Loading...
04 16 2008 COW AgendaTOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING AGENDA COUNCIL CHAMBERS DATE: WEDNESDAY, APRIL 16, 2008 TIME: 9:00 a.m. 1. NOTICE OF ADDITIONS TO AGENDA 2. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA 3. DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST AND THE GENERAL NATURE THEREOF: - "IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ACT" 4. DEPUTATIONS: None. 5. CONSENT AGENDA: a) Sandra Barker, Co-ordinator, Telecare Orillia Distress Line, correspondence dated April 7, 2008 re: Letter of Appreciation. Staff Recommendation: Receipt. 6. COMMUNICATIONS: a) John Markov, correspondence dated April 2, 2008 re: Markov Oro Station Property Road Allowance Conveyance. b) Kathryn Stephenson, Marketing Manager, City of Orillia, correspondence dated April 7, 2008 re: Beyond the City Lights, Simcoe County Rural Tourism Conference, Casino Rama, April 29, 2008. c) Chief Sharon Stinson Henry, Mnjikaning First Nation, correspondence dated April 8, 2008 re: Information Session on Casino Rama, Thursday, May 22, 2008. d) Frank Prospero, President; Terry Alyman, Chair, Infrastructure Task Group, Parks and Recreation Ontario, correspondence dated March 25, 2008 re: A Call for Action - Recreation, Parks and Sport Infrastructure Funding [additional information available in Clerk's office]. e) Shirley Evans, correspondence dated April 9, 2008 re: Ladies of the Lake. 7. REPORTS OF MEMBERS OF COUNCIL.: a} Mayor H.S. Hughes, re: Lake Simcoe Regional Airport, Grant Application -Build Canada Fund. $. FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION: a) S/Sgt. Dirk Cockburn, Ontario Provincial Police, Barrie Detachment, re: Introduction) General Policing Issues. b) Report No. TR 2008-9, Paul Gravelle, Director of Finance/Treasurer/Deputy CAO, re: Statement of Accounts, March, 2008. 9. PUBLIC WORKS: None. 10. ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES: a) Report No. EES 2008-22, Keith Mathieson, Director of Engineering and Environmental Services re: Point-to-Point Communications Ltd. -Extend Lease Agreement - Horseshoe Valley Water Tower. 11. BUILDING, PLANNING AND BY-LAW ENFORCEMENT: a) Repart No. BP 2008-17, Bruce Hoppe, Director of Building and Planning Services, re: Zoning By-law Amendment for Michael MacVittie, Range 2, Part of Lot 3, 978 Line 2 South & Ron Henderson, Range 2, Part of Lot 3, 892 Line 2 South, (Oro), Township of Oro-Medonte. b) Report No. BP 2008-20, Bruce Hoppe, Director of Building and Planning Services, re: Site Plan Agreement and Removal of Hold, 2008-SPA-01 (Gary & Blanche Johnston), Lot 7, Plan 798 Oro, (Township of Oro-Medonte); Part of Lot 8, Plan 798 (Oro), Township of Ora-Medonte as in RO897948; Except T/W Therein; S/T Execution 95- 03170, if Enforceable; Being all of PIN 58559-0159 (LT), 13 O'Connell Lane. c} Report No. BP 2008-21, Bruce Hoppe, Director of Building and Planning Services, re: Site Plan Agreement and Removal of Hold, 2008-SPA-02 (Barry & Nancy Gardhouse), Lot 28, Plan 626 (Oro), Township of Oro-Medonte, Being all of PIN 74040-0132 (LT), 104 Lakeshore Promenade. d) Report No. BP 2008-22, Bruce Hoppe, Director of Building and Planning Services, re: Zoning By-law Amendment 2008-ZBA-02 (Ron McGowan), Part of Lots 1 & 2, Range 2, 2243 Ridge Road West (Oro), Township of Oro-Medonte. 12. EMERGENCY SERVICES: a) Report No. FD 2008-2, Scott Cowden, Director of Fire and Emergency Services, re: Filling Vacancies -Volunteer Fire Fighters. b) Report No. FD 2008-3, Scott Cowden, Director of Fire and Emergency Services, re: Report on Activities, February, 2008. 13. RECREATION AND COMMUNITY SERVICES: None. 14. IN-CAMERA: a) Doug Irwin, Director of Corporate ServiceslClerk, re: Personal Matter (53 Line 15 South). 15. QUESTIONS FROM THE PUBLIC CLARIFYING AN AGENDA ITEM 16. ANNOUNCEMENTS 17. ADJOURNMENT 4 .. April 7, 200$ J e~~ie f~~i~'~ia. ~i~~r.~3 .C.'.~ce "Qt Je~~C>rcvice - 211e'ae t~ie~ce ~c>.raccde cue cauce~" 24-3Ears~c 1`~i.sfxeab .t.'r`rce~s 7U5-325-9534.7115-~35-3453 Township of Oro-Medonte, l48 Line 7 South, Box 100, Oro Ontario. LOL 2~0 Dear Mr. J. Douglas Irwin, Clerk, On behalf of all the dedicated volunteers of Telecare Orillia plus our Board Members please accept our thanks for your wonderful donation of $50.00. Please find enclosed your receipt #0050 to confirm your wonderful gift. Our personal thanks to you and your wonderful organization. We are a distress line for Orillia and surrounding areas that answers the telephone to troubled and lonely individuals and offers comfort in a non judgmental and anonymous way. We belong to "Lifeline" which is a worldwide distress line and have been in operation in Orillia since 1979. We do not receive any government funding and we are nonprofit with a charitable donation number. Therefore we cannot thank you enough for your financial support and send out to you our appreciation. Yours truly, Sandra D. Barker, Telecare Orillia, Telecare Coordinator _. 170 Colborne Street West • Orillia, ON • L3 i~ 2Z3 Business Offee: 705-327 2383 Email: telecareorillu~soly~ uet Charitable Donation Number 11920 9534 RR0001 ~'>, k-_ i~~^o a _, .. ~~~ - ~:-. 16 B~u-har~i .Avenue RR1 Oro Station, Ontario LOL 2E0 tel: 705-487-0101. email: john.n~a~-k~~~~~u~~~>~zcr~.com X . Apri12, 2008 °~ Mayor and Members of Council - Township of Oro-Medonte ,~ 148 Line 7 South Box 100 .~ Oro, Ontario LOL 2~0 Dear Mayor and Members of Council, Subject. Markov Oro Station Property Road Allowance Conveyance In 2002 my wife and I purchased approximately 50 acres of land in Oro Station which currently consists of 9 lots separated by road allowances. This package of land is part of unregistered plan 606. tie have been seeking to have the road allowances. conveyed back to us since purchasing the property. Council chose not to go forward with this in 2005 due to a planned drainage study in the area. We have now been told by township representatives that we may go forward with the conveyance of the road allowances back to us as the planned drainage study will not be initiated in the immediate future and drainage requirements in the area are currently sufficient. Our property is located just north of Lakeshore Avenue between the 7t~' and 8`h Line at the north end of a number of small side streets -Sophia Avenue, Barbara Avenue, Sunnyside Avenue and Symond Avenue. The property is an irregular shape and amounts to approximately 40 acres {including the road allowances), Our home is built at the end of Barbara Avenue. We are willing to discuss granting an easement{s) to the township to address future drainage requirements in the area. Please let us know how to proceed. ~1nCCTel V, .lohn Markov Message Page 1 cif 1 ~~ From: Binns, Shawn Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 9:33 AM Ta: Irwin, CJoug; Hughes, Harry Subject: FW: Beyond City Lights Registration Attachments: 2008 wordRegistration.doc; 2008 Registration.pdf; Flyer.pdf BEYOND THE CITY LIGHTS SIMCOE COUNTY RURAL TOURISM CONFERENCE CASINO RAMA "'Making a Big Deal of Customer Service"' Tuesday, April 29, 2t}~8 -registration form attached On April 29, 2008 tourism operators, municipal staff, elected officials and tourism associations will gather at Casino Rama to attend the 5th annual Beyond the City Lights -Simcoe County Rural Tourism Conference. Conference organizers are pleased to welcome the following morning speakers: Edward Bryan Wolfenden, Director of National and Corporate Accounts -West Jet Dan Taylor, Economic Development Officer -The Corporation of the County of Prince Afternoon sessions include a partnership success panel, marketing through technology, the art of developing packages for profit.... and more. The current local organizing committee represents leaders in the Simcoe County tourism industry: Ontario's Lake Country, Huronia Tourism Association, Georgian Triangle Tourist Association, Town of Wasaga Beach, Tourism Barrie, The City of Orillia, Ministry of Tourism and Ontario Ministry of Agriculture Foad and Rural Affairs (OMAFRA). Please complete attached registration form and fax back to: Huronia Tourism Association - 705-728-9130 Kathryn Stephenson Marketing Manager City of Oriilia Dept. of Cu/ture & Heritage PH: 705-325-4283 FAX: 705-325-5178 Kstephenson ~ city. oritiia. on. ca RE{a1TRATICJI~ Ft3R~~ Beyond the City LightsTM - Simcoe County Rural Tourism Conference Tuesday, April 29, 2008 - 8:30 am to 3:30 pm Casino Rama, 5899 Rama Road SAVE $10.x0 Now -Register before April 11, 2008 Full day conference -includes lunch and refreshments $75.00/person ($71.43 + $3.57 GST) Limited Seating Available COMPANY NAME: ADDRESS: CITY: POSTAL CODE: PHONE: FAX: EMAIL: CONTACT NAME: SECTOR: ^ Accommodation © Attraction ^ Event ^ Public ^ Service ^ Other AFTERNOON CONCURRENT SESSIONS: SELECT 1 "A" Session & 1 "B" Session Session A: A) Putting Yaur Business On The World Wide Map B) Power of Partnerships -Success Panel C} Tourism Trends and Research -Reaching Yaur Ideal Customer Session B: A} Putting Yaur Business On The World Wide Map B} Recruitment and Retention in Hospitality C} Packaging Far Profit Fax completed registration form to: Huronia Tourism Association Fax: (705) 728-9130 Phone: (?05) 726-8502 Email: htaCsimcoe.ca Payment Options: Amount: ^ Invoice ^ Credit Card {complete information below) ^ y1SA ^ MASTERCARD Expiry: Card #: Cardholders Name: Signature: Registration & Cancellation Policy Due to limited seating registration must be pre-paid. Regrettably, we are unable to offer any refunds; however substitution is welcomed at any time. I consent to my name, companylassociation and contact information being used for future conference mailings: ^ YES ^ NO For further information: .~ *~~~ hfi" ~ ~.4 ~ y ;, '7 t~ ~' ¢~. 3 i ,. ~ ~ ~~~~ _,' _~ ~4, i' .- i i, ~,., ~ y }.,, ~ ,. Tuesday April ~9, 20Q8 Casino Rama C~ 5899 Rama Road 8:30am to 4:OOpm + f~ ;'';:7~' ~ 1. '~; PUI`I;ii?7 ~L'€?IOTI (Zt _°_: ~ -; "y L, ~ .. << <~ ~.~,c.~t~zp~ V• ,t v ..~ .. ... .. ~..~«z s..s .tx .. u... ?~1 ~~~~n~~e ~~~~~~r Bryan Wolfenden, Exceptional GuesC Experience -Going Above and Beyond 4t ~~e suet, c°u~to~€~~° service is tc~;et~d~€;9 ~~ri :eta !c~~, ~b tft€~it~ js~t~s. Er~a~~ ~,tVc~~~'er~~'~n ~vitl ;~~~tr e 3~E ~~~ ~t~~v ~r'~~~t~et i~~s ~~ _,, ; c~ a <,r = ~ ~ r~~e ~~r~d ct,~~-it E~rifh~,~ t?teit" c:t:~l2~~:~rry tl~<~t ins~~~r~s ,~tic:~ ,~~~ii. ,~,:~ ~,r,3~. 4~li"t {`C'~iTdl. ; `I:'~:~'C)C,'~': ~3C3'Lh7 t11~S '.`f}Y~Sdtl~'' ~1~5 ~ro'~~'I~, i,_';31"1I .:~ .-[1L '~'i'i.r >i„3 1 ,. . ,`~u ~; r~~;~E St~TT1~' t~~~S~z~at~€~~ c~I~ ll~~' 6~:~~' ~ ~,'1,~€:''a>;h~2 ~!i~C~ ~c~-~n;c ,?<ers tc~ ~~E~er -- xce~ti€~nal se~°vice f~c~r ~;~o~~r ~;~t~sts ~:;~ vtsitc~! >. i ~.r' 1 ~. 1 ~> yyYI ~1~ MNJIKANING ~G FIRST NATION ,~~ ilpril 8, ?008 Mayor Harry Hughes ~ Council Township of Oro-Medonte Soh I00, 148 Line 7 South Oro, Ontario LOI. ?40 Re: Information Session on Casino Rama, Thursday, May 22, 200$ Dear Mayor Hughes & Council, Office ~ Ih~ C~ie~ aad C~~il Plc-asr accept this invitation to join Rama ;ti-injikaning First Nation Chicf and Council f>r an infotniation session un Casin<~ Rama. Over the past few gears, there have been a variety of media reports, remarks and private interviews concerning the current status and future of Casino Rama. As we all. know, Casino Rama is a major part of the economy in Simcoe North. It serves as a major employer to approximately 3,500 employees. It provides a toarism attraction which generates thousands of visitors on a daily basis. Its employees are major consumers in the region and Casino Rama, itself, is a major purchaser of goods and services throughout the area supporting many businesses. We look forward to meeting with you again in the spirit of unity and common interest in ensuring Casino Rama continues to prosper for the economic benefit of this region and all stakeholders. To do so in a meaningful way, we must continue to acknowledge the positive impacts of Casino Rama and the importance of ensuring its continued healthy performance. We invite you to join us for this information session to be held on Thursday, May 22, 2008 in the Anishnaabe Ballroom at the Casino Rama Entertainment Centre. Social 5:30 to 6:00 p.m. Dinner C:00 to 7:00 p.m. Presentation and discussion 7:00 to 9:00 p.m. Please confirm your attendance with Cathy Edney by Man Rah, 2008 at 325-3611 est. 1416. We look forward to welcoming you to our community. Sincerely, ~~~~ ~~ Chief Sharon Stinson Henry c.c. Rama Mnjikaning First Nation Council APR ~ ~i ~00~ ORS-i~EDO~JTE T0~1/NSHIC' _ 5884 Rama Road, Suite 200, Rama, Ontario LOK I TO • (705) 325-361 I • Fax (705) 325-0879 A proud progressive lYative corr~r>rrunity Government Office Public Works Health Centre Lands & Membership Seniors Complex Waste Water Treatment Centre Fax: 325-0879 Fax: 327-5586 fax: 329-0613 Fax: 325-9664 Fax: 327-5823 Fax: 326-8669 Mnjikaning Ifendaaswin Social Services Fire Department Education Water Treatment Centre Facilities Management Elementary School Fax: 329-3067 Fax: 325-9528 Fax: 326.2146 Fax: 325-1092 327-7697 Fax: 327-7029 -- ~- _ Parks and Recreation Ontario ~ ~ ~ y ~~ ~~~' g 3 11 SS E Linton Avenue East, Suite 406 ~ ~ r ~~~ Toronto, ON M3C 3C6 www.prontario.org BAR ~ ~ ~~~8 March 25, 2008 ORO_~E~ONTE TO THE ATTENTION OF: Mayors and Municipal Cou oils TO~NNSHIP ~~ _ RE: A Call For Action -Recreation, Parks and Sport Infrastructure Funding In response to our municipal members and stakeholders concerns around aging infrastructure, Parks and Recreation Ontario (PRO) is actively involved with the McGuinty Government to leverage additional funding to address the reported parks, recreation, and sport infrastructure gap that is creating significant financial pressures on municipalities across the province. Parks and Recreation Ontario (PRO) has released a report entitled Investing in Healthy and Active Ontarians through Recreation and Parks Infrastructure (enclosed), which identifies that in 2006 Ontario municipalities reported a $5 Billion dollar infrastructure deficit in Arenas, Community Centres, and Swimming Pools alone. More importantly the report provides compelling data and recommendations that support an increased investment in parks, recreation, and sport infrastructure to address the growing problem of inactivity and obesity among Ontarians. During the 2008 pre-budget consultations with the Honourable Dwight Duncan, Minister of Finance, PRO advocated for dedicated funding for recreation, parks and sport infrastructure, requesting $400 million per year for the next five years (attached). You should know that in response to PRO's presentation, Minister Duncan stated that the government had not received a strong indication from local government that community sport, recreation and parks infrastructure funding is a priority. The attached report suggests otherwise. Parks and Recreation Ontario understands' that municipalities face infrastructure challenges in all asset categories. It is not our intent to suggest that one particular asset is more important than another. Our request for action is for municipalities to send a clear message to the Province that sport and recreation infrastructure is indeed an important part of the overall infrastructure envelope. In light of recent announcements from the McGuinty Government regarding infrastructure funding -including the MIII, and a proposed new Bill to direct future surpluses to Municipal Infrastructure, it is important that the Province understands the full scope of the municipal infrastructure challenge. As such, we invite you to join other municipalities across the province to send a message that ensures that your community's sport and recreation infrastructure is effectively accounted for and eligible for future funding priorities. We encourage you to read the report and consider how your community could benefit from improved recreation and parks infrastructure. Mayors and Council are the most influential leaders to send a clear message to the McGuinty Government and more specifically to the Minister of Finance, the Honourable Dwight Duncan, and Minister of Public Infrastructure Renewal, the Honourable David Caplan, that annual funding for recreation and parks infrastructure is a priority for citizens in your community. To assist you in this regard, please find enclosed summary data, as well as a list of key officials that your Council resolutions could be distributed to. We thank you in advance for your efforts in building a more active and vibrant community. Sincerely, ~~ ~~ Frank Prospero, President, Parks and Recreation Ontario Terry Alyman, Chair, Infrastructure Task Group ~aUon o,:~:a7,.. a a Parks and Recreation Ontario ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ 1185 Eglinton Avenue East, Suite 406 ("~ -~ ~' ~ _ ! ~. Toronto, ON M3C 3C6 www.prontano.org Additional Information on Sport, Recreation and Parks Infrastructure • Ontarians need to become more physically active in order to counteract the "obesity epidemic." • Ontarians need access to quality recreation facilities in order to maintain a healthy lifestyle. • Ontario's sport, recreation and parks infrastructure is in a state of physical decline. The vast majority of publicly owned recreation facilities were built between 1956 and 1980; and are nearing the end of their useful life. • A total of 424 major facilities in 255 different municipalities are at or beyond their useful life and likely candidates for imminent capital rehabilitation with an estimated price tag of $5 billion. • PRO recognizes that municipalities are faced with many infrastructure challenges and difficult decisions must be made. We also recognize that programs such as the recent Municipal Infrastructure Investment Initiative (MIII) do not meet the needs of municipalities because the funding is not ongoing, the deadlines are very short, and the criteria for construction-ready projects can be problematic from an overall timing perspective. • As a leader in your municipality, PRO knows that you share our concern over the current state of sport, recreation and parks infrastructure and understand the value that high quality assets bring to your community. We know this because 70°Io of municipalities, representing 90% of the population in the province, responded to our research. • Given the addition of parks and recreation as a service area identified for measurement within the Provincial MPMP program, it is recognized that spending in this area within Ontario municipalities is one of the largest areas of spending within municipal budgets. This fact reinforces the need to ensure that sport, recreation and parks infrastructure are considered along with all other pressing municipal infrastructure needs such as roads, transit, schools and hospitals. Page 1 c,f 1 ~. Irwin, Doug From: Shirley Evans Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 12:16 PM To: Irwin, Doug Subject: Ladies of the Lake Dear Mr, Irwin, Thank you for your letter of April 3, 2008 in which you state that the Township of Oro-Medonte was unable to approve the funding request from the Ladies of the Lake. We realize that the council gets many requests for funding and is unable to grant all of them. The Township of Oro-Medonte would be eligible as a not for profit organization to buy our 2009 calendar at a 50°I° discount plus GST and offer them far sale in the Township's offices for the reatil price of $15.00. I would appreciate it if you could bring my request to the attention of the Township council. I look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, Shirley Evans for the Ladies of the Lake. n in«nno ~ ~E ~~U THE CORPORATION OF THE ;t kit ~' i; ~~..<u~~,a 3? _- p ~ ~,~ ~ ~ --- OF ~~~-.<~ ti ,,,~ April 3, 2008 Ms. Shirley Evans 27 Greenwood Forest Road RR#1 Oro Station, ON LOL 2E0 Dear Ms. Evans, ~e~~ 148 Line 7 S., Box 100 Oro, Ontario LOL 2X0 Phone (705) 487-2171 Fax (705) 487-OI33 www.oro-medonte.ca Further to your correspondence, Council, during the 2008 budget deliberations, considered your funding request with respect to sponsoring your 2009 Calendar. Council received numerous requests for grants and donations from various organizations within and outside the Township. Each group is worthy of recognition for their contribution towards the enhancement of our communities. At this time, Council was unable to approve your funding request but we wish your organization much success. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the Township office. Yours truly, ~~ ~~ --~r~ J. Douglas Irwin Clerk cc: Members of Council Paul Gravelle, Treasurer Encl. /It ~G- Tr~n~ rk fir~r~sporta '~' ~a~ ~~ ~~~~ THE HONOURABLE LAWRENCE CANNON MINISTER OF TRANSPORT, INFRASTRUCTURE AND COMMUNITIES FOLLOW-UP TO BUSINESS PLAN SUBMITTED BY LSRA COMMISSION TO DISCUSS EXPANSION OF THE LAKE SIMCOE REGIONAL AIRPORT AS SUBMITTED BY THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE • ~ 4 ; ~;; :.~ '; s Table of Contents Meeting Attendees ............................................3 Area Map ..................................................4 Addressing Letter, April 11, 2008 .......................5 Appendix 1 -Letter and Business Plan for the Lake Simcoe Regional Airport Appendix 2 - Table 6 7Q MEETING ATTENDEES Canada Ca~ac~ Ct~tdc~. Honourable Lawrence Cannon, Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities Ms. Ana Curic, Special Assistant, Minister's Office Ms. Stephanie L. Machel, Senior Policy Advisor, Minister's Office Mr. Bruce Stanton ~t , -~£ ~. ~~ ~L ~ MP, Simcoe North ~~~~~ ~~~- Mr. Patrick Brown MP, Barrie .~ ~~, ~~,, His Worship Harry Hughes, Mayor ~~ _ t~ i~ r~ 7 ~~ ~~~ Mr. Robin Dunn, Chief Administrative Officer *~= T ~ r ~1~.) ORO-eVIEDONTE :: T BARRIE ~l ~ , ,~, ~ -,. y. ,~ si ' => ti ~, "f ~~~~ ~ . ._ ~ ~~ OE ~~~ THE CORPO(tATION OF THE ~G ` - ~~~ _ 148 Line 7 5., Box 100 ~~--- - ~,, _i ~ Oro, Ontario LOL 2X0 ~_ ~ ~ ~ rr~o~,e ~~os, 48r-21 ~ i ~~~~Z ~'~~~N~~III~ Fax (705} 487-Ot 33 ~` ~ ~~ www.oro-medonte.ca ~ ~~ April 11, 2008 The Honourable Lawrence Cannon Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities Tower C - 330 Sparks St. Ottawa, ON K1 A ON5 Honourable Minister: The accompanying submission is being presented for your review and consideration by delegates from the Corporation of the Township of Oro- Medonte. The Members of this delegation wish to present to the Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities the positive economic impact on the Oro- Medonte Township and surrounding area through the expansion of the Lake Simcoe Regional Airport. In reference to Appendix 1, the Business Plan submitted by the Lake Simcoe Regional Airport Commission to Minister Cannon, supports the Federal government's program initiatives along with new business to both the airport as well as the neighbouring municipalities through the growth of a regional aerospace centre of excellence. The benefits of investing in the Lake Simcoe Regional Airport range from increased economic activity to increased assessment/jobs to meeting the Economic Development objectives of (1) attracting new businesses; (2) supporting existing businesses; and (3) encouraging entrepreneurship. Appendix 2 examines the benefits of attracting companies to the LSRA by estimating the impact of these operations on the regional economy, and specifically, by examining the following: (1) direct and indirect payroll, (2) direct and indirect job creation and (3) the potential municipal property tax revenue. We are seeking your Ministry support to facilitate the process of the Lake Simcoe Regional Airport expansion. Yours respectfully, H. S. Hughes, Mayor Township of Oro-Medonte s= Lak~i~~c~e Regionallkirport ~n~„e 705.487.0999 fax 705.487,1411 224 Line 7 North, RR#2 C7ro Station, Ontario LOL 2E0 CANADA February 27, 2008 Simeoe North MP Bruce Stanton House of Commons Room 702, Justice Building E C Ottawa, Ontario K 1 A OA6 RE: Lake Simeoe Regional Airport ~,.~w_ ~ __y~___, dear Mr. Stanton: I would like to thank you for taking the time to meet with members of the Lake Simeoe Regional Airport Commission, municipal Mayors and Administrators as well as representation for your Federal counter- part, MP Patrick Brawn and the provincial representative, Simeoe North MPP Ga~eld Dunlop. The general tone and atmosphere of the meeting was certainly positive as we are all very eager to proceed with the application process. As discussed, the Lake Simeoe Regional Airport does indeed play an imperative role to the focal economy and the greater whole of Simeoe County. Furthermore, the member municipality's ongoing support and recent investments of more than $2,000,000 at the airport demonstrates a commitment to work with the senior levels of government to realize further investment into this imperative transportation infrastructure. A relevant development during the past couple of years has been the rapid growth of the area in terms of population and industry as the Greater Toronto Area spreads out. Unlike other airports of comparable size and makeup within the same area; the Lake Simeoe Regional Airport is located an a major transportation corridor {Highway 11/400} which allows fora 45 minute drive to Toronto. This puts it well within the drive times of other significant reliever airports such as Hamilton International and the Region of Waterloo International airports. The LSRA is boated in an area that would allow for easy expansion and also has a significant area available for industrial type development with close access to the airport boundaries. With that in mind, the Lake Simeoe Regional Airport Commission is pleased to submit a Business Plan to Minister Lawrence Cannon through your offices, which dovetails with the Federal government's program initiatives. On behalf of the Lake Simeoe Regional Airport Commission and the partnering municipalities, !would like to thank you once again for your support and involvement, of which we trust, will be of great assistance as we continue to work towards a funding package. Please do not hesitate to contact me at 705-835-2445 or through the airport at 705-487-0999 or info(c~lakesimcoeairpart com if you have any questions. We look forward to your favorable response in the near future. www.lakesimcoeairport.COm Sincerely, Lake Simcoe Regional Airport len leach, President lake Simcoe Regional Airport Commission cc Barrie MP P. Brawn Simcoe North MPP G, Dunlop Barrie MPP A. Carroll City of Barrie Mayor & City Administrator City or Orillia Mayor & City Manager Township of Oro-Medonte Mayor & CAO lake Simcoe Regional Airport Commission Encl. ~r~r www.lakesimcoeairport.cam Building a Stronger Economy Lake Simcoe Regional Airport Development Plan Prepared for: Minister Lawrence Cannon C~ MAR 0 G 2~~8 ORO-t~EDONTE TOWNSHEP ~~ - Introduction ', A strong economy is essential to maintaining Canada's competitiveness and long-term prosperity for Canadians' -whether they live in large cities or smaN communities. Modern, efficient and reliable infrastructure supports commerce, creates employment opportunities and attracts skilled knowledge workers -boosting our communities' growth and competitiveness. Funding from Building Canada and other federal programs aimed at the Lake Simcoe Regional Airport {LSRA) will contribute to increased trade, efficient movement of goods and people, economic growth ' ' through priorities such as: increasing the size and scope of the airport to allow safer and better utilization • Encourage business development at the airport • Open new opportunities to create Gateways and Gross Border avenues The City of Barrie, Township of Oro-Medonte and City of Orieia share the vision of Building Canada by building a stronger, safer and better Canada through modern world-class public infrastructure. Investment in LSRA is a critical component needed to grow our local economy. ' The further development of the airport structure will serve to benefit not only those communities mentioned above but also the surrounding area of Simcoe County as it grows and takes its rightful place in the travel infrastructure that will serve Greater Toronto and its environs. As can be seen further along in this plan, the airport even at the present level of development has become an important facility not only in serving the basic needs of travel and commerce in the area, but also as a staging area for crucial infrastructure requirements such as regional policing efforts, provincial hydro facility monitoring and maintenance, and abusiness- essential customs and revenue port of entry. Background The LSRA is one of the newest and best positioned regional airports in Canada. Centrally located less than 20 minutes from either Barrie or Orillia, it boasts a 1,524 m. (5,000 ft.} long lighted runway capable of handling a broad range of aircraft including helicopters and commercial jet aircraft . Services include: public terminal building, car park, aviation fuel (100 LL and Jet-A}, aircraft parking, lease areas for hangars and navigation aids. The LSRA offers Port of Entry status, and Canada Customs facilities far all in-bound international flights. The airport currently has one large hanger owned and operated by Weatherwise Aviation and completion of a second modern hanger and maintenance facility to house Ontario Nydro (helicopter Division} is close to completion. It also boasts a number of smaller hangers/offices that are either privately owned and . operated ar managed by the LSRA staff. Both the airport operators and Weatherwise Aviation have invested significant time and resources into expanding opportunities at the airport and for Weatherwise this has included significant investment in the construction of the present hangers as well as proposed plans far subsequent hangers as needs of the airport users and business development dictate. The airport caters to a wide clientele which includes local industry and entertainment venues, Department of National Defence, Ontario Provincial Police, RCMP, Ministry of Health (critical air ambulance flights) and Ontario Hydra. The LSRA offers these users a convenient location in Central Ontario, in close proximity to both the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) and Northern Ontario and is attracting increasing attention from both these and other types of users as well as airplane manufacturing companies that are seeking a location where they can manufacture and fly their product out of. Immediate major highway access, a sufficient quantity of surrounding developable industrial land and a strong political will for development on the part of the three communities involved are all major selling points when it comes to . marketing the airport's se4rvices. The LSRA is jointly owned by the City of Barrie, the City of Orillia and the Township ofOro-Medonte. The operation of the airport has been entrusted to the LSRAC, which is responsible for the management, operation, maintenance and improvement of the LSRA. The terms under which the three municipalities agree to own and operate the airport are set forth in a document entitled the "Lake Simcoe Regional Airport Agreement". The Parties have agreed that all monies contributed far the maintenance, operation, capital or borrowing charges attributed to the LSRA are based an each municipality's share of assessment base as a portion of the three municipalities total assessment base and is currently derived using 2001 assessment values. The percentage factors currently used are as follows: Barrie - 67.22%, Orillia -16.32% and Oro-Medonte -16.46%. The LSRAC consists of 9 members -the membership is comprised of three representatives of each respective Party. The Parties have agreed that such representative members of each Party must consist of at least one elected official and at least one non-elected (citizen} resident of each respective appointing municipality. The LSRAC membership has traditionally been comprised of two elected officials and one non-elected resident of each respective appointing municipality. The LSRAC is responsible far the preparation and submission of a budget, operational, capital and including reserve transfers on an annual calendar year basis for the approval of each of the Parties. The airport's entire lands consist of 240.4 hectares {594 acres}. While a majority of these lands are reserved for airport operational requirements {i.e. runways, taxiways, navigational aids, parking, aprons, etc.}, the Master Plan does identify three (3}specific Commercial Development Areas, each of which are phased developments. The areas are as follows: 1. Landside Development Area is located in the extreme south eastern part of the airport site, south ' of the airport main access road. The area available for commercial uses comprises a grass area of 4.0 hectares {9.9 acres) -this area does not have airside access, nor is it presently serviced. 2. South West Commercial Development Area is a designated airside development zone located in the south west quadrant of the airport. This area is broken into to primary phases -phase 1 encompasses five 0.4 hectares {1 acre} serviced lots. Phase 2 encompasses ten approximately 0.6 hectares {1.5 acre} lots for a cumulative total of approximately 8.1 hectares {20 acres). Please note that the Phase 2 fats are currently un-serviced, raw land. To date, Lots 1, 3 & 4 of phase 1 of the South West Commercial Development Area have been developed -lots 2 & 5 have been sold to Weatherwise Aviation with developments pending. 3. North East Commercial Development Area offers the opportunity to create an extensive commercial development in the north east of the property with a total area of approximately 24.6 hectares {60 acres}. The Airport Master Plan has designated this area restricted to airside usages which could include aviation maintenance and repair businesses, specialty aircraft manufacturers and retinishers, parts and component repairs and aircraft hangar of various types. The site is presently raw, un-serviced lands. There is one, small 743 square metres. (8,000 square feet) hangar located in what could be described as the North East Commercial Development Area {located immediately east of the airport's north apron) and is presently engaged in a land lease agreement. The hangar is situated on approximately 0.2 hectares {0.5 acres) and is owned by Weatherwise Aviation -this hangar could be moved/dismantled, in consideration of large scale developments such as a large MRO or modification center establishing its business at the airport. The airport has two (2}fee structures with respect to land: 1. Land Lease revenue -this fee is applied to leased lands. At present, the airport is engaged in two land lease agreements, bath with Weatherwise Aviation. The current blended fee structure {land lease & MIT} ranges from $2.69 per square metres. {$0.25 per square foot}, per annum to $3.23 per square metre {$0.30 per square foot) per annum, based on the lot size. All property taxes applied to structures on leased land are considered additional charges and not included in the fee structure. The Land Lease fee is all encompassing to the airport property as it directly relates to the operation of the airport and does not include maintenance to the lessee's individual lots}. 2. Airport Maintenance Charge {AMC) revenue -this fee is applied to lands said at the airport and was created to maintain income in perpetuity {in lieu of land lease fee). The current fee structure is $1.61 per square metres ($0.15 per square foot) per annum, based on the lot size. The AMC is all encompassing to the airport property as it directly relates to the operation of the airport and does not include maintenance to the purchaser's individual lot(s). As the lands are sold, titled properties, any land tax assessments are filed directly to the land owner and co8ected by the Township of Oro-Medonte. ~, The LSRA's current tenants, including size and employment, are as follows: ^ Hydro One Helicopter Networks - 813 square metres (8,750 square foot) hangar and office, 12 employees - located in Weatherwise Aviation facility - Lat 1 of Phase 1 of SW Commercial Development Area. • Firestorm Turbines - 362 square metre {3,900 square feet) shared hangar space and office, 4 employees - Co-located in a 743 square metre {8,000 square foot) Weatherwise Aviation facility - NE Gommercial Development Area. • Aero Covers - 362 square metres (3,900 square foot) shared hangar space and office, 4 employees - Co-located in 743 square metre (8,000 square foot) Weatherwise Aviation facility - NE Commercial Development Area. • TransGlabal Aviation - 19 square metre (200 square foot) office, 2 employees - Co-located in 743 square metre (8,000 square foot) Weatherwise Aviation facility - NE Commercial Development Area. • Canadian Flyers International - 104 square metre {1,120 square foot) office space, 3.5 employees -located in Airport Terminal Building. • Future Air - 60 square metre {650 square foot} office space, 3 employees - located in Airport Terminal Building. • Georgian Bay Helicopter (GBH} inc. - 9 square metre (100 square foot) office space, 1 employee - located in Airport Terminal Building. This firm also stores 1 helicopter in one of the Weatherwise Aviation facilities. ^ Ontario Provincial Police - 23 square metre (250 square foot) office space, 4 employees (officers}, space serves as the base of operations for the newly established air traffic services program -located in Airport Terminal Building. The OPP also stares the new traffic services aircraft in one of the Weatherwise Aviation facilities. The largest Weatherwise Aviation facility located on Lots 3 & 4 (now merged) of the SW Commercial Development Area has 2,973 square metres {32,000 square feet} of rentable space. Approximately 1,486.5 square meters (16,000 square feet} of this hangar is currently rented out to individual aircraft owners (both private and commercial}. The remaining 1,486.5 square meters (16,000 square feet} is presently vacant, although the space is used on a regular basis by transient aircraft (mostly corporate/executive aircraft). A soon-ta-be completed Hydra-One facility to house helicopter services which monitor and maintenance Ontario's central and eastern grids is also being built and owned by Weatherwise Aviation... This facility will be 1050 square meters (12,000 square feet) and will serve as a dispatch and main#enance facility far the helicopter operation. 111 Central Ontario - A Centre far Aviation Vision To develop the LSRA and building a stronger, safer and better Canada through modem world- class public infrastructure. To develop LSRA as a Centre of Excellence for maintenance, repair, assembly, manufacturing, and related services far the aerospace industry. To properly position the LSRA to assume the role as a major reliever airport alternative to the GTA as the region grows and develops. Canada's Aerospace Industry Canada's aerospace industry comprises 400+ firms in every region of the country; collectively they employ 80,000 Canadians. Since 1990, Canadian aerospace industry sales have more than doubled, reaching $22 billion in 2002. Aerospace is Canada's leading advanced technology exporter, exporting nearly 80% of its output. Canadian firms are global market leaders in regional aircraft, business jets, commercial helicopters, small gas turbine engines, flight simulation, landing gear, and space applications. They are also globally competitive sources of supply for: ^ Airframe structural assemblies; ^ Wing structure assemblies; • Power conversion and distribution systems; ^ Integrated electronic controls; ^ Environmental conditioning systems; ^ Air traffic control and management systems; ^ Communications systems; and, • Maintenance, repair and overhaul services. Canadian aerospace firms offer globally competitive, innovative solutions backed by sustained investment in R&D and a highly skilled workforce. Qntario is one of the leading jurisdictions within Canada for aerospace manufacturing as evidenced by the $4 billion in revenue earned and the 23,000 plus persons employed by mostly mid-sized companies in the Province. Exports account for 77% of revenue and 86°1a of exports are to the United States. The aerospace industry is one of the sectors targeted by the Province in their investment attraction initiatives and they are actively working to strengthen and enlarge the amount of activity in the sector. At the loco! level, there are a number of companies that manufacture products for the aerospace industry. The most notable of these is Unison Engine Components (a division of GE Aviation), which is located in C}rillia. Unison Engine Components is a manufacturer of precision machined components for jet aircraft engines. They currently employ over 200 employees and occupy 8,918 square metres (96,000 square feet}. in the past year, Unison Engine Components has grown significantly through a 5,202 square metre (56,000 square foot} expansion and has more than doubled their number of employees. In addition to Unison Engine Components, there are a number of smaller manufacturing and related companies located at both the LSRA and the various airports located throughout the area. 4utloak for the Aerospace Industry The aerospace industry is presently enjoying unprecedented growth and sustainability following what was arguably the deepest economic crisis the industry has ever experienced. The cause of this economic calamity was the "the perfect storm" of various events, some within the industry and others outside the industry but having a ripple effect nonetheless. Prior to 9/11, airlines were already in a financial quagmire as a result of increased labour costs due to legacy labour agreements, rising maintenance and fuel costs and lower yields which were a direct result of over capacity in the system. Add this to the events of 9/11, terrorism on a global scale and increased communicable disease concerns. ParaNeiing all of the above were efforts by the government (certainly in Canada but not exclusively} to further download costs normally addressed with the use of general treasury funds (security costs, airport improvement fees, charges for airspace use, airport rents, etc.) and the whale airline transportation system was on the brink and resulted in the restructuring of several major airlines including Air Canada. These restructurings allowed for the relief from some of the legacy costs that had evolved and also allowed for the new concept of low cost airlines which was the new and improved model for airline management. The result of all this is the airline industry world that we presently live in -lean, mean and customer orientated. The margins are thin, costs have to be controlled and the regulatory environment has to be contained. However, on the positive side the system is now sustainable. In addition to this, Canada has a growing and improving economy with GDP growth forecasted to hover between 2.5 -3.0% per year and Personal Reai Disposable Income forecasted to gnaw at about 1.5% per year (Statistics Canada). Population growth is forecast to grow at a rate of about 1.5% per year ahead of °replacement rate" (in and out of the effective job markets}. What do these statistics mean? Essentially, economic growth is increasing in a sustainable manner. Statistics Canada forecasts project almost 16% growth in domestic passenger service by the year 2009, which represents growth from 55 million passengers in 2001 to 64 minion passengers in 2009. Along with this, there would be dramatic increases in the number of trans-border and international passengers carried in the same period of time. The increase in cargo during the next ZO year period is expected to be in the 4-9% per year range, which will lead to capacity strain and an increased requirement to expand to meet these new needs. While the above statistics would seem to indicate a bright future for the aerospace industry, it is important to note that a significant portion of the growth and profitability projected is directly dependant upon the efficiency and cost effectiveness of product delivery vis-~-vis the new law cast model. Prior to this, airlines depended on breakeven load factors that might have been in the high 40 to low 50% range with real average load factors sitting in the low 60% range. Currently, breakeven load factors are much higher and are sitting at 75 to 80% with actual load factors in the mid-eighties range. This applies whether the company is an Air Canada size company or a "mom and pop" operation and this is particularly true an the cost side of the equation. With all of the above there is a growing need far support services for the airline industry. There is a current trend far larger airiine operations to outsource much of the heavier type of checks on their aircraft, and only support in-house line and regular maintenance. This allows the airline to concentrate its capital budget on the operational side and expense the maintenance on an ongoing basis. Another driver in this equation is that the equipment and facilities necessary for carrying out most of the major inspections ar instaAing kits/upgrades require highly specialized tooling and personnel This means a capital outlay for what is essentially a one time event for an airline. Hence, it is more cost efficient in the long run to contract this work ou#. As mentioned above, airlines traditionally carried out all of this work, and therefore the business case was made for the support facilities to be located at least at one of the airports that the airiine served, whether it be scheduled passenger service or cargo service. With the new model, and the rents and costs associated with being located on a large airport, a niche has opened up for these Maintenance Repair Organizations {MROs) to be located at smaller airport facilities where rents and taxes are more in line with their particular business model and their needs. There are presently a number of examples of these MRO's in Canada {e.g. Excel-Tech at Montreal Dorval, Mid Canada Mod Center at Toronto Pearson, f MP Aerospace at Halifax, Air Canada Technical Services in both Winnipeg and Montreal Dorval, etc.} and as the requirement to reduce cost increases, the outsourcing trend seems to be accelerating. These companies are also a potential source of clients far the t.SRA as many of these outsourcing companies still have operations at the higher cast airports. As far as the infrastructure requirements for airports seeking to meet these outsourcing needs, all that is required is an airport facility that has a runway of at least 1,800 m. {5,905 ft.} with a reasonable navigation and approach facility, and available industrial land to build upon. Of course, other concerns would be appropriate work farce availability, or at the very least, the ability to aftract or train that specialized workforce. The cost of outsourced maintenance dictates that the maintenance company run a very cost efficient operation, and since few of the amenities that are available at an airport such as the Pearson International Airport {Toronto) are really needed or utilized by the operation, it does not make business sense to be paying higher rents and taxes to be located there. In addition to this, as more airiine operations come into being and require additional runway slots and facilities, there is increased upward ` pressure on both lease rates and other airport fees. In this scenario, it makes more sense to have the maintenance and overhaul facilities located at a smaller and under-utilized airport. The three most significant factors for companies considering relocating from a major airport to a regional airport are: 1. The physical infrastructure of the airport; 2. Suitable existing facilities or the ability to finance the construction of a new facility that meets these companies' needs; and, 3. A qualified and wail trained workforce. Based an conversations with various industry professionals, the report's authors believe that the LSRA and its partner municipalities are well positioned to meet the needs of these companies and assist in their relocation to the airport. Although the physical infrastructure of the airport has not been expanded to serve significant growth at this time, the basic infrastructure foundation is in place and this provides a starting paint. As the purpose of this report is to consider the additional infrastructure investments necessary to attract these companies to the LSRA, no additional discussion of the infrastructure requirements will be mentioned here. Instead, these will be detailed in the investment Required section of the report. in terms of existing facilities, the LSRA currently does not have a building that could meet the needs of these companies as they would typically require a building that is much larger than the current facilities, which provide for a maximum of 2,973 square metres (32,000 square feet}. However, the LSRA is fortunate to have a relationship with Weatherwise Aviation as they have a proven track record in terms development at LSRA and have made along-term commitment to the airport through their investments there. Weatherwise Aviation and their parent company, Weatherwise (t1K} Limited are a multi-national company specializing in the design, procurement and installation of the entire building envelope for industrial, commercial and public buildings. Weatherwise Aviation is an expert in providing solutions for companies in the aerospace sector and has extensive experience in doing so. Weatherwise also offers companies the choice of either having them construct a building far the client or to actually finance a design/build option far lease back to the company. The relationship with Weatherwise provides the LSRA with the ability to meet the needs of these outsourcing companies and thereby attract them to the airport. in terms of labour force, the Central Ontario area has a number of aerospace manufacturing or related companies that could serve as an initial source of empioyrnent for companies relocating to the LSRA. The strength of the area's automotive sector also provides a source of labour as there are many similarities and overlaps between the two industries in terms of advanced manufacturing skills. In addition to this, there have been a number of manufacturing closures in recent years and these would also serve as a pool of skilled labour. Lastly, Georgian College could serve as a labour supply through their many advanced manufacturing graduates as weN as their corporate training programs that could provide the specialized ski8s necessary far workers in the aerospace industry. With regards to the potential of recruiting other companies to establish their operations at the LSRA, there are two important factors to consider. Firstly, the focus should not be just on the Greater Toronto Area (GTA} but also on outlying areas. The LSRA not only offers a suitable location for companies exiting the GTA, but also provides an excellent location for companies that are currently located same distance from the GTA, but who would benefit from a closer proximity to it, while realizing cost advantages and an excellent quality of life. Secondly, the LSRA offers development opportunities that are not generally available at other airports in South/Centrai Ontario. The LSRA Commission has recently contacted the Ministry of Transport highlighting the airports crucial location to the GTA, and requested that the airport be given due consideration in the Ministry's latest efforts to study and plan for transportation infrastructure growth over the next 10 years. The LSRA and its funding partners have a unique opportunity far development because of the lower costs offered at the airport, facility availability, direct highway access and the quality of life available in the partner communities. This window of opportunity is only available for a short time and should be pursued aggressively. i'V Growth Ongortuni#ies Within the Lake Simcoe Regional Airport Master Plan three areas have been designated for commercia( ` deveEopment being the South West Commercial Area, the North East Commercial Area and the ~andside Commercial Area, see Figure 1. Lake Simcoe Regional Airport DEVELOPMENT PLAN _.,~,~. . F _.~~~ ,, ~` ~i~it~nalrr `,~ ``~ uoen `, co~sni \ '~ F% r ~`~ ~, ~, FIGURE t 1V. C' _ _ _ ~" ,` ~~ _ _ mw--- w~ ®_ ~- `\ ` V ~.~.y~C.~/u. / ARE' i ~' COAAffiRC7AL ARP.1 .` •' EXISTING DEVELOPMENT i Lake Simcoe Regional Airport DEVELOPMENT PLAN _~~._ ~~~ ~ i r~ ~Y ~~ ~_ ~~:t,i~~l~,~~ ,~ ,~ ~ - ~a~ ~ ___a_ ~~ ~ __ _. t ~ v~-. ~Y FUTURE DEVELOPMENT Future Development investment in the Lake Simcoe Regional Airport is important to see this investment flourish as an economic generator. Strategic investment is needed in the area of infrastructure, safety and security. A list of infrastructure improvements is detailed below: • Runway extension and resurfacing • Taxiways • Security fencing • Terminal building expansion • Maintenance building upgrade • Aprons • Fire Suppression • Storm water management • infrastructure and capital works w _~ ~~ ,~ V Investment Required The capital investment required to support the airport and potential development as detailed in the figure above amounts to $14,226,000. Details of the costing are as follows: Capital Project Gast Runway Extension to 1,800m {5,905 ft} $2,000,000.00 Partial Parallel Taxiway {half runway length) $2,175,000.00 North East Code C Taxiway {350m) $420,000.00 Airport Security Fencing $340,000.00 SW Commercial Area merge Taxiway and Aprons $500,OOOA0 Fire Suppression - STORAGEtPUMPS $750,000.00 Fire Suppression -INITIAL MAINS - 1,360m $340,000.00 NE Commercial Area - SWM Pand Phase 1 $260,000.00 Develop Lots SW Commercial Area Phase 2 $426,000.00 Sanitary and Water Upgrades - SW Commercial Area $296,000,00 Minor Capital Projects $975,000.00 Maintenance Garage Retrofd $20,OOOA0 Tree Removal $170,000.00 Increase Fuel Storage Capacity $10,000.00 Tug and Service Vehicles $55,000.00 Terminal Building Parking Lot Expansion $50,000.00 Back Up Generator $55,000.00 Water and Sanitary Upgrades @ $20Ktysar $100,000.00 Runway Overlay - 40 mm $400,000.00 North East Code C Taxiway (245 m} $294,000.00 NE Commercial Area - SWM Pand Phase 2 $280,000.00 NE Commercial Fire Mains {245 m} $61,250.00 Develop Lots SW Commeraal Area Phase 2 $892,004.00 Sanitary and Water Upgrades - SW Commercial Area $528,000.00 Air Terminal Building Expansion $540,OOOA0 x Water and Sanitary Upgrades @ $30Kfyear $150,000.00 North East Code G Taxiway (170m} $204,000.00 (240m} $288,000.00 (150m} $180,OOOA0 Develop Lots SW Commercial Area Phase 2 $448,000.00 NE Commercial Area - SWM Pond Phase 3 $580,000.00 NE Commercial Fire Mains (170m} $42,ra00,00 {240m} $60,000.00 (154m} $37,500.00 SW Commercial Fire Mains {155m} $28,750.00 Water and Sanitary Upgrades @ $35K pa $350,000.00 Total $14,226,000.00 YI Municipal Benefits The benefits of investing in the LSRA are numerous and range from increased economic activity to ' increased assessmentljobs to meeting the Economic Development objectives of {1) attracting new businesses; {2) supporting existing businesses; and {3) encouraging entrepreneurship. These investments in the LSRA will not only drive growth in the non-residential assessment base of Oro- . Medonte, but also Barrie and Orillia through the development of a regional aerospace industry. An expanded LSRA wiA support the attraction of new businesses to both the airport as well as the neighbouring municipalities (through the growth of a regional aerospace centre of excellence). The attraction of the potential companies to the LSRA will lead to an increased requirement for industrial services and commercial amenities that would likely be sourced locally. This would result in additional business for industrial suppliers, tradespersons, etc. In addition to this, the development of an airport business park will lead to increased demand for commercial services such as restaurants, retail stores, etc. The retention of existing businesses will be supported by an expanded LSRA through both the increased economic activity and the impact of the improved infrastructure on the functionality of the airport. For example, a longer runway and mare services would enable the LSRA to be able to service a wider variety of aircraft, and hence, potentially divert some traffic from other nearby airports as well as lead to increased usage by local business {e.g. Honda, Casino Rama, etc). This growth may one day lead to scheduled passenger services, tour operators, etc. and a direct impact on the tourism industry far the area. An expanded LSRA will also support entrepreneurship through both the expansion of available space and opportunities. For example, with additional space available for lease, entrepreneurs in the aerospace ar related industries may choose to locate at the LSRA as the extra space may enable them to grow their businesses. In addition to this, there wiH be increased opportunities for local entrepreneurs to meet the needs of companies relocating to the LSRA. An example of this could be a requirement from an airplane customizing operation for a specific part which is not produced locally. A person with manufacturing expertise could start an operation that meets this need. This spin-off effect would increase both the business activity and employment in the area and has already been experienced in the area as seen in the number of businesses supported by Honda Canada's manufacturing facility in Alliston. Although at first glance it would seem that only Oro-Medonte would realize a direct impact on their tax base due to activity at the LSRA, there could potentially be an impact on the tax base of the other two municipalities as well, and indeed the surrounding Simcoe County . VII In Summary The Lake Simcoe Regional Airport is an essential component in the growth and development scenario for Oro-Medonte, Orillia and Barrie, and in fact ail of Simcoe County. The airport has been following deliberate and well thought out business strategy of growth tied to economic responsibility to the supporting communities. However, timing and circumstance is now dictating that a substantial infrastructure investment be made at this time to support sound business assumptions being made about the future of the surrounding area. The building Canada fund is an ideal vehicle to be used to further the goals set for the development of this airport, and the benefits extend beyond the local area to even the Greater Toronto area as we offer viable alternatives to essential transportation issues. These issues will become more and more pressing as we move forward, and it is of the upmost priority that the LSRA, through this type of infrastructure growth, be ready to meet the challenges. The LSRA, with the support of the three community owners, local M!''s, and MHA's, are requesting they be included under the Building Canada initiative, and that the funds be made available to look after such diverse needs as runway extension, waterworks installation, terminal building expansion etc. all of which will contribute to completing on a sound business plan that benefits all the parties involved, and ensures that a crucial piece if Ontario infrastructure is realized. Table 6 outlines the general information and assumptions that will be used in this analysis. Table 6 Known Variables Investment Re wired $14,283,500 Projected job creation (Known 375 to 625 jabs ro'ects Projected job creation (Based on 334 jobs land use -Short Term* Projected job creation (Based on 642 jobs land use -Medium Term* Projected jab creation (Based on 1,125 jobs land use -Lon Term* Initial 'ob creation 150 Average Annual Salary - $48,478.30 Aeros ace Indust ** Assume 1 job per 70 sq.m. ** Source: www.caw.calwhawearelGAWcanstitutionlconventionpapers/pdfslAER aSPAGE_torcon.pdf Notes : Construction costs are based on $700 per sq.m. ($65 per s.f.) Table 6B Companies Considering Investing at LSRA Company Project # of Initial # of Future Total Total Total Name Description Employees Employees Employment Square Square Foots a Metres Targeted Final 175 175 350 220,000 20,438 Opportunity manufacturing A and assembly of 400+ sport/hobby/mid- size lanes er ear. Targeted Logistics Centre 50* 25" 75" 150,000 13,935 Opportunity - - B 300,000 27,870 TOTAL 375 250 625 470,000 43,663- - 62,273 670,000 Estimated, actual would likely be significantly higher based on size of project Table 6C Investment Scenarios Initial Scenario Scenario 1 - Scenario 2 - Scenario 3 - Short Term Medium Term Long Term Qirect Jobs 150 334 642 1,125 Indirect Jobs 150 334 642 1,125 Total Em to ment 300 668 1,284 2,250 Direct a roll $7,271,745 $16,191,752 $31,123,068 $54,538,087 Total a roll $14,543,490 $32,383,504 $62,246,136 $111,500,088 Retail Impact $5,459,700 $12,156,932 $23,367,516 $40,947,750 Ontario Retail Impact (Barrie/OrilliatOro- $4,094,775 $9,117,699 $17,525,637 $30,710,812 Medonte 10 Yr Retail $40,947,750 $91,176,990 $175,256,370 $307,108,120 Im act* Projected Sq.m. 9,290 (100,000 23,350 (251,246 21,550 (231,970 33,825 (364,101 Built s.f. s.f. s.f. s.f. s.f. Projected Construction $6,500,000 $16,330,990 $15,078,050 $23,666,565 Investment Total Annual $14,543,490 $32,383,504 $62,246,136 $111,500,088 Pa roll Im act - TOVIltNSHIP C}F 4R0-MEDt?NTE - REPORT Report No. TR 2008-09 To: Committee of the Whole Prepared By: Bonnie McPhee Meeting Date: April 16, 2008 Subject: Motion # Statement of Accounts - Roll #: March 2008 R.M.S. File #: RECOMENDATION{S): Requires Action Far Information Only It is recommended that: 1. That Report No. TR 2008-09 is received. 2. The accounts for the month of March 2008 totalling $5,482,235.27 are received. BACKGROUND: Following is the statement of accounts for the month of March. Batch No. Date Amount Cheaue Reaisters: AC00479 AC00480 AC00481 AQ00375 AC00482 Payroll: PR00282 PR00284 PR00287 March 05, 2008 March 12, 2008 March 19, 2008 March 20, 2008 March 26, 2008 March 01, 2008 March 15, 2008 March 29, 2008 205,284.74 577,839.89 4,232,381.39 1,381.22 137,367.15 111,618.47 106,342.28 103,326.17 $ 5,154,254.39 321,286.92 TREASURY April 16, 2008 Report No. 2008-09 Page 1 of 2 Credit Card Reaisters: AE0091 March 20, 2008 244.65 "" AE0092 March 20, 2008 325.50 AE0093 March 20, 2008 462.54 AE0094 March 20, 2008 1,134.77 AE0095 March 20, 2008 734.16 AE0096 March 20, 2008 242.43 AE0097 March 20, 2008 3,549.91 6,693.96 Total $ 5,482,235.27 ATTACHMENTS: Cheque registers. CONCLUSION: That the accounts for the month of March are received. RespecfiFully submitted: Bonnie McPhee Accounting Glerk C.A.O. Comments: C.A.O. Approval: Date: ~~ TREASURY April 16, 2008 Report No. 2008-09 Page 2 of 2 :111 r. T4WNSHlP 4F QRQ-MED4NTE REPORT Report No. To: COMMITTEE OF THE Prepared By: EES2008-22 WHOLE Keith Mathieson Meeting Date: Subject: Motion # April 16, 2008 Point-to-Point Roll #: Communications Ltd. -Extend R.M.S. File #: Lease Agreement -Horseshoe L04-10357 Valle Water Tower RECOMMENDATION(S): Requires Action For Information Only It is recommended that: 1. THAT Report #EES2008-22 be received and adopted. 2. THAT the Township of Oro-Medonte extends the existing Lease Agreement with Point-to-Point Communications for an additional seven (7} years. 3. THAT the rent applicable to this lease is set at the amount of $1,800.00 per annum, or $150.00 per month, plus applicable taxes. 4. THAT the Clerk prepares a By-law for Council's consideration. 5. AND THAT Paint-to-Point Communications be notified of Council's decision. BACKGROUND: In May, 2003, the Township of Oro-Medonte entered into a five (5) year Lease Agreement with Paint-to-Point Communications Ltd. allowing Point-to-Point to install communications equipment on the existing Horseshoe Valley Zone II water tower. This Agreement has the option for a further seven (7) years at a rate to be negotiated. ANALYSIS: With the original five (5) year Lease Agreement expiring in May, 2008, Mr. Sam Lawry of Paint-to-Point Communications is now requesting the Lease Agreement be extended for a further seven (7) years. The communication equipment located on the Horseshoe Valley water tower has had no negative affects to the Township. Engineering and Environmental Services April 16, 2008 Report No. EES2008-22 Page 1 of 2 FINANCIAL: At the present time, Point-to-Point Communications pays the Township $1,500.00 per year, which will be increased to $1,800.00 per year for the installation of their communications equipment on the water tower. This money is shown as an income to the municipal water systems. POLICIES/LEGISLATION: 'I CONSULTATIONS: Mr. Sam Lowry, Point-to-Paint Communications Ltd. ATTACHMENTS: Point-to-Point Lease Agreement, dated May 7, 2003 Correspondence from Mr. Sam Lowry, dated December 3, 2007 Report #EES2003-29 CONCLUSION: That the Township of Oro-Medonte extends the Lease Agreement with Point-to-Point Communications Ltd. for seven (7) years at a rate of $150.00 per month, or $1,800.00 per year, plus applicable taxes. Resp , ullj~ submitted: x Keitka~M 'son Director of Engineering and Environmental Services -- SMT Approval 1 Comments: C.A.O. Approval /Comments: Engineering and Environmental Services April 16, 2008 Report No. EES2008-22 Page 2 of 2 • ' ~ ii~im i it • ~ ~ COMMUNICATIONS Schedule "1" to By-law No. 2003-040 Page 1 of 3 LEASE AGREEMENT Between ORO-Medonte (Township of) (Owner) and Point to Point Communications Ltd (Lessee) 38 Hooper Road, Barrie, Ontario WHEREAS the lessee has applied to the Township of Oro-Medonte to enter into an agreement to install communications equipment on the existing Horseshoe Valley Zone II water tower " AND WHEREAS the said technical information is accurate to the best of our ability as per Schedule "A" AND WHEREAS the Lessee agrees to the terms and conditions set in this lease agreement and will abide by them, as per Schedule "B" The rent applicable to this lease is set at the amount of 1500.00 per annum or 125.00 per month plus applicable taxes. The rent is due on the first day of each month and payment sent to the ORO-Medonte (Township of) at Box 100 Oro Station, Ontario LOL 2X0. A 2% interest charge will be incurred after 30 days. First and last months payments will be made at the point of lease commencing and annual payments can also be made is lesser so desires. 38 Hooper Road, Barrie, Ontario L4N 8Z9 Tel: (705) 721-9877 • Fax: (705) 721-1021 • 1-800-721-9877 Bracebridge Office: (705) 645-9216 • 1-800-290-0599 • Fax: (705} 645-1754 Concord Office: (800) 461-5614 ~~~~ 3 March 14, 2003 Date The Corpo a it on of the ~~ To shi of Oro-Medonte Dat ~ ei Craig, Ma r Marilyn Pe cook, Cler ~, MarNyn Pwryovok• CiMlt d tlr Corpora~on d ttw Tawrtdp d Oro-MedorAs~ do IfNrb~- c~rllh- udK my hand artd the oorporal~ aMl tl1~t I!M ~regoin~ is ~ true and mnMCt oop~/ d ~~1 ~ l~,W ~d , aGC33 -C~'~1~ which waa duly psMSd in Council au 1~'no, p~ ttio~h , 'J~O d 3 . Dated: ~~ I Mai , Ob Oro Station, Ontario CileAc PAGE®A~~ M MOTOROLA Authorized Two-Way Radio Dealer }, ~v. ~_~ i Schedule "1" to By-law No. 2003-044 Page 2 of 3 SCHEI?ULE `A' Applicant Company Name: Point to Point Communication Ltd. Address: 38 Hooper Road Barrie, Ontario Postal Code: L4N-1 B7 Telephone: (705} 721-9877 Fax: (705} 721-1021 Company Representative: Bryan MacKinnon Type Of Service: (ie: Paging, Personal, ?'runking, Data etc.,J Wireless High Speed Internet Frequency(s): 5.7Ghz Transmitters} Manufacturer: Motorola Model: Canes Receiver(s) Manufacturer: Motorola Model: Canolay Overall Equipment Cabinet Dimensions: Width: 20" Depth: 20" Height: 72" Total AC Power Requirements: {one) 120Vac 15arnp outlet Combined / Multicoupled into Existing Antenna System: Yes ` , No (X) Calculated Effective Ra~fate over: 1.0 Watt l "`~ ~ ° i~L o 3 tip ' ant's ~ a e Print Date ~~ Schedule "1" to By-law No. 2003-040 SCHEDULE `B' Page 3 of 3 • Each installation shall be covered by its own "Industry Canada" license agreement in which shall be specified the applicable technical, operation, and legal conditions. A copy of the license must be posted with the equipment in the shelter. • Lease agreements for the usage of the property shall normally be for a term of 5 years, with the options for a further 7 years at a rate to be negotiated. No sub leasing of tower site by Point to Point Communications Ltd. is permitted without the consent of the property owner. • All installations an the property are subject to approval of both plan and installation. Frequency intermodulation studies may have to be performed at the expense of the lesser before installation. • The lessee shall be responsible for the adjustment and maintenance of all of its equipment, unless other provision is made in a separate agreement. All lessee equipment in the site shall be in proper working order and kept neatly within the leased area as to not cause interference to other property within the site. The owner of the site holds the right to terminate services if interference in not appropriately corrected ar responded to. • Amounts payable under a lease agreement maybe made adjustable for the effects of price inflation and or extra consumption of hydro. • The right of access to the property will be granted to the lessee maintaining equipment within the shelter. Keys to the shelter will be distributed in goad faith that the site is only accessed by the names given in the application, duplication of access by other parties without notifications to the owner will cause immediate termination of the set agreement. Keys will be issued to Bryon MacKinnon & service personnel of Point to Point Communications who will be responsible for the keys & ail actions of other parties on this property to whom the keys are issued to, as third parts or service personnel. • Every expense incurred by Oro-Medonte (Township of) as a result of the installation, maintenance or testing of the licensee's equipment shall be payable by the lessee, together with an administration charge of 15% of the amount payable. • The lessee must hold a minimum of one million dollars in liability insurance along with their own personal equipment insurance. Page 1 of l Mathieson, Keith ~ From: Sam Lowry Sent: Monday, December 03, 20Q7 527 PM To: Mathiesan, Keith C6:' Subject: Site Renewal Hi Keith, Just reviewing our site agreement with Ora Medonte. It shows that we need to notify you of#er the initial three years to renew our agreement. The original agreement shows an initial term plus an option to renew far 7 years, with native. We are therefore writing to confirm that we would like to renew far the additional 7 years. Thanks for your time in this matter. I will vall later to follow up. Sam Lowry Point to Paint Communications 1~ ~~~_~~ ° ~ ~~ ~. ~~~ ~. .,_~ ..~,.. TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE REPORT DEPT. REPORT NO.: TO: COUNCIL PREPARED BY: EES2003-29 Keith Mathieson SUBJECT: DEPARTMENT: COUNCIL: Point-to-Point Engineering and Communications Ltd. - Environmental Services C. OF W.: Request to Enter into Lease ..~ Agreement DATE: MOTION #: April 29, 2003 DATE: t~°'~t ~ ~ ~~'`-`~ R. M. FILE NO.: L14-12633 BACKGROUND: Point-to-Point Communications Ltd. of Barrie has approached the Township to enter into a Lease Agreement to install a communication antenna on the Horseshoe Valley Zone II water tower. This Agreement would consist of a five-year term with options for a further seven (7) years. A copy of the Lease Agreement is attached for Council's perusal. ANALYSIS: The installation of the proposed antenna will allow residents and existing Township buildings in the Horseshoe area access to "high-speed Internet" and provide additional revenue far the water systems. RECOMIIIENDATION(S): 1. THAT this report be received and adopted. 2. THAT the Township of Oro-Medonte enters into a Lease Agreement with Point-to-Point Communications Ltd. to install a communication antenna on the Horseshoe Valley Zone II water tower. 3. he Clerk prepares the appropryate By-law for Council's consideration. R sp ully submitted, _ ~,~_ ~~'\, ~ Keit athieson ~~~1 d ~~ "~- Tt~WNSHIP C?F C)RO-MED(JNTE `~~s ._ ~_ ~ REPC)RT ~~ Report No. To: Committee of Whole Prepared By: BP 2008-01? Steven Farquharson, Junior Planner Meeting Date: Subject: Zoning By-law Motion # April 16, 2008 Amendment for Michael MacVittie Roll #: Range 2, Part of Lot 3, R.M.S. File #: D14 37264 4346-010-007-03110 978 Line 2 South Ron Henderson Range 2, Part of Lat 3 892 Line 2 South Former Townshi of Oro RECOMMENDATION(S): Requires Action X^ For Information Only It is recommended: 1. THAT Report BP 2008-017 be received and adopted; and 2. THAT Zoning By-law Amendment Application 2007-ZBA-07 for Michael MacVittie, Range 2, Part of Lot 3, 978 Line 2 South (Farmer Township of Oro) on Schedule A2 on the Zoning By-law 97-95 (as amended) from AgriculturallRural (A/RU) Zone to Residential One (R1) Zone be approved. 3. THAT Zoning By-law Amendment Application 2007-ZBA-07 for Michael MacVittie on behalf of Ron Henderson, Range 2, Part of Lot 3, 892 Line 2 South (Former Township of Oro) on Schedule A2 on the Zoning By-law 97- 95 (as amended) from AgriculturallRural (AIRU) Zone to Residential One Exception 180 (R1 *180) Zone, which provides relief to lot area be approved. 4. That the Clerk bring forward the appropriate By-law for Council's consideration. BACKGROUND: The purpose of this report is to Consider a proposed Zoning By-law Amendment application submitted by Michael MacVittie, also acting on behalf of Ron Henderson, on October 19, 2007. The rezoning application has been submitted to fulfill a condition of approval for Consent Application 2006-B-24, which was granted by the Committee of Adjustment on June 21, 2007. A statutory public meeting was held on January 23, 2008 to receive comments from members of the public and relevant agencies. The BUILDING AND PLANNING SERVICES Meeting Date April 16, 2008 Report No. BP 2008-017 Page 1 of 5 application was circulated to internal Township Departments and outside agencies, and no concerns were raised. ANALYSIS: As part of the Committee's provisional approval, the applicant must apply for and obtain a rezoning for both properties to maintain the consistency of the zoning fabric in the a rp a FINANCIAL: Not applicable POLICIES/LEGISLATION: Official Plan: ..:,...The subject lands are designated Rural Settlement Area by the Official Plan. Permitted. uses in this designation include low density residential development, small scale commercial and industrial uses, and institutional uses. The subject lands already have been developed for, and function as residential properties containing single detached dwellings, being a permitted use in the Rural Settlement Area designation. As such, the application to rezone the subject lands from A/RU Zone to R1 Zone complies with the objectives of the Township Official Plan. Zoning By-law: The lands to be retained, being 978 Line 2 South, will consist of 0.27 hectares, maintain a frontage of 38 metres, and currently contain a single detached dwelling. The enhanced lot, being 892 Line 2 North, would consist of 0.18 hectares, and maintain 38 metres of frontage. The retained lands would comply with the minimum lot area and frontage provisions of the R1 Zone, where the minimum required lot area is 0.2 hectares, and the minimum lot frontage required is 30 metres; however, the enhanced lot, 892 Line 2 South being increased to 0.18 hectares, would have slightly less than the required 0.2 hectare minimum lot area required for the R1 Zone. It is therefore recommended by staff that a site specific zoning be placed on the enhanced lot to recognize the lot area deficiency. Due to the lot being already developed for residential purposes, it would not further affect setbacks from property lines. It is staff's opinion that the lot would otherwise generally be in keeping with the residential character of the surrounding neighbourhood. CONSULTATIONS: The application has been circulated to all internal gepartments ana outsiae agencies, no concerns have been indicated. BUDDING AND PLANNING SERVICES Meeting Date April 16, 2008 Report No. BP 2008-017 Page 2 of 5 ATTACHMENTS: Attachment #1-Context map of location far application 2007-ZBA-07 Attachment #2- Context map of locatian far application 2007-8-24 CONCLUSION: Consent Application 2006-B-24 was approvea by the vammi~ee oT Hca~usui~~ri~ ~~~ ~u~ic 21, 2007, as part of the Committee's conditional approval, the applicant must apply for and obtain a rezoning far the conveyed lands to maintain the consistency of the zoning fabric in the area. The proposed Zoning By-law Amendment conforms to the general intent of the Official Plan. On this basis, it is recommended that Zoning By-law Amendment Application 2007-ZBA-07 be approved and adopted by Council. Respectfuliy ~u~mitted, r ~~ Reviewed by: Steven Farquharson, B.URPL Junior Planner I Bruce Hoppe, MCIP, RPP Director of Building and Planning Services C.A.O. Comments: Date: ~, ~~ C.A.O. Dept. Head BUILDING AND PLANNING SERVICES Meeting Date April 16, 2008 Report No. BP 2008-017 Page 3 of 5 Attachment #1 I ~~ - ~~ i ~' _ _ ____ I I --- - - ---1----1- --- __--- --~ - y- ~~ ~ ~ --ARBOURWOOD SUBDIVISION I I _ --- ~ ~ _ ---- - 892 LINE 2 SOUTH Proposed rezoning from A/RU Zone to R1*180 Zone 978 LINE 2 SOUTH Proposed rezoning from A/RU Zone to R1 Zone 1 _. - ~Q~S~ -) ~ -- --- ---- ~'' __ ED,O _l __ _~ - _ __-- _-- 1 -' ANTY \~: , : ,-- L ~ BAY --- - ~~ ~ ~ ~ . -- / __ _ MAR f E ~ -- ~,,~ , ~r ,~ ~,, ~~~, _- ~ - ~~~ _- 1 BUILDING AND PLANNING SERVICES Report No. BP 2008-017 Meeting Date April 16, 2008 Page 4 of 5 Attachment #2 SURVEYC?R'S REAL PROPER REPORT SuRV>'~RS cERn~rcATE PART 1- P]_AN OF SURVEY I cERT>FY THAT: OF PART OF ~QT 3 1• THIS SURVEY AND PLAN ARE CORRECT AND iN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SURVEYS ACT, THE SURVEYORS AC7 AND THE /"/~ REGULATIONS MADE UNDER THEM. RANGE f+. 2. THE 511RVEY WAS COMPLETED DN AUIXlSt 22. 2003. /~ ~ f GEOGRAPHIC T(7WNSH(P OE C7R0 DATE: SEPTEMBER 4, 2003 TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE PETER T. RAN(E5. B.~.,pL~ ONTARtO LAND SURVEYOR COUNTY OF SIMCOE SCALE 1:750 ~, L~ a Ta RAIKES SURVEYING LTD. d t;; I ..M4 ~" Vii I ' 1 `e- ._, ~~- ~f> • J /'l "-' ~ ; ~_ L1 / r r ~, f ~ t~ 3 p ^ Q M r~ .. 2 1 L i. j r~'~" L-L/ ! ~ Vr t ti E~J ~~ 4j I ~J 4~j r~.. PART 1 i~ --' ~ ': i_ ~/ t ~_ II I ~~ ~ ~~~ [4 ~,~I '~-j'~ IB{1035} ' } S..Z4 ~~ iBL103h) ~~." MI' ~ 3 3D O ~~ a `~ ,1,,, l/ I ~i x Y~_ c~ ~~ n ~ 1 ~~ . ._. ... ..... " ..i .... -~-~ 27.49 V '~ SIB(i255) ( ~ li r_. 9i ~ i;} C`, C> ` t'} s. FENCE ON' LINE - iB(t035} L' Lf; lY) 3 ~ ^s. "` , o ~ 4 ~ ~ tV Z ~ t \i N ~ \i 21 E. - rj7,(j$ ROW OF CEDARS D.2 N. C~ ~c'~~C7'lee. IB(i 390) `". N58'S8 34"E sB<ta4t) ~~ C.~, tOx~: E31kr~ '~Gj `~ _ ~-l/ / k~ (( ~~~d j> ~ -tie°j Qiu v~ C,) ~ •J~? I I I c~t~ ~ (Tltn a -.1~~ z NOTES Olt:io AS50()IATON OF ONTARIO THE ONER STOREYEBRICK BUILDING LIES 1k77HiN E PARCEL 7F1E BOUNDARY 4F THE PARCEL. NOTE THE LOCATION OF THE HYDRO LINE. COMPLIANCE WITH MUWCIPAL ZONING BY-LAWS NOT CERTtETEO BY THIS REPORT. FENCES C~PLY REASONABLY Wa1H THE LIMITS SURVEYED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED: N07E AND THEOPUNOERSIGNED RCECEPTS NORRESPIX~ISIBIOTYB~R FOR U'5E 8Y OTHERS. Alf7RfC DISTANCES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE IN METRES AND CAN BE CONVERTED TO FEEt 8Y DiNDMC BY 0.304& DRAWN HY: J.E. -.-- CHIS'D HY: R.J.H. PROJECT 8894 BEARINGS ARE ASTftONOMiC AND ARE REFERRED TO (,AND SURVEYORS THE WESTERLY LIMIT ~ THE RORD ALLOWANCE BETWEEN P1,µ $[JgApyyp{ F'aRAI CONCESSION 3 AND RANGE 2, SHOWN AS ~ 468235 N3t91'30'W tN! REGISTERED PLAN SiM-a99. ^ DENOTES SURVEY MONUMENT POUND SIB STANDARD IRON OAR Ig N20N 6AR 1035 R. WELSMAN, D.L.S. 1255 RAIKES SURVEYING LTD. 1380 P, KITCHEN, O.L.S. TNI$ PLAN IS NOT YAt1O i841 RAIKES SURVEYING LTD. tJrJ~$$ IT IS AN EMBOSSED ORIGINAL DOPY SUR~ YOR ISSU O H ry ordonce Ragulatiorrc1026, Section 29(3}. RAIKES' SURV.E~'ING LTD. Ontario Land Survepora ~ Botiudary Conaultanta 25 Herozy Street, P.O.Boz 1180. Harrie Ontario, L4M 5Fw^ Telephone {7O5) 728-8883 Fas (7O8) 728-889H E-Mail Address surveys6®raikeasurveyingcam Copies Available At wwx.landsurveyrecords.com 1 j,- BUILDING AND PLANNING SERVICES Meeting Date April 16, 2008 Report No. BP 2008-017 Page 5 of 5 TQWNSNIP t?F 4RQ-MEDONTE _f .,.":. - REPORT ~~ s ~_~ Report No. Bp ~OOg_OZ0 To: Committee of the Whole Prepared By: Adam Kozlowski, Planner Meeting Date: 2008 il 16 A Subject: Site Plan Agreement and removal of Hold Motion # , pr & Blanche 2008-SPA-01 (Gar Roll #: y Johnston) R.M.S. File #: D11 37657 4346-010-009-48800 LOT 7, PLAN 798 ORO; PART OF LOT $, PLAN 798 ORO AS IN R0897948; EXCEPT T!W THEREIN; S/T EXECUTION 95- 03170, IF ENFt3RCEAB~E; ORO-MEDONTE Being all of PIN 58559-0159 (LTA 13 O'Connell Lane RECOMMENDATION(S): Requires Action~X For Information Only It is recommended: 1. THAT Report No. BP 2048-020 be received and adopted. 2. THAT the Township of Oro-Medonte enters into a Site Plan Agreement with Gary & Blanche Johnston to construct a detached accessory garage at 13 O'Connell Lane. 3. THAT the Clerk prepares a By-law for Council's consideration to enter into a Site Plan Agreement with Gary & Blanche Johnston. 4. THAT the Clerk prepare a By-law for Council's consideration to remove the Holding Symbol from lands described as 13 O'Connell Lane, LOT 7, PLAN 798 ORO; PART OF LOT $, PLAN 798 ORO AS IN R0897948; EXCEPT T/W THEREIN; S!T EXECUTION 95-43174, IF ENFORCEABLE; ORO-MEDONTE Being all of PIN 58559-0159 (LT). 5. AND THAT the owners be notified of Committee's decision. BACKGROUND: The owner is proposing to construct a new detached accessory garage. Application far building permit has been applied for respecting the structure. As O'Connell Lane is an un-assumed road and the property is zoned "RLS (H)", the owner must enter into a Site Plan Agreement prior to the removal of the Holding Symbol and issuance of a Building Permit. PLANNING DEPARTMENT Meeting Date April 16, 2008 Report No. BP 2008-020 Page 1 of 5 ANALYSIS: The subject lands are Zoned Residential Limited Service (Hold} (R~.S (H}} Zone; the Hold applies to certain lands within the municipality that do not front on a municipally- assumed road. Permitted uses in the RLS (H) Zane include single detached dwellings, accessory buildings, and boathouses. As such, the applicant's proposal to construct a new detached accessory garage would constitute a permitted use. That applicant was required to apply far a Minor Variance (application 2447-A-27} from the Committee of Adjustment for the placement of the proposed garage; specifically, a reduction far the front yard setback from the required 7.5 metres to 6.73 metres and for a reduction for the interior side yard setback from the required 2 metres to 1 metre, was granted by the Committee on October 18, 2047. (See Schedule 2 - Committee of Adjustment Decision} Aside from the front yard setback, the proposed garage would otherwise comply with the required height and floor area provisions for accessory structures, as required under Section 5 of Zoning By-law 97-95. FINANCIAL: N/A. POLICIES/LEGISLATION: Township of Oro-Medonte Official Plan Township of Oro-Medonte Zoning By-law 97-95 The Planning Act, Section 36 CONSULTATIONS: A Site Plan Control Technical Committee Meeting was held on April 3, 2448. No concerns were raised by Township staff at this meeting. ATTACHMENTS: Schedule 1: Location Map Schedule 2: Committee of Adjustment Decision Schedule 3: Site Plan Agreement PLANNING DEPARTMENT Meeting Date April 16, 2008 Report No. BP 2008-020 Page 2 of 5 1 CONCLUSION: The application to construct a new detached garage constitutes a permitted use, and notwithstanding the variance for reduced front yard setback, the structure would otherwise comply with all requirements of the RLS (H) Zone. It is recommended that Site Plan Application 2008-SPA-01 be approved. Respectfully submitted: Adam Ko~awski Planner Department Head Comments: Dept. Head Approval: _Y. ;._ ~ Date: C.A.O. Comments: C.A.O. Approval: Date: PLANNING DEPARTMENT Meeting Date Apri~ ~ti, zuurs Report No. BP 2008-020 Page 3 of 5 SCHEDULE 1: ~QCATION MAP 2008-SPA-01 (JQHNST©N} PANNING DEPARTMENT Meeting Date April ~f;, zoos Report No. BP 2008-020 Page 4 of 5 SCHEDULE 2: COMMITTEE QF ADJUSTMENT DECISIQN 2QQ8-SPA-01 (JQHNSTON) PAGIu # 2 .4PFLICATIC}N 247-A-27 CQ;14iVtTTTEE OF AD3US1'ME1VT DECISION Motion 14a. Cr107~0I8-5 BE IT REBOLti'ED that: Moved by Carry Potter, seconded by Bruce Chappell "Committee approve Minor b'ariance 2007-A-27, being to grant a reduction for the interior side yard setback from 2 metres to l metre, and to reduce the front yard setback from 7.S metres to 6.73 metros for the construction of a detached accessory building having a floor area of 61.3 square metres, subject to the following conditions. I . That an Ontario Land Surveyor provide verification to the Township of compliance with the Committee's decision by 1) pinning the footing and 2) verifying in writing prior to pouring of the foundation by way of surveylre=al property report so that:: a} the detached garage be located no closer than 6.73 metres from the front lot line b) the detached garage be no closer than 1 metre to the east interiar side lot line 2. That the applicant enter into a Site Plan Agreement with the Township, including removal of the Holding Provision, 3. That the applicant receive any necessary permits andlor approvals from the Lake Simcae Region Conservation Authority, if required; 4. That the appropriate building permit be obtained from the Tow-nship's Chief Building Official only after the Connmittee's decision becomes final and binding, as provided for within the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, a.P. 13. S. That the applicant removes the existing shed located at the front of the subject property within one year of the date of this decision. Carried", Additional information regarding this Application is available for public inspection at the Township of Oro-Medonte Administration Centre; l48 Line 7 South in Oro Station, Ontario, Monday to Friday, between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. PLANNING DEPARTMENT Meeting Date April 16, 2008 Report No. BP 2008-020 Page 5 of 5 APPENDIX "A" SITE PLAN AGREEMENT - between - GARY DAVID JOHNSTON BLANCHE PATRICIA JOHNSTON (As joint tenants) -and- THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE DESCRIPTION OF LAND LOT 7, PLAN 798 ORO; PART OF LOT 8, PLAN 798 ORO AS IN RO$97948; EXCEPT T/W THEREIN; S/T EXECUTION 95-03170, IF ENFORCEABLE; ORO-MEDONTE Being all of PIN 58559-0159 (LT) 13 O'Connell Lane Roll # 4346-010-009-48800 TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE COUNTY OF SIMCOE APRI<_, 2008 By-Law No. 2008- THE T4WNSIi1P OF 4Rt?-MEDQNTE SITE PLAN AGREEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1 Covenants by the Qwners Section 2 Covenants by the Township Section 3 Development Restrictions Section 4 Development Changes Section 5 Security Section 6 Compliance Section 7 Co-operation Section 8 Binding Effect Section 9 Severability of Clauses Section 10 Save Harmless SCHEDULES Schedule "A" legal Description of Lands Schedule `B" Site Plan Schedule "C" Deeds and Easements to be Conveyed Schedule "D" Itemized Estimate of Cost of Construction SITE PLAN CONTROL AGREEMENT This Agreement made, in quadruplicate, this day of 2008, in accordance with Section 41 of the Planning Act. BETWEEN: GARY DAVID JOHNSTON GLANCE PATRICIA JOHNSTON (As joint tenants} Hereinafter called the "Owners" PARTY OF THE FIRST PART -and- THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE Hereinafter called the "Township" PARTY OF THE SECOND PART WHEREAS the Owners have applied to the Township of Oro-Medante to permit the construction of a 61.3 square metre detached garage on lands described in Schedule "A", attached hereto; AND WHEREAS the Township has enacted a By-law to provide for the designation of the lands as a "Site Plan Control Area"; AND WHEREAS the Owner intends to develop the lands in accordance with the Site Plan attached hereto as Schedule "B"; NOW THEREFORE This Agreement Witnesseth THAT in consideration of the mutual covenants hereinafter contained, the parties hereto hereby covenant and agree as follows: 1. COVENANTS BY THE OWNERS The Owners covenant and agree as foAaws: a) The Owners awn the subject lands described in Schedule "A", attached hereto, and have provided the Tawnship with a Registered Deed containing the legal description of the subject lands. b) This Agreement may be registered against title to these subject lands and shall take priority aver any subsequent registrations against the title to the subject lands. c) Na work shall be performed on the lands, nor any use made of the subject lands with respect to the proposed development, except in conformity with all the provisions of this Agreement. d) The Owners shall, prior to the execution of this Agreement, obtain all necessary permits and approvals from the Township and from all Ministries and Agencies, including, but not Limited to, the County of Simcae. e) The Owners shall, prior to the execution of this Agreement, pay all municipal taxes and charges related to obtaining the approval of these lands for the intended use. f) The Owners shall pay a refundable deposit for such reasonable costs as may be involved to the Township in having its solicitor, engineer, planner and staff, perform any work in connection with this Agreement, including the preparation, drafting, execution, and registration of this Agreement. The Owners acknowledge and agree that the Owners shall be responsible for the cost of performance of all the Owner's obligations hereunder, unless the context otherwise requires. Every provision of this Agreement, by which the Owners are obligated in any way, shall be deemed to include the words "at the expense of the Owners", unless specifically stated otherwise. The refundable deposit for expenses and actual cast shall be $N/A. The Owners shall replenish the refundable deposit, to its full amount, when the expenses and actual casts are submitted by the Township. g) The Owners shall have delivered to the Tawnship, all TransferslDeeds, Discharges and Easements, or other documents required by Schedule "C", as well as certification from the Owners solicitor that the TransferlDeeds and Easements shall provide the Township with good title, free and clear from all encumbrances. h) The Owners agree that prior to issuance of a Building Permit, a Sewage System Permit approval must be received by the Township/Ministry of the Environment. The Owners acknowledge that the lot does not front on an improved public road, that the Township does not or is not required to maintain or snowplow the said road, that the Township will not take over or assume the private road as a Township public road or street unless it has been built according to the Township standards, then in force, and that the Township is not liable far any injuries, lasses or damages as a consequence of the Tawnship issuing a Building Permit. 2. COVENANTS BY THE TOWNSHIP The Township covenants and agrees as follows: a) That the Township has enacted a By-law to permit the construction of a 61.3 square metre detached accessory garage described on the Site Plan. b) That the Township agrees that subject to compliance by the Owners with all relevant Municipal By-laws and Provincial Statutes and Regulations, the Owners may proceed to develop the subject lands, as indicated on the Site Plan attached hereto as Schedule "B", subject to the development restrictions contained herein. 3. DEVELOPMENT RESTRICTIONS The Parties hereto acknowledge and agree that any use of the subject lands by the Owners shall be on and subject to the following terms and conditions: a) Site Plan The use and development of the subject lands shall be in accordance with and as set out on the Site Plan, attached hereto as Schedule "B". b) t_i htin All lighting systems installed outside, such as floodlights, shah be directed away from any adjacent residential use andfor roadway, not to cause interference in any way. c} Parking Areas and Driveways All parking areas and driveways shall be constructed in conformity with Sections 5.19 and 5.20 of By-law No. 97-95, as amended, and the Ontario Building Cade Regulation #419186, and such parking areas, loading, and access areas shall be kept free and clear of snow and ice and kept adequately drained. All entrances shall be constructed, as in Schedule "B" attached. The Owners agrees to obtain all necessary approvals from the Ministry of Transpartatian, County of Simcoe and Township of Ora-Medante. d) Outside Storage No outside storage shall be permitted between any buildings on the premises and any street. Any other outside storage shall be contained in the fenced compound, as identified on Schedule `°B". e) Garbage Storage The Owners agree to provide suitable storage areas for garbage and waste, as shown on the Site Plan, and to install and maintain litter containers in and around development an the lands. All metal scrap and associated refuse contained in the fenced compound shall be removed on a weekly basis. f) Garbage Collection The Owners acknowledges and agrees that any Industrial, Commercial and Institutional (I. C. & I} and multi-unit locations (six {6) units and over} will not receive curb side waste collection services from the County of Simcoe. Each L C. & I location and multi-unit residential location will be responsible for their own garbage and recycling disposal. g) t_andscaoing The Owners shall complete all landscaping and landscaped areas shown an the Site Pian, attached as Schedule "B", as soon as weather permits, and all grading and sodding required, according to any Engineering drawings submitted, shall be done on all lawn areas. h) Erosion and Siltation Control The Owners must take all necessary precautions to prevent erosion and sedimentation of ditches and culverts, slopes, etc., within the Site Plan, and downstream prior to and during construction. The Owners agree to maintain all erosion and siltation control devices in good repair until vegetative cover has been successfully established. 4. DEVELOPMENT CHANGES The parties acknowledge and agree that there shall be no changes to this Agreement or the Schedules attached hereto, unless and until such changes have been approved by all parties. It is the intention of the parties that material amendments to this Agreement be properly recorded. Such amendments may take the form of a registered Amending Agreement, an unregistered Agreement, exchange of correspondence, Memorandum of Confirmation, ar notations on Engineering drawings. The nature of such record of amendment shall depend on circumstances. 5. SECURITY Prior to signing the Agreement, the Owners will deposit, with the Treasurer of the Township, to cover the faithful performance of the obligations of the Owners arising under this Agreement, including but not limited to the construction of the works and services identified in Schedule "Q" to this Agreement {the "said Work"}, the following securities: a} Cash in the amount of one hundred percent {100°!°} of the estimated cost of the said work, as approved by the Township Engineer and Township Council, or: b) An irrevocable Letter of Credit from a chartered bank, issued in accordance with the requirements of Schedule "E", with an automatic renewal clause in the amount of one hundred percent {100°!°} of the estimated costs of the said works, and as approved by the Township Engineer. The Letter of Credit shall be for a minimum guaranteed period of one {1}year, or such time as the Township decides, and shall be renewed automatically, as necessary, thirty {30} days prior to expiration. c) The Township reserves the right to accept or reject any of these alternative methods of providing securities. Prior to depositing the securities, the Owners Engineer shat! submit an estimate of the cost of the works to the Township Engineer far approval. When the cost estimate has been approved, it will be set out in Schedule "D" of this Agreement and will become the basis far the limits of the securities. d) Any Letter of Credit or security filed with the Township is based upon the estimated cost of completing the various matters prescribed by this Agreement. However, all Letters of Credit and security received by the Township may be used as security for any item or any other matter which, under the terms of this Agreement, is the responsibility of the Owners, including without limiting the generality of the foregoing, payment of engineering, legal, planning or other costs incurred by the Township, which are the responsibility of the Owners, under the terms of this Agreement. e) Upon written notification by the Owners agent, certifying that all required works for which the Letter of Credit was submitted have been completed in accordance with the plans submitted and upon confirmation by the Township or its agent that the Owners obligations under this Agreement have been completed, the Township will return said Letter of Credit. f) If in the event of default of the Owners under any of the provisions of this Agreement, it becomes necessary for the Township to realize on its security or deposits, then the Township shall give, by registered mail, twenty-one (21 }day's notice, its intent to draw down an the security or deposit. 6. GOMP~IQNGE Any action taken by the Township or on its behalf, pursuant to this Agreement, shall be in addition to and without prejudice to any security or other guarantee given on behalf of the Owners for the performance of its covenants and agreements herein, and upon default on the part of the Owners hereunder, the Township shall, in addition to any other remedy available to it, be at liberty to utilize the provisions of Section 427 of the Municipa/Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c. 25, as amended. 7. GO-OPERATION The Owners consent to the registration of this Agreement by the Township, upon the title of the subject lands, at the expense of the Owners and agree to execute such further and other documents, consents or applications, as required, for the purpose of securing registration and giving effect to the provisions of this Agreement. ~~. 8. BINDING EFFECT This Agreement, and everything contained herein, shall be binding upon the successors and assigns of the parties hereto, and upon the lands described in Schedule "A", attached hereto, such Schedule being a legal description of the lands, and it is further agreed that this Agreement shall be prepared, approved and registered on title. 9. SEVERABILITY OF CLAUSES Should any section, subsection, clause, paragraph, or provision of this Agreement be declared by a Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the Agreement as a whole or any part thereof, other than the provision so declared to be invalid. 10. SAVE HARMLESS The C7wners, on behalf of itself, its successors and assigns, agree to indemnify and save harmless, the Township from and against any and all claims, suits, actions and demands whatsoever, which may arise either directly or indirectly by reason of any work or service performed by the Township, its servants or sub-contractors in order to complete the work or services required to be completed under this Agreement, provided the subject matter of such action, suits, claims or demands was not caused intentionally or through gross negligence on the part of the Township, its servants or agents or sub-contractors. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereunto have affixed their respective seals under the hands of their proper officers duly authorized in that behalf. . ~- SIGNED, SEALED AND DELIVERED ) - -. ~~` } O .Gary David Johnston ) } )Owner: Blanche Patricia Johnston } } The Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte } per: } H.S. Hughes, Mayor } J. Douglas Irwin, Clerk '" SCHEDULE °`A" NOTE: It is understood and agreed that this Schedule forms part of the Site Plan Agreement between the Township of ©ro-Medonte and Gary David Johnston and Blanche Patricia Johnston. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF LANDS LOT 7, PLAN 798 ORO; PART OF LOT 8, PLAN 798 ORO AS IN RO897948; EXCEPT TNV THEREIN; S1T EXECUTION 95-03170, IF ENFORCEABLE; ORO-MEDONTE Being all of PIN 58559-0159 (LT) 13 O'Connell Lane Roll # 4346-010-009-48800 SCHEDULE "B" NOTE: It is understood and agreed that this Schedule forms part of the Site Plan Agreement between the Township of Oro-Medonte and Gary David Johnston and Blanche Patricia Johnston. 51TE PLAN Site Plan drawing "Plan of Survey Showing dots 7, 8, 9, Reg'd Plan No 798" as modified by the Owners to depict the location of the 61.3 square metre garage, undated, is not in a registerable form and is available from the Township of Ora-Medonte. SCME©U~E"C" NOTE: It is understood and agreed that this Schedule forms part of the Site Plan Agreement between the Township of Oro-Medonte and Gary David Johnston and Blanche Patricia Johnston. DEEDS AND EASEMENTS TO BE CONVEYED All title documents shall be properly drawn and executed by the parties, with the appropriate Lot or Block Number inserted in the description of the document, and the registered Plan Number shall be left bunk, to be inserted by the solicitors for the parties after the Plan is registered and a Plan Number assigned. The consideration for all conveyances shall be the sum of Two Duffers ($2.RQ) and the cost of preparation, execution and registration thereof, shad be borne by the Owners. All documents to be registered shall be prior approved by the solicitor for the Township. The following land and easement shall be conveyed: 1.0 LANDS TO BE CONVEYED TO THE TOWNSHIP N/A 2.0 DRAINAGE EASEMENTS TO BE CONVEYED TO THE TOWNSHIP N/A ~o ~~b-lb SCHEDULE "D" NOTE: It is understood and agreed that this Schedule forms part of the Site Plan Agreement between the Township of Oro-Medonte and Gary David Johnston and Blanche Patricia Johnston. ITEMIZED ESTIMATE OF COST OF CONSTRUCTION ITEMIZE CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE AMOUNT N/A LETTERS OF CREDIT AMOUNT Letter of Credit to be provided by the Owners to ensure completion of all works required N/A under the terms of this Agreement, as noted in Section 5 herein. '?fir ~'~ ~ T~? WNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE REPORT Report No. To: Committee of the Whole Prepared By: BP 2008-021 Adam Kozlowski, Planner Meeting Date: Subject: Site Plan Agreement Motion # April 16, 2008 and removal of Hold 2008-SPA-02 Rall #: (Barry & Nancy Gardhouse) R.M.S. File #: D11 37656 4346-010-010-15200 LOT 28, PLAN 626 ORO; ORO-MEDONTE Being all of PIN 74040-0132 (LT) 104 Lakeshore Promenade RECOMMENDATION(S): Requires Action For Information Only It is recommended: 1. THAT Report No. BP 2008-021 be received and adopted. 2. THAT the Township of Oro-Medonte enters into a Site Plan Agreement with Barry & Nancy Gardhouse to construct a deck on the front of the existing dwelling at 13 O'Connell Lane. 3. THAT the Clerk prepares a By-law far Council's consideration to enter into a Site Plan Agreement with Barry & Nancy Gardhouse. 4. THAT the Clerk prepare a By-law for Council's consideration to remove the Holding Symbol from lands described as 104 Lakeshore Promenade, LOT 28, PLAN 626 ORO; ORO-MEDONTE Being all of PIN 74040-0132 (LT). 5. AND THAT the owners be notified of Committee's decision. BACKGROUND: The owner is proposing to construct a deck on the front of an existing dwelling. Application for building permit has been applied for respecting the structure. As Lakeshore Promenade is not a vehicle thoroughfare, the applicant's dwelling does therefore not have frontage on a municipal road, and is appropriately zoned "RLS (H)". As such, the owner must enter into a Site Plan Agreement prior to the removal of the Holding Symbol and issuance of a Building Permit. PLANNING DEPARTMENT Meeting Date April 16, 2008 Report No. BP 2008-021 Page 1 of 5 ANALYSIS: The subject lands are Zoned Residential Limited Service (Hold) (RLS (H)) Zone; the Hold applies to certain lands within the municipality that do not front on a municipally- assumed road. Permitted uses in the RLS (H) Zone include single detached dwellings, accessory buildings, and boathouses. As such, the applicant's proposal to construct a deck would constitute a renovation to an existing permitted use. That applicant was required to apply far a Minor Variance (application 2008-A-03) from the Committee of Adjustment for the placement of the proposed deck; specifically, a reduction far the front yard setback from the required 7.5 metres to 4.07 metres to Lakeshore Promenade was granted by the Committee on February 21, 2008. (See Schedule 2 -Committee of Adjustment Decision) Aside from the front yard setback, the proposed deck would otherwise comply with all other setbacks as required by Zoning By-law 97-95. FINANCIAL: N/A. POLICIESILEGISLATION: Township of Oro-Medonte Official Plan Township of Oro-Medonte Zoning By-law 97-95 The Planning Act, Section 36 CONSULTATIONS: A Site Plan Control Technical Committee Meeting was held on April 3, 2008. The meeting was attended by the applicants. No concerns were raised by Township staff at this meeting. ATTACHMENTS: Schedule 1: Location Map Schedule 2: Committee of Adjustment Decision Schedule 3: Site Plan Agreement PLANNING DEPARTMENT Meeting Date April 16, 2008 Report No. BP 2008-021 Page 2 of 5 coNC~usloly: The application to construct a deck on the front of an existing dwelling constitutes a permitted use, and notwithstanding the variance for reduced front yard setback, the deck would otherwise comply with all requirements of the RCS (H) Zane. It is recommended that Site Plan Application 2008-SPA-02 be approved. Respectfully submitted' Adam Kozlowski Planner Department Head Comments: t Dept. Head Approval '~ ~~. ~ Date: ' ~ ~ a C.A.O. Comments: C.A.O. Approval: Date: PLANNING DEPARTMENT Meeting Date April 16, 2008 Report No. BP 2008-021 Page 3 of 5 SCHEDULE 1: LOCATION MAP 2008-SPA-02 (GARDHOUSE) ~. ~~ ^ ~~6 11~ ~ ~} ,Y~~ t y S~ PN y SUBJECT LANDS ` ,~-~ h~ 104 LAKESHORE PROMENADE ,;. . ~ ''~: ~. ~ .,. _~ - ~: ,~ ", "~ ~ ; PEE,. PR~MEN= W P~ESNOR~ L Cn~ ~ .. ~~ a~~ ;.~ ~,, m~. E PROMENADE PKE51'`~R L PLANNING DEPARTMENT Meeting Date April 16, 2008 Report No. BP 2008-021 Page 4 of 5 SCNEDU~E 2: COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT DECISION 2008-SPA-02 (GARDHOUSE) ~, I'.~1GI # 2 AI'I'LICATIaN 20f18-A-43 CQhI1ti~IT'I'EE Oi~ riIIJL~STMhl'tiT I)FCISIQI'V Mc~tivn No. CA080221- 8 BE IT KES©LVEI) that: 1Vloved by Garry Patter, seconded by Lynda Aiken "Committee approve ivsinor Variance 2008-1~-03, being to grant a reductir~n for the front yard setback from 75 metres to 4.07 metres for the construction of a deck hat ing a floor area of 26 square metres, subject to the following conditions: _._ 1. Thai an Ontario Land Surveyor provide verification to the "t"ownship of compliance with the Committee's decision by '1} pirutirig the footutg and 2~ verifying in writing prior tc poaring of the foundation by way of surveylreal property report so that.: a} the deck be located no closer than.. 4.07 metres from the front lot line 2. That the applicant enter into a Site Plan Agreement with the Township, including removal of the Holding Provision; 3. That the applicant receive any necessary permits andlor approvals from the Lake Simcoe Kegion Conservation Authority, if required; 4. That the appropriaie building permit. be obtained from the Township's Chief Building Official on1Y after the Committee's decision becomes final and binding, as provided for within the Planning Act R,S.O. 1990, c.P. 13. ...Carried." Additional infarnlation regarding this Application is ati°ailable for public inspection at the 'Township old Oro-Medonte Administration Centre, 1.48 Line 7 South in C7ro Station, Ontario; Motrday to Friday, between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p:m. PLANNING DEPARTMENT Meeting Date April 16, 2008 Report No. BP 2008-021 Page 5 of 5 APPENDIX "A" SITE PLAN AGREEMENT -between - BARRY GARDHOUSE NANCY JOAN GARDHOUSE (As joint tenants) - and - THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE DESCRIPTION OF LAND LOT 2$, PLAN 626 ORO; ORO-MEDONTE Being all of PIN 74040-0132 (LT) 104 Lakeshore Promenade Roll # 4346-010-010-15200 TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE COUNTY OF SIMCOE APRIL, 2048 By-Law No. 2008- THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE SITE PLAN AGREEMENT TABLE OF CQNTENTS Section 1 Covenants by the Qwners Section 2 Covenants by the Township Section 3 Development Restrictions Section 4 Development Changes Section 5 Security Section 6 Compliance Section 7 Co-operation Section 8 Binding Effect Section 9 Severability of Clauses Section 10 Save Harmless SCHEDULES Schedule "A" legal Description of Lands Schedule "B" Site Plan Schedule "C" Deeds and Easements to be Conveyed Schedule "D" Itemized Estimate of Cost of Construction SITE PLAN CONTROL AGREEMENT This Agreement made, in quadruplicate, this day of 200t"3, in accordance with Section 41 of the Planning Act. BETWEEN: BARRY GARDHOUSE NANCY JOAN GARDHOUSE (As joint tenants} Hereinafter called the "Owners" PARTY OF THE FIRST PART -and- THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE Hereinafter called the "Township" PARTY OF THE SECOND PART WHEREAS the Owners have applied to the Township of Oro-Medonte to permit the construction of a deck on the existing house on lands described in Schedule "A", attached hereto; AND WHEREAS the Township has enacted a By-law to provide for the designation of the lands as a "Site Plan Control Area"; AND WHEREAS the Owner intends to develop the lands in accordance with the Site Plan attached hereto as Schedule "B"; NOW THEREFORE This Agreement Witnesseth THAT in consideration of the mutual covenants hereinafter contained, the parties hereto hereby covenant and agree as follows: 1. COVENANTS BY THE OWNERS The Owners covenant and agree as follows: a} The Owners awn the subject lands described in Schedule "A", attached hereto, and have provided the Township with a Registered Deed containing the legal description of the subject lands. b} This Agreement may be registered against title to these subject lands and shall take priority over any subsequent registrations against the title to the subject lands. c} No work shall be performed an the lands, nor any use made of the subject lands with respect to the proposed development, except in conformity with all the provisions of this Agreement. d} The Owners shall, prior to the execution at this Agreement, obtain ail necessary permits and approvals from the Township and from all Ministries and Agencies, including, but not limited ta, the County of Simcoe. e} The Owners shall, prior to the execution of this Agreement, pay all municipal taxes and charges related to obtaining the approval of these lands for the intended use. f} The Owners shall pay a refundable deposit far such reasonable costs as may be involved to the Township in having its solicitor, engineer, planner and staff, perform any work in connectipn with this Agreement, including the preparation, drafting, execution, and registration of this Agreement. The Owners acknowledge and agree that the Owners shall be responsible for the cost of performance of all the Owner's obligations hereunder, unless the context otherwise requires. Every provision of this Agreement, by which the Owners are obligated in any way, shall be deemed to include the words "at the expense of the Owners", unless specifically stated otherwise. The refundable deposit for expenses and actual cast shall be $N1A. The Owners shall replenish the refundable deposit, to its full amount, when the expenses and actual casts are submitted by the Township. g} The Owners shall have delivered to the Township, ail TransferslDeeds, Discharges and Easements, or other documents required by Schedule "C", as well as certification from the Owners solicitor that the Transfer/Deeds and Easements shall provide the Township with good title, free and clear from all encumbrances. h} The Owners agree that prior to issuance of a Building Permit, a Sewage System Permit approval must be received by the Township/Ministry of the Environment. The Owners acknowledge that the lot does not front an an improved public road, that the Township does not ar is not required to maintain or snowplow the said road, that the Township will not take over ar assume the private road as a Township public road or street unless it has been built according to the Township standards, then in force, and that the Township is not liable far any injuries, losses or damages as a consequence of the Township issuing a Building Permit. 2. COVENANTS BY THE TOWNSHIP The Township covenants and agrees as follows: a} That the Township has enacted a By-law to permit the construction of a deck on the existing house described on the Site Plan. b) That the Township agrees that subject to compliance by the Owners with all relevant Municipal By-laws and Provincial Statutes and Regulations, the Owners may proceed to develop the subject lands, as indicated on the Site Plan attached hereto as Schedule "B", subject to the development restrictions contained herein. 3. DEVELOPMENT RESTRICTIONS The Parties hereto acknowledge and agree that any use of the subject lands by the Owners shall be an and subject to the following terms and conditions: a} Site Plan The use and development of the subject lands shall be in accordance with and as set out on the Site Plan, attached hereto as Schedule "B". b) Li htin All lighting systems installed outside, such as floodlights, shall be directed away from any adjacent residential use andJor roadway, not to cause interference in any way. c} Parking Areas and Drivewa r~s All parking areas and driveways shall be constructed in conformity with Sections 5.19 and 5.20 of By-law No. 97-95, as amended, and the Ontario Building Code Regulation #419/86, and such parking areas, loading, and access areas shat! be kept free and clear of snow and ice and kept adequately drained. All entrances shall be constructed, as in Schedule "B" attached. The Owners agrees to obtain all necessary approvals from the Ministry of Transportation, County of Simcoe and Township of Oro-Medonte. d) Outside Storage No outside storage shall be permitted between any buildings on the premises and any street. Any other outside storage shall be captained in the fenced compound, as identified an Schedule "B". e} Garbage Storage The Owners agree to provide suitable storage areas for garbage and waste, as shown on the Site Plan, and to install and maintain litter containers in and around development on the lands. All metal scrap and associated refuse contained in the fenced compound shall be removed on a weekly basis. f) Garbage Collection The Owners acknowledges and agrees that any Industrial, Commercial and Institutional (I. C. & 1) and multi-unit locations (six (6) units and aver) will not receive curb side waste collection services from the County of Simcoe. Each I. C. & I location and multi-unit residential location will be responsible for their awn garbage and recycling disposal. g} Landscaoing The Owners shall complete all landscaping and landscaped areas shown on the Site Plan, attached as Schedule "B", as soon as weather permits, and all grading and sodding required, according to any Engineering drawings submitted, shall be done on all lawn areas. h) Erosion and Siltation Control The Owners must take all necessary precautions to prevent erasion and sedimentation of ditches and culverts, slopes, etc., within the Site Plan, and downstream prior to and during construction. The Owners agree to maintain all erosion and siltation control devices in good repair until vegetative cover has been successfully established. 4. DEVELOPMENT CHANGES The parties acknowledge and agree that there shall be no changes to this Agreement or the Schedules attached hereto, unless and until such changes have been approved by all parties. It is the intention of the parties that material amendments to this Agreement be properly recorded. Such amendments may take the form of a registered Amending Agreement, an unregistered Agreement, exchange of correspondence, Memorandum of Confirmation, or notations on Engineering drawings. The nature of such record of amendment shall depend on circumstances. Y n t 5. SECURITY Prior to signing the Agreement, the Owners will deposit, with the Treasurer of the Township, to cover the faithful performance of the obligations of the Owners arising under this Agreement, including but not limited to the construction of the works and services identified in Schedule "D" to this Agreement (the "said Work"}, the following securities: a} Cash in the amount of one hundred percent (100°l°} of the estimated cost of the said work, as approved by the Township Engineer and Township Council, or: b} An irrevocable Letter of Credit from a chartered bank, issued in accordance with the requirements of Schedule "E", with an automatic renewal clause in the amount of one hundred percent (100°l°} of the estimated casts of the said works, and as approved by the Township Engineer. The Letter of Credit shall be for a minimum guaranteed period of one (1 }year, or such time as the Township decides, and shall be renewed automatically, as necessary, thirty (30} days prior to expiration. c} The Township reserves the right to accept or reject any of these alternative methods of providing securities. Prior to depositing the securities, the Owners Engineer shall submit an estimate of the cost of the works to the Township Engineer for approval. When the cost estimate has been approved, it will be set out in Schedule "D" of this Agreement and will become the basis for the limits of the securities. d} Any Letter of Credit or security filed with the Township is based upon the estimated cost of completing the various matters prescribed by this Agreement. However, all Letters of Credit and security received by the Township may be used as security for any item or any other matter which, under the terms of this Agreement, is the responsibility of the Owners, including without limiting the generality of the foregoing, payment of engineering, legal, planning or other casts incurred by the Township, which are the responsibility of the Owners, under the terms of this Agreement. e} Upon written notification by the Owners agent, certifying that all required works for which the Letter of Credit was submitted have been completed in accordance with the plans submitted and upon confirmation by the Township or its agent that the Owners obligations under this Agreement have been completed, the Township will return said Letter of Credit. f} If in the event of default of the Owners under any of the provisions of this Agreement, it becomes necessary for the Township to realize on its security or deposits, then the Township shall give, by registered mail, twenty-one (21 }day's notice, its intent to draw down on the security or deposit. 6. GOMPt_IANGE Any action taken by the Township or on its behalf, pursuant to this Agreement, shall be in addition to and without prejudice to any security or other guarantee given on behalf of the Owners for the performance of its covenants and agreements herein, and upon default on the part of the Owners hereunder, the Township shall, in addition to any other remedy available to it, be at liberty to utilize the provisions of Section 427 of the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c. 25, as amended. 7. GO-OPERATION The Owners consent to the registration of this Agreement by the Township, upon the title of the subject lands, at the expense of the Owners and agree to execute such further and other documents, consents or applications, as required, far the purpose of securing registration and giving effect to the provisions of this Agreement. $. BINDING EFFECT This Agreement, and everything contained herein, shall be binding upon the successors and assigns of the parties hereto, and upon the lands described in Schedule "A", attached hereto, such Schedule being a legal description of the lands, and it is further agreed that this Agreement shall be prepared, approved and registered on title. 9. SEVERABI~ITY OF CLAUSES Should any section, subsection, clause, paragraph, or provision of this Agreement be declared by a Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the Agreement as a whale ar any part thereof, other than the provision so declared to be invalid. 10. SAVE HARMLESS The ©wners, on behalf of i#self, its successors and assigns, agree to indemnify and save harmless, the Township from and against any and all claims, suits, actions and demands whatsoever, which may arise either directly or indirectly by reason of any work or service performed by the Township, its servants ar sub-contractors in order to complete the work or services required to be completed under this Agreement, provided the subject matter of such action, suits, claims ar demands was not caused intentionally ar through gross negligence an the part of the Township, its servants or agents or sub-contractors. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereunto have affixed their respective seals under the hands of their proper officers duly authorized in that behalf. ~7 ~ ,~ SIGNED, SEALED AND DELIVERED } ~,'~ `'> ~<-,_ ~ -~. } Owner: Barry Gardhouse } }~ ~ }y r,~' ./ ' '`ice } O ne,~:~Nan¢y Joan Gardhouse } /, }The Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte } } per: } } N.S. Hughes, Mayor } } J. Douglas Irwin, Clerk } SCHEDULE "A" NOTE: It is understood and agreed that this Schedule farms part of the Site Plan Agreement between the Township of Oro-Medonte and Barry Gardhouse and Nancy Jaan Gardhouse. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF LANQS LOT 28, PLAN 626 ORO; ORO-MEDONTE Being aU of PIN 74040-0132 (LT} 104 Lakeshore Promenade Roii # 4346-01Q-010-15200 r SCHEDULE "B" NOTE: It is understood and agreed that this Schedule farms part of the Site Plan Agreement between the Township of Oro-Medonte and Barry Gardhause and Nancy Joan Gardhouse. SITE PLAN Site Plan drawing "FIEF DECK07349" dated December 15, 2007, is not in a registerable farm and is available from the Township of Ora-Medonte. ~`. SCHEDULE "C" NOTE: It is understood and agreed that this Schedule forms part of the Site Plan Agreement between the Township of Oro-Medonte and Barry Gardhouse and Nancy Joan Gardhouse. DEEDS AND EASEMENTS TO BE CONVEYED All title documents shall be properly drawn and executed by the parties, with the appropriate Lot or Block Number inserted in the description of the document, and the registered Plan Number shall be left blank, to be inserted by the solicitors far the parties after the Plan is registered and a Plan Number assigned. The consideration for all conveyances shall be the sum of Two Dollars t$2.Q01 and the cost of preparation, execution and registration thereof, shall be borne by the Owners. All documents to be registered shall be prior approved by the solicitor for the Township The following land and easement shall be conveyed. 1.0 t_ANDS TO BE CONVEYED TO THE TOWNSHIP NiA 2.0 DRAINAGE EASEMENTS TO BE CONVEYED TO THE TOWNSHIP NtA to SCHEDULE "[}" NOTE: It is understood and agreed that this Schedule forms part of the Site Plan Agreement between the Township of ©ro-Medonte and Barry Gardhouse and Nancy Joan Gardhause. ITEMIZEQ ESTIMATE OF COST OF CONSTRUCTION ITEMIZE CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE AMQUNT NlA 2 LETTERS OF CREDIT AMOUNT Letter of Credit to be provided by the Owners to ensure completion of all works required NIA under the terms of this Agreement, as noted in Section 5 herein. TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEL?ONTE REPORT Report No. To: Committee of the Whole Prepared By: BP 2008-022 Adam Kozlowski, Planner Meeting Date: Subject: Zoning By-law Motion # April 16, 2008 Amendment 2008-ZBA-02 (Ran McGowan} Roll #: Part of Lots 1 & 2, Range 2 R.M.S. File #: D14 37473 4346-010-007-10300 2243 Ridge Road West RECOMMENDATIONS}: Requires Action X For Information Only It is recommended: 1. THAT Report BP 2008-022 Re: Zoning By-law Amendment for Ron McGowan, Part of Lots 1 & 2, Range 2, 2243 Ridge Road West (Oro), Township of Oro- Medonte, be received. 2. THAT Zoning By-law Amendment Application 2008-ZBA-02, Part of Lots 1 & 2, Range 2, 2243 Ridge Road West (Oro), Township of Oro-Medonte, proceed to a Statutory Public Meeting in accordance with the provisions of the Planning act. BACKGROUND: The purpose of this report is to consider a proposed Zoning By-law Amendment Application submitted by Ron McGowan on December 17, 2007. This rezoning application has been submitted to fulfill a condition of approval for Consent Application 2007-8-17, which was granted by the Committee of Adjustment on November 15, 2007. The applicant's lands are located south of Ridge Road West and west of Bay Street, being Part of Lots 1 & 2, Range 2. ANALYSIS: The Zoning By-law Amendment Application is proposed to rezone the lot from the Residential Limited Service *Hold (RL.S*H) Zone to the Shoreline Residential (SR) Zane to accurately reflect the intended residential use of the property, and to recognize that the proposed severed and retained lands will front on a municipal road, to be constructed by the applicant as a condition of the original consent application. The land PLANNING DEPARTMENT Meeting Date April 16, 2008 Report No. BP 2008-022 Page 1 of 5 subject to the severance contains a single detached dwelling and accessory building, and is accessed via a shared driveway that runs south from Ridge Road. The proposed severed lot is vacant, with intent of the future construction of a single detached dwelling, } which constitutes a permitted use in both the current RLS*H and proposed SR Zones. FINANCIAL: Not applicable. POL_ICIESI<_EGISL.ATION: Township of Ora-Medonte Official Plan: The subject property is designated "Shoreline" by the Official Plan. Permitted uses within the "Shoreline" designation include single detached dwellings, accessory structures to residential uses, and home-based businesses. It is noted that the creation of new lots by way of severance is permitted within the Shoreline designation, and that the proposed severed and retained lands conformed to applicable severance policies as contained in Section D2.2.1 of the Plan. Zoning By-law 97-95: The subject property is zoned Residential Limited Service *Nold (RLS*H) Zone. The proposed severed lot would consist of 1.02 hectares, and would have 30 metres of frontage on the new road to be constructed by the applicant, proposed to extend southerly from Ridge Road. The proposed retained lands would consist of approximately 1.4 hectares, and also maintain 32 metres of frontage on the proposed new road. With respect to severance policies contained in the Official Plan, Section D2.2.1 d} indicates that that the severed and retained lots "[have] adequate size and frontage for the proposed use in accordance with the Zoning By-law..." The SR Zone requires a minimum lot frontage of 30 metres, and a minimum lot area of 0.2 hectares for a residential use. As such, the proposed severed and retained lots would comply with the minimum requirements of the Shoreline Residential Zone. CONSULTATIONS: Several external agencies were consulted with respect to the original consent application. With respect to the proximity of Lake Simcoe, the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority (LSRCA) provided comments indicating "no objection" to the creation of a new lot, and that a development permit would be required for the future construction of a dwelling on the severed lot, as the southern portion of these lands fall within the "regulated area" limits. The County of Simcoe also indicated "no objection" in principle to the creation of a new lot by way of severance. With respect to the proposed road to run southerly from Ridge Road West to provide frontage for the severed and P<_ANNING DEPARTMENT Meeting Date April 16, 2008 Report No. BP 2008-022 Page 2 of 5 retained lands, the County would require the Township to apply for an entrance permit and provide all engineering design drawings to the County for review. This requirement and all associated costs will be borne by the applicant, where the proposed new road would then be assumed and thence maintained in future by the Township. } ATTACHMENTS: Schedule 1: Location Map Schedule 2: Rezoning Proposal CONCLUSION: Staff received the Zoning By-law Amendment Application on December 17, 2047, being a Condition of Consent far Application 2447-8-17. To date, the applicant has been actively working toward fulfilling the conditions imposed by the Committee of Adjustment. It is therefore appropriate for Zoning By-law Amendment Application 2048- ZBA-42 to proceed to a statutory Public Meeting at this time. Respectfully submitted: Reviewed by: ~~ dam Kozlowski Planner Bruce Hoppe, MCIP, RPP Director, Building & Planning Services C.A.O. Comments: C.A.O. Approval: _ A Date: PLANNING DEPARTMENT Report No. BP 2008-022 Meeting Date April 16, 2008 Page 3 of 5 ~CHEDU~E 1: L©CATIC?Rl MAP 2008-ZBA-02 (McGowan) P<_ANNING DEPARTMENT Meeting Date April 16, 2008 Report No. BP 2008-022 Page 4 of 5 SCHEDULE 2: REZONING PROPOSAL 2008-ZBA-02 (McGowan) ~~d _5 PROPOSED ROAD ~ TO PROVIDE ACCESS TO SEVERED AND RETAINED LANDS 226 METRES LONG ~~ ~~~ SUBJECT LANDS 2243 RIDGE ROAD WEST RETAINED AND SEVERED LANDS TO BE REZONED FROM RLS*H ZONE TO SR ZONE Lake Simcoe ti j i" r ~ I i~ .~ ~_..__-.._ PLANNING DEPARTMENT Meeting Date April 16, 2008 Report No. BP 2008-022 Page 5 of 5 TDWNSHlP 4F t~RQ-MEDONlE REPORT Report No. To: Prepared By: FD-2008-02 Committee of the Whole S. Cowden, Director Meeting Date: Subject: Motion # April 16 2008 Filling Vacancies-Volunteer Roll #: Fire Fighters R.M.S. File #: RECOMMENDATION(S): Requires Action For Information Only^X It is recommended that: 1. This report be received and adapted. BACKGROUND: Staff report FD 2006-11 Report on OFM Monitoring and Fire Department Update ANALYSIS: There are currently 21 vacancies in the ranks of our volunteer fire fighters. Last year, 11 fire fighters left the Department for various reasons: five were separated due to inability to maintain the Departments' minimum attendance requirements, two resigned, and four moved out of the area. Our establishment is 24 fire fighters per station at four of our six stations, and 28 fire fighters at the two stations housing Rescue Squads to better manage the extra workload. Maintaining these staffing levels will keep us on par with other Departments in Simcoe County. Having sufficient fire fighters to respond in each of our six fire station response areas is one of the critical elements the Department must meet to help ensure community safety. The Department will conduct a recruiting drive similar to that conducted in 2006, which bolstered our numbers and improved our response capabilities in a number of areas. FIRE AND EMERGENCY SERVICES DEPARTMENT April 16 2008 Report No. FD 2008-02 Page 1 of 3 _r .~u An advertisement will be placed in local media and messaging signs will be placed in front of fire stations to solicit applications. Candidates meeting our minimum requirements will be tested to help ensure their suitability to serve through both written and physical means. Emphasis is also placed on availability, as bolstering our response capabilities on weekdays is a high priority. The candidates selected from this process will receive aver 64 hours of intensive training before being assigned to their home stations. It will take approximately 94 days to complete this program and deliver the new fire fighters to their stations. FINANCIAL: Unlike the past two recruit classes, these recruits will largely be outfitted from our supply of reserve personal protective equipment. Items such as boots and gloves will be issued new, but helmets, bunker pants and jackets, pagers and other items will be drawn as available from items in stack. This will reduce the equipment casts of putting these staff into the field. Recruit fire fighters are not paid for the 64-hour training period. Our staffing expenses are limited to Instructor time. A recruit class requires 344-Intstructar-hours at $18/hr. [$5540 approx] from our allotted Training budget. Cost of running the overall program: $9444. POLICIES/LEGISLATION: Fire Prevention and Protection Act Occupational Health and Safety Act CONSULTATIONS: Deputy ChieflMgr. of Operations District Officers CAO HR Manager FIRE AND EMERGENCY SERVICES DEPARTMENT April 16 2008 Report No. FD 2008-02 Page 2 of 3 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Report FD 2046-11 CONCLUSION: Respec fully submitted: Scott P. Cowden Director SMT Approval /Comments: C.A.Q. Approval /Comments: FIRE AND EMERGENCY SERVICES DEPARTMENT April 16 2008 Report No. FD 20Q8.02 Page 3 of 3 2 ~~ z~`~, ~ KY k '""f ~ : ~ ~T d =:. ~' --~~= r TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE R~~'tJRT Dept. Report No. To: Council Prepared Bar: FD 2f30fi-t 1 Scott Cowden, Director Subject: Department: Council Fire And Emergency Services Fire and Emergency Services Department status report to C. of W. , -,„'. Council Date: Monitoring of OMFES by the Jut ~ 20f)fi Motion # ~~ Office of the Ontario Fire R.M. File #• Marshal Date: 1v~~ ~ ~ , ~„c~~~ Roil #: BACKGROUND: In the fall of 2005, the Office of the Fire Marshal responded to concerns expressed by a District Chie# of this Department about the shortcomings in responding to emergencies within the Township. Qn January 9th of this year, on my first day as Director of the Department, Mayer Craig, CAO ~ieleniewski and I met wi#ft two representa#ives of the Fire Marshal's office to review the issues and implement a process by which the Fire Services performance would be observed. As noted later in this report, this occurred between March 1$` and April 30t". Also included in this report is an update regarding the situation, `as found,' and steps that we've taken since the beginning of the year to improve the fire service, improve our ability to respond to a declared emergency and to effect good Nealth and Safety practices across the Corporation. ANALYSIS: The fallowing paragraphs outline my initial assessment of the state of this department. For the purposes of brevity only major issues will be addressed in this report. Fire suppression This fire department responds to salts for emergency service from six #ire stations utilizing sixteen di#ferent apparatus. There are currently an average of seventeen #irefighters per station. In 2005, the department responded to 525 cads for service. After reviewing the state of the buildings, vehicles, equipment, training and stafifing level department I offer #hese comments. It would seem that departmen# has run for an extended period of time on a, `status quo,' level of performance. According to the records that were available early this year, #raining has been limited to small amounts delivered an a casual basis without any discernible ar recognizable program being applied. The firefighter curriculum as applied by the office of the Qn#ario Fire Marshal would, on the surface, appear to provide the checks and balances required to field an effective fire fighting force. In practical terms, however, the program does little to ensure that firefighters receive the training #hey need #a be truly able to camba# the effects of fire. I have found that the majority of our staff are committed to the community and want the Departmen# to succeed, but have not received the leadership or resources they require to effectively respond to emergencies. The vehicles which we use to respond to emergency calls vary in age from some less than a year old to one unit in its 28#" year in fron# line service. There are several other vehicles over twenty years old. These were in various s#ates of repair with no formal program for maintenance to ensure that they were ready to go on a moment's notice. The equipmen#, the tools which our firefighters use to rescue entrapped people and extinguish fires falls below minimum acceptable leuels both in state of repair and in quantity. Even the basics such as hose, nozzles, axes and prybars are in short supply. There has been no standardization applied across the department in terms of which trucks carry what types of equipment. bastfy, but most importantly, is the primary resource a# any fire department-people. It is absolutely imperative that enough trained personnel reach the scene of an emergency in a timely enough manner to have any real chance to affect rescue and prevent further injury or damage. Currently, some of our fire stations can barely muster two individuals to respond to emergencies at same points during the day. As with most other volunteer fire services our weekday response is our weakest. t)ur average single station response varies be#ween four and 8 personnel responding to any given call. An effective firefigh#ing force requires two to three #imes that number of staff on scene to effect rescue and begin #irefighting opera#ions and a single family dwelling fire. More complex buildings such as those found at some of our resorts and eider care facilities require even more personnel. Facilities The building stack of the Department varies similarly to the vehicles. There are two relatively new stations, one in Moonstone, the other at Horseshoe Valley, #hat have modern amenities and generally meet the needs of their lava! communities. The other four stations vary from minimally meeting requirements fa being signifigan#ly substandard, being too small, in poor shape, and poorly maintained. Electrical safety problems, hygiene problems caused by paar water quality, water Peaks and other defects were found during initial inspections. Station fVa. 1 has only 2.5 feet of clearance on 3 sides of the vehicles from the station waifs, not allowing far maintenance or training to occur while the vehicles sit in their bays. There is na roam to stare spare equipment, and little raarn to train staff during winter months. Fire prevention As with fire suppression operations fire prevention has been addressed casually with na formal program in place to address issues within the community. Regular inspections have been conducted in schools and in some other facilities on an annual basis and our jointly-owned Kiwani's Club Fire Safety pause makes annual visits to our seven elementary schools, but little other substantive work had been done. The physical file system tracking inspections was in disarray. _~_ The required public education program ou#lined in the Fire Prevention and Protection Act, 1997, had never been enacted. Adminisfra#ive issues The administration process is applied in this department were probably its weakest link, Prior to my taking command, paperwork was largely stacked, `vertically,' meaning it was simply kept in piles an desks or in, `Tupperware,' type containers. There was virtually no organized filing system. Tracking of staff attendance and payments has been on forms submitted sporadically from the various stations without any audit process in place. There has been na required health and safety process applied since November, 2004. There has been little Command process for the fire service applied. Required processes and operational guidelines such as incident Command and Fire Fighter Accauntabitity had not been addressed ar enacted in any meaningful manner. In order to ensure uniformity of response to emergencies fire departments across the continent commonly use a series of documents tatted Standard ©perating Guidelines. These documents are used to train staff to ensure that under trying conditions staff act appropriately and safety to the broad range of emergencies. This Department has only a rudimentary list of guidelines that fail to address many of the situations a firefighter would see potentially putting themselves and others at risk. The radio communication system of which construction had been s#arted in 2003 was still incomplete in January of this year. flniy half of the physical infrastructure had been erected, causing delays in dispatching, poor reception and other eommunicatians problems in the field. Many of these issues had been brought to light to the o#fice of the Qntario Fire Marshal in the fate fall of 2005, who opted #o monitor the responses of the fire department to determine whether ar not the Township was in compliance with the Fire Prevention and Protection Act and that the appropriate level of services was being provided to the community. After meetings to discuss the program and of the research that was to be done, monitoring of the department occurred between March 15' and April 30"'this year. As noted in the C?FM's fetter of June 19"', the fire marshal requested information from us for responses to reported structure fires wi#hin Township. They then analyzed the data soaking at response times,. call processing times and number of staff on scene to determine whether ar not the basics of fire suppression were being met. The Fire Marshal's office provided the following recommendations as part of their report: "The Office of the Fire Marshal encourages the Township of ©ro-Medonte to take the necessary steps to improve your emergency response staffing sa that your fire department is achieving the best passible response time far the rural areas of your municipality „ • Develop written response protocols and train staff in their respansibifities, • Continue to respond to all reported structure fires as a multi station response to ensure adequate staffing. This includes all reported alarm calls; • Reassess your current 45% response expectation to emergencies; • Create written policy or guidelines which address haw firefighters respond to the station to drive emergency vehicles, the number of personnel in those vehicles before they proceed to the scene and directions to other personnel on how to proceed once emergency vehicles have left the station; -3- .~ • The fire department develop a method of tracking and recording the arrival times of firefighters arriving on the scene in their personal vehicles. Accountability is an integral par# of an incident management system and should be reinforced through its use or incorporation into practice scenarios. The development of a policy guideline on this subject matter will reinforce this point. Remedial actions taken in 2Q06 We have made great strides this year to address many of the issues outlined in this report. • An annual training calendar for all firefighters is being produced and will be enacted within the nex# 30 days. Our Manager of Operations, Hugh Murray and Chief Training Officer Murray Longman are now responsible for ensuring that sta#f in all six stations receive the same training at the same time and to the same standard so that our ability to work together at emergency scenes is enhanced. Additionally, weekend, `make up,' sessions will be will be put in place to allow firefighters who missed the normal training nights to remain current. We're instituting a formal vehicle maintenance program. On a quarterly basis the vehicles will be inspected by a licensed Mechanic to ensure that the steering, brakes, lights and other main functions of the vehicle are i00°fa operational. • We have performed a complete department inventory of tools and equipment. We are adding to the equipment complement and standardizing the equipment carried an our pumpers, tankers and rescue squads to ensure that they meet the norms for such vehicles and that there are enough tools in place to effectively fight fire and perform most rescue's. In 2005, the Township received a ~70k Fire Services Grant so that the new equipment will have no capital expense to the community. • We have made subs#antial repairs to the fire stations. Electrical hazards have been eliminated, housekeeping has been improved, and upgrades have been made to make the stations more useful for the staff who work there. • We have assembled the elements of a smoke alarm safety program. We're tracking each encounter with buildings to ensure thot the fire code related issues have been fully addressed and are properly tracked and that smoke alarms are in place where required. • Thanks to the efforts of the Township Glerk and her staff, we have a complete, modern and fully functional filing system. Our files, including administration, budget, fire prevention inspections and response reports, are being property tracked and we are in compliance with all security and privacy legislation. • We now have completed the radio communications system originally planned in 2003. We have had installed and are operating from two transmitter sites and four receiver sites distributed across the Township. We have also managed to de#er the capital expenditure for a new tower in Moonstone until some time in the future by finding some free space on a tower in the area. We're in the second round of system testing we will still require some tweaks and upgrades but we are substantially ahead of where we were at the beginning of the year. • We have commenced compliance with Ontario Health and Safety reputations. New members from the Townships' various worksites have been identified and meetings gave commenced. Issues related to health and safety are being addressed. Gertification training for some of the staf# has been completed and some others are scheduled to attend courses in the fall . • We're making substantial improvements in firefighter safety through the implementation of proper incident management and firefighter accountability guidelines. • We have amended our capital replacement table for our vehicles to meet industry accepted practices of a 20-year service fife for heavy trucks and 15 years for medium duty vehicles. • We will continue to respond to reported building fires dispatching the two closest fire stations. This has a number of different benefits over and above simply sending the appropriate amount of staff. • We have trained Township staff in Emergency Management as required by the Emergency Management Act. We are currently reviewing the Emergency Plan and will be bringing forth amendments to our Emergency Planning bylaw in August, 2006. -4- ` ~ • We have advised our f.~ispatch Contractor, which is the city of Barrie Fire Services, that our expectations for call processing times must be within accepted guidelines provided by the National Fire Protection Association ~NFPA~. They have committed to improve their level of performance through the addition of a third sta## member in the communications centre in July of this year. We will continue to monitor this element of our response, • Administration of firefighter attendance has been brought into acceptable accounting practices. All tracking a fire#ighter attendance is being managed from the Township office as of July 1. We have reviewed the attendance of fire#ighters for the first half of 2006 are taking administrative and disciplinary steps to address attendance issues with the individuals involved to help ensure we get as many staff possible in the field during an emergency. We are beginning to fully track response times of fire fighters traveling to incidents in their personal vehicles. Clocks and sign-in boards will be placed in each fire vehicle over the next month. Fire fighters arriving at an incident will, `sign in,' and note their arrival time to help us track our overall response capability. The Fire Marshal provided information on the spread of fire in Appendix 1 of their letter. The letter noted that OMFES has difficulty getting a fire fighting team to a scene and set up to fight a fire within a 10 minute period. In fact, in 5 t~f the 8 responses to fires studied, two or fewer fire fighters were on scene within ~D minutes. if fire fighting has not begun within 1 Q minutes of the onset of flames, the potential for a fatality of either a resident or a fire fighter is greatly increased. It's understood that in a municipality of the size of Oro-Medonte that travel time is a significant portion of our overall response time and that without building several more fire stations and finding enough volunteers in the area to staff them, travel time will be difficult to reduce. The elements of response that we have more control over are call processing time and turnout time. Having an increased number of staff can also improve overall response time. One of our main concerns remains that of getting sufficient numbers of firefighters to the emergency scene in a rapid fashion. We have concerns about the number of sta#f available to respond on a per station basis. The following table shows the level of staffing at Oro-Medonte fire stations compared to our neighbors. Munici alit No. of Fire F't titers er Stn Tw . of Severn 24 Penetan uishene 2? Tw . of New Tecumseth 35 av Tw . of Ad~ala-Tosorontio 37 T . of Essa 25 Tw . of S rin water 24 Twp. a# Ora-Medonte 17 like other volunteer fire departments in our area, we have expectations for volunteer fire#ighters attendance at emergency scenes. These vary between 30 and 50%. We expect our firefighters over a one year period, to attend a minimum of 45% of the calls that come to their station. if we extend our math #rom the number of staff per station and to the minimum response expectation, we could then only expect on average seven firefighters per station to attend at any given call. This falls below the minimum s#a#f required to be an effective firefighting force even at a relatively small fire. We have done what can be done with the number of staff we currently have to maximize the response, What remains to be addressed is the number of staff in each station. Our recommendation, then, is that we take active steps to ensure that we have enough trained fire#ighters available to fight fires in our community. We are the lowest-staffed per station fire department in the area by a fairly wide margin. OMFES has not set a fixed number of personnel per station. We're recommending 24 staff per station and possibly 28 at the two stations where three apparatus are sta#ioned to achieve staffing levels similar to other departments in the area -5- ` The expenses related to this recommendation our capital expenses for the personal safety equipment and pagers required to put additions( staff in the field, There's also the expense of training additions! staff. As we are already in a recruiting process to replace staff who have retired or resigned from the department over the past year, much of the training expense can be managed within that part of our budget. Average cost for personal protective equipment and pager per firefighter is $2,500.00. No. ofi additional staff E ui ment cast er staff Total 48 X2500. X120,000. We may be able to reduce this cost somewhat through bulk purchases and by the reuse ofi some refurbished equipment. vVe will also incur same expenditures related to honorariums as we will require six additional Captain-rank Officers to properly manage span-of-control issues. Cost per Captain: X540/yr at present. Conclusions The Fire and Emergency Services ©epsrtment has come a long, long way in 6 months. We are proud to note that al} of the recommendations resulting from the Fire Marshal's review of our service were being researched or in-process by the time the letter arrived. That being said, there is still much work #o be done. We have begun to put in place the elements that will provide a goad level of fire and rescue service to our community. Those elements consist of proper levels of well-trained staff; reliable vehicles loaded with the right equipment in fire stations well-suited and located to meet the needs of the community. The changes we have implemented and will implement in the remainder of the year require monitoring and adjusting to ensure that the community receives the best value for their tax dollar. The Master Fire Plan, authored in 2001, needs a thorough review to determine if the conclusions drawn 5 years ago are still valid today so that we can plan for the next 3 to 5 years. RECC?MMENDATIOM S 1. TNAT Report No. FD 2006-11 be received and adopted, Respectfully submitted, rs~ ,.~f 1~ ~ ~~ ~,-;!~,, Scott Cowden Director, Fire and Emergency Services t~~1 ~~.._.-% ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ _g_ O o p ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ CD ~' ~ ~ 0 0~~0 ~ ~ ~ 0 N~~ O 0~ ~o v~ ~ ~ ~' o~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ o ~ o o ~ . ~a o~ O ~D N~ 2 Z 00 C C ~ ~ ~O ~~ rnn vo ~ ~ ~v ~rn ~~ Z G7 ~ L O Z Z G7 ~ ~ ti ~ c~ ~• ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~v Sn ~~ ~ ~ ~ o o ~ y ~_ c~ ~:~ ,~'~, y C ~ n ~ ~ ~ O y ~ cD ~ o ~ o cy=~' ~, ~ y ~ C `C y ~ ~D ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ° ~"~ T ~ ~ ~ ~. o ~ ~ ~ S ~ ~ '~; ~ O ~ 4001` _ ~ ~ ~ ' r ~ ~ ~ ~ o C~ v~ ~ ~~ O a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ CD ~ ~ ~ 8 OO ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ O ~ ~ a ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~- ~ ~. "'~~ ~ ~' c~ 2 p Cn (p O_ ~ '~ O (7 ° s° ~F1 ` mm \V ^ T`, mm m ~~ c~ O (D \V 4_ .. :.,+ m ~~~ ~ O CD ~ ~. C ~ ~ Q ~ ~ O O O J ~' Sv O O ~_ m<m mJm ~ ° lV \V v~~'~ ~~°~ ~~oo ~ ° ~ °o~. ~~~ o v ~ ~ n v ~ ~~ ~ o 0 0 ~ ~ o < ~<O v~< ~cn = ~-~v-a ~ v p-~ O -^ O CD O ~ O ~ CD p ~ C ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ - (D ~ ~ ~ ~p 3 - CD ~ O ~ n . ~ , ~ ~ O '~ ~ O ~ ~ CD O 7 Q O ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O (D CD \ ~ ~ ~~ _ p ° c/~' ~. ~ O O ~p ~ _ ~ ~ rt ~ ~ ~ ~ (p ~ ~ ~ V V ~ ~ ~F ~~ • ~ l V /~ Q ~ /n • ~ O ~ ~ ~ v, ° O . ~ ° ~ ~ < ~ v ° ° ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ v ° (p ~ ~p ~ O ~~ ~ ° ~ 0 ~~-~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~.cn v ~ n•< o o cn~ ~ ~o o ~o ~ ~ m ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~,~ ~ ° ~ c ~ ~ c ~ ~ v o ~ c ,~ o ~~ ~p o~' °~ `~m~~~ v o ~ ~' ~ ,~ °o r+ ~ ; ~ o ~ ° ~~ ~'~ rn ~~~ Q a c~ ~ °~cu -~ ~ ~ ~: m o~ ~ o ~ oc~ ° c~ ' ~ ~' ~ ~ o °. -~ ~ ~ o o .o ~ ~- c~ ~ Q ?i vo° ~,Q oQOO ,~ ° ~o ~ ~m CD ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~O°o v~ ~ ~' v m~ ~ ~. N ° ~' v~' < ~ ~ < can ~ < ~ o gy ~~ ~ Q O ' ~ N ~ O CD ( p 0 .. . N ~ ~ ~ . O cQ 0 ~ O ~ CD < CD ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ O ~_ (D N ~ ~ ~ Q (D ~ Q ~ ~ ~' - -^ cD ~ ~ ~ O cD ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CD ~ ~ Q. Q ~ z CD ~ ~ ,c ~, (D A ~ CD ~ ~ Q ~ << ( D O ~ O O C D ~ ~• ` ' - ~• ' N r,- < O- ' `~ (D ~ ~ ~ n CD p s O - O fp ~ ~ O tn ~ ~ ~ s _ 0 ~ V> ~ ~D CD O ~ CD v ~ ~ (D CQ i cD u v ~ ~ n ~ ~ ~ ~ n ~ fD O c ~ CD ~- CD ~ .-~ ~ Q Q (D ~, <' ~ ~ Q Q ~ ' ^ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (D ~ ~ c0 '~ 1 N~ °~~~~`~~ ~ - O Q CD O ~O-~~ CC~~ ~ ~ CD O ~ ~ CD ~ ~ CD ~ -O (D S ~ fD ~,,~~y I•~ ~' ~ ~G ~' O< ~ ~' ~ O C ~ ~ ~ CD ~ F+.I CD ~ ~ (p ~ ~ -O ~ ~ O~~ O O O~~ CD v fD CD ~ ~ O ~ ~ O ~ O cQ ~ "O ~; ,rt ~ ~ cD cD ~ CQ O c°n ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ v C ~ CD ~ O ~,,,.~ ~ u Q 0 ~ ~ Q C<~D Q ~ ~ O -~ ~ ~ ^ 'rt `G O CD N (D rl j ~ ~ n n ~ (Q ~ ~ O S O C~ p fl? ~ O CD ,y, O CD v - M~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ p ~ O G n O Q =": n v v TI -I cD v~ ~ ~ Q. -~ (D "a cn v u> CQ ~ ~' ~ O_ =~ cn ~ _''• CD ~ T TI ~~~°OC~ic~i~p•~ <.~~concCDn.cn ~momm~rn ~~°~~~~~~o~. CD ~ ~ CD O <. ~" ~- Q ~ ~. n ~ ~ O CD ~ ~ '~ n O .~- ~ CD `-~ CD ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,n_r ~ ~ fA ~ ~ (D CD -y' ~ ~ < O ~ ~ O n ~ Q ~ ~ - CD `G fn 0 ~~~~~~~v ~~~~~o ~'v~-ao ~~~~~~~~ acD o Qcn ,-~,-tQ ~ o ~•m ~ ~~~ =BCD ~ ~ ~ ~ rn ~ ~v ~c~ ~ r,.c~u ~o °~' °~cQO ~ ~ c o• _~ °_ oo~ m cncu~,~ ~ ,~~ o ~ ~ ° o ~ o ~ o' ° v ~ ~ cn ~~ CD C~ o o c ° ~ ~rn ~~ ~'~~ ~ ~. ~ ,•-~ cD <' ~ ,~ ~ O ~ to ~ ~ cD ~ cn ~ ~ ~ ~ (p ~ ,~ cD ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ cD to ~ ~+- ~ n CD ~ ~ ~ cn v ~ o~~v ~~ m~v~~ ~ ~,~~~ .~oa~~~co~~ ~~~c~~ ~ v~~ao vc-cud°~ ~~~~~v~'~mrn °mm~m ~•cn a m g~~~oo~~ ~v~~~ rn~ ~aj~~ ~.°ocn c~ ~ m°cuv~rn co _ rno~ ~ ~~m ~c~~~ v°o ~~~v~ ~• mono ,~~~Q~Q~Q~o ~ ~ ~ ~ -~ ~. CD N N O ~ ~ ~ (D ~ CO Q. ~ ~ ~ ~- ~ ~ ~ CD (D o~o~~'o~~ ~~~rn ~~.~~cn~p ~~avQV~~~~ ~o,~~~oo° ~°cnm° Q~airncu~ n'cn,~,~~~m~QCn y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ D ~: ~~Q~. ~X ~ob ~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ W ~' °O~. cum ~ o • v~c'~n ~~ ~ c ~ u ~' °~ ~. ~~ ~ ~ o rn~ ~ ~ c o~v • ~o ~~ Q~ m ~~ o Q•a' ~ ~~~ o ~ ~ • o-fi ~ ~o m ~, o ~ ~ ~ ~, ~m o~~ Q ~ ~~~ ~, c~ oo ~~ °~' ~~ ° ~~ ~' m ~ °~ ~ m ~~,~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ c~~ ~ ~~ ~ cnm~. cu .o ' ~~~ ~~' ~ Q cQ~ ~ ~~' ~ ~~o . c ~ ~ ~ • ° ~ o ~' ~ cD ° ~ ~ ~ cD con ~ -• o~•iu ~ - ~~ m ~ O -h~ ~ 5' ~,~ cu Ica `~p -° °~' ~ ~ ~rn° o ~,c h o ~ o O ~ ~ ... ~ ~ o Q° ~ ~ ~ • CD ~ ~ ~, -n ~ f7 A7 Q ~ '~ < ~ O p n 0 C7 (D ~ C p~ O ~ 9J ~ fn TI ' - O ' ~ D vl n ~ ~'• `G (D ~ ~ p - C < (/) Q- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ CD ~ Q CD ~ ~ Q FBI C~J y CrJ ~ cfl W v 07 C3~ -P W N ~ O ~ O • a" (p O -o ~ cn v ~ a ~, n ~ ~ H ~ ~ ~ -~ ~ v ~ ~ -0 ~.-o m O -~ -' ~ ~ ~ '(D O ~ ~ ~~ ~ O ~Q < O O O fD ~ O ~ QCD~ p N ~ ~ ~O ,, ~ (~ p ~ N ~ C 0 ( D ~ ~ ~ gy Q ~ v Q N N ~ Q ~ O ~ (D ,~ O ~ ~ O 0 CD ( p ~ O ~ ~ Q (D +, -- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' N CD ~+ ~ ~ ~ < ~ ~ CD ~ (D ~ -~ ~' (D n ' ~ ~ N p ~ n v -p ~ ~ ~ ~ n v (D n (D n ~ v (D ~ ~ O O O ~ ~ n CD ~ -p iU ~ (D ~_ ~ ~ O ~ CD p ~ ~ CD ~ CD cn ~ ~ p v O ~ v v ~ ~ v Q ~ CD O .-~ ~ `G ~ CD ~ (D ~ Q. O CD c n O ~ ~ p N ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ G ~ ~ p cD - ~ ~ 0 CD ~ CD ~ v ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ O ~ p ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ < CD ~ Q ~ CD ~ cD N 2 '"' ~ CD ~ ~_ ~ h ' ~ ~ 1> CD c '~ ~ p (D (~ v ~ ~ CQ ~ Q ~ Q _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ (D ~ ~ ~ CD ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ v ~ O ~ CD (p ~' ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ' n ,_,. O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ O (D ~ ~ ~ Q Q ~ ~ n ~ Q O CD CD ~ ~ ~. CD ~ ~, O ~ ~ Q ~ ~ - O n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .-~ '' N O CD ~ x v ~ cn < (D (D p cn ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ p ~ ~ O O n ~ ' ~ ~ p (D ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ p ~ ~ ~- N ~ ~ ~ ~ .-~ ~ ~ CD O < (D Q Q p a ~? cD ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ CD ~ n~ ~~ O ~ O ~ O CD c (D i u to ~ -~, ~ Q ~ Q v ~ C ~ n ~ ~ CD CD CD ~ p ~ ~ ~ O N ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ O ~ CD ~ ~ ~ cD ~' ~ ~ N D ~ (D ~ C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ CD ~ ~ ~ CD Q- v O ~ cn ,~: < ' ~ ~ ~ ~_ CD ~ ~ ~ O (D n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (D ~ p (D ~ N ~ ~ h cn (D ~ '~ to ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~' -,- ~ v ~ ~ ~ cD n ~ ~ c v ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ (D r,- (Q ~ n ~ ~ ~ ~ CD ~ ~ n ~ D ~ ~' Q ~ h ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ ~-* ' ~ ~' ~ ~ V> ~ O ~ ~ CD ~ CD ~ ~ CQ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -p (p ~ v ~, ~ ~ ~ U) CD ~ Sv O ~ O Q O ~ ~ ~ Q c/> p , _ ~ O (D p ~ (D V> p C7 ~ ~ CAD ~O CD ~ ~ CQ Q ~ ~ v ~ n ~ ~ Q CQ ~ ~ o~oocumva-~~~~vs< o v c .,. ~ Q~2~~oc~c~ cu~~~~m ~,~v v ~ v ~ ~~.v ~QQQc N N Q ~ Q ~ ~ ~ N ~. ~ -S c0 CD ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ (D ~ -~' _. ~ ~G ~ CD n v '~' ~ p ~ ~ CQ O v~~vrn~~~ ~O-'' ~ ~~ v cQ • ~ ~ ~ CD CD _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CD CD O ~ '": ~ CQ ~~ ~.~ ~'~~ ~ fD CD _ _ Z m ~' x ~ ~ D ~~°~< m ~ ~.Q-r'~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~' ~'~ m ~ `~ ~. m . o~ N ~~ ~ O '"' 3 ~ ~. (D ~ ~ ~ ~ cQ ~ v N .~ _Q ~ `G < '~ rt a `~ ~ v Q~ ~ ~ o ~ v ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ v m m ~ ~ v v ~ ~. ~• C O ~~ ~ ~ ~ v n ~ ~ O O) ~' ~ O O o ~ O ' ~ "~ ~ ?~ ~ O = < (Q ~ O O CD ~ ~ (Q ~ CD ~ ~ ' N CD p `< ~'' ~• o~~< ~ ~,<~mCD ~q ~o~~o n cn vv~~c~ ~ v, g Q~~ ~ m'"'~~~ . '~ oQmrnv ~ ~~°~~ ~ .~o~ -~ ~ ~p O cn - ~ CD ~ v O ~ (D fD ~ < ~Q" ~ ~ N O Q . O O . _''• ~ < n ~O ~'~ ~,~+~ Q. C ~ ~ ~ < O ~ O D ~ ~ rn o ~ . o rn ~ ~ ~ cp ~ m sv cn ,~ w Q ~ -o ~ ~~ ~~ N Q~ ~~ ~ o ~ ~ -~ p V ~p - ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ v o ~ v ~• p ~ (D ' ~~~ ,~ ~ ~, ~ p 'C D n ~ _ ,~ ~ `~ ~• ~ ~ v O ~ CD ~ CD ~ -p . O CAD ~ ~ ~ ~ , .~ ~ v ~ O cn ~; ~ O O Q ~ ~ (D fD <. v a~ v v ~ ~~ aacn ~ ~ ~rnc~ d y /~ `M~ I~ y 0 y ly-I ~._. to cn v ~ TI ~ v ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ O (D CD Q `G (p ~ ~ V i ~ ~ N ~, ' ~ cn cn ~ n cQ ~ ~" ~ O v ~ ~ ~ CD (D < ~ n n X ~ ~ ~~ G ~ ~ (D (D CQ --~ O ~ ~ O cn ~ ~ h ~~ ~ Q rt ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. (p ~ O ~ ~' ~ ~-r ~ _~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ O Q O n• Q ~ O ~ ~ X ~ n (D ~ ~ ('~D ~ D (D ai ~ C . CD ~ p ~ c0/> p ~ q j ~ ~ ~ Q. O ~p N ~ ~ CD G ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ X ~ `~ ~ ~ n ~ ~ r+ ~ C7 < ~ ai ~ o N con Q- ~ O O ~ n CD ~ .-~ cD CD ~ - -~. ~ cu ~,o o ~ o ~ v o ~ m ~ ~~ ~• cn cQ o ~ . v rn v v o \~ I ~ ~ O ~•o ~~ c~ o~~CD ~ rn ~ cD ~ (D v ~ ~ ~, o~~~~ ~ Q ~ c~ o ~- ~ m mx~•m O~ ~ N cn ~~ Q ~~~ov v fDO~~D ~ ~ ~ ~ c~ v ~ rn Qo °-~ ~a~ c~o~~ C7 CD ~ n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ChD ~, `G C C7 ~' O (D ~ ~_ cn ~ CD ~ ~ N ~ v ~ ''d ^t 0 ~' C ~. 0 a -~ C7 ~ ~ o~rnv~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o~Q~~ a~ m'~`~~_o ~, ~D~-~~. Q ~ ~ o ~~opv ~~~~~ ~ ~. 3 ~~~~ov ~~v.~Q ~ - -~ ~ ~' ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ oo~~'~ ~o~'~v vo~~'~ ~ Q 3 N. ~ (D ~ Q ~ ~ ~_ ~ cD ~ ~ O. C ~' ~ Q~CQ ~. (D _ O ~ ~ 'a p' O ~ O ~ ~ CQ ~O~ Sv ~ ~ CD ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C G ~ ~ ~ ~ cD ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CD ~' O Q ~ Q ~ v ~ ~ v ~ ' O ~ cD fC ... cD O c n ~ ~ .~ ~~ o :~ .~ Q. ~ ~ 0~ O ~ Q~ ~ ~~ C Qn~~ ~.~ ~~~ ~ '~'~ ~ - G. ~ (~0-++ ~ ~ -+, ~ ~ ~ (O O ~ ~ ~ O A7 r O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~G ~ ~ ,~ < CD (n ~ ~ ~ y J ~ ~ ~ . -t p ~ G < O O n ~ n ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ri- 0 ~ O ~ - ~ ~ ~ O ~ . --h V] ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ Q ~ ~ ~ (A ~ CD -fi ~ ~ ~ ~ Q n ~ CD Q ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ Q. ~ ~ ~ v O ~ ~ `G ~ ~ ~ v C Q - N . .. cn ~ "a CD ~ Q- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~cpDCQ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ G ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ • ~ p ~ O TI ~ (D ~ N 9J ~ n "p ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ `~ O CD ~ ~ CD O - O ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ CD ~ ~ (D ~ r-" ~ ~ O ~, (D v (D (Q cn ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (Q ~ ~ O O ~ ~ ~ (p ~ ~ O cn (D ~ cD ~ ~ CD ~ ~ cn ~ CD ?c ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ =+:Cn~ C ~ ~ ~,~,~ . C ~ cn =~ (O • ~ C7 O~ OJT CQ O CD _~~ ~ C7 (p ,-~ 3~ ~.~'~ ~oD~ ~ ~ ~ ~a~oo m~ ~~ ~~QOO' cQ ~ a o ~ ~o con v -,, ~ s ~~vv ~ ~.m ~ v ~ s~~ ~cQ ~' ~ rn o . ~cQ~~ a ... ~s s ~s D .r 0 O I~ O ~~y C /~+ ~.~y~ ICI ~I /'r D~ ~ ~ ~_ _rt _r _rt _ ~~ O O O O O O y• 7 3 7 ~ 3 ~ '+ ~ ~ ~ W N j _~ ~ O ~ C W J /~ cD cfl s ~ O r° ° ~ ~ O ~ .-r oo ~ ~ (~D co = ° s O ~ N ~ .-~ ~ ~ S o~ y r ~ c~u5y ~ ~ cuCcn ~ ~ <~ ~ pa m0`< ~ c n m~cn ~ <~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ -a~ ~ rn ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ,~ cu O v ~ O rv cQ W ~--~ Q ~ (p (Q ~ ~ (D ~ .] W ~ ~ = ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ (D (D fD Q ~ ~ T O z (Q O Q. ~~~ ~ Z ga. °~ ~~~ Z ~~.~' °o ~ wv ~' ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ nQ C ~ o ~ ~ Q- N ~ O ~ ~ C r < ~ n . ° ' m ~ ' o s a ~ < ~ CD ~ ~ ,~ , ~ ~. ~' _r ~ ~ ° O ~ o ~ ~ ~ m ~ `~ z ~ v X UQ O 6' CD A~ O O O O ~^ l I O n ~~ N ,~ p ~ O v, ~ Q. ~ ~ ~ ~ (Jq O C ~ ~ < ~ ~ O ~ O ~ y O ~ ~ ~~ O~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ O.. coo = w ~ ~ cn ~ ~ _ .fl CD '-' cu C < ~ n ~ CD ~ p _ O c ~ ~' ~ ~ O ~ ~ -: O.. ~ D . O ~ ~ ~ fl.. ~ O' O ~ ~ ~ ~ P~ ~ ~ ~ O (D -r ~' CAD ~ ~ ~ ~ -~ ~' ~ CD cn -' ~ ~ ~ d ~ r , ~ ~ ~ . -. ~ O fl.. C1 ~ ! D ¢- p .a . ~ ~ ~ ..~ ~ ~ ~ J A~ Q _ _ "J' ~r.' r-) ~ ~ • p ~S ~ ~ y ~ r. ~+ s.~ ~ r~ r .~.~ * ~ ~ ~ , O r r ~ ~ A t"1 UQ aq .. .~ r " ~ .~.. fl.. CD V1 .fl V.~-( J ~ Sy ~ rY <.0~ O (~ ~ ~ ~ ^'S ~ ~ 6 ~~ O ' O (D . ' ~ .., O , ~ ~ ,;, r ~ ~ ~ O n r • ~ s., ~ ~ O '..J . . y ~ 0 -p -_e C . t-7i ,.J ~ A~ O r _. ~ ~ fD O.. O ~~ O O . ~ ~. O. ~ ~ ._- UQ O ~ (D ~ ~ O (D . ~ `~ C ` ~ O P'' N (D (D ~ UU ~ ~ " ~ A~ .~ ~ f2. O O ~ ?J cD ~ '' ~ O ~. O ~ '~ ~p (~ ~ rZ~ ~ rY ~_ ~YJ Q-. V ~y n l O C~ O J L.. ~ O W r' - _, ~ ~ _ fl.. O m~• .. J 0. p n~ A~ O ~~ ~~ O Q r-f .' j" ~ A~ O.. . O ~ '_ ~ ~ //yy~~~ . .. _. • ^ f ¢ ~ ~ V4 /y ~ hn I ~ QG CD //yyC~ VV ^~ 1 O ~-~ n 1't)WNSt1/P t~F DRCI-MEDONTE REPtaRT Report No. FC?-2008-03 To: Committee of the Whole Prepared By: S. Cowden, Director Meeting Cate: April 16 200$ Subject: Motion # Re t A por on ctivities, Roll #: February, 2008 R.M.S. File #: RECC}MMENCATION{S}: Requires Actian~ For Information Only X It is recommended that: 1. This report be received for information BACKGR4UNC: The analysis below and attachments comprise the report on our activities for the month of February, 2008. ANALYSIS; This has been another very busy month for everyone connected with the Fire and Emergency Services Department with anear-retard 62 Emergency Calls attended including three large residential fires. [See reports, attached] Some highlights for the month are described in the following paragraphs. February 10t~' dawned snowy, cold and windy, and by the time the sun finally rose, crews from Station No's 5 and 6 had been at work assisting Severn Twp. with a stubborn house fire in a remote part of their area. By 6 a.m. they had been working #or four hours and were just heading for home when the report of a fire at 27 Greengables turned into a fire that consumed the garage and a large part of the home. The first arriving crews from Stn. 2 were met by flames already through the garage roof, fanned by 60 kph winds. Crews from Station's 4, 1, 5 and 3 all pitched in to knock the fire down by approx. 8 a.m. While the house was severely damaged, the #amily was uninjured and much of their belongings were saved from the fire. Because of several factors, an Investigator from the C}ffice of the Fire Marshal was called by the author to FIRE ANC? EMERGENCY SERVICES C?EPARTMENT April 16 20x8 Report No. FD 20Ui3-G13 Page # of 3 assist with the determination of the cause of the fire. Two days of work located the area of the fires' origin, but were unable to positively determine the source. While this fire was still underway, the weather conditions made roads very dangerous with zero visibility occurring with little notice. Our staff braved the elements, extricating people from six different vehicle collisions around the Township. On February 13th, we again assisted Severn with a house fire on Townline rd started when embers escaped through an aged chimney into the attic. On February 15th The FPO and f attended a seminar entitled, "Walk the Talk, Zero Tolerance for Smoke Alarm Violations." Presented by the Office of the Fire Marshal, this seminar was acne-day intensive an handling those who still have failed to comply with Ontario's Fire Code and its' stance on the installation and maintenance of smoke alarms in residential buildings. On the 16t", embers escaping a chimney ignited combustibles in the attic area of 82 Line 3 South. Crews worked hard through deep snow on the ground and on the roof of the house to attack the fire 3 storeys above the ground. Crews from Stations 1, 2, 3 and 4 pitched in to put the fire under control in a little more than an hour. Much work was done to prevent damage to the contents of the home and tarps were placed over furniture, electronics and floors to minimize damage, Our initial estimate is $75,000. damage, The next day, Crews from Stn. 3 extinguished a small fire in the garage at 3 Beachwood. Improper disposal of ashes from the woodstove ignited combustible material in the garage, damaging the wall and items nearby. Quick response by the Dept. kept damage to approximately $5,000. On the 20th, we met with all Chief Officers for one of our regularly scheduled meetings to discuss plans for 2(108 for training, equipment and operational response. On February 24th, our Airboat responded to the report of a truck sinking through the ice on Lake Simcoe near Line 7. Responded to find an individual had driven his SUV across Lake Simcoe only to become stuck in slush near the shore. The driver was turned over to the OPP and the vehicle pushed out of the slush and handed off to a towing company called by Police. Lastly, on the 25th, Levitt Safety began our second annual SCBA recertification program. Mandated by Occupational Health and Safety, these tests ensure that our breathing apparatus are in good condition and will provide the required level of protection for our fire fighters. Testing of our 54 SCBA took the technician three days. Unlike last year where all but three units failed the tests, this year all our SCBA passed the safety testing with only a few needing minor adjustments. This program really helps ensure we're protecting our fire fighters when they're out protecting the community. FINANCIAL: none FIRE AND EMERGENCY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Report Na, FD 2008-03 Aprll 16 200$ Page 2 of 3 ~A PQ[.ICIESII.EGlSl.ATIQN: Wane GONSULTATIQNS. N/A ATTACHMENTS. 1. Monthly incidents, February 2008 2. Ac#ivity report, February 2{748 3. Incident Count by Fire Station 2008 YTD CONCL.USi10N: Re~ectful submi~tted~f~ t ~ ~, ,.- ~-~- 'r - ;~ '~~ - ''.~~,~ ~~ ~;;,~ `'°~--~ Scott P. Bowden .~ Director _. SMT Agpr©val i Comments' C.A.Q. Aperoval / Comments• ~-i~c n,vu crv~~rtu~~vt,T SttiVI4ES DEPARTMENT _ Apri# 16 2008 Report No. FD 2008-03 Page 3 0# 3 Monthly ltlCidents nro-Medonte Fire t7epartment ~©ae aov7 rear Month ~ai/s YTD _ Assfsr Cans YTL7 _ 2{108 2 82 i 22 57 53 i 02 Response Type Calls Last Yr 01 -Fire 4 3 21 -Overheat 2 31 -Alarm Equipment -Malfunction 2 t 32 -Alarm Equipment -Accidental 3 2 34 -Human -Perceived Emergency i 5Q -Paver Lines Dawn, Arcing 1 52 - Carbon Monoxide Alarm 5 ~ 61 - Vehicte Extrication 5 62 • Vehicle Accident 15 25 68 • Water Ice Rescue 2 71 • Asphyxia, Respiratory Condition 5 i 73 -Epileptic, Diabetic Seizure t 76 -Heart Attack, CPR 2 3 80 -Cuts, Abrasions 3 81 -Fracture 2 83 -Person Fainted, Nausea 2 89 -Other MedicaUResuscitator Call 2 9i -Assistance fo Other Flre Department 3 t 93 -Assistance to Other Agencies i 94 -Other Public Service i 96 - Catl Cancelled an Route 5 4 97 -Incident No# Found t i'u~stl<:y ~pri+ ~; i ..~:r'; ti.~ii.~34 PM ` ., .. ri _--- '; ATTACHMENTS FQR SUBJECT: '' Monthly Activity Report FD Report far February 2008 PREPARED BY: Lynn Harness, F.D. Secretary Date Station Time Type Location 2008102J01 Horseshoe 20:13:33 Call Cancelled on Route 400 HY N, Horseshoe .. Va!(ey Rd . 2008102/01 Shanty Bay .8:16:17 . Vehicle Acciden# ____ 11 HY S, Line 2 South __~. 2008102102 _-__ . Warminster ~ _. _. 18:52:34 rv _ _ _ _ __~ ; Vehicle Accident _ _~-- _-_ i2 HY, Moonstone Rd 2008/02/02 _Horseshoe 18:02:56. ... _Alarm Equipment - 1756 INGRAM RD ', Malfunction 2008102102 Horseshoe 10:06:59 Heart Attack, CPR 1520 LINE 1 N 2008/02/03 Horseshoe ' 21;47:14 Cuts, Abrasions 1101 HORSESHOE ' VALLEY RQ 2008102/03 __ Horseshoe ,_ 21:19:05 Cuts, Abrasions 1101 HORSESHOE VALLEY RD ' 2008/02104 Horseshoe 9:21:59 Person Fainted, Nausea _ ___ 90 HIGHLAND DR 200$/02107 Shanty Bay 11.20:34 . Vehicle Accident 11 HY S, Line 5 North _ -- 4 2008/02107 - -- .. ____- Horseshoe 18:52:42 Carbon Monoxide Alarm ' 4 FAIRWAY CT ,.-- __._ 2008/02107! ~ . _ Horseshoe 1 8:46:15 Heart Attack, CPR 00017 OAKMONT ___ .._ 20081021091 _.___. _ Moonstone _.1.__. _____ 8:17:29 ,Assistance #o Other Fire 1530 GERVAIS RD __.. . _ ' Department .2008102109- Rugby 10.45:07 Carbon Monoxide Alarm _. _ 8 SHELSWELL CR 2008/02/10` Warminster 14.58:40 i Vehicle Extrication 12 HY ...2008102/10 - --- Hawkestone -- ' 13:51:29 - Call Cancelled on Route ' -- -- _ -- 11 HY S, Line 15 North _,___w_ - 2008102(10 -_.~ ~.__ Hawkestone ~~._. - - 6.33.54 , -- . -- - -~-- Fire -[Detached Dwelling -__- --- - - . ~_ _ _- - - r 27 GREENGABLES DR .2008102/10 Horseshoe 9.56:36 Vehicle Extrication HORSESHOE VALLEY ' RD ,Line 3 North :2008/02110 Hawkestone 15:20:34 Vehicle Accident i 1 HY S, Line 11 North 2008102110 Shanty Bay 15;15:37 Vehicle Accident 11 HY S, __ Penetanguishene Road ' 2008f02/10 Hawkestone , 10:14:35 Vehicle Extrication 11 HY S, Line 13 South 2008102/10 Warminster 2:47:55 Assistance to Other Fre _ ____ . 1725 FAIRVIEW DR __. - C~gparlment f 2008/02/11 Hawkestone 8:49:30 Assistance to Other ~ _ __ - 27 GREENGABLES DR Agencies Damage $150,000.00 ~100.ooo.ao date Station ~ Tirne TYpe 2008/Ct2111 Hawkestone 15:55:48 Vehicle Accident _. 2g081C12f11 ' _ Horseshoe _ ~ 5:12:16 Carbon Monoxide Alarm 2 0 0810211 1 ° __ Horseshoe __, 15:44:09 Alarm .Equipment - _ __ __-_ _ _ _ Accidental '2408102(12 Moonstone 7:09:39 _. Vehicle Accident - 2008102/12 Shanty Bay 12.09:03 Alarm Equipment - _ . ' .._ _._ Malfunction 2008J02/12 Hawkestone , 15:36:49 ,.___ , Asphyxia, respiratory..... j Condition 2008102113 Horseshoe :13:31...:26 : Asphyxia, respiratory ~ -- ~ -~.. _ _ ~ Condition 2008!02/13. Moonstone 0:44:54 _ Asphyxia, respiratory -- _ -- - ~ condition 2008/02113 Shanty Bay -- 14;00;25 ( ----- Vehicle Accident _ 2008/02113; -- Warminster ~ 14.02:52 _ __ ;Assistance to Other Fire -- ----- - - _ ___ . _T ..._~_ De~artmeni 2008102115 Moonstone j 10:10;38 __.-Vehicle Accident _-._-- 2008/02/15 Horseshoe 14:35;26 --- _..-- Vehicle Accident - __. _ 2008102;15' _ _. Hawkestone 15:22:06 ' Water Ice Rescue 008102116 Horseshoe 13:31:55 Person Fainted, Nausea 2008I02C16 , Shanty Bay 18:33:28 - __ __.-- _-- incident Not Found ' .2008102116. Shanty Bay 18.0$:48 Fire -Detached Dwelling:. __ 2008J02/19 Horseshoe 8: i 6:47 ~ _.._---._-.. ____ _ ;. Fire -Detached Dwelling _._W .___ __-.. __ 2008102/20 __ Horseshoe _ 20:49:49 ~ _ _ ' -- Vehicle Accident ~2008i02t21 , Warminster __ 9.49:51 ~ _ _ Asphyxia, Respiratory ~_ ___ __-_-- _. ~ _.__-_ _ --- ~! -- Gond~tion 2008f02J21 Shanty Bay _ 15:23:03 _ __ Alarm Equipment - _u_ _ ~ _ Accidental 2008/02!21' Moonstone __ 11:49:41 _. Guts, Abrasions '2 2008/02/23 Shanty Bay 14:14:02 ©ther Public Service 2008/02!23 _Rugby_ _ 1:12:00 _ _.-. Vehicle Accident -- - _ 2008J02123 _. _ __ Horseshoe -__. 2.31:38 __. _. Alarm Equipment - _ --- -- _.-_ __ Accidental 2008/02123 Shanty Bay __ . . __ _ 17:32:15 Asphyxia, ..respiratory Condition } i,ocation 11 HY N Line 9 North 42 MAPLEGREST GT .,i _90 HIGHLAND DR _ 400 HY S, Horseshoe Valley Rd__ . _. 63 SPENCER TL __ --- _ __ 27 LAKESHC}rE RD E 1101 H©RSESHC)E VALi,.EY RD __ ,_ _ 19 VALLEYVIEW DR 11 HY S, Line 2 South ___.. 21$1 TQWN Ll _ __ __.. 400 HY S, Mt. St. Louis Road _. _ __ --- - OLD BArrIE rD W, Line 4 North __ - --~__ 905 Wt7C?DLAND DR --- - - _ i 101 HCJRSESH(JE _,_ -_. _._ VALLEY RD 29 GUWAN rD __ _.. ----- - ---- 82LINE3S--- 3 BEECHWO©D rD HC?RSESHOE VALLEY __RD ,Line 1 North 02448 TC3WNUNE 57 BARRIE Tr--- __._ _ _ 4 MOUNT SAINT L~U15 , rD .224 LINE 7 N _ _. ____ ___ _. LINE 13 N __.-_-- 90HIGHLAND DR _ . ..- (}1555 HIGHWAY 11 ©amage $75,000.00 L ?OOs000.00 S $5,00(?AO L Date Station ...... lime Type ~.ocation Damage 2448/42124 Shanty Ray 24:49:38 _ _ Water Ice Rescue __ - 44266 LAKESHORE 2448142/25' . _ _ Horseshoe _ _ ___. _ __.. _____ . 14:27:41 Call Cancelfed an Route HORSESHOE VALLEY _. __. 2448/42i~6 _. Horseshoe RD ,Line 1 North ~ 13:58;41 Fracture.. _ ., 1141 HORSESHOE . _ . _ .2448!42126 __ ___.__ Hawkestane VALLEY RC} __ _ ,..23:22:43 ' Fire -Other Vehicfe _._t RtC7GE RCS E, Line 12 ~5 044.44 I __ 2448/42126 ___ _ . Shanty Bay _- South ~O.t}0_; ..14:53:42 Carbon Monoxide Alarm 17 WALNUT C?R ' 2448142127 ~ Shanty Bay --- = 11.49:55 Vehicle Accident WiNDFfELD DR E, Line ~ .C _ _ 2448142127 ~ __ , __ Shanty Ray ;. South _.__ ___ 629 __. _ ___ i 3:42:27 Vehicle Accident _ ~- -- __ _ _ ~_ 2448142129... ___. _ ..__ . _ Horseshoe _ ~_ ____-.. _____ .___._.___. F'ENETANGUiSHENE RC7 -~- _ 14.44:41 Cail CanceAed an Haute 444 HY N, Line 4 North '-- _---__ 2448142129 _-___ ___- Ruby __~ j ,- 1:44:48 . Cafi Canceffed an Route 44444 RENSLEY C1R :2448/42129! Shanty Bay __ ._ _ _ _ ' 2:48:46 Human - f~erceived _~ _ - -- f~ENETANGUISHENE .___ _____.., 2448/42129 ____ ____ Horseshoe ;- __._Emerc~ency _` --- Rf4, Highwa~ll ' 22:53:25-~ Fracture 1141 HORSESHOE _ _._._ ___.______ _._--_. __ _ 2448142/29 _._ -- Horseshoe __--- _YALLEY RD 18:46:24 Vehicle Accident HORSESHOE VALLEY] 4 _ _ __ _ y 2448142129 __. _ _... Shanty Bay _ RD , Horseshoe Vaffey Rd ,._ } -___ -- - 16.49:54. _ Vehicle Extrication ~ LfNE 3 N, Highway 11 2448/42129 Horseshoe --- - -- , ' 18:54:14 Vehicle Extrication ' HORSESHOE VALLEY __ ._. '_---_____.-- ~ 2448142/29 ___ Warminster l_ ~ ___RD Line 3 North ' 8:44:56 Carbon Monoxide Alarm 5164 LIME 11 N i Structure and Vehicle Fire Dollar Value host Dollar Value Saved ~2ss,ooo.ao ~4s4,4o4.44 lVledical Calls zoos zoo? 14 7 //1Cl t~G'Ct 1' ~t7~UtI f Period: 2008/01 Area lncidenfs Cancelled Total 01 g _ _ ~ 15 Q2 15 03 ~~ ~~ ' Q4 g ,_ 9 45 12 12 O6 ~ ~ ,i Totals: so _ ~~ Period: 2008102 Area Incidents Cancelled Tofat of ~~ _ 1s a2 ~ -_ ~ Q3 23 _ 23 Q4 3 _ 3 05 ~ ~ 06 ~ ~ ratal~: 62 ... _...._... ~~ . 21708 Totals: 122 122 Grand Tatais: 122 122 i Qro-Med©nte Fire [department TueSc~ay Rptia 1. ~ ; ; .'.5~. FB PR9 v.u4,;, Page ? et