-::-- ( <A 0
~(l,ubL~.k~ \ ~,
.___ Y\5J ~,\s-€; ~t6
~6J-~ k~ 1
~5f w-1-~s~cA)~
fS-PJ-, ~l ;Vv . .
-- 1I7;G0 ~L(j-YY'
U ,-----
cr~
\o~
~ \Y~ \
..
7- 20(
lit',
. .
~
Region
ictiOn tQ
ervicesv)
.
3 Utopia
a pasSN
.
parcel Ie
narea.. 1 .
~.on.ca
~ purpose
srrent 100
roperties
IQ causes
IUonS abOl
ldings
NVCA ha
'Creek's'i
---- - .. - -- - ----
.,. . . _...~.
-r...,.""Y v.nV-uu;:,UV1'J.r.
~VVl;,fVVI;,
,
. .
C"
i" ,.
:0/ /1
....,'.
...,,'
NVCA Highlights October/November
Page 2
.
management issues such as water quality and quantity providing baseline data as well as to identify the naturel .
heritage system, The 'public had an opportunity to revie<.v the'study on November 22 at an open house.
Credit Valley Conservation (CVe) has completed 5 years of scientific researching containing the state of surface am
groundwater in the Credit watershed and asking the province to consult with municipal, conservation authority and
other water management experts to agree on the components of a Provincial Water Management Strategy. The
need for development of a Provincial Water Policy involving the public, conservation authorities and municipalities
has been repeatedly identified at the Wakerton Inquiry, Smart Growth and Oak Ridges Moraine consultations. The
Strategy would set out the context for a comprehensive Provincial-Water Policy and Programs. Water -quality and
quantity management may be the most important issue we address as without sufficient and safe water there in no
health. education. quality of life or economic growth.
Conservation Authorities Continue to Battle Low Water Conditions Across Ontario
Despite recent rains, Conservation Authorities in Ontario strongly encourage residents and businesses to continue t.
conserve water. The present low water conditions, coupled with similar droughts over the past three years, could
continue to have an impact next summer across the province's watershed depending on the type of winter Ontario
experiences. SnoVllfall conditions this winter will be very important in determining whether the drought conditions
continues in 2002, With 3 of the last 4 years experiencing below average rainfall, it will take more than 1 year of
above average-precipitation to bring water levels. and especially groundwater back to where they were before the
pre-drought status, The NVCA along with other authorities across the province play a very important role in
assessing low water conditions, We provide water supply information and then interpret it along with other water
manager partners. The NVCA is designated as the lead agency and are responsible for pulling together local Water
Response Teams (WRTs) across the watershed, When declaring low water conditions, the Water Response Teams
rely primarily on pr~cipitation and stream flow figures collected on a regular basis throughout the watershed. The
next WRT meeting is set for December 12, 2001.
Corporate Communications - Barbara MacKen2.ie-Wynia, (ext. 227)
bmackenzie-wvnia@nvca.on.ca
New Technology
A new data projector for power point presentations has been purchased. Starting in 2002, staff will initiate a proactiv
speaking engagement program to municipalities. watershed groups and businesses.
Tiffin Centre for Conservation Environmental Education Programs to be Contracted Out
Fred Tustin, Director of Beyond the Honzon Outdoor Adventures has submitted a proposal to deliver environmental
eduC<ltion programs through the Tiffin Centre for Conservation,
Bonwick Leads Great Lakes Initiative.
Paul Bonwick, MP Simcoe-Grey, expressed his unequivocal support during National Uberal Caucus on November 2
for the Conservation Ontario's proposals, the Fish Habitat Restoration Endowment Fund and the Healthy Great
Uai<~s Program. Bonwick stated that both programs would have enormous benefits to not only the riding of Simcoe
Grey but also all ridings that rely on upon the Great Lakes. "Water is our greatest resource. It is imperative that this
resource be protected,. said Bonwick. .Conservation Ontario, which is the umbrella organization for conservation
authorities in the province have' over 50 years experience in helping to preserve and protect this resource.
AuthOrities like the Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority and Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority, in
my riding, have been successfully delivering the programs necessary to keep our natural resources healthy. These
t'MJ programs are a natural and necessary extension for Conservation Ontario,. said Bonwick. Mr. Bonwick further-
stated .so much of our livelihood in Southern and Central Ontario relies upon the health d the Great Lakes. My rimr
is a prime example. It's located on the south tip of Georgian Bay. tt is our primary water. source - its tributaries are
important to our agriculture, recreation and tourism. Canada's Environment Commissioner has addressed the neec
for a bigger federal government role in protecting our Great Lakes. This request for funding from Conservation
Ontario is the prime opportunity for our government to meet that need:
Local Girt Wir,s Regional Conservation Award
Hillary Spek, of Midhurst Is this year's recipient of the Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Foundation's Evelyn A
Smith-Cynthia1.uhowy Conservation Award. Arst awarded in 1988, the scholarship recognizes students who are
pursuing uniVersity or coIlege-leve! studies which will further conservation ideals, Hillary, a recent graduate from
Barrie Collegiate, is in the Bachelor of Public Affairs and Policy Management program at Carleton University in
Ottawa, She is also a parliamentary volunteer in the West block of Parliament Hillary hopes to specialize in
intemational affairs and bring Canada's water management expertise to the world.
REPORT
10L-I
DEPT. REPORT TO: Council PREPARED BY:
#ES2002-15 Keith Mathieson
SUBJECT & FILE #: DEPARTMENT:
COUNCIL:
Annual Performance Report - Public Works
Canterbury Water Supply
C.OFW. and Treatment for 2001
MOTION #: DATE:
DATE: March 20, 2002
The Township has received the new Certificates of Approval (C. of A.'s) issued by the Ministry of the
Environment for all the water systems, Section 4 of the C, of A., Compliance Report, requires a
written report detailing that compliance with all terms and conditions of the approval be completed
annually, This Report is to be signed by a person designated by Council of the municipality that owns
the works and a resolution is to be presented to Council that the compliance report has been
received.
This first Compliance Report is due by March 31,2003,
Attached is Canterbury's Annual Performance Report for 2001, which was submitted to the Ministry of
the Environment. This Report was structured to comply with next year's Compliance Report and is
being made available to Council for information and confirmation that Ontario Regulation #459/00 is
being complied with by the Township of Oro-Medonte,
1. THAT Council designates the Director of Engineering and Environmental Services as the signing
authority for the Compliance Report,
2. THAT the Annual Performance Report for Canterbury Water Supply and Treatment 2001 be
received for information.
3. THAT Council receives and adopts this report.
Keith Mathieson
1 c/ )- 2....
C.A.O, COMMENTS:
"to:
DATE:
C.A.O.:
DEPT. HEAD:
f ~ J ~
THE CORPORATION OF THE
TOWN~llIP
cg/V-Of~~
148 Line 7 S.. Box 100
Oro, Ontario LOL 2XO
Phone (705) 487-2171
Fax (705) 487-0133
www.township.oro-medonte.on.ca
March 8, 2002
Ministry of the Environment
54 Cedar Pointe Drive
Unit #1203
BARRIE, Ontario
L4N 5R7
Re: Canterbury Water Supply and Treatment
Annual Performance Report for 2001
Dear Sir:
Permit to Take Water Renewal #92-P-3028 for Well #'s 1 and 2 was issued to the
Township of Oro-Medonte on December 18, 2001, expiring on December 15, 2011,
permitting a combined 104 m3 withdrawal per day.
The Canterbury water system supplies 17 homes with water.
WATER QUANTITY
Schedules have been attached showing the "average daily flow" per month and the
"maximum daily flow" per month for the Canterbury system. At no time during 2001 did
the "maximum daily flow" exceed the Permit to Take Water.
WATER QUALITY
Bacteriological samples were taken weekly by Township operators and submitted to the
Central Ontario Analytical Laboratory in Orillia, Two hundred and forty-two (242)
samples were tested for "total coliforms" and "fecal coliforms" in 2001. Seven (7) test
results during the year had reportable counts of "total coliforms", MOEE Spills Action
Centre and the Simcoe County District Health Unit were notified and resamples were
taken. A "Boil Water Advisory" was posted on September 19, 2001 and was rescinded
by the Simcoe County District Health Unit on September 25, 2001. No further actions
were required.
. , ./2
7 q )- ~
Page Two
Letter to M.O.E.
Re: Canterbury - Annual Performance Report for 2001
March 8, 2002
To ensure that the free chlorine residual was maintained above 0.2 mglL in the
distribution system, and a free chlorine residual was available in the distribution system,
12% Sodium Hypochlorite was pumped into the system. A total of 50 litres of 12%
Sodium Hypochlorite was used in the Canterbury system in 2001.
Daily tests for free chlorine in the treatment plant and in the distribution system were
performed by Township operators using a "Hack Pocket Colorimeter",
Daily tests for turbidity were performed by Township operators using a "Hack Pocket
Turbidity Meter",
Quarterly water quality analyses sampling was performed by Geospec Engineering Ltd.
in order to satisfy testing parameters for treated water as per Regulation #459/00.
Samples were forwarded to Lakefield Research Limited for chemical testing.
The chemical results did not reveal any health related, reportable exceedences during
2001, Non health related, elevated hardness values were detected above operational
guidelines of 80 to 100 mg/L in all quarterly analyses, ranging from 159 mg/L to 172
mg/L.
Mr. Fred MacGregor, Environmental Foreman of the Township of Oro-Medonte,
performed a calibration test on the existing water meter on June 11, 2001 and it was
calibrated at ,55%, which is well within Ministry of Environment guidelines,
If you require any further information with regards to the Canterbury water system,
please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at (705) 487-6499.
Sincerely,
F ORO-MEDONTE
Keith Mathieson, C.R.S,\.
Director of Engineering and Environmental Services
KM/ps
Attachments
CANTERBURY PUMP HOUSE - PAGE 1
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max. DIy, Flow (cu.m)
January
1 8310
2 8320 10
3 8328 8
4 8338 10
5 8347 9
6 8356 9
7 8367 11
8 8380 13
9 8388 8
10 8396 8
11 8405 9
12 8413 8
13 8421 8
14 8433 12
15 8445 12
16 8454 9
17 8464 10
18 8473 9
19 8481 8
20 8490 9
21 8501 11
22 8512 11
23 8520 8
24 8532 12
25 8537 5
26 8547 10
27 8556 9
28 8565 9
29 8579 14 Maximum Daily Flow I
30 8586 7
31 8595 9
Average Daily Flow 10
I cf J - .::::;
/
CANTERBURY PUMPHOUSE - PAGE 2
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max. Diy. Flow (cu.m)
31-Jan-01 8595 9
February
1 8602 7
2 8610 8
3 8617 7
4 8625 8
5 8638 13 Maximum Daily Flow 1
6 8647 9
7 8656 9
8 8667 11
9 8674 7
10 8682 8
11 8694 12
12 8703 9
13 8710 7
14 8718 8
15 8726 8
16 8734 8
17 8745 11
18 8755 10
19 8764 9
20 8775 11
21 8781 6
22 8789 8
23 8797 8
24 8807 10
25 8815 8
26 8827 12
27 8835 8
28 8842 7
Average Daily Flow 9
\
7c4 )- ~
CANTERBURY PUMPHOUSE - PAGE 3
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max. Diy, Flow (cu.m)
28-Feb-01 8842 7
March
1 8849 7
2 8856 7
3 8865 9
4 8876 11
5 8887 11
6 8894 7
7 8909 15
8 8914 5
9 8919 5
10 8927 8
11 8936 9
12 8947 11
13 8956 9
14 8964 8
15 8971 7
16 8978 7
17 8987 9
18 8996 9
19 9008 12
20 9017 9
21 9029 12
22 9040 11
23 9054 14
24 9066 12
25 9080 14
26 9096 16 Maximum Daily Flow 1
27 9108 12
28 9121 13
29 9134 13
30 9145 11
31 9156 11
Average Daily Flow 10
/ct)- (
CANTERBURYPUMPHOUSE-PAGE4
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max, Diy, Flow (cu.m)
31-Mar-01 9156 11
April
1 9170 14
2 9188 18
3 9199 11
4 9209 10
5 9222 13
6 9235 13
7 9246 11
8 9257 11
9 9270 13
10 9289 19
11 9302 13
12 9318 16
13 9326 8
14 9347 21 Maximum Daily Flow I
15 9359 12
16 9372 13
17 9391 19
18 9403 12
19 9414 11
20 9428 14
21 9439 11
22 9451 12
23 9472 21
24 9482 10
25 9496 14
26 9509 13
27 9521 12
28 9530 9
29 9545 15
30 9555 10
Average Daily Flow 13
1~)-8
CANTERBURY PUMPHOUSE - PAGE 5
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max, Diy, Flow (cu,m)
30-Apr-01 9555 10
May
1 9563 8
2 9574 11
3 9585 11
4 9593 8
5 9601 8
6 9611 10
7 9628 17 Maximum Daily Flow 1
8 9638 10
9 9651 13
10 9659 8
11 9666 7
12 9674 8
13 9685 11
14 9693 8
15 9702 9
16 9713 11
17 9726 13
18 9734 8
19 9744 10
20 9757 13
21 9769 12
22 9781 12
23 9789 8
24 9795 6
25 9806 11
26 9814 8
27 9826 12
28 9834 8
29 9844 10
30 9853 9
31 9864 11
Average Daily Flow 10
I 't ) - 7
CANTERBURY PUMP HOUSE - PAGE 6
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max, Diy, Flow (cu,m)
31-May-01 9864 11
June
1 9871 7
2 9878 7
3 9885 7
4 9899 14
5 9906 7
6 9916 10
7 9925 g
8 9933 8
9 9952 19
10 9964 12
11 9973 9
12 9988 15
13 9997 9
14 10008 11
15 10024 16
16 10036 12
17 10055 19
18 10078 23 Maximum Daily Flow I
19 10089 11
20 10099 10
21 10113 14
22 10128 15
23 10136 8
24 10147 11
25 10167 20
26 10176 9
27 10191 15
28 10214 23
29 10227 13
30 10240 13
Average Daily Flow 13
7 c1 ) ~ )0
CANTERBURY PUMPHOUSE-PAGE 7
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max. Diy, Flow (cu,m)
30-Jun-01 10240 13
July
1 10251 11
2 10261 10
3 10277 16
4 10286 9
5 10294 8
6 10305 11
7 10322 17
8 10334 12
9 10353 19
10 10370 17
11 10384 14
12 10394 10
13 10435 41 Maximum Daily Flow 1
14 10453 18
15 10471 18
16 10489 18
17 10509 20
18 10518 9
19 10532 14
20 10567 35
21 10583 16
22 10599 16
23 10617 18
24 10638 21
25 10649 11
26 10672 23
27 10695 23
28 10718 23
29 10741 23
30 10764 23
31 10775 11
Average Daily Flow 17
tCf )'//
. CANTERBURY PUMPHOUSE - PAGE 8
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max, Diy. Flow (cu.m)
31-Jul-01 10775 11
August
1 10791 16
2 10815 24
3 10842 27
4 10862 20
5 10882 20
6 10903 21
7 10938 35 Maximum Daily Flow I
8 10958 20
9 10988 30
10 11008 20
11 11031 23
12 11048 17
13 11073 25
14 11088 15
15 11109 21
16 11132 23
17 11141 9
18 11156 15
19 11170 14
20 11183 13
21 11192 9
22 11207 15
23 11225 18
24 11238 13
25 11253 15
26 11263 10
27 11276 13
28 11285 9
29 11293 8
30 11303 10
31 11314 11
Average Daily Flow 17
701)-\2...
Icf )'I~
CANTERBURYPUMPHOUSE-PAGE9
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max. DIy, Flow (cu.m)
31-Aug-01 11314 11
September
1 11325 11
2 11345 20
3 11359 14
4 11377 18
5 11387 10
6 11396 9
7 11406 10
8 11415 9
9 11436 21 Maximum Daily Flow I
10 11452 16
11 11460 8
12 11469 9
13 11479 10
14 11488 9
15 11497 9
16 11507 10
17 11523 16
18 11533 10
19 11554 21
20 11564 10
21 11581 17
22 11601 20
23 11613 12
24 11622 9
25 11635 13
26 11642 7
27 11653 11
28 11666 13
29 11679 13
30 11691 12
Average Daily Flow 13
CANTERBURY PUMPHOUSE - PAGE 10
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max. Diy. Flow (cu,m)
30-Sep-01 11691 12
October
1 11703 12
2 11713 10
3 11724 11
4 11733 9
5 11743 10
6 11754 11
7 11766 12
8 11777 11
9 11788 11
10 11796 8
11 11804 8
12 11816 12
13 11825 9
14 11834 9 /
15 11852 18 Maximum Daily Flow I
16 11862 10
17 11869 7
18 11879 10
19 11891 12
20 11901 10
21 11912 11
22 11921 9
23 11930 9
24 11940 10
25 11941 1
26 11958 17
27 11966 8
28 11975 9
29 11990 15
30 11999 9
31 12009 10
Average Daily Flow 10
7 t:i )-/i
I c! ;-/5
CANTERBURY PUMP HOUSE-PAGE 11
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max, Diy, Flow (cu.m)
31-0ct-01 12009 10
November
1 12019 10
2 12027 8
3 12034 7
4 12041 7
5 12057 16
6 12064 7
7 12078 14
8 12089 11
9 12106 17 Maximum Daily Flow I
10 12116 10
11 12129 13
12 12143 14
13 12154 11
14 12162 8
15 12178 16
16 12187 9
17 12197 10
18 12207 10
19 12221 14
20 12232 11
21 12243 11
22 12253 10
23 12262 9
24 12273 11
25 12281 8
26 12296 15
27 12303 7
28 12313 10
29 12323 10
30 12335 12
Average Daily Flow 11
CANTERBURYPUMPHOUSE-PAGE12
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max, Diy. Flow (cu,m)
30-Nov-01 12335 12
December
1 12343 8
2 12351 8
3 12362 11
4 12372 10
5 12382 10
6 12391 9
7 12402 11
8 12412 10
9 12424 12
10 12439 15
11 12447 8
12 12460 13
13 12470 10
14 12481 11
15 12492 11
16 12501 9
17 12514 13
18 12521 7
19 12533 12
20 12545 12
21 12554 9
22 12563 9
23 12577 14
24 12588 11
25 12597 9
26 12614 17 Maximum Daily Flow I
27 12623 9
28 12631 8
29 12642 11
30 12653 11
31 12665 12
Average Daily Flow 11
7 ~ ) -(b
IJL}- I
REPORT
DEPT. REPORT TO: Council PREPARED BY:
#ES2002-16 Keith Mathieson
SUBJECT & FILE #: DEPARTMENT:
COUNCIL:
Annual Performance Report- Public Works
Cedarbrook Water Supply
C.OFW. and Treatment for 2001
MOTION #: DATE:
DATE: March 22, 2002
The Township has received the new Certificates of Approval (C, of A's) issued by the Ministry of the
Environment for all the water systems. Section 4 of the C. of A, Compliance Report, requires a
written report detailing that compliance with all terms and conditions of the approval be completed
annually, This Report is to be signed by a person designated by Council of the municipality that owns
the works and a resolution is to be presented to Council that the compliance report has been
received.
This first Compliance Report is due by March 31,2003.
Attached is Cedarbrook's Annual Performance Report for 2001, which was submitted to the Ministry
of the Environment. This Report was structured to comply with next year's Compliance Report and is
being made available to Council for information and confirmation that Ontario Regulation #459/00 is
being complied with by the Township of Oro-Medonte,
1, THAT Council receives and adopts this report.
2, THAT Council designates the Director of Engineering and Environmental Services as the signing
authority for the Compliance Report,
3. THAT the Annual Performance Report for Cedarbrook Water Supply and Treatment 2001 be
rece" d for information.
~
~
Keith Mathieson
'~J-Z.
C.A.O. COMMENTS:
DATE:
f
C.A.O.:
DEPT. HEAD:
1-e..1-~
THE CORPORATION OF THE
-- -"' ._" .-.- --.--
148 Line 7 S., Box 100
Oro, Ontario LOL 2XO
TOWN~tIIP
C9m-or7%edn/e
Phone (705) 487-2171
Fax (705) 487-0133
www.township.oro-medonte.on.ca
March 11, 2002
Ministry of the Environment
54 Cedar Pointe Drive
Unit #1203
BARRIE, Ontario
L4N 5R7
Re: Cedarbrook Water Supply and Treatment
Annual Performance Report for 2001
Dear Sir:
Permit to Take Water #95-P-5036 for Well #'s 1 and 2 was issued to the Township of
Oro-Medonte on November 24, 1995, expiring March 31, 2006, permitting 194 m3 of
water taken per day for each well.
The Cedarbrook water system supplies water to 24 homes.
WA TER QUANTITY
Schedules have been attached showing the "average daily flow" per month and the
"maximum daily flow" per month for the Cedarbrook system. At no time during 2001 did
the "maximum daily flow" exceed the Permit to Take Water.
WATER QUALITY
Bacteriological samples were taken weekly by Township operators and submitted to the
Central Ontario Analytical Laboratory in Orillia, Two hundred and twenty-seven (227)
samples were tested for "total coliforms" and "fecal coliforms" in 2001, One (1) test
result during the year had a reportable count of "total coliforms". MOEE Spills Action
Centre and the Simcoe County District Health Unit were notified and a resample was
taken, No further action was required.
, , ./2
7.Q.)-~
Page Two
Letter to M,O,E,
Re: Cedarbrook - Annual Performance Report for 2001
March 11, 2002
To ensure that the free chlorine residual was maintained above 0,2 mg/L in the
distribution system, and a free chlorine residual was available in the distribution system,
12% Sodium Hypochlorite was pumped into the system, A total of 60 litres of 12%
Sodium Hypochlorite was used in the Cedarbrook system in 2001.
Daily tests for free chlorine in the treatment plant and in the distribution system were
performed by Township operators using a "Hack Pocket Colorimeter",
Daily tests for turbidity were performed by Township operators using a "Hack Pocket
Turbidity Meter".
Quarterly water quality analyses sampling was performed by Geospec Engineering Ltd.
in order to satisfy testing parameters for treated water as per Regulation #459/00.
Samples were forwarded to Lakefield Research Limited for chemical testing.
The chemical results did not reveal any health related, reportable exceedences during
2001.
Mr. Fred MacGregor, Environmental Foreman of the Township of Oro-Medonte,
performed a calibration test on the existing water meters on May 8, 2001 and they were
calibrated at .62%, which is well within Ministry of Environment guidelines,
If you require any further information with regards to the Cedarbrook water system,
please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at (705) 487-6499.
Sincerely,
ORO-MEDONTE
Keith Mathieson, C.R.S,I.
Director of Engineering and Environmental Services
KM/ps
Attachments
f J<.. } -,:)
CEDARBROOK PUMP HOUSE-PAGE 1
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max, Diy. Flow (cu.m)
January
1 62615
2 62630 15
3 62640 10
4 62650 10
5 62662 12
6 62671 9
7 62684 13
8 62696 12
9 62705 9
10 62717 12
11 62728 11
12 62737 9
13 62745 8
14 62756 11
15 62769 13
16 62781 12
17 62794 13
18 62805 11
19 62813 8
20 62822 9
21 62838 16 Maximum Daily Flow I
22 62853 15
23 62862 9
24 62874 12
25 62884 10
26 62896 12
27 62904 8
28 62913 9
29 62927 14
30 62935 8
31 62947 12
Average Daily Flow 11
7.J..)-b
CEDARBROOKPUMPHOUSE-PAGE2
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max, DIy. Flow (cu.m)
31-Jan-01 62947 12
February
1 62957 10
2 62969 12
3 62978 9
4 62989 11
5 63006 17
6 63014 8
7 63027 13
8 63037 10
9 63047 10
10 63057 10
11 63070 13
12 63084 14
13 63096 12
14 63105 9
15 63117 12
16 63128 11
17 63139 11
18 63150 11
19 63164 14
20 63173 9
21 63183 10
22 63192 9
23 63200 8
24 63211 11
25 63222 11
26 63240 18 Maximum Daily Flow I
27 63248 8
28 63258 10
Average Daily Flow 11
7~)-7
CEDARBROOKPUMPHOUSE-PAGE3
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max, Diy, Flow (cu.m)
28-Feb-01 63258 10
March
1 63267 9
2 63279 12
3 63290 11
4 63300 10
5 63316 16 Maximum Daily Flow I
6 63322 6
7 63337 15
8 63344 7
9 63358 14
10 63365 7
11 63378 13
12 63391 13
13 63399 8
14 63408 9
15 63418 10
16 63433 15
17 63449 16
18 63460 11
19 63476 16
20 63485 9
21 63499 14
22 63508 9
23 63521 13
24 63530 9
25 63540 10
26 63554 14
27 63562 8
28 63576 14
29 63587 11
30 63600 13
31 63607 7
Average Daily Flow 11
7.L)-~
CEDARBROOKPUMPHOUSE-PAGE4
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max, Diy, Flow (cu.m)
31-Mar-01 63607 7
April
1 63620 13
2 63635 15
3 63644 9
4 63656 12
5 63667 11
6 63680 13
7 63689 9
8 63698 9
9 63715 17
10 63725 10
11 63737 12
12 63746 9
13 63757 11
14 63768 11
15 63778 10
16 63799 21 Maximum Daily Flow I
17 63814 15
18 63824 10
19 63833 9
20 63844 11
21 63853 9
22 63871 18
23 63882 11
24 63891 9
25 63902 11
26 63913 11
27 63924 11
28 63937 13
29 63954 17
30 63966 12
Average Daily Flow 12
7~}-~
CEDARBROOKPUMPHOUSE-PAGE5
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max. Diy. Flow (cu.m)
30-Apr-Q1 63966 12
,
May
1 63979 13
2 63999 20
3 64023 24
4 64044 21
5 64069 25 Maximum Daily Flow I
6 64087 18
7 64104 17
8 64117 13
9 64128 11
10 64137 9
11 64151 14
12 64165 14
13 64177 12
14 64192 15
15 64203 11
16 64217 14
17 64228 11
18 64237 9
19 64247 10
20 64262 15
21 64276 14
22 64292 16
23 64303 11
24 64315 12
25 64327 12
26 64342 15
27 64356 14
28 64369 13
29 64380 11
30 64392 12
31 64404 12
Average Daily Flow 14
7fJ.)-/o
CEDARBROOKPUMPHOUSE.PAGE6
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max, Diy. Flow (cu,m)
31-May-G1 64404 12
June
1 64412 8
2 64418 6
3 64430 12
4 64447 17
5 64459 12
6 64471 12
7 64481 10
8 64491 10
9 64509 18
10 64527 18
11 64549 22
12 64563 14
13 64576 13
14 64592 16
15 64614 22
16 64628 14
17 64643 15
18 64663 20
19 64675 12
20 64685 10
21 64727 42 Maximum Daily Flow 1
22 64741 14
23 64754 13
24 64768 14
25 64784 16
26 64799 15
27 64830 31
28 64852 22
29 64872 20
30 64889 17
Average Daily Flow 16
7L)-11
CEDARBROOKPUMPHOUSE-PAGE7
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max, Diy. Flow (cu.m)
30-Jun-Q1 64889 17
July
1 64901 12
2 64914 13
3 64928 14
4 64937 9
5 64949 12
6 64960 11
7 64975 15
8 64985 10
9 65009 24
10 65043 34
11 65063 20
12 65092 29
13 65120 28
14 65154 34
15 65187 33
16 65232 45 Maximum Daily Flow I
17 65242 10
18 65261 19
19 65304 43
20 65321 17
21 65339 18
22 65362 23
23 65379 17
24 65395 16
25 65418 23
26 65453 35
27 65488 35
28 65523 35
29 65558 35
30 65594 36
31 65620 26
Average Daily Flow 24
7~ )-/2
CEDAR BROOK PUMP HOUSE. PAGE 8
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS. 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max. Diy. Flow (cu,m)
31-Jul-01 65620 26
August
1 65671 51
2 65730 59 Maximum Daily Flow I
3 65784 54
4 65820 36
5 65856 36
6 65892 36
7 65942 50
8 65980 38
9 66019 39
10 66054 35
11 66080 26
12 66112 32
13 66160 48
14 66195 35
15 66237 42
16 66267 30
17 66280 13
18 66293 13
19 66305 12
20 66322 17
21 66331 9
22 66347 16
23 66363 16
24 66383 20
25 66403 20
26 66420 17
27 66432 12
28 66443 11
29 66453 10
30 66467 14
31 66478 11
A verage Daily Flow 28
7L)-/3
CEDARBROOKPUMPHOUSE-PAGE9
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max. DIy. Flow (cu,m)
31-Aug-01 66478 11
September
1 66490 12
2 66508 18
3 66532 24 Maximum Daily Flow I
4 66554 22
5 66568 14
6 66584 16
7 66597 13
8 66617 20
9 66638 21
10 66653 15
11 66665 12
12 66679 14
13 66690 11
14 66703 13
15 66711 8
16 66720 9
17 66737 17
18 66747 10
19 66756 9
20 66768 12
21 66778 10
22 66785 7
23 66795 10
24 66811 16
25 66822 11
26 66831 9
27 66843 12
28 66855 12
29 66865 10
30 66878 13
Average Daily Flow 13
CEDAR BROOK PUMP HOUSE-PAGE 10
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max. Diy, Flow (cu.m)
30-Sep-01 66878 13
October
1 66900 22 Maximum Daily Flow I
2 66910 10
3 66921 11
4 66933 12
5 66944 11
6 66957 13
7 66972 15
8 66987 15
9 66998 11
10 67007 9
11 67019 12
12 67031 12
13 67040 9
14 67048 8
15 67065 17
16 67076 11
17 67086 10
18 67096 10
19 67108 12
20 67120 12
21 67132 12
22 67145 13
23 67157 12
24 67169 12
25 67178 9
26 67189 11
27 67200 11
28 67208 8
29 67226 18
30 67236 10
31 67245 9
Average Daily Flow 12
7~)- l'f
I
7.0-)/5
CEDARBROOKPUMPHOUSE-PAGE11
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max, Diy, Flow (cu.m)
31-0ct-01 67245 9
November
1 67255 10
2 67264 9
3 67273 9
4 67283 10
5 67301 18 Maximum Daily Flow I
6 67312 11
7 67324 12
8 67333 9
9 67341 8
10 67349 8
11 67360 11
12 67373 13
13 67386 13
14 67397 11
15 67407 10
16 67417 10
17 67426 9
18 67438 12
19 67451 13
20 67463 12
21 67474 11
22 67484 10
23 67494 10
24 67502 8
25 67518 16
26 67527 9
27 67538 11
28 67548 10
29 67558 10
30 67570 12
Average Daily Flow 11
7 ~ )-J~
CEDARBROOKPUMPHOUSE-PAGE12
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max, Diy, Flow (cu.m)
30-Nov-01 67570 12
December
1 67580 10
2 67591 11
3 67606 15
4 67617 11
5 67627 10
6 67638 11
7 67647 9
8 67657 10
9 67667 10
10 67683 16
11 67692 9
12 67702 10
13 67712 10
14 67722 10
15 67733 11
16 67748 15
17 67760 12
18 67771 11
19 67782 11
20 67791 9
21 67801 10
22 67812 11
23 67826 14
24 67841 15
25 67859 18
26 67872 13
27 67886 14
28 67893 7
29 67907 14
30 67928 21 Maximum Daily Flow I
31 67939 11
Average Daily Flow 12
REPORT
76)- I
DEPT. REPORT TO: Council PREPARED BY: i1
#ES2002-17 Keith Mathieson
SUBJECT & FILE #: DEPARTMENT:
COUNCIL:
Annual Performance Report - Public Works
Craigpurst Water Supply
C.OFW. and Treatment for 2001
MOTION #: DATE:
DATE: March 22, 2002
The Township has received the new Certificates of Approval (C, of A's) issued by the Ministry of the
Environment for all the water systems, Section 4 of the C. of A., Compliance Report, requires a
written report detailing that compliance with all terms and conditions of the approval be completed
annually, This Report is to be signed by a person designated by Council of the municipality that owns
the works and a resolution is to be presented to Council that the compliance report has been
received.
This first Compliance Report is due by March 31,2003,
Attached is Craighurst's Annual Performance Report for 2001, which was submitted to the Ministry of
the Environment. This Report was structured to comply with next year's Compliance Report and is
being made available to Council for information and confirmation that Ontario Regulation #459/00 is
being complied with by the Township of Oro-Medonte,
1 . THAT Council receives and adopts this report.
2, THAT Council designates the Director of Engineering and Environmental Services as the signing
authority for the Compliance Report.
3. THAT the Annual Performance Report for Craighurst Water Supply and Treatment 2001 be
received for information.
RespecQ submitted,
~~
Keith Mathieson
~
tyJ;p
7~) ~
C.A.O. COMMENTS:
DATE:
C.A.O.:
DEPT. HEAD:
7 ~ J 3
THE CORPORATION OF THE
148 Line 7 S., Box 100
Oro. Ontario LOL 2X0 .
TOWN~tIIP
-&m-Of7#6~
Phone (70S) 487-2171
Fax (70S) 487-0133 .
www.township.oro-medonte.on.ca
March 11, 2002
Ministry of the Environment
54 Cedar Pointe Drive
Unit #1203
BARRIE, Ontario
L4N 5R7
Re: Craighurst Water Supply and Treatment
Annual Performance Report for 2001
Dear Sir:
Permit to Take Water Renewal #92-P-3120 for Well #'s 1, 2 and 3 was issued to the
Township of Oro-Medonte on December 14, 2001, expiring on December 15, 2011,
permitting 64 m3 for Well #1, 229 m3 for Well #2, and 229 m3 for Well #3, of water to be
taken per day.
The Craighurst water system supplies 51 homes with water.
WATER QUANTITY
Schedules have been attached showing the "average daily flow" per month and the
"maximum daily flow" per month for the Craighurst system, At no time during 2001 did
the "maximum daily flow" exceed the Permit to Take Water.
WATER QUALITY
Bacteriological samples were taken weekly by Township operators and submitted to the
Central Ontario Analytical Laboratory in Orillia. Two hundred and twenty-seven (227)
samples were tested for "total coliforms" and "fecal coliforms" in 2001. One (1) test
result during the year had a reportable count of "total coliforms". MOEE Spills Action
Centre and the Simcoe County District Health Unit were notified and a resample was
taken, No further action was required,
. , ./2
7~) t
Page Two
Letter to M,O,E.
Re: Craighurst - Annual Performance Report for 2001
March 11, 2002
To ensure that the free chlorine residljal was maintained above 0.2 mg/L in the
distribution system, and a free chlorine residual was available in the distribution system,
12% Sodium Hypochlorite was pumped into the system. A total of 150 litres of 12%
Sodium Hypochlorite was used in the Craighurst system in 2001,
Daily tests for free chlorine in the treatment plant and in the distribution system were
performed by Township operators using a "Hack Pocket Colorimeter",
Daily tests for turbidity were performed by Township operators using a "Hack Pocket
Turbidity Meter".
Quarterly water quality analyses sampling was performed by Geospec Engineering Ltd.
in order to satisfy testing parameters for treated water as per Regulation #459/00.
Samples were forwarded to Lakefield Research Limited for chemical testing.
The chemical results revealed the raw water samples obtained in Craighurst to have a
sodium value above 20 mg/L ranging from 20,1 to 25.8 mg/L. The Simcoe County
District Health Unit has been made aware of the slightly elevated sodium readings by
letter dated November 7, 2000 (attached). Non health related results revealed
conductivity values ranging from 657-1050 umhos/cm and hardness ranging from 275-
341 mg/L.
Mr. Fred MacGregor, Environmental Foreman of the Township of Oro-Medonte,
performed a calibration test on the existing water meters on May 8, 2001 and they were
calibrated at ,25%, which is well within Ministry of Environment guidelines.
If you require any further information with regards to the Craighurst water system,
please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at (705) 487-6499.
Sincerely,
o ORO-MEDONTE
Keith Mathieson, C.R.S.I.
Director of Engineering and Environmental Services
KM/ps
Attachments
CRAIG HURST PUMP HOUSE - PAGE 1
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max, Diy. Flow (cu,m)
January
1 76082
2 76117 35
3 76145 28
4 76172 27
5 76201 29
6 76224 23
7 76256 32
8 76295 39
9 76328 33
10 76354 26
11 76381 27
12 76404 23
13 76427 23
14 76454 27
15 76500 46
16 76525 25
17 76559 34
18 76586 27
19 76608 22
20 76632 24
21 76660 28
22 76697 37
23 76741 44
24 76787 46 Maximum Daily Flow 1
25 76810 23
26 76836 26
27 76863 27
28 76891 28
29 76930 39
30 76962 32
31 76980 18
Average Daily Flow 30
7-tJ5
CRAIG HURST PUMPHOUSE - PAGE 2
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max. Diy. Flow (cu.m)
31-Jan-01 76980 18
February
1 77002 22
2 77030 28
3 77056 26
4 77085 29
5 77123 38
6 77155 32
7 77177 22
8 77207 30
9 77233 26
10 77248 15
11 77279 31
12 77320 41 Maximum Daily Flow 1
13 77343 23
14 77370 27
15 77397 27
16 77418 21
17 77443 25
18 77468 25
19 77499 31
20 77531 32
21 77558 27
22 77583 25
23 77606 23
24 77627 21
25 77656 29
26 77693 37
27 77729 36
28 77749 20
Average Daily Flow 27
7~) b
CRAIGHURST PUMPHOUSE - PAGE 3
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max, Diy. Flow (cu.m)
28-Feb-01 77749 20
March
1 77762 13
2 77788 26
3 77814 26
4 77846 32
5 77881 35
6 77912 31
7 77942 30
8 77969 27
9 78001 32
10 78020 19
11 78051 31
12 78091 40
13 78124 33
14 78143 19
15 78168 25
16 78202 34
17 78221 19
18 78263 42 Maximum Daily Flow I
19 78292 29
20 78332 40
21 78347 15
22 78375 28
23 78406 31
24 78428 22
25 78463 35
26 78502 39
27 78534 32
28 78560 26
29 78585 25
30 78616 31
31 78634 18
Average Daily Flow 29
7S) 7
CRAIG HURST PUMPHOUSE - PAGE 4
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max, Diy. Flow (cu,m)
31-Mar-01 78634 18
April
1 78670 36
2 78708 38
3 78741 33
4 78770 29
5 78796 26
6 78815 19
7 78847 32
8 78879 32
9 78915 36
10 78943 28
11 78970 27
12 78999 29
13 79033 34
14 79057 24
15 79080 23
16 79114 34
17 79161 47
18 79193 32
19 79221 28
20 79243 22
21 79266 23
22 79304 38
23 79342 38
24 79381 39
25 79416 35
26 79446 30
27 79488 42
28 79515 27
29 79561 46
30 79620 59 Maximum Daily Flow I
Average Daily Flow 33
7-8)8
CRAIGHURST PUMPHOUSE - PAGE 5
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max. Diy. Flow (cu.m)
30-Apr-01 79620 59
May '.
1 79687 67
2 79754 67
3 79821 67
4 79880 59
5 79920 40
6 79980 60
7 80120 140 Maximum Daily Flow I
8 80176 56
9 80212 36
10 80269 57
11 80305 36
12 80343 38
13 80367 24
14 80420 53
15 80484 64
16 80541 57
17 80598 57
18 80618 20
19 80649 31
20 80706 57
21 80817 111
22 80884 67
23 80918 34
24 80959 41
25 80970 11
26 80998 28
27 81034 36
28 81071 37
29 81096 25
30 81137 41
31 81159 22
Average Daily Flow 50
7~) ~
CRAIG HURST PUMP HOUSE - PAGE 6
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max, Diy. Flow (cu,m)
31-May-01 81159 22
June
1 81183 24
2 81204 21
3 81240 36
4 81287 47
5 81316 29
6 81351 35
7 81377 26
8 81411 34
9 81445 34
10 81523 78
11 81573 50
12 81664 91
13 81718 54
14 81792 74
15 81864 72
16 81932 68
17 82002 70
18 82109 107 Maximum Daily Flow I
19 82153 44
20 82249 96
21 82325 76
22 82363 38
23 82395 32
24 82430 35
25 82499 69
26 82567 68
27 82659 92
28 82717 58
29 82782 65
30 82870 88
Average Daily Flow 57
7 ~ ) /0
CRAIG HURST PUMP HOUSE - PAGE 7
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max. Diy, Flow (cu,m)
30-Jun-Q1 82870 88
July
1 82919 49
2 82954 35
3 83006 52
4 83052 46
5 83097 45
6 83148 51
7 83196 48
8 83246 50
9 83417 171 Maximum Daily Flow I
10 83532 115
11 83605 73
12 83673 68
13 83727 54
14 83838 111
15 83950 112
16 84113 163
17 84181 68
18 84236 55
19 8434 7 111
20 84463 116
21 84518 55
22 84574 56
23 84632 58
24 84713 81
25 84792 79
26 84860 68
27 84997 137
28 85139 142
29 85281 142
30 85421 140
31 85567 146
Average Daily Flow 87
7~)JI
CRAIGHURST PUMPHOUSE - PAGE 8
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max. Diy. Flow (cu.m)
31-Jul-01 85567 146
August
1 85713 146
2 85859 146
3 86006 147
4 86169 163
5 86332 163
6 86495 163
7 86692 197 Maximum Daily Flow I
8 86846 154
9 86996 150
10 87070 74
11 87153 83
12 87274 121
13 87415 141
14 87514 99
15 87608 94
16 87683 75
17 87717 34
18 87775 58
19 87832 57
20 87863 31
21 87898 35
22 87924 26
23 87959 35
24 87988 29
25 88019 31
26 88050 31
27 88091 41
28 88112 21
29 88147 35
30 88182 35
31 88220 38
Average Daily Flow 86
76 )J~
CRA~HURSTPUMPHOUSE-PAGE9
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max. Diy. Flow (cu.m)
31-Aug-G1 88220 38
September
1 88262 42
2 88287 25
3 88329 42
4 88385 56 Maximum Daily Flow I
5 88419 34
6 88450 31
7 88489 39
8 88525 36
9 88562 37
10 88594 32
11 88623 29
12 88656 33
13 88678 22
14 88697 19
15 88717 20
16 88736 19
17 88786 50
18 88815 29
19 88837 22
20 88858 21
21 88875 17
22 88900 25
23 88925 25
24 88967 42
25 88994 27
26 89025 31
27 89045 20
28 89072 27
29 89094 22
30 89140 46
Average Daily Flow 31
7~)J3
CRAIG HURST PUMPHOUSE - PAGE 10
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max, Diy, Flow (cu,m)
30-Sep-01 89140 46
October
1 89193 53 Maximum Daily Flow I
2 89221 28
3 89248 27
4 89277 29
5 89298 21
6 89327 29
7 89357 30
8 89383 26
9 89422 39
10 89451 29
11 89473 22
12 89494 21
13 89519 25
14 89545 26
15 89591 46
16 89607 16
17 89636 29
18 89657 21
19 89684 27
20 89712 28
21 89741 29
22 89768 27
23 89798 30
24 89819 21
25 89837 18
26 89860 23
27 89881 21
28 89910 29
29 89943 33
30 89987 44
31 90016 29
Average Daily Flow 28
7t ) I~
CRAIGHURST PUMP HOUSE - PAGE 11
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max, Diy, Flow (cu,m)
31-0ct-01 90016 29
November
1 90041 25
2 90065 24
3 90087 22
4 90110 23
5 90162 52 Maximum Daily Flow I
6 90178 16
7 90199 21
8 90235 36
9 90258 23
10 90281 23
11 90304 23
12 90341 37
13 90375 34
14 90400 25
15 90426 26
16 90451 25
17 90475 24
18 90500 25
19 90539 39
20 90571 32
21 90592 21
22 90619 27
23 90642 23
24 90667 25
25 90699 32
26 90739 40
27 90759 20
28 90779 20
29 90807 28
30 90839 32
Average Daily Flow 27
7~ ) J5
7 -8 ) 16
CRAIG HURST PUMPHOUSE - PAGE 12
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max, Diy, Flow (cu.m)
30-Nov-01 90839 32
December
1 90862 23
2 90890 28
3 90916 26
4 90943 27
5 90967 24
6 90986 19
7 91010 24
8 91037 27
9 91058 21
10 91098 40
11 91129 31
12 91164 35
13 91195 31
14 91223 28
15 91266 43
16 91291 25
17 91322 31
18 91360 38
19 91386 26
20 91407 21
21 91438 31
22 91464 26
23 91502 38
24 91543 41
25 91573 30
26 91599 26
27 91649 50
28 91686 37
29 91699 13
30 91751 52 Maximum Daily Flow 1
31 91777 26
Average Daily Flow 30
REPORT
7 J) - I
DEPT. REPORT TO: Council PREPARED BY:
#ES2002-18 Keith Mathieson .
SUBJECT & FILE #: DEPARTMENT:
COUNCIL:
Annual Performance Report - Public Works
Harbourwood Water Supply
C.OFW. and :Treatment for 2001
MOTION #: DATE:
DATE: March 22, 2002
BACKGROU
The Township has received the new Certificates of Approval (C. of A's) issued by the Ministry of the
Environment for all the water systems, Section 4 of the C. of A, Compliance Report, requires a
written report detailing that compliance with all terms and conditions of the approval be completed
annually. This Report is to be signed by a person designated by Council of the municipality that owns
the works and a resolution is to be presented to Council that the compliance report has been
received,
This first Compliance Report is due by March 31,2003,
SUMMARY:
Attached is Harbourwood's Annual Performance Report for 2001, which was submitted to the Ministry
of the Environment. This Report was structured to comply with next year's Compliance Report and is
being made available to Council for information and confirmation that Ontario Regulation #459/00 is
being complied with by the Township of Oro-Medonte,
RECOMMENDATION
1, THAT Council receives and adopts this report.
2, THAT Council designates the Director of Engineering and Environmental Services as the signing
authority for the Compliance Report,
3, THAT the Annual Performance Report for Harbourwood Water Supply and Treatment 2001 be
recei d for information.
- ..
~~
\~
,~
7 J) I...-
C.A.O. COMMENTS:
DATE:
C.A.O.:
DEPT. HEAD:
7j J~
THE CORPORA nON OF THE
148 Line 7 S.. Box 100
Oro. Ontario LOL 2X0
TOWN~fiIP
r9m-or7#6edYW
Phone (705)487-2171
Fax (705)487-0133-
www.township.oro-medonte.on.ca
March 11, 2002
Ministry of the Environment
54 Cedar Pointe Drive
Unit #1203
BARRIE, Ontario
L4N 5R7
Re: Harbourwood Water Supply and Treatment
Annual Performance Report for 2001
Dear Sir:
Permit to Take Water #94-P-5041 for Well #'s 2 and 3 was issued to the Township of
Oro-Medonte on June 10,1994, expiring on March 31,2004, permitting 921 m30fwater
taken per day from each well,
The Harbourwood water system supplies 131 homes with water.
WATER QUANTITY
Schedules have been attached showing the "average daily flow" per month and the
"maximum daily flow" per month for the Harbourwood system. At no time during 2001
did the "maximum daily flow" exceed the Permit to Take Water.
WA TER QUALITY
Bacteriological samples were taken weekly by Township operators and submitted to the
Central Ontario Analytical Laboratory in Orillia. Two hundred and three (203) samples
were tested for "total coliforms" and "fecal coliforms" in 2001. One (1) test result during
the year had a reportable count of "total coliforms", MOEE Spills Action Centre and the
Simcoe County District Health Unit were notified and a resample was taken. No further
action was required,
, , ./2
...
7j) +
Page Two
Letter to M.O,E.
Re: Harbourwood - Annual Performance Report for 2001
March 11, 2002
To ensure that the free chlorine residual was maintained above 0.2 mg/L ~n the
distribution system, and a free chlorine residual was available in the distribution system,
12% Sodium Hypochlorite was pumped into the system. A total of 440 litres of 12%
Sodium Hypochlorite was used in the Harbourwood system in 2001,
Daily tests for free chlorine in the treatment plant and in the distribution system were
performed by Township operators using a "Hack Pocket Colorimeter",
Daily tests for turbidity were performed by Township operators using a "Hack Pocket
Turbidity Meter".
Quarterly water quality analyses sampling was performed by Geospec Engineering Ltd,
in order to satisfy testing parameters for treated water as per Regulation #459/00,
Samples were forwarded to Lakefield Research Limited for chemical testing,
The chemical results did not reveal any health related, reportable exceedences during
2001.
Mr. Fred MacGregor, Environmental Foreman of the Township of Oro-Medonte,
performed a calibration test on the existing water meters on May 19, 2001 and they
were calibrated at .35%, which is well within Ministry of Environment guidelines,
If you require any further information with regards to the Harbourwood water system,
please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at (705) 487-6499,
Sincerely,
~RO-M:DONTE
Keith Mathieson, C,R.S,I.
Director of Engineering and Environmental Services
KM/ps
Attachments
7j).5
HARBOURWOOD PUMP HOUSE-PAGE 1
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max, Diy, Flow (cu,m)
January
1 223675
2 223840 165 Maximum Daily Flow I
3 223944 104
4 224039 95
5 224122 83
6 224204 82
7 224302 98
8 224422 120
9 224500 78
10 224581 81
11 224663 82
12 224757 94
13 224827 70
14 224919 92
15 225043 124
16 225115 72
17 225217 102
18 225305 88
19 225372 67
20 225465 93
21 225558 93
22 225684 126
23 225757 73
24 225849 92
25 225949 100
26 226025 76
27 226103 78
28 226188 85
29 226317 129
30 226391 74
31 226482 91
Average Daily Flow 94
HARBOURWOODPUMPHOUSE-PAGE2
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max, Diy. Flow (cu,m)
31-Jan-01 226482 91
f
February
1 226578 96
2 226669 91
3 226750 81
4 226848 98
5 226951 103
6 227044 93
7 227137 93
8 227218 81
9 227291 73
10 227380 89
11 227488 108
12 227604 116
13 227686 82
14 227770 84
15 227869 99
16 227939 70
17 228029 90
18 228118 89
19 228221 103
20 228318 97
21 228394 76
22 228487 93
23 228563 76
24 228644 81
25 228738 94
26 228865 127 Maximum Daily Flow I
27 228936 71
28 229018 82
Average Daily Flow 91
7 CJ) b
v
lq)7
J
HARBOURWOODPUMPHOUSE-PAGE3
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max, Diy. Flow (cu,m)
28-Feb-01 229018 82
March
1 229098 80
2 229187 89
3 229263 76
4 229370 107
5 229475 105
6 229556 81
7 229648 92
8 229747 99
9 229826 79
10 229889 63
11 229988 99
12 230109 121
13 230185 76
14 230281 96
15 230360 79
16 230444 84
17 230524 80
18 230615 91
19 230741 126 Maximum Daily Flow I
20 230817 76
21 230911 94
22 230987 76
23 231078 91
24 231157 79
25 231259 102
26 231367 108
27 231444 77
28 231525 81
29 231610 85
30 231695 85
31 231760 65
Average Daily Flow 88
HARBOURWOODPUMPHOUSE-PAGE4
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max, Diy. Flow (cu.m)
31-Mar-01 231760 65
April
1 231866 106
2 231989 123
3 232065 76
4 232147 82
5 232259 112
6 232326 67
7 232406 80
8 232486 80
9 232646 160
10 232723 77
11 232821 98
12 232901 80
13 232997 96
14 233088 91
15 233164 76
16 233317 153
17 233405 88
18 233489 84
19 233574 85
20 233670 96
21 233748 78
22 233889 141
23 233978 89
24 234053 75
25 234146 93
26 234237 91
27 234321 84
28 234405 84
29 234575 170 Maximum Daily Flow I
30 234687 112
Average Daily Flow 98
ljh:
HARBOURWOODPUMPHOUSE-PAGE5
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max, Diy. Flow (cu.m)
30-Apr-01 234687 112
May
1 234788 101
2 234897 109
3 235041 144
4 235164 123
5 235248 84
6 235412 164
7 235619 207 Maximum Daily Flow I
8 235757 138
9 235852 95
10 235948 96
11 236071 123
12 236194 123
13 236316 122
14 236453 137
15 236548 95
16 236698 150
17 236826 128
18 236924 98
19 237012 88
20 237188 176
21 237365 177
22 237539 174
23 237630 91
24 237741 111
25 237838 97
26 237952 114
27 238066 114
28 238191 125
29 238285 94
30 238391 106
31 238487 96
Average Daily Flow 123
1j) ?
HARBOURWOODPUMPHOUSE-PAGE6
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max, Diy, Flow (cu.m)
31-May-01 238487 96
June
1 238593 106
2 238676 83
3 238772 96
4 238929 157
5 239021 92
6 239156 135
7 239254 98
8 239378 124
9 239502 124
10 239625 123
11 239779 154
12 239898 119
13 240001 103
14 240154 153
15 240289 135
16 240372 83
17 240540 168
18 240788 248 Maximum Daily Flow I
19 240939 151
20 241105 166
21 241280 175
22 241404 124
23 241504 100
24 241605 101
25 241774 169
26 241881 107
27 242086 205
28 242290 204
29 242462 172
30 242695 233
Average Daily Flow 140
11 ) J 6
HARBOURWOODPUMPHOUSE-PAGE7
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max. Diy. Flow (cu,m)
30-Jun-01 242695 233
July
1 242879 184
2 243025 146
3 243215 190
4 243369 154
5 243448 79
6 243567 119
7 243690 123
8 243796 106
9 243963 167
10 244248 285
11 244403 155
12 244619 216
13 244899 280
14 245286 387
15 245690 404 Maximum Daily Flow I
16 245939 249
17 246059 120
18 246220 161
19 246338 118
20 246624 286
21 246917 293
22 247045 128
23 247186 141
24 247326 140
25 247429 103
26 247585 156
27 247719 134
28 247926 207
29 248133 207
30 248340 207
31 248545 205
Average Daily Flow 189
7J ) J I
1J ) I ~
HARBOURWOOD PUMP HOUSE-PAGE 8
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max. Diy. Flow (cu.m)
31-Jul-Q1 248545 205
August
1 248758 213
2 249019 261
3 249299 280
4 249579 280
5 249859 280
6 250142 283
7 250594 452 Maximum Daily Flow I
8 250851 257
9 251123 272
10 251340 217
11 251443 103
12 251651 208
13 251947 296
14 252096 149
15 252312 216
16 252563 251
17 252674 111
18 252868 194
19 253062 194
20 253182 120
21 253256 74
22 253365 109
23 253497 132
24 253603 106
25 253713 110
26 253842 129
27 253928 86
28 254058 130
29 254131 73
30 254242 111
31 254331 89
Average Daily Flow 187
7:))L3
HARBOURWOODPUMPHOUSE-PAGE9
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max. Diy. Flow (cu,m)
31-Aug-Q1 254331 89
,"
September
1 254423 92
2 254519 96
3 254617 98
4 254794 177 Maximum Daily Flow I
5 254880 86
6 254957 77
7 255083 126
8 255155 72
9 255273 118
10 255377 104
11 255454 77
12 255561 107
13 255634 73
14 255721 87
15 255788 67
16 255873 85
17 256018 145
18 256096 78
19 256187 91
20 256281 94
21 256368 87
22 256441 73
23 256514 73
24 256649 135
25 256768 119
26 256834 66
27 256926 92
28 257015 89
29 257097 82
30 257180 83
Average Daily Flow 95
HARBOURWOODPUMPHOUSE-PAGE10
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max, Diy. Flow (cu,m)
30-Sep-01 257180 83
October
1 257319 139
2 257401 82
3 257494 93
4 257587 93
5 257665 78
6 257757 92
7 257850 93
8 257960 110
9 258071 111
10 258168 97
11 258277 109
12 258348 71
13 258428 80
14 258518 90
15 258653 135
16 258757 104
17 258825 68
18 258911 86
19 258994 83
20 259087 93
21 259179 92
22 259290 111
23 259369 79
24 259459 90
25 259542 83
26 259614 72
27 259695 81
28 259785 90
29 259925 140 Maximum Daily Flow I
30 260010 85
31 260090 80
Average Daily Flow 94
7J ) Ii
HARBOURWOODPUMPHOUSE-PAGE11
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max. Diy, Flow (cu.m)
31-0ct-01 260090 80
November
1 260182 92
2 260259 77
3 260335 76
4 260413 78
5 260546 133
6 260618 72
7 260699 81
8 260787 88
9 260873 86
10 260948 75
11 261047 99
12 261170 123
13 261274 104
14 261347 73
15 261447 100
16 261528 81
17 261618 90
18 261710 92
19 261858 148 Maximum Daily Flow I
20 261924 66
21 262014 90
22 262104 90
23 262183 79
24 262271 88
25 262392 121
26 262488 96
27 262564 76
28 262658 94
29 262737 79
30 262847 110
Average Daily Flow 92
7) )
I~
I"""";
7, ) I~
HARBOURWOOD PUMP HOUSE-PAGE 12
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max, Diy, Flow (cu,m)
30-Nov-01 262847 110
...
December
1 262899 52
2 263007 108
3 263152 145 Maximum Daily Flow I
4 263227 75
5 263301 74
6 263397 96
7 263491 94
8 263585 94
9 263675 90
10 263812 137
11 263889 77
12 263986 97
13 264071 85
14 264154 83
15 264243 89
16 264373 130
17 264477 104
18 264555 78
19 264662 107
20 264730 68
21 264801 71
22 264911 110
23 265000 89
24 265131 131
25 265243 112
26 265338 95
27 265473 135
28 265548 75
29 265579 31
30 265614 35
31 265689 75
Average Daily Flow 92
REPORT
7Jt)J
DEPT. REPORT TO: Council PREPARED BY:
#ES2002-19 Keith Mathieson .
SUBJECT & FILE #: DEPARTMENT:
COUNCIL:
Annual Performance Report - Public Works
Horse.shoe Highlands Water
C.OFW. Supply and Treatment for
2001
MOTION #: DATE:
DATE: March 22, 2002
BACKGRO
The Township has received the new Certificates of Approval (C. of A.'s) issued by the Ministry of the
Environment for all the water systems, Section 4 of the C, of A., Compliance Report, requires a
written report detailing that compliance with all terms and conditions of the approval be completed
annually, This Report is to be signed by a person designated by Council of the municipality that owns
the works and a resolution is to be presented to Council that the compliance report has been
received,
This first Compliance Report is due by March 31, 2003.
SUMMARY:
Attached is Horseshoe Highland's Annual Performance Report for 2001, which was submitted to the
Ministry of the Environment. This Report was structured to comply with next year's Compliance
Report and is being made available to Council for information and confirmation that Ontario
Regulation #459/00 is being complied with by the Township of Oro-Medonte,
RECOMMENDATIONS
1, THAT Council receives and adopts this report,
2, THAT Council designates the Director of Engineering and Environmental Services as the signing
authority for the Compliance Report,
3. THAT the Annual Performance Report for Horseshoe Highlands Water Supply and Treatment
20 be received for information.
~'
c~~~
~~
7~
,
\z.
I
I
(
C.A.O. COMMENTS:
DATE:
C.A.O.:
DEPT. HEAD:
7-A)3
THE CORPORATION OF THE
148 Line 7S.. Box 100
Oro. Ontario LOL 2X0 ·
TOWN~lIIP
r9/V-or7#6~
Phone (705)487-2171
Fax (70S) 487-0133
www.township.oro-medonte,on.0
March 11, 2002
Ministry of the Environment
54 Cedar Pointe Drive
Unit #1203
BARRIE, Ontario
L4N 5R7
Re: Horseshoe Highlands Water Supply and Treatment
Annual Performance Report for 2001
Dear Sir:
Permit to Take Water #94-P-3019 for Well #'s 1 and 2 was issued to the Township of
Oro-Medonte on March 3, 1994, expiring on March 31, 2004, permitting 3,371 m3 for
Well #1 and 527 m3 for Well #2, of water to be taken per day,
The Horseshoe Highlands water system supplies water to 362 units, which includes the
homes in Zone 1\ and Carriage Hills, plus Highlands Golf Course,
WATER QUANTITY
Schedules have been attached showing the "average daily flow" per month and the
"maximum daily flow" per month for the Horseshoe Highlands system, Water
consumption during the months of April to October was higher due to golf course
irrigation, At no time during 2001 did the "maximum daily flow" exceed the Permit to
Take Water,
WATER QUALITY
Bacteriological samples were taken weekly by Township operators and submitted to the
Central Ontario Analytical Laboratory in Orillia. Two hundred (200) samples were tested
for "total coliforms" and "fecal coliforms" in 2001 and no detectable results were found,
. . ./2
7~ ) ~
Page Two
Letter to M,O.E,
Re: Horseshoe Highlands - Annual Performance Report for 2001
March 11, 2002
To ensure that the free chlorine residual was maintained above 0,2 mg/L in the
distribution system, and a free chlorine residual was available in the distribution system,
12% Sodium Hypochlorite was pumped into the system, A total of 260 litres of 12%
Sodium Hypochlorite was used in the Horseshoe Highlands system in 2001.
Daily tests for free chlorine in the treatment plant and in the distribution system were
performed by Township operators using a "Hack Pocket Colorimeter".
Daily tests for turbidity were performed by Township operators using a "Hack Pocket
Turbidity Meter",
Quarterly water quality analyses sampling was performed by Geospec Engineering Ltd.
in order to satisfy testing parameters for treated water as per Regulation #459/00,
Samples were forwarded to Lakefield Research Limited for chemical testing.
Non health related results were detected with respect to hardness values ranging from
166-177 mg/L in all quarterly analysis samples in raw water (ODWS AO/OG limits 80-
100 mg/L),
The water meters for the Horseshoe Highlands water system were not calibrated during
2001, The Township is presently making arrangements to have the meters calibrated by
outside sources due to the size of meter and flow rate.
If you require any further information with regards to the Horseshoe Highlands water
system, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at (705) 487-6499,
Sincerely,
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
Keith Mathieson, C,R.S.I.
Director of Engineering and Environmental Services
KM/ps
Attachments
HORSESHOE HIGHLANDS PUMPHOUSE - PAGE 1
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max. Diy. Flow (cu.m)
January
1 343150
2 343345 195
3 343540 195
4 343735 195
5 343930 195
6 344125 195
7 344320 195
8 344515 195
9 344710 195
10 344905 195
11 345100 195
12 345295 195
13 345490 195
14 345685 195
15 345880 195
16 346075 195
17 346270 195
18 3464 70 200
19 346603 133
20 346801 198
21 347071 270 Maximum Daily Flow I
22 347207 136
23 347334 127
24 347465 131
25 347660 195
26 347851 191
27 348051 200
28 348243 192
29 348442 199
30 348572 130
31 348769 197
Average Daily Flow 187
7.A)S
HORSESHOE HIGHLANDS PUMPHOUSE - PAGE 2
MAXIMUM DAfL Y FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max, Diy. Flow (cu.m)
31-Jan-G1 348769 197
February
1 348897 128
2 349100 203
3 349292 192
4 349486 194
5 349680 194
6 349889 209
7 350034 145
8 350179 145
9 350325 146
10 350538 213
11 350727 189
12 350916 189
13 351100 184
14 351225 125
15 351408 183
16 351596 188
17 351852 256
18 352104 252
19 352287 183
20 352434 147
21 352641 207
22 352775 134
23 352958 183
24 353042 84
25 353161 119
26 353382 221
27 353642 260
28 353939 297 Maximum Daily Flow -,
Average Daily Flow 185
I JJ) 6
,
HORSESHOE HIGHLANDS PUMPHOUSE - PAGE 3
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max. Diy, Flow (cu,m)
28-Feb-01 353939 297
March
1 354059 120
2 354293 234
3 354469 176
4 354702 233
5 354961 259
6 355102 141
7 355276 174
8 355462 186
9 355682 220
10 355863 181
11 356234 371 Maximum Daily Flow I
12 356352 118
13 356467 115
14 356761 294
15 357057 296
16 357359 302
17 357541 182
18 357781 240
19 358020 239
20 358182 162
21 358350 168
22 358539 189
23 358729 190
24 358956 227
25 359148 192
26 359336 188
27 359514 178
28 359700 186
29 359821 121
30 359957 136
31 360045 88
Average Daily Flow 197
7~)7
HORSESHOE HIGHLANDS PUMPHOUSE - PAGE 4
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max. Diy. Flow (cu.m)
31-Mar-01 360045 88
April
1 360308 263
2 360565 257
3 360738 173
4 360897 159
5 360993 96
6 361076 83
7 361248 172
8 361421 173
9 361685 264
10 361848 163
11 361937 89
12 362107 170
13 362343 236
14 362558 215
15 362732 174
16 362988 256
17 363186 198
18 363482 296
19 363611 129
20 363698 87
21 363875 177
22 364229 354
23 364405 176
24 364698 293
25 364814 116
26 365001 187
27 365222 221
28 365880 658
29 366297 417
30 367427 1130 Maximum Daily Flow I
*WA TER USEAGE UP*
*VERY DRY WEATHER
ON APRIL 28, 29 AND 30.
Average Daily Flow 246
I~) g
I
HORSESHOE HIGHLANDS PUMPHOUSE - PAGE 5
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max. Diy. Flow (cu,m)
30-Apr-01 367427 1130
May *IRRIGATION
FROM MAY 1 THROUGH
TO MAY 8 - WATER
USEAGE HIGH*
1 368855 1428
2 370350 1495
3 372118 1768
4 373959 1841
5 375838 1879
6 377101 1263
7 379073 1972 Maximum Daily Flow I
8 380667 1594
9 380885 218
*NORMAL FLOW
AGAIN - NO IRRIGA TION*
10 381492 607
11 382721 1229
12 382941 220
13 383322 381
14 383785 463
15 385137 1352
16 386464 1327
17 387787 1323
18 388058 271
19 388226 168
20 389648 1422
21 391105 1457
22 391577 472
23 391847 270
24 392399 552
25 392790 391
26 393517 727
27 393702 185
28 393984 282
29 394257 273
30 394532 275
31 394718 186
A verage Daily Flow 880
1~)9
.
HORSESHOE HIGHLANDS PUMPHOUSE - PAGE 6
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max. Diy. Flow (cu,m)
31-May-G1 394718 186
June
1 395816 1098
2 396059 243
3 396338 279
4 396619 281
5 396890 271
6 397160 270
7 398449 1289
8 399703 1254
9 401108 1405
10 402654 1546
11 404047 1393
12 404258 211
13 405725 1467
14 407120 1395
15 408882 1762
16 410608 1726
17 411992 1384
18 413678 1686
19 415349 1671
20 416493 1144
21 418629 2136 Maximum Daily Flow I
22 419123 494
23 419580 457
24 420040 460
25 421488 1448
26 423178 1690
27 425272 2094
28 427228 1956
29 428951 1723
30 431084 2133
*HEAVY WATER USE*
*VERY HOT WEA THER*
Average Daily Flow 1212
\
7.A )IG
HORSESHOE HIGHLANDS PUMPHOUSE - PAGE 7
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max. Diy, Flow (cu.m)
30-Jun-G1 431084 2133
July
1 432832 1748
2 433322 490
3 435147 1825
4 436595 1448
5 437144 549
6 438671 1527
7 440306 1635
8 441906 1600
9 444193 2287
10 446262 2069
11 448205 1943
12 449676 1471
13 452010 2334
14 453630 1620
15 455240 1610
16 458272 3032 Maximum Daily Flow I
17 459993 1721
18 460639 646
19 463000 2361
20 465697 2697
21 467461 1764
22 467702 241
23 467816 114
24 469031 1215
25 470340 1309
26 471108 768
27 473828 2720
28 475816 1988
29 477804 1988
30 479790 1986
31 482439 2649
Average Daily Flow 1657
/,A)lf
.
l~ ) I ~
..
HORSESHOE HIGHLANDS PUMPHOUSE - PAGE 8
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max. Diy, Flow (cu.m)
31-Jul-01 482439 2649
August
1 484356 1917
2 486104 1748
3 488413 2309
4 491297 2884 Maximum Daily Flow I
5 493581 2284
6 495266 1685
7 497786 2520
8 500244 2458
9 502479 2235
10 503263 784
11 505471 2208
12 507777 2306
13 510073 2296
14 512101 2028
15 514209 2108
16 516245 2036
17 517035 790
18 518296 1261
19 519556 1260
20 519822 266
21 520392 570
22 521881 1489
23 523473 1592
24 525274 1801
25 526401 1127
26 527528 1127
27 528141 613
28 528899 758
29 529376 477
30 530868 1492
31 531378 510
Average Daily Flow 1579
l), ) /3
HORSESHOE HIGHLANDS PUMPHOUSE - PAGE 9
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max. Diy, Flow (cu,m)
31-Aug-Q1 531378 510
September
1 532337 959
2 532937 600
3 533801 864
4 534429 628
5 534962 533
6 535969 1007
7 537047 1078
8 537890 843
9 538732 842
10 539120 388
11 539482 362
12 540446 964
13 541341 895
14 541619 278
15 542302 683
16 542698 396
17 543397 699
18 544758 1361 Maximum Daily Flow I
19 545465 707
20 545755 290
21 546035 280
22 546455 420
23 546875 420
24 547202 327
25 547456 254
26 547688 232
27 547912 224
28 548099 187
29 548390 291
30 548682 292
Average Daily Flow 577
HORSESHOE HIGHLANDS PUMPHOUSE - PAGE 10
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max, Diy, Flow (cu,m)
30-Sep-01 548682 292
October
1 549163 481
2 550171 1008
3 550763 592
4 552699 1936 Maximum Daily Flow I
5 552883 184
6 553247 364
7 553613 366
8 554148 535
9 554677 529
10 554897 220
11 555210 313
12 555427 217
13 555609 182
14 555794 185
15 556170 376
16 556455 285
17 556989 534
18 557733 744
19 558403 670
20 558962 559
21 559522 560
22 560680 1158
23 561208 528
24 561396 188
25 561549 153
26 561769 220
27 561948 179
28 562131 183
29 562417 286
30 562603 186
31 562841 238
Average Daily Flow 457
7 ,h ) Ii
HORSESHOE HIGHLANDS PUMPHOUSE - PAGE 11
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max. Diy, Flow (cu.m)
31-Oct-01 562841 238
November
1 562987 146
2 563110 123
3 563292 182
4 563477 185
5 563759 282
6 563962 203
7 564232 270
8 564373 141
9 564484 111
10 564670 186
11 564959 289 Maximum Daily Flow I
12 565143 184
13 565294 151
14 565452 158
15 565609 157
16 565802 193
17 566021 219
18 566241 220
19 566398 157
20 566588 190
21 566756 168
22 566886 130
23 567073 187
24 567295 222
25 567441 146
26 567723 282
27 567905 182
28 568006 101
29 568206 200
30 568391 185
Average Daily Flow 185
1.J, ) IS
..
HORSESHOE HIGHLANDS PUMPHOUSE . PAGE 12
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS. 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max, Diy, Flow (cu.m)
30-Nov-01 568391 185
December
1 568491 100
2 568764 273
3 568955 191
4 569135 180
5 569287 152
6 569407 120
7 569497 90
8 569577 80
9 569915 338
10 570107 192
11 570290 183
12 570382 92
13 570565 183
14 570744 179
15 570919 175
16 571162 243
17 571300 138
18 571487 187
19 571649 162
20 571760 111
21 571943 183
22 572205 262
23 572316 111
24 572439 123
25 572699 260
26 573101 402
27 573556 455 Maximum Daily Flow I
28 573835 279
29 574045 210
30 574313 268
31 574698 385
Average Daily Flow 203
7 ~ ) )0
l~ ) /
REPORT
DEPT. REPORT TO: Council PREPARED BY: -
#ES2002-20 Keith Mathieson
SUBJECT & FILE #: DEPARTMENT:
COUNCIL:
Annual Performance Report - Public Works
Lake Simcoe Regional Airport
C.OFW. Water Supply and Treatment
for 2001
MOTION #: DATE:
DATE: March 22, 2002
The Township has received the new Certificates of Approval (C. of A.'s) issued by the Ministry of the
Environment for all the water systems. Section 4 of the C, of A, Compliance Report, requires a
written report detailing that compliance with all terms and conditions of the approval be completed
annually, This Report is to be signed by a person designated by Council of the municipality that owns
the works and a resolution is to be presented to Council that the compliance report has been
received.
This first Compliance Report is due by March 31,2003.
Attached is Lake Simcoe Regional Airport's Annual Performance Report for 2001 , which was
submitted to the Ministry of the Environment. This Report was structured to comply with next year's
Compliance Report and is being made available to Council for information and confirmation that
Ontario Regulation #459/00 is being complied with by the Township of Oro-Medonte,
1 . THAT Council receives and adopts this report.
2. THAT Council designates the Director of Engineering and Environmental Services as the signing
authority for the Compliance Report,
3. THAT the Annual Performance Report for Lake Simcoe Regional Airport Water Supply and
Treatment 2001 be received for information.
mitted,
~CUJ--
~
1~)l..
C.A.O. COMMENTS:
DATE:
C.A.O.:
DEPT. HEAD:
7~)3
THE CORPORATION OF THE
148 Line 7 S.. Box 100
Oro. Ontario LOL 2X0 .
TOWN6fIIP
-&m-or716edvW
Phone (705)487-2171
fax (705) 487-0133 ""
www.township.oro-medonte.on.ca
March 12, 2002
Ministry of the Environment
54 Cedar Pointe Drive
Unit #1203
BARRIE, Ontario
L4N 5R7
Re: Lake Simcoe Regional Airport Water Supply and Treatment
Annual Performance Report for 2001
Dear Sir:
Permit to Take Water #94-P-3027 for Well #'s 2 and 3 was issued to the Township of
Oro-Medonte on April 20, 1994, expiring on March 31, 2004, permitting 36m3 for Well #2
and 36m3 for Well #3, of water to be taken per day.
The Lake Simcoe Regional Airport water system supplies water to the Airport Terminal
Building and one hanger.
WA TER QUANTITY
Schedules have been attached showing the "average daily flow" per month and the
"maximum daily flow" per month for each of the Airport Wells,
On February 5th and March ih, 2001, Well #2 exceeded the Permit to Take (406 m3 and
235 m3) as the pressure relief valve failed, and from February 11th - 22nd, 2001,
Township Operators were flushing water mains. At no other time during 2001 did the
"maximum daily flow" exceed the Permit to Take Water.
WATER QUALITY
Bacteriological samples were taken weekly by Township operators and submitted to the
Central Ontario Analytical Laboratory in Orillia, Two hundred and twenty-four (224)
samples were tested for "total coliforms" and "fecal coliforms" in 2001 and no detectable
results were found, Weekly tests for colour were also performed by Central Ontario
Analytical Laboratory on raw water samples as per Certificate of Approval #7-0681-93-
946,
, . ./2
. \ '
7~)w..
i
10
Page Two
Letter to M.O,E,
Re: Lake Simcoe Regional Airport - Annual Performance Report for 2001
March 12, 2002
To ensure that the free chlorine residual was maintained above 0,2 mg/L in the
distribution system, and a free chlorine residual was available in the distribution system,
12% Sodium Hypochlorite was pumped into the system. A total of 50 litres of 12%
Sodium Hypochlorite was used in the Lake Simcoe Regional Airport system in 2001.
Daily tests for free chlorine in the treatment plant and in the distribution system were
performed by Township operators using a "Hack Pocket Colorimeter",
Daily tests for turbidity were performed by Township operators using a "Hack Pocket
Turbidity Meter".
Quarterly water quality analyses sampling was performed by Geospec Engineering Ltd.
in order to satisfy testing parameters for treated water as per Regulation #459/00,
Samples were forwarded to Lakefield Research Limited for chemical testing.
The chemical results did not reveal any health related, reportable exceedences during
2001. Non health related results were detected with respect to hardness values at 201-
219 mg/L (ODWS AOIOG limit 80-100 mg/L); Iron at 570 /-lg/L - 682 /-lg/L (ODWS
AOIOG limits 300 /-lg/L) , in all quarterly analysis samples, and aluminum at 1,270 /-lg/L
(ODWS AOIOG limit 100 /-lg/L) in samples collected November 28, 2001,
Mr. Fred MacGregor, Environmental Foreman of the Township of Oro-Medonte,
performed a calibration test on the existing water meters on May 7, 2001 and they were
calibrated at ,50%, which is well within Ministry of Environment guidelines,
If you require any further information with regards to the Lake Simcoe Regional Airport
water system, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at (705) 487-6499,
Sincerely,
~O-MEDONTE
Keith Mathieson, C,R.S,I.
Director of Engineering and Environmental Services
KM/ps
Attachments
LAKE SIMCOE REGIONAL AIRPORT PUMPHOUSE - WELL #2 - PAGE 1
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max, Diy. Flow (cu.m)
January
1 3035
2 3035 0
3 3035 0
4 3036 1
5 3037 1
6 3037 0
7 3037 0
8 3037 0
9 3037 0
10 3037 0
11 3037 0
12 3037 0
13 3037 0
14 3037 0
15 3037 0
16 3037 0
17 3040 3 Maximum Daily Flow I
18 3040 0
19 3040 0
20 3040 0
21 3040 0
22 3040 0
23 3040 0
24 3040 0
25 3040 0
26 3040 0
27 3040 0
28 3040 0
29 3040 0
30 3041 1
31 3042 1
Average Daily Flow 0
l~ )5
..
-
LAKE SIMCOE REGIONAL AIRPORT PUMPHOUSE - WELL #2 - PAGE 2
'"
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max. Diy, Flow (cu.m)
31-Jan-01 3042 1
February
1 3046 4
2 3047 1
3 3049 2
4 3052 3
5 3458 406 Maximum Daily Flow I
*PRESSURE RELIEF
VALVE FAILURE*
6 3464 6
7 3465 1
8 3472 7
9 3473 1
10 3474 1
11 3580 106
*FLUSHED MAINS*
12 3686 106
13 3712 26
14 3818 106
15 3923 105
16 4029 106
17 4135 106
18 4241 106
19 4346 105
20 4452 106
21 4558 106
22 4638 80
23 4639 1
24 4640 1
25 4643 3
26 4648 5
27 4649 1
28 4649 0
Average Daily Flow 57
OJ
7~ b
LAKE SIMCOE REGIONAL AIRPORT PUMPHOUSE - WELL #2 - PAGE 3
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max, Diy, Flow (cu.m)
28-Feb-01 4649 0
March
1 4650 1
2 4650 0
3 4651 1
4 4651 0
5 4652 1
6 4652 0
7 4887 235 Maximum Daily Flow I
*PRESSURE RELIEF
VALVE FAILURE*
8 4887 0
9 4888 1
10 4888 0
11 4889 1
12 4891 2
13 4899 8
14 4903 4
15 4906 3
16 4914 8
17 4914 0
18 4915 1
19 4915 0
20 4916 1
21 4918 2
22 4921 3
23 4921 0
24 4921 0
25 4922 1
26 4922 0
27 4923 1
28 4924 1
29 4924 0
30 4925 1
31 4925 0
Average Daily Flow 9
7~ )7
,
""
"
..
..
LAKE SIMCOE REGIONAL AIRPORT PUMPHOUSE - WELL #2 - PAGE 4
...
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max. Diy. Flow (cu.m)
31-Mar-01 4925 0
April
1 4925 0
2 4926 1 Maximum Daily Flow 1
3 4927 1
4 4927 0
5 4928 1
6 4928 0
7 4928 0
8 4929 1
9 4930 1
10 4930 0
11 4931 1
12 4931 0
13 4932 1
14 4932 0
15 4932 0
16 4932 0
17 4933 1
18 4934 1
19 4934 0
20 4935 1
21 4935 0
22 4936 1
23 4937 1
24 4938 1
25 4938 0
26 4939 1
27 4939 0
28 4939 0
29 4940 1
30 4941 1
Average Daily Flow 1
..
'"
7~ )~
LAKE SIMCOE REGIONAL AIRPORT PUMPHOUSE - WELL #2 - PAGE 5
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max, Diy, Flow (cu,m)
30-Apr-01 4941 1
May
1 4941 0
2 4941 0
3 4942 1
4 4942 0
5 4943 1
6 4946 3 Maximum Daily Flow I
7 4947 1
8 4948 1
9 4948 0
10 4949 1
11 4950 1
12 4951 1
13 4952 1
14 4953 1
15 4953 0
16 4954 1
17 4954 0
18 4955 1
19 4956 1
20 4956 0
21 4956 0
22 4957 1
23 4958 1
24 4959 1
25 4961 2
26 4962 1
27 4962 0
28 4963 1
29 4964 1
30 4965 1
31 4965 0
Average Daily Flow 1
-,~) i
...
...
'"
..
..
.
LAKE SIMCOE REGIONAL AIRPORT PUMPHOUSE - WELL #2 - PAGE 6
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max. Diy. Flow (cu.m)
31-May-01 4965 0
June
1 4966 1
2 4966 0
3 4966 0
4 4967 1
5 4967 0
6 4968 1
7 4968 0
8 4969 1
9 4969 0
10 4970 1
11 4971 1
12 4973 2 Maximum Daily Flow 1
13 4973 0
14 4974 1
15 4975 1
16 4975 0
17 4976 1
18 4977 1
19 4977 0
20 4979 2
21 4979 0
22 4979 0
23 4980 1
24 4981 1
25 4982 1
26 4982 0
27 4983 1
28 4985 2
29 4985 0
30 4986 1
Average Daily Flow 1
..
"
7.J-)/O
LAKE SIMCOE REGIONAL AIRPORT PUMPHOUSE - WELL #2 - PAGE 7
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max, Diy, Flow (cu.m)
30-Jun-01 4986 1
July
1 4986 0
2 4987 1
3 4988 1
4 4988 0
5 4989 1
6 4991 2
7 4994 3
8 4995 1
9 4996 1
10 4996 0
11 4997 1
12 4998 1
13 5000 2
14 5001 1
15 5002 1
16 5003 1
17 5007 4
18 5008 1
19 5009 1
20 5013 4
21 5014 1
22 5018 4
23 5025 7 Maximum Daily Flow I
24 5027 2
25 5028 1
26 5029 1
27 5032 3
28 5037 5
29 5042 5
30 5047 5
31 5052 5
Average Daily Flow 2
-,.:v)n
..
..
"
II
LAKE SIMCOE REGIONAL AIRPORT PUMPHOUSE - WELL #2 - PAGE 8
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max. Diy. Flow (cu.m)
31-Jul-01 5052 5
August
1 5062 10
2 5067 5
3 5073 6
4 5086 13 Maximum Daily Flow I
5 5092 6
6 5099 7
7 5107 8
8 5111 4
9 5114 3
10 5119 5
11 5120 1
12 5123 3
13 5131 8
14 5135 4
15 5135 0
16 5138 3
17 5143 5
18 5143 0
19 5143 0
20 5145 2
21 5145 0
22 5146 1
23 5147 1
24 5147 0
25 5147 0
26 5148 1
27 5148 0
28 5148 0
29 5149 1
30 5150 1
31 5151 1
Average Daily Flow 3
7.A-)1~
LAKE SIMCOE REGIONAL AIRPORT PUMPHOUSE - WELL #2 - PAGE 9
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max, Diy, Flow (cu.m)
31-Aug-01 5151 1
Sept.
1 5151 0
2 5151 0
3 5151 0
4 5152 1
5 5152 0
6 5153 1
7 5155 2 Maximum Daily Flow I
8 5155 0
9 5156 1
10 5156 0
11 5156 0
12 5157 1
13 5157 0
14 5157 0
15 5157 0
16 5158 1
17 5158 0
18 5159 1
19 5159 0
20 5161 2
21 5161 0
22 5161 0
23 5162 1
24 5162 0
25 5163 1
26 5164 1
27 5165 1
28 5165 0
29 5166 1
30 5167 1
Average Daily Flow 1
7 ~ ) J3
LAKE SIMCOE REGIONAL AIRPORT PUMPHOUSE - WELL #2 - PAGE 10
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max, Diy. Flow (cu,m)
30-Sep-01 5167 1
October
1 5167 0
2 5168 1
3 5168 0
4 5169 1
5 5170 1
6 5170 0
7 5171 1
8 5171 0
9 5172 1
10 5173 1
11 5174 1
12 5174 0
13 5176 2 Maximum Daily Flow I
14 5176 0
15 5177 1
16 5178 1
17 5178 0
18 5179 1
19 5179 0
20 5180 1
21 5181 1
22 5182 1
23 5182 0
24 5182 0
25 5183 1
26 5184 1
27 5184 0
28 5184 0
29 5185 1
30 5186 1
31 5187 1
Average Daily Flow 1
7 ,\ ,
t ' I
~} j 'i
LAKE SIMCOE REGIONAL AIRPORT PUMPHOUSE - WELL #2 - PAGE 11
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max, Diy, Flow (cu,m)
31-Oct-01 5187 1
November
1 5188 1
2 5189 1
3 5189 0
4 5189 0
5 5190 1
6 5191 1
7 5191 0
8 5192 1
9 5192 0
10 5193 1
11 5194 1
12 5194 0
13 5194 0
14 5195 1
15 5195 0
16 5195 0
17 5197 2
18 5201 4 Maximum Daily Flow I
19 5202 1
20 5202 0
21 5202 0
22 5202 0
23 5202 0
24 5203 1
25 5205 2
26 5207 2
27 5207 0
28 5207 0
29 5208 1
30 5209 1
Average Daily Flow 1
l~ ) }S
LAKE SIMCOE REGIONAL AIRPORT PUMPHOUSE - WELL #2 - PAGE 12
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max, Diy. Flow (cu,m)
30-Nov-01 5209 1
December
1 5211 2
2 5212 1
3 5214 2
4 5218 4
5 5221 3
6 5225 4 Maximum Daily Flow -I
7 5225 0
8 5226 1
9 5227 1
10 5228 1
11 5228 0
12 5229 1
13 5231 2
14 5232 1
15 5233 1
16 5234 1
17 5235 1
18 5236 1
19 5237 1
20 5239 2
21 5240 1
22 5241 1
23 5242 1
24 5243 1
25 5243 0
26 5244 1
27 5245 1
28 5246 1
29 5247 1
30 5248 1
31 5249 1
Average Daily Flow 1
7;"') Ib
LAKE SIMCOE REGIONAL AIRPORT PUMP HOUSE - WELL #3 - PAGE 1
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max. Diy. Flow (cu,m)
January
1 2224
2 2225 1
3 2225 0
4 2226 1
5 2226 0
6 2227 1
7 2227 0
8 2228 1
9 2229 1
10 2230 1
11 2231 1
12 2232 1
13 2233 1
14 2233 0
15 2233 0
16 2234 1
17 2238 4 Maximum Daily Flow 1
18 2238 0
19 2240 2
20 2241 1
21 2242 1
22 2244 2
23 2245 1
24 2246 1
25 2247 1
26 2249 2
27 2250 1
28 2250 0
29 2251 1
30 2252 1
31 2254 2
Average Daily Flow 1
7~) )7
LAKE SIMCOE REGIONAL AIRPORT PUMPHOUSE - WELL #3 - PAGE 2
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max. Diy, Flow (cu,m)
31-Jan-01 2254 2
February
1 2256 2
2 2257 1
3 2259 2
4 2261 2
5 2261 0
6 2261 0
7 2263 2
8 2268 5 Maximum Daily Flow I
9 2269 1
10 2270 1
11 2271 1
12 2272 1
13 2272 0
14 2273 1
15 2273 0
16 2274 1
17 2275 1
18 2276 1
19 2276 0
20 2277 1
21 2277 0
22 2278 1
23 2280 2
24 2281 1
25 2282 1
26 2283 1
27 2284 1
28 2284 0
Average Daily Flow 1
7 ~) } X-
I ,-'
LAKE SIMCOE REGIONAL AIRPORT PUMPHOUSE - WELL #3 - PAGE 3
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max. Diy. Flow (cu,m)
28-Feb-01 2284 0
March
1 2284 0
2 2285 1
3 2285 0
4 2286 1
5 2286 0
6 2286 0
7 2288 2
8 2288 0
9 2289 1
10 2289 0
11 2290 1
12 2291 1
13 2296 5 Maximum Daily Flow 1
14 2299 3
15 2300 1
16 2305 5
17 2305 0
18 2305 0
19 2306 1
20 2306 0
21 2307 1
22 2310 3
23 2311 1
24 2311 0
25 2311 0
26 2311 0
27 2312 1
28 2312 0
29 2313 1
30 2313 0
31 2313 0
Average Daily Flow 1
f~) I~
LAKE SIMCOE REGIONAL AIRPORT PUMPHOUSE - WELL #3 - PAGE 4
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max. Diy. Flow (cu,m)
31-Mar-01 2313 0
April
1 2313 0
2 2314 1 Maximum Daily Flow 1
3 2314 0
4 2315 1
5 2315 0
6 2315 0
7 2315 0
8 2316 1
9 2316 0
10 2316 0
11 2317 1
12 2317 0
13 2317 0
14 2317 0
15 2318 1
16 2318 0
17 2318 0
18 2319 1
19 2319 0
20 2320 1
21 2320 0
22 2320 0
23 2321 1
24 2321 0
25 2322 1
26 2322 0
27 2323 1
28 2323 0
29 2323 0
30 2324 1
Average Daily Flow 0
7 ;... ) ;Zb
LAKE SIMCOE REGIONAL AIRPORT PUMPHOUSE - WELL #3 - PAGE 5
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max, Diy, Flow (cu.m)
30-Apr-01 2324 1
May
1 2324 0
2 2324 0
3 2324 0
4 2325 1
5 2325 0
6 2327 2 Maximum Daily Flow 1
7 2328 1
8 2328 0
9 2329 1
10 2329 0
11 2330 1
12 2330 0
13 2331 1
14 2331 0
15 2332 1
16 2332 0
17 2332 0
18 2332 0
19 2333 1
20 2333 0
21 2333 0
22 2334 1
23 2334 0
24 2336 2
25 2337 1
26 2337 0
27 2338 1
28 2339 1
29 2340 1
30 2340 0
31 2341 1
Average Daily Flow 1
7~)~1
LAKE SIMCOE REGIONAL AIRPORT PUMPHOUSE - WELL #3 - PAGE 6
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max. Diy, Flow (cu,m)
31-May-01 2341 1
June
1 2341 0
2 2341 0
3 2341 0
4 2342 1
5 2343 1
6 2343 0
7 2344 1
8 2344 0
9 2344 0
10 2345 1
11 2347 2 Maximum Daily Flow I
12 2348 1
13 2348 0
14 2349 1
15 2350 1
16 2350 0
17 2350 0
18 2351 1
19 2352 1
20 2353 1
21 2354 1
22 2354 0
23 2354 0
24 2355 1
25 2356 1
26 2356 0
27 2357 1
28 2359 2
29 2359 0
30 2360 1
Average Daily Flow 1
l~)
r"\ .....
) {
"'" ""'"
LAKE SIMCOE REGIONAL AIRPORT PUMPHOUSE - WELL #3 - PAGE 7
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max, Diy. Flow (cu,m)
30-Jun-01 2360 1
July
1 2360 0
2 2360 0
3 2360 0
4 2360 0
5 2361 1
6 2362 1
7 2363 1
8 2365 2
9 2367 2
10 2368 1
11 2369 1
12 2370 1
13 2371 1
14 2373 2
15 2375 2
16 2377 2
17 2378 1
18 2379 1
19 2380 1
20 2382 2
21 2384 2
22 2388 4 Maximum Daily Flow I
23 2392 4
24 2394 2
25 2394 0
26 2395 1
27 2398 3
28 2402 4
29 2406 4
30 2410 4
31 2414 4
Average Daily Flow 2
7~)~
LAKE SIMCOE REGIONAL AIRPORT PUMPHOUSE - WELL #3 - PAGE 8
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max, Diy. Flow (cu,m)
31-Jul-01 2414 4
August
1 2424 10 Maximum Daily Flow I
2 2431 7
3 2433 2
4 2439 6
5 2446 7
6 2453 7
7 2462 9
8 2465 3
9 2467 2
10 2471 4
11 2472 1
12 2474 2
13 2481 7
14 2484 3
15 2484 0
16 2486 2
17 2490 4
18 2490 0
19 2490 0
20 2490 0
21 2491 1
22 2491 0
23 2492 1
24 2493 1
25 2493 0
26 2493 0
27 2494 1
28 2494 0
29 2494 0
30 2495 1
31 2496 1
Average Daily Flow 3
~ - \.., ~
I ...J..-. } r;( 4-
LAKE SIMCOE REGIONAL AIRPORT PUMPHOUSE - WELL #3 - PAGE 9
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max, Diy. Flow (cu.m)
31-Aug-G1 2496 1
Sept,
1 2496 0
2 2496 0
3 2496 0
4 2497 1 Maximum Daily Flow 1
5 2497 0
6 2498 1
7 2499 1
8 2500 1
9 2500 0
10 2500 0
11 2501 1
12 2501 0
13 2502 1
14 2502 0
15 2503 1
16 2503 0
17 2504 1
18 2504 0
19 2504 0
20 2505 1
21 2506 1
22 2506 0
23 2506 0
24 2506 0
25 2507 1
26 2507 0
27 2508 1
28 2508 0
29 2508 0
30 2509 1
Average Daily Flow 0
7~)2S
LAKE SIMCOE REGIONAL AIRPORT PUMPHOUSE - WELL #3 - PAGE 10
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max, Diy. Flow (cu.m)
30-Sep-01 2509 1
October
1 2510 1 Maximum Daily Flow)
2 2510 0
3 2511 1
4 2511 0
5 2512 1
6 2513 1
7 2513 0
8 2514 1
9 2514 0
10 2514 0
11 2515 1
12 2515 0
13 2516 1
14 2516 0
15 2517 1
16 2517 0
17 2518 1
18 2519 1
19 2519 0
20 2519 0
21 2520 1
22 2521 1
23 2521 0
24 2522 1
25 2522 0
26 2523 1
27 2524 1
28 2524 0
29 2525 1
30 2525 0
31 2526 1
Average Daily Flow 1
7 ~ ) ~b
LAKE SIMCOE REGIONAL AIRPORT PUMPHOUSE - WELL #3 - PAGE 11
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max, Diy, Flow (cu,m)
31-0ct-01 2526 1
November
1 2527 1
2 2527 0
3 2528 1
4 2528 0
5 2529 1
6 2529 0
7 2530 1
8 2530 0
9 2531 1
10 2531 0
11 2532 1
12 2532 0
13 2533 1
14 2533 0
15 2534 1
16 2535 1
17 2536 1
18 2537 1
19 2538 1
20 2539 1
21 2539 0
22 2540 1
23 2541 1
24 2541 0
25 2542 1
26 2542 0
27 2551 9 Maximum Daily Flow 1
28 2551 0
29 2552 1
30 2552 0
Average Daily Flow 1
7~)~7
LAKE SIMCOE REGIONAL AIRPORT PUMPHOUSE - WELL #3 - PAGE 12
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max, Diy, Flow (cu.m)
30-Nov-01 2552 0
December
1 2554 2 Maximum Daily Flow I
2 2555 1
3 2557 2
4 2558 1
5 2559 1
6 2561 2
7 2561 0
8 2562 1
9 2563 1
10 2563 0
11 2564 1
12 2565 1
13 2566 1
14 2567 1
15 2568 1
16 2569 1
17 2570 1
18 2570 0
19 2571 1
20 2573 2
21 2574 1
22 2575 1
23 2576 1
24 2577 1
25 2577 0
26 2578 1
27 2579 1
28 2580 I 1
29 2581 1
30 2582 1
31 2583 1
Average Daily Flow 1
7h} ~~
REPORT
, \
7-1) I
,
v
DEPT. REPORT TO: Council PREPARED BY: .
#ES2002-21 Keith Mathieson
SUBJECT & FILE #: DEPARTMENT:
COUNCIL:
Annual Performance Report - Public Works
Maplewood Water Supply and
C. OF W. Treatment for 2001
MOTION #: DATE:
DATE: March 22, 2002
BACKGROUN
The Township has received the new Certificates of Approval (C, of A's) issued by the Ministry of the
Environment for all the water systems, Section 4 of the C, of A, Compliance Report, requires a
written report detailing that compliance with all terms and conditions of the approval be completed
annually, This Report is to be signed by a person designated by Council of the municipality that owns
the works and a resolution is to be presented to Council that the compliance report has been
received,
This first Compliance Report is due by March 31,2003,
SUMMARY:
Attached is Maplewood's Annual Performance Report for 2001, which was submitted to the Ministry
of the Environment. This Report was structured to comply with next year's Compliance Report and is
being made available to Council for information and confirmation that Ontario Regulation #459/00 is
being complied with by the Township of Oro-Medonte.
RECOM!\IENDA TION
1, THAT Council receives and adopts this report,
2, THAT Council designates the Director of Engineering and Environmental Services as the signing
authority for the Compliance Report.
3. THAT the Annual Performance Report for Maplewood Water Supply and Treatment 2001 be
receiv \for information,
I
tfull submitted,
"---
Keith Mathieson
~~
~
7j ) 2.
C.A.O. COMMENTS:
DATE:
C.A.O.:
DEPT. HEAD:
THE CORPORA TlON OF THE
7j) 3
~
148 Line 7 5.. Box 100
Ora. Ontario LOL 2.X0
TOWNSlIIP
-&/V-~-:;16~
Phone (705) 487-2171
Fax (705) 487-0133 .
www.township.oro-medonte.on.ca
March 11, 2002
Ministry of the Environment
54 Cedar Pointe Drive
Unit #1203
BARRIE, Ontario
L4N 5R7
Re: Maplewood Water Supply and Treatment
Annual Performance Report for 2001
Dear Sir:
Permit to Take Water #93-P-3058 was issued to the Township of Oro-Medonte on July
29, 1993 for Well PW#1, expiring on March 31, 2003, permitting 164 m3 of water taken
per day.
The Maplewood water system supplies 44 homes with water.
WA TER QUANTITY
Schedules have been attached showing the "average daily flow" per month and the
"maximum daily flow" per month for the Maplewood system. On July 20th, July 26th,
August 3rd and August 24th, the Permit to Take Water was exceeded. A service
connection to house #31 Maplewood Parkway was repaired at the location where the
service entered the house on September 6, 2001, At no time after the repair to the
water service was the Permit to Take Water exceeded.
WATER QUALITY
Bacteriological samples were taken weekly by Township operators and submitted to the
Central Ontario Analytical Laboratory in Orillia. Two hundred (200) samples were tested
for "total coliforms" and "fecal coliforms" in 2001 and no detectable results were found,
. , ./2
'"
71)V-
v
Page Two
Letter to M.O.E,
Re: Maplewood - Annual Performance Report for 2001
March 11, 2002
To ensure that the free chlorine residual was maintained above 0.2 mglL in the
distribution system, and a free chlorine residual was available in the distribution system,
12% Sodium Hypochlorite was pumped into the system. A total of 280 litres of 12%
Sodium Hypochlorite was used in the Maplewood system in 2001.
Daily tests for free chlorine in the treatment plant and in the distribution system were
performed by Township operators using a "Hack Pocket Colorimeter",
Daily tests for turbidity were performed by Township operators using a "Hack Pocket
Turbidity Meter".
Quarterly water quality analyses sampling was performed by Geospec Engineering Ltd.
in order to satisfy testing parameters for treated water as per Regulation #459/00,
Samples were forwarded to Lakefield Research Limited for chemical testing.
The chemical results did not reveal any health related, reportable exceedences during
2001,
Mr, Fred MacGregor, Environmental Foreman of the Township of Oro-Medonte,
performed a calibration test on the existing water meter on May 19, 2001 and it was
calibrated at ,62%, which is well within Ministry of Environment guidelines,
If you require any further information with regards to the Maplewood water system,
please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at (705) 487-6499,
Sincerely,
T~O-M~DONTE
Keith Mathieson, C.R.S.I.
Director of Engineering and Environmental Services
KM/ps
Attachments
MAPLEWOODPUMPHOUSE-PAGE1
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max. Diy, Flow (cu,m)
January
1 4074
2 4173 99
3 4267 94
4 4362 95
5 4455 93
6 4526 71
7 4626 100
8 4725 99
9 4809 84
10 4896 87
11 4977 81
12 5075 98
13 5154 79
14 5252 98
15 5354 102
16 5432 78
17 5522 90
18 5622 100
19 5678 56
20 5759 81
21 5867 108 Maximum Daily Flow I
22 5970 103
23 6055 85
24 6147 92
25 6240 93
26 6327 87
27 6409 82
28 6492 83
29 6594 102
30 6683 89
31 6774 91
Average Daily Flow 90
7-,/)5
v
MAPLEWOODPUMPHOUSE.PAGE2
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max, Diy, Flow (cu,m)
31-Jan-01 6774 91
February
1 6859 85
2 6955 96
3 7039 84
4 7126 87
5 7234 108
6 7312 78
7 7410 98
8 7491 81
9 7570 79
10 7656 86
11 7746 90
12 7840 94
13 7919 79
14 8008 89
15 8107 99
16 8184 77
17 8271 87
18 8358 87
19 8441 83
20 8537 96
21 8619 82
22 8715 96
23 8789 74
24 8859 70
25 8947 88
26 9066 119 Maximum Daily Flow 1
27 9134 68
28 9216 82
Average Daily Flow 87
7-1) It;
J
MAPLEWOOD PUMPHOUSE - PAGE 3
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max. Diy. Flow (cu.m)
28-Feb-01 9216 82
March
1 9303 87
2 9398 95
3 9485 87
4 9571 86
5 9665 94
6 9746 81
7 9842 96
8 9926 84
9 10016 90
10 10081 65
11 10178 97
12 10271 93
13 10356 85
14 10447 91
15 10532 85
16 10621 89
17 10704 83
18 10789 85
19 10887 98
20 10960 73
21 11070 110
22 11129 59
23 11247 118 Maximum Daily Flow')
24 11328 81
25 11419 91
26 11511 92
27 11579 68
28 11674 95
29 11766 92
30 11855 89
31 11930 75
Average Daily Flow 88
71) 7
-.J
MAPLEWOOD PUMPHOUSE - PAGE 4
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max. Diy, Flow (cu,m)
31-Mar-G1 11930 75
April
1 12020 90
2 12127 107
3 12213 86
4 12296 83
5 12389 93
6 12486 97
7 12563 77
8 12639 76
9 12777 138 Maximum Daily Flow I
10 12851 74
11 12934 83
12 13019 85
13 13107 88
14 13185 78
15 13272 87
16 13381 109
17 13469 88
18 13548 79
19 13645 97
20 13734 89
21 13812 78
22 13897 85
23 14014 117
24 14098 84
25 14189 91
26 14288 99
27 14367 79
28 14452 85
29 14555 103
30 14649 94
Average Daily Flow 91
7~) ~
J
MAPLEWOOD PUMPHOUSE - PAGE 5
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max. Diy. Flow (cu.m)
30-Apr-G1 14649 94
May
1 14725 76
2 14821 96
3 14935 114
4 15025 90
5 15108 83
6 15215 107
7 15340 125 Maximum Daily Flow I
8 15453 113
9 1554 7 94
10 15623 76
11 15742 119
12 15832 90
13 15922 90
14 16021 99
15 16110 89
16 16212 102
17 16308 96
18 16398 90
19 16475 77
20 16589 114
21 16690 101
22 16799 109
23 16889 90
24 16992 103
25 17093 101
26 17200 107
27 17306 106
28 17400 94
29 17496 96
30 17589 93
31 17693 104
Average Daily Flow 98
71) ~
-....J
MAPLEWOOD PUMP HOUSE - PAGE 6
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max. Diy, Flow (cu.m)
31-May-01 17693 104
June
1 17786 93
2 17870 84
3 17961 91
4 18079 118
5 18159 80
6 18252 93
7 18365 113
8 18462 97
9 18561 99
10 18659 98
11 18762 103
12 18866 104
13 18957 91
14 19076 119
15 19177 101
16 19282 105
17 19386 104
18 19510 124
19 19623 113
20 19757 134
21 19840 83
22 19943 103
23 20053 110
24 20138 85
25 20272 134 Maximum Daily Flow I
26 20358 86
27 20487 129
28 20617 130
29 20734 117
30 20849 115
Average Daily Flow 105
7j ) /0
MAPLEWOODPUMPHOUSE-PAGE7
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max, Diy. Flow (cu.m)
30-Jun-01 20849 115
July
1 20952 103
2 21051 99
3 21163 112
4 21279 116
5 21340 61
6 21429 89
7 21529 100
8 21630 101
9 21763 133
10 21908 145
11 22000 92
12 22141 141
13 22262 121
14 22401 139
15 22540 139
16 22695 155
17 22819 124
18 22934 115
19 23022 88
20 23197 175 Maximum Daily Flow I
21 23289 92
22 23397 108
23 23521 124
24 23612 91
25 23695 83
26 23869 174
27 23958 89
28 24096 138
29 24234 138
30 24371 137
31 24486 115
Average Daily Flow 117
7 ~ ) J I
I
I
......
MAPLEWOOD PUMPHOUSE - PAGE 8
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max. Diy. Flow (cu,m)
31-Jul-Q1 24486 115
August
1 24648 162
2 24744 96
3 24941 197 Maximum Daily Flow I
4 25075 134
5 25209 134
6 25343 134
7 25501 158
8 25620 119
9 25774 154
10 25911 137
11 26007 96
12 26137 130
13 26274 137
14 26381 107
15 26507 126
16 26646 139
17 26724 78
18 26840 116
19 26955 115
20 27060 105
21 27147 87
22 27247 100
23 27370 123
24 27548 178
25 27622 74
26 27695 73
27 27779 84
28 27889 110
29 27978 89
30 28089 111
31 28180 91
Average Daily Flow 119
11 )
I
V
j'J
I/.-
MAPLEWOOD PUMPHOUSE . PAGE 9
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS. 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max. Diy. Flow (cu,m)
31-Aug-Q1 28180 91
September
1 28277 97
2 28383 106
3 28496 113
4 28623 127
5 28720 97
6 28816 96
*FOUND LEAK ON
MAPLEWOOD DR, .
FLOWS ARE DOWN*
7 28863 47
8 28904 41
9 28946 42
10 29041 95
11 29081 40
*GAS COMPANY HIT
WATER SERVICE*
12 29124 43
13 29172 48
14 29215 43
ANOTHER WATER
SERVICE HIT BY GAS CO.
15 29299 84
16 29389 90
17 29527 138
18 29616 89
19 29731 115
20 29830 99
21 29934 104
22 30016 82
23 30098 82
24 30237 139 Maximum Daily Flow I
25 30339 102
26 30421 82
27 30538 117
28 30630 92
29 30722 92
30 30823 101
Average Daily Flow 88
7J) 1-3
MAPLEWOOD PUMPHOUSE . PAGE 10
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max. Diy, Flow (cu.m)
30-Sep-01 30823 101
October
1 30947 124
2 31026 79
3 31143 117
4 31226 83
5 31343 117
6 31436 93
7 31531 95
8 31649 118
9 31790 141 Maximum Daily Flow I
10 31878 88
11 31995 117
12 32087 92
13 32172 85
14 32256 84
15 32373 117
16 32494 121
17 32579 85
18 32666 87
19 32789 123
20 32885 96
21 32981 96
22 33084 103
23 33170 86
24 33277 107
25 33371 94
26 33469 98
27 33565 96
28 33655 90
29 33780 125
30 33881 101
31 33968 87
Average Daily Flow 101
\
71))1
1 i
"""
MAPLEWOOD PUMPHOUSE - PAGE 11
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max. Diy. Flow (cu.m)
31-Oct-G1 33968 87
November
1 34131 163 Maximum Daily Flow I
*FLUSHING
WATER MAINS*
2 34181 50
3 34270 89
4 34360 90
5 34478 118
6 34571 93
7 34681 110
8 34779 98
9 34868 89
10 34964 96
11 35065 101
12 35138 73
13 35195 57
14 35220 25
15 35254 34
16 35283 29
17 35314 31
18 35346 32
19 35374 28
20 35398 24
21 35435 37
22 35464 29
23 35490 26
24 35525 35
25 35540 15
26 35573 33
27 35609 36
28 35623 14
29 35655 32
30 35681 26
Average Daily Flow 57
7.j )J5
I
--
MAPLEWOOD PUMPHOUSE. PAGE 12
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max. Diy, Flow (cu.m)
30-Nov-01 35681 26
December
1 35699 18
2 35747 48 Maximum Daily Flow I
3 35763 16
4 35790 27
5 35814 24
6 35838 24
7 35864 26
8 35889 25
9 35923 34
10 35954 31
11 35979 25
12 36003 24
13 36026 23
14 36042 16
15 36090 48
16 36114 24
17 36134 20
18 36160 26
19 36194 34
20 36217 23
21 36239 22
22 36258 19
23 36297 39
24 36342 45
25 36380 38
26 36423 43
27 36441 18
28 36475 34
29 36494 19
30 36533 39
31 36562 29
Average Daily Flow 28
7 i) J ~
\J
7 A) I
REPORT
DEPT. REPORT TO: Council PREPARED BY: .
#ES2002-22 Keith Mathieson
SUBJECT & FILE #: DEPARTMENT:
COUNCIL:
Annual Performance Report - Public Works
Medonte Hills Water Supply
C. OF W. and ~rreatment for 2001
MOTION #: DATE:
DATE: March 22, 2002
The Township has received the new Certificates of Approval (C, of A.'s) issued by the Ministry of the
Environment for all the water systems, Section 4 of the C, of A, Compliance Report, requires a
written report detailing that compliance with all terms and conditions of the approval be completed
annually, This Report is to be signed by a person designated by Council of the municipality that owns
the works and a resolution is to be presented to Council that the compliance report has been
received.
This first Compliance Report is due by March 31,2003.
.ARY:
Attached is Medonte Hill's Annual Performance Report for 2001, which was submitted to the Ministry
of the Environment. This Report was structured to comply with next year's Compliance Report and is
being made available to Council for information and confirmation that Ontario Regulation #459/00 is
being complied with by the Township of Oro-Medonte.
RE€,()MM EN DATION
1. THAT Council receives and adopts this report.
2, THAT Council designates the Director of Engineering and Environmental Services as the signing
authority for the Compliance Report.
3, THAT the Annual Performance Report for Medonte Hills Water Supply and Treatment 2001 be
received for information,
.....
Keith Mathieson
()J../--
~
57
7J::)~
C.A.O. COMMENTS:
DATE:
C.A.O.:
DEPT. HEAD:
7/\ ) 3
THE CORPORATION OF THE
148 Line 7 S., Box 100 .
Oro. Ontario LOL 2XO
TOWN~liIP
r!!J/Vor716~
Phone (705)487-2171.
fax (70S) 487-0133
www.rownship.oro-medonte.on.ca
March 11, 2002
Ministry of the Environment
54 Cedar Pointe Drive
Unit #1203
BARRIE, Ontario
L4N 5R7
Re: Medonte Hills Water Supply and Treatment
Annual Performance Report for 2001
Dear Sir:
Permit to Take Water Renewal #92-P-3029 for Well #'s 1 and 2 was issued to the
Township of Oro-Medonte on December 18, 2001, expiring on December 15, 2011,
permitting 327m3 for Well #1 and 393 m3 for Well #2, of water to be taken per day.
The Medonte Hills water system supplies 131 homes with water,
WA TER QUANTITY
Schedules have been attached showing the "average daily flow" per month and the
"maximum daily flow" per month for the Medonte Hills system, At no time during 2001
did the "maximum daily flow" exceed the Permit to Take Water.
WA TER QUALITY
Bacteriological samples were taken weekly by Township operators and submitted to the
Central Ontario Analytical Laboratory in Orillia, Two hundred and thirty-three (233)
samples were tested for "total coliforms" and "fecal coliforms" in 2001. Two (2) test
results during the year had reportable counts of "total coliforms", MOEE Spills Action
Centre and the Simcoe County District Health Unit were notified and resampies were
taken, No further action was required.
. . ./2
7);) ~
{
Page Two
Letter to M,O.E.
Re: Medonte Hills - Annual Performance Report for 2001
March 11, 2002
To ensure that the free chlorine res.idual was maintained above 0,2 mg/L in the
distribution system, and a free chlorine residual was available in the distribution system,
12% Sodium Hypochlorite was pumped into the system. A total of 100 litres of 12%
Sodium Hypochlorite was used in the Medonte Hills system in 2001,
Daily tests for free chlorine in the treatment plant and in the distribution system were
performed by Township operators using a "Hack Pocket Colorimeter",
Daily tests for turbidity were performed by Township operators using a "Hack Pocket
Turbidity Meter",
Quarterly water quality analyses sampling was performed by Geospec Engineering Ltd.
in order to satisfy testing parameters for treated water as per Regulation #459/00.
Samples were forwarded to Lakefield Research Limited for chemical testing,
The chemical results did not reveal any health related, reportable exceedences during
2001.
Mr. Fred MacGregor, Environmental Foreman of the Township of Oro-Medonte,
performed a calibration test on the existing water meters on June 6, 2001 and they were
calibrated at:
.:. Well #1 - ,64%
.:. Well #2 - .58%, which is well within Ministry of Environment guidelines,
If you require any further information with regards to the Medonte Hills water system,
please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at (705) 487-6499,
Sincerely,
ORO-MEDONTE
Keith Mathieson, C,R.S,I.
Director of Engineering and Environmental Services
KM/ps
Attachments
7Jrj
c:
.......
MEDONTE HILLS PUMP HOUSE . WELL #1 . PAGE 1
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS. 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max. Dlv. Flow (cu.m)
January
1 104364
2 104390 26
3 104415 25
4 104443 28
5 104475 32
6 104506 31
7 104539 33
8 104573 34
9 104602 29
10 104628 26
11 104654 26
12 104675 21
13 104699 24
14 104731 32
15 104774 43 Maximum Daily Flow I
16 104801 27
17 104824 23
18 104846 22
19 104870 24
20 104897 27
21 104932 35
22 104971 39
23 105001 30
24 105026 25
25 105041 15
26 105071 30
27 105094 23
28 105123 29
29 105159 36
30 105192 33
31 105216 24
Average Daily Flow 28
7 k)
I
b
MEDONTE HILLS PUMPHOUSE . WELL #1 . PAGE 2
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS. 2001
Date Flow Readina (cu.m) Max. Dlv. Flow (cu.m)
31.Jan..o1 105216 24
Februarv
1 105240 24
2 105266 26
3 105294 28
4 105325 31
5 105358 33
6 105378 20
7 105411 33
8 105438 27
9 105466 28
10 105488 22
11 105518 30
12 105562 44 Maximum Daily Flow I
13 105588 26
14 105616 28
15 105643 27
16 105667 24
17 105700 33
18 105733 33
19 105764 31
20 105797 33
21 105829 32
22 105854 25
23 105876 22
24 105897 21
25 105936 39
26 105976 40
27 106008 32
28 106034 26
Average Daily Flow 29
7 f\ J
I
I
MEDONTE HILLS PUMPHOUSE - WELL #1 - PAGE 3
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Readina Icu.m\ Max. Dlv. Flow (cu.m)
28-Feb-01 106034 26
March
1 106053 19
2 106082 29 .
3 106115 33
4 106148 33
5 106184 36
6 106214 30
7 106243 29
8 106271 28
9 106296 25
10 106319 23
11 106357 38
12 106397 40
13 106436 39
14 106463 27
15 106489 26
16 106530 41 Maximum Daily Flow I
17 106550 20
18 106580 30
19 106618 38
20 106646 28
21 106667 21
22 106698 31
23 106725 27
24 106755 30
25 106794 39
26 106828 34
27 106853 25
28 106881 28
29 106910 29
30 106933 23
31 106957 24
Average Daily Flow 30
7k) q
MEDONTE HILLS PUMPHOUSE . WELL #1 . PAGE 4
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS. 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max. Diy. Flow (cu.m\
I
I 31-Mar..Q1 106957 24 I
April
1 106991 34
2 107032 41
3 107062 30
4 107090 28
5 107103 13
6 107138 35
7 107172 34
8 107206 34
9 107239 33
10 107270 31
11 107299 29
12 107323 24
13 107344 21
14 107378 34
15 107409 31
16 107442 33
17 107490 48
18 107501 11
19 107550 49 Maximum Daily Flow J
20 107573 23
21 107606 33
22 107645 39
23 107676 31
24 107712 36
25 107742 30
26 107763 21
27 107802 39
28 107836 34
29 107877 41
30 107907 30
Average Daily Flow 32
7t\) ~
MEDONTE HILLS PUMPHOUSE . WELL #1 . PAGE 5
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS. 2001
Date Flow ReadinQ leu.mll Max. Dlv. Flow (eu.m)
!
30.Apr-01 107907 30
Mav
1 107951 44
2 107981 30
3 108006 25
4 108039 33
5 108069 30
6 108104 35
7 108151 47
8 108164 13
9 108214 50 Maximum Daily Flow I
10 108246 32
11 108285 39
12 108325 40
13 108341 16
14 108387 46
15 108423 36
16 108444 21
17 108482 38
18 108510 28
19 108540 30
20 108579 39
21 108600 21
22 108630 30
23 108660 30
24 108689 29
25 108722 33
26 108754 32
27 108786 32
28 108827 41
29 108866 39
30 108895 29
31 108928 33
Average Daily Flow 33
If\) )D
MEDONTE HILLS PUMPHOUSE . WELL #1 . PAGE 6
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS. 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max. Diy. Flow (cu.ml
31-Mav-01 108928 33
June
1 108940 12
2 108974 34
3 109004 30
4 109048 44
5 109081 33
6 109141 60
7 109163 22
8 109171 8
9 109214 43
10 109257 43
11 109322 65
12 109413 91 Maximum Daily Flow 1
13 109453 40
14 109481 28
15 109548 67
16 109582 34
17 109614 32
18 109634 20
19 109679 45
20 109720 41
21 109755 35
22 109782 27
23 109825 43
24 109870 45
25 109907 37
26 109937 30
27 109963 26
28 110006 43
29 110027 21
30 110044 17
Average Daily Flow 37
71\) II
MEDONTE HILLS PUMPHOUSE - WELL #1 - PAGE 7
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m Max. Dlv. Flow (cu.m\
30-Jun..o1 110044 17
July I
1 I 110073 29
2 I 110116 43
110141 25
4 110195 54
5 110223 28
6 110260 37
7 110290 30
8 110320 30
9 110374 54
10 110393 19
11 110427 34
12 110476 49
13 110499 23
14 110528 29
15 110557 29
16 110580 23
17 110613 33
18 110651 38
19 110689 38
20 110734 45
21 110777 43
22 110806 29
23 110815 9
24 110825 10
25 110859 34
26 110907 48
27 110999 92 Maximum Daily Flow I
28 111009 10
29 111039 30
30 111067 28
31 111137 70
Average Daily Flow 35
7k) /2-
MEDONTE HILLS PUMP HOUSE . WELL #1 . PAGE 8
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS. 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max. Dlv. Flow (cu.m\
31..Jul-01 111137 70
AUQust
1 111207 70
2 111277 70
3 111348 71
4 111475 127
5 111601 126
6 111729 128 Maximum Daily Flow I
7 111805 76
8 111875 70
9 111931 56
10 112057 126
11 112109 52
12 112168 59
13 112283 115
14 112307 24
15 112365 58
16 112441 76
17 112467 26
18 112502 35
19 112537 35
20 112570 33
21 112598 28
22 112633 35
23 112660 27
24 112692 32
25 112730 38
26 112770 40
27 112810 40
28 112837 27
29 112877 40
30 112913 36
31 112945 32
Average Daily Flow 58
7k) 13
MEDONTE HILLS PUMPHOUSE . WELL #1 . PAGE 9
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS. 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max, Diy. Flow (cu.m)
31.Auo..Q1 112945 32
Sept.
1 112970 25
2 113015 45
3 113048 33
4 113112 64 Maximum Daily Flow I
5 113149 37
6 113168 19
7 113205 37
8 113263 58
9 113293 30
10 113308 15
11 113340 32
12 113389 49
13 113407 18
14 113432 25
15 113465 33
16 113495 30
17 113534 39
18 113575 41
19 113600 25
20 113629 29
21 113661 32
22 113698 37
23 113737 39
24 113773 36
25 113804 31
26 113836 32
27 113866 30
28 113898 32
29 113922 24
30 113956 34
Average Daily Flow 34
7 K: ) 'f
MEDONTE HILLS PUMPHOUSE . WELL #1. PAGE 10
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS. 2001
Date Flow Readina Icu.m Max. Dlv. Flow (cu.m)
30-Sep-01 113956 34
October
1 113999 43
2 114037 38
3 114062 25
4 114094 32
5 114116 22
6 114147 31
7 114179 32
8 114196 17
9 114239 43
10 114276 37
11 114339 63 Maximum Daily Flow I
12 114363 24
13 114395 32
14 114424 29
15 114464 40
16 114496 32
17 114526 30
18 114553 27
19 114583 30
20 114616 33
21 114650 34
22 114687 37
23 114717 30
24 114742 25
25 114769 27
26 114797 28
27 114828 31
28 114858 30
29 114905 47
30 114938 33
31 114971 33
Average Daily Flow 33
7 k) 15
MEDONTE HILLS PUMPHOUSE. WELL #1. PAGE 11
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS. 2001
Date Flow Readina Icu.m} Max. Dlv. Flow (cu.m)
31.oct..o1 114971 33
November
1 114992 21
2 115011 19
3 115050 39 ,
4 115085 35
5 115124 39
6 115156 32
7 115179 23
8 115206 27
9 115244 38
10 115270 26
11 115303 33
12 115342 39
13 115366 24
14 115409 43
15 115435 26
16 115458 23
17 115486 28
18 115514 28
19 115561 47 Maximum Daily Flow I
20 115602 41
21 115613 11
22 115640 27
23 115666 26
24 115679 13
25 115687 8
26 115701 14
27 115736 35 M.O.E. . PLEASE NOTE: PLEASE BE ADVISED
28 115771 35 THAT DUE TO THE FAILURE OF THE INTERNAL
29 115806 35 COMPONENTS OF WELL #1 FLOW METER. WE
30 115841 35 HAD TO AVERAGE DAILY FLOWS FOR ONE WEEK
UNTIL NEW CHAMBER FOR METER WAS
Average Daily Flow 29 RECEIVED. RECEIVED METER IN A WEEK. BUT
THE WRONG CHAMBER WAS SHIPPED AND HAD
TO REORDER. THIS AFFECTED THE PERIOD
NOVEMBER 27TH TO DECEMBER 31, 2001.
7/\ )
I J
/k
MEDONTE HILLS PUMPHOUSE . WELL #1. PAGE 12
MAXIMUM CAlLY FLOWS. 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max. Dlv. Flow (cu.m)
30-Nov~1 115841 35
December
1 115876 35 Maximum Daily Flow I
2 115911 35
3 115946 35
4 115981 35
5 116016 35
6 116051 35
7 116086 35
8 116121 35
9 116156 35
10 116191 35
11 116226 35
12 116261 35
13 116296 35
14 116331 35
15 116366 35
16 116401 35
17 116436 35
18 116471 35
19 116506 35
20 116541 35
21 116576 35
22 116611 35
23 116646 35
24 116681 35
25 116716 35
26 116751 35
27 116786 35
28 116821 35
29 116856 35
30 116891 35
31 116926 35
Average Daily Flow 35
1 f\) 17
MEDONTE HILLS PUMPHOUSE. WELL #2. PAGE 1
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS. 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max. Diy. Flow (cu.m)
January
1 30940
2 30977 37
3 31006 29
4 31036 30
5 31065 29
6 31098 33
7 31137 39
8 31182 45
9 31215 33
10 31242 27
11 31269 27
12 31291 22
13 31317 26
14 31349 32
15 31395 46 Maximum Daily Flow I
16 31423 28
17 31450 27
18 31475 25
19 31498 23
20 31528 30
21 31564 36
22 31604 40
23 31637 33
24 31665 28
25 31689 24
26 31715 26
27 31740 25
28 31773 33
29 31818 45
30 31850 32
31 31878 28
Average Daily Flow 31
7/\ 1&
,
MEDONTE HILLS PUMP HOUSE . WELL #2 . PAGE 2
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS. 2001
Date Flow Reading leu.m) Max. Dlv. Flow leu.ml
31-Jan..o1 31878 28
Februarv
1 31902 24
2 31929 27
3 31963 34
4 31999 36
5 32038 39
6 32074 36
7 32101 27
8 32129 28
9 32159 30
10 32196 37
11 32221 25
12 32275 54
13 32304 29
14 32336 32
15 32356 20
16 32392 36
17 32430 38
18 32467 37
19 32500 33
20 32547 47
21 32582 35
22 32611 29
23 32636 25
24 32649 13
25 32708 59 Maximum Daily Flow I
26 32761 53
27 32798 37
28 32826 28
Average Daily Flow 34
7KJlcr
MEDONTE HILLS PUMP HOUSE - WELL #2 - PAGE 3
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max. Diy. Flow (cu.m)
28-Feb-D1 32826 28
March
1 32844 18
2 32882 38
3 32923 41
4 32963 40
5 33001 38
6 33035 34
7 33065 30
8 33096 31
9 33128 32
10 33157 29
11 33198 41
12 33257 59 Maximum Daily Flow I
13 33298 41
14 33329 31
15 33359 30
16 33404 45
17 33433 29
18 33475 42
19 33520 45
20 33553 33
21 33579 26
22 33616 37
23 33645 29
24 33671 26
25 33712 41
26 33756 44
27 33789 33
28 33820 31
29 33851 31
30 33876 25
31 33898 22
Average Daily Flow 35
7 k) ~O
4' I
MEDONTE HillS PUMP HOUSE . WEll #2 . PAGE 4
MAXIMUM DAilY FLOWS. 2001
Date Flow Readina (cu.m) Max. Dlv. Flow (cu.ml
31-Mar..()1 33898 22
April
1 33939 41
2 33990 51
3 34025 35
4 34056 31
5 34084 28
6 34109 25
7 34148 39
8 34188 40
9 34222 34
10 34256 34
11 34284 28
12 34309 25
13 34351 42
14 34384 33
15 34418 34
16 34456 38
17 34507 51
18 34539 32
19 34571 32
20 34602 31
21 34638 36
22 34679 41
23 34743 64 Maximum Daily Flow I
24 34786 43
25 34822 36
26 34854 32
27 34890 36
28 34932 42
29 34995 63
30 35049 54
Average Daily Flow 38
71\)~1
MEDONTE HILLS PUMPHOUSE . WELL #2 . PAGE 5
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS. 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max. Dlv. Flow (cu.m)
30.Apr..o1 35049 54
May
1 35108 59
2 35167 59 .
3 35237 70
4 35303 66
5 35345 42
6 35405 60
7 35502 97 Maximum Daily Flow I
8 35540 38
9 35575 35
10 35624 49
11 35664 40
12 35704 40
13 35741 37
14 35799 58
15 35646 47
16 35902 56
17 35946 44
18 35973 27
19 36009 36
20 36058 49
21 36151 93
22 36235 84
23 36272 37
24 36311 39
25 36342 31
26 36382 40
27 36423 41
28 36467 44
29 36505 38
30 36544 39
31 36576 32
Average Daily Flow 49
,
7/, ) ~ 2-
MEDONTE HILLS PUMP HOUSE . WELL #2. PAGE 6
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS. 2001
Date Flow ReadinQ (cu.m Max. Diy. Flow (cu.m)
31-May-a1 36576 32
June
1 36607 31
2 36634 27
3 36672 38
4 36726 54
5 36763 37
6 36837 74
7 36864 27
8 36879 15
9 36939 60
10 36999 60
11 37066 67
12 37090 24
13 37146 56
14 37212 66
15 37242 30
16 37301 59
17 37388 87
18 37512 124 Maximum Daily Flow I
19 37586 74
20 37625 39
21 37728 103
22 37765 37
23 37811 46
24 37857 46
25 37943 86
26 38028 85
27 38096 68
28 38176 80
29 38253 77
30 38367 114
Average Daily Flow 60
7 K) ~::
MEDONTE HILLS PUMPHOUSE . WELL #2 . PAGE 7
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS. 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max. Diy. Flow (cu.m\
30.Jun.o1 38367 114
July
1 38443 76
2 38493 50
3 38593 100 Maximum Daily Flow I
4 38643 50
5 38688 45
6 38723 35
7 38758 35
8 38794 36
9 38833 39
10 38863 30
11 38893 30
12 38922 29
13 38941 19
14 38963 22
15 39012 49
16 39057 45
17 39099 42
18 39161 62
19 39202 41
20 39234 32
21 39274 40
22 39314 40
23 39356 42
24 39389 33
25 39434 45
26 39477 43
27 39496 19
28 39538 42
29 39572 34
30 39611 39
31 39657 46
Average Daily Flow 42
11\) ~~
MEDONTE HILLS PUMPHOUSE . WELL #2 . PAGE 8
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS. 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max. Diy. Flow (cu.m)
31.Jul..o1 39657 46
AUGust
1 39698 41
2 39744 46
3 39791 47
4 39843 52
5 39872 29
6 39914 42
7 39974 60
8 40029 55
9 40062 33
10 40107 45
11 40162 55
12 40212 50
13 40263 51
14 40299 36
15 40299 0
'METER NOT
WORKING. CLEANED
& INSPECTED -
ORDERED NEW METER
16 40302 3
17 40302 0
18 40302 0
19 40302 0
20 40302 0
-INSTALLED NEW
METER CHAMBER
ON AUGUST 21ST"
21 0 0
22 20 20
23 35 15
'INSTALLED DIRECT-
READ RECEIVER ON
WELL It2 ON AUGUST
24TH - DID NOT HAVE
REGISTER THAT
STARTED AT 0000-
'USED AN AVERAGE
OF 35 cu.m FOR MAX.
DL Y. FLOW BETWEEN
AUG. 23 & AUG. 24-
2..: I 39263 35
~< 39302 39
,-
26 39342 40
L' 39379 37
~t 39448 69 Maximum Daily Flow I
29 39491 43
30 39532 41
- 39573 41
Average Dally Flow 41
7 t\ ) ~,
MEDONTE HILLS PUMPHOUSE - WELL #2 - PAGE 9
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m\ Max. Diy. Flow (cu.m)
31-Aug..Q1 39573 41
Sept,
1 39616 43
2 39672 56
3 39720 48
4 39796 76 Maximum Daily Flow 1
5 39836 40
6 39877 41
7 39920 43
8 39975 55
9 39992 17
10 40065 73
11 40105 40
12 40147 42
13 40180 33
14 40215 35
15 40244 29
16 40281 37
17 40340 59
18 40384 44
19 40417 33
20 40451 34
21 40481 30
22 40515 34
23 40550 35
24 40617 67
25 40649 32
26 40685 36
27 40716 31
28 40753 37
29 40785 32
30 40817 32
Average Daily Flow 41
7 K ) ~~
MEDONTE HILLS PUMPHOUSE - WELL #2 - PAGE 10
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Readina (cu.m\ Max. Dlv. Flow (cu.m)
30-Sep..o1 40817 32
October
1 40871 54
2 40904 33
3 40937 33
4 40967 30
5 40998 31
6 41033 35
7 41073 40
8 41119 46
9 41164 45
10 41206 42
'POWER CABLE TO
WELL #2 DAMAGED
BY BELL CONTR. -
REPAIRED ON
OCT. 11. 2001-
11 41210 4
12 41237 27
13 41267 30
14 41300 33
15 41363 63 Maximum Daily Flow 1
16 41399 36
17 41435 36
18 41469 34
19 41500 31
20 41534 34
21 41567 33
22 41626 59
23 41664 38
24 41694 30
25 41727 33
26 41756 29
27 41790 34
28 41829 39
29 41882 53
30 41916 34
31 41954 38
Average Daily Flow 37
11\ )
'j-
.....,
MEDONTE HILLS PUMPHOUSE . WELL #2. PAGE 11
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS. 2001
Date Flow Readina /cu.m\ Max. Diy. Flow (cu.m)
31..Qct.o1 41954 38
November
1 41989 35
2 42000 11
3 42049 49
4 42094 45
5 42134 40
6 42172 38
7 42191 19
8 42217 26
9 42256 39
10 42286 30
11 42319 33
12 42362 43
13 42398 36
14 42431 33
15 42461 30
16 42487 26
17 42525 38
18 42563 38
19 42608 45
20 42632 24
21 42669 37
22 42696 27
23 42726 30
24 42767 41
25 42841 74 Maximum Daily Flow 1
26 42900 59
27 42966 66
28 43013 47
29 43076 63
30 43137 61
Average Daily Flow 39
1 k ) ~f
MEDONTE HILLS PUMPHOUSE . WELL #2 . PAGE 12
MAXIMUM DAilY FLOWS. 2001
Date Flow Readina (cu.m) Max. Diy. Flow (cu.m\
30-Nov.o1 43137 61
December
1 43204 67
2 43277 73
3 43349 72
4 43422 73
5 43479 57
6 43525 46
7 43593 68
8 43646 53
9 43707 61
10 43793 86
11 43862 69
12 43916 54
13 43978 62
14 44099 121
15 44165 66
16 44238 73
17 44278 40
18 44367 89
19 44388 21
20 44410 22
21 44489 79
22 44547 58
23 44596 49
24 44632 36
25 44712 80
26 44862 150 Maximum Daily Flow I
27 44911 49
28 44996 85
29 45044 48
30 45102 58
31 45164 62
Average Daily Flow 65
REPORT
1Y-) I
DEPT. REPORT TO: Council PREPARED BY: .
#ES2002-23 Keith Mathieson
SUBJECT & FILE #: DEPARTMENT:
COUNCIL:
Annual Performance Report - Public Works
Robincrest Water Supply and
C. OF W. Treatment for 2001
MOTION #: DATE:
DATE: March 22, 2002
The Township has received the new Certificates of Approval (C, of A.'s) issued by the Ministry of the
Environment for all the water systems, Section 4 of the C, of A, Compliance Report, requires a
written report detailing that compliance with all terms and conditions of the approval be completed
annually, This Report is to be signed by a person designated by Council of the municipality that owns
the works and a resolution is to be presented to Council that the compliance report has been
received.
This first Compliance Report is due by March 31,2003,
Attached is Robincrest's Annual Performance Report for 2001, which was submitted to the Ministry of
the Environment. This Report was structured to comply with next year's Compliance Report and is
being made available to Council for information and confirmation that Ontario Regulation #459/00 is
being complied with by the Township of Oro-Medonte.
1, THAT Council receives and adopts this report.
2, THAT Council designates the Director of Engineering and Environmental Services as the signing
authority for the Compliance Report,
3, THAT the Annual Performance Report for Robincrest Water Supply and Treatment 2001 be
re for information.
Keith Mathieson
~(,l)J- .
cf7
7-2-)2
C.A.O. COMMENTS:
DATE:
C.A.O.:
DEPT. HEAD:
7-2..)3
THE CORPORATION OF THE
148 Line 7 S.. Box 100 .
Oro. Ontario LOL lXO
TOWN~fiIP
-&/V-OF7f6~
Phone (705)487-2171.
Fax (70S) 487-0133
www.township.oro-medonte.on.ca
March 11,2002
Ministry of the Environment
54 Cedar Pointe Drive, Unit #1203
BARRIE, Ontario
L4N 5R7
Re: Robincrest Water Supply and Treatment
Annual Performance Report for 2001
Dear Sir:
Permit to Take Water Renewal #77-P-3033 for Well #TW1-76 was issued to the
Township of Oro-Medonte on September 11, 2000, expiring on September 15, 2010,
allowing 576 m3 of water taken per day.
Permit to Take Water #98-P-1031 for Well #2 was issued to Bachly Investments Inc,
(Developer) on March 22, 1999, expiring on March 31, 2008, allowing 842 m3 of water
taken per day,
The Robincrest water system supplies 80 homes and has been upgraded to supply an
additional 59 lots in the Bachly Subdivision,
WATER QUANTITY
Schedules have been attached showing the "average daily flow" per month and the
"maximum daily flow" per month for the Robincrest system, On January 20th and 23rd,
2001, the new Bachly development was flooded and on August 13th, hydrants were used
by the Township's Roads Department. At no time during 2001 did the "maximum daily
flow" exceed the Permit to Take Water,
WATER QUALITY
Bacteriological samples were taken weekly by Township operators and submitted to the
Central Ontario Analytical Laboratory in Orillia. Two hundred and one (201) samples
were tested for "total coliforms" and "fecal coliforms" in 2001. One (1) test result during
the year had a reportable count of "total coliforms", MOEE Spills Action Centre and the
Simcoe County District Health Unit were notified and a resample was taken, No further
action was required.
, , ./2
7 ..Q.,) ~
,
Page Two
Letter to M,O,E,
Re: Robincrest - Annual Performance Report for 2001
March 11, 2002
To ensure that the free chlorine resi9ual was maintained above 0,2 mg/L in the
distribution system, and a free chlorine residual was available in the distribution system,
12% Sodium Hypochlorite was pumped into the system. A total of 210 litres of 12%
Sodium Hypochlorite was used in the Robincrest system in 2001,
Daily tests for free chlorine in the treatment plant and in the distribution system were
performed by Township operators using a "Hack Pocket Colorimeter",
Daily tests for turbidity were performed by Township operators using a "Hack Pocket
Turbidity Meter",
Quarterly water quality analyses sampling was performed by Geospec Engineering Ltd.
in order to satisfy testing parameters for treated water as per Regulation #459/00.
Samples were forwarded to Lakefield Research Limited for chemical testing.
The chemical results did not reveal any health related, reportable exceedences during
2001,
Mr, Fred MacGregor, Environmental Foreman of the Township of Oro-Medonte, installed
a new meter on February 4,2001,
If you require any further information with regards to the Robincrest water system,
please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at (705) 487-6499,
Sincerely,
~O:EDONTE
Keith Mathieson, C.R.S,I.
Director of Engineering and Environmental Services
KM/ps
Attachments
7.i..)5
ROBINCREST PUMPHOUSE - PAGE 1
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max. Diy, Flow (cu,m)
January
1 3801 ,
2 3887 86
3 3961 74
4 4030 69
5 4095 65
6 4162 67
7 4221 59
8 4295 74
9 4361 66
10 4420 59
11 4442 22
12 4512 70
13 4582 70
14 4647 65
15 4719 72
16 4791 72
17 4927 136
18 5106 179
19 5177 71
20 5446 269
*USED WELL TO FLOOD
NEW ZONE*
21 5527 81
22 5604 77
23 5900 296 Maximum Daily Flow I
24 6034 134
25 6169 135
26 6217 48
27 6284 67
28 6337 53
29 6419 82
30 6499 80
31 6547 48
Average Daily Flow 92
\
7!L) Ie
,
ROBINCREST PUMPHOUSE - PAGE 2
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max, Diy, Flow (cu.m)
31-Jan-01 6547 48
7
February
"FEBRUARY 1ST - #2
NEW WELL IN SERVICE"
1 6604 57
2 6669 65
3 6744 75
"NEW 6" METER
INSTALLED"
4 0
5 74 74
6 148 74
7 220 72
8 296 76
9 369 73
10 444 75
11 518 74
12 591 73
13 665 74
14 740 75
15 811 71
16 888 77 Maximum Daily Flow I
17 962 74
18 1034 72
19 1110 76
20 1183 73
21 1258 75
22 1331 73
23 1406 75
24 1479 73
25 1554 75
26 1628 74
27 1700 72
28 1773 73
Average Daily Flow 70
ROBINCREST PUMP HOUSE - PAGE 3
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max, Diy. Flow (cu.m)
28-Feb-01 1773 73
March
1 1822 49
2 1863 41
3 1928 65
4 1992 64
5 2068 76
6 2137 69
7 2194 57
8 2251 57
9 2318 67
10 2361 43
11 2425 64
12 2511 86 Maximum Daily Flow I
13 2584 73
14 2639 55
15 2690 51
16 2771 81
17 2817 46
18 2883 66
19 2965 82
20 3040 75
21 3094 54
22 3156 62
23 3220 64
24 3276 56
25 3351 75
26 3435 84
27 3490 55
28 3553 63
29 3607 54
30 3654 47
31 3692 38
Average Daily Flow 62
7 -R- ) 7
ROBINCREsT PUMP HOUSE - PAGE 4
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max, Diy, Flow (cu.m)
31-Mar-01 3692 38
April
1 3750 58
2 3829 79 Maximum Daily Flow I
3 3891 62
4 3947 56
5 4002 55
6 4046 44
7 4109 63
8 4172 63
9 4229 57
10 4292 63
11 4340 48
12 4384 44
13 4446 62
14 4497 51
15 4533 36
16 4601 68
17 4672 71
18 4724 52
19 4776 52
20 4809 33
21 4847 38
22 4896 49
23 4972 76
24 5025 53
25 5087 62
26 5164 77
27 5218 54
28 5262 44
29 5340 78
30 5414 74
Average Daily Flow 57
7.fd-\~
ROBINCREST PUMP HOUSE - PAGE 5
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max, Diy. Flow (cu,m)
30-Apr-01 5414 74
May
1 5503 89
2 5565 62
3 5644 79
4 5720 76
5 5774 54
6 5870 96
7 6000 130 Maximum Daily Flow I
8 6109 109
9 6157 48
10 6233 76
11 6299 66
12 6365 66
13 6393 28
14 6481 88
15 6560 79
16 6671 111
17 6755 84
18 6807 52
19 6852 45
20 6934 82
21 7045 111
22 7159 114
23 7208 49
24 7268 60
25 7313 45
26 7371 58
27 7428 57
28 7485 57
29 7538 53
30 7589 51
31 7634 45
Average Daily Flow 72
7..Q,) ~
ROBINCREST PUMPHOUSE - PAGE 6
MAXIMUM DAilY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max. Diy, Flow (cu,m)
31-May-01 7634 45
June
1 7675 41
2 7713 38
3 7767 54
4 7903 136
5 7969 66
6 8017 48
7 8075 58
8 8174 99
9 8287 113
10 8399 112
11 8489 90
12 8602 113
13 8779 177
14 8912 133
15 9040 128
16 9193 153
17 9288 95
18 9423 135
19 9487 64
20 9517 30
21 9558 41
22 9638 80
23 9686 48
24 9736 50
25 9879 143
26 10020 141
27 10169 149
28 10369 200 Maximum Daily Flow I
29 10472 103
30 10663 191
Average Daily Flow 101
Ii..) 16
1 Q J [ f
ROBINCREST PUMPHOUSE - PAGE 7
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max. Diy. Flow (cu.m)
30-Jun-G1 10663 191
July
1 10748 85
2 10788 40
3 10877 89
4 10969 92
5 11039 70
6 11121 82
7 11216 95
8 11411 195
9 11606 195
10 11803 197
11 11950 147
12 12106 156
13 12190 84
14 12457 267
15 12724 267
16 13058 334 Maximum Daily Flow)
17 13183 125
18 13290 107
19 13498 208
20 13589 91
21 13880 291
22 14109 229
23 14371 262
24 14657 286
25 14875 218
26 15101 226
27 15302 201
28 15565 263
29 15828 263
30 16091 263
31 16399 308
Average Daily Flow 185
7~)/(.
ROBINCREST PUMPHOUSE - PAGE 8
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max. Diy. Flow (cu,m)
31-Jul-01 16399 308
August
1 16707 308
2 17010 303
3 17322 312
4 17659 337
5 17996 337
6 18333 337
7 18599 266
8 18917 318
9 19297 380 Maximum Daily Flow I
10 19467 170
11 19652 185
12 19902 250
13 20252 350
*ROADS DEPARTMENT
TAKING WATER
FROM HYDRANT*
14 20491 239
15 20718 227
16 20981 263
17 21044 63
18 21149 105
19 21254 105
20 21300 46
21 21357 57
22 21404 47
23 21462 58
24 21536 74
25 21639 103
26 21743 104
27 21832 89
28 21875 43
29 21920 45
30 21994 74
31 22075 81
Average Daily Flow 183
IJ!. )/3
ROBIN CREST PUMP HOUSE - PAGE 9
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max. Diy, Flow (cu,m)
31-Aug-01 22075 81
September
1 22112 37
2 22170 58
3 22243 73
4 22347 104
5 22392 45
6 22469 77
7 22503 34
8 22549 46
9 22668 119 Maximum Daily Flow I
10 22712 44
11 22760 48
12 22812 52
13 22856 44
14 22889 33
15 22927 38
16 22962 35
17 23057 95
18 23101 44
19 23138 37
20 23175 37
21 23206 31
22 23253 47
23 23301 48
24 23356 55
25 23397 41
26 23436 39
27 23481 45
28 23528 47
29 23578 50
30 23624 46
Average Daily Flow 52
7 ~ ) I~
ROBINCREST PUMPHOUSE - PAGE 10
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max, Diy, Flow (cu.m)
30-Sep-01 23624 46
/'
October
1 23713 89 Maximum Daily Flow I
2 23769 56
3 23808 39
4 23859 51
5 23891 32
6 23925 34
7 23960 35
8 24010 50
9 24052 42
10 24105 53
11 24147 42
12 24180 33
13 24218 38
14 24258 40
15 24312 54
16 24367 55
17 24418 51
18 24455 37
19 24493 38
20 24531 38
21 24571 40
22 24635 64
23 24677 42
24 24720 43
25 24763 43
26 24792 29
27 24828 36
28 24872 44
29 24954 82
30 25002 48
31 25049 47
Average Daily Flow 46
72)/:
ROBINCREST PUMPHOUSE - PAGE 11
MAXIMUM DAilY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max. Diy. Flow (cu,m)
31-0ct-01 25049 47
November
1 25131 82
2 25164 33
3 25217 53
4 25272 55
5 25361 89
6 25718 357 Maximum Daily Flow I
7 25917 199
8 26074 157
9 26152 78
10 26290 138
11 26433 143
12 26596 163
13 26750 154
14 26901 151
15 27037 136
16 27166 129
17 27316 150
18 27467 151
19 27610 143
20 27691 81
21 27784 93
22 27894 110
23 27944 50
24 27995 51
25 28051 56
26 28108 57
27 28153 45
28 28191 38
29 28236 45
30 28279 43
Average Daily Flow 108
. .
/1 \
1 ~) Jb
ROBIN CREST PUMPHOUSE - PAGE 12
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max, Diy. Flow (cu.m)
30-Nov-01 28279 43
December
1 28366 87 Maximum Daily Flow I
2 28391 25
3 28423 32
4 28471 48
5 28511 40
6 28554 43
7 28599 45
8 28648 49
9 28675 27
10 28744 69
11 28788 44
12 28825 37
13 28862 37
14 28903 41
15 28944 41
16 28985 41
17 29026 41
18 29067 41
19 29108 41
20 29149 41
21 29190 41
22 29237 47
23 29280 43
24 29304 24
25 29372 68
26 29410 38
27 29475 65
28 29535 60
29 29578 43
30 29629 51
31 29677 48
Average Daily Flow 45
REPORT
l/Yf) )--{
DEPT. REPORT TO: Council PREPARED BY: '!l
#ES2002-24 Keith Mathieson
SUBJECT & FILE #: DEPARTMENT:
COUNCIL:
Annual Performance Report - Public Works
Shanty Bay Water Supply and
C. OF W. Treatfnent for 2001
MOTION #: DATE:
DATE: March 22, 2002
The Township has received the new Certificates of Approval (C. of A.'s) issued by the Ministry of the
Environment for all the water systems, Section 4 of the C, of A, Compliance Report, requires a
written report detailing that compliance with all terms and conditions of the approval be completed
annually. This Report is to be signed by a person designated by Council of the municipality that owns
the works and a resolution is to be presented to Council that the compliance report has been
received.
This first Compliance Report is due by March 31,2003.
Attached is Shanty Bay's Annual Performance Report for 2001, which was submitted to the Ministry
of the Environment. This Report was structured to comply with next year's Compliance Report and is
being made available to Council for information and confirmation that Ontario Regulation #459/00 is
being complied with by the Township of Oro-Medonte,
1, THAT Council receives and adopts this report,
2, THAT Council designates the Director of Engineering and Environmental Services as the signing
authority for the Compliance Report.
3. THAT the Annual Performance Report for Shanty Bay Water Supply and Treatment 2001 be
received for information,
Keith Mathieson
~(JJJ\
J3
THE CORPORATION OF THE
1fY1 ' 'J'
148 Line 7 S.. Box 100
Oro, Ontario LOL 2XO
TOWN~IIIP
rgm-OfJ%~
Phone (705)487-2171
Fax (705) 487-0133
www.township.oro-medonte.on.ca
March 7, 2002
Ministry of the Environment
54 Cedar Pointe Drive
Unit #1203
BARRIE, Ontario
L4N 5R7
Re: Shanty Bay Water Supply and Treatment
Annual Performance Report for 2001
Dear Sir:
Permit to Take Water Renewal #91-P-3100 was issued to the Township of Oro-Medonte
on February 19, 2001, expiring on February 28. 2011. The maximum amount of water
to be taken per this permit is 295 m3 per day for Well #1 and 295 m3 per day for Well #2,
The Shanty Bay water system supplies 74 homes, plus 23 lots in Phase I of the
Arbourwood Subdivision,
WA TER QUANTITY
Schedules have been attached showing the "average daily flow" per month and the
"maximum daily flow" per month, On July 31, 2001, the Permit to Take Water was
exceeded. Four hundred and forty-four (444) m3 of water was used that day as a result
of flooding the new water system in the Arbourwood Subdivision, At no other time in
2001 was the Permit to Take Water exceeded.
WA TER QUALITY
Bacteriological samples were taken weekly by Township operators and submitted to the
Central Ontario Analytical Laboratory in Orillia. Two hundred and twenty-seven (227)
samples were tested for "total coliforms" and "fecal coliforms" in 2001 and no detectable
results were found.
. , ./2
Page Two
Letter to M.O.E,
Re: Shanty Bay - Annual Performance Report for 2001
March 7,2002
1fY1 ,:3
To ensure that the free chlorine residual was maintained above 0.2 mg/L in the
distribution system, and a free chlorine residual was available in the distribution system,
12% Sodium Hypochlorite was pumped into the system. A total of 160 litres of 12%
Sodium Hypochlorite was used in the Shanty Bay system in 2001,
Daily tests for free chlorine in the treatment plant and in the distribution system were
performed by Township operators using a "Hack Pocket Colorimeter",
Daily tests for turbidity were performed by Township operators using a "Hack Pocket
Turbidity Meter",
Quarterly water quality analyses sampling was performed by Geospec Engineering Ltd.
in order to satisfy testing parameters for treated water as per Regulation #459/00.
Samples were forwarded to Lakefield Research Limited for chemical testing,
The chemical results did not reveal any health related, reportable exceedences during
2001.
Mr. Fred MacGregor, Environmental Foreman of the Township of Oro-Medonte,
performed a calibration test on the existing water meters on June 4, 2001 and they were
calibrated at:
.:. Well #1 - .51 %
.:. Well #2 - .60%, which is well within Ministry of Environment guidelines.
If you require any further information with regards to the Shanty Bay water system,
please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at (705) 487-6499.
Sincerely,
Keith Mathieson, C.R.S.I.
Director of Engineering and Environmental Services
KM/ps
Attachments
SHANTY BAY PUMP HOUSE . WELL #1. PAGE 1
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max. DIy, Flow (cu.m)
January
1 227907
2 228023 116 Maximum Daily Flow 1
3 228086 63
4 228140 54
5 228189 49
6 228225 36
7 228276 51
8 228360 84
9 228403 43
10 228451 48
11 228498 47
12 228549 51
13 228588 39
14 228646 58
15 228725 79
16 228765 40
17 228815 50
18 228867 52
19 228905 38
20 228948 43
21 229009 61
22 229092 83
23 229135 43
24 229185 50
25 229236 51
26 229281 45
27 229319 38
28 229367 48
29 229443 76
30 229481 38
31 229526 45
Average Daily Flow 54
1(Y1 ,y
\
SHANTY BAY PUMPHOUSE - WELL #1 - PAGE 2
/
~ f'1 ' ~
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max, Diy, Flow (cu,m)
31-Jan-Q1 229526 45
February
1 229575 49
2 229628 53
3 229674 46
4 229728 54
5 229773 45
6 229842 69
7 229893 51
8 229940 47
9 229987 47
10 230030 43
11 230091 61
12 230154 63
13 230201 47
14 230247 46
15 230298 51
16 230347 49
17 230393 46
18 230439 46
19 230527 88 Maximum Daily Flow I
20 230572 45
21 230614 42
22 230667 53
23 230713 46
24 230758 45
25 230814 56
26 230886 72
27 230930 44
28 230976 46
Average Daily Flow 52
SHANTY BAY PUMP HOUSE - WELL #1 - PAGE 3
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max, DIy. Flow (cu,m)
28-Feb-01 230976 46
March
1 231020 44
2 231087 67
3 231137 50
4 231199 62
5 231283 84 Maximum Daily Flow I
6 231338 55
7 231393 55
8 231448 55
9 231505 57
10 231549 44
11 231614 65
12 231687 73
13 231744 57
14 231804 60
15 231852 48
16 231907 55
17 231961 54
18 232020 59
19 232097 77
20 232142 45
21 232195 53
22 232248 53
23 232308 60
24 232351 43
25 232417 66
26 232497 80
27 232546 49
28 232598 52
29 232650 52
30 232706 56
31 232746 40
Average Daily Flow 57
I
I
V
/}, r(i
SHANTY BAY PUMPHOUSE - WELL #1 - PAGE 4
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max. Diy. Flow (cu.m)
31-Mar-Q1 232746 40
April
1 232809 63
2 232893 84
3 232944 51
4 232987 43
5 233046 59
6 233105 59
7 233165 60
8 233220 55
9 233324 104
10 233371 47
11 233427 56
12 233487 60
13 233551 64
14 233610 59
15 233666 56
16 233789 123 Maximum Daily Flow 1
17 233810 21
18 233879 69
19 233912 33
20 233972 60
21 234011 39
22 234071 60
23 234168 97
24 234214 46
25 234273 59
26 234352 79
27 234391 39
28 234456 65
29 234548 92
30 234628 80
Average Daily Flow 63
~I'/}"
.
SHANTY BAY PUMPHOUSE - WELL #1 - PAGE 5
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max, Diy, Flow (cu,m)
30-Apr-01 234628 80
May
1 234699 71
2 234775 76
3 234864 89
4 234930 66
5 234996 66
6 235135 139
7 235351 216 Maximum Daily Flow I
8 235482 131
9 235561 79
10 235628 67
11 235732 104
12 235836 104
13 235940 104
14 236065 125
15 236179 114
16 236296 117
17 236385 89
18 236456 71
19 236531 75
20 236658 127
21 236773 115
22 236876 103
23 236928 52
24 236974 46
25 237056 82
26 237103 47
27 237188 85
28 237276 88
29 237337 61
30 237398 61
31 237467 69
Average Daily Flow 92
/1
f
,
i
SHANTY BAY PUMPHOUSE - WELL #1 - PAGE 6
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max. Diy, Flow (cu.m)
31-May-01 237467 69
June '.
1 237541 74
2 237588 47
3 237672 84
4 237757 85
5 237809 52
6 237897 88
7 237965 68
8 238029 64
9 238102 73
10 238204 102
11 238311 107
12 238407 96
13 238476 69
14 238577 101
15 238669 92
16 238733 64
17 238860 127
18 238988 128
19 239060 72
20 239161 101
21 239253 92
22 239328 75
23 239376 48
24 239426 50
25 239579 153 Maximum Daily Flow 1
26 239654 75
27 239797 143
28 239921 124
29 240016 95
30 240138 122
Average Daily Flow 89
f.\ .
vy
.' 1
SHANTY BAY PUMP HOUSE - WELL #1 - PAGE 7
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max. Diy. Flow (cu.m)
30-Jun-01 240138 122
July
1 240215 77
2 240287 72
3 240389 102
4 240447 58
5 240512 65
6 240578 66
7 240648 70
8 240733 85
9 240854 121
10 240957 103
11 241097 140
12 241210 113
13 241352 142
14 241494 142
15 241636 142
16 241780 144
17 241833 53
18 241956 123
19 242057 101
20 242232 175
21 242336 104
22 242431 95
23 242520 89
24 242631 111
25 242709 78
26 242871 162
27 242925 54
28 242985 60
29 243045 60
30 243105 60
31 243549 444 Maximum Daily Flow I
*FLOODED ZONE
FOR ARBOURWOOD
SUBDIVISION*
Average Daily Flow 110
1\
/;~p
SHANTY BAY PUMPHOUSE - WELL #1 - PAGE 8
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max, Diy. Flow (cu.m)
31-Jul-D1 243549 444
August
1 243697 148
2 243908 211
3 244037 129
4 244213 176
5 244389 176
6 244566 177
7 244811 245 Maximum Daily Flow I
8 245056 245
9 245283 227
10 245447 164
11 245533 86
12 245712 179
13 245894 182
14 246016 122
15 246163 147
16 246297 134
17 246383 86
18 246520 137
19 246657 137
20 246740 83
21 246859 119
22 246914 55
23 246949 35
24 247012 63
WELL #2 IN SERVICE
25 247019 7
26 247019 0
27 247019 0
28 247019 0
29 247019 0
30 247019 0
31 247025 6
Average Daily Flow 112
I \
1yi1/1.;
SHANTY BAY PUMPHOUSE - WELL #1 - PAGE 9
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max, Diy. Flow (cu,m)
31-Aug-01 247025 6
Sept,
1 247025 0
2 247025 0
3 247025 0
4 247027 2
5 247027 0
6 247027 0
7 247029 2
8 247029 0
9 247029 0
10 247029 0
11 247032 3 Maximum Daily Flow 1
12 247032 0
13 247032 0
14 247032 0
15 247032 0
16 247032 0
17 247032 0
18 247032 0
19 247032 0
20 247032 0
21 247032 0
22 247032 0
23 247032 0
24 247032 0
25 247032 0
26 247032 0
27 247032 0
28 247032 0
29 247032 0
30 247032 0
Average Daily Flow 0
ro/
1f1,1
SHANTY BAY PUMPHOUSE - WEll #1 - PAGE 10
MAXIMUM DAilY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max. Diy, Flow (cu.m)
30-Sep-01 247032 0
October
1 247037 5
2 247037 0
3 247037 0
4 247037 0
5 247037 0
6 247052 15 Maximum Daily Flow 1
7 247052 0
8 247054 2
9 247054 0
10 247054 0
11 247054 0
12 247054 0
13 247054 0
14 247054 0
15 247054 0
16 247054 0
17 247054 0
18 247056 2
19 247056 0
20 247056 0
21 247056 0
22 247056 0
23 247056 0
24 247056 0
25 247056 0
26 247058 2
27 247058 0
28 247058 0
29 247060 2
30 247060 0
31 247060 0
Average Daily Flow 1
J\
,~ r~
Ii
SHANTY BAY PUMPHOUSE - WELL #1 - PAGE 11
lL
-1 "'11"
f'l'
,
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max, Diy. Flow (cu.m)
31-Oct-01 247060 0
November
1 247060 0
2 247060 0
3 247060 0
4 247060 0
5 247060 0
6 247060 0
7 247060 0
8 247062 2
9 247062 0
10 247062 0
11 247062 0
12 247062 0
13 247062 0
14 247062 0
15 247062 0
16 247062 0
17 247065 3 Maximum Daily Flow I
18 247065 0
19 247065 0
20 247065 0
21 247065 0
22 247065 0
23 247065 0
24 247065 0
25 247065 0
26 247065 0
27 247065 0
28 247065 0
29 247065 0
30 247065 0
Average Daily Flow 0
SHANTY BAY PUMPHOUSE - WELL #1 - PAGE 12
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max. Diy, Flow (cu.m)
30-Nov-01 247065 0
December
1 247065 0 Maximum Daily Flow I
2 247065 0
3 247065 0
4 247065 0
5 247065 0
6 247065 0
7 247065 0
8 247065 0
9 247065 0
10 247065 0
11 247065 0
12 247065 0
13 247065 0
14 247065 0
15 247065 0
16 247065 0
17 247065 0
18 247065 0
19 247065 0
20 247065 0
21 247065 0
22 247065 0
23 247065 0
24 247065 0
25 247065 0
26 247065 0
27 247065 0
28 247065 0
29 247065 0
30 247065 0
31 247065 0
Average Daily Flow 0
1f" J'I~
SHANTY BAY PUMPHOUSE - WELL #2 - PAGE 1
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max. Diy, Flow (cu.m)
January
1 31920
2 31920 0 Maximum Daily Flow I
3 31920 0
4 31920 0
5 31920 0
6 31920 0
7 31920 0
8 31920 0
9 31920 0
10 31920 0
11 31920 0
12 31920 0
13 31920 0
14 31920 0
15 31920 0
16 31920 0
17 31920 0
18 31920 0
19 31920 0
20 31920 0
21 31920 0
22 31920 0
23 31920 0
24 31920 0
25 31920 0
26 31920 0
27 31920 0
28 31920 0
29 31920 0
30 31920 0
31 31920 0
Average Daily Flow 0
U
./\~~l\ ;
~~ I '
SHANTY BAY PUMPHOUSE - WELL #2 - PAGE 2
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max. Diy, Flow (cu.m)
31-Jan-01 31920 0
February
1 31920 0 Maximum Daily Flow I
2 31920 0
3 31920 0
4 31920 0
5 31920 0
6 31920 0
7 31920 0
8 31920 0
9 31920 0
10 31920 0
11 31920 0
12 31920 0
13 31920 0
14 31920 0
15 31920 0
16 31920 0
17 31920 0
18 31920 0
19 31920 0
20 31920 0
21 31920 0
22 31920 0
23 31920 0
24 31920 0
25 31920 0
26 31920 0
27 31920 0
28 31920 0
Average Daily Flow 0
\~
.J\ ~/
.Xf" .
-
SHANTY BAY PUMP HOUSE - WELL #2 - PAGE 3
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max, Diy. Flow (cu.m)
28-Feb-Q1 31920 0
March
1 31920 0
2 31920 0
3 31920 0
4 31920 0
5 31920 0
6 31920 0
7 31920 0
8 31920 0
9 31920 0
10 31920 0
11 31920 0
12 31920 0
13 31920 0
14 31920 0
15 31925 5 Maximum Daily Flow I
16 31925 0
17 31925 0
18 31925 0
19 31925 0
20 31925 0
21 31925 0
22 31929 4
23 31929 0
24 31929 0
25 31929 0
26 31929 0
27 31929 0
28 31929 0
29 31929 0
30 31929 0
31 31929 0
Average Daily Flow 0
'\ (t
) 1"1\ J
\
-
SHANTY BAY PUMPHOUSE - WELL #2 - PAGE 4
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max. Diy. Flow (cu,m)
31-Mar-01 31929 0
April
1 31929 0
2 31929 0
3 31929 0
4 31929 0
5 31929 0
6 31929 0
7 31929 0
8 31929 0
9 31929 0
10 31932 3 Maximum Daily Flow 1
11 31932 0
12 31932 0
13 31932 0
14 31932 0
15 31932 0
16 31932 0
17 31932 0
18 31932 0
19 31932 0
20 31932 0
21 31932 0
22 31932 0
23 31932 0
24 31932 0
25 31932 0
26 31932 0
27 31932 0
28 31932 0
29 31932 0
30 31932 0
Average Daily Flow 0
-11'1\ J\
...
SHANTY BAY PUMPHOUSE - WELL #2 - PAGE 5
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max, Diy, Flow (cu,m)
30-Apr-01 31932 0
May
1 31932 0
2 31932 0
3 31932 0
4 31932 0
5 31932 0
6 31932 0
7 31935 3 Maximum Daily Flow I
8 31935 0
9 31935 0
10 31938 3
11 31938 0
12 31938 0
13 31938 0
14 31938 0
15 31938 0
16 31938 0
17 31938 0
18 31938 0
19 31938 0
20 31938 0
21 31938 0
22 31938 0
23 31938 0
24 31938 0
25 31938 0
26 31938 0
27 31938 0
28 31938 0
29 31938 0
30 31938 0
31 31938 0
Average Daily Flow 0
J\f{~''t
SHANTY BAY PUMPHOUSE - WELL #2 - PAGE 6
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max. Diy. Flow (cu.m)
31-May-01 31938 0
June
1 31938 0 Maximum Daily Flow I
2 31938 0
3 31938 0
4 31938 0
5 31938 0
6 31938 0
7 31938 0
8 31938 0
9 31938 0
10 31938 0
11 31938 0
12 31938 0
13 31938 0
14 31938 0
15 31938 0
16 31938 0
17 31938 0
18 31938 0
19 31938 0
20 31938 0
21 31938 0
22 31938 0
23 31938 0
24 31938 0
25 31938 0
26 31938 0
27 31938 0
28 31938 0
29 31938 0
30 31938 0
Average Daily Flow 0
i, \ I
^ ,0./\ ,)
/ ~ 1 .
\
SHANTY BAY PUMP HOUSE - WELL #2 - PAGE 7
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max, Diy, Flow (cu,m)
30-Jun-01 31938 0
July
1 31938 0
2 31941 3
3 31941 0
4 31941 0
5 31941 0
6 31941 0
7 31941 0
8 31941 0
9 31941 0
10 31942 1
11 31942 0
12 31942 0
13 31942 0
14 31942 0
15 31942 0
16 31942 0
17 31942 0
18 31942 0
19 31942 0
20 31942 0
21 31942 0
22 31942 0
23 31942 0
24 31942 0
25 31950 8 Maximum Daily Flow I
26 31950 0
27 31950 0
28 31950 0
29 31950 0
30 31950 0
31 31950 0
Average Daily Flow 0 I
{\ "
,11
J\ ('1 -
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
^~,o3 .
J 1r'
SHANTY BAY PUMPHOUSE - WELL #2 - PAGE 8
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max, Diy. Flow (cu.m)
31-Jul-01 31950 0
August
1 31950 0
2 31950 0
3 31950 0
4 31952 2
5 31955 3
6 31957 2
7 32038 81
8 32045 7
9 32092 47
10 32092 0
11 32092 0
12 32092 0
13 32092 0
14 32092 0
15 32092 0
16 32092 0
17 32092 0
18 32092 0
19 32092 0
20 32092 0
21 32092 0
22 32092 0
23 32092 0
24 32092 0
WELL #2 IN SERVICE
25 32166 74
26 32240 74
27 32315 75
28 32380 65
29 32428 48
30 32532 104 Maximum Daily Flow I
31 32580 48
Average Daily Flow 20
SHANTY BAY PUMPHOUSE - WELL #2 - PAGE 9
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max, Diy, Flow (cu.m)
31-Aug-01 32580 48
Sept,
1 32645 65
2 32707 62
3 32776 69
4 32886 110
5 32941 55
6 33069 128 Maximum Daily Flow I
7 33094 25
8 33119 25
9 33204 85
10 33284 80
11 33335 51
12 33389 54
13 33460 71
14 33518 58
15 33575 57
16 33641 66
17 33736 95
18 33801 65
19 33854 53
20 33914 60
21 33970 56
22 34030 60
23 34091 61
24 34180 89
25 34247 67
26 34295 48
27 34357 62
28 34414 57
29 34465 51
30 34538 73
Average Daily Flow 65
11'V1J~
1'\.<-
4fi1:o
SHANTY BAY PUMP HOUSE - WELL #2 - PAGE 10
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max, Diy. Flow (cu,m)
30-Sep-01 34538 73
October
1 34622 84
2 34679 57
3 34 772 93
4 34805 33
5 34872 67
6 34917 45
7 34963 46
8 35104 141 Maximum Daily Flow I
9 35126 22
10 35174 48
11 35221 47
12 35285 64
13 35329 44
14 35381 52
15 35463 82
16 35524 61
17 35567 43
18 35606 39
19 35672 66
20 35738 66
21 35806 68
22 35861 55
23 35907 46
24 35966 59
25 35992 26
26 36065 73
27 36113 48
28 36168 55
29 36257 89
30 36310 53
31 36362 52
Average Daily Flow 59
SHANTY BAY PUMPHOUSE. WELL #2. PAGE 11
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max, Diy, Flow (cu,m)
31-0ct-01 36362 52
November
1 36403 41
2 36473 70
3 36515 42
4 36560 45
5 36681 121 Maximum Daily Flow I
6 36727 46
7 36789 62
8 36834 45
9 36891 57
10 36938 47
11 36994 56
12 37066 72
13 37135 69
14 37180 45
15 37235 55
16 37288 53
17 37329 41
18 37371 42
19 37409 38
20 37526 117
21 37569 43
22 37604 35
23 37685 81
24 37764 79
25 37802 38
26 37866 64
27 37910 44
28 37966 56
29 38011 45
30 38076 65
Average Daily Flow 57
rol.J
l\r'
..
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Ix"
J\r~. .
SHANTY BAY PUMPHOUSE - WELL #2 - PAGE 12
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max. Diy. Flow (cu.m)
30-Nov-01 38076 65
December
1 38122 46
2 38172 50
3 38274 102
4 38322 48
5 38400 78
6 38462 62
7 38504 42
8 38595 91
9 38618 23
10 38704 86
11 38749 45
12 38810 61
13 38861 51
14 38903 42
15 38996 93
16 39044 48
17 39091 47
18 39158 67
19 39211 53
20 39265 54
21 39354 89
22 39389 35
23 39422 33
24 39460 38
25 39540 80
26 39590 50
27 39714 124 Maximum Daily Flow I
28 39775 61
29 39836 61
30 39897 61
31 39958 61
Average Daily Flow 61
REPORT
1 h)-I
DEPT. REPORT TO: Council PREPARED BY:
#ES2002-25 Keith Mathieson
SUBJECT & FILE #: DEPARTMENT:
COUNCIL:
Annual Performance Report - Public Works
Sugatbush Water Supply and
C. OF W. Treatment for 2001
MOTION #: DATE:
DATE: March 22, 2002
BACKGRO
The Township has received the new Certificates of Approval (C, of A.'s) issued by the Ministry of the
Environment for all the water systems. Section 4 of the C. of A" Compliance Report, requires a
written report detailing that compliance with all terms and conditions of the approval be completed
annually. This Report is to be signed by a person designated by Council of the municipality that owns
the works and a resolution is to be presented to Council that the compliance report has been
received,
This first Compliance Report is due by March 31,2003,
Attached is Sugarbush's Annual Performance Report for 2001, which was submitted to the Ministry of
the Environment. This Report was structured to comply with next year's Compliance Report and is
being made available to Council for information and confirmation that Ontario Regulation #459/00 is
being complied with by the Township of Oro-Medonte,
RECOMMENDAT
1 . THAT Council receives and adopts this report,
2. THAT Council designates the Director of Engineering and Environmental Services as the signing
authority for the Compliance Report,
3. THAT the Annual Performance Report for Sugarbush Water Supply and Treatment 2001 be
received for information,
ReWUIIY submitted,
~~
Keith Mathieson
~
t~
-j 1'\ )- ;z
THE CORPORATION OF THE
148 Line 7 5.. Box 100"
Oro. Ontario LOL lXO
TOWN~tlIP
-&/V-~~~
Phone (705)487-217"1
Fax (705) 487-0133
www.township.oro-medome.on.c
March 11, 2002
Ministry of the Environment
54 Cedar Pointe Drive
Unit #1203
BARRIE, Ontario
L4N 5R7
Re: Sugarbush Water Supply and Treatment
Annual Performance Report for 2001
Dear Sir:
Permit to Take Water Renewal #95-P-5062 for Well #1 was issued to the Township of
Oro-Medonte on November 20, 2000, expiring on November 27, 2010, permitting 850
m3 of water taken per day,
Permit to Take Water #95-P-5062 for Well #2 was issued to the Township of Oro-
Medonte on October 20, 1995, expiring on March 31, 2005, permitting 1,635 m3 of water
taken per day,
The Sugarbush water system supplies 285 homes with water.
WATER QUANTITY
Schedules have been attached showing the "average daily flow" per month and the
"maximum daily flow" per month for the Sugarbush system. At no time during 2001 did
the "maximum daily flow" exceed the Permit to Take Water.
WA TER QUALITY
Bacteriological samples were taken weekly by Township operators and submitted to the
Central Ontario Analytical Laboratory in Orillia. Two hundred (200) samples were tested
for "total coliforms" and "fecal coliforms" in 2001 and no detectable results were found,
. , ./2
1A)-3
Page Two
Letter to M.O.E,
Re: Sugarbush - Annual Performance Report for 2001
March 11, 2002
To ensure that the free chlorine residual was maintained above 0.2 mg/L in the
distribution system, and a free chlorinefesidual was available in the distribution system,
12% Sodium Hypochlorite was pumped into the system, A total of 140 litres of 12%
Sodium Hypochlorite was used in the Sugarbush system in 2001,
Daily tests for free chlorine in the treatment plant and in the distribution system were
performed by Township operators using a "Hack Pocket Colorimeter".
Daily tests for turbidity were performed by Township operators using a "Hack Pocket
Turbidity Meter",
Quarterly water quality analyses sampling was performed by Geospec Engineering Ltd.
in order to satisfy testing parameters for treated water as per Regulation #459/00,
Samples were forwarded to Lakefield Research Limited for chemical testing.
The chemical results did not reveal any health related, reportable exceedences during
2001.
The water meters for the Sugarbush system were not calibrated during 2001. The
Township is presently making arrangements to have the meters calibrated by outside
sources due to the size of meter and flow rate.
If you require any further information with regards to the Sugarbush water system,
please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at (705) 487-6499.
Sincerely,
RO-MEDONTE
Keith Mathieson, C,R.S.I.
Director of Engineering and Environmental Services
KM/ps
Attachments
7f1 )-f
SUGARBUSHPUMPHOUSE-PAGE1
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max. Diy. Flow (cu,m)
January
1 299055
2 299288 233
3 299451 163
4 299656 205
5 299825 169
6 299944 119
7 300155 211
8 300364 209
9 300478 114
10 300719 241
11 300884 165
12 301006 122
13 301169 163
14 301331 162
15 301590 259 Maximum Daily Flow I
16 301715 125
17 301874 159
18 302034 160
19 302192 158
20 302358 166
21 302520 162
22 302774 254
23 302939 165
24 303053 114
25 303291 238
26 303386 95
27 303550 164
28 303714 164
29 303922 208
30 304153 231
31 304243 90
Average Daily Flow 173
7f1} s-
f
SUGARBUSHPUMPHOUSE-PAGE2
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max. Diy. Flow (cu,m)
31-Jan-Q1 304243 90
February
1 304407 164
2 304587 180
3 304727 140
4 304889 162
5 305151 262 Maximum Daily Flow I
6 305316 165
7 305479 163
8 305632 153
9 305807 175
10 305928 121
11 306134 206
12 306339 205
13 306498 159
14 306602 104
15 306787 185
16 306984 197
17 307148 164
18 307311 163
19 307524 213
20 307691 167
21 307893 202
22 308055 162
23 308179 124
24 308337 158
25 308502 165
26 308746 244
27 308910 164
28 309077 167
Average Daily Flow 173
SUGARBUSH PUMPHOUSE - PAGE 3
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max. Diy, Flow (cu.m)
28-Feb-01 309077 167
March
1 309247 170
2 309371 124
3 309533 162
4 309742 209
5 309950 208
6 310152 202
7 310275 123
8 310426 151
9 310640 214
10 310764 124
11 310927 163
12 311183 256 Maximum Daily Flow I
13 311347 164
14 311439 92
15 311671 232
16 311870 199
17 311992 122
18 312158 166
19 312376 218
20 312541 165
21 312700 159
22 312858 158
23 313059 201
24 313181 122
25 313389 208
26 313600 211
27 313766 166
28 313928 162
29 314087 159
30 314209 122
31 314324 115
Average Daily Flow 169
711 ') -10
7~)- 7
SUGARBUSHPUMPHOUSE-PAGE4
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max, Diy. Flow (cu.m)
31-Mar-01 314324 115
April
1 314537 213
2 314746 209
3 314948 202
4 315120 172
5 315241 121
6 315389 148
7 315551 162
8 315714 163
9 315930 216
10 316097 167
11 316263 166
12 316424 161
13 316599 175
14 316779 180
15 316943 164
16 317231 288 Maximum Daily Flow I
17 317367 136
18 317521 154
19 317727 206
20 317845 118
21 318000 155
22 318253 253
23 318442 189
24 318632 190
25 318802 170
26 318959 157
27 319132 173
28 319317 185
29 319557 240
30 319775 218
Average Daily Flow 182
IA)- ~
.
SUGARBUSHPUMPHOUSE-PAGE5
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max. Diy, Flow (cu.m)
30-Apr-01 319775 218
May
1 320124 349
2 320380 256
3 320703 323
4 321017 314
5 321233 216
6 321511 278
7 321976 465 Maximum Daily Flow I
8 322212 236
9 322384 172
10 322696 312
11 322876 180
12 323046 170
13 323207 161
14 323529 322
15 323797 268
16 324090 293
17 324311 221
18 324478 167
19 324650 172
20 324968 318
21 325319 351
22 325587 268
23 325830 243
24 326015 185
25 326199 184
26 326361 162
27 326577 216
28 326797 220
29 326954 157
30 327243 289
31 327332 89
Average Daily Flow 244
7n)- J
SUGARBUSHPUMPHOUSE-PAGE6
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max. Diy, Flow (cu.m)
31-May-01 327332 89
F
June
1 327479 147
2 327586 107
3 327797 211
4 328052 255
5 328256 204
6 328397 141
7 328595 198
8 328867 272
9 329140 273
10 329412 272
11 329653 241
12 329973 320
13 330247 274
14 330569 322
15 330888 319
16 331141 253
17 331461 320
18 331892 431
19 332160 268
20 332400 240
21 332825 425
22 332995 170
23 333156 161
24 333318 162
25 333775 457 Maximum Daily Flow I
26 334142 367
27 334550 408
28 334881 331
29 335309 428
30 335703 394
Average Daily Flow 279
<711]-10
SUGARBUSHPUMPHOUSE-PAGE7
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max. Diy, Flow (cu,m)
30-Jun-Q1 335703 394
July
1 336044 341
2 336273 229
3 336549 276
4 336713 164
5 337027 314
6 337242 215
7 337526 284
8 337811 285
9 338441 630
10 338903 462
11 339198 295
12 339500 302
13 339802 302
14 340754 952 Maximum Daily Flow I
15 341402 648
16 342138 736
17 342427 289
18 342783 356
19 343325 542
20 343727 402
21 344245 518
22 344627 382
23 345047 420
24 345502 455
25 345973 471
26 346407 434
27 346881 474
28 347540 659
29 348199 659
30 348859 660
31 349493 634
Average Daily Flow 445
7())~11
SUGARBUSH PUMPHOUSE - PAGE 8
MAXIMUM DAilY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max. Diy, Flow (cu,m)
31-Jul-Q1 349493 634
p'
August
1 350127 634
2 350760 633
3 351444 684
4 352128 684
5 352812 684
6 353494 682
7 354456 962 Maximum Daily Flow '1
8 355266 810
9 355923 657
10 356337 414
11 356767 430
12 357358 591
13 358018 660
14 358600 582
15 359135 535
16 359523 388
17 359651 128
18 359920 269
19 360189 269
20 360370 181
21 360553 183
22 360722 169
23 360929 207
24 361093 164
25 361293 200
26 361492 199
27 361679 187
28 361919 240
29 362121 202
30 362230 109
31 362440 210
Average Daily Flow 418
SUGAR BUSH PUMPHOUSE - PAGE 9
MAXIMUM CAlLY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max, Diy. Flow (cu.m)
31-Aug-Q1 362440 210
September ,
1 362601 161
2 362813 212
3 363029 216
4 363360 331
5 363524 164
6 363749 225
7 363906 157
8 364126 220
9 364348 222
10 364528 180
11 364639 111
12 364977 338
13 365498 521 Maximum Daily Flow I
14 365777 279
15 366151 374
16 366420 269
17 366870 450
18 367152 282
19 367395 243
20 367555 160
21 367720 165
22 367883 163
23 368048 165
24 368309 261
25 368479 170
26 368615 136
27 368770 155
28 368935 165
29 369099 164
30 369263 164
Average Daily Flow 227
7T1)-/~
/1-/3
SUGARBUSH PUMPHOUSE - PAGE 10
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max, Diy. Flow (cu,m)
30-Sep-01 369263 164
October
1 369519 256
2 369697 178
3 369846 149
4 370055 209
5 370182 127
6 370346 164
7 370521 175
8 370751 230
9 370981 230
10 371211 230
11 371383 172
12 371426 43
13 371590 164
14 371751 161
15 372012 261
16 372163 151
17 372314 151
18 372466 152
19 372626 160
20 372791 165
21 372956 165
22 373207 251
23 373371 164
24 373503 132
25 373672 169
26 373806 134
27 373960 154
28 374105 145
29 374374 269 Maximum Daily Flow I
30 374552 178
31 374687 135
Average Daily Flow 175
SUGARBUSHPUMPHOUSE-PAGE11
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max. Diy. Flow (cu.m)
31-Oct-Q1 374687 135
November
1 374792 105
2 374995 203
3 375157 162
4 375322 165
5 375547 225
6 375732 185
7 375841 109
8 376011 170
9 376148 137
10 376299 151
11 376460 161
12 376681 221
13 376872 191
14 377030 158
15 377188 158
16 377357 169
17 377519 162
18 377682 163
19 377989 307 Maximum Daily Flow I
20 378111 122
21 378326 215
22 378481 155
23 378646 165
24 378772 126
25 378985 213
26 379283 298
27 379458 175
28 379613 155
29 379815 202
30 379985 170
Average Daily Flow 177
71- If.
7n- /S-
SUGARBUSHPUMPHOUSE-PAGE12
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max. Diy. Flow (cu.m)
30-Nov-D1 379985 170
December
1 380170 185
2 380266 96
3 380573 307 Maximum Daily Flow I
4 380772 199
5 381002 230
6 381063 61
7 381270 207
8 381399 129
9 381594 195
10 381893 299
11 382067 174
12 382217 150
13 382408 191
14 382644 236
15 382814 170
16 383044 230
17 383178 134
18 383382 204
19 383588 206
20 383712 124
21 383919 207
22 384068 149
23 384250 182
24 384473 223
25 384727 254
26 385010 283
27 385242 232
28 385492 250
29 385716 224
30 385940 224
31 386164 224
Average Daily Flow 199
.
REPORT
10-'
DEPT. REPORT TO: Council PREPARED BY:
#ES2002-26 Keith Mathieson
SUBJECT & FILE #: DEPARTMENT:
COUNCIL:
Annual Performance Report - Public Works
Warminster Water Supply and
C.OFW. Treatment for 2001
MOTION #: DATE:
DATE: March 22, 2002
The Township has received the new Certificates of Approval (C, of A.'s) issued by the Ministry of the
Environment for all the water systems. Section 4 of the C, of A, Compliance Report, requires a
written report detailing that compliance with all terms and conditions of the approval be completed
annually. This Report is to be signed by a person designated by Council of the municipality that owns
the works and a resolution is to be presented to Council that the compliance report has been
received,
This first Compliance Report is due by March 31, 2003.
Attached is Warminster's Annual Performance Report for 2001, which was submitted to the Ministry
of the Environment. This Report was structured to comply with next year's Compliance Report and is
being made available to Council for information and confirmation that Ontario Regulation #459/00 is
being complied with by the Township of Oro-Medonte,
1. THAT Council receives and adopts this report,
2, THAT Council designates the Director of Engineering and Environmental Services as the signing
authority for the Compliance Report.
3, THAT the Annual Performance Report for Warminster Water Supply and Treatment 2001 be
received for information,
~~
V
THE CORPORATION OF THE
1o-Y
TOWN6tlIP
-&/UOf~~
148 Line 7 5., Box 100
Oro, Ontario LOL 2X0
Phone (705)487-2171
Fax (705) 487-0133
VNIW .township.oro-medonte,on.ca
March 8, 2002
Ministry of the Environment
54 Cedar Pointe Drive
Unit #1203
BARRIE, Ontario
L4N 5R7
Re: Warminster Water Supply and Treatment
Annual Performance Report for 2001
Dear Sir:
Permit to Take Water #92-P-3071 for Well #1 was issued to the Township of Oro-
Medonte on September 8, 1992, expiring on March 31, 2002 (renewal application was
made on November 8,2001), permitting 928 m3 per day.
Permit to Take Water #96-P-5003 for Well #2 was issued to the Township of Oro-
Medonte on May 1,1996, expiring on March 31, 2006, permitting 212 m3 per day,
The Warminster water system supplies 203 homes, the Warminster Public School and
the Warminster Legion.
WATER QUANTITY
Schedules have been attached showing the "average daily flow" per month and the
"maximum daily flow" per month for the Warminster system, At no time during 2001 did
the "maximum daily flow" exceed the Permit to Take Water,
WATER QUALITY
Bacteriological samples were taken weekly by Township operators and submitted to the
Central Ontario Analytical Laboratory in Orillia, Two hundred and seven (207) samples
were tested for "total coliforms" and "fecal coliforms" in 2001, Four (4) test results during
the year had reportable counts of "total coliforms", MOEE Spills Action Centre and the
Simcoe County District Health Unit were notified and resamples were taken. No further
action was required,
, . ./2
Page Two
Letter to M,O.E.
Re: Warminster - Annual Performance Report for 2001
March 8, 2002
~o/3-
,
To ensure that the free chlorine residual was maintained above 0.2 mg/L in the
distribution system, and a free chlorine residual was available in the distribution system,
12% Sodium Hypochlorite was pumped into the system, A total of 280 litres of 12%
Sodium Hypochlorite was used in the Warminster system in 2001.
Daily tests for free chlorine in the treatment plant and in the distribution system were
performed by Township operators using a "Hack Pocket Colorimeter".
Daily tests for turbidity were performed by Township operators using a "Hack Pocket
Turbidity Meter".
Quarterly water quality analyses sampling was performed by Geospec Engineering Ltd.
in order to satisfy testing parameters for treated water as per Regulation #459/00.
Samples were forwarded to Lakefield Research Limited for chemical testing.
The chemical results did not reveal any health related, reportable exceedences during
2001.
Mr. Fred MacGregor, Environmental Foreman of the Township of Oro-Medonte, installed
a new calibrated meter chamber on June 6, 2001.
If you require any further information with regards to the Warminster water system,
please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at (705) 487-6499.
Sincerely,
~/
Keith Mathieson, C.R.S.I.
Director of Engineering and Environmental Services
KM/ps
Attachments
WARMINSTER PUMPHOUSE . PAGE 1
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max, Diy, Flow (cu.m)
January
1 12569
2 12720 151
3 12863 143
4 12986 123
5 13124 138
6 13275 151
7 13430 155
8 13605 175
9 13770 165
10 13866 96
11 14044 178
12 14162 118
13 14299 137
14 14442 143
15 14646 204
16 14803 157
17 14970 167
18 15082 112
19 15238 156
20 15376 138
21 15564 188
22 15738 174
23 15907 169
24 16149 242 Maximum Daily Flow 1
25 16214 65
26 16327 113
27 16481 154
28 16638 157
29 16830 192
30 17014 184
31 17154 140
Average Daily Flow 153
/1 ~~ "
1~/
WAR MINSTER PUMPHOUSE - PAGE 2
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max. Diy, Flow (cu.m)
31-Jan-01 17154 140
February
1 17266 112
2 17433 167
3 17574 141
4 17722 148
5 17891 169
6 18057 166
7 18196 139
8 18321 125
9 18486 165
10 18581 95
11 18736 155
12 18925 189
13 19066 141
14 19219 153
15 19367 148
16 19515 148
17 19663 148
18 19812 149
19 19932 120
20 20110 178
21 20280 170
22 20421 141
23 20540 119
24 20670 130
25 20835 165
26 21054 219 Maximum Daily Flow I
27 21222 168
28 21393 171
Average Daily Flow 151
J
1 ,....'
'.
.......
,.. _.i j;
. , ,~t') '>''."./
...... .
WARMINSTER PUMPHOUSE . PAGE 3
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS. 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max, Diy, Flow (cu.m)
28-Feb-01 21393 171
March
1 21492 99
2 21632 140
3 21803 171
4 21973 170
5 22136 163
6 22327 191
7 22498 171
8 22656 158
9 22803 147
10 22928 125
11 23105 177
12 23334 229 Maximum Daily Flow I
13 23534 200
14 23681 147
15 23823 142
16 24026 203
17 24151 125
18 24343 192
19 24557 214
20 24757 200
21 24918 161
22 25092 174
23 25263 171
24 25425 162
25 25616 191
26 25797 181
27 25984 187
28 26144 160
29 26333 189
30 26496 163
31 26639 143
Average Daily Flow 169
L
10/
WAR MINSTER PUMPHOUSE - PAGE 4
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max, Diy, Flow (cu.m)
31-Mar-01 26639 143
April
1 26833 194
2 27062 229
3 27269 207
4 27454 185
5 27632 178
6 27757 125
7 27941 184
8 28126 185
9 28287 161
10 28460 173
11 28605 145
12 28762 157
13 28911 149
14 29060 149
15 29209 149
16 29341 132
17 29591 250 Maximum Daily Flow I
18 29689 98
19 29921 232
20 30044 123
21 30207 163
22 30324 117
23 30566 242
24 30752 186
25 30927 175
26 31144 217
27 31236 92
28 31374 138
29 31577 203
30 31750 173
Average Daily Flow 170
10,1'
. WAR MINSTER PUMP HOUSE - PAGE 5
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max, Diy. Flow (cu.m)
30-Apr-01 31750 173
May
1 32016 266
2 32184 168
3 32394 210
4 32581 187
5 32731 150
6 32910 179
7 33223 313
8 33358 135
9 33522 164
10 33693 171
11 33919 226
12 34155 236
13 34225 70
14 34414 189
15 34609 195
16 34806 197
17 34957 151
18 35132 175
19 35294 162
20 35529 235
21 35759 230
22 35999 240
23 36329 330
24 36498 169
25 36626 128
26 36754 128
27 36884 130
28 37198 314
29 37404 206
30 37752 348 Maximum Daily Flow I
31 37935 183
Average Daily Flow 200
n ("/
/10' b
!
WAR MINSTER PUMPHOUSE - PAGE 6
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max. Diy. Flow (cu,m)
31-May-01 37935 183
June
1 38120 185
2 38262 142
3 38423 161
4 38636 213
5 38812 176
6 38967 155
7 39121 154
8 39305 184
9 39535 230
10 39764 229
11 39897 133
12 40174 277
13 40405 231
14 40632 227
15 40805 173
16 40987 182
17 41248 261
18 41504 256
19 41748 244
20 41921 173
21 42239 318
22 42389 150
23 42587 198
24 42785 198
25 43022 237
26 43274 252
27 43598 324 Maximum Daily Flow I
28 43834 236
29 44050 216
30 44336 286
Average Daily Flow 213
11
/1
X
1
WAR MINSTER PUMPHOUSE - PAGE 7
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max, Diy, Flow (cu.m)
30..Jun-01 44336 286
July
1 44561 225
2 44750 189
3 44957 207
4 45223 266
5 45351 128
6 45525 174
7 45750 225
8 45975 225
9 46333 358 Maximum Daily Flow I
10 46524 191
11 46790 266
12 46979 189
13 47200 221
14 47532 332
15 47864 332
16 48198 334
17 48448 250
18 48652 204
19 48930 278
20 49273 343
21 49427 154
22 49678 251
23 49941 263
24 50241 300
25 50555 314
26 50821 266
27 51026 205
28 51344 318
29 51662 318
30 51980 318
31 52304 324
Average Daily Flow 257
1'.,', )U
O ';
.'
WARMINSTER PUMPHOUSE - PAGE 8
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max, Diy, Flow (cu.m)
31-Jul-01 52304 324
August
1 52628 324
2 52952 324
3 53276 324
4 53707 431
5 54139 432 Maximum Daily Flow I
6 54569 430
7 54742 173
8 55153 411
9 55475 322
10 55695 220
11 55986 291
12 56316 330
13 56665 349
14 57022 357
15 57322 300
16 57553 231
17 57733 180
18 57954 221
19 58175 221
20 58351 176
21 58541 190
22 58734 193
23 58899 165
24 59098 199
25 59170 72
26 59244 74
27 59307 63
'HAD TO MANUALLY
OPERATE WELL ON
AUGUST 25, 26, 27'
28 59609 302
29 59802 193
30 59981 179
31 60127 146
Average Daily Flow 252
/'1 i)
to/I '.
. WARMINSTER PUMPHOUSE - PAGE 9
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max, Diy. Flow (cu.m)
31-Aug-01 60127 146
September
1 60317 190
2 60494 177
3 60689 195
4 60944 255 Maximum Daily Flow I
5 61155 211
6 61321 166
7 61492 171
8 61634 142
9 61843 209
10 62085 242
11 62262 177
12 62446 184
13 62632 186
14 62761 129
15 62922 161
16 63084 162
17 63306 222
18 63511 205
19 63673 162
20 63833 160
21 63995 162
22 64180 185
23 64365 185
24 64595 230
25 64729 134
26 64920 191
27 65085 165
28 65229 144
29 65463 234
30 65574 111
Average Daily Flow 182
rf
l' ~,
,,.I I ~-...
V'.
l
WARMINSTER PUMPHOUSE - PAGE 10
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max, Diy, Flow (cu,m)
30-Sep-01 65574 111
October
1 65824 250
2 66049 225
3 66220 171
4 66389 169
5 66537 148
6 66725 188
7 66915 190
8 67179 264 Maximum Daily Flow I
9 67288 109
10 67495 207
11 67684 189
12 67796 112
13 67962 166
14 68130 168
15 68342 212
16 68537 195
17 68743 206
18 68921 178
19 69054 133
20 69278 224
21 69503 225
22 69679 176
23 69854 175
24 69999 145
25 70105 106
26 70305 200
27 70503 198
28 70677 174
29 70903 226
30 71098 195
31 71297 199
Average Daily Flow 185
10/~
WAR MINSTER PUMPHOUSE - PAGE 11
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu.m) Max. Diy, Flow (cu,m)
31-0ct-01 71297 199
November
1 71497 200
2 71615 118
3 71800 185
4 72010 210
5 72164 154
6 72367 203 .
7 72581 214
8 72744 163
9 72847 103
10 73013 166
11 73194 181
12 73402 208
13 73613 211
14 73810 197
15 74002 192
16 74142 140
17 74348 206
18 74553 205
19 74763 210
20 74989 226 Maximum Daily Flow 1
21 75146 157
22 75303 157
23 75438 135
24 75598 160
25 75759 161
26 75949 190
27 76138 189
28 76270 132
29 76471 201
30 76659 188
Average Daily Flow 179
/1 tLI
I -r J .
l.- 0" !
A
WARMINSTER PUMPHOUSE - PAGE 12
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2001
Date Flow Reading (cu,m) Max. Diy, Flow (cu,m)
30-Nov-01 76659 188
December
1 76844 185
2 77032 188
3 77261 229
4 77499 238
5 77679 180
6 77840 161
7 78071 231
8 78244 173
9 78401 157
10 78641 240
11 78847 206
12 79004 157
13 79205 201
14 79437 232
15 79647 210
16 79838 191
17 80031 193
18 80262 231
19 80439 177
20 80610 171
21 80794 184
22 81014 220
23 81202 188
24 81437 235
25 81674 237
26 81844 170
27 82049 205
28 82295 246 Maximum Daily Flow I
29 82526 231
30 82741 215
31 82902 161
Average Daily Flow 201
/1 J
I I(
I f J.
.~ .;-
"1D
'.
REPORT
1p - I
DEPT. REPORT TO: Council PREPARED BY:
#PWS2002-03 Jerry Ball
SUBJECT & FILE #: DEPARTMENT:
COUNCIL:
Oro District Lions Club - Roads
Request for Signage
C.OFW.
MOTION #: DATE:
DATE: March 22, 2002
Correspondence (attached) was received by Council at its meeting on February 6,2002 from the Oro
District Lions Club requesting permission to place their information sign on the lower portion of the
existing "Oro-Medonte...proud heritage, exciting future!" signs, more particularly within the old
Oro boundaries,
There are presently eight signs at the following locations:
.:. Hwy. #12 and Moonstone Road
.:. Hwy. #12 and Coldwater Road
.:. County Rd. #22 at Prices Corners
.:. County Rd. #93 at Dalston
.:. County Rd. #11 at Dalston
.:. County Rd, #11 at Line 15
.:. Shanty Bay Road at Barrie Terrace, and
.:. Hwy. #11 at Napoleon Fireplaces
Prior to these signs being erected, the municipality obtained permission from either M,T.O., the
County of Simcoe, or private property owners for installation. These signs meet the Manual of
Uniform Traffic Control Devices minimum requirement of 1,5 metres in height off the road elevation
and were not designed to affix any additional signage. To compensate for the request by the Lions
Club would mean the installation of new posts to raise the signs to the proper height.
SUMMARY:
It is suggested that the Oro District Lions Club approach the County of Simcoe, or private property
owners, for permission to erect new signs and posts at approved locations solely for their own use,
, ......
1, THAT Council receives and adopts this report.
2, THAT the Public Works Superintendent advises the Oro District Lions Club to contact the County
of Simcoe By-law Department, or private property owners, for permission to erect their marketing
signs within the County road allowance, or on private property,
Respectfully submitted,
(j)~~
I
, ~,.~ .\t) ry-
J ~\
\N~
I -
,.
LcJ3
I
:
.
1.-0 J' - I
Jan.22,2001
ORO DISTRICT LIONS CLUB
P.o. BOX 45
ORO, ONTARIO
CANADA
LOL 2XO
"
i.iayor Ian Beard
Oro-Medonte Township
SERVICE CLUB INFORMATION SIGNAGE
The Oro District Lions Club would like to ask Township Council
for permission to add an information sign to the lower portion
of the Township 'blue signs' at the entry points to the former
"Oro" portion of the township.
The enclosed simulated photo shows our proposed signage. Our
club has always felt a need for improved public awareness of
out existence within the community. We hope that Council will
find this idea appropriate and acceptable.
Please contact club president Ron Weir (487-3390) if further
information or discussion is needed.
-~A/~
Ron Weir
President
Oro District Lions Club
487-3390
enclosures(2)
RJM/bm
?5q-1
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
OFFICE OF THE TOWNSHIP PLANNER AND THE
DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
SERVICES
IREPORT TO COUNCIL
I
REPORT NO.: PD2002-12 COUNCIL
PREPARED BY: Andria Leigh C.OFW.
Keith Mathieson
DATE: February 25, 2002 MOTION
SUBJECT: Lake Simcoe Environmental DATE
Management Strategy (LSEMS)
Year End Report 2001
IBACKGROUND/SUMMARY
I
In Septemb~'r 2000 the Township was requested to appoint representatives to sit on the Lake
Simcoe Elwirunmental Management Strategy Technical Committee and Steering Committee.
Keith Mathil'~on was appointed as the representative to the Technical Committee and Jennifer
Zieleniew~kl ,mdj or Andria Leigh as the representatives to the Steering Committee.
The LSEt-.I<'" program has been in existence for approximately 10 years and at the time of the
Township [)\"l-uming members of the committee Phase III of the Implementation program was
being initi,1tl'd. The primary goal of LSEMS is to improve and protect the health of the Lake
Simcoe V\',ltershed,
As new nwrnbers to these Committees, the Township was involved in the formulation of the
Memorandum of Understanding for Phase III of the Implementation Program for the next six-
year time period,
3
Attached to this report is the LSEMS year-end report for 2001 that provides an informative
summary of the activities carried out in 2001, The report outlines eight main activities as
follows:
1, Developing a new Memorandum of Understanding for LSEMS Phase III;
2. Developing a Total Water Quality Program (P trading);
3. Developing and delivering a revised Communication Strategy;
4. Identifying a preferred option for treatment of pump-off water from the Holland Marsh
and developing funding proposals in partnership with the Lake Simcoe Region
Conservation Foundation;
5. Developing a rural water quality project proposal for submission to the Health Futures
Program for Ontario Agriculture Program;
6. Continuing monitoring of water quality and the fishery;
7. Completing the first step of the Lake Simcoe Watershed Plan, the production of a "State of
the Watershed Report";
8. Continue to complete projects to reduce phosphorus inputs and improve water quality of
Lake Simcoe.
A summary of each activity is provided in the attachment,
The Township will continue to participate on both the Steering and Technical Committees and
continue to inform Council of the activities being carried out through this initiative,
IRECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the year-end report on the Lake Simcoe Environrnent~l Management
Strategy for 2001 be received for information.
Respectfully submitted,
~J --t-yt
~
Andria Leigh, MCIP,RPP
Township Planner
Keith Mathieson
Director of Engineering &
Environmental Services
c.A.O, COMMENTS:
DATE:
'6
C.AD.
(\~
V\ () tJ5~
DEPT.HEAD
f'l, ,...
-(7
I
. ~'Vl)<. ~ '.'~o..~
~ ~
... ,.
.. ....
, .
~ ....
"'40 a~~~
'19, .;:;
C. EN1 S"~
LAKE SIMCOE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGMENT STRATEGY (LSEMS)
LSEMS YEAR END REPORT FOR 2001
Revised January 15, 2002
r")
~J
Introduction:
The following report summarizes the activities of the LSEMS partners in 2001, The report
format corresponds to the approved LSEMS work plan, which contained eight main activities
as follows:
1. Developing a new Memorandum of Understanding for LSEMS Phase III,
2. Developing a Total Water Quality Program (P trading).
3, Developing and delivering a revised Communication Strategy,
4. Identifying a preferred option for treatment of pump-off water from the Holland
Marsh and developing funding proposals in partnership with the Lake Simcoe
Region Conservation Foundation,
5, Developing a rural water quality project proposal for submission to the Healthy
Futures Program for Ontario Agriculture Program.
6, Continuing monitoring of water quality and the fishery,
7, Completing the first step of the Lake Simcoe Watershed Plan, the production of a
"State of the Watershed Report",
8, Continue to complete projects to reduce phosphorus inputs and improve water
quality of Lake Simcoe.
1. Developing a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for Phase III of the LSEMS
Implementation Program (Year 2001)
The present LSEMS Phase II MOU expired at the end of 2000. To ensure that the LSEMS
initiatives continued a new MOU for Phase III was developed by the Steering Committee to
be signed in 2001. The Phase III MOU was produced as planned and is presently being
reviewed by all partners for their approval. It is anticipated that a launch for Phase III will
occur in 2002.
2. Developing a Total Water Quality Program (P trading)
The Total Phosphorus Management Study was completed in 2000 with the release of the
final report "Total Phosphorus Management in the Lake Simcoe Watershed", Results
indicate that a viable trading program can be established that would not only achieve the
LSEMS objective of reducing phosphorus but could do so at a reduced cost. An LSEMS
working committee (MOE, municipalities, OMAFRA, LSRCA) has been formed to begin the
steps necessary to implement the program, This Committee is being led by the LSRCA,
Project applications for funding have been submitted to the province to hire a consultant to
assist in the final steps to develop and deliver the program, Next steps involve meeting with
all the watershed municipalities and the development sector to present the proposed
program and obtain their support, It is envisioned that the Authority will launch a pilot
program in 2002 and, provided that the pilot is successful, the Authority could proceed to
implement the program on a watershed wide basis in 2003,
~.
. LSEMS
2001 lSEMS Year End Report
Rev. January 15, 2002
3. Developing and Delivering a Communication Strategy
Communications have been identified as an extremely important activity under Phas~ III,
Efforts to raise public awareness, which had been successful during Phase I (period
between 1990 to 1995), were largely discontinued in Phase 1\ due to funding contraints. A
heightened public awareness is essential to ensure continued public support and community
action. A communications work plan was developed by the Authority for review and
implementation in 2001. The foundation of this workplan was a Lake Simcoe Symposium,
which was held at Georgian College in Barrie on June 20, 2001. Three technical reports
were also produced in 2001,
4. Identifying a preferred option for treatment of pump-off water from the Holland Marsh
and developing funding proposals for submission through OSTAR and other
programs in partnership with the Lake Simcoe Foundation,
All the Polders (Holland, Colbar, Keswick, and Bradford) contribute between 3 and 8 metric
tonnes of phosphorus to Lake Simcoe every year (based on data from 1982 to 1998). Past
efforts to reduce loading from these marsh areas have met with little success, A working
group was established and met on November 24th to discuss the problems and investigate
pollution control measures and options. This working group is being chaired by Mr, AI Duffy
of the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Foundation and includes technical experts from
across the province from federal, provincial and municipal government agencies long with
individuals from the private sector who are volunteering their time.
Several possible solutions were identified during the "think-tank" session, which are being
investigated further. A submission under the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural
Affairs "New Directions in Agri-Food & Rural Research Program" is being prepared to
provide funding for pilot projects within the various polder areas,
The Foundation has already received $500,000 towards the proposed project from private
donors to be used to initiate of best management practices to reduce phosphorus loading.
Next steps involve working with the farming community to get their input and participation in
the process and then further investigating proposed solutions, The proposed plan to apply
to OST AR for funding has been effectively put on hold until a preferred solution to control
phosphorus from the polders is adopted,
5. Developing a rural water quality project proposal for submission to the Ontario
Healthy Futures Program.
A proposal to obtain funding has been produced and submitted to OMAFRA on November
20th. 2001, for consideration for funding under the Healthy Futures for Ontario Agriculture
Program, The program will be a joint partnership between the watershed municipalities,
LSRCA, OMAFRA, and the York and Durham Region and Simcoe County chapters of the
Ontario Federation of Agriculture, The proposal requests approximately $750,000 in funding
to be matched by municipal and landowner contributions to complete 275 rural water quality
n....""""..... r') ....+. c:
,/
~i-.,,~,
~J
LSEMS
2001 LSEMS Year End Report
Rev. January 15, 2002
projects. A communications\promotional campaign is also planned along with a water
quality monitoring program to ascertain the effectiveness of the completed projects,
Implementation of the watershed wide project could commence in January of 2002 upon
confirmation of the funding and will conclude in March of 2003. The total potential
phosphorous reduction would be 3.5 tonnes annually from this program.
6. Monitoring
Monitoring of the water quality and fish community of Lake Simcoe is ranked among the top
seven priorities by the LSEMS Technical Committee because monitoring data provides the
best information on the health of the Lake Simcoe ecosystem. A monitoring working group
was formed in 2001 and had their first meeting on October 23rd. The monitoring working
group is presently developing an overall monitoring framework for future discussion, Other
project specific activities completed are listed below,
In 2001, the Ministry of the Environment's Biomonitoring Section provided a comprehensive
lake-wide assessment of nutrient status, plankton, temperature and dissolved oxygen. This
was achieved through a continuation of the main lake and water intake sampling routines
established in previous years, An additional atmospheric station was also established in the
Township of Oro-Medonte and negotiations to locate another are on going with the First
Nations on Georgina Island. (In addition to the lake assessment, MOE completed an
analysis of 1990-1998 total phosphorous loading to Lake Simcoe and two reports were
published).
Fisheries monitoring activities were also conducted by the Lake Simcoe Fisheries
Assessment Unit of the Ministry of Natural Resources and included summer index and
winter creel surveys, angler catch sampling, and summer and fall index trapnetting
programs. These ongoing programs continue to describe trends in warm and coldwater
fishes and the response to stressors such as angling, eutrophication, invading species and
habitat degradation,
Efforts to enhance the Tributary Monitoring program in 2001 were achieved through a
renewed partnership between the Conservation Authority, municipalities and the Ministry of
the Environment. Further improvements are necessary to quantify loadings and qualify
individual phosphorus sources throughout the watershed, which will be completed by the
Authority.
A working group co-chaired by MNR and MOE has been established to recommend any
revisions to the program and ensure progress is achieved, A detailed work plan will be
provided upon completion of these discussions for 2002.
n__.... <") _,t r
. LSEMS
2001 LSEMS Year End Report
Rev. January 15, 2002
7. Lake Simcoe Watershed Plan -"State of the Watershed Report"
As part of the new approach adopted under LSEMS Phase III emphasis will be placed on
protecting existing natural resources within the watershed from further degradation due to
human activities, The "State of the Watershed Report" represents the first step of the
watershed planning process and is well underway. A working group led by the LSRCA and
MNR has been established, The draft Terms of Reference for the State of the Watershed
Report were approved at the first meeting held on October 25th along with a data gap
analysis, Data collection is now underway and the next steps include the identification of
performance indicators, data analysis and report production.
8. LEAP
Through the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority's funding program (Landowner
Environmental Assistance Program), seventeen projects were completed throughout the
wateshed that will benefit local surface water quality, and ultimately, the health of Lake
Simcoe.
Below is a brief description of the 2001 projects, A map of the project locations is attached.
Of these projects, four dealt with farm waste and nutrient management. Three were manure
storage facilities, and one was a combined manure and milkhouse waste management
facility. The waste from these livestock operations will now be managed more effectively,
reducing potential nutrient enrichment and bacterial contamination of local waterways,
These projects were located in Bradford, Sunderland, Pefferlaw and Schomberg (King)
(Georgina) (Brock).
Two agricultural landowners worked with the Authority to install fencing (Oro-Medonte,
Uxbridge) along local watercourses to restrict their livestock access, Alternate watering
supplies were also constructed and installed to ensure that the animals continued to have
safe water to drink. Reducing the livestock's access to the watercourse will help to limit the
amount of trampling and bank erosion, as well as the potential input of bacteria and
nutrients from the cattle's faecal matter.
Ten of the remaining projects involved streambank and lakeshore erosion control, and
enhancement of a native vegetation zone adjacent to the watercourses, Various
bioengineering techniques were used to stabilize the banks in each of the projects. These
techniques employ live, woody vegetation (native species) and other natural materials to
provide bank structure and encourage the re-vegetation of the erosion sites, As the shrubs
become established, they will provide soil stability through their root development, and will
also shade the stream to maintain cool water temperatures, and provide in-stream cover
with their over-hanging branches. Because phosphorus adheres to soil particles, reduction
of soil erosion from these sites will also reduce the amount of phosphorus entering the
waterways, and ultimately, Lake Simcoe, Two projects were located in the Town of Aurora,
n...._.... It "'. r:
,n /f
ls q - ---f'
LSEMS
2001 LSEMS Year End Report
Rev. January 15. 2002
one was in the Town of East Gwillimbury, one in the Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville, one in
Beaverton, and five were in Newmarket. Overall, more than 600 m of eroding streambank
on the East Holland River system, and the shore of Lake Simcoe were stabilized, and the
adjacent bank vegetation was enhanced to buffer the watercourses.
The last project was the retrofitting of an existing stormwater pond in the Township of
Uxbridge, An existing stormwater pond in the Township of Uxbridge was identified through
a stormwater management report, as one that should have improved effectiveness at
treating stormwater for sediment reduction. As a result, a design is being developed for an
additional filtration unit to be added to treat the effluent water from the stormwater pond,
This project will be completed in 2002.
Through the seventeen environmental projects undertaken this year, member municipalities,
local interest groups and private landowners were able to participate in land and water
stewardship initiatives with a value of more than $300,000, These works are expected to
help to reduce the nutrient and sediment loading that enters Lake Simcoe on an annual
basis, Through a modelling exercise, it is estimated that the flow of approximately 370 kg of
phosphorus to Lake Simcoe will be reduced from these projects per year.
I""'),ro.......... C ......$. t:
'8h-1
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
OFFICE OF THE TOWNSHIP PLANNER
I
IREPORT TO COUNCIL
REPORT NO.: PD2002-14
COUNCIL
PREPARED BY: Andria Leigh
C.OFW.
DATE: March 19,2002
MOTION
SUBJECT:
Parkland Appraisal for DATE
Draft Approved Horseshoe Valley
Estate Subdivision (43-0M-20011)
Concession 4, Part of Lots 1 and 2 (Oro)
I
IBACKGROUND/SUMMARY
At the Janu(lry 9, 2002 Committee of the Whole Meeting, a planning report was presented in
regards to rniline revisions to the above noted estate residential plan of subdivision. One of
the matter" discussed in this report was an amendment to the parkland dedication being
requested .1!1d the requirement for cash-in-lieu of parkland to be obtained for a portion of the
required 5"" dedication.
Block 15 ()I1 the draft approved plan was selected as a parkland dedication because the lands
are high (lf1<..l "uited for the siting of picnic tables and benches for use by area residents to take
in the vil'\\'-, to the north, It was intended that the remainder of the parkland dedication
would be \ ,t,t,lined as cash-in-lieu to be utilized towards other park facilities within the area,
The Planning Act stipulates that for the purposes of determining the amount of any payments
required tpr parkland dedication, the value of the land shall be determined as of the day
before the day of the approval of the draft plan of subdivision, Approval of the draft plan of
subdivision was given on June 20, 2001, At that time the property was designated Horseshoe
Valley Low Density Residential but was still zoned Agricultural/Rural Exception to restrict
the use of land, subject site was vacant, until a rezoning application was considered by
Council. The property is a total of 23,91 acres in area,
~.o
The applicant has completed an appraisal of the property and has submitted a copy to the
Township for consideration, The relevant portion of the appraisal is attached for Council's
reference (complete copy of appraisal located in Development Application File P-I09jOO). The
appraisal indicates the value of the subject property as of June 19, 2001 is $ 425,000,00 and
would appear to be appropriate given the development status of the property at that time,
Block 15 which is being dedicated to the Township represents a land dedication of 2.05% and
therefore the applicant is required to contribute 2.94 % as cash-in-lieu of parkland which
translates into an amount of $ 12,495,00
IRECOMMENDATION
~
It is recommended that:
1, This report be received and adopted;
2. That Horseshoe Valley Lands Ltd, be required to pay $ 12,495.00 as cash in-lieu of parkland
together with the dedication of Block 15 to the Township to satisfy the draft plan condition
in regards to Subdivision File 43-0M-20011, being Concession 4, Part of Lots 1 and 2 (Oro).
3, That the Planner advise Horseshoe Valley Lands Ltd" in writing, of Council's decision.
Respectfully submitted,
-1 ~ --igL
Andria Leigh, MCIP,RPP
Township Planner
c.A.O. COMMENTS:
DATE: I
O~.
c.A.O.
LO V\-.~
J
DEPT,HEAD
"Robin Jones B.Se., AACI, P.App. Real Estate Appraisals & Consulting
7 Lakeview Cres. Barrie, ON L4M 1N6 705-735-6030 Fax: 705-734-0296 Web Site: www.robinjones.net
" '., r.r ..' '. ......... '.,'.'",...... . Page Tof3T
?h0
SHORT NARRATIVE APPRAISAL REPORT
AND VALUATION ANALYSIS
OF A VACANT LAND PROPERTY
DESIGNATED IN THE OFFICIAL PLAN AS
HORSESHOE VALLEY LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
WITH APPROX, 23.91 ACRES
LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS
PART OF LOTS 1 & 2, CONCESSION 4,
BEING PARTS 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,10,13,14, 16, 18, 19, AND 20
PLAN 51 R-30780, FORMER TOWNSHIP OF ORO,
NOW IN THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
PROVINCE OF ONTARIO
MUNICIPALLY KNOWN AS
HORSESHOE VALLEY RESORT LTD, LANDS
HIGHLAND DRIVE, HORSESHOE VALLEY, ONTARIO
EFFECTIVE DATE: JUNE 19,2001
INSPECTION DATE: FEBRUARY 21, 2002
PREPARED FOR
I
J
J
J .
HORSESHOE VALLEY RESORT LTD.
BOX 10 HORSESHOE VALLEY
RR#1 BARRIE, ON L4M 4Y8
,..............,.... .., ....................._.....,.....,......._...'.,...._'.....~'.....' .,'...~...~ ".......,....... ........... ..,..,....' ....'....,........................, .... .......... ',.. ...... ~~"" '.............. ".. .. =~
Robin Jones B.Sc" AACI, P.App.
Robin Jones B.Sc., AACI, P.App. Real Estate Appraisals & Consulting
7 Lakeview Cres. Barrie, ON L4M 1N6 705-735-6030 Fax: 705-734-0296 Web Site: www.robinjones.net
'."'.. '.m.. ,...'.Page2of3f
<....J/, Cl
[jo/ f
File Number: 0222-0012
March 15,2002
Horseshoe Valley Resort Ltd,
Box 10 Horseshoe Valley
RR#1 Barrie, ON L4M 4Y8
Attn: Mr. Martin Kimble
Re: Horseshoe VaHey Resort Ltd. Lands - Highland Drive,
Horseshoe Valley, Township of Oro-Medonte
Dear Mr. Kimble:
In compliance with your request, I have inspected the property known municipally as the
Horseshoe Valley Resort Ltd, lands on Highland Drive in Horseshoe Valley, in the
Township ofOro-Medonte, Ontario. For the purposes of this appraisal the legal description
of the subject property is said to be Part of Lots 1 & 2, Concession 4, Township ofOro-
Medonte being parts 2,3,4,5,6, 7, 8, 10. 13. 14. 16, 18, 19, and 20 of Plan 51R-30780,
Consideration was given to factors and forces that influence the property value as of the
effective date of June 19,2001. The effective date is deemed to be the point in time that is
the day before draft plan approval of the aforementioned lands but, for the purposes of this
appraisal, after the official plan amendment designating the lands as "Low Dem~ity
Residential".
The purpose of this Short Narrative Appraisal Report is to estimate the market value of the
subject property in Fee Simple Interest, The function of this appraisal report is for
information purposes to be used in determining a park levy due to the municipality,
The subject property is described as a vacant land property zoned Agricultural/ Rural
(A/RU* 15) and designated in the official plan as "Low Density Residential" that
encompasses an area of approximately 23.91 acres (9,676461 ha) and has frontage on
Highland Drive of approximately 1,475,89 feet (449.85 metres),
There are no extraordinary assumptions that may affect the value of the subject property
expressed herein, This appraisal is subject to the following extraordinary limiting
condition:
-------
..~.,. "'.... _u ''''''_ ..'"
""" ,..."",",,"^, ...'""",.....~v; ."
Robin Jones B,Sc., AACI, P,App.
..~-_..
-
-
- Robin Jones B.Sc., AACI, P.App. Real Estate Apptaisals & Consulting ~
7 Lakeview Cres. Barrie, ON L4M lN6 705-735-6030 Fax: 705-734-0296 Web Site: www.robinjones.net
- - , ..,..,...,.. ",.......' ...........,..... .'.. ,.... .....,.............,......,....,..'"
. , Page 3 of31
The subject property is a compilation and remainder of several properties owned
by Horseshoe Valley Resort Ltd. and/or related companies and as such is not
separately deeded or described as of the effective date. Although registered plan
51 R-30780 was registered after the effective date, it best describes the subject
property and is used for the purposes of describing the subject property for this
appraisal. It is a condition of this appraisal that title to the subject property is
marketable.
Based on my analysis of the data collected, it is my opinion that the estimated market value
of the subject property as of the effective date of June 19,2001 is:
$425,000
FOUR HUNDRED AND TWENTY -FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS
The above value estimate is considered during the calculation of a park levy due to the
municipality. Block 15 of the plan has already been accepted by the municipality as part of
the 5% dedication and represents some 2.06% (area of Block 15 at 1990,06 sq m divided
by total subdivision area of96794,61 sq m = 2,06%) leaving some 2.94% to be accounted
for,
Based on the value estimate of some $425,000, as of the effective date of June 19,
2001,.this translates to a park levy due of some $12,495.
The value expressed herein is based on an exposure period of three months,
The attached report contains 31 pages plus 2 addenda in support of my findings,
Should I be able to be of further assistance in this matter, please do not hesitate to contact
me.
",
Y ours truly
Robin Jones
J
J
]
1 .
""
,... ..."'<"""~,,,^<,,,....,-,,, <.. .~.. ."",-' -""",-",,,,,,,-',,,,",,,,.-. """',^-",
'k<"-,"",,"'''''''''''''~''_''''''''' ,_"""",<""",,,,,,,,,,,,,;.,,,-,,,,~,,,,,,~,,,,,,,,,,,,,~.,,,,,,,<~,,
,"""'"""-,..,_w,,,,,,....,,..
..~~..
-~~
Robin Jones B.Se" AACI, P .App,
1
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
FROM THE TOWNSHIP PLANNER
REPORT TO COUNCIL
REPORT NO.: PD2002-15
COUNCIL
PREPARED BY: Andria Leigh
C. OF W.
DATE: March 19, 2002
MOTION
SUBJECT:
Proposed Rezoning DATE
For Trinity Community
Presbyterian Church
Concession 7,Part of Lot 21 (Oro)
Development Application P-I04jOl
I BACKGROUND/ANAL YSIS
An Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment application for a
church with associated facilities on the above noted property was submitted on
June 21, 2001. The property is located within the Oro Centre Secondary Plan area
and the County of Simcoe approved Official Plan Amendment # lIon July 12,
2001. The effect of the Amendment would be to permit the church to locate on
the above noted property prior to the completion of the Oro Centre
Industrial/Commercial Secondary Plan,
The applicant's subsequent to the adoption of the Official Plan Amendment have
been working towards the completion of the required Site Plan Agreement
including the appropriate sewage servicing and stormwater management
requirements. On March 20,2002 Council adopted the Site Plan Agreement for
this facility by By-law 2002-028,
I n summary, the proposed church facility conforms to the policies of the Official
Plan specifically adopted through Official Plan Amendment #11, The Zoning By-
law Amendment would allow for the construction of the facility to begin in
accordance with those provisions and would be adopted in accordance with the
policies of the Official Plan, A public meeting has been held in accordance with
the requirements of the Planning Act and all concerns have been addressed,
0~yt I"
AL,' , r
\-..i
I
/
s~ .'/
dC"
It is therefore recommended that the attached Zoning By-law Amendment to
rezone the subject property located in Concession 7, Part of Lot 21, being Parts 1
and 2, on Plan 51R-30031, being all of PIN # 58550-0170 (Lt) and 58550-0181 (Lt)
from the Agricultural/Rural Exception (A/RU*32) Zone to the Institutional (I)
Zone be approved,
I
IRECOMMENDA TION
It is recommended that:
1. This report be received and adopted;
2. That the Clerk bring forward the appropriate Zoning By-law Amendment for
the Trinity Community Presbyterian Church for Council's consideration.
Respectfully submitted,
-A-L -i-yL
Andria Leigh, Hons B.A"AMCT, MCIP,RPP
Township Planner
c.A.O. car-.l , 11 \:TS:
DATE:
~~ /O--:Y'
I t
/ A...u--
l,j----y--L
C.A.o,
l?J
DEn.HEAD
6d .1
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
FROM THE TOWNSHIP PLANNER
~EP~_RTT~L~OU~CIL
I
REPORT NO.:
PD2002-16
COUNCIL
PREP ARED BY:
Andria Leigh
C.OFW.
DATE:
March 19, 2002
MOTION
SUBJECT:
Committee of Adjustment
Decisions for March 14, 2002
DATE
I SUMMARY
I
Attached are the Planning Reports and Committee of Adjustment Decisions for the Consent
and Minor Variance applications that were heard at the Committee of Adjustment meeting held
on March 14, 2002, The last date for receiving an appeal to the above noted decisions is
Wednesday April 3, 2002.
Consent Applications
Minor Variance Applications
B-7/02 The Township ofOro-Medonte
Con 11, Lot 13 (Medonte)
67 & 73 Eady Station Road
A-5/02 Ron & Nancy Barr
Con 12, W Half Lot 15 (Oro)
1502 15/16 Side Road East
A-6/02 1091402 Ontario Limited
Con 1, Plan M-633,
Lot 12 (Oro)
28 Northwood Court
Respectfully submitted,
-"--1~ ~.
Andria Leigh, Hans B.A.,AMCT, MCIP,RPP
Township Planner
c.A.O.
DATE:
C.A.o, COMMENTS:
DEPT.HEAD
e
<6ot ~2f/
Committee of Adjustment
Planning Report
March 14,2002
The Township of Oro-Medonte
B-7/02
Con. 11, South Part Lot 13, (former Medonte)
67 Eady Station Road
The Proposal
The applicant is proposing a lot addition to an adjacent parcel of land. The land to be
conveyed has a lotfrontage of 41 metres (135 feet), and a lot area of 0,32 hectares (0.79
acres). The land will be added to a lot that has a lot area of 0.10 hectares (0.25 acres)
and is currently used for the Eady Community Hall.
Policy
Official Plan Designation:
Zoning By-law:
Agricultural
Agricultural/Rural (A/RU) Zone
Comments
Roads Superintendent:
Building Department:
No Concerns
No Concerns
Planning Department Comments
Official Plan
The subject property is designated Agricultural the Township's Official Plan, The general
intent
ofthe policies is to preserve the agricultural lands of the Township and to maintain the
open countryside, No new lot will be created, therefore this application would be deemed
to generally confonn to the policies ofthe Official Plan.
Zoning By-law
The subject property is zoned Agricultural/Rural (A/RU) in the Township's Zoning By-
law 97-95, as amended. The new lot would appear to comply with the Zoning By-law
provisions for lot ftontage and lot area requirements,
I
<2 cA -3
...
Recommendation
It is recommended that Consent Application B-7/02 be GRANTED subject to the
standard list of conditions.
Decision
Moved by, Ken Robbins seconded by Dave Edwards
"That the Committee hereby GRANT Application B-7/02 subject to the following
conditions:
1. That the Township ofOro-Medonte Building Department approves of the
application, in writing,
2. That three copies of a Reference Plan ofthe subject lands prepared by an
Ontario Land Surveyor be submitted to the Committee Secretary or
appropriate registerable description.
3, That three copies of deeds be submitted to the Committee Secretary to be
stamped using Form 2 as prescribed in the Planning Act.
4, That all Municipal taxes be paid to the Municipality.
5. That the conditions of consent imposed by the Committee be fulfilled within
one year from the date of giving ofthis notice.
" ".Carried"
2
~)
C6J~
1\
dz
-..JI
:!:,.
<(.- ~
~
<
r
cJ)
......
~
<D
~
fII1'
I
I
--
/
r. ,.1"'--. -
'6 O"~ ",v
If
\
\~l
cr
\ ".
\~. ~
~ i
c~ \-
\ ~ .~
"-..:'s::;cs;;:.
\..
\.
1)$ '.
..,
'il
c,.
c, "''''IJ
Co '4111
1',. IV
"co
"'a
~
~CI
It I:-IC
c.
~.
, "
, .
, \
....
~
o.
.
.. .....
It
."r "-
I.t
i~
~
/
-.;'
t::-
1;'~/)'r'
...
. "'I
~.
\.
1!..
e
'b\~
.l\ ~
c!:.
o
'\
~
(,~ITO~
.~ '''1 D
~
.. '''''0
~o J ....,e-
It,
~ "'0:. G
'" -c> () ~
..J~' "
"Z.."'"'u
c'"'
~ ....
,~\
'f..4t
."
.
-0 '
.'
o . .
~. '~
~~""'
.
.
\ ~
\ ~
'!
~..
~
.~.
" s
\-
., .
, :.
\: ...-
&
..
",.
...
~
e::
o-P.
.,,""
~ ~~.. 1
". .,..,.V-~.."
".'''''' ... .
.",. ..,....
,..
,~,. -
<?
~
.
0"
cio
t-
~c
"
....""
."
~':
...
. .
..-
.."
'i ~ ".\-
~..
..
W
....a
<<.
t,,)
In.
~
'...\
\1'~
~?')
,. ,\
\
~
..
t. '
e
"f...
\\/
.
Committee of Adjustment
Planning Report
March 14,2002
~JJy
Ron and Nancy Barr
A-5102
Cone, 12, West Half of Lot 15 (former Township of Ora)
1502 15/16 Sideroad E.
The Proposal
The applicant is requesting relief from the maximum floor area for a detached garage from
70 square metres (753,5 square feet) to 96.6 square metres (1040 square feet). Reliefis
also need for the maximum height requirement for a detached garage from 4,5 metres (14, 7
feet) to 4.88 metres (16feet).
Policy
Official Plan Designation:
Zoning By-law:
Rural Settlement Area
Residential One (R1) Zone
Comments
Roads Superintendent: No Concerns
Building Department: Construction of new 26 by 40 garage is required to be setback ITom
septic tile bed minimum 5 metres (16.4 feet).
Planning Department Comments
], Does the variance conform with the general intent of the Official Plan?
The subject property is designated Rural Settlement Area in the Township's Official
Plan. The general intent ofthe policies to maintain and create attractive communities
with suitable amenities and to ensure that settlement areas are developed in a logical and
cost-effective manner, The proposed construction of a detached garage would not appear
to affect the community as it will be replacing an existing accessory building, On tl1is
basis, the application would appear to conform with the general intent ofthe policies of
the Official Plan.
2. Does the variance conform with the general intent of the Zoning By-law?
The subject property is zoned Residential One (Rl) in the Township's Zoning By-law 97-
95, as amended. The intent of the By-law is to establish setback requirements, which
""
1
bd ,1-
assist in preserving the residential character, The proposed garage would enlarge the
height and square footage of the garage for the applicants desired look and use, The ·
proposed variance would appear to maintain the intent of the Zoning By-law provisions,
3. Is the variance desirable for the appropriate development of the lot?
Upon site inspection it is evident that the garage would not appear to affect any of the
surrounding neighbours as a tree line buffers the neighbours on the west and the property
to the east is vacant. The detached accessory building will be replacing an older structure
that is currently on the lot; therefore the variance would be desirable on the lot.
4. Is the variance minor in nature?
The proposed variance is considered minor in nature on the basis that the variance would
not appear to affect any surrounding neighbours.
Recommendation
It is recommended that Minor Variance Application A-SI02 be approved subject to the
standard conditions of approvaL
Decision
Moved by, Dave Edwards seconded by, Al Pross
"That the Committee hereby GRANT Minor Variance Application A-SI02 subject to the
following conditions:
1. That the building department verifies the height and building area approved by the
. ,
mmor vanance,
2. That the setbacks be in conformity with the dimensions as set out in the application, as
submitted;
3. That the Township ofOro-Medonte Building Department approve of the application, in
writing;
4. That the appropriate building permit be obtained from the Township's Chief Building
Official only after the Committee's decision becomes final and binding, as provided
for within the Planning Act R.S.O, 1990, c,P, 13;
5. That all municipal taxes be paid to the Township ofOro-Medonte
,. ,..Carried."
2
'vi
.....
/ PLAN MATERIAL
PLASTIC MATERIAL - MYLAR
~GE -0.OO3INCH
'mK - 50 SPECIAL
.
iI'
/*--
..~~
/
,/'
/
./
i
I
I
1
1'~ Bl
11113901 :
--._-_._---*-
/.B
11390)
J
{/
....' '.
..
...
'"
..
..
,':/ST: ."'19
6490:'0
'..
..
'"
..
N
,0 I~ IT ~.-.
~
~
~
,
I
,~I,,-;J,,".' 5/,'-;"-6;'86
o
Z
<!
...
0 ..
'"
..
..
-
L
".)
<rJ
\C'
~,
\'\.'
~\.!
'1///--'
I. I I r....
(/)
z
o
(/)
(/)
w
u
Z
o
u
Z
w
w
3:
~
w
CD
, ..
,~
(1390) I
\~
I
I
I
o :;;
'" 0
N ..
N
-I.,)
oq:
"-
IV)
1-"-
c)
Q:: "
q"'t
Q.~
"'t
tH
-.
...--
... - 1\1"" ,-r-r '",} ,\1
:..., f....J, I '...... I:':' ,-J I' , J
o
-'
o
1 .
,- -
~)
-
w
u
Z
<!
3:
g
-I
<!
:/'1:;;: !'/ 11
/tJ?9'.:70
',>
.,
o
,
'"
L
o
<!
o
a::
"'62032'30"E
:)4GO'(OEEm
1.8 -51 e~'tME'ASI ....
FENt[ -
s ~ 16
~ . ~O~ I.'.'~..:, ...'~=
'!'~._I' a: . ..... ' ~ '. '- .'
.... wZ ~~; r:3 17' \
~I ~~ ~~~~ r-T~' COLO
I u..%II:IC) ~ Z STY "I SlORAGE
I ~b I FR & ALVM. .
! 1..J _.,... /.,gWEI..LING \0
\ j 2.15'" . ~ 1 ::
; . I /~ I. \
w..... fS HC. --
55 I a ~6'5'.i4~M-EAST
11390) 6381"OEE01
'.!l.9q4'l'~o"E
1129"
-;;;
~..
",'"
02
o'~
~~
N..
....
. ~
":."
e
~'
'~HCl-"\
12302
G' '51'tP~OP)
~ii.9ftOEEQ}
\
\
S ').1 6
\.
[
\
\
';:)
~
1<',
~o
.....
......
20
w
"
~~~
DiN
....
....
~
, 1:'7- 't..) i
I- i f...- I
--
-- "
\J) ( <>,
-. I .~
-, \
:- , "
Of
I.,)
C\joq:
~
(()
1-0
Q:: "
c::t"'t
Q.~ :;
"'t - 0
, ....)
It:...
'!'
..
'"
~
-.
"
...
'"
o
..
~..:
tr,
.::...:
--
\-~
l')
~
+Q~m~J&!"C
~
....
~
..
;0
c
o
'"
"'
...
.,
n l~,',O' ~
Z +:5.\5' r:\
~~ ...J..2~.6B'
# Z sn'.;
. . Ow G ,."
. 5" r. . 1
t~
~ ~ ~
! ~
o
"
o
co
<:?j
! ~
....
*,,- - p 5,
U~90~~f..,_., ,_;(.:
'..1."J.Qr::;:-::';"Eac~
'I'
64 ~<' tMEA5)
58.:t!'{OEEO)
H'.)":)042'40"E
,e
R 0 A 0 /...
u..
:'0
< '..
".,
,56
~
~ A LLOWANCE BETWEEN
( 20. 117 W I DE )
A~
LOTS
15
td/
i' ,
1'-
I
I
~ >j
:0
o
)::>
o
r"(H
041' "
lH(tl _
0,..'
~ 24'
)>
r
r
o
~
)>
~Z
Nn
OfTl
-.J(IJ
fT1
~-I
-~
OfTl
fTlfTl
-Z
. "
f~ () A [)
~~
..-
~;.
,a.':"::-- _H.. 3~:~
t,... __,Sw CORNER
LOTI5,CON.12
...: :t>~
U'...,t.'
... .
,.:z,N.
"-,,
,01-'--1
"," 0 r:~
0"'''''
,~..
t"IOU'l'
--I
.-- F[Ne [
, ~~~~:r;&~~:. ;
i 81.05'."[AS..
- """'Ji1 ~..z
/1% ~,6!'o", ~.. ~ ... ~,. \t\
n ~ 2JN ::'1';'.-, ; ::g"':
~ O'v. _' ";-.,", t'\ -"...:~
,.. JIo =1 I 1'.' '" I:O~
~,.. . .... f....~-::' "''''0
i ~ If, ;2";
"
"
"
~
'"
'"
'"
,
'"
,~
..
".
N30"~7'IO'W
;:[-5''''''' -"l~~~
... o. -
-0'" ~ N .... c;
,,'" .
...'.:- ." \L~ J
'" 4", 1'~i71'
tb
'"
ZVlm
VQ':""
"'.
,,'.UN
.,.._N
N _"....:
iO~
O~~
,,;~ ~.. .....-.
r
o
-I
(j)
U1
;t->
-:J'
.'
I\L l O\'I MJC E
BETWEEN CONCESSIONS
N~I'J02'~l.r'w
c)
:; \ _I
-. ~
a -.;::.
." ~'I ~-
\0 ()
\r,
1.:', 1'-1
~
'" (-"
(j)
C)
-.:>
....-
----r
I
I \1"" w,_
D",~"", ,'/::
;,~ >_ PART 2
iLL-:,~.. ,RE A = O. 67S'Ac,
OLD
f PO$1 . 5e '.
n r t'lIbH -
'"
~ .
09 r IC u rtur-o I
OlO
~
POST
~~I
~.J..
,\/::
1",.... "" ,.. ;, ~
":''':'I''C'~'
'\1""'-
II.";' I.
PART
AREA =0.731
I
Ac.
,.", Ie
,I I, \J
b
\.
Nfl
II
,-
.....
"
,
i'.)
8
"'31" ~e' 30" w
WI Rf
j-
'-'
- I
-,
wlF'lf.
~-
Uj
AND
12
---.. -~~:.._[
-III
~, ~~
-- "'-
, _ e '"
!.. _ a ~ I 18'---1
.~ ,0 ~ '.'\ I
J" \(I ~i i
C,
'.>1
1.:', '..
~
(_Ii ::u
:G -.;
,
0)
-~
I))
v)
:6~a3'
FEN \".E
..;62.\1':;
466.84'
I DEED)
(... e: ASd
fo't It (t:
468.'S""EAS)
462 Gu' (DEE Of
'.
'~,
.,#.,
,':3 8/ 0 _..-~
-...
;~
.,.,
z
"
'"
i
...-:
,
!
/
"
t
!
r:;.()
~
"-
.~
.,
'.
.
Committee of Adjustment
Planning Report
March 14, 2002
/1)
qd'\V
.
1091402 Ontario Limited
A-6/02
Cone. 1, Plan M-633, Lot 12 (former Township of Oro)
28 Northwood Court
The Proposal
The applicant is requesting relief from the minimum interior side yard setback for a single
family dwelling from 8 metres (26.2feet) to 6.99 metres (22.9 feet), Reliefis also needed
for the minimum front yard setback for the dwelling from 15 metres (49.2feet) to 13.28
metres (43,6 feet),
Policy
Official Plan Designation:
Zoning By-law:
Rural Residential
Rural Residential One (RURl) Zone
Comments
Roads Superintendent: No Concerns
BuiJding Department: Ensure engineered lot grading plan for lot reflects changes in
setbacks as per minor variance approval, required with application
for single family dwelling
Planning Department Comments
1 . Does the variance conform with the general intent of the Official Plan?
J h\: subject property is designated Rural Residential in the Official Plan. The intent
(\t the Rural Residential Designation is to recognize existing estate, country estate and
chalet residential developments in the Township, The application would appear to
conform with the general intent of the policies of the Official Plan as it is located within a
Registered Plan of Subdivision in a country estate setting,
2. Does the variance conform with the general intent of the Zoning By-law?
The subject property is zoned Rural Residential One (RURl) in Zoning By-law 97-95,
The proposed variance would pennit construction of a single detached dwelling, which is
aJready built to be located 6.99 metres (22,9 feet) away ITom the interior side yard instead
..
..
,........ f' I \
( ~ y~\ .
ofthe required 8 metres (26.2 feet) and relief from the minimum front yard setback from D\./ '
15 metres (49.2 feet) to 13,28 metres (43.6 feet), The proposed variance confoffi1s with ,.
the general intent of the Zoning By-law.
3. Is the variance desirable for the appropriate development of the lot?
Upon site inspection it is evident that the proposed construction of the single detached
dwelling would be desirable on lot, as it would be buffered ITom the neighbouring
properties by several trees or sparse bush,
4. Is the variance minor in nature?
The proposed variance is considered minor in nature, as it would appear to have no effect
on the surrounding neighbours.
Recommendation
It is recommended that application A-6/02 be Granted subject to the standard list of
conditions.
Decision
Moved by, Al Pross seconded by, Ken Robbins
"That the Committee hereby GRANT Minor Variance Application A-6/02 subject to the
following conditions:
1, That an Ontario Land Surveyor provide verification to the Township of compliance
with the Committee's decision by 1) pinning the footing and 2) verifying in writing
prior to pouring of the foundation by way of survey/real property report prepared by
an Ontario Land Surveyor,
2, That the setbacks be in confonnity with the dimensions as set out in the application, as
submitted;
3. That the Township of Oro-Medonte Building Department approve of the application, in
writing;
4, That the appropriate building permit be obtained from the Township's Chief Building
Official only after the Committee's decision becomes final and binding, as provided
for within the Planning Act R.S,O. 1990, c.P, 13;
5. That all municipal taxes be paid to the Township ofOro-Medonte
.. ...Carried,"
.
2
""
't
<.'<>, 10 .....05"'.1<0 D~ .oR ....oR "......ct
.01 '\ Z ,\\.\_633
~EG\S1E~EO ^~~O:\.\EOot'&1E
,.O~S""p V1 v''''
COUl'ti'< of SI,,^COE.
SC~\.t \' '150 '" ~.tr"
, 0 ' ,0 ,'j-..
~-
.,,,,,,_tC SIJl'l".IE~NG \.'0.
tPl-t11 !t ....- - "" .
'100'1
~ '. Iol4O 'OW'Ll. 110" et u<,;tO
,IIISI'I> 1101 ,,~...~~~'EO ~ 'nit 1in.E lI\.ct\(.
E'JICtv' rOIl lilt r~.r'"
@ _ !;t{(1C1\ I'!> p1\OIEClEO If( C~.
t-I01E
~t1C1\ .s ~p~tO fll~$'':~
tIL~1EO ~f()lllllo~'o/t 110' ettl\ 'o/tII,flf.\),
s~.\)ISt~
fEII~~
~
..c1'R\C _.w ~ 11\ lIEI!!t5 ,...0
~5 ~ ()It ,\\15 YV-' ~:.ndIG If( 0.3048
c;it &t c()IfIE1t1EO 10 rEEl ITi 1JI'f""'"
Ltrr :,B.
---
~_ _ _ ./,'r .~.,.
1.\1' ..~..
----
i~i:(,lsn:Hi:l)
;.:i; ()Ci< 'f"" ~5
,,;;;. 585:;,I..001;lj (
~
\
"-
'------
(PII.11 ~ 'II()ROBlC SIIM-'I\IIG l"\1)
()CI\or\O lGnd sune'P' lI>II"\t .' \.41\ .,.z
., ..,JEt' 5OJ,1\ .- ~\, It ;~ . t11t!>\ 122 . 6Ir.I~
"ft~ . 6222 t -w>\\. . .........v.y4..C....
~'"
GONGf::;SiON
[~.P .:~.
----
---
----- ...,,;.;P
(;01'1 C:::;:;I 01'1 . t..: ....
I'AlIT 2. 5'1?.2,,'96
I'IN !l8!i:l~~""21 Ol'
f.~ ·
NORTHWOO>>
P!../..J,j
r It?'1 ~
LO "\..OOt '''..~
"'8:>'" :::,.. ,
pIN"
M68'U'30.t
_..'3t1: _tll(lCI:__
--
------
",
--
61.28 ~
.~3'3~ ~.~ (\;;:.-- \\
~
':.
; ~ ! ~
>
~
"'Hi;:
~
(fit, $In
76.00
Rf:GiSTf:RF:D PLA.'! 5Wnt;JJ
pm 58SJ4..0134
COURT
"...
. ,,-," 1-':
t,~:. '... ...: -t')
PiN ;)/);).,.1-.....0.-
N68'H'JO'(
~IPI~
uuo"'.._....
S 1 $ $
;II ~ ~ to
4=- - LLI 1- jL
II I A-39.26 C-39.2:!-
~III ...,_..,
;~ I 1>166'.2'101: R-551.50
. I
I
1i,1
--L
..~ "':: .~
,..~;.';"_!;"J\-'\
..~: ....
-'
\~
\
\\
...'OJ?
,...' G
\\
; ()T 14
pIN 585S4"OO!':;
--
- -- --- --
-c9
9-
::-