09 16 2010 CofA AgendaPage
3 -8
9 -43
44 -63
64 -76
77 -94
95 -115
116 -134 f)
1. OPENING OF THE MEETING BY THE CHAIR
2. ADOPTION OF AGENDA
a) Motion to Adopt the Agenda
3. DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST
4. ADOPTION OF MINUTES
a) Motion to Adopt Minutes
5. PUBLIC MEETINGS:
a) 2010 -A -32 - James Rogers
79 Stanley Avenue, Plan 626, Lot 105
Relief from minimum front yard, minimum exterior side yard, sight lines on a
corner lot and setbacks for driveways.
b) 2010 -A -31 - Catherine Jo -Anne and George Armstrong Thompson
21 Patterson Road, Plan 1719, RP 51 R -9538, Part 1
Relief from minimum interior side yard setback.
c) 201 0 -A -30 - Horseshoe Valley Lands Limited
Part of Lots 3 and 4, Concession 4
Relief from temporary construction and sales.
d) 2010 -B -28 - Gordon Arnaut
2600 Townline - East Part of Lot 12, Concession 14, RP 51R-36312 Part 1
Boundary adjustment.
e) 2010 -B -27 - Harvie Peter Johnstone, Douglas Hardy Johnstone, Edna Eileen
Ayers, Margaret Eileen Ayers, Norma Irene Harvie
451/421 Line 14 North, Concession 1, Part of Lot 12, Parts 1, 2, and 3,
Registered Plan 51 R20203
Boundary adjustment.
2010 -B -26 - UCCI Consolidation Companies Inc.
Lot 27, Plan M -187, Lot 23, Concession 5
Boundary adjustment.
6. NEW BUSINESS:
None.
THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO- MEDONTE
COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
MEETING AGENDA
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Thursday, September 16, 2010
9:30 a.m.
Page 1 of 134
Page
Committee of Adjustment Agenda - Thursday, September 16, 2010
7. NEXT MEETING DATE
Thursday, October 21, 2010 at 9:30 a.m.
8. ADJOURNMENT
a) Motion to Adjourn
Page 2 of 134
Present:
Staff present:
Bruce Chappell, Chair
Roy Hastings
Garry Potter
Lynda Aiken
Michelle Lynch
4a) - Motion to Adopt Minutes
THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO- MEDONTE
COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
MEETING MINUTES
Council Chambers
Thursday, August 19, 2010 9:30 a.m.
Steven Farquharson, Secretary Treasurer /Intermediate Planner
Alan Wiebe, Planner
Marie Brissette, Deputy Secretary Treasurer /Committee Coordinator
1. OPENING OF THE MEETING BY THE CHAIR
Bruce Chappell assumed the Chair and called the meeting to order.
2. ADOPTION OF AGENDA
a) Motion to Adopt the Agenda.
Motion No. CA100819 -1
Moved by Hastings, Seconded by Lynch
It is recommended that the Committee of Adjustment agenda for Thursday, August 19,
2010 be received and adopted.
Carried.
3. DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST
None declared.
4. ADOPTION OF MINUTES
a) Minutes of Committee of Adjustment of meeting held on July 15, 2010.
Motion No. CA100819 -2
Moved by Aiken, Seconded by Lynch
It is recommended that the minutes of the Committee of Adjustment meeting held on
Thursday, July 15, 2010 be adopted as printed and circulated.
Carried.
Page 1 of 6
Page 3 of 134
Committee of Adjustment Minutes — Thursday, August 19, 2010
5. PUBLIC MEETINGS:
a) 2010 -B -21 - Bryan and Daniel Lambert
839 Ridge Road West, Lot 26, Concession 5
Create a new residential lot. Application is in conjunction with 2010 -A -21.
Daniel Lambert, applicant, and Wayne Lambert, agent, were present.
Motion No. CA100819 -3
Moved by Aiken, Seconded by Lynch
It is recommended that the Committee of Adjustment denies Consent Application 2010 -
B-21, being to create a new residential lot fronting onto Ridge Road West, as the
application does not conform to the Township of Oro - Medonte's Official Plan, the
County of Simcoe's Official Plan or with applicable Provincial Policies.
b) 2010 -A -21 - Bryan and Daniel Lambert
839 Ridge Road West, Lot 26, Concession 5
Relief from the minimum lot area and lot frontage. Application is in conjunction with
2010 -B -21.
Daniel Lambert, applicant, and Wayne Lambert, agent, were present.
Motion No. CA100819 -4
Moved by Aiken, Seconded by Lynch
4a) - Motion to Adopt Minutes
Carried.
It is recommended that the Committee of Adjustment denies Variance Application 2010 -
A -21, being for relief from the minimum lot area and lot frontage requirements for the
creation of a residential lot, as the application does not satisfy the four tests required for
a Minor Variance under the Planning Act.
Carried.
Page 2 of 6
Page 4 of 134
Committee of Adjustment Minutes — Thursday, August 19, 2010
4a) - Motion to Adopt Minutes
c) 2010 -B -25 - David and Sylvia Beard
872 Horseshoe Valley Road East, Concession 11, West 1 /2 Lot 1 (Former Township of
Medonte)
Technical severance to create a lot which once existed as a separate parcel of land.
David and Sylvia Beard, applicants, and Shirley Partridge, agent, were present.
Motion No. CA100819 -5
Moved by Lynch, Seconded by Potter
It is recommended that the Committee of Adjustment, at the request of the applicants,
defers Consent Application 2010 -B -25 in order to allow the applicants to have
discussions with the County of Simcoe regarding access to the property off of
Horseshoe Valley Road.
Carried.
Page 3 of 6
Page 5 of 134
Committee of Adjustment Minutes — Thursday, August 19, 2010
d) 2010 -B -24 - 1802281 Ontario Limited
1099 Old Barrie Road West, Part of Lot 11, Concession 5
Create a new lot.
Greg Gemmel!, applicant, and Cam Sellers, agent, were present.
Motion No. CA100819 -6
Moved by Aiken, Seconded by Lynch
4a) - Motion to Adopt Minutes
It is recommended that the Committee of Adjustment grants provisional approval of
Consent Application 2010 -B -24, being to create a new lot fronting onto Line 4 North.
The land to be severed would have approximately 30 metres of frontage on Line 4
North, a depth of approximately 181 metres (594 feet), and an area of approximately 1.9
hectares (4.7 acres). The proposed retained lands would have a frontage on Old Barrie
Road of approximately 396 metres (1299 feet), a depth of approximately 159 metres
(521 feet), and an area of approximately 7.1 hectares (17.5 acres). The retained lands
would be the balance of Plan of Subdivision Application 2006 - SUB -02, subject to the
following conditions:
1. That three copies of a Reference Plan of the subject lands prepared by an Ontario
Land Surveyor be submitted to the Committee Secretary- Treasurer;
2. That the applicant's solicitor prepare and submit a copy of the proposed conveyance
for the parcel severed, for review by the Municipality;
3. That the applicant pay $2,000.00 for the lot created as cash -in -lieu of a parkland
contribution;
4. That all municipal taxes be paid to the Township of Oro - Medonte;
5. That the applicant apply for a rezoning of the property to remove the holding
provision;
6. And That the conditions of consent imposed by the Committee be fulfilled within one
year from the date of the giving of the notice.
Carried.
Page 4 of 6
Page 6 of 134
Committee of Adjustment Minutes — Thursday, August 19, 2010
e) 2010 -A -28 - Jesse McKerroll
3225 Line 7 North, Part Lot 1, Concession 8
Relief from minimum setback from front lot line for agricultural buildings.
4a) - Motion to Adopt Minutes
Jesse McKerroll, applicant, was present.
Roelof Knegt and Markus Schneider, neighbours, noted their support for the application.
Motion No. CA100819 -7
Moved by Potter, Seconded by Hastings
It is recommended that the Committee of Adjustment grants approval of Variance
Application 2010 -A -28, being for the construction of an agricultural building with a
setback of 23 metres from the front lot line, subject to the following conditions:
1. That an Ontario Land Surveyor provide verification to the Township of compliance
with the Committee's decision by 1) pinning the footing and 2) verifying in writing prior
to pouring of the foundation by way of survey /real property report that the proposed
agricultural building be located no closer than approximately 23 metres from the front
lot line of the subject property;
2. That the setbacks be in conformity with the dimensions as set out on the application
and sketches submitted and approved by the Committee;
3. That the applicant obtain any permits and /or approvals from Nottawasaga Valley
Conservation Authority, if applicable;
4. And That the appropriate zoning certificate and building permit be obtained from the
Township only after the Committee's decision becomes final and binding, as provided
by the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P. 13.
Carried.
Page 5 of 6
Page 7 of 134
Committee of Adjustment Minutes — Thursday, August 19, 2010
f) 2010 -A -29 - James Rogers
79 Stanley Avenue, Plan 626, Lot 105
Relief from minimum exterior side yard, minimum interior side yard, minimum rear yard
and minimum first storey floor area.
John Raimondi, agent, was present.
The Committee received correspondence from Joanne Taylor dated August 18, 2010,
Harold and Sue Regan dated August 19, 2010 and Marley and Jerry Greenglass dated
August 18, 2010.
Joanne Taylor, Harold Regan and Jerry Greenglass reiterated the concerns outlined in
their correspondence.
Motion No. CA100819 -8
Moved by Potter, Seconded by Hastings
4a) - Motion to Adopt Minutes
It is recommended that the Committee of Adjustment defeats Variance Application
2010 -A -29 as it is not in keeping with the neighbourhood nor is the application
considered minor.
6. NEW BUSINESS:
None.
7. NEXT MEETING DATE
Thursday, September 16, 2010, 9:30 a.m.
8. ADJOURNMENT
a) Motion to Adjourn.
Motion No. CA100819 -9
Moved by Potter, Seconded by Hastings
It is recommended that we do now adjourn at 11:39 a.m
Carried.
Carried.
Bruce Chappell, Chair Steven Farquharson, Secretary Treasurer
Page 6 of 6
Page 8 of 134
Application No:
201O-A-32
Meeting Date:
September 16, 2010
Roll #:
4346-010-010-16200
REQUIRED CONDITIONS:
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
REPORT
Subject: Variance Application
(James Rogers)
Plan 636, Lot 105
79 Stanley Avenue
(Former Township of Oro)
i. 2.95 metres from the front lot line; and
ii. 1.37 metres from the exterior side lot line;
58\ James Rogers
Prepared By:
Alan Wiebe, Planner
Motion #
R.M.S. File #:
The following conditions are required to be imposed on the Committee's decision, with respect to the
construction of a single detached dwelling on the subject property:
1. that the setbacks from the interior side and rear lot lines for the dwelling and deck(s) be in
conformity with Table B1 of the Township's Zoning By-Law 97-95;
2. that the setbacks from the front and exterior side lot lines for the dwelling and deck(s) be in
conformity with the dimensions as set out on the application and sketches submitted and
approved by the Committee;
3. that an Ontario Land Surveyor provide verification to the Township of compliance with the
Committee's decision by: 1) pinning the footings, and 2) verifying in writing prior to pouring of
the foundation by way of survey/real property report that the distances from the single detached
dwelling and deck(s) and the respective lot lines be no less than the following:
4. that an Ontario Land Surveyor provide verification to the Township of compliance with the
Committee's decision by: 1) pinning the footings, and 2) verifying in writing prior to pouring of
the foundation by way of survey/real property report that the single detached dwelling and
deck(s) not encroach into the sight line on the corner lot any more than to the "line joining a
point on the exterior side fot fine to a p0/nt on the front lot line, with each such p0/nt being [0.96
metres] from the hypothetical point of intersection of the exterior side and the front lot line";
5. that the applicant obtain an Entrance Permit for the relocation of the driveway for access to the
single detached dwelling on the subject property;
6. that an Ontario Land Surveyor provide verification to the Township of compliance with the
Committee's decision by way of survey/real property report that the distance between the
driveway and the rear lot line be no less than 1.5 metres;
Development Services Meeting Date September 16, 2010
Application No. 2010-A-32 Page 1 of 11
Page 9 of 134
7. that the applicant obtain any permits and/or approvals, if required, from Lake Simcoe Region
Conservation Authority, if applicable; and
8. that the appropriate zoning certificate and building permit be obtained from the Township only
after the Committee's decision becomes final and binding, as provided for within the Planning
Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P. 13.
I BACKGROUND:
The subject property occupies an area of approximately 0.046 hentaros, has a frontage on Stanley
Avenue of approximately 17.94 matven, and a depth of ranging between 28.02 metres and 27.29
metres. The applicant is proposing to construct a three-storey single detached dwelling with a first
storey floor area of 101.33 square metres, standing 10.574 metres above grade, and located in
compliance with the minimum required interior side yard setback (at 4.089 metres) and minimum
required rear yard setback (at 7.953 metres). The proposed single detached dwelling is proposed to
be located within the 7.5 metre minimum required front yard (at 2.95 motroo), within the 7.5 metre
minimum required exterior side yard (at 1.37 nnetrcs), within the required sight line on a corner lot,
and proposed to be accessed by a driveway located within the minimum the 3.0 metre setback from
an interior lot line for driveways.
The purpose of this report is to consider Minor Variance Application 2010-A-32. for relief from the
Township's Comprehensive Zoning By-law in relation to the:
1. minimum required setback from the front lot line for single detached dwellings
2. minimum required setback from the exterior side lot line for single detached dwellings
3. construction of a building within the sight line on a corner lot
4. minimum required setback from an interior lot line for a driveway
ANALYSIS:
The applicant is requesting the following relief from Table B1 of Zoning By-law 97-95:
Zone: Shoreline Residential (SR) Zone Reauired Proposed
1. Table Bi Minimum front yard
2. Table B1 Minimum exterior side yard
3. Section 5.34 — Si ht lines on a corner lot Buildings prohibited
4. Section 5.20.2.3 — Setbacks for dr 3.0 metres
FINANCIAL:
Not applicable.
7.5 metres
7.5 metres
58\ James Rogers
2.95 metre
1.37 metres
Development Services Meeting Date September 16, 2010
Application No. 2010-A-32 Page 2 of 11
Building within sight
line
1.5 metres
Page 10 of 134
POLICIES/LEGISLATION:
00 the variances conform to the general intent of the Official Plan?
58\ James Rogers
The subject property is designated Shoreline in the Official Plan. Section C5.1 of the Official Plan
states that the objectives of the Shoreline designation are:
• "To maintain the existing character of this predominantly residential area.
• To protect the natural features of the shoreline area and the immediate shoreline
• To ensure that existing development is appropriately services with water and sewer services."
Section C5.2 of the Official Plan states that "Permitted uses on lands designated Shoreline ... are
single detached dwellings .. .", and accessory uses.
Therefore, on this basis, the four proposals for variances in the "Analysis" section, above, are
considered to conform with the general intent of the Official Plan.
Do the variances comply with the general intent of the Zoning By-law?
The subject property is zoned Shoreline Residential (SR) Zone in the Township's Zoning By-Law.
Permitted uses in the Shoreline Residential (SR) Zone include single detached dwellings and
accessory buildings. Due to the effects of the dimensions and size of the subject property on the
opportunity to construct a new single detached dwelling, the relief sought from Zoning By-Law 97-95
are evaluated in consideration of the minimum lot area and minimum lot frontage provisions of the
Zoning By-Law.
Table B1 of the Zoning By-Law requires a minimum lot area in the Shoreline Residential (SR) Zone of
0.2 heotmves, and a minimum lot frontage of 30 metres. The purpose for minimum lot area and
minimum lot frontage provisions in the Zoning By-Law is to regulate the size and visual prominence of
properties within specific zones, to ensure relative consistency in the character of properties on the
basis of the respective zone(s) within which they are Iocated. At approximately 0.046 hectares in
size, with a frontage on Stanley Avenue of approximately 17.94 metres, the subject property is
deficient in the minimum required lot size and lot frontage for a property in the Shoreline Residential
(SR) Zone. With respect to''Non'connp|ying lots", section 5.17.1 of the Zoning By-Law states that "A
lot in existence prior to the effective date of this By-law that does not meet the lot area and/or lot
frontage requirements of the applicable Zone, may be used and buildings thereon may be erected,
enlarged, repaired or renovated provided the use conforms with the By-law and the buildings or
structures comply with alt of the other provisions of this By-law."
1. Minimum required setback from the front lot line for single detached dwellings, and
2. Minimum required setback from the exterior side lot line for single detached dwellings
3. Construction of a building within the sight line on a corner lot
Table B1 of the Township's Zoning By-Law 97-95 requires single detached dwellings to be located no
closer than 7.5 metres from both the front and exterior side lot lines, and Section 5.34 of the Zoning
Development Services Meeting Date September 16, 2010
Application No. 2010-A-32 Page 3 of 11
Page 11 of 134
58\-2O1O-A-32- James Rogers
By-Law prohibits the construction of buildings or structures in the sight line on a corner kd The
purpose of the minimum required front yard setback is to ensure that a consistent character will be
maintained within required yards that front on a Street and, in the case of a corner lot, the purpose of
the exterior side yard setback is to ensure that this same character is maintained within yards that
front on a street and to ensure that buildings and structures will not encroach into the required sight
line for traffic approaching an intersection.
The proposed variances request reductions in the minimum required front yard, from 7.5 metres to
2.95 mntnao, in the minimum required exterior side yard, from 7.5 metres to 1.37 nmetres, and in the
required sight line on a corner lod, from a line between hypothetical points on the front and exterior
side lot lines located 7.5 metres from the intersection of these points to a line between hypothetical
points located 6.96 metres from the intersection of these points.
Based on a site inspection and the Topographic Survey submitted dated June 23, 2010. the subject
property has an existing dwelling located at approximately 170 metres from the front lot |/ne, at
approximately 1.20 metres from the extehors/de lot line (with architectural features encroaching up to
1.53 metres over the exterior side lot line), and located within the sight line with the line crossing
points on the front and exterior side lot lines located approximately 4.56 metres from the hypothetical
point of ntersection of these lot lines.
Section 5.16 of the Zoning By-Law considers "Non-Complying Buildings and 8tnuctur*o^, and
provides direction for their "enlargement, repair, replacement or renovation", provided that such work:
"a) does not further encroach into a required yard ... b) does not increase the amount of floor area or
volume in a required yard, c) does not increase in any other way a situation of non-compliance; and,
d) complies with all other applicable provisions of this By-Law."
Although the proposed dwelling does not further encroach into required yards than the existing
dwelling, it would occupy a larger floor area in the required exterior side yard. With the exception of
increasing the amount of floor area in the required exterior side yard and potentially increasing the
volume of a building in the required front and exterior yanja, the proposed dwelling does not in any
other way increase a situation of non-compliance. Convense|y, the proposed dwelling would
decrease situations of non-compliance by encroaching to lesser extents than the existing dvve||ing.
into the required front and exterior side yards and into the required sight line.
Thernfnna, on these basea, the proposed reductions in the minimum required front and exterior side
yard setbacks and in the required sight line are considered to comply with the general intent of the
Zoning By-Law.
4. Minimum required setback from an interior lot line for a driveway
Section 5.20.2.3 of the Zoning By-Law requires d that cross a front or exterior side lot line to be
no closer than 3.0 metres to the interior lot line. The purpose for a minimum required setback for
driveways from interior lot lines is to ensure an appropriate degree of separation between accesses to
dwellings on adjacent properties.
' "For the purpose of this By-law, a sight Jine on a corner lot is a line joining 5 p0/nt on the exterior side lot line to a point
on the front lot line, with each such point being 7.5 metres (24.6 feet) from the hypothetical point of intersection of the
exterior side and the front lot line." (extract from Township of Oro-Medonte Zoning By-Law 97-95, Page 44, Section 5.34)
Development Services Meeting Date September 16, 2010
Application No. 2010-A-32 Page 4 of 11
Page 12 of 134
Based on a site inapeoUon, the driveway accessing the dwelling on the property to the south of the
subject property appears to have a setback from the interior lot line that is less than the 3.0 metre.
Lihevion, the driveway currently accessing the dwelling on the subject property, on Stanley Avenue,
appears to be Iocated closer to the interior lot line to the west than the 1 .5 metre setback proposed for
accessing a new dwelling.
Further, based on line stakes inserted on the subjec property and in the drainage ditch between the
subject property and the roed, denoting the proposed location of the drivovvmy, there would appear to
be a reasonable degree of separation between the driveway to the neighbouring dwelling to the south,
and the proposed driveway accessing the proposed dwelling on the subject property.
Tharaho/g, on this beais, the proposed reduction in the minimum required setback for a driveway to the
interior lot line is considered to comply with the general intent of the Zoning By-Law.
Are the variances appropriate for the desirable development of the lot?
58\ James Rogers
The variances sought from points 1 through 3 above, specifically, the minimum required front and
exterior side yard setbacks, and the encroachment into the sight line on the corner lot, decrease
situations of non-compliance in terms of degree of encroachment into these areas, as well as in terms
of the floor area occupied by the proposed dwelling in the required front yard, as compared with the
existing dwelling. Hovvever, the proposed location of a new dwelling, as shown in Schedule 3 to this
report, would increase a situation of non-compliance in terms of the floor area occupied in the
required exterior side yard.
Based on the "Front 3D" and "Rear 3D" drawings submitted, as shown in Schedule 4, and the "Third
Floor Plan" drawing aubmitted, as shown in Schedule 5, the proposed dwelling stands three storeys
above grade, with the third storey located above the northern most area of the western portion of the
proposed dvvoUing, and occupying an area of approximately 33.98 square metres (365.75 square
feet). Based on the building footprint information provided in Schedule 3, at 127.6 square metres
(1,373.47 square #»ed, this third storey occupies an area equivalent to approximately 27 per cent of
the footprint of the proposed dwelling. On the basis of the proposed location of the new dwelling
shown in Schedule 3, the majority of the floor area and volume of this third storey would be located at
greater than 7.5 metres from the exterior side lot line, and it would be entirely located outside of the
7.5 metre minimum required front yard.
A site visit by Planning staff revealed that dwellings in the nearby area include single storey, one and
a half storey, and two storey dwellings, many of which appear to be located within the required
interior side yard(s). Thenahzna, as the majority of the third storey of the proposed dwelling would be
located within the area of the property in accordance with the required aetbaoka, and the majority of
the proposed dwelling located within the required front and exterior side yards occupies only two
storeys, the proposed variances from the front and exterior side yard setbacks, and the required sight
line are considered appropriate for the desirable development of the lot.
As the variance sought from point 4 above, speoifioe|k/, the minimum required setback for a driveway
from an interior lot Une, would allow access to a dwelling while maintaining an appropriate degree of
separation between the proposed driveway of the subject property and the adjacent property to the
south, the proposed variance is considered appropriate for the desirable development of the lot.
Development Services Meeting Date September 16, 2010
Application No. 2010-A-32 Page 5 of 11
Page 13 of 134
Are the variances minor?
As the proposed variances listed in points 1 through 4, abovn, are considered to conform with the
general intent of the Township's Official P|an, to comply with the general intent of the Township's
Zoning By-Law, and are considered appropriate for the desirable development of the lot, the
proposed variances are considered to be minor.
CONSULTATIONS:
Transportation and Environmental Services-
Building Dnpartment
sewage system meets minimum required setbacks as per Part 8 of the Ontario
Building Code.
Engineering Department —
ATTACHMENTS:
Schedule 1: Location Map
Schedule 2: Topographic Survey
Schedule 3: Site Plan
Schedule 4: Front and Rear Preliminary Design
Schedule 5: Third Floor Plan Drawing
CONCLUSION:
In the opinion of the Planning Department, the four proposed variances in Variance Application 2010-
A-32, specifically, to permit a single detached dwelling to be constructed as near as 2.95 metres from
the front lot line, 1.37 metres from the exterior side lot line, and within the sight line, and to permit a
driveway to be located as near as 1.5 metre from an interior lot |ino, appear to meet the four tests of
the Planning Act.
Respectfully submitted:
A an Wiebe
nanner
Development Services
Reviewed by:
58\ James Rogers
Glenn White, MCIP, RPP
Manager, Planning Services
Meeting Date September 16, 2010
Application No. 2O1V'A'32 Page 6 of 11
Page 14 of 134
/
-_-- /
� ~
(
'~ /
/ / `` /
/ � � ��
' ` `
/� / ---`
/ .~ /
/
F;s
\
\ \
\ \
~' \
\
\ \ \ \ �
\ � ` \ )
SUBJECT PROPERTY
SCHEDULE 1: LOCATION MAP
2010-A-32 (James Rogers)
LAKE SIMCOE
'-'
58\-2O1O-A-32- James Rogers
-
OA 0
0 25 50 100
.=1.~~ , ~.." meters
Development Services Meeting Date September 16, 2010
Application No. 2010-A-32 Page 7 of 11
Page 15 of 134
RED PIAN 620
CULANT
STU4 .. • .
' ./ / / / / / 1 ./.. •tt / / / • ./ v .,-.) - - --- — - — '
..
1 ,,, -.!.`/ ,..•? - • -
2 2 . 3 c 63.69 1
I .
o —....
LT. iia 17_9+
P (R.P. 028 -
(am) .1
• 2 " 1
a , 1 8.36-
rti
m220.81
'
/L EOEj
•
n 1.7
— - -
- r -
FE
0,2
9
Development Services
AvH41.1
SCHEDULE 2: TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY
2010-A-32 (James Rogers)
•
srui
Amu WAD
CAMFLUNG
00
1-28 '
1:a5g Oc-
1
::4S 6,,,,, CAEINC W
..r■
.Vey
1:1
• N":"L 52.
g
.. . I
101
t P.I.N.
74040 - 0123(LT)
, I.B. (0.0.)
usuiREED
(0.12 N.)
-. 1049) ruotE
0.07 N.
DRISC
,
DRILLED c,-;"
?;
Wat. s • - •
0 7446'
s
22/, 9
5a) - 2010-A-32 - James Rogers
79 Stanley ...
tS
Meeting Date September 16, 2010
Application No. 2010-A-32 Page 8 of 11
Page 16 of 134
_ • ,
L,
L'Wreuert
UNI.aden
requrernanle
Faitlira lecidente to —1
"bp , onlapc1 mdrfloielr
4
- c
roocsed
-
/ ••••
-.•••
I -
-
74040 0123( 11)
;15c.p7-3.c-
texe
SCHEDULE 3: SITE PLAN
2010-A-32 (James Rogers)
STANLEY AVENUE
'(13Y ReGISTER:w PLAN 64)
,••
•
5a) - 2010-A-32 - James Rogers
79 Stanley ...
„ .= - 1/qtas , 49
It) aea
t a 4 —
Fx:rilea
SO' Rada. Fvon
crbm2.10 . 0+4 to
be warred Mow We
.%; CO3010ly \
\ (1)
.CE
"'-..
f r;::;,..,'"
, •-• -..., .i ,•-
Site r Looend:
Finished Flax: = 227.51Ern
Bottom of Focting: = 224.324m
Easement Ram: = 2245m
— Finished Grede: = 226,000rn
Lot Coverage:
LOt Area:
% Coverage: _
Bulking Footprint: =, 1276n'
= 4E3 5rn'
t
Development Services Meeting Date September 16, 2010
Application No. 2010-A-32
Page 9 of 11
CL
Prcposio Wax
°New*,
Page 17 of 134
SCHEDULE 4: FRONT AND REAR PRELIMINARY DESIGN
2010-A-32 (James Rogers)
5a) - 2010-A-32 - James Rogers
79 Stanley ...
f”"
a a
•
E.
2
Development Services Meeting Date September 16, 2010
Application No. 2010-A-32
Page 10 of 11
0
Page 18 of 134
Development Services
Application No. 2010-A-32
SCHEDULE 5: THIRD FLOOR PLAN DRAWING
2010-A-32 (James Rogers)
58\-2O1O-A-32- James Rogers
Meeting Date September 16, 2010
Page 11of11
Page 19 of 134
Date Printed: 27108/2010 108 38 PM File Path • RC:ADD RGadlCustom CADDIProjects110-30 - James RegerstRogers Residence-sug 25.mt
Z
010 tO
10
<
>
<
73 9)
f
CD
ID
CD
ID
g
0
VE1. J OZ a
t
•
AeluelS 6L
sJa6oH sawer - ZE - (es
Date Pf ifded: 27/08/2010 11 5654 AM Fe Pats : ACADD1 \ CanSCustom CADLAProjects31 0 30 James Rogersildogme Residence-aug 25,M
VE1. Jo 1.Z a
• :
r1 J
•-'
s ! Af
•
AeluelS 6L
sJa6oH sawer - ZE - (es
_Sfsfddff:7:33:M
.7.130PW7 . •
sadfs "
•
aaaan -1'06 4.aa
I„--
20 00.0 Storm /
069
5a) - 2010-A-32 - James Rogers
79 Stanley ...
STANLEY AVENUE
:9' lirl.;15TE11[11 PI 00
Pa-9c0213 New 0 I a,'•
r- 3-Staav l .. -0--
r
- .
( , Resafer.a0 ---
1040
I .. I• I
0 :74,
H
. I , ........i
..,irgfalra.
i 1 • z ------J i' ,
,s ,, 1 Vgt
, -- ---- P -N 1 t--
74040 -0123((T)
/
rki 'M
0202 -
— 5&I0&dlt0l0L00
Now Well
ata inhalation i eoend
Ian:shed 0ca
Rot :a anala.
Rasenaat ram:
anstad 010041-
Lei Coverall,'
Foolprat:
Lot Area
C...raeraa:
12.0az fina.--a3ta3paaj saffa?ralltaa 01002411- otapasaadau Gaya taastrapeaaaaa.0% :pa ea..;
Page 22 of 134
co
,
0
411002101 00.0
0,000004
Prom
221.510m
= 224.324m
224.55a, .
- 226.000m
= 1276a/
- 463.54W
= 27.50 . .
VW 93:55'1. t 0/413150114 Nat - Id 00eu
. 1 . ... East Elevation
, 0.2 • 1 • 96
Preliminary Design
79 Stanley Ave.
New 3-Storey Residence
Elevations
61469intao
_Th448969:9g1t
7 " 02 '?A`P.12-
,
Sw.ndflogit
r
2 South Elevation
0.2 1146
1 , North Elevation
0.3 1 76
Preliminary Design
79 Stanley Ave.
New 3-Storey Residence
Elevations
F..dpeint
P59t,t,
233.::2;.■
Se9ono or
2$O 22
Grade
226.0(n
2 West Elevation
0.3 1 95
0005 5 550
South
Cove
Porch
5a) - 2010-A-32 - James Rogers
79 Stanley ...
.386
Living
Room
r
C.set
Page 25 of 134
One-aau@Pisau 508601:15.380E06 ra • oc-ousPaiwal aovo wqscotiorrauuutiukt ,41ed aod
r
a)
L ._
VV Z 93 :1. 0 I 0?/90:4Z :5810 010C1
_
7,0
Master
taloa]
Eremite
• Terracc
•
.•••
•
•
1.1
n
Closet
5 45P
Master
Bedroom
Terract
C
Eremite
'a
CZ(
5a) - 2010-A-32 - James Rogers
79 Stanley ...
SC3
Page 26 of 134
7r.
c-oc• -or.sroVcv...ivo 5 t P.1.Pd
C
5a) - 2010-A-32 - James Rogers
79 Stanley ...
Look-ow:
c;11 C.,11. 1:1 - 0E-OL1,1,1,1:11,110, 10:1/0 :41Li
Page 27 of 134
1:Lag 11 010Z:ca.:a t11,,,„1
i
/
I i
7., .,
, 4
i , ......,
-i ,
, --
,
, ,-- ■ 1.))
, A
( , ,
! 0
\
\ , "
! A
,
, I
\ ,
,
I ,--
■,\
5a) - 2010-A-32 - James Rogers
79 Stanley ...
w
0
LL
o
0
0
0
Page 28 of 134
1
0
w
sin
STANLEY AVE UE
Low REINSTEREP PLAN NM
5a) - 2010 -A -32 - James Rogers
79 Stanley ...
ROM
Ell Inhimeltrr Dena:
MAW Floor: • 22T,612m
Bohn al Faadhu ■ 224.9
Eel Mal Floor. ■
FfnhhedCirades =popcorn
Lilt Y
Bulld Fadert • 127.11
VI LaiAi. =C ■am.
f . te .2711%
Page 29 of 134
5a) - 2010 -A -32 - James Rogers
79 Stanley ...
Page 30 of 134
5a) - 2010 -A -32 - James Rogers
79 Stanley ...
(1)
4D
Hi 3
N
Page 31 of 134
mim
•
-0∎. - • -_-
5a) - 2010 -A -32 - James Rogers
79 Stanley ...
Page 32 of 134
•
5a) - 2010 -A -32 - James Rogers
79 Stanley ...
Page 33 of 134
5a) - 2010-A-32 - James Rogers
79 Stanley ...
Page 34 of 134
7'7 • •
-
2010-A-32 (Rogers)
Proposed location of new driveway (from Simcoeside Avenue
:. - ' 7. • •:
' .1:
Proposed location of new driveway (from East side of subject property)
2010-A-32 (Rogers)
2010-A-32 (Rogers)
View of proposed exterior side yard (from South side of property)
2010-A-32 (Rogers)
Proposed front yard setback
2010 -A -32 (Rogers)
Proposed front and exterior side yard setback, and sight line
2010 -A -32 (Rogers)
Proposed front and exterior side yard setback, and sight line
Proposed front and exterior side yard setback, and sight line
: • ?r: • • •
2010-A-32 (Rogers)
5a) - 2010-A-32 - James Rogers
79 Stanley ...
Page 42 of 134
2010 -A -32 (Rogers)
Proposed interior side yard setback
...........
rt. '17nenthlp of 00— 0
Application No:
Meeting Date:
September 16, 2010
Roll #:
4346-030-012-26161
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
REPORT
To: Committee of Adjustment
5b\ Catherine Jo and Ge
Subject: Variance Application
(Catherine and George Thompson)
21 Paterson Road
Plan 1719,RP51R-S5D8 Part 1
(Orillia)
Prepared By:
Steven Farquharson, B.URPL
Intermediate Planner
Motion #
F.M.S. File it:
D10 40862
REQUIRED CONDITIONS:
The following conditions are required to be imposed on the Committee's decision:
1. That an Ontario Land Surveyor provide verification to the Township of compliance with the
Committee's decision by 1) pinning the footing and 2) verifying in writing prior to pouring of the
foundation by way of survey/real property report so that:
a) That the single storey industrial building be located no closer than approximately 2.0
metres from the east interior lot line
2. That the setbacks be in conformity with the dimensions as set out on the application and
sketches submitted and approved by the Committee;
3. That the applicant obtain any permits and/or mppruvals, if required, from Lake Simcoe Region
Conservation Authority, if applicable
4. That the appropriate zoning certificate and building permit be obtained from the Township only
after the Committee's decision becomes final and binding, as provided for within the Planning
The purpose of this report is to consider a Variance Application 2010'A'31. for relief from the
Township's Comprehensive Zoning By-law in relation to the minimum required interior side yard
setback for a structure within the Economic Development (ED) Zone.
The subject property has a lot frontage of approximately 33 metres on Patterson Road, a depth of
118 metres, and a lot area of 0.4 hectares. The subject property is currently vacant.
The applicant is proposing to construct a single storey industrial building occupying an area of 553
square metres, to be located in the north-east corner of the lot.
Development Services Meeting Date September 16, 2010
Application No. 2010-A-31 Page 1 of 5
Page 44 of 134
ANALYSIS:
The applicant is proposing to construct a single detached industrial building, wfth a total floor area of
557 square metres (6000 square feet). The property is zoned Economic Development Exception 119
(EO*119) Zone. The applicant is requesting the following relief from Table B3 of Zoning By-law 97
Table B3- Minimum Interior Side Yard Setback:
| FINANCIAL:
Not applicable.
POLICIES/LEGISLATION:
5b\ Catherine Jo and Ge
Required Proposed
6.0 metres 2.0 metres
Does the variance conform to the general intent of the Official Plan?
The property is designated Industrial in the Official PIan. Section C8 of the Plan states that the
primary permitted use of lands within this designation shall be manufacturing, assembly, processing,
fabrication, storage and/or warehousing uses and research establishments. Therefore, the
construction of a single storey industrial building would constitute a permitted use in the Industrial
designation.
On this basis the proposai is considered to conform with the intent of the Official PIan.
Does the variance with the general intent of the Zoning By-law?
The subject lot is zoned Economic Development Exception 119 (ED*119) Zone. The purpose for
regulating the interior side yard setback for building in the ED 2ona, is to ensure that such buildings
do not have an adverse effect on the surrounding properties. The neighbouring building located
approximately 7 metres from the interior lot |ine, with a driveway separating the building from the
interior lot line. A site inspection revealed that the proposed single storey industrial building would not
adversely impact access to the rear of the property, as the property is a corner lot there is 15 metres
from the west exterior lot line. In addiUon, the proposed building will otherwise meets with all other
Zoning By-law provisions (such as maximum height, front and rear yard setbacks) for structures
within the ED Zone.
The zoning exception that is placed on the property specifies that the rear yard setback to be 7.5
metres, which is to act as the minimum setback for bui|dings, structures and septic system from the
rear lot line serving as the Environmental Protection (EP) Zone boundary. The applicant is proposing
the structure to be located approximately 72 metres from the rear lot |ine, which will not have any
negative impact on the environmental feature. The subject property is regulated by the Lake Simcoe
Conservation AuthVrity, which will require the applicant obtain any necessary permits/approvals for
the LSRCA.
Development Services Meeting Date September 16, 2010
Application No. 2010-A-31 Page 2 of 5
Page 45 of 134
CONSULTATIONS:
Transportation and Environmental Services-
Building Department-
Engineehn0Department—
Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority-
ATTACHMENTS:
Schedule 1: Location Map
Schedule 2: Site Plan
On the basis of the above, the proposal is considered to comply with the general intent of the Zoning
Is the variance appropriate for the desirable development of the lot?
A site inspection revealed that the pnopoaedsingle e�>reyinUustha|building vviUbek)neted
approximately 9.0 metres from the nei hbouring building to the east. The site inspection also
revealed that the subject lands are located in an area of the Township, where surrounding lands
consist of mainly large industrial bui|ding, which are within the required 6.0 metre interior side yard
setback. The proposed ocation is clear of significant tree vegetation, which wifl allow for the
applicant to have minimal tree removal.
Based on the site inspection, the proposed building would appear to be appropriate for the desirable
development of the lot. The purpose for the applicant requesting a 2 metre setback from the interior
side yard setback is to ensure that there is sufficient land for parking, and vehicle movement for large
trucks that move product produced on site.
On this basis, the proposal is considered desirable for the appropriate development of the subject lot.
Is the variance minor?
As this application is deemed to be in conformity with the Official Plan, maintain the intent of the
Zoning By-Law, and constitutes appropriate development, the variance is considered to be minor in
nature.
CONCLUSION:
In the opinion of the Planning Department, Variance application 2010-A-31 to grant an increase in the
minimum interior side yard for a single storey industrial building from the required 6 metres to 2.0
metres, appears to meet the four tests of the Planning Act.
Respectfully submitted:
Steven Farquharson, B.URPL
Intermediate Planner Manager, Planning Services
Development Services
5b\-2O1O-A-31- Catherine Jo-Anne and Ge—
Reviewed by:
Glenn White, MC|P, RPP
Meeting Date September 16, 2010
Application No. 2010-A-31 Page 3 of 5
Page 46 of 134
bject Lands 21 Paterson Road
5b) - 2010-A-31 - Catherine Jo-Anne and Ge...
SCHEDULE 1: LOCATION MAP
2010-A-31 (Thompson)
PATERSON J
0
ft
z
Development Services Meeting Date September 16, 2010
Application No. 2010-A-31 Page 4 of 5
0 20 40 80 120 160
Meters
Page 47 of 134
D as)
Development Services
Application No. 2010-A-31
T
5b) - 2010-A-31 - Catherine Jo-Anne and Ge...
SCHEDULE 2: CONTEXT MAP
2010-A-31 (Thompson)
—PL S.I B.
N 59 °44
1?,'
2 35 00'
o.00'
25
PL. 1.8 .0
- W 4NGLE of
LOT , CONCESSION T I
PL.I.8.0
125-00
N59°45' 50"E 235.00'
FD ; 8
(DBS
FD.I 8
OD s
X
Meeting Date September 16, 2010
Page 5 of 5
Page 48 of 134
rE: s
HTL.
(
. ,
T
CC
n
• : -
M .: !......
'.. ....:; ;....;
''.... ..,':. 0...
..., N,
m:
1..M I :•::m. J..E=...:;:i'MP ; I
i i..!
! FCI:S • aMM:I.: M.,....:'
:!....; . .::•' ; .7.! ! L H„, I b .5.•
• ....5 ---,- . I 0 .0 0 - s -- l?
mm 4 '
NOTE
511r1N5 E :E iL . E.E Er; 1 5M 1iE E P L' • fs C! ...LC
(5, 'TM: 51 55-1 00;51 iLLIEL: 0 15 S 5 mss,m, rj
PCM: TL 5
Zr...L. 1 5.1 EL 55E:55 ,LL Css
SLL -
55551555 555
5b) - 2010-A-31 - Catherine Jo-Anne and Ge...
4 5EL
L:3f.
IS -
5 5
555551
4
Page 49 of 134
5b) - 2010 -A -31 - Catherine Jo -Anne and Ge...
Page 50 of 134
5b) - 2010 -A -31 - Catherine Jo -Anne and Ge...
Page 51 of 134
5b) - 2010 -A -31 - Catherine Jo -Anne and Ge...
Page 52 of 134
W
E
z
0
111
co
0
W
(.9
5b) - 2010 -A -31 - Catherine Jo -Anne and Ge...
1
Page 53 of 134
FOS 8.0.4ar;3
..„
11
. 4 1 4 1 4; 0;44 0
. f """”, ."..." a s ' •
: .
.4.
3
5b) - 2010-A-31 - Catherine Jo-Anne and Ge...
•",) ,;•‘" ("*.• •r",.
:7000
g' 0, 0 ft •-•‘.
4 4 4 01! 144 4,;,..? . 1 0.4 4
Zi
' 4444
4
44,
?
W iv LE4 o f
Pi..„1.B. 0
1"*".;
•••••••:;',..,/
235°2,0
TZ,
• L." .
e 't , t
•'••
Page 54 of 134
cu
E
z
0
LLI
•
co
0
a)
5b) - 2010-A-31 - Catherine Jo-Anne and Ge...
Page 55 of 134
L
0
W
(.9
5b) - 2010 -A -31 - Catherine Jo -Anne and Ge...
Page 56 of 134
5b) - 2010-A-31 - Catherine Jo-Anne and Ge...
Page 57 of 134
2010-A-31 (Georgian Equipment)
Distance between existing building on adjacent property and subject property
0% •
• --
F ANL 41V •
IIMEMEn-
01
0
N.)
5b) - 2010 -A -31 - Catherine Jo -Anne and Ge...
gtgt1t41011'
tk1b 9l+t o .Atitt T •
th 19 11ritiqg
ttitV
Page 59 of 134
2010 -A -31 (Georgian Equipment)
Proposed location of proposed building
01
Cr
N
w
2010-A-31 (Georgian Equipment)
Proposed exterior side yard setback
2010 -A -31 (Georgian Equipment)
Proposed distance from proposed building to interior lot line
01
0
N
O
O
D
w
2010-A-31 (Georgian Equipment)
Proposed distance from proposed building to interior lot line
•
. .
••.•°.•••
•••••••••- •
+44111,44,
filTntIfship qf
(Yrco4Afiecto.fate
Mold fieritage, Exerting FIctore
Application No:
2010-A-30
Meeting Date:
September 16, 2010
Roll #:
4346-010-002-15901
REQUIRED CONDITIONS:
BACKGROUND:
To: Committee of Adjustment
5c) - 2010-A-30 - Horseshoe Valley Lands L...
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
REPORT
Subject: Variance Application
(Horseshoe Valley Lands Limited)
Part of Lots 3 and 4, Concession 4,
Reference Plan 51 R30671
Lots 37 and 56
(Former Township of Oro)
Prepared By:
Alan Wiebe, Planner
Motion #
R.M.S. File #:
The following conditions are required to be imposed on the Committee's decision, with respect to the
construction of two mod& homes on the subject lots:
1. That the applicant apply for, and obtain, the removal of the Holding (H) Provision which
currently applies to the lands in which Lot 56 is located prior to the use of this lot for the
construction of a model home;
2. That the setbacks for the model homes be in conformity with the Residential One Zone with
Exception 140 (R1*140), in Zoning By-Law 97-95, as amended;
3. That all other forms of development associated with the model homes be in conformity with the
applicable Zoning By-Law 97-95, as amended;
4. That the applicant obtain any permits and/or approvals, if required, from Nottawasaga Valley
Conservation Authority, if applicable; and
5. That the appropriate zoning certificate(s) and building permit(s) be obtained from the Township
only after the Committee's decision becomes final and binding, as provided for within the
Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P. 13.
The applicant is proposing to construct two single detached dwellings to be used as model homes on
lots within Phase II of the Plan of Subdivision originally known as Laurel View Homes. Model homes
are proposed to be constructed on proposed Lots 37 and 56, Part of Lots 3 and 4, Concession 4, to
allow the applicant to display variety in the home options available to prospective purchasers.
Phase 1 of Laurel View Homes, which occupies lands to the north and to the east of the Phase II area,
began following the execution of the Subdivision Agreement between the Township of Oro-Medonte
Development Services Meeting Date September 16, 2010
Application No. 2010-A-30 Page 1 of 5
Page 64 of 134
and Laurel View Homes (HV) Inc., authorized in By-Law 2003-009. A Subdivision Agreement for
Phase II of the proposed development, currently in proposed red line draft format, has not been
executed by Council.
ANALYSIS:
The applicant is requesting the following relief from Zoning By-law 97-95:
Maximum Permitted Proposed
Section 5.36 b) — Temporary Construction and Sales 1 model home 2 model homes
FINANCIAL:
Not applicable.
POLICIES/LEGISLATION:
Do the variances conform to the general intent of the Official Plan?
5c\ Horseshoe Valley Lands L...
The subject lands are designated Horseshoe Valley — Low Density Residential in the Official P|an,
and are located within the Oro Moraine Boundary. Section C14.3.4.1 of the Official Plan states that
permitted uses in this designation "are single detached dwellings ... and accessory uses". The lots
on which the model homes are proposed to be constructed are located within a proposed plan of
subdivision.
Therefore, on this basis, the proposal for variance from the Zoning By-Law to permit the construction
of two model homes on two separate lots is considered to conform with the general intent of the
Official Plan.
Do the variances comp!y with the general intent of the Zoning By-law?
Lots 37 and 56, on which the two model homes are proposed to be constructed, are zoned
Residential One Exception 140 (R1*140) Zone, and Residential One Exception 140 Holding Provision
(R1*140(H)) Zone. The applicant 15 requesting a variance from Section 5.36 b) of the Township's
Zoning By-Law, as amended, which states as foliows:
"Section 5.36 Temporary Construction and Sales Uses
b) Nothing in this By-law shall prevent the use of land for a sales offic and/or a model hom
for the sale of dwelling units provided the dwelling units to be sold are to be Iocated on lands
within the limits of the Township of Oro-Medonte."
The number of model homes and/or sales offices to be constructed in an area is limited for various
reasons, including: to limit the extent to which the character of a residential area is changed by the
existence of buildings not being used as residences, and to limit the amount of traffic generated in an
area by such non-residential uses.
Development Services Meeting Date September 16, 2010
Application No. 2010-A-30 Page 2 of 5
Page 65 of 134
The applicant is proposing to construct two model homes, as opposed to two sales trailers/offices.
Once constructed, the model homes could be converted into a future single detached dwelling when
their use as model homes has been served. Since the model homes maintain a residential character,
the proposed variance is considered to comply with the general intent of the Zoning By-Law.
Are the variances appropriate for the desirable development of the lot?
As model homes, and the properties on which they are nonatn/ctod, are commonly developed with a
high degree of detail and to a high level of completion, and as a model home may be sold and used
as a residence in the future, once its use as a model home has been fulfilled, the proposed variance
is considered appropriate for the desirable development of the ots.
Are the variarices minor?
As the construction of model homes for sales purposes is common in new plans of subdivision, and
the model homes are proposed to be constructed on lots which are reasonably separated from one
another, the proposed variance is considered to be minor.
CONSULTATIONS:
Transportation and Environmental Services-
Buikdin0Dnpartment—Propnoa|mppearatomeetminimumatandonds.andaevverava|abi|hytVbo
verified.
Engineering Department —
ATTACHMENTS:
Schedule 1: Location Map
Schedule 2: Lot Development Plan
CONCLUSION:
In the opinion of the Planning Department, Variance Application 2010-A-30, to permit the construction
of two model homes on separate lots within a proposed plan of subdivision, appear to meet the four
tests of the Planning Act.
Respectfully submitted:
Planner
5c\ Horseshoe Valley Lands L...
Reviewed by:
Glenn White, MCIP, RPP
Manager, Planning Services
Development Services Meeting Date September 16, 2010
Application No. 2010-A-30
Page 3 of 5
Page 66 of 134
A
SCHEDULE 1: LOCATION MAP
2010-A-30 (Horseshoe Valley Lands Limited)
SUBJF :CT PROPERTIES
0 25 53 100
II 1 01111,, „1, Meters
5c) - 2010-A-30 - Horseshoe Valley Lands L...
Development Services Meeting Date September 16, 2010
Application No. 2010-A-30 Page 4 of 5
Page 67 of 134
u
-
l oin D5
- r ( -2377 3 '
11 iF
• rh
I !
.
I idriLakikak
[In
EY_
)
36
5
30
Development Services
Application No. 2010-A-30
27
SCHEDULE 2: LOT DEVELOPMENT PLAN
2010-A-30 (Horseshoe Valley Lands Limited)
yr
C5S
0
D:'
!A'
30. CO
60 vi
,,,..-.., 1?,
,......._
5; ,3•
° k
g
30.00
C3
2B
310 0
5c) - 2010-A-30 - Horseshoe Valley Lands L...
-II 45.1
-19
48
307
fi
rz •
- 'jPk 7
-
23.00 0.3
TA NOLF\fr,'
ORE SC Er\I f
t-
o
3
6g
k.
i ..–.
Milr.151 i K6116
r-n' --.1
-
_ 1,5-VMeJet ,
. RE45154TE '
ixi
k -
4
m ,
z __ _._.... 11 r 4 rsc57 ....,
(7_ ..?0 . co
- Fr; 40
I h
CP e2:
46
...,
4..
6 i
Meeting Date September 16, 2010
Page 5 of 5
1..rt
1 ti..nti
H
LJ
Page 68 of 134
:K
co
EF;
b
5.
'00
• 3 7
op
L.,
30.58
BLOCK
58
30.00
36 65
5 0 b 45
0
30.00 N .; N5816 N5816'35E N5816'35"E
"
* - 30.00 30.00 30.00
35 ,cx b
cn
64 to 0 5 1 O
in
44
. 0 9 0 0
30 „4 N58.3535E * N5816'35"E N5816'35"E
.00
30.00 30.00 30.00
43
34 cn o
63
(0 0
N5B15'35"E
30.00
62
- 0
P. 6 0 0
• N58'36
30.00
30.00
33
30.00
cn cn
O 61 1 . 0
o o
co N583635E
32 i.....,
co 30.00
30.00 ,in 6 0
0
0
31
30.00
30
30.00
29
30.00
28
30.00
97 6:1
( c0 (0
in
0
N5843
0
30.00
58 57
0 c:,
0673'20W
30.00 25.00
23.00
Nor, ..50`..)D t z 7.07
38 TANCLIWOOD
k) i,
(0 (D CRESCENT
30.00 N58•3635E
_----/ 25.00
ko cD ,,'
5 6
- c. 3 9 9
N)
30.00 cc] -
..1
'55
N58
30.00
N5Ag5"E
30.00
4 0
5c) - 2010-A-30 - Horseshoe Valley Lands L...
OUU
e:45
7.2
0
0
18.0
18.00
o
m
52
N51:116'35
30.00
z
53
0
0
48
N54303
31.61
49
30.89
N5847'55
A=8.02
N5816
30.00
30.00
2
NJ
47
N5410'3
34.74
46
30.84
0
61.73
BLOCK 69
60.14
cn
0
N51316 N5816'40
30.00 30.00
0
54 . 0 41
0
N5836'35E N5836'35
30.00 30.00
55 0
0 40 b
III
0 0
N5B16'35"E N5F3'36'35"E
30.00 30.00
0
0
30.14
N5B*36
30.00
42
20.00
Page 69 of 134
co
5;
17.11 \\_.
7 8. 29 1 7.1 0
0 37 36
4.00
23.00 12.87
:otai
Wicith: 4 • et
Depth ivian. flour:
•
rt
: i
12.9m
!1! !1! ■I; ■I■
.1. •
;dr '•
5c) - 2010-A-30 - Horseshoe Valley Lands L...
- 31.7.mn •
r --
25.16t,,
211.4.11.11,
MS
• ; •
■
(f! 1 h h 11111111111111111111 11111111111111
? •
, •
m.,1;;./ . • •
,
Page 70 of 134
GROUND FLOOR AREA - 177.25 sq m
GARAGE - 44.81 sq m
5c) - 2010-A-30 - Horseshoe Valley Lands L...
25.00 M
PROPOSED SINGLE STOREY HOME
SCALE. 1 I m
C 7 .; '1
Page 71 of 134
4 \ \ 1 \ ) \
-I \..- --- \
\ ■ 1 ,--
,
V)
3 t _-- - \
C ,
C13 ,
,
__ -,
,
\
\
>% --- \ \ \
‘ ,
\ ___ L —
N
(10)
■-
• Lot 37,1,
\ -ti-t
0
Cr) Lot 56 ■
<11
0
1 SUBJECT PROPERTIES
0 25 50 100
Meters
5c) - 2010-A-30 - Horseshoe Valley Lands L...
111
D
z
w
1—
z
0
0
Att —
Page 72 of 134
5c) - 2010 -A -30 - Horseshoe Valley Lands L...
Page 73 of 134
5c) - 2010 -A -30 - Horseshoe Valley Lands L...
Page 74 of 134
5c) - 2010-A-30 - Horseshoe Valley Lands L...
Page 75 of 134
2010 -A -30 (Horseshoe Valley Lands Ltd)
Proposed Lot 37
5d) - 2010-B-28 - Gordon Arnaut
2600 Townl...
: rcni;n:,1
Page 77 of 134
avmaassta........■ i Meters
0 25 50 100
To;m5Imp^^-
Application No:
2010-B-2@
Meeting Date:
September 16, 2010
Roll #:
434602000620500
I REQUIRED CONDITIONS:
I BACKGROUND:
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
REPORT
To: Committee of Adjustment
Subject: Consent Application
Gordon Arnaut
2600 Townline Road
East Part of Lot 12. Concession 14.
(Former Township of Medonte)
5d\-2O1O-B-28- Gordon A[n8Ut
2600 Townl...
Prepared By
Glenn White, Manager of
Planning Services
Motion #
R.M.S. File #:
D10-
The following conditions are required to be imposed on the Committee's decision:
1. That three copies of a Reference PIan for the subject Iarid indicating the severed parcel be
prepared by an Ontario Land Surveyor be submitted to the Secretary-Treasurer;
2. That the severed lands be merged in title with the 2508 Townline Road to the north (enhanced
lands, per Schedule #2), and that the provisions of Subsection 3 or 5 of Section 50 of The
Planning Act apply to any subsequent conveyance or transaction involving the subject lands;
3. That the applicant's solicitor prepare and submit a copy of the proposed conveyance for the
parcel severed, for review by the Municipality;
4. That the applicants solicitor provide an undertaking that the severed lands and the lands to be
enhanced will merge in title;
5. That the conditions of consent imposed by the Committee be fulfilled within one year from the
date of the giving of the notice.
The purpose of Consent application 2010-B-28 is to consider a boundary adjustment. The severed
land is Part of Lot 12, Concession 14, and it presently occupies an area of approximately 19 hectares
(47 aonaa), has frontage on Townline Road of approximately 525 metres (1,722.4 hset), and a depth
of approximately 328 metres (1.076 feed, and does not presently contain any buildings or structures.
The lands to be retained would have frontage on Townline Road of approximately 90 metres (295.3
feeU, occupy an area of approximately 1.27 hectares (3.14 acres), and presently contain a residential
dwelling. No new building lots are proposed to be created as a result of the proposed boundary
adjustment.
Development Services Meeting Date September 16, 2010
Application No. 2010-B-27 Page 1 of 6
Page 78 of 134
ANALYSIS:
The purpose of application 2010-B-28 is to permit a lot addition/boundary adjustment. No new
building lot is proposed to be created as a result of the lot addition.
FINANCIAL:
Not applicable,
POLICIES/LEGISLATION:
Township Official Plan
5d\-2O1O-B-28- Gordon A[n8Ut
2600 Townl...
The subject lands are designated "Rural", "Environmenta/ Protection One" and "Environmental
Protection Two" by the Township's Official Plan.
The severed Iands to be conveyed mostly contain Environmenta Protection One and Two !ands. The
applicant intends to add the severed lands to the adjacent lands to the north which are also owned by
the applicant. No new development of the severed lands are proposed rather only the consolidation
with the applicants adjacent lands (2508 Townline Road). As a result of the consent, the ecological
integrity of the natural heritage system is maintained by the consolidation of the lands and the
keeping of the land in one ownership. No development is proposed and no new lot wifl be created.
Since no development in terms of any new lots being created, an Environmental Impact Study (EIS)
is not required. The Nottawasaga VaIley Conservation Authority (NVCA) has reviewed this
application for boundary adjustment and the Authority has no objection to the application.
A small portion of the severed lands and all of the retained lands are designated Rural which permits
single detached dwellings. EJwellings are Jocated on the future enhanced lands and the retained
lands.
Section D2.2.2 of the Official Plan, "Boundary Adjustments", would apply to such a proposal, which
states as follows:
"A consent may be permitted for the purpose of modifying lot boundaries, provided no new
building lot is created. In reviewing an application for such a boundary adjustment, the
Committee of Adjustment shall be satisfied that the boundary adjustment will not affect the
viability of the use of the properties affected as intended by this Plan. In addition, the Committee
of Adjustment shall be satisfied that the boundary adjustment will not affect the viability of the
agricultural parcels affected."
Therefore, as the p boundary adjustment would not result in the creation of a new lot, nor
does it propose to modify the use of the parcels affected, the proposed boundary adjustment is
considered to conform to the intent of the policies of the Township's Official Plan.
Development Services Meeting Date September 16, 2010
Application No. 2010-B-27 Page 2 of 6
Page 79 of 134
County Official Plan
The subject lands are designated Greenland designation in the County of Simcoe's Official Plan.
Section 3.3.4 of the County's Official Plan, "General Subdivision and Development Po|iciVa^, states
that "Consents for the purpose of boundary adjustments and consolidation of land holdings are
permitted but shall not be for the purpose of creating new lots except as otherwise permitted in this
Plan. All lots created shall conform to all applicable municipal policies and bylaws."
On this basis, the proposed consent appears to generally conform to the policies of the County of
Simcoe's Official Plan.
Provincial Policy Statement
The Provincial Policy Statement does not contain policies directly related to Lot adjustments
(boundary adjustments) in the "Rural Areas" or "Nature Heritage" areas. The policies are related to
the creation of a new lot or development, which are not proposed by this application.
Zoning By-Law
The severed lands are zoned Agricultural/Rural (AIRU) Zone and Environmental Protection (EP)
Zone by the Township's Zoning By-Law. The lands to be enhanced and the retained lands are zoned
Agricultural/Rural (AJRU) Zone. The proposed boundary adjustment would result in the enhanced
lands occupying an area of approximately 21 hectares (52 acres), and the retained lands would
occupy an area of approximately 1 .2 hectares (3 acres). Both the enhanced and the retained lands
would comply with the provisions of the Zoning By-Law related to the minimum required lot area and
frontage for single detached dwellings on lands in the AIRU Zone.
On this basis, the appucation is considered to comply with the provisions of the Zoning
I CONSULTATIONS:
Public Works Department-
Building Department — Proposal appears to meet minimum standards.
Engineering Department —
Nottawasaga VaIley Conservation Authority — No Objections
I ATTACHMENTS:
Schedule #1 Location Map
Schedule #2- Context Map
5d\-2O1O-B-28- Gordon A[n8Ut
2600 Townl...
Development Services Meeting Date September 16, 2010
Application No. 2010-B-27 Page 3 of 6
Page 80 of 134
CONCLUSION:
It is the opinion of the Planning Department that Consent application 2010-B'28. for a boundary
eduatmerd, would appear to conform to the general intent of the Official Plans of the Township and
the County of Simcoe, and would comply with the general intent of the Township's ZVningBy'Lem/.
Respectfully submitted:
�ru
Glenn White, MCIP RPP
Manager, Planning Services
5d\-2O1O-B-28- Gordon A[n8Ut
2600 Townl...
Development Services Meeting Date September 16, 2010
Application No. 2010-B-27 Page 4 of 6
Page 81 of 134
3
FOX EAD, ROAD
SCHEDULE 1: LOCATION MAP
(2010-B-28 Gordon Arnaut)
OFO
I !
Li
SUBJECT LANDS
5d) - 2010-B-28 - Gordon Arnaut
2600 Townl...
0 70140 30 420 660
_ ,11.1wiri Meters
Development Services Meeting Date September 16, 2010
Application No. 2010-8-27 Page 5 of 6
TOWNSHIP OF SEVERN
Page 82 of 134
Development Services
RETAINED LANDS
SCHEDULE 2: CONTEXT MAP
(2010-B-28 Gordon Arnaut)
ENHANCED LANDS
LANDS TO BE CONVEYED TO 2508 TOWN LINE
5d) - 2010-B-28 - Gordon Arnaut
2600 Townl...
TOWNSHIP OF SEVERN
C) 25 50 100 150 200
„ Meters
Meeting Date September 16, 2010
Application No. 2010-B-27 Page 6 of 6
Page 83 of 134
• ,,t‘ N - rlON 4
,...
.•:?.,.:
l.. 1
.::,; • " /if )
\
7/ NG 50
'
1■.
Watershed
Counties
11 11
ONTARIO
September 9, 2010
Steven Farquharson, Secretary-Treasurer
Committee of Adjustment
Township of Oro-Medonte
P.O. Box 100
Oro, Ontario
LOL 2X0
Dear Mr. Farquharson;
Re: Application for Consent 2010-B-28
Part Lot 12, Concession 14, 2600 Town Line
Township of Oro-Medonte (Formerly Township of Medonte)
The Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority (NVCA) has reviewed this
application for consent to facilitate a boundary adjustment and we have no
objection to its approval.
Thank you for circulating this application for our review and please forward
a copy of any decision.
Sincerely,
Tim Salkeld
Resource Planner
Copy: Ralph Hough, NVCA Member, Oro-Medonte
5d) - 2010-B-28 - Gordon Arnaut
2600 Townl...
ihhahr,AWASAhhl: VALLE': ‘..ihh:SERVATION („hohth:.. for hhhh3h..1h,=:i
Chhtse AcirnirChthh (.....thhoerhath3r Ahht chi ail 110
hi,h; hi 14 Y') ?U 4:ohh 21 1 Weh:
Page 84 of 134
•
5d) - 2010 -B -28 - Gordon Arnaut
2600 Townl...
Page 85 of 134
5d) - 2010-B-28 - Gordon Arnaut
2600 Townl...
5 1
1 . .
Page 86 of 134
5d) - 2010-B-28 - Gordon Arnaut
2600 Townl...
•
Page 87 of 134
2010-B-28 (Arnaut)
Proposed boundary of severance (approximate)
2010-B-28 (Arnaut)
Existing dwelling on lands to be enhanced (to north)
2010-B-28 (Arnaut)
Existing dwelling on lands to be enhanced (to north)
2010-B-28 (Arnaut)
Existing dwelling on lands to be retained
5d) - 2010-B-28 - Gordon Arnaut
2600 Townl...
Page 92 of 134
. •.
• • • •, 4 .;
2010-B-28 (Arnaut)
Proposed lands to be conveyed
5d) - 2010 -B -28 - Gordon Arnaut
2600 Townl...
Page 94 of 134
• -;4•:•••:"‘*••',•:',•:::••'N'-'5„
) • • • A l„, ,
• • . . •.. . • „ . •
Application No:
2010-B-27
Meeting Date:
September 16, 2010
Roll 1:
4346-030-012-00800
1 REQUIRED CONDITIONS:
BACKGROUND:
Development Services
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEOONTE
REPORT
To: Committee of Adjustment
Subject: Consent Application
Harvie Peter Johnstone, Douglas
Hardy Johnstone, Edna Eileen
Ayers, Margaret Eileen Ayers.
Norma Irene Harvie
451/421 Line 14 North
Concession. 1, Part of hot 12. Pars
2. and 3 FiegstereO Ptan 51R2020',71
(Foricirowm;hip of Ortiliu)
5e) - 2010-B-27 - Harvie Peter Johnstone, ...
1 Prepared By:
Alan Wiebe, Planner
Motion tt
R.M.S. File 4:
010-
conditreits are r iniposeci 011 the Committee's decision:
1. I hal three .copies of Heference Hari for the 5LIbied land inciicatind the s parcel I
pro:poci by en Ontario...) I...and Surveyor be su'brnitto6 lo the Ser.:R.:Limy-Tic:a:31,3
2 That the severed tanns oo merged in title with the 25 acre lot to the nor', 1 ("LAY. pOr Sch.edule
ir3). and 7Llat the pmvis'ons of Subsection 3 or of Section 50 of The Planning Act ppy to
any subsequent Con'/r il trai ir-aci:or ir Hie subioot lands:
01. That U app■icant 5 so!lotter orepare 10 submit a copy of tf proposed conveyance for the
pa rr, severed. for review by 1 tvTrinicipatily,
4. Tli ry. the applicants soticitor er.o\ricte an undertaking that He severed tands and the lands to be
enhanced will meroo 111 title:
5. That The condition:7, of consent imposed 1,,y the Committee ho fulfitted wihin one year from thR
date of the gtvinq of the notice.
I hoc purpose of Consent application 2010-B-27 is - .a consi.der a boundary adjustment. The subjoct
1and is Part o Lei 12, Concession 1. Pans 1. 2, and :3, and it w occupies an Pirea
approxinlately 41.6 hectare 102 83 acres). has frontade Ori Line 14 Not of approxrrhateiy 405.6
metres 11,5',?/..tr, foot;, and a depth of appro 6:19.3 metres (2,0228.6 feet). The lands propose°
to lo- conveyed have frontage on Lino 1/1 North of approximately 108_7 metres 1356.6 occupy
Meeting Date. September 16, 2010
Application No. 2010-B-27 Page 1 of 7
Page 95 of 134
an area Of aophox 1 hectaros (17.8 i and do not presen:iy cent;- any On' Iffrigs or
ucwies. 11 nds to be oI iriel would 1 frontage, on Line 14 North of approxithatcly 2;5'6.9
inelres (1,170.9 fectl). (occupy Elh, area of aporttximately ;34.5 nectams Eicres). and presently
contain a ciwell'ng ant; a barn. No new rihildind lots are propcF,ed lo 1 erc.,..atoci as a iesult of the
oroposeibouriclary tJJLIsrr
ANALY
I FINANCIAL:
Not ,- ipplicable.
I POLICIES/LEGISLATION:
Township Official Plan
5e) - 2010-B-27 - Harvie Peter Johnstone, ...
Therefore!. a5 the proposed boundary adjustment no': result in the creation of a riew tut, nor
doos it propose io modify ihe LtA.: of tile pnictofs nflocteal, the proposed boundary adjustment is
considered to comform 1 The intent (If the the Township's Official Plan.
Development Services Meeting Dale September 15 2010
Application No.. 201043-27 Page 2 of
Page 96 of 134
The purpose of applicaiian 2010-13-27 is to pernii loi i-tdclitiochboundary .strnont. No
budding fot h3propor,od to t)o orc.:tted P.r; fl'' I of thr:. lot addition.
The SIJOjel:t larld5 t7fe.Sighilt6:;1 Restrict/xi Rum/ 1 the OVA1Ship's Officia: Plan, and tile are: also
located 1 thir::. Oro .Vcrai(R..7.1- Atoo
Pl..115 le Scction C6.1 of the Official Plan, the objeCtiVeS of IIi o Rest/infect' Rural designat:om aro tC
CiiSCCUr;-.icio scattorod development arid 10 prevent Incompatible development in the re;.1 surrount
Barrio ard OrTia. to mainian and ph thk rural characTer of lh area t.y.,/ clu defining tile_
tirbon bow of E3arrie and Ohliia. Scction C6.2 of the Official S;ati that th0 USE
of Dirt wf thin this designation shad be : that srigle detached aric.1 other uses
also permitted. With respect 10 the severance of land Sectitir C( '3 if the Official Plan deals
with “Tho creation of ite lots for res'dont'ai purposes'', and statos that thc "orteation of riE-w in filling
in
1110 desghat:on is not permitted" howev(_ r. the proposed severance and subsequent lot
acicittior , ivouid not resuh In the e'eatIon of a new lot Section 12.2.2 of tne Plar•. - Bow ic.fLiry
Adjustments", , ..vouitl ai,30/ to such a propas 11 vli oli shtles :As foliov,rs:
A cc, 501 may be permitted for 111C2 pUrpose of modifying lot hoitridaries, p: no rev,:
building lot is created. 11 re,vie.wing ith application for sucli a betindary aLf the
Committee Of Adi shall be sat'stiffi that - he boundary ac.ijusimeht WiH not affed tne
viability of the its, f the properties affected is ntended by this Plan. In iftddition.. the Conirnitiee
of Acijustmeir. shali 511i01iet:1 that the boundary . :11 - iittsimeril wid not affect the viabdity of the
(1)0 10)7 parcels at:cc:tel.'
County Official Plan
The arbjeci lands are cieSta iirated Rural 3 the 'Country* of Sirricrroo's
Secilior ;),.6.6 ct tho Courit!,is Official Plan stair s that "Nev.( kits fp! agricultural osos stiould genora'iy
ficd IOSS iliac 35 llecii-ues cr Oh? oriolool siirvey lot sla? 1 ,1/171C13eVe 1 lesser, or 4 iiii&rirjrritiries
rc Sei 0 /Se d L Sper'ki?ty
Section 3 the County Official Plan. (5enorai biocijv iii and 1.)eveiopmen1 Policies",
however. states that liCotirsii,"His for Ehe purpost3 of boundary col isoliu'r loroi of /and
3,r0 03 oi2l1103 bLit :V1:1 001 ho Tor the pLirp0:30 of cr.... tie!) new lots e.voept ,dfherWIS■-.?
permlifed 0 thiS Plan. Ail loi's c(oe shall d;.);ifOiri? 10 $p/J(/Ca .'nrirbCirli polcies Od
Further. thin Planning Department tit thc Cicunty 71 Siincoc has rirdvised that it has I11 3o10 :11001. with
respitt.el to this application.
\Atilt.? a nova lot s not being created, the proposed boundary adjustment 0/11 lo result in the
cull:a:gement of an extr.3ting parce. from apprOxiMately fleCtareS (160 acros) to approxithatoly
1:3 hectares (1 17.61 - .1cresii . anti the reduction of a 11 6 tleCtale 002.83 acre) parcel, to 3.1.5
hec.ares (35.2 ritcres). Therefore, ihe V rI Iii ly u o lands to lre enhanced throtign thc proposed
conveyrance. for agricultural purposes will be enhanced. and the :rids propose(' lc he retained rwirll
ccritinurr.} to Je of a sufficient size to he viable for agricultural eurposer.;.
On this basis, the proposed COIISCrIt 'a7pear5 C[313 1/ ('319 cm to the policies of the County of
Sin Official Plan.
Provincial Policy Statement
5e) - 2010-B-27 - Harvie Peter Johnstone, ...
Section 3 .3.4 of the Provincia -() C btr. rflc ni 2005. ot Creation Grind Lot ActjuStrir onts". ifitates
inal 110] 01 311 31/1e Hyrfculitual disiGourrageO and may 0011; 0 permitted for: ait
usittri. provided that tho lots , of a /7 ('3' approprirAte for t0 e. type of arAnculturtil 00 191
C19 '110311 ir the area and ry.irfl . sufficiently large lc mainlain l'extility for fultiri.7. iptianctos in dle type of
aoricullural opc.4ation0 :.
Sot or r)1 the i'roviricial PL cy Staten tent, stales that - I„of iridiustnitenfr3 1 pri1.
agriCe/iLirfli are ,71,5 I1 perniatted for !i'3/ ori arid [lie Provincial PolioN
°1( de teoliniodi reosoos" E)s "severances 'or purposes such as ... minor
botindary adjUSIrrIrsrits. which do net iei..s in 131' creation of new lot."
As stared abovu . the pier:resod bouri:Iwy ridjustmclit viii()uld rot result in the creaiiintio of a now lot, and
tncis 13 ho reiainod 3/0 01 have an area 01 approximately 24 0 hectares (85.22 aciiest. and the
iands to he enhanced would have ari area of appriryximately 47.13 hectares ( acres
herefOre ale Viability of the lanes to :lie enhanced through roe proposed conveyancift, for adricultura:
purposes, will Pe enhanced. and the lands proposeci 'rt.: retainen will continue to be of a sufficiert
size to be vial**. for riiigricoltir rai purposes.
(Dri thio. Pitts's, thcri proposed consent nfieets the intent of the Provincial Policy Statement. 2005.
Development Services Meeting Date September 16, 2010
Application No 2010-B-27 Page 3 of . 7
Page 97 of 134
Zoning 8v-Law .
st...13iect property is ; /NciiieLikiraiffRhiint (AIRU) .7onc 1 the foi,ivniship's Zoning ri.iy-1
the lauds enhanced are ?one. ,Lr■..cirieJlturaltriural M-,111c11 Zone ald Ciwiroilrueulai Pre:cc:ion
Ile preposcd i..imuddary acijustrnent :'s It in flit hi lands hocuovilic
aiir.N.-1 Ewproxiiinalely 47.13 (117.61 acres), and tfild rhtaincri ;anus OCE,i'ipv an aiioH of
Fipiiroxirn frt? 54.5 i r85.27 Tioh t1 0 onhancecl and true retainer" I'ids would Curioly
tI' provisions of Lie Zoning 13y- Lii reftbed :c required lot frociacr,i; 'or sidule
detached dificilinius on land5 the. of 4:5 ineHir..:is. to in lot sizhs for
varicus rtflSCIJ ti» I L15.5.7:: betweon 2.0 and 4.0 neehares, hwelliiigs on lo.tsi
tile 0.4- hectares.
Further. a sit:: inspectfon revealcrJ that the ' 1 lLfl rogil red setback frorn the interior .cide lot ilPC *to
the solutlit of 1 1115C [Hi ids, for exis:ring Ihuil.Cinrcs and structures on tlic lands to be retatnii,:d..
not appear to ti;c acivrhiisoly ...;:ittectod by I u popssoI I;oundiary i sil .
CONSULTATIONS:
ATTACHMENTS:
Schedule Location Nilap
Sr tile #2.. Context Ni , p
Schedule -43- ApplicHtion Drawing
CONCLUSION:
fle,soectfuily
Al VJib
F rier
Development Services
blic Works Debar hi-
is Departirient Proposal apuhuis 1.0 meet !Hifilf!
Engineering Deportmen! —
Lake :Imbue Region Conse•vatior rAuthority-
5e) - 2010-B-27 - Harvie Peter Johnstone, ...
On this basis. tric.; appliii, is considered to cornpiy the provisions of the Zoniric By-Law.,
it Cue opr on of Ihe that Consent applicatfon 2010-8-27. for bounciahy
Hrilustinent, would appear V) cenforrn to the. general inter): cif :he Official Plans of the Teii.ivri.shib anc
C.;ctinly of Stmcoe.. '15 tine Provincral Policy Stateirient and viiould appear to colinti.4
th e general intent of the TchAinsliipis Zoning By-Law.
He \,l J(' hy:
Gliinn
1 P RP
Malagor Plarmnu Servichs
Meeting Date September 16, 2010
Application No 2010-6-27 Page 1 of 7
Page 98 of 134
!I,
!!„1:5,!1. ;IT: F • _ 7.! "•-•
Development Services
Application Nu, 2010-6-27
PI-?.n
" *-
I
me te s
SCHEDULE. 1 LOCATION 1■/LAP
C20 10-E3-27 johnstenc:. 1-in rvic)
1
5e) - 2010-B-27 - Harvie Peter Johnstone, ...
;;;;;! 7 • .4;44
•
Meeting Date September 16, 7010
Page 5 of 7
Page 99 of 134
xxi /
• • OL D. E OAFEr c
•
0 I R0 RIAEI 500
i
Development Services
Application No 2010-B-27
rvieirs
SC.;1-1DUI F CON MAP
(2010-0-27 Johnstonc. Ayers. 1-1
PROPOSED ANDS TO DE 1R.E TA I N
...- ,.
f
: PR(....q i A RDE TO BE ENI / R E
•
l i
(...) 0-00:(..)NV
5e) - 2010-B-27 - Harvie Peter Johnstone, ...
NE'
Meeling Date September 16, 261U
Paye 5 of 7
IT7
•-••••• •• • •=--- INT
Page 100 of 134
22 at 5
Development Services
Application No. 2010-6-27
• .
2o 1930 or WIftr
as 22 triad atm.
!:1:1(311EDULE 3: APPLICATION DRAVVING
(2(11C-B-27 JohIsLIce. Aprs,
3,3,32,2 — oro2222t.tooto — atoot titt ttit 1)
2 .te 2.2?...¶ serf
•;r ).
_ .k••-••th .1 1 -
5e) - 2010-B-27 - Harvie Peter Johnstone, ...
•
SS s
Ett72r12 rtZ , C2 12
t
Se g wee e.r Woreitaven 2 oft tot 2.2
len,
t ,
„ - , 11-2-•-
t e, re1
fivr., 1 1.P-Temt - , - ,-_,c 2tra
1.1.,,tpt Jr2;wt,trr.,
12 0.7 . 42 - 2 - [rty2trrq
.51 ttrt2 S
itri t221222te etTA-tte
02 bartn42*
t3 , 22
„ • .. 222 . .
con20- flotz imoloolp f. tonoto
•
rot.,..22)22,73E0fittatta Ares•s de „Teeters Norrota ffortor _
.ttond Mlro-poont ..2oratr._ Poreofated 1,2k 23 139I
° f onotooto to Venom game f.Otoo nrce
122tortss ono sofa lot TS
not IL Ortlintl noolt 0,20 . 2.0 at
Rretep gruth 0011 atte If
I 2 22.2123 222 4,-12 Sdlter drettrp native
twoo not rolh lot
tir P
st-2,2-tt011 k Mon-.y kod Nara .
qz11 txf 1517.
11 3 1 2 . ..ktitmtlool trocch017d Lo
Doc of
ttat rbt nr rt. lot con224 tel btt
&-22,221 ug2 Mau eh-
Mont.! Med .2.29,1911V.
Ifctrxt Itu Inkormool Parrrrur c
f
2 2tte relax
Till; arta I 21)eint2 tonthroll iloornt 1.5....15.alw
Frrtm g boot 19;5 trtron.IGTI.W. bi214.L01 rt.
OrWcal hotter IX to 115 */-2, tetrt-t11,1
1 12 2 ,rrtly flelert---notliAnn r,v I 22l.
i JO
!Meeting Date September 1 7010
Page, 7 of 7
Page 101 of 134
From: Farquharson, Steven
To: Wiebe Alan
Subject: FW: C of A Applications for September
Date: September-03-10 10:23:16 AM
Steven Farquharson
Intermediate Planner
Township of Oro-Medonte
o jo ro ctsbel wnship t yi ec k hrite
Prima' kfcrilage. Exchlrig Flaw,
P:(705)487-2171
F: (705) 487-0133
148 Line 7s, Box 100
Oro, Ontario !CIL 2X0
wwworo-rnedontexa
From: Hamelin, Rachelle [mailto:Rachelle.Hamelin@simcoe.ca]
Sent: Friday, September 03, 2010 10:05 AM
To: Farquharson, Steven
Subject: RE: C of A Applications for September
5e) - 2010-B-27 - Harvie Peter Johnstone, ...
TH:ot r7f
Yft...: ri:tttittiftt 1 iritOlitttli dtt t* Sit.tittt ttti. tttt ritt.
From: Farquharson, Steven [mailto:sfarquharson@oro-medonte.ca]
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 3:31 PM
To: Hamelin, Rachelle
Page 102 of 134
Cc: Wiebe, Alan
Subject: C of A Applications for September
Rachelle,
Can you please provide comments on the attached applications for Consent submitted to the
Township. I will be on vacation next week, so if you have any questions please forward them the
Alan or Glenn.
Steven Farquharson
Intermediate Planner
Township of Oro - Medonte
P kfcrilage. Exchlrig .Fxru.r
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner(l 1, and is
believed to be clean.
5e) - 2010 -B -27 - Harvie Peter Johnstone, ...
P:1705)487-2171
F: (705) 487.0133
148 Line 7s, Box 100
Oro,, Ontario !QL 2X0
www.oro- rnedortte a
Page 103 of 134
co
a)
C
O
C
O
N
N
O
0
N
Q�
5e) - 2010 -B -27 - Harvie Peter Johnstone, ...
U)
0
Page 104 of 134
0
0
0
N,S[3\111
L
5e) - 2010-B-27 - Harvie Peter Johnstone, ...
Z z
<
I- I Z
W Z 0
uJo
Ujuiw
0 0 0
I- H
U) (1)
000
Z Z Z
< < <
000
W W
0 0 0
-0_0 0 aa
000
cr cr
a. a. a.
0
0
Page 105 of 134
2010-B-27 (Johnstone, Ayers, Harvie)
I RE S IN L ° C-• • N Lt.%
1 ARVIE . NST 4A
O
INTEREST I LOT 121w 117! HELO
ttY EDNA AvERS, NORMA HARV1E ANC)
FIC3/4RET .41
•
T 1.
I ANC)
MAitGA
fitaFt
° • ,•, nii••at r ° °
1 eV ZION't)Neteet: 11,10 tiNate.4...iet the
ite■ Writ 1,01 t A yet Thby
:at
>47 >1
:.ST.ELF.0 IN FART 12 f..VV '112i HELD
ANO
IICII)GLAS -OHNSIONE
A UNA
A P.4
t 11
7.1)(:t lei;eVkillrl;:/1.....,5 r1 5I,,Dr rtt
949 r t 11 a V 0 . t.t . tf:h
I„ho r.:•I E1 Ayti.•
N H,AtV,0 nd
co
1
vi'
^ L
W
>%
a
co'
C
0
+a
0
C
_c
0
..,
.......
N
N
(II
th
‘-i
0
N
5e) - 2010 -B -27 - Harvie Peter Johnstone, ...
Page 107 of 134
2010-B-27 (Johnstone, Ayers, Harvie)
.4.414a aanat
naertir atasca
.,....amadaY • +
lagatte a Sae' s any 'SUSS. aStianits
4,06 aro. asStOSSsas a 4,9,.. attrassasaass A, ass t Sawa saes 4...• C, LA, ;
14.1
Sass.. •sf rasseasstlas nat sets
sssaa
ass s sse 4,4 r
4„ .....rawara ametav a ast.Ortsmenfpr amp
a 1.30aleaVtannnowft •*abn, aSsases
SS *cry anamatat .410. taakka
atate It me ca. aaa 0 "'at
4 . 4 3 , 44.4 .- du. bosernat *taw
sass.. sr vs snag" Sasses sas Ss( SA
sty att faaantel oat .4. saj0.4ars F fl,,
toad 044, ..0avamre tear a,,,,, a.% *S44,0 a 3 a .0
g% a araast.,4044* aita a 'fla Saas s
flataiftartcs rpr4.,44. a. ts -
tlermartowtem Carman& aSettamtegas •■ttemiacemp sase,a4ate.
4.444.4 mew., ravaull *S44 *4 a Sam
• aParteaataarmaxa, Tam talaati taaer
sec. 4.00:44 be 44 a','.-, 4O4 Sialaetairm -404aotzarsatex4ataa.
HU VA t 4aVtao,
potteratalannemall Carts 1 4
• 00 *V( VW
• *Stew. 44tar casatatva4ar...44nor est :ca.... kat 44,
4.44 ....so 4141.4
49*4* 0Taaa, o a, .aaaat
• wateran aucat 444 oar. a. teatalt
saf Weata. .05ats. var.
.■■ t_a
,
atAst • mad miatiew tactaaaat #44 bairtn•amat sax la watt 42, a a:-
. • ',ova "aa 4 a •40 ata ar. %W. aottata Startrarsogat,
a 44-.tetssal Yaw "woe. ..04a13 4 93 4 taa0 § a a A* 44 ,4, a-aa aa,
— aaAt star-ratia, asseasars assessaa aS■
.a9 at • •••••• Ca„,.Sa
2010 -B -27 (Johnstone, Ayers, Harvie)
2010 -B -27 (Johnstone, Ayers, Harvie)
Existing dwelling on lands to be retained
............. •
2010 -B -27 (Johnstone, Ayers, Harvie)
Proposed lands to be retained
2010 -B -27 (Johnstone, Ayers, Harvie)
Existing buildings on lands to be retained
2010 -B -27 (Johnstone, Ayers, Harvie)
Proposed lands to be retained
;::. u n ask
2010 -B -27 (Johnstone, Ayers, Harvie)
Proposed lands to be retained
ffas
...:.::...
2010 -B -27 (Johnstone, Ayers, Harvie)
Proposed boundary of severance
• • • •
ree I ie
Application No:
2010-a-26
Meeting Date:
September 16, 2010
Roll #:
4348-010-008-09434
5f) - 2010-B-26 - UCCI Consolidation Compa...
TOWNSHIP OF OR0-114EDONTE
REPORT
To: Committee of Adjustment
Subject: Consent Application
UCCI Consolidated Companies Inc.
Lot 27, Plan M-187
(Lot 23 Concession 5)
Winfield Drive West
(Former Township of Oro)
Prepared Fly:
Steven Farquharson,
Intermediate Planner
Motion
R.M.S. File tt:
D10 40839
REQUIRED CONDITIONS:
In reference to the Conch isinn section of this report, staff recommend that Application 22 1043 -26 be
deferred, however should the Committee coerce to approve ApplicatIon 2010-13-26, the fol'ovi.ring
cdrididons arc.; redtiirocl to be irripc.)-sed en the Committee's decision:
1. That three copies of a Deference Plan for the subject Hid indicating the severed parcel b
prepared by an Ontario Land Surveyor he slibinitted to the Secretar . -1 . reasurer:
2. 'That The severed lands be merged in :itiC vidth CON 5 FT LOTS 26 28 and that toe provisions
of Subsection '3 or of Section 30 of The. Planning Act apply to any sthcsogJerit conveyance or
Ira; teiior nr 0.;olviny the subject lands;
.3. That the applicant's 5oUcjor prepare and sue 111 a copy of the probosed conveyance for the
parcel severed, for review by the Municipality;
4. That the applicants solicitor provide en undertaking that the severed lands arid the lands 10 be
enhanced vs I merge in - title;
5. That 4IO beIid!ttOrhS Of consent imposed by the Comindtee. he Unfilled Minh) one year front lhe
date of the giving of the notice.
BACKGROUND:
Tine a eplicant ns onepos ng a boundary adjustment to convey approximately 0.10 heota r OS (0.21
acres) tram the subject property 42 Wrifielci Drive West, In the nelehneuriro of to the north. fhe
proposed ietairied lot, would c0f1SiSi of approximately 1.0 hectares (2.6 acres). and currently vacant.
No new budding lots are proposed to be created as a result of the iot at:10Tel).
ANALYSIS:
Development Services
Application No. 2010-0-26
Meeting Date: Septeinher 16, 2010
Page 1 of 7
Page 116 of 134
The purpose ofi application 2O 1O-B-25 is to 3i ri i boun( b,ry adjustment. He sot lb..CA land being 42
Winfield Dr lye West, - .0 convey Ihri having an area of approximately 0.10 hectares (0.2 acres) to be
added to line adjacent land to the no•In 3*.....TIOCI by the applicant The hoonciary isidjustment
piovido a metire v./icle access to the abuttind lands to the north front Winfiekii Drive, No nevi/ bulkiihrig
if are proposed to 0 created CO r OSii I ul Mb io: addition.
FINANCIAL;
his appliccihie
[POLICIES/LEGISLATION:
Offici.:11PIan
Tile subject iitnds arr: designated Shoreline by the Official Plan (OP) Section D2 of the OP contalns
policies with respect to suhdivis on of Specifically, Section D2.2.2 -i ridary Adjustments',
provides Ole following guidi-7.ince Couscol ApplicEttions in general:
COeSerii 4'77,* p:-..-Vrnitteri for The p±.710 of rtiociii yin Jot 1,10Drlf.jahre.9. 0f0y0lied 00 S( i)oildim...7 ;0!
IS croi-u'ecf... The Committee of A clios!rneot oh-2< IN 6. ,.. y.fisfieci ti the. bow 3daril ediUSteleHt Wi/j
affeCt The 1 /13e. 1 .0 1 / (he use of the croperUcs :
respect to the appication 0 hand, no itew building lots nre proposed ao,d it is ii ii anticii tnat
the proposed i)duiRliiiry adjustment woibld aftsiot the viatillitv of the use at Inc properly, Thc subject
or eurrently vacant. The proposed land that is I conveyed is to provide access to 111C
e111 from Winfield Drive. As suen, tht- proposed eciunchry adjustment is generally
keeping with tho intent of lho policies stated in I k. Official Elan, and othervinso conforms, the
'a(iji..istment policies contained in Sector
Zortind liy-law
Tho schjout property is currently zonod Riri Rosidoritiiiil Ono LCLU o j l HUI-i 4) Zone ii he
ownship's Zoning By-liqw. Ourr.,sintly the suhjecothinds and the lands to bc onnancf- are vac.iiiint. The
lot to be ertht is zoned Pr <i vi Heii:reational Exception I told', (PH Residential Cho
Exception: 173 1-toild (R1 — 173(H)). ilrK! Eni Protecilion Exception 172 Hold (PR'172(H))
Zones. The enhanced lands have been approved for a rivixiniinm of bet:lc:her! Ci0fl 1110 % ti
ail iiitssociated golf course. *vVith the tiands to tic. eonvoyed tho enhanced lot, the retained lands
v,rould remajr, I 00 W tile minimum required liontage and lot <1 iequileiner its of no
RIM I '84 of the Zoning By-lavv.
Therefore. the woi I comply \ivith the pros si is as ui by he Zoning B, ac
Provincial Policy Stateinehl
The intort of the PIOVil ci,i PCIICy Statoincill IPPSt is to build stung and healthy communities while
at iine siAffie tbno prdrnofino eifficient land urn i lid development patte(] IS.
eevelopmeni Services
5f) - 2010-B-26 - UCCI Consolidation Compa...
Meeting Date: September 16. 2010
App1ica0on No 2010-B-25 Page 2 of 7
Page 117 of 134
Po[c' 1.1.1 u) that mmoohoQoKiciaoidamy|oi:.fn.eni and land Jou u:(i�/nu
which sustain ;he financial well hei:; of the Pn)vin:e and munioipnNiex :)ye/ dle long tn1 .4|so
found hn suhssctioo II SiciHS . 01' am:no appropriate range 'and mix ofresidential,
o/np|npnmnt(|ncludi'/g industrial, cummercia| and industrial Ls*sl recreational a:oopen sfpa:ouues
ioo`ee‘. long k+'m needs. Thcpron000d.5nvnrooce |ncntc) n//tvidurfv�u1Mnmcoirma.hosovo.
meeio Section |] and is conside/ud to be coosistcn< vi/ist|' the Provincial Po'icy StaiexenL.
Tne app lest Ueeo reviewed v.„ reference to the Place to Grow policies Ma: huve heez in
p|aue since 20CG. In Policy 2.2.2- Managind Growth (|o encourages cities and towns to develop ao
cmnp'*Ks cnmmLoikesmid' a divuoa mix Of land usaa. a /ah:ye ahid .nix of emp|oymeotand houoioy
|ypes. high quality public open souoearu easy a() local u|u/ooDad AJuo found ir
Policy 2.2.2,'Gcnesz| intensification Section 6(f)i, which slates iha1 aU munioipr|iheo will develop and
impkmaniMruugk their Official Plans a dr/kzgynrd pn'ioies to p|nse in and achieve intensification.
Subsection (i) uta|ds ',hat Ne will plan for range and mix cf housing. In Po'icy21S
Rural Amas, them are F/ovisiooS |h allow Jr | ^osiUeobc| development occu/ouiside ,[oot||ermui
axsauio site specific locations with approved designa)ox hi .1 p1 os to Ii'. aLlti'1q .I1(J 10 'P e
north (Ts! enhanced Iandsh
The Township's Official Plan a:fret sentains policies wh:ch permit staff and the Committee to
consider a.pp|icu&on b.runmen| in the Shoreline Designation u/ovidon ti/x1 The proposed |oi /neeiing
the policies of D7.22. Dee to meeting the required policies of UvsTnwnsUin Official
f-flan |o/ boundary mdiun|nmn!n. the application |s considered tn meet, this policy.
0emsd or the above. 1hc Conoon1 upo|icodonv«ou!d goouu\1yconhoxn with the P|oco to Crow
Cnuntvo'SimconOhda|Plan
In analyzing this Conser| application. |ownskip staff reviewed flip County of 3xnccm Official Plan.
The Cuu u Simcu* hao coxxnankad U/ai ihey have no ohjadion k) ihe p/00ozed boonCa/y
u0jushma/it It is the npininr rd the Planning Department Um: the proposed *zoseotcoufnono in the
policies of the Cot,nty c! Sioicoo O[fidn| Hoc
[
Trenspnriatinn and Environmental Sepioes-
�uiNiny Copxrhnonf-
Eig|neerinyDepcomcot—
Loko 3imnoo Region Coosep/atonAuthority-
ATTACHMENTS:
Schedule 41- LooaUonMup
Schedule Co�1ex]Map
CONCLUSION:
Development Srmicer Meeting Date: September m.zo10
Page xu[7
Application No. ucnva-co
5f)-2010-B-26-UCCI Consolidation Compa...
Page 118 of 134
It IS ilIC 001Ilicin of the Planning Depw thitt Consent , :t.pplicntion 201043-26 . for a botindary
ad;estment wouid 1L 00' te conform te the genera! intent 0! the Ott Han. Ar-1(1 maintains the use
arid setlyack provisions et Ihe Zoning F3y- lv oov '. 5 riclear of the fir ai foal uSr;
tI rmlrc. wiee 0 0 the •ands the. n(:)rth. The 1:- to the north rim i nattiml
erWIFOrIlriental arca separating a proposed res:cioiliial condornintuiin altd rekttc!-O golf COUrSe frerfl the
roistitic. lots on the north side of VVindlicid Orivo. The app icant s SC 1)51 a Site Plan
app•iottion tor :110 uroposi....d condoininiUM and golf courso I1.01 rOCCIVCd :-.ipprOW1; 'r on
Council. Tile site plan U aO MJS le n5 . sho any detail of init. oloposed acc(...ss connecting to a traj
system throcon the environme 1tea.. 5tsh e:Attest Mat Application 2h1O-E-26 L deferred until
11 Er, .iS inforinalion has beer' pnie■Aded lc) staff claiifying the r , lIar Ut ltriu access to it
connort 70 . for '.(..1 pktposit is the nccoss and Pitt: .telation to rho pfoodso(! development to Into
north.
.,t.g)CCt11..111V
Cittnn MCiP, RFT
rviattager or. Planning Sonitoc.
5f) - 2010-B-26 - UCCI Consolidation Compa...
Development Services Meeting Date: September 1 Ei, 2010
ApiJlication No 2010-E3-26 Page 4 of 7
Page 119 of 134
Development Services
Application No. 2010-B-26
5f) - 2010-B-26 - UCCI Consolidation Compa...
7„leetiny Date: September 16, 201 0
Page 5 of 7
Page 120 of 134
LU
•
.`• • 1:".: f: I
5f) - 2010-B-26 - UCCI Consolidation Compa...
SCHEDULE I: LoaraioN mAp
2p10-3-26 (UCC1',
2 ; l,;17., ROID
•
''••• . i - .Th 'i • jtVj
l I
- r• 1
. J.
I !
':, Vv Cji 1 , , i
LAIJf••,.1. R' Ei
*I I i ; li :a• .. ' *--. •
, ,,.... .11 I !„ J •
J
Development Services Meetjog Date: September 16, 2010
Application No, 2016-E3-26
Page b of 7
Page 121 of 134
. LI ., e1C...•••i•" , .1f . .7.•
SCHEDULE. 2: CONTEXT MAP
20 I 0 2 UCCI
4
I --
5f) - 2010-B-26 - UCCI Consolidation Compa...
■■■
It '
Ow Ego ■■■■■■■■■■=5. Re.■
Development Services Meeting Date: September 16. 2010
Application No. 2010-B-26 Page 7 of 7
Page 122 of 134
0
5f) - 2010-B-26 - UCCI Consolidation Compa...
6
S
Page 123 of 134
o -
0 -
V.
‘ r•rf
Ir I
'
I L . vii...LN L:7,i NCL - 5!.. -- :101\15.5 iv 13 v
I 0 , —,,..,,, r , p.n., MI. .... ■k ...i V ..7 .NPIN,ITA Eel 1. , '' VI, •r-, Ea, n0:I en, 1.3 *ma •. raril we r r r
r
Ii
I'
1 ;
• • • r .;"
*5'
;
rr: "r•: - I
•
' 1
• • I
I .•
•r• r
rrts r.ro
•
tilt.t.• •
„r •
• ,.. tt't
••
,
5f) - 2010-B-26 - UCCI Consolidation Compa...
•
(Tr
(11
'
Page 124 of 134
I7C I. JO 9Z I. abed
05 , 72 2E5. ,
'man. set =VS IIIVAMOWS0 1M WO 'rn#
r ,
z
lap usa
21 22
I••
taX
6 g
- ,4
4
LOT SUMMARY
LOT AREA (ha.) FRONTAGE (m.) LOT AREA ( ha.) FRONTAGE (m.)
1 a 1-16 37-4 21 0-91 61-0
2 0 68 46-5 22 1.00 63-0
3 0-59 1 1 4 23 1 09 71 5
44 0-58 36-6 24 1.08 67 8
5 4 0.61 37-0 25 1-14 78-0
5 0.63 51 1 26 1-03 74-7
7 * 0-80 42-8 27 1-10 85-3
8 A 0.65 41.0 28 0-97 68-6
9 't 0-57 34-9 29 1-00 77-7
10 0-57 35-7 30 0 98 74-7
II 0-58 36-4 37 0.71 30-7
12 0-29 3 I 2 38 0-86 30-7
13 0-95 97-5
14 1.04 93.0 WATER FRONT
15 094 83-8
16 0-87 76-8
20 0 96 52-2
— edwoo uowpiosuoD non - 9Z - (19
PART OF LOT 27 AND BROKEN
TOWNSHIP OF Of
COUNTY OF SIM(
WiN
LCS
7
1 ,1 11 II:
;
:47:1
SF
roik
I I
•
•
Nil ,fte 1
S//pf 6
• 4,
5f) - 2010-B-26 - UCCI Consolidation Compa...
1
Page 126 of 134
5f) - 2010 -B -26 - UCCI Consolidation Compa...
trAwAsho
■
Page 127 of 134
•1
5f) - 2010-B-26 - UCCI Consolidation Compa...
r
Page 128 of 134
5f) - 2010-B-26 - UCCI Consolidation Compa...
Page 129 of 134
5f) - 2010 -B -26 - UCCI Consolidation Compa...
Page 130 of 134
5f) - 2010 -B -26 - UCCI Consolidation Compa...
Page 131 of 134
5f) - 2010 -B -26 - UCCI Consolidation Compa...
Page 132 of 134
5f) - 2010 -B -26 - UCCI Consolidation Compa...
Page 133 of 134
5f) - 2010-B-26 - UCCI Consolidation Compa...
Page 134 of 134