Loading...
05 25 2009 PAC AgendaPage TOWNSHIP OF ORO- MEDONTE PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 7 COUNCIL CHAMBERS Township o� Proud Heritage, Exciting Futsre DATE: MONDAY, MAY 25, 2009 TIME: 7:00 P.M. 1. OPENING OF THE MEETING BY THE CHAIR 2. ADOPTION OF AGENDA Motion for Adoption 3. DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST AND THE GENERAL NATURE THEREOF: - "IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ACT" 4. MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING 3 -6 a) Minutes of Planning Advisory Committee, meeting held on April 27, 2009. 5. PRESENTATIONS: 7 -21 a) Berardo Mascioli, Principal, Stratega Consulting Ltd., Proposed Lake Simcoe Aeropark, Industrial /Business Park, West Half of Lot 18 and West Half of Lot 19, Concession 8 (Oro), Township of Oro - Medonte. 6. PUBLIC MEETINGS: None. 7. PLANNING APPLICATIONS: 22 -33 a) Report No. DS 2009 -27, Glenn White, Manager of Planning Services, re: Hillway Equipment Ltd. 2009 - ZBA -02, Part of Lots 8 & 9, Concession 12, Part of Lot 9, Concession 13, Township of Oro - Medonte (Former Township of Oro). 34 -42 b) Report No. DS 2009 -28, Proposed Zoning By -law Amendment Application 2009 - ZBA -06, Ferris, 77 Line 12 North, Part of the West Half of Lot 19, Concession 13 (Oro), Township of Oro - Medonte 43 -48 c) Planning Application Status Report, May, 2009. 8. CORRESPONDENCE AND COMMUNICATION: 49 -65 a) Tom Kurtz, correspondece dated May 20, 2009 and correspondence dated May 21, 2009 from Linda Babulic re: May 25, 2009 PAC Agenda Comments Page 1 of 87 Page 8. CORRESPONDENCE AND COMMUNICATION: 66 -87 b) Mayor H.S. Hughes, Correspondence dated April 24, 2009 from Denis Kelly, The Regional Municipality of York re: The Proposed Lake Simcoe Protection Plan [Addenda] 9. OTHER BUSINESS / EDUCATION: a) Tom Kurtz, re: Source Water Protection Committee Update. b) Andria Leigh, Director of Development Services, re: 2009 Summer Meeting Schedule. 10. ADJOURNMENT Motion for Adjournment Page 2 of 87 Agenda Item # 4a) - Minutes of Planning Advisory Committee, meeting held on Apri... TOWNSHIP OF ORO- MEDONTE PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE MINUTES 2006 -2010 TERM April 27, 2009, 7:04 p.m. Council Chambers Present: Council Representatives Public Representatives Mayor H.S. Hughes (arrived @ 7:32 p.m.) Linda Babulic Deputy Mayor Ralph Hough Roy Hastings Councillor Terry Allison Tom Kurtz Councillor Mel Coutanche Mary O'Farrell- Bowers Councillor Sandy Agnew Larry Tupling Councillor John Crawford Councillor Dwight Evans Staff Present: Andria Leigh, Director of Development Services; Glenn White, Manager of Planning Services; Steven Farquharson, Intermediate Planner; Janette Teeter, Deputy Clerk Also Present: Dan Amadio, Nick Karakis, Jim Woodford, Duncan Ferris, Doug Ferris, Bill Stonkus, Jerry Young OPENING OF MEETING BY CHAIR. Deputy Mayor Ralph Hough assumed the chair and called the meeting to order. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA. Motion No. PAC090427 -1 Moved by Tom Kurtz, Seconded by Mary O'Farrell- Bowers It is recommended that the agenda for the Planning Advisory Committee meeting of Monday, April 27, 2009 be received and adopted. Carried. DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST AND THE GENERAL NATURE THEREOF: - "IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ACT ". None declared. Page 3 of 87 Agenda Item # 4a) - Minutes of Planning Advisory Committee, meeting held on Apri... 4. MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING— March 30, 2009. Motion No. PAC090427 -2 Moved by Mary O'Farrell- Bowers, Seconded by Linda Babulic It is recommended that the minutes of the Planning Advisory Committee Meeting held on March 30, 2009 be received and adopted. Carried. 5. PRESENTATIONS: None. 6. PUBLIC MEETINGS: a) Proposed Amendment to the Zoning By -Law, 2009 - ZBA -06, Part of Lot 19, Concession 13 (Oro), Township of Oro - Medonte, 77 Line 12 North (Ferris). Deputy Mayor Hough called the public meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. and explained the public meeting has been called under the authority of the Planning Act, Section 34, R.S.O. 1990 c.P.13, to obtain public comment with respect to a proposed Amendment to the Zoning By -law, Application 2009 - ZBA -06 (Ferris), Part of Lot 19, Concession 13, municipally known as 77 Line 12 North, (formerly within the Township of Oro), Township of Oro - Medonte. Notice of the Public Meeting was mailed to landowners within 120m (400 feet) of the specified site on April 7, 2009 and posted on a sign on the subject property on the same date. The following correspondence was received at the meeting: Ministry of Transportation dated April 23, 2009; Simcoe County District School Board dated April 27, 2009. Steve Farquharson, Intermediate Planner, explained the purpose and effect of the Proposed Amendment to the Zoning By -Law. A PowerPoint presentation was presented. The following public members offered verbal comments with respect to the proposed amendment: Doug Ferris. The Deputy Mayor advised that no additional deputations to Council will be permitted with respect to the Proposed Amendment to the Zoning By -Law. A digital recording of the meeting is available for review at the Township Administration Centre, 148 Line 7 South. There being no further comments or questions, the meeting adjourned at 7:15 p.m Planning Advisory Committee Meeting April 27, 2009, Page 2 Page 4 of 87 Agenda Item # 4a) - Minutes of Planning Advisory Committee, meeting held on Apri... 7. PLANNING APPLICATIONS: a) Report No. DS 2009 -026, Steve Farquharson, Intermediate Planner, re: Proposed Redline Revision —Draft Plan 43 -OM- 20001, P- 100/00, Part of North Half and South Half of Lot 3, and Part of Lot 4, Concession 4 (Oro), Township of Oro - Medonte, (Horseshoe Valley Lands). Steve Farquharson, Intermediate Planner, provided an overview. A PowerPoint presentation was presented. Dan Amadio, MHBC Planning, provided comments on behalf of the owner of the application. Nick Karakis, Cole Engineering Group Ltd., provided comments on behalf of the owner of the application. Motion No. PAC090427 -3 Moved by Larry Tupling, Seconded by Roy Hastings It is recommended that 1. Report DS 2009 -026 Re: Proposed Redline Revision to Draft Plan of Subdivision — Horseshoe Valley Lands Ltd. — P- 100/00 - (Adult Lifestyle Community) 43 -OM- 20001, Part of the North Half and South Half of Lot 3, and Part of Lot 4, Concession 4, (Oro), Township of Oro - Medonte, be received for information. 2. That the applicant be requested to revise the redline draft plan to address the comments received from Aecom dated April 16, 2009 and comments from Planning Advisory Committee at their meeting of April 27, 2009. 3. And Further That staff bring forward a subsequent report to the Planning Advisory Committee once the revised redline plan is received and reviewed. Carried. 8. CORRESPONDENCE AND COMMUNICATION: None. 9. OTHER BUSINESS / EDUCATION: a) Tom Kurtz, re: Source Water Protection Committee Update. A PowerPoint presentation was presented. Motion No. PAC090427 -4 Moved by Larry Tupling, Seconded by Roy Hastings It is recommended that the verbal update presented by Tom Kurtz re: Source Water Protection Committee be received. Carried. Planning Advisory Committee Meeting April 27, 2009, Page 3 Page 5 of 87 Agenda Item # 4a) - Minutes of Planning Advisory Committee, meeting held on Apri... b) Andria Leigh, Director of Development Services, re: Report No. DS 2009 -019 re: Township Official Plan Review — Work Plan. The Committee consented to allow Jerry Young to provide comments. Jim Woodford provided a comment. Motion No. PAC090427 -5 Moved by Roy Hastings, Seconded by Larry Tupling It is recommended that 1. Report No. DS 2009 -018, Andria Leigh, Director of Development Services re: Officia Plan Review —Work Plan be received and adopted. 2. That it is recommended to Council that the 2009/2010 Work Plan for the Official Plan review and conformity exercise outlined in Report No. DS 2009 -018 be adopted. 3. And Further That, in accordance with the March 26, 2009 letter from George Smitherman, Minister of Energy and Infrastructure, the Township of Oro - Medonte submit a request for a one year extension until June 2010 to complete the Official Plan review and conformity exercise. 10. ADJOURNMENT Motion No. PAC090427 -6 Moved by Tom Kurtz, Seconded by Mary O'Farrell- Bowers It is recommended that we do now adjourn at 8:29 p.m. Carried. Carried. Chair, Director of Development Services, Deputy Mayor Ralph Hough Andria Leigh Deputy Clerk, Janette Teeter Planning Advisory Committee Meeting April 27, 2009, Page 4 Page 6 of 87 F_ A, IM(_-01F. A2R4r FFAP (C- 01-- TSUL7INC LTD Planning Status Lake Simcoe Aeropark Industrial Sub - Division By Stratega Consulting on behalf of Lake Simcoe Aeropark Inc. May, 2009 Page 7 of 87 LAKE rftA� SMC -0E AER-OPARK -- :-ONE Introduction • Lake Simcoe Aeropark Inc. (LSA) has filed a 77 Lot -212 Acre Subdivision Plan next to Lake Simcoe Regional Airport (LSRA) in Oro - Medonte Township. • Proposal is for a fully serviced Business Park with a mix of lot sizes in keeping with the Township's OP • Servicing will include water, storm water management, sewage, fire hydrant/sprinkler capacity, road ROW of 26 metres for large vehicle access. • Future LSA Tenants will benefit from immediate International Airport Access. Page 8 of 87 LAKE SMC -0E AER-O A Official Plan Designation is Industrial Land Use Context Page 9 of 87 LAKE SMCOE AER-O A ONSULTINGLTDe Application Status • LSA has filed a Plan of Subdivision Application with the following studies: — Traffic by Cole Engineering — Archaeological by Central Archaeological Group — Survey /Draft Plan Layout by CDN Land Surveyors — Environmental Impact by RJ Burnside — Functional Servicing and Stormwater by RJ Burnside — Planning Report and Update by Stratega • This project is now proceeding on a two -phase but still comprehensive approach in regards to the orderly development and servicing of the industrial subdivision. Page 10 of 87 LAKE SMC -0E r- -(:)NSULnNG TD. Conceptual Land Use 29 Area of Business Park Zone Uses °° ,m 00 =9m 798 a. 286.9] .. 1-- Approximately 38 Acres _ 2-. m Assume 50% Coverage i,.66gwmi Area of Light Industrial Zone Uses ­0 11 ~- I I I I II I Approximately 93 Acres I - 26.°°m � Assume 50% Coverage - - -_ , °a s,- �.mt--- - - - - -- - - - - - -- i --------- - - - - -- t-- - - - - -- Area of Warehouse Zone Uses i- ------ I - Approximately 54 Acres °m -- I Assume 60% Coverage E __ ' 624600 ;6. m Lake Simcoe -- - - - - -- Fast Fact: '�A9'ort' 6 - - - - - -- Based on 50% Coverage a Total of �w« : - -- Mm °a m 4 Million square feet of buildable space is permitted in the Official Plate -. -m I r II I T Phase 2 Phase 1 40 Page 11 of 87 LAKE SMCOE AER-O A _, ONSULTINGLTD. Aerial View Aa Confidential & Privileged Lake Simcoe Aeropark Development (Phase 1) Page 12 of 87 LAKE SMCOE AER-O A -- ONE Development Phasing As reports were completed, it was determined that there are conflicting regulations and guidelines between Transport Canada and the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority in regards to Airport operational safety and land usage that need to be addressed. The proposed development has now been divided into two phases, Phase 1 being the West Half of Lot 19, Concession 8 and Phase 2 being the West Half of Lot 18, Concession 8 (where the land usage conflict is found) to permit the additional studies and consultation required to resolve this conflict in the Phase 2 development. Page 13 of 87 Regulation Conflicts Lake Simcoe Regional Conservation Authority's Fill Regulation Zone 179/06. ez Qras e� Qra's y Legend WATERCOURSE ROAD REGULATION AREA LOT CONCESSION LSRCA JURISDICTION MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY L - - -� LAKE SIMCOE Page 14 of 87 LAKE SMCOE AER-O A -- ONE Transportation Canada Safety Guideline. Regulation Conflicts 1524 M 3.2 km Hazard Zone Airport Reference Point Runway Approach End At -� Page 15 of 87 LAKE rftA� SMC -0E AER-OPARK -- :-ONE Next Steps • In keeping with the Township's Official Plan, it is respectfully requested that as part of the draft plan conditions for the entire Subdivision, that the portion of the lands requiring further study and consultation be placed with a `Hold' designation. • The Functional Servicing and Stormwater Report provides guidance and direction for the orderly and comprehensive development and servicing for the entire property in keeping with the Township's Special development policy D7.5.2. • It has been the position of the developer that when there is a conflict in the regulations between commenting agencies, that issues of public and aviation safety will ultimately take precedent over regulations that request maintaining or enhancing wildlife habitat that is incompatible with the predominate and influencing land usage, i.e., the Lake Simcoe Regional Airport. Page 16 of 87 LAKE SMC -0E AER-O A Next Steps Section J4 of the OP discusses the interpretation of land use designation boundaries. 'It is recognized that the boundaries of the Environmental Protection One designation and Environmental Protection Two overlay designation may be imprecise and subject to change.'— Any refinement to either the Environmental Protection One designation or Environmental Protection Two overlay designation shall not require an Amendment to this Plan.' The Proposal seeks the Township's consideration of the overlay designation boundary for EP1 and EP2 on the most southerly portion of West Half Lot 19 to be incorrect as the lands in question have been utilized for agricultural purposes in the past, and that the proposed road grid and lot layout constitutes the most efficient use for the Site as a whole. LEGEND Environmental Protection One Agricultural Rural Settlement Area Industrial Commercial Airport 19 o— Ceatt Industrial /Commercial OVERLAY DESIGNATIONS u Environmental Protection Two Page 17 of 87 LAKE SMC -0E 4- APB Next Steps The proponent would like the support of the Township's Planning Advisory Committee to instruct Township Planning Staff to: 1. Move expeditiously to prepare Draft Plan of Subdivision Conditions to secure this Development proposal 2. Obtain and coordinate the final comments from all agencies prior to hosting a Public Hearing to be held as soon as possible (i.e. June 2009) 3. Investigate and provide direction to the proponent, the Township and other Stakeholders on how to coordinate the communal servicing of both the Airport and Aeropark lands 4. Provide correspondence on the recommendations arising from this Committee meeting and planning staff comments on this proposal to the proponent. Page 18 of 87 LAKE rftA� SMC -0E AER-OPARK -- _ :-ONE Capacity /Cost Sharing LSA is proposing to negotiate capacity and cost sharing of development servicing opportunities with the Lake Simcoe Regional Airport. Adjacent land parcels and servicing systems can be leveraged to achieve cost savings, better services and improved return on investment on: — Sewage treatment (Modular sewage treatment plant options are being investigated for servicing) — A modular STP has recently been commissioned in the Town of Orangeville sufficient to serve 177 unit residential subdivision — scaling to larger projects possible — Storm water management (Direction of storm water overland flows to improve land utilization) — Road intersections (Traffic management and flows) — Fire hydrant/sprinkler capacity (Additional capacity and extension of existing system) Page 19 of 87 LAKE SMCOE AER-O A - -ONSULTINGLTD. Cooperation Benefits • Accelerated development timelines for Airport growth. • Cost savings and quicker return on investment for servicing expenses. • Improved utilization and increased capacity of valuable Airside Lands for business opportunities. • Greater marketing opportunities and support for new Airport business. • Establishment of the `Critical Mass' for sustainable business growth. Page 20 of 87 LAKE SMCOE AER-O A Thank You Stratega Consulting Ltd www.strategaconsultinq.ca 416 504 -5361 www.lakesimcoeaeropark.ca Page 21 of 87 Agenda Item # 7a) - Report No. DS 2009 -27, Glenn White, Manager of Planning Sery Township nr f REPORT i +C -/ ` . e ;�+ Proud Heritage, Exciting Future Report No. To: Prepared By: DS 2009 -027 Planning Advisory Committee Glenn White, Manager of Planning Services Meeting Date: Subject: Hillway Equipment Motion # May 25, 2009 Ltd. File 2009 - ZBA -02 Part of Lots 8 & 9, Concession 12, Part of Lot 9, Concession Roll #: R.M.S. File #: 010 - 005 -18100 13, Township of Oro - Medonte D14 -38897 Former Township of Oro RECOMMENDATION(S): Requires Action XX For Information Only It is recommended: 1. THAT Report DS 2009 -027 be received and adopted; 2. THAT Zoning By -law Amendment Application 2009 - ZBA -02 for Hillway Equipment Ltd., Part of Lots 8 & 9, Concession 12, Part of Lot 9, Concession 13, Township of Oro - Medonte, (former Township of Oro) on Schedule A13 of Zoning By -law 97 -95 (as amended) is hereby further amended by deleting the required setbacks to pit excavation for the Mineral Aggregate Resource One Exception 163 (MAR1*163) Zone to permit adjacent to woodlot in Part of Lots 8 and 9, Concession 12 and Part of Lot 9, Concession 13 a minimum of 15 metres, 20 metres and 35 metres in locations as identified on Schedule `2' attached hereto. Further, the placement of berms or the storage of topsoil shall not be permitted in the above noted setbacks to pit excavation adjacent to woodlots. 3. That the Clerk bring forward the appropriate By -law for Council's consideration. BACKGROUND: The purpose of this report is to consider a proposed Zoning By -law Amendment application 2009 - ZBA -02 submitted by Skelton Brumwell & Associates Inc. on behalf of Hillway Equipment Limited. Zoning Amendment Application 2009 - ZBA -02 is requesting that the setback to the pit excavation be amended from the minimum 50 metres to the requested 15, 20 and 35 metres setback at various locations abutting existing woodlots on the east and west sides of the pit (as shown on attached Schedule 2). A 20 metre setback is requested at the northeast corner of the pit in Part of Lot 9, Concession 13 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Report No. DS2009 -027 May 25, 2009 Page 1 of 12 Page 22 of 87 Agenda Item # 7a) - Report No. DS 2009 -27, Glenn White, Manager of Planning Sery (Area A), and also a 20 metre setback is requested along the westerly property boundary of the pit in Part of Lot 8, Concession 12 (Area C). Along the westerly boundary of the pit located in Part of Lot 9, Concession 12 (Area B), the requested setback is 15 metres. A 35 metre setback has been proposed in an area located in Part of Lot 8, Concession 12 adjacent to where six immature butternut trees have been located in Area C. The required setback abutting all non - woodlands areas in the licensed aggregate pit is 15 metres except where the property abuts Line 12; the required setback is 30 metres. A public meeting was held on March 30, 2009 to receive comments from members of the public and relevant agencies. The application was circulated to internal Township Departments and outside agencies. ANALYSIS: The subject property is located on the east and west side of Line 12 located in Part of Lot 8 and 9 of Concession 12 and Part of Lot 9, Concession 13, in the Township of Oro - Medonte. The licensed mineral aggregate pit surrounds two properties used for residential purposes located on the west side of Line 12. The licensed mineral aggregate pit consists of approximately 110.6 ha of land. The aggregate licence issued to Hillway Equipment Limited is for an annual extraction of a maximum of 650,000 tones and does not change as result of the requested reduced setbacks to the limits of excavation. The total licenced area of the aggregate pit was 110.6 ha which represent the area right to the property lines. The original area to be extracted was 97.93 ha. The area of the reduced required setbacks will represent an additional area of 6.1 ha which could be extracted. This will result in a total area to be extracted to be 104.03 ha. The total annual amount of extraction will not increase (650,000 tonnes), however, the total area for extraction will increase (6.1 ha) thus giving more area and flexibility of choice in where to extract. The applicant's consultant has indicated there is no impact on traffic generation from the pit since annual extraction will not change. FINANCIAL: Not applicable. POLICIES /LEGISLATION: Township of Oro - Medonte Official Plan: The subject property is designated "Mineral Aggregate Resource — Licenced Area" on Schedule "A" of the Official Plan. The Township of Oro - Medonte Official Plan identifies one environmental feature on lands adjacent to the pit lands. These lands are designated "Oro Moraine Core /Corridor Area" as identified on Schedule "A" of the Official Plan. Schedule "B "- "Natural Features" has identified the same area as a DEVELOPMENT SERVICES May 25, 2009 Report No. DS2009 -027 Page 2 of 12 Page 23 of 87 Agenda Item # 7a) - Report No. DS 2009 -27, Glenn White, Manager of Planning Sery Provincially Significant ANSI (EP1). The Rugby West ANSI feature is located to the west of the pit in Lot 8 and 9, Concession 12. The applicant has submitted an ecological investigations report with the application to amend the Zoning By -law. These studies were submitted to address the requirements of the Official Plan. The studies were reviewed by the Ministry of Natural Resources (the commenting agency) and found to be acceptable and met their requirements. Zoning By -law 97 -95: The subject lands are presently zoned Mineral Aggregate Resource One Exception 163 (MAR1 *163) Zone. Exception 163 provides the following: a) setback to pit excavation, adjacent to existing woodlots in the west half of Lots 8 and 9, concession 12 and in the west Lots 8 and 9, concession 13, shall be a minimum of 50 metres, b) No washing of aggregate on site is permitted, c) No extraction below 1.5 metres above the water table is permitted. (Please note there is a mistake contained in the text of exception 163 regarding the property description. In the rest of the text of the original By -law 2005 -098, the property description was described correctly.) Zoning Amendment Application 2009- ZBA -02 is requesting that the setback to the pit excavation be amended from the minimum 50 metres to the requested 15, 20 and 35 metres setback at various locations abutting existing woodlots on the east and west sides of the pit (as shown on attached Zoning By -law schedule). A 20 metre setback is requested at the northeast corner of the pit in Part of Lot 9, Concession 13 (Area A), and also a 20 metre setback is requested along the westerly property boundary of the pit in Part of Lot 8, Concession 12 (Area C). Along the westerly boundary of the pit located in Part of Lot 9, Concession 12 (Area B), the requested setback is 15 metres. A 35 metre setback has been proposed in an area located in Part of Lot 8, Concession 12 adjacent to where six immature butternut trees have been located in Area C. The Ministry of Natural Resources has requested a minimum 25 metre radius protective buffer from the stem of the butternut must be maintained. The applicant is exceeding that buffer with the above noted 35 metre setback in the area adjacent to the butternut. It is noted that the MAR1 Zone in Zoning By -law 97 -95 requires that no part of a pit shall be located closer than 30 metres from a street or a Residential Zone or 15 metre from any interior side or rear lot line that not serve as a Residential Zone boundary. No setback from the interior side or rear lot line that serves as a boundary between two or more lots that are in the MAR1 Zone. Therefore, the proposed 15 metre and 20 metre setbacks would meet and exceed the normal By -law setback requirements for a pit. County Official Plan Township staff reviewed both the County Official Plan currently in effect as well as the Plan adopted by County Council in November 2008 but not yet in full force and effect. Section 4.4.1 of the new County Official Plan includes policies that mineral aggregate operations shall be located according to the following criteria: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES May 25, 2009 Report No. DS2009 -027 Page 3 of 12 Page 24 of 87 Agenda Item # 7a) - Report No. DS 2009 -27, Glenn White, Manager of Planning Sery - Shall not be permitted on adjacent lands to the natural heritage features and areas identified above unless the ecological function of the adjacent lands has been evaluated and it has been demonstrated that there will be no negative impacts on the natural features or on their ecological functions. The applicant has submitted an ecological investigations study to address this policy. The Ministry of Natural Resources memo of March 26, 2009 confirms satisfaction of this policy and states the following: "this Ministry is satisfied that the amendments to the setbacks will not result in any negative impacts to the features and functions of the Rugby West provincially significant Life Science ANSI and to the butternut, an endangered species." Provincial Policy Statement The Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) states in Section 2.5.1: "Mineral aggregate resources shall be protected for long -term use." Section 2.5.2.1 states: "As much of the mineral aggregate resources as is realistically possible shall be made available as close to markets as possible." Section 2.5.2.2 states that "Extraction shall be undertaken in a manner which minimizes social and environmental impacts." Section 2.5.2.3 states: "The conservation of mineral aggregate resources should be promoted by making provision for the recovery of these resources, wherever feasible." The PPS contains policies to protect the mineral aggregate resource for long -term use. The operation of an aggregate pit is a permitted use by the Township's Official Plan and Zoning By -law. This zoning amendment application is to consider a proposed reduction in setbacks to limit of extraction not the issue of use. With the submission of the environmental studies and the accepting and approval from the Ministry of Natural Resources, this proposed zoning amendment application is considered to be consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement. Places to Grow Under the Chapter 4, "Protecting What is Valuable ", the Places to Grow - Growth Plan contains policies related to mineral aggregate resources. Section 4.2.3 states the following: 1. Through sub -area assessment, the Ministers of Public Infrastructure Renewal and Natural Resources will work with municipalities, producers of mineral aggregate resources, and other stakeholders to identify significant mineral aggregate resources for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (GGH), and to develop a long -term strategy for ensuring the wise use, conservation, availability and management of mineral aggregate resources in the GGH, as well as identifying opportunities for resource recovery and for co- ordinated approaches to rehabilitation where feasible." The Growth Plan does not have policies directly related to site specific setbacks for the operation of an aggregate pit, however, does recommend a long -term strategy for ensuring the wise use, conservation, availability and management of mineral aggregate resources. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES May 25, 2009 Report No. DS2009 -027 Page 4 of 12 Page 25 of 87 Agenda Item # 7a) - Report No. DS 2009 -27, Glenn White, Manager of Planning Sery Ecological Investigations The applicant has submitted an Ecological Investigations report which has evaluated the proposed new setbacks to the areas of excavation adjacent to wood lot/wood land on the boundaries of the licenced aggregate pit. The ecological investigations and evaluation of the health and effect of the reduced setback on the adjacent woodland features were conducted by Mr. Peter Gill, Landscape Consultant and Registered Professional Forester with additional ecological consideration conducted by David Hawke. The intent and scope of the investigation was reviewed by staff of the Ministry of Natural Resources in September and November of 2008 before they were submitted to the Township in support of Zoning Amendment Application 2009- ZBA -02. The investigation reviewed ecological features and their functions of the adjacent woodlands and the Rugby West ANSI and conducted an evaluation and analysis of the potential impacts of the proposed setback reduction of the extraction upon these features and their functions. The Rugby West ANSI is located approximately 100 and 150 metres to the west of the westerly boundary of the pit in Lots 8 and 9, Concession 12. The consultants concluded that the existing open field buffers could be reduced to the proposed setbacks of this application without adversely affecting the health and quality of the adjoining woodlands. Ministry of Natural Resources The submitted Ecological Investigations study was circulated to the Ministry of Natural Resources for comment. On March 26, 2009, Planning Staff received the following comments from the MNR: "This Ministry provided comments on a proposed aggregates site plan amendment at the above -noted location on December 5, 2008, a copy of which is included in the zoning application package. According to the zoning application, a reduction in setbacks is requested at three locations within the existing aggregate licence area: Lot 9, Concession 13 — reduction in setback from 50m to 20m Lot 9, Concession 12 — reduction in setback from 50m to 15m Lot 8, Concession 12 — reduction in setback from 50m to 20m We have no objections to the first 2 reductions as listed above. The third setback should include an additional 15m setback as shown on the Reduced Setbacks plan attached to the application to ensure adequate protection of butternut on site. Based on the evidence submitted by the applicant in support of the setback revisions and provided a 25m buffer is maintained around the butternut on site, this Ministry is satisfied that the amendments to the setbacks will not result in any negative impacts to the features and functions of the Rugby West provincially significant Life Science ANSI and to the butternut, an endangered species." DEVELOPMENT SERVICES May 25, 2009 Report No. DS2009 -027 Page 5 of 12 Page 26 of 87 Agenda Item # 7a) - Report No. DS 2009 -27, Glenn White, Manager of Planning Sery CONSULTATIONS: No concerns were given by both internal departments. The Ministry of Natural Resources has provided comment as detailed above. There were verbal and written comments received from surrounding neighboring residents at the public meeting on March 30, 2009. Comments received from the public at the March 30, 2009 Public meeting were mainly of concern about the proposal to expression of non - support and one comment of no objection. Some residents would not endorse any changes to the pit that will potentially put the use of any conservation lands at risk. Some residents expressed concerns and not supporting the proposed 15m setback abutting the west property line in Part Lot 9, Concession 12. Other concerns expressed were related to the possibility that berms and top soil can be stored in the area of the proposed setbacks. Other topics of concern were related to erosion and the stability of abutting owner's property with the reduced setbacks, damage to tree roots and decrease in property values ATTACHMENTS: Schedule 1: Location Map Schedule 2: Reduced Setback Site Plan Schedule 3: Draft By -law CONCLUSION: Zoning Amendment Application 2009- ZBA -02 proposes to reduce the required 50 metre setback to pit excavation adjacent to existing woodlots located in Part of Lots 8 and 9, Concession 12 and Part of Lot 9, Concession 13. A 20 metre setback is requested at the northeast corner of the pit in Part of Lot 9, Concession 13 (Area A), and also a 20 metre setback is requested along the westerly property boundary of the pit in Part of Lot 8, Concession 12 (Area C). Also along the westerly boundary of the pit located in Part of Lot 9, Concession 12 (Area B), the requested setback is 15 metres. A 35 metre setback has been proposed in an area located in Part of Lot 8, Concession 12 adjacent to where six immature butternut trees have been located in Area C. Please refer to attached site plan for setback locations. The Ministry of Natural Resources is satisfied that the amendments to the setbacks will not result in any negative impacts to the features and functions of the Rugby West provincially significant Life Science ANSI and to the butternut, an endangered species." Planning staff support the proposed reduction of the setbacks to the pit excavation adjacent to the woodlots. Staff also recommends that no berming be permitted within the proposed reduced setback. This would address comments received during the Public Meeting of March 30, 2009. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES May 25, 2009 Report No. DS2009 -027 Page 6 of 12 Page 27 of 87 Agenda Item # 7a) - Report No. DS 2009 -27, Glenn White, Manager of Planning Sery The proposed Zoning By -law Amendment conforms to the general intent of the Official Plan and the provisions of the Zoning By -law. On this basis, it is recommended that Zoning By -law Amendment Application 2009- ZBA -02 be approved and adopted by Council. The Zoning By -law Amendment is attached for reference. Respectfully submitted: Glenn White, MCIP, RPP Manager of Planning Services SMT Approval / Comments: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Report No. DS2009 -027 C.A.O. Approval / Comments: stay 25, 2009 Page 7 of 12 Page 28 of 87 Agenda Item # 7a) - Report No. DS 2009 -27, Glenn White, Manager of Planning Sery SCHEDULE 1: LOCATION MAP 2009- ZBA -02 (Hillway Equipment Ltd.) YJ f A ASS KE i I I z i � I -- Z FT a OLD nAFVIE w� z APPLICANTS LANDS I i DEVELOPMENT SERVICES May 25, 2009 Report No. DS2009 -027 Page 8 of 12 Page 29 of 87 Agenda Item # 7a) - Report No. IDS 2009-27, Glenn White, Manager of Planning Sery C: 1:13 IL cz Ul S Y ZJ IS 9 0 -2 20 oE 54 2 HO lld� m Lip-, A- 1 - - - --------------- Am 1�111 " "' ,� It Z— 9Z2 Page 30 of 87 C%l U 9 a) 0 0 N uo L 6 z U 0 ;b C. U 0 ab X Z— 9Z2 Page 30 of 87 C%l U 9 a) 0 0 N uo L 6 z U 0 ;b C. U 0 Agenda Item # 7a) - Report No. DS 2009 -27, Glenn White, Manager of Planning Sery Schedule 3: Draft By -law THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO- MEDONTE BY- LAW NO. 2009- xxx A By -law to amend the zoning provisions which apply to lands within Part of Lots 8 and 9, Concession 12 and Part of Lot 9, Concession 13 (Former Township of Oro), now in the Township of Oro - Medonte (Hillway Equipment Ltd. 2009- ZBA -02) WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Township of Oro - Medonte is empowered to pass By -laws to regulate the use of land pursuant to Section 34 of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.P.13; AND WHEREAS Council deems it appropriate to amend an exception to the Zoning By- law to permit the development of mineral aggregate resources uses, in accordance with Section C12 of the Official Plan; NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Corporation of the Township of Oro - Medonte hereby enacts as follows: Schedule `A13' to Zoning By -law 97 -95, as amended, is hereby further amended by changing the required setbacks to pit excavation applying to the lands located in Part of Lots 8 and 9, Concession 12 and Part of Lot 9, Concession 13, in the former geographic Township of Oro, now in the Township of Oro - Medonte, contained in the Mineral Aggregate Resource One Exception 163 (MAR1 *163) Zone as shown on Schedule `A' attached hereto and forming part of this By -law. 2. Section 7 — Exceptions of Zoning By -law 97 -95 as amended is hereby further amended by deleting subsection a) and adding the following subsection: "7.163 *163 — Part of Lots 8 and 9, Concession 12 and Part of Lot 9, Concession 13 (Former Oro), now Township of Oro - Medonte. (a) setbacks to pit excavation, adjacent to woodlot in Part of Lots 8 and 9, Concession 12 and Part of Lot 9, Concession 13 shall be a minimum of 15 metres, 20 metres and 35 metres in locations as identified on Schedule `A' attached hereto. The placement of berms or the storage of topsoil shall not be permitted in the above noted setbacks to pit excavation adjacent to woodlots. This By -law shall come into effect upon the date of passage hereof, subject to the provisions of the Planning Act, as amended. BY -LAW READ A FIRST AND SECOND TIME THIS DAY OF , 2009. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES May 25, 2009 Report No. DS2009 -027 Page 31 of 87 Agenda Item # 7a) - Report No. DS 2009 -27, Glenn White, Manager of Planning Sery BY -LAW READ A THIRD TIME AND FINALLY PASSED THIS DAY OF , 2009. THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO- MEDONTE Mayor, H.S. Hughes Clerk, J. Douglas Irwin DEVELOPMENT SERVICES May 25, 2009 Report No. DS2009 -027 Page 32 of 87 Agenda Item # 7a) - Report No. DS 2009 -27, Glenn White, Manager of Planning Sery Schedule A' to By -/a w No. 2009 -xxx This is Schedule 'A' to By -Law 2009 -xxx passed the day of , 2009. Mayor H.S. Hughes Clerk J. Douglas Irwin TOWNSHIP OF ORO- MEDONTE (FILE 2009- ZBA -02) DEVELOPMENT SERVICES May 25, 2009 Report No. DS2009 -027 Page 33 of 87 Agenda Item # 7b) - Report No. DS 2009 -28, Proposed Zoning By -law Amendment Appl... �7'ou�t� z�o, f REPORT Proud Heritage, Exciting Future Report No. To: Prepared By: DS2009 -028 Planning Advisory Committee Andria Leigh, Director of Development Services Meeting Date: Subject: Proposed Zoning By- Motion # May 25, 2009 law Amendment Application 2009 - ZBA -06, Ferris, 77 Line 12 North, Part of the West Half Roll #: R.M.S. File #: 010-005-10100 of Lot 19, Concession 13 D14 39078 (Oro), Township of Oro - Medonte RECOMMENDATION(S): Requires Action For Information Only It is recommended: 1. THAT Report DS 2009 -028 be received and adopted; and 2. THAT Zoning By -law Amendment Application 2009 - ZBA -06 for Ferris, 77 Line 12 North, Part of the West Half of Lot 19, Concession 13 (Oro), Township of Oro - Medonte on Schedule All of Zoning By -law 97 -95, as amended, from the Rural Residential Two (RUR2) Zone to the Agricultural /Rural Exception 188 Holding (A/RU *188(H)) Zone be approved; and 3. THAT the Clerk bring forward the appropriate By -law for Council's consideration. BACKGROUND: The purpose of this report is to consider the proposed amendment to the Township's Zoning By -law regarding the above noted property, and make recommendations to Planning Advisory Committee as to the disposition of the matter. The lands affected are located north of Highway 11 on the east side of Line 12 North being Part of the West Half of Lot 19, Concession 13 and municipally known as 77 Line 12 North as noted in Attachment #1 of this report. A public meeting was held on April 27, 2009 to receive comments from members of the public and relevant agencies. The application was circulated to internal Township Departments and outside agencies, and comments were received from the Township DEVELOPMENT SERVICES May 25, 2009 Report No. DS2009 -028 Page 1 of 7 Page 34 of 87 Agenda Item # 7b) - Report No. DS 2009 -28, Proposed Zoning By -law Amendment Appl... Transportation and Environmental Services and the Ministry of Transportation. The Transportation and Environmental Services department comments identify the requirement for a permit to be obtained for the proposed driveway widening (Area B identified in Attachment #2) which can be addressed through the Site Plan process. The Ministry of Transportation comments indicate the requirement for all features relevant to the site (fire route, parking, loading areas, storage, buildings) to be located beyond the Ministry's 14.0 setback — all development identified on the site plan is further than the 14.0 setback; and also the requirement for both a sign and building and land use permit —the applicant will be required to obtain both in order for the site plan to be considered by Council. No additional public comments were received at the meeting or subsequently in writing. As a home industry, the property will be subject to Site Plan Control in order to ensure that signage, outdoor storage, parking, etc. are addressed and can be enforced. ANALYSIS: The applicant proposes to operate a home industry on the subject lands which is located on the east side of Line 12 North immediately north of Highway 11. The property has 173 metres of frontage on Line 12 North with a depth of 45 metres and a lot area of 0.79 hectares. The proposed home industry will conduct the repair, maintenance, and sale of agricultural, small industrial, and recreational equipment. The applicant has been conducting a smaller scale more informal version of this business primarily related to agricultural equipment for a number of years; but has indicated that they wish to expand the business to include the additional types of equipment. The site plan identifies a potential coverall structure for additional storage, a sign, and also a new gravel lot for the storage of equipment associated with the home industry all of which would be over 60 metres from the Highway 11 corridor. As noted above, permits for the site from the MTO will be required as part of the Site Plan process. The Zoning By -law Amendment Application proposes to amend the zoning of the subject parcel from Rural Residential Two (RUR2) Zone to an Agricultural /Rural Exception Holding (A/RU*188(H)) Zone to permit the home industry. The lands will be subject to a holding provision which is not intended to be removed until the approval and execution of a Site Plan Agreement. FINANCIAL: Not applicable. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES May 25, 2009 Report No. DS2009 -028 Page 2 of 7 Page 35 of 87 Agenda Item # 7b) - Report No. DS 2009 -28, Proposed Zoning By -law Amendment Appl... POLICIES /LEGISLATION: Township of Oro - Medonte Official Plan: The subject lands are designated "Agricultural" by the Township of Oro - Medonte Official Plan. The Agricultural designation permits "Home Industries" subject to Section C1.3.3 of the Official Plan. C1.3.3 Home Industries Home industries are small -scale industrial uses that are accessory to agricultural operations or single detached dwellings on large rural lots. These uses should not detract from the primary use of the property for agricultural or residential purposes. Home industries may include welding, carpentry, or machine shops, or agriculturally related uses that involve the processing of regionally produced agricultural crops or other products. The accessory retail sales of products produced in the home industry is also permitted. The repair, storage, or sale of motor vehicles is not considered to be a home industry. Home industries may be permitted, subject to re- zoning, provided Council is satisfied that: a) The building housing the home industry is located within the existing farm - building cluster, if located on a farm property; This is not applicable. b) The home industry has a floor area that is consistent with the scale of uses on the property; The existing barn structure contains a floor area of approximately 1120 square feet. The future coverall would propose an additional 1500 square foot (maximum) on the property. c) The home industry and any activity area associated with the home industry is setback from all lot lines by at least 30 metres; The new building associated with the home industry are proposed to be a minimum of 12 metres from all property lines which will be enforced through the site plan and building permit approvals. d) The noise, dust, odour that could potentially emanate from the use will not have an adverse impact on adjacent properties; The storage is intended to be located within the existing and proposed buildings and the outdoor storage area, no manufacturing is proposed on site and therefore noise, dust and odour issues are not anticipated. e) The type and level of traffic generated by the use is compatible with the character of the area and the function of adjacent roads; The additional traffic anticipated to the site would be the delivery and pick up of equipment and would be consistent with current traffic usage on this road. The applicant has indicated in the application a maximum of five vehicles attending the site per day. f) The operator of the home industry resides on the property, The applicant who is the operator of the home industry also resides in the existing dwelling. g) All machinery and equipment, with the exception of motor vehicles, required for the home industry is located within enclosed buildings; Through the site plan DEVELOPMENT SERVICES May 25, 2009 Report No. DS2009 -028 Page 3 of 7 Page 36 of 87 Agenda Item # 7b) - Report No. DS 2009 -28, Proposed Zoning By -law Amendment Appl... approval process storage of machinery and equipment within enclosed buildings or compounds will be controlled. h) Any open storage associated with the home industry is screened from view and located within a fenced compound; A fenced compound for equipment and material storage has been identified and appropriate screening will be confirmed through the site plan control process. i) The home industry has a limited number of employees, The applicant has advised that the number of employees required for this business is currently two and could include limited additional student help. j) Any retail component of the home industry is clearly accessory to the home industry and does not detract from the primary use of the property. The retail component of this business is identified in the site specific zoning and will be controlled through the site plan agreement. It is also noted that the Official Plan requires the development of a new home industry to be subject to Site Plan Control. Zoning By -law 97 -95: The subject parcel of land is presently zoned Rural Residential Two; the proposed zoning by -law amendment proposes to amend to a site specific Agricultural /Rural zone to permit the home industry, recognize the lot area and setbacks identified in this report. The subject parcel is 0.78 hectares (1.95 acres) in total lot area and will provide a 12 metre minimum setback from all property lines for the home industry. CONSULTATIONS: Township departments — Transportation requirement for new driveway permit for enlarged driveway. MTO — identify requirement for Building and Land Use Permit and Sign Permit as part of Site Plan process. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment #1 Location Map Attachment #2 Applicant's Site Plan Drawing DEVELOPMENT SERVICES May 25, 2009 Report No. DS2009 -028 Page 4 of 7 Page 37 of 87 Agenda Item # 7b) - Report No. DS 2009 -28, Proposed Zoning By -law Amendment Appl... CONCLUSION: The proposed Zoning By -law Amendment conforms to the general intent of the Official Plan and the provisions of the Zoning By -law. On this basis, it is recommended that Zoning By -law Amendment Application 2009- ZBA -06 be approved and adopted by Council. Respectfully submitted: s Andria Leigh, MCIP, RPP Director of Development Services SMT Approval / Comments: I C.A.O. Approval / Comments: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES May 25, 2009 Report No. DS2009 -028 Page 5 of 7 Page 38 of 87 Agenda Item # 7b) - Report No. DS 2009 -28, Proposed Zoning By -law Amendment Appl... ATTACHMENT 1: LOCATION MAP 2009- ZBA- 06(Ferris) ®LANDS TO DE REZONED FROM THE IV RURAL RESIDENTIAL TWO (RUR2) ZONE TO'THE AGRICULTURAURURAL EXCEPTION 188 HOLDING (A/RU-1 88(H)) ZONE N Z J 77 LINE 12 NORTH / F ,.J r t i ! N i W <' 0 20 80 80 120 160 Meters i DEVELOPMENT SERVICES May 25, 2009 Report No. DS2009 -028 Page 6 of 7 Page 39 of 87 Agenda Item # 7b) - Report No. DS 2009 -28, Proposed Zoning By -law Amendment Appl... ATTACHMENT 2: SITE PLAN 2009- ZBA- 06(Ferris) Rvp�sed Aron � cln�ycs A• G�ra�ed lo+ f3- ug&Aed C Beard ponce Zohc Ctia^gt ` I�� LiK P�cpos «! C Sinn ��+ « sJc Grp„c 1 l4rca 9 Or CW Ka�� n0 +i.o.n 'IOxIZ 9, NOO K zoo Sri 1 .S �n•p<; C DEVELOPMENT SERVICES May 25, 2009 Report No. DS2009 -028 Page 7 of 7 Page 40 of 87 Agenda Item # 7b) - Report No. DS 2009 -28, Proposed Zoning By -law Amendment Appl... THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO- MEDONTE BY- LAW NO. 2009 -063 A By -law to amend the zoning provisions which apply to lands within Part of Lot 19, Concession 13, 77 Line 12 North (Former Township of Oro), now in the Township of Oro - Medonte (Ferris 2009- ZBA -06) WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Township of Oro - Medonte is empowered to pass By -laws to regulate the use of land pursuant to Section 34 of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.P.13; AND WHEREAS Council deems it appropriate to rezone the lands to permit the development of home industries, in accordance with Section C1.3.3 of the Official Plan; NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Corporation of the Township of Oro - Medonte hereby enacts as follows: 1. Schedule 'At 1' to Zoning By -law 97 -95, as amended, is hereby further amended by changing the zone symbol applying to the land located in Part of Lot 19, Concession 13, municipally known as 77 Line 12 North, in the former geographic Township of Oro, now in the Township of Oro - Medonte, from Rural Residential Two (RUR2) Zone to the Agricultural /Rural Exception Holding (A/RU *188 (H)) as shown on Schedule 'A' attached hereto and forming part of this By -law. 2. Section 7 —Exceptions of Zoning By -law 97 -95 as amended is hereby further amended by the addition of the following subsection: "7.185 *188 — Part of Lot 19, Concession 13, (Former Oro) municipally known as 77 Line 12 North, (a) Notwithstanding any other provision in this By -law, a Home Industry for the repair, maintenance, and sale of agricultural, small industrial and recreation equipment is permitted on the lands denoted by the symbol *188 on the schedule to this By -law." as shown on Schedule "A" to this By -law; In addition the following provision applies: (b) Minimum lot area 0.78 hectares (1.95 acres) (c) Minimum required yard adjacent to any lot line 12 metres (39.3 feet) ". 3. The lands zoned Agricultural/Rural Exception (A/RU *188) shall be subject to a Holding (H) Provision in accordance with Section 2.5 of By -law 97 -95, as amended. The Holding Provision shall not be removed until a Site Plan Agreement that is satisfactory to Council has been entered into. 4. This By -law shall come into effect upon the date of passage hereof, subject to the provisions of the Planning Act, as amended. BY -LAW READ A FIRST AND SECOND TIME THIS 27T" DAY OF MAY, 2009. BY -LAW READ A THIRD TIME AND FINALLY PASSED THIS DAY OF 2009. THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO- MEDONTE Mayor, H.S. Hughes Clerk, J. Douglas Irwin Page 41 of 87 Agenda Item # 7b) - Report No. DS 2009 -28, Proposed Zoning By -law Amendment Appl... Schedule 'A' to By -law No. 2009 -063 This is Schedule 'A' to By -Law 2009 -063 passed the day of , 2009. LANDS REZONED FROM THE I 1 ii' RE ® RURAL RESIDENTIAL TWO (RUR2) ZONE TO THE AGRICU LTURAURURAL EXCEPTION 188 HOLDING (IVRU`188(H))ZONE N I W z TT LINE 12 irr' i R ^�J N t1J z J 0 20 40 80 120 160 i Meters Mayor H.S. Hughes Clerk J. Douglas Irwin TOWNSHIP OF ORO- MEDONTE (FILE 2009- ZBA -06) Page 42 of 87 Agenda Item # 7c) - Planning Application Status Report, May, 2009. \Q OF OR0,4, O TOWNSHIP OF ORO- MEDONTE MEMORANDUM To: Planning Advisory Committee cc: Robin Dunn, C.A.O., Department Heads From: Andria Leigh, Director of R.M. File #: Development Services Date: May 25, 2009 Roll #: Subject: Status - Planning Applications FILE AND LEGAL TYPE OF STATUS RECOMMENDED ACTION DESCRIPTION APPLICATION D1 Official Plan Application approved Applicant met with Staff Ucci, D09 P115/01 Amendment for Adult by Ontario Municipal regarding Plan of Condominium Part of Lot 27, Conc. 5 Lifestyle Community Board for 40 units and Site Plan Application (Oro) and golf course. submissions. Await submission of applications for review. D2 Re- zoning from Refused by Council, Decision regarding Plan of Thatcher, D14 P138/02 Agricultural /Rural OMB Hearing Subdivision and Zoning OMB Part of Lot 15, Conc. 9 Exception to adjourned until plan appeal reviewed by Council (Medonte) Residential One of sub application March 25, 2009. Holding Zone (2004- SUB -02) is Zoning By -law 2009 -044 17 residential lots processed by Twp approved April 8, 2009. D3 Re- zoning from Ltr received from Letter to applicant regarding 1254554 Ontario Limited General Commercial applicant's solicitor, status and outstanding (Ken Secord), D14 (03) to General hired transportation materials, file to be closed. P145/03, Commercial consultant to address Part of Lot 15, Conc.1, Exception to permit MTO letter and 51 R -2993, Part 1 and auction sales required approvals 51 R- 27229, Part 2 Orillia Page 43 of 87 Agenda Item # 7c) - Planning Application Status Report, May, 2009. FILE AND LEGAL TYPE OF STATUS RECOMMENDED ACTION DESCRIPTION APPLICATION D4 Official Plan & Zoning Application on hold Application to be processed 1204600 Ontario Ltd, Amendments and pending subsequent to Council decision D09, D14, & D12 P- Plan of Subdivision to consideration of regarding Craighurst Secondary 146/03 & S -1/03, Lots 18- permit 183 residential Craighurst Secondary Plan. 36, Plan 91, Part of Lot lot subdivision Plan (OPA # 27) Craighurst Secondary Plan 41 & 42, Conc. 1 report going to Council in May (Medonte) 2009. D5 Official Plan Application circulation None at this time Blueberry Beach (Robert Amendment to complete, comments Lean), 2004- OPA -01, expand Shoreline provided to applicant 2004 - ZBA -05 designation to permit for revisions to East Part of Lot 20, Conc. creation of residential application 1 (Orillia) lots, re- zoning to Shoreline Residential zone D6 Site Specific Approved by OMB hearing scheduled for Ian & Lori Webb, D 09 designation to permit Township; awaiting December 2008 adjourned. New (05) 2005- OPA -02 severance of County approval. hearing date has not been Conc. 11, N Pt Lot 3 veterinary clinic County OPA confirmed. (Medonte), 3808 Line 11 approved; awaiting North MMAH approval. D7 Re- zoning from Awaiting circulation Waiting action from the applicant 638230 Ont. Ltd. (Keyzer) Agricultural /Rural to comments prior to a D 14 (05) 2005 -ZBA- 33, Residential One, preliminary report to Part of Lot 5, Conc. 13 Draft Plan of PAC (Medonte) Subdivision Approved for 55 residential lots D8 Rezoning from A /RU Circulation completed None at this time. Kellwat Ltd & Fred Grant to R1* Zone, and to department heads Square Ltd. D 12 (06), D Plan of Subdivision and agencies. 14 (06), 2006 - SUB -01, for 97 lot residential Applicant considering 2006 - ZBA -01, Conc. 4, subdivision alternate designs and South Part Lot 4 (Oro) pending servicing Township of Oro- General Zoning By- Statutory Public Final mapping revisions ongoing. Medonte, 2006 - ZBA -08, law Review update Meeting Held June Consultant to complete mapping Zoning By -law Review 2006. Draft mapping spring 2009 for Council's completion, site visit consideration. with various property owners ongoing. D9 Rezoning to permit By -law approved by Applicant to submit a Site Plan Meyer, 2006 - ZBA -11, contractor's yard and Council on October 8, application. 8976 Highway 12 West, storage units. 2008 without the Con. 1, South Part Lot 1 contractor's yard use. former) Orillia D10 Rezoning and plan of Public meeting held Applicant to address comments Stonehedge Holdings, subdivision for the on October 27, raised at the Public Meeting. 2007- OPA -01, 2007 -ZBA- creation of 7 rural 2008.Awaiting 03, Part of Lot 21, Con 14 residential lots comments from Oro LSRCA. -2- Page 44 of 87 Agenda Item # 7c) - Planning Application Status Report, May, 2009. FILE AND LEGAL TYPE OF STATUS RECOMMENDED ACTION DESCRIPTION APPLICATION D11 OPA and rezoning to OPA and By -law Zoning By -law appealed to 1698165 Ont. Inc. permit the approved by Council OMB. Site Plan application (Ossom Enterprises Inc.) redevelopment of the on October 8, 2008. submitted by applicant. Twp to 2008 - ZBA -06, 2008 -OPA- site for various Zoning Amendment circulate site plan for comments 01, 2976 Highway 11, commercial uses. appealed to OMB. from agencies. Part Lot 20, Con. 7 (Oro) OPA approved by County. D12 Rezoning to permit at Zoning By -law Applicant to submit a Site Plan RDR Marine Systems, home industry. passed by Council on application to remove the 2007 - ZBA -08, 551 Line 9 Agricultural /Rural November 12, 2008. Holding provision. South, Part Lot 24, Con Zone to A /RU 10 (Oro) Exception Hold Zone. D13 OPA and rezoning to OPA and Zoning OPA approved by County. 1198677 Ontario Ltd., create four residential Amendment Applicant to proceed with 2008 - ZBA -10 & 2008- lots. approved Feb 11 Consent applications to create OPA -02 South side of 2009. lots. Horseshoe Valley Rd. and West side of Line 4, Lot 1, Con. 5 (Oro). D14 ZBA and Subdivision Application circulated Wait for comments to be Lake Simcoe Aeropark application to permit to internal and returned. Inc. development of external agencies for 2008 - ZBA -14 & 2008- industrial park (77 comment. SUB -02 East side of Line lots). 7 and North of Highway 11, West Part of Lot 18 & 19, Con. 8 Oro D15 ZBA to reduce Public Meeting held Staff report to be considered at Hillway Equipment Ltd. setback from the March 30, 2009. May 25, 2009 meeting. 2009 - ZBA -02 Part of Lots property line to the Report to PAC May 8 & 9, Concession 12, limit of aggregate 25, 2009 Part of Lot 9, Con. 13 extraction. Oro D16 ZBA to place a zone Public Meeting held None at this time. Township of Oro - Medonte on a part of the March 25, 2009. 2009 - ZBA -04 former road Report North of Ski Trails Road, allowance deemed recommending Part 1,2,3,4 and 5 of Plan surplus by Council. approval to Council 51 R -36467 being Part of May 20, 2009. Lot 15 and Part of the Original Road allowance between Lots 15 and 16, Con. 1 Oro D17 OPA and ZBA to Public Meeting held None at this time. Township of Oro - Medonte consider the May 4, 2009 (Try Recycling) additional permission 2009 - ZBA -07 & 2009- for a Recycling OPA -01, Part of the West Establishment Half of Lot 11, permitting the storage Concession 8, Township and processing of of Oro - Medonte (formerly recyclable materials Oro), 1525 Line 7 North -3- Page 45 of 87 Agenda Item # 7c) - Planning Application Status Report, May, 2009. FILE AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION TYPE OF APPLICATION STATUS RECOMMENDED ACTION D18 ZBA to construct a Application received Public Meeting to be held June Helios Energy Inc. large scale solar and circulated. 22, 2009. Open House to be 2009 - ZBA -08, Part of energy project 30 residential lots held, date to be determined. Lots 11, 12, 13, 14, Con. comprised of 6,429 S2 9 (Medonte) solar panel tracker P21/88 Moss Lot 11, Concession 2 2008. Report DS 2009 -009 approved one year extension of units (Oro) draft plan approval to complete plan registration. D19 Part of Lot 5, Con 14 Public Meeting held Twp is waiting for comments C. Andersen 2008 -SUB- (Medonte), East side March 2, 2009. from agencies. Applicant to 01 & 2008 - ZBA -13, of Hw12, south of Currently awaiting proceed with cost sharing with Warminster Sideroad, NVCA and other other developers in Warminster. 22 residential lots agency comments. Subsequent staff report to Report BP 2008 -082 adopted by Council on December 17, P1/91 Houben Applicant has proceed to PAC for (Oro) submitted revised consideration regarding 26 residential lots plan, subdivision and zoning Report DS 2009 -009 adopted by Council on February 11, 2009 P5/94 Horseshoe Timber (Medonte) amendment applications. DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION APPLICATIONS File Description Recommended Action S1 OM -T -93003 (Part Report DS 2009 -009 adopted by Council on February 11, 2009 D12 P13/87 Lot 1, Concession 14 granting one year extension for draft plan approval. Applicant J. Johnston Construction (Oro) working with NVCA staff. Ltd. 30 residential lots Subdivision S2 OM -T -91050 Part of Subdivision agreement approved by Council on September 10, P21/88 Moss Lot 11, Concession 2 2008. Report DS 2009 -009 approved one year extension of (Oro) draft plan approval to complete plan registration. 21 residential lots S3 43T -93022 Part of Report DS 2009 -009 adopted by Council on February 11, 2009 P4/90 Lot 1 and 2, Conc. 7 granted a two year extension for draft plan approval. Second Capobianco (Sabiston) (Oro) engineering submission drawings submitted and review 83 residential lots comments provided to applicant. Draft Subdivision Agreement to be prepared once drawings approved. S4 OM -T -94003 Part of Report BP 2008 -082 adopted by Council on December 17, P1/91 Houben Lot 10, Conc. 10 2008 granted a one year extension for draft plan approval. (Oro) Actively working towards registration of subdivision. 26 residential lots S5 Part of Lot 1, Conc. 4 Report DS 2009 -009 adopted by Council on February 11, 2009 P5/94 Horseshoe Timber (Medonte) granted three year extension for draft plan approval. Ridge 250 residential lots S6 OM -T -90082 Part of Report DS 2009 -009 adopted by Council on February 11, 2009 P77/98 638230 Ont. Ltd. Lot 5, Conc. 13 granted one year extension for draft plan approval. (Keyzer) (Medonte) 55 residential lots S7 OM -T -90046 Part of Report DS 2009 -009 adopted by Council on February 11, 2009 Homire Lot 5, Conc. 14 granted one year extension for draft plan approval. (Medonte) 28 residential lots S8 OM -T -91031 Part of Subdivision agreement revisions being completed. Engineering P13/89 Buffalo Springs Lots 2 and 3, submission under review. Concession 9 (Oro) 230 residential lots S9 43T -93019 Part of Subdivision Agreements signed, awaiting submission of P52/89 Diamond Valley Lot 2 and 3, Conc. 7 required securities to prepare report to Council for execution of Estates Valdor (Oro) subdivision agreement. -4- Page 46 of 87 Agenda Item # 7c) - Planning Application Status Report, May, 2009. -5- Page 47 of 87 137 residential lots S10 RC 43 -OM -20001 Phase 1 registered and constructed. Redline Revision P100 /00 Horseshoe Part of Lots 3 and 4, submitted for Phase 2 lands currently being reviewed and Resort /Laurelview Conc. 4 (Oro) circulated by Township. Subdivision 480 residential lots S11 Part of Lot 5, Con 14 Public Meeting held March 2, 2009. Currently awaiting NVCA C. Andersen 2008 -SUB- (Medonte), East side and other agency comments. Applicant has submitted revised 01 & 2008 - ZBA -13, of Hw12, south of plan, Twp is waiting for comments from agencies. Applicant to Warminster Sideroad, proceed with cost sharing with other developers in Warminster. 22 residential lots Subsequent staff report to proceed to PAC for consideration regarding subdivision and zoning amendment applications. S12 Rezoning from A /RU Council approved Zoning By -law and Draft Plan on October 8, James & Kimberley to R1 Zone, and Plan 2008. Applicant to proceed with clearing Draft Plan Conditions. Drury, D 12 (06), D 14 of Subdivision for 21 (06), 2006 - SUB -02, 2006- lot residential ZBA -04, Conc. 5, West subdivision Part Lot 11 (Oro) -5- Page 47 of 87 Current Development Applications Township of Oro- Medonte 0 Page 48 of 87 Agenda Item # 8a) - Tom Kurtz, correspondece dated May 20, 2009 and corresponden... D--u V%_ r -. Y�\ (_ tAA � - n ges l -- - -- vi 1911 1a1 mwaayc - - - -- From: Tom Kurtz To: Hough, Ralph Cc: Leigh, Andria ; Crawford, John ; Coutanche, Mel ; Hough, Ralph ; Hughes, Harry ; Evans, Dwight; Agnew, Sandy; Allison, Terry; Tom Kurtz ; mary ofarrell bowers ; larry tupling ; roy hastings ; Linda S. Babulic Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2009 8:57 PM Subject: PAC Meeting May 25 Agenda I have reviewed the agenda for the PAC meeting and have the following comments: a) Item 9a should be deleted as their has not been an SPC meeting since our last PAC meeting. The next meeting is on May 28th. b) Item 9b appears to be simply a presentation and or discussion of the summer meeting schedule rather than any meat for discussion on what needs to be looked at as we move forward with the OP review. PAC's main raison d'etre is the OP review and although we have repeatedly asked since the inception of the current PAC for items related to that to be on the agenda, nothing meaningful has yet come forward. c) It is hoped that the item 7c will include a detailed land budget with respect to the areas of future development. This request was made at the last meeting. d) Items 7a and 7b are adjustments to existing zoning and, according to the staff reports, "conform to the general intent of the Official Plan and the provisions of the Zoning By -law ". These items should therefore not take up the time of PAC but should rather be dealt with by the Committee of Adjustment with input, in the case of 7a, from OMEGA. I therefore propose that these items be dropped from the agenda. e) I have gone to the O -M website to prepare for the public meeting on the 27th with respect to the proposal to consider alternative methods of delivery of environmental services in the northern portion of the township currently serviced by NVCA and SSEA. I found detail to be lacking and could only suspect that much more background detail is available which has not been shared with PAC. My suspicions were confirmed by a visit to the NVCA website where far more detail is revealed for public understanding of the issue prior to calling a public meeting of their own in June. This is one of the few issues that have emerged that clearly has a major impact on planning in the municipality and yet PAC was not consulted prior to the issue escalating to the Mining and Lands Commissioner and subsequently to the public for their input. As we are looked to for comment whenever there is a public meeting, it would be helpful if we were appropriately briefed prior to the public meeting. As the recommendations above will free up significant time on Monday's agenda I request that representatives of Council and /or staff and a representative from NVCA be asked to bring us up to speed on this issue. Tom Kurtz Page 49 of 87 Agenda Item # 8a) - Tom Kurtz, correspondece dated May 20, 2009 and corresponden... Subject: FW: PAC Meeting May 25 Agenda From: Linda Babulic To: Tom Kurtz ; Hough, Ralph Cc: Leigh, Andria; Crawford, John; Coutanche, Mel; Hough, Ralph; Hughes, Harry; Evans, Dwight; Agnew, Sandy; Allison, Terry; mary ofarrell bowers • ; larry tupling <larry.tupling• roy hastings sent: Thu May 2109:27:012009 Subject: RE: PAC Meeting May 25 Agenda Hi Ralph, I agree with Tom. I would like to see these changes to the agenda. Linda Linda Babulic 1 Page 50 of 87 tvu On Wednesday, May 27th at the Township Offices Beginning at 7:00 PM Oro - Medonte is Holding a Public Meeting to Seek Input On Options for the Delivery of Environmental Services Within the Severn Sound Watershed BACKGROUND- Please Refer to maD There are three Watersheds in Oro - Medonte 1. Lake Simcoe- served by the Lake Simcoe Conservation Authority (LSRCA) 2. Nottawasaga Watershed- served by the Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority (NVCA) 3. Severn Sound Watershed- Served by both the Severn Sound Environmental Association (SSEA) and the NVCA In addition all three watersheds have environmental initiatives funded by the Township of Oro - Medonte FUNDING: Each Agency has different funding approaches that vary in relation to: The amount charged for services, the options open to the funding municipalities and their financial reporting systems. The Primary Focus for this Public Meeting is the Severn Sound Watershed Area that makes up 53% of area of Oro - Medonte. THE TOTAL AMOUNT ORO- MEDONTE PAYS FOR ENVIROMENTAL SERVICES TO AGENCIES IS $255,932. Permit Fees are also paid by residents and the municipality. Severn Sound Subwatersheds within the Township of Oro- Medonte �a NVCA'$ 5;434, i �R SSEA.$19,146.00 5W.49 T $ K + Permit Fq Fie Wu9lnxp -NVCA . $ 50,086.1 +Permit Fees . L9RCA Legend Ps o TO DATE THE TOWNSHIP HAS BEEN UNABLE TO RESOLVE ISSUES IN THE SEVERN SOUND PORTION OF THE TOWNSHIP RELATING TO: ♦ The Funding of Duplicate Environmental Services by the NVCA and SSEA in the Severn Sound Watershed ♦ Accountability of the services provided for the funding ♦ Duplication of Planning Services and Programs ♦ NVCA budget increases that have averaged more than 14% annually An executive summary that provides additional information including some options for consideration can be accessed on the Township Website www.oro - medonte.ca under the heading News and Announcements. ti 00 0 L0 (}1-){� V/ /c6 CL Agenda Item # 8a) - Tom Kurtz, correspondece dated May 20, 2009 and corresponden... STAFF REPORT Date: May 8, 2009 Meeting No.: 05/09 To: The Chair and Members of the Board of Directors From: Wayne R. Wilson, CAO /Secretary Treasurer Subject: Oro - Medonte /NVCA May 4109 meeting Meeting Purpose Joint staff meeting to review the public meeting process proposed by Robin Dunn CAO Oro - Medonte (appendix 1) and to review options for addressing the expressed concerns of Oro - Medonte for removal of NVCA services, as per the Mediation Resolution (Appendix 1) and as per direction of the NVCA Executive Committee. (NOTE THE DISCUSSION INVOLVES ONLY THE SEVERN PORTION OF ORO- MEDONTE WITHIN NVCA) NVCA staff (Wayne Wilson, CAO /Secretary- Treasurer, Glenn Switzer, Director of Engineering, Chris Hibberd, Director of Planning and Barb Perreault, Senior Enforcement Officer) met with Robin Dunn, CAO and Andria Leigh, Oro - Medonte Director of Development Services on May 4/09. The following is a brief summary of the meeting results. NVCA staff noted that the NVCA Executive had passed the following resolution: Executive Committee Number 06/09 MOVED BY.• Fred Nix SECONDED BY.- Rick Archdekin WHEREAS: The NVCA representatives at the April 8, 2009 mediation meeting at the office of the Ontario Mining and Lands Commissioner a reed`that the Oro - Medonte representatives on the NVCA Board should put a resolution before the Board recommending that the NVCA boundaries be re -drawn back to their original watershed basis; therefore BE IT RESOLVED THAT: 1. Staff send out a public notice requesting public deputations to the .tune Board meeting. 2. Staff prepare a report outlining how the Generic Regulation #172106 Development, Interference with Wetlands and Alteration to Shorelines and Watercourses would be enforced and how other conservation services would be supported in the event that the boundaries were re- drawn; and 3. That staff prepare a joint report with Oro - Medonte with details as to how the boundaries could be re -drawn and what criteria are to be used to determine if clause (1) and (2) are satisfied. Page 52 of 87 Agenda Item # 8a) - Tom Kurtz, correspondece dated May 20, 2009 and corresponden... STAFF REPORT Board of Directors 05/09 Oro - Medonte update — meeting May 4/09 Some concern was expressed by Oro - Medonte staff as to why the NVCA wanted its own June 12/09, public input session, and a separate NVCA staff report. It was made clear that the BOD would find the direct public input and NVCA staff report helpful in reviewing the request to remove /amend the NVCA services /area of jurisdiction. It was agreed that a joint press release would not be prepared for the Oro - Medonte May 27/09 meeting. NVCA staff requested specific examples of the issue raised regarding the reported poor level of planning and regulations service as claimed by an Oro - Medonte Councillor. No additional specifics on these concerns were provided at this meeting. Options for NVCA service delivery was briefly discussed, see below. Andria Leigh will consider these options as she prepares a draft report for Oro - Medonte Council on May 25/09 for the May 27/09 public meeting. Oro - Medonte staff will present the material to the public. NVCA staff will receive a copy of the report one day before the presentation on May 26/09. Given that NVCA staff will not have an opportunity to thoroughly review the presentation, it was noted /agreed that the presentation would be Oro - Medonte's staff presentation and not a joint NVCA/Oro- Medonte presentation/ report. OPTIONS: a. Status quo, where NVCA maintains full level of CA service as per expansion resolution/ agreement and current budget process/ format. Within this option NVCA and Oro - Medonte would agree to require SSEA to develop an MOU with NVCA to ensure efficient delivery of services. b. Core Service Delivery MOU developed between NVCA and Oro - Medonte describing core programs (not optional) such as Regulations and Planning and Flood Program, and Special Benefiting (optional) for Stewardship etc, similar to the Lake Simcoe CA model. c. NVCA and Severn Sound Environmental Association (SSEA) and Oro - Medonte, enter into an MOU agreement regarding delivery of core and special benefiting services. Consider contracting range of environmental services via SSEA (Oro - Medonte) subject to capacity and program, efficiencies. Page 53 of 87 Agenda Item # 8a) - Tom Kurtz, correspondece dated May 20, 2009 and corresponden... STAFF REPORT Board of Directors 05/09 Oro - Medonte update — meeting May 4/09 d. NVCA deliver only Planning and Regulations program including Flood Program (hazard prevention) in the interim, while Oro - Medonte and SSEA develop capacity and legal mechanism /approval to deliver Environmental protection (Generic regulations). e. Conservation Authority area of jurisdiction removed. L NVCA provide only the services as subcontracted back to the Oro - Medonte under a service agreement. ii. NVCA completely remove all service delivery and not subcontract any services. Oro - Medonte (SSEA ?) fully responsible for delivery of regulations/ environmental protection, natural hazard and natural heritage protection and associated liabilities. Other options per public /member input? Note: option (c) may and options (d) and (e) above will require MNR/Provincial approval and or legislative change such as Order in Council. This is subject to further legal opinion and Provincial direction. NEXT STEPS: subject to Board direction. 1. Public input sessions to be held May 27/09 (Oro - Medonte) and June 12/09 (NVCA Board of Directors meeting). Staff to compile public input. 2. Staff from Oro - Medonte and NVCA will prepare a joint report for appropriate Council or Board as per the Mediation Resolution, looking at the pros and cons etc. of the above noted options. In Addition NVCA staff are to jointly develop criteria to show how the Regulations and other Conservation service requirements are addressed, (as per Executive direction). NVCA staff will prepare a staff report regarding how the CA Regulations, and other Conservation Services would be addressed in the event the boundaries were redrawn as requested by Oro - Medonte, for NVCA Board consideration. As per Executive direction. 4. It is anticipated that the above reports would require at least May and June to develop and thus would not be available for Board consideration until the August Board of Directors meeting (given that there is no scheduled Board meeting for July). Respectfully submitted; Wayne R. Wilson CAO /Secretary Treasurer Attachments (2) Page 54 of 87 Agenda Item # 8a) - Tom Kurtz, correspondece dated May 20, 2009 and corresponden... File No. CA 001 -09 THE CONSERVATION AUTHORITIES ACT IN THE MATTER OF f' An appeal to the Mining and Lands 6ommissioner under subsection 27(8) of the Conservation Authorities Act by The Corporation of the Township of Oro - Medonte, against the 2009 General Levy Assessment of the Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority, approved the 13th day of February, 2009. BETWEEN: THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO- MEDONTE (OM) Appellant - and - NOTTAWASAGA VALLEY CONSERVATION AUTHORITY (NVCA) Respondent MEDIATION RESOLUTION Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority representatives hereby request that The Corporation of the Township of Oro - Medonte put a resolution before the Board of the Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority to alter the "Oro - Medonte" boundaries back to their "original watershed basis" subject to: 1.) An appropriate process (as identified in 42 below) being agreed to by both the Executive of the NVCA and OM. 2.) The process shall include: - a joint staff report from the NVCA Staff and OM Township Staff with details and recommendations that return the watershed boundaries to their pre -2002 status. - Appropriate public consultation with ratepayers in OM to occur on the 27e day of May, 2009. 3.) The NVCA will make a representation to the Minister of Natural Resources and include limited representation from OM Council at the meeting currently scheduled for the 27h day of April, 2009. 4.) The parties hereby agree that the OM appeal (as referenced above) be adjourned sine die. Dated in Toronto, this 8a' day of April, 2009. Daniel Edward Pascoe, a Commissioner, etc., Province of Ontario, for the Government of Ontario, Mining and Lands (ommisdoner. Expires May l 1, 2010. Walter Benott5 half o Daniel E.. Pascoe Registrat/Madiator NEC Page 55 of 87 Agenda Item # 8a) - Tom Kurtz, correspondece dated May 20, 2009 and corresponden... Appendix 2 Email from Robin Dunn, CAO Oro - Medonte Wayne Sorry we keep missing each other with voice mails. Thank you for your suggested meeting dates. Unfortunately both Andria & I are out of the office for most of next week so the only timing that looks like it can work is early the week of May 41h I hope that your schedule will permit us to connect at the Township office on Monday May 4th from 10:30- 12:00. In keeping with the process outlined in our mediation resolution, I propose that we focus on the following discussion points in bold; Public Meeting Notice & Background /Executive Summary Statement In preparation for the May 27th Public Meeting, Oro - Medonte staff will present to Oro - Medonte Council at their meeting of May 6th the Public Meeting notice. It was suggested during our mediation deliberations that a joint press release could go out to coincide with the public meeting notice. Discussion - messaging for the press release. A background /executive summary statement should also be available for members of the public at the time we post the public meeting notice. Andria is currently working on a background /executive summary statement. Review - high level background /executive summary. Public Meeting Presentation Andria will prepare a presentation for the public meeting outlining service delivery options for the Severn Sound Water Shed of the Township currently serviced by the NVCA. Discussion Point - key messages & suggested options. We plan to review the draft presentation with members of Council the evening of May 25th and would be pleased to share with you the presentation on Tuesday, May 26tH Review - draft presentation. The Presentation will take place on Wednesday, May 27th as a public meeting at our regular Council session at 7:00 pm. Input from the meeting participants will be tabulated during the first two weeks of June with work on a draft of the joint report. Page 56 of 87 Agenda Item # 8a) - Tom Kurtz, correspondece dated May 20, 2009 and corresponden... Joint Report & Recommendations Joint report and recommendations will be finalized by the NVCA & Oro - Medonte after public consultation & input. Review - consolidation of the draft joint report. Anticipate the final draft of the report should be finalized and presented to the NVCA Board & Oro - Medonte Council for consideration by the end of June. Staff sign off - final draft joint report. Robin Dunn Chief Administrative Officer Township of Oro - Medonte I�`iasr,t k'? +:r:tgge l�.xzi�a!r�� fReti�rr P' 487 -2171 R (705) 487-0133 48 Line 7s, Box 100 Oro, Ontario LOL !X0 www.oro- medonite,ca From: Wayne R.. Wilson [mailto:wwilson @nvca.on.ca] Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 9:57 AM To: Dunn, Robin Cc: Coutanche, Mel; Hough, Ralph; Walter Benotto; Joan Sutherland; Laurie Barron Subject: Oro - Medonte NVCA meeting Robin As a follow up to our earlier phone calls and voice messages. Please let me know what are good times for you and your appropriate staff to meet with NVCA staff to develop a strategy (who does what, timelines and initiate the report, at least a table of contents, etc.) to develop the " appropriate process" staff report referenced in the Mediation Resolution. Good meeting dates for me are; April 23 ( after 2pm ) or the 29th, 30th (available all day). While I look forward to working on this project with you and your staff, I have concern with the tight timelines of trying to get the process report prepared and approved by the NVCA Executive and Oro - Medonte in time for the May 27th public meeting, these are very tight timelines. We need to review what the options are. Can we defer the meeting ?? , fast tract approval ?? other suggestions. Looking forward to your recommendations /input on this matter. Sincerely Wayne R. Wilson Chief Administrative Officer, Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority, John Hix Conservation Administration Centre, Page 57 of 87 v c0 m M 00 0 h 00 Comparison of NVCA/SSEA Services and Costs for Severn Sound Watershed area of Oro- Medonte, February, 2009 Function/ NVCA NV to SSEA SSEto Service Description Description Comment O-M O-M Charge backs based on As requested by Planning — proposal complexity — Township Regulations and hourly rates to be Plan Review confirmed for 2009 None at present Regulatory 0.0 Enforcement Costs part of Agt with LSRCA — provincial Source Water funding 0.0 Protection Flood warning in areas not covered by CA done Flood and Erosion by MNR 0.0 Hazard Management Funding for our Healthy Streams Pgm comes from Healthy Waters MNR and others 0.0 Stewardship pgms such as Well Aware, Natural 0.0 44 Stewardship/ Shorelines, Take -a- little- P Forestry Services lead -out, Tree s Distribution Pgm are funded from others c0 cD D v m 00 v 0 E N n 0 CD 0 D Q CD n CD Q v CD Q 0 0 `< � N (D O cn � N 0 0 CD a) 5 v c� m O h OD .»' °= ''•';,*'± 4 a.X x..�;, fIr" s; a� cc CD D v CD 00 v O E N n O CD O D Q CD n cD Q v CD Q- 0 O `< � N CD o � N O O QL CD CD a) Monitoring of stream stations funded by others Environmental including MOE. Special 0.0 Monitoring monitoring surveys (e.g. Bass Lake) would be a specific request to Twp in art Monitoring wells installed Groundwater and sampled under the 0.0 Monitoring Prov. Groundwater Monit. Network by Agt with MOE N/A Land Acquisition/ 0.0 Management SSEA staff work with Education schools or interest grps on 0.0 part of base Services ed , awareness & outreach funding — funding from others Was funded Sustainability Staff time if Council through FCM- Plan wishes to participate on Municipal Agt — implementation Steering Committee in 2008 Twp 2009 portion $5,170 2009 budget from Oro- $19,144 Financial - Medonte supports SSEA Budgeting, base Accountability Severn SSEA staff plus See above Staff short-term contracts Compliment .»' °= ''•';,*'± 4 a.X x..�;, fIr" s; a� cc CD D v CD 00 v O E N n O CD O D Q CD n cD Q v CD Q- 0 O `< � N CD o � N O O QL CD CD a) v cQ (D M O O h 00 Joint projects that may involve the Twp will arise with specific funding requests being Other made at budget time. Participation in these Considerations projects will be decided by the Twp cc (D v (D 00 v O E N n O (D O Q (D n (D Q 9 (D Q- 0 � O � N (D O (n - N O O Z3 O Q (D Q Map Number Owner Total Units Single Detached Semi- Detached Townhouses Apartment Built Area (Hectares) Approved Development 1 Homire Development 28 28 15.77 2 Andersen Development 22 22 6.07 3 Thatcher 21 21 8.47 4 Drury 15 15 9.02 5 Stonehedge 7 7 6.07 6 Kellwat 97 97 20.82 7 Houben 26 26 17.5 8 Country Lane Estates 22 22 20.8 9 Moon Point 14 14 25.01 10 Lake Simcoe Aeropark 77 85.8 11 Buffalo Springs 230 230 185.63 12 Keyzer 55 55 31.7 13 Horseshoe Timber Ridge 250 250 27.92 14 Johnson Construction 30 30 37.7 15 CRA Developments 6 6 9.3 16 Goosens 3 3 4.2 17 UCCI 40 40 110.51 18 Diamond Valley 137 137 59 19 Capobianco (Sabiston) 83 83 51.85 20 Crooks 7 7 1.4 21 HRC Lifestyle 480 480 85.3 22 Craighurst - - 36 23 11198677 Ontario Ltd. 4 4 6.17 24 IHawkestone Expansion - - 1 146.9 Draft Approved Development Application for Development Page 61 of 87 Designated Rural Settlement Area Map Number Community Land Area Designated Land Area guilt U ( P) Designated with Application for Development Designated with No Application 1 Guthrie 59.2 59.2 - - 2 Shanty Bay 185.6 156.4 - 29.2 3 Oro Station 28.7 21.5 - 7.2 4 Forest Home 20.1 20.1 - - 5 East Oro 23.3 13.35 1.4(20) 8.55 6 Edgar 43.6 15.4 9.02(4) 19.18 7 Rugby 11.2 8.33 - 2.87 8 Craighurst 77 27 4 9 Jarratt 14.8 5.2 - 9.6 10 Warminster 142.2 46.6 53.5 (1,2,12) 42.1 11 Moonstone 111.14 81.04 8.47(3) 21.63 12 Prices Corners 55.32 46.8 - 8.52 13 Sugarbush 258.25 174.4 83.85 (18,19) - 14 Horseshoe 152 152 Hawkestone Residential Area 15 Hawkestone 57.6 57.6 - Total Land Area (Hectares) 1240.01 884.92 156.24 188.85 Page 62 of 87 Designated Rural Residential Lands Map Number Land Area Designated Land Area (Built up) Designated With Application for Development Designated with No Application 1 58.9 53 - 5.9 2 39.1 39.1 - - 3 10.1 10.1 - - 4 32.5 32.5 - - 5 167.8 160.88 - 6.92 6 16.9 16.9 - - 7 8.2 8.2 8 70.2 70.2 - - 9 17.8 - - 17.8 10 16.8 16.8 - - 11 5.26 5.26 - - 12 35.2 17.7 17.5(7) - 13 17.8 17.8 - - 14 15.7 15.7 - - 15 20.8 - 20.8(8) - 16 6 6 17 6.2 6.2 - - 18 14.3 - 6.07(5) 8.23 Total Land Area (Hectares) 559.56 476.34 44.37 38.85 Designated Residential Lands (Buffalo Springs) 1 (11) 185.63 - 185.63 (11) - Designated Airport Lands 1 258.8 - - - Page 63 of 87 Industrial Lands (Developed) Land Area Location 56.3 Line 1 /Highway 11 21.97 Line 4 /Highway 11 55.5 Line 14 /Highway 11 60.74 Line 15 /Highway 11 Total Land Area (Hectares) 194.51 21.5 Industrial Lands (Undevelop Map Number 1 Land Area (Hectares) 85.8 2 35.1 3 8.5 4 22.8 Total Land Area 2.5 152.2 Commercial Lands (Developed) 1.9 Highway 11 28.8 6.8 60.84 1.7 0.4 5.8 0.4 2.5 5.6 Highway 12 21.5 Horseshoe Total Land Area 136.24 1 Hectares Commercial Lands (Undevel Horseshoe Valley 1 52.92 2 11.15 3 2.5 Total Land Area 66.57 Page 64 of 87 L8 ;o S9 abed YWk Reg7on April 24, 2009 Mr. Glen R. Knox County Clerk Corporation of the County of Simcoe Administration Centre 1110 Highway 26 Midhurst, Ontario LOL 1 XO Dear Mr. Knox: Re: The Proposed Lake Simcoe Protection Plan Regional Clerk's Office Corporate Services Department K -CEWr) APR 28W Regional Council, at its meeting held on Thursday, April 23, 2009, adopted the following recommendations of the Transportation and Works Committee regarding the report entitled "The Proposed Lake Simcoe Protection Plan": 1. Regional Council endorse the attached staff comments on Environmental Bill of Rights (EBR) posting 010 -4636 as submitted on March 16, 2009. 2. The Regional Clerk forwards this report to the Honourable John Gerretsen, Minister of Environment. The Regional Clerk forwards this report to the following stakeholders: a) Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority b) The Township of King and the Towns of Aurora, East Gwillimbury, Georgina, Newmarket and Whitchurch- Stouffville c) The Building Industry and Land Development (BILD) York Chapter d) The County of Simcoe e) The Regional Municipality of Durham A copy of Clause No. 3, Report No. 4 of the Transportation and Works Committee, is enclosed for your information. OaA, The Regional Municipality of York. 17250 Yonge Street. Newmarket. Ontario UY 6Z1 Tel: 905- 830 -4444 Ext. 1320, 1 -877- 464 -9675, Fax: 905 -895 -3031 Internet: www.york.ca ti 00 4— 0 (1) cn Please contact Laura McDowell, Director of Environmental Promotion and Protection, 905- 830 -4444, ext. 5077, if you have any questions with respect to this matter. Sincerely, Denis Kelly Regional Clerk B. Bridle Attachment Copy to: Commissioner of Environmental Services Commissioner of Planning and Development Services ti CO O ti N O1 Cu 0- Clause No. 3 in Report No. 4 of the Transportation and Works Committee was adopted, without amendment, by the Council of The Regional Municipality of York at its meeting on April 23, 2009. 3 THE PROPOSED LAKE SIMCOE PROTECTION PLAN The Transportation and Works Committee recommends: 1. Receipt of. the presentation by Phil Brennan, Senior Manager and Steven Borg, Senior Policy Advisor, Lake Simcoe Project, Ministry of the Environment; 2. Receipt of the communication from Carolyn Lance, Administrative Assistant to the Town Clerk, Town of Georgina, dated March 9, 2009, regarding `Draft Lake Simcoe Protection Plan, Environmental Bill of Rights Registry (EBR) Number 010 - 4636'; and 3. Adoption of the recommendations contained in the following report dated March 25, 2009, from the Commissioner of Environmental Services and the Commissioner of Planning and Development Services. RECOMMENDATIONS It is recommended that: 1. Regional Council endorse the attached staff comments on Environmental Bill of Rights (EBR) posting 010 -4636 as submitted on March 16, 2009. 2. The Regional Clerk forwards this report to the Honourable John Gerretsen, Minister of Environment. The Regional Clerk forwards this report to the following stakeholders: a) Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority b) The Township of King and the Towns of Aurora, East Gwillimbury, Georgina, Newmarket and Whitchurch- Stouffville c) The Building Industry and Land Development (BILD) York Chapter d) The County of Simcoe e) The Regional Municipality of Durham r` 00 0 00 a> 0) cn a Clause No. 3 Report No. 4 Transportation and Works Committee 2. PURPOSE The purpose of this report is to advise Council of the contents of the Draft Lake Simcoe Protection Plan; discuss the implications to York Region and its local municipalities; and obtain Council endorsement of the coordinated comments from York Region and local municipalities submitted to meet the EBR comment deadline of March 16, 2009. 3. BACKGROUND Province proceeds with plan to protect Lake Simcoe water quality and ecological integrity In 2006, the Province of Ontario announced they would introduce legislation to protect Lake Simcoe. On June 17, 2007, Bill 99 - the Proposed Lake Simcoe Protection Act was introduced in the Legislature. A previous report (September 18, 2008, Report No. 8 of the Regional Planning and Economic Development Committee) provided comments to the Province on the EBR posting related to Bill 99. At that time, Regional Council directed staff to continue to monitor Bill 99 and appear before Standing Committee on General Government to articulate the Region's issues. Subsequently, the Commissioner of Environmental Services appeared before Standing Committee on November 19, 2008. The Lake Simcoe Protection Act, 2008 received Royal Assent on December 12, 2008. On January 13, 2009, the Province released the proposed Lake Simcoe Protection Plan and posted it on the EBR (Posting #010 -4636) for a 60 day comment period ending March 16, 2009. 4. ANALYSIS AND OPTIONS York Region has a long and consistent history of supporting the protection of Lake Simcoe York Region has supported the protection and study of Lake Simcoe for many years through the funding of the Lake Simcoe Regional Conservation Authority and participation on the Lake Simcoe Environmental Management Strategy (LSEMS). In addition, York Region has consistently demonstrated our commitment to protecting Lake Simcoe through: r` 00 0 rn 0) M 0- Clause No. 3 Y0r1= k1lo"k, RtA �0�Xe �G �IUwya�� Report No. 4 T° so3 �,��;,+ Transportation and Works Committee ' 1 • A commitment to utilizing "drinking water quality" equivalent membrane treatment technology at the Region's Keswick Water Pollution Control Plant in addition to other environmental enhancements already implemented such as accreditation to the ISO 14001 environmental management system standard. ' Continuously operating our Water Pollution Control Plants at/or beyond compliance to ensure enhanced protection of the Lake. �) • Developing necessary background and scientific information through the Lake Simcoe Environmental Management Study (LSEMS). �� • Submitting a funding request to the Lake Simcoe Clean-Up Fund to develop a Regional Phosphorus Management Strategy to evaluate and address cumulative impacts of Phosphorus loadings from within York Region boundaries. Province should be commended for a comprehensive document that supports many environmental initiatives currently approved in York Region The propose(LLake Simcoe Protection Plan LSPP) supports many of the environmental initiatives currently approved in York Region as part of the Oak Ridges Moraine, Greenbelt and Growth plans. The proposed Lake Simcoe Protection Plan requires adjacent communities to undertake similar water conservation and use reduction strategies that York Region has promoted, with the Water for Tomorrow program. The environmental goals set out in the proposed Plan for improving watershed quality are commendable. York Region staff, representatives from local municipalities and other stakeholders met to discuss common key issues As part of the comments submitted in response to the EBR Posting #010 -4636, York Region staff had specific comments related to the following: l • Impact of the proposed Lake Simcoe Protection Plan on York Region's ability to service the northern portion of the region, achieve the Growth Plan requirements and provide for the development of complete communities. )) • Funding to support implementation of the Lake Simcoe Protection Plan. \ • Capacity of various stakeholders in the Lake Simcoe Protection Plan to deliver on the �) extensive and aggressive work plan. 4) • Municipal requirements will be costly and are presently unfunded. Attachment I to this report contains detailed comments forwarded to the Ministry of Environment in response to the EBR posting and its March 10h, 2009 deadline. ti co 0 0 ti a� 0) M 0- Clause No. 3 Report No. 4 Transportation and Works Committee Lake Simcoe Protection Plan `Water Quality' initiatives target sewage treatment plants and stormwater management The `Water Quality' section of the proposed Lake Simcoe Protection Plan focuses on sewage treatment, stormwater management, subsurface sewage treatment, scientific water quality monitoring and research, phosphorus reduction strategy, and construction and mineral aggregate resource activities. The proposed Lake Simcoe Protection Plan seeks to impose stricter controls on sewage treatment plants including development of long -term loading caps for individual plants on the Lake and seeks to require effluent characterization of each plant in the basin. Upon the revocation of O.Reg. 60/08, no new municipal sewage treatments will be approved on the Lake and any non - municipal sewage treatment plant that is proposed will be required to demonstrate a net reduction in phosphorus to the Lake. The proposed plan also commits to evaluating the feasibility of a Water Quality Trading program for the basin. Stormwater management is also emphasized heavily in this section of the plan. Municipalities will be required to conduct stormwater master plans within five years of the plan's declaration. The proposed Lake Simcoe Protection Plan also suggests that re tri fit mgrams for the existing stormwater infrastructure should be developed prior to j the completion of the master plans. The plan proposes no new subsurface sewage treatment systems or works be permitted within 100 metres of the Lake Simcoe shoreline. All existing on -site sewage systems r within 100 metres of the Lake Simcoe shoreline or any permanent stream of Lake Simcoe will be required to be re- inspected through a regulation proposed under the Building Code Act (1992). interim Phosphorus regulation will be extended beyond March 31, 2009 The Province has approached York Region regarding extension of the Interim Regulation Ontario Regulation 60/08 beyond the current deadline of March 31, 2009. York Region staff have been working with the Province to consider a jurisdictional limit to apportion flexibly to each of the five York Region sewage treatment facilities in Holland Landing, Mount Albert, Schomberg, Sutton and Keswick. This approach would also satisfy servicing needs by permitting the Region to maximize specific site efficiencies, while facilitating operational flexibility. ti 00 0 ti a� cu rl CIause No. 3 Report No. 4 Transportation and Works Committee Gains in phosphorus reduction will be realized if regulations focus on large contributors The proposed Lake Simcoe Protection Plan indicates that the major contributions of phosphorus within the Lake Simcoe basin are from atmospheric deposition (33 %) and urban and rural inflow drainage (37 %). Currently, emphasis in the proposed Lake Simcoe Protection Plan is to more closely regulate sewage treatment plants and develop additional reduction programs and targets. It should be noted that sewage treatment plants contribute a small amount (7 %) of the phosphorus to the watershed. York Region staff recommends stronger regulatory controls be placed on the larger sources of phosphorus in the basin; there should be consistent application of the right instruments to increase phosphorus reduction in the lake. Emphasis on Water Quality trading in the Lake Simcoe Protection Plan should be considered a viable option for phosphorus reduction The practice of water quality trading allows the reduction of phosphorus at a point source. Water quality trading would provide for a decrease of phosphorus prior to entering a treatment plant. York Region has applied for funding from the Lake Simcoe Clean-up Fund to begin identifying sources of phosphorus, together with the local municipalities, prior to it reaching the plant. Currently, the Lake Simcoe Protection Plan only commits to researching the concept of water quality trading within the first year of implementation. York Region recommends an effective program for water quality trading should be developed and a pilot undertaken within one year. York Region staff also suggest hat the program could be piloted within the region. Plan seeks to build on existing work through Source Protection committees and Clean Water Act (2006) The Clean Water Act (2006) has mandated formation of Source Protection Committees throughout the province and a number of specific technical projects within each watershed. The proposed Lake Simcoe Protection Plan will work through the water budget process to develop flow targets for stressed watersheds and subwatersheds in Lake Simcoe. The p oposed Lake Simcoe Protection Plan will also require municipalities on the lake ' without water conservation and efficiency master plans to develop them within five years 1 of the plan coming into effect. York Region's award winning, `Water for Tomorrow' ` program satisfies water conservation and efficiency requirements stipulated in the proposed Plan. r` 00 0 N r` a� co Clause No. 3 6 Report No. 4 Transportation and Works Committee Proposed Lake Simcoe Protection Plan requires significant work be undertaken by the Province and all stakeholders The proposed Lake Simcoe Protection Plan represents one of the most labour intensive Provincial initiatives in recent history. The Plan itself represents a monumental and necessary undertaking; the associated work plan to accomplish goals set out in the proposed Plan over the next three years is extremely aggressive for all stakeholders. Within the first three years, stakeholders including the Province (including the Ministry of the Environment, the Ministry of Natural Resources and the Ministry of Energy and Infrastructure) and the Lake Simcoe Conservation Authority are committed to 'undertaking 36 studies. Municipalities are committed to three studies within the first five years. Any deviations from this timetable could delay additional elements of the plan. Given current fiscal limitations and projections of deficits in Provincial funding, there is a serious possibility that the proposed timetable may be impacted. Based on experiences with other Provincial Plans, including the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan, the Greenbelt Plan, and the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, the Province and other stakeholders may not have the necessary finance and human resources to fully deliver the initiatives proposed in the first five years of the Plan. It would be more feasible for the Province to extend some of the timeframes and/or consider additional funding to manage some of these challenges. Relationship to Vision 2026 The proposed Lake Simcoe Protection Plan continues to support the strong tradition that York Region has demonstrated in support of programs that protect the health of Lake Simcoe. More specifically, in Vision 2026, Coal 2 `Enhanced Environment, Heritage and Culture — Securing A Green York Region' commits to the protection of sensitive features including Lake Simcoe. 5. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS Long -term financial commitment is vital to the success of the Lake Simcoe Protection Plan The proposed Lake Simcoe Protection Plan acknowledges that funding has been a concern to all stakeholders. Estimates for Lake Simcoe Protection Plan implementation in the first 10 years is upwards of $135 million, exclusive of municipal costs estimated at $120 million for stormwater management and $105 million for sewage treatment plant upgrades. The total estimate for project planned in the first 10 years of the Plan implementation is $360 million dollars. York Region staff have recommended that the Province and Federal government consider an endowment structure of $500 million over r` 00 0 M r` (D 0) cu 0- Clause No. 3 Report No. 4 Transportation and Works Committee 10 years to allocate sustainable funding over a long -tern perfod for the implementation of the Plan. This would allow for roughly $36 million dollars per year to be contributed to the Plan implementation. The Province has currently committed $20 million over four years with a focus on providing assistance to farmers to encourage agricultural best management practices, scientific research, monitoring, and administrative support. There is no indication whether this commitment is a one time commitment or ongoing funding support. There is also no mention of the $30 million Federal contribution through PROPEL funding and it's place in future implementation. 6. LOCAL MUNICIPAL IMPACT Stormwater Management and Septic System re- inspections present some concerns for affected local municipalities York Region staff have met with representatives of local municipalities affected by the proposed Lake Simcoe Protection Plan. The proposed Plan will pose 'a significant impact at the local level from a workload and financial perspective. The proposed Lake Simcoe Protection Plan places a large emphasis on formalizing and upgrading stormwater management practices; Is estimated that this requirement alone Will cost municipalities upwards of $100,000 to $150,00010 complete in accordance with Municipal Class EA process. Retrofitting existing stormwater management infrastructure will likely be in the millions of dollars. A proposal that local municipalities will be responsible for on -site sewage inspection and certification programs will also tax local governments beyond existing resources. Town of Georgina staff have suggested the focus of this program should be on older systems (beyond 10 to 15 years of age) as these systems are more likely to have issues that will more effectively reduce phosphorus from this source. Cost for the re- inspection program is also a major concern to local municipalities. It has been suggested that the cost of rc- inspection and any remedial actions or works should be bom by the individual landowners, potentially with a Provincial incentive program. ti co 0 ti a� M 0- Clause No. 3 8 Report No. 4 Transportation and Works Committee 7. CONCLUSION The proposed Lake Simcoe Protection Plan supports many of the environmental initiatives currently approved in York as part of the Oak Ridges Moraine, Greenbelt and Growth Plans. Additionally, it builds on work that is already being undertaken by the Province in other initiatives such as the Clean Water Act (2006) and development of provincial water conservation programs. York Region has an extensive history in support of Lake Simcoe Conservation Authority and its continued excellence in the protection of the Lake and the protection of the lake as a whole. The Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority should take an active role in the implementation of the Lake Simcoe Protection Plan. Sewage treatment plants are small contributors of phosphorus to the basin. As such, regulatory instruments should be developed and applied to large sources of phosphorus to affect the most gain in phosphorus reduction in Lake Simcoe. The Province should give additional consideration to the aggressive workplan for all stakeholders within the proposed Lake Simcoe Protection Plan and establish long -term funding sources to ensure success. For more information on this report, please contact Laura McDowell, Director, Environmental Promotion and Protection Branch, Environmental Services at ext.5077. The Senior Management Group has reviewed this report. (The attachment referred to in this clause is attached to this report.) I- 00 0 LO r` a� 0) M 0- COUNCIL ATTACHMENT 1 Cle9'`dr iav cftmntSmim March 13, 2009 Ms. Liz Unikel Senior Policy Coordinator Ministry of the Environment Environmental Programs Division Lake Simcoe Project Team 7a' floor - 55 St.Clair Avenue West Toronto Ontario M4V 2Y7 Subject: Comments on EBR Posting 0104636 — the Draft Lake Simcoe Protection Plan Regional staff and staff of the area municipalities in the Lake Simcoe Watershed in York Region have reviewed the draft Lake Simcoe Protection Plan and wish to commend the Province on an aggressive and comprehensive plan to restore the quality of Lake Simcoe. Background: York Region has a long history of supporting initiatives to improve the quality of Lake Simcoe. Since 1991, York Region has been a member of the Lake Simcoe Environmental Management Strategy (LSEMS). The Region has been involved in multiple endeavours to improve and protect the Lake; including watershed improvement projects through our Greening Program and the Natural Partnership Program with the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority (LSRCA) to provide enhanced technologies and practices in sewage treatment technology. These activities are carried out as part of our normal practices. York Region has also been actively involved over the past 18 months in commenting on key components of this Provincial regulatory initiatives focusing on Lake Simcoe, including: • Providing comments on the Lake Simcoe Discussion paper, the Interim Regulation, Bill 99, and the Lake Simcoe Protection Act • Presenting to the Standing Committee on Bill 99 • Participating in discussions on the extension of Ontario Regulation 60108, the draft Lake Simcoe Protection Plan and the Transition Regulation for the Act r` co 0 r` (D 0) c6 0- Through our involvement in these initiatives, the Region has delivered a consistent message to the Province as follows. Comments on Bill 99 - An Act to protect and restore the ecological health of Lake Simcoe watershed and to amend the Ontario Water Resources Act in respect of Water Quality Trading - September 2008 Regional Council at its meeting of September 18; 2008 endorsed Clause 10 of Report 8 of the Regional Planning and Economic Development Committee, which identified changes required to the proposed Bill 99. The key messages to the Province from this Report included: On -going Regional support for the Lake Simcoe Conservation Authority as the lead agency for this initiative The Region continues to support the Lake Simcoe Conservation Authority as the lead agency for this initiative. This approach will build on their 17 years of LSEMS work and avoid unnecessary duplication with the Authority mandate under the Conservation Authorities Act and the Clean Water Act as well as deliverables required for the Clean Water Act under the Georgian Bay Lake Simcoe Source Protection Committee. • Proposed Lake Simcoe Act and the Plan must recognize that approved growth and future growth required by Places to Grow Plan will occur within the watershed Places to Grow — the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, identifies a York Region 2031 population of 1.5 million people and employment of 800,000 jobs. All municipalities within York Region are bound by requirements of the Places to Grow Plan, including population and employment forecasts. Approximately 69% of York Region is located within the Provincial Greenbelt 00 6"'-4-k (GB) and Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan (ORMCP), an area effectively excluded from accommodating additional growth. In York Region, some of this population and employment growth will occur in the Lake Simcoe watershed in the white -belt in East Gwillimbury and in existing approved settlement areas in Georgina, East Gwillimbury, King, Newmarket, Aurora and Whitchurch- Stouffville. The Lake Simcoe Act and the proposed Plan must recognize this growth. • Recognition and support for achievable wastewater effluent targets and wider, high impact solutions, and water quality trading The Act and the proposed Plan must recognize achievable targets for wastewater effluent quality of sewage treatment plants in the Lake Simcoe watershed and require a broader variety of solutions rather than just controlling phosphorus inputs from wastewater treatment facilities, which account for a very low percentage of the total phosphorus input to the Lake. ti 00 4— O ti ti a� cu York Region is working diligently to provide the highest practicable level of sewage treatment in our plants discharging into the Lake Simcoe watershed, and will support the Ministryy of the Environment's (MOE) efforts to establish a high standard of treatment for all facilities within the Lake Simcoe basin. However, in light of the existing technologies in place at the Region's sewage treatment plants in the watershed, the Region is approaching a level of diminishing returns on investment in the area of sewage treatment technology. Further Ministry requirements placed on our existing approvals may be impractical and difficult to achieve, if not impossible. Prior to lowering Phosphorus limits, Regional staff is of the opinion that significant dialogue is required with the bodies responsible for the approvals. High impact, lower cost solutions to reduce phosphorus inputs to the Lake could include managing and/or treating the Polder Wetlands discharge, investing in agricultural and rural land improvements to deal with atmospheric deposition, r� where possible, with the use of phosphorus locking agents (such as the one undergoing testing by LSRCA in the Newmarket area), assisting municipal urban storm water retrofits in all jurisdictions, and proceeding with water quality trading programs. Standing Committee on General Government November 2009 Regional staff also made representation to Standing Committee of the Legislature at its public hearing on November 19, 2008 with the same key messages. • Continued support for the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority as the lead agency for this initiative to recognize and build on the work and expertise developed by the Authority over the past 18 years and reduce duplication. • Broadening representation on a governing body for the watershed to include, business sectors, First Nations, members of the public and bona -fide environmental groups, but accommodate this through a modified Authority structure. • Provision of long term stable funding for the initiative • Coflaberadon to deliver Phosphorus reductions by addressing and funding reductions by the largest contributors. • Use of jurisdiction based permitting for effluent phosphorus loadings be considered. • Provisions for a viable water quality offsetting program without delay to start capturing opportunities now. In preparing this response to the EBR posting of the Draft Lake Simcoe Protection Plan, Regional staff has benefited from continents from the Town of Georgina, the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority, Durham Region and the Building Industry and I- 00 0 00 I- (D 0) c6 0- Land Development Association - York Chapter. Their submissions raise valid points that must be considered by the Province as it develops this proposal. Key Issues for York Region in the Draft Lake Simcoe Protection Plan: York Region would like to highlight key issues integral to Regional operations and planning, where we believe the Draft Protection Plan must be improved prior to approval. These Key Issues are: C Impact of the Plan on the Region's ability to service north York Region, achieve Growth Plan requirements and provide for development of complete communities 3 % • Fundin�to support Plan implementation 1 9 Capacity of the Province to deliver on the work plan /` • Clarification of applicable policy J • Municipal Requirements will add largely unfunded costs Impact of the Plan on the Region's ability to service north York Region, achieve the Growth Plan requirements and provide for the development of complete communities. As previously indicated, the Growth Plan requires that York Region provide for a population of 1.5 million persons and between 780,000 and 800,000 jobs by 2031. Approximately 69% of York Region is within the Provincial Greenbelt (GB) and Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan (ORMCP) and effectively excluded from additional growth. In York Region, some of this population and employment growth will occur in the Lake Simcoe watershed in the white -belt in East Gwillimbury and in existing approved settlement areas in Georgina, East Gwillimbury, King, Newmarket, Aurora and Whitchurch- Stouffville. Population and employment forecasts for local municipalities in the Lake Simcoe watershed are highlighted in Table 1 below. The ability to service this growth — particularly in Georgina with an additional 26,000 persons and nearly 14,000 jobs by 2031, on Lake Simcoe based sewage treatment plants and the ability to service population and employment growth in East Gwillimbury of 66,000 persons and 26,000 jobs by 2031 are central issues of the Region's comments on this plan. Communities in Georgina are intended to remain on Lake Simcoe based services and the Region is currently pursuing expansions of both the Keswick and Sutton sewage treatment plants. Growth in East Gwillimbury is dependent on the Upper York Servicing System and the Individual Environment Assessment that is currently underway to identify and develop that solution. However, storm water management from this growth is still intended to flow towards Lake Simcoe. r` 00 0 rn r` (D 0) M tZ Table 1 York Region Population and Employment Forecast by Local Municipality in the Lake Simcoe Watershed Municipality 2006 2031 Growth 2006 to 2031 Aurora Population Employment 49,600 20,300 70,400 34,700 20,800 East Gwilllmbury 14,400 Population 21,900 88,000 66,100 Employment Georgina 51900 31,800 25,900 Population 44,500 70,700 26,200 Employment Kingw 8,000 21,700 13,700 Population 20,300 35,100 14,800 Employment 7,100 12,100 5,000 Newmarket Population 77,400 97,300 19,900 Employment Wfill urch- 42,100 49,700 7,600 Stoufi'"llla ., Populat on ' Employment 25,400 60,800 35,400 York Region Totals 10,900 23 700 12,800 Population Employment 929,900 1,507,400 577,500 Households 462,400 69,500 798,700 135,700 336,300 66,200 Source: 2006 househdds based on Statiatcs Canada. 2008 0e11au6. 2008 population based on Stadstics Canada, 2006 Census using an estimated undercount adjustment of 0.1%. 2006 employment based an York Region Planning Dapanmend Survay Data. 2011 to 2031 l0r2Casta provided by York Region planning and Development Services Department. 2008. Note: Figures have been rounded to the nearest hundred Chapter 4 of the draft Lake Simcoe Plan proposes Targets, Indicators and Policies governing water quality from sources including sewage treatment plants, storm water management, agricultural, ntral and urban runoff, subsurface sewage treatment, construction, and aggregate resources. Policies for water quality monitoring and a Phosphorus Reduction Strategy are also considered in this chapter. The majority of the Policies proposed present no issues for the Region as they are a matter of normal practice, except for the phosphorus limits, which are discussed below. Stronger Controls required for Unregulated Phosphorus contributors There are various contributors of phosphorus to the Lake Simcoe basin and that sewage treatment plants represent 7% of total phosphorus contributions. However, much of the control and limits for phosphorus are still being placed on sewage treatment plants. The Region recommends that similar regulatory controls are placed on the larger phosphorus ti 00 4- 0 O 00 N t6 tl contributors in the basin. We believe that by characterizing the magnitude of the contributions and addressing them equally or on a scale, there would be consistent application of the right instruments for the most gain. By reducing some of the larger contributions of phosphorus from the onset, the Province would see the largest returns towards achieving the goal of 44 metric tonnes of phosphorus per year. The draft Lake Simcoe Protection Plan recognizes Growth Plan requirements The Region is pleased to see recognition. in the Phosphorus Reduction Strategy section of the Draft LSPP (Policies 4.25 through 4.28) that phosphorus loading targets will accommodate implementation of the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe and long term phosphorus loading caps for all sewage treatment plants will likewise accommodate population and employment growth allocated to areas pursuant to the Growth Plan. The link between this Protection Plan and the Growth Plan is a key message delivered to the Province in previous Regional comments. To further reinforce links between the two Plans, the Province may wish to consider inclusion of the Growth Plan municipal population and employment forecasts within the Protection Plan once approved as part of our growth management exercises. While acknowledgement of the Growth Plan and phosphorus limits is a step forward for municipal operators and owners of treatment facilities such as York Region, these caps and flow capacities are tied to development of the larger Phosphorus Reduction Strategy for the Lake or specific Lake areas such as Cooks Bay. This Reduction Strategy is proposed to be undertaken within I year of the draft LSPP approval. If this does not occur, or is delayed there are serious implications to the Region and its local municipalities in their ability to achieve the Growth Plan requirements. This issue must be resolved as part of the approval of the Lake Simcoe Plan and the potential extension of Ontario Regulation 60/08. Current total of individual phosphorus loading limits in the Interim Regulation would facilitate approved growth in York Region and foster an overall phosphorus reduction provided that a jurisdictional limit is implemented' Policy 4.26 identifies that MOE is to consult on extending the Interim Regulation and implies that amendments to the caps may be considered, but are not guaranteed. The limits that were imposed under the Interim Regulation (that are currently being revisited) should continue to provide for the growth that has already been approved within an existing area. The Region has undertaken significant initiatives and would like to be recognized for those past successes. We continue to support the notion of a jurisdictional phosphorus limit, based on York Region's Master Plan, that allows for operational flexibility. This approach would also satisfy ultimate servicing needs to 2031 by permitting the Region to maximize specific site efficiencies, while facilitating operational flexibility and manage the systems on a watershed basis. r` 00 4— 0 00 m cts York Region strongly encourages the Province to combine the existing total phosphorus loading limit of York Region STPs outlined in Interim Regulation into a jurisdictional limit. The current limits set out in Interim Regulation already demonstrate a significant drop in phosphorus limits over the existing certificate of approval limits. A jurisdictional limit format combined with the existing total loading limits in the Interim Regulation will also allow for approved development in thb Region to take place to 2031. If a jurisdictional limit is not considered, increased effluent phosphorus limits will be required for the Mount Albert and Sutton Sewage Treatment Plants. Water Quality Trading Program Imperative In upgrading the Region's sewage treatment plants, the Region is approaching a point of diminishing returns. It takes several million dollars of capital expenditure to remove and/or limit small quantities of phosphorus (e.g., in the order of kilograms per year) from discharging into the Lake. An effective water quality trading program could be used to achieve a greater improvement to the Lake for the money spent in sewage treatment plant improvements. The Plan currently contemplates that research will be undertaken within the year following Plan approval. The Region is of the opinion that not only should research be undertaken, but a pilot project must be established within the year. York Region would be pleased to work with the Province to identify and establish a suitable pilot project. Recommendations dealing with Chapter 4 - Water Quality 1. The Plan be amended to apply stronger controls and limitations on unregulated Phosphorus contributors 2. Province to consider inclusion of the municipal Places to Grow population and employment forecasts in the Protection Plan once forecasts are approved as part of our growth management exercises. 3. Permitted phosphorus loadings in 0. Reg. 60/08, if extended, provide sufficient Nxibility to recognize the ultimate projected loadings required to service growth in York Region to 2031. 4. Province move to allocation of Phosphorus caps on a jurisdictional basis as opposed to a plant by plants caps to permit the Region to maximize specific site efficiencies, while facilitating operational flexibility and manage the systems on a watershed basis. Jurisdictional permits should also be considered in conjunction with the extension of O.Reg. 60108. I- 00 0 N 00 (D 0) (U 0- Funding to Support Plan Implementation The draft Lake Simcoe Protection Plan acknowledges that funding issues have been an issue for all stakeholders. The estimates for Plan implementation in the first 10 years range between $100 million and $135 million, exclusive of municipal infrastructure costs of $120 million-for storm water management and $105 million for sewage treatment plant upgrades, with requirements for higher treatment levels to accommodate expected population growth. These figures bring the projected total cost of implementation to over $360 million. The Province's $20 million contribution (over four years) is to focus primarily on providing assistance to fanners to encourage agricultural best management practices, scientific research and monitoring and administrative support for the two additional committees established_ There is no indication whether this is a one time Provincial commitment or ongoing funding support. There is no mention of the $30 million Federal contribution through PROPEL funding and it's place in future implementation. The Plan speaks to innovative funding, partnerships, full cost and user pay principles. However, a comprehensive breakdown of anticipated costs or revenue sources is still unclear as this is not explicitly detailed in the Plan. Regional Finance staff has reviewed the document and have indicated issues with the sustainability of the Plan given the lack of specifics. In the absence of detailed information and given current and anticipated fiscal shortfalls and projected Provincial deficits, we emphasize that unfunded mandates are unlikely to succeed. A long -term stable financial commitment is vital to the success of this Plan. York Region recommends that the Province and Federal governments establish a Lake Simcoe Endowment Fund in the order of $500 million in order to generate revenues of approximately $36 million per year for each of 10 years. This type of financial arrangement would provide finances for Plan implementation in a sustainable manner regardless of potentially changing governments and/or mandates. Capacity to deliver on the Work Plan The anticipated outcomes of the Lake Simcoe Protection Plan represent one of the most labour intensive Provincial initiatives in recent memory. While the Plan itself represents a monumental undertaking, the work plan contemplated over the next 3 years represents is extremely aggressive. Based on a review of commitments, the Province is promising delivery of approximately 32 studies within a 3 year timeframe In contrast LSRCA is committed to undertaking only 2 studies within 1 year, and I each, within the next 3 years. Municipalities are committed to undertaking 3 studies within 5 years. t` co 0 M co (D 0) co tZ Any deviations from this timetable or inability to provide adequate resources will delay delivery of other elements of Plan. Given current fiscal limitations and projections of deficits in Provincial funding, there is a very real possibility that this timetable will be impacted. Notwithstanding statements in the Implementation section that implementation will be based on funding priority actions critical to achieving the targets and objectives set out in the Plan, many of the studies are imperative in the short term Moreover, based on experiences with other Provincial Plans, including the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan, the Greenbelt Plan, and the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, we are concerned that the Province needs additional resources to fully deliver on details to ensure successful implementation. The Region suggests that the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority ( LSRCA), if Provided with stable long -term funding, is in an ideal position to deliver many of these studies. The Authority has been internationally recognized for its work in watershed planning, its staff has the benefit of years of research and project management in this field and they have the jurisdictional contacts to make these programs successful. We suggest that the Province look to the LSRCA and its capabilities, prioritize the necessary tasks and leverage expertise and funding to ensure the studies are completed on-time and on budget. Clarification of applicable policy There are a number of Provincial Plans competing for dominance in the Lake Simcoe watershed. As a result, there are a number of instances throughout this plan where it is not entirely clear which policies apply and what the Province was actually intending by the policy. As examples, Policy 4.4DP in Chapter 4 (Water Quality), permits the Director to approve a non - municipal sewage treatment plant in the watershed unless section 6 of O.Reg. 60/08 has been revoked and the applicant demonstrates that there will be a net reduction in phosphorus loadings to the watershed. It is not clear whether this policy is applied throughout the watershed, even in the Greenbelt Plan and the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan area or what new non - municipal sewage treatments plants can contemplated or whether this could limit a municipal decision not to permit non - municipal plants. Similarly it is not entirely clear in Chapter 6 (Shorelines and Natural Heritage) whether all or some policies exclude Greenbelt and ORMCP lands. A critical evaluation and clarification of all policies and potentially a chart of applicability will help in Plan interpretation. 9 r` CO 0 CO m 0) c6 0- Municipal Requirements relating to Storm Water Management and Septic Re- inspections will add largely unfunded costs Storm Water Management As identified in comments from the Town of Georgina, Policy 4.5 requires municipalities, in collaboration with the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority ( LSRCA), to prepare and implement comprehensive stormwater management master plans (SWMP) for each settlement area in the Lake Simcoe watershed. The policy sets out a number of criteria directing how the SWMP's are to be prepared and what they must include. Most notably, the last two criteria require "an identification of the recommended approaches for stormwater management in each settlement area and an implementation plan for the recommended approaches" r The main issues relate to the costs and implementation challenges associated with S WMP's, the maintenance and retrofitting of existing stormwater facilities to meet new standards and the costs associated with the provisions of storm water management in existing developed areas with uncontrolled run -off. The Town of Aurora has undertaken a Storm Water Management Master Plan at a cost of approximately $86,000. In the Aurora case, the study identified a need for 2 additional wet ponds over 10 years with a capital cost of $7.9 million exclusive of land costs or availability. The costs of implementation of the recommendations however are in the order of $25.3 million over the next 20 years. In Georgina's case, the estimate for undertaking a Master Plan for Keswick (one of three settlement areas that will be subject to the master plan policy and be required to undertake Master Plans within 5 years) is approximately $160,000. Implementation costs are unknown. In 2007, LSRCA undertook to quantify the costs and opportunities for Stormwater retrofits in the watershed The report, entitled "Lake Simcoe Basin Stormwater Management and Retrofit Opportunities 2007'identifies 150 opportunities in communities in York Region at a total estimated retrofit costof $53.3 million, saving 3,161 kglyr of Phosphorus. On a total watershed basis there were 279 opportunities identified, totalling $116.7 million in costs and saving 7,260 kg/yr. Even with growth associated with Growth Plan forecasts, municipal costs for this work in existing development areas are largely unfunded. A funding source will be required to assist smaller municipalities in achieving conformity with the Lake Simcoe Protection Plan as currently drafted. Septic Re- inspections Policy 4.14 requires the Ministry of the Environment and the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing (MMAH) and the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) to develop a proposal for a regulation under the Ontario Building Code Act, 1992 to designate the 10 r` 00 4— 0 L0 00 (1) c6 lands within 100 metres of the Lake Simcoe Shoreline and any permanent stream of Lake Simcoe as a prescribed area for required on -site sewage maintenance re- inspections. The Town of Georgina has three main issues relating to this proposal. Town staff recommend that the focus of the program should be on older systems (10 to 15 years), as these are more likely to have problems and that municipal staff should be consulted in writing the regulation. Further, it is not clear from the wording whether the proposal deals with re- inspections of private residential Class 4 septic systems. If so wording changes are required in Policy 4.14 to acknowledge this approach. Lastly Georgina staff has issues with the various costs associated with a re- inspection program. In the Town's view, the cost of re- inspections and any remedial actions or works should be borne by the individual landowners, potentially with provincial incentive funding. Further details of the Town's issues and comments can be found within the Town's report PB -2009- 0022, dated March 2, 2009, and endorsed by the Town's Committee of the Whole on that date. Recommendations dealing with Chapter 8 Implementation and General Plan 5. The Province focus on tangible outcomes and determine the manner in which the anticipated 10 -year Plan costs can be made financially sustainable, such as a Lake Simeoe Endowment Fund in the order of $500 million in order to generate revenues of approximately $36 million per year for each of 10 years. 6. The Province leverage the experience of the LSRCA and develop additional partnerships with the LSRCA from a financial and research perspective to deliver many of these studies on time and on budget. 7. Province should clarify policy applicability given competing Provincial Plan coverage in the watershed. 8. Costs associated with undertaking and implementing Municipal Storm Water Master Plans and costs and resources required to re- inspect septic systems within 100 metres of permanent streams and the Lake Simcoe Shoreline are an issue. Provincial funding may be required to assist municipalities satisfy these aspects of Lake Simcoe Protection Plan implementation. ti CO 0 CO (D 0) M tZ We trust these cemme:.nts are of assistance to the Province. Region of York staff look forward to working with the Province and its partners in implementing the Lake Simcoe Protection Plan and would be pleased to discuss any issues that arise from these comments. Please contact Michele Maitre, Manager of Regulatory Compliance at 905- 830-4444, ext. 5097, michele.maitre@,vork.ca or Barbara Jeffrey, MCIP, RPP, Manager of Land Use Policy and Environment 905 - 830 -4444, ext.1526, barbara.ieffrey a york.ca should you require clarification. Sincerely, 65�� Erin Mahoney, M. Eng, Commissioner of Environmental Service BJ /CD/bj Bryan W. Tuckey, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Commissioner of Planning and Development Services 12 r` 00 0 r` 00 (D 0) M 0-