10 18 2021 Heritage Committee Agenda The Township of Oro-Medonte
��� Heritage Committee Agenda
� Electronic Meeting
Township of
Monday, October 18, 2021
Proud Heritage, Excitivaq Future 5:00 p.m.
Effective Tuesday, September 7, 2021 , all Township facilities will re-open to the public
with safety measures in place including: mandatory masks/face coverings;
COVID-19 health screening; and social distancing.
Taking into consideration positive COVID-19 cases in Simcoe Muskoka and beyond,
and contagious transmission of the COVID-19 Delta variant, whenever possible,
residents and business owners are encouraged to utilize online and telephone
services for Township related business.
Input on agenda items are welcome and encouraged.
If you would like to attend the meeting electronically, please email 'jteeter@oro-
medonte.ca' your name, email address you are participating with, and if you are
participating via computer or telephone.
The Township of Oro-Medonte is committed to providing and maintaining a working
environment that is based on respect for the dignity and rights of everyone within the
organization and for those individuals visiting our organization.
The Township of Oro-Medonte supports and fosters an environment that is safe,
welcoming and respectful for all residents, visitors, members of Council and staff.
Page
1. Agenda Approval:
a) Motion to Approve the Agenda.
2. Disclosure of Pecuniary Interest:
3. Approval of Minutes of Previous Meeting:
3 - 6 a) Minutes of Heritage Committee meeting held on Monday, June 21, 2021 .
4. Communications:
7 - 18 a) Community Heritage Ontario, CHOnews, Quarterly Publication, Summer
2021 .
Page 1 of 86
5. Reports of Members of Council/Municipal Officers:
19 a) Catherine McCarroll, Intermediate Planner re: Rail Trail Designation.
20 - 27 b) Catherine McCarroll, Intermediate Planner re: Index of Register of Heritage
Listed/Designated Properties, Potential Listing for Rugby Cemetery, 1933
Old Barrie Road East.
28 c) Catherine McCarroll, Intermediate Planner re: Rugby Cemetery Signage,
1933 Old Barrie Road East.
29 - 30 d) Catherine McCarroll, Intermediate Planner re: Valley View Cemetery
Signage.
31 - 85 e) Catherine McCarroll, Intermediate Planner re: Ministry of Heritage, Sport,
Tourism and Culture Industries, Heritage Conservation in Ontario Training
Session, June 2021 .
86 f) Andria Leigh, Deputy CAO/Director, Development Services re: Township
Parks & Recreation Master Plan Update.
6. Next Meeting Date:
Monday, November 15, 2021 (TBC).
7. Adjournment:
a) Motion to Adjourn.
Page 2 of 86
3.a) Minutes of Heritage Committee meeting held on Monday, June 21 , 2021 ...
The Township of Oro-Medonte
T Heritage Committee Meeting Minutes
Township of
to Electronic Meeting
Proud Heritage,Exciting Future
Monday, June 21, 2021 5:04 p.m.
Present: Mayor H.S. Hughes
Councillor Cathy Keane, Chair
Councillor Tammy DeSousa
Stephen Davids
Ruth Fountain
Dorothy Moore
Kayla Thibeault
Bob Tudhope
Jess Woodrow
Staff Present: Andria Leigh, Director, Development Services; Catherine McLean,
Intermediate Planner; Shawn Binns, Director, Operations and
Community Services; Janette Teeter, Supervisor, Clerk's
Services/Deputy Clerk
Idow- -Iqqw %k jj%hhh.-Vq
All Committee members and staff participated via ZOOM platform.
1. Agenda Approval:
a) Motion to Approve the Agenda.
Motion No. HC210621-1 11
Moved by Moore, Seconded by Davids
It is recommended that the agenda for the Heritage Committee meeting held on
Monday, June 21 , 2021 be received and approved.
Carried.
2. Disclosure of Pecuniary Interest:
None declared.
Page 1 of 4
Page 3 of 86
3.a) Minutes of Heritage Committee meeting held on Monday, June 21 , 2021 ...
Heritage Committee Minutes — Monday, June 21, 2021.
3. Approval of Minutes of Previous Meeting:
a) Minutes of Heritage Committee meeting held on Monday, April 19, 2021 .
Motion No. HC210621-2
Moved by Fountain, Seconded by Thibeault
It is recommended that the draft minutes of Heritage Committee meeting held on
Monday, April 19, 2021 be received and approved as printed and circulated.
Carried.
4. Communications:
a) Community Heritage Ontario, CHOnews, Quarterly Publication, Spring 2021 .
Motion No. HC210621-3
Moved by Woodrow, Seconded by Moore.
Vk
6hxh.�
It is recommended that the Community Heritage Ontario, CHOnews, Quarterly
Publication, Spring 2021 be received.
Carried.
5. Reports of Members of Council/Municipal Officers:
a) Shawn Binns, Director, Operations and Community Services; and Roz Llewellyn,
Coordinator, Community Recreation re: Oro African Church and Governance.
Motion No. HC210621-4 il 1%
Moved by Tudhope, Seconded by Woodrow
It is recommended that the verbal information presented by Shawn Binns, Director,
Operations and Community Services re: Oro African Church and Governance be
received.
Carried.
Page 2 of 4
Page 4 of 86
3.a) Minutes of Heritage Committee meeting held on Monday, June 21 , 2021 ...
Heritage Committee Minutes — Monday, June 21, 2021.
b) Correspondence dated June 14, 2021 from Committee Member Kayla Thibeault re:
Cultural Heritage Resource Evaluation Form, Request for Designation of Oro-Medonte
RailTrail.
Motion No. HC210621-5
Moved by Davids, Seconded by Tudhope
It is recommended
1. That the correspondence dated June 14, 2021 from Committee Member Kayla
Thibeault re: Cultural Heritage Resource Evaluation Form, Request for Listing and
Designation of Oro-Medonte RailTrail be received.
2. That it is recommended to Council AINK
• That the Oro-Medonte RailTrail be listed and added to the Municipal Register of
Municipal significant and/or cultural heritage properties;
• That staff proceed with obtaining a cultural heritage assessment for the Oro-
Medonte RailTrail.
3. That the matter be returned to the Heritage Committee for their consideration.
Carried.
c) Committee Member Dorothy Moore re: Valley View Cemetery, Consideration for
Recognition of a Stone/Plaque.
Motion No. HC2106212-
Moved by Tudhope, Seconded by Fountain
It is recommended
1. That the correspondence dated May 6, 2021 and information presented by
Committee Member Dorothy Moore and Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner
re: Valley View Cemetery, Consideration for Recognition of a Stone/Plaque be
received.
2. That-staff investigate, including additional information on the Township website,
regarding the Valley View Cemetery to recognize and provide detailed
background/history and costing for a plaque/sign to be located 1888 Line 13 North
location in the area.
3. That the matter, including costing for the plaque, be returned to the Heritage
Committee for further consideration.
Carried.
Page 3 of 4
Page 5 of 86
3.a) Minutes of Heritage Committee meeting held on Monday, June 21 , 2021 ...
Heritage Committee Minutes — Monday, June 21, 2021.
d) Correspondence dated April 16, 2021 from Committee Member Stephen Davids re:
Request for Support to be a Township Heritage Committee Representative on the Orillia
Museum of Art and History (OMAH) Board; and Simcoe County Historical Association
(SCHA).
Motion No. HC210621-7
Moved by Thibeault, Seconded by Woodrow
It is recommended that the correspondence dated April 16, 2021 from Committee
Member Stephen Davids re: Request for Support to be a Township Heritage Committee
Representative on the Orillia Museum of Art and History (OMAH) Board; and Simcoe
County Historical Association (SCHA) be received.
Carried.
e) Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re: Ontario Heritage Act - Recent Amendments,
June, 2021 from the Ministry of Heritage, Sport, Tourism and Culture Industries.
Motion No. HC210621-8
Moved by Fountain, Seconded by Davids ,
It is recommended that the presentation dated June, 2021 and provided by Catherine
McLean, Intermediate Planner re: Ontario Heritage Act - Recent Amendments from the
Ministry of Heritage, Sport, Tourism and Culture Industries be received.
Carried.
a
6. Next Meeting Date:
Monday, September 20, 2021 (T' ).
%%%o
7. Adjournment: 16,
a) Motion to Adjourn.
Motion No. HC210621-9"
Moved by Moore, Seconded by Thibeault
It is recommended that we do now adjourn at 7:27 p.m.
Carried.
Councillor Keane, Chair Janette Teeter, Deputy Clerk
Page 4 of 4
Page 6 of 86
4.a) Community Heritage Ontario, CHOnews, Quarterly Publication, Summer ...
most. SUMMER/ETE
2021
W ;
CHOnews
QUARTERLY PUBLICATION OF COMMUNITY HERITAGE ONTARIO/PATRIMOINE COMMUNATAIRE DE UONTARIO
ONTARIO COTTAGE COMEBACK STORY
GEORGEDUNCAN
People involved in the conservation of Ontario's built to serve as the manse for the Congregational Church next
cultural heritage are all too familiar with buildings door.After a fire in 1872 destroyed the factory and damaged
that could not be retained and restored for a host of reasons: his residence, David Cash left the area and moved to Reach
too far gone, mould, dry rot, not structurally sound, not Township.The house at 16 Church Street was rented out by
deemed significant enough and more.Take heart,heritage speculators for a time, until it was purchased by John and
advocates, because there are good news stories to be told Ellen Kellett in 1898.The Kelletts were bakers.They added a
that bring a little light into our sometimes-discouraging bakery to the rear of the house that is illustrated on old fire
field of interest. This is the story of a modest example of insurance maps.
Ontario vernacular architecture that was preserved in a
creative way,in spite of the odds against it.
At the corner of Church and George Streets, in a
residential neighbourhood of the Markham Village Heritage
Conservation District,stands a good example of an Ontario
Cottage.This house form is characterized by its one-storey
height, hipped roof and general sense of balance. Early '� k
examples with sophisticated detailing such as French
doors and tent-roofed verandahs are known as Ontario -
Regency Cottages. The house at 16 Church Street, dating
from circa 1860, is a simple and modestly scaled dwelling,
enhanced with peaked door and window heads that show
the influence of the classic revival style.
David Cash, a pump and fanning mill manufacturer, had
a successful business on the east side of Main Street in old The David Cash Workers' Cottage, restored and containing a
designer's office and residence. (G.Duncan,2021)
Markham Village. He purchased an investment property on
a backstreet in 1848, six years after establishing his factory. Moving ahead to more recent times, this property was
Around 1860, or perhaps a little earlier, he built a house on again acquired for investment purposes and rented out
a portion of his land holdings.Since he lived on Main Street, until it became uninhabitable.When the house went up for
this was not his personal residence,but served as a property sale,there were many inquiries about demolition, however
to rent out. It is possible that someone associated with the the configuration and size of the lot were not ideal for
business lived there,or perhaps it may have been intended redevelopment for a new house of a size that the market
Continued on page 3.
IN THIS ISSUE
Ontario Cottage Comeback Story 1 Extensive Changes to the Ontario Heritage Act - Are
President's Message 2 you ready? 8
Letter to the Editor 4 City Architecture Goes Viral 10
Architectural Styles:Ontario Gothic 4 News from the Board of Directors 11
Foundations:A Showcase of Stone Craftsmanship 6
Page 7 of 86
4.a) Community Heritage Ontario, CHOnews, Q r ...
PRESIDENT'S MESSAGE CHOnews
Amended Heritage Act Now In-force
Effective July 1, 2021, amendments to the Ontario SUMMER/ETE 2021
- Heritage Act (OHA) made through Bill 108, More
i' Homes, More Choices Act, 2019, were proclaimed. In CHOnews is published quarterly byCommunity Heritage Ontario.
addition, Regulation 385/21 which arises from the OHA Editor:Julie Driver
amendments, is in effect. You should be aware of Community Heritage Ontario,
these changes as they affect notification requirements 24 Conlins Road,
for listing and designation, the process for securing, Scarborough,ON M1C1C3
416.282.2710
amending and repealing listings and designations and infogDcommunityheritageontario.ca
alterations to Part IV designated properties. Regulation 9/06, the criteria for
Contributors permit further copying
cultural heritage value for designation, has no changes. We have included a of their works only for the purposes
presentation I made to the City of Pickering Council on June 24,which includes of educating the public on heritage
some of these changes, on the CHO/PCO website. The Ministry has posted matters. Copyright remains with the
author or creator. Credit must be
draft sections of the Heritage Toolkit describing the new processes on the given to the author or creator and to
Environmental Registry at https://ero.ontario.ca/notice/019-2770. The Local the source, CHOnews, on all copies
made. No work can be reprinted in any
Planning Appeals Tribunal (LPAT) and the Conservation Review Board (CRB) no published form without permission of
longer exist;their functions have been rolled into the Ontario Land Tribunal (OLT). the copyright holder.
The content of CHOnews does not
Some of the major changes: contain nor reflect any opinion,position,
or influence of the Board of Directors or
Listing the Editor.
owner must be notified after Council has made its decision; The financial support of the Ministry of
Council must indicate the cultural heritage values of the listing for Tourism, Culture and Sport is gratefullyacknowledged.
notification;
facebook.com/CHOntario
Council must consider an objection to the listing.
twitter.com/CHOntario
Part IV designation
ISSN 1201-9852
owner may appeal to Council after intent to designate approved;
owner may appeal to OLT after designation by-law passed;
OLT,not Council, has final decision on designation after appeal;and
Council must designate within 120 days of publication of intent.
Places of Pain,Sorrow and Incarcerations
The recent findings of unmarked graves at former Indian Residential School 4
sites have brought to the fore the profound and lasting injustices perpetrated
on a group of our people. The Heritage Conference in Sault Ste. Marie gave us Ala
the opportunity to visit a former Residential School site, now part of Algoma
University. While such sites should be retained where ever possible with the
support of the affected peoples,it is just as important that the story of these sites Submitted articles must be in
be told. Algoma,together with the School survivors, has done an impressive job Microsoft Word format. Images
must be sent as jpg attachments in
of conveying the stories of those who were forced to attended these Schools. high quality resolution (300 dpi). Do
These stories and heritage sites help us understand the deep and lasting effects not embed the images in the text
of such injustices. I know that I was deeply affected by visiting the site and of the article. Captions and credits
thankful that it was saved and interpreted.
must be provided.
Newspaper articles as updates
Stay safe. to MHC activities cannot be
used without permission of the
newspaper and/or the original
Wayne Morgan author. Text written by the MHC is
encouraged.
Articles are published in the
language they are received.
2 CHONEWS I COMM UNITYHERITAGEONTARIO.CA I SUMMER/ETE 2021 Page 8 of 86
Continuedfroma) Community Heritage Ontario, CHOr�eows .Quirt �r Publication Scum er .
g parts o nta,io in t o s w en trees were p eT u and
seemed to demand. That discouraged many potential lumber was relatively inexpensive. The technique used to
purchasers. Then, something unexpected happened: a raise the walls was to lay one inch by five-or six-inch planks
buyer came forward with an innovative idea to restore the one atop another and nail them together until the desired
derelict house, construct a moderately-sized addition, and wall height was achieved.There is no wall cavity in this type
use it as a combined office and residence. of construction.Typically,the plankswere offset layer by layer
Markham has a Home Occupation By-law that allows to provide keying for exterior stucco and interior plaster.
businesses to operate within residential zones, subject to This example in Markham Village is latefor plank-on-plank.
certain restrictions and requirements. Office uses are the Rather than offsetting the planks on both the exterior and
most common and well-suited to this concept. Businesses interior,the builder chose to laythem flush on the outside to
cannot have a commercial sign, they can only occupy a receive narrow clapboard siding. The interior however, had
percentage of the floor area of the dwelling, and there has the offset to receive plaster. Renovations also showed that
to be a residential component used by the operator of the the main interior partitions were also plank-on-plank.
business.The Gregory Design Group,the new owner in 2018,
a
applied for a Minor Variance to allow a larger percentage
of the building to be used for commercial purposes. This E
family-owned company specializes in custom home design I
I =
and has been long-established in the Unionville-MarkhamY �—
Village area. Many of their projects involve additions to
heritage houses, so the owners had the knowledge and
appreciation of older buildings and neighbourhoods to
draw them to this project.
e
After the variance was approved, plans for the restoration
of the old house and an addition went through a Site Plan
Approval process. The design left the heritage building in
its existing location, with a new foundation, and added a
compatible wing that contained a dwelling unit and garage.
This left most of the floorplate of the original building
reserved for a design studio,offices and a meeting room. Interior view showing the offsetting of the planks to receive plaster,and
When the project got underway, two significant things remnants of former plank-on-plank partitions.(City of Markham,2018)
came to light. The first item of interest was the type of The second item of note revealed by exploratory work
construction. Gutting the interior and removal of some was the amount of wet rot and insect damage found in the
sections of exterior cladding revealed the underlying wall walls, apparently caused by many years of water infiltration
structure was a variant of "plank-on-plank" or "sawmill from a leaky roof. One disadvantage of plank-on-plank
plank." This mode of wall construction appeared in some wall construction is that when it gets wet for an extended
a period of time, it becomes an ideal habitat for carpenter
ants. This may have killed the chances of preserving the
heritage house if different people had been involved, but
in this case, portions of sound wall structure were retained,
and damaged sections were removed and replaced with
conventional framing. The bad news that members of
municipal heritage committees are loath to hear, "It has to
- come down,"was not heard this time.
The restoration of the David Cash Workers' Cottage
was completed 2018-2019. The old two over two windows
were restored by David Wylie Restorations, the same
company that supplied a salvaged, four-panelled door for
the main entrance. New siding matching the original was
installed, as well as louvered shutters. A neighbourhood
nuisance hasthus become an attractive part ofthe heritage
Plank-on-plank wall construction revealed during exploratory work. neighbourhood, with the business having little impact on
Note the extent of wood rot exposed when exterior claddings were the primarily residential character of the area.
removed.(City of Markham,2018)
SUMMER/ETE 20211 coMMUNft RQA�f R ARIO.CA CHONEWS 3
4.a� C�omMyr�i� Herit�y e Ontaario ppOnews Qui0gly Pubi_icaAion Summer ...
This excellent proje is snows a t seeming posslbTe ion uclve to crebitive t In In when ace wltf'� a hers age
can be achieved in heritage conservation when the right building that at first glance seems impossible to save.
combination of people and circumstances come together. George Duncan is a former Senior Heritage Planner with
It comes down to the attitude of the players involved being the City of Markham.
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
I read with interest the article on "Ontario's Musical to do with why the"grand old lady"still stands at the corner
Heritage Sites" by Michael Seaman. The references to of Bridge Street and Lake Avenue in Carleton Place today.
Stompin'Tom Connors caught my eye! The building was saved, restored, and today is known as
In June of 1967 Tom Connors rolled into Carleton Place, "The Grand Hotel".
Ontario, driving his pickup truck, and parked behind the While not a designated property, the building is under
Mississippi Hotel on Bridge Street.Carrying his guitar and a consideration to be included in the town's Register of
piece of plywood, he auditioned for owner Lorraine Lemay Properties of Cultural and Heritage Value.
and was offered a month-long engagement at the hotel, Shortly after Connor's death in 2013 a mural was painted
along with room and board.While working at the Hotel he by artist Shaun McGinnis on the side of a nearby building,
wrote his song "Big Joe Mufferaw", and it became his first overlooking the hotel,in honour of Stompin'Tom.
big hit.The song tells tall tales of French-Canadian folk hero Jennifer Irwin
Mufferaw Joe... Chair,
"and they say Big Joe used to get real wet Carleton Place Municipal Heritage Committee
from cutting down timber and working up a sweat
I, o -
and everyone'II tell ya around Carleton Place
The Mississippi dripped off of Big Joe's face..."
In 1990 when the big old stone Mississippi Hotel, built in
1872,was threatened with demolition,Tom made a written (
plea to the public saying, "All that can be done must be
done to ensure the preservation of the Grand Old Lady". In The Grand Hotel (Collection of the Carleton Place and
1990 Tom was in his reclusive period,so when he made that Beckwith Heritage Museum)and Stompin'Tom mural(J.Irwin)
statement,the media took note!That notice had everything
ARCHITECTURAL STYLES: ONTARIO GOTHIC
NANCY MATTHEWS
Ontario Gothic is a deceptively simple house-style but many smaller versions only have one ground floor
prevalent throughout the entire province,with some window centred between the two upper windows.
of the earliest surviving examples dating from before 1800. Original eaves would have been decorated with ornate
The fagade is the long side of a rectangular structure with gingerbread, which in many cases has not survived our
a central door flanked by a window on either side. Usually, Canadian winter weather.
the main floor windows have the same shape and trim as The ground floor is generally divided into two sections by
the door. a central staircase. These sections can be one larger room
The lengthwise gable roof is broken by a high gable on either side of the stairs or divided in two, separated by
directly above the door. The window or door in this central a connecting door. Larger homes often had two windows
peak sometimes has the same shape and trim as other each side of the door and a centre hall beside the stairs.
windows,but more often is different with a more decorative At least one of the front rooms would have a door into the
shape and trim such as a round arch or a pointed gothic entryway.This formal sitting room was used for entertaining
window,which along with gables,gives the style its name. guests, for celebrations, for funeral visitation, and if needs
The two sides are usually identical with two upper-storey be, could be converted to a bedroom for elderly, sick or
windows in the 4S degree gable ends. In larger structures infirm members of the family.
there are two windows directly below the upper windows, Upstairs generally had foursmall,sloped-ceiling bedrooms
4 CHONEWS I COMMUNITYHERITAGEONTARIO.CA I SUMMER ETE=l Page 10 of 86
accessed fro4_�)e Tialfvvary TF�'et�iviHdowtapeve9het rol0, CrequOirepfa Sll?s�s' Fivaifdiegl�naPterblsCqainoa'fu worstorey"
door let natural light into the upstairs hall,which otherwise structure. It was also subject to less heat-loss in winter.
would be very dark. The steep gable roof easily withstood the snow load of a
Most Ontario Gothic houses would have had a covered Canadian winter and shed the snow quickly in spring.
porch, either across the entire facade or a simple portico
over the entry. Probably due to poor repair, many of these
porches were later removed, which explains those upper
"mother-in-law doors"that lead nowhere.On those houses,
a flat-roofed porch would have provided an upper balcony _ y
that could be used to air bedding. Many houses have an
iron spike jutting out from the peak of the front gable. A
pulley attached to the hook could help hoist larger furniture f
through the upper window if the staircase or upper hallway
were too narrow.
III
"N Located on Delburn Dr,this designated 1871 lV2-storey house
with a g
single gothic style able on the main,east facade,is one
g g Y
of a few cut fieldstone farmhouses surviving in Scarborough.
The three-bay main facade has cream coloured brick quoining
surrounding the openings and at the building corners.
(R. Schofield)
a -
se
�i
Ontario Gothic houses in Grey Highlands feature differing colors _
of local brick with elegant designs in a contrasting color at corners,
in often curved vousoirs above windows and/or in a banding frieze. a
The just discernable wooden strip above the door indicates that
this farmhouse had a covered porch, and probably gingerbread
that has not survived.(N.Matthews)
Largely as a fire precaution,the kitchen was generally in a
wing off the rear of the main floor. Originally these kitchen- y
wings were one storey, built of wood and used about nine
months a year as a "summer kitchen". Many such were later 10 Station Lane is just one of many Ontario Gothic frame
replaced by a solid one or two-storey addition. homes in historic Unionville.The upper window pair with the
In cases where a growing family needed more space, accented arch is unusual, as is the curved "chaumiere" porch
an exact replica of the original home was built at right roof. (R. Hutchinson)
angles across one of the ends, which creates a rather odd In colonial Upper Canada, property tax was 30£on a one-
appearance of having two facades. storey home, and 60£ for two-storeys. This storey-and-a-
Throughout the province, Ontario Gothic houses can be half layout was taxed as a one-storey structure. Hence, for
small with only one window either side of the door, or they pragmatic pioneers,one primary reason for the prevalence
can be much larger with one larger single window, or a of Ontario Gothic is a form of tax evasion!
pair of windows either side of the door. Houses are built in Nancy Matthews is a member of the CHO/PCO Board of
wood, stone, or local brick according to local availability of Directors and is the Chair of Heritage Grey High/ands.
craftsmen and materials.
This snug and tidy-looking style was highly practical.The
lower profile and use of the gabled "attic" for bedrooms �aa�rypp '! f ��j
SUMMER/ETE 2021 I coM UUA9AER1 Aqf R ARIo.cA I CHONEWS S
4.a) Community Heritage Ontario, CHOnews, Quarterly Publication, Summer ...
FOUNDATIONS: A SHOWCASE OF STONE CRAFTSMANSHIP
DON TAYLOR
When admiring the architecture of a heritage house where the good surface is flattened with the use of a
one naturally surveys the design of the fagade's hammer with a pointed head.These stones can be identified
prominent features: the entrance, the layout of walls and by the dimpled surface, with the dimples being relatively
windows,and decorative elements expressive of particular coarse or fine in different cases, and sometimes very fine
style or architect.This article encourages us to also take note with patterns when multiple-pointed hammers were used.
of the foundation walls which are often a showcase of stone Another common style that became increasingly popular
craftsmanship. in the late 19th century is usually called rock-faced, where
Stone foundations were a universal component of early through a combination of stone selection and chisel work
buildings, but they disappeared as concrete foundations the exposed face shows a very rough surface,such as might
started to supplant them after 1910. Local stone would of resemble a natural outcrop. For the best quality stonework,
course be used, most often limestone, as in the Kingston called ashlar, the upper, lower, and side surfaces are cut
examples used to illustrate this article. The foundation accurately square and flat so that the masonryjoints are very
stonework was almost entirely done by hand and provides narrow. Usually, the exposed surface in ashlar stonework is
an important display of masonry skills and architectural smooth and flat, but it may be given a hammer-dressed or
design. rock-faced finish.Other stone finishes,more decorative than
- these, are sometimes seen but are more likely to appear
- in commercial buildings. Whatever the surface finish, the
-ry } 'e stone face might also be given a smoothed margin a few
t.
centimeters wide to act as a frame for the stone finish.This
would be called a margined stone, and in some cases, one
might see decorative tooling in the margins.
4 Most houses of this period have full basements and
the foundation walls accordingly have to provide window
Figure 1 openings. These openings may be topped with standard
stone voussoirs, but an interesting variety of stonework can
As an introductory example, consider Figure 1 which be seen, including flat and arched lintels or massive stones
shows part of the foundation of a relatively early(1856) brick that serve both as lintels and as part of the base course.
building in Kingston's old downtown residential area.What It quickly becomes evident that the most interesting
does it tell us? First of all,the presence of a stone foundation stone foundations are often those of brick houses,and this is
wall is reliable evidence of an early house, whereas walls easily understood. Frame houses are usually relatively plain
and windows may have been altered by later renovations. in overall design, and their builders are unlikely to invest
Indeed, the design and execution of the stonework often in elaborate stone foundations. Stone houses themselves,
allows us to estimate the age of the building within a while often ambitious in design, typically date from the
decade or two.Then we observe how the stones are laid-in pre-Confederation era when building design tended to be
this case in uniform courses on the street fagade,whereas formal and restrained rather than ornamental. Often, they
on the side wall the coursing is quite irregular. This figure may simply have a base course that marks the transition
also shows that the stone foundation is topped by a uniform to better quality stonework above the foundation wall. On
stone course that provides the base for laying the brick of the other hand, brick houses became popular choices in
the main walls. This is called a base course and often, as the late 1800s throughout Ontario. House designs became
here,features stones with smooth surfaces. increasingly decorative in that period, and this influence
To properly appreciate stone craftsmanship of this period, carried over intofoundation stonework.The most impressive
some explanation of foundation stonework is in order. foundations are generally found on substantial brick houses
Stones from the quarry can sometimes be used directly of prominent architects of the late Victorian period.
in building a wall, but for better quality houses the stones With this information we note that the foundation wall
were usually shaped with hammer and chisel.This method of Figure 1 shows squared hammer-dressed stones laid in
resulted in good faces that were more or less rectangular in uniform courses, topped by a smooth ashlar base course.
outline and had a reasonably flat surface.Such basic stones The window opening has traditional stone voussoirs. On
are sometimes called pitch-faced because of the use of the the side wall, however, there is no base course and the
pitching chisel.A better grade of stone is hammer-dressed, stonework is pitch-faced and uncoursed.
6 CHONEWS I COMMUNITYHERITAGEONTARIO.CA I SUMMER ETE 2021 Page 12 of 86
Com
li
g'po koto ews oSSCc9fade§stoneTeThefollowinf e � 35 � Jt nr Fr
stone foundations in Kingston's old residential area. Most base course is rock-faced with smooth margins. A special
Ontario towns and cities have substantial brick houses of feature isthe margined lintel forming part ofthe base course
the Victorian period that can provide similar examples. with a finish described as vermiculated, not common in
�. residential houses.
- • p
x€i
r
14
Arm
ty
ate.... . . `"
Figure
Figure 2 shows rock-faced stonework around a curved
corner, with bevelled rock-faced base course. The wall
is constructed in broken courses, more common in late
Victorian houses, rather than uniform courses, providing -- - - - - -
greater strength as well as a more interesting pattern. Figure 4
,� Figure 4 shows fine ashlar stonework with courses
WA �� �� alternating in widths and with hammer-dressed and rock-
faced finishes.The corner stones have prominent margins.
The base course is bevelled smooth ashlar.
These examples suggest that the best way to study
Ontario heritage stonework may well be to look at the
foundations of Victorian brick houses. In a pleasant walk
F along older residential streets you can discover house
foundations with interesting stonework, and none of them
the same! Sometimes the stonework will be enhanced by
- attractive garden plants, but equally good stonework may
a -4 be hiding behind garbage cans, gas meters, and weeds.
Happy exploring!
Don Taylor is a member of the Frontenac Heritage
Foundation and Vice-Chair of Kingston s Municipal Heritage
Committee. A version of this article appeared in the
Frontenac Heritage Foundation newsletter Photography 9 9 PY by
Figure 3 Don Taylor.
CHO/PCO MISSION STATEMENT
To encourage the development of municipally appointed heritage advisory committees and
to further the identification, preservation, interpretation, and wise use of community heritage
locally, provincially, and nationally.
SUMMER/ETE 2021 1 coMMUiV'I9AE14A9EQNTARIo.cA I CHONEWS 7
4.a) Community Heritage Ontario, CHOnews, Quarterly Publication, Summer ...
EXTENSIVE CHANGES TO THE ONTARIO HERITAGE ACT- ARE YOU READY?
REGAN HUTCHESON
As of July 1, 2021, the Ontario Government has municipalities to track which properties were listed pre
introduced wide-ranging changes to the legislation and post July 1st as it relates to objection rights.
used to identify and protect cultural heritage resources in
our province. These are the most extensive changes to the Designation of Property-Notice of Intention to Designate
Ontario Heritage Act since 2005 and impact a variety of for"Prescribed Events"
municipal processes and requirements.Also now in force is There are changesto the designation process(Section 29),
Regulation 385/21 which provides further direction on how including timeframes associated with certain development
certain aspects of the legislation is to be interpreted and applications. Municipalities will now have 90 days to
implemented. issue a Notice of Intention to Designate (NOID) when a
To assist in the understanding of the new heritage property is subject to a Planning Act application for an
conservation legislation, the government is updating a Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment,
number of its guidance documents which unfortunately or a Plan of Subdivision. This timeframe begins when the
are not planned for release until sometime this fall. The municipality declares the application 'complete' and the
legislative changes have raised many questions concerning limitation to issue a NOID only applies in these prescribed
processes and implementation, and it is hoped that these circumstances. The timeline can be extended or eliminated
new documents will provide the necessary assistance. if the municipality and the property owner agree (or if the
Here are some of the key highlights of the legislation and municipality declares an emergency under the Emergency
the regulation: Management and Civil Protection Act).
Comment: Due to this new timeframe, municipalities
The Register may wish to discuss the concept of a waiver or
There are new requirements for listing non-designated extension of the timeframe during the pre-application
properties on the municipal register (section 27). Council stage with the applicant and consider introducing a
is now required to notify a property owner within 30 days process to secure the owner's agreement to achieve
of adding such property to the register. This new notice a less adversarial approach to heritage conservation.
requirement must include the following: Municipalities may also wish to require a heritage
a statement explaining whythe property is considered impact assessment as a requirement for a complete
to be of cultural heritage value or interest; application in order to receive research information on
a description of the propertythat is sufficient to readily a heritage property, especially if designation is likely to
ascertain where it is; be pursued and a NOID is anticipated. If the 90 days
a statement informing the owner of their right to does apply, it will be important for municipalities to
object;and ensure appropriate time management as there will
an explanation of the restriction concerning the be many tasks to complete in a short time period
demolition or removal of a building (60-day review such as heritage research, evaluation of the property
period). as to its heritage value, preparation of a Statement of
The notification requirement only applies to properties Significance/Heritage Attributes, and review by the
that are added to the register after July 1, 2021. If an owner municipal heritage committee prior to consideration of
objects to being listed,then within 90 days of the objection designation by council.
council must provide the owner with their decision as to
whether or not the property should remain on the register. Objections to NOID
An owner's opportunity to object is not limited to when the Once council approves a NOID, a new process will now
property was first included on the register (after July 1st). It allow for objections to be considered by council (as opposed
can occur at any time, by a current or future owner of the to the former process involving the Conservation Review
property. Board). Objections must be received by the municipality
Comment: The government has not provided any within 30 days of the date the NOID was published and
criteria to be considered when listing a property but has council is required to consider the objections it receives
suggested that municipalities be guided by Regulation when making its final decision to either withdraw the NOID
9/06 (Designation Criteria). There also does not appear or pass the by-law. This objection process applies to new
to be any limitation on the number of times an objection designations, amendments and repeal of a designation by-
can be submitted. In future, it will be important for law.
8 CHONEWS I COMMUNITVHERITAGEONTARIO.CA I SUMMER ETE 2021 Page 14 of 86
mu i "hH les� Au � tC� oeg�Commen4 ntetb 6
solely based on the designation criteria of Regulation 9/06 whereas there ADVERTISE IN CHOnews,
appears to be no such limitation on reasons for objections to the designation.
Reach a province-wide readership
Designation By-law Timelines composed of all Municipal Heritage
There is also a new time limit concerning the approval of the designation Committee members, heritage
by-law. Once a NOID has been published, a municipality is required to pass a societies, municipal officials, and
designation by-law within 120 days. If this does not occur,the NOID is considered heritage conscious individuals!
withdrawn and the municipality will have to issue a notice of withdrawal. This
120-day timeline applies to the following situations: DISPLAY ADS must be supplied in
all new designations camera-ready tiff or pdf format.
amendments to by-laws for administrative reasons CLASSIFIED ADS are $12.00 per
repealing by-laws column inch.
The 120-day timeline can be extended in three ways: if the property owner Location of ads is at the discretion
and council agree to an extension, if the municipality declares an emergency; of the Editor.Cost is per issue:
or if council passes a resolution indicating it has received 'new and relevant
information' pertaining to the property (which would provide 180 days from the Full Page $300
date of the council resolution to pass the by-law). Half Page $150
Comment: It appears the manner in which the owner agrees to an extension Third Page $100
is left to the discretion of the municipality. It will also be important for the Quarter Page $75
municipality to ensure adherence to the timeframe as to when the by-law One Sixth Page $50
must be placed before council. If the 120-daytimeline lapses and the NOID is
Business Card $25
withdrawn,there is no time limit on when the municipality may issue another
NOID.
Any appeal of council-approved designation by-lawwill be adjudicated bythe Contact Rick Schofield
Ontario Land Tribunal (OLT)and its decision will be final. The OLTwill also address 416.282.2710
appeals to amend or repeal a designation by-law, and applications to alter an schofieldcacommunityheritageontario.ca
individually designated property.
Designation By-law Requirements
There are also new requirements(as per the regulation)for specific information DISCLAIMER
to be included in a designation by-law. It must contain:
• The content of CHOnews
enhanced property identifiers
does not contain nor reflect
a statement of cultural heritage value or interest which outlines which of
any opinion, position, or
the regulation 9/06 criteria are applicable and how the property complies
influence of the CHO/
with the identified criteria.
• a description of heritage attributes including howeach attribute contributes PCO Board of Directors or
to the cultural heritage value or interest of the property.
the Editor of CHOnews.
The by-law may also list any physical features of the property that are not
Submissions received for
heritage attributes. These would not require council approval when an alteration publication in CHOnews
is proposed.
are changed only for the
While there is no requirement to update existing by-laws,where a municipality
purposes of legibility and
proposes to amend an existing by-law after July 1, the amending by-law must accuracy to the extent that
meet the new requirements.
can be readily determined.
Alteration and Demolition Applications
There are changes to the legislation and new regulations regarding alteration „
and demolition of individually designated properties. Changes were made to
section 34 of the Act to recognize the demolition or removal of heritage attributes W
that are not buildings or structures. Further, a municipality must now confirm W ibl,
that an application for alteration or demolition is deemed compete within 60 days W
of receipt (if the municipality fails to provide notice of a complete/in-complete ��aa��pp ((��ff ����-jj
SUMMER/ETE 2021 coMMUld'9AEl�AGEQNTARIo.CA I CHONEWs 9
application, theP�COmmametyb gesite tFinrio, CI- Qnerc g �tQuaeterltP�iblspatlfOnic frigSgeC7srpc
or
2r ...
days). There are also now minimum provincial submission determining if a process has commenced.
requirementsfor these types of applications(section 6 of the The regulation also requires that municipalities
regulation),and municipalities can also introduce additional address all outstanding NOIDs within 365 days of
requirements secured through a municipal by-law, council proclamation. This timeframe can only be extended
resolution or Official Plan policy. by mutual agreement. Where a matter was referred
Comment: One of the provincial requirements is the to the CRB or the OLT,whichever the case may be,the
submission of "all technical cultural heritage studies municipality will have 365 days from the date of the
that are relevant to the proposed alteration, demolition report to pass the by-law.
or removal'. It is unclear as to who determines what type Where a building or structure has been removed or
of study is considered "relevant". demolished following approval, but the municipality
If demolition or removal is approved, once it is complete, has not yet repealed the by-law as of July 1, 2021,
council is required to determine what impact the action municipalities are required to follow the steps outlined
has had on the property's cultural heritage value or interest in regulation.
or attributes. Upon reflection and review of the existing All ongoing cases that were before the CRB will now
designation by-law, council may choose to do nothing, be heard and ruled upon by the OLT.
amend the by-law or repeal it. In cases where council
determines that the by-lawshould be amended or repealed, Additional Sources
the regulation provides an abbreviated process that requires The Ontario Heritage Act(with amendments taking effect
fewer notifications and no opportunity for objections on July 1,2021) and Regulation 385/21 can be found here:
or appeals. The regulation also provides a streamlined https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/90o18#BK49
process for designation where a building or structure is Information for this article was obtained in part from the
being relocated to a new property, and there would be no Ministry of Heritage, Sport, Tourism and Culture Industries
opportunity to appeal the new designation. training session in June entitled "Changes to the Ontario
HeritageAct:What it meansforyou". Questions concerning
Transition the new legislative requirements can be directed to Kate
Here are some of the key transition policies: Oxley,Heritage Outreach Consultant at kate.oxley(a ontario.ca
Processes initiated on or after July 1, 2021, will be Regan Hutcheson is a member of the CHO/PCO Board of
subject to the new legislative and regulatory regime, Directors and is Manager of Heritage Planning for the City
while those initiated prior to this would be subject to of Markham.
processes under the Act as itwas prior to amendments
and regulation being proclaimed.
CITY ARCHITECTURE GOES VIRAL
City of Orillia Municipal Heritage Committee
Is it viral or virtual? While members of the City of Orillia phone'sApp Store. Each tour beginswith verbal and written
Municipal Heritage Committee (MHC) certainly hope instructions on how to use the program.The experience is
it goes viral, at the moment they are simply happy the equipped with a map of the area,with each building located
Heritage Walking Tour has gone virtual. using its GPS coordinates.While there is a suggested route,
The online version features 20 points of interest from the tour doesn't need to be completed in any particular
the City's list of designated properties under the Ontario order. You can either choose the building you would like
Heritage Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. 0.18, and is available at to learn more about (in a pick and play fashion) or turn the
https://www.tripvia.tours/ and on mobile devices through auto-play feature on and the app will automatically play the
their Tripvia Tours app. audio transcript asyou approach the landmark.Pairing your
Going virtual has many advantages. It improves phone toyour car's audio system is another way to enjoythe
accessibility,adds to the visitor experience,and reduces the experience. These hands-free features make the tour truly
need for physical maps. Not only does this help decrease accessible to all.
the City's environmental footprint, it is a safe and modern Members of the MHC recently took the app for a test run
alternative for residents and visitors to experience the City's and were happy with the results. Local walking tours are
architecture throughout the pandemic. a fascinating way to see a city during your travels. Visiting
The app is easy to use and free to download from your local landmarks and delving into the area's authentic tales
10 CHONEWS I COMM UNITYHERITAGEONTARIO.CA I SUMMER/ETE 2021 Page 16 of 86
4.a) Community Heritage Ontario, CHOnews, Quarterly Publication, Summer ...
is a great way to expand one's knowledge of a city and The Orillia MHC
its history within just a few hours. The app does just that, The M HC was established in 1977 asthe Local Architectural
and offers the option to answer trivia questions about the Conservation Advisory Committee (LACAC) and changed
buildings like "What was recently discovered to lead to the its name around 2005. The Committee designated its
Orillia Opera House?" first building, The Stephen Leacock Memorial House, on
Overall, the app adds a fun and humorous element to July 24, 1978, which later was declared a National Historic
the existing walking tour. Follow the link to get a glimpse: Site. In total,the MHC has designated 28 houses,churches,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=11GXeGecOrO and commercial/industrial buildings for their historical and
cultural significance.
x Over the last couple of years, the MHC has focused on
heritage awareness, designing story boards for St. James
Court, and French's Stand, a century-old concession stand
rheKran'ZSkxk located near Couchiching Beach Park. The Committee is
„ Rrw` focused on cataloguing over 680 archival photographs,
Thr tlu-'+i^4 Eua,tr ^4 m ran s+�
updating its potential properties of interest list, exploring
new designations, and developing educational tools for
realtors, insurers and the general public.
Ontario Heritage Conference 2022
June 23-25, 2022
Brockville and the Surrounding Region
,'he Light at the end crF the runnel
Heritage Elizabethtown-Kitley invites you to join us for the Ontario Heritage Conference in 2022. We are
excited about the return of this event and the chance to network and learn in beautiful Leeds and Grenville
County. Nestled between the St. Lawrence River and the Rideau Canal,the region is robust in United Empire
Loyalist and early Irish settlement history. Immerse yourself in excellent architecture, historic forts, rural
countryside backroads and the many attractions that await.
Speaker sessions, plenaries and tours will inspire Municipal Heritage Committee members and Heritage
Professionals.Get up to date on policy,trends and ideas.To spotlight the region's iconic heritage,OHC 2022's
theme The Light at the End of the Tunnel will focus on the economic impact of Pandemic times,the future of
heritage conservation,tourism and the positive changes of heritage locally and provincially.
NEWS FROM THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
RICK SCHOFIELD
As a result of the Pandemic, the Board continues to provincial lockdown;and
hold its Board meetings via Zoom, the latest being (iv) ongoing insurance issues relating to heritage
held on June 20th. properties.
The President outlined the work he has been doing for the The Corporate Secretary/Treasurer reported that many
past few months including: MHC renewals have finally been received but there are still
(i) working on a workshop for Pickering Council on their several outstanding. Hopefully,things will get back to semi-
role in heritage conservation; normal as Covid cases continue to decline.
(ii) issues of pitfalls regarding incomplete applications; Sincegovernment regulations require that our corporation
(iii) budget issues due to Covid-19 restrictions and the hold an AGM, the Pandemic issuesresulted in extension
ID SUMMER/ETE 2021 1 com0JI QI IEIIT77ARTOIaTARIO.CA I CHONEWS 11
4� Cm � � � ol � �ngOM2 � Ni�,r - l� a �t�Gr § mC r ls Hdia yvtwygh der
of AGM deadlin � re ea sed ...
AGM virtually on May 29. There were 16 MHCs logged in, MHC) and Wes Kinghorn (London MHC) and the Board of
which is typical of in-person AGMs in the past. Reports directors for the 2021-2022year.
were received from the President, Corporate Secretary/ The issue of a replacement for Bert Duclos to assist MHCs
Treasurer, and committee Chairs. Of concern to all MHCs with their ongoing activities was raised at last year's AGM
was the Conference Committee report that the next Ontario and again this year. Kate Oxley, representing the Ministry,
Heritage Conference will likely be held in June 2022. It will indicated responsibility for advisory services to MHCs (the
be hosted by the Elizabeth-Kitley MHC, possibly in the job formerly held by Bert Duclos) has been permanently
Brockville area. The CHO/PCO complete annual report for incorporated into the work of the Cultural Consultant
2020 was sent together with the Spring issues of CHOnews. positions at the Ministry. Mr. Andrew Jeanes and Mr. Chris
If your MHC did not receive a copy, please let us know. Lawless currently hold those positions at the Ministry, and
The Nominating committee submitted the names of are available to provide a full range of heritage advisory
Wayne Morgan (Sutton West), Regan Hutcheson (Markham services to local municipalities and MHCs throughout
MHC), Matthew Gregor (Toronto-Scarborough MHC) and Ontario. CHO/PCO members are invited to direct their
Tracy Gayda (Elizabeth-Kitley MHC)for election to the Board questions to them.
for 2021-23. There being no further nominations, all were Rick Schofield is the Corporate Secretary/Treasurer of
acclaimed and will join Ginette Guy (Cornell MHC), Terry CHO/pCo.
2021-2022 BOARD OF DIRECTORS
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE DIRECTORS
President Matthew Gregor
Wayne Morgan Scarborough 647.204.7719
Sutton West 905.722.5398 matthewgregor(a communityheritageontario.ca
waynemorgangDcommunityheritageontario.ca Regan Hutcheson
Markham 905.477.7000 Ext.2080
Vice-Presidents reganhutcheson(d)communityheritageontario.ca
Tracy Gayda Nancy Matthews
Toledo 613.275.2117 Grey Highlands 519.924.3165
tracygaydagDcommunityheritageontario.ca nancymatthews( communityheritageontario.ca
Ginette Guy Wes Kinghorn
Cornwall 613.935.4744 London 519.858.1900
ginetteguydcommunityheritageontario.ca wesking horn(a communityheritageontario.ca
Chair of Finance Corporate Secretary/Treasurer
Terry Fegarty Rick Schofield
Waubaushenen 705.538.1585 Scarborough 416.282.2710
terryfegarty(acommunityheritageontario.ca schofield(acommunityheritageontario.ca
Program Officer Ginette Guy
BOARD MEETINGS ARTICLE DEADLINES
CHO/PCO Board of Directors meetings are JANUARY10
open to any MHC member. Meetings will MARCH 10
be held virtually until further notice. Please JUNE 10
contact the Corporate Secretary if you wish OCTOBER 10
to attend. Article submissions are always welcome.
12 CHONEWS I COMMUNITYHERITAGEONTARIO.CA I SUMMER/ETE 2021 Page 18 of 86
5.a) Catherine McCarroll, Intermediate Planner re, Rail Trail Designatio...
Verbal Matters
_.0e:4 %
(Section 13.3 of Township's
0Twnshipof Procedural By-Law No. 2015-203)
Proud Heritage,Exciting Future
Name: Catherine McCarroll
Item Number/Name: Rail Trail Designation
Meeting Date: October 18, 2021
Motion No.:
Type of Meeting: ❑ Council ❑ Special Council
❑ Development Services Committee
❑ Accessibility Advisory Committee
X❑ Heritage Committee
❑ Human Resources Committee
Speaking Notes:
• The Heritage Consultant has asked that we narrow down the scope of the research for the
Cultural Heritage Assessment of the Township's Rail Trail.
• Are there any specific features (original culverts, bridges, rails...) or locations that should
be included in the Cultural Heritage Assessment?
10/15/21
Page 19 of 86
5. herine McCarroll, Intermediate Planner re: Index of Register of ...
Appendix B
Township of
Proud Heritage,Exciting Future Township of Oro-Medonte
Cultural Heritage Resource Evaluation Form
Address: 1933 Old Barrie Road East
Period: 1945
Recorder Name: Catherine McCarroll
Description: Rugby Cemetery
Photographs: Front Facade o Left Facade o Right Facade o
Rear Facade ❑ Details ❑ Setting o
Date:
October 15, 2021
Design of Physical Value
Style Is this a notable, rare or unique N/A ❑ Unknown No ❑ Yes ❑
example of a particular
architectural style or type?
Construction Is this a notable, rare, unique N/A Unknown No Yes
or early example of a particular
material or method of
construction?
Design Is this a particularly attractive or N/A Unknown No Yes
unique structure because of the
merits of its design,
composition, craftsmanship or
details?
Does this structure N/A Unknown No Yes
demonstrate a high degree of
technical or scientific
achievement?
Notes:
Contextual Value
Continuity Does this structure contribute N/A Unknown No Yes
to the continuity or character
of the street, neighbourhood
or area?
1
Page 20 of 86
5.b) Catherine McCarroll, Intermediate Planner re: Index of Register of ...
Township of Oro-Medonte Appendix B
Cultural Heritage Resource Evaluation Form
Contextual Value (Continued)
Setting Is the setting or orientation of N/A Unknown No Yes
the structure or landscaping
noteworthy?
Does it provide a physical, N/A Unknown No Yes
historical, functional or visual
link to its surroundings?
Landmark Is this a particularly important N/A Unknown No Yes ❑
visual landmark within the:
❑ County;
❑ Township; or,
❑ neighbourhood?
Completeness Does this structure have N/A Unknown No Yes
other original outbuildings,
notable landscaping or
external features that
complete the site?
Notes:
Integrity
Site Does the structure occupy its N/A Unknown No Yes
original site?
Note: if relocated, i.e.
relocated on its original site,
moved from another site, etc.
Alterations Does this building retain most N/A Unknown No Yes
of its original materials and
design features?
Is this a notable structure due N/A Unknown No Yes
to sympathetic alterations that
have taken place over time?
2
Page 21 of 86
5.b) Catherine McCarroll, Intermediate Planner re: Index of Register of ...
Township of Oro-Medonte Appendix B
Cultural Heritage Resource Evaluation Form
Integrity (Continued)
Condition Is this building in good N/A Unknown No Yes
condition?
Notes:
Historical or Associative Value & Significance
Does this property or structure have strong N/A Unknown No Yes
associations with and/or contribute to the
understanding of a belief, person, activity,
organization or institution that is significant or
unique within the City?
Is the original, previous or existing use N/A Unknown No Yes
significant?
Does this property meet the definition of a Unknown No Yes
significant built heritage resource or cultural
heritage landscape, as identified in the
Provincial Policy Statement under the Ontario
Planning Act?
A property or structure valued for the
important contribution it makes to our
understanding of the history of a place, an
event, or a person.
Names of the Original Owners:
Notes:
3
Page 22 of 86
5.b) Catherine McCarroll, Intermediate Planner re: Index of Register of ...
Township of Oro-Medonte Appendix B
Cultural Heritage Resource Evaluation Form
Further Action/Follow Up
a Add to Heritage Register
❑ High Priority for Designation
❑ Heritage District Potential
❑ Additional Research Required
❑ Additional Photographs Required Setting ❑ All Facades ❑ Details ❑
❑ Request Permission to Access Property
Other:
General Comments
This is a privately owned cemetery which is operated by the Township of Oro-Medonte.
Date of Property Owner Notification:
Property Owner Name and Address:
■ Additional Information Attached
Attached Photos
Recommendation
Heritage Committee Recommendation Council Decision
Add to Heritage Register Add to Heritage Register
7 No Action — Keep on File No Action — Keep on File
Date: Date:
Notice of Collection: Information on this form is collected for the purposes authorized
under the Municipal Act 2001 , s. 8; in addition to heritage preservation, information
will be used to enhance municipal services being delivered to applicants or as the
applicant my require. All information is subject to the provisions of the Municipal
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act, R.S.O. 1990, c M56. Questions
about this notice of collection should be directed to the Clerk's office at 705-487-2171
Revised June 2019
4
Page 23 of 86
.ii ' {
jA x � 11 r y
��..-Of ! ��'
�,'�'-... [ �'�`� _, 1 +`Jaf►`': �.r� 't'``' ...'1F 1i"`^ '�`' 1�ZK%�"5�� LJ '7 t _�' _ ,1'. �,,.
•"
or
.� 4� r�i.t. ,�.,��pw. �� it 35�► �..r�' ; -� `��[[f 'y K._.. 1'. fir ��, / -
x.
s 1i' 1 i
Y.
fl i i
fk
r
41,
041 ,
WA'�w�
kA. l,'. i�'-/ 6'� •j- t t' "�. F �'� _ �` -i' �%� i'j'
Al
Zor
��� ., k_ � ?� �j�.�'a�S'.: Sir ,,` M }; ! 1 f ,•:!1 ,, -
Ar
IN
1 �
-
1
ter,,/ \ yq� �<•, ,.1 ,
I,
4 Ir A
-
_
1 �� fl P ."Jb • I� �� � � nF 4,
t4.
x17
,/ ��:a � � 'Ct � � � �Y�• J-'�' ,rP^, it � .p- '� - Y ^�
� Nt
t 4 e ♦ 11
P Kr� �, /�1 u� 4�(r�l k`, �/.; ptn � '��i-rv� Y�+►�K r:4 !1- . � r� ,�� `� _, f r
A` a �- ��1 i;r F1 i y, Y,'. W�f;J r t,.` I� S i ,Y t •t r� _ !• �t �.
4r. ti >t :k.<� �t'F r t 5- i �• 071
-
1 37 �
If
'� ♦ ;. �` .01
ni
Ser
f
yam,
I
s t—F
� Y;��Yd�ri%� 1_✓�:O ,�' - �` �� �-.—l-W], �i.FA 1�i''S-�_ .�` �• `.1 �. .
�p ntermedia 3. y dex.of Registerof ..N
� b k,•{ _ �� �2" y:\i M 1 �• .� r rx�
,F^ #4 :,: .s R � � - - � ,,>. ,x.•y a `:, �i" � � i
S -r"Y� � _. ��� s � �. � :� �? a •> .at }y �, a �% �4l'� �1
'� �� : fir,: .�;�, �. _ ",�'� �� ;. '� ����,-�•� a
Vy �r
cOw
J //}gyp . h
h fl�
'ii1l�Kair�
It
tYl
�-.'W—P-1
JJ
Ll
r
l i�
\ Y ♦9�'lfi`�
ai�li .i1
g \ \ .y ''i✓ Fs'acS: icy°
e�
°
,
1 I 41• C In
,
WPM—
n
• a .. _ _ .. Fes.. J• .. 7. n_ ," � �..
•• ��# a �• .r
_
i
1� •.. k, a. r .•—ate - � 4• -.f
„z
• F 1'. •1r ,J
yY�1{V'
r u
"
10
°� •,�._ •e .' 1 , -."tip ,. �, -
o n
.
a[ _
�. i k
e •`� v. J` F r_
1 ..
eti ••ee
a _
a
r. F• 1� F �
- �J� - � ' `;s�Ser...`— earl _••�If.
9
rt
r
i.�ea •d _ „�� •ter I
,
_ 4 •
L �1
_ a
f ,
Al
it
_ -nk
.e: ri i
9
L r° rJ
j Rugby Cemetery Signag...
LL
mediate Planner re.
F >
` -.yf
.4,R 4
w.
�J� ' S
N
I
1 I V
I��INj
_ Wyk t
JL
SO
y2 4
1 ��
2.. ,-w".._`cam �V-� �' t�; •_' •' ,a' ��,
"
ytir+`� +�� �s ... � ;.��4 ,� � - �.•� � R_,�n� . Fed _ r��
{y
raga '
� W
_ � o
i =
O •,-w
•
i
CL
LZ
r •-
�� i o
i
•� b
CL CL
000, O
Q
cc a
iE >
NIEMEN
L.4.
i 13.
•IMMEN
i
I
O
I E
L
O
y
U.
r
y �'4 O O O
C C C
k Qo c ()0 c ()0 c
M
°
_ 0 C _
loop, • d i CL
a L O
L _
O L E
al t >
d E 0 a U41) . L-
E
•N
N
LL
"v
a
� = v
to c C� Q
V N C i t c
> ° a� °Ln
a L E
s ._ t t L cai t t O •i
}' N O a U a U cm = a
O �1� m • .
� U m c �
L L E W c � L V c 'o
_ -a cn M = H 0 Q = H
LL
.N O 0 ,°
0 :EO
a
_ m _
5.e) Catherine McCarroll, Intermediate Planner re, Ministry of Heritage,...
Verbal Matters
(Section 13.3 of Township's
rownship )f Procedural By-Law No. 2015-203)
Proud Heritage,Exciting Future
Name: Catherine McCarroll
Item Number/Name: Heritage Conservation in Ontario — Training Session held on June 22,
2021
Meeting Date: October 18, 2021
Motion No.:
Type of Meeting: ❑ Council ❑ Special Council
❑ Development Services Committee
❑ Accessibility Advisory Committee
�5 Heritage Committee
❑ Human Resources Committee
Speaking Notes:
• The Ministry of Heritage, Sport, Tourism, and Culture Industries hosted a training session on
Heritage Conservation in Ontario on June 22, 2021 .
• The presentation addressed items such as:
o What is heritage;
o Benefits of heritage conservation;
o Legislative tools (Ontario Heritage Act, municipal register— listing and designating
properties, Municipal Heritage Committees);
o Policy context (Provincial Policy Statement, Planning Act and Environmental
Assessment Act)
o Non-legislative tools (education, heritage promotion)
• The presentation reviewed a number of the changes to the Ontario Heritage Act which were
beneficial from staff's perspective, such as: items to include in the designation By-law, changes to
the alteration and demolition application process, amending By-laws, objections to Council,
appeals to the Ontario Land Tribunal (OLT), heritage easement agreements and heritage financial
incentives.
• The slides have been attached for your reference. If you have any questions, we can discuss
them during the meeting.
10/15/21
Page 31 of 86
5.e) Catherine McCarroll, Intermediate Planner re: Ministry of Herit
■
i
O
8�
L
M
r
0
r
r
� OU a--+
_0 •� •-
4=1 C6
M Q
E .—
N •U
.� L c:
~ N C
Q O 0
V �
� o
O }a ca
� L L.L O
Page 32 of 86
5.e) Catherine McCarroll, Intermediate Planner re: Ministry of Heritage,...
0 � -0 O M
c: -0 >
Ln a) c 0
O }, � M O
° o °' =3 o o
� a�
•� c:
� _
.0 ~ '�
U O •—
v O _ w
O O
� �. U 'O
0 O � �
}, O — -0
O +-' O O
O � '— (� — i
i -0
O c:
Q o M
40 v, cn
`~ O cn
O •_
O O '� +� 0
.-
Vf `� -0 -0 U H c Q -0 -c
N
Page 33 of 86
5.e) Catherine McCarroll, Intermediate Planner re: Ministry of Heritage,...
0
• • O,
r C
0 C3
� N
N
U
.-
C6
cr
- E O aio
ca O ca
rO ate-J
U U C6
Q �
� — N
O •N •�
ca N
Ov
.— ca — O
N �
r
_, ca ate-J >` N
M •— i
ca
T N U -0
L N O
a--+ N N
U Q O
O Q
O O
4 r
N 3
.N O O N O
^c 0- U .�
U bA
O }, `� L
a--+ c:
un N -0
a)
O z Q i
m
Page 34 of 86
5.e) Catherine McCarroll, Intermediate Planner re: Ministry of Heritage,...
O
Ec
.
r.
0
O
ONEEN
LM
O
V
M
4-J
i
s
c�
CL
• • V
O �
E N
O X H
4-J
> O O O •�
a� W >
> V •—
E •— •—
O_ � —
O a� '� a°
•c IMEON� - N
L '> s c a� s O
0 0 H Z
a a
Tt
Page 35 of 86
5.e) Catherine McCarroll, Intermediate Planner re: Ministry of Heritage,...
ca
O
.� c:
0
4- 0
O c:
V'f O
4=1 E ru
M
Ja
� c:
O
� U
Page 36 of 86
Intermediat r n ` I `. g e) Catherine IIGGIrroll, f ry of H rita e,...
y
_ ,, f:
r-
a�
v
i Tl
W:
W,a _
I' f
f
c6 a--+
.N _&— l�A
•L
o
L D N N a N �O
s CU w cu
o p u
to a�
ca O T m ca > a
N bn O O CAA
+� N O •� +, 'L L N •Q mp
� COm CO �•� 0 Z3 + cn Q U cn �O
L
_ m > " Page 3*7 of 86
5.e) Catherine McCarroll, Intermei te Phan try of Heritagift
0
o
w
v
cu
v
cu
yy L
I c�
G
O
i
P
L
Ln
O "' s
CL
E tab V _� v CL o -
C6 S U Q
IAA U E .N O
CL
O
O .� O —
D CO
H
Ln 4-
N
0 o � m Q � .� o =5
� N
O qA U
• 3 v p cn 2 E
cn v cn O O > O
cn —
� OE Ln
O 4A
N +S+ U N N Nam., O O 4A
qA •� v p (B (B U u N
s
U S fB LLI fB LOL N U .p
F O
U Page 38 of 86
5.e) Catherine McCarroll, Intermediate Planner re: Ministry of Heritage,...
cu
CAA
N ru
•— O_
Q � •
o O
O c:
}� O
E ca
N (D
J
� O
Page 39 of 86
5.e) Catherine McCarroll, Intermediate Planner re: Ministry of Heritage,...
� I 0
,
.. ,. AL.
U
0 v +�
4J '>
~ a u o
.o `^
i
4-1 ~
°o , tZ0
= a a) ca
O •� .� C .� > }' p
�° � a c°� �> � 0
x
oCA 0
p •�
V F- z°
Page 40 of 86
5.e) &therine Mccarroll, Intermediate Planner re: Ministry of Heritage,...
M >,
+r —
p •� •0
•— '> M
N 0
Q
i p O
GJ �
O
C
� aA
O }, 'nn
� a �
.O cn
i
GJ rn O Q
N r-I O O
C Q O
U N
� � O O
0 O Q s O
•i cV O v '�
x O Q s
•ate--+ U J a--' Q
v }' + O O s
v o 0
os �
4A O O U
ate+ E v p v p v Q v v
•i (B qA a--' M i O qA c (B 4A
N Q) }, fB > O N (B S (B (B
V t a--+ N O Ln
O Q — U O '� p cn
(B (B O U E O
V U 'i C3A cn O4-0 Ln
'� O (� •
LM
Ln
M a
a-o aA v - v Q- Ln OCL
s
Ln
L + E N N N O a--+
a — O O O a.., aA 0 cn
CC_ LU
E w O O
0 Page 41 of 86
5.e) Catherine McCarroll, Intermediate Planner re: Ministry of Heritage,...
L
N
cu
N � ru
•— O_
O a� •
M
�O 0
c:
O c:
}+ O
M
Eru
N r
4� s a� c:
FMO
Page 42 of 86
5.e) Catherine McCarroll, Intermediate Planner re: Ministry of Heritage,...
O
i O J
> 4J cc O
•� i
^ �
_� 0 � •O
U � U i_ U p cn v
cn }, O � N �
beA ca Q 0 -0
}+
45
ice •— c: a)
p � N
� O 4� O � O
v L- > Imca 4A cc
ca
v 3 O c: v � '>
O Q }+ � aJ
O C) 'ago 'L— a
UO >- ateJ � _0 .� O a-J .N70
M _C 4-+ � i N O W a)
Q Cc
EW 0 •Q� � cn � cn U N
MENNENO N � 4J (� 'a � aA i E
or DL — ---, 0
M p EU� • O cn i 00
Q � i N +� N i
J � c� 0 � O � � ca �
O NpELE F—
Page 43 of 86
5.e) Catherine McCarroll, Intermediate P*qaip try f Heritage,...
0
E
+� E
O
U
L
E N
a--+
N O 4
•� ate-+ U O
DC r�A4-1
f� ca
CL +-�
V_ a-J > _0
c: too
O i
N 0 Q
a� O
S 4
0 _ N O
O O O U
N N '� >_ U Q
DJ -0 0 O O O — Q � N
N _ O
� � � � E � Q Q � N CAA
U
J O U Q •
m
Page 44 of 86
5.e) Catherine McCarroll, Intermediate Planner re: Ministry of Heritage,...
a� .0
4-0 _0 .
N N �
4, +-+ O +-+
cn
cn 4 O O +J
U_ N O }' �
• N_ 0 cn
4-0
.-
4-0 ate-+ C6 •Q O 'w Q N
•— •� N i O Q
DJ c .0 —, N O O
C6 0 � -c �
O O
• a E Q "'' N
•CL >- CUD
_ OU O
.�
O
C�0 ca
: N
0 �. a••+ _ 'i ca ate--+
dJ � � N O � -0 O �
— _�
O Q ° U U
a"'
ru Q N •— •� O O O
N . . _
V -0 � O E O � O
•— txO on
0 i N .—In M>, a••'
0 •N ra Cam-+ = � ° O
> U E _0
> L 0 C6 C6 Lj O U N
C6 E r O O O " O N
rM V a) a) •� — UUUZ O � U -0
J O rM E -o 4-1
Tt
Page 45 of 86
5.e) Catherine McCarr e Planner re: Ministry of Heritage,...
c
0
.T
i
aA _�
N j N
O •tU0 •i •� O N = cn
f a O — L c.�
.V .� O 0
�, O
— N •U }, a••+ _0 Q
� O •� N N � N
•gyp Q. Q
._ N cn O +j i ca +j
N N " � a) -0
S }' }' Q NMENNEN 4-0
ca
V a-+ i i i � .p U
0 Q O N N - " ca
0 0 _0 0 QQ i O 4- •Q
0
Q
.NEEN -0 OU M �
_ Q c O
ru c: �0 � -0 Nv � O O
� O C � a✓ O O " (A },lflO.� N ca(n }, Q
.� L — —
w�I a) E O •v a� O � N
CL
O oCL U E i � o o
L.V m -0 U LL ca ca CL -0 m
Ln
Page 46 of 86
5.e) Catherine McCarroll, Intermediate Planner re: Ministry of Heritage,...
i
v� 4� ru
.-
O a� '-
O O � �
H c:
a ° O
O
._ }+ O c:
}+ M o
M
> ._ r �
� � 0 0
� � U
Page 47 of 86
5.e) Catherine McCarroll, Intermediate Planner re: Ministry of Heritage,...
O
Ec
4J .
O r.
O
.>_ cc c: cc
. .
._
0
al
O
•N c Q - c:
bA
. a
- O _
coCL O
CL U bA •—
0 c +5
a �O >
U co ca O
a) O >
ca _ ._
N (D > •—
Vf ++ M O
O •V of
O "
O �, s >
•O a O _
� a � X
_
N •O cn }, +J +>+ = O
M L) N (D -0
a••+ Q N Q
J O O O
0 U Q .— cn
Page 48 of 86
5.e) C I, 1 ` mediate Planner re: Ministry of Heritage,...
0
< M
C t CO
4-J ._
M
C
.b
4J C: OCL
cn
a_+ C
O Q
L *� O 0 ..—
I�
�
CL L 4-J 4-0
L Q c: O +-+
a O Co O C:
0 i Qcc
� 0 i i 0
cc
0 tO � QN
C: 0 C: = Co C: cc Z
> O �' O O cc
cc Co
N . . L Q Q) .�A 0
V N 0 � +� ) Q N ca N
Fm
bA C: 0 co O O C: aJ :
= Q O O cc OU 0 � � c >
M bA _ N Q N N N O cn
.� L N U i cc i i i c N
,> 0 Q U Q ,> Q Q Q c
co
Page 49 of 86
5.e) Catherine McCarroll, Intermediate Planner�re. M�y of Heritage,...
" Oi T
O
�i
O
bA
N
cn b-0
c: 0 cc
i O •— i
i a
CL
O 0 or O O
•� ate--+ � b-0
f� c: >- v O
O co
a✓
MENNEN
V a� •� O Ov
O
� U � •v L ,�
N
•�
ca a-J
i
MENNEN
O i
.� •i O -
� � E
� � �
J O •
Page 50 of 86
5.e) Catherinri� MAI Intermediate Planner re: Ministry of Heritage,...
O
C
C
O
L ::
T
C +s
UO
• O
� � a • � � � O t�0
cc 4=0 (a) •cc
+•+ 0 i f a cn }, 4J
O cc Q +.+ cc
-0 0) Q +Q•+ •U 0 U
N
0 C: co N � �uf C: C: �Q
co E
a co
te
co MENNEN
cr
O
V O �� CL ; O
C: z � O O 4-J0
4-J Q +J �A Q U i
_ UO �Q v +-+ cc 0 4J 0
•— M M 60
MENNEN C:
J c s °T'
O •— T • • • • • • r4
Page 51 of 86
5.e) Catherine McCarroll, Intermediate Planner re: Ministry of Heritage,...
O
.c
O .�
O N
a) u O O
.0 buo
a-+
O
� O � •-
a�
a�
O
O -r- —
i >
4-0 '>Low bn
—
0 U
XCL —
O N N O O U N
Low 0 � > N M
a O .— =3 _r_ —
J — by p cn
=3 ate-J ate--+ t
v O Q O 4A t-0 � -0 U
'Q) O 2 Co O
E
o o c� t n
Q ca cn — cn t p =3
Q •UQj
•2 O
cn Q O
O
+_+ ca � � �
N Q Q � � O O ow
0
N
Page 52 of 86
5.e) Catherine McCarroll, Intermediate Planner re: `Iin� f tage,...
+� p
O Q -
LW M
O ays '
.MO �, �•
O
p cn O
N a--+
p O Q ca
O > N O N
CU
cu N E U a✓
O a- O O
N (� U U O E U
cr
_ N0 0 _ N
A)
cu
O +.+
� � U � f6 cn O p �
Vf + O M v O Ln
O
V �j cu 0 N N N p a i �,
+, p _ a) a)
bA a ago o � o O
'i O aU ao ca ca
+-+
}a (V N O p ca ca N i
a✓
CL m ca '�
4-J (1) .lap ate-+ cu a) a)
N
N
Page 53 of 86
5.e) Catherine McCarroll, Intermediate Planner re: Ministry of Heritage,...
O
M
4-J
i
90 N
i
a� L o c: _ —
p O •o ccOcc
+� c
LM
+� � � •Q � •gip � —�-+
f� •—
Co c: Cci
'— cn U i . .
•�. 0 ateJ
.� i i 0 O >
c .— N
) 0 0 •� >
CL co
oa v � � �,o (1) � +J Cc O aJ
0 a� r. , � � � C •U L
s a •- �, .- >. }, U
> 9 c 0 0
M •- X
•O a ca � w .� O 40
•N i w O M wcn
M 4-+ Q M }, E
*� 0 2 U
m
N
Page 54 of 86
5.e) Catherine McCarroll, Intermediate Planner re: Ministry of Heritagkft
O
.
c c
cc . . aJ O
}, ^n O
0 4-J _0
-0 U l0 •v 4J
9� a) O 0 .� a)Q Q
i
0 0 O
Q 0 Q N
._ O U _0
5 cc
�. 0 w> 0
a-J
ca �
N Cc O o
a � � •� 2 cad
N O cc +-+
Q U •-
a) 0a--+ Q co
f ' Q a--+ cn ateJ ca
O .�
o +�
O 'i > '� 4-J
N 'i •i +-' O 00 a) +-' a)
or -,,, = =; = 0
4-+ N Q U U Ln U
0 •
Tt
Page 55 of 86
5.e) Catherine McCarroll, Intermediate Planner re: Ministry of Heritage,...
E 0
O •—
`~ M
E
U 4A CAA' p
(� ate-+ 4-1Ln ate-J
+-+ Q H
i �_ _ O 4A U Q � ,O
0 -0U bn " O
p cn O cn O
a •� � cn �' � � � � 00
"M
� � �•� ate-+ � � c � a--+ � � � � � •�
� U � �
4-0
� O bA ate--+ O N —
O > U O Q O > Q
0 V O a✓ O N U O •� O t
0 Q 0 �' E O� O O U 0 Q. 4-1
Q ,cn
4-1 � � '� •� +-+ ate•' O 0
0 •� � � _ � N � � v w � � � ca M
•—
4� O � o • � � � � � � 0Q� � �
J0 a OU ocn � � �7 �' zc� +- �
Ln
• • • Pate 56 of 86•
5.e) Catherine McCarroll, Intermediate Planner re: Ministry of Heritage,...
4— _0
O ca
cn ca
0 p C�0 can M
O
E N ate--+ _
a--'
4-0
ate-+ � �' � � � •0 �
cn N ca U O j O +-+
. •� '� atej U 0
U Q 0 >
0
p 4-j 0 4 N
4-
4-0 >. M ca U U OCL a) N
v Q N O +_+
O O O a) O � _ > +_+
a a � � +� -0 a)Ln
c: -* � � ° 7
>o —M -a m
0 C, C) j
M E 4-j
N . . OU •0 ate--+ �
�, Q. O � cn O `�
O
LM +r
C +5
J O a
N
Page 57 of 86
5.e) Catherine McCarroll, Intermediate Planner re: Ministry of Heritage,...
Ln c .0
O tZ0 .Ln
v � 'v 0 U p
� O O O � U � O
a Q p 4
N Q U a—+ — O C6
O '� O Ln cn
.� _�
_ L U
4-j Ln
4
- w 0
a) ELn 0 O O
�O Q c_n O � p •— Q
' + ate-+
_ ca N
O 11 a� p `�' too
p E � U W
. 0
Q 0 � Q
p O U •EW
X
._
O = '� — N ca cn
M p
N O O U
V Ln
O Q -0 ~ +-+ Ln 4-jN E ro
O � O
Q — ca
0 N 4-jU C N N w 0
._
'i La.
O 4-j ate.., � Ln4-j
cn ca
N .� ♦=buo U '� can '� N O Q
4-0
c a — " � -C CO ca ca cn O
J ci O o • • N
Page 58 of 86
5.e) Catherine McCarroll, Intermediate Planner re., try of Heritagkftft
0
.
a
0 9.
O � � — ca
=3 .v a-'
a-+ u ago '> .�
i N O
(L) c i � N
0O Q ) oLnoca ca .�' � a� � � ca
+-j >
o �
— a) +c �
-�
p o �
N � =3 o •
Ocu w UQ) E- E � � �
0 " N� " a) � NM00 U° c� a�
�� L ♦"+ 0 +� _ QUA
_ +� ago � >
Q
c.� o �� c � �� � � � Co .No
0 Q N � +� Ems' °' �� °� % E M ��
0 aAca ca U 0
cam _ � � '— Oc� � •4-0
� dA �
0 r- .— � MN � •O
Ln
co co +r ca
o �
MENNEN co.0 �' •� cn °; .N� � Q �o QUO Q �°�
,N � � � _ —
O � ° �pc: a
E -cE � (Do �
J 0 Q Ica -0U "
00
Page 59 of 86
5.e) Catherine McCarroll, Intermediate Planner re: Ministry of Heritagkft
O
a� .
ap
p O �
ca ca
.0 .0 cn O
� Q N O O
L U
O O p O CL >.
0 N N
+�
a O +� _ •N
U (� a-J
L
—O Q O
.> p O —
._
U U 'N
•� O •� ate--+
V V p E O 'w O O
O Q O -0 �O �O
O � � 4- O a--+ can � c:
> 'i a..+ O `�' 'Q) p Zj
O ca
_ _ U — _ —
Q
p •0 O ca U •� O O O
GEMEN 4-0cn � O O cn N ! i N _r
0 0
N
Page 60 of 86
5.e) Catherine McCarroll, Intermediate Planner re: Ministry of Heritagkft
_0 U �zl- M
C6 .
a) �, }, •�
ate--+ tU0 O .�
� O -0E U
NE E _0 O
N O
0 Q U _0 " 4-
•� _0 a) _ '=3 O
♦-0 Q
J >
O 'u - O
.aA a)
U Q N
Q O .v a) _ O +�-+
N O N E .0 O Q �
bb
.N LA 0
.0 'U C6
E 'c� O Ou Ou O ca
ca ru
O 'N O -0 +-' +_+ U
N � N
O O N O � Q -
N
N -0 i O ate--+ •cn
}, N N N ca 0
U O N � ; O N ca
V O ca O O U -
QN +-+
� ca '� ate--+ Q 6— Q Q Q � '� N D E '� .0
0
N E O +j
0 C6 L • • • • • • O
•i o N N
� 4-0 VO U .�
C
0 Q 0
m
Page 61 of 86
mediate Planner re: Ministry of Heritage,...
0
Ec
a�
4-0 �
(� V
4-5
1 O O `A 3:
V O
�•— (3)
5.e) Catherine McCarroll, Intermediate Planner re: Ministry of Heritage,...
4=1 N
.� 4=1
L
Z �
. . E txO
N � ru
• 0—
O
L �
p �p +�
a 4-
00c:
> L- .-
o c:
}+ o
EEru
N r
M a� c:
J W o
Page 63 of 86
5.e) Catherine McCarroll, Intermediate Planner re: Ministry of Heritage,...
0
Ec
.
r.
cc _ .0 0
4J U � ate-+
N N c:
*-' O
O cc
CL
_ bA
•-
4 _
0
co c:
a) Ln
O
0 cn
'CAA cc c:
2 cr ca c
•U
W 4J
E
O L)cc a)
�
0 �J9 _0 .O
� c O�� Cc
0 > co � Co � � > >
i •— +�
� t�10 ca E 0 C:L },
� 0 >, O cc L- = U �
40a x V >' co 0
ca i i N N
M � +' i iJ > ate) E Q aA t�A
q _0 to
� ateJ (� Q (�
4-0
r > CL Q 2 2
J02
m
m
Page 64 of 86
5.e) Catherine McCarroll, Intermediate Planner re: Ministry of Heritage,...
r
O
. . > txO
ru
N L
•—
O a�
N �
O +1-+
O o
4� V c:
N O c:
�+ *, a� .o
MM ,V ca
N i >
•- (D
L N a�
c:
� o
Page 65 of 86
5.e) Catherine McCarroll, Intermediate Planner re: Mini I e,...
Q bD
aA ;
4-0O -C N
�. cn V U N
.� },
L N
4-+ •ca ate--+ �
Vf Q •� —0
.� z O •� _
•E Q o ��
c� _
•U
O4-0 a) ate--+ N . .
i a) •�
O N N ca O N v O
V u a N }' � � a, O
CAA
o � c� o
L O 4-J C�0 N U • j a~ N tZ0
(n . .
♦..� .j a=+ cn
O V 'c� o _ O N O O - O
Q O ua� x
.75
u
o
i > O ". cLn O vi N cn ca
•N ca N E a� O cn
4-0 = U O
J O vi ,n
m
Page 66 of 86
5.e) Catherine McCarroll, Intermediate Planner re: Ministry of Heritage,...
O
.
aA o O
+� ca
aA alp O
.N
� !E
E O .
+_+ U
N E =3
� =3
N Q -0 � aA
O U
O =3
alp , N =
O Q •� 3 N �
Lee •� O
One " � N U
= O O 2 .0
_r aA ca
ca a--' � ca �
O o 06 o o obuO 0 -0
•� N C ate-+ Q � � U . . � 0 � •�
bA •� O � � U O O •i ca O +, •cn
,N 0- .— _ -0 � +, p — O
Q � m � 0 N �
ca >- O O
_ O
_ O
o V
s CL
m
Page 67 of 86
5.e) Catherine McCarroll, Intermediate Planner re: Ministry of gift
c IV
j 0
S er
O = ._
V =3 Q
[ M1�
�g!
W kfi�i
a--+ �w a1 a
b , ! _ '
[� �, } ro o
�+ O E .
.N Q) -0
> N cn
0 tw > •0
• ca ' U
bn
• O ca
L C6
Ij
r --
+N+ cn U
X .
0 > N -0 N
tw
txO O •� t Nil
a v 0
M (1) Q O cad � Ir
}+ oc bn
•i co 0 O
i E E
_
S n
Page 68 of 86
5.e) Catherine McCarroll, Intermediate Planner re: Ministry of Heritage,...
L
N
Z � �
. . > txO
Vf ca
O
O � �
H oc:
r 4- o
c:
— o c:
*.+ O
M
Eru
ru
a� c:
� � O
Page 69 of 86
5.e) Catherine McCarroll, Intermediate Planner re: Ministry of Heritage,...
O
Pr;,
L X
N O a--+
> N a-J
ca
•� "
4-+ E ate-+
.— c �
—
i Q
� O N O
_ Q
O •� E -0 Q) N
�_ ca •— 00
•V O L- O O
O Q N 00
c O O N � •� O
I.L � '� Q
N . . N N +-+
V O N (0 c�n � Qc: — O
O Q J cn Q+� N O O •c� cn ,
CAA M +� U O �
CL
4� r. 0 O
0 .
� a
• • m
Page 70 of 86
5.e) Catherine McCarroll, Intermediate Planner re: Ministry of Heritage,...
cu
. .
N ru
4 .— O
4- 0
-�e c:
o
}+ CL .°
•— E E cu
N r
O a) c:
0
V �
Page 71 of 86
5.e) Catherine McCarroll, Intermediate Planner re: Ministry of Heritage,...
0
O M
a�
t� p = b •v
7 =3
a ° 0 a) E
=3
v
•— o
E _ — co
E 'i O > O
a) -
bA a) o4-0 i
_ U
° b i � °
16 + cn
� ca � Q
ONO a--+ a-�+ a-0 bnte-+ ate-+
•CL o � 0 0- � -a tw o f
.V .p O p i O •to ca •gin U N
U —_ L �
cn .0 p .0 Q_ - N 0 -0 O
N
MENNEN V O w v •> U w ca � to E Q)
.—
i
U
• c� Q) � ooVaoaa �' w •�
4-+ +, a) >
0 w ci Q
Tt
• Page 72 of 86 •
5.e) Catherine McCarroll, Intermediate Planner re: Ministry of Heritage,...
O
AN O
a c16. -
T
N "YF
E •-
E
O f. .
V cn
W
4A �
'i
O
co
i
to
MENNEN °• • ~
♦-+ = N i
O Q c� E
O °
M4-0
'� U
�+ U U
Ln O
dJ
_ — Q � >
M O c� ca CL a) Q) o
N i •—
� ?�
r O
O =
N
Tt
Page 73 of 86
5.e) Catherine McCarroll, Intermediate Planner re: Ministry of Heritage,...
O
e
r.
0
■. ''
Ad
e Lei rt
d }
-milkt �I
=e
O
4�
cr
m
Tt
Page 74 of 86
5.e) Catherine McCarroll, Intermediate Planner re: Ministry of Heritage,...
O
•-
M
cu
4-,
At
(�
cv
i
c:
V
W `V
W � W
O U �, a
O Q > >
;�
� b _ �
c a V O
i U
_ a tea, °=' H aA
o 'er o
a� 4-0 V C a H o
z°
Tt
Tt
Page 75 of 86
5.e) Catherine McCarroll, Intermediate Planner re: Ministry of Heritage,...
p — .c
N � .M
cc
p c: O> 4
U cc — N
ca V
Q cc
a..
p ago -c a- p
c: = i
2 c: `~ }'
' cc
c: Ln c:i •� H
ca + aJ - O
c V
c: (� p
Q w p c p
NQ M ca 0 O
O 'v ci 0 p c:
'U U •c: V
cc: 4Q
Q ♦Q
._ c N
._
�' O •`r' p ca co a t
ca c/) � � O
O .v 0 CL � N
ar.
o camp
0
� -c
Ln
Tt
Page 76 of 86
5.e) Catherine McCarroll, Intermediate Planner re: Ministry of Heritage,...
a E O0 M
.— t�0
.— E Q C
Q -O co O cn
ate-+ U
• co O v
0 W O
E —
a�
^ U W Q
a-+ •- +�-+ U L U
V
Q 5
U EO 0-
ro N ca � O cn N ca �
E O E Q +� cn �
�••� • cnLn W vi Q
U Co
V O ca ca E
� Q � .O
'O
4J bA
Page 77 of 86
5.e) Catherine McCarroll, Intermediate Planner re: Ministry of Heritage,...
- 0
cu M
a.,
G
m
mmmn
,xq ca
4-0
a
a,
a
a
N E V
0 c Q j
Ca
H
O U
r x a_ a) ai ai
v
C � o °
X ' 4-j a
u0 > 0 = Wa
0 t •� O
V F- z
Tt
Page 78 of 86
5.e) Catherine McCarroll, Intermediate Planner re: Ministry of Heritage,...
O
M
low
1 1
UO
O
ELM
— ca
ca
_4-J >
U O
biA �o
O U �
pFm- }' O i
U i N a_+
> -1-j CL
O O p
4ma c `� - i � ca
i
O
N � Q i O
WV O Ln
E cn
c: N
c: O •—
Co
V c:
O
z 4-J
LLI � CO
Tt
Page 79 of 86
5.e) Catherine McCarroll, Intermediate Planner re: Ministry of Heritage,...
O
Ec
.
r.
N
0
UO •�
O
E
O
N E ac� E
aA LM tw tw
O O
O i LM 2
O a ° O
Fm
bn
V i 0 E
> i O
•
•� O O
•N L cr3 O
o 0 �
2
_ 'U = � 4A
•L i bn ateJ ate-+
z W � w 0 2 2 0- � � 2
Tt
Page 80 of 86
5.e) Catherine McCarroll, Intermediate Planner re: Ministry of Heritage,...
f ;f'
bA
0. .40�
U
'' Ov O
UO
*' 0
a-j .N
U E
d U
Q O
.� E
0 N
CL4-0
\
U a4"-+
O bA N
O
0 p 4-0 'L
�+ _I_— ca CL
U O O
4� N �, E co
> O N }' .
U
cn aA
L LI LU -0N ca — U N cn
ca
UO N ca F O Q �
E U
C�0 cn CAA +_+ N N
0 =3 Q '�
Q .— —
� �' }' a--' cOn O U
N V 2 2 cn U
I � 0
0 � o
Ln
Z Page 81 of 86
5.e) Catherine McCarroll, Intermediate Planner re: Ministry of Heritage,...
cu
CAA
ca
O
•—
o O
N c:
V O c:
•O
O r �
N � a)
a� c:
OC
� o
Page 82 of 86
5.e) Catherine McCarroll, Intermediate Planner re: Ministry of Heritage,...
O
- .
v O.
5{
W
•E V/
E D
U a_+
J Q
O E
a) o
+_+ U +j U
Y N •" k.� L-
CL N U Q Q = a)
O ca Q O X
> a) O N �: '� ca N
QJ w M � ~ too
Q = cn � � N aA Q N
O 'c Q U Q 2
L 4-0c U = .O
N � N — N N � N i
i O cr U ro a cr cr O
DC •- �
N
Ul
Page 83 of 86
5.e) Catherine McCarroll, Intermediate Planner re: Ministry of Heritage,...
0
Ec
.
r.
e
R
fy
,s.
I 1
N
cr Ln
Page 84 of 86
5.e) Catherine McCarroll, Intermediate Planner re: Ministry of Herit
■
U �
O CU
0 .—
}' CU O
1
M a) � CU
0
0 Q O
0 = U)U 0 a) U)
U)
a) 0
O
4) • • C�
4-0
— 0 —
C� to
Jc •�
0
0 U U
0 0 U)
U U) 0 u)
rM o �
� C� C� 0
O : c� a) a) —
._ o U) �
U) U)
C/)
Cu a)
0 " •to
V 0
0 CU
LL E QU
O
V
Page 85 of 86
5J) Andria Leigh, Deputy CAO/Director, Development Services re: Townshi...
Verbal Matters
�— (Section 13.3 of Township's
0�' °f Procedural By-Law No. 2017-165)
Proud Heritage,Exciting Future
Name: Andria Leigh, Deputy CAO/Director, Development Services
Item Number/Name: 5f) Township Parks & Recreation Master Plan Update
Meeting Date: Monday, October 18, 2021
Motion No.: HC211018-9
Type of Meeting: ❑ Council ❑ Special Council
❑ Development Services Committee
❑ Accessibility Advisory Committee
�X Heritage Committee
❑ Human Resources Committee
Speaking Notes:
• Received an inquiry from a Heritage Committee member about the Parks and Rec master
Plan and considering a motion from the Heritage Committee for the inclusion of Culture
and Heritage in the updated Plan
• Project purpose seems to include arts, culture, and leisure so wanted confirmation on how
heritage will be incorporated into the plan
• Spoke with Shawn Binns, Director, Operations & Community Services about the inquiry
and the role the Heritage Committee was intended to play in the process and the idea of
having the consultant attend a Heritage Committee meeting to provide an overview of the
project , how heritage aligns with the project, and how the Heritage Committee will be
engaged through the process
• Have confirmed the Township consultant and Mr. Binns will attend the next heritage
Committee meeting scheduled for November 15 at 5:00 p.m. to make a presentation to the
Committee about the project and our role as Heritage Committee members
10/20/21
Page 86 of 86