05 21 2003 Council Agenda
TOWNSHIP OF ORO,~EDONTE
COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
DATE: WEDNESDAY, May 21, 2003
TIME: 6:00 P.M.
............... ... ............ ............ ...... ... ....................................... ...............
1. OPENING OF MEETING BY THE MAYOR
2. PRA YERlCONTEMPLA TION/REFLECTION
3. NOTICE OF ADDITIONS:
4. ADOPTION OF AGENDA:
5. "DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST AND THE GENERAL NATURE
THEREOF - IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ACT"
6. MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETINGS:
a) Minutes of Council Meeting of May 7,2003.
7. RECOGNITION OF ACHIEVEMENTS:
a) Recognition of Chad Robinson's Certificate of Competency for complying with
the requirements under Regulation 435/93 for the Utility Operator Licensing
Program in Water Distribution System. (Operator-in-Training).
8. PUBLIC MEETINGS:
a) 6:00 p.m. Public Meeting re: Draft Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency
Services Master Plan (previously circulated).
b) 7:20 p.m. Public Meeting re: Concession 10, South West % Lot 23
(formerly within the Township of Medonte), File P-150/03.
c) 7:30 p.m. Public Meeting re: Concession 5, Part East % of West % Lot
10 (formerly within the Township of Medonte), File P-151/03.
d) 7:40 p.m. Public Meeting re: Concession 3, West Part Lot 11 (formerly
within the Township of Oro), File P-149/03.
e) 7:50 p.m. Public Meeting re: Comprehensive Development Plan for the
Horseshoe Valley Village Designation (previously circulated).
9. DEPUTATIONS:
None.
10. CONSENT AGENDA CORRESPONDENCE:
'}
a) Oro-Medonte Chamber of Commerce, correspondence dated May 14, 2003
re: 2003 Operating Grant Letter of Appreciation.
11. MOTIONS FOR WHICH NOTICE HAS BEEN GIVEN:
None.
12. REPORTS OF MUNICIPAL OFFICERS:
a) Report No. EES 2003-032, Keith Mathieson, Director of Engineering and
Environmental Services, re: Terra Ridge Developments Inc., - Subdivision
Agreement Part of the East Half of Lot 14, Concession 1, Designated as Parts
1, 3, 4, 5 and 6, Plan 51 R-22770, Save and Except Parts 1, 2 and 3, Plan
51 R-30901, Being all of PIN # 58544-0115 (U) [Refer to 16c, By-law No.
2003-046 re: Schedule "A"].
b) Report No. EES 2003-033, Keith Mathieson, Director of Engineering and
Environmental Services, re: Beard's Farm Supply Limited - Site Plan
Agreement Part of the East Half of Lot 1, Concession 11, Being Part 3, 51 R-
12482 and Part 1, Plan 51R-18249, Being all of PIN # 58529-0113 (Lt) [Refer
to 16f, By-law No. 2003-049 re: Appendix "A"].
13. REPORTS OF COMMITTEES:
a) Minutes of the Committee of the Whole Meeting, May 14, 2003.
b) Minutes of the Oro-Medonte Recreation Advisory Committee Meeting,
May 12, 2003.
14. COMMUNICATIONS:
a) Councillor Paul Marshall, re: Request to Waive Fee, Oro African Church,
Dedication, June 15, 2003.
b) Mr. Jorge Bartolo, correspondence re: Questions Regarding Water Rates.
c) Municipality of Chatham-Kent, correspondence dated May 5,2003 re:
Incarceration of Criminals Convicted of First Degree Murder in Minimum
Security Facilities.
d) Association of Ontario Road Supervisors, invitation received May 14, 2003 re:
2003 Municipal Trade Show, June 4 and 5, 2003, Lindsay Recreation
Complex (registration deadline May 23, 2003).
e) City of Pickering, correspondence dated May 5, 2003 re: Ontario Regulation
154/03 Filed Under the Planning Act, Order Made Pursuant to The Ontario
Planning & Development Act, 1994.
f) Mr. Wm. Stonkus, correspondence dated May 6, 2003 re: 220 Acres; Lot 4
and 3, Concession 7, Oro-Medonte.
g) The Corporation of the Township of Springwater, correspondence re: Notice
of the Adoption of an Amendment to the Official Plan of the Township of
Springwater, Mertz Official Plan Amendment No. 15.
15. IN-CAMERA:
None.
16.BY-LAWS:
a) By-law No. 2003-043 Being a By-law to Adopt the Estimates of all Amounts
Required During the Year and for Levying the Tax
Rates for the Year 2003.
b) By-law No. 2003-045 Being a By-law to Amend By-law No. 2002-141,
Being a By-law to Appoint By-law Inspectors.
c) By-law No. 2003-046 Being a By-law to Authorize the Execution of a
Subdivision Agreement Between The Corporation of
the Township of Oro-Medonte and Terra Ridge
Developments Inc.
d) By-law No. 2003-047 Being a By-law to Authorize the Execution of a Pre-
Service Agreement 2008628 Ontario Ltd. (Diamond
Valley Estates).
e) By-law No. 2003-048 Being a By-law to Authorize the Execution of a
Contract between the Township of Oro-Medonte and
the Barrie Public Library Board for a Term of One
Year.
f) By-law No. 2003-049 Being a By-law to Authorize the Execution of a Site
Plan Control Agreement Between The Corporation of
The Township of Oro-Medonte and Beard's Farm
Supply Limited.
17. CONFIRMATION BY-LAW NO. 2003-044
18. QUESTIONS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS:
19. ADJOURNMENT:
~.
ADDENDUM
COUNCIL MEETING
Wednesday, May 21,2003
14. COMMUNICATIONS:
h) Ministry of Citizenship, invitation received May 16, 2003, re: 2003 Senior of the
Year Awards (deadline June 30, 2003).
Innovative Pers
P.O Box 2112,
Orillia, Ontario L3V
April 16, 2003
To:
Mayor and Council
The Township of Oro-Medonte
From:
Julie Scott
Innovative Perspectives
Subject:
Fire and Emergency Services Department Master Pia
DRAFT Documents
Please find attached the DRAFT Analysis and Recommendation do
the Fire and Emergency Services Department Master Plan.
In preparation for my presentation to the Committee of the Whole on April 23, it
may be helpful for you to review this material in the following order. The key or
summary documents are:
. Analysis Overview
. Analysis of Needs Summary
. Risk Analysis Summary
. Recommendations
The supporting documents are the Risk Analysis by Station for stations 1-6
(which also includes the Fire Prevention Public Education and Staffing
summaries) and the Analysis of Needs Chart. These can be used as reference
materials along with the background data (provided earlier by the Deputy Chief)
in the Master Plan binder.
It has been a pleasure to work with on this project with the Fire and Emergency
Services Department and other municipal staff, and I look forward to presenting
these documents on the 23rd.
Sincerely,
/ j
(jJ.tfle Scott
Innovative Perspectives
Attachments
Providing services in Human Resources Development and Performance
Voice (705) 325-6859 Fax (705) 325-0572 e-mail
"
Fire and Emergency Services Department
Master Plan
Recommendations
This document is presented in four components. The Recommendations were
developed by a working committee that consisted of the Chief, Deputy Chief and
the Consultant, who also lead the Analysis portion of the Master Plan.
The four components are:
1. Recommendations for Bylaws and SOG's (page 2)
Recommendations focus on Municipal by-laws and Standard Operating
Guidelines that direct the day-to-day management and operations of the
Fire & Emergency Services Department.
2. Recommendations Emanating from The Risk Analysis and
The Analysis of Needs (pages 3-12)
References the ten categories assessed in The Risk Analysis and
addresses the needs identified in The Gap Analysis. The categories are:
· Community
. Growth
· Emergency Response
. Fire Stations
. Water
. Roads
. Communications
. Tourism
· Fire Prevention and Public Education
. Staffing
3. Prioritized Summary (page 13)
Provides a listing of the recommendations in prioritized sequence.
4. Financial and Human Resource Implications Summary
(page 14)
Highlights the recommendations that will impact capital forecasts and
human resources requirements.
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Master Plan - Recommendations
DRAFT April 3, 2003
COMMUNITY
Residential, commercial, industrial, institutional and assembly occupancies were
addressed through the background data collection and analysis process. It was
determined that although the minimum required inspections are being performed
(e.g. schools, community halls, hotels and those by request or complaint) this is
based on the previous requirements up to and including 2001. In 2002 there
were adjustments and enhancements made to the guidelines regarding the
minimum standards (e.g. fireground staffing and Fire Prevention and Public
Education requirements). These changes will have to be addressed to ensure
the minimum level of service is now being met and will continue to be met in the
future.
It is recommended:
1. That the Corporation determine its' options when establishing the level of
service to be provided by the Fire and Emergency Services Department.
This determination should include, but not be limited to the assessment of
the following information:
. Risk Analysis by Station e.g. response times, station versus incident
proximity etc.
. Fire Protection and Prevention Act (which includes OFM)
. Guidelines regarding Fire Prevention and Public Education
. Budgetary considerations e.g. business case
2. That the Corporation give consideration to a business registration or
licensing process to identify new and ongoing commercial and industrial
activity in the community. This would provide an information base and
assist the Fire & Emergency Services Department in determining
response needs relative to these types of activities.
Reference:
Risk Analysis Summary of Analysis by Station page 4
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Master Plan - Recommendations
DRAFT April 3, 2003
3
,
GROWTH
2001 Census data indicates a 9% increase in Oro-Medonte population since
1996. The actual and projected economic and community growth of the
Township highlights the need to continually monitor these trends and their impact
on the Fire and Emergency Services Department.
It is recommended:
That the data compilation and tracking systems developed for this document,
continue to be maintained to ensure currency of essential information regarding
growth and it's impact on the Fire and Emergency Services Department. This
information would include, but not be limited to:
· Emergency Response effectiveness and efficiencies based on the
Risk Analysis
· Fire Prevention and Public Education Programs
· Planning and Development
. Aging Population
. Personnel Training
· Apparatus and equipment
· Infrastructure (water, roads etc)
. Seasonal residents
· Cost per capita and activity based costing
. Tourism
Reference:
Risk Analysis Summary of Analysis by Station pages 6
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Master Plan - Recommendations
DRAFT April 3, 2003
4
EMERGENCY RESPONSE
During the collection of background data for this Master Plan, a comprehensive
digital tracking system was developed to determine the emergency response
capabilities and limitations of the Fire & Emergency Services Department.
Through this process, efficiencies and deficiencies were identified which
highlighted the usefulness of the tracking system for monitoring future activity.
It is recommended:
That the monitoring process, continue to be updated to include any future
enhancements to the digital tracking system and to ensure that this essential
information is kept current.
Reference:
Risk Analysis Summary page 6
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Master Plan - Recommendations
DRAFT April 3, 2003
5
FIRE STATIONS
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services has five fire stations that are
generally well situated for the response areas they serve. The sixth fire station in
Moonstone is considered to be inadequate and poorly located. Through the Risk
Analysis process, it was determined that some stations have long distances to
travel for a large percentage of their calls, while other stations have difficulty with
personnel availability. These factors, combined with the actual and projected
economic and community growth, have highlighted the need for an additional
station.
It is recommended:
1. That the Moonstone Fire Station be considered for relocation in 2004 and
that the 5 year capital forecast be amended accordingly.
2. That the 5 year capital forecast be amended to accommodate the
upgrades identified in the Risk Analysis by Station and the Analysis of
Needs with regard to station improvements.
3. That the long range strategy for the delivery of Fire and Emergency
Services include an amendment to the 5 year capital forecast for the
allocation of provisions for the construction of an additional Fire Station at
Line 7 North and Highway 11.
Reference:
Risk Analysis Summary page 7
Analysis of Needs Chart pages 12 through 15
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Master Plan - Recommendations
DRAFT April 3, 2003
6
WATER SUPPLY
Fire protection water supply is a component of the Fire and Emergency Services
that requires review and ongoing monitoring. As with other natural resources,
the quantity of water for this purpose needs to be taken into consideration when
assessing the impact of economic and community growth. Through the Risk
Analysis portion of this Master Plan the need for a more in depth strategy
highlighted. This will require the department to pursue a variety of options to
ensure that an adequate supply of water for fire protection is available for the
future.
It is recommended:
1. That the fire protection water supply strategy and mapping be enhanced to
ensure there is an adequate year round water supply throughout the
township.
2. That the Public Works Department develop procedures to ensure hydrants
are cleared and maintained to the appropriate standards.
3. That formalized agreements be made with the cities of Barrie and Orillia
for the use of their border hydrant systems.
4. That locations be identified for the installation of dry hydrants where
appropriate, and that the 5 year capital forecast be amended to include
provisions for the installation of these dry hydrants.
5. That the Fire and Emergency Services Department identify potential
partnerships with private land owners for use of water for the purpose of
fire protection throughout the township. Partnership agreements should
include but not be limited to:
. Source accessibility
· Year round volume/flow rate availability e.g. dry hydrants
· Station response requirement (e.g. water availability and
associated risks etc.)
· Ministry of Natural Resources and other authorization
· Consultation with agencies e.g. school boards
· Consultation with private industry
Reference:
Risk Analysis Summary page 7
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Master Plan - Recommendations
DRAFT April 3, 2003
7
ROADS
Throughout the Master Plan analysis process, roads were reviewed with regard
to incident response time and potential risks with regard to the delivery of fire and
emergency services.
It is recommended:
1. That the Public Works Department 5 year capital forecast be amended in
2003 to include provisions for the opening of Windfield Drive.
2. That in conjunction with Public Works, the Fire and Emergency Services
Department, review the feasibility of connecting Simcoeside to the Village
of Hawkestone and the extension of Line 1 to Ridge Road.
3. That the corporation continues to allocate funds toward the upgrading of
un-assumed roads as it relates to Fire and Emergency Services protection
for the community.
4. That the corporation advise all private roadway associations of the
required road maintenance standards with regard to Fire and Emergency
Services protection for their communities.
5. That the Fire and Emergency Services Department identify the roads
within the Township where response times are hindered due to street/road
name confusion, and that staff be authorized to bring forward a report with
it's recommendations to resolve these issues.
6. That the corporation be encouraged to keep communications open with
the Province and the County of Simcoe with regard to capital projects as it
relates to their road networks.
Reference:
Risk Analysis Summary page 5
Risk Analysis By Station pages 11,12 or 13
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Master Plan - Recommendations
DRAFT April 3, 2003
8
COMMUNICATIONS
During the data collection and analysis process it was determined that there were
two areas of concern regarding communications. They are: the use of 4 party
party-lines and their lack of efficiency within the enhanced 9-1-1 service, and the
pager and radio response pocket issues (which will be addressed through
Industry Canada Spectrum Re-deployment Plan effective January, 2004).
It is recommended:
1. That when studies on the Spectrum Management Communication
System are completed, recommendations be presented to Council for
final approval.
2. That the Corporation should lobby the County of Simcoe to contact Bell
Canada in order to change all 4 party party-lines within the Township
to private lines, to ensure that they are capable of interfacing with the
enhanced 9-1-1- service.
3. That the Corporation (as an interim measure) provide these users with
alternate emergency numbers which would be promoted through the
corporation newsletter, tax bills and website etc.
Reference:
Risk Analysis Summary page 8
Ora-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Master Plan - Recommendations
DRAFT April 3, 2003
9
TOURISM
With the Township and Lake Country's promotion of this area as a year round
vacation destination, it is important to continue to measure the impact of this
tourism activity on the Fire and Emergency Services Department.
It is recommended:
That the Fire and Emergency Services Department continue to monitor, assess
and adapt to the effects of the increased road traffic, water activities and
numbers of transient visitors to and through the Township of Oro-Medonte,
Reference:
Risk Analysis Summary page 8
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Master Plan - Recommendations
DRAFT April 3, 2003
10
FIRE PREVENTION AND PUBLIC EDUCATION
An important component of the support structure required to assist the
department in preventing incidents, is a sound Fire Prevention and Public
Education Program. In order to meet the needs of a growing Municipality and the
requirements of the Fire Protection and Prevention Act, it is important to embrace
the concept of a proactive vs. reactive approach to public safety.
It is recommended:
1. That a Fire Prevention and Public Education Policy be developed to
comply with the Fire Protection and Prevention Act and that Ministry
Guidelines 02-04-23 and 04-45-12 be addressed through the Establishing
and Regulating by-law.
2. That a Fire Prevention and Public Education Program be developed and
implemented. This program would include, but not be limited to:
. Inspections
· Plans review and other compliances
· Promotion of learning programs that monitor, educate and attempt
to prevent incidents where behaviour and habits can be modified
and/or influenced.
· Promotion of pre-planning and preparedness programs e.g. Pre-
incident Surveys
Reference:
Risk Analysis Summary page 8
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Master Plan - Recommendations
DRAFT April 3, 2003
11
STAFFING
Through the development of the background information for the Fire and
Emergency Services Master Plan, there have been several enhancements to
best business practices and support systems for the department. As well, the
team has identified components within the department that are essential to
providing an appropriate level of service, and recommendations are provided
throughout this document to review and establish levels of service that will meet
the Fire Protection and Prevention Act. Following the establishment of a level of
service, consideration should be given to the impact on the human resources
component with regard to staffing compliment.
It is recommended:
That the Director of the Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department
(through the CAO) bring forward a comprehensive staffing report for the approval
of Council.
Reference:
Risk Analysis Summary page 8
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Master Plan - Recommendations
DRAFT April 3, 2003
12
PRIORITY SUMMARY
Outlined below is the suggested priority sequence for implementation of
recommendations.
High Priority - Short Term
. Determine Level of Service
. Review Staffing Needs
. Relocation of Moonstone Fire Station
. Road openings
. Road name modifications
High Priority - Long Term
. New Fire Station on Line 7 North at Highway 11
. Business Registration Program
Operational
. Fire Protection Water Strategy
. Communications issues
. Fire Station upgrades
. Growth related monitoring and strategies
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Master Plan - Recommendations
DRAFT April 3, 2003
13
.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS SUMMARY
It is recommended:
That the 5 year capital forecast be amended to address the recommendations
under:
· Community - impact due to changes in level of service
· Growth, Emergency Response and Tourism - costs associated with data
collection and maintenance
· Emergency Response - costs associated future enhancements
· Fire Stations - costs associated with upgrades and construction
· Fire Protection Water Supply - costs associated with upgrades
. Roads - costs associated with upgrades
· Communications - costs associated with upgrades
· Fire Prevention & Public Education - costs associated with programs
· Staffing - costs associated with implementation of Human Resources
Development Strategy.
HUMAN RESOURCE IMPLICATIONS SUMMARY
It is recommended:
That consideration be given to the impact on regular human resources and
staffing hours, as a result of the following:
· By-laws and SOG development and amendments
· Community - determination of level of service and business
registrationllicensing
· Growth, Emergency Response and Tourism - data maintenance and
monitoring
· Water Supply - development and implementation of strategy
· Fire Prevention & Public Education - development and implementation of
programs
· Staffing - development of Human Resources Development Strategy
DRAFT UPDATE........APRIL 3, 2003
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Master Plan - Recommendations
DRAFT April 3, 2003
14
Analysis Overview
The Analysis for the Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Master Plan is in two parts.
· Analysis of Needs (Summary and Chart)
· Risk Analysis (Summary and "By Station" Breakdown)
These sections provide insight into the strengths and weaknesses of the department and
lay the groundwork for planning strategies and other requirements, based on the growth
of the municipality and the areas of potential risks.
The Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department has compiled
comprehensive background information regarding its services, using the "Guidelines on
Municipal Fire Protection" as set out by the Ministry of Public Safety and Security.
Where there was a lack of guideline or a guideline that did not apply to this department,
additions and omissions were made using common sense and good reasoning.
Through this process, the requirements of the terms of reference for this Master Plan
have been addressed and the document gives a clear and accurate picture of the
department's current situation. The historical data represented in this Master Plan
covers a period of 5 years 1997 - 2001 inclusive. This ensures that "spikes" in statistics
were neutralized and also provides a 5 year database for future monitoring of services
for effectiveness and efficiencies.
Following the compilation of data, a Working Committee was formed to review and
analyze the information. The committee consisted of the Chief, Deputy Chief, Research
Assistant (who also worked on the background compilation) and two members from the
Office of the Fire Marshal. The process was facilitated by me, Julie Scott of Innovative
Perspectives; the independent consultant that was contracted to carry out the analysis.
My observations:
With an administrative team consisting of the Chief, Deputy Chief and Technical Support
Person; all of the management responsibilities for the Fire and Emergencies Services
Department are carried out from the headquarters on Line 4 North at Horseshoe Valley
Road. Generally speaking, the department is an efficient and effective operation,
however there is an urgent need for additional full time support in the areas of Training
and Development, and Fire Prevention and Public Education.
The six fire stations located throughout the township, provide protection through a
volunteer fire fighting staff of 94 as of 2001 (approximately 16 per station) including
District Fire Chiefs, Captains, and Trainers/Facilitators for each station. With an average
response time (including all types of calls) 1997 - 2001 of 11 minutes 57 seconds, the
volunteer personnel carry out their responsibilities in a timely and efficient manner.
Most of the stations are well situated and are generally in good condition, however the
township will have to address the inadequate condition and location of the Moonstone
Station.
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department Master Plan - Analysis Overview 1
Draft April 3.03
The increased number of incidents along the Highway 11 corridor has had a significant
impact on the Shanty Bay and Hawkestone Stations. Based on the statistical data
gathered for this Master Plan, there is a definite need for a new fire station to be located
close to highway 11, and centrally situated. E.g. Line 7 North
The Risk Analysis portion provides information regarding the properties and areas of the
township that have a higher rate of incident or present a potentially higher level of risk
with regard to loss of life and property. This "station by station" breakdown emphasizes
the need for the department to enhance the support mechanisms that will ensure the
continued effectiveness of the Fire and Emergency Services Department. Fire
Prevention Public Education, and Training and Development are two such areas.
While compiling the comprehensive background information, the department also put in
place many highly effective tracking systems that have already provided efficiencies in
monitoring the level of service and producing the related reports and documents.
These systems were developed using historical data from 1997 - 2001, and the Chief
and Deputy Chief have already reaped the benefits of this data base, through their ability
to quickly access computerized information that was previously only available to them in
manual form e.g. incident response analysis, personnel and training records etc. This
has also provided the Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department with a
technological edge that will soon be required under a new efficiencies program
(Municipal Fire Protection Information Survey) currently being carried out through the
Office of the Fire Marshal.
In conclusion:
It has been my pleasure to work on this project with Paul Eenhoorn as Chief, Joe Casey
as Deputy Chief, Harold Daynard as Research and Technology Assistant and Lynn
Burness as Technical Support Person. In my sessions with this core group, as well as
the Volunteer Fire Fighters, I found a group of dedicated men and women who are
committed to the safety of their community. I would like to acknowledge their
enthusiasm and input into the development of the Master Plan. Finally, I would like to
thank the Master Plan Steering Committee and also the Township Administration Staff
for providing their support and assistance to me throughout my involvement in this
project.
Respectfully submitted by:
Julie Scott
Innovative Perspectives.
DRAFT ONLY..........UPDATED April 3, 2003
Fire and Emergency Services Department Master Plan - Analysis Overview 2
Draft April 3.03
Analysis of Needs Summary
The Analysis of Needs document identifies areas where the Fire and Emergency
Department has met, exceeded or has a gap regarding:
· Standards
· legislation or guidelines
· Procedures or best practices
. level of service
In order to develop criteria for analyzing the data, the working committee chose a format
that would provide a basis for comparison. Because the Ministry Guidelines were used as
the basis for gathering the data, it was decided that the same document would be
appropriate as the baseline comparator. In addition, the following standards, legislation
and bylaws were used:
Federal Legislation
· Criminal Code
· Canada Explosives Act
· Industry Canada Radio Standards
Provincial Legislation
· Ministry of labour
· Ministry of Transportation
· Workplace Safety and Insurance Act
· Occupational Health and Safety Act
· Provincial Offences Act 1990
· Highway Traffic Act
· Health and Safety Guidelines for Ontario's Fire Services (Section 21)
· Municipal Act
. Ontario Building Code
· Ontario Electric Safety Code
· Technical Standards and Safety Authority
Municipal Legislation
. Bylaws
· Standard Operating Guidelines
· Contracts and Agreements
National Fire Protection Association (NFPA)
Underwriters Laboratories of Canada (ULC)
Office of the Fire Marshal
· Fire Services Standards
· Fire code
· Fire Protection and Prevention Act
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department Master Plan
Analysis of Needs Summary - Draft April 3.03
1
This portion (the Analysis of Needs Summary) highlights the areas of the operation that
are identified as having gaps or weaknesses. The Analysis of Needs Chart shows
detailed information regarding the gaps, as well as those areas where the department
exceeds the requirements. The categories for this component of the analysis are found in
the background data sections two (2) through seven (7). They are as follows:
Administration
Recruitment, Retention and Promotion:
The current recruitment practices for Volunteer Fire Fighters are primarily based on the
Chief's knowledge and expertise, and appear to meet the basic needs of the department.
An 11 % turnover rate 1997 to 2001 (or 2% per year) indicates that those who join, tend to
stay, but there is no formal recruitment program in place beyond word of mouth and the
posting of openings at local businesses. Some stations struggle to maintain the minimum
desired compliment of 16 fire fighters because of the lack of potential recruits in the
station area, while others have a waiting list. These situations could be balanced out with
the implementation of a formal recruitment program.
There is no formal exit interview procedure in place either, but the Chief and Deputy Chief
do gather the appropriate information when a fire fighter is leaving the department.
Through this information, they have developed a good understanding of the
usual/common reasons why a fire fighter would leave e.g. moving from the area, taking a
full time fire fighting position etc. A more formal approach could provide valuable insight
for the development of a recruitment attraction program.
Dispute Resolution:
Ministry guidelines are met through the municipal policies and procedures (as well as the
union contract) but there is no Standard Operating Guideline (SOG) for dispute resolution.
In addition, the current procedure used for the VFF relies primarily on verbal
communication and should be more formalized.
Office Space:
Although most of the stations have "some form" of office space, few have an area large
enough to allow for the paperwork requirements of the District Chiefs and Captains.
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department Master Plan
Analysis of Needs Summary - Draft April 3.03
2
Bylaws:
There were some bylaws that were either lacking in detail, out dated or non-existent with
regard to the Fire and Emergency Services Department operation. They are:
· Current Establishing & Regulating (E&R) Bylaw is outdated because it does not
refer to the Fire Protection and Prevention Act.
· E&R bylaw does not have a policy to address Fire Prevention and Public
Education.
· There has not been an adoption of a fee schedule to coincide with bylaw 99-4
regarding user fees.
Recommendations are required.
Standard Operating Guidelines (SOG's)
listed below are SOG's that will require some modification and approval.
· 001-1-21 (Pagers) does not address absences due to vacation or illness
· 001-1-27 (Training) does not specifically refer to officer training and development
procedures
· 001-1-30 Dispute Resolution does not reflect chain of command procedures
· 001-1-31 (Lost or stolen property) does not reflect the urgency of some situations
that may require verbal VS. written notification
· 004-3-02 (Protective clothing) does not make reference to Section 21
· 004-3-08 (Helmet face shield) does not address the need for eye protection
against communicable diseases
· 011-3-07 (Emergency evacuation) does not have sufficient detail regarding how
personnel will be "accounted for"
· 014-3-02 (Blood and body fluid precaution) does not indicate how gloves and other
equipment are disposed of
· 015 (Carbon monoxide detector responses) forms shown are no longer in use
· 018 (Emergency response situations) does not include a policy regarding who
should and how to deal with the media
The department also develops SOG's on an annual and/or as required basis e.g. Bio-
Terrorism and Fire Investigations.
Recommendations are required.
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department Master Plan
Analysis of Needs Summary - Draft April 3.03
3
Records Manaaement (Baker System}
Operational Data:
As stated in the Analysis Overview, the compilation of the background data required the
comprehensive development and enhancement of best practices and tracking systems.
As a result, the Fire and Emergency Services Department has put in place a database
that can provide easily accessible reports regarding many aspects of the operation. This
does not yet include however, Fire Prevention, Public Education and Inspection
information. As this data is developed, it will further improve the effectiveness and
efficiencies of the department.
Personnel Data:
Personnel files of Volunteer Fire Fighters do not include information and/or status reports
on WSIB claims, or for lost time accidents that are not WSIB related e.g. sports or actual
employment. Fire Fighter exposure to disease or hazardous materials is also not
recorded. Although these are housekeeping issues, this information is extremely
important and should be recorded.
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department Master Plan
Analysis of Needs Summary - Draft April 3.03
4
Fire Stations
Five of the six fire stations are generally well located and in good condition. The
Moonstone facility is inadequate and is not well situated to serve the response area. By
moving the station closer to the Springwater border, the Municipality could eliminate the
Fire Response Agreement (bylaw 94-75). The department could still access the Mutual
Aid Agreement when required.
Station 3 at Horseshoe Valley is in the best condition, however there is a potential hazard
regarding the evacuation of exhaust fumes. Although other stations have the same
problem from time to time, the issue with Station 3 is that the building has full time staff.
The remaining four stations require various upgrades and expansions to allow for current
and additional apparatus, showers, office space and emergency power. The paving of
parking lots would help with training maneuvers and would also eliminate gravel tracking
into the building.
Recommendations are required.
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department Master Plan
Analysis of Needs Summary - Draft April 3.03
5
Fire Prevention and Public Education
This area of service appears to be the least efficient but is the most important when
developing a strategy to reduce loss of life and property. Due to the lack of time and
human resources that is required for a proactive approach to fire prevention and public
education, the Chief and Deputy Chief have taken a more reactive stance that is based on
priorities.
Public Programs and Learning Materials:
With the exception of the Kiwanis Fire Safety House, which is operated by the Volunteer
Fire Fighters and visits all 7 elementary schools within the township, fire prevention
programs are on an "as requested" basis. There are a wide range of materials and
programs to reach both young and old audiences that are made available through the
Chief, Deputy Chief and some volunteer fire fighters, but only as requested. Although
materials and programs are distributed throughout the year, there is currently no follow-up
or evaluation system in place for these visits. The addition of a staff member to develop
and implement a proactive program would benefit the community and would meet the
requirements of the Fire Protection and Prevention Act (FPPA) e.g. 10 in 10 guideline with
regard to Urban vs Rural Fire Ground Staffing. Given the size and geography of the
township, and the fact that the fire and emergency service is volunteer based, it would
make good sense to be proactive rather than reactive in the approach to Fire Prevention
and Public Education.
Inspections:
The Chief and Deputy Chief also take a prioritized approach to the inspection process.
There is currently no municipal Fire Prevention Policy in place that includes type,
frequency and follow-up of inspection. Annuals are carried out on elementary schools,
halls and hotels within the township but all other inspections are conducted as time
permits or on a request or complaint basis. Another concern is the lack of process or
program in place to accurately identify the number of businesses requiring inspection
within the township. Such a program would not only provide the basis for a proactive
inspection program, but it would also highlight any new businesses and those with
potential hazards. This would in turn address the gap in the Pre-Incident Survey/Plan
process that shows a lack of specific information regarding use and occupancy of
buildings within the township.
Recommendations should be made regarding the required components and
implementation of a proactive Fire Prevention Public Education Program.
Investigations:
An important part of preventing incidents (and fires in particular) is the information
gathered during an investigation following an incident. Although investigations are carried
out when required, there is no policy or SOG stipulating who should conduct it.
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department Master Plan
Analysis of Needs Summary - Draft April 3.03
6
Emergency Preparedness Plan:
Also under the Fire Prevention and Public Education umbrella is the Emergency
Preparedness and Response Plan, Although the plan has been in writing and has been
updated, it has not (to date) been tested.
UPDATE ***This program has now been upgraded by the Provincial Government and is
now called Emergency Management Program. In April of 2003 the Province of Ontario is
expected to adopt "The Emergency Management Act". The Deputy Chief has undergone
the appropriate training and has received the designation of Community Emergency
Management Coordinator. This will supercede any previous legislation regarding
community emergency preparedness.
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department Master Plan
Analysis of Needs Summary - Draft April 3.03
7
Emeraency Response
Response Times and Available Personnel:
The need for comprehensive data collection for the Master Plan required the department
to do extensive research into the various components of their emergency response. As a
result, they now have excellent management and tracking systems in place to access
information on response times, personnel on scene, incident frequency, location and type
etc. Having these systems in place will assist the Fire and Emergency Services
Department in addressing the requirements of the upcoming Municipal Fire Protection
Information Survey currently carried out by the OFM. The purpose of this survey is to
ensure adequate levels of competency and service are met within the department.
Water Supply:
Not all areas of the township have year round water supply for the purpose of fire
protection or reliable year round sources for use by pumpers in the case of an emergency.
There are ways to upgrade the available water sources such as dry hydrants and proper
marking of sites, but there are also a number of privately owned properties that have
excellent sources of water (for this purpose) and access could be negotiated.
Recommendations should be made.
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department Master Plan
Analysis of Needs Summary - Draft April 3.03
8
..
Trainina
During the background data collection for this document, the record keeping portions of
the training programs and procedures were also moved to a database to enable the
department to readily access information and develop reports. Although computerized
now, this information has (in the past) and continues to require extensive updating and
monitoring to ensure that all firefighting personnel are properly trained and certified as
required by guidelines, legislation, bylaws etc. As indicated in the Analysis Overview,
there is a need for a full time Training and Development Officer to develop and facilitate
training programs, as well as organize and maintain training records.
Recommendations are required.
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department Master Plan
Analysis of Needs Summary - Draft April 3.03
9
Communications
There are no gaps in the communication policies and procedures, however there are
some concerns regarding the enhanced 9-1-1 system and the ongoing use of 4 party-
party lines within the township. This party line system requires a caller to call directly (in
case of an emergency) rather than using the 9-1-1 system and is therefore not as efficient.
The issue needs to be address by Bell Canada and or the customer.
Pager and radio reception is effected by non-response pockets. However, the Industry
Canada Spectrum Re-deployment Plan for land mobile equipment (which will come into
effect January 1, 2004) should eliminate these problems
DRAFT ONLY ...........UPDATED APRIL 3,2003
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department Master Plan
Analysis of Needs Summary - Draft April 3.03
10
t
Risk Analysis Summary
The objective of the Risk Analysis was to gather information regarding the Township of
Oro-Medonte's exposure to potential risk, and to provide a basis for the development of
risk management strategies. The process entailed an in depth "station by station"
analysis of the potential risks within each response area as it relates to the current level
of service, and the identification of those properties in the Township, that are considered
to be in the "high risk" category with regard to:
· Loss of life... human (public and VFF) and livestock or wildlife
· Loss of property... building stock or vacant land and the economic impact
· Reputation... credibility and level of service
· Liability... of the township
Although the Fire and Emergency Services Department provides its' services in a wide
range of situations, definitions are only available for fire related incidents. To ensure all
facets of the departments' services were addressed, the following incidents were also
considered. These incidents are not covered by the same codes and authorities as fire
related incidents, but they must initially be treated with the same cautionary approach
because the severity of the situation cannot be determined until it has been assessed at
the scene. They are:
· Traffic(auto and truck), boating or other incident/accident causing injury
· Hazardous material spills (Hazmat) and 8io- Terrorism
· Medical emergencies
Following are the references to Codes and Authorities regarding "high risk" under the
Ontario Fire Code (OFC), National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) and the Fire
Protection and Prevention Act (FPPA). Also quoted, is a portion of the Guidelines on
Municipal Fire Protection regarding the Simplified Risk Assessment.
The Ontario Fire Code defines high risk as "Extra Hazard"
6.2.5.3 (and supporting documents)
"Where the quantity of combustible material present is such that fires of severe
magnitude may be expected, such as in woodworking, auto repair, aircraft servicing,
mercantile storage areas, warehouses with high-piled combustibles and processes
incorporating flammable or combustible liquids, the occupancy shall be graded as extra
hazard."
NFPA defines high risk in two categories:
"Severe and High Hazard Occupancy"
3.2.3.1. Severe
"Where quantity and combustibility of contents are very high. Fires in these occupancies
can be expected to develop very rapidly and have high rates of heat release."
3.2.4.1 High Hazard Occupancy
"Where quantity and combustibility of contents are high. Fires in these occupancies can
be expected to develop rapidly and have high rates of heat release."
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department Master Plan
Risk Analysis Summary - Draft April 3.03
1
.,
Fire Protection and Prevention Act
Part 6 Section 18
"For purposes of this Part, fire safety includes, safety from the risk that a fire, if started,
would seriously endanger the health and safety of any person or the quality of the
environment for any use that can be made of it."
Guideline 04.40A.03 Fire Prevention Public Education
Simplified Risk Assessment
Conducting a simplified risk assessment is a practical information gathering and
analyzing exercise intended to create a community fire profile that will aid in identifying
appropriate programs or activities that can be implemented to effectively address the
community's fire safety needs.
As each community is different, the simplified risk assessment and ensuing fire concern
profile will assist in identifying the degree to which these activities are required in
accordance with local needs and circumstances. The simplified risk assessment is
made up of the following components:
. Demographic profile
. Building stock profile
. Local and provincial fire loss profiles
. Information analysis and evaluation
. Priority setting for compliance
. Implementing solutions
Risk Analysis Summary
As highlighted in the Analysis Overview and the Analysis of Needs documents, the Fire
and Emergency Services Department generally meets it's mandate with regard to
emergency response and constructive impact at the scene of an incident. The areas
lacking in efficiencies are those covered by Fire Prevention and Public Education and
Training and Development. These functions are currently carried out in a reactive,
rather than proactive fashion and should now become a focus of the department and the
Township with regard to risk management.
As a result of the background data collection, the department now has a comprehensive
database by which management can assess and monitor the impact of the "at risk"
properties and roadways within the municipality. This combined with a proactive
approach to Fire Prevention and Public Education and Training and Development would
continue to ensure that loss of life and property is kept to a minimum.
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department Master Plan
Risk Analysis Summary - Draft April 3.03
2
I
The "station by station" analysis was carried out using the following components to
identify the potential risks for each station.
Community:
Review of the building stock to identify those properties that expose the community to
potential risk.
Growth:
The actual and projected residential, commercial and industrial growth.
Emergency Response:
Review of emergency response capabilities for each station.
Fire Stations:
Review of each fire station with regard to location, facilities, equipment and human
resources.
Water:
Location of fire protection water sources in station areas and its proximity to the potential
risks.
Roads:
Review of accessibility and condition of Provincial, County and Municipal roadways and
trails.
Communications:
Review of the communication systems used by the department.
Tourism:
The impact of tourism on the six fire station response areas.
Fire Prevention and Public Education:
Review of Fire Prevention and Public Education programs for the department as a
whole.
Staffing:
Review of staffing requirements by station and the department as a whole.
Following, is a summary of the formal Risk Analysis that was conducted "station by
station". The information gathered on the many properties and areas of the township
can now provide insight into the planning and monitoring of programs to assist the Fire
and Emergency Services Department in their risk management responsibilities. The
"station by station" breakdown provides detailed information on the municipalities'
exposure to risk based on the criteria set out by the governing authorities (OFC, NFPA,
FPPA).
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department Master Plan
Risk Analysis Summary - Draft April 3.03
3
Community
Each station response area has a mix of residential and commercial buildings, and a
network of major roadways that present a potential risk for fire, medical assist, hazmat
and/or rescue.
Residential
The projected growth in housing developments in several areas of the township will not
create an additional burden for the Fire and Emergency Services Department on its own,
however, the department will have to grow (and keep pace) as the needs of the
community change and population increases.
New homes and home renovations are inspected by the Municipal Building Inspectors
and the Chief and Deputy Chief are required to carry out inspections on solid fuel
burning appliances, fire walls, air duct systems and any other fire related items under the
building code and municipal bylaw 94-15. All of the above ensures that new
construction will meet the fire safety/prevention requirements of the Ontario Building
Code. The older communities with high-density and multi-residential areas however will
present ongoing challenges for the department. Approximately one half of the calls
handled by Shanty Bay and Hawkestone Stations from 1997 - 2001 were in the
Lakeshore and Ridge Road area. This would indicate that whether the incident occurred
on a property or on a roadway, the density of population in this area was an influencing
factor. The impact of the "aging" population must also be monitored. Of 88 calls
answered by Rugby from 1997 - 2001 approximately 33% were at Big Cedar and
Fergushill Estates, both high-density seniors' communities.
Commercial
As with new residential properties, the new commercial properties within the Township
do not present the challenges that older buildings do. However, commercial properties
as a whole present a wide range of potential risks with regard to loss of life and property.
With industrial parks, pipelines, railways, agriculture and aggregate companies operating
within the Township, each response area has potential risks. With the additional
dangers and risks associated with the transportation of goods through the Township,
incidents involving explosion and/or hazardous materials are a reality for the Fire and
Emergency Services Department. Those incidents that have occurred have been
handled effectively and efficiently, but the department now has the information and the
opportunity to develop preventative programs and policies.
At the other end of the spectrum, there are a number of commercial properties within the
Township that deal more directly with the consumer and in some cases large numbers of
people. These gathering places pose a different challenge for the Fire and Emergency
Services Department with regard to numbers involved and/or the nature of the activities.
Recommendations are required regarding the development of policies and programs
that would prevent incidents where preplanning, monitoring and education can be used
to influence or modify behaviour, habits and practices.
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department Master Plan
Risk Analysis Summary - Draft April 3.03
4
f
Roadways
There are three provincial highways within the township (Highways 11, 12 and 400) that
provide access to and through the municipality. In the period between 1997-2001 there
were approximately 349 incidents (or 31 % of 1115) along the highway corridors. This
indicates the significant impact these roadways have on the Fire and Emergency
Services Department and the services they are required to provide. The volume of
traffic and hence the number of incidents on Highway 11 in particular has significantly
increased in the five year period (97-01) and this increase has highlighted the issues
involved in reaching the scene efficiently e.g. travel time to the highway. Travel times
can be further extended because the location of incidents on Highways 11 and 400 may
also require the responding fire fighters to travel north to an overpass that will take them
into the southbound lanes in order to reach the scene.
The element of risk however, does not so much lie in the volume of traffic, but in the kind
of traffic and the various types of cargo being transported. As with the railways, the
highway transportation of dangerous goods presents a potential risk to the communities
surrounding these highways. It requires the Fire and Emergency Services Department
to ensure that the appropriate programs are in place to prevent or neutralize the effects
of an incident where there is potential for explosion and/or hazardous material spills.
The information gathered through the risk analysis process has provided the department
with the tools to assess and then develop and monitor these programs to safeguard
against such disasters.
The County roads (Penetangueshene, Horseshoe Valley, Ridge, Vasey and Old Barrie
Roads) also have a relatively high number of incidents. The risk along these roads and
in particular Horseshoe Valley Road and Ridge Road is related to volume of traffic and
some seasonal effects.
In the "station by station" breakdown, there is a section regarding roadways and trails.
In this section the Provincial and County roads are noted with respect to individual
stations covering them. There is also mention of the municipal roads and trails. The
only risk factors noted regarding municipal roads were the few areas in the southern
portion of the township that have unopened roads. This situation makes it difficult to
respond to incidents in a timely manner and should be rectified.
Trails throughout the township are generally accessible by some kind of rescue vehicle.
The department has an A TV that operates well throughout most of the year, but the
winter weather conditions render some trails impassible and hinder rescue operations
because of limited access and the lack of a snowmobile.
Recommendations are required.
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department Master Plan
Risk Analysis Summary - Draft April 3.03
5
.
Municipal Growth
Every response area has approved building lots and therefore, the potential for growth.
This in itself does not present a potential for risk, as was highlighted earlier. However,
the 2001 census data showed that Oro-Medonte has increased its population by 9%
since the 1996 census and that 25% of the total population is over 55 years of age. This
increase in population and specifically the projected senior population will have an effect
on the number of medical assist calls in particular. These calls have already increased
due to the new Tiered Response Program, which requires the Fire and Emergency
Services Department to assist ambulance with medical emergency calls as per the
criteria outlined in section D page 5. The planned expansion of the Airport, Oro-Center
and the industrial parks will also impact the Fire & Emergency Services Department.
Emergency Response Times
This portion of the risk analysis provides the most important information with regard to
risk management. The Township's exposure to risk can now be monitored with regard
to response times and the factors that affect them. By breaking down the total response
time into dispatch, roll out and travel times, the department can now assess its
weaknesses on a "call by call" basis. Information captured in the "Fire Station" section of
the breakdown, compliments this data by providing in depth information on incident
location and numbers on scene, which then gives a full picture for monitoring and
evaluation of service. The current review of the 10 in 10 Guideline by OFM will provide
a standard by which the department can use this data to measure levels of efficiencies.
The 10 in 10 Guideline promotes 10 fire fighters on scene within 10 minutes for a single
family dwelling structure fire, 90% of the time in an urban Fire and Emergency Services
Department.
For purposes of this study, the average response time was calculated on all types of
calls; property fires, pre-fire conditions, public hazards, rescue/extrication and
medicallresuscitator calls. These are the categories used in Section D of the
background materials. With an all station, all call response time at 11 minutes 57
seconds, the department is running at a relatively high level of efficiency, when the
geographic nature of the township and seasonal weather challenges are taken into
consideration.
The risk management issues associated with response times, are related to the dispatch
times and some roll out times.
With the average dispatch time at 3 minutes and 1 second it is twice the acceptable time
of 90 seconds, as set out by NFPA Standard 12-21. This component of the response
time is not directly managed by the Chief and Deputy Chief, but is handled by Barrie Fire
Control. Discussions have already been initiated to address the issue.
The roll out times can be managed through ensuring that fire fighters are available
throughout the day, night, weekdays and weekends. By tightening up the recruitment
process (consideration of work and shift commitments) the Chief and Deputy Chief can
ensure that adequate numbers are available.
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department Master
Risk Analysis Summary - Draft April 3.03
6
4;
Fire Stations
Risks regarding the fire stations are related to location of the station, its condition and
whether or not it has a constructive impact on the area it serves. The information
gathered and analyzed in this portion of the risk analysis, provides insight into the
numbers on scene, location and type of incident, response accessibility and the
condition of the apparatus.
All stations, with the exception of one, are generally well situated for the response area
they serve. The Moonstone Station however, is inadequate and poorly located. The
current location requires the township to have a Fire Protection Agreement with the
Township of Springwater in order to service the most westerly portions of the area. By
re-Iocating the station, when it is replaced, the municipality would save $1,000.00 per
incident (minimum) and would have better control over the identified risks in the
response area.
The other response area highlighted during this risk analysis was the Highway 11
corridor that is primarily shared by Shanty Bay and Hawkestone Stations. Shanty Bay
responded to 101 of 263 (38%) incidents along the corridor from 1997 - 2001 and
Hawkestone responded to 108 of 252 (42%) in the same period. The remaining calls
were relatively close to each station, showing a high demand for services in the
immediate areas as well. Statistical data shows that although roll out times are low, the
average travel times are in the high range, showing the effects of long distances to
Highway 11. Response times are also hindered by limited north south access onto the
highway. These figures provide a basis to justify a seventh fire station that should be
located close to the highway and allow for quick access north and south. The proposed
airport expansion and potential growth that would come with it e.g. Oro-Center indicates
that Line 7 would be an excellent location for a new fire station.
Recommendations are required.
Water
There are some risk management challenges associated with the availability of water for
the purpose of fire protection. In particular the areas around Lake Simcoe Regional
Airport and the industrial parks, were identified. Although the department is well
equipped with tankers, the lack of water (for this purpose) could hinder the capabilities of
the fire fighters to contain a serious incident in these response areas. With the tanker
compliment spread throughout the township, it means that any water supply strategy
must take into consideration resources (tanker commitment) and the critical effects of
travel time. Through this risk analysis process, valuable insight has been gained into the
potential water supply both public and private. This has highlighted some areas of the
township where water sources can be upgraded and partnerships can be developed to
ensure that sufficient water is available for fire protection throughout the township.
Recommendations are required.
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department Master Plan
Risk Analysis Summary - Draft April 3.03
7
;>
Communications
There is limited/low risk associated with the department's communication systems but
there are two areas of concern.
There are several reception pockets throughout the township that effect radio
communications between dispatch and the fire fighters, but this will be addressed when
the new Spectrum Management System is put in place in January 2004.
Secondly, there are still some areas of the township that are serviced by 4 party party-
lines. This requires the caller to dial directly to the Barrie Fire Control Center in order to
report an incident instead of using the enhanced 9-1-1 system. It is unknown at this time
as to whether or not all party line customers are aware of this problem (or what Bell
Canada can/will do regarding the situation).
Recommendations are required.
Tourism
Tourism was included in the risk analysis because of the increasing influence it has on
the numbers of people traveling to and through the township and the fact that the
Township is promoting itself as a year round destination for visitors. The potential for
risk lies in the numbers of visitors traveling on the roads and using the trails year round.
Recommendations are required.
Fire Prevention and Public Education
The risks associated with Fire Prevention and Public Education is primarily due to the
lack of a specific policy that promotes proactive programming for the community. This
component is very important in providing the support structure for the Fire and
Emergency Services Department and can help to reduce the number of incidents.
Recommendations are required
Staffing
Risks associated with staffing issues are related to availability of fire fighters and the
need for a Training and Development Officer and a Fire Prevention and Public Education
Officer. General staffing (fire fighter) needs can be met through the development of a
recruitment program that will ensure adequate personnel are available for each station.
The Training and Fire Prevention and Public Education Officers are required to provide
support and stability to the department.
Recommendations are required.
DRAFT ONLY UPDATED.. mAPRIL 3, 2003
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department Master Plan
Risk Analysis Summary - Draft April 3.03
8
,\
Fire and Emergency Service Department
Master Plan
Risk Analysis By Station
Station # 1 Shanty Bay
Area of coverage 8,431 Hectares
Community (see building stock breakdown on page 9, section C of Background)
Exposure to potential risk -
Listed below are buildings and properties that expose the community to a potentially
higher level of risk than normal and could result in death or environmental damage. The
level of risk for incident is related to building/property content or the unknown factors
(e.g. vehicles using highway 11). Emergency response to these incidents could include
Fire, Medical Assist Hazmat and lor Rescue.
. Airport
. Pipeline Compression Stations
. Arena
. Marinas
· Industrial Mall (chemical storage and use)
. Covered mall
. Multi residential units
· Retirement Home
. High density of population at waterfront
. Saw Mill
. Highway 11
. Wrecking yards
. Fireworks (storage and sales)
. Auto refinishing
. Auto Repair
. Agriculture (chemical storage and use)
Economic Impact
Listed below are those buildings or properties that expose the community to a
potentially higher level of risk and could result in loss of jobs, loss of revenue, loss
of property or loss of tax base. The potential risk is related to building/property
content or the unknown factors (e.g. vehicles using highway 11).
· Commercial and industrial properties
. Arena
. Marinas
· Pipeline Compression Stations
. Airport
. Highway 11
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 1
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 1 Shanty Bay - Draft April 3/03
I>
Growth and Population (Community Profile pages 34 - 36)
Based on the Official Plan (1997) the Township of Oro-Medonte is expected to
increase in population by a projected 10,181 over a 20 year period or by 2016. In
1996 the population was 16,698 (Census Canada) and has now increased to
18,315 (2001 Census) or by 9%.
There is no accurate formula (at present) to determine the population by
response area, however statistics have given us some age group data to
consider. Approximately 25% of the total population (18,315) are over 55 years of
age, 32% are under 25, and the remaining 43% are between 25 and 54.
Age Group 2001
o - 4 years = 5.2%
5 - 14 years = 14.5%
15 - 19 years = 7.3%
20 - 24 years = 4.9 %
25 - 44 years = 27.0 %
45 - 54 years = 16.5 %
55 - 64 years = 11.6 %
65 - 74 years = 7.8 %
75 - 84 years = 5.2%
Age Group 2016
15 - 19 years
20 - 29 years
30 - 34 years
35 - 39 years
40 - 59 years
60 - 69 years
70 - 79 years
80 - 89 years
90 - 99 years
From a risk management perspective the seniors (over 55) and the young people
(under 25) can benefit from strong Fire Prevention and Public Education
programs that would reduce incidents in the future. The current number of
medical assist calls (which will escalate with the tiered response program) is due
in part to the large seniors population and affects some stations more than
others. This type of call will potentially increase as the 45 to 54 group ages.
According to the Community Profile, building permits across the township are in
line with past averages from 1980 to 1996 of 136 per year. From 1997 to 2001
there have been an average of 129 residential building permits, 5 commercial
permits, 1 industrial permit, 35 multi-dwelling permits per year.
Shanty Bay Highlights
Shanty Bay area has approximately 308 approved residential lots (of which some
are under construction) and 1 industrial park that is under development.
The current number of approved lots alone does not elevate the level of risk at
this time, but may increase the need for medical/emergency assistance in the
future.
The information highlighted and analyzed above could change dependant upon
the outcome of the Official Plan review in 2003.
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 2
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 1 Shanty Bay - Draft April 3/03
Emergency Response - Host Station - Shanty Bay
This is the time frame from a call being received by dispatch through to the
arrival of the first host station emergency vehicle and personnel on the scene of
the incident. This process involves the following:
Dispatch
. call received by dispatch
. dispatch tones out
Assemblv and Roll-Out
. assembly at station
. leaving the station and confirming vehicle response (some firefighters will go
directly to the incident in their own vehicle)
Travel
. travel time to scene
. arrival on scene
. Notify dispatch that host station is on scene.
The working committee established the following time lines as being
acceptable:
Dispatch - call received to tones complete 1 % minutes (as per NFPA Standard 12-21)
Assembly and Roll-Out - assemble at station and confirm vehicle responding is 5 minutes
Travel I Arrival on Scene - due to the geographic nature, of the township,
seasonal weather conditions and the proximity of an incident to the location of
the station, a standard timeframe cannot be applied.
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 3
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 1 Shanty Bay - Draft April 3/03
Emergency Response Con't ....
The following charts show the average emergency response times for all Shanty
Bay area calls (1997-2001) including property fires, pre-fire conditions, public
hazards, rescue 1 extrication and medical 1 resuscitator calls, as outlined in
categories in Section D (pages 3 - 5)
Average Emergency Response Times, 1997-2001
Total Day Night Weekday Weekend
Number of Calls 263 145 118 173 90
Avg. Dispatch Time 2:49 2:51 2:47 2:41 3:04
Avg. Roll-Out Time 2:40 2:57 2:18 2:53 2:15
(% under 5 minutes) 93% 91% 96% 92% 96%
Ava. Travel Time 6:31 6:44 6:15 6:25 6:41
Avg. Total Response 12:00 12:32 11:20 12:00 11:59
Time
Tones Completed Until on Scene (under 10 minutes, between 10-15
minutes, over 15 minutes), 1997-2001
Average Day Night Weekday Weekend
Under 10 Minutes 63% 61% 64% 64% 60%
10 & 15 Minutes 32% 31% 32% 29% 36%
Over 15 Minutes 5% 8% 4% 7% 4%
All Stations Summary
Total Day Night Weekday Weekend
Number of Calls 1115 624 491 678 437
Avg. Dispatch Time 3:01 3:06 2:54 2:57 3:10
Roll-Out Time 2:58 3:05 2:49 3:05 2:52
(% under 5 minutes) 88% 86% 90% 85% 92%
Avg. Travel Time 5:57 5:50 6:08 5:48 6:11
Avg. Total Response 11:57 12:01 11:51 11:50 12:12
Time
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 4
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 1 Shanty Bay - Draft April 3/03
Emergency Response Can't....
Associated Risks - Emergency Response Times
- Includes all 1115 calls (1997 - 2001), property fires, pre-fire conditions, public
hazards, rescue I extrication and medical I resuscitator calls.
Shanty Bav
Percentage of Total Calls:
- 23.5 % or 263 calls
Dispatch Times (avg. 2:49}:
- all times are over the acceptable 90 seconds, but lower than the all station
average which is 3:01
Roll Out Times (avg. 2:40):
- are all shorter than all station average which is 2:58
Travel Times (ava. 6:31):
- are higher, but within 60 seconds of all station average which is 5:57
Total Response Times (ava. 12:00):
- are in line and within 30 seconds of the all station average which is 11 :57
Tones Complete Until On Scene:
- Personnel and Apparatus on the scene within 10 minutes in an average of
63% of all calls
There is no potential risk to the area serviced by Shanty Bay Station, but,
ongoing monitoring should be carried out to review dispatch times that are higher
than the acceptable 90 seconds. Travel times are also high and are due in part
to the number of calls along the Highway 11 corridor. For additional information
regarding travel times see Call Volume Analysis & Proximity to Incident Data on
pages 6-7.
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 5
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 1 Shanty Bay - Draft April 3/03
Fire Station - Shanty Bay
The following data refers to:
- the location of station with respect to the incidents it responds to
- analysis of incidents by volume and locations
- station personnel - volunteer firefighters
- facilities, apparatus and equipment
Location
Close to:
. designated growth area ( 308 lots)
· older settlement area
. high density population e.g. water front
. saw mill
· easily accessible to the majority of the volunteer firefighters
Not close to:
. airport
. pipeline
. arena
. covered mall
. highway
. marina
Call Volume Analvsis
Year
Highway 11
Lakeshore Road Ridge Road
1997 19 3 10
1998 17 5 10
1999 15 4 5
2000 24 3 6
2001 26 4 10
1997-2001 101 19 41
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 6
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 1 Shanty Bay - Draft April 3/03
Fire Station - Shanty Bay Con't .....
Location of Incidents
. Highway 11, Lakeshore Road and Ridge Road calls account for 161 or 61 %
of the 263 calls (1997-2001)
. the remaining 102 or 39% of calls were throughout the rest of the response
area with the majority being in the village of Shanty Bay, Barrie Terrace and
along the waterfront
Proximity of Station to Incident and Accessibility
. incidents occurring on the Ridge Road, Lakeshore Road and in the Village of
Shanty Bay are easiest to respond to
. incidents on Highway 11 (especially northbound from Penetanguishene Road
to Line 2 and from Line 7 southbound to Penetanguishene Road are the most
time consuming to respond to on the Highway 11 corridor, as well as the area
north of Highway 11 (may need to go North to go South)
. the large number of incidents on the Highway 11 corridor contributes
significantly to a higher travel time because of the distance between the
station and the highway. This can be further complicated by limited access
North and South.
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department. Master Plan 7
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 1 Shanty Bay - Draft April 3/03
Fire Station - Shanty Bay Can't .....
Station Personnel - Volunteer Fire Fighters
Full personnel compliment is 16 volunteer firefighters per station. Through the
recruitment process, measures are taken to maintain full compliment (see page 5,
section A, of Background). The chart below showing the average number of firefighters
on scene is based on all incidents including property fires, pre-fire conditions, public
hazards, rescue I extrication and medical I resuscitator calls, as outlined in categories in
Section D (pages 3 - 5).
Station #1 - Host Station (host station firefighters only)
Year #F.F's Ava. Day Niaht Week-Day Weekend
1997 15 5 4 6 5 5
1998 16 6 6 7 6 7
1999 16 6 6 7 7 6
2000 15 7 6 8 6 8
2001 16 6 5 7 6 6
1997-2001 6 5 7 6 6
6 of 16 firefighters mayor may not be an acceptable level of response based on all calls
(as outlined above) due to the nature of the calls as follows:
· a structure fire is automatically a multi station response ( minimum 2 station
response)
· a burning complaint call can usually be handled by 1 or 2 personnel
· all other calls (carbon monoxide, rescue I medical etc.) are responded to by at least
1 apparatus carrying 1 personnel
Day-time response for Shanty Bay is lower than night-time and weekend, but has
improved over the 5 year period and is not related to the yearly compliment fluctuations.
The number of firefighters on scene are assessed and adjusted by Incident Command
personnel to ensure sufficient firefighters are present as the incident dictates.
Additionally, this information is tracked and monitored on a continuous basis to provide
insight into staffing availability and needs.
Additional information regarding staffing implications will be covered in general by a
portion of this risk analysis addressing staffing issues relative to the whole department.
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 8
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 1 Shanty Bay - Draft April 3/03
Fire Station - Shanty Bay Con't ....
Facility, Apparatus and Equipment
Facility
· no room for additional apparatus
· no emergency power
. no office space
Apparatus and Equipment
(see section B of the background materials)
OFM recommends front line apparatus (pumper, tanker) be replace every 15 years.
Oro-Medonte reviews apparatus replacement every 20 - 25 years depending on
condition and repair costs.
Based on a 20 - 25 year life span and monitored on an annual basis the following
evaluations have been made regarding replacement of apparatus and equipment.
. Pumper - due for replacement 2016
· Tanker - due for replacement 2008
· Equipment e.g. hose, breathing apparatus etc is replaced as required on an on-going
basis
· Rescue Vans 1 and 2 (with equipment e.g. jaws of life, positive pressure ventilation
fans etc) respond to station 1 incidents
The apparatus is in good working order and there is no need for additions based on
potential risk, projected growth or breakdown. Replacement time frames provide
sufficient time under the capital expenditure policy/procedure that is currently in place.
Equipment is assessed for wear on an on-going basis and replaced as required to meet
applicable standards, needs and circumstances.
Associated Potential Risks - Shanty Bav Fire Station
Station Location
those areas that are closest to the station, (eg. older settlement areas, waterfront,
etc.) are at less risk then those properties along the highway 11 corridor and north of
Highway 11, due to travel time and highway access
Call Volume Analysis and Incident Location
there is reason for concern regarding the number of calls along the Highway 11
corridor and in particular the increase in 2000-2001 as the travel time is elongated for
these calls due to access on and off the highway
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 9
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 1 Shanty Bay - Draft April 3/03
Fire Station - Shanty Bay Can't ....
Station Personnel
response numbers are good based on a database of all calls (structure fires,
burning complaints and medical assist calls etc.) however, this would indicate
the need to maintain a minimum compliment of 16 firefighters to ensure an
average of 6 or 7 on scene
Facility
lack of emergency power, office space or additional room for apparatus does
not present a potential risk at this time
Apparatus and Equipment
based on the replacement criteria (standards, needs, circumstances and the
corporate procedures) there is no potential risk with regard to apparatus and
equipment at this time
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 10
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 1 Shanty Bay - Draft April 3/03
Water
Water sources for the purpose of fire protection are identified as being used year
round e.g. hydrants** and holding tanks. All other sources are considered static
and mayor may not be easily accessible year round e.g. frozen over or not easy
to locate due to snow -cover. Private sources were not included in the mapping
process but some are mentioned in this analysis.
**Hydrants are considered in two categories, credited and non-credited.
. Credited - meets fire flow requirements of minimum 400 gallons per minute
. Non-credited - all others that don't meet the requirement
In addition to these water sources the tankers and pumpers can transport water
quickly to the fire scene and be used until other sources are identified. Mutual
aid can also be accessed if required to supply water.
Locations
Hydrants
. Credited hydrants at Harbourwood
. Non-credited hydrant in Shanty Bay (development behind fire station)
. Permission to use City of Barrie hydrants
Static Water Sources
Pumper Accessible
. Holding tank with dry hydrant at Guthrie School
. Lines 1 & 2 above and below Highway 11 (Gasoline Alley)
. Line 6 at Ridge Road (Ora Station)
. Lakeshore Rd between Lines 5 & 6 (Gull Rock Marina)
Portable Pump Accessible (good & fair sources)
. Gore Road, (behind Napolean Woodstoves)
. Lines 1,2,3,5 above & below Hwy 11 (Gasoline Alley to Guthrie)
. 15/16 Side Road at Lines 3 & 4
. Ridge Road at Line 6 (Ora Station)
. Lakeshore between Lines 5 & 7 (Gull Rock Marina area)
See Map in Section D
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 11
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 1 Shanty Bay - Draft April 3/03
Water continued.....
Availability of sources to high risk areas
Readily available to:
. Waterfront and built up subdivisions, Marinas
Not readily available to:
. Airport, Saw Mill, Wrecking yards, Agriculture (barns)
Taking into consideration the following factors:
. the lack of water source in the area between Lines 3 & 7 (east of Guthrie
through to Oro Centre) 15/16 Side Road & above Hwy 11, between Hwy 11 &
Ridge Rd from Lines 3 to 7
· the difficulties involved in crossing Highway 11 and the kinds of potential
incidents on the highway,
We can conclude that the Fire and Emergency services could experience some
difficulty in containing/fighting a fire at the Airport, Saw Mill, Wrecking Yards or on
some agricultural properties in these areas. This is again complicated by the
travel times to this response area.
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 12
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 1 Shanty Bay - Draft April 3/03
Roads
Fire and Emergency Services need to be able to access all areas of the township
in order to meet the level of services expected and required of them.
Provincial Roads
Highway 11
. difficulty accessing the highway because of the overpasses e.g. may have to
go south in order to go north
County Roads
. in good condition and easily accessible for emergency
Municipal Roads
. Windfields Drive is not a through road, requiring emergency vehicles to
access homes from both ends instead of driving straight through
. Line 1 to Ridge Road is not open ( must travel to Thunder Bridge to access
Ridge Road)
Trail System
. Accessible for most emergency vehicles.
There is a potential for risk relative to loss of life and property due to the difficulty
in accessing some properties where the roads are not open to through traffic.
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 13
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 1 Shanty Bay - Draft April 3/03
Communications
Two-way radio communication is available through emergency vehicles and all
officers.
Volunteer Fire Fighters rely on pagers only (one way communication) until roll out
in the emergency vehicles.
Concerns:
There are some difficulties with pager and portable radio response due in part to
the effects of reception pockets. Spectrum Management, under Industry Canada,
has set a deadline of 2004 for the re-alignment of band width, which will correct
this problem.
In some areas of the township there are still 4 party party-lines which means that
residents must call directly to the Barrie Fire Control Dispatch Center instead of
using the enhanced 9-1-1 system. If the resident dials 9-1-1 they may reach
another dispatch center other than Barrie because of the trunk line system. This
means delays in response while the correct fire department is identified and then
notified. There is currently no information available regarding if or when Bell
Canada will correct this situation.
Only the 9-1-1 VS. call direct issue could pose a potential risk.
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 14
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 1 Shanty Bay - Draft April 3/03
Tourism
Given that the township is promoting tourism and recreation through its'
brochures, due consideration should be given to the impact any increased
activity will have on the Fire and Emergency Services Department.
In addition to the Parks and Recreation Master Plan (completed 1997) the
Township has completed a Parkland Secondary Study that will be beneficial in
providing further details regarding future direction in tourism/recreation.
Outlined below are the activities that currently take place in the Shanty Bay
response area that can result in potential risk for the township with regard to
hazmat, fire, response times etc. and for medical and public assistance calls
including cold water / ice rescue and remote search and rescue.
. Water front - year round
. Arena - hockey tournaments
. Ball diamonds - tournaments
. Golf
. Cross country skiing
. Agritourism
. Triple Drive-in Theater
. Additional use of highways as tourists pass through or stay in the area
. Increased use of airport
. Lake Country Oro-Medonte Rail Trail
Based on the volume of incidents along Highway 11 corridor there is reason for
concern regarding potential risk, but further monitoring as to where and when the
incidents occur should be carried out before determining the effects of increased
tourism.
DRAFT UPDATE ....... April 3, 2003
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 15
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 1 Shanty Bay - Draft April 3/03
:*
Fire and Emergency Services Department
Master Plan
Risk Analysis By Station
Station # 2 Hawkestone
Area of coverage 6,810 Hectares
Community (see building stock breakdown on page 10, section C, of Background)
Exposure to potential risk -
Listed below are buildings and properties that expose the community to a
potentially higher level of risk than normal and could result in death or
environmental damage. The level of risk for incident is related to
building/property content or the unknown factors (e.g. vehicles using highway
11). Emergency response to these incidents could include Fire, Medical Assist
Hazmat and / or Rescue.
. Airport
. Marinas (dryland and waterfront)
. Industrial Parks
. Multi residential units
. High density of population at waterfront (public park and private campgrounds
with cabins)
. Highway 11
. Agriculture (chemical storage and use)
. Commercial
. Garden Supplies
. Aggregate Haulage
Economic Impact
Listed below are those buildings or properties that expose the community to a
potentially higher level of risk and could result in loss of jobs, loss of revenue, loss of
property or loss of tax base. The potential risk is related to building/property content.
or the unknown factors (e.g. vehicles using highway 11).
. Airport
. Commercial and industrial properties
. Marinas
. Highway 11
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 1
Risk Analysis - Station # 2 Hawkestone - Draft April 3/03
"
Growth and Population (Community Profile pages 34 - 36)
Based on the Official Plan (1997) the Township of Oro-Medonte is expected to increase
in population by a projected 10,181 over a 20 year period or by 2016. In 1996 the
population was 16,698 (Census Canada) and has now increased to 18,315 (2001
Census) or by 9%.
There is no accurate formula (at present) to determine the population by response area,
however statistics have given us some age group data to consider. Approximately 25%
of the total population (18,315) are over 55 years of age, 32% are under 25, and the
remaining 43% are between 25 and 54.
Age Group 2001
o - 4 years = 5.2%
5 - 14 years = 14.5%
15 -19 years = 7.3%
20 - 24 years = 4.9 %
25 - 44 years = 27.0 %
45 - 54 years = 16.5 %
55 - 64 years = 11.6 %
65 -74 years = 7.8 %
75 - 84 years = 5.2%
Age Group 2016
15 -19 years
20 - 29 years
30 - 34 years
35 - 39 years
40 - 59 years
60 - 69 years
70 - 79 years
80 - 89 years
90 - 99 years
From a risk management perspective the seniors (over 55) and the young people (under
25) can benefit from strong Fire Prevention and Public Education programs which would
reduce incidents in the future. The current number of medical assist calls (which will
escalate with the tiered response program) is due in part to the large seniors population
and affects some stations more than others. This type of call will potentially increase as
the 45 to 54 group ages.
According to the Community Profile, building permits across the township are in line with
past averages from 1980 to 1996 of 136 per year. From 1997 to 2001 there have been
an average of 129 residential building permits, 5 commercial permits, 1 industrial permit,
35 multi-dwelling permits per year.
Hawkestone Highlights
Hawkestone has approximately 246 approved residential lots (some of which are under
construction) and 2 industrial parks that is under development.
The number of approved lots does not pose a risk, however the largest of the industrial
parks was inherited through re-structuring and the township had no initial input into its
development. This has left the Fire and Emergency Services Department with many
unknown factors regarding the associated level of risk.
Information highlighted and analyzed above could change based on the outcomes of the
Official Plan review in 2003 or the Hawkestone Secondary Plan.
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 2
Risk Analysis - Station # 2 Hawkestone - Draft April 3/03
Emergency Response - Host Station - Hawkestone
This is the time frame from a call being received by dispatch through to the
arrival of the first host station emergency vehicle and personnel on the scene of
the incident. This process involves the following:
Dispatch
. call received by dispatch
. dispatch tones out
. notify dispatch that host station is on scene
Assembly and Roll-Out
. assembly at station
. leaving the station and confirming vehicle response (some firefighters will go
directly to the incident in their own vehicle)
Travel
. travel time to scene
. arrival on scene
. notify dispatch that host station is on scene
The working committee established the following time lines as being
acceptable:
Dispatch - call received to tones complete 1 % minutes (as per NFPA Standard 12-21)
Assembly and Roll-Out - assemble at station and confirm vehicle responding is 5 minutes
Travel I Arrival on Scene - due to the geographic nature, of the township,
seasonal weather conditions and the proximity of an incident to the location of
the station, a standard timeframe cannot be applied
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 3
Risk Analysis - Station # 2 Hawkestone - Draft April 3/03
Emergency Response Con't ....
The following charts show the average emergency response times for all
Hawkestone area calls (1997-2001) including property fires, pre-fire conditions,
public hazards, rescue I extrication and medical/ resuscitator calls, as outlined in
categories in Section D (pages 3 - 5)
Average Emergency Response Times, 1997-2001
Total Day Night Weekday Weekend
Number of Calls 252 144 108 146 106
Avg. Dispatch Time 2:53 3:09 2:32 2:43 3:08
Avg. Roll-Out Time 2:16 2:18 2:13 2:25 2:04
(% under 5 minutes) 92% 90% 94% 88% 96%
Avg. Travel Time 5:49 5:33 6:10 5:35 6:08
Avg. Total Response 10:58 11:00 10:55 10:42 11:20
Time
Tones Complete Until on Scene (under 10 minutes, between 10-15 minutes,
over 15 minutes), 1997-2001
Average Day Night Weekday Weekend
Under 10 Minutes 78% 74% 83% 77% 79%
10 & 15 Minutes 17% 21% 13% 18% 17%
Over 15 Minutes 5% 5% 4% 5% 4%
All Stations Summary
Total Day Night Weekday Weekend
Number of Calls 1115 624 491 678 437
Avg. Dispatch Time 3:01 3:06 2:54 2:57 3:10
Roll-Out Time 2:58 3:05 2:49 3:05 2:52
(% under 5 minutes) 88% 86% 90% 85% 92%
Avg. Travel Time 5:57 5:50 6:08 5:48 6:11
Avg. Total Response 11:57 12:01 11:51 11:50 12:12
Time
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 4
Risk Analysis - Station # 2 Hawkestone - Draft April 3/03
Emergency Response Can't ....
Associated Risks - Emergency Response Times
- Includes all 1115 calls (1997 - 2001), property fires, pre-fire conditions, public
hazards, rescue / extrication and medical/ resuscitator calls.
Hawkestone
Percentage of Total Calls:
- 22.6 % or 252 calls
Dispatch Times (avg. 2:53):
- all times are over the acceptable 90 seconds, but with the exception of the
daytime average of 3:09, times are lower than the all station average of 3:01
Roll Out Times (avg. 2:16):
- are all shorter than the all station average which is 2:58
Travel Times (avg. 5:49):
- are lower, with the exception of the night-time average which is within 5
seconds of the all station average of 5:57
Total Response Times (avg. 10:58):
- lower than the all station average which is 11 :57
Tones Complete Until On Scene:
- Personnel and Apparatus on the scene within 10 minutes in an average of
78% of all calls
There is no potential risk to the area serviced by Hawkestone Station. However,
ongoing monitoring should be carried out to review the dispatch times, which are
higher than the acceptable 90 seconds. Travel times are also high and are due
in part to the number of calls along the Highway 11 corridor. For additional
information regarding travel times see Call Volume Analysis and Proximity to
Incident Data on pages 6-7.
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 5
Risk Analysis - Station # 2 Hawkestone - Draft April 3/03
Fi re Station - Hawkestone
The following data refers to:
- the location of station with respect to the incidents it responds to
- analysis of incidents by volume and locations
- station personnel - volunteer firefighters
- facilities, apparatus and equipment
Location
Close to:
. designated growth areas (246 lots)
. older settlement areas
. high density - majority of the waterfront
. highway 11 ( majority )
. easily accessible for the majority of the volunteer firefighters
. marina
Not close to:
. airport
. industrial parks
. most agriculture
. gardening center
Call Volume Analysis
Year
Highway 11
Lakeshore Road Ridge Road
1997 21 6 1
1998 12 10 4
1999 27 8 3
2000 27 9 2
2001 21 9 2
1997-2001 108 42 12
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 6
Risk Analysis - Station # 2 Hawkestone - Draft April 3/03
Fire Station - Hawkestone Can't .....
Station Personnel - Volunteer Fire Fighters
Full personnel compliment is 16 volunteer firefighters per station. Through the recruitment
process, measures are taken to maintain full compliment (see page 5, section A, of
Background). The chart below showing the average number of firefighters on scene is based
on all incidents including property fires, pre-fire conditions, public hazards, rescue I extrication
and medical I resuscitator calls, as outlined in categories in Section D (pages 3 - 5).
Station #2 - Host Station (host station firefighters only)
y
#FF'
A
o
N' ht
W kD
W knd
ear . 5 Mg. ay Ilgl ee-ay eee
1997 16 7 6 8 6 8
1998 16 6 5 6 5 6
1999 17 6 6 7 6 7
2000 17 7 5 9 6 7
2001 16 6 5 6 6 6
1997-2001 6 5 7 6 7
6 of 16 firefighters mayor may not be an acceptable level of response based on all calls
(as outlined above) due to the nature of the calls as follows:
. a structure fire is automatically a multi station response (minimum 2 station
response)
· a burning complaint call can usually be handled by 1 or 2 personnel
· all other calls (carbon monoxide, rescue I medical etc.) are responded to by at least
1 apparatus canying 1 personnel
Day-time response for Hawkestone is lower than night-time and weekend, but has
remained consistent over the 5 year period and is not related to the yearly compliment
fluctuations.
The number of firefighters on scene are assessed and adjusted by Incident Command
personnel to ensure sufficient firefighters are present as the incident dictates.
Additionally, this information is tracked and monitored on a continuous basis to provide
insight into staffing availability and needs.
Additional information regarding staffing implications will be covered in general by a
portion of this risk analysis addressing staffing issues relative to the whole department.
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 8
Risk Analysis - Station # 2 Hawkestone - Draft April 3/03
Fire Station - Hawkestone Can't.....
Location of Incidents
. Highway 11, Lakeshore Road and Ridge Road accountfor 162 or 64% of the
252 calls (1997-2001)
. the remaining 90 or 36% of calls were centered in the village of Hawkestone
and various subdivisions off Lakeshore Road and Ridge Road ( including
eight mile point area )
Proximity of Station to Incident and Accessibility
. incidents occurring on Ridge Road and in the village of Hawkestone and most
sections of Highway 11 are easiest to respond to
. incidents on Woodland Drive are the most time consuming
. incidents on the Highway 11 corridor, in particular southbound lanes from
Memorial Ave. to Line 11 require additional travel time (may need to go north
to go south)
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 7
Risk Analysis - Station # 2 Hawkestone - Draft April 3/03
Fire Station - Hawkestone Con't ......
Facility, Apparatus and Equipment
Facility
. no room to accommodate the air boat
. no emergency power
Apparatus and Equipment
(see section B of the background materials)
OFM recommends front line apparatus (pumper, tanker) be replace every 15 years.
Oro-Medonte reviews apparatus replacement every 20 - 25 years depending on
condition and repair costs.
Based on this 20 - 25 year life span and monitored on an annual basis the following
evaluations have been made regarding replacement of apparatus and equipment.
. Pumper - due for replacement 2003
. Tanker - currently being replaced
. Equipment e.g. hose, breathing apparatus etc is sufficient
. Rescue Van 1 is housed at this station (with equipment e.g. jaws of life, positive
pressure ventilation fans etc). In addition to its' own area it responds to Stations 1
and 4 incidents and to a part of Station 5 area, as well as being called upon to
attend/assist anywhere else in the township as required.
. Air boat is housed at this station during the winter months
The apparatus is in good working order and there is no need for additions based on
potential risk, projected growth or breakdown. Replacement time frames provide
sufficient time under the capital expenditure policy/procedure that is currently in place.
Equipment is assessed for wear on an on-going basis and replaced as required to meet
applicable standards, needs and circumstances.
Associated Potential Risks - Hawkestone Fire Station
Station Location
those areas that are closest to the station (eg. older settlement areas, and most
waterfront) are at less risk than those properties along Highway 11 corridor from
Forest Home, southbound to line 11, and properties along Woodland Drive and in
Forest Home Industrial Park due to travel time and highway access.
Call Volume Analysis and Incident Location
there is reason for concern regarding the number of incidents along some parts of
the highway 11 corridor due to the increased travel time in reaching these calls.
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 9
Risk Analysis - Station # 2 Hawkestone - Draft April 3/03
Fire Station - Hawkestone Con't ......
Station Personnel
response numbers are good based on a database of all calls (structure fires,
burning complaints and medical assist calls etc.), however this indicates the need
to maintain a minimum compliment of 16 firefighters to ensure an average of 6 or 7
on scene
Facility
the lack of room for additional apparatus (particularly the airboat) causes difficulty in
mobilizing the pumper, tanker and rescue van which causes reason for concern
lack of emergency power does not present a potential risk at this time
Apparatus and Equipment
based on the replacement criteria (standards, needs, circumstances and the
corporate procedures) there is no potential risk with regard to apparatus and
equipment at this time
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 10
Risk Analysis - Station # 2 Hawkestone - Draft April 3/03
Water
Water sources for the purpose of fire protection are identified as being used year
round e.g. hydrants** and holding tanks. All other sources are considered static
and mayor may not be easily accessible year round e.g. frozen over or not easy
to locate due to snow cover. Private sources were not included in the mapping
process but some are mentioned in this analysis.
**Hydrants are considered in two categories, credited and non-credited.
. Credited - meets fire flow requirements of minimum 400 gallons per minute
. Non-credited - all others that don't meet the requirement
In addition to these water sources the tankers and pumpers can transport water
quickly to the fire scene and be used until other sources are identified. Mutual
aid can also be accessed if required to supply water.
Locations
Hydrants
. Credit Hydrants - permission to use City of Orillia hydrants at borders
Non-credited
. Cedarbrook Crescent (ViUage of Hawkestone)
Static Water Sources
Pumper Accessible
. Lines 7,9 & 11 (at Lake Simcoe)
. Carthew Bay
. Woodland Drive (multiple locations e.g. lake, pond, creeks)
Portable Pump Accessible (good & fair sources)
. Along lakeshore
. Unes 10,14 & 15 (at lake)
.- 15/16 Side Road (east Oro)
. Woodland
Oro-Medonte Fire. and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 11
Risk Analysis - Station #:2f;awkestone - Draft April 3/03
Water continued.....
Availability of sources to high risk areas
Readily available to:
. Waterfront, built up areas, high density public areas
Not readily available to:
. Airport, dryland marinas and the industrial parks
Due to the lack of water along the highway 11 corridor between Lines 7 & 15, the
Fire and Emergency Services could have difficulty fighting a fire at the airport and
through to Forest Home. This would include any highway incidents/accidents
and would be further complicated by the difficulties in accessing the highway
because of the overpasses.
In addition, due to the size and type of businesses occupying the Forest Home
Industrial Park e.g. fuel storage, marinas etc, there is a potentially higher level of
risk related to loss of life and property associated with the lack of water in this
area.
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 12
Risk Analysis - Station # 2 Hawkestone - Draft April 3/03
Roads
Fire and Emergency Services need to be able to access all areas of the township
in order to meet the level of services expected and required of them.
Provincial Roads
Highway 11
. difficulty accessing the highway because of the overpasses e.g. may have to
go south in order to go north
County Roads
. in good condition and easily accessible for emergency
Municipal Roads
. Responses are hindered because the following roads are not fully
accessible/open
. Road allowance between Simcoe Side and Hawkestone (lines 10-11)
. Robinson into Lakeshore between Lines 11-12 is not open
. 8th Line is not extended to the lakeshore from Tudhope Blvd
Trail System
. Accessible for most emergency vehicles
There is a potential risk related to loss of life and property due to the difficulty in
accessing some properties where the roads are open to through traffic.
Qro.,.MedQJ1te.Rre and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 13
Risk AnaJysis - Station # 2 Hawkestone - Draft April 3/03
Communications
Two-way radio communication is available through emergency vehicles and all
officers.
Volunteer Fire Fighters rely on pagers only (one way communication) until roll out
in the emergency vehicles.
Concerns:
There are some difficulties with pager and portable radio response due in part to
the effects of reception pockets. Spectrum Management, under Industry Canada,
has set a deadline of 2004 for the re-alignment of band width, which will correct
this problem.
In some areas of the township there are still 4 party party-lines which means that
residents must call directly to the Barrie Fire Control Dispatch Center instead of
using the enhanced 9-1-1 system. If the resident dials 9-1-1 they may reach
another dispatch center other than Barrie because of the trunk line system. This
means delays in response while the correct fire department is identified and then
notified. There is currently no information available regarding if or when Bell
Canada will correct this situation.
Only the 9-1-1 vs. call direct issue could PO$e a potential risk.
{)ro-Medonte Fke and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 14
Risk Analysis - Station # 2 Hawkestone - Draft Apr;t 3/03
.
Tourism
Given that the township is promoting tourism and recreation through its'
brochures, due consideration should be given to the impact any increased
activity will have on the fire and Emergency Services Department.
In addition to the Parks and Recreation Master Plan (completed 1997) the
Township has completed a Parkland Secondary Study that will be beneficial in
providing further details regarding future direction in tourism/recreation.
Outlined below are the activities that currently take place in the Hawkestone
response area that can result in potential risk for the township with regarding to
hazmat, fire, response times etc. for medical and public assistance calls including
cold water / ice rescue and remote search and rescue.
. Water front - year round
. Ball diamonds - tournaments
. Golf
. Agritourism
. Special events park
· Additional use of highways as tourists pass through or $lay in the area
. Increased use of airport
· Lake Country Oro-Medonte Rail Trail
Based on the volume of incidents along Highway 11 corridor there is reason for
concern regarding potential risk, but further monitorirlg as to w~ and. when the
incidents occw' should be carried out before determining the effects of increased
tourism.
'~TUPDATE .......ApriI3. f003
Oro--Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 15
R"'f$k Analysis - Station # 2 Hawkestone - Draft April 3/03 .
.
Fire and Emergency Services Department
Master Plan
Risk Analysis By Station
Station # 3 Horseshoe Valley
Area of coverage 16,258 Hectares
Community (see building stock breakdown on page 11, section C, of background)
Exposure to potential risk -
Listed below are buildings and properties that expose the community to a potentially
higher level of risk than normal and could result in death or environmental damage. The
level of risk for incident is related to building/property content or the unknown factors
(e.g. vehicles using Horseshoe Valley Road, Penetanguishene Road, Old Barrie Road
and Highway 400 ). Emergency response to these incidents could include Fire, Medical
Assist, Hazmat and I or Rescue.
. Pipeline
. Railway
. High Rise Buildings (condos & resort)
. Simcoe County Forests
. Copeland Forest
. Auto Repair
. Row Housing
. 400 Highway
. Horseshoe Valley Road
. Penetanguishene Road
. Old Barrie Road
. Agriculture (chemical storage and use)
. Aggregate ( storage I haulage)
. Garden Center
Economic Impact
Listed below are those buildings or properties that expose the community to a
potentially higher level of risk and could result in loss of jobs, loss of revenue,
loss of property or loss of tax base. The potential risk is related to
building/property content or the unknown factors (e.g. vehicles using Horseshoe
Valley Road, Penetanguishene Road, Old Barrie Road and Highway 400 ).
. Resorts
. Commercial and industrial
. Pipeline
. Railway
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 1
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 3 Horseshoe Valley - Draft April 3/03
.
Growth and Population (Community Profile pages 34 - 36)
Based on the Official Plan (1997) the Township of Oro-Medonte is expected to increase
in population by a projected 10,181 over a 20 year period or by 2016. In 1996 the
population was 16,698 (Census Canada) and has now increased to 18,315 (2001
Census) or by 9%.
There is no accurate formula (at present) to determine the population by response area,
however statistics have given us some age group data to consider. Approximately 25%
of the total population (18,315) are over 55 years of age, 32% are under 25, and the
remaining 43% are between 25 and 54.
Age Group 2001
0-4 years = 5.2%
5 - 14 years = 14.5%
15 -19 years = 7.3%
20 - 24 years = 4.9 %
25 - 44 years = 27.0 %
45 - 54 years = 16.5 %
55 - 64 years = 11.6 %
65 - 74 years = 7.8 %
75 - 84 years = 5,2%
Age Group 2016
15 - 19 years
20 - 29 years
30 - 34 years
35 - 39 years
40 - 59 years
60 - 69 years
70 - 79 years
80 - 89 years
90 - 99 years
From a risk management perspective the seniors (over 55) and the young people (under
25) can benefit from strong Fire Prevention and Public Education programs which would
reduce incidents in the future. The current number of medical assist calls (which will
escalate with the tiered response program) is due in part to the large seniors population
and affects some stations more than others. This type of call will potentially increase as
the 45 to 54 group ages.
According to the Community Profile, building permits across the township are in line with
past averages from 1980 to 1996 of 136 per year. From 1997 to 2001 there have been
an average of 129 residential building permits, 5 commercial permits, 1 industrial permit,
35 multi-dwelling permits per year.
Horseshoe Valley Highlights
This area has approximately 1,402 approved residential lots (some are under
construction). All are in the Horseshoe Valley corridor and Edgar area.
The current number of approved lots could elevate the level of risk with regard to
number of calls for all types of incidents. The mix of seniors and young families provides
an excellent opportunity to promote a wide range of Fire prevention and Public
Education programs
Information highlighted and analyzed above could change based on the outcomes of the
Official Plan review in 2003 or the Craighurst Secondary Plan.
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 2
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 3 Horseshoe Valley - Draft April 3/03
Emergency Response - Host Station - Horseshoe Valley
This is the time frame from a call being received by dispatch through to the
arrival of the first host station emergency vehicle and personnel on the scene of
the incident. This process involves the following:
Dispatch
. call received by dispatch
. dispatch tones out
Assembly and Roll-Out
. assembly at station
· leaving the station and confirming vehicle response (some firefighters will go
directly to the incident in their own vehicle)
Travel
. travel time to scene
. arrival on scene
. notify dispatch that host station is on scene
The working committee established the following time lines as being
acceptable:
Dispatch - call received to tones complete 1 % minutes (as per NFPA Standard 12-21)
Assembly and Roll-Out - assemble at station and confirm vehicle responding is 5 minutes
Travel I Arrival on Scene - due to the geographic nature, of the township,
seasonal weather conditions and the proximity of an incident to the location of
the station, a standard timeframe cannot be applied
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 3
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 3 Horseshoe Valley - Draft April 3/03
Emergency Response Con't ....
The following charts show the average emergency response times for all
Horseshoe calls (1997-2001) including property fires, pre-fire conditions, public
hazards, rescue I extrication and medical I resuscitator calls, as outlined in
categories in Section D (pages 3 - 5)
Average Emergency Response Times, 1997-2001
Total Day Night Weekday Weekend
Number of Calls 216 116 100 124 92
AVQ. Dispatch Time 2:47 2:48 2:45 2:41 2:54
Avg. Roll-Out Time 4:06 4:26 3:44 4:04 4:09
(% under 5 minutes) 77% 73% 82% 73% 83%
Avg. Travel Time 5:04 4:44 5:28 4:50 5:24
Avg. Total Response 11:58 11:58 11:57 11:35 12:28
Time
Tones Complete Until on Scene (under 10 minutes, between 10-15 minutes,
over 15 minutes), 1997-2001
Average Day Night Weekday Weekend
Under 10 Minutes 64% 65% 63% 65% 63%
10 & 15 Minutes 29% 30% 27% 30% 27%
Over 15 Minutes 7% 5% 10% 5% 10%
All Stations Summary
Total Day Night Weekday Weekend
Number of Calls 1115 624 491 678 437
Avg. Dispatch Time 3:01 3:06 2:54 2:57 3:10
Roll-Out Time 2:58 3:05 2:49 3:05 2:52
(% under 5 minutes) 88% 86% 90% 85% 92%
Avg. Travel Time 5:57 5:50 6:08 5:48 6:11
Avg. Total Response 11:57 12:01 11 :51 11:50 12:12
Time
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 4
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 3 Horseshoe Valley - Draft April 3/03
Emergency Response Can't....
Associated Risks - Emergency Response Times
- Includes all 1115 calls (1997 - 2001), property fires, pre-fire conditions, public
hazards, rescue / extrication and medical/resuscitator calls.
Horseshoe Vallev
Percentage of Total Calls:
- 21.6 % or 216 calls
Dispatch Times (avg. 2:47):
- all times are over the acceptable 90 seconds, but lower than the all station
average which is 3:01
Roll Out Times (avg. 4:06):
all higher than the all station average of 2:58
Travel Times (avg. 5:04):
lower than the all station average of 5:57
Total Response Times (avg. 11 :58):
in line with all station average, with weekend average being higher, but within
30 seconds ofthe all station average which is 11 :57
Tones Complete Until On Scene:
Personnel and Apparatus on the scene within 10 minutes in an average of
64% of all calls
Total response time is in line with all station average but roll out time is much
higher. There is some indication that this is due to the availability of volunteer
firefighters, see pages 8 & 10. Dispatch times are also over the acceptable 90
seconds and should be monitored
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 5
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 3 Horseshoe Valley - Draft April 3/03
Fire Station - Horseshoe
The following data refers to:
- the location of station with respect to the incidents it responds to
analysis of incidents by volume and locations
station personnel - volunteer firefighters
facilities, apparatus and equipment
Location
Close to:
. designated growth areas (1402 lots)
. some resorts
. row housing
. forests
. Horseshoe Valley Road
Not close to:
. Railway
. Penetanguishene Road
. Highway 400
. Old Barrie Road
. some resorts
. Agriculture
. majority of volunteer firefighters
Call Volume Analysis
Year Highland Drive Penetanguishene Road Horseshoe Valley Rd.
1997 13 5 8
1998 10 2 12
1999 4 3 9
2000 58 3 8
2001 17 5 11
1997-2001 102 20 48
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 6
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 3 Horseshoe Valley - Draft April 3/03
Fire Stations - Horseshoe Con't .....
Location of Incidents
. Highland Drive, Penetanguishene Road and Horseshoe Valley Road account
for 78% or 170 calls of the 216 calls ( 1997 - 2001 )
. The remaining 22% or 46 calls were throughout the rest of the response area
with the majority being in the Highland and Sugar Bush subdivisions and
along Old Barrie Road.
Proximity of Station to Incident and Accessibilitv
. Incidents occurring in the Highland and Sugar Bush subdivisions and the
Horseshoe Valley corridor from line 9 to the entrance to the Horseshoe Valley
Resort are easiest to respond to.
. Those incidents west of the resort are more difficult to respond to due to
the uphill terrain and the seasonal weather conditions. ( this would include most
calls on Penetanguishene Road ). Additionally some portions of Old Barrie Road
are more difficult to access because of travel distance.
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 7
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 3 Horseshoe Valley - Draft April 3/03
Fire Stations - Horseshoe Con't .....
Station Personnel - Volunteer Fire Fighters
Full personnel compliment is 16 volunteer firefighters per station. Through the
recruitment process, measures are taken to maintain full compliment (see page 5,
section A, of Background). The chart below showing the average number of firefighters
on scene is based on all incidents including property fires, pre-fire conditions, public
hazards, rescue! extrication and medical! resuscitator calls, as outlined in categories in
Section 0 (pages 3 - 5).
Station #3 - Host Station (host station firefighters only)
Year # F.F.'s
Avg.
Day
Night
Week-Day
Weekend
1997 15 4 3 6 3 5
1998 16 4 4 5 4 5
1999 16 4 4 5 4 5
2000 14 4 3 5 4 5
2001 17 5 4 6 5 6
1997-2001 4 4 5 4 5
4 of 16 firefighters mayor may not be an acceptable level of response based on all calls
(as outlined above) due to the nature of the calls as follows:
. a structure fire is automatically a multi station response ( minimum of 2 station
response)
. a burning complaint call can usually be handled by 1 or 2 personnel
. all other calls (carbon monoxide, rescue! medical etc.) are responded to by at least
1 apparatus carrying 1 personnel
Week day! daytime responses are lower than nights and weekends, however the
numbers have remained consistent but some years have been affected by the drop in
the yearly compliment of firefighters.
The number of firefighters on scene are assessed and adjusted by Incident Command
personnel to ensure sufficient firefighters are present as the incident dictates.
Additionally, this information is tracked and monitored on a continuous basis to provide
insight into staffing availability and needs.
Additional information regarding staffing implications will be covered in general by a
portion of this risk analysis addressing staffing issues relative to the whole department.
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 8
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 3 Horseshoe Valley - Draft April 3/03
Fire Station - Horseshoe Con't....
Facility, Apparatus and Equipment
Facility
. No concerns - except for cautionary note regarding exhaust fumes
Apparatus and Equipment
(see section B of the background materials)
OFM recommends front line apparatus (pumper, tanker) be replaced every 15
years. Oro-Medonte reviews apparatus replacement every 20 - 25 years
depending on condition and repair costs.
Based on this 20 - 25 year life span and monitored on an annual basis the
following evaluations have been made regarding replacement of apparatus and
equipment.
. Pumper - due for replacement 2018
. Tanker - has been refurbished and due for replacement 2007
. Ladder Truck - has been refurbished and due for replacement 2016
. Equipment e.g. hose, breathing apparatus etc is sufficient
. Rescue Vans 1 and/or 2 respond to Station 3 incidents (with equipment e.g.
jaws of life, positive pressure ventilation fans etc)
. The cache for Simcoe County Forest fire fighting is kept at Station 3
. All Terrain Vehicle with trailer is housed at this station for use by all stations
. The air boat is housed at this station during off season (spring, summer, fall )
The apparatus is in good working order and there is no need for additions based
on potential risk, projected growth or breakdown. Replacement time frames
provide sufficient time under the capital expenditure policy/procedure that is
currently in place.
Equipment is assessed for wear on an on-going basis and replaced as required
to meet applicable standards, needs and circumstances.
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 9
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 3 Horseshoe Valley - Draft April 3/03
Fire Station - Horseshoe Con't...
Associated Potential Risks - Horseshoe Fire Station
Station Location
- those areas closest to the station i.e. Highland Drive, Cathedral Pines, Sugar
Bush etc. and other subdivisions off of the Horseshoe Valley corridor are at
less potential risk than those areas along Penetanguishene Road, parts of Old
Barrie Road and 15/16 side road and Horseshoe Valley Road west of the
resort entrance due to distance
Call Volume Analysis and Incident Location
- there is reason for concern regarding the number of calls along Horseshoe
Valley Road, however monitoring should be carried out to determine the
number of calls west of the resort entrance because of the difficulty involved
in negotiating the steep hills
incidents in the subdivisions surrounding the station are at a much lower risk
because of their close proximity
NOTE: Although there was a spike in calls to Highland Drive in 2000, the
cause has been addressed and corrected
Station Personnel
response numbers are slightly lower than other stations based on a database
of all calls ( structure fires, burning complaints, medical assist calls etc. ) This
indicates the need to maintain a compliment of at least 16 firefighters and
further review should be given to the staffing requirements based on
availability (shift work and work location etc.)
Facility
no potential risk at this time
Apparatus and Equipment
based on the replacement criteria (standards, needs, circumstances and the
corporate procedures) there is no potential risk with regard to apparatus and
equipment at this time
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 10
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 3 Horseshoe Valley - Draft April 3/03
Water
Water sources for the purpose of fire protection are identified as being used year
round e.g. hydrants** and holding tanks. All other sources are considered static
and mayor may not be easily accessible year round e.g. frozen over or not easy
to locate due to snow cover. Private sources were not included in the mapping
process but some are mentioned in this analysis.
**Hydrants are considered in two categories, credited and non-credited.
· Credited - meets fire flow requirements of minimum 400 gallons per minute
· Non-credited - all others that don't meet the requirement
In addition to these water sources the tankers and pumpers can transport water
quickly to the fire scene and be used until other sources are identified. Mutual
aid can also be accessed if required to supply water.
Locations
Hydrants
· credited hydrants are located south side of Horseshoe Valley Rd between
Lines 3 &4 (Highlands and resort area) and 6 & 7 (Sugarbush)
· holding tank with automatic filling system is between Lines 4 &5 south of
Horseshoe Valley Rd (Oro Hills)
· holding tank with automatic filling system is at Bidwell Road, between Line 1
and Penetanguishene Road ( Simcoe Estates)
· non-credited hydrants at Craighurst and between Lines 3 & 5 (Pineridge on
north side of Horseshoe Valley Road)
· non-credited system at Edgar Center ( Adult Occupational Center)
Static Water Sources
Pumper Accessible
· on Lines 6 & 7 at top and bottom of area
Portable Pump Accessible (good sources)
· Line 7 north and south of Horseshoe Valley Rd (Coulson)
· near Lines 3 & 4 south of Horseshoe Valley Rd (Oro Hills)
· Copeland Forest for forest fire only and only accessible from Ingram Rd.
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 11
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 3 Horseshoe Valley - Draft April 3/03
Water continued...
Availability of sources to high risk areas
Readily available to:
. Horseshoe Valley community, some agriculture, parts of Simcoe County and
Copeland Forests and Simcoe Estates
Not readily available to:
. Some parts of the railway, most of the agriculture, some parts of the forests
Due to the lack of water it could be more difficult to contain/fight fires in the
following areas:
. from Penetanguishene Road to Line 7 between Bass Lake Side Road and
Old Barrie Road
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master 12
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 3 Horseshoe Valley - Draft April 3/03
Roads
Fire and Emergency Services need to be able to access all areas of the township
in order to meet the level of services expected and required of them.
Provincial Roads
Highway 400
· good condition and good accessibility off of Horseshoe Valley Rd for Station 3
response area
County Roads
Penetanguishene Road (Highway 93)
. good condition and good accessibility
County Rd 22 (Horseshoe Valley Rd)
. hills can be difficult (particularly in the winter)
County Rd 11 (Old Barrie Rd)
. good condition and good accessibility
Trail System
. Through the Simcoe County Forest
· The only vehicle that can get into the trails is the A TV, which is limited to
summer access only.
The only potential risk, at this time is related to accessing Simcoe County and
Copeland Forest trail systems.
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 13
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 3 Horseshoe Valley - Draft April 3/03
Communications
Two-way radio communications is available through emergency vehicles and all
officers.
Volunteer Fire Fighters rely on pagers only (one way communication) until roll out
in the emergency vehicles.
Concerns:
There are some difficulties with pager and portable radio response due in part to
the effects of reception pockets. Spectrum Management, under Industry Canada,
has set a deadline of 2004 for the re-alignment of band width, which will correct
this problem.
In some areas of the township there are still 4 party party-lines which means that
residents must call directly to the Barrie Fire Control Dispatch Center instead of
using the enhanced 9-1-1 system. If the resident dials 9-1-1 they may reach
another dispatch center other than Barrie because of the trunk line system. This
means delays in response while the correct fire department is identified and then
notified. There is currently no information available regarding if or when Bell
Canada will correct this situation.
Only the 9-1-1 VS. call direct issue could pose a potential risk.
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 14
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 3 Horseshoe Valley - Draft April 3/03
Tourism
Given that the township is promoting tourism and recreation through its'
brochures, due consideration should be given to the impact any increased
activity will have on the fire and Emergency Services Department.
In addition to the Parks and Recreation Master Plan (completed 1997) the
Township has completed a Parkland Secondary Study that will be beneficial in
providing further details regarding future direction in tourism/recreation.
Outlined below are the activities that currently take place in the Horseshoe Valley
response area that can result in potential risk for the township with regard to
response times etc. for medical and public assistance calls including cold water I
ice rescue and remote search and rescue.
. Cross Country and Downhill Skiing
. Groomed and un-groomed year round trails (resorts and forests)
. Golf
. Miscellaneous resort activities and events
. Biking
There is some reason for concern regarding the number of incidents along
Horseshoe Valley Road and Penetanguishene Road, however further monitoring
is required to determine the effects of tourism related activities on these figures.
DRAFT UPDATE .........April3, 2003
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 15
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 3 Horseshoe Valley - Draft April 3/03
Fire and Emergency Services Department
Master Plan
Risk Analysis By Station
Station # 4 Rugby
Area of coverage 8,290 Hectares
Community (see building stock breakdown on page 12, section C of background)
Exposure to potential risk -
Listed below are buildings and properties that expose the community to a
potentially higher level of risk than normal and could result in death or
environmental damage. The level of risk for incident is related to building/property
content or the unknown factors (e.g. vehicles using Old Barrie Road). Emergency
response to these incidents would include Fire, Medical Assist, Hazmat and / or
Rescue.
. 2 mobile home parks
· Agriculture (chemical storage and use)
. Auto Repair
. Auto Wrecking Yard
. Pipelines
. Sawmill
. Woodworking
. Old Barrie Rd
. County Forest
. Bass Lake Provincial Park
. Aggregates (storage and haulage)
Economic Impact
Listed below are those buildings or properties that expose the community to a
potentially higher level of risk and could result in loss of jobs, loss of revenue,
loss of property or loss of tax base. The potential risk is related to
building/property content or the unknown factors (e.g. vehicles using Old Barrie
Road).
. Pipeline
. Mobile home parks
. Aggregates
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 1
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 4 Rugby- DRAFT April 3/03
Growth and Population (Community Profile pages 34 - 36)
Based on the Official Plan (1997) the Township of Oro-Medonte is expected to increase
in population by a projected 10,181 over a 20 year period or by 2016. In 1996 the
population was 16,698 (Census Canada) and has now increased to 18,315 (2001
Census) or by 9%.
There is no accurate formula (at present) to determine the population by response area,
however statistics have given us some age group data to consider. Approximately 25%
of the total population (18,315) are over 55 years of age, 32% are under 25, and the
remaining 43% are between 25 and 54.
Age Group 2001
o - 4 years = 5.2%
5 - 14 years = 14.5%
15 - 19 years = 7.3%
20 - 24 years = 4.9 %
25 - 44 years = 27.0 %
45 - 54 years = 16.5 %
55 - 64 years = 11.6 %
65 -74 years = 7.8 %
75 - 84 years = 5.2%
Age Group 2016
15 - 19 years
20 - 29 years
30 - 34 years
35 - 39 years
40 - 59 years
60 - 69 years
70 - 79 years
80 - 89 years
90 - 99 years
From a risk management perspective the seniors (over 55) and the young people (under
25) can benefit from strong Fire Prevention and Public Education programs which would
reduce incidents in the future. The current number of medical assist calls (which will
escalate with the tiered response program) is due in part to the large seniors population
and affects some stations more than others. This type of call will potentially increase as
the 45 to 54 group ages.
According to the Community Profile, building permits across the township are in line with
past averages from 1980 to 1996 of 136 per year. From 1997 to 2001 there have been
an average of 129 residential building permits, 5 commercial permits, 1 industrial permit,
35 multi-dwelling permits per year.
Rugby
This area has approximately 58 approved residential lots (some of which are under
construction).
The current number of approved lots does not pose a risk, but the large seniors
population and its projected increase places additional demands on the services due to
the medical assist calls.
The information highlighted and analyzed above could change based on the outcome of
the Official Plan review in 2003.
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 2
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 4 Rugby- DRAFT April 3/03
Emergency Response - Host Station - Rugby
This is the time frame from a call being received by dispatch through to the
arrival of the first host station emergency vehicle and personnel on the scene of
the incident. This process involves the following:
Dispatch
. call received by dispatch
. dispatch tones out
Assemblv and Roll-Out
. assembly at station
. leaving the station and confirming vehicle response (some firefighters will go
directly to the incident in their own vehicle)
Travel
. travel time to scene
. arrival on scene
. notify dispatch that host station is on the scene
The working committee established the following time lines as being
acceptable:
Dispatch - call received to tones complete 1 % minutes (as per NFPA Standard 12-21)
Assembly and Roll-Out - assemble at station and confirm vehicle responding is 5 minutes
Travel I Arrival on Scene - due to the geographic nature, of the township,
seasonal weather conditions and the proximity of an incident to the location of
the station, a standard timeframe cannot be applied
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 3
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 4 Rugby- DRAFT April 3/03
Emergency Response Con't ....
The following charts show the average emergency response times for all calls
(1997-2001) including property fires, pre-fire conditions, public hazards,
rescue / extrication and medical/ resuscitator calls, as outlined in categories in
Section D (pages 3 - 5)
Average Emergency Response Times, 1997-2001
Total Day Night Weekday Weekend
Number of Calls 88 47 41 64 24
Avg. Dispatch Time 3:34 3:39 3:28 3:20 4:10
Avg. Roll-Out Time 2:13 1:44 2:48 1:59 2:52
(% under 5 minutes) 94% 94% 95% 94% 96%
Ava. Travel Time 5:23 5:32 5:12 5:18 5:36
Avg. Total Response 11:10 10:54 11:28 10:37 12:38
Time
Tones Complete Until on Scene (under 10 minutes, between 10-15 minutes,
over 15 minutes), 1997-2001
Average Day Night Weekday Weekend
Under 10 Minutes 83% 83% 83% 86% 75%
10 & 15 Minutes 12% 13% 12% 12% 12%
Over 15 Minutes 5% 4% 5% 2% 13%
All Stations Summary
Total Day Night Weekday Weekend
Number of Calls 1115 624 491 678 437
Avg. Dispatch Time 3:01 3:06 2:54 2:57 3:10
Roll-Out Time 2:58 3:05 2:49 3:05 2:52
(% under 5 minutes) 88% 86% 90% 85% 92%
Ava. Travel Time 5:57 5:50 6:08 5:48 6:11
Avg. Total Response 11:57 12:01 11:51 11:50 12:12
Time
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 4
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 4 Rugby- DRAFT April 3/03
Emergency Response Con't ....
Associated Risks - Emergency Response Times
- Includes al/1115 calls (1997 - 2001), property fires, pre-fire conditions, public
hazards, rescue / extrication and medical/ resuscitator calls.
RugbY
percentaqe of Total Calls:
- 7.8% or 88 calls
Dispatch Times (ava. 3:34t
- all times are over the acceptable 90 seconds and are substantially higher
than the all station average of 3:01
Roll Out Times (avA. 2:13):
- although significantly lower during the daytime & weekdays they are in line
with the all station average for nights and weekends. All station average 2:58
Travel Times (ava. 5:23):
- all times are lower than all the all station average of 5:57
Total Response Times (ava. 11:10):
- all times are lower than the all station average of 11 :57
Tones Complete Until On Scene:
- Personnel and Apparatus on the scene within 10 minutes in an average of
83% of all calls
There is no potential risk to the area serviced by Rugby Station, but ongoing
monitoring should be carried out to determine the cause of the exceptiQnally high
dispatch times.
Ora-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 5
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 4 Rugby- DRAFT April 3/03
Fire Station - Rugby
The following data refers to:
- the location of the station with respect to the incidents it responds to
- analysis of incidents by volume and locations
- station personnel - volunteer firefighters
- facilities, apparatus and equipment
Location
Close to:
. Pipelines
. Agriculture
. All mobile home parks
. Auto repair
. Sawmill
· Majority of Volunteer Firefighters
. Aggregates
Call Volume Analysis
Year Old Barrie Road Big Cedar Estates Fergushill Estates
1997 7 5 4
1998 2 3 1
1999 2 3 3
2000 4 6 2
2001 2 2 1
1997-2001 17 19 11
Location of Incidents
· Big Cedar Estates, Old Barrie Road and Fergus Hill Estates account for 54%
or 47 calls of the 88 calls (1997 - 2001)
· The remaining 46% or 41 calls were throughout the rest of the response area
including Forest Home, around Bass Lake and the subdivisions off of Old
Barrie Road.
Proximity of Station to Incident and Accessibility
· All parts of the Rugby response area are easily accessible due to the location
of the station and the road network.
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 6
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 4 Rugby- DRAFT April 3/03
Fire Station - Rugby Can't....
Station Personnel - Volunteer Fire Fighters
Full personnel compliment is 16 volunteer firefighters per station. Through the
recruitment process, measures are taken to maintain full compliment (see page 5
section A of Background). The chart below showing the average number of
firefighters on scene is based on all incidents including property fires, pre-fire
conditions, public hazards, rescue / extrication and medical/ resuscitator calls, as
outlined in categories in Section D (pages 3 - 5).
Station #4 - Host Station (host station firefighters only)
y
#F F'
A
o
N' ht
W kD
W k d
ear . . s vg. ay .g ee - ay ee en
1997 14 5 5 7 5 6
1998 14 7 6 7 6 8
1999 15 6 5 8 6 7
2000 14 7 6 8 7 8
2001 13 6 4 7 4 7
1997-2001 6 5 7 6 7
6 of 16 firefighters mayor may not be an acceptable level of response based on
all calls (as outlined above) due to the nature of the calls as follows:
. a structure fire is automatically a multi station response ( minimum 2 station
response)
. a burning complaint can usually be handled by 1 or 2 personnel
. all other calls (carbon monoxide, rescue/medical etc.) are responded to by at
least 1 apparatus carrying 1 personnel.
Week day / daytime responses are lower than nights and weekends, however the
numbers have remained consistent even though the yearly compliment has
declined and is below the preferred 16 firefighters.
The number of firefighters on scene are assessed and adjusted by Incident
Command personnel to ensure sufficient firefighters are present as the incident
dictates.
Additional information regarding staffing implications will be covered in general
by a portion of this risk analysis addressing staffing issues relative to the whole
department.
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 7
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 4 Rugby- DRAFT April 3/03
Fire Station - Rugby Con't ....
Facility, Apparatus and Equipment
Facility
. no room for additional apparatus
. no emergency power
Apparatus and Equipment
(see section B of the background materials)
OFM recommends front line apparatus (pumper, tanker) be replaced every 15
years. Oro-Medonte reviews apparatus replacement every 20 - 25 years
depending on condition and repair costs.
Based on this 20 - 25 year life span and monitored on an annual basis the
following evaluations have been made regarding replacement of apparatus and
equipment.
. Pumper - due for replacement 2016
. Tanker- due for replacement 2016
. Equipment e.g. hose, breathing apparatus etc is sufficient
. Rescue Van 1 responds to Station 4 incidents (with equipment e.g. jaws of
life, positive pressure ventilation fans etc)
The apparatus is in good working order and there is no need for additions based
on potential risk, projected growth or breakdown. Replacement time frames
provide sufficient time under the capital expenditure policy/procedure that is
currently in place.
Equipment is assessed for wear on an on-going basis and replaced as required to
meet applicable standards, needs and circumstances.
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 8
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 4 Rugby- DRAFT April 3/03
Fire Station - Rugby Con't ....
Associated Potential Risks - Rugbv Fire Station
Station Location
Big Cedar Estates, Fergus Hill Estates and properties along Old Barrie Road
are at less risk than properties located in the northwest and southwest
portions of the response area.
Call Volume Analysis and Incident Location
there is no elevated risk with regard to call volume for this station as the
majority of the calls are located close to the station e.g. Big Cedar, Fergus Hill
and Old Barrie Road.
Station Personnel
although the station compliment is lower than the desired 16 firefighters, the
numbers on scene are good. However, there is still a need to maintain a full
compliment of 16 to ensure ongoing availability.
Facility
the lack of emergency power or the additional room for apparatus does not
present a potential risk at this time.
Apparatus and Equipment
based on the replacement criteria (standards, needs, circumstances and the
corporate procedures) there is not potential risk with regard to apparatus and
equipment at this time.
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 9
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 4 Rugby- DRAFT April 3/03
Water
Water sources for the purpose of fire protection are identified as being used year
round e.g. hydrants** and holding tanks. All other sources are considered static
and mayor may not be easily accessible year round e.g. frozen over or not easy
to locate due to snow cover. Private sources were not included in the mapping
process but some are mentioned in this analysis.
**Hydrants are considered in two categories, credited and non-credited.
. Credited - meets fire flow requirements of minimum 400 gallons per minute
. Non-credited - aU others that don't meet the requirement
In addition to these water sources the tankers and pumpers can transport water
quickly to the fire scene and be used until other sources are identified. Mutual
aid can also be accessed if required to supply water.
Locations
Hydrants
. Holding tank with automatic filling system at Line 9 and Old Barrie Rd.
Static Water Sources
Pumper Access
. Lines 8, 11 & 13 between Old Barrie Rd and 15/16 Side Road
. top of Line 11 (Whibley's Golf Course)
Portable Pump Accessible (good sources)
. Lines 9 & 12 at 15/16 Side Rd
Availability of sources to high risk areas
Readily available to:
Woodworking, sawmill, some agriculture, aggregate, some of the County forests
Not readily available to:
Big Cedar Estates, Fergus Hill Estates and some agriculture
Due to the lack of water, it could be more difficult to contain/fight fires in the
following areas:
. north and south of Bass Lake Side Road (cannot access Langmans
Sanctuary)
. Big Cedar Estates (has hydrant system that cannot be used as is) and Fergus
Hill Estates due to lack of access to Bass Lake year round.
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 10
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 4 Rugby- DRAFT April 3/03
Roads
Fire and Emergency Services need to be able to access all areas of the township
in order to meet the level of services expected and required of them.
Provincial Roads
None
County Roads
County Rd 11 (Old Barrie Rd)
. good condition and good accessibility
Municipal Roads
. good condition and good accessibility
. line 13 to Bass Lake not accessible year round
Private and Un-assumed Roads
. There are several private and un-assumed roads in this area that are difficult
to travel at various times of the year e.g. summer with increased
traffic/parking issues and winter due to lack of plowing.
Trail System
. There are several private trails that are used for snowmobiling only and are
not easily accessible.
There is a potential risk because of the difficulty in accessing some properties
due to un-assumed roads and lack of winter plowing.
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 11
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 4 Rugby- DRAFT April 3/03
Communications
Two-way radio communications is available through emergency vehicles and all
officers.
Volunteer Fire Fighters rely on pagers only (one way communication) until roll out
in the emergency vehicles.
Concerns:
There are some difficulties with pager and portable radio response due in part to
the effects of reception pockets. Spectrum Management, under Industry Canada,
has set a deadline of 2004 for the re-alignment of bandwidth, which will correct
this problem.
In some areas of the township there are still 4 party party-lines which means that
residents must call directly to the Barrie Fire Control Dispatch Center instead of
using the enhanced 9-1-1 system. If the resident dials 9-1-1 they may reach
another dispatch center other than Barrie because of the trunk line system. This
means delays in response while the correct fire department is identified and then
notified. There is currently no information available regarding if or when Bell
Canada will correct this situation.
Only the 9-1-1 vs. call direct issue could pose a potential risk.
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 12
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 4 Rugby- DRAFT April 3/03
Tourism
Given that the township is promoting tourism and recreation through its'
brochures, due consideration should be given to the impact any increased
activity will have on the fire and Emergency Services Department.
In addition to the Parks and Recreation Master Plan (completed 1997) the
township has completed a Parkland Secondary Study that will be beneficial in
providing further details regarding future direction in tourism/recreation.
Outlined below are the activities that currently take place in the Rugby response
area that can result in potential risk for the township with regard to response
times etc. for medical and public assistance calls including cold water / ice
rescue and remote rescues.
. Trails - snowmobile
. Bass Lake Provincial Park
. Waterfront - year round
· Langman's Sanctuary - year round
· Additional use of county and municipal roads as tourist pass through or stay
in the area
There is no reason for concern regarding the impact of tourism on this area at
this time, but further monitoring of incidents will provide insight into this issue.
DRAFT UPDATE........ April 3, 2003
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 13
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 4 Rugby- DRAFT April 3/03
1
~ "
Fire and Emergency Services Department
Master Plan
Risk Analysis By Station
Station # 5 Warminster
Area of coverage 7,612 Hectares
Community (see building stock breakdown on page 13, section C of background)
Exposure to potential risk -
Listed below are buildings and properties that expose the community to a potentially
higher level of risk normal and could result in death or environmental damage. The
level of risk for incident is related to building/property content or the unknown factors
(e.g. vehicles using highway 12). Emergency response to these incidents could
include Fire, Medical Assist, Hazmat and / or Rescue.
. Mobile home park
. Agriculture
. Railway
. Highway 12
. Garden Centre
Economic Impact
Listed below are those buildings or properties that expose the community to a
potentially higher level of risk and could result in loss of jobs, loss of revenue,
loss of property or loss of tax base. The potential risk is related to
building/property content or the unknown factors (e.g. vehicles using highway
12).
. Railway
. Highway 12
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 1
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 5 Warminster - DRAFT April 3/03
Growth and Population (Community Profile pages 34 - 36)
Based on the Official Plan (1997) the Township of Ora-Medonte is expected to
increase in population by a projected 10,181 over a 20 year period or by 2016. In
1996 the population was 16,698 (Census Canada) and has now increased to
18,315 (2001 Census) or by 9%.
There is no accurate formula (at present) to determine the population by
response area, however statistics have given us some age group data to
consider. Approximately 25% of the total population (18,315) are over 55 years of
age, 32% are under 25, and the remaining 43% are between 25 and 54.
Age Group 2001
o - 4 years = 5.2%
5 - 14 years = 14.5%
15 - 19 years = 7.3%
20 - 24 years = 4.9 %
25 - 44 years = 27.0 %
45 - 54 years = 16.5 %
55 - 64 years = 11.6 %
65 -74 years = 7.8 %
75 - 84 years = 5.2%
Age Group 2016
15 -19 years
20 - 29 years
30 - 34 years
35 - 39 years
40 - 59 years
60 - 69 years
70 - 79 years
80 - 89 years
90 - 99 years
From a risk management perspective the seniors (over 55) and the young people
(under 25) can benefit from strong Fire Prevention and Public Education
programs which would reduce incidents in the future. The current number of
medical assist calls (which will escalate with the tiered response program) is due
in part to the large seniors population and affects some stations more than
others. This type of call will potentially increase as the 45 to 54 group ages.
According to the Community Profile, building permits across the township are in
line with past averages from 1980 to 1996 of 136 per year. From 1997 to 2001
there have been an average of 129 residential building permits, 5 commercial
permits, 1 industrial permit, 35 multi-dwelling permits per year.
Warminster Highlights
This area has approximately 400 approved residential lots (some of which are
under construction).
The current number of approved lots does not pose a risk for fire, but would
increase the need for medical/emergency assistance.
The information highlighted and analysed above could change dependant upon
the outcome of the Official Plan review in 2003.
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department. Master Plan 2
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 5 Warminster - DRAFT April 3/03
Emergency Response - Host Station - Warminster
This is the time frame from a call being received by dispatch through to the
arrival of the first host station emergency vehicle and personnel on the scene of
the incident. This process involves the following:
Dispatch
. call received by dispatch
. dispatch tones out
Assemblv and Roll-Out
. assembly at station
. leaving the station and confirming vehicle response (some firefighters will go
directly to the incident in their own vehicle)
Travel
. travel time to scene
. arrival on scene
. notify dispatch that host station is on scene
The working committee established the following time lines as being
acceptable:
Dispatch - call received to tones complete 1 % minutes (as per NFPA Standard 12-21)
Assembly and Roll-Out - assemble at station and confirm vehicle responding is 5 minutes
Travel I Arrival on Scene - due to the geographic nature, of the township,
seasonal weather conditions and the proximity of an incident to the location of
the station, a standard timeframe cannot be applied
Ora-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 3
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 5 Warminster - DRAFT April 3/03
Emergency Response Can't....
The following charts show the average emergency response times for all
Warminster calls (1997-2001) including property fires, pre-fire conditions, public
hazards, rescue I extrication and medical/ resuscitator calls, as outlined in
categories in Section D (pages 3 - 5)
Average Emergency Response Times, 1997-2001
Total Day Night Weekday Weekend
Number of Calls 148 81 67 88 60
Avg. Dispatch Time 3:09 3:19 2:57 3:08 3:10
Avg. Roll-Out Time 3:24 3:28 3:20 3:38 3:04
(% under 5 minutes) 82% 84% 79% 78% 87%
Avg. Travel Time 6:01 6:05 5:55 6:06 5:53
Avg. Total Response 12:34 12:52 12:12 12:52 12:06
Time
Tones Complete Until on Scene (under 10 minutes, between 10-15 minutes,
over 15 minutes), 1997-2001
Average Day Night Weekday Weekend
Under 10 Minutes 64% 62% 66% 60% 68%
10 & 15 Minutes 29% 32% 25% 31% 27%
Over 15 Minutes 7% 6% 9% 9% 5%
All Stations Summary
Total Day Night Weekday Weekend
Number of Calls 1115 624 491 678 437
Avg. Dispatch Time 3:01 3:06 2:54 2:57 3:10
Roll-Out Time 2:58 3:05 2:49 3:05 2:52
(% under 5 minutes) 88% 86% 90% 85% 92%
Avg. Travel Time 5:57 5:50 6:08 5:48 6:11
Avg. Total Response 11:57 12:01 11:51 11:50 12:12
Time
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 4
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 5 Warminster - DRAFT April 3/03
Emergency Response Con't....
Associated Risks - Emergency Response Times
- Includes all 1115 calls (1997 - 2001), property fires, pre-fire conditions, public
hazards, rescue / extrication and medical I resuscitator calls.
Warminster
Percentaae of Total Calls:
13.5 % Or 148 calls
Dispatch Times (ava. 3:09):
- all times are higher than the acceptable 90 seconds, and higher than the all
station average which is 3:01
Roll Out Times (ava. 3:24):
- all times are higher than all station average which is 2:58
Travel Times (ava. 6:01 ):
- in line and within 10 seconds of the aU station average of 5:57
Total Response Times (ava. 12:34):
- all times (with the exception of the weekend average of 12:06) are higher
than the all station average of 11 :57, but within 60 seconds
Tones Complete Until On Scene:
Personnel and Apparatus on the scene within 10 minutes in an average of
64 % of all calls
There is some reason for concern due to higher roll out times and higher total
response times, however, on scene under 10 minutes at 64% is in line with most
other stations. Ongoing monitoring should be carried out to review travel times
which are slightly higher than all station average and dispatch times which are
higher than the acceptable 90 seconds and the all station average. For
additional information regarding travel times see Call Volume Analysis &
Proximity to Incident Data on pages 6-7.
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 5
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 5 Warminster - DRAFT April 3/03
Fire Station - Warminster
The following data refers to:
- the location of station with respect to the incidents it responds to
- analysis of incidents by volume and locations
- station personnel - volunteer firefighters
- facilities, apparatus and equipment
Location
Close to:
. Highway 12
. Some agriculture
. Garden Center
. Majority of Volunteer Firefighters
Not close to:
. Railway
. Mobile home park
. Some agriculture
Call Volume Analvsis
y
ear Highway 12 Horseshoe Vallev Road
1997 7 3
1998 5 4
1999 16 1
2000 9 4
2001 18 6
1997-2001 55 18
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 6
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 5 Warminster - DRAFT April 3/03
Fire Station - Warminster Con't ....
Location of Incidents
. Highway 12 and Horseshoe Valley Road account for 49% or 73 calls of the
148 calls (1997 - 2001)
- The remaining 51% or 75 calls are throughout the rest of the response area,
ego Village of Warminster, around Bass Lake, Orsi Subdivision and Pritchard
Subdivision
Proximity of Station to Incident and Accessibility
. Incidents along the Highway 12 and Horseshoe Valley Road corridor
are easiest to respond to.
- Properties around Bass Lake and the western portion of the response area
are more difficult to reach e.g. cottage roads
Oro.Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department. Master Plan 7
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 5 Warminster - DRAFT April 3/03
Fire Station - Warminster Con't ....
Station Personnel - Volunteer Fire Fighters
Full personnel compliment is 16 volunteer firefighters per station. Through the
recruitment process, measures are taken to maintain full compliment (see page 5 of
Section A, Background). The chart below showing the average number of
firefighters on scene is based on all incidents including property fires, pre-fire
conditions, public hazards, rescue / extrication and medical/ resuscitator calls, as
outlined in categories in Section D (pages 3 - 5).
Station #5 - Host Station (host station firefighters only)
y
#FF'
A
D
N' h
W D
W k d
ear . . s vg. ay .g t eek- ay ee en
1997 13 4 4 5 4 4
1998 14 5 4 7 5 7
1999 14 6 5 6 5 6
2000 14 8 6 9 8 8
2001 17 7 6 8 8 7
1997-2001 6 5 7 6 6
6 of 16 firefighters mayor may not be an acceptable level of response based on
all calls (as outlined above) due to the nature of the calls as follows:
. a structure fire is automatically a multi station response ( minimum 2 station
response)
. a burning complaint call can usually be handled by 1 or 2 personnel
. all other calls (carbon monoxide, rescue / medical etc.) are responded to by at
least 1 apparatus carrying 1 personnel
Daytime response is slightly lower and may be related to the yearly compliment
fluctuation.
The number of firefighters on scene are assessed and adjusted by Incident
Command personnel to ensure sufficient firefighters are present as the incident
dictates. Additionally, this information is tracked and monitored on a continuous
basis to provide insight into staffing availability and needs.
Additional information regarding staffing implications will be covered in general
by a portion of this risk analysis addressing staffing issues relative to the whole
department.
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 8
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 5 Warminster - DRAFT April 3/03
Fire Station - Warminster Con't ....
Facility, Apparatus and Equipment
Facility
. No room for additional apparatus
. No emergency power
. Office space
Apparatus and Equipment
(see section B of the background materials)
OFM recommends front line apparatus (pumper, tanker) be replaced every 15
years. Oro-Medonte reviews apparatus replacement every 20 - 25 years
depending on condition and repair costs.
Based on this 20 - 25 year life span and monitored on an annual basis the
following evaluations have been made regarding replacement of apparatus and
equipment.
. Pumper - due for replacement 2019
. Tanker- has been refurbished and is due for replacement 2010
. Equipment e.g. hose, breathing apparatus etc is sufficient
. Rescue Van 1 or 2 or both respond to Station 5 incidents dependant on
location and nature (with equipment e.g. jaws of life, positive pressure
ventilation fans etc)
. The old Rescue Van 3 is also housed at this station as is currently being used
as a Volunteer Firefighters' support vehicle on the scene.
The apparatus is in good working order and there is no need for additions based
on potential risk, projected growth or breakdown. Replacement time frames
provide sufficient time under the capital expenditure policy/procedure that is
currently in place.
Equipment is assessed for wear on an on-going basis and replaced as required
to meet applicable standards, needs and circumstances.
Associated Potential Risks - Warminster Fire Station
Station Location
- those areas along the Highway 12 and Horseshoe Valley Road corridors are at
less risk than the properties in the western and Bass Lake shoreline portions of
the response area (due to travel distance).
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 9
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 5 Warminster - DRAFT April 3/03
Fire Station - Warminster Con't ....
Call Volume Analysis and Incident Location
- although there is a high volume of incidents along Highway 12 corridor, the
station is well located to respond to these calls.
- incidents along the Bass lake shoreline and the western portion of the response
area present some potential risk due to the travel distance and roadway
accessibility
Station Personnel
- response numbers are good, but ongoing monitoring should be carried out and
a minimum compliment of 16 firefighters should be maintained to ensure an
average of 6-7 on scene.
Facility
- the lack of emergency power, office space, or additional space for apparatus
does not present a potential risk at this time
Apparatus and Equipment
- based on the replacement criteria (standards, needs, circumstances and the
corporate procedures) there is no potential risk with regard to apparatus and
equipment at this time.
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 10
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 5 Warminster - DRAFT April 3/03
Water
Water sources for the purpose of fire protection are identified as being used year
round e.g. hydrants** and holding tanks. All other sources are considered static
that mayor may not be easily accessible year round e.g. frozen over or not easy
to locate due to snow cover. Private sources were not included in the mapping
process but some are mentioned in this analysis.
**Hydrants are considered in two categories, credited and non-credited.
. Credited - meets fire flow requirements of minimum 400 gallons per minute
. Non-credited - all others that don't meet the requirement
In addition to these water sources the tankers and pumpers can transport water
quickly to the fire scene and be used until other sources are identified. Mutual
aid can also be accessed if required to supply water.
Locations
Hydrants
. Non-credited hydrants in the Village of Warminster
. Have permission to use City of Orillia boarder hydrants
Static Water Sources
Pumper Access
At Horseshoe Valley Rd (Pritchard Subdivision) and the Townline (Marchmont)
· Lines 11 & 12 north (Barton Spence & Allen Bell ponds)
. Holding tank at Notre Dame School
Portable Pump Accessible (good sources)
· Around the perimeter of the station area (several ponds and creeks)
Availability of sources to high risk areas
Readily available to:
Some areas of the railway, some agriculture, mobile home park, and garden
center
Not readily available to:
Some agriculture and some parts of the railway
Due to the lack of water around Lines 10, 11 & 12 (core of station area) and the
Warminster Side Road, It could be more difficult to contain lfight fires on some
agricultural properties.
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 11
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 5 Warminster - DRAFT April 3/03
Roads
Fire and Emergency Services need to be able to access all areas of the township
in order to meet the level of service expected and required of them.
Provincial Roads
Highway 12
. Good condition and good accessibility
County Roads
Horseshoe Valley Road
. good condition and good accessibility in this area
Municipal Roads
. Generally in good condition with good accessibility, however roads around the
Bass Lake shoreline can become congested with parked cars and hills on
some side roads could cause delayed response
Trail System
None
There is no potential risk at this time.
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 12
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 5 Warminster - DRAFT April 3/03
Communications
Two way radio communication is available through emergency vehicles and
officers at all times.
Volunteer Fire Fighters rely on pagers only (one way communication) until roll out
in the emergency vehicles.
Concerns:
There are some difficulties with pager and portable radio response due in part to
the effects of reception pockets. Spectrum Management, under Industry Canada,
has set a deadline of 2004 for the re-alignment of band width, which will correct
this problem.
In some areas of the township there are still 4 party party-lines which means that
residents must call directly to the Barrie Fire Control Dispatch Center instead of
using the enhanced 9-1-1 system. If the resident dials 9-1-1 they may reach
another dispatch center other than Barrie because of the trunk line system. This
means delays in response while the correct fire department is identified and then
notified. There is currently no information available regarding if or when Bell
Canada will correct this situation.
Only the 9-1-1 vs. call direct issue could pose a potential risk.
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 13
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 5 Warminster - DRAFT April 3/03
Tourism
Given that the township is promoting tourism and recreation through its'
brochures, due consideration should be given to the impact any increased
activity will have on the fire and Emergency Services Department.
In addition to the Parks and Recreation Master Plan (completed 1997) the
Township has completed a Parkland Secondary Study that will be beneficial in
providing further details regarding future direction in tourism/recreation.
OutJined below are the activities that currently take place in the Warminster
response area that can result in increased risk for the township with regard to
response times etc. for medical and public assistance calls including cold water /
ice rescue and remote search and rescue.
· Camping and trails - year round (Blackberry Hills)
· Additional use of highway 12, and county roads as tourists pass through or
stay in the area
There is some reason for concern regarding the number of incidents along
Highway 12 and county roads, however further monitoring is required to
determine the effects of tourism related activities on these figures.
DRAFT UPDATE ...... April 3, 2003
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 14
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 5 Warminster - DRAFT April 3/03
0<
".
Fire and Emergency Services Deparlment
Master Plan
Risk Analysis By Station
Station # 6 Moonstone
Area of coverage 13,599 Hectares
Community (see building stock breakdown on page 14, section C of background)
Exposure to potential risk -
Listed below are the buildings and properties that expose the community to a
potentially higher level of risk than normal and could result in death or environmental
damage. The level of risk for incident is related to building/property content or the
unknown factors (e.g. vehicles using highway 400). Emergency response to these
incidents could include Fire, Medical Assist, Hazmat and / or Rescue.
. Highway 400
. Ski Resorts
. Agriculture (chemical storage and use)
. Lumberyard
. Project Turnaround
. Railway
. Moonstone Road and Vasey Road
. Simcoe County Forest (Copeland)
. Municipal & County Roads Buildings
Economic Impact
Listed below are those buildings or properties that expose the community to a
potentially higher level of risk and could result in loss of jobs, loss of revenue,
loss of property or loss of tax base. The potential risk is related to
building/property content or the unknown factors (e.g. vehicles using highway
400).
. Railway
. Project Turnaround
. Ski Resorts
· Municipal and County Roads Buildings
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 1
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 6 Moonstone -DRAFT April 3/03
Growth and Population (Community Profile pages 34 - 36)
Based on the Official Plan (1997) the Township of Oro-Medonte is expected to
increase in population by a projected 10,181 over a 20 year period or by 2016. In
1996 the population was 16,698 (Census Canada) and has now increased to
18,315 (2001 Census) or by 9%.
There is no accurate formula (at present) to determine the population by
response area, however statistics have given us some age group data to
consider. Approximately 25% of the total population (18,315) are over 55 years of
age, 32% are under 25, and the remaining 43% are between 25 and 54.
Age Group 2001
o - 4 years = 5.2%
5 - 14 years = 14.5%
15 -19 years = 7.3%
20 - 24 years = 4.9 %
25 - 44 years = 27.0 %
45 - 54 years = 16.5 %
55 - 64 years = 11.6 %
65 - 74 years = 7.8 %
75 - 84 years = 5.2%
Age Group 2016
15 - 19 years
20 - 29 years
30 - 34 years
35 - 39 years
40 - 59 years
60 - 69 years
70 - 79 years
80 - 89 years
90 - 99 years
From a risk management perspective the seniors (over 55) and the young people
(under 25) can benefit from strong Fire Prevention and Public Education
programs which would reduce incidents in the future. The current number of
medical assist calls (which will escalate with the tiered response program) is due
in part to the large seniors population and affects some stations more than
others. This type of call will potentially increase as the 45 to 54 group ages.
According to the Community Profile, building permits across the township are in
line with past averages from 1980 to 1996 of 136 per year. From 1997 to 2001
there have been an average of 129 residential building permits, 5 commercial
permits, 1 industrial permit, 35 multi-dwelling permits per year.
Moonstone Highlights
This area has approximately 105 approved residential lots (some of which are
under construction) and some renovations to existing commercial properties.
The current number of approved lots does not pose a risk.
The information highlighted and analyzed above could change dependant upon
the outcome of the Official Plan review in 2003.
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 2
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 6 Moonstone -DRAFT April 3/03
Emergency Response - Host Station - Moonstone
This is the time frame from a call being received by dispatch through to the
arrival of the first host station emergency vehicle and personnel on the scene of
the incident. This process involves the following:
Dispatch
. call received by dispatch
. dispatch tones out
Assemblv and Roll-Out
. assembly at station
. leaving the station and confirming vehicle response (some firefighters will go
directly to the incident in their own vehicle)
Travel
. travel time to scene
. arrival on scene
. notify dispatch that host station is on the scene
The working committee established the following time lines as being
acceptable:
Dispatch - call received to tones complete 1 % minutes (as per NFPA Standard 12-21)
Assembly and Roll-Out - assemble at station and confirm vehicle responding is 5 minutes
Travel I Arrival on Scene - due to the geographic nature, of the township,
seasonal weather conditions and the proximity of an incident to the location of
the station, a standard timeframe cannot be applied
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 3
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 6 Moonstone -DRAFT April 3/03
Emergency Response Con't ....
The following charts show the average emergency response times for all
Moonstone calls (1997-2001) including property fires, pre-fire conditions, public
hazards, rescue / extrication and medical/ resuscitator calls, as outlined in
categories in Section D (pages 3 - 5)
Average Emergency Response Times, 1997-2001
Total Day Night Weekday Weekend
Number of Calls 148 91 57 83 65
Avg. Dispatch Time 2:54 2:52 2:56 3:09 2:34
Avg. Roll-Out Time 3:10 3:35 2:32 3:30 2:45
(% under 5 minutes) 88% 84% 95% 83% 94%
AVQ. Travel Time 6:56 6:25 7:46 6:34 7:24
Avg. Total Response 13:00 12:51 13:14 13:13 12:43
Time
Tones Complete Until on Scene (under 10 minutes, between 10-15 minutes,
over 15 minutes), 1997-2001
Average Day Night Weekday Weekend
Under 10 Minutes 67% 65% 70% 61% 74%
10 & 15 Minutes 23% 25% 19% 28% 17%
Over 15 Minutes 10% 10% 11% 11% 9%
All Stations Summary
Total Day Night Weekday Weekend
Number of Calls 1115 624 491 678 437
Avg. Dispatch Time 3:01 3:06 2:54 2:57 3:10
Roll-Out Time 2:58 3:05 2:49 3:05 2:52
(% under 5 minutes) 88% 86% 90% 85% 92%
Avg. Travel Time 5:57 5:50 6:08 5:48 6:11
Avg. Total Response 11:57 12:01 11:51 11:50 12:12
Time
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 4
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 6 Moonstone -DRAFT April 3/03
Emergency Response Con't ....
Associated Risks - Emergency Response Times
- Includes all 1115 calls (1997 - 2001), property fires, pre-fire conditions, public
hazards, rescue / extrication and medical I resuscitator calls.
Moonstone
Percentage of Total Calls:
13.5 % or 148 calls
Dispatch Times (avQ. 2:54):
- all times over the acceptable 90 seconds, but only nights and weekdays are
higher than the all station average of 3:01 (but within 10-15 seconds)
Roll Out Times CavQ. 3:10):
- nights and weekends are lower but days and weekends are higher than the
all station average of 2:58 by up to 30 seconds
Travel Times (avg. 6:56):
- all times are higher than the all station average of 5:57
Total Response Times (avg. 13:00):
- all times are higher than the all station average of 11 :57
Tones Complete Until On Scene:
Personnel and Apparatus on the scene within 10 minutes in an average of
67% of all calls
The elevated travel and total response times are reason for concern, however,
on scene under 10 minutes at 67% is in line with most other stations.
Ongoing monitoring should be carried out to review travel times which are higher
than all station average. For additional information regarding travel times see
Call Volume Analysis & Proximity to Incident Data on pages 6-7.
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 5
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 6 Moonstone -DRAFT April 3/03
Fire Station - Moonstone
The following data refers to:
- the location of station with respect to the incidents it responds to
- analysis of incidents by volume and locations
- station personnel- volunteer firefighters
- facilities, apparatus and equipment
Location
Close to:
. Highway 400
. Ski resorts
. Railway
. Moonstone Road
· Project Turnaround
. Majority of the volunteer firefighters
Not close to:
. Lumberyard
. Vasey Road
· Some agriculture (particularly on the west side of the area)
Note****
A special agreement is in place with Springwater Township to
respond more efficiently to the western part of the area to
accommodate the needs of residents with regard to allowable
travel distances for insurance purposes.
Call Volume Analysis
Year Highway 400 Medonte Heights SID Robin Crest SID
1997 7 1 5
1998 5 2 2
1999 5 1 2
2000 9 3 1
2001 4 1 4
1997-2001 30 8 14
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 6
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 6 Moonstone -DRAFT April 3/03
Fire Station - Moonstone Con't ......
Location of Incidents
- Highway 400, Medonte Heights subdivision and Robin Crest subdivision
account for 35% or 52 calls of the 148 calls (1997-2001). The remaining 65%
or 95 calls are spread throughout the response area. (not including area
covered by Springwater Township Fire Department)
Proximity of Station to Incident and Accessibility
Incidents along Highway 400 are easily accessible, however winter conditions
can limit the ability to use center turn around and shoulders
Incidents in the Village of Moonstone and the subdivisions are easily
accessible
- Incidents along Lines 4 - 9 are more difficult to respond to due to the
numerous steep hills
- Incidents along Line 2 and Scarlett Line (from Vasey Road to Highway 400
and Ingram Road from Penetanguishene Road to Line 4) are responded to
through an agreement with Springwater Township Fire Department.
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 7
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 6 Moonstone -DRAFT April 3/03
Fire Station - Moonstone Con't ......
Station Personnel - Volunteer Fire Fighters
Full personnel compliment is 16 volunteer firefighters per station. Through the
recruitment process, measures are taken to maintain full compliment (see page 5,
Section A, of Background). The chart below showing the average number of
firefighters on scene is based on all incidents including property fires, pre-fire
conditions, public hazards, rescue! extrication and medical! resuscitator calls, as
outlined in categories in Section D (pages 3 - 5).
Station #6 - Host Station (host station firefighters only)
Year # F.F.'s Avg. Day Night Week-Day Weekend
1997 16 6 5 8 5 7
1998 15 6 5 7 5 8
1999 13 5 5 7 5 7
2000 16 7 6 8 6 8
2001 14 7 6 8 7 7
1997-2001 6 5 8 6 7
6 of 16 firefighters mayor may not be an acceptable level of response based on
all calls (as outlined above) due to the nature of the calls as follows:
· a structure fire is automatically a multi station response ( minimum of a 2
station response)
· a burning complaint call can usually be handled by 1 or 2 personnel
· all other calls (carbon monoxide, rescue! medical etc.) are responded to by at
least 1 apparatus carrying 1 personnel
Day and weekday response is slightly lower than nights and weekends, however
considering yearly compliment fluctuations, their personnel on scene numbers
are good.
The number of firefighters on scene are assessed and adjusted by Incident
Command personnel to ensure sufficient firefighters are present as the incident
dictates. Additionally, this information is tracked and monitored on a continuous
basis to provide insight into staffing availability and needs.
Additional information regarding staffing implications will be covered in general
by a portion of this risk analysis addressing staffing issues relative to the whole
department.
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 8
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 6 Moonstone -DRAFT April 3/03
Fire Station - Moonstone Con't ......
Facility, Apparatus and Equipment
Facility
. No room for expansion
. No room for additional apparatus
· Has limited parking and therefore is crowded in an emergency
. Does not have proper training facilities
. Office space is not within the main facility
. No emergency power
Apparatus and Equipment
(see section B of the background materials)
OFM recommends front line apparatus (pumper, tanker) be replaced every 15
years. Oro-Medonte reviews apparatus replacement every 20 - 25 years
depending on condition and repair costs.
Based on this 20 - 25 year life span and monitored on an annual basis the
following evaluations have been made regarding replacement of apparatus and
equipment.
· Pumper - body work was done in 1997due for replacement 2011
. Tanker -due for replacement 2002
· Equipment e.g. hose, breathing apparatus etc is sufficient
· Rescue Van 2 is housed at this station and responds to the areas not covered
by Rescue 1. As well it is available to assist Rescue 1 (with equipment e.g.
jaws of life, positive pressure ventilation fans etc) and is due for replacement
2021. The life span of this Rescue Van should be reviewed with
consideration given to the workload it continues to get.
The apparatus is in good working order and there is no need for additions based
on potential risk, projected growth or breakdown. Replacement time frames
provide sufficient time under the capital expenditure policy/procedure that is
currently in place.
Equipment is assessed for wear on an on-going basis and replaced as required
to meet applicable standards, needs and circumstances.
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 9
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 6 Moonstone -DRAFT April 3/03
Fire Station - Moonstone Con't ......
Associated Potential Risks - Moonstone Fire Station
Station Location
Due to the agreement with Springwater Township Fire Department the travel
distance from station 6 has been reduced, therefore reducing the level of potential risk to
the most westerly portions of the response area (Scarlett Line to Line 2). This
arrangement does, however, require the Township to pay $1,000 per call (minimum) for
the service.
The village of Moonstone, subdivisions surrounding the village and some
parts of Highway 400 are at less risk than the rest of the response area that are
affected by travel time and the terrain
Call Volume Analysis and Incident Location
Properties in the village and subdivisions (Medonte Heights, Robin Crest and Bachly)
are at less risk than the rest of the response area due to travel distance and the hilly
terrain
Station Personnel
Response numbers are good, but ongoing monitoring should be carried out and
a minimum compliment of 16 firefighters should be maintained to ensure an average of 6-
7 on scene.
Facility
The lack of room for additional apparatus (the rescue van is now parked where
the training room was) causes difficulty mobilizing vehicles which could cause time delays
and is further complicated by no room for expansion
The lack of sufficient parking makes it difficult to maneuver apparatus and volunteer
firefighters vehicles and could present a risk due to time delays
The lack of emergency power, training facilities and office space is not critical
but makes the facility as a whole inadequate and inefficient.
Apparatus and Equipment
based on the replacement criteria (standards, needs, circumstances and the
corporate procedures) there is no potential risk with regard to apparatus and equipment
at this time.
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 10
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 6 Moonstone -DRAFT April 3/03
Water
Water sources for the purpose of fire protection are identified as being used year
round e.g. hydrants.. and holding tanks. All other sources are considered static
that mayor may not be easily accessible year round e.g. frozen over or not easy
to locate due to snow cover. Private sources were not included in the mapping
process but some are mentioned in this analysis.
**Hydrants are considered in two categories, credited and non-credited.
· Credited - meets fire flow requirements of minimum 400 gallons per minute
· Non-credited - all others that don't meet the requirement
In addition to these water sources the tankers and pumpers can transport water
quickly to the fire scene and be used until other sources are identified. Mutual
aid can also be accessed if required to supply water.
Locations
Hydrants
· Non-credited hydrants in the Village of Moonstone, Bachly Subdivision and on
Snowshoe Trail
Static Water Sources
Pumper Accessible
· West side of Scarlett Line between Mount St Louis Road & Moonstone Road
· Peter Street between Lines 2 & 3
· Lines 4 & 5 between Peter Street and Moonstone Road
· Lines 5,6,8 & 9 below Highway 400
· Moonstone Road east of Highway 400 (Eady Church)
Portable Pump Accessible (good sources)
· Moonstone Road at Lines 3 (Project Turnaround), 1 0 & 11
· Vasey Road at Lines 2 & 8
. Ingram Rd at Line 6
· Mount St Louis Rd at Lines 7 (Mt St Louis Rd) & 9
· Line 5 between Vasey Road and Peter St
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 11
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 6 Moonstone -DRAFT April 3/03
Water continued....
Availability of sources to high risk areas
Readily available to:
· Project Turnaround, Railway, Municipal and County Roads Building
Not readily available to:
· Most agriculture, Mount St Louis Resort (Resort has pumping facilities for
snowmaking that is not currently available to Fire and Emergency Services)
. Lumberyard
Due to the lack water above the village and Highway 400 (through the center of
the area) there is a potential risk to residential and agricultural properties as well
as Highway 400.
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 12
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 6 Moonstone -DRAFT April 3/03
Roads
Fire and Emergency Services need to be able to access all areas of the township
in order to meet the level of services expected and required of them.
Provincial Roads
Highway 400
· Access to highway is only available at lines 7 & 9 and at Penetanguishene
Road
Moonstone Road
· Good condition and good access
Vasey Road
· Good condition and good access
Municipal Roads
· Generally in good condition, however there are some areas that are
extremely hilly and some roads that are a dead-end, which could contribute to
increased response times
· There is no access to Blueberry Marsh Road from Moonstone Road, which
could increase response time.
Trail System
· Un-official trails through Copeland Forest - not easily accessible
There is some potential risk due to the difficulty in accessing some properties
where the roads are dead-ends, or the terrain is hilly.
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 13
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 6 Moonstone -DRAFT April 3/03
Communications
Two-way radio communication is available through emergency vehicles and all
officers.
Volunteer Fire Fighters rely on pagers only (one way communication) until roll out
in the emergency vehicles.
Concerns:
There are some difficulties with pager and portable radio response due in part to
the effects of reception pockets. Spectrum Management, under Industry Canada,
has set a deadline of 2004 for the re-alignment of band width, which will correct
this problem.
In some areas of the township there are still 4 party party-lines which means that
residents must call directly to the Barrie Fire Control Dispatch Center instead of
using the enhanced 9-1-1 system. If the resident dials 9-1-1 they may reach
another dispatch center other than Barrie because of the trunk line system. This
means delays in response while the correct fire department is identified and then
notified. There is currently no information available regarding if or when Bell
Canada will correct this situation.
Only the 9-1-1 vs. call direct issue could pose a potential risk.
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 14
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 6 Moonstone -DRAFT April 3/03
Tourism
Given that the township is promoting tourism and recreation through its'
brochures, due consideration should be given to the impact any increased
activity will have on the fire and Emergency Services Department.
In addition to the Parks and Recreation Master Plan (completed 1997) the
Township has completed a Parkland Secondary Study that will be beneficial in
providing further details regarding future direction in tourism/recreation.
Outlined below are the activities that currently take place in the Moonstone
response area that can result in increased risk for the township with regarding to
response times etc. for medical and public assistance calls including cold
waterlice rescue and remote search and rescue.
. Unofficial trails - year round (Copeland Forests)
. Downhill and cross country skiing
. Highway 400 traffic moving north and south or coming to this area
Further monitoring is required to determine the effects of tourism related activities
on the number of incidents in the station 6 response area
DRAFT UPDATE ........ April 3, 2003
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master 15
Risk Analysis By Station - Station # 6 Moonstone -DRAFT April 3/03
If
..
Fire Prevention and Public Education Summary
Observations
Fire Prevention and Public Education is managed on a department wide basis.
Currently, the Chief and Deputy Chief oversee all components of this area but are
reactive rather than proactive in their approach. From a "risk management" perspective,
Fire Prevention and Public Education can provide methods by which the department can
lower the elements of risk for the municipality, but the programs should be proactive in
nature with regard to:
· preventing fires through public education
· regular and timely inspections.
The Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department's E&R Bylaw does not
include a Fire Prevention and Public Education Policy, but it does meet the minimum
requirements of Guideline 04-40-12 which states that the following components must be
delivered in one form or another. The components are:
· Smoke alarm program
· Distribution of educational materials
· Inspection program
· Perform a simplified risk analysis
The smoke alarm program, the distribution of educational materials and the inspection
program are handled in a reactive manner due to the time and manpower required for
more proactive programs. The simplified risk analysis has been carried out in a
proactive manner (through this exercise) and will be monitored and maintained.
Smoke Alarm Program:
The Fire and Emergencies Services Department has a Standard Operating Guideline
(SOG) # 022 which in turn complies with the Fire Code 388/97. The SOG states "When
on location of any type of emergency to a dwelling unit the smoke detector in that
dwelling unit shall be located and tested for operation before clearing the scene. The
smoke alarm maintenance checklist shall also be completed."
Distribution of Educational Materials:
Year round requests are made of the Chief, Deputy Chief and Volunteer Fire Fighters to
make presentations to the public using the wide range of materials, video tapes and
workshops that are available upon request. Currently, the only program that is offered
annually is the Fire Safety House, which is sponsored by the Kiwanis.
The trained volunteer fire fighters that deliver the Fire Safety House Program to the
schools in the Township do so in their spare time and on days off from their full time
employment. Unfortunately, it has become much more difficult to deliver this program
due to lack of staffing, and in recent years some cancellations have resulted.
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 1
Fire Prevention and Public Education Analysis - DRAFT APRIL 3.03
The focus of a good Fire Prevention and Public Education program should be to help the
community learn how to prevent incidents through identifying hazards and modifying
behaviours. There are many programs that could be promoted to the schools as well as
the retirement communities e.g. Learn Not To Burn and Risk Watch, but current time and
manpower constraints do not allow for such a commitment A Fire Prevention and
Public Education Officer can ensure that such programs are accessible to all age
groups.
The 10 in 10 Guideline is currently being reviewed by OFM to establish standards for
both urban and rural application. Preliminary modifications to this guideline indicate that
a large rural community (such as Oro-Medonte) that cannot attain a standard of 10
firefighters in 10 minutes for a single family dwelling structure fire 90% of the time, could
offset this inefficiency by developing a strong pro-active Fire Prevention and Public
Education program.
Historical data (1997-2001) does not confirm whether or not there were always10 host
firefighters on the scene within the 10 minutes, however a structure fire (single family
dwelling or otherwise) is at minimum a 2 response. Additionally, there were an average
of 6 personnel on scene for all calls including property fires, pre-fire conditions, public
hazards, rescue/extrication and medical/resuscitator etc, which could mean 2 at one call
and 30 at another. This indicates that there were at least 10 fire fighters on the scene,
and with the average response time of 11 minutes 57 seconds, the optimum time frame
would have been met The excellent tracking systems that are now in place, provide
detailed reports regarding response times and numbers on scene, and will allow the
department to highlight the areas of the Township that will require additional Fire
Prevention and Public Education programs.
A well rounded Fire Prevention and Public Education Policy is needed to address all of
the necessary components but will require an additional staff member to co-ordinate,
manage and deliver the program. Based on the size and geographic nature of the
municipality, and the fact that the department is based on volunteer manpower, such a
policy and program should be seen as an important part of the support structure for the
organization.
Inspections:
To prevent an incident, it is important to know where the potential problems are.
Through this risk analysis exercise, the department has identified the properties and
facilities that pose a potential risk, but it does not have a program in place to determine
the extent of the problem. For example, they know where the industrial and commercial
facilities are within the Township, but only have limited information regarding the
contents of many of these buildings and properties. A proactive inspection program
would allow for comprehensive detailing of risk factors (e.g. chemical storage or building
structure problems) and provide opportunities to work with the occupants to prevent or
pre-plan in case of an incident Again, such a program promotes the concept of
preventing fires vs putting out fires. This kind of program should then grow to include
residential inspections that are now done on a request or complaint basis, and this in
turn would enhance the public education component
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 2
Fire Prevention and Public Education Analysis - DRAFT APRIL 3.03
.,.
~
~
..
Conclusion
The elements of risk involved in the Fire Prevention and Public Education components
are based on the lack of proactive programs and the lack of manpower to develop and
promote them. By creating a position for a Fire Prevention and Public Education Officer,
it would enable the department to focus on the prevention of incidents versus the
reactive approach they now have. It would also allow for more inspections of all facilities
and properties within the township, which in turn would provide further insight for
proactive prevention programs and pre-incident planning strategies.
DRAFT UPDATED .......... APRIL 3, 2003
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan 3
Fire Prevention and Public Education Analysis - DRAFT APRIL 3.03
.;t,
~.
,.
Staffing Summary
The staffing component of the risk analysis provides in-depth information regarding the requirements
and the deficiencies related to availability and numbers on scene, There is no standard for numbers
on scene, however, the OFM is currently reviewing the 10 in 10 Guideline which promotes 10 fire
fighters within 10 minutes for a single family dwelling structure fire. Through the OFM review there will
be a determination of the applicable standards for both urban and rural Fire and Emergency Services
Departments.
The following chart outlines staffing statistics with regard to station compliment, number of calls and
response time data,
The call data includes all incidents (property fires, pre-fire conditions, public hazards, rescue I extrication
and medical I resuscitator calls) for years 1997-2001.
Station Avg. Number Avg. Avg. Avg. Avg. Avg. Avg.
Compliment of Calls Number Dispatch Roll Travel Total Response
on Time Out Time Response Under
Scene 10 Minutes
Station 1 16 263 6 2:49 2:40 6:31 12:00 63%
Station 2 16 252 6 2:53 2:16 5:49 10:58 78%
Station 3 16 216 4 2:47 4:06 5:04 11:58 64%
Station 4 14 88 6 3:34 2:13 5:23 11:10 83%
Station 5 14 148 6 3:09 3:24 6:01 12:34 64%
Station 6 15 148 6 2:54 3:10 6:56 13:00 67%
All 16 1115 6 3:01 2:58 5:57 11:57 69%
Stations
Outlined below are the station highlights with regard to call volume, response times and numbers on scene.
The following facts should be taken into consideration:
1. call volume is shown in total and by busiest time e.g. daytime, nighttime, weekday or weekend
2. response time reflects dispatch to on scene time frame
3. dispatch is handled by an outside agency (Barrie Fire Control) and beyond service negotiations
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services does not manage the efficiencies of this portion of the
response time
4. roll out times are influenced by the availability of volunteer firefighters
5. travel times vary depending on the location of the incident in proximity to the station, weather and
terrain
Shanty Bay Highlights
173 of 263 calls on week-days
avg. weekday response time 12:00
avg. weekday dispatch time 2:41
avg. weekday roll out time 2:53
avg. weekday travel time 6:25
64% of calls under 10 minutes on weekdays
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan
Staffing Analysis Summary - DRAFT - April 3.03
"
..
Shanty Bav Highlights Con't ....
response area includes:
. high density waterfront and village
. heavily traveled roads (eg. Highway 11, Ridge Road, Lakeshore Road and Penetanguishene Road)
average of 6 volunteer firefighters on scene on weekdays
. volunteer firefighters availability good with regard to proximity to station and work/shift commitments
Based on these statistics, there is a relatively low level of risk to the Shanty Bay response area,
however it is important that a minimum of 16 volunteer firefighters remain on staff to ensure
there are an average of 6 or more on scene.
Hawkestone Highlights
146 of 252 calls on week-days
avg. weekday response time 10:42
avg. weekday dispatch time 2:43
avg. weekday roll out time 2:25
avg. weekday travel time 5:35
77% of calls under 10 minutes on weekdays
response area includes:
. high density waterfront and village
. heavily traveled roads (eg. Highway 11, Ridge Road, Lakeshore Road)
. large industrial park
average of 6 volunteer firefighters on scene on weekdays
· volunteer firefighters availability good with regard to proximity to station and work/shift commitments
Based on these statistics, there is a relatively low level of risk to the Hawkestone response area,
however it is important that a minimum of 16 volunteer firefighters remain on staff to ensure
there are an average of 6 or more on scene.
Horseshoe Vallev Highlights
124 of 216 calls on week-days
avg. weekday response time 11 :35
avg. weekday dispatch time 2:41
avg. weekday roll out time 4:04
avg. weekday travel time 4:50
65% of calls under 10 minutes on weekdays
response area includes:
. high density subdivisions
. heavily traveled roads (eg. Horseshoe Valley Road and Penetanguishene Road)
. year round resorts
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan
Staffing Analysis Summary - DRAFT - April 3.03
2
Horseshoe Valley Highlights Can't ....
average of 4 volunteer firefighters on scene on weekdays
. volunteer firefighters availability is not good with regard to proximity to station and work/shift
commitments
Although the Chief and Deputy Chief responses are not recorded (only volunteer firefighters),
these statistics indicate that there is reason for concern with regard to potential risk due to the
low average numbers on scene and the higher than average roll out times.
This is due in part to the lack of availability of volunteer firefighters in the station area (eg.
lifestyle, age and work I shift commitments) and the distance the firefighters have to travel to the
station.
It is necessary to maintain a minimum of 16 volunteer firefighters to ensure 6 or more on scene.
Additional personnel may be required to ensure adequate numbers are responding and on
scene.
Rugby Highlights
64 of 88 calls on week-days
avg. weekday response time 10:37
avg. weekday dispatch time 3:20
avg. weekday roll out time 1 :59
avg. weekday travel time 5: 18
86% of calls under 10 minutes on weekdays
response area includes:
. 2 high density mobile park complexes and waterfront (Bass Lake)
. heavily traveled roads (eg. Old Barrie Road)
average of 6 volunteer firefighters on scene on weekdays
. volunteer firefighters availability good with regard to proximity to station and work/shift commitments
Based on these statistics, there is a relatively low level of risk to the Rugby response area,
however it is important that a minimum of 16 volunteer firefighters remain on staff to ensure
there are an average of 6 or more on scene.
Warminster Highlights
88 of 148 calls on week-days
avg. weekday response time 12:52
avg. weekday dispatch time 3:08
avg. weekday roll out time 3:38
avg. weekday travel time 6:06
60% of calls under 10 minutes on weekdays
response area includes:
. high density subdivisions and waterfront (Bass Lake)
. heavily traveled roads (eg. Highway 12 and Horseshoe Valley Road)
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan
Staffing Analysis Summary - DRAFT - April 3.03
3
Warminster Highliahts Con't .....
average of 6 volunteer firefighters on scene on weekdays
· volunteer firefighters availability has improved and remains good with regard to proximity to station
and work/shift commitments
Based on these statistics, there is some reason for concem with regard to potential risk due to elevated
dispatch and roll out times. Dispatch times should be monitored for efficiencies and work I shift
commitments should be monitored with regard to extended roll out times. Average numbers on scene are
good, but it is important to maintain a full compliment of 16 firefighters to ensure 6 or more are arriving on
scene.
Moonstone Highlights
83 of 148 calls on week-days
avg. weekday response time 13:13
avg. weekday dispatch time 3:09
avg. weekday roll out time 3:30
avg. weekday travel time 6:34
61% of calls under 10 minutes on weekdays
response area includes:
. high density village and subdivisions
· heavily traveled roads (eg. Highway 400 and Vasey Road)
average of 6 volunteer firefighters on scene on weekdays
· volunteer firefighters availability good with regard to proximity to station and work/shift commitments
Based on these statistics, there is some reason for concem with regard to potential risk due to elevated
dispatch and roll out times. Dispatch times should be monitored for efficiencies and work I shift
commitments should be monitored with regard to extended roll out times, Average numbers on scene are
good, but it is important to maintain a full compliment of 16 firefighters to ensure 6 or more are arriving on
scene.
Observations
Compliment vs Numbers on Scene:
The element of risk with regard to staffing is two fold. There must be enough staff available
(both in the station compliment and on the scene) to ensure constructive impact at the scene of
the incident and to ensure safe execution of duties. Historically the station compliment has
been 16 fire fighters, and the chart on page one of this document shows that the average
number (for all incidents) on scene is 6. This would indicate that in order to maintain that level
of response, there must be a minimum of 16 VFF's on roster at all times. The exception to this
is Horseshoe Valley Station where the average number on scene is only 4. These numbers do
not include a response by the Chief or Deputy Chief who are not always available due to other
responsibilities. If their assistance is required in any of the response areas they will respond (if
available) but the information is not shown in the host station statistical data.
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master Plan
Staffing Analysis Summary - DRAFT - April 3.03
4
.
Observations Con't ...
The fact that Horseshoe Valley Station has difficulty getting more than an average of 4 VFF on
scene indicates that the recruitment process for the station (and indeed for the whole
department) needs to be reviewed. Historically, the fire fighters for this station do not live close
by and therefore have considerable distance to travel before roll out. The chart information
confirms this with an average roll out time of 4 minutes 6 seconds. The lower personnel
compliments at Rugby, Warminster and Moonstone further highlights the need to have an
effective recruitment program that will attract the right candidates.
Training:
As highlighted throughout various portions of the analysis, there is a need for overall
coordination and management of the training requirements for the department Although most
training programs and facilitation components are in place, these responsibilities are handled by
Volunteer Firefighters and it is becoming increasingly more difficult to fill the need. The
department requires a full time Training and Development Officer to assist the Chief and Deputy
Chief in the areas of compilation of training records, program coordination, development and
delivery etc. as outlined in the E & R bylaw. Throughout the data collection process for this
document, there was a significant amount of work done to organize and record the training
information so that tracking systems could be designed. The department however, does not
have a full time Training and Development professional that can commit the time and expertise
required to maintain and enhance the program.
The risk analysis has also highlighted some potential areas where training programs could be
developed or enhanced to meet the changing needs of the department For example, with the
increasing numbers of medical assist calls, due in part to the Tiered Response Program, there
is a need to monitor training needs for the department to ensure service goals and requirements
are being met. A training professional would provide valuable support to the Chief and Deputy
Chief in this area.
Conclusions
Staffing Requirements:
An overall review of human resource requirements should be carried out once the corporation
has established a level of service for the Fire and Emergency Services Department.
DRAFT UPDATED ........ APRIL 3, 2003
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Services Department - Master
Staffing Analysis Summary - DRAFT - April 3.03
5
.,.
",,",
Township of Oro-Medonte
Fire and Emergency Master Plan
Analysis of Needs - Chart
April 3, 2003 - DRAFT
Listed below are the abbreviations for the terms used in this chart.
VFF = Volunteer Fire Fighter
Min. G/Lines = Guidelines set out by Ministry of Public Safety & Security
Min. of Lab. = Ministry of Labour Legislation
OH&SA= Occupational Health and Safety Act
OFSS = Ontario Fire Services Standards
Section 21 = Health and Safety Guidelines for Ontario Fire Services Section 21 Advisory Committee (36 G/Lines Fire
Service Specific)
FPPA = Fire Protection and Prevention Act received Royal Assent and became law in 1997 in the Province of Ontario
Fire works Explosion Act = Federal Energy Mines and Resources
POA = Provincial Offences Act 1990
HTA = Highway Traffic Act
ULC = Underwriters Laboratories of Canada
E&R Bylaw = Establishing and Regulating Bylaw (Municipal)
SOG = Standard Operating Guideline
MOT = Ministry of Transport
NFPA = National Fire Protection Association
WSIA = Workplace Safety and Insurance Act
OFM = Office of The Fire Marshal
OESC = Ontario Electrical Safety Code
TSSA = Technical Standards and Safety Authority
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Master Plan - Analysis - DRAFT April 3, 2003
1
Administration (Section A of Background Materials)
Recruitment Practices
· Min. G/Line
04-61-12 and up to
the municipality
Hiring Practices
· Min. G/Lines
04-61-12 and
04-84-13
· E&R Bylaw
Section 4
Retention
· Min. G/Lines
04-61-12 and
04-84-13
· There are waiting
lists for some
stations, but
potential recruits
are lacking for
station 4
· Meet guidelines, is
consistent with
most volunteer fire
departments
across Ontario.
· Meets minimum
municipal hiring
practices
· Meets the
guidelines
· Meets G/Lines,
legislation, bylaw
and standards
· Lack of formal
attraction program
beyond word of
mouth
· No formal
procedure for exit
interview in place
· None
· Min G/Lines
04-61-12
· OH&SA Section 27
subsections 1 &2
· E&R Bylaw
Section 17
· OFSS as
summarized in
Section E of back-
ground material
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Master Plan - Analysis - DRAFT April 3, 2003
Promotion
.
· Low turnover rate
· The Chief has
been successful at
identifying potential
Volunteer
Firefighters
· Satisfactory
· Knows why people
stay or leave
· Minimal turnover in
past 5 years (11 %
or 2% per year)
· Municipality
additionally
encourages career
development and
currency for Chief
and Deputy Chief
2
of,
Performance
Evaluations
· Min G/Lines
04-61-12
· OH&SA Section 1
Subsections 27&28
· Oro-Medonte
policies and
procedures
Job Descriptions
· OFSS as
summarized in
Section E of back-
ground materials
Wages and Benefits
· No guidelines or
standards
· Meets G/Lines,
legislation and
municipalities
policies and
procedures
· Additional
evaluations are
done through the
curriculum training
programs
· Approved by
C.A.O. and Council
· Meet minimum
standards
· Additional job
classifications met
through sections
on wage, benefits,
promotions and
hiring
· Municipality has a
wage and benefit
package for union
and management
employees as well
as VFF's
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Master Plan - Analysis - DRAFT April 3, 2003
3
Dispute Resolution . Min. G/Line . All employees are . There is no SOG
04-61-12 covered under one for Dispute
of the following: Resolution
Managem~nt
Concerns Policy,
Union Contract,
and the VFF
Dispute Resolution
Policy
Discipline . Min G/Line . Has a recognized
04-61-12 policy (see
appendices sec. 7)
that has been used
and is successful
Retirement . Min. G/Line . Covered by E&R
04-61-12 Bylaw Section 4-2
Office Space . OFM - Fire Station . Provides space for . Not all stations
Planning Design administration have adequate
Construction duties to be carried office space
out for each station
Collective Agreement . No G/Line or . The municipality
standard has a union
agreement which
covers the
technical support
position only and
not the VFF's
Health and Safety . Min. G/L 04-64-12 . Meets req'mnts of
. OH&SA G/L's, standard &
. Section 21 legislation through
. Bylaw 98-56 development and
implementation of
SOG's
4
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Master Plan - Analysis - DRAFT April 3, 2003
..
Bylaws (see section A
of background
materials and section
8 of the appendix)
All Bylaws are
referenced in these
sections which cover
all bylaws related to
Fire and Emergency
Services Department
· Min G/Line
01-03-12 &
04-80-01
· The entire FPPA
· Fire Works
Explosion Act
· POA Chapter P33
· Fire Code #6661
· Fire Underwriters
G/Lines 2.2.1
· NFPA # 291
· Has E&R Bylaw
that does not
address the new
FPPA
· Fire Prevention is
currently
addressed in the
E&R By-law
Sections 9 (3) and
14,15(1)
· Appointment of
Fire Chief and
Deputy Chief is
covered in By-law
94-13 & 14
respectively
· By-law 94-15 is
regarding
Inspectors under
the OBC that refers
to 1990 Building
Code Act
· By-law 98-67 is
Adoption of the
Emergency Plan
· By-law 98-56 is
regarding adoption
of OH&SA
· Does not have a
policy/bylaw to
address the FPP A
· Current E&R Bylaw
out of date
5
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Master Plan - Analysis - DRAFT April 3, 2003
By-laws continued
(See section A of
background materials
and section 8 of the
appendix) ....
By-laws regarding
Authorizing
Agreements
G/Lines and
Standards remain the
same
· By-law 99-81 is
regarding
Development
Charges
(apportioned to the
Fire Dept)
· By-law 99-4 is
regarding User
Fees
· By-law 94-65 is
regarding
Fireworks
· By-law 94-40
regarding retention
of records
· By-law 94-48
regarding Mutual
Aid Agreement
with the County of
Simcoe (currently
under revision by
Simcoe Fire Co-
ordinator and Fire
Chiefs)
· By":law 94-75
regarding Fire
Protection with
Springwater
Township
· No Fee Schedule
has been adopted
yet
6
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Master Plan - Analysis - DRAFT April 3, 2003
By-laws regarding
Authorizing
Agreements cont'd...
Standard Operational
Guidelines
· Min. G/Line
04-69-13
· Section 21
· NFPA 1500
· By-law 97-16 is
currently under
review regarding
delivery of 911
C.E.R.B. services
· By-law 98-42
regarding Barrie
Dispatch Services
· By-law 98-78
regarding joint use
of Communications
Tower
· By-law 99-108
regarding wild land
fire fighting within
County of Simcoe
· Has identified a
significant number
of Operational
Guidelines
· 001-1-21 does not
address absences
due to vacation or
illness
· 001-1-27 does not
specifically refer to
officer training and
development
7
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Master Plan - Analysis - DRAFT April 3, 2003
Standard Operational
Guidelines
continued ......
· Min. G/Line
04-69-13
· Section 21
· NFPA 1500
· Has identified a
significant number
of Operational
Guidelines
· 001-1-30 Dispute
Resolution does
not reflect chain of
command
procedures
· 001-1-31 does not
reflect urgency of
some situations,
e.g. verbal vs.
written
· 004-3-02 does not
make reference to
Section 21
· 004-3-08 does not
address the need
for eye protection
against
communicable
diseases
8
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Master Plan - Analysis - DRAFT April 3, 2003
Standard Operational
Guidelines
continued .....
· Min. G/Line
04-69-13
· Section 21
· NFPA 1500
· Has identified a
significant number
of Operational
Guidelines
· 011-3-07 does not
have sufficient
detail regarding
how personnel will
be "accounted for"
· 014-3-02 does not
indicate how
gloves and other
equipment are
disposed of
· 015 Forms shown
are no longer in
use
· 018 does not
include a policy
regarding who
should and how to
deal with the
media.
· There are several
other guidelines
that have not yet
been developed
9
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Master Plan - Analysis - DRAFT April 3,2003
Records Management
(Baker System)
· Min. G/Lines
02-04-23 and
04-85-13
· E&R By-law 12-4
Records Management · Same as above
(Ministry of
Transportation) for
drivers
Records Management · Same as above
WSIA
Records Management · Same as above
Communicable
Disease, Hazardous
Materials and
Vaccination
Records Management · Same as above
Professional
Development
· Is in the process of
developing a
computerized
records
management
system through
Baker (software
company)
· Meets G/Lines and
standards
· Meets G/Lines and
standards
· Records are kept
on vaccinations
only
· Most information is
available in hard
copy and digital
· System does not
cover fire
prevention, fire
inspections
· Personnel file does
not include any
WSIB claims and
their status
· No current tracking
for lost time
accidents that are
not WSIB related
e.g. sports or
actual employment
· Personnel files do
not record
exposure to
disease or
hazardous
materials
. Emergency
Response data
provides excellent
insight into
response times,
personnel on
scene, incident
type / location and
frequency etc.
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Master Plan - Analysis - DRAFT April 3, 2003
10
Records Management
Training Standards
· Same as above
Records Management
Discipline
Operating/Capital
Budget
· Same as above
· Min. G/Line
04-59-12
· Meet standards on
curriculum training,
(summary, lesson
plans, enabler)
· See specifics
under Training
· Notices are kept in
personnel file
· Municipality
receives annual
budget from the
Fire & Emergency
Services
Department
· Background
materials show
Operating Capital
Budget, 2001
11
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Master Plan - Analysis - DRAFT April 3, 2003
Fire Stations (Section B or Background Materials)
Fire Halls (by station)
· Min G/Line
02-04-23 and
04-12 -13
· NFPA 120117.1,
17.6
· OH&SA
· Section 21
· OFM Fire Hall
Design Document
· Ont. Building Code
(as required)
· E&R By-law
Sections 1 & 5
· SOG 002-3-05 &
002-3-12
Station # 1
Shanty Bay
· Has addressed
these requirements
through a
comprehensive
inventory of the
Fire Halls
· Has room for
apparatus
· Has training room
· Kitchenette
· Municipal water
· One washroom
only
· Limited storage
· No emergency
power
· No room for
additional
apparatus
· No showers
· Parking lot not
paved
12
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Master Plan - Analysis - DRAFT April 3, 2003
Station # 2
Hawkestone
· Good classroom
facility
· Office space
· Kitchen
· Storage
· Well Water
· One washroom
only
Station # 3
Horseshoe Valley
· Opened in 1996
and build to
specification of the
Fire Hall Design
Document (OFM)
· Municipal water
· Classroom
· Office space
· Kitchenette
· One washroom
only
· Well water
Station # 4
Rugby
· Air boat cannot be
accommodated
properly
· No showers
· Well water not
potable
· No emergency
power
· No system to
evacuate exhaust
fumes (unlike other
stations - has full
time staff)
· No showers
· No room for
additional
apparatus
· Parking lot not
paved
· No emergency
power
13
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Master Plan - Analysis - DRAFT April 3, 2003
Station # 5
Warminster
Station # 6
Moonstone
· Kitchenette
· Office Space
· Municipal water
· Washrooms with
showers
· Classroom
· Parking lot in good
condition
· Small office space
in station
· Washroom in main
building
· Municipal water
· No emergency
power
· No room for
additional
apparatus or office
space
· No emergency
power
· Classroom in
another building
(without running
water and
washroom
facilities)
· No showers
· Office space is in
another building
· Both buildings in
poor repair
· Parking lot not
paved
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Master Plan - Analysis - DRAFT April 3, 2003
14
Apparatus
· Min. G/Line
04-07-12, 04-12-13
& 02-04-23
· HT A (as required)
· ULC Standards
· OH&SA
· Section 21
· E&R By-law
Section 13-1,2,3 &
10
· SOG 002-3-5,6 &
12
· NFPA1201-17.1,
1901 and 1914
· Meets guidelines,
standards and
legislation (see
Risk Analysis by
station for details)
· Capital expenditure
forecast program in
place for
replacement of all
Fire & Emergency
apparatus
· Gathered and
reviewed additional
information as
requested by the
Master Plan
Committee
15
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Master Plan - Analysis - DRAFT April 3, 2003
Fire Prevention and Public Education (Section C of Background Materials)
Proactive and
Reactive Programs
· Min. G/Lines
01-02-01,
02-04-23,
04-39-12,
04-40-03,
04-40-12,
04-41A-13,
04-42-12,
04-45-12,
04-47-12
· SOG 022
· E&R Bylaw Section
15
· Fire Code Part II
· Min. G/Lines
01-02-01,
02-04-23,
· OBC O.Reg
403/97
· FPPA - Fire Code
Part VI
· E&R By-law
Sections 9 (3),
14(1)&(5)and
15
Inspections
· Has proactive
programs i.e.
Kiwanis Fire Safety
House
· Provides reactive
programs by
responding to
requests for
presentations for
schools and
community groups
· Does inspection on ·
a request and
complaint basis
(minimum req'd)
· Does annual
school inspections
· Other inspections
are done as time
permits
· Does not follow up
with evaluation
after program has
been delivered
Lacks Fire
Prevention Policy
that includes type,
frequency and
follow-up of
inspection
· No process 1
program in place to
accurately identify
the number of
businesses
requiring
inspections within
the Township
16
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Master Plan - Analysis - DRAFT April 3, 2003
Plans Examination
· Min. G/Line
04-48-12
Pre-Incident
Survey/Plan
· Min. G/Line
02-04-23
· NFPA Standard
1420
Investigations
· Min. G/Lines
02-04-23 and
04-52-12
· FPPA Part VI & III
· Min. G/Line
02-04-23
· Emergency Plan
Act 1983 Chapter
30
Disaster Planning
· Meets the
requirements
· Has
comprehensive
listing of building
stock with cross
referencing to
building and fire
codes
· Meets
requirements
· Has an Emergency ·
Preparedness and
Response Plan
· Fire and
Emergency
Services has a
good
understanding of
their place in the
plan
· Lacks specific
information
regarding use and
occupancy of these
buildings
· No SOG / Policy
regarding who
conducts
investigations
The plan has not
been tested
17
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Master Plan - Analysis - DRAFT April 3, 2003
Emergency Response (Section D of Background Materials)
Emergency Response
Time
Available Personnel
· Min G/Lines
01-02-01,04-08-12
and 04-12-13
· Section 21
Same as above
· Average response
times and
personnel numbers
(upon arrival at
scene) can be
calculated through
Firewatch
· Roll out time for
1997 -2001
average
· 16 VFF's per
station
· There are some
stations that are
lower than the 16
compliment
18
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Master Plan - Analysis - DRAFT April 3, 2003
Water Supply and
Mapping
· Min G/Line
02-04-13 and
02-04-23
· OFM Fire Dept
Management
Program Section
2-40
· Fire Underwriters
Survey Section 8-7
and 8-8
· NFPA 1231
· Have a map
identifying the
water sources that
are year round
· Have 6 tankers
that can provide
water throughout
the township
· Not all areas of the
township have
year round public
water sources
· Do not currently
have a policy in
place to access
private sources
e.g. ponds
19
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Master Plan - Analysis - DRAFT April 3, 2003
Training (Section E of Background Materials)
Ontario Firefighter
Standards
Station Specific
Training
Driver Training
(upgrading)
· Min. G/Line
02-04-23 and
04-81-01
· MTO
· HTA
· OH&SA Section 42
· Section 21
· Same as above
· Same as above
· Use standards as
their bench mark
for this training
· Does station in-
house training over
and above
curriculum training
· All training includes
appropriate
documentation and
tracking
· Excellent in house
program that
meets ministry
standards
· Ensures competent
and licensed
drivers within the
Fire & Emergency
Services
Department
20
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Master Plan - Analysis - DRAFT April 3, 2003
Apparatus and Vehicle · Same as above
Training
Recruitment Training · Same as above
OFM Curriculum
Same as above
· Recognizes need
· Have program in
place.
· Being used and
have 10 Trainer
Facilitators
· OFM curriculum
being used
Program Development Same as above
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Master Plan - Analysis - DRAFT April 3, 2003
21
Firefighting
Certification
· Based on an
international fire
safety accreditation
council FPPA
· Voluntary process
in which some of
the VFF have
chosen to
participate
. As of year 2001,
69 VFF's are
currently registered
in the Certification
Program
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Master Plan - Analysis - DRAFT April 3, 2003
22
,.
Communications (Section F of Background Materials)
"
Dispatch, Call Taking
and 911 C.E.R.B
Back-up
Check on O.P.P. 911
back-up
Pagers & Radios
· NFPA 1221
· Min.G/Line
02-04-23 and
04-64-12
· Industry Canada
Radio Standards
. Ministry Guideline
04-64-12 Industry
Canada Radio
Standards
· Purchase dispatch
service from Barrie
which is compliant
. O.P.P. answers
911 calls for Oro-
Medonte and then
downloads to
Barrie dispatch for
fire calls
. Uses hardware
and software at
Barrie Com. Center
. There are 2
methods of
accepting
emergency call:
911 and direct dial
numbers
· Barrie has
sufficient back-up
system
. Sudbury provides
back-up
. Using current
technology but
equipment will be
required to meet
new standards
effective 2004
. There are still
some 4 party-party
lines in the
Township, which
complicates the
911 answering
system
. pager and radio
coverage is
effected by poor
reception pockets
23
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Master Plan - Analysis - DRAFT April 3, 2003
Oro-Medonte Fire and Emergency Master Plan - Analysis - DRAFT April 3, 2003
24
tT
0"
,
CERTIFICATE OF COMPETENCY I CERTIFICAT DE COMPETENCE
CHAD ROBINSON
has complied with the requirements under Regulation 435/93 for the utility Operator Ucensing Program in
satisfait aux exigences du Programme de certification des operateurs d1nsta/lations, aux termes du Reg/ement 435/93
WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
RESEAUX D'APPROVISIONNEMENT EN EAU
OPERA TOR- IN- TRAINING/ APPRENTI(E)-OPERA TEUR(TRICE)
April 30, 2006
OT20153
J)~ 4k.'
~
~?i
.'
~
NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING
0b
^
\..J
FOR A PROPOSED TEMPORARY USE BY-LAW
FOR THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
P-150/03
TAKE NOTICE that the Council of the Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte wilJ hold a Public
Meeting on Wednesday, May 21, 2003 at 7:20 p.m. in the Municipal Council Chambers. The purpose of
the public meeting is to obtain public comments on proposed Temporary Use By-law, under Section 39 of
the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990 c. P. 13.
THE PROPOSED Temporary Use By-law Amendment would permit the development of a Garden Suite
for a period of ten years on lands within Concession 10, South West 1A Lot 23(formerly within the Township
of Medonte).
A KEY MAP for File P-150/03 is provided below.
ANY PERSON may attend the public meeting andlor make written or verbal representation either in support
of or in opposition to the proposed Amendments. If a person or public body that files an appeal of a decision
of the Township of Oro-Medonte in respect of the proposed Amendments does not make oral submission at
the public meeting or make written submissions to the Township before the proposed Amendments are
adopted, the Ontario Municipal Board may dismiss all or part of the appeal. If you wish to be notified of the
adoption of the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment, you must make a written request to Marilyn
Pennycook, Township Clerk, at the address noted below.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION relating to the proposed Temporary Use By-law is available for
inspection between 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. at the Township of Oro-Medonte Administration Building, in
the Planning Department.
DA TED at the Township of Oro-Medonte this 29th day of April 2003.
t
Severn Township
'-'-'\ \ -<c <...-'~
C~,~-~
.~ ,\,-cD.
/*,
.....-- Simcoe County District School Board
~ 1170 Highway 26
Midhurst, Ontario LOL 1XO
Phone: (705) 728-7570
Fax: (705) 728-2265
\)
( WJ'0)
't (1 i i\f (\1 ''; 1-: 1;:) Q I ^.
"""'_ IF''''':,.... .,~; ~....,~<.""', $ >'11. t ~ u
Mv i !Uj\J ~."-=-----
May 7, 2003
MAY 2 1 2003
RECEIVED I
M~V 9 2003
Ms. Marilyn Pennycook
Clerk
Township of Oro-Medonte
Planning Department
P.O. Box 100
Oro, ON
LOL 2XO
MEETn~G: COUNCIL I I
'Vv. 0
tJH(,NliiWUNTE
.--1QWNSHIP
P-151103
Dear Ms. Pennycook:
RE: PROPOSED ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT
MOUNT ST. LOIUS ROAD WEST
PT. WEST HALF LOT 10, CONCESSION 5
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE (MEDONTE)
Thank you for notification regarding the above-noted Public Meeting to consider a proposed
Zoning By-law Amendment. The subject property is proposed to be rezoned from the
Agricultural/Rural Exception 96 (A/RU*96) Zone to the Agricultural/Rural (A/RU) Zone to
permit the construction of a residential dwelling unit on the subject property.
Planning staff have no objections to the proposed rezoning application. Students residing in
this area of the municipality may attend Shanty Moonstone Elementary School and Midland
Secondary School.
Should you have any questions, please contact this office.
]4~
Holly Spacek, MCIP, RPP
Planning Officer
.
c
'\
coV' i ~
Cl- 0,~ ~L--
~ \ ~'\~p()I\C*~
~t':/>*<"'\
'"
......- Simcoe County District School Board
~ 1170 Highway 26
Midhurst, Ontario LOL 1XO ~ " ~-- -
Phone: (705) 728-7570 ~R(]-~'!i-: .:,>)\\~7C=
Fax: (705) 728-2265 - -1'-'" ""r" ,"C"-J '<J
! i?" '":,,;::'I'..:r t~ ~
MOTION~,~.=---~ =-
(
b
MAY Z 1 2003
RECE'''~D
MAY 9'MD
May 7, 2003
Ms. Marilyn Pennycook
Clerk
Township of Oro-Medonte
Planning Department
P.O. Box 100
Oro, ON
LOL 2XO
0I1U-11I1L.aJUNIE
TO~~'"""
MEETING: COUNCIL a2rf
L C.~~::~_~J
P-150/03
Dear Ms. Pennycook:
RE: PROPOSED TEMPORARY USE BY-LAW
6331 LINE 9 NORTH
WEST PT. LOT 23, CONCESSION 10
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE (MEDONTE)
Thank you for notification regarding the above-noted Public Meeting to consider a proposed
Temporary Use By-law pursuant to Section 39 of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990c. P. 13. The
subject property is proposed to be used as a Garden Suite for a period of ten years.
Planning staff have no objections to the proposed rezoning application. Students residing in
this area of the municipality may attend Waubaushene Elementary Public School and
Midland Secondary School.
Staff also advise that an Education Development Charge of $761.00 does not apply to
development applications for Garden Suites or " Granny Flats" , provided that the following
conditions are met:
. The proposed modular home will be used as a " granny flat" for a period of up to ten (10)
years;
. and the applicants have entered into an agreement with the Township with respect to the
conditions within which it would be erected and its eventual removal.
. "," ~..
. A copy ofthe Council Resolution and the Development Agreement, and the completed
Building Permit Application are filed with the Planning Department of the Simcoe
County District School Board.
Planning staff ask to be notified if the temporary use is renewed for an additional period of
time. We also request notification when the use ceases and the modular home is removed
from the property.
Should you have any questions, please contact this office.
pr~
Holly 2e~;, RPP
Planning Officer
2
C(L"cf2~
~ ,~'-1(f)
r': ~::::2~OUnty ~~iC~:~rd
~ Mldhurst, Ontario LOL 1XOJ ORO-.'\.f]""'.f';t'1>i."J~.'... ~.': r,
Phone: (705) 728-7570 t ~~~~~.:'.~:; :;~ .. '{
Fax: (705) 728-2265 i _. r"!"! ..;';' L' l:~\J. ;"":.;' It~;l
I MOl J v i J \r ~--=-~''''-'. .... "~!!;~..".
I J r- RECf'tlfD
I MAY 212003 ! / o::""~u:
~ MEETING: COUNCIL. ILl I ._TOW~'~""tI
C. OF W. L j f:
,
.~~
1; .
\
May 7, 2003
Ms. Marilyn Pennycook
Clerk
Township of Oro-Medonte
Planning Department
P.O. Box 100
Oro, ON
LOL 2XO
P-149/03
Dear Ms. Pennycook:
RE: PROPOSED TEMPORARY USE BY-LAW
1849 OLD BARRIE ROAD WEST
WEST PT. LOT II, CONCESSION 3
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE (ORO)
Thank you for notification regarding the above-noted Public Meeting to consider a proposed
Temporary Use By-law pursuant to Section 39 of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990c. P. 13. The
subject property is proposed to be used for Motorcross Events.
Planning staff have no objections to the proposed rezoning application. Students residing in
this area of the municipality may attend W.R. Best Memorial Public School and Eastview
Secondary School.
Should you have any questions, please contact this office.
IA~I;;~
HOII~k' MCIP, RPP
Planning Officer
L---; I? a/
CC ~,/::s, .'
L-- ,/[yJ)
i
!
\
i
\
..
J
!
'j
,
I,
Re: Proposed Motocross Track;
Comer of Line 2 and Old Barrie Road]
I
.,
'.
To: Oro/Medonte Township Council
ORO-IV1EDONTE
TOWNSHiP.
\ViOTION i:J. 1'1-',
1 8 2003
:raAY 2 1 2003
Dear Sirs
Ii
L
This morning I was reading this week's edition of the "Ontario Farmer". In the
fITst section, the centre fold page was dedicated to Ontario's Agricultural Fairs. It was
entitled "Gateway to the Fair" and it lists numerous agricultural/rural fairs, their dates and
contact persons. You can rest assured that the Oro World's Fair was duly represented.
These images of the fair, the school children marching around the track, the
exhibits, the animals, seem in sharp contrast to the proposed motocross/motorcycle racing
park intended for the second concession and Old Barrie Road.
Is there any possible benefit to this proposal? I have this image of people ITom
the city trailering their motorcycles here for the day, bringing with them their noise and
air pollution and then going home at night. We just have to look less than five miles
away into Springwater Township where there already exists a motocross track. Have any
of the council members been around this area the last few Sundays to listen to those
races? Not only the air and noise pollution but also what about liability issues should
someone be injured? By sanctioning these events might the township be named in a
lawsuit if an accident occurred? I would suggest that the benefits to the township are few
and the drawbacks significant.
As elected members of Oro/Medonte Council we entrust you to lead our township
in the appropriate direction. I do not believe that this is the appropriate direction. I do not
believe that we need another motocross track within five miles of an' existing one. I do
not believe that this is an appropriate use of agricultural land. I am concerned that if
council allows this under a temporary use bylaw that when this expires three years ITom
now, a new council will have a difficult time saying no to an existing facility in which
already a lot of time and money has been spent.
I thank you for your time in reading this letter. I ask you to give some thought to
the rural nature of our township and with that in mind make your decision. I oppose this
proposal and I encourage the members of council to stand up now and vote no.
NiEETING: COUNCIL ~
C.OFW. CJ
Yours truly,
-'~/a ~
--j '-<-. /? ":> ~ -----
~-
Tom McIntyre
2072 Line 1 North, Oro
If-,.,',
~-
~~
~'-J . H< D ,
1\101101\1 ~'f-
P.O. Box 37, Station Main
Barrie, ON L4M 4S9
May 12, 2003
.,
DELIVERED BY HAND
MAY 2 1 2003
Township of Oro-Medonte
P.O. Box 100,
Oro, ON LOL 2XO
MEETING: COUNCIL
C.OFW.
~I
o
REeF"n: rf~'7
MA Y 1 220m
Ot1u-IWIQlUNIt.
--~~
Attention:Marilyn Pennycook, Clerk
Re: Proposed Temporary Use By-LawP-149/03
Public Meeting May 21, 2003 at 7:40 p.m.
Dear Ms. Pennycook:
We have recently received notice that an application has been made by Mr. John Graham of
1849 Old Barrie Road West on behalf of the Canadian Motocross Racing (CMX) requesting that
a "Temporary Use By-Law" be passed by Oro-Medonte Council that would permit motocross
events on lands within concession 3 West Part 11 of the former Oro T ownship. We are advised
by township officials that this By.Law could sanction up to four weekend events annually for a
period of three years if approved as submitted. The parties would be free to apply for continued
use for a further undetermined length of time.
As owners of farm property immediately adjacent to this location, we must speak in opposition
to this application. This part ofOro-Medonte Township is zoned RurallAgricultura1.This type of
activity belongs in a properly zoned commercial/industriallocation in order to minimize the
disturbance factor of noise and traffic, and to control environmental damage. We feel that this
application is an attempt to establish a long term commercial motocross track in a zone that
clearly is not intended for that purpose in the Official Plan. These events are organized and
sanctioned by an official motocross association and admission is charged. This is not simply a
case of a few local individuals getting together once in a while.
Apparently, this location was used last year for an event in the spring and fall by obtaining a
"Limited Use Permit" from the township for the individual events. The previous temporary
approval should not be a justification for this applicant to request increased operation at this site.
Weare of the understanding that some preliminary work has already been done by the township
in respect to creating a "Special Events Permit By-Law" to handle these types of situations and
thus ensure that they do not become a long term exception to land use policies. We strongly feel
that the township should be committing themselves to the development of a "Special Events By.
Law" rather than utilizing a ''Temporary Use By-Law" to give a long-term approval for three
years.
1')-
~
.
-2-
If council feels there is a need to address this application prior to the implimentation of a Special
Events Bylaw~ we feel that any approval should be for a period no longer than the council's
current mandate ending this year, and include logical limitations controlling how these events are
being run. Last year two events were held and now the applicants have requested that the
number of events be doubled to four, a 100% increase. Since this fann appears to be wet in the
spring and fall, these events would be crowded into a four-month continuous schedule from June
until September. We respectfully request that the number of these events held each year be
reduced. Weare advised that these events are to be a one-day event and will take place on the
Sabbath. However, this past year participants seemed to arrive on Saturday and a great deal of
noise was noted on both days as riders tested their equipment. We feel that if approved some
limitations must be enforced in respect to the number of days and hours of operation for these
events in order to minimize their intrusion to local residents.
In conclusion, we feel that this location must not be pennitted to expand into a fully operational
pennanent motocross track at the expense of other taxpayers in the area. The Council of the
Township of Oro-Medonte must consider the long tenn effect of approving this application and
should explore other alternatives. An endorsement of this application as presented is setting a
precedent on which future applicants seeking to locate activities in areas not properly zoned for
their purposes may use this approval as their justification for similar rulings.
We would like to thank the members of the Council of the Township ofOro-Medonte for their
consideration of the infonnation and comments provided herein. We asked that we be advised in
writing of any decision made in respect to this application.
Yours respectfully,
//
f'. /7 "/ //p ./ _//' ./ d
\~;tt~d~V.C~~L_//..;...A.// ~/~...... ~.... ~
/ /~~7 ~7.
Brenda G. Campbell/Leonard G. Campbell
~5'-;:33- 00 g':;;-
rob\\c
Page 1 of 1
~
C ~0-t\~ S
L_ \~ , \-1e D~
Pennycook
From: Andy Karaiskakis
Sent: Wednesday, May 21,20037:48 AM
To: Marilyn Pennycook; Gary Smith
Subject: FW: Temporay Use Zoning Change - Motor Cross Park - Pld Barrie Road and the 2nd of Oro-
Medonte
-----Original Message-----
From: David Scandrett [mailto:ScanD@mcw.net]
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2003 11:00 PM
To: planning@oro-medonte.ca
Cc: Sarah and Scott Webster
Subject: Temporay Use Zoning Change - Motor Cross Park - Pld Barrie Road and the 2nd of Oro-Medonte
To whom it may concern,
I live at 2442, 2nd Line of Oro Medonte-North and I wish to express my disagreement with the proposed use change for this
application. I feel that this is a noxious use, it will rapidly become a full time facility, and that the community is well served
by the current motor cross facilities at both Springwater Township and at Beds Creek on Hwy 11. Beds Creek also plays host
to the Barrie Speed Way. Both these locations have measures in place to accommodate the crowds for parking,sanitation etc.
In the winter we are subjected to the snow cross races at Horseshoe Valley Resort. These are noisy, air polluting events but
there is only one of them and they facilities have the capacity to absorb the load. I also have concerns for the environmental
aspects as I believe the property in question has a water course that may have ground water implications. Are these not EP
lands?
Now on each weekend we are subject to the noise pollution that emanates from the Springwater motor cross facility, the
motor cross road races that are now frequent in the area, not to mention the A TV and motor cross bikes that now use the
Simcoe county forests with unregulated abandon. We do not need yet another facility that will contribute little to the quality
oflife in this allegedly agrarian community. Please deny this application.
D Scandrett
2442 R.R. No 2 Shanty Bay
LOL 2LO
ORO-MEDONTE
TOiNNSH!P It qA
MOTiON i,t. . -.
728-3971
HAY 2 1 2003
scand@mcw.net
fVJEETI!\]G. COUNCIL
\~
r;. l) ~.;- '_'\1 ~
,---,
t.-.J
'................_"""~---,. --.~.~;:"...,-:.,....--
'5/21/2003
PETITION
o " II ~.)
{)J0LMCp
rtu ().4 /0 ~ ,
TO THE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF COUNCIL
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE:
WE, the undersigned, would like to express our concerns of noise and
hours of operation with respect to the moto-cross activities being
carried out at Cone. 2, Oro-Medonte. We understand these lands are
currently zoned agricultural and as such, should not be used for
promotion of moto-cross or any form of racing activities.
ADDRESS
PHONE
0:; I-h-O ..J
\480 L \~.e- t ,J
t4Bo i-I~E \ N
l480 LI).J8 I t-J
I 4-e,o L I )0 € I I--J
7"5. l-Q43.4
/1
(r
( t
-; ....~ '?~~
" ,,~ -~.. --- ~/ ::>
?28 - 1- ~r1-c;
I
..::..- ,__~"'I'fi'~~,":,.:::;:.:::!::^-==;..:';
,
~ViEE'n;\lt-;:
.-
(\
~I). ~~
rLo~' (03,
~.)
L-t--d . fie D
..
Walter Bachinski & Janis Butler
152 Drury Mill Road
RR#2 Shanty Bay, ON
LOL 2LO
(705) 721-0753
walter. bachinski@sympatico.ca
1
~..:. ?~""'. .,'\fr\~~!,J1p I''" 'cK
~ ~ ~",,;UUi\hJt ilca ~ I~
! fVl 0 T ! 0 j~ :,';: "'-=-
May 20, 2003
i
,
~
t \
~
I .
.\n:--....-'f.......Pj! H\~'"'I! I Y
,,!ct:- j \j\".. \'\.k,~I'..~." = ~\
\~.:, f~ lrJ~ c:J i
.._,'- -~,".. ..._,- ---.....".:;;:;::,.,)
.------.---.-.,..,...,,..... .
t1AY 2 1 2003
To the Mayor and Councillors ofOro-Medonte
This is a letter to oppose the proposed changes to the by-law permitting temporary use for
motocross racing on the property on the corner of the Second Line of Oro and the Old Barrie
Road.
We oppose this change to allow motocross events, under any conditions, for the following
reasons:
1) Noise pollution
We were subjected to a number of weekends last summer where the noise was so intense and
irritating that we were forced to curtail our normal outdoor week end activities. These activities
included both social gatherings and the usual gardening and outdoor chores. Some of the events
we planned last summer had to be held indoor because the noise ITom the motocross event
prevented normal conversation. Luckily the outdoor marriage ceremony of our daughter took
place on a weekend when there was no such event!
Because the prevailing winds are from the northwest, we are directly on the sound pathway ITom
this farm. We choose to live in the country because we desire a peaceful ambience. We work
hard, as do our neighbours, during the week and need the weekends as a time for reflection and
recuperation. Those of us who have an interest in spiritual values are particularly put off by the
ra<:ket on Sundays. Having to give up our normal o~tdoor pleasure for a good percentage of
summer weekends does not make sense when the summer season is so short.
The noise ITom these vehicles travels a great distance downwind and this is verified by many of
our neighbours. The noise is such a concern that they are either here this evening or they have
signed a petition that we have circulated. We were told by the Oro-Medonte Council office last
year when we complained about the noise, that the adjacent neighbours were in agreement with
this activity. We were quite disheartened by this. We were also puzzled as to why they would be
so compliant about such a racket. However, this year, in talking to one couple it became a little
clearer. This couple runs a B&B and the owner admitted she was grateful that usually her guests
were out for the day and wouldn't have to listen to the noise. She stated that even though the
noise was bothersome and they couldn't sit out when the event was on, they wouldn't oppose the
bylaw change because they wanted to support their neighbour. This appears to us to be misguided
"
..
(
as it permits something that will have a very negative impact on a large number of families. On
further investigation, we found one other supportive neighbour is renting land trom the owner of
the property in question, so obviously it would not be in his best interest to offend his landlord.
We believe that the Council must see this zoning change as different trom many others, because of
the distance the noise travels. We were told by the bylaw officer that council usually gives the
greatest weight to adjacent neighbours. We would like to question this concept, and are noting
reasons for the compliance of some neighbours, in the hope that your worship and councillors
may get a more accurate assessment of the opposition to this change. This re-zoning decision
doesn't just affect adjacent properties, because the noise travels at a nuisance level for several
kilometers in the direction of the wind. In this particular case, the normal weighting of opinion,
with greatest emphasis given to adjacent properties, should be reconsidered..
2)Environmental concerns
There must be an environmental assessment done on the property before considering the
development of a motocross raceway. Is the township aware of the implications and liabilities of
pollution and other damage to the headwaters of a fresh water stream and associated wetlands?
We have already observed considerable earth moving activity on the property and we wonder how
much damage has already been done to the environment. Who is monitoring this significant and
perhaps devastating effect on the landscape?
, .
a) Loss of habitat. Wean only guess what effect this noise pollution and physical invasion is
having on the creek and wetlands running through the property to be re-zoned. We do know
from our own land, which is a short distance downstream, that the creek, cedar forest and
surrounding wetland are home to a great variety of wildlife. Our understanding is that the
motocross activity occurs in areas of the property that are wet and this has us concerned. Are they
filling in wetland to create this course? Does the activity and noise have a detrimental effect on
the wildlife? Surely, with the pressure on development in general, we should be trying to protect
these natural wetlands whenever possible.
b) Sewage From observing the events last summer, we noted that there were a large number of
tents and motor homes; it was apparent that many people were free-camping for each of the
weekend events. Our concern here again is environmental. Even though portable toilets solve
some of the problems, there is still the issue of sewage water from people washing themselves and
dishes. Where does this water end up?
c) Pollutants from fuel. Other type of pollutants generated by the motorbikes and the track are
also of concern. What about fuel and oil spillage? Does this all end up in the headwaters of the
creek that flows through our property and eventually into the Nottawasaga system.?
..
...
t
3) The long-term plan for Oro-Medonte
How does the allowance of this change of zoning fit in with the long-term plan for Oro-Medonte?
a) Duplication. There is already a motocross facility in Oro at Burl's Creek Family Event Park
on Hwy 11 and the 8th line. Last year they had a full season of motocross events, at least 7 or 8
events. Why do we need another such facility so close? It seems a duplication that will undermine
the success of the already operating Burl's facility.
b) No! to business at any cost. This proposed activity will not create jobs for the area; it is simply
a part-time money maker for a few individual5and is accompanied by a large and noisy nuisance
factor. Let's weigh the costs!
c) Inappropriate change. This is not an appropriate change of zoning for a piece ofland that is
currently zoned agricultural. This property is in the middle of an active farming community. All
the surrounding fields are under cultivation or provide pasture for grazing livestock. One can only
imagine the stress suffered by the domestic animals in the vicinity, as a result of the constant, high
pitch noise.
d) Devaluation of real estate. When an activity deemed undesirable, in this case extreme noise
pollution, is parachuted into a community property values decrease.
e) Quality of life. Barrie and the surround area has doubled in population over the last 10 years
and this increase is being felt in Oro-Medonte as well. Historically, the attitude in the township
has been that any business is good business. Now is the time to think of shifting this focus. The
township must become more discerning about the type of business it allows and its affect on the
quality oflife for those who live here. There are more and more residences being constructed in
Oro-Medonte and the prime motivation for people wanting to live here has to do with the
traditional pleasures of country living. Certainly the'township, in its promotional activity is
encouraging people to settle here. It seems contradictory to consider allowing activity that is
counterproductive to a wholesome lifestyle.
...
Sincerel/ dLh ~~(
,-,~t:J:.-
Walter Bachinski and Janis Butler
rh jjatk.
~ l)fL'j
f1if5-
. .
~.L)-
L-fJ . t-'\ cp
.J> Jl fj I
1't--..:..=.-~-~~
The Webster Family
2320 Line 2 North
RR#2
Shanty Bay, Ontario
LOL 2LO
MAY 2 1 2003
Township of Oro-Medonte
Line 7 South
Oro Station, Ontario
t=.J
May 21,2003
Re: Proposed Temporary Moto-Cross Site, Line 2 and the Old Barrie Road
To Whom It May Concern:
I wish to express my sadness at the proposed facility on the Old Barrie Road and
the 2nd Line. With two facilities well established in close vicinity, one in
Springwater, and one at Burl's Creek, I question the need for another one, in land
that is designated agricultural. My concerns are as follows:
. Has the Nottawasaga Conservation Authority been asked to look at the
location for possible wetlands, or perhaps Environmentally Protected
Areas?
. Is this part of the "Official Plan" of Oro-Medonte, or more importantly is this
"good planning"?
. Have the Archaeological Records been checked for possibilities of any
Aboriginal significance? There are notes on record by well known Simcoe
Historians of such sites, with a possible location on Line 2 of Oro-
Medonte.
. What is the need of 3 facilities in close proximity to each other?
I ask that our council look at this application very carefully before making a
decision. There are many areas that are unclear. Given that there are already
these types of facilities available in abundance, I am against this proposal being
approved. Thank you.
S. Webster
<.. .~ \ 2)hJ..~ \\ ~J~
;-~1~8'-t.t1Y-~ }
~'J., I ~)wr
~~tIO~'
Wednesday, 21,2003
Attn: The Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte
To Whom It May Concern:
We are writing this letter to voice our objection to the by-law cha~ge thaf1AY 2 1
would allow the moto-cross races to take place on Edgar-Rugby Road. .4.s property
owners on the 3rd line of Oro-Medonte, Lot 12, our land lies south east of the /
proposed site. MEETING: COUNCIL b
J C.OFVJ. CJ
Last year's events created unbearable noise levels which were disruptive ..- -, ~ ..... -....
both outside on our property and inside our home with the windows shut. Aside
from our personal annoyance we believe the property provides a wilderness
corridor that will be affected by the incessant noise and possible erosion
contaminating the creek and wetland.
Access to the proposed course lies between two sharp curves on a highly traveled
road, which could create a very dangerous traffic hazard.
In 1972 we chose to move to this agricultural community to raise our family
in a quiet, rural environment. The continuous racket of motorcycles from morning
to night is very stressful and comparable to living beside a freeway listening to the
constant din of transport trucks and cars.
We feel betrayed by the council of Oro-Medonte that we were not notified of
the proposed by-law change, tonight's meeting, and the initial races that took place
last summer. If this moto-cross park is approved it will greatly depreciate
everyone's property value and ruin valuable agricultural land for years to come.
We would like to invite all council members to spend a relaxing?? weekend
at our home during one of these events.
Sincerely,
n .nyJ.ni...../
~ . ,-.~.
~ {Renee ~i j~ani .
ct~/v~~~"
Lindy BaJg~rten
~. (~~ n~(.C\J.:&V\)
\J
Ingrid Cingolani
~ I, ~., ~1
, m';,/ 'f0~v
D~rryB... Step~n
.1:/"'\ .;~. ~" \
/ "'-.Cii\ i -, ._........
',~,~,...< \\..4 "', '1 ~~\" ,~
AI~..le '~B.~~~~
d/M~ ~~yz~it~-
To the Mayor and Members of Oro-Medonte Council:
I) - f )
~j. ~ :f'1Cp
~~=--
,-',r-,f"'" r f'!F'~I""'."'!<<.o"""E
!#h:....'0,\J!i::U ~.)N !-
; ~no..,.!r'." (J~J7
! Iii ! .vl\) ==---~
I wish to object to the temporary use bylaw which would allow m1tocross
events on the corner of the Old Barrie Road and Line 2 Oro. J MA.ti 2 1 2003
A motocross event park already exists several miles away in Sprin~water
Township and there are times when it sounds like they are racing i1'\v~TiNG: COUNCIL ~!
backyard. The noise from the loudspeakers, the music and the d~ bikes is C. OF W. D'J
quite clear and has a negative impact on the normally quiet, rural' . , .. - .-. ,---- .4..w
environment of our home. Why would we want to sanction another such
event park when one already exists so closeby? How is the noise from this
proposed facility going to be controlled so that neighbouring properties and
those farther away will not be disturbed or adversely affected? How does
this affect the value of our properties? Furthermore, we already have another
facility in Oro, which has everything already in place to host such an event,
namely Burls Creek Events Park. Is this good planning, to sanction another
events park, subject more residents to more noise and inconvenience, when
suitable facilities already exist? I am not opposed to home business or
enterprises when they do not impact on the residents living in the area. In
this case, this proposal will have too much of a noise impact on the
community to ignore it.. Does the noise bylaw apply to this application?
This proposal should not be approved for the noise impact alone.
~J).
,
r
...
..
. ,
...
Another concern surrounds the temporary use designation. My experience
with other such events has been that once the temporary designation is
granted, the event is as good as permanent. Bearing in mind that the
landowner will probably be investing time and much money developing a
property, how could the council not grant the continuation of this motocross
event in the future without an outcry from the landowner. Can council
encourage this use now and then discourage it in the future? What happens if
next year, the proponent wishes to have 6-8 races instead of 4, would that be
acceptable? Perhaps they might wish to host other similar events, in
addition to the motocross events----would that be acceptable? If you open
the door to these racing events now, you have to consider that this could
escalate and we could have something very different from the 4 motocross
events happening here in the future. Is this what council envisions for this
property? Do we need another events park?
My third concern surrounds environmental, health and safety issues.
..
#
One cannot really guess how many people might attend such events because
advertising can playa large role and events can grow. Is this property able
to handle a large influx of cars, in all kinds of weather and field conditions
(i.e. mud)? Is camping allowed on agricultural land in conjunction with the
events? What if attendance is so large that cars outnumber parking spots,
will parking overflow onto the Old Barrie Road? How will this impact the
Old Barrie road traffic and the sometimes dangerous Dalston -93
intersection? Has the OPP been asked to comment on the implications of
this bylaw? Will music and loudspeakers be allowed? I recall that several
years ago, a rave held at the Barrie Automotive Flea Market, caused a major
disturbance in Oro Station due to the noise? How are these kinds of
disturbances going to be prevented and the noise bylaw enforced?? Will
alcohol consumption be allowed on the property? Who will enforce that?
Has the health unit been asked to comment on safety and health issues? Will
there be proper washroom and handwashing facilities for those attending?
Will food be provided? Are facilities in place to ensure that it will be safely
prepared, stored and served?
Most importantly, what is the environmental impact of this proposal? I
assume that there will be gasoline supplied and stored on the property. What
environmental hazards does this pose? There is a creek nearby, will it's
course be altered in any way to prepare the facility? What about erosion or
contamination of these waters? Has the Conservation Authority been invited
to inspect the property to comment on these or other contamination issues?
Has there been an environmental assessment? This definitely needs to be
done before this bylaw can even be considered?
We trust council to make good decisions for the township. This proposal
does not benefit anyone except the proponent, but introduces many
inconveniences and unknowns, and has a greater impact on a much larger
area than one would assume. I hope that you will consider these concerns
when making your decision.
c UI!
VJI,~~
Ann McIntyre c733~316)
2072, Line 1 N
~'of.
,9....1 103
C-
1'0 f'-1 cO.
. ,'"
. .,-..
t II"'! " ^
1 I ...
r
..
May 21,2003
;;_. 111~i1
~(~? ~
...;~ *'-------"-::-:-;::~. 1
I
I
,
\
UNCIL ~
~ 101 r-I I
l,.,. ."\,. L.......J.I
.~___....~~~.~,:t
HAY 2 1 2003
ouncil & Staff
To: Mayor Cra'
Re: Tempovary Re-Zoning of Agricultural Land For Motocross Competition Track
This application has raised the following questions:
What is the function of an Official Plan?
What constitutes the need for amendments to this Official Plan?
Does this application comply with the requirements and vision of the Official Plan?
By allowing temporary re-zoning does it circumvent most governmental controlling
agencies?
(ie. MOE, Health Unit, Ground Water Study, etc.)
Is this agricultural land in the confines of the Oro Moraine?
Let's be consistent with our interpretations of zoning and Official Plan and the
enforcement of it.
Will this provide employment for area residents?
Will this increase our tax base?
Is it appropriate to take this productive agricultural land out of the Canadian Food Land
Bank?
Donald Hanney
President
"Canadian Safety Council Sanctioned Training Facility"
Burl's ere! F~il~~~ ro~ O~ Phone: 705,487'3663 Fax: 705'487-6280 Web: www.burlscreek.com E-mail: burlscreekpork@burlscreek.com
.. . '-
..
Burl's Creek Family Event Park
From:
To:
Sent:
Subject:
"Don Hanney" <don@burlscreek.com>
"Harry Hughes" <hhughes@bconnex.net>
Monday, February 10, 200310:34 AM
Fw: Moto Cross Zoning
- Original Message -
From: Lisa Groves
To: Don P. Hanney
Sent: Thursday, December 16, 20026:30 PM
Subject: Moto Cross Zoning
Mayor Craig, Council & Staff,
Subject: Moto Cross Racing Competition on Agricultural land
Just a wee note or concem from the Ozark Mountains of Arkansas.
My concem arises from reading a newspaper article on the proposal by Tom Beaton to operate Moto Cross
Racing another year on agricultural land.
Please let us be consistent with our interpretations of zoning and official plan and enforcement of same.
Refresh my memory, was not one of the plans of our OPA that of maintaining our agricultural land and to
provide peace and solitude for all to enjoy?
Yes, I have a vested interest in this issue. In order for my firm to compete with aRace Facility on Agricultural
land, I should have a reduction in taxes or the other property owner's taxes should be increased to provide a
level playing field. this property owner should also comply with proper zoning.
Our multi use facility for ATV Training, Moto Cross Competitions, Truck & Tractor Pulls was developed many
years ago on a defunct gravel pit, adjacent to a major highway that produces noise levels exceeding 100
decibels.
Thank you for returning this request for another intrusion into our rural lifestyle, to staff for their study and
recommendations. I will await the Staff and Councils written decision on this matter.
At" m~in~~a ... ' 7'
~ ~ c~ c::.. t:.> t:- .:..-
Don a
President
Burl's Creek Family Event Park
5/20/2003
..
~e
L
~s
~ V\(ip
, ;. ~:.4 ~:::: 2~ounty Dist~i:~~C~~OI B~~r~
, ~~~~~~S(~~;~;~7~~~ 1XO r ORO-MEDONTE ,
Fax: (705) 728-2265 j TOWNSHiP n + l't \
\ MOTION:;f.=--
\ MAY 2 1 2ij03
~.
\ MEETlN~:~~~~_?J
May 21,2003
j REC~i
I
j
/ O~;.~E:o~~e
,--!OWNSH'P
Ms. Marilyn Pennycook, Clerk
Township of Oro-Medonte
P.O. Box 100
Oro, ON
LOL 2XO
Dear Ms. Pennycook:
RE: COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
HORSESHOE RESORT VALLEY LANDS
PT. LOTS 3,4 & 5, CONCESSION 1
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
Thank you for circulating Notice of the Public Meeting to be held jointly by the
Township of Oro-Medonte on May 21, 2003. The applicants are proposing to develop
"Horseshoe V alley Village" a resort type community of new commercial development
containing an additional 987 units, mainly in the form of hotel, condo-hotel and timeshare
units. Approximately 202 of the proposed 987 units will be "non-commercial"
townhouse units but these units are not anticipated to be occupied by traditional families.
The anticipated build-out of the village will be over ten to fifteen years.
W.R Best Memorial Public School and Eastview Secondary School are the receiving
schools for pupils residing in this part of the township.
Planning staff are not opposed to the expansion of "Horseshoe Valley Village"but
request that the standard conditions be inserted into the conditions of Draft Plan
Approval:
. That the owner agrees to include in all offers of purchase and sale a statement that advises the
prospective purchaser that the public schools on designated sites in the community are not
guaranteed. Attendance at schools in the area yet to be constructed is also not guaranteed.
Pupils maybe accommodated in temporary facilities and/or be directed to schools outside of
the area.
",
~
. That the owner agree to include in all offers of purchase and sale a statement that advises the
prospective purchaser that school busses will not enter cuI de sacs and pick up points will
generally be located on through streets convenient to the Board. Additional pick up points
will not be located within the subdivision until major construction activity has been
completed.
In addition, planning staff request that the following warning clause be inserted into the
subdivision agreement:
" Purchasers, renters, lessees are warned that there are no schools planned within this
subdivision, or within walking distance of it and that pupils may be accommodated in
temporary facilities and/or be directed to facilities outside of the area. "
We are in receipt of a copy of the CDP for Horseshoe Resort as provide by PK Menzies
Planning & Development Inc.
Yours truly,
///lC;:: j'
/jV-vj r~
Holly Spacek, MCIP, RPP
Planning Officer
cc: Ms. Gail White, Planner
County of Simcoe
Ms. Kris Menzies, President
PK Menzies Planning &
Development
2
May-Zl-03 . 11 :03am From-
~-e. V
vue I.
T-522 P.001/002 F-270 /
fu~~.Q~~ ~, ~',/.
tJ~.
r
1'-;
""
Simcoe Muskoka
Catholic District School Board
46 Alliance Blvd.
Barrie, Ontario L4M 5K3
Telepho11c (705) 722-3555
Pax (705) 722-6534
~'O~"V'V'P . 1
'!.; .u d.'~~~ (;~, '-J "*' 1
MOTION .J
May 20, 2003
Z 1 20U3
The Township of Oro-Medonte
Planning and Developmt.'"Ilt Deparnm:nt
P.O. Box 100
Ora, ON
LOL 2XO
MEETING: COUNCiL ~!
C.
Attention: Mr. Gary Smith
Planner
VIA FAX ONLY: 705-487-0133
Re: CO~NTLETTER
A.pplication f.or Proposed C.omprehensive Development Plan
Horseshoe Valley Village
Part .of Lots 3 and 4, Concession 1
Horsesh.oe Vaney Road West
(F.ormerly Medontc and Or.o)
T.ownship .of Oro-Medonte
Dear Gary Smith:
The Sim:::oe Muskoka Calholic District School Board would like to rc;:,-pond to your notice dated Apn129,
2003, looking for comments on the: proposed Comprehensive J)eveIop:ment Plan for Horseshoe Valley
Village, m the Tovmship of Oro-Medonte. The subject 1ands arc located on the north and $Ourh side of
Horseshoe Valley Road Ridge Road, bet\VeeI1 Line 3 North and line 4 North, \Vithin the Horseshoe Valley
Settlement NOOe Boun.dary. More specifically, the proposal cODsists of the development of 987 residential
units.
.Any pupils that are generated "by ti1is development aTe within the current catchment area for Sister
Catherine Donnelly Catholic School, .and. St.. Joseph's High School, both located in the City of
Barrie. It is noted that Sister Catherine DonneHy has a current Ministry of Education rated
capacity of 546.5 pupils, and is scheduled to open in Septcmber, 2003.
The Board understands that this development is intended to contain non-permanent residential
units, and which nlay include an Adult Lifesty1e Community. Our Boa:rd would like to receive
c:larification on the following issues:
(1) A brief summary of how this development will be marketed to adult life$tyle families;
(2) wm this development gua:,antee that young families V,l'ith children will not be attracted to this
devc10pment and if so, how'Nill this be accomplished?
J'\-PJ...AN"N)NG,^.JWlJ~\Cir;;.u1f.liMI RC!:pO~c:;\,0m-rn::,JOf\tc"2003\CQmprthcn~'Vt ~y f'W\ ~ H~r;'ZboC' Va.llc:y V;llogr:..do,:;:
I May-21-03 ,11: 03am F rom-
T-522 P.002/002 F-27Q
.,
11rust that the above comments are saJisfactory at Uris time. W t want to confum our continued interest 1n tbis
development application process, and will a'Wait yourresponse to the above prior to finalising our comments.
lfyou have a.uy questions or comments about the Board's response, please feel nee to contact Mr.
Garry Lambright, or the undersigned at 705-722-3555.
JS:g11
Ce.
!vir. Ian Bender, County of Simcoe
VIA FAX ONLY: 705-727-4276
l:~G\M\1t\i'lpJ..l\Cir"\Jlti.tP}" P_~~!1.:;c::\~oont~~OlJ;)\COf'!'7P'tT;hct)si\lC' J;ltVPJ~.. Emcghoc V-;u]~)'Vi1h~c.tJo.::
Est. 1960
Chris Carrier, Chair
Pred Nix, Vice-Chair
Wayne R. Wilson, c.A.O.
Our Member
Municipalities
Adjala- T osorontio Township
Amaranth Township
City of Barrie
Town of Bradford-
West Gwillimbury
Town of Collingwood
Town of The Blue Mountains
Clearview Township
Essa Township
Town ofInnisfJJ
Melancthon Township
Town of Mono
Mulmur Township
Town of New Tecumseth
Oro-Medonte Township
Municipality of Grey Highlands
Town of Shelburne
Springwater Township
Town ofWasaga Beach
Watershed Counties
County of Simcoe
County of Dufferin
County of Grey
Member Conservation Ontario
'~r Lk; ~
~. \,CQ
Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority
John Hix Conservation Administration Centr~ ~'-~. OD~--' ~~
) h::t).\\!JJ;::" ""'riTE
TiffIn Centre for Conservation 1 n ::'_YV ~;
J IO!f\F\"<1-'IP
8195 Concession 8, Utopia, Ontario LOM ITO ; MO~~IO'd -'f 1\10,:, i ') 'di
TEL (705) 424-1479, FAX (705) 424-2115 Ii! h ~I' ~~ . ~
www.nvca.on.ca f I
i 2 1 2003
~!i-
'Ii
w
May 21, 2003
Marilyn pennycook, Clerk
Township of Oro-Medonte
P.O. Box 100
ORO, Ontario
LOL 2XO
; COUNCIL b
r<- ,~.,... ~'f
~~ u. J\J. 0
J
i
I
H" ~ .~ "~"'-'~~~""":;H4"_" '~.<. ,,~.""'~~"""{~~.
Dear Ms. Pennycook,
'-.
Re: Comprehensive Development Plan
Community of Horseshoe Vallev. Township of Oro-Medonte
Thank you for providing the Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority (NVCA)
with Notice of a Public Meeting with regard to the proposed Comprehensive
Development Plan for lands in the Horseshoe Valley Village Designation, in the
Horseshoe Valley Settlement Node. As you are aware, the lands subject to the
Comprehensive Development Plan are currently located outside the NVCA's
watershed and subsequent area of jurisdiction.
As you know, it is the intent that the NVCA's area of jurisdiction will be expanded
to include the remaining part of the Township not currently governed by a
conservation authority. This expansion of jurisdiction will be ratified through a
joint Township and NVCA meeting scheduled for June 13, 2003 and will be in
effect as of September 1, 2003. The subject property would then be located
within the jurisdiction of the NVCA.
Based on the magnitude of this proposal and the property's proximity to
significant environmental features (e.g. Copeland Forest), the NVCA is willing to
assist the Township with the review of this proposal by providing technical and
environmental services in advance of September 15t. In particular, the NVCA
could assist with the review from a water resource management perspective
which we understand is a component of the Comprehensive Development Plan.
On this basis, please forward us a copy of the Comprehensive Development Plan
for our eview or contact the undersigned if you have any further comments.
Copy: Towns p of Oro-Medonte, Mayor and NVCA Member Mr. N. Craig
NVCA, Chief Administrative Officer, Mr. W. Wilson
Building Partnerships With Our Communiry to Conserve our Healtl?} Waters
Help us achieve our goals by becoming a member of the
Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Foundation
"
i~~
416
239
e!576
MAY-2e~e3 TUE ee:4!5 AM FRANK. WHITE
~
y \;
Frank J. \Vhite
18 Maple Crest
Horseshoe Valley
RR #< 1 Ba.rrie.
P.01
ee-~.
~,
::(l..
May 20, 2003
MOT!
Marilyn Pennycook. Clerk
Township of Oro-Medonte
PO Box 100
Oro, Ontario
LOL 2XO
Dear Ms Pennycook,
Re: Comprehensive Development Plan for Horseshoe Valley
As residents of Horseshoe Valley for over 25 years, we are in opposition to the changes
proposed in the "Comprehensive Development Plan".
We were originally attracted to Horseshoe Valley because ofi1S quaintness and rural
attributes. Ifwe had wanted to be in a town environment, we would have chosen Barrie
or Orillia.
Over the years, we have seen the valley grow with modest impact. However, the
comprehensive plan takes the valley out ofit8 character as a hamlet into a suburb. It is for
that, as well as other reasons, that we VE1-IJ..1ENn.. Y oppose the plan.
Yours truly,
Frank 1. White, B.A. LL.B.
() .A!l
"J
~ 1 J>o~
g(-(tI/ /-I. v. p. 0.1/.
f~) ,I
Lv) 0J t){jo3
CQ~ ~~ t..t: ~
t/\\j \'"l ( V
Horseshoe Resort Comprehensive Development Plan .
Summary of Comments from the HVPOA
Presented by Don Smith, President May 21, 2003
Positive directions:
1. Horseshoe presented to the community their plan in an open forum on March 22,
2003.
2. Issues regarding turning lanes have been addressed.
3. The initial phase to develop the Hotel along the 18th hole has been set-aside after
consideration of interior development sites.
4. Planned development has considered the character of the valley. Site utilization
has not developed the maximum amount of units.
5. Due consideration is being given to roads, water and sewage.
Future directions and concerns:
1. Country Club lane should not become a thoroughfare for construction traffic or
resort guests.
2. Development should not exceed recreational and support facility capacity of the
resort and township.
3. We should retain the valley as the center of commercial development.
t1t\'( Z 1
,. ..'
Q~)-
~~'J, ~ dl/f(J3
(O{)H~ l~~...
\ '-\.:."> S
:5 ~.O'
May 21, 2003
Members of Council
Township ofOro-Medonte
Re: The Horseshoe Resort Comprehensive Development Plan
1. We appreciate the opportunity to present our views with regard to the proposed Horseshoe Resort
Comprehensive Development Plan and wish to present the following comments for your
consideration.
2. We understand and support the value of carefully conceived development for the area; however,
we believe that full consultation is important and have identified the following as immediate
Issues.
3. We understand that all traffic for the proposed redevelopment will use the main entrance to the
resort. We are pleased that proposed enhancements to the main entrance which contemplate left
and right turn lanes will improve the safety of this intersection.
4. On reviewing the concept plan for the redevelopment, it appears that Country Club Lane will be
extended into the proposed Horseshoe Resort expansion for hotel condominium and stacked
townhouse units. W'e are adyised by Horseshoe Resort and their planning consultant that any
possible extension to Country Club Lane into the proposed redevelopment will be for emergency
purposes only.
5. We believe it is important that all alternative routes be fully considered for this purpose, and
that any potential extension of Country Club Lane for emergency use be undertaken only as
a last resort and with appropriate barricade and signage.
6. We would like this concept to be confirmed by all parties due to the significant traffic safety issues
we enVISiOn:
a) Traffic turning conflicts at Horseshoe Valley Road and Country Club Lane
b) Issues related to the grade of both Birch Grove Drive and Country Club Lane
c) Sight distance and curvature issues
7. We believe it is important that point # 5 above be explicitly confirmed within the Comprehensive
Development Plan and ultimately by the Council of Oro-Medonte.
Thank you for the opportunity to present our views on this important subject.
/")./" /
/(,.. /J.-. / A M\?~A ~
Rose Fincham
18 Country Club Lane
(705) 835-2585
9-z9I4 flr,ut<- "L/J /J,--M '
Fred and Lois Harris ~~!n & Mary Gr1't:.::" tfI({ Eii Miller
2 Country Club Lane 21 Country Club Lane 27 entry Club Lane
(705) 835-6329 (705) 835-7660 (705) 835-3072
NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING
~
FOR A PROPOSED AMENDMENT
TO THE ZONING BY.LA W
FOR THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
P-15 1103
TAKE NOTICE that the Council of the Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte will hold a Public
Meeting on Wednesday, May 21, 2003 at 7:30 p.m. in the Municipal Council Chambers. The purpose of
the public meeting is to obtain public comments on proposed amendment to the Zoning By-law, under
Section 34 of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990 c. P. 13.
THE PROPOSED Zoning By-law Amendment would rezone the lands described as Concession 5, Part
East Y2 of West Y2 Lot lO(formerly within the Township of Medonte). The subject land is proposed to be
rezoned from the Agricultural/Rural Exception 96 (AlRU*96) Zone to the Agricultural/Rural (A/RU) Zone.
The rezoning would anow a residential dwelling to be constructed on the subject property.
A KEY MAP for File P-151103 is provided below.
ANY PERSON may attend the public meeting and/or make written or verbal representation either in support
of or in opposition to the proposed Amendments. If a person or public body that files an appeal of a decision
of the Township of Oro-Medonte in respect of the proposed Amendments does not make oral submission at
the public meeting or make written submissions to the Township before the proposed Amendments are
adopted, the Ontario Municipal Board may dismiss an or part of the appeal. If you wish to be notified of the
adoption of the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment, you must make a written request to Marilyn
Pennycook, Township Clerk, at the address noted below.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION relating to the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment is available for
inspection between 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. at the Township of Oro-Medonte Administration Building, in
the Planning Department.
DA TED at the Township of Oro-Medonte this 29th day of April 2003.
Marilyn Penn ook, Clerk
Township of Oro-Medonte
P.O.. Box 100, Oro, Ontario LOL 2XO
(705)487-2171
NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING
r\
'--"
FOR A PROPOSED TEMPORARY USE BY -LAW
FOR THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
P-149/03
TAKE NOTICE that the Council of the Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte will hold a Public
Meeting on Wednesday, May 21, 2003 at 7:40 p.m. in the Municipal Council Chambers. The purpose of
the public meeting is to obtain public comments on proposed Temporary Use By-law, under Section 39 of
the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990 c. P. 13.
THE PROPOSED Temporary Use By-law would permit Motocross Events on lands within Concession 3,
West Part Lot 11(fonnerly within the Township of Oro).
A KEY MAP for File P-149/03 is provided below.
ANY PERSON may attend the public meeting andlor make written or verbal representation either in support
of or in opposition to the proposed Amendments. If a person or public body that files an appeal of a decision
of the Township of Oro-Medonte in respect of the proposed Amendments does not make oral submission at
the public meeting or make written submissions to the Township before the proposed Amendments are
adopted, the Ontario Municipal Board may dismiss all or part of the appeal. If you wish to be notified of the
adoption of the proposed Temporary Use By-law, you must make a written request to Marilyn Pennycook,
Township Clerk, at the address noted below.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION relating to the proposed Temporary Use By-law is available for
inspection between 8;30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. at the Township of Oro-Medonte Administration Building, in
the Planning Department.
DATED at the Township of Oro-Medonte this 29th day of April 2003.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING
e...
FOR THE HORSESHOE VALLEY
COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
FOR THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
TAKE NOTICE that the Council of the Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte will hold a Public
Meeting on Wednesday, May 21, 2003 at 7:50 p.m. in the Municipal Council Chambers. The purpose of
the public meeting is to obtain public comments on a proposed Comprehensive Development Plan that
would apply to lands located within the Horseshoe Valley Village designation. This meeting is considered to
be a public meeting under Section 34 of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990 c. P. 13 in accordance with section
E2.5.3.4 of the Township of Oro-Medonte Official Plan.
"
THE PROPOSED Comprehensive Development Plan would provide the basis for the consideration of
future Zoning By-law changes to pennit any of the uses contemplated in principle by the Official Plan in the
Horseshoe Valley Village designation.
A MAP showing the lands subject to the proposed Comprehensive Development Plan is below.
ANY PERSON may attend the public meeting and/or make written or verbal representation either in support
of or in opposition to the proposed Amendments. If a person or public body that files an appeal of a decision
of the Township of Oro-Medonte in respect of the proposed Amendments does not make oral submission at
the public meeting or make written submissions to the Township before the proposed Amendments are
adopted, the Ontario Municipal Board may dismiss all or part of the appeal. If you wish to be notified of the
adoption of the proposed Comprehensive Development Plan, you must make a written request to Marilyn
Pennycook, Township Clerk, at the address noted below.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION relating to the proposed Comprehensive Development Plan is available
for inspection between 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. at the Township of Oro-Medonte Administration Building, in
the Planning Department.
DA TED at the Township of Oro-Medonte this 29th day of April 2003.
I
1IOII8I8B~,.
IV
"
JIOIISISII(m ..t.UJI'f
III'n'L&dMT
ItoDI: BOUJUWn'
~~OP
~
i
r-
HORSESHOE VALLEY RESORT
COMPREHE.NSIVE DE.VELOPMENT PLAN
ENGINEERING PHASING PLAN
February 2003
Ref: 33014960..5
ENGINEERING
PLAN
Horseshoe Infrastru.cture Synopsis
Water Distribution - Zone 1
current Zone 1 water system, which serves the Horseshoe Village lands development,
consists of a wen which water to the distribution watermains and a storage standpipe.
The total equivalent population on this system after construction the planned hotel
expansion and removal of Cathedral Pines (to be connected to Zone 2) is 1487 persons.
the present pumping rate of 37.8 lis and storage facilities of 773 m3 Zone 1, there is
availability beyond Expansion for units assuming a ratio of 3.0 personslunit.
Using this scenario, the total connected population would be approximately 1700 persons.
current standpipe is a rate to
lis corresponds to MOE to Water, population is
only 1700 persons, an increase of 213 persons or 71 units beyond the planned hotel
expansion. Therefore, any new development beyond about 71 units would require more
storage capacity. This can be done by either expanding the storage capacity of the existing
standpipe, or by constructing a new reservoir. A cost benefit study should be undertaken
when an equivalent population exceeding about 1700 persons is contemplated by the Resort.
Based on our estimates, assuming full development of the Comprehensive Development
proposal, population for Zone 1 is about 5900 persons
total storage of about 3800 an increased pumping rate
assuming it is possible to increase rate to lis, total storage
requirement would only be about 2200 . As the costs to construct storage facilities are
considerably more than those to increase rates, this case would be the more
viable option. Also, it should be noted that the existing standpipe location conflicts with
proposed development and as such, it most likely be decommissioned and dismantled
replaced with a new reservoir located south of the proposed development.
assume that the new reservoirs built are sized approximately 1100 each,
would ultimately be required. One reservoir about 1100 would support a
3500 persons or 1166 With transfer proposed 1700 persons onto new
reservoir, there would be capacity for about 1800 additional persons or 600 units with a 3.0
personsl density.
Therefore
sequence Works
be as
1.
2.
3.
not
onto
5.
6. Construct proposed developments equivalent population not greater than
1800 persons or 600 units.
7. Construct 2nd 1100 m3 reservoir.
8. Construct the remaining 800 units which have an equivalent population equal to
persons so that the total equivalent population is about 5,900 persons.
It is noted that the existing watermain distribution network need to be increased either
through new pipes to service new facilities or by increasing the of existing pipes.
staging of these works would be done the detail design stage when the project
triggers the work comes online.
Water Distribution - Zone 2
Zone 2 system, which currently serves the Highlands area of the resort, reqUIre an
increase wen rate current 39 lis to 70 lis before new
takes place beyond the planned 100 units Community and Carriage
Hills, Phase 4. Once this is done, then the total system demand and the total storage
requirements for the ultimate development scenario of Zone 2 will be satisfied.
Sanitary Sewage
The current Horseshoe Village area, Carriage time-share units and Phase 1 of the Adult
Lifestyle Community; are serviced by a Sequential Batch Reactor type sewage treatment
located of Horseshoe VaHey Road. capacity Sewage
Plant is 810 committed flow being 759 the planned
Expansion, spare capacity any changes or upgrades is 51
to approximately 37 units assuming a 3.0 person/unit density. Before any future works are
realized beyond the Hotel Expansion and this additional 37 unit development, the existing
plant must be upgraded to increase the present capacity. Before this is done however, a
should be done to determine whether upgrading the present plant or building a new one would
be more cost effective. It is currently proposed by this report that beyond the 37 units referred
to above, a new sewage treatment plant should be constructed, in stages to service
development of the proposed Comprehensive Development Plan Area and other planned
development the Highlands area, disposal the plant would be
exfiltration cells (used by the current spray irrigation, snow making, conventional
infiltration techniques or spray evaporation techniques or a combination of the above
techniques.
Stormwater Management
it is not
Slight changes
can affect storm
agency
IS
. .
facilities include peak: attenuation, quality control
parameters.
ground water recharge design
A storm water management be prepared each subject site that addresses erosion,
quality, quantity, and infiltration (recharge) issues as required by the approval agencies.
stormwater management plan will include the use of enhanced drainage swales, enclosed
piped systems, wet ponds, filter strips and recharge basins. Drainage swales will be used
wherever possible throughout the site to capture runoff and convey it to the proposed central
stormwater management ponds, while providing some quality treatment and enhanced
opportunity for infiltration.
All Storm Water Management Practices (SWMPs) be designed accordance
current MOE design guidelines. cumulative effect these SWMPs shall to treat
runoff to Level 1 requirements. Sufficient attenuation would be provided on site to reduce
peak outflows associated with 2 to 100 year design storm events to their predevelopment
to ensure recharge to
system is maintained.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
HORSESHOE RESORT
Comprehensive Development Plan
Planning Analysis
February, 2003
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Table of Contents
1.0
Introduction..................................................................................................... 2
2.0
Location.......................................................................................................... 2
3.0
Proposal........................................................................................................... 2
4.0
Official Plan Criteria....................................................................................... 3
4.1 County of Simcoe Official Plan ...........................,.................................. 3
4.2 Township of Oro-Medonte Official Plan ................................................ 3
4.2.1 Permitted Uses.................................................................................... 3
4.2.2 Comprehensive Development Plan ..................................................... 4
4.2.3 Site Plan Control................................................................................. 5
4.2.4 Comprehensive Development Plan Components................................ 5
4.2.4.1 Servicing............................................................................................. 5
4.2.4.2 Phasing Plan........................................................................................ 7
4.2.4.3
4.2.4.3.1
Water Systems.................................................................................... 7
Zone 1 Water System........................................................................ 7
4.2.4.4
Sewage Systems.................................................................................. 8
4.2.4.5
Stormwater Management.................................................................... 9
4.2.4.6
Hydrogeology................................................ ..................................... 9
4.2.4.7
Design Guidelines................................,............................................ 11
4.2.4.8
Transportation................................................................................... 11
5.0
Zoning By-law.............................................................. ......................... ....... 13
6.0
............".,.........,............................................. 13
Conclusion
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1.0 Introduction
The Township ofOro-Medonte Official Plan designates the Valley Lands of the Resort as
"Horseshoe Valley Village". One of the criteria for development of this Village area is
the preparation of a Comprehensive Development Plan (CDP). This report, and its
attachments, forms the components of the CDP.
2.0 Location
Horseshoe Resort is located in Part lots 3, 4 and 5, Concession 1, former Township of
Medonte and Concessions 1,2,3 & 4 former Township ofOro. The Resort is now wholly
located within the amalgamated Township of Oro-Medonte in the County of Simcoe. The
lands subject to the Comprehensive Development Plan area located in Part Lots 3 & 4,
Concession 1 in former Medonte and Concession I in former Oro.
The CDP area comprise some 81.7 hectares (202 acres) ofland area and are essentially
located within the Valley Lands of the Resort. The Valley Lands are predominately
surrounded by ski hills. The valley is bisected trom east to west by Horseshoe Valley
Road (County Road 22). Half of the designated lands are north of Horseshoe Valley Road
and half are located south of Horseshoe Valley Road.
The north parcel is characterized by a portion of the Valley Golf Course, the associated
private ski hill and it associated buildings, and vacant lands. The south parcel hosts most
of the administrative buildings for the Resort operations, an existing time share complex,
the existing hotel, the chalet and the balance of the Valley Golf Course. There is also an
expanse of vacant lands on the south portion ofthe property.
3.0 Proposal
The CDP area is proposed to be developed with the major concentration of Resort, Resort
recreational, Resort residential, and commercial development for the Resort's entire land
holdings. Approximately 4,430 square metres (47,700 square feet) of new commercial
development is proposed with an additional 987 residential units. The residential units are
to primarily take the form of hotel units and timeshare units. The proposed geographic
breakdown is identified in the figure entitled "Land Use Context Plan" attached to the
back of this Report.
A plan showing the primary development area south of Horseshoe Valley Road is
attached at the back of this Report and is entitled "Land Use Resort Plan".
Horseshoe Resort
Comprehensive Development Plan
2
PK Menzies Planning & Development
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
4.0 Official Plan Criteria
There are two Official Plans applying to the Resort's land holdings. The first is the
County of Simcoe Official Plan (OP) and the second is the Township of Oro-Medonte
OP. The upper tier municipality designates the subject property as "Settlement Area".
The Township OP designates the lands "Horseshoe Valley Village". The applicable
policies shall be discussed herein.
4.1 County of Simcoe Official Plan
As is consistent with upper tier municipal plans, the County of Simcoe OP primarily
directs its policies towards expansion and leaves detailed policies issues to the lower tier
municipality. The relevant policies, as it relates to the Horseshoe Valley Village CDP
area are however discussed herein.
Section 3.1.1 of the County Plan directs most non-resource growth to Settlement Areas.
As identified above, the subject lands are designated a "Settlement Area" in the County
OP. The lands do not host any of the natural heritage system mapped for the County, are
not part of a wetland or high aggregate area, nor are part of the greenlands system.
The Subdivision and Development policies of Section 3.3 of the OP shall not be offended
once specific development proposals come forward for the CDP area. The developments
shall be evaluated against these policies once specific proposals are forthcoming.
The "Settlement Area" policies are found in Section 3.5 of the OP. In short, these policies
promote compact development, the efficient use ofland, water, sewer, transportation and
other services and to develop mixed-use developments. The proposal in the Valley at
Horseshoe Resort is consistent with these policies. The policies also discuss expansion
which is not applicable in the case of this proposal.
It is submitted that the policies of the County of Simcoe Official Plan can be met by the
proposal for the development of the CDP area of Horseshoe Resort.
4.2 Township of Oro-Medonte Official Plan
The Township ofOro-Medonte designates the Horseshoe Resort Valley Lands as
"Horseshoe Valley Village". The policies outline various criteria for development and
have predesignated the lands for development subject to the approval of a Comprehensive
Development Plan (CDP). The development criteria shall be examined herein.
4.2.1 Permitted Uses
The "Horseshoe Valley Village" designation is primarily for development of non-
residential type uses. Section E2.5.1.1 of the Official Plan (OP) identifies the following
permitted uses:
Horseshoe Resort
Comprehensive Development Plan
3
PK Menzies Planning & Development
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
"...retail stores, personal service shops, business offices, medical clinics, golf courses,
hotels, timeshare developments, alpine and Nordic ski areas and lodges, dining and
entertainment lounges, restaurants or snack bars, physical fitness and sports centres pro
shops and tack shops, administrative offices, conference centres and recreational
facilities. Medium density housing such as townhouses, apartments and multiple
dwellings may also be permitted provided they support the planned function of the
Horseshoe Valley Village designation. "
As identified in Section 3.0 of this Report, the focus ofthe Resort and commercial
development for the Resort area will be concentrated in the CDP area. Most of the
residential type of development shall be in the form of hotel units, condo-hotel units,
and!or timeshare units. Approximately 202 of the proposed 987 units are proposed to be
"non-commercial" townhouse units. These are identified as "Timber Ridge Townhouse
Form Unit Clusters", "Townhouse Form Unit Clusters" and "Private Ski Club Unit
Clusters" as is shown on Figure I and in Section 3.0 of this Report. The limited number
of this type of development, the development form as townhouses, as well as the
proposed townhouse development's diverse geographic locations throughout the CDP
area, is consistent with the policies to have the CDP primarily host non-traditional
residential development and the proposal also meets the planned function of the Valley
Lands area as the primary focus for commercial and recreational residential development.
The proposal therefore meets the intention of Section E2.5.3.1 ofthe Township OP as it
relates to permitted uses.
4.2.2 Comprehensive Development Plan
Sections E2.5.3.2 and E2.5.3.3 of the OP outline the requirement for provision of a
Comprehensive Development Plan and the conditions of approval of the CDP for
development ofthe lands within the Horseshoe Valley Village designation.
In effect, no new development is permitted in the Horseshoe Valley Village designation
until the CDP and a Traffic Study are prepared. The components of the CDP are as
follows (paraphrased):
. A Functional Servicing Report identifying the form of servicing,
. A Traffic Study which, among other issues as outlined in Section E2.5.1 of the
OP, is the nature, extent and timing of improvements to Horseshoe Valley Road,
. The proposed phasing of development,
. The proposed form, scale and density of development and the timing of the
residential development verses the non-residential development,
. The relationship between residential and non-residential development,
. An internal Transportation Layout! Analysis which identifies the means by which
individual uses are to be accessed,
. Urban Design Guidelines,
Horseshoe Resort
Comprehensive Development Plan
4
PK Menzies Planning & Development
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
. A Hydrogeological Analysis which outlines the impact of new development on
the groundwater recharge function in the area.
Each of these components shall be discussed herein. A full Transportation Study,
Functional Servicing Report, Hydrogeological Analysis, Concept Plan, and Urban Design
Guidelines are appended as components to this Report and form part of the
Comprehensive Development Plan.
4.2.3 Site Plan Control
Section E2.5.3.6 of the OP requires that all lands in the "Horseshoe Valley Village"
designation be subject to Site Plan Control. As each individual project comes on line, an
application will be made to the Township for Site Plan Control.
4.2.4 Comprehensive Development Plan Components
As identified in Section 4.2.2 of this Report, the CDP has various components which, in
effect, outlines a Master Plan and Servicing Strategy for the Valley Lands at the Resort.
The following reports form part of this analysis and are appended to this document:
. Functional Servicing Report - URS Cole Sherman & Associates
. Hydrogeological Analysis Terraprobe
. Design Guidelines - IBI Group
. Concept Plan - IBI Group
. Transportation Analysis - URS Cole Sherman & Associates
Each ofthese reports shall be described briefly herein. For a full reporting, please refer to
the appended documents.
4.2.4.1 Servicing
URS Cole Sherman & Associates have concluded in their Report entitled "Horseshoe
Valley Resort Comprehensive Development" dated February 2003 that the CDP area of
Horseshoe Resort can be appropriately serviced with full sewage treatment and
communal water.
With respect to water, the CDP area will be serviced by an expansion to the Zone 1 water
system. This system is currently operated by the Resort whereas the other system
servicing the Resort lands, the Zone 2 system, is operated by the Township. The Zone 1
water system will require an increase in well pump capacity as well as a new storage
reservoir. The existing standpipe is currently nearing capacity and additional storage will
have to be considered near approval of one ofthe first projects in the CDP area. Once
specifics regarding each individual development project is know in the specific, the
determination as to when these upgrades will corne on line, as well as their detailed
Horseshoe Resort
Comprehensive Development Plan
5
PK Menzies Planning & Development
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
engineering design, shall be addressed. The Phasing Plan addresses specific numbers, to
date, in this regard.
The Resort is currently partially serviced, from a sewage perspective, by an existing
Sequential Batch Reactor (SBR). This SBR is owned and operated by American Water
Systems. The Plant has an operational capacity of 810 m3/day. With the constructed and
committed developments currently being brought forward at the Resort, it is expected
that the first projects of the CDP area may be able to be accommodated on the existing
plant facility however, calculations related to the specifics of these first developments,
associated with the ongoing monitoring of the SBR, will confirm this. Additional sewage
solutions will be required to service the ultimate build-out of the CDP area.
Approximately 37 units of additional available capacity have been identified in the
Phasing Plan.
Sewage flows from additional development in the Valley Lands will be pre-treated
though a sewage plant facility and the effluent shall be disposed of exclusively or by a
combination of the following methods:
. exfiltration cells
. spray irrigation
. snow making
. conventional infiltration
. spray evaporation
The exact method of disposal shall be further studied and designed in cooperation with
the Township and the Ministry of the Environment before a Certificate of Approval will
be issued. This study will be undertaken once details ofthe individual projects which
trigger the works are specifically known.
It is anticipated that Holding Zones on each individual project site shall be implemented
until such time as specifics regarding supply of water and sewage are determined on an
individual site basis.
It is intended that the CDP area ofthe Resort shall be serviced though numerous
stormwater management facilities which will control flows as well as control quality
though the use of Best Management Practices. There will be a balance struck between the
number of facilities/methods of controlling storm water and the goal of providing
infiltration at source as much as possible. This will be achieved though a series of ponds,
open swales and piped systems. Some of the ponds may also act as amenity features as is
being proposed at the 18th fairway of the Valley Golf Course as part of the Resort's
proposed hotel expansion.
Generalized pond locations have been contemplated at the low gradient areas of the
Resort in order to maintain landform conservation however, details regarding exact
locations and design shall be determined once details of each individual project are
known. The design of these ponds/systems shall be a condition of Site Plan Approval.
Horseshoe Resort
Comprehensive Development Plan
6
PK Menzies Planning & Development
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
4.2.4.2 Phasing Plan
A Phasing Plan fonus part of the Comprehensive Development Plan and is provided
under separate cover. The Phasing Plan outlines the required engineering works and
upgrades and the generalized timing for implementation of these upgrades. The Plan is
broken down into Water Systems, Sewage Systems and Stonuwater Management. For
specific details regarding the Phasing Plan, please refer to the original document.
4.2.4.3 Water Systems
There are two water systems currently operating at the Resort. The Zone 1 water system
is owned and operated by the Resort; the Zone 2 water system is owned and operated by
the Township which only services Carriages Hills Phases 1 to 4. This Report shall
therefore only discuss the Zone 1 water system
4.2.4.3.1
Zone 1 Water System
The Cathedral Pines subdivision is currently connected to the Zone 1 system. This has
been identified by the Resort as more properly being connected to the Township's Zone 2
system. Once this has been accomplished, the Zone I system, after the Hotel expansion,
shall have a pumping and storage expansion capacity as follows:
213 people or 71 units (approximately).
The above assumes that the pump capacity is maintained at 37.8 1/s and a population
count of 3.0 persons per unit (ppu). The limiting factor for expansion of the existing
water system is reservoir storage capacity.
The storage capacity can be increased by either increasing the existing standpipe capacity
or by constructing a new reservoir.
The current storage capacity of the existing standpipe is 773 m3. The full buildout of the
CDP area would require a storage capacity of about 3800 m3 or 5 times the existing
capacity. This is based on a pump rate of64.41/s. If the pump rate is increased to 100 1/s,
the total storage requirement would be about 2200 m3 or about 3 times the existing
standpipe capacity.
The existing standpipe is located in an area where development is located and therefore it
will likely be decommissioned and replaced.
The intended storage solution is to provide for two reservoirs of a size similar to that
currently located near Carriage Hills Phase 1.
Therefore the sequence of works for water would be as follows:
Horseshoe Resort
Comprehensive Development Plan
7
PK Menzies Planning & Development
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1. Construct the Hotel Expansion.
2. Construct any project with an equivalent population not greater than 213
persons or 71 units (approximately).
3. Build a new reservoir with a capacity of 1100 m3.
4. Transfer the units in Zone 1 which are serviced by the existing 773 m3
standpipe onto the new 1100 m3 standpipe.
5. Demolish the old 773 m3 standpipe.
6. Construct proposed developments with equivalent population not greater than
about 1800 persons or 600 units.
7. Construct 2nd 1100 m3 reservoir.
8. Construct the remaining 800 units which have an equivalent population equal
to 2400 persons so that the total equivalent population is about 5,900 persons.
It is noted that the existing watermain distribution network will need to be increased
either through new pipes to service new facilities or by increasing the size of existing
pipes. The staging of these works would be done in the detail design stage when the
project which triggers the work comes online.
4.2.4.4 Sewage Systems
The current Horseshoe Village area, the Carriage Hill time-share units, and Phase 1 of the
Adult Lifestyle Community (Laural View subdivision); are serviced by a Sequential
Batch Reactor (SBR) type sewage treatment plant located north of Horseshoe Valley
Road. The existing capacity of this Sanitary Sewage Treatment Plant is 810 m3.
After the Hotel expansion, the remaining capacity in the SBR is approximately 37 units
(based on 3.0 ppu).
Any additional development beyond phase 1 of Laural View (100 units), Carriage Hills
IV, the Hotel expansion, and the additional 37 units noted above, the existing plant must
be upgraded. Before this is done however, a study should be done to determine whether
upgrading the present plant or building a new one would be more cost effective. The
Resort's engineers have identified to the Township that a new sewage treatment plant be
constructed, in stages, to service the CDP area and other committed development in the
Highlands area, including future phases of Laural View.
Once the plant is completed, the effluent from the plant is required to be disposed of. The
current SBR disposes of this effluent though infiltration lagoons into the Copeland
Forest, north of the Plant. Alternative methods of disposal of effluent from the plant
would be either exfiltration cells (used by the current plant), spray irrigation, snow
making, conventional infiltration techniques or spray evaporation techniques or a
combination of the above techniques.
Horseshoe Resort
Comprehensive Development Plan
8
PK Menzies Planning & Development
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
4.2.4.5 Stormwater Management
This matter cannot be addressed in any detail at this time as there are no specific projects,
other than the Hotel expansion, contemplated for the CDP area. The Hotel will host its
own stormwater management facility as a water feature on the 18th fairway in front of the
expansion area. Slight changes in grades, form of ground cover, and project location will
greatly effect the various stormwater solutions and thus details cannot be provided at this
time.
The theory behind the stormwater solution(s) is to balance the need for stormwater ponds
for both quality and quantity stormwater flow against the need to infiltrate as much water
at source as possible. Quality and quantity control will be determined on a project by
project basis and meet all of the regulatory requirements.
4.2.4.6 Hydrogeology
Terraprobe Limited was retained to address the hydrogeological component parts ofthe
Comprehensive Development Plan as well as assess the sewage capability, from a
hydrogeological perspective, for the CDP area and beyond. As the study of hydrogeology
is not static geographically, Terraprobe reviewed the geographic area beyond the CDP
boundaries in both analysis.
Terraprobe has determined the following from their analysis:
1. The existing upper to intermediate groundwater aquifer system below Horseshoe
Valley Resort will be suitable to sustain the proposed future development.
2. The proposed new development will need to be serviced with a new sewage
treatment plant and likely a combination of various sewage effluent disposal
options which will include further exfiltration cells, spray irrigation, enhanced
evaporation technologies, snow making using treated effluent, and more
traditional effluent infiltration techniques.
3. The combination of state-of-the-art effluent treatment and innovative combined
disposal options will ensure that an acceptable impact of the environment will
occur.
4. Integration of Best Management Stormwater Management Practices to maintain
or enhance current infiltration of stormwater will aid and ensure that there is
minimal impact to the shallow groundwater table.
5. It is anticipated that the use of spray irrigation technology and some snow making
using treated effluent will substantially reduce the current permitted requirement
for taking groundwater for these purposes which will help offset requirements for
new water taking for the proposed developments.
Horseshoe Resort
Comprehensive Development Plan
9
PK Menzies Planning & Development
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
6. The proposed water taking requirements and ultimately the treatment of effluent
is anticipated to be approximately 2.6 times what the current development uses.
7. The hydrogeology for the Horseshoe Valley Settlement Node indicates that there
is a shallow groundwater table that flows northward from beneath the upper
highland area and discharges as shallow surface water into the Copeland Forest.
Only a small section around the west edge of Carriage Hills Resort Phase 4 has
shallow intermittent flow northwestward into the Matheson Creek Watershed.
8. The upper and intermediate aquifers that are the major groundwater aquifers
beneath the moraine also flow northward with discharge into the Coldwater River
several kilometres north of Horseshoe Valley Resort but are anticipated to provide
some discharge up into the Copeland Forest.
9. State-of-the-art technologies will be reviewed and assessed with respect to
treatment of the effluent to ensure that it can be adequately either exfiltrated,
spray irrigated, used for snow making or infiltrated on the subject property to
meet health concerns and minimize impact with respect to surface and
groundwater.
10. The cumulative groundwater and sewage disposal requirements for the Horseshoe
Valley Settlement Node area, which includes the Comprehensive Development
Plan area which is subject of this Report, can be accommodated using a
combination of disposal options. The options used and the triggers for
requirements for improvement to the infrastructure will be tied in directly with the
phasing or staging of the developments and may be contingent ultimately on
monitoring of both use and impact as the developments proceed. This type of
approach is beneficial in that it allows for appropriate changes in the
infrastructure to make it financially viable as well as suitably minimize the impact
to the environment using the most advanced technologies. (Source: Terraprobe
Report dated February 26, 2003 Section 1, Executive Summary)
Terraprobe has concluded that the pre-treated effluent can be properly disposed ofthough
several methods, including but not limited to, exfiltration and spray irrigation. Additional
possible methods of disposal are outlined in Section 4.3.1 of this Report. If spray
irrigation is used on the golf course and/or ski hills, then the Resort can potentially reduce
its requirement for water taking as the treated effluent shall take the place of groundwater
irrigation. The spray irrigation effluent shall meet MOE criteria.
Though use of Best Management Practices, the groundwater regime shall be
appropriately protected.
Horseshoe Resort
Comprehensive Development Plan
10
PK Menzies Planning & Development
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
4.2.4.7 Design Guidelines
IBI Group was undertook the production of Design Guidelines for the CDP area entitled
"Horseshoe Resort CDP Design Report" dated March, 2003. This Report outlines the
design criteria for development in the CDP area.
The Report outlines the following design principals:
. enhance and reinforce the core centre of activity south of Horseshoe Valley Road;
. create an environment that enhances and encourages pedestrian improvements;
. develop and improve non private vehicle and pedestrian connections between the
CDP area and the Highlands by implementing:
improved pedestrian routes
provision of shuttle services
upgrading and expansion of ski lifts
useful for winter and summer people movers and,
measures to reduce the reliance on private vehicles through Resort stay;
. Mixed use development in the CDP area south of Horseshoe Valley Road including
retail, hotel/condo, food/beverage, commercial, and timeshare residential facilities.
These uses will add to community vitality;
. Lower scale and density is proposed north of Horseshoe Valley Road to blend with
and maintain the less "action" based activities and to maintain natural features of
woodlots, topography and water courses;
. Create buildings that are sensitive to the character and scale (2-3 storeys) residential
clusters (North of Horseshoe Valley Road) which maintain relationships with natural
land and vegetation features.
These principals will form the basis for all future development in the Comprehensive
Development Plan Area.
The theme and style of development will respect the traditional Ontario Resort form of
development keeping the massing a low scale and being respectful to issues of landform
conservation. For specific design criteria including built form, site characteristics, and
parking, please refer directly to the IBI Report.
4.2.4.8 Transportation
In June 2000 URS Cole Sherman & Associates, on behalf of Horseshoe Resort,
undertook a comprehensive analysis ofthe Transportation related to the Resort's
landholdings, and beyond. This Report analyzed the transportation infrastructure that may
Horseshoe Resort
Comprehensive Development Plan
11
PK Menzies Planning & Development
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
be required upon full buildout of the Horseshoe Resort Settlement Node. This area
included the Comprehensive Development Plan area which is subject to this Report.
The Transportation Analysis recommended various boundary road changes which
included widenings, turn lanes, signalization of the Resort Entrance at Country Road 22
(Horseshoe Valley Road) among other recommendations. These recommendations were
embodied in the Township's Official Plan in Section E2.5.1.
The Report was prefaced on various forms and types of development occurring in various
geographic areas of the Resort's landholdings. The Report then identified the type of road
improvements required, and the timing of those improvements as it related to unit yields.
At the time of authoring the original Transportation Analysis, the CDP area contemplated
more commercial development and less residential/hotel type development that is being
proposed today. As such, URS Cole Sherman was asked to reevaluate their original
report in the context of the specific developments proposed for the Valley Lands. It
should be noted that changes also occurred outside of the CUP area, most notably a down
designation of a medium density residential site located on Highland Drive wherein 300
townhouse units were designated for development and the Resort requested, and was
approved, for the development of 13 large single unit lots. This information was also
accounted for in the updated Transportation Analysis.
The original Analysis required various road improvements at the Resort Entrance with
County Road 22 should development proceed in the Valley (and other) areas. No other
road improvements were required in other geographic areas by virtue of development in
the Valley; that is improvements at the Third and Fourth Lines were attributable to
development proposals outside of the Valley Land areas.
The updated Transportation Analysis, dated January 2003, identified the need for the
same type of improvements at the Resort Entrance as in the original Report namely:
· Signalized traffic control;
· Exclusive eastbound right turn lane;
· Exclusive eastbound and westbound left turn lanes;
· Exclusive northbound and southbound left turn lanes;
The Report goes on to recommend that the above noted works would be required at the
time of certain triggers namely the number of units constructed in the Valley Land area.
For example, the exclusive eastbound turn lane would be required to be constructed (or
financially secured) when 55 additional units, or more, were constructed in the Highlands
area of the Resort (outside ofthe CDP area). Notwithstanding that the form of road
improvements in the updated Study remain unchanged from the previous Study
conducted in 2000, the updated Study concluded that the staging or timing of the road
improvements has diminished from the 2000 Report requirements.
Horseshoe Resort
Comprehensive Development Plan
12
PK Menzies Planning & Development
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Despite the two completed Transportation Reports and the clear policies of the
Township's Official Plan regarding the type and staggered timing of road improvements
at the Resort's entrance at County Road 22, the Resort has decided to enter into an
agreement with the County of Simcoe which, in effect, would require the construction, or
financial securing of all of the road improvements at the Resort entrance (save and except
signalization) as a condition of approval of the first development in the CDP area. The
road improvements would then not occur in an incremental basis based on future
approved units but would occur all at once. This "trigger" development is the expansion
to the Resort's Hotel.
It was determined by the County that signalization was not particularly desired at the
Resort entrance, at this time, due to the topography of the road and the lack of warrants
for the work. The Agreement nonetheless does require that the underground infrastructure
for construction of signalization be installed at the time that the road works are completed
should future signalization of the intersection be warranted.
The updated study from URS Cole Sherman forms part of the CDP submission package.
5.0 Zoning By-law
The Valley Lands which comprise the Comprehensive Development Plan area are zoned
in various site specific "Future Development" zone categories for example FD*67 and
FD*69. These categories, in effect, contemplate "future development" and permit only
the existing development to be recognized as legal and conforming to the By-law.
Generally minor expansions can also be accommodated within these FD zones. Except
for the areas of the existing ski hills and golf course therefore, which are zoned "Private
Recreational- PR", rezonings are required for any additional substantive development to
occur.
Each successive site, or combination of sites, which is proposed for development, shall
then proceed to the rezoning process and utilize the CDP as its guide for approvals much
the same as a Master Plan would be utilized.
6.0 Conclusion
Although the development and approval of the Comprehensive Development Plan does
not form an approval under the Planning Act, the preparation of the CDP provides the
Resort, the Public, and the Township the understanding of the form of development
which the Resort is planning to undertake in the future. The CDP will be the
"framework" or "master plan" for future development.
The policies of the Township's Official Plan require the holding of two public meetings,
under Section 34 of the Planning Act (the rezoning section). It is contemplated that the
Horseshoe Resort
Comprehensive Development Plan
13
PK Menzies Planning & Development
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
first meeting will relate to the CDP and any subsequent public meetings will relate
specifically to a particular site's rezoning. It is anticipated that the Township will have
regard to the CDP when reviewing any future rezoning and development applications
such as applications for Plans of Condominium or Site Plan.
The CDP (Valley Lands) do not require an amendment to the Official Plan for Council to
properly consider rezoning of the lands for site specific developments.
The component parts of the CDP have clearly demonstrated that the site can be properly
serviced, that the proposal is in keeping with the approved Transportation Analysis for
the area, and that the recharge function for the site will not be compromised. The form of
development, the Concept Plan, and the Design Guidelines are all in keeping with good
planning for the area.
It is submitted that the Conditions of Approval as required in Section E2.5.3.3 of the
Township's Official Plan can be met in that the scale and form of development on the
lands conforms to the objectives of the Plan, the servicing is appropriate, the
improvements to the boundary road network has been previously approved by the
Township and has been confirmed though this exercise, and that the phasing is
appropriate given the timing of installation of services and improvement to Horseshoe
Valley Road.
It is requested that the CDP proceed to a public meeting and a resolution from Council be
considered for approval of the CDP as presented.
Kris Menzies, MCIP RPP
Horseshoe Resort
Comprehensive Development Plan
14
PK Menzies Planning & Development
-------------------
X-C SKI
CHALET
NORTHWEST
LANDS
50 LOTS TOWNHO
UNIT CLU
X-C CHAL
TIMBER RIDGE
TOWNHOUSE FORM
UNIT CLUSTERS
SIMCOE
CONDOMINIUM
MAPLECREST
SUBDIVISION
55 UNlTS
50 LOTS
TIMBER RIDGE
250 UNITS PROPOSED
72 UNlTS
30 UNlTS
HILLSIDE
47 UNlTS
I
CONFERENCE I
CENTRE '
48 UNITS
BIRCH GROVEl
COUNTRY CLUB
102 SUITES
EXISTING DAY
LODGE
EXISTING TIME
SHARE
40 UNIT5
RECREA TION
CENTRE
HOTEL CONDO
75 UNITS
CARRIAGE HILLS
RESORT - IV
78 UNlTS
EXISTING SEWER
EASEMENT
HIGHLANDS
SUBDIVISION
PHASE I
59 LOTS
CARRIAGE HILLS
RESORT - I, II, III
52 UNlTS,52 UNlTS,58 UNITS = 172 UNlTS
HIGHLANDS
SUBDIVISION
PHASE IV
192 LOTS
PHASE 1, 55 LOTS
I,
Ii
II
II
\
II
il
'I
HORSESHOE VALLEY
RESORT
CONCEPT PLAN
Land Use
CONTEXT PLAN
~
FEBRUARY 2003
-------------------
CHALET
T~NHOUSE
UI~ CLUSTER
BIDE X-C CH
3
I
..
SIMCOE
CONDOMINIUM
65 UNITS
102 SUITES
POTENTIAL
SKI HILL
EXPANSION
HORSESHOE VALLEY
RESORT
CONCEPT PLAN
////~~=~~=~//(/II
((//~~PLECRE~;I II
SUBDIVISIO~ !
II 50 LOTS II
ill i
Iii
II 1 i
II
II
! i
BIRCH GROVEl
COUNTRY CLUB
47 UNITS
RECREATION
AREA
Land Use
RESORT PLAN
~
FEBRUARY 2003
~
,
,
,
,
,
\
\
,
,
,
HORSESHOE RESOR'1'
COMPREHENSIVE DE~ELOPMEN'1' PLA'N
(CDP)
DESIGN REPOR'1'
PROJECT #1'0-354
IBl
GROlJP
I
I
I,
I.
I
f
I
I
I
I
1/
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1 INTRODUCTION
2 HORSESHOE MASTER PIAN-
2.1 Project Scope
2.1.1 Development
2.2 Components
2.2.1 Lands South of Horseshoe Valley Road
2.2.2 North of Horseshoe Valley
2.3 Development
2.3.1 'Principles' Statement
Project Phasing
2.3.2
2.3.3 Project Phasing
3 FORM OF DEVELOPMENT
3.1 Theme and
3.2 Built Form and Massing
3.3 Linkages
3.4 Other Considerations
3.4.1 Green Building
3.4.2 Drainage
3.4.3 Grading
3.4.4 Parking
3.5 Design Guideline Implementation
3.6 Relation to Existing Planning Approvals
4 summary
3
12
12
12
14
15
IBI
GROUP
I
I
I
(
I
t
I
I
f
I
J
I
i
J
[
(
I
~
[
The Oro-Medonte Official Plan designates a large portion of the land holdings of
Horseshoe Resort as "Horseshoe Valley Resort Node". The V alley Lands at the
Resort, where the majority of commercial and recreational development is located,
is further designated "Horseshoe Valley Village". This Village designation is
subject to the approval of a Comprehensive Development Plan (CDP) prior to any
substantive development proceeding in the valley. The area subject to the
Comprehensive Development Plan is approximately 202 acres (81.7Ha) in' area.
The specific lands subject to the CDP, Site within an overall context of existing and
proposed development. As such, planning development strategies are affected by
this contextual setting.
The purpose of this report is to satisfy one of the development criteria of the CDP
being the production of Design Guidelines.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
r
I
I
r
I
The intent of the Comprehensive Development Plan is to clarify a VISIOn for the
development and integration of the Horseshoe Valley Village lands into a vibrant and
expanding development context.
The vision includes the potential expansion of activities such as downhill ski, golf, cross-
country ski, hiking and biking; as well as expansion of guest accommodations and
amenities resulting in a comprehensive four-season recreation resort through a 10-15 year
implementation program.
This vision will unfold through environmentally responsible and leading edge
developments and will include techniques, which will ensure the preservation of the
natural resources of Horseshoe Valley.
In addition to the existing
development, Horseshoe
Valley Village will have a
number of development
parcels that are different in
scale, function and character.
Potential lands for
redevelopment fit within two
development zones:
1. The existing valley
lands south of
Horseshoe Valley
Road;
The valley lands north
of Horseshoe Valley
Road.
Northlands
The hills and valley lands north of Horseshoe Valley Road are presently occupied' by a
private ski club known as the Heights of Horseshoe, part of the 18-hole valley golf course,
cross-country ski club, and hiking/biking trails all are located within a context of natural
landscape and wooded areas.
Established single unit
subdivisions form a
perimeter east and north
of the COP area which,
nevertheless, influence
the tone of proposed
development.
NORTH LANDS
The activities north of
Horseshoe Valley Road
area found to be lower
key and predominantly
nature related as
compared to the "action"
oriented activities south
of Horseshoe Valley
Road.
.;.!.,. '.' a...., alai.
SOUTH LANDS
The northern portion of
the COP area is intended
to integrate with the
existing fabric and
natural land uses and
generally be lower key
and less dense than the
proposed development in
the southern portion of
the COP area.
I
t
I
I
t
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
For the purposes of preparing the master plan concept, three fundamental building configurations have been
utilized as follows:
(a)
Three to five storey, double loaded corridor arrangement constructed in non-combustible materials.
This building typology will incorporate a mix of uses with potential non residential development at
grade. The buildings will be articulated to create a vibrant public edge and help to define the "action
centre" of the village core.
(b)
Two to three storey wood frame buildings similar to the existing Carriage Hills prototype will be
utilized in the development to the more passive areas within the valley.
Two to three storey townhouse configuration. This typology will be developed for the development of
smaller clusters of housing north of the Village core and North of Horseshoe Valley Road. These
clusters will be designed to take advantage of the varying terrain of the area and to nestle the
development into the natural environment.
(d) One and Two storey commercial/recreational building types. In order to promote additional retail and
recreational development opportunities, some free standing buildings will be required withinthe CDP
area. These buildings should reflect the theme of the proposed Horseshoe Development, incorporating
rural architectural detailing and built form. These buildings should be oriented to help define the
public realm and to enhance the resort environment. This building type may be utilized near the
entrance of the Resort to define the entrance to the Horseshoe Resort. Recreational uses also require
free standing buildings with large spans for interior uses and these buildings should be designed to
create a positive edge along the public realm.
The use of a variety of building types, enhances ability to respond to varying geographic and topographic
conditions appropriately while at the same time adding variety to the overall buildout.
The following design principles are applicable to all scales of
buildings:
· Vary building facades to avoid monochromatic massing by use
of architectural elements such as balconies, dormers, steps.
. Create distinctive sloped hipped, gabled and dormered roof
lines;
· Employ stone or masonry elements at base of buildings to
provide unifying elements at base, streetscape and pedestrian
wa y details;
· Utilize wood type siding, stucco or brick on the principle
fas;ades of buildings;
. Utilize roofscape elements such as cupolas and chimneys to
contain and minimize mechanical roof penetrations and to add
roofscape variety;
· Create buildings that complement and integrate the distinctive
Horseshoe look that is established for the urban design elements
of the Resort;
· Create a sympathetic interaction between developments and the
street as all buildings fronting on streets, plazas and pedestrian
routing are integral to the public environment;
· Design continuity of pedestrian open spaces utilizing unified
paving, street elements and plantings;
· Employ native materials and plantings wherever possible.
Fundamental to the master plan concept is the improvement to existing and creation of new linkages bet~een
the Highlands and the valley.
The future expansion of ski runs wrapping the south portion of the valley bowl offers the opportunity to
improve connections four seasons transportation between the valley and the Highlands offering ski-infski-out
connections to Carriage Hills in the winter and improvements to summer pedestrian connections.
Walking trails, mountain biking paths and x-country ski circuits should be designed to
movement throughout the valley and to the plateau above.
In addition, enhancement
of the walking trails
connection and
development of a new
service road connection
will facilitate ease of
access and reduce
reliance on pri vate
vehicles for guests to
travel between resort
facilities.
NORTH LANDS
al.I.I.I.I.I.I.l1
HORSESHOE .,.,.,.,.,
VALLEY ROAD
(HVR)
r
Pedestrian paths
throughout the CDP Area
and within the village
should be well lit and
designed for snow
removal operations.
They should be designed
to take advantage of local
views and to be both
scenic and direct so that
they will be utilized as
much as possible.
Within the village core,
the public buildings
should be encouraged to
provide sheltered areas
for pedestrians and
weather and show slide
protection where
warranted.
4'
SOUTH LANDS
Green Building design will, wherever possible, be encouraged and designs
should reflect efforts to conserve energy/water and reflect environmentally
conservative design decisions;
The process of site development should follow green design principles
involving three basic systems:
. Habitat and vegetation, hydrological systems;
. Sun/shade, wind/temperature.
. Site development within natural topography;
. Utilization of native plant and landscape materials;
Building orientations. Design all buildings to optimize views, privacy,
sun and other site opportunities, respecting the natural topography of
the land and the existing vegetation;
The overall stormwater management concept is explained in the URS Cole
Sherman report under separate cover. The following outlines basic
principles of the approach from a design perspective:
Site Drainage
Run-off from impervious surfaces such as roofs and paved areas
should be collected and directed to drains;
Stormwater storage will be required. Storage ponds will be
strategically located on the site and will be naturalized to the extent
possible to support plant and wildlife habitat. Decorative water
features such as fountains or ponds will be separate from storm water
storage,
Interceptors may be required on drains from parking areas and other
areas where grease, oil, gasoline, etc. can contaminate stormwater run-
off.
Grading requirements of a development must be resolved within the
property boundary.
Cuts and fills should be minimized and blended into the existing terrain.
Generally, retaining walls should be less than five feet high. In cases
where a retaining wall exceeds five feet, it should be stepped and
landscaped. Timber retaining walls are generally discouraged. Rock
stack, terraced, stone faced, or battered retaining walls are required.
Slopes of cut and fill blanks should be determined by soil characteristics
for the specific site to avoid erosion and promote revegetation
opportunities. Maximum allowable slope is 2:1 (3:1 grass).
Existing day guest parking lots will remain in operation until such
time as development is implemented on the site. When required,
alternative accommodation for day guest parking will be provided
either:
on an alternative site, possibly with provision for suitable
transport;
within the planned site development as structured parking.
The building configuration proposed for a development site will
determine whether surface or underground parking is appropriate.
In addition to day guest parking discussed above, where non
combustible built form is proposed, ie. 3-5 storeys in hotel
configuration, and where feasible, underground and or structured
parking should be provided, particularly in or near the resort core.
Surface parking lots should be designed to be screened with building
form or landscaped berms. Any new parking areas should be
encouraged to be linear in nature and broken into smaller areas
broken up by landscape features. These landscaped areas should be
designed to serve as snow storage areas in the winter months so as not
to significantly reduce the capacity of the lots
For security purposes, surface lots in close proximity to the village
core should be well lit. Pedestrian connections from the core to these
lots should be clearly identified, designed to be easily maintained and
well lit.
Large lots should also be designed to incorporate snow storage to
avoid unnecessary reduction of capacity during the winter months.
It is understood that each phase of implementation will be subject to site
specific review proposed development design and technical design
including:
· Architectural Design
. Landscape Design
. Grading/Drainage
. Site Servicing
. Parking and Loading
Evaluated within the context of the Comprehensive Development Plan
The improvement staging in the Township of Oro-Medonte's Official
Plan is consistent with the derived phasing requirements in this traffic
review. The only exception is for the provision of the westbound left turn
lane at the County Road 22 / Horseshoe Valley Resort entrance. The
staging in the Official Plan is more rigorous than that determined in this
study (i.e. required at 250 units instead of the derived 300 units), which is
now based on a slightly reduced development yield for the Horseshoe
Valley Settlement Node lands. Thus, adherence to the staging scenario
identified in the Official Plan would result in transportation infrastructure
in advance of the actual calculated need and thereby improved network
operations.
In fact, the above referenced Agreement between the Resort and the
County of Simcoe ensures that the provision of the intersection
improvements at the Resort entrance are undertaken or financially secured
prior to final approvals being given to the development of the proposed
76-suite hotel expansion in the Horseshoe Valley Village.
Since the development scale is reduced from that which was previously
modeled and also since the Resort is not pursuing a change to the
identified intersection improvements (or staging), an updated
comprehensive traffic assessment report is not required.
In summary, our review addresses the following main items and/or
conclusions.
I. The existing upper to intermediate groundwater aquifer system
below Horseshoe Valley Resort will be suitable to sustain the
proposed future development.
2. The proposed new development will need to be serviced with a
new sewage treatment plant and likely a combination of various
sewage effluent disposal options which will include further
exfiltration cells, spray irrigation, enhanced evaporation
technologies, snow making using treated effluent, and more
traditional effluent infiltration techniques. The combination of
state-of-the-art effluent treatment and innovative combined
disposal options will ensure that an acceptable impact of the
environment will occur.
3. Integration of Best Management Stormwater Management
Practices to maintain or enhance current infiltration of stormwater
will aid and ensure that there is minimal impact to the shallow
groundwater table.
4. It is anticipated that the use of spray irrigation technology and
some snow making using treated effluent will substantially reduce
the current permitted requirement for taking groundwater for
these purposes which will help offset requirements for new water
taking for the proposed developments.
5. The proposed water taking requirements and ultimately the
treatment of effluent is anticipated to be approximately 2.6 times
what the current development uses.
6. The hydrogeology for the Horseshoe Valley Settlement Node
indicates that there is a shallow groundwater table that flows
northward from beneath the upper highland area and discharges
as shallow surface water into the Copeland Forest.
7. The upper and intermediate aquifers that are the major
groundwater aquifers beneath the moraine also flow northward
with discharge into the Coldwater River several kilometres north
of Horseshoe Valley Resort but are anticipated to provide some
discharge up into the Copeland Forest.
8. State-of-the-art technologies will be reviewed and assessed with
respect to treatment of the effluent to ensure that it can be
adequately either exfiltrated, spray irrigated, used for snow
making or infiltrated on the subject property to meet health
concerns and minimize impact with respect to surface and
groundwater.
9, The cumulative groundwater and sewage disposal requirements
for the Horseshoe Valley Settlement Node area can be
accommodated using a combination of disposal options. The
options used and the triggers for requirements for improvement to
the infrastructure will be tied in directly with the phasing or
staging of the developments and may be contingent ultimately on
monitoring of both use and impact as the developments proceed.
This type of approach is beneficial in that it allows for appropriate
changes in the infrastructure to make it financially viable as well
as suitably minimize the impact to the environment using the
most advanced technologies.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ES EY
COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPME
PLAN
FUN 10
NG
February 2003
Ref: 33014960-5
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Hi. OJ ..Ri....;S...E...Sr..iH... i.Or....E. V", /A.i.\.L: l'.Em:.Y/ R.....;E'.S.....Oi...R'.......)Tmm
('-..'!' ,f f '" -"'.) to._,,", 'P, ) I-H" : -: ,j t """, . j'M : . 'i, t..,.;:,! r -',--'-'-"""', - -'- )." j_
m ... ......... ..... ..........i m...... .....i.. ...> ... ...../..m...J.i .... ...... .....m.. ...... ...i.i ...... ....m..........'.......... .m.. ...... .i
COMIPRE,HENIS,IVE D,EVELOPMIENT P'LAN
FUNCTIONAL S.ERVIC'INGi REPO.RT
URS Cole, Sherman & Associates Ltd.
75 Commerce Valley Drive East
Thornhill, Ontario, Canada L3T 7N9
Tel: 905.882.4401
Fax: 905.882.4399
February 2003
Ref: 33014960-5
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION........... ...... .......... a............ ... ............................ ........ 1
1.1 Purpose.. . .. .. . . .. .... . . ..... . . .. .. . ........ .. .. . .. .. .. . . ... ... . . .. .... ....... . ... .. ... .. . . . . . .... . . ..1
2.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION ........................................................1
2.1 Site Description ...................................................................................1
2.2 Proposed Development............. .............................. .............................1
2.2.1 Development Parcels.............. .... ...................... .............................1
2.2.2 Components..................................................................................2
2.3 Development Principles .... ..................................... ...............................3
2.4 Project Phasi ng .................................................................................... 3
2.5 General Engineering Criteria.................................................................3
3.0 WATER SU PPL Y ................... ........ a... ..... ....................... ............ ........ 3
3.1 General.............. .................... ........ ...................... ...............................3
3.1.1 Existing Facilities Zone 1 ................................................................4
3.1.2 Existing Facilities Zone 2................................................................5
3.2 Design Population ............. ........... ........................................................5
3.3 Water System Expansion - Zone 1........................................................5
3.4 Water System Expansion - Zone 2........................................................6
4.0 SANITARY SEWER SERVICING ........................................................ 6
4.1 General............................................................................................... 6
4.2 Sanitary Sewage Capacity...... ....... ..... ... ..... ............... ....... ... ..... ..... .... ....6
4.3 Sa n ita ry Sewage Flows......................................................................... 7
4.4 Sewage Effluent Disposal... ....... ............................................... ............ 7
5.0 GRADING AND DRAINAGE ..............................................................7
6.0 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN ............................................... 8
6.1 Area 1 - Hotel Expansion ......................................................................9
6.2 Area 2 - South Expansion .....................................................................9
6.3 Area 3 - North Expansion................................................................ ..... 9
6.4 Area 4 - Timber Ridge. ....... .......... ........................................... ............. 9
6.5 Stormwater Management Summary ....................................................10
7 .0 TRANSPORTATION ... ..a. a............ .... ........................ ................ .... .... 10
8.0 CONCLUSIONS..................... ..... .... ......................... ........................ 10
Figure 2-1
Figure 2-2
Figure 3-1
Figure 3-2
Figure 4-1
Figure 6-1
LIST OF FIGURES
General Location
Comprehensive Development Plan
Zone 1 Watermain Layout
Zone 2 Watermain Layout
Sanitary Sewers - External Service
Conceptual Stormwater Management Plan
N:\Landdev\2002PR0J\33014960\Comprehensive Plan\Comp. Plan (FebI8.2003).doc -1-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
HORSESHOE VALLEY RESORT
COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
FUNCTIONAL SERVICING REPORT
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Purpose
Designated under the Oro-Medonte Official Plan as "Horseshoe Valley Village", the Valley
Lands of Horseshoe Resort are located within the Horseshoe Valley Resort Node. The Township
Official Plan requires the development of a Comprehensive Development Plan prior to any
rezoning being considered in the Valley Land area of the Resort. The Comprehensive
Development Plan (CDP) will outline in general tenns the visions for future development within
the Horseshoe Valley Village Node and the corresponding phasing. This Functional Serving
Report (FSR) (preliminary engineering) along with the P.K. Menzies Planning Report, 1B1's
Design Report, Terraprobe's Hydrogeological Report and URS Cole Shennan's Transportation
Report will support a Planning requirement for this proposed long tenn expansion of the existing
Horseshoe Valley Lands. This Report will examine in a broad context the feasibility with
respect to engineering services for the subject Comprehensive Development Plan. The topics
covered include the proposed sanitary sewer, domestic water system and stonnwater
management considerations. Included in the foregoing is a discussion on the existing sanitary
sewage treatment plant and the opportunity of constructing a new additional sanitary treatment
plant.
The intent of the Comprehensive Development Plan is to clarify a vision for the long tenn
development of the Horseshoe Resort Valley Lands into a vibrant and expanding year-round
vacation/recreation resort complex. The vision includes the potential expansion of activities
such as downhill ski, golf, cross-country ski, hike and bike and expansion of guest
accommodations and amenities resulting in a comprehensive four season recreation resort
through a 10-15 year implementation program. This vision will unfold through environmentally
responsible and leading edge developments, techniques which will ensure the preservation of the
natural resources of Horseshoe Valley.
2.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION
2.1 Site Description
The subject lands are situated within the Horseshoe Valley between Lines 3 and 4 in the
Township of Oro-Medonte on both sides of Horseshoe Valley Road (County Road 22). A
General Location Plan, Figure 2-1, shows the site location.
2.2 Proposed Development
2.2.1 Development Parcels
To augment the existing development, the Valley Lands of Horseshoe Resort are proposed to
have a number of development parcels that are different in scale, function and character.
N:lLanddev\2002PR0J\33014960IComprehensive PlanlComp. Plan (FebI8.2003).doc -1-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
HORSESHOE VALLEY RESORT
COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
FUNCTIONAL SERVICING REPORT
Potential lands for redevelopment fit within two development areas:
· The existing Valley Lands south of Horseshoe Valley Road;
· The Valley Lands north of Horseshoe Valley Road.
The proposed development context plan is shown on Figure 2-2.
2.2.2 Components
South of Horseshoe Valley Road
The area south of Horseshoe Valley Road is the centre of public downhill ski and other snow
activities in winter and the start point of summer golf and water activities. The south area is
therefore the base for the Resort's commercial activities. A 102 room Hotel and base lodge
facilities serves these activities.
Development south of Horseshoe Valley Road is focused on expansion and reinforcement of the
CDP area through the development of residential timeshare units, expansion of hotel facilities,
the addition of recreational amenities and provision of retail/food service facilities to satisfy the
needs of residents and visitors.
Expansion of the downhill ski runs to the south and east of the existing runs, offers the
opportunity to strengthen the existing Village, improves connections (ski in/ski out) to the
surrounding Highlands development, specifically Carriage Hills and initiate upgrades to existing
winter and summer amenities.
This development is seen as the "core" of the development.
North of Horseshoe Valley Road
Valley Lands north of Horseshoe Valley Road are presently occupied by a private ski club, part
of the I8-hole valley golf course, cross-country ski club, and hikinglbiking trails within a context
of natural landscape and wooded areas.
Established single family subdivisions fonn a perimeter east and north that, while not in the CDP
area, nevertheless, influence the tone of proposed development.
The activities in the northern area are found to be lower key and predominantly nature related as
compared to the "action" oriented activities south of Horseshoe Valley Road.
Development to the north, is intended to integrate with the existing fabric and natural land uses
and generally be lower key and less dense.
N:\Landdev\2002PR0J\33014960\Comprehensive Plan\Comp. Plan (FebJ8.2003).doc -2-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
HORSESHOE VALLEY RESORT
COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
FUNCTIONAL SERVICING REPORT
2.3 Development Principles
The proposed development has been organized to implement the following development
principles:
· enhance and reinforce the core center of activity south of Horseshoe Valley Road;
· create an environment that enhances and encourages pedestrian movements;
· develop and improve pedestrian connections between the Valley and the Highlands by
implementing:
· improved pedestrian routes such as hiking trails
· upgrading and expansion of ski lifts for winter access to upper developments
· internal golf cart paths linking upper and Village developments
2.4 Project Phasing
It is anticipated that the overall build-out of the CDP area will be broken down into a series of
parcels equivalent to 75-100 units in each parcel, equating to a build-out over 10-15 years. It is
understood and anticipated that an inrrastructure for water, sewage, gas and hydro will be
designed and sized to allow flexibility in where, when and how specific parcels are brought
online for implementation. Further, it is acknowledged that each specific parcel will require
rezoning and site plan approval based on detailed site design.
2.5 General Engineering Criteria
The provision of services and design of infrastructure would be completed within the guidelines
and criterion ofthe approving agencies. The following is a list of some applicable criterion:
Oro-Medonte Planning Requirements
Ontario Provincial Standard Specifications (OPSS)
Ontario Provincial Standard Drawings (OPSD)
The Ministry of the Environment Guidelines for sewage collection and water supply
The Ontario Building Code
Electrical Code
The following sections present the details on the topics constituting the basis of the Functional
Servicing Report.
3.0 WATER SUPPLY
3.1 General
A water supply plan for the Horseshoe area of Oro-Medonte was prepared by Knox Martin
Kretch (KMK), Consulting Engineers, dated June 30, 1992 entitled "Report on Valley Zone 1
N:\umddev\2002PR0J\33014960\Comprehensive PJan\Comp. Plan (Feb18.2003).doc - 3-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
HORSESHOE VALLEY RESORT
COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
FUNCTIONAL SERVICING REPORT
Municipal Water System." This plan studied a geographic area which includes the CDP area and
the balance of the Resort's landholdings.
In the above noted report, the water supply system for the Horseshoe Valley communities is
shown divided into two pressure zones; 1 and 2. The Zone 1 system is operated by Horseshoe
Valley Resort and the Zone 2 system is operated by the Township of Oro-Medonte. There is
interconnection between the zones which provides surrogate or alternative water supply for
domestic use and/or fire fighting services in emergency situations to Zone 1 from Zone 2. Other
than this arrangement, the two systems operate independently. The CDP study area lies entirely
in Zone 1 with the upper limit of the system at ground elevation at about 350m above sea level
(ASL) at the existing standpipe. The Zone 1 water supply system lies generally north of the
Zone 2 District and is developed on its own infrastructure. See Figure 3-1 for the Zone 1
Watermain Layout.
According to the Quarterly Water Quality Analysis (April 1 to June 30, 2002) by GEOSPEC
Engineering Ltd, this interconnected, two-zoned water system was established approximately 30
years ago. It has since undergone several modifications and improvements.
3.1.1 Existing Facilities Zone 1
As per the Quarterly Water Quality Analysis (April 1 to June 30, 2002) by GEOSPEC
Engineering Ltd., records indicate that in 1975 three wells existed on site, however well #R-l
was not used shortly thereafter. As a result, water is obtained from two drilled wells, authorized
under The Permit to Take Water, 89-P-3002, renewed on May 8, 2000. Well #R-2 is strictly
utilized for backup and is 18 cm in diameter, while well #R-3 was constructed in 1975 and is
approximately 41 cm in diameter. This third well exclusively provides water to the distribution
system and is approximately 79.6m in depth. This well, and associated pumping facilities, have
the current capability to deliver 3,266m3/day (37.8 lis). The Ministry of the Environment Permit
to Take Water allows a maximum pumping rate of 64.4 lis from this well. Both wells take water
from the deep ground aquifer.
Water is pumped from the wells through the distribution system to the users and storage is
provided at the elevated standpipe. The standpipe is located approximately 280 metres to the
south east of the main hotel building all as shown on Figure 3.1. Water supply is controlled by
the level in the standpipe. The storage tank has a capacity of 773 m3 at a top water level (TWL)
of 380m. Water in the storage tank provides for fire flow demands plus 25% contingency as
outlined in the MOE design guidelines. Distribution consists of a network of 50 to 200 mm
watermains with fire standpipes and hydrants. Since a portion of the Zone 1 service area, namely
Cathedral Pines, is located at a higher elevation, a booster station located on Pine Ridge Trail is
necessary.
Per GEOSPEC, since November 30,2001, treatment at this site entails the automatic injection of
chlorine prior to distribution. The chlorinated water is discharged from the pumping station to
N:lLanddev\2002PR0J\33014960IComprehensive PlanlComp. Plan (Feb18.2003).doc -4-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
HORSESHOE VALLEY RESORT
COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
FUNCTIONAL SERVICING REPORT
the standpipe which provides chlorine contact time, as delineated in Certificate of Approval
6847-4YYG5H, July 26,2001.
3.1.2 Existing Facilities Zone 2
As previously stated in Section 3.1, the CDP study area lies entirely in Zone 1. However, it
should be noted that some development outside the CDP will be built during the time that CDP
area development is to occur. The works set to take place in Zone 2 include the following:
. the transfer of Cathedral Pines from Zone 1 to Zone 2 water system
. Future phases of the Adult Lifestyle which will contain an estimated 465 units
· A Conference Centre comprising 114 equivalent units
The existing and proposed water supply system for Zone 2 is shown on Figure 3-2. The source
of water is from the deep ground aquifer via two wells under the Certificate of Approval (Water),
M2-1 and M2-2, located on the south side of Horseshoe Valley Road. The old well at 6.1 lis at
150m TDH is identified as Well No.2 in the Certificate of Approval (Water). This well is the
original well and is used only as an emergency pump if Well No.1 pump is out of service.
Well No.1 is the duty well supplying 39 lis at 205m TDH providing flow to the system and the
elevated storage tank. In the event that Well No.1 is out for service, Well No.2 would be turned
on, which requires the elevated storage tank to be shut down since Well No.2 cannot fill the
elevated storage tank due to elevation. Therefore the wells have the capacity to deliver 39 lis and
6.1 lis individually and should not be added together for peak hour flow comparisons in the
storage requirement calculations. Only Well No.1 at 39 lis should be used for design
considerations for maximum pump capacity.
Water is pumped from the wells through the distribution system to the users and storage is
provided at the elevated tank, located on Highland Drive, east of the Third Line. The storage
tank has a capacity of 1280 m3 at a top water level (TWL) of 432m. Water in the storage tank
provides for fire flow demands plus 25% contingency as outlined in the MOE design guidelines.
3.2 Design Population
The water system design criteria for the Comprehensive Development Plan will be based on
Table 3.1 which outlines the existing and proposed conceptual population distribution. It also
shows the demands on the water system based on MOE criteria.
3.3 Water System Expansion - Zone 1
Based on calculations noted in Table 3.1 above, the current Zone 1 water system has an adequate
well pumping rate to supply the existing and committed development areas at the Resort. By
upgrading the system to 100 lis, then the well pumping rate will be adequate to service the entire
N:\Landdev\2002PR0J\33014960\Comprehensive Plan\Comp. Plan (FebI8.2003).doc - 5-
I
Table 3.1
Zone 1 Water Demands
I
I
ESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
orseshoe Valle Resort Node
I
EXISTING DEVELOPMENT
Birch Grove Country Club Subdivision
Simcoe Condominium
Pine Ridge Subdivision
aplecrest Subdivision
X - Country Ski Lodge
Heights Chalet
Existing Inn Hotel
Existing Timeshare and Base Lodge
Hotel Expansion (imminent connection)
Cathedral Pines
I
I
I
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
Timber Ridge
Northwest Lands
imber Ridge Townhouse Form Unit Clusters
own house Form Clusters beside X-Country Chalet
Private Ski Club Unit Clusters
Hillside Resort
North Resort
Condo Hotel (Current Proposal)
Hotel Condominium
Resort Expansion
Timeshare Suites
Stacked Unit Clusters
I
I
I
COMMERCIAL I RETAIL DEVELOPMENT
I
Existing Commercial Development
Chalet - Horseshoe
Chalet - Private Ski Club
I
Possible Commercial Development
Country Market
halet - XC Ski Club
Recreation I Sports Centre
Restaurant I Bar
I
Total Population
I
Designated
I
Average day
Maximum day
Peak hour
Unit
47 3.50
65 2.50
65 3.50
50 3.50
127 2.00
70 3.00
76 3.00
250
50
100
30
72
48
198
76
75
180
208
(m3/ day)
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
1,965
(Seats)
3.00
3.00
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.00
2.00
3.00
3.00
2.50
2.50
Area
(ha.)
0.24
0.12
0.17
0.12
0.15
0.50
165
163
228
175
25
40
254
210
228
o
750
150
250
75
180
96
396
228
225
450
520
24
12
17
12
15
983
Pop. Flow MOE Peaking Total Flows
(I/cap/day) Factor (I/s)
5869 450 1 30.57
5869 450 2.00 61.14
5869 450 3,00 91.70
I
Assume that the permitted well pumping rate of 64.4l1s can be increased to 100 lis.
A Population of 5869, requires 157 lIs of fire flow for 3 hours (MOE)
Total Storage Requirements = A + B + C (MOE criteria)
I
A = Fire Storage
B = Equalization Storage ( 25% max. day demand)
C Emergency (25 % of A + B)
I
A
FIRE
m3
Notes: 1696
. Based on 100P/ha (Town of Markham criteria)
When peak hour is less than well pumping rate, then B = 0
Current standpipe storage is 773 m3
I
N:/Landev/CN33014960/ComprehensiveplanITable 3.1 WaterZn.1 PumpRt1 OO.xls
B
EQUALIZATION
m3
o
C
EMER.
m3
424
TOTAL
STORAGE
m3
2,120
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
HORSESHOE VALLEY RESORT
COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
FUNCTIONAL SERVICING REPORT
CDP area, The existing storage capacity of the standpipe however, will be deficient to service
and of the CDP area and will therefore have to be upgraded and/or replaced in one of the early
stages of development of the CDP area. Detailed engineering regarding this upgrade shall be
provided when the project, which triggers the works, can be done.
3.4 Water System Expansion - Zone 2
Based on Table 3.2 with the addition of the Cathedral Pines subdivision and the ultimate
completion of all of the Adult Lifestyle development proposal and the Conference Centre,
increased well capacity will be required. As with the Zone 1 areas, expansion requirements will
be assessed as each phase proceeds and the necessary staged infrastructure constructed to
adequately service all Zone 2 users at all times. If the current well pumping rate of 39 l/sec is
increased to 70 l/sec, then the total system demand and reservoir storage requirements for the
ultimate development scenario of Zone 2 will be satisfied.
4.0 SANITARY SEWER SERVICING
4.1 General
Development in the Township including all of the existing subdivisions at Horseshoe Resort has
taken place generally on private systems; that is septic tanks and tile beds for the treatment and
disposal of sewage. Various developments at the Resort including but not limited to the existing
Hotel Lodges Timeshare I Base Lodge area as well as the Carriage Hills time share
developments and the Adult Life Community (Landscapes) are exceptions in that the sewage
from these sites are serviced through a system of sanitary sewers ranging in size from l50mm to
300mm in diameter and by a sequential batch reactor (SBR) treatment plant. Refer to Figure 4-1,
Sanitary Sewer System.
URS Cole Sherman's FSP for the condominium Hotel expansion (dated February 2003) indicates
that the current SBR has adequate permitted capacity for all connected users plus the Adult
Lifestyle Phase 1 and Phase 2 area (100 units), Carriage Hills, Phase 4 (85 equivalent units) and
the proposed condominium Hotel expansion.
4.2 Sanitary Sewage Capacity
The CDP area is to be serviced on full sewage treatment. The present Certificate of Approval
capacity of the existing SBR plant is 810 m3/day. As well, there is a potential for expansion of
the current plant to accommodate from 1000 to 1200 m3/day. With the committed flow being
759 m3 including the Hotel Expansion, the spare capacity without any changes or upgrades is
51m3 which equates to approximately 37 units assuming a 3.0 person/unit density. Beyond the
Hotel Expansion and this remaining capacity of a 37 unit development, the existing plant must be
upgraded to increase the present capacity. Before this is done however, a study should be done
N:\Landdev\2002PR0J\33014960\Comprehensive Plan\Comp. Plan (FebI8.2003).doc -6-
I
I
I
Table 3.2
Zone 2 Water Demands
I
Number Per
of Units Unit
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
iHorseshoe Vallev Resort Node
EXISTING DEVELOPMENT
'Carriage Hills Ph I 52 2.50 130
Carriage Hills Ph II 52 2.50 130
Carriage Hills Ph III 68 2,50 170
Adult Lifestyle Phase I & II 100 3.50 350
Highlands I Subdivision 69 3.50 242
Highlands II Subdivision 38 3.50 133
Highlands III Subdivision 8 3.50 28
Highlands IV Subdivision 192 3.50 672
Estate Lots 13 3.00 39
Carriage Hills Resort - PH IV 85 2.50 213
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
Adult Lifestyle - Future Phases 465 3.50 1,628
L;onference Centre 114 3.00 342
IDeve/opment to be Transferred from Zone 1 to Zone 2
ICathedral Pines Subdivision 96 3.50 336
ITotal Population 4,4121
I
I
I
I
I
I
Designated Pop. Flow MOE Peaking Total Flows
(I/cap/day) Factor (1/5)
Average day 4412 450 1 22.98
Maximum day 4412 450 2.00 45.95
Peak hour 4412 450 3.00 68.93
I
I
Assume that the pumping rate of 39.0 I/s will be increased to 70 I/s to meet the Maximum Day Demand.
A Population of 4412, requires 132.8 lIs of fire flow for 2 hours
I
Total Storage Requirements = A + B + C (MOE criteria)
I
A = Fire Storage
B = Equalization Storage ( 25% max. day demand)
C = Emergency (25 % of A + B)
A
FIRE
m3
B
EaUALlZA TION
m3
C
EMER.
m3
TOTAL
STORAGE
m3
956
o
239
1195
I
Notes:
Current reservior capacity is 1280 m3
I
I
I
I N:/Landev/CN33014960/ComprehensiveplanITabIe3.2WaterZn.2.xJs
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
HORSESHOE VALLEY RESORT
COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
FUNCTIONAL SERVICING REPORT
to detennine whether upgrading the present plant or building a new one would be more cost
effective.
When additional sewage capacity is necessary then further investigation will be done for the
design of a completely new treatment plant which will be appropriately sized and phased for that
segment and future units. The general location of this new plant will be near the existing SBR,
however the exact location will be decided upon in the detailed design stages. New sanitary
sewers will also be designed and constructed to suit phasing and capacity requirements. The
entire CDP area can be appropriately serviced with full sewage treatment whether it is done
through the existing expanded plant or by a completely new treatment plant.
4.3 Sanitary Sewage Flows
The following table 4.1 illustrates the current users of the plant and the imminent and proposed
developments that would also make use of the existing SBR plant facility and the
aforementioned new Treatment Plant.
4.4 Sewage Effluent Disposal
As stated in the Draft Hydrogeologic Assessment (dated January 2003) by Terraprobe, the CDP
area is in a rural setting with no major surrounding surface bodies of water. As such, there are a
number of viable options available with regard to the disposal of effluent treated to MOE
standards:
· exfiltration cells (used by the current SBR)
· spray irrigation (sprayed on golf courses, ski areas and/or undeveloped areas of the
resort)
· snow making (onto open undeveloped areas of the resort)
· conventional infiltration techniques
· spray evaporation techniques
These techniques can be used together or exclusively as required to dispose of the treated
effluent. The method of disposal to be used for each stage of the expansion will be decided as
development proceeds.
5.0 GRADING AND DRAINAGE
Details regarding grading and drainage will be closely studied as each project comes on line.
Criteria to be followed on a project by project basis are as follows:
1. Grading requirements of a development must be resolved within the property boundary.
N:\Landdev\2002PR0J\330J4960\Comprehensive Plan\Comp. Plan (FebJ8.2003).doc -7-
~------------------
Table 4.1
Design Flows to Wastewater Treatment Plant
Users Flow Per # of r # of Total Flow
Person/Day (m3/d) ! Personsl Pop. (m3/d)
Units Unit
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
Horseshoe Vallev Resort Node
EXISTING DEVELOPMENT
ICarriage Hills Ph I 0.45 52 2.50 130.00 59
Carriage Hills Ph II 0.45 52 2.50 130.00 59
Carriage Hills Ph III 0.45 68 2.50 170.00 77
Adult Lifestyle Phase I + II 0.45 100 3.50 350.00 158
Carriage Hills Resort - PH IV 0.45 85 3.00 255.00 115
Existing Inn Hotel 0.45 127 2.00 254.00 114
Existing Timeshare and Base Lodge 0.45 70 3.00 I 210.00 95
Hotel Expansion (imminent connection) 0.45 76 3.00 228.00 103
630 Units
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
Adult Lifestyle - Future Phases 0.45 465 3.50 1,627.50 732
Timber Ridge 0.45 250 3.00 750.00 338
Northwest Lands 0.45 50 3.00 150.00 68
Conference Centre 0.45 114 3.00 342.00 154
879 Units
POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
ITimber Ridge Townhouse Form Unit Clusters 0.45 100 2.50 250.00 113
!Townhouse Form Clusters beside X-Country Chalet 0.45 30 2.50 75.00 34
Private Ski Club Unit Clusters 0.45 72 2.50 180.00 81
I 202 I Units
)
Horseshoe Villaae I
I i
POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT I
Hillside Resort I I 96.00
0.45 I 48 ! 2.00 ! 43
North Resort 0.45 j 198 ! 2.00 I 396.00 178
I 246 Units !
I
Condo Hotel (Current Proposal) 0.45 I 76 3.00 I 228.00 103
Hotel Condominium 0.45 75 225.00 101
I 3.00
Resort Expansion I
Timeshare Suites 0.45 180 2.50 450.00 203
Stacked Unit Clusters 0.45 208 2.50 520.00 234
539 Units
TOTAL OVERALL RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT: 7,017
I
Area I Area ! Population
COMMERCIAL I RETAIL DEVELOPMENT (m2) (ha.)
!
Existing Commercial Development !
IChalet - Horseshoe 0.45 2,400 I 0.241 24.00 11
IChalet - Private Ski Club 0.45 1,200 0.12 12.00 5
Possible Commercial Development I 17.30 I
Country Market 0.45 1,730 I 0.17 8
Chalet - XC Ski Club 0.45 1,200 ! 0.12 12.00 I 5
Recreation I Sports Centre 0.45 1,500 I 0.15 I 15.00 7
Restaurant I Bar 0.45 1,9651 0.50 I 982.50 I 221
(Seats) I I
TOTAL OVERALL COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT: I I 80.30 I
! I
J
Total Population 7,097
I !
Total Committed Flow (m3) I I 3,415
T"reatment Capacity (m3) ; 810
Increased Treatment Capacity Required (m3) 2,605
!
!
N:lLanddev/CN33014960/comprehensive plan/lable 4.1 sanilaryusersll.xls
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
HORSESHOE VALLEY RESORT
COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
FUNCTIONAL SERVICING REPORT
2. Cuts and fills should be minimized and blended into the existing terrain as much as
possible.
3. Generally, retaining walls should be less than five feet high. In cases where a retaining
wall exceeds five feet, it should be stepped and landscaped. Timber retaining walls are
generally discouraged.
4. Slopes of cut and fill areas should be determined by soil characteristics for the specific site
to avoid erosion and promote re-vegetation opportunities.
5. Maximum allowable slope is 2:1 for grass areas.
6.0 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
A stormwater management plan will be prepared for each subject site that addresses erosion,
quality, quantity, and infiltration (recharge) issues as required by the approval agencies. The
stormwater management plan will include the use of enhanced drainage swales, enclosed piped
systems, wet ponds, filter strips and recharge basins. Drainage swales will be used wherever
possible throughout the site to capture runoff and convey it to the proposed central stormwater
management ponds, while providing some quality treatment and enhanced opportunity for
infiltration.
All Storm Water Management Practices (SWMPs) shall be designed in accordance with the
current MOE design guidelines. The cumulative effect of these SWMPs shall be to treat the
runoff to Level 1 requirements. Sufficient attenuation would be provided on site to reduce peak
outflows associated with the 2 to 100 year design storm events to their predevelopment
condition. Sufficient detention would be provided to ensure that recharge to the groundwater
system is maintained.
The subject site can be divided into 4 major development areas for stormwater treatment and
attenuation purposes. These are:
Area I - Hotel Expansion,
Area 2 - South Expansion (Hillside Resort, North Resort, and Horseshoe Village
Expansion),
Area 3 - North Expansion (Clusters beside cross-country Chalet, Private Ski Club Clusters,
and Timber Ridge Unit Clusters), and
Area 4 - Timber Ridge.
The locations of the four areas are identified in Figure 6-1.
The following provides a brief review of the stormwater management approach to be considered
for each of the four major development areas. Detailed modeling of the existing and proposed
N:ILanddev\2002PR0J\33014960IComprehensive PlanlComp. Plan (FebI8.2003).doc -8-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
HORSESHOE VALLEY RESORT
COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
FUNCTIONAL SERVICING REPORT
conditions and design of the required stonnwater management features would be completed at
the engineering design stage.
6.1 Area 1 - Hotel Expansion
The hotel expansion will require construction of a dry pond for stonnwater quantity treatment
and erosion control and the maintenance of recharge. Its approximate location is identified on
Figure 6-1. Runoff from the urbanized area of the site, which includes roadways, parking lots
and the building, would be collected by a stonn sewer system designed to handle the flow
associated with the 5 year design event.
Quality control for the site would be provided by a Stonnceptor or approved equivalent.
6.2 Area 2 - South Expansion
The South Expansion shall have a combined stonn sewers and overland flow systems to convey
runoff to the treatment and storage facilities. Methods of capture, conveyance and treatment
shall be detennined in future studies. Pond sites have been proposed within the North Resort
development area and along the south boundary of the Horseshoe Village expansion. There are
potentially three locations where stonnwater management facilities would be constructed. They
are identified in Figure 6-1. The number and exact location of the required facilities would be
established when more detailed infonnation on the site topography and development are
available.
6.3 Area 3 - North Expansion
The North Expansion shall have stonn sewers and overland flow systems to convey runoff to
potentially two treatment and storage facilities. Methods of capture, conveyance and treatment
shall be detennined in future studies. There is the potential to utilize two existing ponds within
the golf course immediately east and north of the Timber Ridge Unit Clusters, retrofitted to
perfonn as wet ponds. If grading and runoff routing concerns preclude these ponds from being
the exclusive method of treatment and attenuation for this drainage area, another potential site
for a facility is at the north limit ofthe area (refer to Figure 6-1).
6.4 Area 4 - Timber Ridge
Timber Ridge shall have a combined stonn sewers and overland flow systems to convey runoff
to the treatment and storage facilities. Based on the available topographic infonnation, it would
appear that one central facility could service the entire development area. Its location is
identified on Figure 6-1.
N:ILanddevI2002PR0J\33014960IComprehensive PlanlComp. Plan (FebI8.2003).doc -9-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
HORSESHOE VALLEY RESORT
COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
FUNCTIONAL SERVICING REPORT
6.5 Stormwater Management Summary
Results of the preliminary stOmlwater management assessments confimled that the proposed
approach to addressing the quality, quantity and recharge requirements of the development could
be addressed by the retrofitting of ponds located within the existing golf course and the
construction of new facilities. Where appropriate, consideration should be given to locating new
facilities within the golf course area. Properly designed, it could not only be an amenity but
provide a potential secondary source of water for irrigation purposes.
Although the developed conceptual stOmlwater management plan identifies the number and
location of the centralized facilities, consideration should also be given to the use of enhanced
swales to provide dispersed quality treatment and recharge enhancement.
7.0 TRANSPORTATION
In June 2000, URS Cole Shemlan & Associates Ltd. prepared a report entitled Traffic
Assessment Report for the Horseshoe Valley Settlement Node Lands for the Horseshoe Resort
Corporation. However, since the preparation of the study, the development concept for the
subject lands have been refined somewhat. Due to these changes, a follow-up traffic review was
undertaken to develop revised traffic projections, review the need for road and intersection
improvements, and document the staging of the improvements.
Refer to URS Cole Sherman's report under separate cover referred above.
8.0 CONCLUSIONS
In summary, we believe all servicing components of the Comprehensive Development Plan for
development of future expansion of the Valley area of Horseshoe Resort can be provided as
required to allow orderly development to proceed while always providing the level of service
required. The key servicing components of expansion are:
1. Water System
- There are 2 pressure zones within the Horseshoe Valley Resort Node.
- Zone 1 serves the CDP area and beyond and will require an increase in well pump
capacity and a new storage reservoir. The precise timing of these upgrades should
be detemlined and reviewed as each stage of development proceeds.
- Zone 2 serves the Highlands area and will require increases in well pumping rate
to serve the ultimate proposed development.
2. Sanitary Sewer System
- The sewage flows expected to be generated by the first phases of the CDP
development will be able to be processed by the existing treatment plant or an
N:\Landdev\2002PR0J\33014960\Comprehensive Plan\Comp. Plan (FehI8.2003).doc -10-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
HORSESHOE VALLEY RESORT
COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
FUNCTIONAL SERVICING REPORT
expansion of that plant, however, flows from most of the proposed development
must be treated at a new sewage treatment plant proposed to be located adjacent to
the current plant.
- Treated effluent from the proposed new sewage treatment plant is proposed to be
disposed exclusively or by a combination of the following methods:
· ex filtration cells
· spray irrigation
· snow making
· conventional infiltration
· spray evaporation
3. Stormwater Management
- Each stage of the proposed development will be required to re-review stormwater
management and ground recharge issues when the specifics of each phase of
development proceeds.
- It is intended, however, that the required ponds be located and sized in such a way
as to minimize the number of facilities.
N:ILanddev\2002PR0J\33014960IComprehensive PlanlComp. Plan (FebI8.2003).doc -11-
-------------------
Figure 2-1 - General Location
-----
------
-------
-
50 LOTS
TIMBER RIDGE
TOWNHOUSE FORM
UNIT CLUSTERS
SIMCOE
CONDOMINIUM
MAPLECREST
SUBDIVISION
55 UNITS
50 lOTS
HORSESHOE VALLEY
VILLAGE PLANNING
BOUNDARY
.$"'~-$"-$'"-'_.-::::l
EXIS I \NG SEWER
EASEM NT
PRIV A SKI
CLUB IT
CLUST S
TIMBER RIDGE
250 UNITS PROPOSED
72 UNITS
X-C SKI
CHALET
NORTHWEST
LANDS
HILLSIDE RESORT
48 UNITS
102 SUITES
EXISTING DAY
LODGE
EXISTING TIME
SHARE
40 UNfTS
RECREA TION
CENTRE
HOTEL CONDO
75 UNITS
CARRIAGE HILLS
RESORT - IV
78 UNITS
EXISTING SEWER
EASEMENT
'\/
o TEN TIA lYA
SKI HILL "0A
EXPANSION ~~~
\~
RECREATION
AREA
HIGHLANDS
SUBDIVISION
PHASE I
69 LOTS
CARRIAGE HILLS
RESORT - I, II, III
52 UNITS,S2 UNITS,68 UNITS =- 172 UNITS
HIGHLANDS
SUBDIVISION
PHASE IV
NEW 18 HOLE
GOLF COURSE
ADULT LIFE5i YLE
DEVELOPMEfiT
PHASE 1- 65 LOTS I
!
1
/
,/
192 LOTS
!
~
f
I
t
.t
Ii
(
\
\",
-"':"
l
A "3'FYl::E,,",,,,,,
" DEVELOPMENT "
~.__.._. '. .FU TURE PHASES - 500 LOTS
_ TOTAL" 565 LOTS
f
~"~"''''''''''''''''''~;'''''''''''N-~'"''''''~*''''w,>',,;cv,,''>'.''./
HORSESHOE VALLEY
RESORT
Land Use
COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONTEXT PLAN
Fig. 2-2
GROUP
FEBRUARY 2003
-------------------
I
0:
HEIGHTS "
I
CHALET:
X.c. BASE q
LODGE . \
I
I
8:wo
8:80
OIZ;Z
o.~o
N:ClJU
.
,
TOWNSfIIP OF
ORO - MEDONTE
WELLR-l "Ih
(ABANDONED),:~
WELL R-3 1~
e.!>../:.'.
\ ~ -',' -,,c;
"'...
,
~
~
f1
~_ LEGEND:
I
~E
<I~
00
~S!
g, - PROP, WATERMAIN
)'~
~~
l~
~~
CARRI AGE HillS ElEV A TED iT ANK
...F.:K~9.9)P~...~..- _._.__~x 200mm . J 28Q rfr13
.. ............ .. ......_-........ ..,..........'...... _.... ....-,~~:...,..."__...,.~,~,i.;
..............
,
,
'._",
,
,
,
,
.tTJ
:~
iN
,0
.0
':J
,,-,
:s
I
Figure No,
3-1
HORSESHOE VALLEY COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
SC!'I!e
1:7500
Cole Sherman
Date
January 2003
ZONE 1 W A TERMAIN LAYOUT
Project No.
33014960
-------------------
PHASE 1
.------- EXISTING W A TERMAJN
FUTURE WATERMAIN
ITIJ \V A TERMAlN NODE
NOTr~ MINOH PIPES ARE NOT SHOWN
Figm<.:No,
HORSESHOE V ALLEY COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
3-2
Scale
1:10,000
Cole Sherman
ZONE 2 W A TERMAIN
Date
January 2003
Project No.
33014960
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
---- - EXISTING SAN SEWER
- - - FUTURE SAN SEWER
.. - - -.. FUTURE FORCEMAIN
EXISTING
SEW AGE
TREATMENT
PLANT
I
I
I
"
~
:iI
;!!:
,...
I
\
PHASE 1
NOTE: MINOR PIPES ARE NOT SHOWN
Cole Sherman
SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM
HORSESHOE VALLEY COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
-------------------
AREA 4
@
.......... .....
LEGEND:
POTENTIAL LOCATION
OF STORM WATER
MANAGEMENT PONDS
;""""
<< \
.... -. .I
DEVELOPMENT AREA LIMIT
(REFER TO TEXT)
AREA 2
DEVELOPMENT AREA
IDENTIFICA TION
f
E
~
of
II
HORSESHOE VALLEY
RESORT
CONCEPTUAL STORMWATER
MANAGEMENT PLAN
Land Use
CONTEXT PLAN
FEBRUARY 2003
(>:'')~$
ffiI
GROUP
FIG. 6-1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TRAFFIC REVIEW
FOR THE
HORSESHOE VALLEY
SETTLEMENT NODE LANDS
Prepared By:
URS Cole, Sherman & Associates Ltd.
75 Commerce Valley Drive East
Markham, Ontario
L3T 7N9
URS
Cole Sherman
February, 2003
I
I
TRAFFIC REVIEW FOR THE
HORSESHOE V ALLEY SETTLEMENT NODE LANDS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I
Ex ecutiv e Summary....................................................................................................................... . ii
Revised Dev el op men t Plan ...... ............. ........................................................................ .......... ... ii
I
I
I
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
4.1
4.2
5.0
5.1
5.2
5.3
6.0
6.1
6.2
6.3
6.4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
7.0
I
8.0
I
Revised Traffic V 0 Jumes .............................. ........................................ ..................................... ii
Operati ooal Revi ew ............................................................ ........... ......................................... ..iii
In tersecti on Imp ro verneR ts and Staging ..... ......................... ...... ........................................... ..iii
Relation to Existing Planning Approvals................................................................................. v
I ntroductio n ..... ................................................................................................................... 1
Background Information ..... .... ..... ... ......................... ... .... ................ ..... ......... ... ................. 2
Revis ed Development P'lan ..... ................. ........................ ....... ............... .... ..... ........ ............ 4
New Site Traffic ................... ..... ........ .......... .... ..... ..... ..... ........... ... ......... ........ ....... .... ........... 6
Revised Traffic Volumes ...... ................................. ..... ... .............. .......... ... ........ ............. 6
Traffi. c Assignment ............ ....... ..... ....... ..... ........... .... ........... ............ ........ ....... ............ ... 7
Updated Total Traffic Volumes ....... ...... ...... ................ ............ ................ ............... ........... 9
T otaI Future Tram c....... ....... ...... .... ........ ................. ..... .............. .... .... .... ....... ............... 9
Intersection Imp rov emen ts...... ..... ........ ....... ........... .... ...... ... ......... ..... ....... ... ............... 10
Operational Review............. .................... ........... ....... .... ...... ..... ... .... ..... ... ........ .... ........ 12
Improvement Staging .................... ..... ....... ................... ..... ... .......... ...... ................... ...... ... 13
County Road 22 / 3rd Line Intersection .....................................................................13
County Road 22/ Horseshoe Valley Resort Entrance Intersection ........................13
County Road 22/ 4th Line Intersection .....................................................................15
Summary of Changes to the Improvement Staging .................................................15
Concept Plan Design ..... .......... .......................... ..................... .......... .... ..... ............. .... ......18
Co nc Ius ions and Recommendations .......... .............. ............. ......... ........ ............. ..... ........ 19
Appendix 1- Detailed Trip Generation
I
I
I
February, 2003
33014950
Page i
URS
I
Co!e Sherman
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TRAFFIC REVIEW FOR THE
HORSESHOE VALLEY SETTLEMENT NODE LANDS
exECUTIVE SUMMARY
In June 2000, URS Cole Sherman & Associates Ltd. prepared the final Traffic Assessment
Report for the Horseshoe Valley Settlement Node Lands for the Horseshoe Resort Corporation.
However, since the preparation of the study, the development concept for a portion of the subject
lands have been refined somewhat. Due to these changes, a follow-up traffic review was
undertaken to develop revised traffic projections, review the need for road and intersection
I
improvements, and document the staging of the improvements.
Revised Development Plan
There have been several development changes that would affect the findings of the previous
traffic study. The resultant concept plan for the subject lands is summarized in the following
table.
1 Med Density 452 dwelling units
2 Low Densi 95 dwellin units
3 Low Density 66 dwelling units
Hotel 359 rooms
4 Med Density 428 dwelling units
Commercial 19 000 s . ft GL
5 Med Density 75 dwelling units
61 Med Density 68 dwelling units
Low Density 729 dwelling units
Golf Course 9 holes
7 Hotel 114 rooms
New 2 Low Densit 50 dwellin units
1: The 9-hole golf course expansion was recently constructed.
2: Lands located north of County Road 22 near 3rd Line (west of Zone 1).
The zone system is described in Section 2.0 of this report.
Revised Traffic Volumes
The trip projections associated with the proposed development concept are summarized in the
following table.
February. 2003
33014950
Page ii
URS
CO!e Sherman
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TRAFFIC REVIEW FOR THE
HORSESHOE VALLEY SETTLEMENT NODE LANDS
WINTER TRAFFIC 825 695 1,520 -13% -235
SUMMER TRAFFIC 805 676 1,481 -16% -277
Based on the updated development information, the primary findings pertaining to trip
generation are summarized below:
. Zone 1: The net change in traffic due to the change in uses and scale for the Village north of
County Road 22 is minor;
. Zone 4: The net change in traffic due to the change in uses and scale for the Village south of
County Road 22 is minor;
. Zone 6: A 30% reduction in traffic is expected due to the change in development scale; and
. Total Traffic: Due to the development changes, a net decrease in traffic of about 15% is
expected for the Horseshoe Valley Settlement Node lands.
Based on a comparison of the updated total traffic volumes for the previous and updated concept
plans, it was determined that the projected total traffic volumes in the area are generally less than
that which was previously proposed. This is due to the diminished development scale associated
with the current concept plan.
Operational Review
The boundary intersections are anticipated to operate acceptably. There is no need for additional
intersection or road link improvements based on the updated traffic volumes, as compared to
those outlined in the previous Traffic Assessment Report for the Horseshoe Valley Settlement
Node Lands report. It should also be noted that no improvements have been deleted.
Intersection Improvements and Staging
The following is a list of the recommended intersection improvements:
. County Road 22 / 3rd Line Intersection: the provision of an exclusive right turn lane on
the eastbound approach, an exclusive left turn lane on the westbound approach, and a
widening of the northbound approach to provide for an exclusive left turn lane with a
separate right turn lane.
In order to achieve the benefits of construction "economies-of-scale", it would be
preferable to construct the eastbound right turn lane, the westbound left turn lane, and the
northbound approach widening (to provide for an exclusive left turn lane with a separate
right turn lane) at this intersection all at the same time. Therefore, the improvements at
this intersection should be implemented simultaneously when a total of approximately
300 to 350 units are constructed in Zones 5 and 6 (the lands adjacent to 3rd Line,
Highland Drive and Alpine Way);
February, 2003
33014950
Page iii
URS
Cole Shennan
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TRAFFIC REVIEW FOR THE
HORSESHOE VALLEY SEITLEMENT NODE LANDS
. County Road 22 I Horseshoe Valley Resort Entrance Intersection: provision of signalized
traffic control, exclusive eastbound right turn lane, and exclusive left turn lanes on all
four approaches.
The eastbound right turn lane should be constructed in the short term. The construction of
the eastbound and westbound left turn lanes should be undertaken simultaneously with
any significant development in the Horseshoe Valley Village or the construction of any
combination of approximately 300 residential units located in Zones 2, 3, 6 and 7. In
order to achieve the benefits of construction "economies-of-scale", it would be preferable
to construct the eastbound and westbound left turn lanes, as well as the northbound and
southbound approach throat widenings (to provide for exclusive left turn lanes)
simultaneously. The traffic signals should be installed when there is significant
development within the Horseshoe Valley Village, such as the construction of a
significant component of either the hotel uses or the residential uses in the Horseshoe
Valley Village (Zone 4). However, it is recognized that the signals should only be
installed after the need is confirmed through application of the traffic control signal
installation warrant guidelines contained in the Ministry of Transportation of Ontario's
(MTO) Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices.
The Resort and the County of Simcoe have entered into an Agreement to ensure the
provision of these intersection improvements at the Resort entrance, requiring that all of
the Resort entrance laning improvements, except for signalization, be undertaken, or
financially secured, prior to final approvals being given to the development of a proposed
76-suite hotel expansion in the Horseshoe Valley Village. Underground infrastructure
works for the signals, such as handwells and ducting, are to be put in place for future
signalization. As noted above, the signals would be installed after the need is confirmed
through application of the warrant guidelines contained in the Manual of Uniform Traffic
Control Devices.
. County Road 22 14th Line: provision of an exclusive eastbound right turn lane, eastbound
and westbound left turn lanes, and a minor widening of the northbound approach to
provide for an exclusive left turn lane with a separate right turn lane.
The eastbound right turn lane should be constructed when a total of approximately 250
units are developed in Zones 6 and 7 (the lands adjacent to Highland Drive, Alpine Way
and 4th Line). The construction of the eastbound and westbound left turn lanes, and the
northbound approach throat widening (to provide for an exclusive left turn lane with a
separate right turn lane) should be undertaken simultaneously with the construction of
any combination of approximately 600 residential units located in Zones 6 and 7.
In summary, the improvements and the staging are unchanged. The only exception is the timing
of the westbound left turn lane at the County Road 22 / Horseshoe Valley Resort entrance which
is now based on the development of approximately 300 residential units (as opposed to the 250
units identified in the previous Traffic Assessment Report) in Zones 2, 3, 6 and 7, as well as the
installation of traffic signals which is now based on significant development within the
Horseshoe Valley Village, such as the construction of a large component of either the hotel uses
or the residential uses in the Horseshoe Valley Village (Zone 4).
February, 2003
330] 4950
URS
Page iv
Cole Sherman
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TRAFFIC REVIEW FOR THE
HORSESHOE VALLEY SETTLEMENT NODE LANDS
Relation to Existing Planning Approvals
The improvement staging in the Township of Oro-Medonte's Official Plan is consistent with the
derived phasing requirements in this traffic review. The only exception is for the provision of the
westbound left turn lane at the County Road 22 I Horseshoe Valley Resort entrance. The staging
in the Official Plan is more rigorous than that determined in this study (i.e. required at 250 units
instead of the derived 300 units), which is now based on a slightly reduced development yield for
the Horseshoe Valley Settlement Node lands. Thus, adherence to the staging scenario identified
in the Official Plan would result in transportation infrastructure in advance of the actual
calculated need and thereby improved network operations.
In fact, the above referenced Agreement between the Resort and the County of Simcoe ensures
that the provision of the intersection improvements at the Resort entrance are undertaken or
financially secured prior to final approvals being given to the development of the proposed 76-
suite hotel expansion in the Horseshoe Valley Village.
Since the development scale is reduced from that which was previously modeled and also since
the Resort is not pursuing a change to the identified intersection improvements (or staging), an
updated comprehensive traffic assessment report is not required.
February, 2003
33014950
Page v
URS
CO!8 Sherman
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TRAFFIC REVIEW FOR THE
HORSESHOE VALLEY SE7TLEMENT NODE LANDS
1..0 INTRODUCTION
In June 2000, URS Cole Sherman & Associates Ltd. prepared the final Traffic Assessment
Reportfor the Horseshoe Valley Settlement Node Lands for the Horseshoe Resort Corporation.
The traffic study was undertak.en to fulfill a requirement of the Township's Official Plan noting
that a Traffic Study must be prepared to assess the impacts of development within the Horseshoe
Valley Settlement Node lands on Horseshoe Valley Road, 3rd Line and 4th Line. In summary, the
purpose of the study was to:
· Assess existing traffic conditions;
· Forecast future traffic associated with the proposed uses;
· Assess the future traffic operations of the boundary road intersections and site entrances;
· Identify operational concerns and required mitigation measures such as road and I or
intersection improvements; and
· Identify the timing of improvements required for these roads that are directly attributable to
developments within the subject lands.
However, since the preparation of the Traffic Assessment Report for the Horseshoe Valley
Settlement Node Lands, the development concept for a portion of the subject lands have been
refined somewhat. Located in the geographic centre of the Horseshoe Valley Settlement Node is
the Village Core to the Resort. This area hosts most of the commercial and recreational
residential development at the Resort. This area is subject to development of further study in the
form of a Comprehensive Development Plan (CDP). The original Traffic Assessment Report
identified some land uses which, due to further study, have been somewhat modified. There have
also been some limited changes to what was then proposed development in the Highlands area of
the Resort most notably the development of a proposed medium density timeshare site to estate
residential lots. Due to these changes, a follow-up traffic review has been undertak.en to:
· Review the updated development information;
· Develop revised traffic projections:
· Confirm the appropriateness of the previously identified road and intersection improvement
program;
· Identify new improvements, if any; and
· Review and revise, if necessary, the identified improvement staging program.
The results and findings of the follow-up review are outlined herein.
February. 2003
33014950
Page 1
URS
CO'e Shennan
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TRAFFIC REVIEW FOR THE
HORSESHOE VALLEY SEITLEMENT NODE LANDS
2..0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION
In order to simplify the traffic review, the assessment was based on the zonal system identified in
the previous Traffic Assessment Report for the Horseshoe Valley Settlement Node Lands,
wherein the subject lands were divided into seven traffic zones based on existing and potential
points of access/egress. These are:
. Zone 1: Access via the north leg of the County Road 22 / Horseshoe Valley Resort
Entrance intersection;
. Zone 2: Access via the minor streets fronting onto County Road 22 (Beechwood
Road, Maple Crest Court, and Pine Court);
. Zone 3: Access via the north leg of the County Road 22 / 4th Line intersection;
. Zone 4: Access via the south leg of the County Road 22 / Horseshoe Valley Resort
Entrance intersection;
. Zone 5: Access via 3rd Line;
. Zone 6: Access via Highland Drive and Alpine Way to both 3rd Line and 4th Line; and
. Zone 7: Access via 4th Line.
The locations of the traffic zones are illustrated in Figure 2-1.
The critical period of evaluation identified in the previous study was determined to be the winter
p.m. peak hour.
February, 2003
33014950
Page 2
URS
Co!e Shennan
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TRAFFIC REVIEW FOR THE
HORSESHOE VALLEY SEITLEMENT NODE LANDS
- ~TV"J - -
-- -- LAVL-' J!J ----J. - --
HORSESHOE
VALLEY ROAD
ZONE 4
\
3m LINE "'-
\
ZONE 6
! I
I I
I
I
lib-
BASS lAKE
SIDDWAD
FIGURE 5-1
TRAFFIC ZONES
February. 2003
33014950
Page 3
URS
Co!e Sherman
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TRAFFIC REVIEW FOR THE
HORSESHOE VALLEY SETTLEMENT NODE LANDS
3..0 REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN
There have been several development changes that would affect the findings of the previous
traffic study. The key changes are described below:
. Zone 1: An increase in medium density residential units is proposed. However, the
previously proposed hotel is deleted. The overall change to the total zone traffic projections
is expected to be a minor reduction;
. Zone 4: Several hundred medium density residential units are now proposed. However, the
commercial uses are now significantly reduced in scale. Furthermore, the previous study
assumed that 27 new golf course holes would be developed in the area. However, no new
golf holes are proposed in this zone (instead, nine holes were recently constructed in Zone 6).
The overall change to the total zone traffic projections is expected to be a minor reduction;
. Zone 6: The previous study assumed that 300 medium density residential units would be
developed adjacent to the water tower along Highland Drive. However, 13 low-density units
are now proposed and approved. This would result in a significant decrease in traffic
volumes associated with the zone;
. Zone 7: It was previously proposed to develop 120 medium density residential units and a
25-suite training/conference facility. However, the residential component has been deleted
and it is now proposed to construct a 114-suite training/conference facility. The overall
change to the total zone traffic projection is expected to be negligible;
. Pedestrian linkages between the four phases of the Carriage Hills Resort development and
the Village are now proposed. This is to comprise a path, a ski-lift with download capability,
and possibly a dedicated shuttle. This would result in a minor decrease in traffic volumes
associated with these developments;
. A new area development has been has been added that was not considered within the original
study. These lands are located north of County Road 22 near 3rd Line. It is proposed to
develop 50 low density residential units; and
. In order to facilitate the development of the Horseshoe Village area, it has been proposed to
relocate some of the skier parking area from the Village to the maintenance area located
along 3rd Line. It is estimated that the lot would comprise approximately 400 spaces. Ski lift
tickets and access to the ski-runs would be available at this location. This would result in a
decrease in traffic volumes at the Village entrance on County Road 22 and an increase in
traffic volumes along 3rd Line.
The resultant concept plan for the subject lands is summarized in the following table.
February, 2003
33014950
Page 4
URS
Cole Shennan
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TRAFFIC REVIEW FOR THE
HORSESHOE VALLEY SE1TLEMENT NODE LANDS
Med Density 452 dwellin
Low Densi 95 dwellin
Low Density 66 dwellin
Hotel 359 rooms
4 Med Density 428 dwelling units
Commercial 19 000 s . ft GL
5 Med Density 75 dwellin units
61 Med Density 68 dwelling units
Low Density 729 dwelling units
Golf Course 9 holes
7 Hotel 114 rooms
New 2 Low Density 50 dwellin units
1:
2:
The 9-hole golf course expansion was recently constructed.
Lands located north of County Road 22 near 3rd Line (west of Zone 1).
February, 2003
33014950
Page 5
URS
Cole Shennan
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TRAFFIC REVIEW FOR THE
HORSESHOE VALLEY SETTLEMENT NODE LANDS
4.0 NEW SITE TRAFFIC
4.1 Revised Traffic Volumes
Based on the changes to the land use concept plan, revised traffic volumes were determined.
These were based on the trip generation rates outlined in the Traffic Assessment Report for the
Horseshoe Valley Settlement Node Lands.
However, since pedestrian linkages between the four phases of the Carriage Hills Resort
development and the Village are now proposed, the residential vehicular trip generation rate was
reduced. As reported in the study, approximately 25% of traffic is oriented towards the Village.
On that basis, it was assumed that 10% of the 25% of trips destined to the Village would now be
as pedestrians rather than vehicular. Thus, the residential trip generation for the Carriage Hills
Resort development was reduced by 10%.
The resultant trip generation for the each of the zones is summarized in the following table:
Zone 1 Sub. Total 105 83 188 -14% -29
Zone 2 Sub. Total 39 34 73 0% 0
Zone 3 Sub. Total 27 24 51 10% 5
Zone 4 Sub. Total 266 217 483 -6% -31
Zone 5 Sub. Total 17 13 30 -1% 0
Zone 6 Sub. Total 323 286 609 -30% -260
Zone 7 Sub. Total 38 30 68 1% 1
Grand Total 814 688 1,502 -17% -315
WINTER TRAFFIC 804 677 1,482 -16% -274
SUMMER TRAFFIC 784 658 1,442 -18% -315
The trip projections associated with the newly proposed low density residential uses located
north of County Road 22 near 3rd Line are summarized in the following table.
WINTER TRAFFIC
SUMMER TRAFFIC
695
676
1,520
1,481
-13%
-16%
-235
-277
825
805
Detailed trip generation calculations for each of the land uses within each zone are contained in
the Appendix.
February. 2003
33014950
URS
Page 6
Cole Shennan
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TRAFFIC REVIEW FOR THE
HORSESHOE VALLEY SE1TLEMENT NODE LANDS
The primary findings and changes, relatively to the concept plan assessed for the June 2000
study, are summarized below:
· Zone 1: The net change in traffic due to the change in uses and scale for the Village north of
County Road 22 is minor;
. Zone 4: The net change in traffic due to the change in uses and scale for the Village south of
County Road 22 is minor;
~ Zone 6: A 30% reduction in traffic is expected due to the change in development scale; and
· Total Traffic: Due to the development changes, a net decrease in traffic of about 15% is
expected for the Horseshoe Valley Settlement Node lands.
4.2 Traffic Assignment
Due to the concept plan revision wherein a parking area for skiers is proposed along 3rd Line,
there is expected to be a greater emphasis in traffic at the County Road 22/3rd Line intersection.
The site traffic associated with the parking area for skiers was assigned based on the previous
distribution of traffic for Zone 5 since the parking lot is in this zone. The amount of traffic re-
oriented from the main entrance along County Road 22 to the new parking area for skiers on 3rd
Line was based on a review of the anticipated annual ski related person visitation, vehicle
occupancy, operating day duration and a 20% hourly peaking factor.
Based on the derived trip distribution and the ultimate access configuration, site traffic for all the
traffic zones was assigned to the boundary road network. The assignment is illustrated in Figure
4-1 for the winter peak hour.
February, 2003
33014950
Page 7
URS
Cole Sherman
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TRAFFIC REVIEW FOR THE
HORSESHOE V ALLEY SETTLEMENT NODE LANDS
'"
001'-
~~4.
COUNlYROAD!lJ
L. 60
+ 207
r 0 HORSESHOE
VAU.EYROAD
I Ii V.R. ACCESS LINE
1L.32 L.7
'" <'II" I + 56 \() + 145
"'lit...... M I - M \()
~~4.1 r157 ~~.. r92
I ..,tr- ..,tr-
57J1 lSJ
61~1 - \()... 125 ~ 0\ N 0
~-~ \() 00
198': SO,
3rd LINE
+ 194
r76
23S ...
73 ,.
..,r-
oJ ..,tr-
249~ 000
0'
"'00
\() I'-
00 M
'" I'-
~~
L. 75 --
..... -,t
+0 " 60J
I
r54 mCHLAND I I 14' \() I'-
- \()
______ DRIVE '"
------
..,tr- t
I
00\- \ ALPINE
M \()
\ WAY :g~
\ ~~
'\
,..----
r 5SJ -,t
NORDIC r
t 14' '" '"
TRAIL _ M
I
-----",
'" '"
OM 00
~~4.
-----
OJ
O~
0'
L.o
+6 Lo \() +0
BASS LAKE M 0
rSO +0 SIDEROAD ~~4. rO
7 ... .., r- 100 J OJ ..,tr-
0,. OM 0'" O~ 0-0
0\ ...
0'
LO
... '" +29
\()-O
~~4. r1 DORAN ROAD
74J ..,tr-
33~ o~-
0'
L7
0 +0
M 0 \()
~~4. rO
34J "'tr-
O~ 000
0'
FIGURE 4-1
TOTAL SITE TRAFFIC
WINTER PERIOD PEAK HOUR
February, 2003
33014950
Page 8
URS
Co!e Sherman
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TRAFFIC REVIEW FOR THE
HORSESHOE VALLEY SEITLEMENT NODE LANDS
5.0 UPDATED TOTAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES
5.1 Total Future Traffic
Total future traffic volumes at the boundary road intersections are based on the sum of the future
background traffic and the site traffic. The future background traffic volumes are those depicted
in Figure 4-2 - Future Background Traffic - Winter Period P.M. Peak Hour of the Traffic
Assessment Report for the Horseshoe Valley Settlement Node Lands. Figure 5-1 illustrates the
resultant total future traffic associated with the year 2009 winter p.m. peak hour.
COUNlYROAD93 I ILV.R.ACCESS tit LINE
t.. 129 3rtl LINE It..SO t..13
,......, ~~~ :+293 '"
"'..." _514 _ 605 _ 452
-0 __ N... _
...H l,. r60 HORSESHOE r 105 .J~l,.1 r252 ~H l,. rW5
VALLEY ROAD
124J ..,t,. 655 _ ..,,. 78JI ..,t,. 30J ..,t,.
621- ~: C; ~ 153' c.. V'. 3:'.2...... I t-1 "" ~ 4~.2 - 0'. V". o;,t
oo~ N'" _ '" '"
90' _N 370 ': cr, N 140'
::~
...H
-o~
0"'-
t.. 106
_0
r 66 mCHJ.AND
DRIVE I
.. _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -."
-0-
-,...
,.",....-
/' 105J
, 14,
....t
.J~l,.
-----
oj
0-
0'
..,t,.
t
I
IALPINE
\ WAY :s ~
\ ..J~
,..----
: 58 J
N:C " 14'
-----"
"''''
_N
00'"
"'''''
....t
L.O
_8 L.2 BASS LAKE N _6
0... ...
r101 .J l,. _8 smEROAD .J~l,. rO
11_ .., ,. 139 J oj ..,t,.
0, '" ... 6- 4- "''''0
~ ...
2'
L8
~ g 0 _ 141
.J~l,. r11
L11
... ... ..... 126
'" "'-
.J~l,. r2
44J ..,t,.
200 - ...00
10'
DORAN ROAD
86J
194-
16'
..,tr-
......'"
-...'"
FIGURE 5-1
FUTURE TOTAL TRAFFIC
WINTER PERIOD
PM PEAK HOUR
February, 2003
33014950
Page 9
URS
Cole Sherman
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TRAFFIC REVIEW FOR THE
HORSESHOE VALLEY SETrLEMENT NODE LANDS
Based on a comparison of the traffic volumes in Figure 5-1 and the volumes in the comparable
figure in the previous Traffic Assessment Report for the Horseshoe Valley Settlement Node
Lands, it is evident that the projected total traffic volumes in the area are generally less than that
which was previously forecast. This is due to the diminished development scale associated with
the current concept plan.
There are a few exceptions along County Road 22 where some individual intersection turning
movements experienced a minor traffic volume increase during the peak hour. However, the
greatest single movement increase of any of these movements was only 5% and comprised only
13 vehicles.
The most notable reductions in traffic volumes were at the County Road 22 / 4th Line
intersection, wherein the northbound right turn and the westbound left turn are expected to
experience a reduction of 34-40 vehicles (about a 27-28% decrease), relatively to the increases
projected in the previously approved Traffic Assessment Report for the Horseshoe Valley
Settlement Node Lands.
5.2 Intersection Improvements
Based on a review of the projected traffic volumes, the following intersection improvements are
required:
. County Road 22 / 3rd Line:
. Exclusive eastbound right turn lane;
. Exclusive westbound left turn lane;
. Widening of the northbound approach to provide for exclusive left turn and right
turn lanes;
These intersection improvements are consistent with those identified in the previously
approved Traffic Assessment Reportfor the Horseshoe Valley Settlement Node Lands.
. County Road 22 / Horseshoe Valley Resort Entrance:
. Interim provision of underground infrastructure for signalized traffic control, such
as handwells and ducting, with signals being installed when warranted;
. Exclusive eastbound right turn lane;
. Exclusive eastbound and westbound left turn lanes;
. Exclusive northbound and southbound left turn lanes;
These intersection improvements are consistent with those identified in the previously
approved Traffic Assessment Reportfor the Horseshoe Valley Settlement Node Lands.
February, 2003
33014950
Page 10
URS
Cole Sherman
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TRAFFIC REVIEW FOR THE
HORSESHOE VALLEY SEITLEMENT NODE LANDS
. County Road 22/4th Line:
. Exclusive eastbound right turn lane;
. Exclusive eastbound and westbound left turn lanes; and
. Minor widening of the northbound approach to provide for an exclusive left turn
lane.
These intersection improvements are consistent with those identified in the previously
approved Traffic Assessment Reportfor the Horseshoe Valley Settlement Node Lands.
The above noted improvements are depicted in Figure 5-1.
HORSESHOE
VALLEY ROAD
FIGURE 5-1
IMPROVE:MENT PLAN
As noted above for each of the three intersections, no additional improvements have been
identified based on the updated traffic volumes, as compared to those outlined in the previous
Traffic Assessment Report for the Horseshoe Valley Settlement Node Lands. It should also be
noted that no improvements have been deleted.
February, 2003
33014950
Page 11
URS
Cole Sherman
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TRAFFIC REVIEW FOR THE
HORSESHOE VALLEY SETTLEMENT NODE LANDS
5.3 Operational Review
Given that the revised projected traffic volumes are generally less than those previously forecast,
with the exception of the few traffic increases at some movements, the previous operational
review and findings are still applicable.
It was reported that the analyses of total future traffic conditions reveal good overall intersection
operations and Levels of Service (LOS "C" or better). The only exceptions were the intersections
of County Road 22 with 3rd Line and with 4th Line due to northbound left turn traffic at the
intersections wherein it was expected that the movements will operate with LOS "E". Although
the delays associated with these two turning movements are higher than typically encountered in
a rural environ, they are within an acceptable range.
It should be noted that the County Road 22 intersection operations will likely be better than those
reported in the previous Traffic Assessment Report for the Horseshoe Valley Settlement Node
Lands since the base counts (that is, the existing count data) were observed during atypical
conditions, wherein there was a major event at Horseshoe Valley Resort resulting in about three
times the typical number of people at the Resort.
In summary, the boundary intersections are anticipated to operate acceptably. There is no need
for intersection or road link improvements, other than the aforementioned construction of turn
lanes and the interim provision of underground infrastructure for signalized traffic control, such
as handwells and ducting, at the County Road 22 / Horseshoe Valley Resort Entrance. Traffic
control signals would be installed when warranted.
February, 2003
33014950
Page 12
URS
Cole Sherman
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'I
I
TRAFFIC REVIEW FOR THE
HORSESHOE VALLEY SETI'LEMENT NODE LANDS
6.0 IMPROVEMENT STAGING
Generally, the identified timing for each turn lane improvement was correlated to development
of a specific number of residential units in certain zones of the Horseshoe Valley Settlement
Node lands.
6.1 County Road 22 /3d Line Intersection
The improvements at this intersection include the provision of an exclusive right turn lane on the
eastbound approach, an exclusive left turn lane on the westbound approach, and a widening of
the northbound approach to provide for an exclusive left turn lane with a separate right turn lane.
The estimated increase in traffic volumes beyond existing conditions at this intersection due to
Zone 6 land uses is in the order of 160 vehicles during the winter p.m. peak: hour (eastbound
right, westbound left, northbound left and northbound right turns). This traffic increase is about
1/3 less than the previous traffic projections in the Traffic Assessment Report due to the reduced
development scale of Zone 6. In any event, traffic generated by Zone 6 will impact the
operations of this intersection primarily, resulting in the identified improvements being
warranted due to development of these lands.
Based on the existing traffic volumes, an eastbound right turn taper is warranted. However, the
threshold volume at which point the eastbound right turn lane is warranted will be attained when
a total of approximately 350 units in Zones 5 and 6 are constructed. It is recommended that the
eastbound right turn lane be constructed at that time.
The westbound left turn lane is anticipated to be warranted when a total of approximately 300
units in Zones 5 and 6 are constructed.
In order to achieve the benefits of construction "economies-of-scale", it would be preferable to
construct the eastbound right turn lane, the westbound left turn lane, and the northbound
approach widening (to provide for an exclusive left turn lane with a separate right turn lane) at
this intersection all at the same time. Therefore, the improvements at this intersection should be
implemented simultaneously when a total of approximately 300 to 350 units are constructed in
Zones 5 and 6 (the lands adjacent to 3rd Line, HigWand Drive and Alpine Way).
The staging of these intersection improvements is consistent (i.e. unchanged) with those in the
previous Traffic Assessment Report for the Horseshoe Valley Settlement Node Lands and the
improvement phasing in the Township of Oro-Medonte's Official Plan.
6.2 County Road 22 / Horseshoe Valley Resort Entrance Intersection
The improvements at this intersection include the provision of signalized traffic control, an
exclusive eastbound right turn lane, and exclusive left turn lanes on all four approaches.
February. 2003
33014950
Page 13
URS
Cole Shennan
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TRAFFIC REVIEW FOR THE
HORSESHOE V ALLEY SETTLEMENT NODE LANDS
Based on the 1999 traffic volumes, the eastbound right turn lane is almost warranted with
existing traffic conditions. Thus, the eastbound right turn should be constructed in the short term.
This is consistent with the previous Traffic Assessment Report and the improvement phasing in
the Township of Oro-Medonte's Official Plan (which stated that the improvement should be
constructed when approximately 55 residential units are constructed in Zones 5 and 6).
The threshold volume at which point the eastbound and westbound left turn lanes on County
Road 22 are warranted would be attained if any significant development occurred in the
Horseshoe Valley Village. For example, if either the hotel or the residential uses were developed
in the Village, then the eastbound and westbound left turn lanes would be warranted. Similarly,
traffic signals would also be warranted at that time. Alternatively, the westbound left turn lane
would also be warranted if a combination of approximately 300 residential units in Zones 2, 3, 6
and 7 are constructed. The eastbound left turn lane should be constructed at the same time to take
advantage of the required widening for the westbound left turn lane.
Therefore, the eastbound right turn lane should be constructed in the short term. The construction
of the eastbound and westbound left turn lanes should be undertaken simultaneously with any
significant development in the Horseshoe Valley Village or the construction of any combination
of approximately 300 residential units located in Zones 2, 3, 6 and 7. In order to achieve the
benefits of construction "economies-of-scale", it would be preferable to construct the eastbound
and westbound left turn lanes, as well as the northbound and southbound approach throat
widenings (to provide for exclusive left turn lanes) simultaneously. The traffic signals should be
installed when there is significant development within the Horseshoe Valley Village, such as the
construction of a significant component of either the hotel uses or the residential uses in the
Horseshoe Valley Village (Zone 4). However, it is recognized that the signals should only be
installed after the need is confirmed through application of the traffic control signal installation
warrant guidelines contained in the Ministry of Transportation of Ontario's (MTO) Manual of
Uniform Traffic Control Devices.
In the year 200 1, the Resort and the County of Simcoe entered into an agreement to ensure the
provision of these road improvements at the Resort entrance. Notwithstanding the findings of the
previous Traffic Assessment Report for the Horseshoe Valley Settlement Node Lands and the
Township's Official Plan requirements, this agreement was amended in December 2002 to
require that all of the Resort entrance laning improvements, except for signalization, were to be
undertaken, or financially secured, prior to final approvals being given to the development of a
proposed 76-suite hotel expansion in the Horseshoe Valley Village. Underground infrastructure
works for the signals, such as handwells and ducting, are to be put in place for future
signalization. As outlined above, the traffic signals should be installed when the signal warrant
guidelines contained in the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices are met.
The improvement staging in the Township of Oro-Medonte's Official Plan is consistent with the
derived phasing requirements. The only exception is for the provision of the westbound left turn
lane at this intersection. The staging in the Official Plan is more rigorous than that determined in
this study (i.e. required at 250 units instead of the derived 300 units), which is now based on a
slightly reduced development yield for the Horseshoe Valley Settlement Node lands. Thus,
February, 2003
33014950
Page 14
URS
Cole Shennan
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TRAFFIC REVIEW FOR THE
HORSESHOE VALLEY SETTLEMENT NODE LANDS
adherence to the staging scenario identified in the Official Plan would result in implementation
in advance of the actual calculated need.
6.3 County Road 22 /4th Line Intersection
The improvements at this intersection include the provision of an exclusive right turn lane on the
eastbound approach, eastbound and westbound left turn lanes, and a minor widening of the
northbound approach to provide for an exclusive left turn lane with a separate right turn lane.
The estimated increase in traffic volumes beyond existing conditions at this intersection due to
Zone 6 land uses is in the order of 250 vehicles during the winter p.m. peak hour (eastbound
right, westbound left, northbound left and northbound right turns). This traffic increase is about
1/3 less than the previous traffic projections in the Traffic Assessment Report due to the reduced
development scale of Zone 6. In any event, traffic generated by Zone 6 will impact the
operations of this intersection primarily, resulting in the identified improvements being
warranted due to development of these lands.
The threshold volume at which point the eastbound right turn lane is warranted will be attained
when a total of approximately 250 units in Zones 6 and 7 are constructed.
The threshold volume at which point the westbound left turn lane is warranted will be attained
when approximately 600 more units in Zones 6 and 7 are constructed. The eastbound left turn
lane should be implemented at the same time to take advantage of the required widening for the
westbound left turn lane. In addition, it is not expected that that northbound approach throat
widening would be required until this level of development occurs. Therefore, in order to achieve
the benefits of this construction "economies-of-scale", it would be preferable to implement the
northbound approach throat widening at this intersection at the same time that the eastbound and
westbound left turn lanes are constructed.
In summary, the eastbound right turn lane should be constructed when a total of approximately
250 units are developed in Zones 6 and 7 (the lands adjacent to Highland Drive, Alpine Way and
4th Line). The construction of the eastbound and westbound left turn lanes, and the northbound
approach throat widening (to provide for an exclusive left turn lane with a separate right turn
lane) should be undertaken simultaneously with the construction of any combination of
approximately 600 residential units located in Zones 6 and 7.
The staging of these intersection improvements is consistent (i.e. unchanged) with those in the
previous Traffic Assessment Report for the Horseshoe Valley Settlement Node Lands and the
improvement phasing in the Township of Oro-Medonte's Official Plan.
6.4 Summary of Changes to the Improvement Staging
The staging of the intersection improvements was summarized in the previous Traffic
Assessment Report for the Horseshoe Valley Settlement Node Lands report. The staging
information was also reiterated in planning documentation at the Township of Oro-Medonte.
February, 2003
33014950
Page 15
URS
Cole SheOl1an
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TRAFFIC REVIEW FOR THE
HORSESHOE VALLEY SETTLEMENT NODE LANDS
Generally, the improvements and the staging is unchanged for the County Road 22 1 3rd Line and
County Road 22 14th Line intersections.
Similarily, the required improvements at the County Road 221 Horseshoe Valley Resort entrance
are unchanged.
However, the staging of the westbound left turn lane at the intersection is slightly different. In
the previous study, it was identified that the westbound left turn lane be constructed with the
combination of approximately 250 residential units located in Zones 2, 3, 6 and 7. Due to the
change in uses it is now recommended that the subject left turn lane be constructed with a
combination of approximately 300 residential units in Zones 2, 3, 6 and 7. Thus, the need for the
westbound left turn lane is somewhat diminished in comparison to the previously identified
timing.
Since the provision of the eastbound left turn lane at the County Road 22 1 Horseshoe Valley
Resort entrance is in tandem with the westbound left turn lane, the staging of this improvement is
also indirectly deferred.
Finally, the previous study identified that the signals at the County Road 221 Horseshoe Valley
Resort entrance should be installed when there is significant development within the Horseshoe
Valley Village, such as the construction of either the hotel or the commercial-retail plaza.
However, the commercial-retail plaza has been significantly reduced in scale and does not
appreciable impact the need for traffic signals. The addition of a large residential component in
Zone 4 does affect the staging. Thus, the staging of the traffic signals is still based on significant
development within the Horseshoe Valley Village, such as the construction of a large component
of either the hotel uses or the residential uses in the Horseshoe Valley Village (Zone 4).
However, it is recognized that the signals should only be installed after the need is confirmed
through application of the traffic control signal installation warrant guidelines contained in the
Ministry of Transportation of Ontario's (MTO) Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. This
is consistent with the recommendations in the previous Traffic Assessment Report, the
improvement phasing in the Township of Oro-Medonte's Official Plan, and an Agreement with
the County of Simcoe.
In summary, the improvements and the staging is unchanged. The only exception is the timing of
the westbound left turn lane at the County Road 22 1 Horseshoe Valley Resort entrance which is
now based on the development of approximately 300 residential units in Zones 2, 3, 6 and 7, as
well as the installation of traffic signals which is based on significant development within the
Horseshoe Valley Village, such as the construction of a large compDnent of either the hotel uses
or the residential uses in the Horseshoe Valley Village (Zone 4).
The improvement staging in the Township of Oro-Medonte's Official Plan is consistent with the
derived phasing requirements in this traffic review. The only exception is for the provision of the
westbound left turn lane at the County Road 22 1 Horseshoe Valley Resort entrance. The staging
in the Official Plan is more rigorous than that determined in this study (i.e. required at 250 units
instead of the derived 300 units), which is now based on a slightly reduced development yield for
February, 2003
33014950
Page 16
URS
COle Shennan
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TRAFFIC REVIEW FOR THE
HORSESHOE VALLEY SETTLEMENT NODE LANDS
the Horseshoe Valley Settlement Node lands. Thus, adherence to the staging scenario identified
in the Official Plan would result in transportation infrastructure in advance of the actual
calculated need and thereby improved network operations.
In fact, the above referenced Agreement between the Resort and the County of Simcoe ensures
that the provision of the intersection improvements at the Resort entrance are undertaken or
financially secured prior to final approvals being given to the development of the proposed 76-
suite hotel expansion in the Horseshoe Valley Village.
I
February, 2003
33014950
Page 17
URS
Co'e Shennan
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TRAFFIC REVIEW FOR THE
HORSESHOE VALLEY SEITLEMENT NODE LANDS
7.0 CONCEPT PLAN DESIGN
The planning and design of the concept plan for the development of the Horseshoe Valley
Settlement Node lands should be based on good transportation planning principles. This would
include consideration of the following:
. Internal road laning and intersection requirements
. Primary and secondary/emergency access
. Parking provisions and layout
. Vehicular circulation
. Pedestrian desire-lines and provisions
. Golf cart routing and provisions
. Truck routes, loading mobility and access
. Maintenance vehicles (i.e. snow vehicle) and snow storage
February, 2003
33014950
Page 18
URS
COle Sherman
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TRAFFIC REVIEW FOR THE
HORSESHOE V ALLEY SETTLEMENT NODE LANDS
8..0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
In June 2000, URS Cole Shennan & Associates Ltd. prepared the final Traffic Assessment
Report for the Horseshoe Valley Settlement Node Lands for the Horseshoe Resort Corporation.
However, since the preparation of the study, the development concept for the subject lands have
been refined somewhat. Due to these changes, a follow-up traffic review was undertaken to
fievelop revised traffic projections, review the need for road and intersection improvements, and
document the staging of the improvements.
Based on the updated development infonnation, the pnmary findings pertaining to trip
generation are summarized below:
· Zone 1: The net change in traffic due to the change in uses and scale for the Village north of
County Road 22 is minor;
· Zone 4: The net change in traffic due to the change in uses and scale for the Village south of
County Road 22 is minor;
· Zone 6: A 30% reduction in traffic is expected due to the change in development scale; and
· Total Traffic: Due to the development changes, a net decrease in traffic of about 15% is
expected for the Horseshoe Valley Settlement Node lands.
Based on a comparison of the updated total traffic volumes for the previous and updated concept
plans, it was determined that the projected total traffic volumes in the area are generally less than
that which was previously proposed. This is due to the diminished development scale associated
with the current concept plan.
The boundary intersections are anticipated to operate acceptably. There is no need for additional
intersection or road link improvements based on the updated traffic volumes, as compared to
those outlined in the previous Traffic Assessment Report for the Horseshoe Valley Settlement
Node Lands report. It should also be noted that no improvements have been deleted.
The following is a list of the recommended intersection improvements:
· County Road 22 /3rd Line Intersection: the provision of an exclusive right turn lane on
the eastbound approach, an exclusive left turn lane on the westbound approach, and a
widening of the northbound approach to provide for an exclusive left turn lane with a
separate right turn lane.
In order to achieve the benefits of construction "economies-of-scale", it would be
preferable to construct the eastbound right turn lane, the westbound left turn lane, and the
northbound approach widening (to provide for an exclusive left turn lane with a separate
right turn lane) at this intersection all at the same time. Therefore, the improvements at
this intersection should be implemented simultaneously when a total of approximately
300 to 350 units are constructed in Zones 5 and 6 (the lands adjacent to 3rd Line,
Highland Drive and Alpine Way);
February. 2003
33014950
Page 19
URS
Co!e Sherman
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TRAFFIC REVIEW FOR THE
HORSESHOE VALLEY SEITLEMENT NODE LANDS
· County Road 22 I Horseshoe Valley Resort Entrance Intersection: provision of signalized
traffic control, exclusive eastbound right turn lane, and exclusive left turn lanes on all
four approaches.
The eastbound right turn lane should be constructed in the short term. The construction of
the eastbound and westbound left turn lanes should be undertaken simultaneously with
any significant development in the Horseshoe Valley Village or the construction of any
combination of approximately 300 residential units located in Zones 2, 3, 6 and 7. In
order to achieve the benefits of construction "economies-of-scale", it would be preferable
to construct the eastbound and westbound left turn lanes, as well as the northbound and
southbound approach throat widenings (to provide for exclusive left turn lanes)
simultaneously. The traffic signals should be installed when there is significant
development within the Horseshoe Valley Village, such as the construction of a
significant component of either the hotel uses or the residential uses in the Horseshoe
Valley Village (Zone 4). However, it is recognized that the signals should only be
installed after the need is confirmed through application of the traffic control signal
installation warrant guidelines contained in the Ministry of Transportation of Ontario's
(MTO) Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices.
The Resort and the County of Simcoe have entered into an Agreement to ensure the
provision of these intersection improvements at the Resort entrance, requiring that all of
the Resort entrance laning improvements, except for signalization, be undertaken, or
financially secured, prior to final approvals being given to the development of a proposed
76-suite hotel expansion in the Horseshoe Valley Village. Underground infrastructure
works for the signals, such as handwells and ducting, are to be put in place for future
signalization. As noted above, the signals would be installed after the need is confirmed
through application of the warrant guidelines contained in the Manual of Uniform Traffic
Control Devices.
· County Road 22 14th Line: provision of an exclusive eastbound right turn lane, eastbound
and westbound left turn lanes, and a minor widening of the northbound approach to
provide for an exclusive left turn lane with a separate right turn lane.
The eastbound right turn lane should be constructed when a total of approximately 250
units are developed in Zones 6 and 7 (the lands adjacent to Highland Drive, Alpine Way
and 4th Line). The construction of the eastbound and westbound left turn lanes, and the
northbound approach throat widening (to provide for an exclusive left turn lane with a
separate right turn lane) should be undertaken simultaneously with the construction of
any combination of approximately 600 residential units located in Zones 6 and 7.
In summary, the improvements and the staging are unchanged. The only exception is the timing
of the westbound left turn lane at the County Road 22 / Horseshoe Valley Resort entrance which
is now based on the development of approximately 300 residential units (as opposed to the 250
units identified in the previous Traffic Assessment Report) in Zones 2, 3, 6 and 7, as well as the
installation of traffic signals which is now based on significant development within the
Horseshoe Valley Village, such as the construction of a large component of either the hotel uses
or the residential uses in the Horseshoe Valley Village (Zone 4).
February, 2003
33014950
Page 20
URS
Go!e Sherman
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TRAFFIC REVIEW FOR THE
HORSESHOE VALLEY SETTLEMENT NODE LANDS
The improvement staging in the Township of Oro-Medonte's Official Plan is consistent with the
derived phasing requirements in this traffic review. The only exception is for the provision of the
westbound left turn lane at the County Road 22 / Horseshoe Valley Resort entrance. The staging
in the Official Plan is more rigorous than that determined in this study (Le. required at 250 units
instead of the derived 300 units), which is now based on a slightly reduced development yield for
the Horseshoe Valley Settlement Node lands. Thus, adherence to the staging scenario identified
in the Official Plan would result in transportation infrastructure in advance of the actual
calculated need and thereby improved network operations.
In fact, the above referenced Agreement between the Resort and the County of Simcoe ensures
that the provision of the intersection improvements at the Resort entrance are undertaken or
financially secured prior to final approvals being given to the development of the proposed 76-
suite hotel expansion in the Horseshoe Valley Village.
Since the development scale is reduced from that which was previously modeled and also since
the Resort is not pursuing a change to the identified intersection improvements (or staging), an
updated comprehensive traffic assessment report is not required.
February, 2003
33014950
Page 21
URS
Co!" Sherman
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TRAFFIC REVIEW FOR THE
HORSESHOE VALLEY SEITLEMENT NODE LANDS
APPENDIX 1
DETAILED TRIP GENERATION
February, 2003
33014950
URS
Cole Shennan
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
~dI
0<:1'
~j
O.
'"
8
w Hotel o rooms 0.60 5.3% 56% 44% 0.32 0.25 0.57 0 0 0
Med Densit 452 dwellin units 0.44 5.3% 56% 44% 0.23 0.18 0.42 105 83 188
2 Low Density A 35 dwelling units 0.77 Or. 53% 47% 0.41 0.36 0.77 14 13 27
Low Densit B 60 dwellin units 0.77 0% 53% 47% 0.41 0,36 0.77 24 22 46
3 Low Densit 66 dwellin units 0.77 0% 53% 47% 0.41 0.36 0.77 27 24 51
Hotel 359 rooms 0.60 5.3% 56% 44% 0.32 0.25 0.57 114 90 204
Med Density 428 dwelling units 0.44 0% 56% 44% 0.25 0.19 0.44 105 83 188
4 Skiing first principles 16 16 32
Tubing first principales 14 14 28
Commercial 19000 sq. II GLA 4.97 67% 52% 48% 0.85 0.79 1.64 16 15 31
Golf Course holes 2.30 0% 49% 51% 1.13 1.17 2.30 0 0 0
5 Med Densit * 75 dwellin units 0.40 0% 56% 44% 0.22 0.17 0.40 17 13 30
Med Density A 34 dwelling units 0.40 0% 56% 44% 0.22 0.17 0.40 8 6 13
Med Density B 34 dwelling units 0.40 0% 56% 44% 0.22 0.17 0.40 8 6 13
Low Density C 13 dwelling units 0.77 0'% 53% 47% 0.41 0.36 0.77 5 5 10
6 Low Density A 116 dwelling units 0.77 0% 53% 47% 0.41 0.36 0.77 47 42 89
Low Density B 565 dwelling units 0.77 0% 53% 47% 0.41 0.36 0.77 231 204 435
Low Density C 35 dwelling units 0.77 0% 53% 47% 0.41 0.36 0.77 14 13 27
Golf Course 9 holes 2.30 0% 49% 51 % 1.13 1.17 2.30 10 11 21
7 Hotel 114 rooms 0.60 0% 56% 44% 0.34 0.26 0.60 38 30 68
Med Densit dwellin units 0.44 0% 56% 44% 0.25 0.19 0.44 0 0 0
Zone 1 Sub-Total 105 83 188 -14% -29
Zone 2 Sub-Total 39 34 73 0% 0
rooms Zone 3 Sub-Total 27 24 51 10% 5
Med Density 1 dwelling units 0.44 at 56% 44% Zone 4 Sub-Total 266 217 483 .6% .31
Low Density A 1 dwelling units 0.77 at 53% 47% Zone 5 Sub-Total 17 13 30 -1% 0 b::
Commercial 1 000 sq. II GLA 4.97 at 52% 48% Zone 6 Sub-Total 323 286 609 .30% -260 ~
Golf Course 1 holes 2.30 at 49% 51% Zone 7 Sub.Total 38 30 68 1% 1 ~
Grand Total 814 688 1502 .17% -315 ~
804 677 1482 ~
* Reduced trip rate by 10% to account for some walk-in traffic WINTER TRAFFIC ~
SUMMER TRAFFIC 784 658 1442 ~
50 dwelling units 53% 47% 0.41 0.36 0.77 20 18 39 ~
o holes 49% 51% 1.13 1.17 2.30 0 0 0 ~~
~~
WINTER TRAFFIC 825 695 1520
m SUMMER TRAFFIC 805 676 1481 ~ (::;
~~
~~
g g ~
0 l'!j ~
(f) ~~
::1'
tV
:3
!>) ~ ~
:;;
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
12 Bram Court, Unit 18
I Brampton, Ontario L6W 3V1
(905) 796-2650 Fax 796-2250
Consulting Geotechnical & Environmental Engineering
Construction Materials Engineering, Inspection & Testing
HYDROGEOLOGIC ASSESSMENT
HORSESHOE RESORT
COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
Prepared For:
Horseshoe Resort
c/o PK Menzies Planning and Development Inc.
115 Porkside Drive
R.R.2
Hawkstone, Ontario
LOL 1 TO
Attention:
Ms. Kris Menzies, MCIP, RPP
File No. 3-02-0863
February 26, 2003
C) TerrClprobe Limited
Distribution:
7 cc: PK Menzies Planning & Development Inc.
2 cc Terraprobe Limited
Terraprobe Limited
220 Bayview Drive, Unit 25 1012 Kelly Lake Road, Unit 1
Barrie, Ontario L4N 7T3 Sudbury, Ontario P3E 5P4
(705) 739-8355 Fax 739-8369 (705) 670-0460 Fax 670-0558
wwwJerraprobe.ca
903 Barton Street, Unit 22
Stoney Creek, Ontario L8E 5P5
(905) 643-7560 Fax 643-7559
1-800-465-2066
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Horseshoe Resort Comprehensive Development Plan
Horseshoe Resort
February 26, 2003
File No. 3-02-0863
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARy..................................................... 2
2. INTRODUCTION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 5
3. DEFINITION OF STUDY AREA AND PURPOSE.................................. 5
4. GEOLOGY AND PHYSIOGRAPHY ............................................. 6
5. HYDROGEOLOGY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 8
5.1 Study Area Overview. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 8
5.2 Recharge and Discharge Features .......................................... 8
5.3 Water Budget ........................................................ 11
5.4 Copeland Forest ...................................................... 12
6. WATER SUPPLY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 13
6.1 Current Wells. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 13
6.2 Existing Permits to Take Water. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 15
6.3 Existing Water Requirements ............................................ 17
6.4 Existing Water Quality ................................................. 17
6.5 Anticipated Additional Water Demands. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 18
6.6 Anticipated Impact to Aquifer from Additional Taking ........................ 19
7. EFFLUENT TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL..................................... 20
7.1 Overview of Existing Treatment and Disposal System ........................ 20
7.2 Anticipated Additional Effluent to be Generated ............................. 21
7.3 Discussion of Treatment and Disposal Options ......................,....... 22
7.4 Treatment and Spray Irrigation ........................................... 23
7.5 Impact to Groundwater ................................................ 24
8.0 REFERENCES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 28
Figures 1.
2.
3.
4.
5&6
Site Location Plan
Proposed Concept Plan
Regional Quaternary Geology
Well Location Plan
Hydrogeologic Crossections
Appendix A
Appendix B
Appendix C
MOE Well Records
Existing Permits to Take Water
Development Model
I
Horseshoe Resort Comprehensive Development Plan
Horseshoe Resort
February 26, 2003
File No. 3-02-0863
I
I
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Terraprobe Limited was retained by the Horseshoe Resort development group, to provide hydrogeologic
services associated with the preparation of a Comprehensive Development Plan as outlined in the Township
of Oro-Medonte Official Plan. A comprehensive proposed development scheme for the Horseshoe Resort
area has been provided and is the basis of our hydrogeologic assessment. Due to the fact that hydrogeologic
constraints, in particular groundwater recharge/discharge impact and impact to the environment, are often
considered beyond the boundaries of specific development areas, we have elected to consider the entire
Horseshoe Valley Settlement Node area in our hydrogeologic assessment and consider the combined
communal impact of the existing and proposed development within this area.
I
I
I
I
The hydrogeologic features of this study area have been discussed in our report as well as a summary of the
current water supply systems and sewage treatment and disposal systems.
I
A preliminary analysis and discussion are then taken with respect to incorporating the new proposed
developments with the current systems including the aspects of golf course irrigation, snow making and
existing Certificates of Approval and Permits to Take Water.
I
I
I
Servicing feasibility for the proposed development will ultimately be a comprehensive plan that incorporates
the existing groundwater taking and effluent disposal with new phased or staged development. It is
envisioned the future development will be progressive and somewhat defined with the assistance of
additional studies, new technologies and monitoring of water use, sewage generation and groundwater
impact.
I
I
In summary, our review addresses the following main items and/or conclusions.
I
a)
The existing upper to intermediate groundwater aquifer system below Horseshoe Resort will
be suitable to sustain the proposed future development.
I
b)
The proposed new development will need to be serviced with a new sewage treatment plant
and likely a combination of various sewage effluent disposal options which will include
further exfiltration cells, spray irrigation, enhanced evaporation technologies, snow making
using treated effluent, and more traditional effluent infiltration techniques.
I
I
I
I
~ir-
Page No. I
I
I
I
Horseshoe Resort Comprehensive Development Plan
Horseshoe Resort
February 26, 2003
File No. 3-02-0863
c) The combination of state-of-the-art effluent treatment and innovative combined disposal
options will ensure that an acceptable impact of the environment will occur.
d)
Integration of Best Management Stormwater Management Practices to maintain or enhance
current infiltration of stormwater will aid and ensure that there is minimal impact to the
shallow groundwater table.
I
I
I
e)
It is anticipated that the use of spray irrigation technology and some snow making using
treated effluent will substantially reduce the current permitted requirement for taking
groundwater for these purposes which will help offset requirements for new water taking
for the proposed developments.
I
I
I
f) The proposed water taking requirements and ultimately the treatment of effluent IS
anticipated to be approximately 2.6 times what the current development uses.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
g) The hydrogeology for the Horseshoe Valley Settlement Node indicates that there is a
shallow groundwater table that flows northward from beneath the upper highland area and
discharges as shallow surface water into the Copeland Forest. Only a small section around
the west edge of Carriage Hill Resort Phase 4 has shallow intermittent flow northwestward
into the Matheson Creek Watershed.
h) The upper and intermediate aquifers that are the major groundwater aquifers beneath the
moraine also flow northward with discharge into the Coldwater River several kilometres
north of Horseshoe Valley Resort but are anticipated to provide some discharge up into the
Copeland Forest.
i) State-of-the-art technologies will be reviewed and assessed with respect to treatment of the
effluent to ensure that it can be adequately either exfiltrated, spray irrigated, used for snow
making or infiltrated on the subject property to meet health concerns and minimize impact
with respect to surface and groundwater.
j) The cumulative groundwater and sewage disposal requirements for the Horseshoe Valley
Settlement Node area, which includes the Comprehensive Development Plan area can be
I
~ Ton_
Page No.2
I
I
I
Horseshoe Resort Comprehensive Development Plan
Horseshoe Resort
February 26,2003
File No. 3-02-0863
I
I
I
accommodated using a combination of disposal options. The options used and the triggers
for requirements for improvement to the infrastructure will be tied in directly with the
phasing or staging of the developments and may be contingent ultimately on monitoring of
both use and impact as the developments proceed. This type of approach is beneficial in
that it allows for appropriate changes in the infrastructure to make it financially viable as
well as suitably minimizes the impact to the environment using the most advanced
technologies.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~ T_'"
Page No.3
I
I
I
Horseshoe Resort Comprehensive Development Plan
Horseshoe Resort
February 26, 2003
File No. 3-02-0863
2. INTRODUCTION
I
I
I
I
Terraprobe was retained by the Horseshoe Resort development group, to provide a hydrogeologic assessment
for the proposed development plan in conjunction with the requirements ofthe Comprehensive Development
Plan (CDP) prescribed in the Township ofOro-Medonte Official Plan. We are working with other technical
groups in order to identify physical and hydrogeologic constraints that we will need to address later in the
design process in order to achieve the proposed development plan.
Terraprobe met with the design team on a number of occasions to develop and provide an understanding of
the direction of the proposed project. As well, we have reviewed previous reports prepared both by ourselves
and other consultants on the Oro-Moraine and in particular current reports and Draft Reports by Azimuth
Environmental Consulting Inc. that have been prepared for the Township ofOro-Medonte as part of their
long-term planning strategy.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
In order to provide a preliminary assessment of the amount of effluent that may be generated from the
proposed development and in turn the amount of groundwater taking that may be required, we have
developed a rough understanding of the types of units that are being proposed for development and made a
reasonable estimate with respect to water use and sewage generation. These are approximate but are
considered appropriate at this early conceptual design stage in order to put in perspective the type of
servicing which may have to be considered from a hydrogeologic perspective. We have also had the
opportunity on a few occasions to meet with members of American Water Systems (A WS) Engineering and
Planning to better understand their current treatment plant! exfiltration system and the capacity which can
be handled and/or expanded upon. A WS is the owner and operator of Horseshoe's Sequential Batch Reactor
(SBR) sewage treatment facility.
I
I
In our study we have provided a comprehensive review of the hydrogeology for the Horseshoe Valley
Settlement Node area in order to understand the pathways and receptors for contaminants to the environment
and to understand the aquifers from which groundwater will be taken. We have also incorporated into our
review an understanding of the current golf course irrigation and snow making facilities as we believe these
will be integrated into the overall solution with respect to groundwater taking and effluent disposal.
I
I
I
_T_
Page No.4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Horseshoe Resort Comprehensive Development Plan
Horseshoe Resort
February 26,2003
File No. 3-02-0863
We have reviewed existing Permits to take Water (PTTW) that are in place for the water systems currently
used within the Horseshoe Valley Settlement Node area and have some information with respect to the
current actual water taking and the existing groundwater quality.
In our study we have also undertaken an examination of the type of treatment and disposal systems that we
feel would be feasible to consider for the proposed development and we provide some overview discussion.
Based on the overall assumptions and our understanding of the overall hydrogeology and water cycle for the
Horseshoe Valley Resort area we have also carried forward with some discussion on potential impacts to the
environment and have provided review and discussion on how these impacts can be mitigated and/or dealt
with as the development proceeds.
I
I
I
I
Sufficient information has been presented to provide confidence that solutions can be developed. Further
investigation and studies will be required to obtain final approvals, Certificates of Approval and Permits to
Take Water along with fairly comprehensive review and discussion with regulatory agencies such as the
Ministry of Environment and the Ministry of Natural Resources. We anticipate that the Township ofOro-
Medonte and their review agencies will also be actively involved with this process to ensure that the concerns
of all parties are adequately addressed.
3. DEFINITION OF STUDY AREA AND PURPOSE
I
I
I
Terraprobe has been retained by the Horseshoe Resort development group, as a team member to address the
hydrogeologic conditions outlined in the Township of Oro-Medonte Official Plan with respect to a
Comprehensive Development Plan (CDP). The Comprehensive Development Plan geographic limits are
primarily within the lower valley of the Horseshoe Resort land holdings and delineated and referred to as the
Horseshoe Valley Village designation in the Township's Official Plan.
I
I
I
I
I
The hydrogeologic aspects that are required to be addressed in this CDP focus around the "form of servicing"
(Subsection E2.5.3.2A of the Official Plan) and the "impact of the new development on the groundwater
recharge function" (Subsection E2.5.3.2H).
iiT-
Page No.5
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Horseshoe Resort Comprehensive Development Plan
Horseshoe Resort
February 26, 2003
File No. 3-02-0863
The proposed Concept Plan, as appended to this report, outlines the proposed development within this CDP
and shows existing and/or approved development in the larger encompassing Settlement Node area. The
proposed Timber Ridge Subdivision (ie: north limits of area) does extend beyond the limits of the CDP and
is separate from the Timber Ridge Clusters that are proposed within the CDP.
In order to address the hydrogeologic issues of servicing and impact to groundwater recharge/discharge, it
is important to consider the surrounding current land uses and proposed uses which are defined within the
larger envelope defined as the Horseshoe Valley Settlement Node from a planning perspective. As well, it
is important to consider the immediate adjoining property to the north which is the Copeland Forest. The
Copeland Forest will be the primary receiver of any groundwater impacts that will be incurred by
development within the Comprehensive Development Plan as well as within the Horseshoe Valley Settlement
Node. Therefore, this hydrogeologic assessment is more encompassing in order to provide a more holistic
impact assessment.
The purpose of this hydrogeologic assessment is to provide confidence to the Municipality that the form of
development and the associated servicing can be accomplished. More detailed studies and assessments are
anticipated and in many cases will be required to obtain approvals and permits from the Township, the
Ministry of Natural Resources and the Ministry of the Environment. In this regard, this level of assessment
is not intended to be a comprehensive hydrogeologic assessment that technically addresses quantitatively all
the issues. It is provided as an overview to define the issues which will need to be addressed and has been
advanced to a point where feasibility of the development is demonstrated.
4. GEOLOGY AND PHYSIOGRAPHY
The site lies within the Physiographic Region referred to as the Simcoe Uplands.
The Simcoe Uplands occupy most of the former Township ofOro and part of the Township ofMedonte. The
Oro Moraine portion of the Simcoe Uplands is the most significant topographic feature within the Township.
The moraine is located generally between, County Road 11 and the Horseshoe Valley Road and from
Highway 93 to just south of Bass Lake. The moraine is the result of deposition of till, glacial lacustrine
sediments and glacial fluvial sand and gravel. Chapman and Putnam (1984) described the Oro-Moraine as
an interlobate formation, possibly the result of a split between two ice lobes. It could also be a sandy
moraine built earlier by a Georgian Bay lobe and over ridden by the last advance of the glacier.
~T_
Page No.6
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Horseshoe Resort Comprehensive Development Plan
Horseshoe Resort
February 26, 2003
File No. 3-02-0863
This highland area is underlain by bedrock of the Middle Ordovician age. Bedrock is described as the
Trenton and Black River Groups (unsubdivided) comprised of limestone, minor dolostone and shale.
The depth to bedrock is mapped for the area using MOE Well Records. A few wells are drilled through the
moraine to the bedrock indicating that it is encountered approximately 200m below the top of the site or
around elevation 150 to 185m.
A regional Quaternary Geology map is presented on Figure 3. A significant portion of the area to the south
and east of the site as shown on the Quaternary Geology map indicates an area ofhummochy topography or
area of extensive kettles. This is generally the area outlined by T erraprobe (1995) and Azimuth (2001) as
the recharge area of the Oro-Moraine.
More specifically, the Horseshoe Valley Settlement Node encompasses a uniquely shaped land fonnation
on the northwest side of the Ora-Moraine. The horseshoe or 'u' shaped valley opens to the northwest with
the majority of the moraine located to the south and east. The CDP area is therefore outside this Oro Moraine
Recharge area.
I
I
The Valley walls are steep sided and surface elevations fall from about 400m on the upper lands to the south
to approximately 280 to 290m at the northern property boundary. The lands to the north of the Horseshoe
Valley Settlement Node further into the Copeland Forest property are generally flat and poorly drained.
I
I
I
I
I
Quaternary Geology mapping (see Figure 3) defines the upper lands around the valley and the valley slopes
as being glaciofluvial ice-contact stratified sediments, specifically fine to very coarse-grained sand, gravelly
sand and gravel, with minor amounts of silt, clay and flow till. Within the valley, the mapping identifies
localized areas of clayey silt to silt till as well as glacio lacustrine fine-grained clay and silt rhythmites.
I
I
The more predominant valley floor deposits on the site and to the northwest into Copeland Forest are shown
to be fluvial or deltaic sediments being very fine to coarse-grained sand with minor gravel, silt and clay, and
further to the northwest glaciolacustrine coarse-grained sediments being very fine to medium-grained sand,
silt with minor clay. Significant areas of the Copelands Forest area northwest of Horseshoe Valley have also
been shown to have wetland sediments including peat, muck and marl.
~ir'"-
Page No.7
I
I
I
Horseshoe Resort Comprehensive Development Plan
Horseshoe Resort
February 26, 2003
File No. 3-02-0863
I
I
I
I
I
A small portion of the Horseshoe Valley Settlement Node, in the southwest, is identified as a moderately
stony to stony, silty sand to sand till soil. Some historic aggregate extraction has occurred in this deposit in
the past as shown on Figure 3.
5. HYDROGEOLOGY
5.1 Study Area Overview
Currently available MOE Well Records (see Appendix A) were reviewed for the area and a table of the
records reviewed is appended. In addition, a Well Location Plan has been prepared as shown on Figure 4
with select wells plotted. Hydrogeologic Cross Sections were then drawn as shown on Figures 5 and 6.
I
I
The Oro-Moraine in which the study area is situated is a physical feature within the Township of Ora-
Medonte which presents an interesting and complex hydrogeologic regime. Several main groundwater
aquifers have been identified as well as six (6) main watersheds with base flow to streams originating from
the point of groundwater aquifer discharge around the outer edges of the moraine.
I
I
I
I
I
A shallow groundwater table appears to be present under the subject property. Test holes advanced by
Wilson in 1986 indicate that the water table is 56m below grade in the upper lands in a sand deposit and
about 3m below grade at and north of Horseshoe Valley Road. However, there appears not to be use of this
water table zone for water taking purposes in the development area. More specifically, the cross sections
indicate an upper and intermediate confined aquifer complex, both located near the base of the moraine.
5.2 Recharge and Discharge Features
I
I
Azimuth (200 I) have roughly delineated the significant recharge and discharge areas within the Oro-Moraine
boundary. In the area of the Horseshoe Valley Settlement Node, and more specifically the Comprehensive
Development Plan Area, Azimuth's work and the current Official Plan would roughly suggest that the lands
in the upper table land above Horseshoe Valley Resort are considered to be within the recharge area while
the lands in the valley and north of Horseshoe Valley Road are not specifically identified. The
Comprehensive Development Plan area (Horseshoe Village) is north of the recharge boundary. Based on
the detailed hydrogeologic information available for the Horseshoe Valley Settlement Node, this is correct
but respecting the fact that some recharge will still occur to the shallow water table in the valley with
evidence of discharge occurring near the north property boundary.
I
I
I
~T__
Page No.8
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Horseshoe Resort Comprehensive Development Plan
Horseshoe Resort
February 26, 2003
File No. 3-02-0863
Unconfined Groundwater Table
Based on previous investigations within the Horseshoe Valley Settlement Node by Terraprobe and others,
the local groundwater table (above the upper and intermediate confined aquifers) appears to have a
significant horizontal hydraulic gradient component to the north as the water levels tend to follow the drop
in elevation of the surface topography. At the south end of the Settlement Node, the groundwater table
elevation has been recorded in the range of elevation 330 to 340m, while at Horseshoe Valley Road a
groundwater level of 303m was encountered and dropped to an elevation of 265 to 272m near the northern
property boundary.
Small ponds connected with a narrow water course observed in the Valley Golf Course likely represents a
shallow water table discharge that then flows into the Copeland Forest.
I
I
I
I
I
Based on the elevations discussed above, the recorded pieziometric levels in nearby wells (as shown on
Figures 5 and 6) and the ground surface /water level of the Copeland Forest, we anticipate that as the
groundwater approaches the northern property boundary some portion of the unconfined groundwater table
and the upper aquifer may converge and will be discharged to surface water in the Copeland Forest while
other waters from the upper and intermediate aquifers will flow further northward to provide base flow to
the headwaters of the Coldwater River due in part to an upward gradient. It is anticipated that initial form
of discharge to surface water occurs within the Copeland Forest Wetland areas.
Upper Aquifer
I
I
I
I
I
The water bearing zone of the upper aquifer is found locally at elevations between approximately 260 and
290m above sea level. This zone is found at depths in the order of 50 to 100m below the site and is described
as a sand to sand and gravel. Static water levels in wells completed in this zone located in the moraine area
are located fairly deep usually between 80 and 100m below ground surface. This aquifer is considered to
be semi-confined. There are primarily unconfined sand deposits for the upper approximately 60m of the site
followed by intermittent sand layers, silt and small clay layers at the top ofthis upper aquifer. The variability
in this aquifer in terms of being confined or unconfined is common across the entire Township within and
beneath the Oro-Moraine. Review of the well information in the site area suggests that this upper aquifer
may be partially interconnected with the intermediate aquifer with portions of both providing base flow to
tributaries of the Coldwater River originating in the Copeland Forest.
i8 T__
Page No.9
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Horseshoe Resort Comprehensive Development Plan
Horseshoe Resort
February 26, 2003
File No. 3-02-0863
Groundwater flow in this upper overburden aquifer radiates outwards in all directions from the central
portion of the Oro-Moraine. Flow directions are similar to surface topography with groundwater flow on
the north side of the moraine flowing towards creeks and rivers draining eventually into Georgian Bay.
Groundwater on the south flank of the moraine flows towards creeks emptying into Lake Simcoe. The
infonnation available suggests that flow direction below the CDP and most of the Horseshoe Valley
Settlement Node would be northward towards discharge into the Coldwater Watershed and eventually the
Coldwater River through tributaries originating in the Copeland Forest.
Intermediate Aquifer
The top of the water bearing zone of the immediate aquifer was generally encountered at elevations between
220 and 260m above sea level. The upper elevation of this aquifer in this area suggests that it may be locally
interconnected with the upper aquifer. This is further supported by the measured piezometric surface in the
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
area.
Flow within this intennediate aquifer is similar to that of the upper aquifer in that flow radiates in all
directions. The water system for the existing Horseshoe Valley Resort which is also the system which would
be utilized for these proposed developments is in this intennediate aquifer (i.e. Well 3 - ill #22).
The existing Heights Well (ID #59) used for snow making located on the north side of Horseshoe Valley
Road is also in this aquifer. The "Municipal Well" currently operated by the Township (ID #24) is also
believed to be in the aquifer.
We would anticipate that both the upper and intennediate aquifers supply surface water and/or base flow to
tributaries of the Coldwater River via the Copeland Forest. Prior pump testing and the Hydrogeologic Cross
Sections suggest that there would be some hydraulic connection between them.
As partially discussed above, the majority of wells in the area of the site are advanced to the upper or
intennediate aquifer zones. The intennediate aquifer supports the high capacity communal water system for
the Horseshoe Valley Resort and also the upper aquifer supplies the Edgar Adult Education Centre some
2.5km further to the southwest. These aquifers have been proven to be excellent reliable yielders for
groundwater supplies.
Ii T....,...
Page No. 10
I
Horseshoe Resort Comprehensive Development Plan
Horseshoe Resort
February 26, 2003
File No, 3-02-0863
I
5.3
Water Budget
I
An important aspect of assessing impact to groundwater and surface water in rural areas is to consider the
water budget. A water budget considers the amount of precipitation that falls on the property and attempts
to assess the percentages which evapotranspirate, run off and/or infiltrate into the ground. In essence, it's
a measure of the water cycle in the given area. Water budgets can be carried out on a site specific area basis,
but as well as on a larger watershed area basis.
I
I
I
Terraprobe has carried out extensive similar water budget assessments in the Township ofOro-Medonte in
recent years. Information from Environment Canada and nearby meteorological stations are used to carry
out this assessment along with information provided by local experience. There is evidence that suggests
that higher levels of precipitation occur on the Oro-Moraine than what might be indicated from
meteorological stations that are located around the peripheral of the moraine particularly in Barrie, Orillia,
Midhurst and Coldwater.
I
I
I
In review of our previous experience, as well as the review of the Hydrogeologic Study of the Oro-Moraine,
Township ofOro-Medonte, prepared by Azimuth Environmental Consulting Inc., dated February 2001, an
annual precipitation rate in the order of 976mm/yr and likely more can be considered reasonable for the
Horseshoe Valley area and the moraine in general. The water budget carried out by Azimuth Environmental
Consulting Inc., suggests an evapotranspiration rate of approximately 509mm/yr. We would concur that this
is reasonable and is likely accurate within 10%. It ties in relatively well with similar values throughout
Southwestern Ontario. The remaining water of 467mm/annum made up of both snow and rain is then divided
between run off and infiltration.
I
I
I
I
The actual split achieved is dependent on a number of factors including the slope ofthe ground, vegetative
cover and the permeability of the receiving soil. In general, steeper slopes usually result in greater run off
and sandier soils encourage more infiltration. An infiltration value between 177mm to 230mm can
realistically can be considered for the CDP /Horseshoe Valley area. It is important to note that infiltration
can be enhanced using stormwater management techniques where water can be collected and reintroduced
to the ground via infiltration ponds, storm ponds and the like to actually help in terms of infiltrating more
water.
I
I
I
I
I
I
_ -....
Page No. II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Horseshoe Resort Comprehensive Development Plan
Horseshoe Resort
February 26,2003
File No. 3-02-0863
A comprehensive detailed water budget for the Horseshoe Valley Settlement Node area has not been carried
out at this point. It would be difficult to do that without providing very detailed consideration of the type
of development and surface water stormwater integration which will need to be considered in the overall
development plan. However, given the sandy nature of the soil conditions both in the upper defined
"recharge area" as well as in the sandy soils also encountered in the valley area, there is considerable
opportunity for enhancing infiltration across the entire Horseshoe Valley Settlement area. This can result in
an average infiltration rate in excess of 200mm/yr. Maintaining and enhancing infiltration minimizes the
impact to groundwater aquifers, surface water features and also maintains or enhances the recharge to the
shallow groundwater table.
A series of stormwater ponds complimented with other localized infiltration techniques are being currently
considered for the Comprehensive Development Plan
5.4 Copeland Forest
The Copeland Forest Resource Management Area covers a large tract of land immediately down gradient
and north of the Horseshoe Valley Settlement area. It is a provincially owned tract of land that includes a
wetland which drains in a northerly direction towards the Coldwater River. The entire parcel measures
approximately 7km in an east west direction and approximately 2.5km in a north south direction.
Currently, Horseshoe Valley Resort has an agreement with the Province to operate a number of cross county
ski trails within the property. There are also numerous tributaries developed within the Copeland Forest that
extend northward towards the Coldwater River. A small tributary extends from the golf course in the
Horseshoe Valley Resort property through a series of small ponds discharging into the forest as well. These
ponds and streams on the Horseshoe property as discussed previously, represent shallow groundwater
discharge from the upper water table and would also collect surface water from the property.
Portions of The Copeland Forest is considered a provincially significant wetland. This wetland will receive
surface water and shallow groundwater discharge from a large area well beyond the boundaries of Horseshoe
Valley Resort. The upper and intermediate aquifers defined in our study for the moraine would provide
significant groundwater discharge ultimately in the northern reaches of the Copeland Forest.
ii T.........
Page No. 12
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Horseshoe Resort Comprehensive Development Plan
Horseshoe Resort
February 26,2003
File No. 3-02-0863
The proposed development plan of Horseshoe Valley Resort will consider the impacts to groundwater and
surface water flow into the Copeland Forest and incorporate engineered stormwater and other measures to
ensure that impact would be minimized and acceptable to Ministry of Natural Resources and the Ministry
of Environment.
6. WATER SUPPLY
6.1 Current Wells
The Horseshoe Valley development at this time, is currently serviced with water wells from confined
aquifers. Generally, the site can be divided into three water supply systems.
1. The Valley Water System (Zone 1)
This well system draws primarily from one well referred to as Well 3 (ill #22 on Figure 4). It is located in
the valley of the resort and currently supplies the following developments within the resort.
Hotel
Pineridge Subdivision
Simcoe Condominium
Existing Time Shares
Chalet
Maple Crest Subdivision
Birch Grove Country Club
Cathedral Pine Subdivision
The following are the general statistics with respect to Well 3.
Date Drilled:
Diameter:
Well Depth:
Length of Screen:
Rated Capacity:
December 1975
12 inches inside
302ft (92.1 m)
40ft
850 Imp. gal/min
This well was tested at the time of construction and evaluated by Ian Wilson and Associates, acting as
hydrogeologist, on behalf of the owner.
Wells 1 and 2 had been previously drilled in the valley area and were in operation prior to the drilling and
use of Well 3. It is our understanding that Weill is no longer in use and that Well 2 although not currently
used, has been permitted and is available for use.
_ Ton_
Page No. 13
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Horseshoe Resort Comprehensive Development Plan
Horseshoe Resort
February 26, 2003
File No. 3-02-0863
This well system is also connected to a standpipe located in the area. Specifics of this system are being
reviewed by URS Cole Sherman acting as engineers for this Comprehensive Development Plan assignment.
2. Municipal System (Zone 2)
Another well system had been constructed by Horseshoe Valley Resort. We understand it is now being
operated by the Municipality. This consists of a well that services the following development within the
Horseshoe Valley Settlement Node.
Carriage Hill Resort (Phases I, 2, and 3)
Highlands Subdivision (Phases 1 to 4)
Adult Life Style Community (Phase 1)
Estate Lots (Under Construction)
Proposed Carriage Hills Resort Phase 4
Well 1 has the following specific characteristics.
Date Drilled:
Depth of Well:
Well Diameter:
Length of Screen:
Rated Capacity:
3. Heights Well
July 1998
330ft (lOO.6m)
10 inches
45ft
500 Imp. gal/min
A high capacity well was also drilled primarily for the purpose of making snow for the resort. We
understand that recently an Application to Amend the Permit to Take Water has been submitted to be able
to use this well for irrigation of the current golf courses as well.
The following are the specific characteristics of the well.
Date Drilled:
Depth of Well:
Well Diameter:
Length of Screen:
Rated Capacity:
November 1990
278ft (84.8m)
10 inches
30ft
350 Imp. gal/min
This well was complimented by a test well that had been advanced in April of 1990 and by subsequent multi-
day pump tests supervised and analysed by Ian Wilson and Associates.
_T_
Page No. 14
I
I
I
Horseshoe Resort Comprehensive Development Plan
Horseshoe Resort
February 26, 2003
File No. 3-02-0863
It is our understanding that these three (3) water systems currently supply the water needs for the current
development within the Horseshoe Valley Node development area.
I
I
I
6.2 Existing Permits to Take Water
The three (3) water systems discussed above are operated under current Permits to Take Water. These
permits have evolved and in some cases have been amended throughout the years. The following is our
understanding of the current Permits in place. Copies are attached in Appendix B.
I
I
I
· Zone 1 or Valley System
A current Permit 89- P - 3 002 (with amalgamation of89- P- 3055) was issued May 8, 2000 for Horseshoe Valley
Resort Limited and expires May 15,2005. This permit includes the main production Well 3 discussed above,
provision for use of Well 2, and a surface pond located on the property.
The following are the permitted uses as per the Permit.
I
I
I
Source Name of Description Well #3 Well # 2 Pond
Maximum Amount taken per Minute (Litres/Minute) 3864 205 621
Maximum Amount Taken per Day (LitreslDay) 5,564,160 295,200 923,267
Maximum Number of Hours of Taking per Day 24 24 24
Average Number of Hours of Taking per Day 12 12 24
Maximum Number of Days of Taking per Year 365 365 123
Source
1
2
3
I
I
I
I
We understand that currently the pond is not directly being used but may eventually wish to be used for
irrigation or snow making purposes. It should be noted that this permit is issued for the purposes of "snow
making! golf course irrigation and public supply". It is our understanding that the resort intends to use this
permit only for public supply with all snow making and golf course irrigation requirements switched to a
subsequent permit currently being amended.
· Municipal Well System (Zone 2)
I
I
A Permit to Take Water 94-P-3019 was issued by the Ministry of Environment to Horseshoe Valley Resort
in March 1994. This permit expires March 31,2004. This permit covers the drawing of water from the one
I
i8T-
Page No. 15
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Horseshoe Resort Comprehensive Development Plan
Horseshoe Resort
February 26, 2003
File No. 3-02-0863
production well discussed above as well as permitted use from the original test well on the property. We
suspect this permit may have been amended subsequent to 1994 as this well system is now assumed by the
Municipality .
The following it a table summary of what the permit was issued for;
Source Name of Description Well # 1 Well # 2 (T.W. 1-87)
Ontario Ministry of Environment and 5,723,788 5,721,850
Energy Well Record Number
Maximum Amount Taken per Minute 2341 366
(Litres/Minute)
Maximum Amount Taken per Day 3,371,000 527,040
(LitreslDay)
Maximum Number of Hours of 24 24
Taking per Day
Maximum Number of Days of 365 365
Taking per Year
Source
1
2
· Heights Well System
I
I
I
The Heights Well System operates under Permit 92-P-3078, renewed in May 2000, expiring March 15,2007.
This permit was issued for irrigation purposes and will be used for irrigation of the golf courses and
continued snow making. An application from Horseshoe Valley Resort has been submitted to amend this
to encompass irrigation and snow making.
The following table summarizes the permitted use and water taking.
I
I
Source Name of Description Heights Well
Maximum Amount taken per Minute (Litres/Minute) 1590
Maximum Amount Taken per Day (LitreslDay) 2,289,600
Maximum Number of Hours of Taking per Day 24
Average Number of Hours of Taking per Day 12
Maximum Number of Days of Taking per Year 124
Source
1
I
I
I
iiT-
Page No. 16
I
I
Horseshoe Resort Comprehensive Development Plan
Horseshoe Resort
February 26, 2003
File No. 3-02-0863
6.3 Existing Water Requirements
I
Water records have been kept by Horseshoe Valley Resort. The current information available indicates the
following actual water taken;
I
I
I
I
I
I
Resort System (based on 2002) ........................................ 340,000m3/yr
Municipal Well System (Zone 2) (about 6700m3 /month) ..................... 80,400m3/yr
Snow Making Requirements .......................................... 1 42,000m3 /yr
Irrigation for both the Valley and Highlands Golf Courses combined .......... 240,000m3/yr
(* this included some taking for irrigation)
This translates into a combined water taking for the current Horseshoe Valley Settlement Node of722,000m3
/yr, plus the municipal system for an approximate annual taking of 802,400m3 /yr . It is important to note
that 382,000m3/yr is related to snow making and golf course irrigation. Also, the current total water taking
is Yz to 1/3 of the total permitted taking
6.4 Existing Water Quality
I
I
I
I
I
As of August 26,2000, the Government of Ontario introduced Regulation 459, The Ontario Drinking Water
Standards, which is part of the Ontario Water Resources Act. Horseshoe Valley Resort needed to comply
with these new regulations, which incorporated a water monitoring and testing program, with quarterly water
quality testing and reporting. Several of the more recent quarterly reports were provided to Terraprobe for
review. These test results are of the raw water which is drawn essentially from Well 3 in the resort area and
directed towards the 770m3 standpipe used for distribution. The results generally indicate acceptable raw
groundwater quality. The test shows no particular indication of groundwater degradation. A total nitrate
concentration in the groundwater is reported to be in the order of I.5mgl!.
I
I
I
I
These findings are consistent with groundwater monitoring carried out by Terraprobe in the mid 1990's at
the resort and are also consistent with comments made of Azimuth Environmental with regards to no current
groundwater degradation of concern.
I
;fm-
Page No. 17
I
I
Horseshoe Resort Comprehensive Development Plan
Horseshoe Resort
February 26, 2003
File No. 3-02-0863
6.5 Anticipated Additional Water Demands
I
I
I
I
I
The proposed Concept Plan has been outlined in Appendix C. The proposed CDP area, and development
proposals which are committed but as yet undeveloped outside of the CDP area are described in terms of
units as well as additional square footage for commercial space. It will also likely include additional
restaurant facilities which as a preliminary estimate may add some 1965 seats.
The nature of the developments also vary. They vary from timeshare type units to full scale single detached
homes to townhouse units. In order to provide an estimate of water demand as well as sewage disposal
requirements we estimated that each unit would represent approximately 1000 l/day of water use and
discharge or roughly 365m3 /yr, per unit. This is an average that will be used to assess overall impact from
water taking and effluent disposal. These numbers will be different from use by the municipal and process
engineer that will look at peaking factors and the like to assess system designs.
I
I
I
I
From a hydrogeologic perspective, it was our opinion that it was incumbent upon us to assess the entire
Horseshoe Valley Settlement Node area and not just the Comprehensive Development Plan which is a
smaller area defined within that Node. This is primarily because the proposed and existing development does
extend out beyond the CDP area into the whole Horseshoe Valley Node area. Based on this assessment, and
using the unit numbers provided in the proposed development plan, in the order of 1750 additional units are
proposed for construction. Roughly half of this is within the CDP area, with the remaining of approximately
1000 units around the peripheral including development areas such as Timber Ridge Subdivision, future
phases of Adult Life Style, the Northwest Lands and Carriage Hill Resort Phase 4. The proposed would
represent an additional approximately 640,000m3 water per year that may be required to service these
developments plus water requirements for proposed commercial, enhanced recreational and restaurant use.
I
I
I
I
I
It has been suggested that potentially an additional 1965 restaurant seats may need to be incorporated into
the overall development plan or wish to be so. Assuming approximately 200 litres per seat and assuming an
operational scheme of365 days/yr, this could increase the additional water requirements up to in the order
of 795,000m3/yr. This would equate to increasing the current total water usage in the entire Horseshoe
Valley Node area by approximately 2 to 3 times.
I
I
I
~ T.........
Page No. 18
I
I
Horseshoe Resort Comprehensive Development Plan
Horseshoe Resort
February 26, 2003
File No. 3-02-0863
I
I
I
I
I
As will be discussed in subsequent sections of this study, the effluenttreatmentand disposal system approach
is intended to incorporate a component whereby significant reductions in the amount of snow making water
and irrigation water can be considered. Approaches whereby effluent generated can be treated and recycled
for use as irrigation and snow making can significantly reduce the amount of additional water that will be
required to support the proposed development plan. These issues are complex. They will require further
study and consideration including phasing, integration of services, treatment levels, and the likelihood of
ongoing monitoring to assess the water usage and discharge components as the development phases progress.
It should be noted that the current Permit to Take Water for the Resort Well 3 has a permitted water taking
of I,OI5,459m3 annually. The PTTW combined for the three systems is 2,387,874m3 /yr. Only a small
portion of this is currently in use and the estimated additional needs would suggest that the proposed
additional water taking can be accommodated within the current Permits to Take Water.
I
I
In conjunction with URS Cole Sherman, it is anticipated that Terraprobe will proceed with the required
technical studies in support of the further amended Permits to Take Water to demonstrate impacts, long-term
yields and assess whether it may be beneficial to pump from more than the current wells in place.
I
I
I
I
I
6.6 Anticipated Impact to Aquifer from Additional Taking
I
I
It is assumed that water taking for the proposed build-out will be from the existing wells and/or from other
wells likely advanced in the current central area of the Horseshoe Valley area. This will provide in excess
of lkm in most cases to the outer limits of the Horseshoe Valley Settlement Node area, which significantly
reduces the potential impact to any other existing or potential water users beyond the development node.
More hydrogeologic assessment will need to be carried out as the development plan progresses, to attempt
to quantify the amount of drawdown or impact to the aquifer that will likely occur with additional water
taking. However as noted above, the net additional water taking may be substantially lower as factors are
considered such as a reduction in snow making water and/or golf course irrigation requirements. It is
anticipated that additional pump testing of the existing well systems may need to be carried out to reassess
their capacities and also to help in terms of staging the need for new infrastructure and/or new well
construction. This is part of the engineering studies that will need to be carried out.
I
I
I
The water taking will be from the upper to intermediate aquifer located at the base of the Moraine which has
been proven to be an excellent high capacity aquifer. Groundwater flow direction from this area is generally
_ Ton_
Page No. 19
I
I
Horseshoe Resort Comprehensive Development Plan
Horseshoe Resort
February 26, 2003
File No. 3-02-0863
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
northward, contained within the Coldwater Watershed with groundwater flow direction extending northward
beneath and discharging into the Copeland Forest prior to reaching the Coldwater River. The Coldwater
River is in excess of 4 kIn from the water taking source and thus, impacts to base flows are not considered
a concern. The studies that will be carried out as part of the support of Permits to Take Water and
Certificates of Approval for effluent disposal, will need to take into consideration the comprehensive picture
of stormwater management, re-infiltration, loss to evapotranspiration and the overall water budget when it
considers the potential impact to aquifers and/or surface bodies of water. These will be completed as the
project unfolds. The significant inventory of hydrogeologic work completed to date, demonstrates that
sufficient potable water can be obtained to support the entire development.
7. EFFLUENT TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL
7.1 Overview of Existing Treatment and Disposal System
I
I
Prior to the mid 1990's, the majority of development at Horseshoe dealt with effluent disposal via Class 4
and/or Class 6 in ground or raised septic bed systems. In the mid 1990's, it was elected that a treatment plant
and exfiltration cell disposal system would be designed and built at the northwest comer of the property
adjacent to the Copeland Forest. This plant has now been in operation since the late 1990's and is currently
owned and operated by A WS Engineering and Planning who are contracted with Horseshoe Valley Resort
to receive, treat and discharge the generated effluent.
I
I
I
This system is currently operated under a Certificate of Approval issued by the Ministry of Environment #
1893-5CDN9E which was reissued as an Amended Certificate of Approval to America Water Services
Canada Corp on September 4, 2002. The essence of this treatment system is that of a Sequencing Batch
Reactor (SBR) with ultimate discharge of treated effluent to exfiltration cells. The system is designed to
have an ultimate average capacity of treatment and discharge of approximately 810m3 /day (295,650m3/yr).
Specific effluent quality criteria needs to be met at the point of discharge into the exfiltration cells as per the
conditions in the Certificate of Approval.
I
I
In discussions with A WS Engineering and Planning, it is their anticipation that the current constructed and
designed system will handle the current flows as well as the anticipated flows from the hotel expansion,
Carriage Hill Resort Phase 4, and the next phase of the Adult Life Style Community. They have had
excellent operational results with the exfiltration cells which suggests an opportunity to pursue increasing
discharge volumes. Current flows are being assessed.
I
I
I
~ T__"
Page No. 20
I
I
Horseshoe Resort Comprehensive Development Plan
Horseshoe Resort
February 26, 2003
File No. 3-02-0863
I
I
I
I
I
This disposal system basically reintroduces the water which is drawn up for domestic uses back into the
groundwater system at a localized down gradient point. The lands immediately to the north of this plant area
(in the order of 100m to the north) are provincially owned and part of the Copeland Forest complex.
The majority of the sewage associated with the development within the Horseshoe Valley Settlement Node
area is brought into this system. This includes the first phase of Adult Life Style, Carriage Hill Resort Phases
1,2 and 3, the residential components within the Horseshoe Village, the Hotel and Chalet. However, the
residential units located in Highlands Subdivisions 1, 2, 3 and 4, the Heights Chalet, the Cross County
Building, Simcoe Condominium, Pine Ridge, Maplecrest, Birch Grove, Cathedral Pines and the Accounts
Building currently are on private Class IV septic bed systems.
7.2 Anticipated Additional Effluent to be Generated
I
I
The proposed development modeVconcept appended to this report indicates a number of additional units and
the generalized type of units which are being proposed. These as well as potential additional restaurants and
recreational theme uses will generate additional effluent which will need to be treated and disposed of. As
discussed above, in Section 6.5, it is difficult to estimate the amount of effluent to be generated based on the
nature of the use which will vary from hotel units to timeshare condos to single family dwellings to
commercial retail space and recreational theme type use. However, based on the units that are being
proposed in the model and considering that several of these will be accommodated by the existing treatment
plant system, then approximately 1750 new units, commercial and restaurant uses will need to be
accommodated by a new disposal scheme.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Assuming a sewage generation average of 1000 l/day or 365 m3/yr per unit, this equates to about 638,752m3
of additional effluent that will need to be discharged per year for 1750 units. There are also various ways
to estimate this. The use of fixture counts, number of people per unit and various volumes per person can
result in estimates that can vary by 10 to 15%. It is also our understanding that a number of restaurant type
venues will be considered and maybe up to 1965 units. Assuming 200 l/seat per day this translates into an
additional 143,445m3 of effluent giving a total effluent in the order of 782,195 m3 /yr.
I
I
I
The current treatment plant facility designed to accommodate 810m3 /day will treat and discharge an
anticipated 295,650m3 /yr. Thus, the additional capacity which will need to be accommodated represents
about 2.6 times the volume of sewage that is currently approved and will be discharged through the existing
treatment plant system. In discussions with A WS Engineering and Planning and the other design members,
~tr'-
Page No. 21
I
Horseshoe Resort Comprehensive Development Plan
Horseshoe Resort
February 26, 2003
File No. 3-02-0863
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
it is clear that different treatment and disposal options for effluent will need to be considered for the ultimate
built out of the proposed development.
The order of magnitude of the sewage to be discharged requires that consideration be given to phasing,
monitoring, servicing, storage and innovative technology in order to minimize impact to the environment,
conserve on water consumption, and be economically viable.
7.3 Discussion of Treatment and Disposal Options
The Horseshoe Valley Settlement Node area and specifically the Comprehensive Development Plan area is
in a rural setting where there are no major surface bodies of the water where high volume point source
discharge can be considered. A practical option from an engineering perspective could include treatment
and piping the discharge to a surface water discharge off site which could be in this case the Coldwater River.
However, disposal techniques, treatment and options are available to deal with the servicing on-site without
the need to expand outside the Horseshoe Valley Settlement Node area. This local option is the preferred
method of disposing of the effluent.
Currently, as discussed above, sewage disposal is handled via some private Class 4 septic bed systems but
the majority is handled through SBR treatment and exfiltration cells. The potential for expanding the
exfiltration cell system will be explored as a priority for initial phases of expansion. However, given the
significant volume of water which we anticipate will need to be dealt with, it is probable that a combination
of a number of disposal options will ultimately need to be considered. All will initially require a
sophisticated treatment of the effluent (i.e. anticipated new treatment plant) to minimize impact to the
groundwater regime and/or possibly surface water down gradient.
The nature of the development area lends itself well to a spray irrigation approach after treatment is carried
out. The significant acreage that is available from existing golf course fairways, tees and roughs, opened
wooded areas, ski-slopes and treed areas on the slopes provide an ideal opportunity for spray irrigation
disposal. Complimenting this could also be the disposal of effluent after treatment via snow making and
spraying. Snow making could take place from a practical disposal purpose on the ski-slopes but also can be
extended to the golf course areas and other open areas during the winter months.
I
I
I
~T_
Page No. 22
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Horseshoe Resort Comprehensive Development Plan
Horseshoe Resort
February 26, 2003
File No. 3-02-0863
Other successful technologies are immerging associated with Ski Resorts which include enhanced
evaporation spraying above open areas using snow guns to enhance evaporation rates and eliminate a
significant amount of effluent.
More conventional techniques associated with infiltrating treated effluent into the shallow soil on the
property is also a very viable option which will be explored. This could be particularly practical in the upper
area golf courses where sandy soils prevail. The combination of these and other technologies will result in
successfully dealing with the disposal of the effluent.
7.4 Treatment and Spray Irrigation
Spray irrigation is being used successfully in many commercial settings, resort communities and on golf
courses for handling effluent. When sufficient treatment is provided by SBR or other more sophisticated
treatment technologies, irrigation can be carried out during favourable months (May through September) at
a rate that equates approximately to the evapotranspiration rate for the area. The Azimuth Environmental
Report for the Oro-Moraine included a detailed water balance for the moraine and suggests an
evapotranspiration rate in the order of 509mm/yr. Provincially, in the order of 500mm/yr is considered
satisfactory and reliable.
Given the potential need to discharge approximately 780,OOOm3 of effluent annually and assuming that
approximately 500mm/yrcan be discharged and match evapotranspiration, then approximately 386 acres of
open land area for spray irrigation will need to be achieved. In discussions with Horseshoe Valley Resort
personnel the combination of the existing golf courses, fairways, tees and roughs, the ski-slopes and wooded
areas well exceed 400 acres that are available. In this regard, potentially all or most of the generated effluent
for the proposed development could be handled via a spray irrigation approach.
However, as discussed previously, we feel that the more appropriate approach and more likely will be a
combination of disposal via spray irrigation, and others by snow making, exfiItration and infiltration.
It is envisioned that the studies required and the direction taken with respect to these options will need to be
thought out as the development progresses and will be tied in with the timing and nature of the phasing of
the development. Capital works are anticipated to be carried out at various stages prior to approvals being
given and development proceeding.
~T~
Page No. 23
I
Horseshoe Resort Comprehensive Development Plan
Horseshoe Resort
February 26, 2003
File No. 3-02-0863
I
I
A tremendous benefit can be gained if a system is set up whereby effluent is disposed of on the golf courses
during the summer and snow blown on the slopes and fairways during the winter. As discussed in our
previous sections, approximately 142,000m3 of water per year is taken from the aquifer for making snow and
an addition 240,OOOm3 /yr is taken for irrigation of the two existing golf courses. The combination of this
382,OOOm3 can be partially if not totally eliminated ifthese demands can be met by treated effluent disposal.
This results in a net groundwater taking increase in the order of398,OOOm3 as opposed to 780,000m3.
I
I
I
The final details of treatment at this point have not been totally determined. However, treatment levels for
nitrogen to levels below 5mg/1 are reasonable to achieve as well as significant treatment of phosphorous
down to low levels (ie: 0.3 mg/l). Bacteria, ammonia and other pathogens are normally also taken care of
through the treatment process to ensure that no health haziard concerns exist. These suggested criteria are
even more stringent than currently accepted for the treatment plant design to handle 295,650m3/year.
I
I
I
I
The degree of treatment that will need to be carried out will be partially dependant upon the type of disposal
option considered. For disposal into the ground system more effort may have to be given with respect to
treating for nitrogen to ensure that the reasonable use guidelines can be met at the property boundaries. If
however, the pathway is basically to surface water which will ultimately be the receiver in the Copeland
Forest, then treatment of phosphorous may need to be carried out depending on what impact to the Copeland
Forest might be. The associated assessments and treatment levels will need to be discussed with the
Provincial Agencies as the development progresses to discuss to what degree treatment will have to be
provided.
I
I
I
I
In summary, at this stage in the planning process there appears to be sufficient land area where all or most
of the pre treated effluent can be dealt with via spray irrigation. However, a substantial portion could also
be considered for snow making. We believe a viable preferred option could be to investigate expansion of
the current exfiltration system with the possible need for more enhanced treatment of the effluent prior to
discharge. These and other combinations can be discussed and studied at a later date as the approval process
advances.
I
I
I
7.5 Impact to Groundwater
The groundwater regime and water budget have been discussed in previous sections of this report. In
general, there is an upper water tab Ie which is beneath the Horseshoe Valley Settlement Node area being near
I
I
$ T__'"
Page No. 24
I
Horseshoe Resort Comprehensive Development Plan
Horseshoe Resort
February 26, 2003
File No. 3-02-0863
I
elevation 330m in the uplands in the Adult Life Style Community area, falling to an approximate elevation
of 303 m near Horseshoe Valley Road and falling further to a near elevation 212m near the north property
boundary at the current treatment plant.
I
I
I
I
The drinking water aquifers utilized in the Oro-Moraine are defined as the upper and intermediate aquifers
which have been shown on Figures 5 and 6 cross sections to be of substantial depth and protected by
aquatard materials.
I
I
Groundwater flow direction in both the upper and intermediate aquifer as well as the shallow groundwater
table is all northward. The shallow groundwater table begins to discharge as surface water into the Copeland
Forest near the north property boundary of Horseshoe Valley. It was noted previously as well that there is
a stream with several ponds located on the Horseshoe Valley property incorporated into the current golf
course that intercepts the shallow water table and directs flow into the Copeland Forest. It is envisioned that
the upper water table discharges a short distance into the forest. Additional discharge from the upper and
intermediate aquifers probably occurs in the northern limits of the Copeland Forest as well as over as far as
the Coldwater River.
I
I
Without providing extensive hydrogeologic study of the Copeland Forest, exact mixing and discharge points
of these three water streams cannot be clearly understood. However, the evidence is clear that there is an
upward gradient from the upper and intermediate aquifers at the north end of Horseshoe and likely as well
beneath Copeland Forest. This eliminates the risk of surface introduced contaminants migrating down into
the drinking water aquifers.
I
I
I
Potential impact to groundwater can come from a number of sources. These are generally as follows;
I
.
Road salts and nutrients from lawn fertilization infiltrating to the shallow groundwater table.
I
.
Discharge of sewage effluent via tile beds, exfiltration cells and to a lesser degree spray
irrigation can ultimately be mixed with infiltrating precipitation and via a downward
gradient reach the shallow groundwater table.
I
I
.
The taking of water from the deeper confined aquifers can change the vertical gradients and
change the amount of water which is migrating down to lower aquifers.
I
I
~tr-
Page No. 25
I
Horseshoe Resort Comprehensive Development Plan
Horseshoe Resort
February 26, 2003
File No. 3-02-0863
I
.
Theoretically, in extreme cases the base flows to streams can be impacted if the gradients
have changed substantially enough to draw surface water into the lower aquifers.
I
I
In the case of this proposed development expansion, sewage effluent will be treated prior to discharge to the
environment. The receiver of any sewage effluent treated or not will be first the shallow water table which
then flows in a northerly direction and becomes surface water in the Copeland Forest. In this regard, the
impact to a true groundwater regime is minimal as the effluent transport medium will be into a surface water.
environment. Nutrients that are contained within sewage effluent are then further attenuated and absorbed
in plant structure and by further dilution in the surface water and wetland complex.
I
I
I
The groundwater aquifers( i.e. upper and intermediate aquifers) are at a substantial depth below the ground
surface environment, protected by aquatard materials and would exhibit an upward gradient at the north
property boundaries. This minimizes the potential for impact to the groundwater quality from disposal of
effluent.
I
I
The use of exfiltration cell technology for disposal is going to be activity explored particularly for the earlier
phases of new development. This technology is currently used at this site via a treatment plant and
exfiltration cells located near the north end of the property at the Copeland Forest. It is anticipated that if
additional exfiltration cell technology will be utilized they will also be constructed in the low valley areas
particularly and likely closer to the north property boundaries perhaps near the current exfiltration cell
systems. The benefit to this is that there are no groundwater users directly down gradient from this point that
could be impacted. As well, the receiving water table to which the effluent discharges become surface water
a short distance into the Copeland Forest. Thus, again there is no impairment to true groundwater quality.
The treatment processes can be enhanced to ensure that impacts to surface water particularly phosphorous
and ammonia can be adequately handled and again minimize impact to surface water as well.
I
I
I
I
I
I
Spray irrigation and snow making technology will discharge a certain percentage of nutrients to the ground
surface. These nutrients are normally absorbed into plant structure, held within grasses and exhibit uptake
by trees that contribute a substantial percentage to nutrient retention and absorption. These details will be
looked at as development proceeds and specific impact analyses are carried out. However, even if there is
still an amount of free nutrients that can be transported into the shallow groundwater system, the receptor
is the shallow groundwater table and ultimately the surface water in the Copeland Forest. This again,
minimizes the concerns with respect to possible impact to other groundwater users.
I
I
I
I
ii T__
Page No. 26
I
Horseshoe Resort Comprehensive Development Plan
Horseshoe Resort
February 26, 2003
File No. 3-02-0863
I
Further studies will consider in detail the method of disposal, treatment, location and long-term impact as
part of the approval process. This will include discussions with the Government Agencies (Ministry of
Environment and Ministry of Nature Resources).
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~T_
Page No. 27
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Horseshoe Resort Comprehensive Development Plan
Horseshoe Resort
February 26, 2003
File No. 3-02-0863
8.0 REFERENCES
American Water Services Canada Corp. 2002. Monthly Report, Horseshoe Valley WWTF.
Azimuth Environmental Consulting, Inc. 2001. Hydrogeological Study, of the Oro Moraine,
Township of Oro-Medonte.
Azimuth Environmental Consulting, Inc. 2002. Draft Report - Natural Heritage, Evaluation &
Recommendations for, Preservation of Environmentally, Significant Areas on the Oro Moraine,
Township of Oro-Medonte. Compact Disc.
Barnett, P.J. 1997. Quaternary Geology, eastern half of the Barrie and Elmvale areas; Ontario
Geological Survey, Map 2645, scale 1 :50,000.
Burwasser, G.J. and Boyd, S.T. 1974. Quaternary Geology of the Orr Lake Area (Western Half)-
Nottawasaga Area (Eastern Half), Southern Ontario; Ontario Div. Mines, Prelim. Map P.975, Geol.
Ser., scale 1 :50,000. Geology 1974.
Burwasser, G.J. and Ford, M.J. 1974. Bedrock Topography of the Orr Lake Area, Southern Ontario;
Ontario Div. Mines, Prelim. Map P.976, Bedrock Topography Ser., scale 1 :50,000. Geological
compilation, 1974.
Burwasser, G.J. and Ford, M.J. 1974. Drift Thickness of the Orr Lake Area, Southern Ontario;
Ontario Div. Mines, Prelim. Map P.977, Drift Thickness Ser., scale 1 :50,000. Geological
Compilation, 1974.
Canada Centre for Mapping; Department of Energy, Mines and Resources 1995. Topographic map,
Elmvale, Simcoe County, Ontario, Map 31 D/12, scale 1 :50,000.
Chapman, L.J. and Putnam, D.F. 1984. The Physiography of Southern Ontario; Ontario Geological
Survey, Special Volume 2, 270p. Accompanied by Map P.2715 (coloured), scale 1 :600,000.
Gartner Lee Limited 1992. Horseshoe Valley Resort, Sanitary Servicing Study, Preliminary
Hydrogeological and Biological Study.
~ T__
Page No. 28
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Horseshoe Resort Comprehensive Development Plan
Horseshoe Resort
February 26, 2003
File No. 3-02-0863
Geospec Engineering Ltd. 1992. Hydraulic Conductivity Assessment, Horseshoe Valley Tile Bed
System, Lot 2, Concession III, Township ofMedonte. R.V. Anderson & Associates Ltd.
Ian D. Wilson Associates Ltd. 1976. Aquifer Evaluation, Horseshoe Valley Ltd., Township ofOro.
Ian D. Wilson Associates Ltd. 1988. Well Evaluation, WeIll, Salvil Investments Ltd.
Ian D. Wilson Associates Ltd. 1990. Hydrogeologic Overview, Effluent Disposal, Horseshoe Valley
Development Corporation, Township of Oro and Medonte.
Ian D. Wilson Associates Ltd. 1990. Test Well Evaluation, Horseshoe Valley Development
Corporation, Horseshoe Valley North, Township of Medonte.
Ian D. Wilson Associates Ltd. 1991. Production Well Evaluation, Horseshoe Valley Development
Corporation, Horseshoe North, Township ofMedonte.
MNR, 1953, 1978. Aerial Photography, black and white.
MOE,2002. Ground water bulletin report, Water well data system (Well Records).
Planning Partnership, The 1997. Township ofOro-Medonte, Official Plan. The Corporation of the
Township ofOro-Medonte.
Terraprobe Limited 1992. Hydrogeologic Inventory, Township of Oro, Simcoe County. The
Corporation of the Township ofOro. (Project # 92511).
Terraprobe Limited 1994. Corridor Study, Hydrogeological Evaluation, Township ofOro-Medonte.
The Corporation of the Township ofOro-Medonte (Project # 94636).
Terraprobe Limited 1995. Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Exfiltration Ponds, Horseshoe
Valley Resort Disposal System, Township ofOro-Medonte, Ontario. The Horseshoe Valley Resort.
(Project # 95570).
~ T_'"
Page No. 29
I
I
Horseshoe Resort Comprehensive Development Plan
Horseshoe Resort
February 26, 2003
File No. 3-02-0863
I
I
I
I
I
Terraprobe Limited 1996. Proposal for Temporary Emergency Sewage Disposal, Horseshoe Valley
Resort, Township ofOro-Medonte, Ontario. Ministry of the Environment and Energy. (Project #
95570).
Terraprobe Limited 1996. Hydrogeologic Assessment, For Preparation of the Official Plan,
Township ofOro-Medonte, County of Simcoe. The Corporation of the Township ofOro-Medonte.
(Project # 95567).
Terraprobe Limited 1998. Additional Hydrogeologic Investigation Findings, Exfiltration Ponds,
Horseshoe Valley Resort, Township of Oro-Medonte, Ontario. Thorburn Penny Consulting
Engineers. (Project # 98644).
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Terraprobe Limited 1999. Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Carriage Hill Homes Phase II,
Carriage Hill Resort, Township of Oro-Medonte, Ontario. Carriage Hill Resort Corporation.
(Project # 99506).
Terraprobe Limited 2000. Hydrogeological Assessment, Proposed Horseshoe Adult Lifestyle
Community, Lots 2, 3 & 4, Concession 4, Township of Oro-Medonte. Horseshoe Valley Resort.
(Project # 00679).
Terraprobe Limited 2000. Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Carriage Hill Homes Phase III,
Carriage Hill Resort, Township ofOro-Medonte, Ontario. Carillion Construction Canada. (Project
# 00684).
Terraprobe Limited 2000. Proposed Golf Cart Underpasses; County Road 22 at Horseshoe Valley
Resort, Preliminary Geotechnical Recommendations. Horseshoe Valley Resort. (Project # 00740).
I
I
I
I
I
Terraprobe Limited 2001. Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Residential
Subdivision, Adult Lifestyle Community, Township ofOro-Medonte, Ontario. Laurel View Homes
Ltd. (Project # 01596).
~ T.........
Page No. 30
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Horseshoe Resort Comprehensive Development Plan
Horseshoe Resort
February 26, 2003
File No. 3-02-0863
Terraprobe Limited 2001. Hydrogeologic Review, Proposed Shell Group Incorporated, Carriage
Hills Phase 4, Timeshare Development, Horseshoe Valley Resort Area, 3rd Line, Township of Oro-
Medonte, Ontario. Shell Group Incorporated. (Project # 01631).
Terraprobe Limited 200 1. Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Sanitary Sewer Extension, Planned
Lifestyle Community, Horseshoe Valley, Ontario. Azurix North America. (Project # 01598).
Terraprobe Limited 2001. Horseshoe Valley - Proposed 13 Residential Lots, Slope Stability
Assessment, Township ofOro-Medonte, Ontario, Horseshoe Resort. (Project # 01602).
Terraprobe Limited 2002. Preliminary, Geotechnical Investigation, and Slope Stability Assessment,
Horseshoe Resort Hotel Expansion, Township ofOro-Medonte, Ontario, Horseshoe Resort Limited.
(Project # 3-02-0784).
Terraprobe Limited 2003. Hydrogeologic Review, Proposed Hotel Expansion, Horseshoe Valley
Resort Area, Township of Oro- Medonte, Ontario, Horseshoe Valley Resort. (Project # 3-02-0784).
Terraprobe Limited 2003. Geoenvironmental Investigation, Proposed Carriage Hill Resort, Phase
4, Township ofOro-Medonte, Ontario. Carillion Construction Canada. (Project # 3-02-0835).
Trow Consulting Engineers Ltd. 1993. Horseshoe Resort Corporation, Sanitary Sewage Project,
Nitrogen Cycle Testing. Horseshoe Resort Corporation.
Sincerely,
T4ZRClprob4Z Llmlt4Zd
Kirk R. Jo nson, P. Eng.
Associate
KRJ/lc
---.
Page No. 31
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FIGURES
-
Tczrraprobcz
Limitczd
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Jan. 2003
Ii "',..prob'
SITE
3-02-0863
LOCATION
PLAN
FIGURE 1
I
I
SIMCOE
CONDOMINIUM
MAPLECREST
SUBDNISION
"WIrIS
I
I
I
.."""
I
I
'" sums
EXIST1NG DAY
LODGE
EXISTING TIME
SHARE
I
4DUNtIS
I
RECREATION
CENTRE
HOTEL CONDO
3BLOTS.BW1S
CARRIAGE HILLS
RESORT - IV
7BUNtIS
I
EXIST1NG SEWER
EASEMENT
HIGHLANDS
SUBDNISION
PHASE I
I
CARRIAGE HILLS
RESORT - I, II, III
52UH11S.,52tnGTS.$8UNI15-J72UHl'7S
I
HIGHLANDS
SUBDIVISION
PHASE IV
I
I
I
I
I
I
Feb. 2003
CONCEPT
PLAN
3-02 -0863
I
_ TerraproM
FIGURE 2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
January 2003
REGIONAL
GEOLOGY
3-02-0863
TERRAPROBE
FIGURE 3A
I
I
I
1
1
1
I.
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
January 2003
I
TERRAPR08E
I
LEGEND
PHANEROZOIC
CENOZOIC
QUATERNARY
Fluvial or Deltaic Sediments: very fine- to coarse-grained
sand, minor gravel, silt and clay.
Glaciolacustrine Beach and Bar Sediments: gravel,
sandy gravel and gravelly sand.
~J Glaciolacustrine Coarse-Grained Sediments: very fine-
to medium-grained sand, silt, minor clay.
RECENT
Fluvial Sediments: very fine- to coarse-grained sand,
gravel, silt and clay
Wetland Sediments: peat, muck and marl
Lacustrine Beach and Bar Sediments: gravel, sandy
gravel and gravelly sand
Lacustrine Coarse-Grained Sediments: very fine- to
medium-grained sand, silt, minor clay
Lacustrine Fine-Grained Sediments: silt- and clay-
dominated rhythmites
PLEISTOCENE
Till: Stone-poor clayey silt to silt
SYMBOLS
Till: Moderately stony to stony, sandy silt to silt
G Geological boundary, approximate
V1 Geological boundary, gradational
I / I Drumlin
I~I Glacial fluting
~ Ice-contact slope
~ Base of terraced escarpment (fluvial, glaciofluvial)
DIJ Area of ribbed landforms
/ G <1/ Kettle hole; kame
~ Area of hummocky topography or area of extensive kettles
~
Till: Moderately stony to stony, silty sand to sand
Glaciofluvial Ice-Contact Stratified Sediments: fine- to
very coarse-grained sand, gravelly sand and gravel, minor
amounts of silt, clay and flowtill
Glaciolacustrine Coarse-Grained Sediments: very fine-
to medium-grained sand, silt, minor clay
Glaciolacustrine Fine-Grained Sediments:
5b Silt-dominated rhythmites
5a Clay and silt rhythmites
Till: massive, stone-poor, clayey silt to silt
Till: massive, stony, gritty, silty sand to sandy silt
PALEOZOIC
ORDOVICIAN
CREDITS
Bedrock: exposed or with a very thin, less than 1 m, cover
of Quaternary sediments
Geology by P.J. Barnett, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991.
Drafting by S.Tait
PRECAMBRIAN
Cartographic production by A. Evers, Publication and Information
Services.
Glaciolacustrine Fine-Grained Sediments:
12b Silt-dominated rhythmites
12a Clay and silt rhythmites
Glaciofluvial Ice-Contact Stratified Sediments: fine- to
very coarse-grained sand, gravelly sand and gravel, minor
amounts of silt, clay and flowtill.
Bedrock: exposed or with a very thin, less than 1 m, cover
of Quaternary sediments.
NOTE: In general, sediments less than 1 m thick are not indicated on
this map.
~very p~ssible effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the
Information presented on this map; however, the Ontario Ministry of
Northern Development and Mines does not assume any liability for errors
that occur. Users may wish to verify critical information.
Issued 1997.
REGIONAL QUATERNARY GEOLOGY
3-02-0863
FIGURE 3B
Large a-p of
VI ell location
}>lan figure 4-
in flle
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
350
300
c
.2
..... 2
~
CD
W
WEST
C"')
0)
"0
C\'I
o
0:::
~
c
::;,
o
U
~
Q)
Q)
s...
U
c
o
(I)
Q)
.c
.....
C\'I
~
.........
JIr:
Q)
f
u
I
200
Lower Aquifer
1
SECTION
A-A'
SITE
-
s...
CI.'I
>
0:
s...
Q)
-
co
3:
"0
(5
U
-
1:'
CI.'I
>
0:
s...
.!
co
~
:E
o
o
-
15
I
-
"i
~
C
:=
:i
24
I
JIr:
Q)
CI.'I
s...
u
I
/'
Upper Aquifer
-
Legend
(]] Sand
Ed Clay
Ill] Silt
.,
c
0'
, ,
~ Stones/Gravel
HPAN Hardpan
PRDR Previously Drilled
......... Static Water Level
L- Water Found
SCALE:
Horizontal 1 :30,000
Vertical 1:10,000
EAST
z
<(
n.
:r:
Q)
;:
.c
(I)
::;,
-e
co
0)
::;,
350
.
..
JIr:
CI.'I
f
u
c
o
(I)
'3
o
u
I
300
.0
. .
, .
250
--
"",."
. .
-
.'. Intermediate Aquifer
. .
--
--
200
Bedrock
HYDROGEOLOGIC CROSS SECTION
T.".'....LIm..cI
Job No. 3-02-0863
AS SHOWN
FIGURE 5
Scale
Date DEC
~
. .
.
'.
"
....
"
..'
.'
z
<(
11.
I
.quifer
J:;!pQ.er Aquifer-:=. =- :~~ = j,Jpper Aquifer
Legend
II]
:{: Sand
Ea Clay
[ill Silt
~ Stones/Gravel
HPAN Hardpan
0
0
PRDR Previously Drilled 'I\t
>-
(1;1
~
....1L Static Water Level .r:::
0>
J:
.e...- Water Found
10-
0>
>
i2
10-
0>
-
cu
~ ..~
0> "'C
0> 0
lo-
U U
I I
SECTION
B-B'
SITE
Q)
~
0>
o
.r:::
I/)
0>
~
o
J:
23
I
-
"'C
(1;1
NO
NO:::
"'C>-
cu~
0-
o:::~
>-0>
-0
C.r:::
::::Sl/)
00>
UI/)-
10- -
0.0>
J:::
-(I)
-
.c
C)
a;
::t:
59
I
.a:
D
a:
11.
.'.
i.,:
.......'
..(...;
1 ;
. -
Intermediate Aquifer ';:;
Intermediate Aquifer
:ontal 1 :30,000
:al 1 :10,000
.";
Intermediate Aquifer
NORTH
400
"'C
(1;1
o
0:::
.~
::::s
o
....J
-
(J)
....:;
2
66
I
350
300
:': "
Upper Aquifer .:: '-.......
250
HYDROGEOLOGIC CROSS SECTION
-
Terraprobe Limited
Job No. 3-02-0863
Scale AS SHOWN
Date DEC 2002
FIGURE 6
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIX A
MOE Well Records
-
Terraprobe
Limited
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - -
Page 1
trUER WELl. DATA 3YSTEII 23 OCT 86 P /IIiE 1015 GIWUIIO HATER DUI.LETIII REPORT
,
UTlI CSG KIND WATER STAT Pimp TEST TEST ONfIER/LOG/SCREEN
COIICESSIOtl ~IELl EASTlIIG HEV DIA Of fOllfl!) LVI. LVI. RATE TIllE i'IATER I1EPTIIS III FEET TO I'IIIICII WELL NO.
HC LOT 110 NortTIlIIIG fEET DATE DRILLER INS WATER fEET fEET fEET GP!-I IIR/IIII USE FOR!-IATIOIIS EXTElm
'J
Vespra Township
t\UIIICIPALITY CODE 57016 (COIHINUED. . . )
'.I 08 )
PR ~I 1 23 57- 603350 975 05/75 3203 5 FI! 186 165 175 7 1/00 DO S!-IITII
13'139 4923960 BHI'IH SAND CLAY sms 0157 GREY CLAY 0186
\j Bill/II SAtlD 0203 (S 0197 03 )
PR W 1 23 57- 603'150 975 03/81 3203 6 FR 198 170 185 10 3/15 no SIHTlI v
18003 492..000 DIlI'IN SAtlD SrtlS GRVl 00..2 am'ltl SANn 0140
DI/IIN fSIJD SILT CLAY 0160 GREY CLAY SILT
\,) LYRD 0198 BRWN SAND GRVL 0202 BRI'IN SAIID
0208 (S 020'1 Oit )
PR W 1 24 57- 603060 965 07170 1510 4 FR 215 180 190 10 2/00 ST DO ORSER II
7448 4924'120 olllm TPSI. 0002 CLAY tlSllO 3rt/S 0050 IIPAN
\j 0090 GRVl 0130 CSND 0215 FSIJD 0225 (S
0220 Oft )
PR W 1 24 57- 603400 980 08/74 3203 5 FR 1'19 1'1'1 154 4 3/'15 DO SIIITIIS R
11604 4924200 BRI'UI SAIID 0126 BIU'III CLAY 0134 BlUm SAtlD
l) 01'17 BmlN CLAY 01'19 Dm'llI SA liD 0164 (S
0161 03 )
PR W 1 25 57- 604633 875 01/66 1510 4 FR 100 60 80 5 2/00 ST DO FORBES \~
4964 4925881 PIWG 0060 tiSI/O CLAY 0090 !-ISlm 0100 (S
" 0095 05 )
U PR W 1 25 57- 6011660 860 03/65 '1816 6 fR 114 48 97 8 2'1/00 ST no SINIIOtlS J
4970 4925666 PROG 0037 !-IStlD SILT Don CLAY IISIID GRVL
0115 (S 011't 03 ) I,ISIID 0117
0 PR W 1 25 57- 604750 870 10/68 3203 4 FR 44 35 45 2 1/00 no JOIlf/STOtt PETE
5551 4925800 TPSL 0001 YLLW CLAY 0016 CLAY HSND OMIt
/-ISt/D 0056 Is 0053 03 )
PR W 1 25 57- 604600 860 11/68 1510 4 FR 95 50 60 6 1/00 ST DO fOlWES ~IAl TER
0 6058 4925900 IIm~t/ TPSl CLAY 0002 aRWN CLAY IISlm STtlS
0060 FSNO 0080 HSNO 0095 (:; 0091 Oft )
PR W 1 26 57- 60',316 905 10/66 4608 30 fR 12 12 2 ST DO GOIlGI/ ~/
718 4926105 BRNfI cLAY 0009 I'ISIID 0012 GREY CLAY 0022
U PR W 1 26 57- 604%0 905 08/52 5510 4 fit 72 51 60 5 1/00 DO }'/nlGIIT "
4965 ,,926210 TPSL 0002 CLAY STNS 0017 HSlm 0062 IISIID
CLAY 0067 HSIID 0083 (S 0072 11 )
PR W 1 26 57- 60'~'126 895 05/56 1510 'I FR 92 '16 51 'I 1/00 DO UIHTED CHUIICH UANSE
l) 4966 4926226 TPSL 0003 CLAY SlVS 0027 CLAY HSIID liP AN
006't FSIID 11SIID 0092
PR W 1 26 57- 604532 890 08/59 1510 2 fR 55 '11 4 2/00 CO DO OllIE G
- 4967 4926016 fS/lD 0015 BLUE CLAY 0055 CSIID 0080 (S
\) 0074 06 )
PR W 1 26 57- 6O't402 885 05/61 1510 't fR 76 48 60 5 2/00 no COUCHHAtI D
4968 4925935 GIIEY CLAY 0040 CLAY HSI/D 0070 CSND 0076
(S 0073 03 )
~, PR W 1 26 57- 603535 905 06/61 1510 't FR 70 '11 53 3 3/00 DO ~IIUGIIT H
U 4969 4925318 01/1'111 CLAY 0030 FSND 0067 CSllD 0075 (S
0070 05 )
-: PR W 1 26 57- 6O't39o 880 07/70 '1816 6 FR 80 50 72 10 4/00 ST DO YOUGH I~
,) 7436 4926220 TPSL 0001 TPSl HSlm 0026 CLAY STtlS 0037
IISlm CSt/D 0085 (S 0080 Oft)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - -
\,j .....
Page 2
WATER WELL DATA SYSTEM 23 OCT 86 PAGE 1016 GlwtJlm WATm BULLETIN REPDRT
unl CSG K IfID ~IATEI1 STAT PUNP TEST TEST DWIIEI1/LOG/SCREEN WELL NO.
CONCESSIDII WELL EASTING ELEV DIA OF FOUND LVI. LVI. HATE TillE I'IATER DEPTIIS HI FEET TD WIIICII
ETC lOT tlO NORTlIItlG fEET DATE DRILLER INS WATEn fEET fEET fEET GI'''' IIn/IIN lISE fOlUIATIOIIS EXTEIIO
U
tlUNICIPALITY CODE 57016 (CONTItlUED. . . )
'.
I...) PR W 1 26 57- 61344513 13135 D717ft 120ft 5 fH 132 37 72. 3 1/00 DO TQHLINSDN JQIIN
11138 4925950 nm'lll CLAY SOfT 131317 GI1EY SAtin CLAY 1313313
GIIEY CLAY SILT SOfT 0057 GI1EY SILT CLAY
\...J 0063 GI~EY fSNO SIl.T OM5 (S 131362 133 )
. PR W 1 26 57- 61335130 890 135176 3203 5 FR 127 127 138 ft 2/013 DD fORBES I~
14160 49253130 BI.CK TPS!. 0001 BRWtl SAND GRVL DRY 0127
BRI'lII SAIIO wal1G 01'19 (S 0146 03 ) Bm'jU
.... SAIID CLAY 0152
U PR W 1 26 57- 60fl500 885 05178 4616 44 10 2/00 DO GOllGII TERRY
15185 4925950 TPSL 0002 SAtlD CLAY 0010 SAND CLAY GRVL
13020 SAtlD CLAY 131355 HSlm 13067 fSIlD 131382
U (S 0077 05 )
PR W 1 26 57- 613351313 875 136/130 36132 6 FR 147 52 120 20 4/1313 ST no fOI1BES 1.1
17046 4925350 alUm IPSL 0001 BR~1t1 CLAY liARD 00413 GREY
CLAY SAlm 131360 Bm'lH SAtlO GRVL DRY 131396
0 GflEY CLAY STNS 131313 GI1EY SILT TIIIN 13145
GI1EY CLAY IIAI10 01ft7 BI1~11l SAtlD CUI ~IBRG
0156 (S 0152 06 )
PR W 1 27 57- 604176 9213 04/65 2514 6 fR 70 60 67 3 2/30 1313 WOOD K
U 3534 4926530 TI'SL 013131 BRI'IN CLAY HSND 1313113 BLDR HSUD
CLAY 0026 GREY ,",SHO CLAY 131359 I.ISHO CLAY
131371 (S 01370 03 ) NSIID 131373 DLDR CLAY
,",SlID 0076
U PR W 1 27 57- 6134239 915 11/54 1637 2 fR 65 41 65 8 3/1313 1313 !!OOnE v
'1971 '19264(,5 CLAY 13017 WIIIT I' SlID 01355 ClAY 131365 CSND
GRVI. 13072 (S 131368 0(1 )
PR W 1 2.7 57- 604179 910 138/57 2611 " fR 85 513 913 60 /30 ST DD JAMISON J
. 4972 4926434 STIIS CLAY NSIID 130413 FSIID ClAY 0085 GRVL
V IISt/O 0092 (S 0085 07 )
PR W 1 2.7 57- 60'1153 915 10/57 1510 2 I'll 61 56 62 3 2/00 013 cormIER L
4973 4926549 liSt/I) 0005 BRIm CLAY 1313513 CSND 13073 (S
l) 01369 O{I )
PR W 1 27 57- 604294 9113 12/57 1510 2. I'll 22 32 'II 5 3/013 ST 1313 nONNEY H
'1974 4926{,05 CLAY 13022 I' SliD 1313913 NSND 011313
PR W 1 27 57- 6D4301t 9113 Ofl/60 1510 4 fR 513 ItD flS 3 2/00 UD IIAlON!: B
\) 4975 4926(100 1311I'l1l CLAY 0010 omlN ClAY BLUR 01350 '"'SIlO
0060 (S 0054 06 )
PR W 1 27 57- 604274 915 12/61 1510 2 FR 8{1 65 S 2/130 DO \~OOOS K
- 4976 fl926395 fS11D CLAY 130613 /lPAN SIllS 1313130 CSIIO 131390
U (S 006ft 136 )
PR W 1 27 57- 61323913 91313 135/63 1510 4 fR 110 100 100 6 2/130 ST DO SLESSOR 0
4977 4925550 PIWG 0101 /lPAN 0106 GIWL 131113 (S 01136
0(/ )
() PR W 1 27 57- 603452 910 132/65 15113 fl Fn 71 60 71 3 2/00 DO SIlEAflDOI~1I J
4978 4925683 BfI~11I CLAY ODD{t IIPAN QD3fl FSNO 131371 CStlO
00>16 (S 0072 Olt )
-: PR W 1 27 57- 61341351 92.0 138/66 3203 5 fR 83 8fl 11313 6 2/013 DO \'IATSON R
() 4979 49267Q{t FfI 1136 TPSL 013131 YLLW CLAY 13015 GREY CLAY 131338
- COtlTIflUED -
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - -
PaiIt1 No. 3
WATER WELL IJPoTA SYSTEI-! 23 OCT 66 PAGE 1017 GROUNIJ WATER flU [-TIN REPORT
." i
Un! CSG KJlm I'IATER STAT PUIIP TEST TEST millER/LOG/SCREEN
COtlCESSIOtl WELL EASTItlG HEY (HA OF FOUND LVL LVL RATE TIllE ~IATER IJEPTIIS IN fEET TO WIIlCII WELL NO.
ETC lOT NO IIORT/IING fEET DATE DRILLER IllS ~IATER fEET ft:ET fEET GPH IIR/IIN USE fOm-IATIONS EXTEIIU
\j
lIutnCIpAlITY CODE 57016 I CONTINUED. . . )
'.) nLH CSIID 0059 GRVL 0106 tlsND CLAY 0113
(S 0107 Oft ) IS 0111 03 ) GREY CLAY
Olll,
to .) PR W 1 27 57- 60l,305 923 01/73 1204 5 fR 157 110 135 6 1/30 DO OADEs I~
9b6l, 4926'190 DUlIN fI LL GRVL 0004 BnWN CLAY SAND 0044
DnI-IN SAND GI1VL DLDR 0118 GnEY CLAY 0157
BlINN SAND GRVL 0160 (S 0157 03 )
-,; PR W 1 27 57- 604350 910 07/77 3135 5 fR 52 52 73 6 4/00 DO NECKS G
14989 4926350 Bmltl TPSL 0001 Dm~tI SAtID GRVL ClAY 0052
BIH-III SAIID 0077 (S 0071i 03 ) CLAY SAND
0077
l.) PR W 1 27 57- 604200 900 10/80 1467 5 fR 76 50 60 10 1/00 DO comHER l
17092 4926300 BLCK TPSl 0002 BRIm SAND CLAY 0042 BRNN
SAIIO 0060 GREY GltVL 0076 BRNN CStlD 0085
(S 0060 Oli ) ~IIIIT CLAY GltVL 0085
t.) pR W 1 28 51- 603909 935 07/56 5510 4 DRY JAtnESotl A
4980 4926959 IPSL 0002 CLAY HSND 0013 CLAY HSND SINS
0019 !lPAtI 0074 IIUCK 0076 CLAY SIllS 0092
BLUE CLAY 0150
...~I PR W 1 28 57- 60lt031 920 11/62 l,102 30 FR 20 10 2 DO HCLEAII K
4981 4926809 IIRIIN CLAY 0020 tlSNU 0024
pR W 1 28 57- 602285 880 09/66 3203 fR 110 96 98 8 2/00 ST DO 6ALUlHCK G
4982 4925570 PROG 0092 GRVL 0111
'.J PR W 1 28 57- 604050 925 08/73 1204 5 fR 156 98 110 8 2/30 DO ~IA TSOII S
10225 492681i0 PlmG 0008 BR~IN SAND 0060 GREY SAND SILT
GRVL 0105 GREY CLAY 0156 Dm~N SAtlD 0165
(S 0162 03 )
".) PR W 1 28 57- 60lt050 915 02/7lt 120ft 5 fR 131 78 90 10 1/00 IN DO CUFfVAlICOE L TO
10993 4926750 omlu SAIl\) 0012 om'lN SAtlD GRYL 0025 BRNN
SAlin GUVL CLAY 0032 GnEY SArlO CLAY 0070
GUEY CLAY 0126 GREY CLAY GRVL 0131 GREY
-.1 SAND GRVL 01liO IS 0136 04 )
PR W 1 29 57- 603693 925 1215l, 1637 2 fR 38 38 50 10 2100 ST DO Olin I
4983 4927078 PEAT 0012 YLLW fSND 0040 WItIT FStlD 0050
H3tm 0057 (5 0053 Ol, )
..) PR W 1 29 57- 6038'i 9 945 07/63 2514 fR 86 36 87 Ii 4/00 00 JORY l
4984 4921059 PROG 0038 HSNO 0065 HSNO CRVL CLAY 0088
(5 0067 03 ) 1131m GnVL 0069 CLAY 0090
- PR W 1 29 57- 603803 950 06/67 3203 5 FR 65 40 50 Ii 2/00 SI DO IILJSZAIt J
'J 4985 '1927179 TPSL 0001 YUH CLAY ,",SliD 0017 YlLH '-ISt/D
0060 CLAY STII5 006" GRVl 0065 CLAY 0066
PR W 1 29 57- 603550 950 07/72 2514 6 fR 83 32 80 7 1/l,2 DO UCLELLAtI R T
8919 4927190 fR 85 TPSL 0001 RED SAND 0007 GREY SAIID 0040
.) GREY CLAY OOl,1i GREY CLAY SAIID BLUR 0083
GUVL 0085
PR W 1 29 57- 601950 800 08/76 280l, 30 fR 12 12 19 10 1/15 DO SLEsson DALTON
- 13582 4926200 GREY SAIID 0020
-. PR W 1 30 57- 6017l,8 785 10/M 5510 4 FR 79 6 3 2/00 DO ELLlOTSOU J E
\) - CONTINUED -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-
...1
Page 4
WATER ~IELL DATA SYSTHI 23 OCT 86 PAGE 1018 GROUND HATER DUUETItI REPORT
"
UTI1 CSG K HID \'IATEn STAT PUUP TEST TEST O\'ltIER/LOG/SCREEN NO.
COIICESSION ~IElL EASTUJG El.EV IHA Of FO\Jlm LVI. LVI. RATE TIllE WATER HErTIIS III fEET TO I'IIIICII
ETC LOT flO /10 rmIItIG fEET DATE DRILLER HIS WATEII fEET fEET fEET GPH IIR/IIII USE fOlUlATIONS EXTEtllJ
. - ,
HUNICIPALITY CODE 57016 (CONTINUED. . . )
',j
4986 '1926478 CSIID 001l, DWE tlStllJ CLAY 0038 BRHtI CLAY
GRVL STNS 0059 CLAY SILT HSII[) 0068 !lSNIJ
SILT 0079 (S 0074 15 ) fSNIJ 0089
~..I PR W 1 30 57- 603525 975 12/65 3203 5 I'll '16 40 67 5 2/00 110 KNHSEtI A
4987 4927(142 TPSL 0001 fStlO 0030 STNS 0032 FStlD 0046
\-ISt/D 0076 (S 0074 03 ) sms 0077
PR W 1 30 57- 602980 955 08/73 3203 5 FR 1(15 105 115 8 1/15 DO DI'/IfItlEI,L D
lj 10331 4927290 DIIUN CLAY SAND 0030 BR~IN GRVL CLAY 0040
GHEY CI.AY 01(,5 om'lN SANI) 0155 (S 0152
03 )
PR W 1 30 57- 601900 800 05/79 4608 30 FR 4 10 DO DUCK 0
U 16162 4926300 SANI) 0014
PR W 1 31 57- 603300 985 08/68 4608 30 I'll 28 1(, DO IIAIHNG IHCIIAEL
5759 '1927950 Uf!\'lN CLAY SHIS 0039
PR W 1 31 57- 603320 925 09/71 4608 30 FfI 17 17 24 4 1/00 DO tlOH\'IOOD 0
l) 8304 ',927900 GREY IISND 0009 BR~IN CLAY STNS 0027
PR W 1 31 57- 603380 975 07/72 '1608 30 fR 30 30 'II 5 1/30 DO NO IUIOO IJ
8882 4927870 UIU'IN CLAY 0016 GREY CLAY STNS 0045
PR W 1 31 57- 603350 975 11/72 3203 5 fR 50 35 52 10 1/00 DO UHnlCOl1O R
U 9512 (1927900 Onl'IN SAND CLAY SINS 0018 BnI'lN SAND GRVL
CLAY 00(12 BRI'III SAUD 00&7 (S 0064 03 )
PR W 1 31 57- 6032'10 925 08/73 3203 5 FR 'IS 31 40 7 1/00 DO CaE B
10339 4927990 nH~!N CLAY SAND STNS 0015 GREY SAUD CLAY
., 0030 GREY CLAY SAND STttS 00'15 BR~IN SAND
,.J STttS 0069 (S 0066 03 )
PR W 1 31 57- 602700 940 07/74 3203 6 fR 58 ',5 60 8 1/00 DO SUTTON ROY
11179 4927300 alUm SAt/\) CLAY SINS 0058 BRNN SAND 0069
~ (S 0066 03 ) BRI-IN CLAY 0069
(j PR W 1 31 57- 603450 960 0(,/7(, 3203 5 fR '10 7 18 6 2/00 DO KAWAI'!
11208 4927750 OlltUI TPSL 0001 YLLW SAND 0004 BRI'IN SAtlD
PCKIJ 00'10 BImll SAIID GRVl ~IOHG 00'17 (S
...) 004(\ 03 I BRI'IN SAIID CLAY 0047
PR W 1 31 57- 603200 1000 03/80 3135 5 FR 68 36 42 10 1/30 DO KOIIUT K
17454 4928050 TPSL 0001 BRWII SAND GRVL DRY 0068 BRIm
SAt/I) 0075 (S 0072 03 )
t) PR W 1 32 57- 603136 995 10/67 1510 " FR 78 50 60 10 1/00 CO no VEITCII H
4566 4926B9 RED USIID 0004 NSND CLAY 0068 FSND 0070
CSIIO 0078 (S 0074 0(, )
- PR W 1 33 57- 602966 1035 09/62 1510 4 fH 85 6'1 74 5 3/00 ST no GHEAVES J
U 4988 (,926550 GnVL NSIID 0004 CLAY IIrAtI 0085 CSND 0090
(S 0086 04 )
PR W 1 33 57- 601850 900 11175 3660 5 ffl 137 108 125 5 2/00 PO fARRltlGTOII ~/l1
12656 4928000 OR~ltI 1'1 LL 0005 BR~1tI SAtlD CLAY 0045 BRtlN
., SAND GRVL CLAY 0060 ORl'/N SAtlD GRVL DRY
I) 0094 BIU'/N CLAY GRVl 0095 BRI'1tI SILT CLAY
- 0106 0111'111 SILT 0137 nlmll IIStlD HGVL 0146
(S OIltl 06 )
.J PR W 1 33 57- 602850 1030 07/77 1(,52 5 fR 69 56 60 12 1/00 no GREAVES nOLJGLAS
- COIlTIt/UED -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-_. -
\./
Page 5
~IATER WEll DATA SYSTEH 23 OCT 86 rAGE 1019 GfWlJl1D WATER OUlLETHI REPORT
\ -,' CSG KIIID ~IATER STAT I'IIHr TEST TEST O~ltIER/lOG/SCREEN
UTH
COt/CESS IOU WElL EASTItlG ElEV nIA Of fOUllO LVI. LVL RATE TIllE ~IATER DEPTHS IN fEET TO WIIICII WELL' NO.
ETC LOT NO HORTlUNG fEET DATE DRIllER INS WATER fEET fEET fEET GrH 11n/IIN USE forUlA TI OtiS EXTEIID
I "
IIUIIICIPAlITY CODE 57016 (CONTIIIUED... )
\ .J 14411 4928650 BRWN TI'SL SAtlD STNS 0002 YllW SAIID STlIS
BLI)!1 0009 YLUI GRVL BLDR LOOS 0024 GREY
IlrAN liARD 0051 GIIEY CLAY 0070 YlUl SAIID
ij STNS 0083 (S .0080 03 )
PR W 1 34 57- 602696 1005 12/63 1510 4 fR 72 45 55 5 2/00 DO lIotlFORTH II
4989 4928977 CLAY GIIVL HSIID 0020 B 1!1111 CLAY BlDR 0035
BLUE CLAY STlIS 0060 CSI/[} 0072 (S 0068
\) 0(, )
PR W 1 34 57- 602600 1000 03/69 3203 4 fR 62 5(1 62 2 1/00 DO KEln WII
6180 ft929050 TPSl 0001 CLAY IISIID 0018 "'SIlO STllS CLAY
00<i<i CLAY IISIID 0062 IISIID 0070 (S 0067
U 03 ) IISIIO CLAY 0073
PR W 1 34 57- 602600 1000 07177 3135 5 FR (,9 49 55 15 1/00 DO I'/OLKEII F
1455ft 4928000 nllWI TPSL 0001 BI!I'ItI GRVL SAND STIIS 0049
Dmm SAIID I'IORG 0070 (S 0066 O<i ) ~n\'lN
d CLAY 0071
PR W 1 35 57- 602265 955 06/7(1 (,616 6 FR 122 11 32 10 3/00 DO GORSKI T 021
11093 ft929215 SAND GnVl CLAY 0057 SAND 0063 CLAY SILT I
0122 (S 0119 O<i ) HSIID FSIID 0127 I
\..j PR W 1 36 57- 602100 950 05/72 3203 6 fR 77 25 41 2(1 8/00 DO IIOnllEY J f !
8958 4929775 Blunl TPSL 0001 BR~IN SAIID DRY lOOS 0038
fllmll SAIID GRVl liARD 0077 BruIN SAND WORG
0083 (S 0077 06 ) on~1I1 SAIID CLAY 00l!3
" PR W 1 38 57- 601700 930 11/72 4608 30 FR l! 8 12 4 1/00 DO 1I0DGSOtl R
.....I 9619 4930480 GREY SAIID 0016
PR W 1 38 57- 601<\50 890 10/73 1510 4 FR 63 <\8 76 5 2/00 DO IIODGSOII RAlPII
10358 4930250 Fn 81 urUltI TPSL 0002 BRWtI SAtlD STNS 0020 GREY
\..1 GIIVL 0037 GnEY CSIIU 00<i6 GREY IIPAN sms
0056 GnEY GnVL CLAY CIITD 0077 YLUl "'SliD I
I
CStm 0091 (S 0087 03 ) I
I
PR W 1 38 57- 601700 925 05/78 lti52 5 FR 15 lti 90 4 1/00 DO IIODGSOII T 031
\J 15322 4930ftOO fR 96 LIR~III TPSL SAIID 0002 YlLl~ SAtlD STUS lOOS
0010 GREY GRVL CLAY OLDR 0027 GREY SAND
CLAY lYRD 0051 GIIEY III' AtI sms IIAlm 0078
GREY SAIID CLAY ~nrls 010(, (S 0101 03 )
\) GnEY CLAY STIIS SAIID 0104
PR W 1 120 57- 606850 820 12178 3203 6 FR 73 ftO 65 12 1/35 DO A TK IIISOtl G
16107 4920550 BnI'lIl SAIID STllS 0003 BR~III SAIID CLAY OOH
DIU'IN SAIID 0032 BnI111 CLAY SAIID 0058 GREY
., CLAY 0073 ORWI SAIlD 0069 (S 0085 0(, )
'..) PR W 2 5 57- 605653 790 Oft/59 2801 5 PUC BAnRIE
4990 4918822 TI'Sl 0001 CLAY HSIID 0005 NSIID SILT BlDR
0015 '"'SlID DUll! 00(,l! '"'SlID SILT BlDR 0106
\) DLDn 0147 BLUE CLAY GnVL BlDR 0161 BLUE
CLAY GRVl BlDII 0182 OLDR 0285 OlUE CLAY
0294 CLAY GRVL BlDn 0323 UlStl 032(,
-: PR W 2 H 57- 605(,07 765 06/6(, (,608 30 FR 2 2 2 110 lunCIIET v
... ft992 4920573 DlCK I-lUCK DOOft ,",SilO 0019
,.)
PR W 2 14 57- 605ftOO 760 06/79 3135 5 FR 57 FlI~ 52 (, 12/00 DO STHIAlH n
- COtlTINUED -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
..."",/
Paqe 6
GHOlllm ~II\TER IJlJLIETIN HErOIH
WATER WELL nATA SYSTEU
23 OCT 86
PAGE 1020
...1
Unt CSG KII/IJ I'IATER STAT 1'111,11' TEST TEST
HELL EASTING HEV IHA Of FOlJl1U LVL lVL flATE TIllE WATER
lOT tlO tlOIHIIIIIG fEET DATE DRILLER IUS I~ATEH fEET fEET fEET 61'11 IIIl/IIN IISE
OI'INER/LOG/SCHEEN
DEPT/lS III fEET TO ~IIIICII
fOIU>lATIOIIS EXTEND
CotlCESSION
ETC
......J
tlUlHCIPALITY CODE 57016 (COIUINUEI)... )
Ij 1665~ ~920600 fILL ooo~ GREY CLAY SAtlD GRVL
0057 GREY
0060 (S 0057 03 )
PR W 2 16 57- 60(,825 935 11/58 5510 II DRY SUTTON P
., 4993 ~921'172 nm~N CLAY sms I'IUCK 0088 IISIID 00911 )lPAtI
I,j
0096 Bn~IN CLAY US lID 01'10
PR W 2 17 57- 604666 930 05/56 2529 6 fR 30 4 14 5 2/00 DO SUTTON L
4994 4921810 CLAY 0004 CLAY HstID 0030 GIWL 0032
I.) PR W 2 17 57- 60(,550 940 06/72 1510 I)RY SIITTON L
9016 ll921970 um'll! CLAY 0012 IIPAN 00(12 BLUE CLAY !lPAtI
0331
PR W 2 19 57- 60(,100 920 11/74 2801 5 fR 145 117 118 10 1/30 DO J VANI)ER RAADT
, 11575 4922350 BRlUI CLAY SIIDY lOOS 0010 GREY CLAY STNS
\.J PCKO 0031 GnEY CLAY GRVL pClm 0051 GREY
CLAY STNS PCKD 0074 GREY CLAY SOFT 0108
GREY CLAY GRVl BLDR 0113 GHEY CLAY liARD
0 0139 GHEY CLAY GRVL 0142 GnEY CLAY 01'14
GREY CLAY GRVL BLOR 01(15 G/lVL SAIII) CLAY
0150 IS 0146 0(1 ) GRVL SAND CLAY 0206
PI! W 2 20 57- 603900 950 07/78 1452 5 60 142 156 7 1/00 ST DO COUTTS R
.0, 15526 4922900 fR 156 PRDG 0005 YllW CLAY 0060 Brmu CLAY GVLY
U
0120 omIt! SAIIO STNS 0155 YLlH fSIIO ClN
0181 (S 0177 04 )
PR W 2 21 57- 603707 960 11/64 5510 4 fR 162 1(,7 146 3 1/00 no nUIISNORE L
U 4587 4923054 TPSL 0001 CLAY 0024 CLAY HSIID 5111S 0027
CLAY ",slm 0071 "'Sill) 01(,3 CLAY HSIID IIPAN
0162 'fSIID 0176 (S 0166 0(1 )
PR W 2 21 57- 603620 965 08/70 1510 (, Fn 170 140 150 5 1/00 ST no ORSER f
0 7450 4923150 am'llI CLAY 5Tt1S 0019 BLUE CLAY STIIS 0069
GIIEY CSIID 0155 CSIID 0170 (S 0166 0(1 )
PR W 2 21 57- 602895 945 06/73 3203 5 fR 158 130 145 10 1/15 DO fom) R
9944 4922735 anl'ltl CLAY SANn 0030 13m'lN SAtI[) CLAY 0059
0 GIIEY CLAY SAtlD 0086 aRlm SAIIO 0125 GREY
fSlm 0132 GI!EY CLAY SAIIO 0156 OIll'III SAtin
0180 (S 0177 03 )
PR W 2 22 57- 602802 955 08/fA 1510 4 fR 123 123 132 10 2/00 ST ))0 OHSER II
(j 4588 4923303 anl'llI CLAY 0003 GRVL HSIIO 0135 CSIIO 0140
IS 0135 05 )
PR W 2 22 57- 603350 970 07/72 4608 30 fR 1"1 1"1 2(1 3 1/00 DO PEHKItlS C
8879 4923600 GREY SAND 0017 aRWN CLAY 0032
d PH W 2 22 57- 603600 960 06/77 1452 5 fR 165 146 150 7 1/00 PO RUGlfAN EVERETT
14409 4923400 amlll CLAY SHIS 0008 ORvIN SAIIO SItIS 0022
YlUI SAtlD DRY 0118 GREY CLAY 0126 GREY
SAIID CLAY 0137 GREY CLAY 0142 GREY SAND
d CLAY 0160 GREY SAIIO 0167 GREY SAIID FGRD
0175 (S 0171 0(1 )
PR W 2 B 57- 602600 950 05/79 1'i52 5 FR 175 15(1 162 10 1/30 ))0 SIRUIIIIIAtIN 0
16165 4923200 13LCI< TPSL 0002 GREY SAIIO CLAY 0048 alll'IN
0 CSIIO 0106 GREY FSIIIJ 0167 GREY CLAY 0172
GREY SILT 0190 GREY CSIID 0205 (S 0201
- CDtITIIIUED -
-
-
WELL NO.
- - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - -
i../
Page 7
Hf\TER WELL DATA SYSTEII 23 OCT 86 PAGE 1021 GROUNn WATER BULLETIN REPORT
, ,
Un! CSG KIND ~IATER STAT PUll!' TEST TEST O\'INER/LOG/SCREEtl WELL NO.
CONCESSION ~IELl fASTING HEV In A OF FOUlm LVL lVL RATE TIllE tlATER !JEPTIIS IN fEET TO 1'11I1CII
ETC LOT NO t101Hl1If1G fEET DATE DIIILLER HIS WATER fEET fEET fEET GPH IIR/IIII USE fORHA TIotlS EXTEIID
MUNICIPALITY CODE 57016 I CONTINUED. . . }
\.,..1 04 }
PR W 2 24 57- 602367 955 09/67 1510 4 fR 200 160 170 20 1/30 ST DO DOIIAtI C
4589 4923579 TPSL CLAY TPSI. 0003 DIUm CLAY 0050 CSND
"..... 0170 CLAY nSllo IIPAN 0190 CSIID 0200 (S
I,,) 0193 06 }
PR W 2 24 57- 602330 950 09/69 1510 4 fR 160 III 5 170 10 1/00 DO !JORAN CARL
6813 4923560 TPSl CLAY 0002 BrUit' CLAY 00{t7 BLUE CLAY
\j 0100 CSIID 0180 IS 0176 04 )
PR W 2 25 57- 602700 970 02/N 2402 6 fR 258 156 225 30 20/00 III 111m
11410 4924550 SAIIO 0010 CLAY 0020 !II' AN 00{t6 SAND 0053
GIIVL 0067 SAIID GIIVL 0075 !lPAN 0208 CLAY
\..J 0220 SAND 0250 GRVL 0266 IS 0258 08 }
PR W 2 27 57- 601606 935 07159 1510 2 fR 40 125 130 6 3/00 5T DO sunDtI C
4590 492'1730 fILL CStlD GRVI. 0120 DLUE CLAY 0157 GRVI.
0165 (S 0159 06 )
1.J PR W 2 27 57- 601600 925 09/71 1510 4 fR 255 138 138 10 1/00 5T 00 IlICKEY J
8225 492{t720 [JIm/! cLAY TPSL 0002 BlUm CLAY STNS 0036
IIPAN SAUD OHO cSlm 0160 GREY 1II1AN 0255
IS 0250 04 ) CSIID 0267
'-.J PR W 2 28 57- 601400 920 10/75 1452 5 fit 140 120 136 5 2/00 00 fORDES PAUL
12594 4925100 DLCK TPSL Slmy 0003 BRI'n~ GRVL SrtlS SNDY
0022 YLLW f5~O GRVL LYRO 0087 GREY CLAY
0095 YlLW FS~D DRY 0123 GREY CLAY 0140
" YLLH SAUD GRVL STNS 0160 (S 0156 03 )
..J PR W 2 29 57- 600987 835 10/66 3203 5 fR 59 59 65 10 2/00 00 ElROI"IN J
4591 4925661 P!tDG 0004 BRI'/tI CLAY 11SIID 0022 CLAY tlSND
BLUR 0039 N5NI) 0059 GHEY Ilsrm 0088 (S
'.i 0005 03 )
PR W 2 29 57- 601150 860 09/79 3602 6 fR 100 65 90 1 2/00 00 nATES I)
16240 4925{150 Dlmu CLAY STNS 0021 DRI'IN SAND GRVI. CLAY
0070 GREY CLAY S~()S 0100 BIII'IN SAND ~IDRG
J 0107 (S 0103 Oft )
PR W 2 32 57- 601300 780 08/76 2804 30 fH 10 10 25 12 1/00 00 AYRES 0
13561 (t927QSQ G!tEY SAtll) 0010 GREY SAIID I~BRG 0030
PR W 2 39 57- 598929 765 07164 251ft 6 Fn 93 28 83 1ft 2/00 ST DO PAfiU 0
.) 4592 4929060 1.ISIID 0009 BlUE CLAY 0057 CLAY HSND 0093
1,ISlm 0096 IS 0093 03 }
PR W 2 39 57- 599800 760 04/69 {1816 6 fR 66 5 26 10 3/00 00 SIIANNOU f
6257 4929350 NSNU 0029 GREY CLAY 0037 NSND SILT 0054
"' FSIID 0.Q66 CSIID 0072 (S 0068 04 ) CLAY
:.J 0073
PR W 2 39 57- 599760 879 0'1/73 120ft 5 fR 52 3 34 12 1/00 00 flAKEII 11
9789 4929{t57 BnWN SAND 0018 GREY CLAY 0039 BRI'lN SILT
'.J 0052 DIU'IN SAIID 0059 (5 0056 03 )
PR W 2 39 51- 598896 755 0717{t 3660 5 fit 151 40 10 2/00 DO KAInYS P A
11271 (ln9000 11 mill SAIID 0020 GREY SAIIO 0042 GREY CLAY
0098 GREY CLAY SAND 0100 GREY CLAY 0151
"J GREY FSND CLAY 0160 IS 0156 03 )
PR W 2 39 57- 599000 775 07/60 {,816 6 fR 7 7 22 5 2/00 DO ItIIIt V
- COt/TItlUEO -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - -
Page 8
WATER WELL DATA SYSTEM 23 OCT 66 PAGE 656 GROUND WATER BULLETIN REPORT
UTM CSG KINO WATER STAT PUHP TEST TEST OWNER/LOG/SCREEN WELL NO.
CONCESSION WELL EASTING HEV DIA OF FOUND LVL LVL nATE lIME WATER DEPTIIS IN FEET TO WltICII
~TC LOT NO NORTltmG FEET DATE DRILLER INS WATER FEET FEET FEET GI'I1 Im/MN USE FOIU1A TI ONS EXTEND
Oro Township
MUNICIPALITY CODE 57010 (CONTINUED. . . I
PR E 1 21 57- 60561i0 650 02170 3203 5 FR iiI 35 flO 2 1/00 00 PERRYMAN D
7079 1i921i550 PIInG 0026 GREY CLAY 001i1 GREY 11SND 001i5
(S 001i2 03 ) GIIEY CLAY 001i6
PR E 1 21 57- 606500 625 06172 4616 6 FR 60 12 55 7 2/00 DO SINCLAIR J
9271i 4921i770 Fn 67 SAND 0052 CSND 0067 (S 0061i 03 )
PR E 22 57- 605550 625 06170 3203 4 FR Ii Ii 6 20 11 1/00 DO BAnOER B
7258 4921i670 BIIWtI CLAY STNS 0016 GREY ClAY STNS 0035
GREY ClAY SILT 001i1i GnEY MSND GRVL 0050
PR E 1 21i 57- 606620 975 08176 1i616 8 FR 96 6 31 f, 1/00 DO LENNOX ROY
13501i 1i926700 SAtlD GnVL STNS 0012 SAND GRVL CLAY 0080
SAND CIHD 0096 (S OOM 09 )
PR E 1 21i 57- 606700 1000 11179 3660 5 fR 94 39 95 3 21i/00 DO IIAUGIITON f
16521 4926600 BnWN SAND 0001i BRWN GRVL 001i6 BRWN CLAY
GRVL 0055 BRWN SAND 0058 ORWN CLAY GRVL
0091i GREY GRVL CMTO 0108 (S 0096 09 )
BLUE CLAY 0115
Pit E 1 25 57- 601i821i 680 11/61i 1i713 I> FR ...3 50 65 8 2/00 ST DO MCLEAtI A
3069 1i925812 TI'SL 0002 CLAY STNS 0065 MSND CLAY 0069
(S 0085 06 ) I1SND 0093
PR E 1 25 57- 606205 1006 09/67 1i616 ll~ FR 80 7 60 6 21i/00 PS W R BEST SCIIOOL
3070 4926869 CLAY STNS 0023 GRVL 0049 GREY CLAY 0079
FSND CLAY 0090 (S 0081 Ofl ) (S 0085
Ofl )
PR E 1 25 57- 601i688 665 06/64 4616 6 FR 80 50 7', 6 2/00 DO JORY G
3510 4925962 PRDG 0050 FSND 0080 MSND 0086 (S 0082
Oli )
PR E 1 26 57- 601i515 910 03/60 1510 2 FR 60 60 70 4 2/00 00 MOSSEY B
3511 4926266 BnWN CLAY STNS 00',0 FSND 0074 CSND 0084
(S 0060 Oli )
PR E 1 26 57- 604521 910 03/60 1510 2 FR 71 55 60 5 2/00 ST DO IIAtlDY R
3512 4926251 DnWtl ClAY MSND 001i0 MSND 0071 (S 0065
06 )
PR E 1 26 57- 601i470 915 02170 1510 4 FR 90 60 80 3 2/00 DO CAtHER J
6217 4926360 PIIDG 0056 GREY liP AN 0060 FSND 0090 IS
0066 Oli )
PR E 1 27 57- 601i160 935 11/72 3203 4 FR 1i0 50 75 2 1/00 00 BROWN C
9526 4926750 BLCK TPSL 0001 BRWtI SAND CLAY GRVL 00li0
BR~IN SAND 0087 (S 0081i 03 )
- PR E 1 26 57- 604131 925 05/65 4616 6 FR 200 129 135 10 36/00 DO IIART 0
3075 4926635 onWN TPSL CLAY 0026 GRVL CLAY MSND 0094
BLUE CLAY olin MSND CLAY 01M 11SND GRVL
ClAY 0196 MSND GRVL 0201i (S 0200 Oli )
PR E 1 26 57- 603933 955 10/67 3203 5 FR 1i0 39 1i5 6 2/00 ST DO GllEAVES M
3077 4927159 TPSL 0001 YlLW SAND CLAY 0040 11SND 0060
(S 005', 03 ) (S 0057 03 ) ClAY 0061
PR E 1 26 57- 601i232 930 12/61 1510 " Fn 70 liS 50 15 2/00 00 11AXWELL N
- 3513 4926695 BfHlN ClAY STNS 0036 ClAY MSND 0050 !lPAN
.
0065 GRVL 0070
PR E 1 28 57- 604150 930 05175 1204 5 FR 87 25 80 2 1/00 DO NORlMN B-NOOLE
- CONTINUED -
- - - - - - - - - - .-
.. ---- _. - - - -
Page 9
WATER WELL DATA SYSTEH 23 OCT 86 PAGE 659 GROUND WATER BULLETIN REPORT
UTH CSG KINO WATER STAT PUMP TEST TEST OWNER/LOG/SCREEN WELL. NO.
CONCESSION WEll EASTING HEV DIA of fOUND LVL LVl RATE TII'IE WATER DEPTlIS IN fEET. TO WIIlCII
ETt lOT NO NORIIIING fEET DATE DRILLER INS WATER fEET fEET fEET GPM fIR/HN IJSE fORHATIONS EXTEND
MUNICIPALITY CODE 57010 (CONTINUED" .\
12182 492(,800 ORWN CLAY SAND STNS 0038 GREY SAND GRVL
CLAY 00U7 OHWN SAND GnVL 0090 (S 0087
03 )
PR E 1 29 57- 603883 %0 07/61 1510 4 FR 84 40 52 5 2/00 ST DO SALISBURY G
3514 4927239 BRWN CLAY 0025 MSND CLAY 0070 MStlD 0084
(S 0080 04 \
PR E 1 29 57- 603908 %0 07/63 2514 6 FR 49 34 50 8 1/00 DO IIANDY L
3515 4927154 TPSL 0001 BRWN CLAY 0019 YLLW HSND 0034
NSND 0052 (S 0049 03 )
PR E 1 31 57- 603417 1000 07/50 5510 4 FR 60 43 it3 5 2/00 DO HEPT OF LAND F
3516 4928067 NSlm 0005 NSND CLAY 0030 MStlD 0076 (S
0062 14 )
PR E 1 31 57- 605200 1150 09/69 3203 5 FR 188 160 170 5 1/00 DO ENNS E
6616 4929020 TPSL 0001 CLAY HSND STNS 0032 ~(S~D 0141
ClAY OIll9 tlSND 0187 CLAY 01M NSND 0199
IS 01n 03 ) (S 0196 03 \
PR E 1 32 57- 603177 1000 09/60 2611 4 FR 70 (10 70 4 3/00 DO PRIDIIAH G
3517 tln837ff PIIDG 0005 FSND CLAY 0060 FSND 0077 (S
I 0070 07 )
PR E 1 32 57- 603050 1050 06/80 3135 5 fR 74 (16 60 10 2/00 DO PEDLINGIIAI'( 04
17433 4928550 BIU'/N TPSl 0001 BR~IN SAND GRVl PCKD 0074
BnWII SAtlD 0081 (S 0078 03 )
PR E 1 33 57- 602980 1000 06/70 2514 6 FR 80 57 80 2 3/00 DO COWAN E R
726~ 4928780 TPSL 0002 GREY CLAY MSND GRVl 0051 YLlW
FSND CLAY 0060 YLlW MSIID 0084 IS 0080
Oft )
PR E 1 34 57- 602761 1020 02/61 1510 4 FR 70 51 57 10 2/00 ST DO OADES II
3518 4929067 Blllm CLAY 0006 IIPAM 0070 CStlD 0076 (S
0073 03 )
PR E 1 34 57- 602800 1020 08178 3660 5 FR 220 196 198 7 2/ 00 DO BIDWElL E OS'
15476 4928900 BRWN SAND GnVL LYRO 0205 WHIT SAND LOOS
0220 BRWN HSND 0224 BIMN CStlD 0226 (S
0225 03 )
PR E 1 35 57- 602470 975 07/68 3203 5 FR 61 25 45 1 1/30 DO NORRISON G E
5894 4929460 TPSL 0001 MSND CLAY 0016 tlSND 0046 ~ISND
CLAY 00(,1 HSND 0065 IS 0062 03 )
PR E 1 37 57- 602512 1035 12/73 4816 6 FR 332 176 228 8 ~/OO DO WALLACE 0
10901 4930263 UNKN SAND 0049 UNKN CLAY GRVl 0165 UNKN
FSNII 0182 UNKtI HSND 0209 UNKN CLAY SAND
GRVL 0~32 UNKN SAND 0345 (S 0337 04 )
PR E 1 37 57- 602423 1000 11174 3660 5 Fn 303 160 200 7 2/00 DO ABASCD MANT LTD 06
11764 4930203 RED SAND 0008 BRWN SAND CLAY 0030 YLlW
SANII 0039 GREY SAND ClAY 0065 GREY CLAY
cnVL 0130 GREY SAND CLAY OVI6 BIIWN S Aim
CLAY 0160 BLUE CLAY 0276 BLUE CLAY 0303
ORWN SAND 0310 (S 0307 03 )
PR E 1 37 57- 602451 1000 12/7(t 3660 5 FR 128 35 70 10 2/00 DO ABASCO HAMT LTD
- COt/TIt/UED -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
..
Page 10
WATER WELL DATA SYSTEM 23 OCT 86 PAGE 660 GROUND WATER BULLETIN REPORT
UTH CSG KIND WATER STAT PUHP TEST TEST OWNER/LOG/SCREEN WELL NO.
CONCESSION WELL EASTING ELEV DIA OF fOUN!) LVL lVL RATE TIHE WATER DEPTHS IN fEET TO WIIIC/I
ETC LOT NO NORT/lING FEET DATE DRILLER INS WATER fEET FEET fEET GI'/1 /lR/MN USE FORMATIONS EXTElm
MUNICIPALITY CODE 57010 (CONTINUED. . . )
11785 4930413 BRI'lN SAND 0025 BRWN CLAY SAND 0128 BRWN
SAND 0133 YLLW SAND 0136 (S 0133 03 )
PR E 1 37 57- 602552 1025 11/74 4816 6 FII 120 51 5 2/00 DO WALLACE ()
11861 4930lt88 UNKN SAND 0012 UNKN SAIID GRVL 0051 UNKN
fSND 0093 UNKN tlSND GRVL 0126 (S 0112
Olt ) UNKN fSND OH5 GREY CLAY 0170
PR E 1 37 57- 602395 980 11/74 4816 6 FR 326 H2 15 3/00 DO WALLACE 0
11862 4930332 BRWN SAND 0016 UNKN SAND 0085 UNKN CLAY
GIWL 0119 UUKU SAND 0132 UNKN CLAY GRVL
0252 UNKN FSUD S1LT 0316 (S 0317 Olt )
UUKN liSND 0335
PR E 1 37 57- 602475 1025 Olt/75 3660 5 FR 72 135 5 2/00 DO ABASCO 11ANAGE/IENT
122lt6 4930250 BLCK TPSL 0001 BRWN SAND 0016 GREY SAND
CLAY 0086 GREY SAU!) BLDR GRVL 0098 GREY
CLAY SAND 0142 BRWN SAND CLAY /lARD OH7
BRWN HSND 0153 (S 0150 03 )
PR E 1 37 57- 602465 1000 05/75 3660 5 FR 95 55 55 10 2/00 DO fOllGET M
12247 4930515 RED SAND 0010 BRWN CLAY SAND 0079 GREY
MS/ID CLAY 0095 BRWN MSND GRVL 0102 (S
0099 03 )
PR E 1 37 57- 602420 1000 05/75 3660 5 FR 118 52 60 7 2/00 DO BURtllIAH GEOnGE
122lt8 4930lt60 RED SAND 0020 GREY CLAY 0118 BRWN SAND
GIIVL 0122 (S 0119 03 )
PR E 1 37 57- 602525 1025 08/75 3660 5 fR 108 66 75 6 2/00 DO WIUGIIT JIM
12506 4930lt35 YLLW SAND 00li5 GREY CLAY 0102 BRWN MSND
0108 BRWN CSND 0112 (S 0108 03 )
PR E 1 37 57- 602575 10~5 09/75 3660 5 FR 120 97 105 6 2/00 DO WIIITE JUt
12509 4930ltOO YLLW SAND 0050 GREY SAND GRVL CMTD 0065
GREY CLAY 0120 BRWN liSND GRVL 0125 (S
0122 03 )
PR E 1 37 57- 602625 1060 07/75 1LI52 5 fR 153 120 122 5 2/00 DO BATTAGLIA JOE
12516 4930ltOO BRWN TPSL SAtlD 0002 YLLW GRVl CSND 0079
GnEY CLAY STNS 0096 GnEY /lPAN STNS SAND
0136 YLLW GRVL CSND 0156 GnEY /lPAN STIIS
SAND 0160 BRWN HSND STNS 0167 (S 0164
03 )
PR E 1 37 57- 602525 1015 11/75 3660 5 FR 71 lIlt 4 2/00 DO ABASCO
12640 4930500 RED SAND OOOlt GREY CLAY SAND 0069 RED
HSND CLAY 0066 BRWN fS11D 0099 GREY SAND
GIIVL OtTO 0120 BR~ltI MSND 0123 (S 0120
03 )
PR E 1 37 57- 602600 1125 11/75 120lt 5 fR 23LI 162 205 4 1/00 DO WALKER GRANT
12656 4930390 BIIWN SAUD 0074 BRWN SAND GRVL 0101 GREY
SAND CLAY 0212 GREY SAIID GRVL CLAY 0217
GIIEY SAND CLAY 023LI B IU'IN SAND 0237 (S
023Lt 03 )
-: PR E 1 37 57- 602700 1100 01/76 3660 5 fR 120 98 115 3 2/00 DO /lEISZ I'IAURIC
13262 4930350 BRWN HSND 0061 GREY GRVL CtlTD 0065 GREY
- CONTINUED -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
., - - -
Page 11
WATER WELL DATA SYSTEM 23 OCT 86 PAGE 661 GROUND WATER BULLETIN REPORT
UTl1 CSG KIND WATER STAT PUI-\P TEST TEST OWNER/lOG/SCREEN
CONCESSION WELL EASTING HEV DIA Of fOUND lVl lVl RATE TII'IE WATER DEPTIIS IN fEET TO WIIICII WELL NO.
ETC LOT NO NORTlUNG fEET DATE DRILLER INS WATER fEET fEET fEET GPI1 IIR/NN USE fOI!MATIONS EXTEND [
i
I
I
MUNICIPALITY CODE 57010 (CONTINUED. . . ) 1
CLAY SAND SINS 0103 BRWN SAND DRY 0120
BHWN HSNO 0125 (S 0122 03 )
PR E 1 37 57- 602400 1000 09/78 4816 6 fR 303 138 25 6/00 DO SIIAI!PE T
15600 4930300 SAND CMID 0014 BRWN CLAY 0026 SAND GRVL
CNTD 0047 GI!EY CLAY GHVL lYRD 0107 fSND
CLAY 0119 CLAY DNSE 02118 fSND CLAY l YRD
0263 GREY ClAY 0266 SAND CLAY 0298 CSND
CGVl 0310 (S 0300 03 )
PR E 1 38 57- 601900 945 11/65 4816 6 fR 90 1'1 65 12 24/00 ST DO ItEWITT 11 01'
3078 4930340 PRDG 0015 CLAY HSND 0043 III' AN 0079 fSND
0091 (S 0087 04 )
PR E 1 39 57- 601715 935 08/55 5510 4 fR 58 9 14 5 2/00 DO KENDRICK B
3519 4930610 TPSl 0001 HSND 0011 GRVL 0014 HSND GRVL
0032 tlSND CLAY 0051 (S 0049 09 ) HSND
0058
PR E 1 39 57- 601583 910 11/74 4816 6 fR 122 22 b5 3 3/00 DO WOOIJWARD E
11659 1\930847 SAND GnVL CI1TD 0052 UNKN 0130 (S 0099
06 )
PR E 1 40 57- 601215 910 08/57 2611 .j FR 83 30 80 1 5/00 PS ;)CIIOOL AREA A
3520 '1931394 CLAY HSND 0050 HSND 0083 GRVL HSND 0090
(S 0083 07 )
PR E 1 40 57- 601625 905 08/73 2801 2 245 54 102 14 1/30 GARRETT DEVELOPMENTS 08
10659 4931475 BRWN SAND CLAY SOfT 0013 GREY CLAY GRVL
PCKD 0045 BRWN SAND GRVL CLAY 0098 GREY
CLAY GRVL PCKD 0147 GREY CLAY PCKD 0245
BRWN SAND GRVl CLAY 0290 (S 0253 10 )
GREY SlIlE CLAY SOFT 0302 GREY CLAY GRVL
liARD 0325
PR E 1 40 57- 601535 905 05/75 1204 5 fR 59 17 48 5 1/15 DO WAGAR GORD
12118 4930900 DRWN CLAY 0005 GREY CLAY fSND 0050 GREY
CSND CLAY 0059 GREY SAND 0063 (S 0060
03 )
PR E 2 57- 999999 06/46 2116 5 FR 122 90 110 6 DO ST MURPItY J
3106 9999999 CLAY NStlD STNS 00118 GRVL 0118 SILT 0180
CLAY MSND STNS 0208 GRVl 0212
PR E 2 A 57- 610262 783 09/61 4305 6 FR 57 6 70 II 3/00 CO SUN VAllEY MOTEL
3079 4922045 fR 77 DRWN FSND 0004 GREY CLAY 0024 GrlEY GRVL
CLAY 0057 GRVl 0058 GnEY CLAY HSND 0077
GRVl FSND 0060 (S 0077 03 )
PR E 2 A 57- 610237 783 04/67 4607 30 FR 17 6 2 CO GRYDOR J
3080 4922023 onWN ClAY STNS 0025
PR E 2 A 57- 610405 783 Oll/53 5510 4 DRY DARBY W
3521 4922119 FSND 0004 GRVL MSND 0012 BLUE CLAY 0027
GRVl ClAY 0043 CLAY HSND 0121 STNS CLAY
0123 GRVl CLAY 0161 FSND 0167
PR E 2 A 57- 610077 760 08/54 2801 4 fR 3 50 16 4/00 CO HIPERlAl all
- 3522 1\921961 TPSL 0001 MSND 0003 BLUE CLAY 0004 CLAY
.
NSND GRVL 0009 BLUE CLAY 0037 BLUE CLAY
- rOr/TINUED -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
., - -
Page 12
WATER WEll DATA SYSTEM 23 OCT 86 PAGE 66(1 GROUND WATER BUllETIN REPORT
UTM CSG K IUD WATER STAT PUNP TEST TEST OWNER/lOG/SCREEN WELL NO.
CONCESSION WELL EASTING HE V DIA OF FOUND LVL LVL RATE TII1E WATER DEPTHS IN FEET TO ~IfIlCII
ETC LOT NO NORTtlING FEET DATE DRILLER INS WATER FEET FEET FEET GPI1 Im/I'IN USE FORMATIONS EXTEND
MUNICIPALITY CODE 57010 (CONTINUED. . . )
CLAY 0070 GREY SAND WORG 0076 (S 0073
03 ) GUEY SAND CLAY 0076
PR E 2 17 57- 608600 800 02178 3203 6 FR 62 FLW 15 15 3/00 DO ilEAL V
15203 4924500 BlCK TPSL 0001 BRWN CLAY SNDY 0015 GREY
CLAY SWS 0018 GREY CLAY 0062 GREY SAND
0071 (S 0067 03 )
PR E 2 18 57- 608840 815 06171 4608 30 FR 12 12 21 5 1/00 DO MCLEAN J G
8047 4924900 BRWN CLAY 0005 GREY SAND STNS 0024
PR E 2 19 57- 608430 885 06170 2514 6 DRY HLISB
7273 4925340 TPSL 0003 YLLW MSND GRVL BLDR 0004 BRWN
CLAY BlDR 0016 GREY CLAY 0019 GREY FSND
CLAY 0033 GREY CLAY 0041 GREY CLAY 11StID
GRVL 0102 GREY CLAY GRVL BLDR 0105 GREY
CLAY NSNO 0279
PR E 2 19 57- 608400 875 06179 3203 6 i'R 343 41 260 10 3/10 DO ElLIS 0
16193 4925300 BRWN CLAY sms SAND 0024 GREY CLAY 0074
r.REY GRVL SWS CLAY 008(\ GREY GRVL CLAY
0086 CLAY SILT LYRD 0298 GREY CLAY GRVL
PCKD 0310 GREY GRVL SILT DNSE 0321 GREY
CLAY 0338 GREY GRVL 0340 GREY GRVL CLAY
PCKD 0343 GREY GRVL CLN 0345 GREY GRVL
CLAY 0345
PR E 2 24 57- 606750 1000 12179 3602 6 FR 55 2 58 6 1/00 DO BENTORSWELL CaNST
16570 4926750 BIU~N CLAY HAUD 0020 BRWN CLAY SAND 0040
GREY CLAY SNOS 0055 BRWN SANO WORG 0062
(S 0058 04 )
PR E 2 25 57- 606854 1040 09/6(\ 4816 6 FR 5(\9 208 530 3 6/00 DO CLINE B
3082 4927339 BRWN TPSL CLAY 0018 MSND GRVL 0076 BLUE
CLAY 0084 tlSND 0237 BLUE CLAY 0400 CLAY
SILT 0407 BLUE CLAY 0(196 HSND SILT 0499
BLUE CLAY 0549 GRVL 0552 (S 0549 03 )
PR E 2 25 57- 606560 1000 11170 1830 30 FR 13 10 12 1/00 DO SKINNER SID
7657 4927020 ORWN TPSL CLAY tlSND 0002 GREY CLAY MSND
0013 GREY MSNO CSNO 0014 GREY CLAY MSND
STNS 0020
PR E 2 25 57- 606540 1000 10170 120(\ 5 DRY SK WNER SID
7663 4926990 BRWN CLAY 11SND SINS 0011 GREY CLAY HSND
SINS 0035 GREY CLAY HSNO GRVL 0098 GREY
CLAY tlSND 0210 GREY CLAY 0288
PR E 2 26 57- 607100 1050 08173 4608 30 FR 20 5 3 /30 DO FULTON T
10469 4927550 BRWU CLAY STNY 0023
PR E 2 28 57- 605950 1070 01170 251f1 (, ff! 93 50 75 9 1/30 ST DO VAN OERKEH J 09
699(\ 4928110 PIIOG 0063 GREY HSNO SILT CLAY 0093 YLLW
HSIW 0098 (S 0095 03 )
PR E 2 29 57- 606470 1120 0(1/6(, (,816 6 FR 236 102 220 5 3/00 no PAlnRIDGE ,J 10
310(\ 4928920 liED TPSL HSND 0012 tlSND GRVL STNS 0045
tlSNO 0135 BLUE CLAY 0210 CLAY tlSND 0235
(S 0233 03 ) GRVL 0236
PR E 2 29 57- 606355 1120 08/66 4715 (I FIt 203 103 110 6 2/00 ST DO BARTON J
- CONTINUED -
. - -- -.. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Page 13
WATER WELL DATA SYSTEH 23 OCT 86 PAGE 665 GROUND WATER BULLETIN REPORT
UTH eSG KIND WATER STAT PUNP TEST TEST OWNER/LOG/SCREEN
CONCESSION WEll EASTIUG HEV DIA OF FOUU!) LVl LVl RATE TINE WATER DEPTIIS IN FEET TO WIIlCII WELL NO .
HC LOT NO NORTHING FEEl DATE DRILLER INS WATER FEET fEET fEET GPM IIR/MN USE FOI!HATIONS EXTEND
MUNICIPALITY CODE 57010 (COUTINUED. . . )
3105 49290'16 pRnG 0086 CLAY HSND GRVl 0108 CLAY MSND
SILT 0142 GREY CLAY 0177 GI!EY CLAY SILT
0213 (S 0211 0'1 ) MSND 0215 HSND CLAY
0223
PR E 2 30 57- 605700 1125 03/69 1510 4 fR 170 130 150 10 2/00 ST DO IIEALEY 0 11
6222 4929060 TpSL 0006 GRVL HSND 0130 fSND 0160 MSND
0170 (S 0164 06 )
PR E 2 31 57- 605400 1125 04/78 4816 8 fR 156 145 156 6 2/00 DO WIIITE DAVID
15186 4929150 CLAY sms 0012 SAND GRVL 0156 MSND GRVL
0194 (S 0191 05 ) SAUD CLAY 0209 CLAY
HARD 0236 SAND CLAY GRVl 0297 HSNO GRVl
0311 CLAY GRVL 0320 SAND CHID 0425
PR E 2 32 57- 605650 1200 07/80 3660 5 FR 325 253 290 8 1/00 DO WEBSTER S 12
16906 4929600 BLCK TpSL 0001 BRNN CLAY SAND 0070 BRWN
SAND 0098 GREY CLAY SAND 0188 Blum SAND
liARD 0235 BR~IN SAND CLAY liARD 0325 BRNN
fStm 0329 (S 0325 04 )
PR E 2 33 57- 605475 1170 08/74 3660 5 fR 220 216 222 5 2/00 DO ~IAI1C1II LOON PETER
11456 4930385 BRWN SAUD 0069 DRNN fSND CLAY 0140 BRNN
HSUD 0197 YLLW HSUD 0232 (S 0229 03 )
PR E 2 34 57- 604605 1160 12/57 2611 4 FR 225 195 200 5 2/30 ST DO UIBWEll E 13
3108 4930193 PHDG 0065 CLAY HStlD 0225 CSND 0235 (S
0230 05 )
PR E 2 36 57- 604150 1182 08/73 3203 5 FR 259 232 245 6 2/00 DO BlOWE\. 0 14
10341 4930677 BR~IN TpSl 0001 BRWN SAND GRVL STNS 0025
UHWN SAUD 0117 BnWN CLAY 0138 BRWN SAND
0232 BnWN SAND CLAY 0259 ORWN SAND 0264
(S 0260 04 )
RANGE 1 1 57- 611239 750 09/59 3414 4 FR 241 HW 9 15 8/00 DO IIOLDEN T
3073 4917315 CLAY ULDR 0065 CLAY 0190 SILT 0233 11SND
GRVL 0241 (S 0233 08 )
RANGE 1 1 57- 611481 725 10/64 2514 6 FR 237 7 113 8 12/00 DO IWLplI f
3074 4917300 TPSl 0001 OLUE CLAY 0237 GREY MSUD .0249
(S 0237 12 )
RANGE 1 1 57- 611267 725 12/62 1614 4 FR 153 10 27 5 1/00 DO ROLPH f
3535 4917244 CLAY 0012 MStlD CLAY 0104 HPAN 0132 MSND
CLAY 0148 fStm 0153
RANGE 1 2 57- 611392 810 07/59 2514 6 DRY SUTTON C
3071 4917911 TPSL 0001 ORWN CLAY 0026 BLUE CLAY fSND
0063
RANGE 1 2 57- 611386 810 07/59 2514 6 fR 98 43 65 30 4/00 DO SUTTON C
3072 4917874 IPSL 0001 BRWN CLAY 0026 BLUE CLAY MSND
0063 BLUE CLAY 0096 GRVl 0098
RANGE 1 2 57- 611321 805 10/66 251'1 6 fI1 112 <'15 60 20 3/00 DO BRAND A
3076 4917733 TPSl 0001 BRWN CLAY HSND OLDR 0017 BLUE
CLAY GRVl MStlD 0112 CSUO GnVl 0113
": RANGE 1 2 57- 61140!> 800 01/6'1 4102 30 fR 1'1 FI 3 ST DO SUHQN R
3536 4917753 ORWN CLAY 0005 BLUE CLAY STNS 0014 GRVL
0030
,. - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - -
Page 14
WATER WEll _...A SYSTEM 23 OCT 86 PAGE 563 GROUND WATER [lUllETIN REPORT
UIM CSG KIN!) WATER STAT PUI,IP TEST TEST OWNER/lOG/SCREEN
CONCESSION WEll EASTING HEY VIA OF FOUND LVI. LYL RATE TIllE WATER DEPTIIS IN fEET TO WIIICIf WELL NO.
ETC LOT NO tlORT/1I NG fEET DATE DRILLER INS WATER fEET fEET FEET GI"1 IIR/tlN USE fORtlATIONS EXTEND
Om Township
MUNICIPALITY CODE 57010
C:JN 3 1 57- 60FIFI9G 1200 09/66 2402 '/ fR 1...0 126 180 60 24/00 CO IIORSESIIOE YALLEY lTD 15
3109 4932933 BLUE CLAY 0050 MSlm 0060 BLUE CLAY 0120
"ISND CLAY 0170 1'151m 0180 (S 0173 16 )
GnYL 0201
CON 3 3 57- 605850 )250 10/76 3660 .. 3FI9 278 330 6 2/00 DO HE EYES GORDON 16
13849 \932440 BlCK TPSL 0001 BRWN SAND CLAY STNS 0040
BRWtI SAND GRYl 0093 GREY SAND CLAY CtlTD
01FI5 GREY SAND GnYl ClAY 0160 BRI'm SAND
CLAY 02FI8 GREY CLAY GRYL 0334 GREY fS11D
ClAY SILT 0349 URWN fSlm 0356 (S 0353
03 ) GnEY ClAY GnYL 0356
CON :5 5 57- 999999 07/46 2116 5 FR 83 25 63 5 4/00 DO ST DONALDSON T
3107 9999999 CLAY /oISND STNS 0020 SILT 0080 GRVl 0083
CON 3 5 57- 606152 1175 09/50 2801 RCAF
3110 4930773 DRNN /oISND BLDR 0007 BR~I /oISND GRYl CLAY
0150 BRWN /oISND SILT 0159 BRWN MSND CLAY
0306
CON 3 5 57- 606152 1175 09/67 2402 7 FR 228 202 211 52 72/00 PS OCCUPATIONAL CENTRE 1
3111 4930833 HSND 0068 III' AN 0090 BLDR If PAN 0098 IIPAN
0185 BLDR IIPAN 0212 liP AN 0225 GRVL 0238
(S 0227 10 ) GnYL CLAY 0275
CON 3 5 57- 606172 1175 10/67 2402 7 FR 230 205 220 FI5 72/00 PS EDUCATION CENTRE
3112 4930883 /oISND 0073 BLDR IIPAN 0095 CLAY 0100 If PAN
0190 GnYL CLAY 0228 GRYL 0243 (S 0230
04 ) (S 0234 08 ) GRYL CLAY 0260 CLAY
GnYl 0279
CON 3 5 57- 606247 1175 12/67 2FI02 7 FR 220 202 210 80 72/00 PS EnUCATION CENTnE
3113 4930838 /oIS/1[) 0053 "ISND nLDR 0069 HSND 0081 HSND
BLDR 0098 IfpAtI 01B 1'ISND 016F. III' AN 0212
GRYl CLAY 0218 GRYl 023FI (S 0220 12 )
CON 3 5 57- 605750 1200 10/69 4816 6 FR 280 220 230 18 20/00 DO BARTOli T
6793 4930F.70 /oISND GnYl 0196 FSND 0236 SILT CLAY 0271
/oISIID SILT 0282 HSND GRYL 0288 (S 0284
04 )
CON 3 5 57- 6061FI0 1175 12/70 2FI02 6 Fn 217 195 206 60 72/00 PS AI1ULT ED CENTRE
7823 4930800 HSUD 0055 /oISND BLDR 0122 IIPAN 0204 CSND
02FI0 (S 022(1 04 ) (S 0228 12 ) IISND
0242
- CON 3 5 57- 605600 1160 05/79 3660 5 fn 209 197 200 6 1/00 DO BnIGLEY B
16015 4930550 BRWN SAUD GRYl LYRD 0160 GREY FStlD CHTD
0209 GREY fS11[) slInp 0214 BnWN MSND lOOS
0218 (S 0216 06 ) GIIEY FSND LOOS 0222
CON 3 6 57- 605697 1202 12/72 2514 6 FR 280 253 286 8 1/30 DO SIIITII n
9723 '1930280 II'SL 0001 YLLW SAND GRYl BLDR 0020 GREY
SAND GRYl BLDn 0095 YLLW SAND 0292 (S
0289 03 )
-: COt. 3 7 57- 606030 1200 09/67 4816 6 fR 360 280 285 9 2FI/00 DO WEL LtIlIllOFER G
3114 4929814 BIIWtl foISND CLAY 0272 GREY CLAY 0328 fSND
CLAY 0359 foISND CSND 0368 (S 0360 04 )
- CONTINUED -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - -
Page 15
WATER WELL DATA SYSTEM 23 OCT 86 PAGE 56lt GROUND WATER IJULLETIN REPORT
UIM CSG KINO WATER STAT PUHP TEST TEST OWNER/LOG/SCREEN
CONCESSION WELL EiSTUIG ElEV DlA OF FOUND LVL LVI. HATE TJ~IE WATEn PEPTIIS IN FEET TO WIIICII WELL NO.
HC LOT NO tlORTlHNG FEET PATE DRILLER INS WATER FEET FEET fEET GPI1 1m/I-IN USE fORMATIONS EXTEND
MUNICIPALITY COPE 57010 /CONTINUEO... )
/s 03CA Oft )
CON 3 7 57- 606410 1130 10/63 4816 6 fR 250 182 277 2 8/00 DO WIHGIIT W 18
3115 4929166 Fit 280 liED HSllO STNS 0014 tiS/in GRVl 0036 CSND
STNS 0078 CSUD 02lt7 GREY SILT 0249 GREY
FSNO sINS 0285 (S 0281 03 I
CON 3 7 57- 606150 1245 05/66 4607 30 FR 26 26 2 ST DO BARTON J
3116 4929929 GflEY CLAY 0026 MSNO 0036
CON 3 7 57- 606207 1160 10/73 4816 6 FR 380 105 30 3/00 ST FORSTER J
10928 49291151 SAUD GUVL 0054 ClAY SILT 0266 CLAY STNS
0369 tiS/in 0397 /S 0370 04 ) CLAY 0405
CON 3 7 57- 606200 1160 05/77 3660 5 fR 182 157 165 7 1/00 DO UInWELl B
14283 4929600 nR\'n~ SAND CLAY 0015 GREY SAND CLAY 0106
UHWU SAND DHY Ollt5 GHEY CLAY SAND 0182
YllW MSND 0187 (5 018lt 03 )
CON 3 8 57- 6073l.7 1150 01/74 3660 5 fR 195 165 185 5 2/00 DO MOORE A
10657 4930016 fit 203 TPSl 0001 RED FSNO 0016 REO MSNO oo:n 19
GREY Cl.AY SAND 0105 ORIIN SAUD GRVl 0106
GREY CLAY 0138 GREY FSND OH4 DRWN SAND
CLAY BLUR 0195 GIIEY FSIIIJ 020ft GREY NSNO
0208 (S 020lt 03 )
CON 3 8 57- 607300 1125 07182 3660 5 FR 180 Ft6 170 10 1/00 DO PARRY L
18139 4929600 OlCK TPSl 0001 RED SAND 0030 ORWN SAND
nRY 0180 YllH SAND WOHG 11GlIO 0196 (S
0191 03 I
CON 3 9 57- 606820 1090 01/66 4715 4 FR 20lt 96 120 8 3/00 S1 no NClEAN N
3117 4928583 PIInG 0078 CLAY I1SI/D 0153 GREY CLAY 0204
FS//IJ 0220 (S 0217 03 I
CON 3 9 57- 607920 1150 10/68 4816 6 fR 200 106 142 10 24/00 00 PARTRIDGE 0 D 20
5561 4929050 BUWN CLAY 11SND 0088 GRVL 0092 CLAY STNS
0168 NSNO CLAY GRVl 0189 NSI/O FSNO 0205
/S 0196 Olt ) /S 0200 04 I
CON 3 10 57- 606200 1100 07/70 4715 4 fR 150 20 46 6 5/00 5T DO DWINNELl II R
7695 4928600 CLAY ~ISND BLOR 0120 CLAY tlSND CRYl 0170
/oISNO GRYL 0174
CON 3 12 57- 608881 995 09/73 3203 URY BAlIHGARTEH l
10804 49273lt8 onWN 1PSL 0001 8RWN CLAY 0013 GREY CLAY
GIIVl STNS 0069
CON 3 12 57- 608650 970 09/75 3660 " FR 179 FLW 45 16 2/00 no CINGOLANI PERtH
12504 't927450 DLCK TI'SL 0001 RED SAND 0006 BRWN CLAY
0017 GREY CLAY SILT BLOR 0076 BLUE CLAY
GIIVL OL47 OLUE CLAY BlOR 0177 GIIEY SAND
GRVl 0179 BIIWN NSNO GRVL 0185 /S 0182
03 )
CON 3 13 57- 609090 935 07/68 4713 6 FR 49 20 35 10 2/00 00 SANDERSON C
5441 4927060 TPSL 0002 fiRWN CLAY STNS 0027 OLUE CLAY
STNS 0047 GUVl 0049
-:: CON 3 13 57- 609015 960 08/73 3201 5 FR 46 10 35 7 1/30 DO SANDEIISON 0
10337 4927015 rmHN TPS L 0001 BRHN CLAY GRVL STNS 0025
un~IN GnVL CLAY 00l.6 DHWN CSNo GRVL 0049
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
... - -
Page 16
WATER WELL DATA SYSTEI1 23 OCT 86 PAGE 571 GROUND WATER BULLETIN REPORT
unt CSG KIND HATER STAT PUNP TEST TEST OWIIER/lOG/SCREEN
CONCESSION WELL EASTING HEV DIA Of !'OlJtll) lVl lVL HATE TII1E WATER DEPTIIS IN FEET TO ~IIIICII WELL NO.
ETC LOT NO NORTIIING fEET DATE DRIllER INS WATER fEET fEET fEET GPli IIRINN USE fORl1ATIONS EXTEND
NUNICIPALITY CODE 57010 (CONTINUED. . . )
IS 0082 03 )
CON 3 28 57- 613150 775 08/79 1452 5 fR 61 32 '10 5 3/00 DO BOWl'tAN R
16247 4918350 IJR~IN SAtlD GRVL CtHD 0039 GREY CGVL CSND
CGfm 00&1 IS 00&0 03 ) GREY FSND 0063
GHEY SAND GRVL CNrD 0063
Cott 3 28 57- &13100 7&0 01/82 14&7 5 FR '15 31 38 5 5/30 DO GHAY H
18018 4918300 BRHN TPSL 0001 BRWN SAND STNS CI1TD 0047
BR~/tj HSIID 0052 (S 00'17 05 I
CON 4 1 57- 605213 1020 02/63 2514 6 FR 162 120 155 11 5/00 CO SKI RESOI!T
3173 4933605 BRWN HSNO CLAY 0013 NSND 0047 BLUE foISND
CLAY GRVl 0158 BLUE CLAY 0162 ($ 0160
04 I CSND 0165
CON 4 1 57- 605'100 1050 11/67 4816 6 fR 160 120 190 50 24/00 CO IIORSESIIOE VALLEY 23:
6606 4933500 fR 2'10 PRDR 0164 HStlD CLAY 0183 fSNll 0234 .tSND
CStlD 0260 (S 0244 16 )
CON 4 1 57- 605332 1025 09/73 4816 HORSESHOE V AllEY l TO
10929 4933603 GRVl CLAY 0011 CLAY 0026 SAND CLAY 0076
CLAY GRVL 0146 SAtlD GRVl CLAY 0172 foIStlD
0302 CLAY 0310
CON 4 1 57- 605365 1055 12/75 '1816 16 fR 261 120 179 850 48/00 CO In IIORSESIIOE VAllEY lTD 22
12814 4933575 CLAY GRVL 0038 fStlD 0065 CLAY 0110 CLAY
GRVL 0160 I1SND 0190 SAt/O CLAY LYRO 0220
HSND 0302 IS 0255 '10 )
CON 4 2 57- 606800 1250 12/80 4816 2 BIDHEll G 25:
17693 4933500 SAND 0135 aRWt/ CLAY 0172 GREY CLAY 0210
Nstm 0258 (S 0218 03 ) CLAY FSUD 0267
FStID 0280 CLAY SILT 0350
CON 4 2 57- 606800 1250 03/81 4816 6 179 198 1/00 DO BIDWEll G
17b94 4933600 SAt/!) 0155 ClAY SAND 01b5 NSNO 0194 (S
0187 06 ) CLAY 0200
CON 4 2 57- 60b800 1250 04/81 4816 6 359 360 2 1/00 DO BIDWELL G
17695 4933700 BRWN SAND 0155 CLAY SAND 0205 CLAY SILT
SAND 0375 CLAY 0401 HSND 0(105 SAIl\) SILT
LYIID 0'116 IS 0't11 05 ) SAND SILT 0555
BRWN CLAY 0560 GREY CLAY GnVL 0620
CON 4 5 57- 60691b 1225 10/50 2801 DNII 26'
3174 4931298 ORWN HSND 0007 OR~IN HSND GRVl 0021 BLUE
CLAY liSt/II GRVL 0092 NSND CLAY 0130 fSND
0153 CLAY "'SNll GRVl 0213 CLAY OlOR 0251
I!PAN 0258
CON 4 5 57- 606490 1350 05/66 2'102 7 mw IIEHABI lIT AT10N CENTR
3175 4931600 1.ISlm 0102 GIIVl 0105 foISNO 0157 !lPAN 0219
HSND 0221 /lPAN 0328
CON 4 5 57- 607300 1125 05/80 36&0 5 fR 372 259 325 6 1/00 DO tlllL ()
16719 4931550 Of/WN SAND 0040 BRWN SAtlD nlTD 0132 GREY
CLAY 0236 GREY SAND CLAY /lAnD 0254 GIIEY
SAND DIUY 0260 GHEY CLAY SAtlD 0296 BLUE
CLAY STKY 0355 GIIEY /lPAtI 0372 BRNN NSND
0379 IS 0375 04 )
lflii
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Page 17
WATER WELL DATA SYSTEM
23 OCT 86
PAGE 572
GROUtlD WATER DULLETIN REPORT
UHt CSG KIND HATER STAT PUNP TEST TEST
CONCESSION WELL fASTING fLEV DIA OF rOUND LVL LVL RATE TIHE WATER
ETC LOT NO NOiHIIING FEET DATE DRILLER INS WATER fEET fEET fEET GPH IIR/HN USE
OWNER/lOG/SCREEN
DEPTIIS IN fEET TO ~/lIICII
FORMATIONS EXTEND
MUNICIPALITY CODE 57010 (CONTINUED...)
-
-
-
WELL 00.
CON 4 & 57- &06840 1175 10/50 2801 DNO
3176 4930942 TPSl 0002 HSND GRVl 0020 GRVL I1SND CLAY
0037 FSNO GnVl HAY 0287 HStlD GRVl 0298
IIPAN 0301
CON 4 & 57- 608150 1175 10172 481& ORY fHOWELL G
9282 4931330 SAND GRVL 0035 SAND 0090 CLAY GRVL 0125
GREY CLAY Olli8 SAND GRVL 0190 CLAY GRVL
0270 CLAY 0330
CON 4 6 57- 608180 1175 10/72 4816 ORY BIO~IELI. G
9283 4931340 SAIl\) GIWL 0066 SAND GRVL 013& GREY CLAY
0153 SAND GRVL 0230 CLAY SANn 0275 CLAY
0305
CON 4 6 57- 608157 1170 11172 4816 6 fR 271 203 217 7 3/00 ST DO Bm~IElL G 27
9704 ',931348 SAIII} GRVL 0098 CLAY GRVl 0148 SAND 0271
(S 0269 07 ) CSND 0283 SANO GRVl 0305
CON 4 6 57- 608135 1175 02174 3660 5 FI{ 186 172 185 4 2/00 DO SIIEARDOWN C-B I DI'jELL
10724 4931385 RED SANO 0010 GREY CLAY BlDR SNDY 0070
DIUlN CLAY SAND GRVl 0090 GREY CLAY SNDY
SOFT 0115 BRWN SAND CLAY 0158 GREY CLAY
SUDY 0171 BR~IN FSND 0186 BRWN MStlD 0195
(S 0192 03 )
CON 4 6 57- 607000 1175 06179 3660 5 FR 225 210 210 6 1/00 DO HARSIIAl B
16123 4930800 PIWG 0006 BRWN tiS NO DRY 0060 GREY SAND
CLAY 0096 BRWN HSND BlDR liARD 0135 BRWN
HSND LOOS 0210 GREY SAND GltVL lOOS 0225
GREY SAND CtHO 0228 OIlWN HSNO NGVl 0233
IS 0230 03 )
cot! 4 7 57- 608460 1201 03175 4816 6 FR 297 224 8 6/00 ST DO SIIEARDOWN CECIL
12093 4930800 SAND GIWL 0026 nAY GRVl 0120 SAND CMTD
0214 HSND 0315 IS 0290 03 )
CON 4 8 57- 607480 1125 10/50 2801 OIID
3177 4929957 TPSl 0001 CLAY tlSND 0004 ttSND SILT 0012
CSND 0018 11511D 0099 FSND GnVL CLAY 0159
BLUE CLAY 115110 GnVl 0176 foIS11D GRVL CLAY
0218 \lPAN 0219
CON 4 8 57- 607685 1135 06/66 4816 6 FIl 230 1',7 16'. H 24/00 ST DO WRIGIIT II
3178 4929616 TPSL foISt/D 0004 BRWtI CLAY foISND 0126 MSNO
GIIVl 0205 BLUE CLAY 0215 GflVL CLAY 0219
F5tm CLAY 0226 foISNO 02'10 (S 0229 08 )
CON 4 8 57- 608700 1170 08172 4816 6 FR 220 180 189 12 1/00 ST DO IIAmlDEN II
925'3 4930350 FR 230 SAIID STNS 0017 SAND 0123 NSNO FSND 0230
IS 0220 04 )
cot, 4 8 57- 607630 1130 10176 't816 6 fll 378 158 100 4/00 co IJIVINE /lAROLO
13882 4929650 SAN!) DOll, oRlm CLAY 0023 SAND GRVL 0035
SAtm CLAY 0118 SAtlD GRVL 0160 CLAY GRVL
0288 CLAY SAtlU I.Ynu 037't IS 0371 20 )
- HSNO FSUO 0(,20 CLAY 0452
..
COI~ 4 9 57- 609026 1100 07167 4816 " FR 1',0 30 13', 10 20/00 ST DO SLESSOR 0
- CONTINUED -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Page 18
WATER WELL DATA SYSTEM 23 OCT 86 PAGE 573 GROUND ~IATER OULLETIN REPORT
UTl1 CSG K ItID WATER STAT pUNP TEST TEST oWNErULoG/SCREEN
CONCESSION WELL EASTING ELEY DIA OF FOUND LYL LYL RATE TII-IE WATER DEPHIS ItI FEET TO ~IIIlCII WELL NO.
ETC LOT NO HoRTlIING fEET DATE DRILLER INS WATER FEET fEET fEET GPI1 Im/l-IN USE fORMATIONS EXTEND
MUNICIPALITY CODE 57010 (CONTI NUED. . . )
3179 ',929703 ORWN CLAY MSIID GRYL 0096 GREY CLAY 131132
I' SlID 13128 I1SNo GRYL CLAY 131513 (S 13142
03 ) (S 0145 03 )
CON 4 113 57- 608728 10713 12/66 4715 4 FR 56 24 44 4 2/1313 ST DD EYERETT M
3180 4928761 CLAY NSIW 0030 CLAY NSND GRYL 13058 (S
13056 03 ) NSNn BLDR 0059
CON 4 113 57- 609550 1075 12/69 46138 30 FR 15 15 27 5 1100 DO BDtJNEY RENA 30
6875 4929080 fH 30 oRlm CLAY STNS 0029 GREY GRYL 0030
CDN 4 11 57- 609725 11356 02/B 32133 5 fR 161 60 70 5 2/313 DO GEORGE
9734 4928824 arum SAND FILL 0001 OLCK TPSl 0002 ORWN
CLAY sms 13015 GREY SAND CLAY STNS 0026
GREY SAtlD CLAY 0105 G!~EY CLAY 0181 GREY
SAIII) CLAY 0184 (S 0181 03 )
CDN 4 11 57- 609590 1075 132/76 36613 5 FR 67 2 27 20 2/00 DO JOIINSOtl LAURENCE
12983 4929010 oLCK TPSl. 0001 oRWN CLAY SNDY 0065 GREY
Cl.AY SNDY 0087 Yl.LW CSND 0090 (S 0087
133 )
CON 4 11 57- 6096113 1075 01/75 3203 5 FR 163 30 75 7 15/00 DO GEORGE L
13386 4928900 BR~jN TpSL 0001 BRWN SAND GRYl CLAY 0014
GREY CLAY SAtlD SILT 0092 GHEY CLAY 0183
GREY GRYl. SAtlD 0183
Cotl 4 11 57- 609590 1075 08/76 25l't 6 fR 86 1 67 3 3/00 DO TilE IIITCIIIIOUSE lTD
13592 4926960 OIlWN FI LL 0001 ORlm SAND CLAY BLDR 00213
GIIEY CLAY SILT GRYL 0086 GREY SAND SILT
FGYL 13089 (S 0086 03 )
CON 4 11 57- 609600 1075 08/76 2514 6 FR 107 102 9 1/00 DO HIE IIIlCIIOUSE LTD
13593 4928950 ORWN GRYL FILL 0003 ORWN SAND CLAY 0019
GREY SILT SAtlD CLAY 0107 YLLW SAtlD SILT
LYltD 0112 (S 0109 03 )
CON 4 11 57- 609650 1065 08/77 1452 5 FR 42 Fl.W 8 4 36/00 DO CRYER oROS
14666 4926850 fR 80 OIlNN GIIYL FILL SAtlD 0005 ORWN CLAY STNS
0020 GREY IIPAN STNS 00'113 GREY CLAY SOFT
C050 GREY Cl.AY SAND 0076 GREY CLAY SAND
CIHn 0061
CON 4 11 57- 6139700 1060 0't/77 4606 30 FR 20 5 no GROOT KEN
149213 4928800 oRWN CLAY STNY 0017 SAND 0020 ORWN CLAY
smy 0025
CON 4 13 57- 610200 1000 09/70 ',608 30 FR 6 6 11 6 1/00 DO SHITII KENtlETII
7477 4927910 fR 12 GIIEY CLAY STNS 0010 GREY GRYL STNS 0012
CON 4 13 57- 609320 9',0 12/71 ',608 30 I'll 16 16 25 3 1/30 ST DO IIU1CllltlSON T
8543 4926900 BRWN CLAY SAND 0032
CON 4 14 57- 610265 635 09/63 1614 6 fR 29 1', 20 15 1/00 DO STAI!CUUK J
3181 4925327 BRI-IN CLAY 0012 UPAtI 0025 GRYL 13029
CON " 15 57- 610950 925 10/79 ',606 30 FR 25 3 DO I.I Y lUGS TON 0
16546 4926250 BRWN CLAY SHIV 0025 SAtlD 0026
COU 4 16 57- 610260 870 12/71 4608 30 FR 15 15 19 2 1/00 DO SPALL
8537 4925400 BlUm CLAY STNS 0010 GREY SAND CLAY 0023
Cotl 4 .16 57- 610500 695 09/74 3203 6 FR 275 80 210 5 2/30 DO BAXTER R
- CONTINUED -
- - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
Page 19
~IATER WELL DATA SYSTEl1 23 OCT [16 PAGE 576 GROUND WATER DULLETIN REPORT
UT/1 CSI. KIND ~IA'I ER STAT PUHP TEST TEST OWNER/LOG/SCREEN WELL NO.
CONCESSION WElL EAST ING HEV DIA ')1' FOUND LVI. !.'vL RATE TUIE WATER DEPTIIS HI FEET TO WIIICII
ETC lOT NO NmUlIING fEET DATE DRILLER IN~ WATLR FEET fEET fEET GPH IIR/HN USE fORMATIONS EXTEND
MUNICIPALITY CODE 57010 (CONTINUED... )
17435 (t91 'H50 PRDG 0034 GREY CLAY 010lt GREY CLAY SAND
SILT 0130 GIIEY SAtin GnVL 013't GRVL 013fl
COIf 4 28 57- 61f,350 800 06/81 3660 5 fR 100 50 97 3 1/00 DO NCKENZIE D
17598 4919500 BR~/tI CLAY 0015 GREY CLAY 0100 nnlm SAND
GRVL lOOS 0114 (S 0105 03 I BRWtI SAND
0122 YllW SAND LOOS 0125 BRWN SAND 0147
GREY CLAY 0147
CON 5 1 57- 606900 1255 06173 (1816 6 DRY J>IOORE G
10058 4934435 SAtlD 0059 GRVl 0065 SAND cmD 0103 fGVL
0111 CLAY OBI fGVL 0144 HSND 0210 CLAY
SLTY 0227 CLAY DNSE 0272 CLAY SLTY 0307
CLAY DtlSE 0315
CON 5 1 57- 606675 1275 05174 4713 6 FR 153 150 165 5 2/30 DO VUSTALLO ALBERT 3
11472 4934065 Bm~N SAND GRVL STNS 0150 (S 0147 24 )
BRWN SAND lOOS 0153 BRWN SAND GRVL DUSE
0171
CON 5 5 57- 608050 11 90 04179 3660 5 FR 215 20fl 210 5 2/00 DO DO~II'IAN H 32
15987 4931950 ULCK TPSL 0006 BRNN MSND 0040 BRIm FSND
liARD LYRO 0080 Dm~N CLAY 0106 GREY CLAY
GRVI. liAR!) 0116 GREY SAND GRVL cmD 0222
IS 0119 03 )
CON 5 6 57- 608196 1180 06/52 5510 4 fR 234 226 230 5 1/00 ST DO IIUTCIII NSON E
3207 4931487 TPSL 0006 GRVl STNS 0048 NSNO 0081 CLAY
0086 FSHO oon CLAY HSND 0104 MStlD 0131
CLAY 0139 NSUD 0142 CLAY OJft3 HSND 0191
l'ISIm CLAY 0230 11SND 0244 IS 0234 10 )
CON 5 6 57- 608200 1175 12/70 (,IH6 6 I'll 260 21(1 251 8 2(1/00 ST DO B I lJI~ELl GLENN 33
7841 4931520 I-ISIIO 0022 MSUD GRVL 0066 CLAY GRVL 0188
FSlm 02~6 MSND Fsrm 0265 IS 0258 06 )
GREY CLAY 0270
CON 5 7 57- 609670 1175 07172 (,816 (, FR 260 197 206 12 1/00 DO IWSS A
9300 4'H1500 SAIID 01(.0 SAND SILT 01B8 SAND 0201 SILT
0213 SAND 0256 f$ND H$HD 0265 IS 0257
08 ) GREY CLAY 0335
CON 5 7 57- 609435 1220 06/75 3660 DRY K lNG J-HlNGER P
12256 (1931775 BlCK TPSL 0001 RED SAND 0020 YLLW SAND
DRY 0095 ORWN SAND 0115 OR~IN CLAY 0205
nRWN CLAY STNS 0234 nRWN SAND DRY 0272
GREY CLAY 0330
CON 5 7 57- 609435 1220 10175 4816 6 fR (,56 239 30 3/00 DO WIIIGER PAUL
12654 4931775 SAtlD GUVL CIHD 0082 I1Stm 0108 GREY CLAY
0113 SAUD 0246 GHEY CLAY SILT Of,f,2 CSND I
0456 (S Of If, 7 04 I i
CON 5 7 57- 608550 1225 09/80 3660 5 I'll 285 275 211ft 5 1/00 DO III LL S 34\
17027 4930900 BRWN SAUD PRY 0285 YllW 11SND FSND 0300
(S 0296 03 ) GHEY CLAY 0300
-: CON 5 7 57- 608450 1200 M/81 3660 5 fR 267 255 275 (I 1/00 DO HACKETT G
17429 4931050 DlCK TPS!. 0001 ORI'IN SAtlD GRVL 0085 BRWN
SAND 0267 YLlW fSND WORG 0285 (S 0282
- COtHINUED -
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - -
Page 20
WATER WELL DATA SYSTEM 23 OCT 86 P,AGE 579 GROUND WATER BULLETIN REPORT
UHI CSG K nm WATER STAT PUI'II' TEST TEST OWNER/LOG/SCREEN
CONCESSION WEll EASTING HEY DIA Of fOUND LVL lVL RATE TII'IE WA TER IJEPTIIS IN fEET TO WIIlC/I WELL NO.
ETC LOT NO NORTtIING fEET DATE DRILLER INS WATER fEET fEET fEET GPH \lR/MII USE fom1A nOlls EXTEIn>
MUNICIPALITY CODE 57010 (CONTINUED. . . I
03 )
CON 5 8 57- 608900 1170 10/71 120ft 5 fR 153 137 151 2 1/30 ST DO IIAYES M
8fl46 4930400 BUWN CLAY NSND 0068 GREY tlSND GRVL 0073
GHEY HSNO CLAY 0105 GREY CLAY 0153 BRWtI
HSND 0159 IS 0156 03 )
CON 5 9 57- 609096 11ft5 10/52 5510 4 DRY BIIJWElL G
3208 4930080 TPSL 0002 FSND CLAY 0300
CON 5 9 57- 609091 1135 06/66 4816 6 FR 150 65 95 11 2ft/DO DO BIDWEll G 35:
3209 4929979 GRVL IIPAN 0078 tlSND CLAY 0145 CSND 0155
(S 0147 Ofl I
CON 5 10 57- 609823 1080 07/63 ft816 {. FR 21 6 69 3 3/00 DO OCKEtIDEN H
3210 4929275 FII 60 TPSL HStlD STNS 0008 BLUE CLAY 0012 GRVL
0016 DRWN CLAY 0021 GRYL 0025 BRWN CLAY
HSND STNS 0060 tlSND GllYL 0075 IS 0071
03 I
CON 5 10 57- 609900 1080 11/75 3660 5 80 9 50 2 2/00 DO ClACK
12638 ft929335 DLCK TPSL 0001 DRWN CLAY 0032 GREY CLAY
SIIOY 0058 Dn~at CLAY SIIOY 0067 GREY CLAY
SAIID GRYL 0087 BLUE CLAY GRYL 0094
CON 5 10 57- 609725 1075 09/75 {IB16 6 Fn 89 8 80 3 8/00 DO BI1JWELL ROSS
12852 4929215 SANn GRVL CI1TD 0078 SAND CLAY 0069 (5
0083 05 )
CON 5 10 57- 609500 1090 11/76 4816 6 Fn 120 3 15 1/00 DO ~IEST ORO BAPTIST CII
13690 4929260 FILL 0002 BRWN CLAY GRVL 0014 SAND GRVL
CHTD 0090 SAND CLAY LYRD 0132 (S 0115
05 I CLAY GRYL 01~5
CON 5 10 57- 609950 1080 01/76 3203 6 FR 151 75 120 10 (t/OO DO SPROULE R 36
14160 4929380 BRWN TPSL 0001 BRWN CLAY SAND 0052 GREY
SAIII) CLAY 008~ GHEY CLAY 0151 GREY SAND
ul54 (S 0151 03 I Gf/EY SAUD CLAY 015{.
CON 5 10 57- 609960 1080 06/76 3203 5 FR 98 10 80 5 1/30 DO SPIWULE RON
14189 4929350 aRlm CLAY SAND 0008 GREY CLAY SAND 0098
GREY SAND GRVL 0101 (S 0098 03 I
COM 5 10 57- 609850 1075 11/79 3660 5 FR 19f1 77 71 10 3/00 DO CLACK J
16523 4929300 PRUG 0080 GREY CLAY GRYL 0116 BRWN GRVL
CLAY 0135 GnEY CLAY 0186 GREY SAtlD CLAY
019~ ORWN /1SND fSt/U 0197 (S 019ft Oft I
CON 5 11 57- 6096ft7 1075 10/66 4816 6 FR 109 7 110 3 {,8/00 DO ASH E
3211 (1929075 liP AN 0062 GREY FSND 0069 CLAY HSND 0103
GRVL OIOft CLAY 0106 FS/ID 0109 CSt/D 0118
(S 0109 03 )
CON 5 11 57- 610950 1030 0{1/79 {1816 6 FR 395 230 25 1/00 DO WI LK INS ON J
16084 4'.129350 SAtU> 0019 SAtlD GRVL CLAY 0076 CLAY 0100
SANU CLAY CHTO 0255 SAND CHTO 0395 CSIIO
0',06 (S 0399 03 I
CON 5 12. 57- 61032.8 1035 08/66 481& 6 fR 190 45 165 2 24/00 SI DO DOBSON R
3212 {1928562 /lPAN 0018 BLUE CLAY 0022 /lPAN 0048 BLUE
CLAY SILT 0073 /-ISlm GRVL CLAY 0086 BLUE
- CONTINUED -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - I
Page 21
WATER WELL DATA SYSTEt1 23 OCT 86 PAGE 586 GROUflD WATER OULLETIN REPORT
um CSG KIND WATER STAT PUB I' TEST TEST OWNER/LOG/SCREEN WELLiNO.
CONCESSION WELL EASTING HEV DIA OF FOUNI) LVL LVL UATE lIt-IE WATER nEHIIS IN FEET TO limCII
ETC LOT NO NORTlIING fEET DATE DRILLER INS WATER fEET fEET FEET GPI-I /lR/IoIN USE fORMATIONS EXTEND
MUNICIPALITY CODE 57010 I CONTINUED. . . I
16713 4920300 ORWH SAND 0002 B R~ltl SAtlD CLAY BLDR 0006
GUEY SILT CLAY SAND 0050 GREY SAND SILT
0055 IS 0051 0'1 I
CON 5 28 57- 616550 750 08/80 2514 6 fR 44 6 30 20 1/00 DO tlYSZKOIiSKIJ tI
17134 4920400 TPSL DKCL 0001 BRliN SAND CLAY BLDR 0005
GREY SILT SAtlD CLAY 0044 YLLW SAND SILT
0049 YLLW fGVL 0049
CON 5 28 57- 616450 750 05/81 3660 5 fR 45 10 13 2 10/00 DO DESROCIIES S
11'128 4920400 OLCK TPSL 0001 o R~IN CLAY OLDR 0018 GREY
CLAY GRVL 00l,5 GnEY CGVL CSND 0046
CON 5 28 57- 516400 750 06/81 3660 5 fR 73 10 58 5 1/00 DO DEsrWCIIES S
17490 4920350 PRDG 0045 GREY CGVL CSND 00116 GREY GRVL
CHTn 0073 YLLW SANO ~lBnG 0076 (S 0073
03 I
CON 6 7 57- 609750 1170 08175 4816 6 fR 385 212 30 3/00 DO SUTIIERLAND ED 37
12843 4931875 SAllO GRVL 0030 CLAY GRVL 0084 SAND GRVL
CIHI) 0247 CLAY Dt/SE 0308 SAtlD CHm 0376
CSND 0395 (S 0377 04 I
CON 6 8 57- 6098411 1175 0417'1 3660 5 fR 219 193 193 5 2/00 DO CRITTENDEN WM
10960 4931437 RED SANI) BLnR 0096 GREY SILT CLAY 0148
GREY CLAY 0221 YLLW SAND GRVL 0225 IS
0222 03 I
CON 6 8 57- 610050 1190 05178 4816 6 fR 200 161 195 4 2/00 DO IIIL TZ tl 38
15192 4931050 CLAY SAND 0005 SAND GRVL 0072 GRVL 0077
SAtlD GRVL 0120 CLAY GnVL 0127 SAND CHm
0177 SAND GRVL CLAY 0216 (S 0205 04 I
OLUE CLAY 0229 SAND ClnD 0320
CON (, 9 57- 610106 1190 Oll174 3660 5 fR 255 206 239 3 2/00 DO BOLECllmlSKY M
10959 4930920 OR~IN TPSL 0001 RED SAND 0045 GREY CLAY
SILT 0160 GREY CLAY 0255 ORliN I1SND 0260
(S 0257 03 I
CON (, 11 57- 612183 1025 01/65 4008 30 fR 28 28 2 DO EENlIoonN P
3252 4930144 I-ISIID 0028 CLAY MSND 0035
CON (, 11 57- 611603 1100 06173 4816 6 fR 200 73 30 2/00 DO SIIIEK P
10055 4930054 SAND 0037 GRVL 0047 FStlD 0070 CLAY SAND
0123 CLAY GnVL 0164 NSIW 0210 (S 0191
Ol, I
CON 6 11 57- 611900 1060 06178 3660 5 FR 97 39 10 2/00 no DERKS J
15327 4930100 OLCK TPSL 0001 BRWN SAND 0050 BLUE CLAY
0090 BRHN SAND CLAY 0097 Brum SAND fGVL
LTCL 0100 IS 0097 03 )
CON (, 12 57- 612511 970 03/7't 3203 5 fR 57 17 52 2 2/30 DO NALLINSOfI J
11202 4929618 ormN TPSl 0002 BRHtI SAND GRVL CLAY 0034
GHEY CLAY 0057 (S OU56 U3 I GREY FSND
0059
CON 6 III 57- 612880 1000 10/72 4608 30 fR 27 27 30 2 1/00 DO IIOFHlAN J tI
9422 4928800 Bln/N CLAY STNS 0015 GREY CLAY STNS 0035
CON 6 14 57- 613000 1000 07179 3660 5 fR 67 31 55 4 2/00 DO III LL "
- CONTINUED -
. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Page 22
WATER WELL DATA SYSTEM 23 OCT 66 PAGE 591 GROUND WATER OULLETIN REPORT
U1I1 CSG KItH! WATER STAT PUI'IP TEST TEST OWIIER/LOG/SCREEN
CONCESSION WELL EASTING HEV DIA Of fOUIID LVL LVL RATE TII'IE WATER DEf)TlIS IN fEET TO WIIlCII WELL NO.
ETC LOT NO 1I0RT/IING fEET DATE DRILLER INS WATER fEET fEET fEET GPI1 IIR/HN USE fORMATIONS EXTEND
MUNICIPALITY CODE 57010 (CONTINUED... )
CON 6 26 57- 617600 725 09/76 3203 5 fR 42 flW 20 8 4/00 DO ItULf A
14209 4921(,90 OLCK TPSL 0001 BRWN CLAY 0012 GREY CLAY
0037 GREY SAND CLAY 0042 GREY SAND WORO
0046 (S 0043 03 )
CON 6 28 57- 616700 735 10/77 4793 6 fR 280 flW 3 4/00 DO BRmlN W 0
15056 4920700 ORWN TPSL LOas 0006 GREY CLAY STNY DNSE
0120 GREY OLDR GRNT Ll1SN 0134 GREY CLAY
SAIID DIISE 0234 GREY UlSN DIISE LYRD 0260
CON 6 28 57- 616700 725 10/79 2514 6 fR 32 16 20 1/00 DO SIIOOK J
16717 4920400 OIlWN SAND STNS 0002 ORWN SILT SAND BLDR
0007 GREY SILT ClAY SAND 0032 GREY SAIID
GRVL SILT 0036 GREY GRVL 0036
CON 7 2 57- 609321 1010 12/73 4816 6 fR 212 114 125 50 5/00 11U AOASCO IIIC 39
10941 4935376 SAND GRVL STNS 0091 SAND SILT 0122 GREY
SugarbJsh Well 2 - see end of 'I'able 1 CLAY SAND 0212 MSND 0285 (S 0247 09 )
CLAY 0290
CON 7 6 57- 610400 1175 07/76 4816 6 FR 234 202 10 2/00 DO IIAIDLE'S ANTIQUES 40
13563 (,933200 fSND 0047 CLAY GRVL 0176 GRVL 0200 MSND
0215 CSND 0235 (S 0226 04 ) SAND GIIVL
CHTD 0260
CON 7 6 57- 611000 1075 06/81 3135 5 iR 156 156 180 5 3/00 DO IIOUIES B
18049 4933750 SArli) GRVL DRY 0156 SAND 0190 (S 0187
03 )
CON 7 7 57- 611820 1125 07/70 5206 :> fR 216 40 200 8 6/00 ST OOLTON W 41
7661 '1933250 BRWN NSIID 0044 SILT 0216 FSND 0226 (S
0222 0(1 )
CON 7 9 57- 612523 1125 07/55 5510 4 FR 1(19 130 133 1 /30 DO HCNIVEN W 42
3268 4932066 TPSL 0002 MSIID STNS 0014 CLAY ~ISNO STNS
oo:n CLAY GIIVL 0101 CLAY I1SIIO 01(12 IISIIO
01(19
CON 7 9 57- 612650 1190 09/74 3203 6 FR 164 127 153 2 1/00 DO POIlTEn HARG
11628 4931965 ORl/N SAIID GRVL STNS 0022 BR~IN SAND lOOS
OO{IO CRUll SAIID GRVL PCKD 0164 BRWN GRVL
SArli) WUIIG 0167 (S 0164 03 )
CON 7 9 57- 612600 1125 05/75 2514 6 FR 278 20(1 266 6 24/00 DO RDEIINEn GOnDEN
13106 4932030 GIIVL SAIID 0007 GRVL SAND SILT 0077 YLlW
SAND 0109 BRWN CLAY SAND 0152 GREY CLAY
0173 GHEY CLAY SILT 0278 SAND LynD PCKD
0282 (S 0278 O{I )
CON 7 10 57- 611820 1190 06/71 4715 4 FR 272 167 190 4 2/00 DO PAIIKE 0
8728 4930930 TPSL 0001 11SND 0010 CLAY MSIID GRVl 0025 43
HSIID 01(,5 CLAY HSNO GRVL 0272 fSND 0276
(S 0273 03 )
CON 7 11 57- 612158 1060 10/65 4715 4 fll 1(,2 61 62 10 2/30 no NICIIOLS J
3269 4930305 HSNIJ 0005 ORVl CLAY BLDR 0053 CLAY I1SI/O 44
OLOn 0097 . CLAY "'SUO 0130 I1SUD SILT 0142
- NStlD 01 {18 (S 014(1 0'1 )
CON 7 11 57- 612800 1050 05/80 (,816 6 FR 190 30 3/00 DO STARR T
- COIITItlUED -
- - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - -
Page 23
WATER WEll DATA SYSTfI1 23 OCT 86 PAGE 598 GROUND WATER BUllETIN REPORT
UTI-I CSG KIND WATER STAT PUMP TEST TEST ONtIER/lOG/SCREEN
CONCESSION WEll EASTING HEV UIA OF I'OUND LVL LVL RATE TINE WATER UEPTIIS IN FEET TO WIIICII WElL NO.
ETC LOT NO NORlIIlNG FEET DATE URILLER INS WATER FEET fEET fEET GI'Ii \lR/I1N IJSE FORMATIONS EXTEND
MUNICIPALITY CODE 57010 (CONTINUED... )
CON 7 27 57- 618lt00 725 09/78 1452 5 FR 223 156 5 1/00 DO EDWARDS .J
15526 4922300 BR~IN TPSL FILL 0005 GREY CLAY GRVL BLDR
0020 GREY \lPAN STNS IIARIJ 0103 GREY CLAY
0170 GREY \lI'AN ,sINS SAND 0192 GREY CLAY
SOFT 0223 (S 0222 03 ) BRWN SAND CLAY
0226 GREY CLAY SOFT 0226
CON 7 27 57- 618200 725 06/78 3135 FR 215 Fl.W 3 7 6/00 DO KUCK K
15899 4922050 TPSL 0001 BRWN CLAY SINS 0011 GREY CLAY
STNS 0048 GREY CLAY SAND GRVl 0115 GREY
CLAY 0215 GREY GUVl SAND 0215
CON 7 27 57- 618350 750 09/78 3135 5 FR 213 22 5 18/00 DO MAUCII C
15905 4922350 Bm~N CLAY STNS 0010 GREY CLAY STNS 0083
GIIEY C LA Y 0190 GUEY CLAY SILT SAND 0213
GI!EY SAND GRVL 0215 GREY GRVL 0215
CON 7 27 57- 617500 750 11/79 3203 6 FR 189 6 19 8 1/30 DO BOOm-IAN v
16547 4921600 PUUG 0015 BRWN CLAY SAND 0019 GREY CLAY
0123 GREY CLAY GRVL 0142 GREY CLAY 0189
GREY SAND 0197 (S 0194 03 ) GREY FSND
0199
CON 8 1 57- 609915 920 07/74 3203 6 FR 60 40 52 8 1/00 DO NEWELL NORt1AN
11183 4936550 DUWN CLAY 0015 BRWN SAND STNS CLAY 0060
BUHt~ SAND WBUG 0070 (S 0067 03 )
CON 8 1 57- 609900 925 03/78 3fl13 30 FR 25 22 32 5 {I/OO DO OUI! F 45
17597 4936600 BRNN CLAY 0025 CGVL 0030 BRWN CLAY 0048
CON 8 2 57- 611400 950 10/71 3203 5 FR 75 40 63 2 1/30 DO \lARE .J
8508 4936640 FR 77 BRWN TPSL 0001 CLAY STNS oo:n SAND 0071
(S 0074 03 )
CON 8 2 57- 610250 925 08/76 3203 5 FR 150 47 55 15 2/00 DO TORPEY LARRY 46
14203 4936030 BRNN SAND 0017 BRWN CLAY 0020 GREY CLAY
0121 BRWtl CLAY SANU 0126 GIIEY CLAY 0150
GREY CSND 0156 (S 0153 03 )
CON 8 3 57- 611550 975 11/79 3203 6 FR 105 60 78 15 1/25 DO tlCNIVEtI E
165{19 4935800 BIUItI CLAY STNS SAND 0067 GREY CLAY 0105
Bm.ltI SAtlD GRVL 0111
CON 8 4 57- 611850 950 06/80 3135 5 FR 35 35 42 5 1/30 DO AnIOOI) K
17440 4935200 BRWtI SAND DRY 0035 SAND 0037 UNKN 0053
(S SAND Ofl )
CON 8 7 57- 612485 1180 04/57 1510 2 FR 135 125 125 5 ST DO GRAVES W
3302 49332{15 PlmR 0090 CLAY STNS 0135 IiSND 0145 (S
0141 04)
CON 8 7 57- 613090 1100 01/75 3203 5 FR 137 75 120 7 1/30 DO WALSIt PETER
13415 4833900 onWN SAND DRY 0067 ORWtl SILT CLAY 0103
GHEY CLAY 0137 BnWN SAtm 0141 (S 0138
03 ) BlUm SAND CLAY Olli1
CON 8 8 57- 612{,50 1170 12/74 3660 5 FR 1'15 131 1fl0 {I 2/00 ST DO tlIDDlETOtl RODERT 47
11786 4932625 REO SAtlD 0020 BRWN SA/IO GRVL LYRD 0106
BRI'ItI CLAY OB{, BRllN SAtlO CI1TD 0145 YLlW
SAND 0150 (S 0lfl7 03 )
caN 8 9 57- 613640 1000 03/76 3203 !> FR 11\0 125 3 2/00 DO CLII-IE DARRElL
- CONTINUED -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Page 24
WATER WEll DATA SYSTEM 23 OCT 86 PAGE 599 GROUNU WATER BUllETIN REPORT
UTtI CSG KIND HATER STAT pUtlp TEST TEST OWNER/lOG/SCREEN
CONCESSION WELL EASTING HEV DIA OF FOUlm lVl lVl RAlE TIt-IE WATER DEPTHS IN FEET TO WIIICI{ WELL NO .
HC lOT NO NORTlIING FEET UATE DRILLER INS WATER FEET FEET FEET Gpl1 IIR/NN USE FORMATIONS EXTENU
MUNICIPALITY CODE 57010 (CONTINUED... )
14170 4933100 BRI'lN SAND DRY 0060 BRWN SAND GRVl 0092
BRNN SAND ClAY 0180 IS 0179 03 ) BRWN
SANU 01112
CON 8 9 57- 613600 1050 08/78 4816 6 FR 245 95 15 2/00 DO ASJ/H A
15582 4933100 SANU GRVl 0124 SAND GRVl CtlTO 0207 FSND
SILT 0232 FSNU tlSNU 0257 (S 02(19 04 )
FSNU SILT 0287 SAIIlI GRVL CMTO 0304 BLUE
CLAY STUS 0307
COIl 8 10 57- 614124 1060 07166 4713 6 FR 135 60 120 10 3/00 ST DO ~IOODRON G
3303 4932118 TPSL 0002 CLAY STNS 0060 tlSND CLAY 0130
(S 0127 03 ) !ISNU GRVl 0135
CON 8 10 57- 613(150 1050 06/69 4713 6 fR 136 45 100 25 2/30 DO BEATON E
7010 4931900 FR 1(10 Bn~IN tlSND BlDR 0020 BfUlN CLAY BlOR 0090
[jR~IN IISND 0140 (S 0131 09 )
CON 8 11 57- 614164 1060 03/66 2514 fR 103 (16 90 7 2/00 ST DO tlUlKUS I
3304 4932008 PflUG 0075 BRWN CLAY !ISND GRVL 0102 CSND
GRVL 0103
CON 8 14 57- 614490 968 08/73 1204 5 fR 50 22 50 4 2/00 DO BULHER W
10226 4929375 GREY CLAY 0010 GREY CLAY SILT SAND 0050
BRNN SAND 0062 (S 0059 03 )
CON 8 15 57- 614830 1010 02/62 3715 30 fR 50 30 (10 2 24/00 DO pnoPER A
3305 4928729 HSND 0054
CON 8 15 57- 614845 1000 05/65 4713 6 fR 77 40 70 10 3/00 PS ORa TWP GARAGE
3306 4928684 TPSL 0002 CLAY MSND 0040 fSNO 0070 CSND
0077 (S 0070 07 )
CON 8 15 57- 614702 1005 08/73 1204 5 FR 90 (10 90 4 2/00 00 PROPER A
10229 4928993 BHI'lN CLAY SAND 0010 GREY CLAY 0030 GREY
CLAY SILT 0040 BRWN SAND 0050 GREY SILT
0070 GREY CLAY 0090 BRWN SAND 0101 IS
0097 03 )
CON 8 16 57- 615071 1000 10/65 4715 4 fR 99 18 55 10 6/00 ST DO BIHGGS N
3307 4928789 TPSL 0001 BRWN CLAY BlOR 0040 GREY CLAY
0065 HStIU GRVL CLAY 00')9 tlSUO 0103 Is
0099 04 )
CON 8 16 57- 614950 1000 05/79 3660 5 fR 60 flW 25 15 1/00 00 CARUIFF W
16014 4928700 DR~IN CLAY 0005 GREY CLAY BLDR 00(t5 GREY
CLAY SLTY 0058 GREY SAND 0060 DRWN SAND
0063 IS 0060 03 )
- CON 8 17 57- 616434 980 07/73 4608 30 FR 15 25 4 /30 DO FINLAYSON L
10505 4928512 Bmm CLAY SlNS 0040
CON 8 17 57- 615250 1000 09/82 1{t67 6 FR 92 l(t (11 5 9/00 00 VICIC J
18206 4928050 ULCK TPSL 0001 BnWN SAND CLAY STNS 0034
GnEY CLAY SANU 0062 GREY GRVL CLAY 0092
GREY CSNU CtHD 0100 (S 0095 05 )
CON 8 21 57- 616903 930 11/61 {1102 30 FR 18 10 1 DO t-!CLEAN A
3275 4925507 Bm-lIl CLAY STUS 0022
-: CON 8 21 57- 616651 935 08/63 1312 6 FR 45 16 25 20 16/00 CO BELL TELEPIIONE CO
3278 4925741 BRWN CLAY 0012 GREY CLAY STNS 0035 GRVL
IWAN 0045 GRVL tlSND 0050 GREY CLAY 0055
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Page 25
HATER HElL DATA SYSTEM 23 OCT 86 PAGE 606 GROUND WATER BULLETIN REPORT
UHI CSG KIND WATER STAT PUBP TEST TEST OWflER/LOG/SCREEN
CONCESSION WElL EASTING HEV DIA Of fOIJIII) LVI. LVL HATE TII'IE WATER DEPTIIS IN fEET TO WIIICII WELL 00.
ETC LOT NO NORHUtIG fEET DATE DRILLER INS WATER fEET fEET fEET GP,", IIR/NN USE fOlU1ATIONS EXTEND
MUNICIPALITY CODE 57010 (CONTINUED.. .1
15598 4921700 fR 155 CLAY GRVL LynD 0034 CLAY STNS liARD 0059
CLAY 0110 CLAY GRVL 013't CSNO 0155 IS
Ollt't 03 1 CLAY SAND 0185
CON 8 27 57- 618950 725 10/78 1't52 fR 98 4 12 10 21/00 DO CANCILLA f
15700 4922600 OlCK TPSL 0001 GREY SAtlD SrtlS CNTD 0047
GREY GRVL CGRD 0062 GREY SAND GRVL CtHD
0104 OR~IN SAND STNS 0105
CON 8 27 57- 619550 750 07/79 3660 5 fR 212 15 175 5 48/00 DO CRAWfORD W
16192 4923100 SU 242 OlCK TPSL 0002 BRWN CLAY 0015 GREY CLAY
0093 BRWN SAND 0096 GnEY CLAY GRVL OlDR
0206 GI1EY fSNO CLAY 0208 YLLH U1SN fCRD
0212 GI1EY LlISN ROCK 02't2
CON 8 27 57- 619650 750 10/79 25l't 6 DO HINCII E
16712 4923200 TPSL DKCL 0001 BR~III SAND SILT OLDR 0027
rHEY SILT SAND GRVL 01't9
CON 8 27 .57- 619650 750 10/79 2514 6 fR 29 12 25 7 1/00 DO WHlCII E
16715 4923200 TPSl DKCL 0001 GREY SAND CLAY SILT 0012
GREY SilT SAND BlDR 0029 GREY GRVL SAND
SILT 0032
CON 8 27 57- 619100 750 05/81 3135 5 fR 115 18 100 3 15/00 DO fEA HIERSTONE .J
17439 4922750 PIWG 0029 GREY CLAY STNS 0115 GREY SAND
0118 IS 0115 03 1
CON 8 27 57- 619250 750 10/79 3660 5 fR 203 fLW 150 "t 3/00 DO IIEU1AKAY H
17464 4922750 ULCK TPSL 0001 GREY CLAY BLDR 0083 BLUE
CLAY GnVl LYRD 0195 BRWN fS110 0203 ORWN
NS/II) NGVl 0209 (S 0204 03 ) GREY GRVL
CIHD 0212 GREY LIISN ROCK 0212
CON 8 27 57- 619{t50 750 07/81 3660 5 fR 227 6 75 15 1/00 DO VANIN L
17542 4923250 Blum CLAY 0015 GREY CLAY GRVL BLDR 0227
GI1EY SAIID GRVL 0230 IS 0227 03 ) GIlEY
LNSN (!aCK 0230
CON 8 27 57- 619700 750 10/80 3203 6 fR 212 10 58 18 2/00 DO COWARD W
17992 4923250 ORWN SAND 0009 BRWN CLAY STNS OOl,8 BRWN
SAND CLAY STNS 0062 GREY CLAY SrtlS GRVL
0078 GREY CLAY STNS PCKD 0148 GIlEY CLAY
SilT lYRD 0208 GREY CLAY GI1VL PCKD 0210
GREY LHSN 0211 GREY CGVl 0212
CON 8 27 57- 618900 750 04/82 3203 6 fR 221 3 20 15 2/00 DO DUNN 0
18046 4922700 TPSL 0002 BRWN CLAY SAND 0006 GREY CLAY
liARD 00{t2 GIlEY CLAY SA/II) SLTY 0182 GREY
CLAY 0210 GI!EY CLAY SAIID 0221 GREY GRVL
CLAY 022{, GnEY GnVL 0226 GI!EY CLAY 0226
CON 8 27 57- 618750 750 11/81 3203 fR 1'18 10 70 10 DO GnEER E
18057 4922600 ULCK TPSl 0002 Onl'IN CLAY S/IDY 0018 GREY
CLAY STNS 0029 GnEY CLAY SIIDY 0101 GREY
CLAY SHlY 0119 GREY CLAY 0148 GREY GRVl
CLAY 0159 GUEY GUVl 0166 GREY CLAY GUVl
SHlS 01&6
CON 9 1 57- 611500 925 11/69 ".816 6 fR 170 {Il, 86 11 2"t/00 ST DO NACKAY GEO
- COUTIIIUEO -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- -
Page 26
WATER WEll DATA SYSTEM 23 OCT 86 PAGE 607 GROUND WATER OUllETIN REPORT
11TH CSG KINO WATER STAT PUNI) TEST TEST OWNER/LOG/SCREEN
CONCESSION WEll EASTING HEV DIA Of fOUND LVL LVL HATE TII'IE WAHH DEPTHS IN fEET TO WIIlCII WELL NO.
ETC lOT NO NORTIIING FEET DATE DRILLER INS WATER FEET FEET FEET GPH HR/NN USE FOlU1ATIONS EXTEND
MUNICIPALITY CODE 57010 (CONTINUED... )
6974 4937570 GHEY CLAY OOOtI 0015 GREY ClAY sms 0066
NSIIn 010'1 GREY CLAY 0115 CSND 0118 GREY
CLAY 0166 GHVL 0175 (S 0171 03 )
CON 9 2 57- 611650 925 06170 4713 6 fH 54 7 25 40 2/30 DO SIIUJ.tACIIEH 0
7621 '1936480 OnWN CLAY STNS GRVL 0046 o RIm HSND GRVl
0054 (S 0046 08 )
CON 9 4 57- 612400 1000 08176 3660 5 FR 125 33 33 10 2/00 DO YOUNG 1'1 A
15475 4935400 BnWI SAND CLAY 0018 GREY CLAY 0048 GREY
CLAY SAIID GRVL 0075 BLUE CLAY 0093 GREY
Buffalo Springs - see end of Table 1 CLAY 0115 o RI~N CLAY SAIID liARD 0122 GnEY
Test Well SAIID CLAY 0125 OHWN SAND CLAY 0129 (S
0125 04 )
CON 9 4 57- 612450 1000 11179 3660 5 43 100 40 3/00 DO YOUNG W
16522 4935350 onWN ClAY SAND 0031 GREY CLAY SINS 0070
OLUE CLAY 0133 ORWN NSND OItIO (S. 0137
03 )
CON '} 6 57- 612950 1100 06179 3135 5 85 5'1 78 4 2/30 DO HIEmlAN J
17438 4934450 IPSL 0001 OR~IN SAND PCKD 0085 BRWN SAND
LOOS 0090 (S 0066 04 )
CON 9 10 57- 614415 1050 05/66 4713 6 FR 153 60 90 15 2/00 ST DO WILSON J
3335 4932288 PRDG 0006 HSND 0070 HSND CLAY 0145 CSND
0153 (S 0145 03 )
CON 9 10 57- 615050 1070 09177 2517 6 FR 150 5 3/00 DO JEREllY LES
14741 4932650 fR 168 ORWN SAND 00'15 ORWN CLAY GRVL 0140 (S
006'1 04 ) ORWN CLAY 0147 GHEY GRVl CNTD
016'1 GHEY SAND 0168 GREY CLAY GRVL 0175
CON '} 11 57- 615140 1075 06/69 '1713 6 fR 178 100 120 10 2/00 ST DO IIOLLIS STEEVES
7181 4932580 DRWN CLAY GnVL 0026 ORWN GRVL MSND 0055
DRWN NSNO 0100 OLUE CLAY STNS 0160 onWN
NSlm 0173 DHWN CSND STNS 0178
CON 9 12 57- 616191 1015 12/64 4608 30 FH 28 28 1 ST DO 11CKAY B
3336 4931823 OlU'lN CLAY 0012 GREY CLAY 0028 HSND 0029
GHEY CLAY 0065
CON 9 12 57- 614750 1040 09/81 3135 5 55 78 12 1/30 ST DO KOZAK P
18047 4931500 TPSL 0001 SAND CLAY 0010 CLAY SNDY 0055
SAND IIArW PCKD 0090 SA 110 0098 (S 0095
03 )
CON 9 13 57- 615420 975 03/69 '1608 30 fR 12 13 SI DO STRACHAN GEORGE
6226 '1930850 OLCK fILL 0006 OHWN CLAY STNS 0012 GRVL
0015 GREY CLAY STNS 0025
CON 9 17 57- 616575 970 10174 2514 6 FR 125 12 20 25 1/30 DO LUCAS G
11665 4928575 ORWN CLAY PCKD 0002 YllW CLAY ElLDR lOOS
0004 BRim CLAY OLDR PCKD 0009 GREY CLAY
OLDH PCKD 0017 GREY CLAY GRVL STKY 0046
GREY CLAY STKY 0072 GnEY CLAY GRVL OLDR
0121 GREY CLAY GRVL IIAUO 0125 GIIEY GIIVL
SAND IIAUO 0128
CON 9 17 57- 617500 975 04/80 210'1 (. FR '118 25 60 30 15/00 IN SIIERIOAN NURSERIES
- CONTINUED -
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - -
Page 27
WATER WEll DATA SYSTEM 23 OCT 86 PAGE 615 GROUND WATER BUllETIN REPORT
U1I1 CSG KIND WATER STAT PUHP TEST TEST OWNER/lOG/SCREEN
CONCESSION WEll EASTING ElEV DIA Of fOUND lVl LVl RATE TII'IE WATER DEPTlIS IN fEET TO WIIICIt WELL NO.
ETC lOT NO NORTlIING FEET DATE DRILLER INS WATER fEET FEET fEET GPM IIR/NN USE fORMATIONS EXTEND
MUNICIPALITY CODE 57010 (CONTINUED. . . )
CLAY 0194 GREY GRVL CLAY BLDR 0201 GREY
GnVl CIHD WUnG 0201
CON 9 27 57- 619950 720 02174 1204 5 fR 190 5 170 4 3/00 DO DATES n J
10783 4923750 Bn~1N CLAY SAND BLDR 0042 BRI-IN GRVL CLAY
SAND 0050 GREY CLAY GRVl UlDR 0060 GREY
CLA Y GRVL 0190 BRUN SAND GRVl 0195 (S
0191 03 )
CON 9 27 57- 619800 725 11174 3203 5 215 16 90 8 10/00 DO BOWDEN R
12063 4923250 ulllm TPSL 0001 URWN GRVl SAND 0026 BRI'IN
nAY 0035 GREY CLAY STNS 0130 GnEY GRVl
SAND CLAY 0178 GREY CLAY 0214 UISN 0215
CON 9 27 57- 619700 745 08176 3203 5 fR 189 20 80 5 2/30 DO STEI~ARD BIll
14200 4923610 BlCK IPSl 0001 BRHN CLAY SINS 0009 GREY
CLAY SINS 0120 GnEY CLAY 0189 GRJ;:Y GRVl
SAND CLAY 0192 (S 0191 03 ) GREY GRVl
SAND 0194 CLAY 0194
CON 10 1 57- 612620 955 12/69 4713 6 fR 70 42 65 8 2/00 ST DO EGO ROBERT
7195 4938280 BflWN CLAY STNS 0027 BLUE CLAY STNS 0068
BLUE GrWl 0070
CON 10 5 57- 614730 970 11/71 3203 6 fR 24 2lt 32 6 1/00 DO SAlLA
8529 49364110 fn ll2 BRI'/N IPSL 0002 BRWN SAND GRVL 0024 BRWN
SAND GRVl 0042 (S 0039 03 )
CON 10 7 57- 614875 1045 05174 3203 6 fR 156 110 174 3 3/00 DO DUNCAN B I
11181 4935300 18lt DlCK IPSl 0002 BRWN SAND LOOS DRY 0018
mmN GRVL STIIS liARD 0065 BRWN SAND CLAY
0130 GREY CLAY 0160 BRIm GIWl CLAY 0186
(S 0183 06 ) Blum GRVl SAND WllRG 0188
CON 10 8 57- 615288 1200 07173 3203 6 fR 275 140 170 8 4/00 DO BARNETT 0
10342 4934621 PROG 0025 BRWN SAND 0062 BRWN CLAY SAND
0095 BRWN GRVl SINS DIll 0 BRI'/N SAND CLAY
0180 GREY CLAY 0186 BRWN SAND CLAY 0188
GREY CLAY 0260 GREY CLAY SILT 0275 GREY
GRVL 0277
CON 10 9 57- 615532 1155 03/56 4713 6 fR lll0 80 120 20 3/00 DO GILLESPIE K
3354 4934048 IPSL 0002 BRWN CLAY 0020 HSND 0080 QSNO
0130 BLUE CLAY 0135 GRVl NSIID 0140
CON 10 9 57- 615950 1100 11179 3135 5 fR 217 193 208 9 1/30 DO 1I0LDSWOIHIt I~
16638 4934100 BIIWN SAND GIIVL SINS 0032 BRWN SAND DRY
0130 DRWN SAND STtlS DRY 0138 BRWN SAND
DRY 0172 GREY CLAY 0217 BII~ltI SAtlD 0225
(S 0222 03 ) CLAY 0225
CON 10 10 57- 616150 1100 08179 3135 5 fR 151 133 144 8 1/30 DO FORENAtI 0
16637 4933850 SAND DRY PCKD 0101 CLAY STNS 0108 SAND
GnVl IIAlW 0151 SAtlD GnVL WORG 0155 (S
0152 03 )
CON 10 11 57- 616285 1080 10175 4715 6 fR 170 100 106 7 1/00 DO TENPLETOtl ROBERT
12660 4933215 BRI~ IPSl 0003 BRWN SAND 0044 GREY GRVl
SAtlD 0068 GREY CLAY 0080 BRIm SAND 0172
- CONTINUED -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Page 28
WATER WELL DATA SYSTEli 23 OCT 66 PAGE 621 GROUND WATER DULLETIN REPORT
UTH CSG KIND ~IATER STAT PUI,IP TEST TEST OWNER/LOG/SCREEN
CONCESSION WELL EASTlNG ELEV DIA OF fOUND LVl LVl RATE TII'IE WATER DEPTIIS IN fEET TO WIIICII WELL NO .
ETC lOT NO NORTHING fEET DATE DRIllER INS WATER fEET fEET fEET GPH IIR/NN USE FORHATlONS EXTEND
MUNICIPALITY CODE 57010 (CONTINUED... )
l'I391 4925500 SAND GIIVL CHTD 0102 CLAY SILT 0126 CLAY
GRVl 0175 UISN FCIID 0166 ClAY 01 ')2 UISN
0216
CON 10 25 57- 621300 725 12/77 3135 5 fR 116 flW DO BRISTOW JOliN
14993 4925700 TPSl 0001 BliNN CLAY STNS 0011 GREY CLAY
STNS GIIVL 0055 GREY CLAY 0105 GREY CLAY
:;ILT lYRD 0111 GIIEY CLAY GRVl liARD 0116
GREY GRVl 0116
COl4 10 25 57- 621050 725 12/77 3135 5 fR 123 7 100 4 3/00 DO IIOSICK RAlPII
15000 4925400 TPSl 0001 BRWN CLAY STNS 0013 GREY CLAY
GIWl liARD 0063 GREY CLAY 0102 GREY CLAY
SILT lYRD 0123 SAND 0126 (S 0123 03 )
CON 10 25 57- 620650 750 10/78 3135 5 fR 170 }llll 5 48/00 DO IIECKROTlI W
15908 4925300 TI'Sl 0001 BRNN CLAY STNS .0010 GREY CLAY
GRVL liARD 0120 GREY CLAY BlDR GIIVL 0135
GREY GIIVL CLAY 0170 GREY GRVL W8RG 0170
CON 10 25 57- 621050 750 06/79 3135 5 fR 100 19 30 10 1/00 DO NUlU1ING N
16632 4925700 PIWG 0053 GREY CLAY SOFT 0101 GREY SAND
W8RG 0104 (S 0101 03 )
CON 10 25 57- 620750 750 04/80 1467 5 FR 136 flW 3 4/00 DO COLEHAN J
16710 4925200 BLCK TPSl 0002 GREY CLAY STNS GRVl 0029
GREY ClAY GRVl lYRD 0131 GREY CGVL 0136
BRIm SAND 0139 (S 0136 03 )
CON 10 25 57- 620950 750 10/79 2514 6 FR 112 14 109 10 1/30 DO SCIIIELE R
16716 4925400 PRDG 0022 GREY SILT SAUD BLDR 0080 GREY
CLAY SOFT 0108 GREY FSND CLAY 0115 (S
0112 03 )
CON 10 25 57- 621400 725 05/81 2514 6 FR 114 7 98 20 1/00 DO VOGEUlANN H
17680 4925650 13 RI'/N CI. A Y SAND BlDR 0012 GREY CLAY SILT
SAND 0035 GREY SAND SILT 0058 GREY CLAY
SOfT 0114 GREY tlSND 0116 (S 0115 03 )
CON 10 26 57- 620600 735 04/77 2104 6 FR 134 110 20 4/30 DO WESTON TED
14112 4925150 BLCK TPSl STIIS lOOS 0003 BLUE CLAY STNS
nUSE 0132 DR~IN GIIVL SAlin LOOS 0134
CON 11 1 57- 613433 960 03/66 4606 30 fR 20 16 2 PS CONNUNITY IIALl
3370 4938779 tlSND 0010 GREY ClAY 0020
CON 11 3 57- 614320 975 12171 4608 30 FR 25 25 30 2 1/00 DO BIEZER J E
8536 4937380 BRWN CLAY STNS 0025 GRVl 0032
- CON 11 4 57- 615350 875 09/82 4816 11 flW 10 2/00 ST no JOIIIISTON A
18203 4937550 SAlin GHVl CLAY 0003 BRWN CLAY 0018 GREY
CLAY 0063 CSND 0095 (5 0067 05 )
CON 11 5 57- 615050 950 07/76 3663 6 FR 35 15 23 6 2/30 00 TUDIIOPE STEPIIEN
13565 4936200 BI!~IN TPSl lOOS 0003 BRWN SAND DNSE 0023
BRNN GRVL SAND LOOS 0035 (S 0029 03 )
CON 11 7 57- 616040 1000 05/77 3660 5 FR 152 127 5 2/00 00 GIIANT JHI
14282 4935950 BRWN TPSl 0006 RED SAND 0028 GREY SAND
GIIVL DRY 0090 BliNN SANO CLAY 0095 BRNN
SAIID CLAY 0105 BRIm SAND G/!VL 0152 DR~IN
G/!VL CHTD 0161 (S 0158 03 )
.. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Page 29
WATER WELL DATA SYSTEIi 23 OCT 86 PAGE 622 GROUND WATER BULLETIN REPORT
UTN CSG KIND WATER STAT PUN I' TEST TEST OWNER/LOG/SCREEN WELL NO.
CONCESSION WELL EASTING ELEV DIA Of fOUUD LVL LVI. RATE TIt'IE WATER DEPTIIS IN fEET TO WIIlCII
ETC LOT NO NORTlIING fEET DATE DRILLER INS WATER fEET fEET fEET GPIi IIR/NN USE fORMATIONS EXTEND
MUNICIPALITY CODE 57010 (CONTINUED... I
CON 11 'J 57- 616110 1185 01/66 5206 4 fR 230 230 235 " 10/00 ST DO GOODfELLOW II
3371 4934463 BRIm NSlm 0006 BRWN MSND GRVL 0248
CON 11 'J 57- 616250 1150 11/79 2653 6 100 100 10 DO HENMING B
17924 493',300 SAND CLAY 0095 GRVL SAND 0160 CLAY 0240
GnVL 0269
CON 11 11 57- 617175 1050 08/13 4713 6 fR 101 80 80 20 2/30 DO IIANZLIK RICIIARD
10258 4933650 BRWN SAND CLAY LYRD 0060 BRWN GRVL STNS
DNSE 0100 BnWN GRVL LOOS 0101
CON 11 11 57- 617500 1005 06/13 4713 6 fR 85 60 80 4 2/30 DO CnESSWELL IIAllnY
10259 4'B4075 BR~~ SAND CLAY LYRD 0080 (S 0077 08 )
BI{WN SAND LOOS 0085
CON 11 11 57- 611320 1050 07/74 4713 6 FR 92 75 75 25 2/30 DO ROACII B
11483 4933957 BRIm fSND CLAY BLDR 0035 BRWN GRVL 0091
Blum GRVL 0092
CON 11 11 57- 617150 1075 05/77 2104 6 FR 157 112 150 8 8/30 DO WAGG WILLIAN
14255 4933600 Bn~IN SAND DNSE 0150 (S 0l't3 04 ) BRWN
SANO LOOS 0157
CON 11 11 57- 616800 1025 11/75 1312 6 fR 10', 96 100 6 2/00 DO AOBOTT 14
16988 4933600 BRWN III' AN Slmy 0050 BRWN SAND GRVl 0104
CON 11 12 57- 618171 1010 07/60 4713 6 fR 406 US 240 10 6/00 ST DO IIOIIN A
3372 4933486 TPSl 0002 CLAY STNS 0080 HSND GRVl CLAY
0160 BLUE CLAY STNS 0390 GRVL MSND 0406
(S 0399 07 I
CON 11 12 57- 617231 1035 07/66 4713 6 fR 76 40 70 10 2/00 ST DO IIARN II
3313 4932790 TPSl 0002 CLAY STNS 0035 fSND CLAY 0073
CSND 0081 (S 0074 04 )
CON 11 13 57- 618526 935 04/60 '1713 6 fR 380 101 248 10 6/00 ST DO IIORN E
3374 4932868 TPSl 0002 CLAY STNS 0050 IiSND 0240 BLUE
CLAY 0378 GIIVl 0380
CON 11 13 57- 617500 1000 07/79 2104 6 fR 61 12 30 20 5/00 ST IIORNE E
16124 4932200 BLCK TPSL LOOS 0002 BRWN SAND DNSE 0058
BRWN SAND GRVl LaOS 0061 BRWN SAND GRYl
CLAY 0061
CON 11 15 57- 618800 940 06/69 4713 6 fR ',7 10 ',0 5 2/30 DO ONASCIIUCII W
7011 4931360 BnWN CLAY NSND STNS 0040 (S 0039 08 )
OUWN liSND GRYl STNS 0047
CON 11 15 57- 619100 981 11/78 4241 6 fU 46 27 39 8 2/30 DO NOULD W
15627 4931800 BRWN CLAY TILL 0010 BRWN SAND CRVl CLAY
- 0041 BRWN fSND tlSND 00',3 BRWN fSND CSND
r.UYl 00',6 BUI'IN NSND GUYl 0049 (S 0046
03 )
CON 11 15 57- 619100 981 11/78 4241 6 fR '11 25 35 10 2/00 DO BUTLER A
15631 4931600 PUDG 0026 BRWN SAND CRYl CLAY 0039 BRWN
fSND liSND GRVL 0040 BUWN liSUD GRVl CLAY
00',1 BUWN liSI/D CSND fGYL 0044 (S 0041
03 )
-: CON 11 16 57- 619501 931 03/58 '1713 fR ',6 30 38 10 2/00 DO IIARDING R
3375 4931660 PROG 0030 BLUE CLAY 0044 CRYl 0046
CON 11 16 57- 619564 930 10/6', '1816 6 fR 80 30 60 2 2/00 EAST OIW SCIIOOL
- CONTINUED -
- - - - - - - - - - - .. -
... - - - - - ,
Page 30 I
,
!
WATER WELL DATA SYSTEM 23 OCT 86 PAGE 631 GROUND WATER DUlLETIN REPORT
UTH C5G KIND WATER STAT PlJlW TEST TEST OWNER/lOG/SCREEN ,
CONCESSION WELL EASTHlG HEV DIA OF fOUND LVL lVl RATE TII.IE WATER DEPTHS IN fEET TO WIIICH WELL NO.
ETC LOT NO NORTlIING FEET DATE DRIllER INS WATER fEET fEET FEET GPM /lR/NN USE fOW1ATIONS EXTEND
MUNICIPALIry CODE 57010 (CONTINUED... )
13470 4926340 FIll 0003 BRWN CLAY STNS 0013 GREY CLAY
GnVI. STNS 0072 GREY CLAY 0097 SAND GRVl
0100 GRVl 0100
CON 11 25 57- 621450 720 11/77 3660 5 FR 55 2 9 30 1/00 DO MCCUE I'
14790 4925900 UlCK TPSl 0002 DRWN CLAY 0010 BLUE CLAY
GnVL 0018 BLUE CLAY 0055 BRWN SAND GRVL
CLAY 0059
CON 11 25 57- 621500 725 11/77 3203 FR 114 20 72 6 1/30 DO SWACKHAMER FRED
15120 4926050 BI.CK TPSl 0002 BRWN CLAY 0018 BRWN CLAY
SAND 0056 BLUE CLAY 0101 GREY CLAY SAND
LYRO 0114 GREY SAND 0126 (S 0123 03 )
CON 11 25 57- 621350 750 10/79 3660 5 fR 183 13 75 10 2/00 00 CESCON A
16416 4926450 BLCK TPSl 0001 GREY CLAY 0019 YLlW MSND
0020 GREY GRVl CMTD 0024 BLUE CLAY STKY
0065 GREY CLAY STNS 0091 GIIEY CLAY SAND
GRVL 0125 BLUE CLAY 0165 GREY SAND GRVL
CI11D 0175 GREY LNSN ROCK 0183
CON 11 25 57- 6USOO 750 05/80 3135 5 fR 98 5 20 10 3/00 DO !lOFF B
17432 4926700 PRDG 0037 GREY CLAY 0092 SAND CLAY 0098
GIIVI. 0098
CON 11 25 57- 622000 850 10/81 3135 5 FR 86 7 20 7 2/30 DO MEIICURI. l: MCItUGII E
18053 4926800 BLCK TPSl 0001 DaWN CLAY STNS 0015 GREY
CLAY SAND GRVl 0086 GREY SAND GRVL 0086
CON 11 26 57- 621850 750 05/80 3135 5 FR 100 14 26 6 1/30 DO 11ACARTlIUR M
17431 4926700 PRDG 0015 GREY CLAY GRVL 0094 SAND GRVL
CLAY 0100 GRVL 0100
CON 12 1 57- 615575 935 07/75 3660 5 FR 202 76 120 7 2/00 DO WATSON FRANK
12322 49l,0525 BI.CK TPSL 0001 BRWU CLAY SAND 0060 GREY
CLAY 0202 GREY tlSNO GRVL 0205 (S 0202
03 )
CON 12 7 57- 617635 1010 11/57 4713 6 FR 275 127 135 20 4/00 ST DO JOI/NSTON B
3405 4936754 TPSI. 0002 BRWN CLAY 0018 GRVL NSND 0070
liSND 0127 BLUE CLAY 0271 GIWL 0275
CON 12 7 57- 616700 1000 04/68 2514 t. FR 62 40 53 12 1/00 DO JOI/IISON A
5908 4936490 TPSI. 0001 SAND GRVL fil.DR 0040 YLLW NSND
CSIII) 0065 (S 0062 03 )
CON 12 8 57- 618161 1050 01/58 4713 6 FR 376 197 230 15 3/00 ST DO RUTI/UFORD R
3406 493612& TPSL 0002 GRVI. BLDR 0096 MSND CLAY 0197
- QSND 0370 GRVL tlSND 0375 (S 0371 05 )
GRVL HSND QSND 0376
CON 12 10 57- 618581 985 08/46 2116 FR 202 90 120 6 4/00 DO ST PAYNE A
3407 4935606 PROG 0030 MSND 0070 QSND 0120 SILT 0198
GIIVI. 0202
CON 12 10 57- 618178 1025 02/56 4713 6 FR 137 127 130 12 2/00 ST DO ANOERSON C
3406 4934670 TI'SI. 0002 CLAY STNS 0046 GRVL 0070 CLAY
STNS 0130 GRVL 0137
-: CON 12 10 57- 617902 985 01/67 4713 6 FR 10l, 95 95 4 2/00 DO ANDERSON C
3409 4934410 TPSI. 0002 CLAY MSUD 0040 FSND 0050 GRVL
CLAY 0100 GRVI. 0104
- - - - - - - - - - - -
~J - - - - - -
Page 31
WATER WEll DATA SYSTEM 23 OCT 86 PAGE 632 GROUND WATER BUllETIN REPORT
UTI1 CSG KIND WATER STAT PUNP TEST TEST OWNER/lOG/SCREEN
CONCESSION WEll EASTING HEV DlA OF fOUND lVl lVl RATE TII'IE WATER DEPTHS IN FEET TO WIIlCII WELL NO.
ETC lOT NO NORT/HNG FEET DATE DRIllER INS WATER fEET fEET fEET GPM IIR/MN USE fORNATIONS EXTEND
MUNICIPALITY CODE 57010 (CONTINUED... )
CON 12 10 57- 617930 990 04/68 4713 6 fR 132 98 120 15 2/00 DO SCOTT E
5907 49341150 TPSl 0002 CLAY GRVl OOllO HSND 0070 CLAY
~tSND 0126 CSNU 0132 (S 0128 04 )
CON 12 10 57- 617800 980 05/69 4713 6 fR 157 117 157 20 3/00 DO SCOTT l
7003 4934420 fSND 0060 GRVl CMTD 0129 BLUE CLAY 0140
CLAY SAtlD 0143 BLUE CLAY 0153 (S 0149
08 ) fSND CSND 0157
CON 12 10 57- 618828 925 02173 3203 5 fR 44 25 30 10 2/30 DO Tm~NSIIlI) OF ORO
9727 4935031 BRWtI fSND 0016 BRWN SAND GRVL OOl.4 BR~IN
GRVl CSND 0047 (S 00ft4 03 )
CON 12 10 57- 617892 1000 07174 4713 6 FR 128 100 100 25 2/30 DO SCOTT CONST
11480 4934452 BRNN SAND 0035 BRWN GRVl STNS 0124 (S
0120 08 ) BR~ltI SAtlD 0128
CON 12 10 57- 617810 1010 08176 2104 6 FR 165 1110 150 20 29/00 DO SCOTT SILO CONSTR
13574 4934510 BRWN SAND lOOS 0060 BRWN CLAY GRVl DNSf
0100 BR~1fI GRVL mISE 0160 BRWU SAND GRVl
LYRD 0165
CON 12 10 57- 617650 1035 11176 2104 6 fR 200 168 195 8 3/30 DO DEPlANCKE ROGER
13868 4934590 BRWtl SAND STNS DNSE 0196 (S 0190 04 )
BRIm SAND lOOS 0200
COli 12 10 57- 617900 1020 05178 2104 6 fR 245 215 230 10 12/00 DO SCOTT SI lO CONSTR
15200 4934900 BRWN MSND DNSE 0070 BRml CLAY GRVl PCKD
0170 BRWN HSND GRVl PCKD 0200 BLUE CLAY
STNS DNSE 02ftO BRWN SAND GRVl lOOS 0245
CON 12 10 57- 617700 1050 06/78 210ft 6 fR 153 133 133 16 4/00 00 SCOTT SILO CONST
15311 493ft800 ORWN SAND DNSE 0058 BRWN GRVl STNS ONSE
OIlt7 BRWN GIWL lOOS 0153
CON 12 10 57- 617750 1025 07179 2104 6 fR 203 160 165 30 3/00 DO CARTMIll B
16121 49311700 BRWN SAND STNS ONSE 00110 ORWN GRVl CLAY
STNS 0160 BLUE CLAY STNS DNSE 0199 (S
0193 Oft ) BRWN SAND LOOS 0203 BRWN SAND
DNSE 0203
CON 12 10 57- 617650 1050 04/81 1467 5 fR 208 188 190 5 1/30 DO VANDERBURG 0
17600 4934800 BI~WN SAND 0054 GREY GRVL 0062 BRWN SAND
0103 GREY CGVL CIHD 0138 GREY CLAY 0178
GREY GR'lL ClnD 0206 ORHN HSND 0213 (S
0210 03 I GREY GR'lL CI1TO 0213
COlt 12 11 57- 619037 900 11/63 4816 6 fR 20 13 60 5 5/00 00 lANGMAN T
3410 49348li4 Fit 80 RED HSND 0068 BLUE CLAY STNS 0077 MSND
GflVl0085 (S 0080 02 I
CON 12 11 57- 618900 975 09/70 4608 30 fR 25 13 21 5 1/15 DO CRAWfORD CIIAS
7579 4934950 fR 28 OlCK TPSL 0001 GREY HSND 0020 DRWN CLAY
SINS 0026
CON 12 11 57- 619087 796 06/72 4713 6 fR 65 14 60 15 2/00 DO CRAWfORD Ii
9686 4934981 ORWN CLAY STNS 0027 BLUE ClAY SAND 0040
BRrlN fSND CLAY 0060 DRWN CSNO 0085 (S
- 0061 Oft )
..
CON 12 15 57- 620516 955 10/66 4608 30 fR 6 6 2 ST 00 HoonE II
3ft11 4932395 GREY CLAY STNS 0018
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
Page 32
WATER WELL DATA SYSTEM 23 OCT 86 PAGE 637 GROUND WATER BULLETIN REPORT
UTM CSG KIND WATER STAT pmlp TEST TEST OWNER/LOG/SCREEN WELL NO.
CONCESSION WElL EASTING ElEV DIA Of fOUND LVL LVL RATE TII'IE WATER DEPTHS IN fEET TO WIIICII
ETC LOT NO NORTHING fEET DATE DRIllER INS WATER fEET fEET fEET Gp~1 IIR/MN USE fORMATIONS EXTEND
MUNICIPALITY CODE 57010 (CONTINUED. . . )
3435 9999999 pRDG 0033 CLAY MSND STNS 0105 QSND 0155
SILT 0175 CLAY MStm STNS 0208 GRVL 0212
CON 13 1 57- 617050 850 011176 't't07 6 80 HW 10 12/00 no 11110 WN A
12969 4940550 GIIEY GIIVL STNS BLDR 0035 GREY CLAY 0076
HIIWN fGVL 0080
CON 13 1 57- 617100 850 12177 4512 6 fR 80 HW 3 30 1/00 DO HOYDELL B
15408 4940200 BII~IU CLAY SNny 0006 GREY CLAY SNDY 0080
SANI) GIIVL 0080
CON 13 1 57- 617050 850 10178 4512 6 fR 76 8 11 20 1/30 no CLARK n
16003 4940350 GREY II I' AN STNY 0025 GREY CLAY SNDY 0070
OIlWN CLAY 0076
CON 13 2 57- 616200 900 06178 3815 30 fR 20 22 24 /15 no f)O~ISELL W
15330 4939800 BRWN TpSL BLnR LOOS OOO't GREY fSND LOOS
0020 GREY QSNI) DNSE 0028
CON 13 2 57- 617050 850 05178 4512 6 fR 69 fLW 120 DO llANOS 0
15985 4940300 GIIEY CLAY STNY 0069 SAND GRVL 0070
CON 13 2 57- 617100 850 11/81 1312 6 fR 79 flW 70 5 24/00 DO nllEW K
18088 4940150 TpSL fILL 0002 BRWN CLAY STNS SNDY 0049
CLAY BLDR 0079 BIIWN SAND 0082 (S 0079
03 )
CON 13 8 57- 618236 985 02/64 1312 6 fR 230 123 135 15 2/00 ST DO MCLEOD K
3424 4936392 GRVL tiS NO 0027 MSND 0042 ClAY MSND 0130
CLAY 0145 HSND CLAY IIpAN 0230 CSND GRVL
0237 (S 0233 04 ) GRN CLAY IIpAN 0245
CON 13 12 57- 620780 925 12/69 4608 30 44 10 52 4 1/30 DO DAVIS 0 A
6889 4934900 54 GIIEY GRVL STNS 0054
CON 13 15 57- 621646 900 11/62 4713 6 fR 226 B 120 10 2/00 ST no nIIINKl.E E
3425 4933132 PRDG 0043 BLUE CLAY tiSND 0160 MSND 0178
BLUE CLAY 0222 (S 0216 10 ) GRVL 0226
CON 13 16 57- 621389 910 11/64 4816 6 fR 200 80 170 18 2/00 ST DO JERliY G
3426 4932454 BRWN TPSL CLAY 0006 MSND GRVL 0024 BLUE
CLAY GRVL 0095 BLUE CLAY 0124 BLUE CLAY
SILT fSND 0195 liSND GRVL 0210 (S 0200
03 )
CON 13 17 57- 621320 900 06/59 2514 6 fn 87 57 78 8 3/00 DO IIORNE E .
3427 49316B TpSL 0001 BRWN CLAY 0008 BLUE CLAY BLDR
0016 BLUE CLAY 0072 HSND 0087 (S 0084
03 )
- CON 13 17 57- 622380 875 10/68 4608 30 fR 38 35 DO PERRYMAN A
5792 4932240 TpSL OU01 BRWN CLAY STNS 0037 GRVL MSND
STNS 0046
CON 13 17 57- 621130 905 12175 2514 6 fR 92 67 85 20 2/00 DO IIORNE PAUL
13150 4931950 BRWN CLAY OLDR 0019 GREY CLAY SOFT 0067
GREY CLAY SAND OLDR 0079 GREY SAND SILT
BlDR 0092 (S 0091 03 ) BRW4 CSNO CGVL
SILT 009't
-: CON 13 18 57- 621714 905 11/53 5510 4 fR 146 78 80 5 1/30 ST DO SIIELSWElL R
3428 4931099 CLAY tiSND BlDR 0015 IIpAN GRVL 0046 UNKN
- CONTINUED -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-
Page 33
WATER WELL DATA SYSTEM 23 OCT 86 PAGE 6lt2 GROUND WATER BUllETIN REPORT
UTM CSG YIND WATER STAT PL~IP TEST TEST OWNER/LOG/SCREEN WELL NO.
CONCESSION WELL EASTING HEV DIt. OF FOUND LVL LVL RATE TIME WATER DEPTIIS IN FEET TO WIIICH
ETC lOT NO NORTllIUG FEET DATE DRILLER I~:~ WATER FEET FEET FEET GPH IIR/MN USE fORMATIONS EXTEND
MUNICIPALITY CODE 57010 (CONTINUED... )
18051 4928550 TPSL 0001 CLAY STNS 0016 CLAY GRVL STNS
0138 GflVL SAND CLAY 0152
CON 13 23 57- 623450 775 12/81 3135 5 ffl 165 20 65 6 36/00 00 WILSON M
18052 4928950 TPSL 0001 CLAY STNS BLDR 0165 SAND GRVl
0170
CON 13 23 57- 623350 750 08/81 3135 5 FR 185 150 2 3/00 DO BLAKE
18056 4928650 TPSL 0001 BRWN CLAY STNS 0016 GREY CLAY
SAND LYflD 0158 Ll1SN 0185
CON 14 1 57- 618055 860 08/67 4608 30 FR 12 12 2 DO MCKINtlOtl f
3436 4941380 TPSl 0001 BRWN STNS CLAY 0020 GREY CLAY
STNS 0037
CON 14 1 57- 617300 845 10/69 1312 6 fR 90 3 85 6 DO LOCK GEORGE
7058 4940850 BLCK "IUCK 0010 GREY CLAY SItIS 0070 BlCK
HSND 0075 GnEY CLAY STNS 0090 (S 0089
04 ) BRWN GRVL ~ISND 0093
CON 14 1 57- 618100 850 02/71 2514 6 SU 184 26 110 10 4/00 DO NEYER P II
7928 4941040 PRDG 0031 GREY CLAY GRVl BLDR 0056 GREY
CLAY GRVL BLDR 0084 GREY CLAY 0130 GREY
SILT GRVl CLAY 0181 BRWN LHSN 0184
CON 14 1 57- 617285 840 02/74 1312 6 FR 80 2 60 6 2/00 DO JOLSTON GEORGE
11770 4940875 8lt BRWN MUCK 0008 GREY CLAY 0080 DRWN SAND
0084 (S 0080 04 )
CON 14 1 57- 617625 845 12/74 4408 6 FR 75 10 60 15 2/00 DO KEATS
12131 4940935 TPSL CLAY DKCl 0070 GRVl 0076
CON 14 1 57- 617150 845 10/75 2652 6 FR 83 32 80 5 1/00 DO STAIUTON RONALD
12604 4940525 BlCK OODN 0006 ORWN IIPAN 0028 GREY ClAY
GRVl 0077 BRWN SAND CLN 0089 (S 0082
07 )
CON 14 1 57- 617090 850 06/76 2652 6 fn 75 22 69 8 1/30 no CLARK ALEX
13211 4940750 BlCK OBDN 0008 BRWN III' AN 0030 GREY CLAY
fSND 0072 BRWN CSND ClN 0083 (S 0077
05 )
CON 14 1 57- 617090 850 05/77 2653 6 FR 20 ltO 6 1/00 DO TnOTTER M
14296 4940750 IIPAN GRVl 0044 IIPAN CLAY 0204 LMSN 0214
CON 14 1 57- 574100 625 10/78 3602 4 FR 100 llO 80 26 1/30 no nUTTE M
15646 4924050 PIWG 0008 ORWN SAND 0030 GREY CLAY STKY
0100 ORWI. SAND WORG 0104 (S 0101 03 )
CON 14 2 57- 618184 840 06/65 1312 6 FR 85 7 60 20 6/00 DO GOODFEllOW U
3437 4940783 BRWN CLAY liP AN 0020 GREY CLAY III' AN 0070
BlDn 0075 GREY CLAY IIPAN 0085 HSND GRVl
0087
CON 14 2 57- 618294 840 09/60 2803 6 fR 95 30 95 2 3/00 DO KEIIOE ~I
3438 4940667 IHI~IN TPSL 0003 BLUE CLAY STNS 0090 GRVl
0095
CON 14 2 57- 618385 875 10/64 1312 6 FR 98 31 80 10 1/00 no SERVICE H
3439 4941068 BRWN CLAY STNS 0010 GREY CLAY liP AN BlDR
- 0065 GRVL 0066 GREY /lPAN OLDR 0098 (S
.
0095 05 ) GRVI. NSND 0100 GREY /lPAN 0103
CON 14 2 57- 618350 875 10/64 1312 6 FR 87 27 75 10 1/00 no /lARVEY J
- COf/TINUED -
. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Page 34
WATER WEll DATA SYSTEM 23 OCT 66 PAGE 6113 GROUND WATER BUllETIN REPORT
UTH CSG KIND WATER STAT PUHP TEST TEST OWNER/LOG/SCREEN
CONCESSION WELL EASTING ELEV DIA OF FOUND LVL lVL RATE TIHE WATER DEPTIIS IN FEET TO WHICH WELL NO.
ETC lOT NO NORTIIING FEET DATE DRIllER INS WATER FEET FEET FEET GPH IIR/I1N USE FOIUIATIONS EXTEND
MUNICIPALITY CODE 57010 (CONTINUED. . . )
3440 4941129 PRDG 0027 GREY IIPAN BLDR 0063 GRVl 0064
GREY IIPAN BlDR 0067 (S 0065 05 ) GRVl
USND 0090
CON 14 2 57- 616365 865 09/65 1312 FR 91 25 50 25 lIt/OO DO WII ITE T
3441 4940668 FR 152 PIWG 0036 GREY liP AN 00lt5 BR~IN ~ISND 0046
GnEY IIPAN BLDR 0056 GnEY liP AN BlDR 0090
GRVL CLAY 0091 BLUE IIPAN BlDR 0125 GREY
ClAY 0151 BLCK FSND 0153
CON 1ft 2 57- 618269 840 08/66 1312 6 FR 76 25 60 7 2/30 DO WEBB F
3442 4940722 STNS CLAY 0073 (S 0072 04 ) HStlD 0076
CLAY 0078
CON llt 2 57- 618270 840 03/69 4608 30 FR 10 11 DO DAVE R
6150 4940750 BRWN ClAY STNS 0010 GREY CLAY SINS 0021
CON 1ft 2 57- 618250 835 12169 4608 30 FR 18 12 20 2 1/00 DO HEYER R II
6669 4940750 Fit 30 OltWU CLAY 0015 GREY CLAY 0030
CON 14 2 57- 616400 850 09/70 4608 30 Fit 26 9 5 1115 DO SEMIS ROBT
7478 4940930 Fit 37 GnEY CLAY STNS 0037
CON 14 2 57- 618350 865 11/73 1312 6 Fit 160 40 150 6 10/00 DO HUlmOCK GARY
10670 4940900 GRVL FIll 0003 BRWN IIPAN 0040 GREY BPAN
BLDR 0100 GREY CLAY 0160 (S 0158 04 )
OnWN SAND 0163
CON 1ft 2 57- 618200 850 01/74 2514 6 FR 177 21 187 6 1/30 DO DEVLIN B
10839 4940925 TPSl LOOS DKCl 0001 BRWN CLAY PCKD 0045
GREY FSND lYRD 0051 GREY CLAY PCKD 0087
GnEY I!PAN BAnD 0117 GREY CLAY STKY 0169
GnEY CLAY SIILE liARD 0177 GREY LNSN liARD
0197
CON 14 2 57- 618350 860 10/74 4407 i FR 188 15 50 5 1130 DO SHITII A
12113 4940825 liREY CLAY BLDR SAND 0179 GREY LHSN 0189
CON 14 2 57- 618650 850 08/75 4241 6 FR 82 15 4 2115 DO DEHPSEY KENT
12444 4940700 BRWN CSND STNS 0030 BRWN FSND 0062 GREY
CLAY 0082 GREY SAND GIIVL 0086 (S 0082
04 I
CON 14 2 57- 618350 845 01/76 4241 6 fR 59 6 12 4/00 DO BAXTER .J II
12723 4940670 BlU'lt1 SANO GRVL BLDR 0015 GREY SAND CLAY
GRVL 0043 GREY SAND GRVl 0060
CON 14 2 57- 618400 845 05/75 2517 6 FR 129 25 80 10 2/00 DO WILSON B
12945 4940600 IIRWN TPSL 0002 GREY CLAY BLDR 0065 GIIEY
CLAY FSND 0115 BRWN GRVl SAND CLAY 0127
BRUN GRVL 0129
CON 14 Z 57- 618150 850 06/76 4512 6 SU 218 50 180 30 2/00 DO ~IARTIN BIll
13280 4940860 BRWN SAND FILL 0002 BLCK PEAT 0006 BRWN
liP AN 0018 GREY IIPAN BlDR 0100 GREY CLAY
0160 GREY IIPAN BlDR 0190 GREY LHSN 0216
GREY UISN FCRD 0218
CON 14 2 57- 618400 850 01180 2653 FR 232 100 100 10 24/00 DO IIANILTOII T
17339 4940950 III'AN BLDR 0100 "PAN CLAY 0204 LHSN 0234
CON 14 2 57- 618350 850 07/81 4245 6 FR 40 5 19 15 2/00 DO CASTLE~IA!~ .J
- CONTINUED -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ - -
/
Page 35
WATER WElL DATA SYSTEM B OCT 86 PAGE 6','\ GIWUND WATER BULLETIN REPORT
UTl1 CSG KIND WATER STAT PUMP TEST TEST OWNER/LOG/SCREEN
CONCESSION WELL EASTING ElEV DIA Of fOUND lVL lVl. RATE TII-IE WATER DEPTl/S IN fEET TO W/lICH WELL NO.
ETC lOT NO NORT/lING fEET DATE DRIllER INS WATER FEET fEET FEET GPM /lR/MN USE FOIU1ATIONS EXTEND
MUNICIPALITY CODE 57010 (CONTINUED... )
17535 4940800 ORWN SAND GRVL 0016 BRWN fSNO 0023 GREY
SAND GHVL 0034 GREY CLAY 00',0 GI!EY GIWL
0040
CON 14 5 57- 619411 875 06/65 1312 6 FR 95 30 50 10 2/00 DO MOI!ELAND W
3443 4938849 GRVL /lPAN 0030 GREY HPAN 0050 GREY CLAY
0060 QSIID 0065 GREY /lPAII 0075 GREY CLAY
0095 IS 0089 04 ) ORWN 11SND 0097
CON 14 5 57- 619100 875 11/81 2653 6 FR 29 fLW 29 20 DO OUTLER B
17926 4939100 CLAY sAlm /lPAN 0028 GRVL 0029
CON 14 8 57- 620500 950 09/81 3742 36 52 ',0 60 4 4/00 DO WOOLLEY 0
17692 4937850 FSIIO 00',0 CSNO 0065
CON 14 10 57- 620800 925 03/70 4713 6 FR 211 105 120 20 2/00 ST DO ANDERSON J
7630 4936200 BR~IU CLAY STllS 0080 ORWN OLDR 0086 OLUE
CLAY SINS 0207 IS 0203 08 ) BRWN GRVL
I-ISIIO 0211
CON 14 11 57- 620741 930 03/65 4608 30 fR 20 16 2 DO EDGETT W
3444 4936028 TPSL 0001 ORWN CLAY 0015 GREY CLAY 0020
FSND 0030
CON 14 12 57- 620750 825 09/70 4608 30 FR 10 10 18 5 1/00 DO UAUDSlEY JACK
7484 4935250 Fn 20 ORWN CLAY SINS 0010 GREY CLAY STNS 0020
CON 14 13 57- 621400 850 12/77 2653 6 fR 81 30 60 3 DO I-IYERS COUGII T
14916 4934500 liP AN OlOR SAND 0083
CON 14 14 57- 621603 875 08/63 3711 30 fn 20 20 32 5 24/00 ST MAUDSlEY J
3445 4933734 CSIID 0036
CON 14 14 57- 621603 875 02/66 4713 6 FR 69 38 67 2 2/00 DO ~IAUOSlEY J
3446 4933739 PROG 0038 CLAY BlDR 0069 IS 0064 07 )
GRVl HSNO CLAY 0071
CON 14 16 57- 622977 800 11/62 2514 6 fR 25 6 27 18 2/00 DO U/lO
3447 4933648 HSNO GRVl STNS 0013 CSNO 0022 CSND GRVL
0028 IS 0025 03 )
CON 14 16 57- 622913 925 08/63 251'\ 6 FR 50 8 49 16 4/00 DO 0110
3448 4933586 PRDR 0031 BLUE ClAY 00',9 CSND GRVl 0050
CON 14 16 57- 623220 790 04/70 4713 6 FR 112 1 30 20 2/30 DO REAUMAN P
7629 4933770 ORIIN GRVL MSND 0004 ORWN CLAY OLDR 0022
OlUE CLAY MSND 0070 ORWN GRVL 0089 ORWN
MSNO 0112 IS 010', 08 )
CON 14 16 57- 623250 790 12/70 4713 6 114 fLW 60 20 2/00 DO S/lELLSWEll H
7805 4933700 OR~IN CLAY SINS 0028 OLUE CLAY SINS 0070
ORWN ClAY USNU 0110 ORWN CSND 0114 IS
0110 04. )
CON 14 16 57- 622750 830 09/82 3602 6 fR 68 20 42 35 4/00 DO IHC PATROL YARD
18205 4933500 ORWN SAND GRVL 0007 ORWN SAND CLN WBRG
0033 ORWN GIWl DRIY 0045 GREY ClAY GRVl
liARD 00(,8 GREY CLAY /lARD 0060 GREY CLAY
SAND 0065 YLlW SAND 0068 OnWN SAND CLN
wonG 0077 IS 0070 07 )
-: CON 14 18 57- 622585 870 10/63 1312 6 Fn 33 12 32 10 2/00 DO MAnSIIAL 0
3449 4932207 CLAY SINS 0030 GRVl ~lsrlD 0040 (S 0033
0'\ ) CLAY 0048
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -' -
1\
Page 36
WATER WELL DATA SYSTEM 23 OCT 86 PAGE 532 GROUND WATER OULLETIN REPORT
UTl1 CSG KINn ~IATER STAT PUNP TEST TEST OWNER/LOG/SCREEN
CONCESSION WELL EASTING HEV DIA OF FOUND LVL LVL RATE TUIE WATER DEPTlIS IN FEET TO WIIICIf WELL NO.
ETC lOT tlO NORTlIING FEET DATE DRILLER INS WATER FEET fEET FEET GPt.1 IIR/MN USE fORMATIONS EXTEND
MUNICIPALITY CODE 57009 (COIITINUED.. .1
Orillia Township GRtlT 0046 BLCK GRNT 0058 RED GRNT 0072
ULCK GRtIT 0087
NO 17 10 57- 63LI201 730 11/72 1312 6 fR 330 130 10 2/00 no TUCK En T
9981 4958835 GREY CLAY 0010 BLCK GRNT 0330
tlD 17 10 57- 634150 750 10/78 1312 6 fR 300 6 1 no C IWt/K T
16963 4959050 BLCK GIUIT 0390
NO 17 11 57- 634100 725 08/77 2652 6 FR 140 47 4 130 no SCIIDEJ.\AKER GEORGE
14881 4959600 fR 170 BLCK GRNT 0185
NO 17 11 57- 634050 750 10/82 42.-.1 6 Frt 282 15 285 5 DO CARTWRIGIfT C
18252 4958850 BfI~IN SAND GRVl 0001 GREY GRNT 0030 BlCK
GnNT 0050 GflEY GRNT 0060 o RI'lN GRNT 0080
GREY GIUIT 0150 BLCK GIUIT 0210 BR~IN GRNT
0225 BLCK GRNT 0282 BRWN GRtIT 0285
NO 18 11 57- 634800 750 08/82 4241 6 fR 139 16 ILlS 4 no SLATEn C II I: J D
18168 ti959700 BLCK TPSL 0004 BnWN GmIT 0018 GREY GRNT
0095 BLCK GflNT 0132 flED GRNT SOfT 0139
GREY Glun 0145
01 57- 632150 730 06/47 1730 DRY BInD E
3042 4957740 GREY GRNT 0127
01 57- 999999 08/49 2640 5 fR 96 22 DO ALLEN A
3043 9999999 GmlT OH6
01 57- 999999 09/49 2640 5 FR 96 DO lII0I1AS G
304ti 9999999 TPSL OOOLI GRNT 0096
01 57- 999999 09/LI9 2640 5 fR 47 fLW CO BUfWOWS C
3045 9999999 TPSL OOOLI G RtlT 0047
SD 1 1 57- 619LI89 775 12/66 1312 fR 58 LI2 L,5 10 1/00 DO ABDOTT 0
2905 49L,2051 PIWG 0024 BRWN MSND OOLIO GREY CLAY III' AN
Bum 0058 GnYl 0059
SO 1 1 57- 619526 775 09/67 1312 6 fR 58 25 LI5 20 1/00 DO MEt/EKE If
2906 49.-.1957 llHlIN "'St/D 0030 GREY CLAY MSND 0050 QSND
0057 GRVL 0058
SD 1 1 57- 618420 870 07/70 4816 6 fR 316 160 174 10 3/00 DO KANIS A
7L,30 49.-.1390 TPSL 0001 MSND 0005 IIPAN STtIS 0217 L/1SN
0318
SO 1 1 57- 618500 875 09/72 1312 6 fR 132 70 140 4 4/00 CO LEAKIKY LLOYD
9650 4941250 BRim /lPAN SAND 0030 GREY If PAN BLDR 0130
(S 0113 37 ) FSND anYL 0131 GREY /lPAN
BlDR 0150
- SO 1 1 57- 619.-.00 775 09/73 2514 6 fR 101 36 70 10 1/30 DO PAflKES E
10379 49.-.2150 RED SAUD L00S 0025 BRI'lN CLAY SAND SOfT
0035 GREY CLAY SAUD SOfT 0040 GflEY SIILE
CLAY BLDR 0101 GnEY SIILE SILT liARD 0104
SD 1 1 57- 618300 862 06/78 3815 30 FR 5 5 5 115 DO BARKEY KEN
15329 4')(,1350 Bmlt/ TPSI. LOOS 0001 GREY SAUD GRYL LOOS
0005 GIIEY CLAY BLUR IIAIIO 0010
SD 1 1 57- 618700 850 10/75 1312 6 fR 117 87 116 5 1/30 DO KELLEn I~
. 16799 ti942050 BRI'ItI SAIID 0003 BR~1tI CLAY Stmy 0010 GREY
liP AN 0025 GI<EY CLAY StIDY 0060 SAUD GRYl
- COtn !tIUED -
.. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Page 37
WATER WElL DATA SYSTEtl 23 OCT B6 PAGE 533 GROUND WATER BULLETItI REPORT
UTl1 CSG KIND WATEn STAT PLJI-IP TEST TEST OWNER/LOG/SCREEN
CONCESSION WElL EASTING HEY DIA OF fOUND lYL lVL RATE TII'IE WATER DEPTltS III FEET TO WIIICII WELL NO.
ETC lOT NO NORTIIING fEET DATE DnILlER INS WATER fEET fEET fEET Gl'tl flR/I'IN USE fORl1ATIOtlS EXTEND
MUNICIPALITY CODE 57009 (CONTINUED. . . )
DRY 0061 GREY CLAY StlDY 0117 BRWN fSND
0120 (S 0117 03 )
SD 1 1 57- bI')300 625 I1/BO 1312 b ff! 72 30 72 2 /30 DO HUlEKE II
17422 49fl2100 um'IN SAND STNS lOOS 0026 GREY CLAY SAND
0072 BR~IU SAND 0075
SD 1 1 57- 616400 650 05/60 4512 6 fR 176 100 FIO 4 16/00 DO SIIEll J
17426 4941850 GREY flPAN BlDR 0040 GREY CLAY 0120 GREY
liP AN BlDR 0175 SAND GRVl 0176
SD 1 1 57- 618150 875 05/81 2653 6 60 60 15 DO IHJUFORD C
17890 4941700 IIPAN illDR 0050 flPAN 0120 CLAY 0159 SAND
GRVL 0163
SD 1 1 57- 618600 650 07/81 2653 6 fR 210 70 10 2/00 DO GALE D
17893 4941950 IIPAN 0040 CLAY 01',0 IJPAN BlDR 0199 CLAY
SANn 0203 UISN 0210
SD 1 1 57- 616700 650 09/79 2653 30 30 8 DO TlIONPSON R
17915 4941900 IIPAN BlDR CLAY 0090 SILT SAND 0120 GRVL
0125
SD 1 1 57- 618700 850 10/79 2653 30 ~o 10 DO KEf N
17920 4941800 liP AN BLDR 0100 CLAY liP AN 0133 GRVL 0135
SD 1 2 57- 619804 800 10/56 1413 !j fR B2 flW DO L1.0YD B
2907 49f,1410 ~lUE CLAY 0030 SILT 0035 BLUE CLAY 0060
SILT 0070 CLAY GRVL 0082
SD 1 2 57- 619796 800 09/63 1312 6 FR 6f, 30 38 10 2/00 DO WOODS 0
2906 4941570 BRim HSND 00',5 GREY CLAY 0064 GRVl 0067
SD 1 2 57- 616700 675 02/70 4816 6 fR 2,,0 76 154 8 4/00 ST DO BAlm C
7092 4940990 tlSNU 0003 CLAY BlDR 0055 CLAY GRVL 0092
GIIEY CLAY 0203 SILT CLAY 0236 CSUD 0243
(S OiU,2 04 ) GREY CLAY 0246
SD 1 2 57- 618764 875 09/72 1312 6 fR 1',2 70 130 6 24/00 DO SNIDGltI INVESTMENTS
9632 4941310 BIIWN SAND 0010 GIIEY IIPAN BlDR 0100 GREY
CLAY 0120 GREY IIPAN BlDI1 0142 (S 0140
04 ) SAUD GRVL 0l't4
SD 1 2 57- 619311 850 09/72 1312 6 FR ',6 30 35 15 DO MCSORLEY WAYNE
9655 4941025 UIII'ltI SAND GRVL 0025 BRWN SAND 00'.6 (S
00f,5 Of. 1 BI1~n~ CSND CLAY 0050
SD 1 2 57- 6197ft3 810 11/74 ',816 6 FR 112 1 2', 40 2't/00 NU COI'ElAtID J
.11967 4941534 SAND 0022 SILT CLAY 0058 CLAY 0079 CLAY
GnVL 0112 SAND 0130 (S 0114 131 lMSN
0136
SD 1 2 57- 619209 900 11/74 4816 6 DI1Y COPELAND J
11968 4941404 SAND 0009 CLAY GnVL 0019 GRVL 0022 CLAY
GIIVL 0034 SAND 0037 CLAY 0110 fSND 0115
CLAY 0124 SAND 0129 CLAY SAND 0163 Ll1SN
0166
SD 1 2 57- 619362 850 11/7'1 f,B16 6 DHY COPELAND J
11969 4941523 SANI> 0017 CLAY 0024 GHVL 0026 CLAY GRVl
0105 CLAY LI-ISN 0112 UISN 012f,
SD 1 2 57- 619770 615 05/76 '.816 6 FR 3 5f. 80 2',/00 HU BASS LAKE HOODlANOS
- CONTINUED -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Page 38
WATER WELL DATA SYSTEM 23 OCT 86 PAGE 53'1 GROUND WATER BULLETIN REPORT
unt CSG KIND ~IATER STAT PUHP TEST TEST OWNER/LOG/SCREEN
CONCESSION WELL EASTING HEV BIA OF FOUIID LVI. LVI. I!ATE TII'IE WATEn DEPTIIS IU fEET TO ~IIIICII WELL NO.
ETC LOT 110 NORTIIING FEET DATE DI!ILLER INS WATER fEET FEET FEET GPM IIR/tlII USE FORI1ATIONS EXTEND
MUNICIPALITY CODE 57009 (CONTINUED. . . I
13225 4941450 FSND 0027 GREY CLAY 0072 SAND GIWL 0092
FSNLJ 0110 tlSND CSUO 0137 (5 0112 15 I
UISN 01'.0
SD 1 2 57- 619350 845 03/76 4512 6 FR 41 30 33 20 1/00 DO PAWUlAN LARRY
13273 4941050 PIU)G 0032 OI!~IN CSNO 00'14 (S 00't! 03
SO 1 2 57- 619'.50 845 03/76 '1512 6 fl! 53 33 36 25 1/30 DO GL.OVEI! ROY
13274 '19'11030 PllOG 0033 OR~IN SAND 0056 (5 0052 03
SD 1 2 57- 619400 8lt5 03/76 '1512 6 FR '1'1 30 33 20 1/00 DO LEDUC I!ICI/AIID
13275 '19'.1050 PIWG 0033 OIlWN HSIID 00'17 (S 00'.4 03
SD 1 2 57- 619800 825 07181 2653 6 FR 60 10 20 2/00 DO DOUGLAS B
17897 '1941500 FSND 0055 (S 005'1 03 I SAND GRVL 0060
SD 1 3 57- 619937 827 02/60 1312 (, FR 6 3'1 34 10 3/00 CO ~IOOD G
2909 '1941091 GRVL OLDR 0040
SD 1 3 57- 619929 827 10/6'\ 1312 6 FR '10 29 '10 'I DO GI LLETT A
2910 49'10975 BRIm CLAY 0010 BR~III GrNL /lPAN 0035 tlS11D
00'18
SD 1 3 57- 619942 827 10/6'\ 1312 6 fR 46 15 34 10 2/00 DO GILLETT A
2911 '1941071 GRVL I/PAN 00'10 NSND GRVL 0045 GRVL 0049
SD 1 3 57- 619675 827 05/67 4608 30 FR 18 18 2 DO 1I0OElHSON V
2912 '1940633 IHUIl~ CLAY 0018 STNS GRVL 0022
SD 1 3 57- 619714 827 10/67 4606 30 FR 25 25 2 DO OTTNAD E J
2913 4940704 TPSL 0001 GRVL 0010 HSUD 0036
SD 1 3 57- 620042 827 03/65 1312 6 FR 53 37 45 20 1/00 CO ~IOODS G
2931 49'11083 PlmR 00'.0 GRVL /lPAN 0052 GRVL HSNO 0054
SD 1 3 57- 619770 850 06/69 4606 30 FR 25 23 30 1/00 DO COOlIBES E
6355 '1941100 FR 33 GIIEY GIWL 0027 GREY CSIIO 0033
SO 1 3 57- 619450 850 05/70 4606 30 FI! 21 7 15 1/15 DO SCI/ULZ CARL
7162 4940750 FI! 28 GI!EY CLAY sms 0008 GREY HSIID CSIID 0028
SD 1 3 57- 619700 850 04/70 1312 6 fl! '13 35 36 12 1/00 DO COOHOS E
7299 4941040 PIIDG 0034 BR\'IN GRVL I/PAN 0040 BRWN GRVL
00'13
SO 1 3 57- 619756 850 08/72 1312 6 FR 43 28 36 15 1/00 ST BACKUS J
9628 49'10915 BruiN GRVL SAND 0022 GREY CLAY 00'10 HSIIO
GHVL 00'.2 GIIVL 00'13
SO 1 :5 57- 619564 850 09/72 1312 6 fR 36 31 32 7 1/00 DO /lEBERT
9633 4940941 GI!VL 0030 ORWN liP AN 0037 GRVL 0039
SD 1 3 57- 619550 845 09/72 1312 6 FI! '15 29 32 15 1/00 DO /lASTE J
9M'I 49'11050 Brum SAND GRVL 0020 GREY CLAY SNDY 0042
GflVL SANU 00'.5
SO 1 3 57- 619680 850 10/72 1312 6 FR '10 29 30 10 1/00 DO UE ~II LUE C
9654 49'.0914 GRVL 0020 (lPAN SANU 0039 GRVL 00'.0
SD 1 3 57- 619550 840 10/73 '1713 6 FR 52 28 28 20 2/30 DO CIIAHfORD BHIAN
10735 4940700 BfIIlt~ BLDII GRVL LYRD 0035 B R~III SAND GRVL
LYIID 0052
SO 1 3 57- 619600 840 10/73 4713 6 fR 55 28 28 20 2/30 no CIIAWfOIlD
10136 4940700 BfI~1N GHVL STNS LYRD 0040 BRWN GRVL SAND
LOOS 0055
SO 1 3 57- 61970B 840 02/74 1312 6 fR 39 30 33 8 1/00 DO GILETT ALVIN
11753 '19'11000 BRI'IN SAND GflVL 0039
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - -
Page 39
WATER WELL DATA SYSTEI1 23 OCT 86 PAGE 535 GROUND WATER BUllETIN REPORT
unl CSG KINO WATEn STAT PUIoJP TEST TEST OWNER/LOG/SCREEN
CONCESSION WELL EASTING HEV DIA Of fOUNU LVL LVL RATE TINE WATER DEI' I liS IN fEET TO ~IIIICII WELL NO.
ETC LOT NO NOIHIIING fEET DATE DRILLER INS WATER fEET fEET fEET GPN 'In/NN USE fORMATIONS EXTENU
MUNICIPALITY CODE 57009 (CONTINUED... )
SO 1 3 57- 619000 845 06/76 4512 6 fR 39 2lt 28 15 1/00 DO .)OIlNSTON G
13271 4941900 BHNN SAND 0006 GREY CLAY 0030 SAND GRVL
0039
SO 1 3 57- 619700 845 03/76 4512 6 fR lilt 33 37 12 1/00 DO RAIISAY RICK
13276 4941050 PImG 0036 BRWN SAND 00117 (S 0043 03 )
SO 1 3 57- 619600 830 11/77 4512 6 FR 40 21 30 10 1/30 DO KITTAN fHED
15404 4940600 Dlum GRVL SNDY 0040
SO 1 3 57- 619400 830 11/77 4512 6 FR 33 19 27 10 1/00 DO TUCIIEl E
15405 4940700 BHWN GRVL SNDY 0033 JoISND GRVL 0036 (S
0033 03 ) GHEY liP AN CLAY 0036
SO 1 3 57- 619500 825 07/78 2653 6 fR 183 183 15 DO CLAHKSON R
15664 4940700 pROG 0021 SAND CLAY SILT 0100 CLAY III' AN
0160 SILT 0198 GRVL 0203
SO 1 3 57- 619400 850 07/75 1312 6 FR 29 19 26 5 1/00 DO PIpEn L
16966 4940750 BR~IN CLAY SNDY 0026 (S 0026 03 ) BRWN
SAND GRYL 0032
SO 1 3 57- 619600 850 06/75 1312 6 FR 33 24 27 10 DO BACKUS J
16966 4941000 BRWI! CLAY SNDY 0030 CGYL 0033
SO 1 3 57- 619900 650 10/75 1312 6 Fn 35 30 31 7 1/00 DO SUTIIEnLAND D
16973 4941000 BrIWN CLAY 0008 BRWN SAUD GRVL 0035
SO 1 3 57- 6191100 850 09/80 4512 6 fR 24 16 23 7 1/00 UO BAYIIAIW W
17424 4940700 DnWI! GRYL SNOY 0028 (S 0024 04 )
SO 1 3 57- 619000 650 06/62 4241 6 fn 59 11 55 4 3/00 DO AHTIBEllO n
16066 4940600 BLCK TpSL 0001 B n~11! CLAY SAND 0020 GREY
CLAY GRYL 0025 BRWN SAND CLAY 0045 GREY
CLAY 0059
SO 1 4 57- 620250 845 06/76 4512 6 fR 311 24 26 12 1/00 DO BACKUS JACK
13281 4940800 BH~IN SAND 0008 GREY CLAY SNDY 0033 CGYL
0035
SO 1 4 57- 620250 845 11/76 4512 6 fR 35 27 30 12 1/00 DO POTTEn CALYEN
14063 4940850 BlnlN SAND GHVL 0037 (S 0034 03 )
SO 1 4 57- 620250 830 Oll/7] 4512 6 fR 33 16 25 12 /30 DO BMItIES GEORGE
15390 4940850 Blllm GRYL SNny 0033 BRWN CSND 0036 (S
0033 03 )
SO 1 4 57- 620500 850 08/80 2653 6 fR 63 30 30 5 DO ounNS K
17338 4940500 "tUCK SAND 0025 liP AN CLAY 0055 GRYL SAND
0063
SO 1 5 57- 620808 925 05/59 2514 6 FR 2115 130 210 20 4/00 PS DEPT OF L AND F
2914 4939813 TPSL tlSND GRYL 0001 BRWN CLAY 0110 FSND
0150 BLUE CLAY cSlm 0238 GRYL 02...5
SO 1 5 57- 619500 850 12/77 2514 6 fn 193 55 70 15 3/30 DO CHOSSEN J
15094 ...939600 B/II'IN ClAY BLon liARD 00116 GRVL 0055 GREY
CLAY STNS IIAtH> 0193 BR~IN GRYL I1GIW 0196
SO 1 5 57- 519200 900 12/81 2653 6 fn ...0 liD llO 20 DO K HIES G
17927 4939100 III' AN BLDR 0035 GRYL 0039 SAND OOllO
SO 1 6 57- 621114 900 03/60 4713 6 FR 200 60 IllS 15 5/00 ST DO JOIINSTON E
2915 4939357 TPSL 0002 CLAY STNS 0060 NSND 0145 CLAY
BLOR 0195 GRYL SNUY 0200
SD 1 6 57- 620400 940 03/70 ll713 6 fR 231 105 225 5 2/30 DO JOIINSTONE E
- CorlTINUED -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Page 40
WATER WElL DATA SYSTEtI 23 OCT 86 PAGE 536 GROUND WATER BULLETIN REPORT
UTI1 CSG KIND I~ATER STAT PUN I' TEST TEST OWNER/LOG/SCREEN
CONCESSION WELL EASTING ELEV DIA Of fOUND LVL LVI. RATE TINE WATER DEPT/lS IN FEET TO WIIICI! WELL ..m.
ETC LOT NO NORTlIItIG FEET DATE DRILLER ItIS WATER fEET fEET fEET (,1'11 /lR/HN USE fORHATIONS EXTEND
MUNICIPALITY CODE 57009 (CONTINUED... )
7631 4939440 BRWN CLAY HStlD STNS 0065 BLUE CLAY 0080
BRWN HStm 0112 GREY MSND CLAY 0208 GREY
NSND SILT 0220 OR~IN /'ISNO 0231 (S 0223
08 )
SO 1 7 57- 621317 925 08/62 4713 6 fR 100 70 90 10 2/00 DO WOOD J
2916 4939241 TI'SL 0002 CLAY STNS 0080 GRVL NSND 0100
IS 0092 08 I
SO 1 10 57- 621450 900 11172 1312 6 fR 33 17 30 12 8/00 DO RICIINOND ALEX
9647 4936750 CGVL 0033 BRWN MSND GRVL 0037 IS 0033
04 I
SO 1 10 57- 621750 870 09174 2514 6 fR 258 99 160 10 3/00 DO TORR IE GLENN
11648 4937150 fILL LOOS 0001 BRWN CLAY GRVL BLDR 0017
YlLH SAND GRVL I.IARO 0031 YLLW SAND CLAY
PCKD 00'13 ORWt! CLAY SAND I'CKO 0101 GREY
ClAY PCKO DRY 0173 GREY CLAY SANh liARD
0188 GREY CLAY SAND GRVl 0250 GREY LHSN
IIAIW 0260
SO 1 10 57- 621300 900 09/75 1312 (, fR 23 17 22 18 1/30 CO IHCIINONO A
15513 4936800 ORWN CLAY SNOY 0010 GRVL 0026 (5 0023
03 I
SO 1 11 57- 622959 825 05/66 1312 6 fR 31 5 27 10 2/00 DO HITCIIELL L
2917 4936682 CLAY NStlD 0010 BRWN CLAY BLDR 0025 MSND
0031 GRVL 0032
SO 1 12 57- 623047 800 09/64 1312 6 fR 45 10 30 10 2/00 DO TAYLOR A
2918 4936538 oRlm CLAY IIPAN 0010 GREY CLAY I!PAN 0045
IS 0033 0'1 I BRWN HSND 00',7 GflEY CLAY
IIPAN 0125
SO 1 13 57- 623400 755 06176 4512 6 fR 54 13 24 10 DO lULIPANO TONY
14040 4935950 ORWt! SAND fILL 0002 BLCK PEAT 0006 GREY
CLAY SNOY 0054 CGVL 0054
SO 1 13 57- 623350 750 09179 2653 30 30 8 DO OAKER S
17916 4936000 SAND CLAY 0020 /lPAN CLAY 0073 S/lLE Ll1SN
0076
SO 1 14 57- 623481 750 10/64 4713 fR 93 18 35 20 2/00 CO GREER P
2919 4935005 PROG 0018 MSNO CLAY 0030 CLAY 0091 GRVL
0093
SO 1 14 57- 623699 725 06/67 3413 30 fR 20 10 20 5 2'1/00 DO KROEKEI~ B
2920 4935230 BLUE CLAY 0010 HSND 0035
- SO 1 14 57- 623550 750 06/69 {1713 6 fR 65 20 50 10 1/00 CO GIBSON H
7200 4935020 DHWN CLAY STNS 0026 BRWN MSND CLAY 0060
ElHWN GRVl NSUD 0065
SO 1 14 57- 623500 765 09/71 {1713 (, fR 76 22 60 3 2/00 00 nAVIS I'
8560 4934850 OR~IN CLAY GRVL 0070 ORWN GRVL SANO 0076
SO 1 14 57- 623600 750 0{,/80 2653 20 20 10 48/00 DO RITTER f
17347 4935300 SAND liP AN 0035 GRVL 0062 IIPAtI ClAY 0084
UIStI 00B5
SD 1 14 57- 623850 750 0',/80 2653 no KIWEKEH B
17348 4935200 PIInG 0030 SAND CLAY IIPAN 0061
SO 1 15 57- 623393 775 08/63 3711 30 FR 25 20 25 3 2{j/00 ST TAYLOII A
.:121 493{1{130 TPSL 0003 BLUE CLAY 0025 CSND 0035
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Page 41
WATER WEll ~ATA SYSTEM B OCT 86 PAGE ~,9:5 GROUND WATER nULI.ETIN REPORT
unl CSG KIND WATEII STAT PUMP TEST TEST OWNER/lOG/SCREEN
CONCESSION WELL EASTING HEV DIA Of fOUND lVL LVL IIATE TillE WATER DEPTlIS IN FEET TO WHCII WELL NO.
ETC LOT NO NORTlIING fEET DATE DRILLER INS WATER FEET FEET FEET GPH tIIl/MN USE fOR~IA TIONS EXTEND
MUNICIPALITY CODE 57008 (CONTINUED... )
17684 ~,926900 SAND CRVL STtIS 0018 CLAY FGVL 0027 FSND
00'\2 (S OO~IO 0'\ I CSND 00'\7 FSND GRVL
00~18
CON 12 45 57- 556900 700 05/81 4816 6 fR 21 6 21 5 2/45 DO FLEIHNG G
17685 4926950 CLAY GRVL BLDR 0021 (S 0017 05 ) CSND
0027 FSND GRVL 00:55
MUNICIPALITY CODE 57009
Orillia Township
CON 13 21 57- 626000 725 07/80 2517 I> 68 19 5 2/00 DO DAYVIEW WILDWOOD liE
17263 '96B50 BIIWN TPSL 0002 DR~IN CLAY LTCl 0015 GREY
FSND 0022 DLCK GliNT 0067 RED GRNT 0069
DLCK QfZ 023~,
CON 13 21 57- 625650 750 03/82 2550 6 I'll 119 3 45 20 1/00 DO STANTON E
17991 4961'\50 DIIWN SAND PCKD OOO~. GREY GRNT HGIID SOFT
0120
NO 1 1 57- 618860 825 12/54 B12 6 I'll 90 70 89 8 ~tlOO PS ORI LLI A SCIIOOL DOARD
2713 49'\2300 CLAY OLD II 0(1(11 FStlD 0050 ~ISND 0100 (S
0091 O~. ) OlUE CLAY 0115
NO 1 1 57- 616160 670 11/70 4608 30 FR 15 9 17 5 1/00 DO ~IEUlICKI JOIIII
7671 4941840 I'll 2~. BRWN ClAY SHlS 0015 GREY CLAY STtIS 0024
NO 1 1 57- 6179'\0 875 08/76 ~.2~.1 6 FR BO 52 12 5/00 DO FRANCESCO PASQUALE
B665 4942060 BRNN SAND GRVL 0027 GREY CLAY MSND GRVL
0068 GREY CLAY SHDY 0079 GREY CLAY SAND
SLTY 0129 GREY FStlD CLAY liARD OBI
NO 1 1 57- 618050 675 01/61 ~,245 6 FR 190 102 172 6 6/00 DO VAN ANDEL G
17264 4942050 DLCK TPSL 0003 BRWN SAND GRVL DLDR 0030
GREY CLAY 0068 GREY SILT CLAY SOFT 0110
GREY CLAY 0134 GREY SILT SAND GRVL 0160
GREY CLAY SILT 0180 GREY IIPAN 0188 GREY
fSND GRVL 0191 UNKN 0192
NO 1 2 57- 618130 825 12/54 14B 4 FR 92 65 70 5 2/00 DO LLOYD B
2714 4942970 CLAY GIIVL 0014 liP AN BLDR 0090 GRVL tlSND
0092
ND 1 2 57- 618060 825 10/67 2514 6 I'll 98 65 90 6 3/30 DO LEE W
2715 49'\2925 PIIDG 00~.2 DRWN CLAY HStlD BLDR 0098 HSND
GRVL 0102 (S 0099 03 I
ND 1 2 57- 618060 825 09/67 ~.608 30 FR 40 37 2 DO LEE W
2716 49~.2925 DR~IN CLAY STNS 0025 GREY CLAY STtIS 0040
NO 1 2 57- 617550 665 10/69 ~.606 30 fR 25 12 20 2 1/30 DO DOWIS IIARVEY
6811 49'\25'\0 BIIWN CLAY STNS 0025 GREY GRVL 0037
NO 1 2 57- 617680 650 05/70 4608 30 FR 27 19 27 1/30 DO HAIEII JOliN
7167 49'\2650 FR 35 BliNN CLAY STtlS 0037
NO 1 2 57- 617570 860 05/70 (,608 30 FR 15 8 16 1/15 DO BAIEn JOliN
7168 4942610 I'll 31 DRWN CLAY STNS 0031
NO 1 2 57- 617950 835 06170 (,816 6 FR 125 60 65 ~o ~./OO DO WAS5fHAAn K
7198 49'\2800 OUIIN 11St/D 0020 tlSND CLAY 0050 liP AN 0100
GRVL CSNO 0127 (S 0123 O~. I
NO 1 2 57- 617520 865 06170 (.816 6 FR 183 95 175 2 2/00 DO CREum IIARny
- CONTINUED -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Page 42
WATER WEll nATA SYSTEM 23 OCT 86 PAGE ll9lt GIWUND WATER DUllHIN REPORT
UTl1 CSG KIND WATER STAT PUI1P TEST TEST OWNER/lOG/SCREEN
CONCESSION WEll EASTING ElEV OIA OF fOUND LVl lVL RATE TUIE WATER DEPT/lS IN FEET TO ~IIIlC/I WELL NO.
ETC lOT NO NORTlIING FEET DATE DRILLER INS WATER FEET FEET FEET GPM IIR/HN USE fORMATIONS EXTEND
MUNICIPALITY CODE 57009 (CONTINUED... )
7435 4942580 TPSL MStID 0010 ClAY DlDR 0055 GRVL 0062
HSND 0085 CLAY 0183 (S 0181 Olt ) GRVL
DIM CLAY 0185
NO 2 57- 617730 860 07/71 1312 6 FR 85 40 70 10 7/00 DO LE LIVER
8575 49112570 DRWN CLAY SAND 0040 GREY CLAY 0085 (S
OU84 Oll ) Bn~1N SANO 0088
NO 1 2 57- 617658 850 03/72 4608 30 fR 35 32 41 2 1/00 DO SCOTT ALAN
8801 4942684 BlUm SAtIU STNS 0022 GREY CLAY STtIS 0045
110 1 2 57- 617666 875 06/72 ll608 30 fR 32 25 33 5 1/30 DO IIORCIIHOUNT BAPTIST
8865 4942408 BRWtl CL.AY STNS 0032 GREY GRVl STNS 0040
NO 1 2 57- 617664 850 08/72 1312 6 FR 74 35 74 7 2/00 DO SCOTT AUAN
9630 4942675 pnOG 0037 GnEY CLAY SAND 0050 GnEY CLAY
0074 Bn~IN t1SNO 0080 (S 0074 06 I
NO 1 2 57- 618050 840 01/76 2514 6 FR 96 65 79 10 1/00 DO WASSENAAlt E
13066 4942690 I'ROG 0015 Bn~IN GRVl CLAY BlDR 00~8 GREY
CLAY SAND GRVl 0096 BrmN FGVL HGVL 0097
NO 1 2 57- 617650 855 06/76 4241 6 FR 90 36 68 18 2/30 DO AOEnNATlIY CONST
13270 4942580 REI) FSIID 0007 BRWN SAIID GRVl CLAY 0046
GUEY CLAY 0087 ORWN FSND 0091
NO 1 2 57- 617660 855 08/76 4241 6 FR 91 38 20 4/00 DO ADERNETlIY CONSTR
13682 49lt2550 RED FSIID 0007 BRWN SAND GRVl CLAY ~Olt')
GREY CLAY 0087 DRWN FSND HStlD GRVL 0092
NO 1 2 57- 617930 850 08/76 4241 6 FR 100 61 18 4/00 DO JIH NIC/lOl CONSTR
13683 4942610 BRWN SAND GUVL 0032 GREY CLAY 0074 BRWN
CLAY SNDY 0098 BRWII HSIID CSND 0100
NO 2 57- 617850 845 08/76 4241 6 FR 103 64 20 4/00 DO ADERNA TlIY COIISTR
13684 4942600 ilIUm SAND GRVl 0034 GREY CLAY 0078 BRWN
FStlU CLAY 0102 BRI'IN Hsrm cSlm 0104
NO 1 2 57- 617800 865 11/76 4512 6 FR 101 70 95 It 3/00 DO /lASTE JOliN
14058 4942450 B/II~N CLAY SNDY 0008 GREY CLAY 0101 GRVL
0101
NO 1 2 57- 617850 835 05/77 4241 6 FR 78 49 15 3/00 DO VRIELING J F
14134 4942750 BRIm SAND 0016 GREY CLAY 0035 GREY CLAY
GRVl SAND 0049 BfII~N SAND GRVl 0068 GREY
CLAY SNDY 0074 BRWII FStlD FGVL 0080 GRVL
0080
NO 1 2 57- 618500 835 10/77 2514 6 FR 99 60 89 15 2/30 DO WASSENAAR CONSTR
15086 4942400 TPSl DKCL 0001 BnWN CLAY STNS BlOR 0078
BRNN GIWL CLAY BLDR 0099 BnWN SANO GRVL
0107 (S 0099 03 I
ND 1 2 57- 618100 840 11178 ll241 r, FR 100 70 75 15 2/00 DO NOllOY J
15630 49lt2900 rHH~N HUCK BlDR 0021 BRWN IIPAtI 00lt3 BRI'IN
CLAY 0055 Bm~1I BlDR GRVL 0000 Dmm SAND
0096 REO SAlm 0101 (S 0093 03 I
ND 1 2 57- 617800 850 08/79 4245 6 FR 110 65 100 S 2/30 DO WASSENAAn K
162ltl 4942650 BLCK TI'Sl 0005 BR~1tI FStID 0010 BRIm CLAY
OOS5 GREY CLAY 0075 BRIm CLAY SAUD 0083
Bn~1N /II' All 0103 BRWN HStlD tfGVL 0112 (S
- CONTINUED -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- -
Page 43
WATER WELL DATA SYSTEM 23 OCT 86 PAGE 495 GHOUND WATER BULLETIN REPORT
unl CSG KIND HATER STAT pUNp TEST TEST OW~ER/LOG/SCREEN
CONCESSION WELL EASTING HEY DIA Of fOUND LYL LYL RATE TII'IE WATER DEpTlIS IN FEET TO \~IIICII WELL .00.
ETC LOT NO NORTlIING fEET DATE DRILLER INS WATER fEET fEET fEET GpM IIRI/IN USE fORMATIONS EXTEND
MUNICIPALITY CODE 57009 (CONTINUED.. .1
0109 03 1
1m 1 2 57- 617900 850 08/79 4245 (, fR 95 58 75 DO WASSENAAR P
16343 4~)l,2800 OH~IN FSND 0015 OR~IN SAND GRYL pCKD 0032
GREY SAtlD GRYL OLDR 0065 GREY SILT 0070
GHEY GRVL SILT 0080 GREY GnYL Bum 0094
Bm'lI~ NSND HGYL 0095
NO 1 2 57- 618600 825 08/75 1312 6 fR 99 50 'H 7 DO POTTER R
16975 4943250 BR~lt/ SAND 0006 BRWtl IIpAN BLDR 0012 GREY
CLAY 0099 (S 0098 03 1 GRYL 0101
NO 1 2 57- 617950 850 04/81 4245 (, fR 91 58 61 20 7/00 DO WASSEIIAAR K
17377 4942800 BIU/N SAIID GRYL 0028 GREY CLAY SILT SOfT
0036 GREY SILT CLAY 0060 GREY IIpAtI 0090
BRI/II SAtlD GRY!. 0091
ND 1 2 57- 618600 825 07/79 2653 50 50 10 3/00 DO POlTER R
17912 4943250 IIpAN BLDR 0060 IIPAN CLAY 0107 SAND GRYL
0109
NO 1 2 57- 618650 825 01/79 2653 60 60 10 DO POlTER R
17921 4943300 IIPAN BLDR CLAY 0100 SAND GRYL 0106
ND 1 3 57- 616310 625 12/64 1312 6 fR 110 50 106 3 2/00 DO CAnps B
2717 4943600 PIWG 0009 GRYL !fPAN 0050 QSND 0060 GREY
CLAY 0110 (S 0106 04 1 NSND 0112
NO 1 3 57- 618050 825 09/65 2514 fR 96 66 76 20 2/00 DO \'/ASSENAAR E
2716 4942960 PIWG 0043 CLAY tlSND BLDR 0098 YLLW 11SND
0101 (S 0098 03 )
NO 1 3 57- 617930 830 05/70 4816 6 fR 120 55 60 10 3/00 DO WASSENAAR E
7199 4942900 TpSL tiS NO 0015 tlSND CLAY 0035 IIrAN 0104
tlS11U GRVL 0120 (S 0116 0(, 1
ND 1 3 57- 618041 830 05/72 1312 6 fR 114 40 110 5 2/00 DO WI LSOI/ I/ORl1AI/
9642 49(13263 IWWN III' AN 0060 GREY IIrAN 0090 BLCK fSND
0092 GREY CLAY 0105 GHEY IIpAI/ 0114 (S
0110 04 ) BRI'II/ SANU GnVL 0115
NO 1 3 57- 616261 830 05/74 1312 6 fR 20 11 17 6 DO IIASTE JOliN
11754 4943179 ORl/N SAND GRYL 0020
ND 1 3 57- 618313 630 05/74 1312 6 fR 23 13 18 6 2/00 DO IIASTE JOlltl
11755 4943201 UlmN SAIID GRYL 002', CLAY 0025
NO 1 3 57- 616545 825 10/74 1312 6 fR 52 47 51 12 2/00 DO IIASTE JOliN
11761 4943365 um~N SAW) 0005 GREY III' AN BLOR 0025 GREY
CLAY 0047 OHWII SAND 0056 (S 0051 03 )
III' AN 0057
tlD 1 :5 57- 617650 645 02/77 4241 6 fR 101 66 20 2/30 DO WASSENAAR KOOS CONST
14036 4942800 UH~IN NSlm GHVL 0016 BRHN SAND CLAY SLTY
00,,6 GHEY CLAY 0082 UHWI/ SAIID fGIW NGRD
0101
1m 1 3 57- 616600 625 07/76 4512 6 f/l 80 ,,0 70 10 1/00 UO IIASTE J
15976 4943(,50 BI<WI/ CLAY SI/UY 0010 GREY IIPAtl 0025 GREY
CLAY 0000 filUm SAND GHVL 0002
-: NO 1 :5 57- 618250 650 01/79 4512 6 fR 135 95 100 8 1/00 DO LLOYD A
16793 4943650 URWN GRYL StlDY 0030 URWN IIrAN BLDR 0090
- cOin II/UED -
".. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Page 44
WATER WELL DATA SYSTEM 23 OCT 66 PAGE 496 GHOUND WATER BULLETIN REPORT
UTl1 CSG KIND ~IATER STAT PUBP TEST TEST OIINER/LOG/SCREEN
CONCESSION WELL EASTING ELEV DIA OF fOUlm LVL LVL RATE TItlE WATER DEPTIIS IN fEET TO WIIlCII WELL NO.
ETC LOT NO NORTIIING fEET DATE DRILLER INS WATER FEET FEET fEET GPI1 Im/I'IN USE fOHMATIONS EXTEND
MUNICIPALITY CODE 57009 I CONTI tlUED. . . )
BIUlN FSIID 0105 GREY CLAY 0125 GREY IIPAN
0133 CStlO CGVL 0135
NO 1 3 57- 618'150 8'10 11/79 4512 6 fR 151 80 1(,7 3 1/30 DO IIASTE J
16794 49'13(.00 OIum CLAY SNDY 0010 GREY CLAY 0070 GREY
SAND SUY 0073 GREY CLAY 0151 IS 0147
03 ) fjHl~N SAND 0152
NO 1 3 57- 618600 825 11/75 1312 t: fH 88 46 82 5 3/00 DO IIASTE J
16971 49'13350 Bn~IN SAtlD 000(, BRWN IIPAN StlDY 0089 IS
0086 0(, ) Bmm SAND 0090
No 1 3 57- 618050 825 07/75 1312 6 fR 110 54 100 10 1/00 DO WI LSor~ J
16981 4943200 BRWU IIPAN 0034 GREY liP AN 0050 GREY CLAY
0075 GHEY liP AN 0110 CGVL 0110
No 1 3 57- 618550 825 09/81 2653 6 60 60 10 DO IIASTE J
17867 4943(,00 BLUR liP AN 0025 liP AN CLAY 0120 SAND GRVL
0128
NO 1 3 57- 618600 825 06/79 2653 FR 66 40 40 10 DO IIASTE J
17909 4943400 liP AN BlDR 0030 CLAY 0055 SAND CLAY 0060
SAND GRVL 0068
NO 1 4 57- 616650 650 01/79 2653 190 190 10 99/59 DO FO~llEn A
17905 49'13700 liP AN 00{,5 liP AN CLAY 0195 SILT 0215 FSND
GRVL 0230
NO 1 5 57- 616576 850 03/72 4616 8 FR 58 FLW 27 150 24/00 tlU HIP Of I-IEDONTE
8757 49'14313 BlCK I-IUCK 0006 FSND 0027 BRWN CLAY 0056
fSND 0086 IS 0060 2{, ) (S 0084 06 )
GREY CLAY 0069 SAIIO GRVl 0096 CLAY GRVL
0106 GREY CLAY 0183 CLAY lI1SU 0192 UISN
0198
lID 1 5 57- 616557 850 03/72 4816 2 FR 26 FLW 3 24/00 tlU TWP OF tlEDONTE
8758 49{t4316 SAUD GRVL 0026 fSND 0066 SAUD GRVL 0105
CLAY 0115
NO 1 5 57- 617900 860 11/76 4512 6 FR 27 10 20 15 1/00 DO C N II C
15695 4944690 BRWN liP AN BLDR 0027 BRWN CSUD 0030
NO 1 5 57- 616600 850 10/80 4512 6 FR 35 3 2(, 12 1100 DO IIASTE J
17405 4943750 BHWN SAUD 0005 GREY CLAY DLDR SNDY 0015
GHEY CLAY 0035 SArlO tlGVL 0038 IS 0035
03 I
NO 1 5 57- 616700 850 10/80 4512 6 FR 34 2 33 12 1/20 DO IIASTE J
17407 4943900 BHlIN SAND 0003 GREY CLAY 0034 DRWN SAND
GHVL 0038 IS 0035 03 )
NO 1 5 57- 616750 850 10/80 4512 6 fR 35 35 12 DO IIASTE J
17406 49'13600 PROG FILL 0002 BRWN SAND 0005 GREY CLAY
0035 FSND 0036 IS 0035 03 )
NO 1 8 57- 615620 680 03/65 1312 6 FR 83 31 80 5 2/00 DO GOOUBAtI
2719 4945770 BRWU CL.AY 0022 BLCK NSND 0026 GREY IIPAN
UL.OI{ 0030 GHEY CLAY OO{,O BR~IN BSND 0046
GREY CLAY 0075 GREY IIPAN SHIS 0080 WIIlT
IIPAU BLUR 0083 GHEY SIILE 0084 GRVL SIILE
0085
ND 1 10 57- 615860 780 10/75 (,241 6 SlI 7{, 114 183 3 1/45 LAfORCE K
- CONTINUED -
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - -
..
Page 45
WATER WElL DATA SYSTEI1 23 OCT 86 PAGE 1j97 GROUND WATER BULLETIN REPORT
um CSG KIND HATER STAT PUHP TEST TEST OWNER/LOG/SCREEN WELL'NO.
CONCESSION WEll EASTlNG HEV DIA Of FOUND LVL LVL RATE TI~tE WATER DEPTIIS IN fEET TO \1IIICII
ETC lOT NO NORTIIING fEET DATE DRILLER INS WATER fEET fEET HET GPH IIR/NN USE foRI1ATIOIIS EXTEND
MUNICIPALITY CODE 57009 (CONTINUEt). . . )
12563 4947',90 SU 183 BRWN SAND GRVL BLDR 0025 GREY ClAY GRVl
0065 DRWN SILT 0074 BHWN IIPAN 0088 WlIlT
LNSN 0183
NO 1 10 57- 616050 775 07179 2653 8 50 6 DO BOYD D
17911 49',7200 liP AN CLAY 0059 UISN 0063
NO 1 10 57- 615850 775 11179 2653 80 2 DO !JUliN R
11922 4947500 /lPAN CLAY 0065 LI1SN 0219 GRNT 0227
NO 1 13 57- 614980 660 12/69 4816 6 fR 10 29 31 7 3/00 ST DO HALTERS G
6972 4948850 NSND CLAY SINS 0047 GRVL 0050 SINS 0053
BIU'IN LNSN 0074
ND 1 14 57- 613850 675 04/76 2653 (, fR 7 22 '. DO BIll SIIAI'!
13186 49490,,0 /lPAN SINS 0016 LNSN 0032
NO 1 15 57- 613320 610 07163 1312 6 FR 24 10 G1HlIRIE J
2720 4949630 SIILE BLDR 0020 GREY UISN 0050 BLUE STNS
0082
NO 1 15 57- 613320 610 01/63 1312 6 FR 20 n 26 10 1/00 DO GUTlIR I E J
2721 4949650 /II' AN BLDI~ 0016 GREY UtSN 00"!.3
NO 1 15 57- 613277 670 09/73 2614 6 fR 61 15 2', 3 2/00 no PIUPPS A-KILBY E
10365 4949575 IIPAN BLUR 0012 U\SN 0067
NO 1 15 57- 611j184 700 12/73 1312 6 fR 120 50 220 2 2/00 DO GOOD CIlIlD RON
10683 495021j0 BI!~JN CLAY BlDR 00'10 GREY SlIlE UtSN 0057
RED UISN 0120 RED GmH 0226
NO 1 15 57- 613250 675 03/81 2656 5 fR 78 80 3 1/00 DO KIlUY I'
17316 4949500 BRI'IN TPSL BLDR CLAY 0018 Wit IT LI1SN 0080
NO 1 24 57- 611250 610 09/79 41j01 6 8 40 10 2/10 DO HACPIIAPEU T
16902 4951j700 BlCK ClAY 0001j BlCK GRNT 0055
NO 2 2 57- 618780 815 05/6"/ 4608 30 FR 10 10 2 DO fEHGUSON K
2722 491j"!.215 HSNO 0008 MSND GRVL 0010 GREY CLAY MSND
0028
NO 2 2 51- 618760 815 07/67 4608 30 fR 15 16 2 DO GORnASII S
2723 4943250 ~ISNl) OO"!.O
ND 2 2 57- 618730 810 08/70 2512 5 fR 112 30 82 7 1/00 DO SCOTT OURT
1462 4943"!.00 BRI'/N MSNO 0010 GREY ClAY 0095 BRWN GRVL
0109 GREY HISN 0112
tlD 2 2 57- 619900 750 09/78 3660 DRY KYLE V
15516 4944100 PHnG 0025 ORHN SAND GRVL DRY 0046 GREY
SANl) GHVl CI1TO 0065 GREY CLAY GRVl 0071
lNSN OHY 01',6
- ND 2 2 57- 619900 750 09/78 3660 f fR 70 :5 2 2/00 DO KYLE V
15517 4943900 OlCK TPSL 0001 BR.WN SAND 0016 GREY CLAY
GRVl 0053 UISN 0070
NO 2 It 57- 619100 730 09/18 '.512 6 FR 23 1 16 8 1/00 DO 11ITCIIELL R
16017 49(,5(,00 PIWG 0017 GREY IIrAN 0023 GREY SIILE UISN
0028
NO 2 4 57- 619100 no 08/15 1312 6 fit 21 9 23 10 2/00 DO S HIPSON R
16979 49'j5"!.00 BH~IN CLAY SNDY 0007 GREY CLAY 0012 GREY
IWAN 0027 GnVL 0028
tlO 2 5 57- 619000 750 10/76 1312 6 fR 105 1 100 4 6/00 DO SIt-IPSON JII1
- CONTINUED -
q - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
n~s Page 46
WATER WEll _riTA SYSTEM 2~ OCT 86 PAGE 155 GROUND WATER BUllETIN REPORT
Un! CSG KIND WATER STAT PUI'II' TEST TEST OWNER/lOG/SCREEN WELL NO.
CONCESSION WEll EASTING ElEV DIA OF FOUND lVl lVl HATE TIllE WATER DEPTHS IN FEET TO WltICH
ETC LOT NO NORTltING FEET DATE DRILLER HIS WA TEn FEET FEET FEET GPH IIR/HN USE FORMATIONS EXTEND
Flos 'lbwnship
MUNICIPALITY CODE 57003 (CONTINUED. . . )
PR W 1 41 57- 601024 875 07/66 2801 2 FR 147 13 27 30 6/00 COHNING GLASS WORKS 48
697 493151'1 IISNU 0006 I3R~IN ClAY 0026 GREY ClAY 0064
SILT liS NO GRVl 0071 GIIEY CLAY 0120 SILT
CLAY 0129 GREY CLAY 01l,7 FSND GRVl CLAY
0184 (S 0155 26 ) GREY CLAY IISND 0254
GREY CLAY 0260 GRVl CLAY 028lt GREY CLAY
0289 GREY HSNO CLAY 0309 GREY CLAY 0318
GIIEY CLAY HSNO GRYL 0'i22 ROCK 0'i23
PR W 1 41 57- 601083 875 09/65 4816 6 FR 70 31 46 14 211100 DO SNIDER R
8lt5 4931297 TPSL HSNO 0008 CLAY IiSND 00l,7 MSND GRYl
0075 (S 0068 07 )
PR W 1 41 57- 599435 780 08/73 4816 6 FR 214 FlW 200 7 2/00 00 SLESSOR R J
10891 4930275 SAND 0014 CLAY SILT 0107 CLAY 0214 (S
0212 Ol, ) MSNO FSllO 0220
PR W 1 41 57- 600565 825 06/7l, l,816 II Fn 52 FlW 60 4/00 ST SNIDER R
11090 4931100 Fn 85 SANn 00'i3 CLAY 0052 SAND 0065 CLAY SAND
Lynn 0085 HSNO FSUD 0105 1'15110 0235 (S
019'i 05 ) FSNU 0240
PR W 1 41 57- 600900 850 11/78 4816 6 FR 46 24 34 28 18/00 CA SNIDEn DRILLING lTD
15862 49~1650 SAND CHTD 0046 IISNO 0066 (S 0058 08 )
PR W 1 42 57- 600865 850 10/73 1510 4 FR 16 27 35 8 2/00 DO CAI1ERON ANGUS 49
10601 4931735 FR l,4 BRWN TPSl SNDY 0006 GREY GRVl STNS 0012
GIIEY CLAY SINS 0034 GREY SAtlD CLAY 0048
GIIEY ,",SNO CUI 0057 (S 0053 03 ) GREY
SAND CLAY SLTY 0064
PR W 1 43 57- 600785 830 12/64 4616 6 FR 75 28 67 12 4/00 DO ST JOlillS ANGLICAN RE
8'i6 4931807 PRDG 0027 HSNn SILT 00'i6 CLAY GRVl 0049
FSND 0075 HSNn 0060 (S 0077 03 )
PR W 1 43 57- 6005l,O 830 07/70 l,816 6 ~R 90 3'i ct1 13 3/00 ST DO CRAIG II
7434 4932210 HSIID 0056 HSND GRVl 0099 (S 0095 04 )
PR W 1 45 57- 598lt80 775 05/76 120'i :-3 FR 102 FlW 85 6 1/l10 DO IIENSELEIT ERNIE 50
13183 4931600 BRWN ClAY 0007 GREY FSNO 0019 GREY CLAY
SOFT 0086 GIIEY CLAY SAND 0092 GREY CLAY
SILT 0102 GIIEY FSIID SILT 0106 (S 0103
03 )
PR W 1 49 57- 597694 885 10/65 4816 6 FR 212 96 111 12 2l,/00 ST DO OHALLORAN I
847 49~~~66 PRDG OO~O CLAY STtIS 0095 CLAY HSNO 0126
CLAY GRYl OISl, tiSND SILT 0207 CSND 0212
(S 0208 O'i )
PR W 1 50 57- 597328 910 05/63 4816 4 FR 149 132 15"/ 3 8/00 ST DO TlIOHPSON T
842 4933l,79 TPSL 0002 BLUE CLAY 0006 IiSNO STNS 0016
GliNT 0023 HSND LHSN 00'i5 SNDS ROCK 00911
BLUE SJllE 01 02 BR~IN CLAY 1'151m 01l,9 MSNO
0160 (S 0156 04 )
PR W 1 51 57- 598815 820 08/62 2514 6 FR 310 30 175 35 ll!30 CO 00 OUT DEPT OF IlIGIIWAYS 51
843 493l,7l12 .FILL 0004 YLLW HSuo 0015 BRWN CLAY HSND
GRVL 0085 BLUE CLAY 0285 !IrAN 0309 GRVl
0~10
PR W 1 51 57- 597100 930 04/80 (,816 2 154 IR HOSTESS FARI1 DIV
- CONTINUED -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ...- -.,-
Page 47
WATER WELL ...T A SYSTEt1 23 OCT 86 PAGE 156 GROUND WATEH BUllETIN REPORT
UTH CSG KINU wATER STAT PUliP TEST TEST OWNER/LOG/SCHEEN WELL iND.
CONCESSION WELL EASTItIG HEV DIA OF FOUND LVL LVL RATE TII1E WATER DEPTlIS IN FEET TO WIIICII
ETC LOT NO NORTIIING FEET DATE DRILLER INS WATER FEET FEET FEET GP/>I 1111/111'1 USE FOHHATIONS EXTEND
MUNICIPALITY CODE 57003 (CONTINUED... )
16867 4933850 ClAY SAND GRVL 0120 CLAY FSND 0190 CSND
0210 CLAY 0239 I1SND 02'.2 CLAY SAND 0290
SAND SILT 0',10 (S 0330 05 ) CLAY 0425
PR W 1 52 57- 598588 818 06/72 1204 5 FR ',0 6 20 3 5/00 DO LALLA 0 521
8903 4935322 BlmN SAND 0008 GREY ClAY 00'10 GREY SAND
GHVL CLAY 00'14
PR W 1 52 57- 598550 820 05/74 1204 5 FR 7'1 8 52 6 1/00 DO lAllA 0
11132 4935300 PRIm 00'14 GREY SAND GRVl CLAY 0074 BRWN
SAW) 0077 (S 007', 03 )
PR W 1 52 57- 596750 950 05/80 4816 8 158 212 400 48/30 IR HOSTESS FAml DIV
16865 4934350 CLAY SAND 0080 CLAY 0120 FSND CLAY LYRD
0215 FSNU 0318 (S 0266 15 ) ~ISND 0340
FSNO 0350
PR W 1 52 57- 596800 950 04/80 4816 2 158 IR HOSTESS FARli DIV
16866 4934350 CLAY SILT FSNO 0175 FSND CLAY 0275 FSND
0311 (S 0286 05 ) BLOR 0319 FSNO CLAY
0390 />ISNO 0401 FSNO 0',12 CLAY 0'125
PR W 1 53 57- 597969 880 12/72 4816 6 FR 193 87 15 2/00 DO WILLI AI1S tI
9705 4935290 CLAY GJlVl 0031 SAND 0065 GREY CLAY 0074
FStIU ClAY 0115 FSNO SILT 0126 CLAY SAND
0193 />151'10 0206 (S 0200 04 )
PR W 1 54 57- 596517 950 07/53 5510 4 FR 246 125 130 5 1/00 ST DO HARTIN R
844 4934693 TPSL 0002 CLAY GRVL 0034 MSND STNS 0137
CLAY 0139 MSND liP AN STtlS 02't6 GRVL 0256
(S 0246 10 )
PR W 1 54 57- 596550 955 03/75 4616 6 FR 261 168 15 2/10 DO IIUBBAHD TOtl
12258 4934600 SAND GHVl STNS 0045 SAND CI1TD 0231 SAND
0242 SAND CI1TD 0259 HSND 0309 (S 0273
0'1 )
PR W 1 54 57- 596400 950 04/80 4816 2 165 IR IIOSTESS FARM DIV
16868 '1934950 SAND CLAY 0190 CLAY SILT 0260 MSND 0335
(S 0330 05 ) FSND 0378 CSND GRVl 0408
CLAY 0'125
PR W 1 57 57- 595821 915 05/59 5510 4 FR 177 132 136 3 3/00 ST DO JOIINSON II
8'18 4935896 TPSl 0001 BRWN ClAY ~ISND BLDR 0021 CLAY
11SIm oo:n HSND 0102 IIPAN 0107 BLUE CLAY
I1SND 0164 (S 01(,3 14 ) HSND 0177
PR W 1 58 57- 597135 825 05/66 4816 FR 330 48 53 12 48/00 DO HCGRADY E
719 493752'1 l'ls,m 0028 MStlD SILT ClAY 0082 BLUE CLAY
0305 FSNO CLAY 0324 FSND 0332 (S 0328
04 )
PR W 1 58 57- 595638 920 08/65 4816 6 FR 196 1't9 154 9 36/00 DO JOIINSTON W
849 4936556 DlIWN CLAY 0008 ClAY MSND GRVL 004'1 CLAY
MSIW STNS 0086 l'ls,m 01'16 CSNO 0162 1,151'10
0200 (S 0196 0'1 )
PR W 1 58 57- 595600 910 12/77 1222 5 FR 125 125 143 6 1/20 DO COlYN TOM
- 1'1831 4936150 Drum CLAY SOFT 0021 BRWN CLAY SAND
. 0041
BRW'~ SAND CGRD 0167 (S 0164 03 )
PR W 1 59 57- 595330 908 10/73 1204 5 FR 190 140 160 6 1/30 ST DO TIIONPSON n
- CONTINUED -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Page 4B
WATER WELL DATA SYSTEM 23 OCT 86 PAGE ',05 Gf!OUtm WAHR DULLETIN REPORT
UTl1 CSG KItIO WATER STAT PUIIP TEST TEST OWfJER/lOG/SCREEN
CONCESS ION WElL EASTIUG ElEV DIA OF fOUND LVl LVl RATE TII'IE WATER DEPTlIS IN FEET TO WIIICII WELL NO.
ETC LOT NO NORTlIING FEET DATE DRILLER INS WATER FEET fEET fEET /;1'11 IIR/ItN USE fORHATIONS EXlEl1D
Medonte Township
11UNICIPALITY CODE 57007 (COIITI NUED . . . )
CON 14 14 57- 613',40 675 09/68 4713 6 FR 38 20 25 30 1/30 ST DO DURTON W
5544 4948760 TPSl 0002 ClAY STNS 0018 CLAY BlDR 0037
GIIEY HISN 0038
CON 14 15 57- 613118 675 09/73 2614 6 FR 60 15 24 10 3/00 DO nOUCIIElI S
10209 49',9335 PROG 0014 IIPAN 002', lI1SN 0062
CON 14 16 57- 613020 675 02/68 4816 6 FR '13 9 21 5 18/00 DO ROBERTSON II G
5968 49',9500 TPSl 0002 ClAV 11SND 0009 CLAY STNS 0014
GREY UISN 0032 ORWU IIIStI OO'IS
CON 14 20 57- 611300 625 06/71 1204 6 FR 32 12 17 5 1/00 DO IIAYES AU[)REV
8215 4952050 Bf!HN CLAY UlOR 0007 GREV UISN 0032 BRWN
lNSU 0035
CON 14 21 57- 609974 610 08/55 2611 FR 30 11 15 7 /30 ST DO ORTot4 C
1877 4951858 PIIOG 0012 lI1SN 0030
CON 14 22 57- 609700 605 07/75 4715 URV CANERON JAIIES
12278 4952515 BIIWN CLAY OBUN 0009 BlCK GRNT 0150
CON 14 24 57- 609050 600 09/82 4241 6 fR 150 8 150 1 1/30 DO BIGGS C
18191 4953500 BlCK TPSl 0001 BRWN CLAY 0015 BRNN SIILE
0026 BRI'IN GRIn 0090 GREY GI<NT 0160 BRim
GliNT L TCL 0210 DlCK GRNT 0230 BR~1tI GRNT
0270 GHEY GliNT 0330 BlCK GliNT 0370
PR E 1 41 57- 601095 865 09/55 1637 4 fR 46 21 30 7 2/00 DO SIIEIUDAN B
1812 4931620 tlSlm BlDR 0034 LMSN SIILE 0046 CSND 0052
PR E 1 41 57- 601220 890 05/63 4816 " fR 49 31 68 2 4/00 DO :.:m[)ER G
1813 ',931419 FR 69 HED TPSL IISND SIllS 0018 RED HSND lI1SN
0045 BLUE CLAY 00',9 GREV FStlO 0051 GIIEV
SILT 1J.ISN 0069 GIIVl 0080 (S 0075 04 )
PR E 1 41 57- 601190 875 08/64 4816 6 FR 225 47 115 60 ST DO SNIDEII A 53
1814 4931489 HSND GRVL 0089 BLUE ClAY 0094 GREV fStlD
0106 BLUE CLAY 0225 GRVL 0233 (S 0229
10 ) fSND CSND 0250
PR E 1 41 57- 601950 925 05/68 1510 4 60 DO CASTON J A
6047 4931820 /lED I-ISND 0020 liP AN BLDR 0060 (S 0056
0'. )
PR E 1 41 57- 602640 935 11/69 1510 4 fR 65 30 35 10 1/00 ST DO HOI!I!ISSON J
6851 4932280 liEU HSN[) 0040 fSND 0060 CStlD 0065 (S
0061 04 )
PR E 1 42 57- 600980 855 10/58 1419 2 fR 51 27 33 2 10/00 DO JENSON R
1815 4931791 TPSl HSND 0001 MSNO 0028 GRVL 0030 MSND
- 005'.
PR E 1 42 57- 6027B 970 01/67 4816 6 FR 209 92 96 10 16/00 ST DO HLESIIERE J
1816 4932897 TPSl 0002 CLAY STUS 0061 \lPAN STNS 0093
CLAY HSNU 0107 BLUE CLAY 0192 CLAY GRVL
0193 BLUE CLAY 0209 HStlD FSNO 0220 (S
0216 0'. )
PR E 1 42 57- 602800 950 05/79 1',52 5 FII 206 95 130 10 2/00 DO nUNSNORE II
16142 4932800 BlCK TI'SL 0002 BRIm SAND 0029 GREV SAND
GRVl CHTD 0079 GIIEY SILT fG/!D 0107 GREV
CLAY GIIVl 0179 GREY CLAY 0204 GREY CGVl
- CONTINUEO -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-
Page 49
WATER WElL DATA SYSTEI1 23 OCT 86 PAGE '.06 GROUND WATER BULLETIN REPORT
um CSG KINO WATER STAT I' lJIol I' TEST TEST OWNER/lOG/SCREEN WELL NO.
CONCESSION WELL EASTING HEV DIA OF fOUND LVL lVL nATE TUIE WATEn DEPTlIS IN fEET TO ~IIIICII
ETC lOT NO NORTIIING FEET DATE DRILLER INS WATER fEET fEET fEET GPM ItR//>IN USE FORHATIONS EXTEIW
HUNICIPALITY CODE 57007 (CONTINUED. . . )
0206 BIUIN ~ISND 0214 (S 0211 03 ) CLAY
0215
PR E 1 44 57- 600524 830 04/63 '.102 30 FR 20 20 2 DO SIIANAIIAN F 54
1817 4932529 CLAY "'SND 0020 fSND 0032
PR E 1 44 57- 600'.80 825 07/71 4816 6 fn 90 28 33 15 4/00 DO SIIANAIIAN f
8455 4932530 oaWN SAND 0029 SAtlD SILT 0040 FSND 0079
CSND 0095 (S 0089 03 I (S 00'.12 03 )
PR E 1 48 57- 599900 800 04/81 4245 6 fR '.I'. 15 15 50 3/00 CO HARVEY CASSELL uo 55
17373 4934300 BR~IN SAtll) STlIS 0006 GREY QSNO 0089 GREY
ClAY 00'.12 GREY III' AN 0094 BaWN SAt/[) 0094
PR E 1 52 57- 598630 825 07/69 4608 30 fR 5 5 10 1/00 DO SCIIOEFEn E
6477 4935480 OLUE CLAY 0012
PR E 1 52 57- 598630 820 08/72 1204 5 fR 101 6 40 9 1/00 DO SCIIAEFER E
9218 4935510 BRI~N SAND 0014 GREY CLAY 0021 GREY CLAY
SAND GRVL 0101 BIIWN SAND GRVL 0105 (5
0102 03 )
PR E 1 53 57- 598550 825 03/68 4608 30 FR 20 20 DO AUA"'S C 56,
5965 4935640 BR~IN CLAY STNS 0025 GREY CLAY 0042
PR E 1 53 57- 598600 825 10/82 3660 5 fR 262 1'. 120 5 2/00 DO lESPERANCE C n A
18245 4935800 BlCK TPSl 0001 BRWN SAND 0015 GREY SAND
0030 GREY CLAY SAND 0058 GREY CLAY 0122
GREY GHVL SAND CHID 0145 BLUE CLAY 0262
GHEY CGVL CSI/[) 0265 (S 0262 03 )
PH E 1 54 57- 598399 850 05/65 4715 4 FR 40 5 7 2 /30 IN loll lLER M
1818 4935932 />IStm 0012 GREY ClAY 0040 11StID GRVL 0044
(S 0040 04 I
PR E 1 54 57- 598500 815 06/77 4816 6 FR 111 6 71 7 2/00 DO BATTISTON n SONS INC
14389 4936250 SAND 0014 CLAY SAND lYRD 0039 SAND 0047
SAND GIIVL 0075 SAND C"'TD 0106 SAND GIIVL
0122 (S 0107 04 )
PR E 1 54 57- 598500 760 06/77 4715 6 fR 107 18 48 6 99/59 DO ~tClAUGIILIN L
14'.82 4935960 BRlItI CLAY SAND BlDR 0175
PR E 1 55 57- 598650 800 05/68 '1608 30 fR 10 10 DO FOlJlUH Ell J
5964 4937050 />151m 0015
PR E 1 56 57- 599200 785 08/78 4816 2 fR 51 7 20 1/00 PS HIP OF NEDONTE
15't57 4937500 SAUD 0003 CLAY 0030 CLAY FSND 0051 (S
0048 11 ) NSND 0063 HSlm FSND 0078
PR E 1 50 57- 599150 785 08/78 4816 2 FH 16 1 PS TI~P OF MEDDNTE
15458 4937600 SAIID 000'. CLAY 0016 HSND 0033 (S 0020
05 I
PR E 1 56 57- 599300 775 08/79 1'152 6 FR 55 6 'to 100 30/00 PS MU POLICE IIILlSOAlE
16244 4937550 BRWII TP5L SAUl) 0002 GREY CLAY 0018 BRWN
SAIID 0023 GIIEY SAND CHID 0052 OII~IN NSND
0085 (S 0064 19 ) GHEY ClAY 0085
PR E 1 56 57- 599550 775 09/79 3135 5 FR '12 9 13 15 1/00 00 tlCKEE 0
16631 4%7900 PIInG 0025 BHWN SAND 0028 GREY CLAY SAND
00'12 omm SAlin 0051 (S 00'.8 03 )
PR E 1 57 57- 597817 823 06/58 1637 4 FR 202 30 70 40 4/00 DO SCOTT R G
1819 4937452 TPSL />151m 0046 Q5tID 0065 "PAN STNS 0202
- - - - - - - - -- - - -
- - - - - - -
Page 50
WATER WELL DATA SVSTHI B OCT 86 PAGE '109 GROUND WATER BULLETIN REPORT
um CSG KIND WATER STAT PUHP TEST TEST O~INER/LOG/SCREEN
CONCESSION WELL EASTING ELEV DIA OF FOUND LVL LVL RATE TIHE WATER DEPTIIS IN fEET TO WIIlCII WELL NO.
ETC lOT NO NORT/IlNG FEET DATE PRILlER INS WATER fEET fEET fEET GPH Im/NN USE fORI1ATIONS EXTEND
MUNICIPALITY CODE 57007 (CONTINUED. . . )
10228 49(13589 ORWN CLAY SAND 0003 GREY CLAY SAND GRVL
0021 onWN SAND GnVL 0038 BlUm SAND 0051
IS 00118 03 )
PR E 1 75 57- 594549 930 08/13 2514 6 fR 421 170 200 25 4/30 DO DUFFI E J
10313 4944207 OLCK TPSl 0001 BRwN SAND BLDR 0024 GREY
SAND 0231 DLUE CLAY fSND 0265 OLUE CLAY
0421 GREV 11SND CLAV 04'.9 IS 0421 06 )
(S 0429 20 )
PR E 1 75 57- 593566 825 06/13 4616 6 fR 59 20 40 10 l/OO DO TIIOI-IPSON J
1093~ 494~547 SAND GRVl 00~6 SAND SILT 0059 MSND 0067
(S 0059 04 )
PR E 1 75 57- 593500 625 11/74 3602 4 fR 46 24 41 5 DO GREtHER RICIIARD
11714 4943500 BRWtI TPSL 0001 ~IIIIT CLAY 0009 ORWN CLAY
SAND 0036 DnWN CLAY SNDS IIPAN 0048 ORWN
SAND l'mnG 0053 (S 0050 03 )
PR E 1 75 57- 593500 825 09/75 1204 5 fR 30 30 36 6 1/00 DO BALL IIAIWLD
12531 4943500 IHMtI CLAY STtIS 0014 GREY SAND 0050 IS
00'16 03 )
PR E 1 75 57- 594700 940 10/75 2514 6 fR 367 161 377 10 2/00 DO HCINTOSII J
13134 4944350 BRWtI SAIID 0110 ORWN SAND CLAY 0117 ORWN
SAND 0144 GREY CLAY SILT SAND 0286 GREY
CLAY 0382 GREY SILT CStlD liARD 0385 GREY
SAIID CHTD 0392 (S 0387 05 ) GnEY SILT
SANn 0400
PR E 1 75 57- 593500 820 09/77 3135 5 FR 50 50 55 10 1/00 DO IIODSON JOliN
14995 4943550 BLCK TPSL 0001 B Rwtl CLAY SAND STNS 0016
OIlWU SAND OilY 0050 OIlWN SAUD 0066 IS
0065 03 )
PR E 1 75 57- 594900 925 06/62 3602 6 fR 395 140 150 15 10/00 DO SEARL A
18080 4944550 BHWN TI)Sl 0001 ORWN SAND CLAY 0050 GREY
CLAY SOFT 0098 GnEV CLAY SILT 0160 GnEY
CLAY SilOS 0589 GnEY CLAY SAND 0400 (S
0397 07 ) OIlWN SAND CLN WBRG 0412
PR E 2. 41 57- 603080 1035 12/70 1510 4 fR 80 55 65 6 1/00 ST DO ELSNER C"ARLIE 57!
7752 4932560 HE[) TPSL "'SHO 0012 "'SilO STNS 0080 11SND
0090 IS 0080 06 )
PR E 2 42. 57- 602759 970 12/67 4816 6 FR 171 103 145 10 20/00 DO BCNUTT J 58!
1831 4933077 PROG 0061 "PAtI STNS 00'17 BLUE CLAY 0134
- "PAN 0169 CLAY 0207 NSNO CLAY GRVL 0212
IIPAN 0269 fSNO CSUI} 02l', (S 0271 03 )
PR E 2 56 57- 599650 775 09/79 4608 30 FR 12 12 DO TlIUIILOW J
16553 4937900 SAND 0012 CLAY 0024
PR E 2 58 57- 599213 750 06/74 3660 5 FR 75 ftW 20 6 2/00 DO counTNEV G
11103 4938603 Bf!~IN SAND CLAY oon BLUE CLAY 0075 GREY
SAIIIJ Gf!VL CLAY 0080 (s 0077 03 ) Gf!EY
CLAV OOIH
_ PR E 2 59 57- 599080 775 05170 4608 30 fR 10 12 18 1/15 DO CASEY TIIO"'AS
7lt>3 4938800 FR 22 ORWN CLAY "'SND 0010 GREY NstlD CLAY 002l
PR E 2 59 57- 599084 775 02/74 4715 4 SA 70 1 60 2 2/30 DO COUHTtkY G J
- CONTINUED -
- - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - -
Page 51
WATER WELL ..TA 5Y5TEI" 23 OCT 86 PAGE 382 GROUtlO ~IATER BULLETIN REPORT
UTH C~G KItlD WATER STAT PUIIP TEST TEST OWNER/LOG/SCREEN WELL, m.
CONCESSION WELL EASTING HEV IHA Of fOUNU lVl lVL RATE TIt'IE WATER DErTlIS IN fEET TO WIIICII
HC lOT NO NORTlIHIG FEET DATE DRILLER INS WATEn FEET FEET fEET GPI1 IIII/IIN USE fOnHATIONS EXTEND !
MUtlICIPALITY CODE 57006 (CONTI NUED. . . )
CON 2 17 57- 605800 6(10 08/78 4616 6 FR 105 7 10 2/00 DO ZAPPE II
15579 4963300 SAUD 0019 RED GRNT DKCl 0107
CON 3 4 57- 611400 600 09/76 4616 6 fR 20 2 1/00 DO AHCIIER C
13878 4957(,00 TI It 0003 RED GliNT 0122
CON 3 (I 57- 611800 600 08/78 2652 6 fit 115 24 1/00 DO NOBLE It
15542 4957600 BII~II~ DB ON 0006 BLCK GliNT 0245
CON 3 12 57- 609069 600 07/73 4816 7 FR 180 16 20 1/00 DO lOURICS G
100M 4962024 TPSL 0003 GRNT 0185
CON 3 14 57- 607900 640 07/76 2614 6 fR 79 20 82 3 2/00 DO BETTS E
14404 4962700 om'lN TI'Sl 0004 GRNT ROCK 0082
CON 4 7 57- 612488 660 07/72 4715 6 FR 45 10 40 5 3/00 DO IHCK II
9205 4960363 CLAY SAND GRVL 0008 GREY UISN 0011 BLCK
GliNT 0067
CON 5 6 57- 612470 710 09/71 4616 6 FR 91 6 DO PHESSNAJ L L
6743 4960950 IPSl 0001 RED GRNT 0125
CON 7 21 57- 610300 700 09/70 4816 6 FR 35 1 15 1/00 DO PHI [SHIAN J G
7f:. 4 9 (,969600 fR 77 CLAY 0003 RED GRNT 0080
CON 7 21 57- 610460 685 05/7(1 4816 6 FR 200 8 70 1/00 DO !lARRIS 0
11068 4969393 TPSl 0001 GRNT 0245
CON 7 22 51- 610201 690 05/62 2402 6 fR 25 (/ 50 15 2/00 CO DO DEPT Of L AND F
1811 4969620 fn 80 IPSl 0001 BLUE CLAY 0012 GREY GRNT 0096
MUNICIPALITY CODir[1001
~onte Towns p
CON 2 50 51- 601650 950 04/76 4816 6 fR 422 67 285 20 2/00 CO 01 SIIER- F ARRAtlD lTD
13226 493(,140 SAtlD GRVL SINS 0059 CLAY FStlD 0116 FSND
SILT 0132 CLAY SILT 0312 CLAY GRVL 0343
SAtlD SILT Olj02 (S 0(100 16 ) SAND GRVl
UISII 0(121 GREY lHStl 0(,65
CON 3 7 57- 602861 1025 05/58 5510 4 DRY IHCIIAIWSON E
1833 (,937313 ClAY TPSl 0002 flSHD GRVl STHS 0039 MSND
CLAY III'AII 0183 liP AN 0218
CON 3 7 57- 602871 1025 11/59 1637 6 FR 256 220 225 10 12/00 DO RICIIARDSOtl E 60\
1834 4937252 BRNN CLAY 0012 BlDR oo:n GRVl 0013 nflWN
CLAY 0152 QSNO 0112 CLAY lIS 1m 0192 IIPAN
0210 OLUE CLAY 0232 IIPAN BlDR 0263 GRVl
0265
CON 3 8 51- 601400 955 06/53 5510 4 fR 92 67 69 4 1/00 DO HACOONAtO M 61
1835 4936964 TPSl 0002 "'SlID GRVl SINS 0062 flSND CLAY
DOn HStlO 0102 (S Don 10 )
CON 3 8 51- 601420 975 11/69 3203 5 FR 81 60 73 6 1/00 ST DO IIILl H
6861 4937100 pnUG 0030 HSIID 0049 CLAY 0081 MSND 0087
(S 008(1 03 ) ClAY 0088
CON 3 6 57- 601500 1000 06/79 "1816 6 FR 394 180 5 9/00 DO SI1JTII R
16396 4936700 SAtlD GnVl 0012 CLAY GRVl 0042 SAND GRVl
0058 CLAY SAND lyrm 0095 I1SIIO ClAY 0135
- SILT CLAY 039(, 115110 OttOl (S 0395 04 )
..
SILT CLAY 0449 SAND CLAY CHTD 0406 lllSH
0500
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - -
Page 52
WATER WElL DATA SYSTEH 23 OCT 06 PAGE 303 GnOUND WATER BULLETIN REPORT
Unt C$G KIND WATEn STAT 1'111011' TEST TEST OWNER/LOG/SCREEN WELL NO.
CONCESSION WELL EASTING HEV DIA OF fOUNt) LVl LVL HATE TII'IE WATEI~ DEPTlIS IN FEET TO WIIICU
ETC lOT NO NORTIIIUG FEET DATE mULLER INS HATER FEET FEET FEET GI'I1 IIn/I'IN USE FOIUIATlOt/$ EXTEND
HUNICIPALITY CODE 57007 (CONTINUED...)
CON 3 10 57- 6011,19 985 04/6lt 4816 '. FR 150 63 115 15 5/00 DO ~~A Y W
1836 ',938816 TPSL CLAY 0008 MSND GRVL 0096 GREY FSND
0148 GHVL 0155 (5 0151 0', )
CON 3 10 57- 601695 1015 08/66 4/n6 6 FR 150 122 142 10 5/00 ST DO BELANGER E 62:
1637 4938615 1PSL !lPAN 0016 HSND GRVL CLAY 0126 GRVL
0155 (5 0149 0(, )
CON 3 10 57- 601200 979 11/77 4816 6 FR 131 88 119 10 1/00 DO IHIPLE10N TON
14849 4938650 BRI.ltl CLAY 0005 SAND 0008 SAND ClAY LYRO
0092 CLAY 0097 FSND 0179 (S 0128 03 )
GREY CLAY DNSE 0197
CON 3 10 57- 601800 1005 05/78 3203 6 fR 61 16 58 20 2/00 DO onOWN RON
15209 4938600 BR~It~ CLAY SAND SHIS 0028 BRWN SAND 0050
BR~IN SAND CLAY 0061 BRim SAND 0073 (S
0063 09 )
COIl 3 11 57- 601400 990 10/80 3660 5 fR 102 90 130 3 1/00 DO G!lENJER F
17069 4938950 BHlIN 1PSL 0001 BRWN SAND 0008 GREY CLAY
0031 BRWN SAND GRVL Dny 0102 Bn~1N SAND
~IORG 0135 ($ 0130 03 )
CON 3 11 57- 601300 975 11/80 2514 6 fR HO 77 105 20 2/20 DO $ HIPSON 0
17113 4938900 BRWN SANU sms 0008 BRWN CLAY BLDR liARD
0068 BIIHN GRVl CLAY STNS 0112 (S 0110
05 I BnWN GIWl SAND ClAY 0120 BRI'UI CLAY
$INS 0150 GREY CLAY 0225
CON 3 14 57- 59qB4 825 09/b7 2514 6 FR 54 FlW 45 16 2/30 5T DO PHIDIIAfoI II
1838 4940441 FII 57 FIll 0001 FSUD 0012 BLUE CLAY 004', GREY
FSNU CLAY 0054 GRVl foISlm 0057
CON 3 15 57- 5'.18'.153 905 07/66 2514 6 fR 39 18 "b " 2/30 ST DO NOTII .J
1839 4940977 TPSl 0001 NSlm 0010 BIIWN CLAY 0030 HSUO
0050 (S 0046 03 ) FSNU 0052
CON 3 15 57- 599410 780 11176 2514 6 FR 66 25 49 10 1/15 DO IIOTII J
14025 4941290 BnWIJ SANU 0006 GREY CLAY SOfT 0022 BRWN
SAUU 0053 YLLW SILT CLAY SAND 0066 YLlW
CSIID OOb'} (S 0066 03 )
CON 3 17 57- 598300 935 05170 1204 5 fR 90 78 86 6 1/15 S1 SPEAR!U C F
7185 4941900 BIIWN IISlm CLAY BLUR 0051 BII~IN NSND 0058
onwtI IISIID CLAY 0070 BRWN foISlm 0105 IS
0102 03 )
CON :5 19 57- 598877 925 07165 2514 b FR 397 136 340 2 60/00 S1 DO EU\~ARDS F
1840 4943615 PRUG 0053 BLUE CLAY BLDR 0059 CSIID SILT
CLAY 0098 BLUE CLAY 0313 CLAY "ISNO 0332
CLAY GRVL 037', UlSN SIILE SILT 0387 WIiIT
UIStI 0400
CON 3 21 57- 597080 940 08/74 4816 6 450 151 300 30 4/00 UO ALEXANDER C-VALlANT
11863 4943900 CLAY SILT SAND 0387 SILT 0411 GREY CLAY
0(146 CSIII) 0452 (S 0446 04 ) UISN O',bO
CON 4 1 57- 605490 1050 10/50 2801 uny !lCAf
1841 4933971 NSUD OOlli IiSNU BLUR 0037 NSUU 0075 BLUE
CLAY fSNU GI!VL 0234 FSlm GRVl 0267 !ISUU
GHVL CLAY 0276
- - - - - - - - .-
., - - - - - - - - -
Page 53
WATER WElL DATA SYSTEM 23 OCT 66 PAGE 364 GROUND WATER DULLETIN REPORT
UTM CSG KIND WATER STAT PUHP TEST TEST OI'IMER/LOG/SCREEN
CONCESSION WELL EASTING HEV OIl. Of fOUND LVL LVI. RATE TIHE WATER DEPTIIS IN fEET TO WlnCII WELL NO.
ETC LOT tlO tlORTlIIHG FEET DATE DRILLER INS WATER FEET FEET fEET GPI1 I In/I-IN USE FOfU1ATIOUS EXTEND
MUNICIPALITY CODE 57007 (CONTINUED... )
CON 4 2 57- 605800 1050 10/71 4816 9 DRY IIORSESIIOE VALLEY L TO
8'166 4935170 GRVL 0015 CLAY SAMn 00li6 SAND CLAY 0055
GREY CLAY 0066 SAND CLAY 0090 GRVL SAND
0128 GnVL 0141 FSIID 0150 GREY CLAY 0189
CLAY GRVL 0208 SANn 02liS
CON 4 11 57- 601811 995 10/61 1637 6. fn 156 98 103 12 4/00 ST DO POTTAGE K 63
1M2 4939432 TPSL OOOli HSND 0030 BLDR 0038 tiS I III 0060
BlDn 0072 HSIIO 0093 HStln CLAY 0104 QSND
0153 IIPAII 0156 GRVL STNS 0158
CON 4 11 57- 602350 1055 10/75 1204 5 FR 192 ItIO 160 6 1/00 DO LESPERANCE IIDI'IER
12616 4939535 GREY CLAY SAND 0076 GREY SAND GRYL CLAY
0105 BR"N SAIID GnYl 0196 (S 0193 03 )
CON 4 11 57- 602450 1050 10/80 3660 5 fR 168 133 148 15 1/00 DO HI 51 LOUIS ESTATES
17016 4939650 DRWN SAND GRYL 0140 DRI'IN SAND GRY.L BLDR
0160 BRWN GRYL DRTY 0168 YLLW FSND tlStlll
0172 IS 0169 03 )
CON 4 11 57- 602900 1075 10/80 3660 4 fR 170 TELLINO R
17070 4939850 DRlm SAND 0004 GREY CLAY GRVL 0160 BRWN
SAND 0175
CON 4 11 57- 602350 1050 06/81 3660 5 fR 190 83 150 6 1/00 DO SIIAUAIIAII B
17478 4939750 BHWI~ SAND 0012 DRWN CLAY 0080 GREY CLAY
BlDR GRVL 0120 GREY CLAY 0180 GREY SILT
CLAY 0190 GREY HSUD 0195 (S 0192 03 )
CON 4 13 57- 602115 1035 06/72 1204 5 FR 173 133 155 5 2/00 ST DO IH HER K
8901 4941027 Blum C lA Y SAND BLDR 0022 GREY SAND CLAY
GRVl 0052 BRIm SAIIO GRYl 0057 GREY CLAY
SAtin GRYL 0076 GREY CLAY 0173 BRWtl SAND
GRVl 0176 (S 0173 03 )
CON 4 14 57- 601610 935 06/72 2514 6 fR 1'16 100 120 15 2/00 SI FEIIIIIS D
8918 49't1689 BLCK IPSL 0002 RED SAIID 0004 !3RWN CLAY
0012 GREY CLAY SAND GRVL 0049 GREY CLAY
Bum 0075 GREY CLAY GRVL 0087 GREY CLAY
SAND BLDR 0117 GREY CLAY SAND GRVL 0146
r.RVl 0147
CON 4 14 57- 601800 990 04/78 1222 :; FR 32 32 37 6 1/15 DO KING TONY
15195 4941550 Bmlll IPSL 0002 GREY SAIID 0023 GREY SAND
0060 IS 0057 03 )
CON 4 15 57- 601400 875 07/69 2514 6 Ff! 49 32 47 10 2/30 DO WI LSOl~ T
7706 49't2210 TPSL 0002 BRIm CLAY BLDR 0011 HSIID GRYL
BLDR 0049 GRVL 0051
CON 4 15 57- 600lil0 755 12/72 2li02 7 FR 105 18 60 10 30/00 PS COfU/ECTIONAl CEIITnE
9846 4941857 CLAY 0080 SAND 0100 (S 0095 05 ) GRYL
0110
CON 4 15 57- 600'iOO 750 03/81 2li02 6 fR 262 15 20 12 15/00 ST COnRECTIONAl CTR
17981 49'11800 SAIID 0022 CLAY 0078 !tPAN 0085 GRYL liP AN
0102 CLAY 0210 IIPAII 0262 GRVL 0271 (S
- 0262 08 ) GRYL CLAY 0272
.
CON 4 18 57- 599315 920 12/74 120't 6 FR 137 110 131 5 4/00 ST DO NAI!TIU A G
- CorHINUED -
.. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ -
Page 54
WATER WEll DATA SYSTEI1 23 OCT 66 PAGE 365 GROUND WATER BULLETIN REPDRT
UTl1 CSG KIND WATER STAT PUIIP TEST TEST OWNER/lOG/SCREEN
CDNCESSIDN WEll EASTING ElEV DIA OF FoUtm LVI. lVl nATE nt.IE WATEn DEPTIIS IN fEET TO HIIICII WELL NO.
ETC lDT NO NORTlIING fEET DATE DnIlLER INS WATER fEET fEET fEET GPI1 IIn/NN USE fORNATIONS EXIEND
MUNICIPALITY CODE 5713137 (CDNTINUED... )
11978 49431513 ORWN SAND CLAY GRVl 0065 ORl'IN SAND CLAY
0106 BlUm SILT SAND OU7 BnWN SAND GRVl
01',0 (S 13137 133 I
CDN 4 16 57- 59921313 91313 12/81 42'15 6 fR 123 92 103 16 1/30 DD ilEA TlIEnItlGTON W
17754 49433513 BR~IN IPSl 0001 ORWN CLAY GRVl 00',0 OR\'IN
SAND Gltvl 13056 BRI'It~ SAIlD 01365 Bmlll SAND
GUVl 01393 BIU'/N SAtm ClAY 0100 BR~IN SAND
13123 (S 0121 133 I
CDN 4 23 57- 597710 9513 05/69 3203 5 fR 713 175 2213 4 2/00 ST 013 IWBINSDtI G
6384 4945750 IPSl 131302 ClAY MSND SINS 0030 CLAY MSND
BlDR 1313613 CLAY STNS 131370 BLUE CLAY 0122
CLAY SILT 0123 SILT ClAY 0132 fSND t1SND
01',5 (S 0123 03 I
CON 4 24 57- 598350 975 10/68 251'1 6 fR 234 137 225 10 3/00 DO fAlLISS W
5668 49'16740 OIMII ClAY 01318 OLUE CLAY tlSND 0067 DRWN
I'ISIID SILT STNS 0142 BLUE CLAY 0234 YlLW
NSND 0239 (S 13236 133 I
CDN 4 24 57- 598420 975 113/72 1204 5 fR 213 160 167 7 1/00 DO EUWARUS N
9254 4946750 Bnl'iN SAND ClAY OLDR 00'15 GREY CLAY SAND
13072 OI!l~N GUVL SAND 0074 GREY CLAY SAND
OLDR 13133 GREY CLAY 13213 ORWN SAND GRVl
13217 (S 13214 133 I
CDN 5 1 57- 6136681 1265 137167 4816 8 fR 215 2136 315 2 24/00 DO IHlLIA"'S U 64'
1843 493'1746 olum CLAY MSND 13024 GRVl 01337 CSND 13078
Blum CLAY 0096 GRVl 13105 IIPAN 0156 US/In
GRVL CLAY 13227 (S 13214 09 I GREY CLAY
13377 UStln CLAY SIILE 0632 UlSN 0635
CON 5 1 57- 6072130 1175 132/69 4816 ALEXANUEn C
62131 49353013 UStln 008 7 OR~1N CLAY 0108 NStlD GRVl 0188
GREY CLAY 0305
CON 5 1 57- 61368213 12130 136/69 '1816 6 fR 31'1 236 248 12 8/00 DO ALEXAtIDEI~ C
66713 4935320 "'SliD SINS 131378 GREY CLAY 13222 GREY SILT
ClAY 13254 GREY ClAY 13256 FSND 03139 NStlO
GRVl 0316 (S 0314 134 I
CON 5 9 57- 6133650 940 09/7't 251'1 6 fR 159 122 139 10 1/00 013 BELL f 65!
11674 4936665 If'SL nKCL 0001 ORWtl CLAY 0005 ORWN SAND
GHVL OLOH oo:n GHEY CLAY 00'1'1 YllW SAND
GUVL 0159 YllW SAND 0169 (S 0166 03 I
- CON 5 113 57- 6133057 1100 10/63 2514 6 FR 230 205 225 16 2/00 00 LAHLOH J 66
1844 4939781 TpSL 0001 BRHN CLAY OLDR 0035 BRWN CLAY
SINS 0165 CSND 0190 BIII.uI CLAY SINS 13228
GIIVL 0230
CON 5 113 57- 603507 10413 0(1/6'1 2514 6 fR 176 1'19 175 25 /30 ST DO fHAWLEY N J
18ft7 4939093 PIInG 01354 BLUE CLAY 0066 USt/[) GRVl 0173
CSt/[) 0179 (S on6 03 )
CON 5 113 57- 6134172 975 06/74 '1616 6 fR 203 155 170 10 2/013 DO SIOnEY R
111364 '1940372 PIWG 0032 SAND GRVL 0161 GREY CLAY 0172
SAt/[) GIIVl 0203 (S 0200 03 I usrll) 0207
CON 5 10 57- 603669 11130 10/74 120'1 6 FR 330 293 305 6 2/00 DO IIILL II
- CmlTIrlUED -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -r--
Page 55
WATER WELL DATA SYSTEM 23 OCT 86 PAGE 386 GROUND ~IA TER OULLETIN REPORT
UTM CSG KIND WATER STAT PUMP TEST TEST OI'INER/LOG/SCREEN
CONCESSION WELL EASTING ELEV DIA OF FDUlm LVL LVL RATE TII'IE WATER DEPTIIS IN FEET TO ~IIIICII WELLi NO.
ETC LOT NO NORT/IING FEET DATE DRILLER INS WATER FEET FEET FEET GPM IIR/MN USE FORMATIONS EXTEND 1
i
I
I
I
I
MUNICIPALITY CODE 57007 (CONTINUED... )
11509 i9'.0225 OR~IN SAND 0078 ORWN SAND CLAY 0108 ORI'IN
SAND GnVL 02',7 GnEY SAND CLAY 0330 Onl'.'N
SAND 0335 (S 0331 04 I
CON 5 10 57- 604100 1020 0717'1 4816 6 FR 235 185 191 12 2/40 DO STOnEY R W
11845 4940485 SAND GRVL CLAY 0048 SAND GnVl 0093 MSND
0101 FSIW CLAY 0202 SANI) GRVl 0236 (S
0229 03 I
CON 5 10 57- 603100 1100 06/75 1204 5 FR 200 190 205 5 2/00 DO ALLEN OIll
12306 4939825 OHliN SAlm CLAY 0063 ORWN SAND GRVL 0221
(S 0218 03 )
CON 5 10 57- 604140 985 07/75 4715 4 FR 230 217 218 5 2/00 DO R W STOREY LTn
12312 4940415 BlutN SAIII) BLDR DRY 0121 GREY CLAY SILT
02:.0 omlll SANn O,U.O (S 0237 03 I
CON 5 10 57- 603650 1007 09/77 4816 6 FR 350 295 10 3/00 DO STEPIIENSON R
14714 49',0150 GnVL SAIII) 0018 FSIID 00'12 CLAY SAND 0081
FGVL 0094 SAND CLAY 011', CLAY DIISE 0159
FGVL 0170 11SIm 0207 SANI) GnVL CLAY 0334
IiSIII) 0351 (S 0346 0'. I FSIID 0365
Cotl 5 10 57- 604300 925 09/81 4816 6 105 105 25 2/00 DO WIIIGIIT A
17860 4940200 SAIID 0018 CLAY 00',8 FSND 0174 (S 0156
0'. I CLAY 0200
CON 5 10 57- 604300 925 08/82 4816 6 105 50 DO WIHGIIl A
18192 4940150 SANI) DWR 0025 CLAY STNS 0055 FSND SILT
00')'. NSNn CSIID 0160 (S 01'.9 05 ) CSIID
DIHY 0175
CON 5 11 57- 603020 1075 03/70 1204 5 192 172 185 4 3/30 DO PIIILIP KING
7188 4939870 GHEY MStlD CLAY DLDR 00',5 DRWN MSND CRVL
0054 DIU/II FSNI) 0080 on~IN 115110 GHVL 0084
GIIEY fSND CLAY 0192 MStlO GnVL 0202 (S
0199 03 )
CON 5 11 57- 602760 1000 08/71 251', 6 FR 151 82 1't9 6 1/30 ST DO STEPIIENSON G
8277 4940250 TPSL 0002 RED MSND BLDR 0017 YLLW I1SND
DLD!! 0031 ORI'iN CLAY GRVL BLDR 0043 YLLW
I1SIIO CLAY GnVL 0049 YLLW FSND GnVL DLDR
0108 YLLI~ FSND 0151 YLLW NSND 0154 (S
0151 03 )
CON 5 11 57- 604040 1050 02/76 1204 5 FR 255 225 232 no BUTT WI1
12857 4940550 BHWI SAND CLAY 0030 Bm~N SAND eRVL HARD
OUO GHEY SAtm CLAY BLDf~ 0215 ORWN SAUD
GHVL CHTD 0255 OR~jll SAIIO GRVL 0259 (S
0256 03 I
CON 5 11 57- 603000 1100 07/80 4816 6 FR 2'15 182 4 2/00 DO ROSS J
17177 4939850 SANn GRVL CLAY 0200 FeVL SAND 0230 FSND
0245 CSIID 0260 (S 0254 0'. )
CON 5 12 57- 60343& 1075 11/61 1637 6 DRY CAlIPHELL 0
1845 49'.1281 OIUII~ CLAY I<ISIID STNS 0016 HSIID CSIID 0270
-: CON 5 12 57- 60361'1 1115 05/73 3203 5 FR 206 206 210 8 1/30 DO KH1ENT II
9934 4941064 BRW~ TPSL 0001 BRNN SAIID CLAY 0035 BRIm
SAND 0206 OH~lN SAND 0236 (S 0235 03 I
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Page 56
WATER WELL DATA gygTEM 23 OCT 86 PAGE 388 GROUND WATER BULLETIN REPORT
UTM CSG KIND WATER STAT PUI.IP TEST TEST OWNER/LOG/gCREEN
CONCESSION WElL EAgTING ElEV DIA OF FOUIID LVL LVL RATE TUIE WATER DEPTIIS IN fEET TO WIIICII WELL NO.
ETC LOT NO NORIIIUIG fEET DATE DRILLER INS WATER fEET FEET fEET GPH Im/NN UgE fORMATIONS EXTEND
MUNICIPALITY CODE 57007 I CONTINUED. . . )
GRVL L YRD 0119 GREY CLAY 0192 BR~1tI SAUD
0228 IS 0225 03 )
CON 5 21 57- 600300 955 05/77 1204 5 FR 178 162 180 6 1/30 DO STACEY RANDY
14462 49't5650 Bnwu SAND CLAY OO'tO BnWN SAND GnVL BLOR
0101, BnWN SAND 0167 BIIWN SArlO GRVL 0178
BR~IN SAND 0203 IS 0200 03 )
CON 5 24 57- 599860 885 01/72 4816 6 FR 200 103 117 12 1/00 ST DO ED~IARI)S 0
8733 4947380 SAIID GRVL 0115 GREY CLAY SHIS 018lt FSND
GI(vL 0204 IS 0196 04 ) IS 0200 04 )
CON 5 24 57- 598650 970 11172 1204 5 FR 227 109 175 6 1/15 ST DO EDWARDS L
9480 49'16750 BHlIN CLAY SAtlD BLDR 003'1 BlUm SAtlD GRVL
0123 GREY CLAY SAUD 0178 GREY CLAY GRVL
STIIS 0227 GREY SAND GRVL 0231 IS 0228
03 )
CON 5 24 57- 598920 975 06173 1204 6 FR 228 110 120 12 1/30 DO EOIiARDS 0
9845 4947133 BRWN CLAY SAND 0007 BR~ltl CLAY SAND GRVL
002'1 GREY CLAY SAUD 0048 BIUIN SAND GRVL
0128 GREY CLAY 0212 BHWN SAND CLAY 0228
BHI~N SAND GnVL 0237 IS 0231 06 )
CON 5 24 57- 598885 950 11/73 1204 5 FR 300 157 166 7 3/00 DO EOIiARDS R
10593 49lj6lt67 OHl~N CLAY SAND GRVL 0019 GREY CLAY SAND
0032 ORWN SAND GRVL 0118 OHWU SAND SILT
0161 GnEY CLAY 0300 IS 0299 03 ) OHlIN
SAND 0302
COU 6 1 57- 608590 1045 01/67 3203 5 FR 97 97 115 2 2/00 DO 1I0RTlIE S 67:
18'18 4935907 fR 125 ('IWG 0097 YLLW FSIID 0117 FSND CSIID 0125
IS 0122 03 ) FSND 0126
CON 6 1 57- 608124 970 06/67 4816 6 FR 172 87 89 13 24/00 DO IH LLI MIS U 68
1849 4936079 I.ISII() SHIS 0018 BRWN CLAY 0032 GREY CLAY
sms 0098 CLAY SILT STNS 0166 CSIID 0172
GRVL 0180 IS 0175 03 )
CON 6 1 57- 608055 975 06174 4816 6 fR 230 142 165 20 2/00 DO WI LLI AHS D
11092 4936031 SANI) CLAY 0031 CLAY GRVL 0093 SAND 0128
CLAY gAUD 0208 tlS11() 0238 IS 0231 03 )
CON 6 3 57- 606833 1075 12172 '1816 6 FR 290 187 250 20 2/00 DO SEllERS E A
9708 4936628 CLAY SAND 0016 SAIID GRVL 0136 GI1EY CLAY 69i
0157 GIlVL 0161 Gf!EY CLAY 0198 NsrlD 0290
(S 0283 0'1 )
- COU 6 3 57- 606800 1012 02/76 4713 6 FR 238 198 220 15 2/30 DO SElLEIlS E tl
15223 4936300 BliNN SAtlD CLAY LYRO 0103 ORWN GRVL SAND
0115 OHwrl CLAY SAIID L.YRD 0138 OLUE CLAY
OIlt5 Bf!~IN SANO 023't Olllltl SAIID STIIS 0238 ,
(S 023't 0'1 ) ,
CON 6 8 57- 606160 750 05/71 '1816 6 fR 12't 23 5lt 9 2/00 DO L.EE R 701
7963 't939600 NSIID CL.AY 0088 NSND SILT 0123 tlSND GnVL i
0127 (S 012lt 03 )
-: CON 6 11 57- 603960 1150 05/69 1,816 6 FR 285 UO NOlI AN A
6281 '19',0900 NSI/I) GRVL OH6 GHEY CLAY 0196 FSND 0218
NSIII) 0286 IISIIO GHVL 0290 (S 0286 Olt )
~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Page 57
WATER WElL DATA SYSTEl1 23 OCT 86 PAGE 389 GROUND WATEI! BULLETIN REPORT
UTl1 CSG KJlID WATE(~ STAT PUNP TEST TEST OWNER/LOG/SCREEN
CO"lCESSION WELL EASTING ELEV 01.\ Of fO~IND LVL LVL RATE TH1E WATEI! DEPTlIS IN fEET TO I'/IIICII WELL NO.
ETC LOT NO NORTIIING fEET DATE DRILLER INS WATER fEET fEET flU GP'" Im/NN USE fOlU1ATIONS EXTEND
MUNICIPALITY CODE 57007 (CotHINIJED... )
CON 6 11 57- 605000 1025 04/76 4816 6 fR 180 122 127 35 24/00 MU TAN-AN PROPERTIES IT
13234 49(.1500 SAND GRVL 0021 CGVL 0037 GRVL CLAY 0073
SILT 0087 fSND CLAY fGVL 0165 "'Still CSIID
0185 (S 0167 08 ) "'SND FSND 0193 GRVL
CLAY 0200 GRVL CLAY 0205 SAUD CIHD 0228
CON 6 15 57- 603550 1025 07/70 4816 6 fR 125 80 110 8 2/00 DO NIELSEN P
7(133 4943760 TPSL 11SND STNS 0014 "'SND SILT 0101 CLAY
~ISND 0118 CSND 0125 (S 0121 04 ) CLAY
0126
CON 6 15 57- 602650 1030 09/82 4241 6 fR 121 121 131 20 3/00 DO III LLER N
18165 4943050 BLCK TPSL 0001 BRIm CLAY GRVL 0034 IHIHN
GRVL SAND 0057 ORWN SAND 0075 oRlm CLAY
SAND 0121 OR~IN FSND 0168 (5 0163 05 )
CON 6 16 57- 603274 1025 09/74 1204 5 fR 100 98 105 6 1/00 ST DO DI!UI!Y J
11394 4943715 OIll'IN SAND CLAY 0021 BRWN SAND 00(14 GREY
SILT 0100 BRWN SAUD 0124 (5 0120 04 )
CON 6 21 57- 601800 910 08/75 1204 5 fR 156 137 142 00 EDWAROS N
12481 4946550 Bf!HN CLAY SAND BlDR 0030 8RWN GRVl SAND
0164 (5 0161 03 )
CON 6 21 57- 601250 935 05/78 1204 5 fR 170 172 188 2 1/00 DO STACEY J
15859 4946250 8/11'IN CLAY SAND BLDR 0025 BmlN CLAY SAND
0058 OfU'/N SAND Gf!VL 0125 8111'111 SAND 0192
(S 0189 03 ) Gf!EY CLAY SILT 0192
CON 6 21 57- 601800 925 10/80 4816 5 fR 175 174 2 2/00 DO STACEY J
17180 4946700 SAND GRVL STNS 0165 CLAY SAND 0175 CSND
0190 (S 0167 03 ) fGVl 0200
CON 6 22 57- 601544 900 06/74 120(1 5 FR 198 146 183 6 1/30 ST DO LADOUCEUR II
11137 4947064 Bf!WN CLAY SAND 00(15 GREY CLAY 0059 GREY
CLAY SAND 0076 BRNN SAND GRVL 0149 GREY
SILT CLAY SAND 0162 GREY SAND CLAY 0198
BRUN SAND 0208 (5 0205 03 )
CON 6 24 57- 601000 925 03/69 120(1 4 FR 165 158 158 3 2/00 DO 1IIIS11 W
6237 4948020 CLAY "'SND BLDR 0060 HSND GRVL 0171 (S
0167 03 )
CON 6 24 57- 600250 875 06/72 1204 5 FR 179 94 102 8 1/15 ST DO HCEWEN C
8902 4947900 BRWU CLAY SAND GRVL 0024 BRWN SAND GRVl
0117 BLUE CLAY 0152 BLUE SAlJD SILT 0157
BLUE CLAY 0179 DIII'/N SAND GIIVL 0183 (S
0180 03 )
CON 6 24 57- 600041 925 04/73 1204 5 fR 160 133 144 5 1/30 ST DO SHITIIAH f
9788 4947308 BI!HN SAND CLAY 0012 BRWN SAND 0042 GREY
CLAY 0047 Bf!WN SAND GIIVL BLOII 0168 (S
0162 06 )
CON 7 1 57- 608751 1015 05/66 (1608 30 FR 90 90 1 DO 1I0RTlIE S 72i
1850 4936012 CLAY HSUD 0022 GRVL 0047 NStlll 0098
CON 7 2 57- 609295 875 07163 251(1 6 FR 62 '16 63 6 1/30 DO BAKER H II 73'
1851 4937487 TI'SL 0001 DRNN NSND CLAY 0038 NSND 0065 I
(5 0062 03 J
CON 7 2 57- 609450 880 08/69 4713 6 fR 68 40 50 10 2/00 DO SHELlSHELl
- CONTI HUED -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ...... -
Page 58
WATER WELL DATA SYSTHt 23 OCT 86 PAGE 390 GROUND WATER BULLETIN REPORT
unt CSG KItlD WATER STAT PUIIP TEST TEST OHNER/LOG/SCREEN WELL NO.
CotlCESSION WELL EASTING HEV DIA Of FOUIID LVl LVl. RATE TINE WATER fJEPTlIS III FEET TO ~III I CII
ETC LOT 110 NOR TIlING fEET fJATE DRILLER INS WATEn FEET FEET FEET GPM IIR/NN USE fORMATIONS EXTENfJ
MUNICIPALITY CODE 57007 (COIlTI NUED. . . )
7180 4937270 PRDG 00fl2 DRWII liSND sms 0064 DRh'N MSND
GHVl 0066 I
I
CON 7 3 57- 608820 810 09/71 1312 6 fn ft3 21 30 10 2/00 DO NCCAULEY R J 741
8562 4937850 I'll ft6 BRim CLAY SAND 0019 BRIm MSND 0022 GREY I
IIPAN OOfd (S 0042 04 ) BRWN SAND GRVL I
00ft6 i
CON 7 3 57- 608474 830 07/74 3660 5 fn 40 26 29 12 DO LEACII B I
11272 4937571 Blum SAtlD 0015 WHIT SAND BLDR 0035 GREY i
GnVL 0040 DnWN SAND 006fl (S 0061 03 ) I
CON 7 4 57- 607950 825 M/81 2653 6 20 25 5 DO flHESEN L 7s1
17865 4937700 SAIID 0063 (S 0061 05 ) GRVL SNDY 0065
CON 7 5 57- 607050 800 08/80 3135 5 33 48 10 1/30 DO l.ANGIll. B 76\
17406 4938500 TPSL 0001 SAtlD DRY 0033 FSND 0073 (S
0067 03 ) SAIID Cl.AY 0073 I
I
CON 7 8 57- 607246 900 11/72 4608 Dny PATTEHSOII R i
j
9418 4940612 GnEY GRVL 0050 GREY GRVL 0060
COli 7 9 57- 606120 700 10/68 4608 30 FR 31 17 DO IIOLDEU J I
771
5801 4940300 Bfll/1I Cl.AY STIIY 0031 i
COli 7 9 57- 606350 730 06/76 2652 6 FR 122 25 102 10 4/00 ST DO OElL CIEII j
13210 4940fl60 GnEY CLAY 0065 GREY QStlD 0080 GREY CLAY i
I
0112 GREY QStlD 0120 DHIIN GIWL 0129 (S !
0121 08 )
CON 7 9 57- 605750 790 10/81 2653 6 75 75 8 DO DOUGl.AS l.
17863 49ft0750 SAIID liP All Cl.AY 0290 GRVL SIl.T 0296
CON 7 10 57- 605669 785 02/73 5206 6 FR 190 154 160 50 24/00 IU DO GEll.ENY J
10303 49fl0799 BRI~II SILT 0006 SAIID GRVL Bl.DR 0140 BLUE
CLAY GnVL 0165 Dum 0170 HPAII 0190 SAND
GflVL 0225 (S 020fl 16 ) LMSII 02ftO Gnrn. i
0255 I
I
I
CON 7 10 57- 606082 725 09/74 1204 (. fR 73 40 40 10 1/15 DO IHCHARDS W II 78\
11512 4941751 emm Cl.AY SAIID 0018 GREY CLAY 0053 BRWN
CLAY SAIID 0070 BlIWN SILT 0073 BRWN SAND i
GIWL 0076 (S 0073 03 ) I
I
I
Cotl 7 10 57- 606175 750 10/77 2514 6 I'll 79 3fl '15 16 2/30 DO KOVAC fllAIIK j
15088 4941800 Bl.CK TPSL 0001 BRIIII Cl.AY 0019 GREY Cl.AY I
0060 GflEY Cl.AY I' SlID 0079 BRIIII SAND 0083 I
(S 0080 03 ) i
COli 7 11 57- 605750 750 08/76 4816 6 fR 102 41 71 30 3/00 CO ST l.OUIS SKI flESORT i
13869 4941600 fSND 0026 Cl.AY SAND GRVl. 0062 SAND GRVL
CNTn 0087 (S 0083 1'1 ) 11SIIO fSND 0117
CLAY GRVl. 0144 Cl.AY l.MSN fcnD 0177 Ll1SN !
0185 I
CON 7 11 57- 605690 850 06/77 4816 6 FR 110 fl.W 37 37 2/00 CO HOONSTOIIE SKI RESORT 791
14634 4941700 SAtIU Gnvl. 0012 ClAY 0031 CSIID 0064 SAND i
Gnvl. cllm 0093 SArlO GRVl. 0106 (S 0095 I
15 I GRVl. SAND CIIID 0125 i
-: CON 7 12 57- 605100 975 06/78 fl816 I'll ST LOUIS SKI I
15432 4941950 SAND CLAY GRVl. 0142 SAND SILT GRVL 0206 I
1
Bl.UE Cl.AY IfAlW 02f.6 SAUD Cl.AY GRVl. 0305
. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Page 59
WATER WELL DATA SYSTEN 23 OCT 86 PAGE 391 GROUND WATER BULLETIN REPORT
UTM CSG KINO WATER STAT PIIHP TEST TEST OI'ItIER/LOG/SCREEN WELL NO.
CONCESSION WELL EASTING HEV OIA Of fOUND LVL LVL RATE TUIE WATER OEPTIIS IN fEET TO WIIlCII
ETC LOT NO NORTlIHIG fEET DATE DRILLER INS WATER fEET fEET FEET GI'I1 IIR/HN USE fORMATIONS EXTEND
MUNICIPALITY CODE 57007 (CONTINUED. . . )
CON 7 12 57- 605350 837 06178 4816 HT ST LOUIS SKI
15433 4941850 SANO CLAY GRVL 0038 FSND SILT STNS 0111
SAND CLAY GUVL 0181 BLUE CLAY IIAlm 0202
CSNO SILT 0260
CON 7 12 57- 605250 915 06178 4816 HT ST LOUIS SKI
15434 4941800 CLAY SAND GRVL 0055 SANO GRVL 0120 SAIID
GRVL CLAY 0151 CLAY SILT SAND 0180 BLUE
CLAY liARD 0212 SAND SILT CLAY 0275
CON 7 14 57- 604300 1135 10176 2614 6 fR 2',3 180 255 3 2/00 00 LlIHREE GEORGE
14407 4942950 UUKN 0020 GRVL STNS 0113 liP AN 0139 BLUE
CLAY 0199 fSND 0243 CSND 0255 (S 0252
03 )
CON 7 15 57- 603802 1030 08/57 5510 4 fR 130 109 109 4 2/00 00 1'lllLAR I
1852 4943800 TPSL 0001 BRWN ClAY BLDR 0020 CLAY 0026
HSNO GRVL 0037 /lPAN 00l,2 CLAY STNS 0073
CLAY liP AN 0121 HSNO 0138
CON 7 15 57- 604049 1025 07173 1204 5 fR 80 71 85 8 1/00 ST DO ROBERTSON E
10075 4943956 BRWN TPSL 0001 GREY CLAY SAND STNS 0029
BIII'IN SAND GRVL 0103 (S 0100 03 )
CON 7 16 57- 604025 1030 11175 1204 5 FR 103 58 78 8 1/30 DO BOYI) AUT
12624 4944300 PIIDG 0007 BRWN CLAY SAND 0016 GREY SAND
0056 GIIEY CLAY SILT FSIIO 0103 GIIEY FSND
0106 (S 0103 03 J
CON 7 24 57- 601052 920 03173 120', 5 FR 201 160 180 4 1/30 DO IRISII W
9660 4948099 BRlIN SAND CLAY BLDR 0068 BRWN SAND GRVL
0118 BLUE CLAY 0201 GREY SAND GRVL 0204
(S 0201 03 )
CON 8 1 57- 610',14 920 02165 ',713 6 FR 102 65 95 7 2/00 ST 00 COLE W
1853 4937073 I'IIOG 0065 CLAY 0098 (S 0095 04 ) FSND
0102 BLUE CLAY 0150
CON 8 2 57- 610525 895 07174 3203 5 FR 72 58 64 7 2/00 DO KIWL V
11614 4937925 TPSL 0001 BIIWN ClAY 0014 GREY CLAY 0072
BRI'IN SAND ~IBRG 0078 (S 0075 03 J
CON 8 3 57- 610241 935 05/64 4713 6 fR 172 120 160 9 2/00 ST DO GILLESPIE A
1854 4938464 TPSL 0002 CLAY SItIS 0030 BLUE ClAY 0070
CLAY NSND OlbS HSHO 0172 (S 0165 07 )
CON 8 3 57- 610021 925 11/65 4713 6 FR 171 140 173 4 3/00 ST DO LITSTEII K
1855 4938830 PRDG 0046 BLUE CLAY 0100 GRVL 0135 FSND
0169 (S 0163 07 ) BLUE CLAY 0171 BLUE
FStlD CLAY 0175
CON 8 4 57- 608900 875 05170 4608 30 DRY SPEAR ART
7117 4938500 GREY HSND GRVL 0080
CON 8 4 57- 609873 825 03174 4713 6 FR 63 35 50 20 2/30 DO I'IAC AUTIIER L
11052 4939013 BLCK TPSL STNS 0003 BRHN SAND STNS 0054
BII~IN SAND 0063 (S 0059 04 )
CON 6 6 57- 608200 775 11170 ',608 HOIIANO FIIAIIK 80J.
7669 4939930 GREY NSNO QSND 0045 !
CON 6 8 57- 608186 800 06174 4816 6 FR 190 89 150 5 2/00 DO CIIESNEY R
- CONTIflUED -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- -
WATER WELL DATA SYSTI::M Dee 19 2002 P/\l;C : , COUIITY: SIMcm: (;nOUIID vlATCR BULLETIN REPonT Page 60
"
MUNICIPALITY UTt1 C~:;G KIIJIJ \.II\TEH ,;TAT [,UMP TE~;T TC,;T ,;( :1u.:CI~ m-JIJF:R
CONCESSIOU VlELL EASTING ELEV 1'11\ OF FOUIJIJ LV 1. 1.VL HATE '1'11'1[.; vIATI:H I'CPTII LI,:IIGTII {IEPTIIS W FEET TO WIIICII
ETC LOT UO IJORTII WG FEET DATE DRI1.1.CR IllS \vATI::H H,:ET H,:CT FCI,:T CI'H IIH :Im USE FEI.:T "U:T FOHI.IAT lOllS EXTEIJIJ
Well #
COUTINUING.. . ORO TOVIIISII I P
CON 03 009 57- 60'1920 1150 1961)110 41111, 06 FR 0:'00 101, 1,1:' '0 24:0 1'0 ()) (J{~ 0,1 ['ARTRIPGE 0 D
OS581 49290S0 o:.'on n4 '31(\111 C1.AY HSUD 00013 GRVL 0092 CLAY STNS 0168
H:.aIP CUIY (;fWL 011)9 MSIID FSND 0205
CON 03 009 57- 606820 1090 1966/01 471') 04 rR 0204 911 120 I) 3 :0 :':;'1' Dun7! ) OJ HC1.t:AI.1 N
03117 4920503 PHI)G 0070 C1.AY I:ISND 0153 GREY CLAY 0204 fSND
ono
CON 03 010 57- 607237 1994111 361,0 06 FR 0226 29 1(1) >. 99: !J9 [10 ~) HmSON, G1.EN
.,
31268 4927004 B1.CK 1.UAt1 OOU2 BRvlll C1.AY SAND 0040 GREY CLAY
SAnD 0091 GRF~Y SAND t;HVI. 0095 GREY CLAY SOfT
,:UFT 0110 GREY C1.AY SAND liARD 0180 GREY CLAY
(;IWL 0193 CHEY GHVL CIA! 0195 GREY CLAY 0221
';HEY C1.AY GRV1. 0226 IJHvll1 GRVL SAUD vH3RG 0220
CON 03 010 57- 608200 1100 1970/0) 11 I', 04 FH o 1 ~)O :'0 t} (I , :0 "'I' I\(J PW IIHlE 1,1. II H
.,
07695 4928600 CLAY tlSl11J IJLDR 0120 CIJ\Y MSND GRVL 0170 MSND
GRV1. 0174
CON 04 001 57- 605906- 1908/00 1503 06 FR 0441 320 '120 30 3 :0 PC o 4:J ~) 06 ,JACK, NIXOU
23790 4933792 BHI'II~ SA/H) CIJ\Y 0068 SAUD SILT 0096 BRWN CLAY
0112 BHlm HSf1D 0216 BRVlII C!.J\ Y 0224 fSIID SILT
O:>7~ (:i~EY CIJ\Y 0291 FSND SILT 0402 BRWN SAND
CIA! 04 12 SANfJ GRVL CLAY 0425 BRI>ItI CSIID 0444
F:alD 0458
CON 04 001 57- 605213 1020 1963/02 251,1 06 t'H 01(,:' 1:'0 15:) 11 ~ :0 CO 011,0 01 ~n<l IH:SOH'I'
03U3 4933605 BHlm N:>l1D CIJ\Y 00]] waw 0047 BLUE t1Stm CLAY
CRVL 0158 BLUE CLAY 0162 CSI:ID 0165
CON 04 001 57- 605385 lOSS 19'15/12 4[;16 II, FH o:~ 6] 1 :'0 II'! tEl 0 4fJ:0 CO j !\ (j!~) ') 40 IIOH~;E~)IIOE VALU;Y L'I'D
12814 4933575 CI.AY UWI. OWHI FSND 0065 CL1\Y OlIO CLAY GRVL
o !fiO H::tHi 0190 ~:AlHi ClJ\ Y LYHD 0220 J.1SND 0302
CON 04 001 57- 60S 400 10',0 1%7/11 41316 0(, HI 0/10 1.'0 1'10 ~IO :'4: 0 C:J 0."1.1 Ib IIOHc:J.:~;lIm: VI\LLEY
06606 4933500 [,H[lH 016'1 H~;IW CIJ\Y 0183 fS11D 0234 MSND CSIID
02(,0
CON 04 001 57- 605906- 1987/0', 1 ~)8 'j 06 FH on3 1 ]~) 13>1 21 ~) /4:0 J.~ " 0240 :~ 0 ~:ALIJI 1. I tIVESTI:!btJT .
21850 4933792 Bn\-JIJ SAIID 0040 BEvill CLAY 0055 fSND SILT 0090
GHF:Y CLAY liARD 0166 BHWN f'SI1O 0210 BRvlN MSND
n;lw 024S BHvltl f'SIHi 0)01 GREY CLAY 0301
CON 04 001 57- 605332 1 O:~S 1 ~n 3/09 41)16 IIOH:;F:SIIOE VALU:Y L'I'IJ
10929 4933603 (;HVL CLAY 0011 CLAY 0020 SAl1D CLAY 0076 CLAY
(iHVL 0146 SAND GHVL CLAY 0172 MSND 0302 CLAY
O:!IO
CON 04 001 57- 605906- 1988/07 1503 16 f'H 02BS 1~0 181 500 n:o CO 0::40 45 " ItlVESTJ.1bNT LTD. 24
J.
23788 4933792 Blum SAlHi 0048 BHWN CIJ\'{ 0053 BRIYN SAND 0063
BHVlI~ CLAY 006(, ,:AfllJ SiLT 0134 GREY CLAY 0192
(;HfCY t'~.;r~ IJ O~~]~:J BRvll1 11SUfJ 0260 BRVltI CSliD 0275
BlUm 11:i1W 0322 CLAY 0325 GRE:Y CLAY 0330
CON 04 002 57- 606800 1250 1981/03 '1816 0(, 119 I'IH :0 fH I 01 WI 0(, BIIMI:~LI. G
17694 4933600 ~)r\ND 0155 CIJ\Y SAnD 016:) HStlD 0194 CLAY 0200
COli 04 002 57- 606800 1250 1981/0>1 41)16 06 3:)9 :JlJO :0 [10 04] I 05 BI [lvIELL G
17695 4933'100 BHVlII SAND 015') CLAY SAND 0205 CLAY SILT SAND
(Ln~j CLAY 0401 I1StlD 040:) SAIIO SILT LYRD 0416
SAIID SILT 0555 BHvlH CIJ\Y 0560 GREY CLAY GRVL
0620
COli 04 002 51- 606800 1250 1980/12 4fJI6 02 O:~ 'H OJ BI[lWELL G
17 693 4933500 ~;^IJU o US BHvlH CIJ\Y 0172 GREY C[J\Y 0210 MSND
02~)n CUIY F:;IW 0261 FSIID 0280 CLAY Sl LT 0350
CON 04 005 57- 606490 13S0 [%(,/05 2<102 O! ()[('( HLIIAIJII.JTA'I'IOfl CUITR
0317 5 4931600 1:1~;jH' 0]02 GHVL 0105 1:1 S liP 01~7 II PAN 0219 MSND
022] III'AIJ 03:'8
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
WATER WELL DATA SYSTHI [iee ]') ~~OO2 l'iV;E CiJ!IUT'!, : ~: I H", 'I.: (;r<OIJlHJ vlATEH BIII,I,ET IIJ Hl:POHT Page 61
MUNICIPALITY U1'H c:;c; 1\1111' vlATUI :;T/IT I'IIHI' TI:,;T .n:;:T ,:'.HI.:UI mlm:H
CONCESSION ~Jr;LL f.AST !NG I:I,LV DIA OF FUII!I!> I,VI, I,VI, HA'n: T 11,11.: \.I/ITLH PI.:I'TII I,LII';TII I'U'TII,: [U [.Lj.:T TO ~III [CII
ETC LOT UO IJORTII I UG Ff.LT DATE UH1LLf:R [W; ~JAn:R fELT FI.:CT FU';T I;I'H 1IH:HII II ~ : I: FE I.:'!' H.;I.:T ["Om'I/IT I l1J.!S I:Xn:ND
#
MEDONTE TOWNSIII P
04 003 57- 604913- 1988/10 1456 05 FH OWJ! -1 'J (,11 JO 2 :0 I'" OOBI IH HINHAIJHY OF N, R.
"
23922 4935422 SHIS GIIVL liARD OOJ9 IJH\VN SAND GRVL liARD 0028
WlIlT CLAY SAND liARD 004B fJRWU HSIJD liARD 0078
BH\VN SAIiD ~;OFT 0100
04 010 57- 602556- 1988/1 J ]',0] 06 FH 0200 In 1'10 2 ~) : 15 PO 01 ~!4 01 HOBEHT, SCIIA7.f'f.R
24283 4939164 muVN ~;AND GRVI. 0075 GREY CLAY 0083 CLAY GRVL
:311,1' ()l5:) SAND CGVL OJ83 fJRWN MSIiD 0204 GREY
CLAY O? l~}
04 010 57- 602556- 1988/1 1 15B3 or, fH 0260 20B no L~ ;J!j UO 02:).' OJ ,JOIIII, lACK I E
24284 49]9164 SAND O;VL 01 JO GHF.Y ClAY OJ58 GREY SILT CLAY
(J:~ 1 0 fJHWl1 HSrlD 0260
04 010 57- 602556- 1906/1 I 390] 06 FR 026] :? 1 ~) :~ 50 ] ~) 4 :0 DO 02CO O~ ~) I S~)OIJS, W.G.
21201 4939164 IIHvll1 ~;AIIIJ f:HVL I,'IHD 01 ',~ GRf~Y ClAY STNS liARD
0:'00 BHvJII H:>IIIJ :;'rJr:: I.OOS 02(,3
04 010 57- 602556- 1987/01 7,,8J 06 FH OiOO IGO ~ :0 I ~l' 0] CLIIT, LOl>HLOl>
21291 4939164 SflllD GRVL STIJS 0075 FSIJD 0082 GREY CLAY 0115
rS11D 0119 BHWII CLAY 0129 rS11D SLTY 0175 rSND
01Bl FSII[) HSIW 0191 SAIW Gf\VL 0202 CLAY 0210
05 001 57- 606750- 1986/0'} 1503 OG ?9 13 2 :) 5 PO orn'l 01 LEII, TIIOHNr:
21003 4935068 SAil I' GHVL 0012 GRr:y CIJ\Y GRVL 0022. FSND 0045
GHE:\' CLAY 0059 SILT STt1S 0075 SAND GRVL 0084
~31 LT FGHD 0093
05 002 57- 606404- 19fJ8/03 3602 05 FH 00')1 2n 4 :) ]I 1 :30 P(J 00'1:, 03 C[JHTOS I , FRANK
23011 4935594 BH\VtI SAND 0066 GHEY CLAY liARD 0091 BRWN SAND
CLN WflHG 009B
07 007 57- 607087- 19fJ'I!05 1 :)f! 1 0,; FH 014', ~) 9 ql ]() ? :11 po III ~:' 0.\ HtlH, PC)\JGLAS
21654 ~939765 I! HI'li ~:AIIl1 OOS~) BHWN CLAY 0070 GRF;Y ClAY SOrT
11115 ClAY GI<VL 0119 ~JAIJI) GRVL 0149 GHEY CLAY
SI LT OJ6? ClfEY CIJ\Y GHVL oln Ll1S11 FCHD 0179
1.11$11 0200
07 007 57- 60708"1- 1985/0:! 2:, 1.1 06 m 0112 (~ 11 109 10 2 :0 PO 01 L' 113 Fln:J:H, C'
19694 4939765 Y LI.\~ SAND 511,T BL[>R 0112 YLLW HSND 0115
07 010 57- 606087- 19'}4/12 5206 OG FH 0195 1 ~);~ 1 (;!) 50 ~~ II : 0 I'" 022') 0) <:EI.LENY COII:;TH. LTD,
..,
20567 ~94!J48 lJJ{\.JII ~; J 1.1' 0005 BH\iN SAIW GHVL BWR 0135 BLUE
CLIIY GHVL OJ65 BLI)H OJ 72 GHEY !I PAil 0195 GREY
SAIJj) GHVL CI.II 0232
CON 03 001 57- 6047 4 5 1073 1990/11 2[jOl 10 IlL' JU6 '.1:)0 0 :2r1 co !lOHSr;S!lOr; VALLEY HE. 59
28328 4933722 SAIID 0002 GHE:Y ClAY SNDY 0007 GREY CLAY GRVL
SIIDY 0029 GHEY ClAY 00,,1 GHEY CLAY GRVL SNDY
00';'1 CHEY CLAY 00% GHEY CIJ\Y 0144 SILT CLAY
OJ 'III Gln:y ClAY on? (;IU;Y ClAY SAIIl> 0174 SA!lD
. (;HVL ClAY 0191 SAIID GHVL 02.78
CON 03 001 57- 604750 1073 1990/04 1"B3 OC FH 0214 ?9 '10 2"/5 0 :/4 IIOHSESIIOE VALLEY
26428 4933715 GHEY CIJ\Y 0050 SAIID ClAY 0065 CLAY 0150 SILT
OJ 1;0 CLAY OJ80 SAND CSND 0240 SAIID MSND 0270
CIA! 0290
CON 03 003 57- 603655- 199]/09 34 I ~ 24 FH 00 l3 110 WI LLINISOII, .JAHf:S
30184 4934660 [JIIKII 0013 CIJ\Y 0046
CON 03 006 57- 602184 820 19B8/11 I :,B3 OG FH 006:) ., ~ ~.) 5 : 4 ~) DO . ~IAYNE: FOIVLI.:H
24282 4935937 S/IIID C>l1IJ 0030 CLAY SAND 0034 GREY CLAY 0054
SAfJP HSIID OO.} ~
CON 03 006 57- 602335 820 1989/03 15B3 06 m 01:'9 1S :l!) IJ(J CHEATIVf: CONSTfWC1'IO
24859 4936018 BHYIII SAIID OOH C;f\F.Y ClAY 0049 SILT CLAY 0083
CLIIY :': 1 1.1' 0091 CHr;y ClAY SI LT CGHO 0122 BRWN
SAtlD CSHD 0130
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIX B
Existing Permits to Take Water
-
Terraprobe
Limited
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SENT BY:HORSESHOE RESORT
1- 6- 3
15:42
17058356354--1
,."'\
,.~
REso~T.
S'fSTf"~.
RENEWAL - PERMIT TO TAKE
89-
Pa
Notice of Terms and Conditions
Section 100, Ontario Water Resources Act, R.S.O. 1990
Pur~'uant to Section 34 of the Ontario Water Resources Act, R.S.O. ]990 permission is hereby g1',
to:
Horseshoe Valley Resort l..td.
Box 10, R.R. #1
Barrie, ON lAM 4Y8
for the taking of water in accordance with:
The application for this Permit to Take Water, and Schedule "A"
Schedule "B", whicn are attached to and form part of this Permit.
Located:
Lot 1, Concession 4 and
Lot 2, Concession 3
Township of Oro-Medonte
County of Simcoe
For the purposes of:
SnowmakinglGtlJf Course Irrigation/Public Supply
Subject to the fol1ow1ng terms and conditions:
DEFINrTIONS
1. (a) "Director" means a Director, Section 34, Ontario Water
Resources Act, R.$.O. 1990.
(b) "Ministry" means Ontario Ministry of Environment.
(c) "Permit" means this Permit to Take Water No. 89-P-3002
including its schedules, if any, issued in accordance wi
Section 34 of the Ontario Water Resources Act, R.S.O. 19'
(d) "Permit Holder" means Horseshoe Valley Resort Ltd.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SENT BY:HORSESHOE RESORT
17058356354'"
7057398369;#15/20
1- 6- 3
15:43
,.,\
!-~
RENEWAL. PERMrfTO TAKE",
89-P-3002
Page 2 of7
GENERAL CONDITIONS
2. This Permit shall be kept available for inspection by Ministry
staff.
3. The Director may, from time to time, where a situation of
interference or anticipated interference with water supplies
exists, or in a situation requiring information on water takings
for purposes of water resource inventory and planning, give
written notice to the Permit Holder to undertake any of the
following actions. The Permit Holder shall comply with any such
notice:
(a) To establish and maintain a system for the measurement of
the quantities of water taken;
(b) To operate such a system and to record measurements of t ~
quantities of water taken on forms provided by the Direc ,
with such frequency or for such time periods as the Director
may specify;
(c) To return to the Director records made pursuant to clause
3(b) at such times or with such frequency as the Director
may specify; and
(d) To keep records made pursuant to clause 3(b) available for
inspection until such time as they are returned tQ the
Director pursuant to clause 3(c).
4. The Permit Holder shall immediately notify the Director of any
complaint arising from the taking of water authorized under this
Permit and shall report any action which has been taken or is
proposed with regard to such complaint.
5. For Surface-Water Takings, the taking of water (including the
taking of water into storage and the subsequent or simultaneous ,_
withdrawal from storage) shall be carried out in such a manner .,
that streamflow is not stopped and is not reduced to a rate th'
will cause interference with downstream uses of water or with
natural functions of the stream.
6. For Ground-Water Takings, if the taking of water is forecast t
cause any negative impact, or is observed to cause any negativ.
impact to other water supplies obtained from any adequate sour
that were in use prior to initial issuance of a permit for thi
water taking, the Permit Holder shall take such action necessa
f, ('
W
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
S6~T BY:HORSESHOE RESORT
17058356354-.
7057398369;#16/20
1- 6- 3
15:43
..,
.........
1
RENEWAL - PERMIT TO TAKE WATER
89-P-3OO2
Page 3 of7
to make available to those affected a supply of water equivalent
in quantity and quality to their normal takings, or shall
compensate such persons for their reasonable costs of so doing,
or shall reduce the rate and amount of taking to prevent the
forecast negative impact or alleviate the observed negative
impact. Pending permanent restoration of the affected supplies,
the Permit Holder shall provide, to those affected, temporary
water supplies adequate to meet their normal requirements, or
shall compensate such persons for their reasonable costs of so
doing.
7. The Permit Holder shall report to the Director any changes of
address or telephone number, or change of ownership of the
property for which this Permit is issued and shall report to the
Director any changes in the general conditions of water taking
from those described in the permit application within thirty days
of any such change. The Permit Holder shall not assign his
rights under this Permit to another person without the written
consent of the Director.
8. This Permit does not release the Permit Holder from any legal
liability or obligation and remains in force subject to all
limitations, requirements, and liabilities imposed by law. This
Permit shall not be construed as precluding or limiting any legal
claims or rights of action Lhat any person, including the Crown
in right of Ontario or any agency thereof, has or may have
against the Permit Holder, its officers, employees, agents, and
contractors.
9. The Permit Holder must forthwith, upon presentation of
credentials, permit Ministry personnel, or a Ministry authorized
reprcsentative(s) to carry out any and all inspections authorized
by Section 15, 16 Or 17 of the Ontario Water Resources AcL,
R.S.O. 1990, Section 156, 157 or 158 of the Environmental
Protection Act, R.S.O. 1990 or Section 19 or 20 of the Pesticides
Act, R.S.O. 1990.
10. The construction of any obstruction to the natural flow of the
watercourse is prohibited without authorization by the District
Offices of the Ministry of Environment and the Ministry of
Natural Resources as well as authorization by the local
Conservation Authority.
11. The Director may, during times of drought or water shortage in.
the locality of the taking, give notice to the Permit Holder to
suspend or reduce the taking to an amount or threshold specified
SENT BY:HORSESHOE RESORT
1- 6- 3
15:43
17058356354-.
7057398369;#17/20
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'.
RENEWAL. PERMIT TO TAKE WATER
89-P-3002
Page 40f7
by the Director. The suspension or reduction in taking shall bQ
effective immediately and may be revoked at any tima upon
notification by the Director. This condition does not affect
your right to appeal the notice to the Environmental Appeal Board
under the Ontario Water Resources Act, Section 100(3).
12. The permit does not abrogate the Permit Holder's responsibility
to comply with all applicable legislation, including o. Reg.
285/99, which provides, among other things, that no person shall
use w~ter by transferring it out of a water basin (as defined in
the Regulation) in a container having a volume greater than 20
litres. The Regulation divides Ontario into three water basins,
being the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence, the Nelson and Hudson Bay
Basins.
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
13. This Permit expires May 15, 2005.
14. The Permit Holder shall monitor all water takings using a flow
meter on each well supply. Flow data should be recorded on a
daily basis.
15. The Permit Holder shall measure and record static water levels in
each production well and any available observation wells on a
monthly basis.
16. The Permit Holder, with respect to all three locations, must keep
a log book, measure and record the pumping rate, total number of
hours of pumping and the total volume of water taken on a daily
basis. This data is to be kept available for Ministry inspection
as required.
17. This permit only allows for the taking of water at the Pond
location for up to a maximum of 10% of the inflow present on the
days or days of taking. At no time shall the withdrawal rate
exceed 10% of the available inflow from the unnamed brook.
Requested taking rates may therefore have to be adjusted downward
to remain within this 10% maximum.
, SENT BY:HORSESHOE RESORT
1- 6- 3
15:43
17058356354-<
7057398369;#18/20
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
"':'1
'''',
RENEWAL - PERMIT TO TAKE W;
89-P-3OO2
Page 5 pf7
Schedule" A "
This Schedule "A "forms part of Permit to Take Water 89-P-3002.
~ ," t
\:
, J {
C7
Source 1 2 3
Source Name UX' Description Well #3 Well #2 Pond
Maximum Amount Taken per 3,864 205 621
Minute (Litres/Minute)
Maximum Amount Taken per Day 5,564,160 295,200 923,267
(Litres/Day)
Maximum Number of Hours of 24 24 24
Taking per Day
Average Number of Hours of 12 12 24
Taking per Day
Haximum Number of Days of 365 365 123
Taking per Year I
Schedule fiB"
This Schedule liB" fonns part of Permit to Take Water 89-P-3002.
..-
(2) Document entitled: "Horseshoe Resort Report on Water Supply,
Storage and Distribution", dated November 27, 1987, Revised Ma
1, 1988, prepared by Knox, Martin, Kretch Limited.
(1) Application for Permit to Take Water dated Aug 31, 1999 and
signed by Martin Kimble.
(3) Report entitled: "Aquifer Evaluation, Horseshoe Valley Ltd."
Township of Oro
S5~T BY:HORSESHOE RESORT
1- 6- 3
15:44
17058356354~
7057398369;#19/20
I
I
I
I
,>"'j
\
. ''\
)
RE.NEWAL - PERMIT' TO TAKE ~.f -
89-P- '
Page 6of7
I
I
I
In accordance with Section 100 of the Ontario Water Resources Act. R.S.O. 1990, you may by writt
notice served upon me, the Environmental Appeal Board and the Environmenzal Commissioner,
Environmental Bill o(Right:i. R.S,O. 1993, Chapter 28, within 15 days after receipt of this Notice, .;,
require a hearing by the Board. The Environmental Commissioner will place notice of your appeal on
the Environmental Registly. Section 101 of the Qntario Water Resources Act. as amended provides that
the Notice requiring a hearing shall state:
1. The porHons of the approval or each Term or CondiTion in the permit in re:rpect of which the
hearing is required, und;
2. The grounds on which you itztend to rely at the hearing ill relation to each portiun appealed.
In ai:ldition to these legal requirements, zl/.(] Notice should also include:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
3. The name of the appellant;
4. The address of the appellant;
5. The Permit to Take Water number;
6. l1le date a/the Permit to Take Water;
7. The name of the Director;
8. The municipality within which the Works is located;
The Secretary,
Environmental Appeal Board,
2300 ronge Street. 12th Floor
Toronto, Ontario
M4P 1 E4
AND
Director
Section 34
QnJ41'io Water Resources Act, RSO 1990.
Ministry of EJ~virol1Tnent
659 Exeter Road
London. Ontario
N6E 1 LJ
And the Notice should be signed and dated by the appellant.
This Notice must be served upon:
AND
by tekphQrJe at (416) 314-4600 by fax at (416) 314-4506
or
bye-mail atwww.t1.t.twv.on.ca
The Environmental CommiJsioner
J 075 Bay Street
Suite 605
6th Floor
Toronto, Ontario
M5S 2W5
Fur/her lnformatum on the Environmental Appeal Board's requiremeIlL,~ for an apeal can be obtained directly from
Board:
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
S3NT BY:HORSESHOE RESORT
; 1- 6- 3
15:44
17058356354~
.:\
RENEWAL - PERMIT TO TAKE
8
Pug
This instrument is subject to Section 38 of the Environmental Bill of Rights. that allows residents
Ontario to seek leave to appeal the decision on thi.~' instrument. Residents of Ontario may seek to
for 15 days from the date this decision is placed on the Environmental Registry. By accessing the
Environmental Registry, you can determine when the leave to appeal period ends.
DhTED AT LONDON this
eti-
day of
4(
0~~-
Director,
Section 34,
Ontario Water Resources Act
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SENT BY:HORSESHOE RESORT
17058356354-1
7057398369;# 2/ 7
; 1- 8- 3
14:53
~
Ontario
Ministry Mir ;re
of the de
Environment I' Environnement
PERMIT TO TAKE WATER
94-P-3019
Page] of6
MVN,C\PAL
5~;TEr{\
Notice of Terms and Conditions
Sectiou 100, Ontario Water Resources Act, R.S.O. 1990
Pursuant to Section 34 of the QntariQ WAter Resources Act, R.S.O. 1990 permission is hereby
granted to Horseshoe Resort C01poranon for the taking of water in accordance with the
application tor this Permit to Take Water, and Schedule "A" and Schedule "B", which are
attached to and form part of this Permit.
Located at:
Part of Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4, Concession 4
Part Lot 1, Concession 5
Township of Oro, Simcoe County
DEI'INITIONS
1.
"Director" means a Director, Section 34, Ontario Water Resources Act, R.S.O.
1990.
(a)
(b) "District Office" means Barrie District Office, Mid OntaIio Region, Ontario
Ministry of Environment and Energy,
(c) "Ministry" means Ontario Ministry of Environment and Energy.
(d) "Permit" me..1ns this entire Permit to Take Water including its schedules, if any,
is.su~d in ac<.:unlam;~ with Scction 34 of th~ Ontario Wat~r R~sources Act, R.S.O.
1990.
(e) I' Permit Holder" means Horseshoe Resort Corporation.
GENERAL CONDITIONS
2. This Permit shaH be kepl available at the offices of Horseshoe Resort Corporation for
inspection by Ministry staff.
3. The Director may, from time to time, where a situation of interference or anticipated
interference with water supplies exists, or in a situation requiring information on water
takings for purposes of water resource inventory and planning, give written notice to the
Permil Holder to undertake any of the following actions. The Permit Holder shall
comply with any such notice:
(a) To estab1ish and maintain a system for the measurement of the quantities of water
la.ken;
f1~1A tfl1JQ n
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SENT BY:HORSESHOE RESORT
17058356354'"
7057398369;# 3/ 7
; 1- 8- 3
14:53
&?)
Ontario
Ministry Mir Jre
of the de
Environment I' Environnement
PERMIT TO TAKE WATER
94-P-3019
Page 20f6
(b) To operate such a system and to record measurements of the quantities of water
taken on forms provided by the District Manager or the Director, with slIch
frequency or for such time periods as the District Manager or the Director may
specify;
(c) To return to the District Manager or the Director records made pursuant to clause
3(b) at such times or with sllch frequency as the District Manager or the Director
may specify; and
(d) To keep records made pursuant to clause 3(b) available for inspection until such
time as they are returned to the District Manager or the Director pursuant to
clause 3(c).
4. The Permit Holder shall immediately notify the District Manager of any complaint
arising from the taking of water authorinxl under this Permit. and shall report any action
which has been taken or is proposed with regard to such complaint.
5. For Surface-Water Ta.kings, the taking of water (including the taking of water into
storage and the subsequent or simultmeolls withdrawal from storage) shall be carried out
in such a manner that streamflow is not stopped and is not reduced to a rate that wilt
cause interference w1th downstream uses of water or with the natural functions of the
stream.
6. For Ground-Watt:r Taking~, if tht: taking uf water is foreca~t to cause any negative
impact, or is observed to cause any negative impact to other water supplies obtained from
any adequate sources that were in use prior to initial issuance of a permit for this water
taking, the Permit Holder shall take such action necessary to make available to those
affected a supply of water equivalent in quantity and quality to their normal takings, or
shall compensate such persons for their rcasonab1c costs of so doing, or sha11 reduce the
rate and amount of taking to prevent the forecast negative impact or alleviate the
observed negative impact. Pending permanent restoration of the affected supplies, the
Permit Holder shall provide, to those affected, temporary water supplies adequate to meet
their normal requirements, or shall compensate such persons for their reasonable costs
of so doing.
7. The Permit Holder shall report to the Director any changes of address or telephone
nUl!lb~r, or change of ownership of the property for which this Permit is issued and shaH
report to the DirectQr any changes in the general conditions of water taking from those
described in the permit application within thirty days of any such change. The Permit
Holder shall not assign his rights under this Permit to another person without the written
consent of the Director.
0070 rO.1I0 1\
; 1- 8- 3
17058356354....
7057398369;# 4/ 7
SENT BY:HORSESHOE RESORT
14:54
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
Ontario
0fi70 tmJj)1 I
Ministry Mir. )re
of the de
Environment I' Environnernent
PERMIT TO TAKE WATER
94-P-3019
Page 3 of6
8. No water may be taken tinder authority of this Permit after the expiry date of this Permit,
unless the Permit is renewed, or after the expiry date shown on any subsequent renewal
of this Permit, unless it is likewise renewed.
9. This Permit does not reJeasc the Permit Holder from any legal liability or obligation and
remains in force subject to all1imitations, requirements, and liabilities imposed by law.
This Permit shall not be construed as precluding or limiting any legal claims or rights
of action that any person, including the Crown in right of Ontario or any agency thereof,
has or may have against the Permit Holder, its officers, employees, agents, and
conrractors.
to. The Permit Holder must forthwith, upon presentation of credentials, permit Ministry
personnel, or a Ministry authorized representative(s) to carry out any and all inspections
authorized by Section 15, 16 or 17 of the Ontario Water Resources Act, R.S.O. 1990,
Section 156, 157 or 158 of the Environmental ProtecQ.Qn Act, R.S.O. 1990 or Section
19 or 20 of the ~icjQes Act, R.S.O. 1990.
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
11. This Permit expires on March 31, 2004.
I"
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SB~T BY:HORSESHOE RESORT
; 1- 8- 3
14:54
17058356354-+
7057398369;# 5/ 7
@)
Ontario
Ministry Mir, ;re
of the de
Environment I' Environnement
PERMiT TO TAKE WATER
94-P-3019
Page 4 of
Schedule "A"
This Schedule" A" forms part of Permit to Take Water 94-P-3019 dated IJ tvv .::",l... 2- .
1994.
Table 1
,
Source 1 2
Source Name or De.<;,cription Well 1 Well 2 (T.W. 1-87)
Ontario Ministry of Environment and 5723788 5721850
Energy Well Record Numher
Maximum Amount Taken per Minute 2,341 366
(Utres/Minute)
r..laximum Amount Taken per Day 3,371,000 527,040
(Li tres/Da y)
Maximum Number of Hours of Taking 24 24
per Day
Maximum Number of Days of Taking 365 365
per Year
nrJ'1Q ln~tR1 \
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SENT BY:HORSESHOE RESORT
; 1- 8- 3
14:54
17058356354-1
7057398369;# 6/ 7
~
Ontario
Ministry Mir. Jre
of the de
Environment l'Environnement
PERMIT TO TAKE WA1BR
94-P-3019
Page 5016
Schedule "B"
This Schedule "B" forms part of Permit to Take Water 94-P-3019 dated 1-1 (1/vc,t 2-,
1994.
(1) Application for a Permit to Take Water attached to a letter from Martin Kimble, Vice
President, Operations, Horseshoe Resort Corporation to Alison Chong, Ministry of
Environment and Energy, dated February 15, 1994.
()QTQ 1r1'4101\
-
~SENT BY:HORSESHOE RESORT
; 1- 8- 3
14:54
17058356354-;
7057398369;# 7/ 7
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
Ontario
Ministry Mir. :re
of the de
Environment I' Environnement
PERMIT TO TAKE WATER
94-P-3019
Page 60f6
You may by written notice served upon me and the Environmental Appeal Board within 15 days
after receipt of this Notice, require a hearing by the Board. Section lOt of the Ontario Water
Resources Act, R.S.O. 1990, as amended, provides that the Notice requiring the hearing shall
state:
1. The portions of the approval of each term or condition in the approval in respect of
which the hearing is required, and;
2. The grounds on which you intend to rely at the hearing in relation to ~ portion
appealed.
In addition to these legal requirements, the Notice shouId also incluue:
3. The name of the appellant;
4. The address of the appellant;
5. The Permit to Take Water number;
6. The date of the Permit to Take Water;
7. The name of the Director;
8. The municipality within which the works are located;
And the Notice should be signed and dated by the appel1ant.
This Notice must be served u{X)o:
The Secretary
El1vironrncntal Appeal Board
112 51. Clair Avenue West
Suite 502
Toronto, Ont<'lrio
M4V I N3
AND
The Director
Section 34
Ontario Water Resources Act, R.S.O. 1990
Ministry of Environment and Energy
7 Overlea Blvdt 4th Floor
Toronto, Ontario
M4H 1A8
DATED AT TORONTO this
nr)
~,>^->>-! day of
M ~A~. ,,~l~
, 1994,
./
.t
007IHO:!l!11\
Sfl\JT BY: HORSESHOE RESORT
; 1- 6- 3
15:40
17058356354-;
7057398369;# 5/20
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\-\ E \ Co({T 5>
S'i STEW\,
RENEWAL ~PERllifn'1V TAKE ~WATER
92-P-3078
Page I of7
Notice ot'Terms and Conditions
Section 100. Ontario Water Resources Act, R.S.O. 1990
Pursuant to Section 34 of the Ontario Wilter Rr.sourges Acj, R.S.O. 1990 permission is hereby granted
to.'
Horseshoe Valley Resort Ltd.
P.O. Box 10 Horseshoe Valley RR#l
Barrie ON
L4M 4Y8
for the taking afwater in accordance with:
The application for this Permit to Take \'later, and Schedule "All and
Schedule "B", which are attached to and form part of this Permit.
Located:
Lot 1, Concession 3
Township of Oro-Medonte
County uf Simcoe
For the purpose.s of Irrigation
Subject to the following terms and conditions:
DEFINITIONS
1. (a)
(b)
(c)
"Director" means a Director, Section 34, Qz:J,.1;ario Wa,teJ;:
Reso~rces Act, R.S.O. 1990.
"Ministryll means Ontario Ministry of Environment.
"Permit" means this Permit to Take Water No.92-P-3078
including its schedules, it any, issued in accordance with
Sec~ion 34 of the Qntario Water Resources Act, R.S.O. 1990.
(d) "Permit Holder" means Horseshoe Valley Resort Ltd.
; 1- 6- 3
15:40
17058356354-+
7057398369;# 6/20
SB\JT BY:HORSESHOE RESORT
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,.....'.,
, "
. .,.~. ~<.,
RENEWAL - PE'RMIT 7V TAKE WATER
92-P-3078
Page 2 of7
GENERAL CONDI~IONS
2. This Permit sh~ll be kept available for inspection by Ministry
staff.
3. The Director may, from time to time, where a situation of
interference or anticipated interference with water supplies
exists, or in a situation requiring information on water takings
for purposes of water resource invento:J:'Y and planning, g:. ve
written notice to the Pe~mit Holder tc undertake any of the
following actions, The Permit Holder shall comply with any such
notice:
(a) To establish and maintain a system for the measuremi:=nt: of
the quantities of water taken;
(b) To operate Euch a system and t::J record measurements of the
quantities of water taken on forms provided by the Director,
'With such frequency 01- for such t.ime periods as the Director
may sp~cify;
(c) To return to the Direct.or records made pursuant to clause
3 (b) at such times or with such freql.lency a.s the Direct.or
may specifYi and
(d) To keep records made pursuant to clause 3(b) available for
.inspection until such time as they are !:eturned to the
Director pursuant to clause 3(c).
4. The Permit Holder shall immediately notify the Director of any
complaint arising from the taking or water authorized under this
Permit and shall report any action which has been taken or is
proposed with regard to such complaint.
5. For Surface-Water Takings, the taking of water (including the
taking of water into storage and the sub:sequenL or simultaneous
withdrawal from storage) shall be carried out in such a manner
that streamflow is not stopped and is not reduced to a rate that
will cause il1terference with dovmstream uses of wa.ter or with the
natural functions of the stream.
6. For Ground-Water Takings, if the taking of water is forecast to
cause any negative impact, or is observed to cause any negative
impact to other water supplies obtained from any ade~~ate sources
that were in use prior to initial issuance of a permit for this
water taking, the Pel:mit Holder shall take such action necessary
; 1 - 6- 3
15:41
17058356354-1
7057338363;# 7/20
Sp'JT BY:HORSESHOE RESORT
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
- '"'"\
:1
RENEWAL - PERMIT TO TAKE WATER
92-P-3078
Page 3 of7
to make available to those affected a. supply of water equivalent
in quantity and quality to their normal takings, or shall
compensate such persons for their reasonable costs of so doing,
or shall reduce the rate and amount of taking to prevent the
forecast negative impact or alleviate the observed negative
impact. Pending permanent :t:esto::t:ation of the affected supplies,
the Permit Holder shall provide, to those affected, temporary
water supplies adequate to meet their normal requi:r:-ements, or
shall compensate such persons for their reasonable costs of so
doing.
7. The Permit Holder shall report to the Director any changes of
address or telephone number, or change of ownership of the
property for which this Permit is issued and shall report to the
Director any changes in the general conditions of water taking
from those described in the permit application within thirty days
of any such change. The Permit Holder shall not assign his
rights under this Permit to another person without the written
consent of the Director.
8. This Permit does not release the Permit Holder from any legal
liability or obligation and remains in force subject to all
limitations, requirements, and liabilities imposed by law. this
Permit shall not be construed as precluding or limiting any legal
claims or rights of action that any person, including the Crown
in right of Ontario or any agency thereof, has or may have
against the Permit Holder, its officers, employees, agents, and
contractors.
9. The Permit Holder must forthwith, upon presentation of
credentials, permit Ministry personnel, or a Mini.stry authorized
representative(s) to carry out any and all inspections authorized
by Section 15, 16 or 17 of the Q~tario Water Reaources Act,
R.S.O. 1990, Section 1561 157 or 158 of the EI1yironmel1tal
Protection A~t, R.B.a. 1990 or Section 19 or 20 of the Pesticides
Act, R,S.a. 1990.
10. The cunstruction of any obstruction to the natural flow of the
watercourse is prohibited without authorization by the District
Offices of the Ministry of Environment and the Ministry of
Natural Resources as well as authorization by the local
Conservation Authority.
11. The Direotor Wl.y, during times of drought or water shortago in
the looality of the taking, give notice to the per.mit Holder to
suspend or reduce the taking to an amount or threshold specified
SENT BY:HORSESHOE RESORT
1- 6- 3
15:41
17058356354~
7057398369;# 8/20
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~...., ,
..
,
R,E'NEWAL - PERMIT TO TAKE WATER
92-P-3078
Page 4 of7
by the Director. The susponsion or reduction in taking shall be
effective immediately and ~ybe revoked at any ti~ upon
notification by the Direotor. This condition does not affect
yo~r right to appeal the notice to the Environmental Review
Tribunal under the Ontario Water Resources Act, Section lOO(3}.
12. The permit does not abrogate the Pe:t.-mit Holder's responsibility
to comply with all applicable legislation, including O. Reg.
?85/99, which provides, among other things, that no person shall
use water by transferring it out of a water basin (as defined in
the Regulation) in a container having i:i volume greater than 20
1 itres. The Regulation di videa Ontario l.nto three water basins I
being the Great Lakes St. Llawrence, the Nelson and Hudson Bay
Basins.
SPECIAL_ CO~ITIONS
13. This Permit. expires March 15,200'1.
14. The Permit Holder shall monitor all water takings using a flow
meter installed at each production well. In addition the dates,
times and pumping rates shall be recQrded. A separate record
shall be maintained for each source.
15. The Permit Holder shall keep all required records up to date and
available for Ministry inspection.
16. The Permit Holder shall measure and record static (non..pumping)
water levels in the Heights Well at least once per month. Static
water levels are hereby defined as the final level to which water
in the well returns after the pump hae been shut off.
17. Any application for Permit renewal or amendment that is submitted
to the Ministry shall be accompanied by all re:cords required by
the special conditions noted on this Permit.
SEi'JT BY:HORSESHOE RESORT
1- 6- 3
15:41
17058356354~
7057398369;# 9/20
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
RENEWAL.. PERMIT TO TAKE WATER
92-P-3078
Page 5 qf7
Schedule j'A"
This Schedule "A" forms part of Permit to Take Water 92-P3078.
Source 1
Source Name or Description Heights Well
Maximum Amount Taken per Minut.e 1590
(Litres/Minute)
Maximum 1>.mount Taken per Day 2,289,600
(Litres/Day)
Maximum Number of Hours of Taking per 24
Day
Average Number of Hours of Taking per 12
Day
Maximum Nt::.rnber of Days of Taking per 124
Year
Scheaule IIBn
-;
This Schedule ItEIl forms part of Permit to Take Water 92-P3078.
(1) Application for Permit to Take Water dated January 2,2002 and
signed by Martin Kimble.
(
...--------'"
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SE1~T BY:HORSESHOE RESORT
; 1- 6- 3
15:41
17058356354-;
7057398369;#10/20
-'.'..,.
.:~'~'~!
'1
RENEWAL - PERMIT TO TAKE WATER
92-P-3078
Page 60j7
You may by written notice sen'ed upon me and the Environmental Review Tribunal wilhin 15 days
after receipt of this Notice. require a hearing by the Tribunal. Section 101 afthe Ontario Water
Resowces A ct. R.S. 0. 1990, as amellded, provides that the Notice requiring the hec1ring shall state:
1. Th~ portions of the approval of each term or condition In the approval in respect of which the hearing Is
required. and;
2. The giCJunds on which you intend to rely at the hearing in relation to ~ portion appealed.
In additiol110 these legal requirements, the Notice should also indud?'.'
3. The name of the appellant;
4. The address of the appeUant;
5. The Permit to Take Water number;
6. The data of the Permit to Take Water;
7, The name of the Director;
8. The municipality within which the works are :ocated;
And the Notice should be signed ami dated by the appellant.
This Notice must be served upon:
The Secretary,
Environmental Review Tribunal,
2300 Yonge. SrrCf:I, 12th Floor
Toronto, Ot~tario AJ4P 1 E4
Director, Secfion 34
Ontario Willer RC,$()urces....Act, RSQ..l99Q.
Ministry ofEnvir()lIment
659 Exeter Road
London, 01ltario N6E 1 L3
AND
AND.
The Eflvironmemal COlltmissioner
1075 Bay Street
Suite 605
6th Floor
TQronto, Ontario
Af5S 2 W5
Further ilif(Jrmarlon 01' the Environmental Review Tribuna/Is rC!quirements for an Ilpetll can be obtained
directlyfrom ,he Tribunal:
~
by teleplumc at (416) 314..4600 by fax at (416) 314-4506 !It. by lN1fall at 'l'Jfw.e1JJ((}v,ol"ca
SE~T BY:HORSESHOE RESORT
1- 6- 3
15:42
17058356354...
7057398369;#11/20
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'.
";- ..
RENEWAL - PERMIT TO TAKE WATER
92-P-3078
Page7of7
This instrwnenL is subject to Sectioll 38 of the En.v(rOnmelltal Bill o(.RiflhfJ., that allows residi!nts of Ontario to
seek leave to appeal the deci!>'ioll on this instrument. Residents of Ontario may seek to appeal for 15 days/rom
the daze this decision is placed Oll the Environmental Registry. By accessing the Environmental Registry. you
Can determine when the leave to appeal period ends.
DATED AT LONDON this __.---..ef::
day of ~d'ft'C' /
2002.
.Ha
Dir<:ctor, Section 34,
Ontario Water ResoUJ'ces Act
SB~T BY:HORSESHOE RESORT
; 1- 6- 3
15:42
17058356354->
7057398369;#12/20
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Mlnls.try
of the
Environment
2"" Floor
659 Exeter Road
London ON NBc 1 L3
Tel (519) 97;3-6000
1.800-265.7672
Fax (519) 873-502Q
'\
MlnlstiWe
del
f'Envtronnement
2. tt~~'
669, chemin Exeter
London ON N6E 1 L3
Tel (519) 873.5000
1.800-266-7672
Teh~c (519) 873.5020
....~ Ontario
~ '
."
May 8, 2000
Horseshoe Valley Res0l1 Ltd.
Box 10, R.R. #1
Barrie, ON L4M 4Y8
Dear Mr. Kimble:
RE: Renewal- Permit To Take Water 89-P-3002 (with amalgamation of 89-P-3055)
Lot 1 & 2, Concession 4 & 3
Township of Oro-Medonte
Couuty of Simcoe
Please find attached Permit No. 89-P-3002 issued to Horseshoe Valley Resort Ltd. which
authorizes the withdrawal of water in accordance with the application for this Permit to Take
Water, Schedule "A" and Schedule "Bit which 3m attached to and form part of this Permit.
This Permit expires May 15, 2005 and shall be kept available at al1 times for inspection by
Ontario Ministry of Environment staff.
Take notice that in issuing this Permit LO Take Water, terms and conditions pertaining to the
taking of water and to Lhe results of the taking have been imposed. The terms and conditions
have been des] gned to allow for the development of water resources, while providing reasonable
protection to existing water uses and users.
The main concern is that the taking of water under the authority of this Permit does not cause
negative impacts to other water supplies which were in use prior to the date of this Permit. If the
taking of water should result in any negative impacts, the Permit Holder will be required to
restore the water supplies of those affected in a manner acceptable to the Ontario Ministry of
Environment or to reduce the rale and amount of taking until any negative impacts arc
eliminated.
It is possible for water takings from dugout ponds to have a significant effect on water levels in
neighbouring wens. Whether or not neighbouring weBs are affected depends on a number of
factors, one of which is the depth of the pond. You shouldbeaware that any deepening of your
dugout pond may lead to significant interference with neighbouring water supply wens. If
significant interference does occur because of the water taking from your pond(s), it is your
-1-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
S~'lJT BY:HORSESHOE RESORT
1- 6- 3
15:42
17058356354....
7057398369;#13/20
~\
'"'":\
. "'
responsibility to restore the affected water supply in accordance with General Condition No.3 of -
your Pennit.
Any change of address or ownership of the property for which this Pennit is issued mll!)t be
reported promptly to the Director.
It is the responsibility of Horseshoe Valley Resort Ltd. to ensure that any person taking water
under the authority of this Pelmit is familiar with and complies with the tenns and conditions.
This permit docs not exempt the Pcmit Holder from the requirements of other legislation, such
as the Lakes and Rivers hnprovement Act and the Fisheries Act The Pennit Holder is advised to
consult with the 10ca] offices of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans, the Ministry of Natural
Resources, the Ministry of AgricuJture, Food and Rural Affairs and the Niagara Escarpment
Commission as well as the local Conservation Authority to determine thcir reguirements.
Yours truly,
b1vL~
G. Martin
Director, Section 34
Ontario Water Resources Act
CC: Barrie District Office
SWR PT7W file
-2-
.<.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIX C
Development Model
-
Tczrraprobcz
Limited
I
Confidential
I
HOTEL I TIMESHARE MODEL - OPTION C
lIorseshoe Valley- Denlopll1ent Analysis
I Resillenti:.1 Development
EXISTING DEVELOPMENT
I
Area
nuiltlin~ t~.I'('
II ()lIitS
IN IIORSESIIOE VALLEY RESORT NODE
DiTch Grove Country Club Subdivision
Ilighlands I Subdivision
Highlands II Subdivision
lIi!;hlands 111 SubJi\'ision
Ilighlands IV Subdivision
Estate lots
Simcoe Condominium
Pine Ridge SubJi...is!on
~brlccre$! Subdivision
Cathedral Pines Suhdi,-ision
Carriage 1Iills Resort -1'111
Carriage Hills Resort -1'1111
Carriage lIills Resorl -1'11111
f\du!t Li restyle Phase I
47 unil5
69 Ui1its
3& units
8 uni!.s
192 unils
13 units
65 units
65 units
50 units
% units
52 units
52 units
68 units
65 units
S80 units
I
I
I
IN IfOI!SESIfOE VIU.AGE
E:dsling: IIntd
Exisling Timeshare
101 units
40 units
142 unil..
1022 units
I
TOTAL EXISTING I>EVELOI',\lENT
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
I
IN IIORSESIIOE VALLEY RESORT NODE
Adult LiJ\:sty:le - Future Phases
limber Ridge
Carriage !li!!s Resort -PII\V
Northwcst LlOUS
Conference Centre
Single Family D\\dlings
Single family
Suit<;:.s
500 units
2~O units
n units
50 units
114 units
I
TOTAL I'IWI'OSEI> IJEVELOI'VIENT
992 units
ITotal Local Development - Existing and Proposed
1872 nnits
I
POTENTIAL DEVELOPl\IENT
Option C
Area
n\ljldin~ fype
# Cnits
I
IN IIORSESIIOE VALLEY RESOIIT :'\OIJE
NORTII OF HlGIIWAY
Timber Ridge Townhouse form Unit Clusters
Townhouse Form Clusters beside X-Country Cha!ct
Private Ski Club Unit C1usters
100 units
30 units
72 units
202 units
TOTAL :'\ORTIIIJEVELOI'''EN r
I
IN IIOI!SESIIOE \lLL\GE
sonll OF IIIGIIW,\ Y
I li!!sidc Resort
North Resort
4R unils
I()({ units
246 IIlIil"
I
\lU.Ma: COilE
('ondo Ilolel (Current Propm;alj
I/old Condominium
76 units
75 units
151 IInil..
Resort Expansion
ril1Kshan.' Suites
Slad':l'd t'nill'lustns
1:\0 units
20:-( Wl1lS
JRR ullils
I
IOTA I SOI'TIIIJEYELOI'\IfXII
7S5 ullils
I
art'a
lo~.n(.'i
2(,.7a('fCS
I{('_~"r! Silt'
ITotal Potential Dcvelo(Jment
987 units
I
ITotal Overall Residential Dcyclopmcnt
2859 units
COI11n1crciaI/Rl't:til Dc\'clopnlcnt
I
Chakl . Ilorscshoc
('!talcl - PrivJtc Ski Cluh
ruta! Existin{: ('ommen:!,,1 J)l'\'clojutlt'nl
2.HHJ ~IH
!200 sm
JfiOU sm
I
Country r-,.'1arkcl
Chakl XC Ski Club
Recreation/Spurts Centrc
1730 sm
1200 sm
!~on sm
I
parking
sp~lns
150 sp
45 sp
lOR
JOJ sjI
i2 sp
2n ~r
"fI? sp
114 sp
!I}
217 .~ II
no sp
312
271) "p
2:'1)04 sl
IV)!7 :;1
.18,751 1,(
IR,617 sf
12,917 sf
! (1,\ 4(1 ~r
"'7.6M" Isf
-----------------
-
-
7ZUIIIlI5
X-C SKI
CHALET
NORTHWEST
LANDS
50 LtmI TOWNH
UNIT au
X-C CHAL
wm:r
HILLSIDE RESORT COUNTRY MA
BIRCH GROVE!
COUNTRY CLUB
ilWUIIIlI5
1112 sums
EXISTING DAY "'-
LODGE VILLAGE CORE
EXISTING TIME HIGHLANDS
SHARE SUBDMSION
ofOUIIIlI5 PHASE II a III
>>LtmI,8 LtmI
RECREATION
CENTRE
HOTEL CONDO
15 wm:r
CARRIAGE HILLS
RESORT - IV
"'UIIIlI5
EXISTING SEWER HIGHLANDS
EASEMENT SUBDMSION
PHASE I
1i8U115
TIMBER RIDGE
TOWNHOUSE FORM
UNIT CLUSTERS
SIMCOE
CONDOMINIUM
MAPLECREST
SUBDMSION
I15U111l15
!llJLtmI
TIMBER RIDGE
CARRIAGE HILLS
RESORT - I, II, III
52~_wm:r.17ZUIIIlI5
HIGHLANDS
SUBDIVISION
PHASE IV
1!12Ltm1
HORSESHOE VALLEY
RESORT
CONCEPT PLAN
La nd Use
CONTEXT PLAN
m
FEBRUARY 2003
Oro-Medonte ChambeT of CommeTce
148 Line 7 South, Box 100
Ora, ON LOL 2XO
Phone 705-487-7337
Fax 705-487-0133
~M
"
May 14,2003
Ms. Jennifer Zieleniewski
Chief Administrative Officer
Township of Oro-Medonte
148 Line 7 South, Box 100
Oro, ON
LOL 2XO
1- RECElWlf/
I MAY 1 5 ?nt\1'
Nhi~",I&.t.lVj'!i i !;
-....\jUM~Lnr
Re: 2003 Operating Grant
Dear Jennifer:
I am writing on behalf of the Board of Directors to thank Council for the confidence expressed
by this grant. The cheque for $20,000.00, representing Council's 2003 operating grant for the
Oro-Medonte Chamber of Commerce was turned over to our Treasurer last evening.
The Chamber is planning several events throughout the year and we hope to raise our profile and
additional funds for the long-tenu health of the organization. Council's generosity, in tenus of
both the funds and the many benefits of sharing space at the Township office, is greatly
appreciated.
Yours truly,
~~fJ~) ClJ~ C~rro~-:)
Susan Woods
President
cc: J. Neil Craig, Mayor
Members of Council
I~q _\
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
REPORT
...
DEPT. REPORT NO.: TO: COUNCIL PREPARED BY:
EES2003-32 Keith Mathieson
SUBJECT: DEPARTMENT:
COUNCIL:
Terra Ridge Developments Engineering and
Inc. - Subdivision Agreement Environmental Services
C.OFW.: Part of the East Half of Lot
14, Concession 1, Designated DATE:
MOTION #: as Parts 1, 3, 4,5 and 6, Plan May 13, 2003
51 R-22770, Save and Except
DATE: Parts 1, 2 and 3, Plan 51 R- R. M. FILE NO.:
30901, Being all of PIN # D12-3342
58544-0115 (Lt)
The Township of Oro-Medonte entered into a Pre-Servicing Agreement with Terra Ridge
Developments Inc. in September, 2002, to construct municipal services for a fifteen (15) lot
subdivision located on Line 1 North, below Ski Trails Road. This development consists of a cul-de-
sac off of Line 1 North named Forest Hill Drive, which was Draft Plan approved in November, 1991
(43T-90051 ).
The Developer is now requesting the Township enter into a Subdivision Agreement (attached for
Council's perusal) and proceed with registration of the Plan of Subdivision. The required Letter of
Credit in the amount of $228,487.01, as recommended in the attached correspondence by R. G.
Robinson and Associates Ltd., will be posted prior to the municipality signing the Agreement.
1. THAT this report be received and adopted.
2. THAT upon receipt of the Letter of Credit, the Township enters into a Subdivision Agreement with
Terra Ridge Developments Inc.
3. T .f3 Clerk prepares the appropriate By-law for Council's consideration.
I
Re pectf I submitted,
}..G~
~\cl\~~
'" t u- N.~ l'V'\'. ~~\v::
'lr--- \ \~ \
)JU:J \J ~ U
(j~~
~ No ,493 04/25 '03 15:36
4
CONStJLT1NG
ENGINEERS
AND
PLANNERS
a
ID:R. G. ROBINSON AND ASSOC FAX:705 734 0764
PAGE 1/ 3
RG RoBINSON
...ND ASSOC1ATf.8 (B.\RRIE) LTD
Mr. K. Mathieson, CRSI "By Fax & Mail"
Director of Engineering & Environmental Services
Township of Oro-Medonte
Box 100
148 Line 7 South
Ora, Ontario LOL 2XO
Apri] 25, 2003
Dear Sir:
RE: Township of Oro-Medonte
Fairway Forest Subdivision
Subdiviljion Af!rcement Securities
Further to the request of the Developer's Engineer, we herein provide the following
documentation regarding our recommendation for posting of securities for the Fairway Forest
Subdivision.
· Schedule "D"- Itemized estimate of cost of construction of each part of the works;
· Letter of Credit reduction calculation sheet for Fairway Forest Subdivision;
The original amount under Schedule "D" was for the value of $355,836.53. Based on our
review of the Developers Engineer's fax dated April ]6, 2003, we now recommend that the
foHowing securities be retained by the Township
Outstanding work. . , . . .. . .. , .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . ..
Allowance for Engineering (10%.).. ,.... ...... ....
G.S.T. (7%).............................. ..............
20% of completed work. . .. ." .. . .. ., .. '" .. " .. ....
Tota.l security to be posted.....,...................,
$167.077.00
$16,707.70
$12,864.93
$31,837.38
$228,487.01
We trust that you wi1J find the above in order and we would appreciate confinnation of the
reduction in securities for our records,
Yours truly,
RG. ROBINSON AND ASSOCIATES (BARRIE) LTD.
~?~-
S'. Patterson, C.E. T
SP:jd
Copy: J. Zieleniewski
D. Williams, Skelton Brumwell
S04
File #12-89129-51
10 High Street, Barrie:?, Onwrio UN !\'il) (70S) 721-9222 Fax (705) 734-0764 engplan€ir!T(.!.()'f\,CIl
@
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
REPORT
DEPT. REPORT NO.: TO: COUNCIL PREPARED BY:
EES2003-33 Keith Mathieson
SUBJECT: DEPARTMENT:
COUNCIL:
Beard's Farm Supply Limited Engineering and
- Site Plan Agreement Environmental Services
C. OF W.: Part of the East Half of Lot
1, Concession 11, Being Part DATE:
MOTION #: 3, 51 R-12482 and Part 1, Plan May 13, 2003
51 R-18249, Being all of PIN #
DA TE: 58529-0113 (Lt) R. M. FILE NO.: L04.126~q
,.
Beard's Farm Supply Limited is requesting to enter into a Site Plan Agreement with the Township to
construct a 54' x 80' farm equipment storage shed at their existing business located at #1032
Horseshoe Valley Road.
Mr. Beard's Site Plan application was presented to the Site Plan Committee on May 9, 2003. The
Committee has no concerns with Mr. Beard's proposal.
Township staff was circulated for comment and have no concerns with the proposed storage shed.
The County of Simcoe has been circulated a copy of the Site Pan for comment and as of May 13,
2003, the Township has not received their comments.
1. THAT this report be received and adopted.
2. THAT upon receipt of approval from the County of Simcoe, the Township enters into a Site Plan
Agreement with Beard's Farm Supply Limited to construct a 54' x 80' farm equipment storage
shed.
3. T ~i,he Clerk prepares the appropriate By-law for Council's consideration.
~\\~CJ;
'J~cY\\
111
, ')
ORO-MEDONTE RECREATION
ADVISORY COMMITTEE
MINUTES
..
Monday, May 12, 2003 - @ 7:00 p.m.
Oro-Medonte Administration Centre
Chair:
Councillor Ruth Fountain called the meeting to order
at 7:00 p.m.
Present:
Councillor Ruth Fountain, Councillor Harry Hughes, Dave Knox,
Ian Hunter, Catherine Riffer-Wessel
Regrets:
Mayor J. Neil Craig, Deputy Mayor Walter Dickie
Staff Present:
Chris Carter (Recreation Co-ordinator)
1. Adoption of Agenda for Monday, May 12,2003:
Motion No.1
Moved by Mr. Knox, Seconded by Ms. Riffer-Wessel
It is recommended that the Agenda for the Monday, May 12, 2003 Recreation
Advisory Committee meeting be adopted as printed and circulated.
Carried.
2. Disclosure of Pecuniary Interest:
None.
3. Adoption of the Thursday, April 10, 2003 Minutes:
Motion No.2
Moved by Mr. Hunter, seconded by Mr. Knox
It is recommended that the minutes of the April 10, 2003 Recreation Advisory Committee
Meeting be adopted as printed and circulated.
Carried.
1
4. Deputations:
...
None.
5. Unfinished Business:
(a) Discussion and Recommendations with respect to the DRAFT Ball Diamond and
Ice Allocation Policy.
Motion No.3
Moved by Mr. Knox, Seconded by Ms. Riffer-Wessel
It is recommended that the information provided in the discussion re: Draft Ball Diamond
and Ice Allocation Policy be received.
Carried.
(b) 2003 Summer Day Camp Programs.
Motion No.4
Moved by Ms. Riffer-Wessel, Seconded by Mr. Knox
It is recommended that the information presented re: Summer Day Camp Programs be
received.
Carried.
(c) Update: 2003 Capital Projects (Rec Dept.)
Discussion.
6. Correspondence:
None.
2
7. Co-ordinator's Monthly Report:
Motion No.5
Moved by Mr. Hunter, Seconded by Mr. Knox
It is recommended that the Co-ordinator's monthly report be received.
Carried.
8. Other/N ew Business:
None.
9. Questions:
None.
10. Adjournment:
Motion No.6
Moved by Mr. Knox
It is recommended that the May 12, 2003 meeting of the Oro-Medonte Recreation
Advisory Committee does now adjourn at 8:18 p.m.
Carried.
Next Meeting: Monday, June 16th, 2003 @ 7:15 p.m.
3
THE CORPORATION OF THE
TOWN8tIIP
-&~~~~
TENT POLICY
\L\-a-\'
. ..... ... "-
1
Box 1 00
Oro. Ontario
LOL 2XO
Telephone
(705) 487-2171
Fax
(705) 487-0133
...
1. Up to 645 sq. ft. (60 sq.m) no permit is required.
2.
3.13.1.4
3.13.1.5
3.13.1.6
"l~"- FTr
3.13.1.10
apply (see attached)
3. Over 2420 sq~ft. (225 sq.m)
Design and review by Engineer required.
3.13.1.3
3.13.1.7
3.13.1.8
FlAr ""
INSP'~~!-... ~F~ . h~:7:P'"
3.13.1.9 apply
.
.00
~OLJ
Tents
..
Section 2.4. Permits and
Inspections
2.4.1. Pennits
.\~r
. . \...,\
2..4.1.1. Requirement for Pennits
(5) A tent or group of tents is exempt from the
requirement to obtain a permit under Section 8 of the Act and
is exempt from compliance with the Code provided that the
tent or group of tents are:
(a) not more than 60 or in aggregate ground area, total area 645 sq. ft.
(b) not ;J~ to a buDding, and
(c) const:rUaCd more than 3 m from other 1ttUCbIIeS.
3.13.1. Tents
3.13.1.2. General
(1) Except as provided in Semepcc (2), the requirements
of this Subsection shall apply to all tents.
(2) Articles 3.13.1.4.,3.13.1.5.,3.13.1.6. and
3.13.1.10. apply to tents that
(a). do not exceed 22S or (2,420 ft2) in ground area, .
(b) do not exceed 22S nr (2,420 ft2) in aggregate ground
area and are closer than 3 m (9 ft 10 in) apan,
(c) do not contain bleachers, and
(d) are DOt enclosed with sidewalls.
~
.'
3.13.1 A. Clearance to Other Stftlctures
(1) Tents shall not be erected closer than 3 m (9 ft 10 in)
to the propeny line.
(2) Except as provided in Sentences (3), (4) and (5),
tents shall not be erected closer than 3 m (9 ft 10 in) to other
tents or sU'Uctures on the same property.
(3) A walkway between a building and a tent occupied
by the public is permined provided,
(a) the tent is not closer than 3 m (9 ft 10 in) from the
building, and
(b) the walkway conforms to Article 3.2.3.18.
(4) Tents not occupied by the public need not be
separated from one another, and are permined to be erected
less than 3 m (9 ft lOin) from other structures on the same
propeny, where such closer spacing does not create a hazard
to the public.
(5) Tents located on fair grounds or similar open spaces,
need not be separated from one another provided such closer
spacing does not create a hazard to the public.
3.13.1.5. Clearances to Flammable
Material
A
(1) The ground enclosed by a tent and for not less than 3
m (9 ft 10 in) outside of such sU'Ucture shall be cleared of all
flammable or combustible material or vegetation that will
carry fife.
3.13.1.6. Flame Resistance
(1) Every tent, and tarpaulins, decorative materials
fabrics and films used in connection with tents, shall be '
certified to CANIULC S-I09-M, "Standard for Flame Tests
of Flame-Resistant Fabrics and Films", or NFPA 701
"Standard Method of Fire Tests for Flame-Resistant Textiles
and Films".
3.13.1.10. Provision for Fire Fighting
(1) Access shall be provided to all tents for the purpose
of fire fighting.
. \
..
3.13.1
Tents
As per 3.13.1.2(2)
Articles 3.13.1.4, 3.13.1.5, 3.13.1.6
and 3.13.10 do not apply to tents that are:
(a) greater than 2,420 square feet in
ground area,
(b) greater than 2420 square feet in
aggregate area (total area) and .are not closer
than 9' 10" apart
(c) contain bleachers or
(d) enclosed with sidewalls
shall comply with all
3.13.1.3. Means of Egress
-(1) Except as provided in Sentences (2) and (3), tents
shall conform to Scctions 3.3. and 3.4.
(2) A tent need not conform to Article 3.4.6.11. except
where swing type doors are provided.
(3) Where the area between adjacent tents or a tent and
the propeny line is used as a means of egress, the minimum
width between stake lines shall be the width necessary for
means of egress, but not less than 3 m (9 ft 10 in).
3.13.1.7. Design of Framing and
Supports
(1) The supponing framing structure and anchorage
system for tents shall be designed and reviewed by a
professioTllJi engineer.
3.13.1.8. Bleach....
(1) Where bleachers are provided in tents, they shall be
designed in conformance with Articles 3.3.2.8., 3.3.2.10.,
4.1.6.11., and 4.1.10.6.
3.13.1.9. Sanitary Facilities
(1) Except as provided in Sentence (3), the minimum
number of water closets for tents shall be determined in
accordance with Table 3.7.4.3.E.
(2) Article 3.7.4.16. applies to sanitary facilities in
Sentence (1).
(3) Sanitary privies, chemical closets or other means for
the disposal of human waste may be provided in lieu of toilet
fixtures.
I, Jorge M. Bartolo, am presenting the following questions, to the Mayor and council, with a copy
to the clerk, regarding the changes to the Water system charges in the Oro-Medonte Township. I
would appreciate a written reply from each councilor on these issues.
I can understand that the municipality would attempt to develop a uniform charge to provide water
to the residents of the individual communal water systems. Although having all the residents cover the
expenses of upgrading inadequate systems is not proper. Each individual system's upgrading expense
should be borne by the respective users.
Also as the Mayor stated,7 cents a gallon is not the true cost of water in Oro-Medonte to each of
it's users. Let's not forget the Provincial funding which is not being distributed fairly. How much are
the residents paying in the areas who did not receive the funding they deserved?
If adequate notification had been presented prior to the enactment of this by law, these questions
would have been asked at that time.
This council appears to try to make changes very quietly so that the residents who are effected
don't have a chance to be involved.
. Please explain how Bill 175 forces the township to charge it's completely separate water system
users at the same rate when it is quite obvious that each system has it's own operating costs based
on size, condition and the number of people who use it.
. In reviewing Bill 175, I have to point out that this bill only states that the regulated entity which
provides water services to the public must have a plan on how it intends to recover the full cost of
providing those services. Nowhere does it state that the separate systems which the township
operates must pay for the inefficient systems which the township choose to accept when new
developments were designed and approved for development by the Township. If! am wrong then
please quote the relevant section of the Bill where this is stated.
The following is a section from Bill 175
COST RECOVERY PLAN
Cost recovery plan for water
services
9. (l) Every regulated entity that provides water services to the public shaH prepare and approve a plan describing how the
entity intends to pay the full cost of providing those services.
Auditor's review
(2) The regulated entity shaH not approve the plan before giving the plan to the municipal auditor for review
and receiving the written opinion of the municipal auditor on the plan.
Same
(3) The opinion of the municipal auditor shaH address the prescribed matters, contain the prescribed information
and be in the prescribed form and shaH be submitted to the regulated entity by the date specified by the regulated
entity, which shaH not be later than 30 days before the regulated entity is required to submit its plan to the Minister.
Plan submitted to Minister
(4) The regulated entity shaH submit the approved plan and the municipal auditor's opinion on it to the Minister
by the day that is six months after, (a) the date prescribed for the purpose of subsection 3(4); (b) if an extension is granted
for the purpose of subsection 3 (4), the extended date; or (c) if the Minister prepared a report on behalf of the
entity, the date the Minister gave the report to the entity.
Contents
(5) The plan must meet the requirements of this Act and the regulations.
Form
(6) The plan must be made in a form approved by the Minister.
. Who was the municipal Auditor who approved this cost recovery plan?
. When I questioned Keith Mathieson last year in regards to the 40% increase and why we were not
informed prior to receiving our quarterly water bills, he went through a lengthy explanation as to
the oversight and that in the future there would be notification given.
. Why was Keith Mathieson not present to answer questions at the public meeting?
1
\l\b -d-
· Please explain, why a note was not added to the last quarterly bill, notifying the users of dedicated
systems that there was a meeting planned? It could even have been printed on the 6 inches of
wasted space on the water bill.
· Last year Keith Mathieson explained how our increases were all different and based on what the
true system costs for operating the individual water systems for each area and how they were
planning for the future work, which was to be done.
· Why did the Harbourwood subdivision, charge to supply water, increase approximately 25% above
all the other systems last year?
. Yet this year we are not compensated with any provincial funding which we were entitled to
receive. Please explain this.
. The costs of operating individual systems are different, as indicated in your summary, the average
increased cost would be an additional $69 per user. Then why have you applied an increase of
$165?
· If this exorbitant increase is to build reserves, what reasoning was used to come up with the
number, as Bil1175 does not say that you must build reserves at 20% of the rate, but does state:
. The Act specifies that the full cost of providing services includes source protection costs, operating
costs, financing costs, renewal and replacement costs and improvement costs. The full cost may also
include other costs specified in the regulations.
. Why must others be forced to subsidize some one who did not have an adequate system installed
or improved to keep up with good water management practices?
. When new subdivisions in rural areas are installed the water system usually is at the expense ofthe
homeowner. Quite often the developer installs these systems at his expense. This expense is then
passed on to the home owner who would purchases it as part of the purchase price of the property
or serviced lot. The Harbourwood area has been in existence since around 1985, and the residents
have been paying separately for the use and maintaining their system. Why must they now pay for
some one else's system? .
· The two systems which are now costing over $2000 a home to operate must be seen as a overall
burden to the rest of the township and can not be continued to operate this way. How can you
justify this?
· The residents must be charged the full amount to operate their system or will the council pass a by-
law to force the rest of the homes in the surrounding area to hook up to the system?
· The biggest question comes, how was this situation allowed to happen, there was no plan for future
expansion when these subdivisions were built. Who has been subsidizing the water bill for these
residents?
· Presently if some one wants to hook up to the water system there is a very small charge,
somewhere around $200, I believe. Why is it that any other municipalities charge a few thousand
dollars to recover some ofthe capital costs, or build a fund for the future needs?
. Will a by-law be in acted to implement such a change and possibly create a "sale" situation by
allowing immediate connection at a bargain to encourage more use where possible?
. How many users does the water system at Horseshoe Oro and Horseshoe Medonte represent in
comparison to the rest of the township when looking at building reserves for future infrastructure?
Have they or will they receive provincial funding?
2
\
I
· Harbourwood has not received provincial funding, why not???? But we are being asked to pay the
same rate. . .
· Why must the rest of the residents in the township pay for Horseshoe Valley resort to make
profits? They seem to have control of their systems, and they are receiving provincial funding.
· Why is a private company being allowed to run a water system, which has evidence of being
abused in the past for making snow and watering the golf course at the expense ofthe township?
· At what rate does Horseshoe resort pay for water and how much have they contributed to the
future reserves pot?
· Please explain the details for the 2003 capital being spent in Warminster, at $434,500, this almost
seems as if we are paying for the two subdivisions which are planned for this area.
· A resident of the area has told me, that the well for Warminster may actually be in Severn
Township. Are there implications for this situation?
· It appears that the systems located in the old Medonte Township are in need of the most influx of
capital, these were also the systems with the lower rates in the year 2002. Why do the rest of us
who paid our share in the past have to foot the others bill.
· Will the $60K be left to the sole use of the Harbourwood water system users?
· One of my neighbors who has been living in the Harbourwood subdivision since it was built years
ago, explained how the residents paid extra taxes for a 10 year period to cover the costs of
upgrades to solve water pressure problems. Why are the people who are actually effected not the
ones paying for their own upgrades? I won't benefit from their improvements.
· Where have the directives come from to implement a escalating water rate charge and what
scientific data used to base the flat rate level to be enacted at?
· How can you charge some residents for water usage beyond the flat rate volume? When a large
number of users are not being metered.
· Please provide a detailed list of where the capital expenses are to be used and when.
· I would like to see the operating costs broken down for the operation of the individual water
systems.
· What is the kilowatt hour rate the township pays at the individual pump houses?
· How many of the councilor's homes are on the municipal water systems? Do they even care or did
they take the time to investigate the By Law properly or did you just "go with the Flow"?
· Please provide me with a copy of the materials the council reviewed before voting on these
changes.
In the end, I can only say that a uniform rate for the township is a good idea, if the corresponding
systems are all at the same level of infrastructure. I can not agree to pay hundreds of thousands of
dollars to bring someone else's system up to standard. Especially if our own system has been
maintained properly at our own expense already.
I implore this council to amend this by-law so that the relevant costs for each individual system's
upgrading expenses are borne by the respective users. Then you can truly implement a fair equal rate
for water consumption across the complete township and build reserves for every one fairly.
Regards,
Jorge M. Bartolo
3
MUNICIPALITY OF CHATHAM..KENT
~\~
315 KING STREET WEST · P.O. Box 640 · CHATHAM, ONTARIO · N7M 5K8
May 5, 2003
\L\c- \
-
I
TO: ALL REGIONAL MUNICIPALITIES, COUNTIES AND DISTRICTS IN THE
PROVINCE OF ONT ARlO
Re: Incarceration of Criminals Convicted of First Degree Murder in Minimum
Security Facilities
The Corporation of the Municipality of Chatham-Kent at its meeting held on April 22,
2003 considered the above noted matter and the attached resolution was adopted in
support of a resolution passed by the Canadian Association of Police Service Boards.
The Municipality of Chatham-Kent is seeking the support of your Council regarding the
above issue. Please forward your response to the Solicitor General of Canada and
provide a copy to the undersigned. We thank you in advance for your support in this
matter.
Yours very truly,
B~~
Infonnation Coordinator,
Administrative and Governance Services
e-mail: brendap@chatham-kent.ca
Attachment
cc: Canadian Association of Police Boards
Solicitor General of Canada
Jerry Pickard, M.P. Chatham-Kent Essex
Rose-Marie Vr, M.P. Lambton-Kent Middlesex
Mayor and Members of Council
Joe Pavelka, Chief Administrative Officer
Agenda/2003/1etters and memos/AU municipalities re Incarceration
www.city.chatham-kent.on.ca
CHATHAM-KENT CALL CENTRE: (519) 360-1998
MUNICIPALITY OF CHATHAM..KENT
315 KING STREET WEST · P.O. Box 640 · CHATHAM, ONTARIO · N7M 5K8
-
\l\c-;l
NOTICE OF COUNCIL DECISION
The Corporation of the Municipality of Chatham-Kent adopted the following resolution
at its meeting held on April 22,2003:
Re:
Incarceration of Criminals Convicted of First Degree Murder in
Minimum Security Facilities
"WHEREAS there are insufficient controls to prevent criminals convicted of first degree
murder from being incarcerated in minimum security facilities;
WHEREAS some of these criminals have simply walked away from these institutions to
become a serious risk to society as well as a tremendous drain on police resources in
seeking out the return of these offenders:
WHEREAS the escape of these criminals fTom these insecure facilities cause serious
public alann; and
THEREFORE be it resolved that the Council for the Municipality of Chatham-Kent
support the Canadian Association of Police Boards in its efforts to express its concerns to
the Solicitor General of Canada about criminals convicted of first degree murder being
incarcerated in minimum security facilities, and request that immediate corrective action
through changes to corrections policy be taken to prohibit the incarceration of criminals
convicted of first degree murder in minimum security facilities."
Carried Unanimously.
www.city.chatham-kent.on.ca
CHATHAM-KENT CALL CENTRE: (519) 360-1998
Canadian Association of Police Boards
Page 1 of5
2001 Conference
President's
Nomination Report
Resolutions
from
Groups
Concurrent
Sessions
Cal1adlafJ Ass.ociatiolJ of Police Board
Home
About CAPS
Our Services
Members' Area
o
Resolutions
\l\c-3
The following resolutions received the support of the membership:
ct-'
Resolution 01-1:
Incarceration in Minimum Security Facilities
WHEREAS there are insufficient controls to prevent criminals convicted of first
murder from being incarcerated in minimum security facilities; and
WHEREAS some of these criminals have simply walked away from these institlJ
become a serious risk to society as well as a tremendous drain on police resource
seeking out the return of these offenders; and
WHEREAS the escape of these criminals from these insecure facilities causes se
alarm;
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Canadian Association of Police B(
express its concern to the Solicitor General of Canada about criminals convicted
degree murder being incarcerated in minimum security facilities, and request tha
corrective action through changes to corrections policy be taken to prohibit the it
of criminals convicted of first degree murder in minimum security facilities.
Resolution 01-2:
Raves
WHEREAS several young people in Canada have died as a result of drugs taken
attending raves, or as a result of traffic accidents involving fatigued youth leavin
raves; and
WHEREAS research undertaken by police services in Canada and the United St,
revealed that dangerous psycho-active "designer" drugs such as Ecstasy, GHB at
Ketamine are readily available at raves and are consumed by the majority of peo]
attending raves; and
WHEREAS rave organizers fail to require identification as the events are adverti
alcoholic, and police are concerned that children under the age of 16 attending ra
violation of the curfew in the Child and Family Services Act or other similar stat
WHEREAS raves are often held in unsafe and overcrowded venues, causing con
police and fire marshals; and
WHEREAS there is a critical need for youth, parents, paramedics and emergenc~
personnel to gain an understanding of raves, the health risks associated with then
effects of using various "designer drugs" in combination;
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Canadian Association of Police B(
the federal government to:
a) in collaboration with police organizations, develop and disseminate education;
regarding the dangers of raves and related drugs;
b) examine possible legislative actions that could be taken in response to the dan
by raves; and
c) develop a proactive harm reduction approach to providing support to those ad'
I~ _ _~r 1"\^^"1 1~~~-C'") .....t..................1
")~/()L1!O~
SERVING ROAD SUPERINTENDENTS, SUPERVISORS, MANAGERS AND FOREMEN IN ONTARIO
I RECEIJjr... -.-.
I ....,r:D ,
;: MAY 1 ~ 2003 f
V.i,,,, -......""U~TI: ,i
_ T01NN~U'D
\q~-\
Mayor and Members of Council
Warden and Members of Council
Reeve and Members of Council
Dear Council:
On behalf of the Association of Ontario Road Supervisors, please accept this as your
personal invitation to attend the 2003 Municipal Trade Show, June 4 and 5, 2003, to be
held at the Lindsay Recreation Complex in Lindsay, Ontario.
The Trade Show provides an opportunity for municipal employees and contractors to view
products and services required by municipalities. Enclosed is a free advance registration
form (make additional copies as required). Please complete and return by mail or fax to
A.O.R.S. office (519-461-1343) by May 23,2003. Your badge can be picked up at the
advance registration booth when you arrive. You may also register on-line at
www.aors.on.ca.
We thank you for your support and look forward to seeing you and your representatives
in Lindsay. In the meantime, if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Yours truly,
c(f;~~
Bryan Clarke, CRS-S
Chief Administrative Officer
Encl.
C:\MyFiles\Trade Show 2003\Councils invitation.wpd
P.O, Box 129
Teiephone:
ie, Ontal'io NOM 2 PO
1 1 -1
Association of Ontario Road Supervisors
2003 MUNICIPAL TRADE SHOW
June 4 & 5, 2003 \~ ~ --;L.
Advance registration is FREE
Complete application below & fax to 519-461-1343
OR register on-line at www.aors.on.ca
The Kawartha Lakes Public Works Association will be hosting the Association of Ontario Road Supervisors
2003 Municipal Trade Show in Lindsay, Ontario on Wednesday, June 4th and Thursday, June 5th, 2003
at the Lindsay Recreation Complex. The Trade Show hours are 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. each day. Advance
registration is FREE. Registration at the gate is $5.00.
Complete application below and return by mail or fax OR re2ister on-line at www.aors.on.ca.
A broad range of suppliers of products and services for both municipal and construction organizations will be
represented, including:
. Construction Equipment . Fire Fighting Equipment
. Construction Companies . Parks & Recreation Companies
. Highway Sign Equipment & Materials . Maintenance Equipment
. Sewer Equipment & Materials . Consulting Engineers
. Water System Equipment & Material . Recycling Equipment
. Erosion Control Products . Education and Safety Consultants
. Personal Safety Equipment & Clothing'
Advance registration must be received by May 23, 2003.
To qualify, please mail or fax to:
Association of Ontario Road Supervisors
P.O. Box 129, Thorndale, ON NOM 2PO
Phone: 519-461-1271 Fax: 519-461-1343
Pick up badges at Advance Registration Booth on June 4 & 5 only.
Advance Registrations will be entered in the Daily Door Prize Draw
Registrants must be present to win.
P!ease fee! free to copy this form as required to accommodate your group or organization.
NAMES
ORGANIZATION
TITLE
The 2003 Trade Show Committee wishes to extend an invitation to everyone
to attend the "Best Show in Canada" in Lindsay on June 4 & 5, 2003.
! Kenrei Road
, \'--\<1- 3
~ z ,
, f
(/) 15 I'
!!
~ c;; 1/
1
~ '& il
.... ~ -,
w
z I,
w
IL Thunderbridge Rd. , BOBCAYGEOO-
4 I
35
Cobome Street W.
s
.ss
t.
, ~ent St. W.
...
(I)
Kent Street W
4
Mary St. W.
(I)
uj
"
,i
~
0<
Russel St.
(I)
<ii 0urt1am St.
I
S.5.F.c.
L......,
R.ec""UO.
Complex
Litle Briain Rd.
- LINDSAY ·
Undsay Recreation Complex -133 Adelaide Sl S.
Sir Sandford Fleming College (S.S.F.e.) - 200 Albert Sl S.
35
II
<ii
12
>
~.
Vi
Needham St.
\
Cobome St. E
,
\
\
\
\
\~-
\~
\\\,
'\\
\
\
\
\
PETERBOROUGH -
,
,
\
,
\
,
For complete listings on accommodation, restaurants etc.,
visit website www.city.kawarthalakes.on.ca or call Tourism Office at 1-866-EXPLORE
to receive a tourism package or e-mail tourism@city.kawarthalakes.on.ca.
CiUI o~
\ r \ I
\\.1e-
Pickering Civic C~
One The Esplanade
Pickering, Ontario
Canada
L1 V 6K7
Direct Access (905) 420-4660
cityofpickering.com
=>1
DMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT
lerk's Division
IVlSlon (905) 420-4611
lcsimi!e (905) 420-9685
erks@city.pickering.on.ca
May 5,2003
J RfCf11ittr
}.fAr 1 2
2003 .
OI1"'~I.
"'O~/N~UlVr~
~'HI/)
TO THE HEAD OF COUNCIL
Subject: - Ontario Regulation 154/03 Filed Under The Planning Act
- Order Made Pursuant To The Ontario Planning & Development Act, 1994
Dear Head of Council:
Please find attached to this letter a copy of Resolution #61/03 passed by the Council of the City
of Pickering on April 28, 2003.
As noted in the Resolution, the Minister of Municipal Affairs filed two orders on April 17, 2003
under the Planning Act and the Ontario Planning & Development Act, 1994, that essentially
transfers the planning functions for a quarter of the geographical area of Pickering from the City
to the Province. The Resolution passed by Council on April 28th is a request for the Premier,
the Speaker or one of the opposition party leaders to petition the Legislature to repeal these
orders.
On behalf of the Council of the City of Pickering, I would ask that your Council endorse the
actions being taken by Pickering Council and notify the Premier, the Speaker and the opposition
party leaders of your Council's decision.
If you require any further information with respect to this matter, please do not hesitate to
contact me.
Yours truly
#.'~
~ .
?~TaYIOr, AMCT, CMM
City Clerk
Attachment
\\f~ -~
RESOLUTION OF COUNCIL
DATE: APRIL 28, 2003
MOVED BY: COUNCILLOR MCLEAN
SECONDED BY: COUNCILLOR HOLLAND
WHEREAS in a resolution passed by the Council of the Corporation of the City of
Pickering on February 4, 2002, directed the Director of Planning & Development
to report on the elements of a Growth Management Study which would provide
the basis for an Official Plan Review of all lands within the northern boundary of
Highway #7 and the southern boundary as the C.P. Belleville Rail line; and
WHEREAS in the resolution passed by Pickering Council on February 4, 2002, it
was noted that the Official Plan Review would form the basis for how Pickering
will manage future growth pressures; and
\liHEREAS in a r€Bolution passed. on May 21, 2002, Pickering Councii
established a Working Group whose mandate was to prepare detailed terms of
reference for the Growth Management Study; and
WHEREAS this Working Group was comprised of representatives of the City,
including Members of Council, the Ministry of Municipal Affairs & Housing, the
Region of Durham, the TRCA and various community stakeholder groups; and
....12
2
ILt-e -3
WHEREAS planning consultants, through the public tendering process, were
invited to submit proposals, based on the detailed terms of reference prepared by
the Working Group, to carry out the Growth Management Study; and
WHEREAS Pickering Council enacted By-law Number 6013/02 on July 29, 2002
to impose Interim Control over the study area; and
WHEREAS no objections were received by the City of Pickering with respect to
the passing of Interim Control By-law Number 6013/02; and
WHEREAS the consulting firm of Dillon and Associates was selected to
undertake the Growth Management Study and have held a series of Task Force
Meetings and has held a public Open House advising residents of the Study and
receive feedback; and
WHEREAS in a resolution passed on October 21, 2002, Pickering Council
expressed its concern that the North Pickering Land Exchange Review Panel
was initiating planning processes and principles in isolation of initiatives already
undertaken by the City of Pickering through its Growth Management Study; and
WHEREAS in a letter dated October 22, 2002 to the Honourable Chris Hodgson,
Minister of Municipal Affairs & Housing, Mayor Arthurs conveyed the resolution
passed by Council on October 21,2002 and went on to state Council's desire to
work in cooperation with the Province to arrive at the best possible land use plan
on the understanding that the best plan can only be accomplished if local and
Regional planning processes are respected and the Province works
cooperatively with the City of Pickering and the Region of Durham; and
WHEREAS in the letter dated October 22, 2002, Mayor Arthurs requested that
Members of Council have an opportunity to meet with the Minister of Municipal
Affairs & Housing to discuss a cooperative planning process; and
WHEREAS two Zoning Orders that were filed on April 17, 2003 under the
DI"'nn.ng lIC" ....n~+hb DI...........;,.,....O D~"...;..IO. p......-n.. Act ..h- "':_:-';-ro& "'u-:.'::__I
....., III .r. La ,,,,,. L .'" I IQlnli"~QI . .. ",-vel. . .,'C'l .l,lI I:i' IVIIIII~lC. I. IVI. 11I\;;IJJdl
Affairs & Housing effectively precluded the City of Pickering's and the Regional
Municipality of Durham's responsibility and jurisdiction for planning for almost
one-quarter of the geographical area of the City of Pickering; and
WHEREAS Section 2 of the Municipa/ Act, 2001, authorizes municipalities "to be
responsible and accountable governments with respect to matters within their
jurisdiction and each municipality is given powers and duties under..." the said
Act which powers and duties include "... fostering the current and future
economic, social and environmental well-being of the municipality..."; and
..../3
3
\4 ~ -4
WHEREAS the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing by his action on April
17,2003, effectively placed his government's interests above the stated intent of
the Municipal Act, 2001, and the interests of the constituents of the Corporation
of the City of Pickering; .
NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Corporation of the City of Pickering
hereby petitions the Legislative Assembly of the Province of Ontario to repeal the
two Zoning Orders filed by the Minister of Municipal Affairs as the City of
Pickering continues with its Growth Management Study in consultation with the
Province of Ontario, the Region of Durham, the TRCA and all interested
stakeholders in this planning process; and
FURTHER THAT the decisions of the City of Pickering continue to have the full
weight and authority of the Planning Act and the Municipa/ Act, 2001; and
FURTHER THAT these decisions be of full force and effect; and
FURTHER THAT this resolution be forwarded to:
. The Honourable Ernie Eves, Premier of Ontario
. Dalton McGuinty, Leader of the Opposition
. Howard Hampton, Leader of the New Democratic Party
. The Honourable Gary Carr, Speaker of the Legislative Assembly
FURTHER THAT copies of this resolution be forwarded to:
. The Association of Municipalities of Ontario
. All Ontario Municipalities
. GT A Task Force on Ontario Municipal Board Reform
CARRIED: (siQned) WAYNE ARTHURS
MAYOR
The Council of Oro-Medonte
c/o Councillor Don Bell
148 Line 7 South
Box 100, Oro, Ontario
LOL2XO
( Reeel
I MAY 9 2!IrI3
. OHU-IIIIC.UUN I ~
l.~_ TOWNS,",'t>
\L\~-\
- "1
(~'[)!, /jA/;J;
,-----.
(\ (\ I O,J\.......,
I~
! \)
s
iv~
May 6,2003.
Re: 220 Acres; Lot 4 and 3
Concession 7, Oro-Medonte
Dear Concillors:
As owner of the above property since 1989, I am deeply concerned about planning changes being
proposed according to the February 27th 2003 study; "Suggested Changes To Oro-Medonte
Official Plan." Although this study catalogues many of the features of the area, most have been
known to us for some time and have been dealt with very well by the existing planning people,
and by the many other existing regulatory bodies involved. Building permits are always required
for any construction let alone approval for any development or redevelopment
There is no doubt that we all want Oro-Medonte to retain its' character and appeal which is the
very reason we are all here in the first place. However putting a plan into play that is extremely
short on specific details and verified facts, but introduces such controversial terms as; sentive
areas, environmental impact, heritage features, and the much maligned word significant; etc.,etc,
can only lead to much confusion to both the municipal people and landowners alike.
The new "Oro Medonte Moraine" designation has opened up a complete new controversy in as
much as its exact location, function, size and the applied arbitrary percentages of "significance."
The added 500 metres ofland beyond the so called line for the moraine is totally without
justification. There has been no factual evidence what so ever presented to warrant a land freeze.
Vacant land does not look after itself in to days society It is continually abused by the public and
specifically prone to vandalism; trespass, garbage being dumped etc. etc. Instead of good
planning to promote good stewardship of properties, that would contribute to the tax base of the
municipality; there could be a tremendous liability being created on all taxpayers of Oro-Medonte
for policing, maintenance, insurance etc.
As a taxpayer I question the ongoing cost of such a vague and controversial study which I
understand was already $40,000.00 over budget this spring. It would appear that the document
continually repeats itself under different headings simply to full more pages.
\ l\f -- ~... ,
2.
My 220 acre property was purchased by me as a retirement investment at a considerable cost.
Although I would not seek approval for a 150 lot subdivison as has been approved and is now
under way immediately to the north of my property! I would however pursue something much
more modest which could be sold off over a period of time; enhance the existing land and provide
assessment and tax revenue for the municipality. I would hope to live on the property myself.
In closing, I seek to appear before a regular Council Meeting to explain my position and clarify
any points made in this letter.
Yours trul.Y, "~.<0j?-~-..' .
~'4 ,
p''''., .""
. ..; < /:>f/;/
/..//>{/~b7 /
-~"
/
i,./
Wm. Stankus
COULSON RIDGE ESTATES
c/o 4 ELSA DRIVE
GORMLEY) ON.
LOH lGO
905-726-3257
"
Neil Craig
Walter Dickie
Paul Martin
Ralph Hough
Hany Hughes
Ruth Fountain
cc.
Mayor
Deputy Mayor
Councillors
"
"
THE CORPORAl,ON OF THE TOWNSHIP OF $PRINGWATER
\
zJ
~
NOTICE OF THE ADOPTION OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN OF THE
TOWNSHIP OF SPRINGWATER
MERTZ OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDM~NrNO, 15
TAKE NOTICE that the Council of The Corporation of the Township of Springwater enacted By-law No. 2003-041 to
adopt Official Plan Amendment No. 15 of the Official Plan of the Township of Springwater, under Sections 17 and
21 of the PlannIng Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.P.13. as amended.
PRIOR TO the adoption of the Official PI;:in Amendment. a Public Meeting was held on March 24. 2003 to hear any
comments or CQncerns regarding the proposed Official Plan Amendment. The lands are also subject to applications
for Draft Plan of Subdivision under the County of Simcoe File No. 012 ME and Zoning By-law Amendment (former
Township of Madonte) under Springwater Township File D14 ME.
PURPOS~_A~P..Eff~~I
THE PURPOSE of the amendment is to redesignate approximately 5.63 hectares of land in Part of the North Haff Lot
56 and Part of the South Half lot 67, Concesslon.1, EPR, former Township of Medonte. now in the Township of
Sprlngwater, known municipally as 114 Scarlett line, A$se$sment Roll NO"4341 020 081 068010000 from Rural to
Urban Residential. The effect of the Amendment is td permit residential development.
FURTHER JfQ,nCf.,Q_B.hPP.~L
ANY PERSON OR AGENCY will be entitled to receive notice of the decision of the approval authority regarding
Official Plan Amendment No. 15 if a written request is made to:
County of Simcoe
Planning Dept.
Simcoe County Administration Centre
Midhursl. Ontario
LOL 1 XO
ONLY INDIVIDUALS, CORPORATIONS OR PUBLIC BODIES may appeal a decision of the County regarding the
Official Plan Amendment to the Ontario Municipal Board. A notice of apP~f,\1 may not be flied by an unincorporated
association or group. However, a notice of appeal may be filed in the name of an individual who is a member of the
association or the group on its behalf. .
THE KEY MAP on the reverse shows the lands affected by the Official Plan Amendment. The complete
Amendment is available for inspection at the Springwater Township Offices. lower East Wing, Simcoe County
Administration Centre. 1110 Highway 26. Midhurst, Ontario during regular office hours, Monday to Friday. 8:30 a.m. to
4:30 p.m. Please see attached. Please note that the Township Offices will be closed on Monday. May 19'^forVictoria
Day.
DATED AT THE TOWNSHIP OF SPRINGWATER ON MAY 7, 2003.
Eleanor J. Rath. Clerk, Township of Springwater.
Simcoe County Administration Centre,
MIDHURST, Ontario lOL 1XO
Telephone: (70S) 728-4784
e-mail:p.I!mnlng@springwater.Ga
web site: www.springwate~:f_@
'HI '*...L... ~ I ""',.. _ 1_ J wil.l
'/CI';QC?lcnl
~og~8 13r~3SVl dH :A8 lN3S
1
~
g
'u
c:
:J
(;> ,
~8' ~ iq
.D N Q!I.
1, ~~. ~'.
c..... a;
.0 U
~.a ~
...."0 &i
86 _
-:t V
NN
'4n~
0.- .
;z.-S ~ r
". "0 '.
~2
.. 1'1 .
;,.,. ~ .
tx:\"O . ...,
Q r:: t::
~ :<I,
<13~u
'u €it r:j
;;';;; c::
""-0 .1.1
Q,) s:: f" {j
-5= :::r:
~ 8 1(5
';;;N . ~
~~ ~
c6
;.
~
.. i'
004
~
>
~
;.pa AEDf$l~TW rRCI1
'1IlIW. . TO '!t6lITVTIOrW.'.
~~
a::
~
c.i
o
<!
...
u>
o
1.0
0>
..,.
0~
:z:il.,
8~
-
01)
11)
V
1.0
.
o
<!
ThIS IS ~ 'A' 10 0Ff10L
I't,N.I ~ Ii'l. TO T!if
a'fK:1AI. f'1..M ~ TIE TOMISIiIf' Of
SffiI ~ 'HATfR
1- ...----........-...""'.....1
~~~::.~..
SCHEDULE 'A-7'
HILLSDALE
OFFICIAL PLAN
LAND USE &: ROAD PLAN
en
m
:z:
-i
(D
-<
::r:
IJ
r
)>
en
m
:v
L
m
-i
U)
....L.
TOWNSHIP OF
SPR[NGWATER
lJ1
D
LEGEND
r-
..
I';~';' ;.;::iij UDOU' RE...nr.m..
_.,~.,;~~.t..~ ..~ ~1V'\L
c=J RURAL
~ ACRfCULTURAl
~=::::::::::::j OPEN SPACE
NATURAL IiERITAG€
r:-:-:iEt.'Iif<<)NYCNTN. ~OTEc:rION)
~CA1EOORY I
_.... c-, COHSlRNNT AND HAZARD
LN-IO$
~ GENERAL COt.uU:RCIAI.
~
t:.::.::..:.:..1N$TITUnONP.L
~ ItIOUSTR1AL
~ BUSINESS PAm;
"'"
D
lJ1
"'"
f\.)
a>
())
(!)
lJ1
"'"
~ Pf\'OV1NaAl HiGHWAY
- - - - AR1ERIAL ROAD
s::
)>
-<
"'"
.
~~
....- ... ... ~... ~
o
U)
-........-
=:-:-.-:-:..-.:::-==_ r f\.>
=:-..=::..----:...--::... --
..
.j::..
"'"
IJ
s::
l;:iOQOO_
""""" ~-;t"' ~
IJ
)>
Q
m
.j::..
"'"
AMENDMENT NO. 15
TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN
OF THE
TOWNSHIP OF SPRINGWATER
APRIL 22, 2003
I I Ie ~C1\7'<
!W~J~:?l ~O./.A~~
!LS698GLSOL
-)
!os~e 13r~3S~l dH :^8 lN3S
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SPRINGWATER
BY.LAW NO. 2003-041
BEING A BY-LAW TO ADOPT AN AMENDMENT TO THE
OFFICIAL PLAN OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SPRINGWATER
.
(OPA NO.15 - MERTZ HILL5DALE SUBDIVISION)
WHEREAS Section 22 of the PfannlngAct, R..S.O. 1990. c,P.13 as amende<1 provides
that may make a request to Council to amend its Official Plan;
AND WHEREAS the policies of the Springwatar Official Plan are approved and In force
and effect al this time:
AND WHEREAS Council has considered the request to amend the Official Plan in
regard to lands located wIthin Part of the North Half of Lot 56 and Part of the South Half
of Lot 57 Concession 1 East, formerly Township of Medonte. now in the Township of
Springwater. County of Simcoe, and known municipally as 114 Scar1et1 Line, Property
Roll No. 43 41020081068010000.
AND WHEREAS Section 21 of the Planning Act. R..S.O. 1990. cP.13. as emended
provides that Council may amend Its Official Plan:
AND WHEREAS the Council of The Corporation of the Township of Sprlngwater deems
it desirabk3 to adopt an amendment to tha Official Plan of the Township of Springwater;
NOW THEREFORE the Council of The Corporation of the Township of Springwater
enacts as follows:
1. THAT the attached explanatory text and Schedule "A" which constitutes Amendment
No. 15 to the Official Plan for the Township of SprlngW8ter Is hereby adopted.
2. THAT the Clerk i$ hereby authorized and directed to make applloation to the County
of Simcoe for approval of the aforementioned Amendment No. 15 to the Official Plan
for the Township of Springwater.
3. THAT this By-law shall come into force and take effect In accordance with the
provisions of the Planning Act. R,S.O. 1990. c.P.13. as amended.
READ A FIRST, SECOND AND THIRD TIME AND FINAllY PASSED THIS 22ND DAY
OF APRil, 2003
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SPR'NGWATER
, (:>' /7
,'. ~<~~i~':~~'NLE~TTS
.-te9_~~JL
CLERK ANOR J. RATH
t.ERIIElCA~
CGl11fied that the above is a true copy of By-l<1w No. 2003-041 as enacted and passed
by Council of the Township of Springwater on the 22"" day of April, 2003.
.
CLERK ELEANOR J. RATH
Hie :J9\1'd
!~dLv:c~ 80'L'A\1'~
!LS69ScLSOL
!OS~8 l:Jr~:J$\1'l dH :A8 IN:J$
AMENDMENT NO.15 TO THE
OfFICIAL PLAN FOR THE
TOWNSHIP OF SPRINGWA TER
The attached explanatory text and Schedule "An constituting Amendment No. 15 to the Official
Plan for the Township of Springwater. was prepared and adopted by the Council of The
Corporation of the Township of Springwater by By-law No. 2003-041 in accordance with the
provisions of Sections 17 and 22 of the Planning Act. R.S.O. 1990, as amended.
~/L:~
MAYOR HELEN E. tOUTTS
~~~~RATH
CORPORATE SEAL
OF MUNICIPALITY
'fJll I/""'LL... "':) I t""\f"'\ ~ , _ 1 wlAI
~JC:F\qQ?Jc;()1
!OSfe 13r~3SVl dH :A8 lN3S
THE CONSTITUTIONAL STATEMENT
The following Amendment to the Official Plan for the Township of Springwater consists of three
parts.
PART A-THE PREAMBLE
Consists of the purpose, location and basis for the
Amendment and does not constitute part of the actual
Amendment.
PART B . THE AMENDMENT
Consisting of the following text and Schedule "A",
constitute Amendment NO.15 to the Official Plan of
the Township of Springwater.
PART C - THE APPENDICES
Consists ofthe background information and planning
considerations associated with this Amendment. This
section does not constitute part of the actual
Amendment.
1
n/e 38'i1d
~~det:'f 80'L'^'i1~
~LS6ge'LSOL
~OSf8 13r~3S'i1l dH :A8 lN3S
PART A - THE PREAMBLE
1.0 PURPOSE
The purpose of this Official Plan Amendment is to redesignate 5.63 hectares of land within the
Settlement Area of HiIIsdale from the Rural to Urban Residential designation, as shown on
Schedule "A" of this Amendment.
2.0 LOCATION
The subject land is situated on the west side of Scarlett line (which is the easter1y boundary of the
Municipality and also the Hillsdale Settlement Area) betvlleen Scar1ett Line and the easterly edge of
the Sturgeon River Valley environmentally sensitive area. The north boundary of the subject land is
also coincident with the north limit of the Hinsdale SettlemeX'It Area boundary.
3.0 BASIS
The subject land is bordered on the north, east and south by more than 25 existing homes on
estate sized Jots, and fits within the Official Plan description of "a limited amount of residential
inti/! type development" Section 8.5.1.2. Technical studies dealingwith soils. groundwater.
environmental impact. floodplain. servicing feasibility including stormwater management all
indicate that the subject land can properly support the urban residential land use enabled by the
amendment. The proposed development will be serviced by Township communal piped water
and individual Class 4 sewage systems.
The effect of the Urban Residential designation would be to allow for the approval of a draft Plan
of Subdivision. A number of policies in the Official Plan offer support for the re-designation of
the subject property from Rural to Urban Residential. These are as follows:
8.5 HILLSDALE SETTMENT AREA
"8.5.1.2 This Hillsdale Settlement Area is generally recognized as having a medium
settlement potantiaf. Future dave/opmentof the community during the planning
period should primarily consist of the development of existing approved rasidential
subdivisions within the community limits and. the approval of a limited amount of
residential, infill type development.1f
"8.5.1.3 Future residenUal development in the community is anticipated to occur through the
development of those areas so designated between the Old PenetanguiShene Road
right-of~way on the west and Panetanguishene Road (Hwy. 93) on the east. In terms
of the furure projected growth of the Municipality, it is not anticipated that significant
addn;onal lands will be designated for growth. If it becomes evident that at least a
portion of the exisUng approved dave/opment is not going to proceed within a
reasonable time frame, consideraUon may be given to permitting d&velopmenf in
other areas of the community if the proposed area and development can be
demonstrated to be suitable and appropriate for the intended usa. "
Policy 8.5.1.3 was written in 1996 in the belief that the "existing approved development" west of
Hwy. 93 would adequately provide for growth In HiIIsdale throughout the 20 year planning period
to 2016. Growth pressures in the County however will have exhausted the HiIIsdale vacant lot
supply within a year or two, and other existing designated in-fill land in Hillsdale has not
2
. , ,- -.....---..!
CiA, ,,'>....? I C'n./- A'tfV,1
~ I C;figeu SOL
~OS~8 13r~3SVl dH :A8 lN3S
proceeded to development. Re-designation of the subject land is therefore consistent with the
growth policies of the Official Plan.
Three additional policies in the Springwater Official Plan dealing with supplemental studies are
as follows:
"3.2
Prior to the consideration of any development proposal, Council may undertake
or direct to be undertaken, planning studies to ensure that the objectives of this
Plan are met. Such studies may include the ecological, social and economic
impact on residents of the . Township, natural resource impacts including
stormwater management, delineation of internal road patterns, distribution of
housing types, location of schools including capacity of schools and ability to
accommodate additional pupils, parks, and other community uses, shopping
facilities, pedestrian walkways, buffer strips, noise implications, consideration of
urban and landscape design concepts; and effecton the municipal tax base."
"4.7.3.4
Proposals for development of more than five lots within an existing partially serviced
settlement area boundary must be accompanied by a servicing feasibility study and
a settlement capability study the extent of which witl be sufficient to address the size,
scope, and circumstance of the proposed development. "
Prior to the approval of any additional subdivision plans, a Community Plan will
be required. Supplementary studies, among other matters deemed necessary by
the Municipality, should (if applicable) include a delineation of the westerly
boundary of the Copeland Forest Wetland Complex and/or the northerly
boundary of the Copeland Forest Significant Biological Area and/or an
Environmental Impact Study for areas situated adjacent to environmentally
sensitive lands if deemed necessary by the Township andlor commenting
agencies, a Master Drainage Plan, Functional Servicing Report, Archaeological
Review, Hydrogeological Investigation, and Transportation Study. "
Required studies have been completed by the applicant as follows:
"8.5.1.4
Hillsdale Environmental Impact Study, by ESG Internationallnc, February 2002.
The ESG study concludes "The proposal was developed proactively to respect ecologically
sound functional and spatial setbacks from the sensitive, high quality features of the Sturgeon
River system and its associated wetland and woodland habitats. Our analyses. combined with a
detailed review of provincial and municipal policies indicates that no immitigable effects will
result. "
Floodline Mapping Study for the Mertz ProPB!!Y,,,9n the Sturgeon River, by Schaeffers &
Associates Ltd. December 1999.
The critical result of the Schaeffer study is the delineation of the regional flood line which is
accumtely shown on the draft plan. and is remote from the limits of the plan.
Geotechnical Investigation by Peto MacCallum Ltd, March 1999.
Peto MacCallum Ltd. excavated 15 test pits, (one on each lot in leaching bed area) recorded
groundwater, collected samples and ana lysed soils for purposes of advising design details on
leaching beds. Soils are generally suitable, but partially raised beds will be necessary to clear
seasonally high groundwater.
3
nlOf 3D'1d
~~d8v:Gf EO'L'^'1~
~L5698GL50L
~05fE 13r~3S'1l dH :A8 lN3S
Hydrogeol9gicallnvestigation, by Anderson Geologic Limited, February 2002.
The hydrogeological investigation drew the following conclusions regarding the potential for
impact to groundwater and surface water quality:
1 . No detrimental water quality impact to shallow groundwater is predicted.
2. No detrimental water quality impact to the Sturgeon River is predicted.
3. No detrimental nitrate impact to deep groundwater resources is predicted, in particular to
local water supply wells such as Hillsdale well PW2 (located adja~nt to the north limit of
the draft plan).
Preliminary Servicing Fea~i9[lity Study & Settlement C1?pability Study, by R. J. Burnside &
Associates Ltd.. March 2002;
The Burnside study concludes that the proposed development can be serviced by the existing
municipal water system and individual sewage disposal systems; there will be no adverse
impact on existing local roads; stormwater can be appropriately managed, and that all other
utilities and services can reasonably be provided.
Planning Reportf9r the Mer1z Scarlet Line Suttqb!L~!Q!1, by Mel Code, Consultant, April 2002
The Planning Report concludes that all of the community planning, environmental, servicing and
urban design issues required to be addressed by the Township of Springwater Official Plan
policies have been satisfied by the studies represented by the six reports submitted with the
application.
An Archaeological Assessment remains to be undertaken. The Ministry of Culture has proposed
a condition of draft approval that will require the assessment be completed and approved prior to
any construction activities on the subject land.
4
, I r""'~tin? I C':ill
~09~8 13r83S~1 dH :^9 lN3S
PART B - THE AMENDMENT
1.0 DETAilS OF THE AMENDMENT:
The Official Plan is amended as follows:
1. Schedule "A-7" - land Use and Road Plan of the Township of Springwater is hereby
amended by re-designation of:
Approximately 5.63 hectares of Rural land to Urban ReSidential as shown on Schedule
"An of the Amendment.
2.0 IMPLEMENTATION
Subsequent to the adoption of this Amendment, Council will pass a Zoning By-law Amendment
as It relates to the subject land by rezoning these lands to appropriate zones to implement the
draft plan.
3.0 INTERPRETATION
The provisions of the Official Plan as amended from time to time shall apply in regard to this
Amend ment.
5
J l!? l ~m1...j
~W~A~:?L 80-I-Avn
~LS6ge(:LSOL
~OS~8 13r~3S~l dH :A8 lN3S
.\:
c:.
-<
'"
:;,
13
I::
S .
u,..,
>>8
~ r..a
" -"
~ '6-
~::
"':0
g~
'"Q
('("1...::1
8-
N~
. '"
o '=
;z-::.
~i3
"'-
.. u
;... ~.
~-g ~-
- <':
< ~ ""u c
. c: ,
11 Ui ,'~
:; ':;' ~; B
13 -g ~';;:;
-{; os :r:
~g~~
'" N ~
:a N :2-
;....N
NIfA RED€SJGHATfD fR(H
'RUAAl' .0 '1IISTIf~'.
~
i
~~
~
~
r.1
.:0
o
.c
(I>
...
.~
!ip.;
air:
u
0()
oP
'I<t
to
.
<.::>
<(
THJS is SQEDU..E 'A' 10 OfFICAL
f'\A'4 ~ N<>. TO TH"
0fF1C1.AI.- p~ a= THE TO'tt1iStiIP OF
S/'RIHI.iWA 1fR
,-' "'''''"''.......---...'''''''''''''1
~r~~~:.~..
SCHEDULE 'A-7'
HlllSOALE
OFFICIAL PLAN
LAND USE & ROAD PLAN
TOWNSHIP OF ......
SPRINGWATER _
(f)
m
~
CD
-<
::r:
-u
r
)>
(f)
m
::D
L
m
-i
c.>
~
LEGEND
U1
D
I"-
..
I~~~::~!;;'~ lIRBA.N RE'5WENTIA.l
CJ RUM-
~ ALJRK;.ULTUflAl
~:::::'::.::'::.::::j OPEN SPACE
NATURAl. HfRJlP.Gf
r:-::-:YtMl1RONliENT AI. PROTECT ION)
~(;.ItITOOR'i I
[
I' w."_~..~ CONSTf?AJHT AND HAZARD
lANC5
~GENERAL COMMERCJ,At
! 1:-: -: . :- : J INSTfTIJ flONAL
~ INDl.J<:;mlAl
~ BUSINESS PARI<
-..J
o
tr
'"
I\.:
a::
0:
u:
lJ
...
=GI= PROvtNOAL HiGHWAY
- - - - ARTERIA!.. ROAD
'"
j
~
(
c
-...............
-"'---_.....
---.-......-----
-....-.....--.- -
--.....-----
'-20000
K-'<E fJi-;-~~
-
\L\
\
_I
\
APPENDIX 1
Technical Background Report
c,.. .____. _" , 1--.,,1111
'ICO:::QQ;:>/cnJ
~O~~8 13r83SVl dH :A8 lN3S
APPENDIX 2
NotIces and Minutes of Public Meetings
Minutes of Public Meetings
f 1.-t::'t""JO~/Cnl
~OSf8 13r~3S~l dH :A8 lN3S
Ilia I ::mw,.j
APPENDIX 3
Correspondence Received in Response to Notices of Public Meetings
~Wrln~:?L ~O-I-A~~
~LS698C:LSOL
~OS~~ 13r~3S~1 dH :A8 IN3S
\\.\
APPENDIX 4
Excerpts from Minutes
Sprlngwater Planning Committee
Springwater Council
, ~ -,....1""\1"'\'" I r-Ii 1
~OG~€ 13r~3SVl dH :^8 lN3S
\.,-
Ministry of Citizenship
Minister
6th Floor
400 University Avenue
Toronto ON M7A 2R9
Tel.: (416) 325-6200
Fax: (416) 325-6195
Ministere des Affaires civiques
Ministre
6& etage
400, avenue University
Toronto ON M7A 2R9
Tel.: (416) 325-6200
Telae. : (416) 325.6195
! RECflUfll ii
NAY 1 8 'lOO3 !
Otw-.~TEJ
~H'P .
May 2003
Dear Mayor and Members of Council:
I&l
~y;
Ontario
Each year the Government Ontario designates June as Seniors' Month to celebrate the countless
experiences, accomplishments and contributions of seniors. Across the province, community
organizations and local governments host special events to recognize seniors and the countless
. contributions they make to Ontario's way of life.
It is with great pleasure that we invite you to participate in the 2003 Senior of the Year Awards.
This award was established in 1994 to give each municipality in Ontario the opportunity to
honour one outstanding local senior.
Recipients are individuals, who after age 65, have enriched the social, cultural or civic life of the
community, without thought of personal or financial gain. The certificate, provided by the
Ontario Government, is signed by: the Honourable James K. Bartleman, Lieutenant Governor;
the Honourable Carl DeFaria, Minister of Citizenship and Minister Responsible for Seniors; and
the local Head of Council.
The Government of Ontario is proud to offer this important initiative. You may wish to consider
involving local MPPs in your selection process or presentation ceremony.
Please fax the name of your municipality's Senior of the Year Award recipient, on the attached
fonn by June 30, 2003.
,.:sg ~ ~
For additional infonnation, please contact the Ontario Honours and Awards office of the
Ministry of Citizenship at (416) 314-7526.
Ontario's seniors deserve special recognition for their outstanding accomplishments. By working
together with municipalities, we can ensure they are honoured in a meaningful way.
Sincerely,
~t;,*
- ~
Carl DeFaria
Minister Responsible for Seniors
10-107
t:!~
fJA1.
~ , @ Ontario
67~ 0/. tIw ea/Jl
Award 2003
t40minating MunicipalitylTownship
(please print municipality name in full as this will be transcribed onto recipient's certificate):
......................................................n......................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Contact Name:
.....u..u....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Address:
.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
~.(tt.f.IS?~.:..........................................................................P.r.2~dQ~~;...........................................................p.?!?!9.!..~9.g~.:...........................................................
I~.I.~p..b.2Q~:........................................................................f.~~:.................................................................................................................................................................
~.~.~~.~O!~~.!P~.~~~.JI]J~~~..g~..9.~..y.~9.f.?.gf..9.8.~.gf..9.!g.~O.:....................................................................................................................................
I~!!..~~..9E!.~f.IY...9.9.9..~~..Y.2~.f..f.~s:.!p.(~QL......................................................................................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................00.................................................................................................... ....................................00........................ .
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
................................................u................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................00.......................................
.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Completed form must be received by Monday, June 30, 2003
Mail or Fax to: Ontario Honours and Awards, Ministry of Citizenship, 400 University Avenue, 2nd Floor
Toronto, Ontario M7A 2R9 Tel.: (416) 314-7526 Fax: (416) 314--6050
Personal information on this form is collected under the authority of the Ministry of Citizenship and Culture Act, R.S.O. 1990. cM.18, sA and will be
used to determine eligibility and notify recipients of the Senior of the Year Award. For further information, please contact the Manager, Ontario
Honours and Awards, 400 University Avenue, 2nd Floor, Toronto ON M7A 2R9, (416) 314-7523.
\f . \
\!jiG, - \
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
BY -LA W NO. 2003-43
A BY -LA W TO ADOPT THE ESTIMATES OF ALL AMOUNTS REQUIRED DURING
THE YEAR AND FOR LEVYING THE TAX RA TES FOR THE YEAR 2003.
WHEREAS Section 290 of the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c.25, as amended, authorizes the
Council of a local municipality to prepare and adopt estimates of all amounts required during the
year;
AND WHEREAS Section 312 of the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O.2001, c.25, as amended, authorizes
the Council of a local municipality to pass a by-law levying a separate tax rate, as specified in the by-
law, on the assessment in each property class in the local municipality rateable for local municipality
purposes;
AND WHEREAS the County of Simcoe has established by by-law the following tax ratios for the
year 2003:
ResidentiallFarm
Multi-Residential
Commercial
Industrial
Pipelines
Farmlands
Managed Forests
1.0000
1.9461
1.1877
1.7967
1.1464
0.2500
0.2500
and the County tax rates for the year 2003.
AND WHEREAS Ontario Regulation 74/03 establishes the Education tax rates for the year 2003;
AND WHEREAS Section 329 of the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c.25, as amended establishes
limitations on the taxes for the commercial, industrial and multi-residential classes;
AND WHEREAS Section 391 of the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c.25, as amended, authorizes
a municipality to pass by-laws imposing fees or charges for services provided by it;
AND WHEREAS The Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte established by by-law waste
management charges for the year 2003;
NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte enacts as
follows:
1. That the estimates of Expenditures required during the year 2003 for the purposes of the
municipality shall be adopted as follows:
General Government
Fire and Emergency
Police
Building, By-Law and Planning
Public Works
Street Lighting
Water Works Systems
County Waste Management
Arena, Parks and Recreation, and Economic Dev.
$ 2,083,026
1,210,246
1,402,119
925,986
4,478,873
66,977
1,669,446
1,034,000
1,225,070
Total estimated Expenditures for
Local purposes
$14,095,743
2
,\ "
\ \.J1 C\ - d--
2. That the estimates of Revenue required during the year 2003 for the purposes of the
municipality shall be adopted as foHows:
Contributions from other Governments
Other Revenues
Special Charges on Property
Other Taxation Revenue
$ 250,085
5,838,909
1,031,916
142,910
Total estimated Revenues, other than taxation
$ 7,263,820
3. That the following amounts shall be raised by taxation within the Township of Oro-Medonte
in the year 2003:
Township General Purposes
County Purposes
School Board Purposes
$ 6,831,923
5,696,234
7,797,707
Total Tax Levy
$20,325,864
4. That the Tax Rates shown on Schedule "A" attached hereto and forming part of this By-law
shall be levied upon and collected from the whole of the assessment for real property, in
accordance with the last returned Assessment Roll for the Township of Oro-Medonte.
5. That in addition to the foregoing the following Special Charges and Collectables be levied
and collected:
(a) A levy for the purposes of recovering amounts advanced under the provisions of the
Tile Drainage Act, Chapter T.8, R.S.O. 1990, as amended, from benefitting properties.
(b) A special levy to collect for the annual estimates for the following Street Lighting Areas
apportioned on a flat rate basis to the benefitting properties:
Street Lighting Areas
Flat Rate
per Property
Hawkestone
$ 40.00
$ 20.00
Shanty Bay
Sugarbush, Plan M-367, Plan M-368
Oro Hills, Plan M324
Horseshoe Highlands, Plan M391, M447, M456
$ 29.00
$ 28.00
$ 28.00
Beechwood Crescent, Plan M-281
Georgina, Plan M 1561
Warminster, Plan M92, M 1 04
$ 32.00
$ 86.00
$ 30.00
Black Forest Estates, Plan M-191
Canterbury, Plan M-343
Harbourwood, Plan M-118
$ 58.00
$ 30.00
$ 15.00
Parkside Drive, Plan 875
Mount St. Louis Estates, Plan M-112
Day Subdivision, Plan M-162
$ 18.00
$ 56.00
$ 86.00
Conder Drive, RP51R624, RP51R2163
Pritchard Subdivision, Plan 1626
Snowshoe Trail, Plan M-174
$ 15.00
$ 5.00
$ 56.00
Robin Crest Subdivision, Plan M-101, Plan M-123
Cairns Estates, Plan 1676
$ 56.00
$ 56.00
\ll/q -)
3
Kade Meadows, Plan M-340, Plan M-469
Forest Glen, Plan M-264
$ 56.00
$ 30.00
Craighurst Estates, Plan M51 0
Windfield Estates
Sprucewood Plan M535
Heights of Medonte
$ 28.00
$ 89.00
$110.00
$ 38.00
Lakewood Subdivision, Plan M-381
Forest Home Industrial Park, Plan 1719, Plan 1720
Simoro
Winfull
White Bros., Plan M593
$ 20.00
$ 75.00
$ 38.00
$ 38.00
$ 56.00
(c) A special levy to collect for the annual estimates for County Waste Management
apportioned on a flat rate basis per user:
Flat Rate
per User
Residential
Commercial, garbage collection,
disposal & recycling
Commercial, recycling only
$ 120.00
$ 120.00
$ 35.00
(d) An adjustment to taxes for the commercial, industrial and multi-residential classes as
determined in accordance with Section 329 of the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001,
c.25, as amended.
(e) A levy for any or all other amounts collectable pursuant to any statute or by-law and
chargeable to any or all real property and business and/or person or persons to be raised
in the same manner and at the same time as all other levies, rates, charges and/or
collections.
6. That the final tax bill less the interim tax bill be due and payable in two equal installments on
or before Thursday, July 31, 2003 and Tuesday, September 30, 2003.
7. The Treasurer is hereby authorized to mail or cause to be mailed the notice of taxes due to the
address of the residence or place of business of the person to whom such notice is required to
be given as shown on the latest revised Assessment Roll.
8. A penalty for non-payment of taxes shall be imposed not exceeding 114% on the first day of
default, and on the first day of each calendar month thereafter during the year 2003, until the
taxes are paid.
9. That there be added an interest charge of n4% on the first day of each month on any
outstanding tax arrears from the 3151 day of December in the year in which the taxes were
levied until the taxes are paid.
10. That taxes may be paid either in full or by installments for remittance payments to the credit
of the Treasurer on or before the day on which such taxes fall due, at most financial .
institutions, which accept and process payments on behalf of customers, with the onus on the
financial institution to remit payments on time.
II. That all taxes be paid into the Office of the Treasurer.
12. That the Treasurer be authorized and directed to collect any penalty or interest or any other
levies, rates, charges or collections in the same manner as empowered to collect taxes levied
by the Council.
13. That the Treasurer be authorized to accept part payment from time to time on account of any
taxes due and to give a receipt for such part payment provided that acceptance of any such
payment does not affect the collection of any penalty or interest or any other levies, rates,
charges or collections imposed, collectable and due in respect to any non-payment.
4
\ \.oc\ - y
14. That this by-Jaw come into force and take effect on and from the date of the final passing
thereof for the current year 2003.
Read a first and second time this 21st day of May, 2003.
By-law read a third time and finally passed this 21 st day of May, 2003.
THE CORPORA nON OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
Mayor, 1. Neil Craig
Clerk, Marilyn Pennycook
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
2003 TAX RATES
SCHEDULE A .
BY-LAW NO.2003-43
PROPERTY CLASS TOWNSHIP COUNTY EDUCATION TOTAL TAX RATE
Residential/Farm 0.3766110/0 0.3140060/0 0.3350000/0 1.0256170/0
Multi-Residential 0.7329230/0 0.6110870/0 0.3350000/0 1.6790100/0
Commercial Occupied 0.4473010/0 0.3729450/0 1.9507110/0 2.7709570/0
Commercial Vacant 0.3131110/0 0.2610640/0 1.3654970/0 1 .9396720/0
Industrial Occupied 0.6766570/0 0.5641740/0 3.0095790/0 4.25041 00/0
Industrial Vacant 0.4398270/0 0.3667270/0 1 .9562260/0 2.7627800/0
Pipelines 0.4317470/0 0.3599760/0 1 .8182300/0 2.6099530/0
Farmlands 0.0941530/0 0.0785010/0 0.0837500/0 0.2564040/0
Managed Forest 0.0941530/0 0.0785010/0 0.0837500/0 0.2564040/0
NOTE: Vacant includes vacant land and vacant units/excess land
Commercial class includes parking lots, shopping centres and commercial offices
Industrial class includes large industrial
~
C
P
i
{)I
. 'I
[ lob
CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
BY -LAW NO. 2003-045
Being a By-Law to amend By-law No. 2002-141, being a By-law to Appoint By-Law
Inspectors
WHEREAS the Municipal Act, 5.0. 2001, c. 25, Section 115(1) authorizes a municipality
to pass a by-law to prohibit or regulate the smoking of tobacco in public places and
workplaces within the municipality;
AND WHEREAS the Municipal Act, 5.0. 2001, c. 25, Section 115(7), Chap. M.45, as
amended, authorizes a municipality to enter a premises to which the by-law to regulate
the smoking of tobacco applies;
AND WHEREAS Council of the Township of Oro-Medonte did enact By-law No. 2002-
115, being a By-law Respecting Smoking in Public Places in the Township of Oro-
Medonte on November 6, 2002;
AND WHEREAS Council of the Township of Ora-Medonte did enact By-law No. 2003-
035, being a By-law Respecting Smoking in Workplaces in the Township of Ora-
Medonte on May 7,2003;
AND WHEREAS the Council of the Township of Oro-Medonte did on the 18th day of
December, 2002 enter into an agreement with the Simcoe County Health Unit to
appoint inspectors for the purpose of enforcing By-law No. 2002-115 of the Corporation
of the Township of Oro-Medonte, being a by-law to regulate smoking in public places;
AND WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte
deems it expedient to amend By-law No. 2002-141 to provide for the appointment of
inspectors (Simcoe District Health Unit) to enforce By-law No. 2003-035 to regulate
smoking in workplaces;
NOW THEREFORE, Council of The Corporation of Oro-Medonte enacts as follows:
1. That Section 1 of By-law No. 2002-141 be amended to add:
"....and the "Workplaces" By-law No. 2003-035".
2. That Section 2 of By-law No. 2002-141 be amended to add:
"...and as provided for in By-law No. 2003-035."
3. That this By-law shall come into force and take effect on the passing thereof.
By-law read a first and second time this 21st day of May, 2003.
By-law read a third time and finally passed this day of
2003.
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
Mayor, J. Neil Craig
Clerk, Marilyn Pennycook
lloc...-\
,
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
BY -LAW NO. 2003-046
Being a By-law to Authorize the Execution of a Subdivision Agreement
between The Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte
and Terra Ridge Developments Inc.
WHEREAS, Section 51, Subsection (26) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter
P .13, as amended, provides that municipalities may enter into agreements imposed as
a condition to the approval of a plan of subdivision and such agreements may be
registered against the land to which the subdivision plan applies being Part of the Eat
Half of Lot 14, Concession 1, Designated as Parts 1, 3,4, 5 and 6, Plan 51 R-22770,
Save and Except Parts 1,2 and 3, Plan 51 R-30901, being all of PIN#58544-0115(Lt),
Township of Oro-Medonte, County of Simcoe.
AND WHEREAS the Township of Oro-Medonte did enter into a Pre-Servicing
Agreement with Terra Ridge Developments Inc. in September 2002;
NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Township of Oro-Medonte hereby enacts as
follows:
1. That the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized to execute, on behalf of the
Township of Oro-Medonte, a Subdivision Agreement, a copy of which is
attached hereto and forms part of this By-law as Schedule 'A'.
2. That the Subdivision Agreement, a copy of which is attached hereto and forms
part of this By-law as Schedule 'An, be registered on title against the lands
described therein;
3. That the Township of Oro-Medonte shall be entitled to enforce the provisions of
the Subdivision Agreement against the owners and any and all subsequent
owners of the land;
3. That this By-Law shall come into force and take effect on the final passing
thereof.
By-Law read a first and second time this 21st day of May, 2003.
By-Law read a third time and finally passed this
day of
,2003.
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
Mayor, J. Neil Craig
Clerk, Marilyn Pennycook
.. ~...1
llo
Schedule "A" to
By-law No. 2003-046
SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT
- between -
TERRA RIDGE DEVELOPMENTS INC.
- and -
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO - MEDONTE
DESCRIPTION OF LANDS
Part of the East Half of Lot 14, Concession 1,
Designated as Parts 1, 3, 4, 5 and 6, Plan 51 R-22770
Save and Except Parts 1, 2 and 3, Plan 51 R-30901
Being all of PIN #58544-0115 (Lt)
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
COUNTY OF SIMCOE
April, 2003
By-Law No.
..
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Part 1
General Requirements
Part 2
Lands, Plans and Representations
Part 3
Requirements Prior to Execution of Agreement
Part 4
Pre-Construction Requirements
Part 5
Financial Requirements
Part 6
Staging or Phasing
Part 7
Construction Requirements
Part 8
Building Permits and Occupancy
Part 9
Maintenance and Acceptance
Part 10
Default Provisions
SCHEDULES
Schedule "A" - Description of Lands Being Subdivided
Schedule "B" - Plan of Subdivision
Schedule "C" - Works to be Constructed
Schedule "0" - Itemized Estimate of Cost of Construction of Each
Part of the Works
Schedule "E" - List of Lots Unsuitable for Building Purposes
and/or Requiring Special Attention
Schedule "F" - Development Charges
Schedule "G" Deeds and Easements to be Conveyed
Schedule "H" - Parkland
Schedule "I" Declaration of Progress and Completion
Schedule "J" General Location and Lot Grading Plans
Schedule uK" - Standard Township Letter of Credit
2
{I
\
\
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
THIS AGREEMENT made as of the
day of
,2003.
BETWEEN:
TERRA RIDGE DEVELOPMENTS INC.
(hereinafter called the "Developer")
OF THE FIRST PART
AND:
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
(hereinafter called the "Township")
OF THE SECOND PART
WHEREAS the lands affected by this Agreement are the lands described in Schedule
"A" hereto annexed, and are also shown on the Plan of Subdivision attached to and
forming part of this Agreement as Schedule "B" and collectively are herein referred to as
the "said lands";
AND WHEREAS a Draft Plan with Conditions (43T-90051) has been issued for the
proposed subdivision, which requires that the Developer must satisfy all the
requirements financial and otherwise of the Township, including the provisions of certain
Municipal Services;
NOW THEREFORE THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSETH that in consideration of the
premises and for other good and valuable consideration and the sum of Two Dollars
($2.00) of lawful money of Canada now paid by the Township to the Developer (the
receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged), THE DEVELOPER AND THE TOWNSHIP
HEREBY COVENANT AND AGREE WITH ONE ANOTHER AS FOLLOWS:
3
"
PART-1
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
1.1 DEVELOPER'S CONSULTING ENGINEERS
The Developer shall employ Engineers registered and in good standing with the
Association of Professional Engineers of Ontario:
1.1.1
1.1.2
1.1.3
1.1.4
1.1.5
1.1.6
1.1.7
1.1.8
1.1.9
1.1.10
To prepare designs in accordance with the Township of Oro-
Medonte Engineering Standards and Drawings (dated October.
1997).
To prepare and furnish all required drawings and specifications.
To prepare the necessary contract(s) and provide contract
administration.
To obtain the necessary approvals in conjunction with the
Township, from the Township of Oro-Medonte sewage approval
authority, Simcoe County District School Board and Simcoe
Muskoka Catholic District School Board, the Ministry of Natural
Resources, Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority, and utility
companies, or as a result of legislative or procedural change, the
Ministries shall be deemed to be the Ministry of Municipal Affairs
and Housing, as well as the Council of the Township of Oro-
Medonte or the Chief Building Official. This will also pertain to
Sections 2.4.3, 3.1.11, 8.1 and 8.2.
To act as the Developer's representative in all matters pertaining to
the subdivision.
To provide co-ordination in scheduling to comply with the timing
provisions of this Agreement and the requirements of the Township
Engineer, for all the work specified in this Agreement.
To provide supervision during construction of all the services.
To ensure that the work involved in construction of the services is
carried out by construction methods conforming to acceptable
engineering practice.
To maintain records of construction which shall be available for
inspection or copy by the Township.
To prepare final "as constructed" Mylar drawings which will include
the following with regard to provision of a digital Plan of
Subdivision:
Completed digital Plan of Subdivisions must be in AutoCAD 12
drawing format or DXF and be delivered on a 1.44 MB floppy
diskette. Two copies of each Plan of Subdivision are required on
separate diskettes.
Each diskette must be labeled identifying the legal property
description, developer's name, file name, and date delivered.
PKZIP Release 2.04G may be used to perform file compression if
required.
4
"
1.1.11
1.1.12
It is the Developer's responsibility to ensure that all drawing
changes occurring throughout the approval process are
incorporated into the digital submission,
All line data depicting property boundaries must be mathematically
closed to form polygons.
The lines, which describe the boundary of all properties created
within the Plan of Subdivision, will be isolated on a unique
layer/level. In certain cases, some of the line segments will
coincide with the location of concession lot lines, registered plan
data, open roads, rivers, and lakes.
PLAN OF SUB layer/level will outline the property boundaries in the
form of enclosed polygons.
LA YERlLEVEL PLAN OF SUB
LINE TYPE CONTINUOUS
COLOUR YELLOW (2)
The text, which describes the property lot numbers for the Plan of
Subdivision, will be isolated on a unique layer/level. The lot number
will be inserted as descriptive text.
LA YERlLEVEL PL LTTEXT
FONT MONOTEXT
COLOUR YELLOW (2)
The digital files should contain enough site data as to allow for
horizontal and vertical positioning within the existing base mapping.
A minimum of two road intersections located outside the Plan of
Subdivision must be shown in the drawing.
It is not necessary that the digital data be in Universal Transverse
Mercator (UTM) co-ordinates since the registration process will
automatically convert any unit grid to the Ontario Base Mapping
UTM Co-ordinate System".
To furnish the Township with a certificate with respect to each lot or
building block for which a Building Permit application is made,
certifying that the proposed construction is in conformity with the
General Location and Lot Grading Plan or with an approved
variation; (NOTE: That a Professional Engineer could also be
retained to provide the aforementioned and any cost incurred by the
Township will be the responsibility of the Developer or individual lot
owner).
To prepare and provide the Township, for each lot or block within
the plan, a certificate of final grade elevation, indicating that the
property has been developed in conformity with the General
Location and Lot Grading Plan or with an approved variation
(NOTE: That a Professional Engineer could also be retained to
provide the afore-mentioned and any costs incurred by the
Township will be the responsibility of the Developer or individual lot
owner).
5
"
NOTE: In the case of lots built on after the sale or transfer by the Developer, the
Township reserves the right to request a similar certificate as required under
1.1,11 and 1.1.12, but it may be provided by a Professional Engineer, other than
the Developer's Consulting Engineer. If the Township has their Engineer prepare
the Certificate, the cost of the work will be deducted from the final occupancy and
lot grading deposit and will become the responsibility of the individual lot owner.
1.2 LEGAL NOTICE TO DEVELOPER
Any notice required to be given hereunder may be given by registered mail
addressed to the Developer at his principal place of business and shall be
effective as of the date of the deposit thereof in the post office, as follows:
514 Welham Road
BARRIE, Ontario
L4N 822
In which case, notice shall be effective as of the time and date of successful
transmission thereof.
The Developer shall be responsible for notifying the Township Clerk, in writing, of
any change(s) in his principal place of business.
1.3 REGISTRATION
The Developer consents to the registration of the Subdivision Agreement by the
Township and at the sole discretion of the Township upon the title of the lands,
the registration expenses shall be included as a legal expense to the Developer.
1.4 VOIDING AGREEMENT
In the event that the Plan is not registered within one year from the date of
signing this Agreement, the Township may, at its option, declare this Agreement
to be null and void.
1.5 MORTGAGEE BECOMING DEVELOPER
The mortgagee(s) hereby agrees that in the event of him/they becoming the
Developer(s) of the lands under his/their mortgage by way of foreclosure,
purchase or otherwise, either beneficially or in trust, then the mortgage(s) shall
be deemed to be postponed to this Agreement and any lands registered in the
name of the Township shall be free of the mortgage(s), and the mortgagee(s)
agrees to register a discharge of the mortgage(s) on those lands if called upon by
the Township, to do so, and he/they shall be subject to the terms of the
Agreement as though he/they had executed this Agreement in the capacity of the
Developer.
1.6 ASSIGNMENT OR TRANSFER OF MORTGAGE
The mortgagee(s) agrees that in the event of him assigning or transferring the
mortgage(s) on the lands, the assignment(s) or transfer(s) shall be subject to the
terms hereof, in the same manner as if the assignee or transferor has executed
this Agreement.
1.7 LANDS FOR MUNICIPAL PURPOSES
The Developer agrees to grant good title in fee simple free and clear from all
encumbrances unto the Township, lands for municipal purposes other than
roads, which shall be mutually agreed upon by the Developer and the Township
or to make a cash payment in lieu thereof, as provided by Section 51.5 of the
6
"
Planning Act and required by the Township of Oro-Medonte. The Developer also
agrees to certify good title to lands by the Developer's solicitor. The deeds for
the said lands are to be approved by the Township's Solicitor and thereafter,
forthwith, registered and deposited with the Township Clerk. The Developer shall
pay the cost for preparation and registration of the said deed. The Developer
shall provide to the Township's solicitor, certification of good title, free and clear
from all encumbrances.
1.8 EASEMENTS
The Developer agrees to grant, at his expense, all such easements and
rights-ot-ways as may be required for the installation and supply ot services to
the subdivision and to deed lands to the Township, as set out in Schedule "G".
The Developer also agrees to certify good title to easements and right-ot-ways by
the Developer's solicitor. Prior to executing this Agreement, all known
easements shall be filed with the Township in a torm approved by the Township's
solicitor.
A list of easements and rights-ot-way shall be set out in Schedule "G" of this
Agreement.
1.9 HYDRO AND TELEPHONE
Prior to the Township releasing this proposed Plan for registration, the Developer
shall provide the Township with a letter trom the electricity supplier and from the
telephone supplier, stating that the Developer has entered into a satistactory
agreement(s) with them with respect to the costs of installing underground wiring
and financial contributions in this regard.
The cost of any relocations or revisions to existing private companies' plant and
equipment, which are necessary to accommodate this subdivision, shall be borne
by the Developer.
1.10 SIMCOE COUNTY BOARDS OF EDUCATION WARNING
The Developer agrees to advise all prospective purchasers that there are no
schools planned within this subdivision, or within walking distance of it, and that
enrolment within the designated public and catholic school sites in the community
is not guaranteed, and that pupils may be accommodated in temporary facilities
out of the neighbourhood schools' area.
This clause is to be placed in any Agreement of Purchase and Sale entered into
with respect to any lots on this Plan of Subdivision. The clause should remain in
perpetuity as lots may not be sold or built upon for some time.
1.11 CANADA POST
The Developer agrees to construct a site to the specifications and standards of
Canada Post and the Township, as required for the construction of mailboxes by
Canada Post.
1.12 MINISTRY OF THE ENVIRONMENT
The Developer and each individual lot owner, agrees to comply with the
requirements and recommendations of the hydrogeologist's report prepared by
Ian D. Wilson Associates Ltd. dated March 15, 1990, revised August 22, 1991.
7
/
\\S;C
In addition, the Developer shall notify each prospective purchaser of a lot(s) that:
a) Elevated levels of sodium in individual wells may exceed 20 mg/L and
each individual well should be tested for sodium to make persons on
sodium-restricted diets aware.
This Clause is to be placed in all Agreements to Purchase and Sale
entered into with respect to any lot(s) in this plan of subdivision.
This Clause shall remain in perpetuity as lots may not be sold or built upon
for sometime.
1.13 TRANS CANADA PIPELINES
TransCanada Pipelines have outlined conditions, which must be adhered to
during the construction of the subdivision, in general, as well as the individual
grading and construction on Lots 1 to 7. The conditions are as follows:
1.13.1
All permanent structures are to be located at least 20 meters from
the limits of the TransCanada Pipelines right-of-way. This setback
is to ensure that there is sufficient workspace for future
maintenance or construction programs.
1.13.2
Wells or septic systems are to be located off the right-of-way.
1.13.3
Any grading which will affect the right-of-way or drainage onto it
must first be approved by TransCanada. No grading of the right-of-
way will be permitted in the absence of such approval or without
inspection of the grading operations by TransCanada:
1.13.4
During construction, no fill or building material may be stored on the
Pipeline right-of-way.
1.13.5
During construction of the site, temporary fencing must be erected
and maintained by the owner(s) to prevent unlimited access by
heavy machinery. TransCanada's District Office in Maple
(telephone # (905) 832-2967) must be given three working days
advance notice before the commencement of construction on the
site.
1.13.6
Landscaping of the right-of-way must be approved by TransCanada
and done in accordance with TransCanada Planning Guideline.
1.13.7
The Developer is required to submit a construction schedule to
TransCanada prior to the commencement of any work in the
subdivision.
.
1.13.8
The Developer must ensure that his contractor(s) and all sub-
contractors are fully aware and observe the foregoing conditions.
1.13.9
Conditions, restrictions or covenants specified by TransCanada
Pipelines Limited shall be registered against title in relation to the
"Lands" and the plan by way of application to register conditions,
restrictions or covenants, as applicable, pursuant to the Land Titles
Act, or any amendments thereto.
1.13.10
TransCanada Pipelines' right-of-way must be visually marked. The
markers, which must be acceptable to TransCanada, must be
placed along the right-of-way limits at each lot line.
8
1.13.11
1.13.12
\
TransCanada's Regional Office must be given five business days
advance notice at 1-800-827-5094 before the commencement of
any construction activities on the site. In the event that owners
fence the perimeter of their property, TransCanada's Regional
Office must be notified. Notification is necessary, as man gates are
required to ensure continuous access to our right-of-way in order to
carry out the ground patrols, as well as the leak detection
inspections. Fence posts will not be permitted directly over the
pipeline.
Section 112 of the National Energy Board Act requires that anyone
excavating with power-operated equipment or explosives within 30
metres of the pipeline, must obtain leave from the National Energy
Board (NEB) before starting any work. To satisfy this NEB
requirement, you may send your request for leave directly to
TransCanada Pipelines with supporting information explaining how
the work will be carried out. Once you obtain written approval for
your excavation request, you must notify TransCanada at 1-800-
827 -5094 five business days before the start of any excavation
using power-operated equipment and seven business days before
the use of explosives, within 30 metres of the pipeline right-of-way
limits.
The Developer further agrees to provide a copy of this Clause to his contractor(s)
and all sub-contractors, as well as to all prospective purchasers of Lots 1 to 7.
1.14.1
1.14 WARNING TO PROSPECTIVE LOT DEVELOPERS
1.14.2
The Developer shall provide copies of Clauses, 1.1.11, 1.1.12 and
Note of 1.1,1.10,1.11,1.12,5.5,5.7.2,7.3,7.9,7.16,8.1,8.1.1,
8.2, 8.3, 8.4, 8.5, 9.8, Schedule "E" and Schedule "F", to each
prospective purchaser of a lot(s).
The Developer shall provide copies of Clause 1.13 TransCanada
Pipelines to each prospective purchaser of Lots 1 to 7.
1.15.1
1.15 SAVE HARMLESS
1.15.2
1.16 ENUREMENT
The Developer covenants and agrees with the Township, on behalf
of itself, its successors and assigns, to indemnify and save
harmless the Township, its servants and agents from and against
any and all actions, suits, claims and demands whatsoever, which
may arise either directly or indirectly by reason of any work
performed by the provisions of this Agreement.
The Developer further covenants and agrees to release and forever
discharge the Township from and against all claims, demands,
causes of actions, of every nature and type whatsoever that may
arise either as a result of the failure of the Township to carry out
any of its obligations under this Agreement, or, as a result of the
Township performing any municipal work on the said lands or the
adjacent properties which may damage or interfere with the works
of the Developer, provided that such default, failure or neglect was
not caused as a result of negligence on the part of the Township, its
servants or agents.
This Agreement shall endure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties and
their heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns.
9
\
PART.2
THE LANDS, PLANS AND REPRESENTATIONS
2.1 SCOPE OF AGREEMENT
2.2 DESCRIPTION OF LANDS
The lands affected by this Agreement are the lands described in Schedule "A"
hereto.
2.3 PLAN REFERENCE
For the purpose of this Agreement, references are made to the Plan of
Subdivision, attached hereto, as Schedule "B". Any further changes in the said
Plan, or any changes in the Conditions of Draft Approval issued by the Township
of Oro-Medonte, may necessitate a change in the provisions of this Agreement.
2.4 CONFORMITY WITH AGREEMENT
The Developer covenants and agrees that no work shall be performed on the
said lands except in conformity with:
2.4.1 The provisions of this Agreement, including the Schedules hereinafter
referred to.
2.4.2 The Plans and Specifications submitted to and accepted by the Township
as being within its design criteria including, without limiting the generality
of the foregoing, the Drawings listed in Schedule "cn of this Agreement,
along with the Storm Water Management Study prepared by
dated
Drawing No.
Description
89967-3
89967-4
89967 -5
89967-6 and-7
89967-8, -9, -10 and -11
General Servicing Plan
Lot Grading Development Plan
Drainage & Erosion Control Plan
Plan and Profile - Forest Hill Dr.
Stat 0+000 - 0+540
Details
2.4.3 All Plans and Specifications submitted to and accepted by:
2.4.3.1
2.4.3.2
2.4.3.3
2.4.3.4
2.4.3.5
Ministry of the Environment
Hydro Service Company
Township of Oro-Medonte
Ministry of Natural Resources
Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority
2.4.4 All applicable Township By-Laws, including any applicable Site Plan
Control By-Laws.
2.4.5 All applicable Provincial and Federal Legislation and also including the
Federal Fisheries Act.
2.5 RELIANCE UPON REPRESENTATIONS
The Developer acknowledges that:
10
2.5.1 It has made representation to the Township that it will complete all
Municipal and other works required herein, in accordance with the Plans
filed and accepted by the Township and others, and;
2.5.2 The Township has entered into this Agreement in reliance upon those
representations.
2.6 SCHEDULES ATTACHED
The following Schedules are attached to and form part of this Agreement:
Schedule "A" -
Schedule "B" -
Schedule "C" -
Schedule "0" -
Schedule "E" -
Schedule "F" -
Schedule "G" -
Schedule "H" -
Schedule "I"
Schedule "J" -
Schedule uK" -
2.7 SUBDIVISION CHANGES
Description of Lands Being Subdivided
Plan of Subdivision
Works to be Constructed
Itemized Estimate of Cost of Construction of Each,
Part of the Works
List of Lots Unsuitable for Building Purposes and/or
Requiring Special Attention
Development Charges
Deeds and Easements to be Conveyed
Parkland
Declaration of Progress and Completion
General Location and Lot Grading Plans,
Standard Township Letter of Credit
There shall be no changes in the Schedules attached hereto, or in any Plan
accepted by the Township or others, unless such proposed changes have been
submitted to, and approved by, the Township and the Township Engineer.
II
PART.3
REQUIREMENTS PRIOR TO EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT
3.1 Prior to the execution of this Subdivision Agreement by the Township, the
Developer shall:
3.1.1 Taxes - have paid all Township tax bills issued and outstanding against
the said lands.
3.1.2 Deeds and Easements - have delivered to the Township all
transfers/deeds, discharges and easements or other documents required
by Schedule "G", as well as Certification from the Developer's solicitor that
the Transfer/Deeds and Easements shall provide the Township with good
title, free and clear from all encumbrances.
3.1.3 Postponement Mortgage/Charge - file with the Township solicitor, for his
approval, a postponement of Mortgage/Charge document.
3.1.4 Cash Deposits, Development Charges & Security - have paid to the
Township all cash deposits, development charges and security required by
Schedules "D" & "F".
3.1.5 Construction/Engineering Plans & Specifications - have supplied to the
Township, those Plans and Specifications necessary to identify the
construction/engineering aspects of the proposed development, and have
received from the Township an acknowledgment of conformity with
general design concepts of the Township.
3.1.6 Electricity - have supplied to the Township for approval, those plans
necessary to identify the electrical distribution system, lighting
requirements, and power supply to each lot or building or unit, as the case
may be, and these are to be to the required Township standards which
includes underground wiring.
3.1.7 Insurance Certificate - file with the Township Clerk, an insurance certificate
confirming those coverages specifically set out hereafter.
3.1.8 Consulting Engineer's Letter - ensure that each Consulting Engineer (who
must be experienced in the field of Municipal services) for the Developer,
file with the Township, a letter confirming the terms of his retainer, and
which letter shall be in draft format supplied by the Township.
3.1.9 Utilities and Canada Post Confirmation - arrange for the Electrical
Distribution Utility, Bell Telephone, the Natural Gas Utility, Cable T.v. and
Canada Post, to write a letter to the Township Clerk confirming that:
3.1.9.1 They have been informed of the project and have seen the
development plans.
3.1.9.2 Satisfactory arrangements have been made with them for
servicing the subdivision without expense or obligation on the part
of the Township.
3.1.9.3 Easement requirements, if any.
3.1.10 Land Ownership- be the registered owner in fee simple of the lands
described in Schedule "A", and that there will be no encumbrances
registered against the said lands.
12
\
3.1.11 Approvals - obtain and file with the Township, confirmation approvals
from the following:
3.1.11.1 Ministry of the Environment
3.1.11.2 Hydro Service Company
3.1.11.3 Township of Oro-Medonte
3.1.11.4 Ministry of Natural Resources
3.1.11.5 Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority
3.1.11.6 Simcoe County District School Board
3.1.11.7 Simcoe Muskoka Catholic District School Board
3.1.12 Lot Sizes - file with the Township, a certificate from an Ontario Land
Surveyor confirming that the frontage and area of each lot meets the
minimum requirements of the Township Zoning By-law.
3.1.13 Community Mail Boxes - file with the Township, a Plan showing the
location of, and access to, community mail boxes.
3.1.14 Mylars - provide for registration, Mylars of all Plans incorporated into
this Agreement as Schedules.
3.1.15 Fire Chief Approval - obtain an approval from the Fire Chief of the
Township confirming and approving of the proposed plans for fire
protection, and specifying any hydrants, or other equipment, or
appurtenances required.
13
PART-4
PRE-CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS
4.1 Prior to starting construction of the subdivision works, the Developer shall:
4.1.1 Plan Registration
Obtain final approval of the Plan from the County of Simcoe and obtain
registration of the Plan.
4.1.2 Approval of Plans
The Developer and the Engineers employed by him shall have the plans
and specifications for the works approved by the Township Engineer prior
to construction and the originals must be stamped as accepted by the
Township Engineer.
Submit and obtain the Township Engineer's approval of the following, all to
be in accordance with the Township's approved Engineering Standards:
i) the drainage plan;
ii) the lot grading plan;
iii) the service layout plan for Hydro, Telephone and Gas;
iv) the road and sewer plans and profiles.
4.1.3 Certificate of Approval
Submit to the Township, the Ministry of the Environment's Certificate of
Approval for Storm Sewer Works.
4.1.4 Contractor
The said services shall be installed by a contractor or contractors retained
by the Developer and approved, in writing, by the Township Engineer.
The Township and Township Engineer are to be provided with the names
and phone numbers of personnel responsible for the works, including
emergency phone numbers.
4.1.5 Scheduling of Works
Prior to the start of construction, the Developer shall supply for the
Township Engineers, approval of a Schedule of Works, setting out the
order in which he considers the various sections of the works within the
Plan will be built. The Township Engineer may amend this Schedule and
the Developer shall construct, install or perform the works as the Township
Engineer, from time to time, may direct. In any event the Schedule, or
amended Schedule, as the case may be, shall conform to the
requirements of Clause 4.1.8.
4.1.6 Erosion and Siltation Control
The Developer must take all necessary precautions to prevent erosion and
sedimentation of sewers, ditches, culverts, slopes, etc., both within the
subdivision and downstream prior to and during construction and upon
completion of servicing of the subdivision. Failing adequate precautions
being taken, the Developer shall be responsible for correcting any damage
and paying all maintenance costs resulting therefrom.
]4
'I \.P
A Storm Drainage and Siltation Control Plan shall be prepared by the
Developer's Engineer for approval by the Township Engineer, the Ministry
of Natural Resources, and the Nottawasaga Valley Conservation
Authority. Prior to any grading or construction commencing on the site or
final approval and registration of the subdivision, the Developer's Engineer
shall submit the Plan for approval by the Township Engineer, the Ministry
of Natural Resources, and the Nottawasaga Valley Conservation
Authority. The Plan shall detail the means whereby erosion and siltation
and their effects will be minimized on the site during and after the
construction period. The Developer agrees to carry out, or cause to be
carried out, the work approved in the Plan, and such work will be certified,
in writing, by the Developer's Engineer and provided to the Township
Engineer, the Ministry of Natural Resources, and the Nottawasaga Valley
Conservation Authority. The Developer agrees to maintain all erosion and
siltation control devices in good repair during construction.
4.1.7 Signs
Signs at least 1.2 metres by 1.8 metres shall be provided and erected by
the Developer at each entrance to the subdivision, at a location approved
by the Township Engineer, and the signs shall read as follows:
"ROADS NOT ASSUMED BY TOWNSHIP - USE AT YOUR OWN RISK"
The signs shall be painted either orange or yellow with black lettering.
These signs shall be installed prior to the commencement of construction
and be removed after the issuance of the Certificate of Substantial
Completion and Acceptance (Aboveground Services).
4.1.8 Notification of Commencement and Completion
The Developer shall not commence the construction of any of the works
until the Developer has provided forty-eight (48) hours written notice to the
Township Engineer, of his intent to commence work.
The Developer shall complete the works expeditiously and continuously
for the first phase and all underground services shall be installed within
one year of the day of registration of this Agreement, and all aboveground
services shall be installed in accordance with the Declaration of Progress
and Completion, as required under Clause 7.11 of this Agreement, but no
longer than two years from the date of registration of this Agreement,
unless extended by the Township Engineer. Subsequent phase shall be
completed within a one (1) year time frame for underground services and
two (2) years for aboveground services from date of commencement.
Should for any reason there be a cessation or interruption of construction,
the Developer shall provide forty-eight (48) hours written notice to the
Township Engineer before work is resumed;
If the municipal services to be constructed by the Developer under this
Agreement are not completed and accepted by the Township within the
above time frame, the Township may either;
a) Give notice to the Developer to stop work on the said municipal
services and to provide that no further work shall be done with respect
to such services, until an amending Agreement, incorporating the
standards, specifications and financial requirements of the Township,
in effect as of that date, is executed by all parties; or
b) Give notice to the Developer to stop work on the municipal services
and inform the Developer that the Township proposes to realize on its
security and proceed with the completion of construction in accordance
with the provisions of the Plans filed with the Township.
15
~
\ loc-
4.2
BREACH OF AGREEMENT
If the Developer commences or causes construction of the works prior to
satisfying the requirement of this Agreement, it shall be subject to the penalties
identified in Part 10.
16
\
\
\
PART-5
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS
5.1 DEVELOPER'S EXPENSE
Every provision of this Agreement, by which the Developer is obligated in any
way, shall be deemed to include the words "at the expense of the Developer"
unless specifically stated otherwise.
5.2 TOWNSHIP'S LEGAL, PLANNING AND ENGINEERING COSTS
The Developer agrees to pay to the Township, the cost of the Township's lawyer
and Planner for all costs involved in processing the subdivision and of the
Township's Engineer for checking of plans and specifications and inspection on
behalf of the Township. The inspection by the Township will depend on the type
of construction and the amount provided will be deemed necessary by the
Township. In this regard, the Developer agrees to pay to the Township, the sum
of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00) upon submitting a Plan to the Township
for consideration to be applied to account of such costs. As accounts are
received from the Township Planner, lawyer and Engineer, they will be paid by
the Township and then submitted to the Developer for reimbursement within thirty
(30) days, so that the initial deposit will again be built up to enable the Township
to pay the next accounts as they are received. In the event that the deposit is
drawn down to a level of Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00), or less, and the
Developer does not pay the accounts within thirty (30) days, it is hereby
understood and agreed that the Developer would be in default of this Agreement
and the Township may, without notice, invoke default provisions as set out in this
Agreement.
5.3 DEVELOPER'S LIABILITIES
Until the Township has issued the Certificate of Maintenance and Final
Acceptance for the works, the Developer shall indemnify the Township against all
actions, causes of action, suits, claims and demands whatsoever which may
arise either directly or indirectly by reason of the Developer undertaking the Plan,
and the Township shall not be deemed to be the Developer.
5.4 UTILITY COSTS AND CHARGES
The Developer shall deal directly with all Utilities Commissions and companies.
He or his Consulting Engineer shall obtain all approvals and permits and pay all
fees and utility charges directly to the Utility until the Certificate of Maintenance
and Final Acceptance (Underground Services) is issued.
If an additional electrical service is required for Township purposes, the
Developer shall include the cost of installation and maintenance of the service.
5.5 DEVELOPMENT CHARGES, REAL PROPERTY TAXES AND OTHER LEVIES
AND IMPOSTS
a) Development charges and education development charges shall be
payable on a per-lot basis prior to the issuance of the first Building Permit
with respect to the particular lot.
b) The Developer agrees to pay for all arrears of taxes or other Township or
provincial charges, taxes or levies outstanding against the property herein
described before the approval of the said Plan is obtained. The Developer
further undertakes and agrees to pay taxes levied on the said lands, on
the basis and in accordance with assessment and collector's roll entries
until such time as the lands herein being subdivided have been assessed
and entered on the Collector's Roll according to the Registered Plan.
17
\
\
c) Before the Plan is approved, the Developer agrees to commute and pay
the Township's share of any charges made under the Drainage Act and
the Local Improvements Act at present serving this property and assessed
against it.
These charges are set out in Schedule "F" of this Agreement.
NOTE:
In addition to the Municipal development charges, the lots may be
subject to County development charges and applicable
development charges of any Public Utility Commission.
5.6 SECURITIES
Prior to signing the Subdivision Agreement, the Developer will deposit with the
Treasurer of the Township to cover the faithful performance of the contract for the
installation of the said services and the payment of all obligations arising
thereunder, the following securities:
a) Cash in the amount of one-hundred percent (100%) of the estimated cost
of the said work as approved by the Township Engineer and Township
Council, or:
b) An irrevocable Letter of Credit from a Chartered Bank, issued in
accordance with the requirements of Schedule "K" with an automatic
renewal clause, in the amount of one hundred percent (100%) of the
estimated costs of the said works, as set out in Schedule "0" and as
approved by the Township Engineer. The Letter of Credit shall be for a
minimum guaranteed period of one (1) year, or such time as the Township
decides, and shall be renewed automatically, as necessary, three (3)
months prior to expiration. Unless the Letter of Credit is renewed as noted
above, the Township shall have the absolute right to refuse to issue
Building Permits and to prohibit occupancy of homes, whether partially or
fully completed, from the said date, three (3) months prior to the expiration
of the Letter of Credit, or the Township may cash the Letter of Credit until
a satisfactory Letter(s) of Credit is received by the Township.
c) Notwithstanding the provisions of subparagraphs (a) and (b) above, the
estimated cost of the works, as set out in Schedule "0", will be reviewed
and updated by the Township Engineer on each anniversary of the date of
execution of this Agreement. In the event of an increase, the Developer
shall provide additional security, as required by the Township Engineer,
within thirty (30) days of notice, by registered mail, from the Township
Engineer.
In the event that the Developer fails to deliver to the Township the
additional security as required by the Township Engineer, it is hereby
understood and agreed that the Developer be deemed to be in default of
this Agreement and the Township may, without notice, invoke default
provisions as set out in this Agreement.
The Township reserves the right to accept or reject any of these
alternative methods of providing securities. Prior to depositing the
securities, the Developer's Engineer shall submit an estimate of the cost of
the works to the Township Engineer for approval. When the cost estimate
has been approved, it will be set out in Schedule "0" of this Agreement
and will become the basis for the limits of the securities.
In the event that the tendered contract price for the Township services set
out in Schedule "0" is greater by 10% than the estimates in the said
Schedules, then the security provided for above shall be increased to an
amount equal to the tendered contract price.
18
d)
Application - any Letter of Credit or security filed with the Township is based
upon the estimated cost of completing the various matters prescribed by this
Agreement. However, all Letters of Credit and security received by the
Township may be used as security for any item or any other matter, which
under the terms of this Agreement, is the responsibility of the Developer,
including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, payment of
engineering, legal, planning, and development charges, or other costs
incurred by the Township, which are the responsibility of the Developer
under the terms of this Subdivision Agreement, as well as development
charges and costs to acquire lands or interest therein.
e)
Default - if, in the event of default of the Developer under any of the
provisions of this Agreement, it becomes necessary for the Township to
realize on its security or deposits, then the Township (its servants, agents or
sub-contractors) shall, if the Township so elects, have the right and privilege
at all times to enter upon the said lands for the purpose of repairing or
completing any work or services required to be completed by the Developer
under this Agreement.
f)
Exceeding Cost Estimates - if the costs of completing such work or service
exceeds the amount of security held by the Township, such excess shall be
paid by the Developer to the Township, thirty (30) days after invoicing by the
Township. All overdue accounts shall bear interest at the rate of 12% per
annum.
g)
Save Harmless - the Developer, on behalf of itself, its successors and
assigns, agrees to indemnify and save harmless the Township from and
against any and all claims, suits, actions and demands whatsoever which
may arise either directly or indirectly by reason of any work or service
performed by the Township, its servants or sub-contractors in order to
complete the work or services required to be completed under this
Agreement, provided the subject matter of such action, suits, claims or
demands was not caused intentionally or through gross negligence on the
part of the Township, its servants or agents or sub-contractors.
h)
The Construction Lien Act - if the Township becomes obligated to make any
payments, or pay any costs under the provisions of Section 17(4) of the
Construction Lien Act, this will constitute a default and entitle the Township
to realize upon its security.
i)
Surplus Funds - in the event that the Township cashes a Letter of Credit to
complete Township services or satisfy any obligations under this
Agreement. any surplus monies that remain after this work is completed
shall, upon full compliance by the Developer with the terms of this
Agreement, be returned to the issuing financial institution for transmission to
that party that took out the original Letter of Credit.
5.7 DISCHARGE OF SECURITIES
5.7.1 Estimated Cost of Works - after the completion of fifty percent (50%) of the
services based on the total estimated cost of works in the subdivision or in
an approved stage of the subdivision, and provided the Developer is in
compliance with all aspects of the Subdivision Agreement, the Developer
shall, as the work further proceeds to completion, have the privilege, on
application to the Township and upon certification of the Township
Engineer, of obtaining reductions of the cash or Letter of Credit deposited
for the installation of the services, in increments of not less than ten percent
(10%). Upon application for reduction of the securities, the Developer's
Engineer shall provide an estimate of the cost to complete the work. This
amount, when approved by the Township Engineer, shall be retained along
with twenty percent (20%) of the completed work estimate and the
remainder released upon satisfactory assurance to the Township that there
19
\
are no liens pursuant to the Construction Lien Act affecting lands conveyed
or to be conveyed to the Township within the Plan of Subdivision, pursuant
to the terms of this Subdivision Agreement.
5.7.2 Final Occupancy and Lot Grading Deposit - the Developer shall deposit with
the Township, the required Final Occupancy and Lot Grading Deposit at a
rate applicable at the time of the issuance of Building Permits. Upon
certification of final grade elevations indicating that the property has been
developed in conformity with the General Location and Lot Grading Plan by
a certified Engineer and approved by the Township Engineer, the balance of
the deposit shall be returned.
5.8 STATUTORY DECLARATION OF ACCOUNTS PAID
The Developer agrees that upon applying for a Discharge of Securities or for a
Certificate of Substantial Completion and Acceptance, or for a Certificate of
Maintenance and Final Acceptance for the services within the subdivision, or
upon applying for prior acceptance of the underground services, he shall supply
the Township with a Statutory Declaration that all accounts for work and
materials for said services have been paid and that the Construction Lien Act has
been complied with and that no liens thereunder have or can be registered,
except normal guarantee hold backs, and that there are or will be no claims for
liens or otherwise in connection with such work done or materials supplied for or
on behalf of the Developer in connection with the subdivision.
5.9 INSURANCE CERTIFICATE AND POLICY
5.9.1 Policy of Insurance - the Developer shall lodge with the Township, on
or prior to the execution of the Agreement, an insurance certificate with an
insurance company satisfactory to the Township, (which said approval
shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed), and insuring for the joint
benefit of the Developer, their agents and the Township and their agents,
against any liability that may arise out of the construction or installation of
any work to be performed pursuant to this Agreement and for a period of
one (1) year after completion and acceptance of the Township services to
be constructed herein.
5.9.2 Comprehensive General Liability - such policy shall carry limits of
liability in the amount to be specified by the Township, but in no event
shall it be less than Five Million Dollars ($5,000,000.00) inclusive
comprehensive general liability and such policy shall contain:
a) a cross-liability clause;
b) product/completed operation coverage;
c) shall not have an exclusion pertaining to blasting, provided that any
blasting required to be done shall be done by an independent
contractor duly qualified to do such work;
d) shall include the following names as insureds:
(i) THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
5.9.3 Notice of Cancellation - a provision that the insurance company agrees
to notify the Township within fifteen (15) days in advance of any
cancellation or expiry of the said insurance policy.
5.9.4 Certificate of Coverage - any certificate of coverage filed with the
Township Clerk shall specifically contain their confirmation that coverage
includes (a), (b), (c) and (d) above and are in effect.
20
5.9.5 Confirmation of Premium Payment - the Developer shall, from time to
time as required by the Township, provide confirmation that all premiums
on such policy or policies insurance have been paid, and that the
insurance is in full force and effect. The Developer shall see that a copy of
the policy is filed with the Township.
5.9.6 Claim in Excess of Policy Limits - the issuance of such policy of
insurance shall not be construed as relieving the Developer from
responsibility for other or larger claims, if any, and for which it may be
held responsible.
21
PART-6
STAGING OR PHASING
6.1 STAGING OR PHASING
The Township, in its sole discretion, may instruct the Developer to construct the
services in particular stages or phases suitable to the Township, and the
Developer must comply on terms to be agreed to by the Township. If the
Township does not so instruct, the Developer, before commencement of any
work, may request the Township's permission to divide the area of the
subdivision into convenient stages. If the work is thus staged, as approved by
the Township, then in lieu of furnishing cash payment or Letter of Credit, all as
set out in Clause 5.6 for one hundred percent (100%) of the estimated costs, as
approved by the Township Engineer, the Developer shall deposit security for part
of the services the Township has approved. Before proceeding with an additional
stage, the Developer shall obtain the written approval of the Township and no
service will be permitted to be installed and no Building Permits issued until this
approval has been received and additional securities deposited. When fifty
(50%) of the lots of the subdivision or stages of the subdivision have been built
upon and all the services have not been completed and approved by the
Township Engineer, the Township reserves the right to refuse commencement of
the next stage until all services have been installed and approved.
In no event will further subdivisions of the Developer or stages of subdivisions of
the Developer be approved if all services of the active stage approved by the
Township Engineer have not been completed within a two (2) year period after
registration of this Agreement.
Notwithstanding anything hereinafter set out, the Township shall not be obligated
to assume the responsibility for and take over the subdivision services until at
least fifty percent (50%) of the lots on the subdivision or stage of the subdivision
have completed dwellings erected therein and Occupancy Permits have been
issued. The Developer shall be responsible for the maintenance of the services
in this case until the Township has assumed the responsibility of the services.
22
PART - 7
CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS
7.1 WORKS TO BE INSTALLED
The works to be installed are set out in Schedule "C" to this Agreement. This
Schedule is to set out the works in general terms only and shall not be construed
as covering all items in detail.
The works are to be designed and constructed in accordance with the current
Engineering Standards adopted by By-Law by the Township at the time of
signing of the Subdivision Agreement. A copy of these standards is available at
the Municipal Office.
If at any time, and from time to time during the development of the subdivision,
the Township Engineer is of the opinion that additional works are necessary to
provide adequately any of the public services required by the Plan, the Developer
shall construct, install or perform such additional works at the request of the
Township Engineer.
7.2 CONSTRUCTION OF WORKS
Following the registration of this Agreement, the Developer shall cause to be
constructed, all requisite works in order to provide services to the lots and
buildings blocks within the Phase.
7 .3 PRESERVATION AND PLANTING OF TREES
7.3.1 The Developer must preserve all healthy trees within the limits of the
subdivision, where possible. If, in the opinion of the Township Engineer,
indiscriminate removal of trees takes place within the limits of the Plan of
Subdivision, including road allowances, parkland, and individual lots, the
Township shall have the option of having a Stop Work Order on
construction of the services and/or building on a particular lot where the
removal is taking place. Work will not be allowed to proceed until the
Township is satisfied that the practice will not continue and the
Developer/Builder agrees to carry out remedial work requested by the
Township. The Developer agrees to provide a copy of this clause to each
and every prospective builder/prospective purchaser.
7.3.2 The Developer shall plant two (2) 2A metre, or taller, hardwood trees of a
minimum of 50 mm caliper on each lot having less than three (3) trees in
the front yard(s), if required by the Township. The type of trees must be
satisfactory to the Township.
7.3.3 In addition, the Developer shall plant trees with the above specifications at
15 metre intervals around the perimeter of the park, in areas where there
is not a sufficient growth of trees.
7.4 MOVEMENT OF FILL
The Developer covenants and agrees that he shall not dump, nor permit to be
dumped, any fill or debris on, nor shall he remove or permit to be removed, any
fill, topsoil, trees or shrubs from any public or Municipal lands, without the written
consent of the Township Engineer.
23
'\\0c
7.5 BLASTING
Before any blasting is proceeded with by the Developer, the Developer shall
obtain from the Township Engineer or Township Public Works Official, written
permission for carrying out the blasting operation, and shall obtain the blasting
permit and show proof of insurance for all damage or claims for damage resulting
from the blasting operation. The Developer, in any event, shall be responsible for
any such claims.
7.6 ACCESS ROADS
All access roads must be maintained by the Developer in good repair acceptable
to the Township Engineer and Township Public Works Official during the time of
construction, including dust control and the removal of any mud or debris tracked
from the subdivision, and no roadway outside the limits of the proposed
subdivision may be closed without the written consent of the Township Public
Works Official. For the purpose of getting such consent, the Developer shall
advise the Township Public Works Official and the Township Clerk of the date
and time they wish to close a roadway. The Township reserves the right to limit
or prohibit the use of any existing access road by the Developer.
7.7 DAMAGE TO EXISTING PLANT
The Developer shall repair any damages caused to an existing road, road
allowance or existing structure or plant located on the road allowance as a result
of the subdivision development and shall pay for any costs involved in the
relocation of existing services, such as hydrants, telephone poles, etc., which
may become necessary because of the development of the subdivision. In this
regard, the Developer's Engineer shall arrange for an inspection with the
Township Public Works Official and Township Engineer for the purpose of
compiling an inventory of existing conditions prior to work on the subdivision.
Otherwise, the Township Public Works Official's assessment of conditions prior to
construction will be final.
7.8 DUST CONTROL
Until the Certificate of Substantial Completion and Acceptance (Aboveground
Works) has been issued, the Developer shall apply calcium to the roads within
the subdivision and/or utilized by construction traffic, in quantities sufficient to
prevent any dust problem to traffic or home occupants, to the satisfaction of the
Township Engineers.
If the Developer has not taken remedial action within twenty-four (24) hours of
receiving a written notification (via facsimile) from the Township's Engineer
regarding a dust control problem, then the Township's Engineer, at their sole
discretion, shall employ outside forces to implement, at the Developer's expense,
a suitable measure of dust control.
7.9 CONSTRUCTION REFUSE
All construction refuse, garbage and debris from the subdivision must be
disposed of in an orderly and sanitary fashion by the Developer, off the site of the
subdivision, at a licensed landfill site. The Township is not responsible for the
removal or disposal of refuse, garbage and debris. Open air burning is not
permitted by the Township. The Developer agrees to deliver a copy of this
clause to each and every builder obtaining a Building Permit for any lot or part of
a lot on the said Plan of Subdivision.
24
7.10 INSPECTION OF CONSTRUCTION OF SERVICES
During construction of the services, the Township may inspect the work in hand
at such times and with such duration and frequency as the nature of the type of
construction may dictate. Subject to the obligations of the Township Engineer to
protect the interests of the Township through such inspections, every effort will
be made to keep duplication of engineering services on site to a minimum. If,
during such inspections, the Township Engineer perceives that construction,
whether by method or otherwise, constitutes an immediate danger to life or
property, or construction does not conform to acceptable practice in order to
meet the requirements for services, he will have the authority to cease
construction operations by verbal notice to the contractor and/or the Developer's
Engineer, such notice to be confirmed, in writing, as soon as possible, thereafter.
A copy of this clause shall be delivered by the Developer to each and every
contractor engaged in construction of services for the subdivision.
7.11 DECLARATION OF PROGRESS AND COMPLETION
7.11.1 Prior to the approval of the underground services, the Developer shall
provide the Township Engineer with an undertaking for the completion
dates of all remaining works required by this Agreement and in a form
similar to that attached to this Agreement as Schedule "I", the Declaration
of Progress and Completion, for approval of the Township Engineer. The
Township reserves the right to alter the completion dates as it sees fit and
the Developer agrees to complete the services.
7.11.2 It is understood and agreed that should the Developer fail to construct
the remaining services, as stipulated, and by such dates as provided in
the Declaration, the Developer shall pay to the Township, as pre-
determined liquidated damages, the sum of Fifty Dof/ars ($50.00) for
each and every day the said services are behind schedule of
construction, and NO FURTHER BUILDING PERMITS SHALL BE
ISSUED.
7.12 PROGRESS OF WORKS
After the completion of the underground services, the Developer shall complete
the Declaration of Progress and Completion for the approval of the Township
Engineer and from that date, the said Declaration shall apply and take
precedence over Clause 4.1.5. Prior to signing the Declaration of Progress and
Completion, the Developer shall install all works in accordance with the Schedule
of Works or as directed by the Township Engineer. If he fails to adhere to the
scheduling provisions outlined in the Schedule of Works or the Declaration, or
having commenced to install the aforesaid works, fails or neglects to proceed
with reasonable speed, or in the event that the aforesaid works are not being
installed in the manner required by the Township Engineer, then upon the
Township Engineer giving seven (7) days written notice by prepaid registered
mail to the Developer, the Township Engineer may, without further notice, enter
upon the said land and proceed to supply all materials and to do all necessary
works in connection with the installation of the said works, including the repair or
reconstruction of faulty work and the replacement of materials not in accordance
with the specifications, and to charge the costs thereof, together with an
engineering fee of ten percent (10%) of the cost of such materials and works to
the Developer who shall forthwith pay the same upon demand. If the Developer
fails to pay the Township within thirty (30) days of the date on the bill, the money
owing may be deducted from the cash deposit or Letters of Credit. It is
understood and agreed between the parties hereto that such entry upon the land
shall be as agent for the Developer, and shall not be deemed for any purpose
whatsoever, as an acceptance or assumption of the said works by the Township.
25
The Township, in addition to all other remedies it may have, may refuse to issue
Building Permits until such works are completely installed in accordance with the
requirements of the Township Engineer. It is agreed that a copy of this clause be
delivered by the Developer to each and every builder obtaining a Building Permit
for any lot or part of a lot on the said Plan.
7.13 SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION OF UNDERGROUND SERVICES
It is intended that the electricity and street lighting, and storm sewer system will
be constructed, inspected and approved prior to the completion of the other
works, including roads and boulevards.
Building Permits will not be issued until the Township Engineer has given the
Certificate of Substantial Completion and Acceptance (Municipal Underground
Services). The two (2) year maintenance period for the underground services will
commence when this Certificate is issued.
During the maintenance period, the Developer shall be responsible for the normal
operation and maintenance, and all repairs for the services noted in the
Certificate.
If, during the two (2) year maintenance period, the Developer fails to carry out
rectification and repair work as requested by the Township, then the Township
may carry out the work and be reimbursed the cost of the work from the
Developer's securities, as set out under Clause 9.3.
Notwithstanding anything hereinafter set out, the Township shall not be obligated
to assume the responsibility for and take over the subdivision services until fifty
percent (50%) of the lots on the subdivision or stage of the subdivision have
completed dwellings erected therein and Occupancy Permits have been issued.
The Developer shall be responsible for the normal operation, maintenance, and
all repairs of the services, in this case, until the Township has assumed the
responsibility of the services.
7.14 EMERGENCY REPAIRS
Employees or agents of the Township may enter onto the lands at any time, or
from time to time for the purpose of making emergency repairs to any of the
works. Such entry and repairing shall not be deemed an acceptance of the
works by the Township or any assumption by the Township of any liability in
connection therewith, or a release of the Developer from any of his obligations
under this Agreement.
7.15 USE OF WORKS BY TOWNSHIP
The Developer agrees that:
I. The works may be used prior to acceptance by the Township or other
authorized persons for the purpose for which such works are designed.
II. Such use shall not be deemed an acceptance of the works by the Township,
and;
III. Such use shall not in any way relieve the Developer of his obligations in
respect of the construction and maintenance of the works so used.
7.16 DRAINAGE AND LOT GRADING
All lots and blocks within the Plan and all lands abutting the Plan shall be graded
to drain in accordance with the overall Grading Plan 89967-4 prepared by the
Developer's Engineer, and approved by the Township Engineer and the
Township of Oro-Medonte February 15, 1993. Some fill and regrading of lots
26
may be necessary during or after building construction. The Grading Plan shall
show all existing and final grades on lot corners, as well as mid-lot elevations,
where deemed necessary by the Township Engineer.
It is understood and agreed by the parties hereto that drainage of surface water
on the lots and blocks on the Plan is the sole responsibility of the respective lot
owners once the required drainage works have been constructed by the
Developer.
The storm swales shall be landscaped and maintained by all subsequent lot
owners. The purpose of the storm swales is to accommodate storm drainage
waters from the subject lot and adjacent lands. No lot owner in the subdivision
shall encumber or impede storm drainage in any manner whatsoever. In the
event that the Developer, or any subsequent lot owner, obstructs, impedes, or
interferes with the storm drainage flow through any part of the storm swale, or
interferes with the acceptance of water from any connecting swales, then the
Township shall have the right, if it so elects, to enter upon the subject lands to
rectify such problems so that the swales can serve their original purpose.
Within the swale area, the Developer, and any subsequent lot owner, shall not
construct any works, remove, or permit to be removed, any soil from the said
swale/easement, excavate, drill, install, erect, or permit to be excavated, drilled,
installed or erected in, over, upon, under or through the said swale/easement,
any fence, well, foundation, pavement, building or other structure or other
installation,
The lot owner of any lot in the subdivision upon which the Township elects to
enter for the purpose of rectifying the said work, hereby agrees to indemnify and
release the Township from and against all claims, demands, actions or causes of
action whatsoever arising as a result of the Township or of its servants or agents
entering upon the lands for the purpose of correcting drainage problems. The
cost of such work will be for the account of the lot owner. Any invoices not paid
within thirty (30) days after the due date, shall be added to the tax roll and
collected in a like manner as realty taxes, as per Section 326 of the Municipal
Act.
The Developer agrees to deliver a copy of this clause to each and every
prospective purchaser and/or builder obtaining a Building Permit for any lot or
part of a lot on the said Plan of Subdivision.
Generally, the drainage facilities will consist of open ditches within the
subdivision or storm sewers in certain locations to provide a satisfactory drainage
outlet, and will be in accordance with the Drainage Plan 89967-5 prepared
by the Developer's Engineer, and approved by the Township Engineer and the
Township of Oro-Medonte dated February 15,1993.
7.17 PARKLAND WORKS
All parkland works indicated on the Park Development Plan are to be constructed
in accordance with Section 14 - Park Requirements of the Township of Oro-
Medonte Engineering Standards and Drawings.
The parkland must be completed to the satisfaction of the Township prior to the
issuance of 25% of the total Building Permits allowed in the subdivision.
27
"
7.18 DEFINITIONS
For the purposes of this Subdivision Agreement:
(i) The term "Underground Services" shall mean the storm drainage works
(including culverts, storm sewer and detention pond), waterworks,
underground electrical distribution system, and street lighting serving the
Plan of Subdivision, as more particularly described in Schedule "C" to this
Subdivision Agreement.
(ii) The term "Certificate of Substantial Completion and Acceptance (Municipal
Underground Services)" shall mean a Certificate issued by the Township
upon the recommendation of the Township Engineer confirming that the
Municipal Underground Services to be installed by the Developer under the
provisions of this Subdivision Agreement, as more particularly identified in
Schedule "C", have been substantially completed in accordance with plans
and specifications reviewed and accepted by the Township Engineer. The
issuance of a Certificate of Substantial Completion and Acceptance
(Municipal Underground Services) shall not constitute an assumption of the
Municipal Underground Services by the Township.
(iii) The term "Certificate of Maintenance and Final Acceptance (Municipal
Underground Services)" shall mean a Certificate issued by the Township
upon the recommendation of the Township Engineer confirming that the
Municipal Underground Services constructed by the Developer, in
accordance with the terms of this Subdivision Agreement, and as more
particularly identified in Schedule "C", have been satisfactorily completed
and maintained by the Developer during the two-year (2) maintenance
period, and issuance of the said Certificate shall constitute final acceptance
and assumption of the Municipal Underground Services by the Township.
(iv) The term "Aboveground Services" shall mean all Municipal services to be
constructed by the Developer pursuant to the terms of this Subdivision
Agreement, as more particularly identified in Schedule "C", excluding
Underground Services.
(v) The term "Certificate of Substantial Completion and Acceptance
(Aboveground Services)" shall mean a Certificate issued by the Township
upon the recommendation of the Township Engineer confirming that the
Aboveground Services to be installed by the Developer under the provisions
of this Subdivision Agreement, as more particularly identified in Schedule
"C", have been substantially completed, in accordance with plans and
specifications reviewed and accepted by the Township Engineer. The
issuance of a Certificate of Substantial Completion and Acceptance
(Aboveground Services) shall constitute an assumption of the Aboveground
Services by the Township for winter maintenance only.
(vi) The term "Certificate of Maintenance and Final Acceptance (Aboveground
Services)" shall mean a Certificate issued by the Township upon the
recommendation of the Township Engineer confirming that the
Aboveground Services constructed by the Developer in accordance with the
terms of this Subdivision Agreement, and as more particularly identified in
Schedule "C", have been satisfactorily completed and maintained by the
Developer during the two-year (2) maintenance period, and issuance of the
said Certificate shall constitute final acceptance and assumption of the
Aboveground Services by the Township.
(vii) The term "Certificate of Substantial Completion and Acceptance" means a
Certificate of Substantial Completion and Acceptance (Municipal
Underground Services) or a Certificate of Substantial Completion and
Acceptance (Aboveground Services), as the provisions of this Subdivision
Agreement require.
28
\lo
(viii) The term "Certificate of Maintenance and Final Acceptance" means a
Certificate of Maintenance and Final Acceptance (Municipal Underground
Services) or a Certificate of Maintenance and Final Acceptance
(Aboveground Services), as the provisions of this Subdivision Agreement
require.
29
PART-8
BUILDING PERMITS AND OCCUPANCY
8.1 TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
The Developer further agrees that he or any person, persons, or Corporation
claiming title through the Developer, will not apply for a Building Permit for any
part or portion of the said lands or on any lot therein, and no Building Permit shall
be issued until a Sewage System Permit approval has been received for the land
in question.
The Developer's Engineer shall prepare an overall Lot Development Plan for
approval by the Township of Oro-Medonte and the Township Engineer, as a
further requirement to Clause 7.16. The Plan shall include the following:
a) envelopes for the proposed house and any adjacent structures on each lot.
b) an envelope showing the location, size and elevation of the subsurface
sewage system on each lot and all pertinent engineering design criteria.
c) existing and proposed grades of the disturbed area of lot after building,
drainage and sewage works have been completed.
d) existing and proposed grades on lot corners and mid-lot elevation.
e) location and type of proposed water.
8.1.1 The Developer agrees to advise all prospective lot Developers that a detailed
Site Development Plan for each lot may be required to be prepared by a
Professional Engineer registered with the Association of Professional Engineers
of Ontario, experienced in private sewage system design, for approval by the
Township Engineer, prior to the issuance of a Sewage System Permit for each
respective lot. Site Development Plans, which conform to the overall Lot
Development Plan at an approved metric scale using metric dimensions and
elevations, shall include the following:
a) the location, dimensions and elevations of the proposed dwelling and any
structures to be located on the lot, as well as any adjacent structures on the
adjacent lot(s).
b) the location, size and elevation of the sewage system, all engineering design
criteria and standards pertaining thereto, shall be provided.
c) the location and type of water well, including the water service line to the
dwelling.
d) the existing and proposed grades of the disturbed area on the lot after
building, drainage and sewage works have been completed.
e) the location and grades of any proposed drainage swales.
f) the Professional Engineer will be required to check the elevations of the
footings of the buildings prior to further construction to ensure conformity with
the approved Plans noted above.
g) the Professional Engineer will be required, prior to the issuance of a Final
Inspection Report, to certify to the Township of Oro-Medonte, in writing, that
the foregoing works have been carried out in accordance with the approved
Plans noted above.
30
I
\ -
The Developer further agrees to construct all works required under Clause 7.16,
and as shown on the approved General Location and Lot Grading Plan 89967-4,
Storm Drainage Area Plan and Erosion Control Plan 89967-5, all prepared by
Brumwell & Associates Inc., approved February 15, 1993, to the satisfaction of
the Township of Oro-Medonte and the Township Engineer.
The Developer further agrees to advise all prospective lot owners of the
requirement that it may be necessary for the sewage system to be installed prior
to construction of the home, subsequent to the issuance of a Sewage System
Permit.
8.2 REQUIREMENTS FOR BUILDING PERMITS
The approval of the Plan by the Township, or the acceptance by the Township of
the works, shall not be deemed to give any assurance that the Building Permits,
when applied for, will be issued in respect of the lots or blocks shown on the
Plan.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, no Building Permits will be given and the Chief
Building Official may refuse any application until:
(i) Township of Oro-Medonte approvals have been obtained and submitted to
the Township. The Township of Oro-Medonte sewage approval authority
requirements are set out in Clauses 7.16 and 8.1.
(ii) The Storm Water System has been installed, tested and approved by the
Township Engineer and he has issued his Certificate of Substantial
Completion and Acceptance (Municipal Underground Services).
(iii) Plans for remaining underground services such as Bell Telephone,
Electricity or Natural Gas have been approved.
(iv) A "Builders" road consisting of the grading, curb and gutter or ditch
shaping and full depth of Granular "B" sub-base, has been constructed on
the road providing access to the lot.
(v) Approval of the Township Engineer has been obtained for the construction
of any buildings to be erected on lots or blocks listed in Schedule "E"
hereto.
(vi) Signs denoting "Unassumed Roads" have been installed at the entrances
to the subdivision in a location acceptable to the Township, in accordance
with Clause 4.1.7.
(vii) A Certificate Letter and Lot Development Plan has been given by the
Developer's Consulting Engineer or a Professional Engineer registered
with the Association of Professional Engineers of Ontario, that the building
to be erected on any lot or block within the Plan, for which a Building
Permit has been applied for, is in conformity with the General Location and
Lot Grading Plans, or has received the approval of the Township Engineer
with respect to any variance to the Grading Plan.
The individual Lot Development Plan must be approved by the Township
Engineer prior to the issuance of a Building Permit.
(viii) All dead trees within the limit of the Plan have been removed.
(ix) Arrangements have been made and approved by the Township for
Municipal Address System numbering, as set out in Clause 8.4.
(x) The parkland must be completed to the satisfaction of the Township, as
per Section 7.17.
31
\loc-
(xi) The Traffic and Street Name signs have been installed and approved by
the Township Engineer.
(xii) Any development charges have been paid, in full, in accordance with the
applicable development charge By-Laws, enacted pursuant to the
Development Charges Act, 1997, as well as By-Laws enacted pursuant to
Section 257.53 of the Education Act, or alternate arrangement satisfactory
to the body enacting the development charge By-Law, have been made
and the same has been communicated to the Chief Building Official for the
Township of Oro-Medonte, in writing, by such a body.
(xiii) The Developer has paid, in full, his portion, on a per-lot basis, for the
construction of the joint fire reservoir located at Block 19, Plan 51 M-710.
8.3 LOTS UNSUITABLE FOR BUILDING OR LOTS REQUIRING SPECIAL
ATTENTION
Any lot, which will require special attention in order to be serviced, will be listed
on Schedule "E" of this Agreement. Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit for
any lot listed in Schedule "E", the Developer's Engineer must submit a letter to
the Township Engineer outlining the measures to be taken to correct the
problems on the lot. This proposal must be approved prior to applying for a
Building Permit.
8.4 MUNICIPAL ADDRESS SYSTEM
The Developer shall be responsible for obtaining the municipal address system
numbers for each and every lot from the Municipal Office. As a further
requirement, in order to obtain a Provisional Certificate of Occupancy, the
Developer and/or builder or lot owner, shall install the aforementioned number at
a location approved by the Township. The Developer agrees to provide a copy of
this clause to each and every builder or lot owner in advance of the sale of such
lot(s).
8.5 REQUIREMENTS FOR OCCUPANCY
8.5.1 No buildings erected on the lots or blocks within the Plan shall be
occupied until a PROVISIONAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY has
been issued by the Township in accordance with the Township Building
and Plumbing By-Law.
PROVISIONAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY means a permit issued
to allow occupancy of a building.
8.5.2 A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY will not be issued until:
(i) The roadway has received the granular road base materials full
depth and the base course of asphalt, provided asphalt is
commercially available.
(ii) The underground hydro, telephone lines, gas mains and street
lights have been installed and approved by the Township Engineer.
(iii) A Certificate Letter and individual Lot Development Plan has been
given by the Developer's Consulting Engineer, or a Professional
Engineer registered with the Association of Professional Engineers
of Ontario, that the building constructed, and the final grading of the
lot or block, is in conformity with the General Location and Lot
Grading Plans, or such variance therefrom has been approved by
the Township Engineer.
32
\
The final grading on the individual Lot Development Plan must be
approved by the Township Engineer prior to the issuance of a
FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY.
FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY means a permit issued
when all outstanding items on a Provisional Certificate of
Occupancy, including grading, have been completed.
(iv) Driveway culvert and end protection has been provided to the
satisfaction of the Township, in accordance with the Township's
Road Occupancy Permit
(v) The trees have been planted on the lot by the Developer in
accordance with Clause 7.3.
(vi) Any deficiencies on a Provisional Certificate of Occupancy has
been complied with. It is agreed that a copy of Part 8 shall be
delivered by the Developer to each and every builder obtaining a
Builder's Permit or any prospective purchaser of the dwelling for
any lot or part of a lot on the said Plan.
8.6 OCCUPANCY LIQUIDATED DAMAGES
Notwithstanding the above, if for any reason whatsoever, occupancy of any
building occurs before the vital services listed in Clause 8.5 are installed to the
home occupied to the satisfaction of the Township Engineer, then the Developer
agrees to pay to the Township, liquidated damages in the amount of One
Hundred Dollars ($100.00), per dwelling, per day, to cover the additional costs
of administration, inspection and fire protection, etc. The liquidated damages to
commence at and include the date of occupancy and end when the Developer
obtains a certificate from the Township Engineer that the vital services are
satisfactorily installed. If the Developer fails to pay to the Township, monies
owing under this clause within thirty (30) days of the date of the bill, the money
may be deducted from the cash deposit or Letter of Credit or other deposited
security.
33
PART-9
MAINTENANCE AND ACCEPTANCE
9.1 FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF MUNICIPAL UNDERGROUND SERVICES
On receipt of the Developer's request for a final inspection of the underground
services, the Township Engineer will again inspect the work and if satisfied, will
recommend to the Township that the Certificate of Maintenance and Final
Acceptance (Municipal Underground Services) be issued. It should be noted that
the Certificate of Maintenance and Final Acceptance (Municipal Underground
Services) can be applied for by the Developer two (2) years after the receipt of
the Certificate of Substantial Completion and Acceptance (Municipal
Underground Services).
Notwithstanding anything hereinafter set out, the Township shall not be obligated
to assume the responsibility for and take over the subdivision services until fifty
percent (50%) of the lots on the subdivision or stage of the subdivision have
completed dwellings erected therein and Occupancy Permits have been issued.
The Developer shall be responsible for the normal operation, maintenance, and
all repairs of the services in this case until the Township has assumed the
responsibility of the services.
9.2 SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION OF ABOVEGROUND SERVICES
When all of the services have been completed, including the surface lift of
asphalt in accordance with this Agreement or in a particular stage, the Township
Engineer and Public Works Official shall make an inspection to ensure that the
Township will accept the road system. The Township Engineer shall issue a
Certificate of Substantial Completion and Acceptance (Aboveground Services)
when the works are accepted by the Township. This Certificate may contain a
list of minor deficiencies, which have to be corrected by the Developer, but which
are not considered of sufficient importance to delay the issuance of the
Certificate and the acceptance of the services by the Township. The two (2) year
maintenance period will commence when the Township Council approves the
issuance of the Certificate.
9.3 MAINTENANCE OF WORKS
The Developer will be responsible for the repair and maintenance of all the
subdivision services for a period of two (2) years from the date the Township
Council approves the Certificate of Substantial Completion and Acceptance. This
shall be called the Maintenance Period. The maintenance shall include the
maintaining and mowing of grass within the road allowances, as well as the
parkland area and detention pond, on a regular basis. If the Township is
requested to carry out this maintenance, the Developer shall pay all charges to
the Township.
If, during this period, the Developer fails to carry out maintenance work within
forty-eight (48) hours after receipt of a request from the Township, then the
Township Engineer may, without further notice, undertake such maintenance
work and the total cost of such work, including Engineering fees, shall be borne
by the Developer. If the Developer fails to pay the Township within thirty (30)
days of the date of billing, then the money owing may be deducted from the cash
deposit or Letter of Credit. During the maintenance period, ten percent (10%) of
the original estimated cost of the works shall be retained by the Township.
Towards the end of the maintenance period, the Developer shall make written
request to the Township for a final inspection to be made and notwithstanding the
two (2) year period noted above, the maintenance period will continue for the
34
original two (2) years, or for thirty (30) days after the receipt of the Developer's
written request for a final inspection, whichever period of time is the greater.
Notwithstanding anything hereinafter set out, the Township shall not be obligated
to assume the responsibility for and take over the subdivision services until fifty
percent (50%) of the lots on the subdivision or stage of the subdivision have
completed dwellings erected therein and Occupancy Permits have been issued.
The Developer shall be responsible for the maintenance of the services in this
case until the Township has assumed the responsibility of services.
9.4 WINTER ROAD MAINTENANCE
An exception to the liability of the Developer for all maintenance and repair of the
services during the two (2) year maintenance period will be winter control, which
operation will be the Township's responsibility after the issuance of the Certificate
of Substantial Completion and Acceptance (Aboveground Services). Winter
control shall include snow plowing, sanding and any other winter maintenance
operations. It is agreed by the Developer that the winter control operations shall
not prejudice the Township's rights to enforce the maintenance provisions. Prior
to the issuance of the Certificate of Substantial Completion and Acceptance
(Aboveground Services) however, the Developer shall be responsible for the
winter control also. In the event that proper vehicular access or winter control is
not provided by the Developer, the Township, through its servants, contractors,
or agents, may provide without notice to the Developer. Such winter control shall
be only carried out at times deemed to be an emergency by the Public Works
Official. All costs of such work shall be paid by the Developer within thirty (30)
days of the date of billing or otherwise may be deducted from the cash deposit or
Letter of Credit.
The cost of such works to be at the following rates:
Machinery and Equipment
Labour
Mixed Sand and Salt
Payroll Burden - 41 %
Administration - 7%
G.S.T. - 7%
$40.00/hr.
$20.00/hr.
$12.00/m3
The Township may adjust these rates from time to time.
The Developer further agrees that any work done by the Township pursuant to
this Agreement before the roads are accepted by the Township, shall not be
deemed in any way to be an acceptance by the Township of the roads in the said
subdivision upon which such work is done. The Developer acknowledges that
the Township, whilst providing winter control, may damage or interfere with the
works of the Developer and covenants that he will make no claims against the
Township for such interference or damage, providing the work is carried out in a
normal and reasonable manner.
9.5 REPLACEMENT OF SURVEY BARS
Prior to the final acceptance of the subdivision by the Township, the Developer
agrees to supply a statement from an Ontario Land Surveyor approved by the
Township that after the completion of the subdivision work, he has found or
replaced all survey monuments, standard iron bars and iron bars shown on the
registered plan. The statement must be dated within two months of the date of
acceptance.
35
9.6 FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF ABOVEGROUND SERVICES
Upon receipt of the Developer's request for a final inspection of the Aboveground
Services, the Township Engineer will again inspect the work and if satisfied, will
recommend to the Township that the Certificate of Maintenance and Final
Acceptance be issued.
Notwithstanding anything hereinafter set out, the Township shall not be obligated
to assume the responsibility for and take over the subdivision services until fifty
percent (50%) of the lots on the subdivision or stage of the subdivision have
completed dwellings erected therein and Occupancy Permits have been issued.
The Developer shall be responsible for the maintenance of the services, in this
case, until the Township has assumed the responsibility of the services.
9.7 RELEASE OF LAND
The Developer, when not in default of the Subdivision Agreement to provide the
requisite public services to the lands, shall be entitled to an effective release in a
form suitable for registration in the land Registry Office for each lot or block,
which is in conformity with the overall Grading Plan for the lands or such variance
therefrom as has been approved by the Township Engineer.
Every such release shall operate as a discharge of all levies hereunder by the
Township in respect to each lot or block described in the release, with the
exception of the responsibility for drainage as outlined in Clause 9.8 and the
completion and maintenance of the services.
9.8 DRAINAGE - RESPONSIBILITY OF DEVELOPER AND SUBSEQUENT
OWNERS
It is understood and agreed that the drainage of surface waters upon and from the
said lands shall remain the sole responsibility of the Developer and the subsequent
owners, from time to time, of the lots or blocks within the Plan of Subdivision. The
Developer and subsequent owners of the lots or blocks within the Plan of
Subdivision, from time to time, shall provide and maintain adequate drainage of
surface waters across and from the said lands in accordance with the provisions of
Section 7.16 of this Subdivision Agreement. The Developer agrees to provide a
copy of this Section 9.8 and Section 7.16 to each and every prospective
builder/prospective purchaser of a lot or block within the Plan of Subdivision.
The Developer and the owner, from time to time, of any lot or block within the Plan
of Subdivision upon which the Township elects to enter for the purpose of rectifying
the said work, hereby agrees to indemnify and release the Township from and
against all claims, demands, actions or causes of action whatsoever arising as a
result of the Township or of its servants or agents entering upon the lands for the
purpose of correcting drainage problems. The cost of such work will be for the
account of the Developer and/or subsequent lot owner. Any invoices not paid
within thirty (30) days after due date, shall be added to the tax roll and collected in
a like manner as realty taxes as per Section 326 of the Municipal Act.
36
\\sc ~
PART -10 . DEFAULT PROVISIONS
10.1 DEFAULT PROVISIONS
Notwithstanding anything herein before contained in this Subdivision Agreement,
and in addition to any other remedies, when the Developer is deemed by the
Township to be in default of this Agreement, the Township reserves the right to
realize upon any securities deposited on or on behalf of the Developer to recover
costs incurred by the Township, in accordance with the provisions of Section 5.6 of
this Subdivision Agreement, and/or to restrict or refuse issuance of Building and/or
Occupancy Permits, and the Developer agrees not to apply for any Building
Permits or Occupancy Permits for lots or blocks within the Plan of Subdivision, until
such time as the Developer is in full compliance with the provisions of this
Subdivision Agreement.
10.2 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS
This Agreement shall be binding upon and ensure to the benefit of the parties
hereto and their respective heirs, executors, administrators and assigns.
10.3 SUBSTITUTION FOR APPROVALS
Wherein this Agreement reference is made to any named Ministry of the Province,
Township of Oro-Medonte or other public body, such reference where the same
requires their approval, is deemed to be a reference to any other Ministry or body
as may be substituted by legislative change or policy of the Provincial Govemment
or of the Township.
10.4 CHARGES OR EXPENSES INCURRED BY THE TOWNSHIP
The Developer further agrees that all costs, charges or expenses incurred by the
Township in satisfying the obligations of the Developer in the event of default of the
Developer under the terms of this Subdivision Agreement, together with any costs,
charges or expenses incurred by the Township in enforcing the obligations of the
Developer under this Agreement, shall be a first charge or lien againstthe said
lands in accordance with the provisions of Section 326 of the Municipal Act.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Agreement and have
hereunto caused to be affixed the corporate seals, duly attested to by the proper signing
officers.
SIGNED, SEALED AND DELIVERED !hI, if{ day of cL"{
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
,2003.
Per
J. Neil Craig
Title Mayor
Per
Marilyn Pennycook
Title Clerk
Per
IZ..-
, It v G: c- {D ;.J
Title .s~<!. /22/~rp""i.
per;?~~ ~~~
a~.-
Title f/t c:: S,
~L~M/::~ 'J~i'~
~ ~._i tL.,~~
37
\
SCHEDULE "A"
NOTE:
It is understood and agreed that this Schedule forms part of the
Subdivision Agreement between the TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
AND TERRA RIDGE DEVELOPMENTS INC.
DESCRIPTION OF lANDS AFFECTED BY THIS AGREEMENT
All AND SINGULAR, that certain parcel or tract of premises, situate, lying, and being in
the Township of Oro-Medonte (formerly Township of Oro), in the County of Simcoe, and
being composed of the whole of the lands described as follows:
Part of the East Half of lot 14, Concession 1, designated as Parts 1, 3, 4, 5 and 6, Plan
51 R-22770, save and except Parts 1,2 and 3, Plan 51 R-30901, being all of PIN
#58544-0115 (Lt).
38
SCHEDULE "B"
NOTE:
It is understood and agreed that this Schedule forms part of the
Subdivision Agreement between the TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
AND TERRA RIDGE DEVELOPMENTS INC.
PLAN OF SUBDIVISION
51-M
39
\lY
SCHEDULE "C"
NOTE:
It is understood and agreed that this Schedule forms part of the
Subdivision Agreement between the TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
AND TERRA RIDGE DEVELOPMENTS INC.
WORKS TO BE CONSTRUCTED
_ Complete roadway construction, including excavation ditching, granular roadbed
materials, and curb and gutter, as required, two (2) lifts of asphalt, topsoil and
seeded boulevards with erosion control measures, as required.
- Storm drainage works, including ditches, culverts, and storm sewers.
- Street and traffic signs.
- Underground hydro and telephone, and streetlighting.
- Parkland.
- Joint fire water reservoir and well to be constructed at Block 19, Plan 51M-710
(Martin Brook Subdivision).
Fencing perimeter of development.
All of the works are incorporated onto the following Engineering Drawings prepared by
Skelton, Brumwell and Associates Inc., Project #89-967, Municipal Affairs #43T-90051.
The Drawings listed below were stamped, as accepted, by the Township Engineers, R.
G. Robinson and Associates (Barrie) Ltd., February 15, 1993:
89967-8, -9, -10 and -11
General Servicing Plan
Lot Grading Development Plan
Drainage & Erosion Control Plan
Plan and Profile - Forest Hill Dr.
Stat 0+000 - 0+540
Details
89967-3
89967-4
89967-5
89967-6 and -7
40
\
SCHEDULE "D"
NOTE:
It is understood and agreed that this Schedule forms part of the
Subdivision Agreement between the TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
AND TERRA RIDGE DEVELOPMENTS INC.
ITEMIZED ESTIMATE OF COST OF CONSTRUCTION OF EACH PART OF THE
WORKS
The following list summarizes the cost estimate of the major works, but is not
necessarily inclusive:
A) Roadway construction complete, including clearing
and grubbing, excavation, granular road base
materials, concrete curb and spillways and two lifts
of asphalt............... ................................................................ .$138,200.00
B) Storm drainage works complete, including storm
sewers, ditch inlet catchbasins, culverts, topsoil, seed
and mulch, sod, ditching and siltation and erosion control
devices............................................................. ................$ 97,090.00
C) Miscellaneous items such as street name and
regulatory signs................................................................$ 3,600.00
D) Electrical supply, including street lights,
control panels and duct crossings....................................... .....$ 19,435.00
E) Parkland works, including grading, trees, fence
and park sign................................... ................. ..............$ 10,000.00
F) Fencing perimeter of subdivision........................................$ 34,000.00
SUB-TOTAL
$302,325.00
G) Allowance for Engineering and supervision.........................$ 30,232.50
7% G.S.T.
$332,557.50
$ 23,279.03
TOTAL
GRAND TOTAL COST
$355,836.53
4]
SCHEDULE "E"
\G
NOTE:
It is understood and agreed that this Schedule forms part of the
Subdivision Agreement between the TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
AND TERRA RIDGE DEVELOPMENTS INC.
LIST OF LOTS UNSUITABLE FOR BUILDING PURPOSES
& LIST OF LOTS REQUIRING SPECIAL ATTENTION
See Clause 1.12 - Ministry of the Environment
Clause 1.13 - TransCanada Pipelines - Lots 1 to 7
Clauses 8.1 and 8.3 - Which set out specific requirements for all lots on the Plan
in order to obtain a Building Permit for each and every lot.
42
SCHEDULE "F"
\
NOTE:
It is understood and agreed that this Schedule forms part of the
Subdivision Agreement between the TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
AND TERRA RIDGE DEVELOPMENTS INC.
DEVELOPMENT CHARGES
The Developer acknowledges and agrees that the following development charges are
payable on a per-lot basis prior to the issuance of the first Building Permit for each
particular lot, unless alternative arrangements with the body enacting the By-Law
relating to development charges or education development charges, which
arrangements have been braught to the attention of the Chief Building Official, all
charges are payable by cash or certified cheque in Canadian funds to the Chief Building
Official of the Township:
(i) Development charges in accordance with By-Law 99-081 of the Township of Ora-
Medonte at the rate applicable, upon the issuance of the first Building Permit for
each lot upon which charges are payable.
(ii) Educational development charges in accordance with By-law [#3203-00] of the
Simcoe-Muskoka Catholic District School Board at the rate that applies upon the
issuance of the first Building Permit with respect to each lot upon which
educational development charges are payable; and
(Hi) Educational development charges in accordance with By-law #3 (2000) of the
Simcoe County District School Board at the rate that applies upon the issuance
of the first Building Permit with respect to each lot upon which educational
development charges are payable.
Please be advised that specific rates applicable to each lot in the Plan of Subdivision
can be obtained by contacting, for the Township of Ora-Medonte, the Treasurer; for the
Simcoe-Muskoka Catholic District School Board, the Associate Director of Education;
and in the case of the Simcoe County District School Board, the Superintendent of
Facility Services.
Please also be advised that development charge By-Laws may be enacted after the
date of this subdivision by the County of Simcoe or by a Public Utility Commission
pursuant to the Development Charges Act, 1997, which may impose a charge on the
development of the lands within the plan of subdivision;
Also, please be advised that the above-referenced By-Laws enacted pursuant to the
Development Charges Act, 1997 and Section 257.53 of the Education Act, may be
amended or superceded by subsequent By-Laws enacted in accordance with the
respective legislation.
43
!
SCHEDULE"G"
\\.0(-
~
NOTE:
It is understood and agreed that this Schedule forms part of the
Subdivision Agreement between the TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
AND TERRA RIDGE DEVELOPMENTS INC.
DEEDS AND EASEMENTS TO BE CONVEYED
All title documents shall be properly drawn and executed by the parties, with the
appropriate Lot or Block Number inserted in the description of the document, and the
registered Plan Number shall be left blank, to be inserted by the solicitors for the parties
after the Plan is registered and a Plan Number assigned.
The consideration for all conveyances shall be the sum of Two Dollars ($2.00) and the
cost of preparation, execution and registration thereof, shall be borne by the Developer.
All documents to be registered, shall be prior approved by the solicitor for the Township.
The following land and easement shall be conveyed:
1.0 LANDS TO BE CONVEYED TO THE TOWNSHIP
1.1 Block 16
1.2 Block 17
1.3 Block 18
1.4 Block 19
1.5 Block 20
Parkland
Fire Reservoir
0.3 m Reserve
0.3m Reserve
3.0 m Future Road widening
Plan 51-M
Plan 51-M
Plan 51-M
Plan 51-M
Plan 51-M
2.0 STORM EASEMENTS
44
,
,
,
NOTE:
PARKLAND
Block 16
SCHEDULE "H"
\
It is understood and agreed that this Schedule forms part of the
Subdivision Agreement between the TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
AND TERRA RIDGE DEVELOPMENTS INC.
Plan 51-M
45
G
,
. f' i
SCHEDULE "I"
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
DECLARATION OF PROGRESS AND COMPLETION
SUBDIVISION
DEVELOPER
CONSULTING ENGINEER
As required by the Agreement between the CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF
ORO-MEDONTE AND TERRA RIDGE DEVELOPMENTS INC.
The Developer(s) dated
1. The Developer hereby agrees and undertakes to complete the construction of the
Works as required by the above-mentioned Agreement in accordance with the
time schedule for the completion of services as approved by the Township
Engineer and more specifically in accordance with the following schedule and
conditions:
a) Before any building erected on the lots or blocks in the Plan are occupied
all the Requirements for Occupancy, as set out in Clause 8.5, shall be
complied with.
b) Granular "B" and Granular "A" on or before
c) Grading, topsoiling and seeding of private blocks and parks on or before_
d) Boulevard sodding on all roads on or before
e) Hot asphalt on or before
f) Planting of trees on or before
2. The Developer further agrees that the Township is hereby authorized to carry
out, at his expense, any of the work set out in this Declaration not finished on or
before the completion dates, to be commenced not sooner than one week
following such completion date, it being understood and agreed that the
Township's authorization is limited only to that work required under the
Declaration;
3. The Developer undertakes to properly maintain the gravel road base at all times
and to keep all roads in a mud-free and dust-free condition until such times as
the roads, including boulevards, have been completed;
46
~ p J
4. The Developer further agrees and the Township is hereby authorized to
undertake any of the maintenance work as set out under Item 3 hereof, not
completed by him within 24 hours after receipt of such request for maintenance,
at his expense, and without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the
Township's cost shall be the cost of materials, equipment rental, labour, payroll
burden, plus 20% for overhead;
5. It is understood and agreed that should the Developer fail to construct the
remaining services to carry out the requirements of Item 3 as stipulated, and by
such dates and within such time limits as provided by this undertaking, the
Developer, notwithstanding the costs noted in Section 4, shall pay to the
Township, as predetermined liquidated damages, the sum of Fifty Dollars
($50.00) for each and every calendar day the said services are behind schedule
of construction provided such delay is not caused by strikes or acts of God or
additional work being required by the Township.
TERRA RIDGE DEVELOPMENTS INC.
Seal or Witness
Date
47
\ t: J'
\~ -
SCHEDULE "J"
NOTE:
It is understood and agreed that this Schedule forms part of the
Subdivision Agreement between the TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
AND TERRA RIDGE DEVELOPMENTS INC.
GENERAL LOCATION AND LOT GRADING PLANS
PROCEDURE
After the Lot Grading Development Plan has been approved by the Township,
then:
a) six copies to be delivered to the solicitor for the Township.
b) six copies to be delivered to the Township.
c) Mylars for each Plan incorporated into the Subdivision Agreement shall be delivered
to the solicitor for the Township.
..
48
'r
IJ
ROYAL BANK
ORiGiNAL
PAGE: 1
INT'L TRADE CENTRE - ONTARIO
180 WELLINGTON ST W.,
9TH FLOOR,
TORONTO, ONTARIO, M5J 1J1
CANADA
~TE OF ISSUE: MAY 13, 2003
OUR REFERENCE NUMBER:
P301857T04117
DATE OF EXPIRY: MAY 12, 2004
. PLACE OF EXPIRY: TORONTO, ONTARIO
ti::NEFICIARY:
dE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF
RO-MEDONTE
.0. BOX 1003
RO, ONTARIO LOL 2XO
APPLICANT:
TERRA RIDGE DEVELOPMENTS
514 WELHAM ROAD
BARRIE, ON
L4N 8Z7
AMOUNT: CAD 208,487.01
TWO HUNDRED EIGHT THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED
EIGHTY SEVEN AND 01/100'S CANADIAN
DOLLARS
RREVOCABLE STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT NO. P301857T04117
lE HEREBY AUTHORIZE YOU TO DRAW ON ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, INTERNATIONAL TRADE
~ENTRE-ONTARIO, 180 WELLINGTON STREET WEST, TORONTO, ONTARIO, M5J lJl, FOR THE
~CCOUNT OF TERRA RIDGE DEVELOPMENTS, UP TO AN AGGREGATE AMOUNT OF TWO HUNDRED
~fGHT THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED EIGHTY SEVEN AND 01/100'S CANADIAN DOLLARS
(CAD.208,487.01) WHICH IS AVAILABLE ON DEMAND.
?URSUANT TO THE REQUEST OF OUR SAID CUSTOMER, TERRA RIDGE DEVELOPMENTS, WE,
~OYAL BANK OF CANADA, INTERNATIONAL TRADE CENTRE-ONTARIO, 180 WELLINGTON STREET
NEST, TORONTO, ONTARIO MSJ 1Jl, HEREBY ESTABLISH AND GIVE YOU AN IRREVOCABLE
LETTER OF CREDIT IN YOUR FAVOUR, IN THE ABOVE AMOUNT, WHICH MAY BE DRAWN ON BY
~
...
e
ROYAL BANK
C(",,~.r~, i Gl~_i.~.L' .
.)/ ,~~,u l~r\.
~Sl
;.;
--
P301857T04117
PAGE: 2
OU AT ANY TIME AND FROM TIME TO TIME, UPON WRITTEN DEMAND FOR PAYMENT MADE UPON
S BY YOU WHICH DEMAND WE SHALL HONOUR WITHOUT ENQUIRING WHETHER YOU HAVE A
IGHT AS BETWEEN YOURSELF AND OUR SAID CUSTOMER TO MAKE SUCH DEMAND AND WITHOUT
ECOGNIZING ANY CLAIM OF OUR SAID CUSTOMER OR OBJECTION BY THEM TO PAYMENT BY
S.
EMAND SHALL BE BY WAY OF A LETTER SIGNED BY AN AUTHORIZED SIGNING OFFICER OF
'HE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE. THE ORIGINAL LETTER OF CREDIT
DST BE PRESENTED TO US AT ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, INTERNATIONAL TRADE
~ENTRE-ONTARIOI 180 WELLINGTON STREET WEST, TORONTO, ONTARIO MSJ IJl. THE LETTER
IF CREDIT, WE UNDERSTAND, RELATES TO A SUBDIVISION SERVICING AGREEMENT BETWEEN
'UR SAID CUSTOMER AND THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE.
'HE AMOUNT OF THIS STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT MAY BE REDUCED FROM TIME TO TIME AS
J)VISED BY NOTICE IN WRITING, GIVEN TO US BY AN AUTHORIZED S!GNINGOFFICER OF
'HE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE.
)ARTIAL DRAWINGS ARE PERMITTED. WE HEREBY AGREE THAT PARTIAL DRAWINGS UNDER THIS
JETTER OF CREDIT WILL BE DULY HONOURED UPON DEMAND.
~HIS LETTER OF CREDIT WILL CONTINUE IN FORCE FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR, BUT SHALL
~E SUBJECT TO THE CONDITION HEREINAFTER SET FORTH.
:T IS A CONDITION OF THIS LETTER OF CREDIT THAT IT SHALL BE AUTOMATICALLY
~XTENDED WITHOUT AMENDMENT FOR ONE YEAR PERIODS FROM THE EXPIRY DATE HEREOF, OR
~ FUTURE EXPIRATION DATE, UNLESS AT LEAST THIRTY (30) DAYS PRIOR TO ANY SUCH
~XPIRY DATE, WE SHALL NOTIFY YOU BY REGISTERED MAIL OR COURIER, AT YOUR ADDRESS
,PECIFIED ABOVE, OR ANY OTHER YOU HAVE ADVISED TO THIS DEPARTMENT IN WRITING,
rHAT THIS LETTER OF CREDIT WILL NOT BE EXTENDED FOR ANY SUCH ADDITIONAL PERIOD.
~XCEPT AS OTHERWISE EXPRESSLY STATED THIS CREDIT IS ISSUED SUBJECT TO UNIFORM
:USTOMS AND PRACTICE FOR DOCUMENTARY CREDITS, (1993 REVISION), ICC PUBLICATION
~O . 500.
WE ENGAGE TO HONOUR PRESENTATIONS SUBMITTED WITHIN THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS
INDICATED ABOVE.
\~/
~\
g
ROYAL BANK
o \G\NAL
- 1) :;)
A.R. FEANANDES
P301857T04117
PAGE: 3
"..At"
GOGyDJ)' \\IIM''-
----~1/~--iJM---
OTHER SIGNATURE
THIS DOCUMENT CONSISTS OF 3 PAGE(S).
\ t I
IJ)c-
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
BY-LAW NO. 2003-047
Being a By-law to Authorize the Execution of a Pre-Service Agreement
2008628 Ontario Ltd. (Diamond Valley Estates)
WHEREAS Section 51, Subsection (26) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter
P .13, as amended, provides that municipalities may enter into agreements imposed as
a condition to the approval of a plan of subdivision and such agreements may be
registered against the land to which the subdivision plan applies;
AND WHEREAS the Council of the Township of Oro-Medonte deems it desirable to
enter into a Pre-Service Agreement with the Owner, 2008628 Ontario Ltd. (Diamond
Valley Estates), Phase 1 A, Part of Lot 3, Concession 7, being Parts 1, 2 and 3, 51 R-
31839, being all of PIN#58533-0214(Lt), Township of Oro-Medonte, County of Simcoe;
NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Township of Oro-Medonte hereby enacts as
follows:
1. That the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized to execute, on behalf of the
Township of Oro-Medonte, a Pre-Service Agreement, a copy of which is
attached hereto and forms part of this By-law as Schedule "A".
2. That the Municipality shall be entitled to enforce the provisions of the Pre-
Service Agreement against the owners.
3. That this By-Law shall come into force and take effect on the final passing
thereof.
By-Law read a first and second time this 21st day of May, 2003.
By-Law read a third time and finally passed this
day of
,2003.
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
Mayor, J. Neil Craig
Clerk, Marilyn Pennycook
-~
Schedule "A" to
By-law No. 2003-047
PRE-SERVICING AGREEMENT
- between -
2008628 ONTARIO LTD.
PHASE 1A
- and -
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO - MEDONTE
DESCRIPTION OF LANDS
Part of Lot 3, Concession 7, Being Parts 1, 2 and 3, 51R-31839
Being all of PIN #58533-0214 (Lt)
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
COUNTY OF SIMCOE
April, 2003
By-Law No.
\
PRE-SERVICING AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT MADE BETWEEN:
THE CORPORATION OF THE
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
(hereinafter called the "Township")
- and -
2008628 ONTARIO LTD.
(hereinafter called the "Developer")
WHEREAS the Developer is the registered owner of the lands described in Schedule
"A" attached (the "Subdivision Lands");
AND WHEREAS the Developer desires to commence installing municipal services with
the Subdivision Lands, prior to the registration of the Plan of Subdivision and the
execution of the Subdivision Agreement with the Township;
NOW THEREFORE THE PARTIES HERETO AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
1. ASSUMPTION OF RISK BY DEVELOPER
1.1 The Developer agrees to assume all risk in commencing installation of Township
services on the Subdivision Lands, prior to the execution of a Subdivision
Agreement with the Township, and the registration of the Plan of Subdivision.
The Developer hereby releases the Township, its agents, servants and
employees from and against all actions, suits, claims and demands whatsoever,
which may arise either directly or indirectly as a result of the installation of
Township services by the Developer.
1.2 The Developer acknowledges and agrees that, in the event that a Subdivision
Agreement with the Township is not finalized for any reason and the Plan of
Subdivision is not registered as a result, pre-servicing of the Subdivision Lands
shall cease immediately.
1.3 The Developer acknowledges and agrees that engineering design plans and
specification for the Township services to be installed by the Developer, as
submitted to the Township, in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, may
require further amendment as a result of requirements imposed by the Township
under the terms of the Subdivision Agreement to be entered into for the
Subdivision Lands. The Developer covenants and agrees to assume all risk and
responsibility for the cost of required revisions to the engineering design
drawings and specifications for the Township services, together with the costs of
modifying, reconstructing, removing and/or replacing the Township services
installed by the Developer, pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, in order to
satisfy the requirements finally imposed by the Township at the time that the
Subdivision Agreement is entered into.
1.4 The Developer acknowledges and agrees this approval relates only to the
installation of the following Township services:
1. Road Works and Granular
2. Watermains
3. Sewers and Drainage
4. Base Course of Asphalt
2
1.5 The Developer acknowledges and agrees that no work shall be carried out on
any existing Township right-of-way, and that there shall be no connection to
services on any Township right-of-way.
1.6 The Developer acknowledges and agrees that no work shall be carried out on
lands not owned by the Developer, without the written consent of the owner to be
filed with and approved by the Township.
1.7 The Developer acknowledges and agrees that all Servicing Plans must comply
with Federal, Provincial and Township provisions.
2. REQUIREMENTS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF WORK
2.1 The Developer agrees to submit the following to the Township, in a form
satisfactory to the Township, prior to the commencement of the installation of
Township services on the Subdivision Lands:
a) A letter from a qualified Engineer experienced in the field of Township
services confirming:
1. Retainer - That their firm has been retained by the Developers to act as
Consulting Engineers for 2008628 Ontario Ltd.
2. Terms of Retainer - The terms of their retainer with the Developer as
follows:
a) Plans and Specifications - Prepare plans and specifications for the
construction of Township services;
b) Cost Estimates - Prepare cost estimates for the Township services
to be constructed from the drawings;
c) Approvals - Obtain all necessary approvals to construct;
d) Co-ordination - Co-ordinate the installation of Township services to
avoid conflicts with regards to telephone, cable T.V. and Township
services;
e) On-Site Inspections - Ensure that all on-site inspections of
Township service installations are conducted by the Developer's
Consulting Engineers at all times during construction;
f) As-Constructed Drawings - Submit certified "as-constructed"
drawings after acceptance of the Township services;
a) Change in Retainer - If at any time during the project:
i) The terms of their retainer are changed by the Developer, or;
ii) If they become aware that they will not be able to provide
"as-col'lstructed" drawings, they will notify the Township
within twenty-four (24) hours;
b) Erosion and Siltation Control - Ensure all necessary precautions
are taken to prevent erosion and sedimentation of sewers,
ditches, culverts, slopes, etc., both within the subdivision and
downstream, prior to and during construction.
b) Confirmation letters are to be filed with the Township Clerk, confirming the
following:
1) The Township Engineer has no objection to the pre-servicing;
2) The Planning Department has no objection to the pre-servicing;
3) The Township Solicitors have no legal objections to the pre-servicing.
3
c) Payment of cash or certified cheque required to cover the cost of the
Township's lawyer and Planner for all costs involved in processing the Pre-
Servicing Agreement, and for all the Township's Engineers for checking of
plans, specifications and inspection on behalf of the Township for the sum of
Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00). As accounts are received from the
Township Planner, lawyer, and Engineer, they will be paid by the Township
and then submitted to the Developer for reimbursement within thirty (30) days.
In the event that the deposit is drawn down to a level of Five Thousand
Dollars ($5,000.00) or less, and the Developer does not pay the accounts
within thirty (30) days, it is hereby understood and agreed that the Developer
is in default of this Agreement and all work must cease;
d) A Letter of Credit, as per Schedule "C", in the amount set out in Schedule "B",
attached, as security to ensure the due completion of the Township services
to be constructed by the Developer, and as security to be held by the
Township for the warranty periods to be more particularly described in the
Subdivision Agreement for the Subdivision Lands. The said Letter of Credit
shall provide that if in the sole opinion of the Township, default under the
terms of this Agreement has taken place, the said Letter of Credit may
thereupon be drawn upon in whole or in part;
e) A certified copy of an insurance policy, or a certificate of insurance, confirming
comprehensive general liability in the amount of Five Million Dollars,
($5,000,000.00), naming the Township as co-insured, and containing the
following additional provisions or endorsements:
1) Products/Completed Operations provisions;
2) Cross-liability clause;
3) Blasting included, only if done by an independent contractor;
4) Notice of Cancellation - a provision that the insurance company agrees
to notify the Township within fifteen (15) days, in advance, of any
cancellation or expiry of the said insurance policy.
f) All servicing plans shall be submitted to and accepted by the Township
Engineer;
g) The Ministry of the Environment and Energy has given technical approval
to the servicing plans.
3. INSPECTION BY THE TOWNSHIP
3.1 The Developer agrees to permit unrestricted access to the Subdivision Lands to
the Township and its agents for the purpose of inspection of the Township
services to be installed by the Developer. Notwithstanding that inspections may
be conducted by the Township or its agents, the Developer shall bear sole
responsibility for the soundness of the engineering design of the Township
services, and for ensuring that the Township services to be installed will function,
as intended, and will be compatible with the final Plan of Subdivision when and if
such Plan of Subdivision is approved.
3.2 If, in the opinion of the Township, there is an emergency situation as a result of
any work undertaken by the Developer or its servants, or agents, which requires
immediate attention to avoid damage to private or public property or services
owned by the Township or to eliminate a potential hazard to persons, such work
may be done immediately by the Township at the expense of the Developer, but
notice shall be given to the Developer at the earliest possible time.
4
4. APPLICATION OF SECURITY
4.1 In the event of default by the Developer under the terms of this Agreement, or if
the Township is required to enter onto the Subdivision lands or the abutting
Township lands to conduct any work on the Township services or the connection
of the Township services to facilities due to an emergency, the Township shall be
entitled to draw upon the security posted by the Developer pursuant to the terms
of this Agreement, in whole or in part, to cover the costs incurred by the
Township in remedying the default on the part of the Developer, or in addressing
the emergency situation.
5. NO REDUCTION OF SECURITY
5.1 The Developer acknowledges and agrees that no reduction in the amount of
security filed by the Developer with the Township, in accordance with the terms
of this Agreement, shall be permitted until such time as the Developer has
entered into the Subdivision Agreement for the Subdivision lands with the
Township. Thereafter, any reductions in the security posted by the Developer
shall be completed in accordance with the terms of the said Subdivision
Agreement.
6. NO ASSUMPTION OF TOWNSHIP SERVICES
6.1 The Developer acknowledges and agrees that the Township shall not be required
to assume the Township services to be constructed by the Developer, pursuant
to the terms of this Agreement, until such time as the Developer has entered into
a Subdivision Agreement with the Township for the Subdivision lands, and the
Township services have been completed, inspected, and approved.
7. NOTICE
7.1 Any notice required to be given pursuant to this Agreement may be given by
prepaid registered post to the Developer at the following address:
2008628 Ontario ltd.
45 Casmir Court, Unit #1
CONCORD, Ontario
l4K 4H5
and such notice shall be deemed to have been given and received on the third
day after mailing.
8. NO ASSIGNMENT
8.1 The Developer shall not assign or otherwise transfer the benefit of this
Agreement without the written consent of the Township, which may be
unreasonably withheld.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Developer has hereunto set its hands and seals this
0< I 'Sf day of r4 f JZ I L- , 2003.
~ '-Ie
Per:A~~ ~ ~7:1--C
2008628 Ontario td.
Ernie Bottero
Has the Authority to Bind the Corporation
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Township has hereunto sets its hands and seals this
day of , 2003.
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
J. Neil Craig, Mayor
Per:
Per:
Marilyn Pennycook, Clerk
SCHEDULE "A"
DESCRIPTION OF LANDS:
Part of Lot 3, Concession 7, being Parts 1,2 and 3, 51 R-31839, being all of PIN
#58533-0214 (Lt).
SCHEDULE "B"
CASH DEPOSITS TO BE FILED WITH THE TOWNSHIP:
+
1. Ensure erosion and siltation control and any works
that may be required by Township forces as a result
of work performed within the subdivision.
TOTAL CASH DEPOSITS TO THE TOWNSHIP
SECURITY TO BE DEPOSITED WITH THE TOWNSHIP
7
$ 20.000.00
$ 20.000.00
$ 20,000.00
J'~S.cotiabankTU
.. Banque Scotiawc
PJ\.GE: 1
SL(1 NSTDISLC
)NTAPIO INTL TRADE
j;ERVICES,
;1 FRONT STREET WEST, 4TH FLOOR,
fORONTO, ONTARIO, CANADA M5H 1Hl TEL. NO.: 416-866-6/17
\lYd -
DATE OF ISSUE: APRIL 28, 2003
IRREVOCABLE STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT
NO: S18572/191459
AMOUNT: NOT EXCEEDING CAD 20,000.00
DATE OF EXPIRY: APRIL 27, 2004
fO:
fHE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF
)RO-MEDONTE
~.O. BOX 100) ORO) ONTARIO)
LOL 2XO
APPLICANT: /, . ,
2008628 ONTP.PIO L TD \ 01 Ao...:,.,..>o Y~::l'.Vi."'1 t;Si\~.)
185 P.DESSO DR)
CONCORD) ONTARIO,
CANP.DA. L4K 3C4
DEAf.~ SIR(S) :
WE HEREBY AUTHORIZE YOU TO DRAW ON THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA, ONTARIO
INTERNATIONAL TRADE SERVICES, 61 FRONT STREET WEST, 4TH FLOOR, TORONTO, ONTARIO,
CANADA M5H IHl FOR THE ACCOUNT OF 2008628 ONTARIO LTD., UP TO AN AGGREGATE
AMOUNT OF TWENTY THOUSAND CANADIAN DOLLARS (CAD20,000.00) WHICH IS AVAILABLE ON
DEMAND.
PURSUANT TO THE REQUEST OF OUR SAID CUSTOMER, 2008628 ONTARIO LTD., WE, THE
BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA, ONTARIO INTERNATIONAL TRADE SERVICES, 61 FRONT STREET WEST,
4TH FLOOR, TORONTO, ONTARIO, CANADA M5H 1H1 HEREBY ESTABLISH AND GIVE TO YOU AN
IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT IN YOUR FAVOUR, IN THE ABOVE AMOUNT, WHICH MAY BE
DRAWN ON BY YOU AT ANY TIME AND FROM TIME TO TIME, UPON WRITTEN DEMAND FOP
PAYMENT MADE UPON US BY YOU WHICH DEMAND WE SHALL HONOUR WITHOUT ENQUIRING
WHETHER YOU HP.\lE THE RIGHT AS BETWEEN YOUffSELF P.ND CIUR SAID CUSTCIMER T(1 MP.KE
SUCH DEMAND AND WITHOUT RECOGNIZING ANY CLAIM OF OUR SAID CUSTOMER OR OBJECTION
BY THEM TO PAYMENT BY US.
DEMAND SHALL BE BY WAY OF A LETTER SIGNED BY AN AUTHORIZED SIGNING OFFICER Of
THE CORPORATION Of THE TOWNSHIP OF OPO-MEDONTE. THE ORIG.INAL LETTER OF CREDIT
MUST BE PRESENTED TO US AT : THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA, ONTARIO INTERNATIONAL
TPADE SERVICES, 61 FRONT STREET WEST, 4TH FLOOR, TORONTO, ONTARIO, CANADA M5H
1H1. THE LETTER OF CREDIT WE UNDERSTAND, RELATES TO A SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT
BETWEEN OYR SAID CUSTOMER AND THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF QRO-MEDONTE,
WITH 850892 ONTARIO LIMITED, AS A THIPD PARTY, REGARDING PRE-SERVICING AGREEMENT
RE - PART OF LOT 3, CONCESSION 7, BEING PARTS 1, 2 AND 3, 51P-31839 - BEING ALL
OF PIN # 58533-0214 (LF).
..
~
. .
,u-,""",,, "G"~~"'u-,OR>"
/
AUTHORIZED SIGNATUREISIGNATAIRE AUTORISE
143 (7199) THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA/LA BANOUE DE NOUVELLE.ECOSSE
)RIGINAL 3 . ADVISING BANKfBANOUE NOTIFICATRICE
:USTOMER/CLlENT 4. BRANCH/SUCCURSALE
(ISSUING BANK NOTE: RETAIN IF ISSUED BY BRIEF CABLEIFULL CABLEISWIFT)
(NOTE A LA BANQUE EMETTRICE : A CONSERVER SI AVIS BREFICOMPLET EMIS PAR CABLE/SWIFT)
TM Trademark of The Bank of Nova Scotia, Me Marque de commerce de La Banque de Nouvelle.Ecosse.
.
1"Scotiabank'"
... Banque Scotiowc
F1<AGE: 2.
\~d-
THE AMO~NT OF THIS LETTER OF CREDIT MAY BE REDUCED FROM TIME TO TIME. AS
~DVISED BY NOTICE IN WRITING, GIVEN TO US BY AN AUTHORIZED SIGNING OFFICER OF
-HE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE.
~
~ARTIAL DRAWINGS SHALL BE PERMITTED. WE HEREBY AGREE THAT PARTIAL DRAWINGS
JNDER THIS LETTER OF CREDIT WILL BE DULY HONOURED UPON DEMAND.
..
THIS lETTER OF CREDIT WILL CONTINUE IN FORCE FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR, BUT
;HAlL BE SUBJECT TO THE CONDITION HEREINAFTER SET FORTH. IT IS A CONDITION OF
fHIS LETTER OF CREDIT THAT IT SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE AUTOMATICALLY EXTENDED
~ITHOUT AMENDMENT FROM YEAR TO YEAR, FROM THE PRESENT OR ANY FUTURE EXPIRATION
)ATE HEREOF, UNLESS AT LEAST THIRTY (30) DAYS PRIOR TO THE PRESENT. OR ANY
FUTURE EXPIRATION DATE, WE NOTIfY YOU IN WRITING BY REGISTERED MAIL THAT WE
ELECT NOT TO CONSIDER THIS LETTER OF CREDIT TO BE RENEWABLE FOP ANY ADDITIONAL
PERIOD.
EXCEPT SO FAR AS OTHERWISE EXPRESSLY STATED THIS LETTER OF CREDIT IS SUBJECT TO
THE UNIFORM CUSTOMS AND PRACTICE FOR DOCUMENTARY CREDITS (1993 REVISION',
INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE PUBLICATION NO. 500.
YOURS VERY TRULY,
.}.
~AA c-~lk.f<L-
AUTHORIZED SI E AUTORISE
.~~
1/7
/l;/J
8144
THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA/LA BANQUE DE NOUVELLE-ECOSSE
3 - ADVISING BANKlBANQUE NOTIFICATRICE
(ISSUING BANK NOTE: RETAIN IF ISSUED BY BRIEF CABLE/FULL CABLE/SWIFT)
(NOTE A LA BANQUE EMETTRICE : A CONSERVER SI AVIS BREF/COMPLET EM IS PAR CABLE/SWIFT)
- ORIGINAL
...... .....-_.._... I_I ...........
A nnA"I""U/~II""""IIDe^1 c::
TM Trademark of The Bank of Nova Scolia. Me Marque de commerce de La Banque de NouveUe--Ecosse.
, e.-\
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
BY -LAW NO. 2003-048
Being a By-law to Authorize the Execution of a Contract between the Township of
Oro-Medonte and the Barrie Public Library Board for a Term of One Year
"
WHEREAS, the Public Libraries Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter P .44, Section 29(1) provides for
the entering into a contract with a public library board for the purpose of providing the
residents of the municipality with library services;
AND WHEREAS, Council deems it desirable to enter into a Contract with the Barrie Public
Library Board;
NOW THEREFORE, the Council of The Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte enacts
as follows:
1. That the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized to execute the contract between The
Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte and the Barrie Public Library Board, said
agreement attached hereto as Schedule 'A' and forming part of this by-law.
2. That By-law No. 2002-038 is hereby repealed.
3. That this By-Law shall come into force and take effect on the final passing thereof.
BY-LAW READ A FIRST AND SECOND TIME THIS 21st DAY OF MAY, 2003.
BY-LAW READ A THIRD TIME AND FINALLY PASSED THIS
2003.
DAY OF
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
Mayor, J. Neil Craig
Clerk, Marilyn Pennycook
Schedule "A" to
By-law No. 2003-048
LIBRARY SERVICES AGREEMENT
This agreement made in duplicate this
day of
2003
"
BETWEEN
THE BARRIE PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD, in the County of Simcoe
AND
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE,
in the County of Simcoe
WHEREAS the Barrie Public Library Board has agreed to provide library service.
THEREFORE it is mutually understood and agreed that the Corporation of the Township
ofOro-Medonte will pay the Barrie Public Library Board the sum of$87,150.00 for
library service for Oro-Medonte residents and taxpayers for the year 2003 with payment
to be made quarterly, commending January 1 st, April 1 s\ July 1 st and October 1 s\ 2003.
Signed in the County of Simcoe this
day of
2003.
Mayor,Oro-Medonte
Chair, Barrie Public Library Board
Clerk,Oro-Medonte
Treasurer, Barrie Public Library Board
[
-{
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
SITE PLAN CONTROL
BY-LAW NO. 2003-049
Being a By-Law to Authorize the Execution of a Site Plan Control Agreement
between The Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte,
and Beard's Farm Supply Limited
described as lands as follows:
Part of the East Half of Lot 1, Concession 11,
being Part 3, 51 R-12482 and Part 1, Plan 51 R-18249,
being all of PIN#58529-0113(Lt)
Township of Oro-Medonte, County of Simcoe
i'
WHEREAS authority to enter into Site Plan Control Agreements is provided for in
Section 41 of The Planning Act, R.S.O., 1990, c, P. 13, as amended, and Council
deems it necessary to enter into a Site Plan Control Agreement on the lands described
herein;
AND WHEREAS By-Law No. 94-149, a By-Law to Designate Parts of the Township as
Site Plan Control Areas, was passed by Council for the Township of Oro-Medonte,
pursuant to the provisions of The Planning Act, R.S.O., 1990, c. P. 13, as amended;
AND WHEREAS the lands referred to in this By-Law are subject to Site Plan Control,
pursuant to By-Law No. 94-149;
NOW THEREFORE the Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte hereby enacts as
follows:
1. THAT the Township enter into the Site Plan Control Agreement attached hereto, as
Appendix "A", on lands described on the attached Schedule "A";
2. THAT the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized to execute the Site Plan Control
Agreement on behalf of the Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte;
3. THAT the attached Appendix "A" and Schedule "An shall form part of this By-Law;
4. THAT this By-Law shall come into force and take effect upon being enacted by
Council.
By-law read a first and second time this 21st day of May, 2003.
By-law read a third time and finally passed this
day of
,2003.
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
Mayor, J. Neil Craig
,
Clerk, Marilyn Pennycook
~
..
,
May, 2003
By-Law No. 2003-
APPENDIX "A"
to By-law No~,2003-049
SITE PLAN AGREEMENT
- between -
BEARD'S FARM SUPPLY LIMITED
- and -
THE CORPORATION OF THE
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
DESCRIPTION OF LANDS
Part E % Lot 1, Concession 11, Being Part 3, 51R-12482
and Part 1, 51R-18249
Being all of PIN #58529-0113 (Lt)
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
COUNTY OF SIMCOE
THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
SITE PLAN AGREEMENT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
"
Section 1 Covenants by the Owner '"
Section 2 Covenants by the Township
Section 3 Development Restrictions
Section 4 Development Changes
Section 5 Security
Section 6 Compliance
Section 7 Co-operation
Section 8 Binding Effect
Section 9 Severability of Clauses
Section 10 Save Harmless
SCHEDULES
Schedule "A"
Schedule "B"
Schedule "C"
Schedule "0"
Schedule "E"
legal Description of lands
Site Plan
Deeds and Easements to be Conveyed
Itemized Estimate of Cost of Construction
Standard Township Letter of Credit
2
SITE PLAN CONTROL AGREEMENT
This Agreement made in quadruplicate this day of
accordance with Section 41 of the Planning Act.
2003, in
,..,
BETWEEN:
BEARD'S FARM SUPPLY LIMITED
..
Hereinafter called the "Owner"
PARTY OF THE FIRST PART
-and-
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
Hereinafter called the "Township"
PARTY OF THE SECOND PART
WHEREAS the Owner has applied to the Township of Oro-Medonte to permit the
construction of a 54' x 80' farm equipment storage shed on lands described in Schedule
"A", attached hereto;
AND WHEREAS the Township has enacted a By-law to provide for the designation of the
lands as a "Site Plan Control Area";
..
AND WHEREAS the Owner intends to develop the lands in accordance with the Site Plan
attached hereto as Schedule "B";
.
NOW THEREFORE This Agreement Witnesseth THAT in consideration of the mutual
covenants hereinafter contained, the parties hereto hereby covenant and agree as
follows:
3
1. COVENANTS BY THE OWNER
The Owner covenants and agrees as follows:
a) The Owner owns the subject lands described in Schedule "A", attached hereto,
and has provided the Township with a Registered Deed containing the legal
description of the subject lands.
b) This Agreement may be registered against title to these subject lands and shall
take priority over any subsequent registrations against the title to the subject lands.
c) No work shall be performed on the lands, nor any use made of the subject lands
with respect to the proposed development, except in conformity with all the
provisions of this Agreement.
d) The Owner shall, prior to the execution of this Agreement, obtain all necessary
permits and approvals from the Township and from all Ministries and Agencies,
including, but not limited to, the County of Simcoe.
e) The Owner shall, prior to the execution of this Agreement, pay all municipal taxes
and charges related to obtaining the approval of these lands for the intended use.
f) The Owner shall pay a refundable deposit for such reasonable costs as may be
involved to the Township in having its Solicitor, Engineer, Planner and staff,
perform any work in connection with this Agreement, including the preparation,
drafting, execution, and registration of this Agreement. The Owner acknowledges
and agrees that the Owner shall be responsible for the cost of performance of all
the Owner's obligations hereunder, unless the context otherwise requires. Every
provision of this Agreement, by which the Owner is obligated in any way, shall be
deemed to include the words "at the expense of the Owner", unless specifically
stated otherwise. The refundable deposit for expenses and actual cost shall be
$1,000.00. The Owner shall replenish the refundable deposit, to its full amount,
when the expenses and actual costs are submitted by the Township.
g) The Owner shall have delivered to the Township, all TransferslDeeds, Discharges
and Easements, or other documents required by Schedule "C", as well as
certification from the Owner's Solicitor that the Transfer/Deeds and Easements
shall provide the Township with good title, free and clear from all encumbrances.
2. COVENANTS BY THE TOWNSHIP
The Township covenants and agrees as follows:
a)
That the Township has enacted a By-law to permit the construction of a 54' x 80'
farm equipment storage shed described on the Site Plan.
......
b)
That the Township agrees that subject to compliance by the Owner with all
relevant Municipal By-laws and Provincial Statutes and Regulations, the Owner
may proceed to develop the subject lands, as indicated on the Site Plan attached
hereto as Schedule "B", subject to the development restrictions contained herein.
,.
3. DEVELOPMENT RESTRICTIONS
The Parties hereto acknowledge and agree that any use of the subject lands by the
Owner shall be on and subject to the following terms and conditions:
4
a) Site Plan
The use and development of the subject lands shall be
in accordance with and as set out on the Site Plan,
attached hereto as Schedule "B".
('\ b) Lighting
All lighting systems installed outside, such as floodlights, shall be
. directed away from any adjacent residential use and/or roadway, not
to cause interference in any way.
c) Parking Areas and Driveways
All parking areas and driveways shall be constructed, in conformity
with Sections 5.19 and 5.20 of By~law No. 97-95, as amended, and
the Ontario Building Code Regulation #419/86, and such parking 1/
areas, loading and access areas shall be kept free and clear of snow
and ice and kept adequately drained. All entrances shall be
constructed, as in Schedule "B", attached. The Owner agrees to
obtain all necessary approvals from the Ministry of Transportation,
County of Simcoe and Township of Oro-Medonte.
d) Garbage Storage
The Owner agrees to provide suitable storage areas for garbage and
waste, as shown on the Site Plan, and to install and maintain litter :1;__,1
containers in and around development on the lands. All metal scrap
and associated refuse contained in the fenced compound shall be
removed on a weekly basis.
e) Landscaping
The Owner shall complete all landscaping and landscaped areas
shown on the Site Plan, attached as Schedule "B", as soon as
weather permits, and all grading and sodding required, according to
any Engineering drawings submitted, shall be done on all lawn
areas.
f) Erosion and Siltation Control
The Owner must take all necessary precautions to prevent erosion
and sedimentation of ditches and culverts, slopes, etc., within the
Site Plan, and downstream prior to and during construction. The
Owner agrees to maintain all erosion and siltation control devices in
. good repair until vegetative cover has been successfully established.
4. DEVELOPMENT CHANGES
The parties acknowledge and agree that there shall be no changes to this Agreement or
the Schedules attached hereto, unless and until such changes have been approved, in
writing, by all Parties.
5. SECURITY
Prior to signing the Agreement, the Owner will deposit with the Treasurer of the
Township, to cover the faithful performance of the obligations of the Owner arising under
this Agreement, including but not limited to the construction of the works and services
identified in Schedule "D" to this Agreement (the "said Work"), the following securities:
5
\
a) Cash in the amount of one hundred percent (100%) of the estimated cost of the
said work, as approved by the Township Engineer and Township Council, or:
b)
An irrevocable Letter of Credit from a Chartered Bank, issued in accordance with
the requirements of Schedule "E", with an automatic renewal clause in the amount
of one hundred percent (100%) of the estimated costs of the said works, and as
approved by the Township Engineer. The Letter of Credit shall be for a minimum
guaranteed period of one (1) year, or such time as the Township decides, and
shall be renewed automatically, as necessary, thirty (30) days prior to expiration.
c) The Township reserves the right to accept or reject any of these alternative
methods of providing securities. Prior to depositing the securities, the Owner's
Engineer shall submit an estimate of the cost of the works to the Township
Engineer for approval. When the cost estimate has been approved, it will be set
out in Schedule "0" of this Agreement and will become the basis for the limits of
the securities.
d) Any Letter of Credit or security filed with the Township is based upon the estimated
cost of completing the various matters prescribed by this Agreement. However, all
Letters of Credit and Security received by the Township may be used as security
for any item or any other matter which, under the terms of this Agreement, is the
responsibility of the Owner, including without limiting the generality of the
foregoing, payment of engineering, legal, planning or other costs incurred by the
Township, which are the responsibility of the Owner, under the terms of this
Agreement.
e) Upon written notification by the Owner's agent, certifying that all required works
for which the Letter of Credit was submitted have been completed in accordance
with the plans submitted and upon confirmation by the Township or its agent that
the Owner's obligations under this Agreement have been completed, the
Township will return said Letter of Credit.
f) If in the event of default of the Owner under any of the provisions of this
Agreement, it becomes necessary for the Township to realize on its security or
deposits, then the Township shall give, by registered mail, twenty-one (21) day's
notice, its intent to draw down on the security or deposit.
6. COMPLIANCE
Any action taken by the Township or on its behalf, pursuant to this Agreement, shall be in
addition to and without prejudice to any security or other guarantee given on behalf of the
Owner for the performance of its covenants and agreements herein, and upon default on
the part of the Owner hereunder, the Township shall, in addition to any other remedy
available to it, be at liberty to utilize the provisions of Section 325 of the Municipal Act,
R.S.O. 1980, Chapter 302, as amended.
7. CO-OPERATION
The Owner consents to the registration of this Agreement by the Township, upon the title
of the subject lands, at the expense of the Owner and agrees to execute such further and
other documents, consents or applications, as required, for the purpose of securing
registration and giving effect to the provisions of this Agreement.
8. BINDING EFFECT
This Agreement, and everything contained herein, shall be binding upon the successors
and assigns of the Parties hereto, and upon the lands described in Schedule "An,
attached hereto, such Schedule being a legal description of the lands, and it is further
agreed that this Agreement shall be prepared, approved and registered on title.
6
1"/
"
..
..
...
\ \1;-(=
9. SEVERABILITY OF CLAUSES
Should any Section, Subsection, Clause, Paragraph or Provision of this Agreement be
declared by a Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the same shall not affect the
validity of the Agreement as a whole or any part thereof, other than the provision so
declared to be invalid.
..
f'
10. SAVE HARMLESS
..
The Owner, on behalf of itself, its successors and assigns, agrees to indemnify and save
harmless, the Township from and against any and all claims, suits, actions and demands
whatsoever, which may arise either directly or indirectly by reason of any work or service
performed by the Township, its servants or sub-contractors in order to complete the work
or services required to be completed under this Agreement, provided the subject matter
of such action, suits, claims or demands was not caused intentionally or through gross
negligence on the part of the Township, its servants or agents or sub-contractors.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereunto have affixed their respective seals
under the hands of their proper officers duly authorized in that behalf.
SIGNED, SEALED AND DELIVERED
) Owner: BE RD'S FARM
) SUPPLY LIMITED
) John Beard
) Has the Authority to Bind the Corporation
)
)
)
)
)
) THE CORPORATION OF THE
) TOWNSHIP OF ORO.MEDONTE
)
) per:
)
)
)
) J. Neil Craig, Mayor
)
)
)
} Marilyn Pennycook, Clerk
)
.
~
7
SCHEDULE "A"
NOTE:
It is understood and agreed that this Schedule forms part of the Site Plan
Agreement between the Township of Oro-Medonte and Beard's Farm
Supply Limited.
..
.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF LANDS
Part E Y:z Lot 1, Concession 11, being Part 3, 51 R-12482 and Part 1, 51 R-18249, being
all of PIN #58529-0113 (Lt).
-
~,
8
NOTE:
.
,.,
..
SITE PLAN
SCHEDULE "B"
It is understood and agreed that this Schedule forms part of the Site Plan
Agreement between the Township of Oro-Medonte and Beard's Farm
Supply Limited.
Site Plan is not in a registerable form and is available from the Township of Oro-Medonte.
,.,
'"
9
SCHEDULE "C"
NOTE:
It is understood and agreed that this Schedule forms part of the Site Plan
Agreement between the Township of Oro-Medonte and Beard's Farm
Supply Limited.
.
.~
..
DEEDS AND EASEMENTS TO BE CONVEYED
All title documents shall be properly drawn and executed by the parties, with the
appropriate Lot or Block Number inserted in the description of the document, and the
registered Plan Number shall be left blank, to be inserted by the Solicitors for the
parties after the Plan is registered and a Plan Number assigned.
The consideration for all conveyances shall be the sum of Two Dollars ($2.00) and the
cost of preparation, execution and registration thereof, shall be borne by the Owner.
All documents to be registered, shall be prior approved by the Solicitor for the
Township.
The following land and easement shall be conveyed:
1.0 LANDS TO BE CONVEYED TO THE TOWNSHIP
N/A
2.0 DRAINAGE EASEMENTS TO BE CONVEYED TO THE TOWNSHIP
N/A
....
.....
10
(
" I
-j
SCHEDULE liD"
NOTE:
It is understood and agreed that this Schedule forms part of the Site Plan
Agreement between the Township of Oro-Medonte and Beard's Farm
Supply Limited.
.
f'
..
ITEMIZED ESTIMATE OF COST OF CONSTRUCTION
1.
ITEMIZE CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE
AMOUNT
N/A
2.
LETTERS OF CREDIT
AMOUNT
Letter of Credit to be provided by the Owner
to ensure completion of all works required
under the terms of this Agreement, as noted
in Section 5 herein,
N/A
.
)\
11
/7
THE CORPORA nON OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
BY-LAW NO. 2003-044
BEING A BY-LAW TO CONFIRM THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE COUNCIL
MEETING HELD ON WEDNESDAY, MAY 21, 2003.
.
A,
-
THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. THAT the action of the Council at its Council Meeting held on Wednesday,
May 21,2003, and in respect to each Motion, Resolution and other actions
passed and taken by the Council at its said Meeting is, except where prior
approval of the Ontario Municipal Board is required, hereby adopted, ratified and
confirmed.
2. THAT the Mayor and the proper Officials of the Township are hereby authorized
and directed to do all things necessary to give effect to the said action or to
obtain approvals where required and to execute all documents as may be
necessary on behalf of the Council of the Corporation of the Township of Oro-
Medonte. And, the Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to affix the corporate
seal to all said documents.
BY-LAW READ A FIRST AND SECOND TIME THIS 21st DAY OF MAY, 2003.
BY-LAW READ A THIRD TIME AND FINALLY PASSED THIS 21st DAY OF MAY,
2003.
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
..
Mayor, J. Neil Craig
.
""
Clerk, Marilyn Pennycook