The URL can be used to link to this page

01 16 2008 COW AgendaTOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING AGENDA COUNCIL CHAMBERS DATE: WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 16, 2008 TIME: 9:00 a.m. 1. NOTICE OF ADDITIONS TO AGENDA 2. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA 3. DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST AND THE GENERAL NATURE THEREOF: - "IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ACT" 4. DEPUTATIONS: None. 5. CONSENT AGENDA: a) Michael Drumm, Airport Manager, Lake Simcoe Regional Airport, correspondence dated December 30, 2007 re: Lake Simcoe Regional Airport Semi-Annual Report. Staff Recommendation: Receipt. b) Ed Whinnery, Staff Sergeant, Detachment Commander, Barrie OPP Detachment, correspondence dated January 7, 2008 re: Year - 2008 Estimated Nan-Contract OPP Policing Costs. Staff Recommendation: Receipt and Refer to 2008 Budget Deliberations. c) Dennis Roughley, Chair, Board of Health, Simcoe Muskoka District Health Unit, correspondence dated December 18, 2007 re: Report, "The Impact of the Built Environment on the Health of the Population" [additional information available in the Clerk's Office]. Staff Recommendation: Receipt. d) Carol Trainor, Clerk/Deputy Treasurer, correspondence dated December 6, 2007 re: Duplication of Planning Services; Wayne Wilson, CAOISecretary-Treasurer, Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority, correspondence dated December 13, 2007 re: Township of Essa Resolution Regarding Duplication of Planning Services. Staff Recommendation: Receipt. 6. COMMUNICATIONS: a) Lisa Guthrie, Supervisor, Safe Drinking Water Branch, Barrie District Office, Ministry of the Environment, correspondence dated January 7, 2008 re: Notice of Release of the 2006-07 Inspection Rating Record [additional information available in the Clerk's Office]. b) Uli Surmann, clo Horseshoe Valley Property Owner's Association, correspondence dated January 6, 2008 re: Resort -Style of Housing for Future HV Developments. e} Uli Surmann, clo Horseshoe Valley Property Qwner's Association, correspondence dated January 7, 2008 re: Speed Limit on C}Id Barrie Road at W.R. Best School. d) Marion Koepke, City Clerk, City of Gwen Sound, correspondence received December 14, 2007 re: Motion, One Gent Now Campaign. 7. REPORTS OF MEMBERS OF COUNCIL: None. 8. FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION: a} Report No. TR 2008-01, Paul Gravelle, Treasurer, re: Statement of Accounts - December, 2007. b) Report No. TR 2008-02, Paul Gravelle, Treasurer, re: Report on Tax Arrears. c) Report No. TR 2008-03, Paul Gravelle, Treasurer, re: Statement of Investment Activities. 9. PUBLIC WORKS: None. 10. ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL. SERVICES: a) Report No. EES 2008-01, Keith Mathieson, Director of Engineering and Environmental Services re: Arbourwood Development (Phase II) -Issuance of Certificate of Substantial Completion and Acceptance (Aboveground Works). b) Report No. EES 2008-02, Keith Mathieson, Director of Engineering and Environmental Services re: Arbourwood Development (Phase III) -Issuance of Certificate of Substantial Completion and Acceptance (Aboveground Works). c) Report No. EES 2008-03, Keith Mathieson, Director of Engineering and Environmental Services re: Sugarbush (Phase 111, Stage IV -Section "C") -Issuance of Certificate of Substantial Completion and Acceptance (Aboveground Works). d) Report No. EES 2008-04, Keith Mathieson, Director of Engineering and Environmental Services re: Sugarbush (Phase III, Stage IV -Section "C") -Issuance of Certificate of Maintenance and Final Acceptance (Underground Works). 2 11. BUILDING, PANNING AND BY-LAW ENFORCEMENT: a) Report No. BP 2008-41, Bruce Hoppe, Director of Building and Planning Services, re: Zoning By-law Amendment 2008-ZBA-01 (Neil McNiven), Con 8, N. Pt. of Lot 3, 2943 Line 7 North, Township of Oro-Medonte. 12. EMERGENCY SERVICES: None. 13. RECREATION AND COMMUNITY SERVICES: a) Shawn Binns, Manager of Recreation and Community Services, re: Ravines of Medonte Update. 14. IN-CAMERA: a) Robin Dunn, Ghief Administrative Officer, re: Personnel Matter (Compensation and Performance Management). 15. QUESTIONS FROM THE PUBLIC CLARIFYING AN AGENDA ITEM 16. ANNOUNCEMENTS 17. ADJOURNMENT 3 .~ _ k ADDENDUM COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING Wednesday, January 16, 2008 6. COMMUNICATIONS: e) Danny Epstein, Regional Director, Environmental Protection Operations Division (Ontario), Environment Canada, correspondence dated January 14, 2448 re: Letter of Agreement - KW445-04-4545, Severn Sound Environmental Association. ~a~CeSi~co~ Regional/kirport December 30, 2007 Mayor, Council, City Administrator and Treasurer Corporation of the City of Barrie 70 Collier Street PO Box 400 Barrie, Ontario L4M 4T5 Mayor, Council, City Manager and Treasurer Corporation of the Gity of Orillia 50 Andrew Street South Orillia, Ontario L3V 7T5 Mayor, Council, CAO and Treasurer Corporation of the Township of Ora-Medonte PO Bax 100 Ora, Ontario LOL 2xa Members of Council, City Administrators and Treasurers: RE: Lake Simcoe Regional Airport Semi-Annual Report _"~ phone 705.487.0999 raX 705.4$7.1411 224 Line 7 North, RR#2 Oro Station, Ontario LOL 2E0 ~ANADa Further to Clause 4 of the Accountability Policy for Municipal Agencies, the Lake Simcoe Regional Airport has prepared a review of the past years' activities, for your perusal At the February 2008 Commission meeting, a final review of 2007 financials and approval of the 2008 Airport Budget will be completed and the necessary request(s) will be submitted to Councils. The following notes relate to the report. a} The Airport Commission is anticipating concluding fiscal 2007 with an estimated operating surplus of $20,000.00. The commission has further submitted a preliminary 2008 total budget increase of 3.9% compared to 2007 levels. b) The airport is pleased to confirm that the construction of a new 12,000 sq. ft. dedicated facility far Hydra One Helicopter Services has begun. The facility has an anticipated completion date of spring 2008 and will house the provincial headquarters of Nydro One's helicopter operations. The airport wilt also soon be home to the new traffic services aircraft of the Ontario Provincial Police. The highly publicized program geared to reduce traffic speeding and dangerous driving will see a permanent base of operations and police staff at the Lake Simcoe Regional Airport. c) Throughout the past three years, the Lake Simcoe Regional Airport Commission has tirelessly reviewed various design solutions and scenarios to resolve the mandatory and code compliant requirement for fire suppression. www.lakesimcoeairport.com During the April 19, 2407 Lake Simcoe Regional Airport Commission meeting, and after consulting with the Township of Oro-Medonte Building and Fire Department afFicials, a final engineering design solution for the above referenced topic was reviewed and discussed at great lengths. In consideration of the mandatory code requirement for this system, the Commission ratified a motion for staff to proceed with the tender process. Concurrently, it was requested of the City of Barrie to provide an infrastructure loan far the costs associated with the mandatory requirement, of which unanimous support was received. The project is proceeding on schedule and is anticipated to be completed by spring 2008. This system will enable continued commercial developments at the airport while providing vital life protection services. d) The Lake Simcoe Regional Airport Commission is pleased to have had the opportunity to present the confidential document "Building a Business Case far DevelaprrtenY' to the member municipalities in the first half of fiscal 2446. The received support from the municipalities and formal endorsement of this document is pivotal in advancing the airport's Capita! works program and in attracting further commercial and industrial based tenants to the Lake Simcae Regional Airpart, ultimately creating a fledging aerospace industry business park environment. To that end, negotiations with various potential commercial opportunities are current and actively ongoing. e) Farming part of a strategic priority, the airport's branding and corporate and logo was redesigned in the first for of fiscal 2007. In addition to a new corporate image, the airport also undertook to completely redesign and launch a new Website - www.lakesimcoeairport.com. f} The Lake Simcoe Regional Airport was pleased to learn that once again, it will partner with Canadian Forces Base Borden and be the staging base of operations for their planned 2008 Armed Forces day and Airshow event. The airport will be the main staging ground for various airshow acts of which will include at a minimum, the wand renowned Canadian Snowbirds as well as the CF-1$ Hornet demonstration team. In consideration of a larger scale air show portion, the airport is already in the planning stages. The airport's relationship with the Department of National Defence and Canadian Forces Base Borden continues to strengthen. Ta that end and in addition to the numerous militaryJsearch and rescue flights throughout the year, the airport was proud to be one of the first civilian facilities in Canada to be visited by one of Canada's new strategic airlift aircraft -the C- 117 Globemaster quad jet. The foregoing information is for your perusal. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at (745) 487-4999. Sincere) Lake rncoe egional Airpart 1 ~~~ Michael J. Drumm Airport Manager cc Lake Simcoe Regional Airport Commission __.. ~•.- www.lakesimcoeairport.com LakeSi~cae Regional/kirport November 16, 2007 Ms Sharyn Ross, City Treasurer Carporation of the City of Barrie 70 Collier Street, PO Box 400 Barrie, Ontario L4M 4T5 Mr. Robert Ripley, Gity Treasurer Corporation of the City of Orillia 50 Andrew Street South Orillia, Ontario L3V 7T5 Mr. Paul Gravelle, Township Treasurer Carporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte PO Box 100 ©ro, Ontario LOL 2X0 phone 705.487.0999 fax 705.487.1411 224 Line 7 North, RR#2 Ora Station, Ontario ~0~ 2E0 CANADA co~Y Dear Treasurers: Re: take Simcoe Regional Airport 2008 Airport Operating Budget Draft During the November 15, 2007 Lake Simcoe Regional Airport Commission meeting, a first draft of the 2008 Airport Operating Budget was presented. While the 2008 budget will not be finalized until the February 2008 Commission meeting, the overall Lake Simcoe Regional Airport 2008 budget is anticipated #o be $531,459.28, compared to the overall 2007 budget figure of $510,959.28. A final 2008 Airport Budget will be submitted to Council following a review of year-end figures at the February 2008 Commission meeting, in accordance with the Lake Simcoe Regional Airport Agreement. The foregoing information is provided for your consideration and initial budget deliberations. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate the undersigned at (705) 487-0999. Sincerely, take Simcoe Regional Airport Michael J. Drumm Airport Manager cc Lake Simcoe Regional Airport Commission ~~~\~'" wv~rw.lakeSimCOeairport.com t. ~t rs~? . ,. ;~~~~ Monday, January 07, 200!:3 Township of CI'rr~- ~i~~:lonte Nlnnicipal ToT~~rr°strip Office 7`~ Lure S ORO MEDC?l~"T~;, ~N L(IL 2E0 To: 1Vlrryor Hrrg~re.~ crud CAO ~u~rrr ~~, _.._. ~~ ~. gip. '~~ ~ ~- i` y ~~ Barrie Detachment Detachement de Barrie 20 Rose Street Barrie ON t_4M 2T2 20, rue Rose Barrie C7N L4M 2T2 let {705}726-6484 Fax:{705}726-6487 ~iie Reference: 400-04 RE: Year - 20D8 Es~titntrted ;!'€~rr-~`r~~rtruct ~}PF` Pr~lieirr~ Costs Tei.:{705}726-6484 Telec.: {705) 726-6487 Please find uttuehc~cl ~,~~ur 2~0 ` ,, ~li~:=in~ t~~~.~~t c~sti~~~ates f» tl:~ T~~~~nship of ©~o Medonte that including an infr~rrrrc~tion sheep ~~~rtlinin~ thc~ erzstfn~,; metl~adoh~,7y for the 2008 estimated costs. Ontario Shar°ed Sc-rviees cif the , ~inrs~tra}- c~f~ /~ i rr , - ~ ~c~ ~~~ill rnuil the ?008 estimates to non-contract munici~~alities b~~ the end of./<<, ~ ~,;r ~ ?00~~'. ,11at~1rc°ipcrlitie.s~ ii~ill ofrlt=receive their total estimated OPP cost and ~~%ill ::ot rec•elve ~- ~ ~ ."~ F, rl:~~l irrf~~~°r~t~tior2 itemi~in~ individual costs. These documents c~rc ~r- :~-'r~r? to core ~~~,~,~ ~t .~;,,_~ 1 ~rr~f~, the docun~~ents supplied h1~ Ontario Shared Servicerofthe~Li~~ stry~nfh'inunc,~. Please feel free to eor?tact me rxt thedet~rchfjzent regarding at~y Of the infor°mation included in this packa~;Te Sincere/y. Ed Whinner ~ #~ ~ C~ ~ •u ~., ~~', ,~ , .3 !~ -~ -.~ Staff Sergeant Detaehrrrent Cara~~rrrxrrrler ~~ Barrie OPP detcrch~~rent ;;; ,.-- ~`~f ~C1~~C'IO Government of Ontario Gouvernement de ('Ontario 2008 ESTIMATES LICING S Details of the cast allocation methodology are set out in Regulation 42019'7 pursuant to the Pollee Seri=ices Act. The estimated number of afficers and civilian members providing field services are used to prepare the 2008 estimates. The number of afficers and civilians in each detachment is based on approved funding. The approved casting formula was revised in 2004 to update the various cast components in it to reflect more up-to-date OPP casts. The 2008 estimates are obtained using the number of officers and civilian personnel in each detachment and include the municipal portion of the services provided by the OPP (excluding provincial responsibilities such as traffic patrol on King's Highways, waterways policing, policing in provincial parks and unincorporated areas}. Individual municipal estimates for 2008 are determined by apportioning the detachment cast attributable to municipal policing provided to each municipality based an its proportion of the detachment workload. The negotiated 2008 salaries have been used to complete this estimate for uniform and civilian members. The estimates include: ^ direct costs (e.g., salaries, wages and benefits of uniform and civilian members); ^ equipment costs (e.g., vehicles, uniforms, supplies, radio equipment, computers}; ^ additional support personnel (e.g., communication operators and prisoner guards); and. ^ administrative support casts of the Regional and General Headquarters required to provide municipal services (e.g., Contract Policing, Recruiting and Quality Assurance}. The estimates exclude: ^ cost of provincial responsibilities such as traffic patrol an King's Highways, waterways policing, policing m provincial parks, unincorporated areas, First Nations Territories, and municipalities providing their own policing services; and ^ mandated special services such as major criminal investigations and investigative support services. Provincial Services usage: estimates have been reduced by a 10% Provincial Services usage to compensate municipalities for the deployment of officers from the municipality to other areas in the province to respond to emergencies/disasterslmajor investigations or other occurrences deemed provincial responsibilities. The actual Provincial Services usage will be applied for the reconciliation to actual costs in 2008, with no minimum application. O.P.P. COSTING SUMMARY - TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE Estimated Policing Costs for the period -~ January 01, 2008 to December 31, 2008 ~, t„ "~ Salaries and Benefits ~ ~~ ~j Uniform Members Positions $ Inspector ............................ - - Staff Sergeant-Detachment Commander .... 0.50 54,380 Staff Sergeant ........................ - - Sergeant ............................. 2.01 179,375 Constables ........................... 13.07 1,036,932 Total Uniform Salaries 1,270,687 Overtime (Provincial Average) ............... .......... .......... 114,362 Contractual Payout (Vacation & Statutory Holidays) ........ .......... 32,474 Shift Premium ........................... ........... ......... 3,604 Benefits (23.5% of Salaries; 2% of Overtime) ... .......... .......... 300,899 Total Uniform Salaries & Benefits 1,722,026 Civilian Members Positions $ OAG 8 .............................. 2.01 97,184 OAG 6 .............................. - - Caretaker 2 .......................... - - Caretaker 1 .......................... - - Communication Operators ................ ......... 25,524 Prisoner Guards ... ..................... ......... 10,908 Total Civilian Salaries 133,616 Benefits (23.5% of Salaries) ................ ........... ......... 28,836 Total Civilian Salaries & Benefits 162,452 OSS Pay and Benefit Charge .......................................... . Total Salaries & Benefits 1,884,478 Other Direct Operating Expenses Operational Support ........................................... 10,113 RHQ Municipal Support ........................................ 21,706 Vehicle Usage ............................................... 114,687 Telephone .................................................. - Office Supplies ............................................... 4,316 Accommodation .............................................. - Uniform & Equipment .......................................... 11,469 Furniture & Equipment ........................................ - Cleaning Contract ............................................ - Mobile Radio Equipment Maintenance ............................ 8,898 Office Automation -Uniform ..................................... 29,685 Office Automation -Civilian ..................................... 2,662 Tota/ Other Direct Operating Expenses 203,535 OSS ODOE Fee 2,341 2008 Total Estimated Gross Policing Cost ........................ ....... 2,090,354 Provincial Services Usage .................................... .........: (209,035) TOTAL ESTIMATED POLICING COST $ 1,881,319 FTE =Full Time Equivalent. Your municipality's portion of the total detachment cost is equivalent to the FTE shown which is based on your municipality's proportion of the detachment's workload. December 18, 2007 Township of Oro-Medonte Council c1o Ms. Paul Gravelle, Acting CAO, Township of Oro-Medonte 148 Line 7 South P O Box 100 Ora, ON ~0~ 2X0 Dear Ms. Gravelle and Council Members: Simcoe Muskoka District Health Unit (SMDHU) has worked in partnership with municipalities and other partner agencies to promote the development of health promoting features in the built environment. Most recently staff at the health unit researched and wrote the attached report entitled: The impact of fhe Built Environment on the Health of the Population: A Review of the Review Literature. This report provides a comprehensive overview of the findings of research on and the recommendations far community design to promote population health. It is the intention of the Board of Health for SMDHU that through the provision of recommendations on community design, based on the findings of research, there will be a lasting positive impact on health in our communities. It is also hoped that by broadly sharing our report we will assist in the building of healthy communities throughout the province and beyond, and that these recommendations be helpful to municipalities as they develop their own growth plans. To this end, the report is being provided to all boards of health in Ontario, the Association of Local Public Health Agencies, the Ontario Public Health Association, the Acting Chief Medical Officer of Health, the provincial Ministers of Health, Health Promotion, Transportation, Environment, Children and Youth Services, Community and Social Services, Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, Natural Resources, Public Infrastructure Renewal, Municipal Affairs and Housing, and within the Gounty of Simcoe, the cities of Barrie and Oriliia and the District of Muskoka to the Members of Parliament, Members of Provincial Parliament and the municipal councils. Please also feel free to visit our website to access an electronic version of the report. You can find it linked to the fallowing webpage: http:!/www.simcoemuskokahealth.org/Topics/environment/communitieslcommunities.asp If you have any questions or comments about the report please contact Megan Williams or Myrna Wright as the authors at the contact numbers listed on the front of the report. Yours sincerely, ,, ~~ °~--' i Dennis Roughley Chair, Board of Health >. 12f10/2007 10:03 7054242367 ESSA PAGE 02/02 Corporation of the Township of Essa 5786 Count' Road 21 Utopia, Ch,tario LOM 1 TO 5~-- Telephone: (705) 42d-9770 Fax: (705) d24-2367 Web Site: www.essatownship.or,.co Where Town aad Country Meec 6 December 2007 All Simcoe County Municipalities and NVCA Watersb~ed Municipalities Dear NVCA Members: Re: Duplication of Ptanwuag Services At its meeting of 5 December 2007, The Council of The Township of Essa passed the following resolution and seek your support: WHEREAS there is a significant duplication of planning and engineering services between the upper tier County of Simcoe and local Conservation Authorities; and WHEREAS the lower tier Township of Essa is also legislated to provide planning services to its property owners in accordance with its own Official Plan and the County of Simcoe Official Plan; and WHEREAS residents and ratepayers of all lower tier municipalities are required to go to extreme measures, both financially and through due process, to receive approval for building or construction projects, regardless of their size; NOW T,I~E'REFORE BE TT RESOLVED THAT The Township of Essa seeks the support of the municipalities within the County of Simcoe to streamline the planning and engineering duties currently undertaken by the conservation authority to avoid duplication; and TK4T the planning and engineering duties of the Conservation ,fluthority be streamlined to avoid duplication with the County of Simcoe; and further THAT the local Conservation Authorities continue to focus their responsibilities on vital environmental issues such as groundwater monitoring, watersheds, restoration, reforestation, wildlife and habitat conservation if you require any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Xours truly, ~~ Carol O. Trainor, A.M.C.T. Clerk /Deputy Treasurer CT/kp cc: Hon. HelenaGuagis, MP Simcoe-Grey Hon. Jim Wilson, MPP Simcoe-Grey Hon. Donna C~sficld, Minister ofNazurel Resources 9 a << ~~ n ~' ~q TION P~ Member Municipalities Adjala-Tosorontio Amaranth Bar~~e Tt~e Blue Mountains Bradford-West Gwiflfmbury Clearview December 13, 2007 Mayor Hughes & Council The Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte 148 Line 7 South Oro, Ontario LOL 2X0 Dear Mayor Hughes & Council: ~~ ~~.. RE~EIi/ED DEC 1 9 1007 ORO-MEDONTE TOWNSHIP Re: Township of Essa Resolution Regardina Duplication of Planning Services This letter is in response to a resolution passed by the Township of Essa on December 5, 2007, as follows: WHEREAS there is a significant duplication of planning and engineering services between the upper tier County of Simcoe and local Conservation Authorities; and cou~Rgw~°od WHEREAS the lower tier Township of Essa is also legislated to provide E`s,~ planning services to its property owners in accordance with its own Official ~nni~ru Plan and the County of Simcoe Official Plan; and Melancthon WHEREAS residents and ratepayers of all lower tier municipalities are M°~° required to go to extreme measures, both financially and through due process, M~'""" to receive approval for building or construction projects, regardless of their NPW 1F~~mseth size; CJraMedor,fe NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT The Townshi of Essa seeks Grey Highlands p the support of the municipalities within the County of Simcoe to streamline the sneibur~e planning and engineering duties currently undertaken by the conservation sp~fngwater authority to avoid duplication; and Wasaga E3each THAT the planning and engineering duties of the Conservation Authority be streamlined to avoid duplication with the County of Simcoe; and further Watershed Counties THAT the local Conservation Authorities continue to focus their responsibilities Simcoe on vital environmental issues such as groundwater monitoring, watersheds, o~ffef1n restoration, reforestation, wildlife and habitat conservation. Grey Member of ~~~ Conserving ~t~r f/ealfhv Waters NOTTAWASAGA VALLEY CONSERVATION AUTHORITY v Centre for Conservation Conservation John Hix Conservation Administration Centre ~ Tiffin Conservation Area 8195 8th Line Utopia, On LOM 1T0 ONTAaRI(7 Telephone: 705.424.1479 Fax: 705.424.2115 ~ Web: www.nvca.on.ca ~~ Email: adminCnvca.on.ca Township of Essa Resolution Regarding Duplication of Planning Services Page 2 of 3 It is important, when issues are raised that we meet to discuss and resolve any concerns. In that regard, I have spoken with Mayor David Guergis of the Township of Essa and have taken steps to set up a meeting with the CAO and Planning staff from the County of Simcoe and staff of the Township of Essa and the Authority, to address the concerns raised by the Township of Essa's resolution. In our goal of working together to value, protect, enhance, and restore our watershed resources, far a healthy sustainable future, Authority staff work in partnership with our municipalities and agencies in providing expertise in the fields of environmental planning, ecology and water resource engineering on a watershed wide basis. I would like to provide Council with a brief overview of how Conservation Authorities in general and the NVCA participate in the land use planning and development process: ^ Under the Conservation Authorities Act, Authorities are mandated to establish and undertake programs designed to further the conservation, restoration, development and management of natural resources within their watershed area. ^ Under Section 28 of the Conservation Authorities Act, the NVCA has developed a Generic Regulation that regulates certain activities in and adjacent to watercourses (including valley lands), wetlands, shorelines or inland lakes and other hazardous lands. • The Planning Act provides for the issuance of policy statements on matters of provincial interest (Provincial Policy Statement (PPS)). In April 1995, Conservation Authorities were delegated natural hazard responsibilities by the Minister of Natural Resources, including flood plain management, hazardous slopes, Great Lakes shorelines, unstable soils and erosion. These are now encompassed by Section 3.1 "Natural Hazards" of the PPS, and The P/anning Act requires that Conservation Authorities be notified of policy documents and applications for their review and comment. In April 2001, a Memorandum of Understanding was signed between Conservation Authorities, the Ministry of Natural Resources and Municipal Affairs and Housing confirming the aforementioned delegated responsibilities, and defining the specific roles of the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, the Ministry of Natural Resources and Conservation Authorities in ensuring planning policy documents and applications are consistent with the hazard land policies of the PPS. The NVCA has an existing formal agreement with The County of Simcoe to provide comments and technical support on natural heritage planning issues as well as those relating to natural hazards. Township of Essa Resolution Regarding Duplication of Planning Services Page 3 of 3 The existing official plan policies of many of the NVCA's member municipalities require the Authority to be actively involved in the identification of natural heritage features, including wetlands, forests and the review of Environmental Impact Statements. The NVCA has entered into an agreement with the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) to review plans to prevent harmful alteration, disruption or destruction of fish habitat under the Federal Fisheries Act. We acknowledge that numerous agencies are involved in the review of planning applications and the studies submitted in support of these applications. The Authority has developed good working relationships with these agencies, and we all work closely to focus on our own area(s) of responsibility and expertise, and to not duplicate efforts. It is important to note that the Province is currently undertaking a review of policies and procedures for Conservation Authority plan review and permitting activities. This review should be available in the new year and will assist with our streamlining efforts. We look forward to continuing to work together with all 18 of our watershed municipalities and 3 local counties in continuing to provide effective and timely planning and engineering review to ensure healthy and sustainable watershed values. I would be pleased to meet with you and you're Council to discuss this and any matters of mutual concern. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you require further information. Yours truly, Wayne R. Wilson, B.Sc. CAO/Secretary Treasury c: D. Gayle Wood, CAO Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority Mark Aitken, CAO County of Simcoe Hon. Helena Guergis, MP Simcoe-Grey Hon. Jim Wilson, MPP Simcoe-Grey Hon. Donna Cansfield, Minster of Natural Resources Ministry of the Environment Safe Drinking Water Branch Barrie District Office Unit 1201 54 Cedar Pointe Drive Barrie ON L4N 5R7 January 7, ?{)Q$ Municipality of Ora-Medante l48 Line 7 South Ora, ON LOL 2X0 Ministers de I'Envirannement Direction du controls de la quaiite de I'eau potable Bureau du district de Barrie Bureau 1201 54, chemin Cedar Paiute Barrie (C7ntario} ~4N 5R7 Attention: Mr. Keith Mathieson Director of En ineering Dear Mr. Mathiesan: Re: Native of Release of the 2006-07 Inspection Rating Record **~~- fI,~"'' '` "" "'' I/f 1 I i~. 1 ~ ~.J Please find attached your 2006-07 Inspection Rating Record (IRR) and methodology information sheet that are related to your 2006-07 Ministry Inspection Report. The Ministry is now in the process of developing a business process whereby system owners and operating authorities will receive their individual Inspection II2R with their annual Ministry Inspection Report. We are therefore including the 2007-08 IRR far any inspections that have already been completed this year. If you have not had an inspection Bane to date, you can expect to receive your IRR upon completion of your annual Inspection Report. Please call me if you have any questions regarding your IRR or the methodology. In addition, please share the enclosed information with municipal council. Yours truly, .~ ~;r Lisa Guthrie Supervisor (A) Safe Drinking Water Branch Barrie District Office Phone: (705)'739-6385 LG/ja Attachments bc: File SI-SI-OM General Correspondence, Oro-Medonte Municipal Well Supplies Ontario Ministry of the Environment APPLICATION OF THE METHOD4L4GY USEQ FflR MEASURING INSPECTIC?N RESULTS The Ministry of the Environment (MOE) has a rigorous and comprehensive inspection program for municipal residential drinking water systems (MRDWS). Its objective is to determine the compliance of municipal residential drinking water systems with requirements under the Safe Drinkrng Water Act, 2002, associated regulations and MOE Certificates of Approval (CofAs). It is the responsibility of the municipal residential drinking water system owner to ensure their drinking water systems are in compliance with all applicable legal requirements. This document describes the methodology for measuring inspection results that will be applied to the findings of the Ministry's MRDWS inspections. The primary goals of introducing this type of assessment are to encourage ongoing improvement of these systems and to establish a way to measure their improvements. The Ministry's Municipal Residential Drinking Water Inspection Protocol contains up to 14 inspection modules and consists of up to 130 regulatory questions. Those protocol questions are also linked to definitive guidance that Ministry inspectors use when conducting MRDWS inspections. The questions address a wide range of regulatory issues, from administrative procedures to drinking water quality monitoring. Additionally, the inspection protocol contains many other non-regulatory questions. A team of drinking water specialists in the Ministry have assessed each of the inspection protocol re ulq_atory_ questions to determine the consequence of having a response in the negative (i.e. not complying with the regulatory framework) that would compromise the delivery of safe drinking water. This assessment was based on established provincial risk assessment principles, with each question receiving an assigned consequence value. Based on the number of areas where a system is deemed to be non-compliant during the inspection, and the significance of these areas to potential human health impacts, arisk-based inspection rating is calculated by the Ministry for each MRDWS. A low inspection rating would not necessarily mean that the drinking water provided by that system is unsafe; however, it does indicate the degree to which there is room for improvement in meeting the province's regulatory requirements. The inspection rating for a drinking water system will reflect the inspection results of the specific DWS for the reporting year. When the methodology is applied consistently over a period of years, it can serve as a comparative measure both provincially and in relation to the individual system. Each MRDWS and the public will be able to track its performance over time, which will encourage continuous improvement and allow systems to identify specific areas requiring attention. - This methodology for assessing inspection findings will be Tared as a tool to track progress ~~..., S.OWarUS Irlt; l..rlteT urlnKl[i(J. YYctTet frt5i.,l~ClUl~S 4~Udt Vt dC.t uCVii i~ i vv -o Lvu iNna~ we vviiii~ a .c regulatory framework on aprovince-wide basis. December 21, 2007 Page 1 of 6 Qntario Ministry of the Environment Determining Potential to Compromise the Delivery of Safe Water As noted, each inspection protocol questian was assessed by MOE drinking water specialists to determine the potential to compromise the delivery of safe water using a risk management approach that is aligned with the Government of Ontario's Inspections, Investigations and Enforcement {II&E} Risk Management Framework which, in turn, is built on a universally accepted risk assessment method. Risk management is a systematic approach to identifying potential hazards; understanding the likelihood and consequences of the hazards; and taking steps to reduce their risk if necessary and as appropriate. The Government of Ontario mandated the II&E Secretariat to address the specific challenges of managing risk in the context of Ontario's regulatory environment and across a variety of ministry program areas. The work of the II&E Secretariat resulted in the development of the II&E Risk Management Framework which has subsequently been adopted as the definitive risk management taal in the Ontario Public Service. The II&E Risk Management Framework provides a formula to be used in the determination of risk: Risk =Likelihood of a hazard occurring x Consequence of a hazard that has occurred Every regulatory questian in the municipal residential inspection protocol will possess a "likelihood {L)" and an assigned "consequence (C)" value as described in Table 1. The likelihood value is based on the response to each inspection questian asked at an individual MRDWS inspection. Once an inspection has been completed for the reporting year, the frequency of non-compliance is known, and, can be described as either 0% (a "yes" response = compliance} or 100°I° (a "no" response =non-compliance). In other words, likelihood is a binary term described as either "no" (L=1 } ar "yes" (L=0). The consequence values (1 to 4} have been selected to align with other risk-based programs and projects currently under development within the Ministry. The consequence categories are descriptives which depict outcomes in a subjective manner. They are described at an absolute level of consequence versus a weighted consequence. For example a consequence value of 4 (major consequence of potential drinking-water health hazard) is not four times the health hazard/severe as a consequence value of 1 (slight consequence). Qecember 21, 2007 Page 2 of 6 Ontario Ministry of the Environment Likelihood Ratin Rating _ Response to regulatory question is 0 "Yes" com liant Response to regulatory question is 1 "No" non-com liant Table 1 Copse uence Ratite Rating ~ Slight consequence 1 Minor consequence other than a 2 drinking-water health hazard Moderate consequence of a potential drinking-water health 3 hazard Major consequence of a potential drinking-water health 4 hazard A risk value was then calculated for each regulatory-related question in the inspection protocol using the formula: Risk = Likelihood x Consequence. This risk value (question rating) quantifies the importance of non-compliance of each question relative to the others. Questions with higher values are those with a potentially more significant impact on drinking water safety and a higher likelihood of occurrence. The highest possible value would be 4 (1 x 4) and the lowest would be 0 (0 x 1). In Table 2, two examples show how the risk approach was applied to regulatory-related inspection questions to determine potential to compromise the delivery of safe water. Table 2 Inspection Question Likelihood Consequence Question Ratin 2 Do all operators possess the 0'` (minor consequence 0 x 2-0 required certification? other than a drinking water health hazard) Are all required microbiological ** 4 (major consequence of 1 x 4=4 water quality monitoring 1 a potential drinking water requirements being met? health hazard) 0* = a "yes" or an "N/A" answer 1 ** = a "no" answer December 21, 2007 Page 3 of 6 Qntario Ministry of the Environment Application of the Methodology to Inspection Results Based on the results of a MRDWS inspection, an overall (or total} inspection rating can be calculated. During an inspection, inspectors answer the questions that relate to regulatory compliance and input their responses as "yes", "nd' or "not applicable" into the Ministry's Laboratory & Waterworks Inspection System (LWIS) database. R "no" response indicates non-compliance. The maximum number of regulatory questions asked by an inspector varies by system (e.g. distribution, stand-alone), type of inspection (e.g. focused, detailed), source type (e.g. groundwater, surface water} as each inspection is based on a list of questions targeted to that individual MRDWS. The question ratings of all non-compliant answers are summed and divided by the sum of the question ratings of all questions asked (maximum inspection rating). The resulting total question rating is subtracted from perfect compliance (100%) to arrive at a Final Inspection Rating. The following table provides a sample inspection rating for a hypothetical inspection of two questions. In this example, the risk value of all non-compliant responses is 2 and the maximum risk value of all the questions asked is 6. Based on the inspection findings, the MRDWS would have a Total Non-Compliance Rating of 33% (room for improvement} and a Total Inspection Rating of 66%. Table 3 _- ____ _ _ _ ___ ____ _ _ ___ __ _____ _ __ _ __i __ j Maximum ~ Inspector's ~ Inspection Question Question Response Question Rating Value Do all operators possess the 1 1 x 2- 2 I N4 - 1 I 2 required certification? Rre all required microbiological 0 water quality monitoring 1 x ~ = 4 YES = 0 requirements being met? Maximum Question Rating 6 2 ~ 6 __ __ ___ -__ Total Non-Compliance Rating 2 _ 6 = 33% Final Inspection Rating I 100% - 33% = 66% The result of applying this risk-based methodology to inspection results is that the resulting rating accounts for a variety of non-compliance issues. R relatively low rating may result from incidents of non-compliance with one or two high risk requirements, or it may result from incidents of non-compliance with several medium or low risk requirements. Generally, it speaks to the overall efforts of a MRDWS to comply with all of the regulatory requirements „~,-_, ;,-, +h., C?r.~"~nnc~ of nnt~rin ~~ December 21, 2007 Page 4 Of 6 Ontario Ministry of the Environment Application of the Proposed Methodology for Public Reporting The individual MRDWS Total Inspection Ratings will be published, as a banded result, in the Ministry's Chief Drinking Water Inspector's Annual Report covering the 2006-07 inspection year. Table 4 provides the reporting methodology for expressing the inspection rating. Table 4 Style Methodology Numerical ~ Weighted percent compliance Example Provincial Reporting {5% incremental banded ratings) Individual MRDWS Reporting {i.e., 0-100%) The following graph (figure 1) presents the results of the Fiscal 2006-2007 annual inspections using the 5% banding as described above. Using this method, individual DWS can determine how they compare against all the other inspected facilities without being exposed to individual facility results. Figure 1 FY' 2006107 C~istributir~n of Ratings by ~fl,~ Banding __ _ __ _ _ -_ ~ ~ I~ ~ ~~ ~__ , ~ i ~ f ~~ .~ 1 _k Z i `~ ~ r 43~ ~ ~ .~ ~ 1~ ~j~F~ ,4c'~ .`~i ti~ .G .Q~ ,~G KGB +,G .Ci ~L.• 5`'~r Rdtlrit~ Bandlnc~ V V December 21, 2007 Page 5 of 6 Ontario Ministry of the Environment Reporting Results to MRDWS Owners/Operators A summary of inspection findings for each system will be generated in the form of a "Ministry of the Environment Drinking Water System Inspection Rating Record'. The findings are grouped into the 14 possible modules of the inspection protocol which would provide the MRDWS ownerloperator with information on the areas where they need to improve. The 14 modules are: 1. Source 2. Permit to Take Water 3. Capacity Assessment 4. Treatment Processes 5. Process Wastewater 6. Distribution System 7. Operations Manuals 8. Logbooks 9. Contingency and Emergency Planning 10. Consumer Relations 11. Certification and Training 12. Water Quality Monitoring 13. Reporting, Notification and Corrective Actions 14. Other Inspection Findings Haw Would This Process Continue in the Future? The consequence values that have been assigned to each relevant regulatory question would remain unchanged. April 1, 2006 to March 31, 2007 is the Ministry's base reporting year for applying this reporting framework. Inspection rating reporting provides MRDWS owners with the information needed to not only achieve a high rating but to comply consistently with all relevant regulatory requirements. It is the Ministry's intent to see each MRDWS owner have their own inspection rating included in their future MOE inspection reports. December 21, 2007 Page 6 of 6 Ministry of the Environment -Inspection Summary Rating Record (Reporting Year - 2006-2007) DWS Name: WARMINSTER WELL SUPPLY DWS Number: 220005125 DWS Owner: Township of Oro-Medante Municipal Location: Township of Oro-Medonte O.Reg. 170/03 Category: Large municipal residential Type of Inspection: Detailed Inspection Date: February 14, 2007 Ministry Office: Barrie District Maximum Question Rating: 263 Inspection Module Non-Compliance Rating Source 0 t 27 Permit To Take Water 2 ( 11 Capacity Assessment 0 i 13 Treatment Processes 0 / 37 Distribution System 0 ! 4 Operations Manuals 0 / 9 Logbooks 0 / 33 Contingency/Emergency Planning 0 ! 12 Consumer Relations 0 / 6 Certification and Training 0 / 21 Water Quality Monitoring 0 1 66 Reporting & Corrective Actions 0 1 24 TOTAL. 2 / 263 Yearly Comparison FY 2405106 inspec#ion Ra#ing: 96.97°ta FY 2006107 traspec#ion Ra#ing: 99.24°fb Total Non-Compliance Rating: 0.76% n ~ ~ ~ a Inspection Rating Report for WARMINSTER WELL SUPPLY {220005125) inspected on 2007/02!14 -printed on 2007/09/24 Ministry of the Environment -Detailed Inspection Rating Record (Reporting Year - 2006-2007) DWS Name: WARMINSTER WELL SUPPLY DWS Number: 220005125 DWS Owner: Township of Oro-Medonte Municipal Location: Township of Ora-Medonte O.Reg.170l03 Category: Large municipal residential Type of Inspection: Detailed Inspection Date: February 14, 2007 Ministry Office: Barrie District Inspection Questions Found with NO Answers Question Rating Permit To Take Water Are maximum takings in accordance with those allowed under the PTTW? 2 Subtotal: 2 Total Question Rating: 2 Maximum Question Rating: 263 Total Non-Compliance Rating: 0.76% „. , y ~.. a s,.. a~am ~ ~.. .. Inspection Rating Report for WARMINSTER WELL SUPPLY (220005125) inspected on 2007/02/14 -printed an 2007!09!24 ,r .... Ministry of the Environment -Inspection Summary Rating Record (Reporting Year - 2006-2007) DWS Name: CANTERBURY SUBDIVISION WELL SUPPLY DWS Number: 220007454 DWS Owner: Township of Oro-Medonte Municipal Location: Township of Oro-Medonte O.Reg. 170/03 Category: Small municipal residential Type of Inspection: Detailed Inspection Date: June 6, 2006 Ministry Office: Barrie District Maximum Question Rating: 240 Inspection Module Non-Compliance Rating Source 0 / 21 Permit To Take Water 2 / 11 Capacity Assessment 0 / 9 Treatment Processes 0 / 34 Distribution System 0 / 4 Operations Manuals 0 / 9 Logbooks 0 / 31 Contingency/Emergency Planning 0 / 12 Consumer Relations 0 / 6 Certification and Training 0 / 21 Water Quality Monitoring 0 / 60 Reporting & Corrective Actions 2 / 22 TOTAL 4 / 240 Yearly Comparison FY 2005/O6 Inspection Rating: 100.00% FY 2006107 Inspection Rating: 98.33% Total Non-Compliance Rating: 1.67% FINAL INSPECTION RATING; 98.33°I° Inspection Rating Report for CANTERBURY SUBDIVISION WELL SUPPLY (220007454) inspected on 2006/06106 -printed on 2007/09/24 r .~ . Ministry of the Environment -Detailed Inspection Rating Record (Reporting Year - 2006-2007) DWS Name: CANTERBURY SUBDIVISION WELL SUPPLY DWS Number: 220007454 DWS Owner: Township of Oro-Medonte Municipal Location: Township of Oro-Medonte O.Reg. 170103 Category: Small municipal residential Type of Inspection: Detailed Inspection Date: June 6, 2006 Ministry Office: Barrie District Inspection Questions Found with NO Answers Question Rating Permit To Take Water Are maximum takings in accordance with those allowed under the PTTW? 2 Subtotal: Reporting 8~ Corrective Actions Have Summary Reports for municipal council been completed on time and distributed in 2 accordance with the regulatory requirements? Subtotal: 2 ~ Total Question Rating: 4 Maximum Question Rating: 240 Total Non-Compliance Rating: 1.67% FINAL INSPECTION RATING: 9$.33°Io Inspection Rating Report for CANTERBURY SUBDIVISION WELL SUPPLY (220007454) inspected on 2006/06/06 -printed on 2007/09/24 Ministry of the Environment -Inspection Summary Rating Record {Reporting Year - 2406-2007} DWS Name: CEDAR BROOK SUBDIVISION WELL SUPPLY DWS Number: 220006936 DWS Uwner: Township ofOro-Medonte Municipal Location: Township of Ora-Medonte O.Reg. 170/03 Category: Small municipal residential Type of Inspection: Detailed Inspection Date: October 24, 2006 Ministry tJffice: Barrie District Maximum Question Rating: 263 Inspection Module Non-Compliance Rating Source 0 / 21 Permit To Take Water 2 / 11 Capacity Assessment 3 1 13 Treatment Processes 0 / 34 Distribution System 0 1 4 Operations Manuals 0 1 9 Logbooks 0 1 31 Contingency/Emergency Planning 0 / 12 Consumer Relations 0 ! 6 Certification and Training 0 ! 21 Water Quality Monitoring 0 / 66 Reporting & Corrective Actions 0 ! 35 TOTAL. 5 / 263 Yearly Comparison FY 2i}09I06 Inspeetiort Ratlrtg: 99.23°la FY 2I3o6l07 Inspection Rating: 98.14°l0 Total Non-Compliance Rating: 1.90% E,AL. -_ :CTION E ~ : Inspection Rating Report for CEDAR BROOK SUBDIVISION WELL SUPPLY (220006936) inspected on 2006!10/24 -printed on 2007109!24 Ministry of the Environment -Detailed Inspection Rating Record (Reporting Year - 2006-2007) DWS Name: CEDAR BROOK SUBDIVISION WELL SUPPLY DWS Number: 220006936 DWS Owner: Township of Oro-Medonte Municipal Location: Township of Oro-Medonte O.Reg. 170103 Category: Small municipal residential Type of Inspection: Detailed Inspection Date: October 24, 2006 Ministry Office: Barrie District Inspection Questions Found with NO Answers Question Rating Permlt To Take Water Are maximum takings in accordance with those allowed under the PTTW? 2 Subtotal: Capacity Assessment Were flow rates maintained below the maximum flow rates or the rated capacity i dentified in the 3 Certificate of Approval? Subtotal: 3 Total Question Rating: 5 Maximum Question Rating: 263 Total Non-Compliance Rating: 1.90% FINAL INSPECTION RATING: $8.10°l0 Inspection Rating Report for CEDAR BROOK SUBDIVISION WELL SUPPLY (220006936) inspected on 2006/10/24 -printed on 2007/09/24 Ministry of the Environment -Inspection Summary Rating Record (Reporting Year - 2006-2007) DWS Name: CRAIGHURST WELL SUPPLY DWS Number: 250001322 DWS Owner: Township of Oro-Medonte Municipal Location: Township of Oro-Medonte O.Reg. 170/03 Category: Small municipal residential Type of Inspection: Detailed Inspection Date: October 3, 2006 Ministry Office: Barrie District Maximum Question Rating: 268 Inspection Module Non-Compliance Rating Source 0 / 21 Permit To Take Water 2 1 11 Capacity Assessment 0 / 9 Treatment Processes 0 / 37 Distribution System 0 / 4 Operations Manuals 0 / 9 Logbooks 0 / 33 Contingency/Emergency Planning 0 / 12 Consumer Relations 0 1 6 Certification and Training 0 ( 21 Water Quality Monitoring 0 / 66 Reporting & Corrective Actions 0 ! 35 Other Inspection Findings 0 / 4 TOTAL 2 / 268 Yearly Comparison FY 2005/06 lnspec#ion Rating: 9&.82°l~ FY 2006f07 inspec#ion Rating: 99.25°!a Total Non-Compliance Rating: 0.75% 1~1Ai- Iiti3SPCT0 RATS: 89,2,5°l° Inspection Rating Report for CRAIGHURST WELL SUPPLY (250001322) inspected on 2006110/03 -printed on 2007(09124 Ministry of the Environment -Detailed Inspection Rating Record (Reporting Year - 2006-2007) DWS Name: CRAIGHURST WELL SUPPLY DWS Number: 250001322 DWS Owner: Township of Oro-Medonte Municipal Location: Township of Oro-Medonte O.Reg. 170103 Category: Small municipal residential Type of Inspection: Detailed Inspection Date: October 3, 2006 Ministry Office: Barrie District Inspection Questions Found with NO Answers Question Rating Permit To Take Water Are maximum takings in accordance with those allowed under the PTTW? 2 Subtotal 2 Total Question Rating: 2 Maximum Question Rating: 268 Total Non-Compliance Rating: 0.75°!0 '"- a25°l° Inspection Rating Report for CRAIGHURST WELL SUPPLY {250001322} inspected on 2006!10/03 -printed on 2007/09/24 Ministry of the Environment -Inspection Summary Rating Record (Reporting Year - 2006-2007) DWS Name: HARBOURWOOD WELL SUPPLY DWS Number: 220006703 DWS Owner: Township of Oro-Medonte Municipal Location: Township of Oro-Medonte O.Reg.170/03 Category: Large municipal residential Type of Inspection: Detailed Inspection Date: September 12, 2006 Ministry Office: Barrie District Maximum Question Rating: 253 Inspection Module Non-Compliance Rating Source 3 / 21 Permit To Take Water 2 1 11 Capacity Assessment 7 / 13 Treatment Processes 0 t 37 Distribution System 0 ! 4 Operations Manuals 0 / 9 Logbooks 0 ! 33 ContingencylEmergencyP!anning 0 / 12 Consumer Relations 0 / 6 Certification and Training 0 ! 21 Water Quality Monitoring 0 / 66 Reporting & Corrective Actions 0 / 20 TOTA<_ 12 / 253 Yearly Comparison FY 2005106 Inspection Rating: 97.84°1° FY 2006{07 Inspection Rating: 95.26°I° Total Non-Compliance Rating: 4.74% Inspection Rating Report for HARBOURWOOD WELL SUPPLY (220006703} inspected on 2006/09/12 -printed on 2007!09724 Ministry of the Environment -Detailed Inspection Rating Record (Reporting Year - 2006-2007) DWS Name: HARBOURWOOD WELL SUPPLY DWS Number: 220006703 DWS Owner: Township of Oro-Medonte Municipal Location: Township of Oro-Medonte O.Reg. 170/03 Category: Large municipal residential Type of Inspection: Detailed Inspection Date: September 12, 2006 Ministry Office: Barrie District Inspection Questions Found with NO Answers Question Rating Source Is there evidence that, when constructed, the annular space around the casing was adequately 3 filled with sealing material? Subtotal: 3~ Permit To Take Water Are maximum takings in accordance with those allowed under the PTTW? 2 Subtotal: Capacity Assessment Were flow rates maintained below the maximum flow rates or the rated capacity identified in the 3 Certificate of Approval? If required by Certificate of Approval, was the time and duration recorded for each capacity 2 exceedence along with the reason for the occurrence? If the maximum flows exceeded those allowed by the Certificate of Approval, were they for an 2 accepted reason (i.e. fire fighting demand, maintenance, etc.)? ~t Subtotal: 7 ~ Total Question Rating: 12 Maximum Question Rating: 253 Total Non-Compliance Rating: 4.74% FINAL INSPECTION RATING: 95.26% Inspection Rating Report for HARBOURWOOD WELL SUPPLY (220006703) inspected on 2006/09/12 -printed on 2007/09/24 Ministry of the Environment -Inspection Summary Rating Record {Reporting Year - 2006-2047) DWS Name: HORSESHOE VALLEY SUBDIVISION WELL SUPPLY DWS Number: 250001402 DWS Owner: Tawnship of Ora-Medante Municipal Location: Township of Ora-Medonte O.Reg. 170/03 Category: Large municipal residential Type of Inspection: Detailed Inspection Date: August 22, 2006 Ministry Office: Barrie District Maximum Question Rating: 254 Inspection Module Non-Compliance Rating Saurce 0 1 24 Permit To Take Water 2 / 11 Capacity Assessment 3 1 13 Treatment Processes 0 ! 34 Distribution System 0 / 4 Operations Manuals 0 / 9 Logbooks 0 / 33 Contingency/Emergency Planning 0 / 9 Consumer Relations 0 / 6 Certification and Training 0 / 21 Water Quality Monitoring 4 / 66 Reporting & Corrective Actions 0 ( 24 TOTAL 9 ! 254 Yearly Comparison FY 20A5lCt6 Inspection Rating: 100A0°lo FY 20461f17 Inspection Rating: 96.46°l0 Total Non-Compliance Rating: 3.54% ~ a SAL ,,~, .. Inspection Rating Report for HORSESHOE VALLEY SUBDIVISION WELL SUPPLY (250001402} inspected on 2006/08/22 - printed on 2007/09/24 Ministry of the Environment -Detailed Inspection Rating Record (Reporting Year - 2006-2007) DWS Name: HORSESHOE VALLEY SUBDIVISION WELL SUPPLY DWS Number: 250001402 DWS Owner: Township of Oro-Medonte Municipal Location: Township of Oro-Medonte O.Reg.170/03 Category: Large municipal residential Type of Inspection: Detailed Inspection Date: August 22, 2006 Ministry Office: Barrie District Inspection Questions Found with NO Answers Question Rating Permit To Take Water Are maximum takings in accordance with those allowed under the PTTW? 2 Subtotal: 2~ Capacity Assessment Were flow rates maintained below the maximum flow rates or the rated capacity identified in the 3 Certificate of Approval? Subtotal: 3~ Water Quality Monitoring Are all microbiological water quality monitoring requirements prescribed by legislation being 4 met? Subtotal: 4 I Total Question Rating: 9 Maximum Question Rating: 254 Total Non-Compliance Rating: 3.54% FINAL INSPECTION RATING: 96.46% Inspection Rating Report for HORSESHOE VALLEY SUBDIVISION WELL SUPPLY (250001402) inspected on 2006/08/22 - printed on 2007/09/24 _. Ministry of the Environment -Inspection Summary Rating Record (Reporting Year - 2006-2007) DWS Name: MAPLEWOOD ESTATES WELL SUPPLY DWS Number: 220004135 DWS Owner: Township of Oro-Medonte Municipal Location: Township of Oro-Medonte O.Reg. 170103 Category: Small municipal residential Type of Inspection: Detailed Inspection Date: July 27, 2006 Ministry Office: Barrie District Maximum Question Rating: 256 Inspection Module Non-Compliance Rating Source 0 / 24 Permit To Take Water 0 1 11 Capacity Assessment 0 / 13 Treatment Processes 0 / 37 Distribution System 0 / 4 Operations Manuals 0 / 9 Logbooks 0 / 33 Contingency/Emergency Planning 0 1 12 Consumer Relations 0 ! 6 Certification and Training 0 1 21 Water Quality Monitoring 0 ! 66 Reporting & Corrective Actions 0 1 20 TOTAL 0 / 256 Yearly Comparison FY 2005106 Inspec#ion Rating: 93A0°la FY 2006(07 Inspection Ra#ing: 100.00°l0 Total Non-Compliance Rating: 0.00% - ~ ' GT, a: ~~° Inspection Rating Report for MAPLEWOOD ESTATES WELL SUPPLY {220004135} inspected on 2006107127 -printed on 2007109/24 Ministry of the Environment -Detailed Inspection Rating Record (Reporting Year - 2006-2007) DWS Name: MAPLEWOOD ESTATES WELL SUPPLY DWS Number: 220004135 DWS Owner: Township of Ora-Medonte Municipal Location: Township of Oro-Medonte O.Reg. 170103 Category: Small municipal residential Type of Inspection: Detailed Inspection Date: July 27, 2006 Ministry Office: Barrie District Inspection Questions Found with NO Answers (There were na questions in non-compliance) Question Rating Total Question Rating: 0 Inspection Rating Report for MAPLEWOOD ESTATES WELL SUPPLY (220004135} inspected on 2006(07127 -printed on 2007109!24 Ministry of the Environment -Inspection Summary Rating Record (Reporting Year - 2006-2007) DWS Name: MEDONTE HILLS WELL SUPPLY DWS Number: 220003920 DWS Owner: Township of Oro-Medonte Municipal Location: Township of Ora-Medonte O.Reg. 170!03 Category: Large municipal residential Type of Inspection: Detailed Inspection Date: November 14, 2006 Ministry Office: Barrie District Maximum Question Rating: 252 Inspection Module Non-Compliance Rating Source 0 1 21 Permit To Take Water 0 / 11 Capacity Assessment 0 1 9 Treatment Processes 0 1 34 Distribution System 0 / 4 Operations Manuals 0 / 9 Logbooks 0 / 33 Contingency/Emergency Planning 0 / 12 Consumer Relations 0 / 6 Certification and Training 0 / 21 Water Quality Monitoring 0 / 66 Reporting & Corrective Actions 0 1 26 TOTAL 0 ( 252 Yearly Comparison FY 2005tOti Inspection Rating; ~~~~_ 100.00°!° FY 200fif07 Inspection Rating: 100.00°I° Total Non-Compliance Rating: 0.00°l0 L iNSRECTiON i T: 00y3°1'° ° Inspection Rating Report for MEDONTE HILLS WELL SUPPLY (220003920) inspected on 2006/11!14 -printed on 2007!09/24 Ministry of the Environment -Detailed Inspection Rating Record (Reporting Year - 2006-2007) DWS Name: MEDONTE HILLS WELL SUPPLY DWS Number: 220003920 DWS Owner: Township of Oro-Medonte Municipal Location: Township ofOro-Medonte O.Reg. 170103 Category: Large municipal residential Type of Inspection: Detailed Inspection Date: November 14, 2006 Ministry Office: Barrie District Inspection Questions Found with NO Answers (There were no questions in non-compliance) Question Rating Total Question Rating: 0 Maximum Question Rating: 252 Total Non-Compliance Rating: 0.00% FINAL INSPECTION RATING: 100.00°l° Inspection Rating Report for MEDONTE HILLS WELL SUPPLY (220003920} inspected on 2006/11/14 -printed on 2007/09/24 Ministry of the Environment -Inspection Summary Rating Record {Reporting Year - 2006-2007} DWS Name: ROBIN CREST WELL SUPPLY DWS Number: 220010752 DWS Owner: Township of Oro-Medonte Municipal Location: Township of Ora-Medonte O.Reg. 170103 Category: urge municipal residential Type of Inspection: Focused Inspection Date: January 9, 2007 Ministry Office: Barrie District Maximum Question Rating: 73 Inspection Module Non-Compliance t2atirag__ Source 0 / 3 Capacity Rssessment 0 / 3 Treatment Processes 0 / 16 Operations Manuals 0 / 6 Water Quality Monitoring 0 ! 25 Reporting & Corrective Actions 0 / 20 TOTAL 0 1 73 Yearly Comparison FY 2005!06 Inspection Rating: 99.18°I° FY 2006!07 Inspection Rating: 100.00°I° Total Non-Compliance Rating: 0.00% ~ o ~ ~: 100.OO~~c~ Inspection Rating Report for ROBIN CREST WELL SUPPLY (220010752) inspected on 2007/01!09 -printed on 2007/09!24 Ministry of the Environment -Detailed Inspection Rating Record {Reporting Year - 2006-2007} DWS Name: ROBIN CREST WELL SUPPLY DWS Number: 220010752 DWS Owner: Township afOro-Medonte Municipal Location: Township of Oro-Medonte O.Reg. 170103 Category: Large municipal residential Type of Inspection: Focused Inspection Qate: January 9, 2007 Ministry Office: Barrie District Inspection Questions Found with NO Answers Question Rating (There were no questions in non-compliance) Total Question Rating: 0 Maximum Question Rating: 73 Total Non-Compliance Rating: 0.00°!0 ~. rp Inspection Rating Report for ROBIN CREST WELL SUPPLY (220010752) inspected on 2007101109 -printed on 2007109/24 Ministry of the Environment -Inspection Summary Rating Record (Reporting Year - 2006-2007) DWS Name: SHANTY BAY WELL SUPPLY DWS Number: 220005198 DWS Owner: Township of Oro-Medonte Municipal Location: Township of Ora-Medonte O.Reg. 170/03 Category: large municipal residential Type of Inspection: Detailed Inspection Date: December 5, 2006 Ministry Office: Barrie District Maximum Question Rating: 253 Inspection Module Non-Compliance Rating Source 0 / 24 Permit To Take Water 0 / 11 Capacity Assessment 0 ! 13 Treatment Processes 0 / 34 Distribution System 0 1 4 Operations Manuals 0 / 9 logbooks 0 1 33 Contingency/Emergency Planning 0 / 12 Consumer Relations 0 ( 6 Certification and Training 0 / 21 Water Quality Monitoring 0 / 66 Reporting & Corrective Actions 0 / 20 TOTAL 0 / 253 Yearly Comparison FY 2405146 Inspection Rating; 99.15°I° FY 2406/47 Inspec#ion Rating: 144.44°l° Total Nan-Compliance Rating: 0.00°I° ,~ ~ :TiOd RTiNO: 10 Inspection Rating Report for SHANTY BAY WELL SUPPLY (220005198) inspected on 2006112105 -printed on 2007!09124 Ministry of the Environment -Detailed Inspection Rating Record (Reporting Year - 2006-2007) DWS Name: SHANTY BAY WELL SUPPLY DWS Number: 220005198 DWS Owner: Township of Oro-Medonte Municipal Location: Township of Oro-Medonte O.Reg.170/03 Category: Large municipal residential Type of Inspection: Detailed Inspection Date: December 5, 2006 Ministry Office: Barrie District Inspection Questions Found with NO Answers Question Rating (There were no questions in nan-compliance) Total Question Rating: 0 Maximum Questian Rating: 253 Total Non-Compliance Rating: 0.00°l0 Inspection Rating Report for SHANTY BAY WELL SUPPLY (220005198) inspected on 2006/12105 -printed on 2007!09124 Ministry of the Environment -Inspection Summary Rating Record (Reporting Year - 2006-2047} DWS Name: SUGAR BUSH WELL SUPPLY DWS Number: 220001518 DWS Owner: Township of Oro-Medonte Municipal Location: Township of Oro-Medonte O.Reg. 170/03 Category: urge municipal residential Type of Inspection: Detailed Inspection Date: February 20, 2007 Ministry Office: Barrie District Maximum Question Rating: 244 Inspection Module Non-Compliance Rating Source 0 1 24 Permit To Take Water 0 t 11 Capacity Assessment 0 ( 9 Treatment Processes 0 / 34 Distribution System 0 1 4 Operations Manuals 0 ! 9 Logbooks 0 / 33 Contingency/Emergency Planning 0 1 9 Consumer Relations 0 / 6 Certification and Training 0 / 21 Water Quality Monitoring 4 1 66 Reporting & Corrective Actions 0 ! 18 TOTAL 4 / 244 Yearly Comparison EY 2dI(15Jt)6 Inspection Rating: 9$.87% FY 2006107 Inspection Rating: 9$.38`70 Total Non-Compliance Rating: 1.64°I° ®. i- ON ip Inspection Rating Report for SUGAR BUSH WELL SUPPLY (220001518) inspected on 2007/02/20 -printed on 2007(09!24 ~_. , _~., Ministry of the Environment -Detailed Inspection Rating Record (Reporting Year - 2006-2007) DWS Name: SUGAR BUSH WELL SUPPLY DWS Number: 220001518 DWS Owner: Township of Oro-Medonte Municipal Location: Township of C?ro-Medonte O.Reg. 170/03 Category: Large municipal residential Type of Inspection: Detailed Inspection Date: February 20, 2007 Ministry Office: Barrie District Inspection Questions Found with NO Answers Question Rating Water Quality Monitoring Are all physical/chemical water quality monitoring requirements prescribed by legislation being 4 met? Subtotal: 4 Total Question Rating: 4 Maximum Question Rating: 244 Total Non-Compliance Rating: 1.64a/o g~ Inspection Rating Report for SUGAR BUSH WELL SUPPLY (220001518} inspected on 2007!02!20 -printed on 2007(09/24 ~, Ministry of the Environment -Inspection Summary Rating Record (Reporting Year - 2007-2008) DWS Name: MAPLEWOOD ESTATES WELL SUPPLY DWS Number: 220004135 DWS Owner: Township of Oro-Medonte Municipal Location: Township of Oro-Medonte O.Reg. '170103 Category: Small municipal residential Type of Inspection: Detailed Inspection Date: June 5, 2007 Ministry Office: Barrie District Maximum Question Rating: 245 Inspection Module Non-Compliance Rating Source 0 ! 1$ Permit To Take Water 0 / 11 Capacity Assessment 0 / 9 Treatment Processes 0 i 37 Distribution System 0 / 6 Operations Manuals 0 / 9 Logbooks 0 l 31 Contingency/Emergency Planning 0 ! 12 Consumer Relations 0 1 6 Certification and Training 0 / 23 Water Quality Monitoring 0 / 63 Reporting & Corrective Actions 0 / 20 TOTAL 0 1 245 Yearly Comparison i`Y 2aa5ras inspection Rating: s3.4o°I° FY 2aaSta7 inspection Rating: 10a.aa°I° FY 2aa7(a~ inspection Rating: 1aa.aa°!° Total Non-Compliance Rating: 0.00°Io Inspection Rating Report for MAPLEWOOD ESTATES WELL SUPPLY (220004135) inspected on 06!05/2007 -printed on 2007!11126 Ministry of the Environment -Detailed Inspection Rating Record (Reporting Year - 2007-2008) DWS Name: MAPLEWOOD ESTATES WELL SUPPLY DWS Number: 220004135 DWS Owner: Township ofOro-Medonte Municipal Location: Township of Oro-Medonte O.Reg. 170/03 Gategory: Small municipal residential Type of Inspection: Detailed Inspection Date: June 5, 20{77 Ministry Office: Barrie District Inspection Questions Found with NO Answers (There were no questions in non-compliance) Question Rating Total Question Rating: 0 Maximum Question Rating: 245 Total Non-Gompliance Rating: 0.00% I Inspection Rating Report for MAPLEWOOD ESTATES WELL SUPPLY {220004135} inspected on 06105!2007 -printed on 2007!11 /26 Ministry of the Environment -Inspection Summary Rating Record (Reporting Year - 2007-2008) DWS Name: CANTERBURY SUBDIVISION WELL SUPPLY DWS Number: 220007454 DWS Owner: Township of Oro-Medonte Municipal Location: Township of Oro-Medonte O.Reg.170/03 Category: Small municipal residential Type of Inspection: Detailed Inspection Date: May 2, 2007 Ministry Office: Barrie District Maximum Question Rating: 252 Inspection Module Non-Compliance Rating Source 0 / 21 Permit To Take Water 0 / 11 Capacity Assessment 0 / 9 Treatment Processes 0 / 37 Distribution System 0 / 6 Operations Manuals 0 / 9 Logbooks 0 / 31 Contingency/Emergency Planning 0 / 12 Consumer Relations 0 / 6 Certification and Training 0 / 23 Water Quality Monitoring 0 / 63 Reporting & Corrective Actions 0 / 24 TOTAL 0 / 252 Yearly Comparison FY 2005/06 Inspection Rating: 100.00% FY 2006!07 Inspection Rating: 98.33°I° FY 2007!08 Inspection Rating: 100.00% Total Non-Compliance Rating: 0.00% FINAL I~ISPEGTION RATING: 100.00°l° Inspection Rating Report for CANTERBURY SUBDIVISION WELL SUPPLY (220007454) inspected on 05!02/2007 -printed on 2007!11/26 .~ ~-< Ministry of the Environment -Detailed Inspection Rating Record (Reporting Year - 2007-2008) DWS Name: CANTERBURY SUBDIVISION WELL SUPPLY DWS Number: 220007454 DWS Owner: Township of Oro-Medonte Municipal Location: Township of Oro-Medonte O.Reg. 170/03 Category: Small municipal residential Type of Inspection: Detailed Inspection Date: May 2, 2007 Ministry Office: Barrie District Inspection Questions Found with NO Answers Question Rating (There were no questions in non-compliance) Total Question Rating: 0 Maximum Question Rating: 252 Total Non-Compliance Rating: 0.00% - Y f g 6 s$ ® • =. Inspection Rating Report for CANTERBURY SUBDIVISION WELL SUPPLY (220007454) inspected on 05/02/2007 -printed on 2007!11!26 Ministry of the Environment -Inspection Summary Rating Record (Reporting Year - 2007-2008) DWS Name: CRAIGHURST WELL SUPPLY DWS Number: 250001322 DWS Owner: Township of Oro-Medonte Municipal Location: Township of Oro-Medonte O.Reg. 170103 Category: Small municipal residential Type of Inspection: Detailed Inspection Date: September 25, 2007 Ministry Office: Barrie District Maximum Question Rating: 257 Inspection Module Non-Compliance Rating Source 0 / 21 Permit To Take Water 0 1 11 Capacity,4ssessment 0 / 9 Treatment Processes 0 ! 34 Distribution System 0 ! 6 Operations Manuals 0 t 9 Logbooks 0 ! 31 Contingency(EmergencyPianning 0 1 12 Consumer Relations 0 ( 6 Certification and Training 0 1 23 Water Quality Monitoring 0 / 60 Reporting & Corrective Actions 0 (35 TOTAL 0 1 257 Yearly Comparison FY 2a05Fa6 Inspection Rating: 9$.$2°fa FY 2aa6fa7 Inspection Rating: 99.25°!a FY zaa7ra$ Inspection Rating: 1oa.ao~r~ Total Non-Compliance Rating: 0.00°I° ~, ~ rt Inspection Rating Report for CRAIGHURST WELL SUPPLY (250001322} inspected on 09125/2007 -printed on 2007/11/26 Ministry of the Environment -Detailed Inspection Rating Record (Reporting Year - 2007-2008) DWS Name: CRAIGHURST WELL SUPPLY DWS Number: 250001322 DWS Owner: Township of Oro-Medonte Municipal Location: Township of Ora-Medonte O.Reg. 170!03 Category: Small municipal residential Type of Inspection: Detailed Inspectian Date: September 25, 2007 Ministry Office: Barrie District Inspection Questions Found with NO Answers Question Rating (There were no questions in non-compliance) Total Question Rating: 0 Maximum Question Rating: 257 Total Non-Compliance Rating: 0.00°l0 ?~ ~ __ Inspection Rating Report for CRAIGHURST WELL SUPPLY (250001322} inspected on 09!25/2007 -printed on 2007111/26 Ministry of the Environment -Inspection Summary Rating Record {Reporting Year - 2007-2008) DWS Name: HARBOURWOOD WELL SUPPLY DWS Number: 220006703 DWS Owner: Township of Ora-Medonte Municipal Location: Township of Oro-Medonte O.Reg. 170/03 Category: Large municipal residential Type of inspection: Detailed Inspection Date: August 21, 2007 Ministry Office: Barrie District Maximum Question Rating: 242 Inspection Module Non-Compliance Rating Source 0 J 21 Permit Ta Take Water 0 / 11 Gapacity Assessment 0 / 9 Treatment Processes 0 ! 34 Distribution System 0 / 6 Operations Manuals 0 ( 9 Logbooks 0 / 31 Contingency/Emergency Planning 0 / 12 Gonsumer Relations 0 ( 6 Certification and Training 0 / 23 Water Quality Monitoring 0 1 60 Reporting & Corrective Actions 0 / 20 TOTAL 0 / 242 Yearly Comparison FY 2aas/06 inspection Rating: 97.$4°fo FY 2a06/07 inspec#ion Rating: 95.26°fo FY 2a071a$ inspection Rating: 1aa.aa"da Total Non-Compliance Rating: 0.00% t~ - __: 10 ° ~~ ~ Inspection Rating Report for HARBOURWOOD WELL SUPPLY (220006703) inspected on 08!21(2007 -printed on 2007!11126 - ~., Ministry of the Environment -Detailed Inspection Rating Record (Reporting Year - 2007-2008) DWS Name: HARBOURWOOD WELL SUPPLY DWS Number: 220006703 DWS Owner: Township of Ora-Medonte Municipal Location: Township of Oro-Medonte O.Reg. 170103 Category: Large municipal residential Type of Inspection: Detailed Inspection Date: August 21, 2007 Ministry Office: Barrie District Inspection Questions Found with NO Rnswers Question Rating (There were no questions in non-compliance) Total Question Rating: 0 Maximum Question Rating: 242 Total Non-Compliance Rating: 0.00°l0 ,~ Inspection Rating Report for HARBOURWOOD WELL SUPPLY (220006703) inspected on 08/2112007 -printed on 2007/11126 Ministry of the Environment -Inspection Summary Rating Record (Reporting Year - 2007-2008) DWS Name: HORSESHOE VALLEY SUBQIVISION WELL SUPPLY DWS Number: 25000140E DWS Owner: Township of Oro-Medonte Municipal Location: Township of Oro-Medonte O.Reg. 170103 Category: Large municipal residential Type of Inspection: Detailed Inspection Date: July 24, 2007 Ministry Office: Barrie District Maximum Question Rating: 248 inspection Module Non-Compliance Rating Source 0 1 24 Permit To Take Water 0 / 11 Capacity Assessment 0 ( 9 Treatment Processes 0 / 37 Distribution System 0 1 6 Operations Manuals 0 1 9 Logbooks 0 1 31 Contingency/Emergency Planning 0 1 9 Consumer Relations 0 ! 6 Certification and Training 0 / 23 Water Quality Monitoring 0 ! 63 Reporting & Corrective Actions 0 / 20 TOTAL 0 l 248 Yearly Comparison FY 2a05/06 Inspection Rating: 1aa.aa°!° FY 2a06(a7 inspection Rating: 96.46°1° FY 2aa7ras inspection Rating: 1aa.aa°i° Total Non-Compliance Rating: 0.00% Inspection Rating Report for HORSESHOE VALLEY SUBDIVISION WELL SUPPLY (250001402) inspected on 07/2412007 - printed on 2007!11!26 Ministry of the Environment -Detailed Inspection Rating Record (Reporting Year - 2007-2008) DWS Name: HORSESHOE VALLEY SUBDIVISION WELL SUPPLY DWS Number: 250001402 DWS Owner: Township of Oro-Medonte Municipal Location: Township of Oro-Medonte O.Reg. 170/03 Category: Large municipal residential Type of Inspection: Detailed Inspection Date: July 24, 2007 Ministry Office: Barrie District Inspection Questions Found with NO Answers (There were no questions in non-compliance) Question Rating Total Question Rating: 0 Maximum Question Rating: 248 Total Non-Compliance Rating: 0.00% FINAL INSPEOTION RATING: 1t~0.00% Inspection Rating Report for HORSESHOE VALLEY SUBDIVISION WELL SUPPLY (250001402) inspected on 07/24/2007 - printed on 2007/11/26 To The Corporation of The Township of Oro Medonte 148 Line 7 South, Box 100 Oro, ON, LOL-2X0 _w__,_... ._ _.___ ~~ January 6, 2008 Dear Oro Medonte Officials and Councillors, Re: Resort -Style of Housing for Future HV Developments It is a concern of many Horseshoe Valley residents that for any future residential construction in the Valley as well as in the Highlands, there may not be sufficient stipulation or control as to the "resort-style" of housing, which should be built and which has made this area so very desirable. This is in particular true for the next phases of the Landscapes Development, for which Horseshoe Resort is looking for a large builder, who could handle the entire development. Typically, large builders will aim at only a few styles of houses with minor variations, since this "cookie -cutter" type of construction would be cheaper. We all have seen the disastrous results in areas of Taranto, Mississauga, Brampton, Vaughn, etc. and would not like to have that repeated in Horseshoe Valley. As well, more flexible lot sizes, providing a healthy mix of larger and smaller properties are believed to enhance the appearance as well as the interest and thus sales of housing in the development. We would like to urge the Township and Horseshoe Resort, to work together on a plan and architectural parameters to be adhered to, possibly following the example of Landscapes -Phase 1, to ensure that Horseshoe Valley remains as beautiful as it is now. HVPOA would strongly support such an effort by the above mentioned parties involved. Respectfully, Uli Surmann, HVPOA Municipal AfFairs CC: Mayor Hughes Mel Coutanche, Councillor, Ward 1 Horseshoe Resort, Mr. R. Andrews Horseshoe Resort, Mr. 7. Boville HVPOA President 7udy Sutherland To The Corporation of The Township of Oro Medante 148 Line 7 South, Box 100 Ora, ON, LOL-2X0 .lanuary 7, 2008 Dear Oro Medante Officials and Members of Council, Re: Speed Limit on Old Barrie Road at W. R. Best School The general speed limit on Old Barrie Raad (Simcoe Road 11} is 80 kmjh. This is reduced to 60 kmjh at the W. R. Best School, located just West of Line 1. Living on the West side of the Horseshoe "Highlands", this road is used by many residents, going to Barrie, Midhurst and Hwy. 400 South. This road is also travelled by a considerable amount of through traffic. While there is a definite need, to limit the speeds during school times, we would like to request the Township to consider making this speed limit active only during school times, i.e. an weekdays between 8 am and 4 pm. On weekends, holidays. and during vacation periods, the speed limit would then be always 80 kmjh, promoting an unhindered flow of traffic. The natural curve, which starts just East of the school towards Line 1 would help that this limit will be observed during the off - school times. Your positive consideration of this request would be greatly appreciated. Respectfully, Uli Surmann, HVPOA Municipal Affairs 46 Tanglewood Cres. Shanty Bay, ON, t<0~-2L0 (705) 835-0337 CC: Mel Coutanche, Councillor, Ward 1 HVPOA President Judy Sutherland ~?~'~'ri, ~u+llit~ "WHEREAS a recent gathering an the steps of Parliament in support of the One Cent NOWT Campaign took place as an ezpressian of support for transferring the equivalent of one teat of the GST to municipalities across the natiaa, and WHEREAS in recent years the Federal and Provincial governments have downloaded casts to municipalities and reduced funding in areas of infrastructure to municipalities making the request far COMRIF funding competitive, and WHEREAS the Federal government, effective January 1, 2008 has reduced the GSfi to S°lo, and WHEREAS it is felt by the One Cent NOWT Campaign that lost capital that would have been gained from the GST could be regained and distributed to municipalities far infrastructure projects and would deliver about 5 billion dollars per year to municipalities from coast to coast to coast, NOW THEREFORE BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED THAT the Council of The Corporation of the Citp of Owea Sound hereby supgorts the One Ceat NOWT Campaign, and further THAT funding gained from the One Cent NOW2 Campaign be disbursed to municipalities to support local infrastruc#ure, and further THAT this resolutiaa be forwarded to Prime Minister Steven Harper; The Honourable Jim Flaherty, Federal Minister of Finance; the Honourable Lawrence Cannon, Minister of Transportation, Infrastructure and Communities; Larry Miller, M.P., Bruce-Grey-Owen Sound; and the Federation of Canadian Municipalities, seeking their support of the efforts of municipalities in gaining funding toward local infrastructure, and further THAT this resolution be copied to Premier Daitaa McGuintp; The Honourable Dwight Duncan, Provincial Minister of Finance; The Honourable David Caplan, Minister of Public Infrastructure Renewal; the Association of Municipalities of Ontario; Bill Murdoch, M.P.P., Bruce-Grey-Owen Sound; and Magar David Miller, City of Toronto, and further THAT this resolutiaa be copied to St~phaae Dion, Leader of the Federal Ogpasition Party and John Tory, Leader of the Provincial Opposition Party, and further THAT this resolution be circulated to all municipalities in Ontario through an AMO broadcast seeking support of municipalities to gain funding for local infrastructure projects." Contact Information: Marion I. Koepke, C.M.Q. City Clerk City of Qwen Sound 808 2nd Avenue East Qwen Sound, Qntario N4K 2H4 Phone (519) 376-1440 ex 221 Fax (519) 371-0511 E-mail ankc _~: _. ._-d.~ «~~ DlSCLA/MER This matenaf is provided under contract as a paid service try the originating organization and does not necessarily reflect the view or positions of the Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO), its subsidiary companies, ofircers, directors or agents a Environment Environnement Canada Canada Ontario Region Region de ('Ontario 4905 Dufferin Street 4905, rue Dufferin Downsview, Ontario Downsview, Ontario M3H 5T4 M3H 5T4 January 10, 2008 Severn Sound Environmental Association c/o Oave Parks, Chair Township of Severn P.O. Box 159, Orillia, Ontario, L3V 6J3 Dear Mr. Parks: i ,_t On April 2nd 2004, the Letter of Agreement to renew the Severn Sound Environmental Association {SSEA) 2004/2009 (the "Agreement") was entered into by the following parties: • Environment Canada, • Ontario Ministry of the Environment, • the Corporation of the Town of Midland, • the Corporation of the Town of Penetanguishene, • the Corporation of the City of Orillia, • the Corporation of the Township of Tay, • the Corporation of the Township of Tiny, • the Corporation of the Township of Severn, • the Corporation of the Township of Georgian Bay, • the Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte, • the Corporation of the Township of Springwater, This letter is notifying you that pursuant to section 2.12 of the Agreement, Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of the Environment will be withdrawing from the Agreement at the expiry of 120 days following the date of issuance of the present notice being January 10, 2008, {the "effective date of the withdrawal"). At our meeting with you and Keith Sherman on January 4, 2008, in Orillia Ontario, Environment Canada agreed to honour its funding commitment of $37,000.00 pursuant to section 2.8 of the agreement far the government of Canada's fiscal year ending March 31, 2008. Further, we agreed that it would not be expedient or advisable to extend the agreement in any form as per section 4.2 of the agreement nor would funding be provided to the SSEA by Environment Canada beyond March 31, 2008. Invoices prepared pursuant to section 2.7 of the Agreement shall clearly indicate where the funds have been expended or committed and shall be accompanied by supporting documentation for which reimbursement is requested. Operations Division (Ontario) (attachment) Canada c.c. Keith Sherman, Coordinator Severn Sound Environmental Association 67 Fourth Street Midland Ontario L4R 3S9 Jim Richardson, Regional Director Ontario Ministry of the Environment Southwest Region 733 Exeter Rd. London, Ontario, N6E 1 L3 C.A.O./Town Clerk Toavn of Midland 575 Dominion Ave. Midland, Ontario L4R 1 R2 C.A.O./Town Clerk Town of Penetanguishene 10 Robert St. W. Penetanguishene, Ontario L9M 2G2 Administrator-Clerk Township of Tay P.O.Box 100 Victoria Harbour, Ontario LOK i City Clerk City of Orillia 50 Andrew St. S Orillia, Ontario L3V 7T5 C.A.O./Clerk Township of Tiny RR#1 Perkinsfield, Ontario, LOL 2J0 C.A.O. Township of Severn P.O. Box 159, Orillia, Ontario, L3V 6J3 Administrator-Clerk Township of Georgian Bay RR#1 Port Severn, Ontario LOK 1 SO Clerk Corporation of the Township of Oro- Medonte P.O Box 100 Oro, Ontario LOL 2X0 Clerk Township of Springwater Simooe County Administrative Centre Midhurst, Ontario LOL 1X0 TOWNSHIP pF QRO-MEL?ONTE REPORT Report No. To: Prepared By: TR 2008-01 Committee of the Whole Bonnie McPhee Meeting Date: Subject: Motion # January 16, 2008 Statement of Accounts - ~_ Roll #: December 2007 R.M.S. File #: RECOMENDATION(S): Requires Action For Information Only It is recommended that: 1. That Report No. TR 2008-01 is received. 2. The accounts for the month of December 2007 totalling $6,081,325.19 are received. BACKGROUND: Following is the statement of accounts far the month of December. Batch Flo. Date Amount Cheaue Resisters: AC00464 December 05, 2007 $ 5,053,949.57 AQ00363 December 06, 2007 514.93 AQ00364 December 12, 2007 2,000.00 AC00465 December 12, 2007 286,697.11 AQ00366 December 14, 2007 700.00 AQ00368 December 14, 2007 147,925.67 AQ00369 December 19, 2007 13,341.00 AC00466 December 19, 2007 86,150.72 AC00467 December 20, 2007 254,487.45 $ 5,845,766.45 Payroll: PR00267 December 08, 2007 $118,893.79 PR00270 December 22, 2007 113,432.10 232,325.89 TREASURY January 16, 2008 Report No. 2008-01 Page 1 of 2 Credit Card Registers: AE0070 December 05, 2007 47.63 AE0071 December 18, 2007 142.59 AE0072 December 18, 2007 212.00 AE0073 December 18, 2007 1,017.61 AE0074 December 18, 2007 699.90 AE0075 December 18, 2007 377.4$ AE0076 December 18, 2007 775.64 3,232.85 Total $ 6,081,325.19 ATTACHMENTS: Cheque registers. CONCLUSION: That the accounts for the month of December are received. Respectfully submitted: Bonnie McPhee Accounting Clerk ~,,. ~r ~„ TREASURY January 16, 2008 Report Mo. 2008-01 Page Z of 2 TOWNSHIP OF t~RQ-MEDC}NTE I REPC?RT Report No. To: Prepared By: Paul TR200t#-02 Committee of the Whole Gravelte Meeting Date: Subject: Report on Tax Arrears Motion # January 16, 2008 Roll #: R.M.S. File #: RECOMMENDATION(S): Requires Action For Information Only It is recommended that: 1. Report TR2008-02 be received. BACKGROUND: The Municipal Act requires the Treasurer to report annually to Council on the status of tax arrears. ANALYSIS: Accordingly, please find attached a Report on Tax Arrears as at December 31, 2007. FINANCIAL: NIA POLICIESIL_EGIS~ATION: Municipal Act CONSULTATIONS: None Treasury January 16,2008 Report No. TR2008-02 Page 1 of 2 ATTACHMENTS: Report on Tax Arrears CQNGLUSIQN: The attached report be received as information. Respectfully si ubmitted: 3 ~. i Paul Gravelle Treasurer C.A.Q. Comments: C.A.O. Approval: Date: Treasury January 16,2008 Report No. TR2008-02 Page 2 of 2 W O W W N ~ M ~ Q ~ 0 I.1. ~"~ W a O w 0 Z Q ~ Q O~~ "~ ~ ono a o ~ ~ Q ° ~ t- o ~ ~i Q- t ~ o N C37 tX7 d' ~ O CG Q N ~ ~- ~ , ~ Z W d. ~ ~ ~'' W ~ Z M (~.. tfa t~ ~ CMiI N ~ N t~C? r d~ h- ~- N tf) ~ LJ.! X ~ N d' d' c ~ r c~Y7 U~ W ~~( r~ ~~ J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M -Mf? ~ tf} c- i CS7 cY7 N d' N t.f') N O N ~ J ~ z W a ~ LU W F Z _ d7 c- op ice- N d7 Op O d' 00 00 C'7 d' N d- oo rn r N ~ o ~ no ~ ~ W op ~ N ~ ~ ~ O? c'7 N O t- N Z ~ Z H ' -~ Q ~ W Q J L ~ ~ d L ~ ~1 r L tt5 G1 L c~6 ~ N L Rf d L R ~1 M L tC d L m U d Q Q €~' 0 C9 ~ 0 N ~ ~ ~ to tt'7 to p ~ r N 0 0 ~ c~ tf? C7~ ~ l.{) r- c~ to N N o L t3 N ~ t4 N N O +-~ O N tU ~ N ~ .~ 'C ~ to `' O tt> ~ 5Z. ~ e > O ~ ~ X i4 ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ d .~ U ~ ~ ~ ~+ L tG + ~ ° o ° X ~ ~ o E - E - ,;~ z of ~ O ~ O ~ N ~ 07 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ TC?WNSHlP OF C?RO-MEDQNTE REP©RT r Report No. TR2008-03 To: Committee of the Whole Prepared By: Paul Gravelle Meeting Date: January 16,2008 Subject: Statement of Investment Activities Motion # Roll #: R.M.S. File #: RECOMMENDATIONS}: Requires Action For Information Only It is recommended that: 1. Report TR2008-03 relating to investment activities to December 31, 2007 be received. BACKGROUND: The Municipal Act requires the Treasurer to report annually to Council on investment activities. ANALYSIS: Accordingly, please find attached the Statement of Investment Activities for the year ending December 31, 2007. FINANCIAL: None POLICIES/LEGISLATION: Municipal Act CONSULTATIONS: None Treasury January 16, 2008 Report No. TR2008-03 Page 1 of 2 ATTACHMENTS: Statement of Investment Activities C©NCLUSION: Report TR2008-03 be received as information only. Respectfully submitted: ~ r Paul Gravelle Treasurer Treasury January 16, 200$ Report No. TR2008-03 Page 2 of 2 T©WNSHIP C?F C3R4 -MEDC}NTE STATEMENT C!F INVESTMENT ACTIVITIES FQR THE PERIOD OF QCTtJBER 21,2004 TC? DECEMBER 31,2007 Interest Interest if Earned funds left in Variance bank account Prior 111/2007 Report to 31 /12106 31 /12/2007 $500,000 GIC -Royal Bank Interest Payable ez 3.55% Purchased October 21, 2004 Maturity date October 21,2009 ($100,000 maturing annually} 43,961.64 $500,000 GIC -Royal Bank Interest Payable ~ 3.10°l0 Purchased September 12,2005 Maturity date September 15, 2010 ($100,000 maturing annually} 30,702.74 $100,000 GIC -Royal Bank Interest payable @ 3.70°l° purchased October 21, 2005 Maturity date October 21, 2010 8,119.73 $100,000 GIC -Royal Bank Interest payable @4.25°l0 purchased October 21,2006 Maturity date October 21, 2011 41,822.13 2,139.51 4,261.75 -2,122.24 38,630.83 -7,928.09 -3,475.06 -4,453.03 8,826.13 -706.40 -90.57 -615.83 5,076.71 5,125.03 -48.32 17.50 -65.82 MFOA One Funds -Money Market Fund $1,500,000 invested June 7, 2006 withdrawn June 22, 2007 63,360.60 Additional interest revenue Interest gained due to investment otherwise BMO bank account in excess of bank's $10,000,000 limit at which interest no longer paid Interest revenue lost as BMO bank account balance in excess of $10,000,000 Total additional revenue due to investment activities 64,693.15 -1,599.55 -466.23 -1,133.32 -8,142.85 247.39 -8,390.24 49,386.23 36,652.60 12,733.63 -3,221.46 -3,209.67 -11.79 38,021.92 33,690.32 4,331.60 r ~ . t)1 ctRt ~ ~ ~ t~ t TOWNSHIP fJF ORC7-MEDONTE REPORT Report No. EES2008-01 To: Committee of the Whole Prepared By: Keith Mathiesan Meeting Date: Subject: Motion # 2008 January 16 , ment d Develo b A Roll #: p ourwoo r (Phase II) -Issuance of R.M.S. File #: Certificate of Substantial Completion and Acceptance D12-3343, v-003 (Aboveground Works) REC(3MMENDATION(S): Requires Action^X For Information Only It is recommended that: 1. THAT Report No. EES2008-01 be received and adopted.. 2. THAT the Township of Oro-Medonte issues the Certificate of Substantial Completion and Acceptance (Aboveground Works} for Arbourwood Estates (Phase II), dated December 14, 2007. 3. THAT the Clerk prepares a By-law for Council's consideration. 4. THAT the Public Works Superintendent be notified of Council's decision. 5. AND THAT the Developer be notified of Council's decision. BAGKGR4UND: The Township of Oro-Medonte entered into a Subdivision Agreement with Arbourwood Estates Ltd. in October, 2002 to construct Phase I1, consisting of seventy-eight (78} lots in the village of Shanty Bay. ANALYSIS: The Developer has now completed top course asphalt on Phase II, consisting of Red Oak Crescent and Basswood Circle. The Township Engineers, Totten Sims Hubicki, are now recommending the issuance of the Certificate of Substantial Completion and Acceptance (Aboveground Works). This will start the two (2) year maintenance period and the Township will now be responsible for the winter maintenance. Engineering and Environmental Services Meeting Date: January 16, 2008 Report No. EES2008-01 Page 1 of 2 FINANGIA~: er maintenance of roads in Phase II. POLICIES/LEGISLATION: CONSULTATIONS: TSH Engineers Architects Planners Township Staff ATTACHMENTS: ' Certificate of Substantial Completion and Acceptance (Aboveground Works} for Arbourwood Estates (Phase II}. CONCLUSION: Res ctfully ~ bmitted: Keith Mathieson, C.R.S.I. Director of Engineering and Environmental Services Engineering and Environmental Services Meeting Date: January 16, 2008 Report No. EES2008-01 Page 2 of 2 ~ ~~~ engineers architec#8 planners TOWNSHIP ENGINEERS CERTIFICATE OF MUNICIPALITY PROJECT DEYE~OPER FILE NO. Descriation of the Works: SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE iABOYEGROUND WORKS} Township of Oro-Medonte Arbourwood Estates Subdivision Phase 2 Ptan 51 M-696 Arbourwood Estates Ltd. Phase II 12-08921-00 tMMA 43T- 92024, Roadways in the Arbounnrood Estates Subdivision Phase 2 consisting of: • Red Oak Crescent westerly from the north end of Walnut Drive, and then southerly and easterly to the south end of Walnut Drive; a distance of 1,420 metres (4,659 feet) • Basswood Circle from Red Oak Crescent to Red Oak Crescent; a distance of 820 metres (2,690 feet) We, Totten Sims Hubicki, notify the Municipality that the above mentioned works were inspected on December 11, 2007 and to the best of our knowledge and judgement, are Complete in accordance with the Subdivision Agreement except for the defiaenaes below: • Curb repair at Lot 90. We hereby accept these works for use and operation by the Municipality subject to the rectacation of the above noted defiaencies and to the rectification of any further defiaenaes that may become apparent during the maintenance period and to the maintenance that is require by the Subdivision Agreement and its Amendment. The date of Substantial Completion and Acceptan ( vegroun orks) is established by the Certificate as of mbar 11, 2t?07. Date: ~G~~ Signature: ~~, K:18921-50V1boveground S.C. ~ A.doc T4WNSNlP OF f~}RO-MEDONTE REPORT Report No. To: Prepared By: EES200$-02 Committee of the Whole Keith Mathieson Meeting Dater Subject: Motion # January 16, 2008 Arbourwood Development Roll #: (Phase 111) -Issuance of R.M.S. File #: Certificate of Substantial Completion and Acceptance D12-3343, v-003 (Aboveground Works) RECOMMENDATION(S): Requires Action~X For Information Only It is recommended that: 1. THAT Report No. EES2008-02 be received and adopted. 2. THAT the Township of Oro-Medonte issues the Certificate of Substantial Completion and Acceptance (Aboveground Works) for Arbourwood Estates (Phase III), dated December 14, 2Q07. 3. THAT the Clerk prepares a By-law for Council's consideration. 4. THAT the Public Works Superintendent be notified of Council's decision. 5. AND THAT the Developer be notified of Council's decision. BACKGROUND: The Township of Oro-Medonte entered into a Subdivision Agreement with Arbourwood Estates Ltd. in January, 2004 to construct Phase III, consisting of nine (9) lots in the village of Shanty Bay. ANALYSIS: The Developer has now completed top course asphalt on Phase III, consisting of Jenna Court and Diane Court. The Township Engineers, Totten Sims Hubicki, are now recommending the issuance of the Certificate of Substantial Completion and Acceptance (Aboveground Works). This will start the two (2) year maintenance period and the Township will now be responsible for the winter maintenance. Engineering and Environmental Services Meeting Date: January 16, 2008 Report No. EES2008-02 Page 1 of 2 FINANCIAL: er maintenance of roads in Phase III. t POLICIESILEGISLATION: CONSULTATIONS: TSH Engineers Architects Planners Township Staff ATTACHMENTS: Certificate of Substantial Completion and Acceptance (Aboveground Works} far Arbourwaod Estates (Phase III). CONCLUSION: n Re~~tfu submitted: p ~Y Keith Mathieson, C.R.S.I. Director of Engineering and Environmental Services C.A.O. Comments: C.A.O. Approval: Date: Engineering and Environmental Services Meeting Date: January 16, 2008 Report No. EES2008-02 Page 2 of 2 ~~~~ engineers architects planners TOWNSHIP ENGINEERS CERTIFICATE OF MUNICIPALITY PROJECT DEVELOPER FILE NO. Description of the Works: SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE ABOVEGROUND WORKS) Township of Oro-Medonte Arbourwood Estates Subdivision Phase 3 ' Plan 51 M-T6T Arbourwood Estates Limited {Phase III) 12.8921-53 {OM T- 94t~4} Roadways in the Arbourwood Estates Subdivision Phase 3 consisting of: Jenna Court southerly ftom Red Oak Crescent, and easterly to a cul-de-sac; a distance of 260 metres (853 feet) Diane Court southerly from Red Oak Crescent to a cui-de-sac; a distance of 16Q metres (525 feet) We, Totten Sims Hubicki, notify the Municipality that the above mentioned works were inspected on December 11, 2007 and to the best of our knowledge and judgement, are complete in accordance with the Subdivision Agreement except for the defiaenaes below: • Nil We hereby accept these works far use and operation by the Municipality subject to the rectification of the above noted deficiencies and to the rectification of any further defiaenaes that may become apparent during the maintenance period and to the maintenance that is require by the Subdivision Agreement and its Amendment. The date of Substantial Completion and Acceptance aground W ) is established by the Certifi to as of De tuber 11, 2007. Date: ~ ~~~~ Signature: K:~8921-531Aboveground S.C. & A.doc C: i ~~ rown~s~~~ ~~ a~a-n~~ac~nrrE ~_ ' REPORT ~- Report No. To: Prepared By: EES2008-03 Committee of the Whole Keith Mathieson Meeting Date: Subject: Motion # January 16, 2008 Sugarbush (Phase III Stage IV Roll #: , -Section "C") -Issuance of R.M.S. File #: Certificate of Substantial Completion and Acceptance L04-12068 (Aboveground Works) RECOMMENDATION(S): Requires Action^X For Information Only It is recommended that: 1. THAT Report No. EES2008-03 be received and adopted. 2. THAT the Township of Oro-Medonte issues the Certificate of Substantial Completion and Acceptance (Aboveground Works) for Sugarbush (Phase III, Stage IV -Section "C"), dated December 14, 2007. 3. THAT the Clerk prepares the appropriate By-law for Council's consideration. 4. THAT the Public Works Superintendent be notified of Council's decision. 5. AND THAT the Developer be notified of Council's decision. BACKGROUND: The Township of Oro-Medonte entered into a Subdivision Agreement with Monica Interior Design Ltd. and Modco Investments Ltd. in June, 2002 to construct the last Phase of the Sugarbush development, consisting of three (3) Sections; Section "C" consists of twenty-two (22) lots on Ironwood Trail and Ash Court. ANALYSIS: As the final course of asphalt has been placed on Ironwood Trail and Ash Court, the Township Engineers, Totten Sims Hubicki, are now recommending the issuance of the Certificate of Substantial Completion and Acceptance (Aboveground Works) dated December 14, 2007, starting the two (2) year maintenance period. During the maintenance period, the Township is responsible for the winter maintenance of the roads. Engineering and Environmental Services Meeting Date: January 16, 2008 Report No. EES2008-03 Page 1 of 2 FINANCIAL: Winter maintenance of the roads. POLICIES/LEGISLATION: CONSULTATIONS: TSH Engineers, Rrchitects, Planners Township staff ATTACHMENTS: ' Certificate of Substantial Completion and Acceptance (Aboveground Works) for Sugarbush (Phase III, Stage IV -Section "C"). CONCLUSION: R pectfuy submitted: Keith Nla iesan, C.R.S.I. Director of Engineering and Environmental Services Engineering and Environmental Services Meeting Date: January 16, 2008 Report No. EES2008-03 Page 2 of 2 ~. ~ ~~~ engineers architects planners TOWNSHIP ENGINEERS CERTIFICATE OF MUNICIPALITY PROJECT DEVELOPER FILE NO. Description of the Works: SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE !ABOVEGROUND WORKSI Township of Oro-Medonte Sugarbush Phase I11, Stage IV -Section "C" Plan 51 M-367, 51 R-28207, 51 R-31153 Monica Interior Design Ltd. and Modco Investments Ltd. 12-8847-50 (MMA 43T-86031) Roadways in the Sugarbush Phase III, Stage IV -Section "C" consisting of Ash Court westerly from 6"' Line to cul-de-sac; a distance of 100 metres {328 feet) Ironwood Trail from Station 0+250 to Station 0+000; a distance of 250 metres (820 feet) We, Totten Sims Hubicki, notify the Municipality that the above mentioned works were inspected on December 11, 2007, and to the best of our knowledge and judgement, are complete in accordance with the Subdivision Agreement except for the deficiencies below: Asphalt shoulder behind curb; Tree planting; As-Constructed Drawings & OLS Certification; We hereby accept these works for use and operation by the Municipality subject to the rectification of the above noted deficiencies and to the rectification of any further deficiencies that may become apparent during the maintenance period and to the maintenance that is require by the Subdivision Agreement and its Amendment. The date of Substantial Completion and Acceptance (Aboveground ks) is established by the Certif to as of D mbe~r(11, 2007. Date: lT ~~~ j~ignature: K:18841-501Aboveground S.C. & A.Phase C.doc ,_~:, i ~ . : r--{ ,. r ~ ~~ x~ TOWNSHIP OF t~RfJ-MEDONTE ~-~ REPC}RT Report No. To: Prepared By: EES2008-04 Committee of the Whole Keith Mathieson Meeting Dater Subject: Motion #' January 16, 2008 Sugarbush (Phase III Sta e IV Roll #: , g -Section "C") -Issuance of R.M.S. File #: Certificate of Maintenance and Final Acceptance L04-12068 (Underground Works) RECOMMENDATION(S): Requires Action^X For Information Only It is recommended that: 1. THAT Report No. EES2008-04 be received and adopted. 2. THAT the Township of Oro-Medonte issues the Certificate of Maintenance and Final Acceptance (Underground Works) for Sugarbush (Phase III, Stage IV -Section "C"), dated December 14, 2007. 3. THAT the Clerk prepares the appropriate By-law far Council's consideration. 4. AND THAT the Developer be notified of Council's decision. BACKGROUND: The Township of Oro-Medonte entered into a Subdivision Agreement with Monica Interior Design Ltd. and Modco Investments Ltd. in June, 2002 to construct the last Phase of the Sugarbush development, consisting of three (3) Sections; Section "C" consists of twenty-two (22) lots on Ironwood Trail and Ash Court. ANALYSIS: The Township Engineers, Totten Sims Hubicki, are now recommending the issuance of the Certificate of Maintenance and Final Acceptance (Underground Works), dated December 14, 2007. FINANCIAL: Engineering and Environmental Services Meeting Date: January 16, 2008 Report No. EES2008-04 Page 1 of 2 POLICIES/LEGISLATION: CONSULTATIONS: TSH Engineers, Architects, Planners Township staff ATTACHMENTS: Certificate of Maintenance and Final Acceptance (Underground Works) for Sugarbush (Phase III, Stage IV -Section "C"). CONCLUSION: t~ Respectfully submitted: Keith Mathieson, C.R.S.1. Director of Engineering and Environmental Services C.A.O. Comments: C.A.O. Approval Date: N' Engineering and Environmental Services Meeting Date: January 16, 2008 Report No. EES2008-04 Page 2 of 2 ~ ~~~ €±ngineers architects planners TOWNSHIP ENGINEERS GERTIFICATE OF MUNICIPALITY PROJEGT DEVELOPER FILE NO. Description of the Works: MAINTENANCE AND FINAL ACCEPTANCE (UNDERGROUND WORKSI Township of Oro-Medonte Suaarbush Phase 111, Stacie IV -Section "C" ' Plan 51 M-367, 51 R-28207.51 R-31153 Monica Interior Design Ltd. and Modco Investments Ltd. 12-$847-50 (MMA 43T-86031) Watermain distribution system and storm drainage works in the Sugarbush Phase III, Stage IV - Section "C". We, Totten Sims Hubicki, notify the Municipality that the above mentioned works were inspected on December 11, 2007, and to the best of our knowledge and judgement, are complete in accordance with the Subdivision Agreement except for the deficiencies below: • Nil We, Totten Sims Hubicki, notify the Municipality that to the best of our knowledge and judgment: 1. The Developer named herein has completed the required maintenance work, has rectified known deficiencies and has fulfilled the other terms of the Subdivision Agreement. 2. The period of maintenance of this Subdivisio cement expir on the issuance of this Certificate. Date: 2~JT Signature: K:\8847-50\Underground M. & F. A.Phase G.doc ,..e ~~ c)RC). `. ~/. r = _. Tt?WNSN/P QF t~Rt"~-MEDGtNTE REP{7RT Report No. To: Committee of the Whole Prepared By: BP 2008-004 Adam Kozlowski, Planner Meeting Dater Subject: Zoning By-law Motion # January 16, 2008 .Amendment 2008-ZBA-01 (Neil McNiven) Roll #: Con 8, N. Pt. of Lot 3 R.M.S. File #: D14 37482. 4346-010-003-35310 2943 Line 7 North; Recommend Public Meeting RECOMMENDATION{S): Requires Action X For Information Only It is recommended: 1. THAT Report BP 2008-001 Re: Zoning By-law Amendment for Neil McNiven, North Part of Lot 3, Concession 8, (Oro), Township of Oro-Medonte, be received. 2. THAT Zoning By-law Amendment Application 2008-ZBA-01, North Part of Lot 3, Concession 8, (Oro), Township of Oro-Medonte, proceed to a Statutory Public Meeting in accordance with the provisions of the Planning Act. BACKGROUND: The purpose of this report is to consider a proposed Zoning By-law Amendment Application submitted by Neil McNiven on January 2, 2008. This rezoning application has been submitted to fulfill a condition of approval for Consent Application 2006-B-18, which was granted by the Committee of Adjustment on August 10, 2006. ANALYSIS: The rezoning application applies to an existing 1 hectare residential lot, severed in 1988, that was conditionally approved by the Committee of Adjustment for "transposition" from the west side of the applicant's land holding to the east side of the property, where the transposed lot is proposed to front on Line 8 North. The subject property currently functions as an agricultural operation, and contains a single detached dwelling with numerous farm-related outbuildings. The lot proposed to be transposed has been vacant since its creation by consent in 1988. As part of provisional approval PLANNING DEPARTMENT Meeting Date January 16, 2008 Report No. BP 2008-001 Page 1 of 6 for .Consent Application 2006-8-18, the applicant must apply for and obtain a rezoning for both the lands proposed to be transposed, and for the "retained".lands where the original lot created in 1988 will subsequently merge with the applicant's overall land ' ~ °~ holding. Thee location of the transposed lot is proposed to be rezoned .from the AgriculturallRural (A(RU} Zone to the Rural Residential Two (RUR2) Zone, and the "retained" lands from where the existing residential lot will merge with the applicapt's overall land holding is proposed to be rezoned from the Rural Residential Two (RUR2) Zone to the Agricultural/Rural (A/RU) Zone (see attached schedule}. No new buildings lots will be created as a result of Consent Application 2006-8-18. ~. FINANCIAL: Not applicable. POLICIES/LEGISLATION: Township of Ora-Medonte Official Plan: The lands subject to the rezoning are designated "Rural" and "Oro Moraine Natural Core/Corridor Area" by the Official Plan. The "Rural" policies of the Official Plan, as contained in Section D2.2.2 state that boundary adjustments may be permitted provided that the viability of agricultural operations on the subject or surrounding lands are not compromised; that the boundary adjustment complies with relevant zoning provisions, and that no new building lot is created. For the purpose of this Zoning By-law Amendment application, the existing residential lot is being relocated from the south- west to the north-east corner of the applicant's overall land holdings; as such, no "new" lot is being created, only relocated. As well, the proposed relocation of the existing lot boundaries will not hinder surrounding agricultural operations as a result of Minimum Distance Separation Formulae, and will maintain the minimum requirements as prescribed by the Zoning By-law. With respect to the Oro Moraine Natural Core/Corridor Area designation, it was determined that aProvincially-Significant Wetland, being the East Coulson Swamp, is located .immediately to the east across Line 8 North from the proposed location of the transposed lat. The County of Simcoe requested that the applicant complete an Environmental Impact Study (EIS) to determine if there would be any environmental impacts or constraints with respect to the relocation of the existing lot and any future development on these lands. The Committee of Adjustment approved the consent application without the EIS being completed, and did not impose the completion of an EIS as a condition of provisional consent. The County subsequently appealed the decision to the Ontario Municipal Board. The EIS was later completed by the applicant, to the satisfaction of the County, and the appeal to the OMB was withdrawn. While the lands to which the existing lot is to be relocated contains mature tree cover and slopes gently from west to east, none of the wetland features of the East Coulson Swamp are located on the lands subject to this rezoning PANNING DEPARTMENT Meeting Date January 16, 2008 Report No. BP 2008-001. Page 2 of 6 >-° Zoning By-law 97-95: The Zoning By-law Amendment Application will rezone the lands currently containing the 0.98 hectare residential lot from the Rural Residential Two (RUR2) Zone to the Agricultural/Rural (A/RU) Zone, and rezone the proposed new location of the same residential lot from the Agricultural/Rural (A/RU) Zone to the Rural Residential Two (RUR2) Zone to accurately reflect the intended. residential use of the property. The lot will have a frontage along Line 8 North of 60 metres, and an area of 1 hectare. These dimensions are in keeping with the requirement of the RUR2 Zone, where the minimum frontage required is 45 metres, and the minimum lot area far a residential. use is 0.4 hectares. CONSULTATIONS: As discussed above, the County of Simcoe was circulated Consent Application 2006-B- 18: The County requested that the applicant complete an EIS to address environmental concerns .due to proximity of the East Coulson Swamp. The County appealed the decision of Committee to approve the lot transposition, and subsequently withdrew the appeal when the applicant completed the EIS. ATTACHMENTS: Schedule 1: Location Map Schedule 2: Rezoning Proposal CONCLUSION: Staff received the Zoning By-law Amendment Application on January 2, 2008. It should be noted that the Conditions of Consent for Application 2006-B-18 must be fulfilled on or before March 8, 2008, otherwise the application will lapse. Staff has made the applicant aware of the limited time frame to fulfill the conditions of consent, and have since been working with the applicant to expedite the clearance of conditions. It is therefore appropriate for Zoning By-law Amendment Application 2008-ZBA-01 to proceed to a statutory Public Meeting at this time. Respectfully submitted: I~am Kozlowski Planner Reviewed by: Gienn White, MCIP, RPP Senior Planner PANNING DEPARTMENT Meeting Date January 16, 2008 Report No. BP 2008-001 Page 3 of 6 Department Head Comments: Department Head Approval: - Date: C.A.O. Comments: C.A.O. Approval: ~ Date: PLANNING DEPARTMENT Meeting Date January 16, 2008 Report No. BP 2008-001 Page 4 of 6 SCHEDULE 1: LOCATION MAP 2008-ZBA-01 (McNiven) MILL POND.. --~ -- - ~ ~- - - ~_ - <o ~ u~ w -_1 - z -- Z -- -- - ti _- J J 1 ---1Z J -- --- -~- - ~~ ____ ~,,: HORSESHOE.VALLEY o°-' - ~~ ~ ELI ~ L _ ~~~~~~'c BROW ~ ~ ---- ,~ ~ , ANWOOD ' ~,~~ t -~ s 11 ~' ~ UG } r i ,o ONEIDA ~~ RBUS y w !~~ ~~~ ... ~ Z ~ ~ _,I~ I ~~ y_~ ~ ~_,`.. I SUBJECT LANDS _ _.__._ ~' --- - ~- BASS LAKE - - ~ - ,~- ,_ -__ / ~ - - ~~,-i~~~A - SS LgKE - - ____-~ ~_~ ti ~ ~~ -__ w _ i -" ~ ~ _- -- ~ IL Z ~ ~ J ~__ __ , Z - J ~ ~- w PLANNING DEPARTMENT Meeting Date January 16, 2008 Report No. BP 2008-001 Page 5 of 6 SCHEDULE 2: REZONING PROPOSAL 2008-ZBA-01 (McNiven) ~ ~~ w z w' z 2943 Line 7 North ~ ~ _ _ _ _ _ AtRU ZONE .- " "" Proposed "new location" "~ for existing residential lot .. to be rezoned from AlRU Zone ~ ~ to RUR2 Zone Existing Residential Lot Rezone from RUR2 to A/RU Zone Property to merge with 2943 Line 7 North PLANNING DEPARTMENT Meeting Date January 16, 2008 Report No. BP 2008-001 Page 6 of 6