The URL can be used to link to this page

04 07 2021 Development Services Committee Agenda The Township of Oro-Medonte Development Services Committee Meeting Agenda Twnshlpof Electronic Meeting Prond Heritage, Exciting Future Wednesday, April 7, 2021 5:30 p.m. Effective Tuesday, March 17, 2020 at 8:30 a.m., all Township of Oro-Medonte facilities including the Administration Centre were closed to the public. We will continue to offer services online and over the telephone. Input on agenda items are welcome and encouraged. The Township of Oro-Medonte has amended its Procedural By-law to allow for electronic participation at Council meetings during a declared emergency. Protocols have been established to advise how to participate in the public portions of these meetings. Please visit the following links for additional information: • Request for Open Forum or DS Committee Participation Form • Protocols for Public Participation Council and DS Committee All electronic Council meetings will be streamed live, where possible, on the Township YouTube Channel. Council Agendas will continue to be published on the Civic Web Meeting Agendas in advance of the meeting date in accordance with the Township's Procedural By-law. The Township of Oro-Medonte is committed to providing and maintaining a working environment that is based on respect for the dignity and rights of everyone within the organization and for those individuals visiting our organization. The Township of Oro-Medonte supports and fosters an environment that is safe, welcoming and respectful for all residents, visitors, members of Council and staff. Page 1. Opening of Meeting: 2. Agenda Approval: a) Motion to Approve the Agenda. 3. Disclosure of Pecuniary Interest: Page 1 of 275 4. Approval of Minutes: 4 - 13 a) Minutes of Development Services Committee meeting held on Wednesday, March 3, 2021. 5. Public Meetings: 14 - 29 a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Receipt of a Complete Application; Notice of Particulars and Public Access; Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zoning By-Law of the Township of Oro-Medonte, Part of Lot 22, Concession 9 (Medonte), municipally known as 6294 Line 9 North, 2020-ZBA-07 (Watt) [Refer to Item 7c) and Items 5b) and 5c) 04 07 2021 Council Agenda]. b) **Deferred** 5:40 p.m. Notice of Receipt of a Complete Application; Notice of Particulars and Public Access; Notice of Public Meeting for Proposed Amendment to the Zoning By-Law of the Township of Oro-Medonte, Block 73, Plan 51M-1086, municipally known as 7 Henry Ball Court, 2021-ZBA-01 (555174 Ontario Ltd./Broadmoor Homes) and Consent Applications 2021-B- 12 and 2021-B-13. 6. Public Hearings: 30 - 53 a) 6:00 p.m. DS2021-46, Danielle Waters, Planner re: Minor Variance Application 2021-A-17, 2250377 Ontario Ltd., 3224 Line 4 North. 54 - 82 b) 6:10 p.m. DS2021-38, Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Planner re: Consent Application 2021-B-14 by Glenn & Olivia Thornley, 2 Paisley Court. 83 - 111 c) 6:20 p.m. DS2021-39, Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Planner re: Minor Variance Application 2021-A-13, Stephen and Lisa Hill, 2269 Lakeshore Road East. 112 - 134 d) 6:30 p.m. DS2021-40, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re: Minor Variance Application 2021-A-15, Tero Malcolm and Patricia Buell-Malcolm, 5 Pine Springs Road. 135 - 154 e) 6:40 p.m. DS2021-43, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re: Minor Variance Application 2021-A-16, Jill and Scott Strachan, 10 Greenshields Crescent. 155 - 184 f) 6:50 p.m. DS2021-45, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re: Minor Variance Application 2021-A-18, Bogdan Demkowicz, 2661 Lakeshore Road East. 185 - 215 g) 7:00 p.m. DS2021-48, Andria Leigh, Director, Development Services re: Consent Applications 2021-B-15 and 2021-B-16 by Craighurst GP Inc., 3555 and 3507 Penetanguishene Road. 7. Reports of Municipal Officers: 216 - 258 a) DS2021-35, David Yauk, GIS Technician re: Planning Division Activity Summary (Development Applications, Planning, GIS, and Heritage Committee Projects) October 2020 - March 2021 . Page 2 of 275 259 - 267 b) DS2021-44, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re: Zoning By-law Amendment Application 2020-ZBA-08, Gordon Lavery, 1585 Highway 11 North [Refer to Item 5a) 04 07 2021 Council Agenda]. 268 - 275 c) DS2021-47, Danielle Waters, Planner re: 2020-ZBA-07, Craig and Andrea Watt, Temporary Use By-law, Garden Suite (Granny Flat), 6294 Line 9 North. 8. Next Meeting Date: Wednesday, May 5, 2021. 9. Adjournment: a) Motion to Adjourn. Page 3 of 275 4.a) Minutes of Development Services Committee meeting held on Wednesday... The Township of Oro-Medonte (w Development Services Committee Minutes Township of tPi Electronic Meeting Proud Heritage,Exciting Future Wednesday, March 3, 2021 5:30 p.m. Present: Mayor H.S. Hughes Councillor Ian Veitch Councillor Tammy DeSousa Councillor Cathy Keane Councillor Shawn Scott Councillor Randy Greenlaw Regrets: Deputy Mayor Ralph Hough Staff Andria Leigh, Director, Development Services; Derek Witlib, Manager, Present: Planning Services; Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Planner; Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner; Danielle Waters, Planner; Janette Teeter, Supervisor, Clerk's Services/Deputy Clerk; Jason Scharapenko, Information Technology Technician (IT) Agar," t All Council and staff participated via Zoom platform. 1. Opening of MeetiNngAP%6,N Mayor H.S. Hughes assumed the Chair at the above-noted time and called the meeting to order. N6� 2. Agenda Approval: a) Motion to Approve the Agenda. Motion No. DSC210303-1 Moved by DeSousa, Seconded by Scott It is recommended that the agenda for the Development Services Committee meeting of Wednesday March 3, 2021 be received and approved. Carried. Page 1 of 10 Page 4 of 275 4.a) Minutes of Development Services Committee meeting held on Wednesday... Development Services Committee Meeting Minutes — Wednesday, March 3, 2021. 3. Disclosure of Pecuniary Interest: None declared. 4. Approval of Minutes: a) Minutes of Development Services Committee meeting held on Wednesday, February 3, 2021 . Motion No. DSC210303-2 Moved by Greenlaw, Seconded by Keane k4 It is recommended that the draft minutes of the Development Services Committee meeting held on Wednesday, February 3, 2021 be received and approved as printed and circulated. Carried. 5. Public Meetings: None. Page 2 of 10 Page 5 of 275 4.a) Minutes of Development Services Committee meeting held on Wednesday... Development Services Committee Meeting Minutes — Wednesday, March 3, 2021. 6. Public Hearings: a) DS2021-31, Derek Witlib, Manager, Planning Services re: Minor Variance Application 2021-A-07 by Giannoula Barlas-Toutounis, 849 Woodland Drive. The following correspondence was received: Township of Oro-Medonte, Manager, Development Engineering dated February 17, 2021; Township of Oro-Medonte, Operations Division dated February 17, 2021; Township of Oro-Medonte, Building Division dated February 18, 2021 ; Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority dated February 24, 2021; Debra and David Edwards dated February 26, 2021 . Derek Witlib, Manager, Planning Services, explained the purpose and effect of the proposed amendment. A PowerPoint presentation was presented. Keith Brown, applicant, was present. A& 'X Staff commented that no additional public registrations were received. There was no additional correspondence received during this hearing. There being no further comments or questions, the hearing adjourned. Motion No. DSC210303-3 Moved by Veitch, Seconded by DeSousa It is recommended: 1 . That DS2021-31, Derek Witlib, Manager, Planning Services re: Minor Variance Application 2021-A-07 by Giannoula Barlas-Toutounis, 849 Woodland Drive be received and adopted. 2. That Minor Variance Application 2021-A-07by Giannoula Barlas-Toutounis, specifically to permit a maximum height of 6.72 metres (22.1 feet) and a maximum floor area of 97 sq. m (1 ,044.1 sq. feet) for a proposed second-storey addition to an existing detached accessory building, for a property located at 849 Woodland Drive, be approved, subject to the conditions as outlined in DS2021-031 . 3. That the applicant be advised of the Development Services Committee's decision under the Secretary-Treasurer's signature. Carried. Page 3 of 10 Page 6 of 275 4.a) Minutes of Development Services Committee meeting held on Wednesday... Development Services Committee Meeting Minutes — Wednesday, March 3, 2021. b) DS2021-28, Danielle Waters, Planner re: Minor Variance Application 2021-A-08, Karen, Sandra, Brian & Greg Vadasz, 211 Eight Mile Point Road. The following correspondence was received: Township of Oro-Medonte, Manager, Development Engineering dated February 17, 2021 ; Township of Oro-Medonte, Operations Division dated February 17, 2021; Township of Oro-Medonte, Building Division dated February 18, 2021 ; Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority dated February 23, 2021 . Danielle Waters, Planner, explained the purpose and effect of the proposed amendment. A PowerPoint presentation was presented Michael Scott, on behalf of the applicant, was present. Staff commented that no additional public registrations were received. There was no additional correspondence received during this hearing. There being no further comments or questions, the hearing adjourned. Motion No. DSC210303-4 'N Moved by Keane, Seconded by Greenlaw It is recommended 1. That DS2021-28, Danielle Waters, Planner re: Minor Variance Application 2021-A- 008, Karen, Sandra, Brian & Greg Vadasz, 211 Eight Mile Point Road be received and adopted. 2. That Minor Variance Application 2021-A-08 by Karen, Sandra, Brian & Greg Vadasz, specifically for permission to increase the footprint of a boathouse and attached deck to 120.0 square metres (1 ,292 square feet) on the lands municipally known as 211 Eight Mile Point Road, Township of Oro-Medonte, be approved, subject to the conditions as outlined in DS2021-28. 3. That the applicant be advised of the Development Services Committee's decision under the Secretary-Treasurer's signature. Carried. Page 4 of 10 Page 7 of 275 4.a) Minutes of Development Services Committee meeting held on Wednesday... Development Services Committee Meeting Minutes — Wednesday, March 3, 2021. c) DS2021-27, Danielle Waters, Planner re: Minor Variance Application 2021-A-10, Lydia Ruzycky, 141 Eight Mile Point Road. The following correspondence was received: Township of Oro-Medonte, Manager, Development Engineering dated February 17, 2021; Township of Oro-Medonte, Operations Division dated February 17, 2021; Township of Oro-Medonte, Building Division dated February 18, 2021; Patricia McCulloch dated March 17 2021; February 26, 2021, February 25, 2021 and September 3, 2019; Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority dated February 24, 2021; John Hunter dated February 27, 2021. Danielle Waters, Planner, explained the purpose and effect of the proposed amendment. A PowerPoint presentation was presented. Michelle Dada, on behalf of the applicant, was present. The following provided public comments. Patricia McCulloch referred to her submission and provided opposition comments regarding the application's distance from the lake, the height of the dwelling, the difference in height with her adjacent dwelling, she stated the application is too high, too long and too close to the lake. There was no additional correspondence received during this hearing. There being no further comments or questions, the hearing adjourned. Motion No. DSC210303-5 Moved by Scott, Seconded by Veitch It is recommended 1. That DS2021-27, Danielle Waters, Planner re: Minor Variance Application 2021-A-10, Lydia Ruzycky, 141 Eight Mile Point Road be received and adopted. 2. That Minor Variance Application 2021-A-10 by Lydia Ruzycky, specifically to permit a reduced setback from average high water mark of Lake Simcoe of 13.5m (44.3 ft.) to a proposed stair case serving an existing boathouse, on the lands municipally known as 141 Eight Mile Point Road, Township of Oro-Medonte, be denied for the reasons outlined in DS2021-27. 3. That Minor Variance Application 2021-A-10 by Lydia Ruzycky, specifically to permit a single detached dwelling with a maximum height of 11.2m (36.7 ft.), a reduced setback from average high water mark of Lake Simcoe of 17.Om (55.8 ft.) to proposed deck attached to a dwelling, and a reduced setback from average high water mark of Lake Simcoe of 15.0 metres (49.2 feet) to a proposed stair case serving an existing boathouse, on the lands municipally known as 141 Eight Mile Point Road, Township of Oro-Medonte, be approved, subject to the conditions as outlined in DS2021-27. 4. That the applicant be advised of the Development Services Committee's decision under the Secretary-Treasurer's signature. Carried. Page 5 of 10 Page 8 of 275 4.a) Minutes of Development Services Committee meeting held on Wednesday... Development Services Committee Meeting Minutes — Wednesday, March 3, 2021. d) DS2021-29, Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Planner re: Minor Variance Application 2021- A-09, Sherry and Rob Davidson, 94 Line 14 South. The following correspondence was received: Township of Oro-Medonte, Manager, Development Engineering dated February 19, 2021; Township of Oro-Medonte, Operations Division dated February 19, 2021; Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority dated February 25, 2021 ; Bobbi Leppington, Design by Bobbi, on behalf of the applicant dated March 3, 2021 . Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Planner, explained the purpose and effect of the proposed amendment. A PowerPoint presentation was presented.' Sherry Davidson, applicant, was present. Staff commented that no additional public registrations were received. There was no additional correspondence received during this hearing. There being no further comments or questions, the hearing adjourned. Motion No. DSC210303-6 Moved by Keane, Seconded by Scott"" It is recommended 1 . That DS2021-29, Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Planner re: Minor Variance Application 2021-A-09, Sherry and Rob Davidson, 94 Line 14 South be received. 2. That Minor Variance Application 2021-A-09 by Sherry and Rob Davidson, specifically for permission to construct a pool cabana with a maximum floor area of 111 .5 square metres (1 ,200.2 square feet) and an in-ground pool in the Environmental Protection Zone, on lands municipally known as 94 Line 14 South, be deferred at the request of the applicant. 3. That the applicant be advised of the Development Services Committee's decision under the Secretary-Treasurer's signature. I%f Carried. Page 6 of 10 Page 9 of 275 4.a) Minutes of Development Services Committee meeting held on Wednesday... Development Services Committee Meeting Minutes — Wednesday, March 3, 2021. e) DS2021-8, Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Planner re: Consent Applications 2020-B-25, 2020-B-26 and 2020-B-27 by Binglin He and Yuqiong He, 4352 Line 11 North. The following correspondence was received: Bell Canada Right of Way dated January 18, 2021; Township of Oro-Medonte, Building Division dated January 18 and February 17, 2021. Township of Oro-Medonte, Manager, Development Engineering dated January 18, 2021 and February 17, 2021 ; Blair Goss dated January 22, 2021 ; Township of Oro-Medonte, Operations Division dated January 26, 2021 and February 17, 2021 ; Aubrey Ford dated February 7, 2021 ; John Dirneder dated February 24, 2021. Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Planner, explained the purpose and effect of the proposed amendment. A PowerPoint presentation was presented. Shenshu Zhang, on behalf of the applicant, was present. Staff commented that no additional public registrations were received. There was no additional correspondence received during this hearing. There being no further comments or questions, the hearing adjourned. Motion No. DSC210303-7 Moved by Veitch, Seconded by Greenlaw It is recommended 1. That DS2021-8, Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Planner re: Consent Applications 2020-13- 25, 2020-B-26 and 2020-B-27 by Binglin He and Yuqiong He, 4352 Line 11 North be received and adopted. 2. That the Development Services Committee deny Consent Applications 2020-B-25, 2020-B-26 and 2020-B-27 to create two (2) new agricultural lots on the basis that they do not conform to the Provincial Policy Statement, the County of Simcoe's Official Plan and the Township of Oro-Medonte's Official Plan. 3. That the applicants be advised of the Development Services Committee's decision under the Secretary-Treasurer's signature. Carried. Page 7 of 10 Page 10 of 275 4.a) Minutes of Development Services Committee meeting held on Wednesday... Development Services Committee Meeting Minutes — Wednesday, March 3, 2021. f) DS2021-24, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re: Consent Applications 2021-B- 09, 2021-B-10 and 2021-B-11 by Blue Sky Elevations Inc., 1163 Line 15 North, 1167 Line 15 North and 1173 Line 15 North. The following correspondence was received: Township of Oro-Medonte, Building Division dated February 18 and 23, 2021; Township of Oro-Medonte, Operations Division dated February 19, 2021; Township of Oro-Medonte, Manager, Development Engineering dated February 23, 2021; Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority dated March 2, 2021. Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner, explained the purpose and effect of the proposed amendment. A PowerPoint presentation was presented. Ross McLeod, applicant, was present. Aff Staff commented that no additional public registrations were received. There was no additional correspondence received during this hearing. There being no further comments or questions, the hearing adjourned`.' Motion No. DSC210303-8 Moved by DeSousa, Seconded by Veitch Vk It is recommended 1. That DS2021-24, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re. Consent Applications 2021-B-09, 2021-B-10 and 2021-B-11 by Blue Sky Elevations I nc.,1163 Line 15 North, 1167 Line 15 North and 1173 Line 15 North be received. 2. That Consent Application 2021-B-09 by Blue Sky Elevations Inc., to permit a boundary adjustment having a lot frontage of 0 metres (0 feet), a lot depth of approximately 17.08 metres (56.04 feet) and an area of approximately 0.04 hectares (0.11 acres) to be added to the property located at 1151 Line 15 North be approved, subject to the conditions as outlined in DS2021-24, as amended to remove "payment of cash in lieu of parkland" from Condition a). 3. That Consent Application 2021-B-10 by Blue Sky Elevations Inc., to permit a boundary adjustment having a lot frontage of approximately 0 metres (0 feet), a lot depth of approximately 34.0 metres (111.5 feet) and an area of approximately 0.08 hectares (0.21 acres) to be added to the property located at 1151 Line 15 North be approved, subject to the conditions as outlined in DS2021-24 as amended to remove "payment of cash in lieu of parkland" from Condition a). 4. That Consent Application 2021-B-11 by Blue Sky Elevations Inc., to permit a boundary adjustment having a lot frontage of approximately 0 metres (0 feet), a lot depth of approximately 57.0 metres (187.0 feet) and an area of approximately 0.15 hectares (0.38 acres) to be added to the property located at 1151 Line 15 North be approved, subject to the conditions as outlined in DS2021-24 as amended to remove "payment of cash in lieu of parkland" from Condition a). 5. That the applicant be advised of the Development Services Committee's decision under the Secretary-Treasurer's signature. Carried. Page 8 of 10 Page 11 of 275 4.a) Minutes of Development Services Committee meeting held on Wednesday... Development Services Committee Meeting Minutes — Wednesday, March 3, 2021. 7. Reports of Municipal Officers: a) DS2021-23, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re: Zoning By-law Amendment Application 2019-ZBA-11 by John, Linda and George Hill, 517 50/51 Sideroad [Refer to Item 5b) 03 03 2021 Council Agenda]. Motion No. DSC210303-9 Moved by Scott, Seconded by DeSousa It is recommended A& 1 . That DS2021-23, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re: Zoning By-law Amendment Application 2019-ZBA-11 by John, Linda and George Hill, 517 50/51 Sideroad be received and adopted. 2. That Zoning By-law Amendment Application 2019-ZBA-11 by John, Linda and George Hill, specifically to rezone the subject lands from the Agricultural/Rural (A/RU) Zone to the Agricultural/Rural Exception 328 (A/RU*328) Zone to permit an accessory apartment dwelling unit in a detached accessory building, on the lands municipally known as 517 50/51 Sideroad, be approved. 3. That the appropriate draft by-law be brought forward for Council's consideration. 4. That the applicant be advised of the Committee's decision under the Director, Development Services' signature. Carried. Aa%h, b) DS2021-30, Andria Leigh, Director, Development Services re: LPAT Hearing Representation, Minor Variance Application 2019-A-42 (Robu), 259 Moon Point Drive. Motion No. DSC210303-10 % %L, 4�%, Moved by Greenlaw, Seconded by Keane It is recommended 1. That DS2021-30, Andria Leigh, Director, Development Services re: LPAT Hearing Representation, Minor Variance Application 2019-A-42 (Robu), 259 Moon Point Drive be received and adopted. 2. That staff proceed with Option 1 as outlined in DS2021-30 in preparation for the LPAT hearing scheduled for May 19, 2021. Carried. 8. Next Meeting Date: Wednesday, April 7, 2021. Page 9 of 10 Page 12 of 275 4.a) Minutes of Development Services Committee meeting held on Wednesday... Development Services Committee Meeting Minutes — Wednesday, March 3, 2021. 9. Adjournment: a) Motion to Adjourn. Motion No. DSC210303-11 Moved by Scott, Seconded by Veitch It is recommended that we do now adjourn at 7.07 p.m. Carried. An audio recording of the meeting is available through the Township's website. 'Affilh, f%k, Mayor H.S Hughes, Chair Derek Witlib, Manager, Planning Services Page 10 of 10 Page 13 of 275 5.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Receipt of a Complete Application; Notice of Pa... Notice of Receipt of a Complete Application Notice of Particulars and Public Access Notice of Public Meeting for ttr<r //c�� r,►�zlc� Proposed Amendment to the Zoning By-law of the Township of Oro-Medonte 2020-ZBA-07 (Watt) Due to the evolving public heath situation (COVID-19), effective March 17,2020 at 8:30 am the Township of Oro-Medonte Administration Office is closed to the general public until further notice. The Township will livestream the Public Meeting over the internet for public viewing and participation. Please refer to the Township's website (oro-medonte.ca)for Public Meeting viewing and participation information. Take notice that the Township of Oro-Medonte deemed the following application to amend Zoning By-law 97-95, as amended, a"Complete"Application pursuant to the Planning Acton the 6th day of January, 2021. Take notice that the Development Services Committee of the Township of Oro- Medonte will hold a livestreamed Public Meeting on April 7, 2027 at 5:30 p.m. The purpose of the Public Meeting is to notify the public and to obtain public comments on a proposed Amendment to Comprehensive Zoning By-law 97-95, under Section 34 of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990 c. P. 13. The subject lands are described as Part of Lot 22, Concession 9 (Medonte), municipally known as 6294 Line 9 North.A key map illustrating the location of the subject lands, and a copy of the applicants site plan including the lands to be rezoned are included with this notice. The purpose and effect of the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment is to permit the continued use of an existing garden suite (temporary 2nd dwelling unit)for a temporary period of 3 years. Input on the draft by-law amendment is welcome and encouraged. For specific details regarding public participation during the meeting please check the Township website at https://www.oro-medonte.ca/mun icipal-services/plan ninq-information. Written submissions can be made by: 1. Emailed to plan ninW( oro-medonte.ca prior to or during the Public Hearing; 2. Dropped in the drop box at the Township Administration Office on Line 7 South; 3. Faxed to (705)487-0133;or, 4. Mailed through Canada Post. If a person or public body does not make oral submissions at the public meeting or make written submissions to the Director, Development Services,The Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte before the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment is passed or refused,the person or public body is not entitled to appeal the decision of the Council of the Township of Oro-Medonte to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal and may not be added as a party to the hearing of an appeal before the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal unless, in the opinion of the Tribunal,there are reasonable grounds to do so. Further details of the application are part of the public record and are available to the public for viewing/inspection on the Township's website www.oro-medonte.ca.Any person wishing further information or clarification with regard to the application should contact the Planning Division at 705-487-2171 or plan ninq(a oro-medonte.ca. Individuals who submit letters and other information to Council and its advisory bodies should be aware that all information, including contact information, contained within their communications may become part of the public record and may be made F:\Development Services\Planning\D-Development&Planning\D14 Zoning\2020 Applications\2020-ZBA-07(Watt)D14 58073\Notice&Decision\2021 03 12 Notice of Complete App&PM.docx Page 14 of 275 5.a) 5:30 p.m. Notice of Receipt of a Complete Application; Notice of Pa... available through the agenda process which includes publication on the Township's website. If you wish to be notified of the decision of the Township of Oro-Medonte in respect to the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment, you must make a written request. Written submissions/requests should be directed to: Township of Oro-Medonte 148 Line 7 South Oro-Medonte, Ontario LOL 2E0 Attn:Andria Leigh, Director, Development Services plan ninq(o)oro-medonte.ca Dated at the Township of Oro-Medonte this 15th day of March, 2021. Location Map �z � ---Va'�Y-Rd, G R I O O 3 L Beef z Os d z c 'c J ® Subject Lands Peter St:E. Page 15 of 275 5.a) 5:3 p.m. Notice of Receipt of a Complete Application; Notice of Pa. Applicant's Site Plan/Zoning Sketch A :k z: %t � PM Am ww nwF % K bo Eli § ! $ k ch k§ 1d; C .4ElOD $ > . #� k .! m / � . % / § W :M> k z Dr 4C2 Q2ii�2 20I23SS}ONS g AKO !O %) KNOWN AS gth LINE / Page 16 of 275 5.a) 5.30 p.m. Notice of Receipt of a Complete Application; Notice of Pa... From: Saunders, David<dsaunders@oro-medonte.ca> Sent:Tuesday, March 16, 2021 11:30 AM To: Falconi,Teresa <tfalconi@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Re: Notice of Complete Application & Public Meeting- Development Services Committee meeting, April 7, 2021 (2020-ZBA-07) Watt Teresa Development Engineering has No Objection or Further Comment with the regard to the above noted Application. Stay Healthy Dave Page 17 of 275 5.a) 5.30 p.m. Notice of Receipt of a Complete Application; Notice of Pa... From: Metras,Justin <jmetras@oro-medonte.ca> Sent:Tuesday, March 16, 2021 6:34 AM To: Falconi,Teresa <tfalconi@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Re: Notice of Complete Application & Public Meeting- Development Services Committee meeting, April 7, 2021 (2020-ZBA-07) Watt Teresa Operations has no comments on this application. Regards Justin Page 18 of 275 5.a) 5.30 p.m. Notice of Receipt of a Complete Application; Notice of Pa... From: McCartney, Garry<gmccartney@oro-medonte.ca> Sent:Wednesday, March 17, 2021 10:10 PM To: Falconi,Teresa <tfalconi@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Re: Notice of Complete Application & Public Meeting- Development Services Committee meeting, April 7, 2021 (2020-ZBA-07) Watt Building Division has no comments at this time. Thank you, Garry McCartney, CBO Page 19 of 275 5.a) 5.30 p.m. Notice of Receipt of a Complete Application; Notice of Pa... a oo en acester-Rd:� d P- 4 - - - CO v 111 w t i O Cu CL �\ �I CU w Y E O' H I A\ G7 W a ^� O W Q E CO Q N CD � N � CU ry O >, CN Q m 0 — — Z CD c� .� ca Cu 70 0 J a) N N U . . . . 0) tQ tq � a N O U Page 20 of 275 5.a) 5.30 p.m. Notice of Receipt of a Complete Application; Notice of Pa... o 3 °+ W A O_ '�^ }+ v J cu U a) .— 0 C ^ 0) Q 0) CU 5 U) N �x O ca a) Q M Q z3 a) N z3 a) o .C: o > N 0-0� o m ° 0) a) 0- CU E t+0- O � � N 0) a� a) L � a N Page 21 of 275 5.a) 5.30 p.m. Notice of Receipt of a Complete Application; Notice of Pa... l�51av1n r o x .c c - a O cu U 0 Q � ♦--� CU E 0 O N Q E m Q N � O Cu N O m 0) O N 0 0 a L Q Page 22 of 275 5.a) 5.30 p.m. Notice of Receipt of a Complete Application; Notice of Pa... nRg �xrz u16 sv nAoroi ..n �ra.,ru �d 0� l'11VV o Sirf'iiSSa:��vv.� ivucuuWLr Y °r w (ld),weg 00,CC'00L (IfRld 04,CC.4CN �� e- oaf a T L0 h3 � I NO I 14 d k h �� ^ ,as*% cu 7 �1 a a VN •� p ,CC'C9 0L P,0'ri Q ^ oo � R $ n }� CU o z �d G /do, nw 7M11 aw �a a JS 6d),00'60L (n),06'Y02 (13RIdOI,GC.4CN p,`. O W �m E W Q N � O Cu N O N m 0) . . O FL N Cn 0 ca CL CL a Page 23 of 275 5.a) 5.30 p.m. Notice of Receipt of a Complete Application; Notice of Pa... R w y� W' W w l^ IP i [n O r CL' r U CIO I , � o Q N h o O o � N ' 06 � i I 0 Lj N i o L J ■ Q Page 24 of 275 5.a) 5.30 p.m. Notice of Receipt of a Complete Application; Notice of Pa... N �G , i � d 4I r Cu d QL \^� CU i i i O i Q N � o CD M f1.W � 7 7 ek 'xr• ' -� SJI -R ;gyp r � i 3 t +� , Page 25 of 275 5.a) 5.30 p.m. Notice of Receipt of a Complete Application; Notice of Pa... , w � } 3` m O e Cu Fw- ?,- x CL }+ (V a--� O W 0 E L Q N 0) CD `U 04 t O 77 e � F Y,-la Y 4 h. 1 f }A Page 26 of 275 5.a) 5.30 p.m. Notice of Receipt of a Complete Application; Notice of Pa... Cu "r ?c k � z j -j% ♦--+ CU O Vl 0) CD ca CDI ; w s }�� NNW k � Page 27 of 275 5.a) 5.30 p.m. Notice of Receipt of a Complete Application; Notice of Pa... t. 0) C ■� O Cu X V W it CU 0) Q N r: CU CD t� � I Page 28 of 275 5.a) 5.30 p.m. Notice of Receigt of a Complete Application; Notice of Pa... a) E 0 w o L W R 70 CO N f C y CO (U U O C CO >, X LO0 CO (n m 7 m O q - � O 4-0 O a) E U N _0 >+ 0) Q O .O O m a) N L >+ a) a) - > M L O Kl CO O W L 4-0 L O }� a) � O }� O E U O L >,Z H 0 .0 Cu 0-) CO L O a) m Q N L J -0 � CO � CO J O O -0 N O 4 m (� I O �✓ Q CD U mO C Q N Q (Dwc O N Y N _0 o (n ON Cu N Q (B C) E N E cu O O 0- L O 70 t CO 0 V NCO 0 M O U 4- W U Q O L L N Q+ O Q- O M L Q (Q Z N 70 M � Cn � O a) Q E O L > m O .l^ O -0 -0 0)J O O CD (Q �G N O �- C14L CO � � ++ p CO U (0 o >1 o Q z CDo Q00 (U 70 m 4- a� O O >, Y O 70 Q 0- �. c () O U N � (6 a) � NE CO (n ECO CO M _0 O 0 Q C� a, c\i ri Page 29 of 275 6.a) 6.00 p.m. DS2021-46, Danielle Waters, Planner re: Minor Variance Ap... Township of Report Proud Heritage, Exciting Future Report No. To: Prepared By: DS2021-046 Development Services Danielle Waters, Committee Planner Meeting Date: Subject: Motion # April 7, 2021 Minor Variance Application 2021-A-17 Roll #: 2250377 Ontario Ltd. R.M.S. File #: 4346-010-002-15894 3224 Line 4 North D13-59205 Recommendation(s): Requires Action For Information Only It is recommended: 1. That Report No. DS2021-046 be received and adopted. 2. That Minor Variance Application 2021-A-17 by 2250377 Ontario Ltd., specifically for permission to permit a detached accessory building with an increase in height to 5.94 metres (19.49 feet), increase in floor area to 156.0 square metres (1,680.0 square feet) and increase in lot coverage to 7.3% on the lands municipally known as 3224 Line 4 North, Township of Oro-Medonte, be approved, subject to the conditions as outlined in Report DS2021-046. 3. The conditions are as follows: a. That notwithstanding Section 5.1.4 Maximum Height, Section 5.1 .5 - Maximum lot coverage, and Section 5.1.6 — Maximum floor area of Zoning By-law 97-95, the proposed detached accessory building shall otherwise comply with all other applicable provisions of the Zoning By-law; b. That the proposed structure is not to be used for human habitation; c. That the proposed structure be substantially and proportionally in conformity with the dimensions as set out on the application and sketches submitted and approved by the Committee; d. That the existing detached 1-car garage be removed and replaced with the proposed structure; e. That the appropriate Zoning Certificate and Building Permit be obtained from the Township only after the Committee's decision becomes final and binding, as provided for within the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P. 13. 4. And that the applicant be advised of the Development Services Committee's decision under the Secretary-Treasurer's signature. Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-046 Page 1 of 11 Page 30 of 275 6.a) 6.00 p.m. DS2021-46, Danielle Waters, Planner re: Minor Variance Ap... Background: The subject property has a lot area of 0.63 hectares (1.55 acres) and is currently used as a residential lot, as shown on Schedules 1 and 2. The property currently supports a single detached dwelling and several detached accessory buildings. The subject lands have been used in conjunction with a surrounding adjacent property, which supports a barn, a silo and an agricultural building, for agricultural purposes. The applicant is proposing to construct a new detached accessory building, being a 2-car garage intended to replace an existing 1-car garage. The applicant is requesting relief from the following sections of Zoning By-law 97-95, as amended: Section 5.1.4 — Maximum height Required. Proposed: 4.5 metres (14.7 feet) T5.94 metres (19.49 feet) Section 5.1.5 — Maximum lot coverage Required: Proposed: maximum lot coverage of all detached 82.6 m. sq., existing 3 car garage accessory buildings and structures on a lot 225.2 m. sq. existing implement shed is 5 percent 156.0 m. sq. proposed 3 car garage with storage above 7.3 % lot coverage Section 5.1 .6 — Maximum floor area A/RU 7zoneRequired. oposed:100.0 s uare metres 1076.4 s uare feet6.0 square metres 1 ,680.0 square feet The applicant's site plan and elevation drawings are included as Schedules 3 and 4 to this report. Analysis: Provincial Policies Provincial Policy Statement, 2020 The Provincial Policy Statement 2020 (PPS) came into effect on May 1, 2020 to replace the 2014 PPS. The Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) provides policy direction on matters of Provincial interest related to land use planning and development. Specifically, Section 1.1.3 — Settlement Areas is applicable to this application and provides that settlement areas are to be the focus for growth and development and to plan for a range of land uses, including residential use such as the lands subject to this application. The subject lands are located within the Horseshoe Valley settlement area and the proposed building is considered accessory to the residential use of the property that should be Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-046 Page 2 of 11 Page 31 of 275 6.a) 6.00 p.m. DS2021-46, Danielle Waters, Planner re: Minor Variance Ap... directed to settlement areas, therefore Planning Staff is of the opinion that this application is consistent with the Settlement Areas policies of the PPS. A Place to Grow, Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe 2020 A Place to Grow (2020) provides a long-term plan to manage growth and protect the natural environment. Section 2.2.1 Managing Growth is applicable to this application and states that settlement areas should be the focus of growth. This section has been reviewed and Planning Staff are of the opinion that the proposed detached accessory building (garage) conforms to the policies in the Growth Plan 2020 as the lands subject to this application are already within an established residential settlement area. County of Simcoe Official Plan The property is designated Settlements in the County of Simcoe's Official Plan. The intent of the Settlements designation is to "focus population and employment growth and development within settlements, and minimize land consumption and servicing costs" (County of Simcoe, 2016). In Planning Staff's opinion, the applicant's minor variance application for a detached building accessory to the residential use conforms to the general intent and purpose of the County's Official Plan by focusing development within the settlement area of Horseshoe Valley. Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13 Section 3(5) of the Planning Act states that all decisions in respect of the exercise of any authority that affects a planning matter shall be consistent with Provincial Policy Statements and shall conform with or shall not conflict with the Provincial Plans that are in effect on the date of the decision. Section 45(1) of the Planning Act establishes a four-fold test for a minor variance which requires consideration of: (1) whether the variance is minor; (2) whether the variance is desirable for the appropriate development or use of the land, building or structure; (3) whether the general purpose and intent of the zoning by-law is maintained; and (4) whether the general purpose and intent of the Official Plan is maintained. A variance must meet all four of these tests. Planning Staff has reviewed this application against these four tests as follows: Do the variances conform to the general intent of the Official Plan? The subject lands are within the Rural Settlement Area of Horseshoe Valley and are designated Resort Facility according to Schedule D — Horseshoe Valley Land Use, which forms part of the Township's Official Plan. Pursuant to the policies of the Plan, residential Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-046 Page 3 of 11 Page 32 of 275 6.a) 6.00 p.m. DS2021-46, Danielle Waters, Planner re: Minor Variance Ap... and agricultural uses are not permitted in this designation; however, these are existing uses of the lands which predate the Resort Facility designation and therefore may continue as such. The subject lands and the existing structures appear to benefit from ongoing investment by the owner as evidenced by their well-maintained state, which would indicate that, notwithstanding the Resort Facility designation, the existing residential use can be anticipated to continue into the foreseeable future. The requested variances, if approved, would further strengthen the permanence of the existing residential use of the lands and reduce the likelihood of the lands being redeveloped in accordance with the Resort Facility designation. However, the Township appears to have an adequate supply of lands designate to meet current and future resort- related needs. Therefore, it is Planning Staff's opinion that the requested variances, if approved, will not materially detract for the goals and objectives of the Official Plan and that the general purpose and intent of the Official Plan will be met. Do the variances conform to the general intent of the Zoning By-law? The subject property is zoned Agricultural/Rural (A/RU) in the Township's Zoning By- law 97-95, as amended. Single detached dwellings are permitted in the A/RU Zone and the proposed detached accessory building would be accessory to this permitted use. The general intent of the Zoning By-law in requiring the maximum height, floor area and lot coverage requirements is to ensure that an accessory building will continue to be secondary and subordinate to the primary use of the property as residential. The proposed detached accessory building will be smaller in size (floor area) than the existing dwelling. The proposed accessory building will be located 14m from the road; however, it will be in the front yard. For properties that are in the A/RU zone, the Zoning By-law permits a detached accessory building in the front yard, provided that the building complies with a minimum 8.0 metre setback from the front lot line. In this case, the accessory building is proposed to be located more than 14 metres from the front lot line. Upon site inspection, it was confirmed that there is mature vegetation located along the lot lines that would partially screen the building from the street. It is also noted that there are agricultural buildings on the neighbouring properties that are larger that the proposed building, and therefore would allow it to blend with the community. It is Planning Staff's opinion that based on the combination of the proposed accessory building remaining smaller than the dwelling, a large proposed setback from the street and the mature vegetation existing on the property that the proposed accessory building would therefore continue to appear to be secondary and subordinate to the residential use of the property. For the reasons outlined above, Planning Staff is of the opinion that the requested variances are considered to meet the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law. Are the variances appropriate for the desirable development of the lot? Planning Staff does not expect the proposed structure to stand-out, look out of place or Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-046 Page 4 of 11 Page 33 of 275 6.a) 6.00 p.m. DS2021-46, Danielle Waters, Planner re: Minor Variance Ap... detract from the character of this established neighbourhood. Upon site visit, Staff noted that the proposed building would be partially visible from the neighbouring properties and from Line 4 North, but that the existing mature vegetation along the lot lines and setback of 14 metres would effectively buffer the presence of the building. There are several existing accessory buildings currently on the property, one of which is to be removed. Despite the requested variance for lot coverage, the subject lands would still maintain adequate outdoor amenity space and the proposed building would not conflict with functional matters such as parking or the septic system. Line 4 North represents the easterly boundary of the Horseshoe Valley Rural Settlement Area and possesses a distinctly rural character, which is expected to continue into the foreseeable future, as no urban development is permitted along the east side of the road. The proposed structure will be in keeping with the rural character of the neighbourhood as several surrounding properties have detached buildings, with one of these being a two- storey structure. In Planning Staff's opinion the proposed variances, if approved, will not set a negative precedent for future development within the Settlement Area, as the form and density of such future development is not anticipated to be supportive of large accessory buildings. Section 5.1.1 of the Zoning By-law speaks to no detached accessory building shall be used for human habitation, therefore condition 3. b) of this minor variance will restrict the building to storage use only. The proposed structure will not interfere with functional matters such as parking and the septic system. Based on the above, Planning Staff are satisfied that the proposed development would be considered desirable for the appropriate development of the lot. Are the variances minor? The question of the minor nature of the variance relates to its scale and impact. The structure is not anticipated to have an adverse impact on the neighbourhood as the new structure will appear the same from the road as the existing to be demolished, is set back into the property and some mature vegetation will soften the appearance of the building from neighbouring properties and Line 4 North. The proposed accessory building is set well back from the road, and is smaller in floor area than the existing two storey dwelling. In Planning Staff's opinion, the requested Minor Variance is minor in nature. As the proposed variances are considered to conform to the general intent of the Official Plan, to meet the general intent of the Zoning By-law, to be appropriate for the desirable development of the lot, and is not anticipated to have an adverse effect on the character of the surrounding area, the variance is considered to be minor. Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-046 Page 5 of 11 Page 34 of 275 6.a) 6.00 p.m. DS2021-46, Danielle Waters, Planner re: Minor Variance Ap... Financial / Legal Implications / Risk Management: Potential financial and legal implications should the decision of the Committee be appealed to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal and Council chooses to defend the Committee's decision. Policies/Legislation: • Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.P.13 • Provincial Policy Statement, 2020 • A Place to Grow, 2020 • County of Simcoe Official Plan • Township of Oro-Medonte Official Plan • Township of Oro-Medonte Zoning By-law No. 97-95, as amended Corporate Strategic Goals: In 2016, Council adopted the Township's Strategic Plan. The following Goals of the Plan are relevant to this application: Balanced Growth - Ensure land use planning policies manage change and promote economic activity that does not negatively impact the Township's natural heritage features and attributes. Staff are of the opinion that the proposed development will not negatively impact the Township's natural features and attributes and is therefore consistent with the Strategic Plan. Consultations: Notice of this application was circulated to the public and to various review agencies and Township departments. A Public notice sign was also posted on the subject lands. As of the preparation of this report, the following comments have been received: • Township Infrastructure and Capital Projects — no objections Attachments: Schedule 1 : Location Map Schedule 2: Aerial Photo Schedule 3: Applicant's Site Plan Schedule 4: Applicant's Elevation Plan Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-046 Page 6 of 11 Page 35 of 275 6.a) 6.00 p.m. DS2021-46, Danielle Waters, Planner re: Minor Variance Ap... Conclusion: Planning Staff recommends that Minor Variance Application 2021-A-17 be approved, specifically to permit a detached accessory building with an increase in height to 5.94 metres (19.49 feet), increase in floor area to 156.0 square metres (1,680.0 square feet) and increase in lot coverage to 7.3% on the lands municipally known as 3224 Line 4 North on the basis that the application is consistent with and conforms to Provincial policies and plans and the County and Township Official Plans and meets the four tests of the Planning Act. Respectfully submitted: Danielle Waters, Planner Approvals: Date Derek Witlib, Manager, Planning Services April 1, 2021 Andria Leigh, Director, Development Services April 1, 2021 Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-046 Page 7 of 11 Page 36 of 275 6.a) 6.00 p.m. DS2021-46, Danielle Waters, Planner re- Minor Variance Ap... Schedule 1: Location map a 53 13 FE::aa. S1 15 ' 9 50 17 Ho�:n'oewaner•R. 48 18 oie.�rrnie.�e. 19 46 20 21 Zia e a 44 22 23 41 Fa�rn'a 25 45 Y Ct 39 37 35 33 31 27 47 pass 29 3303 49 51 736 35 34 33 32 39 Z 3224 30 29 c J 28 27 26 25 24 23 21 22 20 19 t 3094 18 17 IL d 15 3099 16 2 9 14 13 7 0065 5 12 11 10 9 4 3 C 7 �! g al 1 Qp 6 5 1 3089 3077 18 16 3 8 6 4 Schedule 1 Location QT� w�hIp O ® Subject Lands Proud Heritage,Exciting Future 0 150 M File Number.2021-A-17 Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-046 Page 8 of 11 Page 37 of 275 6.a) 6.00 p.m. DS2021-46, Danielle Waters, Planner re- Minor Variance Ap... Schedule 2: Aerial Photo F rsd. l i:mel�na. I' F R9r `Ih.IwaiielyR oie.��rae•�e. �Ritl e F Z C J i f 9 Schedule 2 Aerial Photo QTownship�O IM Subject Lands Proud Heritage,Exciting Furore 0 30 M File Number.2021-A-17 N I Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-046 Page 9 of 11 Page 38 of 275 6.a) 6.00 p.m. DS2021-46, Danielle Waters, Planner re- Minor Variance Ap... Schedule 3: Applicant Site Plan w 0 860 i, M&P, 3 CAI fiSla�{ TA rs Jgq �uqf tAr. i KiYELOW _..T T-- -- -�- - 14m j rE N FAIN UAW Schedule 3 k, Applicant's Site Plan `rI�(' Tuxnuhip of File Number 2021-A-17 Proud Heritage,Fxcifing Future Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-046 Page 10 of 11 Page 39 of 275 6.a) 6.00 p.m. DS2021-46, Danielle Waters, Planner re- Minor Variance Ap... Schedule 4: Applicant Elevation Plan Schedule 4 Applicant's Elevation Drawings 0�'(77.Vi'151ii�7 4f ; 111ea�/ tom File Number 2021-A-17 Proud F7critgQe,RxcifinQ Futr.rre Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-046 Page 11 of 11 Page 40 of 275 6.a) 6.00 p.m. DS2021-46, Danielle Waters, Planner re: Minor Variance Ap... From: Metras,Justin <jmetras@oro-medonte.ca> Sent: Friday, March 19, 2021 11:31 AM To: Falconi,Teresa <tfalconi@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Re: Notice of Public Hearing - Development Services Committee Meeting, April 07, 2021 (2021- A-17) 2250377 Ontario Ltd. Teresa Operations has no objections to this application. Justin Page 41 of 275 6.a) 6.00 p.m. DS2021-46, Danielle Waters, Planner re: Minor Variance Ap... 4101 o 3 °+ E: n -N 7 au!-T N M a Bri ,e:Pa.�,m m O PU O ��iN CU (10 L C) CL 0 Q � CM C) Lr)C) � N � .L- N Cu4-0 4-0 � — 0 ILLC O L.- _0 Cu 0 .U) J a) a) C M N C a O }' � Page 42 of 275 6.a) 6.00 p.m. DS2021-46, Danielle Waters, Planner re: Minor Variance Ap... 4101 CO >, O, � 3 a O U U) O v IN � T Ca O U) a)Q C: O r U U � (U a� N 4-0 Q (1) �' m 0) L ca E L J (� a) ca Cu Q U U U E M Cn CT OO M 0) O 4—/ L O C N C) Cu Cu U) T r--r N Q Ci) to •x O C) N m O (n U) U 0 4-0z)_, ) w o o � L M cU Cu M a) a) (DDCTCT o a) 0 U) 0- U) U) a) CnCn U C:) O O E O N CV O O a- Q� M 8-0 0-' ^ Q OL p� 0 N N Ln O CO O CO V / O C: Ln d CO N r (A � r QCN N _ o — a +,o N D > M - _ c V M N M Cu Q U U L D O N p c0 + O (Dn, W — N 4 r- W 0) Al � O O ^ CU M M N E cn ■ ■ ~ O 0 E U) I I I 0) (6 '�4- —0 -0, Cu O _ 0 Cn L{) a) +� Cn a) � Cn A O LO a) L O B E O = L O D o � CT CD 0 a) LO 0 a) M 0 0- U a) C) U) U) M of LO cn Page 43 of 275 6.a) 6.00 p.m. DS2021-46, Danielle Waters, Planner re- Minor Variance Ap... •N y auR c z CU 3 � E: O O � U .- cc: CL O - Q � U M O C6 LO N N C6 O 0 0 M a L Q Page 44 of 275 6.a) 6.00 p.m. DS2021-46, Danielle Waters, Planner re- Minor Variance Ap... eta uuE LS zt 3 °+ t 3 � � d S v a T N �w O U)+ i C6 CV elf •_C) P1�Gl7h��l� mmm ^^ 0 l.L W U M � O C6 LO N •� N C6 O M cn C c� v CL CL Q Page 45 of 275 6.a) 6.00 p.m. DS2021-46, Danielle Waters, Planner re- Minor Variance Ap... 4101 s �q —Hill ®DDL j -, ODD- Qu I I ODD: ` f ODD: N � \ ODD: N � O O U CL0 Q � U C) Pa, LO Pa` 04 C6 _ .. -01MM ------------ Tin En J1d _ 5 6 q r L = y - ------ - _ ■� pus � �sy Q Page 46 of 275 6.a) 6.00 p.m. DS2021-46, Danielle Waters, Planner re: Minor Variance Ap... J, a � F C/) ,4-1 O O U CL0 Q � U M � O LO Cu N o 4 J O4", o 4-0 0) v.� O " Page 47 of 275 6.a) 6.00 p.m. DS2021-46, Danielle Waters, Planner re: Minor Variance Ap... 4101 t 3 °+ E: i N �= N 0) O O �� C) � U O U MO cq rx �x w Cu \J 75 hr� 4 lO ,p;1 �.. J� a. i Page 48 of 275 6.a) 6.00 p.m. DS2021-46, Danielle Waters, Planner re- Minor Variance Ap... 4101 a Cu QL - - i Q 4-0 Z3 +� ■ CN ; .X 0 Q ,`,' , i, LU U CL0 Q � U M e N •� N ; Cu scam 4-0 i to LU a Page 49 of 275 Ilr , d s . A M 1 6.a) 6-00 p.m. DS2021-46, Danielle Waters, Planner re- Minor Variance Ap CU F • • • LO CN CU r �r: 4..g:fffit ✓ '� �f yV�J �.• F '7' ' .+a: ,gip:., P9. 1 Tom. �• ."� -} Page of 275 6.a) 6.00 p.m. DS2021-46, Danielle Waters, Planner re- Minor Variance Ap... 4101 QL z 3 °+ E: 4--j N Ca�t O ca O - C6 (U o r l.L 4-0 x (�\) 4—I V CO ^ ,.k..'. a 6 L N r C6 N ¢ 0 Cu 75 G J Page 51 of 275 6.a) 6.00 p.m. DS2021-46, Danielle Waters, Planner re: Minor Variance Ap... 4101 } /11� _0 jz � 'Sx a Cu Q O O .. f N 4 O - U � CL0 W `' !LO 4 psi ♦,x` _ Aw- L 6 N A Cu a 3 4--j r Page 52 of 275 6.8) 6.00 p.m. DS2O2]-4S, Danielle Waters, Planner re- Minor Variance Ap.. . 2 ? \ �y , . ) 2 k I :15 ) E 0- C: k k m 0 D k u C 2 § I Cu / ■ I ? 2 ® _ a � 2 e CuI o 2 7 / C? § § / q 3 j E 2 k U) m o m = " 3 \ ± % q 7 e / / 1 @ Cu 9 e o = E 6 \ q > C -0 < 2 o o t § 3 / \ \ _ 2 e 0- / - 2 0 \ 0 0 >1I = ° E ± \ 0 a ) f \ . f j ' / ƒ k w / \ I @ / m _ / 2 E Q - I I ._ 3 � \ \ \ 2 0 &� £ CU 2 0 6 0 a M § % ƒ .ƒ : 0 0 o 2 E _ / R I ) � 0 �_ \ 2 0 2 U) ƒ 2 0 � \ 2 / � � f 7 § � ƒ n 0 0 / § 0 - ƒ � } ¥ 2 g g m m % � E ¥ / 2 ��2OL-OIE@ 2 M o '» 0 5 CO ° ? 12 z 2 $ E 3 .S E Q 2 % Cu \ 2LO0 a) 70 0 � 2 2 2 I E ¥ § / cu-0 § > > 70 •� / U) d - / / 2 0) I 3 � ƒ / y 7 7 I@ Cu I 5 - I 7 - e - \ k / / £ CU / ° � M.E / % % 0 CL> � / $ § E C.2 .@ 2 -0 / U E \ g .0 o E 0 .Cu @ 'e 2 ± E U) 2 E o ® E o 2 § 2 0 e a) o > � Cu ' \ 3 2 / 0 I 0 -0 \ & � _ 2 N C k 2 k 0 2 C Cu » k / - - 4 �2 e '- E - -02 -22 .I .m 2 U) I a I 12 I O- I I e G = o Cu q / C 4- » - 0 CU 0 0 2 R o 2 @ 6 CU 5 a) \ / 2 0 0 17 m 2 % I O / - 0- 0 E % � ® Cu t 2 �y 2f \ 2II2II2 / G ± ® 5 2 E k £ £ § 3 3 E ƒ k § 2 7 F 2 2 7 2 E E C 7 20 2 \ I a / / D / / 3 2 E E / / % / v k ' o & a 6 � � \ Page 53 of 275 6.b) 6.10 p.m. DS2021-38, Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Planner re: Consent A... Township Of Report Fraud Heritage, Exciting Future Report No. To: Prepared By: DS2021-038 Development Services Committee Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Planner Meeting Date: Subject: Motion # April 7, 2021 Consent Application 2021-B-14 by Glenn & Olivia Thornley Roll #: 2 Paisley Court R.M.S. File #: 4346-010-007-10601 D10 59206 Recommendation(s): Requires Action For Information Only It is recommended: 1. That Report DS2021-038 be received and adopted; 2. That the Development Services Committee grant provisional consent to Application 2021-B-14 by Glenn & Olivia Thornley to permit the creation of a new lot consisting of a lot area of approximately 0.4 hectares (1.0 acres) and a frontage of approximately 69.9 metres (229.3 feet) and a retained parcel consisting of a lot area of approximately 0.41 hectares (1.04 acres) and a frontage of approximately 55.8 metres (183.0 feet), subject to the conditions as outlined in Report No. DS2021-038. 3. The conditions for Application 2021-B-14 areas follows: a) That the applicant signs the Township's Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) by which the applicant acknowledges the requirements and timing of matters that may include: payment of development charges, payment of cash in lieu of parkland, detailed design of a building or septic system, and water and sanitary servicing, on either the vacant severed or retained parcel. b) That the applicant pay to the Municipality a fee of $2,000 as a parkland contribution for each residential lot to be created as cash-in-lieu of a parkland contribution pursuant to By-law 2006-50 under the authority of subsection 53(13) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990 c. P. 13; c) That one copy of a Registered Reference Plan of the severed lands prepared by an Ontario Land Surveyor be submitted to the Committee Secretary-Treasurer; d) That the applicant's solicitor prepare and submit a copy of the proposed conveyance for the parcel severed, for review by the Municipality; and e) That all municipal taxes be paid to the Township of Oro-Medonte. 4. And that the applicant be advised of the Development Services Committee's decision under the Secretary Treasurer's signature. Development Services Committee April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-038 Page 1 of 13 Page 54 of 275 6.b) 6.10 p.m. DS2021-38, Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Planner re: Consent A... Background: The subject lands are located at 2 Paisley Court, on the south-west corner of the intersection of Ridge Road West and Paisley Court, and currently support a single detached dwelling. Surrounding land uses consist of low-density residential uses, predominantly in the form of single detached dwellings. A Location Map is included as Schedule 1 to this report and an aerial image is included as Schedule 2 to this report. The purpose of Consent Application 2021-B-14 is the creation of a new residential lot. The Applicant's Consent Sketch is included as Schedule 3. The details of the proposed consent (severance) are provided in the table below: Lands to be Severed: Lands to be Retained: Frontage: Approximately 69.9 m. 229.3 ft. Approx. 55.8 m. 183.0 ft. Depth: Approximately 62.6 m. (205.3 ft.) Approximately 62.7 m. (205.7 ft.) Area: Approximately 0.4 ha. 1.0 ac. Approximately 0.41 ha. 1.04 ac. Use: Proposed Residential Continued Residential Analysis: Provincial Policies Provincial Policy Statement (PPS), 2020 The Provincial Policy Statement provides policy direction on matters of Provincial interest related to land use planning and development. Specifically, Section 1 .1 .4 — Rural Areas, is applicable to this application. This application represents limited residential development that is consistent with the PPS with respect to Rural Areas, as the lands are designated by the Township's Official Plan to generally permit this form of development. The subject lands are located in an established Rural Settlement Area (Shanty Bay) which is intended to be the focus of growth and development and where development is encouraged with consideration to rural characteristics, the scale of development and the provision of appropriate service levels. In Planning Staff's opinion the proposed land use (single detached residential) and the proposed lot sizes and dimensions are consistent the range of lot sizes already existing within the Shanty Bay Settlement Area, are capable of being privately serviced for sewage and water (the majority of lots in Shanty Bay are serviced in this manner) and the development can be accommodated by the existing local road network. Therefore, the application conforms to Section 1.1 .4 of the PPS. Based on the above, Planning Staff finds this application to be consistent with the PPS. A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2020) The Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe provides a long-term plan to manage growth and protect the natural environment. The subject application has been reviewed by planning staff with respect to the Places to Grow policies. Section 2.2.1 of the Growth Plan Development Services Committee April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-038 Page 2 of 13 Page 55 of 275 6.b) 6.10 p.m. DS2021-38, Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Planner re. Consent A... contains policies for "Managing Growth", and states that "Population and employment growth will be accommodated by — a) directing a significant portion of new growth to the built-up areas of the community through intensification ... [and] 1) directing development to settlement areas Since the proposed consent pertains to a residential lot within a settlement area (Shanty Bay), the proposed development is considered to conform with the Province's Growth Plan. County of Simcoe Official Plan Pursuant to Schedule 5.1 of the County's Official Plan, Shanty Bay is identified as a "Settlement" in the Township, the boundaries of which Section 3.5.4 of the County's Official Plan states "are shown in local municipal official plans and are considered to be the approved settlement area boundaries of this Plan." Settlements are developed at higher densities which means that more resource lands and environmentally valuable lands can be conserved. The wide range of land uses provides an opportunity for people to live, work, shop and find recreation in one compact community. The County of Simcoe has not provided the Township with comments on this application to- date and Planning Staff do not expect any County comments at this stage. It is the opinion of Development Services Staff that this application conforms to the County Official Plan. Township of Oro-Medonte Official Plan The subject lands are designated Rural Settlement Area in the Township's Official Plan (refer to Schedule 4). Section C3 contains the policies related to the use and development of land in this designation. Specifically, Section C3.2 of the Official Plan states that "Permitted uses in [this designation include] ... low density residential uses ...... Beyond this provision, Section C3 of the Official Plan is silent with respect to the severance of land in the Rural Settlement Area of Shanty Bay within which the subject lands are located. It is also noted, Section A4 speaks to Shanty Bay Settlement Area strategy for new residential development and is based on the need to provide municipal services as efficiently as possible to settlement areas. Section A4.2.5 deals directly with the strategy for Shanty Bay. It states that new development will be serviced by an expansion to the existing municipal communal water system and private septic systems. The proposed lot creation which is to occur as an infill lot is to occur in an area that has neither municipal water nor is it service by a private communal water system. Section A5 of the Official Plan contains provisions related to Servicing within Shanty Bay. A portion of Shanty Bay is serviced by a municipally owned communal water system. Prior to the creation of any new lot in a settlement area that is to be serviced by a private septic system, Council shall be satisfied that the soils are appropriate for the construction and use of a private septic system on the lot. If the proposed lot is to be serviced by a private well or the municipal communal water supply system, Council shall be satisfied Development Services Committee April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-038 Page 3 of 13 Page 56 of 275 6.b) 6.10 p.m. DS2021-38, Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Planner re. Consent A... that an adequate supply of potable water will be available to service the new lot. The subject property is intended to be serviced by a private septic system and an individual well. Planning staff must defer to the general "Subdivision of Land" policies contained in Section D2.1 and D2.2.1 of the Township's Official Plan, in evaluating the proposed application for consent. These policies and Staff's comments are provided below: Section D2.1 — Preferred Means of Land Division Land division by Plan of Subdivision, rather than by consent, shall generally be required if: a) the extension of an existing public road or the development of a new public road is required to access the proposed lots; or, b) the area that is proposed to be developed is not considered to be infilling; or, c) a Plan of Subdivision is required to ensure that the entire land holding or area is developed in an orderly and efficient manner, or, d) more than four lots including the retained lands are being created and/or the owner is retaining sufficient lands for the development of additional lots. The consent application to approve one (1) new residential lot would meet the general intent of the Township's Official Plan, as the proposed lot will be located on an existing County maintained road. The lot will be created in a form of infilling, and the lot will be developed in an orderly and efficient matter. Section D2.2.1 — New Lot by Consent — General Criteria Section D2.2.1 of the Official Plan contains tests for the creation of a new lot by way of Consent. In particular, this section states "... the Committee of Adjustment shall be satisfied that the lot to be retained and the lot to be severed: a) Fronts on and will be directly accessed by a public road that is maintained on a year round basis.- Conforms- The severed parcel would front onto a County Road, specifically Ridge Road West, which is maintained year-round by the County and the retained parcel would front onto a Township road, specifically Paisley Court, which is maintained year-round by the Township. b) Does not have direct access to a Provincial Highway or County Road, unless the Province or the County supports the request; Comments: the severed parcel is to have direct access to a County Road (Ridge Road West). The application was circulated to the County of Simcoe and comments have not been received at the time of writing this report. Planning Staff have reviewed the relevant policies of the County Official Plan and provide the following comments: Development Services Committee April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-038 Page 4 of 13 Page 57 of 275 6.b) 6.10 p.m. DS2021-38, Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Planner re. Consent A... - Settlements are the focus of population growth and development (Section 3.5.1); - Settlements are to be developed in a compact urban form that promotes the efficient use of land and provision of water, sewer, transportation, and other services (Section 3.5.2); - Settlements are to promote development forms and patterns which minimize land consumption and servicing costs (Section 3.5.4); - Lots may be created only where they have access to and frontage on a public highway and where an access permit to that highway can be obtained in accordance with the policies of this Plan and the County of Simcoe, the Province of Ontario, or local municipalities (Section 3.3.4); and, - New entrances shall not be permitted to individual residential lots created on County Roads following June 30, 1996, except in settlement areas designated in Official Plans and in accordance with the requirements of the County Entrance By-law regulating access to County Roads (Section 4.8.32). Planning Staff is of the opinion that this application conforms to the County's Official Plan for lot creation and would satisfy this test, however, Committee should have regard to any comments that may be received from the County on this matter. c) Will not cause a traffic hazard; Conforms: Upon site visit, Planning Staff noted that the severed parcel would require a new entrance. No traffic concerns have been identified by the Operations Department or the County of Simcoe, but the applicant will be required to obtain an entrance permit from the County for the new lot. d) Has adequate size and frontage for the proposed use in accordance with the Comprehensive Zoning By-law and is compatible with adjacent uses,- Conforms- The severed and retained parcels will meet the size and frontage requirements of the Zoning By-law and the proposed lots will be compatible with adjacent uses. e) Can be serviced with an appropriate water supply and means of sewage disposal; Comments: the existing dwelling on the retained lot is currently being serviced by a well and private septic system. The Building Division is responsible for matters related to septic systems. Building comments have not been received at the time of writing this report and the Committee have regard for any comments received. f) Will not have a negative impact on the drainage patterns in the area,- Conforms- The Development Engineering Division is responsible for matters related to drainage and at the time of writing this report, comments have not been received. Committee should have regard to any comments that may be received from Development Engineering. Development Services Committee April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-038 Page 5 of 13 Page 58 of 275 6.b) 6.10 p.m. DS2021-38, Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Planner re. Consent A... g) Will not restrict the development of the retained lands or other parcels of land, particularly as it relates to the provision of access, if they are designated for development by this Plan,- Conforms- The retained lands are not designated or sized to accommodate development beyond the level of their current use, which is for single detached residential purposes. Additionally, development of and access to the retained lands or other parcels will not be restricted. h) Will not have a negative impact on the features and functions of any ecological feature in the area,- Conforms- no natural heritage concerns have been identified by the Township and agencies in their review of this application. i) Will not have a negative impact on the quality and quantity of groundwater available for other uses in the area,- Conforms- The applicant will be required at the time of building permit submission to meet all requirements for septic system installation and private water supply. No groundwater concerns have been identified by the Township and agencies in their review of this application. j) Will conform to Section 51(24) of the Planning Act, as amended. Provisional consent may be granted subject to appropriate conditions of approval for the severed and/or retained lot. Conforms: The Consent application has been reviewed in context to Section 51(24) of the Planning Act and it is Staff's opinion that the application conforms. Based on the above, Planning Staff is of the opinion that the application conforms to the Official Plan. Zoning By-law 97-95 The subject lands are zoned Rural Residential One (RUR1) in the Township's Zoning By-law 97-95, as amended (refer to Schedule 5). Single detached dwellings are permitted in the Rural Residential One (RUR1) Zone and the frontages and areas of the severed and retained lands would comply with the provisions of the Zoning By-law. Financial / Legal Implications / Risk Management: Potential financial and legal implications should the decision of the Committee be appealed to the Local Planning Appeals Tribunal and Council chooses to defend the Committee's decision. Development Services Committee April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-038 Page 6 of 13 Page 59 of 275 6.b) 6.10 p.m. DS2021-38, Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Planner re: Consent A... Policies/Legislation: • Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13 • Provincial Policy Statement, 2020 • A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, 2020 • County of Simcoe Official Plan • Township of Oro-Medonte Official Plan • Township of Oro-Medonte Zoning By-law No. 97-95, as amended Corporate Strategic Goals: Planning Staff is of the opinion that this application is consistent with the following Strategic Goal of the Township: Balanced Growth: • Ensure land use planning policies manage change and promote economic activity that does not negatively impact the Township's natural heritage features and attributes. Consultations: Notice of this application was circulated to the public and to applicable review agencies and Township departments, a public notice sign was also posted on the subject lands. As of the preparation of this report, the following comments have been received: • Operations Division — No objection. • Bell Canada — No concerns. • Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority— lot is not regulated; no comments. Attachments: Schedule 1 : Location Map Schedule 2: Aerial Photo Schedule 3: Applicant's Consent Sketch Schedule 4: Official Plan Land Use Schedule 5: Zoning By-law Conclusion: Based on Planning Staff's analysis of this application, it is recommended that Consent Application 2021-B-14 be approved for the reasons that: • The application is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement 2020 and conforms to the Growth Plan 2020, the Official Plans for the Township of Oro-Medonte and the County of Simcoe; • The consent complies with the criteria in Section 51(24) of the Planning Act; and, • The application represent good planning. Development Services Committee April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-038 Page 7 of 13 Page 60 of 275 6.b) 6.10 p.m. DS2021-38, Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Planner re. Consent A... Respectfully submitted: Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Planner Approvals: Date: Derek Witlib, Manager Planning Services March 31, 2021 Andria Leigh, Director Development Services March 31, 2021 Development Services Committee April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-038 Page 8 of 13 Page 61 of 275 6.b) 6.10 p.m. DS2021-38, Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Planner re- Consent A... } Rdr 49 51 53 55 57 59 61 63 46 Moass6o 6 Red oak Cres. se�ha n le s i U 52 54 56 58 60 62 U 64 66 e i ,xe 48 = C c m 5 7 4 5 1033 tiid Rao 6 8 9 6 7 63 �54 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20T22 24 26 28 30 eSt. Martine Cres. 32 Q� 49 2 5 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 2287 Rid 13 2108 2092 2315 2227 ge coo � W. 20E 2 2297 9 .; 7 2267 6 2235 4 �e3 1 3 5 6 271 2327 267 6 231 2249 239 227 �ak st 132 61 51 221 2251 209 18 195 1 2 171 165 126 112 153 143 102 123 Kempenfe[t 133 115 Bay 107 99 Schedule 1 Location r � �az�of ® 0 Subject Lands Proud heritage,,Exciting Future 0 200 M File Number:2021-B-14 Development Services Committee April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-038 Page 9 of 13 Page 62 of 275 6.b) 6.10 p.m. DS2021-38, Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Planner re- Consent A... —1117 Rd.— �Moons[one•Rd. Hnrsesko•Ya IId Redge Rd.Uy r r r � C1 � >r ?? a Ann Wood Copse i Schedule 2 Aerial Photo Townshapnf Subject Lands Proud Heritage,Exciting Future 0 40 m File Number:2021-B-14 N I 1 1 1 1 Development Services Committee April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-038 Page 10 of 13 Page 63 of 275 6.b) 6.10 p.m. DS2021-38, Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Planner re: Consent A... m 0 3�sd E C E pa`S`Q� Gt �J'ralsrtd d _ - .E ' q r r N L! M1, r ti C' 1. a.. Schedule 3 Applicant's Consent Sketch Tcums6rrp af��'� File Number 202 1-B-14 Proud Heritage,Exciting Future Development Services Committee April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-038 Page 11 of 13 Page 64 of 275 6.b) 6.10 p.m. DS2021-38, Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Planner re- Consent A... .--yas�Rd.T �Moanstone•Rd. estioe•Ialley lRd. N r a, Basswood-Cir. —kidRe U} � U c M y J fC 7 C L L Ct. O Ham St Marltine_Cres. R��ke s� of zo�R� � ,1.- SSi MelaSsa C`s age Rci.yy Ann.wooaf=Copse a� Qa in c ff3 I Ch�r�h eNu Q Bey-St � St.R� 4 J Brook:St. t. r ,J !G Schedule 4 Township Official Plan - Land Use a C.'SubjectLands 0 Rural M Rural Settlement Area Tnwreship o!/!� Agricultural =Shoreline Proud Heritage,Exciting Future 0 400 n1 File Number:2021-B-14 N I 1 1 1 1 Development Services Committee April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-038 Page 12 of 13 Page 65 of 275 6.b) 6.10 p.m. DS2021-38, Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Planner re- Consent A... 7asJa— RI T- - Red Oak Cres. Be:no•va kr1�c. ICID r I � � ' V Id, .� -A/-RU _ u __� R R1 0 Rl 1Rwl9e. R tr Q t7 RURL*8 A/RU �Jces S RURL*82 1; Martine Cres. RI Ridge Rq;W A/RU A/RU ye� RURL at Os Q A/RU-15 SR RLS(H) R1 ea RLS 4 R1 RLS(H) RLS(H) RI(H L/1. RL J RLS(H) SR lQ� 111 � Schedule 5 0 RS(Residential One) Existing Zoning 0 RUR1(Rural Residential One) lbw rrshrp of 0 SR(Shoreline Residential) 0��few 0 RLS(Residential Limited Service) 1 Subject Lands Proud Heritage,Exciting Future i 0 A/RU(Agricultural/Rural) 0 OS(Open Space) 0 200 m File Number:2021-6-14 N r I Development Services Committee April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-038 Page 13 of 13 Page 66 of 275 6.b) 6.10 p.m. DS2021-38, Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Planner re: Consent A... From: Moyle,Jacqueline<jacqueline.moyle@bell.ca> Sent: Friday, March 19, 2021 11:53 AM To: Falconi,Teresa <tfalconi@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: 705-21-184 RE: Notice of Public Hearing - Development Services Committee Meeting, April 07, 2021 (2021-B-14)Thornley Hi Teresa, Re: 2021-B-14 Details: • Application for Consent • 2 Paisley Court • Township of Oro-Medonte • Bell File 705-21-184 Subsequent to review by our local Engineering Department of the subject lands for the above noted consent file, it has been determined that Bell Canada has no concerns with respect to the proposed application. If there are any questions or concerns,please do not hesitate to contact me. Thanks Jacquie Jacqueline Moyle External Liaison Bell Canada Right of Way WI 140 Bayfield St. FL 2 Barrie, ON, L41VI 3B1 P: 705-722-2636 F: 705-726-4600 iacgueline.moyle(cDbell.ca Page 67 of 275 6.b) 6.10 p.m. DS2021-38, Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Planner re. Consent A... From: Metras,Justin <jmetras@oro-medonte.ca> Sent: Friday, March 19, 2021 11:30 AM To: Falconi,Teresa <tfalconi@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Re: Notice of Public Hearing - Development Services Committee Meeting, April 07, 2021 (2021- B-14)Thornley Teresa Operations has no objections to this application. Justin Page 68 of 275 6.b) 6.10 p.m. DS2O21-38, Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Planner re. Consent A... From: Shawn Filson <S.Filson@Isrca.on.ca> Sent: March 24, 2021 2:19 PM To: Karaiskakis,Andy<aKaraiskakis@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: 2 Paisley Court(2021-B-14) Hi Andy, LSRCA was circulated for a consent application for 2 Paisley Court however since the lot is not regulated we have no comments to offer. Shawn Filson, MSc. Planner 1 Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority 120 Bayview Parkway, Newmarket,Ontario BY 3W3 Cell: 1-249-288-1356 Office: 905-895-1281,ext.229 1 1-800-465-0437 s.filson@LSRCA.on.ca I www.LSRCA.on.ca Page 69 of 275 6.b) 6.10 p.m. DS2021-38, Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Planner re. Consent A... From: Diane Saunders <dial60ccm@gmail.com> Date:Tuesday, March 30, 2021 at 4:20 PM To: "celeste@cplan.ca" <celeste@cplan.ca> Subject: Re: Property at 2 Paisley Court To whom it may concern, We live at 6 Paisley Court, Oro-Medonte, Ontario and support the severance application filed by Glenn & Lorrie Thornley at 2 Paisley Court.We feel that the lot severance will not have any impact on our subdivision. Sincerely, Albert& Diane Saunders Page 70 of 275 6.b 6:10 m. DS2021-38 And A 17 2021 D vslop entSeryi Goner re: Consent A... p y6t ;4g2r Ijk ;�� r i i County of Simcoe Main Line(705)726 9300 MCOUNTYOF Transportation and Toll Free 1 866 893 9300 SI " CO� Engineering Highway 26, Fax(705)727 7984 TRANSPORTATION AND �l Web: simcoe.ca ENGINEERING / -MV Midhurst, Ontario L9X 1 N6 April 6, 2021 Andy Karaiskakis **VIA EMAIL** Secretary-Treasurer Township of Oro-Medonte 148 Line 7 South Oro-Medonte, ON LOL 2EO Dear Mr. Karaiskakis, RE: Consent Application 2021-B-14 (Thornley) 2 Paisley Court, Township of Oro-Medonte, County of Simcoe Thank you for circulating the above-noted Application to the County of Simcoe for review. The existing right-of- way on Ridge Road West (County Road 20) adjacent to the subject property is approximately 19.5 metres wide. In accordance with Table 5.4 of the Simcoe County Official Plan, the required basic right-of-way width for Ridge Road West (County Road 20) is 30.5 metres. County staff has reviewed this requirement and feel that the full right-of-way width is necessary for future road maintenance, road improvements and stormwater flow from Ridge Road West (County Road 20). In order to meet this right-of-way requirement, the County will require a road widening of approximately 3.25 metres. The Simcoe County Official Plan also states the requirement for daylight (sight) triangles. The County standard for daylight (sight) triangles is 15 metres X 15 metres. These dimensions are applied to the limit of the right-of- way. The County of Simcoe's Transportation & Engineering Department would have no objection to the approval of the Application, provided the following conditions were included: 1. The Applicant shall transfer to the Corporation of the County of Simcoe ("County"), at no cost, a fee simple, unencumbered interest in the following: • A road allowance widening along the entire frontage of the subject property adjacent to Ridge Road West (County Road 20) to provide a 15.25 metre right-of-way from the centreline of Ridge Road West (County Road 20). • A daylight (sight) triangle measuring 15 metres east-west X 15 metres north-south at the north- east corner of the property adjacent to Ridge Road West (County Road 20) and Paisley Court. The Applicant shall submit to the satisfaction of the County's Transportation and Engineering Department a preliminary reference plan (1 copy and 1 electronic copy) which sets out the road widening and daylight (sight) triangle to be transferred to the County. Upon approval, the County will instruct the surveyor to deposit the reference plan in the Land Registry Office for Simcoe Page 71 of 275 6.b) 6.10 p.m. DS2021-38, Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Planner re. Consent A... County Comments - 2 County and request the surveyor provide the County with 1 copy and 1 electronic copy of the deposited reference plan. All costs associated with the land transfer, including costs relating to surveying, legal fees, and disbursements, agreements, HST, etc. shall be fully borne by the applicant. All legal documentation is to be negotiated, prepared and registered by the Legal Services Department of the County and to be executed where required by the Applicant. The Applicant shall submit to the Legal Services Department of the County a deposit in the amount of$1000.00 prior to the services being rendered. Invoices will be submitted on a cost recovery basis and applied against the deposit. Additional deposits may be required, and any excess over the total invoices will be refunded. The County of Simcoe is requesting the road widening and daylight (sight) triangle pursuant to Section 53(12) of the Planning Act and such land will form part of the highway to the extent of the designated widening in accordance with Section 31(6) of the Municipal Act, 2001. The widening of Ridge Road West (County Road 20) and the daylight (sight) triangle are required pursuant to the County's standards for the construction and is consistent with proper safety standards. Prior to stamping the deed by the Township of Oro-Medonte, the Applicant shall obtain written clearance from the County of Simcoe for the above-noted condition. The County of Simcoe Entrance By-law No. 5544 regulates the construction, alteration or change in the use of any private or public entranceway, gate or other structure or facility that permits access to a County Road. An Entrance Permit will be required for the severed land to access Ridge Road West (County Road 20). The County of Simcoe Setback By-law No. 5604 regulates the location of buildings and other structures on lands adjacent to County Roads. Any new buildings and other structures must be located 10.0 metres from any requested road allowance widening. Structures include, but aren't limited to: septic systems and fields, retaining walls, wells and buildings. If you require any further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, The Corporation of the County of Simcoe nTlDvq� Stefanie Thorne, C.Tech. Engineering Technician II (705) 726-9300 ext. 1006 C.C. Julie Scruton, County of Simcoe Dan Amadio, County of Simcoe Page 72 of 275 6.b) 6.10 p.m. DS2021-38, Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Planner re: Consent A... 4101 'g-y-aull 'S Z auil a� y� u land`. / tnee ♦ I x I� Q' ya U mm Jinn. O I a v n N O N O 0� ca U 0 L Q .CL � a) O E cu U a) U) 0 a) 0 O '� � a O }' � N O t� Page 73 of 275 6.b) 6.10 p.m. DS2021-38, Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Planner re: Consent A... 4101 cn #� M cu N ti ^ > O O a) co N T a) L � U N N ca p N N � O C U) Lr) N �' �_ u x cU c- U O Q O X Q Q- o m O Q Q c: Q ca 4-0 N � O N a) . . a� � a) O o � � � � U +0 (� C'') C'') M U a) � 60 O to U 70 N .— O cn cn CL O ca Q > E E Q U)4-0 O rn +-0 U) o ai (N ca � Q •V U) J (a (a � � C) O o 0 0 O i L L L C) �, Q- QLQLQL QQQ O o cn 0) CO aa) ii0QD Page 74 of 275 6.b) 6.10 p.m. DS2021-38, Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Planner re: Consent A... lsred 3 - � w .c E: n� W O m a ' °r r L` t N N O C6 U QL Q (D U) O U 0 0 0 a L Q Page 75 of 275 6.b) 6.10 p.m. DS2021-38, Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Planner re: Consent A... 1 oo? ?C n Py�s\ey�w. d fo E t� i `O i O .< C6 U QL Q N U a O U '— �a M M a Page 76 of 275 6.b) 6.10 p.m. DS2021-38, Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Planner re. Consent A... }g ua��q-0 i7 'S 7-au � Cry z ^^ '�a-aue�❑ _W O v 0 Tonnav � o , m N O N O Ca U QL QL Q CIO qD -1--j r. -:J� c: M O — O v L U � co o . . ❑ ❑ •CL v � , L i H J MMj Page 77 of 275 6.b) 6.10 p.m. DS2021-38, Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Planner re. Consent A... t w x 3 cc .0 rl � N N � .0 iF rl ' � 0 I N O Q N - O Ca U QL QL Q a O c/) o °' O �-. I-- a, ce U � o � � J - •— v, "0 Rs u IL I, O CC � '3 L cn CU N e L c .� ceLn Q-� L"n, a o W i 1 Page 78 of 275 6.b) 6.10 p.m. DS2021-38, Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Planner re: Consent A... 4101 O0 ; a'' T _0 I ja c: - (D a) � O I G' r ' cu N � o O N � o O _o Cu U _O r' l�^ V, CU /A' a Y/ O U � 0 O Y �s n 3' ek W 0 Page 79 of 275 6.b) 6.10 p.m. DS2021-38, Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Planner re: Consent A... -0 w 0 cU cu ° O O +� 0) (6 O � o m I .� O N c O Cu � _ o 4-0 0 (u M - O O U a, rt i f Page 80 of 275 6.b) 6.10 p.m. DS2021-38, Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Planner re- Consent A... N�. 0 .� E _ w o 0c- }. x to 0) � U cn 0 a) 0 o T c m 4-0 o cn N oU O oo 0- ca U (D 0 CLcu 0 >, 0 •ca 0 0- 0) > ca Page 81 of 275 6.b) 6.10 p.m. DS2021-38, Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Planner re- Consent A... D o � c c m d = t D O O m •� C N a0+ _ D ma a�i 0 N Rio c O }} c > m c � � � � Oa aai c -- - O f� t oU 'y m O 72 N C a0+ D N m v3 o 'Z U i fn ar H C A O Q d m D o 0 O D >, p C E A a'C E rn H a O V a vi O F" O i -0i � U +'.�-. � OarU y C O 02 m 2V N cc C (0 f3 O C i cc O y .2E a� i T 0 co N 'r N c- N C C U C.ar y O air y � y O O m coO i ar C N to D m N ar c m cu _ N D 0 Q) a0+ 5 D i C ay+ cc O ay.+ 0 O N c m .� E c 5m _ cc •i a .SN E -0 O Dy m i 3 cc m C c co m D E c a� o o a o 4:- o D : O � 2 � O D Q0z �' m 0 o Ev v, i o — O N 0 j, -O _0 C C.i N D U c E Q �, y 3 cyy � v� y ycu QD c) m 0 `H0 t m Q' - D E a.+ ar 0 � ,C N O U y t O > `N J O V i -N E O C ar ' a O)i c N ~ 2 C O O O D E •� L CELL a = c � y i m m U m E Q O m o 0 S O O d d CO1 0 C 0 0.0 a) a) prN co .5 LwEy � CL car o C c U co D (n N LO M L •> >`ar N 2 D D O Q w 0 co O 0 - - 0 2`O D !2 D O a) D a 0 V) - c 0 i N C i � v_ 'O 2 U -p m e � m m c c 0 a N •- 4 Q a) T c D ,� a--1 c 0 a) O i N (n N � N N � U ° m : MLu � 0 O V cc D O �-O - -a y D Z m O m fn -O 0) c ., a m c c 'D a1 w O N N OO � m O oyyy cyNmm -ia D C) U N O U N MO 0 .0 d t i C O M C c N N _'O � U) T ON V) •ar iar � y (n m c 00 0) y a w (A N a 0 c D U � m C N = H 0 a O W t O Q Q U D E y L y i Car y 0 N �0 Q E o 0 0 CU :3 y H � a (n >% o _ oaMo 5 m� pU E — `° ci c R � o E Uc av a) °� a� � � E cm � c � m � � Cy0m0w +oaCD O U O O N m 0 0 O D N U •i U w N m ,F a) O CD C a) E r- m p > U � 3 0 0 y 0 c U ar 62 U A ' D � 6 ao O O c) D .a 1 r � � r O Q-0 1— r ' O cc O cLo O CyM D +�.' m N4- -E .aa+ Q-a1 Op a) (n .� OY T -O N ER Lr) O �0 c m fA cc c O Q m 0 ccOm � O co E oco C0y0 '0 DB . a 'O a-O O >, D ' c 0 CL 0 0 E H E E t a) a m . (n a) a w (Dcu i a D -° m w U y c O Q Q) a ) `-T � c Q � � N c0 3 � Qy � ~ a>i D m O , f3 c m M v t L 0- O 2 U 0 C)0 0 �'D a) a aa) V/ > O (A D D 0 0 Q O M N O 'C D O Q ar y D -O O U U C O ~ Q Q D c i p N E cc O -0 y C 0 O' Q _0 O ■O 2 2 0 N O -O m 2 ,� D E y c umi cmi 'a C O D .fOn V V w C D D O = V) in tmD > U M (n c 2 u5 - 2Q�� yOcccc0 — Omy� OU) D p O m 'a . O c m C w •C 2 >, a c 0 C 7— m Dar . NO E Q ¢ 0 D 0 .0 LO T V - M am R R >% N Dy0.V .Q- U N O .E m 2 Q >, D Q(O 0 a c a1Q �_ D 3 U c Q c a O aN CLC 0 p0 m a>) mOp aUi Dt +aH C01 C0.1 i N > m E m D _ .0 D D N c M art C C O a0a N O D -_ D 'DO 0 0 cc (0 a� c O r tm i E D 0 V D 0= m D C m 7 m c % 0 L 0 O t c) L >L M 0 m 0 O N D - x O i s E m m 0 H .� > HmH H R 'aU U i i w NararHH E t D U D AV+ O H H ms H m 'Ua Ow Q W N � N M V Page 82 of 275 6.c) 6.20 p.m. DS2021-39, Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Planner re: Minor Var... 1 ownship o f Report 0 Proud Heritruge, Exciting Feature Report No. To: Prepared By: DS2021-039 Development Services Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Committee Planner Meeting Date: Subject: Motion # April 7, 2021 Minor Variance Application 2021-A-13 Roll #: Stephen and Lisa Hill R.M.S. File #: 4346-010-012-10900 2269 Lakeshore Road East D13 59151 Recommendation(s): Requires Action For Information Only It is recommended: 1 . That Report No. DS2021-039 be received and adopted. 2. That Minor Variance Application 2021-A-13 by Stephen and Lisa Hill, specifically to permit the construction of additions to the front and rear of the existing dwelling with a minimum westerly interior side yard setback of 1.5 metres (4.9 feet), on lands municipally known as 2269 Lakeshore Road East, be approved, subject to the conditions as outlined in Report DS2021-039. 3. The conditions are as follows: a) That notwithstanding Section 4.0 Table B1 , Sections 5.9.1 and 5.16.1, the development shall otherwise comply with all other applicable provisions of the Zoning By-law; b) That the proposed addition be substantially and proportionally in conformity with the dimensions as set out on the application and sketches submitted and approved by the Committee; c) That the applicants satisfy any permits and/or approvals required from the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority (LSRCA); d) That, if required, an Ontario Land Surveyor (OLS), Professional Engineer (P.Eng.) or Certified Engineering Technologist (C.E.T.) verify by pinning the foundation wall and verifying in writing by way of survey/real property report, prior to the pouring of the footing and if no footing, the foundation, that the additions are located no closer than 1 .5 metres (4.9 feet) from the westerly side lot line; and, e) That the appropriate Zoning Certificate, Engineered Lot Grading Plan, and Building Permit be obtained from the Township only after the Committee's decision becomes final and binding, as provided for within the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P. 13. Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-039 Page 1 of 13 Page 83 of 275 6.c) 6.20 p.m. DS2021-39, Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Planner re. Minor Var... 4. And that the applicant be advised of the Development Services Committee's decision under the Secretary-Treasurer's signature. Background: The subject property has a lot area of 0.14 hectares (0.34 acres) and currently supports a dwelling and a boathouse. A Location Map and Aerial Photo are included as Schedules 1 and 2 to this report. The applicants are proposing to construct additions to the front (22.3 sq.m. dwelling addition; 23.6 sq.m. veranda) and rear (49.1 sq.m. sunroom/deck) of the dwelling and are seeking relief to the following sections of Zoning By-law 97-95: Section 4.0 - Table 131 — Standards for Permitted Uses in SR Zone Minimum Required Interior Side Yard: Proposed: 3.0 metres (9.8 feet) 1 .5 metres (4.9 feet) Section 5.9.1 — Encroachments in required yards Permitted: Proposed: Unenclosed porches, decks and balconies Front additions (22.3 sq.m. dwelling may encroach into any required yard a addition; 23.6 sq.m. veranda) and rear 3- distance of not more than 1.0 metres (3.2 season sunroom/covered deck addition feet) (49.1 sq.m.) are proposed to encroach 1.5 metre (4.9 feet) into the required 3.0 metre (9.8 feet) setback from the westerly interior side lot line Section 5.16.1 — Non-Complying Buildings and Structures Enlargement, Repair or Renovation Required: Proposed: A non-complying building or structure may To permit front and rear additions to the be enlarged, repaired, replaced or existing dwelling with an interior side yard renovated provided that the enlargement, setback of 1.5 metres (4.9 feet) repair, replacement or renovation: a) Does not further encroach into a required yard; b) Does not increase the useable floor area in a required yard; c) Does not in any other way increase a situation of non-compliance; and, d) Complies with all other applicable provisions of this By-law The applicant's site plan and elevation drawings are included as Schedules 3 and 4 to this report. Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-039 Page 2 of 13 Page 84 of 275 6.c) 6.20 p.m. DS2021-39, Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Planner re: Minor Var... Analysis: Provincial Policies Provincial Policy Statement, 2020 The Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) provides policy direction on matters of Provincial interest related to land use planning and development. Specifically, Section 1.1 .4 — Rural Areas, Section 2.1 — Natural Heritage, Section 2.2 — Water and Section 3.1 — Natural Hazards are applicable to this application. This application represents limited, resource-based (shoreline) residential development that is consistent with the PPS with respect to Rural Areas. The application is also consistent with the Natural Heritage, Water and Natural Hazards policies of the PPS, as the proposed development is not anticipated to impact any natural features or functions. A Place to Grow, Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe 2020 A Place to Grow provides a long-term plan to manage growth and protect the natural environment. Section 2.2.9 Rural Areas is applicable to this application. This section has been reviewed and Planning Staff are of the opinion that the proposed dwelling additions are consistent with the Rural Areas policies in the Growth Plan as the lands subject to this application are already within an established shoreline residential area. The proposed development is located within 120 metres of an inland lake (Lake Simcoe). Section 4.2.4.5 of the Growth Plan permits development outside of settlement areas, in developed shoreline areas of inland lakes that are designated or zoned, as of July 1, 2017, for concentrations of shoreline residential development subject to certain conditions. Planning Staff is of the opinion that the proposed development conforms to the Growth Plan as the lands subject to this application are already within an established shoreline residential area. Lake Simcoe Protection Plan (LSPP) The subject lands are located within the Lake Simcoe watershed where development is subject to the policies of the Lake Simcoe Protection Plan (LSPP) which came into effect in 2009. Planning Staff have reviewed the applicable policies of the LSPP and are of the opinion that the application is consistent with the natural heritage and hazard policies of the LSPP. Specifically, Section 6.45 DP states: "the construction of a building on an existing lot of record is permitted, provided it was zoned for such as of the date the Plan came into effect." As the subject property is partially within the regulated area, the proposed works will require a permit from the LSRCA and that any approval of this application should be subject to a condition for the Owners to obtain a permit from the LSRCA for works within the regulated area. Condition (c) as noted in the Recommendation confirms the requirement to obtain the necessary permit from the LSRCA. Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-039 Page 3 of 13 Page 85 of 275 6.c) 6.20 p.m. DS2021-39, Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Planner re. Minor Var... At the time of writing of this report, comments have yet to be received by Township Staff. The Committee should have regard to any LSRCA comments that may be received. County Official Plan The property is designated Rural in the County of Simcoe's Official Plan. The Rural designation permits limited residential development. In Planning Staff's opinion, the applicant's minor variance application conforms to the County's Official Plan as the construction of the additions to the existing single detached dwelling is permitted on the subject lands. Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13 Section 3(5) of the Planning Act states that all decisions in respect of the exercise of any authority that affects a planning matter shall be consistent with provincial policy statements and shall conform with or shall not conflict with the provincial plans that is in effect on the date of the decision. Section 45(1) of the Planning Act establishes a four-fold test for a minor variance which requires consideration of: (1) whether the variance is minor; (2) whether the variance is desirable for the appropriate development or use of the land, building or structure; (3) whether the general purpose and intent of the zoning by-law is maintained; and (4) whether the general purpose and intent of the Official Plan is maintained. A variance must meet all four of these tests. Planning Staff has reviewed this application against these four tests as follows: Do the variances conform to the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan? The subject lands are designated Shoreline in the Township's Official Plan (refer to Schedule 5). Pursuant to the policies of the Plan, permitted uses within the Shoreline designation include a single detached dwelling. Therefore, based on the above, the requested variances pertaining to the construction of additions to an existing single detached dwelling are considered to conform to Official Plan. Do the variances conform to the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law? The subject property is zoned Shoreline Residential (SR) in the Township's Zoning By- law 97-95, as amended (refer to Schedule 6). A single detached dwelling is permitted in the SR Zone. The applicants are proposing to build additions to the front and rear of the existing single detached dwelling. The dwelling was built in 1957 (prior to current Zoning By-law 97-95) according to property assessment records and the existing dwelling is situated at least 1.5 metres (4.9 feet) from the westerly interior side lot line, whereas the Zoning By-law requires a minimum of 3.0 metres (9.8 feet). The applicants are proposing that the additions come no closer to the side lot line than the existing dwelling. Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-039 Page 4 of 13 Page 86 of 275 6.c) 6.20 p.m. DS2021-39, Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Planner re. Minor Var... The general intent of the Zoning By-law in requiring a minimum interior side yard setback is to provide adequate space for access, maintenance and drainage around a dwelling, as well to provide separation between dwellings on neighbouring properties for purposes of privacy and maintaining a low-density, aesthetically pleasing residential environment. In Planning Staff's opinion, the proposed additions will not negatively impact the neighbouring property as the additions will maintain the existing 1 .5 metres setback that currently exist for the dwelling. Furthermore, the dwelling is more than 4 metres (13 feet) setback from the easterly interior side yard which provides adequate space for the management of driveway drainage and winter snow storage without negatively impacting the neighbouring property. As the subject lands are within a plan of subdivision, the proposed development would be subject to the Township's Engineered Lot Grading (ELG) requirements through the Building Permit process. An ELG is a detailed engineered plan requiring approval from the Township that would, among other things, address grading details and downspout locations to ensure that the proposed construction does not direct new or additional drainage or rain/snow shed onto neighbouring properties. For the reasons outlined above, Planning Staff is of the opinion that the requested variances are considered to meet the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law. Are the variances desirable for the appropriate development of the lot? The size and location of the additions will not interfere with functional matters such as parking and the septic system or the ability of the subject lands to continue to have an adequately sized and functional rear yard amenity area. Therefore, Planning Staff are satisfied that the proposed development would be considered desirable for the appropriate development of the lot. Are the variances minor? The question of the minor nature of the variances relates to its scale and impact. In Planning Staff's opinion, the requested Minor Variances are minor in nature as the proposed additions are not anticipated to have an adverse impact on the character and appearance of the neighbourhood. As the proposed variances are considered to conform to the general intent of the Official Plan, the general intent of the Zoning By-law, to be appropriate for the desirable development of the lot, and are not anticipated to have an adverse effect on the character of the surrounding area or the use and enjoyment of surrounding properties, the variances are considered to be minor. Financial / Legal Implications / Risk Management: Potential financial and legal implications should the decision of the Committee be appealed to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT) and Council chooses to defend the Committee's decision. Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-039 Page 5 of 13 Page 87 of 275 6.c) 6.20 p.m. DS2021-39, Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Planner re. Minor Var... Policies/Legislation: • Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13 • Provincial Policy Statement, 2020 • A Place to Grow, 2020 • Lake Simcoe Protection Plan • County of Simcoe Official Plan • Township of Oro-Medonte Official Plan • Township of Oro-Medonte Zoning By-law No. 97-95, as amended Corporate Strategic Goals: In 2016, Council adopted the Township's Strategic Plan. The following Goals of the Plan is relevant to this application: Balanced Growth: • Ensure land use planning policies manage change and promote economic activity that does not negatively impact the Township's natural heritage features and attributes. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed development is consistent with the Strategic Plan. Consultations: Notice of this application was circulated to the public and to various review agencies and Township departments. A Public Notice sign was also posted on the subject lands. As of the preparation of this report, the following comments have been received: • Township Building Division — Building Permit review to include proximity to sewage system. Attachments: Schedule 1: Location Map Schedule 2: Aerial Photo Schedule 3: Applicant's Proposed Site Plan Schedule 4: Applicant's Elevation Drawings Schedule 5: Township Official Plan Land Use Schedule 6: Zoning By-law Conclusion: Planning Staff recommends that Minor Variance Application 2021-A-13 be approved, specifically, to permit additions to the front and rear of the existing dwelling with a Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-039 Page 6 of 13 Page 88 of 275 6.c) 6.20 p.m. DS2021-39, Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Planner re. Minor Var... minimum easterly interior side yard setback of 1 .5 metres (4.9 feet), on the basis that the application meets the four tests of the Planning Act, is consistent with the PPS and conforms to the Growth Plan. Respectfully submitted: Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Planner Approvals: Date Derek Witlib, Manager, Planning Services March 31, 2021 Andria Leigh, Director, Development Services March 31 , 2021 Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-039 Page 7 of 13 Page 89 of 275 6.c) 6.20 p.m. DS2021-39, Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Planner re: Minor Var... VaseyRM .taeeesF,aa rta. 2296 2304 na.ai sn?e-Vaile�y11W 1 W. 2300 . R' 2298 C In V 2294 2290 385 2288 2299 2286 2284 2297 2272 2278 2295 2274 2293 2266 2285 2289 2287 2260 2262 2268 2252 2256 ,,Qj6 R d�. 2283 2254 2248 2258 VaKe 2277 279 2281 2246 2250 2275 2242 271 2273 2265 267 257 2261 2253 2259 2249 2255 245 2251 247 243 Lake Simcoe Schedule 1 Location ® � ` up� 10 Subject Lands ,"Proud Heritage,Exciting Future 0 100 nl File Number:2021-A-13 41 I i i 1 I Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-039 Page 8 of 13 Page 90 of 275 6.c) 6.20 p.m. DS2021-39, Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Planner re: Minor Var... .,snpa•vaw C 9.16 _rl . . KeSho . ow -•na. 4a . c G m t Ci r kA Schedule 2 Aerial Photo 4r4� TOWt7S�[IjJ 0e Subject Lands j Proud Heritage,Exciting P[[[[ere D 20[ll File Number:2021-A-13 N I 1 Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-039 Page 9 of 13 Page 91 of 275 6.c) 6.20 p.m. DS2021-39, Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Planner re: Minor Var... -- '- 2MM LAKESHORE RD E 230 _-____��__________i e Nfl o'Q'E t ._ rsn P 1.50 1b.t9 2-77.95 22135 I z tia 5.01 7. 227. r N 227.35 227.85 ' z.3o� I PROP 227.16E -._y I 227.90 ,}zas PROD H�+� z12m A P eWY. '11�� RCARPORT ( I O k � m p � n J; 225.74_ 3-__ - owr "z I- 1.szm 226.0�0 22B.10 I 326.2P ' I . too ub.4B 4 MELLING FF:]?6.48 I II III II II, ICUCVRDECK �J ub.29 V 224.So I. .224.30 I! PROP 15�Ds 7.4 n f I. (BY 01HERS) 223e0 223..11 � dg5e Y�i� II m e i N16� I 3 � III �f�i I I ®0119 I 8i RE7WALL YY1. y law mv.ls HMN Nov LEVEL zle.n NATER Schedule 3 Applicant's Site Plan .- 7cYunLship 0 File Number 2021-A-13 Proud Heritage,Exciting Future Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-039 Page 10 of 13 Page 92 of 275 6.c) 6.20 p.m. DS2021-39, Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Planner re- Minor Var... fF6'-➢"1 II19 OF FfJ(NSG TRIYSFS _ __ _ _� �. �8'0"��-.Ill£VEFNJPM1 FRAMIX - � � o rn�,ruv x ax_.wa-/.T.nR Y ..�v'p•:vFa� '- �:.' I '. rt mcrz - - FfOflt — /�0'-P'��.UlS VEFANOA FRAMING��--- � _— — _ � -= �l�esnnee�Ecreonwxea IP'��d JU❑FLWR bl �TOP GF — — — — — — — — — ----F N WNd4Tl G '� III I I I I I I I I Rear II 7ff -------- Lf IM, r ' 0 U'�1 LL�3 VETLII�A FR4MN� II II `�-E!'-g�1 BRSE TENT FLOUR West I _— M21 — _ TII .w Ire i East Schedule 4 Applicant's Elevation Drawings Tuums6ai�,�j File Number 2021-A-18 Heritage, Proud Herita,Qe,Exciting Future Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-039 Page 11 of 13 Page 93 of 275 6.c) 6.20 p.m. DS2021-39, Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Planner re: Minor Var... f� Iaro lkidge�R°ad v 5h0(e ake `yd Lake Simcoe Schedule 5 Township Official Plan - Land Use C.*Subject Lands 0 Rural 0 T° f Shoreline Proud Heritage,Exciting Future 0 200 m File Number:2021-A-13 �/ I i I Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-039 Page 12 of 13 Page 94 of 275 6.c) 6.20 p.m. DS2021-39, Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Planner re: Minor Var... VaseyRV: eatioe.°ikri�d. SR AJRU �'Rtl9e np°a. SR �oCe Rd. Lake SR Schedule 6 Existing Zoning 'liwnshrp of 1 Subject Lands 0 SR(Shoreline Residential) Of Proid Herira�e,Exciiig,�Future 0 A/RU(Agricultural/Rural) 0 100 m File Number 2021-A-13 ti I I I 1 1 Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-039 Page 13 of 13 Page 95 of 275 6.c) 6.20 p.m. DS2021-39, Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Planner re. Minor Var... From: McCartney, Garry<gmccartney@oro-medonte.ca> Sent: Friday, March 19, 2021 3:51 PM To: Falconi,Teresa <tfalconi@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: RE: Notice of Public Hearing- Development Services Committee Meeting, April 07, 2021 (2021- A-13) Hill Building division comments are as follows, 1. Building permit review to include proximity to sewage system. Thank you, Garry McCartney, CBO Page 96 of 275 6.c) 6.20 p.m. DS2021-39, Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Planner re: Minor Var... Lake Silmcoe Region conservation authority www.LSRCA.on.ca Sent by E-mail:akaraiskakis@oro-medonte.ca March 28, 2021 File No: 2021-A-13 IMS File No.: VA-169774-081420 Andy Karaiskakis Secretary-Treasurer Township of Oro-Medonte 148 Line 7 South Oro-Medonte, ON LOL 2EO Dear Mrs. Karaiskakis: Re: Minor Variance Application 2269 Lakeshore Road Township of Oro-Medonte LSRCA staff have reviewed the above-noted Application for Minor Variance to facilitate the construction of additions to the front and rear of the existing dwelling with encroachments into the interior side yards. Documents Received and Reviewed by Staff Staff have received and reviewed the following documents submitted with this application: • Applicant's Site Plan Staff has reviewed this application as per our delegated responsibility from the Province to represent provincial interests regarding natural hazards identified in Section 3.1 of the Provincial Policy Statement(PPS, 2020) and as a regulatory authority under Ontario Regulation 179/06. The application has also been reviewed through our role as a public body under the Planning Act as per our CA Board approved policies. Site Characteristics Existing mapping indicates that the subject property is regulated due to the associated shoreline flood and erosion hazards. • The subject property is currently designated Shoreline in the Township of Oro-Medonte's Official Plan. • The subject property is currently zoned Shoreline Residential (SR)Zone. 120 Bayview Parkway T 905.895.1281 Newmarket, Ontario L3Y 3W3 F 905.853.5881 Member of Conservation Ontario Page 9 o-fF275.800.465.0437 6.c) 6.20 p.m. DS2021-39, Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Plan rMereM. axilwar... conservation authority Page 2of3 Features Life SieEeae iGegron ._wnyerva8km i1CGl', LSRCA YiaRIS['E9 d^a1.r17ar'y E.FAFP Wyfrshe0 69u4M8rY 1Lgubom 8 rkdary .'v! LAK.Ebk4G7RE 1k R891AAW man ii.a Olt LE�4.E APE 22 LA1RrF RE RQ E t�M wm.sR JJa{:I ARE N E R We V MkA4em-Unds PAOULIMM Ar 6 4is5•+4r RC'E MNRf Ewhfi�1MM—f: 2'd'J LA/rEAEK" Q r:n iiGt_Av�.5 WF�R[E . 4 MEe1F urS aumd VAe1Sl 1 i t1 Fra LA ICE 9HLYlE'+L E ... AS[esa+rNr't Nar[el I Lvl aw Cmcesskor .26 LAKF AM 4FE 7C E _ WalokootKx d llut N E-RUE �` _ W/Mr W ke kA.t k � ❑ 'k. l 4 ..,� {A[E NtlkrE;RL1 f. ,,� Pnwaae J•7{Asi.s;pR REIE a121N2q 21D ter tAKEA4 of 7p E A610RE no ?LAK Ls' RE RLIE wrKM Ji {ti[t HnNL E .r.r+�.wrr+grrr r.rs� �..rr w..�J..krr eu..k.eirrkrr..ti :] Ad fl+nOhE Kr{ ws•r.rr+w.rwr r�—�--rfrkrrrrk � r wwrrrwr+ar kwar.r+rwr r.r..rr r�wwr.kri•rIv ti.ke. AKEaH PROF eku.�rr.a.�..eec iekori �wAwrarerlr w�+`MiNrir w }1'9 LF6E qE 1<- KlerlrrrMiIWWYYMYW�kkWuArr -- �..rrt.rww. ere•rrar.r Ji�LASEAN❑ - � +�- 1trr.a�er/ilr�+ka ipfY r w SCA"1 1 A73 YvW] 62 0 41 82 Delegated Responsibility and Statutory Comments: 1. LSRCA has reviewed the application through our delegated responsibility from the Province to represent provincial interests regarding natural hazards identified in Section 3.1 of the Provincial Policy Statement (PPS). The residential use of the lot is existing.The additions to the dwelling will not constitute a new residential use or residential intensification.Therefore, the proposal is consistent with Section 3.1 of the PPS. 2. LSRCA has reviewed the application as per our responsibilities as a regulatory authority under Ontario Regulation 179/06. This regulation, made under Section 28 of the Conservation Authorities Act, enables conservation authorities to regulate development in or adjacent to river or stream valleys,Great Lakes and inland lake shorelines, watercourses, hazardous lands and wetlands. Development taking place on these lands may require permission from the conservation authority to confirm that the control of flooding, erosion, dynamic beaches, pollution or the conservation of land are not affected. LSRCA also regulates the alteration to or interference in any way with a watercourse or wetland.The site is partially within a regulated area.The proposed works (additions) appear to be within the regulated shoreline area and therefore will require a permit from LSRCA. It is understood that the permit process has already started but the permit has not yet been received. Page 98 of 275 6.c) 6.20 p.m. DS2021-39, Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Plan rMerem. mmilwar... conservation authority Page 3 of 3 Summary LSRCA is satisfied from a watershed management perspective that the application is consistent with the natural heritage and hazard policies of the PPS, and in conformity with provincial policies and the LSPP. Given the above comments, it is the opinion of the LSRCA that: 1. Consistency with Section 3.1 of the PPS has been demonstrated; 2. Ontario Regulation [179/06] applies to the subject site however a permit from LSRCA will not be required prior to any municipal approvals. On this basis, any approval of this application should be subject to the following conditions: 1. The Owner shall provide payment of$525.00 to the LSRCA as per our approved Fee Schedule for review of this Minor Variance application. 2. The Owner shall obtain a permit from LSRCA for works within the regulated area. Please advise our office of any decision made with regard to this matter. Sincerely, Shawn Filson Development Planner Page 99 of 275 6.c) 6.20 p.m. DS2021-39, Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Planner re. Minor Var... �y o � .c z 3 °+ E: y, T 4ty � o �j M Q N O N J 'S ZlGUM t O a in c U 4-0 U) Q (a Q W ry _0 U) N ca U � a) � C6 L- a) 'L— O _0 cu cu -r- � a) � O � � � 0 'a, _0 O J -C a) rn — C/) C cfl a) . . . . G N O N - C U) a O }' N O U Page 100 of 275 6.c) 6.20 p.m. DS2021-39, Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Planner re: Minor Var... c _0 0) .20 (6 a) 4-0 'O � ELO O D c) O75 o (1) 70 L7FD ~ L V! 0 L a 0 C o a) O7 Eto a) L a) O M u) a) U) T a) 4 O 0T -0cn � u) E }, � � o �O E 2 p i LO 70 CD 0) CO a) ) U _ a) U0cn tea' a) L ^ U) cn ° OR � a) a) 70 aa)) � aa)) oaa)) � tea) �' O O N E o 0 o0 00 .o n c Q� L Q �--+ O a) 0 0 0 rR d � dU- 0- E a) d .V 0) 'cn >� E a) 0 U 0 o a)_ cv cB N L LU n, Q /1 U N U) L O (II W 0 a) -0 N �- O) O C m cn a) 0T L a) L U) CU a) a) � (n co a) �' � � 0 ° }� U >, E o� c -0cv crs : U) _ L cu M m � m � � a--i ' d a) C rn O O a) > U o � �_ 70 ° � aci 2 a) � � � � � a�i Q `� cv L � _ crs a) O Q cn L -0 °C m U L O Zn Zn a) 0 .� C � Q O > a) >Aa- E a) a) O U U) (II 75 'X O a) U U O C Q+ (Q L IN _ cv C U � -o > ° a) La) T co70 a) a) N o C + = o L 00 ''' L O L a) C 0 0 � E Li a) o � O O O o }� N C — U a) •L ' U U C C '— L U O •EE 0 � � � ° � ocrscv � 0 0JE U C 0 U N o � U a) C Q- Q- o o o� � 2EM � a � � � Page 101 of 275 6.c) 6.20 p.m. DS2021-39, Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Planner re: Minor Var... -44 ,Y w �s r M' I M CM r � N 0 ca U Q N U c6 .L— cu 0" 0 0 a L Q Page 102 of 275 6.c) 6.20 p.m. DS2021-39, Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Planner re. Minor Var... o z 3 °+ E: i II I I � � n I I "Ca' N� qS I tt �' OISi co u4oG�tM��r t ,� TW NINVON" �G t,�,.,yy ML �-o, oatl h I I ICI � 1 '�IIII mrr" •_.,1 I I m s -� 6 ,.r118 p IGG �I-- F n __•_� L w N P u y FQ W Flo d 66> N I nI nll� 1{ I I ✓o M �I'° � ';� I u� I wtr; �d II II p II z � @�6m I� II 11 or✓ � � , II°F I� d 1 ........... ULU J I I I I I I I I I I in W U C6 C6 . . O a 75 U) C c� v CL CL Q Page 103 of 275 6.c) 6.20 p.m. DS2021-39, Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Planner re- Minor Var... z 3 °+ E: t6 W co 1.q'I.....---- L' cu CL O nil _ I 4 II a i� . . . . �ql j Q cu O NIf ca II \J o / O I pl II a of w ■� � � o � �' z of � � d �I S i C A V CL CL Q Page 104 of 275 6.c) 6-20 p.m. DS2021-39, Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Planner re. Minor Var... o 001-*N T IL co CL II I cu cu 4 > 0 r > U) A-0 C Page 105 of 275 6.c) 6.20 p.m. DS2021-39, Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Planner re. Minor Var... 77 o z 3 °+ E: i CM e9 � o I I j r N O N O Cu C) Q Q N CU C6 •c L a O ca c •— v J O • • CL (1) D C H J Page 106 of 275 6.c) 6.20 p.m. DS2021-39, Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Planner re- Minor Var... C- 77 1Tx 3 Yp CM 1 1 N O N O Cu CU Q- Q U C6 C6 0 O • • 0 Ncn LL ,■, Page 107 of 275 6.c) 6.20 p.m. DS2021-39, Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Planner re- Minor Var... 0 ca w O cu � �o }, o O O J M ' N O 70 N ' o 4-0 4-0 E� c6 O k .� VJ O O QL cu cu cu 70 cu G O O O -�e cu a� 0) ;. Fu Page 108 of 275 6.c) 6.20 p.m. DS2021-39, Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Planner re- Minor Var... f� n f,, CY) L c O O w 4-0 O I� O 0) M CO "� N O � N L cn ca O N O cu �r L Ur�� O O_ x t> — LL O vJ .�L _ L W C6 ® 1 r — O G O ti; � O O . I cn W L O J � Page 109 of 275 6.c) 6.20 p.m. DS2021-39, Andy Karaiskakis, Senior Planner re. Minor Var... 70 C a I � ra: cn f3 4i O _0 U) N co U O N k cu U 0— Q Q C: U) O U) u) � c6 co O " 06 CD G O L O _0 O CD O O � y W 4 f w Page 110 of 275 6.C) 6.20 p.m. DS2O2]-39, Andy K8C1 kak S, SeniorPlannerC: Minor Var 11, 20 » c Ge 7E % 0 f 7 0 ± = e Q- / 0 \ R R s § \%\ 5 lee � ¥ 2 3 \ 2 / \ a £ � \ = o E o / G $ a) g c 2 0 R \ \ ® / / ) 0 / o m \ E ° @ ® 9 E ƒ § d s ¥ q 3 \ 7 . a 2 cn o > 0) CU / / $ $ $ k k ® c E 2 / / ® / /2 � c) / % ° * § cu � k � � � 0 < k ° / 0 / /Q C.) ■ § 0 e $ f ƒ E e / f § ( % / £ e ± e q = ° E E e E 5a) m � Q- § we .2 = a \ q f \? 3 > / 3 / e s c .2 ± o 2 � ° q / $ CO CD / k / a) 2 0 \ a � ° � 2 � ® _ 2 % 2 E e 0 a ) m \ s 2 / 0 e / G 2 Co2 a) / f 2 \ ® ® 2 e = co / / _ / 0 \ 's 0 C 5 m E ® / / / ® 0 / � . k ® ) / / 2 � B ' D 9 $ q e c 2 U) 0-� > E 2 c s c - e c e E ° > n L: 0 L E oL ® > a e e / % ± 0 -0 / U -i \ \ $ CU � CL % ƒ % e 0 f F 5 f ) '0 R $ . *= y 0 e a E n m E o m / ƒ CD4 2 ± \ 0 * 7 £ / 0 s % E ƒ 2mf ) = _ / \ nE > 2 Ea / G/ o [ ® f 0 � S O CL $ 1CU @f � CL \ \ ) / 2 /_ CL 3 o e ƒ ® \ 2 £ U c \ / ± .2a) 2 / a �$ 0 / c 0)-0 o f / 0 k G f \ ) 2 3 0 2 ' c c o o = % \ s ± § G \ % ± f O E 2 N m / 0 9 2 R e 2 7 0 E f % � � \ / a) 0 / e ) 2 c / < �% / > 0 w 0 2 g e 7 n k � ' 2 *\ % § cu a •- e o ° n e F 0- 0 ° a- & o g $ \ _j n \ 70 / M . . / \ E7n0 / / / § / / ƒ / / Wit - - - ƒ k 0 ^ © 3 a 3 -0 \ � k 2 a) \ % £ % ) / / § / / ƒ/ % / �/ �/ \ / u / EE \ \ - k a) a) \ § / / % t / k a) & 6 4 � / Page ]]] 0 275 6.d) 6.30 p.m. DS2021-40, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re: Min... 1 ownship o f Report 0 Proud Heritruge, Exciting Feature Report No. To: Prepared By: DS2021-040 Development Services Catherine McLean Committee Intermediate Planner Meeting Date: Subject: Motion # April 7, 2021 Minor Variance Application 2021-A-15 Roll #: Tero Malcolm and Patricia R.M.S. File #: 4346-020-010-05558 Buell-Malcolm D13 59168 5 Pine Springs Road Recommendation(s): Requires Action For Information Only It is recommended: 1 . That Report No. DS2021-040 be received and adopted. 2. That Minor Variance Application 2021-A-15 by Tero Malcolm and Patricia Buell- Malcolm specifically for permission to build an addition to the existing single detached dwelling with a reduced setback of 3.1 metres (10.2 feet) from the front lot line, a reduced setback of 1.5 metres (4.9 feet) from the interior side lot line, a reduced interior side yard setback for the driveway accessing the single detached dwelling of 0.46 metres (1.5 feet) and a reduced length of the parking spaces on the driveway of 3.1 metres (10.2 feet) on lands municipally known as 5 Pine Springs Road, Township of Oro-Medonte, be approved subject to the conditions as outlined in Report DS2021-040. 3. The conditions are as follows: a) That notwithstanding Table B1 , Section 5.20.2.3 and Section 5.20.1.1 , the proposed single detached dwelling addition shall otherwise comply with all other applicable provisions of the Zoning By-law; b) That the proposed single detached dwelling addition be substantially and proportionally in conformity with the dimensions as set out on the application and sketches submitted and approved by the Committee; c) That an Ontario Land Surveyor verify by pinning the foundation wall and verifying in writing by way of survey/real property report, prior to the pouring of the footing and if no footing, the foundation, that the single detached dwelling addition is located no closer than 3.1 metres from the front lot line and no closer than 1 .5 metres from the interior side lot line; and, d) That the appropriate Zoning Certificate, Engineered Lot Grading Plan and Building Permit be obtained from the Township only after the Committee's Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-040 Page 1 of 11 Page 112 of 275 6.d) 6.30 p.m. DS2021-40, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re: Min... decision becomes final and binding, as provided for within the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P. 13. 4. And that the applicant be advised of the Development Services Committee's decision under the Secretary-Treasurer's signature. Background: The subject property has a lot area of 0.19 hectares (0.46 acres) and contains a single detached dwelling. The location map is included as Schedule 1 to this report and an aerial photo is included as Schedule 2. The applicants are proposing to build an addition to the existing single detached dwelling. The applicants are seeking relief to the following sections of Zoning By-law 97-95: Table B1 — Minimum Required Front Yard Required. Proposed: 7.5 metres 24.6 feet 13.1 metres 10.2 feet Table B1 — Minimum Required Interior Side Yard Required. Proposed: 2.5 metres 8.2 feet T1 .5 metres 4.9 feet Section 5.20.2.3 — Minimum interior side yard setback for a driveway accessing a single detached dwelling Required: Proposed: 3.0 metres 9.8 feet 0.46 metres 1 .5 feet Section 5.20.1 .1 — Size of required parking spaces Required: Proposed: Width: 3.0 metres (9.8 feet) Width: 3.0 metres (9.8 feet) Length: 6.0 metres (19.7 feet) Length: 3.1 metres (10.2 feet) The applicants' site plan and elevation drawings are included as Schedules 3 and 4 to this report. Analysis: Provincial Policies Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) 2020 The Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) provides policy direction on matters of Provincial interest related to land use planning and development. Section 1 .1 .3 — Settlement Areas is applicable to this application. Specifically, Section 1.1.3.1 speaks to settlement areas being the focus of growth and development. The subject lands are located within Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-040 Page 2 of 11 Page 113 of 275 6.d) 6.30 p.m. DS2021-40, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re: Min... the Horseshoe Valley settlement area; therefore, Planning Staff is of the opinion that this application is consistent with the Settlement Areas policies of the PPS. A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2020) The Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe provides a long-term plan to manage growth and protect the natural environment. Section 2.2.1 Managing Growth is applicable to this application and states that settlement areas should be the focus of growth. This section has been reviewed and Planning Staff are of the opinion that the proposed single detached dwelling addition conforms to the policies in the Growth Plan as the lands subject to this application are already within an established residential settlement area. County Official Plan The property is designated Settlements in Simcoe County's Official Plan. The Settlements designation is the focus of population growth and seeks to develop a compact urban form that promotes the efficient use of land. In Planning Staff's opinion, the proposed single detached dwelling addition is consistent with the County's Official Plan as it is an addition to the existing permitted residential use. Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13 Section 3(5) of the Planning Act states that all decisions in respect of the exercise of any authority that affects a planning matter shall be consistent with provincial policy statements and shall conform with or shall not conflict with the provincial plans that are in effect on the date of the decision. Section 45(1) of the Planning Act establishes a four-fold test for a minor variance which requires consideration of: (1) whether the variance is minor; (2) whether the variance is desirable for the appropriate development or use of the land, building or structure; (3) whether the general purpose and intent of the zoning by-law is maintained; and (4) whether the general purpose and intent of the Official Plan is maintained. A variance must meet all four of these tests. Planning Staff has reviewed this application against these four tests as follows: Do the variances conform to the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan? The subject lands are located in the Rural Settlement Area of Horseshoe Valley and are designated Low Density Residential in accordance with Schedule D — Horseshoe Valley, which forms part of the Township's Official Plan. Permitted uses within the Low Density Residential designation include single detached dwellings. Therefore, the requested variances pertaining to the construction of an addition to the existing residential use is considered to conform to the Township's Official Plan. Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-040 Page 3 of 11 Page 114 of 275 6.d) 6.30 p.m. DS2021-40, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re: Min... Do the variances conform to the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law? The subject property is zoned Residential One Exception 63 (R1*63) in the Township's Zoning By-law 97-95. Exception 63 references a change to the exterior side yard setback, which is not relevant for this property. The applicants are proposing to build an addition to their existing single detached dwelling and are requesting relief from the Zoning By-law to: • Reduce the minimum required front yard setback from 7.5 metres (24.6 feet) to 3.1 metres (10.2 feet); • Reduce the minimum required interior side yard setback from 2.5 metres (8.2 feet) to 1.5 metres (4.9 feet); • Legalize the existing reduced interior side yard setback for a driveway accessing a single detached dwelling from 3.0 metres (9.8 feet) to 0.46 metres (1.5 feet); and, • Reduce the minimum length of the two driveway parking spaces from 6.0 metres (19.7 feet) to 3.1 metres (10.2 feet). The Zoning By-law's requirement for a minimum front yard setback of 7.5 metres serves to achieve relatively large landscaped front yards which contribute to the low-density residential character of the area, as well as to ensure there is adequate space in which to provide off-street parking spaces on private property in front of dwellings and garages. The proposed front yard setback of 3.1 metres (9.8 feet) means that the applicants also required a variance for the reduced minimum length of the driveway parking spaces which are located in front of the proposed attached two car garage. Planning Staff discussed the reduced parking space sizes with the owners who indicated that the purpose of building the attached garage is to park the vehicles inside the garage rather than in the driveway and the camper that is currently in the driveway will be stored off site. Planning Staff also discussed the reduced front yard setback and the reduced parking space sizes with Operations Staff who conducted a site visit and determined that they have no concerns with the proposed variances as the distance between the edge of the pavement in the cul-de-sac and the property line is very large, as illustrated on Schedule 3 to this report. The Zoning By-law's requirement for a minimum interior side yard setback of 2.5 metres (8.2 feet) in the R1 Zone is intended to provide spatial separation between residential properties, as well as provide space for access and maintenance around buildings and structures. The applicants are proposing an interior side yard of 1 .5 metres (4.9 feet) which, in Planning Staff's opinion, is adequate space for maintenance and access around the dwelling as it maintains spatial separation between the subject lands and the neighbouring property. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the owners will be required to prepare an engineered lot grading plan, subject to municipal approval. The plan will ensure that water drainage resulting from the proposed addition will be mitigated on the subject lands and will not impact neighbouring lots. As per Section 5.20.2.3 of the Township's Zoning By-law, the minimum required interior side yard setback for a driveway accessing a single detached dwelling is 3.0 metres (9.8 feet). The purpose of this setback is to ensure that there is adequate space for the management of driveway drainage and winter snow storage without negatively Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-040 Page 4 of 11 Page 115 of 275 6.d) 6.30 p.m. DS2021-40, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re: Min... impacting the neighbouring property. The location of the existing driveway will not be changing as a result of the minor variance application. The applicants are simply seeking to legalize the existing non-complying setback of 0.46 metres (1.5 feet). For the reasons outlined above, Planning Staff is of the opinion that the proposed variances meet the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law. Are the variances desirable for the appropriate development of the lot? Upon site visit, Planning Staff noted that the location of the addition in front of the existing dwelling is the only suitable location on the property due to the topography of the lands with the steep slope immediately behind the dwelling. Letters of support were received from the neighbours located at 3, 7 and 10 Pine Springs Road, which includes the neighbour immediately to the south where the applicant is proposing to encroach into the required interior side yard setback. For these reasons, Planning Staff are of the opinion that the proposed variances are considered desirable development of the lot. Are the variances minor? The question of the minor nature of the variances relates to their scale and impact. In Planning Staff's opinion, the requested Minor Variances are minor in nature as the proposed addition is not anticipated to have an adverse impact on the character and appearance of the neighbourhood. As the proposed variances are considered to conform to the general intent of the Official Plan, to meet the general intent of the Zoning By-law, to be appropriate for the desirable development of the lot, and are not anticipated to have an adverse effect on the character of the surrounding area, the variances are considered to be minor. Financial / Legal Implications / Risk Management: Potential financial and legal implications should the decision of the Committee be appealed to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT) and Council chooses to defend the Committee's decision. Policies/Legislation: • Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13 • Provincial Policy Statement, 2020 • A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, 2020 • County of Simcoe Official Plan • Township of Oro-Medonte Official Plan • Township of Oro-Medonte Zoning By-law No. 97-95, as amended Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-040 Page 5 of 11 Page 116 of 275 6.d) 6.30 p.m. DS2021-40, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re: Min... Corporate Strategic Goals: In 2016, Council adopted the Township's Strategic Plan. The following Goals of the Plan are relevant to this application: Balanced Growth: • Ensure land use planning policies manage change and promote economic activity that does not negatively impact the Township's natural heritage features and attributes. Staff are of the opinion that the proposed development will not negatively impact the Township's natural features and attributes and is consistent with the Strategic Plan. Consultations: Notice of this application was circulated to the public and to various review agencies and Township departments. A Public notice sign was also posted on the subject lands. Letters of support were received from the neighbours located at 3, 7 and 10 Pine Springs Road. As of the preparation of this report, the following comments have been received from Township Departments: • Township Infrastructure and Capital Projects — I looked at that in the field and do not have concerns with it. The distance between the EOP and property line is very large. Attachments: Schedule 1: Location Map Schedule 2: Aerial Photo Schedule 3: Applicant's Site Plan Schedule 4: Elevation Drawings Conclusion: Planning Staff recommends that Minor Variance Application 2021-A-15 be approved, specifically to permit construction of an addition to the existing single detached dwelling with a reduced setback of 3.1 metres (10.2 feet) from the front lot line, a reduced setback of 1 .5 metres (4.9 feet) from the interior side lot line, a reduced interior side yard setback for the driveway accessing the single detached dwelling of 0.46 metres (1.5 feet) and a reduced length of the driveway parking spaces of 3.1 metres (10.2 feet) on the basis that the application meets the four tests of the Planning Act and conforms to or is consistent with applicable Provincial, County and Township planning policies. Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-040 Page 6 of 11 Page 117 of 275 6.d) 6.30 p.m. DS2021-40, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re: Min... Respectfully submitted: Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner Approvals: Date: Derek Witlib, Manager Planning Services March 31, 2021 Andria Leigh, Director Development Services March 31, 2021 Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-040 Page 7 of 11 Page 118 of 275 6.d) 6.30 p.m. DS2021-40, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re: Min... Schedule 1: Location Map �vatirrRd.— 13 28 •Ra_ 12 10 11 26 9 6 10 HarsoslioYa 11 yRd.� 24 12 - 8 nld.ea.r�e.Rd. 22 - a s 4 20 11 2 �'/)e point 1 9 7 2 7 5 3 5 4 14 3 0 O 6 a 1 12 1 m 10 3 10 6 12 4 7 g 2 22 Horseshoe Valley Rd.W. 1 3 37 11 9 7 5 32 1101 35 7 a►e Ct. 5 s 33 C 9 W 1 +�. 3 31 28 1 11 29 26 13 27 24 Schedule 1 Location Tawrtrhip of 51 ®Subject Lands Proud Heritage,Exciting Future 0 100 m File Number,2021-R-15 N I i i i I Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-040 Page 8 of 11 Page 119 of 275 6.d) 6.30 p.m. DS2021-40, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re, Min... Schedule 2: Aerial Photo ��rna n WnA•Rd. n san�P�•v.n�r rte. i N.eame.�xd.. Nr Schedule 2 Aerial Photo Tawrtrhip of Q Subject Lands Proud Heritage,Exciting Future 0 25 m File Number,2021-A-15 N I Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-040 Page 9 of 11 Page 120 of 275 6.d) 6.30 p.m. DS2021-40, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re: Min... Schedule 3: Applicants' Site Plan FA�F QQJ 011, EXISTING DRIVEWAY I \I EXISTING <' DRIVEWAY CLE I -- -- " co E o Mi 5 EXISTING DECK �u PROPOSEDS B-sT�f2E . ADDITION OVE ;GARAGE & REAR EX.ISTINQ : T. EXISTING IN STOREY -DWI STOREY D ELLING (HATCHED ----------- I i.7 Til + l -- EXISTING DEC l a I EXISTING SEPTIC TANK BELOW + ~ APPROX. TOP OF SLQPE i I I Y l I 1 I I ` Schedule 3 1 Applicant's Site Plan V u+A'r�l I File Number 2021-A-15 f'raaid Heritage ExiiPinq Future Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-040 Page 10 of 11 Page 121 of 275 6.d) 6.30 p.m. DS2021-40, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re: Min... Schedule 4: Elevation Drawings -- I PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION a D SIDE ELEVATION Schedule 4 Applicant's Elevation Drawings 01 09UrZl'�!/ File Number 2021-A-15 Proud Heritage,Exciting Future Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-040 Page 11 of 11 Page 122 of 275 6.d) 6.30 p.m. DS2021-40, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re: Min... From: Metras,Justin <jmetras@oro-medonte.ca> Sent: Friday, March 19, 2021 9:47 AM To: Falconi,Teresa <tfalconi@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Re: Notice of Public Hearing - Development Services Committee Meeting, April 07, 2021 (2021- A-15) Malcolm Teresa Operations has no objections to this application. Regards Justin Page 123 of 275 6.d) 6.30 p.m. DS2021-40, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re: Min... From: Metras,Justin Sent: March 25, 2021 1:21 PM To: McLean, Catherine<cmclean(@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: RE: Minor Variance 2021-A-15 (Malcolm) Catherine I looked at that in the field and do not have concerns with it. The distance between the EOP and property line is very large. Justin Justin Metras Manager, Infrastructure and Capital Projects Township of Oro-Medonte Page 124 of 275 6.d) 6.30 p.m. DS2021-40, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re: Min... 4a� � 5 �- Ca the dta�e`c® w a z a 3 � E: `u 5P�1n9 C c�� G �1 agp Q 4 � T m y Country N " N � J O aanoJQ y3. -d o N '1�lsalaa�dey�� 'n O U (D � .— � C: Q O a) M U a) X U W C: U) � � ca Cu C � � L '� O a) a) Cu U) cD a) C: O a) a) O 0 . . . . •C: LO a) 75; a O • • -� - ++ ++ � M .� CO a) V 'a i N O Page 125 of 275 6.d) 6.30 p.m. DS2021-40, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re: Min... 0 o y U) cn 3 a � o O � p • C) � cu 0) O s 70 L� O O 70 a) r U I � Q (6 O m r }' 0) N o Cu O — T 0 N 'Z3 .a� U) T) a) N O O U a CR O --� a) a) rn a) Cu u) a) N a) Cu C ) CA a) V a) Q to � a -0a � � � � C� O avi v�i o (n a) u°)i CO Q i N 70 Q E Q E � QCO Q- 0) U § C 0 '.- O � Cu O O > N C O d - d 0 a 0_ > J L -0 (D _0 a) U E M V (U _ Q 0) +� _ E V J L a) Cu (� cL70 U .O Q LO Cu •— rn a) O V/ L a OL I` N a) a) rn L L E a) a) V O O a) aa)) aa)) o Q' Q' E N U E a E a) a) cT °' (n . . � M N C`7 00 � �. a) W N 00 N CA a) E O O E O I a) 170 a) N 70 a) N 7 (D ._ N N L m71 m E 0 � E o 7 8) O � aLO � a� 0aa)) o 0Q)) >�> m Page 126 of 275 6.d) 6.30 p.m. DS2021-40, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re: Min... P�ne,SPfin9 e � w 3 °+ O _U C6 Q N O N O Cu U Q N U C6 .L— cu O • • o a L Q Page 127 of 275 6.d) 6.30 p.m. DS2021-40, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re: Min... LLJ Z x UJ w U? �# � w to IO p Uw> Q r Z to O w p Z� xi Zm a d G i d C J w L--' �Y Q -o Z W wH l [WL'l] L z 0 aP I .s-,s 09 w LLJ a<Er � O Q X ( I N � O � N � O Cu U Q- Q N U Cu . . Cu r. M > a O '— .— cn c� v CL CL Q Page 128 of 275 6.d) 6-30 p.m. IDS2021-40, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re, Min ------------ I IIIIIL 1 -7177 77 LIM I Li O oZ Lu LD co a- a- Lu O U Cu • 0 Cu Lu Q i_ LU Page 129 of 275 6.d) 6.30 p.m. DS2021-40, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re: Min... �\ _0 O Q C6 Cu Cu � _ O � Z Q N O N O II►��ifi��.�� 70 O - 0) 0) 4-0 C/) .X W Page 130 of 275 6.d) 6.30 p.m. DS2021-40, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re: Min... f _ Y 0) -0 za cu � o � C , . Q- U) Q o o N O N O Cu k f rn V/ r ' F U/ Cu CuCU 0 0 4-0 75 0) Page 131 of 275 6.d) 6.30 p.m. DS2021-40, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re: Min... o z 3 � E: ca 0 4-0 2r f CD Cu O t Q- cu 4-0 Qfi ' Q 75 0 Page 132 of 275 6.d) 6.30 p.m. DS2021-40, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re: Min... O N O O) 70 O 7 X O 'i c6 N 0) >, 4 70 = c6 cu N 70 > 70 � J 70 i O O +� U) N Q U N s ' n a 0 U) O N O Cu 70 �y CO � W W U � -a U Cu CO CO Q Cu o 0) i 1 L 7 C) Q O _ 0 70 70 U O Q O Page 133 of 275 6.d) 6.30 p.m. DS2021-40, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re: Min... R w Q U N C ca O f'o Y z_ �\ (II (II N N Q ) c i U Q N � � � � � C O QO NM C" N (Q N (B O O Cu - _OU a) O O a) n Fu + O aU iCOn U _ a) � 7o O Oa) •S � CO 0) 2 ON O = _r_ a) o) =3 CD •� O U) a) � � c C O Cn Cu cn N � E O N C 4 —2 a) QO Ca) � U E Co Co :%: a) o Cu O +�ca C C a) CQ a) L a) a) O a) (� •- +' 0 L '� QO Cca +Jd a) N � i 0 a) a) O O — N E 0) � c � .L Mn L a) o) a) O C �' a) Y Mn 0- O :+ C � 4 NO ,~ U O QE4�— Mn O O c(II . — — > Q QO NL � m N Zn Nma) o MQ NMn Q B a) (B m �' ca N Cv a) O Q� O CQ -0 CII C C 0- > � 0 :U � � tn (V .� � � � � cv0) ,L CA O LO C co a) C C Q }+ d M L - 0 a) Co � tOn Cu O Y Q U N Q O) o t� Cn UC a) cB � C +, C O a) U O C C O CQ H o CO C aC) aa) Q O Oa) a) _0M n ca a) C a > -o C a) Mya) . n � a) Cu a) O _0f O Q -aNa) .�a) . O w Q n, ��LC — Cu a)U i 07 " O Oa) N� ) > i S �y�^ L U N L Q U N O M� ^^ L >% Q 0 O O `v O a) O •L O —0 -0 O > O�� •Cn _0 •(�� C C Q — O C � C a) 'C U a) C? U U C �It '� N U C Q E a) a) Cu ■O N Q a) O Cn LM) O O Q J L � -0 O Q a) Cu Q Mn ca Q +-. M Q' O N a) a) ^aL. m MQ N E co)- a) � O C Cu 0 C a) E C a) OU LO L Q O U .� o � NM (Do N � � aQio � CLmma)Cu 0 Q AA++ C O C Cu W z ; C: O Y O 0 C C Cu L NQ � L '--� Mn � > a a) O a--� O U a i m o CXmoCu � �c = a) = a) o2 �.70 Q � a) a) N 0) Q N O H O H Cn H C H Cu Cu U CO }' LC? a) � N a) Mrs L> (n C V o 0 Eo Q a) .N Page 134 of 275 6.e) 6.40 p.m. DS2021-43, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re: Min... 1 ownship o f Report 0 Proud Heritruge, Exciting Feature Report No. To: Prepared By: DS2021-043 Development Services Catherine McLean Committee Intermediate Planner Meeting Date: Subject: Motion # April 7, 2021 Minor Variance Application 2021-A-16 Roll #: Jill and Scott Strachan R.M.S. File #: 4346-010-004-08514 10 Greenshields Crescent D13 59204 Recommendation(s): Requires Action For Information Only It is recommended: 1 . That Report No. DS2021-043 be received and adopted. 2. That Minor Variance Application 2021-A-16 by Jill and Scott Strachan specifically for permission to build a detached accessory building with an increased floor area of 135.0 square metres (1,453.2 square feet) and an increased height of 6.3 metres (20.7 feet) on lands municipally known as 10 Greenshields Crescent, Township of Oro-Medonte, be approved subject to the conditions as outlined in Report DS2021-043. 3. The conditions are as follows: a) That notwithstanding Section 5.1.4 and Section 5.1 .6, the proposed detached accessory building shall otherwise comply with all other applicable provisions of the Zoning By-law; b) That the proposed detached accessory building be substantially and proportionally in conformity with the dimensions as set out on the application and sketches submitted and approved by the Committee; c) That the proposed detached accessory building shall not be used for human habitation, commercial purposes or for a home industry; d) That the applicants maintain and preserve the existing vegetative buffer on the interior property lines, or replaced with a similar vegetative buffer if destroyed; and, e) That the appropriate Zoning Certificate, Engineered Lot Grading Plan and Building Permit be obtained from the Township only after the Committee's decision becomes final and binding, as provided for within the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P. 13. 4. And that the applicants be advised of the Development Services Committee's decision under the Secretary-Treasurer's signature. Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-043 Page 1 of 10 Page 135 of 275 6.e) 6.40 p.m. DS2021-43, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re: Min... Background: The subject property has a lot area of 0.49 hectares (1.22 acres) and contains a 140.1 square metres (1,508 square feet) single detached dwelling and 9.3 square metres (100.0 square feet) shed. The location map is included as Schedule 1 to this report and an aerial photo is included as Schedule 2. The applicants are proposing to build a detached accessory building and are seeking relief to the following sections of Zoning By-law 97-95: Section 5.1.4 — Maximum Height Required. Proposed: 4.5 metres (14.7 feet) T6.3 metres (20.7 feet) Section 5.1 .6 — Maximum Floor Area Required. Proposed: 70.0 square metres (753.5 square feet) T1 35.0 square metres (1 ,453.2 square feet) The applicants' site plan and elevation drawings are included as Schedules 3 and 4 to this report. Analysis: Provincial Policies Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) 2020 The Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) provides policy direction on matters of Provincial interest related to land use planning and development. Specifically, Section 1 .1 .4 — Rural Areas is applicable to this application. Specifically Section 1 .1.4.2 states that rural settlement areas shall be the focus of growth and development. The subject lands are located within an existing rural residential plan of subdivision and Planning Staff is of the opinion that the proposed accessory building is consistent with Rural Areas policies of the PPS. A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2020) The Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe provides a long-term plan to manage growth and protect the natural environment. Section 2.2.9 Rural Areas is applicable to this application. This section has been reviewed and Planning Staff is of the opinion that the proposed detached accessory building is consistent with the Rural Areas policies in the Growth Plan as the lands subject to this application are already within an established rural residential plan of subdivision. Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-043 Page 2 of 10 Page 136 of 275 6.e) 6.40 p.m. DS2021-43, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re: Min... County Official Plan The property is designated Rural in Simcoe County's Official Plan. The Rural Designation permits limited residential development. In Planning Staff's opinion, the proposed development is consistent with the County's Official Plan as the proposed detached accessory building is accessory to the permitted residential use. Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13 Section 3(5) of the Planning Act states that all decisions in respect of the exercise of any authority that affects a planning matter shall be consistent with provincial policy statements and shall conform with or shall not conflict with the provincial plans that are in effect on the date of the decision. Section 45(1) of the Planning Act establishes a four-fold test for a minor variance which requires consideration of: (1) whether the variance is minor; (2) whether the variance is desirable for the appropriate development or use of the land, building or structure; (3) whether the general purpose and intent of the zoning by-law is maintained; and (4) whether the general purpose and intent of the Official Plan is maintained. A variance must meet all four of these tests. Planning Staff has reviewed this application against these four tests as follows: Do the variances conform to the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan? The subject lands are designated Rural Residential in the Township's Official Plan. The intent of the Rural Residential Designation is: • To recognize existing estate, country estate and chalet residential developments in the Township. Permitted uses in the Rural Residential designation include single detached dwellings and by extension accessory uses, such as detached garages. The proposed variances conform to the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan as the applicants are proposing to build a detached accessory building, which is accessory to a permitted residential use in the Rural Residential Designation. Do the variances conform to the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law? The subject property is zoned Rural Residential One (RUR1) in the Township's Zoning By-law 97-95. According to the Township's Zoning By-law, a detached accessory building is permitted pursuant to Section 5.1 . The applicants have requested relief from the Zoning By-law to permit the construction of a detached accessory building in the RUR1 Zone with an increased maximum floor area and an increased maximum height to fit their fifth wheel camper on one side and on the other side, to fit their truck, lawn mower and snowmobiles. Detached accessory buildings are subject to maximum size restrictions to ensure that such structures remain secondary and subordinate, in both their appearance and use, Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-043 Page 3 of 10 Page 137 of 275 6.e) 6.40 p.m. DS2021-43, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re: Min... to the main residential use of the lot; and to prevent over-development that would detract from the character of the area. The applicants are proposing to build a one storey detached accessory building with a floor area of 135.0 square metres (1 ,453.2 square feet). The height of a detached accessory building is measured from average grade to mid-roof. The applicants have requested an increase in height from 4.5 metres (14.8 feet) to 6.3 metres (20.7 feet). The proposed detached accessory building is slightly smaller than the existing single detached dwelling which is approximately 140.1 square metres (1,508.0 square feet) according to the MPAC records. Despite the small difference in size, the location of the proposed accessory building behind the dwelling and the use of the building for storage will help ensure that the accessory building will remain secondary and subordinate to the primary residential use. Based on the above, Planning Staff is satisfied that the proposed detached accessory building would conform to the general purpose and intent of the Zoning By-law. Are the variances desirable for the appropriate development of the lot? Planning Staff considered the proposed application within the context of the surrounding properties and the established character and built form of the neighbourhood. Upon site visit, Planning Staff noted that the proposed detached accessory building will have a minimal impact on the surrounding neighbours, as the accessory building will be located 40.8 metres (133.9 feet) from the north lot line, 14.9 metres (48.9 feet) from the south lot line and 20.1 metres (65.9 feet) from the east lot line. The property is buffered by large, mature vegetation along the north and south property lines. Furthermore, the proposed accessory building will be located at the rear of the lot; therefore, it will have a minimal impact from the road and will be well screened from surrounding properties. Due to the fact that the proposed accessory building is located behind the dwelling and is screened from view from the neighbouring properties, Planning Staff believe that it is appropriate within this context. A similar structure may not be supportable on every property within this neighbourhood depending on size, location and screening from view. Planning Staff recommended that as a condition of the minor variance the applicants maintain and preserve the existing vegetative buffer on the interior property lines, or replace with a similar vegetative buffer if destroyed to ensure that the building remain screened from view from the neighbouring properties. Planning Staff noted that another property in this subdivision obtained a variance for a detached accessory building with an increased floor area. Specifically, the owners at 7 Jermey Lane obtained a variance for an increased floor area of 189.0 square metres (2,034.4 square feet) for their detached accessory building (Minor Variance 2016-A-11). For these reasons, Planning Staff are of the opinion that the proposed variances are considered desirable development of the lot. Are the variances minor? The question of the minor nature of the variances relates to their scale and impact. In Planning Staff's opinion, the requested Minor Variances are minor in nature as the Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-043 Page 4 of 10 Page 138 of 275 6.e) 6.40 p.m. DS2021-43, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re: Min... proposed detached accessory building is not anticipated to have any adverse impacts on the neighbouring properties as mature vegetation on and around the property will screen the proposed detached accessory building and it will not detract from the residential character of the neighbourhood. As the proposed variances are considered to conform to the general intent of the Official Plan, to meet the general intent of the Zoning By-law, to be appropriate for the desirable development of the lot, and are not anticipated to have an adverse effect on the character of the surrounding area, the variances are considered to be minor. Financial / Legal Implications / Risk Management: Potential financial and legal implications should the decision of the Committee be appealed to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT) and Council chooses to defend the Committee's decision. Policies/Legislation: • Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13 • Provincial Policy Statement, 2020 • A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, 2020 • County of Simcoe Official Plan • Township of Oro-Medonte Official Plan • Township of Oro-Medonte Zoning By-law No. 97-95, as amended Corporate Strategic Goals: In 2016, Council adopted the Township's Strategic Plan. The following Goals of the Plan are relevant to this application: Balanced Growth: • Ensure land use planning policies manage change and promote economic activity that does not negatively impact the Township's natural heritage features and attributes. Staff are of the opinion that the proposed development will not negatively impact the Township's natural features and attributes, and is consistent with the Strategic Plan. Consultations: Notice of this application was circulated to the public and to various review agencies and Township departments. A Public notice sign was also posted on the subject lands. As of the preparation of this report, the following comments have been received: Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-043 Page 5 of 10 Page 139 of 275 6.e) 6.40 p.m. DS2021-43, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re: Min... • Township Infrastructure and Capital Projects — No objections. Attachments: Schedule 1: Location Map Schedule 2: Aerial Photo Schedule 3: Applicant's Site Plan Schedule 4: Elevation Drawings Conclusion: Planning Staff recommends that Minor Variance Application 2021-A-16 be approved, specifically to permit construction of a detached accessory building with an increased floor area of 135.0 square metres (1,453.2 square feet) and an increased height of 6.3 metres (20.7 feet) on the basis that the application meets the four tests of the Planning Act and conforms to or is consistent with applicable Provincial, County and Township planning policies. Respectfully submitted: Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner Approvals: Date: Derek Witlib, Manager Planning Services April 1, 2021 Andria Leigh, Director Development Services April 1, 2021 Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-043 Page 6 of 10 Page 140 of 275 6.e) 6.40 p.m. DS2021-43, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re, Min... Schedule 1: Location Map Yes Jna,T 22 4 i- �� 1090 1108 1130 na�a9Fo vain rlae.. 2 i 1024 d�a ON RM 1 4 8 8 10 12 2 4 6 Jermey Ln.. N 3 5 7 9 2 1 U 1115 a S 4 3 15 N 10 8 6 Nevis Ridge Dr, Greer 10 16 14 14 11 9 7 8 12 1384 1331 Schedule 1 Location Tawrtrhi- of Subject Lands Proud Heritage,Exciting Future 0 200 m File Number,2021-A-16 I i i i Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-043 Page 7 of 10 Page 141 of 275 6.e) 6.40 p.m. DS2021-43, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re, Min... Schedule 2: Aerial Photo on Wn•Rd. nan<san�P�•v.n Ir rta. - L�. fff eri v U IA 9 G1 N C a r..F Schedule 2 Aerial Photo Tawrtrhip of Q Subject Lands Proud Heritage,Exciting Future 0 30 m File Number,2021-A-16 N I t i 1 Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-043 Page 8 of 10 Page 142 of 275 6.e) 6.40 p.m. DS2021-43, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re: Min... Schedule 3: Applicants' Site Plan o � _ © (Dz `" zwx i= ❑ g � ¢ o J w C? ri J ❑ w J J_ w o zJ w � w _j waow ¢ � w 7 z Vi ¢ JU � w � w rn w w Schedule 3 Applicant's Site Plan V�u1A'r�/�tJ/" File Number 2021-A-16 Proud Heritage,Eaiitir g Future Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-043 Page 9 of 10 Page 143 of 275 6.e) 6.40 p.m. DS2021-43, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re: Min... Schedule 4: Elevation Drawings I I I 1777 I I I I _ _ I I I I I n I � I I n � I , o i I m _ I � I I � I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - I I! II III,:' I I .I I I it it I it it I , - g it i '9 I __ it G III I it � I I I I ! I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I i I I I I I :I Schedule 4 Applicant's Elevation Drawings 0 09UrZl1 !/ File Number 2021-A-16 Proud Heritage,Exciting Future Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-043 Page 10 of 10 Page 144 of 275 6.e) 6.40 p.m. DS2021-43, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re: Min... From: Metras,Justin <jmetras@oro-medonte.ca> Sent: Friday, March 19, 2021 11:40 AM To: Falconi,Teresa <tfalconi@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Re: Notice of Public Hearing - Development Services Committee Meeting, April 07, 2021 (2021- A-16) Strachan Teresa Operations has no objections to this application. Justin Page 145 of 275 6.e) 6.40 p.m. DS2021-43, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re: Min... m 'N(T aull N 0[aui— ?c o x z Cu W U c 9 � O r n�� v/ N N J O � M 7 9 N - a a 'M 6 aui1 •N 6 aui� 'n O r 8 Ti -1--j Cu U }' Q U (D (� Q U � N U O a) U _0 ca Cu � 1 0 CO •— � ca N Page 146 of 275 6.e) 6.40 p.m. DS2021-43, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re: Min... ti CO z a C6 � � U U) 00 (D 0) U) Cu-0 IN N aD 122 QD o i -5 Q O O U) 0 N (6 N V) N O 0 0 122 CD O }' — 0) — Cu a� � �, .V O Q (D Qo a--r CO 0 O Cfl CO � T U Cu O (D 0) C: C: � a� �_ U , � Q Cu '� •— 0 0 0- ato 2 OE ELO O (6 E E O _0 . . W ~ 42 � aD _0 E U) Irl. . . c-- O 0) � ' 0 C6 o f o U a0 (D (D W oCu CO CO r- Page 147 of 275 6.e) 6.40 p.m. DS2021-43, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re: Min... z � 3 °+ E: Cu IZ- C6 Cn CD Q N -sajo sp�aiysuaa�� O N O Cu U Q N U Cu .L— Cu O • • � o a L Q Page 148 of 275 6.e) 6.40 p.m. DS2021-43, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re: Min... o W 2= k �Zm w Z W x LO J W 3 °+ ❑ E: Cu W J J_ ❑ U LU 0 W OLL. J Cu ?W J-T L7 }mo w mW Ixw cn F W >= �aZ rv/J> u)�w<-10 QD J ' w Q 0 H (A d' ' �H �W N O N ' O Cu U Q N U Cu . . � ca Cu a O v CL CL Q Page 149 of 275 6.e) 6.40 p.m. DS2021-43, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re: Min... jzc 4) 3 °+ Cu E: +� I ii F I '- NI � ---- � •— , si ii � u U III is - -— i i I Ili �I I U)75 E �i V CL ii Q Page 150 of 275 6.e) 6.40 p.m. DS2021-43, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re: Min... • Y _0IZ— w cu I+ Cu _ - 0 �f s �t k 0) ?; W _ N O N O 4-0 Cu 0) r U U C/) CU ' .. • a) a U) a) O T Page 151 of 275 6.e) 6.40 p.m. DS2021-43, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re: Min... _ r o x cu cu cu 9 fTMs G � Z O N O Uk vi C6 tw , Q O 0 4-j 111""a,lkyy;`c�'m a � O u J Page 152 of 275 6.e) 6.40 p.m. DS2021-43, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re: Min... 0) fio O cu 70 U � U O C♦J i U) O a) � J U Q N - O N C O Cu U 70 •a) N U � C� .� 0) a C6 O tV a) O � 4-0 U O Page 153 of 275 6.e) 6.40 p.m. DS2021-43, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re: Min... L y a) ° a) LY N to Q L~ U) � O M Cu �1 O U) E Q N (B _ (n C C U)Zn C O C ? O) = C' N O U O � O N C O a) a) C a) U) O a) CO a) O E to L a) O O Q ° l^ F— (v (n C Cu CO -0 C a) > O Q a) -0 -0 U) E E L 0) a) a) L a) a) � U) U) 0C • O > C Cu L p U C NC Q U) C 0 O as a) Cu a) O a) a)O a) U �+ C C Q_0 (Q (Q C C L N — C O 0 (B 2 a) a a) QED 0 � OMOa) L 70 C O '~0- 0-0 Np Q > a) a) > 07 Q E 0 (U Q O 0 Lo � Q C >+ a) a) Cu U U v7 (B 0) a) �. a) 0 6 � U) -0 a) ° > a-. C U �' O7 O U � > �- a) co (n O — c a) C L6 -0 Q (r) x L - -a U C �i 07 O 07 a) a) c Q C a) a) O (II C C O C N _0 _ a) m 5 7 '� a) o M (n U) o)-a a) -0 > W �11 7 o 70 C >% >. a) a) a) > W co Ln o U) _a (n a) 0 0 V L a) C N a) N a) Q� a) a) Q a) Qoaa)) L � 0U) � ma) -0 n� a) L Ln O a) O O u C � Q ° C a) oa) ° - � a) � Fn _0O } a) U a)OU a)-0 U) in O r a) `u �o c�i `� C 1 0) > � � � � � a) Cu O i ) O N O Q - `� (Q Q O O O a) a) C L L = Np Q M N � � a) u) .0- (A M a) Q._ }� N Q a) U) N +J O — O U 4- O C 0 a) > b (v to Q Q Q C Q E (v 0 0 Q L N U Q Q Q (Q a) (II U Q ° L .0 Q N o Q a) m a) �; a) }> a) a) Q z ; C a) C C (v - a) � � CuCu a) 0 ° � EQ' O � � � � � � �� E ) 07 0 CO H OH O H > H Cu Cu C oO H H -0 O O H Q AV+ U W a) li N Page 154 of 275 6J) 6.50 p.m. DS2021-45, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re: Min... 1 ownship o f Report 0 Proud Heritruge, Exciting Feature Report No. To: Prepared By: DS2021-045 Development Services Catherine McLean Committee Intermediate Planner Meeting Date: Subject: Motion # April 7, 2021 Minor Variance Application 2021-A-18 Roll #: Bogdan Demkowicz R.M.S. File #: 4346-010-012-23900 2661 Lakeshore Road East D13 59228 Recommendation(s): Requires Action For Information Only It is recommended: 1 . That Report No. DS2021-045 be received and adopted. 2. That Minor Variance Application 2021-A-18 by Bogdan Demkowicz, specifically for permission to build a detached accessory building with an increased height of 7.3 metres (23.95 feet) and an increased floor area of 186.2 square metres (2,004.2 square feet), on lands municipally known as 2661 Lakeshore Road East, Township of Oro-Medonte, be denied on the basis that the proposed development does not conform to the general intent of the Zoning By-law, is not appropriate for the desirable development of the lot and is not minor. 3. And that the applicant be advised of the Development Services Committee's decision under the Secretary-Treasurer's signature. Background: The subject property has a lot area of 0.55 hectares (1.35 acres) and contains a single detached dwelling and boathouse currently under construction. The applicant is requesting relief from the following Sections of Zoning By-law 97-95, as amended: Section 5.1.4 — Maximum Height Required. Proposed: 4.5 metres (14.7 feet) 17.3 metres (23.95 feet) Section 5.1 .6 — Maximum Floor Area Required. Proposed: 70.0 square metres (753.5 square feet) T1 86.2 square metres (2,004.2 square feet) Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-045 Page 1 of 14 Page 155 of 275 6J) 6.50 p.m. DS2021-45, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re. Min... The applicant's site plan and elevation drawings are included as Schedules 3 and 4 to this report. Analysis: Provincial Policies Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) (2020) The Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) provides policy direction on matters of Provincial interest related to land use planning and development. Specifically, Section 1 .1 .4 — Rural Areas, Section 2.1 — Natural Heritage, Section 2.2 — Water and Section 3.1 — Natural Hazards are applicable to this application. The application represents limited, resource-based (shoreline) residential development that is consistent with the PPS with respect to Rural Areas. Planning Staff is of the opinion that this application is consistent with the Natural Heritage, Water, and Natural Hazards policies of the PPS, as the proposed development will not affect any natural features or functions. A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2020) A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe provides a long-term plan to manage growth and protect the natural environment. Section 2.2.9 Rural Areas is applicable to this application. This section has been reviewed and Planning Staff is of the opinion that the proposed detached accessory building is consistent with the Rural Areas policies in the Growth Plan as the lands subject to this application are already within an established shoreline residential area. The proposed development is located within 120 metres of an inland lake (Lake Simcoe). Section 4.2.4.5 of the Growth Plan permits development outside of settlement areas, in developed shoreline areas of inland lakes that are designated or zoned, as of July 1, 2017, for concentrations of shoreline residential development subject to certain conditions. Planning Staff is of the opinion that the proposed development conforms to the Growth Plan as the lands subject to this application are located within an established shoreline residential area that has been zoned for such residential use. Lake Simcoe Protection Plan (LSPP) The subject lands are located within the Lake Simcoe watershed where development is subject to the policies of the Lake Simcoe Protection Plan (LSPP) which came into effect in 2009. As per Section 6.45-DP (c), "accessory structures and uses, ... are permitted subject to a demonstration that the use does not expand into a key natural heritage feature, a key hydrologic feature and any minimum vegetation protection zone associated with a feature or the Lake Simcoe shoreline, unless there is no alternative in which case any expansion shall be limited in scope and kept within close geographical proximity to the existing structure" (p. 54). Planning Staff is of the opinion that the proposed development is consistent with the LSPP as the proposed detached Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-045 Page 2 of 14 Page 156 of 275 6J) 6.50 p.m. DS2021-45, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re. Min... accessory building will be located further from Lake Simcoe than the existing dwelling and it is not anticipated to have any adverse impact on the Lake Simcoe shoreline. The location of the proposed development is not regulated by the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority (LSRCA); however, since portions of the property are regulated, the application was circulated to the LSRCA. The LSRCA indicated that they are satisfied from a watershed management perspective that the application is consistent with the natural heritage and natural hazard policies of the LSPP. They indicated that the applicant will not be required to obtain a permit from LSRCA as site alteration/construction is not proposed in the regulated area. LSRCA's full comments are attached as Schedule 5 to this report. County Official Plan The property is designated Rural in Simcoe County's Official Plan. The Rural Designation permits limited residential development. In Planning Staff's opinion, the proposed development is consistent with the County's Official Plan as the proposed detached accessory building is accessory to the permitted residential use. Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13 Section 3(5) of the Planning Act states that all decisions in respect of the exercise of any authority that affects a planning matter shall be consistent with provincial policy statements and shall conform with or shall not conflict with the provincial plans that are in effect on the date of the decision. Section 45(1) of the Planning Act establishes a four-fold test for a minor variance which requires consideration of: (1) whether the variance is minor; (2) whether the variance is desirable for the appropriate development or use of the land, building or structure; (3) whether the general purpose and intent of the zoning by-law is maintained; and (4) whether the general purpose and intent of the Official Plan is maintained. A variance must meet all four of these tests. Planning Staff has reviewed this application against these four tests as follows: Do the variances conform to the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan? The subject lands are designated Shoreline in the Township's Official Plan. The intent of the Shoreline Designation is: • To maintain the existing character of this predominantly residential area; • To protect the natural features of the shoreline area and the immediate shoreline; and, • To ensure that existing development is appropriately serviced with water and sewer services. Permitted uses in the Shoreline designation include single detached dwellings and by extension accessory uses, such as detached garages. The proposed variances conform to the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan as the applicants are proposing to build a detached accessory building, which is Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-045 Page 3 of 14 Page 157 of 275 6J) 6.50 p.m. DS2021-45, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re. Min... accessory to a permitted residential use in the Shoreline Designation and is not anticipated to conflict with the Official Plan's objectives to protect the natural features of the shoreline area. Do the variances conform to the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law? The subject property is zoned Shoreline Residential (SR) in the Township's Zoning By- law 97-95. The proposed development of the lands requires relief from the Zoning By- law to permit the construction of a detached accessory building in the SR Zone with an increased maximum height and an increased maximum floor area. Detached accessory buildings are subject to maximum size restrictions to ensure that such structures remain secondary and subordinate, in both their appearance and use, to the main residential use of the lot, and to prevent over-development that would detract from the character of the area. Detached accessory buildings are permitted to be located in the front yard on lots that abut Lake Simcoe. The applicants are proposing to build a two storey detached accessory building in front of the dwelling and have requested an increase in floor area from 70.0 square metres (753.5 square feet) to 186.2 square metres (2,004.2 square feet). According to the agent, the second storey is proposed to be an open attic that may be used for storage. Despite the proposed increase in the floor area, the proposed accessory building will be well within the maximum permitted lot coverage of 5%. The height of a detached accessory building is measured from average grade to mid-roof. The applicants have requested an increase in height from 4.5 metres (14.8 feet) to 7.3 metres (23.95 feet). The proposed accessory building will be smaller than the existing single detached dwelling which is approximately 483.9 square metres (5,209.0 square feet) according to Township Building Permit records. Based on the size of the dwelling, the proposed accessory building will remain secondary and subordinate to the primary residential use on this lot. Nevertheless, the proposed variances represent significant increases above the by-law standards and Planning Staff have concerns that the proposed accessory building would detract from the established character and built form of this shoreline residential neighbourhood. On this basis, it is Planning Staff's opinion that the proposed detached accessory building does not conform to the general purpose and intent of the Zoning By-law. Are the variances desirable for the appropriate development of the lot? During the site visit, Planning Staff considered surrounding properties and the established character and built form of the neighbourhood and found that the majority of the surrounding properties are significantly smaller in area than the subject lands. Planning Staff researched MPAC records of surrounding properties and found that the proposed accessory building would be larger than a number of the existing surrounding single detached dwellings and there are no accessory buildings of a similar size in this area; all existing accessory buildings are smaller. The proposed accessory building would be the largest within this area and has the potential to establish a precedent for future development within this neighbourhood. The cumulative effect of such potential Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-045 Page 4 of 14 Page 158 of 275 6J) 6.50 p.m. DS2021-45, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re: Min... development would be accessory buildings becoming an increasingly dominant built form within the area. Although, the proposed detached accessory building would be secondary and subordinate to the dwelling on the subject lands, it would not be secondary and subordinate to the majority of the dwellings along this section of Lakeshore Road East. Therefore, Planning Staff have concerns that the proposed structure will stand-out, look out of place and detract from the character of this established shoreline residential neighbourhood. For these reasons, Planning Staff are of the opinion that the proposed variances are not considered appropriate for the desirable development of the lot. Are the variances minor? "Minor" is not determined on a mathematical basis. Neither the number of variances requested nor the percentage of difference between the permitted standard and what is proposed are counted. Instead, the question is one of whether there will be an adverse impact and what site-specific characteristics the lands may have that could mitigate those impacts. For example, on a different property in a different setting the same variances might be entirely appropriate. However, in this case, the proposed variances represent significant increases above the by-law standards and would detract from the establish character and built form of this shoreline residential neighbourhood. As the proposed variances are not considered to meet the general intent of the Zoning By-law and are not desirable for the appropriate development or use of the lot, the variances are not considered to be minor. Financial / Legal Implications / Risk Management: Potential financial and legal implications should the decision of the Committee be appealed to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT) and Council chooses to defend the Committee's decision. Policies/Legislation: • Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13 • Provincial Policy Statement, 2020 • A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, 2020 • Lake Simcoe Protection Plan • County of Simcoe Official Plan • Township of Oro-Medonte Official Plan • Township of Oro-Medonte Zoning By-law No. 97-95, as amended Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-045 Page 5 of 14 Page 159 of 275 6J) 6.50 p.m. DS2021-45, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re. Min... Corporate Strategic Goals: In 2016, Council adopted the Township's Strategic Plan. The following Goals of the Plan are relevant to this application: Balanced Growth: • Ensure land use planning policies manage change and promote economic activity that does not negatively impact the Township's natural heritage features and attributes. Staff are of the opinion that the proposed development will not negatively impact the Township's natural features and attributes. Consultations: A notice sign was posted on the property and notice of the application was circulated to agencies, Township Departments and to assessed property owners within a 60-metre (200 feet) radius of the lands. Comments were received from the neighbours located at 2669 Lakeshore Road East, adjacent to the subject lands, indicating that they have concerns with the size of the proposed accessory building and that it will cause additional drainage problems. As of the preparation of this report, the following comments have been received Township Departments and External Agencies: • Township Building Division — No comments • Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority — See Schedule 5 Attachments: Schedule 1 : Location Map Schedule 2: Aerial Photo Schedule 3: Applicant's Site Plan Schedule 4: Elevation Drawings Schedule 5: Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority Comments dated March 28, 2021 Conclusion: Planning Staff recommends that Minor Variance Application 2021-A-18 be denied, specifically to permit construction of a detached accessory building with an increased height of 7.3 metres (23.95 feet) and an increased floor area of 186.2 square metres (2,004.2 square feet), on the basis that variances are not considered to meet the general intent of the Zoning By-law, are not desirable for the appropriate development or use of the lot, and are not minor. Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-045 Page 6 of 14 Page 160 of 275 6J) 6.50 p.m. DS2021-45, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re. Min... Respectfully submitted: Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner Approvals: Date: Derek Witlib, Manager Planning Services April 1, 2021 Andria Leigh, Director Development Services April 1, 2021 Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-045 Page 7 of 14 Page 161 of 275 6J) 6.50 p.m. DS2021-45, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re. Min... Schedule 1: Location Map J � waoeewn-Rd. Harsee6� ia If u� 600 Lakeshore Rd.E. 2639 2599 2607 2613 302 2653 303 2691 2747 2701 2713 � 2569 2697 2661 W C 256 d 291 467 244 Q 234 t 226 fn 465 273 271 259 253 245 Lake 237 Simc0a= 233 223 Schedule 1 Location' ► fWnship r Subject Lands Proud Heritage,Exciting Future 0 100 m File Number,2021-A-18 I i Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-045 Page 8 of 14 Page 162 of 275 6J) 6.50 p.m. DS2021-45, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re. Min... Schedule 2: Aerial Photo OW7��awn•aa. - 4` I �.d Lakeshore Rd.E. H.m A�iV�.Iky,Hd.. I W e.rsd �I `�(lidgs.r�°ab A .i.w 1 Schedule 2 Aerial Photo Township of Subject Lands Proud Heritage,Exciting Future 0 40 m File Number:2021-A-18 N Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-045 Page 9 of 14 Page 163 of 275 6J) 6.50 p.m. DS2021-45, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re. Min... Schedule 3: Site Plan �- TRESPASS ROAD SSW Sfl4C8-01V�(l�} KNGWK AS LAnSHOREsg ROAD -T I s y R@GISTBRBD� �' Y LAN I 860 II _l Z _T y gg I I _ = I ' 0 Schedule 3 Applicant's Site Plan TourrrslrrP File Number2021-A-18 Proud Heritage,Excirin¢Future Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-045 Page 10 of 14 Page 164 of 275 6J) 6.50 p.m. DS2021-45, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re. Min... Schedule 4: Elevation Drawings uAll JL I IIu 11 I JI JL I-- -- I LuT ILl UJ u1-11J 111iLJ II 1 1 1 11 ill II ill l J ??r II II-141 ,III11 II III I I I II III Ili'I !I 1 _. ` l' L111J I J J I J - I J -_ TLLI �„ 1„III, 1IUII' 1`I l��114❑❑I LLI 11�I�1 1�l III LL -u 111 l Ll= I—API I�1 ri �' u I �I LLLI ` L I❑ LI L u / L 7 ❑❑❑❑ F❑❑ s e ------------------ FRONT EAST) ELEVATION acs - raw �`z- rSi r�-----i. ._._. -------Lr-----'1 i4 SIDE NORTH) E-EVATON Schedule 4 Applicant's Elevation Drawings 0 09UrZl'1 !/ File Number 2021-A-18 Proud Heritage,Exciting Future Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-045 Page 11 of 14 Page 165 of 275 6J) 6.50 p.m. DS2021-45, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re. Min... Schedule 5: Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority Comments dated March 28, 2021 Lake 5imoDe 13irti Cv1IS4CryEl G9 j3Jthew' t Sent try E-mail:akoro.iskuJYrsa�o-rreelo.nta.ca File ko:2021-A-16 IM-:File Ya.: -'A-1 8 133 1-0 3 18Z1 Koraiskakis SetretorrTneamrer TD wnship cxf Div-IV edonke 14S line 2 Sw h Oro-M edante:,ON LDL ZED Dez-Y-, Karniskekis: Re: M inn Variance Ap plication 2E61 Lakeshore Road East Towrshi p of Cl ro-Medonte -SR-_-stal'h-!,.e renewed the atrave-iso-ed AoG i.:at on fo-M r or Warianee:to aans-trudt a detached eacessary :-uilc n�w't i a he L-it of 7.3 metres and a low area of 13E 2 sc fare m etres. aocu me nts Peceieed,and Aei-iewwEd by Ste ,.aff h aye ace ,e d anc -v�iewa:d the folloWr,d acuments swam ittxd with this epali®tiacr: �ppl:arr;S ,e }lan _toff Ines reaievwed this application aj aer our delegated responsioility horn the Province to re arose nt prowirrial nterem regardira natural hwards:identified in Sactibn 3.1 of the:Pratirinciol Foliq Statement IPPS,Z820 and as a re6ulatorr eutharitf under l] io Re6u lotion 1?9,;46. The:a aplicatibn has:also been rcdie:w+e:d throuGlr our role as a prjhlit 3od'q-inderthe Pwnirig Actas per vir CA Board saprowe:d palioes. site charodmistim EristnS maapirG indicates thrat the srihject property is nertiailly rqulated due to the wsodated shoreline f4aod and erosion hazards. ■ The suojett prap uty is currenttle desiSnoted 5hore4ne in the 3otiwnsihip of ors-M edonteis Official Plan. ■ The suhjett prap"is currenttir aancd shwedine R,!sidef W 1511J Zone. 120 Ba-rvhI w Patkway — 905 A95.1201 NtWITICHket. onrrario UY 3W3 I F 905.853.5801 ML-rnL--!!i ur Criserycidws Oit°drio TF 1.80C.455.0437 Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-045 Page 12 of 14 Page 166 of 275 6J) 6.50 p.m. DS2021-45, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re- Min... Lake Sip, gage 2 of 3 Lek Am" M.M=0 woo L �r�Er y�rrE ♦ _.J 1 7 h ♦ ' v! f � t. 4♦�+.�.�fwF�JY rr..n�� tier w ►�.�.. in Im 1. LSRCA he;reviewed the apalication mroup our delegated responsibirty from the Province to rep-went orovincial interest: reprding nov rai N&zard identified in Section 3.1 of the Provincia, Policy Statemert I;PPS. ,w - me policies of the PPS and otter= _. - _ :�ol+ces ZU&as the Growth Pan JA .wFP ?he proposed detaches -i = _' +vithir t15e ecinty of arrV natural -. - RCA rc satisfied from a w-vtersrew r_ .ert perspective tfsat the proposal is cc., -:ent with the PPS and in conformity with prorno=al r.a,ural nerita,e pokie»and the LSPP RG4 has renewed the apprcatbn as per oL•-e. ors+ailities as a re ulatdry put) rty under Drrterio 1-9!06. This regu+ation, maoe under Sett _- y3 of the Consarvatior, Aatndrities Act eraales rohorMiesto regulate deve+opwent in oradjy=--t wnveror -ee-n tV4-,-rr.Great Lakesand inland _-ses, ha:ar**u: *no: and wetler Dertiopm,ert taking pace on theme and% may t-le confero3ton authority to car. T that the sorts of flooding, erosion,&(namic e corservatior, o! and are hL - _ w LSRCA a)so resulates the alteratian to or Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-045 Page 13 of 14 Page 167 of 275 6J) 6.50 p.m. DS2021-45, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re: Min... 1 4 F'sir -PH11i.i -:ourse or wetland.The location of the aoce.-.sory huitiin6:%p ears tO ae at_ :- sr. -=r_ e: z-ea o-: ;• tF^#ncM1are not require a permit I"m LSRCA. Summary LSRCA is rati,ied fro m a waterMed mar emeryt P-!roecti^dE that tfre apalimtion is consistent with the natural heritage and natural hward F-aioes of fare L P'.Try arc aosa;l will not re re a 3erm it from LSRCA Given the wove oamments,it is the opirian of the LSRrCA.that: 1. Gons ste:nry with Section IL of the PPS has:mean demonstrated, 2. Ontario Regiletion [174,'Cfl apaliex to the sutrie:d:site:.The A3plioant vo 1 nca he rec drew to atetain a 7ermit fro n URCA as:site a terartion,roonstruttion is:ro:,�Praoosed in the regulated ww:. Fleasle inform us on the resuFtina decision 1br this kppiication. S rcereP, Shaun Filson Planner 1 Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-045 Page 14 of 14 Page 168 of 275 6J) 6.50 p.m. DS2021-45, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re. Min... From: McCartney, Garry<gmccartney@oro-medonte.ca> Sent: Friday, March 19, 2021 3:40 PM To: Falconi, Teresa <tfalconi@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: RE: Notice of Public Hearing- Development Services Committee Meeting, April 07, 2021 (2021- A-18) Demkowicz Building Division has no comments at this time. Thank you, Garry McCartney Page 169 of 275 6J) 6.50 p.m. DS2021-45, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re. Min... From:SCHWARTZ<eileenschwartz@rogers.com> Sent: Friday, March 26, 2021 11:36 AM To: Planning<Planning@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: 2661 Lakeshore Road East-Application 2021-A-18 To Whom it May Concern, I am the neighbour at 2669 Lakeshore Road East. The neighbour's home is a new construction. The owner has applied to add an accessory building of 2,000 square feet. I am concerned as I have had lots of problems with drainage onto my property (flooding actually) since this property has been built. I have tried to be patient as the owner keeps saying he is doing what he can about the drainage. It is not working. If you look at the property, it has been almost completely covered with paving stones resulting in tremendous flooding onto our property. This new addition to 2661 will add to this problem. I would like to talk to someone in planning because if I can get reassurances from Bob my neighbour or from you, that this new garage will not add more problems to my mature trees (many have disappeared already from my property) and to the drainage problems that have already been created from the building that has been going on for 5 years. I do not object to the building of a garage of the required maximum floor area of 753.5 square feet and the required height of 14.7 feet. The size proposed[ appears to be twice the required and not sustainable for the property as it now is. The environment will be adversely affected. Yours very truly, Eileen and Al Schwartz eileenschwartza.rogers.com Page 170 of 275 6J) 6.50 p.m. DS2021-45, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re: Min... Lake Silmcoe Region conservation authority www.LSRCA.on.ca Sent by E-mail:akaraiskakis@oro-medonte.ca March 28, 2021 File No: 2021-A-18 IMS File No.: VA-181831-031821 Andy Karaiskakis Secretary-Treasurer Township of Oro-Medonte 148 Line 7 South Oro-Medonte, ON LOL 2EO Dear Mr. Karaiskakis: Re: Minor Variance Application 2661 Lakeshore Road East Township of Oro-Medonte LSRCA staff have reviewed the above-noted Application for Minor Variance to construct a detached accessory building with a height of 7.3 metres and a floor area of 186.2 square metres. Documents Received and Reviewed by Staff Staff have received and reviewed the following documents submitted with this application: • Applicant's Site Plan Staff has reviewed this application as per our delegated responsibility from the Province to represent provincial interests regarding natural hazards identified in Section 3.1 of the Provincial Policy Statement(PPS, 2020) and as a regulatory authority under Ontario Regulation 179/06. The application has also been reviewed through our role as a public body under the Planning Act as per our CA Board approved policies. Site Characteristics Existing mapping indicates that the subject property is partially regulated due to the associated shoreline flood and erosion hazards. • The subject property is currently designated Shoreline in the Township of Oro-Medonte's Official Plan. • The subject property is currently zoned Shoreline Residential (SR)Zone. 120 Bayview Parkway T 905.895.1281 Newmarket, Ontario L3Y 3W3 F 905.853.5881 Member of Conservation Ontario Page 171 o-fF275.800.465.0437 6J) 6.50 p.m. DS2021-45, Catherine McLean, IntermediateLP4mMeleftyiMin... conservation authority Page 2of3 Features Lake SSmme Region L [drlser 'Jtlon authan['; __ -SRCA WataralwEd Bolndary 13 LSPP WaW shed Bmrsdary — RegWaBw Boundary • Regueation Area Asaftsmart ParcaF ALIAS i1�71A'1 Ewl,WCf.,r<0 E Lot and Caneaatian AKCR Ai RCi C Road Labaia yHOr€R E �- - •-• Wa�K.Y7lK9C iaoo kAR RER E Roeds eel LVIK N ,-Ro E MM'.ms.— ZdBa Lli Z E _ � �6�LAiLESM ROE sed aewe Railway Yb L KEBM wu /. L m Fier MllaielpWy 1a. ;H Cw etY-LIrKESKOF -L yi:M.ASl Eli 47R E,- - 17 Gv$Ho Ff I.IN F DR W 1i5 MCA zL NE D4 ✓ n.n.e rx y � 712fl2�21 2% 440ALL1NE' H EL RP RELINE OR Amy i.�.steer � 0914ORFAINEOP ��rwr.+4.s.e. ~�stiEr'vrr i+...r.r.1r.rw.r..rarorerww. 1!1 5H CLr1E ORraulu`i mfto. r.. Y H it r?E 0 ehwaawnar...�..rwc.awrer•aww qt�rdarc�a �.arr+.�0�v�.•rdr SH(RELINE RR .e ao.rra~'a ...�.r m�s .wrara.uw tisrarrr a 0,w nrnr.rw awl u aavaor an+tea.aw Seem 1; 1423 Motors 82 0 41 U 1. LSRCA has reviewed the application through our delegated responsibility from the Province to represent provincial interests regarding natural hazards identified in Section 3.1 of the Provincial Policy Statement (PPS, 2020) as well as the natural heritage policies of the PPS and other provincial policies such as the Growth Plan (A Place to Grow, 2020) and the LSPP. The proposed detached building is not within the vicinity of any natural hazards or heritage features. LSRCA is satisfied from a watershed management perspective that the proposal is consistent with the PPS and in conformity with provincial natural heritage policies and the LSPP. 2. LSRCA has reviewed the application as per our responsibilities as a regulatory authority under Ontario Regulation 179/06. This regulation, made under Section 28 of the Conservation Authorities Act, enables conservation authorities to regulate development in or adjacent to river or stream valleys,Great Lakes and inland lake shorelines, watercourses, hazardous lands and wetlands. Development taking place on these lands may require permission from the conservation authority to confirm that the control of flooding, erosion, dynamic beaches, pollution or the conservation of land are not affected. LSRCA also regulates the alteration to or Page 172 of 275 6J) 6.50 p.m. DS2021-45, Catherine McLean, IntermediateLP4miMeleftyiMin... conservation authority Page 3 of 3 interference in any way with a watercourse or wetland. The location of the accessory building appears to be outside of any regulated area and will therefore not require a permit from LSRCA. Summary LSRCA is satisfied from a watershed management perspective that the application is consistent with the natural heritage and natural hazard policies of the LSPP. The proposal will not require a permit from LSRCA. Given the above comments, it is the opinion of the LSRCA that: 1. Consistency with Section 3.1 of the PPS has been demonstrated; 2. Ontario Regulation [179/06] applies to the subject site. The Applicant will not be required to obtain a permit from LSRCA as site alteration/construction is not proposed in the regulated area. Please inform us on the resulting decision for this Application. Sincerely, Shawn Filson Planner 1 Page 173 of 275 6J) 6.50 p.m. DS2O21-45, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re: Min... March 30,2021 Laurette Green 2675 Lakeshore Road East LOL 1T0 Re: 2661 Site Plan Hearing Date:April 7,2021 Time: 6:50 pm Location:Township of Oro-Medonte Council Chambers 148 Line 7 South, Oro-Medonte ON LOL 2E0 Application:2021-A-18 Owner:Bogdan Demkowicz Subject Lands: 2661 Lakeshore Road East Purpose: The applicant is proposing to build a detached accessory building. The applicant is seeking relief to the following sections of Zoning By-law 97-95: Section 5.1.4—Maximum Height Required: 4.5 metres(14.7 feet)Proposed: 7.3 metres(23.95 feet)Section 5.1.6—Maximum Floor Area Required: 70.0 square metres(753.5 square feet)Proposed: 186.2 square metres(2,004.2 square feet) Dear Sirs and Madams Concerns and Grievances for by laws 97-95. We received a notice of Public Hearing for a Minor Variance Application for the above address at 2661 Lakeshore Road East.We also received plan and elevations drawings for the proposed accessory building that upon a closer read,under section 5.14 violates sections Zoning By-law 97-95,as follows: • Maximum Height requirement is 14.7 feet,and the proposed application is for 23.95,that supersede the requirement by almost 10 feet with a second storey over what is rendered as living quarters,built over top of a two door garage,with dormer windows and gabled windows. • Under Section 5.16—Maximum Floor Area requirements,that state 753.5 square feet,the proposed building demands 2,004.2 square feet,and as the renderings reveal,supports a second level that would allow for more footage,which may become a building of a two storey home in the future. Upon further inspection of the lot and elevation drawings we feel Mr.Demkowicz's property cannot sustain such a structure that would once again damage and diminish drainage,trees,green space on such a sensitive environmental lakeside property.We can appreciate his want for another garage,but to raise yet another lakeside building of that proportion does not seem sustainable,and he has not accounted for drainage issues as there are no catchment areas for the water to drain,either through the lack of grass and proper sewers. Thank you for listening to our concerns,and we feel the planning committee can revisit this application once they gain an awareness for the impacts that are in the works through expansion without environmental or ecological inputs. Laurette Green Page 174 of 275 6J) 6.50 p.m. DS2021-45, Min... 6f) Additional correspondence received From: Orest Stoyanovskyy <orests(ayahoo.com> Sent: April 6, 2021 3.30 PM To: McLean, Catherine <cm clean(d�oro-medonte.ca> Subject: Re: Minor Variance Application Hi Catherine, Thank you so much for taking a call! Just to confirm, as we talked: my client would like to defer the application to revise the proposal, possibly to reduce the height and floor area, with respect to your comments. Please if you could put us on a next available hearing, I would really appreciate it. I'll bring the revision asap for your review. If there anything else please advise! Thanks so much, Orest Orest Stoyanovskyy M.Arch, OAA, MRAIC Stoyanovskyy Architects, Inc. T:416.571 .3493 194 Royal York Rd., Suite 101 Toronto, On, M8V 2V6 direct E: orests(a-)vahoo.com office E: mail(a)stoyanovskyy.com Page 175 of 275 6J) 6.50 p.m. DS2021-45, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re: Min... NS4Lew, o z Neo 3 °+ O W d E C L Y (jM�) _V 1 ~e t Sys N O N O .0 ry C ry Cu (D — U - a) ca 4-0 U) U) cu - _0 CIO J a) > U) 10� O c� ° c�a can .� U) a o • • Cu -jw N Page 176 of 275 6J) 6.50 p.m. DS2021-45, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re: MinLO ... 0) w U — z . co O & >, _Ile 0m E U) 0) � U � N 00 O O C c� Q a) O a- 0 U N N CU O CD to o N 'Z3 �_ aD U) LO aD rn � O O O CO +� lO. N ( (nv) O o O(D L LCO O 0 Q_ ti Q � U Q cu .c� �. L 'L Q O O a' _ Lr) c�\ c� / .(n ti E E v O — cu O ~ (3) G N O O L VJ � � P1 E .L .L CT L Cu O E O "� O (� C/) Page 177 of 275 6J) 6.50 p.m. DS2021-45, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re: Min... N � x z U 3 a O _V J . tp 'r t N O N O C6 U CL Q N U Cu .L— Cu O o � a L Q Page 178 of 275 6J) 6.50 p.m. DS2021-45, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re- Min... w N � x z U 3 a e • I LOT 6 ,a co ' jr :RS7P Ir p0 • R4!J 4� LOT I i �W� 2, nM a'I Y 11t9!!b J 1 o. usa, _�- oi61 a QA ea srso a,s, l�Tl LOT i� t 64 N I IST6RW I LOT 11 PUN LOT 10 LOTe9 O -1-_+ C6 U Q— Q (D U Cu U) O (0) � v CL CL Q Page 179 of 275 6J) 6.50 p.m. DS2021-45, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re- Min... �I N e EEEEIj a E F1 7777 r 00 6y h\ O ;. N O_ 4--+ C6 _ — — �II Cu 0 - - ELL- HE Cu — — 6 - - ❑❑❑- } _ J V J y^ CL rs Q Page 180 of 275 6J) 6.50 p.m. DS2021-45, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re- Min... N Neo U z 3 °+ E: O E 0) 00 iz U O CD ri Q � O Q cu /ice�� F 1.1 _ W. h t 4•. :ba fey O w Cu O 75 Page 181 of 275 6J) 6.50 p.m. DS2021-45, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re- Min... 0) N o � Cu a ca W O � o -0 Neo o CO � L 0) W i i � I x t O Cu 4 N O N O Cu U W Cu Cu cu a) O Cu o 0 0 O (U J J Page 182 of 275 6J) 6.50 p.m. DS2021-45, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re- Min... CO Ile Y j a W 00 a) O N O Cu U 0 o 6 $' 4-j U) -0 cu O ll ; a) U I � L y rlll s = a , �., a) ICI O p a) Np Page 183 of 275 S.q 6:50 p.m. IDS2O2]-45, Catherine McLean, In [media Planners: Min.. . 2 U)CO (v y ƒ e22 2 k E Cu \ \ 0 0\ § % J / / % / / \%\ .m Q 00 O u � S \ k 0 � o E /NeoU0f / q \� _ _ > Co Cu ƒ / 2 E \ \ / \ \ \ % Cu .\ 2 a) a) a) CO I = -0 % $ / 2 R 0 U) COE \ / / / 2 / 0 Q O .0 E CO 2 / 52 -0 \ 70= G 6 ' e E O E = Q . 3 ■ CO@ 2 0 Q I Q O / 4-- ® ^ � � g @ -0 � a) � E e e o � $ o / % ± R 7 � E U t 5 6 0 \ �CY) 2 e U) CL E � § E � ) 0 Cu E Q = E / E Q .o % / 0 U 2 E m E o 0- o Q / § b L § 2 / -2 cu- E - .» ¥ '/ O CO Q a) E Q 3 % : / CO I- M .@ 0 a) 327E 2 � 0 0L- � Q- _0 a) > _0 m / % \ � 00 0 ( 3 � 6E = % Q 2 © � ƒ = 2 E / E / Uf � � 2 2 E o — e < q_ 0 � = I Q Q ' ® e ® 3 � E > Q \ / � / \ 0 \ > / / E2 / 2 V 7 u cu Q 0g �e ._ I ) .� / Cu 6 a C f 2 I 2 Cu / a) -0 Q � / a) % E < .2) O = g S / CU / k 3 � / � k \ , > � o � � Co 2 f $ $ ƒ � C) � Cl) k ® ® _ k 0 § �/ f 0 — Co % a) Q- / % $ / Cl) _ E / Cu 7 / / @ '� E / / / \ % §_ % E 2 q < 0 w w4E0 k ± & 6 C4 � / Page184 0 275 6.g) 7.00 p.m. DS2021-48, Andria Leigh, Director, Development Services r... 1 ownship o f Report 0 Proud Heritruge, Exciting Feature Report No. To: Development Services Prepared By: DS2021-048 Committee Andria Leigh, Director Development Services Meeting Date: Subject: Motion # April 7, 2021 Consent Applications 2021-B-15 and 2021-B-16 by Roll #: Craighurst GP Inc. R.M.S. File #: 4346-020-001-01100 3555 and 3507 D10-59207 and and 4346-020-001- Penetanguishene Road D10-59208 01300 Recommendation(s): Requires Action For Information Only It is recommended: 1. That Report No. DS2021-048 be received and adopted. 2. That the Development Services Committee grant provisional consent to Application 2021-13-15 to permit a boundary adjustment with a 0 metre lot frontage, a lot depth of approximately 20 metres (65.6 feet) and an area of approximately 0.02 hectares (0.05 acres) to be added to the property located at 3507 Penetanguishene Road, subject to the conditions as outlined in Report DS2021-048. 3. The conditions are as follows for Application 2021-13-15: a) That the severed lands be consolidated with the abutting property to the west and that the provisions of Section 50(3) and 50(5) of the Planning Act apply to any subsequent conveyance of, or other transaction involving, the identical subject parcel of land. Therefore, once the subject parcels of land has been conveyed to the owner of the abutting parcel (being 3507 Penetanguishene Road), the subject parcels and the said abutting parcel shall be consolidated and become one parcel of land. A solicitor's written undertaking shall be provided to the Secretary-Treasurer indicating that the necessary steps will be taken to implement the conveyance and to consolidate the parcels to one Property Identifier Number; b) That one copy of a Registered Reference Plan of the subject lands prepared by an Ontario Land Surveyor be submitted to the Committee Secretary- Treasurer-, c) That the applicant's solicitor prepare and submit a copy of the proposed conveyance for the parcel severed, for review by the Municipality; d) That all municipal taxes be paid to the Township of Oro-Medonte; Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-048 Page 1 of 14 Page 185 of 275 6.g) 7.00 p.m. DS2021-48, Andria Leigh, Director, Development Services r... e) That the Certificate of Consent be issued utilizing Form 4, Section 53 (42) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, to merge the parcels; and, f) That the conditions of consent imposed by the Committee be fulfilled within one year from the date of the giving of the notice of decision (Approval shall lapse where the conditions have not been fulfilled within one year of being imposed and/or two years from the date of the certificate if the transaction has not been finalized). WARNING: Failing to fulfil the conditions within the above- noted statutory periods (Sections 53(41) & 53(43), the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990) shall cause the application to lapse and render this Decision null and void. 3. That the Development Services Committee grant provisional consent to Application 2021-B-16 to permit a boundary adjustment with a 0 metre lot frontage, a lot depth of approximately 1176.3 metres (3859.3 feet) and an area of approximately 25.8 hectares (63.8 acres) to be added to the property located at 3555 Penetanguishene Road, subject to the conditions as outlined in Report DS2021-048 4. The conditions are as follows for Application 2021-B-16: a) That the applicant obtain final approval of Consent application 2021-B-15 to the satisfaction of the Township of Oro-Medonte. b) That the severed lands be consolidated with the abutting property to the east and that the provisions of Section 50(3) and 50(5) of the Planning Act apply to any subsequent conveyance of, or other transaction involving, the identical subject parcel of land. Therefore, once the subject parcels of land has been conveyed to the owner of the abutting parcel (being 3555 Penetanguishene Road), the subject parcels and the said abutting parcel shall be consolidated and become one parcel of land. A solicitor's written undertaking shall be provided to the Secretary-Treasurer indicating that the necessary steps will be taken to implement the conveyance and to consolidate the parcels to one Property Identifier Number. c) That one copy of a Registered Reference Plan of the subject lands prepared by an Ontario Land Surveyor be submitted to the Committee Secretary- Treasurer; d) That the applicant's solicitor prepare and submit a copy of the proposed conveyance for the parcel severed, for review by the Municipality; e) That all municipal taxes be paid to the Township of Oro-Medonte; f) That the Certificate of Consent be issued utilizing Form 4, Section 53 (42) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, to merge the parcels; and, g) That the conditions of consent imposed by the Committee be fulfilled within one year from the date of the giving of the notice of decision (Approval shall lapse where the conditions have not been fulfilled within one year of being imposed and/or two years from the date of the certificate if the transaction has not been finalized). WARNING: Failing to fulfil the conditions within the above- noted statutory periods (Sections 53(41) & 53(43), the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990) shall cause the application to lapse and render this Decision null and void. Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-048 Page 2 of 14 Page 186 of 275 6.g) 7.00 p.m. DS2021-48, Andria Leigh, Director, Development Services r... 5. And that the applicant be advised of the Development Services Committee's decision under the Secretary-Treasurer's signature. Background: The lands proposed to be severed, retained and merged are located on the north side of County Road 22 (Horseshoe Valley Road West) and east of County Road 93 (Penetanguishene Road), and currently support rural-residential and agricultural uses. The majority of the subject lands were draft plan approved on October 30, 2019 for a 319 lot residential plan of subdivision (2003-SUB-01) (see Schedule 4 for approved draft plan of subdivision) and Block 343 on that plan reflects the retained lands shown in Application 2021-B16. The lands to be severed through Application 2021-B-15 are vacant and are proposed to be merged with the abutting property to the south that contain an existing dwelling. The retained lands are used for residential and agricultural purposes and as noted are the site of the future residential subdivision. The lands to be severed through Application 2021-B-16 are vacant and are proposed to be merged with the abutting property to the north, being 3555 Penetanguishene Road containing an existing dwelling. The retained lands (reflecting Block 343 on Schedule 4) contain an existing dwelling. The merged lands reflect the draft plan approved residential subdivision shown on Schedule 4. Surrounding land uses predominantly consist of agricultural, residential, and environmental protection land uses and lands within the Craighurst Settlement Area. (Refer to Schedules 1 and 2). Purpose of Application 2021-B-15: The applicants are requesting consent to sever and merge lands for the purpose of a boundary adjustment as noted below: Lands to be added to 3507 Lands to be Retained: Penetanguishene Road: Frontage: n/a 221.9 m (728 ft.) Depth: 20 m (65.6 ft.) 1036.8 m (3401.5 ft.) Area: 0.02 ha (0.05 ac.) 23.2 ha (57.3 ac.) Use: Residential Residential Purpose of Application 2021-B-16: The applicant is requesting consent to sever and merge lands for the purpose of a boundary adjustment as noted below: Lands to be added to 3555 Lands to be Retained: Penetanguishene Road: Frontage: n/a 87.7 m (287.73 ft.) Depth: 1176.3 m (3859.3 ft.) 83.2 m (272.96 ft.) Area: 25.8 ha (63.8 ac.) 0.76 ha (1.88 ac.) Use: Residential Residential Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-048 Page 3 of 14 Page 187 of 275 6.g) 7.00 p.m. DS2021-48, Andria Leigh, Director, Development Services r... No new lots are proposed as a result of the lot addition Sketches identifying the two boundary adjustments are contained in Schedule 3. Policies, Legislation and Analysis: Provincial Policies The Provincial Policy Statement (2020) (PPS) provides policy direction on matters of Provincial interest related to land use planning and development. The intent of the PPS is to build strong and healthy communities while at the same time, promoting efficient land use and development patterns. Lot adjustments may be permitted for legal or technical reasons (Section 2.3.4.2) including minor boundary adjustments which do not result in the creation of a new lot. The policies of A Place to Grow, Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2020) have been reviewed and do not affect the application, since the proposed boundary adjustment does not represent "development" as defined by the Growth Plan. Based on the above, the proposed boundary adjustment conforms to applicable Provincial policies. County of Simcoe Official Plan The subject lands are designated "Settlements" and `Greenlands' in accordance with the County of Simcoe Official Plan. The `Settlements' designated area generally aligns with the location of the 319 lot draft approved residential plan of subdivision (2003-SUB- 01) while the `Greenlands' designated area aligns with the lands located outside of the settlement area boundary, containing the woodland feature, and identified as Other Lands owned by applicant on the draft plan. Section 3.3.5 of the County's Official Plan contains policies relating to the boundary adjustment and states that "consents for the purposes of legal and technical reasons and consolidation of land holdings may be permitted but shall not be for the purpose of creating new lots." The two applications do not result in the creation of a new lot but rather a land consolidation to reflect two reconfigured lots size being: (1) the larger consolidated land holding containing the draft approved residential plan of subdivision and (2) the smaller lot containing the existing dwelling at 3507 Penetanguishene Road. The County has been circulated the subject application given both properties front onto a County Road (County Road 93 —Penetanguishene Road); however both lots currently have existing entrances onto Penetanguishene Road. At the time of writing of this report, comments have yet to be received from the County; and the Committee should have regard to any County comments that may be received. However, Township Planning Staff is of the opinion that both applications conform to the County of Simcoe Official Plan. Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-048 Page 4 of 14 Page 188 of 275 6.g) 7.00 p.m. DS2021-48, Andria Leigh, Director, Development Services r... Township of Oro-Medonte Official Plan The subject lands are designated `Rural Settlement Area", `Rural' (small portion on 3507 Penetanguishene Road), and `Oro-Medonte Core-Corridor Area' in accordance with "Schedule A — Land Use" of the Township's Official Plan. The area of the draft approved subdivision is located within the Rural Settlement Area; the Oro Moraine Core-Corridor designation applies is consistent with the area designated `Greenlands' in the County of Simcoe Official Plan. The policies of the `Rural Settlement Area' and "Oro Moraine Core-Corridor Area" designations do not specifically address boundary adjustments, but policy guidance with respect to boundary adjustments is found in Section D2.2.2 of the Oro-Medonte Official Plan. Section D2.2.2 states that "[a] consent may be permitted for the purpose of modifying lot boundaries, provided no new building lot is created [and] the Committee of Adjustment shall be satisfied that the boundary adjustment will not affect the viability of the use of the properties affected as intended by this Plan". The lands to be severed through both lot additions/boundary adjustments currently contain residential uses. The two boundary adjustment applications result in the consolidation of the two larger land holdings the dwelling on 3507 Penetanguishene Road (which is identified as Block 343 on the draft approved plan of subdivision) as the retained lands. Through the registration of the plan of subdivision, this retained lot would have also resulted as a separate conveyable parcel. These applications consolidate the large parcels to be developed through the subdivision process and establish Block 343 as a separately conveyable lot, shown as other lands owned by applicant on the draft plan. Planning Staff is of the opinion that these applications, if approved, will not negatively affecting the functionality or viability of the retained or benefitting parcels and will continue to facilitate the future draft plan of subdivision. On the basis of the preceding, it is Planning Staff's opinion that the applications conform to the Township's Official Plan. Township of Oro-Medonte Zoning By-law No. 97-95, as amended The subject lands at 3507 Penetanguishene are currently zoned: Agricultural/Rural (A/RU), Environmental Protection Exception 302 (EP*302), Residential One Exception 301 Holding Two (R1*301(H2)), and Open Space (OS). The lands at 3555 Penetanguishene Road are zoned Residential One Exception 301 Holding Two (R1*301(H2)), Environmental Protection Exception 302 (EP*302), Open Space (OS), Agricultural/Rural (A/RU), and Environmental Protection (EP) in the Township's Zoning By-law 97-95, as amended. The multitude of zones applicable to both parcels is a reflection of the specific locations of lots/blocks within the draft approved plan of subdivision. The A/RU zoned lands reflect the boundaries of Block 343 on the draft plan being the existing dwelling at 3507 Penetanguishene Road; in addition to the lands at the back of both properties and outside the draft plan boundaries. Both parcels following the two lot additions/boundary adjustments will continue to comply with the applicable zone provisions for lot frontage Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-048 Page 5 of 14 Page 189 of 275 6.g) 7.00 p.m. DS2021-48, Andria Leigh, Director, Development Services r... and area required for the existing and future intended land uses. Existing uses of each property would continue provided they comply with the zoning provisions applicable to the specific portions of the lands. The lands zoned Environmental Protection (EP), containing the two watercourses, are also regulated by the Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority in the Conservation Authorities Act. In a letter dated March 25, 2021 NVCA staff have confirmed that the applications are consistent with/conform to the Provincial natural heritage and hazard policies and are also in conformity with the NVCA policies based on the technical studies prepared and approved through the plan of subdivision process. NVCA staff have also confirm that a permit would be required for any development within the NVCA regulation limit. Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.P.13 Section 51(24) of the Planning Act contains criteria that an approval authority must have regard to when considering a plan of subdivision or a consent application (if no subdivision is required). Planning Staff, having had regard to Section 51(24), is satisfied that the Consent Applications for the lot additions/boundary adjustments meet the requirements of the Planning Act and that no plan of subdivision is required for this specific application recognizing that the overall lands are already the subject of a draft approved plan of subdivision. Financial / Legal Implications / Risk Management: Potential financial and legal implications should the decision of the Committee be appealed to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT) and Council chooses to defend the Committee's decision. Policies/Legislation: • Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.P.13 • Provincial Policy Statement, 2020 • A Place to Grow, Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe 2020 • County of Simcoe Official Plan • Oro-Medonte Official Plan • Oro-Medonte Zoning By-law No. 97-95, as amended Corporate Strategic Goals: The Township's following Strategic Goal is relevant to this application: Balanced Growth: Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-048 Page 6 of 14 Page 190 of 275 6.g) 7.00 p.m. DS2021-48, Andria Leigh, Director, Development Services r... • Ensure land use planning policies manage change and promote economic activity that does not negatively impact the Township's natural heritage features and attributes. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed development is consistent with the Strategic Plan, as it will not negatively impact the Township's natural features and attributes. Consultations: Notice of this application was circulated to the public and to various review agencies and Township departments. A public notice sign was also posted on the subject lands. As of the preparation of this report, the following comments have been received: • Development Engineering — • Building — No Comments • Operation & Community Services — • NVCA — see letter dated March 25, 2021 Attachments: Schedule 1 : Location Map Schedule 2: Aerial Map Schedule 3: Proposed Boundary Adjustment Sketches Schedule 4: Draft Approved Plan of Subdivision - LPAT Decision October 30, 2019 Schedule 5: NVCA March 25, 2021 letter Conclusion: Based on Planning Staff's analysis of this application, it is recommended that Consent Applications 2021-B-15 and 2021-B-16 be approved subject to the conditions outlined in the recommendations, and on the basis that the application is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement 2020, conforms to the Growth Plan 2020, conforms to the Official Plans for the Township of Oro-Medonte and the County of Simcoe, complies with the criteria in Section 51(24) of the Planning Act and represents good planning. Respectfully submitted: Andria Leigh, RPP, Director Development Services Approvals: Date: Andria Leigh, Director of Development Services April 1 , 2021 Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-048 Page 7 of 14 Page 191 of 275 6.g) 7.00 p.m. DS2021-48, Andria Leigh, Director, Development Services r... Schedule 1 : Location Map 3691 ogeaaw.� 3 3691 7 3617 03615 3618 9 qao s K 3590 3586 3520 m r m C- m m 3555 3566 c CO 3536 6 3528 3524 3514 3507 3508 3510 3502 1764 3478 46 4$ 50ki 1922 1$9$ 1856 m m V O1236 4 60 2146 shoe Valley_R 1697 3145 Schedule 1 Location �'Iouf�fa � Subject Lands Proud Heritage,E—iti.g Future 0 aao m File Number:2021-B-15I16 Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-048 Page 8 of 14 Page 192 of 275 6.g) 7.00 p.m. DS2021-48, Andria Leigh, Director, Development Services r... Schedule 2 —Aerial Photo aseyRd�T T- h Jiu i w e w L i31 C 0.S tl) C Of a r: r 22 Horseshoe Valley Schedule 2 Aerial Photo �IOEUPP.SI7P�7 0 Subject Lands Proud Heritage,Exciting Future 0 300 m File Number=2021-B-15.+1f I P P 1 Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-048 Page 9 of 14 Page 193 of 275 6.g) 7.00 p.m. DS2021-48, Andria Leigh, Director, Development Services r... Schedule I Proposed Severance Sketches 2021-B-15 (Boundary Adjustment/Lot Addition)from 3555 Penetanguishene Road to 3507 Penetanguishene Road: LOT ADDITION .]fYb hMr�rVw+� •-sm rwnwww�.u+.r.. o.mu•:.�.w�ooraa+�ee. . Gvray u Smcme A .. .. 959A.yynpyr.py 4W v. it -.. .dvr�Maw.Yy _lCE+C �f�✓cFL Z■ r � � ��-Iw 51 1 .StM♦[4Ir5 S 9 — —a-rc{�-._ -.- NpA1565MOE YAl4�ll NOAQ� ••- + ��I,� �. Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-048 Page 10 of 14 Page 194 of 275 6.g) 7.00 p.m. DS2021-48, Andria Leigh, Director, Development Services r... Schedule I Proposed Severance Sketches 2021-B-16 (Boundary Adjustment/Lot Addition) from 3507 Penetanguishene Road to 3555 Penetanguishene Road: LOT AixITION vK�imtx -07 PenetaagulO—Road IF-P,ih tangulkm*Road - I nshippf©tC--j,tC 35SE Renetaaguishene Road 3i°3 - • wo i - 1 0': lands w ne Reta'red 01- .. �✓ 33g7 Penela[guurhane Raatl 3ry Nm seam raow � 5ubjr[lmds V L - _ _ f Q Ge�ur25ecm�ry Plan Boun�ry E LEDEND �,. � .,Ea,�..___..._ ___;_._._ .._.• m.]u ra^iesac xs. 0 u,a sc xrl 3FA]Pn�ingadene � O La[Gm. Y65]a3] L656ie�I Ip: xesemta dat�tob¢ISlar�ed W_ 2r W� j j feMsmhe Remind - - 3555 PtrwmtguishmrvRoetl '' �� tl Am =]39yfi0Gnti5]]]c) w o s �� Pm spxe 0 t 4d]i[im(fran 3�0]m 3555) s _ F Xv- Fmun F¢atlenw J - .�, tdm. .]SB.Ifid]m'L61TAec) \ - Rtl1°m' 1 9 b', - Wrteceuna e-d Wd . � oP.e&+•u ", -" l,nd.m � 1 --_. wood.d a® ae pe Remlmd j � i j Sarcr$ _ HORSESHOE VALLEY RDAD •• .- a. C@ ! " rIs 98Au tLLIPS wlPFmcpePL". Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-048 Page 11 of 14 Page 195 of 275 6.g) 7.00 p.m. DS2021-48, Andria Leigh, Director, Development Services r... Schedule 4- Draft Approved Plan of Subdivision (LPAT PL 171274 Decision October 30, 2019) RURAL/AGMCOLNRAL 1 SOUTH HALF L O T OFF .3 L 0 T 4 3 NORT iE P 3 E LF c �, L 0 T 4 2 i l 1 F r Z �•• , :` - L NEEDS GEED 13iOCK344 E f : IXher Inds 0— by Appr—pt SOUEH L 0 T 4 2 s 4 1 z RURAL/ACRCUL rL AL a a, �4CK321 � �, P\��• �� - X TTI RURAL/AGRICUL MRAL DRAFT PLAN KEY W SCHEOLILEOFIE—LBE BIIRVEYORSGERTIFCRTE —MML NFMR T— OF SUBDIVISION arm— C—ERS AUTHOR— Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-048 Page 12 of 14 Page 196 of 275 6.g) 7.00 p.m. DS2021-48, Andria Leigh, Director, Development Services r... Schedule 5- NVCA Correspondence pi `yt z; `t Nottawasaga Valley a� Conservation Authority ys� _ R�9TION A 25 March 2021 SENT VIA EMAIL Andy Karaiskakis, Secretary-Treasurer Township of Ora-Medonte 148 Line 7 South Oro-Medonte, ON LOL 2EO Re: Committee of Adjustment Application File #2021-B-15 &2021-B-16 3555 Penetanguishene Road and 3507 Penetanguishene Road Township of Oro-Medonte, County of Simcoe Dear Mr. Karaiskakis, NVCA staff have reviewed the above-noted applications for consent to sever to facilitate two boundary adjustments a the above noted parcels. NVCA staff have received and reviewed the following documents submitted with this application: Applicant's Site Plan (provided in circulation) NVCA staff have reviewed this application as per our delegated responsibility from the Province to represent provincial interests regarding natural hazards identified in Section 3.1 of the Provincial Policy Statement(PPS, 2020) and as a regulatory authority under Ontario Regulation 172/06. The application has also been reviewed through our role as a public body under the Planning Act as per our CA Board approved policies. Site Characteristics Existing mapping indicates that the subject property is regulated due to watercourse flood and erosion hazards associated with a reach of Matheson Creek. There is an mapped unevaluated wetland partially located on 3507 Penetanguishene Road, outside of the area subject to the above-noted applications. The sites are partially within the NVCA regulation limit due to the presence of these features. Delegated Responsibility and Statutory Comments: NVCA has reviewed the application through our delegated responsibility from the Province to represent provincial interests regarding natural hazards identified in Section 3.1 of the Provincial Policy Statement (PPS). 1. The proposed boundary adjustments have been demonstrated to be free of natural hazards through technical studies submitted in support of the Craighurst Land Corp. Plan of Subdivision. NVCA staff have reviewed and accepted the studies through due process. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with Section 3.1 of the PPS. NVCA has reviewed the application as per our responsibilities as a regulatory authority under Ontario Regulation 172/06. This regulation, made under Section 28 of the Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority 8195 e Line,Utopia,6N LOM 1T0 A member of Conservation Ontario T:705-424-1479 F:705-424-2115 admin@nvca.on.ca.nvca.on.ca Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-048 Page 13 of 14 Page 197 of 275 6.g) 7.00 p.m. DS2021-48, Andria Leigh, Director, Development Services r... Conservation Authorities Act, enables Conservation Authorities to regulate development in or adjacent to river or stream valleys, Great Lakes and inland lake shorelines, watercourses, hazardous lands and wetlands. Development taking place on the subject lands may require permission from the Conservation Authority to confirm that the control of flooding, erosion, dynamic beaches, pollution or the conservation of land are not affected. NVCA also regulates the alteration to or interference in any way with a watercourse or wetland. 2. The site is partially within the NVCA Regulation Limit and the proposed boundary adjustment have been demonstrated to not be within an area subject to the Authority's regulation (flood or erosion hazard). No development is proposed with the boundary adjustments therefore a permit is not required from the NVCA. Advisory Comments - Natural Heritage NVCA has reviewed the applications in accordance with the NVCA memorandum of understanding with the Township of Oro-Medonte to provide plan review on matters of natural heritage. Comments are presented in an advisory capacity as expert peer review. 3. NVCA notes that the part subject to the boundary adjustment does not contain any mapped natural heritage features. Summary The NVCA is satisfied from a watershed management perspective that the application is consistent with the natural heritage and hazard policies of the PPS, and in conformity with provincial and NVCA policy. Based on the above comments, it is the opinion of the NVCA that: • Consistency with Section 3.1 of the PPS has been demonstrated; • Ontario Regulation 172/06 applies to portions of the subject sites and a permit from the NVCA is required for development within the NVCA regulation limit. • NVCA is currently reviewing development of a proposed plan of subdivision and zoning by-law amendment 2003-SUB-01 and 2018-ZBA-02 on the retained lands. Matters related to development will be addressed through due process in the continued review of the subdivision application. Thank you for circulating this application and please forward a copy of any decisions. Sincerely, ub� Emma Perry Planner III Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-048 Page 14 of 14 Page 198 of 275 6.g) 7.00 p.m. DS2021-48, Andria Leigh, Director, Development Services r... From: McCartney, Garry<gmccartney@oro-medonte.ca> Sent: Friday, March 19, 2021 3:36 PM To: Falconi,Teresa <tfalconi@oro-medonte.ca> Subject: RE: Notice of Public Hearing- Development Services Committee Meeting, April 07, 2021 (2021- B-15) & (2021-B-16) Craighurst GP Building division has no comments at this time. Thanks Garry McCartney, CBO Page 199 of 275 6.g) 7.00 p.m. DS2021-48, Andria Leigh, Director, Development Services r... o Psac4 Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority TION A 25 March 2021 SENT VIA EMAIL Andy Karaiskakis, Secretary-Treasurer Township of Oro-Medonte 148 Line 7 South Oro-Medonte, ON LOL 2EO Re: Committee of Adjustment Application File #2021-B-15 & 2021-B-16 3555 Penetanguishene Road and 3507 Penetanguishene Road Township of Oro-Medonte, County of Simcoe Dear Mr. Karaiskakis, NVCA staff have reviewed the above-noted applications for consent to sever to facilitate two boundary adjustments a the above noted parcels. NVCA staff have received and reviewed the following documents submitted with this application: • Applicant's Site Plan (provided in circulation) NVCA staff have reviewed this application as per our delegated responsibility from the Province to represent provincial interests regarding natural hazards identified in Section 3.1 of the Provincial Policy Statement (PPS, 2020) and as a regulatory authority under Ontario Regulation 172/06. The application has also been reviewed through our role as a public body under the Planning Act as per our CA Board approved policies. Site Characteristics Existing mapping indicates that the subject property is regulated due to watercourse flood and erosion hazards associated with a reach of Matheson Creek. There is an mapped unevaluated wetland partially located on 3507 Penetanguishene Road, outside of the area subject to the above-noted applications. The sites are partially within the NVCA regulation limit due to the presence of these features. Delegated Responsibility and Statutory Comments: NVCA has reviewed the application through our delegated responsibility from the Province to represent provincial interests regarding natural hazards identified in Section 3.1 of the Provincial Policy Statement (PPS). 1. The proposed boundary adjustments have been demonstrated to be free of natural hazards through technical studies submitted in support of the Craighurst Land Corp. Plan of Subdivision. NVCA staff have reviewed and accepted the studies through due process. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with Section 3.1 of the PPS. NVCA has reviewed the application as per our responsibilities as a regulatory authority under Ontario Regulation 172/06. This regulation, made under Section 28 of the Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority 8195 8th Line, Utopia, ON LOM 1T0 A member of Conservation Ontario T: 705-424-1479 F: 705-424-2115 admin@nvca.on.ca 9 nvca.on.ca Page 200 of 275 6.g) 7.00 p.m. DS2021-48, Andria Leigh, Director, Development Services r... Conservation Authorities Act, enables Conservation Authorities to regulate development in or adjacent to river or stream valleys, Great Lakes and inland lake shorelines, watercourses, hazardous lands and wetlands. Development taking place on the subject lands may require permission from the Conservation Authority to confirm that the control of flooding, erosion, dynamic beaches, pollution or the conservation of land are not affected. NVCA also regulates the alteration to or interference in any way with a watercourse or wetland. 2. The site is partially within the NVCA Regulation Limit and the proposed boundary adjustment have been demonstrated to not be within an area subject to the Authority's regulation (flood or erosion hazard). No development is proposed with the boundary adjustments therefore a permit is not required from the NVCA. Advisory Comments - Natural Heritage NVCA has reviewed the applications in accordance with the NVCA memorandum of understanding with the Township of Oro-Medonte to provide plan review on matters of natural heritage. Comments are presented in an advisory capacity as expert peer review. 3. NVCA notes that the part subject to the boundary adjustment does not contain any mapped natural heritage features. Summary The NVCA is satisfied from a watershed management perspective that the application is consistent with the natural heritage and hazard policies of the PPS, and in conformity with provincial and NVCA policy. Based on the above comments, it is the opinion of the NVCA that: • Consistency with Section 3.1 of the PPS has been demonstrated; • Ontario Regulation 172/06 applies to portions of the subject sites and a permit from the NVCA is required for development within the NVCA regulation limit. • NVCA is currently reviewing development of a proposed plan of subdivision and zoning by-law amendment 2003-SUB-01 and 2018-ZBA-02 on the retained lands. Matters related to development will be addressed through due process in the continued review of the subdivision application. Thank you for circulating this application and please forward a copy of any decisions. Sincerely, Emma Perry Planner III Page 201 of 275 6.g) 7.00 p.m. DS2021-48, Andria Leigh, Director, Development Services r... The Corp, of the Township of Oro-Medonte 148 Line 7 S. Ora-Medonte, ON LOL 2EO March 28, 2021 Steve & Linda Watson 1784 Horseshoe Valley Rd W Barrie, ON L4M 4Y8 Pt. Lot 41 & Lot 42 Con 1 Oro Medonte Subject: Application 2021-B-15 & 2021-B-16 Craighurst GP Inc. We have concerns with the application for boundary adjustment for 2021-B-15. The adjustment to this property backs onto the north west corner of our property line. 1. In 2020 we allowed Craighurst GP Inc. to have access to our property and trails, which we have for our own use, to place test wells on the back east corner of their property line. In the fall of 2020, we had our property line surveyed by Dearden &Stanton and discovered that the test wells are right on our property line. During this test well process many new trails were made joining up with trails on our property. We noticed last fall and this past winter that many people walking, skiing, ATVs, snowshoeing and mountain biking onto our property coming from the back of the Craighurst GP property. People think that the trails are open to the public even though we have posted "No Trespassing" signs. If we have a problem now what will it be like when there are over 300 new homes. 2. The back-east corner of the Craighurst GP property should not be a development area due to being in the wetlands (MNRF) (NVCA) We feel that Craighurst GP should construct and maintain a adequate fence along that property line so that we can have our privacy respected. Regards Steve & Linda Watson 705-725-2234 Page 202 of 275 6.g) 7:00 p.m. DS2021-48„a 0fiaZ4�jg%Ql�ppW�t Ppyi� d iWvices r... 6g) Additional correspondence received The Corp. of the Township of Oro-Medonte 148 Line 7 S. Oro-Medonte, ON LOL2E0 April 7, 2021 Dave and Lynette Mader 3499 Penetanguishene Road Roll Number:434602000100901 Subject: Application 2021-B-15 & 2021-B-16 Craighurst GP Inc. As per the notice of public hearing, stating that written submissions can be made by emailing planning@oro-medonte.ca prior to or during the Public Hearing, we are submitting comments specific to Application 2021-B-16. We live in the residence immediately south of Block 343 Lands to be Retained. Our house sits between this property and the Presbyterian cemetery. Our property is zoned A/RU, and we have lived there for 19 years. We recognize and appreciate the township's thoughtful planning process through the adoption of a secondary plan that guides the development of Craighurst and protects its natural heritage features, including the east/west treed EP corridor that connects the two protected creek systems within the plan of subdivision.This corridor allows for wildlife movement and will provide a valued natural space to future residents. Consistent with our comments on the secondary plan many years ago,we hope that the township will require traffic calming measures on the road that transects the EP corridor to help reduce impacts to wildlife, and in support of public safety. Regarding Application 2021-B-16 specifically, we have no concerns with the application as it is proposed. A severance/conveyance in and of itself doesn't impact us in any way. We note that the parcel to be retained immediately adjacent/north of us will be rezoned from A/RU to residential and have a couple of questions: 1) how many lots are associated with the lands to be retained under 2021-B-16? 2) Is the parcel residential 1 or 2? Our only interest in this matter is working with the township and owner/future owner of the property next door to ensure that any future development does not negatively impact the value of our home or the quality of life we've enjoyed here. We thank Council and staff for the opportunity to comment and look forward to responses to our questions. Lynette & Dave Mader 705-817-1038 Page 203 of 275 6.g) 7.00 p.m. DS2021-48, Andria Leigh, Director, Development Services r... k w � o z 'N 1 ii�3� a1 1 N O I . U -p�auay5iri6ueYaua- � i � V u e a N j O ,� oM gyp ^ c� O — C6 0 � a� (u U O N Q U � .LOQ4-0 C CO a- Q xw L E � o Q _ O N �-' 4-0 r C: O O +r L to r to M }, U O � a) a) � � '� a- 04 - Q O CD N N x a O CU O w ^ - _0 a� CO a> o � 00E ao ._ V Ln }' M > i J M N = 0- cnw OU 0 Page 204 of 275 6.g) 7.00 p.m. DS2021-48, Andria Leigh, Director, Development Services r... s l,yw z 3 a, t M' JJI I W 1 , N O N CU pa:auaysln6'eyes t v � � u 0 a � � N N c C: O _ O •� � a)--; VU - Q U X N a) .� w _ E — O a) CO CO Q _ M a) Q �-. � �/ U U (u a) (/1 r }, a) O C a) cN 0' cn � � � 0 � . . U . . U `- a) 0) 0 0 ca a) cn .0 � � C: o oU) � v Cu 0 M JcCYi N° wwc� 0 010� 0 Page 205 of 275 6.g) 7.00 p.m. DS2021-48, Andria Leigh, Director, Development Services r... z t ^ MI 0- W O Q . ^ N U) a� O L U N }, 2 CO U 00 ' M ti � NM � Q C U) w U) V O 0 aDE � � _ E � � — � rn6 M � = CO n N to W Ln Q J N N � . . I r O N — 00 Cu o O � CV o �' Q) N O ) Z5 O •— CD O � }+ CU ._ — Cu Cu � U .— .2 7 a � - LO U) CL Cy') O N Cu a--� LO }+ N Cfl . 70 L6 CD (B N N (, ° w a O 0 � E � � U 0 Cu� CUooa) � oNo � O 70 N Q Cu � � C o � va) � OQZ) Page 206 of 275 6.g) 7.00 p.m. DS2021-48, Andria Leigh, Director, Development Services r... z U a) U) O a) a) C) m O CO 00 CO Co N CN � U)O ca � N v 0 a) a) Q in0 ti Cu a) 00 00 00 0 N m CD Q- r N � m a) o O r N N o N O U) OCU •� �••r �, (6 C10 00 CO U 2 - .� CO a) U L a) Q Q ~ CO O a) ++ }; E 22 ♦--+ a) CO 00 ^� 0 L6 W y E ~ CV O 0 V • . O 4 0 U O � L J p -0 a) Qc: D C: a -a LL Q D Page 207 of 275 6.g) 7.00 p.m. DS2021-48, Andria Leigh, Director, Development Services r... (n z Cu IGO E: t M� W t N O N U ' aN� O � ; � � 7 N ' O •� Cu �A A O o U o M a L Q Page 208 of 275 6.g) 7.00 p.m. DS2021-48, Andria Leigh, Director, Development Services r... o r d N C) - 1. 11010a1II I! HL N , Cu t I ^ M I..L N ' N O •— Cu Cu LO U O C ■� , r ! ` Ilk is l 1 U C �a CL CL a Page 209 of 275 6.g) 7-00 p.m. DS2021-48, Andria Leigh, Director, Development Services r o J M J 11 F- 4 Iff IGO O Cu Cu C) � O q � g 6 ,� CL FL U) C Page 210 of 275 6.g) 7.00 p.m. DS2021-48, Andria Leigh, Director, Development Services r... z O 3 a HGk-"S WL 1 Wd 0 9 I A�ji m ire O flue-nlc 1 N - i' it E� r E t � I � kid a�1 , m a— I V) O '•f f ¢..... r� 1fW Z �3 A } l° SFA1E }izir ZUJ` m Um n GA p P] W■AOB ANrilMi FF nu �vusix� Do P1 Q � r i O 0 N Page 211 of 275 6.g) 7.00 p.m. DS2n2l-AR A eigh, Dir, velopment Services r... 0 3 °+ E: t W � N O N y LO is C� U m � O U) N � Al +� C6 Cu � U E Y � f !i i lY^/ 'a Page 212 of 275 6.g) 7 , Director, Development Services r... w f 1 +A �yy 11111 L jt� MI - r O � r Cu _ LO U O - 04 #01" i O • CU 4+ U) 0 C) Page 213 of 275 6.g) 7.00 p.m. DS2021-48, Andria Leigh, Director, Development Services r... O O U C) .�J O +O C N C : w L � O N N � N .� O N a) .0 0 0 _ CSN U) L Cc: a) a) n C NLO O O O LO N N CD O M MO i M - N O) r 0 -0 M� (B O CD W O U N a) a) 0 W L�N O O M L E +J N N W" O O N L « L O L U N c O O O Ma O U) - L a) a) 0 U _ > � - O > M4 M4 0 a) L � Q ` O O CA > O y y N MN Q 0 aa)i M U) L) a) > rn .�3 � a > 2 Dow c � o - M u°i Opt N Lam.= oN rZ a) � c a) (q0s= _ ° _ o 3 a) d . U w c cts o CD N cis a) E = a- Q J a) Q � OpU xLO N "OM O E o a) 0-_ •— moo o 0) L °'- ELs a ■ sZ Mn c0 O O U N E r Q- Z C O) O �C U) � O r ° M U Mu CD � C a) U N M N O O -O M 0- ,a > M C ) a) O O � + N n a) = >, L __ N W O N �3 � a) U C U '� O = N ° ° 0 a) U '^ a) U) 0 V QOL a) . O U) 0- O � .� (0 + a) MZ a) a) - a fC O M Y/ O O N MB E -0 U) Q- O CN 4-0M N v, a) O L +` +J C L N O LL C) O L U) o o o a o . . a) > 04 47 E 0 a) - o " ALL E � � Q U r ° N a) >, a) .E a) MU) - a) > .N c 1 a) cts Q > �_ cis d U) -C �_ a) M a) ° o ° ° U I° a) -0 y CL1 NEB a) U � cZ � Mo a) oa) t r > X a M a) C L a) a) .N N O N EQti CD � a) 0a) E5 Mo oa) Qo c) Q aa)i oQ-LLO U) a) � MU)E: W � aa) _0 4EfEUC N U M CO - aN -0 "O a (B N N W) N O U N C i sZ a) C � Ma (B C N . ~> UN X UU) 06 2 � -0 C O U B QO � ° U � a O ° a) U MO O O O LO O O a) V) >V/J O - O Ca � M -0aN U) a) a) Z � a) ON° o(� aU) Qcts-Ui6— oU Q C� o 0) 0Qu)OB Qc O N a) O U) CI)z U U N c U) ° L O OC . a) U C ._ a) a) > 6' O U -0 C -0 B O B O ° . NN Q+J +J — Q O a) Q'' a) "O O MB a) O a) L O 0 Av+ U W . N ` � N M Ii N Page 214 of 275 6.g) 7.00 p.m. DS2021-48, Andria Leigh, Director, Development Services rCD ... CD o N w N p e L U 0 M U) N U ° O •U �o O U) C L ti ! _0 — (n a0 a) 'o 'o Y -6 N U D i MI O 2 M (B O (B "' O O W (B o O a) E > L O L In O U -0a) a� a) C LoNo p a� cc E � OL L N O .� U O C > O o M p -0 CCR � � O O O C .Q' U M (n = > -0 "O O O >' M M N o � a) Q 5 .L C a) O C O 0 0 (B o (B fn > +� a) O U) O L O O - (4 ns w � O y L fA N X (B 0 ._ a) O L Qi o M 3 c 0 o N > ULr) C m _ N 'U O a) N m QOMQ 0- o a� Q � o o U CU moo U - o �� E L °' Ewa U') ^ NO M � �� ° N U (�6 ° '� v N V ' N o � .c_ C > U L > > a) 0 0 +- N LJJ _ c� ° ° c� a, a� _ a� ° ° ° > ,� U '^ �_ N LO N C C C '� M U V0 = — N — = ° Q "O .� � r f4 _ Q O +J iCO - U 7 N Q N a) L O C I n O O U N C O U N Q U _ - 0 v' CLO N_ O L M ) > O O N O � LLC� O L fon N N i °N o o� C NN o (B (B Q U : °O' L o a� + cn U U) - ° Zmoro C ■ N ° Z �Q. o o ( a W Qro � W � -a a) o p owO a) o > LL C -0�U+ ♦v1 � ' 0 � pi M � E EE �c � 0) Cu ^ o co a) a,= o o CtoQ~ � a) C � o Q C o -p.E0 � 1 ENUo O N oho > = .MEa) � o � > (n � a U Ca) (a a) 0 — 0 C: z C N L.L °� E o > a? U � c Z o c� a) � o ° NE c`r' = o Qt � 0- ° L � ° o � qt w LU) c1 U0Q a) � - - i � E o -0M0)(— U)N 0U)7 i N 0 U o C N o r C/� ■� O o O 0 0 -° U d Q' o a) y Ln V J �� N (B (B C O Q 4) ) a) a) C (B (B � Q C M O Q U C o L (0 Q U O M O Oo O o M Q > (B Q- - o Q-(n a "U M L U � > a n Q � U � � w O C 7 U (B o f +J U M o U > o C L L = 0- - N C E CM)- 8- U Q. f4 O i o M L � AV U F- Ens ` N N � Ii N Page 215 of 275 Ta) DS2021-35, David Yauk, GIS Technician re: Planning Division Activit... /a Township off C.�` ,W Report Fraud Heritage, Exciting Future Report No. To: Prepared By: DS2021-035 Development Services Dave Yauk, GIS Technician Committee Meeting Date: Subject: Motion # April 7, 2021 Planning Division Activity Summary (Development Roll #: Applications, Planning, GIS, and R.M.S. File #: N/A Heritage Committee Projects) October 2020 - March 2021 Recommendation(s): Requires Action For Information Only It is recommended: 1 . That Report No. DS 2021-035 be received for information purposes and posted on the Township's website. Background: The purpose of this report is to provide Council with an update on Planning, GIS, and Heritage Committee projects that are underway within the Planning Division, as well as the current status of all development applications that are active within the Division. The attached summary (Attachment #1) reviews the status of Applications for: Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment, Plan of Subdivision, and Site Plan. In addition, the report provides the following summary: 1. The number of applications received and processed for: pre-consultation, minor variance, and consent in 2018, 2019, 2020 and 2021 to-date; and, 2. The number of zoning certificates and zoning certificate revisions received and processed in 2018, 2019, 2020 and 2021 to-date. The attachment also includes a list and description of some of the other Planning, GIS, and Heritage Committee projects underway. Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-035 Page 1 of 3 Page 216 of 275 7.a) DS2021-35, David Yauk, GIS Technician re: Planning Division Activit... Analysis: Development Applications Planning staff continue to receive new development applications for review and processing. In addition as required by Section E1 .1 of the Township Official Plan (Complete Application), Planning staff receive and review applications for pre-consultations and coordinate meetings with proponents, Township Staff and other agencies in advance of formal planning application submissions. Further, over the past several years there have been a high number of minor variance applications received by Township staff. However, it is anticipated that with the completion of an updated Official Plan and Zoning By-law, that number will reduce. Other Planning Projects The initial Open House for the Township's Official Plan Review process was held on June 20, 2018. The dedicated website for the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Review process is live and continues to receive public comments. The Township's Consultant has prepared draft Vision Statements (available on the website) with a Directions Report anticipated to be available for public consultation/input in 2020. An updated staff report (DS2020-086) and timeline for completion of the Comprehensive Official Plan Review and Zoning By-law Update was presented and approved at the October 14, 2020 Council meeting. The Township's Consultant has prepared a first draft of Official Plan policies, which Planning Staff have reviewed and provided comments to the Consultant. A second draft of the Official Plan policies is to be submitted to Staff for review by March 31, 2021 . GIS Projects GIS has been directly involved in a number of new Township-wide projects including: the Employment Land Strategy, Connect Oro-Medonte (internet advocacy and initiatives) and the new Official Plan & Zoning By-law. By providing mapping and GIS analyst services in-house, the Township was able to select proposals for these projects that saved unnecessary spending on these particular types of services and contributed to greater overall efficiency and collaboration where these projects crossed departments. Additionally, the development and implementation of mobile data collection/reporting tools, as well as other web-based GIS resources, continues to contribute to the Township's successful decentralization of much of its workforce during the pandemic. Heritage Committee Projects Due to the restrictions on public gatherings as a result of Covid-19, the meetings have been infrequent with the last Heritage Committee Meeting occurring on November 16, 2020. A report and associated by-law will be presented for Council's consideration to designate the Old Town Hall and Cenotaph located at 833 Line 7 North on March 24t", 2021. Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-035 Page 2 of 3 Page 217 of 275 7.a) DS2021-35, David Yauk, GIS Technician re: Planning Division Activit... Financial / Legal Implications / Risk Management: N/A Policies/Legislation: • Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13 • Ontario Heritage Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. 0.18 Corporate Strategic Goals: Planning Staff is of the opinion that these applications are consistent with the following Strategic Goal of the Township: Balanced Growth: • Ensure land use planning policies manage change and promote economic activity that does not negatively impact the Township's natural heritage features and attributes. Consultations: • Planning Division staff Attachments: Attachment #1- Planning Division Activity Summary (Development Application Status, Planning, GIS and Heritage Committee Projects) April 2021 Conclusion: This report is intended to provide an information update for Council and staff regarding the current status/summary of all applications received by the Planning Division and the various Planning, GIS and Heritage Committee projects underway in the Division. This report including the attachment, once received by Council, will be posted on the Township's website to provide the public with the up to date activity summary. Respectfully submitted: Dave Yauk, GIS Technician Approvals: Date: Derek Witlib, Manager Planning Services April 1, 2021 Andria Leigh, Director Development Services April 1, 2021 Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-035 Page 3 of 3 Page 218 of 275 7.a) DS2021-35, David Yauk, GIS Technician re: Planning Division Activit... C� Cn CL O L 'i � L /A O L y-+ O O Cu -+ .0 CO Q CU Cu Q N U to t � •L � ti Z O G� Q O Cu Q Q o Q 'L J V N > _ CO m Cu 0 (Q U-) CD C C _ 06 y O w t C Cu c c E Q m T w oN o V m U >N Q X Cu ++ m LU O i U) c S N — 2 Cu E .O M y 2 a) inr- N o cn E : O Q od ' N � E �� cc " °� _ O m _ EOM , 0 L 0) V O w U a Q N O CL E Cu L a) 0) Cu E i to in („) ZM CJ � 'U 'U 7L O CU Q O Q a 0 U- A 0 CV O (n (5 N Q a_ W LL Page 219 of 275 7.a) DS2021-35, David Yauk, GIS Technician re: Planning Division Activit... ei- i U) �' E O U) O to N C: L ram+ C p 0 Cu O cB U 0) Cu a) o O U O N L 0) Cu p p U O) M O Cu cu o Cu CV CU > > CV a) m E Q Q D O 7 O �_ 0 C 7 O Q � J N > a) � � J J to L L _ Cu cB O Cu Cu CF) O Cu cn '0) Q C L Cu U O - E L o O O 17. E cn O _0 Q O Cu Cu Zvi 70 U- o D E (n O >+ to X U Cu 00 U U) Cu -0 a) U) Cu _0 C D O L C O Q .> Cu U N 2 C N > p _j a NU-Cu E C Cu p � (n X U c Q c � 0 O U ov Q m m C W O O Q O a) � +� E c O L Cu (Q (n L M N L y L 0 Z O� +�+ U .� U U CU Z C m •V Cu �7 •V O Q m o 3 ;� a) 3 ti Cu a > E O � Cn � QO ii � ON Cn <m 0QD ° Page 220 of 275 7.a) DS2021-35, David Yauk, GIS Technician re: Planning Division Activit... >< r Qe� a ,.a IV 70 70 L O -0 O E 2 Q .Q y; O C cQ /0 0 0 � C D- o O O Z a) 70LL > C) O to L O U) W N L O N U O N O a) Z 6i CuU) E L V � O_ a) Cu Q O CO CU U C: 0 a) v � O V ccB U O Q _ Cu Cu Cu a) ZvU 0 � CCU -0 �O o U)O C oO U) �� 0 QO — � O C a)o Eo JD_ 0 U C Q E cB J D_ M U � � Cu U c a) L Q L = C 2 (n Q� O O U O Cu D_ C a) \ O O)� C C Q E U .0 m L N N C O 'V a) OL -0 C Q•(n a) O L O 0 .: C L � � oCu BEN � o L Cu + _0 m c6Em0 .2 0_ d) O 0 O a OU M C U) to w L •1 0) C cB C Q � U � a) C m � Cu y � ( LEUOO NO NOD ° � m Cu JJ r _ L O a) � � cII � Q � � � cn N �^ � ' Q`�Cu QL UocuE � O c0 E > � > O E 0- Q� w QU�)� O � �� c O o QNO O � N U� L N N L O L O O L O N LL fn L Cu Z a) a) a) " L Z o- a) 5 � C O � o- U �_ E � ti L CO cfl i O Cu L a (B L Cu N �_ 3 O � D_ Q 0 G) ) Q 00 3 0 4 , c� o Lo O •- x CL 0- LLNN 02 =U) a) wU) SON IlNU) OU fn0 a) Cu wU) Cu Page 221 of 275 7.a) DS2021-35, David Yauk, GIS Technician re: Planning Division Activit... f Na l Cu A U \ 0 Q BC') \ ?Q�z w 0 D O� C O U .L c= M Cu o CU L D m C U Cu70 = O O (n J a) a moo 0 Cu C m mC) U C E N � U Q J ' O � EOM p Q O 0 Cu 0U 'U (n O U CU C Cu CCNa_ 0 N to 0_ .� + O 0OJN Cu .L C �_ Q � -O •U N O L O �L CQ UU "� � � O y 0 C L _j Q Q y Q U O N L >+ c co D_ _ _0 0 CucB cB O O �_ Q O Q �_ C -0 � a) O Cu ru O U U1 W u Q to 0) w U1 a) Cu Q- Cu J � — 5 M Q c c c � E -0 Cu a) 4? Q J a- M U U U CU J � U E — O M B 0 QO (B "= O L V � ti � � Q 0_ 0 — N C 0)O O 0) Q •V � O � ~C° U °' p � OCN a] Cu c O� 0 •cO ° Z: Uo � N o _0 CB N `� 002 . O > C O U�) J cB Q � � E am `- � >,U N o C � � m a) 64 � oE -00 o E � 0 CUNT o > a) m � � m �o � ° o O lfi O ° c a) 'tn N E m c E a, aQ o Sa) 0 0 EQ c � � U o o EmO c Lod CO cB ^ � Em c oiSm �' � E � N U) to m o L Cu _ N m � to m > �m .L o Z 0O M 4 .0 U C .� — Z o0 C 7 a) O Cu ,� L a� O 3 cB is c Q Cc c T 0 Q C ai O Cu ii (NCNOUci� � � N � Q2 O iicj OH U) NCO 0-Cu (A2 Page 222 of 275 7.a) DS2021-35, David Yauk, GIS Technician re: Planning Division Activit... CO m 7° U Q VI�Q ti,� Q 0 �m� r 0 L n I C) LO Q V Q O a) L O CO - U) O O �I, AIL^, ✓ W L U t 0^, � UM Cu ' 0 W W (B Q Q W � N 'Z O V (U U z O M•Q N LO } U U to C O (Q 0-6 0 0 O — a) O v) a) O a) cB N Q N 0 C) 0- U L70 4- (u 0 0 N iJ 0) U > �+ D a) 70 0 >, U v- J �+ C 70 O — c N > 0- a--� a N 0 0 M C) a) L ' L 0 a) 0- M U Q 0 0 0 +, LO mCO -W Na) to Q a_ CO M CO U L a) O C COQ U a) m +' 0 0- a) ai to J H U 0)� U H J W O �- 0 0 N 0) Q o Q V — Z 0 C) O)T d L 70 .� � O U U 0 0 L N �_ O = 0) C: 0 W L L O L >1 •U U ' (Q m a) N () �O (B 0 0 0 0 to 0 � a) o � -0 � o L c� UQ Q m o �)N U CI4 m m � � aioU0o 0 °Q 0O CO (D . -0N cBQN N Q I >, y--i a) (B m a) O O) Q D- m U m cB N 0 to L } Q � m� mN CU oN _0 m m m L to C> � >, 0 0) L — } i N a) C) ,o o �j m Q m —Mz .L0o �0 C 0 � � 0 � 0a m (D N L cn N v L U o cN = � O L 0 N m m o L 0 C — 0 3 0 0 0 m � Sri - 0 3 0 Qx >, M L o c, Il cal O f— fn U N � -, CO N E LL C14 O � 0) < a) -0 U a 0- U) 0- Page 223 of 275 7.a) DS2021-35, David Yauk, GIS Technician re: Planning Division Activit77U�Fi ... J LO CO 3 v"� s - I r i M ^ N O L CCu O O O E _0 U Q a O C O U O 06 > O Cu M Q U OE Cu Cu (B m N O 7 N 7 J O J Cu0 CO a O O 2 0 0 U H O U 0 c U CU CU _ (II ' O O 0) - O� Cu N 70 CU COO X oN C � -0 m m cU = E Cu O 2 -0 N LL _r_ >, C > U 0 O O . -0o `- cB P' E U m U +�+ to O Cu w a)U) Q O OCu Q N ' O E Q _0 E (Q O L N O "-Cu E CL U (B L (Q CO U CV V O Q 0 Q Q Cu () 0) (B Q N O C ' 'L cU N O •� O Z CY) NU Z O G) Q Cu gO3 �Ii cNI N O c� fn 0- w Q E U- CN O cn i cn Page 224 of 275 7.a) DS2021-35, David Yauk, GIS Technician re: Planning Division Activit... 3 A��s M ti N 70 > 70 C cn C O Cu 0 Cu iCm O O Q O C O a Cu 0 O U) N U C) — I` O O O N to + C) Cu 5 �J C L 0) v cN o C N C O _0 CuCU Oca J Cu Up _ > C *CC C w0 0 C to a) cE pCL pj C; MN >Qa O 0)�p p Cm 0) u U �a_ U CD C CU O CuJ U o CS UU L C — Q O 2 a p C O p •> O p N to � 0 � m 0 70 i to N O M p i U N Cu Cu � i N C i _0 > -0 (Q C +�+ O N to +�+ E O Cu O _ O C �' 0)- Q V C C �D/ L O 0 ��. � � N � O Cu O N L OO X E 3 (.� (B L O7 r W E 'O � � V G� O 06 O Q p G� O O O 0 Q p � U O � CO O O m E m Cu 06 ° C E COa 06 m _0 L v Z N C D N � .L C Z N U) N Cm > .L O O� r +m+ — a D O) M C cB OL a mo Cu3 m � o0 3 � a >' 0C-Cu LLCM 02 NQ � Q LLCNCV OW fnmN w 0 W (n Page 225 of 275 7.a) DS2021-35, David Yauk, GIS Technician re: Planning Division Activit... r � e� of O ►� u �ts ��'d Y T S-46-au s L1'FIR m -14 lie '\ Y �y , i�'�� 1 •an�r a;;ol�4u��. and 0 U Cu O O E 75 U Y N � CO O � cj Q O 06 C L S O QN E . M V �+ > .V �+ D_ U) OU J J a) C V 0 0 0 0 0 Cu Cu 0 to > E c- L OL C C O JCu 0 Cu U � J O cU u E 0 c 0 o O c14 a) C� Cu O U O 0) N ,� N Cu o X N 0 °to C14 Q N m m c -0 z Cu (n 0 E (n U = o _0 _0 (D m m Q ( U- Cu c _0 w Cu c _0 cn 75 . O E � 0 � �.� G' � 0 L O `J O 0 a) 000) OC ( L Qc(QB O.. O � Z 0 O Cu m 0 Q m EE 06 � CO OO LU Cu N p (n ON Cu Z - � U ZO O u .2 U " C Z c CND_ N � 0-i0 O n wQ iN O5Uuw Page 226 of 275 7.a) DS2021-35, David Yauk, GIS Technician re: Planning Division Activit... CX Ca playpU •till...` � \ M � U ° Cu U E O ° U _0 N C r CO C a) O � U O E J Cu O CO CuQ C O Cu Q i 0_ 0- 0 O C FL Cu 0lf) C 'n C � C � (Q C O }+ U ( FL O)Q _ c > O OU '0 0) U N >-Fu co . Cu 0 T 'E u> > C 0 a) co U � N ~ � 0 0) 5 ° Cu J ° UCH o � o 7 (n a) N (B O U U_ N L 0) 0- C) Cm C Q CV C 2 ° CU M O O O.0 U O •— E N C V a) - U Q U- 0 0) U C Z 7 C +�+ ° U to2 > C L �_ C CuC O � � C U Cu ° O E O_ Cu a)N O) .y.. L E � +' O � � ,0 w U m Cua ° mo O > N Q � E U C ._ E m O Cd c E m -� c J � ° O °O cN U CuCum C O NZ O `� o C E� UU U U- OCV O N 0- Q Q U- OCV U) O (5 fn Q Q 0- U Page 227 of 275 7.a) DS2021-35, David Yauk, GIS Technician re: Planning Division Activit... Is . 1. aU i ~' o� v� S-44-aW.- ! 4,:�-O 0 CLI='' u1 N 'i any a}}01J u� R Ul OA 'qq O U M 0 O 0_ 0 N O } Cn O Cn O N O J N p 06 cn N p I— O L E :F+ N CO p E Q U U V �+ Q_ Cn OU t� O }' O X to O C (U C: U_ N CO C � (U � J +m > CL � � m O O p = CO Fu O to > E Q Fu z to m U o U U Q � O U - O S= Q �O N CO (1 U C CB O C a) SZ O N p N (U (U C) E N U U } C= a) N N CO a- `F= (U f° `- m a) N � _ Cn CA a) CA �_ (U LL CO } 0 70 C O C - S= C a) CU c CU I E L O p 70 .-. (Q vO- OU D O to _ to _ L C) m .S_ V (Q i N a) 0 0 E m m � m E m 0 od E g g o) N L m 70 N L_ CO N L G N N m L S_ Z .V .V Z ' -2 = � .V S= CU ON 3 Y -0Q (V N C > m N Q C= I1Cu � 00 � Ufno_ � Q LLN °' Oo Cl) f- Qw0- Page 228 of 275 7.a) DS2021-35, David Yauk, GIS Technician re: Planning Division Activit... p� , i L CO N (D LO E E > N a) O I-- U 0 CO O J O U j f— (n (n .L L .CL O Q 0 O O 0 N a 00 = 00 ULO Z to to N O Q q O O a1� � q O 0 a) > J � UCH N o � � � m O N J 0 O L oN NO 0 O) N C ti U J TTO ^L, E^' Q _ L 1 W W Q E0 Q O 0- 0 U Z > 0 > fn O O O U 0 0 N E 70 (B Q + L Q Q j E O O _ + C (,� O i N N 00 (0 (Q E Q o m o m 0 E Q r- 70 0 L O N N i� O N L (B (II zT i� 0 Z O U N . N N 0 CN m 3 � a � s� mN 3 0cn ii � O0 ci� � m of °' Win iiN O -) CO <w Ow E Page 229 of 275 7.a) DS2021-35, David Yauk, GIS Technician re: Planning Division Activit... Pag' Virg f0 � \ c m 70 Cu L CY) C _ CO E o m m m a) 0 0) O � O� CN U 0 Q O U E Q - 0)' cU O � L C j OM J 0 � O� a) V "- O i J L i J O QN U m 06 +W C a) L a) co W y N r Cu 0 70 D a) O L = a) = a) C O a) in L � O L CU c �Cu 3 E o_ m 0 � v o � U -0 a7 cB o � -j C O C cn a) U m 3 O w c m L O = CO 0) Cu JW � UH O JW � U Cu L a) OCOQ U c3) (B > C Q L . Cu L m 0 C � �j0 E Cu 0 ti O Q Q Q ti 0 O C L cB O O cB O m O L U ° = NCD O N � > o 0- CN CU c _0 _0 m � O O C Q C (A O L O NC NO LC O a2 E ONa) a) EDN (D O N CuN (A .0 ,gip U � U QU) c .0 ,� � U mm 00 1 Cu Cu G Ern � � oiS70 � aa) Cu Ern ooiS � aEiaNLu N m M _ O 0 R3 CO O U a) W E E U- It 0M0N LL O W W W � U a It N Q CI) 0- L Page 230 of 275 7.a) DS2021-35, David Yauk, GIS Technician re: Planning Division Activit... �i�� 'bSy e�o�• a w N�. ceG �s Q y0 Zr IN- 7 ne 6' °y�� ,ova©od •(<�- o-� m Cu 0O O E cn cn o 0 ni c O > c� _0 ° ~ 0 Cu Cu o O L Q O O cU Cu x U L m m 0 a) m E Cu _ � �_ o > — m V O .V �, O Cu 0 cc > > �, Cu a) ca 0 N > L ra O y !EcB 0 i c O cB 0- C 0 2 L Q "� r+ 70 J0_Cu V 0) Cu x c \ a) cv Cu O a O U Z U Cu 0- L O L a- Q () C ON N � V -0Q Cu O E O +—; O L C -r J O C V Q v7 LL Cu CO a) c .— a) D7 Q� O _0 0 C 0 _0 a) = "= _ Cu L CO C _0 L s O U Cu D o E o o M CU U r J C C C O = NO O 06 E — O> O = N •L to E O Q a) � iN (Q O E (II Q +r N L (V m 2 E ' Cr oO `° 70 U C Q o L o o c 0 .� Q c c m 0 U E CO c O O Ca .2 c )Cu -0 Ern LU m 'a ov a) L fn Cu E = L r ( L t� y to O m Z C +�+ .� 'U +O— ZCU 0 C N 0) " a) .0 " i 41 � ?� O � ca O (Q 0 Q a) 3 a) cc � U c Il i 0 2 � fn cV 70 � Q (A Il i 0 � 2 U) CO � U) m Page 231 of 275 7.a) DS2021-35, David Yauk, GIS Technician re: Planning Division Activit... \ ti` Ill i O V' h� v Ne yd cP LO 0 6i E CU o Q ui E J Cu � Q ° Q 0 o o cis — L sr Cu0 O C ° to U pp > O -W cis U 0) O C i Q VCu CO C) �+ N Q V 4 ' U Q a) ° O = N Cu y = N to U s� O M �_ N C yam+ C L Cu CuLCu JJ06CO0 Cu 0 Cu 0 �OC) � ID � CO 4— E C O p > N N C i _0 O -0 (D CO 0) Q O (D U C N Q O 3: O - > 0)_ Cu (u O L N C J > U N C O a) 2 Cu W C Q U C C to Q C CY) Cu C G) uj O _ E Q E + U _ O O O O N •� LL E (B C �+ i y N `� L E �+ N O_ Cu 0O O D U C cn Q � O U Cu E '' Q. Elm c L o6 � � `~ c � ? � s= p oa asp N U � cis m � � i0 N70 i Z G) 3 0 '� U Z to mo °r° 3 'CU CurnQ -0 m Q mo - 3 � a LL CN CNCN O U fn M -j m W < Il OC,4 O N fn � � � m Page 232 of 275 7.a) DS2021-35, David Yauk, GIS Technician re: Planning Division Activit... // Ilk s� o 0 0) O Cu Q L U O to =3 L U O C Mn O L CV O Cu L _0 � O 5 >% 05(n 5 70 Cu O C to .7 0) U U "- c O O O U O Cu Fn Cu j � U � U (Q (n Q cB - L U � O N > p Cu N 2 (ten Cu CO Cu G� CU O (u 4- >N p O (B Q c J0- U 0) C J > 0 0OCV E L (n O L O (n L 70 Cu E � a) O O) O C Q (II O L C O O > V O O U) U a) a) Q CU -0 E > � c m V O O O N �� O .� U U CO +�+ Q O (B +�+ (n j > O � c- O L O EO iO+ a)(n ( � `t L06 E Cu (n EU �0 Cm O O CU to (n L C y L L v J L CO N U L (B Z 41 r_ O Z 0 CN (n mo aCU W mo ro a�i c��a L aCU -0 iiN OY � ci� C3) iiCN 0 °r° C� v) � 0 C3 0 (n Page 233 of 275 7.a) DS2021-35, David Yauk, GIS Technician re: Planning Division Activit... �Na ?Nc, ° O N 70 ru C C O C N O U .O a) L O E `� cn 0- O U O O a) 2 -0C C 75 ° Cu > U Q.� E O _ N -2 O ^ O) Cr a)'t C O Cu pF) - E 06 p � C U C p O O) CU O J C�fl Cu }' U 06 c O QU �_ v L 0 C C Q (O c0 O u 0) p Cc Cu C a) _r_ -0 O cB U Q O O C CuA 0) O O Cu O = U _0 p OCu O to O p - L C QCto LC C C L 0 a) ON O ° Q7 U Q Z O)•D) U Cu ° ONL Cu ) " C > Cu Q•_0O C � L O U N U) �U L — C LU = C Cu C S O C C O 41 O O a) p -0 N 0 0 to 06 n u o E N U O 4 �-^ cB v O o O m 0 ° Cu Q E o N U) 2 0 c Cm X Q x m m CO p � U C � (A Q Q � mQ `� 0 -0 cB � Q L /��//�� /� w od p � � V a�i � ��/� �D/_� r = c Ca C O C p � o v/ L v/ .7C: n U L v/ v/ L (/� � L •L L Z p 3 O O � .� Z G) C O m Q +� D_ p 0 � 0 3CO m� ° °� -0E ° 0)0rnc � O �U- CNOU- N O U) , 'n to O AI Page 234 of 275 7.a) DS2021-35, David Yauk, GIS Technician re: Planning Division Activit... UI i� O � O I +� x N U + N O 0 to N O O N C) cn U o O ti u) CO cn 2 ti L J 0 Q � ; C r F E Q O .2 Q _ >, C> a �' 0_ i V N �+ 0- CO CO _ + Q _ O �_ p Q J0- J0U �n O J0- U 0 � CO O Q M � E p O 0 O to U > N N N � 70 C CO �O CO OU _0 •� v C 0- _0 O J CO (Q N Q CO m +� N L to CO N to m _0 _0 U cn N N 7070 C N +� i J = N O J = N L = ai L p U p (n N O E +� N p N N U) L + N L p N L ca 0 m cn v E cy, E o v U O > O (Q CQ Q L O O CO N O gym - m U O � m -0m �° O 0 Q L � Ln (n4) a, (n N i N > N .L = (/� E tOLn QC (� S7 Z N C O p +�+ Q > LL C j 4- 0 I fn (n OU � CO LL ON 0 Cf) 0- Page 235 of 275 7.a) DS2021-35, David Yauk, GIS Technician re: Planning Division Activit... O T( � � C A M L M +' 0 U « N n♦ cV N L >J VUJ 0- 0- 0f C: Q 0 > N cYi CO o C:) D 0 (n Q ci o - o M (v O O N M Z CVO Q 0 (D U N C0 O (n M N UU ^ o op a) Q L (D L c o m CO c� ^ � m 0-� o oLri �0 E m o � � o o � 0) cn E c cB CL O J IT M O to �_ O a) U O to 0 = a) N N } N U) 0 O M (Q LCO 0 j � L (9 ( L ' M > � U � to O(D 00 � 0 N5 JOJ W > J U E _0 U U E i= +EN (llO (D'> Y U(ll N 0 0 0- 0 0) t= (n Q +� (Q M S= t= Q M > O L (B L 0 CO 0 a) Y (D 0 N a) O (D '> U L O O 0 O ,0) W Q L E � Q m W (n L C 0 N N A 0- 0 w (Q (B ^, -0 L M W N _0 O O (D (� O C O 0 c Cn E N % N O N N +� O (D M N U L — d L N +_ 04 p E L s= Cn }' i N E — o o o (ten oU0 m oQ o mo a) 00 E L � m — V � � Eoo � � } M � m — 0 V � cB0 Ep — � Cac� c� Q � � Ym � � Ep — � °ems= � Qmo L > > i CO Cn L to 0 0 L C= Z 0- 0 O L U 0 Z CU �_ O U E �7 tV 3 O (u (Q CZ CZ- L tV m 0 CO U U- C14 o W CO CO CO Z3 CO LL ON 0 cn v� 0_ CO Page 236 of 275 7.a) DS2021-35, David Yauk, GIS Technician re: Planning Division Activit... c U � O L cII _ O E O O C E 2 to 0_ O O •0 O 0- 0) O O J a O U o D �' C) -0 ° rn O O U) N O O cII O Cu - > O . .L cB C -0 U 0_ O N 0 CU X C O to ate, > �_ to O O -0L cII -0 0 > O cII U N > N i Cu "- O U C C O 0 0 cII 0 G� O O C 0 C E O Q � U U — CO a) cu m70Q E cB � C L L O 2 cII O O L U O Q O L Q.� N � O 0 "- Eo Cu a _0 am � O � � J COL � Cu O O U C L N O Cu i =3 Cu C N ) N O O E U O D _ O U N m CO >' s C C C 2 Cu > O O O E zs am O — 2 O Q N E '(n � E E 0-OQ � p > 0Ln -0 E V O L �O w 0 U N 5 O Q U O Q N m C O -0 U Q to U) O Z U1 � CO C 7 OIL 7 � � � � L CU O CuN � O O G) L L U- CN 02 cna_ E Cu wH Cu Page 237 of 275 7.a) DS2021-35, David Yauk, GIS Technician re: Planning Division Activit... s Q E OL O O E > O O U C Q0 _0 U 0 Q Cu N C C C C � L + U c 06 a? Cu 0_ > to .N Q . Cu y O J c0 O Q p J w 7 Q O �_ O 7 E c Cu c U o J � U � JCu UH Cu _0 p O U o o vi L O cB NO O N X N 0 Cu c o o D m 0) Q o U D c O Q Cu O c 7 cl i c o m >'o O o 2 N L E U > N N N L 2 -0 L O O (,� v L O C C (.� (B � m ,� O U � Q cB � m ,� O (� m Q o E od a C -0 E -o � f`) otS E c 7 (n L 0) N 5 0) L Cu E M U) O L CO N L (U Z G� M �_ ,V O Z N O) U '� U � � � �j (n0 � QQ 4 � � Q � � O - Q O 3 O Q O = O m 3 C.p 4+ Z) G) Q LLN O QU) LLN N ON fn0- W Q Page 238 of 275 7.a) DS2021-35, David Yauk, GIS Technician re: Planning Division Activit... /Q' � onnt��aa8 a "o IIAd)PAjS aoysaS off W O'�lQVTl.i .c' sNe c Cu 0 0- 0 T 0 = � CO N t/j U to +� Uj C U �_ C U a) O N O O L O O 70 7 i 'L U W � U m 'i C 'L '� L Cu U OJ =� L O E a) E t � m a) ai O _ 2 Cu _0 J W D U U � J W V L n Cu m m E Cu c (DE o a)0 0 (D o a)ai L N L a) o) U) 0) 70 Q U Cu Q CCu � �,N Cu N o o (D Cu � N Cu a) > O OL C E � (3) O E L c a) O a) O a) U E m O D -E (b oU O Z) m E � = cI-),O 0 X N Q XO O �> Q Cu a) O a) C"j o E Oi U) L a) y CU � L L U) L O t� E L L EL z U FL '� o z a) C a) 3 mo 3 m �a °' -0 m °) 0 3: O � � X m O U C,wn w 0 LL N 0 U) —Cn W Q a) w 0 Page 239 of 275 7.a) DS2021-35, David Yauk, GIS Technician re: Planning Division Activit... f f Cu0 o Z Cu U L U tQ O � i •- - i 0 Q 2 0 CuQL Q to U 0 Cu J L 0 C L _0 U 0 0 -0 0 E N C U 0) (II C CN i Cu ' 0) to 0 Cu 70 Cu 7D -0 0 .0 �' U O .0 C U LCu C N C C Cu L Cu N W tBCU O U cB LO N v — - = C to V- cB 0 0 U 0)� O Q (B _ 0 0) 0 � O O 06 C CV CU C (VD r L O Cu O 0 U_ Cu a- 0 m O O O O C JM �UD_ 70 _ O -0 Q L L O C tll > C CU Cu 0-, C Q U O C O D Cu -0 Q to fn Q O 0 CU - D_ N -0 (B O CU (� a) CU O O p = to O � C "= U L (D (Q C O 0 E O O C C to 5 U) _0 > cB 0) Cu+�+ Q C O .Q L U Q "- 0) m E r- E c c C) tB N E E O E O O 0 (n O E O iO J 0 �_ C� Cu V to i � (L6 0 0 0 � U J � O 0) tB = Q O c O U 0) Q L 0 0 C U .— C w Q c — U -0 to 0 M �, a) Q p L � 0 C � °d (D c LSE � � I E � � � Cu °� Z � � m � � E 2 U .v '� •21 Z ' � M , � Cu E N_ C Lam+ E C i 4_ CO (n �, U �"= O � p 3C) 0 Q � Q � p � (`� � m > O tB U L ii (� O � .� cn U '� o_ tB � Q ii c� 0 0 CI) 2 U m Page 240 of 275 7.a) DS2021-35, David Yauk, GIS Technician re: Planning Division Activit... u) T Rd. t Cu Cu Cu C U += U p CO Q U O (3) N (B C CnCu C J 0 C) "r Z C) 70 0)C Q L to C Q (Q LU O O Cu CO C O Cu L C U O N O L U 0 C CN C C O C — U > � Cu .� w E 0 0 .v � c o �' E 70 U J > 0 0 U Cu 0 0 • _ � U- C) cC QC � 0Mc 0 Ec CD N O D _0 U � O U � O J � � UC� CO - a cB U J Q O C 0 � Q 0 U) 0 O O Cu Cu O C O) Q E V O U C O U N Q 0 0- _0 � _0 O = CU (n 0 (B (n ~ +Cn O U) C D (o >+ N C 0 Cu E 0 -0 C w E � O D U (n C —, -0 0 a) (n S E C }, •_ _ L 00 O 0 -5O V U i L M 2 O Cu V Q Q 0700 O N to L C ja L M C (n yL., rr L Cu U L Z4' � ' (B to U � .V O .V Z � � �7 ,� 0O O i Cu a Q cc Cr Q mo 3Q � IU � L m _ 0 0 mo 3 0Cu � 0 �, LL N O M C 7 V� Q Z (II LL N O W (n w Page 241 of 275 7.a) DS2021-35, David Yauk, GIS Technician re: Planning Division Activit... ` aes PIO M � i o � N O Q E O O J Cu J 0 0_ 4- O Cu N U) OU O a N O N ° O -0 0 y(D OL �+ � ° ^ "— Z CO E O • a)co cn "- U 'o w w CU ccU-) N _0 D �_ CO � � (n o � � LO0 00 �� 0 0 � m "� o J E Cu � U U U' O J U U O p O L O Cu m m °) 1.E ° N Q C 0 Cu a) � N _0 O O O Q O to O L _0 O O -01 Cu Cu +�+ 0 +y+ �O ,V Cu C OCu E Q C E C '� C Q N O �. E O O cB O CO EC ' (Q C..) Q Q Q' � . �� C Q Cu Q C OL.0 Ca Z G� O +� Z 41 N y U U 0 .2 7 7 ,� O 7 ._ �7 ._ 30 � m � Cu � `�° 3 � CO � 0Cu ii � CO O CR a U)U) o ii � O F ;51< w Q° w Page 242 of 275 7.a) DS2021-35, David Yauk, GIS Technician re- Planning Division Activit... +0d IL M U L cB _Q -O >� U > O C CO Cu 0_ O Q M CO N > O U N L O OU O C W � N Cu � O O Cu Cu 0) �- CC E � O U a- 2iC U U C It C = O U N U O O (n D v O Cu � L -CL W C 0) O Q QZ O NO O S O U.0 O ++ Z Cu .� CD �+ C CO C C) O C C N O O co C) ai Q CU O O C O = a C W - O CN to U O ccCM JM � m O cati � � C � L N Q O T CO y-+ U� I L Q L U� 1 U G� In O O J0_ M U � C ; J � JO� U � m � U O C C Q O U C O U �N I_- C C to E � O O � � Cu � C 70 � � O L C Q� 0 0 C 70 O N "- CO to Cu O O) � C = 0 70 O .0 C OM �.(n -0 � U > Cu 0 C O O .� U CU C U C N QN O _0 Q Q Q N L CU Tit Q Cu COT O ��'' O 0 C Cu O — G� O Q N U N O asoQ � QQc y VQ Q+E MU O� 0)O O O o > Oc COUU i COOLi CO O a) L cB L 0 C i 2 C M L C cB 0) L L Cu U - L Z N 0_ Cu Z ti O � 2 O '� � ( O) � U iQa aN Q CD 0 CO Cu � 70 N �� O IL C,4 06 O U cn 0 W (n Cu LL. c j N O U fn (A m m w (n Cu c j u) Page 243 of 275 7.a) DS2021-35, David Yauk, GIS Technician re- Planning Division Activit... �o x e O N O C E CO 0 N D O O O � Q� �_ cB " 70 UOL- E O L a) Cu L O O C U C Cu 4 U) N O U Cu O O C CC) � o ZQ( pO � C = U �(nv N � � CU Cu CO Cu w a_ Cu �_ Cu Q LL U CU O O _ C J ti O Cu cfl p O N � Cu JD_ M Um O Q JM UU j O Q C L E O N E 0- 0 O 0 N O C O O Cu N E O -o E -0 E j O O "— m N 0- CuN � Cu C CU _0 ON Cu C) "� " rn r- N a) O Cu O C a � O 0 4) m C)E p �_ E cB p a? cn i N to O v O i M j O � M _ () QO QQ to � MJ () O Q N to E 0_ N 06 C N C O E 0_ C o� C O Cu cfl Cu � L O Cu L N r U r "-' N (B L U ZIP C Cu � F — .� � O ZIP ' C � +�+ U N 'C N � G� Q CU 0 � � Cr O Q 02 U) U) < � U) S ii � N000U) � CI) .0 Page 244 of 275 7.a) DS2021-35, David Yauk, GIS Technician re: Planning Division Activit... rn ON O a) m Sri E CuL L L O O % O CO N a) U C � O U � C U U � 0 ~ c c Cu 00 r_ U 06 N C O U 70 a) C N C O UZ N C � _00 U) 0 2 CU � � � c •� � �' � � � � CUCu a) p � � = `0 O H O O o m _ � _ � � C -0 _ oz � 2 c N m ca `n c Cu 0) O m c�i Q Cu N O U 0 Cu S O p 0 a) U-)J D_ � U U DQ J 0_ J U Cu O c Cu U O _ m U � O� _ L E O E O O N O U 4O E mN c L (D a) Q Cu Lnn o N 0) O Cu O 0 L Q c O a) O CuEm c c U OE (DOZO i E CO (II 00 U �E0- c O ° ° Q� �V EQ 7Umo 4L , oE E Ca CuE Ea) Q)U) L CuL O a) � 3 � ) E � o a) � Q 3 a D CU C) L� (N O -j U) u) S O w z ii c,4 N O > fn U) W U) a) Page 245 of 275 7.a) DS2021-35, David Yauk, GIS Technician re: Planning Division Activit... -Fu Cu VI O Q Cu 70 cB E CO p O C V 0 U) N O C Cu O � U a) ^ D � � 7 L Cu i.i O O ; r v N U) }, Cu 'v }, oCN m � om � o a� � � � � Q � o DJ W = 0 N 0CU 0 - Cu -0 to O J N C 0) E C; N J to O) C LN r ,CU Cu O � �0 CO =O Q J � � Um c JJNU Cu (%) Cu _0 i C E Cu Cu a) _0 O E m U c N _0 L O) Cu C O O _ O C 0 Cu E C cn L � N U_ to O 0 .2 -0 _0 a E O O Q Cu C�(B (QB CU O > C Q CC WE Q C(Q i 0 Q U V Q Q i N i V 'Q O O O _ Q Q cB .0 UQ -c QQ O � Q � � U cB Cu U — L MM ZOO, F10 '� D_ O ZC6 C Cu a) `1 Cu CNN O U) U) O W (q E LLN 0 L Q wQ cB Page 246 of 275 7.a) DS2021-35, David Yauk, GIS Technician re: Planning Division Activit... �7 ado ��y0, S• a� 0) U C D 0 m O _0 m E Cu m F m r- > O C N N O O U O O E O N > CO O I_- i Q Q >+ U N Cu Cu L C O to y L C N O O +�CU U O +�m ON "� O _Q -O _ N N N O U CO 0 y ~ lf) C N i N Q O O O Cu (n O JN 0LU Cu Cu C J U Cu rn 0) m L a Cu 0- F, ON C a) Cu "a) U Q (n O a) L L L -0wU+ O (B 0- 0 N /fl Q O E yO+ i 0 -0r+ O O � � 0) v � Cu � O a) U1 O +r U1 U 0- 0 C C 0 Cu O C C O OCU J Q Cu E -0 C C O E O .L LO 0 0 0 — O N L o �+ � Q E O U = U L CO = O Q U 0 � L �_ L 0 L U (.� Q � � Q C UQ CO C MQ CU UQ � � 0O N _ cB o� c o6 c ' U L Cu U 0 0 E CU >+ 7 (n U N L L 0 U (n Cu �_ .L O 7= Z Cu a)0_ r� U ZCO _ Cr r Cu m CU U O O U- C14 Z On O 0_ N (n O w (n Page 247 of 275 7.a) DS2021-35, David Yauk, GIS Technician re: Planning Division Activit... ro� c4 06 a L L (n y+ > (D V O O i 7 U Q 70 U CU a- Q Cu E o O Q E 0 O CO= Q Q 0 "r O I` 0) () U O 0) N >, U L 4— U) Q� O .L O Cu O J .i Q 0) L y U .Z C .� c � y 0 c Cu 0 0 0) a) U O w O O � N = LC a) p � Z � U 0) c0 0 Cy N cB > O c0 O O� O Cu U 0- a) c O O cB W J0- c,4 U � a) Ja- U � 22i w -0 � 0 0 EL •S ai n � � ? -00 �_ cn O w 0- mom. 4- 0) a) cB E M_ cB O 0 E Q Q CU "_ Cu O 0 O O m a) �� _0 C O L Q 0 E O VO a)CO Cu 0 0- C O O OE O N E L N Cu o }' o rn >' Cu E E 0 c C O � C� � N � � m0 C O O O C� O 00 Qcn 0) ,op Uc Qv >, m 0) z � m m z � N � m ti o •� Cu � ao CO � CL U) CO c0 Cr � � � -0 � O a) Cr ON v� Q � � � iiCN Cu � 06) Cn0 .S � z Page 248 of 275 7.a) DS2021-35, David Yauk, GIS Technician re: Planning Division Activit... y V. W � O � N � J 0_ N N Cu 0 O CO N J N C C W ~ C cY) O O N N O , � N L to Cu S iL y L C M Cu V O ( •� f1 L.L C •� J f1 Ch O '^ Z W ,w LOL W CO M W M Nf� O O LO :5 O 70 Cu U CY) � N Jo Z � NCu - Cu > O O CuN > O O O > J U U-) U-) C.0 0- 0 J U Ln � U W U � a) U U C C to O to O U U Cu c Cu c Q Cu Q Cu 70 a 70 a D) � D) N > to > to t/) (D > N � > J E O (D J E -a O m LU E v Cu ti E U +r Cu G� O O c O O Q v O c O O Q U E W C: oiS C U ECu otS U = (n L (n (B L O (n L LL (n (B L O Z O7 5 .V �� r� Z O' 5 .V � r+ �_ - G� 3 � w Cu �_ ?� _0 (3 (Q LL ACV O (n Q U) LL CCV O � (n Q U) Page 249 of 275 7.a) DS2021-35, David Yauk, GIS Technician re: Planning Division Activit... v�y �DeS % goo is c O � c ° � C14 m Uoo LM E C Cu L CV U O) O N CV L U M O c O CV Cu C •L U E Q 0 �+ O J ca C ° .� U m E O U � �+ O O O a) N ca cn Cu �_ ACV 0) L J N O Q c ti Ca L 0) Cu U � E Q(O Q N Cu CuM J � �UQ � o Cu _0 O N O � O L a) O L 0 N Cu U CU Q O cn U O CU m °c (D E m � Q E (n 5 c� Z � cn Cu 4) c O° C O n Q O E CU E .CO C Q rr O i O) Cu E .° V c L� Cu E V Q U �I o U V Q �O 0I 0 C C V 0 O Q E _0 E � � ti .6E � � m E � � � � Ca CC 0m CO N � cB E � (/� iN O N �/� � ,L O N U Z I Q1 r Q L.L L rn c CO }, �' a'Q m o c E }, o G� 3 O� la _0 a1 Q N O "- U 0 Cu U LL �N O � CnN � QQ Il �N O � U Cn Cu U) ai Page 250 of 275 7.a) DS2021-35, David Yauk, GIS Technician re: Planning Division Activit... 1410, t lip f 1 � O E ti � N O N O 70 L m C CD Cu C O 0 O w � C O Q0 Ln 0J C Cu N ~ ~ O G) U a a N CU 0 U N Cu 0 U) N 2 Z JC) U 0 -a� E � DU � UQ O L U O w L r- C CU L N E � 22E y � °' o �, L O 0 " V O 0 i Z 0 V 0 w (� C Q E C . w O �� Q Q U E � � m oiSC Ea) E � � � o6C � m i OU E U) L O N 2 L -0 O ram+ Q •� � Z 0 r 0 ram+ �� 0 Cr O L G) N � a O O 3 Cu �+ ._ Q 0- Cm O >+ w ._ 0 LL N O (n W D Q LL I N 0 2 Cn U) W U- Page 251 of 275 7.a) DS2021-35, David Yauk, GIS Technician re: Planning Division Activit... ui� v of O p;G j kk a ; i f J L1 ef14 N• W U, o � U � O 0_ M J V) F N 0S M N F- M J N06 O O 2 M CO r- N Ln = COCnCn06 C M � � � �� Uj CO .2.CL t= (n QJN CO V OJ F-- �+ 0_ �' (� O V �+ N tAtitiCfl � r NY i= NOS c > � OO-) C.Oa- ±! L O L ++ N p00 N � +, CO C p = L L O CO 0-) (Q m (B a) H 0- � z � � M to > L N N C O a) C t= JD- LOV) � U' O CO JO � U O to I o C= EN N 2) N s= CO m CO L E CO 0_ F- r- 0_ N � 70 r N = Ea s= m E L I` CO C=CO 0 CO V .� i 0� O O V O E � � Q Ca m � E � _ � a) Ca � CO U) i a--' �-' i = C i N to i i N r/� I, �I` n♦ V�IJ, '� W ZI, I W '}�� CCIO, W O = W w O > L v W LLN O wO LLN 00 (/) U w0- Page 252 of 275 7.a) DS2021-35, David Yauk, GIS Technician re: Planning Division Activit... ap auii=suun❑ Q ,� C �: O�� G Cleve.lan. �1 -.edonte-Srd m LO Sri LO H (Y) 0 0 -J 0. 00 v +r v m +r m CO m N M r` ) m N z CV N m 0 J U c � 0- cn Cu m 0) LL c 7 70 Cu O U "(-' %-� — to O � Q N 0) > i E C Q ^� E N -0 O �N O L O to V 3 L � L V G� N O L 0 0 Q CV O O Q 0 " U — UQ E EU oiS c 0 o E E U) L N Cu 0 L O (n L N Z � G� •1 U +� Z � G� to [L Cr C u_ � O LL Q U) u_ c� O CO fn (q_ w z Page 253 of 275 7.a) DS2021-35, David Yauk, GIS Technician re: Planning Division Activit... ;5§u9pq,O01 c S1. lion E W 4a' � �S Z aui - w�� f r LITUTT 10 T 0-) W (.0//� Al W^ CO06 JN06 C� CO r— N N oCOcncn o0N Q M LOQQ �CL �a- � U V J 0_ 0_ � �+ V � Q }' E U CA ti ti Cfl r N �- a 0o0 � N � QtiC }; O C) CO � (Q � z F- zm c C E —j 0 Q � M 0 J Ja- L ) L ) C-) Ja- LOU M O m Cu O N � O O J tV tV Cu C +� N E U O N �_ E U 0 U ON 0 Q tVo Ow Q — Q — U Q = V o E 0_ — Y +� tV E 0_ � tV sC= L N L_ Cu (n L U) M L C Z i tV M Q z i tV U L CV �N = U E s= O N u_ � O c� U wz U- � 00 cnQ o Page 254 of 275 7.a) DS2021-35, David Yauk, GIS Technician re: Planning Division Activit... �rr r COCO CO � CO cam_ r � r- 'S=04-aui� S=O�aui_ r N Y O N O CMQO 00 IT OD N ti N N N N Q. 0 r I` CO N U O I` N CO CO m � N O ~ c� CO m O N U O U L J V F- _ N N 0_ o z JOU U o m o 00 LO M LO U L N L U O = O C O a) > E L U_ O O (> O O .Q >,(� N Cu Q 00 Q u O cB a) a) O E U O O U Cu i O Cu E .0 cQ � , Cu o E U a '~ Cu � � = Y Cu Ca � °� ( L � U U (n Cu Z � W � .O � .0 •� L � � U L � � � � N Q QC C C > Il oN O � 0 N Q � � 0 H � � U N N0-' Page 255 of 275 7.a) DS2021-35, David Yauk, GIS Technician re: Planning Division Activit... Ln L 0)O tOn �' O a) > N 0 L W � CU L V Q •� L U� .0 O •� OL L W M L � L � c�� 0 " , -00) m0 (n 0C' a) QU m 0 >, Q c5i cn � a' � .E o � � � � o> _ o_ 0 0 .0 :� 0 0 > o ca m 0 0 C W 00 ^ o L VJ W L W � -0 (D +� E O X O Q � (U .O 70 N N (D O U O N O to Cu U 0- - O O L U O > L (n �_ O a) N N 70 0 +� () (U � Q ^, C Y 0 O W Q L ^�♦ L � 2 O 0 m (B U O Q a--� 0 w L C) a) MFj o O Cu W U � � o m & n � � � M � � � � mo � � 4-- � � L .� mo � '`� m � � 0 m m � � E 0 0 � .0 . m 0 0 m a o N U ^>, �_ c� ^0, Q Y o a) E -o Q� U 0 0 a� Q � o +� L L O O (D L 0 a) `F (II 5 0 C L L - L fn (n -0 QN -0 U (nO — 0- o 0 m m a) Q0 m M U U U o 0 m � � U (Q (B (Q p a m Q Q Q O O 0 .o 0) m L a (II Q N O N _0 O (n C/) p '� Z � � N (ten 06 ry EL �+ � N > � (n 2) a) 0 CO M UO 0 a 0 U T U d- Page 256 of 275 7.a) DS2021-35, David Yauk, GIS Technician re: Planning Division Activit... O N N 0 1:1CD U N O � N N O L p > O a) 0) L (Q U a) N — to L m U a) � O N Q 0 70 a) tB � � � O) � a) X a- a) 70 COa) � ? O fl- a) O0 . O N > U O O U O �.O > U (Q 0 a) c� +, Q a) to L O a) O a) - = O U (Q a) cB USZ: a) j > a) cB + O-0 E0_ = a) L a) 0)06' (n � > � � C � � � e oE o —_ CL a m Oma) > E oEN CL U a O ) O O -0ECI) Of OL 0 O O (Q N LL -0 . + L a) (D (Q a) E p +� to L a) M > a) O a)a) O � a) O CO tz � U U ato)i a) ^^,, ^^,, ^, 75 U O M Q � O Q� � N > CO n 0 L L — W 0_ cII t� a U ,� O •— 0-)i Q O a) O O >(� % to L — (� 0 a) CO to O i p (Q N a) +� +� +� _ m a) 0 p � Q Q 0 70 E � O O Q U O N N 0 0 Z) +� � C O L °) ° N .� O p a) CO U 0 O O 0 - +, L O +, V L O O N E U (n 0 a) N N U -0 a) .� 0 Q c� cn -0 U a) _ � m U a) 0) `L LL cn a) � N v m o 06 E _0 (D a) � O � 4-0 1 LL m "i > V C , a) .� z O O .0 a) VL a O O ( O O O Q � 2 E O a) > a w U o_ z w cn Page 257 of 275 7.a) DS2021-35, David Yauk, GIS Technician re: Planning Division Activit... o _ o m C . O C a o p Q Q � om > C Cu � � m �' CUNo CU 0 O — N 2 U � 0) � U 'i Cu ON � � C UCN C CU 2 Q 't U p CU a� � Cuu O � O CB U O Uj II . M U OE 0 -E Cu Cu " C C o � O - L O C>U C — O E CQB O w �� U O 0 Cu L O Q OC c o o00 00O° °> U 0 Cn U U O ° 0H U � m O m m _ m o 0 o o CB o E C O c O O O (BE a) Cr O CU 70L O O (( O c v E C v -0 CB to 0) Cu �Cu U - O O C CU L � � � � � CBC � � EO -0 —_ " � � (, " C Cu U CU > (II � C 0 O 0 0 ov C CD c 0 0 0 CB C o CU o C CU o C -0 O 0 o a a? o � C Cu O - CU 0 °p CU = U �_ CU cn O E -0 - > E O L m to ° m m = C D > (Q m Q-0QU pO ; � p0 � � a O � CUOOp > Eoo 0 m m E v) � E � w °� 2a_ 0 o ai o ov .� ov U 0 0 N v 0 0 '0 Cu Cu U L •L L CU a CU CU p L Q IZ- > 4-0 0- 2 S O CU � •E Cu Cu 0) LN U) - G E _ -0 p, C U S o Z � > Cu �_ m V 0 U Cm L -0U.' CU Cu Q Cu Cu O � p _ (L Cn -a J 0- Page 258 of 275 7.b) DS2021-44, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re: Zoning By-law... 1 ownship o f Report 0 Proud Heritruge, Exciting Feature Report No. To: Prepared By: DS2021-044 Development Services Catherine McLean Committee Intermediate Planner Meeting Date: Subject: Motion # April 7, 2021 Zoning By-law Amendment Application Roll #: 2020-ZBA-08 R.M.S. File #: 4346-010-007-32800 Gordon Lavery D14-58130 1585 Highway 11 North Recommendation(s): Requires Action For Information Only It is recommended: 1 . That Report No. DS2021-044 be received and adopted. 2. That Zoning By-law Amendment Application 2020-ZBA-08 by Gordon Lavery specifically to permit the Removal of the Holding Provision applying to the lands known as 1585 Highway 11 North, be approved. 3. That the Deputy Clerk bring forward the By-law for Council's consideration to Remove the Holding Provision applying to the lands described as Concession 3, South Part Lot 20 (Oro). 4. And that the applicant be advised of the Committee's decision under the Director, Development Services' signature. Background: The subject lands are located at 1585 Highway 11 North, which is at the southeast corner of Highway 11 North and Line 2 South. The subject lands have a lot area of approximately 0.8 hectares (1.9 acres) with approximately 83.9 metres (275.1 feet) of frontage along Highway 11 North and 95.9 metres (314.5 feet) of frontage along Line 2 South. A location map is attached as Schedule 1 to this report and an aerial image is included as Schedule 2. The lands currently contain a 241.0 square metre (2,594.2 square feet) showroom, twelve shipping containers and dozens of sheds on display. The applicant is proposing a 206.3 square metre (2,220.7 square feet) addition to the existing showroom and a 150.0 square metre (1,614.6 square feet) accessory storage building. The surrounding land uses are predominately general commercial uses and environmentally protected lands. Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-044 Page 1 of 9 Page 259 of 275 7.b) DS2021-44, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re: Zoning By-law... The zoning presently in effect for the subject land is General Commercial Exception 314 Hold (GC*314(H)) and Environmental Protection (EP), as illustrated on Schedule 5 to this report. The purpose of the Zoning By-law Amendment is to remove the Holding Provision. The Holding Provision was placed on the property as a condition of Zoning By-law Amendment application 2019-ZBA-22 in order to ensure that Site Plan Approval was in place (plans approved, security provided and agreement executed) before the "H" is removed from the zoning of the lands and a building permit issued for the proposed development. The applicant submitted Site Plan Application (2015-SPA-18) which deals with matters related to the proposed showroom addition, a storage building and the shipping containers. The Site Plan Agreement has been signed and the securities have been submitted to the Township. The Site Plan Agreement will be registered on the title of the property. Analysis: The subject lands are designated Commercial, Environmental Protection One and Environmental Protection Two in the Township's Official Plan, as illustrated on Schedule 3. The north portion of the subject lands are designated Commercial where the existing buildings and proposed commercial expansion will be located. The south east corner of the subject lands are designated Environmental Protection One and Environmental Protection Two due to the presence of Provincially Significant Wetlands (PSW) and significant woodlands located on this portion of the property as identified on Schedule B — Natural Features of the Township's Official Plan, refer to Schedule 4 of this report. In accordance with Section B2.4 of the Township's Official Plan, the applicant submitted an Environmental Impact Study (EIS) which was reviewed and approved by the Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority (NVCA). The EIS concluded that the proposed commercial development could be completed without resulting in any ecological impacts to the Dalston PSW or the unevaluated wetland through the establishment of a 14 metre (45.9 feet) buffer from the Dalston PSW and a 5 metre (16.4 feet) buffer from the unevaluated wetland. These setback areas are currently disturbed with past alteration and filling of the property. The construction of a wetland swale (implemented through Site Plan Control) through an existing Township unopened road allowance will connect the two isolated wetland features and result in a net benefit for the natural heritage features and functions in the area. The proposed wetland swale has been approved by the Township's Operations Division subject to the owner bearing responsibility for the maintenance and repair of the wetland swale. The subject lands are zoned General Commercial Exception 314 Hold (GC*314(H)) and Environmental Protection (EP) in the Township's Zoning By-law 97-95 as amended, as illustrated on Schedule 5. The applicant has requested to have the Holding Provision removed in order to expand the existing commercial use. Planning Staff is satisfied that the Holding Provision is no longer required as the applicant has signed the Site Plan Agreement and submitted the required securities to the Township. Planning Staff have reviewed the proposed application to remove the Holding Provision in the context to relevant planning policies and legislation contained in the Township of Oro-Medonte Official Plan, County of Simcoe Official Plan, A Place to Grow: Growth Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-044 Page 2 of 9 Page 260 of 275 7.b) DS2021-44, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re: Zoning By-law... Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2020) and the Provincial Policy Statement (2020). The application to remove the Holding Provision is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement, conforms to the Growth Plan, the County Official Plan and the Township of Oro-Medonte Official Plan and is considered good planning. Financial / Legal Implications / Risk Management: Potential financial and legal implications could occur if the Committee refuses or neglects to make a decision thereon within 120 days after receipt by the Clerk of the application, the applicant could appeal to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT). Policies/Legislation: • Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13 • Provincial Policy Statement, 2020 • A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, 2020 • County of Simcoe Official Plan • Township of Oro-Medonte Official Plan • Township of Oro-Medonte Zoning By-law No. 97-95, as amended Corporate Strategic Goals: In 2016, Council adopted the Township's Strategic Plan. The following Goals of the Plan are relevant to this application: Balanced Growth: • Ensure land use planning policies manage change and promote economic activity that does not negatively impact the Township's natural heritage features and attributes. Staff are of the opinion that the proposed removal of hold is consistent with the Strategic Plan. Consultations: • Township Development Engineering • Township Building Division • Township Infrastructure and Capital Projects • Simcoe County District School Board • Enbridge Gas • Ministry of Transportation (MTO) • County of Simcoe • Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority (NVCA) Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-044 Page 3 of 9 Page 261 of 275 7.b) DS2021-44, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re: Zoning By-law... Attachments: Schedule 1: Location Map Schedule 2: Aerial Photo Schedule 3: Township Official Plan — Schedule A — Land Use Schedule 4: Township Official Plan — Schedule B — Natural Features Schedule 5: Existing Zoning Conclusion: Planning Staff recommends that Zoning By-law Amendment Application 2020-ZBA-08 be approved and the associated By-Law for Removal of the Hold Provision be passed. Respectfully submitted: Catherine McLean Intermediate Planner Approvals: Date: Derek Witlib, Manager Planning Services March 31 , 2021 Andria Leigh, Director Development Services March 31 , 2021 Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-044 Page 4 of 9 Page 262 of 275 7.b) DS2021-44, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re. Zoning By-law... Schedule 1: Location Map �a,erRa:7 .Meol a�a�e.�d II I Raroeahae,•vanerRa.. 1696 Rd., µ 1. .ti lid 22 hA 2 20 1661 Ga 21 17 19 11 1633 1578 1490 1548 1532 1516 1555 1766 1490 1539 56 1505 1525 A 1555 tP 1483 274 Schedule 1 Location ,�u�nshill��f ®Subject Lands Proud Heritage,Exciting Future 0 200 M File Number:2020-ZBA-08 N I i i 1 I Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-044 Page 5 of 9 Page 263 of 275 7.b) DS2021-44, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re- Zoning By-law... Schedule 2: Aerial Photo dp s � T b Schedule 2 Aerial Photo Township 0 Subject Lands Proud Heritage,Exeiihi,�Farare 0 25 M File Number 2020-ZBA-05 N I I I I I I Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-044 Page 6 of 9 Page 264 of 275 7.b) DS2021-44, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re. Zoning By-law... Schedule 3: Township Official Plan — Schedule A - Land Use :w z 'm\ 11 Ga�dsy �,�rtt AAA �A E� a z �A •s Schedule 3 Township Official Plan - Land Use 4"Subject Lands 4 OEnvironmental Protection Two Industrial I'ourrsl�rpof 0 Agricultural Commercial , Proud Praed Heritage,Exciting F++roar Rural Residential -Environmental Protection one u aaa m File Number:2020-ZBA-08 N I a i I Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-044 Page 7 of 9 Page 265 of 275 7.b) DS2021-44, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re- Zoning By-law... Schedule 4: Township Official Plan — Schedule B — Natural Features —v.seyRa.— - - - ---- - - -- - Mao ��y x'Ix Raises Va11e Rd. `Y "y- - - - - - - - - - - - - - Id. rie.Rd.� r r r R-aQ&::R Yd_ ':V"'r.V:;:: � v v „ r __ r All 27. -w cy� Schedule 4 Township Official Plan - Natural Features Subject Lands Environmental Protection 2 Significant Woodlands Proud Heritage,Eaciling Future Provincially Significant Wetlands(EP1) o 400 m File Number:2020-ZBA-08 N I i i Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-044 Page 8 of 9 Page 266 of 275 7.b) DS2021-44, Catherine McLean, Intermediate Planner re. Zoning By-law... Schedule 5: Existing Zoning esey Rd,r -M nR .e r A/RU z Rftl R, f AIRU GC AIRU IMP GC Gc GC*314(H) AIRU GC AIRU #p A/RU AIRU Schedule 5i Existing Zoning I'ou+rrsllrp of r GC(General Commercial) (�.�It ��t�� Subject Lands Proud Heritage,Exririiq Fdait r AIRU(Agricultural/Rural) ® EP(Environmental Protection) © 100 nn File Number:2020-ZEA-08 N Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2021-044 Page 9 of 9 Page 267 of 275 7.c) DS2021-47, Danielle Waters, Planner re: 2020-ZBA-07, Craig and Andr... Township of Report 0 Proud Heritruge, Exciting Feature Report No. To: Prepared By: DS2021-047 Development Services Danielle Waters Committee Planner Meeting Date: Subject: 2020-ZBA-07 Motion # April 7, 2021 Craig and Andrea Watt Temporary Use By-law Roll #: Garden Suite (Granny Flat) R.M.S. File #: 4346-020-005-15601 6294 Line 9 North D14-058073 Recommendation(s): Requires Action For Information Only It is recommended: 1 . That Report No. DS2021-047 be received and adopted. 2. That Zoning By-law Amendment Application 2020-ZBA-07 and Temporary Use By-law 2021-047 by Craig and Andrea Watt, specifically to permit a Garden Suite for the lands known as 6294 Line 9 North for a period of three (3) years, be approved. 3. That the Deputy Clerk bring forward the appropriate by-laws to adopt a Temporary Use By-law and to execute an agreement for the lands known as 6294 Line 9 North, Part of the East Half of Lot 22, Concession 9 being Part 1, Plan 51 R-15471 (Medonte), Township of Oro-Medonte, for the purposes of a Garden Suite for a period of three (3) years. 4. And that the applicant be advised of the Committee's decision under the Director, Development Services signature. Background: Mr. Craig Watt has submitted an application to permit the extension of a garden suite on the subject property municipally known as 6294 Line 9 North. The lands have an area of approximately 0.41 hectares (1.03 acres) and a lot frontage of approximately 63 metres (206 feet) on the west side of Line 9 North between the Vasey Road and Peter Street East. The property currently contains a single detached dwelling, detached garage and shed located in the central portion of the property. The existing garden suite was approved in 2010 through Temporary Use By-law application Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2020-047 Page 1 of 8 Page 268 of 275 7.c) DS2021-47, Danielle Waters, Planner re: 2020-ZBA-07, Craig and Andr... 2010-ZBA-07, By-law 2010-136, and By-law 2010-137. The garden suite is north of the existing detached garage along the northerly property boundary. This is the only available location given the location of the existing septic system on the southerly side of the driveway. The applicant is proposing to keep the existing Garden Suite on the subject property on a temporary basis for a period of three (3) years as provided for under the Planning Act. Analysis: Section 39.1 of the Planning Act permits Council to authorize the temporary use of a Garden Suite for up to twenty years. Garden Suite is defined as "one unit detached residential structure containing bathroom and kitchen facilities that is ancillary to an existing residential structure and that is designed to be portable." Furthermore, The Act also allows Council to enter into an agreement with the landowner to deal with issues such as: • the installation, maintenance, and removal of the garden suite; • the period of occupancy of the garden suite by any of the persons named in the agreement; and • the monetary or other form of security that Council may require for actual or potential costs to the municipality related to the Garden Suite. The subject land is designated `Rural' in the Township's Official Plan and `Rural' in the County's Official Plan. The policies of the Township and County Official Plans, as well as Provincial Policies (Provincial Policy Statement and Growth Plan) have been reviewed and do not affect the context of the proposed development. Consistent with Section 39.1 of the Planning Act, the Township of Oro-Medonte brought forth a policy in 1997 outlining requirements for Garden Suites in the Township. It states that: a. The garden suite is not to be a mobile home; b. The garden suite utilizes existing services on the property; c. The existing driveway to the main residential dwelling is to be utilized for access and no new entrance from a public road be created for the garden suite; d. The garden suite has a minimum gross floor area of 50 square metres and a maximum gross floor area of 85 square metres; e. Approval for the increased usage of the septic system be obtained; f. An agreement be registered on title providing for the use of the lands; g. The garden suite not be transferable to another owner; and h. Appropriate securities are deposited with the Township to ensure that the agreement can be implemented. The existing Garden Suite uses the existing driveway and the owners previously installed a new septic system, and the garden suite possesses an existing floor area that is 4.1 square metres (45 square feet) over the maximum size permitted. Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2020-047 Page 2 of 8 Page 269 of 275 7.c) DS2021-47, Danielle Waters, Planner re: 2020-ZBA-07, Craig and Andr... Planning Staff do not have concerns with respect to the slightly over-sized floor area which, in Staff's opinion maintains the purpose and intent of the Township's policy. Since the maximum floor area for Garden Suites is a matter of policy and is not a Zoning By-law provision, no Minor Variance is required. Upon site visit, staff noted the presence of a front porch and rear enclosed deck attached to the Garden Suite Building that were not shown on the applicant's site plan and that appear to differ somewhat from the plans associated with the building permit that was issued by the Township in 2010. Building Staff will verify compliance with the building permit, but this detail does not preclude Council's consideration of this request for a 3-year extension to the Temporary Use By-law. In keeping with the Township's Garden Suite Policy, the landowners and occupants will be required to execute an Agreement prepared by Staff that outlines the conditions respecting the installation, and eventual removal of such dwelling unit. The Agreement requires the deposit of$2,500 as security in the case of default of such agreement. In this case, the applicant's current $2,500 security being held by the Township will simply carry forward. Once all parties (Township and owners,) have signed the Agreement, the new Agreement will then registered on title of the property. The property is zoned Agricultural/Rural (A/RU) in the Township's Zoning By-law. The Township's Zoning By-law permits single detached dwellings within the A/RU Zone Unlike other Zoning By-law Amendment applications presented to the Committee, the temporary use does not propose to alter the A/RU Zone symbol applicable to the property, as shown on Schedule A22 of the Zoning By-law. Rather, the Temporary Use By-law paired with the Registered Agreement will allow for the specified use by the specific individuals listed, in addition to the existing use of the property. Financial / Legal Implications / Risk Management: A $2,500 security deposit is required prior to issuance of a building permit as part of the agreement of the garden suite to ensure removal of the unit at the expiration of the agreement. Policies/Legislation: • Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.P.13 • Provincial Policy Statement, 2020 • Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, 2020 • County of Simcoe Official Plan • Township of Oro-Medonte Official Plan • Township of Oro-Medonte Zoning By-law No. 97-95, as amended Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2020-047 Page 3 of 8 Page 270 of 275 7.c) DS2021-47, Danielle Waters, Planner re: 2020-ZBA-07, Craig and Andr... Corporate Strategic Goals: The Township's following Strategic Goals are relevant to this application: Balanced Growth: • Ensure land use planning policies manage change and promote economic activity that does not negatively impact the Township's natural heritage features and attributes. • Encourage the protection of the Township's natural heritage features while ensuring that uses that rely on these features such as home-based businesses, recreation, and tourism are promoted and strengthened. Staff are of the opinion that if the subject Zoning By-law Amendment is approved, that the change on the property will not negatively impact the Township's natural features and attributes. Consultations: • Township Operations Department: No Concerns. • Township Development Engineering: No objections. • Township Building Department: No concerns. Attachments: Schedule 1 : Location Map Schedule 2: Aerial Photo Schedule 3: Applicant's Site Plan Schedule 4: Floor Plan/Elevations Conclusion: Planning Staff recommends that Zoning By-law Amendment Application 2020-ZBA-07 be approved, which would permit the renewal of a Garden Suite Agreement on a temporary basis for a period of three (3) years in accordance with the appropriate agreement being executed by the landowners, occupants, and the Township. Respectfully submitted: Danielle Waters Planner Approvals: Date: Derek Witlib, Manager, Planning Services April 1, 2021 Andria Leigh, Director Development Services April 1, 2021 Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2020-047 Page 4 of 8 Page 271 of 275 7.c) DS2021-47, Danielle Waters, Planner re- 2020-ZBA-07, Craig and Andr... Schedule 1: Location Map �VaeYRdl -Moonst 1n i d. .j II ano gads 8352 p n r ua. � ie•��e.aa.�I - r Rid' R 6331 6312 6312 Z rn d C J 6276 6264 6259 6253 5244 Schedule 1 Location ® Subject Lands Proud Heretage,Fxchhku Future 0 100 M File Number.2020-ZBA-07 N I I I I Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2020-047 Page 5 of 8 Page 272 of 275 7.c) DS2021-47, Danielle Waters, Planner re- 2020-ZBA-07, Craig and Andr... Schedule 2: Aerial Photo a¢ey'Rd. p-.—ndl. p ie¢hpvalle,yIRd. �J'JIe RR - ss Rid'N R z m a - Schedule 2 AL Aerial Photo qMVW Township o.f C3Subject Lands Proud Heritage,Exciting Future a zs m File Number:2020-ZBA-07 I I I I I 1 Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2020-047 Page 6 of 8 Page 273 of 275 Tc) DS2021-47, Danielle Waters, Planner re: 2020-ZBA-07, Craig and Andr... Schedule 3: Applicant's Site Plan PART 2 23 51 R — 23502 0 INS T No. 0 12 1502 1 1 swa( }I M1y1 N5915'00'E(alasEr) 2o9.12'(M) 209.00'(10s) N5$Srf55'E( o,ea'usi T N584�'30"E(P u' �s' ee•.00' STEEL LOT CON. 9 . SHED $ � • , /P��v�Cl'��}'f� Z3� eel 8 93.25' BOARO CLAO e2.75' a GARAGE —]�wr 'ti�-�" z 93.45' �i 92.40' STOREY U2 OEREY EllBRICK kBOARID I.7a 6a PARTRAISED 1 f� CCC WfEwNG 4rr*51 R — 15471 C) �W 911 No. CJ 41 $294 a IL Sap xa /NST. No. 945957 0 � „ oo y 9 tl1 o I N59-15'00 (REFERENCE CMEAM © A ► W Schedule 3 Applicant's Site Plan File Number 2020-ZBA-07 Pseud Hcrit4Qe,RxcifijaQ Fuu.rre Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2020-047 Page 7 of 8 Page 274 of 275 Tc) DS2021-47, Danielle Waters, Planner re: 2020-ZBA-07, Craig and Andr... Schedule 4: Applicant's Floor Plan/Elevations J W a L I �lI4 1 o � I I I � I Z { I If Y w a W 0 N W Schedule 4 Applicant's Elevation Drawings OTxan,ship of File Number 2020-ZBA-07 Proud 1Yeritage,Fxeiting Futirre Development Services April 7, 2021 Report No. DS2020-047 Page 8 of 8 Page 275 of 275