Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
04 07 2020 Public Meeting - Agenda
The Township of Oro-Medonte Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment p � �a to the Zoning By-law of the Township of Oro-Medonte 0 ,r;��;,•-,�f���j� �, Council Chambers Proud llerit4,ge, Exciting Future Tuesday, April 7, 2020 5:30 p.m. Please note the Township will be holding another Public Meeting for the purpose of obtaining additional comments on a proposed amendment to the Township's Comprehensive Zoning By-law 97-95, to permit cannabis production and processing facilities within the Township of Oro-Me onte. Due to the evolving public health situation (COVID-19), effective March 17, 2020 at 8:30 am the Township of Oro® edonte Administration Office is closed to the general public until further notice. However, members of the community are invited to learn more and provide feedback on the proposed amendments through the input process outlined below. Meeting details are as follows: ProvideHow to rimeeting: 1. The Staff Presentation for the April 7th meeting will be posted on the Township website on Tuesday March 31, 2020. 2. Written submissions can be sent electronically to cannabis(c_oro-medonte.ca, can e dropped in the mail drop box at the Township Administration Office on Line 7 South, or faxed to (705)4 7-0133® Please ensurer r included as required i cr . 3. All comments received in the mail drop box at the Township Administration Office ail up to 5:00 p.m. on April 7th that include a name and address will be read out loud by staff during the April 7th meeting. 4. April 7 h meeting ® Will be live streamed for public viewing, o Will include Township staff presenting information (slides), which will also e posted on the Township wesite March 31st o All comments and questions received by e-mail to cannabis(a_oro- medonte.carior to or during the Public Meeting will be read out loud by staff. 5. Following the April 7th Public Meeting, the public can provide additional written submissions bye ail to cannabisQoro-medonte.ca or in the mail drop box at the Township Administration Office Drop Box until 4:30 p.m. on Tuesday April 14, 2020. 6. A compiled list of all communications received between March 18th and April 14t will be included in the public meeting minutes. 7. If you previously provided comments prior to, during or following the 1st Public Meeting held on December 17, 2019, your comments will continue to form part of the public record and will be considered, but will not be read out loud at the meeting on April 7th. 8. A Staff Report and revised by-law to be presented at a Special Council meeting on April 29, 2020. Page 1 of 327 Page 1. Opening of Meeting 2. Roll Call 3. Public Meeting: 3 - 327 a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zoning By-law of the Township of Oro-Medonte, Application 2019-ZBA-01, Cannabis Production and Processing Facilities, (Township of Oro-Medonte). 4. Adjourn Page 2 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zoning By-law of j,"i _"Aef-lroziie the Township of Oro-Medonte M"drna f Md Kw,Yy. !d".r,rn Application 2019-ZBA-01 Cannabis Production and Processing Facilities Take notice that the Council of the Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte will hold a Public Meeting on Tuesday,April 7, 2020 at 5:30 p.m. in the Municipal Council Chambers, 148 Line 7 South, Oro-Medonte, Ontario. The purpose of the Public Meeting is to obtain public comments on a proposed to Comprehensive Zoning By-law 97-95, under Section 34 of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990 c. P. 13. The purpose and effect of the proposed amendment is to establish regulations for cannabis production and processing facilities in the following zones: Rural Industrial (IR), Economic Development (ED), and Agricultural/Rural (A/RU)Zones. Background: a Public meeting was held on December 17, 2019 to review and obtain public input on a draft amendment to the Township's Zoning By-law to regulate Cannabis Production and Processing Facilities. Based on comments received, the draft by-law has been revised and is the subject of the April 7, 2020 Public Meeting. The revised draft by-law is available for review on the Township website (oro- medonte.ca)and the commenting period for the draft by-law shall close at the conclusion of the Public Meeting on April 7, 2020. Based on the public consultation, the by-law may be further revised prior to Council's final consideration at a future date. A key map illustrating the location of the subject lands is not provided as the proposed amendments to By-law 97-95 would apply to various lands within the geographic boundaries of the Township of Oro-Medonte. And take further notice that pursuant to Section 34 (10.7)of the Planning Act, the Application/Draft Zoning By-law Amendment is part of the public record and is available to the public for viewing/inspection between 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. at the Township of Oro-Medonte Administration Building, 148 Line 7 South, Oro-Medonte, Ontario.Any person wishing further information or clarification with regard to the application or to arrange to inspect the application should contact the Planning Division at 705-487-2171 or at planning@oro-medonte.ca. If you are submitting letters,faxes, emails, presentations or other communications with the Township concerning this application, you should be aware that your name and the fact that you communicated with the Township will become part of the public record. The Township will also make your communication and any personal information in it available to the public, unless you expressly request the Township to remove it. Any person may attend the public meeting and/or make written or verbal representation either in support of, or in opposition to, the proposed Amendment. If a person or public body that files an appeal of a decision of the Township of Oro-Medonte in respect of the proposed Amendment does not make oral submission at the Public Meeting, or make written submissions to the Township before the proposed Amendment is adopted, the Local Planning Appeals Tribunal (LPAT) may dismiss all or part of the appeal. If you wish to be notified of the decision of the Township of Oro-Medonte in respect to the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment, you must make a written request. Written submissions should be directed to: Township of Oro-Medonte 148 Line 7 South Oro-Medonte, Ontario LOL 2E0 plan ning@oro-medonte.ca Fax: 705-487-0133 Dated at the Township of Oro-Medonte this 18th day of March, 2020. Page 3 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... The Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte By-law No.2020-Draft A By-law to Amend Zoning By-law 97-95, as amended (Cannabis Production and Processing Facilities) Whereas the Council of the Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte is empowered to pass By-laws to regulate the use of land pursuant to Section 34 of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.P.13. And Whereas Council deems it appropriate to amend the zoning provisions of By-law 97-95, in accordance with the policies of the Official Plan; Now Therefore the Council of the Township of Oro-Medonte hereby enacts as follows: 1. That Section 3.0 Table A3— Industrial Zones Permitted Uses is amended by adding "Cannabis Production and Processing Facility"to the permitted uses in the Rural Industrial (IR)and Economic Development(ED)Zones. 2. That Section 4.0 Table B3—Standards for Industrial Zones is amended by the addition of the following: "Special Provisions: 1. A Cannabis Production and Processing Facility"in the Economic Development (ED)Zone or the Rural Industrial (IR)Zone shall also be subject to the following provision: Minimum setback from a Sensitive Land Use 150 metres" 3. That Section 6.0—Definitions is hereby amended by: a) Adding the following new definitions: "Cannabis Means a plant or any part thereof found in or derived from such a plant that belongs to the genus Cannabis." "Cannabis Production and Processing Facility Means any building or structure licensed and authorized by Health Canada to ship, deliver, transport, destroy, grow, dry, export and/or import cannabis for medical or non-medical purposes, including related research as defined an applicable Federal Regulation, as amended from time to time." "Sensitive Land Use Means an existing residential building, existing place of worship building, or lands containing or zoned to permit a public or private school, a day nursery, a public park, a public trail or a community centre." b) Adding the following sentence at the end of the definition of"Agricultural Use": "An Agricultural Use does not include a Cannabis Production and Processing Facility or the outdoor growing of Cannabis." c) Adding the following sentence at the end of the definition of"Agricultural Use, Specialized": "A Specialized Agricultural Use does not include a Cannabis Production and Processing Facility or the outdoor growing of Cannabis." 4. This By-law shall take effect on the final passing thereof, subject to the provisions of the Planning Act, as amended. Page 4 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... By-law read a First, Second and Third time, and Passed this day of , 2020. The Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte Mayor, H.S. Hughes Clerk,Yvonne Aubichon Page 5 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... � � W W Z m O N � W 'v � O O O N Q O ._ O L O O O _ 61 O _ *+ � N O = O ti O E _ 'C ._ o CL W Cv _ = O no E O a 61 3 IL WIN M O m = � O C = OW •- O N Page 6 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... cn O _ W O � N F= + Ca � o C: 0) cn o `~ U O � L h �_ O U Q -0a� o C) ( cn o •— O c .= v c -0 cn E N 0 0 0 0 C) C N � .c: 0- , ca O O a) 0)I� cn � rn o a) N o O N - O N U _ .0 Q z ON M O O 4- U .� - +� o E m o o U � .� U) vi = o _ � � -O -0 CU -Fz ova 0 : -04 � _0 � a) C)) o � � Ooo � a) 4- 0 U C: QQ t� O � c� ono ova � o M -0O +� '0 +� cn o +� W L .� M � •V i Q +� m C a) con ca U .U) O 0 CO M J 0 0 0 CO cn m a) O U c�n -� .v � U cn O Q a) U p = •> � O a) N M C v Page 7 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... � W IZ— U) U � .O N CO N c6 c6 U Q O E O cn U O L •� � O tt- O 0 `~ � -0 WN -00 N p - �. 0 .0 E — N � � ` — O -0 CD N U � C O v _ O •E N cn � O � •� .— cn � O ,�>, � cn cn N }' cn c6 U N � Q � N L � E E \ iCn a) (n CO a) a Q N O O70 CO O 0 V >, N D -0 N O Ca CMi �, `~ O O � O cn Q N a, E •� N 0 -0 - 'E •� > N c cOn m E Q a to 2 Page 8 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... O N cu 4-0 _0 U) ) -v C: •� M cU c CO O O CO 0 N � 0 � o W a) N }' L co 0O O N :3 U > _ :3 N to .0 O U 4--0 Q -- C U -(q 0O O � E CL M O _0 W N C: Ma) E o � Q � E >, N O .� N 100 C 0 N Ca N O •L -tn (6 CO U a -0 U) O m C Q �6 Page 9 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... 0 0 �p a N � U � c � T D o O ro s Q �✓ L O U O Q (p C a) ° o � CO t ° U o L 3 (Li ° ° 0) o o (B o o g - g o •3 s E . -0 jo 0 .2 0 Q O dI(p O_ X OL ° = a) -C CO LL O0 'aE .0 O+ CO m CO C 0a) r,amy � 0)y C � E C —O a) O — -OYE -a aS a) zU„ �o _CdCE 0 cn 0CU o ) U 0 o a) O d0 0- 0 aO) ll a) Co ( LO O -0 2- C � C -C N Q C: C O) ° p -- O ) — (n z CN 6 t dL V) .O C O) U) rO O N COa) N O a) a) C° w D a) C � a Ym 0 C Q 00 O 0) O M MC O' O O O a U fn �_ y O16- N 0L a_ N i .0 M (9 LO - j N � C6 C = O O 3 C O_ Y LL OC C p) C Ca U 0) � C)) N CO a ~ U2 E (o CO `� �o Q QQLL Q (na m0 i ? 2 U _ jE 3 0 � O (a U O .>1 Q. CD N - 0 N Q a5 p a3 C O a) ?' 0 L E O Q �_ m O T O� p OD C 0 a) N N C a3 (n (A C a N d a) E °) C U �. C = N O 0 > a) a3 E � U O y ? a — O > (4 p a5 O R Z M 0) cA p LO Q1 4) -C � = Np Q C N Q O NO — N° N O C n3 O `� I� y aU) 0 E 0 N m — O y s 0 a) C) 'w�6 3 C d rLn a) U) CD0 C a) U W 'O V p N �'p H i f6 (� .� C U C L O 'C) a) O CV m C a) C 0 .v o N a) �O N @ Z a 0 o M CO C o ayi 4— 3 O i/ C C C CO y C (n W ° C �, C a io m Q o o m y o o �, o I C a (� R Ea Q 2D -S Ma E I a) Q 0 Q r -0 E .Q0 CO C:N OO CO EO 'O U Q C U � — w 0 3 C � c co LU � 3 0 Y a) V N O C -0 H U -O O p L U CD a (Cp o 0 C a I H m " 0 ri a) CO o a) (� `o o Q 07 o 0 0CL � C = > m co O O_ (� U (' ._. O o M C C E C M U 3 U w M c 0 U a c N '° E o 0 (a o R -o 0 � � .0 a) C CO �5 � 0 rn `o 0 in 0 .o FU U p o c_ a) m rn m V a Q w Cn m a Vj ._ 0 r H 0' Q M Z N M 0 Page 10 of 327 ƒa) S3Opm. Notice o Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to meZo. > E k \ k QL k / �.g \ !E '(�I CO @ ) & 0 2 k \ E _ .s 2 \ \ ¥ $ \ 7 ( ¥ / 7 CY) L) •0 § \ m / 0 % k \� a) $ � � o k 2B C 0 0 � g I = 6 3 m % 0 / 0 3 U) 0 � / k CL 0 ( E § 2 7 J i / k E 0 _ « _ : • � c o » M D 0 0 $ / y ) " § � 0 »_ _ = 2 2 0 _ ® 7� � R R0 _ k 0 0 � 2 E D _0 q E 0) 0) 0)E $ £ 0 § / / \ 3 _0 �� � E 0 / [ 2 ? g 0 : § / E % / c E _0 E L) E C) £ o \ E 2 E o =0 0 2 k 0 / C:0 M � § 0 0 0 CU 2 E / � 2 7 % 20) 2 � 0 E m C: 0- m CDn � a) § _ ƒ D CO 0 \ 0 \ § �_ Q) E _ LU > x _ � 7 0 / k e E p n ¢ 6 n § a) CD © § c = 3 E @ 3 3 0 § 3 E / % § % E _ IM k F- } _ m 2 % 2 _�� _�— 0 2 \ @ 0 R 2 2 .� 7 z E CL 0) � k -- K \ I ® � ) Z3 CO ° � ® 3 § k = o w Of ± O CO 7 E § § � k " d 2 -0 U § D . . 2 U U = m 0 « % « E « \ Page 11 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... _ � � W W d = h _ 3 E E E E E E E E Q� w o 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 t� O d ■■ CO E E E E E E E Eo _ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a'! •_ o C o � ri � O = 3 " o N = v � oC a � 13 o _ Q v — N _ j, O O v y i CO M CO i G� m m CCL N 7N OCO y O O N N N M M W _ _ E E E E E E o o E E = o M � o c E E E E E N E -r- = - E E v c C: C: c c C: -a a) -0 � cX , , Page 12 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... ro W o x _..v O0001 fs h s 0 cri �0 ,00 ca cn d U - w E LU P, Q fs S�w'I10 ��► G`) tJJ �00 Rd -0111,,i/ o r f % Ui wo '// I //%j /O%✓f%i �fapa 7 V1 L��J/ii�ii ,?/l } Ca ra i W ' J 1 ai Q /% e i E .a�Zz- 40, LI oLU "' w 0 41 N _0 ra ca N Ln v M U aj, Q Q d Page 13 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... ro W U w 3 ilii/ v LIO 10 f / W ai T � r6 © / r ++ LLI 500 0000 110010 00 _ 4 ra LU /p aiCL t r,� Uj LU LU LLJ cli a) /* ro h O b Ln v U O Q d Page 14 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... ro W r s L- ai / 4-Jro '- �' s Cz Rt Ci Cali N 00 Ca L cc / ra w tir ai iCL /� i/ LU LU 4J N 10000 _0 LL M w f6 N N N M U aj, Q Q d Page 15 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... ro W N � r6 00, U }+ W bkw r-I /giiy <100110 Q Uj LLI /pii% a-JO r6N ro N ca ra LU L 4-J � it ^' �k CL 0 ai > q i%l� U �r y E 0 w -0 _0 LL o ,` 4J � L _ r N LA N di M U aj, o Q d Page 16 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... ro W U N U1 N ai /.ro ro �rl /ran { Y ca _0 !!� C6 % \, 0 0 w ai EAa CL ' . LU vi �/!,� — r � 4J N O — 000,10 L � a> e\ f s C? taA v � ra .N LA Ln v M U aj, Q Q d Page 17 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... ro W U rLn i///r �i�-� ca U / / N . �% ro ca }' Q o oc fi�c? CU Ca L _0 ra til w / Jlri' a + / 1 / W l ai r r CL E �� � br w O w f, —0 vi _0 L.L ' 4J qA / r (n LA N di M U aj, Q Q d Page 18 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... ro W U O � tN00/ Ip ra �% r /o ,\ ��j/ N �// Ui LUU C6 y /Y •ro Ci �UJ W 4--r �000010 CL a 01 1,000 � r w r M V: -' r —XV ,00 � co LL ai Ln v M U CU O Q d Page 19 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... ro W U O � --f Ln f,. M, ai d �Q a �� c6 m Ui Ui %r Vra a-J %%M UJ E CL Ui N ' /009 r/ f�M 0 ®�ry W -0 di Nyin _0 LL v k Ln W M U a) O Q d Page 20 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... C) 'a) >, O >_ _ m a) N ~ •a) (_� (n .. a) 'U � C N '> N 0 E � E ° O o CO� i o :3 c- CD O U a) U a) 0 0 0 -0 C: CO •0 (6 N -0 -0 U � a) O O 0 E 0- CMCMo }, -0 � a) � cU aN C 0� 0 � o o CO CO � U � � a) c� M C CO o -0 U) a) " -0 a) L- -0 > O CO M � O x •O a) U U Q O cmN a) O N E "O z � Q0 Page 21 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... � W h 0 01 -_ W N li N a-+ p .� i f/Y ■� O 14» O VI O -0 O N O � 'i r V O O E a Sn o O Q -0 N C E �O CAC O V y E cc� bo a E 3 � 0O C) IV L E C) ^ N EQ � O �c� - C O C u� LL V Page 22 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... � W h 00 y O O O O 4� O CY Page 23 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo April 7", 2020 To Mayor Hughes, Council Members and Planning Staff, We are residents of Oro-Medonte and have lived here for four years with our three children. We have reviewed the amended draft cannabis by-law and would like to express that it is important to distinguish that hemp should be included in the definition of cannabis. We have asked Angela Baldwin, a planning and development consultant to review the draft bylaw and have attached her comments to this letter which we would request staff consider in their review of the document. Cannabis is a relatively new industry sector that doesn't have a track record or history in how it affects public health or the environment. Allowing cannabis processing and production facilities on agricultural lands would be poor planning and would compromise community balance and quality of life. We have learned from other Ontario communities and in the US that the pervasive odour is a major concern. Research has not proven that these odours are safe. The smell can be pungent and depending on the wind direction, can carry for more than five kilometres. The odour can cause people to experience headaches and an overall feeling of un- wellness. Another serious concern is water quality and supply. Our home's water supply is a well. The run-off from higher ground comes onto our property through a stream that flows directly into Lake Simcoe. The vast quantity of water required for cannabis growth and processing is unknown as well as the disruption to aquifers and potential for compromised drinking water. We would be very concerned about the impact of a larger water user like a cannabis operation on the quality of ground water and the impact on our well. Generator noise is an issue that is not only disruptive to residents but also wildlife. Agricultural lands provide a habitat for wildlife. Generator noise, security fencing and artificial lighting would Inhibit and compromise wildlife Homeowners put the lion's share of their savings into building a home. Placing this business close to homes will irreversibly de-value people's savings and homes. We don't want our beautiful township and waterfront to be unduly impacted by these types of incompatible operations In residential areas. These uses are much better suited to Industrial land where the impacts will be reduced and which accommodate processing operations, NOT on agricultural lands. We commend planning staff and council for drafting the amended by-law to restrict Cannabis and Hemp Processing and Production facilities to Rural Industrial and Economic Development lands and fully support the draft cannabis bylaw. w. Ja on anc0ennifer O'Neill 1735 Ridge Road West Oro Medonte, LOL 21-0 Page 24 of 327 otice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo 3 Barrie Terrace, Barrie, ON L4M 1 E8 8', F� (705)7 39-0071 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS angela,baldwin(c--�)rogers,corT) fl k(416)578-3297 April 6, 2020 Mr. Derek Witlib Manager of Planning Services Planning Department Township of Oro Medonte 148 Line 7 South Oro Medonte LOL 2EO Dear Derek, Proposed Draft Zoning Bylaw To Regulate Cannabis Production and Processing Facilities In Township of Oro- Medonte We have reviewed the draft zoning by law to regulate cannabis production and processing facilities on behalf of Jennifer and Jason O'Neill who reside at 1735 Ridge Road West. We support the municipalities' intent to restrict cannabis production and processing facilities to the Rural Industrial (IR) and Economic Development (Eft) zones which are generally better separated from residential uses and where the impacts such as noise, dust, odour, traffic and outdoor illumination can be regulated under site plan control. We have the following specific comments on the draft bylaw for your consideration: 1. Section 3 a) Add the words "or hemp"after "Connabis'such that it reads: "Cannabis Means a plant or any part thereof found in or derived from such a plant that belongs to the genus Cannabis or hemp" 2. Section 3 a Cannabis Production and Processing Facility definition Add the words "lands" between "any" and Building " on the first line of the definition and add the words, "process, store and test" after the words, destroy on the second line of the definition and change the word "an"to "in" on the 3 rd line of the definition such that it would read: Page 25 of 327 ........... .......... 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo "Means any lands, building or structure, licensed and authorized by Health Canada to ship, deliver, transport, destroy,process, store, test, grow, dry, export and/or import cannabis for medical or non medical purposes, including related research as defined in applicable Federal Regulation, as amended from time to time," 3. Section 3b) Add the words "or hemp"at the end of the section so that it reads; "Adding the following sentence at the end of the definition of "'Agricultural Use"° "An Agricultural Use does not include a Cannabis Production and Processing Facility or the outdoor growing of Cannabis or hemp." 4. Section 3c) Adding the words "storage or production"after the words "outdoor growing" on line three of this section and the words "or hemp" after the words "Cannabis" at the end of the section such that it reads: "Adding the following sentence at the end of the definition of"Agricultural Use, Specialized"; "A Specialized Agricultural Use"does not include a Cannabis Production and Processing Facility or the use of outdoor growing, storage or production of Cannabis or Hemp-". We thank you for your consideration of these amendments of the bylaw. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or require additional information. Regards, Angela Baldwin, MCIP, RPP c.c. Jennifer O'Neill Page 26 of 327 .................. ......... 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From:Justin Porter<jmjporter@gmail.com> Sent:April 7, 2020 4:24 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Cannabis Zoning By-law Amendment I would like to thank the Mayor and Council for their diligent work concerning the By-law Amendment for Cannabis Production and Processing Facilities. In follow-up to my January 31st correspondence, I would like to express my support for excluding Cannabis Production and Processing Facilities or the outdoor growing of Cannabis on lands zoned A/RU. Regarding the "Special Provision" for Economic Development and Rural Industrial zones, please consider changing the "Minimum setback from a Sensitive Land Use" from 150 metres to not less than 300 metres. I feel this would better buffer any potential negative impacts, such as noise, lights, odours, traffic, and waste, from such facilities. Respectfully, Dr. Justin Porter 7 Jenna Court, Shanty Bay Page 27 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From:JOHN MCLELLAN <mclellanl075@yahoo.ca> Sent:April 7, 2020 4:21 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Re Shanty Bay Cannabis proposal. To Council Members of Oro-Medonte My wife and I have been residents of Oro-Medonte since 2011 and deeply appreciate the community that we live in. Even taking the short drive from the city of Barrie to our home at the bottom of Line 4 gives us the uplift and refreshment that comes with driving along the peaceful country roads of Oro. This is an atmosphere that we must preserve for all of our community. There are many concerns of a technical nature that are being raised by knowledgeable people:, issues pertaining to the impact of this proposal on well water, runoff into the lake, air pollution,effect of lights on nearby homes, increased commercial traffic, and a significant intrusion into the agricultural focus of this area. As someone not versed in these technical Issues, I can only join their voices in raising my concern that the proposed development will negatively impact our region. We are strongly against this proposed development being located in Shanty Bay. We ask that this council will move to preserve this unique community and the environment we appreciate and seek to protect. A location where there would be minimal intrusion into the community and less impact on the water supplies of the residents would be to the benefit of all parties. With Regards, John & Marny McLellan 44 Brambel Rd., Oro=Medonte, ON LOL 2L0 Phn: 705 792=5431 Page 28 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... Shanty Bay Estates Ltd. 9 Grandview Crescent, Bradford, Ontario. L3Z 31_1 email: hulst@xplornet.com April 7, 2020 His Worship Mayor Harry Hughes and Honourable members of Council of The Township of Oro-Medonte, 148 Line 7, Oro-Medonte, Ont. LOL 2E0 Dear members of Council, Re: Conc. 3, Part of Lots 26 and 27 Plan 51R-32764 Part 1 and 51R-33758 Part 1 Activities contrary to your By-Laws. I am the owner of Shanty Bay Estates Ltd. Who owns a property approx. 67.4 acres in size on Ridge Road and Line 3. I have been contacted by various adjoining neighbours upon my early return from Florida and made aware of major activities taking place immediately west of my property. Is this activity taking place with the approval of Council? Was a permit applied for and granted under By-Law 2016-056 as amended by By-Law 2017- 046? For grading, site alterations, removal of trees on the lands and ROW, construction of a major pond and gravel parking lot, digging of wells, etc. My neighbours and I are concerned that the owner of the property 2541005 Ontario Ltd. (Wyfield Group) and its president Yuanil Yang intend to use the property for the purpose of growing and the production of Cannabis. Unfortunately I have been ordered to be in quarantine but I have been forwarded videos and photographs of the activities on the subject property. This problem exists throughout the province and numerous municipalities are taking steps to prevent these operations in the agricultural zones i.e.: Chartham-Kent, West Lincoln, Leamington, King and Bradford-West Gwillimbury. No owner of lands spends this amount of monies altering their property, unless they are of the opinion that they will be successful in those activities. Possibly by by-passing the Municipality and obtain approval by the Province. If this operation is allowed to continue, my corporation and the adjacent homeowners in and around the surrounding subdivisions will suffer major financial losses as a result of the odours from the growth and manufacturing of the Cannabis. Wells in the area will also suffer and may go dry. Kindly forward copies of all permits, decisions and correspondence, including any stop work orders and/or intend to take legal steps. Respectfully submitted, Shanty Bay Estates Ltd. Fred Picavet, president. Cc. my planner: MHBC planning, solicitor: David White, Esq. Page 29 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Eileen Carl <etwrightcarl@gmail.com> Sent:April 7, 2020 3:50 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject:Approval for By-Law Changes To Oro-Medonte Council From Eileen and Martin Carl, 7 Melissa Crescent, Oro Medonte This letter is to ask in the strongest terms that Council approve the proposed amendment to the zoning by-law regarding the growing or related production facilities in Oro-Medonte Township. We do not think it is an appropriate use of land for the growing and/or processing of cannabis since this land is close to homes, nature trails, a school, church and community centre. We are deeply saddened and shocked that so many beautiful and mature trees were taken down. If the landowners have violated any bylaws, regulations or requirements with respect to taking down these trees, we would ask that this matter be pursued. Thank you for your consideration. Respectfully, Eileen and Martin Carl Page 30 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo From: Isabella Genovese <bellagenovese@rogers.com> Sent:April 7, 2020 3:40 PIVI To: Planning<Planning@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Dear Oro Medonte Planning Department, Town Council, and Mayor Hughes, My name is Rachel Stirling and I have lived in Oro—Medonte for 17.5 years. Thank you for your efforts in making the required amendments to the cannabis by-law to ensure it would prohibit Cannabis, including Hemp, in a//agriculture zones in Oro-Medonte. A crop that requires high fencing, security, excessive water consumption and disturbs residents'quality of life with a pervasive odour, excessive noise, and artificial lighting, does not belong on lands that are close to residential settings. It belongs in an industrial land. Thank you for your leadership. I support the amended cannabis by-low. Sincerely, Rachel Stirling Page 31 of 327 3.a) 5:U p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... S 0, AFR 0 7 7021 Ile' .� u v C1 f� `�=,</ .� _ - Cry Ci_�L���' �✓ ». „ Y w r Page 32 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: wayne.kim <wayne.kim@rogers.com> Sent:April 7, 2020 2:59 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca>; Planning<Planning@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: FW: PUBLIC COMMENTTO BE READ AT CANNABIS PUBLIC MEETING APRIL 7th , 2020 PLEASE - W. Lintack From: ayrn .Vcun gg.Es,.!g2l Sent:April 7, 2020 2:47 PM To: 'Hughes, Harry' <harrY a 2>; 'Hough, Ralph' < 111 @_ -medonte ca>;: p _ 'Greenlaw, Randy' <rarud .gr g_gnlaw aro m donte ca>; 'Scott, Shawn' <s_Vawn.s p_tt..�pro M.9dont� 'Keane, Cathy' < a_tlhy..lk ineC_ irp:.:inn_ a�onte ca>; 'Veitch, Ian' <p_a_E.._veJtch@oro mnodoitit >; 'tammy.desousa@oro-medonte ca' <tmrnyd� pus�agg. -.dp.2te ca>I _ ' s Cc: 'Witlib, Derek'<dv� ti o.b..@oiro.-med_onte ca> Subject: PUBLIC COMMENT TO BE READ AT CANNABIS PUBLIC MEETING APRIL 7th , 2020 PLEASE -W. Lintack Hello OM Staff and Council , I would like to thank you both for including a prohibition on the production and processing of cannabis on A/RU zoned lands in OM in the Draft 2 By-Law . However, according to the recent comments from OMAFRA to New Tecumseth Township, and more recently comments from OMAFRA directly to OM Township planners, in my opinion, what OM is proposing in the Draft 2 by-law is contrary to the OMAFRA interpretation of the Planning Act and the 2014 Provincial Policy Statement around the growing and processing of cannabis on agricultural lands in Ontario . I also think it is unreasonable to think the owners of a property near Shanty Bay,where residents believe a cannabis facility is under construction , would have likely spent million dollars to date without some sort of government approval or assurance they were on the right track,verbally or in writing . Assuming the OMAFRA position in the New Tecumseth Staff report, and in the recent communication directly to OM planning staff from OMAFRA is accurate, I am concerned OM is limited to two options in the future : 1. Capitulate sooner or later and strike the provision from the By-law that prohibits the growth and processing of cannabis on A/RU lands and only end up with some minimal setbacks that are really meaningless in addressing the concerns of ratepayers around noise,odor and light pollution . 2. Go into this realizing this matter will be taken by potential proponents ( and maybe OMAFRA ) to what I still like to refer to as the "OMB" , or some higher and more immediate court proceeding, and OM will have to retain experts and take on a hard core precedence setting battle against potential proponents,the Province of Ontario ( 2014 PPS under the Planning Act) , OMAFRA and perhaps Health Canada to defend against the growing and processing cannabis on A/RU Zoned properties in OM . Page 33 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... As a result, I am requesting OM develops and adopts a plan B so residents are not hung out to dry if OM cannot prohibit cannabis production and processing on A/RU lands .This Plan B would include strict provisions under the Building Code Act ( BCA) and the Property Standards By-Law under the BCA, in addition to more meaningful setbacks to "Sensitive Land Uses " . As for part of the Plan B, I am requesting setbacks of 500m from the SECURITY FENCING of any cannabis facility to the LOT LINE of any"Sensitive Land Use " . Meridian Planning noted in the attached report that other municipalities have 500m setbacks established in their by-laws . Why not OM ? Let's face it, no building permit in OM should = NO building of cannabis greenhouses and production facilities anywhere in OM ! No building permit should be issued and no final occupancy should be approved without OM requiring the installation and use of the most expensive and most technological advanced (non by-passable ) mitigation equipment ( as recommended by an expert consultant in the field to OM ) available to mitigate at least noise, light and smell to the highest standards possible . No building permit should also be issued prior to the installation of Phase 3 hydro to the property. If OM cannot prohibit the growth and production of cannabis on AR/U lands , make it so expensive to build a facility here they will go somewhere else, or if they are already engaged grind them to mitigate to the most advanced way possible to reduce the impact on ratepayers . The technology existed 20 years ago to mitigate cannabis odor, no one smelled pot coming out of the huge illegal grow at Molson's plant in Barrie or the thousands of other indoor illegal grows in residential houses which occasionally got picked off through the usage or theft of hydro. According to the website of OM own legal council (as attached),the State of Emergency Order made by Premier Ford has declared that all statutes of limitation related to any by-law, which would include the OM Cannabis Interim Control By-law, are currently suspended . Given three is no immanent rush to pass a Cannabis By-law in OM , I am also requesting Meridian Planning be retained as an independent third party by OM to produce a report on the "Detailed Considerations for Regulating Cannabis in OM ", similar to the attached for Selwyn Township . In my opinion, if OM Planning Staff only contacted OMAFRA after March 23,2020 when I brought the New Tecumseth/OMAFRA correspondence to their attention, the background , research and analysis that went into both Draft 1 and Draft 2 of the OM Cannabis by-laws were not thorough enough to justify the recommended options given to council . In my opinion, more importantly, OM ratepayers that will be potentially adversely impacted by cannabis production and processing in OM deserve a properly crafted "OM Cannabis Background Study "like the attached report done by Selwyn Township by Meridian Planning, so they can participate in a Public Consultation Process in an informed and meaningful manner . Thanks Wayne Lintack Page 34 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... 50 Ridge Road East Oro-Medonte . Page 35 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... *derat*ons for Consi I Regulating Cannabis 'in the Township of Selwyn DRAFT � r t � � i % uN r ifu I t i i I !Jill „jSeptember 2019 S e w, ,r Dili/ f �i>rr uu 11 / I I fui�i J i Muuvvu>v�w I � u��unu I>�V�IIlglll�ll9. @o iNV �I i 4 " �1I"11 �N III I�� Page 36 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amelrvdm ien Zo... S e I w,�n' Table of Contents 1.The Federal Cannabis Act and Regulation-----------------------------------------------------------------------------3 1.1. Classes of Licences--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------5 1.2. Licence Permissions-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------6 1.2.1 Licence for Cultivation-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------6 1.2.2. Licence for Processing-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------7 1.2.3. Licence for Analytical Testing--------------------------------------------------------------------------------8 1.2.4. Licence for Sale of Cannabis for Medical Purposes ----------------------------------------------------8 1.2.5. Licence for Research-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------8 1.2.6. Cannabis Drug Licence ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------8 1.3. Retail Sales------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------9 1.4. Role of Municipality in Licensing Process-------------------------------------------------------------------11 1.5. Impacts of Federal Legislation and Regulation on the Establishment of Land Use Controls--12 2. Regulatory Considerations for the Township of Selwyn -----------------------------------------------------14 2.1. Introduction --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------14 2.2. Odour Concerns----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------14 2.2.1. Public Health Ontario----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------14 2.2.2. Provincial Policies to Consider ----------------------------------------------------------------------------16 2.3. Social Considerations --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------18 3. Policy Considerations--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------19 3.1. Provincial Policy Statement------------------------------------------------------------------------------------19 3.1.1. Agricultural and Rural Areas-------------------------------------------------------------------------------19 3.2. Official Plan---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------24 3.2.1. Rural Area------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------25 3.2.2. Urban Area-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------30 3.3. Township Zoning By-law----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------33 3.3.1. Agriculture and Rural Zones-------------------------------------------------------------------------------33 3.3.2. Industrial Zones-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------35 4. Preliminary Options for the Township to Consider------------------------------------------------------------38 4.1. Updates to the Official Plan------------------------------------------------------------------------------------39 4.1.1. Agriculture and Rural Designations----------------------------------------------------------------------39 4.1.2. Industrial Designation---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------40 4.1.3. Definitions------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------40 4.2. Updates to the Zoning By-law---------------------------------------------------------------------------------41 4.2.1. Need for Definitions-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------41 4.2.2. Include Setbacks in the Zoning By-law------------------------------------------------------------------41 4.2.3. Other Considerations----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------42 Draft Considerations for Regulating Cannabis in the Township of Selwyn E R""1111)1j N 2 September 3, 2019 Page 37 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amelrvdm ien Zo... S e I w,�n' Ilintir u ti o On January 17, 2019,the Council of the Township of Selwyn passed a resolution (2019-002)to: • Advise the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (AGCO) that the Township of Selwyn opts into allowing Cannabis retail stores; • Adopt the Municipal Cannabis Retail Policy Statement (MCRPS); • Delegate authority to staff to respond to the AGCO retail sales application notice, in accordance with the MCRPS; • Direct staff to undertake a study regarding the regulation of cannabis cultivation and processing related land uses in the Township; and, • Enact an Interim Control By-law (By-law 2019-001) that applies to the entire Township to prohibit cannabis cultivation and processing facilities within the Township until the municipality is able to develop policies/regulations that would ensure that such facilities are appropriately situated and regulated within the Township. On the basis of the above, Meridian Planning Consultants (MPC) were retained by the Township of Selwyn to undertake a study on the regulation of cannabis cultivation and processing related land uses within the Township. In this regard,the purpose of this Report is to: • Document the current status of the Federal regulatory environment; • Determine how Provincial implementation is supposed to occur; • Provide a review of how other municipalities are dealing with cannabis cultivation and processing; • Complete a review of the planning issues and policy considerations related to cultivation and processing; and, • Identify preliminary options for consideration. In order to achieve the above objectives, there is a need to firstly establish the parameters of the review. In this regard,this Report is divided into the following components: Part 1—The Federal Cannabis Act and Regulation; Part 2— Regulatory Considerations for the Township of Selwyn; Part 3—Permitting Cannabis Related Uses in the Township of Selwyn; and, Part 4—Preliminary Options for the Township to Consider. L 'The Federalnn i t and ul tiu n On April 13, 2017, the Government of Canada introduced Bill C-45 (the Cannabis Act) in the House of Commons. Based in large part on the advice provided by the Task Force on Cannabis Legalization and Regulation, the Cannabis Act created the foundation for a comprehensive national framework to provide restricted access to regulated cannabis, and to control its production, distribution, sale, importation, exportation, and possession. Draft Considerations for Regulating Cannabis in the Township of Selwyn E,�u"111^)1i 3 September 3, 2019 Page 38 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amervdm ien Zo... S e I w,�n' Following parliamentary review, the Cannabis Act received royal assent on June 21, 2018 and it became law on October 17, 2018. As set out in section 7 of the Cannabis Act, the purpose of the Cannabis Act is to protect public health and public safety and in particular to: • Protect the health of young persons by restricting their access to cannabis; • Protect young persons and others from inducements to use cannabis; • Provide for the legal production of cannabis to reduce illegal activities in relation to cannabis; • Deter illegal activities in relation to cannabis through appropriate sanctions and enforcement measures; • Reduce the burden on the criminal justice system in relation to cannabis; • Provide access to a quality-controlled supply of cannabis; and, • Enhance public awareness of the health risks associated with cannabis use. In order to achieve the above,the Cannabis Act: • Creates a general control framework for cannabis by establishing a series of criminal prohibitions, while providing for exceptions or authorizations to permit persons to engage in otherwise prohibited activities; • Provides for the oversight and licensing of a legal cannabis supply chain; • Provides for licences and that will set parameters for the operation of a legal cannabis industry; • Indicates that Federal and Provincial/territorial governments will share responsibility for the oversight and licensing of the cannabis supply chain and that the federal Minister of Health will be responsible for licensing, among other activities, the production of cannabis (cultivation and processing), while Provincial and territorial governments can authorize the distribution and retail sale of cannabis in their respective jurisdictions; and, • Establishes national standards to protect public health and safety through the creation of a number of legal requirements that are intended to protect against the public health and public safety risks associated with cannabis. It should be noted that by virtue of the enactment of the Cannabis Act, the Access to Cannabis for Medical Purposes Regulations (ACMPR) was repealed when the Cannabis Act became law on October 17, 2018. All producers with a licence (commercial and personal use) under the ACMPR are allowed to continue operating until their existing licences expire, at which time they will have to apply for a licence under the new Federal Regulation. The Federal Cannabis Regulation SOR-2018-144 ('the Regulation') was published in the Canada Gazette, Part II, on July 11, 2018. The Regulation is actually dated June 27, 2018 and it also came into effect on October 17, 2018. This Regulation is one of a series of regulations that are intended to implement the Draft Considerations for Regulating Cannabis in the Township of Selwyn E,�u"111^)1i 4 September 3, 2019 Page 39 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amelrvdm ien Zo... S e I w,�n' Cannabis Act. 1.1.ClassesLicences Section 8(1) of the Regulation establishes a series of 6 classes of licences that authorize activities that are related to cannabis and these are as follows: • A licence for cultivation; • A licence for processing; • A licence for analytical testing; • A licence for sale (medical purposes); • A licence for research; and, • A cannabis drug licence. Section 8(3) of the Regulation includes a series of 3 subclasses of a licence for cultivation have also been established and they are: • A licence for micro-cultivation; • A licence for standard cultivation; and, • A licence for a nursery. In addition, Section 8(4) of the Regulation includes 2 subclasses of a licence for processing: • A licence for micro-processing; and, • A licence for standard processing. These classes of licences are new and have an impact on the regulation of various components of any cannabis-related land use in the Township of Selwyn. Additionally, multiple licences can be held by one person or company, creating the potential for cultivation, processing and other licenced activities to occur on the same site. The Licensed Producers of Canada (LPC) provides in-depth coverage of Canada's licensed producers of Cannabis products. According to LPC, there are 96 producers with one or more cannabis licences in Ontario.The table below provides a summary of the number of licences by type of licence. Type of Licence Number of Licences Cultivation 80 Processing 71 Analytical Testing 1 Sale (Medical Purposes) 60 Research 1 It is noted that there are 59 producers that hold both a licence for cultivation and for processing. Draft Considerations for Regulating Cannabis in the Township of Selwyn E,�u"111^)1j 5 September 3, 2019 Page 40 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amelrvdm ien Zo... S e I w,�n' Below is a description of the licence permissions for each type of licence set out in the Regulation. 1.2.LicencePermissions 1.2 1. I� uu c n c e °Ifo t C t uu)f')��v at i�iii:)n Cultivation can occur indoors or outdoors and the plants can be rooted in the native soils. If grown indoors, it would be typically grown in a greenhouse type building as shown below on the left. If grown outside, it would have the appearance of a typical cash crop as shown below on the right. In accordance with Section 11(1) of the Regulation, the holder of a licence for micro-cultivation and standard cultivation is permitted to: • Possess cannabis; • Obtain dried cannabis, fresh cannabis, cannabis plants or cannabis plant seeds by cultivating, propagating and harvesting cannabis; • For the purpose of testing, to obtain cannabis by altering its chemical or physical properties by any means; and, • Sell cannabis. In accordance with Section 11(5) of the Regulation, the holder of a licence for micro-cultivation or standard cultivation can sell cannabis to: • The holder of other licences established by the Regulation; and, • Certain persons that have been granted an exemption under the Cannabis Act (such as for medical reasons for example). However, it does not appear as if the holder of a licence for micro-cultivation or standard cultivation is authorized to sell cannabis to the general public from the facility. This means that general retail sales would not be permitted on a site where cultivation is occurring. Section 13(1) of the Regulation describes the threshold for a micro-cultivation. The difference between a licence for micro-cultivation and standard cultivation is that the surface area for a licence for micro- cultivation cannot exceed 200 square metres in which all cannabis plants, including all the parts of the Draft Considerations for Regulating Cannabis in the Township of Selwyn E,�u"111^)1j N 6 September 3, 2019 Page 41 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amervdm ien Z0... S e I w,�n' plants, must be contained. Section 14(1) of the Regulation indicates that the holder of a licence for a nursery (which is a subclass of a licence for cultivation) is allowed to carry on the activities of a holder of a licence for micro- cultivation or standard cultivation, except they are not able to obtain dried cannabis or fresh cannabis. In other words, only cannabis plants or cannabis plant seeds can be used for growing cannabis in a nursery. If the holder of a licence for a nursery cultivates cannabis for the purpose of obtaining cannabis plant seeds, the total surface area that can be devoted to this purpose cannot exceed 50 square metres, as set out in Section 16(1) of the Regulation. Some of the facilities that have been constructed in the past year are very large, such as the Aurora Sky facility in Edmonton that has an approximate floor area of about 75,000 square metres (which is equivalent to about one third of the lands designated for industrial use in the Township of Selwyn). The Aurora Sky facility as shown on the right. Based on the example noted above, such a facility Rill 11 shares many of the characteristics of an industrial or warehouse building. However, most of the building has the appearance of a greenhouse, as shown in the photos below. wri WV It is noted that the size of the Aurora Sky facility shown above is at the high end and that many of the other known facilities are considerably smaller. ��:�...7 7 1�����uii �m���������''�ii,1i�';��!^ fiiii„�iiii IIII:)roc sS(iing As mentioned at the end of Section 1.1 in this Report, nearly two thirds of licence holders in Ontario have obtained both a licence for cultivation and a licence for processing. In this regard, both activities can take place in the same building and/or on the same property. Two types of licences have been established for processing — standard processing and micro processing. Section 17(1) and (2) of the Regulation establish the authorized activities for processing and Draft Considerations for Regulating Cannabis in the Township of Selwyn E I""I 111)1 jk N 7 September 3, 2019 Page 42 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amelrvdm ien Z0... S e I w,�n' micro-processing licences, respectively. In both circumstances, the licence does not allow the cultivation, propagation or harvesting of cannabis. In other words, a processing licence only allows the licence holder to produce cannabis for sale and to sell cannabis. The difference between a standard processing licence and a micro-processing licence is that no more than 600 kilograms of dried cannabis can be sold or distributed in a calendar year with a micro- processing licence, as described in Section 21(1) of the Regulation. 1.2����,�I�°J a �����III�"�����iI'u!m�v for �I�'.IIP�� iiIP���1� 0 IIIIi''�III�'�"� Section 22(1) of the Regulation indicates that the holder of a licence for analytical testing is authorized to possess cannabis and to obtain cannabis by altering its chemical or physical properties by any means. The sale or distribution of any product from the holder of a licence for analytical testing is not permitted and there are rules on how long cannabis can be kept on site before it needs to be destroyed. For example, Section 25(1) of the Regulation requires the holder of a licence for analytical testing to destroy all samples of cannabis within 90 days of completing the testing of samples. The holder of this licence may also have other licences. 1,,,Ac,e'�i fiic°uii' " a IIIIC Iirf Ca i i Whb is "for IIII\d e icW1 IIII�)t,u q oSeS Section 26 of the Regulation indicates that the holder of a licence for sale of cannabis for medical purposes is permitted to possess cannabis products and to sell cannabis products. Section 27 of the Regulation permits the sale of cannabis for medical purposes to other types of licence holders, a person to whom an exemption has been granted under the Cannabis Act or to a hospital employee. The holder of this licence may also have other licences. 1..��21 "t k���,ence °Ifiili'�'ui't IIII:te'm eaiirdllh°m Section 28(1)(a) describes the authorized activities for the holder of a licence for research and permits the holder to possess cannabis, produce cannabis or transport, send or deliver cannabis between the sites that are established by the licence. Additionally, the licence holder can sell cannabis plants and cannabis plant seeds to other licence holders,the Minister or a person to whom an exemption has been granted under the Cannabis Act, as described in Section 28(1)(b) of the Regulation. As is the case with other licences described above, the holder of this licence may also have other licences. 1.. tlIY IIII IIII iie IIII s Drug L.....IIII6, Section 140(1) indicates that the holder of a cannabis drug licence is permitted to possess cannabis and Draft Considerations for Regulating Cannabis in the Township of Selwyn E I""I 111)1 jk N 8 September 3, 2019 Page 43 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amervdm ien Z0... S e I w,�n' produce or sell a drug containing cannabis. Section 143(1) of the Regulation permits the holder of a cannabis drug licence to sell or distribute the drug to other types of licence holders, a person to whom an exemption has been granted under the Cannabis Act or to a pharmacist, a practitioner or a hospital employee. 1.3.Retails The Regulation does not deal with the retail sale of cannabis to the general public. This is because the responsibility for establishing a distribution system and retail sale network is the responsibility of the provinces and territories. Prior to the last Ontario Provincial election, the Provincial government announced plans to regulate the sale of cannabis using the Liquor Control Board of Canada (LCBO)for sale and distribution. Mirroring the LCBO model, Ontario Cannabis Stores (OCS) would have been stand-alone retail stores, with locations being selected by the Province. The LCBO had plans to open 150 OCS stores by 2020 and 29 municipalities were selected for stores, however the Township of Selwyn was not one of them. However, on August 13, 2018 the Government of Ontario announced a new plan for the retail sale of recreational cannabis and the Province announced that the government would consult with municipalities, police, industry and other stakeholders to propose new legislation in the Fall of 2018 to allow licensed, private retail cannabis sales by April 1, 2019. It is noted that the Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO) was openly supportive of private retail sales for cannabis as a job creator in communities across the Province to aid local economic development. As of October 17, 2018, recreational cannabis became available through online sales using the OCS as the distributor. On December 13, 2018, the Government of Ontario announced that a temporary cap of 25 Retail Store Authorizations would be imposed while cannabis supply stabilized. As set out in Ontario Regulation 468/18, the Government of Ontario gave the AGCO the mandate to hold a lottery to determine who may apply for Retail Operator Licences. The AGCO established the Expression of Interest Lottery Rules (Lottery Rules) with the specific intent to: • Conduct a lottery that provides a fair and transparent opportunity for potential operators to apply for a licence to operate a cannabis retail store; • Support the government's objective of providing a safe, legal alternative to the illegal market by having licensed operators open cannabis retail stores on April 1, 2019; and, • Regulate licensed retail operators in the public interest. On January 11, 2019, the first lottery draw was held and 25 Cannabis Retail Store Authorizations were granted. It is noted that on July 3, 2019, the Government of Ontario announced that an additional 50 Cannabis Retail Stores would be permitted in Ontario. Draft Considerations for Regulating Cannabis in the Township of Selwyn E I""I 111)1 jk N 9 September 3, 2019 Page 44 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amelrvdm ien Zo... S e I w,�n' Municipal councils were given the ability for a "one time" opt out of licensed sales in their communities after the municipal election with a deadline of January 22, 2019. The opt-out option provided municipalities with more time to consider retail sale in the communities, after which they can opt-in to allow the use. However, once a municipality opted in, it was indicated that there was no option to opt out in the future. In response to the above, the Township of Selwyn launched an online survey from December 17, 2018 to January 9, 2019 to seek public input on permitting cannabis retail stores within their community. Following the survey, the Council of the Township of Selwyn opted in to allow cannabis retail sales within the Township. On April 1, 2019, privatized retail cannabis sales became legal and 10 retail stores opened in Ontario. As of September, 2019, there are 24 authorized Cannabis Stores across open for business across Ontario and 1 application for a new store in the City of Brampton. Below is a table that lists the authorized Cannabis Stores in Ontario. City Name and Location of Legal Cannabis Retail Store (Number of locations in brackets) The Hunny Pot Cannabis Co—202 Queen Street West Ameri—20 Cumberland Street Toronto (5) Nova Cannabis—499 Queen Street West Tokyo Smoke—333 Yonge Street Canna Cabana—435B Yonge Street Ganjika House—186 Main Street South Brampton (2) 360 Cannabis (application submitted)—2933 Queen Street East Burlington (2) RELM Cannabis Co.—4031 Fairview Street Pioneer Cannabis Co— 1200 Brant Street Hamilton (2) Canna Cabana Hamilton— 1317 Barton Street East Hello Cannabis Store—57 Cootes Drive St. Catherines (1) The Niagara Herbalist—33 Lakeshore Road Ajax (1) Smok—20 Kingston Road West Oshawa (1) Tokyo Smoke—575 Laval Drive Central Cannabis—666 Wonderland Road North London (3) J. London—691 Richmond Street Tweed—1025 Wellington Road Fire & Flower York Street Cannabis— 129 York Street Ottawa (3) Hobo Recreational Cannabis Store—391 Bank Street Superette— 1306 Wellington Street Kingston (2) SpiritLeaf—27 Princess Street Brock Street Cannabis—75 Brock Street Niagara Falls (1) Choom Cannabis—7555 Montrose Road Sudbury(2) Canna Cabana Sudbury—2019 Long Lake Road Highlife Cannabis Sudbury— 1299 Marcus Drive On August 20, 2019, the AGCO held its second cannabis retail store lottery draw and 42 applicants were selected to apply for a cannabis retail store. The AGCO website indicates that it is anticipated that Draft Considerations for Regulating Cannabis in the Township of Selwyn E,�u"111^)1j 10 September 3, 2019 Page 45 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amervdm ien Z0... S e I w,�n' stores will begin to open starting in October 2019. In addition to the above, the AGCO website indicates that it has placed the applicants not selected in the lottery on Wait Lists for each Region, based on the order in which they were drawn. Applicants on the Wait List will be moved to the selected list if those ahead of them are found to be ineligible for a licence/authorization or are otherwise disqualified. When the AGCO announced the results of the August 20, 2019 lottery draw, there was a location in the Township of Selwyn on the Wait List. However, this location has since been disqualified under Rule 8c of Lottery Rules, which requires a number of pre-qualification documents and attestation for each Expression of Interest. Given the nature of most, if not all Zoning By-laws in Ontario, the retail sale of cannabis would be considered a retail store and permitted wherever retail stores are permitted. Municipal Zoning By-laws cannot prohibit the cannabis related uses, however the Zoning By-law can be used to regulate the use. As noted in the Township's MCRPS, the definitions within the Township's Official Plan and Zoning By- law are applicable to all retail, including cannabis retail stores. In this regard, retail sale of cannabis from a Provincially licensed store is legal and is a permitted use in the Local Commercial (C2) zone in the Township's current Zoning By-law. 1.4.Role of Municipalityin Licensing It does not appear as if there is any requirement for local municipal support before a Federal licence is issued. In this regard, the Regulation only appears to require an applicant to provide written notice to municipalities and others as per Section 7(1) of the Regulation reproduced below: Before submitting an application to the Minister for a licence for cultivation, a licence for processing or a licence for sale that authorizes the possession of cannabis, the person that intends to submit the application must provide a written notice to the following authorities in the area in which the site referred to in the application is located: a) The local government, b) The local fire authority,and c) The local police force or the Royal Canadian Mounted Police detachment that is responsible for providing policing services to that area. In addition to the above, licence holders are also required to notify the local government when a new licence has been issued as per Section 35(1) of the Regulation as set out below: A holder of a licence for cultivation, a licence for processing or a licence for sale that authorizes the possession of cannabis must, within 30 days after the issuance, amendment, suspension, reinstatement or revocation of the licence, provide a written notice to the local authorities referred to in paragraphs 7(1)(a) to (c) in the area in which the site set out in the licence is located and provide a copy of the notice to the Minister. In the Spring of 2018, the Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM) released the 'Municipal Guide to Cannabis Regulation' ('FCM Guide'). It is noted that the FCM Guide was released prior to the Regulation Draft Considerations for Regulating Cannabis in the Township of Selwyn E,R""I I jk N 11 September 3, 2019 Page 46 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amervdm ien Z0... S e I w,�n' and there was, and continues to be, much discussion about implementation and interpretation. In this regard,the FCM Guide indicates the following: If a business obtains a federal licence under the Cannabis Act, it will not mean that the company will not be subject to provincial/territorial or local government regulations dealing with land use management. Locally, this constitutional arrangement can provide municipalities with the authority to prohibit particular land uses. We recommend that municipalities consult their individual provincial/territorial enabling land use laws for specific direction. But generally, there is no obligation for municipalities to permit cannabis cultivation in specific areas. Notwithstanding the above need to consult 'provincial land use laws', the FCM Guide indicates the following: Local governments are entitled to interpret enabling legislation broadly enough to address emerging issues and respond effectively to community objectives. However, they cannot extend its scope beyond what the wording of the legislation can reasonably bear. Some enabling legislation across Canada may allow local governments to deal with particular uses on a "conditional use" or "direct control" basis, which might be particularly appropriate in the case of new land use activities (such as those associated with cannabis) whose impacts are not well-understood at the outset. It should be noted that 'conditional use' and 'direct control' are not components of Ontario's land use planning regime. In any event,the FCM Guide concludes the following: None of the land use activities that are expected to result from the legalization of cannabis are likely to diverge from the existing enabling legislation and interpretations noted above. The land use activities contemplated relative to the Cannabis Act are similar to activities associated with other consumable commodities such as food, beverages and tobacco. Based on the information provided, and in the absence of other countervailing views on the matter, it is our opinion that a local municipality can regulate cannabis-related land uses that are subject to Federal licences much like any other land use. This means that while there is no municipal role in the licensing process, there would still be a requirement for licence holders to comply with local zoning controls. I.S.Impacts of Federal LegislationiEstablishment of Land Use Controls The Federal regulatory regime does not provide the basis for creating specific land use regulations. For example, there are no setback requirements specified and there are no specific requirements for any type of licence holder to carry out authorized activities away from other land uses. The only specific part of the Regulation that deals with adjacent land uses relates to the production of cannabis for personal medical purposes only. Draft Considerations for Regulating Cannabis in the Township of Selwyn E,R""1111)1j N 12 September 3, 2019 Page 47 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amervdm ien Zo... S e I w,�n' In this regard, it is indicated that any outdoor cultivation (presumably in an individual's backyard) cannot be adjacent to a school, public playground, day-care facility or other public place frequented mainly by individuals less than 18 years of age. In this case, 'adjacent' means, according to Section 306 of the Regulation, if the parcel has at least 1 point in common with the boundary of the other parcel of land with these uses. It is not clear how this will ever be enforced or whether it will be possible to regulate the type of plants grown in a person's backyard through a Zoning By-law. It is also noted that the Federal government also permits anyone to grow up to four plants on their property for personal use. This makes it even more difficult to regulate since everyone will have this as-of-right permission. Notwithstanding the above, local municipalities do have the ability to regulate larger licenced uses and facilities, should they choose to do so. However, any regulation would need to be based on empirical evidence particularly if a minimum setback was required. There are however, a few requirements in the Regulation dealing with security that could be considered through a planning approval process. More specifically, those with cultivation, processing or sale licences are required to design their sites to prevent unauthorized access. This includes physical barriers around the perimeter, an intrusion detection system and 24-hour visual recording. This means fencing or another suitable barrier will be required and the location and design of the fencing may need to be assessed through an approval process to lessen the impact of these barriers on the public realm and adjacent land uses. This also means that gatehouses that control the entry and exit of people accessing a property will be a key element of the use and the location of the gatehouse may also need to be reviewed from a design perspective as well. It should be noted that the use of visual recording devices is also required along with 24-hour monitoring. Given the above, the prospect exists for the establishment of fenced in compounds that may not be compatible with adjacent land uses, such as a business park with generous landscaping around the perimeter. The prospect also exists for fenced in compounds in agricultural and rural areas as well, and this may also not be compatible with the open space character of these areas. The above rules on security generally apply to other licence holders as well (micro-cultivation, micro- processing or a nursery). It should be noted that there are also a number of complex exemptions to the security requirements in the Regulation, which are designed primarily to recognize existing licences or permissions relating to cannabis for medical purposes. The Regulation further states that cannabis must be processed, packaged, labelled, stored, sampled and tested in a building. This requirement could be included in a Zoning By-law; however, the licence would require this in any event. The Regulation also requires that all buildings be equipped with a system that filters air to prevent the Draft Considerations for Regulating Cannabis in the Township of Selwyn E,R""I I ik N 13 September 3, 2019 Page 48 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amelrvdm ien Z0... S e I w,�n' escape of odours. This could also be codified in a Zoning By-law; however, this would again be a requirement of the licence. The Regulation does expressly prohibit the holder of any licence from conducting any activity authorized by the licence in a 'dwelling-house'. This could also be expressly prohibited in the Township's Zoning By-law. Notwithstanding the above, the growing of up to 4 plants in a dwelling for personal use would still be permitted. As a result, a distinction would need to be made between the growing of plants pursuant to a licence and the growing of plants for personal use, if the above prohibition was contemplated. m RegWatory Considerations fir the Township O 2.1.Introduction Over the last 5 years, a number of municipalities in Ontario have passed Zoning By-laws that were designed primarily to control the location of medical marijuana production facilities. A comprehensive overview of a number of the more recent municipal initiatives is attached to this report as Appendix A —Municipal Policy Regulating Cannabis Matrix. In general, many of the municipalities surveyed amended their Zoning By-laws to specifically permit medical marijuana production in certain industrial zones and in some cases, setbacks were established from certain sensitive land uses. Only a few municipalities have amended their Official Plans to include a definition of medical marijuana growing and/or harvesting facilities or medical marijuana for health purposes. While these other municipal examples are instructive, some of them have been updated to take into account the recent Federal Regulation discussed in Part 1 of this report, but many more municipal Zoning By-laws will need to be amended. Given the distinct nature of the land use and its potential impacts, the Township of Selwyn could to make a number of changes to its Zoning By-law to effectively regulate this land use. This is discussed further in Section 3 and 4 in this Report. 2.2.Odour Concerns One impact often considered is the odour from the production and processing of cannabis. A number of municipalities have passed by-laws that established setbacks ranging between 150 metres to 500 metres for these facilities from certain types of uses. 7 1. IIICu''o,uIIl �iii r: Illh°°IIII Illlilll m Ontarbi:) In April 2018, Public Health Ontario released an evidence brief on odours from cannabis production. It Draft Considerations for Regulating Cannabis in the Township of Selwyn E,R""I 111)1 jk N 14 September 3, 2019 Page 49 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amervdm ien Z0... S e I w,�n' concluded the following: • No studies on health effects associated with exposure to cannabis odours were identified in the scientific or grey literature. • Odours can result in annoyance and complaints from nearby residents. Current practices recommend the use of appropriate ventilation and filtration systems at cannabis production/cultivation facilities to mitigate the release of substances that may result in odours. • A system to report and track odours could help inform on timing and extent of the occurrence of odour to assist local authorities to remedy potential problems. The following was also stated in the Public Health Ontario document: The processing of cannabis and production of cannabis products can also result in odour emissions. Activities such as cannabis oil extraction/concentration can involve the use of chemical solvents such as butane or distillation using alcohol which can also contribute to the overall odour emitted from a production facility. Disposal of cannabis waste products is not expected to contribute to odour as proper disposal involves rendering the waste unusable by grinding and combining with other waste products (food, yard, paper, or plastic wastes, or soil) which will mask or dilute odour producing compounds. This waste is then disposed of according to local ordinances, which can include landfills or municipal waste incinerators which themselves are operated under licences that specify engineering controls for odour. The Public Health Ontario document recognized that odour emission controls would be a licensing requirement. On this basis,the following recommendation was made: The upcoming legalization of cannabis in Canada is expected to result in an increase in cannabis production or cultivation in both large and small-scale commercial facilities, and private residences. There is a potential that operation of these facilities will result in the release of odour and odorous compounds into the surrounding environment. However, environmental odours are regularly encountered from agricultural and industrial operations and odour control technologies are both readily available and widely used in these industries. Although regulations and guidelines are still being developed for the province of Ontario, other jurisdictions have already legalized cannabis production and developed best practices and procedures to address odour issues. In general, cannabis production facilities can implement and maintain appropriate ventilation and filtration systems to satisfy applicable local odour nuisance standards. A formal system for residents to document and report nuisance odours can facilitate the enforcement of these standards or municipal bylaws. As part of the permitting process, odour control plans can be reviewed to determine whether emissions are adequately treated such that cannabis odours are not perceptible outside the exterior of the building. On the basis of the above, it would appear as if the establishment of odour controls would be a requirement of any Federal licence. From a local perspective, the Township through a re-zoning or site plan approval process could require an odour management plan to demonstrate that odours will not be noticeable in sensitive areas. However, if odour were a concern, it would be preferable to require a re-zoning to review any odour Draft Considerations for Regulating Cannabis in the Township of Selwyn E,R""I 111)1 ik N 15 September 3, 2019 Page 50 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amervdm ien Z0... S e I w,�n' concerns rather than relying upon the site plan process alone where the use is already established. It is noted that many other types of industries also emit odours (particularly food processing) and there are very few examples of zoning regulations that require setbacks from sensitive land uses. However, cannabis does have a unique and recognizable smell and it could be argued that this is enough to distinguish this type of land use from others. Notwithstanding the above, there have been a number of anecdotal reports of the impacts of the smell emanating from cannabis greenhouses (such as the Redecan facility in the Town of Pelham in June 2018). In this regard, it has been reported that residents have detected odours from the greenhouse from 1 kilometre away. More research will be required on this issue. In terms of the nature of the smell itself, a review of a number of news articles indicates that the odour has a skunk-like smell. It is not clear at this point if the requirements set out in the Regulation and through the granting of individual licences will satisfactorily control odours. On this basis, there may be a need through an appropriate planning approval process to consider this on a case-by-case basis. V i„��i a l I':1111 i„� III i c i s i','.IN CiiD nii s W illiiie r Section 1.2.6.1 of the Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) indicates the following: Major facilities and sensitive land uses should be planned to ensure they are appropriately designed, buffered and/or separated from each other to prevent or mitigate adverse effects from odour, noise and other contaminants, minimize risk to public health and safety, and to ensure the long-term viability of major facilities. The three definitions in Section 1.2.6.1 are below: Major facilities: means facilities which may require separation from sensitive land uses, including but not limited to airports, transportation infrastructure and corridors, rail facilities, marine facilities, sewage treatment facilities, waste management systems, oil and gas pipelines, industries, energy generation facilities and transmission systems, and resource extraction activities. Sensitive land uses: means buildings, amenity areas, or outdoor spaces where routine or normal activities occurring at reasonably expected times would experience one or more adverse effects from contaminant discharges generated by a nearby major facility. Sensitive land uses may be a part of the natural or built environment. Examples may include, but are not limited to:residences, day care centres, and educational and health facilities. Adverse effects: as defined in the Environmental Protection Act, means one or more of: a) Impairment of the quality of the natural environment for any use that can be made of it; b) Injury or damage to property or plant or animal life; c) Harm or material discomfort to any person; Draft Considerations for Regulating Cannabis in the Township of Selwyn E,�u°°�'l 111)1 ik N 16 September 3, 2019 Page 51 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amervdm ien Z0... S e I w,�n' d) An adverse effect on the health of any person; e) Impairment of the safety of any person; f) Rendering any property or plant or animal life unfit for human use; g) Loss of enjoyment of normal use of property,and h) Interference with normal conduct of business. Based on the definitions above, an industrial use would be considered a 'major facility'; with the relevance being that indoor cultivation and processing of cannabis is expected to occur in 'industrial' type buildings. The range of uses that would be considered sensitive as per the definition of'sensitive use' is extensive since any building, amenity area or outdoor space is sensitive if routine or normal activities occurring at reasonably expected times would experience adverse effects. The focus of Section 1.2.6.1 of the PPS is on the adverse effects that may be experienced by a sensitive land use. Based on the definition of 'sensitive' in the PPS, any non-industrial use where people reside or gather, such as residential uses, schools and places or worship and other similar uses would be sensitive uses. The Ministry of Environment (MOE) did come out with guidelines ('the D Series Guidelines') in the early 1990's to assist decision makers when dealing with sensitive uses. These guidelines were designed to inform the preparation of Official Plan policy and the making of Planning Act decisions in cases where a proposed use is potentially incompatible with an existing use. Guideline D-6 (and the supporting guidelines contained within Guideline D-1) is the one guideline that specifically applies in this circumstance since where the intent is to prevent or limit the negative interaction of sensitive and industrial land uses. Specifically, the Guideline is intended to apply when a change of land use is proposed (the range of situations are set out in Section 2.0 (Application) of the Guideline). In Selwyn,this Guideline could apply to cannabis cultivation (indoor) and processing facilities and could provide the basis for the establishment of setbacks on a case-by-case basis between cannabis cultivation (indoor) and processing and a sensitive land use. However, Section 2.3.2 (under Guideline D-1) states the Guidelines do not apply if the land use is in compliance with the existing Official Plan and Zoning By-law. This is an important factor to consider for the Township of Selwyn, since permitting indoor cultivation and processing as-of-right in the Zoning By-law would make it much more difficult to apply the Guideline since the principle of the use has already been established. Lastly, Section 2.4 of Guideline D-1 indicates what adverse effects are in the context of this Guideline. Cannabis cultivation (indoor) and processing would most likely be associated with the adverse effect of 'odours and other air emissions'. Draft Considerations for Regulating Cannabis in the Township of Selwyn E,(u°°�'l 111)1 ik N 17 September 3, 2019 Page 52 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amelrvdm ien Zo... S e I w,�n' Section 3.1 of Guideline D-1 establishes the preferred approach to dealing with adverse effects and indicates that various buffers may be used to prevent or minimize adverse effects. However, the following is clearly indicated: Distance is often the only effective buffer, however, and therefore adequate separation distance, based on a facility's influence area, is the preferred method of mitigating adverse effects. In our opinion, this means that the only effective way of'preventing' adverse effects in accordance with Section 1.2.6.1 of the PPS is separation. The following is then indicated in Section 3.2 of Guideline D-1: The separation distance should be sufficient to permit the functioning of the two incompatible land uses without an adverse effect occurring. Again, this supports the principle that separation is the only effective way to prevent adverse effects in accordance with Section 1.2.6.1 of the PPS. Section 1.1 of Guideline D-6 categorizes industrial facilities into three classes according to the objectionable nature of their emissions, their physical size/scale, production volumes and/or the intensity and scheduling of operations. The Guideline also establishes potential influence areas in Section 4.1. The influence area for a Class 1 facility is 70 metres, for a Class 2 facility it is 300 metres and for a Class 3 facility it is 1,000 metres. Section 2.0 of Guideline D-6 then defines what a Class 1, Class 2, and Class 3 facility is. In order to determine what the classification of the use is (i.e. cannabis cultivation (indoor) and processing) and what the adverse effects may be, experts are typically retained, studies are completed and a reasonable determination is made on the severity of the impact, how it is measured and how it can or cannot be mitigated. While there may be some subjectivity in the analysis, it is generally limited based on the existence of policies, regulations and guidelines to deal with the issue. In the case of cannabis cultivation (indoor) and processing, the main issue is odour, which may be difficult to measure in a rigorous and scientific manner. This is because the odours noticed on any given property will increase and decrease based on time of day, the season, wind-speed and the location of the source of the odour. On this basis, a case-by-case analysis would therefore be preferable to deal with these subjective elements. 2.3.SocialConsiderations There has long been a social stigma attached to the cultivation and consumption of illegal drugs. With the legalization of cannabis, it is legally available in the same manner as alcohol. As a result, there is no basis for an outright prohibition on the location of cannabis cultivation, production and distribution because the uses are now legally permitted across Canada. Draft Considerations for Regulating Cannabis in the Township of Selwyn M E,�u°°�'l 111)1 jk N 18 September 3, 2019 Page 53 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amelrvdm ien Zo... S e I w,�n' However, there may be other economic development or social reasons for not wanting certain types of uses in a community, however, the basis for prohibiting these uses and/or setting them back from other uses would have to be defensible. In addition, similar uses with the same impacts would also have to be dealt with in the same manner for consistency purposes. Notwithstanding the above, it may be desirable to consider establishing unique rules for the siting of cannabis retail stores in the future. Given that the private retail sale of Cannabis is legal and is recognized as a permitted use in the existing C2 zone in the Township's Zoning By-law, the Township may wish to consider regulations that control clustering, restrict the use in areas with sensitive land uses and force stores to locate in standalone buildings. 3. Policy Considerations This section reviews the applicable sections of the PPS, Township Official Plan and Zoning By-law as it relates to cannabis cultivation and processing. 3.1.ProvincialPolicy Below is a review of the policies that apply to rural areas in accordance with the PPS as it relates to permitting cannabis cultivation and processing. It is noted that on July 22, 2019, the proposed changes to the PPS were posted for comments with a deadline of October 21, 2019. However, this section only includes a review of the in-effect PPS. 3 1..1.. Ipii t'iico flII[t uu ra( Z in d IIIIItuu r ) iul'.i�i,a°°we S Cultivation The PPS classifies rural areas into three categories—Settlement Area, Prime Agricultural Area and Rural Lands. The Township of Selwyn has lands that are considered Prime Agricultural Area as well as Rural Lands (those outside of settlement areas and outside of Prime Agricultural Areas). Below are the PPS policies that apply to Prime Agricultural Area and Rural Lands. The PPS recognizes rural areas as important to the economic success of the Province and to quality of life. Section 1.1.4.1 encourages rural areas to be supported by building rural character and amenities, promoting redevelopment, accommodating a range of housing, encouraging the conservation of the housing stock, promoting diversification, providing opportunities for tourism, conserving biodiversity and providing opportunities for economic activities in prime agricultural areas. Section 1.1.4.1 i) specifically addresses prime agricultural areas in the rural area and states: Healthy, integrated and viable rural areas should be supported by: Draft Considerations for Regulating Cannabis in the Township of Selwyn E,�u"111^)1j N 19 September 3, 2019 Page 54 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amervdm ien Z0... S e I w,�n' i. Providing opportunities for economic activities in prime agricultural areas, in accordance with policy 2.3. Section 2.3.3 of the PPS establishes the permitted uses in prime agricultural areas. Section 2.3.3.1 states: In prime agricultural areas, permitted uses and activities are: agricultural uses, agriculture-related uses and on farm diversified uses. Proposed agriculture-related uses and on farm diversified uses shall be compatible with, and shall not hinder, surrounding agricultural operations. Criteria for these uses may be based on guidelines developed by the Province or municipal approaches, as set out in municipal planning documents, which achieve the some objectives. The PPS provides definitions for agricultural use, agriculture-related use and on-farm diversified uses as follows: Agricultural Use: means the growing of crops, including nursery, biomass and horticultural crops, raising of livestock,raising of other animals for food,fur or fibre, including poultry and fish;aquaculture, apiaries; agro forestry; maple syrup production; and associated on farm buildings and structures, including, but not limited to livestock facilities, manure storages, value-retaining facilities and accommodation for full-time farm labour when the size and nature of the operation requires additional employment. Agriculture-Related Uses: means those farm-related commercial and farm-related industrial uses that are directly related to farm operations in the area, support agriculture, benefit from being in close proximity to farm operations, and provide direct products and/or services to farm operations as a primary activity. On-Farm Diversified Uses: means uses that are secondary to the principal agricultural use of the property, and are limited in area. On farm diversified uses include, but are not limited to, home occupations, home industries, agri-tourism uses, and uses that produce value-added agricultural products. The PPS does not make any distinctions between the types of crops that are grown, as long as whatever is produced is harvestable, which means that the cultivation of cannabis would be an agricultural use. All on-farm buildings and structures associated with the growing of a harvestable crop (such as a greenhouse) would also be a permitted use. Section 1.1.5 of the PPS establishes policies that apply to Rural Lands and these include lands outside of Settlement Areas and outside of Prime Agricultural Area. Section 1.1.5.2 sets out the permitted uses for Rural Lands as follows: Draft Considerations for Regulating Cannabis in the Township of Selwyn E,�u"111^)1i 20 September 3, 2019 Page 55 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amelrvdm ien Z0... S e I w,�n' a) the management or use of resources, b) resource-based recreational uses (including recreational dwellings); c) limited residential development, d) home occupations and home industries, e) cemeteries,and f) other rural land uses. Agricultural uses, agriculture-related uses and on-farm diversified uses are not identified in the permitted uses list in Section 1.1.5.2 of the PPS, however Section 1.1.S.7 and 1.1.5.8 indicate that: 1.1.5.7 Opportunities to support a diversified rural economy should be promoted by protecting agricultural and other resource-related uses and directing non-related development to areas where it will minimize constraints on these uses. 1.1.5.8 Agricultural uses, agriculture-related uses, on farm diversified uses and normal farm practices should be promoted and protected in accordance with provincial standards. On the basis of the above, agricultural uses, agriculture-related uses and on-farm diversified uses are also permitted on Rural Lands. Cannabis Processing—An Agriculture-Related Use? Based on existing facilities in other municipalities, the amount of floor area devoted to processing would be significantly smaller than the amount of greenhouse space or outdoor area used for cultivation. In a few cases, the processing component only occupies 10%to 15%of the area. As a result, the processing of cannabis (along with testing and research) could be considered an agriculture-related use. For a use to be considered as agriculture-related, it must be a farm related commercial use and/or a farm related industrial use that satisfies all of the criteria below: • Is directly related to farm operations in the area; • Supports agriculture; • Benefits from being in close proximity to farm operations; and, • Provides direct products and/or services to farm operations as a primary activity. In 2016, the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture Food and Rural Affairs (OMAFRA) published the Guidelines on Permitted Uses in Ontario's Prime Agricultural Areas (OMAFRA Guidelines). The intent of the OMAFRA guidelines is described as follows: The Guidelines on Permitted Uses in Ontario's Prime Agricultural Areas will help municipalities;decision- makers,farmers and others interpret the policies in the Provincial Policy Statement, 2014 (PPS) on the uses that are permitted in prime agricultural areas. It comprises the provincial guidelines referred to in Draft Considerations for Regulating Cannabis in the Township of Selwyn E,�u"111^)1j 21 September 3, 2019 Page 56 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amervdm ien Zo... S e I w,�n' Policy 2.3.3.1 of the PPS. Section 1.1 of the OMAFRA Guidelines also states that: These guidelines are meant to complement, be consistent with and explain the intent of the PPS policies and definitions. Where specific parameters are proposed, they represent best practices rather than specific standards that must be met in every case. Section 2.2 of the OMAFRA Guidelines indicates that agriculture-related uses may be located on farms or on separate agriculture-related commercial or industrial properties. Previously, the PPS 2005 restricted agriculture-related uses to the property it supports or serves. With respect to farm-related commercial uses, Section 2.2.1.1 of the OMAFRA Guidelines specify the following: Farm-related commercial uses may include uses such as retailing of agriculture-related products (e.g. farm supply co-ops, farmers' markets and retailers of value-added products like wine or cider made from produce grown in the area), livestock assembly yards and farm equipment repair shops if they meet all the criteria for the category of agriculture-related use. It is noted that the 'criteria' referenced above is from Table 1 of the OMAFRA Guidelines and are similar to the four parts of the definition of agriculture-related use in the PPS. In addition to the above, the OMAFRA Guidelines provide other examples of agriculture-related uses as well and they are: • Apple storage and distribution centre serving apple farm operations in the area, • Agricultural research centre; • Farmers'market primarily selling products grown in the area; • Winery using grapes grown in the area, • Livestock assembly yard or stock yard serving farm operating in the area; • Processing of produce grown in the area (e.g., cider-making, cherry pitting, canning, quick freezing, packing); • Abattoir processing and selling meat from animals raised in the area; • Grain dryer farm operations in the area, • Flour mill for grain grown in the area; • Farm equipment repair shop; • Auction for produce grown in the area,and, • Farm input supplier(e.g.,feed, seeds,fertilizer(serving farm operations in the area. Based on the examples above, cannabis processing could be considered an agriculture-related use subject to the other criteria being satisfied. Draft Considerations for Regulating Cannabis in the Township of Selwyn E R""1111)1i N 22 September 3, 2019 Page 57 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amervdm ien Zo... S e I w,�n' In this regard, the first criterion to consider is whether the farm-related commercial and/or farm- related industrial use is directly related to farm operations in the area. Section 2.2.1.3 of the OMAFRA Guidelines provide some guidance on what this means: Agriculture-related uses must be directly related to farms in the area, primarily providing products or services that are associated with, required by or that enhance agricultural operations in the area. Directly related to means that the use should reflect the type of agricultural production in the area. Again there are three parts to the above, which means that for a use to be an agriculture-related use in this context and to satisfy this criterion, it must be directly related to farms in the area and primarily provide products or services that are: • Associated with agricultural operations in the area; or • Required by agricultural operations in the area; or • Enhance agricultural operations in the area. It is then further indicated that the agriculture-related use should reflect the type of agricultural production in the area. The PPS and the OMAFRA Guidelines use the words 'in the area'. Given the expectation that cannabis cultivation and cannabis processing would occur on one property, it is not clear how 'in the area'would be interpreted in this case. However, it is noted that a winery is provided as an example and it is possible in some circumstances for all of the grapes to be sourced from the same property. As a consequence, there is no express prohibition in the OMAFRA Guidelines on the processing of cannabis on the same property as the cultivation of cannabis. Notwithstanding the above, the OMAFRA Guidelines do support agriculture-related uses on separate properties in any event. The second criterion to consider is whether the farm related commercial use and/or a farm related industrial use supports agriculture. This criterion does not seem to have any qualification according to the OMAFRA Guidelines and since the processing of cannabis would support the growing of cannabis, it could be argued that it supports agriculture. The third criterion to consider is whether the farm related commercial use and/or a farm related industrial use benefits from being in close proximity to farm operations. Section 2.2.1.6 of the OMAFRA Guidelines state the following: To meet this criterion, agriculture-related uses must benefit from or need to be located near the farm operations they serve. Processing at the cultivation site is a more sustainable practice as going from crop to finished product Draft Considerations for Regulating Cannabis in the Township of Selwyn E,R""I 111)1 jk N 23 September 3, 2019 Page 58 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amervdm ien Z0... S e I w,�n' on the same site limits transportation needs and reduces waste. This practice would also be economically beneficial for the cultivator, who would then sell directly to the dispenser. The fourth criterion to consider is whether the farm related commercial use and/or a farm related industrial use provides direct products and/or services to farm operations as a primary activity. Section 2.2.1.5 of the OMAFRA Guidelines indicate the following: Direct products and/or services refers to uses that serve an agricultural need or create an opportunity for agriculture at any stage of the supply chain (e.g., value-added food and beverage processing and distribution or retail of agricultural commodities grown in the area). Cannabis processing would add value to the product grown on the same site and would therefore satisfy this criterion. Cannabis Processing—an On-Farm Diversified Use? The PPS defines on-farm diversified uses as follows: Means uses that are secondary to the principal agricultural use of the property, and are limited in area. On farm diversified uses include, but are not limited to, home occupations, home industries, ogri- tourism uses, and uses that produce value-added agricultural products. In order for a use to be considered an on-farm diversified use, it would have to be both secondary to the principal use of the property and be limited in area. Section 2.3.1 of the OMAFRA Guidelines indicate that on-farm diversified uses must be located on a farm property that is actively used. In the case of a cannabis processing facility that is located on a property where the cannabis is cultivated, such a use would be on the same property and it would clearly be secondary, because of its limited scale in relation to the cultivated area. This would also apply to the other types of licences, particularly those that deal with testing and research, again provided cannabis was being cultivated on the same property. 3.2.Official The Township of Selwyn falls within the jurisdiction of the County of Peterborough. On October 22, 2008, Official Plan Amendment No. 3 (OPA 3) to the County of Peterborough Official Plan (County OP) received Ministerial consent. This amendment had the effect of recognizing the 4 participating lower- tier municipalities that apply the County OP as their local Official Plan. It is noted that the County is currently undertaking a review of its OP. On the basis of the above, the County OP functions as the local Official Plan for the following lower-tier municipalities: Draft Considerations for Regulating Cannabis in the Township of Selwyn E,�u"111^)1i 24 September 3, 2019 Page 59 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amervdm ien Zo... S e I w,�n' • Township of Selwyn; • Township of Asphodel-Norwood; • Township of Douro-Drummer; and, • Township of North Kawartha. It is noted that there are 4 other lower-tier municipalities within the County that have their own Official Plans and these are the Township of Cavan-Monaghan, Township of Trent Lakes,Township of Havelock- Belmont-Methuen and the Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan. On the basis of the above, below is a review of the County OP policies that should be considered for permitting cannabis related uses. 3 3 1. IIII"°' uir IIII ,i,dl�°i ��i!1 Section 4.3 of the County OP includes policies that apply to the Rural and Cultural Landscape and includes objectives such as, but not limited to: • To permit an amount and type of development in the rural area consistent with maintaining its rural and cultural landscape, • To provide for limited rural development and to ensure that such development does not threaten the quality or quantity of ground and surface water, • To ensure that the agricultural industry remains viable,and, • To encourage compatible economic diversification including greater flexibility for on farm activities, home-based businesses and agri-tourism. Section 4.3.3.2 of the County OP includes Agriculture policies. In this regard, the County OP indicates that: • Local plans, except those of the Townships of Trent Lakes and North Kawartha, will designate on map schedules prime agricultural areas, • Local plans may designate on map schedules other agricultural areas,and, • Local plans will designate on map schedules other rural lands separate from any prime agricultural and other agricultural areas identified. Section 6 of the County OP contains detailed land use policies that intend to guide planning and development in the participating lower-tier municipalities such as the Township of Selwyn. The County OP applies one set of policies for the Rural Component (the Rural Areas) of the participating lower municipalities, while existing secondary plans have been retained for the Urban Component (the Urban Areas). The next page shows Schedule Al: Township of Selwyn Land Use Plan for the Rural Component, where the white colour shows the Rural designation and the tan colour shows the Prime Agricultural designation. Draft Considerations for Regulating Cannabis in the Township of Selwyn E,�u°°�'l 111)1 ik N 25 September 3, 2019 Page 60 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendrnien Zo... S le w,�n' 0 r: nz W PatER of Me �, atlr.M1rd tlalsl"n ••• / Sea lemon s r "•�� rs% tW+, Ei See Semon 7.28 e .• e` See Settbn .•.. :. is 7..28 .4a I ik.'p f• ye ' n a 6� See Semon 6.2.6.4 a),1) Q , a t . See Semen 7.28 01 AA m "A✓ rv' 9 9' '- LEGEND s �� �. Urban Component � x= ❑ GraMh Centre ekei ekl&entlgenodh) N ./ (3`' ` N• Nature Rena; p❑ u" f! ' �a .� ��� ® (curve Lake Rural Component u - ay � � ❑ ANSI P—hdbl Hatch I f ANSI Regional Hatch En,ronmantalconstrarmnrea i r `s` � ❑ \� �I" ❑ Eater.Raadamel �U'"' .-s. + '" ❑'s ® o-emnre Induao-ial a a: ex 41 ❑ .- Hamlet / � � `, '"-�. Illy � ,, y =• 1J Lake field Ur ban Area Hgh,-,ay Commercial / l; 1 ,L See Schedule AL—L ❑ Prime Agrlcunural .., f 5 See 5emon ❑ PmNnciaIN Slgnlllc Wetland Recreation Commercial C " Recreation Open❑ L Space g Sea Saman xo Lakeshore Residential 6 �J III 6.2.2.11 a),III) `"me aurmW♦cr Ir. 3 M/� `�. i See Section ❑ Rural IM Rural industrial )" 6� Brldgenorth Urban Area See Schedule Al-2 RnralSettlement Area Seasonal Resdential J a S.Sactlon ❑ Traller Park �f SEv Semon s, 6.2.12.4 a),n 4 kd� Urban Fringe Area 7.28 a F. a: � k" ® Wean,Management Area %' See Seman 6.2.1.E a),I) G w la SCHEDULE"Al" V. See Semen LAND USE PLAN-RURAL COMPONENT o 6.zz11 a),q c SMITH&ENNISMORE WARDS ' THE CORPORATION OF N THE MUNICIPALITY OF w n aam+a SMITH-ENNISMORE-LAKEFTAT.TI w"ev aaasroe 4� Draft Considerations for Regulating Cannabis in the Township of Selwyn E,R""I E)IjkN 26 September 3, 2019 "I❑r C°�I"" poi„u Page 61 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amelndmen Zo... S e I w,�n' The Rural Component, as shown on Schedule Al to the County OP, includes the following areas: • Prime Agricultural Areas; • Rural and Secondary Agricultural Areas; • Highway Commercial Areas; • Recreational Commercial Areas; • Rural Industrial Areas; • Hamlet Areas; • Rural Settlement Areas; • Lakeshore Residential Areas; • Seasonal Residential Areas; • Estate Residential Areas; • Open Space Areas; • Environmental Constraint Areas; • Provincially Significant Wetland Areas; • Urban Fringe Control Areas; • Waste Management Sites; • Crown Lands. Section 6.2.1.1 of the County OP addresses prime agriculture and provides the following general principle: The Prime Agriculture designation applies to areas where Class 1, 2 and 3 lands under the Canada Land Inventory Soil Capability for Agriculture or specialty crop land predominate. These areas shall be protected for agricultural uses from incompatible, non-agricultural development. Small scale farm related commercial/industrial uses shall be permitted provided that they are directly related to the farm operation and are in close proximity to the farm operation. Section 6.2 of the County OP establishes the permitted uses in the Prime Agriculture designation and indicates that the predominant use of land within this designation shall be agriculture, farm related activities and forestry. This section also includes the following policy that applies to agricultural and agricultural-related uses: Agricultural uses shall include the use of land, buildings and structures for operations conducted on a farm and without limiting the generality of the foregoing, shall include the growing of crops, including nursery and horticultural crops, raising of livestock, raising of other animals for food, fur or fibre, including poultry and fish, oquaculture, apiaries, agro forestry, and maple syrup production. Agricultural-related uses shall include farm related commercial and farm related industrial uses that are small in scale and directly related to the farm operation and required to be located in close proximity to the farm operation such as a grain drying handling and storage facilities. Draft Considerations for Regulating Cannabis in the Township of Selwyn E R""I 111)1 jk N 27 September 3, 2019 Page 62 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amervdm ien Zo... S e I w,�n' It is noted that the above descriptions for agricultural uses and agriculture-related uses are slightly different than the defined terms in the definitions section of the County OP and those that are within the PPS. However, under the current County OP Prime Agriculture designation, cannabis cultivation could be considered as an agricultural use and permitted within the Prime Agriculture designation. In addition, cannabis processing could be considered an agriculture-related use subject to satisfying the 4 criterion established in the PPS, and could be permitted within the Prime Agriculture designation in the County OP. Section 6.2.1.3 b) of the County OP establishes minimum distance separation policies that apply to the Prime Agriculture designation, however these only apply to livestock operations. Section 6.2.1.S of the County OP establishes policies that apply to farm-related commercial and industrial permitted uses and reads as follows: a) A limited amount of farm related commercial and industrial development shall be permitted in the Prime Agriculture designation. b) Permitted farm related commercial and industrial uses shall include such uses that are small in scale and directly related to the farm operation and required to be located in close proximity to the farm operation such as a grain drying, handling and storage facilities. c) A proposed Zoning By-law Amendment to permit a farm-related commercial or industrial use shall comply with the policies in Section 7.9 of this Plan. d) Farm related commercial and industrial uses shall be subject to site plan control. In addition, the Township may require a preliminary plan as part of the application for a Zoning By-law amendment. e) When considered necessary, prior to approving building and site plans, the Township may seek the advice of government agencies or individuals having appropriate specialist knowledge in matters concerning the potential effects of any proposed farm-related commercial or industrial use. The Township may impose building controls in the development or site plan agreement. Issuance of a building permit will depend on submission of a satisfactory site plan. On the basis of the above, subsection b) refers to agriculture-related uses. As noted previously, it is our opinion that cannabis processing could be considered an agriculture-related use. Subsection d) required such uses to also be subject to site plan control, which means that a cannabis processing facility would be required to obtain site plan approval in addition to a building permit. It is noted that Section 6.2.1.8 of the County OP provides special policies for the Township of Selwyn and there is one special policy that applies to a single property that permits an on-farm diversified use. However, it is a site-specific policy and on-farm diversified uses are not included in the permitted uses list of the Prime Agriculture designation and a definition is not included in the County OP. Section 6.2.2 of the County OP includes policies that apply to the Rural designation. In addition to residential development, home occupations and home industries, Section 6.2.2.2 establishes the following permitted uses: The predominant use of land within the Rural designation may include all agricultural uses outlined in Section 6.2.1 of this Plan. Other permitted uses shall include forestry, passive outdoor recreation uses Draft Considerations for Regulating Cannabis in the Township of Selwyn E I""I 111)1 ik N 28 September 3, 2019 Page 63 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amervdm ien Z0... S e I w,�n' and activities connected with the conservation of soil and wildlife. Development by consent will be permitted within the Rural designation, although that development shall be limited and will be subject to the following policies. A very limited amount of small-scale commercial uses, or farm-related commercial/industrial uses will also be permitted. Commercial and industrial uses shall be subject to site plan control, and shall require a site specific amendment to the implementing Zoning By-law, as part of the approval process. Since the permitted uses for the Rural designation are the same as those identified in Section 6.2.1 of the County OP, which applies to the Prime Agriculture designation among some additional uses permitted in the Rural Area, the same conclusion regarding cannabis cultivation and processing applies to lands that are designated Rural in the County OP. Cannabis cultivation and processing, subject to satisfying certain PPS criteria, could be permitted within the Rural designation. Section 6.2.2.6 includes policies that apply to farm-related commercial and industrial uses within the Rural designation and these are different than those that are established for the Prime Agriculture designation. In this regard, Section 6.2.2.6 reads as follows: a) A limited amount of farm related commercial and industrial development shall also be allowed in the Rural designation. Permitted commercial and industrial development shall include uses such as greenhouses, sawmills, fertilizer plants,feed and seed dealers, cattle auction and sales barns, tile- drainage operations, farm equipment sales and services if two-thirds (213) of their operation is related to the processing of agricultural products or the servicing of farms, and that their need to be located in the Rural designation is justified. b) An application for a Zoning By-law amendment to permit a farm-related commercial or industrial use shall comply with the policies in Section 7.9 of this Plan. c) Farm related commercial and industrial uses shall be subject to site plan control. In addition a preliminary plan may be required as part of the application for a Zoning By-law Amendment. d) Prior to approving building and site plans, the Township may seek the advice of the Province, or other government agencies or individuals having appropriate specialist knowledge in matters concerning the potential effects of any proposed farm-related commercial or industrial use. The Township may impose building controls in the development or site plan agreement. Issuance of a building permit will depend on submission of a satisfactory site plan. Subsection a) above provides a more specific list of permitted uses that are considered farm-related commercial and industrial development for the Rural designation than for the Prime Agriculture designation. It is noted that a greenhouse is included in the list of permitted uses for farm-related commercial and industrial development. With the above in mind, in order for the processing of cannabis to be permitted in the Rural designation, it would have to take place within a greenhouse and continue to meet the criteria set out in the PPS in accordance with an agriculture-related use in the PPS. Section 6.2.12 of the County OP establishes the Rural Industrial designation. It is indicated that the use of land within this designation is for dry industries based on private water supply and sewage disposal services. The permitted uses include light manufacturing, assembly, processing, fabrication, warehousing and storage of goods and materials. Draft Considerations for Regulating Cannabis in the Township of Selwyn E I""I 111)1 ik N 29 September 3, 2019 Page 64 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amelrvdm ien Zo... S e I w,�n' Section 6.2.12.3 indicates that the intent of the Rural Industrial designation is to provide for employment opportunities and to provide for variety of lot sizes to allow for flexibility in attracting new industries. There are also a few policies that address potential land use conflicts with surrounding land uses as well to minimize smoke emissions, noise, odours or other forms of pollution. Section 6.2.12.3 f) indicates that Guideline D6: Compatibility Between Industrial Facilities and Sensitive Land Uses from the Ministry of Environment is the minimum acceptable standard when applied to industrial development within this designation. In addition to the above, development within the Rural Industrial designation is also subject to site plan control. On the basis of the above, cannabis processing could be considered as an industrial use and permitted within the Rural Industrial designation, subject to meeting the requirements set out in Section 6.2.12.3 of the County OP and the major facilities policies set out in Section 1.2.6.1 of the PPS. „ IIII 'iIII"'"III Consideration has also been given to allowing cultivation and production in areas of the Township where industrial activities are permitted. As noted previously, a number of other municipalities have specifically chosen to direct cannabis facilities to urban industrial areas (see Appendix A). Given that cultivation and processing can be done in wholly enclosed facilities, consideration could be given to permitting these activities in the areas outlined below, subject to consultation with stakeholders and the broader community. Section 6.3 of the County OP includes Local Plan Policies that apply to the Urban Component. It is indicated in this section that: Where full municipal services exist new development shall be required to connect to the municipal water and sanitary sewerage systems. In other identified growth centres new development will continue to be serviced by private individual water supply and sanitary sewage disposal systems based on the results of the hierarchy of services analysis submitted in support of development applications. In the Township of Selwyn, the Village of Lakefield is serviced with full municipal water supply and wastewater systems. The Village of Lakefield functions as a major growth centre in the County and is anticipated to accommodate investment opportunities both within the County and beyond due to its availability of full municipally serviced lands for development. The Village of Lakefield is designated as the primary growth centre for the Township. In addition to the Village of Lakefield, the Village of Bridgenorth and the Hamlet of Ennismore are also recognized as growth centres, but they do not have piped municipal services. However, they are recognized in the County OP for their importance as service centres to residents and cottagers from the surrounding area. Both the Vilalge of Lakefield and the Village of Bridgenorth have their own Land Use Schedules in the County OP. Schedule Al-1 applies to the Village of Lakefield while Schedule A1-2 applies to the Village of Bridgenorth. The Village of Lakefield contains a number of lands that are designated Industrial and that are generally concentrated in two areas.The Village of Bridgenorth does not include any lands that Draft Considerations for Regulating Cannabis in the Township of Selwyn E,�u"111^)1i 30 September 3, 2019 Page 65 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amervdm ien Z0... S e I w,�n' are designated Industrial. In this regard, the Industrial land use designation and policies as it relates to a cannabis processing facility are being reviewed only in the context of the Village of Lakefield. The next page shows Schedule A1-1: Village of Lakefield Land Use Plan for the Urban Component, where the orange colour shows the Industrial designation. Below is a review of the Industrial designation and applicable policies. Section 6.3.2.5 of the County OP establishes policies for the Industrial land use designation. It is noted that: This Plan designates lands as Industrial where industry presently exists, where the development of industry is considered to be in an appropriate location or where it represents a logical extension of existing industrial development and provides for the orderly growth of the Community. Subsection b) sets out the permitted uses in the Industrial designation and divides the type of permitted uses by light and general industrial uses activities. As described, light industrial uses are industries that are substantially enclosed in buildings and exhibit reasonably high performance standards. In addition, their operations are not considered offensive because of heat, smoke, noise, dust, odours and truck transport facilities usually associated with general industrial. It is further noted that light industrial uses include, but not necessarily be limited to, warehousing, light manufacturing and assembly, laboratory and research facilities, communication facilities, printing and publishing establishments, building supply yards or other similar uses. As mentioned previously in this report, Public Health Ontario released an evidence brief on odours from cannabis production that included a number of conclusions on odour, such as: In general, cannabis production facilities can implement and maintain appropriate ventilation and filtration systems to satisfy applicable local odour nuisance standards. A formal system for residents to document and report nuisance odours can facilitate the enforcement of these standards or municipal bylaws. As part of the permitting process, odour control plans can be reviewed to determine whether emissions are adequately treated such that cannabis odours are not perceptible outside the exterior of the building. It is our understanding that the establishment of odour controls is a requirement of any Federal licence, but it could also be implemented in the Township's Zoning By-law. On the basis of the above, the description of light industrial uses includes warehousing, light manufacturing and assembly and laboratory and research facilities. In addition, a light industrial use is required to be substantially enclosed in a building with reasonably high performance standards. In this regard, cannabis processing could be considered a light industrial use in accordance with the County OP. In addition to the above, General Industrial uses include operations that: may be offensive by virtue of heat, smoke, noise, odour, dust and truck transport requirements and shall Draft Considerations for Regulating Cannabis in the Township of Selwyn E,�u"111^)1j 31 September 3, 2019 Page 66 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendmen Zo... S e I w,�n' W 1 1 ` 1 � � A a A ti & a®IM❑❑❑I®❑®❑El❑❑El awn e9 8 c � t 8 00 N U) n i �i.. J z❑ Et ii%% m �� �i - �i N aI11i f11�1 JIJIJ(11 1 f���'AWN, 1 �'n"t1�U"(li�fI i � �911111IIIVIUI'"� c °v au Ln v a� to tc N • ;i ^ (n t0 U) N � (n N O l0 N C^ C C ; n l0 O cn ff^ O^ M N M ry N�O N fA%6 In l0 (h N nj (n.� %6 M N !n±O W%6 Draft Considerations for Regulating Cannabis in the Township of Selwyn E,R""I E)IjkN 32 September 3, 2019 Page 67 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amervdm ien Z0... S e I w,�n' include large scale operations not enclosed within buildings. Those uses may include, but not necessarily be limited to, the manufacture and processing of primary metal products, wood and paper products, rubber, plastic and adhesive products, chemical products, food processing plants, bulk storage, contractor yards, maintenance yards, vehicle depots, utility functions and public works depots or other similar industrial uses and activities. Cannabis cultivation and/or processing would not be considered a general industrial use in accordance with the description above. While Schedule Al-1 identifies the Industrial land use designation, it does not differentiate between the locations of light industrial versus general industrial uses. This distinction is made in the different zone categories in the Township's Zoning By-law. 3.3.Township Zoning By-law The Township's Zoning By-law 2009-021 applies to all lands within the Township of Selwyn. The Township's current Zoning By-law does not include any standards, provisions or definitions to address cannabis. On this basis, this section provides a review of the Agriculture, Rural and Industrial zones in the Township's current Zoning By-law to determine whether or not cannabis cultivation and/or processing could be considered as permitted uses. aIn d bIi:'Me Section 4.7 of the Townships Zoning By-law establishes the Agriculture (A) zone and it permits a range of residential uses and the following non-residential uses: 4.7.1.2 Non Residential Uses a) agricultural uses, b) conservation or other similar uses as provide for the preservation of the natural environment, c) custom workshop; d) farm greenhouse, e) farm produce retail outlet operated on a temporary and seasonal basis only provided that the majority of such produce offered or kept for sale is the produce of the farm on which retail outlet is located, f) forestry and reforestation; g) kennel, h) nursery farm; i) public use or utility in accordance with provisions of Section 3.39 of this By-law, j) riding or boarding stable, k) small scale commercial and industrial uses provided they directly relate to the agricultural operation; IJ wayside pit in accordance with the provisions of the Aggregate Resources Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.A.S. as Draft Considerations for Regulating Cannabis in the Township of Selwyn E,R""I 111)1 ik N 33 September 3, 2019 Page 68 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amervdm ien Z0... S e I w,�n' amended, the Regulations made thereunder, and, the provisions of Section 3 of this By-law. As discussed earlier in Section 3, it can be argued that cannabis cultivation is an agricultural use. The Township's Zoning By-law defines 'Agricultural Use' as: Agricultural Use: Shall mean a use of land, building or structure for the purpose of animal husbandry, bee-keeping, dairying, fallow, field crops, forestry, fruit farming, horticulture, market gardening, pasturage, poultry-keeping or any other farming use, and includes the growing, raising, packing, treating, storing and sale of produce produced on the premises and other similar uses customarily carried on in the field of general agriculture and which are not noxious. While the definition is not the same as the updated PPS definition for agricultural use, it is similar in the fact that it does not make any distinctions between the types of crops that are grown, as long as whatever is produced is harvestable. This means that cultivation of cannabis could be considered an agricultural use. With this in mind, typically all on-farm buildings and structures associated with the growing of a harvestable crop (such as a greenhouse) could also be a permitted use. Section 4.8 of the Township's Zoning By-law establishes the Rural (RU) zone and it permits a range of residential uses and the following non-residential uses: 4.8.1.2 Non-Residential Uses a) abattoir, b) agricultural produce warehouse, c) agricultural uses, d) auction barn; e) conservation, or other similar uses as provide for the preservation of the natural environment, f) custom workshop, g) farm greenhouse, h) farm implement and equipment sales and service establishment; i) farm produce retail outlet operated on a temporary and seasonal basis only provided that the majority of such produce offered or kept for sale is the produce of the farm on which such retail outlet is located, j) feed and seed dealers, k) feed lot operation; 1) fertilizer plant; m) forestry and reforestation; n) kennel; o) nursery farm; p) riding or boarding stable; q) sawmill; Draft Considerations for Regulating Cannabis in the Township of Selwyn E,�u°°�'l 111)1 ik N 34 September 3, 2019 Page 69 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amervdm ien Z0... S e I w,�n' r) small scale commercial and industrial uses provided they directly relate to the agricultural operation; s) the drainage operations; t) public use or utility in accordance with the provisions of Section 3.39 of this By-law. Similar to the Agriculture zone, the Rural zone permits agricultural uses, farm greenhouse and nursery farm, all of which could include cannabis cultivation as a permitted use. The Agriculture and Rural zones also both permit 'small scale commercial and industrial uses provided they directly relate to the agricultural operation', however the Township's Zoning By-law does not include a definition for this use. There are similarities with the above-mentioned uses and the PPS definition of an agriculture-related use, which restricts the use to directly relate to the farm operation (as opposed to the agricultural operation) and the definition reads as follows: Agriculture-related uses: Means those farm-related commercial and farm-related industrial uses that are directly related to farm operations in the area, support agriculture, benefit from being in close proximity to farm operations, and provide direct products and/or services to farm operations as a primary activity. The PPS definition of agriculture-related uses establishes a list of broader permissions than the 'small scale commercial and industrial uses provided they directly relate to the agricultural operation'use that is permitted in the Agriculture and Rural zones in the Township's Zoning By-law. As mentioned earlier, the processing of cannabis and any related testing and research would most likely be considered an agriculture-related use and/or an on-farm diversified use, as long as cannabis was being cultivated on the same property and the other PPS criterion were met for an agriculture-related use. To provide further clarity in the Township's Zoning By-law on cultivation in the Agriculture and/or Rural zones. The Township's Zoning By-law could be updated to specifically permit cannabis cultivation as a sub-set of an agricultural use. On the basis of the above, an argument could be made that cultivation and processing could be permitted within the Township's current Agriculture or Rural zones. 3 3 3 ur°°ui 3 u st m W3 Zor Iiie As mentioned in Section 3.2.2, the Township's primary urban growth centre is the Village of Lakefield. The employment lands in Lakefield are generally located around the intersection of Concession Street and County Road 33, as well as a property along D'eyncourt Street. However the D'eyncourt Street industrial property is currently the site of Kingdom Timber Mart and is also surrounded by residential uses. The graphic on the next page identifies the employment lands (in orange) within the southeast corner of the Village of Lakefield. The lands are zoned General Industrial (M2), Development (D) as well as Waste Management Industrial (M4). Draft Considerations for Regulating Cannabis in the Township of Selwyn E,�u"111^)1j 35 September 3, 2019 Page 70 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amervdm ien Zo... S e I w,�n' Section 4.1.8 of the Townships Zoning By-laws - ; fir' w r N establishes the General Industrial (M2) zone permits a range of uses as follows: rnnm //�j������a //� A t 4.18.1.1 Residential Uses �� //// ;� �' Q a single detached dwelling provided such "y r g g p dwelling is ancillary to a permitted non- residential use and occupied by the owner, caretaker, watchman or other similar person, as is employed on the lot ~, � 'aiio�O��O�iaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa% on which such dwelling is located. 4.18.1.2 Non-Residential Uses l/ a) abattoir; b) builder's supply outlet, c) bulk storage tank/refilling station; d) business, professional or administrative office provided such use is accessory and incidental to a permitted non-residential use otherwise specified herein; e) cartage or transport depot and yard facilities; f) a Class I Industry as defined by Ministry of the Environment Guideline D-6, being a place of business for a small scale, self-contained plant or building which produces/stores a product which is contained in a package and has low probability of fugitive emissions. Outputs are infrequent, and could be point source or fugitive emissions for any of the following: noise, odour, dust and/or vibration. There are daytime operations only, with infrequent movement of products and/or heavy trucks, g) equipment sales and rental, heavy, h) equipment sales and rental, light, i) general contractor's or tradesman's yard and related shop facilities j) government maintenance depot, k) laboratory or research facility, I) machine shop; m) motor vehicle body shop; n) motor vehicle repair garage, a) outside display and storage of goods and materials where such use is accessory and incidental to a permitted non-residential use otherwise specified hereunder, p) printing/publishing establishment, q) public use or utility in accordance with the provisions of Section 3.39 of this By-low; r) retail commercial establishment where such use is accessory and incidental to a permitted non- residential use otherwise specified here under; s) self storage facility; t) warehouse, Draft Considerations for Regulating Cannabis in the Township of Selwyn E,�u°°�'l 111)1 jk N 36 September 3, 2019 Page 71 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amervdm ien Z0... S e I w,�n' u) wholesale establishment; v) welding shop; w) workshop. Given that secondary residential uses are permitted as-of-right in the current M2 zone, subject to satisfying certain criteria, there is potential for land use conflicts between a sensitive use (e.g. residential uses) and cannabis related uses. If cannabis related uses were permitted and a separation distance was required from the use, there is the potential that a cannabis use could sterilize certain uses on other industrial properties in the area that might require a single detached dwelling as an ancillary use. In addition, it is uncommon for Zoning By-laws to permit residential uses in an industrial zone or within an employment area. If there is a desire by the Township to permit cannabis related uses in the industrial zone, then it is recommended that the Zoning By-law remove single detached dwelling as an ancillary use as a permitted use within the M2 zone. Section 4.17 of the Township's Zoning By-law establishes the Rural Industrial (M1) zone. Below is a list of the permitted uses within this zone. 4.17.1.1Residential Uses a) single detached dwelling provided such dwelling is ancillary to a permitted non-residential use and occupied by the owner, caretaker, watchman or other similar person, as is employed on the lot on which such dwelling is located. 4.17.1.2 Non-Residential Uses a) abattoir, b) agricultural produce warehouse, c) auction barn; d) building supply outlet, e) bulk storage tank/refilling station; f) business, professional or administrative office provided such use is accessory and incidental to a permitted non-residential use otherwise specified herein; g) cartage or transport depot; h) custom workshop; i) equipment sales and rentals, heavy, j) equipment sales and rentals, light, k) farm implement and equipment sales and service establishment, 1) feed mill or seed cleaning plant, m) machine shop; n) manufacturing, processing, assembling or fabrication plant except any such use which, from its nature or the materials used therein, is declared to be an offensive or noxious trade, business or manufacture under the Health Protection and Promotion Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. H.7ond, the Regulations made thereunder; Draft Considerations for Regulating Cannabis in the Township of Selwyn E,R""I I ik N 37 September 3, 2019 Page 72 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amervdm ien Z0... S e I w,�n' o) motor vehicle body shop; p) motor vehicle gasoline bar; q) motor vehicle repair garage; r) motor vehicle service centre; s) outside storage of goods and materials where such use is accessory and incidental to a permitted non-residential use otherwise specified hereunder, t) printing/publishing establishment, u) public use or utility in accordance with the provisions of Section 3.39 of this By-law; v) retail commercial establishment where such use is accessory and incidental to a permitted non- residential use otherwise specified hereunder; w) saw and/or planing mill, x) seed testing laboratory and bank; y) self-storage facility; z) veterinary clinic, aa) warehouse; bb) welding shop; cc) workshop. On the basis of the above, the M1 zone permits manufacturing, processing and assembling as well as warehouse uses. In this regard, cannabis processing could be permitted within the Rural Industrial zone. However, like the M2 zone, the M1 zone also permits a single detached dwelling as an ancillary use. In this regard, the same conclusion applies with respect to the potential for land use conflicts between a cannabis related use and a sensitive use such as a single detached dwelling. 4. r Himi n r Options r the Township -to Consider This Report has provided an overview of the Federal Cannabis Act and Regulation, regulatory considerations related to odour as well as potential social concerns and a policy review of the PPS, the County OP and the Township's Zoning By-law. The main focus of this Report has been on permitting cannabis cultivation and cannabis processing within the Town. In this regard, the policy review identified land use designations from the County OP and zones from the Township's Zoning By-law where such uses may be permitted. On the basis of the above, there are opportunities for the Township to update both the County OP and Township's Zoning By-law to recognize cannabis cultivation and processing uses and provide guidance on where these uses should be located and what factors/criteria need to be considered in the approval process. Below are a number of preliminary options for the Township to consider in regulating cannabis cultivation and processing. Draft Considerations for Regulating Cannabis in the Township of Selwyn E,R""1111)1j N 38 September 3, 2019 Page 73 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amervdm ien Zo... S e I w,�n' 4.1.Updates to the Official The County OP, which functions as the Township Official Plan, does not currently include policies that speak directly to cannabis cultivation or processing. In this regard, a number of updates could be made to the County OP to provide clarity on these uses. Below is a description of the options that could be adopted by the Township. It is noted that the Township could consider all of the options, some of them or retain the status quo. The intent of these options is to identify the types of policies that could be added to the County OP to provide guidance on cannabis cultivation and processing. aIimJ mm4II Desigiin�ation With respect to the Agriculture and Rural land use designations, a new section could be added into the County OP that deals with cannabis cultivation. In this regard, cannabis cultivation could be permitted in the Agriculture and Rural land use designations, but would require an amendment to the Township's Zoning By-law and would be subject to site plan control. The County OP policy could require that Council, prior to the approval of a Zoning By-law amendment, be satisfied that the following has been demonstrated that: • No negative impact will be caused to neighbouring properties or adjacent agriculture uses; • No cause of any traffic hazards or unacceptable congestion on surrounding roads; • The proposed building is complementary to the surrounding areas and that the rural character of the area is maintained; • Any impacts from noise, odour or dust has on adjacent properties has been mitigated; • There will be no negative impact to water quality or quantity; • Adequate parking has been provided; • Stormwater management needs have been met on the site; • Signage is designed and located in accordance with the Township's Sign By-law 2012-092; and/or, • An appropriate setback from adjacent land uses is provided (minimum setback from lot lines could require a certain setback, unless there is another appropriate setback for the site without the requirement of an amendment). Since outdoor cannabis cultivation is considered to be an agricultural use, the County OP could include a policy that requires outdoor cannabis cultivation to be set back a certain distance from adjacent lot lines. The Township could also consider added flexibility for a micro-cultivation licenced operation as this type of operation is generally limited in scale compared to other types of cultivation. The Regulation restricts a micro-cultivation licence to not a maximum area of 200 square metres (approximately 2,100 square feet) in which all cannabis plants, including all the parts of the plants, must be contained. The Township could also consider adding policies into the County OP that deal with the processing of cannabis. In this regard, County OP policy could clarify that the processing of cannabis may be permitted as an agriculture-related use operating in conjunction with a cannabis cultivation operation, Draft Considerations for Regulating Cannabis in the Township of Selwyn M E,�u"111^)1j 39 September 3, 2019 Page 74 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amelrvdm ien Z0... S e I w,�n' but would require an amendment to the Township's Zoning By-law and would be subject to site plan control. Since this option would include policy indicating that cannabis processing may be permitted as an agriculture-related use, then the four criteria as set out in the PPS would also need to be demonstrated. In this regard, County OP policy could require that in order to qualify as an agriculture-use, the following criteria must be met (from the PPS): a) The use is directly related to farm operations in the area; b) Supports agriculture; c) Benefits from being in close proximity to farm operations; and, d) Provides direct products and/or services to farm operations as a primary activity. The County OP policy could also reference the OMAFRA Guidelines. Another option, in addition to the above, is to update the policies in the County OP and the Township's Zoning By-law and not require a Zoning By-law Amendment to permit cannabis related uses. This means that if a cannabis related use satisfied the standards and special provisions for the use, it would be permitted as of right and would not require a public process. 111��� �����:...2 ul 1II'w�j ���Sftm�� III P�II���;�I�q��ll��( k(tm�Z'�:(„� m� In addition to the above, the Township could also consider adding policies into the Official Plan that deal with the cannabis cultivation and processing on lands within the Industrial land use designation in Lakefield, also known as the Township's employment lands. For example, County OP policy could be developed that explicitly permits cannabis cultivation (indoor) and processing within an enclosed building provided the lot is setback a certain distance from a lot with a sensitive use. Sensitive uses could be identified within the policy and could include child care centres, a private or public school, a place of worship or other institutional use, a residential use, a long term care facility, a retirement home or a public park. 1111,,„„;..,.,, Definil�ioil ills On the basis of the above, the County OP could be amended to include definitions for cannabis cultivation and cannabis processing. In this regard,the following terms could be defined: • Indoor Cannabis cultivation; • Outdoor Cannabis cultivation; and, • Cannabis processing. The definitions for the above terms would be based on the Regulation. It is our opinion that there is no need to establish definitions for the various subclasses (micro-cultivation/standard cultivation, nursery, Draft Considerations for Regulating Cannabis in the Township of Selwyn E,�u"111^)1i 40 September 3, 2019 Page 75 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amervdm ien Z0... S e I w,�n' micro-processing, standard processing). 4.2.Updates to the Zoning By-law Below are some options that could be implemented in the Township's Zoning By-law. 1111,7 1.. IIINlCis'':�.4 "for Pefii ifliIlli���iinS It is our opinion that it would be in the public interest at a minimum for the Township to define these new and emerging land uses in its Zoning By-law. This will allow the Township to make decisions on where these uses will be permitted and under what conditions (where they would be permitted is discussed in later sections). The defined terms should mirror the terminology of the Regulation. In this regard, it is recommended that the following terms be defined in the Township's Zoning By-law: • Cannabis cultivation—indoor; • Cannabis cultivation—outdoor; • Cannabis processing; • Cannabis analytical testing; • Cannabis research facility; • Cannabis medical sales establishment; and, • Cannabis drug licence establishment. The definitions for the above terms would be based on the Regulation. It is our opinion that there is no need to establish definitions for the various subclasses (micro-cultivation/standard cultivation, nursery, micro-processing, standard processing). Consideration could also be given to including a definition of air treatment control (ATC), if there is a desire to require that this be an element of certain licenced facilities. Since Municipal By-law Officers cannot enforce federal licencing requirements, establishing an ATC definition and requirement locally would ensure the Township can enforce compliance. 111P1 II iii 1 III„.. ° e'tb iii:k,S fin the LiDCIiIII"t '19111 lftmf The Township could consider introducing setbacks within the Zoning By-law where cannabis cultivation or processing uses are contemplated. It is recognized that a number of municipalities have included larger setbacks in their Zoning By-laws between cannabis production/processing facilities and certain sensitive land uses such as residential and institutional properties. Setbacks could be established for the Agricultural, Rural and Industrial zones to ensure an appropriate distance between cannabis related uses and sensitive land uses. Draft Considerations for Regulating Cannabis in the Township of Selwyn E,�u"111^)1j 41 September 3, 2019 Page 76 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amervdm ien Zo... S e I w,�n' For example, in the Agricultural or Rural zones, the Township could implement a setback for both indoor and outdoor cultivation. It should be noted a definition for sensitive land use would be required in the future, should the Township opt to restrict any activity near them. In addition, and as mentioned previously, the determination of when an odour becomes an adverse effect is very difficult to measure in a rigorous and scientific manner. This is because the odours noticed on any given property will increase and decrease based on time of day, the season, wind-speed and the location of the source of the odour. On this basis, a case-by-case analysis would therefore be preferable to deal with these subjective elements. It is also not clear whether an Environmental Compliance Approval (ECA) pursuant to the Environmental Protection Act would be required for such a use. If an ECA was required, such an ECA could have conditions attached which deal with outdoor odour and potentially air quality issues. 11l1 3 tllD°tKilll!Ill orb iIi9'I ideiIIrati t Its Given that the Regulation indicates that the growing of marijuana is not permitted within a dwelling house, the Township could consider including a prohibition in the Zoning By-law that explicitly prohibits the growing of cannabis that has been authorized by a licence within a dwelling unit. In addition to the above and given the nature of the use, consideration should be given to permitting cannabis processing within standalone buildings only. In other words, such a use should not be permitted in multi-use buildings where there may be land use compatibility concerns, depending on the nature of the other uses in the multi-use building. It is also recommended that the Town consider requiring site plan approval for these types of facilities, no matter their location, should one be proposed. This would require the Township to pass a Site Plan Control By-law. Lastly, while the Regulation appears to expressly prohibit the retail sale of cannabis and cannabis products from a cannabis cultivation use, cannabis processing facility and from the other uses already mentioned, it is recommended that consideration be given to also prohibiting the retail sale of cannabis and cannabis products from these uses as well. Draft Considerations for Regulating Cannabis in the Township of Selwyn E,�u"111^)1i 42 September 3, 2019 Page 77 of 327 f �1,11,1, �Ifrffl I rr � �(J � �/✓i, r„ r it/�, / ti r,/�fr///,rr �J... � � r�,r, ,,,,, / '' ��wf�r./✓�Ir»%/ r .� r , r /i r/ia ri„ � r, i r/i/.lo.. �//,. rr /f'(....r�/ fl rf � ,l� i� � � / / ./i /:,rif r rf r/f 1� ✓ir �.. r/f /�l/ , r1 r � J,./ ,,/i J/ r r ✓ ,i/,,,, �/ r/,r r 1r / l r ,/ �1...�1��,l�. yr(wlf�,/�Jf/.�r�(rr; /,J�w✓f/��r�/,/orp,l/�/�,/�..1/ � i i I �� I ,�fi�/r � d f /l,ll�,��. � r�/��� r✓- �. �I /r ✓Ji l i ,�„ / f�r r, rl f r f/ , ✓ r>� / I r, r 1 /r, r r/ �/11„ s'f���/,J,�;�� � �� 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Greg Bell <gbell@leiproducts.com> Sent: April 7, 2020 1:51 PM To: Cannabis <Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Today's Meeting Hello, My name is Greg Bell and I have lived in Oro-Medonte since the early 90's. I am very concerned about the proposed cannabis grow op that is currently developing the land on the 3rd line of Oro-Medonte. There is conservatively hundreds of millions of dollars in Realestate in the area surrounding this proposed grow op that would be subject to the negative impact of the smell and traffic. This will prevent the owners of these properties to continue to enjoy living in their properties and enjoying the outdoors. This grow op will clearly impact the value of their properties in a very negative way. The Township is potentially exposing itself to be on the receiving end of a large class action law suite if they allow this to go ahead. I would strongly encourage you to consider this in your decision making and make the needs and concerns of your residents in this matter a priority. Thank you Regards, Greg Bell Page 79 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: beverley rodrigues<relandbev@rogers.com> Sent:April 7, 2020 2:52 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: By-law No. 2020-Draft/A By-law to Amend Zoning By-law 97-95 All: We are writing today to voice our opinion on the above By-law and subsequent amendment,for the purposes of your meeting today,Tuesday, April 7,2020. Please include this email as part of the record of today's meeting. It is our understanding that this new draft by-law prohibits any Cannabis Production and Processing Facility or the outdoor growing of Cannabis on land zoned for Agriculture Use or Agriculture Use, Specialized. If this understanding is correct,then we support Planning Department's recommendation and respectfully request Council's unanimous support. As residents of Ward 3, we are "seemingly" being directly and immediately impacted by the decisions being made today,and as such,request ALL council members,irrespective of the ward you represent,to remember: the vote you cast today will most likely directly impact your ward at some point in the future. As residents of Oro-Medonte, we do not wish to see the Township become the Cannabis Production and Processing capital of Ontario. We were disappointed to read recently regarding a medical cannabis operation on Line 7 in Oro Station.As per Our Mayor,the article quotes, "Hughes said the township was given assurances from the operator that there would be no issues with odour,noise or light. Unfortunately,none of those promises were held to 100 per cent,"he said." It is clear that such operations are not good neighbours in agricultural or residential zones; and once up and running, there seems to be very little options for control. Once again,we are in support of the current by-law amendment as presented,provided our understanding as stated above is correct. We are saying NO to such operations being allowed on Agricultural or Residential zoned lands. Council's vote in support of this by-law amendment will be a shining star in the legacy of the council as a whole and of each of its members.This vote is NOT ward-specific and it is not special interest group specific. It is specific to maintaining the beauty and integrity and history of Oro-Medonite. Oro-Medonte:Proud Heritage,Exciting Future Best personal regards, Rel and Bev Rodrigues 16 Basswood Circle Oro-Medonte Page 80 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Mary Crann <marycrann@gmail.com> Sent:April 7, 2020 3:03 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: amendment to zoning bylaw To: Oro-Medonte Council From: Mary and David Crann 17 Red Oak Cres. We strongly urge Council to approve the proposed amendment to the zoning bylaw regarding the growing of cannabis and related production facilities in Oro-Medonte township. We feel that land close to trails,residences, schools, and parks should NOT be available for the growing and/or processing of cannabis. It has been with great dismay that we have seen countless mature trees stripped from perimeter of the property in question, some of which may have been on township land. We would respectively ask Council to pursue by all means available, the land owner(s) of the property in question, should they be found to have violated any township or provincial by- laws/regulations/requirements. Sincerely, Mary and David Crann Page 81 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: G. Pears<pearsgc@gmail.com> Sent:April 7, 2020 1:36 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca>; Planning<Planning@oro-medonte.ca> Subject:ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT 2019-ZBA-01 Greg& Catherine Pears 54 Bay St. Oro Medonte, LOL 21-0 To: Oro Medonte Planning Department,Town Council, & Mayor Hughes First of all, we want thank you for working to address the concerns we have in our community regarding Cannabis production and facilities. We appreciate the effort being made here on this issue and think the Zoning amendment is a huge step in the right direction. There are several compelling reasons to take whatever measures necessary to address the very real concerns for our Township. 1. With regard to water, many other communities were not prepared for what cannabis production entails and some are now facing serious challenges with the quantity and quality of water. During dry seasons, irrigation demands for cannabis farms can exceed the amount of water flowing in a river, leaving little to sustain aquatic life. Seeing the depleted areas, some States have since established environmental regulations for water use for cannabis growers. In California permitted growers are now required to follow strict guidelines that include prohibitions on diverting surface water from April to October and irrigating with stored water during the dry season. These regulations are not imposed on other kinds of crops. The key take away is they've realized they have to address cannabis production and processing differently then other agricultural situations. This is definitely not typical agricultural use. It should be treated differently because it is different. Moving these facilities to industrial zoning, and clarifying it is not agricultural use is truly necessary, and we are happy to see this amendment. We definitely don't want our water supply or quality of drinking water threatened. We want to protect our water and the Lake. 2. With regard to odours, we obviously don't want the skunk smell. Besides the inevitable decline of property values, and just pure misery it would cause,the smell itself is a problem from a Public Health perspective. While our own Public Health department in Ontario hasn't caught on to this yet, researchers in the United States have learned Cannabis emits potent VOC's called terpenes that, when mixed with nitrogen oxide and sunlight,form ozone-degrading aerosols. High concentrations of VOC's Page 82 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... have been linked to a range of human health issues from nausea and fatigue to liver damage and cancer. Some people also have serious allergies to cannabis species plants and odours. Filtration systems only go so far to mitigate air pollution. Basically—if it smells bad -it is bad for you. We don't want this kind of air pollution or threat to public health close to residential or sensitive land use. 3. Cannabis production facilities have significant and unique servicing requirements, particularly around energy, water, and wastewater. FortisBC indicates cannabis production facilities have requested annual energy supplies of up to 22 megawatts for electricity and up to 300,000 gigajoules for natural gas. This level of demand far exceeds typical industrial or agricultural uses and may require substantial upgrades to bring the necessary utilities to properties intending to produce cannabis. 4. Finally there is Public Safety to consider. Moving Cannabis Production to industrial zones make sense to protect the community from the inevitable increase of criminal behaviour related to Cannabis production. Other communities are now dealing with any number of crime related incidents, including armed robberies, white collar crime and non compliance with regulators. Investigative reports have linked many licensed Cannabis companies to organized crime. Let's keep these places as far from sensitive areas as possible. High security fencing is not compatible with adjacent land use and the character of the area with open spaces. Fenced in compounds do not belong in agricultural and rural areas. We've learned some licensed Ontario cannabis companies have publicly declared their intentions to build facilities as large as 1 million square feet where they can produce upwards of 150,000 kilograms of Cannabis a year. Just imagine the size of a place like that. Imagine the demand on our natural resources. Even in the industrial zone,facilities of this size could be problematic. Now imagine living only 150m away from such a facility. We feel the minimum setback needs to be strengthened even further to protect sensitive areas. Let's make it 750m and offer those families nearby a real buffer. Overall,we're pleased with the amendments to the by-law but we are wondering what else can be added to protect our community. Are there ways to ensure environmental compliance? Should environmental studies be required before permits are granted? Can restrictions be stipulated on the sizes of facilities? We also wonder-will companies be able to get around these bylaws by asking for exemptions or variances? If so, how can we prevent that? Some communities include wording like "no variances". Should we? How can the township word this document so exemptions and variances are strongly discouraged? Page 83 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... What wording and policies would help to further mitigate adverse affects of odour, contaminants, health and safety? We do support the changes proposed by-law, but let's also work to further put in place whatever stipulations and regulations needed to protect our township. And let's provide a greater buffer requirement like 750m for Cannabis Processing facilities in the industrial zone so sensitive areas are protected. Again,thank you for your diligence and leadership in this important matter. We really appreciate it. Sincerely, Greg& Catherine Pears 54 Bay St. Oro Medonte Page 84 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Gord Dixon <gordruth@sympatico.ca> Sent:April 7, 2020 12:16 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Bylaw Amendment April 7,2020 To all Council Members As long time residents of Shanty Bay for the last 32 years we have great concerns over what is going in on the property behind us, and how the bylaws will effect what goes in on the property. Under the Townships Official Plan in Section A1 —the Community Vision, it states that "the primary purpose of the Official Plan is to provide the basis for protecting the Township's natural heritage system while managing growth that will support and emphasize the township's unique character, diversity, civil identity,rural lifestyle and cultural heritage features and to do so in a way that has the greatest positive impact on the quality of life in Oro-Medonte." By having any kind of bylaw that would allow for any type of Cannabis grow operation for commercial use in our township should never be allowed any where here especially so close to a community with a school, church, and so many residents living so close. This of course does not even take into effect what an operation of this size will do to our community wells, air quality, traffic, or noise and light pollution from it. We are asking the council to please put a stop to commercial operations like this from coming into our township and disrupting the quality of life that we all have to come and love here in Oro-Medonte Township. Sincerely Gord and Ruth Dixon 3 William St Shanty Bay. gordruthksympatico.ca Page 85 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... April 6th, 2020 ATT Planning Department, Mayor Hughes and Township Council Re: Cannabis Production and Processing Facilities We have reviewed the new proposed Cannabis Draft Zoning By-law Amendment and are in full support of Council supporting this by-law and enforcing it once it is in place. For the following reasons we are in agreement that this industry needs to be controlled and only permitted in certain areas: • This industry has no place by sensitive areas including, homes, churches, parks, schools, daycares etc. • This industry requires high security and extensive fencing which should be located in an industrial area-as this indicative of industry and not farming • The Cannabis industry is too new and the full implications of the industry are not yet known. Therefore limiting to particular zones is a much safer and watchful way of introducing this industry to Oro-Medonte. • The township does not have the available funding to monitor this industry and enforce matters of odour and noise control. • Oro-Medonte is a beautiful township with historic settlement areas often surrounded by agricultural land. This needs to be protected and preserved for future generations. This industry has caused problems in many municipalities throughout Ontario and Canada. This by-law puts controls in place that will help protect residents and ensure that industry doesn't devastate Oro- Medonte communities. Signed By: 61) 01Vt e ! n ��/t ��l C' j�l i/�iQ bYi 7� -✓ {��C �,V r - }ti F Ei +' l i; r i {�S r#i h � rlr 1 -- Page 86 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... April 6th, 2020 ATT Planning Department, Mayor Hughes and Township Council Re: Cannabis Production and Processing Facilities We have reviewed the new proposed Cannabis Draft Zoning By-law Amendment and are in full support of Council supporting this by-law and enforcing it once it is in place. For the following reasons we are in agreement that this industry needs to be controlled and only permitted in certain areas: • This industry has no place by sensitive areas including, homes, churches, parks, schools, daycares etc. • This industry requires high security and extensive fencing which should be located in an industrial area-as this indicative of industry and not farming • The Cannabis industry is too new and the full implications of the industry are not yet known. Therefore limiting to particular zones is a much safer and watchful way of introducing this industry to Oro-Medonte. • The township does not have the available funding to monitor this industry and enforce matters of odour and noise control. • Oro-Medonte is a beautiful township with historic settlement areas often surrounded by agricultural land. This needs to be protected and preserved for future generations. This industry has caused problems in many municipalities throughout Ontario and Canada. This by-law puts controls in place that will help protect residents and ensure that industry doesn't devastate Oro- Medonte communities. Signed By: 61) 01Vt e ! n ��/t ��l C' j�l i/�iQ bYi 7� -✓ {��C �,V r - }ti F Ei +' l i; r i {�S r#i h � rlr 1 " -- Page 87 of 327 a blis Meeting for Proposed Amendmq - o... JoxN .6- alp .k'q;.0 r� Landscape.lrch.itecture, Ut-ban Design, Site Planning April 6, 2020 Oro-I edonf e 148 Line 7 South F Oro-Medonte, Ont inLO t_ 2 Eg i To whom it may concern, As a long time resident of Oro_Medonte 35 years) I arri writing this letter°to express my support of the proposed zoning lay-law 97-95, to permit cannabis production and processing facilities within the Tbwnship of fro- edonte in the following zones; 1. Rural Industrial ( IR ) . Economic Development ment ( E ) Although the Bylaw is comprehensive iti its intent I would ask that the council and staff consider changes to refine the Special Provisions section of the By-law, ri(.,).ahly Provision 1 in item 2, so that the se`Clsi:rck from a sensitive land t.;se is 5 1.nn instead of the proposed _t 0rn, Additiontaily in provision 2 a staterner t should be added that { r'ytinin'ri m distance frown a cannabis facility to a settler'nent bouridary is to be 750m. y reasoning for these enhanced setbacks are that if a developer/ landowner is seeking to create a new IR or Ed Zone through the zoning arcrendrilent process, that they would have to meet the 5 0r'n ant;:`i 750m setback criteria or seep relief through an IR or Ed Exception Zone and .jtastify Why a redt.r ed setback is needed or, appropriate. Tt ,se enhanced provisions would signal the ""l-o wnshi 's concern with C P'seirg proposed nearsettlement boundaries or sensitive land uses i our Township of Oro— Medonte, In conclt.rsiOn, I WOUld like to thank the Mayor, the Council Members and the Planning Staff for providing a thor..rghtful pathway to this difficult and uncharted i s st,r(3 that the; residents ofOro--Medonte and the l"Fovince of Ontario are; presently faced with, "rburs trul w ,.i n E). E, _LL.ire:°.4r, r , ... ,SIL 274 Burton Ave.,Suite 1201,Barrie,Ontario L4N 5W4•Bus:(705)722-6278•Fax:(705)722-5660 Email:jdbellassociates(�irogers.com www.johndbellassociates.ea Page 88 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... Peter and Christine Lang 63 Raikes Street Oro Medonte, Ontario, LOL 21-0 April 6, 2020 Mayor Harry Hughes Township of Oro Medonte 148 Line 7 South Oro Medonte, Ontario LOL 2E0 Re: By-law No. 2020 Draft A By-law to Amend Zoning By-law 97-95, as amended. (Cannabis Production and Processing Facilities Your Worship: We are residents of Oro-Medonte. We live in the village of Shanty Bay. We are writing to express thoughts on the proposed amendment to Zoning By-law 97-95 Cannabis Production and Processing Facilities. If we understand it correctly, the Township is proposing that Cannabis Production and Processing Facilities should not be allowed on Agricultural zoned land but, on land zoned Rural Industrial and/or Economic Development. We assume that this would allow for such processing facilities, as referenced above, to operate along Highway 11 or along Conc. 7, north, which is already home to an airport facility and is an established trucking route. We are aware that there is a Cannabis Production Facility at Oro Station but we are not sure how this land was zoned. That being said, it is difficult to ascertain as to whether the growing of hemp is agricultural in nature. It would appear to be so. We have an example of hemp being grown on agricultural zoned land at Dalston (unless we are mistaken and this land is zoned commercial). At any rate, the property we wish to address in this letter is situated on the 3rd Conc. of Oro- Medonte. This property runs beside the recreational rail trail and backs onto many homes in the village of Shanty Bay. This land is clearly zoned agricultural and as such is not an appropriate place to install a Cannabis Production and Processing Facility. As you are aware, the land is being prepared and there is much speculation as to what the present owner has in mind. It is with much concern that we are writing you to express our opinion that there must be more appropriate land for such an industry in Oro-Medonte than beside a rural and historic community such as Shanty Bay. On another note, if the land is being developed for growing hemp, an agricultural crop, we have concerns regarding the impact this would have on the surrounding water table and run off of fertilizer and pesticides to neighbouring properties and ultimately to the Lake. Again, we are not familiar with what is necessitated in order to grow 250 acres of hemp. Page 89 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... So to summarize: 1) We are in favour of changing the by-law to limit Cannabis production and processing facilities to be located on commercially zoned land not agricultural zoned land; and 2) We are asking that Council put measures in place to ensure that Lake Simcoe and surrounding residential properties will not be negatively impacted by a large agricultural endeavour as is being observed happening on the 311 Conc. of Oro-Medonte beside the recreational rail trail just outside the village of Shanty Bay. Sincerely, Christine and Peter Lang Cc: Cathy Keane, Councillor for Ward 3 Page 90 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: doug galea<doug.galea@gmail.com> Sent:April 7, 2020 10:14 AM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: cannabis meeting,Doug Galea ,6 Red Oak Cres. Nuisance is a legal term used to define a concept developed in feudal England to protect the right of a landowner to use and enjoy his land. Nearly anything that interferes with the comfortable enjoyment of your property can be construed as a legal nuisance. Loud noises, offensive odors, fumes or dust, and even the branches of a neighbor's tree have been ruled to be nuisances. Has the township legal department realized that if they do not plan this properly that they are potentially open to a class-action lawsuit? Page 91 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From:timwtaylor timwtaylor<timwtaylor@sympatico.ca> Sent:April 7, 2020 10:19 AM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: (2019-ZBA-01 Cannabis Production & Processing Facilities) As agreed,please read this at the public meeting. Thank you. Monday, April 61h, 2020 Tim Taylor 20 Pine Lane RR 1 Barrie, ON L4M4Y8 To all concerned, The Township of Oro-Medonte is planning a public meeting (2019-ZBA-01 Cannabis Production &Processing Facilities) on Tuesday, April 7th, 2020. According to the Township, "Due to the evolving public heath situation (COVID-19), effective March 17, 2020 at 8:30 am the Township of Oro-Medonte Administration Office is closed to the general public until further notice. However, members of the community are invited to learn more and provide feedback on the proposed amendments through the input process outlined below." Public input is a valuable, necessary, and mandated component of The Planning Act of Ontario. ("1.1 The purposes of this Act are, (d) to provide for planning processes that are fair by making them open, accessible, timely and efficient; (e) to encourage co-operation and co- ordination among various interests;...) The Township plans to Live-Stream the meeting and the public will be able to submit written comments via email. While this is a perfectly reasonable way of gathering public comments, it does not provide an entirely fair and efficient process of gathering information about this current planning proposal. Until the COVID-19 crisis has resolved itself, it seems appropriate that all municipal planning proposals that involve public input should be postponed until the crisis is over and people have the ability to attend, in person, public meetings, open houses, and information sessions about current and future planning proposals, including this notice of public meeting-(2019-ZBA-01) Cannabis Production & Processing Facilities. Like our esteemed and Honorable Mayor, I have spent a significant part of my life in the education sector. Pedagogical data on learning styles has informed my practice over my 35- year career. Having spent most of my time with special needs students, I've had to differentiate Page 92 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... my teaching strategies to best suit the learning styles of each individual student. This public, live-streamed session is quite limiting to the various ways people procure,process, and assimilate information and, therefore; this planning process may not be fair, accessible, and efficient as suggested under the Planning Act. There are some fundamentally flawed assumptions of this information gathering process. If the Township were authentic about gathering public input, then they would be advised to wait until the community can attend public meetings in person. Not everyone is adept at writing emails. Some people really struggle with the written form of communication. Some people lack the confidence to speak to technical information before them. Many of these ideas are filled with specific jargon that might be challenging to navigate. What about people who have learning disabilities and cannot process information in this fashion? Others need much more time to process complex thoughts. People may suffer with Irlen's Syndrome, also referred to at times as Meares-Irlen Syndrome, Scotopic Sensitivity Syndrome, or Visual Stress. Other disorders such as ADD, ADHD, and Dyslexia limit one's ability to concentrate due to slow or inefficient reading ability, eye strain, and an inability to sit still for periods of time. What about people who cannot read or write? How would they participate in such a key event? This process is far from open, accessible, and efficient. Many people process information visually. They need to see within a three-dimension space. Still others need to sit and listen while they gather information. This is not uncommon for most learners. Some people are very social and depend on social interaction and the physical space to gain important information, while others are logical thinkers and need to experience the entire public and tactile background before they become comfortable with new information, especially information that will directly or indirectly impact their personal living situation. There is another important bias in this process. This public format implies that all interested persons are adept at using computer technology to communicate ideas easily and seamlessly. Many residents in Oro-Medonte may not even have computer equipment, tablets, or smartphones and this would preclude them from participating in this fashion. This speaks directly to the ideas of fairness and openness. This process also assumes that people have adequate band width to live stream. Since we live in a rural setting, many people have poorer connectivity compared to people who live in Barrie or Orillia for instance. Given that most people are practicing "social isolation" at home, band width is at a premium these days, especially in areas with low speed streams. Streaming is challenging at the best of times throughout this township, so residents may not be able to participate in real time. One of the main advantages of public meetings is the ability for stakeholders to listen to and to talk to each other. This means that various participants really should be together. A one-way email transmission of comments or concerns is just that—one way. The only way to facilitate meaningful dialogue is in a public setting, so I implore all concerned to postpone this activity until a time when everyone who chooses to be engaged in this process can congregate at the Township office. Page 93 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... It appears that there are several good reasons why this session on April 71h, 2020 ought to be put off until another day. While the Planning Department is being dutiful in fulfilling their individual mandates, a key component of this process is being restricted under the rubric of The Planning Acta fulsome public interaction and public debate. To ensure that residents' rights are being protected, it is important that you allow rate-payers of Oro-Medonte a more open forum during this municipal decision-making process. This also applies to other planning proposals that may arise during this COVID-19 emergency as well. Thank you for your attention of this very important matter. Tim Taylor 20 Pine Lane, RR1 Barrie, ON. L4M 4Y8 Page 94 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Matt Pryce<mp@prycon.com> Sent:April 7, 2020 9:56 AM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Cannabis Production and Processing Facilities. To the Mayor and Councillors of the Township of Oro-Medonte. This letter is written to compliment the leadership that The Township of Oro Medonte and Staff have exercised to address the permitted use of lands for the purpose of"Cannabis Production and Processing Facilities". We are in full support of the amended bylaw as presented to Amend Zoning By-law 97-95. The growth and production of Cannabis and any plant that belongs to genus Cannabis should be restricted to Rural Industrial (IR) and Economic Development (ED) lands. We urge the leadership of the Township of Oro-Medonte to vote to approve this by-law. Matt and Shari Pryce 1685 Ridge Rd W Oro-Medonte,On Matt Pryce t CKKIsrtANIaN BuildingRumm mio Iom 705.739.0023 www.p[ycon.com mpCa)_prycon.com Page 95 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Maxim, Randall <randall.maxim@hubinternational.com> Sent:April 7, 2020 10:02 AM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Public Meeting(Notice)for the purpose of obtaining additional comments on a proposed amendment to the Township's Comprehensive Zoning By-law 97-95,to permit cannabis production and processing facilities within the Township of Oro-Medonte Importance: High Good Morning: As residents of Oro-Medonte and located within close proximity(.5 km)to a proposed development of a cannabis production facility, we want to make our position very clear. We do not support the amending of by-laws to allow such a facility to establish themselves and operate in this area. We object to any such facility or operation that is involved in the production or processing of this type, in such close proximity to our homes. The site that runs alongside the walking trail above Ridge Road and stretches from Line 2S—Line 3S, is in an area of private homes,with an elementary and nursery school in the immediate vicinity, and Lake Simcoe in close proximity,this operation does not belong here! This facility will have long term negative effects on quality of life, community health and well-being, as well as residential values. While we object to any Cannabis facility being allowed in Oro-Medonte,the Township has an area zoned for industrial use which would be a better place for cannabis production and growing(indoor or outdoor)facilities and not immediately next to residential communities such as Shanty Bay or any other Oro-Medonte residential area. We must have strong by-laws protecting our communities. Questions/Comments: 1 -Adding the following sentence at the end of the definition of"Agricultural Use": "An Agricultural Use does not include a Cannabis Production and Processing Facility or the outdoor growing of Cannabis." Does this mean you will allow indoor growing of cannabis on Agricultural zoned areas? Indoor growing of cannabis also presents many problems, including Traffic and noise, Noxious smell, significant water use and physical safety. The bylaw should be amended to also exclude indoor growing of cannabis in Agricultural Zones. 2—Rezoning of Agricultural Zoned lands should not be approved without extensive research regarding the use and significant input from the Community at large in advance of the proposed changes. We ask to be heard, and for your support with respect to this community sensitive issue. Sincerely, Randall Maxim & Patricia Hanmer 1400 Ridge Road W., Oro-Medonte, ON LOL 21-0 Page 96 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: peter_leszczynski<peter_leszczynski@bell.net> Sent:April 7, 2020 11:12 AM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Shanty bay I am in support of a new bylaw that prohibits land development for the purpose of a cannabis farm on 200 acres of land near the village of shanty bay. Sincerely Peter Leszczynski 33 mapleridge road Oro medonte 705-734-6328 Page 97 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Rudi <rudiabertl@rogers.com> Sent:April 7, 2020 11:04 AM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: concerned To whom it may concern. My name is Rudolf Abert, I live in Shanty-Bay, at 1 Annwood - Copse. I am writing to you as a concerned citizen in regards to recent developments between Line 2 and Line 3. It seems to me, and all citizens of Shanty- Bay, and surrounding neighborhoods that a travesty is in the making, namely the possibility of a Marijuana facility (operation). I strongly object to this undertaking,since it will negatively affect all aspects of life in Shanty- bay. Houses are very close by, so is the school, the drilling of wells, on said property indicates a high volume of water consumption will be needed , as well as digging a huge pool (pools) is further proof that this Marijuana growing operation is ill suited for the site proposed. 1 plant needs 23 liters of water a day, you do the math, there could be a water shortage for adjacent house holds, worst case scenario for all property owners in and around Shanty Bay. In conclusion, since the property in question is zoned farmland, and not industrial, this operation between line 2 and 3 should be scrapped immediately, and if necessary located on property zoned INDUSTRIAL. It is time for the Mayor and its council to make a stand for its citizen in Shanty Bay, and Oro Medonte as a whole. Regards, Rudolf Abert, 705 7216806 Page 98 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Eileen Anderson <rickanderson313@sympatico.ca> Sent: April 6, 2020 1:46 PM To: Cannabis <Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Cannabis growth and facility line 2-3 We live and have lived in the Village of Shanty Bay for 45 years. We chose to make this our home because of the unique and rural atmosphere that we wanted to raise our family in. We do not want to see that change! We fully agree that there should be NO cannabis, hemp farm or processing facility on the above property so close to the residential village of Shanty Bay. It is a shame what the owners have done to the trees on said property, as well as to the farmland. They should be responsible in returning it to the original condition. We would like to see NO such facilities at all within our township of Oro Medonte, however if it should occur, we feel strongly that the appropriate location would be on Industrial zones or economic development zones. I would like to think that each and every one of our representatives on council would not like to have this happening in your back yards. I hope our council and staff will do the right thing, and not allow this to happen in our neighbourhood. Thank you, Eileen and Rick Anderson 3 Brook Street Oro-Medonte, Ontario Page 99 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Bonnie Yeates<beginfreshtomorrow@gmail.com> Sent:April 6, 2020 11:00 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Fwd: Cannabis Faculties by law anf regulations Subject: Cannabis Faculties by law anf regulations As a resident of Oro Township I am totally against any cannabis facility. We need to protect our agricultural land our school's our residential areas. The current place did not meet the agreed upon regulations therefore I believe in order for them to continue they should meet those obligations. Instead of polluting our land ,fariners lively hoods and food sources Including our water sources are water. Don't make this mistake again don't let them take away all that we have built from generation to generation in our Township our Homes Thank you Bonnie Jean sheldrake 2309 penetanguishene rd R.R 1 Barrie Ontario Page 100 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From:fareba assadian <farebagfa@yahoo.ca> Sent:April 6, 2020 1:55 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject:Zoning By-law Amendment 2019-ZBA-01 Cannabis Production and Processing Facilities To Mayor Hughes, Town Council and Oro Medonte Planning Department, I am a resident of Oro-Medonte and strongly feel that Cannabis Production and Processing Facilities should NOT be on agricultural lands in Oro-Medonte. They should be restricted to rural industrial and economic development lands where neighbourhoods and communities are not impacted. Allowing this to happen on agricultural lands would be irresponsible and could have dire effects on our water supply, air quality and overall health. Crops grown on agricultural land, such as corn, do not require fencing and security and jeopardize our water supply. Cannabis is a different crop which requires a different set of rules and on dedicated lands in appropriate zones. It is encouraging to see Council making decisions that reflect the well being and health of its residents. support the amended cannabis by-law. Name:Zahra Assadian Biouckzadeh Address:1753 Ridge Rd W Oro-Medonte On L-01-21-0 Page 101 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Bonnie Yeates<beginfreshtomorrow@gmail.com> Sent:April 6, 2020 10:07 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Cannabis Faculties by law anf regulations As a resident of Oro Township I am totally against any cannabis facility. We need to protect our agricultural land our school's our residential areas. The current place did not meet the agreed upon regulations therefore I believe in order for them to continue they should meet those obligations. Instead of polluting our land ,farmers lively hoods and food sources Including our water sources are water. Don't make this mistake again don't let them take away all that we have built from generation to generation in our Township our Homes Thank you Bonnie Jean sheldrake Page 102 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Cheryl Paul <cheryllynnpaul@gmail.com> Sent: April 6, 2020 3:13 PM To: Cannabis <Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: By-law Dear Oro-Medonte Planning Department, Town Council and Mayor Hughes, My name is Cheryl Paul and I have lived in Oro-Medonte for 3 years with my husband and 2 children that attend Shanty Bay Public School. I oppose the development happening between line 2-3 and support the amended by-law that keeps cannabis and hemp production and development in industrial zones. I have concerns about the amount of water consumption, residents' quality of life with the odour, noise, and lighting. This development should not be near any residential area. Cheryl Paul 9 Basswood Circle Oro-Medonte ON LOL 21-0 Page 103 of 327 3.a\ 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment fnthe Zn... Nicole& Ryan Foubert 111971 Une 2 S [}no Medon1e, GN L0L2L0 705 795 2595 mic0Ue.f0u�bert((�)y�h80.C8 5th April 2O2O Township of Oro-Medonte Township Administration D0ioe 148 Line 7S Oro-K8edonte, ON LUL2LO cannabis(-d)mro-medonte.ce To the Council ofOro-Medonte. We have reviewed the proposed amendments to the zoning by-law 95-97,to permit cannabis production and processing facilities within the Township of Oro-Meclonte and have many concerns that are not adequately addressed in the draft by-law as follows: 1. While waste management is a major consideration, the water required does not seem to be. As we are a rural municipality well water would be the sVurce, and would tap into aquifers upon which we all depend. Approval of the Ministry of Natural Resources, among other agencies ought to be a requirement, and disclosure of the water requirement to the municipality ought to be a priority consideration. We are a family with young children who are extremely concerned with the proximity of such a facility and the ability of our drinking water to become contaminated. 2. When considering the establishment of new residential developments, one of the major concerns is the natural conflict between agricultural uses and residential uses. There has historically been a separation of Residential, Agricultural and Industrial uses to ensure compatibility of use. This by-law as proposed introduces an industrial use into an agricultural use as of right, with very little separation from residential uses. Town should be turning to the Ontario Ministry ofAgricultural, Food and Rural Affairs, and if necessary, the federal Department of Agriculture to see what other communities are doing. 3. With the processing as proposed, there will be necessarily greatly increased truck traffic. The b\+|ovv does not require a traffic s1udy, nor its impact and compatibility with neighbouring land uses. 4. We understand from conversations with the residents near the Oro Station plant,that in addition to smell and light pollution,there is considerable noise from the generators utilized there. Noise is a consideration in the development of residential and industrial uses, and should be a major concern when approving new Cannabis operations, and the character of the surrounding existing uses should play major role in deliberations of allowing such developments. Page 104Of327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... 5. A major concern is the loss of viable farmland which will result. Food producing areas of the planet are disappearing for many reasons. Oro-Medonte has only a precious few areas that are of the higher classes of farmland. I am aware that solar installations are restricted in the class of farmland on which they may be situated. A limitation in this regard would be a definite positive addition to the by-law, as well as a mandatory consultation with the Ministry of Agriculture and the local health unit. 6. Shanty Bay Public School was selected by the Simcoe County School Board as a priority to be re-built and if there is a cannabis/hemp facility across the street,the school board will never agree to rebuilding our historical school that is such an important piece of the village. Our community will no doubt lose its livelihood and appeal to both home-owners and business owners. 7. The minimum 150m setback from Sensitive Land Uses is not sufficient whatsoever. In many areas in our Township, properties in question for cannabis facilities and production are adjacent to these Sensitive land uses and will be negatively impacted in irreversible ways. We are also extremely concerned regarding the language of the land uses that are permitted for cannabis related activities and what measures, if any,will be put in place by the Township to ensure that property owners who wish to operate a cannabis facility but have inadequate zoning will just apply to be rezoned. We appreciate that a public meeting was held, however for whatever reason the attendance was poor, and we can only assume that the modes of notice were insufficient to draw this very important issue to the residents of Oro-Medonte, as we live on the 2nd Line S and were never notified. We understand that the interim by-law will expire on June 4, 2020 and with the global pandemic of Covid-19, do not understand why the Township is not taking more drastic measures for specific properties in question that are continuing to operate a work site and ignoring the social distancing and essential service parameters set forth by the Federal and Provincial governments. Cannabis production is not an essential service at this time,there is an abundance of cannabis through OCS and they have even closed down physical stores because of the pandemic. So why the Township of Oro-Medonte is even considering allowing cannabis production within its boundaries is absurd. We strongly suggest the prudent course of action would be to pass a final by-law prohibiting the growth and processing of both hemp and cannabis until a proper study and consultation process is completed. There is absolutely no need for our council to allow such imprudent action which would have potentially devastating consequences for the residents of the Township whom you have been elected, and swore an oath of office to serve. Thank you for considering our concerns, Sincerely, Nico%fr Ryau FoabeNt Page 105 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: COTTON <craigandbecca@rogers.com> Sent: April 6, 2020 9:48 PM To: Cannabis <Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Cannabis Bylaw Input Good evening, Myself and my husband are in favour of the proposed amendment to the zoning bylaws regarding cannabis. We would support the councillors and council voting yes to the amendments to the townships zoning bylaws. We do not support a cannabis grow operation and/or processing plant in Shanty Bay. We are: Craig and Rebecca Cotton 6 Gowan Rd Oro Medonte LOL 21-0 Page 106 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Paul, Darryl <Darryl.Paul @ca.gt.com> Sent:April 6, 2020 3:33 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca>; Planning<Planning@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Cannabis Draft By-law Dear Oro-Medonte Planning Department: My name is Darryl Paul and I have lived in Shanty Bay, Oro—Medonte with my family for 3.5 years. I am writing to address the development that currently seems to be happening between lines 2 and 3 in Shanty Bay and the proposed new By-Law Amendment that would be required to prevent such development. One of the main reasons we chose to reside in Shanty Bay is because of the rural residential mixed with agricultural land and the appeal that setting holds as a place to raise a family. I am shocked and disappointed at the development that is presently occurring and that I have come to learn is being contemplated for the site. I understand that municipalities must constantly shifty their thinking and reevaluate how they use land, but this site is not appropriate for this development. Please do not let this proceed. I wish to thank you for your efforts in making the required amendments to the cannabis by-law to ensure it would prohibit Cannabis, including Hemp, in all agriculture zones in Oro-Medonte. A crop that requires high fencing, security, excessive water consumption and disturbs residents' quality of life with a pervasive odour, excessive noise, and artificial lighting, does not belong on lands that are close to residential settings. It belongs in industrial land tracks and zoning. I support the amended cannabis by-law. Sincerely, Darryl Paul 9 Basswood Circle Oro-Medonte, ON LOL 2L0 705-252-0109 Page 107 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... March 28, 2020 Dear Oro-Medonte Planning Department, Town Council, and Mayor Hughes, My name is James Hill and I have lived in Oro—Medonte for 22 years. We have enjoyed living within this very well preserved community throughout this time. As a resident of Shanty Bay, we are located immediately behind the Trans Canada rail trail that runs between Barrie and Orillia. This recreational trail is used and enjoyed by many folks during all four seasons of the year. We feel that the development of a Cannabis Production Facility immediately beside this trail will ultimately ruin this beautiful part of our community. A crop that requires high fencing, security, excessive water consumption and disturbs residents' quality of life with a pervasive odour, excessive noise, and artificial lighting, does not belong on lands that are close to residential/recreational settings. It belongs in an industrial land. Many thanks for your efforts in making the required amendments to the cannabis by- law to ensure it would prohibit Cannabis, including Hemp, in all agriculture zones in Oro-Medonte. We cannot express enough gratitude towards all parties involved in helping to ensure that our community and the surrounding land are preserved. Sincerely, Jim Hill Page 108 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Farida Jones<farida.jones@rogers.com> Sent:April 6, 2020 4:11 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: public meeting. Dear Mayor Hughes, Council members and Planning staff I am writing to you in support of the amended draft by-law restricting Cannabis production and processing to Industrial lands only. However, I am extremely concerned that the by-law may not be strong enough to withstand an appeal. I have read through the PPS and while it discusses agricultural crops, it was not created at a time when legal cannabis growing operations were part of the landscape. The authors could not have imagined the negative impacts to agricultural lands segregated by 8 ft security fences with barbed wire, security lighting, cameras, strong continuous skunk odours, chemical processing, wildlife blocked from their natural pathways and habitats, farm trees removed, vast irrigation reservoirs and impacts on drinking water, health and property values of neighbouring property owners. Please do your research and close any loop holes a Cannabis producer can squirm through. If this by-law is challenged down the road, I hope the township will vigorously defend its position and I will in turn do my part to support the Township in this matter. Thank-you Fa4-i d a JOI'U&y 3_1 G 7 2- 0 ro--M e of o- LO L 2.LO 705-73 7-420 8 Page 109 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: george.shufelt george.shufelt<george.shufelt@sympatico.ca> Sent:April 6, 2020 1:54 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: By-Law 97-95 Please accept this as our support to the proposed amendment whereby prohibiting the growing and/or processing of cannabis on Agricultural or Specialized Agricultural Zoned Lands in the Township of Oro-Medonte . We have lived in Shanty Bay and have been active participants of the area for 42 years. As frequent users of the Rail Trail between the 2nd and 3rd lines of Oro-Medonte it is difficult to comprehend that such a massive area of Agricultural Land is currently being developed with the possibility of construction of a cannabis facility. This becomes even more incomprehensible when considering the close proximity to the Shanty Bay school, park, and the multi use rail trail which actually abuts the aforementioned Lands. Again we wish to reiterate we strongly support the proposed amendment to By-Law 97-95. Thank you . George & Carol Shufelt 9 Melissa Cres Shanty Bay Page 110 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Ian Malcolm <ian@ismarchitects.ca> Sent:April 6, 2020 3:46 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Cannabis production and process location Dear Council members, Good work on formulating a bylaw to deal with this issue. My only suggestion to the wording would be in 3(a) " Sensitive land as" ...in the first line..." existing residential buildingS"...make residential buildings plural. Signed, Ian and Sinikka Malcolm 33 Barrie Terrace Page 111 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Denstedt Jason <Jason.Denstedt@kohler.com> Sent:April 6, 2020 1:52 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Cannabis Processing Facility Dear Oro Medonte Planning Department,Town Council and Mayor Hughes, My name is Jason Denstedt and I live at 5 Basswood Circle, in Shanty Bay(Oro Medonte) and my phone number I s416-301-1690. I have been a resident in Shanty bay for the past 8 years and feel it was one of the best moves of our families lives. The sense of community is second to none. I wanted to thank you for your efforts in making eh required amendments to the cannabis by-laws that will ensure that we are prohibiting cannabis (including hemp)to be manufactured in our agricultural zones,within Oro Medonte. A crop that requires high perimeter fencing, security, excessive water consumption and disturbs residents quality of life,with pervasive odour, excessive noise and high levels of artificial light, does not belong on lands that are so close to residential settings. This belongs on industrial zoned property. Thanks you for your leadership...I support the amended cannabis by-law. Best, Jason Denstedt Page 112 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: katherine@kngtechnical.com <katherine@kngtechnical.com> Sent:April 6, 2020 2:40 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Cannabis meeting My name is Katherine Gausby and I live at 475 Line 2 South, Oro-Medonte LOL2LO. I am sending this email as a complaint and I object to the rezoning of this area. This is a family friendly area with a school, parks and rail trail. 1. The traffic that would be brought upon us would increase. 2. Noise pollution would increase. 3. The stench of skunk like smell will prevent us from opening our windows and doors. Kids playing outside. 4. Involuntary exposure to concentrated chemicals emitted by the cannabis operation that can trigger headaches, asthma episodes and other respiratory problems. Children and other people with weakened immune systems will greatly suffer. 5. Drawing from our local water tables that can effect surrounding wells 6. Physical Safety and security concerns. Armed guards in our neighborhood? 7. Property Value? Kindly take our wonderful village into your decision. Sincerely, Katherine Gausby Sales Support Specialist 888-898-0367I ,k lh iril e@ Ikingteclhrnical._co KNG Technical Inc. is a member-owner of.I.NPAP I[I.he W.Qrld .d_e_II3. cLauit.In.g INet o_�rlk, your premier independent recruiting firms located throughout Europe,Asia, Australia,Africa and the Americas. Page 113 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Lee Anne Sergeant<leeanne.sergeant@gmail.com> Sent:April 6, 2020 4:21 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Cannabis production facility Line 2/3 -support for bylaw amendment Hello! I am writing to express my concerns for the cannabis production facility going in on Line 2/3, and express my support for the bylaw amendment. I would like to see the bylaw recommendation of 150m extended further, to 500m or more from residential or recreational property lines, as 150 meters in Oro is hardly anything (and there is plenty of farmland in this region that is no where close to residential areas). If this can happen in Shanty Bay RIGHT next to residential area this can happen anywhere within Oro. I would hope that with the vote at city council, the Council members would be voting as if this was happening in their backyard, right down the road from their own residence, and not assuming that just because they live outside of Line 2/3 it isn't a concern for them. My main concerns are: -Noise (there is a cannabis facility in Horseshoe Valley and noise has been a considerable concerns for residence, affecting their ability to enjoy the outdoors). There are generators that need to run 24/7 in some cases and the result is a lot of noise. Part of the reason we moved here was for the peace and quiet. - Smell. To my understanding these facilities need to have an air filtration system in place to avoid the smell, but my concern would be if they would live up to these standards and care enough to abide by them. It is too easy for companies to wait until they are taken to court to abide by this. - Light pollution. - Property Value: will there be a decrease given the proximity of the cannabis property to many of the homes in Shanty Bay? -Aesthetics: the look of the chain linked barb wire fence that is to surround the property is concerning as this will be along the rail trail as well. - My concern for possible well contamination for other drinking water in Shanty Bay. - Furthermore, there should be further bylaws on the proximity to local schools for this type of land. These individuals putting up this facility seemingly have no regard for the township, no regard for working WITH neighbors (despite their website saying they abide by 'good neighour' standing from what I have seen by driving by this property and following the information), unless I have missed something. Page 114 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... I have nothing against Cannabis production,but when a company or facility is not transparent to the township, and chooses land on the edge of a residential area as well as along the rail trail that is used by many locals, rips out trees all over the place (did they need a permit for this?) I cannot support this. There is far more suitable land to use in this case, and it is not here. We should have the choice to select the companies we want to see use the Oro lands for this purpose. Best, A concerned resident (Lee Anne Sergeant-please don't use my name for reading aloud, thanks!) . Page 115 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo From: Mike Howe<mike@mikehowe.ca> Sent:April 6, 2020 9:15 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Cc: Planning<Planning@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Comments re: Cannabis Draft By-law Dear Oro Medonte Planning Department, Town Council, and Mayor Hughes, My name is Mike Howe and I have lived in Oro—Medonte for 15 years. I currently reside at 54 Graham Street Oro-Medonte LOL2LO Thank you for your efforts in making the required amendments to the cannabis by-law to ensure it would prohibit Cannabis, including Hemp, in all agriculture zones in Oro-Medonte. A crop that requires high fencing, security, excessive water consumption and disturbs residents'quality of life with a pervasive odour, excessive noise, and artificial lighting, does not belong on lands that are close to residential settings. It belongs in an industrial land. Thank you for your leadership. I support the amended cannabis by-law. Regards Mike Howe 705.716.2853 Page 116 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Kia <kiagfa@yahoo.ca> Sent:April 6, 2020 2:13 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject:Zoning by-law amendment 2019 ZBA-01 cannabis production and processing facilities To Mayor Hughes, Town Council and Oro Medonte Planning Department, I am a resident of Oro-Medonte and strongly feel that Cannabis Production and Processing Facilities should NOT be on agricultural lands in Oro-Medonte. They should be restricted to rural industrial and economic development lands where neighbourhoods and communities are not impacted. Allowing this to happen on agricultural lands would be irresponsible and could have dire effects on our water supply, air quality and overall health. Crops grown on agricultural land, such as corn, do not require fencing and security and jeopardize our water supply. Cannabis is a different crop which requires a different set of rules and on dedicated lands in appropriate zones. It is encouraging to see Council making decisions that reflect the well being and health of its residents. support the amended cannabis by-law. Name:Mohammad Biouckzadeh Address:1753 Ridge Rd W Oro-Medonte On 11-011-211-0 Page 117 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Pam <pjoliveira@rogers.com> Sent: April 6, 2020 7:45 PM To: Cannabis <Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca>; Planning <Planning@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Comments re: Cannabis Draft By-law Dear Oro Medonte Planning Department, Town Council, and Mayor Hughes, My name is Pam Oliveira and I have lived in Oro —Medonte for 4 years. Thank you for your efforts in making the required amendments to the cannabis by-law to ensure it would prohibit Cannabis, including Hemp, in all agriculture zones in Oro- Medonte. A crop that requires high fencing, security, excessive water consumption and disturbs residents' quality of life with a pervasive odour, excessive noise, and artificial lighting, does not belong on lands that are close to residential settings. It belongs in an industrial land and I am against having this so close to my home. Thank you for your leadership. I support the amended cannabis by-law. Sincerely, Pam Oliveira Page 118 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: PAM OLIVEIRA <pjoliveira@rogers.com> Sent: April 6, 2020 7:53 PM To: Cannabis <Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca>; Planning <Planning@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Re: Comments re: Cannabis Draft By-law I'm sorry I did not include my address in first email, I live at 72 Red Oak Crescent. I have added to my email Thank you, Pam Oliveira > On Apr 6, 2020, at 7:45 PM, Pam <pjoliveira(d)rogers.com> wrote: > Dear Oro Medonte Planning Department, Town Council, and Mayor Hughes, > My name is Pam Oliveira and I have lived in Oro —Medonte for 4 years at 72 Red Oak Crescent. > Thank you for your efforts in making the required amendments to the cannabis by-law to ensure it would prohibit Cannabis, including Hemp, in all agriculture zones in Oro- Medonte. > A crop that requires high fencing, security, excessive water consumption and disturbs residents' quality of life with a pervasive odour, excessive noise, and artificial lighting, does not belong on lands that are close to residential settings. It belongs in an industrial land and I am against having this so close to my home. > Thank you for your leadership. I support the amended cannabis by-law. > Sincerely, > Pam Oliveira Page 119 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Paul Sanderson <psanderson@rogers.com> Sent:April 6, 2020 6:48 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca>; Planning<Planning@oro-medonte.ca> Cc: Dunn, Robin <rdunn@oro-medonte.ca>; Leigh, Andria <aleigh@oro-medonte.ca>; Hughes, Harry <harry.hughes@oro-medonte.ca>; Hough, Ralph <ralph.hough@oro-medonte.ca>; Ian Vetch Oro- medonte<ian.vetch@oro-medonte.ca>; DeSousa,Tammy<tammy.desousa@oro-medonte.ca>; Keane, Cathy<cathy.keane@oro-medonte.ca>; Scott, Shawn <shawn.scott@oro-medonte.ca>; Greenlaw, Randy<randy.greenlaw@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: INPUT Zoning By-law Amendment 2019-ZBA-01 Cannabis Production and Processing Facilities INPUT FOR THE PUBLIC RECORD Refer to: Zoning By-law Amendment 2019-ZBA-01 Cannabis Production and Processing Facilities I have been a regular seasonal resident of Oro-Medonte since 1953 and a permanent resident since 2003. I first wrote to the '14-'18 Council and Staff requesting a By-Law control measure for cannabis in March 2018, two years ago, and followed up with correspondence to the current Council and Staff at the time of the Bylaw extension from the original moratorium ICB. Thank you for the efforts on developing the current iteration of the Draft, as noted above and attached, and I DO support the most recent changes limiting the land use to ED and IR zones. Thank you again for this measure of progress. I DO support the abstract concept of minimum setback from a Sensitive Land Use; however, the proposed minimum setback of 150 m. is wholly inadequate, not based on science or fact and seems to be a plug number to simply acknowledge the issue and need with a check mark in the box. I DO support setbacks. A survey of Oro-Station people including, not limited to, emails already received by OM would certainly confirm the need for a minimum setback of at least 400 m. or preferably 500 m. to provide close to a real solution. Walk along the Rail Trail when the wind is blowing and you can confirm for Carmel Pharms a 150 m. setback will NOT work. I DO support larger setbacks. To proceed with an under performing setback of 150 m., as proposed, would not solve the issue(s) and said residents would have to wait and suffer another 2 years at least to get an increase in setback through Council. It is more proactive and favourable to reduce Page 120 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... setbacks later, if feasible, than it is to increase setbacks when the set value doesn't work. The Sensitive Land Use definition should also include and please add: ", all public roads" in the definition after 'public trail' and before 'or a community centre'. There is no need to be exposed to the cannabis odour through a vehicle HVAC system on the way to a community centre, school, or church. Roll up your windows on the way to kid's soccer is NOT a solution. I DO support the addition of these words to the Sensitive Land Use definition section. Even with the above adjustments, there needs to be some inclusion concerning the consumption of water and the need for proper Hydro capacity. I WILL support changes addressing these two unresolved and significant issues. Thank you in advance for your cooperation in the inclusion of the above items to improve the Draft By-Law. Sincerely, Paul Sanderson, 2251 Lakeshore Rd East, HAWKESTONE, ON LOL 1TO Page 121 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Peter Lamprey<petelamprey@gmail.com> Sent:April 6, 2020 7:12 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: By-law No. 2020-Draft (Cannabis Production and Processing Facilities) Mayor Harry Hughes Councillor Cathy Keane Ms. Andria Leigh, Director of Development Services Mr. Derek Witlib, Manager, Planning Services Township of Oro-Medonte 148 Line 7 South Oro-Medonte, Ontario LOL 2EO Dear Mayor Hughes, Councillor Keane, Ms. Leigh and Mr. Witlib: I am a long-time resident of the Village of Shanty Bay. I have reviewed the proposed amendment to Interim Control By-law 2018-109, via By-law No. 2020-Draft(A By-law to Amend Zoning By-law 97-95, as amended(Cannabis Production and Processing Facilities)). I fully support the said proposed By-law and I urge that it be passed and enforced as quickly as possible. I submit that any activity which features the consumption of large volumes of water, introduces a high quantity of waste and toxins into the ecosystem, emits noxious odours, and/or involves high perimeter fencing, has no business being located in any agricultural zoned land, and has no business being located in proximity to residential areas, schools, day care facilities,recreational facilities and churches. Cannabis production facilities disturb residents' quality of life with their pervasive odour, excessive noise, and artificial lighting, as well as their adverse impact on the water table which is so important to township residents. Their location throughout our Township does need to be carefully regulated. Sincerely, Peter Lamprey 3 Annwood Copse Oro-Medonte, Ontario LOL 2LO Page 122 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: suzanne robillard <suerobillard@hotmail.com> Sent:April 6, 2020 7:08 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: By-law No. 2020-Draft (Cannabis Production and Processing Facilities) Mayor Harry Hughes Councillor Cathy Keane Ms. Andria Leigh, Director of Development Services Mr. Derek Witlib, Manager, Planning Services Township of Oro-Medonte 148 Line 7 South Oro-Medonte, Ontario LOL 2EO Dear Mayor Hughes, Councillor Keane, Ms. Leigh and Mr. Witlib: I am a long-time resident of the Village of Shanty Bay. I have reviewed the proposed amendment to Interim Control By-law 2018-109, via By-law No. 2020-Draft (A By-law to Amend Zoning By-law 97-95, as amended (Cannabis Production and Processing Facilities)). I fully support the said proposed By-law and I urge that it be passed and enforced as quickly as possible. I submit that any activity which features the consumption of large volumes of water, introduces a high quantity of waste and toxins into the ecosystem, emits noxious odours, and/or involves high perimeter fencing, has no business being located in any agricultural zoned land, and has no business being located in proximity to residential areas, schools, day care facilities, recreational facilities and churches. Cannabis production facilities disturb residents' quality of life with their pervasive odour, excessive noise, and artificial lighting, as well as their adverse impact on the water table which is so important to township residents. Their location throughout our Township does need to be carefully regulated. Sincerely, Suzanne Robillard 3 Annwood Copse Oro-Medonte, Ontario LOL 21-0 Page 123 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Robert Young< � r � aan 2Csi �nail•c��� �> Date: 2020-04-06 7:58 PM (GMT-05:00) To: ". Council" <C'_ou ci .(u oro medonte.ctia> Subject: Zoning By-Law Amendment 2019-ZBA-01 I would like to voice my strong objection to the current location of the Cannabis Production and Processing Facility. Clearly, this production and processing facility,producing a product on a large "commercial, and industrial" scale, should be located on lands designated and designed for industries in Oro- Medonte,rather than in close proximity to a long, established residential area. That is just common sense. I am of the opinion that there should be a minimum set back of five hundred feet from sensitive land use areas. I note the work that Council has gone to date on this matter, and it is appreciated personally by myself and I believe the OM community at large. I request that Council consider these suggestions in revisiting the Draft By-Law. I thank you in advance for your consideration in this matter, much appreciated. Regards, Robert J. Young Page 124 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Stacey MacGregor<staceymacgregorl@gmail.com> Sent:April 6, 2020 9:30 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Cc: Planning<Planning@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Line2/3 development Our name is Kent and Stacey MacGregor we live at 928 Line 4 South. We are writing to let you know that we support the ammended by-law and that cannabis production and processing facilities should be restricted to rural industrial and economic development lands and NOT on agricultural lands. We are agriculture farmers and believe that allowing this will disrupt our community with the odour as well as the wildlife.We have children that go to Shanty Bay Public School and are concerned about having a business of this nature in such close proximity to a school. We are also concerned about land value depreciations due to this industry in our small community. Please feel free to contact us at 705-309-8755 Kent and Stacey MacGregor Page 125 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Caron Smith <bettyboop271@msn.com> Sent:April 7, 2020 4:18 AM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Cannabis and production facility Caron smith 94 William street Oro medonte 7057952367 I am writing to strongly oppose the facility that Oro is considering bringing into the township. Why would it be even a consideration in such a lovely township that so far has been unspoiled by the harshness of our close cities Not only to say in an area which is residential what this plant will do to our property prices. A school in close proximity The nature that has all ready been destroyed As a resident of oro who lives very close to this proposed property I am strongly against this the smell the traffic to say the least. This type of factory should be in a commercial sect not in a town of people. Oro medonte where is your loyalty to your residents I further want to add I work for an essential service on the weekend while trying to sleep for a 12 hour night shift. Workers who stated they were preparing the land for the grow of this product were using heavy machinery and had the audacity to say it was agricultural if therefore this has not yet been approved. Zoned why has this work commenced and trees shrubs been torn down??? I am very interested to hear your comments Caron smith. Oro resident Page 126 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... v i oi�j� '�Gei" myiY Ju'�W6 � W, / i Page 127 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... f fir F rr y i �y ,y n I Page 128 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... F A;* r IS w_ L' fu 9 'gyp r Page 129 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Heather Kerslake <heather.kerslake@icloud.com> Sent: April 7, 2020 5:52 AM To: Cannabis <Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Protect Agricultural Land To Oro- Medonte Council We are strongly against any bylaw changes that would allow the change in our Agricultural use of land. Heather & Roger Kerslake 3270 line 10 N Oro -Medonte L0L1 TO Page 130 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Davina Doorly<ddoorly@rogers.com> Sent:April 7, 2020 8:05 AM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Support of amendment Dear Mr Mayor and Councillors, We commend you for this new amendment. In our opinion a Cannabis growth and production industry DOES belong in land zoning IR and ED with careful considerations of set backs defended by research . Other townships are finding their setbacks not adequate. Cannabis growth and production is in its infancy in our country, province and townships. There is much to learn. Although such a crop nets our Federal and Provincial government large sums of money in taxes this is not the case for the township. The growth of this crop takes from growing food, produces a skunk like odour for up to 5 kilometres, the smell lingers on buildings and even clothing. Production facilities without extreme controls for odour, noise and light are disruptive to residents and local wild life. This changes the residents ability to enjoy their property. Health concerns relating to the atmospheric changes and possible contamination of water runoff near these locations have yet to be realized. We have many agricultural zoned lands in Oro Medonte frequently located beside residential areas. Corporations investing in Cannabis and its production are eagerly looking to invest in our rolling hills with agricultural designation. Your leadership in zoning this type of enterprise with diligence and foresight is crucial to keeping Oro Medonte the jewel that it is, a safe and healthy place to live, work , play and raise a family. The township bylaw although clearly written is as good as the enforcement that follows it. We put our faith in our elected officials to responsibly represent the residents of Oro Medonte and uphold all bylaws that are intended to guide and protect this valuable township. Page 131 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... Thank you to the council and all the staff for Working diligently during this time of Covid. Regards, Davina and Patrick Doorly 1121 Line 3 South OroMedonte Residents for 34 years. Page 132 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Sandra Currie<sandracurrie13@gmail.com> Sent:April 7, 2020 8:24 AM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Oro-Medonte Cannabis Bylaw To: cannabis@oro-medonte.ca; planning@oro-medonte.ca Subject: Comments re: Cannabis Draft By-law Dear Oro-Medonte Planning Department, Town Council, and Mayor Hughes, My name is Sandra Currie and I have lived in Oro—Medonte for 13 years. Thank you for your efforts in making the required amendments to the cannabis by-law to ensure it would prohibit Cannabis, including Hemp, in all agriculture zones in Oro-Medonte. A crop that requires high fencing, security, excessive water consumption and disturbs residents' quality of life with a pervasive odour, excessive noise, and artificial lighting, does not belong on lands that are close to residential settings. It belongs in an industrial land. Thank you for your leadership. I support the amended cannabis by-law. Sincerely, sawdra Curve 2120 Ridge Road West Shanty Bay Page 133 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: ajlm.richmond ajlm.richmond <ajIm.rich mond@sympatico.ca> Sent:April 6, 2020 1:02 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: meeting on cannabis We directly in line of sight at the potential cannabis grow area. I ask the following questions. I have not seen a notice at the area on third line south number 219 as to an application for change in use will this be coming? The owner can do what he wants to on his own land but are there some things he possibly do that require permits. Has the township started any court proceedings at 219 third line south. We are against any land use for cannabis in our area. I feel the council must make a firm stand on this possible outcome. The ruling I understand must come from Ottawa for cannabis production what has been the input been from our MP Mr. Shipley? I look forward to your reply, Alexander Richmond 144 William st. Oro-Medonte 705 722 7627 Page 134 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: The Rev. Canon John Anderson <rector@stjamesorillia.com> Sent: April 6, 2020 10:42 AM To: Cannabis <Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Letter of Objection Your Worship and Members of Council, I am resident of 20 O'Brien Street, Village of Shanty Bay. I am adding my name to a growing list of members of our community who oppose the intended development of a new cannabis and hemp production facility on 918 Line 3 South. I am aware that no application is pending at this date and steps are being taken to amend the control by-law. While recognizing the rights of private property owners the intended use for this property is not consistent with agricultural use and and the recreational activities that take place in the Village of Shanty Bay and one that is promoted by this Township. It is obvious to anyone that the destruction of trees (an environmental mistake and a detraction from the natural beauty of the Village and trial system), the digging of wells (yet there are issues with the water table), and the obvious major earthwork development that has and continues to take place suggests that this landowner has very little regard for the needs and cares of our quaint Village and for you as Council leaders. I am not oppose to cannabis and hemp production if it is in the right place and can be done so in a sustainable manner. However, to allow such a facility to open with close proximity to our community is objectionable for the reasons that have been cited in previous correspondence to you by like-minded residents of Shanty Bay. You have a duty and obligation to protect residential landowners throughout this Township from the obvious negative effects of such facilities including water usage, noxious smells, desolation of natural beauty, and continual use of lighting. Thank you for your consideration. Yours truly, Rev. Canon John E. Anderson, B.A. (Hons), LLB, M. Div. Page 135 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Cole <colin.bowler9@yahoo.com> Sent:April 6, 2020 11:34 AM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Proposed Cannabis Facility on 918 Line 3 South I am writing, as a resident of Oro-Medonte,to encourage you to reconsider plans to build a cannabis processing facility at the above location. While I am not opposed to such a facility in general, I believe that the proposed location is ill suited for such a plant. My main objections are of an environmental nature including the destruction of trees, digging of wells, and noise and light pollution. Thank you for your consideration. Yours Truly, The Rev. Colin C Bowler Anglican Priest Page 136 of 327 3.a\ 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment fnthe Zn... From: Kevin Bradley<Kevn.8rad|ey@/banie.ca> Sent:April 6' 2O2011:22AM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@uro'rnedunteza> Cc: Patty Bradley(Patty.Brad|ey@Geor0ianCo||eQe.ca)<Patty.8rad|ey@GeorQianCuUe8e.ca> Subject: RE: April 7th Public Meeting Regarding Cannabis Production on Agricultural Lands Dear 0ro-Medon1ePlanning Department,Town Council, and Mayor Hughes, My name is Kevin Bradley and I have lived at 23 Martine Crescent in Shanty Bay for 8 years. My family made the deliberate decision 10 relocate Lo Shanty Bay for its rustic charm, quiet feel, and high public safety. Any industrial operation, which cannabis production clearly is, in any proximity to the settlement would force us to revisit that decision and to search for another community for our family to live in. Therefore, I applaud your efforts in making the required amendments to the cannabis by-law to ensure it would prohibit Cannabis, including Hemp, in all agriculture zones in Oro-MedVnte. A crop that requires high fencing, security, excessive water consumption and disturbs residents' quality of life with a pervasive odour, excessive noise, and artificial lighting, does not belong on lands that are close tm residential settings. It belongs in an industrial land. Thank you for your leadership. | support the amended cannabis by-|aw. Sincerely, Kevin Bradley 23 Martine Crescent Shanty Bay, C}N L0L2L0 705-737-0302 Page 137 Of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Linda <linda.huisman@yahoo.ca> Sent:April 6, 2020 12:50 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca>; Planning<Planning@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Comments re: Cannabis Draft By-law Good Day Oro-Medonte Planning Department, Town Council, and Mayor Hughes, We are Robert Balchin and Linda Huisman, residents of Oro-Medonte in Shanty Bay since 2005. We live at 34 Red Oak Crescent, in Arbourwood. Thank you for your efforts in making the required amendments to the cannabis by-law to ensure it would prohibit Cannabis, including Hemp, in all agriculture zones in Oro-Medonte. We are very concerned about a crop, such as Cannabis, that has a requirement for : -High fencing -Security -Excessive water consumption -Heavy vehicle traffic -Artificial lighting Just to name a few. The impact that a Cannabis production and processing facility can have on the residents' quality of life,health and safety are numerous. Including: -skunk-like odour that will impact residents outdoor enjoyment and ability to open windows for fresh air. Possible exposure to concentrated chemicals emitted in the air that can trigger health issues. -excessive noise from generators -increased traffic, especially heavy vehicle traffic, that will impact the safety of residents and enjoyment of walking and biking in a rural setting. -potential for increased crime in the area -decrease of our land and home values A Cannabis production and processing facility on agricultural lands close to residential communities does not align at all with the values and quality of life that Oro-Medonte has promoted and celebrated for many years. Thank you for your leadership. We support the amended cannabis by-law. We oppose cannabis production and processing facilities on agricultural lands and especially on lands close to our residential communities. Page 138 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... Sincerely, Robert Balchin and Linda Huisman 34 Red Oak Crescent Shanty Bay Oro-Medonte Page 139 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Kelly Mcsmithjak <timberbear6@gmail.com> Sent: April 6, 2020 11:12 AM To: Cannabis <Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca>; Planning <Planning@oro-medonte.ca> Cc: Phil Holjak <phil.holjak@magna.com> Subject: Comments re: Cannabis Draft By-law My name is Kelly Holjak and I have lived in Oro-Medonte for 8 yrs total. My husbands' work has had us move a fair bit, even as far as NC. However, twice we have had the opportunity to move back to Ontario and both times we have chosen the beautiful community of shanty bay. Thank you for your efforts in making the required amendments to the cannabis by-law to ensure it would prohibit Cannabis, including Hemp, in all agriculture zones in Oro- Medonte. A crop that requires high fencing, security, excessive water consumption and disturbs residents' quality of life with a pervasive odour, excessive noise, and artificial lighting, does not belong on lands that are close to residential settings. It belongs on industrial land. Thank you for your leadership. I support the amended cannabis by-law. Sincerely, Kelly Holjak Page 140 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: David Levison <glendeninghorse@g mail.com> Sent: April 6, 2020 12:22 PM To: Cannabis <Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Cannabis by-law To all council members of Oro-Medonte: I am writing to add my support for your recently proposed by-law regarding the growing of cannabis in Oro- Medonte. Although my immediate community is of concern the whole of Oro-Medonte could be affected by the lack of a strong by-law. I commend everyone of you for your hard work on this and it will be a legacy all can be proud of. David Levison, 817 Line 2 South, Oro-Medonte, LOL 2L0 Page 141 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: bryn80@rogers.com <bryn80@rogers.com> Sent:April 6, 2020 10:33 AM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: 918 Line 3 South Oro-Medonte Comments and questions for April 7 meeting regarding 918 Line 3 South, Oro-Medonte Comment-The bylaw is excellent and offers a reasonable solution. Thank you for the efforts of council and staff on behalf of the residents of Oro-Medonte. Questions- 1.Have the landowners near the planned areas that are proposed to be allowed to grow cannabis been consulted about their opinion on this issue? • 2.If the bylaw is passed, but then appealed to LPAT,will Aird and Berlis (who have never lost at PAT when representing Oro-Medonte) be the legal representation for Oro-Medonte. • 3. Have Aird and Berlis or another legal firm been asked to give an opinion of the likelihood of success for Oro-Medonte at an PAT hearing. • 4.Considerable work is occurring on the site including a significant change in land grading. Does this grade change require a permit under the Ontario Building Code? • 5.What steps are available to Oro-Medonte for any alleged violations of the building code? How large a fine is possible. • 6. Has a stop work order or injunction been considered? Thankyou Bryn Pressnail 5 Bay St Oro-Medonte,ON Page 142 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From:Joy Levison <levisonlaw@on.aibn.com> Sent:April 6, 2020 12:21 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Re: Proposed draft by-law restricting Cannabis to Industrial zoning Dear Mr. Mayor, and Councillors, I am writing to express my strong support for the draft by-law as amended restricting the production and growth of Cannabis to Industrially Zoned lands, and specifically restricting it from agricultural/rural zones. I commend you on your strength and vision in taking this move, and for responding to the stated wishes of your electorate. Every politician at every level of government must at some point think about their legacy. The strong leadership and the will to enforce the bylaw will be this council's legacy. This is not a debate about Cannabis, and whether it is good or evil, it is the law of the land. You have however as municipal council been delegated the very onerous task of deciding WHERE the growth and processing of this crop is appropriate, and in accordance with good planning principals, and for the well being of your constituents. Neither the Federal nor the Provincial governments have addressed this most vital concern. You will no doubt get representation from OMAFRA that according to PPS 2014 cannabis is an agricultural crop and as such belongs in an agricultural zone. I would like to point out that at the time this Policy Statement was produced, only hemp for edible oil products,fiber, and edible grains were permitted—food stuffs essentially. This policy statement was not updated when growing and processing Cannabis became legal across Canada. As a farmer, my husband and I have found OMAFRA eager to help an ailing farm economy, by supporting alternative crops, like hemp, alternative livestock, like llamas and buffalo, and agritourism, none of which feeds the population. None of which has assisted the agricultural sector. While this is about, the whole of Oro-Medonte, and not just the Community of Shanty Bay, anyone who has witnessed the destruction of a formerly beautiful and productive farm,to repurpose for what is clearly an industrial use, can be nothing but appalled. The perpetrators have ignored the existing by- law, and hide behind the guise of agricultural use. Work goes on even today, and despite the Emergency Measure declared by the provincial Governments. I support you in the passing of this draft by-law, and will support you in the enforcement of it in future. Well done. Thank you, K. Joy Levison 817 Line 2 South, Oro-Medonte, On LOL 2L0 Page 143 of 327 Mice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... AFR 0 TOWN g . � a s�m D ._ 1C.�.._......... .......Cc'.. ._L-G .. _._ _2,.. ........ ----: ct- ' f r -- r y ' r 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo From: Kimberly Crook<cr'o" 'o,k"k,i,m,b"err,," I,Date: 2020-04-06 8:32 AM (GMT-05:00) To: "Keane, Cathy" <.c.gIh_ .keane'&)(o)ro ryiedontexq> Subject: Amendment to zoning by law 97-95 Good Afternoon Mayor Hughes and Members of Council. As a resident of Oro-Medonte, I would like my position noted that any cannabis production and processing facilities should 100% not be permitted in any adjacent lands to residential areas that currently have any homes or schools. I know the draft zoning by-law will be coming for review by council and I would like this position considered. These types of facilities belong in industrial zoned areas only not in areas intended for traditional Agriculture. Thank you, Kimberly Crook Page 145 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Ian Kay <yaknai@yahoo.com> Sent: April 6, 2020 8:23 AM To: Cannabis <Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Asking for clarification After reading the proposed bylaw I was unclear on one point. Would the growing of hemp (for fibre, etc.) on agricultural land be permitted with the wording as it stands? Ian Kay 1064 Line 6 N Oro-Medonte ON LOL2E0 705 816 4695 Page 146 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: grenlea grenlea «Uenlea sympatico.ca> Sent: Monday, April 6, 2020 9:30 AM To: Hughes, Harry<h r te.ca>; . Council < un iV or�.redoto >; Dunn, Robin � no C _ . ic <r a_rJ_rJ. c ro::: I ._ a>;Teeter,Janette<jeeter oro-medorte.ca> Subject: Cannabis Facility Line 7 Council, With regards to the Line 7 cannabis facility,promises seem to have been made with regard to noise,odour and light. In Orillia Matters on April 5th, Mr.Hughes is quoted, "Unfortunately none of those promises were held to 100 percent". I submit the following queries: Were these promises made in writing? If not, why not? Were there penalties should such promises not be fulfilled 100 per cent? If not, why not? To whom were these unkept promises made and have they been held accountable? If not, why not? Are the individuals who accepted the promises which were not fulfilled 100 percent still in positions to make future agreements? If so, why? Have the residents been compensated because, unfortunately none of the odour, noise and light promises where held to 100 per cent? In not, why not? Howard Leake Greenwood Forest Rd. Oro-Medonte Page 147 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: HASTINGS, KELLY<Kelly.Hastings@bmo.com> Sent:April 6, 2020 8:59 AM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Cc: Planning<Planning@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Cannabis Draft By-law Dear Oro Medonte Planning Department,Town Council, and Mayor Hughes, My name is Elda Hastings and I have lived in Oro—Medonte for 80 years. Thank you for your efforts in making the required amendments to the cannabis by-law to ensure it would prohibit Cannabis, including Hemp, in all agriculture zones in Oro-Medonte. A crop that requires high fencing, security, excessive water consumption and disturbs residents' quality of life with a pervasive odour, excessive noise, and artificial lighting, does not belong on lands that are close to residential settings. It belongs in an industrial land. Thank you for your leadership. I support the amended cannabis by-law. Sincerely, Elda Page 148 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: HASTINGS, KELLY<Kelly.Hastings@bmo.com> Sent:April 6, 2020 8:56 AM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Cc: Planning<Planning@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Cannabis Draft By-law Dear Oro Medonte Planning Department,Town Council, and Mayor Hughes, My name is Charlie Hastings and I have lived in Oro—Medonte for 85 years. Thank you for your efforts in making the required amendments to the cannabis by-law to ensure it would prohibit Cannabis, including Hemp, in all agriculture zones in Oro-Medonte. A crop that requires high fencing, security, excessive water consumption and disturbs residents' quality of life with a pervasive odour, excessive noise, and artificial lighting, does not belong on lands that are close to residential settings. It belongs in an industrial land. Thank you for your leadership. I support the amended cannabis by-law. Sincerely, Charlie Page 149 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From:Terri Kyle<kyleterri@gmail.com> Sent:April 5, 2020 8:29 AM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Cc: harry.huges@oro-medonte.ca; Keane, Cathy<cathy.keane@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Re: Zoning By-law Amendment 2019-ZBA-01 Further to my email below, I wanted to add my address: Terri Kyle 1044 Line 2 South Oro-Medonte, ON LOL 2LO phone is 705 790 9268 On Sun, Apr 5, 2020 at 8:24 AM Terri Kyle <kyleterri(a)gmail.com>wrote: With regards to the By-law to Amend Zoning By-law 97-95, I am writing to give my support to the Draft Zoning By-law Amendment which proposes permission for cannabis production and processing facilities in the following zones: 1. Rural Industrial(IR);and 2. Economic Development(ED). I do not support allowing a Cannabis Production and Processing or the outdoor growing of Cannabis to be put in an area zoned Agricultural Use or specialized agricultural use. I fully support the passing of the draft bylaw amendment regarding Cannabis Production and Processing Facilities. Please make my position known to the Township. Thank you, Terri Kyle Page 150 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Wayne Lambert<lambert7015@gmail.com> Sent:April 5, 2020 12:45 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Fwd: Proposed Cannabis By-Law I'am sending this email due to the serious detrimental effects the Cannabis operation between the 2nd& 3rd concessions will cause to the Township and it's residence. The site so close to Shanty Bay will be dangerous to the near by residence and a waste of prime agricultural land better served by providing food products or feed for livestock that will support the entire community. I have driven by and inspected the site from both sides and this operation should not be allowed to continue in any form in any part of the township we don't need cannabis business of any kind in the Township. I have viewed the Draft Cannabis By-Law and support it completely with one exception commercial land should not be allowed to be used. As a former land and business owner and now a retired resident in the Township I believe that a business near the site of a Cannabis operation will be compromised and any new future development will be discouraged by the adverse conditions that will occur in an ongoing fashion. You will not be able to put the Genie back into the bottle. Thank You Wayne Lambert 11 Palm Beach Road Oro-Medonte LOL 1 TO Page 151 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Laurie Stanford <lauriejstanford@gmail.com> Sent:April 5, 2020 6:53 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca>; Planning<Planning@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Comments re Cannabis Draft By-law To: cannabiskoro-medonte.ca; planningkoro-medonte.ca Subject: Comments re: Cannabis Draft By-law Dear Oro Medonte Planning Department, Town Council, and Mayor Hughes, My name is Laurie Stanford and I have lived in Oro—Medonte for 36 years. Thank you for your efforts in making the required amendments to the cannabis by-law to ensure it would prohibit Cannabis, including Hemp, in all agriculture zones in Oro-Medonte. A crop that requires high fencing, security, excessive water consumption and disturbs residents' quality of life with a pervasive odour, excessive noise, and artificial lighting, does not belong on lands that are close to residential settings. It belongs in an industrial land. Over the past few days many residents of Shanty Bay and beyond have been out enjoying the rail trail and many whom I have spoken with, from a distance are distressed, dismayed and discouraged to see the damage that has already been done to the beautiful country side.This facility has no place with the goals described in the strategic plan. Please do all that you can to prevent further development of this facility. Thank you for your leadership. I support the amended cannabis by-law. Sincerely, Laurie Stanford Page 152 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: pjarry@maisonplacements.com <pjarry@maisonplacements.com> Sent:April 5, 2020 12:44 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Cc: Keane, Cathy<cathy.keane@oro-medonte.ca> Subject:Zoning by-law Amendment 2019-ZBA-01 Cannabis Production and Processing Facilities To the Oro-Medonte Planning Department, Town Council and Mayor Hughes My name is Pauline Jarry and I reside at 19 Red Oak Crescent Oro- Medonte. I am in favor of the proposed amendment to the cannabis by-law prohibiting cannabis and cannabis related activities in agricultural zones in Oro-Medonte. Page 153 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Nora Gavarre<kareninamalcolm@hotmail.com> Sent:April 5, 2020 9:25 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Cc: Hughes, Harry<harry.hughes@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Cannabis Production and Processing Facilities Dear; Mayor Hughes, Council and Township Staff I have reviewed the amended updated draft by-law for Cannabis Production and Processing Facilities and I am in support on regulating this type of activity to specific areas within the township. I feel it would be a tremendous error to allow this type of activity on any agricultural lands throughout the township. This is not a traditional agricultural use, it does not produce a food source and the extensive security has never been seen before on agricultural lands. This industry is so new to Canada and unfortunately small townships don't have the economic means to regulate and monitor it. There is no clear data available as to how much this industry costs townships in staff time, complaint response and enforcement. Therefore it is only prudent to proceed with caution and limit the areas where such industry can locate. Many municipalities include, enforcement, powers of entry and powers of inspection on this industry in their by- laws to further protect residents. The township needs to protect its citizens from public nuisances and activity that has the potential of becoming an annoyance, especially in settlement areas. I think this by-law has shown real leadership on behalf of township staff and Council. The only suggestion we would have is to broaden the definitions and to make the by-law more all- encompassing by including: • Cannabis-Related Activity-growing, process, extracting, packaging or otherwise making ready for sale, testing, destroying, storing, shipping, permitting consumption or sale of Cannabis or Cannabis Products. Thank you for your consideration, Mr. M & Ms. N. Gavarre 74 Red Oak Cr. Oro-Medonte, ON Page 154 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo From: Mike Howe<mike@mikehowe.ca> Sent:April 5, 2020 12:59 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Cc: Planning<Planning@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Comments re: Cannabis Draft By-law Dear Oro Medonte Planning Department, Town Council, and Mayor Hughes, My name is Mike Howe and I have lived in Oro—Medonte for 15 years. Thank you for your efforts in making the required amendments to the cannabis by-law to ensure it would prohibit Cannabis, including Hemp, in all agriculture zones in Oro-Medonte. A crop that requires high fencing, security, excessive water consumption and disturbs residents'quality of life with a pervasive odour, excessive noise, and artificial lighting, does not belong on lands that are close to residential settings. It belongs in an industrial land. Thank you for your leadership. I support the amended cannabis by-low. Regards Mike Howe 705.716.2853 Page 155 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... WEST ON CONSULTING planning + urban design VIA EMAIL April 7, 2020 File 9785 Township of Oro-Medonte 148 Line 7 South Oro-Medonte ON, 1_01. 2EO Attn: Mayor & Members of Council Re: Public Meeting Application 2019-ZBA-01 Cannabis Production & Processing Facilities 837 Line 7 South, Township of Oro-Medonte Weston Consulting is the planning consultant for Carmel Pharms Corp., the operator of a cannabis production and processing facility at 837 Line 7 South. We have become aware of the most recent draft zoning by-law amendment pertaining to the above application and we are concerned about the proposed amendment's negative impact on our client's existing operations and potential future expansion. Prior to further consideration and the passing of this proposed amendment, we request a meeting with Town Planning Staff it) order to discuss the amendment's impact on our client's operations and potential needed revisions. Please also provide us with notification of any future public consultation sessions and/or decisions regarding this matter. Yours truly, Weston Consulting Per: Hobert Walters KPL., MCIR RPP Associate C. Dustin Laren, Carmel Cannabis VaughanOffices 2(',)1 Mil 19, C)ntafio I I K5K8 T.905,738.8080 Toronto Office 268F3erk(-,1HyS1re;--�t, Fc)[o,to (Dritariot05AD5 �'A�6,640.9917 Page 156 of 1327r1�11111 F,905,738,6637 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: grenlea grenlea <gren lea @sympatico.ca> Sent:April 5, 2020 4:11 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Cannabis Facility Line 2/3 Council, I am not against legal cannabis growing or use. I am however against any industrial processing near a residential area and which is near Lake Simcoe particularly when there are zoned industrial areas within the Township. During the election I had the opportunity to meet the residents whose lives have been negatively impacted by the the facility on Line 7. An error of this kind should not have happened! As mentioned on April 5th 2020 in"Orillia Today",promises were made but not 100%kept. There is no room in this situation for a similar error! Learn from Line 7. All processing must go into industrial lands well away from residential areas and in particular significant villages such as Shanty Bay! Regards, Howard Leake 25 Greenwood Forest Rd. Oro-Medonte Page 157 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo From:Joshua Manolakos<joshua.manolakos@gmail.com> Sent:April 5, 2020 11:04 PIVI To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca>; Planning<Planning@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Comments re: Cannabis Draft By-law Dear Oro Medonte Planning Department, Town Council, and Mayor Hughes, My name is Dr. Joshua Manolakos and I have lived in Oro—Medonte for 3 years. Thank you for your efforts in making the required amendments to the cannabis by-law to ensure it would prohibit Cannabis, including Hemp, in all agriculture zones in Oro-Medonte. A crop that requires high fencing, security, excessive water consumption and disturbs residents'quality oj'life with a pervasive odour, excessive noise, and artificial lighting, does not belong on lands that are close to residential settings, schools and public green spaces. It belongs in industrial land. Thank you for your leadership. I support the amended cannabis by-law. Sincerely, Dr. Joshua Manolakos 41 Church St, Shanty Bay Page 158 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo From: Lauren Manolakos<Iauren.manolakos@gmail.com> Sent:April 5, 2020 10:36 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca>; Planning<Planning@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Comments re: Cannabis Draft By-law Dear Oro Medonte Planning Department, Town Council, and Mayor Hughes, My name is Dr. Lauren Manolakos and/have lived in Oro—Medonte for 3 years. Thank you for your efforts in making the required amendments to the cannabis by-law to ensure it would prohibit Cannabis, including Hemp, in a//agriculture zones in Oro- Medonte. A crop that requires high fencing, security, excessive water consumption and disturbs residents'quality of life with a pervasive odour, excessive noise, and artificial lighting, does not belong on lands that are close to residential settings, schools and public green spaces. It belongs in industrial land. Thank you for your leadership. I support the amended cannabis by-low. Sincerely, Dr. Lauren Manolakos 41 Church St, Shanty Bay Page 159 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo From: debbie howe<clebbiehowe2000@yahoo.com> Sent:April 5, 2020 1:07 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Cc: Planning<Planning@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Comments re: Cannabis Draft By-law Dear Oro Medonte Planning Department, Town Council, and Mayor Hughes, My name is Deborah Howe and/have lived in Shanty Bay far 15 years. /have four children who have attended/currently attend Shanty Bay Public School. Thank you for your efforts in making the required amendments to the cannabis by-law to ensure it would prohibit Cannabis, including Hemp, in a//agriculture zones in Oro-Medonte. A crop that requires high fencing, security, excessive water consumption and disturbs residents'quality of life with a pervasive odour, excessive noise, and artificial lighting, does not belong on lands that are close to residential settings or near to a school. It belongs in an industrial land. Thank you, I support the amended cannabis by-low. Regards Deborah Howe 705.716.2852 Page 160 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Danny Aube <dannyaube56@gmail.com> Sent:April 5, 2020 2:48 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: By law changes HI Mayor and Counsel, My name is Daniel Aube, address is 4 Forester Road, Oro- medonte, LOL 2LO . My concern tonight is the destruction of the agricultural land on line 3 with the assumption of a cannabis grow up within the neighbor hood of Shanty Bay. With schools and parks with in distance. This will be no place to raise your kids. Unless maybe you can built a few Narcotics Anonymous centers with in the jurisdiction. Please don't let this happen. Yours truly, Daniel Aube Page 161 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Ross or June Cotton<ridgenet@rogers.com> Sent:April 5, 2020 5:49 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Cannabis Draft Zoning By-law Amendment Mayor and Counsellors We would ask that the Mayor and Counsellors vote to accept the Cannabis Draft Zoning By-law Amendment. Ross & June Cotton 1445 Ridge Rd. W. Oro Medonte On 1-01-21-0 Page 162 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... Peter and Christine Lang 63 Raikes Street Oro Medonte, Ontario, LOL 21-0 April 6, 2020 Mayor Harry Hughes Township of Oro Medonte 148 Line 7 South Oro Medonte, Ontario LOL 2E0 Re: By-law No. 2020 Draft A By-law to Amend Zoning By-law 97-95, as amended. (Cannabis Production and Processing Facilities Your Worship: We are residents of Oro-Medonte. We live in the village of Shanty Bay. We are writing to express thoughts on the proposed amendment to Zoning By-law 97-95 Cannabis Production and Processing Facilities. If we understand it correctly, the Township is proposing that Cannabis Production and Processing Facilities should not be allowed on Agricultural zoned land but, on land zoned Rural Industrial and/or Economic Development. We assume that this would allow for such processing facilities, as referenced above, to operate along Highway 11 or along Conc. 7, north, which is already home to an airport facility and is an established trucking route. We are aware that there is a Cannabis Production Facility at Oro Station but we are not sure how this land was zoned. That being said, it is difficult to ascertain as to whether the growing of hemp is agricultural in nature. It would appear to be so. We have an example of hemp being grown on agricultural zoned land at Dalston (unless we are mistaken and this land is zoned commercial). At any rate, the property we wish to address in this letter is situated on the 3rd Conc. of Oro- Medonte. This property runs beside the recreational rail trail and backs onto many homes in the village of Shanty Bay. This land is clearly zoned agricultural and as such is not an appropriate place to install a Cannabis Production and Processing Facility. As you are aware, the land is being prepared and there is much speculation as to what the present owner has in mind. It is with much concern that we are writing you to express our opinion that there must be more appropriate land for such an industry in Oro-Medonte than beside a rural and historic community such as Shanty Bay. On another note, if the land is being developed for growing hemp, an agricultural crop, we have concerns regarding the impact this would have on the surrounding water table and run off of fertilizer and pesticides to neighbouring properties and ultimately to the Lake. Again, we are not familiar with what is necessitated in order to grow 250 acres of hemp. Page 163 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... So to summarize: 1) We are in favour of changing the by-law to limit Cannabis production and processing facilities to be located on commercially zoned land not agricultural zoned land; and 2) We are asking that Council put measures in place to ensure that Lake Simcoe and surrounding residential properties will not be negatively impacted by a large agricultural endeavour as is being observed happening on the 311 Conc. of Oro-Medonte beside the recreational rail trail just outside the village of Shanty Bay. Sincerely, Christine and Peter Lang Cc: Cathy Keane, Councillor for Ward 3 Page 164 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Stephen <stephen.w.moro@gmail.com> Sent:April 5, 2020 3:21 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Cc: Stephen Moro<Stephen.w.moro@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Draft bylaw to amend zoning bylaw 97-95 A follow up note and questions: I just drove by the 3rd line site and construction is still in full swing. I find it odd that the company would continue on knowing that a bylaw amendment would shut down their operations. Is council aware of any loophole or other methods by which they would be allowed to continue? I also reviewed the land use map that exists on the Oro Medonte official plan site as Schedule A and there does not seem to be any lands that are allocated to Economic Development lands? Is the list provided in the bylaw amendment presentation a full list or are there other potential ED lands? Thank you Cheers Stephen On Apr 5, 2020, at 10:02 AM, Stephen Moro <, 1e.phen.w.moro(d) nail.com>wrote: Hello, Thank you for allowing us to provide our input in consideration of the draft bylaw amendment to restrict cannabis and hemp production to industrial and economic development lands only. As a community, we are entitled to participate in the decision making. We have rights under the environmental bill of rights to be consulted and have impact on decision making on matters that effect our environment, including air quality, water, noise, light and natural resources. We oppose the use of the existing agricultural lands in Oro Medonte for the production of cannabis products, in particular, the site currently being developed for this purpose at Line 3 and Line 4 north of Ridge Rd. Page 165 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... Given our options currently, we support the use of existing industrial and economic development land for the production of cannabis products. We would also like to reiterate comments we had submitted in previous emails: Cannabis requires significant water and irrigation. Have studies been made on the effect it will have on surrounding community wells? If our water quality or quantity is affected by this venture, what will be our recourse and who will pay for it? What will be the effect on surrounding lands and Lake Simcoe? Significant work and investment have been made over the years, led by the LSRCA to protect our aquifers and this body of water. The proximity of our town and the runoff from operations is of concern. Will there be leaching and contamination into the lake and surrounding properties and how will this be managed, assessed and remediated if needed? Cannabis and hemp farming processes produce significant noise, air pollution from burn offs, light pollution and truck traffic. They must be restricted to operate in areas that do not impact existing neighbourhoods, schools and public parks. Cannabis may be classified as an agricultural crop, but the security concerns attached to it produce a cartel-like atmosphere with drones, security cameras and guards. This is not a condition we as a community should welcome to our town. We have been watching the significant destruction of trees along Line 2 and the rail trail as well as a massive earth moving operations. What will this look like when its all done? How do these operations align with townships vision of Oro Medonte? As a new agricultural process, have sufficient studies been conducted to fully understand all the impacts these businesses will have? Page 166 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... We believe that property values in proximity to these facilities will decrease substantially as a result of their direct negative impact on the quality of life enjoyed on these properties. Is the town not responsible? Will property taxes then be reassessed and lowered? As the current bylaw amendment is being considered, significant work is still being carried out on the Line3/Line2 project site. My concern is that even with the bylaw amendment passing, the company responsible will continue to operate somehow despite the contraventions to our bylaws. Or worse, that they move to successfully rezone the existing agricultural land to commercial or economic development and continue along as planned, despite the community objections. Is this the future of Oro Medonte? Our landscape is changing for the worse from the reasons we originally moved here, seemingly beginning with the Burls Creek event grounds that now operates despite significant community opposition. We ask our community leadership to not allow developers and business interests to reap the benefit of our agricultural lands and leave us with the aftermath. Respectfully and with thanks, Stephen and Sonja Moro 1250 Line 3 South Oro Medonte Page 167 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo From:Terri Kyle<kyleterri@gmail.com> Sent:April 5, 2020 8:25 AM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Cc: harry.huges@oro-medonte.ca; Keane, Cathy<cathy.keane@oro-medonte.ca> Subject:Zoning By-law Amendment 2019-ZBA-01 With regards to the By-law to Amend Zoning By-law 97-95, 1 am writing to give my support to the Draft Zoning By-law Amendment which proposes permission for cannabis production and processing facilities in the following zones: 1. Rural Industrial(IR);and 2. Economic Development(ED). I do not support allowing a Cannabis Production and Processing or the outdoor growing of Cannabis to be put in an area zoned Agricultural Use or specialized agricultural use. I fully support the passing of the draft by-law amendment regarding Cannabis Production and Processing Facilities. Please make my position known to the Township. Thank you, Terri Kyle Page 168 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo From: debbie howe<clebbiehowe2000@yahoo.com> Sent:April 5, 2020 2:02 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Cc: Planning<Planning@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Comments re: Cannabis Draft By-law Dear Oro Medonte Planning Department, Town Council, and Mayor Hughes, My name is Deborah Howe and/have lived in Shanty Bay far 15 years. /have four children who have attended/currently attend Shanty Bay Public School. Thank you for your efforts in making the required amendments to the cannabis by-law to ensure it would prohibit Cannabis, including Hemp, in a//agriculture zones in Oro-Medonte. A crop that requires high fencing, security, excessive water consumption and disturbs residents'quality of life with a pervasive odour, excessive noise, and artificial lighting, does not belong on lands that are close to residential settings or near to a school. It belongs in an industrial land. Thank you, I support the amended cannabis by-low. Regards Deborah Howe 705.716.2852 My address is 54 Graham St, Oro Medonte Page 169 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Stephen Moro<stephen.w.moro@gmail.com> Sent:April 5, 2020 10:03 AM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Cc: Stephen Moro<stephen.w.moro@gmail.com> Subject: Draft bylaw to amend zoning bylaw 97-95 Hello, Thank you for allowing us to provide our input in consideration of the draft bylaw amendment to restrict cannabis and hemp production to industrial and economic development lands only. As a community, we are entitled to participate in the decision making. We have rights under the environmental bill of rights to be consulted and have impact on decision making on matters that effect our environment, including air quality, water, noise, light and natural resources. We oppose the use of the existing agricultural lands in Oro Medonte for the production of cannabis products, in particular, the site currently being developed for this purpose at Line 3 and Line 4 north of Ridge Rd. Given our options currently, we support the use of existing industrial and economic development land for the production of cannabis products. We would also like to reiterate comments we had submitted in previous emails: Cannabis requires significant water and irrigation. Have studies been made on the effect it will have on surrounding community wells? If our water quality or quantity is affected by this venture, what will be our recourse and who will pay for it? What will be the effect on surrounding lands and Lake Simcoe? Significant work and investment have been made over the years, led by the LSRCA to protect our aquifers and this body of water. The proximity of our town and the runoff from operations is of Page 170 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... concern. Will there be leaching and contamination into the lake and surrounding properties and how will this be managed, assessed and remediated if needed? Cannabis and hemp farming processes produce significant noise, air pollution from burn offs, light pollution and truck traffic. They must be restricted to operate in areas that do not impact existing neighbourhoods, schools and public parks. Cannabis may be classified as an agricultural crop, but the security concerns attached to it produce a cartel-like atmosphere with drones, security cameras and guards. This is not a condition we as a community should welcome to our town. We have been watching the significant destruction of trees along Line 2 and the rail trail as well as a massive earth moving operations. What will this look like when its all done? How do these operations align with townships vision of Oro Medonte? As a new agricultural process, have sufficient studies been conducted to fully understand all the impacts these businesses will have? We believe that property values in proximity to these facilities will decrease substantially as a result of their direct negative impact on the quality of life enjoyed on these properties. Is the town not responsible? Will property taxes then be reassessed and lowered? As the current bylaw amendment is being considered, significant work is still being carried out on the Line3/Line2 project site. My concern is that even with the bylaw amendment passing, the company responsible will continue to operate somehow despite the contraventions to our bylaws. Or worse, that they move to successfully rezone the existing agricultural land to commercial or economic development and continue along as planned, despite the community objections. Is this the future of Oro Medonte? Our landscape is changing for the worse from the reasons we originally moved here, seemingly beginning with the Burls Creek event grounds that now operates despite significant community opposition. We ask our community leadership to not allow developers and business interests to reap the benefit of our agricultural lands and leave us with the aftermath. Page 171 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... Respectfully and with thanks, Stephen and Sonja Moro 1250 Line 3 South Oro Medonte Page 172 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Gerry Johnson <colorimage@sympatico.ca> Sent:April 5, 2020 11:45 AM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca>; . Council <Council@oro-medonte.ca>; Hughes, Harry <harry.hughes@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Proposed Amendment to Oro-Medonte Zoning Bylaw 97-95 Dear, Members of Oro-Medonte Council. In response to your notification of March 31,2020 concerning By-law No. 2020-Draft. Please find attached letter dated April 5, 2020 pertaining to the Proposed Amendment to Oro-Medonte Zoning Bylaw 97-95. Along with a copy referencing the "Municipal Guide to Cannabis Legalization" issued by the Federation of Canadian Municipalities—Spring 2018. (which I assume you a familiar with). Please do not hesitate to contact me should you require any further information or clarification. Respectfully, 1 Red Oak Crescent, Oro a onte,ON LOL 21.0 Mobile:70 -89 -274 Email:colloiri a g.@.U1 .�i o.ca Page 173 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Darrell Turner <dmturner@rogers.com> Sent: April 4, 2020 3:31 PM To: Cannabis <Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca>; Darrell Turner <dmturner@rogers.com> Subject: Darrell Turner 12 William Street Shanty Bay Is there anything in this draft bylaw that would not prevent a cannabis operation (excepting a hemp farming operation) from being started? The one that I am concerned about is the possible one between the bottom of the 2nd and 3rd in Shanty Bay. Darrell Turner Page 174 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: dianne cuzner<bcmtnchk@yahoo.com> Sent:April 4, 2020 6:11 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Cc:Veitch, Ian<ian.veitch@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Subject: Draft by-law Cannabis Processing and Production Facilities To whom it may concern: Subject: Draft by-law Cannabis Processing and Production Facilities I am a long time Oro-Medonte Township resident and have been following in the news many aspects of the cannabis industry and the issues that are arising while municipalities are scrambling to get regulations in place. I have read the draft by-law and I support the stricter controls being proposed as to where this industry can locate. My recommendation would be to look at the Leamington's Cannabis By- law to further strengthen what is being proposed. Leamington includes several details/definitions in their by-law that appears to try and cover loopholes that could arise if the by-law is challenged. I have included a few of those details below: • They identify that the municipality may prohibit and regulate with respect to public nuisances, including matters that, in the opinion of Council are or could become or cause public nuisances. • "Cannabis" shall have the same meaning as cannabis as defined in the Cannabis Act" • Cannabis-Related Activity-growing, process, extracting, packaging or otherwise making ready for sale, testing, destroying, storing, shipping, permitting consumption or sale of Cannabis or Cannabis Products. Thank you for your consideration Diane Cuzner, Gary Bell 19 Monica Crt (Sugarbush) Oro-Medonte LOK 1EO Page 175 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Ron <rmcclean@sympatico.ca> Sent: April 4, 2020 1:37 PM To: Cannabis <Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca>; Planning <Planning@oro-medonte.ca> Cc: Ron McClean <rmcclean@schulich.yorku.ca>; Mary Jane Sarjeant <mjsarjeant@sympatico.ca> Subject: Comments re: Cannabis Draft By-law Dear Mayor Hughes, Town Council and Oro-Medonte Planning Department: Our names are Ron McClean and Mary Jane Sarjeant and we have lived in Oro- Medonte for 26 years. Thank you for your efforts in making the required amendments to the cannabis by-law to ensure it would prohibit Cannabis, including Hemp, in all agricultural zones in Oro- Medonte. A crop that requires high fencing, security, and excessive water consumption, and disturbs residents' quality of life with a pervasive odour, excessive noise, and artificial lighting, does not belong on lands that are close to residential neighbourhoods, schools and recreational trails. It should be restricted to industrial lands. Thank you for your leadership on this issue. We support the amended cannabis by-law. Yours truly, Ron McClean and Mary Jane Sarjeant 2249 Ridge Road West Oro-Medonte ON LOL 21-0 Page 176 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Michael Higgins<MHiggins@mother-parkers.com> Sent:April 4, 2020 10:25 AM To: Michael Higgins<MHiggins@mother-parkers.com>; Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: New By-Law re Cannabis Farming Dear Sirs My name is Michael Higgins. I own land and have a house at 27 Windfields Drive West in Oro Medonte. I have had the opportunity to read the draft by-law which will be discussed and hopefully passed later this month. I am fully behind the townships decision to restrict marijuana crops to industrial zones. Due to the strong smell, excessive light pollution and heavy water use, every effort should be made to keep such crops away from other agricultural and community lands. Moreover, no marijuana grow should be allowed to affect the quality of our beloved Lake Simcoe. Yours sincerely, Michael Higgins 705-487-2744 647-244-5893 Page 177 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Sue Benjafield <sbenjafield@hotmail.com> Sent:April 3, 2020 5:34 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: cannabis by law Dear Oro Medonte Planning Department, Town Council and Mayor Hughes, My name is Sue Benjafield and I have lived in Oro Medonte all my life as a summer resident and now as a retired permanent resident. Thank you for your efforts in making the required amendments to the cannabis by-law to ensure it would prohibit Cannabis, including Hemp in all agriculture zones in Oro Medonte. Cannabis does not belong in the historical village of Shanty Bay and next to a school. Thank you for your leadership. I support the amended cannabis by-law. Yours truly, Sue Benjafield 267 Bay st., Oro Medonte L01 2 LO Page 178 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... April 4, 2020. Attention: Oro-Medonte Council and Planning Dept. Re: Cannibas Draft Zoning By-law Proposal To all concerned in this matter: I have done some additional research since my previous (March 31) letter to you regarding the Draft Cannabis By-law proposed for Council's consideration and public input on April 7th. I've reviewed the Selwyn Cannabis By-law Report (Sept. 2019) by Meridian Planning and had a brief conversation with its author, Nick MacDonald who also created the original Official Plan for Oro-Medonte. As a result, I strongly suggest that there is a more urgent and very important need to be addressed before Council approves the final version of the By-law. Specific policies must first be created within Oro-Medonte's OP to support the tighter restrictions proposed in that By-law. I expect, as you should, that this By-law will be challenged and proceed to a LPAT. If Council is genuinely interested in 'getting it right', you should consider Meridian (Nick MacDonald's) considerable experience in dealing with this issue for Selwyn, Caledon, and Pelham townships and retain him to determine what supportive (defendable) policies would be appropriate as amendments to Oro-Medonte's Official Plan. Or at the very least if OM's Planning Staff is directed to develop such policies, request a professional peer review from Mr. MacDonald. To pass the proposed By-law without doing this diligence could place the township at considerable risk and related legal expenses. So beyond this recommendation my question is - Will Council hire Nick MacDonald to consult on the By-law content and the necessary OP changes to make the By-law more effective? Best regards, AUa4,i/a i&L �3ake r 638 Horseshoe Valley Rd. E. Oro-Medonte, ON LOK 1E0 Page 179 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: MICHAEL AND MARIONS<michaelandmarions@rogers.com> Sent:April 4, 2020 8:27 AM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Stop the Cannnabis on line3. Dear Oro Medonte Council & Mayor. My family and I object in the strongest possible language to the proposed cannabis farm on line 3 @ the Ridge road. Kent Smith 1243 Line 3 south Oro Medonte 705 794 8007 Page 180 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From:Antra Kugler<antra@live.ca> Sent:April 3, 2020 8:33 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject:Zoning By-law Amendment 2019-ZBA-01 Cannabis Production and Processing Facilities Dear Mayor Hughes and Members of the Town Council of Oro-Medonte, We are residents of Shanty Bay and are writing in support of the proposed by-law amendments prohibiting the growth, production or processing of Cannabis and/or Hemp in any zones other than those already designated as ED or IR. We would oppose any rezoning of agricultural/rural lands to ED or IR in order to facilitate those operations. Over the past few months, we have watched with dismay developments on the farmland between Lines 2 and 3. We were horrified to see the clear cutting of trees in woodlots and along the property lines, many of them historic, old growth trees. We have seen trees ripped out of the ground by their roots and the land itself disturbed to such a degree that it will take years for it to recover, if at all. Now instead of a beautiful shady lane way on the Rail Trail between Lines 2 and 3, we see a wasteland. It's unbelievable that this was permitted adjacent to parkland that people come from miles around to enjoy and so close to homes, schools and playgrounds. There are no positive aspects to permitting Cannabis production facilities on agricultural lands, particularly those abutting residential areas. The potential for odor, light and sound pollution affecting the residents is tremendous and is already having a negative impact on property values in the area. Cannabis production is an industry that rightfully belongs in an industrial area. As the legalization of cannabis is still in its infancy, I urge the township administration and our elected officials to proceed with extreme caution in their consideration of where such operations are permitted or risk the possibility of many unforeseen consequences. Sincerely, Antra and Fritz Kugler 24 Red Oak Cres. LOL 2L0 Page 181 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: MICHAEL AND MARIONS<michaelandmarions@rogers.com> Sent:April 4, 2020 8:36 AM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Bylaw amendment/cannabis Dear Council &Mr. Mayor I would like to support the proposed amendments to the bylaw regarding the cannabis farms. Please add my name to the list of supporters of proposed changes to this bylaw. Kent Smith 1243 Line 3 South, Oro-Medonte 705 794 8007 Page 182 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Douglas Exel <archie02ca@icloud.com> Sent: April 4, 2020 8:52 AM To: Cannabis <Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Against cannabis growing Dear Oro- Medonte council, My name is Janet Exel and I live at 1328 Line 8 N, Oro- Medonte. Please note that my family is against cannabis growing in Oro. We live on a property with many acres. We have natural water running through our property which I believe would be harmful. We also live next to a working organic farm. We try to not harm our neighbors farm in any way possible because we know the waterways all connect in Oro. Please , let's do our part, preserve Oros waterways by voting against cannabis and hemp growing farms in Oro. Thank you, Janet Exel Page 183 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Bruce McCartney<balcaris@icloud.com> Sent:April 3, 2020 5:37 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: New By-Law re Cannabis Farming Dear Sirs I own land and have a house on Windfields Drive West in Oro Medonte. I have had the opportunity to read the draft by-law which will be discussed and hopefully passed later this month. I am fully behind the townships decision to restrict marijuana crops to industrial zones. Due to the strong smell, excessive light pollution and heavy water use, every effort should be made to keep such crops away from other agricultural and community lands. Moreover, no marijuana grow iOS should be allowed to affect the quality of our beloved Lake Simcoe. Yours sincerely, Bruce McCartney 416-602-7162 Page 184 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: D Banting<timeisawheel@hotmail.com> Sent:April 3, 2020 2:08 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject:Amendment to the Cannabis Zoning By-law To: Oro-Medonte Planning Department, Town Council and Mayor Hughes, We are Tom and Debi Banting and we have been residents of Shanty Bay, in Oro- Medonte 1-01-21-0, for over 28 years. We own a single family dwelling on Line 3 South. We have reviewed By-Law No. 2020 Draft, a By-law to Amend Zoning By-law 97-95 the amendment to the cannabis By-law . We are in favour of the amendment, however, does it need to indicate/include specifically the production of Hemp. ( reference Ontario moves to take hemp out of marijuana regulations, setting up Canadian hemp wave, published May 14, 20018) And. Lets be clear that we are still very concerned with what is happening at 918 Line 3 South. Back in October 2019 the person claiming to be the property manager at 918 Line 3 South said that they would be tearing down the barns, renovating the house to live in it, bringing in some Black Angus cattle to the existing paddock just south of the Residence, excavating two irrigation ponds and a deep well to operate as a Hemp Farm. Later with the removal of shrub and mature trees, a worker indicated this was all for a perimeter metal fence. They have obviously moved forward with the majority of these plans. So what exactly are they preparing this property for? Will the timing of the purchase and now preparation of the land be subject to the Amendment Zoning By-law 97-95? If so will the Owner/Operator(s) be in any position to pressure the municipality for a more favourable result. Or will it come to a day in court with MPAC ruling? How can we be assured that if the Owner/Operator (s) have overstepped to date that there are Regulations in place to obtain a conviction or fine for any offence? We are looking to this Elected Counsel to act with the utmost integrity, accountability and transparency. It is critical, in designing new By-laws and tools, that this Municipality have the strategies necessary to ENFORCE. Thankyou Tom and Debi Banting 921 Line 3 South Oro Medonte On 1-01-21-0 Page 185 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: lmng007@gmaii.com <imng007@gmail.com> Sent: April 3, 2020 8:27 AM To: Cannabis <Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Cc: Planning <Planning@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Re: Shanty Bay Cannabis Zoning To whom it may concern, As long-time residents in Oro, we were quite concerned and disturbed to learn that Council is considering a cannabis production site in Shanty Bay, or anywhere in Oro for that matter. This is not what our community is about, and is inclusive of the following reasons identified by other communities near a cannabis production site: - Added noise, smell and light pollution. - Security concerns given the nature of the product - Proximity to a local school - Waste and toxins - Increased truck traffic - Decline in real estate values We trust that Council and interested parties will take the time to carefully consider the value of being selective with zoning and property development here in Oro, and to be guided by community needs and not just economics. Respectfully, Ian and Cheryl Graham 29 Nordic Trail Oro-Medonte Page 186 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: BIGELOW <tebigelow@rogers.com> Sent: April 2, 2020 6:31 PM To: Cannabis <Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Support of amendment to Cannibus by law When I sent an earlier objection to this industry locating on agricultural land I neglected to in crude my address. I live at 115 Bay Street in Shanty Bay and have lived and treasured this township most of my life. Sincerely and adamently Ted Bigelow Page 187 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Warren Harris <warren.harris@sympatico.ca> Sent: April 2, 2020 7:37 PM To: Cannabis <Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Oro Medonte Hello, We are vehemently opposed to any cannabis or hemp facility being established on any agricultural lands within the Township or near any residential neighbourhood, school, church, recreational facility or playground. Of immediate concern to us is the work taking place at 918 Line 3 South in Shanty Bay. We have enjoyed living in this community for 30 years. Recent work and destruction that this company has completed on this property has us concerned for our homes value, the future quality of the water and our safety and security. This company has blatantly demonstrated it has no concern for area residents, after cutting and ripping out countless trees on their property, for which we can only assume is going to be replaced with an unsightly chain link fence. We ask all councillors to heed the concerns of Township residents and to act in the best interests of our communities. Sincerely, Warren & Mary Harris 10 Walnut Drive, Shanty Bay Page 188 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: David <dbsteel6@gmail.com> Sent:April 2, 2020 3:17 PM To: Planning<Planning@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Cannabis-Shanty Bay To Whom It May Concern The production of cannabis has, as a direct side effect, the production of odour and light. These appear to be the major issues with this industry affecting communities in which they operate. The Leviathan Cannabis Group has made an application to the town of Pelham to build a new sealed greenhouse with full shading, to contain both odour and light. The company says they should not be included with "earlier generation facilities", (Financial Post- Jan. 2019). If in fact new generation production methods exist or are available, this should be the benchmark for any facility in Oro-Medonte. David and Barbara Steel 33 Highland Dr. Oro-Medonte, Ont. LOL 2LO Page 189 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Murray McGinnis <mjmcg47@gmail.com> Sent: April 2, 2020 12:39 PM To: Cannabis <Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Cc: Planning <Planning@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Draft Bylaw There are lots of locations to build industrial buildings without need to put them in residential/agricultural areas. The Township Council should pass the draft bylaw into law as soon as possible restricting such uses to strictly industrial areas. And in the meantime, withhold building permits for the site. Murray and Dawn McGinnis 14 Chestnut Lane Oro-Medonte, LOL 21-0 Page 190 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Wendy Powell <playagran@gmail.com> Sent:April 2, 2020 1:27 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Cannabis Production and Processing Facilities Draft by-law Subject: Cannabis Production and Processing Facilities Draft by-law Oro-Medonte Planning Dept, Mayor Hughes and Town Council Thank you for your efforts in supporting an amendment to limit cannabis growing to industrial and economic development areas. We have lived in this area for over fifteen years and are in full support in restricting the growing, production and processing facilities of cannabis and hemp to economic development and industrial areas. In reviewing the staff report illustrating areas of ED an IR lands it shows several high residential areas so I would like to add a special provision that this also be subject to a minimum of 2 km radius of a residential area. A crop that requires high fencing,security, odours etc does not belong in areas that are close to residential settings. In respect to Line 3 where the rumoured facility is to be opened there is still ongoing work occurring and the question still comes up as to whether it is possible to stop this. It appears that they are taking advantage of the current health issues and are disregarding any stop work orders. The question is can they continue and just slip through the process? In regards to trees that were removed on township properties can they be ordered to replant large trees? Thank you for your support of this amendment to the bylaw. Kent and Wendy Powell 66 Red Oak Cres Oro-Medonte Page 191 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Lawrence Crook <lawrencecrook@gmail.com> Sent: April 2, 2020 12:34 PM To: Cannabis <Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Cannibas By-law Attention Oro Medonte Planning and Council, I am writing in support of the new draft by-law regarding cannabis and the proposed zoning. In my opinion this should have been done before this company has been allowed to start construction of a 246 acre grow up right next to the town of Shanty Bay. There should have been a public notice also posted on the property. Any industry that requires 100s of acres of extensive high fencing and security details does not belong on an agricultural plot of land and much less within a community that has families with children walking the streets. Limiting the areas in which this type of industry can settle will enable the township to protect its residents and control/monitor a relatively new industry and learn over time the outcomes. Council only needs to look throughout southern Ontario and the problems other communities are experiencing that have not put in strict controls. Council has one chance to get this right and they should air on the side of caution and stand firm when challenged. The cannabis industry is so new there is little reliable information available on how to control odours, light, water consumption, pesticide use and waste water. By controlling the location of these types of facilities the township will be able to better monitor activities. This saves money in staff time as problems will be isolated to specific areas and not throughout the township and near significant settlement areas. The township will be able to better protect water resources when isolating this type of use and ensure run off and waste water are being properly tended to. We hope that council recognizes the strength in this draft by-law being put forward and support it fully and protects the future and immediate needs of Oro-Medonte. Sincerely concerned, Lawrence Crook 1180 Line 2 South Shanty Bay, ON LOL 21-0 Page 192 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: GENEVIEVE BLAIS <gblais330@yahoo.ca> Sent: April 2, 2020 12:16 PM To: Cannabis <Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca>; Planning <Planning@oro-medonte.ca> Cc: hvPOA Contact <hvpoacontact@g mail.com> Subject: Good day, I read your draft zoning by-law. 150m set back only? I would not like to have any plant, factory, smell, noise, traffic or any visual disturbance for production from a cannabis production from my property. Let's keep our township nice and quiet. No to cannabis production in Oro-Medonte, period. Genevieve Blais 5 Dale crt Oro-Medonte, On. Page 193 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... Gootlmorning. ...., ...., ...., ...., ...., ...., ...., ...., ...., ...., ...., ...., ...., ...., ...., Any way you can assist ms to convert this screensM1ot into a ptlf that wdl print in it's sn-y'1 Thanksl T Teresa Falconi Development Services Nssistant TarvnsM1lp of Oro-Merlonre T1,emeJ gnared fmm vu d otOmMedantes alsystem lees asap ape Ipdgmep doaWon wM1er 4N Inge�schment.0 rkingln s rs1-1h,to 111,—1. 6,66AM Thu Apr 2 < r „ f C,ancel Line 2/3 grow op Marijuana i5 (F� In vccr�;ar:r�7i, Gkrc n'ir.cf+„nie.c,ta �-��.� "" 14 <<r,jod Line 2/3 grow op Marijuana Please can you pass this e mail on to the Mayer of CJro Medonte. Please do not let this grow op happen this is a beautiful village with families,elderly people,a school,a community,and people's greed to make money is ruining it,have you driven up line 2 and seen all the trees gone? Would you personally like it in your back yard or as your ' A/ neighbour? I don't think so if you were truly honest. If this gets the go ahead I would � think that you would not be able to sleep at night knowing that this small community have this in their garden,the people who own the land don't live in this village,I understand that people's greed to make money makes them hard and not care about others but why can't this be grown in open spaces away from a village?There are lots of p/ places to grow this please don't let it be in our beautiful little village. I cannot come to your meeting due to the pandemic so this is my voice from a mother who loves this tiny village and it's community do the right thing and stop this for our village. Many thanks. Mrs Lesley Platt Sent from my Mad xm uom rry rTaa Page 194 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Haggerty<thehaggertys@sympatico.ca> Sent:April 2, 2020 11:15 AM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Cc: Planning<Planning@oro-medonte.ca>; Veitch, Ian <ian.veitch@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Pending by-law change ro growing cannabis To: Mayor, Deputy Mayor and Councilors Based on my limited knowledge of the situation that I have gleaned from the Horseshoe Valley Property Owners E-news, I wish to support the township's pending amendment that would limit the areas for cannabis growing and processing to selected industrial zoned properties. Thank you for considering my preferences. Jack Haggerty 49 Fairway Court, Oro-Medonte LOL 2L0 Page 195 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Melinda's Email <m.nelson 07@ bell.net> Sent: April 2, 2020 9:57 AM To: Cannabis <Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Grow operations To Oro Medonte: Just to begin I have lived in this community for over 6 years so to some I might be a newbie. We love the rual community with farms and small subdivisions scattered throughout the area. I am shocked that we are just learning of this potential grow operation for cannabis so close to a residential community and a lake that we all enjoy and want to keep heathy. My concern is not the social or media issue that might come up it is the following items: 1) environmental 2) air conditions and quality 3) security 1)Environmentally We don't know the effects of how this might affect our water tables as Canadians have not had large grown ops for long and certainly not close to a water table and lake like this. Taking down tree and clearing the land has anyone review erosion effects? 2) Air Quality and conditions Let's face it marijuana smells strong ... even in plant form it has a very strong and pungent smell that permeates. It's is very difficult to get rid of that smell. How will this affect resident that can not handle the smell. The price of their houses will also be affects as no one will want to live there smelling marijuana all day. How will it affect those really close? Lee in mind this is not just a one time exposure this is exposure over weeks, months and years. Could they test positive and potentially lose their jobs if they have mandatory testing. 3) Security How will the company be able to keep the community safe from those that would like to steal from this operation bring these undesirable actions into a community that history has very low theft and vandalism. How safe are you walking your dog in those changed circumstances? Would you move your family there? Page 196 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... I beg you to please stop this until further investigation can be made and addressed. There are so many other remote places that can handle this type of operation without affecting and infecting an entire community. I look forward to your favourable response. Melinda Nelson Resident of Oro Medonte Page 197 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From:tvcrooks tvcrooks<tvcrooks@sympatico.ca> Sent:April 1, 2020 5:29 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca>; Planning<Planning@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Fwd:the Cannabis by law Subject: the Cannabis by law Dear Oro -Medonte Planning department, Town Council and Mayor Hughes My name is Rosaleen Crooks and my family have been residents of Shanty Bay for generations. I want to thank you for your efforts in making the required amendments ensuring it would prohibit Cannabis, including Hemp in all agricultural zones in Oro-Medonte. A crop that requires high fencing, security, water consumption, and disturbance to residents quality of life with a pervasive odour with excessive noise and artificial lighting does not belong on lands that are close to residential settings.We campaigned for the Lake Simcoe Protection Plan and there should be no waste and toxins allowed that would eventually seep into our beautiful Lake. There are nursery schools, daycares and subdivisions that abut the land presently in question. It would markedly impact the quality of life, and the real estate value of the homes in this area. Cannabis plants should only be allowed on industrial settings and not anywhere close to residential settings. I want to thank you for the Council's leadership in the matter and I fully support the amendment to the Cannabis By Law. Yours sincerely Rosaleen Crooks 133 Bay St Shanty Bay Oro - Medonte LOL 2L0 Page 198 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From:Ann Truyens<at@iglide.net> Sent:April 1, 2020 2:17 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Cc: Planning<Planning@oro-medonte.ca>; . Council <Council@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Re Cannabis Draft By-law Importance: High To Oro-Medonte Planning Department & Township Council, This is to inform you that I fully support the proposed amendment to By-law No. 2020, A By-law to Amend Zoning By-law 97-95, as amended (Cannabis Production and Processing Facilities) which will restrict the growing of Cannabis in Oro-Medonte Township to Industrial Lands. Thank you for listening to the township residents in your efforts to making the required amendments to the Cannabis By-law to ensure that it will prohibit the growing and production of Cannabis in all agricultural zones in Oro-Medonte. A crop that requires: - high security fencing disturbing the movement of wildlife - uses excessive water consumption and produces waste and toxins flowing into Lake Simcoe - produces air quality concerns from the smell of Cannabis production, and increased traffic of large vehicles - is in close proximity to churches, schools, nursery schools and daycares, the nature walking trail, baseball diamonds and community parks - and most of all subdivisions, personal homes and summer cottages - disturbs residents' quality of life with a pervasive odour, excessive noise, and artificial lighting - and causes a decline in real estate value does not belong on lands that are close to residential settings. It belongs on Industrial zoned lands. Page 199 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... I support the amended Cannabis By-law, but the township must immediately place a `Stop Work Order' on the property at 918 Line 3 South to stop any further construction and site alteration in violation of the Oro-Medonte Site Alteration By-law. Sincerely, Ann Truyens 1352 Old Barrie Road West Oro-Medonte, ON LOL 2LO Page 200 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Debbie palmer<debbiepalmer_98@hotmail.com> Sent:April 1, 2020 12:01 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Cc: Planning<Planning@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Cannibis draft Dear members of council I have concerns regarding the proposed location of a cannibis production facility in Shanty Bay and other possible future locations in our area. While cannibis is legal and the benefits both the the user and the producer and even the local economy are measurable, the actual grow operation plant does present concerns for residents including possible smell, security and increased traffic. It is important that facilities be located in areas that are appropriate for production; a designated industrial type area. I want to ensure council's proposed by-law is retro-active in terms of being able to direct such production facilities to areas away from residents. Thank you for your consideration Debbie Palmer 14 Highland Dr 705 835 2228 Page 201 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Wendy Powell <playagran@gmail.com> Sent: April 1, 2020 11:22 AM To: cannabis@oro.medonte.ca; Planning <Planning@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Cannabis Production and Processing Facilities Drat by-law Oro-Medonte Planning Dept, Mayor Hughes and Town Council Thank you for your efforts in supporting an amendment to limit cannabis growing to industrial and economic development areas. We have lived in this area for over fifteen years and are in full support in restricting the growing, production and processing facilities of cannabis and hemp to economic development and industrial areas. In reviewing the staff report illustrating areas of ED an IR lands it shows several high residential areas so I would like to add a special provision that this also be subject to a minimum of 2 km radius of a residential area. A crop that requires high fencing,security, odours etc does not belong in areas that are close to residential settings. In respect to Line 3 where the rumoured facility is to be opened there is still ongoing work occurring and the question still comes up as to whether it is possible to stop this. It appears that they are taking advantage of the current health issues and are disregarding any stop work orders. The question is can they continue and just slip through the process? In regards to trees that were removed on township properties can they be ordered to replant large trees? Thank you for your support of this amendment to the bylaw. Kent and Wendy Powell 66 Red Oak Cres Oro-Medonte Page 202 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From:Tom Kurtz<tom.kurtz@sympatico.ca> Sent:April 1, 2020 9:48 AM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Cc: . Council <Council@oro-medonte.ca> Subject:Zoning By-law Amendment 2019-ZBA-01 Cannabis Production and Processing Facilities You have presented information on : "Areas already zoned Economic Development(ED) and Rural Industrial (IR) that may permit Cannabis Production and Processing Facilities." and you have ruled out those that do not meet the minimum lot size standard. It would be helpful to the public if you could identify those sites that may also be ruled out, either in whole or in part,based on all the standards and particularly the 150 metre setback standard. Tom Page 203 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo From: Ian Woods<ian@misterwaterfront.com> Sent:April 1, 2020 11:00 AM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Cc: Planning<Planning@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: STOP the Desecration of the Village of Shanty Bay! Dear Oro Medonte Planning Department, Town Council, and Mayor Hughes, My name is Ian Woods and I have lived in Oro-Medonte for 57 years since 1963 when my father built our cottage at 2773 Ridge Road West. A few months ago, I was shocked to hear that there were plans for the building of a huge 200+acre cannabis production operation on Line 2 just north of where/(and many others)live.And, I was flabbergasted by the removal of a//the beautiful trees along Line 2 to make way for an ugly(barbed-wire?)fence. This will RUIN he beauty of our little village. by on earth would you ever consider putting this type of operation so close to our village! I can't believe that all the residents of Shanty Bay were not consulted on these plans BEFORE the first phase of building this huge cannabis production form started. I sure hope that it's not too late to stop it! I hear that you are making some amendments to the planning act to prevent cannabis being grown in agricultural areas such as right beside the settlement area of Shanty Bay Village. But I'm worried that the township has already made an agreement with the wealthy owner of the cannibals production company to go ahead, despite this. (As happened with Burl's Creek.) I sure hope not! By now, I'm sure you know all the reasons why we, the awakened citizens of Shanty Bay, oppose this crop being grown here. I shall reiterate them: "A crop that requires high fencing, security, excessive water consumption and disturbs residents'quality of life with a pervasive odour, excessive noise, and artificial lighting, does not belong on lands that are close to residential settings. It belongs in an industrial land." I implore you to please reconsider this proposal and nip it in the bud! I support the amended cannabis by-low on one condition... that it prevents any further development of any cannabis production operation from being anywhere near Shanty Bay or,for that matter, Lake Simcoe. Page 204 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo Sincerely, Ian Woods 13 Melissa Crescent Oro-Medonte, ON LOL 21.0 705-720-6500 My God!... What were you thinking?That economics trumps quality of life? Page 205 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Danielle Park<danielle@venablepark.com> Sent: March 31, 2020 4:01 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca>; Planning<Planning@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Comments re: Cannabis Draft By-law Dear Oro Medonte Planning Department, Town Council, and Mayor Hughes, My name is Danielle Park and I have lived in Oro—Medonte for 20 years. Thank you for your efforts in making the required amendments to the cannabis by-law to ensure it would prohibit Cannabis, including Hemp, in all agriculture zones in Oro-Medonte. A crop that requires high fencing, security, excessive water consumption and disturbs residents' quality of life with a pervasive odour; excessive noise, and artificial lighting, does not belong on lands that are close to residential settings. It belongs in an industrial land. Thank you for your leadership. I support the amended cannabis by-law. Sincerely, Danielle Park Danielle Park, CFA, LLB President, Portfolio Manager Venable Park Investment Counsel Inc. www.venablepark.com Page 206 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Teresa Snelgrove <teresa.snelgrove@gmail.com> Sent: March 31, 2020 3:32 PM To: Cannabis <Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Cc: Planning <Planning@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Cannabis plant To Whom it May Concern, I am appalled by this initiative, and think it is extremely undesirable for all the reasons being discussed. I have been a resident of Shanty Bay on and off for 74 years and have seen many changes but this is deplorable. I think it especially disrespectful to our community to move ahead with this during the pandemic when voices can not be heard in person. Regards, Teresa Snelgrove 1700 5/6 Sideroad Oro-Medonte 1-01-21_0 Page 207 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Len Watson <Iwatson4778@gmail.com> Sent: March 31, 2020 2:15 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca>; Planning<Planning@oro-medonte.ca> Subject:Amendment to the Existing Cannabis Production By-Law Our names are Janet and Len Watson and we reside at 26 Landscape Drive. We are submitting this email as our support for the proposed amendments to the current Cannabis Production By- Law. Cannabis grow ops cannot be allowed to exist in close proximity to farm/agricultural land, residential areas nor any area that has schools, churches, parks, walking trails, and commercial retail businesses. We urge Council to pass the proposed amendments as they exist in the draft By-Law on this day, March 31, 2020. Thank you. Page 208 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Laurie Lewington <Ialewington@gmail.com> Sent: March 31, 2020 1:55 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: My opinion is this not the right location for this at all. We are a family neighbourhood. We have enough problems without increasing traffic on our streets. I am most definitely against this development, it should be built in Bartle where they would benefit from more traffic. Regards, Laurie Lewi ton (705) 23 -74 3 21 Landscape Dr. Oro Medonte, L,OL 2L O Page 209 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Natacha Norman <nat.norman@yahoo.ca> Sent: March 31, 2020 1:42 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca>; Planning<Planning@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Comments re: Cannabis Draft By-Law Dear OroMedonte Planning Department, Town Council, and Mayor Hughes, My Name is Natacha Norman, I have been a resident of Oro-Medonte since 2005 and my Husband Brad has been a resident since 1973. We really appreciate your efforts in making the required amendments to the Cannabis by-law to prohibit Cannabis, including hemp, in all agriculture zones in Oro-Medonte. This crop does not belong anywhere near residential (both permanent and cottage) homes, schools, recreational trails, churches, parks or anywhere else our township residents congregate. This crop belongs on industrial land only, a great distance away from any of the above-mentioned areas. We know that this crop requires high fencing which disturbs natural travel patterns for wildlife, excessive noise from generators, light pollution, and offensive and pervasive odors. This crop also uses excessive water consumption, fertilizer, toxins, and pesticides that could affect the safety of private wells and waterways! The extra security and surveillance required for such a property, constant truck traffic and decline of property values are also concerning issues. Thank you for time and leadership.We support the amended Cannabis by-law. Sincerely, Natacha and Brad Norman 1731 Ridge Rd West Oro-Medonte, On LOL2LO Page 210 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Johnnie@kelsall.ca <johnnie@kelsall.ca> Sent: March 31, 2020 2:18 PM To: Cannabis <Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Cc: Planning <Planning@oro-medonte.ca>; Horseshoe Owners Association <hvpoacontact@gmail.com> Subject: Cannabis Grow Operation Dear Council members of Oro-Medonte. I am a long term resident of Oro-Medonte having moved to the Highlands of Horseshoe in Feb 1998 at 29 Bridle Path Oro-Medonte 1-01210. I am also a retired OPP officer having served for 33 yrs retiring in 2018. 1 wish to voice my concern over the proposed Cannabis Grow Op to be located in Oro- Medonte. This is something that should not be allowed in Oro for public health, security reasons(believe me this will be a big concern) and enjoyment of the beauty of Oro- Medonte. Please do not go down this route for Oro-Medonte. This will be a short term gain for long term pain. Oro-Medonte is better than this and will be like the experience of other municipalities that regretted the allowance of grow ops in their communities- much like the wind turbine introduction to beautiful communities and the resulting negatives of such an initiative. A concerned resident of the Highlands of Horseshoe John W Kelsall Page 211 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... 638 Horseshoe Valley Rd. E. Oro-Medonte, ON LOK 1EO March 31, 2020. Attention: Oro-Medonte Council and Planning Dept. Re: Cannabis Draft Zoning By-law Amendment. To all concerned in this matter: We would like to indicate our support for the general principles proposed in the Cannabis Draft Zoning By-law being considered for approval by Council on April 7th. However, we believe that the By-law should include more specific provisions rather than adding conditions to each proposal through individual Site Controls. Through your experience with existing cannabis facilities within the township you are well aware that there are several common issues that residents have expressed serious concerns about and which you can anticipate arising with each proposal that comes before you in the future. We suggest the following for your consideration and properly worded inclusion in the By-law: 1) Safe and appropriate distancing of the proposed facility from individual residences and subdivisions, schools, and other public facilities such as parks, playgrounds, churches, halls, etc. 2) Sufficient ventilation capacity to control, and distancing from the above,to prevent the smell of the cannabis production from contaminating the surrounding air quality. 3) The provision of an adequate and permanent hydro source and prohibition of large outdoor generators which unnecessarily create high noise levels. 4) To avoid disturbing the surrounding area, strict limitations on the exterior lighting levels and the hours of their operation related to security of the facility. 5) Prevention of the unnecessary and unreasonable removal of trees on the property in compliance with the County Tree Cutting By-laws. The above suggestions are not intended to be all inclusive or necessarily listed by priority, but are deserving of both your consideration and provisions made for in the Cannabis By-law under review. Thank you for this opportunity to contribute with the best interests of township residents in mind. Best regards, A Ua.w a*i&L"id a,3a k" Page 212 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... arch 30, 2020 � a.M John And Tassia Bell MAR 3 1 2f120 a 143 a street u�'0-,M�r�;sr�TE y c ,xr � rr Oro-Me onte, Ont To whom it may concern, We are writing this letter to express our full support of the proposed zoning bylaw 97-95, to permit cannabis production and processing facilities within the Township of tiro- edonte in the following. zones: 1 . Rural Industrial ( IFS 2. Economic Development ( E Additionally we would like to thank the Mayor, the Council Members and the Planning Staff for providing a comprehensive and thoughtful pathway to this difficult and uncharted issue that the residents ofOro- edonte are presently faced with. Yours truly, John & Tassia Bell Page 213 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From:JULIE NEWBURN <newburnjulie@rogers.com> Sent: March 31, 2020 12:19 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Draft Cannabis By-Law Subject: Draft Cannabis By-Law Dear Oro-Medonte Staff and Council I have been a resident of Oro-Medonte for most of my life and I want to preserve what makes this township special including it's agricultural lands and picturesque communities. I have reviewed the draft by-law and I commend you for your efforts to prohibit Cannabis in all agricultural zones in Oro-Medonte. Any industry that requires extensive fencing with significant height and security measures is not traditional agriculture and will ruin the landscape of this beautiful township. Cannabis is used for medical and industrial uses and therefore should be on the appropriate zoned lands. One can find agricultural land next too settlement areas throughout Oro-Medonte and by not allowing cannabis to be grown adjacent to sensitive areas you are protecting peoples homes, their personal investments and their families. You have my full support for this new by-law. Julie Newburn 1086 Line 2 S Oro-Medonte, ON LOL 2LO Page 214 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: srcryer@outlook.com <srcryer@outlook.com> Sent: March 31, 2020 11:14 AM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Subject: Draft Cannabis By-Law Dear Oro-Medonte Planning and Council: We are writing in support of the new draft by-law regarding cannabis. We are particularly concerned about the activity going on between the 2nd and 3rd lines of Oro- Medonte. We believe that the proximity to both the community of Shanty Bay and Lake Simcoe could be very problematic for all concerned. We feel strongly that a new industry to Canada, such as cannabis should be limited to areas that are zoned for industrial use. The cannabis industry is so new that there is little reliable information available on how to control odours, light, water consumption, pesticide use and waste water. By controlling the location of these types of facilities the township will be able to protect its citizens and its communities from an industry that is wreaking havoc across Canada as townships try to grapple with how to control such an invasive industry(refer to Holland Landing or Pelham Ontario). You have our full support for this new by-law. Sheila and John Cryer 9 Palm Beach Road Oro-Medonte, ON LOL 1TO Page 215 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: randy forbes <randy.forbez@icloud.com> Sent: March 31, 2020 9:28 AM To: cannabis@oro-medonte.ca. Cc: Planning <Planning@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Comments re: Cannabis Draft By-law Dear Oro Medonte Planning Department, Town Council, and Mayor Hughes My name is Randy Forbes and I have lived in Oro-Medonte for seventy one years. Thank you for your efforts in making the required amendments to the cannabis by-law to ensure it would prohibit Cannabis, including Hemp, in all agricultural zones in Oro- Medonte. A crop that requires high fencing, security, excessive water consumption and disturbs residents' quality of life with a pervasive odour, excessive noise, and artificial lighting, does not belong on lands that are close to residential settings. It belongs in an industrial land. Thank you for your leadership. I support the amended cannabis by-law. Sincerely, Randy Forbes 1832 Ridge Road West Shanty Bay Oro-Medonte Page 216 of 327 3.a\ 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment fnthe Zn... From: Lynnette Eisen <|ynnette.eisen@rugero.com> Sent: March 3O' 20204:]] PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@uro'rnedunteza> Cc: Planning<P|annin0@oro'rnedunte.ca> Subject: New Cannabis ByLaw Dear Oro K8ednDte Planning Department, Town Council, and Mayor Hughes, My name isLyDDette Eisen and | live at112 Bay Street, iD Oro —y0ed0Dte. | h@ve lived inOro+K8edonte for 29years. | aOO writing tm thank you and support the suggested new bylaw which t0Oly understanding will ensure that marijuana and hemp operations will be restricted to Industrial and Economic lands in Oro yNedonte. | am extremely concerned with the activity occurring at the property off the rail trail between the 2"u and 3m lines which strongly suggests an application from the owners will be forthcoming. Marijuana and hemp operations which include processing facilities are far different than other crops. The concerns with respect tooclVuno. noise, excessive light in the eveningo, regular large truck traffic and water oonaumpUon, to name efevv. will negatively impact the Shanty Bay community in a significant fashion, altering the quiet character of this rural settlement and potentially the health of its residents. Neither the residents of Shanty Boy nor any other community in Oro-Medonto should have to put up with a manufacturing plant right next dour. | would ask that the bylaw be clear that both marijuana and hemp are restricted to Industrial and Economic lands. | wish to thank the Council for both listening to and acting upon residents concerns in supporting the proposed bylaw. Kind regards, LynUette Eisen Sales Representative Forest Hill Real Estate Inc. Brokerage Cell: 7O50270118 Office: 7O5484O8O8 Email: Page 217Of327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Sarah Ross <sarah76@rogers.com> Sent: March 30, 2020 7:04 PM To: Cannabis <Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Draft Cannabis By-Law Dear Oro Medonte Planning and Council I am writing in support of the new draft by-law regarding cannabis. I feel strongly that a new industry to Canada such as cannabis should be zoned to areas that are intended for industrial use. The cannabis industry is so new there is little reliable information available on how to control odours, light, water consumption, pesticide use and waste water. By controlling the location of these types of facilities the township will be able to protect its citizens and its communities from an industry that is wreaking havoc across Canada as townships try to grapple with how to control such a invasive industry (refer to Holland Landings or Pelham Ontario). You have our full support for this new by-law. Sarah Ross 70 Red Oak Cres Oro Medonte LOL 21-0 Page 218 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Paul Burton <p.burton@rogers.com> Sent: March 30, 2020 8:51 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Comments re: Cannabis Draft By-law Dear Oro Medonte Planning Department, Town Council, and Mayor Hughes, Our names are Paul and Christine Burton and we have lived in Oro—Medonte for 9 years and east Barrie far 26 years before that. Thank you for your of arts in making the required amendments to the cannabis by-law to ensure it would prohibit Cannabis, including Hemp, in all agriculture zones in Ora-Medonte. A crop that requires high fencing, security, excessive water consumption and disturbs residents'quality of life with a pervasive odour; excessive noise, and artificial lighting, does not belong on lands that are close to residential settings. It belongs in an industrial land. Thank you for your leadership. I support the amended cannabis by-law. Sincerely, Paul and Christine Burton Page 219 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Mitch Eisen <eisen@celaw.ca> Sent: March 30, 2020 3:41 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca>; Planning<Planning@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: New Cannabis By Law Hello: My name is Mitchell Eisen. I reside at 112 Bay Street, Oro Medonte. I am writing to advise of my support for the suggested new bylaw which to my understanding will ensure that marijuana and hemp operations will be restricted to Industrial and Economic lands in Oro Medonte. I am gravely concerned with the activity occurring at the property off the rail trail between the 2nd and 3rd lines which strongly suggests an application from the owners will be forthcoming. Marijuana and hemp operations which include processing facilities are far different than other crops. The concerns re odours, noise, excessive light in the evenings, regular large truck traffic and water consumption, to name a few, will badly impact the shanty bay community in a significant fashion, altering the quiet character of this rural settlement. Neither the residents of Shanty Bay nor any other community in Oro-Medonte should have to put up with a manufacturing plant right next door. I would ask that the bylaw be clear that both marijuana and hemp are restricted to Industrial and Economic lands. I wish to thank the Council for both listening to and acting upon residents concerns in supporting the proposed bylaw. Mitchell Eisen Page 220 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... HMH LAW OFFICES NE M. AS J.HILL,B A LL B SUSANNE M.HAYWARD,BA.,LL.B MARK D.W.WEIR,B.A.,J.D. BARRISTERS & SOLICITORS EDWARDP.MAYHEW,LL.B (ret) D.T.A.HOGBEN(1939.2001) III TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE 148 LINE 7 SOUTH ORO-MEDONTE, ONTARIO LOL 2EO March 30, 2020. To all Members of Counsel and parties concerned: Re: Cannabis Processing My thanks, first, for your continuing efforts to keep all interested parties informed as to developments regarding this matter. I was pleased to receive information confirming that Cannabis production will be restricted to IR zoneing and will be required to be at least 150 meters from and existing residential structure. My concerns are that this setback is insufficient when considering the noise, air and light pollution, which will result from such production, and the security issues. Significant secure fencing or similar located only 500 feet from a residence will impact use and value. As well, the defining point from which any such setback is calculated should be the edge of the property containing the residential use and not the actual building. This may not be considered a major concern when dealing with Industrially zoned property but does give rise to the greater concern. Any land owner may apply for an amendment to the Official Plan altering the existing zoneing of any property to meet the IR zone requirement. Then, the current zoneing of AR or similar may not protect residents as Counsel will be required to consider any such application. If professional planners present the appropriate material, any such application may be successful. The 150 meter setback then could allow such production, legally, very close to villages and hamlets, and therefore, the schools and business located there. I would suggest that the setback minimum be established at significantly more than 150 meters, but, more importantly, I would like a clear indication of the Township's priorities, standards, considerations and guidelines to be applied and adhered to during any future Official Plan Amendment Application to alter existing Zoneing designtions. I am given to understand that a rural/agricultural bias has tempered all such considerations previously. I am fully aware that Cannabis Production will be a very lucrative business with positive impact on the economy and tax base for the Township. As such businesses involve huge financial input A Division of Douglas John Hill Professional Corporation 39 OWEN STREET,BARRIE,ONTARIO L4M 3G9 TELEPHONE:(705)726-3712-FAX(705)726-3895 1_iti[_ I_I_%n l'o a;hmltlaw O o 9� 221 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... - 2 - by parties very able to funds amendment applications and appeals, I strongly urge that the Township finalize requiremetns regarding locating such businesses in Industrial zones only and confirming that alteration to exiting zoneing designations will be very difficult to obtain. This new business should be embraced, but very cautiously. Yours Truly - "- HMH LAWF E Per: D ill 4 Page 222 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: BIGELOW <tebigelow@rogers.com> Sent: March 30, 2020 2:22 PM To: Cannabis <Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Cc: Planning <Planning@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Cannabis restricted to industrial land I wish to add my voice to support the amendment to the above by law. Grow ops are an industry- not an agriculture. Ted Bigelow Page 223 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo From: Martha Billes<tirelady@ctire.com> Sent: March 30, 2020 12:08 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca>; Planning<Planning@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Cannabis draft by-law Chez Billes 151111547 Ridge Road West, Shanty Bay, Oro-Medonte, LOL 2L March 30, 2020. Cannabis Draft By-law Atterntion: Oro Medonte Planning Department, Town Council, and Mayor Hughes, Dear Sirs: My FA ILA NOW MYSELF HAV E BEEN OWNERS OF THIS PROPERTY SINCE 193T IT IS A RELIEF TO SEE THE DRAFT BYLA W amendments to the cannabis by-law which will hopefully ensure the prohibition of genus Cannabis, including Hemp, in all agriculture zones in Oro-Medonte. Such intense measures involved in cannabis/hemp production belongs only in industrial lands not anywhere near residential or recreational land. I am in support of the draft by-law as I have seen it and further I would support additions designed to enhance the protection of our residential community. Thank you for your leadership. Sincerely, Martha G Billes,LLD Chancellor, University of Guelph Post script. I share the following concerns with fellow residents: • Disturbance to wildlife due to fencing, lighting to grow crops, noise from generator • Waste and toxins flowing in to Lake Simcoe Page 224 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... • Proximity to churches, schools, nursery schools and daycares, the nature walking trail, baseball diamonds and community parks and most of all subdivisions, personal homes and summer cottages • Air quality from the smell of hemp and cannabis production • Security requirements • Increased traffic of large vehicles • Decline in real estate value ..................................MG Bllles Page 225 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo From: Kevin Bradley<Kevin.Bradley@ ba rrie.ca> Sent: March 30, 2020 8:21 AM To: Planning<Planning@oro-medonte.ca> Cc: Kevin Bradley, (brad leyk@sympatico.ca)<brad leyk@sym patico.ca>; Patty Bradley (Patty.Brad I ey@ Georgia nCo I lege.ca) <Patty.Brad ley@Georgia nCol lege.ca> Subject: RE: Comments re: Cannabis Draft By-law Dear Oro-Medonte Planning Department, Town Council, and Mayor Hughes, My name is Kevin Bradley and I have lived at 23 Martine Crescent in Shanty Bay for 8 years. My family made the deliberate decision to relocate to Shanty Bay for its rustic charm, quiet feel, and high public safety. Any industrial operation, which cannabis production clearly is, in any proximity to the settlement would force us to revisit that decision and to search for another community for our family to live in. Therefore, I applaud your efforts in making the required amendments to the cannabis by- law to ensure it would prohibit Cannabis, including Hemp, in all agriculture zones in Oro-Medonte. A crop that requires high fencing, security, excessive water consumption and disturbs residents' quality of life with a pervasive odour, excessive noise, and artificial lighting, does not belong on lands that are close to residential settings. It belongs in an industrial land. Thank you for your leadership. I support the amended cannabis by-law. Sincerely, Kevin Bradley 23 Martine Crescent Shanty Bay, ON LOL 21-0 705-737-0302 Page 226 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo From:Y B<ybreg@outlook.com> Sent: March 27, 2020 7:27 PM To: Planning<Planning@oro-medonte.ca> Subject:Amended Cannabis by-law Dear Oro Medonte Planning Department, Town Council, and Mayor Hughes, My name is Yvonne Breg and I lived in Shanty Bay for 33 years and still have a cottage in the area. Thank you for your efforts in making the required amendments to the cannabis by-law to ensure it would prohibit Cannabis, including Hemp, in all agriculture zones in Oro- Medonte. A crop that requires high fencing, security, excessive water consumption and disturbs residents'quality of life with a pervasive odour, excessive noise, and artificial lighting, does not belong on lands that are close to residential settings. It belongs in an industrial land. Thank you for your leadership. I support the amended cannabis by-low. Sincerely, Yvonne Breg Page 227 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: HASTINGS, KELLY<Kelly.Hastings@bmo.com> Sent: March 30, 2020 8:49 AM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Cannabis Draft By-law Dear Oro Medonte Planning Department,Town Council, and Mayor Hughes, My name is Rusty Hastings and I have lived in Oro—Medonte for 54 years. Thank you for your efforts in making the required amendments to the cannabis by-law to ensure it would prohibit Cannabis, including Hemp, in all agriculture zones in Oro-Medonte. A crop that requires high fencing, security, excessive water consumption and disturbs residents' quality of life with a pervasive odour, excessive noise, and artificial lighting, does not belong on lands that are close to residential settings. It belongs in an industrial land. Thank you for your leadership. I support the amended cannabis by-law. Sincerely, Rusty Hastings Kelly Hastings UP I Branch Manager I Mapleview Branch Transit 2612 BMO Bank of Montreal) 44 Mapleview Drive West I Barrie, Ontario L4N 61-4 kelly.hastings(@bmo.com (T) 705-719-0643 (F) 705-719-0567 Page 228 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From:Jacqueline Pegg<i pe hotmaillxom> Sent: March 29, 2020 2:12 PM To: . Council <.Q2.ufro .0 l..@..o r.o:_a o..n .a_c > Subject: Cannabis Production Application 2019-ZBA-01 submission Please accept this submission re Application 2019-ZBA-01 Cannabis Production and Processin,q Facilities I support the application to amend the by-law to reclassify Cannabis farming and processing from Agricultural (ARU) to Industrial (IR)zoning. Industrial zoning would allow the Township to better monitor the harmful effects many of which have not yet been determined or fully documented: • Disturbance to wildlife corridors due to 8'barbed wire fencing enclosure • Possibility of waste and plant toxins flowing into Lake Simcoedue due to changes in flood/drainage management and significant earthmoving (as currently seen on the 3rd Line) • Air quality from the smell of hemp and cannabis production which has not been controlled on the 7th line operation • Excessive light pollution • Devaluation of neighbouring farms, villages and residential homes. • Noise pollution in a rural setting • Loss of water in area wells due to very high water requirements(Cannabis plants), in a changing climate A crop that requires high barbed wire fencing, excessive water consumption, pervasive odours, excessive noise, and artificial lighting, does not belong on lands that are adjacent to residential and traditional farm settings. It belongs as you have proposed, on industrial lands and anticipate that Oro-Medonte will vigorously defend any appeal to its decision by the developer. We have lost too much prime agricultural land in Oro-Medonte and this needs to stop! Jacqueline Pegg 837 Line 4 North Oro-Medonte, ON LOL 2LO Page 229 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: santo calitri<santo_calitri@hotmail.com> Sent: March 29, 2020 3:00 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Comments re: Cannabis Draft By-law Dear Oro Medonte Planning Department,Town Council, and Mayor Hughes. Our names are Santo&Cheryl Calitri and have lived in Shanty Bay for 8 years. We know this is a challenging time for everyone and we realize that a public meeting cannot be held due to the Covid 19 Pandemic. 1. We have read the revised draft By-law and under Section 4.0 Table B3 the minimum setback from a sensitive land use should be 400-500 metres not 150 metres considering all the negative impacts a facility like this will produce. 2. You say that you are well aware of Site-Alterations taking place at 918 Line 3 South, but can only proceed with court actions when courts resume.You need to demand that the township give a STOP WORK order immediately. To the owners. They do not seem to consider surrounding residents or the village of Shanty Bay. Is this plot of land/owner exempt from following the laws of our municipality? We are concerned residents, that know these are difficult times, but this situation of a possible Cannabis Production and Processing Facility has increased our anxiety.The sure decline in real estate value of our home, as well as health risks. We want one common objective,that this project does not proceed, adjacent to our homes, and quiet neighborhoods of Shanty Bay. Sincerely, Santo&Cheryl Calitri 14 Red Oak Cres. Oro-Medonte, On. LOL 2L0 Page 230 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo From: Michael Lalonde<mlalonde@innovativeautomation.com> Sent: March 29, 2020 2:52 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Cc: Planning<Planning@oro-medonte.ca>; Stephanie_Conway@Hotmail.Com Subject: Comments re: Cannabis Draft By-law Dear Oro Medonte Planning Department, Town Council, and Mayor Hughes, My name is Michael Lalonde (Maple Grove Public School, '90) and I live at 25 Martine Cres. in Oro Medonte with my wife and two children. We have been here since 2012. Thank you for your efforts in making the required amendments to the cannabis by-law to ensure it would prohibit Cannabis, including Hemp, in all agriculture zones in Oro- Medonte. It only makes sense that this would be treated differently than traditional crops and farming activities. I have been in jurisdictions where these operations exist, and the amount of light pollution alone is profoundly disturbing. The entire sky glows orange. This proposed operation goes completely against the motivations Stephanie and I had when we chose to move here from a Barrie subdivision with hopes of raising our children in this great community. Thank you for your leadership. I support the amended cannabis by-law. Sincerely, Mike and Stephanie Page 231 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From:tvcrooks tvcrooks<tvcrooks@sympatico.ca> Sent: March 29, 2020 12:43 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca>; Planning<Planning@oro-medonte.ca> Subject:the Cannabis by law Dear Oro -Medonte Planning department, Town Council and Mayor Hughes My name is Rosaleen Crooks and my family have been residents of Shanty Bay for generations. I want to thank you for your efforts in making the required amendments ensuring it would prohibit Cannabis, including Hemp in all agricultural zones in Oro-Medonte. A crop that requires high fencing, security, water consumption, and disturbance to residents quality of life with a pervasive odour with excessive noise and artificial lighting does not belong on lands that are close to residential settings.We campaigned for the Lake Simcoe Protection Plan and there should be no waste and toxins allowed that would eventually seep into our beautiful Lake. There are nursery schools, daycares and subdivisions that abut the land presently in question. It would markedly impact the quality of life, and the real estate value of the homes in this area. Cannabis plants should only be allowed on industrial settings and not anywhere close to residential settings. I want to thank you for the Council's leadership in the matter and I fully support the amendment to the Cannabis By Law. Yours sincerely Rosaleen Crooks Page 232 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Wendy McKay<worrmckay@bell.net> Sent: March 28, 2020 5:17 PM To: . Council <Council@oro-medonte.ca>; Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject:Application 2019-ZBA-01 Cannabis Production and Processing Facilities: Public Comment Please accept this submission re Application 2019-ZBA-01 Cannabis Production and Processin,q Facilities I support the application to amend the by-law to reclassify Cannabis farming and processing from Agricultural (ARU) to Industrial (IR)zoning. Industrial zoning would allow the Township to better monitor the harmful effects many of which have not yet been determined or fully documented: • Disturbance to wildlife corridors due to 8'barbed wire fencing enclosure • Possibility of waste and plant toxins flowing into Lake Simcoedue due to changes in flood/drainage management and significant earthmoving (as currently seen on the 3rd Line) • Air quality from the smell of hemp and cannabis production which has not been controlled on the 7th line operation • Excessive light pollution • Devaluation of neighbouring farms, villages and residential homes. • Noise pollution in a rural setting • Loss of water in area wells due to very high water requirements(Cannabis plants), in a changing climate A crop that requires high barbed wire fencing, excessive water consumption, pervasive odours, excessive noise, and artificial lighting, does not belong on lands that are adjacent to residential and traditional farm settings. It belongs as you have proposed, on industrial lands and anticipate that Oro-Medonte will vigorously defend any appeal to its decision by the developer. Sincerely, Wendy McKay 218 7th Line South Oro-Medonte LOL 2EO �r2 p Ikay( e l.rr�etc 705-487-5200 Page 233 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Lydia <lydbarncigs@aol.com> Sent: March 28, 2020 3:56 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Cc: Planning<Planning@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Mayor and Council: I personally am very pleased you have decided to make changes to the existing bylaws to disallow cannabis growth/processing on the agricultural land that abuts our residential areas. Very pleased indeed, however the speed at which this land is being transformed is disturbing. I truly hope you have the best interests of the residents in your heart going forward when your authority will be challenged in the deconstruct of this property. Taking it one step further, their complete disregard for the aesthetics, bylaws, rules, common decency and consideration of the proximity of the school I feel they should be accountable to return the land as found including all trees. Yours Truly, Lydia Scott, 26 Red Oak Cres, Oro-Medonte Page 234 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: haideefish@gmail.com <haideefish@gmail.com> Sent: March 28, 2020 2:25 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca>; Planning<Planning@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Comments Re: Cannabis Draft By-law Dear Oro Medonte Planning Department, Town Council, and Mayor Hughes Thank you for your efforts in making the required amendments to the cannabis by-law to ensure it would prohibit Cannabis, including Hemp, in all agriculture zones in Oro- Medonte. Our names are Daniel & Haidee Fish we have resided in Oro-Medonte for 17 years. A crop that requires high fencing, security, excessive water consumption and disturbs residents' quality of life with a pervasive odour, excessive noise, and artificial lighting, does not belong on lands that are close to residential settings. It belongs in an industrial land. Thank you for your leadership. I support the amended cannabis by-law. Many thanks, Kind Regards Daniel and Haidee Fish Page 235 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: lastwoundup lastwoundup<lastwoundup@sympatico.ca> Sent: March 28, 2020 1:45 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca>; Planning<Planning@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Fwd:To our Mayor and Councillors- I am fully in support of the amendment Council is recommending Hi- I should have included my name and address: Linda Wells 22 Simcoe Road Oro Station LOL2EO many thanks for entering this email below into the public record ---------- Original Message ---------- From: lastwoundup lastwoundup <1_ sl r na.�1�1M(crl rnpaticoxa> To: cannabis < cannabis e),oro medonte.ca>, planning<pll�anpin 0)oro medo nte.ca> Date: March 28, 2020 at 9:02 AM Subject: To our Mayor and Councillors - I am fully in support of the amendment Council is recommending to limit the growing of industrial marijuana and hemp to areas zoned Industrial. This is the reasoned and wise decision . For all the reasons you have considered I fully support this amendment to protect our residents from all the ills that such operations would bring to the peace and enjoyment of our lives. Thanks as well to our planners. Thank you for your wisdom in this matter 416 654 2777 I_rit�v...:ou.nd::aap..(�r�s�pat aco4ca What would the world be, once bereft Of wet and wildness? Let them be left, O let them be left, wildness and wet, Long live the weeds and the wildness yet. Inversnaid Poem Gerard Manley Hopkins Page 236 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From:Jim Hill <jtlex.300@gmail.com> Sent: March 28, 2020 11:08 AM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca>; Planning<Planning@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: re: Cannabis Draft By-law Dear Oro-Medonte Planning Department, Town Council, and Mayor Hughes, My name is James Hill and I have lived in Oro—Medonte for 22 years. We have enjoyed living within this very well preserved community throughout this time. As a resident of Shanty Bay, we are located immediately behind the Trans Canada rail trail that runs between Barrie and Orillia. This recreational trail is used and enjoyed by many folks during all four seasons of the year. We feel that the development of a Cannabis Production Facility immediately beside this trail will ultimately ruin this beautiful part of our community. A crop that requires high fencing, security, excessive water consumption and disturbs residents' quality of life with a pervasive odour, excessive noise, and artificial lighting, does not belong on lands that are close to residential/recreational settings. It belongs in an industrial land. Many thanks for your efforts in making the required amendments to the cannabis by- law to ensure it would prohibit Cannabis, including Hemp, in all agriculture zones in Oro-Medonte. We cannot express enough gratitude towards all parties involved in helping to ensure that our community and the surrounding land is preserved. Sincerely, Jim Hill Page 237 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: John Thompson <jjshantybay@aol.com> Sent: March 28, 2020 10:45 AM To: Cannabis <Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Cc: Planning <Planning@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Cannabis Draft By - Law Our name is Thompson and we have lived in Oro for 47 years at 1935 Ridge Road West formally 14 Brooks Street Thank you for making the required amendment to only allow cannabis to be grown on industrial lands We support the amended By - Law and thank you for your leadership Sincerely Jane and Jack Thompson 1935 Ridge Road West Page 238 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From:Jeff Scott<jeffcscott@rocketmail.com> Sent: March 28, 2020 10:43 AM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject:Jeff Scott 26 Red Oak Crescent Oro-Medonte LOL 2LO Dear Mayor and Council of the Great lands of Oro-Medonte. My name is Jeff Scott who resides at 26 Red Oak Crescent Oro-Medonte LOL 21-0. I have resided in our community for over 12 years. I am writing this email in stating our families position on the highly sensitive topic of Cannabis Production and Processing Facilities. NEW PROPOSED BY-LAW : First and foremost, let me thank each and every one of you for your efforts and excellent stewardship making the required amendments to the Cannabis by-law ensuring this by-law would "prohibit Cannabis & Hemp in agricultural zones in Oro- Medonte". In my opinion our quality of life would be suspect living in Oro-Medonte. Given the pervasive odour, excessive noise, fencing for security etc, I would opine this type of business does not belong on lands that are close proximity to schools, residential, walking trails not with standing the dramatic negative impact that would be thrust upon our collective residential real estate values. My family has chosen to build their home and raise their family in Oro-Medonte as well so please allow me to add my Grandchildren to the list in supporting this new proposed by-law. Thanking you in advance for your time and efforts. Yours Truly Jeff Scott Page 239 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From:Judi Bolton <judibolton@yahoo.ca> Sent: March 28, 2020 8:26 AM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject:Just say NO Council Say NO to cannabis growth except on Industrial land. When I see the drone videos of what this company is doing to beautiful farm land my heart bleeds! This company has no respect for our community or this property! Seeing mature trees yanked out by their roots and thrown aside .... insanity! Please STOP this sinful abuse of farm land!!!! Thank you Judi Bolton Page 240 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From:Ania Kielar<aniakielar@gmail.com> Sent: March 28, 2020 7:18 AM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Re:proposed amendment to the Township's Comprehensive Zoning By-law 97-95 Dear Mayor and councillors: Re: proposed amendment to the Township's Comprehensive Zoning By-law 97-95, to permit cannabis production and processing facilities within the Township of Oro-Medonte. My name is Ania Kielar and I live at 171 Bay St. In Shanty Bay. This is a historic hamlet which needs to be preserved. Having a cannabis plant so close to Arbour Woods,right next to the rail trail and only a few hundred meters from the water is not acceptable. The owner on have already cut down the trees and appear to plan to put a fence in place. The lack of trees will lead to increase cross winds across the road on line 2 and line 3, thereby increasing risks of snow drifts and poor visibility (as is the case on highway 400 at highway 88/89). This can lead to increase risk of motor vehicle accidents. crop that requires high fencing, security, excessive water consumption and disturbs residents' quality of life with a pervasive odour, excessive noise, and artificial lighting, does not belong o lands that are close to residential settings. It belongs in an industrial land. If you allow cannabis to be planted in the currently planned location, property values will drop and your tax revenues will suffer as a result. Asa mother of a 2 year old, I don't want him growing up seeing andsmelling this industrial plant on a daily basis. It will be located only a few hundred meters from Shanty Bay pulic school. Although cannabis has been legalized, is known to affect the normal development of teenage brains and it is not something I ever want him to use (like smoking and alcohol abuse). This type of plant should not be allowed in our close knit community and I strrongly oppose it. Ania Kielar Page 241 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: karel.mucha@gmail.com <karel.mucha@gmail.com> Sent: March 27, 2020 4:42 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Cc: Planning<Planning@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Cannabis Draft By-Law Dear Oro-Medonte Planning Department,Town Council and Mayor Hughes My name is Karel Mucha at 9 Walnut Drive, Shanty Bay.Thank you for your leadership. I SUPPORT THE AMENDED CANNABIS BY-LAW. Thankyou for your efforts in making the required amendments to the cannabis by-law to ensure it would PROHIBIT Cannabis, including Hemp, in all agriculture zones in Oro-Medonte. LAND SHOULD BE FOR GROWING FOOD! Not in close proximity to large residential area that pay high property taxes, school ,daycare, baseball diamonds and parks recreational walking trails, near Lake Simcoe etc. A crop that requires excessive water and hydro consumption, strong odour, high fencing and security, does not belong on lands that are close to residential setting. It belongs in industrial land. Regards Karel Mucha Page 242 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From:family.mucha@gmail.com <family.mucha@gmail.com> Sent: March 27, 2020 4:40 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Cc: Planning<Planning@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Comments re: Cannabis Draft By Law Dear Oro-Medonte Planning Department,Town Council and Mayor Hughes My name is Cheryl Mucha at 9 Walnut Drive, Shanty Bay and I support Mayor Hughes Thankyou for your efforts in making the required amendments to the cannabis by-law to ensure it would PROHIBIT Cannabis, including Hemp, in all agriculture zones in Oro-Medonte. LAND SHOULD BE FOR GROWING FOOD! Not in close proximity to large residential area that pay high property taxes, school ,daycare, baseball diamonds and parks recreational walking trails, near Lake Simcoe etc.. A crop that requires excessive water and hydro consumption, strong odour, high fencing and security, does not belong on lands that are close to residential setting. It belongs in industrial land. Thank you for your leadership. I SUPPORT THE AMENDED CANNABIS BY-LAW. Regards Cheryl Mucha Page 243 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: bettridge171@rogers.com <bettridge171@rogers.com> Sent: March 27, 2020 4:24 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Cannabis Draft by-law Dear Oro Medonte Planning Dept.,Town Council and Mayor Hughes: My name is Mark Bettridge and I have resided at 22 Gowan Rd in Shanty Bay for 29 years. Thank you so much for your efforts in making the required ammendment to the cannabis by law to ensure that it would prohibit cannabis, including hemp, in all agricultural zones in Oro Medonte. It is my understanding that Cannabis and hemp are crops that require high fencing, security, use excessive water and will disturb resident's quality of life with its pervasive odours, excessive noise and artificial lighting. For these reasons it clearly does not belong on lands that are close to or abut residential settings or are in close proximity to villages or schools. It is an industry and belongs in/on industrial land. Thank you for your leadership and support on this important issue. I fully support the amended cannabis by law. Sincerely Mark Bettridge 22 Gowan Rd Oro Medonte ON LOL2L0 Page 244 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From:Janet Bettridge<janetbettridge@gmail.com> Sent: March 27, 2020 4:21 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Comments re cannabis draft by law Dear Oro Medonte Planning Dept.,Town Council and Mayor Hughes: My name is Janet Bettridge and I have resided at 22 Gowan Rd in Shanty Bay for 29 years. Thank you so much for your efforts in making the required ammendment to the cannabis by law to ensure that it would prohibit cannabis, including hemp, in all agricultural zones in Oro Medonte. It is my understanding that Cannabis and hemp are crops that require high fencing, security, use excessive water and will disturb resident's quality of life with its pervasive odours, excessive noise and artificial lighting. For these reasons it clearly does not belong on lands that are close to or abut residential settings or are in close proximity to villages or schools. It is an industry and belongs in/on industrial land. Thank you for your leadership and support on this important issue. I fully support the amended cannabis by law. Sincerely Janet Bettridge 22 Gowan Rd Oro Medonte ON LOL2LO Page 245 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Craig Fowler<craigfowler@rogers.com> Sent: March 27, 2020 4:15 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca>; Planning<Planning@oro-medonte.ca> Cc: Hughes, Harry<harry.hughes@oro-medonte.ca>; Hough, Ralph <ralph.hough@oro-medonte.ca>; Keane, Cathy<cathy.keane@oro-medonte.ca>; Dunn, Robin <rdunn@oro-medonte.ca>; Witlib, Derek <dwitlib@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Comments re: Cannabis Draft By-law Dear Oro Medonte Planning Department, Town Council, and Mayor Hughes, My name is Craig Fowler and I have lived in Oro—Medonte for 8 years. As someone who is born and raised in Simcoe County has a family that includes two elementary-aged sons who go to Shanty Bay Public School has an undergraduate degree in Urban and Regional Planning, a Master's degree in Local Economic Development and has spent my entire career in the Broader Public Sector I am appalled that this development is even being contemplated for the site. Obviously based on my background I understand the fundamental evolution that a given parcel of land goes through as surrounding use change and municipal needs shift, but this site is not the right location in any land-use policy that I have seen or written. I have been observing this issue from a distance for quite some time. I have put my faith that the land-use planning municipal process would catch this wrong and make it right. I am happy to see that the Council is finally acting in the best interests of the majority. I am honestly disappointed with how far this has gone and what the landowner has done to their property. I understand they are well within their rights to do this but they must have done this based on signals they may have either received or misunderstood from municipal staff and/or Council. You must send a clear and definitive signal that this use is not welcome on this property or any other property that has similar characteristics or zoning in this municipality. I wish to thank you for your efforts in making the required amendments to the cannabis by-law to ensure it would prohibit Cannabis, including Hemp, in all agriculture zones in Oro-Medonte. A crop that requires high fencing, security, excessive water consumption and disturbs residents' quality of life with a pervasive odour, excessive noise, and artificial lighting, does not belong on lands that are close to residential settings. It belongs in industrial land tracks and zoning. Thank you for your leadership. I support the amended cannabis by-law. Sincerely, Craig Fowler 5 Walnut Drive Oro-Medonte L0L2L0 Page 246 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From:Trevor Owen <trevor.owen@owendickey.com> Sent: March 27, 2020 3:51 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Cc: Bruce Owen <bruceowen@owendickey.com>; Heather Owen (howenster@gmail.com) <howenster@gmail.com> Subject: Comments on Cannabis Production in Oro-Medonte Dear Mayor Hughes & Council: I would like to respectfully submit my objections to having a cannabis processing facility in Oro- Medonte in general but particularly in the Shanty Bay area where one is proposed. Why? I would note the following variables: 1) The Shanty Bay area is one of the more densely populated parts of the Township. A production facility of this sort will likely affect more Oro-Medonte residents in this location more than most others. This is inappropriate; 2) The Shanty Bay area has both Shanty Bay School, the historic St. Thomas' Anglican Church (oldest church in the Oro and Barrie area), a cemetery and a store. Children are shipped to Shanty Bay school from all over the first four (4) concessions of the municipality. People of all ages from a wide geographic area within Oro-Medonte are periodically at St. Thomas' Anglican Church and its accompanying cemetery at varying times of the week. Unusual smells and contents of winds will disrupt the ability of children to play/learn and adults to socialize and worship. Simply put there are few other areas in the municipality in which this configuration of variables is present. In other words, it is difficult to conceive of a worse place or a more inappropriate place for such a facility. 3) Candidly any location near the rail trail will mean the ability of a wind to take smells to the highest taxpayers per square foot in Oro-Medonte which are those taxpayers living on Lake Simcoe. People pay higher taxes in the hope that such contribution to Oro-Medonte coffers will at least result in equal treatment to other taxpayers as opposed to having to endure the smells/problems associated with a cannabis production site; 4) While production of cannabis is not the same as distribution of cannabis it is not illogical that distribution minimally starts at the processing site. There is little sense in having such a facility so close by to the one of the comparatively few schools we have in our municipality. 5) The people behind the proposal know that there is no municipal approval for their project. While they are undoubtedly out of pocket significant funds they have done advance work on what has been, to date, a speculative basis. They already know that there is notable opposition to this proposal from Oro-Medonte residents. This is not a situation in which government will be unfairly treating them. Rather it is much more of a situation in Page 247 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... which government is listening to its residents which in a democracy is the way things are supposed to unfold. 6) Undoubtedly the backers of the facility will argue that the problems listed above will be minimal. However, other residents in other areas near cannabis production facilities differ. When problems arise it will then be too late to remedy them. Best to not have problems in the first instance. I genuinely and respectfully trust that the factors listed in this brief email are not only taken into account (which I believe likely) but will also be determinative in the decisions of our elected officials on this important issue. Trevor Owen Shanty Bay area/Oro-Medonte 50 year long resident Page 248 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: martha Billes<tirelady@ctire.com> Sent:April 7, 2020 9:02 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca>; Planning<Planning@oro-medonte.ca> Cc: Hughes, Harry<harry.hughes@oro-medonte.ca>;tirelady@ctire.com Subject: Re: Cannabis draft by-law Good evening Please ensure that the addendum/post script to my letter will be attached in the minutes. The reader omitted the reading of my postscript during the meeting session. I would appreciate confirmation that this inclusion be made in the published record of letters. Please and thank you. Martha Billes. 1511 and 1547 Ridge Rd West. LOL 2LO. Sent from my B1ackBerry the most secure mobile device via the Bell Network From: tireladyCcbctire.com Sent: March 30, 2020 12:08 PM To: can nabis(a)oro-medonte.ca; planning(doro-medonte.ca Subject: Cannabis draft by-law Chez Billes 151111547 Ridge Road West, Shanty Bay, Oro-Medonte, LOL 2LO March 30, 2020, Cannabis DraftBy-law Atterntion: Oro Medonte Planning Department, Town Council, and Mayor Hughes, Dear Sirs: y FAMILYAND NOW MYSELF HAVE BEEN OWNERS OF THIS PROPERTY SINCE 193T IT IS A RELIEF TO SEE THE DRAFT BYLA W amendments to the cannabis by-law which will hopefully ensure the prohibition of genus Cannabis, including Hemp, in all agriculture zones in Oro-Medonte. Such intense measures involved in cannabis/hemp production belongs only in industrial lands not anywhere near residential or recreational land. I am in support of the draft by-law as 1 have seen it and further I would support additions designed to enhance the protection of our residential community. Thank you for your leadership. Sincerely, Martha G Billes,LLD Chancellor, University of Guelph Post script. I share the following concerns with fellow residents: • Disturbance to wildlife due to fencing, lighting to grow crops, noise from generator • Waste and toxins flowing in to Lake Simcoe • Proximity to churches, schools, nursery schools and daycares, the nature walking trail, baseball diamonds and community parks and most of all subdivisions, personal homes and summer cottages • Air quality from the smell of hemp and cannabis production • Security requirements • Increased traffic of large vehicles • Decline in real estate value..................................MG Billes Page 249 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Val Holt <val _paulvalco.com> Subject: Re: Regarding -Zoning Changes Needed To STOP Industrial Cannabis Processing Facility Date: March 27, 2020 at 9:54:03 AM EDT To: harry.hughes(c)oro-medonte.ca, ralph.hough(d-)oro-medonte.ca, ian.ve itch(D-oro- medonte.ca, tammy.desousa(a)-oro-medonte.ca, shawn.scott(a)-oro-medonte.ca, cathy.keane(a)-oro-medonte.ca, randy.greenlaw(a�-oro-medonte.ca It looks like work just continues to go on at 918 Line 3 south in Shanty Bay. Can council please DEMAND that the township gives a Stop Work order to the owners of this property? We need to act before it is too late. Val and Paul Holt 165 Bay Street Oro-Medonte LOL21-0 On Mar 20, 2020, at 3:40 PM, Val Holt<valg aulvalco.com>wrote: With the coronavirus hitting our shores and cannabis production facilities springing up in our neighbourhoods, these are very uncertain times and stressful times in our community. We are concerned citizens and home owners in Shanty Bay. We are opposed to allowing an industrial Cannabis Processing Facility in our area. There are so many reasons that we can not allow this to happen. We are sure you have heard them all. This village and this lake are so rare and special. Once a factory is here, things will change forever. Allowing cannabis processing facilities on agricultural land can and will pose many problems for years to come. The degradation of farming land, environmental concerns including extensive water consumption and wastewater handling, ingesting harmful chemicals, lack of infrastructure for migrant workers, disruption to animal life through high fencing and continuous manufactured light, and aesthetically changing the appearance of our communities to include 100s of acres with 6 ft chain link fencing and security measures to name a few. Real estate value will decrease significantly and this affects you! This business belongs on industrial lands. Page 250 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo Please don't allow this issue to slip through the cracks because everyone is focused on Covidl9. Regards va� pmfl I ofi, 16 5 B ay S�re c Oro MC(Iow,c 1"0 2 LO Page 251 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Kimberly Trudeau <kimtrudeau7(a)_gmail.com> Sent: April 7, 2020 5:58 PM To: Hughes, Harry <harry.hughes oro-medonte.ca>; Keane, Cathy <cathy.keane(a)oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Cannabis facility Good Evening, I am a mother of three young children living in Shanty Bay who is deeply concerned about the potential cannabis facility being built behind my home. There are many reasons I am concerned for my family and for our quality of life which I have written about in a previous letter, but there is one more concern that and that is what effect this facility will have on the quality of our drinking water. Given the location of this facility, I suspect it will impact the run-off which will effect Lake Simcoe as well as the properties that surround that area. I also suspect that it will impact our drinking water. There are examples in Ontario's history, for example, Walkerton, where water was contaminated because of inappropriate activities occurring too close to town wells. Please don't make us another example. Enforce the by-law and make the wording more specific to prevent any loop holes. Thank you, Kim Trudeau and family Page 252 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: kuch klaus <kuchklaus8@g mail.com> Sent: April 7, 2020 7:22 PM To: Cannabis <Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Cannabis production, By-Law Amendment Ms & Sirs I am klaus Kuch, a long-term full-time Resident of Oro-Medonte. First of all, I wish to thank Council and Staff for accepting input and streaming today's public meeting. I also want to express my full support for the proposed By-Law amendment that limits cannabis production to ED and IR Zones. I also concerned that this amendment will be strongly opposed. Both the Federal and the Provincial Governments wish to facilitate cannabis production. Substantial financial interests are also involved. I suggest there should be a Plan B in case of a successful challenge before the OMB or in Court. I suggest there should be a Plan B. To my mind, Plan B could involve the building of a consensus of what we do and what we don'e want in the Township. Personally, I support economic growth and job creation within the rural residential framework we have come to enjoy. Accordingly, development must not infringe on the health and quality of life of local residents such as unacceptable smell, noise, light and obstructions. Developers should bear the burden that their ventures will not in any way impede or damage the legitimate interests referred to above. More stringent building by-laws, zoning by-laws, noise by-laws and laws regulating water use could be enacted to create a second tier, in case of a successful challenge to the proposed amendment. Compliance may be enhanced by the posting of bonds along with certain applications. Sincerely, Klaus Kuch April 7th, 2020 Page 253 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From:Joshua Aube<josh.aube.3@gmail.com> Sent:April 7, 2020 5:30 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: By-laws amendment- line 3 I am concerned with the construction on the agricultural land on line 3. I am concerned with the environmental pollution, light pollution, sound pollution,potential for damage to the Simcoe lake, etc. Regards, Josh Page 254 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Gail Raikes <gailraikesg=ail.com> Date: Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 2:06 PM Subject: Prohibiting Cannibus Facilities on Agricultural Lands To: <cathy.keane(a�oro-medonte.ca> Cc: Hughes, Harry<harr�hu esgoro-medonte.ca>, <ralph.houghgoro-medonte.ca>, <ian.veitchgoro-medonte.ca>, <tammy.desousa(a�oro-medonte.ca>, <shawn.scott(c(�oro- medonte.ca>, <randy.greenlawkoro-medonte.ca> Good afternoon Councillor Keane, I strongly object to allowing cannibus facilities on agricultural lands in Oro-Medonte. As a resident of Oro-Medonte for 40 years, I have seen many changes in our Township. Any by-law allowing cannibus facilities on agricultural land would certainly rank as a very bad decision leading to negative change. You are, I'm sure, aware of the negative impacts of cannibus facilities on people, animals and the environment. In your deliberations on April 7, consider the effects these facilities would have on our Township and its residents. Cannibus facilities must be considered only on industrial-zoned lands. Do not allow these facilities on agricultural lands in Oro-Medonte. Gail Raikes 9 Trafalgar Drive Oro-Medonte, ON LOL 2L0 Page 255 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo From: Lynnette Eisen <Iynnette.eisen@rogers.com> Sent:April 7, 2020 8:52 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca>; 'Oro Medonte' <oromedonte4safecannabiszoning@gmaii.com> Subject: FW:Automatic reply: New Cannabis By Law Hello Oro-Medonte Staff, Can you please ensure that my name and my husband's name (Mitch Eisen) is include as supporting this new by-law. Copy of the email and acknowledged receipt is below. We both sent ernails on March 30, 2020 but did not hear our letters being read. With thanks Lynnette and Mitch Eisen 112 Bay Street Shanty Bay From: Cannabis [mailto:Cannabis(&oro-medonte.ca] Sent: March 30, 2020 4:33 PM To: Lynnette Eisen Subject: Automatic reply: New Cannabis By Law Thank you for your email is is acknowledged as received. Your email will become part of the public record and will be formally received during the April 7, 2020 Public Meeting, provided it contains your name and address. his etin ail ),jvas scam�c,d 11'1,1 Dear Oro Medonte Planning Department, Town Council, and Mayor Hughes, My name is Lynnette Eisen and I live at 112 Bay Street, in Oro —Medonte. I have lived in Oro-Mledonte for 29 years. I am writing to thank you and support the suggested new bylaw which to my understanding will ensure that marijuana and hemp operations will be restricted to Industrial and Economic lands in Oro Medonte. I am extremely concerned with the activity occurring at the property off the rail trail between the 2 nd and 3rd lines which strongly suggests an application from the owners will be forthcoming. Marijuana and Page 256 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... hemp operations which include processing facilities are far different than other crops. The concerns with respect to odours, noise, excessive light in the evenings, regular large truck traffic and water consumption, to name a few, will negatively impact the Shanty Bay community in a significant fashion, altering the quiet character of this rural settlement and potentially the health of its residents. Neither the residents of Shanty Bay nor any other community in Oro-Medonte should have to put up with a manufacturing plant right next door. I would ask that the bylaw be clear that both marijuana and hemp are restricted to Industrial and Economic lands. I wish to thank the Council for both listening to and acting upon residents concerns in supporting the proposed bylaw. Kind regards, Lynnette Eisen Page 257 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Catherine D'Angelo<cgdangelo64@gmail.com> Sent:April 7, 2020 8:33 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Urgent Dear Mayor Hughes, Councillors and planning staff. My husband and I have been researching properties and had narrowed our search to Lake Simcoe in the Shanty Bay area and Stoney Lake. Before we continue our search and make a final decision between these two locations, I want to make sure that that cannabis production and processing operations are not permitted in agricultural areas in Oro Medonte. Although our location preference is Oro Medonte, there is no way we want to buy or build anywhere near a cannabis facility. It is a well known fact that the smell permeates for kilometres and the security fences, ongoing light and traffic are not conducive to the healthy community life we are looking for. I find it hard to believe anyone would approve a cannabis facility in this pristine waterfront. Please designate these operations to appropriate lands. I support your amended bylaw and hope to continue our search. Sincerely, Catherine and Anthony D'Angelo Toronto, Ontario Page 258 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo From: Slawomira Hatlas Weber<slawka@webergraphics.ca> Sent:April 7, 2020 5:04 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Comments re: Cannabis Draft By-law Dear Oro Medone Planning Department, Town Council, and Mayor Hughes, My name is Slawomira Hatlas Weber and I have lived in Oro—Medonte for 20 years. Thank you for your efforts in making the required amendments to the cannabis by-law to ensure it would prohibit Cannabis, including Hemp, in all agriculture zones in Oro-Medonte. A crop that requires high fencing, security, excessive water consumption and disturbs residents'quality of life with a pervasive odour, excessive noise, and artificial lighting, does not belong on lands that are close to residential settings. It belongs in an industrial land. Thank you for your leadership. I support the amended cannabis by-law. Sincerely, Slawomira Hatlas Weber Page 259 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... The Township of Oro-Medonte April 7, 2020 This letter is in reference to the meeting on Tuesday,April 7t" regarding the proposed amendment to the Township's Comprehensive Zoning By-law 97-95,to permit cannabis production and processing facilities within the Township of Oro-Medonte. First, it is disturbing that this meeting was announced on March 18t" during the COVID-19 crisis.The intent to hold a meeting during such crisis where personal presence is restricted prohibits the public from attending what is labelled as a public meeting. We understand that the meeting is being recorded and live streamed which allows the public to view without comment. The request to change the definition of Sensitive Land Use is at question.The original definition states; "Sensitive Land Use Means an existing residential building, existing place of worship building, or lands containing or zoned to permit a public or private school, a day nursery, a public park, a public trail or a community centre." And the newest proposed amendment states; Sensitive Land Use means an existing residential building, existing place of worship building or lands containing or zoned to permit a public or private school, day nursery, public park or community centre. The change involving the wording "a public trail" does not appear on the proposed amendment. As the former rail trail, now a very well used piece of the Trans Canada Trail runs through a large portion of the township of Oro-Medonte we object to a public trail being omitted from the Sensitive Land Use definition. Why was this omitted? In addition, could you please confirm the current zoning for the area noted on the Township of Oro- Medonte Zoning Bylaw Schedule A2, Line 2 S to Line 3 S and north of the CNR.This area is identified as 26 and 27 on the schedule. Please advise in writing the following email; sdlaplante@sympatico.ca Thank you, The LaPlante Family...Tracy, Sandi, Lucas and Sydney 138 William St, Oro-Medonte AKA Shanty Bay Page 260 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Sue Harrison <harrisonsue04@gmail.com> Sent:April 7, 2020 4:59 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Cc: Keane, Cathy<cathy.keane@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Cannabis Production and Processing Facilities To whom it may concern among Township staff and Council members, I am writing in regards to the most recent draft of By-law 2020 to Amend Zoning By-law 97-95 regarding Cannabis Production and Processing Facilities. I am a resident of the Shanty Bay area and, until recently, I was under the impression that if I was not a cannabis consumer, I had no need to concern myself with any aspect of its growth or production. I was gravely mistaken. In February, I discovered that a nearby piece of land was potentially preparing to become part of this industry. Based on proximity to our home and the rural lifestyle we sought by moving here, I decided it was important to learn more about it. One cannot advocate [or protest] anything from a position of ignorance. The majority of what I discovered is enclosed in the email below, as submitted to Mr. Witlib on Feb 13/20. I include it again, hoping that my findings may help to inform any Councillor or resident of the Township who wishes to read it and learn more. I fear that the majority of our residents will not perceive the cannabis industry to be an issue, until it comes to their backyard. I felt the same way, and it was a mistake. I encourage every resident of Oro-Medonte to learn about the impacts of this new business, before that occurs. As it pertains directly to the draft of By-law 2020 to Amend Zoning By-law 97-95, 1 am grateful that the hard-working Township staff have reached a conclusion similar to mine, and that they are recommending that Cannabis Production and Processing be relegated to Economic Development and Industrial zoned lands. I am in strong support of this recommendation. I have concerns regarding the ease/difficulty for a landowner to potentially pursue re-zoning to suit their needs in this regard. Unlimited time and resources can often accomplish seemingly impossible things. I ask that Township and Council do what they can to further tighten any part of this by-law that would prevent such a'loop-hole' for any interested parties. In addition, I have a concern about the Minimum set back from a Sensitive Land Use. All reports regarding the impact of this industry include a myriad of negative by-products. I ask Township and Council to review the 150m setback distance in the current draft, and consider increasing that significantly to prevent putting the health and enjoyment of any school, child care centre,place of worship or our cherished recreational resources at risk. I am extremely grateful for the work of Council and the Township staff on this matter-- especially in light of the current COVID-19 situation and the limitations presents. Thank you for your time and consideration, Sue Harrison 56 Red Oak Cres Page 261 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... Shanty Bay ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hello Derek, I am a resident of the Shanty Bay area, living in the Arbourwood neighbourhood,just off of line 2 south. I am reaching out in regards to Zoning By-law 97-95/No. 2019 Draft- thank you for extending the deadline to receive our input. It has come to my attention that a parcel of land between Lines 2 and 3, immediately north of the Rail Trail, has undergone a flurry of recent activity. All of which, seems to be consistent with the preparation of a cannabis production and/or processing facility. While the proximity of this particular parcel of land has triggered my engagement, the reading I have done has brought to light a series of concerns that should be carefully reviewed on behalf of ALL residents of Oro- Medonte as a permanent by-law is established. Apologies for the length, but I want to be sure that anyone who has opportunity to review this is fully equipped. CONSIDERATIONS FOR PRODUCTION PROXIMAL TO RESIDENTIAL SPACES/ SETTLEMENTS - • Light pollution -production requires controlled light cycles, which can create 12-18 straight hours of light or darkness. Artificial lighting of this nature have the potential to disrupt entire life cycles, starting with insects, impacting nocturnal prey's ability to conceal itself, and the disorientation of migratory birds. There are also links to human circadian rhythms that have far reaching health impacts. o hgps://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/cannabis-greenhouses-light-12ollution- 1.4993407 o https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V_A78zDBwYE • Air pollution + odour -beyond the basic desire to enjoy one's own property without foul scents in your backyard, the newest research suggests that the terpenes given off by cannabis plants can mix with other combustion gases to create ground level ozone - a known toxin. This risk is becoming more prevalent as legal grow ops sprout up all over North America, and particularly when adjacent to major city centres where large sources of combustion gases are typically found...i.e. Barrie and the GTA. In a rural area like Oro, with normally few sources of VOCs, any new source of such pollutants are likely to lead to the production of ozone. Major cities in the US have commissioned official studies of this issue in the past 12 months - lending credibility to the concern. o https://www.sciencefriday.com/segments/cannabis-air-pollution/ o hgps://modernfarmer.com/2019/09/could-cannabis-_rig-facilities-be-bad-for- air-quality/ o https://mailtribune.com/news/top-stories/school-sours-on-stench-of-hemp • Sound/ noise pollution - cannabis production often create substantial amounts of noise pollution through road use, traffic, security patrol, and equipment use (generators, Page 262 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... dehumidifiers, climate control). In addition to the ability to impact one's enjoyment of their own property during the day, it is fairly common knowledge that sleep disturbance has wide reaching negative impact to human health. Animal behaviours and response patterns can also change as a result of noise as low as 55-600. Noise from commercial equipment can run from 70-110dB depending upon size of the equipment and/or layering of use. o https://www.nationalgeographic.or encyclopedia/noise-pollution/ o https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4608916/ SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS - • Environmental concerns - Water sourcing, use and shed. Soil health. Energy load. Chemical use and run-off from butane [used during extraction], pesticides, herbicides,rodenticides, and fertilizers. Biomagnification. All of these must be carefully considered - in the context of environmental longevity AND resource management for nearby residents. o https://www.mccarthy.ca/en/insi htg s/blogs/canadian-era-perspectives/spotlight- cannabis-part-2-taking-closer-look-environmental-costs-cannabis-cultivation o Naps://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/ottawa-urged-to-consider-environmental- impacts-of-legal-marijuana-1.3750799 o baps://www.vice.coin/en_nz/article/8c�8z/growing-weed-is-pretty-bad-for-the- environment- weedweek2017?utm source=viceadwordsdynamicus&utm medium=cp • Safety - beyond the obvious safety issues related to placing industry next door to residential areas, there is the threat of potential unwanted visitors to nearby homes, and the use of butane in the extraction of cannabis oil, which is explosive at normal temperatures. • Enforcement pressures and liabilities - the draft by-law speaks to site plan controls and regulations (i.e. odour impact analysis, light and odour control and maintenance) o Who is accountable for monitoring compliance? o Nuisance complaints regarding light, sound and odour are notoriously difficult to enforce - who does the measuring, who's measure is correct, which level of government sets each 'acceptable' limit? Is the township prepared to manage/ enforce these regulations and associated complaints? Does any inability to enforce these things put the Township at risk? Does the cost of additional monitoring and enforcement ultimately fall to the taxpayers? • Timing - based on the current pace of play at 918 Line 3 S, one could surmise that the owner is attempting to 'beat the clock' on the establishment of a permanent by-law? perhaps there are also other properties experiencing the same thing elsewhere in the township? • Shanty Bay Public School - some fellow residents and I have spent the better part of 2019 advocating with the Ministry of Education and the SCDSB for a new elementary school in our area. There is a student accommodation crisis in Oro- Medonte, and the existing Shanty Bay property offers the perfect solution for that Page 263 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... problem. While the decision current remains in the hands of the Ministry, we are hopeful that they are aligned with the vision for a new school in this area. We anticipate funding decisions for the province will be announced after the labour disputes are resolved. If the results are positive, it should be noted that the property at 918 Line 3 S is 0.40km from the school -- I strongly suggest it is a very bad idea to permit cannabis production/processing so close to such a critical location for the children of our community. If I can share any additional information about this situation, I would be happy to. I would like to see Township and Council create a by-law that locates and regulates this new industry appropriately with a'family-first'mindset. • include ALL species of cannabis in this by-law • limit cannabis growth and production to Industrial or Manufacturing zones • IF Agricultural zones are to be permitted, include exemption or location regulations by significantly increasing minimum set backs/placement 0 2km from any resident or residential area 0 5km from any sensitive land use area-parks, church, schools, hospitals, etc o an appropriate distance from environmentally protected/sensitive lands - including aquifers, and our Lake Simcoe Protection Boundaries • site plan controls that also include assessment/analyses of water and energy needs/ disruption, as the use rates are significant relative to existing draws The relative newness of this industry obligates us to err on the side of caution- rooting our choices in the safety and security of the families who live here. I am not suggesting we dismiss the importance of growth and prosperity- it is not an "all or none" proposition. Oro-Medonte has enough space to accomplish both and, if done correctly, to become a benchmark for other areas of the province. The information that exists is consistent in its concern about the issues noted above, and if we don't get it right, we may be dealing with the fall out for decades down the line. We have the opportunity to leverage intelligence and experience from other towns/cities to avoid the problems their residents are facing- to be thought leaders in how this industry can provide it's financial benefits to communities without destroying them. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sue +Mark Harrison 56 Red Oak Cres Page 264 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... Cannabis in Oro-MedonteM I Chris Mavreas 5 Diane Court V t �1 n. Oro-Medonte LOL 2L0 Dear Council First off, I would like to express I am 100%opposed to Cannabis production in Oro Township and more specifically right in my back yard in Shanty Bay. My kids and I moved to Oro 5 years ago to get out of the city and what Oro and Shanty Bay had to offer. I am very concerned about how everything has unfolded regarding the marijuana facility being developed between the 2"d and the 3rd line and what's been communicated to the residents of Oro. I sent an email as requested by the township before the Feb deadline and requested a response and I never did hear back. I have used the internet to research the effects of local marijuana facilities and how it affects nearby communities and feedback from the residents and there is nothing positive from it. Its been communicated that the Township has not approved a marijuana facility between the 2"d and 3rd line however all the trees surrounding the very large 265 acre property have been uprooted and major construction has been underway for quite sometime. Proposal,drawings,permits and by-laws all need to be approved by the township before anything can move forward so how is this being able to continue if the Township knows nothing about it? What is being developed there that the township does know and has approved? Why does the township want to allow this type of operation in our community? Why does the township feel this is good for our community? What good will come from allowing it? What are the potential negative issues you are aware of? Can you guarantee 100%this will not negatively impact us? Sincerely Chris Mavreas Page 265 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Bill Friedman <wf@fried mans.ca> Sent:April 7, 2020 4:53 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: 918 Line 3 South-Township of Oro-Zoning By-law 97-95, Draft Zoning By-law Amendment We represent the owner of 918 Line 3 South-Township of Oro. Section 3 b) of the proposed amending by-law states that an"Agricultural Use" does not included the "outdoor growing of Cannabis" and 3 c) states that a Specialized Agricultural Use does not include the outdoor growing of Cannabis.. The definition of Cannabis in the proposed by-law means any plant forum in or derived from a plant that belong to the genus Cannabis. Hemp appears to belong to the genus Cannabis. Accordingly the proposed Amendment to Zoning By-law 97-95 would prohibit growing hemp outdoors. Our client is strongly opposed to the amendment which prohibits the growing outdoors of Hemp. Minimum setbacks from sensitive land have been included in the amendment and this setback should be sufficient to deal with any concerns regarding odour of neighbouring land owners, assuming odour is an issue. Hemp and marijuana are, taxonomically speaking, the same plant; the difference is that hemp plants contain no more than 0.3 percent (by dry weight) of THC (tetrahydrocannabinol), the psychoactive substance found in marijuana. By comparison, marijuana typically contains 5 to 20 percent THC. You can't get high on hemp. Hemp has many potential uses. Hemp fibers can be used in textiles or industrial processes. Hemp can also be used for grain, and the flowers are often used as a source for cannabidiol, a hemp extract also known as CBD. CBD is widely acclaimed for use in addressing many aches,pains and mental disorders. However, there is little data supporting many of the claims. Hemp has been permitted in Canada since 1998 and is currently regulated by Health Canada under the Cannabis Act. Health Canada licenses the cultivation of hemp. There is no reason to prohibit outdoor growing of hemp assuming the grower has a license to do so. The prohibition of growing a plant on agricultural lands is in our view not within the jurisdiction of the municipality. Our client will vigorously oppose any by-law amendment which purports to restrict what plant can be grown on Agricultural Lands. Yours truly, William Friedman Barrister&Solicitor Page 266 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... R, JE ,t. A "VM VJJXM Friedman Law Professional Corporation 150 Ferrand Drive,Suite 802 Toronto,ON M3C 3E5 wf@friedmans.ca Tel: (416)496-3340 ext. 199 Fax: (416)497-3809 Friedman Law Professional Corporation Page 267 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Wilson Oneill <wilsononeill@gmail.com> Sent:April 7, 2020 4:53 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Cc: Planning<Planning@oro-medonte.ca> Subject:Amended Draft Cannabis By-law Submission To Mayor Hughes, Council Members and the Planning Department, My name is Wilson O'Neill and I live in Oro Medonte. I am an 18 year-old nationally ranked athlete in track and field sprint and long hurdles. I represented Canada last summer at the Pan Am Junior Games and I was on the trajectory to compete for Canada at the World U20 Championships this summer in Kenya. Due to Covid 19, this has been postponed until further notice. My ultimate goal is to compete for Canada in the Olympics. I wanted to express my appreciation for Oro-Medonte's draft by-law amendment that will restrict Cannabis Processing and Production facilities to Industrial and Economic Development lands. Training in Oro Medonte would not be a possibility for me if a cannabis facility was near my home. The smell would affect the air quality which could reflect in my performance. Water quality would also be a concern. Please do the right thing and designate appropriate lands for this business — they belong in industrial or economic development lands, and not on agricultural lands which are close to people's homes and communities. I support your amended by-law. Wilson O'Neill 1735 Ridge Road West Page 268 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... April 7, 2020 RE: Cannabis Production and Processing Facility Dear Council of the Township of Oro-Medonte, I am writing as a concerned citizen of Shanty Bay with respect to the Cannabis Production and Processing Facility. As a mother of 3 children, I am very concerned about the contamination of our environment as a result of a cannabis production and processing facility being located and built directly adjacent to both residential and Sensitive Lands and within close proximity to the shoreline of Lake Simcoe. I am extremely concerned about the risk to our drinking water and the resulting contamination, not only of our wells, but also of the surrounding land and Lake Simcoe where we like to swim. I have been so thankful for this area which values agriculture and has promoted the health and wellness of the families who live here. Now, I am worried that our health and wellness will be compromised by the water collection and use,the energy drawn to support a large operation, and the emissions resulting from the processing. What are the implications for our natural resources? How will this impact our local residential environment? Is there a plan for water usage that will keep our water potable and plentiful and our lake clean? The proposed and now imminent construction of the Cannabis production and processing facility is very unsettling as it is located in direct proximity to Sensitive Land use such as the Oro-Medonte Rail Trail, Shanty Bay Public School, Nursery School, St. Thomas Anglican Church and community parks. Cannabis needs extensive amounts of water. When grown indoors, it requires intense energy input.There is also evidence that cannabis emits substances that contribute to the breakdown air quality, which in turn directly impacts our health. I would like to be clear that I support the By-law No. 2020—Draft that will be presented at the April 7, 2020 council meeting.This kind of operation certainly does not belong on agricultural land. Our environment is fragile. Our water and air are essential resources in this community. Please consider and revisit the impact and the risks to the residents of our community. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Jenni Kilgour, a concerned citizen 21 Graham Street Oro-Medonte Page 269 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Cameron Gausby<cameron@kngtechnical.com> Sent:April 7, 2020 4:47 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Hemp Plant Oro To whom it May Concern, My family lives and works at 475 Line 2 South LOL 21-0. We DO NOT at all want this industry in our community. We object to this being legal morally but in addition to that we don't want: Increased traffic Pollution Environmental damage which we have already seen Noise pollution All of these things will potentially drive down our property values. The fact this thing could be this close also to our public school in Shanty Bay is also of deep concern. Respectfully, The Gausby Family 705.220.2268 Page 270 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From:Alastair Connolly<alastairconnollyl@gmail.com> Sent:April 7, 2020 4:46 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject:Zoning bylaw comments for Public Meeting,April 7th, 2020 From Alastair Connolly 15 Walnut Drive, Shanty Bay To the staff and council of the Township of Oro-Medonte. I thank and commend you for the proposed amendments to Bylaw 97-95, as they pertain to Cannabis Production and Processing Facilities. I believe ED and IR land is the appropriate place for such facilities,rather than A/RU. I would, in fact, urge you to consider strengthening the Special Provisions for Cannabis Production and Processing Facilities on IR and ED land. Specifically, I'd like to see a greater setback required from built-up residential areas. I note from Page 8 of the presentation, for example, there are both IR and ED land parcels in close proximity to the Procee Circle subdivision in Craighurst. Also, ED land close to Memorial Ave. subdivisions near Orillia. The concerns relating to these sorts of facilities are wide-ranging, including pollutions of noise, light and smell, as well as security and water table issues. These shouldn't be concerns foisted upon significant numbers of Township residents, by allowing such facilities to be constructed and operated near, in particular, multiple residential homes and schools. Many thanks for your consideration. Alastair Connolly Page 271 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... WEST ON CONSULTING planning + urban design VIA EMAIL April 7, 2020 File 9785 Township of Oro-Medonte 148 Line 7 South Oro-Medonte ON, 1_01. 2EO Attn: Mayor & Members of Council Re: Public Meeting Application 2019-ZBA-01 Cannabis Production & Processing Facilities 837 Line 7 South, Township of Oro-Medonte Weston Consulting is the planning consultant for Carmel Pharms Corp., the operator of a cannabis production and processing facility at 837 Line 7 South. We have become aware of the most recent draft zoning by-law amendment pertaining to the above application and we are concerned about the proposed amendment's negative impact on our client's existing operations and potential future expansion. Prior to further consideration and the passing of this proposed amendment, we request a meeting with Town Planning Staff it) order to discuss the amendment's impact on our client's operations and potential needed revisions. Please also provide us with notification of any future public consultation sessions and/or decisions regarding this matter. Yours truly, Weston Consulting Per: Hobert Walters KPL., MCIR RPP Associate C. Dustin Laren, Carmel Cannabis VaughanOffices 2(',)1 Mil 19, C)ntafio I I K5K8 T.905,738.8080 Toronto Office 268F3erk(-,1HyS1re;--�t, Fc)[o,to (Dritariot05AD5 �'A�6,640.9917 Page 272 of 1327r1�11111 F,905,738,6637 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From:Jorge Bartolo<jmbartolo59@gmail.com> Sent:April 9, 2020 2:10 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca>; Leigh, Andria <aleigh@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Comments Cannabis Bylaw Jorge Bartolo - Elvyn Crescent, Oro Station Comments after April 7, 2020 Public Meeting Re: By law to permit cannabis production and processing facilities within the Township of Oro-Medonte I do agree that the Township must better define and implement controls in order to allow the Safe and acceptable methods of Production and Processing facilities of Cannabis within the Township. The Bylaw must Provide protection for the Residents of the Township from all unacceptable Enviromental impacts, such as but not limited to noise, air &water quality, fumes, oder, transportation, light pollution etc.. I do not agree with trying to eliminate it from the Agriculture Zone as we would be contradicting the Federal Government's position, as well as the OMAFRA designations of where Cannabis can be Cultivated and Processed. This will only result in unnecessary costly Litigation where it will most likely result in our Bylaw being over turned. I somewhat agree with Wayne Lintack's, (I believe that was his Name)point of view as I heard during the Public meeting on YouTube. I too took some time and reviewed the November 2019 Meridian Report by Nick McDonald and also some of the Selwyn Draft Bylaws which he referred to. This has helped me come to my point of view on this issue. I have attached some links to the webpages and PDF documents, I would ask that all our councillors and the designated Township staff take the time to review this information, if you have not yet done so. In order to create a iron clad bylaw it would make more since to attempt to get all the Townships in Ontario to try and create bylaws that actually will work and that are as similar as possible so that it does not appear as if it's a"not in my backyard approach". One of the Main Issues with this Industry is that it does create meany unwanted issues to Residential properties and other Sensitive Land uses. In reality the ideal setback for this industry is anywhere from 500 metres to 1000 metres from any sensitive land use Properties as described presently by the Township of Oro-Medonte. This applies to all 3 zone classifications, A/RU, ED or IR Lands. Then within the other applicable Bylaws and codes, such as but not limited to, Zoning, Building, Enviromental, etc. Then the actual set backs to property lines could be defined to more reasonable distances such as ranges from a few metres to larger distances of 50 metres to 150 metres depending upon which feature it was referring to, Such as side yard, front yard and so on. This would be possible because the property would already be located a safe distance from any Sensitive Land Uses. Along with those Distance control attributes the following Items,but not limited too, must also be defined with control limits within there designated Bylaw or Code: Page 273 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... • Electricity Utility must be defined as capable of providing the necessary Feed type (single or 3 Phase) and volume (Voltage and Amperage) in order be able to operate the Business at 100% output for all functions. No Portable fixed installation of Power generation Equipment via Motorized sources. • Natural Gas Utility Pipe Size Feed or whether a Propane or other Fuel is allowed as alternate Source for Heating or alternate Power supply(electrical Generation). • Controls on co-power generation, stipulations on noise and other Enviromental Controls. • Limits on the use of Back-up Power generation to only be used in emergency or other power Supply outages. Limited to provide back-up to only heating systems, emergency lighting, ventilation, water &waste water and other controls. There by, preventing the use of portable generation as a main power supply mitigating the installation of Proper Utility supply systems which may require major upgrades. • Water Supply requirement regulations including requirement to or not to hook up to Municipal Systems if available or whether Provincial Ground Water draw limits Licence are part of continued operation. • Waste Water disposal criteria • Composite and Waste controls • Transportation impact, routes, possible hours of access • Noise mitigation, be it physical structures, or possible even Limits to time of day due to sounds traveling at night. • Also limits on overall Noise, oder, air quality produced during normal operation. Taking this kind of approach and allowing the Production and Processing facilities of Cannabis within the Township is a much better and sensible method, which will most likely be able to stand up to any LPAT or court challenges. Some of these companies have very deep pockets and there are very large pay backs once these places are up and running. Let's face it, it also does create employment and Tax revenue for the Township, they could and want to be a good corporate citizen. Even some of the Medical benefits are real. Taking this approach can also be the frame work for other potential Industries which can produce negative environmental issues. Having worked in Industry and having first Hand experience with mitigating Enviromental controls some of my comments come from direct experience. One Main issue with the presently proposed Bylaw is that most if not all the presently zoned A/RU, ED or IR Lands, back onto RI Zoned Properties, which are Less then 150 metres distance away. Most if not all the ED and IR lands are mostly occupied or too small to allow most operations to want to establish on existing lands. This would just cause more litigation and LPAT challenges as they would start applying for Zoning changes On A/RU lands in order to conform. Links to some Good and interesting Info below: Draft Official Plan of the County of Peterborough htt]2://www.selwyntownshil2.ca/en/townshi]2hall/resources/News---Publi c-Notice/15OP-19007--- S elwyn-Cannabis-OPA-5 8---DRAFT.pdf Link to Meridian Nick McDonald Report Nov. 5 - Regulating Cannabis in Selwyn Page 274 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... Township hgp://www.selwyntownship.ca/en/townshiphall/resources/News---Public-Notice/C- 01-19_Cannabis-Recommendation-Report.pdf Sent from my Wad Link to Considerations for regulating Cannabis Cultivation in Selwyn Township http://www.selwyntownship.ca/en/Modules/News/index.aspx?feedI d=&newsld=a92bdde7-6cd8-40c1-8e3f-03b00213148a Page 275 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From:Joy Levison <levisonlaw@on.aibn.com> Sent:April 9, 2020 4:08 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: RE: Automatic reply: Proposed draft by-law restricting Cannabis to Industrial zoning Mr.Todd Weatherall, I am preparing to make my final submissions regarding the proposed by-law, but am finding it difficult, as I am unable to see the responses previously received from stakeholder groups such as OMFRA, MOE, NVCA, Lake Simcoe Conservation Authority, Ministry of Natural Resources, County of Simcoe, and such other entities to whom Planning may have circulated the proposed draft by-law as amended for comment. Also, I do not see the subsequently received public comments,to which I might wish to respond. Kindly direct me to the location of these documents on your website,as I am certain they must be posted, and I do find the website, difficult if not impossible to navigate. I also note that in comparing the first, and second draft of the By-law to amend Zoning by-law 97-95 as amended ( Cannabis Processing and Production Facilities), specifically the amendments to Section 6, ( section 2 of the first draft amending by-law, and section 3 of the second amended draft), Definitions, that in the initial draft "Cannabis Production and Processing Facility' actually included the word PROCESSING in the definition,whereas in the amended Draft,the definition of Cannabis Production and Processing Facility, in the text OMITTED THE WORD PROCESSING from the definition. I am sure this is an oversight, however, I wish your confirmation that the by-law presented for consideration by council will include the missing word, otherwise the title is quite misleading. Also please confirm that the time for responding is 7 clear days, excluding Saturdays, Sundays and Statutory Holidays, as in normal Statutory interpretation of the word "days" Joy Levison 817 Line 2 South, Oro-Medonte Ontario LOL 2L0 Page 276 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Mitch Eisen <eisen@celaw.ca> Sent:April 9, 2020 9:11 AM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Cannabis Bylaw I watched and listened with interest the public meeting on April 7. There were many thoughtful comments from residents of the township. I had previously written in support of the suggested new bylaw. I continue to support the Townships efforts to limit the growing of marijuana and hemp to areas that do not impinge on the settlement communities within Oro. However, some of the comments have led me to write a further email supporting the strengthening of the bylaw. First, with respect to the definition of cannabis, why not add to the definition the phrase "and without limiting the generality of the foregoing, cannabis includes hemp". While it was suggested that the definition already would include hemp, if there is even the smallest chance that the definition might be interpreted not to include hemp, the addition I am suggesting will be clear, and there is no downside to including it. Second, as suggested by at least one of letter writers, an indoor grow operation should be specifically noted in the bylaw as being restricted to industrial/economic lands, again to avoid any misconception. Third, clearly the setbacks need to be considerably greater than the 150 metres presently suggested. I would suggest at least 750 metres, if not a full kilometer. This will have the desired effect of ensuring that those who live near industrial and economic lands have an appropriate buffer zone. It will also strengthen the goal of ensuring that should there be an appeal of the bylaw, even if it is found at the appeal level that marijuana grow ops can exist on agricultural land in Oro, there would still hopefully be protection for the communities living close by the agricultural land. Finally, while I understand that the provincial offences court is closed presently due to Covid 19, should it be correct that the property owners on the 3rd line have ignored a stop work order or are otherwise failing to comply with provincial offences laws/township bylaws, it seems to me that charges could at least be laid using the process of Section 23 (1.2) of the provincial offences act which allows Page 277 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... for an information to be sworn without the officer appearing in person with the Justice of the Peace. At least the ball would be rolling and the owners would be aware that there are consequenses to not following stop work orders or bylaws, should that indeed be happening. I hope and trust that the council will continue to provide support and guidance to its constituents in ensuring that our country way of life in Oro Medonte is not irreparably spoiled by allowing a marijuana or hemp production facility in the heart of one of its vibrant country communities. Mitchell Eisen 112 Bay Street, Shanty Bay Page 278 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Jeff Scott<jgffg,sccgt.t iroclketina:ill„coirn> To: Cathy Keane <cat1h. „Deane it r::::irnedoirn.te.,_ca> Sent: Friday, April 10, 2020, 11:07:49 AM EDT Subject: Hello Cathy , trusting this email finds all well with you and yours !! In reviewing the first and second draft by-laws, please review DEFINITION section 6 of the new by-law, under Cannabis Production and Processing Facility the wording is identical to the wording of the first draft with the save and except that the word "processing" has been omitted. Perhaps meaning processing is not governed by this by-law. Wondering if this could be an oversight as feelings are this is very important verbiage that has inadvertently been missed. Looking forward to your thoughts. Thank you Jeff Scott 26 red Oak Crescent Oro- Medonte Page 279 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Mike Gartner<mike@ntrcanada.com> Sent:April 10, 2020 3:41 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Comments on Public Meeting To Whom It May Concern, My wife Colleen and I have been taxpayers in Oro-Medonte for 35 years and have spent the last 6 years as full time residents in the village of Shanty Bay. This past Wednesday April 81"we spent close to 4 hours listening to the Public Meeting and hearing concerns expressed from the residents of Oro- Medonte. Not quite how we thought we would spend a quite evening, however it was of utmost importance to us. To say there was overwhelming support of the amended Cannibis by-law would be an understatement. I'm not sure how many letters Andrea read but having only 2 negative emails out of what must have been over a hundred, must give council and the Township planners encouragement that they are being very representative of their constituents. Most of the comments check all the boxes that are important to all of us. There were many residents and members of council who wanted to look at more stringent setbacks. I would agree with that approach. I also agree with the proposed by-law and the IR and ED zoning ONLY for Cannabis growth and Cannabis processing and production, and would encourage a unanimous vote to proceed. I support you now and I will support you if this goes through appeals and legal processes. Thank you for representation of our interests and the interests of all the residents of Oro-Medonte. Mike Gartner 1847 Ridge Road W Oro-Medonte, On LOL 2L0 rr�___Ike@intircanada.com ............... .......................................................................... Page 280 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Farida Jones<farida.jones@rogers.com> Sent:April 11, 2020 11:24 AM To: Weatherell,Todd <tweatherell@oro-medonte.ca>; Witlib, Derek<dwitlib@oro-medonte.ca>; Leigh, Andria <aleigh@oro-medonte.ca> Cc: . Council <Council@oro-medonte.ca>; Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Cannabis By-Law public meeting Hello Todd, Derek and Andria After watching the Public meeting and listening to comments, I re-read the amended draft Cannabis Production and Processing Facility By-Law and noticed that the new Definition of a Cannabis Production and Processing Facility does not include the word "Processing" as the first draft did. Please confirm that the final by-law will include Processing in the definition. Cathy Keane made an excellent observation that by limiting the by-law to only Health Canada Licensees, there exists a loophole which would allow combined medical Cannabis licenses to grow thousands of unregulated cannabis plants under one roof and the control of a sub-contractor. Perhaps you could add wording to the effect of "more than 4 plants for personal use will come under the definition for Cannabis Production and Processing Facility" I thought the inclusion of necessity for adequate electrical power without the use of generators important to include. I also suggest that a minimum of 300 metres from sensitive uses will protect residents and if it means half the Industrial Lands will not accommodate Cannabis, all the better for Oro-Medonte. Thank-you for your consideration. Fo,rrGo a, Jo*ve,y 1167 Line 2 South, Oro-Medonte LOL 2LO Page 281 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... To the Council of Oro-Medonte, Letter April 12, 2020—Pertaining to Cannabis Processing& Production Facilities. This letter is in reference to the bylaw amendment regarding Cannabis Processing and Production Facilities in Oro-Medonte. We have been residents of Shanty Bay for over seven years and have really enjoyed the quiet rural living. We offer our support in amending the current bylaw regarding setbacks to be increased to at least 500 meters from sensitive land designations. Cannabis Processing Facilities should be in areas zoned as industrial, away from sensitive areas— specifically(but not limited to) residential homes, schools, churches and parks. We're concerned about the operation of such a facility and the negative impact it will have on our environment. How is our existing water system supposed to support such a facility when it already struggles to meet the needs of our current population? The potential negative effects of their waste product leeching into our water table and ultimately Lake Simcoe. We're concerned about not only the odor emitted from the facility but also the toxins being emitted that will have a negative impact on our community's health and well being. As we understand, large generators and lights are used in the processing which could have a negative impact on our sleep, causing additional health side effects. Potential reduction in property values due to the operation of this type of facility is also a large concern. We are sure that other locations within Oro-Medonte would be more suitable for such an operation away from residents and sensitive areas. If there is not such a location, then maybe the council should reconsider and not approve any type of operation that reduces the quality of life for its residents. We are all neighbours and good neighbours would not knowingly negatively affect their neighbours. Finally, it is our understanding that another Cannabis Processing Facility has been approved in Oro- Medonte. Question: How many does council plan on allowing in our Township? Jon & Cheryl Irwin 7 Red Oak Cres. Oro-Medonte Page 282 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... Page 283 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Sandy Agnew<sagnew@ecomedic.ca> Sent:April 12, 2020 1:51 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Cannabis Draft Zoning By-law Amendment cannabis@oro-medonte.ca April 13, 2020 To Oro-Medonte Mayor and Council: Having watched the live streamed Public Meeting on April 7, 2020, 1 want to add my voice to the overwhelming majority of O-M residents who support changes to the zoning bylaw to restrict cannabis operations to IR an ED zoned lands. I also want to urge council to have the courage to take action against the flagrant violations of the site alteration bylaw on the farmland at 918 Line 3 South. Sandy Agnew, 1305 Scarlett Line, Oro-Medonte. Page 284 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: sue-ellen morrison <sueellenmorrison@yahoo.ca> Sent:April 13, 2020 3:41 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: permitting cannabis production and processing facilities within the Township of Oro-Medonte Importance-high Hello, As almost 20 year residents of Oro-Medonte specifically the area known as Shanty Bay, we have grave concerns regarding the development of a cannabis production facility within our community. We want to be clear that we are against and object to the establishment of such a facility or operation that is involved in the production and/or processing of cannabis now or in the future due to the negative impact it WILL have on the community long term through quality of life, residents health and well being as well as property values The site that runs along the community walking trail from Line 2 S-Line 3 S above Ridge Road is located in a community of private homes with both elementary and nursery schools as well as a church and outdoor play areas all in the immediate vicinity not to mention close to Lake Simcoe. These areas will be negatively impacted through noxious smell, significant water use, light pollution,traffic, noise and safety. This is a residential community and this production does not belong here! The initial draft of the amendment stated "cannabis production and Processing facility' however the amended bylaw does not include "processing" It is critical that "processing" be put back into the amended bylaw. Further, prohibiting indoor growth of cannabis on agricultural lands needs to be added to the amended bylaw. At a critical time such as this when everyone is concerned about the impact of Covid 19 I commend council for their stance of saving agricultural land for food production. Rezoning of any agricultural land should only be approved after extensive research regarding the use and significant input from the Community at large before any changes are made. We ask that you stop this production and protect our residential community from its like in the future. Sincerely, David & Sue-Ellen Morrison 4 Martine Cres Oro-Medonte, On LOL 2L0 Page 285 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... To Whom it May Concern: My name is Karen Sanderson. My husband, Mery Sanderson and I have lived at 54 Raikes Street in Shanty Bay village since 1974. 1 was out of the country when the concerns were first raised regarding the lands between the 2nd and 3rd lines of Oro Medonte and the possibility that these agriculturally zoned properties could be used for a cannabis operation. I did listen to the meeting which took place on April 7t" and agree with all of the comments that were made in the letters received from township residents. I am in support of a by law, which will effectively control what can happen on any large property, which is zoned agricultural use. In my mind, there is no justification at all for allowing a cannabis processing facility anywhere in this township. No matter where they are located there will be similar concerns to those being raised by Shanty Bay residents. I am sure that council is very aware that they have a huge burden of responsibility to the residents of this beautiful township. It is imperative that the deliberations concerning the new wording for this bylaw cover all eventualities. Councillor Keane brought up various points about possible" backdoor loopholes" that could be used to circumvent the intent as set out in the current, proposed by law. It appears inevitable that an appeal will be forthcoming so I trust that every effort will be made to make this by law iron clad so that any appeal will result in the same answer .... A cannabis processing facility or the growing of hemp/cannabis cannot be permitted on agriculturally zoned land. Respectfully submitted, Karen and Mery Sanderson 705 -722 0467 Page 286 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: B D<ravensbrookl@gmail.com> Sent:April 13, 2020 11:00 AM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Cc: Keane, Cathy<cathy.keane@oro-medonte.ca> Subject:Zoning By-law Amendment 2019-ZBA-01 Cannabis Production and Processing Facilities - Comments and Feedback Date: April 13, 2020 Ref Zoning By-law Amendment 2019-ZBA-01 Cannabis Production and Processing Facilities - Comments and Feedback To: The Township of Oro-Medonte As a resident of Shanty Bay I would like to provide comment on the proposed Cannabis Township by-law. I disagree with the proposed Cannabis zoning by-law as it does not in my opinion address serious potential problems in the community. These problems are outlined in the following points below: 1. Noise Pollution.Noise pollution created by such a production facility such as the low/high noise frequency of fans and pumps operating in such a facility. Noise pollution should not be allowed and can be a major community and health consideration in such a proposed by-law 2. Water Usage. Water usage limits should be applied to such a production facility and should have no impact on the community water needs. 3. Waste Production. Proposed Cannabis production facilities should not be able to dump phosphorous waste into the township water table, lakes, rivers, streams or waste systems. Lake Simcoe is already struggling with elevated phosphorous pollution levels in the lake and Cannabis production facilities pose a threat to the eco-system of the lake. 4. Tree Destruction. Destruction of existing large hardwood trees should not be allowed in preparing a site for a Cannabis production facility. The current destruction and removal of large mature hardwood trees along Line 2 and the Rail Trail corridor in Shanty Bay for the current developing Cannabis facility in the Township is not only a visible blight upon the community but has eroded the community character and environmental aspects of the village of Shanty Bay. 5. Minimum Lot Area. The minimum size footprint for a Cannabis production facility is much too small in my opinion and will impede upon the living conditions of residential neighbours near production facilities. The proposed minimum lot area of 0.4 hectares is much too small and the minimum should be at least 4.0 hectares. 0.4 hectares could potentially place a Cannabis production facility right beside an existing residential unit. 6. Increased Traffic. A production facility will undoubtedly increase large vehicle traffic such as large machinery and delivery trucks on a frequent basis in a neighbourhood. This will not only lower property values but greatly increase wear on the local transport system and roads. Limits Page 287 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... such as limited delivery/pickup operating hours and schedules need to be implemented on commercial traffic operating at such a production facility. 7. Zoning. In my opinion Agricultural/Rural Use (AR/RU) zoning should prohibit any and all Cannabis production development. AR/RU zoning is intended for legitimate and traditional agricultural use not for industrial production of Cannabis products. Overall, I do not support the development of Cannabis production facilities in the Township and I would like my opinions stated above considered in any by-law amendments and/or decisions in regard to this subject. Submitted by residents: Mr. and Mrs. Brown 30 Red Oak Crescent, Oro-Medonte, ON Page 288 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Manuel Cisneros<manuelcisnerosleyva@gmail.com> Sent:April 13, 2020 3:54 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Cc: Hughes, Harry<harry.hughes@oro-medonte.ca>; Hough, Ralph <ralph.hough@oro-medonte.ca>; Veitch, Ian <ian.veitch@oro-medonte.ca>; DeSousa,Tammy<tammy.desousa@oro-medonte.ca>; Keane, Cathy<cathy.keane@oro-medonte.ca>; Scott, Shawn <shawn.scott@oro-medonte.ca>; Greenlaw, Randy<randy.greenlaw@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Draft Cannabis By-Law To: Members of Council and Planning Staff I have children that attend Shanty Bay Public School and I am concerned with what is happening in Shanty Bay. The Federation of Canadian Municipalities recommend municipalities consult their provincial enabling land use laws for specific direction but that there is no obligation for municipalities to permit cannabis cultivation. In reading your draft by-law I agree with the approach planning staff are taking only permitting cannabis activity in certain zoned areas. Almost all cultivation licence holders apply for processing licences and it is the next step in obtaining a comprehensive establishment that can grow. process, sale, and ship product. The only other suggestion I have for your by-law or whenever there is consideration for set backs to sensitive areas is that the rail trail is considered. The rail trail is a public trail that is frequented by children of all ages and it should be listed as a sensitive area. Thank you for your consideration Regards, Mr. &Mrs. Cisneros 38 Barrie Terrace Oro-Medonte L4M7E2 Page 289 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: John Thompson <jjshantybay@aol.com> Sent: April 14, 2020 7:58 PM To: Cannabis <Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Action To whom it may concern What needs to happen is an injunction. Why can the developer keep working on the site without a permit H Jane Thompson 1935 Ridge Road West Oro Medonte Page 290 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: lynnbury@rogers.com <lynnbury@rogers.com> Sent: April 14, 2020 12:56 PM To: Cannabis <Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Cc: Hughes, Harry <harry.hughes@oro-medonte.ca>; Hough, Ralph <ralph.hough@oro-medonte.ca>; Veitch, Ian <ian.ve itch @oro-medonte.ca>; DeSousa, Tammy <tarnmy.desousa@oro-medonte.ca>; Keane, Cathy <cathy.keane@oro- medonte.ca>; Greenlaw, Randy <randy.greenlaw@oro-medonte.ca>; doug.shipley@parl.gc.ca; doug.downey@pc.ola.org Subject: Cannabis Production Facility Mayor and Council Members, We are writing to the council to strongly express our concerns regarding the planning of a cannabis plant located between the second and third lines in Oro Medonte. We have been residents in Oro Medonte Township for over 35 years with the last 10 years in the Shanty Bay area. We chose to live in this area because of its rural appeal, lack of congestion, minimal pollution, clean water, and natural and peaceful surroundings. Our concerns relate to the disruption of this lifestyle by the development of the cannabis plant in our neighborhood. We specifically cite the impact of this development on: Clean ground water. Water run off to Lake Simcoe and resultant damage to the environment. Increase in commercial traffic, noise, odour and lighting in the area. We question the rationale of allowing this development in an area so close to the Shanty Bay community, the school and Lake Simcoe. If allowed to proceed we are also likely to experience negative pressure on our home values. We also question why the Township has allowed the owners to develop the site so substantially, removing hundreds of trees and altering the landscape to such an extreme, without the community's involvement and acceptance. We ask the council to stop the development, involve the community, and consider it to be relocated to an area with far less negative impact. Sincerely, Tom and Lynn Bury 105 Brambel Rd Shanty Bay,ON LOL 21-0 Page 291 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... 1775 Ridge Road West Oro Medonte LOL 21-0 April 14, 2020 Mr. Todd Weatherall, Intermediate Planner Planning Department Township of Oro Medonte 148 Line 7 South Oro Medonte LOL 2E0 Dear Mr. Weatherall, Proposed Draft Zoning Bylaw To Regulate Cannabis Production and Processing Facilities In Township of Oro- Medonte We are the registered owners of 1775 Ridge Road West in the Township of Oro- Medonte. We have made a considerable investment in this property and enjoy the peaceful lakeside setting in the Township. We are writing to express our support of the proposed zoning by law to regulate cannabis production and processing facilities in the Township. We support Councils intent to restrict their locations to the industrial zones and to provide further restrictions in terms of setbacks,etc. We are very concerned about the impacts that cannabis facilities would have in proximity to residential communities, schools etc with respect to odour, noise from generators and the impact to water quality. Runoff from higher lands comes towards the lake and can impact our drinking water and we have concerns regarding a large water user like a cannabis operator on our well. We understand that there is a cannabis operation on the 71" line and understand the neighbours have expressed concerns regarding noise and odour. We believe that cannabis operations are much more suited to industrial lands where they can be situated around other manufacturing and processing uses and the impacts can be better controlled and managed. Thank you for your consideration. Regards, 4lG1 1876571 Ontario Inc. Page 292 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From:ANGELA BALDWIN <angela.baldwin@rogers.com> Sent:April 14, 2020 3:33 PM To: Weatherell,Todd <tweatherell@oro-medonte.ca>; Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Cc:Jennifer O'Neill <jennistyle@gmail.com> Subject: draft cannabis bylaw Hi Todd, Attached is a letter with comments on the Township's draft cannabis bylaw on behalf of Jason and Jen O'Neill. They submitted a letter with their general comments last week and thought they had attached my technical review but I could not tell if it was included as it was not read aloud at the public meeting last week. I have updated my letter so could you please include the attached letter as part of the formal comments on the bylaw. thank you for your assistance Regards, Angela Baldwin, MCIP, RPP Principal Baldwin Planning and Development Consultants 3 Barrie Terrace Barrie , Ontario 1-41VI 1 E8 Tel.& Fax. (705) 739-0071 Cell (416) 578-3297 Page 293 of 327 otice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo 0614�1 n, gnu X,e,.?,.,Mq N� 3 Barrie Terrace, Barrie, ON L4M 1 E8 I cd Rx Fix, (705)739-0071 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS angelabaldwin@rogers,com C'cH (416)578-3297 April 13, 2020 Mr. Derek Witlib Manager of Planning Services Planning Department Township of Oro Meclonte 148 Line 7 South Oro Medonte LOL 2EO Dear Derek, Proposed Draft Zoning Bylaw To Regulate Cannabis Production and Processing Facilities In Township of Oro-Medonte We have reviewed the draft zoning by law to regulate cannabis production and processing facilities on behalf of Jennifer and Jason O'Neill who reside at 1735 Ridge Road West. They have lived in the community for four years and are keenly interested in the draft cannabis bylaw. They are supportive of Council's intent to restrict the location of cannabis operations and to provide restrictions for their use. While the Federal Government is responsible for administering Canada's cannabis production licensing, municipalities have authority over land use regulation and have the power to prohibit and regulate land uses though zoning bylaws. We support the municipalities' intent to restrict cannabis production and processing facilities to the Rural Industrial (IR) and Economic Development(ED) zones which are generally better separated from residential uses and where the impacts such as noise, dust,odour, traffic and outdoor illumination can be regulated under site plan control and to specify that and Agricultural Use or Specialized Agricultural Use does not include a Cannabis production and processing facility. Cannabis operations can cause significant impacts on residential and other sensitive uses such as noxious odours, security fencing which is dangerous to wildlife,the use of intensive fertilizers which could lead to increased run off and pollution problems. They are intense uses which are much better suited in the industrial zones where they can be subject to site plan control to address mitigation of impacts, buffering and screening and waste management control. We provide the following specific comments on the draft bylaw for your consideration: 1. Section 3 a) Add the words "or hemp'after "'Cannabis"such that it reads: Page 294 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo "Cannabis Means a plant or any part thereof found in or derived from such a plant that belongs to the genus Cannabis or hemp" 2. Section 3 a)" Cannabis Production and Processing Facility" definition: Add the words"lands" between "any" and Building"on the first line of the definition and add the words, "process, store and test" after the words, destroy on the second line of the definition and change the word "an"to "in"on the 3"' line of the definition such that it would read: "Means any lands, building or structure, licensed and authorized by Health Canada to ship, deliver, transport,destroy,process,store, test, grow, dry,export and/or import cannabis for medical or non medical purposes, including related research as defined in applicable Federal Regulation,as amended from time to time," 2. Section 3b) Add the words "or hemp"at the end of the section so that it reads; "An Agricultural Use does not include a Cannabis Production and Processing Facility or the outdoor growing of Cannabis or hemp." 4. Section 3c) Adding the words "storage or production"after the words "outdoor growing"on line three of this section and the words"or hemp" after the words "Cannabis" at the end of the section such that it reads: "A Specialized Agricultural Use"does not include a Cannabis Production and Processing Facility or the use of outdoor growing,storage or production of Cannabis or Hemp': Add a new Section 4 after Section 3 which reads: "all development in relation to the establishment of or expansion to a Cannabis Production and Processing Facility shall be subject to site plan control". We thank you for your consideration of these amendments of the bylaw. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or require additional information. Regards, Angela Baldwin, MCIP, RPP c.c.Jennifer O'Neill Page 295 of 327 .............. .............. .......... . .............. ................ . ......... 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amend � , t the Zo... ORGANIBIS April 14, 2020 Sent via email Township of Oro-Medonte 148 Line &South Oro-Medonte, ON. LOL 2E0 Dear Sir/Madam: RE: Feedback on proposed Draft Cannabis Zoning By-Law This is our second submission to the Draft Cannabis Zoning By-Law that was originally submitted on or about January 31, 2020. 10982377 Canada Inc. (also known as Organibis Inc.) being the owner of 250 Ridge Road West in Oro-Medonte is strongly opposed to the former and the new zoning by law that planning staff are considering. Considering the history of the owner's plans, proposed use and development that has been submitted to planning staff in complete satisfaction of all site plan requirements the Owner expects that any new proposed Cannabis zoning by-law would not apply to the Owner as it has been working with planning staff for the last two and half years to satisfy all site plan requirements imposed by the Town. The Owner has made significant financial investments in the community and has incurred more than half a million dollars in costs working alongside planning staff to satisfy site plan requirements and abruptly ending that right to complete its development after approving it on more than one occasion would create substantial losses in the millions of dollars to the Owner. The Owner was granted an exception to the Interim Control By-Law known as ICB 2018-109 to allow it to continue its development and the Owner expects a similar exception to be granted that will enable the Owner to continue its development and investments in the community. The Owner intends to provide substantial employment opportunities to community members not only when it becomes operational but also during the construction phase.The Owner forecasts that it will employ approximately 1100 contractors during the development phase, and eventually the Owner intends to employ 180-220 employees once it is fully operational. Much of the development work is already underway which has already created many employment opportunities for community members. The Owner intends to be meaningful contributors in the community and will make every effort to ensure there is minimal disruption to neighbours and the community as a whole. We trust that planning staff and council will make the right decision that will permit our development to move forward as we are certain it was not planning staff's intention nor council's intention to end the Owner's development and restrict its intended use after carving out an exception to the ICB 2018-109 less than 12 months ago causing the Owner to invest further in the community to satisfy site plan requirements. Yours truly, Owner Inc. �a 4f Bobby Vakili 7620 Yonge Street,Suite 200,Thornhill ON L4J 1V9 +1 416 903 0441 info@organibis.ca Page 296 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From:Andrea Martin <narocroc@rogers.com> Sent:April 14, 2020 2:06 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Cannabis By-Law Amendment To:c inng_bi . oro irnedonte„ca;,nll inirniir�.g oiro medonte„ca Subject: Amendment to the Township's Comprehensive Zoning By-law 97, Application 2019ZBA-01, Cannabis Production and Processing Facilities Dear Oro-Medonte Planning Department, Town Council, and Mayor Hughes, Our names are Andrea and Carl Martin and we have lived in Oro—Medonte for 14 years. Like many residents in Oro-Medonte we have decided to make this township our home, hopefully for a life-time, and have enjoyed many of the benefits to living in a township that values their residents, green spaces, farming, and the sense of community. We have a particular interest in regards to what is happening at 918 Line 3 South between Line 2 and Line 3 as we back onto the trail and this 'hemp' cannabis farm will be essentially be in our back yard. I know that this will not have a dramatic effect on residents who don't have this popping up in their back yards, it will not be affecting their water table, they will not be affected by the increase in heavy equipment running, they will not be affected by the increased crime in their community, and it will not affect their community spirit. It is our belief that our quality of life will be affected. If the right provisions are not in place this could be in your back yard. A crop that requires high fencing, security, excessive water consumption and disturbs residents' quality of life with a pervasive odour, excessive noise, and artificial lighting, does not belong on lands that are close to residential settings. It belongs on an industrial land. From what we have heard and seen outside of Oro-Station we do not feel the township can regulate, manage and hold the companies accountable to their word when they say lighting, odour, noise, etc. will not occur. We are concerned that council will not be able to stop this even if they wanted to. Limiting location, how many acres, and rezoning can prevent them from popping up nears schools, churches, residential communities, and of course Lake Simcoe. In addition, if a company goes ahead with alterations (as seen on Line 3)without following the by-law of our township (By-law 2016-056 Section 9.0—Orders and Section 10.0- Offences) before applying for permits, why would we as residents feel they will follow whatever amendments are made in this draft by-law or any laws put in place thereafter. The use of the word 'or' in the following draft when referring to "growing of cannabis or hemp" as stated in Section 2(b)and 2(c) etc. is ambiguous as hemp falls under the genus cannabis. Is the municipality specifically separating cannabis as marihuana? We would like to see this document amended to add that approval has to be met by the Ministry of Environment, the Nottawasaga Conservation Authority, and the Lake Simcoe Protection Act before permits are allocated. Page 297 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... Thank you for your efforts in making the required amendments to the cannabis by-law to ensure it would prohibit cannabis, including hemp, in all agriculture zones in Oro-Medonte. Thank you for your leadership. Best regards, Carl and Andrea Martin Page 298 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... West Oro Ratepayers' Association P.O. Box '121., Ors,,Ontario I..OL 2XO April 14, 2020 Mayor Harry Hughes Deputy Mayor Ralph Hough Councillor Ian Veitch Councillor Tammy DeSousa Councillor Cathy Keane Councillor Shawn Scott Councillor Randy Greenlaw Chief Administrative Officer Robin Dunn Township of Oro-Medonte, 148 Line 7 South, Oro-Medonte, ON. LOL 2EO Dear Mayor, Deputy Mayor, Councillors and Chief Administrative Officer: RE: Cannabis Production and Processing Facilities in the Township of Oro-Medonte: We write to you today to provide our support with regards to the proposed Amendment to the Zoning By-law under Application 2019-ZBA-01. Based on our review of the current temporary By-Law which is due to expire in June 2020,we are pleased to see that you are proposing to put in place a permanent By-law that will continue to restrict Cannabis Production and Processing Facilities in Oro-Medonte only on lands zoned Industrial and Economic Development. We support the proposed enhancements to the By-law which builds on the restrictions that are in place under the current Temporary By-law. Our organization congratulates you on this work and it is re-assuring to know that this matter has received your attention and you have acted accordingly to continue this restriction by making the By-law permanent. Council should also take comfort in the tremendous support that you received from the numerous residents of Oro-Medonte at the recent 'virtual'Public Meeting, held on April 7, 2020.This is a sure sign that your proposed amendment to this By-law is the right thing to do. We understand that today is the last day input and feedback from Township residents will be accepted and, as with our letter,we hope additional support for your actions will be received. Once public input and feedback closes, and Council has an opportunity to review further, we hope you will move in favour of adopting the amendments and making this By-law permanent when you vote on April 29, 2020. Page 299 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... West Oro Ratepayers' Association P.O. Box '121., Ors,,Ontario L.OL 2XO There is a critical question that Council needs to address, namely the lack of enforcement. To be specific, why has no Stop Order been issued to date to the owner of 918—Concession 3, Oro-Medonte, for clearing and developing this property without permits? It appears clear to us that something should have been done, and can still be done,to rectify the situation. Had any other resident in the Township proceeded to the extent this owner has in clearing and developing their property without permits, we are certain they would have been shut down immediately, so why is this not the case here? We encourage you to act immediately and issue a Stop Order to prevent any further action on this property, not so much from a By-law violation perspective, which clearly both the temporary By-law as well as the amended By-law certainly support, but more importantly from a permit violation perspective. It is our understanding that even during the current Covid -19 pandemic, enforcement and action can still be filed by e- mail while recognizing that they may not be heard by the courts until the courts re-open. Council has both policy and the law on its side to take this important action. Perhaps even more importantly, Council has very strong support from many of their constituents to take this action. Council certainly must also recognize some of the comments made by numerous residents alluding to their right to the quiet enjoyment of their property and the significant property devaluation that they will continue to experience. I am afraid that this could open the Township up to legal action against it by its own residents for inaction. Please do the right thing, invoke your mandate and uphold the by-laws and policies of the Township. In summary,we support your work in amending this zoning by-law and encourage you to vote to implement it permanently on April 291". We also urge Council to take firm 'Stop Order'action against this owner to halt the continuous illegal work and development taking place on this property. Thank you for the opportunity to provide this input. Yours truly, t). Domenic Natale President, West Oro Ratepayers Association Page 300 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Gerry johnson <colorimage@sympatico.ca> Sent:April 14, 2020 6:07 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Cc: Keane, Cathy<cathy.keane@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Fwd: Proposed amendments to Oro-Medonte Bylaw 97-95 To: Mayor Hughes and members of Council. I would first like to commend you on your efforts to date concerning this matter and for the contribution of all involved to address the concerns and comments from many of your constituents. It is obvious there is a groundswell from numerous residents and sincerely trust that our collective voices have been duly recorded and the necessary actions will be enacted and enforced. I am writing to ensure you are aware the letter I wrote was NOT read as part of the April 7,2020 Public Meeting. As per the correspondence (below) I received back on April 5/20 from both Mayor Hughes and Councilor Keane acknowledging receipt as having been read. Thus, I can only presume this was unintentionally omitted to be read out by Andrea Lee as part of last nights' proceedings. (she merely read out My name and stated ... please find attached letter). With this, I would like to ensure it is entered and recorded as part of the April 71h Public Meeting. In addition, you indicated "A complete list of communications received between March 181h and April 14`h will be included in the public meeting minutes." To which I request confirmation that my Letter dated March 18/20 (that also was not read out last night), has or will be included in the minutes. For the record, understanding that this may now be a duplication, please see the following Letters Dated April 5/20 as well as my March 18/2020 letter to Oro-Medonte Council. A. April 5, 2020 Letter as follows; To: The Township of Oro-Medonte Council—letter sent via email on April 5,2020 to: cc:c u_in i.11..@a�_r�a..-rm�� rnt�.::�q.; I��_riry..lh_�u.�hesC�oro-irmedoinr�e„ca From: Gerry Johnson—61 Red Oak Crescent, Oro-Medonte, ON LOL 21-0 Subject: Proposed amendment to Oro-Medonte Zoning Bylaw 97-95. I, Gerry Johnson, residing at 61 Red Oak Crescent, since 2004, do herby support the proposed amendments to Oro-Medonte's Zoning By-Law 97-95; to ensure it will permit Cannabis related growing and processing of Cannabis and Hemp activities in IR and ED Zones ONLY. With reference the attached "Municipal Guide to Cannabis Legalization"—roadmap for Canadian local governments, by the Federation of Canadian Municipalities-Spring 2018. Page 301 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... Which presumably Council used with Legal advice to assist in drafting By-Law 97-95 and the proposed amendments, as it relates to zoning, density, location, licensing, noise/odours, enforcement, and Municipal cost considerations relating to local policing and infrastructure. It states in "Section 2—Land use management"— "Local governments are entitled to interpret enabling legislation broadly enough to address emerging issues and respond effectively to community objectives" .... "to deal with particular use on a conditional use or direct control basis"and"most zoning bylaws are designed to prohibit land use in particular zones"... it states, "for clarit some bylaws also contain a list explicitly forbidding specific land use such as; "restricting the cultivation of cannabis on agricultural lands,AND setting a Minimum Separation(ie:5 KM)from Sensitive Land Use". I suggest up to 5 km, which is the distance odours and sounds have been observed and reported in other jurisdictions. I also suggest adding the word ONLY at the end of"Section 3.0 Table A3'.Thus, adding clarity to the wording, restricting development in ALL agricultural (A/RU) zones within Oro-Medonte. Additionally, I have concerns relating to the timing from when the land was purchased and enactment of By-Law amendments. Obviously,the owners of the subject land (918— Line 3), acquired it with the sole intent of Cannabis production, under the premise that it would be permitted under Federal guidelines for Agricultural land use. With this, and the confirmation from Council (Mar.18/20), that NO formal application had yet been received, I propose added wording to the effect; "any firm or individual that has not made a formal application for development of a Cannabis/Hemp growing or processing facility as of(Dec.12/18) and has been approved by Health Canada and Council, will be limited to considerations for land use on Industrial or Economic Development lands ONLY within the Township of Oro-Medonte. 1 appreciate Councils efforts and trust you will take the above comments with due consideration. Respectfully, Gerry Johnson. B. March 18,2020 Letter as follows; SUBJECT: CANNABIS PRODUCTION FACILITY IN SHANTY BAY To:All Concerned Municipal Representatives of the Township of Oro-Medonte, Provincial and Federal members of Parliament Having just recently returned from an extended trip,we have only just learned about the proposed Cannabis Production Facility in Shanty Bay. From what I have heard and read of similar situations in other jurisdictions this matter is of great concern and potential to have grave consequences for the community and entire township. I would like to take this opportunity to outline some concerns that undoubtedly apply to all concerned and involved citizens of this fine community. • we understand that other surrounding municipalities have restricted Cannabis production and processing facilities to industrial zones. Is this not a prerequisite that Oro-Medonte can enact or amend in its' by-laws? There is no valid reason for a facility of this nature to be adjacent to residential neighborhoods!! • Will this potentially lead to further such facilities spouting up elsewhere in Oro. (in proximity to other Residential neighborhoods). Page 302 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... • We understand there is already another facility by the 7th line that has been receiving considerable complaints from the local community. Has the Oro administration not heard their voices and learned from this first-hand., Here and now, measures should be enacted to ensure this does not to become a recurring nightmare for constituents throughout Oro- Medonte. • Mature trees have already been clear cut or dug out of the ground as though this is already a done deal! Land is being excavated and we understand that wells are also being dug/drilled. Invariably,a facility of this magnitude and its demand for water will place an enormous strain on the water table, local wells, Lake Simcoe ecosystem and potentially the already challenged Shanty Bay residential water supply.At the very least an environmental impact study should be commissioned and performed immediately. • Similar Cannabis facilities in other jurisdictions are already known to emit; - strong/intense (skunk like) eye-watering stench, 24/7 and affecting up to a S-kilometer area. Preventing neighbors from being able to open windows in the warmer months.Sleep deprivation and anxiety. Not only are these odors offensive, more-so debilitating to those with respiratory complications and allergies,as well as involuntary exposure to chemicals for infants thru to the elderly. Reportedly,these emissions have also resulted in residents having to curtail outdoor activities. - Most of us in this community chose to live here for the benefits of clean air and country living,which will be unduly compromised should this facility proceed. -light pollution; (with operations requiring continuous or peak period lighting).This will greatly impact residents in the vicinity,as well as affect wildlife habitat, especially nocturnal! -noise pollution emitted by constant rattle/hum of commercial grade generators, an influx of vehicles/trucks resulting in increased road traffic as well through the community. (reported to be up to a 10-fold increase in similar situations). • What is of interest and contradictory, is that Oro-Medonte opted out of permitting retail cannabis locations.Yet, appears to condone and enable facilities of this nature to produce these controversial products in our backyard;especially within close proximity to schools, playgrounds, parks, churches and quiet residential neighborhoods! Note:there is a nearby elementary school where children will be exposed to a daily dose of whatever emissions can be expected from this complex. • A facility of this nature can create a cartel like atmosphere with high level of security,which would include the likes of high perimeter(prison style)fencing, elevated and high-powered lighting and potentially armed security. (high powered rifles). • It has been reported and feared in other locales that with this nature of product it can also attract an increased risk of crime and unwelcome intruders. Reports of intimidation and bully by the proprietors. Again, is this something we'd want to have adjacent to quiet and presently SAFE residential neighborhoods where families are bringing up their children. Or, even to make us think twice about walking on the adjacent Oro-Med trail! You are our'elected' leaders in the community,and we as homeowners; law abiding,tax paying citizens, entrust and rely on you for strong leadership at this critical time. Or will we and our families merely be collateral damage in the various governments collective quests to bring in any form of additional tax base? Page 303 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... Short of Legal action, our first line of defense against unwanted intruders being permitted to set up in our community rests within your ability to take the correct measures NOW in our mutual best interest. In the long term, it is questionable whether Oro-Medonte will attain any benefit from this. Is the firm representing this endeavor contribution in any way to local infrastructure, roads and/or the new firehall? Residential property values are surely to be devalued,which by rights should result in lower property assessments and thus reduced applicable residential taxation. We have also heard of properties currently on the market that have had prospective buyers turn away upon hearing or learning about the propose Cannabis Facility. With this, it is conceivable that anyone presently or considering selling their homes will have a very difficult time, short of drastically lowering the listing price and losing out on their hard-earned investments! Further-more,who in their right mind would even consider moving to an area with the prospect of this in their backyard! We urge you to give this matter your utmost consideration before enacting any bylaws permitting this travesty to proceed. I have read and recognize that the Federal Government has not thought the implications of allowing large Cannabis Operations to set up within municipalities and has downloaded the responsibility to the local level. At the very least,zoning regulations and restrictions need to be in place and enforced to ensure facilities of this nature are FAR from any residential neighborhoods. THUS,THE FUTURE WELL BEING OF THE RESIDENTS OF SHANTY BAY&ORO-MEDONTE LIES IN YOUR HANDS! Respectfully, Gerry Johnson From: Hughes, Harry<h _rrIhoesC�oro medonte.ca> Sent: Sunday, April 05, 2020 5:22 PM To: Gerry Johnson <ccollr o orrra. e�.syinnl�atico.ca> Subject: RE: Proposed Amendment to Oro-Medonte Zoning Bylaw 97-95 Hello Gerry I am acknowledging receipt of your communications with the added note of a special thank you for your research and providing comments directly relating to the wording of the By-Law. Mayor Harry Hughes From: Gerry Johnson «QJ2.rur age s�m..._a :i_ _. a.> Sent:April 5, 2020 11:45 AM To: Cannabis<parr_rr_ _It�u,s.e�_oro.-_medo_inte.o_�a,>; . Council <Co_�uncil..t _g.rp.:.:u�u_��a_u�.��.o_�a,>; Hughes, Harry Page 304 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... <harry.._hu heh .. .gaUco:::_rru ��,��> ............................. Subject: Proposed Amendment to Oro-Medonte Zoning Bylaw 97-95 Dear, Members of Oro-Medonte Council. In response to your notification of March 31,2020 concerning By-law No. 2020-Draft. Please find attached letter dated April 5, 2020 pertaining to the Proposed Amendment to Oro-Medonte Zoning Bylaw 97-95. Along with a copy referencing the "Municipal Guide to Cannabis Legalization" issued by the Federation of Canadian Municipalities—Spring 2018. (which I assume you a familiar with). Please do not hesitate to contact me should you require any further information or clarification. Respectfully, Gerry Johnson Page 305 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: G. Pears<pearsgc@gmail.com> Sent:April 14, 2020 3:04 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca>; Keane, Cathy<cathy.keane@oro-medonte.ca>; Planning <Planning@oro-medonte.ca> Subject:ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT 2019-ZBA-01 April 13,2020 Greg& Catherine Pears 54 Bay St. Oro Medonte, LOL 21-0 To: Oro Medonte Planning Department,Town Council, & Mayor Hughes We are writing this letter in follow up to the Apr 7/20 meeting held to discuss the zoning amendment. Thank you for your leadership on this issue to protect our township. After listening to the letters written in by so many concerned citizens, and hearing the questions and comments of the ward councilors, it was great to hear the overwhelming consensus is to move forward with the amendment once a few adjustments are made. We were encouraged to hear councilors feedback that there should be a greater setback than 150m in the industrial zone. We were very interested to hear the comments made by H&H Law stating the very real legal issues and concerns for a 150m setback, and recommendation it be substantially increased. We would like a minimum of 500m or even higher even if(as it was pointed out) an increase of this size would mean fewer spaces in the industrial zone for Cannabis Processing. Preserving space for these places is less a priority then preserving the health, safety, air, water and quality of life of those in our community. Secondly, we want to draw attention to, and support the comments made by Councilor Keane regarding the very real need to find a way to word this document so that those greenhouse operators, outdoor growers, or operators who are trying to exploit the gray zone of the part 2 licensing law will have to comply with regulations and oversight. Unlike commercially licensed operators who have clear regulations from Health Canada, operators who growing on behalf of personally licensed users are sprouting across the country. These places produce medical marijuana often right next door to homes, and can be growing hundreds or thousands of plants. They are being Page 306 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... established in barns and former greenhouses and even in subdivision homes such as in Wasaga Beach. The very real issues of water, air pollution, smell, and property values that have been raised by so many regarding commercial facilities, apply here. There is no safety and security measures. They can be connected to crime. Business can be set up and not be challenged by anyone. For example a police raid in Leamington last year that saw the seizure of thousands of plants, other narcotics, weapons and more than $200,000. They can represent a real fire hazard. Going forward please find a way to strengthen the wording of the bi-laws to also restrict and include these kinds of operators. Perhaps this can be done with formulating a definition of a cannabis operator? Anyone who grows on behalf of others for medical reasons still has a business and should be regulated. If you cannot address these issues through zoning, please continue to look whatever avenues the municipal law affords you. Some townships are tightening their definitions around nuisances. Others are tightening their site plan requirements to force business to comply with air pollution standards and implement carbon filters, odour mitigation issues etc. Finally, please find a way to include wording, standards and guidelines to discourage cannabis operators from seeking zoning amendments. Again, we thank you for your diligent leadership, time and effort on these important issues. Sincerely, Greg & Catherine Pears Page 307 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From:Jennifer O'Neill <jennistyle@gmail.com> Sent:April 14, 2020 3:53 PM To:ANGELA BALDWIN <angela.baldwin@rogers.com> Cc:Weatherell,Todd <tweatherell@oro-medonte.ca>; Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Re: draft cannabis bylaw Hello Todd, attached is the letter we sent on April 7th, so you have Angela's and ours together. Thank you and all the best. Jennifer. On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 3:33 PM ANGELA BALDWIN <angela.baldwin(krogers.com>wrote: Hi Todd, Attached is a letter with comments on the Township's draft cannabis bylaw on behalf of Jason and Jen O'Neill. They submitted a letter with their general comments last week and thought they had attached my technical review but I could not tell if it was included as it was not read aloud at the public meeting last week. I have updated my letter so could you please include the attached letter as part of the formal comments on the bylaw. thank you for your assistance Regards, Angela Baldwin, MCIP, RPP Principal Baldwin Planning and Development Consultants 3 Barrie Terrace Barrie , Ontario 1-41VI 1 E8 Tel.& Fax. (705) 739-0071 Cell (416) 578-3297 Page 308 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo April 7", 2020 To Mayor Hughes, Council Members and Planning Staff, We are residents of Oro-Medonte and have lived here for four years with our three children. We have reviewed the amended draft cannabis by-law and would like to express that it is important to distinguish that hemp should be included in the definition of cannabis. We have asked Angela Baldwin, a planning and development consultant to review the draft bylaw and have attached her comments to this letter which we would request staff consider in their review of the document. Cannabis is a relatively new industry sector that doesn't have a track record or history in how it affects public health or the environment. Allowing cannabis processing and production facilities on agricultural lands would be poor planning and would compromise community balance and quality of life. We have learned from other Ontario communities and in the US that the pervasive odour is a major concern. Research has not proven that these odours are safe. The smell can be pungent and depending on the wind direction, can carry for more than five kilometres. The odour can cause people to experience headaches and an overall feeling of un- wellness. Another serious concern is water quality and supply. Our home's water supply is a well. The run-off from higher ground comes onto our property through a stream that flows directly into Lake Simcoe. The vast quantity of water required for cannabis growth and processing is unknown as well as the disruption to aquifers and potential for compromised drinking water. We would be very concerned about the impact of a larger water user like a cannabis operation on the quality of ground water and the impact on our well. Generator noise is an issue that is not only disruptive to residents but also wildlife. Agricultural lands provide a habitat for wildlife. Generator noise, security fencing and artificial lighting would Inhibit and compromise wildlife Homeowners put the lion's share of their savings into building a home. Placing this business close to homes will irreversibly de-value people's savings and homes. We don't want our beautiful township and waterfront to be unduly impacted by these types of incompatible operations In residential areas. These uses are much better suited to Industrial land where the impacts will be reduced and which accommodate processing operations, NOT on agricultural lands. We commend planning staff and council for drafting the amended by-law to restrict Cannabis and Hemp Processing and Production facilities to Rural Industrial and Economic Development lands and fully support the draft cannabis bylaw. w. Ja on anc0ennifer O'Neill 1735 Ridge Road West Oro Medonte, LOL 21-0 Page 309 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From:Joy Levison <joylevison@gmail.com> Sent:April 14, 2020 4:23 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca>; tweatherall@oro-medonte.ca; Hughes, Harry <harry.hughes@oro-medonte.ca>; Hough, Ralph <ralph.hough@oro-medonte.ca>; DeSousa,Tammy <tammy.desousa@oro-medonte.ca>; Scott, Shawn <shawn.scott@oro-medonte.ca>; Keane, Cathy <cathy.keane@oro-medonte.ca>; Greenlaw, Randy<randy.greenlaw@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Proposed draft by-law restricting Cannabis to Industrial zoning I am writing to thank the council and the planning department in the preparation of the proposed by-law. I was delighted to get Mr. Weatherall's confirmation that the word processing was omitted by oversight, and has been added back in to the definition. I have made previous representations, and I do not wish to be redundant , but I do wish to address a couple of points that have been raised. Firstly, I took great exception to the the submission of Mr. Bill Friedman at the public meeting. Councillor Keane has asked that submission be of general application to the Township, which is proper,however Mr. Freeman's submissions were specifically only concerned with his clients property identified as 918 Line 2 South. I submit that his submission was quite misleading, representing hemp as a quite benign crop. He specifically declined to discuss what hemp is used for, that is extraction of CBD oil, requires a Cannabis production License and is a highly industrialised process. Such neither belongs in a settlement area, nor in an agricultural area. I also took great exception to the implied threat at the conclusion of his presentation, in that his client would vigorously oppose the draft by-law if passed. Neither council, nor the residents of Oro-Medonte ought to be subjected to such threats. Secondly, I have very kindly been provided with a copy of OMAFRA's response to the proposed by-law. With respect, this is a knee-jerk reaction by OMAFRA, in that the policy is sadly out of date,being created when growth of Cannabis, or Hemp beyond that for food and fibre were illegal. They quite frankly have not kept up with the conditions that legalisation of Cannabis growth and production have created. As earlier stated by me,processing of both Cannabis and hemp goes far beyond a farmer drying his own corn on farm. The Cannabis Licensing Guidelines are quite clear that an applicant must familiarise themselves and comply with all applicable provincial or territorial laws( eg environmental laws) as well as municipal bylaws ( eg zoning or building permits). You do have the right to specify where these activities may occur, and what is merely a position statement does not usurp, nor remove your right to do so. All of which is respectfully submitted, K. Joy Levison 918 Line 2 S Oro-Medonte LOL 2LO Page 310 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Wendy Powell <playagran@gmail.com> Sent: April 14, 2020 4:33 PM To: Cannabis <Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Amendment to bylaw I am writing to advise that a 500 metre setback should be enforced on cannabis hemp farms on industrial lands for the safety of children and the public as some of these lands are still close to residential areas. Kent and Wendy Powell 66 Red Oak Cres Page 311 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: lindsay boyd <lindsay_boyd5@hotmail.com> Sent: April 14, 2020 9:10 AM To: Cannabis <Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Cannabis bylaw Good morning Oro medonte Staff, My name is Lindsay Walker and I live at 787 Line 7 South in Oro Station. Can I recommended that the set backs of 150m be pushed back to some of the other councillors recommendations of 500+ Take it from someone that has had to deal with the 7th Line Cannabis Facility 24/7. 1 deal with offensive smells, lights, noise, traffic, speakers and unfortunately this problem hasn't subsided since they started production. These companies can promise you the world while building and claim to want to be good neighbours, but this facility has proven that is just all talk. I highly suggest moving the set ups to 500+ meters to protect fellow residents. Thankyou Lindsay Walker Page 312 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Maeve O'Neill <maevestyle1I@idoud.com> Sent:April 14, 2020 4:14 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Cc: Planning<Planning@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Cannabis by-law My name is Maeve O'Neill and I am 16. I live in Oro Medonte. I am putting my hope and trust in counselors and the mayor that you will do the right thing to ensure that cannabis production and processing facilities are not on agricultural lands. This is a new business with very little research done and I am worried about the health effects it will have on me and everyone else who lives in the area. My cousins live in California and have told me about how badly it smells. I am sensitive to smells and prone to headaches. I don't want to find out in a few years that I have a serious sickness that could have been prevented. I support the amended bylaw to put these on IR and ED lands only. Thank you. Maeve O'Neill 1735 Ridge Road West Page 313 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Martha Billes<tirelady@ctire.com> Sent:April 14, 2020 6:01 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Cannabis on Line 3 Oro-Medonte To who it may concern: Further to the meeting held April 7th to inform land owners and residents regarding this desecration of lands on line 3 south, I have reflected on my support of the by-Law amendment and I find myself left without hope.. I do not understand why Oro has not stopped the ongoing land desecration by at least two large Track cranes, diggers, dump trucks and numerous construction workers. The work is ongoing from dawn till dusk, seemingly every day of the week. The project consists currently of the total re-grading of 260 plus acres of farmland into a bleak, barren wasteland. They are digging and blasting a massive, industrial size water pit or some-such excavation. Our food and water are a necessity for life and this illegal and ill-conceived land usage contravenes my rights. My recreational and residential property is very close to this horrendously large industrial project. The stench of cannabis will soon be unbearable and the industrial noise of the trucks and machinery to keep artificial cultivation going 24 hours, seven day a week will be so tragically detrimental to our whole community's residents' health. Please STOP this abomination to our families, homes and our sacred waters and lands. During the meeting it became apparent that your bylaw comes too little and too late .... It is my fervent prayer that what I heard coming forward as an outcome to this prolonged discussion is not to be. The outcome must be an end to the demolition and digging. A reinstatement of true farmland on Oro-Medonte line three south needs to be demanded and enforced. There has been rule of law here in the past. How can we now disregard the premises upon which our society is based. Please help the rule of law to return. Stop the abomination and the desecration of our community well- being. This by- law amendment seems all we have to rely on. Oro-Medonte has acted very late. The regrading I witness daily is not farming but it is illegal industrial construction on line 3 south. Page 314 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... Please get the by law amended and get stop orders in place and enforced. Discussion of set- backs and other aspects of industrial land usage belong to a legally located operation not to this illegal Construction. Sincerely, Martha Billes 1511 and 1547 Ridge Rd West, Concession three Oro-Medonte LOL 2LO Page 315 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... 691 Line 9 S Oro Medonte LOL 1 TO April 14, 2020 Mr. Todd Weatherall, Intermediate Planner Planning Department Township of Oro Medonte 148 Line 7 South Oro Medonte LOL 2E0 Dear Mr. Weatherall, Proposed Draft Zoning Bylaw To Regulate Cannabis Production and Processing Facilities In Township of Oro- Medonte We are the registered owners of 691 Line 9 S in the Township of Oro- Medonte. We have made a considerable investment in this property and enjoy the peaceful rural setting in the Township. We are writing to express our support of the proposed zoning by law to regulate cannabis production and processing facilities in the Township. We support Councils intent to restrict their locations to the industrial zones and to provide further restrictions in terms of setbacks,etc. We are very concerned about the impacts that cannabis facilities would have in proximity to residential communities, schools etc with respect to odour, noise from generators and the impact to water quality. Runoff from higher lands comes towards the lake and can impact drinking water and wells. We believe that cannabis operations are much more suited to industrial lands where they can be situated around other manufacturing and processing uses and the impacts can be better controlled and managed. We would also like to commend Council on their efforts within the community to protect its citizens from COVID-19. We appreciate your efforts to stay on top of important matters in such an unprecedented time. Thank you for your consideration. Regards, l Matthew &Arnie Lavigne Page 316 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... Cassels Via Email cannabis@oro-medonte.ca ruukkivi@cassels.com April 14, 2020 tel: +1 416 860 6613 fax: +1 416 640 3110 Township of Oro-Medonte file 4 051216-00010 148 Line 7 South Oro-Medonte, Ontario LOL 2EO Attention: Derek Witlib, Manager of Planning Services Dear Sir: Re: By-law to Amend Zoning By-law 97-95, as amended (Cannabis Production and Processing Facilities) Carmel Pharms Corp. We are the solicitors for Carmel Pharms Corp. ("Carmel Pharms"), the owner of lands municipally known as 837 Line 7 South in the Township of Oro-Medonte (the "subject lands"). This letter constitutes Carmel Pharms' objection to the Township's proposed amendment to Zoning By-law 97-95, as amended which amendment is targeted at cannabis production and processing facilities (the "Anti-Cannabis By-law"). On April 7t", 2020, Oro-Medonte held a public meeting at which it presented a version of the Anti-Cannabis By-law which is devoid of planning merit. It should not be passed in its current form. It is critical to note that Bill 187, which amends the Municipal Act, 2001, only permits council and committees to meet electronically during a period where an emergency has been declared under the Emergency Management and Civil Protection Act. Bill 187 does not permit electronic public meetings under the Planning Act. Therefore, Oro-Medonte has no statutory authority to pass the Anti-Cannabis By-law as Oro-Medonte has not met the preconditions of doing so under Section 34(12) of the Planning Act. Background Carmel Pharms is the owner of the subject lands with an existing and fully operational cannabis production and processing facility (the "Facility")which has been in operation since June 2019. The Facility is licensed and was approved by Health Canada on June 21, 2019. The subject U 416 869 5300 Cassels Brock&Blackwell LLP t�416 360 8877 Suite 2100,Scotia Plaza,40 King Street West c ,sselfs.c„cairn"m Toronto,ON MSH 3C2 Canada Page 317 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... April 13, 2020 Page 2 lands are designated `Rural' in the Township of Oro-Medonte Official Plan and zoned `A/RU' Agricultural/Rural in the Township of Oro-Medonte Zoning By-law 97-95. The Facility was permitted as of right without the requirement for a site plan under the classification of"Agricultural Use, Specialized" which is defined in Township Zoning By-law 97- 95 as: Means lands where specialty crops such as tender fruits (peaches, cherries, plums), grapes, other fruit crops, ginseng, vegetable crops, greenhouse crops and crops from agriculturally developed organic soil lands are predominantly grown, usually resulting from: a) soils that have suitability to produce specialty crops, or lands that are subject to special climatic conditions, or a combination of both; and/or b) a combination of farmers skilled in the production of specialty crops, and of capital investment in related facilities to produce, store or process specialty crops. The definition specifically references `greenhouse crops' as permitted under this use. At the time of building permit for the facility, Site Plan Control was not applicable to the site. This facility is an example of a well run cannabis production and processing facility which has mitigated the perceived and potential compatibility issues associated with cannabis production in an area zoned and surrounded by agricultural and rural uses. It has demonstrated that the concerns raised by Council are inaccurate and not consistent with a well run cannabis operation. The proposed Anti-Cannabis By-law as currently drafted threatens the future plans for the facility to expand and add components to the business that are in line with agri-tourism provisions, which are appropriate in agricultural and rural zones. The Anti-Cannabis By-law is bad planning The proposed Anti-Cannabis By-law which specifically prohibits cannabis production and processing facilities under the definition of"Agricultural Use" and "Agricultural Use, Specialized," is devoid of planning merit on the basis that the production of cannabis is a form of agriculture and is appropriate in the agricultural or rural zones, irrespective of its end use or purpose of the product that is grown. The production and processing of cannabis is primarily undertaken within a `greenhouse' which produces a `plant' or `flower', which is a form of horticulture. The term `greenhouse' is found within the existing definition of`Agricultural Use, Specialized' in the Township's Zoning By-law. Critically, the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs ("OMAFRA") is of the view that cannabis cultivation fits the definition of agricultural uses in agricultural areas, including prime agricultural areas. Federally regulated licensed producers are permitted to conduct a number of activities under their licenses, including the production of a cannabis crop. These activities result in different land uses which are generally considered agricultural and agriculture- related uses. OMAFRA is clear that cannabis is a crop that produces a harvestable product and may be used for a variety of purposes beyond food production. It requires on-farm buildings and structures associated with growing crops that are also considered agricultural uses. Page 318 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... April 13, 2020 Page 2 Based on OMAFRA's views, the growing of cannabis crops qualifies as an agricultural use under the Provincial Policy Statement, including growing cannabis in greenhouses or other structures. The outdoor cultivation of cannabis is also considered permitted. Passing a by-law that prohibits agricultural uses in an agricultural uses is, first and foremost, contrary to the PPS. It is useful to note that the direction proposed by the Township is also inconsistent with the preponderance of decisions made by municipalities across Ontario, who have accepted the views of OMAFRA in how the cannabis is to be viewed in the land-use planning rubric. The Township has historically permitted cannabis production and processing in the Agricultural/Rural zone up the passage of the interim control by-law on December 12, 2018. Staff were directed to undertake a study of the land use planning policies in the Agricultural/Rural zone in order to determine whether existing zoning polices and provisions should be amended to address land use planning compatibility issues. A draft Zoning By-law was then prepared and presented on December 17, 2019 which included the Agricultura/Rural (A/RU) zone as a permitted zone for cannabis facilities. This zone was removed from the list of permitted zones as directed by Council on March 2020 without planning justification. The removal of cannabis production and processing within the agricultural/rural zone is solely based on political and/or interests of residents and lacks planning justification. In essence, the use has been prohibited in a zone based of morality. At best, there is a perception of compatibility issues that is not reflected in scientific analysis and is not accepted by the federal or provincial governments, especially since the "perceived" concerns can and should be addressed in the site plan. The Township's updated Site Plan Control By-law provides clarity and applies Site Plan control to any proposed cannabis facility. This gives the Township control on a site specific basis to regulate elements such as stormwater management, parking, access, appearance of the facility, location of buildings and fencing and landscaping. Any compatibility issues raised such as odor, lighting and activity levels should be addressed through this planning mechanism. Limiting cannabis production and processing facility to only Economic Development or Rural Industrial zoned sites also does not ensure a site will not be surrounded by sensitive land uses. A number of the sites identified in the April 7, 2020 presentation are either directly adjacent to residential uses or are within 150 metres of sensitive land uses. Perhaps this is why the distance of 150 m was chosen, an approach that will effectively eliminate all sites from consideration. The result is a prohibition of a land use through the use of stringent technical requirements that is both illegal and inappropriate. Lastly, the Anti-Cannabis By-law is inconsistent with Provincial, Regional and Local planning policy which permits agricultural uses in agricultural areas and promote the economic vitality of rural and agricultural areas: • PPS 2020 Section 1.1.4.1 f) Healthy, integrated and viable rural areas should be supported by.promoting diversification of the economic base and employment Page 319 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... April 13, 2020 Page 2 opportunities through good and services, including value- added products and the sustainable management or use of resources. • PPS 2020 Section 1.1.4.1 i) - Healthy, integrated and viable rural areas should be supported by:providing opportunities for economic activities in prime agricultural areas, in accordance with policy 2.3. • PPS 2020 Section 1.1.5.7 Opportunities to support a diversified rural economy should be promoted by protecting agricultural and other resource-related uses and directing non- related development to areas where it will minimize constraints on these uses • PPS 2020 Section 2.3.1 Prime agricultural areas shall be protected for long-term use for agriculture. • PPS 2020 Section 2.3.3.1 In prime agricultural areas, permitted uses and activities are: agricultural uses, agriculture-related uses and on-farm diversified uses. • PPS 2020 Section 2.3.3.2 In prime agricultural areas, all types, sizes and intensities of agricultural uses and normal farm practices shall be promoted and protected in accordance with provincial standards • County of Simcoe Official Plan Section 3.6.2 To enable the agricultural industry to function effectively in prime agricultural areas by minimizing conflicting and competing uses while accommodating uses and facilities which support the agricultural economy in accordance with the Planning Act and the Farm Practices Protection Act and its successors. • County of Simcoe Official Plan Section 3.7.1 To recognize, preserve and protect the rural character and promote long-term diversity and viability of rural economic activities. • Township of Oro-Medonte Official Plan Section C1.1 c) - To promote the agricultural industry and associated activities and enhance their capacity to contribute to the economy of the Township. • Township of Oro-Medonte Official Plan Section C1.2 permitted uses for Agricultural lands which include agricultural, farm related tourism establishments and commercial uses on farm properties • Township of Oro-Medonte Official Plan Section C2.2 permitted uses for Rural lands agriculture, farm related tourism establishments and commercial uses on farm properties, greenhouses. The Anti-Cannabis By-law fails to meet Section 34(12) of the Planning Act The Anti-Cannabis By-law if passed will fail to satisfy Section 34(12) of the Planning Act requiring that a public meeting be held for the purposes of giving the public an opportunity to make representation in respect to the proposed by-law. Page 320 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... April 13, 2020 Page 2 The public meeting associated with the Anti-Cannabis By-law was held on April 7, 2020 through an electronic meeting. Although previous in person public meetings have been held on previous iterations of the by-law, the by-law has been substantiality changed and requires a new public meeting to be held to satisfy Section 34(12) of the Planning Act. Bill 187 amends the Municipal Act, 2001 and provides that during any period where an emergency has been declared to exist in all or part of the municipality under the Emergency Management and Civil Protection Act, permits council and committees to participate electronically in a meeting. Bill 187 does not permit public meetings to proceed on the same basis electronically. As such, the passing of the proposed Anti-Cannabis By-law would not meet the requirements under Section 34(12) of the Planning Act under the current regulatory requirements and should not proceed to Council until the state of emergency is lifted and an in person public meeting can be held safely, or alternatively, the regulation is amended by the Province. Although it is reasonable to prepare a by-law regulating cannabis production and processing facilities to give clarity and regulation on where these uses are permitted in a municipality, it is not reasonable to pass a by-law which unduly restricts certain agricultural uses from Agricultural/Rural zones. Such a decision lacks planning rationale and is inconsistent with the provincial stance on cannabis. It is evident that a cannabis production and processing facility which is primarily comprised of a `greenhouse' producing a form of`flower' is an agricultural use and thus, should be permitted in a zone entitled "Agricultural/Rural." Based on the above reasons, the proposed Anti-Cannabis By-law as currently drafted should not be approved. The by-law should be amended to include the Agricultural/Rural zone as a permitted zone for cannabis production and processing facilities as was previously conceived by Planning staff in the draft By-law prepared in December 2019 but without the unduly restrictive technical requirements that are clearly intended to limit or eliminate the viability of Cannabis facilities within the Township. Ultimately, our client is prepared to discuss a site-specific exemption for its facility provided it will permit its expansion over time and the site is not subject to onerous technical requirements. This would be one way of resolving our client's concerns in a way that would permit the Township to otherwise bring this by-law into force without an appeal to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal. However, if passed, our client will be left with no other option. Yours truly, Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP Raivo ukkivi RU/J P LEGAL"50119854.5 Page 321 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: D Banting<timeisawheel@hotmail.com> Sent:April 14, 2020 3:21 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Follow up to Live Streamed Public forum April 7, 2019 -Amendment to By-law 97-95 To: Township of Oro-Medonte - Planners, Councillors, Mayor, I understand that the Public Meeting on April 7, 2020, was just about the By-law amendment and that our comments should be more in line with the actual wording and or intent of that By- law. We were on line for the entire meeting. We feel strongly that the language, definitions, any specialized element and such should be very intent on ensuring there are NO loop holes and that it will be a By-law that can stand up in Court and be enforced not just about future Property Owners moving in but those who are already here. 1. 1 agree with several comments that asked for a greater minimum setback from Sensitive Land Use. At the very least 500 m. 2. Include Buildings designated for Church or School even if empty. (for example should the school or church have to closed for some reason) 3. Include that regular inspections of Facilities will take place to ensure that equipment is within standard codes,in working order. Repairs and or update must be completed within 30 days. 4. Include an enforcement for valid Nuisance Complaints. 5. Include some type of Definition to stop or avoid the possibility of starting with an agricultural crop or livestock for the sole purpose of ADDING ON to their production or facility, regardless of size in the Cannabis family of crops, facility and or production. Basically to ensure that they don't start with Residential Agriculture and somehow end up including Cannabis/Hemp. thank you Tom and Deborah Banting 921 Line 3 South Oro-Medonte On LOL2L0 Page 322 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From:Valerie Thornton <vmt4141@gmail.com> Sent:April 14, 2020 2:57 PM To: Cannabis<Cannabis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Proposed Draft By-law No.2020 Comments on Council meeting on April 7th 2020 An interesting meeting but I just wish that the sound had been better as it was difficult at times to hear what the Councillors were saying; hope that this corrected before the next meeting. Am in agreement with restricting the growing of Cannabis to industrial lands in Oro- Medonte; now only permitted in Rural Industrial (IR) and Economic Development(ED) Zones. I agree with the minimum setbacks suggested from Sensitive land use being changed to 300-500 metres rather than 150 metres as in the Draft. Not sure regarding the scientific methods that were looked at in other ten municipalities which ranged from 75-250 metres,. 150 metres is DEFINITELY not enough on sensitive land. Note also that this would reduce the properties that would be able to operate such facilities.. Was impressed with the research and reading done by Councillor Keane who suggested the 300- 500 metres change which all Councillors seemed in agreement with. Found her mention of personal Production Licences interesting and the fact that they were not given by Health Canada and these should be included somehow in the By-law. Her concern regarding any loopholes is important as this new By-law must be done correctly and not rushed through. The fact that individuals with ailments who are prescribed cannabis by their doctor and can grow their own plants, amounting perhaps to as many as 100-500 plants was news to me; more alarming was that someone else can grow them for you, resulting in perhaps an individual growing for others who require it for their health, the resultant crop could amount to as much as 2,000 plants. Councillor Scott mentioned Hemp which is aligned with cannabis; wasn't/isn't there a Hemp business at Hempola Farm at 2133 Forbes Road in SpringWater Township adjacent to the #400. I do separate Hemp as I buy hemp hearts from Manitoba made from shelled hemp seed,but perhaps they are talking of a different Hemp as I know it is also used in clothing... I think that these facilities should only be allowed when they are on municipal water and that there should be no large outdoor generators; it should be mandatory to be connected to hydro, any generators only used in the case of a main power failure. I believe that it is important that light and odour pollution should be addressed when developing this very important Draft By- law. A note....I personally feel it was a mistake for our government to legalise cannabis, but am okay with it being used for medical purposes. We have a scandalous opioid/drug problem in Canada and this legalisation does nothing to help. Valerie Thornton 30 Birch Grove Drive. Horseshoe Valley. 14th April 2.56 Page 323 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... William Friedman Judy Hamilton J.Todd Holmes B.A.,B.C.L.,LL.B B.A.,B.Ed.,LLB H.A.,LL.B Biyau C.Friedman Patrick Bakos Stephen C.Nadler BFA.,J.D B.A.,J.D B.A..,J.D YU E YD*A4AN S Ma rk A.Russell Shirley Bat Yeganeh Pejman B.A.,J.D B.Sc.(Hone).M.B.A.,J.D B.A.,J.D.,J.D L 1% YV F I R M Michael W.Ruso Lauren Daneman Shida Azari B.A.(Hens),J.D B.A.,J,D B.A.,LLBMatthew Dankevy Seta Boyadjian Amakl Otuteye B.B.A.(Hone),LLB,CFA B.A(Hens),J.D S.B.A.,J.D JeYKumarasamv Selina Piekarski B.C.L.,LL.B B.A..J.D.,ID April 1.4, 2020 Sent via email: ��i_p_pa_bis(c o]°cl-n (cic t,I c..g The Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte 148 7 Line S Oro-Medonte, ON LOL 2XO Dear Sir/Madam: RE: By-law No. 2019-Draft A By-law to Amend Zoning By-law 97-95, as amended (the "Proposed Amending By-Law") We represent the owner of the property municipally known as 918 Line 3 S, and legally described as Pt Lts 26 &27 Con 3 Oro; Part 1 Plan 51R-32764 and Part Lots 26 &27 Con 3 Oro; Part 1 Plan 51R- 33758, Oro-Medonte (the "Property"). We have reviewed the Proposed Amending By-Law by the Town of Oro-Medonte (the "Town") and on behalf of our client strongly object to same for reasons outlined in this letter. t About Hemp: Industrial hemp is an agricultural commodity that is cultivated for use in the production of a wide range of products, including without limitation, cosmetic, food, beverages, nutritional supplements, fabrics and textiles, yarns and spun fibers, paper, construction and insulation materials, and other manufactured goods. Botanically, industrial hemp and marijuana are from the same species of plant, i.e. cannabis sativa, however, industrial hemp and marijuana are different cultivars that have been bred for different uses and are genetically distinct 'forms of cannabis that are distinguished by their use, chemical makeup, and differing cultivation practices in production. Marijuana is generally referred to the psyehotropic drug(whether used for medicinal or recreational purposes), industrial hemp is cultivated for use in the production of a wide range of other products. Industrial hemp contains 0.3% tetrahydrocannabinol ("THC") or less. THC is one of the chemical substances responsible for how the body reacts to cannabis. THC is the compound in the plant most commonly associated with getting a person high. In short, hemp cannot get you high. FRIEDMAN LAW PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 150 Ferrand Drive,Suite 800,Toronto,Ontario,M3C 3E5 Telephone:(416)496-3340 Facsimile:(416)497-3809 Wehsite:www.tiiedman.ca Page 324 of 327 I 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... Regulation of Hemp in Ontario: Industrial hemp is regulated federally under the Cannabis Act by the Industrial Hemp Regulations. Cultivators of industrial hemp must grow from the hemp varieties approved for commercial cultivation. The Ontario's Regulation 327/18 made under the Cannabis Act has exempted industrial hemp-related activities from Ontario's Cannabis Control Act. This allows federal industrial hemp license holders to exercise their licenses without contravening provincial law. i Provincial Policy Statement and Official Plan: The responsibility for long-term planning in Ontario is shared between the Province of Ontario and municipalities located therein. The Province of Ontario sets the ground rules and directions for land use planning through the PlanningAct and the Provincial Policy Statement("PPS"). The PPS is issued under section 3 of the PlanningAct.Municipalities must create official plans to implement the PPS and provincial plans.All municipal decisions including the implementation of any by-laws which regulate land-use must be consistent with the PPS and the official plans introduced by such municipality. We refer you to the Consolidated Version of the Official Plan of the Town dated January 2020 (the "Official Plan"), pursuant to which the Town is obligated to "ensure that agriculture remains an integral part of the economy of the Township and the County." The Official Plan also indicates that the Town is to "protect land suitable for agricultural production from development and land uses 1 unrelated to agriculture". Further,the Town defines the"Agricultural Use"as the use of land for the growing,producing,keeping or harvesting of farm products. Hemp, being an agricultural commodity, falls within the meaning of "farm products". As such, prohibiting the growth of hemp outdoors in agricultural zoned areas of the Town limits the ability of agricultural uses to continue,which is in direct contravention of the Official Plan and the PPS. Moreover,the prohibition proposed in the Proposed Amending By-Law constitutes a restriction on normal farming practices and is in violation of the Farming and Food Production Protection Act, 1998. The Town must ensure that the Proposed Amending By-Law is in compliance with the PPS and Official Plan and does not violate normal farm practices. The Proposed Amending By-Law fails to provide protection for agriculture and farmland. We urge the Town to differentiate between the definition of industrial hemp and marijuana and to further amend the Proposed Amending By-Law to permit the growth of hemp outdoors in agricultural zoned areas. The Township's failure to do so constitutes a violation of the PPS, Official Plan and the Farming and Food Production Protection Act . Yours truly, Friedman Law Professional Corporation i Per: WilliamFriedman Page 325 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From:Akhtar, Usman (MTO) <Usman.Akhtar@ontario.ca> Sent: November 22, 2019 1:25 PM To: Falconi,Teresa <tfa Icon i@oro-medonte.ca>; Witlib, Derek<dwitlib@oro-medonte.ca>; Karaiskakis, Andy<aKaraiskakis@oro-medonte.ca>; Weatherell,Todd <tweatherell@oro-medonte.ca>; McLean, Catherine<cmclean@oro-medonte.ca> Cc: lannacito, Phil (MTO) <Phil.lannacito@ontario.ca> Subject: RE: Notice of Public Meeting 2019-ZBA-01 (Cannabis Production & Processing Facilities Good Afternoon, MTO Building and Land Use and/or Entrance permits are required for sites fronting Highway 400/11/12 or within the MTO's permit control area. Cannabis production and processing facilities require a commercial access and commercial requirements and fees apply. Some sites with direct highway access may not qualify for a new commercial entrance. Let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Usman Page 326 of 327 3.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zo... From: Melissa Carruthers<MCarruthers@severnsound.ca> Sent: December 5, 2019 2:19 PM To: Weatherell,Todd <tweatherell@oro-medonte.ca>; Falconi,Teresa <tfalconi@oro-medonte.ca> Cc: Michelle Hudolin <MHudolin@severnsound.ca> Subject: RE: Notice of Public Meeting 2019-ZBA-01 (Cannabis Production & Processing Facilities Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the draft by-law to amend zoning by-law 97-95, as amended to include Cannabis Processing and Production Facilities. The SSEA has two minor comments to add under section 5.40.1: 1. Consideration should be given to existing natural heritage features and their functions 2. It is recommended additional text be included to indicate additional provisions may be required, from outside agencies, depending on location to things such as municipal wells, water courses, natural heritage features etc. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me. Melissa Carruthers Risk Management Official / Risk Management Inspector Severn Sound Environmental Association 489 Finlayson St, P.O. Box 460, Port McNicoll, ON LOK 1 RO P (705)534-7283 ext. 205/Fax(705)534-7459 MCarruthers(@severnsound.ca I www.severnsound.ca I (@SSEA SSRAP Page 327 of 327