Loading...
08 15 2013 Committee of Adjustment AgendaPage Township of Proud Heritage, Exciting Future 1. OPENING OF MEETING: THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO- MEDONTE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING AGENDA COUNCIL CHAMBERS Thursday, August 15, 2013 TIME: 10:00 a.m. 2. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA: a) Motion to Adopt the Agenda. 3. DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST: 4. ADOPTION OF MINUTES: 3 - 5 a) Minutes of the Committee of Adjustment meeting held on Thursday, July 18, 2013. 5. PUBLIC MEETINGS: 6 - 20 a) 2013 -B -16 (May Family Holdings Ltd.), 696 15/16 Side Road East, Requesting a boundary adjustment/lot addition to an adjacent residential lot (592 15/16 Side Road East). 21 - 36 b) 2013 -A -33 (Terrance and Gwendolyn Scorns), 12 Goss Road, Requesting for relief from Minimum Rear Yard. 37 - 51 c) 2013 -A -34 (Brian and Cynthis Hands), Property located at the south end of Greenwood Avenue (Part of Lot 2, Concession 13 (Oro), Township of Oro - Medonte), Requesting relief from Minimum Rear Yard and Setback from EC Zone Boundary. 52 - 66 d) 2013 -A -35 (Claudio and Milena Del Duca), 2285 Lakeshore Road East, Requesting relief from Minimum Interior Side Yard. 67 - 89 e) 2013 -A -36 (John Wigle and Aimee Bowles), 13 Grandview Crescent, Requesting relief from Minimum Front Yard and Setback from Average High Water Mark of Lake Simcoe. 90 - 105 f) 2013 -A -37 (Robert and Lisa Bickle), 811 Line 9 South, Requesting relief from Minimum Front Yard and Minimum Side Yard (Lake Simcoe). Page 1 of 106 6. NEW BUSINESS: a) Appointment of Deputy Secretary Treasurer. 106 b) 2013 Ontario Association of Committees of Adjustment and Consent Authorities Seminar, September 19 -20, 2013, Horseshoe Valley Resort. 7. NOTICE OF MOTION: None. 8. NEXT MEETING DATE: Thursday, September 19, 2013 at 10:00 a.m. 9. ADJOURNMENT: a) Motion to Adjourn. Page 2 of 106 4.a) Minutes of the Committee of Adjustment meeting held on ... 7'otrrtslrip of Proud Heritage, Exciting Figure Thursday, July 18, 2013 Present: Scott Macpherson, Chair Larry Tupling Roy Hastings Allan Johnson Regrets: Bruce Chappell THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO- MEDONTE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING MINUTES Council Chambers Staff present: Andria Leigh, Director of Development Services; Marie Brissette, Committee Coordinator 1. OPENING OF MEETING: Scott Macpherson assumed the Chair and called the meeting to orde 2. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA: a) Motion to Adopt the Agenda. Motion No. CA130718 -1 Moved by Hastings, Seconded by Tupling TIME: 10:05 a.m. It is recommended that the agenda for the Committee of Adjustment meeting of Thursday, July 18, 2013 be received and adopted. 3. DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST: None declared. 4. ADOPTION OF MINUTES: a) Minutes of the Committee of Adjustment meeting held on Thursday, June 20, 2013. Motion No. CA130718 -2 Moved by Johnson, Seconded by Hastings Carried. It is recommended that the minutes of the Committee of Adjustment meeting of Thursday, June 20, 2013 be adopted as printed and circulated. Carried. Page 1 of 3 Page 3 of 106 4.a) Minutes of the Committee of Adjustment meeting held on ... Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes — July 18, 2013. 5. PUBLIC MEETINGS: a) 2013 -A -30 (Tim and Donna Rainey), 2022 Ridge Road West, Concession 3, Part of the West Half Lot 27 (Former Township of Oro), Application for relief from permitted uses, permitted locations, maximum height, maximum lot coverage and maximum floor area. Tim Rainey, applicant, was present. Motion No. CA130718 -3 Moved by Hastings, Seconded by Tupling It is recommended that the Committee of Adjustment approve Variance Application 2013 -A -30, specifically to permit the construction of a new accessory building possessing a maximum floor area of 98.78 square metres, a maximum lot coverage for all accessory buildings of 5.28 %, subject to the following conditions: 1. That, notwithstanding Sections 5.1.3, 5.1.5, and 5.1.6 of Zoning By -law 97 -95, the proposed detached garage shall otherwise comply with all other applicable provisions of the Zoning By -Law; 2. That the buildings and structures on the property be substantially and proportionally in conformity with the dimensions as set out on the application and sketches, including landscaping, submitted and approved by the Committee; 3. That an Ontario Land Surveyor provide verification to the Township of compliance with the Committee's decision by way of survey /real property report, prior to pouring of the foundation, that the detached accessory building does not exceed a floor area of approximately 98.78 square metres; 4. That sheds #2, 3, and 4 as identified in the applicant's sketch dated May 23, 2013 be demolished prior to the issuance of a building permit for the proposed 98.78 square meter building; 5. That the applicant obtain any permits and /or approvals required from the County of Simcoe; 6. That the applicant obtain any permits and /or approvals required from the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority; and 7. That the appropriate zoning certificate and building permit be obtained from the Township only after the Committee's decision becomes final and binding, as provided for within the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P. 13. Carried. Page 2 of 3 Page 4 of 106 4.a) Minutes of the Committee of Adjustment meeting held on ... Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes — July 18, 2013. 6. NEW BUSINESS: a) Correspondence dated June 17, 2013 from the Ontario Municipal Board, re: OMB Appeal, 2013 -A -18 (Wayne & Christine Lambert), 11 Palm Beach Road. Motion No. CA130718 -4 Moved by Tupling, Seconded by Hastings It is recommended that the correspondence dated June 17, 2013 from the Ontario Municipal Board, re: OMB Appeal, 2013 -A -18 (Wayne & Christine Lambert), 11 Palm Beach Road be received. 7. NOTICE OF MOTION: None. 8. NEXT MEETING DATE: Thursday, August 15, 2013 at 10:00 a.m. 9. ADJOURNMEN a) Motion to Adjourn. Motion No. CA130718 -5 Moved by Hastings, Seconded by Tupling It is recommended that we do now adjourn at 10:40 a.m. Scott Macpherson, Chair Carried. Carried. Andria Leigh, Secretary Treasurer Page 3 of 3 Page 5 of 106 5.a) 2013 -B -16 (May Family Holdings Ltd.), 696 15/16 Side Ro... Page 6 of 106 ° .. TOWNSHIP OF ORO=MEDONTE ty, r it do ite, G3[ p oOG�i� Pnnrd Hnfrggr, euirlot FnIYN Appiication N©: 2011 3 -B-16 Toe Committee of Adjustment Prepared By: Kory CIhishoimn, (Planner Meeting Dates August 15, 2013 Subject: Consent Application 2013-8 -16 (May Family a ®idlings LTD), 696 15/16 Side Road East Concession 9, Lot 15 Motion # Roil #: 4346 -0110 -004 °06400 RM.& File #o Di 0 °46067 RE®UiR ED cCONDmoNS: The following conditions are required to be imposed on the Committee's decision on Consent Application 2013 -5 -16: 1. That one copy of a Registered Reference Plan for the subject and indicating the severed parcel be prepared by an Ontario Land Surveyor be submitted to the Secretary- Treasurer; 2. That the severed lands, with an area of approximately 0.007 hectares, be merged in title with the abutting lands to the south east known as 592 15/16 Sideroad East, and that the provisions of Subsection 3 or 5 of Section 50 of The Planning Act apply to any subsequent conveyance or transaction involving the subject land; 3. That the applicant's solicitor prepare and submit a copy of the proposed conveyance for the parcel severed, for review by the Municipality; 4. That the applicant's solicitor provide an undertaking that the severed lands and the lands to be enhanced will merge in title; and 5. That the applicant apply for and obtain a rezoning on the subject lands to accurately reflect the intended and use; 6. That the conditions of consent imposed by the Committee be fulfilled within one year from the date of the giving of the notice. BACKGROUND: The purpose of this report is to consider Consent application 2013 -B -16 which proposes to permit a boundary adjustment/lot addition. The subject lands are located on the west side of Line 9 North, north of 15/16 Sideroad East, municipally known as 696 15/16 Sideroad East, having extensive frontage along both 15/16 Sideroad East and Line 9 North and a lot area of 39.01 hectares (96.39 acres). The area to be severed /conveyed has no road frontage, a lot depth of 144.78 metres (340 feet), lot width of 54.86 metres (180 feet) and a lot area of 0.57 hectares (1.40 acres). ANALYSIS: The lands proposed to be severed are located in the south -west corner of the subject lands, directly behind the existing residential lot that they intend to be conveyed to, municipally known as 592 15/16 Sideroad East. The lands comprise an area of 0.57 hectares (1.40 acres) and currently sit vacant, with no structures or agricultural use. The lands proposed to be retained is an operating farm with Deveiopmerl Services Meeting Dale: August 15, 2013 Appiical'oo, No. 2013 -B -16 Page 1 of 6 Page 6 of 106 5.a) 2013 -B -16 (May Family Holdings Ltd.), 696 15/16 Side Ro... Page 7 of 106 extensive frontage along both 15/16 Sideroad East and Line 9 North and an area of approximately 38.19 hectares (94.37 acres), and currently contain a single detached dwelling and a number of agricultural buildings. No new lot is proposed to be created as a result of the proposed boundary adjustment/lot addition. The applicant has stated that the purpose of the application is to merge the proposed severed lands with the neighbouring residential lot known as 592 15/16 Sideroad East as they have no agricultural use to the owner. The existing residential lot known as 592 15/16 Sideroad East presently has a frontage of approximately 54.8 metres (180 feet) along 15/16 Sideroad East and a lot area of 0.24 hectares (0.61 acres). The proposed merger would increase the area of the lot known as 592 15/16 Sideroad East to approximately 0.81 hectares (2.00 acres). F ANClALL: Not applicable. FOUOES /LEMSLATlON: STownslhii tflcual Plan All of the lands related to this application are designated Agricultural in the Township's Official Plan. Section D2.2.2 of the Official Plan which contains provisions which permit a consent for the purpose of modifying a lot boundary. `A consent may be permitted for the purpose of modifying lot boundaries, provided no new building lot is created...in addition, the Committee of Adjustment shall be satisfied that the boundary adjustment will not affect the viability of the agricultural parcels affected.,, As no new building lot will be created and the land to be conveyed is not suitable or used for agricultural purposes Planning Staff is of the opinion that this application conforms to the Official Plan. Thwnsh Zorouri law The lands to be severed /conveyed related to this application are zoned Agricultural /Rural (A/RU) and the existing residential lot to be enhanced is zoned Rural Residential Two (RUR2) pursuant to Schedule A13 to Zoning By-law 97 -95. The provisions of the RUR2 Zone include a minimum lot frontage of 45 metres and a minimum lot area of 0.4 hectares, making the existing RUR2 lot non- complying with a lot area of only 0.24 hectares (0.61 acres). The lands proposed to be retained would bring the existing RUR2 lot into conformity, with an existing lot frontage of 54.8 metres (180 feet) and area of 0.81 hectares (2.00 acres) which would both comply with the Zoning Sy -law. The retained Agricultural parcel would continue to comply with all applicable provisions of the Agricultural /Rural Zone Devepoponent Services fleeting Date: August 15, 2013 Application No. 2013 -B -16 Page 2 of 6 Page 7 of 106 5.a) 2013 -B -16 (May Family Holdings Ltd.), 696 15/16 Side Ro... Page 8 of 106 The lands proposed to be conveyed wall need to be rezoned as a condition of consent to reflect the transition from agricultural to residential use. Count ' © Simcoa Offfietal Plan The subject lands are in the area designated Rural and Agricultural and Greenland according to the County of Simcoe's Official Plan. Section 3.3 of the County's Official Plan contains "General Subdivision and Development Policies" and, specifically, Section 3.3.4 states that "[consents] for the purpose of boundary adjustments and consolidation of land holdings are permitted but shall not be for the purpose of creating new lots except as otherwise permitted in this Plan ", and continues to state that "[all] lots created shall conform to all applicable municipal policies and bylaws." Since the proposed boundary adjustment would not result in the creation of a new lot, would conform to the Township's Official Plan and would not introduce any, or lead to an increase in an existing, situation of non - compliance with the Zoning lay -law, the proposal is considered to conform to the County's Official Plan. Provincual Polllciea Provincial Policy Statement, 2005 (PPS, 2005), Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Places to Grow), and Lake Simcoe Protection Plan (LSPP). With respect to the Places to Grow and LSPP policies of the Province of Ontario, Planning staff notes that these documents do not contain provisions for boundary adjustments. However, Planning Staff notes that the PPS, 2005 Section 2.3.4.2 does permit boundary adjustments in prime agricultural areas. Planning Staff is of the opinion that the proposal conforms to Provincial Policies. CONSULTATIOPM Environmental Services Division — Transportation Services Division - Building Division — no concerns. Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority — County of Simcoe — AT7ACCH M ENTS: Schedule # 1 — Location Map Schedule # 2 — Severance Sketch Development Services Meeting Date: August 15, 2013 applicationo Flo. 2013 -B -16 Page 3 off 6 Page 8 of 106 5.a) 2013 -B -16 (May Family Holdings Ltd.), 696 15/16 Side Ro... ICONCLUSION: Planning Staff recommends that Consent Application 2013 -B -16, BE APPROVED, subject to the recommended conditions of consent, for the reasons that the application generally conforms to the Places to Grow policies, the Official Plans for the County and the Township, and to the Provincial Policy Statement, 2005. Respectfully submitted: v;J1n, Kory Chisholm, BES Planner Reviewed by, Derek Wit lib, MCIP, RPP Manager, Planning Services Development Services Meeting Date: August 15, 2013 Application No. 2013 -B -16 Page 4 of 6 Page 9 of 106 5.a) 2013 -B -16 (May Family Holdings Ltd.), 696 15/16 Side Ro... SCHEDULE 1: WCAT OI1 MAP 2013-9-16 (May) SUBJECT PROPERTY (696 15116 Sideroad E) Development ServOces Meeting Date: August 15, 2013 ppppcatpoav Flo. 2013-3-16 Pave 5 of 6 Page 10 of 106 5.a) 2013 -B -16 (May Family Holdings Ltd.), 696 15/16 Side Ro... SCHEDULE 2: SEVERANCE SKETCH 2013-[93-16 (May) Development services Application Flo. 2013 -[B -16 Meting Date: August 15, 2013 Page 6 off 6 Page 11 of 106 5.a) 2013 -B -16 (May Family Holdings Ltd.), 696 15/16 Side Ro... Page 12 of 106 5.a) 2013 -B -16 (May Family Holdings Ltd.), 696 15/16 Side Ro... Page 13 of 106 5.a) 2013 -B -16 (May Family Holdings Ltd.), 696 15/16 Side Ro... Page 14 of 106 5.a) 2013 -B -16 (May Family Holdings Ltd.), 696 15/16 Side Ro... Page 15 of 106 5.a) 2013 -B -16 (May Family Holdings Ltd.), 696 15/16 Side Ro... Page 16 of 106 5.a) 2013 -B -16 (May Family Holdings Ltd.), 696 15/16 Side Ro... Page 17 of 106 5.a) 2013 -B -16 (May Family Holdings Ltd.), 696 15/16 Side Ro... Page 18 of 106 5.a) 2013 -B -16 (May Family Holdings Ltd.), 696 15/16 Side Ro... Page 19 of 106 5.a) 2013 -B -16 (May Family Holdings Ltd.), 696 15/16 Side Ro... THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO- MEDONT PO Box 100, O, ,. UN LOL 2X'0, (705) -4N7 -2171, ,t,, August 1, 2013 NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING FOR CONSENT APPLICATION Meeting Date: August 15, 2013 Time: 10:00 a.m. Location: COUNCIL CHAMBERS Administration Building 148 Line 7 S Oro, Ontario LOL 2X0 PURPOSE OF APPLICATION A Consent application has been submitted by May Family Holdings Ltd., for a property located at 696 15/16 Side Road East, requesting a boundary adjustment/lot addition to an adjacent residential lot (592 15/16 Side Road East). ApplI ation: 2013 -B -16 The subject lands (696 15/16 Side Road East), contain an existing single detached dwelling and agricultural buildings and have approximately 525.8 metres (1725 feet) of frontage along 15/16 Side Road East, and a lot area of approximately 39 hectares (96.37 acres). The lands proposed to be severed and added to 592 15/16 Side Road East do not contain road frontage, but would have a width of approximately 54.8 metres (180 feet), a lot depth of approximately 145 metres (475 feet), an area of approximately 0.82 hectares (2 acres) and are intended to be merged with the adjacent residential lot to the south. The lands proposed to be retained would have frontage of approximately 525.8 metres (1725 feet), and a lot area of approximately 38.2 hectares (94.37 acres) and are intended to continue to be used for agricultural purpose HAVE YOUR SAY Input on the application is welcome and encouraged. You can meeting or by making a written submission to the Township. If may proceed in your absence and, except as otherwise provide entitled to any further notice in the proceedings. WRITTEN SUBMISSIOI To provide input in writing or to request written notice of the dec please send a letter or e-mail (aleigh @oro- medonte.ca) to the of Adjustment. We would appreciate receiving any written comments from tl' application by August 12, 2013. C1. THE LAKE SIMCOE REGION CONSERVATION .AUTHORITY HAS REVIEWED THIS APPLICATION AND DETERMIN THAT WE HAVE NO OWE P'[1 .N J,C !TS APPROVAL 75TE J.111* SIGNATURE If you do not make written submission to the Township of Oro- Medonte before a decision on the Consent is provided and subsequently submit an appeal of the decision, the Ontario Municipal Board may dismiss the appeal. MORE INFORMATION For further information please contact the Secretary- Treasurer of the Committee of Adjustment during regular office hours Monday to Friday 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. A copy of the Staff Report will be available to the public on August 12, 2013 after 9:00 a.m. on the Township's Web Site: www_oro- medonte.ca or from the Development Services Department. Andria Leigh Secretary- Treasurer of the Committee of Adjustment Page 20 of 106 5.b) 2013 -A -33 (Terrance and Gwendolyn Scorns), 12 Goss Road... Page 21 of 106 TOWNSHIP OF ORO-NHEDONTE 49;: lledonte, G3C p OR Proud firrinwr, Exnrbng failure Application (Noe 2013 -A -33 Toe Comm ittee of Adjustment Prepared By: ftory Chisholm, (Planner, Meeting Dater As August 15, 2313 SuNecte Qiao•ianoe Application (Terrance and Gwendolyn Scorns) 12 Goss Road) Concession 1, Plan 791, foot 37 ,3 ; M®tion # Doll #o 4346 =030 - 010 -15200 RAILS. File #o U1346092 REQUORE® CONEN T lO S: The following conditions are required to be imposed on the Committee's decision: 1. That, notwithstanding Table B1 of Zoning By -law 97 -95, as amended, the single detached dwelling shall otherwise comply with all other applicable provisions of the Zoning By -law; 2. That an Ontario Land Surveyor provide verification to the Township of compliance with the Committee's decision by 1) pinning the footing and 2) verifying in writing prior to pouring of the foundation by way of survey /real property report that the single detached dwelling be located no closer than 0.7 metres from the rear (north) property line; 3. That the location and size of the proposed single detached dwelling be substantially in conformity with the dimensions as set out on the application and sketches submitted and approved by the Committee; 4. That the applicant obtain any permits and /or approvals required, from the Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority; and 5. That the appropriate zoning certificate and building permit be obtained from the Township only after the Committee's decision becomes final and binding, as provided by the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P. 13. gACKGI; OILTND: The property contains currently contains a 1- storey dwelling with no basement that is 52 square metres (560 square feet) 8.5 metres (28 feet) wide and 6.1 metres (20 feet) deep. The existing dwelling is currently 0.7 metres (2 feet) from the rear property line and the applicant is proposing to replace the existing dwelling with a larger 1- storey dwelling with walkout basement and garage 9.1 metres (30 feet) wide, 15.2 metres (50 feet) deep, 123.8 square metres (1333 square feet) main floor area, 90 square metres (969 square feet) basement floor area in the same spot, seeking a reduction in the minimum required rear yard of 7.5 metres (24.6 feet) to 0.7 metres (2 feet). DeveDopmttment services Mleefing Date August 15, 2013 Appiioat6on No, 2013 -A -33 Page 1 of 7 Page 21 of 106 5.b) 2013 -A -33 (Terrance and Gwendolyn Scorns), 12 Goss Road... Page 22 of 106 AIMALLYSISt The applicant is requesting the following relief from Zoning By -law 97 -95: Zone: Fiesiderttiai Limited Service (RL3 ) Gcl�c oiredl Pro osedl Zone Section 4.0 — Minimum mn Rewio edl Gear Yard Seheck 7.5 metres 0.7 metres FNANCDAIL: Not applicable. POLICIES /ILEMSILATVDN: Does the variance conform to the general intent of the Official Plan? The subject lands are designated Shoreline in the Township's Official Plan, and Section C5 of the Official Plan contains policies related to the use and development of lands in this designation. in Section C5.1 of the Official Plan the stated objectives of the Shoreline designation are: o To maintain the existing character of the predominantly residential area. o To protect the natural features of the shoreline area and the immediate shoreline. o To ensure that existing development is appropriately serviced with water and sewer services. Residential uses are permitted in the Shoreline designation and this variance application is to permit the replacement/enlargement of an existing residential dwelling in a way which will suit the character and nature of the Bass Lake Shoreline Area. Based on the above, Planning Staff is of the opinion that the requested variance conforms to the Official Plan with respect to maintaining the existing character of the predominantly residential area. Does the variance meet the general intent of the Zoning By -law, and is the vari ncce appropriate for the desirable development of the loll? The subject property is zoned Residential Limited Service (RLS) Zone in the Township's Zoning By- law and the RLS Zone permits single detached dwellings. The Zoning By-law's requirement for a minimum rear yard setback of 7.5 metres serves to maintain appropriate buffering from neighbouring properties /uses and maintain a consistent and attractive Dow density residential character in typically private access cottage /shoreline areas. Planning Staff has inspected the lands and notes that the vast majority of surrounding dwellings on the north side of Goss Road have similar very small rear yard setbacks. The property these lots back onto is a large agricultural parcel that is currently used to grow corn, with no structures close to Goss Road. The requested variance would not appear to be out of character with the surrounding development. A functional and adequate amenity space would remain in the remainder of the Dot. Development Services fleeting Date August 15, 2013 Application No. 2013 - %, -33 Page 2 of 7 Page 22 of 106 5.b) 2013 -A -33 (Terrance and Gwendolyn Scorns), 12 Goss Road... It should also be noted that the long existing dwelling was located at the same setback as what is being applied for, so no additional encroachment than what has already long occurred will take place. Based on the above, Planning Staff is of the opinion that the requested variance to the setback from the rear lot line would conform to the general intent of the Zoning By -law and would be appropriate for the desirable development of the lot. Is the variance minor? As the variance is considered to conform to the general intent of the Official Plan, to meet the general intent of the Zoning By -Law, is considered appropriate for the desirable development of the lot, and is not anticipated to have an adverse effect on surrounding land uses, it is considered to be minor. CONSULTATIONS: Environmental Services Division — Transportation Division - Building Division — Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority - County of Simcoe - IATTACHMENTS: Schedule 1: Location Map Schedule 2: Site Plan Schedule 3: Existing Site Plan Schedule 4: Elevation Sketch ICONCLUSION: It is the recommendation of the Planning Department that Variance Application 2013 -A -33 be approved, specifically to permit the replacement of existing cottage with a reduced minimum rear yard setback of 0.7 metres, for the reasons that the application appears to meet the four tests of the Planning Act. Respectfully submitted: Kory Chisholm, BES Planner, Reviewed by: Derek Witlib, MCIP, RPP Manager, Planning Services Development Services Application No. 2013 -A -33 Meeting Date August 15, 2013 Page 3 of 7 Page 23 of 106 5.b) 2013 -A -33 (Terrance and Gwendolyn Scorns), 12 Goss Road... SCHEDULE 1: LOCA7ON MAP 20313 -A -33 (Scorns) Development Servhoes Meeting bete August 15, n13 Application No. 2013-A-33 Page 4 of 7 Page 24 of 106 5.b) 2013 -A -33 (Terrance and Gwendolyn Scorns), 12 Goss Road... 25913 0 \SCHEDULE 2e PROPOSED SO E PLAN 2013-A=33 (Sc ©ns) X 259.50 X259.52 x259.45 1pil -- X 259.52 X 259.56 Lo2, PIN i! IN 5 2 9.05 8531 .8.7GI.S' X 259.82 Nko X 259.75 259 488'56'E 1.50 �q59 Sk'g9 X259.51 .' 259.55 �° NI x259.380382 7747 OWELL D X258.50 RILLED' WELL BENCH MARK NAIL IN sa HYDRO POLE (ou) ELEVATION= 257.53 G.S.C. 57.32 ` sT ?>\ 25 .48 X 7 N CATCH 257.33755\ IN 257.291{ 19'7 S.4...r� 8 \553 1``E "emu "�/ p335 ?'N PROPbs ::- STAIRS SHED 95 l•- 257.17 p5 / L \1�E 23 ry7 �55 \pN 0.0 /pJE(tV,EF� X 259.37 9.35w E DWELLING X 258.52 X 259.09 X 259.00 58.94 DRILLED WELL \`' 4itA, X 258.17 O / \5 257.2> '(HP 257.03 vo� 257.01 �Pq /p..14-1°4 (WIT) 57.96 49 Development Services Application No. 2013-A-33 Meeting Date August 15, 2013 Page 5 of 7 Page 25 of 106 5.b) 2013 -A -33 (Terrance and Gwendolyn Scorns), 12 Goss Road... 259.52 X 259.62 C" X255.75 3n° `-. (W) 1';# H61 259. 148 8506'E 63 259.55 a ^� )3 a2 2.75 9. SCHEDULE 3e I XDST G SOTE PLAN 2013-A-33 (Scorns) 58 X259.52 X259.45 222 .501 } G 259.48 e.5 N 4P T]] P X259.51 Yr259.37 1 ALUMINUM MR SIDED s'T DWELLING FFF= 259.95 MUN. NO. 12 259.0E S e DWELLING 250 moo` nn 3J n ,oT D E C K / 2P7700144T( J 413(258 82 >Ep cO ^�4 ?T %259.1] �-9 1.B., 75 °`0i2 I %25431 3 l / %256.20 y4+ �� ; $a ' ? x255.4 \ -1 v- U -, ("5'6 � 2.,' i % N. �z5x.o1 ...........X 257,03 i% g p , ° $, o �$ / �i O P �y.SES OP n 4 257.71 �} G, Q` ry� M 56.46 ( Z, zm, 1 i. °•,�3� p ,X.-157.06 ` j .59 pPftK,NG eq j, v6‘.......___.......„ Jc0.5. 0Z J� 5?7€D f;. GRN`R� A ,�ti 7.16 -C�' 1 hEz ' / i x 257.17 65 AO' 4 I'. ti 9 1s>ry /gS° 58.99 DRILLED WELL y w x256.,7 2 p, � x 247.25 2 ,c,\\-\..F3 ' XF O x119 �o Devepopmment Services Meeting Date August 1592013 Application Flo, 2013 -A =33 Page 6 of 7 Page 26 of 106 5.b) 2013 -A -33 (Terrance and Gwendolyn Scorns), 12 Goss Road... SCHEDULE 4: ELEVATMN SKETCH 2013-A-33 (Scorns) rof Development Services Meethig Date August 15, 2013 Appllcatuopn Flo. 2013 -A -33 Pave 7 of 7 Page 27 of 106 5.b) 2013 -A -33 (Terrance and Gwendolyn Scorns), 12 Goss Road... Page 28 of 106 5.b) 2013 -A -33 (Terrance and Gwendolyn Scorns), 12 Goss Road... Page 29 of 106 5.b) 2013 -A -33 (Terrance and Gwendolyn Scorns), 12 Goss Road... I_■_' 7 n M___ • Page 30 of 106 5.b) 2013 -A -33 (Terrance and Gwendolyn Scorns), 12 Goss Road... Page 31 of 106 5.b) 2013 -A -33 (Terrance and Gwendolyn Scorns), 12 Goss Road... Page 32 of 106 5.b) 2013 -A -33 (Terrance and Gwendolyn Scorns), 12 Goss Road... Page 33 of 106 5.b) 2013 -A -33 (Terrance and Gwendolyn Scorns), 12 Goss Road... 705 - 329.0765 Page 34 of 106 5.b) 2013 -A -33 (Terrance and Gwendolyn Scorns), 12 Goss Road... Page 35 of 106 5.b) 2013 -A -33 (Terrance and Gwendolyn Scorns), 12 Goss Road... A. pSo Gq T,k Member Municipalities Adjala- Tosorontio Amaranth Barrie The Blue Mountains Bradford -West Gwillimbury Clearview Coll i ngwood Essa Grey Highlands Innisfil Melancthon Mono Mu lmur New Tecumseth Oro - Medonte Shelburne Spri ngwater Wasaga Beach Watershed Counties Dufferin Grey Simcoe Member of Conservation ONTARIO Nalura!Champions August 6, 2013 Andria Leigh, Secretary- Treasurer Committee of Adjustment Township of Oro - Medonte P.O. Box 100 Oro, Ontario LOL 2X0 Dear Ms. Leigh; RECEIVED Re: Application for Minor Variance 2013 -A -33 Part Lot 3, Concession 1 (Orillia), 12 Goss Road Township of Oro - Medonte AUG 0 ,9 2013 OR0- 1EDONTE ?O%NsHip The Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority (NVCA) has reviewed this application for minor variance and based upon our mandate and policies under the Conservation Authorities Act, we have no objection to its approval. Please regard this letter as clearance under the Conservation Authorities Act for the construction of the new cottage. Thank you for circulating this application for our review and please forward a copy of any decision. Sincerely, Tim Salkeld Resource Planner Celebrating 50 Years in Conservation 1960 -2010 NOTTAWASAGA VALLEY CONSERVATION AUTHORITY Centre for Conservation John Hix Conservation Administration Centre Tiffin Conservation Area 8195 8th Line Utopia, On LOM 1T0 Telephone: 705.424.1479 Fax: 705.424.2115 Web: www.nvca.on.ca Email: admin @nvca.on.ca Page 36 of 106 5.c) 2013 -A -34 (Brian and Cynthis Hands), Property located a... Tuumrhiy�('. l i /I ionte Proud f- P<.itgq., Estitimq Fnn+re TOWNSHIP OF ORO- MEDONTE REPORT Application No: 2013 -A -34 To: Committee of Adjustment Prepared By: Derek Witlib, Manager, Planning Services Meeting Date: August 15, 2013 Subject: Variance Application (B. & C. Hands) Greenwood Avenue Part Lot 2, Concession 13 (Former Township of Oro) Motion # Roll #: 4346- 010 - 005 -13601 R.M.S. File #: D13 -46068 IREQUIRED CONDITIONS: The following conditions are required to be imposed on the Committee's decision: 1. That, notwithstanding Table B1 (Minimum Rear Yard) and Section 5.28 (Setbacks from Limits of Environmental Protection Zone) of Zoning By -law 97 -95, the proposed single detached dwelling shall otherwise comply with all other applicable provisions of the Zoning By -Law; 2. That the buildings and structures on the property be generally in conformity with the dimensions as set out on the application and sketches submitted and approved by the Committee; 3. That the applicant obtain any permits and /or approvals required, from the Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority; and 4. That the appropriate zoning certificate and building permit be obtained from the Township only after the Committee's decision becomes final and binding, as provided for within the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c. P. 13. IBACKGROUND: The subject property is currently tree - covered and is vacant of buildings and structures. The property comprises a lot area of 0.27 hectares (0.66 acres) and frontage of approximately 20 metres along the paved portion of Greenwood Avenue. The property also has water frontage on Bass Lake and the easterly portion of the property, adjacent to Bass Lake, is part of a Provincially Significant Wetland. The variances have been requested to accommodate the construction of a single detached dwelling (cottage) on that portion of the property that is outside of the Provincially Significant Wetland. ANALYSIS: The applicant is requesting the following relief from Zoning By -law 97 -95: Zones: Shoreline Residential (SR) and Environmental Protection (EP) Required Proposed 7.5 metres 4.0 metres Section 5.28 - Setback from EP Zone Boundary 30 metres 0 metres Table B1 — Minimum Rear Yard Development Services Application No. 2013 -A -34 Meeting Date August 15, 2013 Page 1 of 7 Page 37 of 106 5.c) 2013 -A -34 (Brian and Cynthis Hands), Property located a... IFINANCIAL: Not applicable. POLICIES /LEGISLATION: Does the variance conform to the general intent of the Official Plan? The property is designated Shoreline in the Official Plan and a portion of the property is within the Environmental Protection Two overlay. Permitted uses in the Shoreline designation include single detached dwellings. The Environmental Protection Two overlay is intended to identify environmentally sensitive areas and protect those areas from incompatible activities and development that would have a negative impact on significant natural features. The Official Plan states that the boundaries of the Environmental Protection Two overlay are considered approximate and the Official Plan recognizes that further studies may identify natural features in greater detail and map the limits of those features. In the case of the subject lands, studies were commissioned by the applicants and were reviewed and accepted by the Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority. These studies determined that the majority of the property is occupied by a Provincially Significant Wetland. The wetland boundary and the limits of development have been verified on -site to the satisfaction of the Conservation Authority. The westernmost portion of the property remains eligible for development in accordance with the policies of the Shoreline designation in which a single detached dwelling is a permitted use. The entire property remains under Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority regulation and the Conservation Authority has advised that they have no objection to the proposed development, subject to the applicants obtaining the necessary Conservation Authority permit which would be subject to conditions, including that the applicants establish a conservation easement and restrictive covenants registered on the title of the property in order to further regulate the details of the development. Based on the above, the variances are considered to conform to the Official Plan. Does the variance meet the general intent of the Zoning By -law, and is the variance appropriate for the desirable development of the lot? The subject property is zoned Shoreline Residential (SR) and Environmental Protection (EP) according to the Township's Zoning By -law 97 -95. A single detached dwelling is a permitted use within the Shoreline Residential (SR) Zone. Development is not permitted within the Environmental Protection (EP) Zone and, furthermore, Section 5.28 of the Zoning By -law requires a 30 metre setback from the boundary of the Environmental Protection (EP) Zone. The intent of the 30 metre setback is to ensure an adequate distance buffer between development and natural features. However, the applicants have requested that the 30 metre buffer be waived in order to accommodate the single detached dwelling proposed to be located within the limited developable area on the property, but outside of the Environmental Protection (EP) Zone. It is worth noting that the current EP Zone boundary does not accurately reflect the limit of the wetland and that the proposed development would be farther away from the Development Services Meeting Date August 15, 2013 Application No. 2013 -A -34 Page 2 of 7 Page 38 of 106 5.c) 2013 -A -34 (Brian and Cynthis Hands), Property located a... wetland than it would be from the current boundary of the EP Zone. At the time of the Township's next update to the Zoning By -law it is anticipated that the EP Zone boundary will be corrected. The Conservation Authority has advised that it has no objection to the proposed location of the building based on the studies that have been carried out. The applicants have also requested a reduction to the rear yard setback from 7.5 metres to 4 metres. The intent the rear yard setback is to provide recreation an amenity space on a lot and a measure of privacy. Planning Staff notes that, notwithstanding the proposed 4 metre rear yard, adequate open space will remain on the lot to provide for the amenity and recreation needs of the residents. There are no and uses existing or anticipated to the south of the subject lands that migh be negatively impacted by a reduction to the rear yard. For these reasons, Planning Staff is of the opinion that the application maintains the general intent of the Zoning By -law and is appropriate for the desirable development of the lot. Is the variance minor? As the proposed variances are considered to conform to the general intent of the Official Plan, to meet the general intent of the Zoning By -Law, to be appropriate for the desirable development of the lot, the variances are considered to be minor. ICONSULTATIONS: • Environmental Services Division — • Transportation Division - • Building Division — Tertiary septic system to be installed. Subsurface soil report shows peat soils present and must be dealt with as part of construction. • County of Simcoe — • Nottawasaga Conservation Authority — No objection, NVCA Permit required, including conservation easement and restrictive covenants. 1 ATTACHMENTS: Schedule 1: Location Map Schedule 2: Site Plan Schedule 3: Aerial Map ICONCLUSION: Planning Staff recommends that Minor Variance Application 2013 -A -34 be approved, specifically, to permit the construction of a single detached dwelling, for the reason that the variances appear to meet the four tests of the Planning Act. Development Services Application No. 2013 -A -34 Meeting Date August 15, 2013 Page 3 of 7 Page 39 of 106 5.c) 2013 -A -34 (Brian and Cynthis Hands), Property located a... Respectfully submitted: ____4// Derek Witlib, MCIP, RPP Manager, Planning Services SMT Approval / Comments: --Pet C.A.O. Approval / Comments: Development Services Meeting Date August 15, 2013 Application No. 2013 -A -34 Page 4 of 7 Page 40 of 106 5.c) 2013 -A -34 (Brian and Cynthis Hands), Property located a... SCHEDULE 1: LOCATION MAP 2013 -A -34 (Hands) SUBJECT PROPERTY (Greenwood Avenue) Development Services Meeting Date August 15, 2013 Application No. 2013 -A -34 Page 5 of 7 Page 41 of 106 5.c) 2013 -A -34 (Brian and Cynthis Hands), Property located a... SCHEDULE 2: SITE PLAN 2013 -A -34 (Hands) WI OS 83,54* 0 s ONE 9 030OO» ZIOi '6 Al6f Q3 S,'°" �I- Q0-74 (VI) - s 1 z st _Y2g 3 go �£Sgs 2. i'� 21 2 2 s ro ar 0 U z 0 po Development Services Meeting Date August 15, 2013 Application No. 2013 -A -34 Page 6 of 7 Page 42 of 106 5.c) 2013 -A -34 (Brian and Cynthis Hands), Property located a... Wetland Boundary Amendment, Bass Lake - Hands Property SCHEDULE 3: Aerial Map 2013 -A -34 (Hands) 30 15 0 30 Meters 0 O 0 0 43 V 'p 0 C .J O cv 0 as m e W Development Services Meeting Date August 15, 2013 Application No. 2013 -A -34 Page 7 of 7 Page 43 of 106 5.c) 2013 -A -34 (Brian and Cynthis Hands), Property located a... Page 44 of 106 5.c) 2013 -A -34 (Brian and Cynthis Hands), Property located a... Page 45 of 106 5.c) 2013 -A -34 (Brian and Cynthis Hands), Property located a... dins ",,r,'''D;t�r„ , r• ohs.. lrikrr Page 46 of 106 5.c) 2013 -A -34 (Brian and Cynthis Hands), Property located a... Page 47 of 106 5.c) 2013 -A -34 (Brian and Cynthis Hands), Property located a... Page 48 of 106 5.c) 2013 -A -34 (Brian and Cynthis Hands), Property located a... Page 49 of 106 5.c) 2013 -A -34 (Brian and Cynthis Hands), Property located a... Member Municipalities Adjala- Toseron■ o Amaranth Barrie The Blue Mountain; Bradford -West Gwillim b :r, Clearv;ew Collingwood Essa Grey Highlands Innisfil Melancthon Mono Mulrnur New Tecumseth Oro -Medor ie Shelburne �pnngt,aic -� Wasae " . Watershed Counties Member of Conservation ONTARIO August 8, 2013 Andria Leigh, Secretary- Treasurer Committee of Adjustment Township of Oro - Medonte P.O. Box 100 Oro, Ontario LOL 2X0 Dear Ms. Leigh; Re: Application for Minor Variance 2013 -A -34 Part Lot 2, Concession 13 (Oro), Greenwood Avenue Township of Oro - Medonte The Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority (NVCA) has reviewed this application in accordance with policies established under the Provincial Policy Statement, regulations established under the Conservation Authorities Act and the Conservation Land Act. The NVCA has reviewed the Site Grading Plan prepared by C.T. Strongman Surveying (dated February 19, 2013), the Environmental Impact Statement prepared by Azimuth Environmental Consulting (dated March 2013) and the Geotechnical Investigation prepared by Geospec Engineering Limited (dated March 26, 2012) prepared in support of a proposed single family residence on this property. Based upon this information, the NVCA has no objection to the approval of this application. We advise a permit will be required under the Conservation Authorities Act prior to development. Recommendations within the Geotechnical Investigation and the Environmental Impact Statement will be referenced within conditions of the permit. A minimum opening elevation for the dwelling and a minimum elevation for the driveway will also be stipulated to ensure adequate elevation above the Bass Lake Regional Storm flood elevation of 252.26 metres. The NVCA has received the appropriate application. As mentioned in previous correspondence (letter dated July 31, 2009), the NVCA will require the establishment of a Conservation Agreement and Restrictive Covenants on the property to recognize the inherent natural heritage features and functions associated with the Provincially Significant wetland and Bass Lake and to discourage future encroachment into the ...12 Celebrating 50 Years in Conservation 1960 -2010 NOTTAWASAGA VALLEY CONSERVATION AUTHORITY Centre for Conservation John Hix Conservation Administration Centre Tiffin Conservation Area 8195 8th Line Utopia, On LOM 1TO Telephone: 705.424.1479 Fax: 705.424.2115 Web: www.nvca.on.ca Email: adminenvca.on.ca Page 50 of 106 5.c) 2013 -A -34 (Brian and Cynthis Hands), Property located a... Minor Variance 2013 -A -34 Township of Oro - Medonte continued Page 2 wetland. This will be required prior to the issuance of a permit under the Conservation Authorities Act. Our request for the establishment of a Conservation Agreement and Restrictive Covenants is in accordance with the Conservation Land Act, the Conservation Authorities Act and the NVCA Conservation Land Protection and Acquisition Policy. It should be noted that this approach is also in concert with the Natural Heritage Policies of the Provincial Policy Statement. Thank you for circulating this application for our review and please forward a copy of any decision. Sincerely, Tim Salkeld Resource Planner Page 51 of 106 5.d) 2013 -A -35 (Claudio and Milena Del Duca), 2285 Lakeshore... TVwluAip o Proud Nrruogr, Exciting Future' TOWNSHIP OF ORO- MEDONTE REPORT Application No: 2013 -A -35 To: Committee of Adjustment Prepared By: Adrianna Spinosa Planner Meeting Date: August 15, 2013 Subject: Variance Application Milena & Claudio DelDuca 2285 Lakeshore Road East Plan 952, Lot 75 (Former Township of Oro) Motion # Roll #: 4346 - 010 - 012 -11700 R.M.S. File #: D13 -46154 REQUIRED CONDITIONS: The following conditions are required to be imposed on the Committee's decision: 1. That, notwithstanding Table B1 of Zoning By -law 97 -95, as amended, the single family dwelling shall otherwise comply with all other applicable provisions of the Zoning By -law; 2. That an Ontario Land Surveyor provide verification to the Township of compliance with the Committee's decision by 1) pinning the footing and 2) verifying in writing prior to pouring of the foundation by way of survey /real property report that the single family dwelling /attached garage be located no closer than approximately 1.5 metres from the south /westerly interior side lot line; 3. That the location and size of the proposed single family dwelling be in conformity with the dimensions as set out on the application and sketches submitted and approved by the Committee; 4. That the applicant obtain any permits and /or approvals required, from the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority; and 5. That the appropriate zoning certificate and building permit be obtained from the Township only after the Committee's decision becomes final and binding, as provided by the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c. P. 13. IBACKGROUND: The property presently contains a single storey dwelling (approximately 600 sq.ft.), attached carport, and two detached sheds. The applicant is proposing to replace the existing dwelling /carport with a new single story dwelling (approximately 1900 sq.ft.) and attached two car garage. ANALYSIS: The applicant is requesting the following relief from Zoning By -law 97 -95: Zone: Shoreline Residential (SR) Zone Required 1. Table B1 — Minimum Required Interior Side Yard 3.0 metres Proposed 1.5 metres FINANCIAL: Not applicable. Development Services Application No. 2013 -A -35 Meeting Date August 15, 2013 Page 1 of 5 Page 52 of 106 5.d) 2013 -A -35 (Claudio and Milena Del Duca), 2285 Lakeshore... Page 53 of 106 POUCIES/L G SLLATOOE : Does the variance conform to the general intent of the Official Plan? The subject lands are designated Shoreline in the Township's Official Plan, and Section C5 of the Official Plan contains policies related to the use and development of lands in this designation. Single detached residential uses are permitted in the Shoreline designation and one of the Official Plan's stated objectives of the Shoreline designation is, "To maintain the existing character of the predominantly residential area." Planning Staff has visited the subject lands and notes the shoreline lots along Lakeshore Road East, between Line 12 and Line 13, are relatively narrow, with the existing dwellings generally positioned close together. Some of the existing older dwellings appear to possess interior side yard setbacks which may be less than the 3 metre minimum required by the Zoning Sy -law. Planning Staff is of the opinion that the variance is consistent with the existing character and conforms to the general intent of the Official Plan. Does the variance tweet the general intent of the Zoning Byelaw, and is the variance appropriate for the desirable development of the lot? The subject property is zoned Shoreline (Residential (SR) Zone in the Township's Zoning By -law and the SR Zone permits single detached dwellings. The Zoning By-law's requirement for a minimum interior side yard setback of 3 metres is intended to provide spatial separation between neighbouring dwellings, as well as provide ease of access and maintenance on a lot. As there are no windows on the adjacent dwelling side -wall, and there is an existing wood board fence between the two properties, the variance does not appear to compromise the privacy and enjoyment of the south /westerly neighbour. Planning Staff is of the opinion that in this case there will be no significant impact on adjacent properties or on the neighbourhood as a whole. The variance would still allow for adequate access around the building and Planning Staff is of the opinion that the variance maintains the general intent of the Zoning By-law and is appropriate for the desirable development of the lot. is the variance minor? As the proposed variance related to the addition is considered to conform to the general intent of the Official Plan, to meet the general intent of the Zoning By-Law, is considered appropriate for the desirable development of the lot, it is considered to be minor. Environmental Services Division — Transportation Division - Buildiing Division — Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority - County of Simcoe - Development Servpces NleetIng Date August 15, 2013 Application N. 2013 -A -35 Page 2 of 5 Page 53 of 106 5.d) 2013 -A -35 (Claudio and Milena Del Duca), 2285 Lakeshore... IATTACHMENTS: Schedule 1: Location Map Schedule 2: Elevation Schedule 3: Site Plan CONCLUSION: Planning staff recommends that Variance Application 2013 -A -35 be approved, specifically, to permit the construction of a single detached dwelling and attached garage, since the application appears to meet the four tests of the Planning Act. Respectfully sub •tted: Adrianna S Planner • no a Reviewed by: !alt Derek Witlib, MCIP, RPP Manager, Planning Services Development Services Meeting Date August 15, 2013 Application No. 2013 -A -35 Page 3 of 5 Page 54 of 106 5.d) 2013 -A -35 (Claudio and Milena Del Duca), 2285 Lakeshore... SCHEDULE 1: LOCATION MAP 2013 -A -35 (DelDuca) _now= torwar 111 SUBJECT PROPERTY (2285 Lakeshore Road East) SCHEDULE 2: ELEVATION 2012 -A -35 (DelDuca) .114, nabl Lpiumilm : 4 Development Services Meeting Date August 15, 2013 Application No. 2013 -A -35 Page 4 of 5 Page 55 of 106 5.d) 2013 -A -35 (Claudio and Milena Del Duca), 2285 Lakeshore... SCHEDULE 3: SITE PLAN 2013 -A -35 (DelDuca) 2285 LAKESHORE OR ,60'2 COLVERT DRILLED WELL EXISTING RAISED BUNGALOW DECK 1.5 Mt NEW WELL 43'10 A DRIVEWAY �I to r.s m EEPIC TANK PORT OLD COTTAGE TO BE TAKEN NSW; r — 4 OLD DECK PROPOSED NEW S PTIC DECK SLOPE high water mark GARAGE LIVING AREA M srowrt RAISED BUNGALOW DECK DEL DUCA MINOR VARIANCE 602 — LAKE SIMCOE Development Services Meeting Date August 15, 2013 Application No. 2013 -A -35 Page 5 of 5 Page 56 of 106 5.d) 2013 -A -35 (Claudio and Milena Del Duca), 2285 Lakeshore... ormosswarawarelyacant v� 1 MitteXAMISAMSVMMATMEI F67�+3�areirw r.-.r -�s� � � •r.,.._ rt��+trL`.''S�I �ewAp., :�.7 Page 57 of 106 5.d) 2013 -A -35 (Claudio and Milena Del Duca), 2285 Lakeshore... Page 58 of 106 5.d) 2013 -A -35 (Claudio and Milena Del Duca), 2285 Lakeshore... Page 59 of 106 5.d) 2013 -A -35 (Claudio and Milena Del Duca), 2285 Lakeshore... Page 60 of 106 5.d) 2013 -A -35 (Claudio and Milena Del Duca), 2285 Lakeshore... Page 61 of 106 5.d) 2013 -A -35 (Claudio and Milena Del Duca), 2285 Lakeshore... Page 62 of 106 5.d) 2013 -A -35 (Claudio and Milena Del Duca), 2285 Lakeshore... Page 63 of 106 5.d) 2013 -A -35 (Claudio and Milena Del Duca), 2285 Lakeshore... Page 64 of 106 5.d) 2013 -A -35 (Claudio and Milena Del Duca), 2285 Lakeshore... Page 65 of 106 5.d) 2013 -A -35 (Claudio and Milena Del Duca), 2285 Lakeshore... Lake Simcoe Region conservation authority Wednesday, August 14, 2013 Andria Leigh, MCIP, RPP Secretary- Treasurer Committee of Adjustment Township of Oro - Medonte Oro, Ontario LOL 2X0 Dear Ms. Leigh, Re: Application for Minor Variance File 2013 -A -35 (Del Duca) 2285 Lakeshore Road East Township of Oro - Medonte, County of Simcoe S Of A Watershed for Lif:, *By email only* Thank you for circulating this application for minor variance to the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority (LSRCA) for our review. The subject property is located along the shoreline of Lake Simcoe that contains an associated steep slope. As a result, the proposed redevelopment is located within the erosion hazard limit of Lake Simcoe. On this basis, we recommend that any approval of this application be subject to the following conditions: 1. That the owner shall obtain a permit from the LSRCA under Ontario Regulation 179/06 prior to the issuance of a municipal building permit, 2. That the owner shall pay the minor variance review fee of $200 to the LSRCA. 3. That a geotechnical evaluation (letter report) be prepared to the satisfaction of the LSRCA for the proposed dwelling and sewage disposal system. The purpose of the geotechnical evaluation is to ensure that the existing steep slope will be stable in a post - development situation. Pleas:dvise us of your decision. 1 ss, MCIP, RPP Coordinator Copy: LSRCA, Taylor Stevenson 120 Bayview Parkway, Box 282 I Tel: 905,895,1281 1.800.465.0437 Newmarket, Ontario L3Y 4X1 i Fax: 905.853.5881 Proud winner of the international Thiess Riverprize Web: www.LSRCA.on.ca. E-Mail: Info @LSRCA.on.ca Mernb�r of Conservation Ontario Page 66 of 106 5.e) 2013 -A -36 (John Wigle and Aimee Bowles), 13 Grandview C... Page 67 of 106 ti TOWNNHOP OF ORO4 iIGCnNTE %i©l o.9edo Application N• : 2013 =A -35 TTo: Committed of Acqustmerut Prepared Cry: Derek Witlifb, i er, Piannkg Services Motion # Meeting Date: August 15, 2013 &bleat: Variance Application (J. ' Vi jle A. Bowies) 13 Grandview Crescent Lot 4, Registered Plan 935 (Former Township of Oro) Roil #: 4346-010-009-61 }00 R.M.S. Bole #: D113 -46139 HEMMED CC®NDlTi®NS: The following conditions are required to be imposed on the Committee's decision: 1. That, notwithstanding Table B1 (Minimum Front Yard) and Section 5.31 (Setback from Lake Simcoe) of Zoning By -law 97 -95, the proposed single detached dwelling shall otherwise comply with all other applicable provisions of the Zoning By -Law; 2. That the buildings and structures on the property be generally in conformity with the dimensions as set out on the application and sketches submitted and approved by the Committee; 3. That the applicant obtain any permits and /or approvals required, from the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority; and 4. That the appropriate zoning certificate and building permit be obtained from the Township only after the Committee's decision becomes final and binding, as provided for within the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c. P. 13. BACKGROUND: The subject property currently supports a single detached dwelling with a deck, 2 sheds and a boathouse, on a lot comprising an area of approximately 0.14 hectares (0.35 acres) and with a frontage along Grandview Crescent of approximately 30 metres (100 feet). The variances have been requested to accommodate the replacement of the single detached dwelling and deck. ANALYSIS: The applicant is requesting the following relief from Zoning By-law 97 -95: Zone: Shoreline Residential iSR Zone Required Proposed) Table B1 — Minimum Front Yard 7.5 metres 0.0 Metres Section 5.31 — Setback from Average High Water Mark of Lake Simcoe 20.0 metres 15.0 metres Development Services Rileeting Dane August 15, 2013 AplpDBcatlovo No. 2013 -A-36 Page 1 of 7 Page 67 of 106 5.e) 2013 -A -36 (John Wigle and Aimee Bowles), 13 Grandview C... Page 68 of 106 FDNANCDAL: Not applicable. POUCO S /ILIEMSLATMlylo Does the variance conform to the general Intent of the Official Plan? The subject lands are designated Shoreline in the Township's Official Plan, and Section C5 of the Official Plan contains policies related to the use and development of lands in this designation. In Section C5.1 of the Official Plan the stated objectives of the Shoreline designation are: 0 To maintain the existing character of the predominantly residential area. 0 To protect the natural features of the shoreline area and the immediate shoreline. To ensure that existing development is appropriately serviced with water and sewer services. Single detached dwellings generally permitted by the Official Plan. Planning Staff notes that although Grandview Avenue is a relatively narrow road, it is located within a full 20 metres (66 feet) wide road allowance and there is a substantially wide municipal boulevard located between the road and the existing properties on the south side of Grandview Avenue. As a result, even though the applicants are requesting a front yard setback of 0 metres for the proposed attached garage, the building would still be substantially setback (approximately 10 metres or 33 feet) from the edge of Grandview Avenue. Driveway space would be provided within this boulevard area and, in Planning Staff's opinion, the attractiveness and character of the streetscape would be maintained with no negative impacts on the neighbourhood. With respect to the requested variance to the setback from Lake Simcoe, Planning Staff notes the proposed dwelling would still maintain a setback from the lake similar to the setbacks of other existing dwellings along that portion of the shoreline. In so far as the impact that this application may have on the natural features of the shoreline, Planning Staff notes that no changes to the shoreline are proposed. However, since the shoreline area is subject to regulation by the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority ( LSRCA), the Committee should have regard to any comments that may be received from the LSRCA with respect to this application Based on the above, the requested variances are considered to conform to the Official Plan. Does the v.: riance meet the general intent of the Zoning By-law, and is the variance appropriate for the desirable development of the lot? The subject property is zoned Shoreline Residential (SR) according to the Township's Zoning Sy -law 97 -95. A single detached dwelling is a permitted use in this zone. The applicants are requesting a front yard setback of 0 metres, specifically for the garage which is to be attached to the dwelling, whereas the Zoning By-law requires a minimum setback of 7.5 metres (25 feet). The purpose of the Zoning By-law's front yard setback is to provide space for landscaped front yards which contribute to the appearance of the streetscape, as well as to accommodate driveways in the front yard. The Zoning By-law requires a minimum of 2 parking spaces on the Deveiopunent Services fleeting Date August 15, 2013 Appiicetion No. 2013 -A -36 (Page 2 of 7 Page 68 of 106 5.e) 2013 -A -36 (John Wigle and Aimee Bowles), 13 Grandview C... Page 69 of 106 subject and applicants are proposing to satisfy that requirement by way of the 2 parking spaces inside the proposed 2 -car garage. Therefore the variance, if approved, would still satisfy the Zoning By- law's parking requirement. However, notwithstanding that vehicles can be parked in a garage, driveways provide residential properties with a location to park vehicle outside of a garage for the purposes of convenience, maintenance and loading. In this context, the applicants' requested variance to the front yard must be considered in term of is desirability for the lot. Although the lands would still benefit from approximately 10 metres of driveway length within the municipal road allowance and outside of the paved portion of Grandview Avenue, there is the potential for some of this driveway area to be lost in the event that the Township should someday widen the paved surface of the road. In this respect, the Committee should have regard to any comments that may be received from the Township's Transportation Division. The subject lands are currently accessed by way of two existing driveway entrances connecting a horseshoe - shaped driveway. Although the proposed development of the lands would eliminate the horseshoe - shaped driveway, additional parking on the property would be maintained by keeping the westerly portion of the driveway as shown on the applicant's site plan as a parking area. The Transportation Division may have comments on the driveway entrances, which the Committee should have regard to. With respect to the requested variance to the setback from Lake Simcoe from 20 metres to 15 metres, Planning Staff has no objections, subject to concurrence from the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority. Based on the above, Planning Staff is of the opinion that the application maintains the general intent of the Zoning By -law and is appropriate for the desirable development of the lot. fs ithe variance miIio ? As the proposed variances are considered to conform to the general intent of the Official Plan, to meet the general intent of the Zoning By -Law, to be appropriate for the desirable development of the lot, the variances are considered to be minor. CONSULTATIO 11S: o Environmental Services Division — o Transportation Division - o Building Division — Septic installed new in 2010 and will be relocated as part of this proposal. Engineered lot grading required o County of Simcoe — o Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority — ATTACHMENTS: Schedule 1: Location Map Development Services Meeting Date August 15, 2013 Application No. 2013 -A -36 Pave 3 of 7 Page 69 of 106 5.e) 2013 -A -36 (John Wigle and Aimee Bowles), 13 Grandview C... Schedule 2: Site Plan Schedule 3: Elevations ICONCLUSION: Planning Staff recommends that Minor Variance Application 2013 -A -36 be approved, specifically, to permit the construction of single detached dwelling with a deck, for the reason that the variances appear to meet the four tests of the Planning Act. Respectfully submitted: ./b4 Derek Witlib, MCIP, RPP Manager, Planning Services Development Services Meeting Date August 15, 2013 Application No. 2013 -A -36 Page 4 of 7 Page 70 of 106 5.e) 2013 -A -36 (John Wigle and Aimee Bowles), 13 Grandview C... SCHEDULE DULL 1: LOCATDON MAP 2013-A-36 igFa 13 Miss) Development SeMces (Meeting Date August 15, 20113 pp catoon Nlo, 2013-A-36 Page 5 o4 7 Page 71 of 106 5.e) 2013 -A -36 (John Wigle and Aimee Bowles), 13 Grandview C... A S N D V F W SCHEDULE 2: VICE PLAN 2013-A-36 Qwu& & Bowles) G R A N D V I E VI PE43r[CU nJdJ 4.u. ]0.,)m ,3. CRESCENT pax , •c,: y/ + R D A 0 �'� -REMO 4E FM1+M 4 CEDNI eEKN _.px we 5 1G� OfPM Pa 2/a re 304+e H77 Y1N sEOPC+ OWN ONELNG LOT 3 7,4r032 - UA02 REGISTERED E6N L 18 ow _ 4 4 ado N- s y- 1 Ii1 Ivuu t . nx I PLAN waN ;.k.:•• LOT -- 4 11.3 14032– 51,\ NesaNsalic miTM Mau ON NON OEM), Walt In. P 1OP Of GOKA'L Oab: OM LOT 5 pw, 1. 1-01Q4 439 WG a 9iaaNYlSt..r ~i • A e •'` . -w ars trae war & w+s zw. a (0..2e.210. Es Lint 0.r 4. soes L A K E Stltc0E 935 Development Services Meeting Date r'Sangaasa 15, 2013 Application Igo. 2 013 =A -36 Page 6 of 7 Page 72 of 106 5.e) 2013 -A -36 (John Wigle and Aimee Bowles), 13 Grandview C... NO AIM SCHEDULE 3: EILEEVAT ONS 2013-A-33 Nowise) 9 ®®® — iir P sis i ii i oi.:.'i, � 'L _U111 i �u jrjfr MO •.h �1� - m 111 IUaaiaVUaaaaaia NS RN L• mil me ai u n N 5a TAT IYs�anrlI 1111 111,11 111111 01.111rIlan SOM. non. WINFICAI MOM Ma AVM WAIF ®evepopponen t Services Meeting g Date August 15, 20113 Apxppooatrpon Flo. 2 013 =A =36 Page 7 of 7 Page 73 of 106 5.e) 2013 -A -36 (John Wigle and Aimee Bowles), 13 Grandview C... Page 74 of 106 5.e) 2013 -A -36 (John Wigle and Aimee Bowles), 13 Grandview C... Page 75 of 106 5.e) 2013 -A -36 (John Wigle and Aimee Bowles), 13 Grandview C... Page 76 of 106 5.e) 2013 -A -36 (John Wigle and Aimee Bowles), 13 Grandview C... Page 77 of 106 5.e) 2013 -A -36 (John Wigle and Aimee Bowles), 13 Grandview C... Page 78 of 106 5.e) 2013 -A -36 (John Wigle and Aimee Bowles), 13 Grandview C... Page 79 of 106 5.e) 2013-A-36 (John Wig le and Aimee Bowles), 13 Grandview C... Page 80 of 106 5.e) 2013 -A -36 (John Wigle and Aimee Bowles), 13 Grandview C... Page 81 of 106 5.e) 2013 -A -36 (John Wigle and Aimee Bowles), 13 Grandview C... Page 82 of 106 5.e) 2013 -A -36 (John Wigle and Aimee Bowles), 13 Grandview C... Page 83 of 106 5.e) 2013 -A -36 (John Wigle and Aimee Bowles), 13 Grandview C... Page 84 of 106 5.e) 2013 -A -36 (John Wigle and Aimee Bowles), 13 Grandview C... Page 85 of 106 5.e) 2013 -A -36 (John Wigle and Aimee Bowles), 13 Grandview C... Page 86 of 106 5.e) 2013 -A -36 (John Wigle and Aimee Bowles), 13 Grandview C... ' amuses imindmiurrt 1•11■• t:1111 III Page 87 of 106 5.e) 2013 -A -36 (John Wigle and Aimee Bowles), 13 Grandview C... cAkt-AA, cAva, Mr. Robert Williams 15 Grandview Cres RR 1 Oro Station ON LOL 2E0 ! 3 Q-,- 'e,v\..c v "S 2-6 'A, 1: vc o,/ Ajo (&D CKL111-- 110 tAi &-‘3-L) x-95 6 --LAkAA. ete, or zo--ek-6(1 RECEIVED AUG U 8 .2Ut ORO-MEDON TE TOWNSHIP Page 88 of 106 5.e) 2013 -A -36 (John Wigle and Aimee Bowles), 13 Grandview C... Lake Simcoe Region conservation authority Wednesday, August 14, 2013 Andria Leigh, MCIP, RPP Secretary- Treasurer Committee of Adjustment Township of Oro - Medonte Oro, Ontario LOL 2X0 Dear Ms. Leigh, Re: Application for Minor Variance File 2013 -A -36 (Wigle /Bowles) 13 Grandview Crescent Township of Oro - Medonte, County of Simcoe A Watershed for *By email only* Thank you for circulating this application for minor variance to the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority (LSRCA) for our review. As you are aware, the property is located along the shoreline of Lake Simcoe. On this basis, we recommend that any approval of this application be subject to the following conditions: 1. That the owner shall obtain a permit from the LSRCA under Ontario Regulation 179/06 prior to the issuance of a municipal building permit. 2. That the owner shall pay the minor variance review fee of $200 to the LSRCA. Through the permit process, a geotechnical evaluation may be required in order to assess the proposed development in relation to the erosion hazard limit of Lake Simcoe (e.g. top -of- bank). Please, vise us of your decision. Si Cha I F. Bu jge , MCIP, RPP Senio Planpi g ordinator /cfb Copy: LSRCA, Taylor Stevenson 120 Bayview Parkway, Box 282 I Tel: 905.895.1281 1.800.465.0437 I Web: www.LSRCA.on.ca Newmarket, Ontario L3Y 4X1 I Fax: 905.853.5881 I E -Mail: Info ©LSRCA.on.ca Proud winner of the International Thiess Riverprize Wlernber of Conservation Ontario Page 89 of 106 5.f) 2013 -A -37 (Robert and Lisa Bickle), 811 Line 9 South, R... C T cp ykekirite 1,11511d k,r.,ins r-a»,n. TOWNSHIP OF ORO- MEDONTE REPORT Application No: 2013 -A -37 To: Committee of Adjustment Prepared By: Derek Witlib, Manager, Planning Services Meeting Date: August 15, 2013 Subject: Variance Application (R. & L. Bickle) 811 Line 9 South Lot 1 Registered Plan 863 (Former Township of Oro) Motion # Roll #: 4346- 010 - 010 -02100 _ R.M.S. File #: D13 46140 IREQUIRED CONDITIONS: The following conditions are required to be imposed on the Committee's decision: 1. That, notwithstanding Table B1 (Minimum Front Yard and Minimum Side Yard) of Zoning By -law 97 -95, the proposed boathouse shall otherwise comply with all other applicable provisions of the Zoning By -Law; 2. That the buildings and structures on the property be generally in conformity with the dimensions as set out on the application and sketches submitted and approved by the Committee; 3. That the applicant obtain any permits and /or approvals required, from the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority; and 4. That the appropriate zoning certificate and building permit be obtained from the Township only after the Committee's decision becomes final and binding, as provided for within the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P. 13. BACKGROUND: The subject property currently supports a single detached dwelling and a shed on a lot comprising an area of approximately 0.09 hectares (0.23 acres) and with a frontage along Line 9 South of approximately 59 metres (194 feet). The property also includes an associated water lot extending into Lake Simcoe. The variances have been requested to accommodate the construction of a boathouse. IANALYSIS: The applicant is requesting the following relief from Zoning By -law 97 -95: Zone: Shoreline Residential (SR) Table B1 — Minimum Front Yard Table B1 — Minimum Side Yard (Lake Simcoe) Required Proposed 7.5 metres 1.0 metres 2.0 metres 1.4 metres IFINANCIAL: Not applicable. Development Services Application No. 2013 -A -37 Meeting Date August 15, 2013 Page 1 of 7 Page 90 of 106 5.f) 2013 -A -37 (Robert and Lisa Bickle), 811 Line 9 South, R... POLICIES /LEGISLATION: Does the variance conform to the general intent of the Official Plan? The subject lands are designated Shoreline in the Township's Official Plan, and Section C5 of the Official Plan contains policies related to the use and development of lands in this designation. In Section C5.1 of the Official Plan the stated objectives of the Shoreline designation are: • To maintain the existing character of the predominantly residential area. • To protect the natural features of the shoreline area and the immediate shoreline. • To ensure that existing development is appropriately serviced with water and sewer services. Residential uses, including accessory buildings such as boathouses are generally permitted by the Official Plan. Planning Staff notes that the proposed boathouse is to be located entirely on the applicant's property and is intended to replace an existing shed which currently encroaches on the municipal road allowance. Planning Staff considers this to be an improvement over the existing situation and, in Planning Staff's opinion, the requested variances would not negatively impact the character of the existing residential area or the natural features of the shoreline. The proposed development has no impacts on servicing. Based on the above, the requested variances are considered to conform to the Official Plan. Does the variance meet the general intent of the Zoning By -law, and is the variance appropriate for the desirable development of the lot? The subject property is zoned Shoreline Residential (SR) according to the Township's Zoning By -law 97 -95. A boathouse accessory to a single detached dwelling is a permitted use in this zone. The requested variance to allow the boathouse to be positioned 1 metre from the front lot line would be an improvement over the existing situation which consists of a shed that encroaches on the municipal road allowance. The proposed 1 metre setback would still allow for access and maintenance around the building. The proposed location of the boathouse would also allow the applicant to position a marine railway within the associated water lot. The requested variance to permit a 1.4 metres side yard adjacent to Lake Simcoe, whereas a minimum of 2 metres is currently required, represents a technicality resulting from the orientation and position of the lot at the juncture of Line 9 South and Lake Simcoe. Normally the Zoning By -law does not require a setback from Lake Simcoe for a boathouse. Based on the above, Planning Staff is of the opinion that the application maintains the general intent of the Zoning By -law and is appropriate for the desirable development of the lot. Is the variance minor? As the proposed variances are considered to conform to the general intent of the Official Plan, to meet the general intent of the Zoning By -Law, to be appropriate for the desirable development of the lot, the variances are considered to be minor. Development Services Meeting Date August 15, 2013 Application No. 2013 -A -37 Page 2 of 7 Page 91 of 106 5.f) 2013 -A -37 (Robert and Lisa Bickle), 811 Line 9 South, R... ICONSULTATIONS: • Environmental Services Division — • Transportation Division - • Building Division — Grades at west property line affected by new construction to be addressed at time of building permit. • County of Simcoe — • Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority — IATTACHMENTS: Schedule 1: Location Map Schedule 2: Site Plan (Existing) Schedule 3: Site Plan (Proposed) Schedule 4: Elevations ICONCLUSION: Planning Staff recommends that Minor Variance Application 2013 -A -37 be approved, specifically, to permit the construction of a boathouse, for the reason that the variances appear to meet the four tests of the Planning Act. Respectfully submitted: .,V4__ Derek Witlib, MCIP, RPP Manager, Planning Services SMT Approval / Comments: --'-d--' C.A.O. Approval / Comments: Development Services Meeting Date August 15, 2013 Application No. 2013 -A -37 Page 3 of 7 Page 92 of 106 5.f) 2013 -A -37 (Robert and Lisa Bickle), 811 Line 9 South, R... SCHEDULE 1: LOCATION MAP 2013 -A -37 (Bickle) Development Services Meeting Date August 15, 2013 Application No. 2013 -A -37 Page 4 of 7 Page 93 of 106 5.f) 2013 -A -37 (Robert and Lisa Bickle), 811 Line 9 South, R... SCHEDULE 2: SITE PLAN (EXISTING) 2013 -A -37 (Bickle) it 3 n!MtIIMIEMM- WPORRARR5 =WRY Q PART Or LOT 1 REGISTERED PLAN 863 GEOGMPHIC TOMS. OF oRO TOWNSHIP OF ORO— NEDONTE COUNTY OF SIMCOE BOME 1 : 150 RUDY MAR M R6E1i10 LTD. EEM=e aeM AID sE NAM MK MO asNO<. OI IBM MIS ¢ e i01116.D0II nis aM Ma A EUfi s �e vn B195M. Mm Msrwulm MAW MA MAME oa a MAME AEI ML 5 sE a MOM aMPIGMMAILI ACME AMP OEM nL 801 ME ICBM MI®00ILE.1 b• MAMIE ®uMergarsps, OU1Ma v Mao OS9 WM WEI MOM MICI OEM Ma Im!!!! MEM MEMO ES IOU MOM n ImMI AYE MOP. OT ILIEEISOMID I 11610012071 UL =MI OF IM 4DE0 MA MEW AIM MAO PIM OWw1u ■ b MEWL ME PO EOM 17l00 N 1M OPI COlsaaa "IRMA? APE MAY MAW r saw Re esa LMS1 s SEAM POUANON EICALEIl ' 4- AMA MI I Fa! WEEP emus 08 MM loosed MI M OMB OM d0 - - ALUM - ELMS PM 0. nom, 01S PO MOOS WM a0.®O OM 0)® AMANY 2[O Q law OMUOM mac Mp� ®q�pl�p llgry d0B IDIMOY tea MI OMELEIRAORREISTIEPOIDEARILWaim 620 Oer BA MO MAY PCIII E AO 505. COMP L0! 50 p¢ E-MAIL a5LOYY0a8EM MAD _11421 MM Ir PEE Development Services Meeting Date August 15, 2013 Application No. 2013 -A -37 Page 5 of 7 Page 94 of 106 5.f) 2013-A-37 (Robert and Lisa Bickle), 811 Line 9 South, R... SCHEDULE 3: SITE PLAN (PROPOSED) 2013-A-37 (Bickle) BOATHOUSE ZONING alw SR oTnmN1 030 00rt 0ain▪ na▪ t MOSS MO. 00 0 .1 000.01.1 0.2 30.00 7.5 7.5 0112.07E0 011 53. .42 2.0 41— 23.73 41.03 150 aro 4.5 STRUCTURE DESIGN PI.00t 610 oe, smome 220.15 roa oFFounnocnon vo, to, 000.06 0 POO 10101 00.10.41.11.00•SOVE 220.38 219 95 4.5m MUNICIPAL ADDRESS 811 LINE 9 SOUTH AN'Arcom LEGEND 000000 000 PROF05.0 8.00.0.01 01. PROP. .101.00F 8100 001,0 .00¢. 0E0 eLfS0 0.00 -^",, Emma TM. 07 P52r.0053.yxr GENERAL NOTES nu.:41tre° rtt BENCHMARK 'IS411"1"Z rnnf :onsulting group, inc. 2r rrr., 7yu, x3: L‘D PENG STAMP PROPOSED NEW 4.88rn 0 8.5301 BOAT HOUSE PROPO-WO WARNE RAILWAY LOT GRADING NPIIEW 0,10.. OFT. 1000 [00071- NAM .0 0 AcCIRACy 0 K. c0/00.0 Wrilf 1000000.001300 armaNGAGE0.0.1... 111140.0,Bal 811 9th LINE SOUTH PART 1, PLAN 51R-5524PHASE 1 BOB AND LISA SICKLE TOWNSHIP OF ORO MEDONTE SCALE: 1500 DWG. NO, DATE: JULY 2, Oro DRAVA, 58 SP DESIGNED. Development Services Meeting Date August 15, 2013 Application No. 2013-A-37 Page 6 of 7 Page 95 of 106 5.f) 2013 -A -37 (Robert and Lisa Bickle), 811 Line 9 South, R... SCHEDULE 4: ELEVATIONS 2013 -A -37 (Bickle) II Development Services Application No. 2013 -A -37 Meeting Date August 15, 2013 Page 7 of 7 Page 96 of 106 5.f) 2013-A-37 (Robert and Lisa Bickle), 811 Line 9 South, R... Page 97 of 106 5.f) 2013 -A -37 (Robert and Lisa Bickle), 811 Line 9 South, R... Page 98 of 106 5.f) 2013 -A -37 (Robert and Lisa Bickle), 811 Line 9 South, R... Page 99 of 106 5.f) 2013 -A -37 (Robert and Lisa Bickle), 811 Line 9 South, R... Page 100 of 106 5.f) 2013 -A -37 (Robert and Lisa Bickle), 811 Line 9 South, R... Page 101 of 106 5.f) 2013 -A -37 (Robert and Lisa Bickle), 811 Line 9 South, R... Page 102 of 106 5.f) 2013 -A -37 (Robert and Lisa Bickle), 811 Line 9 South, R... Page 103 of 106 5.f) 2013 -A -37 (Robert and Lisa Bickle), 811 Line 9 South, R... Page 104 of 106 5.f) 2013 -A -37 (Robert and Lisa Bickle), 811 Line 9 South, R... Lake Simcoe Region conservation authority A Watershed for Wednesday, August 14, 2013 Andria Leigh, MCIP, RPP Secretary- Treasurer Committee of Adjustment Township of Oro - Medonte Oro, Ontario LOL 2X0 Dear Ms. Leigh, Re: Application for Minor Variance File 2013A-37 (Bickle) 811 Line 9 South Township of Oro - Medonte, County of Simcoe *By email only* Thank you for circulating this application for minor variance to the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority (LSRCA) for our review. Given that the property is located along the shoreline of Lake Simcoe, we recommend that any approval of this application be subject to the following conditions: 1. That the owner shall obtain a permit from the LSRCA under Ontario Regulation 179/06 prior to the issuance of a municipal building permit, 2. That 6.8 -DP and 6.9 -DP of the Lake Simcoe Protection Plan shall be fulfilled. 3. That the owner shall pay the minor variance review fee of $200 to the LSRCA. 4. That the owner shall register a restrictive covenant on the subject lands under the Conservation Land Act. The purpose of the restrictive covenant is to help maintain any vegetated riparian area along Lake Simcoe and to recognize that the proposed boathouse may be subject to coastal hazards such as wave uprush and potential ice piling. Please .. ise us of your decision. Sin ere Char • '. 6u ge.., MCIP, RPP Senior rIanaing coordinator Copy: LS CA, Taylor Stevenson 120 Bayview Parkway, Box 282 Tel: 905.895.1281 1.801465.0437 Web; www.LSRCA.on.ca Newmarket, Ontario L3Y 4X1 Fax: 905.853.5881 E -Mail: info ©SRCA.on.ca Proud winner of the International Thiess Riverprize Member of Conservation Ontario Page 105 of 106 6.b) 2013 Ontario Association of Committees of Adjustment an... Township of ISA 4 Proud Heritage, Exciting Future 2013 OACA FALL SEMINAR HORSESHOE RESORT SEPTEMBER 19TH AND 20TH 2013 "THE HILLS ARE ALIVE" Thursday September 19th 4:00 p.m. — 8:00 p.m. 7:00 p.m. — 10:00 p.m. Friday September 20th 7:45 a.m. — 8:45 a.m. 7:30 a.m. — 8:45 a.m. 8:45 a.m. — 9:00 a.m. AGENDA Registration — Hotel Lobby Meet and Greet Reception — Fireside Lounge, Hotel Lobby Registration — Hotel Lobby Breakfast — Alpine Room Opening Remarks — Alpine Room • Andreas Petersen, OACA President • Mayor Harry Hughes, Township of Oro - Medonte • Deb McCabe, Seminar Chair 9:15 a.m. — 10:30 a.m. Workshops 10:30 a.m. — 10:45 a.m. Nutrition Break 10:45 a.m. — Noon Workshops Noon — 1:00 p.m. Lunch — Alpine Room 1:00 p.m. to 1:45 p.m. Keynote Speaker — Jim Foster, Columnist /Humorist 1:45 p.m. to 2:00 p.m. Nutrition Break 2:00 p.m. to 3:15 p.m. Workshops 3:15 p.m. Adjournment — Drive Home Safe or stay and enjoy what Oro - Medonte has to offer! Page 106 of 106