02 27 2002 COW Agenda
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
(c{_-D
I I
(J
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING AGENDA
DATE: WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 27,2002
TIME: 1 :00 p.m.
..
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
****************************************************************************************************
1. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA
2. DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST AND THE GENERAL NATURE
THEREOF: - "IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ACT"
3. RECEIPT OF ACCOUNTS:
Nil.
4. DEPUTATIONS:
a) 1 :00 p.m.
Ms. Bev Parcells re: dog control matters, Le. leashing, poop and
scoop.
b) 1:15 p.m.
Mr. Keith Sherman, Severn Sound Environmental Association, re:
water and sediment survey of Bass Lake, Township of Orc-
Medonte.
c) 1 :30 p.m.
Linda Northcott, Horseshoe Playground Group, re: playground in
Horseshoe Highlands Subdivision.
d) 1 :40 p.m.
Rick Dory, Horseshoe Valley, re: playground at Alpine Way and
Pod's Lane.
5. CORRESPONDENCE:
~
a) Ministry of Citizenship, correspondence re: volunteer recognition programs for 2002.
"
b) Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority, minutes of the January 25,2002
meeting.
c) Town of Bradford West Gwillimbury, correspondence re: County of Simcoe weighted
vote vs reduction in County Council composition.
d) Severn Sound Environmental Association, minutes of 2001 fourth quarter meeting,
January 25, 2002.
e) Easter Seal Society, correspondence re: Easter Seal month - March.
f) Township of Springwater, notice of Planning Act amendment re: Part Lot 64,
Concession 1,5394 Penetanguishene Road, Meinzinger.
"
g) Township of Springwater, notice of Planning Act amendment re: Part Lot 65,
Concession 1, 5410 Penetanguishene Road, Janda.
6. FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND FIRE:
a) Marilyn Pennycook, Clerk, discussion re: summer meeting schedule.
b) Report No. ADM2002-07, Marilyn Pennycook, Clerk, re: road name change, 5/6
Sideroad.
c) Jennifer Zieleniewski, CAO, discussion re: Oro-Medonte Chamber of Commerce
proposal.
7. PUBLIC WORKS:
a) Report No. ES2002-07, Keith Mathieson, Director of Engineering and Environmental
Services, re: draft "Water and Sediment Survey of Bass Lake", prepared by Mr.
Keith Sherman, Co-Ordinator of the Severn Sound Environmental Association.
b) Report No. ES2002-08, Keith Mathieson, Director of Engineering and Environmental
Services, re: request for streetlights on Bass Line.
8. PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT:
a) Oro-Medonte Planning Advisory Committee, minutes of the February 19, 2002
meeting.
...
9. COMMUNITY SERVICE:
-#
Nil.
10. ENVIRONMENTAL TASK FORCE:
Nil.
2
11. ADDENDUM:
12. IN-CAMERA:
.
a) Jennifer Zieleniewski, CAO, personnel matter.
b) Confidential Report No. PD2002-10, Andria Leigh, Township Planner, re: Ontario
Municipal Board Hearing for Minor Variance Application (Sneyd).
3
ADDENDUM
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING
Wednesday, February 27,2002
5. CORRESPONDENCE:
h) Peter Kurtz, Shanty Bay, correspondence re: "Poop and Scoop" by-law.
i) Walter and Phyllis Hutchinson, correspondence re: road condition, 5th Line
between the 15th and 16th Sideroad and Barrie Road.
j) Versha Szczebior, Shanty Bay, correspondence re: buffering/screening, 279
Line 4 South, Oro.
k) Nick McDonald, Meridian Planning Consultants, e-mail re: Gold Mountain
Springs.
6. FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND FIRE:
d) Report No. ADM2002-10, Tamara Obee, Assistant Treasurer, re: Treasurer's
Statement of Remuneration, 2001.
e) Jennifer Zieleniewski, CAO, documentation re: Community Hall Boards roles
and responsibilities.
f) Minutes of the Parkland Secondary Study public meeting of February 21,
2002.
*
..
8. PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT:
b) Committee of Adjustment decisions for February 14, 2002.
f/q -!
June & Ian Beard
From: "8. ParceUs" <bparcells@home.com>
To: <harry .hughes@township.oro-medonte.on.ca>
Cc: <ian.beard@township.oro-medonte.on.ca>
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 5:03 PM
Subject: Harbourwood Subdivision
I have resided in this subdivision for the past 2 years. It is a wonderful area ,however, there is a
vanderlism problem caused by a few individuals (young people) in our parks.I know for a fact that
it has been reported to the town, at a cost the town has had to make repairs. I believe if there was
a police presence during the evening and night less of this behaviour would occur.
J.
In addition there are dogs running loose everywhere. I have been at the school bus stop when out
of no where 5 dogsOarge) just appeared. I was glad I was there as some of the children were smaller
than the dogs. Some of the dogs were know ,none of the owners were present. Think of the possible
danger of one dog getting excited the rest foUoweing and the children became the target of their
excitement. All this on townshipproperty-Harbourwood Park. This is just one incident of many,
Dogs run astay at all hours. Garbage day is a feast. Bags are ripped, garbage ends up aU over the
place. My husband does not work on Mondays and in the last few months he has gathered up our
neihbours garbage rebaged it on a number of occasions,chased the dogs away ,to await the garbage
pick up, God for bid that the garbage person would have to gather up garbage other than what was
in a container. It could be right in front of them and they leave it. . There appearsto be no .
enforcement by the Township even though legislation exit. This is a serious problem, one 1 believe
the Township should be overseeing.
I would also like to recommend to Council that a By-Law be enacted that there be a "POOP and
SCOOp. by -law. This should pertain to aU subdivisions and aU Parks in the Township. Do you
know how many germs and parasites are spread by dog (animal) feces.? This is a Health and litter
issue. We see people walk their dogs to the park for the prime purpose for their animals to
defecate, leave the feces there and walk home, There are others that pick up after their dog then
throw the bag in the park. Every spring my husband has been able to collect a 3/4 fun wheelbarrow
wheelbarrow full of dog feces from in front of our yard by the roadway. In addition 1 request that
all parks have garbage containers. One should be placed at all entrances and a few within the Parks
depending on the park size. This is a simple request, one which exits in most cities and towns.
The above mentioned issues are an serious and I believe fan within the Township '5 responsibilties
and 1 am requesting that action be taken.
I would appreciate it if you would respond in writing.
Thank You
B. Parcells
38 Howard Drive
OroStation
487-3636.
COPy
'"
~
5/412001
fir, :
ORO-MEDONTE
REPORT OF INSPECTION
L/e; ~;}-
P.O. BOX 100, OR('\ .
ONlARIO LOL 2XO
TEL: (705) 487-2171
FAX: (705) 487-Q13:i
K~ ~- ~\
~
DATE:'-J~ \ -c\
t:iQIE: Inspections can ,
be called in
after hours
)I PERMIT NO: ~ - \'*
INSPECTION: O~~ L.
tta.r ~'-'oc
00' h,-
. ~-d1Y
o...r- <-
TAKE NOTICE: that you are required to comply with the following order(s):
! ..
~
, -
~
~u..b J: \ U
r"\...
....
~: ~~ "
:. ~ .,
q : =>0 ~ ~3c::r.
;).~
;l:e:.~ "
"
~: ~ It
L.
NOTE: A request for Reinspection is Required
.'!'
Received By:
Inspector: \Cal~ ~
~~~~
4 /
- 9: I;;
C'Ol'-
<~" ]/~j\~ ~~~
IJ .l'~/
--..
_..-..~.\~~t".i;r-~1~- " - - - - .' .....,-~~.
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
B. Parcells [bparcells@rogers.com]
Thursday, January 24, 2002 10:59 AM
ian.beard@township.oro-medonte.on.ca
Harry Hughes
By-Law( re Dogs-poop & scoop and leash )
---'
L ~-
.
',..,
On May 23,2001 a delegation from Harbourwood subdivision met with Council regarding dogs at
large in our neighbourhood. There was a lengthy discussion by the Council ,culminating with '
strong support from the Councillors for both a "poop & scoop" and leash By-Law. At that
time it was stated that the matter would be referred to staff for formulation. WE left with the
understanding that this should be accomplished within three(3) months. It is now January
24,2002 , nine (9) months since that meeting and to date no member of the delegation has
been contacted by the Township. Councillor Hughes I know during that time frame has brought
the matter to your attention and has queried the lack of action ,yet there is still no action. It would
appear there is a breakdown between Council and Township staff or perhaps just incapable staff
as this matter is not a complicated issue to address, and should in fact have been dealt
with within two (2) months.
It was my hope that a letter of this nature would not be necessary but recent incidents have led
me to alert you for the need of such a by-law. In the last couple of weeks while driving, my
husband, family and I have had near misses with three different dogs dashing out on to
the road and having to take evasive action. On two of those occasions narrowly evading
an accident. On the third incident after being frightened by the first two upon seeing the
darting dog I told my husband to hit the dog as our lives are worth more than his,
however he was able to stop the car in time as the road was dry unlike the first two
situations . Locations of the incidents were Howard 5t, Elvin 5t, and Lakeshore in the vicinity of
the marina.
In addition the dogs are loose again on garbage day, one in particular has a feast each of those
days, leaving a mess on the roadway.
If as stated by the various Councillors that they recognize this to be a serious problem in
their respected wards, it begs the question why has nothing been done?
B. Parcells! and The Harbourwood Delegation
""
..
Horseshoe Plavground Group
...
c/o Chantal Hoffman 6 Pod's Lane, . RR #1 . Shanty Bay, Ontario. LOL 2LO
Phone 835-5599 . Fax 835-6305 . Email hoffmans@sympatico.ca
tfc
Madam Clerk,
Township Oro-Medonte
P.O.Box 100
Oro, Ont. LOL 2XO
February 19,2002
RE: DEPUTATION
Please be advised that our representatives Linda Northcott and Sylvia Telford will attend the Counsil Meeting on
Wed. Feb. 27, 2002 at 9:30am to present a deputation in favour of a Playground in the Horseshoe Highlands
Subdivision (at the comer of Pod's Lane and Alpine Way).
zceiU4_
Chantal Hoffman
.
Marilyn Pennycook
'-lei
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Rick & Kelly Dory [rkdory@sympatico.ca]
February 19, 2002 2:50 PM
clerk@township.oro-medonte.on.ca
Council of the Whole-Feb.27th,2002
.
JudgesCh.gif
Madame Clerk: I wish to speak at the above meeting regarding the proposal to
place a playground at the corner of Alpine Way and Pod's Lane. I disagree with this proposal
and would like to put forth my concerns to the Council. Thank you, Rick DORY, 26 Alpine
Way, 835.0223.
...
<t
1
I.
~/. ,
Jq-/
Ministry of Citizenship
Minister
Ministere des Affaires civiques
Ministre
6e etage
400, avenue University
Toronto ON M7A 2R9
Tel. : (416) 325-6200
Telec. : (416) 325-6195
~
-~-
Ontario
6th Floor
400 University Avenue
Toronto ON M7A 2R9
Tel.: (416) 325-6200
Fax: (416) 325-6195
January, 2002
Dear friends,
It is my pleasure to invite you to participate in Ontario's volunteer recognition programs for
the year 2002.
You will find enclosed information and nomination forms for three award programs that provide
for an opportunity to thank our volunteers and recognize them in a significant way.
The programs are:
· The Ontario Volunteer Service Awards which recognize volunteers for continuous service
with a community group
· The Outstanding Achievement Awards for Voluntarism in Ontario which recognize
superlative volunteer work by individuals, groups or businesses
· The Ontario Medal for Young Volunteers which is presented to young volunteers between
the ages of 15 and 24 years in recognition of their outstanding achievements
Volunteers contribute so much to our communities and organizations. Last year in Ontario
volunteers contributed almost 400 million hours giving back to their communities! Your
participation in our official award programs is your chance to give back to the volunteers and
ensure they receive the recognition they deserve. I ask you to carefully consider your volunteers
with these award programs in mind. Thank You.
Sincerely,
(k
Cam Jackson
Minister
@ Ontario
The Ontario
Volunteer SelVice Awards
\7
'"
Purpose
All across Ontario, from North to South,
East to West, people volunteer their time
and give of their talents, energy and
enthusiasm. Ontario's volunteers impact
all sectors including health, recreation,
sport, culture, arts, environment, educa-
tion and heritage. There is no aspect of
life in Ontario that has not been enriched
by the efforts of dedicated citizens who
are volunteers. All Ontarians benefit from
the millions of volunteers who help to
make our communities safe, caring and
prosperous. By submitting a nomination,
individuals and organizations can help
ensure that volunteers in Ontario receive
the recognition they deserve.
Recognizing continuous service
The Ontario Volunteer Service Awards
are a way for the government to rec-
ognize volunteers for their undeniable
contributions. The awards are also a
way to thank volunteers for their con-
tinuous years of commitment and
dedicated service to a group. Youth
volunteers (under the age of 24) are
recognized for two or more years of
continuous service. Adults are recog-
nized for 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30 and
50 years of continuous service.
Other forms of recognition
The government of Ontario offers
other programs that recognize volun-
teers for contributions beyond years
of continuous service. Outstanding
Achievement Awards for Voluntarism
in Ontario are presented to 20 indi-
viduals, groups and businesses that
have made exceptional contributions
to their communities and the
province through voluntary action.
The Ontario Medal for Young
Volunteers recognizes the outstanding
achievements of 10 young volunteers
between the ages of 15 and 24 who
have made a difference to their com-
munities.
Who is eligible?
The Ontario Volunteer Service Awards are
presented to volunteers who contribute
consecutive years of serviCe to a group*
within Ontario, and whose work is char-
acterized by the following:
· Volunteer time given on an ongoing
and active basis to the same group for
which no payment has been received
. Membership alone is not a qualification
for recognition
. Services performed during the normal
The Queen's Golden Jubilee
The year 2002will mark the 50th anniversary of Her Majesty The Queenis accession to
the Throne. A key theme for The Queen's Golden Jubilee is giving thanks for service to
community through voluntary efforts. As a parliamentary democracy that recognizes
The Queen as Canada's official Head of State, the government of Ontario is pleased to
participate in this celebration while continuing to raise awareness about the contribu-
tions that volunteers have made to Ontario communities and society as a whole.
..,
course of professional or business
duties are not eligible for recogni-
tion.
Groups that have been in existence
for a minimum of five years may com-
plete a nomination. Each group may
nominate up to six volunteers.
Nominators must attest to the accura-
cy of the information provided for
each volunteer by signing a
Certification Clause on the nomina-
tion form for this program.
*For the purposes of this program
"group" is defined as: community, not-
for-profit, and non-profit organiza-
tions/associations; co-operatives;
boards; commissions; businesses; gov-
ernment ministries that directly recruit
volunteers; arts/educational/correction-
al institutions and school's;municipali-
ties; long term care facilities; hospitals.
Dryden District Office
479 Govemment Road
P. O. Box 3000
Dryden, On P8N 3B3
Tel: (807) 223-8682
Toll-free: 1-800-525-8785
Fax: (807)223-8502
Hamilton District Office
119 King Street West
14th Floor
Hamilton, ON l8P4Y7
Tel: (905) 521-7244
Fax: (905) 521-7()21
Huntsville District Office
207 Main Street West.
Huntsville, ON P1H 1 Z9
Tel: (705) 789-4448
Fax: (705) 789-9533
Kenora District Office
810 Robertson Street
Kenora, ON P9N 1X8
Tel: (807) 468-2450
Toll-free:.1-800-465-1108
Fax: (807) 468-2788
Kingston District Office
Ontario GOvemment Building
Beechgrove Complex
51 Heakesl.ane
Kingston, ONK7M 9B1
Tel: (613)531-5580
Toll-free: 1-800-293-7543
Fax: (613)531-5585
How are the recipients selected?
The ministry relies on the judgement
of the head of group (Chair, President
etc.) to ensure the information
provided is true and the nominees are
deserving of recognition in keeping
with the requirements of the award.
Nominations are reviewed and
acknowledged by letter.
MIen are the awards presented
Recipients are presented with stylized
trillium pins and personalized certifi-
cates at special ceremonies held
across the province in the spring. Pins
and certificates each correspond to
the length of service being recog-
nized. Recipients receive an invitation
to attend the ceremony with one
guest. Each organization making a
5q0
nomination is also invited to have two
representatives attend the ceremony.
MIen is the deadline?
Completed nomination forms
will be accepted no later than
March 15, 2002.
For more information...
Ontario Honours and Awards
Ministry of Citizenship
400 University Avenue, 2nd floor
Toronto, ON M7A 2R9
Tel: (416) 314-7526
Fax: (416) 314-7743
E-mail: ontariohonoursandawards
@mczcr.gov.on.ca
Or visit our Web site:
www.gov.on.ca/mczcr
Or contact the nearest regional
service office listed below:
Ministry of Citizenship Field Offices
Kitchener District Office
30 Duke Street West
Suite 405
Kitchener, ON N2H 3W5
Tel: (519).578-3600
Toll-free: 1-800-265-2189
Fax: (519) 578-1632
london District Office
659 Exeter Road, 2nd Floor
London,pI'-JN6E1L3
T~I),(519)873-4056
Toll-free: 1-800-265-4730
Fi1x: (519)873-4061
Markdale District Office
181 Toronto Street South
p. O. Box 496
Markdale,ON NOC 1HO
Tel: (519) 986-3219
Toll-free: 1-800..265-5520
Fax: (519) 986-3014
Midhurst District Office
2284 Nursery Road
Midhurst, QNLOL 1 XO
Tel: (705) 739-6696
Fax: (705) 739-6697
North Bay District Office
447.McKeownAvenue
North Bay, ON P1 B 9S9
Tel: (705) 494-4182
Toll-free: 1-800-461-9563
Fax:(705)49~69
Ottawa District Office
530 Tremblay Road, 1st Floor
Ottawa, ON . K1G 6B7
Tel:<(613) 742-3360
Toll-free: 1-800-267-9340
Fax: (613) 742-5300
peterborough District Office
300 Water Street
South Tower,2ndFloor
Peterborough, ON K9J 8M5
Tel: (705) 755-2624
Toll-free:1-800-461-7629
Fax: (705) 755-2631
Sault Ste. Marie District Office
Roberta Bondar Place
70 Foster Drive, Suite 200
Sault Ste. Marie, ON . P6A 6V8
Tel: (705) 945-5885
Toll-free: 1-800461-7284
Fax: (705) 945-5931
Sioux lookout District Office
p. O. Box 267
62 Queen Street
Sioux Lookout, ONP8T 1 A3
Tel: (807)737-1018
Toll-free: 1-800-529-6619
Fax: (807) 737-3379
St Catharines District Office
301 St Paul Street,9th Floor
St Catharines, ON L2R 7R4
Tel: (905) 704-3590
Toll-free: 1-800-263-2441
Fax: (905)704-3955
Sudbury District Office
Ontario Govemment Building
1.99 larch Street, Suite 401
Sudbury, ON .P3E 5P9
Tel: (705) 564-3035 .
Toll-free: 1-800-461-4004
Fax: (705) 564-3043
Thunder Bay District Office
435JamesStreet South
Suite 334
Thunder Bay, ON P7E6E3
Tel: (807) 475-1.683
Toll-free: 1-800-465-6861
Fax: (807) 475-1297
Timmins District Offi(e
Ontario Govemment Complex
Highway 1 01 East
P.O. Box 3085
South Porcupine, ON PON 1 HO
Tel: (705) 235-1550
Toll-free: 1-800-305-4442
Fax: (705) 235-1553
Central Area Office
400 University Avenue
5th Floor
Toronto, ON M7A 2R9
Tel: (416) 31~7270
Fax: (416).~1+6686
Windsor DistJjct. Office
221 Mill Street
Windsor, ON N9C 2R1
Toll-free: 1-800-265-1330
Fax: (519) 973-1414
ISBN 0-7778-9242-1 (Rev.)
D3639 01/02 35M
'-' -
~ Ontario
The Ontario Volunteer Service Awards
NOMINATION FORM
Nominators must certify nominations as outlined on the final page of this form.
Personal information on this form is collected under the authority of the Ministry of Citizenship and Culture Act, R.S.O.1990,
c.M.IS, sA and will be used to determine eligibility and notify recipients of the Ontario Volunteer Service Awards. _ For further
information, please contact the Manager, Ontario Honours and Awards, 400 University Avenue, 2nd Floor, Toronto, ON M7 A 2R9,
(416) 314-7523,
.
(Please type or print clearly and complete in full)
NOMINATING GROUP or ORGANIZATION
Name
Address
'-'-
Suite/Unit '*
Postal Code
STREET OR P. O. BOX NUMBER
City/Town
County
Telephone: ( )
Year group or organization formed
Please indicate below the total number of volunteers in group or organization:
c::::J Senior Citizens (ages 65 years and over) c::::J Adults c::::J Youth (24 & under)
E-mail
Fax: (
)
HEAD OF GROUP OR ORGANIZATION (CHAIR, PRESIDENT, ETc.)
o Mr. 0 Mrs. 0 Ms. First Name(s)
Title
Address
Last Name
City/Town
Telephone: ( )
Suite/Unit '*
Postal Code
STREET OR P. O. BOX NUMBER
E-mail:
CONTACT
o Mr. 0 Mrs. 0 Ms. First Name
Title
Telephone: ( )
Last Name(s)
E-mail
Fax: (
)
.,
Brief description of objectives and activities of your group or organization
VOLUNTEERS BEING NOMINATED
,5q-S
o Mr. 0 Mrs. 0 Ms, Details of volunteer service with nominating group or
First Name(s) organization, including items of special interest
Last Name
Residential Address
STREET OR P. O. BOX NUMBER
Apt./Unit:#:
City/Town Postal Code
Telephone ( ) CEREMONY LOCATION
o Invite recipient to ceremony closest to their residential address
AGE CATEGORY o Invite recipient to ceremony closest to the organization's address
o Senior Citizen o Adult o Youth (give age _) Occupation
Number of consecutive years as a volunteer in the organization _ Preferred language of communication
o Mr. 0 Mrs. 0 Ms. Details of volunteer service with nominating group or
First Name(s) organization, including items of special interest
Last Name
Residential Address
STREET OR P. O. BOX NUMBER
, Apt./Unit:#:
,
City /Town Postal Code
Telephone ( ) CEREMONY LOCATION
o Invite recipient to ceremony closest to their residential address
AGE CATEGORY o Invite recipient to ceremony closest to the organization's address
o Senior Citizen o Adult o Youth (give age _ ) Occupation
Number of consecutive years as a volunteer in the organization _ Preferred langIJage of communication
o Mr. 0 Mrs. 0 Ms. Details of volunteer service with nominating group or ,
First Name(s) organization, including items of special interest
Last Name
Residential Address
STREET OR P. O. BOX NUMBER
Apt./Unit:#:
City /Town Postal Code
Telephone ( ) CEREMONY LOCATION
o Invite recipient to ceremony closest to their residential address
AGE CATEGORY o Invite recipient to ceremony closest to the organization's address
o Senior Citizen o Adult o Youth (give age _ ) Occupation
Number of consecutive years as a volunteer in the organization _ Preferred language of communication
o Mr. 0 Mrs, 0 Ms, Details of volunteer service with nominating group or
First Name(s) organization, including items of special interest
Last Name
Residential Address
STREET OR P. O. BOX NUMBER
Apt./Unit:#:
City/Town Postal Code
Telephone ( ) CEREMONY LOCATION
o Invite recipient to ceremony closest to their residential address
AGE CATEGORY o Invite recipient to ceremony closest to the organization's address
o Senior Citizen o Adult o Youth (give age _) Occupation
Number of consecutive years as a volunteer in the organization _ Preferred language of communication
U......, -\...P
o Mr. 0 Mrs. 0 Ms. ! Details of volunteer service with nominating group or
First Name (s) organization, including items of special interest
Last Name
Residential Address
Apt./Unit#
City/Town Postal Code
Telephone ( ) CEREMONY LOCATION
o Invite recipient to ceremony closest to their residential address
AGE CATEGORY o Invite recipient to ceremony closest to the organization's address
o Senior Citizen o Adult o Youth (give age _ ) Occupation
Number of consecutive years as a volunteer in the organization _ Preferred language of communication
o Mr. o Mrs. 0 Ms, Details of volunteer service with nominating group or
First Name(s) organization, including items of special interest
Last Name
Residential Address
Apt./Unit#
City/Town Postal Code
Telephone ( ) CEREMONY LOCATION
o Invite recipient to ceremony closest to their residential address
AGE CATEGORY o Invite recipient to ceremony closest to the organization's address
o Senior Citizen o Adult o Youth (give age _ ) Occupation
Number of consecutive years as a volunteer in the organization _ Preferred language of communication
CERTIFICATION CLAUSE
Information for nominators
Before signing the certification below, please ensure that you have read the accompanying information sheet entitled the 2001 Ontario
Volunteer Service Awards and are satisfied the nominations you have made fit within the parameters of the award program as described
and all of the nominees are, in your opinion, deserving of the award.
Nomination Certification
I hereby certify that I have been a member in good standing in the above-named group or organization and to the best of my knowledge
I certify that all of the information provided on this form is true and assert it is my belief that each of the nominees listed above is deserv-
ing of an Ontario Volunteer Service Award since he/she meets the requirements of the award.
Name (print)
Title
Signature
Date
Completed forms must be received by March 15, 2002. Please submit signed, original forms only.
SEND TO:
Ontario Honours and Awards
Ministry of Citizenship
400 University Avenue, 2nd Floor, Toronto, ON M7 A 2R9
Tel: (416) 314-7526 Fax: (416) 314-7743
61-544 (12/00)
~Ontario
/'
6q-1
The Outstanding Achievement Awards
for Voluntarism in Ontario
#<
Purpose
The personal commitment made by vol-
unteers all across Ontario is significant.
Whether it is by volunteering their time,
efforts, knowledge or resources, people
across Ontario are making valuable con-
tributions to the quality of life in their
communities and in our province. Among
the thousands of volunteers in Ontario,
there are those who make exceptional
contributions. The Outstanding Achieve-
ment Awards for Voluntarism in 'Ontario
recognize extraordinary leadership, inno-
vation and creativity. Each year, 20
awards are given to a select group of
individuals, organizations and businesses
that have made superlative contributions
to their communities and the province
through voluntary action.
The contributions of volunteers affect
many fields of endeavour. There is no
aspect of life in Ontario that has not been
enriched by the efforts of dedicated citi-
zens who are volunteers. The Outstand-
ing Achievement Awards for Voluntarism
in Ontario recognizes and highlights the
contributions of 20 recipients and serves
to inspire others by the positive examples
they provide.
Other forms of recognition
The government of Ontario also offers
the Volunteer Service Awards to recognize
volunteers for their years of continuous
service to a group. Youth volunteers
(under the age of 24) are recognized for
two or more years of continuous service.
Adults are recognized for 5, 10, 15, 20,
25, 30 and 50 years of continuous service.
The Ontario Medal for Young Volunteers
recognizes the outstanding achievements
of 10 young volunteers between the ages
of 15 and 24 ~ho have made a differ-
ence to their communities.
Who is eligible
The Outstanding Achievement Awards for
Voluntarism in Ontario are presented to
individuals, groups and businesses that
have made lasting and meaningful contri-
The Queen's GoldenJubilee
The year 2002 will mark the. 50th anniversary of Her Majesty The Queen's accession to
the Throne, A key theme for The Queen's Golden Jubilee is giving thanks for service to
community through voluntary efforts. As a parliamentary democracy that recognizes
The Queen as Canada's official Head of State, the government of Ontario is pleased to
participate in this celebration while continuing to raise awareness about thecontribu-
tions that volunteers have made to Ontario communities and society as <a whole.
butions. or provided significant sup-
port to the volunteer activities of:
community and not-for-profit organi-
zations or associations; co-operatives,
boards; commissions; businesses; gov-
ernment ministries that directly recruit
volunteers; art/educational/correction-
al institutions and schools; municipali-
ties; long-term care facilities and
hospitals.
How are the recipients
selected?
A jury of seven to nine individuals
review the nominations and select 20
recipients. The jury is made up of
individuals from across Ontario and
represent a variety of disciplines.
Dryden District Office
479 Govemment Road
P. O. Box 3000
Dryden, On P8N 3B3
Tel: (807) 223-8682
Toll-free: 1-800-525-8785
Fax: (807) 223-8502
Hamilton District Office
119 King Street west
14th Floor
Hamilton, ON L8P 4Y7
Tel: (905) 521-7244
Fax: (905) 521-7621
Huntsville District Office
207 Main Street West
Huntsville, ON P1 H 1 Z9
Tel: (705) 789-4448
Fax: (705) 789-9533
Kenora District Office
81 0 Robertson Street
Kenora, ON P9N 1 X8
Tel: (807) 468-2450
Toll-free: 1-800-465-1108
Fax: (807) 468-2788
Kingston District Office
Ontario Govemment Building
Beechgrove Complex
51 Heakes Lane
Kingston, ON K7M 9B1
Tel: (613) 531-5580
Toll-free: 1-800-293-7543
Fax: (613) 531-5585
'When are the awards
presented?
The Outstanding Achievement Awards
for Voluntarism in Ontario will be pre-
sented with the Volunteer Service
Awards at ceremonies held across the
province beginning in the spring.
Invitations are extended to each
recipient and two representatives
from the nominating group. Each
recipient may be accompanied at
the ceremony by a select number
of guests.
'When is the deadline
for nominations
Completed nomination forms for the
Outstanding Achievement Awards for
~q~-
'--..'
Voluntarism in Ontario will be
accepted no later than
March 15, 2002.
For more information...
Ontario Honours and Awards
Ministry of Citizenship
400 University Avenue, 2nd Floor
Toronto, ON
M7A 2R9
Tel: (416) 314-7526
Fax: (416) 314-7743
E-mail:
ontariohonoursandawards
@mczcr.gov.on.ca
or Visit our Web site:
www.gov.on.ca/mczcr
or Contact the nearest regional
service office listed below:
Ministry of Citizenship Field Offices
Kitchener District Office
30 Duke Street West
Suite 405
Kitchener, ON N2H 3W5
Tel: (519) 578-3600
Toll-free: 1-800-265-2189
Fax: (519) 578-1632
London District Office
659 Exeter Road, 2nd Floor
London, ON N6E 1 L3
Tel: (519) 873-4056
Toll-free: 1-800-265-4730
Fax: (519) 873-4061
Markdale District Office
181 Toronto Street South
P. O. Box 496
Markdale, ON NOC 1 HO
Tel: (519) 986-3219
Toll-free: 1-800-265-5520
Fax: (519) 986-3014
Midhurst District Office
2284 Nursery Road
Midhurst, ON LOL 1 XO
Tel: (705) 739-6696
Fax: (705) 739-6697
North Bay District Office
447 McKeown Avenue
North Bay, ON P1 B 9S9
Tel: (705) 494-4182
Toll-free: 1-800-461-9563
Fax: (705) 494-4069
Ottawa District Office
530 Tremblay Road, 1 st Floor
Ottawa, ON K1 G 6B7
Tel: (613) 742-3360
Toll-free: 1-800-267-9340
Fax: (613) 742-5300
Peterborough District Office
300 Water Street
South Tower, 2nd Floor
Peterborough, ON K9J 8M5
Tel: (705) 755-2624
Toll-free: 1-800-461-7629
Fax: (705) 755-2631
Sault Ste. Marie District Office
Roberta Bondar Place
70 Foster Drive, Suite 200
Sault Ste. Marie, ON P6A 6V8
Tel: (705) 945-5885
Toll-free: 1-800-461-7284
Fax: (705) 945-5931
Sioux Lookout District Office
P. O. Box 267
62 Queen Street
Sioux Lookout, ONP8T 1 A3
Tel: (807) 737-1018
Toll-free: 1-800-529-6619
Fax: (807) 737-3379
St, Catharines District Office
301 St Paul Street,9th Floor
S1. Catha rines, ON L2R 7R4
Tel: (905) 704-3590
Toll-free: 1-800-263-2441
Fax: (905) 704-3955
Sudbury District Office
Ontario Govemment Building
199 Larch Street, Suite 401
Sudbury, ON P3E 5P9
Tel: (705) 564-3035
Toll-free: 1-800-461-4004
Fax: (705) 564-3043
Thunder Bay District Office
435 James Street South
Suite 334
Thunqer Bay, ON P7E 6E3
Tel: (807) 475-1683
Toll-free: 1-800-465-6861
Fax: (807) 475-1297
limmins District Office
Ontario Govemment Complex
Highway 101 East
P. O. Box 3085
South Porcupine, ON PON 1 HO
Tel: (705) 235-1550
Toll-free: 1-800-305-4442
Fax: (705) 235-1553
Central Area Office
400 University Avenue
5th Floor
Toronto, ON M7 A 2R9
Tel: (416) 314-7270
Fax: (416) 314-6686
Windsor District Office
221 Mill Street
Windsor, ON N9C 2R1
Toll-free: 1-800-265-1330
Fax: (519) 973-1414
ISBN 0-7778-9241-3 (Rev.)
D3638 01/02 35M
L"O -
::J '
~ Ontario
The Outstanding Achieventent Awards for
Voluntarism in Ontario
NOMINATION FORM
Personal information on this form is collected under the authority of the Ministry of Citizenship and Culture Act, R.S.O,1990,
c.M.18, sA and will be used to determine eligibility and notify recipients of the Outstanding Achievement Award for Voluntarism
in Ontario. For further information, please contact the Manager, Ontario Honours and Awards, 400 University Avenue, 2nd Floor,
Toronto, ON M7A 2R9, (416) 314-7523
In addition to completing the form found on the reverse side of this page, on separate sheets
attach a detailed description of the achievement (500 - 1,000 words) in which you:
(a) Describe the achievement in detail, that is, what made this an outstanding achievement for your
nominee, indicating background factors and/or circumstances, the way in which it was carried
out, and the obstacles overcome;
(b) Indicate what encouragement and training of volunteers may have taken place;
(c) Provide examples of ongoing leadership and dedication;
(d) Indicate what resources were generated (human and/or financial);
(e) Indicate what has been learned from this achievement that might be applied elsewhere in the
volunteer sector;
(f) Provide written testimonials from two persons who are familiar with the value and impact of the
achievement; and also indicate:
(g) How long you have known the nominee;
(h) When the achievement was initiated and completed.
Additional Material (optional)
Provide any additional material to support this nomination
(Le" publications, photographs, media stories, etc.).
Completed forms must be received by March IS, 2002.
Please submit signed, original forms only.
",
Send completed forms to:
Ontario Honours and Awards
Ministry of Citizenship
400 University Avenue, 2nd Floor
Toronto, ON M7 A 2R9
Tel: (416) 314-7526
Fax: (416) 314-7743
61-543 (01/02)
,-;
The Outstanding Achievement Awards
for Voluntarism in Ontario
NOMINATION FORM
(Please type or print clearly and complete in full)
My nomination is for:
o an individual o . group o a business
If you are nominating a group or business, please give the name of the chief administrative or executive officer below:
INDIVIDUAL BEING NOMINATED:
o Mr. o Mrs. OMs.
First Name last Name
Business Address Suite/Unit #
STREET OR P. O. BOX NUMBER
City IT own Postal Code
County E-mail
Telephone: ( . ) Fax: ( )
GROUP OR BUSINESS BEING NOMINATED:
Name of group or business
Name of Chief Administrator/Executive Officer
Business Address Suite/Unit #
STREET OR P. O. BOX NUMBER
City IT own Postal C<>de
County E-mail
Telephone: ( ) Fax: ( )
NOMINATION SUBMITTED BY:
Name
Organization/Company Name
Business Address Suite/Unit #
STREET OR P. O. BOX NUMBER
City IT own Postal Code
County E-mail
Telephone: ( ) Fax: ( )
Signature Date
The Orztal1o Aledal
u
Purpose
The Ontario Medal for Young
Volunteers was created to recognize the
outstanding achievements of young
volunteers across the province of
Ontario. The personal commitment of
time and effort made by young
volunteers is a valuable contribution to
the quality of life in their communities
and in our province. The leaders of
tomorrow are among these many youth
volunteers.
By bestowing special distinction upon
these admirable youth, the Ontario
Medal for Young Volunteers emphasizes
the importance of volunteering in
building strong communities across our
province.
Other forms of recognition
The government of Ontario also offers
the Volunteer Service Awards to
recognize volunteers for their years of
continuous service to a group. Youth
volunteers (under the age of 24) are
.~q- -//
'-'" . ,
~ Ontario
rs
recognized for two or more years of
continuous service. Adults are
recognized for 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30
and 50 years of continuous service.
The Outstanding Achievement Awards
for Voluntarism in Ontario recognize
extraordinary leadership, innovation'
and creativity. Each year, 20 awards are
given to a select group of individuals,
organizations and businesses that have
made superlative contributions to their
communities and the province through
voluntary action.
Who is eligible?
The Ontario Medal for Young
Volunteers is presented to 10 young
people who: '\
· Are between the ages of 15 and 24
years during the year 2001
· Reside in Ontario
· Contribute significant time and
. service without pay to a charity, not-
for-profit organizations or an
individual
The Queen's Golden Jubilee
The year 2002 will mark the 50th anniversary of Her Majesty The Queen's accession
to the Throne. A key theme for The Queen's Golden Jubilee is giving thanks for
service to community through voluntary efforts. As a parliamentary democracy
that recognizes The Queen as Canada's official Head of State, the government of
Ontario is pleased to participate in this celebration while continuing to raise
awareness about the contributions that volunteers have made to Ontario
communities and society as a whole.
. Have made a sustained and
innovative contribution in the
community, demonstrating
leadership, initiative, perseverance,
originality, as well as the promise of
long-term improvement or greater
public awareness of the community
activity
. Have proven to be a role model
attracting others to volunteering
. Have inspired and helped peers and
community as a whole, to better
understand and appreciate the
importance of volunteering.
How are the recipients selected?
The 10 award recipients are selected by
an independent Advisory Council.
When are the awards presented?
Recipients are presented with a medal
by the Lieutenant Governor at a
ceremony held in the Provincial
Legislature each spring.
When is the deadline for
nominations?
Completed nomination forms for the
Ontario Medal for Young Volunteers
will be accepted no later than
March 15, 2002. Posthumous and self-
nominations will not be accepted.
Please include the following in
your submission:
o Describe the volunteer achievement
in detail
o Describe what made this an
outstanding achievement
o Indicate how long you have known
the nominee
o Indicate when the achievement was
initiated and completed.
Je/ -" (/
Additional materials:
o Written testimonials from two
additional persons who can attest
to the value and impact of the
achievement
o Additional information you feel will
support this nomination (e.g.
additional testimonial letters,
publications, media stories, etc.)
Special tips:
o Nominees will be judged on the
quality of their achievement
o Academic performance is not taken
into consideration
o Applicants should include sufficient
information to give judges a good
idea of who the nominee is and the
impact of his/her accomplishments.
For more information...
Ontario Honours and Awards
Ministry of Citizenship
400 University Avenue, 2nd floor
Toronto, ON M7A 2R9
Tel.: (416) 314-7526
Fax: (416) 314-7743
E-mail:
ontariohonoursandawards@mczcr.gov.on.ca
or visit our Web site at:
www.gov.on.ca/mczcr
Deadline: MARCH 15, 2002
!)C; - /.3
~ Ontario
NOMINATION FORM
Personal information on this form is collected under the authority of the Ministry of Citizenship and Culture Act,
R.5.0. 1990, eM. 18, s.4 and will be used to determine the eligibility and notify recipients of the Ontario Medal
for Young Volunteers. For further information, please contact the Manager, Ontario Honours and Awards,
400 University Ave, 2nd floor, Toronto, ON M7A 2R9, (416) 314-7523.
Name of Nominee
Title
First Name
Last Name
Address
City
Province
Postal Code
Telephone No. (9:00am - 5:00pm)
Fax No.
E-mail
Date of Birth (d/m/y)
Youth's Achievement (10 word maximum)
Name of Nominator
Title
First Name
Last Name
Position
Organization/Business Name
Address
City
Province
Postal Code
Telephone No. (9:00am - 5:00pm)
Fax No.
E-mail
Signature of Nominator
Date
@)
LAKE SIMCOE REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
MEETING NO. BOO-01-02
Friday, January 25th, 2002 - 9:00 a.m.
EastGwillimbury Municipal Offices
Holland Landing Room
19000 Leslie Street
Sharon, ON
-51 .1
!J f
'-'(IJ'
~
MINUTES
'"
MEMBERS:
R. Bridge - Chair
Councillor L. Corrigan
J.O. Dales
Alderman A. Eadie
Councillor V. Hackson
Councillor M. Jordan
Councillor G. Lamb
Councillor H. Lodwick
Councillor P. Marshall
Deputy Mayor S. Para
Councillor S. Pliakes
Councillor N. Snutch
Councillor W. Teel
Deputy Mayor H. Vander Kooij
Deputy Mayor J. West
STAFF:
D. G. Wood, C.A.O.lSecretary-Treasurer
S. Hanson, Director, Corporate Services
A. Leach, Director, Conservation Land
Management
R. Vos, Director, Watershed Management
M. Walters, Manager, Environmental
Services
G. Casey, Recording Secretary
REGRETS:
Mayor J. Holec
G.R. Richardson
Chair Bridge opened the meeting by welcoming Councillor Neal Snutch, Township of Ramara, to
his first meeting with the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority's Board of Directors. This was
followed by a round table introduction of all Board Members and LSRCA Staff.
1.. ~isclosure of Pecuniary Interest & the General Nature Thereof
There were no declarations of conflict of interest at this meeting.
2. Minutes
Board of Directors
Minutes of the Board of Directors Meeting No. 800-12-01, held on December 14th, 2001.
Moved by
Seconded by:
Paul Marshall
Gary Lamb
BOD-02-01
RESOLVED THAT the Minutes of the Board of
Directors Meeting No. BOO-12-01, held on
December 14th, 2001, be adopted.
8
Board of Directors' Meeting 800-01-02
Minutes
56~d--
January 251h, 2002
...
(b) Administrative Committee
The CAG advised that the Agenda and the Minutes ofthe Administrative Committee meeting
held January 24th, 2002, have been tabled and will be dealt with under Agenda Item 11 (a)
New Business "In Camera".
3. Adoption of Agenda
The Chair reviewed the tabled items.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Larry Corrigan
Margaret Jordan
BOD-02-02
RESOLVED THAT the Agenda of the Board of
Directors Meeting No. BOD-02-01 be adopted as
amended to include the "Tabled Items and Other
Business" Agenda.
4. Announcements
Chair Bridge announced that Mayor Tom Taylor, Town of Newmarket has been appointed
as the representative of York Region (Town of Newmarket) on the LSRCA's Board of
Directors replacing Mr. George Richardson who has recently submitted his resignation.
Chair Bridge further announced that Mayor Ron Stevens, City of Orillia, has been appointed
to sit on the LSRCA's Board of Directors in an ex-officio capacity.
The CAO reported that she is presently in -the process of scheduling a meeting with the CAO
of Barrie to discuss jurisdictional expansion relating to the northern portion of Barrie.
Councillor Harold Lodwick advised that after many years of discussions regarding the
protection of Wilfred Bog (Pefferlaw Peat), a site plan agreement has been approved.
Councillor Margaret Jordan, Town of Georgina, informed the Board that the Town of
Georgina recently received $31 million in funding under the Super Build and Industry
Canada programs, which will be used for a water distribution and sewage collection system
for Georgina residents (Willow Beach). It is expected that this plan will reduce the amount
of phosphorus presently entering Lake Simcoe,
5. Deputations
No Deputations were presented at this meeting.
9
Board of Directors' Meeting 800-01-02
Minutes
January 25lh,
20025b ...3
6. Hearinqs Under Section 28 of the Conservation Authorities Act
No Hearings were presented at this meeting.
7. Fill. Construction & Alteration to Waterways Applications
Moved by:
Seconded by:
BOD-02-03
8. Correspondence
Wayne Teel
Virginia Hackson
RESOLVED THAT applications under Section 28 of
the Conservation Authorities Act and Ontario
Regulation 153/90, as amended by Ontario
Regulations 534/91 and 623/94, be received and
approved.
With great regret the Board of Directors accepted the resignation of Mr. George Richardson.
The Board recommended that Mr. George Richardson remain on the Board of Directors as
a Lifetime Honourary Member in recognition of his many years of commitment and
dedication to conservation. The following motion was accepted unanimously,
Moved by:
Seconded by:
BOD-02-04
John G. West
Susan Para
RESOLVED THAT Mr. George Richardson be
recognized by the LSRCA by making him a lifetime
Honourary Member.
The CAO spoke to the correspondence listed in the Agenda and in the Tabled Items and
Other Business Agenda. The CAO thanked the municipalities who have provided letters of
support for the Paddling Around Lakes Simoce (PALS) program and for their letters of
support for the Lake Simcoe Environmental Management Strategy - Phase III MOU.
The CAO read a letter from The Honourable David Anderson, P.C., M.P., Minister of the
Environment, which expresses support for the "Healthy Great Lakes" proposal. This letter
was tabled at the meeting. .
The CAO referred to the letter from the City of Kawartha Lakes regarding. the 2002
Preliminary Budget and their approval of the General Levy, The CAO advi$ed that a
presentation to their Council regarding LSEMS and the 2002 Preliminary Budget will be
made on January 29th, 2002,
10
Board of Directors' Meeting 800-01-02
Minutes
January 251h, 2002
"
Moved by :
Seconded by:
800-02-05
.."./
,/{b>~V
'-" ,
Harold Lodwick
Wayne Teel
RESOLVED THAT the correspondence listed in the
January 25th, 2002, agenda be received for
information.
9. Monthly Communications Update
The Director of Corporate Services spoke to the Monthly Communications Update.
The Director of Corporate Services advised that the LSRCA has a new website provider and,
as with all turnovers, some glitches and problems were experienced which have since been
corrected. The LSRCA is now in the process of updating and refreshing the website.
The CAO announced that the Manager of Environmental Services submitted a proposal to
the "Managing the Environment" program for funding for an LSEMS based website. This
proposal was successful and the Authority will be receiving $50,000 through MOE/MNR to
develop the website which will be done by the Manager of Environmental Services and the
Manager of Fundraising and Community Relations.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
800-02-06
, 10. New 8usiness
Harold Lodwick
Wayne T eel
RESOLVED THAT the Monthly Communications
update, dated December 1st to 31st, 2001, be
received for information.
a) 2001 Chair's Report of Activities
The Chair presented Chair's Report No. 01-02-800 which outlines the Chair's Activities for
the year 2001. The Chair advised that he is very pleased with the accomplishments of the
Authority and the direction it is headed.
Moved by: '
Seconded by:
800-02-07,
Larry Corrigan
Paul Marshall
RESOLVED THAT Chair's Report No. 01-02-800
on the Chair's 2001 Activities be received for
information.
11
Board of Directors' Meeting 80D-01-02
Minutes
January 251h, 2002
,,/
"-)
b) Preliminary Budqet - Municipal Responses
The Director of Corporate Services spoke to Staff Report No. 02-02-BOO informing the
Board of Directors that both she and the CAO have met with each member municipality to
present the 2002 Preliminary Budget. The LSRCA made joint presentations with partnering
Authorities to York and Durham Regions.
The Director of Corporate Services reviewed Schedule "A" which was included with the Staff
Report and provided an update by municipality. To date the 2002 Preliminary Budget has
been well received, however the capital component for Land Management is not being
supported which is a concern.
The CAO advised that the Authority presently has 24 properties which need to be
maintained and that without funding this will become a problem. Staff will be reviewing
options and will bring a report to the Board at a future date on how to proceed.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
BOD-02-08
Wayne Teel
Susan Para
RESOLVED THAT Staff Report No. 02-02-800 on
the 2002 Preliminary Budget - Municipal
Response, be received for information and the
recommendation contained therein be approved.
c) Conservation Tracker - Consultant Selection - Installation
The Director of Corporate Services presented Staff Report No. 03-02-BOD which provides
information on the proposal for an information management system for the Authority. It is
expected that the system will be in place by the end of March 2002, and will require some
minimal upgrades to the current computer systems for some staff.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
800-02-09
Margaret Jordan
tarry Corrigan
RESOLVED THAT Staff Report No. 03-02-800 on
the Consultant Selection for the installation of the
Conservation Tracker Information Management
Software be approved; and
FURTHER THAT appropriate staff be authorized to
carryout the recommendations of the staff report.
12
Board of Directors' Meeting 800-01-02
Minutes
January 25"1, 2002
"
d) LSEMS MOU . Phase III
<.d/ /
~~~h ,e tp
. -~".......""*
-
The CAG spoke to Staff Report No. 04-02-BOO giving an overview of the lSEMS initiative.
and the Authority's involvement. The Authority has been the lead agency for the LSEMS
initiative since 1990 and continues in that capacity. The main focus of LSEMS is to reduce
the phosphorous load to lake Simcoe. The negotiating guidelines previously approved by
the Board of Directors were reviewed. The CAG asked forthe Board's approval to have the
Chair sign the MOU under the proviso that the Chair and the CAO meet with the Province
to discuss funding for LSEMS administration/communication.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
800-02-10
Margaret Jordan
Harold Lodwick
Whereas the Lake Simcoe Environmental
Management Strategy (LSEMS) Program has been
in existence for 10 years to improve and protect
the health of the Lake Simcoe watershed; and
Whereas it is essential to continue with Phase III
of the LSEMS Program to ensure continued
improvement to the Lake Simcoe. watershed
through partnerships;
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Lake
Simcoe Region Conservation Authority supports
the LSEMS Phase III Memorandum of
Understanding to work in partnership with the
Province of Ontario, partner municipalities and the
community to achieve the LSEMS goal of
improving and protecting the health of the Lake
Simcoe watershed ecosystem.
(e) Conservation Authorities Moraine Coalition
2001 Accomplishments and 2002 Workplan
The CAO presented Staff Report No. 05-02-BOO providing a brief overview of the 2001
accomplishments and the 2002 Workplan and Budget for the Conservation Authorities
Moraine Coalition.
The Board inquired about Smart Growth and the status of that initiative. The Director of
Watershed Management advised the Board that he attended a Smart Growth Management
Council in November and there has been no further information on the outcome of that
session. The CAO advised that when more information on Smart Growth is received a report
will be brought to the Board.
13
Board of Directors' Meeting BOO-01-02
Minutes
January 25th, 2002
Moved by:
Seconded by:
800-02-11
~I -J
Jo--r
Susan Para
Steve Pliakes
RESOLVED That Staff Report No. 05-02-BOD on
the accomplishments of the Conservation
Authorities Moraine Coalition and the Coalition's
2002 Workplan be received for information.
(f) Integrated Stormwater Management Model
At the November 2001 80ard of Directors' meeting, a request was made to have a
presentation on the Integrated Stormwater Management Model. In response to that request,
the Manager of Environmental Services presented Staff Report No. 06-02-BOO and
. delivered a presentation to the Board on this initiative.
The Board commended the Manager of Environmental Services on the presentation and
supported the Integrated Stormwater Management Model. The Board requested that a
follow- up report on the workplan and budget for this project be presented to the Board for
approval.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
800-02-12
Steve Pliakes
Gary Lamb
RESOLVED That Staff Report No. 06-02-BOO be
received and approved in principle; and
FURTHER THAT staff be directed to proceed with
the development of a detailed project workplan
. and budget for further approval.
(g) Tree Seedling Acquisition - 2002
. The Director of Watershed Management spoke to Staff Report No. 07-02-800 which
provides information on changes to the 2002 Tree Seedling Acquisition.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
800-02-13
Virginia Hackson
Wayne Teel
RESOLVED THAT Staff Report No. 07-02-BOO be
received; and
FURTHER THAT the Board of Directors' approve
the purchase of seedlings in the amount of
$13,136 from Somerville Nurseries to compensate
for the shortfall in stock available from the original
supplier.
14
January 25th, 2002
Board of Directors' Meeting 800-01-02
Minutes
"
56-g/
At the request of Chair Bridge the Board moved to Agenda Item 11 "Other Business" to deal
with the minutes of the Administrative Committee "In Camera"". This request was made as
two Board Members, who also serve on the Administrative Committee, had alternate
commitments and needed to leave the Board meeting early.
The Board requested that, in future, such matters be dealt with at the beginning of the meeting.
11. Other Business
Moved by:
Seconded by:
BOO-02-14
Moved by:
Seconded by:
800-02-15
Larry Corrigan
Harold Lodwick
RESOLVED THAT the Board of Directors move "In
Camera" to deal with confidential matters under
New Business.
Susan Para
Margaret Jordan
RESOLVED THAT the Board of Directors rise from
"In Camera" and report their progress.
,(a) Administrative Committee Meeting Agenda & Minutes (tabled at meeting)
Moved by:
Seconded by:
BOO-02-16
Susan Para
Margaret Jordan
RESOLVED THAT the minutes of the
Administrative Committee Meeting No. AC-01-02,
held on January 24th, 2002, be adopted.
10. New Business (Cont'd)
(h) 2001 Year End TechnIcal Services Statistics
The Director of Watershed Management spoke to Staff Report No. 08-02-BOO regarding the
level of plan review activity for the year 2001.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
BOD-02-17
Paul Marshall
Neal Snutch
RESOLVED THAT Staff Report No. 08-02-800
regarding the 2001 Year End Technical Services
Statistics be received for information.
15
Board of Directors' Meeting 800-01-02
Minutes
January 251h, 2002
(i) Access AQreements
5'6 - C;
The Director of Watershed Management spoke to Staff Report No. 09-02-800 which
provides information on the need for an Access Agreement to ensure access to monitoring
sites for the protection of the LSRCA and the landowner.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
Steve Pliakes
Gary Lamb
BOD-02-18
RESOLVED THAT Staff Report No. 09-02-80D be
received for information; and
FURTHER THAT staff be authorized to use the
approved Access Agreement as required.
Adiourn
Chair Bridge, on behalf of the Board of Directors, extended best wishes to Deputy Mayor John West
for a speedy recovery from his upcoming surgery.
Moved by Harry Vander Kooij
The meeting adjourned at 11 :40 a.m.
D. Gayle 00
Chief Administrative Officer/
Secretary Treasurer
./
(./
16
905 775 0153
02/20/2Q02 15:07 FAX 905 775 0153
. -----.-.-.--"
BRADFORD WESTGWILLIMBlmy
C4J 0011006
/" J
6c-!
Town of Bradford West Gwillimbury
P.O. Box 160, Bradford, Ontario L3Z 2A8
Administration Centre: 3541 Line tl ()t Highway 400 · Tel: 905-775-5360 · Fax: 905-775-0153
February 20, 2002
FAXED & MAILED (6 pages 705-487-0133)
Mayor Ian Beard
and .Members of Council
Township of Oro-Medonte
P.O. Box 100
Oro, Ontario
LOL 2XO
Dear Mayor Beard and Members of Council:
Re: County of Simcoe
Weighted Vote vs. Reduction in County Council Composition
Please find enclosed the following documentation for your consideration:
a) Council Resolution 14-025 passed on February 19, 2002
b) Notice of Motion given at the January 29,2002 County Council meeting
c) February 14, 2002 County of Simcoe Performance Management & Strategic Planning
Committee Report 02-013
Council has directed that I correspond to all municipalities to provide the above
documentation as the February 14,2002 Report 02-013 is contrary to the Notice of Motion.
Said County Report continues to propose that there be a dual purpose By-law to deal with
implementing a revised weighted vote for the existing 32 members, combined with the
controversial issue of reducing the County Council composition by 50%.
It is Council's position that had the County followed the legislative requirements and enacted
a Weighted Vot.e By-law anytime after December 1996, it clearly would have been a By-law
with one sole purpose; being a weighted vote for the 32 member council. There was not
and is not any reason why this one issue cannot proceed by way Qf a separate and distinct
By-law, which sole purpose is to establish a weighted vote formula for the 32 members.
Further, there is no reason to believe that there wiIJ be any difficulty in achieving the required
triple majority consent on this single purpose By-law.
----_.._~
~- ;r/
Februal)' 20, 2002
Re: County of Simcoe
Weighted Vote vs. Reduction in County Council Composition
Page 2
Council fails to understand why the County continues to propose combining this non-
controversial issue with the controversial By-law that proposes to reduce the County Council
composition, particularly when the County has acknowJedged the very real potential that the
controversial By-law may never be enacted due to failure to obtain the required triple
majority consent.
In closing, we would ask that you consider whether it is in the best interests of the residents
of the County or its member municipalities for the County to continue to pursue a proposal
which the County has reason to believe will fail. The need to bring forward a weighted vote
formula for the 32 members is a direct resuJt of an error made by the County. It is the
Town's position that this error can successfully be corrected if the County would simply bring
forward one By-law that deals solely with a weighted formula for the 32 members. Until
such time as the County is successful in enacting a By-law to reduce the council composition,
there remains the need to ensure proper representation based on current electorate
information, thus the need for one By-law, which sole purpose is to establish a weighted vote
formula for the 32 member council.
Thanking you in advance for your attention to these issues prior to the February 28th County
Council meeting_
Yours truly,
6 \)~:s4"'11<'''' b'~:5:>
Juanita Dempster-Evans, AMCT, CMM
Clerk-Administrator
JDE/rt
attach.
02/20/2002 15:07 FAX 905 775 0153
_.-1..-- _
B~ADFORD WESTGWILLIMBURY
I4J 003/006
TOWN OF BRADFORD WEST GWILLlMBURY
RESOLUTION
L(.?
\,.,../ ........ -
Date: February 19, 2002
Resolution No.: 14-025
Moved by: B. Bonany (original signed)
Seconded by: M. Toombs (original signed)
"Re: January 29, 2002 Notice of Motion - County Council - Weighted Vote By-law
Be it resolved that the Council for the Town of Bradford West Gwillimbury fully endorses
the Notice of Motion that Deputy Mayor Roughley gave at the January 29, 2002 County
Council meeting.
That in accordance with arguments made by the County at the January 2002 Court
proceedings, we support the County position that there must be a consistent democratic
approach, and failure to enact a Weighted Vote By-law "would be an eroding of the
weighted votes assigned to those municipalities of the County that were growing in
population faster than others",
That in order to ensure the County asserted goals are fulfilled, it is necessary for the
Weighted Vote By-law to be separate and distinct from the controversial issue of
reducing the composition of County Council. That it is inappropriate to combine both
issues in one By-law as the written decision of Judge Weekes acknowledges that the
County asserted that there is no assurance the County would ever be able to secure the
required triple majority consent.
. That in the event both issues are combined in one By-law, and in the event the County
cannot secure the triple majority consent, there will remain the outstanding issue that
there are 32 members whose weighted vote is based on 1994 electorate information. A
continuation of the weighted vote based on the 1994 electorate information would be
contrary to the assertion made by the County in the Court proceedings, namely that it
advocates a democratic approach which ensures representation by population for its 32
members."
Carried (X) Mayor Frank Jonkman (original signed)
--
_.-.-
/'
L/ /
o c,y;
NOTICE OF MOTION
WHEREAS a recent Court decision has determined that all recorded votes are to be
weighted on the basis of the numbers assigned to members by virtue of Section 7(2)
of the County of Simcoe Act as of December 18, 1996;
AND WHEREAS Coul1ty Council is desirous to increase the weighted vote for its
existing 32 members, said increase to be carried out in compliance with the
requirements of the Municipal Act;
AND WH EREAS the County must fulfill a Legislative requirement to hold one public
meeting as it relates to increasing the weighted vote for the existing 32 members, or
establishing a formula to increase the weighted vote for the existing 32 members;
AND WHEREAS the weighted vote for the current and existing 32 members is
entirely separate and distinct from any By-Law related to reducing the Council
composition;
AND WHEREAS th.e weighted vote for the. 32 members is proceeding to correct an
error as determined by the Courts, said Court decision being in no manner
contingent upon County Councils desire to introduce a By-Law that proposes to
reduce the number of County Councillors;
t:low TH EREFORE County Council direct that one By':Law be. prepared for the .
purpose of establishing a weighted vote for~ula for 32 members, and a separate By-
Law be prepared for the purpose of determining the futt,Jre proposed reduction in
the composition of County Council.
--
__~,.f'I'-'I'"~""""'"
12/20/2002 15:07 FAX 905 775 0153
-~--~----
BRADFQRD WESTGWILLIMBtffiY
I4J 005/006
. ,
COUNTY OF SIMCOE
~/ .//
V e~.. ""-.
J
ITEM FOR;
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT AND STRATEGIC
PLANNING COJ.\llMITTEE
SECTION:
ITEM NO.
1\lEETING DATE:
SUBJECT;
\Varden and Council
PMSP 02-013
February 14, 2002
Proposed By-law to Change the Composition and Size of County
Council and Provide for the Allocation of Weighted Votes
=
RECOMMENDATJON:
THAT the draft by-law presented in 20011O change the composition and size of Council and to
establisl} the allocation of votes among Council members be revised in Section 4, which
establishes the number of votes given to any member, and in Section 5 which establishes the
effective date of the by-law, to bring Section 4 into effect immediately upon receiving the
"trip le majority" approval pursuant to Section 26 of The Municipal Act, and to recognize the
division of weighted votes among 32 members of Council until December 1 51, 2003;
AND THAT a pubHc meeting, as required by The Municipal Act, be: held as part of the Coumy
Council meeting on Tuesday March 26,2002;
AND TRA T the necessary public notice be given for that mee6ng.
BACKGROUND:
On January 29,2002, County Council received the report of the Performance Management and
Strategic Plaoning Committee under Item PMSP 02-008, outlining the decision of the Superior
Court of Justice on the method of weighted voting at County Co unci 1. The decision c.onfim1ed that,
until a by-law regarding the matter is passed under Section 26 of The Municipal Act, the number of
weighted votes assigned to members of County Council should stand at the number in effect as of
December, 1996. That number is 108.
Given the growth in population that has occurred in the County since 1996, interest has been
expressed by members of Council to take the necessary action to restore the fOJI1mla for
determining weighted votes as soon as practical, and not to wait until December 1, 2003_
In addition, a Notic.e of Motion was presented to County Council at its January 29!h meeting stating
that:
"NOW THEREFORE County Council direct that one By-1aw be prepared
for the purpose of establishing a weighted vote formula for 32 members, and
"a separate"By-law be prepared for the purpose of detennining the future proposed
" reduction in the composition of County Council",
. -
---.
Febmary 14, 2002 Performance MaDagement & Strategic Planning PMSP 02-013
Page 2
? /
5C...v
lJ1 the preambles of the Notice of Motion it was stateq that County Council desires to increase the
weighted vote for its existing 32 members as a result of the recent Court decision, and that a
legislative requirement to hQld a public meeting must be fulfilled.
The public meeting that was held in August, 2001 proposed a By-law that would change the
composition and size of County Council and provide for the allocation of votes (weighted vote
fonnula). The legislative requirements under Section 26 were fulfill~d fOT the intent at that time.
Staff had requested a legal opinion on how the County should now proceed. In summary, in order to
bring the voting formula into effect prior to December 1, 2003, a second public meeting must be
held to present a revised by-law to the public. In addition, jt is confirmed that the desired revision
can be accomplished by passing one by-law, incorporating two effective dates (one for the voting
formuJa and a later one for the reduction in the size of Council). ill fact, our lawyers recommend
passing only one by-law to cover aJJ these matters, as two by~laws would require two more public
meetings which could lead to confnsion among the public as to Cou.ncil's intent, and also to
potential uncertainty under Section 26 ofthe Act.
To restore the method of calcula.tion using the most current nu.mber of electors, and in part, to
address the fundamental basis of the Notjce of Motion, the following process could achieve this
expeditiously and be less subject to legal challenge:
· Revise the proposed By-law to incorporate two effective dates. The allocation of votes
(weighted voting) would be effective immediately upon receiving the "triple majority". The
change in composition and size of council (reduction from 32 to 16) would also be effective
upon receiving the "triple majority" but not in force until December 1, 2003.
· Give proper notice and hold a public meetil1g as soon as is practicaL The public meeting
could be held on the same day as a County Council meeting. This would eliminate extra per
djem and.mileage costs. Advertising expenses are estimated at approximately $1,200.00.
· The By-law would then be presented to Council for support. The fonuula for the weighted
votes would be confinned, based upon Clerk's Certificates being submitted using the
number of municipal electors con finned ITom the 2000 election. The majority of the
member municipalities would need to pass resolutions consenting to the by-law, and those
municipalities must represent the majority of the county electors (triple majority)
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS;
AdvertisiDg Costs - $1,200.00
SCHEDULES:
There are no schedules to this Report.
PREPARED BY;
APPROVALS:
H. MacRae, CAO-Clerk
H. MacRae
Date
February 8, 2002
:i,,_....~ ".,.I! 1 L..,: ,.~_ _" ~ ._._ .",,~,)J.,_ L .c_'_~''''''-<''c..,>~~~....:._,.,,~4;''.}#~~~,.__.~_ .
, ~J .., _.. J~ilL .W!I!JI.,~, .,.,_...'.~ir. 4LY<j.~ .-- !t .:..",n!i)J111-=~_S...1 ~Fil ~'~1i!n.~r'
f
pf
,Jf.. J' I
~$7 -..
.~..._,.,/; """-'''" ,
Minutes
SEVERN SOUND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATIO ~
2001 FOURTH QUARTER MEETING
January 25,2002 at tbe Midland Council Cbambe
Present:
David Parks
Rimi Kalinauskas
Bill Thompson
Keith Shennan
Michele Locke
Ralph Hough
Bob Coryell
Mike Mayotte
Laurie Schutt
Paul Maurice
Regrets:
Dunc McLaren
Tom Elliott
Mark Taylor
Township of Georgian Bay
Environment Canada
Town of Midland
Severn Sound Environmental Association
Severn Sound Environmental Association
Township ofOro-Medonte
Township ofTay
Town ofPenetanguishene
Friends of the Wye Marsh
Township of Tiny
Severn Sound Public Advisory Committee
Township ofSpringwater
Township ofSevem
...-b':""
"ff""" Jr (\ _
.$"}f-"c _ ...J-''---
'-..j"'..Jf. C/
1. Selection of Chair for 2002
Keith Sherman declared the floor open to nominations for Chair for 2002,
David Parks nominated Bill Thompson. Paul Maurice seconded the nomination.
There were no other nominations.
MOTION: Moved by Bob Corye14 seconded by Ralph Hough, that nominations be closed.
MOTION: Moved by Rimi Kalinauskas, seconded by Paul Maurice, that Bill Thompson be
acclaimed Chair for 2002. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
2. Adoption of Agenda
Keith Sherman requested that the Municipal Groundwater Study be added to Other Business.
MOTION: Moved by Bob Corye14 seconded by Ralph Hough, to adopt the agenda as presented.
CARRIED.
3. Review of Minutes and Past Business
.
Action items from last Quarterly Meeting:
~ A letter has been drafted for Bill Thompson's signature and will be sent to
the clerks from each municipality requesting that the they confinn
insurance coverage for SSEA members by their municipalities.
~ The delisting process is now in Keith's hands and a draft Stage 3 document
will be available once additional comments from the Technical Review
Team are received. Essentially, there is consensus to delist on every use
impairment but the fish community. However, there is consensus that there
are factors that have come into play since Stage 2 due to harvest and zebra
mussels. It is felt that delisting can proceed if there are commitments from
other agencies for the future. Rimi Kalinauskas noted that the Technical
Review Team has reached consensus with regard to fish communities.
Keith Shennan stated that the Draft Document will go to the Technical
Review Team through Rimi Kalinauskas and the SSEA members will
receive a copy for their review.
".
MOTION: Moved by Bob Coryell, seconded by Paul Maurice, to adopt the minutes as presented.
CARRIED.
-2-
:~,::Jr : ~~~...~).~.4'1;.-Jl..;y,~.--=..._r,...<'""<',.~_';~~~~-,~AA)~.,...,..--:~,~~,,_K. ,-, . 2:1!-..., _)~~~,,(f.J. .:.t,..j{. .:~,.~Ji_~~c_~f:..~_~,^.....~.:c+~~,_,,,,_-4 .""~.~~".,..-,,.~!EtJb:'_~-!:'J;"_"'",.,_..__.t,L. J 4~.._._ [~m:__ :.~ ,,,.,..,.._~ '. ~~ L.. _ , :"'- L~.~~,.!,.Y;
4.
Fourth Quarterly Report for 2001
4.. ./ .. ~ '~
.....) ci -----
· Approval of Report
Keith Sherman asked that the 4th Quarter Report be received for information purposes rather than
approval as some items have not yet been entered.
Revenues:
This is a draft statement as some items are still being posted to our books in the Town of Midland
system. The year end statement will be available for approval at the next quarterly meeting. Bill
Thompson asked ifthere will be any adjustments made to the final statement. Keith Sherman
stated that we will have to examine the "Private/Community" amount in the future.
Expenditures:
This is a draft statement and there are going to be some minor adjustments before the year end
statement. Keith commented on a few expenditures.
· GIS base coverages amount represents time spent on these databases. It is a major
expense, but an excellent asset..
· Requests and Reviews are a possible source of future revenue. We could declare a "fee
schedule" for the County and Municipalities for specific work that isn't included in normal
SSEA work with the municipalities and those charges could be passed back to developers.
Bill Thompson commented that members have to be aware that the SSEA is a valuable
resource. David Parks stated that there should be an aggregate service for membership in
the SSEA and rriunicipalities don't want to be billed for phone calls etc. Keith Sherman
assured members that the fee schedule would not include "nonnal" SSEA services to
municipalities.
· There have been a high number of reports produced during the 2001 year and that is
reflected in the Produce Reports expenditure.
· The invoice for Flow Stations has not come in yet and Keith stated that the amount will
either have to be put into the 2002 budget or Accounts Receivable in transition. Bill
Thompson asked for a footnote on the 2001 year end report on that item and Bob Coryell
agreed that it should remain in the 2001 books.
· In draft, we have a slight deficit of$1,400.00.
MOTION: Moved by Bob Coryell, seconded by Ralph Hough, to receive the draft 4th Quarter
Report as infonnation. CARRIED.
· Approval of Cheque Register
Cheque register items:
· The Honey Harbour Survey of Water Supplies is a project on behalf of the District of
Muskoka and Township of Georgian Bay, We have surveyed all property owners for well
or intake of surface water. We took "raw" quality water. Resorts and marinas were also
-3-
r
.i~/.? I r jr
'"la ./'0
~' !
included in the survey. We have selected wells and intakes for sampling water quality and
those numbers will be analyzed and reported. This gives a "picture of water resources" for
planning purposes and information for the general public. The new legislation is still
unknown with regard to "small waterworks operations" but we will be providing an
interim report to the municipalities and will suggest additional sampling for the coming
season.
· Paul Maurice inquired about the Wye Marsh Inventory Project. Keith explained the
project and added that we were laying the framework for a complete biological inventory
in the future for the Wye Valley.
· Ralph Hough inquired about the GBA Foundation aerial photos. Keith explained that we
purchased copies of Honey Harbour photos for the Honey Harbour project. Ralph Hough
suggested a company in Oro-Medonte "Eye in the Sky" should we require future aerial
photos.
· The amount paid to Dixon Hydrogeology relates to the Municipal Groundwater Study and
that amount will be recovered as all nine municipalities involved in the study have been
invoiced equally for that amount.
MOTION: Moved by David Parks to approve the cheque register for the 4th Quarter, seconded by
Mike Mayotte. CARRIED
· Overview of Quarter
Keith Sherman presented the Quarterly Activity Report from the Severn Sound Environmental
Association Implementation Office for infonnation purposes. Bill Thompson commented that this
report only shows the "highlights" and has seen for himself that the daily schedule is
overwhelming. Keith agreed that this report only reflects public events and that there a number of
day to day activities and projects that are not listed such as the databases, ongoing regular
monitoring. These items are not "exciting" until they are summarized in reports and the changes
are evident. Keith did comment on one of the items - Regent Public School has received a lot of
recognition and attention on behalf of the Severn Sound RAP. Bill Thompson commented that
much of the thanks goes to Paul DeVillers for finding funding for the students which allowed
them to attend the Montreal Forum.
Members also received a Forecast of Revenues as information. The "Status" column refers to the
status of each project. "C" is completed, "R" is rejected and "D" is deferred until 2002. The Log
Salvage project is an example of a rejected project. Although some of the work was approved,
funding for additional sampling was rejected.
Bill Thompson took a moment to fonnally introduce Laurie Schutt, the new Executive Director of
the Wye Marsh Wildlife Centre and newest member of the SSEA. He welcomed her and
congratulated her on accepting the position at the Wye Marsh.
-4-
-ur :'.II1m.u!m!~-tI'!1[ Tr.c:.. ',iii!!'!i,"~.~,", .'.~fY.:.~;~l~-,.".< '.t;,X~JIi.n<Ji;!!!!J~.;!('i!I!?1i;lf! )1!j~,"j""T H!!L '~'!!)l .:.. _.~,..J,",~~"",,'.l!!'4i!!o:.,"~:-Iril!li!I.~i7 J'fiJfl1~.."crl "nIll)T'WIJ!!@j~r'
51, './ /'
_<C...
v
5. Budget for 2002
Keith Sherman noted that the budget presented is an interim proposal or draft. He wishes that the
budget could be increased but recognized the commitments already in place. Members signed the
new three year agreement in 2001 with municipal amounts set in that existing agreement for those
years.
Some of the costs have increased, therefore increasing expenses in the budget. The main
employees of the Severn Sound Environmental Association are Town of Midland employees and
they recently received raises. Flow station costs will also be increasing but Keith is trying to find
partners to assist with those additional costs.
Bob Coryell questioned the dollar amount of Private Projects compared to Community/Public. He
stated that if we cannot reach the goal for Community/Public, the amount. should be changed to
reflect a more reasonable amount. Keith Sherman stated that a revised forecast of revenues will be
included in the budget.
Ralph Hough commented that Keith Sherman is an administrator, not a fundraiser therefore we
need to be more realistic with fundraising and we should get our heads together to get some ideas
on how to help. Bill Thompson suggested a small Subcommittee, such as the one that put
together the new Mission Statement, to meet and discuss fundraising. Ralph Houg~ Mike
Mayotte and Bob Coryell volunteered to sit on the Fundraising Subcommittee.
MOTION: Moved by Bob Coryell to approve the interim budget for 2002, seconded by Paul
Maurice. CARRIED
6. Other Business
· Partner '8 Reception
Keith Sherman explained the purpose of the Annual Partner's Reception and two dates were put
forward to the members: Thursday, March 28,2002 and Friday, April 5, 2002. It was decided
that the date of the reception would depend on Paul DeVillers' schedule and either date was fine
with the members.
· Website
Michele Locke did a short presentation on the SSEAlSSRAP website she is working on. Public
education and interaction on environmental issues is imperative and a large part of the. work done
by the Severn Sound Environmental Association. A web site specifically designed and maintained
by the Severn Sound Environmental Association will be an important educational tool and will
allow many people access to our information and publications. There will be links to each SSEA
member's website and in turn the Severn Sound website will offer the environmental information
-5-
L;,/ .: /,
~~ ~
that municipal residents and employees need. The annual cost for the website will only be $85.00
which includes the domain name www.sevemsound.ca and web hosting at Compusolve. We
anticipate a good public response to the website. Links ",ill be forwarded to members so that they
can review it and make comments before we officially launch the site.
Keith is hoping to find some project funding for the website in the future.
David Parks suggested that we move toward less paper in the future and start using email more
for SSEA correspondence. Keith Shennan stated that we will make a commitment to becoming
more electronic, We have tried this approach with the Public Advisory Committee and 80% of the
mailing list is now through email only. Ralph Hough agreed with this approach. He only receives
his mail from the Township Office once a week therefore email would be his preferred method for
receiving correspondence.
· Municipal Groundwater Study
Keith Sherman updated members on the North Simcoe Municipal Groundwater Study. There is a
commitment from nine municipalities to participate in the Groundwater Study. The Ministry of the
Environment (MaE) wants seamless groundwater mapping and they don't have much information
on Simcoe County. A Steering Committee made up of municipal planners and public works
supervisors was set up and have met a number of times. A Letter ofConfinnation was sent to the
MaE from the SSEA on behalf of the nine municipalities and the letter was accepted by the
MaE. Garfield Dunlop announced the $602,000.00 North Simcoe project in November and also
announced the SSEA as the lead for this project. MOE is funding 85% of the project with the
municipalities paying the remaining 15%. Unfortunately, the province will not allow the SSEA to
take any money for the administration of this project but there are some components of this
project that the SSEA Office will have to handle and Keith is hopeful that it can somehow be
billed back to the project.
To date, a request for a Letter ofInterest was sent to 27 consultants and from the respondents, a
short list of four consultants was approved by the Steering Committee. Those consultants will
receive a Request for Proposal, which has to be approved by the MaE, and will be presenting to a
Selection Committee in February. .
There is also a collaboration with the Lake Simcoe Conservation Authority and the Nottawasaga
Valley. Conservation Authority. There is a 5km buffer incorporated into the study as the results
must be seamless.
Bill Thompson commented that as the lead of this project, the SSEA is providing a valuable
service to member municipalities and to the MaE.
Keith Shennan stated that there some benefits to being the lead for this project, but he has yet to
figure out what they are. If the SSEA hadn't been at the first meeting, others, with little
-6-
~ '.""~-'-~
5 c/-::;
experience with or knowledge of North Simcoe would be handling the project. The fact that the
SSEA was granted the lead ensures that others know we exist and it proves that the SSEA has
continued value.
Bill Thompson agreed and noted that this will allow for creative public relations work with the
MaE and may offer future opportunities,
David Parks inquired if this project will cost the SSEA anything and Keith Shennan assured him
that he wouldn't allow that. This should be a benefit to member municipalities without any cost.
Keith Sherman also noted that the SSEA will retain a copy of the deliverables for this project as
well as Simcoe County and MaE. .
Ralph Hough commented that the Township ofOro-Medonte portion ofthe Municipal
Groundwater study involves three organizations including SSEA, LSCA and the NVCA. The
Township is very committed to their partnership with the Severn Sound Environmental
Association.
Keith Sherman stated that as the project unfolds, there will be reports back to the SSEA and there
is a requirement for public meetings so that members and residents will be kept informed of the
process.
7. Next Meeting and Adjournment
Meetings were scheduled for the following year as follows: 1st Quarter Meeting - April 19, 2002
2nd Quarter Meeting - July 19,2002, 3rd Quarter Meeting - October 18, 2002 and 4th Quarter
Meeting - January 24,2003. All meetings will be held in the Midland Council Chambers at lOam
on these dates.
The Fundraising Committee will meet in Board Room B at the Midland Town office, 10 am on
February 8, 2002.
MOTION: Moved by Bob Coryell to adjourn the meeting, seconded by Mike Mayotte.
CARRIED
Meeting was adjourned at 12:05 pm.
Additional Note re: Partners' Reception:
It has been confirmed that Paul DeVillers and Garfield Dunlop are available on Friday,
April 5, 2002 to attend the Partners' Reception.
-7-
Helping kids with
physical disabilities
and their families
80 Bradford St.,
Suite 125
Barrie, Ontario
L4N 6S7
Telephone
705-737-2621
Fax
705-737-9951
Toll Free
1-800-461-3391
E-mail
info@easterseals.org
Website
www.easterseals.org
/
,
\
February 14, 2002
Mayor Ian Beard
P.O. Box 100
Oro Station, ON LOL 2XO
Dear Mayor Ian Beard,
2002 marks 80 years of Easter Seals helping children, youth and young adults with
physical disabilities to reach their full individual potential and highest level of
independence! We hope you will help us celebrate this occasion and salute the
20,000 kids with physical disabilities in your community and across Ontario
From March 1 to 31, 2002, The Easter Seal Society will hold its Spring Campaign
featuring exciting fundraisers in communities across the province, encouraging
people to give to help children with physical disabilities. With their support, Easter
Seals is able to fund disability solutions that make a big difference to our kids and
their families - to purchase expensive equipment needed for mobility and
communication, send kids to summer camp and invest dollars in research and
prevention.
"March is Easter Seal Month!" is a great opportunity to spread the word about the
support that Easter Seals and its network of dedicated volunteers provide disabled
kids in your community. We would be most grateful if you would consider
declaring March as Easter Seal Month with a formal proclamation.
As a thank you for your proclamation, we'd like to honour your support publicly by
presenting the official 2002 Easter Seal. The cheerful 'Easter Seal' was originally
created in 1947 as a symbol of resurrection and new life. This presentation brings a
long-standing tradition back to life, where local Easter Seal children presented the
annual seal to dignitaries in their community -a perfect way to mark our 80th
anmversary.
We do hope that your schedule allows you to participate in this brief ceremony.
Thank you for taking the time to consider declaring "March is Easter Seal Month!"
We hope our local child representatives will have the honour of thanking you in
person. I will contact your office next week; however, should you have any further
questions, please contact me at (phone number).
Respectfully yours,
4). /JIi;ixv
Maryanne Dobbie
District Coordinator
Encl.
Incorporated as the Ontario Society for Crippied Children ~'f
Charitabie Registration NO.119068377 RR0001
.
WHEREAS:
WHEREAS:
WHEREAS:
WHEREAS:
WHEREAS:
// ,.-,
'" e _..J------
J C
PROCLAMA TION
"March is Easter Seal Month"
2002 marks 80 years of The Easter Seal Society of Ontario
helping children, youth and young adults with physical
disabilities reach their highest level of independence.
Over 8,000 families rely on Easter Seals to purchase expensive
equipment needed for mobility and communication, send kids to
summer camp, provide access to information and programs and
invest dollars in research and prevention.
The Easter Seal Society continues to find ways to empower
children, youth and young adults with physical disabilities
through its programs and services, helping them to reach their
individual potential. The Society is "creating solutions,
changing lives ".
Through our network of community partners, volunteers, parents
and donors across the province, Easter Seals touches every
Ontario community.
The annual Easter Seal Campaign is one of the most important
fundraising initiatives undertaken by Easter Seals. It's a great
opportunity for communities to get involved and make a
difference.
I, Ian Beard, Mayor of the Township ofOro-Medonte, do hereby
proclaim March 2002 as "Easter Seal Month" and encourage
everyone to support Easter Seals during its fundraising
campaIgn.
NOW THEREFORE:
..
6ft
eL' HL-. \"
~(.
N'O (, JJ c..c ft.}-Is,
TOWNSHIP OF SPRINGW A TER .A-l- 1-/2.lI..z...
SiMCOE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTRE, 1110 HIGHW ^ Y 26,
MlDH.lIRST, ONTARIO LOL lXO
TELEPHONE: 705-728-4784
FAX COVER SHEET
....-...
No. of Pages:
10
Date: February 19.2002
Time:
RE:
The fo!lowing
Committee of Adjustment Notice - G. Janda for B. Meinzinger (803102)
TO:
FROM:
K. Elaine Cairncross, Secretary-Treasurer, Committee of Adjustment
Simcoe Muskoka District Catholic
School Board
46 Alliance Boulevard
Barrie, ON
L4M 5K3
Fax No. 727-1451
Le Conseil scolaire de district du
Centre-Sud-Ouest
1 Vanier Drive
Suite 101
Weiland, ON
L3B 1A1
Fax No. (905)732-1628
NOTE: Don Priest, Public Works Superintendent
Eleanor J. Rath, Clerk
Paul Flindall, cao
Personal Delivery
Nottawasaga Valley Conservation
Authority
R. R. # 1
Angus. ON
LOM 1 BO
Fax No. 424-2115
Township of Oro-Medonte
Clerk's Office
P. O. Box 100
Om, ON
LOL 2XO
Fax No. 487-0133
Planning Department
Clerk
County of Simcoe
Administration Centre
Midhurst, ON
LOL 1 XO
Personal Delivery
Ministry of Transportation
Owen Sound District Office
P. O. Box 520
Owen Sound, ON M4K 5R1
ATTN: Mr. Phil Gignac
Fax No. 519-376-6842
Conseil scolaire de district catholique
Centre-$ud no. 64
110 Drewry Avenue
Toronto, ON
M2M 1 C8
Fax No. (416) 397-6576
Ministry of Transportation
Southwestern Regional Office
659 Exeter Road
London, Ontario
Attn: Mr. Ian Smyth
Corridor Control Office
Fax No. (519) 873-4600
G. Janda (Agent)
16 Buttercup Lane
Elmvale, ON
lOL 1 PO
By Mail
O~f~ 30'Vd
~ndv~:v ~O-6~-~3~
~LS6geUSOL
!OS~~ 13r~3S'Vl dH :A8 IN:
L.S698C:L.S0L.
s r ;r-
Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and
Rural Affairs
2284 Nursery Road
Midhurst, ON
LOL 1 XO
Fax No, 725-7296
-,... _. _-, I
'/CI':Ot:l?ICnJ
~os~e l3r~3SVl dH :A6 ~
TOWNSHIP OF SPRINGWATER
SIMCOE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTRE
MIDHURST, ONTARIO
LOL 1 XO
51-3
NOTICE
FILE NO. 803/02
G. JANDA FOR V. & B. MEINZINGER
IN THE MATTER OF Section 53 of The Planning Act of Ontario, R.S.O. 1990, c_P.13, as amended
-and-
IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BY G. Janda on behalf of Vince 8. Blanche Meinzinger, owners of Part Lot 64,
Concession 1, and more particularly described as Parts 3,4,6 & 7, Plan 51R-30859. and known municipally as 5394
Penetanguishene Road for approval to sever a 33-foot wide strip of land known as Buttercup Lane (Part 3), to be merged
with and provide access to lands to the north owned by Garry Janda. The owneT intends to retain a 20.055 acre parcel of
vacant land (Parts 4,6 & 7). A key map is Included fOT convenience in identifying the subject property.
The Committee of Adjustment for the Township of Springwater appoints the 6th day of MARCH, 2002, at the hour of 8:00
p.m. (Local Time) in the Council Chambers, Kenzie Knox Buildlna. 35 Queen Street West. in Elmvale (side entrance),
for the Hearing of the appHcation.
Members of the Committee of Adjustment may wish to view the subject property prior to the date of the meeting.
Should you desire to express your approval or objection to the application, you may do so at the public hearing. If it is
inconvenient for you to attend the hearing. a siQned written submission shall be accepted by the secretary-Treasurer prior
to or during the hearing and such written submission shall be available for inspection by any interested party. If you do not
make a written submission requesting notification ofthe Committee's decision or attend the hepring, you will not be entitled
to receive any further notification ofthe proceedings. Request for deferral ofthe hearing date must be for reasonpble cause
and an alternate hearing date will be at the discretion of the Committee. Failure of the applicant(s) or their authorized agent
to appear at any hearing may result in the automatic dismissal of the application.
If a person or public body that files an appeal of a decision of the Committee of Adjustment for the Township of Springwater
in respect of the proposed consent does not make written submission to the Committee of Adjustment for the Township
of Springwater before it gives or refuses to give a provisional consent, the Ontario Municipal Board may dismiss the appeal.
If you wish to be notified of the decision of the Committee of Adjustment for the Township of S pri ngwater in respect of the
proposed consent, you must make written request to the Secretary-Treasurer, Committee of Adjustment, Township of
Springwater. Simcoe County Administration Centre, (Lower East Wing) 1110 Highway No. 26, Midhurst, Ontario, LOL !XO.
Additional information regarding the application is available for inspection at the Township of Springwater Offices, Lower
East Wing, County Administration Centre. 1110 Highway No. 26, Midhurst, Ontario during regular office hours, Monday
to Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
DATED AT MIDHURST, ONTARIO this 19111 day of FEBRUARY. 2002.
I CERTIFY that a true copy of this notice was mailed to the following persons and public bodies:
The Owner. Vince & Blanche Meinzinger
The Agent: Garry Janda
The Clerk of the Township of Springwater
The Planner for the Township of Springwater
The Issuer of Building Permits for the Township of Springwater
The Secretary of the Springwater Planning Committee
The Road Superintendent for the Township of Springwater
The Drainage Superintendent for the Township of Springwater
Nottawasaga Velley Conservation Authority
Simcoe County Planning Department
Ministry of Tranasportation
Simcoe Muskoka District Catholic School Board
Conseil scohaire publique du district Centre-Sud-Ouest
Conseil scoleire du district catholique no. 64
Property Owners Within 60 Metres
Township of Ora-Medonte
K. E\aine Cairn cross, Secretary
Committee of Adjustment
Telephone: (705) 728-4784 (Ext. 232)
Fax: (705) 728-8957
o ~ Ie 30VcI
!nclS~:v ~O-6~-83~
!LS6ge~LSOL
!os~e ~3r~3SVl clH :A8 ~N=
;~-i
. I
I
I
..-f"
".,10;", J
.,/ ~~"",,/
..<" . ;}
..' "".
.,' <;/.. ....,
00" ("'} _, '"
..../".
KEY MAP
--~
!
~
l.t_..
~.~..
;:...--:.~ .::--;.;:.:
t
~
.~
Ii
~
;;;
..
..
~ i
~ j . .
.. ~.J
~
;;: Q
~ .i
~, '" .; .. ...
'"' ~ '"
"..:
..
..
0-
J
.
...
<:> <::>
-t1
~
~
~
~
~ '!i
.
~ ~; ~
II ::
., ~ ..
"
~
,.
': I
. "
. ~! I
...j
II"
~ ~;
~i
,
~~:
S!. :
;
~
r"
~.
~:;
NO/ c's ,....., ^ !() /')
.::::> ~_-:J......//V....~......
!
~
I
. -
i
~ I
.
~ ';>
; w
-fo J!3.tC ...:5E.YJ!!:'~En
j
~
,j . i
"-~~.."=;: "
"".,,,, ~,..~.
-..--
n LIt:> =1n'<f..!
~W..!~2:t:> 20-6L-83~
~L<;;6geC:LSOL
/ Sfc;
."
"
"
~os~e L3r~3$Vl dH :A8 L~
. ""'...................
.
.-
~ompleleness of the Applicatio.a
The Information In this. form that must be proYided by the
applicant Is Indicated by black an-ows on the lefl side of the
. section numbers.. This Information Is prescnbed in the
Sc;hech.Jie to Ontario Regula60n 4lI9S made under the Planning
Act. The mancfltory information must be provided with the
appropriate. fee. If the mandatory Information and fee of
$400.00 aro not provided, the Secretary of the Committee of
Aqustment Wl1J return the application until the information and
ffte have battn provided.
The application form a/so sats out other Information that will
ss;./$t the Committee of Aqustmont and othef'$ in their panning
evaluation of the consent application. To ensuro the quickest
and most complete roview, this Information t;hould be submitted
at the. 6me of application. In the absence of this lnformaDon, it
may not be ~sib/e to do it COOJpIete roYiew wfChin the
leglstated time frame for making a decision. As B result, the
apPlics60n may be refusad.
Pleas.e Print and Complete or (....) Appropriate BOx(fJ$)
Submission of the Application sf:- s
One application form ij.requ/re5L!or each parce
be severed. AI" ') () 0 . -
The application fee is $ptf:OO per application.
3 copies of the completed application fonn ,
shetch are required by rhe Committee
Adjustmont.
Measurements ere '0 be in metric uni,.s.
For Help
i30.J/()~
To help you understand the consent process, and Infonn~
neode<t fO mal<g a planning decl$ion on U1e application rei
the "Application Gu;de Q & A". For more InformatJo~ 0'
PlannlngAcr, the consent proCNS or pI'OVlncial policies, pi
.see the "Guide '0 Planning Applications" and
"Comprehensive Set of Policy Stat4lm8nts-.
or
comsa the Secretary of the Committee of Adjustment, Spring
Town$hip, Simcoe County Admirm.trBtlon CentnJ, Mldhurst. 01
LOL lXO. Cel! (705) 728-4784,
rr~
1. Appffoant Infonnatlon .
.... 1.1 Nemo ot G
O-V'V'
';"1.2
..
()Y\,
1~ Name of the pM.on wOO Is to be ~ ebod the appDcatJon. if different
=~finn __ on boh,Ww ~__)
2. Locatlon of the Subject Land (Complete applicable boxes in 2.1)
..... 2.1
ON
BU$jne~ IEtIEtphone NQ.
r _. '3 2-'L-/GQ-
P<>61a1 Code
DL 0
\:::-~
I:; r.p_ ~~--
..... 2.2 Are there 81IY __moms or ~ ~ atteccIng the tubJect IIind?
ONo t<<".. II ".., cIeso1be .he .asetMnt or CO\I8nant and Ita etfeot.
Fa .S' R. \N-.. ~~,~ -f f ':> ~.""
ROW
ttC1 ~
p
o us 30itd
~ndS':p 'O-6~-83j
:LS6ge'LSOL
,
.os~~ l3r~3Sitl dH :A8 IN
-- - _....--- -. . ..................
II-- 3.1 Type ..nd purpose of prO~ed transection (check ~propriate DOX)
- .' Transfer OC.-eatlon of Ii n_loI rgfAddltlon tel a lot OM e~l'I\4Inl
Othef OA charge 0" klase OA corroctlon of tille
... 3.2 Name 01 persoo(s). if knCMIn. 10 ~om Ia11d or inlerest In land is to ~ trAl\sh~rred, leasOO or charged
5 ! '-'G
o Other pUrpo$e
3.3 If III 101 addition, Ido~tlfy Ih~.I~s 10 which the p,rcel will be added.
L()-f' 61 'PC'{II'" 3
4. Oes.crtpUon of Subject l.8nd end Senllctng InfonnaUon (Complete each subsectioo.)
Sev9red
R.xalnod
.... 41.1 Description
frontage (m.)
-~<. ...............
Pro~ U$$(ti)
eJdsting
,
1("
--.-.....-
Doplh (m.)
, ... ~.2 UM of Property
Area (ha.)
EJ<I$ting Use(s}
.... .c.3 B\.IlldlR941 or
Str\iCtU/'fl
P~ed
III>- ..4 Ac.ce.. Provincial Highway
(check appropriate
~pEWe) MunICIpal road. maintained all year
Munlolpel road. soasonBlty miUntIIIne<I
Othef public road
C.iJ
kc~, t ~
I (
Right of _y
....
..$ W.ter Supply Publidy owned e.nd operated
piped water sys\em
(Chedc PrMdety owned and operated
~ IndIvldu8l1YVI
PrivaSety owned and opeRWtd
oommuneJ we_ '..
l.eJ(e or other waler ~
Water Aooess (If ao, desa1be befow)
0esc0be in eection 9.1. 1M paI1dog and docktng facilities 10 be used and the app<<>xlmate di8te.oce of the" facilities 1rom the sub'"
and the nMte$t public ~. ' ' .
OIher meanI
III>-
ru= 0WIMId~ ..
..6 s.wage $.en MWIIQ. ,
D1spouI Prtvlaly owned and operated
(Check tndIvIdual ~ tank' "
=="* Privately owned end opera~
comnunal eeptIc ~m
PrIvy
Other It'IotHInS
..7 Other 8eMeeI
Ohedt If the
.eMce ..
avaJIebIe
(1) "c;ertJliarte of epprovaI from the 10681 Health Unh or MIniS1/')' of the EnvIronment anc:I Energy IUbmltted wfth thIS
~~~-l.\
~.. If ~ to thII aubkx:t land ~ by prtYate road, or tI ..other pub/I(: road" or "t1ght Of way" was Indicated In MCUon 4.4, indicate WhO OWN ~ Ian
VIflO .. ntSponaIbIe lor hi maJl1tenaJ'ICe and Whether ilia rmdntalned ~Iy or all year, ,
M,tJ';k..f4~'''' ~~ A II Y"6-Y (l~u.~
11011!1M151
n l 10 :m'li~
~W~Q7.=v 7.0-6~-83~
~LS6ge'LSOL
~OS~t: J.3r\:l3S'\11 dH =A8 .1.1
---
5: Ulnd Use ..:.; r --t
j...s.1 What Is the 6)(isting otf1c'a~eslgnatiOf\(B). il any. of Ihe sUbiee;, land? .-..-...-'
L_o..fL.-~ ~:d -e.. ..____.___._. _'~.'__"
6.2 :~at IS the zllngif any;~ tn.?ibs'a;t" the 5\Jbj~ land .1$ <;_:=..=~'S zoning oroe~... wM\ i~ the Ontario. ReglJla1ion NUfI1berr-
6.3 Are any 01 the follOWIng US{!$ or lealur9$ on the subject 13M or wllhin SOO molfu 01 thl! $ubJect land, unlo!!!! o!horwlse spec,hed. '-.,
Please c~k !.tie epproprlSle boKeR. if any spply.
- . ~-~-
Use Or F~81Ufe On the Wlthirt Soo MeJres 01 S~bject
SUbJect Laoo Lana. unless otherwise speclliec
.. ,._~ (Indlc~ a'p'p-roxirnal~ dlsleoc.!l
An agricullllral oper:lltlon. including IIveSlock faclllly or Sloc:l\yatd .- _. ..
'-
A lendtlll
~...."- -
A sewage treatment planl Of waste stabllizstion plant .
-'- V
A prQVincialfy signllicant wetland (Class " 2 or 3 wetl$lld)
A provincially sigoilicant wetland within 12() m&tres of the sut>Ject land N/A
- ...- -- .
Flood plain
A mhabUIUlted mine sile
... .
A noo~paratlng mine site wllhln 1 kNometre 01 ltIe liub;eCllana
An active mine site
AA lnduS1n.t Dr commenjal use, and spe~fy the uliIE($)
An ac1iv$ railway line
A munlclplll Of federal ait'pOft
6. History of the Subject bnd
... 4.1 Has the s~bjec:t land ever bgen the subject of an application tor apprQval 01 a pJan of svbdlvis;on or oonsEtnl under the Planning Act?
Uves 01'10 oUnknown If Yes 4Ind If Known, provide the Minlstry'1ij application tile number and the decision made on the appllcatlon_
J
IlILf /20() I
T I
&.2
, describEi how it ~ been changed from the original appli<;ation
.... 6:3 ~ 81'\)' land boen sever&d Irvm the parcel originally acquired by the owner of the sub}$Ct land?
~v_ 01'10 If "tee. pnwide for 8~h parceI1Kl'(Qf$d. ltIe date of transfer, the name of the transferee and the 1a11d use,
8 j IfI,'2. 0 D J
7. CUrrent ApplICations
.... 1.1 II 1M ...,bj4lct lend currently the *ubjeC\ of iii proposed officia) plan Of Qfficla1 plan amMldment that has be&n submitted 10 the Minister for appl'O'lal"4
V.. 01'10 0 Unknown ., Yes, and If Known, lilpeclfy the Ministry flle number and 81.atus of the appllcat~.
<1'1
... 7.2 k!he IUbjeal tel'1(j the tlub)ect Of an app!loaUon tor a ~Ing by-law liU1Iendment, M.ni&ter's :zoning order em..ndrnent. minor variance, con5&nl or
IIppfO'Y!II of . PM f)f eubcllvlalOn't
OV.. oNo OUnflnown " Ves, a11d.1t Known, specify tM appropr\a1e tlte oumber and ~I of the ~1Ioa~_
1101 4OGIM)
o U L. 3E1'1i'd
~~d9':t 'O-5~-83~
~L96ge'L90L
,
.09~t; l3r/;l35'1i'1 dH :A8 JoN
t\.. 'Ske1Ct' {use tile al\<icnea tit<etcn :SI'lCC\) 10 '11elp you prepare me sKetell, reH:H 10 lilt: dmU';IIl.'U OdlllfJll;! ;::'KU1CII. L:- r:. 0/
.... 8.1 The ~pplication shall be accompanied by a sketch showing the fonowing: 0 (j
.:
. tho boundaries and dimensions of (he subject land. the part that is to be severed and .the part that is to be retained
. the boundariAs and dimensions of any land owned by the owner of the subject laod and that abuts the subject land
· the distance between the sUbject land and the nearest township lot line or landmark. such as a ral/way crOSSing or brid
· the location of all land previously s9Verod from the patcel originally acquired by the current owner of the subject l<tnd
· the approximate location of all natural and artiflclal1eatures on the subject land and adjacent lands that in the oplniQI)
the applicant may sHeet the application. such 85 bUildings. railways. roads, wa.tercourses, drainage ditches, river or
stream banks. wetlands, wooded areas, wells and septic tanks
· the existing use(s) on adjaoent lands
· the location. width and name of any roads within or abutting the subjoct land, indicating whether it is an unopened roa.
allowance, II. public trsvelled road, a private road or 8 right of way' .
· If access to the subject land Is by water only. the location of tho parking and boat docking facl\1tles to be used
· the location and nature of any easement aHecting the subject land
9. Other In'onnation
SU Is there any other informalion that you think may be useful to the Ministry or other agencies In reviewing this application?
so, el<plaln below or attach on iii sepa.rate page.
I tv" id./J. Il~l<~fo ,D...+t~c.t) (1; v,..+f€-V'(", /..,wD L_CtlJ!,-R.., J;.iii
' /J J- J. 1'--
.+l> L 0+ b]; r 0.... V-I J; 7"t:> C\ <: c. A ~ 'b.d, ~~
5 ~ J e v l2-1A.<">~ ,All //C.cd-.'CiV\. .~ ~ I ~/ q q
'-"
10. Affidavit or Sworn Declaration
.. 10.' Affidavit or Sworn Declaration for thePresorlbed Information
I, b CA V rf ~r CA.v.....ef.. q of the ~') : ~ J t.'\ " /1 . >~ ~{ Sn.~.I.c: IN~(,
4 . -,.... I J
In the ,0 . j ,> (}f' ~:A.. ~4. make oath and $sy (or solemnly declare) that the information cont8ln~
Sections 1.1. 1,2. 2, 3.1, . 4,1 to 4.6 .inclusive. 5.1. 6.1, 6.3, 7, and 8 of this appllo&tion is true and that the informaUc
contained in the documents tha.t accompany this. application In respect of the sbove Sections i$ true. '
Sworn (or declared) before me
at the ~.L/~J.."'i-/IP tJl""" 6jP~/~i9~
I" the . ~1IJ.I7"'(/ c::;r: 6;.IYY L;,)E"'"
.
this /.t/.,.J/ day of '"/A:'~~.I9~y .>9"':~
". .
~~~~~.,
the TOwnship Of Sprlngwater,
10.2 Affldavl~~~on for Requested Information
I -.g <:A. ~;" " I:t (". of the :L <N ,~ ~ J.. · '0 1$+ s;,,,,' '^t" '
~ ,he Lo ....~ c~ .' {",.Q. make oath and "y (or "",emnly doCla~) tha'lho Inf~a\1on ':nto
Sections 1.3, 3.3. 4_ . 4.8, 5.2, 5.3, 6.2 and 9 of this appllC6tlon is true &."d that the information oontalned In the dOCU1
that accompany this appllcaUon in respect of the above Secttons is true.
Swom (or declared) before me
at the ~~~JP tf),.- c:5.1""~~~oii-:rrr~
in the &...hII.JrY OF" ~~
this /!/Y';/ day of /e-iI1~U~"y . ~~~
,~hLl~ ~~;...,.~
- KI~n Ei-aina ~_e,I<a'W~!~tA~ etc., -.-----.-
the ~hip of Sprlngwater.
f)q;Ifm October 4, 2003.
1101 (O:W51
Ii I IQ ::iC'\"'...
~W...07:~ 7n-RL-p.~~
:L<:;698USOL
:OS~8 13r~3$Vl dH :A8 ~
'1, AuthQflUtlOns
.,' .... 11.1 If the applicant is not the owner of the land that is the sublect of this application, the written authorization'of' the ~vier
· thai the applicant is authorized to make the apPlication must be Includ~d wi1h this form or the authorization set out' bolo".
must be completed.
Authorization (}f Owner for Agent to Make the AppUcation
I,
, am the owner of the land that is the Subject 01 this appliCation lor a conse
and I authorize
\0 make this application on '~y bcha
.-.
Signature 01 Owner
Date
1.1.2 If the applicant is not the owner of the land that is the subject of this application, complete the authoritation of the ownc:
concerning personallnlormatlon set out below,
.
Authorization of Owner for Agent to Provide Personal Information.
I, . _ , am the owner of the land that is the subject ot t
application for a consent and for the purposes of the Freedom of Information end Protection of Privacy Act, I author
. . as my agent for this application, to provide any of my personal inform at
that will be included in this application or collected during the processing of the application.
Date
Signature of the OWner
12. Conflent of the Owner
Complete the consent of the owner concerning personal in.formation ~et out below.
Consent of the Owner to the Use and Disclosure of Personal Information
I. . am the owner of the land that is the subject of this coosent a.pplication
f~ the porposes of the freedom of Infonnatlon end Protection of Privacy Act, 1 authorize and consent to the use by or the
disctosure to any person or public body ot any personal information that Is collected under the authority of the Planning Act ft
the purposes of prooessing this application.
. Date
Signature of the Owner
The Committee of Adjustmentwitl assign 8 Ale Number for complete applications end this should be used
in an communlcatiof1$.
APPUCANT'S CHECKUST:
H.ve you remembered to ~tlach:
1.. copies of the completed application form?
.t.. coptes of the sketch?
$400.00 _wficafion fee?
FORWf'RD 1"9:
(705) 728-4784
FAX (705) 728-6957
SPRlNGWA'fER TOWNSHIP
E1.AINE CAlRNCROSS
SI"..c.RIITAI'.Y TO COMMITn;f. OF AQJU~TM61'n'
PlANNING .. 'Dt,'VEI.oPMENT COORDlNKI'()R
Committee of Adjustment
T ownshtp of Sprlngwater
S1mcoe County Admln1stration Centre
MlDHURST, Ontario LOL 1XO
Simcoe County Administration Centre, 1110 Hwy 26
Midhurst, Ontario, Canada LOL lXO
cmalt: springwatcl'"@simcoe.net
o U6 30\1d
~~d9~:t CO-6~-83~
~LS6gecLSOL
,
.OS~~ 13r~3$\11 dH :A8 IN
. ~~-('::C~-- ~~~;;);~ b:' .... To FiMJ """ rvI~J' :'--~'l':=~~JtJ. tlBl\r::m:....~-. ---.\... '--. .~--~:;.~=~. ~ F'... .:6
_ n( 'A'MID " . ~.... 1-. II"')
!-eel 0.3048 Mctr<!S V' "" n ,../'./'" ,. -IV - --
./ -,
ACfc' OA04G HeC1~.es I
.::!J') -:--.-.:::.... -'.j _:. . ....:;;:::::: N
__ _... . _ _.._' -.,(vCf'U\ l\ . ~'I,;' .,.....~
~c.o.../ ~ . .
.'':'/' .
-
.
.J
~
~
..J
~
~
...
~
~
AU,Ct.J1.. rultAl,...
k 5()O""
};f- ---- ----
\
,
\
1
,
,
\
~ I-cr {f
~ &;'1'1, (V
....
....
....::. I.aSh?
, ....
:::
I t
, ~
~
, '-I
\ :
1 ~
1 't
I ~
J~
~
0.8 hQ ~
V
,.u ",..uS: .
1s.<<....,&.C.f~'f:HJ i
10 fP~~ .~'!.'-~....-.
~1 0
~ C C ""'U'I''''~~
lfrA1"".1oI
y
N
n 0 S.A'<I'I
o,J
'lit
~
...J
~
\J
.....
II(
'b
"'III:
L~"" "
tAl'!. II J
o
! O'
~ZgA~ \ ,
.,.~..
/.D.,. 18
co~. ,V.
1101 (OGoti1
-- -. -_.
, It'''''~nn"::',,,,,''''
r--'"
I I
I ,
I I
'-__......_J
CJ
<:> Cl'iiAC ,N
. L,.or /6
Gtg,.,. 1/1.
9nf,. ror::' /.0/6#n,yS
(-40 Aecfare$)
Area f;., be Seyt?red
(0,8 hecfdre)
~ncl~ I~r~~qw, ~~ :AQ II
TO:
RE:
FROM:
L..~ C C< I \ \.or . '(
09-1 ~~.
^,'O (,)N<.(.HJS
TOWNSHIP OF SPRINGW A TER ./i-t- 7-/2-1102..-
SIMCOE COUNTY ADMINISTRA nON CENTRE, 1110 HIGHWAY 26,
MJDHURST,ONTARlO LOL 1 XO
TELEPHONE: 705-728-4784
FAX COVER SHEET
.. .._......~._~-_...
No. of Pages:
fo
Date: February 20,2002
Time:
.. . ......_~-----_..
" . ..~. ..~.... ~. ,
The following
Committee of Adjustment Notice - Garry Janda (A04/02)
K. Elaine Cairncross, Secretary-Treasurer, Committee of Adjustment
Simcoe Muskoka District Catholic
School Board
46 Alliance Boulevard
Barrie, ON
L4M 5K3
Fax No. 727-1451
Le Conseil scolaire de district du
Centre-Sud-Ouest
1 Vanier Drive
Suite 101
Weiland, ON
L3B 1A1
Fax No. (905) 732-1628
NOTE: Don Priest, Public Works Superintendent
Eleanor J. Rath, Clerk
Paul Flindall, CBO
Personal Delivery
9/~ 30'Y'd
Ministry of Transportation
Owen Sound District Office
P. O. Box 520
Owen Sound, ON M4K 5R1
A TIN: Mr. Phil Gignac
Fax No. 519-376-6842
Nottawasaga Valley Conservation
Authority
RR#1
Angus, ON
LOM 1 BO
Fax No. 424-2115
Ministry of Transportation
Southwestern Regional Office
659 Exeter Road
London, Ontario
Attn: Mr. Ian Smyth
Corridor Control Office
Fax No. (519) 873-4600
Planning Department
Clerk
County of Simcoe
Administration Centre
Midhurst, ON
LOL 1 XO
Personal Delivery
Township of Oro-Medonte
Clerk's Office
P. O. Box 100
Oro, ON
LOL 2XO
Fax No. 487-0133
Conseil scolaire de district catholique
Centre-Sud no. 64
110 Drewry Avenue
Toronto, ON
M2M 1 ca
Fax No. (416) 397-6576
!~d'O:~ ,O-O,-S3d
!LS6ge,LSOL
!OS~~ 13r~3$'Y'l dH :A6 IN
L.S698cL.S0L.
TOWNSHIP OF SPR1NGWATER
SIMCOE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTRE
MJDHURST. ONTARIO
LOL 1XO
3~ ~ d----
J
NOTICE
FILE NO. A04/02
GARRY JANDA
IN THE MATTER OF Section 45 of The Planning Act of Ontario, R.S.O. 1990, c.P.13 as amended
-and-
IN THE MATTER OF an application by Sara & Garry Janda, owners of lands described as Part
Lot 65, Concession 1, being Part 5 on Plan 51R-26561 and known municipally as 5410
Penetanguishene Road to obtain approval of relief from Section 2.4.3(a) of By-law 1990-22 for the
former Township of Medonte, as amended, insofar as it relates to minimum lot frontage. The said
lands are the subject of Consent File 818/99 to be heard concurrently.
MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE REQUIRED
PROPOSED
30 METRES
19.126 METRES
THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT for the Township of Springwater appoints the 6th day of
MARCH, 2002 at the hour of 8:05 pm (local time) in the Council Ch~mber8, Kenzie Knox Building,
35 Queen Street West. Elmvale. Ootarlo, (side entrance) for the Hearing of the application. A key
map is attached to assist in locating the subject property.
Members of the Committee of Adjustment may wish to view the subject property prior to the date of
the meeting.
Should you desire to express your approval or objection to the application, you may do so at the public
hearing. If it is inconvenient for you to attend the hearing, a signed written submission shall be accepted by
the secretary-Treasurer prior to or during the hearing and such written submission shall be available for
Inspection by any interested party. If you do not make a written submission requesting notification of the
Committee's decision or attend the hearing. you will not be entitled to receive any further notification of the
proceedings. Request for deferral of the hearing date must be for reasonable cause and an alternate
hearing date will be at the discretion of the Committee. Failure of the applicant(s) or their authorized agent
to appear at any hearing may result in the automatic dismissal of the application.
If a person or public body that files an appeal of a decision of the Committee of Adjustment for the
Township of Springwater in respect of the proposed consent/variance does not make written
submission to the Committee of Adjustment for the Township of Springwater before it gives or refuses
to give a minor variance, the Ontario Municipal Board may dismiss the appeal.
If you wish to be notified of the decision of the Committee of Adjustment for the Township of
Springwater in respect of the proposed minor variance, you must make written request to the
Secretary-Treasurer, Committee of Adjustment, Township of Springwater, Simcoe County
Administration Centre, (Lower East Wing) 1110 Highway 26, Midhurst, Ontario LOL 1XO.
Additional information regarding the application is available for inspection at the Township of
Springwater Offices, Lower East Wing, Simcoe County Administration Centre, 1110 Highway 26,
Midhurst, Ontario during regular office hours, Monday to Friday. 8:30 am to 4:30 pm.
DATED AT MIDHURST. ONTARIO this 20th day of FEBRUARY. 2002.
I CERTIFY that a true copy of this notice was mailed or hand delivered to the following persons:
The Owner: GarTY & Sara Janda
The Clerk of the Township of Springwater
The Planner for the Township of Springwater
The Issuer of Building Permits for the Town&hip of Sprlngwater
The Secretary of the Sprlngwater Planning Committee
The Drainage Superintendent of Sprlngwater Township
The Public Works Superintendent of Sprlngwater Township
Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority
Simcoe County Planning Department
Simcoe County District Schoof Board
Simcoe Muskoka Disttict Catholic School Board
Con&eil scotalre publlque du district Centre-$vd-Ove$t
Goosell sealaire due district cathOllque no. 64
Property owners within 60 metres
Townstlip of Oro--Medonte
K. Elaine Caimcross,Secretary
Committee of Adjustment
Telephone: (705)728-4784 EXT. 232
F"ex: (705)728-6957
" _____0__*
~ncl~ l~rH~~~' dH :A8 ~
KEY MAP
~.-.. r)."
J q''<.J
u
. "..- - -.
-----.
'-.D ._ _ _ H _U _.. .. .... ..... ... .
w
....
n
~
r-
""
-
-<
,...
~
- - -_..-.. .".... -----
/" ......
..._~.
_=----.....
......-__._._n.n.....
~Ji...P.l'J . jP' ::"3C,;R'v C'r
01' PAR;:;. BROKEN LOT 65
CONCESSION 1
rORMEIJL'" TOW~~SH:P or ML:JUN1L
Now in the TOWNSHIP OF SPRINGWATER
COU!" r'f '.J' '..>i 'v\:; ~'.:~'.
::~CA~.~ /~)L
~.
o to 20 ~.",.,
$URV[y0P ,J.!: '-'C"1.A~A.. r.'-._s.
1996
!
I
["'"-,,,-,
/l-~L:~:_~- --
......
--"---
...-..-...
...-........---...-.........
..-.-...
""",.../"
.I
/
----..--....
.-.-..~. -...._..,-~.......--..
:!~ ...'5 "/!f-- ..7.::j8.:!:?
f~.-4.l? T
..------..
?
c.
N :.7"s4. I::. \U.668
'\
, , 8.832
N 57'j4' E
/'
;':-.."'i? 7"
INST. ..
,.., 58'OEI'~E--MO)
1~.4'4 (P .. t.h<n)
SSIB
(P .. M...,s
18 (650)
N 58'019'50'"
INST.
PART 4-
_-0.029 hQ.
I ~
I i?
J ~~
I~~
,o..:J.
I~~
I
I
I
I
I
I
INST. 892815
892815
...._.
... -...---.---. -. -..-
9/e 3~Vd
~nd~o:e ~O-O~-83~
~.l.S6ge~.l.SO.l.
~os~e ~3r~3SV' dH :A8 ~N:
[NT aY~ HP LAaEAJ~T ~1!Oj
705?2ee!iJ!:Il;
~~D"~'U~ c;~8~~>
I .....u~ .....I'>..J
'l"KE PUUI_XMG AC'2:
~~
!"'XL. .0.
sq-c;
4.o..v~.,.<L- '()
THa ~OKNSHI. OF 8.~~PGKATS.
The uodere;i.qned hereby app~:l.s to the COUJmittee ot Adjust.ment "for the
ToWn.hip 01: sprinywatw.r under S.cti.Oft "'!5 o'f the pl-.nni.ng A.c:'t. ~O;E' r.1.:le:r. .s
d..cribed in t.hi. applioati.on from ~y-Law WOo taa amGnded).
2.
Name o:f Owner G 01. v- V" V
Addrasa / l nlA.-~"'C y
N~ o'f Agent ('X~ any)
.:j 0\. t--.. J. a.
Lo...~e..
Telephone No. 32.2-1 CL9 7
E It~ uc;- (-e,.
~.
3.
4.
Addres.
Tel~phone NO.
5. NRme a.nd add.re"e of any mortgag..., bol.dere of c:ho.rc:te. or ancUD\b;E'anee.:
/J/A
6. ~ature and e~tent o~ reli.f .pp~ied for:
L lJ -f. J="" V D ,,+~ :J~ ;;l 9 ~ /;L.( J'V\ e-r V' e .1
7. Why i.. it nO~ pO..1bla to comp1y w~th tbo prov~.ion. ot the By-L~w?
P r ""- V 1 (> --..5 r.J 0 '^ "",-.:A. C\.... 'v ;Y' A c{j u....,S -t /'1A ..e."", -t-
8. Legal d..cr1ption ot aubject land. (r.g:l.tered plan number and 10t
number o~ otber 189&1 de.cript~Qn ADA. where app1~c.b1e. etree~ and
..t..r..t number) I
Plan r;'j R -?-t; 56 ( 1 ~+ 6SPo..",-r -r::;
'"
I ~ 13 t- tf 4-,/" <; '-^" () (-<a..- V\. (,2.,
r
9. The app11cant .bal.l attaoh to eaah COpY o~ thi_ .app1..i.ca~i.on a p.lan
ahovin9 the d~n.1on. o~ the eubjeot land. and o~ a~l abu~~i.nq 1.and.
and sbowLn~ the locet~on, ai... And type o~ .1.1 build~nq. and structure.
on the .ub~.c~ and abut~i.n9 1ande. and wbe~. ~equi~ed, by the C~tte.
o~ Adju8~n~. such plan .h.1.~ be signed by an Ontar~o ~And Surveyor.
-----.--.
~ncl~ I~~H~~~' dH :A~ ,
~r:.'" I D T.. nr t-"..at;;,.nw" 1 ... I .. __ ,
. .--.. -......---. ,
- :2 -
Sj-s
10.
Di.mensi.on
o~ land a~f8cteds
~9 _)1-1 m
9 O() -r+
Front.Age
Depth
Are.
wJ.dth ot st.reet
1.1.
particular. of all bui.1dinge and struoture. on
eubj.c~ lande: (Dpacify ground ~locr area, groa8
otoreya, width. len9th, and height, .tc.)
2~/x3~/
or proposed for tbo
~loc~ area, nu~er c~
~;1at.1.n9
Fr<>poa.d
12. ~Dcotion of .11 bU;11dingl!l and etruoture. on or propo..d ~or the eubject
lAnde: (Sp.e~~y dietane.. ~roa .ide, rear and fron~ lot l.1.n..)
Bxisti.ng
Fropo..d
13.
Oat. o~ ACqui.si.ti.on o~ auej.ot lands:
/996
14. D.t. o~ con.truc~ion of .11 bui.lding_ and Btruoturee on eubject lande:
;;2.. 0 0 /
15.
16.
Exiating u.e. o~ subject property'
Exiating u.. of abutting proportJ....
S Q 4 S by\" J€Q ~.... ct...__~ I c... /
It l,
1'. Length o~ ti..e tbe exi.sting n... of the subject property have contJ.nued:
18. Municipal S.rvioee A~ailable: (Check .ppropr.1.ata .pac. or .pacee)
Water
Connect..::!
Sanitary s.",.~.
storm Sew.r.
Connected
19. pr..ant O~~iaLal P1an provi.ione app1ying to tbLe ~andl
20. Preaant ~..trict.d Area By-law (aon.1.ng by-~.w) prQviwiona .pp~yLn9 to
the lancl.'
I2Lf
9/5 30'\1d
~~deo:e ~O-O~-e3~
~L56ge~LsoL
~os~e ~3rij3S'\11 dH :Ae ~N=
NT BY~ HP LA5~R~ET 3'~Oj
{U'::J (,1:10"':) f ;
r~b.J~.U~ ~;~O~~;
f ~'..:.IL.':' ~/_I
(S.i.9n.tur.
,$q ~tr
J
- 3 -
NOT~&
~~ 18 requ!red ~hat this DPP~1cation be f~1ed with the S.Q~.tary-
Trea.ur.r at the, C~ttce of Adjuet.ent ~nd b. aceoapan~.d by a
fe. of $~OO.OO ~n Qaah or by ohegue made payable to tbe Tre~eurer
Q~ the ~own.~~p o~ SprLngw.~.r.
I,
Gee.
~/V'A5
801amnIy d.c1are
Vv-y 0" <A.~C\.
....-
V'- ?+-4!''V'" .in the
that.~
, of the
, Ci) y.. v.. y
Ib ~ J., f I: 'p
of .5:,-""".... c~,'t
of
A11 of the
dec:1.arat1.on
knowing tha"t:
unde:r: oath.
above et.t*=.nt. are tr"_, and I make tbi. .o~emn
conDc~.htiou.ly b.lievin9 it to b. true and
it i. o~ th. DAme force end ofteot .. i~ aadv
DECLARBD B~FORE HE At the
~ JJr.~_"'H/P
of
..."")eJt$!.,/M<:: .L-I1'f/7"L?C.
in the
~.JLf-r' Y
(')...'J () '7'H
d(~.
, ~-'-'''~~L./~<<~;~
of ...:5,o-rl'::'oS" this
day of r~r"LJI9;?,.V
,
Karen Elaine CalmcrO$l. . Comm~IaIOner ete
County of Simcoe, tor the Corporllllon of . <.
the TOWl1Ship of Springwater.
EJ!pires October 4. 2003.
A Commi..ioner etc.
diJ.."
, '.
.; . ""~
I. ,.',
~
j
.r;
(705) 726-47&~
FA'J< (705) 72e-G9:57
SPIUNGWATE.A TOWNSItIlW"
II.1AlNI! CAJRNCH05S
.1I(";aI!TML" TO C:O"UIUTT1llJ QIP "W\nooTl'((\NT
'....NN'IHU . ,,1"ttO"Jo4JIH'1' C:C)t)IU:\'f\lA1-n.
Simcoe Counqr Adm'ftWlntlon Cent<<! 1110 H'W)' :l6
Midnunt. OnlJU'io. Ca:nada LOL lXO' ,
t!D1StJ: .pr1~r@.'~.nc{
'~~r~ I~~U~C~' ~u ~lC I.
:rfi/">,l
~\~ j~
o""",,""..r-f l' !
0/ ~ 0c,,-,-v 13~
1f;.-t'1~1-A 6if C Itu#~ v
,,.
f)....f;,," { 1 ,^ '7 1; /.??1.A2/~La-YvvZJ
!A../ v v'~ U"~ ' ,.r
, J'-"'wV ~~ ~ ~o- .:1:0 ~ ~W- ~
,L:t-..u ~r "'-"<.-V- ~ ,)'.urL{)" . 011' fJ .A-_vJ<<.v ..{.<J b-V 1:
O~,~ /?>vdt/~, . /hId ./7'-t--'-(;~c'v , ~ ~-;;f-' ~~
~~-~ -f-~ J~~ c~. -..Y~!':'~d.,.(Y ,>I'
t:~~. (,(y~, .~(r .c~J &--v~ 4 ~i ~ ,hYi~~ U'-L- ~-e. ~&j
l D rr ". ---~, ...~L\ '-7' cr ~ .
/V:;;~~.T.' ~~~~~~.~:'~:V~; .
~ p, ,~':: /;~ .~~ ;4., fIJ/l1fAJ--~'>4~
~ 0./t-o-~ .lU~~J. ~ +~ 1 7.~ fiLt~ CZ-- ~ct 1l~1~
/C--~~ .A~~ ~ a~.u~~~ ~y; ~ ~
..MJ~'" 11 tftMJ- ~ Jvu~ ~~ h ",,/}~Jill tL/V'-' .J,~' p-u/t.f
~ .h;~:r ;;t;; ~ ~ ;Ii:. ~- .if-.v ~if;:,: -tL fi'~
~ ~ t;L, ~\.. ~ ~ :tt:0 A~v~ ;~~;. t:L .kA/l;~' .~~
cvkv'~r ~0 .~~ .4--)- ~ ~.~ /4 ,';- ~t1 ;
~yO~~,.~Y-J~~.,..-~~ .
J- ~a a~ ~~ -r"" ~ ~'~
-1.A ';
~J1.J/A-~ /r
~~~
-!3kg~
I~ g 1F! (fu) ft/~/ VC{/:"6.
~k J.vO f--. ^ G,o , 5 ~
_________ _______. _.._______________________ ._.__________________________________________________________~~~--j-~rl ~ ^.L-----~------ -
....~-+n~~-AUJ?L~4&iJ.,,~.!.....-- --
... ._ .~___".___.._.___u.___._.___." . ,.. .._..___._......___.._.._.____"_,_. .._"__...___....._.... ....___.._._._._~_,..__._._.. ._._.~___._____________._".__,_..________._.__,_...___.__.____"___._____..+ .__..__________n.__....___._._._.__.w________.._______..__"..n_"n'___'_~__"'
tLuvJ ..
-.--. --_._.._._.._.._-_.__...._---------------~---~---_.~~--}.-----------..-------.-----------------.-------.--.---------------.-..-.-----.
--..-....~Jf~-~L;;;;;L~~-==---==
.=-=1::~~~~~~=~-=~~==...==.
_~A)~-~~.j/~1JL--~--m~--~~---~J~~---------
., , ~~- ( +- ~ViJ-
TI -.-. ----..----.--- -.-.- .l.{,/tl1- -- ,.- ~~--------.-.-------.---.-----.---------.-.-.----..-.-.----....-----.---.. .-...-..- .-.---.----..-------------------..-----.
,\4 >
_____..___..__..___. ~ ~-. __&~N\n 1 -----~ :---~~~~~~~--~-T[--~------~----~-~~~-..~--~~~-~~-~---;~~~~~~-.....~.~~~-~~~~--~-~~---------.-~---~- -:.~~-~--~
~ ...~V1;~;_~.... ~ _____._.91~_~~-m-
,.....-n 1
-.-...-.-- .--.-- .--..--. - - -----a:it\r3-;;:T~----- .-....----.-.----------------.---- -.---..- -- - -.--.--.-.. ---.---.------.-.----- .. .... .-- - ---....-------.---.--.----------------.-.- -. m --.--
X> ~
. ..__.__... _. __._.... .____.\,.~ ._._._____..._._______.n_ ~ _ _.______._.._._____.___.____________..____._..__.________.__m....._______.__.._____._. _._.. _____.__ .....__..__m_._.._____.____.______.._.._____.__
'. ,$) .t\
__.__..___ __.___::-P --w ____._._.____._________________.___.___ ..___________n_____._..__.__ ____.___._____..__m___.__.___m__ . ._. . .___m ____._m.__._.___________._______.__..______.
"~+.___ .____._..__._____._________.... _._.....____._______..__..____.. ....._______..__..._......____..____...___________.__.___..,__,,___'"_"~'u__... __.._....... _.__..._ ,".. .... ___."
"__._.___._u_______,__.+._.________._._...__~.__.__
r.<
,<
:' 'J
'I. t
...,.,/
I.W Szczebior, 279 Line 4 South, Oro
- 3 -
Council's proposed solution of a berm on my property could create even more problems
for me. A better solution would be as above #1, #2:
1) Amend the present official plan and present controls to protect residences and
farms a specific number of feet away (example, within 1200' of an adjacent
border) with buffering/screening guidelines - have it apply to all existing
industries as well as future ones
2) Encourage Duncor and Vandergeest to plant at least two rows of mature
evergreen trees along the south side of Dun cor's recently erected wire mesh
fence continuing along the south border of Vandergeest's property and any
future industrial growth adjoining my borders
3) If the above two are not possible within a reasonable length of time (by the
fall of2002) then I would suggest financial and physical planning and
assistance from Council in planting at least two rows of mature i.e. 7-8'
evergreen trees along the adjacent fence border on my side taking into account
the seedlings already planted there. This may be the most cost effective and
environmentally friendly solution.
Since no other possible solutions relating to the buffering/screening being placed on my
property were considered by me or discussed at the meeting, I would suggest the berm
being built on my property be put on hold for now and two or more rows of mature
evergreen trees be planted along the fence border (between my property and EricAnna)
on my side beside the existing seedlings (40 are left and are about one foot high) with
Oro's assistance.
Of course I would be open to other solutions as they pertain to being placed on my
property to protect my residence and agricultural land from the offending industrial
properties.
Sincerely,
rQ~ - uJ!, d'rr~
"....-/ I~ena- W. (Versha) Szczebior
liws
GOLD MOUNTAIN SPRINGS
Page 1 of 1
Jennifer Zieleniewski
From: Nick McDonald [nick@meridianplan.ca]
Sent: February 20,20028:47 AM
To: ian.beard@township.oro-medonte.on.ca
Cc: cao@township.oro-medonte.on.ca
Subject: GOLD MOUNTAIN SPRINGS
Dear Mayor Beard
Congratulations on the Township's victory with Gold Mountain Springs. Although
I have yet to read the decision, it was probably the right decision in the end.
As you know, I supported the application primarily because the well was already
there and I wanted to find a way to control the water taking.
The only way to get that control, in my opinion, was to approve a plant and enter
into agreements with the owner to provide a mechanism whereby the water
taking could be monitored. I continue to believe that the process would have
given the Township more control over the use. As it stands now, the well is still
there, the trucks continue to roll and the Township has no control. If the well was
not there to start with, I would not have supported the application,
The key, in the future, is to never find ourselves, as a Township, in this situation
again. This means being extra vigilant with water taking applications and making
sure the Township comments on these applications when they are posted for
public review. This process was not available to the Township when Gold
Mountain obtained their initial permit. Staff now carry out this task, ensuring that
Gold Mountain #2 does not happen again.
Talk to you soon.
Nick McDonald
...
~b-/
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK
lREP?RT :0 C~UNCIL
I
.
REPORT NO.: ADM2002-07
PREPARED BY: M. Pennycook, Clerk
DATE: February 27, 2002
SUBJECT: Road Name Change - 5/6 Side road
IBACKGROUND
I
At Committee of the Whole on February 13, 2002, correspondence was received
from the Board of Deacons of Calvary Community Church requesting a name
change to the 5/6 Sideroad. The name suggested for the road is "Calvary Road".
This request was referred to staff for a report.
'ANALYSIS
I
The 5/6 Sideroad is approximately 4.2 km in length from Highway 93 easterly,
crossing the First Line and then turning south to Ridge Road. A map of the road
is attached for information.
In order to rename this road, it would be necessary to advertise the intent to
rename in the newspaper for four consecutive weeks for an approximate cost of
$1000.00. Additionally, signage at Highway 93, First Line and Ridge Road would
have to be changed and the cost borne by the Township.
After canvassing the surrounding municipalities, it was found that the City of
Grillia has a street named "Calverley Street". The Township's Street Naming
Policy states that duplication of street names used in adjacent municipalities shall
be minimized as not to conflict with emergency response addresses.
For the above reasons, it is recommended that the name of the 5/6 Sideroad
remain unchanged.
(RECOMMENDATION
1. That Council receive and adopt this report.
2. That the name of the 5/6 Sideroad remain unchanged.
3. That the Board of Deacons of Calvary Community Church be advised of
Council's decision.
Respectfully submitted,
Marilyn pennycook
Clerk
(;h - r
I
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE [
DATE:
COUNCIL MEETING
[ ]
MOTION NO.
~f\-UJJlJ .
~ :"\JD~
~dflJ
. N
CAL V AR Y COMMUNITY CHURCH
Box 924, Barrie, Ontario. UM 4Y6
January 25,2002
The Corporation of the Township
of Oro-Medonte
148 Line 7 South,
Box 100, Oro, Ontario,
LOL 2XO
Attention: Mr. Paul Marshall- Councillor Ward 3
Dear Paul,
We thank you for .:T1eeting with Pastor Kevin Bushey and myself in November
2001. The discussions with yourself have been most helpful to us in planning the
vision that God has for our local church community. The announcement that the
road will be paved in the summer of 2002, was well received by our church
cong reg ation.
During our meeting with yourself, you mentioned that the re-naming of the road
could be done, should we submit a proposal to the Township. Upon review, we
would like to submit that the name be changed to .. Calvary Road". Please
advise us, as to what steps need to be taken on our behalf, in having the road
name changed.
Again, we thank you for your time and insight, and look forward to hearing from
you on the proposal of changing the road name.
In Christ Service,
~~~
Richard Hartwick
Board of Deacons - Calvary Community Church
Cc Pastor Kevin Bushey - Calvary Community Church
&b~3
G'
~
.
.~
r:/'/
'- ,. /
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
IRE PORT TO COUNCIL I
REPORT NO.:
ADM 2002- /0
PREPARED BY:
Tamara Obee, Assistant Treasurer
DATE:
February 27, 2002
SUBJECT:
Treasurer's Statement of Remuneration - 2001
IBACKGROUND
I
Pursuant to Section 247 (1) of the Municipal Act. R.S.O. 1990, c. MA5, as amended
which states
"Statement by Treasurer. - The treasurer of every municipality shall on or before the 28th of
February in each year submit to the council of the municipality an itemized statement of the remuneration
and expenses paid to each member of council in respect of h is or her services as a member of council or as
an officer of the municipal corporation in the preceding year... .... "
Please find attached the 2001 Statement by the Treasurer.
I RECOMMENDATION
I
1. That this report be received and adopted.
Respectfully submitted,
?;.~
Assistant Treasurer
Attachments
"
~
jCJ31 (jlJ:J
^ \ '()d-
(~~
~
, ..
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
TREASURER'S STATEMENT OF REMUNERATION AND EXPENSES FOR THE YEAR 2001
SALARY MEETING MILEAGE REGISTRATION ACCOMODATIONS MILEAGE TOTAL
FEES ALLOWANCE FEES MEALS,ETC.
COUNCIL
Ian Beard 18,416.70 7,425.00 865.44 522.60 703.65 712.33 28,645.72
Neil Craig 14,386.41 8,215.20 519.30 424.88 1,225.18 677.96 25,448.93
Ralph Hough 10,704.15 5,975.00 346.23 522.60 755.10 871.16 19,174.24
Ruth Fountain 10,704.15 7,800.00 346.23 679.50 614.71 416.02 20,560.61
Paul Marshall 10,704.15 5,731.40 346.23 719.50 779.85 434.29 18,715.42
Walter Dickie 10,704.15 5,250.00 346.23 0.00 666.39 523.23 17,490.00
Harry Hughes 10,704.15 8,100.00 346.23 532.60 717.84 456.88 20,857.70
86,323.86 48,496.60 3,115.89 3,401.68 5,462.72 4,091.87 150,892.62
COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
David Edwards 2,775.00 72.77 2,847.77
Ken Robbins 1,875.00 320.07 2,195.07
Joe Charles 2,325.00 296.48 2,621.48
Allan Johnson 2,775.00 327.49 3,102.49
Albert Pross 2,700.00 613.19 3,313.19
12,450.00 1,630.00 14,080.00
PLANNING ADVISORY COMM.
Donald Bell 585.00 283.01 868.01
H. Robert Barlow 660.00 105.12 765.12'
Fran Sutton 660.00 101.07 761.07
Susan Grant 660.00 113.21 773.21
Peter Wig man 660.00 72.77 732.77
3,225.00 675.18 3,900.18
TRAIL ADVISORY COMM.
Bob Birnie 900.00 130.05 1,030.05
Bruce Duncan 825.00 141.51 966.51
Rosemary Dunsmore 900.00 134.78 1,034.78
Bill Johnston 525.00 94.33 619.33
Debbie Whalen 675.00 72.77 747.77 C"',
3,825.00 573.44 4,398.44
prepared by Tamara Obee February 18, 2002
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
TREASURER'S STATEMENT OF REMUNERATION AND EXPENSES FOR THE YEAR 2001
RECREATION STEERING COMM.
David Knox
Nadeen Morano
Ian Hunter
Catherine Riffer-Wessel
Brian Wiese
prepared by Tamara Obee February 18, 2002
, ~, 'I
750.00
525.00
750.00
750.00
450.00
3,225.00
336.92
89.73
33.69
53.90
40.44
554.68
1,086.92
614.73
783.69
803.90
490.44
3,779.68
"
C'
'"
,
{,
','>'..)
&e-
CORPORA TION OF THE TO'VNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
ROLES & RESPONSIBILITIES FOR VOLUNTEERS
Community HaJJ Boards
Wednesday, February 27, 2002
COMMUNITY HALL BOARD TOWSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
ADMINISTRA TION
1. To manage the operation and 1. To develop and promote the policies
maintenance of the halls on behalf of the and procedures for the safe and efficient
Township. The management of the hall operation of Community Halls, in co-
will be guided by the legislated policies operation with the Hall Boards.
and procedures as established by the
Township.
FINANCIAL
L Individual Halls are responsible for 1. To provide individual community halls
meeting the operating costs associated with with actual expenses and revenues
the running of the halls through the quarterly.
generation of rentals, donations, and
fundraising.
2. To prepare and submit proposed 2. To review with the Community Hall
operating and capital budgets for Boards the proposed operating and capital
presentation to the Township. budget requests and present to CounciL
3. To participate in the forecast of the 3. To advise the Community Halls in their
proposed Five-year Capital Plan and to preparation of the Five-year Capital Plan.
participate in the annual review of the plan.
4. Individual halls are responsible for 4. To encourage the Community Halls to
meeting their operating cost and proposed meet their funding objectives.
funding goals for capital projects.
5. All revenue from rentals, donations and 5. To advise the Community Halls if their
fundraising are to be deposited with the projected revenues are not meeting their
Township. operating expenses.
6. All expenditures incurred with the 6. Ton ensure coding for payment is
operation of the community hall shall be processed in an efficient manner.
handed in to the Township for individual
coding and payment.
7. To provide three(3) quotes to the 7. To oversee the successful completion
Township for each $5,000.00 capital of Capital Projects with Community
project funded by the Hall Board. Funding in co-operation with the
volunteers.
8. To co-ordinate volunteer assistance 8. To develop the necessary documents
where identified in co-operation with the for Capital Projects and to communicate
Township. with the Community Halls the necessary
details.
..
/ f1
(pe-o
9. To provide potential names of 9. To oversee the supervision of the
contractors and service people from the project in co-operation with the volunteers;
community to the Township on capital and to communicate the progress of these
projects over $5,000.00 projects to the Community Hall volunteers.
HALL RENTALS (BOOKINGS)
1. Individual halls will appoint a "booking 1. To review each Community hall's
agent" to ensure public enquiries are "master schedule" and to co-ordinate any
answered in efficient and effective manner. other rentalslbookings as submitted in
To submit to the Township a "master advance to the Township.
schedule" and to continually submit any
other rentalslbookings in advance of the
event.
2. BOOKING AGENT 2. BOOKING AGENT
o To co-ordinate all rentals to ensure that o To advise the Community Hall booking
conflicts in rental requests do not occur agent of all Township policies and
o To follow the Township procedure in procedures that apply to the rental and
completing facility permits forms, management of public halls.
collection of rental fees, damage deposits o To assist the Community Hallslbooking
and conduct the pre and post inspection of agent in the promotion of their halls and
the hall. special events.
o To promote the Community Hall and
community special events.
o To provide Quarterly updates to the
"master schedule"
3. To complete the necessary log and 3. To review all log and permit forms. To
permit forms for all activity in the halls for review annually with the individual halls
submission to the Township. the rental fees to encourage competitive
and fair rates.
MEETINGS
1. To hold a public general meeting, by 1. To advertise the date and time of the
January 31 in the year following the general meeting in the appropriate local
municipal election (held in November) for media; and
the purpose of selecting a chair, secretary, o To prepare the appropriate by-law.
treasurer and directors for each hall and
submit those names to the Township.
2. To schedule and hold Community Hall 2. To attend meetings as required.
meetings when required and to post the
minutes of meeting in the Hall.
MAINTENANCE
1. To provide ongoing custodial care as 1. To establish a housekeeping schedule
required, according to Township standards, in co-operation with the community hall
to ensure the halls are safe and clean for boards that meets the Township standards
public use. for the care and maintenance of public
o Custodial care includes: sweeping, buildings.
washing & waxing floor surfaces,
disinfecting washroom and kitchen
#"
/
G,e
r;\
~,J
facilities, washing windows and removal of
garbage.
2. To record inspections as stipulated in 2. To provide the necessary fire inspection
the Ontario Fire Code and to inform the sheets for the halls and to notify the
Township of any deficiencies, including Township's Fire Chief and any
daily and monthly inspections of fire deficiencies; and further, to co-ordinate to
extinguishers, exits, exit lights, back-up work to ensure that the fire inspection
and emergency lighting. deficiencies are satisfied.
3. To co-operate with the Township in the 3. To co-ordinate the annual building and
conducting of annual fire and building fire code inspections and to complete all
inspections. necessary work with regard to any
deficiencies identified.
4. To organize and annual "cleaning bee" 4. To ensure that all safety procedures are
for the Community Ha11 and property fo11owed during "cleaning bees".
(community volunteers can be utilized).
5. To inspect annual1y hall furnishings to 5. To review concerns with Community
ensure public safety and to notify the HaIls and adjust the Five-year Capital
township of any concerns. Plans if required.
6. To participate in WHMIS, First Aid 6. To co-ordinate when necessary the
and other training programs when provided training and re-certification for Community
by the Township. Hall volunteers in order that they may
perform their duties in a safe manner.
Training may include WHMIS, First Aid,
Fire Extinguisher, etc.
8. To perform all maintenance and service 8. To provide copies of all pertinent
tasks according to Health and Safety Health & Safety Regulations and Township
Regulations and Township standards. Standards to all community halls.
...
/ J I
v .{-- .r..
, ,
Township of Oro-Medonte
Public Meeting
Thursday, February 21, 2002
7:00 p.m.
Parkland Secondary Study
Present:
Mayor Ian Beard
Deputy Mayor Neil Craig
Councillor Paul Marshall
Councillor Harry Hughes
Councillor Ruth Fountain
Staff Present:
Jennifer Zieleniewski, CAO
Marilyn Pennycook, Clerk
Chris Carter, Recreation Coordinator
Joe Casey, Deputy Fire Chief
Also Present:
D. Knox, Rec. Advisory Committee
Julie Scott, Innovative Perspectives
Wilf McMechan, Steffie Steinke, C. Hughes, Glen
Taber, Ray Collins, Brenda Collins, Linda Northcott,
Howie Rogers
Mayor Beard called the meeting to order.
Julie Scott presented a summary of the Parkland Study Recommendations
as prepared in the January 23, 2002 draft "Township of Oro-Medonte Parkland -
Secondary Study".
Written submissions were received from:
Councillor Harry Hughes
Doug Wilson
Glen Taber, Horseshoe Valley Property Owners Assoc.
..
/' ,...,
, I'
I I /)
l..or-c/-.
The following is a summary of the verbal comments from the meeting:
· Concerns re parkland as "natural areas", and monitoring of
parkland maintenance.
· Concerns re retention of waterfront parkland
· Designation of parkland type requires public consultation, consistency of
application, usage changes
· Current access to Copeland Forest through private property needs to be
addressed, possibly through signage
· Development of parkland in residential areas and close to schools for use
by children
After no further comments or questions, the Mayor adjourned the meeting at
8:30 p.m.
A tape of the meeting is available in the Clerk's office.
REPORT
!
i
~. i
!
DEPT. REPORT TO: Council PREPARED BY:
#ES2002-G7 Keith Mathieson
SUBJECT & FilE #: DEPARTMENT:
COUNCil:
Draft "Water and Sediment Public Works
Survey of Bass lake" -
C. OF W. Prepared by Mr. Keith
Sherman, Co-Ordinator of the
MOTION #: Severn Sound Environmental DATE:
Association
DATE: February 22, 2002
During the winter of 2000, a number of meetings were held with the Honourable Mr. Garfield Dunlop,
M.P.P.; Members of Township Council; Township staff; Mr. Keith Sherman, Severn Sound
Environmental Association; M.N.R. staff; and Mr. Doug Herbert, Bass Lake Property Owners'
Association, with regards to improving the water quality of Bass Lake.
Mr. Herbert and his Association presented two (2) proposals at these meetings to remove sediment
from Bass Lake, which would be funded through private fundraising and possible Provincial grants.
From these meetings, it was felt that core samples should be taken from the bottom of Bass Lake to
analyze the concentration of phosphorous sediments of Bass Lake during the winter of 2001, prior to
dredging or aeration of the lake. This work was co-ordinated by Mr. Keith Sherman of Severn Sound
Environmental Association and Mr. Doug Herbert, Director, Bass Lake Ratepayers' Association, and
funded by the Township of Oro-Medonte.
Mr. Sherman has provided a draft Report entitled, "A Water and Sediment Survey of Bass Lake"
dated January 16, 2002, which is attached for Council perusal.
Under "Results and Discussion" (pages 5 and 6), Mr. Sherman is suggesting that the proposal to
dredge or aerate the lake would result in the degrading of the water quality of Bass Lake.
Mr. Sherman's conclusions and recommendations are outlined on page ten (10) of the Report. The
financial implications to the Township of Mr. Sherman's recommendations would be the cost of the
open water quality sampling in five (5) years to be considered during the appropriate Budget
deliberations. )
Mr. Sherman will be attending the Regular Committee of the Whole Meeting on February 27,2002 to
answer any questions that Council may have with regards to this Report.
-1- q ~'J/
1. THAT the Township of Oro-Medonte continues to work with Severn Sound Environmental
Association and the Bass Lake Property Owners' Association to support the recommendations of
this Report.
2. THAT Mr. Doug Herbert be notified of Council's decision.
3. THAT Council receives this report.
Respectfully submitted,
c6L
Keith Mathieson
../\<1\ ~)' 'l
.~b
CAU d-
CJ~
./\
~ ,.?"'" ,"
V,..l:-.
-1 -
.
..
[draft Jan. 16,2002]
A Water and Sediment Survey of Bass Lake,
Township of Oro- Medonte
-'''''--~
"-
.',
January 2002
"
.-....."":i
-.,'
.:t,:
Prepared by:
K. Sherman, Coordinator '"
Severn Sound Environmental Association
For
Township of Oro-Medonte
. L\
J~(\'
\
Foreword
This document reports on technical investigations conducted in Bass Lake during 2001 by Severn
Sound Environmental Association for the Township ofOro-Medonte.
The report received technical review prior to its publication. This does not necessarily signifY that
the contents reflect the views and policies of the municipality supporting the work, nor does
mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for
use.
For additional copies of this report or infonnation on the SSEA, please contact the Severn Sound
Environmental Association Office.
Severn Sound Environmental Association
c/o The Wye Marsh Wildlife Centre
P.O. Box 100
Midland, Ontario
L4R 4K6
Phone: (705) 526-7809
Table of Contents
A CKN"OWLEDGEMENTS .. .............. ..... .... ............. ...... ...... .................... .....j
List of Tables............ ....... ...... ........... .... .......... .... ....... ......... ................ ...............ii
List of Figures.......... ............... ......... ....... ................... ....:,..... ..... ..... ...... .., ... ..... ..iii
L. f d. ...
1st 0 Appen Ices... ............... .................. ......... .............. ........ ....................... .111
SUlVIMARY ........ .... .... .................... ..... ....... ....... .... ............. ......... ..,. ...... ... ..... ..iv
INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................1
BASS LAKE AREA .................................... ........... ...................... ............ .......1
MEl'BODS ......... ............ ...... ............ ........... .......... ............ ............ ... ............ ...2
Sediment sampling 2001 ........... ........ ..................... .......... ...... .... ....... ...2
Open Water Quality 2001 ... ................ ....... ........................... ..............2
Trophic status model approach ..... .............. ......... ..... .............. ...... ......3
Data Sources .........................................................................................3
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ......... .......... ......... ... ......... ... ............ ............ ....5
Sediment sampling .... ....... ......... ... .... .................... .... .................... ........5
Water Quality.......................... ............................................................. 6
Phytoplankton and zooplankton...... .... ......... ................................ .......7
Mod el results ......................................................................................... 8
Lake mana2ement actions - phosphorus contro1..................................8
Lake management actions - in-lake management techniques.............lO
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ..........................................10
REFERENCES ................................................................................................11
/
1 ..
.//1 """)
- t~i~~ /-v4
~
~
"
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I
)\/V~
x'-~
Funding support of the Township ofOro-Medonte for the survey is gratefully acknowledged. Murray
Charlton and Jackie Milne ofEnvlronment Canada's National Water Research Institute, Burlington,
Ontario, provlded sampling and analytical support for the sediment core samples and winter water
quality sampling. The Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Environmental Monitoring and
Reporting Branch and the Laboratories Branch provlded water quality and phytoplankton analyses.
Zooplankton analyses were carried out by Sue Standke. Keith Matheson, the Manager of Public
Works for the Township of Oro-Medonte provided valuable advlce and support throughout the
survey.
Special thanks to Doug Herbert, Director, Bass Lake Ratepayers Association for arranging the
sampling boat, assisting with field sampling and for providing valuable background information and
support through the survey.
Sean Miller, Water Scientist, SSEA conducted most of the open water field work for the survey and
assisted with data analyses. Lex McPhail, SSEA Applications Specialist, and Maggie??? provided
graphic support and assisted with data analyses for this report.
Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
Table 4
Table 5
/1,
;{ x
j\ {~
~~,,~,
.~
List of Tables
Mean surficial sediment quality of Bass Lake with comparison to Sediment Quality
Guidelines
Trophic indicators of Bass Lake from 1975 to 2001
Basic chemistry of Bass Lake 1980 to 1996
Total phosphorus supply to Bass Lake
Measured and predicted total phosphorus for Bass Lake
J
11
,
.
j
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
List of Figures
d
A t~"
" \0, ' ~.
Bass Lake and watershed area
Bass Lake sampling locations
Vertical profiles of temperature and dissolved oxygen at two sites in Bass Lake on
March 6,2001
Loss on Igriltion (%) and sediment pore water ammonia concentration (mgIL) in core
sections at five stations in Bass Lake
Total phosphorus (mglkg) in core sections at four stations in Bass Lake
Metals (mglkg) in core sections at four stations in Bass Lake a) Cd, b) Pb, c) Cr, d)
Ni, e) Zn, t) Fe.
Temperature and dissolved oxygen at 1 m off bottom at station BL from May 15 to
October 2,2001
Secchi disk visibility (m) and chlorophyll ~ concentration (ugIL) at Station BL from
May 15 to October 2, 2001
Total phosphorus and ammonia in the euphotic zone and at 1 m off bottom at station
BL from May 15 to October 2, 2001
Seasonal zooplankton biomass in Bass Lake from May 15 to October 2,2001
List of Appendices
Appendix 1 Open water quality data for station BL
Appendix 2 List of phytoplankton genera found in Bass Lake in 1996 and 2001
Appendix 3 List of zooplankton species found in Bass Lake in 1996 and 2001
Appendix 4 List of aquatic macrophytes found in Bass Lake in 2001
Appendix 5 Trophic Status Model for Bass Lake
111
SUMMARY
Concerns with the water quality of Bass Lake included the effects of nutrient enrichment on Bass
Lake such as nuisance algae growths and poor oxygen conditions in the bottom waters of the lake
that could adversely affect fish and other aquatic life. Further, the low bottom water oxygen
conditions monitored in 1996 (Gernza and Aubrey 1999) could lead to. an increase in the net release
of sediment bound nutrients into the water column. Although the water quality conditions of Bass
Lake have been monitored since the 1970's, the sensitivity of Bass Lake to nutrient inputs and the
impact of in-lake management actions such as dredging lake sediments on the Lake have not been
examined. This report will describe the sediment and water quality conditions in Bass Lake,
Township ofOro-Medonte, in relation to nutrient sources.
Bass Lake is located at the headwaters of the North River in the Severn Sound watershed and is
situated on the edge ofthe Oro Moraine. The Lake has a surface area of5.49 km2, a volume of18.8
million m3, mean depth of3.4 m and a maximum depth of8.5 m. The lake has a drainage area of
40.88 km2. The area receives recreational use including cottages, trailer parks, swimming, boating
and fishing.
Sediment and water sampling took place on March 6,2001 through the ice at four locations and at
an additional site on November 22, 2001. Sediment cores were sectioned into 2-cm sections :from
o to 10 cmdepth and then in 5-cm sections ftom 10 em to the bottom of the core (as deep as 75 cm).
A deeper layer of elevated organic matter (LOI) and elevated ammonia in sediment pore waters was
found below a moderately enriched layer (30 em thick) just below the sediment surface, indicating
that recent sediment deposition was relatively cleaner as compared to sediment deposited during past.
The deeper layer may result from past logging activities in the Lake basin. Metal values for Bass
Lake sediments were below or slightly above the lowest effect level (LEL) of the Sediment Quality
Guidelines indicating sediment that has quality typical for the relatively clean sediment in the area.
There is no indication that additional bioassessment of the sediment in Bass Lake is required if left
intact.
Open water quality was monitored bi-weekly from May 15 to October 2 at the deepest point in the
lake, site BL. Water clarity was measured using the Secchi disk visibility. Profiles of dissolved
oxygen, temperature and conductivity were collected along with samples of nutrients, chlorophyll a,
phytoplankton and zooplankton.
Secchi disk visibility was improved over historical values from typical mean values of2 m to 3.8 m
in 2001. The improvement may relate to the infestation of the exotic zebra mussel in recent years.
A temperature gradient was apparent occasionally through the summer but was apparently broken
down by wind and wave action between sampling runs allowing the deep bottom waters to be
reaerated from above. The dissolved oxygen in the bottom waters fluctuated through the sunnner
and reached a minimum of2 mgIL The lack of hydrogen sulphide odour (the rotten egg smell) in
the bottom water samples through 2001 suggesting that the bottom waters were sufficiently
oxygenated to prevent anaerobic conditions and the build up of phosphorus or ammonia from the
iv
\.
..
,()j
A h,...J
./\0'\
y"
\
sediments. If the sediments were polluted with excessive organic matter and high concentrations of
mtrogen and phosphorus, an accumulation of nutrients in the bottom waters overlying the sediment
would be expected as well as much higher phosphorus and mtrogen concentrations in the surficial
sediment. However, the findings in this survey suggest that this is not the case in Bass Lake. There
is little accumulation of ammonia or phosphorus in the bottom waters overlying the sediment in
winter or in summer when bottom water dissolved oxygen reaches a minimum concentration and
relatively low concentrations of phosphorus in the sediments of Bass Lake.
Based on Secchi disk visibility, phosphorus concentration and chloropyll a concentration, Bass Lake
was considered meso trophic or moderately enriched. The Ontario Trophic Status Model was used
to predict existing conditions and to examine the sensitivity of the Lake to changes in phosphorus
input, Bass Lake is sensitive to nutrient enrichment based on expected changes to the watershed
and based on the potential for extended anoxic conditions in the bottom waters that will promote
release of nutrients from the deep water sediments. With a concerted effort to control sources of
phosphorus to the lake, it is possible to reverse some of the effects of historical loadings on the lake
and prevent further deterioration. The lake trophic status and the sensitivity of the lake to changes
in loadings do not appear to warrant such drastic action as lake sediment dredging. The sediment
measurement of this survey confirm that organic matter and phosphorus concentrations in surficial
sediment are not polluted and should be left intact.
v
I ' '
e-:: ,,,- f f
INTRODUCTION
The Township ofOro- Medonte was approached by the Bass Lake Ratepayers Association concerning
water quality concerns with the Lake and proposed large scale in-lake management techniques such
as dredging mud from the lake bed as a possible option for improving lake quality. The Severn Sound
Environmental Association was contracted by the Township to conduct a survey ofthe lake sediment
and water quality conditions and to make recommendations on management action.
Concerns with the water quality of Bass Lake included the effects of nutrient enrichment on Bass
Lake such as nuisance algae growths and poor oxygen conditions in the bottom waters of the lake
that could adversely affect fish and other aquatic life, Further, the low bottom water oxygen
conditions monitored in 1996 (Gernza and Aubrey 1999) could lead to an increase in the net release
of sediment bound nutrients into the water column. Although the water quality conditions of Bass
Lake have been monitored since the 1970's, the sensitivity of Bass Lake to nutrient inputs and the
impact of in-lake management actions such as dredging lake sediments on the Lake have not been
examined. This report will descn"be the sediment and water quality conditions in Bass Lake,
Township ofOro-Medonte, in relation to nutrient sources.
The purposes of this report are to:
1. describe the water quality conditions in 2001 in comparison with historical water quality
conditions
2. estimate the relative sources of phosphorus and predict the open water phosphorus
concentrations
3. descn"be the relative sensitivity of the Lake to phosphorus supply and recommend a
phosphorus control strategy
4. measure sediment quality in order to assess proposed in-lake management techniques for
improving Bass Lake water quality.
This document does not deal with protection and enhancement of nearshore habitat and bathing
quality. However, these important aspects of environmental quality will benefit from a better
understanding of the open water quality status and sensitivity of the Lake.
BASS LAKE AREA
Bass Lake is located at the headwaters of the North River in the Severn Sound watershed and is
situated on the edge of the Oro Moraine. The Lake has a surface area of 5.49 km2, a volume of 18.8
million m3, mean depth of 3.4 m and a maximum depth of 8.5 ill. The lake has a drainage area of
40.88 km2 (Figure 1).
The area is underlain by limestone bedrock and has an overburden geology dominated. by glacial
outwash and sands and gravel of the Oro Moraine. The soils are well drained in upland areas of the
watershed. Poorly drained muck soils associated with historical or existing wetland areas are located
west, south and downstream of the Lake,
1
..
~
,
~
/l.~ ..
"-"'''''-
"!it
r'i,
;"l
.~ i/
The area receives recreational use including cottages, trailer parks, swimming, boating and fishing.
The immediate shoreline of the Lake has 212 permanent and seasonal shoreline dwellings that are
serviced by individual private sewage systems. Big Cedar Estates is a year-round trailer park located
at the Southwest end of the Lake with up to 230 trailer homes serviced by a communal spray
irrigation sewage system. Bass Lake Provincial Park is a recreational park located on the south side
of the Lake with approximately 250 summer only camp sites. The Provincial Park has a septic tank
pit system with liquids discharged to holding lagoons. Solids are hauled from the system by licenced
haulers out of the watershed (Figure 2).
A municipally owned beach is located at the eastern end of the Lake. The Provincial Park has an
organized beach along the south shore. Swimming also occurs at a road allowance on the south side
of the Lake at the Concession 13 road allowance.
There is an extensive provincially significant wetland located at the western end of the Lake and
another wetland immediately south of the Lake.
METHODS
Sediment sampJing 2001
Sediment and water sampling took place on March 6,2001 through the ice and an additional site was
sampled on November 22,2001. Sediment core samples were obtained at five locations from the
deep area of the lake in order to compare sediment and pore water quality (pore water is the water
that occupies the spaces between the sediment particles) in the deeper lake bed subject to low oxygen
conditions (between the deepest point, 8.5 m up to depths of 5 m). Sampling locations are shown
on Figure 2. Samples were collected using a modified benthos corer. Cores were sectioned into 2-
em sections from 0 to 10 cm depth and then in 5-cm sections ftom 10 cm to the bottom of the core
(as deep as 75 em). At the main lake station (BL) the cores taken were sectioned in 2-cm sections
to the bottom of the core obtained.
Core sections were centrifuged to separate the water ftom the solids for analysis of ammonia in
interstitial water, Duplicate sections were analyzed for loss on ignition (LOI, a measure of organic
content of the sediment), total phosphorus and metals. Sampling support, water and sediment
analyses were provided by staff of Environment Canada's National Water Research Institute.
Water Quality
On March 6, 2001 and on November 22,2001, the water column was sampled to within a meter off
bottom using a Hydrolab Pro:fi1er for temperature, dissolved oxygen, conductivity and pH. Water
samples ftom one meter depth and within one meter off bottom (5 m) were collected on March 6,
2001 using a van Dorn bottle and analysed for nutrients (total phosphorus, soluble phosphate,
ammonia., nitrate).
2
...""~,
";",d;
Open water quality was monitored bi-weekly from May 15 to October 2 at the deepest point in the
lake, site BL. During each sample run a euphotic zone composite sample (2 times the Secchi disc
measurement) and a grab sample using a van Dorn Bottle at 1 m ofIbottom were collected. Water
samples were tested for chlorophyll ~ (only in composite sample), total phosphorus, soluble reactive
phosphorus or phosphate, ammonia, total Kjeldahl nitrogen and nitrate. Analyses of water samples
were carried out at the Ministry of the Environment using standard analytical methods. In addition,
a separate composite sample was collected for identification and estimation of phytoplankton
biovolume. Vertical profiJes of temperature and dissolved oxygen and conductivity were obtained
using a YSI model 50 dissolved oxygen meter and a YSI model 3000 TLC conductivity meter.
Zooplankton were collected using a conical plankton net towed vertically through the water column
from the bottom to the surface. Zooplankton samples were preserved and sent to a contractor (Sue
Stanke) for identification, enumeration and estimation of biomass. The method used for zooplankton
was similar to that used by Gernza and Aubrey (1999).
Trophic status model approach
The Ontario Trophic Status Model (TSM, Dillon, et al. 1986 ) was used to predict existing
conditions and to examine the sensitivity of the Lake to changes in phosphorus input. The TSM was
developed for small, stratified, Precambrian Shield lakes. The model equates the change in
phosphorus concentration in a lake over time with the phosphorus input per unit lake volume minus
the phosphorus loss through sedimentation and outflow (Dillon et aL 1986; Hutchinson et al. 1991).
Hutchinson et al. (1991) indicate that use of the TSM for areas outside the geographic area for which
it was developed can be made, provided measurement and validation of phosphorus export figures
and phosphorus retention coefficient are achieved. The model has been adapted for use in Severn
Sound through the use of direct measurements and estimates of local phosphorus loads and
comparison of measured quality with predicted quality (Sherman and Brown 1995). The model data
sources were augmented with infonnation collected in the area through the Severn Sound
Environmental Association Office. The TSM model recognizes two conditions that affect phosphorus
retention in a lake.
1. where bottom water dissolved oxygen is not depleted - the oxic condition
2. where bottom water dissolved oxygen is depleted to at or near 0.0 mg 02/L - the anoxic
condition.
Either of these conditions could apply to Bass Lake depending on the severity of oxygen depletion
in the deeper area of the Lake. Predicted total phosphorus was evaluated using both conditions.
3
.
.
'!
/~JV\
Data Sources
Open water quality
Open water quality was sampled during the ice-free period from 1973 to 2001. Most of the
measurements were taken by cottagers through the Ministry of the Environment (MaE) Self Help
Program. More comprehensive sampling was carried out during a study by the University ofT oronto
(Zimmennan et al. 1983) from 1978 to 1980. The Ministry of the Environment sampled the Lake in
1996 (Gernza and Aubrey, 1999). Members of the Bass Lake Cottage Association have been
involved in the MOE Lake Partner Program since 1996. Lake Partner Program data from 1998, 1999
and 2000 were available for total phosphorus and Secchi disc visibility in Bass Lake. The 2001 water
quality survey data from this study was also induded in the modelling analysis.
Precipitation and atmospheric phosphorus supply
Long-term average precipitation from the Atmospheric Environment Service station at Orillia was
used. Long-term average evaporation was obtained using Dillon et al. (1986). A long-term bulk.
deposition value of20.7 mg/m2.year was used for total phosphorus loading from the atmosphere to
the Lake surface (:from Dillon et al. 1993).
Morphometric and Hydrologic information
The drainage basin for Bass Lake was delineated using:MNR OBM 1:10,000 topographic maps
supplemented with air photo interpretation of the drainage divide by Severn Sound Environmental
Association GIS staff. Long-term flow data from the North lliver station (02ED024) was available
:trom 1989 to 2000. The mean daily flow was converted to a runoff value of 0.331 m/y. The surface
inflows are generally associated with the wetland areas to the west and south of the lake. The upland
to the south ofthe Lake is part of the Oro Moraine, a source of ground water recharge/discharge to
the lake.
Shoreline Development and Watershed land use
Shoreline development was obtained from the TO"WI1Ship ofOro-Medonte Property Assessment data
and through interviews with the Trailer Park staff and Provincial Park staff. Changes in land use of
the watershed were examined in a series of air photos from the Ministry ofNatural Resources (1953,
1971, 1989, 1998). All shoreline properties were grouped as seasonal residential units, residential
units (assumed permanent), vacant registered lots and camp ground units or trailer units (Appendix
5).
Analysis of historical air photos for the Bass Lake watershed indicated that the proportion offorest
cover in the watershed has changed very little. This is because planting of trees has offset removal
offorest cover. Cultivated fann land and pasture have been reduced since 1953 and replaced with
urban or estate residential type development, especially north east of the lake. Changes in shoreline
4
. .....
I)-
,,,, t
development appear to be slow. However, the conversion of older cottage style dwellings to
pennanent dwellings and increases in water use have increased the impact that shoreline dwellings
can have on the lake.
Based on measurements and estimates of total phosphorus loads from various land uses in the Severn
Sound area ( Severn Sound RAP 1993, SSRAP unpublished), unit total phosphorus export values
(kglkm2.yr) were applied to various land uses in the Bass Lake watershed to estimate the watershed
sources of total phosphorus to the Lake.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Sediment Quality
Loss on ignition (LOI) values were relatively low in the first 30 em of sediment and increased in the
deeper sections, indicating a deeper layer of higher organic content below the depth that would
influence the water column of the Lake (Figure 3a-d). The longest core was 75 em and extended
into clay at the bottom indicating that the mud deposits in Bass Lake had a thickness of approximately
75 em. The deeper layer ofhigher LOI may be due to organic matter deposited during the period of
intensive logging of the Bass Lake watershed (date???).
Ammonia values in the sediment pore water (the water in the spaces between the sediment particles)
ranged from 0.6 to 5 mgIL in the top 10 cmofsediment (2-cmseetions) and increased below or 5-cm
sections from 0 to 30 em below the sediment surface and within 30 em below the sediment surface.
In four ofthe five cores the ammonia concentrations increased to values up to 11 mgIL in the more
organic layer deeper in the sediment (Figure). The water samples from above bottom had ammonia
concentrations less than 0.005 mgIL. Ammonia was measured in the sediment pore water at
concentrations 100 times higher than in the overlying water column. The concentration was even
higher in the deeper sediments. It would appear that release of this ammonia to the overlying lake
water is insufficient to cause ammonia accumulation in the bottom waters. Total phosphorus in the
sediment was relatively low at the sediment surface and generally decreased with depth indicating
relatively low phosphorus content.
Table 1 shows the mean values of metals found in the top four em of sediment from four locations
in the Lake as compared to the Provincial Sediment Quality Guidelines. For comparison, median
sediment metal concentrations found by the Geological Survey of Canada in a large number oflake
sediment samples from the region and mean values for Penetang Bay. Metal concentrations for Bass
Lake sediments were below or slightly above the lowest effect level (LEL) of the Sediment Quality
Guidelines indicating sediment that has quality typical for the relatively clean sediment in the area.
There is no indication that additional bioassessment of the sediment in Bass Lake is required ifleft
intact.
5
.
.
\u
/'\4/
If the sediments were polluted with excessive organic matter and high concentrations of nitrogen and
phosphorus, an accumulation of nutrients in the bottom waters overlying the sediment would be
expected as well as much higher phosphorus and nitrogen concentrations in the surficial sediment.
However, the findings in this survey suggest that this is not the case in Bass Lake. There is little
accumulation of ammonia or phosphorus in the bottom waters overlying the sediment in wiilter or
in summer when bottom water dissolved oxygen reaches a minimum concentration and relatively low
concentrations of phosphorus in the sediments of Bass Lake. The elevated ammonia concentrations
in the sediment pore water suggest that if the sediment were extensively disturbed, as would happen
with deep water dredging, or if the deeper bottom waters experienced complete oxygen depletion
then Bass Lake water quality would be degraded through the increased release of nutrients. Bass
Lake should be considered very sensitive to any extensive deep water dredging project. It should also
be considered sensitive to any additional sources of organic matter or nutrients that could lead to
increased oxygen depletion ofthe bottom waters ofthe lake. In addition disturbance of the sediment
could release elevated concentrations of ammonia that could be toxic to fish.
Water Quality
During winter the water is colder near the ice cover and warmer with depth. Dissolved oxygen
decreased with depth to just over 2 mg/L (Figure 3). No detectable odour of hydrogen sulphide (the
rotten egg smell) was detected in the bottom water samples suggesting that the bottom waters were
sufficiently oxygenated to prevent a build up of products of anaerobic decomposition such as
ammonia. There was no difference between the total phosphorus, dissolved reactive phosphorus or
ammonia concentrations at 1m depth in the water column compared to 1 m offbottom confinning
that a build up of nutrients was not taking place in the water column near the sediment (Appendix 1).
Temperature pro:fi]es taken from spring through to fall of2001 showed that Bass Lake was partially
stratified. Gernza and Aubry (1999) also reported partial thermal stratification or layering in the
bottom waters of the Lake. The significant change in temperature in 1996 and 2001 started at
approximately 5 m and was occasionally accompanied by decreased oxygen concentration in the
bottom waters that varied through the late spring to summer. A similar oxygen depletion was noted
in the measurements made in 1978-1980 (Zimmerman et al. 1983). The depletion occurs below 7
. m to the deepest point of8.5 to 9 m and represents a s~ proportion of the total area of the lake
of about one m thickness. A zone of rapid teD1perature decline, or a thermocline, was set up
occasional in the deep basin of the Lake but was apparently broken down by wind and wave action
between sampling runs causing the bottom waters to be reaerated from above. The dissolved oxygen
in the bottom waters fluctuated and reached a minimum of 2.1 mg/L on August 7, 2001 while a
minimum of 0.2 mgIL reached on August 6, 1996 (Gernza and Aubrey 1999). The lack ofhydrogen
sulphide odour (the rotten egg smell) in the bottom water samples through 2001 suggesting that the
bottom waters were sufficiently oxygenated to preyent 'anaerobic conditions and the build up of
phosphorus or ammonia :from the sediments.
Water clarity as indicated by Secchi disk visibility was improved in 2001 over historical values (Table
6
A ; ~ f.
../j ~-
t~~ " ,
2, Figure 8). The improvement may relate to the infestation of the exotic zebra mussel, Dreissena
polymorpha, in Bass Lake that apparently started in 1997. The improvement in clarity may explain
the improvement in bottom water dissolved oxygen concentration since 1996 or earlier. Algae
density, as indicated by chlorophyll ~ concentration, was at similar levels to historical values (Table
2, Figure 8).
Total phosphorus and ammonia concentrations in the bottom waters were similar to euphotic zone
composites in the 2001 survey. No accumulation oftotal phosphorus, phosphate or ammonia was
noted. This is in contrast to Gernza and Aubry (1999) who noted elevated total phosphorus and
ammonia in the bottom waters ( 1 m off bottom) compared to the euphotic zone samples for 1996.
A comparison of basic water chemistry between 1978-80 and 1996 is presented in Table 3. The
basic chemistry of the lake has changed very little over the 16-year period with slight increases in
sodium and chlorides concentration and a slight decreases in sulphate concentration. Mean
conductivity has not changed appreciably since 1978.
Based on bottom water dissolved oxygen concentration, total phosphorus concentration, chlorophyll
~ concentration and Secchi disc visibility over the period 1973 to 2001, the lake can be considered
meso trophic or moderately enriched. The apparent increase in total phosphorus in 1996 may have
been due to one anomalous value that influenced the seasonal mean. Secchi disk visibility appears
to be increasing in recent years. The introduction of zebra mussels to the lake (noted in 1997) has
likely contn"buted to an increase in water clarity following a long period of relatively stable average
clarity between 1973 and 1996 (average Secchi disc visibility 2.1 m 1973-1996). The water quality
status of Bass Lake as of2001 is considered moderately enriched. The bottom water conditions
indicate sensitivity to additional input of organic matter or phosphorus.
Phytovlankton and zoovlankton
[phytoplankton will be added when results are received in March, 2002]
The average density and biomass of zooplankton over the open water survey was 26,782
organisms/m3 and 52.2 mglm3 respectively. The zooplankton community density in the open lake
was dominated by the cladoceran Daphnia retrocurva and the calanoid copepod Leptodiaptomus
ashlandii. These tiny ''water fleas"eat algae and other small particles in the water column. Their
presence in the lake is an indication of relatively good water quality. Another significant organism
found in the zooplankton samples (but not included in the above mentioned density and biomass) was'
the veliger larvae (the free swimming stage) of the exotic zebra mussel Dreissena polymorpha an
introduced pest to Ontario from Europe. Z~bra mussels were apparently introduced into the lake in
1997 and have become distn"buted throughout the lake, especially on hard surfaces, on other native
mussels and clams and rooted aquatic plants in the nearshore. The average zebra mussel density and
biomass was 13,356 veligers/m3 and 3.8 mg/m3 in 2001 with peak values in the spring and early
summer.
.
7
, .
I
A l<b
/~/I
The seasonal pattern of density and biomass was compared to results for 1996 (prior to any zebra
mussel infestation). Mean biomass for the open water period was similar but the seasonal distiibution
of biomass indicated depressed values during the spring and early summer when zebra mussel veliger
larvae are at their peak, The infestation of this pest may be adversely influencing the large bodied
zooplankton populations which depend on particles (algae and bacteria) in the open waters.
M ode) results
The TSM was used to predict total phosphorus concentration in the lake under existing conditions
in order to assess the predicted quality against measured. The recent measured total phosphorus
concentrations ranged between 11 and 18 ug/L. The model predicted a total phosphorus
concentration of16 ug/L which compared well with the measured results, It should be noted that the
model more closely predicted measured total phosphorus when used in an oxic mode (as opposed to
anoxic) for phosphorus retention (see App~ndix 5).
Other factors will affect the relatively simple prediction of quality in Bass Lake following any
phosphorus control actions. The model and predictions have not been adjusted for the effect of zebra
mussels on water clarity and total phosphorus. Evidence from other areas of the Great Lakes and
inland waters suggests that a shift in the phosphorus - open water algae relationship should be
expected in Bass Lake. Water clarity has already improved since the infestation with zebra mussels
began in Bass Lake. The low bottom water oxygen conditions may benefit from the increased water
clarity as sunlight will probably start to penetrate to the deepest areas of the Lake and promote
oxygen production deeper in the water column.
The lake bottom waters do not appear to contn1mte any serious increase in loading to the Lake as
of2001. Increasing water levels due to a lack of control at the outlet dam may adversely affect lake
quality by increasing bottom water oxygen depletion problems that may result in an increased release
of phosphorus in future. The water level control at the dam should be investigated further with the
Ministry of Natural Resources to detennine if lake levels can be stabilized or reduced slightly to
promote natural mixing of the water column into bottom waters,
Lake management actions - phosphorus control
The model was used to represent conditions in future ifno additional controls ofphosphorus supply
:fi:om the shoreline or watershed sources were put in place. The following changes may take place
over the next 20 years:
1. the commerciaVindustrialland will double in area
2. the residential area will increase by 20 %
3, rural land in pasture and forest and wetland will decrease by the areas occupied by 1.
&2.
4. the vacant but registered shoreline lots will be built as permanent residences,
8
A {V,...,
t ;"\ -, !
-r '-i .. i .'
.
"
The result of these forecasted changes was a total phosphorus increase to 17 ug/L. In other words,
ifno strategy for control of phosphorus is implemented over the next 20 years, the water quality of
the Lake could deteriorate further.
The phosphorus supply to Bass Lake can be broken down into controllable sources (Shoreline
development, urban storrnwater, agricultural) and uncontrollable sources (atmospheric input, export
ITom forested and wetland areas) (Table 4). An assessment of changes in tbe forest cover and
wetlands in the Bass Lake watershed (SSRAP unpublisbed) shows that there remains a healthy
proportion of cover (more than 30%) with some large areas of interior forest and wetlands.
Maintaining forest cover and wetlands by protective land use designations is an important measure
that will protect the lake in future. Urban storrnwater management practices could be implemented
for future and existing areas to reduce the supply of phosphorus. Several actions have been and can
be taken by fanners in the watershed to rriinimize the loss of soil and nutrients ::ITom agricultural
operations in the watershed. These include use of conservation tillage practices, restricting access
of livestock ::ITom streams and the development and implementation of nutrient management plans.
The model was again used to represent conditions in future with the following controls of phosphorus
supply:
1.
3.
Implement urban storrnwater management practices that will lead to a reduction in
this source by 20%
Implement a private sewage inspection program along the Bass Lake shoreline. This
is expected to virtually eliminate the possibility of ongoing pollution ITom faulty or
seriously substandard sewage systems
Implement rural non-point source control projects in fanns located in the watershed
with a goal of reducing total phosphorus ITom this source by 20%.
2.
Based on the modeled quality with the above controls in place, the predicted total phosphorus is
reduced by 2 ugIL or 12%.
In the case of rural non-point source controls, some implementation bas already been started and
should result in improved runoff ITom cultivated fields over the next few years. Other control
measures will require new implementation projects to be started. For example, correction of
inadequate shoreline private sewage systems could be carried out through a reinspection program by
the Township.
9
'-
f'f
r\l:J
/\0." ()
j;
Lake mana\!,ement actions - in-lake management techniQues
In-lake management techniques have been proposed in Gemza and Aubry (1999) involving lake
aeration. The Bass Lake cottagers Association has also proposed a restoration plan for Bass Lake
that involves dredging the sediment at the deepest point in the lake. The lake trophic status and the
sensitivity ofthe lake to changes in loadings do not appear to warrant such drastic action. The fact
that the lake appears to be changing in response to zebra mussel infestation suggests a ''wait and see"
option should be pursued to assess the oxygen regime after improved clarity. The bottom water
measurements of this survey and those ofGernza and Aubry (1999) did not indicate a significant build
up of phosphorus and the appropriateness of an oxic mode for the TSM suggest that the is no large
reservoir of nutrients in the sediment. The sediment measurement ofthis survey confirm that organic
matter and phosphorus concentrations in surficial sediment are not polluted and should be left intact.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
In summary, Bass Lake is sensitive to nutrient enrichment based on expected changes to the
watershed and based on the potential for extended anoxic conditions in the bottom waters that will
promote release of nutrients from the deep water sediments. With a concerted effort to control
sources of phosphorus to the lake, it is possible to reverse some of the effects of historical loadings
on the lake and prevent further deterioration.
The following actions are recommended for Bass Lake.
Shoreline
- ensure private sewage systems are working properly and fix those that aren't
- encourage naturalizing shoreline frontage on lake
Watershed
- encourage conservation tillage practices for cultivated land and implement nutrient
management plans for fanns in the Bass Lake watershed with a goal of reducing watershed
sources to the lake by 20%
- encourage urban stonnwater best management practices in existing ''residential'' catchments
with a goal of reducing this source of phosphorus by 20% over the long-term.
- encourage natural riparian vegetation along streams with a goal of 75% of stream banks
with natural vegetation
- maintain forest cover by encouraging planting of trees and protection of existing forest
stands.
- protect and enhance wetlands
10
-A 'Yf.
In ,d ' "
r~ .
\
Monitoring
_ open water quality sampling approximately every 5 years with continued year to year
participation in the Lake Partner Program.
_ swimming areas should be monitored annually especially the public swimming area as
development and increased stonnwater runoff occurs in the basin.
_ measure water level relative to the staff guage at the outlet dam or a fixed measuring point
at the dam and record seasonal changes,
REFERENCES
Dillon, P.J., K.B. Nicholls, W.A. Scheider, N.D. Yan and D.S. Jeffiies. 1986. Lakeshore capacity
study: Trophic status, Ontario Ministry of the EnvironmentlMinistry of Municipal Affairs Report.
Gernza, A.F. and Aubry, N. 1999. A water quality assessment of Bass Lake. Ontario Ministry of the
Environment, Lake Partner Program, Technical Report. 7pp.
Hutchinson, N.J., B.P. Neary, and P.J, Dillon. 1991. Validation and use of Ontario's Trophic Status
Model for establishing lake development guidelines. Lake and Reservoir Management 7(1):13-23.
Severn Sound RAP. 1993. SevernSoundRemedialActionPlan. Stage 2 RAP Report. ISBN: 0-7778-
1168- 5
Sherman, R.K. and Brown, S.L. 1995. Strategy for phosphorus control ftom estimated phosphorus
loads and predicted total phosphorus concentration in Penetang Bay, Georgian Bay, 1973 to 1992.
Water QuaI. Res. J. Canada 30(4):619-633.
Zimmerman, A.P., Noble, K,M., Gates, M.A. and Paloheimo, J .E. 1983. Physico-chemical typologies
of south-central Ontario lakes. Can. J. Fish. Aquat.Sci. 40: 1788-1803,
c
11
r rfi
, 6 u
Table 1 Mean Surficial Sediment Quality of Bass Lake ~A
with comparison to Sediment Quality Guidelines
(mg/kg unless otherwise indicated)
Penetang
Mean sd LEL SEL GSC Bay
Loss on Ignition (%) 37 3 148
Arsenic (As) 3 1 6 33 1 3.8
Beryllium (Be) 0.38 0.04
Bismuth (8i) 0.4 0.0
Cadmium (Cd) 1.5 0.2 0.6 10 0.66 0.83
Cobalt (Co) 4.4 1.0
Gallium (Ga) 3.83 0.45
Lanthanum (La) 9.72 0.64
Lithium (Li) 7.8 1.0
Molybdenum (Mo) 1.2 0.3
Nickel (Ni) 11.5 1.8 16 75 14 26
Lead (Pb) 79.2 7.0 31 250 9 37
Rubidium(Rb) 15.9 1.5
Antimony(Sb) 0.8 0.2
Thallium(TI) 0.202 0.035
Uranium (U) 2.08 0.90
Aluminium (AI) 13600 1047
Barium (8a) 299 15
Chromium (Cr)- 28 3 26 110 60 74
Copper (Cu) 19 3 16 110 20 36
Iron (Fe) 10741 875 20000 40000 23028
Manganese (Mn) 441 102 1100 454
Phosphorus (P) 974 103 600 2000
Strontium (Sr) 179 16
Vanadium (V) 24 3
Zinc (An) 124 11 120 820 103 140
sd= standard deviation
LEL= Lowest Effect Level of Sediment Quality Guidelines
SEL= Severe Effect Level of Sediment Quality Guidelines
GSC= typical lake sediment for area (Painter unpublished)
.r;
1 I).)
q ~ Ii
Table 2 Bass Lake Trophic Status
1973 to 2001
(ice-free mean values of at least six samples)
Year Total Chlorophyll. Secchi
Phosphorus disk
(ug/L) (ug/L) (m) Source
1973
1974
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1980
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2.6
2.4
6.4
6.5
4.8
13
13
6.7
6.1
4.6
4.2
4.0
12
18
16
11
3.1
2.2 MaE Self Help pgm
2.0 MaE Self Help Pgm
1.6 MaE Rec. Lakes pgm
1.9 MaE Self Help Pgm
2.0 MaE Self Help pgm
2.1 MaE Self Help Pgm
1.8 MaE Self Help Pgm
2.3 MaE Self Help Pgm
3.5 MaE Setf Help Pgm
Zimmerman et aI., 1983
1.9 Gemza and Aubry, 1999
2.8 MaE Lake Partner pgm
3.0 MaE Lake Partner pgm
3.0 MaE Lake Partner pgm
3.8 SSEA
Table 3
Calcium
Magnesium
Sodium
Potassium
Chlorides
Sulphate
Conductivity(uS/cm)
pH
~.
J\a~ \
1
,
Bass Lake Water Chemistry
1980 and 1996
(resu.lts in mg/L unless indicated)
1980(1 )
1996(2)
41.5
9.25
2.53
1.23
2.43
13.4
265
8.12
38.6
10.10
3.30
1.16
4.00
6.7
271
8.42
(1) Zimmerman et aI., 1983
(2) Gemza and Aubry, 1999
----~~
8d\\ng No !.Ag\ wi\h !.Ag\
~~~
j>.\tf\OS?het\c 1 n.7 1 \ 3.7 \ 13.7
Rura\ 596.2 [)65.\ 496.0
1131 1056 105.6
FOfes\. We~and and abandonn<:<l . 5595 424.7
Sboreline and commercIa' 471.6 .
---------
\294.7 \363.9 \\40.0
,ab\e 4
iSM FOR BASS LAKE
\aSI modif\Od (Januar'/ 16, 2002)
TOT AL SUPPL'f (k9/yr)
ano)(ic anoilc
--~~
8d\iO\l No Mg\ wi\b Mg\
--Tii1--Tii1--1\i1
596.2 565.\ 496.0
\\3.\ \05.6 \05.6
47~ ,6 559.5 424.7
------
\294.7 \363.9 \\40.0
,~
~
"
~(J
,J\
, .
. ' .
Table 5 anoxic anoxic
TSM FOR BASS LAKE Future Future Future Future
last modified (January 16,2002) Exiting No Mgt with Mgt Exiting No Mgt with Mgt
PREDICTED QUALITY
Summer average [TP] (mg/m3) 16 17 14 25 26 22
phytoplankton (mm3/l) 1.6 1.8 1.3 2.9 3.1 2.4
avg [chi aJ (mg/m3) 4.1 4.4 3.4 7.5 8.1 6.2
avg Secchi disc (m) 2.9 2.8 3.2 2.3 2.2 2.5
MEASURED QUALITY 1996 1996 1996 1996 1996 1996
Summer average [TP] (mg/m3) 13 13 13 13 13 13
phytoplankton (mm3/l) 1.44 1.44 1.44 1.44 1.44 1.44
avg [chi a] (mg/m3) 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2
avg Secchi disc (m) 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9
"-')
o::~""
C;'-"
. ,
Figure 1: Bass Lake and Watershed Area:
w
Bass Lake Wetland
& Life Sciences ANSI
Rugby West
Ufe Sciences ANSI
" .
Legend
[j:!:!:!:!il Open Water
N Drainage
~~ 1998 Forest Cover
C:] Watershed Boundary
L:I OMNR Evaluated Wetland
NRoad
500 0 500 1000 Meters
I
'. '"
~.!y",>
,~.
~
Legend
~ Sample Location
r::':;::;:;?1 Open Water
.::.........
N Drainage
t: . : . :11998 Forest Cover
[:J Watershed Boundary
D Parcel Bounda~
I\! Road ~.~
\.
o 300 MeterSb..,.?
I \":~
Figure 2: Bass Lake Sampling Locations
Produced by the Severn Sound Environmental Association under licence with
the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources e> Queen's Printer tor Ontario, 2002
. ,
Figure 3 Vertical profiles of temperature and dissolved
oxygen at two sites in Bass Lake on March 6, 2001
Temp.(OC)/D.O.(mg/L)
o 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
o I --J -+ --t- I--
Temp.(OC)/D.O.(mg/L)
o 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
o
\,
1
I
/
I
1
1
1
...
. .
\./
2
II.
/
..
...
j'
2
,/
o
CD
113
:::r
CJ
CD
5: 3
.. - . "'- ...... ."..~
-..
3
-.
3
.......
'-"
4
4
5
5 r
I
6.
..... '_,_v_' . ~'.._ . .... _ _..
6
.~... _.. __ .._. ,"~""". ,__.. ". _h_..". ,......... .... .. _U'.___ ""_W__'H'
....-_..... - .." ..,
........... _..u ..<-...........
7
7
~~
D
"~
~<~
__;.::r#"
.
figure 4l0\ and sediment pore water ammonia in core ~ r!p
sections at four stations in Bass Lake March 6, 2001
'E
(.)
~2
.g 6
(.)
~10
~30
o
(.)40
050
0..
,860
o
~70
15..80
Q)
o
BL'\ LO\
'E
(.)
~2
.g 6
(.)
~10
~30
o
(.)40
050
0..
,860
o
+-' 70
-:S
g.80
o
,
. . . \
~L'\ NH3 \
~ \
\
o 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
E E
(.) (.)
~2 ~2
0 6\.:2. LO\ ,g 6
"86 (.)
Q) ~10
Q)10
(\) Q)
020 820
(.)
030 '030
ft40 0..
,840
,850 ,850
.s:: .s::
"'Q.60 ~O
Q) Q)
0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
LO\ (%) NH3 (mgIL)
c: t:
(.) (.)
~2 ~2
0 6L3:LO\ 0
"8 6 "86
CD CD
Q) Q)
CD10 CD10
....
0 ....
(.)20 0
(.)20
'0 '0
0..30 \ 0..30
,8 ,8
,840 I ,840
.s:: \ .s::
15..50 15..50
Q)
0 Q)
0 10 20 30 40 SO 60 70 80 90 100 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
LO\ (%) NH3 (mglL)
5 0
......
g 4
:o:!
~ 8
:15
825
035
0..
,845
.855
.s::
'Q.65
Q)
o
~o..::
g 4
:o:!
~ 8
:15
825
'035
0..
,845
,855
.s::
'Q.65
(I)
o
SL4 NH3 "
o 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
LOI (%)
.~
9 10 11 12
Figure 5 Total phosphorus in core sections at four stations 0\
in Bass Lake March 6, 2001 ~.J'
E
~o
c:
o
:;:>
~ 2
II)
~ 4
o
o
'0 6
c..
.s 8
.s
~10
Q)
CI
0
~O
c:
.2 2
U
Q)
II) 4
Q)
...
0 6
0
-
~8
.s
010
-
~15
Q)
CI
0
~O
c:
0 2
-
0
CD
tn 4
~
0 6
0
-
~8
.s
010
-
J::
0.15
CD
CI
0
...
~O
c:
0 2
:;::I
0
CD
tn 4
~
0 6
0
"'-
~8
.s
010
-
J::
15.. 15
CD
0
0
BL 1 TP
400 800 1200 1600
Concentration (mglkg)
2000
BL2 TP
400 800 1200 1600 2000
Concentration (mglkg)
BL3 TP
400 800 1200 1600 2000
Concentration (mglkg)
BL4 TP
.
400 800 1200 1600 2000
Concentration (mglkg)
. ."
Figure 6 Metal~ (m~/kg) in sediment core sections at four 1q". 3 'if
E LRtatlons In Bass Lake March 6, L~1 '
(,) E
~ 0 Bl1 Cd ? 0
12 ~,.) 12
~ 4 ~ 4
8 8
o 6 0 6
~ ~
2 8 2 8
B ~
~10 ~10
~ ~
o 0
o 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2
Concentration (mglkg)
E
~O
c:
,g 2
()
~
~ 4
8 6
~8
2
210
~15
~
o
E
~O
,g 2 +
()
Q)
U)
~
o
()
- +'
~8
.9 +
010
..... +
~15
Q)
o
LEL
B12 Cd
o 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2
Concentration (mglkg)
E
~O
c:
.2 2
t)
Q)
U) 4
~
8 6
~8
2
010
.....
~15
Q)
o
E
~O
c:
:8 2
(,)
Q)
UI 4
~
8 6
"-
~8
o
~10
-
~15
Q)
o
Bl3 Cd
o 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2
Concentration (mglkg)
E
~O
g +
:;:; 2
~ +
UJ 4
~ +
8 6
- +
~8
2 +
010
..... +
~15
Q)
o
YII:I
BL4 Cd
,
o 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2
Concentration (mg/kg)
BL 1 pb
\ fu)
o
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Concentration (mg/kg)
YII:I
+
4
+ '
6
;
I
B12!Pb
, !
,
;
o
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Concentration (mg/kg)
BL3 Pb
o
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Cbncentration (mg/kg)
E
~O
c:
o
t) 2
Q)
U) 4
e
8 6
"-
~8
o
:s 10
.t::.
15.. 15
Q)
o
BL4 Pb
o
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Concentration (mg/kg)
, ^
. <' )
Figure 6 Metals (mg/kg) in sediment core sections at four A {yO j-
stations in Bass Lake March 6, 20e~ Ni ., - ';(
YI~ ~ ~~
o I
~o i
o '
13 2
(I)
en
~ 4
o
o
E
~o
c:
o
"'"
o
(I)
en
~
o
o
"-
o
c.. +
.8 8
.8 +
:510
c..
(I)
o
+
2
+
4
+
6
c:
~o
c:
o
:;::I
~ +
en
~
o
o
~ 8 +
.8 +
010
- +
%15
(I)
o
+
2
4
+
6
c:
~O
c:
,g 2
o
(I)
: 4
8 6
"-
~8
o
:E 10
%15
(I)
o
c:
~O
g +
13 2
(I) +
en 4
(I)
o +
o 6
"- +
~8
o +.
~10
- +
%15
(I)
Q
BL 1 Cr
C; );.
. i
!
o
5
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Concentration (mglkg)
YI~I
'0 6
c..
.s 8
.s
%10
(I)
Q
o
BL2 Cr
c:
~O
c:
.2 2
<:5
(I)
: 4
8 6
~8
o
:E10
%15
(I)
Q
o
o
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Concentration (mglkg)
BL3 Cr
!::
~O
c:
,g 2
o
(I)
: 4
8 6
~8
.8
010
-
%15
(I)
Q
o
o
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Concentration (mglkg)
., CI
BL4 Cr
c:
~O
c:
o
13 2
(I)
en 4
~
8 6
~8
.s
010
-
%15
(I)
Q
o
o
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Concentration (mg/kg)
9)
5 10 15
Concentration ( mglkg)
20
BL2Ni
5 10 15
Concentration (mglkg)
20
BL3 Ni
5 10 15 20
Concentration (mglkg)
BL4 Ni
5 1 0 15 20
Concentration (mg/kg)
-----
t '\ t1'\ off bO\'-ot1'\
f\g.7,er(l\). al\d D.O. a
/ - ..... - -----....------ ---.,.,.
....
----
.-_.... .-
'fIII!'
.....
25
...
~ '-1 ~)-----_.~ ".
.,'
~/",,,.
L..y"1
/"':"
~20
E-
6. '\5
o
/':--
o '\0
B-
0..
i 5
\-
_".,i
-----...---.......-..--.-- .
'.. ':',.,; : .<'.- I.. \ ".
i :
05-5ap ~ B-5aP 02-0C\
2 ~ _""\19
~ O-J\I\ 24-J\J\ 01-,..,\19
26-J\I{\
~ 5-t.M~'t 3~-,,^a't ~ 2-J\I{\
o
.' --..... --.
l' erop.
t /'.}
,.~
,
\")'~,
:",,,"""~:
Figure 8 SDV and ChI. a in Euphotic Zone
0.0
-
~
"-'
..c:
15. -2.0
Q)
Q
.-
..c:
8 -4.0
Q)
CJ)
-6.0
6.0 -.
-1
.......
0>
::J
....-
4.0 ro
>.
.c.
0-
o
2.0 0
-
.c.
()
. 0.0
May 15 June 12 July 10 Aug. 7 Sep.5 Oct. 2
May 31 June 26 July 24 . Aug. 21 Sep. 18
Date
.1
, .
.
\",..
".w::"'~'
....."'. s::)
'.
\a~'\
"'1...,.1;.., '"
',,-
0.06
:::J 0.05
.......
0>
-S0.04
c
o
~ 0.03
...
.....
c
~ 0.02
c
o
00.01
Fig.9 TP and ammonia
Euphotic zone and 1 m off bottom
o
15-May 31-May 12-Jun 26-Jun
10-Jul
24-JuJ 07-Aug 21-Aug 05-Sep 18-Sep 02-0ct
-Ef:33--
TPComp
-
TP 1 mob
-
NH3Comp
CD
NH3 1 mob
"-~~
1)
,
,i" (""\
\, t" .,
f~'.
'V
Fig.10 Zooplankton in Bass lake 2001
Seasonal biomass
200
,.-......
E 150
"'"
C>
E
';;; 1 00
(/)
co
E
.Q 50
(Q
O I ,
, ,
15-May31-May 12-Jun 26-Jun 10-Jul 24-Jul OB-Aug21-Aug05-Sep 1B-Sep 02-0ct
NDC . DC [J CAL . CYC
--
,.:
~
...
v-J~
-~
,.
Appendix 1 Open water quality data for station BL 2001
Composite Secchl Chlorophyll a Dorset Rexdale
Station Date Depth Depth corrected ChI. a Chl.b TP Phosphate TP Ammonia TKN Nitrate Total N Conductivity
BL 15-May 0-7 4.9 2.0 2.0 0.1 0.0050 0.001 0.008 0.012 0.30 0.103 0.403 240
BL 31-May 0-8 4.0 1.0 1.8 0.1 . 0.0070 0.001 0.012 0.004 0.32 0.034 0.354 227
BL 12-Jun 0-7.5 5.1 2.0 2.6 0.5 0.0080 0.001 0.008 0.010 0.28 0.015 0.295 241
BL 26-Jun 0-7 4.0 2.0 2.0 0.1 0.0130 0.001 0.024 0.008 0.56 0.007 0.567 257
BL 10-Jul 0-7.6 3.8 4.0 4.4 0.1 0.0110 0.001 0.008 0.002 0.30 0.005 0.305 252
BL 24-Jul 0-7.6 3.8 3.0 3.2 0.2 0.0100 0.001 0.010 0.002 0.38 0.005 0.385 272
BL 07 -Aug 0-6.2 3.1 2.0 2.0 0.1 0.0090 0.001 0.008 0.002 0.32 0.014 0.334 271
BL 21-Aug 0-7 3.5 3.0 3.2 0.1 0.0080 0.001 0.012 0.028 0.40 0.007 0.407 250
BL 05-Sep 0-6 2.8 4.0 4.4 0.2 0.0100 0.001 0.008 0.010 0.32 0.005 0.325 240
BL 18-Sep 0-6 3.0 4.0 5.2 0.2 0.001 0.012 0.002 0.36 0.005 0.365 231
BL 02-0ct 0-7.2 3.6 3.0 3.8 0.2 0.001 0.012 0.040 0.40 0.017 0.417 264
Mean 3.8 2.7 3.1 0.2 0.0090 0.001 0.011 0.011 0.36 0.020 0.378 249
$d 0.7 1.0 1.2 0.1 0.0023 0.000 0.005 0.012 0.08 0.029 0.075 15
Max 5.1 4.0 5.2 0.5 0.0130 0.001 0.024 0.040 0.56 0.103 0.567 272
Min 2.8 1.0 1.8 0.1 0.0050 0.001 0.008 0.002 0.28 0.005 0.295 227
Sample Dorset Rexdale
Station Date Depth TP Phosphate TP Ammonia TKN Nitrate Total N Conductivity Temp. D.O.
BLb 15-May 7 0.0070 0.001 0.012 0.018 0.28 0.105 0.385 234 15.8 10.6
BLb 31-May 8 0.0080 0.001 0.008 0.004 0.32 0.036 0.356 225 15.9 10.3
BLb 12-Jun 7.5 0.0120 0.001 0.020 0.012 0.44 0.018 0.458 229 16.3 9.7
Blb 26-Jun 7 0.0120 0.001 0.002 0.012 .0.08 0.006 0.086 253 19.5 6.6
BLb 10-Jul 7.5 0.0100 0.001 0.012 0.006 0.32 0.007 0.327 ~46 19.8 8.2
Blb 24-Jul 7.5 0.0110 0.001 0.012 0.002 0.36 0.005 0.365 264 21.3 6.6
Blb 07 -Aug 7.5 0.0200 0.001 0.020 0.002 0.36 0.014 0.374 269 22.7 4.5
Blb 21-Aug 7,5 0.0090 0.001 0.008 0.036 0040 0.011 0.411 255 21.9 7.1
BLb 05-Sep 7.2 0.0100 0.001 0.018 0.008 0.36 0.005 0.365 270 20.8 9.0
Blb 18-Sep 7.2 0.001 0.016 0.002 0040 0.005 00405 233 18.3 10.0
BLb 02-0ct 8 0.001 0.010 0.056 0.42 0.017 0.437 268 15.0 10.1
Mean 0.0110 0.001 0.013 0.014 0.34 0.021 0.361 250 18.8 8.4
sd 0.0038 0.000 0.006 0.017 0.10 0.029 0.099 17 2.7 2,0 ~
Max 0.0200 0.001 0.020 0.056 0.44 0.105 0.458 270 22.7 10.6
Min 0.0070 0.001 0.002 0.002 0.08 0.005 0.086 225 15.0 4.5 $)
,
w
<:>Q.
Appendix 3
{f\
AM 1...,
"\ ,..1.
List of Common Zooplankton Species
Encountered in Bass Lake (1996 & 2001\
Species
1996
2001
Non-daphnid Cladocera
A/ona so. **
Bosmina /onqirostris ** **
Ceriodaphnia /acustris ** **
Ceriodaohnia quadranau/a **
Chydorus sphaericus ** **
Eubosmina coreaoni **
Leptodora kindtii ** **
Polyphemus pediculus **
Sida crystallina **
Simoceohalus serrolatus **
Diaohanosoma biraeii **
Daphnid Cladocera
Daohnia aaleata mendotae ** **
Daphnia retrocUfva ** **
Calanoid Copepods
Calanoid copepodid ** **
Leptodiaptomus ash/andii **
Leptodiaptomus minutus **
Skistodiaptomus oreoonensis **
Epischura/acustris ** **
Epischura /acustris copeood ** **
Calanoid nauDIii ** **
Cyclopoid Copepods .
Cyc/opoid cooeoodid ** **
Diacyc/ops bicusoidatus thomasi ** **
Cyc/oos vemalis **
Eucyc!oos serru/atus **
Mesocyc/oos edax ** **
Cvc/opoid nauolii ** **
Trooocyc/oos extensus **
Dreissena oo/ymorpha veliaer **
"
'"
r;:
Number of Taxa I
20
22
Appendix 4
.
List of Submerged and F10ating Aquatic
Macrophytes Encountered in Bass lake (2001 \
-{q ,</0
f
S pedes
Common Name
Present
I Chara sP~.
Isoetes s .
I Stonewort
quillworrt
I
**
Potamogeton amplifolius bass weed
P. bicuspulatis narrow-leafed pondweed
P. crispus curly-leafed pondweed **
P. foliosus leafy pondweed
P. friesii narrow-leafed pondweed
P. oramineus variable pondweed
P. hillii narrow-leafed pondweed
P. lonoirotis narrow-leafed pondweed **
P. natans floatino leafed pondweed
P. pectinatus saoo pondweed
P. perfoliatus Richardson's pondweed
P. praelonous whitestem pondweed
P. pusillus slender oondweed
P. richardsonii Richardson's pondweed
P. robbinsii Robbinson's pondweed
P. spirillus snailseed Dondweed
P. strictifolius narrow-leafed Dondweed
P. zosteriformis flat-stemmed Dondweed **
bush ondweed
bush ondweed
arrowhead
Canada waterweed
ta e rass
**
**
Eleocharis acicularis needle rush
Lemna trisulca star duckweed
Eriocaulon sp. pipewort
Pontederia cordata ' pickerel weed
Heteranthera dubia water stargrass
Ceratophyllum demersum coontail **
Nuphar so. I yellow waterlilY **
Ranunculus so. water buttercup
Myriophyllum alterniflorum milfoi)
M. excelbascens milfoil
M. heterophyllum milfoil
M. spicatum Eurasian milfoil
M. verticilatum Bracted milfoil
Megalodonta beckii water marioold
~,\\\
Appendix 5 anoxic anoxic
TSM FOR BASS LAKE Future Future Future Future
last modified (January 16, 2002) Exiting NoMgt with Mgt Exiting No Mgt with Mgt
Year 93-99 93-99 93-99 93-99 93-99 93-99
Mean annual water elevation(m) 251.8 251.8 251.8 251.8 251.8 251.8
Volume (x10^6 m3) 18.807 18.807 18.807 18.807 18.807 18.807
Surface Area (Km') 5.495 5.495 5.495 5.495 5.495 5.495
Mean Depth (m) 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 '-"
Max Depth (m) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0
DRAINAGE BY LANDUSE(ha)
Forest & wetland (incl.abandoned and vacant) 1130.8 1055.6 1055.6 1130.8 1055.6 1055.6
Agriculture (cultivated) 1484.3 1484.3 1484.3 1484.3 1484.3 1484.3
Agriculture (pasture) 1006.2 931.8 931.8 1006.2 931.8 931.8
CommerciaVlndustrial 70.5 141.0 141.0 70.5 141.0 141.0
ResidentiaVlnstitutional(incl.roads) 395.9 475.1 475.1 395.9 475.1 475.1
Total Drainage Area (Km2) 40.88 40.88 40.88 40.88 40.88 40.88
Total Rural 38.19 37.09 37.09 38.19 37.09 37.09
Total Urban 2.68 3.79 3.79 2.68 3.79 3.79
Oxic{1}/Anoxic{2} (type) 2 2 2
Shoreline Development
Residential units 212 212 212 212 212 212
Seasonal units 0 0 0 0 0 0
Camp units 230 230 230 230 230 230
Motel units
Vacant lots 19 19 19 19 19 19
FLOW COEFFICIENTS
Unit runoff rural(m/yr) 0.3306 0.3306 0.3306 0.3306 0.3306 0.3306
Unit runoff urban(m/yr) 0.432 0.432 0.432 0.432 0.432 0.432
Precipitation (m/yr) 0.984 0.984 0.984 0.984 0.984 0.984
Evaporation (m/yr) 0.635 0.635 0.635 0.635 0.635 0.635
Ground water input
Ground water leakage
Total Outflow (x10^6 m3/yr) 15.70 15.82 15.82 15.70 15.82 15.82
Flushing Rate (timeslyr) 0.835 0.841 0.841 0.835 0.841 0.841
Areal Water Load (m/yr) 2.858 2.878 2.878 2.858 2.878 2.878
Phosphorous Retention 0.813 0.812 0.812 0.716 0.714 0.714
Response Time (years) 0.622 0.621 0.621 0.943 0.942 0.942
PHOSPHORUS SUPPLY COEFFICIENTS
Precip Loading (KgIKm".yr) 20.7 20.7 20.7 20.7 20.7 20.7
Export by landuse (kg TPJkm2)
Forest & wetland (incl.abandoned and vacant) 10 10 10 10 10 10
Agriculture (cultivated) 30 30 24 30 30 24
Agriculture (pasture) 15 15 15 15 15 15
CommerciaVlndustrial 36 36 36 36 36 36
ResidentiaVlnstitutional(jncl.roads) 61 61 48.8 61 61 48.8
SUPPLY (kgly)
Atmospheric 113.7 113.7 113.7 113.7 113.7 113.7
Watershed sources
Forest & wetland (jncl.abandoned and vacant) 113.1 105.6 105.6 113.1 105.6 105.6
Agriculture (cultivated) 445.3 445.3 356.2 445.3 445.3 3562
Agriculture (pasture) 150.9 139.8 139.8 150.9 139.8 139.8
CommerciaVlndustrial 25.4 50.8 50.8 25.4 50.8 50.8
ResidentiaVlnstitutional(jncl.roads) 241.5 289.8 231.8 241.5 289.8 231.8
Total watershed 976.2 10312 884.1 9762 1031.2 884.1
Shoreline 204.7 '219.0 142.1 204.7 219.0 142.1
Residences 158.7 158.7 88.2 158.7 158.7 88.2
Cottages 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Campgr.units 46.0 46.0 46.0 46.0 46.0 46.0
Motel units 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Vacant lots 0.0 142 7.9 0.0 14.2 7.9
TOTAL SUPPLY 1294.7 1363.9 1140.0 1294.7 1363.9 1140.0
SUPPLY TRANSFERRED 242.5 256.9 214.8 367.9 389.5 325.6
TOTAL LOADING (mglm2.yr) 235.6 2462 207.5 235.6 2482 207.5
1Q,t./1
,
Appendix 5 anoxic anoxic
TSM FOR BASS lAKE Future Future Future Future
last modified (January 16, 2002) Exiting NoMgt with Mgt Exiting No Mgt with Mgt
PREDICTED QUALITY
Summer average [rP] (mg/m') 16 17 14 25 26 22
phytoplankton (mm'lL) 1.6 1.8 1.3 2.9 3.1 2.4
avg [chi a] (mglm') 4.1 4.4 3.4 7.5 8.1 6.2
avg Secchi disc (m) 2.9 2.8 3.2 2.3 2.2 2.5
MEASURED QUALITY 1996 1996 1996 1996 1996 1996
Summer average [rP] (mg/m3) 13 13 13 13 13 13
phytoplankton (mm'lL) 1.44 1.44 1.44 1.44 1.44 1.44
avg [chi a] (mgIm') 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2
avg Secchi disc (m) 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9
Atmospheric 113.7 113.7 113.7 113.7 113.7 113.7
Rural 596.2 585.1 496.0 596.2 585.1 496.0
Forest, Wetland and abandonned 113.1 105.6 105.6 113.1 105.6 105.6
Shoreline and Commercial 471.6 559.5 424.7 471.6 559.5 424.7
TOTAL SUPPLY (kglyr) 1294.7 1363.9 1140.0 1294.7 1363.9 1140.0
REPORT
f6-1
DEPT. REPORT TO: Council PREPARED BY:
#ES2002-08 Keith Mathieson
SUBJECT & FILE #: DEPARTMENT:
COUNCIL:
Request for Streetlights on Public Works
Bass Line
C.OFW.
MOTION #: DATE:
DATE: February 21, 2002
',"
v
Residents in the area of Bass Line requested the installation of five (5) streetlights on Bass Line. As
per Section 5(a)(i) of the Township's Streetlight Policy, all residents within the area that would benefit
from the streetlights were asked to respond by February 15, 2002 if they were or were not in favour of
the streetlights. A copy of the letter that was mailed out to the residents is attached for Council's
perusal.
Two hundred and eleven (211) letters were mailed out on January 17, 2002.
A response was received back from one hundred and nineteen (119) residents in the form of letters,
petitions, phone calls and e-mails. Ninety-nine (99) residents were not in favour of the streetlights
and eighteen (18) were in favour of the streetlights; two (2) responses had no name attached and
nine (9) letters were returned by Canada Post.
'"
1. THAT the five (5) streetlights requested on Bass Line not be installed.
2. THAT Ms. Mary Ann Clarke be notified of Council's decision.
3. THAT Council receives and adopts this report.
-'"
Keith Mathieson
c~
lJ")0 i ~
L~~.~u
\.
18-;)--
THE CORPORATION OF THE
148 Line 7 S., Box 100
Oro, Ontario LOL 2XO
TOWN~lIIP
-&rv-orJ16edvW
Phone (705)487-2171
Fax (705) 487-0133
www.township.oro-medonte.on.ca
January 16, 2002
Dear Property Owner:
The Council of Oro-Medonte Township has been requested to reconsider the
installation of five (5) streetlights on Bass Line. The location of these lights, if
approved by Council and Hydro One, would be on existing hydro poles as shown
on the attached map.
Under Section 5(a)(i) of the Township's Streetlight Policy, Bass Line is considered
an arterial road and installation of streetlights on Bass Line would benefit the
adjacent developments on Plans 629 (Nelson Street), 979 and 1222 (Ward
Avenue), 1270 (Broadview Avenue), 1310 (Joy Avenue and Glengrove Avenue),
Orser Drive, Vine Street, Bards Beach Road, as well as Bass Line.
All capital and operating costs of these proposed lights would be the
responsibility of each lot owner in this area.
The capital cost to install these five (5) streetlights on Bass Line on existing hydro
poles would be approximately $3,750.00 and the cost would be divided equally
amongst the 180 lot owners.
Operating and capital costs for year one would be approximately $28.00 for each
lot owner. Each subsequent year, a rate will be set that will cover the cost of
hydro, maintenance and to establish a reserve fund. This rate would be
approximately $8.00 . $10.00 per lot based on 180 lots in the area. This rate is
reviewed annually by Council.
The Township is requesting that you be:
1. In favour of the installation of the five (5) proposed streetlights on Bass Line
and that a capital and operating cost of $28.00 for 2002 will be added to your
tax bill, and an operating and maintenance cost of $8.00 - $10.00 per year (to
be reviewed annually) will be added to your tax bill each year thereafter.
2. Not in favour of the installation of the proposed streetlights on Bass Line.
1b~,3
I
Page 2
Your response to this proposal may be forwarded, in writing, to the Township of
Oro-Medonte at Box 100, Oro Station, Ontario LOL 2XO, or bye-mail at
engineering@township.oro-medonte.on.ca or by telephone at (705) 487-6499, to
the attention of the undersigned, until February 15, 2002.
....
Following tabulation of the results, a report will be prepared for Council's
cons ide ration.
..
Keith Mathieson, C.R.SJ.
Director of Engineering and Environmental Services
c.c. Mayor Beard
Members of Council
Jennifer Zieleniewski
...
, .
~
" . .~,
.
r ORO-MEDONTE
o
~L\~~\
---._._~-
, 2
'117
'""
U7
In
-
- - - ..
, ; n ,21 .\....!
'~ '7 ~ -. - r
141
- - - - ....
... - - --
- -
32 ,31 ", iK,24 i II
AI/ENUE
CON I
/ 0 - -----
...... / C'
'185
... - - - -,
w
:.: .~
"':;;:::i ..: ", ~ ""'-_
" .. tI~litti" ~ .~
~r;
I
I
I SIMCOE ASSESSMENT OFfICE
SCALf: ,. - 100'
MAr- ..;)v
~~y
(g) FI uE. Pe.oPO">'ED
S~ \.-\Ct~
\-0 ~ no>-\.5
., ~~ ... - -.
'I'
~'*'
. ~<Ir-",
.~...#
., ~...
. ,,"
~~
i1 ~'s'
~~
..
CO/V I
LOT 3
C ONTARIO PROPERTY ASSESSMENT CORPORATION
f\:t - !
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE
MINUTES
FEBRUARY 19, 2002
PRESENT:
Peter Wigham. Susan Grant. Robert Barlow, Fran Sutton, Don
Bell, Councillor Paul Marshall, Councillor Ruth Fountain, and
Mayor Ian Beard
~
.
STAFF PRESENT: Andria Leigh
1. Call to Order by Chairman
Chairman Ian Beard called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m.
2. "DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST AND THE GENERAL
NATURE THEREOF - IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ACT."
None declared.
3. Minutes
Moved by Bob Barlow. seconded by Fran Sutton
That the minutes of the meeting of the Township of Orc-Medonte Planning
Advisory Committee held on December 18, 2001 be adopted as amended. The
minutes were amended to reflect the correct legal description for Development
Application P-125/01 (Horseshoe Resort - Carriage Hills Phase IV) to read
Concession 3, Part of Lot 2 (arc) and not Concession 4, Part of Lot 2 (arc)
Carried.
4. Correspondence and Communication
None Received.
..
5.
Deputations
t <q - ;r/
7:00 p.m.
Mike Gannon P-128/01
Concession 13, South Part of Lot 1 (Medonte)
Proposed Zoning By-law Amendment
In Attendance: No One
Ms. Leigh explained that this application had been submitted as a condition of consent
that had been granted by the Committee of Adjustment in 2001. She explained that the
property was located on Catherine Street which had a plan of subdivision on the east
side of the road and had identified the west side of the road as Rural Residential in the
Official Plan to allow for the development of lots on both sides of the existing road. She
explained that the intent of the zoning by-law amendment would be to recognize the lot
frontage and lot area of the two lots that had been created by consent.
Moved by Peter Wig ham, seconded by Susan Grant
"It is recommended to Council that the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment for
Development Application P-128/01 (Mike Gannon), Concession 13, South Part of
Lot 1 (Medonte), as a condition of consent for two residential lots proceed to a
Public Meeting in accordance with the provisions of the Planning Act."
...Carried.
7:10 p.m.
Jonathan and Yanda Palter P-127/01
Concession 5, North Part of Lot 3 (Oro)
Proposed Official Plan Amendment
In Attendance: No One
Ms. Leigh explained that the applicant had telephoned and requested a deferral until the
March meeting of the Committee, as they would be out of province tonight.
7:20 p.m.
John Strimas P-129/01
Concession 8, North Part of Lot 12 (Medonte)
Proposed Zoning By-law Amendment
In Attendance: No One
Ms. Leigh explained that the applicant's solicitor had sent a request by facsimile today
requesting a deferral until the March meeting of the Committee in order to provide an
Yer ~3
opportunity for the solicitor to meet with the Planner prior to the meeting with the
Committee.
...
Chuck and Bonnie Hamilton P-130102
Concession 8, Part of Lot 16 (Medonte)
Proposed Temporary Use By-law Amendment
..
In Attendance: Chuck and Bonnie Hamilton, Applicant's
Ms. Leigh explained the changes that had occurred in the Planning Act to permit Garden
Suites (Granny Flats) as a temporary use for a period of ten years. She explained that
the Act allowed for Council to enter into an agreement to ensure the removal of the unit
and that a standard agreement had been provided to the Committee for their
information. She explained that the unit was to be provided for the existing occupant
and was not transferable should the property be sold. She explained that the Township
has established a policy of requiring the unit to be located on the same services as the
existing dwelling to ensure that it was as temporary as possible. She further indicated
that this application conformed with the Township policy and should therefore proceed to
a Public Meeting as required by the Planning Act.
Moved by Susan Grant, seconded by Bob Barlow
"It is recommended to Council that the proposed Temporary Use By-law
Amendment to permit a Garden Suite being Development-Application P-130/02
(Hamilton), Concession 8, Part of Lot 16 (Medonte), proceed to a Public Meeting in
accordance with the requirements of the Planning Act."
.. .Carried.
Jeff Howard P-131/02
Concession 8, East Pt of Lot 7, RP 51 R-13470, Part 1 (Medonte)
Proposed Temporary Use By-law Amendment
In Attendance: No One
'tI
Ms. Leigh explained the changes that had occurred in the Planning Act to permit Garden
Suites (Granny Flats) as a temporary use for a period of ten years. She explained that
the Act allowed for Council to enter into an agreement to ensure the removal of the unit
and that a standard agreement had been provided to the Committee for their
information. She explained that the unit was to be provided for the existing occupant
and was not transferable should the property be sold. She explained that the Township
has established a policy of requiring the unit to be located on the same services as the
existing dwelling to ensure that it was as temporary as possible. She further indicated
,.
~cJj
that this application conformed with the Township policy and should therefore proceed to
a Public Meeting as required by the Planning Act.
Moved by Don Bell, seconded by Peter Wig ham
"It is recommended to Council that the proposed Temporary Use By-law
Amendment to permit a Garden Suite being Development Application P-131/02
(Howard), Concession 8, East Part of Lot 7, RP 51R-13470, Part 1 (Medonte),
proceed to a Public Meeting in accordance with the requirements of the Planning
Act."
...Carried.
6. Other Business
None.
7. Adjournment
Moved by Don Bell
That the meeting now adjourn at 7:35 p.m.
Carried.
Mayor Ian Beard, Chairman
Andria Leigh, Planner
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
FROM THE TOWNSHIP PLANNER
IRE PORT TO COUNCIL
I
REPORT NO.: PD2002-11 COUNCIL
PREPARED BY: Andria Leigh C. OF W.
DATE: February 25, 2002 MOTION
SUBJECT: Committee of Adjustment DATE
Decisions for February 14, 2002
I SUMMARY
Attached are the Planning Reports and Committee of Adjustment Decisions for the Consent
and Minor Variance applications that were heard at the Committee of Adjustment meeting held
on February 14, 2002. The last date for receiving an appeal to the above noted decisions is
Wednesday March 6, 2002.
Consent Applications
B-l/02 Robert and Jacqueline Nunn
Con 1, East Part of Lot 14 (Oro)
322 Line 1 N.
B-6/02 Roger and Dorothy Holliday
Con 1, Part Lots 14 & 15 (OriIlia)
5491 Highway 1 L
B-4/02 Lyle and Sharon Johnston
Con 9, South Part Lot 1 (Oro)
3288 Line 9 S.
B-5/02 Paul and Karen Vandergeest
Con 5, Pt. Lot 22 (Oro)
Minor Variance Applications
A-2/02 Claudio Venditti
Plan 626, Lot 10 (Oro)
19 Stanley Ave.
A-3/02 Township ofOro-Medonte
Con 11, S Pt Lot 13 (Medonte)
67 Eady Station Road
A-4/02 1391191 Ontario Limited
Cone. 2, Lot 15
Plan 51R-24174, Lot 8 (Oro)
.
I
I
~
Respectfully submitted,
~~--{~
Andria Leigh, Hons B.A,AMCT, MCIP,RPP
Township Planner
C.A.o. COMMENTS:
DATE:
C.A.o.
~frl~fJ}v
DEPT.HEAD
"
Committee of Adjustment
Planning Report
February 14, 2002
1391191 Ontario Limited
A-4/02
Con.2,Lot15, iformerOro)
Lot 8, Plan 51R-24174
510 Line 2 N
The Proposal
The applicant is requesting relief from the minimum required lot frontage from 45 metres
(147.6 feet) to 36.36 metres (119.3 feet) within an existing Draft Approved Subdivision.
Policy
Official Plan Designation:
Zoning By-law:
Rural Residential
Rural Residential One Hold (RUR1(H)) and Environmental
Protection (EP)
Comments
Roads Superintendent:
Building Department:
No concerns
No concerns
Planning Department Comments
1. Does the variance conform with the general intent of the Official Plan?
The subject property is designated Rural Residential in the Official Plan. The intent of
Rural Residential Designation is to recognize existing estate, country estate and chalet
residential developments in the Township. Pennitted uses on lands designated Rural
Residential are limited to single detached dwellings, home occupations, bed and breakfast
establishments and accessory uses. The proposed lot is in a draft plan approved residential
subdivision. On this basis, the application would appear to confonn with the general
intent of the policies of the Official Plan.
2. Does the variance conform with the general intent of the Zoning By-law?
"
. ,.
The subject property is zoned Rural Residential One (RUR1) and Environmental
Protection (EP) Zoning in By-law 97-95. The proposed variance would pennit a lot
within a draft plan approved subdivision to be less than the minimum lot frontage
required. The proposed variance confonns with the general intent of the Zoning By-law.
1
3. Is the variance desirable for the appropriate development of the lot?
Upon site inspection it is evident that the proposed lot that is within a draft plan approved
subdivision and would be in keeping with the proposed subdivision.
4. Is the variance minor in nature?
The proposed variance is considered minor in nature on the basis that the reduction in the
frontage is minimal and all other setbacks provisions are being maintained.
Recommendation
It is recommended that Minor Variance Application A-4/02 be granted subject to the
standard conditions.
Decision
BE IT RESOLVED that:
Moved by, Joe Charles seconded by, Albert Pross
"That the Committee hereby GRANT Minor Variance Application A-4/02 subject to the
following conditions:
1. That an Ontario Land Surveyor provide verification to the Township of compliance
with the Committee's decision by 1) pinning the footing and 2) verifying in writing
prior to pouring of the foundation by way of survey/real property report prepared by
an Ontario Land Surveyor.
2. That the setbacks be in conformity with the dimensions as set out in the application, as
submitted;
3. That the Township of Oro-Medonte Building Department approve of the application, in
writing;
4. That the appropriate building permit be obtained from the Township's Chief Building
Official only after the Committee's decision becomes final and binding, as provided
for within the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P. 13;
5. That all municipal taxes be paid to the Township ofOro-Medonte
.. ...Carried."
2
:. :....,. k~~j~~':-~~;P'-'~:: ~.~.-:- - ~ -- - - - - - - - -~\ - - - - - e
w ....... ... rl,,, I".. ' ......"........... -",. ", <SQ - - - - - - - -
F ,.,,, ." ",., (, :.:!'! \.1 I ~ ,-' ., ,) '" () ') a:i i,1 :; -; M I -". -'" - - - - - - - - - - -
_ _ _ _ ~~~, I (""""" ~)...:....::. .. , .. -, .:... :::..:."_ .-: :1 _ .1 ,.I tV \.' .+! () -j 7 \,' (J \.' () ,1
I I t..: :/.:::......"t...-~1.~::'C t: .N'.:.,..:
, ~..., ""... ~.. -z....-,~. "'0< ----,-=:.....:.:...--- -----
'" . -I "'. I' \ ----,--
0\ ~.~ .- ""'" .. ....., I \
I ~ \ - 1)0()'18 .. '" ,,,' ''1 \ 1
I ;; I >- ' 8 ~ 'i: \ iJ \
~. I ~:h ~ · ~ I .- ~. h I
\ ;: ,,' . 1/ ; ~ I ". t!: \ .- \
\ I "'I '" - ~.< I ' i I ~ \ \ ~ \ ; \
n - lu Ii I ". \
I ...0......... ::::,.. ...~' ....0......... - - - - :::- tyL - - - - - - - _I
I __i ~~~ :;;;;. 1
1 1 ~ F.'~' I ~1 ~ 1
I ~ ~ I :i: :'!\ ,;: ~ \
....-.. ~ ~~ -. :~ ~
\ ... \ :-.1 -. J, I
\ \ ,.,\ ~i ',> I
1 ,,~, ............. 0) -~: I I :: I ~ :~,'
: ~'S:~:\ "- ~~ i
I ::. ?\'~ :q ::. I
\ .~. .
I .:i\.. ~ I :1. ..\ I- - .
I ~') ~ ~~ ~ ":t I I ~: \ I
1'- 14'11. il ~:::I~ \
\ c';! . - ......"..... ~
I~ -\
~.,
I:; ~
I~
I....
\ i:~..'
O~
\ .-J8
\ :~.~
I t:.:U;
,..~
1 :i:";'
~- .-
\ lu:5!.
IT\~
1-'
I t3
1<'
....'
I :i:
'0
I ~ ~
I '. i
I :~
"\
\ }:.-:.
1'-
I
I
\
\
1
1
I
\
\
1
1
1
\
~".:;
~
~
.... ""-st.et.tZN
t':.:
"
'.
t'l.
\~
I I
\
onto
.....
~"''''''
&"OS,t_.
I
:~)
qZ ){Q078 ,-
~\:
:: ~ '.
..
".
...... .....' 6l.."
........... . , ....
i/ u"Cu:
i- f ,i
<:>
;.-
t~:
of.
"
..... \
, 'I'
...oo.lI.'C'M -Ii
I ~
,
~
Z
Committee of Adjustment
Planning Report
February 14,2002
The Township of Oro-Medonte
A-3/02
Con. 11, South Part Lot 13, (former Medonte)
67 Eady Station Road
The Proposal
The applicant is requesting relief for:
a) Minimum required rear yard setbackfrom 2 metres (6.5 feet) to 1.52 metres (5 feet) for
an addition to an existing storage shed.
b) Minimum required front yard setback from 8 metres (26.2feet) to 0.00 metres (0.00
feet) for an addition to an existing storage shed.
c) Reliefis also need from the maximumjloor size from 70 square metres (753.5 feet) to
89.2 square metres (960 square feet) for the addition to an existing storage shed.
Policy
Official Plan Designation:
Zoning By-law:
Agricultural
AgriculturallRural (A/RU) Zone
Comments
Roads Superintendent:
Building Department:
No concerns
All components of a sewage system are required to be
maintained on a single parcel of land. From information
provided, sewage system appears to be constructed on two
properties. Prior to approval, verification is required that
sewage system is contained on one lot or properties deemed
as one lot.
Planning Department Comments
1. Does the variance conform with the general intent of the Official Plan?
The subject property is designated Agricultural in the Official Plan. The general intent of
the policies is to preserve the agricultural lands of the Township and to maintain the open
countryside. The proposed addition to an existing accessory building would generally
conform to the intent of the Official Plan policies, given the location of the property to
agricultural lands.
1
2. Does the variance conform with the general intent of the Zoning By-law?
The subject property is zoned Agricultural/Rural (AIRU) in the Township's Zoning By-
law 97-95, as amended. The intent of the By-law is to establish setback requirements,
which assist in maintaining the character of the rural area. The proposed variance would
permit an increase in the maximum floor area of an accessory building, and would permit
it to be located closer to the rear yard setback, and front yard setback required for a
detached accessory structure. Therefore the variance conforms with the general intent of
the Zoning By-law as an accessory building is permitted within the Agricultural/Rura1
(AIRU) Zone.
3. Is the variance desirable for the appropriate development of the lot?
Upon site inspection it is evident that the proposed addition would not appear to impact
on the neighbouring properties and would be located in an area which does not affect the
existing structure, well, or septic on the property.
4. Is the variance minor in nature?
The proposed variance is considered minor in nature on the basis of the information
provided above,
Recommendation
It is recommended that Minor Variance Application A-3/02 be granted subject to the
standard conditions and satisfaction of the building department requirements regarding
the sewage system approval for the structure from Council in accordance with the budget
is also required.
Decision
BE IT RESOLVED that:
Moved by, Albert Pross seconded by, Dave Edwards
"That the Committee hereby GRANT Minor Variance Application A-3/02 as a amended to
a 1 metre (3.28 feet) setback from the front yard and subject to the following conditions:
1. That an Ontario Land Surveyor provide verification to the Township of compliance
with the Committee's decision by 1) pinning the footing and 2) verifying in writing
prior to pouring of the foundation by way of survey/real property report prepared by
an Ontario Land Surveyor.
2
2. That the setbacks be in confonnity with the dimensions as set out in the application, as
submitted;
3. That the Township ofOro-Medonte Building Department approve of the application, in
writing;
4. That the appropriate building pennit be obtained from the Township's Chief Building
Official only after the Committee's decision becomes final and binding, as provided
for within the Planning Act R.S.O, 1990, c.P. 13;
5. That all municipal taxes be paid to the Township ofOro-Medonte
,jJ
6. That the applicant applies to the Committee of Adjustment to merge the two
properties together. (67 and 73 Eady Station Road)
.. ...Carried."
3
\
\
\ \. ~
\ ~i \-
c... .2\
~k~
"
92
\~ Sl
\-~
cr
. \
'~ .
:-
.
, ~, 0
\ ...
.~4 , ._
I
..., '\I
-t
/0
j ..
~
--
C'.-4.4i.
C,.. "'0/04.4/
""""t''''.
Ci
, i
/ '
......----
.
1~~/)y
"'~t
. J
~
~o~
II",..,. ''''t 0
. ItfI 'It-
""20, O"~t"l
I~.~,
".. .. .
t" . 1'...,....
00 tt -..,
,t
..
. I~
~ '~f'l.a.
.. , JiIro'"
4
~..
.~.
,,<io
.
.". .,.
d-' ."
. ..... .,..
~ 1"- "'.
..... "..,. ...
...,..
,,," ~.
".,. - 0
\;
~c
"
.~
. ..
W
....1
cr.'
t~
l]1,
~
~\
-0
\ '" "V "^
-:p ";.,
'\
trw
e
-t..
Decision
BE IT RESOLVED that:
Moved by, Dave Edwards seconded by, Joe Charles
"That the Committee hereby DEFER Minor Variance Application A-2/02 as more
infonnation is required to satisfy Committee.
" ...Carried."
3
\
f-X/57/r-J&
--
-----
~ Ie)
,.,I' ~ ""-
. ~ ~ v '- po I ~G'
C N r ~ ' .t.'" II!
..^o~ ^' ~t.t. "
r;;"'1 r ;-' c"t. .~."~'
If,... \I'" ,'"
T' o~1\ \..t. \'f10oq'
I tl j'\ . /~.'/.1.
\ r I~.. U '
" t. I 'V- ...t.:
\ 00.. \", j \ 0.<10
~O ,.,.' ! 1\
l' \ \
. \
6' ! )1
~ \
\\J
....
-,
0',
Q)
~
\\)
Cj)
I.... \... I...
oc:. ~
.... ..., ..~ 01
~
,S
(,\
'"
~
(,Q
Q.V
~'
I.....
<<::\
...J
,.r':,
f J
:y.....
..
~
(,\j
\0
C)
....
+1
1'\
.,
II!
......
\D
\0
'.
~.
..
: II
.. .
-!
. ...
-
"1-
~ : i.
:I _.
r>-' -I
,
<('V II! I.....
<:
.
"- Q, .. <:)
..
.
~ :I:
C) ...J
-...J
~ /
:
0
-
,.
.... ;.
00
N...
1'\.. I...:
za
\')
~
'.
~
I...
(I)
?:
.
o
11'1
-..
~'"
0-
....
~
o~
c: I MC
... ' NOTj
THf; \..IM
H!flEON
~
A~t::-
II ~ t.-' ps :t ~ ':iC( r
r::N't 0-.
~ tfo !()>Ei) y(v n~f' ,;
~ r 1 t
f'!~ I~i' } "-I
---- \
., t-
CO \0
. C) .1 ~ .\
f,)o '..
. ...... 1'\
,!\1J?- ~~ ., I
,~.,.1 on \
...-G' 1.1) ~\
~~" \0 \
,-' II
,0'" ,"'- IDa 011 ;',J i
.....,.," a. C.'" -- \
'..
-.. t-.
(1', '- . ~ \
Q) ~ - I \
0) \0 1\ _
\ ...
"t ,,) ~ \\ tl
\ t>-'
~V \ ; III ,....
~
- WI
.
: D - ~
.. . h. .
0, .
I... I... -! .
I... ~ &
~<::. ~ ~ "'.I
"'0 .
,..I ..... ....1 01 ...J 1.'10-\
~ I
""t II
~'~f
.
(,Q 0110.' 0
-
. II
~V . .... ';,
c{..' .. 00
0
111
,S I..... , .
-o~.~ .
N..
t;,' 0- .", .. !...:
za
~ ~ \.')
~ ?:
...J
I... ~
I')
~
Ot'.'.\
.. ..,,,
0....\1
..,
\tlU t
~
,..o~
S \ i'ft V ,N 0_7
TH~ t. "
HfflEOI
OF THE
..- _.. ~ -
Committee of Adjustment
Planning Report
February 14,2002
Paul and Karen Vandergeest
B-5/02
Con 5, Part Lot 22 (former Ora)
The Proposal
The applicant is proposing a lot addition to an adjacent parcel of land. The land to be
conveyed has a lot frontage of 46 metres (150.9 feet), a lot depth of 121.92 metres (400
feet), and a lot area of 0.56 hectares (1.39 acres). The land will be added to a lot that has
a lot frontage of 48.79 metres (160.07 feet), a lot depth of 121.92 metres (400 feet) and a
lot area of 0.59 hectares (1.47 acres).
Policy
Official Plan Designation:
Zoning By-law:
Industrial
Economic Development (ED) Zone
Comments
Roads Superintendent:
Building Department:
No concerns
No concerns
Planning Department Comments
Official Plan
The subject property is designated Industrial in the Township's Official Plan. The
general intent of this policy is to provide lands for the creation of industrial employment
opportunities at locations that maximize the use of existing infrastructure and to ensure
that the design of new industrial development is sensitive to the rural character of the
Township and contributes to the improvement of the appearance of the Highway 11
Corridor. The application will allow for the construction of a manufacturing building
which is permitted in this designation, no new l()twill be created, therefore
this application would be deemed to generally conform to the policies of the Official Plan.
Zoning By-law
The subject property is zoned Economic Development (ED) in the Township's Zoning
By-law 97-95, as amended. The new lot would appear to comply with the Zoning By-
I
law provisions for lot ITontage and lot area requirements, and the intended use complies
with the relevant zoning provisions under the Economic Development permitted uses.
Recommendation
It is recommended that Consent Application B-5/02 be granted subject to the standard list
of conditions.
Decision
BE IT RESOLVED that:
Moved by, Dave Edwards seconded by Ken Robbins
"That the Committee hereby GRANT Application B-5/02 subject to the following
conditions:
1. That the Township ofOro-Medonte Building Department approves of the
application, in writing.
2. That three copies of a Reference Plan of the subject lands prepared by an
Ontario Land Surveyor be submitted to the Committee Secretary or
appropriate registerable description.
3. That three copies of deeds be submitted to the Committee Secretary to be
stamped using Form 2 as prescribed in the Planning Act.
4. That all Municipal taxes be paid to the Municipality.
5. That the conditions of consent imposed by the Committee be fulfilled within
one year ITom the date of giving of this notice.
.....Carried"
2
j
-
te9'~~
".
..
-..
~!
~~
....
.....
-
~
~
~
,..,\~
""~
\:X)
I< -....
-a ~~
~o
.....
..
~
'i~
\~
~
30-1
)
)
\
i~~
\;)>
,:X)
.......
:I'I'\~.f:o.
~
-
~
.
Committee of Adjustment
Planning Report
February 14,2002
Lyle and Sharon Johnston
B-4/02
Con 9, South Part Lot 1 (former Ora)
The Proposal
The purpose of application B-4/02 is to permit the creation of a new residential lot. The
new lot is proposed to have a lot frontage of 53.3 metres (175 feet), a lot depth of 113.8
metres (373.37 feet) and a lot area of 0.6 hectares (1.5 acres). The land proposed to be
retained would a lot frontage of 340 metres (1115.90 feet), a lot depth of 774.5 metres
(2540.86 feet) and a lot area of 43.3 hectares (106.96 acres).
Policy
Official Plan Designation:
Zoning By-law:
Rural, Agricultural
Agricultural/Rural (A/RU) and Environmental Protection
Exception 76 (EP*76) Zone
Comments
Roads Superintendent:
Building Department:
existing drive needs driveway pipe
No concerns
Planning Department Comments
Official Plan
The subject property is designated Rural and Agricultural the Township's Official Plan. The
proposed severance is located in the area designated agricultural. The proposed consent would
therefore be subject to the policies of Section D2. The specific policies related to the
creation of new lots for non-agricultural purposes are found in Section D2.3.2 and D2.3.3.
Section D2.3.2 specifically indicates that the creation of new lots for residential purposes
shall generally not be pennitted unless the lot is intended for use by a retiring bona fide
farmer or is considered an infilling lot in accordance with the Official Plan policies. The
Committee should verify that the applicant meets the definition of a bona fide fanner to
comply with the Official Plan policy requirements.
1
Zoning By-law
The subject property is zoned AgriculturallRural (AlRU) and Environmental Protection
Exception 76 (EP*76) in the Township's Zoning By-law 97-95, as amended. Both the
proposed and retained lots would appear to comply with the Zoning By-law provisions
for lot frontage and lot area requirements and the proposed lot has no effect on the
Environmental Protection Zone.
Recommendation
It is recommended that Consent Application B-4/02 be DEFFERED until clarification
can be determined on whether or not the applicants can conform with the OfficJal Plan
Policies.
BE IT RESOLVED that:
Moved by, Ken Robbins seconded by Joe Charles
"That the Committee hereby DENIES Application B-4/02 as the applicant does not
conform with the Township's Official Plan policies.
.. ...Carried"
2
:L I ~
. "I~~~
.055 r' .
. ~~~
~~
Zz.
SIB
0. h.
- 0
"' .0 a
...J 0
-I' I"- ~ -.J
z
J.. ;:; '=-
:) z
0 '>.J
W
~ ~ ~
" JI: ~
_ 'b w "-
o z
.tJ ~~ ~
S1B(D4<S)
~IW
t');;;
,......
Inz
o
w
"
z
~I~
E~
t')
z
SIB(ZUWO)
N59' 30'50"
0\
\;
551.44'
x
?
871.49' OLD SNN<E RAIl " POST " WIRE FENCE
\
N59"14'10"E
II
rC\O~
/ ~-..J
Gv~'
GO~
x
j(
SSl9(ZUIoIO) N59'38'45"E(U)
FENCE
5.5' S
INST No 312008
PART
998.72'
N59' 37' 3o:E('P'i)
NEW POST " WIRE FENCE
y
~
895.54'
N 1/2 OF W 1/2 OF LOT 1
N59" 48'50" E '
785.69'
SIB
S 1/2 OF HI 1/2 OF LOr 1
18
~
~ ~, ~
~ <) ...,
~....1 .
fI..... ..... ......
:3 7.3.37/./
1
LOT 1
SSlB(ZUIIO) 25<40.86'
~;c~ LOT 2
0-
<:
, r
~ ~, V
,';., V
'~t., It..
~ ~ l~~ "I t
~ ~
Ci r-<I. I.-'J '() <...:
~ 'U
~ ) ~.~ ~
-t
{ ~ ~c V7~V) It..
~'r~ '.., ~
<:! ". ,. ,,)I. h
n1 ~II{ .~ ';'" ~ It..
D NC
0) \b<:
01 P')~
D <: %
a ~ 'C:
~._CX)
tn.:...
~ ~\ ~'. ":t
l'j~ ~ c:::
'<~ ":t
rt..!'Q ~~ c:
\J Q:
'-S\ S-E CORNER
LOT 1 CON 9
90.70'
SIB(ZUIIO)
Committee of Adjustment
Planning Report
February 14,2002
!
Roger Vernon Holliday and Dorothy Ruth Holliday
B-6/02
Con 1, Part Lots 14 &15 (former Orillia)
The Proposal
The purpose of application B-6/02 is a technical severance to re-create two parcels of
land which were previously separate. The new lot (lot 15) is proposed to have a lot area
of approximately 10.9 hectares (27 acres). The land proposed to be retained (lot 14)
would have a lot area of approximately 10.5 hectares (26 acres).
Policy
Official Plan Designation:
Zoning By-law:
Restricted Rural, Environmental Protection Two Overlay
AgriculturalJRural (A/RU) and Environmental Protection
(EP) Zone
Comments
Roads Superintendent:
Building Department:
No concerns
No concerns
Planning Department Comments
Official Plan
The subject property is designated Restricted Rural and Environmental Protection Two
Overlay in
the Township's Official Plan. The proposed consent would permit the creation of a lot
where two lots had merged on title and is subject to the Policies of Section D.II.3.
The creation of a new lots to correct a situation where two or more lots have merged on
title may be pennitted, provided the CoIt1ll1ittee of Adjustment is satisfied that the new
lot:
a) was once separate conveyable lot in accordance with the Planning Act;
b) is of the same shape and size as the lot which once existed as a separate
conveyable lot;
c) can be adequately serviced by on-site sewage and water systems;
d) fronts on a public road that is maintained year-round by a public authority;
1
e) an entrance pennit is available for the new driveway accessing the severed
lot from the appropriate authority, if required; and
Both the severed and retained parcels have access to year round Township and Ministry of
Transportation maintained roads. Both parcels will continue to be utilized for agricultural
and residential purposes. Committee should satisfy themselves on whether or not this was
an original or whole lot within the Township as required by subsections A and B to
detennine confonnity with the policies ofthe Official Plan
Zoning By-law
The subject property is zoned Agricultural/Rural (AlRU) and Environmental Protection
(EP) in the Township's Zoning By-law 97-95, as amended. Both the proposed and
retained lots would appear to comply with the Zoning By-law provisions for lot frontage
and lot area requirements.
Recommendation
It is recommended that Consent Application B-6/02 be DEFFERED until clarification
can be detennined on whether or not the applicants can confonn with the Official Plan
Policies.
Decision
BE IT RESOLVED that:
Moved by, Dave Edwards seconded by Joe Charles
"That the Committee hereby DEFER Application B-6/02 until clarification can be
detennined on whether or not the applicants can confonn with the Official Plan Policies.
.. ...Carried"
2
~/.
1-.
I'-
I
1
~
SUBJECT SITE
.
\
">,t S$ CV':>
.:;y ~
?C)
""1'11 0Nt
liltl~'l'"
. :.~........-,
~.~,
" -,',. ~~~~1!'-',.~~,t-:':7:~~,"'"
I
I
. . I
S;:..I
.. ,.;1
. .... !
I
. !
~1I\O'5'
I
I
I
I
I
(
1J~.'~lt r, !U
I' i /JV. .1,'
,V
Committee of Adjustment
Planning Report
February 14,2002
Robert and Jacqueline Nunn
B-J/02
Con 1, East Part of Lot 14 (former Oro)
The Proposal
The applicant is proposing a boundary adjustment. The land to be conveyed has a lot
frontage of 30.02 metres (98.5 feet), a lot depth of 61 metres (200.13 feet), and lot area of
0.1831 hectares (0.45 acres). The land to be retained would have a lot area of 19.8
hectares (48.95 acres). The boundary adjustment would permit Trans Canada to have
take-offs for the sales metres station located on the same lands as the existing pipeline.
Policy
Official Plan Designation:
Zoning By-law:
Rural Residential
Rural Residential One Exception 23 (RURl *23) Zone
Comments
Roads Superintendent:
Building Department:
No concerns
No concerns
Planning Department Comments
Official Plan
The subject property is designated Rural Residential in the Township's Official Plan.
The intent of the Rural Residential policies is to recognize existing estate, country estate
and chalet residential developments in the Township. All development within the Rural
Residential designation shall occur by way of Plan of Subdivision/Condominium.
The application appears to meet all the requirements within the Township's Official Plan
as the subject property is the site of a Draft Plan of Subdivision.
Zonin2 By-law
The subject property is zoned Rural Residential One Exception 23 (RURl *23) in the
Township's Zoning By-law 97-95, as amended. Both the proposed and retained lots
would appear to comply with the Zoning By-law provisions.
1
/
en 1'L,
'v. 'JV
'DI/;;
Recommendation
It is recommended that Consent Application B-l/02 be Granted subject to the standard
list of conditions.
Decision
BE IT RESOLVED that:
Moved by, Albert Pross seconded by Joe Charles
"That the Committee hereby GRANT Application B-l/02 subject to the following
conditions:
1. That the Township ofOro-Medonte Building Department approves of the
application, in writing.
2. That three copies of a Reference Plan of the subject lands prepared by an
Ontario Land Surveyor be submitted to the Committee Secretary or
appropriate registerable description.
3. That three copies of deeds be submitted to the Committee Secretary to be
stamped using Form 2 as prescribed in the Planning Act.
4. That all Municipal taxes be paid to the Municipality.
5. That the conditions of consent imposed by the Committee be fulfilled within
one year from the date of giving of this notice.
.. ...Carried"
2
~
e
/\(
/ tf(Ji
"
y-+-
'"
~
.$
~
~~
<.0
~
\.0- 5
or- (;1
'c:i 1..)
~~ b
...t . .~
...- u.J CJ 0
-0: e
tn ~.o 'r5 ';::~~
...-... '0. :;Ji..ii!
I Q... '=' ~ i;a.
O:z:g,;_W ..-:.;
""- .:J 0 'if, ~ 8 ~;;,':;
q - i - ~ .~~~
~ \5 ~ ~ % V't ~ ~.~
~ u.J ~ ~ ~ ~~,~
~ r- (..) ~ ~ 1:: '5~'"
<;;> p:::, "'Z- ~ F z:. . v'
~40(5r-,B
tt0-0~zV
,2001
t
~
..
-
~~
..........-.
t'.i""
....-
, , .
t ~
~ -
it ..,
.;>.
~i
\':,: 'j,E\
-:f6 '~r d ~3. '\.
e
'n:':"i-V-:,': .-;\ \f'-;D~~ f' \ P't\_ 1 HE
"
:)
b 0
.... ~
V'
~.~
t.,';o\
\ :>v
~ '
.. .>
'rt ..)
'i2 -\
\ }
..' 6>
~p
7 ..
co..
gr::- \~
..n
-" ..> ~\
,..101
)t..:C
~.t~
S NO ,S5]:) NOJ
e
r" \ '') ~y
\.... jir- .~:i \
" i" 1.;
/ V..J - -
u i;U, .::,,:.4
Of;)1 (\ 1
~
.::;J Co
~ ~
:~
0' ...;
" ~
~ ~
~ v
.., 'j\70"S'727i::C,:,E,
rb
ft~t\\
~ ~ ~\~:~.~
~ Ir . ~'<>'8
,\i ; ~~;\~
"'l \ ~ \ ~~
". \~:.;. \.
'.i'i~' \
:Ii _ ::(
i ~ Of'\
=0\ ~ .
.1. !I ~ ~~
' v_s'." ~
~"... ," ~
. i!\ \ "~1
\\\ \' \~
fiw. t ~\
1
,
\
~
i
'6
f
.1 \ ~
. ~'" ;( I
e ,'" ~
i ~.~ ~
" ~ ~
a,' \~ e
...~
. '"'
""v
&/ .
~.., ...t'
.... -'
Q
~~\ ; \
~~~ . L ~~
'~~~ 2 ·
~~l ~ ~. \ ~j~~
i~ . i<"i \ . ~ ~~~~. '"
i~\.il \i ~~~e~l!~'( .~.
_~i ,-~ i--;~~i,l~ ~
~. . Q ~ ~. I "" ,~ ~ \,..
V!! It ':ilC:>~' u.~~!;'" ~ ." p
':o.'t$~ t;,~<l>~:;''''~''''v. t ~ {.;
\" .~ ~m%2~~~i~~~~ ~
~~ ';: ~~,C~C~~~~~~~~~ ~ .
~ ~ ';.~~ l~ ~'i~\~\' 0 i
~~ ~~ 0 ~.,.~ CCO ~O'" . C'1.
. .. z . ?,
I' ..1 ..~ ~ · .' t 1 ~ ~ -
g "" ~ ':I .p:.,.~,"~"k~'-'O. V' -
. . \. .
"
\ '"
r! ,. . .
\'I33M'~~ Q'lfOCl. ClO.:l
" \
\ ,~
""
..:.
3?N~~O~\'J
.4
...
..
9
~!
~ 9t'\! :..----
u.v c-. It .
'JI'~-
iJ
~ r\)\ .. ....,...
(MI<<) I' "" ..cc'" \ \ ~,
(..u'~'O' \ ..
. i"" II
\ 1116 \!
.~ "\'~ \'
.....;.............~\..,........
.' ""i ..,'" ". .
"A ' '.
~: \ .~1\ ~\
o ~ .1 ... .
~J. '\\ ~Jl "" ;.
0- . ~i -,~\ \ 'f ~ \Z
~... \ \I -t ~. ~,:',
'o~ 10. '!C. ~.~
1'"1/.
:\ \? ~\ \
;. ~.. ~
..,,_ \.': W.
:.; \ .' ~ il
!~.,\. ~~..\ .'
.... .
.If C .
..
....
60/1)098 .':>~;;{/ It. ~oo.\ \. ,,0; tt
()5; .OS:
~
----._~
, .
. .....
.-.....
.,.,
~
\,~,
f)'
\~
......,
,f .
,~,
\('1
f\')
..,.,
en
...
.-
N
(\
{i'-l
\ ~~ .
I ~"
\ ... o!
.. ..,..\\~..
:,\ .
2\
0-\
i
" \
.\
\
\
. \
k!
H.~(,o.l \..~~ ' \ ,-
.\ '
/ . .'
!. . \ .
...s
~
a
!" <:1
UJ <:1
r or
fIJ 0&)
.~
tt')
(~'.
.~
...
Z
<:>
~
h')
V'
~)
,"
~ -.
, .
.:.
~:
i
'..'l:
~~;.
-
~ \ to '
.:!:: \ 'y, \ .!~, .~\ ~ \'~
'!, .~ ::'; . .~ tl \
..' .,' " 10 ~ .
_ .. \c.... on '$
.~. ' . " -~ .~ ~
~
t
~.
,~
r:)
:!'
- ~
~ ~,
~oJ
"<:J
~;,