Loading...
11 18 2010 C of A AgendaTHE TOWNSHIP OF ORO- MEDONTE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING AGENDA COUNCIL CHAMBERS Thursday, November 18, 2010 9:30 a.m. Page 1. OPENING OF THE MEETING BY THE CHAIR 2. ADOPTION OF AGENDA a) Motion to adopt the agenda. 3. DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST 4. ADOPTION OF MINUTES 3 -16 a) Motion to adopt the minutes from Committee of Adjustment meeting held on October 21, 2010. 5. PUBLIC MEETINGS: 17 -26 a) 2010 -A -30 - Horseshoe Valley Lands Limited Part of Lots 3 and 4, Concession 4 Temporary Construction and Sales (proposal to construct two model homes). 27 -54 b) 2010 -A -31 - Georgian Equipment (Catherine Jo -Anne and George Armstrong Thompson) 21 Patterson Road, Plan 1719, RP 51 R -9538, Part 1 (Former Township of Orillia) Relief from Minimum Interior Side Yard Setback. 55 -75 c) 2010 -13-32 - Angela McCuaig, Kevin McLean & Donald McLean 1051 Line 3 North, Part Lot 14, Concession 4 Permit a lot addition /boundary adjustment. 76 -98 d) 2010 -13-33 - Fraser Hardy McConney 170 15/16 Sideroad East, Concession 8, Lot 16 Technical severance to create a lot which once existed as a separate parcel of land. 99 -110 e) 2010 -A -38 - Donald Leroux North Side of Mount Saint Louis, East of Highway 400, Part of Lot 10, Concession 8 Relief from Maximum Floor Area and Timing of Construction. 111 -133 f) 2010 -A -39 - Meghan Church, Caitlin Hussey, Kathleen Sutherland 53 Eight Mile Point Road, Plan 780, Lot 26 (Former Town of Orillia) Relief from Minimum Interior Side Yard Setback. Page 1 of 274 Page 5. PUBLIC MEETINGS: 134 -171 g ) 2010 -A -40 - Taras Sakharevych 61 Eight Mile Point Road, Plan 780, Lot 30 (Former Town of Orillia) Relief from Minimum Interior Side Yard Setback. 172 -199 h) 2010 -A -42 - Cory Venable and Danielle Park 4 Georgina Drive, Lot 8, Plan 1561 Relief from Minimum Interior Side Yard Setback. 200 -236 i) 2010 -A -43 - James Rogers 79 Stanley Avenue, Plan 626, Lot 105, (Former Township of Oro) Minimum Front Yard, Minimum Exterior Side Yard, Sight Lines on a Corner Lot and Setbacks for Driveways. 237 -274 j) 2010 -A -44 - McDougall Auto Wreckers 328 Line 14 North, Part Lot 14, Concession 14 Relief from Fence Height deemed not to be a Structure. 6. NEW BUSINESS: None. 7. NEXT MEETING DATE Thursday, December 16, 2010 at 9:30 a.m. 8. ADJOURNMENT a) Motion to adjourn. Page 2 of 274 4a) - Motion to adopt the minutes from Com... THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO- MEDONTE - COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT T, hi 1• MEETING MINUTES Council Chambers Proud Heritage, Exciting Farwr Thursday, October 21, 2010 Time: 9:40 a.m. Present: Bruce Chappell, Chair Lynda Aiken Roy Hastings Garry Potter Regrets: Michelle Lynch Staff present: Steven Farquharson, Secretary Treasurer /Intermediate Planner Alan Wiebe, Planner Marie Brissette, Deputy Secretary Treasurer /Committee Coordinator 1. OPENING OF THE MEETING BY THE CHAIR Bruce Chappell assumed the Chair and called the meeting to order. 2. ADOPTION OF AGENDA a) Motion to adopt the agenda. Motion No. CAI 01021-1 Moved by Aiken, Seconded by Hastings It is recommended that the agenda for the meeting of Thursday, October 21, 2010 be received and adopted. Carried. 3. DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST None declared. 4. ADOPTION OF MINUTES a) Minutes of meeting held on Thursday, September 16, 2010. Motion No. CA101021 -2 Moved by Potter, Seconded by Aiken It is recommended that the minutes of the Committee of Adjustment meeting of Thursday, September 16, 2010 be adopted as presented. Carried. Page 1 of 14 Page 3 of 274 4a) - Motion to adopt the minutes from Com... Committee of Adjustment Minutes — Thursday, October 21, 2010 5. PUBLIC MEETINGS: a) 2010-B-26- UCCI Consolidated Companies Inc. Lot 27, Plan M -187 ( Lot 23, Concession 5) Boundary adjustment. Bryan Davidson, agent, was represent. Motion No. CAI 01021-3 (Amendment) Moved by Potter, Seconded by Hastings It is recommended that the Committee of Adjustment amend the motion for 2010 -13-26 to add a condition, being : 7. And That no vehicular traffic be permitted on the lands to be conveyed." Carried. Motion No. CA101021 -4 Moved by Lynch, Seconded by Hastings It is recommended that the Committee of Adjustment grants provisional approval for Consent Application 2010 -B -26, to permit a boundary adjustment, to convey approximately 0. 10 hectares to be added to the lands to the north. The boundary adjustment will provide a 6 meter wide access to the abutting lands to the north from Winfield Drive, which it to be used as part of the irrigation system for the golf course on the enhanced lands. Subject to the following conditions: 1. That three copies of a Reference Plan for the subject land indicating the severed parcel be prepared by an Ontario Land Surveyor be submitted to the Secretary- Treasurer. 2. That the severed lands be merged in title with CON 5 PT LOTS 26 -28 and that the provisions of Subsection 3 or 5 of Section 50 of The Planning Act apply to any subsequent conveyance or transaction involving the subject lands. 3. That the applicant's solicitor prepare and submit a copy of the proposed conveyance for the parcel severed, for review by the Municipality. 4. That the applicants solicitor provide an undertaking that the severed lands and the lands to be enhanced will merge in title. 5. That the applicant apply for an entrance permit with the Township of Oro - Medonte. 6. That the conditions of consent imposed by the Committee be fulfilled within one year from the date of the giving of the notice. 7. And That no vehicular traffic be permitted on the lands to be conveyed. Defeated (As amended) Page 2 of 14 Page 4 of 274 4a) - Motion to adopt the minutes from Com... Committee of Adjustment Minutes — Thursday, October 21, 2010 Motion No. CA101021 -5 Moved by Aiken, Seconded by Potter It is recommended that the Committee of Adjustment grants provisional approval for Consent Application 2010 -13-26, to permit a boundary adjustment, to convey approximately 0. 10 hectares to be added to the lands to the north. The boundary adjustment will provide a 6 meter wide access to the abutting lands to the north from Winfield Drive, which it to be used as part of the irrigation system for the golf course on the enhanced lands. Subject to the following conditions: 1. That three copies of a Reference Plan for the subject land indicating the severed parcel be prepared by an Ontario Land Surveyor be submitted to the Secretary- Treasurer. 2. That the severed lands be merged in title with CON 5 PT LOTS 26 -28 and that the provisions of Subsection 3 or 5 of Section 50 of The Planning Act apply to any subsequent conveyance or transaction involving the subject lands. 3. That the applicant's solicitor prepare and submit a copy of the proposed conveyance for the parcel severed, for review by the Municipality. 4. That the applicants solicitor provide an undertaking that the severed lands and the lands to be enhanced will merge in title. 5. That the applicant apply for an entrance permit with the Township of Oro - Medonte. 6. And That the conditions of consent imposed by the Committee be fulfilled within one year from the date of the giving of the notice. Carried. Page 3 of 14 Page 5 of 274 4a) - Motion to adopt the minutes from Com... Committee of Adjustment Minutes — Thursday, October 21, 2010 b) 2010 -B -06 -Coulson Ridge Estates Ltd Concession 7, Lot 3 (Former Township of Oro) Technical severance to create a lot which once existed as a separate parcel of land. Bill Stohkus, agent, was present. Shirley Partridge provided clarification on the timeline that the merge occurred. Motion No. CA101021 -6 Moved by Potter, Seconded by Hastings That the Committee of Adjustment approves Consent Application 2010 -B -06, subject to the following conditions: 1. That three copies of a Reference Plan for the subject land indicating the severed parcel be prepared by an Ontario Land Surveyor and submitted to the Secretary- Treasurer. 2. That the applicant's solicitor prepare and submit a copy of the proposed conveyance for the parcel severed, for review by the Municipality; Furthermore, the legal description and the parcel description of the recreated parcels be identical to that contained in the original deed and must be so designated on a Reference Plan to be provided by the Applicant. 3. And That the conditions of consent imposed by the Committee be fulfilled within one year from the date of the giving of the notice. Carried. Page 4 of 14 Page 6 of 274 4a) - Motion to adopt the minutes from Com... Committee of Adjustment Minutes — Thursday, October 21, 2010 c) 2010 -B -15 -Robert Drury 661 Penetanguishene Road, Lot 12, Concession 1 (Former Township of Oro) Boundary adjustment. Robert Drury, applicant, was present. Motion No. CA101021 -7 Moved by Potter, Seconded by Aiken That the Committee of Adjustment grants provisional approval for Consent Application 2010 -B -15, to permit a boundary adjustment. The subject land being 661 Penetanguishene Road, to convey an area of approximately 0. 19 hectares (0.46 acres) and is proposed to be added to the adjacent lands being 170 Line 1 North. Subject to the following conditions: 1. That three copies of a Reference Plan for the subject land indicating the severed parcel be prepared by an Ontario Land Surveyor be submitted to the Secretary- Treasurer. 2. That the severed lands be merged in title with 170 Line 1 North and that the provisions of Subsection 3 or 5 of Section 50 of The Planning Act apply to any subsequent conveyance or transaction involving the subject lands. 3. That the applicant's solicitor prepare and submit a copy of the proposed conveyance for the parcel severed, for review by the Municipality. 4. That the applicants solicitor provide an undertaking that the severed lands and the lands to be enhanced will merge in title. 5. That the applicant apply for and obtain a minor variance in order to recognize the existing dwelling as being within the required 30 meter setback from the Environmental Protection (EP) Zone. 6. And That the conditions of consent imposed by the Committee be fulfilled within one year from the date of the giving of the notice. Carried. Page 5 of 14 Page 7 of 274 4a) - Motion to adopt the minutes from Corn Committee of Adjustment Minutes — Thursday, October 21, 2010 d) 2010 -B -29 -Douglas and Catherine Mary Shelswell 2278 15/16 Sideroad East, Concession 14, West Part of Lot 15 Technical severance to create a lot which once existed as a separate parcel of land. Doug Shelswell, applicant, was present. Motion No. CA101021 -8 Moved by Hastings, Seconded by Aiken It is recommended that the Committee of Adjustment grants provisional approval for Consent Application 2010 -13-29, to create a technical severance to create a lot which once existed as a separate parcel of land. The lands proposed to be severed would have approximately 423 metres of frontage along 15/16 Sideroad East, with a lot depth of approximately 617 metres and a lot area of approximately 25 hectares. Subject to the following conditions: 1. That three copies of a Reference Plan for the subject land indicating the severed parcel be prepared by an Ontario Land Surveyor and submitted to the Secretary- Treasurer. 2. That the applicant's solicitor prepare and submit a copy of the proposed conveyance for the parcel severed, for review by the Municipality; Furthermore, the legal description and the parcel description of the recreated parcels be identical to that contained in the original deed and must be so designated on a Reference Plan to be provided by the Applicant. 3. And That the conditions of consent imposed by the Committee be fulfilled within one year from the date of the giving of the notice. Carried. Page 6 of 14 Page 8 of 274 4a) - Motion to adopt the minutes from Com... Committee of Adjustment Minutes — Thursday, October 21, 2010 e) 2010-B-30- Granite Hill Forestry Inc. Block B, Plan 1650, and Block C, Plan M29 Lot addition /boundary adjustment. John Quick, applicant, and Duncan Way, agent, were present. Motion No. CA101021 -9 Moved by Potter, Seconded by Hastings It is recommended that the Committee of Adjustment grants provisional approval for Consent Application 2010 -B -30 is to permit a lot addition /boundary adjustment. The subject land is Part of Block B, Plan 1650, having a depth of approximately 18 metres and an area of approximately 0. 15 hectares. The subject lands are proposed to be added to the adjacent lands to the south (20 Snowshoe Trail). Subject to the following conditions: 1. That three copies of a Reference Plan for the subject land indicating the severed parcel be prepared by an Ontario Land Surveyor be submitted to the Secretary- Treasurer. 2. That the severed lands be merged in title with 20 Snowshoe Trail and that the provisions of Subsection 3 or 5 of Section 50 of The Planning Act apply to any subsequent conveyance or transaction involving the subject lands. 3. That the applicant's solicitor prepare and submit a copy of the proposed conveyance for the parcel severed, for review by the Municipality. 4. That the applicants solicitor provide an undertaking that the severed lands and the lands to be enhanced will merge in title. 5. And That the conditions of consent imposed by the Committee be fulfilled within one year from the date of the giving of the notice. Carried. Page 7 of 14 Page 9 of 274 4a) - Motion to adopt the minutes from Com... Committee of Adjustment Minutes — Thursday, October 21, 2010 f) 2010 -B -31 -Adrian and Tanya McKendry 1202 Bass Lake Sideroad, Part of Lot 5, Concession 4, RP 51 R -17464 Part 1 Create a residential lot by way of severance. Adrian McKendry, applicant, was present. Jim Gray questioned the applicable policies. Motion No. CAI 01021 -10 Moved by Aiken, Seconded by Hastings It is recommended that the Committee of Adjustment grants provisional approval of Consent application 2010 -B -31 is to create a residential lot by way of severance would have a frontage of approximately 121 metres on Bass Lake Sideroad, a depth of approximately 161 metres and an area of approximately 1.97 hectares. Subject to the following conditions: 1. That three copies of a Reference Plan of the subject lands prepared by an Ontario Land Surveyor be submitted to the Committee Secretary- Treasurer. 2. That the maximum total lot area for the severed lot be no greater than approximately 1.97 hectares. 3. That the applicant and the NVCA establish a conservation agreement with an associated Conservation Easement and Restrictive Covenants to be registered on title to ensure long term protection of remaining natural heritage features on the property. 4. That the applicant's solicitor prepare and submit a copy of the proposed conveyance for the parcel severed, for review by the Municipality. 5. That the applicant pay $ 2,000.00 for the lot created as cash -in -lieu of a parkland contribution. 6. That all municipal taxes be paid to the Township of Oro - Medonte. 7. That the conditions of consent imposed by the Committee be fulfilled within one year from the date of the giving of the notice. Carried. Page 8 of 14 Page 10 of 274 4a) - Motion to adopt the minutes from Corn Committee of Adjustment Minutes — Thursday, October 21, 2010 g) 2010 -A -33 - Suzanne Caudry 15 Pemberton Lane, Range 1, East Part Lot 1, Part 7 Relief from maximum total area of deck and boathouse. Bill Thompson, builder, and Zarum, agent, were present. Motion No. CA101021 -11 Moved by Potter, Seconded by Hastings It is recommended that the Committee of Adjustment defers Variance Application 2010 - A-33, to permit the LSRCA to comment. Carried. Page 9 of 14 Page 11 of 274 4a) - Motion to adopt the minutes from Com... Committee of Adjustment Minutes — Thursday, October 21, 2010 h) 2010-A-34- Phil Tuck 33 Robinson Street, Plan 615, West Part Lot B Relief from permitted locations for detached accessory buildings and maximum floor area. Andrew McIntyre, agent, was present. Motion No. CA101021 -12 Moved by Hastings, Seconded by Aiken It is recommended that the Committee of Adjustment approves Variance Application 2010 -A -34, to permit the construction of a detached accessory building in the front yard of the subject property with a floor area of approximately 92.2 square metres (992 square feet) on the subject property. Subject to the following conditions: 1. That notwithstanding Section 5.1.3 a) and 5.1.6 of Zoning By -law 97 -95, the structure shall otherwise comply with all other provisions for detached accessory buildings, as required under Section 5.1 of the Zoning By -law. 2. That the setbacks from the front and interior side lot lines for the detached accessory building be in conformity with Table B1 (minimum required front yard for single detached dwelling), and Section 5.1.3 b) through f), of the Township's Zoning By -Law 97 -95. 3. That the floor area for the detached accessory building, measured as the "total area of all floors in a building, measured between the exterior faces of the exterior walls of the building at each floor level" not exceed approximately 92.2 square metres (992 square feet). 4. That an Ontario Land Surveyor provide verification to the Township of compliance with the Committee's decision by: 1) pinning the footings, and 2) verifying in writing prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit that the floor area of the detached accessory building not exceed approximately 92.2 square metres (992 square feet). 5. That the applicant obtain any permits and /or approvals, if required, from Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority, if applicable. 6. And That the appropriate zoning certificate and building permit be obtained from the Township only after the Committee's decision becomes final and binding, as provided for within the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P. 13. Carried. Page 10 of 14 Page 12 of 274 4a) - Motion to adopt the minutes from Com... Committee of Adjustment Minutes — Thursday, October 21, 2010 i) 2010 -A -35 - K. Koprowicz 1 Sunset Crescent, Plan M469, Part Lot 24 Relief from maximum floor area. Alexander March, agent, was present. Rick Fraracci, neighbour to the applicant and representative of William and Ica Hiles, Michael Goudie, reviewed the correspondence he and other neighbours submitted opposing the application. Ted Burton, neighbour to the applicant and representative of Chris and Marla Vandenberg, Corinne and Walter Bremner, reviewed the correspondence he and other neighbours submitted opposing the application. Motion No. CA101021 -13 Moved by Potter, Seconded by Hastings It is recommended that the Committee of Adjustment denies Variance Application 2010 - A-35, to permit the construction of a detached accessory building occupying a floor area of approximately 129 square metres (1,389 square feet) as it does not meet the four tests of the Planning Act. Carried. Page 11 of 14 Page 13 of 274 4a) - Motion to adopt the minutes from Com... Committee of Adjustment Minutes — Thursday, October 21, 2010 j) 2010 -A -36 -Thomas Edward and Penny Lee Shainline 73 Lakeshore Road West, Lot 16 and 17, Plan 755 Relief from width of a boathouse. Andrew McIntyre, designer, and Tom Shainline, applicant, were present. Motion No. CA101021 -14 Moved by Potter, Seconded by Hastings It is recommended that the Committee of Adjustment approves Variance Application 2010 -A -36 to permit the construction of a boathouse that occupies approximately 32 per cent of the width of the lot at the average high water mark. Subject to the following conditions: 1. That the width of the boathouse, as "measured from the interior faces of the walls of the boathouse ", does not exceed approximately 32 percent "of the width of the lot at the average high water mark" for Lake Simcoe; 2. That an Ontario Land Surveyor provide verification to the Township of compliance with the Committee's decision by: 1) pinning the footings, and 2) verifying in writing prior to pouring of the foundation by way of survey /real property report that the boathouse does not exceed approximately 32 percent of the width of the lot at the average high,water mark; 3. That notwithstanding Section 5.6 c) of Zoning By -law 97 -95, the boathouse shall otherwise comply with all other provisions of the Zoning By -law; 4. That the applicant obtain any permits and /or approvals, if required, from Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority, if applicable; and 5. And That the appropriate zoning certificate and building permit be obtained from the Township only after the Committee's decision becomes final and binding, as provided for within the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P. 13. Carried. Page 12 of 14 Page 14 of 274 4a) - Motion to adopt the minutes from Com... Committee of Adjustment Minutes — Thursday, October 21, 2010 k) 2010 -A -37 -Michael Johnson and Mary Jane Parent 4065 Line 8 North, Concession 9, West Part Lot 6, 51 R656, Part 14 Relief from minimum lot size for an equestrian facility (3 or more horses). Donna Reynolds, agent, and Laurie Latimer, daughter of agent, were present. Patti Clayton reviewed the correspondence she submitted. Motion No. CA101021 -15 Moved by Aiken, Seconded by Potter It is recommended that the Committee of Adjustment approves Variance Application 2010 -A -37, to provide relief from Zoning By -law 97 -95 in permitting an equestrian facility (having 3 or more horses) on the subject property. Subject to the following conditions: 1. That the applicant provide to the Township documentation confirming the size of the property as being no less than approximately 3.55 hectares; 2. That the subject property be used for the keeping of no more than four (4) horses; 3. That, notwithstanding the minimum lot size for an equestrian facility, per Table B4 A of Zoning By -law 97 -95, the use of the subject property shall otherwise comply with all other provisions of the Zoning By -law; 4. That the applicant obtain any permits and /or approvals, if required, from Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority, if applicable; and 5. And That any appropriate zoning certificate(s) and building permit(s) be obtained from the Township only after the Committee's decision becomes final and binding, as provided for within the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P. 13. Carried. Page 13 of 14 Page 15 of 274 4a) - Motion to adopt the minutes from Com... Committee of Adjustment Minutes — Thursday, October 21, 2010 6. NEW BUSINESS: None. 7. NEXT MEETING DATE Thursday, November 18, 2010 8. ADJOURNMENT a) Motion to adjourn. Motion No. CA100515 -16 Moved by Aiken, Seconded by Hastings It is recommended that we do now adjourn at 2:08 p.m. Carried. Bruce Chappell, Chair Steven Farquharson, Secretary Treasurer Page 14 of 14 Page 16 of 274 5a) - 2010 -A -30 - Horseshoe Valley Lands L... TOWNSHIP OF ORO- MEDONTE TO: Committee of Adjustment FROM: Alan Webe DATE: November 18, 2010 SUBJECT HORSESHOE VALLEY LANDS LIMITED APPLICATION FOR MINOR VARIANCE -- 2010 -A -30 PART OF LOTS 3 AND 4, CONCESSION 4 TOWNSHIP OF ORO- MEDONTE The Application for Variance 201 O -A -30 was submitted to the Township of Oro- Medonte for relief from Section 5.36 b) of the Township's Zoning By -Law "Temporary Construction and Sales Uses ", which states that: "Nothing in this By -law shall prevent the use of land for a sales office and /or a model home for the sale of dwelling units provided the dwelling units to be sold are to be located on lands within the limits of the Township of Oro- Medonte." The subject application was heard on the September 16, 2010, Committee of Adjustment Meeting, which was granted approval subject to conditions as identified in Appendix 3. The original application consisted of a proposal to construct two model homes on lots within the Township for the sale of dwelling units located on lands within a draft plan approved Plan of Subdivision. Model homes were proposed to be constructed on Lots 37 and 56 (per Appendices 1 and 2), Part of Lots 3 and 4, Concession 4, which are zoned Residential One Zone with Exception 140 (131 *140), and Residential One Zone with Exception 140 and Holding Provision (R1 *140(H)), respectively. On October 27, 2010, Planning staff received a letter from the applicant, requesting a revision to the Committee of Adjustment's Notice of Decision, as found in Appendix 4. This letter requests "permission to construct [their] second model home on lot 10 and not lot 56', as provided in Appendices 5 and 6. Attached are the following appendices for the Committee of Adjustment's reference: • Appendix 1: Originally Proposed Location Map • Appendix 2: Original Application Drawing • Appendix 3: Notice of Decision dated October 21, 2010 2010 -A -30 November 18, 2010 Memorandum (Horseshoe Valley Lands Limfted) Page 17 of 274 5a) - 2010 -A -30 - Horseshoe Valley Lands L... • Appendix 4: Letter dated October 27, 2010 • Appendix 5: Revised Proposed Location Map • Appendix 6: Revised Application Drawing Res0ectfully submitted: 4 Alan Wlebe Planner 2010 -A -30 November 18, 2010 Memorandum 2 (Horseshoe Valley Lands Limited) Page 18 of 274 5a) - 2010 -A -30 - Horseshoe Valley Lands L... APPENDIX 1; ORIGINALLY PROPOSED LOCATION MAP 2010 -A -30 (Horseshoe Valley Lands Limited) 2010 -A -30 November 18, 2010 Memorandum 3 (Horseshoe Valley Lands Limited) Page 19 of 274 N (P t m Lot 37 !-r z w cn 3 UJI W Q z o 0 Y Q O E ll UJ `.J C7 z E� Lot 56 SUBJ iCT PROPERTIES 2010 -A -30 November 18, 2010 Memorandum 3 (Horseshoe Valley Lands Limited) Page 19 of 274 5a) - 2010 -A -30 - Horseshoe Valley Lands L... APPENDIX 2: ORIGINAL APPLICATION DRAWING 2010 -A -30 (Horseshoe Valley Lands Limited) 7. AIN gas aa.o� 47 _ 4 a.za 48 34.74 37 3 66x,04- o ' 46 z 49 $ g Y , 30.58 N E 30.89 30.84 }( a A =8.0 N884a 61.73 BLOCK 6; BLOCK - A-43 BLOCK 69 58 68 0 Nbs'3s's.�4E 0.14 g 30;00 30.00 30.00 30.14 N 36 d 65 6 54 g 45 �43.ao CA 30.00 «8838 38`E o N3996' 'E N$S J3`E u 30.00 30.00 30.00 .� ti+ <a £� in iri iii 35 W 8 6 8 p 51 00 44 p 30 00 N9838'"E Nse9s`39'E «s8 3935 f _ 2010 -A -34 November 18, 2010 Memorandum 4 (Horseshoe Valley Lands Limited) Page 20 of 274 30.00 30.00 30.00 v 30.00 ' z 30.00 21 --1 58 b) 0 a 57 34 N 63 30.00 > Q 52 g En 43 0 0 w ,SSB 'JS E a 00 .�'� #&'36"E #�.:. N8'3D�E.. '. A =8.07. x•4 29 ;K rT f 30. 30.00 30.00 m 30.fl0 m ; �° 0 62 n CRESCENT 53 8 42 30.00 N to 33 N w a NS836'35°E o -� NS$^8SS`E N Wt g 0 Q c 30.00 61 ` 00 ` 54 0 o 39 30.00 41 $ 4 la 2.9 471 30.00 �° 30.00 t ' 32 0 t 8Je3G°E r�rt z o N9838'J5'E N�'S6WE 30.E 30;00 30.00 so 30 00 ri 4 e* r-1 30.00 x 60 M p 55 Q 40 0 4 O0 {] M _ N8836'35"E NS836�$`E «88'deWE 30.00 P L 30.00 �5 3 00 � M po 31 PD N r m 30.00 NSg� 'E ° Nit s"E 0 2010 -A -34 November 18, 2010 Memorandum 4 (Horseshoe Valley Lands Limited) Page 20 of 274 30.00 30.00 v N 30 58 b) 0 a 57 38 30.00 csr cn 06232WW 0 0 30.40 23..00 25.00 a 00 A =8.07. 29 38 " TANGLEWOOD m 30.fl0 m ; �° m CRESCENT 30.00 ' N8838 �$ 25.00 17.11 i i e N 39 4 la 2.9 471 �° 30.00 30.00 56 c ` 37 36 ° n 4.00 27 30.E c + so P ri 4 e* 23:00 12 -67 � 2010 -A -34 November 18, 2010 Memorandum 4 (Horseshoe Valley Lands Limited) Page 20 of 274 5a) - 201 -A -30 - Horseshoe Valley Lands L APPENDIX 3: NOTICE OF DECISION DATED SEPTEMBER 16, 201 2010-A-30 (Horseshoe Valley Lands Limited) COMb4ITTER OF ADJUSTMENT - NOTICE OF DEMION Application No. 2010,A- 30, 11orseshoe Valley LvKW Limited. Pad of Lot s. and 4. Concession 4. RP 5 IR-30671, lAft 37 & 56 IN THE MATTER OF the Mannino Act, ILSA 1990, c-P 13, as amended, Section 45 (AMO) and (101: IN " wit MA TTER Ij h respcet to 2010�A-3% JJ Lots 37 & 56 WHEREAS the applicant is Proposing to construct two model homes on lots within the Township of Oro-MedoaW for the sale of dwelling units located on lands within the Township. Model homes: = proposed to be constructed on Lots 37 and 56, PartofLots 3 and 4, Concession4. The applicant is requesting the following - relief fiorn ZmlngBy- law 97-95: MgAmurn Permitted proposed Section 5-36 h)- Temporary Construction and Saks I model home Imodelhoom WMREAS the subject property Is designated "Horseshoe Valley - 1,ow Density Residardiarl in the Township Official Plan and zoned "Residential One Zone Exception 140 (RI*M Zone and Residential One Exception 140 Holding (RI*140(h)) Zone', respecti-Jyby By-law 97-95. WHEREAS having had regard to those matters addressed by The Planning Ad,. in accordance with the rules and Proomiums Prescribed under Ontario Regulation 20(1I96i as amended, and having considered all relevant information as presented at thepublk hearing on the 16" day ofSeptember 2010. The fulloaving is the Decision of the Committee: It is recommended that the CAnunifte, of Adjustment approve Variance Application 2010-A-30, to provide few from Zoning By4aw 97-95, with respect to the construction of two model homes on the subject lot& Subject to the following conditions: I. That the applicant apply for, and obtain, the r=oyal of the Holding (H) Ptovision which currently applies to ft lands in Which, W 56 is located prior to the use of this lot for the construction of a model home; 2. That the seMacb for the model homes be in conformity with the Residential One 7m with Exception 140 (RI*140), in Z*Hh1g BY-JAW 97-95, as amended; 3. That all other forms of development associated with the model homes fie in conformity with the applicable Zoning By -Ian 97-95. as amended; 4. That the applicant obtain any permits aftWor approvals, if required, from Nottawasaga Valley Canservation Authority, if applicable; and 5. That the apprWriale zoift certificatc(6) and building pernah(s) be obtained from iftTownsirlp only after the Commiftes decision becomes final and bW&u& as provided for Vent the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, cp, 13. 6. That the second model borne be built on Lot 56, as per schedule 2 of Report for Variance Application 2010-A-3a Dated this W day of September 2010 ied," Steven Treasurer Memberscoacurangin 1� 102 sdectsi 1 Lynda A*&ca . tt.�. tz r Michelle Lynch R Hastings - any pn.� TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to Section 4502) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. IM, C.P. 13, as amen" the above decision ancyor conditions may be appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board. Only individuals, emporations and public bodies may appeal decisions in respect of applications for consent to the Ontario Municipal Boatel- Aaouce of appeal may not be filed by an unutcorporated.association or group. However, a notice of appeal may be filed In the name of an individual who is a member of the association or group. THE LAST DATE FOR FILING A NOTICE OF AF AL IS THURSDAY, THE & DAY OF OCTOBER 2010, A"NOTICE OFAPPEALr setting out ht writing the supporting reasons for the appeal should be received on or before the lost date for'Appor accompanied by a complete the OAS Appellant form (AI) Planning Act and a certified cheque or money order in the amount of ONE HUNDRED AND TWENTY F]VE DOU-ARS payable to the MURSTRY OF MANCE. The notice is to be submitted ex. Secretary -Treastmer of the Committee Of Adiustmen4 148 Line 7 South, PO Box IoD Orn ON LDL 2XO. 201 -A -30 November 18, 2010 Memorandum 5 (Horseshoe Valley Lands Limited) I Page 21 of 274 5a) - 2010 -A -30 - Horseshoe Valley Lands L... APPENDIX 4: LETTER DATED OCTOBER 27, 2010 2010 -A -30 (Horseshoe Valley Lands Limited) Lands 7054 1 V�LLEY \-/ LANDS rr -ry -X da6-� - Fax 7054870133 October 27 2010 Mr Steven Farquharson Secretary Treasurer,, Committee ofAd�ustment Township of Oro- Medonte 148 Line 7 South P.O. Box 100 Oro Ontario, L01. DO Re: Apprrcation No 2010- ,q- 3oHorsesh a Valley Lands Limited-2 Model Homes beat Steven As per our recent tteiephor a conversation, I wish to have the Committee ofAdjustment consider amending the recently granted appro i i for Horseshoe Valley Lands to build 2 model homes. Condition number 6 permitted us to bulld our second model home on bt56, at the top end of OakmountAvenue. in retrospect we should have elected to keep the two model homes in Proximity one to the other, to awid the increase flow of traffic b Oughout the Landscape Community. To that end, we would like the Township's permission to construct our second model home on lot 10 wW not;lot $6, as was receMty approy . i intend to meet with the representatives of the Landscapes community who were present at the last Committee of Adjustment meeting to keep them fully informed of the proposed charge, if they feel co nforUble un'th the change and will not be attendingthe next meeting I Will see ifthey will sign a lettr indicating their agreement to the requested change, Vows ' ly � I ' l John tirnriile ti Presber CC Andr"ra Leigh IXk�705 835 9300 f 705 835 6743 t107 FJ'nrsrshoe Vali gfioadi Comp *A13atr ()Aft& L4\1418 t f� :geJN.:IfC!•iM /f��tt /rfb,f'(AlK 2010 -A -30 November 18, 2010 Memorandum 6 (Horseshoe Valley lands Limited) Page 22 of 274 5a) - 2010 -A -30 - Horseshoe Valley Lands L... APPENDIX 5: REVISED PROPOSED LOCATION MAP 2010 -A -30 (Horseshoe Valley Lands Limited) 2010 -A -30 November 18, 2010 Memorandum 7 (Horseshoe Valley Lands Limited) Page 23 of 274 �C7 (n 0t.1 Z w Lot.14 z w Q U z q 0 O 1> Y C? W � z 11 SUBd CT PROPERTIES 2010 -A -30 November 18, 2010 Memorandum 7 (Horseshoe Valley Lands Limited) Page 23 of 274 5a) - 2010 -A -30 - Horseshoe Valley Lands L... APPENDIX 6: REVISED APPLICATION DRAWING 2010 -A-30 (Horseshoe Valley Lands Limited) 2010 -A -30 November 18; 2010 Memorandum 8 (Horseshoe Valley Lands Limited) Page 24 of 274 5a) - 2010 -A -30 - Horseshoe Valley Lands L... 1N 3OS3ab QOOM319NVl N 0 CIL 0 —�j 1..� 3nN3AV 1NO WNVO •N Ii `P.NDSCPP o O � i n V lJ W O N308380 4bOM3 IONVl `NMOW Q i O ° � 1 s M 3nN3AV1NOVVVO Q •— 7 1 =j I J N H 1 LFNO i a V O N Page 25 of 274 5a) - 2010 -A -30 - Horseshoe Valley Lands L... Ln h s fi s � �*,� � �S Y W 4k � �• of f � _ � K _ 7 f a !! t f T • • ti EL 1 4 f 1 Page 26 of 274 5b) - 2010 -A -31 -Georgian Equipment (Cath... H E w TOWNSHIP OF ORO- MEDONTE' REPORT Application No: To: Committee of Adjustment Prepared By 2010 -A -31 Steven Farquharson, B.URPL Intermediate Planner Meeting Date: Subject: Variance Application Motion # November 18, 2010 (Catherine and George Thompson) 21 Paterson Road Plan 1719, RP 51 R -9538 Part 1 Roil # R.M.S. File #: 4346- 030 - 012 -26161 (Orillia) D10 40862 REQUIRED CONDITIONS: The following conditions are required to be imposed on the Committee's decision: 1, That an Ontario Land Surveyor provide verification to the Township of compliance with the Committee's decision by 1) pinning the footing and 2) verifying in writing prior to pouring of the foundation by way of survey /real property report so that: a) That the single storey industrial building be located no closer than approximately 5,0 metres from the west exterior lot line 2. That the setbacks be in conformity with the dimensions as set out on the application and sketches submitted and approved by the Committee; 3. That the applicant obtain any permits and /or approvals, if required, from Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority, if applicable 4. That the appropriate zoning certificate and building permit be obtained from the Township only after the Committee's decision becomes final and binding, as provided for within the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P. 13. BACKGROUND: The purpose of this report is to consider a Variance Application 2010 -A -31, for relief from the Township's Comprehensive zoning By -law in relation to the minimum required exterior side yard setback for a structure within the Economic Development (ED) Zone. The subject property has a lot frontage of approximately 33 metres on Patterson Road, a depth of 118 metres, and a lot area of 0.4 hectares, The subject property is currently vacant. The applicant is proposing to construct a single storey industrial building occupying an area of 553 square metres, to be located in the north -east corner of the lot. Development Services Meeting Date November 18, 2010 Application No. 2010 -A -31 Page 1 of 5 Page 27 of 274 5b) - 2010 -A -31 - Georgian Equipment (Cath... The applicant is proposing to construct a single detached 'industrial building, with a total floor area of 557 square metres (6000 square feet) The property is zoned Economic Development Exception 119 (ED *119) Zone. The applicant is requesting the following relief from Table B3 of Zoning By -law 97 -95: Table B3- Minimum Exterior Side Yard Setback: ES /LEGISLATION Does the vi Required Proposed 11.0 metres 5.0 metres to the general intent of the Official Plan? The property is designated Industrial in the Official Plan. Section C8 of the Plan states that the primary permitted use of lands within this designation shall be manufacturing, assembly, processing fabrication, storage and /or warehousing uses and research establishments. Therefore, the construction of a single storey industrial building would constitute a permitted use in the Industrial designation; On this basis the proposal is considered to conform with the intent of the Official Plan. Does the variance comply with the general intent of the Zoning By -lawn The subject lot is zoned Economic Development Exception 119 (ED *119) Zone. The purpose for regulating the interior side yard setback for building in the ED Zone, is to ensure that such buildings do not have an adverse effect on the surrounding properties. The neighbouring building located approximately 7 metres from the interior lot line, with a driveway separating the building from the interior lot line. A site inspection revealed that the proposed single storey industrial building would not adversely impact access to the rear of the property, as the property is a corner lot there is 12 metres from the east interior lot line. In addition, the proposed building will otherwise meets with all other Zoning By -law provisions (such as maximum height, front and rear yard setbacks) for structures within the ED Zone. The zoning exception that is placed on the property specifies that the rear yard setback to be 7.5 metres, which is to act as the minimum setback for buildings, structures and septic system from the rear lot line serving as the Environmental Protection (EP) Zone boundary. The applicant is proposing the structure to be located approximately 70 metres from the rear lot line. The subject property is regulated by the Lake Simcoe Conservation Authority, which will require the applicant obtain any necessary permits /approvals for the LSRCA. On the basis of the above, the proposal is considered to comply with the general intent of the Zoning By -law. Development Services Meeting Date November 18, 2010 Application No. 2010 -A -31 Page 2 of 5 Page 28 of 274 5b) - 2010 -A -31 - Georgian Equipment (Cath... Is the variance appropriate for the desirable development of the lot? A site 'inspection revealed that the proposed single storey industrial building will be located approximately 20 metres from the neighbouring building to the east The site inspection also revealed that the subject lands are located in an area of the Township, where surrounding lands consist of mainly large industrial building, which are within the required 6.0 metre interior side yard setback. The proposed location is clear of significant tree vegetation, which will allow for the applicant to have minimal tree removal. Based on the site inspection, the proposed building would appear to be appropriate for the desirable development of the lot. The purpose for the applicant requesting a 5 metre setback from the exterior side yard setback is to ensure that there is sufficient land for parking, and vehicle movement for large trucks that move product produced on and off site. The proposed building is not located within the travelled portion of the road and is not located with the required sight lines for a corner lot. On this basis, the proposal is considered desirable for the appropriate development of the subject lot Is the variance minor? As this application is deemed to be in conformity with the Official Plan, maintain the intent of the Zoning By -Law, and constitutes appropriate development, the variance is considered to be minor in nature. CONSULTATIONS: Transportation and Environmental Services- Building 'Department - Engineering Department Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority- Schedule 1 Location Schedule 2: Site Plan In the opinion of the Planning Department, Variance application 2010 -A -31 to construct a single storey industrial building within the required exterior side yard setback from the required 11 metres to 5.0 metres, appears to meet the four tests of the Planning Act. Respectfully submitted Steven arquhar o�BUR�Pl_ Intermediate Planner Reviewed by Glenn White, MCIP, RP Manager, Planning Services Development Services Meeting Date November 18, 2010 Application No. 2010 -A -31 Page 3 of 5 Page 29 of 274 5b) - 2010 -A -31 -Georgian Equipment (Cath... SCHEDULE 1: LOCATION MAP 2010 -A -31 (Thompson). i 4C o i z 4 1 Uj C3 3P,MIIESON -DRIVE- ----`-`� PATERSON — DRIVE' ti t Z Sutad Unds 21 Paterson Road 0 20 40 80 120 160 'Meters Development Services Meeting Date November 18, 201`0 Application No. 2010 -A -31 Page 4 of 5 Page 30 of 274 5b) - 2010 -A -31 - Georgian Equipment (Cath... SCHEDULE 2: CONTEXT MAP 2010 -A -31 (Thompson T W PATERSON DRIVE sm Road` Sulged Lands 21 Patwson Development Services Meeting Date November 18, 2010 Application No. 2010 -A -31 Page 5 of 5 Page 31 of 274 5b) - 2010 -A -31 -Georgian Equipment (Cath... Page 32 of 274 5b) - 2010 -A -31 - Georgian Equipment (Cath... Page 33 of 274 5b) - 2010 -A -31 - Georgian Equipment (Cath... Page 34 of 274 5b) - 2010 -A -31 - Georgian Equipment (Cath... Page 35 of 274 5b) - 2010 -A -31 - Georgian Equipment (Cath... Lake 5imcoe .� Region Conservation Intornotlonal Authority Riverfoundation Proud Winner of the 2009 International Thiess Riverjn Sent by email sfarquharson @oro- medonte.ca November 8, 2010 File No.: 2010 -A -31 IMS No.: PVOC732C4 Mr. Steven Farquharson Secretary- Treasurer, Committee of Adjustment Corporation of the Township of Oro - Medonte P.O. Box 100 Oro, ON LOL 2X0 Dear Mr. Farquharson: RE: Revised Minor Variance Application — Reduce Minimum Exterior Side Yard Setback Catherine Joanne & George Thompson, Owners Part of Lot 14, Concession 2 (Former Township of Orillia) 21 Patterson Drive, Plan Lot 13, Plan 1719 Town ship of Oro - Medonte, C ounty of Simcoe This letter is further to our previous letter of September 17, 2010, and the revised submission received on November 1, 2010. It Is our understanding that the purpose and effect of the revised application will allow for the construction of a new single detached industrial building on an existing lot of record. Based upon this review .the LSRCA has no objection to the above noted Minor Variance application, subiect to the following conditions 1. That a permit be obtained under Ontario Regulation 179/06 from the LSRCA, prior to the issuance of a municipal building permit for the construction of the proposed industrial building, and any proposed development or site grading within the above noted property. 2. That prior to any site alteration, proper erosion and sediment control measures must be in place. Page 1 of 2 120 Bayview Parkway Box 282, Newmarket, Ontario L3Y 4Xl - ---__ Tel: 905.895.1281 1.800.465.0437 Fax: 905.853.5881 J E -Mail: info@Isrca.on.ca Website: www.lstca.on.ca A Waters for fOr L Z fe Page 36 of 274 5b) - 2010 -A -31 - Georgian Equipment (Cath... Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority Mr. Steven Farquharson File No.: 2010 -A -31 IMS No: PVOC732C4 November 8, 2010 Page 2 of 2 Please be advised that in accordance with the LSRCA's Planning and Development Fees Policy (April 23, 2010, the total fee for this application is $200.00. By copy of this letter to the applicant, they should be advised that currently this fee is outstanding and to please forward the above mentioned fee to the LSRCA as soon as possible. If you have any questions, comments, or require anything further from the LSRCA, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at 905 - 895 -1281, extension 287, or by e-mail at i.walker @lsrca.on.ca. Please reference the above file numbers in future correspondence. I trust this meets your requirements at this time. Please advise us of your decision in this matter. Yours truly, �' VL Ian Walker, BSc. Environmental Planner IW /ph c. Catherine Joanne & George Thompson, Owners, cathv.hev @gmail.com S: \Env Plan \Plan Appls \Planning Letters \Minor Variances \Oro- Medonte \2010 \PVOC732. 2010- A- 31,21PattersonOrive.Thompson.IW - 2.docx Page 37 of 274 5b) - 2010 -A -31 - Georgian Equipment (Cath... 4—J -VU:NI Qd,jS3�oj 4� a E N CL o � o_ cr 0 W N N W 96'3Nl1 M o a fi 0 m � 4 0 N V a 0 N, Page 38 of 274 5b) - 2010 -A -31 - Georgian Equipment (Cath... OOWMN%k 4—J E c LU 0 w O `"Now ro< M o, r Q ro 9 O NMI N' J O t N Page 39 of 274 5b) - 2010 -A -31 -Georgian Equipment (Cath w E cr LU L 0 w m a 0 0 N Page 40 of 274 b� 4` i r, N33tt.1.36 �titClM1O ",r' �It "�h � ✓ -i JJ Page 40 of 274 5b) - 2010 -A -31 -Georgian Equipment (Cath... Page 41 of 274 *• AM L IMA , _A _. • X IL W m am Sim _ �. L N L lk Page 41 of 274 5b) - 2010 -A -31 - Georgian Equipment (Cath... Page 42 of 274 5b) - 2010 -A -31 - Georgian Equipment (Cath... i l Page 43 of 274 5b) - 2010 -A -31 - Georgian Equipment (Cath... • F_w . r !a. .t • • • • • • Page 44 of 274 5b) - 2010 -A -31 - Georgian Equipment (Cath... Page 45 of 274 5b) - 2010 -A -31 -Georgian Equipment (Cath... Page 46 of 274 -. I: C a ' e. oa Y � _ 5KC AM I L l g - 'd? w 5b} - 2010 -A -31 - Georgian Equipment (Cath... oowmft%% 4 i 1 f -AS r p W W 0 r\ O O 1 � Y ,J Page 48 of 274 5b) - 2010 -A -31 - Georgian Equipment (Cath... Page 49 of 274 5b) - 2010 -A -31 - Georgian Equipment (Cath... Page 50 of 274 5b) - 2010 -A -31 -Georgian Equipment (Cath... 4 A . .. .. Hill an FA • • • b i It Page 51 of 274 5b) - 2010 -A -31 -Georgian Equipment (Cath... Page 52 of 274 5b) - 2010 -A -31 -Georgian Equipment (Cath... Page 53 of 274 5b) - 2010 -A -31 - Georgian Equipment (Cath... OOOMO%% . — o0 N O LLJ OCL O V 0 a-i W � V � +-+ O m LL Ul Q Q O 0 �- 0 N Page 54 of 274 5c) - 2010 -13-32 - Angela McCuaig, Kevin Mc... TOWNSHIP OF ORO- MEDONTE REPORT Application No: To: Committee of Adjustment Prepared By: 2010 -B -32 Steven Farquharson, Intermediate Planner Meeting Date: Subject: Consent Application Motion # November 18, 2010 Angela McCraig, Kevin and Donald McLean 1051 Line 3 North Roll #: R.M.S. File #: 4346 -010- 002 - 08500 Part of Lot 14, Concession 4 D10- Former Township of Oro The following; conditions are required to be imposed on the Committee's decision: 1. That three copies of a Registered Reference Plan for the subject land indicating the severed parcel be prepared by an Ontario Land Surveyor be submitted to the Secretary- Treasurer; 2. That the severed lands be merged in title with the 1071 Line 3 North to the south -west (enhanced lands, per Schedule #2), and that the provisions of Subsection 3 or 5 of Section 50 of The Planning Act apply to any subsequent conveyance or transaction involving the subject lands; 3. That the applicant's zsolicitor prepare and submit a copy of the proposed conveyance for the parcel severed, for review by the Municipality; 4. That the applicants solicitor provide an undertaking that the severed lands and the lands to be enhanced will merge in title; 5. That the conditions of consent imposed by the Committee be fulfilled within one year from the date of the giving of the notice. BACKGROUND: The purpose of application 2010 -B -32 is to permit a lot addition/boundary adjustment. The subject land being 1051 Line 3 North, having a depth of approximately, 273 metres and an area of approximately 5.2 hectares. The subject lands are proposed to be added to the adjacent lands to the south being 1 071 Line 3 North. No new building lot is proposed to be created as a result of the lot addition. Development Services Meeting Date November 18, 2010 Application No. 2010 -6 -32 Page 1 of 5 Page 55 of 274 5c) - 2010 -13-32 - Angela McCuaig, Kevin Mc... The purpose of application 2010 -B -32 is to permit a lot addition /boundary adjustment. No new building lot is proposed to be created as a result of the lot addition. POLICIES /LEGISLATION: Township Official Plan The subject lands are designated "Agricultural - by the Township's Official Plan (OP) Section D2 of the OP contains policies with respect to subdivision of land. Specifically, Section D2.2.2- `Boundary Adjustment", provides the following guidance for Consent Applications in general: "A consent may be permitted for the purpose of modifying lot boundaries, provided no new building lot is created. In reviewing an application for such a boundary adjustment, the Committee of Adjustment shall be satisfied that the boundary adjustment will not affect the viability of the use of the properties affected as intended by this Plan. In addition, the Committee of Adjustment shall be satisfied that the boundary adjustment will not affect the viability of the agricultural parcels affected." With respect to the application at hand, no new building lots are proposed. The subject lands are currently vacant. The proposed land that is to be conveyed is to be added to 1071 Line 3 North. , As such, the proposed boundary _ adjustment is generally in keeping with the intent of the policies stated in the Official Plan, and otherwise conforms with the boundary adjustment policies contained on Section D2.2.2. County Official Plan The subject lands are designated Rural designation in the County of Simcoe's Official Plan. Section 3.3.4 of the County's Official Plan, "General Subdivision and Development Policies ", states that "Consents for the purpose of boundary adjustments and consolidation of land holdings are permitted but shall not be for the purpose of creating new lots except as otherwise permitted in this Plan. All lots created shall conform to all applicable municipal policies and bylaws. On this basis, the proposed consent appears to generally conform to the policies of the County of Simcoe's Official Plan. Development Services Meeting Date November 18, 20'10 Application No. 2010 -B -32 Page 2 of 5 Page 56 of 274 5c) - 2010 -13-32 - Angela McCuaig, Kevin Mc... Provincial Policy Statement The Provincial Policy Statement does not contain policies directly related to Lot adjustments (boundary adjustments) in the "Rural Areas" or "Nature Heritage" areas. The policies are related to the creation of a new lot or development, which are not proposed by this application. Zoninq By -Law The lands to be conveyed and the retained lands are both zoned Agricultural /Rural (A/RU) Zone by the Township's Zoning By -Law. The lands to be enhanced lands are zoned Rural Residential Two (RUR2) Zone. The proposed boundary adjustment would result in the enhanced lands occupying an area of approximately 5.9 hectares, and the retained lands would occupy an area of approximately 13.3 hectares. Both the enhanced and the retained lands would comply with the provisions of the Zoning By -Law related to the minimum required lot area and frontage for single detached dwellings hobby farm uses on lands in the A/RU and RUR2 Zone. On this basis, the application is considered to comply with the provisions of the Zoning By -Law. CONSULTATIONS: Transportation and Environmental Services - Building Department Engineering Department Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority— No Objections County of Simcoe- ATTACHMENTS: Schedule #1- Location Map Schedule #2- Context Map It is the opinion of the Planning Department that Consent application 2010 -B -32, for a boundary adjustment, would appear to conform to the general intent of the Official Plans of the Township and the County of Simcoe, and would comply with the general intent of the Township's Zoning By -Law. Respectfully submitted: Steven F �rqu rson, B.URPL Intermedia a Planner Development Services Application No. 2010 -B-32 Reviewed' by; Glenn White, MCIP RPP Manager, Planning Services Meeting Date November 18, 2010 Page 3 of 5 Page 57 of 274 5c) - 2010 -13-32 - Angela McCuaig, Kevin Mc... SCHEDULE 1: LOCATION MAP (2010 -13-32 McCuaig and McLean) 11� Cz J DRURY M ILL ROAD - -----L - 19-16•8IDEROAD P1511 6 SiDEROAD SLbjetf Lands .,Enhanced Lands being 1 7t Line3 Nedh Development Services Meeting Date November 18, 2010 Application No. 20114 -B -32 Page 4 of 5 Page 58 of 274 5c) - 2010 -B -32 - Angela McCuaig, Kevin Mc... SCHEDULE 2: CONTEXT MAP (2010 -B =32 McCuaig and McLean) #3oposedLands to be Conveyed E Hoposed Retained Lands Enhanced Lands being 1071 Lkie 3N Development Services Meeting Date November 18, 2010 Application No. 2010 -13-32 Page 5 of ,5 Page 59 of 274 5) -201 O-B-32 -Angela Mc u # Kevin Mc Page 6 G 274 W )\� § / ° ` $ •f `| �m - -� \§ -_ H w :4 ;4r [� \ •§ ! ; -_ (\SEE> : ;))\ \/ k | & !!S k | q I a RosS;JRO o || s || | a | � | ! ce Q ! v �- . . | 0 ` ƒ � . 0 ) 0 � ` � 6 ■ 6 . | � � § . � ® © . a _ _ =,j. :, •. . / - ` ~� ' �a,Z / /%2 2 N »` � ZA . > .. Page 6 G 274 5c) - 2010 -B -32 - Angela McCuaig, Kevin Mc... Page 61 of 274 5c) - 2010 -13-32 - Angela McCuaig, Kevin Mc... November 3, 2010 Member Municipalities Adjala- Tosorontio Amaranth Barrie The Blue Mountains Bradford -West Gwillimbury Clearview Collingwood Essa Grey Highlands Innisfil Melancthon Mono Mulmur New Tecumseth Oro - Medonte Shelburne Springwater Wasaga Beach Watershed Counties Dufferin Grey Simcoe Member of Conservation ONTARIO Steven Farquharson, Secretary- Treasurer Committee of Adjustment Township of Oro - Medonte P.O. Box 100 Oro, Ontario LOL 2X0 Dear Mr. Farquharson; Re: Application for Consent 2010 -B -32 1071 Line 3 North, Pt. Lot 14, Concession 4 Township of Oro- Medonte (Formerly Township of Oro) The Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority (NVCA) has reviewed this application for consent to facilitate a boundary adjustment and based upon our policies established under the Conservation Authorities Act we have no objection to its approval. Thank you for circulating this application for our review and please forward a copy of any decision. Sincerely, a� Tim Salkeld Resource Planner Celebrating 50 Years in Conservation 1960 -2010 NOTTAWASAGA VALLEY CONSERVATION AUTHORITY Centre for Conservation John Hix Conservation Administration Centre Tiffin Conservation Area 8195 8th Line Utopia, On LOM 1 TO Telephone: 705.424.1479 Fax: 705.424.2115 Web: www.nvca.on.ca Email: admin@nvca.on.ca Page 62 of 274 5c) - 2010 -B -32 - Angela McCuaig, Kevin Mc... Page 63 of 274 5c) - 2010 -B -32 - Angela McCuaig, Kevin Mc... Page 64 of 274 r V 0 N m .:,.:. m 0 0 N £'3NI1 Page 64 of 274 5c) - 2010 -B -32 - Angela McCuaig, Kevin Mc... U c V G n ru W J V 2 \0 N m m I O O N L 4 519 C 5`::7!533:.X13 !� »i.tbC �711`ltt.� : 17 F S f . c a 7 F s i >, I C'70r ma y: .3� $ V: r� Y Page 65 of 274 L e 5 4 . CL tit' •,}c. r' �L; 0 � � � ... w. _• rM ,,,tee • k • t f L 4 519 C 5`::7!533:.X13 !� »i.tbC �711`ltt.� : 17 F S f . c a 7 F s i >, I C'70r ma y: .3� $ V: r� Y Page 65 of 274 5c) - 2010 -B -32 - Angela McCuaig, Kevin Mc... bz U V ,. G i ru O �0 c%*4 ..� m m rmi o N r' r Page 66 of 274 5c) - 2010 -B -32 - Angela McCuaig, Kevin Mc... Page 67 of 274 5c) - 2010 -B -32 - Angela McCuaig, Kevin Mc... Page 68 of 274 5c) - 2010 -B -32 - Angela McCuaig, Kevin Mc... *'. y �N 1 • ..Vt _ _ _ `aIT1 M1` { 1I i 3 • C r w P , 1 k � y M L ✓rYY� I . _ � f _i. Page 69 of 274 . C� J H t- C� J "ten y �` -- r z t- "ten y �` -- r z • ys Y I • 1 ! s �J l y C - �• f z - LP' L -r rz L ! l r w E to L-J 1 0 6 � r _ I L 1 ' �(L V ICY__ .. • .rte v,- .st!�;sl - - ,I, �•! �! * �- � ' r' ,� of [ j 111. _, � li I ! I. ,I, 0 4 Os 5c) - 2010 -B -32 - Angela McCuaig, Kevin Mc... Page 75 of 274 5d) - 2010 -B -33 - Fraser Hardy McConney 17... TOWNSHIP OF ORO- MEDONTE REPORT Application No: To: Committee of Adjustment Prepared By: 2010 -B -33 Alan Wiebe, Planner Meeting Date: Subject: Consent Application Motion November 18 2010 Fraser Hardy McConney 17015116 Sideroad east Concession 8, Lot 16 Roll #: R.M.S. File #: 4346 -010- 003 -38800 (Former Township of Medonte) D10.41025 The purpose of Consent application 2010 -B -33 is for a technical severance to create a lot which once existed as a separate parcel of land. The lands proposed to be severed would have approximately 249.9 metres (820 feet) of frontage along 15/16 Sideroad East, a lot depth of approximately 211 metres (692.25 feet) along the interior side lot line to the east, and a lot area of approximately 5.26 hectares (13 acres). The proposed lands to be severed currently contain a detached accessory building. The lands proposed to be retained would have approximately 268.2 metres (880 feet) of frontage along 15/16 Sideroad East, a lot area of approximately 31.97 hectares (79 acres), and it is currently vacant,: The applicant has submitted a title search letter dated October 28, 2010, which provides a chronology for the ownership and merging of the subject property, to its current configuration. Clarification on the chronology of this title search, however, is required for the proper understanding of the sequence of merging of parcels leading to the present day configuration of the subject property. ANALYSIS: The purpose of Consent Application 2010 -6 -33 is for a technical severance to create a lot which once existed as a separate parcel of land. The Township's Official Plan contains policies (Section D2.2.3) which permit Planning Staff and the Committee to consider technical severances. Not applicable. Development Services Meeting Date November 18, 2010 Application No. 2010 -B-33 Page 1 of '5 Page 76 of 274 5d) - 2010 -B -33 - Fraser Hardy McConney 17... Township of Ora - Medonte Official Plan The subject lands are designated Agricultural, Environmental Protection One, and Environmental Protection Two Overlay in the Township's Official Plan. Township of Oro- Medonte Comprehensive Zoning By -law 97 -95 The subject property is currently zoned Agricultural /Rural (A/RU) and Environmental Protection (EP) Zone in the Township's Zoning By -law 97 -95, as amended. The lands proposed to be retained contain the area zoned Environmental Protection (EP) Zone, and Section 5.28 of the Zoning By -Law requires a minimum 30 metres setback for all buildings and structures from the boundary of the Environmental Protection (EP) Zone. Building Department- no concerns Engineering Department — Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority No objection ATTACHMENTS: Schedule 1 — Location Map Schedule 2 — Context Map Schedule 3 — Application Drawing CONCLUSIONS In the opinion of the Planning Department, Consent Application 2010 -B -33, being to create a lot which once existed as a separately conveyable parcel of land, be deferred for Planning staff to obtain clarification from the applicant and their agent on the sequence of events in the merging of properties leading to the present day configuration of the subject property. Respectfully submitted: Reviewed by: Alan Wiebe Glenn White, MCIP, RPP Planner Manager, Planning Services Development Services Meeting Date November 18, 2010 Application No. 2010 -B -33 Page 2 of 5 Page 77 of 274 5d) - 2010 -B -33 - Fraser Hardy McConney 17... SCHEDULE 1: LOCATION MAP 2010 -8 -33 (McConney) OB IE ROAD AV - - T 15/16 SIDERDAD r- w_ z J LG SUBJECT PROPERTY Development Services Meeting Date November 18, 2010 Application No. 2010 -13-33 Page 3 of 5 Page 78 of 274 5d) - 2010 -B -33 - Fraser Hardy McConney 17... SCHEDULE 2: CONTEXT MAP 2010 -B -33 (McConney) AI n� w Z . co w Z� r s►DE�? 1.511: Proposed Severed Lands Proposed Retained Lands Development Services Meeting bate November 18, 2010 Application No. 2010 -B -33 Page 4 of 5 Page 79 of 274 5d) - 2010 -B -33 - Fraser Hardy McConney 17... SCHEDULE 3: APPLICATION DRAWING 2010 -13-33 (McConney) Development Services Meeting Date November 18, 2010 Application No. 2010 -B -33 Page 5 of 5 Page 80 of 274 3 « x fi K.: f .j P w r I Development Services Meeting Date November 18, 2010 Application No. 2010 -B -33 Page 5 of 5 Page 80 of 274 3 « x K.: f P w r I 6 l I PA/PT 3 :zc .vs�aa. ITT . P4ffr i C `+ ki it .. nA f H Development Services Meeting Date November 18, 2010 Application No. 2010 -B -33 Page 5 of 5 Page 80 of 274 5d) - 2010 -B -33 - Fraser Hardy McConney 17... SHIRLEY PARTRIDGE REGISTRY SERVICES INC. 168 LAKESHORE ROAD WEST R.R. # 1, ORO STATION, ON COL 2EO October 28 2010 The Corporation of The Township of Oro- Medonte 148 Line 7 S, Box 100 Oro ON LOL 2X0 Attention: Committee of Adjustment Dear Members: Re: Fraser Hardy McConney Application for Technical Severance Part of East Half Lots 16, Concession '8 Township of Oro- Medonte Part of PIN 58540- 0015(LT) Fraser Hardy McConney is the registered owner of the Part of the East Half of Lot 16 Concession 8, Part of Lot 15 Concession 8, and Part of the original Road Allowance between Lots 15 and 16 Concession 8 in the former Township of Oro. The Crown Patent for the East Half of Lot 16, Concession 8 was granted to Thomas David McConkey on October 24 tt ', 1872. He conveyed the said East Half to Dougald McCuaig and Finlay McCuaig later that year. The McCuaig's conveyed the west part of the East Half (50 acres) to James Morrison on June 19 1875. Mr. Morrison transferred a small parcel to the Trustees of School Section No. 8 in 1880. Mr. Morrison disappears from title in 1882 and Robert Paisley appears on title in 1887 by virtue of a Mortgage in 1887 to The London and Canadian Loan & Agency Company Limited. There is an actual break in the chain of title at this point as there is no evident connection between Morrison and Paisley. In 1915, Robert Paisley conveyed an additional portion to School Section 'No. 8. The balance of the lands appear to stay in the Paisley name until Robert Hilton Paisley (son of Robert Paisley) conveys the entire parcel comprised of Part of Lots 15 and 16, Concession 8 to Joseph and Jean Briggs in 1951. In 1957 when Mr. and Mrs. Briggs transfer the lands to 'Francis Neil Briggs, Mr. Paisley deposited a Declaration on title setting out the details of the unique nature of his family's tenure on these lands. In the final paragraph of that Declaration he declares "until recently (1956) 1 was unaware that my date father did not have registered title to all of the lands ... I am now of the firm belief that my late father failed either by ignorance or inadvertence to register his deed to these lands. Page 81 of 274 5d) - 2010 -B -33 - Fraser Hardy McConney 17... The same Mortgage by Robert Paisley in 1887 was also registered on part of Lot 15, Concession 8. Lot 15 was patented separately in 1841 to the Canada Company, and subsequently conveyed to Gilbert Bell. Mr. Bell split part of the west part and part of the east part off in 1854. The center portion (which part Mr. McConney currently owns) was conveyed by Bell to Henry Shaw in 1874 who then quit claimed it back in 3 months. Gilbert Bell then transferred 26 acres of the center portion to Archibald Currie in 1875, and 53 acres to his son, Gilbert Jr. in 1876. That 53 acre parcel was subsequently conveyed to James Morrison in 1877 and follows the same fate as Morrison's interest in the east part of Lot 16, Concession 8; ending up in the name of Robert Paisley. The portion owned by Currie (26 acres) was conveyed to a son of Robert Paisley (David) in 1904 and followed through the Paisley family by various registrations culminating with the deed to Robert Hilton Paisley who then registered his Declaration in 1957 explaining the sequence of his family's ownership of these lands. The portions of Lot 15 and 16, Concession 8 currently owned by Fraser Hardy McConney effectively merged in 1947 when Robert Hilton Paisley acquired part of Lot 15 from his brother John as he had already been in possession of and had paid the taxes on the entire parcel since 1914. As referenced earlier, the entire parcel was conveyed to Joseph and Jean Briggs in 1951, and then by them to Francis Neil Briggs in 1957. 1n 1993, Lloyd and Maria Squire acquire the said parcel which is then enhanced by the addition of part of the original Road Allowance between the East Half of Lots 15 and 16, Concession 8 in 2000. This portion of the road was closed by the Township in 1983. Douglas McDougall purchased all of the lands owned by the Squire's on the north side of the 15/16 Sideroad in June, 2000. He then conveyed the parcel to Fraser Hardy McConney on June 11 2003. The spouse of Mr. McConney, Michele Caroline Ethier purchased the original "school" lands in 1985, and conveyed them to herself and her husband in 1989. To avoid the merger of title with the acquisition of the much larger portion surrounding this parcel, the "school lands were transferred into the name of Michele Caroline McConney alone in 2003. Mr. McConney wishes to re- establish the boundary between part of the East Half of Lot 16 and part of Lot 15 as established by the Crown Patents. The portion of the Road Allowance between Lots 15 and 16 described as Part 3, Plan 51 8- 2381`0 shall be added to that portion of the East Half of Lot 16, Concession 8 as it lies imme,iiately to the north of that portion of the lands. There has been no change,.i the boundaries of the parcel since these acquisitions. r` Yours tr y, Shirley Partridge, v' President Shirley Partridge egstry Services Inc. Page 82 of 274 5d) - 2010 -B -33 - Fraser Hardy McConney 17... Lake Simcoe' Region Conservation 1a Ia(n at on a; /authority R�erEoanaatian Sent by email sfarquharson[ta Proud Winner oro- medonte.ca of the 2009 International November 8, 2010 Thiess Riverprize File No.: 2010-B-33 IMS No.: PLDC1037C2 Mr. Steven Farquharson Secretary- Treasurer, Committee of Adjustment Corporation of the Township of Oro - Medonte P.O. Box 100 Oro, ON LOL 2X0 Dear Mr. Farquharson: RE: Land Division Consent Application — Technical Severance for Creation of a New Lot Fraser Hardy McConney, Owner Part of Lot 15 & 16, Concession 8 (Former Township of Oro) 17015/16 Sideroad East Township of Oro - M edonte, County of Simcoe Thank you for conferring with the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority (LSRCA) with regard to the above noted Land Division Consent application. It is our understanding that the purpose and effect of this application will allow for the creation of a new lot by re- establishing a separate parcel merged on title with an existing lot of record. We have reviewed this application for consistency with the Public Health and Safety Policies (Natural Hazards) of the Provincial Policy Statement (PPS), conformity with the Lake Simcoe Protection Plan (LSPP), and in accordance with Ontario Regulation 179/06 made under the Conservation Authorities Act. As you are aware, the subject property is located within the jurisdiction of the LSRCA, and is partially located within an area regulated under this Authority's Development, Interference with Wetlands and Alterations to Shorelines and Watercourses Regulation (Ontario Regulation 179/06) made under the Conservation Authorities Act. The northern portion of the retained property is regulated for a watercourse (Hawkestone Creek) with associated floodplain, meanderbelt (erosion allowance), and Provincially Significant Wetland (Hawkestone Wetland Complex). A permit will be required for any future development within the regulated portions of the above noted property, prior to issuance of a municipal building permit. Based on the above noted information and our review of the proposed Consent application, we provide the following comments for your consideration: 1. Since this proposed severed lot is entirely outside of any natural heritage or hydrologic features (as defined by policies 6.21 -DP & 6.22 -DP of the Lake Simcoe Protection Plan) and their associated minimum vegetation protection zones, the Lake Simcoe Protection Plan would not prevent this application. 1 F Tel: 905,895.128 1 1.800,465.0.437 Fax: 905.853.5881 E -Mail: iatotaEsrca_oct,c+ %Yfebsite: www.=srca_on.ca Page 83 of 274 5d) - 2010 -B -33 - Fraser Hardy McConney 17... Lake 5imcoe i Region f Conservation Authority November 8, 2010 File No.: 2010 -B -33 IMS No.: PLDC1037C2 Mr. Steven Farquharson Page 2 of 2 2. Based on our mapping, all regulated features are contained within the proposed retained property, and there is sufficient area outside of the regulated area to support the permitted existing uses based on the current zoning for this property (i.e. such as a single family dwelling). Based upon this review the LSRCA has no objection to the above noted Land Division Consent application. Please advise the applicant that in accordance with the LSRCA's Planning and Development Fees Policy (April 23, 2010), the total fee for this application is $300.00. The applicant should be advised that currently this fee is outstanding and to please forward the above mentioned fee to the LSRCA as soon as possible. If you have any questions, comments, or require anything further from the LSRCA, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at 905 -895 -1281, extension 287, or by e -mail at i.walker @lsrca.on.ca. Please reference the above file numbers in future correspondence. I trust this meets your requirements at this time. Please advise us of your decision in this matter. Yours truly, Ian Walker, BSc. Environmental Planner IW /ph C. Fraser Hardy McConney, Owner, 170 15/16 Sideroad East, Oro Station, ON, LOL 2E0 Charles Burgess, Senior Planning Coordinator, LSRCA Rachelle Hamelin, County ofSimcoe, rachelle.hamelin @ simcoe.ca 5: \Env Plan \Plan Appis \Planning Letters\ Consents\ Oro- Medonte \2010 \PLDC1037.2010 -B -33: 170- 15- 1GSideroadEast.McConney.IW -I docx Page 84 of 274 5d) - 2010 -B -33 - Fraser Hardy McConney 17... Page 85 of 274 i 0 8 3NI1 U � U M � M m L � O o a o � t 3NI1 � O w N W' a m m W a J 0 Page 85 of 274 5d) - 2010 -B -33 - Fraser Hardy McConney 17... Page 86 of 274 �— 9-All 0 W 0 0 U U 0 Mcc �a CY I JJ � M � N L C O 0 0 O Q. 0 0. Q N �a L 3NI1 Page 86 of 274 5d) - 2010 -B -33 - Fraser Hardy McConney 17... b p i � • �.i � V i Y P ra ♦ i f i i �' a• t W ��S a t t i Yn t:rr0 r jr S yN s wSr.t aS ; f t YYY s -. w, f e car a f.•NARri ••q •A ' 2.•��Ilpa :r a >si -��!— 't �•) U I t n (•�� r/ wt �• f 4 l K _ .. ... ... A. 4 it A'•" Y 4 Y. J L Y{ { el t. N , • Y•nM.M !•�. "4 .A.. R Page 87 of 274 5d) - 2010 -B -33 - Fraser Hardy McConney 17... Vf 47 V 8 StO S.3�iriL� f�33.1t3�e'',+}}� R' �'1 � � t2 �� �11 ti. g Ow �• Ot • y QQ `000 :'. StiA155.�CJi.JG Xf 3:S'.�a 3^hYrfA77V �� / s I %' ' y o CD CN r' { •:.s.i,r�• 2�tfi l7 i�r Jw.. •:1 `ice.,.. - 4 VZ 8 �JHb 5eC,5S�� N??AE.36t #YZ7f �"l9EZt,� J7o ;� •' 7 Page 88 of 274 5d) - 2010 -B -33 - Fraser Hardy McConney 17... Page 89 of 274 5d) - 2010 -B -33 - Fraser Hardy McConney 17... Page 90 of 274 F- - I u IN _ r IUM, �mills6 ta y el T o k -iJ' ./ *1 f , S t i• itl M ® ►_ �- .JI�IM r �Q�+i't n .�f �o..e�s'�CitP.'ii.. r _c, Y 5d) - 2010 -B -33 - Fraser Hardy McConney 17... Page 92 of 274 5d) - 2010 -B -33 - Fraser Hardy McConney 17... Page 93 of 274 5d) - 2010 -B -33 - Fraser Hardy McConney 17... Page 94 of 274 F L-J O i �c _� 9 '0 -r 7i J�r ..,:f 1 �A r/ � I p ' -� J _1 l f 4 Y • 1 1 -. P. a F L a 5d) - 2010 -B -33 - Fraser Hardy McConney 17... Page 97 of 274 4 a ' • 5e) - 2010 -A -38 - Donald Leroux North Side... TOWNSHIP OF ORO- MEDONTE' REPORT Pmxd Fln+/ggq E'xIXLid l-'uwm. Application No To: Committee of Adjustment Prepared By 2010 -A -38 Steven Farquharson, Intermediate Planner Meeting Date: Subject: Variance Application Motion # January 21, 2010 (Donald Leroux) Part of Lot 10, Concession 8, North Side of Mount St. Louis Road, East Roll #: R.M.S. File #: 4346 - 020409 -21605 of Highway 400 D13 -41026 Medonte REQUIRED CONDITIONS: BACKGROUND: The purpose of this report is to consider a Variance Application 2010 -A -38, for relief from the Township's Comprehensive Zoning By -law in relation to constructing an agricultural building on a lot that has an area of less than 2.0 hectares in the A/RU Zone. The applicants are requesting that an agricultural building be constructed proposing to have a floor area of 139 square metres. The proposed Variance application was circulated quoting Sections 5.1.2 and 5.1.6 of the Zoning By- law, which deals with timing of construction and maximum floor area of accessory buildings. However, the applicant requested relief from Table B4, of Zoning By -law, which for an Agricultural Building to be located, a lot that is less than 2.0 hectares. The subject property has a lot frontage of approximately 227 metres on Mount St. Louis Road East, a depth of approximately 71 metres, and a lot area of 0.9 hectares. The subject property is currently vacant. The property is located north of Mount St. Louis Road, East of Highway 400. The applicant has indicated that the agricultural building is needed to accommodate personal storage, trailers, parts tools, lift trailer and pumps: ANALYSIS: PURPOSE OF APPLICATION: The applicant is proposing to construct an Agricultural Building on a lands that have a lot area less than 2.0 hectares. The applicant is requesting the following relief from Zoning By -law 97 -95: Table B4 Minimum Lot Size for an Agricultural Uses Required Proposed 2.0 Hectares 0.9 Hectares FINANCIAL: Not applicable. Development Services Meeting Date November 18, 2010 Application No. 2010 -A-39 Page 1 of 3 Page 99 of 274 5e) - 2010 -A -38 - Donald Leroux North Side... POLICIES /LEGISLATION: Does the variance conform to the general intent of the Official Plan? The property is designated Rural in the Official Plan, Does the variance comply with the general intent of the Zoning By- law? The subject property is zoned Agricultural /Rural (AJRU) Zone. Is the variance appropriate for the desirable development of the lot? Is the variance minor? Building Department- Engineering Department _ ATTACHMENTS: e Schedule 1: Location Map Schedule 2: Site Plan It is the opinion of the Planning Department that Variance application 2010 -A -39 be deferred until proper notice to be given in accordance with the Planning Act. Respectfully submitted: Reviewed by: Steven arson; B.URPL Glenn White, MCIP, RPP Intermediate Planner Manager, Planning Services Development Services Meeting Date November 18, 2010 Application No. 2010-A-39 Page 2 of 3 Page 100 of 274 5e) - 2010 -A -38 - Donald Leroux North Side... SCHEDULE 1; LOCATION MAP 2010 -A -39 (Leroux) w' z tea Development Services Meeting Date November 18, 2010 Application. No. 2010 -A -39 Page 3 of 3 Page 101 of 274 5e) - 2010 -A -38 - Donald Leroux North Side... n ' I e It al s wdry r x _ h - f a1rd K .�Ow,» .r r IWY i -T` 00 w ° Z 0 , z o ry � it.. 0 r S 0 ',°`_3 11-- O � y �. Z <Z a N 3 °zOLU a O p J F Lt, V) e2� Z ° l (n z , .� i— o. rn Q CL O�m0U 1 4� 9 g W� . .. E bi bi , Page 102 of 274 5e) - 2010 -A -38 - Donald Leroux North Side... Page 103 of 274 5e) - 2010 -A -38 - Donald Leroux North Side... Page 104 of 274 5e) - 2010 -A -38 - Donald Leroux North Side... X O J ***..000 00 M Q 1 O O N t re As m � a to �� o lit 0 > 4 y s; o pt OF Page 105 of 274 5e) - 2010 -A -38 - Donald Leroux North Side... Page 106 of 274 5e) - 2010 -A -38 - Donald Leroux North Side... Page 107 of 274 5e) - 2010 -A -38 - Donald Leroux North Side... Page 108 of 274 5e) - 2010 -A -38 - Donald Leroux North Side... Page 109 of 274 5e) - 2010 -A -38 - Donald Leroux North Side... Page 110 of 274 517 - 2010 -A -39 - Meghan Church, Caitlin H... TOWNSHIP OF ORO- MEDONTE' i O =ffe to .t REPORT PNwd Havayy PShctigPnwl. Application No: To: Committee of Adjustment prepared By: REQUIRED CONDITIONS: The following conditions are required to be imposed on the Committee's decision: 1. That an Ontario Land Surveyor provide verification to the Township of compliance with the Committee's decision in writing that That the proposed boathouse maintain an interior side yard setback of 1.1 metres 2. That the applicants obtain approval from the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority under t, the Conservation Authorities Ac 3. Nothwithstanding Section 56 (a), that the proposed boathouse meets all other provisions of Section 5.6 of Zoning By -law 97 -95; 4. That the setbacks be in conformity with the dimensions as set out on the application and sketches submitted and approved by the Committee; 5. That the appropriate zoning certificate and building permit be obtained from the Township only after the Committee's decision becomes final and binding, as provided for within the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P. 13, BACKGROUND: The purpose of this report is to consider a Variance Application 2010 -A -39, for relief from the Township's Comprehensive Zoning By -law in relation' to the required interior side yard setback provision for boathouses. ANALYSIS: The applicants are proposing to construct an addition onto an existing boathouse. The proposed addition to the boathouse will have an area of approximately 3.8 metres. The applicants are requesting the following relief from Zoning By -law 97 -95 Development Services Meeting Date November 18, 2010 Application No. 2010 -A -39 Page 1 of 5 : 20'10 -A -39 Steven Farquharson, B.URI'L Intermediate Planner Meeting Date: Subject, Variance Application Motion # November 18, 2010 Meghan Church, Caitlin Hussey, Kathleen :Sutherland Roll #: Plan 780, Lot 26 R�M.S. File # 4346- 030 - 012 - 08600 53 Eight Page 111 of 274 : Mile Paint Read D13 -4y008 Page 111 of 274 5f) - 2010 -A -39 - Meghan Church, Caitlin H... 1. Section 5.6 a) Minimum interior side yard setback for a boathouse from the required 2 metres (6.5 feet) to a proposed 1.1 metres (3.6 feet). Does the variance conform to the general intent of the Official Plan? The property is designated Shoreline in the Official Plan. Section D10.1 which contains the Shoreline policies in the Township's Official Plan sets out the following objectives: • To maintain the existing character of this predominantly residential area. • To protect the natural features of the shoreline area and the immediate shoreline. The applicant is not requesting an increase in boathouse shoreline coverage or a variance for height just for the interior side yard setback at the rear of the boathouse. The requested interior side yard setback variance would appear to maintain the character of the shoreline area. On this basis, the proposed variance would therefore conform with the intent of the policies contained in the Official Plan. Does the variance comply with the general intent of the Zoning By-law? The subject property is zoned Shoreline Residential Exception 2 (SR *2) in Zoning By -law 97.95. The intent of the By-law is to establish setback requirements, which assist in preserving the natural shoreline and maintaining the residential character. The purpose of the By -law for regulating the location and height of boathouses is to prevent an over- developed shoreline which would ultimately impact the character of the shoreline. The proposed boathouse meets the height provisions of the By- law and the percentage of water frontage occupied by the structure. The applicant has indicated the purpose of requesting a 1.1 metre setback from the interior side yard setback is to have minimal impact on the existing shoreline and to accommodate a proposed larger boat. Due to the existing boathouse being constructed on an angle the rear portion of the proposed addition will be within the required interior side yard setback. Therefore, the proposed variance would appear to maintain the intent of the Zoning- By -law provisions On this basis the variance is deemed to conform to the general intent of the Zoning by -law. Is the variance appropriate for the desirable development of the tot? Based on the site inspection, the proposed' interior side yard setback for the boathouse would appear to be appropriate for the desirable development of the lot and in keeping with the surrounding shoreline area. It should be noted that the existing boathouse is a non- conforming structure along the interior side property line. The proposed addition proposes to reduce the existing setback of the boathouse by Development Services Meeting Date November 18, 2010 Application No. 2010 -A39 Page 2 of '6 Page 112 of 274 5f) - 2010 -A -39 - Meghan Church, Caitlin H... 0.34 metres. The area in which the applicant is proposing to build the addition to the existing boathouse is free and any significant tree coverage, which will allow for maximum tree preservation on the property. Given that the proposed boathouse will not result in the over - development of the subject lot or the shoreline, the proposal is considered appropriate for the desirable development of the subject lot. Is the variance minor? As this application should not adversely affect the character of the surrounding area, the proposed variance is considered to be minor. CONSULTATIONS: Transportation and Environmental Services- Building Department Engineering Department Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority- No Objection (Comments Attached) ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map 2. Site Plan In the opinion of the Planning Department, Variance application 2010 -A =39, being to grant reduced interior side yard setback from the required 2.0 metres to 1.1 metres for the construction of an addition onto an existing boathouse, appears to meet the four tests of the Planning Act. r Respectfully submitted: Reviewed by Steve R �Pl* Glenn White, �MCIP, RPP lnterme a Planner Manager, Planning Services Development Services Meeting Date November 18,2010 Application No. 2010 -A -39 Page 3 of 5 Page 113 of 274 5f) - 2010 -A -39 - Meghan Church, Caitlin H... SCHEDULE 1: LOCATION MAP 2010 -A -39 (Church, Hussey, Sutherland) Development Services Meeting; Date November 10, 2010 Application No. 201,0 -A 39 Page 4 of 5 Page 114 of 274 5f) - 2010 -A -39 - Meghan Church, Caitlin H... SCHEDULE 2: SITE PLAN 201 Q -A -39 Church, Husse , Sutherland vM`y w�r�rs r ro �y ?O L a t _y MNuKe _....� � S r AIJ 30.6 meters Eight Mile Point Rd public read Development Services Meeting Date November 18, 201'0 Application No. 2010 -A -39 Page 5 of 5 Page 115 of 274 5f)-2010-A-39- Meghan Church, Caitlin H... f t n I 1/ a, » r h . I J i j 1 / F , 30.6 meter i E 1 Eight Mile Point Rd public road Page 116 of 274 5f)-2010-A-39- Meghan Church, Caitlin H ... • wj 12 ------------ - <D Cq CC) 00 r- r" rn — -- ---- - -------- 4 - C14 ( ---- - ----- LL_ __ OD (Y) Page 117 of 274 - - ----- ----- --- - Ln �D --------------- it Ln C � ' N 3 Al 0-4 Page 117 of 274 r - � Y r } 4 + � V - �4 A r � • rat. r�, t w � Z- .ate y•. r ' i y 3 •r j' r Ti c C. ` 4 Q J 4 40 6 - � Y � Ile I If z� 50 - 2010 -A -39 - Meghan Church, Caitlin H... 25700 rev 4 -.73 PLAN MATERIAL - Plastic MalerjaI - MYlar Gauge - ¢.003 Inch. Pll GeSS - Photographic Ink — specia[ "T•' PLAN OF SURVEY OF LOT 26, REGISTERED PLAN 780 TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH ORILLIA COUNTY OF SIMCOE 1974 INCH= 40 FEET SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE - - - I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 1 THIS SURVEY AND PLAN ARE CORRECT A K E AND IN ACCORDANCE. WITH THE SURVEYS ACT AND THE REGISTRY ACT AND THE .REGULATIONS MADE THEREUNDER : J�. < Al C 0 E - 2. THE SURVEY WAS COMPLETED ON THE 25th DAY OF JULY 1974 1 P 6 ,, }�.0 -9 974 ..^ Q � , �' - xrz-: 0 L.S. t ry HOUSE ANZfREV1' h, W. . 9 4. �.. I N � v . 4 T00LSHED ro 2q^ 2�2 /2.4 'FRAME o r 26.9 ,, COTTAGE l �o7'TO I-/ OG StONE �. � I �CQ /,�,F /R.J Y✓ood' StAd i� oG/2 vim:, t� ��_ f'. p To • O T 25 O l q CD Hip✓' f.. Q� a 6 N 12 OI W 438 7 0 CAHIAGUE DRIV �� °8 6 � / s�u.v6 ��- -_ ...-.. 3:v < rFoeyE>naYt E.✓E Page 120 of 274 5 f) - 2010 -A -39 - Meghan Church, Caitlin H... tnternatlonal Riverfeundafion Mr. Steven Farquharson Secretary- Treasurer, Committee of Adjustment Corporation of the Township of Oro - Medonte P.O. Box 100 Oro, ON LOL 2X0 Dear Mr. Farquharson; Proud Winner of the 2009 International Thiess Riverrrtxe File No.: 2010 -A -39 IMS No.: PVOC747C2 RE: Minor Variance Application— Reduce Interior Lot Line For Boathouse Meghan Church, Caitlin Hussey, Kathleen Sutherland, Owners Part of tot 22, Concession 1(Former Township of Orillia) 53 Eight Mile Point Road, Plan Lot 26, Plan 780 Township of Oro- Medonte, County of Simcoe Thank you for conferring with the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority (LSRCA) with regard to the above noted Minor Variance application. It is our understanding that the purpose and effect of this application will allow for the construction of an addition to the rear of the existing boathouse on an existing lot of record. We have reviewed this application for consistency with the Public Health and Safety Policies (Natural Hazards) of the Provincial Policy Statement (PPS), conformity with the Lake Simcoe Protection Plan (LSPP), and in accordance with Ontario Regulation 179/06 made under the Conservation Authorities Act. As you are aware, the subject property is located within the jurisdiction of the LSRCA, and is partially located within an area regulated under this Authority's Development,, Interference with Wetlands and Alterations to Shorelines and Watercourses Regulation (Ontario Regulation 179/06) made under the Conservation Authorities Act. This property is regulated for shoreline erosion allowance with associated 100 -year wave uprush (FE = 219.89 masl) and adjacent to an unevaluated wetland. A permit will be required for any future development within the regulated portions of the above noted property, prior to issuance of a municipal building permit. Based; on the above noted information and our review of the proposed Minor Variance application, we provide the following comments for your consideration: 1. Policy 6.45 -DP of the Lake Simcoe Protection Plan permits development in relation to existing uses, as long as it does not expand into a key natural heritage feature, key hydrologic feature and any Minimum Vegetation Protection Zone (MVPZ) associated with a feature. Policy 6.45- DP(d.) allows the expansion of an accessory structure within the above noted features, if there is no alternative to the expansion, and the expansion is minimized. Page '1 oft ft 120,Bayview Parkwny Box 282, Newmarket, Cl7to Y 471 - - ----�. Tel : 905.895.1281 1.800.465.0 -137 fax: 905.853.5881 t -Mail: info( u fsrca.on:ca Website: www.lsrca.on.ca A Watershed for Life Page 121 of 274 5f) - 2010 -A -39 - Meghan Church, Caitlin H... November 8, 2010 File No.: 2010 -A -39 1MS No. PVOC747C Mr. Steven Farquharson Page 2 of 2 Based on our mapping and the photographs of the site, the proposed addition to the existing boathouse will require the removal of some vegetation. There is opportunity on this site to offset the loss of vegetation by providing plantings at another location along the shoreline, to re- naturalize a portion of the shoreline. Policy 6.29 -DP of the Lake Simcoe Protection Plan requires the re- establishment of natural self sustaining vegetation to the extent feasible for any development permitted under policy 6.45 -DP. Please note, all plantings must be native, non - invasive, non- cultivar plantings. Based upon this review the LSRCA has no obiection to the above noted Minor Variance application, subiect to the folfowins conditions: 1. That -a permit be obtained under Ontario Regulation 179/06 from the LSRCA, prior to the issuance of a municipal building permit for the construction of the proposed industrial building, and any proposed development or site grading within the regulated portion of the above noted property, 2. That prior to any site alteration, proper erosion and sediment control measures must be in place. 3. That a planting plan be submitted, to the satisfaction of Township and LSRCA staff. The planting plan shall be the equivalent of the area to be disturbed for the boathouse addition, including any associated grading. Please advise the applicant that in accordance with the LSRCA's Planning and Development Fees Policy (April 23, 2010), the total fee for this application is $200.00. The applicant should be advised that currently this fee is outstanding and to please forward the above mentioned fee to the LSRCA as soon as possible. if you have anyquestions, comments, or require anything further from the LSRCA, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at 905- 895 -1281, extension 287, or by e-mail at i.walker @lsrca on.ca. Please reference the above file numbers in future correspondence. I trust this meets your requirements at this time. Please advise us of your decision in this matter. Yours truly .R4 Ian alker, BSc: Environmental Planner IW /ph C. Jeff Dashwood, Agent, 961 Kingston Road, Toronto, ON, WE 158 Charles Burgess, Senior Planning Coordinator, LSRCA S: \Env Plan \Plan Appls \Planning Letters \Minor Variances \Oro- Medonte \2010 \PVOC747. 2010- A39 .53EightMilePointRoad.Cryurch- Hussey- 5utherland.Iw - 1.docx Page 122 of 274 LakeSimcoe c4b) Region Conservation Authority November 8, 2010 File No.: 2010 -A -39 1MS No. PVOC747C Mr. Steven Farquharson Page 2 of 2 Based on our mapping and the photographs of the site, the proposed addition to the existing boathouse will require the removal of some vegetation. There is opportunity on this site to offset the loss of vegetation by providing plantings at another location along the shoreline, to re- naturalize a portion of the shoreline. Policy 6.29 -DP of the Lake Simcoe Protection Plan requires the re- establishment of natural self sustaining vegetation to the extent feasible for any development permitted under policy 6.45 -DP. Please note, all plantings must be native, non - invasive, non- cultivar plantings. Based upon this review the LSRCA has no obiection to the above noted Minor Variance application, subiect to the folfowins conditions: 1. That -a permit be obtained under Ontario Regulation 179/06 from the LSRCA, prior to the issuance of a municipal building permit for the construction of the proposed industrial building, and any proposed development or site grading within the regulated portion of the above noted property, 2. That prior to any site alteration, proper erosion and sediment control measures must be in place. 3. That a planting plan be submitted, to the satisfaction of Township and LSRCA staff. The planting plan shall be the equivalent of the area to be disturbed for the boathouse addition, including any associated grading. Please advise the applicant that in accordance with the LSRCA's Planning and Development Fees Policy (April 23, 2010), the total fee for this application is $200.00. The applicant should be advised that currently this fee is outstanding and to please forward the above mentioned fee to the LSRCA as soon as possible. if you have anyquestions, comments, or require anything further from the LSRCA, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at 905- 895 -1281, extension 287, or by e-mail at i.walker @lsrca on.ca. Please reference the above file numbers in future correspondence. I trust this meets your requirements at this time. Please advise us of your decision in this matter. Yours truly .R4 Ian alker, BSc: Environmental Planner IW /ph C. Jeff Dashwood, Agent, 961 Kingston Road, Toronto, ON, WE 158 Charles Burgess, Senior Planning Coordinator, LSRCA S: \Env Plan \Plan Appls \Planning Letters \Minor Variances \Oro- Medonte \2010 \PVOC747. 2010- A39 .53EightMilePointRoad.Cryurch- Hussey- 5utherland.Iw - 1.docx Page 122 of 274 5f) - 2010 -A -39 - Meghan Church, Caitlin H... Page 123 of 274 5f) - 201 -A -39 - Meghan Church, Caitlin H m (D U) (D U) 17 U 4%ft.0000 m co C) V � C) C 8 0 -4n DV I H VO -t -Affl Si fl ly 8 0 -4n DV I H VO V ls fl ly 4 l w'll 0 r z Rip - L L Ae O "Ill 10 AVC W?. allL NO 0519leAM) 3 k3W$ *4: 'Z ; bachr witu 40VA S'Not- ln lffl 24L 04 IOV AULMOM AKL Gkv j.7v WAUnS ;PL "Ifa qONvGM3')v ml cKv IONWZ Ow WW OW &5AW)IZ SIH� 'I : IVNI 3IV9LJIIU43 StOA!Abl� .1334 Otr - H3NI J?I61 30DVV5 j() ),J-NrlOo 171 H inos -4 0 dlHSNMO I 081 Nr IS ( '9Z jol 4 S 4 0 NVId ­ - wwj i � Page 124 of 274 5f) - 2010 -A -39 - Meghan Church, Caitlin H... C pp.o. :)ilgnd f r � ' V / I 1 { r' �� tf Y .��� avav *.Lvfi M 1 O f>. �xNl f Ju...e .v;x i �kxa O N Page 125 of 274 5f) - 2010 -A -39 - Meghan Church, Caitlin H... Page 126 of 274 CO U') 4 W _ .... m. s to Q r Ln A CM CO (Y) O O N Page 126 of 274 r � 4 / M i Y ; 1-,. r z - CI U r i . w x. Y_ • w r c f F ' Ad 41P *44k iF� J iT t r lk i • - �s r W •a in M. a- - �s r W •a in M. a- 5f) - 2010 -A -39 - Meghan Church, Caitlin H... Page 129 of 274 5f) - 2010 -A -39 - Meghan Church, Caitlin H... Page 130 of 274 5f) - 2010 -A -39 - Meghan Church, Caitlin H... Page 131 of 274 5f) - 2010 -A -39 - Meghan Church, Caitlin H... Page 132 of 274 r f � }� �{.t S'. :�• die A' '. • fi , ,' � ' , A l +,1 t s 1 f . ` toy i ,f�•� �\ J`. 5g) - 2010 -A-40 - Taras Sakharevych 61 Eig... TOWNSHIP OF ORO= MEDONTE OA '.: its' REPORT Application No: To: Committee of Adjustment Prepared By: 2010 -A -40 Steven Farquharson, Intermediate Planner Meeting Date: Subject: Variance Application Motion # November 18, 2010 (Taras Sakharevych) Plan 780, !Lot 30 61 Eight Mile Point Road Roll #: R.M.S. File #: 4346 r030- 012 -090 D13 -41021 REQUIRED CONDITIONS: I BACKGROUND: I The purpose of this report is to consider a Variance Application 2010 -A -40, for relief from the Township's Comprehensive Zoning By -law in relation to the required interior side yard setback provision for boathouses. ANALYSIS: PURPOSE OF APPLICATION: The applicant is proposing to construct a storey .and half boathouse which is proposed to have a total area of approximately, 57 m (616 ffl. The applicant is requesting the following relief from Zoning By -law 97 -95: Section 5.6 a) Minimum interior side vardi setback for a boathouse from the required .2 metres 6.5 feet to a proposed 0.6 metres 2 feet), FINANCIAL Not applicable; PO LICI ESILEGIS L.ATIO N: Does the variance conform to the general Intent of the Offfclal Plan? The property is designated Shoreline in the Official plan. Section D10.1 which contains the Shoreline policies in the Township's Official Plan sets out the following objectives: • To maintain the existing character of this predominantly residential area. • To protect the natural features of the shoreline area and the immediate shoreline. The applicant is not requesting an increase in boathouse shoreline coverage or a variance for building height, however is requesting a variance to the interior side yard setback.. The residential and accessory boathouse use requested interior side yard setback variance would appear to maintain Development Services Meeting Date November 18, 2010 Application No. 2010 -A-40 Page 1 of 5 Page 134 of 274 5g) - 2010 -A -40 - Taras Sakharevych 61 Eig... the character of the shoreline area. On this basis, the proposed variance would therefore conform with the intent of the policies contained in the Official Plan. Does the variance comply with the general Intent of the Zoning By- law? The subject property is zoned Shoreline Residential Exception 2 (SR *2) in Zoning By -law 97 -95. The intent of the By -law is to establish setback requirements, which assist in preserving the natural shoreline and maintaining the residential character. The purpose of the By-law for regulating the location and height of boathouses is to prevent over- development shoreline which would ultimately impact the character of the shoreline. The proposed boathouse meets the height provisions of the ,By- law and the percentage of water frontage occupied by the structure. The applicant has indicated the purpose of requesting a 0.6 metre setback from the interior side yard setback is to have minimal impact on the view of the lake from the dwelling. The purpose of the interior side yard setback is to provide for a degree of separation between boathouses and neighbouring properties. This separation is intended to ' provide adequate distance for drainage ° and maintenance of the boathouse on the subject property. It is noted that there is existing tree coverage along the north lot line which appears would have to be removed in order to accommodate the proposed boathouse. A site inspection revealed that the proposed boathouse would be situated closer to the north interior side yard lot line than the existing boathouse. Therefore, the variance is considered to not comply with the general intent of the Zoning By -law. Is the variance appropriate for the desirable development of the lot? Based on the site inspection, the proposed interior side yard setback for the proposed boathouse` would not appear to be appropriate for the desirable development of the lot. It should be noted that the existing mature cedar hedge and various other vegetation located along the north interior side, lot line as well as various other trees will have to be removed in order for the proposed boathouse to be constructed 0.6 metres from the interior lot line. This removal of the cedar hedge and various other vegetation is removing the visual buffer for the neighboring property. When a site inspection was completed by staff, it was noted that the neighbouring boathouses at,63 Eight Mile Point Road is within the required setback but the existing boathouse is a non- conforming structure, which was built prior to 1997. However, the boathouse at 63 Eight Mile Point Road is screened by a mature cedar hedge which provides visually privacy for the subject lands. Also, the neighboroughing property to the north being 59 Eight Mile Point Road was granted a variance for a single storey boathouse to be constructed 0.3 metres from the interior lot line. Due to the proposed boathouse being two storeys' in height, the impact is considered greater than a single storey boathouse. In addition to the concerns of privacy there is also concerns with the grading and maintenance of the boathouse within the interior lot line setback. If the applicant were to move the proposed boathouse into compliance with the 2 metres setback, it would be free from affecting any significant tree coverage, which will allow for maximum tree preservation on the property and allow for privacy with surrounding neighbours to be maintained. Also, the grading of the property would be such that no negative impacts on the neighbouring lot would be acheived. The applicant would also be able complete maintenance on the boathouse, while not trespassing on the neighbouring lot. Based on the above information the proposal to reduce the required interior side yard does not appear to be appropriate for the desirable development of the lot. Development Services Meeting ,Date November 18, 2010 Application No. 2010-A-40 Page 2 of `5 Page 135 of 274 5g) - 2010 -A -40 - Taras Sakharevych 61 Eig... Is the variance minor? As this application is anticipated to have an adverse affect on the privacy and character of the surrounding residentialr area, the proposed variance is not considered to be minor. [ransportation and Environmental Services- Building Department- Engineering Department — No Concerns' Lake Simcoe Conservation Authority- No Objection ATTACHMENTS: Schedule 1: Location Map Schedule 2: Site Plan In the opinion of the Planning Department, Variance Application 2010 -A -40, being to construct a boathouse within the required 2 metres to 0.6 metres, appears to not meet the four tests of the Planning Act, Respectfully submitted: Reviewed by: � ari. Steven uh B.0 Glenn White, MCIP, RPP Intermediate Planner Manager, Planning Services Development Services Meeting Date November 18, 2010 Application No. 2010 -A -40 Page 3 of 5 Page 136 of 274 5g) - 2010 -A -40 - Taras Sakharevych 61 Eig... SCHEDULE 1: LOCATION MAP 2010 -A -40 ;( Sakharevych) Development Services Meeting Date November 18, 2010 Application No, 2010 -A40 Page 4 of 5 Page 137 of 274 5g) - 2010 -A -40 - Taras Sakharevych 61 Eig... SCHEDULE 2: SITE PLAN 2010 -A -40 ( Sakharevych) Development Services Meeting Date November 18, 2010 Application No. 2016-A -40 Page 6 of 5 Page 138 of 274 5g) - 2010 -A -40 - Taras Sakharevych 61 By.. Page 139 of 274 o 0 z � N 2 z f Z I I fD o W I I O N F U N ca �$ I I � w w I j a � o z 5 I - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - RN. INUd 3216 1HN3 Page 139 of 274 5g) - 2010 -A -40 - Taras Sakharevych 61 Eig... Page 140 of 274 y 0 � 2 N e � wZ 2 U W ® MF 3 LL J 06 K M F W a z _ bw b a 0 m LL ae bW av ` a- ^_ ___ - :---- ---- - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - — - - _ - g - i $ Z cl ZO aw 0 4 - i $ � 4 U a o I N I 1 C5 Z o LL a � u K ed � 0 w r - J LL tort__ i I O K v _ 9 I I c Q r - ---------- ____--------- I pl Page 140 of 274 5g)-201o*.*0 -Tamu Sakharevych To DuW It LU 13 m w Iwo �-) l< Ix 4— 0 CK ^ ` ^ ' ( , .�. ' .. '~ ' ' ` ' ^ ' ` | ' | ' — LU W '` Page 141 of 274 5g) - 2010 -A -40 - Taras Sakharevych 61 Eig... Page 142 of 274 m� Z ; r1 a� L 6N 3g q� e goi _I 2� Lu p W p uj w O O W CJ y to Z ca m O genl Issazl IEZZt �' O Fla ? ? O O �o n wy ygg N z W Im y I (esezl_ as N J� izocsi Q iL LU 3N I fl 1 J , Page 142 of 274 5g) - 2010 -A -40 - Taras Sakharevych Page 143 of 274 b tig... JUL 2010 09: RON SILLICK LAW i TUO sat 01" r.vvv a " ' Ov t l C, CCCCCC m )330 ` p �u OG .061 0 A N1WN,L'0 ON3 37lOd /Ok38 h ° ~ _ Sf'St I +UM40 arse 30M l .00 . 9 0 f 173 ate. Q I h O� 1 Z ti i 01 I nugs.os maei3 ggggEE $� .0010 1I I ' o �iQ�� ) �(19SVid).00'OOt (13SVtd)3.00.6L.OtN NN + a' r OV9910 59989 /Vld o c[v02i > Imod aMW LH - DIa S* , (eau+ .0099 1 094 NV W allUL W3a W) RAIZIQ Snl)VIHVD } Page 143 of 274 5g) - 2010 -A -40 - Taras Sakharevych 61 Eig... JUL -28 -2010 09:65 RON SILLIGK LAW 1 705 329 5122 P.006 t O w 0. O i x 00 a � A Q a: .J O � wOwC) 4 t { >1 v � m w; x aa_ mE- 0 M i 4 O. Q. 't IOZ.'LZ R zz.).`1M' 3'W3 S.U31VM xg (w wnosxt ma xm,t + �;,gt,ZZ.toN y 1 - 3+n to as 301y .SB�S FFY Z .04•4 w 4—(►� (M • xaaa 1 TOTAL P:006' Page 144 of 274 5g) - 2010 -A -40 - Taras Sakharevych el tig... vvu-'40 vm:oa null �w t iVO.OZI U446 raves 4 Page 145 of 274 0 � v O C N V O I I i w ; w O W D h I I I A 1i O N v i U� O 0 I 0 10 0IL I: M 'Q.(L(L ts� c 1 I v mm � cd ` ) oot ZdV4 - _ '6b 3�' � d t '�` ,000Ot --^ (W) 001 - �tl)A OO'OOZ � ►- C! to � -T (VMtd),OO "00£ (ONWM 3ON3d34M)3„00.6L.OM -- $ µ-O ' W. 5 ,� b N4N�i, Zw o o 1 Page 145 of 274 5g) - 2010 -A -40 - Taras Sakharevych 61 Eig... �u - ao - a�iv ua Ltia RON SILLICK LAW 1 705 327 5122 P.005 Oooui aQ Q Q_ a o Z ��'WW LOri wv NN Q °►Q- Z�WQ z Z � a x z -, F--1 N�� }— 1, .."��~ _ LL' 3 Q ~ate w ° R O 4 U w Q W �} A 1 ...- •-- --"" v op �ZN in ' U- mho z o a z ` �� I -- O ° Ln a z r H a n < r ° Do W = � r" o A U] v o -- 1 cnZ °oz o� � d y,`�, 00" CL �Q °m z W Z ii L J ° w z� N vi 40 11-- .J 4 n z Oz O �� $ s r Z 0 ! } I) 0 ° RtWN.L'LL ON3 3903H 'o Q 3 Q Z z I '` L c H1a0N,SS'S ON3 3 a o ,sag +L w Q S �- 8 o y d z_ N S �x �'�" m U H1a0N.09•Z 8N3 33ri33 : : Q O HIWN,B'£ 0N38 3003H .9'99Y1 � (Yt'P£d).OL'1 K S .•E = y a En L,1 v w r r0 Ld at C a to A 3Q o 1 }' Page 146 of 274 5g) - 2010 -A -40 - Taras Sakharevych 61 Eig... i i PART 2 SURVEYORS REAL PROPERTY REPORT i Description of Land The lands are described in PIN 5856"105 (LT) as all of Lot 30 on Registered Plan 780 in the Geographic Township South Oriliia now in the Township of Oro- Medonte. The lands are known municipally as 61: Eight Mile Point Road. ftedistered Easements and /or Rights- of -Way Nil Encroachments Please note the hedge along the southem, northerly and westerly limits and the rail fence along the northerly limit and the board fence along the southerly limit. Compliance With Municipal Zonina By Laws , j Not certified by this report. Additional ,:Remarks There is a witness bar on each sideline near Lake Simcoe. There is an iron pipe at the southwest comer and at the northwest corner there is a witness SSIB which is 3 feet from the lot comfier in an easterly direction.; The position of the dwelling, the boathouse the well and their relationship to the boundaries can be seen on Part 1 of this Report. This Report to be read in conjunction with Part 1 of our Surveyor's Real Property Report being a Plan of Survey by Dearden and Stanton limited, Drawing C -7490 dated July 28, 2010. DEARDEN AND STANTON LIMITED ONTARIO LAND SURVEYORS CONSULTING ENGINEERS !' ORILLIA, ONTARIO Per: July 28,;2010 Jim Even, B.Sc., O.L.S., O.L LP. i i Page 147 of 274 5g) - 2010 -A -40 - Taras Sakharevych 61 Eig... Lake Simcoe Region Conservation In I o r n t a n a) Authority RiverfoundaWn Sentby email sfarquharson @oro- medonte.ca Proud Winner of the 2009 International November 8 , 2010 Thiess Riverprize File No.: 2010 -A -40 IMS No.: PVOC745C2 Mr. Steven Farquharson Secretary - Treasurer, Committee of Adjustment Corporation of the Township of Oro - Medonte P.O. Box 100 Oro, ON LOL 2X0 Dear Mr. Farquharson: RE: Minor Variance Application — Reduce Interior Lot Line For Boathouse Taras Sakharevych, Owner Part of Lot 22, Concession 1 (Former Township of Orillia) 61 Eight Mile Point Road, Plan Lot 30, Plan 780 Township of Oro - Medonte, County of Simcoe Thank you for conferring with the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority (LSRCA) with regard to the above noted Minor Variance application. It is our understanding that the purpose and effect,of this application will allow for the construction of an addition to the rear of the existing boathouse on an existing lot of record. We have reviewed this application for consistency with the Public Health and Safety Policies (Natural Hazards) of the Provincial Policy Statement (PPS), conformity with the Lake Simcoe Protection Plan (LSPP), and in accordance with Ontario Regulation 179/06 made under the Conservation Authorities Act. As you are aware, the subject property is located within the jurisdiction of the LSRCA, and is partially located within an area regulated under this Authority's Development, Interference with Wetlands and Alterations to Shorelines and Watercourses Regulation (Ontario Regulation 179/06) made under the Conservation Authorities Act. This property is regulated for shoreline erosion allowance with, associated 10¢ -year wave uprush (FE = 219.86 masl) and adjacent to an unevaluated wetland. A permit will be required for any future development within the regulated portions of the above noted property, prior to issuance of a municipal building permit. Based on the above noted information and our review of the proposed Minor Variance application, we provide the following comments for your consideration: 1. Policy 6.45 - DP of the Lake Simcoe Protection Plan permits development in relation to existing uses, as long as it does not expand into a key natural heritage feature, key hydrologic feature and any Minimum Vegetation Protection Zone (MVPZ) associated with a feature. Policy 6.45'- DP(d.) allows the expansion of an accessory structure within the above noted features, if there is no alternative to the expansion, and the expansion is minimized. _ Page- --of 2 1.20 Bayview Parkway �� Box 2.82, Newmarket, Ontario L3 4 - - -.. -- - -:- Tel: 905.895.1281 1.800.465.0437 Tax: 905.853.5881 is -Mail: into(4 isrca.ori.ca \Vebsite: www.Isrca.on.ca A WateX'5hed fioi Li` Page 148 of 274 5g) - 2010 -A -40 - Taras Sakharevych 61 Eig... is Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority November 8, 2010 File No.: 2010-A-40 IMS No.: PVOC745C2 Mr. Steven Farquharson Page 2 of 2 2. Based on our mapping and the photographs of the site, the proposed addition to the existing boathouse will require the removal of some vegetation. There is opportunity on this site to offset the loss of vegetation by providing plantings at another location along the shoreline, to re- naturalize a portion of the shoreline. Policy 6.29 -DP of the Lake Simcoe Protection Plan requires the re- establishment of natural ';self sustaining vegetation to the extent feasible for any development permitted under policy 6.45 -DP. Please note, all plantings must be native, non - invasive, non - cultivar plantings. Based upon this review the LSRCA has no obiection to the above noted Minor Variance' application, subiect to the following conditions 1. That a permit be obtained under Ontario Regulation 179/06 from the LSRCA, prior to the issuance of a municipal building permit for the construction of the proposed replacement boathouse, and any proposed development or site grading within the regulated portion of the above noted property. 2. That prior to any site alteration, proper erosion and sediment control measures must be in place. 3. That a planting plan be submitted, to the satisfaction of Township and LSRCA staff. The planting plan shall be the equivalent of the area to be disturbed for the proposed boathouse, including any associated grading; Please advise the applicant that in accordance with the LSRCA's Planning and Development Fees 'Policy (April 23, 2010), the total fee for this application is $200.00. The applicant should be advised that currently this fee is outstanding and to please forward the above mentioned fee to the LSRCA as soon as possible. If you have any questions, comments, or require anything further from the LSRCA, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at 905- 895 -1281, extension 287, or by e -mail at i.walker @lsrca.on.ca. Please reference the above file numbers in future correspondence. I trust this meets your requirements at this time. Please advise us of your decision in this matter: Yours truly, �- Ut Ian Walker, BSc. Environmental Planner IW /ph C. Taras Sakharevych, Owner, terry @drainrescue.com Charles Burgess, Senior Planning Coordinator, LSRCA 5: \En✓Plan \Plan Appis \Planning Letters \Minor Variances\ Oro- Medonte\ 2010 \PVOC74S. 2010- A- 40. 61EightMilePointRoad .Sakharevych.iw - "l.docx Page 149 of 274 5g) - 2010 -A -40 - Taras Sakharevych 61 Eig... Page 150 of 274 5g) - 2010 -A -40 - Taras Sakharevych 61 Eig... Page 151 of 274 R. O rA 0 r+ W r Q _ Ey 0 O 144 u Sf Y1 r.. rororo��M99444 i - r y Y m f ��, . QI m x az coo o E > 0 - a ��s A \ W Val SAW* cu 5G5 `!! 140 '9 V,.' 2 &r sAIU S { O cc I r r CN 4�, '''�} ` f!]901�,4pWt jt;:ya )pp,Bt61N 5 f `��1''A5A34LV1 v' �"` ♦��� ? a, avorr Mod a mrt sx -3ta sv "a Page 151 of 274 5g) - 2010 -A -40 - Taras Sakharevych 61 Eig... sleo m M T- All r h;- O C) Tl- C) CN '.1 Y a - I FS It �E113 .1 "Ncl, I Page 152 of 274 5g) - 2010 -A -40 - Taras Sakharevych 61 Eig... wl 9 U r 4 J 1' 14 1 ! ------------------------ cu ILL � 1 C / //� .� 7 7 g U / j x I Wrist O �-- t ! I i NN 1 r 4 ........ _... w. yq I Page 153 of 274 5g) - 2010 -A -40 - Taras Sakharevych 61 Eig ... I /A 11 caw f I LJ cu U) , %%.WOOO C) C) T � C) (N fi o f 0 Page 154 of 274 6 uj Page 154 of 274 5g) - 2010 -A -40 - Taras Sakharevych 61 Eig... Page 155 of 274 a Al Y @, C y K .m l L e i W in gy p '�z Cl 1 . � c x �A / mM — Adxl 1 O aA f _ I I I L� 4 n r r f fl 1 I Page 155 of 274 5g) - 2010 -A -40 - Taras Sakharevych 61 Eig... j rr jt'a ' �. .. 4 • L � t - 11 zt ,�Y x�"' � F • rte, .. � � � �;: „,� � : . Y z Page 156 of 274 5g) - 2010 -A -40 - Taras Sakharevych 61 Eig... Page 157 of 274 5g) - 2010 -A -40 - Taras Sakharevych 61 Eig... y, , � 1 vft: \ , t � r i ws � ,�YA&L M 1 • �' 4.. !: At I V _ � a • 1 . k ►� • +' " * 00 • �, f1�� `iJS ,.'�i'..� a . �n Y,��, rte. �. r ��.. I .r. � •' y ';d. ., ,f�ira Page 158 of 274 5g) - 2010 -A -40 - Taras Sakharevych 61 Eig... Page 159 of 274 L . 1 1 1 f 2 � R II $! ' �•�_ Iy �'. � � \� 1. [ J - 1� Y t` 4 1 • i`. b � ,r'i.x 5g) - 2010 -A -40 - Taras Sakharevych 61 Eig... Page 161 of 274 ,• N� \ . . 6 g ` - td 4. 1 • 3.s .} h d�b 'I Page 161 of 274 5g) - 2010 -A -40 - Taras Sakharevych 61 Eig... Page 162 of 274 5g) - 2010 -A -40 - Taras Sakharevych 61 Eig... Page 163 of 274 5g) - 2010 -A -40 - Taras Sakharevych 61 Eig... Page 164 of 274 5g) - 2010 -A -40 - Taras Sakharevych 61 Eig... llC I:L..��• I r Page 165 of 274 .74C:, i k Vr • 4 I r 1 � r C- • � *• . is .s YIG Y• � b r : Fu. yolks .. / Owe • !. y t ••a�d.r 0 ,- 1 5g) - 2010 -A -40 - Taras Sakharevych 61 Eig... 1 r . 1 r { • f J L.• P� ill' f � 1 r� A I Page 169 of 274 5g) - 2010 -A -40 - Taras Sakharevych 61 Eig... fi r x. .f T it r OW � x 1 Page 170 of 274 5g) - 2010 -A -40 - Taras Sakharevych 61 Eig... Page 171 of 274 ' IMF T � I S Mm Page 171 of 274 5h) - 2010 -A -42 - Cory Venable and Daniell... TOWNSHIP OF ORO- MEDONTE (5rdo REPORT REQUIRED CONbITIONS: The following conditions are required to be imposed on the Committee's decislon, with respect to the construction of a single detached dwelling on the subject property: 1. that the setback from the interior side lot lines for the dwelling and attached garage be in conformity with the dimensions as -set out on the application and sketches submitted and approved by the Committee; 2. that an Ontario Land Surveyor provide verification to the Township of compliance with the Committee's decision by: 1) pinning;, the footings, and 2) verifying in writing prior to pouring of the foundation by way of survey /real' property report that the distance from the single detached'> dwelling and attached garage, and the interior side lot fine, be no less than approximately 1.234 metres, 3. that the applicant obtain any permits and/or approvals, if required, from Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority, if applicable; and 4. that the appropriate zoning certificate and building permit be obtained from the Township only after the Committee's decision becomes final and binding, as provided for within the Planning Act R. S.O. 1990, c. P. 13, IBACKGROUND. The subject property occupies an area of approximately 0.18 hectares, has frontage on , Georgina Drive of approximately 30 metres, and a depth of approximately 63 metres, The property has an existing dwelling, as well as a garage attached to`the dwelling by a breezeway. The existing garage on the properly is currently located at approximately 4.05 feet (1.234 metres) from the interior side lot line to the north. at Development Services Meeting De November 18 201`0 Application No 2010 - A -42 Pagel of 10 Applicatlon No: To: Committee of Adjustment Prepared By: 2010 -A -42 Alan Wlebe, Planner Meeting, Date: ' Subject- Variance .Application Motion # November 18, 2010 (Cory Venable & Danielle Park) Lot 8, Plan 1561 Roll #: 4 Georgina Drive R.M.S. File #: 4346 -010- 006 - 03400. (Former Township Page 172 of 274 of Oro) D13 -41023 Page 172 of 274 5h) - 2010 -A -42 - Cory Venable and Daniell... The applicants are proposing to construct an addition to the existing garage attached to the dwelling on the subject property, consisting of an increase in the floor area of the existing garage, and the construction of a second storey approximately 7.2 metres in height above. grade. The construction of a garage addition is proposed to be located, as near as approximately 1.234 metres (4.05 feet) from the interior side lot line to the north. The purpose of this report is to consider Minor Variance Application 2010 -A -42, for relief from the Township's Comprehensive Zoning By -law in relation to the minimum required interior side yard ' setback for a single detached; dwelling in the Residential > One (R1) Zone. ANALYSIS: The applicant is requesting the following relief from Zoning By -law 97 -95: Residential One (R1) Zone Required Proposed Table 131 — Minimum Interior Side, Yard Setback 2.5 metres 1.234 metres =ANCIAL: _ Not applicable. POLICIES /LEGISLATION: Do the variances conform to the general intent of the Official Plan? The subject property is designated Shoreline in the Official Plan. Section C52 of the Official Plan states that "Permitted uses on lands designated Shoreline ... are single detached dwellings...". Therefore, on this basis, the proposed variance is considered to conform with the general intent of the Official Plan. Does the variance meet the general intent of the Zoning By law? The subject property is zoned Residential One (R1) Zone in the Township's Zoning By -Law. Permitted uses in the Residential One (R1) Zone include single detached dwellings. Table B1 of the Township's Zoning By -Law provides the minimum required setbacks for single detached dwellings, which includes a minimum required interior side yard setback of 2.5 metres. The purpose of the interior side yard setback is to provide access to the rear yard of the property, and to provide a degree of separation between dwellings on neighbouring' properties. The applicant is proposing to enlarge the existing garage attached to the single detached dwelling, constructed in 1970 and currently located as near as 1.234 metres from the interior side lot line to the north. The applicant is seeking a 1.234 metre interior side yard setback for the enlargement of the Development Services Meeting Date November 18, 2010 Application No. 2010 -A -42 Page 2 of 10 Page 173 of 274 5h) - 2010 -A -42 - Cory Venable and Daniell... existing non - complying building, where this enlargement would have the effect of increasing the amount of floor area and volume in a required yard. Section 5.1 6.1 of Zoning ,By -Law 97 -95 provides for the enlargement of a non - complying building, which states as follows: "A non - complying building or structure may be enlarged, repaired, replaced or renovated provided that the enlargement, repair, replacement or renovation: "a) does not further encroach into a required yard— "b) does not increase the amount of floor area or volume in a required yard; "c) does not in any other way increase a situation of non - compliance; and, "d) complies with all other applicable provisions of this By- law." A site inspection of the property revealed that there is currently a low -lying vegetative buffer �between the subject property and the property to the north,, which moderately obscures the neighbouring property's view of the existing non - complying building. This vegetative buffer would be anticipated to have an effect in reducing the visual impact of the proposed enlargement of the existing dwelling and garage, for the neighbouring property to the north. As the proposed enlargement of this existing non - complying building would be considered to increase the amount of floor area and volume in a required yard, at 1,234 metres from the interior side lot line, since this proposed enlargement would not further reduce the interior side yard setback, and would appear to comply with all other applicable provisions of the Zoning By -Law, the proposed variance is considered to meet the general intent of the Zoning By-Law. Are the variances appropriate for the desirable development of the tot? Based on a site inspection of the subject property, and of existing 'dwellings on properties in the immediate area, it was noticed that other properties have two- storey dwellings with attached garages, with little or no vegetative buffer between these dwellings and dwellings on adjacent properties. On this basis, and as the proposed variance is considered to conform to the general intent of the Official Plan, and meet the general intent of the Zoning By -Law, the proposed variance is considered appropriate for the desirable development of the lot. Are the variances minor? As the proposed variance is considered to conform with the general intent of the Township's Official Plan, to meet the general intent of the Township's Zoning; By -Law, and is considered appropriate for the desirable development of the lot, the proposed variance is considered to be minor, CONSULTATIONS: Transportation and Environmental Services- Building Department — Engineering Department — Development Services Meeting Date November 18, 2010 Application No 2010 -A -42 Page 3 of 10 Page 174 of 274 5h) - 2010 -A -42 - Cory Venable and Daniell... ATTACHMENTS: Schedule 1: Location Map Schedule 2: Survey Schedule 3: Site Plan. Schedule 4: Existing Front Elevation Schedule 5: Proposed Front Elevation Schedule 6: Proposed North Side Elevation CONCLUSION: In the opinion of the Planning Department, the proposal in Variance Application 2010- A -43, specifically, to permit a single detached dwelling and attached garage to be constructed as near as 1.234 metres from the interior side lot line to the north, appears to meet the four tests of the Planning Act. Respectfully submitted: Reviewed by: X nW be G lenn White, MCIP, RPP Planner Manager, Planning Services Development Services Meeting Date November 18, 2010 Application No. 2010 -A -42 Page 4 of 10 Page 175 of 274 5h) - 2010 -A -42 - Cory Venable and Daniell... SCHEDULE 1: LOCATION MAP 2010 -A -42 (Cory Venable & Danielle Park)' Development Services Meeting Date November 18, 2010 Application No. 2010 -A -42 Page 5 of 10 Page 176 of 274 5h) - 2010 -A -42 - Cory Venable and Daniell... SCHEDULE 2: SURVEY 2010 -A -42 (Cory Venable & Danielle Park) Development Services Meeting Date November Application No. 201O-A -42 Pag 18,201 0 D6 of 1'0 Page 177 of 274 .; dw / a � y Ne a � S, V Development Services Meeting Date November Application No. 201O-A -42 Pag 18,201 0 D6 of 1'0 Page 177 of 274 5h) - 2010 -A-42 - Cory Venable and Daniell... SCHEDULE 3: SITE PLAN 2010 -A -42 (Cory Venable & Danielle Park) Development Services Meeting Date November 1$ Application No. 2010 -A-42 Page 7 of 10 Page 178 of 274 5h) - 2010 -A -42 - Cory Venable and Daniell... SCHEDULE 4 EXISTING FRONT ELEVATION' 2010 -A -42 (Cory Venable & Danielle Park) 7 Development Services Meeting Date November 18, 2010 Application No. 2010 -A -42 Page 8 of 10 Page 179 of 274 5h) - 2010 -A-42 - Cory Venable and Daniell... SCHEDULE 5: PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION 2010 -A -42 (Cory Venable & Danielle Park) Page 180 of 274 5h) - 2010 -A -42 - Cory Venable and Daniell... SCHEDULE 5: PROPOSED NORTH SIDE ELEVATION 2010 -A -42 (Cory Venable & Danielle Park) Development Services Meeting Date November 18, 2010 Application No 2010 -A-42 Page 10 of 10 Page 181 of 274 5h) - 2010 -A-42 - Cory Venable and Daniell... v g d � I I g io I IR I' I I I g Man v g d � I I g io I IR I' I I I g r l j Page 182 of 274 5h) - 2010 -A-42 - Cory Venable and Daniell... Page 183 of 274 j r Y W ° � f � 'I � a L "oaf i I MR 4 a §iSQ I R jet R D T K IN M. T a °! T f. g 9�r I a I f ] �M o I ( 1+ Page 183 of 274 5h) - 2010 -A -42 - Cory Venable and Daniell... Page 184 of 274 5h) - 2010 -A -42 - Cory Venable and Daniell... Page 185 of 274 Q W Q L cu � W N LU c: J C N .4 1 Q U � Q F 4 W d t1 x h N m � � t/ N Page 185 of 274 5h) - 2010 -A -42 - Cory Venable and Daniell... Page 186 of 274 5h) - 2010 -A -42 - Cory Venable and Daniell... Tr _u �� z'_, i IVO ca cu r• / r f 000 y i p t S[ - 4 N .r x i iw w� i� r r � O r i i i4 O it N� 'x t Page 187 of 274 5h) - 2010 -A -42 - Cory Venable and Daniell... co .0 cu 1I N d' Q O O N Page 188 of 274 5h) - 2010 -A-42 - Cory Venable and Daniell... Page 189 of 274 5h) - 2010 -A -42 - Cory Venable and Daniell... Page 190 of 274 5h) - 2010 -A -42 - Cory Venable and Daniell... �,r��;�. � •mot•_ ,,.. _ H r 4 r y � � • L� a ins i "'" > 1 —�e1aY _ ,a � fir_-,; - •� . �. i i Page 191 of 274 5h) - 2010 -A -42 - Cory Venable and Daniell... see: T c R • , G T C�0 x � Y' D, ,+rt 4 f - Page 192 of 274 5h) - 2010 -A -42 - Cory Venable and Daniell... Page 193 of 274 5h) - 2010 -A -42 - Cory Venable and Daniell... p K • mar _�.�.�.�;; F. W W I i • � rr- .. 6 i , r1�. Y 1 f 4��} d• n • Page 194 of 274 5h) - 2010 -A -42 - Cory Venable and Daniell... Page 195 of 274 5h) - 2010 -A -42 - Cory Venable and Daniell... Page 196 of 274 5h) - 2010 -A -42 - Cory Venable and Daniell... Page 197 of 274 5h) - 2010 -A -42 - Cory Venable and Daniell... Page 198 of 274 •r • • • • � �� - ter � • • t 1 , A---v '`, �� y - I, F got { se S Al � e Page 198 of 274 5h) - 2010 -A -42 - Cory Venable and Daniell... T • tw WL - e / I ' 1 I - 1 { � I � 1 a 9 ti �i i 'r f Page 199 of 274 5i) - 2010 -A -43 - James Rogers 79 Stanley ... n y REQUIRED CONDITIONS: The following conditions are required to be imposed on the Committee's decision, with respect to the construction of a single detached dwelling, and attached decks, on the subject property: 1. that the setbacks from the front and; exterior side lot, lines for the dwelling and deck(s) be in conformity with the dimensions as >set out on the application and sketches submitted and approved by the Committee; 2. that an Ontario Land Surveyor provide verification to the Township of compliance with the Committee's decision by: 1) pinning, the footings,. and 2) verifying in writing prior to pouring of the foundation by way of survey /real property report that the distances between the noted , building/structure and the respective lot lines be no less than approximately the following: i. 2.95 metres from the front lot line, and 1.21 from exterior side lot line, for the deck(s); and ii. 4.74 metres from the front lot line, and 1.37 metres from the exterior side lot line, for the dwelling. 3. that an Ontario Land Surveyor provide verification to the Township of compliance with the Committee's decision by: 1) pinning the footings, and 2) verifying in writing prior to pouring of the foundation by way of survey /real property report that the single detached dwelling and deck not encroach into the sight line on the comer tot any more than to the "fine joining a point on the exterior aide lot line to a point an the front lot line, with each such point being [5.17 metres for the deck and 6.76 metres for the dwelling]' from the hypothetical point of intersection of the exterior side and the front lot line' ; 4, that the applicant obtain an Entrance Permit for the relocation of the driveway for access to the single detached dwelling on the subject property; Development Services Meeting Date November 18, 2010 Application No. 2010 =A -43 Page 1 of 11 TOWNSHIP OF ORO- MEDONTE DEPORT Application No: To: Committee of Adjustment Prepared By: 2010 -A -43 Alan Wiebe, Planner Meeting;`Date Subject: Variance Application` Motion November 18, 2010 (James Rogers) ; Plan 626, Lot 105 79 Stale Avenue Roll #.: R.M.S. File #: 4346.010010 -16200 (Former Township of Oro) D13-41024 Page 200 of 274 5i) - 2010 -A -43 - James Rogers 79 Stanley ... 5. that an Ontario Land Surveyor provide verification to the Township of compliance with the Committee's decision by way of survey /real property report that the distance between the driveway and the rear lot line be no less than 1.5 metres; 6. that the applicant obtain any permits and /or approvals, if required, from Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority, if applicable; and 7. that the appropriate zoning certificate and building permit be obtained from the Township only after the Committee's decision becomes final and binding, as provided for within the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P. 13: BACKGROUND: The subject property occupies an area of approximately 0.046 hectares, has a frontage on Stanley Avenue of approximately 17.94 metres, and a depth of ranging between 26.02 metres and 27..29 metres. The applicant is proposing to construct a two storey single detached dwelling with a first storey floor area of 99 square metres (1,066 square feet), standing 5.67 metres above grade, and located in compliance with the minimum required interior side yard setback (at 4.09 metres) and minimum required rear yard 'setback, at 7.95 metres), _ The proposed single detached dwelling`` is proposed, to be located within the 7.5 metre minimum required front yard, at 2.95 metres, within the 7.5 metre minimum required exterior side yard, at 1.21 metres, within the required sight line on a corner lot, and proposed to be accessed by a driveway located within the minimum 30 metre setback from an interior side lot line for a driveway accessing a single detached dwelling. The purpose of this report is to consider Minor Variance Application; 2010 -A -43, for relief from the Township's Comprehensive Zoning By -law in relation to the: 1. minimum required setback from the front lot line for a single detached dwelling and attached deck(s), 2. minimum required setback from the exterior side lot line for a single detached dwelling and attached deck(s), 3. construction of a building within the sight line on a corner lot, and 4. minimum' required setback from an interior lot line for a driveway" ANALYSIS: The applicant is requesting the following relief from Table 131 of Zoning By -law 97.95: Zone: Shoreline Residential (SR) Zone Required Proposed 1 Table 131 Minimum front yard 7.5 metres 2,95 metres 2. Table B1 Minimum exterior side yard 7.5 metres 1.21 metres 3 Section 5.34 — Sight lines on a corner lot - Buildings prohibited Buiiding within; sight line 4. Section 5.20.2.3 - Setbacks for driveways 3.0 metres 1.5 metres Development Services Meeting Date November 18, 2010 Application No. 2010 -A -43 Page 2 of 11 Page 201 of 274 5i) - 2010 -A -43 - James Rogers 79 Stanley... FINANCIAL: Not applicable. POLICIES /LEGISLATION: Do the variances conform to the general intent of the Official Plan? The subject property is designated Shoreline in the Official Plan. Section C5.1 of the Official Plan states that the objectives of the Shoreline designation are: • "To maintain the existing character of this predominantly residential area. • To protect the natural features of the shoreline area and the immediate shoreline • To ensure that existing development is appropriately services with water and sewer services. Section C5.2 of the Official Plan states that "Permitted uses on lands designated Shoreline are single detached dwellings...", and accessory uses. Therefore, on this basis, the four proposals for variances in the "Analysis" section, above, are considered to conform with the general intent of the Official Plan: Do the variances comply with the general intent of the Zoning By- law? The subject property is zoned Shoreline Residential (SR) Zone in the Township's Zoning By -Law. Permitted uses in the Shoreline Residential (SR) Zone include single detached dwellings and accessory buildings. Due to the effects of the dimensions and size of the subject property on the opportunity to construct a new single detached dwelling, the relief sought from Zoning By -Law 97 -95 are evaluated in consideration of the minimum lot area and minimum lot frontage provisions of the Zoning Table B# of the Zoning By -Law requires a minimum lot area in the Shoreline Residential (SR) Zone of 0.2 hectares, and a minimum lot frontage of 30 metres. The purpose for minimum lot area and minimum lot frontage provisions in the Zoning By -Law is to regulate the size and visual prominence of properties within specific zones, to ensure relative consistency in the character of properties on the basis of the respective zone(s) within which they are located. At approximately 0.046 hectares in size, with a frontage on Stanley Avenue of approximately 17.94 metres, the subject property is deficient in the minimum required lot size and lot frontage for a property in the Shoreline Residential (SR) Zone. With respect to "Non- complying lots ", section 6.17.1 of the Zoning By -Law states that "A lot in existenceprior to the effective date of this By -law that does not meet the lot area and/or lot frontage requirements of the applicable Zone, may be used and ;buildings thereon may be erected, enlarged, repaired or renovated provided the use conforms with the By -.law and the buildings or structures comply with all of the other provisions of this By- law." 1. Minimum required setback from the front lot line for single detached dwellings, and 2. Minimum required setback from the exterior side lot line for single detached dwellings 3. Construction of a building within. the sight line on a corner lot Development Services Meeting Date November 18, 2010 Application No. 2010 -A -43 Rage 3 of 11 Page 202 of 274 5i) - 2010 -A -43 - James Rogers 79 Stanley ... Table B1 of the Township's Zoning By -Law 97 -95 requires single detached dwellings to be located no closer than 7.5 metres from both the front and exterior side lot lines, and Section 5.34 of the Zoning By -Law prohibits the construction of buildings or structures in the sight line on a corner lot'. The purpose of the minimum required front yard setback is to ensure that a consistent character will be maintained within required yards that fronton a street and, in the case of a corner lot, the purpose of the exterior side yard setback is to ensure that this same character is maintained within yards that front on a street and to ensure that buildings and structures will not encroach into the required sight line for traffic approaching an intersection; The proposed variances request reductions in the minimum required front yard, from 7.5 metres to 2..95 metres, in the minimum required exterior side yard, from 7.5 metres to 1.21 metres and in the required sight line on a corner lot, from a line between hypothetical points on the front and exterior side lot lines located 7.5 metres from the intersection of these points to a line between hypothetical points located 517 metres from the intersection of these points. Based on a site inspection and the Topographic. Survey' submitted dated June 23, 2010, the subject property has an existing dwelling located at approximately 1.70 metres from the front lot line, at approximately 1.26 metres from the exterior side lot line (with architectural features encroaching up to 1.53 metres over the exterior side lot line), and,, based on the site plan drawing submitted, located within the sight line with the line crossing points on the front and exterior side lot lines located approximately 3.7 metres from the hypothetical point of intersection of these lot lines. Section 5.16 of the Zoning By -Law considers "Non- Complying Buildings and Structures ", and provides direction for their "enlargement, repair, replacement or renovation", provided that such work: "a) does not further encroach into a required yard ... b) does not increase the amount of floor area or volume in a required yard, c) does not increase in any other way a situation of non - compliance; and, d) complies with all other applicable provisions of this By -Law." Although the proposed dwelling does not further encroach into required yards than the existing dwelling, it would occupy a larger floor area in the required exterior side yard. With the exception of increasing the amount of floor area in the required exterior side yard and potentially increasing the volume of a building in the required front and exterior yards, the proposed dwelling does not in any other way increase a situation of non- compliance. Conversely, the proposed dwelling would decrease situations of non - compliance by encroaching to lesser extents than the existing dwelling, into the required front and exterior side yards and into the required sight line. Therefore, on these bases, the proposed reductions in the minimum required front and exterior side yard setbacks and in the required sight line are considered to comply with the general intent of the Zoning By -Law. I "For the purpose of this By -law, a sight line on a corner lot is a line joining a point on the exterior side lot line to a point on the front lot line, with each such point being 7.5 metres (24.6 feet) from the hypothetical point of intersection of the exterior side and the front lot line" (extract from Township of Oro - Medonte Zoning By -Law 97 -95, Page 44, Section 5.34) Development Services Meeting Date November 18, 20110 ` Application No. 2010 -A -43 Page 4 of 11 Page 203 of 274 5i) - 2010 -A -43 - James Rogers 79 Stanley ... 4. Minimum required setback from an interior lot line for a driveway Section 5.20.2.3 of the Zoning By -Law requires driveways that cross a front or exterior side lot line to be no closer than 3.0 metres to the interior lot line. The purpose for a minimum required setback for driveways from interior lot lines is to ensure an appropriate degree of separation between accesses to dwellings on adjacent properties. Based on a site inspection, the driveway accessing the dwelling on the property to the south of the subject property appears to have a setback from the interior lot line that is less than the 3.0 metre. Likewise, the driveway currently accessing the dwelling on the subject property, on Stanley Avenue, appears to be located; closer to the interior lot line to the west than the 1.5 metre setback proposed for accessing a new dwelling. Further, based on observations of nearby properties, driveways accessing single detached dwellings which are located at less than 3.0 metres from the interior side lot lines appear to be in keeping with the character of the surrounding area. Based' on line stakes inserted on the subject property and in the drainage ditch between the subject property and the road, denoting the proposed location of the driveway, there would appear to be a reasonable degree of separation between the driveway to the neighbouring dwelling to the south, and the proposed driveway accessing the proposed dwelling on the subject property. Therefore, on this basis, the proposed reduction in the minimum required setback for a driveway to the interior lot line is considered to comply with the general intent of the Zoning By -Law. Are the variances appropriate for the desirable development of the lots The variances sought from points 1 through 3 above, specifically, the minimum required front and exterior side yard setbacks, and the encroachment into the sight line on the corner lot, decrease situations of non - compliance in terms of degree of encroachment into these areas, as well as in terms Of the floor area occupied by the proposed' dwelling in the required front yard, as, compared with the existing dwelling. However, the proposed location of a new dwelling, as shown in Schedule 3 to this report, would increase a situation of non- compliance in terms of the floor area occupied in the required exterior side yard. Based on the "Front 313" and "Rear 3D" drawings submitted, as shown in Schedules 4 and 5 the proposed dwelling stands two storeys above grade. A site visit by Planning staff revealed that dwellings in the nearby area include single storey; one and a half storey, and two storey dwellings, many of which appear to be located within the ;required interior side yard(s). Therefore, as the proposed variances in the construction of the proposed two storey, dwelling appear to maintain the character of the surrounding area, the proposed variances from the front and exterior side yard setbacks, and the required- sight line' are considered appropriate for the desirable development of the lot. As the variance sought from point 4 above, specifically, the minimum required setback fora driveway from an interior lot line, would i allow access to a dwelling while maintaining an appropriate, degree of separation between the proposed driveway of the subject property and the adjacent property to the south, the proposed variance is considered appropriate for the desirable development of the lot. Development Services Meeting Date November 18,201 . 0 Application No. 2010 -A -43 Page 5 of 11 Page 204 of 274 5i) - 2010 -A -43 - James Rogers 79 Stanley ... Are the variances minor? As the proposed variances listed in points 1 through 4, above, are considered to conform with the general intent of the Township's Official Plan, to comply with the general intent of the Township's Zoning By-Law, and are considered appropriate for the desirable development of the lot, the proposed variances are considered to be minor. I CONSULTATIONS' I Building Department — Engineering Department — ATTACHMENTS: Schedule 1: Location Map Schedule 2: Topographic Survey Schedule 3. Site Plan Schedule 4: Front Elevation Schedule 5: Rear Elevation In the opinion of the Planning Department, the four proposed variances in Variance Application 201 A-43, specifically, to permit a single detached dwelling and attached decks to be constructed as near as 2.95 metres from the front lot line, 1.21 metres from the exterior side lot line, and within the sight line, and to permit a driveway to be located as near as 1.5 metre from an interior lot line, appear to meet the four tests of the Planning Act. Respectfully submitted: & t� Alan Wiebe Planner Reviewed by: Glenn White, MCIP, RPP Manager, Planning Services Development Services Meeting Date November 18, 2010 Application No. 2010-A-43 Page 6 of 11 Page 205 of 274 5i) - 2010 -A -43 - James Rogers 79 Stanley ... SCHEDULE 1: LOCATION MAP 2010 -A -43 (James Rogers) OW Z O p �SNa LAKE SIMCOE 0 25 50 100 SUBJECT PROPERTY Meters Development Services Meeting Date November 18, 201`0 Application No. 2010 -A -43 Page 7 of 11 Page 206 of 274 5i) - 2010 -A -43 - James Rogers 79 Stanley ... SCHEDULE 2, TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY 2010 -A -43 (James Rogers) Arl our VMT 7 CfTGI _ cis m TAOISM t - rte � ., 5 ' C,IL, diEOE i } 1 , ��,$� j 14$x.. 2a { t X73 t ZZrIft "PM Raxx P. f P — 01 I� 1 LIL ! { + J. zi ' ea for f rr ; { ANWKr +s t me c + { ' t� a8 iR � DFOM VAU ti Q Development Services Meeting pate November 18, 2010 Application No. 2010 -A -43 Page 8 of 11 Page 207 of 274 5i) - 2010 -A -43 - James Rogers 79 Stanley ... SCHEDULE 3: SITE PLAT 2010 -A43 (James Rogers) Page 208 of 274 c�Hwae v r W41 to _..� 4 _ / 74040- HOW war aNNA MW A*Mt � site lr�rm+iton G,e�en� ait.� , 6 0 Z 4, 2e �t thtft �a 4a Development Services Meeting Date November 18, 2010 Application No. 2010 -A-43 Page 9 of 11 Page 208 of 274 5i) - 2010 -A -43 - James Rogers 79 Stanley ... SCHEDULE 4: FRONT ELEVATION 2010 -A -43 (James ;Rogers) Development Services Meeting Date November 18, 2010 Application No. 2010 -A -43 Page 10 of 11 Page 209 of 274 5i) - 2010 -A -43 - James Rogers 79 Stanley ... SCHEDULE 5: REAR ELEVATION 2010 -A -43 (James Rogers) g Page 210 of 274 5i) - 2010 -A -43 - James Rogers 79 Stanley ... I t� O e � - W I > * 1 0 uj U Y Y 2� a a ��m 1 { CL u old NIN 3nn�3�v aosrra e2l5ba avmrF� ;nN o- rr7n I s xa t d t Ngb �lvktro ow/t Nre "2C?; o/ $ Y S 1:77 #" q • �'��� — ` A r 107 � I Hoi 107 s _ d F g5 � s 4S 107 Sol 107 B.g� YS l07 Rol 107 scl lo' sa::atE� dam: Page 211 of 274 5i) - 2010 -A-43 - James Rogers 79 Stanley ... Page 212 of 274 5i) - 2010 -A -43 - James Rogers 79 Stanley ... Date Printed: 02111/201 0 1 2:05:52 PM Re Path : \4SERVMCad\Custom CADD\Pro)ectsll D-30 -Jam" RogerslRogers ResIdanca- Oct28.rvt cn ry co V N N 3 D o < �c a p m CD CD %0'06 = — :e8eianoO % rwa .W9'£9V= :eBM7ol .w0'01 = :aBwenoo VIPIIng ;eeeLen0O 10 uu000'BZZ= :apw PB491u1d w£S9'VZZ= Lj0o1.47uawaseg wVZ£'VZZ - :OUNOoj 10 w01102 wBIS'LZZ = JDDI-j Pe451u1-j :PueDel Mpeuixpi on \\ L a ' ^- � a ^PRtl A4 \ i7 rl 7 / \ J Via+ aaoo / wM ;L Ot7otl Weor � Rinvd On Mild mu31s103a 3f1N3AV A31Md1S M7 �D NON Page 213 of 274 5i) - 2010 -A-43 - James Rogers 79 Stanley ... Page 214 of 274 5i) - 2010 -A-43 - James Rogers 79 Stanley ... Page 215 of 274 5i) - 2010 -A -43 - James Rogers 79 Stanley ... Date Printed: 0211 11201 0 12:10:23 PM Re Path : VSERVERICadlCustom CADD1Projectsll0 -30 -James Rogers \Rogers Residenr OW&rvt ?t Z m TI — w CD 8 i N 3 - . - -a 3 a = K 5D W N CD 3 CD 7 CD CD /� // ( / n � w ta'L wZ'D wQvv wZ'0 3 3 Ti'T'ITT�'Y il&S WE'L wtL'0 .ZZ'I 1V ued _ 3 _ 9H 3 51 3 I I a do a s I 3 ua4ol��i LI 3 i m 3 w_709FO w[s mtD'i wscz - I ® 3 w l9'0 I 48 0 L a --------- _ C' � a :- ._. apnnod N sJe00 I 3 .ta (od 3 flJ ._ bIaWV 1@07 9 W�aa L L aca w6B'tt oan r1 x' �H - is Page 216 of 274 5i) - 2010 -A -43 - James Rogers 79 Stanley ... Page 217 of 274 5i) - 2010 -A -43 - James Rogers 79 Stanley ... Page 218 of 274 t S� 3fIN3A Q � o Q Y / �z ' 0 / , �Y � C� ,�G0� 2 1 ! 5 W p x g W �t O O ! 1 7' a Z Y t EvP , 10 Page 218 of 274 5i) - 2010 -A -43 - James Rogers 79 Stanley ... -Oft I O M O Ir O N �YYY, pMt:+ l�lil r�M r'§ "���w.�Y�IYMMlMi�Y��v..n.W: Y�YrY�YM Y .TIYM + artw�M��w1YMtiYM��R�YIW.. h'±)MY 1 MilMi ii� R § * a y N � ,�,M iN't"Yw , Yaa14(7t4J4 #NS.'�� ea-4 YWxMla {w, a1 a.4 a1 • M >iitM pvs di ♦ ri � � 3 r I V- tit X 0 Jt is e O_ Page 219 of 274 5i) - 2010 -A -43 - James Rogers 79 Stanley ... Page 220 of 274 5i) - 2010 -A-43 - James Rogers 79 Stanley ... U$M 7u tu7S�LL� .W41d14wope s' WOt4=- 1oC1_'DOV 1 'Pascal UODVAL }W W4S hwt +,J e /) on �OVOOL�st wxi ► x ,e {aeu ING 977E 1(H{A F.•? / V t - fi?�4r lry Vyv t !� �� f�lh q tr/` ��' � � aIF+�'•�i7ittix� . � �� � _ _ r tu .zli >r CD LOhifptW J S ++ ti O � � � +tea •z�,qb i t�dt �\ ! � `"'�'...1 � .or n� 3nN3AV A31NVIS Page 221 of 274 5i) - 2010 -A -43 - James Rogers 79 Stanley ... Page 222 of 274 5i) - 2010 -A-43 - James Rogers 79 Stanley ... Page 223 of 274 5i) - 2010 -A -43 - James Rogers 79 Stanley ... Page 224 of 274 5i) - 2010 -A -43 - James Rogers 79 Stanley ... r t:• r ti i r !:t . 3 I ar 1 / � plot A!M , VMW _ t • WWI% - Page 225 of 274 5i) - 2010 -A -43 - James Rogers 79 Stanley ... Page 226 of 274 5i) - 2010 -A -43 - James Rogers 79 Stanley ... Page 227 of 274 R'K.f MAW ` �~- 4. • �; t Op as q 7` 4 a� Page 227 of 274 5i) - 2010 -A -43 - James Rogers 79 Stanley ... ! J M { .y 1: r � .i • k. + M1 q'�'1 1 � \, ill %• • '. }aa.!'.� It T s 64 V L • 'n r 4 � -C ! Page 228 of 274 5i) - 2010 -A -43 - James Rogers 79 Stanley ... Page 229 of 274 ..V w r10.v737� • 1 _ • I r s !1 i y'. y r • N .f -..ice �: r, i j` .', 1 ��/(/ � F Aft Page 229 of 274 5i) - 2010 -A -43 - James Rogers 79 Stanley ... �\ °� CL Ifz- U O O N �'t O •. -_ r , rte _s� n c f 7d CL ® ,0 CL �iC, y a. r - .t __ -,.• of �, b �k Y Page 230 of 274 5i) - 2010 -A -43 - James Rogers 79 Stanley ... Page 231 of 274 f • FF11 C 4 Ito- 2 1 Page 231 of 274 5i) - 2010 -A -43 - James Rogers 79 Stanley ... Page 232 of 274 a 1 `'.�� `y � ♦ V A mil• a Q i C) Qj S I M � r U C:) E,, Y:. - t _ N ^O l..L Page 232 of 274 5i) - 2010 -A -43 - James Rogers 79 Stanley ... Page 233 of 274 f n' ' C r - E ` ►.r'_!: ',t _ � :., flj � L . ,. r oom d _ i Page 233 of 274 5i) - 2010 -A -43 - James Rogers 79 Stanley ... • -Al, A a w - 1 Page 234 of 274 5i) - 2010 -A -43 - James Rogers 79 Stanley ... Page 235 of 274 F L !;o mig I r. I er 5j) - 2010 -A-44 - McDougall Auto Wreckers TOWNSHIP OF ORO- MEDONTE C REPORT Application No: To: Committee of Adjustment Prepared By: ; 2010 -A -44 Alan Webe, Planner Meeting Date: Subject: Variance Application Motion # November 18, 2010 (McDougall Auto Wreckers Ltd) Concession 14, Part Lot 14 328 line 14 North Roll #: R.M.S. File #:- 4346- 010 - 005-42800 (Former Township of Oro) ` D13 -41033 REQUIRED CONDITIONS: BACKGROUND: _ The subject property occupies an area of '12 acres, has: frontage on Line 14 North of approximately 178 metres, and a depth of approximately 271 metres The property has an existing dwelling and detached garage, as well as :a business consisting of a "parts shop and office". Further, the subject property has an existing wire fence currently located around a portion of the perimeter of the property. As stated in the application form and attached submission, the current use of the property is related to automotive parts and automotive recycling. The current use of the property, for the sale of "automobile parts" and "auto recycling" where the automobiles and automobile parts are stored outdoors, isnot considered to conform with the Provisions of Table A3 of the Township's Zoning By -Law 97 -95 "Industrial Zones" "Permitted Uses ". It has yet to be established whether "such use existed before the date of passing this By -law and has continued and continues;. to be used for such purpose, and that such use, when established, was not contrary to a By -law passed under Section 34 of the Planning Act or a predecessor thereof that was in force at that tiM'Y"r as provided in Section 5.18 of the Zoning By -Law 97 -95. The applicant is proposing to construct a chain link fence with barbed wire, standing 2.43 metres (7,97 feet) above grade, and a sheet -metal fence, standing 2.44 metres (8 feet) above grade, surrounding the subject property. The fence sections are proposed to be located between 2 cm and 50 cm from the front, interior side, and rear lot lines. The purpose for Variance Application 2010 -A-44, as stated in the appendix to the application, is to: "f. Improve the security of [their] inventory. 2. improve the look of [the] property and business. 3. Increase safety for [their] customers, and people within [their] community. "' Development Services Meeting Date November 18, 2010 Application No. 2010-A-44 Page 1 of 7 Page 237 of 274 5j) - 2010 -A -44 - McDougall Auto Wreckers ANALYSIS: The applicant is requesting the following relief from Table B1 of Zoning By -law 97 -95; Section 6.0!- Definition of "Structure" Required Proposed Fence height deemed not to be a structure 18 metres or less 2.44 metres FINANCIAL: Not applicable. POLICIES /LEGISLATION: Does the variance conform to the general intent of the Official Plan? The subject property is designated Agricultural in the Official Plan. Section C1.1 of the Official Plan states that the objectives of the Shoreline designation are: • "To maintain and preserve the agricultural resource base of the Township. • To protect land suitable for agricultural production from development and land uses unrelated to agriculture. • To promote the agricultural industry and associated activities and enhance their capacity to contribute to the economy of the Township. • To preserve and promote the agricultural character of the Township and the maintenance of the open countryside." Section C1.2 of the Official Plan states that "The principle use of land in the Agricultural designation .. shall be agriculture ... [and] All existing commercial and industrial uses are also permitted'. Section E1.5.1 and E1`.5.2 of the Official Plan, " Non - Conforming; Uses ", state that: El. 5.1 introduction As a general rule, existing uses that do not conform with the policies of this Plan should gradually be phased out so that the affected land use may, change to a use which is in conformity with the goals of the Official Plan and the intent of the implementing Zoning By-law. In some instances, it may be necessary and practical to allow the replacement; extension or enlargement of non - conforming uses through the granting of a minor variance or by placing the use in an appropriate zone in`the implementing Zoning By-law.. Council shall, therefore, have regard for the following principles: a) The feasibility of acquiring the property for holding, sale, lease or development by the Township for a more- appropriate permitted use; and, b) The possibility of relocating the non- conforming use to another site. E1.5.2 Role Of The Committee Of Adjustment Development Services Meeting Date November 18, 2010 -Application No. 2010 -A -44 Page 2 of 7 Page 238 of 274 5j) - 2010 -A -44 - McDougall Auto Wreckers If the property cannot be acquired or relocated, the Committee of Adjustment may, without an amendment to this Plan, allow extensions to a non- conforming use. Prior to such approval, the Committee shall consider the following: a) The size of the extension an relation to the existing operation; b) Whether the proposed extension is compatible with the character of the surrounding area; c) The characteristics of the existing use in relation to noise, vibration, fumes, dust, smoke, odours, lighting and traffic generation and the ;degree 'to which any of these factors may be increased or decreased by the extension; d) The possibilities of reducing these nuisances through buffering, building setbacks, landscaping, Site Plan Control and other means to improve the existing situation, as well as minimize the problems from extension;. and, e) The conformity of the proposal with the applicable by-laws and policies of the County of Simcoe. Does the variance meet the general intent of the Zoning By -Jaw? The subject property is zoned Rural Industrial (IR) Zone in the Township's Zoning By -Law. Permitted uses in the Rural Industrial (IR) Zone include "Contractor's yards ", "Industrial uses" (dry), "Outdoor storage uses'; "Recycling establishments', "Service shops, light', and "Warehouses ". As previously noted, the use of the subject property, for the sale of "automobile parts" and "auto recycling" where the automobiles and automobile parts are stored outdoors, is not considered to conform with the Township's Zoning By -Law 97 -95. Section 5.18 of the Township's Zoning By -Law contains; provisions for non - conforming uses, as follows: 5.18 NON - CONFORMING USES No lands shall be used and no building or structure shall be used except in conformity with the provisions of this By -law unless such use existed before the date of passing this By -law and provided that it has continued and continues to be used for such purpose, and that such use, when established, was not contrary to a By -law passed under Section 34 of the Planning Act, RS.O 1990, cP 13 or a predecessor thereof that was in force at that time. With respect to the proposed construction of fencing with a height of up to 2.44 metres above grade, Section 6.0 of the Township's Zoning By -Law, "Definitions ", provides the following direction for the term "Structure": • "Means anything that is erected, built or constructed of parts joined together and attached or fixed permanently to the ground or any other structure. For the purpose of this By -law, a fence that has a heiaht of 1.8 metres t&9 feet) or less a retaining wall that has a height of 1.0 metre (3.2 feet) or less, a light standard and a sign shalt be deemed not to be.structures ( emphasis added) Is the variance appropriate for the desirable development of the lot? It is yet to be determined whether the variance is considered appropriate for the desirable development of the lot. Development Services Meeting Date November 18, 2010 Application No. 2010 -A -44 Page 3 of `7 Page 239 of 274 5j) - 2010 -A -44 - McDougall Auto Wreckers Is the variance minor? It is yet to be determined whether the variance is considered minor. CONSULTATIONS: Transportation and Environmental Services Building Department - Engineering Department — Schedule 2: Existing Site Plan Schedule 3: Proposed Site Plan In the opinion of the Planning Department, the proposal in Variance Application 2010 -A -44, specifically, to permit the construction of a fence on the subject property standing 2.44 metres above grade while being deemed not to be -a structure, should be deferred until it is determined whether the use of the subject property is considered a "non- conforming use" which, pursuant to the provisions of the Township of Oro - Medonte's Official Plan and Zoning By -Law 97 -95, would be permitted to exist on the property. Respectfully submitted: Reviewed by: & bjg _. Alan Wiebe Glenn White, MCIP; RPP Planner Manager, Planning Services opment Services ration No. 2010 -A -44 Page 4 of 7 Page 240 of 274 5J ) - 2010 -A -44 - McDougall Auto Wreckers SCHEDULE 1: LOCATION MAP 2010 -A -44 (McDougall Auto Wreckers Ltd.) Page 241 of 274 5j) - 2010 -A -44 - McDougall Auto Wreckers SCHEDULE 2: EXISTING SITE PLAN 2010 -A -44 (McDougall Auto Wreckers Ltd.) Development Services Meeting Mute November 18, 2010 Application IVo. 2010 -A -44 Page 6 of 7 Page 242 of 274 5j) - 2010 -A-44 - McDougall Auto Wreckers SCHEDULE 3: PROPOSED SITE PLAN 2010 -A -44 (McDougall Auto Wreckers Ltd.) Development Services Meeting Date November`18, 2010 Application No. 2010 -A *44 Page 7 of 7 Page 243 of 274 5j) - 2010 -A -44 - McDougall Auto Wreckers Application for NUnor Variance Appendix 1 McDougall Auto Wreckers Ltd. 328 Line 14 North Oro - Medonte, ON L3V 6H1 (705) 325 -2903 Reasons for variance requested:. We are submitting an Application for Minor Variance to the Committee of Adjustment for the Township of Oro - Medonte for the purpose of building a full perimeter fence on our property. Our fence plan includes a 2.13 in tall chain link fence topped with 30 cm of barb wire along the front (eastern) lot line that faces the road (Line 14 North). On the north, south, and west sides (the perimeter) our plan includes an 2.44 in tall solid sheet metal fence. The proposed fences would be detached from the main building The reasons for our application can be divided into three parts: 1. Improve the security of our inventory. 2. Improve the look of our property and business. 3. Increase safety of our customers, and people within our community. Full perimeter fencing would greatly improve the security of our inventory at McDougall Auto Wreckers Ltd. The current fence on the east (Fig. 1A,B), north (Fig. 2), and south (Fig. 3) edges of our property, at only 1.1 in tall, does not provide much of a barrier to humans and can be easily crossed. The entire western edge of the property does not have any fencing and faces an undeveloped woodlot (Fig. 4A,B). The previous owner had multiple issues with theft. For example, during the winter months thieves on snowmobiles would access the property, during the night, via the unsecured and isolated western edge of the property. They would then remove automobile parts such as fenders and tailgates and escape back up the trail (Fig. 4A). There are also several areas where the fencing has fallen down or has a missing gate on the east (Fig 5A), south (Fig 5B,C), and north (Fig 5D,E). Together these areas provide unobstructed access to our property and inventory. A sketch of the current fencing at McDougall Auto Wreckers Ltd. can be seen in Fig 6. A 2.44 m tall fence, both chain link with barb wire (Fig 7A -C) and sheet metal (Fig SA -C) is typical of other recycling facilities within Simcoe County and would be difficult to climb over. Further, the fence would obscure view of our inventory thereby preventing thieves from being tempted as they cannot see what we have. Our objective is to grow McDougall Auto Wreckers Ltd. from its current staff of 3 to more than 20 full -time employees; however our ability to grow depends on the long -term security of our inventory. A sketch of the proposed fence can be seen in Fig 9. A full perimeter fence is an established and proven method within the auto recycling industry of protecting company inventory. Page 244 of 274 5j) - 2010 -A -44 - McDougall Auto Wreckers Full perimeter fencing will improve the look of our property and business. On the east side of our property, the chain link fence will allow customers to view our office and garage building. Customer and delivery access will be orderly and safe through two large sliding fenced gates facing Line 14 North. The sheet metal fence on the perimeter of our property will be solid and well constructed. The solid perimeter fence will also block the view of crushed vehicles and scrap metal; unsightly areas typical of auto recycling facilities that will be contained behind our perimeter fence. Full perimeter fencing will improve the safety of our customers, and people within our community. An auto wrecking yard has numerous sharp materials that can be hazardous to unsuspecting or unaware people. As we grow our business the activity within our facility will only increase. A full perimeter fence with controlled access points will ensure customers and community members are protected from the hazards within our facility. . In summary, we are requesting permission from the Committee of Adjustment for the Township of Oro - Medonte to build the above described fence on our property. The success of our business depends on a good security fence, and we have based our design plans on the fences of other well- respected auto recycling facilities both in Simcoe County, and elsewhere in southern Ontario. Together, our chain link and sheet metal fences will provide customers and residents of Oro - Medonte with the image that McDougall Auto Wreckers Ltd. is a professional business that cares about the safety of its employees and customers, while also respecting and protecting the value of the inventory upon which our business depends. Page 245 of 274 5j) - 2010 -A -44 - McDougall Auto Wreckers 0 Page 246 of 274 Figure 1. Current fence on east side of property facing Line 14 North. 5J ) - 2010 -A -44 - McDougall Auto Wreckers Figure 2. Current fence on north side of property. Page 247 of 274 Figure 3. Current fence on south side of property. 5j) - 2010 -A -44 - McDougall Auto Wreckers Page 249 of 274 Figure 5. Examples of fallen fence of missing gates currently at McDougall Auto Wreckers Ltd. A) East side of property. B) South side of property. VLZ 10 9tZ a faces an undeveloped woodlot. saa� oaaM ojny IleOnoQoW - t t OZ - ([9 Figure 4. The western edge of the property does not have any fencing and 5j) - 2010 -A -44 - McDougall Auto Wreckers Page 250 of 274 Figure 5. Examples of missing gates currently at McDougall Auto Wreckers Ltd. C) South side of property. D) North side of property. 5j) - 2010 -A -44 - McDougall Auto Wreckers Figure 5. Examples of fallen fence of missing gates currently at McDougall Auto Wreckers Ltd. E) North side of property. Page 251 of 274 5j) - 2010 -A -44 - McDougall Auto Wreckers Figure 7. Examples of chain link fence with barb wire at another recycling facility in Simcoe County. The design for our proposed fence would look similar to this. Page 252 of 274 5j) - 2010 -A -44 - McDougall Auto Wreckers Page 253 of 274 Figure 7. Examples of chain link fence with barb wire at another recycling facility in Simcoe County. The design for our proposed fence would look similar to this. 5j) - 2010 -A -44 - McDougall Auto Wreckers t "It", MI - " a-R r0'1 Figure i Examples of e' t metal fence at another recycling facility Simcoe County. design our proposed fence would took similar to Page 254 of 274 5j) - 2010 -A -44 - McDougall Auto Wreckers Figure 8. Examples of a sheet metal fence at another recycling facility in Simcoe County. The design for our proposed fence would look similar to this. Page 255 of 274 5j) - 2010 -A-44 - McDougall Auto Wreckers E Zd 33 W U! 00 Q 4J u C a w O 1 t£ J wacn t- *y1 = ~ z tD r £ d z l;rV �lJl, t /J rno iLI Qe 3 O� Z O c ll cn dQ� 0 J 0 L! Z Q Q 00 ~ H-00 N v t n O m hi �N„ f►d 1SIAI H' OS) vmla0 CN A i k a a .R A a .082m, \ J F W I R solos " } c3 mo ` o o U 0 d I m �- N Ur Q 4 ">S- e ti a laal .S tJ 00 vi 3 a U- m ulL c M O 0MU- i J LL w () O N Z N �b' b'_Iyv t ti OD zH _ /.y Z W CL fA '297mS M a6D1 �.AC e92N - j L1 w isri _ O O O N a g l� �'...' r ' LI V � 0. a LL w a Z O � / S nNml a 1 � Z �I 0 Page 256 of 274 2010 -A-44 - McDougall Auto Wreckers F_ `•i lh •a O Z lJ 8 M of 1 Z c' Z _ r W i Z lr Q: Q S ~U °4jo a v ®O o z' O f z a Lr; a� JOB zZ Z -j a d ' Cr 0 01 — Vs a oU = m ti 41 3tv vm1NO (NOISIAI H1nOS) 4NV O C3 HOO m bJ �N17 17A 9 BTAr. � � r. .� . „A'•� a .66226 M le �' ¢ c g .96'QE N V m .og ti. p ; Q v— s= cg eUS ,� yy 01„ axbz i ku .ac Q u •� UO 4 UJ O O ? 3 tL Ct Uwv Oz0 wt6 W �`n� • „ z a �b' d3brty �C' O • ,a O z f2 m AnvK y. .i F— in _ 1 3 5 V Q �.` W S'69 a t L1 O L OL � O fA a �� F — V ` W a V z Q z r t O X S.l_ vi Q h q' A • J m�rr 2 �1 3 Page 257 of 274 5j) - 2010 -A -44 - McDougall Auto Wreckers L �6 U O s .. O �d� Gyp Q — �a_3NI1 CO G O p �Q U W p �fY � W i I Q 1 � !m O I� O N Page 258 of 274 5j) - 2010 -A -44 - McDougall Auto Wreckers a N n1 ©Z i Z m � l� r ►�� r� srt tr, a �,. M •G a 2 � �I 3 v1� (N isiA H OS) tfi�"i12�0 ° o ® rt e Cea . ps fly V L M C SE 'Svc FF � - _�► .ze sac IL r , O in a� Page 259 of 274 5J ) - 2010 -A -44 - McDougall Auto Wreckers a U f / �.q e 3 z �A„! 01 n, ¢ b n Li Z _ �� 4t {� a e i"j =+/v1 a {t�10tS1 N1f1gS1 diTllll(3 pre Vv a ex ` t , °' r. yR 9�d7p �y' ` i ET 4A it Y s q ®' L i o gew ze s8s — �£ To �^ i J'6 ,C ; �� 1 •� �.OSZI eyK1 y I CD w e R 4cr ~ ® CN a a Page 260 of 274 5j) - 2010 -A -44 - McDougall Auto Wreckers 000 CL V f - U cn CO bn LU r o = - N Page 261 of 274 r t r _, c i i 1 11' 0 5j) - 2010 -A -44 - McDougall Auto Wreckers 00* n � 4—j Q CL V O ® V ® QJ V LL V Uj N Page 264 of 274 r L F t f �l 1 J l 5j) - 2010 -A -44 - McDougall Auto Wreckers Page 266 of 274 • t fi �d r As. f 'A E L. 1 jL�`'. 0 I 3 5j) - 2010 -A -44 - McDougall Auto Wreckers i a _ A n i u� l� e lk 4� Q it Page 268 of 274 5j) - 2010 -A -44 - McDougall Auto Wreckers Page 269 of 274 y . on _�.t Jy• N r r � i� 5j) - 2010 -A -44 - McDougall Auto Wreckers Page 271 of 274 4 r f Lei ., .!r_ 0 f. r !I. L I i P s 1� C r 5j) - 2010 -A -44 - McDougall Auto Wreckers 000m*I Qj c h u� ,r U o .. txO 1 - � ® N Page 274 of 274