Loading...
10 16 2008 C of A AgendaTOWNSHIP OF ORO- MEDONTE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING AGENDA COUNCIL CHAMBERS DATE: THURSDAY, OCTOBER 16, 2008 TIME: 9:30 A.M. 1. OPENING OF MEETING BY THE CHAIR ADOPTION OF AGENDA 3. DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST AND THE GENERAL NATURE THEREOF — IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ACT 4. MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING a) Minutes of Committee of Adjustment Meeting of September 18, 2008 b) Record of Committee of Adjustment Meeting of September 30, 2008 5. PUBLIC MEETINGS a) Application: 2008 -A -43 Applicant: Wayne and Sandra Rowe Location: 66 Huron Woods Drive, Concession 6, Lot 138, Plan M -9 (Formerly Township of Oro) Proposal: Construct a detached garage in front of the dwelling b) Application: 2008 -A -44 Applicant: Robert and Renee Brennan Location: 763 Line 9 South, Part of Block X, Plan 902 (Formerly Township of Oro) Proposal: Recognize existing dwelling and free standing deck and setback from a watercourse. Applicant proposing to enclose the deck c) Application: 2008 -A -45 Applicant: Ronald Bolger Location: Lot 2, Concession 6, Part of Block F, Plan M -8 (Formerly Township of Oro) Proposal: Minimum lot frontage on a road and permit driveway d) Application: 2008 -A -46, 2008 -A -47 Applicant: Moss Developments Inc. Location: 95 Line 1 North, Part of Lot 11, Concession 2 (Formerly Township of Oro) Proposal: Construct two single detached dwellings to be used as model homes e) Application: 2008 -A -48 Applicant: Douglas Duff Location: 2721 Lakeshore Road East, Lot 20 and 21, Concession 14, Plan 51 8- 22320 (Formerly Township of Orillia) Proposal: Construct a deck within the required setback to a watercourse ...- --I-------- .[ ..J:... -.-a --- I- TL.......J.... iC onno f) Application: 2008 -B -41 Applicant: Indian Park Association Location: Oneida Avenue, Part of Block E, Plan M -8 (Formerly Township of Oro) Proposal: Boundary adjustment g) Application: 2008 -B -42 Applicant: Horseshoe Valley Lands Ltd. Location: Part of Lot 2, Concession 4, Part 1, Plan 51 R -35261 (Formerly Township of Medonte) Proposal: Easement to permit for water flow h) Application: 2008 -B -43 Applicant: Horseshoe Valley Lands Ltd. Location: Part of Lot 2, Concession 4, Part 1, Plan 51 R -35261 (Formerly Township of Medonte) Proposal: Easement to permit cross country trails i) Application: 2008 -B -44 Applicant: Horseshoe Valley Lands Ltd. Location: Part of Lots 3 and 4, Concession 4, Part 1, Plan 51 R -30671 (Formerly Township of Oro) Proposal: Easement to permit access the golf course j) Application: 2008 -B -45 Applicant: Skyline Horseshoe Valley Inc. Location: Part of Lots 3 and 4, Concession 4, Part 1, Plan 51 R -30671 (Formerly Township of Oro) Proposal: Easement to permit access from future pumping station 6. STAFF REPORTS 7. NEW BUSINESS a) Site Visits 8. ADJOURNMENT Ci TOWNSHIP OF ORO- MEDONTE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING MINUTES COUNCIL CHAMBERS DATE: THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 18, 2008 TIME: 9:30 Present: Michelle Lynch, Chair Garry Potter SEP 2 4 2088 Lynda Aiken Rick Webster MEETING COUNCILP Bruce Chappell j C. OF W. Staff present: Steve Farquharson, Secretary Treasurer /Intermediate Planner Andria Leigh, Director of Development Services Ryan Vandenburg, Planner Marie Brissette, Deputy Secretary Treasurer /Committee Coordinator OPENING OF MEETING BY THE CHAIR Michelle Lynch assumed the Chair and called the meeting to order. 2. ADOPTION OF AGENDA CA080918 -01 Moved by Webster, Seconded by Aiken It is recommended by the Committee of Adjustment that the agenda for the meeting of Thursday, September 18, 2008 be received and adopted as amended to defer 5 d) Variance Application 2008 -A -41, until September 30`h, 2008 at 9:30 a.m. Carried. 3. "DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST AND THE GENERAL NATURE THEREOF — IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ACT" None. 4. MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING a) Minutes of Committee of Adjustment Meeting of Thursday, August 21 st, 2008. CA080918 -02 Moved by Webster, Seconded by Chappell It is recommended that the minutes of the Committee of Adjustment meeting of Thursday, August 21 st, 2008 be adopted as presented. Carried. Committee of Adjustment Minutes — September 18, 2008 Page 1 5. PUBLIC MEETINGS a) Application: 2008 -A -36 Applicant: Mike Vella Location: 1844 Warminster Side Road, Plan 309, Part of Lot 45 and 46 (Formerly Township of Medonte) Proposal: Proposing to construct a new roof on an existing dwelling which would further encroach into the required exterior side yard setback. Mr. Mike Vella was present CA080918 -03 Moved by Chappell, Seconded by Potter It is recommended that the Committee approve Variance Application 2008 -A -36, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the appropriate building permit be obtained from the Township only after the Committee's decision becomes final and binding, as provided for within the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P. 13. 2. That the proposed roof be in conformity with the dimensions as set out in the application and on the sketches submitted with the application and approved by the Committee. Carried. Committee of Adjustment Minutes — September 18, 2008 Page 2 b) Application: 2008 -A -37, 2008 -A -38, 2008 -A -39 Applicant: Russell Hill Homes Location: Diamond Valley Drive, Part of Lot 3, Concession 7 (Formerly Township of Oro) Proposal: Construct three single detached dwellings located east of Line 6 North and South of Monica Court which will be used as model homes for the proposed Diamond Valley subdivision. Mr. Ugo Giammarco was present on behalf of the applicant. CA080918 -04 Moved by Aiken, Seconded by Chappell It is recommended that the Committee approve Variance Applications 2008 -A -37, 2008 -38 and 2008 -A -39, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the appropriate building permit be obtained from the Township only after the Committee's decision becomes final and binding, as provided for within the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P. 13. 2. That a Site Plan Agreement be entered into to protect the closed canopy forest cover or within the Pine Reforestation Area. 3. That the septic bed for Lot 12 not be constructed with the steep slope limits. 4. That the setbacks be in conformity with the dimensions as set out in the application and on the sketch submitted with the application and approved by the Committee. Carried. Committee of Adjustment Minutes — September 18, 2008 Page 3 c) Application: Applicant: Location: Proposal: 2008 -A -40 Vincent and Maura Caruana 1065 Lakeshore Rd. E., Plan 882, Lot 15& 16 (Formerly Township of Oro) Construct a one - storey boathouse with a gazebo attached to its roof, as well as a accessory building. Mr. Vincent Caruana and Mr. Emilio Ferrante, architect, were present. Mr. Rolf Lefuel expressed environmental and safety concerns. Mrs. Anne Hall Springle noted very little vegetation was left between the properties and that the proposal would require for trees to be removed. Mr. Reimar Ratnik commented the proposal would be of benefit to the area. CA080918 -05 Moved by Potter, Seconded by Chappell It is recommended that the Committee of Adjustment defers application 2008 -A -40 and that the applicant meet all Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority requirements, provide a tree vegetation and replacement plan, that a new site plan be submitted depicting the well prior to circulation. Carried. Committee of Adjustment Minutes — September 18, 2008 Page 4 d) Application: 2008 -A -41 Applicant: George and Heidi Caufin Location: 175 Lakeshore Road West, Lot 65, Concession 7 (Formerly Township of Oro) Proposal: Construct a single- storey boathouse. The application was deferred until September 30th, 2008 at 9:30 a.m. No members of the public were present to speak to the application. Committee of Adjustment Minutes — September 18, 2008 Page 5 e) Application: 2008 -A -42 Applicant: Marion Garnett Location: 3 Beach Road, Plan 949, Lot 16 (Formerly Township of Orillia) Proposal: Construct a single detached dwelling with an attached garage. Mr. Brock Garnett was present on behalf of the applicant. CA080918 -06 Moved by Chappell, Seconded by Aiken It is recommended that the Committee of Adjustment approves Variance Application 2008 -A- 42, being to grant a reduction for the minimum required first storey floor area from 90 square metres to 72 square metres, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the appropriate building permit be obtained from the Township only after the Committee's decision becomes final and binding, as provided for within the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P. 13. 2. That the existing dwelling on the property be removed prior to the issuance of a Building permit. Carried. Committee of Adjustment Minutes — September 18, 2008 Page 6 f) Application: 2008 -B -19 Applicant: Gavin Wright and Caron Wilson Location: 14 Cahiague Road, Lot 14, Concession 11 (Formerly Township of Medonte) Proposal: Creation of a residential lot. Mr. Gavin Wright was present. CA080918 -07 Moved by Aiken, Seconded by Webster It is recommended that the Committee of Adjustment grant provisional consent to Application 2008 -B -19 subject to the following conditions: 1. That three copies of a Reference Plan of the subject lands prepared by an Ontario Land Surveyor be submitted to the Committee Secretary- Treasurer; 2. That the applicant's solicitor prepare and submit a copy of the proposed conveyance for the parcel severed, for review by the Municipality; 3. That the applicant pay $ 2,000.00 for the lot created as cash -in -lieu of a parkland contribution; 4. That all municipal taxes be paid to the Township of Oro- Medonte; 5. That the conditions of consent imposed by the Committee be fulfilled within one year from the date of the giving of the notice. Carried. Committee of Adjustment Minutes — September 18, 2008 Page 7 I t g) Application: 2008 -B -38 Applicant: George Anderson Location: 1004 Line 14 North, Pt. Lot 90est Pt Lot 10, Concession 14 (Formerly Township of Oro) Proposal: Boundary adjustment. Mr. George Anderson were present. CA080918 -08 Moved by Chappell, Seconded by Potter It is recommended that the Committee of Adjustment grant Provisional Consent to Application 2008 -B -38 subject to the following conditions: 1. That three copies of a Reference Plan for the subject land indicating the severed parcel be prepared by an Ontario Land Surveyor be submitted to the Secretary- Treasurer; 2. That the applicant's solicitor prepare and submit a copy of the proposed conveyance for the parcel severed, for review by the Municipality; 3. That the severed lands be merged in title with 1265 Line 13 North and that the provisions of Subsection 3 or 5 of Section 50 of the Planning Act apply to any subsequent conveyance or transaction involving the subject lands; 4. That the applicants solicitor provide an undertaking that the severed lands and the lands to be enhanced will merge in title; 5. That the conditions of consent imposed by the Committee be fulfilled within one year from the date of the giving of the notice. Carried. Committee of Adjustment Minutes — September 18, 2008 Page 8 h) Application: 2008 -B -39 Applicant: Indian Park Association Location: 15 Algonquin Trail, Plan M -8, Lot 2, Concession 6 (Formerly Township of Oro) Proposal: Permit a lot addition. Mr. Ron (Rocky) Bolger was present on behalf of the applicant. CA080918 -09 Moved by Potter, Seconded by Webster It is recommended that the Committee of Adjustment grant Provisional Consent to Application 2008 -B -39 to convey a strip of land having a frontage of approximately 9 metres on Huronwoods Drive, a depth of approximately 3.5 metres, and an area of 0.15 hectares to the adjacent lands being 79 Huronwoods Drive subject to the following conditions: That the owner of 79 Huronwoods Drive apply for a minor variance for the subject lands, to recognize the existing frontage of the current driveway at 9 metres requiring relief from the minimum frontage requirements of lands zoned Private Recreational, and to permit the driveway use on the Private Recreational Lands; 2. That three copies of a Reference Plan for the subject land indicating the severed parcel be prepared by an Ontario Land Surveyor be submitted to the Secretary- Treasurer; 3. That the severed lands be merged in title with 79 Huronwoods Drive and that the provisions of Subsection 3 or 5 of Section 50 of The Planning Act apply to any subsequent conveyance or transaction involving the subject lands; 4. That the applicant's solicitor prepare and submit a copy of the proposed conveyance for the parcel severed, for review by the Municipality; 5. That the applicants solicitor provide an undertaking that the severed lands and the lands to be enhanced will merge in title; 6. That the conditions of consent imposed by the Committee be fulfilled within one year from the date of the giving of the notice. Carried. Committee of Adjustment Minutes — September 18, 2008 Page 9 i ILI i) Application: 2008 -B -40 Applicant: Stuart and Shirley Woodrow Location: Part of Lot 20, Concession 7 (Formerly Township of Oro) Proposal: Boundary adjustment. Mr. Stuart and Mrs. Shirley Woodrow were present. CA080918 -10 Moved by Potter, Seconded by Chappell It is recommended that the Committee of Adjustment grant Provisional Consent to Application 2008 -B -40 to convey a strip of land having a frontage of 6.10 metres on Line 7 North, a depth of approximately 123 metres and an area of 0.08 hectares to the adjacent lands to the north subject to the following conditions: 1. That three copies of a Reference Plan for the subject land indicating the severed parcel be prepared by an Ontario Land Surveyor be submitted to the Secretary- Treasurer; 2. That the applicant's solicitor prepare and submit a copy of the proposed conveyance for the parcel severed, for review by the Municipality; 3. That the applicant's solicitor provides an undertaking that the severed lands and the lands to be enhanced will merge in title; 4. That the conditions of consent imposed by the Committee be fulfilled within one year from the date of the giving of the notice. Carried. Committee of Adjustment Minutes — September 18. 2008 Page 10 a) I 6. STAFF REPORTS None. 7. NEW BUSINESS a) Application — 2008 -A -32 (Bell) CA080918 -11 Moved by Potter, Seconded by Chappell It is recommended that the Committee of Adjustment approves in part Variance 2008 -A -32, being to grant a front yard setback of 5.7 metres rather then the required 7.5 metres, and to increase the maximum height from 4.5 metres to 5.4 metres subject to the following conditions: 1. That an Ontario Land Surveyor provide verification to the Township of compliance with the Committee's decision by 1) pinning the footing and 2) verifying in writing prior to pouring of the foundation by way of survey /real property report so that: a) the detached garage be located no closer than 5.7 metres from the front lot line; b) that the area of the detached garage be no larger than 67.6 m2, and have a maximum height of 5.4 metres. 2. That the appropriate building permit be obtained from the Township's Chief Building Official only after the Committee's decision becomes final and binding, as provided for within the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P. 13. It is further recommended that the Committee deny in part Variance 2008 -A -32, being to grant an interior side yard setback of 1.0 metres rather than the required 2.0 metres for the proposed detached garage with a ground floor area of 67.6 m2 (728 ft). b) OMB Appeal— 2007 -A -18 (Spasov) Verbal information received. c) 2009 Calendar Schedule received. Carried. Committee of Adjustment Minutes — September 18, 2008 Page 11 2/c-) (2 8. ADJOURNMENT CA080918 -12 Moved by Chappell, Seconded by Webster It is recommended that we do now adjourn at 12:27 p.m. until 9:30 a.m., Tuesday, September 30`h, 2008 or at the call of the Chair. Carried. Michelle Lynch, Chair Steven Farquharson, Secretary Treasurer Committee of Adjustment Minutes — September 18, 2008 Page 12 TOWNSHIP OF ORO- MEDONTE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING MINUTES Tuesday, September 30, 2008 @ 9:30 a.m. Council Chambers Present: Bruce Chappell Lynda Aiken Regrets: Michelle Lynch, Chair Garry Potter Flick Webster Staff Present: Steven Farquharson, Secretary Marie Brissette, Deputy Secretary Treasurer/ Intermediate Treasurer / Committee Planner Coordinator Per Section 4.2 of the Township of Oro- Medonte's Procedural By -law No. 2007 -136, at 10:03 a.m. the meeting stood adjourned until the next regular meeting, as there were insufficient members to constitute quorum. The next meeting of the Committee of Adjustment shall be held on Thursday, October 16, 2008 at 9:30 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Township of Oro - Medonte Administration Office. Township of Oro - Medonte - Committee of Adjustment t October 16, 2008 2008 -A -43 — Wayne and Sandra Rowe 66 Huron Woods Drive, Lot 138, Concession 6 Plan M -9 (Oro) 1.PROPOSAL The applicant is proposing to construct a detached garage with an area of 67.6 m2 (728 ft2) which is proposed to be partially located in the front yard of the lot. The applicant is requesting the following relief from Zoning By -law 97 -95: to allow a detached garage to be located in the front yard 2. MUNICIPAL POLICY ZONING AND PREVIOUS APPROVALS Official Plan Designation — Horseshoe Valley- Low Density Residential Zoning By -law 97 -95 — Residential One Exception 113 (81'113) Zone Previous Applications — None 3. AGENCY COMMENTS Public Works — No Concerns Building Department — Proposal appears to meet minimum standards Engineering Department- No Concerns 4. BACKGROUND The subject property has a road frontage of approximately 39 metres (127 feet) on Huron Woods Drive, an average lot depth of approximately 65 metres (218 feet) and a lot area of approximately 0.28 hectares (0.7 acres). The property currently has a single detached dwelling on the lands. The applicant is proposing to construct a 728 square foot accessory building (detached garage), with the buildings footprint being 6 feet in front of the dwelling. Does the variance conform to the general intent of the Official Plan? The property is designated Horseshoe Valley- Low Density Residential in the Official Plan. Single detached dwellings and their accessory structures are permitted in this designation. The applicant's proposal does not appear to offend these policies, given that the variance is for the construction of a detached garage, being a permitted accessory use to a single detached dwelling. This structure would not appear to have a negative impact on the character of the residential area. On this basis the proposal is considered to conform to the intent of the Official Plan. Does the variance maintain the general intent of the Zoning By -law? The subject property is zoned Residential One Exception 113 (R1 *113) Zone. Based on a site inspection, the proposed garage would appear to be in a suitable and acceptable location. The location of the proposed garage would appear to meet the required front, rear and interior side yard setbacks, along with the prescribed building height and floor area provisions. In addition, the setback from the garage to other structures on the property, including the dwelling, will be maintained. Further, the garage is not proposed to be situated in an area that will not hinder access to the rear or side yards of the property, including access to components of the septic system. The proposed variance is considered to comply with the general intent of the Zoning By -law. f_'J_z Is the variance desirable for the appropriate development of the lot? Based on the site inspection, the subject property was noted to contain significant tree cover, which will provide a degree of visual buffering between the neighbouring dwellings, and the proposed garage. The locations on the property for the proposed detached garage are limited due to the applicants' wanting to maintain as much tree vegetation as possible. The proposed area in which the garage will be located is free on any significant tree coverage which will allow for the maximum tree preservation. Therefore, it can be determined that the proposed location of the garage in the front yard is the best location on the property. On this basis the proposal is considered appropriate for the desirable development of the lot. Is the variance minor? On the basis that the proposed garage is a permitted use, and will otherwise maintain the intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By -law and is in keeping with the general character of the surrounding residential neighbourhood, the requested variances are deemed to be minor. 5. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Committee approve Variance Application 2008 -A -43, to construction of a detached accessory structure, to be located 10 metres from the front property line, subject to the following conditions: That the detached accessory building, notwithstanding Section 5.1.3 a), otherwise meet with all other provisions for detached accessory buildings; 2. That an Ontario Land Surveyor provide verification to the Township of compliance with the Committee's decision by verifying in writing that the detached garage be located no closer than 10 metres from the front property line, in accordance with the sketch submitted with the application; 3. That the appropriate building permit be obtained from the Township only after the Committee's decision becomes final and binding, as provided for within the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P. 13 Respectfully Steven Farquharson Intermediate Planner Reviewed by Glenn White, MCIP, RPP Senior Planner N yp 0 o0S f Y NEW pRNEYUY 66 HURONWOODS DRIVE • ExlsnNC P OEL 138 -1. SECTION M -9. t DRNEIN B NG LOT 138. PLAN M -9 To TOWNSHIP OF ORO— MEDONTE ' COUNTY OF SIMCOE LAND REGISTRY OFFICE FOR , . ._____ THE LAND TILES DMSION OF METER I GAS METER SIMCOE (No.51) ffff z a EXISTING 27'- 0'x50• -0' 04 SEPTIC FIELD 24• -0 w SURVEY INFORMATION TAKE m E70511NG� N FROM: 'n ' 1000 GALLON , PLAN OF SUBDIVISION h in, OF PART OF EAST HALF ' —__N�� of LOT 2 rE h C 3 CONCESSION 6 • j "- TOWNSHIP OF ORO— MEDONTE COUNTY OF SIMCOE W.N. WILDMAN— Q.L.S. 1974 0.71 ACRES w000s M T DRIVEWAY 3N 66 HURONW ODS DRIVE ANC P DEL 13138. PELANOM -9 -9. TO TO P F ORO- MEDONTE n' O SIMCOE LAND \REGIST OFFICE FOR THE LAND TIL S DIVISION OF HYDRO, GRAS METER SIMCOE\ (No.51 METER DO Z EPTIG FIELD 27 D' -O' '3 Of t + r 24'-D ° SURVEY INFORMATION TAKE ' i'� • EXISTlNG� N FROM: ' ' T, 4 PLAN of SUBDIVISION ir OF PART OF EAST HALF 'o _� OF LOT 2. G -- - - -� CONCESSION 6 c —� - - -3 TOWNSHIP OF ORO— MEDONTE COUNTY OF SIMCOE W.N. WILDMAN— O.L.S. 1974 0.71 ACRES E=A 1 11-1492 6-A-P 2 vb - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I TQe n£wnS!Na > o FRONT ELEVATION IJU 2 LLOT 11 t TI OF PLATE TGP OF GOIINDATION F,.,BFm ------------------------------------------ TOP OF A TING RIGHT ELEVATION FALL _CoNbTFmC_T[oN To_c_o_NF_oR_m] TO O.B.C. 2006 5TANDARD5 0 rz V $ _ 1ry a r hot { .�rzovra� SIDING -- � Q � o � Sq M a jj gggq $$ � � o / 4 - _ _ T - 2F FOII�diION c j7- - _aA LIE- ir i _ _ _ .. _ . FOOLING � r REAR ELEVATION ILL c L � 6TE'=L Ml lG TpP OF P6aT€ LU � _- HOftIZONT4L BIDING ,�( V Y � i I � W ffo L _ _ _ _ _ _ _. - LOP OF FQpTIN(L ((Qmy lL 2 W LEFT ELEVATION ALL CONSTRUCTION TO CONFORM Q TO O.B.G. 2006 STANDARDS 0 u To-,)%7risbip of Oro- Medonte Enoineerinl; Department Inspection Reporucomments for Consent Minor Variance Other File No. -� 3 Name of owner LA/ l i S ^ i t3 fa Address ( 1(t'tr ti \i Subject Property Remarks: AJG G -C, 5 —;� Gcx /) ii` Committee of Adjustment Meeting Date: Keith Mathieson, Director of Engineering & Environmental Services Township of Oro - Medonte Public Works Department Inspection Report for Consent Minor Variance Other Committee of Adjustment Meeting Date f 1 File No. Name of Owner N t /' i/) �t AddressutZL" J fS r r Subject Date of Inspection Cc Name of Roads 0 R Surface of Road AuY-a- y> v 17 1, Site Lines, Township Road Poor_ Good 2. Site Lines, Subject Property Poor_ Good f Drive 3. Drainage Poor_ Good 4. Future Road Widening Required Yes_ If yes, Amount 5. Will Road Surface be adversely affected Yes_ 6. Future Drive to be located Excellent_ Excellent_ Excellent_ No .— No r Remarks: f2�2 0 QC "kern +s aA czF OrpL A Jerry Ball, Public Works Superintendent ♦, Severance / Minor Variance Review Hearing Date: C'7r-7T Application #: Owner: 1s010'r t �W 1 Y ( E MAS #: Lot #: 2' Plan #: �Al Conc. #: >'1 The Township Building Dept. has reviewed this application. ❑ Site inspection required and completed. ,4' Proposal appears to meet minimum standards. ❑ Applicant to verify that sewage system meets minimum required setbacks as per Part 8 of the Ontario Building Code. ❑ Comments: Note: This is not approval for any particular development proposal Respectfully submitted, )r Township of Oro - Medonte - Committee of Adjustment October 16, 2008 2008 -A -44 - Robert and Renee Brennan 763 Line 9 South, Part 1, Block X, Concession 9 (Former Oro) 1.THE PROPOSAL The applicant has submitted a variance application as a result of the dwelling being situated within the regulated Environmental Protection (EP) Zone as well as within the required distance to a watercourse. The applicant is also requesting a variance for detached deck next to their dwelling which is within the required setbacks to a watercourse and the Environmental Protection (EP) Zone. Further, the applicant is proposing to build an enclosed sunroom on a deck. The sunroom is proposed to encroach into the required setback to a watercourse as well as the setback to the Environmental Protection (EP) Zone. The applicant is seeking the following relief from Zoning By -law 97 -95: 1. Section 6.28— Setbacks from Limits of Environmental Protection Zone 2. Section 5.33 — Setbacks from Water Courses Required Proposed Dwelling: 30 metres 0 metres Deck: 30 metres 0 metres Proposed Sunroom: 30 metres 6 metres 2. Section 5.33 — Setbacks from Water Courses 2 MUNICIPAL POLICY ZONING AND PREVIOUS APPROVALS Official Plan Designation — Shoreline Zoning By -law 97 -95 — Shoreline Residential (SR) Zone, Environmental Protection (EP) Zone Previous Applications — A- 27/99: Application for Setback from Environmental Protection Zone for Single Family Dwelling 3.DEPARTMENT /AGENCY COMMENTS Public Works Department — No Concerns Building Department — Proposal appears to meet minimum standards Engineering Department — No Comment 4.BACKGROUND The subject property which is located on the east side of Line 9, to the south of Lakeshore Road East, currently contains a single family dwelling and a detached deck. The subject property contains approximately 78 metres of frontage on Line 9, and an area of approximately 0.42 hectares (1.04 acres). The single family dwelling and detached deck does not meet with the Required Proposed Dwelling: 30 metres 20.5 metres Deck: 30 metres 17 metres Proposed Sunroom: 30 metres 17 metres 2 MUNICIPAL POLICY ZONING AND PREVIOUS APPROVALS Official Plan Designation — Shoreline Zoning By -law 97 -95 — Shoreline Residential (SR) Zone, Environmental Protection (EP) Zone Previous Applications — A- 27/99: Application for Setback from Environmental Protection Zone for Single Family Dwelling 3.DEPARTMENT /AGENCY COMMENTS Public Works Department — No Concerns Building Department — Proposal appears to meet minimum standards Engineering Department — No Comment 4.BACKGROUND The subject property which is located on the east side of Line 9, to the south of Lakeshore Road East, currently contains a single family dwelling and a detached deck. The subject property contains approximately 78 metres of frontage on Line 9, and an area of approximately 0.42 hectares (1.04 acres). The single family dwelling and detached deck does not meet with the required setbacks to the Environmental Protection Zone and setbacks to a watercourse. The dwelling and deck are both within the Environmental Protection Zone. The dwelling is setback 20.5 metres from the watercourse, and the deck is setback 17 metres from the watercourse. The minimum required setback to both the Environmental Protection Zone and a watercourse is 30 metres. Further, the applicant is proposing to build a 4.6 metre by 7 metre enclosed sunroom on the southern portion of the deck which would not meet the required setbacks to the Environmental Protection Zone as well as the watercourse. The proposed sunroom would be setback 6 metres from the Environmental Protection Zone, and 17 metres from the watercourse. At the time of construction of the house, the applicant applied for a minor variance for the dwelling for a reduction of the 30 metre setback to the Environmental Protection Zone to 18.6 metres and was approved. Does the variance conform to the general intent of the Official Plan? The property is designated Shoreline by the Official Plan. The objectives of the designated Shoreline area are to maintain the existing character of the predominately residential area, and to protect the natural features of the shoreline area and the immediate shoreline. Section C5.2 of the Plan states that "permitted uses on lands designated Shoreline... are single detached dwellings [and accessory structures to such]..." Therefore a single detached dwelling with a detached deck would represent a permitted use. Also, this would permit the construction of an enclosed sunroom on the deck. On this basis, the proposal is considered to conform to the intent of the Official Plan. Does the variance comply with the general intent of the Zoning By -law? The subject property is zoned Shoreline Residential (SR) Zone and Environmental Protection (EP) Zone. Permitted uses in the SR Zone include single detached dwellings and accessory structures, including a detached deck. The dwelling and deck does not detract from the overall character of the lot and surrounding natural features being the watercourse which runs around the north and east side of the property and the mature trees located around the property. One of the purposes of regulating structures being built within the Environmental Protection Zone and the 30 metres setback from a water course is to maintain and enhance the ecological integrity of the natural heritage system, to ensure that development does not occur on lands that are unstable or susceptible to flooding and to ensure that development does not occur on hazardous slopes. The application has been circulated to the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority and stated they have no objections to the minor variance application. As such, the proposed dwelling meets the general intent of the Zoning By -law. Is the variance desirable for the appropriate development of the lot? Based on the site inspection, it was noted that adjacent properties that are along the watercourse have dwellings and decks that are within the 30 metre setback of the watercourse as well as the Environmental Protection Zone. The single family dwelling, detached deck and proposed sunroom would not appear to adversely affect the watercourse in any way. It is important to note that the applicants dwelling had a minor variance that was approved for the setback to the Environmental Protection Zone from 30 metres to 18.6 metres. Is the variance minor? IN i On the basis that the proposal conforms to the Official Plan, maintains the general intent of the Zoning By -law, and is considered desirable for the appropriate development of the lot, the variance is considered to be minor. &CONCLUSION This application, being to reduce the setback limits to the Environmental Protection Zone and a watercourse for the single family dwelling, deck, and proposed sunroom, generally satisfies the tests of a variance. It is recommended that the Committee approve Variance 2008 -A -44 based on the following conditions: 1. That the appropriate building permits for the detached deck and proposed sunroom be obtained from the Township only after the Committee's decision becomes final and binding, as provided for within the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P. 13. 2. That the setbacks of the dwelling, deck, and proposed sunroom be in conformity with the sketches submitted with the application and approved by the Committee; 3. That the applicants obtain the necessary permits from the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority if required All of which is respectfully submitted, Ryan Vandenburg, B.URPL Planner Reviewed by, Glenn White, MCIP, RPP Senior Planner SU BJ EG T LAN D S 763 LINE 9 SOUTH t`- m W Z J A 1 i'3 iD' I i 1 Township of Oro - Medonte Public Works Department Inspection Report for Consent Minor Variance Other Committee of Adjustment Meeting Date O&T 14 � File No:7�,—A i Name of Owner3r`Rr Subject Property Date of Inspection Name of Road Surface of Road 1. Site Lines, Township Road Poor_ Good_ Excellent_ 2. Site Lines, Subject Property Poor_ Good. Drive 3. Drainage Poor_ Good, 4. Future Road Widening Required Yes_ If yes, 5. Will Road Surface be adversely affected Yes_ 6. Future Drive to be located i. _ C p Excellent Excellent No_ Amount No Jerry Ball, Public Works Superintendent ToNA7)Jship of Oro- Medonte rn ,oineering Department inspection Report/comments for Consent Minor variance Other File No. Name of OwnerlQ,5� +tea P-)6 �n�i✓NAs✓ Address :761 Subject Property eb� q z T C X Keith Mathieson, Director of Engineering & Environmental Services . Committee of Adjustment Meeting Date: 4f�r-7 </O Hearing Date: Severance 1 Minor Variance Review DeT 1�/ Application t vS 2`j —/6 Owner: _ 11a73R� 't' MAS #:� Cyr S/ Lot #:4r/ 8LG Plan #: Conc. #: The Township Building Dept. has reviewed this application. ❑ Site inspection required and completed. Proposal appears to meet minimum standards. ❑ Applicant to verify that sewage system meets minimum required setbacks as per Part 8 of the Ontario Building Code. ❑ Comments: Note: This is not approval for any particular development proposal Respectfully submitted, 4- --- Kim Allen Chief Building Official 'n Ic"?, vo t THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO- MEDONTE P.O. BOX 100, ORO, ONTARIO, LOL 2X0 (705)487 -2171 COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT NOTICE OF DECISION Application No. A -27/99 IN THE MATTER OF Section 45 of The Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990 , c.P. 13 as amended; and IN THE MATTER OF the Official Plan of the Township of Oro - Medonte; and IN THE MATTER OF Comprehensive Zoning By -law 97 -95, as it applies to the particular application; and IN THE MATTER OF Application A -27/99 submitted Robert and Renee Brennan, owner of Part Block X, Concession 9, Plan 902 (former Township of Oro); and WHEREAS Relief is requested from Section 5.29 for the minimum setback requirement of 30 metres (98.4 feet) from an Environmental Protection (EP) Zone to 18.6 metres (61 feet) to permit the construction of a new residential dwelling. WHEREAS the subject property is designated "Shoreline" in the Official Plan, and Zoned "Shoreline Residential (SR) and Environmental Protection (EP)" under By -law 97 -95; and WHEREAS having had regard to those matters addressed by The Planning Act, in accordance with the rules and procedures prescribed under Ontario Regulation 200/96, as amended, and having considered all relevant information as presented at the public hearing on the 15'b day of July 1999. PAGE # 2 APPLICATION A -27/99 COAMTTEE OF ADJUSTDIENT DECISION BE IT RESOLVED that: Moved by, Ken Robbins seconded by Allan Johnson "That the Committee hereby GRANT Minor Variance Application A -27/99 as revised to a 21 metre (70 feet) setback and subject to the following conditions: 1. That a sketch of survey /real property report prepared by an Ontario Land Surveyor be submitted to the Township once the construction reached grade level; 2. That the setbacks be in conformity with the dimensions as set out in the application, as submitted; 3. That the Simcoe County District Health Unit approve of the application, in writing; 4. That the appropriate building permit be obtained from the Township's Chief Building Official only after the Committee's decision becomes final and binding, as provided for within the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P. 13; 5. That all municipal taxes be paid to the Township of Oro - Medonte. .....Carried." Note: The County of Simcoe has a by -law that includes setbacks for structures and buildings from County Roads. Additional information regarding this Application is available for public inspection at the Township of Oro - Medonte Administration Centre, 148 County Road 27 South in Oro Station, Ontario, Monday to Friday, between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. PAGE # 3 APPLICATION A -27/99 COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT DECISION TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to Section 53(19) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.P. 13, as amended, the above decision and/or conditions may be appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board. Only individuals, corporations and public bodies may appeal decisions in respect of applications for consent to the Ontario Municipal Board. A notice of appeal may not be filed by an unincorporated association or group. However, a notice of appeal may be filed in the name of an individual who is a member of the association or group. THE LAST DATE FOR FILING A NOTICE OF APPEAL IS WEDNESDAY, THE 4th DAY OF AUGUST 1999. A "NOTICE OF APPEAL" setting out in writing the supporting reasons for the appeal should be received on or before the last date for "Appeal' accompanied by a cheque in the amount of ONE HUNDRED AND TWENTY FIVE DOLLARS payable to the MINISTRY OF FINANCE. The notice is to be submitted to the Secretary - Treasurer of the Committee of Adjustment, PO Box 100, Oro, Ontario, LOL 2X0. Members concurring in this decision: Ken Robbins DATED this 15' day of Julyl999. Alan Martin Andria Leigh, Hons. B.A., MCIP,RPP Secretary - Treasurer Committee of Adjustment OCT -02 -2008 17:14 TOWNSHIP OF ORO- MEDONTE 10/02/2008 THU 16:13 FAX Sent by Facsimile 1 -705- 487 -0133 P.001 /002 ®001/002 October 2, 2008 File No.: 2008 -A -44 IMS No.: PV00516C2 Mr. Steven Farquharson Secretary- Treasurer p Committee of Adjustment Corporation of the Township of Oro - Medonte 148 Line 7 South, P.O. Box 100 Oro, ON LOL 2X0 Tel: 905 - 895 -1281 1 -800- 465 -0437 Fax: 905. 853.5881 Dear Mr. Farquharson: L" -Mail: inf"fai mon.ca Web: wwwAsrca.on.ca Re: Minor Variance Application - Reduce Watercourse & 1;P Zane Setbacks 120 nayview Parktvay Robert & Renee Brennan, Owners Nox Ontari o 2n em Part of Lot 25, Concession 10 (Former Township of Oro) L3Y 4X7 763 Line 9 South, Part 1, Plan 51R -28369 & Part Block X, Plan 902 Township of Oro - Medonte (Oro), County of Simeoe The Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority (LSRCA) has reviewed the above noted Minor Variance application in the context of the Provincial Policy Statement 2005 (PPS - 2005) under the Planning Act, in accordance with the Federal Fisheries Act as per our Level 3 agreement with the Federal Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO), and in accordance with Ontario Regulation 179 /06 made under the Conservation Authorities Act. This application, if approved, would permit the construction of sunroom (i.e., enclosure of an existing deck) which is located 6 metres from the Environmental Protection (EP) Zone and 17 metres from the watercourse. Our mapping indicates that the above noted property is entirely within the Approved Regulation Limit of the LSRCA. A tributary of Burls Creek traverses the northern and eastern portion of this property, with associated meanderbelt (erosion allowance) and Regional Storm floodplain (FE = 228.88 - 223.15 mast). A permit may be required for any future development of the regulated portion of the above noted property. Based on our review, and a site visit on September 18, 2008, we provide the following comments: A 1. Based on our mapping, the existing single family dwelling, proposed sunroom and existing deck are located within the regulated portion of this property. A permit under Ontario Regulation 179/06 is required from the LSRCA for the proposed development. Watershed 2 The existing deck and existing residence were constructed prior to May 6, 2006, the date Ontario Regulation 179/06 came into effect. for L ife 3 While the proposed sunroom is within the meanderbelt of the creek, it is no closer to the creek than the existing deck. 4. As per our Level 3 agreement with DFO, the file has been reviewed by our Senior Fisheries Biologist, Mr. Jeff Andersen, under the Federal Fisheries Act. The site plan, as submitted, illustrates that the new structures are situated away from the creek. As there are no works within the creek, and there is no further encroachment of permanent structures towards the creek, under the Fisheries Act, there are no concerns. Page I of 2 OCT -02 -2006 17:14 TOWNSHIP OF ORO- MEDONTE 10/02/2008 THU 16:14 PAX October 2, 2008 Pile No.: 2008 -A -44 IMS No.: PV00516C2 Mr. Steven Farquharson Township of Oro - Medonte Page 2 of 2 P.002i002 0002/002 5. Please be advised that in accordance with the LSRCA's Planning and Development Fees Policy (June 27, 2008), the total fee for this application is $200.00. The applicant should be advised that currently this fee is outstanding and to please forward the above mentioned fee as soon as possible. By copy of this letter to the applicant, we request that they submit the above mentioned fee at this time. Based on the above noted information, the LSRCA has no objection to the Minor Variance application, subject to the following conditions: 1. That a permit under Ontario Regulation 179/06 be obtained from the LSRCA, prior to the issuance of a municipal building permit for the proposed sunroom. 2. That prior to any site alteration, proper erosion and sediment control measures must be in place. 3. The LSRCA requests that payment of the outstanding LSRCA review fee of $200.00 be made a condition of approval of the above noted Minor Variance application. I trust this meets your requirements at this time. In order to facilitate our processing of this file, please reference the above noted file numbers in future correspondence. If you have questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at 905-895-1281, extension 287. Please advise us of your decision in this matter. Yours truly, `"t,L� Ian Walker Environmental Planner IW /ph C. Robert & Renee Brennan, Owners, 763 Line 9 South, R.R.d#2, Hawkestone, ON, LOL 1 TO - Mail t \Ilawke5�giclshareAVan WiCo�mspondence' V' lam�ingNnrixueestOro-Mrdnnte {2W8\2008 -A -0A (Minor Variance - $renimn) 763 Lim 9 Sodi - I.wpl TOTAL P.002 Township of Oro - Medonte - Committee of Adjustment October 16, 2008 2008 -A -45 — Ronald Bolger Plan M -8, Lot 2, Concession 6 (Formerly Oro) 1.PROPOSAL The applicant is seeking relief from the required minimum lot frontage on a road as well as permitting a driveway in a Private Recreational Exception 114 (PR *114) Zone to access the applicants' dwelling to the west. Specifically, the applicant is requesting the following relief from Section 4.0, Table S5 of Zoning By -law 97 -95: Proposed Required Minimum Lot Frontage: 9 metres 30 metres 2.MUNICIPAL POLICY, ZONING AND PREVIOUS APPROVALS Official Plan Designation — Residential, Oro Moraine Core /Corridor Area, Rural Zoning By -law 97 -95 — Private Recreational Exception 114 (PR *114) Zone, Agricultural/Rural (A/RU) Zone Previous Applications — 2008 -B -39, Application for Consent 3.DEPARTMENT /AGENCY COMMENTS County of Simcoe - Public Works Department— No Concerns on Behalf of Roads Department Building Department— Proposal appears to meet minimum standards Engineering Department— No Concerns 4.13ACKGROUND The applicant is requesting relief from the minimum lot frontage requirement of 30 metres in the Private Recreational Exception 114 (PR *114) Zone to 9 metres, as well as permitting a driveway to a dwelling to the west. The lands to which the variance applies to has a frontage of 9 metres and a depth of 3.5 metres. The land is currently utilized as the driveway access to 79 Huron Woods Drive. The applicant has purchased this parcel of land from Indian Park Association and previously applied and was approved for a boundary adjustment. Before the applicant purchased this parcel of land, there was a registered easement between Indian Park Association and the owners of 79 Huronwoods Drive (Bolger) for use of the land as a driveway access to the applicants' property. Does the variance conform to the general intent of the Official Plan? The subject land where the driveway is located is designated Residential by the Official Plan (OP). Section C14.2.4 of the OP states 'Permitted uses on lands designated Residential on the schedules to this Plan are single detached dwellings, home occupations, private recreational facilities... etc" The lands subject to the variance application are currently being used as a driveway to access the applicants dwelling, all of which is permitted in the Residential designation. On this basis, the proposal is considered to conform to the intent of the Official Plan Does the variance comply with the general intent of the Zoning By -law? The subject land where the driveway is located is zoned Private Recreational Exception 114 (PR`114) Zone by Zoning By -law 97 -95 as amended. The Private Recreational Zone generally applies to lands that are the site of a private recreational facility. The Indian Park Association, who were the previous owners of this parcel of land, sold the applicant the 9 metre by 3.5 metre parcel as the IPA are dissolving and selling off their lands. The applicant needed to purchase this land in order to be able to access his lands. The applicant's dwelling is within the Agricultural /Rural Zone which permits a single detached dwelling. Is the variance minor? On the basis that the proposal conforms to the Official Plan and maintains the general intent of the Zoning By -law, the variance is considered to be minor. 5.CONCLUSION The proposed variance application for relief from the minimum required lot frontage, and permitting a driveway to access a dwelling located to the west would appear to conform to the policies of the Official Plan, and would maintain the intent of the provision of the Zoning By -law as noted above. 6.1RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Committee approve Variance 2008 -A -45, being to grant a reduction for the minimum required lot frontage in a Private Recreational Zone from 30 metres to 9 metres and to allow a driveway to be access a dwelling located to the west. Respectfully submitted, Ryan Vandenburg, B.URPC Planner Reviewed by Glenn White, MCIP RPP Senior Planner 75(i)q Severance 1 Minor N�Ariance Review Hearing Date: DC-'1 ( k>.l J-� Application #: Owner: MAS #: 2 -A -y5- Lot #: % Plan #: H Conc. #: Aa The Township Building Dept. has reviewed this application. ❑ Site inspection required and completed. c®-Proposal appears to meet minimum standards. ❑ Applicant to verify that sewage system meets minimum required setbacks as per Part 8 of the Ontario Building Code. ❑ Comments: Note: This is not approval for any particular development proposal Respectfully submitted, Kim Allen Chief Building Official Township of Oro - Medonte Public Works Department Inspection Report for Consent Minor Variance ✓� Other Committee of Adjustment Meeting Date ?- f� �T � File No. — ys Name of Owner r)76 (—�;Er2 Subject Propert y Date of inspection Name of Surface of Road 1. Site Lines, Township Road 2. Site Lines, Subject Property Drive 3. Drainage 4. Future Road Widening Required Poor_ Good_ Excellent_ Poor_ Good_ Excellent_ Poor_ Good_ Excellent_ Yes_ No_ If yes, Amount 5. Will Road Surface be adversely affected Yes_ No 6. Future Drive to be located Remarks: No C(2oce+1V5 Q!),l auAA69 an Ir�-65 ()L—a . all Jerry Ball, Public Works Superintendent To »Jnship of Oro-T9edonie ErfoineerinQ Department Inspection Report/Comments for Consent Minor Variance c./ Other File No. Name of Owner �/i�41 13'oLpIrETZ - -.9 Hafain%tuvoy�t Q2 Subject Property Remarks: �Q G DhJ(�e2 Keith Mathieson, Director of Engineering & Environmental Services Committee of Adjustment Meeting Date: Township of Oro - Medonte - Committee of Adjustment October 16, 2008 2008 -A -46 and 2008 -A -47 — Moss Developments 95 Line 1 North, Part of Lot 3, Concession 7 (Former Oro) 1. PURPOSE OF APPLICATION The applicant is proposing to construct two single detached dwellings located east of Line 1 North, which will be used as model homes for the proposed Country Lane Estates subdivision. The applicant is requesting the following relief from Zoning By -law 97 -95: Permitted Proposed Section 5.36 (b) Model Homes 1 2 2. MUNICIPAL POLICY ZONING AND PREVIOUS APPROVALS Official Plan Designation — Rural Residential Zoning By -law 97 -95 -Rural Residential One (RUR1) Zone and Environmental Protection (EP) Zone Previous Applications — none 3. DEPARTMENT /AGENCY COMMENTS Public Works Department — No comments received Building Department — Proposal appears to meet minimum standards Engineering Department — No Concerns 4. BACKGROUND The applicant proposes to build 2 detached residential dwellings to be used as model homes within the draft approved subdivision known as Country Lane Estates. These model homes are being proposed to be built on Lots 9 and 12 of the Plan of subdivision. It is the intention of the applicant to use these dwellings as model homes for the proposed subdivision and to then sell them to potential buyers. Does the variance conform to the general intent of the Official Plan? The subject lands are designated Rural Residential in the Township Official Plan. Single detached dwellings, home occupation are permitted in this designation. The applicant's proposal does not appear to offend these policies, given that the variance is for the construction of two single detached dwellings. The proposed model homes will be located on the lots within a draft approved plan of subdivision. On this basis the proposal is considered to conform to the intent of the Official Plan. Does the variance conform to the general intent of the Zoning By -law? The subject property is zoned Rural Residential One (RUR1) Zone and Environmental Protection (EP) Zone. Based on a site inspection, the proposed dwellings would appear to be in a suitable and acceptable location. The other element to this variance is that the developer seeks to build two homes in addition to the one that is currently being constructed. Instead of one dwelling that is permitted by Zoning By -law 97 -95. Section 5.36 b) (Temporary Construction and Sales Uses) states: ? b) Nothing in this By -law shall prevent the use of land for a sales office and /or a model home for the sale of dwelling units provided the dwelling units to be sold are to be located on lands within the limits of the Township of Oro- Medonte. Given that the dwellings are part of a subdivision with 20 residential lots, it is submitted that two model homes for such a subdivision is reasonable and in keeping with the intent of the Zoning By- law. Is the variance appropriate for the desirable development of the lot? Given that these homes are typically developed with a high degree of detail and landscaping, because it is the intention of the developer to sell these dwellings as part of the subdivision. Furthermore, in accordance with normal Township policy, the developer will be required to prepare an engineered lot grading plan prior to the issuance of a building permit. On this basis it is suggested that the proposed variance will provide for the appropriate and desirable development of the subject lots. Is the variance minor? The construction of model homes for sales purposes is common in new plans of subdivision. On this basis and on the basis that the proposal is to develop only 2 lots for model home purposes, it is suggested that the proposed variance is minor. 5. RECOMMENDATION If Committee is satisfied that the application is appropriate, it is recommended that Committee approve variance application 2008 -A -46 and 2008 -A -47, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the appropriate building permit be obtained from the Township only after the Committee's decision becomes final and binding, as provided for within the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P. 13. 2. That the setbacks be in conformity with the dimensions as set out in the application and on the sketch submitted with the application and approved by the Committee; All of which is Nspectfully submitted, Stav`en Farquharson, B.URPL Intermediate Planner Reviewed by, Glenn White, MCIP, RPP Senior Planner -56 -1f) f I H cv z Il IN LLJ z :D LANDS ° `ti x tr F®R-W MOSS 5 k T I'M Z": lea .M. 2 L" na ,A,, O ME g11GMAL ROM .10. a 9 TvKCM LOTS 11 ANp 'A' CMCE5 2 Imo. ARE GEODETIC. SITE BENCHMARK IS TOP OF SIB ST CORNER OF PROPERTY, SHOWN AS 241.78M. Lom ARE GEODETIC AND ARE REFERRED TO MONUMENT BASED UPON THE APPRI OVERALL LOT GRADING I TOWNSHIP STANDARDS A SEASONAL WATERTABLE ILLUSTRATED ON THE AF LOT GRADING PLAN. 2 SHOULD SITE GONDITII TIME OF CONSTRUCTIC FROM THOSE ILLUSTR, THIS PLAN OR THE 0 GRADING PLAN, THE E SHALL BE CONSULTEC PROCEEDING WITH COI 3. ALL DISTURBED AREAS RECEIVE MINIMUM 100M TOPSOIL AND SOD. 4_ THE BUILDER IS RESPOF TO ADJUST THE UNDER! FOOTING ELEVATION IN TO ENSURE FROST CO' OF 1.22m MIN. MEASUI FROM FINISHED GRADE LEGEND 221.19 EXISTING ELEVAT 291.14 PROPOSED ELEV� 2.0% FLOW DIRECTION A SURFACE DRAIN, 40 PROPOSED STOR 4® PROPOSED CATCH CBO PROPOSED CATC ® BELL PEDESTAL 19 CABLE PEDESTM OW WELL © TRANSFORMER © STREETLIGHT POM OLS LIGHT STANDARC SMB9 SUPER MAILBOX 41 DOOR LOCATION N0. RENSONS DESIGN GRADE 'X(�j d Al A � fi,Pt vExffAb211 '�� f,K of wn T • r� � 5iwsh9 vocYwn t 7 1- .,,. M�. <.'43 —r i'�`''S� e,. N L I_ Yl F~ , FRQNT ELLY DQN U g to �11 i t Mill "I lIx" IT OMULBWON -- YxEOCwof G ' iMN. °PPPOVµ SiMIP PIIM SIN m +nom :>a ° w �au.. .. ...•° a ..�...._. _, . uG9a ST1fE1/ n caxc[<i�ox rl��a.emmmo•.. u SSICN 2EPP w 'a {• ... ..... �... .... � ... ..... it ... YL n %4Mf N LOTS $1 AIN A"CIXN.'ES$(M ] y'JP• i -==. =+ • � °— � � . � x _ n J SK0.YM" ��R �y,r � eW � 1 z• sw _ 3 xxa � 9 T E a • 1B 4B IJ 1° 13 t. iJ y S 1 -- `o BCGC aB S Bl � 1 2 r.• J e 1 ry 1 it R f 1 �6 or 4t�0a �' ^� Nms SIPLCJ � ..., o,�.. man ae 4 -- „ •., � I t INa }4 ° i f I ` u, rt LANp 5URUEYORS1xc ., .e........... °. Y._.. �., IBBK. ARE GEODERC. SITE BENCHMARK IS TOP OF SIB :ST CORNER OF PROPERTY. SHOWN AS 241.75M. um ARE GEODETIC AND ARE REFERRED TO MONUMENT BASED UPON THE APPIN 291.19 OVERALL LOT GRADING I 291.14 TOWNSHIP STANDARDS A 2.OX SEASONAL WATERTABLE i\/, ILLUSTRATED ON THE AF 40 LOT GRADING PLAN. 40 2. SHOULD SITE CONDITII CEO TIME OF CONSTRUCTIC ® FROM THOSE ILLUSTR, B THIS PLAN OR THE O O GRADING PLAN, THE I Qp SHALL BE CONSULTEE © PROCEEDING WITH COI 3. ALL DISTURBED AREAS RECEIVE MINIMUM 100M TOPSOIL AND SOD. 4. THE BUR.DER IS RESPO! TO ADJUST THE UNDER! FOOTING ELEVATION IN TO ENSURE FROST CO OF 1.22m MIN. MEASU', FROM FINISHED GRADE LEGEND 291.19 EXISTING FLEW 291.14 PROPOSED ELEV/ 2.OX FLOW DIRECTION A i\/, SURFACE DRAIN, 40 PROPOSED STOR 40 PROPOSED CATCH CEO PROPOSED CATC ® SELL PEDESTAL B CABLE PEDESTA O WELL Qp TRANSFORMER © STREER"T POW LIGHT STANDARE SMB® SUPER MALBOX A DOOR LOCATION E�-�`-- 40. PENSIONS I DESIGN GRADE ..jH [ I t CIIIK��� -i( I xeucwce � : I FRONT ELEVATION aexE.e � i LLB. HIM W ` T; l ''k C r V REAR.ELEYEILQN ''k C r V 7:S-0);o Severance / Minor Variance Review Hearing Date: -T 1616 ❑ Site inspection required and completed. Proposal appears to meet minimum standards. ❑ Applicant to verify that sewage system meets minimum required setbacks as per Part 8 of the Ontario Building Code. ❑ Comments: Note: This is not approval for any particular development proposal Respectfully submitted, Kim Allen Chief Building Official Township of Oro- Medonle Enoineerin2 Department Inspection Report/Comments for Consent Minor Variance Other File No.�f, —" Name of Owners "Lo dt > Address t +r Subject Property Remarks: l i C °lam c c-p� — ':-40 — . �XC, , I Keith Mathieson, Director of Engineering & Environmental Services . Committee of Adjustment Meeting Date: 1 Toy+ reship of Oro Medonte Dig ineerinP Department Inspection ReportiComments for Consent Minor Variance Other File No. d - Name of Owner � ELLP L Address .r Subject Property Remarks: Keith Mathieson, Director of Engineering & Environmental Services . 1.� Committee of Adjustment Meeting Date: / Township of Oro - Medonte Public Works Department Inspection Report for Consent Minor Variance Other Committee of Adjustment Meeting Date G l t' File No. � —J1 —A_ Name of Owner Address ! Subject Date of Inspection Name of Road Surface of 1. Site Lines, Township Road 2. Site Lines, Subject Property Drive 3. Drainage 4, Future Road Widening Required Poor Good_ Excellent_ Poor_ Good_ Excellent_ Poor Good_ Excellent_ Yes_ No If yes, Amount 5. Will Road Surface be adversely affected Yes_ No 6. Future Drive to be located Remarks: l (C Jerry Ball, Public Works Superintendent ct"j ■ 4A Township of Oro- Medonte - Committee of Adjustment October 16, 2008 2008 -A -48 — Douglas Duff 2721 Lakeshore Road East 51 R- 22320, Lots 20 and 21, Conc. 14 (Former Oro) 1.THE PROPOSAL The applicant is proposing to construct a 36.2 m2 (390.5 ftZ) wrap- around deck which is attached to the east and south side of a single detached dwelling. The applicant is requesting relief from Section 5.33 "Setback from Water Courses:" Required Proposed Setback to a Water Course: 30 metres 13 metres 2 MUNICIPAL POLICY ZONING AND PREVIOUS APPROVALS Official Plan Designation —Shoreline Zoning By -law 97 -95 — Shoreline Residential (SR) Zone Previous Applications — 3.DEPARTMENVAGENCY COMMENTS Public Works Department- No Concerns Building Department— Proposal Appears to Meet Minimum Standards Engineering Department — No Comment 4.13ACKGROUND The subject property has a road frontage of approximately 15 metres (50 feet) on Lakeshore Road East, a lot depth of approximately 106 metres (347 feet) and a lot area of approximately 0.14 hectares (0.35 acres). The applicant is proposing to construct a 36.2 mZ (390.5 ftZ) wrap- around deck which is attached to the east and the south side of the single detached dwelling. Does the variance conform to the general intent of the Official Plan? The property is designated Shoreline by the Official Plan. The objectives of the Shoreline Designation are to maintain the existing character of this predominantly residential area and to protect the natural features of the shoreline area and the immediate shoreline. The proposed deck would therefore meet the objectives of this designation. Further, Section C5.2 of the Plan states "Permitted uses on lands designated Shoreline are single detached dwellings (and accessory uses), "which includes decks. The proposed 36.2 square metre deck attached to an existing dwelling would therefore constitute an expansion to a permitted use within the Shoreline Designation. On the basis of the above, the proposed deck is deemed to maintain the general intent of the Official Plan. Does the variance comply with the general intent of the Zoning By-law? The subject property is zoned Shoreline Residential (SR) Zone. Permitted uses in the SR Zone include single detached dwellings and accessory structures, including an attached deck. In assessing the issue of conformity with the Zoning By -law, the proposed dwelling should not detract from the overall character of the lot and surrounding natural features being the watercourse which runs through the property and the mature trees located in the front and side yard. One of the purposes of regulating structures from being built within the 30 metres setback from a watercourse is to maintain and enhance the ecological integrity of the natural heritage system, to ensure that development does not occur on lands that are unstable or susceptible to flooding and to ensure that development does not occur on hazardous slopes. The application has been circulated to the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority and they stated they have no objections to the minor variance application. On the basis of the above, the proposal to reduce the required setback from a watercourse is deemed to maintain the general intent of the Zoning By -law. Is the variance desirable for the appropriate development of the lot? Based on the site inspection, the proposed addition of a new deck would not appear to adversely affect the watercourse, and the proposed variance is considered to be desirable for the development of the lot. Is the variance minor? On the basis that the proposal conforms to the Official Plan, maintains the general intent of the Zoning By -law, and is considered desirable for the appropriate development of the lot, the variance is considered to be minor. 5.CONCLUSION This application, being to reduce the setback from a watercourse for a proposed attached deck to a single family dwelling generally satisfies the tests of a variance. &RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Committee approve Variance Application 2008 -A -48 subject to the following conditions: 1. That the size and setbacks of the proposed dwelling be in conformity with the sketches submitted with the application and approved by the Committee; 2. That an Ontario Land Surveyor provide verification to the Township of compliance with the Committee's decision by 1) pinning the footing so that: i. The dwelling including the attached deck be located no closer than 13 metres from the water course; 3. That the applicants obtain approval from the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority if required 4. That the appropriate building permit be obtained from the Township only after the Committee's decision becomes final and binding, as provided for within the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P. 13.; All of which is respectfully submitted, Reviewed by Ryan Van denburg, B.URPL 7 Glenn White, MCIP RPP Planner Senior Planner I =0 2 0 'tom Kg co NeJSG iii Ul Kg co NeJSG 1 Sria u��{n..a..�l• tans L YETPt $PIAN: F LLQNG S2VIIM Allll Yn YOES: CI A`:v •r , u:l,li, µdK F,n51 'AbA iQ QNTANIp k �R. LRWUQ IU IYUW x.11a. .p IQ pE FXAM(ll Alinl: 'i K Q VWMF.A. 8E AMEV. J. WALLS MIA IuU, 4 w M IRQUA .A .t •,A N W C WIAf\i ul� ,,1 X?O V •v OTM M: Tr11 LMEYI IIMII. NIMit lAtlt OQWIA$Ata1W.tWC(KMi 11wtln16N IH.w R.W 0 e9 IN LINE NOTES METµ SPOKE RAKJNC t}' MCN .CTO SOUTH AND Ndl1N -[asl SIDES; OLASS ENCASED I. YELL ALONG EAST DOE. PLEASE RECEN TO ONTAMD BNtdNG CODE STANOARO SSI CS 3. CRUMO TO UNDERSOE OE DECK TO BE ERAMEO AL.. SOVM AND NOKTNEAST SMES; EAST SATE I, BE UNERAYFD. i WALL$ MLL HA. VERTCAL MOOD ypHL 10 NR ' LA 'E RAL RRACWL UNLESS MENTµWED OINERWSE. `1- EAST PROFILE OCT -03 -2008 16:11 TOWNSHIP OF ORO- MEDONTE 10/03/2008 FRI 15:10 FAX P.001 /002 0001/002 e Sent by Facsimile 1- 705 -487 -0133 ~ October 2, 2008 File No.: 2008 -A -48 IMS No.: PV00521 C2 Mr. Steven Farquharson 'ref: 905-8954281 Secretary- Treasurer 1 -800- 465 -0437 Fax! 905-853 -5881 Committee of Adjustment E-mail! in(orn;tsmtmn.c Corporation of the Township of Oro - Medonte w6z `' "" ".rsr`a'°"`" 148 Line 7 South, P.O. Box 100 120 Bayviev Parkway Oro, ON LOL 2XO Box 282 Newmarket, Ontario 13Y 4x1 Dear Mr. Farquharson: Re: Minor Variance Application - Reduce Watercourse Setback Douglas Duff, Owner Part of Lot 20 & 21, Concession 14 (Former Township of Oro) 2721 Lakeshore Road Fast, Parts 1 -6, Plan 51R -22320 Township of Oro- Medonte (Oro), County of Simcoe The Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority (LSRCA) has reviewed the above noted Minor Variance application in the context of the Provincial Policy Statement 2005 (PPS - 2005) under the Planning Act, in accordance with the Federal Fisheries Act as per our Level 3 agreement with the Federal Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO), and in accordance with Ontario Regulation 179/06 made under the Conservation Authorities Act. This application, if approved, would permit the construction of a new deck which is located a minimum of 13 metres from the watercourse. Our mapping indicates that the above noted property is partially within the Approved Regulation Limit of the LSRCA. The regulated portion of the parcel contains a tributary of a known coldwater creek (known internally as Maplewood Creek), with associated meanderbelt (erosion allowance), and Regional Storm floodplain (FE = 225.13 - 219.65 mall), The southern portion of the above noted site is regulated for shoreline erosion allowance and 100 -year wave uprush (FE = 219.92 masl). A permit will be required for any future development of the regulated portion of the above noted property. K'atershed Based on our review, we provide the following comments: for Life I . Based on our mapping, the proposed deck is located within the regulated portion of this property. A permit under Ontario Regulation 179/06 is required from the LSRCA for the proposed development. Please note, permit application RPMA4594 has been submitted for the proposed development. 2. The proposed new deck is no closer to the creek than the existing single family dwelling. While the proposed deck is within the meanderbelt of the creek, it is no closer to the creek than the existing single family dwelling. Page 1 of 2 OCT -03 -2008 16:11 TOWNSHIP OF ORO- MEDONTE P.002i002 10/03/2008 FRI 15:11 FAX 0002/002 October 2, 2008 File No.: 2008 -A -48 IMS No.: PV0052IC2 Mr, Steven Farquharson Township of Oro- Medonte Page 2 of 2 4. As per our Level 3 agreement with DhO, the file has been reviewed by our Senior Fisheries Biologist, Mr. Jeff Andersen, under the Federal Fisheries Act. The site plan, as submitted, illustrates that the new structure is situated away from the creek. As there are no works within the creek, and there is no further encroachment of permanent structures towards the creek, under the Fisheries Act, there are no concerns. Based on the above noted information, the LSRCA has no objection to the Minor Variance application, subject to the following conditions: That a permit under Ontario Regulation 179/06 be obtained from the LSRCA, prior to the issuance of a municipal building permit for the proposed deck. 2. That prior to any site alteration, proper erosion and sediment control measures must be in place. By copy of this letter, the applicant is advised that in accordance with the LSRCA's Planning and Development Fees Policy (June 27, 2008), the total fee for this application is $200.00. The applicant should be advised that currently this fee is outstanding and to please forward the above mentioned fee as soon as possible. I trust this meets your requirements at this time. In order to facilitate our processing of this file, please reference the above noted file numbers in future correspondence. If you have questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at 905- 895 -1281, extension 287. Please advise us of your decision in this matter. Yours truly, p Uy Ian Walker Environmental Planner I W1ph C. Douglas Duff, Owner, 2721 Lakeshore Road East, R.R. #1, Hawkestone, ON, LOL ITO - Mail P. I9gwkostone\ shnmdllvnWlConespenAmrcaNlanningl Vniieimosl0m -AAOJovICB008�26C &49& (Minor Vaname -'Ddi 27'1 LaAeslmro Road F. m - I -,d Township of Oro - Medonte Public Works Department Inspection Report for Consent Minor Variance Other Committee of Adjustment Meeting Date �: T /(,o ot File No. 2bce -A Name of Owner { �Lfb Lfl$ GF Address Subject Property Date of'hispection Name of Road Surface of Road 1. Site Lines, Township Road Poor_ Good_ Excellent_ 2. Site Lines, Subject Property Poor_ Good_ Excellent_ Drive 3. Drainage Poor_ Good_ Excellent_ 4. Future Road Widening Required Yes_ No_ If yes, Amount 5. Will Road Surface be adversely affected Yes_ No_ 6. Future Drive to be located Remarks: tsu) c ck icAz '-` Jerry Ball, Pub is Works Superintendent Tort reship of Oro- Medonle Engineering Department Inspection Report/Comments for Consent Minor Variance Other File No. 2r is —8 Name of Owner �est �t�AS FF Address D Subject Property Remarks: CIA Q /old — try CautuENf—, • y� Keith Mathieson, Director of Engineering & Environmental Services Committee of Adjustment Meeting Dater �%/ O I Severance / Minor Variance Review Hearing Date: Application #: Owner: "L�b-CAS )ULEF MAS #: Lot #: /� Plan #: -V-2 —2Z�6) Conc. #: %O / �ff The Township Building Dept. has reviewed this application. ❑ Site inspection required and completed. ..Z Proposal appears to meet minimum standards. ❑ Applicant to verify that sewage system meets minimum required setbacks as per Part 8 of the Ontario Building Code. ❑ Comments: Note: This is not approval for any particular development proposal Respectfully submitted, Kim Allen Chief Building Official 'kxr Oro- Medonte Township To whom it may concern: Doug and Dianne Dui my neighbours, bave approached me regarding their application for a building permit for a deck on their house at 2721 Lakeshore Road East. I want you to know that I have no objection to this construction on their property- Neighbour: St I i -W 2 G1IA1) Address: Date: 1nnt ? �b — 1 Z04 -d 100/100 d 151-1 -Nodd Nd5Z;ZI 800NO -d3S Oro - Medonte Township To whom it may concern: Doug and Dianne Duff, my neighbours, have approached me regarding their application for a building permit for a deck on their house at 2721 Lakeshore Road East. I want you to know that I ha a no objection to this construction on their property. Neighbour: - - Address: d- AS L.Arz -K e Gz 9�-N> . T iti. Oro - Medonte Township To whom it may concern: Doug and Dianne Duff, my neighbours, have approached me regarding their application for a building permit for a deck on their house at 2721 Lakeshore Road East. I want you to know that I have no objection to this construction on their property. r; w - Neighbour: Address: cX 702 % Date: "11111171/ c2e_Ad—?- Oro - Medonte Township To whom it may concern: Doug and Dianne Duff, my neighbours, have approached me regarding their application for a building permit for a deck on their house at 2721 Lakeshore Road East. I want you to know that I have no objection to this construction on their property. Neighbour: S112Lt c Address: r� 7.2 3 Date: SF/tr S�D u Township of Oro - Medonte - Committee of Adjustment October 16, 2008 2008 -B -41 — Indian Park Association Block E, Plan M -8 (Formerly Oro) 1. PROPOSAL The purpose of application 2008 -B -41 is to permit a lot addition /boundary adjustment. The subject land is Part of Block E, Plan M -8, having a frontage of approximately 17.2 metres on Oneida Avenue, and a depth of approximately 83 metres. The subject lands are proposed to be added to the adjacent lands to the west (7 Oneida Avenue, Lot 69 Plan M -8). No new building lot is proposed to be created as a result of the lot addition. Official Plan Designation— Residential Zoning By -law 97 -95 — Residential One Exception 113 (R1 *113) Zone and Private Recreational Exception 114 (PR *114) Zone Previous Applications — 3. AGENCY COMMENTS County of Simcoe - No Concerns Public Works Department - No Concerns Building Department— Proposal appears to meet minimum standards Engineering Department — No Concerns - Gas utility should be circulated for comments Consumers Gas — No Comments received 4. BACKGROUND The applicant is proposing a boundary adjustment to convey approximately 0.14 hectares (0.35 acres) from the subject property to the neighbouring residential lot being 7 Oneida Avenue. Due to the proposed retained lot, being Part of Block A, Plan M -30, would consist of approximately 17.4 hectares (43.01 acres), and is currently vacant. No new building lots are proposed to be created as a result of the lot addition. 5. OFFICIAL PLAN The subject lands are designated Residential by the Official Plan (OP). Section D2 of the OP contains policies with respect to subdivision of land. Specifically, Section D2.2.2 - "Boundary Adjustments ", provides the following guidance for Consent Applications in general: a consent may be permitted for the purpose of modifying lot boundaries, provided no new building lot is created... the Committee of Adjustment shall be satisfied that the boundary adjustment will not affect the viability of the use of the properties affected." With respect to the application at hand, no new building lots are proposed and do not affect the viability of the current use. As such, the proposed boundary adjustment is generally in keeping with the intent of the residential policies stated in the Official Plan, and otherwise conforms with the boundary adjustment policies contained in Section D.2.2.2. At the time of writing this report no comments have been received from the County of Simcoe Planning Department. 6. ZONING BY -LAW The subject property is zoned Private Recreational Exception 114 (PR *114) Zone by Zoning By -law 97 -95 as amended. This zone permits a wide range of passive and active recreational uses and does not require a minimum lot area or frontage. Lands zoned PR *114 permit a recreation centre which may include swimming pools, tennis courts, change facilities, meeting rooms, lounges, or similar recreation facilities being non commercial in nature, and storage areas for skis and other recreational equipment and a maintenance shop and an storage area for equipment used to maintain the lands and facilities in the private park. None of these uses currently exists on the portion of the property that is proposed to be conveyed to 7 Oneida Avenue. The lot to be enhanced, being 7 Oneida Avenue, is zoned Residential One Exception 113 (R1 *113) Zone. The Lands zoned R1 *113 address the minimum setbacks for structures from the surrounding property lines and public streets. Pending approval of the application, the lot to be enhanced will still maintain the required lot area, use and as well as comply with the minimum setback requirements for a structure in the R1 *113 Zone. The application would comply with the provisions as prescribed by the Zoning By -law. Staff is of the opinion that that rezoning of the conveyed lands is not necessary at this time but however it should be noted that the no residential structures are permitted on the lands with the Private Recreation Exception 114 (PR *114) Zone. 7. CONCLUSION The proposed consent application for a boundary adjustment would appear to conform to the policies of the Official Plan, and maintains the use and setback provisions of the Zoning By- law. 8. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Committee grant Provisional Consent to Application 2008 -B -41 to convey a strip of land having a frontage of approximately 17.2 metres on Oneida Avenue a depth of approximately 83 metres, and an area of 0.14 hectares to the land adjacent being 7 Oneida Avenue subject to the following conditions: 1. That three copies of a Reference Plan for the subject land indicating the severed parcel be prepared by an Ontario Land Surveyor be submitted to the Secretary- Treasurer; 2. That the severed lands be merged in title with 7 Oneida Avenue and that the provisions of Subsection 3 or 5 of Section 50 of The Planning Act apply to any subsequent conveyance or transaction involving the subject lands; 3. That the applicant's solicitor prepare and submit a copy of the proposed conveyance for the parcel severed, for review by the Municipality; 4. That the applicants solicitor provide an undertaking that the severed lands and the lands to be enhanced will merge in title; 5. That the conditions of consent imposed by the Committee be fulfilled within one year from the date of the giving of the notice. Reviewed by Glenn White, MCIP RPP Senior Planner firole t 4 Y .- a O 1fl�'K 1p. 4S ' 4 Z51, btu Qv JAI ar� s J L4 ® xQk v a �e.rw � ect s s ZWW Y ✓ liMl Q N '� ��a3 Qty OD omm D", , � a ©vc—Av w' slk�Tcy s-eowwc �i e'P f 5vt3Jj� c RM17 RF7Alti6c t? 1— 41v Ds 0 0 42 M 126 168 210 252 n etM x ®Teraview" W�E v May 26, 2008 Protected by Copyright May not be reproduced without permission. This map was compiled using plans and documents 5 recorded in the Land Registry System and has been prepared for property Indexing purposes only. This is not a Plan of Survey. For actual dimensions of property boundaries, see recorded plans and documents. Teranet Customer Service Centre: 1- 800- 208 -5263 (Toronto: 416- 360 -1190) I 51R33070 I 1 �WI 4 (la 4 �I �I sKc:rcAt 3 S1i TC,ki 5-lyowlA+ic- AR t/lov�7 �t3�'rn�G � NARrs 1 — t1 1 /v 1 @�g�I Pu<�4m� -o:,a BLOCK �I-__ Ovk%9W6'r -0rtLU.n \ l REGISTERED - 34c3 J PLAN \ �� / �-5IR -2J665 ar IR1' II u � REGISTERED 70 BLOCK E PLAN OF SURVEY OF PARTS OF BLOCKS V AND 'E' REGISTERED PLAN M -8 (OEOORAPHIC TOWNSHIP OF ORO) TOWNSHIP OF ORO— MEDONTE COUNTY OF SIMCOE C1. STRONGMAN 015. 2004 w M -8 " -AAvUS 74..— PLAN 52 -'R, 91, DION Rt3 C6 W uro swuem . anw a aar SCNEOU[E OF PARIS _ Snn BLACK "A" w ...., �... W.W .o[) AVENUE ..- MACK Ci J ., ,w,� 64"- Iccvvan / _x 4 ,mom O,t�S� t` c' 1 1 vmt iaos'� -ovvv 0.T1 � BLOCK "A•• 85 yhR0� LL4F \ e \\ (--m�i eP —_ _, 09 PLAN M-8 ISO f I I P,Ir1 �y173 L- - - - -� - 1 / /v 1 @�g�I Pu<�4m� -o:,a BLOCK �I-__ Ovk%9W6'r -0rtLU.n \ l REGISTERED - 34c3 J PLAN \ �� / �-5IR -2J665 ar IR1' II u � REGISTERED 70 BLOCK E PLAN OF SURVEY OF PARTS OF BLOCKS V AND 'E' REGISTERED PLAN M -8 (OEOORAPHIC TOWNSHIP OF ORO) TOWNSHIP OF ORO— MEDONTE COUNTY OF SIMCOE C1. STRONGMAN 015. 2004 w M -8 " -AAvUS 74..— PLAN 52 -'R, 91, DION Rt3 C6 W uro swuem . anw a aar SCNEOU[E OF PARIS _ Snn BLACK "A" w ...., �... W.W .o[) AVENUE ..- MACK Ci J ., ,w,� 64"- Iccvvan / _x 4 ,mom O,t�S� t` c' 1 1 vmt iaos'� -ovvv 0.T1 � BLOCK "A•• 85 yhR0� LL4F \ e \\ (--m�i eP —_ _, 09 PLAN M-8 ISO f ToJA7nship of Oro- Medonte EDOineeriDg Department Inspection Report/Comments for Consent Minor Variance Other File No. ' 'Name of Owner 1 Address `�C-�z , 1't t Subject Property Remarks: ,. Keith Mathieson, Director of Engineering & Environmental Services Comrruttee of Adjustment Meeting Date: L9 Township of Oro - Medonte Public Works Department Inspection Report for Consent =% Minor Variance Other Committee of Adjustment Meeting Date File No. ° � t Name of Owner I FA Subject Property rsC A a r') Ry? Date of lnspection —C c3 l �01 ` Name of Road C' I12° i Y 0 Surface of Road A A41-!� 10�2 - 1. Site Lines, Township Road Poor_ Good Excellent_ 2. Site Lines, Subject Property Poor_ Good % Excellent_ Drive 3. Drainage Poor_ Good Excellent_ 4. Future Road Widening Required Yes_ No If yes, Amount 5. Will Road Surface be adversely affected Yes_ No —� 6. Future Drive to be located Remarks: 6o CQ°tcen'T -s eY� Re-aia 11r On. la;aQ'S l) -Cg2i: �l Jerry Ball, po! Works Superintendent Severance / Minor Variance Review Hearing Date: Application #: L's --r, ° V/ Owner: MAS #: Lot #: B#o(` -k A Plan #: Conc. #: `NU The Township Building Dept. has reviewed this application. ❑ Site inspection required and completed. ,4 Proposal appears to meet minimum standards. ❑ Applicant to verify that sewage system meets minimum required setbacks as per Part 8 of the Ontario Building Code. ❑ Comments: Note: This is not approval for any particular development proposal Respectfully submitted, Kim Allen Chief Building Official Farquharson, Steven From: Marek, Greg , Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2008 8:49 AM To: Farquharson, Steven Subject: RE: Consent Applications Hey Steven, County has no comment for all five applications. Regards, Greg Marek Planner II Phone: 705-726-9300 x1362 NA Please consider the environment before printing my email. From: Farquharson, Steven [mailto :sfarquharson @oro- medonte.ca] Sent: Monday, October 06, 2008 2:19 PM To: Marek, Greg Subject: Consent Applications Hev Gree. __ _ _ - can you please review these applications and provide comments. Four of the applications are easements up in Horseshoe Valley Resort (2008 -B -42 to 2008 -B -45) and the other one is a boundary adjustment in Sugarbush(2008- B -41). Regards, Steven Farquharson,B.URPL Intermediate Planner Township of Oro - Medonte Bus: (705) 487-2171 Ext: 4239 Fax: (705) 487-0133 www.oro- medonte.ca This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by VPNetworks(1), and is believed to be clean. Township of Oro - Medonte - Committee of Adjustment October 16, 2008 2008 -B -42 — Horseshoe Valley Lands Ltd. Conc. 4. Part Lots 2. Plan 51 R- 35261, Part 1 (Former Township of Medonte) 1.PROPOSAL The purpose of application 2008 -B -42 is to permit the creation of an easement to provide water flow from the pond across property. The pond is located on the golf course which is not owned by the applicant. No new lots will be created as a result of this application. 2 MUNICIPAL POLICY ZONING AND PREVIOUS APPROVALS Official Plan Designation — Horseshoe Valley Village Zoning By -law 97 -95 — Residential Two Exception 60 (R2 *60) Zone, Future Development Exception 67 (FD *67) Zone, Private Recreational (PR) Zone and Environmental Protection (EP) Zone. Previous Applications — 3. AGENCY COMMENTS Public Works Department — No Concerns Building Department — Proposal Appears to Meet Minimum Standards Engineering Department — No Concerns County of Simcoe- No Concerns NVCA- No Comments Received 4. BACKGROUND The purpose of the application is to create an easement for the purpose of allowing water flow from the pond across property which is not owned by the applicant. The proposed easement would cross the golf course which is owned by Skyline Horseshoe Valley. 5. OFFICIAL PLAN The subject lands are designated in the Horseshoe Valley Village in the Township's Official Plan. There are no specific policies in the Official Plan regarding the conveyance of easements or right -of -ways for the proposed purpose. 6. ZONING BY -LAW The subject property is zoned Residential Two Exception 60 (R2 *60), Future Development Exception 67 (FD *67) Zone, Private Recreational (PR) Zone and Environmental Protection (EP) Zone by Zoning By -law 97 -95 as amended. Within the Township there are a number of properties which contain split zonings. The portion of the property that the applicant is requesting the easement is located in the Environmental Protection (EP) Zone. Due to the applicant not proposing for there to be any construction on the lands and for it to remain in the state in which it currently exists, the application would comply with the provisions as prescribed by the Zoning By -law. 7. ANALYSIS 3 This easement is required to provide water flow from the pond across the golf course which is owned by Skyline Horseshoe Valley Lands Inc. This application does not offend the intent of the Official Plan as it applies to the Horseshoe Valley Settlement Area and the Zoning provisions in By -law 97 -95 as amended. 8. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Committee approve consent application 2008 -B -42 subject to the following conditions: That three copies of a Reference Plan indicating the lands subject to the easement be prepared by an Ontario Land Surveyor and be submitted to the Secretary- Treasurer; 2. That the applicant prepare and submit 3 original copies of the deeds for the easement, one copy to be retained by the Municipality; and, That the conditions of consent imposed by the Committee be fulfilled within one year from the date of the giving of this notice as noted below. All of whi Iris respectfully submitted, Steven Farquharson, B.URPL Intermediate Planner Reviewed by, Glenn White, MCIP, RPP Senior Planner i r C n` m ion J � N 0 0� !gJ'tn °>'�m r JC6 F 0:OWO �Qo M J S N In w k Ok J s ai a • Ma z ° Q k? : 9 J . °a z o .n° z, ON MM O� w p0 ZIM 2 \ �M N ` 1a N N •O maN ` co hag t N Zv"•t <� V mti `� M ` "- 000Z /a COO o M ` M 0 Z si pk NN © It t ° Q k? : 9 �..,, °a z o h MCOt1 N Qarg 4 z6 Li o oM 0 k N�� oa o r 3 n c� _ M UUCNiN O N _ wmmo, t 't � �... a a w Q k? : 9 M J h MCOt1 N Li 0 C " 0 VI V) co aWR ' h Wwrn n o r GO OD w oOD1 �J _ M UUCNiN O N _ wmmo, 'o --) Z7 N II NN N\` N N O 'IM1 _ LJ1 0. Q y�d'9K z < Z N ^ M 4 m O Q r N f M1 VI M < 0 N cn w 2 <N ZN 1 y ALLOWANCE BETWEEN 4 f d- N ^ 00 M�tr) f o ON O ' w p # ' ° n r�i 2 d mo n w Q `�' hN Z Z V M Q m 2 J d W �d NM ONM EO •off sl (0 Z 2 ~ �M Q c � O N ^� m co ^Na J N� 4co) z h. I Sn eOp .d.•p P. W OQpjl a ` l Z ° In M47 Z _ a P1 m �l to a z O I n ti 2 co 4Q. C Q p. 4�. P.I.N. 58527-0401 C7 k Sap.r�o k • mOO O� *N I k PtQK k~k N z kk a Ik 3 AND 4 CDNCESSDNS h e OOOU VYTT 8000 - -- NO RR (NONS29NOt TALLtY ROAD) CAVRW TOTAL AREA - 1ffi472 CUW m MAN 6 HORSESHOE VALLEY RESORT LID. HORSESHOE VALLEY LANDS LTD. ND HORmam/BALM{Iomm LMM DOR Mna LOTS I AND 2 CONCESSION 3 - wMna LOU 1 AND 2 CONCESSON 4 Ns ww ORIGINAL ROAD ALLOWANCE SETREEN CONCESSIONS 3 ! 4 ..LOMB • IN OFOMMID IIIEM! 6 YFDWR TOWDOW OF ORO—HEOONTE COUNTY OF SHCOE OLp DA ADNL. O.LS InDINO ASTIII STI�NG LTD. OW w � +n °'"^^* wnw+ nu ury www wm I� uxe wrxwn.w mw—lus —..l. uis wxw�w mrm er oKecm avu CAVRW TOTAL AREA - 1ffi472 CUW m MAN 6 HORSESHOE VALLEY RESORT LID. HORSESHOE VALLEY LANDS LTD. ND HORmam/BALM{Iomm LMM DOR Mna LOTS I AND 2 CONCESSION 3 - wMna LOU 1 AND 2 CONCESSON 4 Ns ww ORIGINAL ROAD ALLOWANCE SETREEN CONCESSIONS 3 ! 4 ..LOMB • IN OFOMMID IIIEM! 6 YFDWR TOWDOW OF ORO—HEOONTE COUNTY OF SHCOE OLp DA ADNL. O.LS InDINO ASTIII STI�NG LTD. .: a .. . >. , :may... .. >-)O Severance / Minor Variance Review Hearing Date: G'(° !- 1/6 Application #: _ 2 ` � Owner: - 44"'4' FUTFUM Lot #: 2- S Plan #: BT' Conc. #: `I The Township Building Dept. has reviewed this application. ❑ Site inspection required and completed. Proposal appears to meet minimum standards. ❑ Applicant to verify that sewage system meets minimum required setbacks as per Part 8 of the Ontario Building Code. ❑ Comments: Note: This is not approval for any particular development proposal Respectfully submitted, Kim Allen Chief Building Official Township of Oro- Medonte rnoineerinp Department Inspection Report/Comments for Consent Minor Variance Other File No. Subject propeny Remarks: N I Keith Mathieson, Director of Engineering & Environmental Services . Committee of Adjustment Meeting Date: Township of Oro - Medonte Public Works Department Inspection Report for Consent t. Minor Variance Other Committee of Adjustment Meeting Date File No. Name of Subject Date of Inspection Name of Road Surface of 1. Site Lines, Township Road Poor_ 2. Site Lines, Subject Property Poor_ Drive 3. Drainage Poor_. 4. Future Road Widening Required 5. Will Road Surface be adversely affected 6. Future Drive to be located 5112 5�d Good_ Excellent_ Good Excellent_ Good_ Excellent_ Yes_ No_ If yes, Amount Yes_ No Remarks: ale . inT G4=f��� Jerry Ball, Public orks Superintendent Farquharson, Steven From: Marek, Greg Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2008 8:49 AM To: Farquharson, Steven Subject: RE: Consent Applications Hey Steven, County has no comment for all five applications. Regards, Greg Marek Planner II Phone: 705-726-9300 x1362 APlease consider the environment before printing my email. From: Farquharson, Steven [mailto :sfarquharson @oro- medonte.ca] Sent: Monday, October 06, 2008 2:19 PM To: Marek, Greg Subject: Consent Applications Hey Greg, can you please review these applications and provide comments. Four of the applications are easements up in Horseshoe Valley Resort (2008 -B -42 to 2008 -B -45) and the other one is a boundary adjustment in Sugarbush(2008- B -41). Regards, Steven Farquharson, B.URPI Intermediate Planner Township of Oro - Medonte Bus: (705) 487-2171 Ext: 4239 Fax: (705) 487-0133 www.oro- medonte.ca This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by VPNetworks(U and is believed to be clean. Township of Oro - Medonte - Committee of Adjustment ' 1 October 16, 2008 2008 -B -43 — Horseshoe Valley Lands Ltd. Conc. 4, Part Lots 2, Plan 51 R- 35261, Part 1 (Former Township of Medonte) 1. PROPOSAL The purpose of application 2008 -B -43 is to permit the creation of an easement to permit cross country trails to pass through property owned by Horseshoe Valley Lands Ltd. No new lots will be created as a result of this application. 2. MUNICIPAL POLICY, ZONING AND PREVIOUS APPROVALS Official Plan Designation — Horseshoe Valley Village Zoning By -law 97 -95 — Residential Two Exception 60 (R2 *60) Zone, Future Development Exception 67 (FD *67) Zone, Private Recreational (PR) Zone and Environmental Protection (EP) Zone. Previous Applications — 3. AGENCY COMMENTS Public Works Department — No Concerns Building Department — Proposal Appears to Meet Minimum Standards Engineering Department — No Concerns County of Simcoe- No Concerns NVCA- No Comments received. G—W-]Si1;SelRoll 11 e The purpose of the application is to create an easement for the purpose of allowing cross country trails across property owned by Horseshoe Valley Lands Ltd. The proposed easement would allow the cross country trails to connect to lands owned by Skyline Horseshoe Valley Inc. 5. OFFICIAL PLAN The subject lands are designated in the Horseshoe Valley Village in the Township's Official Plan. There are no specific policies in the Official Plan regarding the conveyance of easements or right -of -ways for the proposed purpose. 6. ZONING BY -LAW The subject property is zoned Residential Two Exception 60 (R2 *60), Future Development Exception 67 (FD *67) Zone, Private Recreational (PR) Zone and Environmental Protection (EP) Zone by Zoning By -law 97 -95 as amended. Within the Township there are a number of properties which contain split zonings. The portion of the property that the applicant is requesting the easement is located in the Environmental Protection (EP) Zone and Residential Two Exception 60 (R2 *60) Zone. Due to the applicant not proposing for there to be any construction on the lands and for it to remain in the state in which it currently exists, the application would comply with the provisions as prescribed by the Zoning By -law. 7. ANALYSIS This easement is required to allow for cross country trails to pass through the lands owned by Horseshoe Valley Lands and then connect to other cross country trails located on the lands owned by Skyline Horseshoe Valley Lands Inc. This application does not offend the intent of the Official Plan as it applies to the Horseshoe Valley Settlement Area and the Zoning provisions in By -law 97 -95 as amended. 8. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Committee approve consent application 2008 -B -43 subject to the following conditions: 1. That three copies of a Reference Plan indicating the lands subject to the easement be prepared by an Ontario Land Surveyor and be submitted to the Secretary- Treasurer; 2. That the applicant prepare and submit 3 original copies of the deeds for the easement, one copy to be retained by the Municipality; and, 3. That the conditions of consent imposed by the Committee be fulfilled within one year from the date of the giving of this notice as noted below. All of which is respectfully submitted, ven Farquharson, B.URPL Intermediate Planner Reviewed by, Glenn White, MCIP, RPP Senior Planner t� SCHEDULE I REWIRE THIS PLAN TO PLAN 51R— 'ART PART OF LOTS CONCESSION PART OF P, I.N. AREA (m') ,:A BE DEPOSITED UNDER THE LAND TITLES ACT. RECEIVED AND DEPOSITED 1 s A 4 4 74055 -0123 4 NORDIC TRAIL PART I SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AS SET MIT IN INST. A.'. LT522875 k SCI08651. PART 3 (BY PLAN 51M -456) LEGEND PLAN 51R -28744 DATE 2008 DATE LOT 161 a DENOIES FOUND SURVEY MONUMENT PLAN 51M-456 ❑ DENOTES PLANTED SURVEY MONUMENT DINO R. S. AR {,AN D RE�T,�T jR FDR E LAND TITtC DIVIr.�( SIB DENOTES STANDARD IRON BAR (�nw)' 00 aeCB,C SSiB DENOTES SHORT STANDARD IHIXJ BAR syW(.D ++✓✓/ SOUTHERLY CORNER 161, PLAN 51M -456 U" ONTARIO LAND SURVEYOR SIMCOE 51 . Ie DENOTES IRON BAR B LOT y.1 WT DENOTES ATINESS x -- DENOTES FENCING PLAN OF SURVEY OF PART OF (1403) DENOTES W_ DOUGLAS SMITH, O.L.S. r .(.0 (1650) DENOTES DINO P& ASTRI, O.L.S. £ ,` a$0 w LOTS 3 & 4 i s /a Ow CONCESSION 4 ah° Ok hOO T ssret.,) / ` GEOGRAPHIC TOWNSHIP OF ORO PART 23 TOWNSHIP OF ORO— MEDONTE U COUNTY OF SIMCOE PART 3 SCALE = 1:500 " >ID6, P,LM 74055 -0224 W 'TS ssal.n DINO R.S. ASTRI, O.L.S. C O N C E S 1 O N 4 SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE S o / f 2 1 CERTIFY THAT: WUR THE d a PART 22 THIS SURVEY AND PLAN ARE CORRECT AND IN ACCORDANCE 1 ) SURVEYS ACT. BIB SURVEYORS ACT AND THE LAND TIRES ACT AND 1 O / V PTN, 74055-0123 t L O T A THE REGULATIONS MADE UNDER NIEM, i & SCI O8651, 2) THE SURVEY WAS COMPLETED ON THE DAY OF � Subject to aasn ants a set m! in )nsf. Nos. m LT522875 pAfF, DINp R S. ASTHI ONTARIO LAND SURVEYOR DINO ASTRI 51 R -30671 `PLAN _. BEARING NOTE `'7 SURVEYING LTD. BEARINGS ARE ASTRCNOWC AND ARE REFERRED TO THE 1.661 Welham Road, Bartle, Ontat1 %L4N 087 LIMIT BETWEEN PARTS J k 22 AS SHOWN ON PLAN Phone: 706- 792 -6780 Fa%:706. 792.4164 51R -30671 k BEING N5'25 '45'W. r• ' wwwsaMaunayin9.Dam METRIC -- sse(Ieso) DRAWN BY: RG CHECKED BY DRSA\RG PROJECT No. 710.1 PPIANd t! _ DISTANCES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE IN METRES AND �._ — -- '-� CAN BE CONVERTED TO FEET BY OIVEING BY 0.3048 _ I Severance / Minor Variance Review Hearing Date: i° Application #: G� 0, ° %f — Owner: �f'vL.C%'l fart MAS #: Lot #: Z- Plan #: S,-/IZ E r0 Conc. #: The Township Building Dept. has reviewed this application. ❑ Site inspection required and completed. Proposal appears to meet minimum standards. ❑ Applicant to verify that sewage system meets minimum required setbacks as per Part 8 of the Ontario Building Code. ❑ Comments: Note: This is not approval for any particular development proposal Respectfully submitted, Kim Allen Chief Building Official ToNj7psbip of Oro- Medonte Engineering; Department Inspection Report/Comments for Consent Minor Variance Other File No 2 - 1 Name of Owner tt t t tT "a Address Subject Property _ p Remarks: �I Keith Mathieson, Director of Engineering & Environmental Services Committee of Adjustment Meeting Date: Township of Oro - Medonte Public Works Department Inspection Report for Consent Minor Variance Other Committee of Adjustment Meeting Date to i'_'t / 6/2 File No. 2ej!!-— Name of Subject Property (Z> Date of Inspection Name of Surface of I. Site Lines, Township Road 2. Site Lines, Subject Property Drive 3. Drainage 4. Future Road Widening Required I Poor_ Good_ Excellent_ Poor_ Good_ Excellent_ Poor_ Good_ Excellent_ Yes_ No If yes, Amount 5. Will Road Surface be adversely affected Yes_ No 6. Future Drive to be located Remarks: kan c, �ce - -- -,- ;r"- y i Jerry Ball, Public Works Superintendent Farquharson, Steven From: Marek, Greg [ Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2008 8:49 AM To: Farquharson, Steven Subject: RE: Consent Applications Hey Steven, County has no comment for all five applications. Regards, Greg Marek Planner II Phone: 705-726-9300 x1362 APlease consider the environment before printing my email. From: Farquharson, Steven [ mailto :sfarquharson @oro- medonte.ca] Sent: Monday, October 06, 2008 2:19 PM To: Marek, Greg Subject: Consent Applications Hey Greg, can you please review these applications and provide comments. Four of the applications dre easements up in Horseshoe Valley Resort (2008 -B -42 to 2008 -B -45) and the other one is a boundary adjustment in Sugarbush(2008- B -41). Regards, Steven Farquharson, B.URPL Intermediate Planner Township of Oro- Medonte Bus: (705) 487 -2171 Ext: 4239 Fax: (705) 487-0133 www.oro- medonte.ca This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by VPNetworks(1), and is believed to be clean. Township of Oro- Medonte - Committee of Adjustment October 16, 2008 2008 -B -44 — Horseshoe Valley Lands Ltd. Part Lots 3 and 4, Concession 4 Plan 51 R- 30671, Part 1 (Former Township of Oro) 1.PROPOSAL The purpose of application 2008 -B -44 is to permit the creation of an easement to permit Skyline Horseshoe Valley Inc. to access the golf course through a cart path, which is located on the applicants' property. No new lots will be created as a result of this application. 2 MUNICIPAL POLICY ZONING AND PREVIOUS APPROVALS Official Plan Designation — Horseshoe Valley— Low Density Residential Zoning By -law 97 -95 — Residential One Exception 140 (R1 `140) Zone Previous Applications — 3. AGENCY COMMENTS Public Works Department — No Concerns Building Department — Proposal Appears to Meet Minimum Standards Engineering Department — No Concerns County of Simcoe- No Concerns 4. BACKGROUND The purpose of the application is to create an easement for the purpose of allowing Skyline Horseshoe Valley Inc to access the golf course through the cart path which is owned by the applicant. 5. OFFICIAL PLAN The subject lands are designated in the Horseshoe Valley — Low Density Residential in the Township's Official Plan. The permitted uses with this designation include single detached dwelling, home occupations and recreational uses such as golf courses. There are no specific policies in the Official Plan regarding the conveyance of easements or right -of -ways for the proposed purpose. 6. ZONING BY -LAW The subject property is zoned Residential One Exception 140 (131'140) Zone by Zoning By -law 97 -95 as amended. Due to the applicant not proposing for there to be any construction on the lands and for it to remain in the state in which it currently exists, the application would comply with the provisions as prescribed by the Zoning By -law. 7. ANALYSIS This easement is required to allow for Skyline Horseshoe Valley Inc to access the golf course by cart path which is on the lands owned by the applicant. This application does not offend the intent of the Official Plan as it applies to the Horseshoe Valley- Low Density Residential and the Zoning provisions in By -law 97 -95 as amended. 8. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Committee approve consent application 2008 -B -44 subject to the following conditions: 1. That three copies of a Reference Plan indicating the lands subject to the easement be prepared by an Ontario Land Surveyor and be submitted to the Secretary- Treasurer; 2. That the applicant prepare and submit 3 original copies of the deeds for the easement, one copy to be retained by the Municipality; and, 3. That the conditions of consent imposed by the Committee be fulfilled within one year from the date of the giving of this notice as noted below. f which is respectfully submitted, even Farquharson, B.URPL Intermediate Planner Reviewed by, Glenn White, MCIP, RPP Senior Planner ti l ", \� Fgg+ Y4 t. � tl���p � � m# 1�4`v-0. � �... }A � x Severance / Minor Variance Review Hearing Date: T L6% Application #: —z ! Owner: MAS #: Lot #: -5 -/ -/ Plan #: j ?F 3 �1 Cone. #: 1'x'2 The Township Building Dept. has reviewed this application. ❑ Site inspection required and completed. Proposal appears to meet minimum standards. ❑ Applicant to verify that sewage system meets minimum required setbacks as per Part 8 of the Ontario Building Code. ❑ Comments: Note: This is not approval for any particular development proposal Respectfully submitted, Kim Allen Chief Building Official Tow),SbW of Oro- Medonte Engineering Department Inspection Report/Comments for Consent Minor Variance Other File No. Name of Owners i c 3r tk cF (s ,r Subject Property Ctza / s6 `a � iiid'3 (AI i Remarks: K. Keith Mathieson, Director of Engineering & Environmental Services . Cotmniuee of Adjustment Meeting Date: •. h Township of Oro - Medonte Public Works Department Inspection Report for Consent sO` Minor Variance Other Committee of Adjustment Meeting Date r File No.� Name of Owner Subject Property "° 4'j � 5 ` Date of Inspection Name of Road Surface 1, Site Lines, Township Road 2. Site Lines, Subject Property Drive 3. Drainage 4. Future Road Widening Required Poor_ Good_ Excellent_ Poor Good_ Excellent_ Poor_ Good_ Excellent_ Yes_ No If yes, Amount 5. Will Road Surface be adversely affected Yes— No_ 6. Future Drive to be located Remarks: A4o P . 1 r r-a' c Jerry Ball, Public Works Superintendent i Farquharson, Steven From: Marek, Greg [ Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2uva a:4a Ann To: Farquharson, Steven Subject: RE: Consent Applications Hey Steven, County has no comment for all five applications. Regards, Greg Marek Planner II Phone: 705-726-9300 x1362 APlease consider the environment before printing my email. From: Farquharson, Steven [ mailto :sfarquharson @oro- medonte.ca] Sent: Monday, October 06, 2008 2:19 PM To: Marek, Greg Subject: Consent Applications Hey Greg, can you please review these applications and provide comments. Four of the applications are easements up in Horseshoe Valley Resort (2008 -B -42 to 2008 -B -45) and the other one is a boundary adjustment in Sugarbush(2008- B -41). Regards, Steven Farquharson, B.URPL Intermediate Planner Township of Oro - Medonte Bus: (705) 487 -2171 Ext: 4239 Fax: (705) 487-0133 www.oro - medonte.ca This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by VPNetworks(1), and is believed to be clean. Township of Oro - Medonte - Committee of Adjustment October 16, 2008 2008 -B -45 — Skyline Horseshoe Valley Inc. Lot 4, Concession 4 Plan 51 R- 30671, Part 1 (Former Township of Oro) 1.PROPOSAL The purpose of application 2008 -B -45 is to permit the creation of an easement to permit access from future pumping station across the existing golf course, which is owned by Skyline Horseshoe Valley Inc to future subdivision development owned by Horseshoe Valley Lands Ltd. No new lots will be created as a result of this application. 2 MUNICIPAL POLICY ZONING AND PREVIOUS APPROVALS Official Plan Designation — Horseshoe Valley— Low Density Residential Zoning By -law 97 -95 — Residential One Exception 140 (R1 *140) Zone Previous Applications — 3. AGENCY COMMENTS Public Works Department — No Concerns Building Department — Proposal Appears to Meet Minimum Standards Engineering Department — No Concerns 4. BACKGROUND The purpose of the application is to create an easement for access for a future pumping station across the existing golf course, which is owned by Skyline Horseshoe Valley Inc. The pumping station will service a future residential subdivision on lands owned by Horseshoe Valley Lands Inc. 5. OFFICIAL PLAN The subject lands are designated in the Horseshoe Valley — Low Density Residential in the Township's Official Plan. The permitted uses with this designation include single detached dwelling, home occupations and recreational uses such as golf courses. There are no specific policies in the Official Plan regarding the conveyance of easements or right -of -ways for the proposed purpose. 6. ZONING BY -LAW The subject property is zoned Residential One Exception 140 (81'140) Zone by Zoning By -law 97 -95 as amended. Due to the applicant not proposing for there to be any construction on the lands and for it to remain in the state in which it currently exists, the application would comply with the provisions as prescribed by the Zoning By -law. 7. ANALYSIS This easement is to provide access to a future pumping station over an existing golf course owned by Skyline Horseshoe Valley Inc. The future pumping station is located on the west side of Line 4, South of Alpine Way. This application does not offend the intent of the Official Plan as it applies to the Horseshoe Valley Settlement Area and the Zoning provisions in By -law 97 -95 as amended. 5�Z 8. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Committee approve consent application 2008 -13-45 subject to the following conditions: 1. That three copies of a Reference Plan indicating the lands subject to the easement be prepared by an Ontario Land Surveyor and be submitted to the Secretary- Treasurer; 2. That the applicant prepare and submit 3 original copies of the deeds for the easement, one copy to be retained by the Municipality; and, 3. That the conditions of consent imposed by the Committee be fulfilled within one year from the date of the giving of this notice as noted below. (DAll of which i pectfully submitted, en B.URPL Intermediate Planner Reviewed by, Glenn White, MCIP, RPP Senior Planner SCHEDULE I REQUIRE THIS PLAN TO PLAN 51R- \,\ 0 PART IPART OF LOT I CONCESSION I P PART of P.I.N. AREA (m') BE DEPOSITED UNDER THE LAND TITLES ACT. RECEIVED AND DEPOSITED \\ 1 z 4 -0224 t04BA \ 2 —74055 PART 1 SUBJECT TO EASWEN IS AS 9� \ SET OUT IN INST, No's. LT327069 k 0522878. 90R'0 �0 'b �y -�' yW� °P,p DATE 2008 DATE l A q LEGEND DINO R. S. ASTRI ONTARIO LAND SURVEYOR LAND REGISTRAp 184 7HE LAND 11TLEg DIVISION OF / pPR� uON 'ar^ �C Zn ■ DENOTES FOUND suRVEr MONUMENT ly, - OFL GO .L ❑ TZ DENOTES PI. ANTED SURVEY MONUMENT SIMDOE (51). �. \ .9 SIR DENOTES STANDARD IRON BAR 9�r1 s SSIS 2 \°r. DENOTES SHORT STANDARD IRON BAR PLAN OF SURVEY OF PART OF �% � T iB DENOTES IRON BAR eae0aso) Pyi m Ve (n Q WIT H G DENOTES WITNESS LOT 4 PART 1 N\ <y, '�J -x - -x '` DENOTES FENONG (1650) DENOTES DINO R.S. ASTRI. 0.1 S. CONCESSION 4 �3 PI.N. J 740 55 -42 2J 1' (Yt) ° DENOTES ALAN 51R -35260 \ °C� GEOGRAPHIC TOWNSHIP OF ORO cwt PLAN 51R -35260 1 fF` `F s TOWNSHIP OF dR0— MEDONTE ago $ °tis COUNTY OF SIMCOE ow Q �aT& 19 � D 10 20 30 40 50 60" ',,, eglasol PART 1 \ SCALE = 1: 750 RJR, 74055 -0004 \ L O T °� 4 DINO R.S. ASTRI, O.L.S. '9U y PLAN 51R -15202 P A R T a� 3 SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE ~ ° 'P' CERTIFY THAT: PIN 74055 -0224 Yp ! 1) THIS SURVEY PLAN ARC CORRECT AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH ME Subject to ansemm[z oa set wf in Inst. Nos. LRD049 & LT5228J8 �. :\ EYS AC , ACT, THE SURVEYORS ACT AND THE LAND TITLES ACT AND S ACT THE REGULAl10NS MADE UNDER THEM. THE RES /''� C O N C 8 E S S 1 O N 4 \ 2) THE SURVEY WAS COMPLETED ON ME DAY OF PLAN ssW"w� nn°h 51R -30671 U PIN" 2 PS\ a DA Dlrvo R. 5 AsrfU TE h JQ R, y'�� J ONTARIO LAND SURVEYOR DINO ASTRI F I aje BEARING NOTE \ p9 `j n O F, t$sw) BEARINGS ARE ASTRONOMIC AND ARE REFERRED TO THE WESTERLY LIMIT OF PART 1, PLAN SIR-35260 AS SHOWN SUKV0n NG LTD. j b0 ON SAID PLAN AND BEING N3093'4TW. P A R (' is 1 4 \ 1561 Welham Rued, Barrie, Ontario, L4N 087 hryyOO ssrec+cw) s 5 26i METRIC \ Phons: 705- 792 -6780 aIc: 705-792 -0154 WWW.88M81pVe r19.MIT P.LN. FYJ 74055 -0120 DISTANCES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE IN METRES AND sa & +aso) J °q \ CAN BE CONVERTED TO FEET BY OWING BY 0.3048. \ PROJECT7103- DRAWN BY RC CHECKED BY: RG /DRSA 111-AN2 ToNN7 )I Sb ipof Oro-Medonte Engineering Department inspection ReporL/comments for Consent Minor Variance Other File No. -,Y!9 Name of Owner a! JLIIL d.-zs-edLL,� Subject S - -cc-', �— Committee of Adjustment Meeting Date: Keith Mathieson, Director of Engineering & Environmental Services Severance / Minor Variance Review Hearing Date: r Z& Application #:�`00` Owner: MAS #: f,°"✓" Lot #: � Plan #: n� z/ Conc. #: _ "24'r2! -T °l The Township Building Dept. has reviewed this application. ❑ Site inspection required and completed. Proposal appears to meet minimum standards. ❑ Applicant to verify that sewage system meets minimum required setbacks as per Part 8 of the Ontario Building Code. ❑ Comments: Note: This is not approval for any particular development proposal Respectfully submitted, Kim Allen Chief Building Official Township of Oro - Medonte Public Works Department Inspection Report for Consent Minor Variance Other Committee of Adjustment Meeting Date -r 16 l File No.-:�Il )` - �( 5 Name of Owner 3 j �4s Subject Property Date of Inspection Name of Surface of Road 1. Site Lines, Township Road Poor_ Good_ Excellent_ 2. Site Lines, Subject Property Poor_ Good_ Excellent_ Drive 3. Drainage Poor_ Good_ Excellent_ 4. Future Road Widening Required Yes_ No_ If yes, Amount 5. Will Road Surface be adversely affected Yes_ No 6. Future Drive to be located Jerry Ball, Public Works Superintendent Farquharson, Steven From: Marek, Greg l Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2008 8:49 AM To: Farquharson, Steven Subject: RE: Consent Applications Hey Steven, County has no comment for all five applications. Regards, Greg Marek Planner II Phone: 705-726-9300 x1362 APlease consider the environment before printing my email. From: Farquharson, Steven [mailto :sfarquharson @oro- medonte.ca] Sent: Monday, October 06, 2008 2:19 PM To: Marek, Greg Subject: Consent Applications Hpu Crpp, can you please review these applications and provide comments. Four of the applications are easements up in Horseshoe Valley Resort (2008 -B -42 to 2008 -B -45) and the other one is a boundary adjustment in Sugarbush(2008- B -41). Regards, Steven Farquharson,8.URPL Intermediate Planner Township of Oro - Medonte Bus: (705) 487 -2171 Ext: 4239 Fax: (705) 487 -0133 www.oro- medonte.ca This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by VPNetworks(1), and is believed to be clean.