The URL can be used to link to this page

2007-126 By-law to Adopt Amendment No. 24 to the Official PlanBeing a By-law to Adopt Amendment No. 24 to the Official Plan WHEREAS The Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte is empowered to Amend its Official Plan as required; AND WHEREAS the process for considering such an Amendment was in accordance with Section 17 and 21 of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990 c.P 13. AND WHEREAS the amendments to the Official Plan are deemed to be appropriate and in the public interest: NOW THEREFORE it is resolved that: 1. Amendment Number 24 to the Official Plan, attached hereto as Schedule 'A-1 and forming part of this By-Law, is hereby adopted and; 2. This by-law shall come into force and take effect as specified in the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P. 13. BY-LAW READ A FIRST AND SECOND TIME THIS 14TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2007. BY-LAW READ A THIRD TIME AND FINALLY PASSED THIS 14TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2007. J. Udlis Irwin Schedule Official Plan Amendment 24 Township of Oro - Medonte This is Schedule 'A -1' to By -Law No. 2007 -126 passed the 14th day of November, 2007. A ghes erk, J. C las Irwin SCHEDULE 'A' OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT No. 24 TOWNSHIP OF ORO— MEDONTE ORIGINAL ROAD ALLOWANCE BETWEEN LOTS 25 AND 26 (SPRINGNOME ROAD) 1,15918,5DE 355AJm A >O s � m m • LANDS TO BE REDESIGNATED TO "SHORELINE. LANDS TO BE REDESIGNATED TO _ "ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ONE" 1EBOUNDARY OF SUBJECT LANDS South side of Springhome Road Part of Lot 26, Concession 9 (Oro) 1,15B'0 VE 1f4.0m � E _ A m • LANDS TO BE REDESIGNATED TO "SHORELINE. LANDS TO BE REDESIGNATED TO _ "ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ONE" 1EBOUNDARY OF SUBJECT LANDS South side of Springhome Road Part of Lot 26, Concession 9 (Oro) r • Reference: � a Part Lot 26, Concession IX (Oro) November 2007 AMENDMENT NO. 24 TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE The Constitutional Statement 1 PART A -THE PREAMBLE 2 1.0 Purpose 2 2.0 Location 2 3.0 Basis 2 PART B - THE AMENDMENT 3 1.0 Introduction 3 2.0 Details of the Amendment 3.0 Schedule "A" of the Amendment 3 PART C — THE APPENDICES 1.0 Record of Public Meeting — Township of Oro-Medonte 2.0 Planning Background Report, Revised November 2007 —Skelton, Brumwell & Associates Inc. 2 AMENDMENT NO. 24 TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE The following Amendment to the Official Plan of the Township of Oro-Medonte consists of three parts, Part A - The Preamble - consists of the purpose, location and basis for the Amendment and does not constitute part of the actual Amendment. Part B - The Amendment - which sets out the actual amendment and consists of Schedule 'A', and explanatory text and constitutes Amendment No.24 to the Official Plan of the Township of Oro- Medonte. Part C - The Appendices - consists of information pertinent to this Amendment in the form of background information. This section does not constitute part of the actual Amendment. PART A - THE PREAMBLE: 1.0 PURPOSE The purpose of this Official Plan Amendment is to change the designation of certain lands in ' the Township of Oro-Medonte, from the "Rural" and "RuraF with "Environmental Protection Two" overlay designations oo the ^Shore|ine^ and "Environmental Protection One" designations. The redesignation will permit the development of six (6) infill residential lots and will identify and protect significant natural heritage features. 2.0 LOCATION The subject lands are located on the south side of Road and are show on ' Schedula"A"a8anhed. The lands affected by this Amendment are described ao Part of Lot 2O.Connession|X.(Oro)Tbwnmhipo/Dro+Kedonhe. The subject property /e included /n Schedule ^A^of the Township ofOro-Kedon&e Official Plan. 3.0 BASIS An application to amend the Official Plan 0o permit the creation of seven (7) lots from m 71 huc�repropedy was nubmiVedin20O4. The requested amendment wmuNredesignated '' the entire property from the "Rural" and "Rural" with "Environmental Protection Two" overlay designations to^8hnno|ine''topermit the proposed in8U development byconsent. In response to the comments of the Township and the Lake Simcoa Region Conservation Authority, an "Environmental Site Assessment", a "Hydrogeological Update Report" and "Planning Background Report" were prepared. Based on the recommendations ofthese reports, the number of lots was reduced to six (6), and the extent of development has been limited to the area outside of the significant natural heritage features and appropriate buffers. Further discussion between the applicant and the Conservation Authority, and consideration by the Township resulted in the lot configuration represented on the attached Schedule "A". The proposed residential development is compatible in scale and density with the existing shoreline residential development adjacent Vo and in the vicinity of the site. The proposed lots can be adequately serviced with private water supplies and sewage disposal systems with no negative impact nn existing wells nr groundwater quality orquantity. The redesignation of the significant natural heritage features identified through the Environmental Site Assessment will ensure their protection. The proposed amendment iuconsistent with the Provincial Policy Statement, 2005 and in conformity with the County ofSkncoe Official Plan. Council isof the opinion that the proposed amendment provides for appropriate infill development and is consistent with the 4 Policies • the Township • Oro-Medonte Official P1 0 as. The proposed development and redesignation of the property are discussed in Part C, "Planning Background Report" which provides the planning background to the amendment. PART B - THE AMENDMENT 1.0 INTRODUCTION All of this part of the document entitled Part B - The Amendment which consists of the attached Schedule "A" constitutes Amendment No.24 to the Official Plan of the Township of Oro-Medonte. 2.0 DETAILS OF THE AMENDMENT Schedule "A" Land Use Plan to the Official Plan of the Township of Oro-Medonte, is amended by redesignating the lands described as Part of Lot 26, Concession IX (Oro) and identified on Schedule "A" attached from "Rural" and "Rural" with "Environmental Protection Two" overlay designations to the "Shoreline" and "Environmental Protection One" designations. PART C — THE APPENDICES The following Appendices do not constitute part of the Amendment but are included as supporting information. LANDS TO BE REDESIGNATED TO "SHORELINE" LANDS T0 BE REDESIGNATED TO '[NwROwwEwTAL PROTECTION Ow[^ BOUNDARY OF SUBJECT LANDS APPENDIX 1.0 MINUTES OF PUBLIC MEETING PUBLIC MEETING MINUTES Re: Proposed Amendments to the Official Plan and Zoning By-Law Application Nos. 2004-OPA-03 & 2004-ZBA-04, Concession 9, Part of Lot 26 (formerly Oro), Township of Oro-Medonte (CRA Developments) January 17, 2005 @ 7:07 p.m. at the Municipal Council Chambers of the Township of T Present: Mayor J. Neil Craig r,�"j C, 71 Deputy Mayor Harry Hughes Councillor Dan Buttineau Councillor Ralph Hough FEB 0 2' 200C Councillor Paul Marshall Councillor John Crawford Councillor Ruth Fountain Staff Present: Andria Leigh, Director of Planning; Jennifer Zieleniewski, Administrative Officer; Doug Irwin, Records Management Coordinator Also Present: Bob Barlow, Craig Drury, John Miller, Mel Coutanche, Mark Edwards, Debbie Lund, Rosemary Sage, Robert & Heather MacGregor, Lester & Cristina Cooke, Tim & Ilene Crawford, Bengt Schumacher, Stephen Ball, Horst Ries, Nick Castellani, Brad Wolfenden Mayor J. Neil Craig called the meeting to order and explained the public meeting is to obtain public comments on proposed amendments to the Official Plan and Zoning By-Law. Notice of the Public Meeting was mailed to landowners within 120m of the specified site on December 21, 2004 and posted on a sign on the subject property on December 22, 2004. The following correspondence was received at the meeting: Colin Costello dated December 29, 2004, Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority dated January 12, 2005, The Corporation of the County of Simcoe dated January 11, 2005. Andria Leigh, Director of Planning, provided an overview of the proposed amendments to the Official Plan and Zoning By-Law. The following persons offered verbal comments with respect to the proposed amendments to the Official Plan and Zoning By-Law: Mark Edwards, Robert MacGregor, Nick Castellani, Brad Wolfenden, Debbie Lund. The Mayor advised that written submission will be received at the Township office until February 15, 2005. There being no further comments or questions, the meeting adjourned at 7:28 p.m. A tape of the meeting is available for review at the Township Administration Centre, 148 Line 7 South. December 29, 2004 To Whom It May Concern: REUEN-E-D-] JAN a 3 2005 0 0. RO-MrDONTE To T WNSHIP I wish to be kept informed regarding the decision of the Township of Oro-Medonte in respect to the proposed Official Plan & Zoning By-law Amendments, under Sections 17 & 34 of the Planning Act, R.S.Q. 1990 c. P. 13. The amendment would redesignate lands described as Concession 9, Part of Lot 26 from Rural and Environmental Protection Two Overlay Designation to the Shoreline & Environmental Protection Two Overlay Designation to allow for The creation of seven new residential lots. Please forward all correspondence to my residence. Mr. Colin Costello RR2 181 Springhome Road Hawkesione, ON LOL ITO Tel- 905 -695 -1281 1-800 -45 -0437 Faaa 905 853 -3881 S- MaL:�nfa(rblarcA on ca Web: awa•.lsrca.or►.ca Sent by Facsimile January 12, 2005 1- 705487 -0133 Ms, Andrea Leigh, Senior Planner Township of Oro- Medonte PO Box 100 Oro, ON LOL 2x0 Dear Ms, Leigh: 120 Bayview Parkway Re: Application For Zoning By -law & Box 282 Newmarket, Ontario Lot 26, Concession 9 i3Y 4x1 Township of Oro - Medonte V0. 532 ), 1 AN 1 2 X005 File No.: 2004- ZHA-04 & 2004 -OP -04 IMS File NO.:PZOC344C2 & P0FCI$5 Plan Amendment Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authori (LSRCA) staff have received and reviewed the "Environmental Impact Study" by Skelton iumwell, dated July 29, 2004 and the "Update of Preliminary Hydro geologic Evaluation ", b Ian D. Wilson and Associates dated August 12, 2001 in support ot'this application and offer the following comurenrs in this regard: LSRCA staffnote that the subject area Township Official Plan. As per Figur within the Environmental Protection the lot lines for lots 1 -5 be adjusted to e LSRCA staff also recommend that all restrictive zoning that protects them fr( or open space), s identified as "Significant Woodlands" within the 5 of the report, lots 1 through 5 are to be created 3P) zone. It is recommended by LSRCA staff that asure no encroachment occurs within the EP zone. buffers and undisturbed areas should remain in a M incompatible uses. (ie, environmental protection 2. Section 5 identifies potential impacts f the proposed development, which include losses Of vegetation and habitat, soil erosio and an increase in surface runoff. As such, the conclusion in Section 7, "that ther will be no negative impact ", appears to be contradictory. The report should be re ised to address how these impacts will be avoided or mitigated. 3. Please mote that as per section 5.0 of the watercourse is to be maintained Occur. Please provide details as to W;2tershed rational for such a buffer. As identifi is traversed by several identified wate buffer. It is Authority policy to require POT Life (60 M total) for a cold watercourse an incorporated as part of the develo illustrating all watercourses on site w e report, the recanirnended 30 metre buffer (from ensure no negative impacts to the watercourse >w the 30 rneter buffer was established and the I in out letter dated June 29, 2004, the subject lot 'nurse that have not been afforded an appropriate n undisturbed vegetative buffer strip of 30 metres 15 metres (30 M total) for a warm watercourse be nent proposal. Please provide a revised plan i appropriate buffers. 4. If the intention is to stay with the curr t design, be advised that the proponent will n to prove that these watercourses are n ither direct nor in- direct fish habitat. This may be ee difficult to prove as these waterco es feed Lake Simcoe directly. Any study must include spring and summer electro -fis ing; surnrner water and air temperatures and some for of assessment as to groundwate in form to the site. Page 1 of 3 January 12, 2005 File No.: 2004- ZBA -04 & 2004 -OP-04 IMS No.: PZOC344C2 & POFC185 Mrs. Andrea Leigh Page 2 of 3 5. The absence of stream flow as reported proposed lots 1 and 4 is not sufficit ephemeral stream. The "significant t soils quoted from the 1987 investigate site indicate that groundwater disch Hydrological study should confirm the the portion of the site proposed for lots development proposal. Given the significant forest designat: function of this site should be provid endangered Henslow's Sparrow. A, I breeding season (generally from AAp: this report should include a list of s EIS should be revised to include this and mitigation if necessary. IV �jz Z late July within the two tributaries that intersect information to discount the presence of an �e flow" reported for the main tributary, sandy and discharging gradients in the vicinity of the is likely feeding the on -site stream(s). The esence or absence of groundwater discharge on d, if present, address this issue in the report and of the property an assessment of the breeding bird particularly as the NHIC indicates a record of the ding bird survey should be undertaken during the o June depending on spring weather conditions); ies, method, dates and tinges of field visits.. The i as well as the potential impacts on this function 7. Please provide a plant list of the co unities described in Section 2,4, concentrating on the area proposed for clearing, This ist should be checked with the Natural Heritage Information Centre (NHIQ for the pr sence of any provincially significant species and with the Riley (1989) list for any regi tally rare species. S. The area proposed for clearing shout be surveyed for the presence of the endangered Butternut (Juglans cinerea) and for y other specimen (i.e., old growth) trees. These trees should be flagged and their loca on identified in the mapping. Every effort should be made to avoid these specimens ifpo Bible, the EIS should address any impacts on these features. 9. Given the diversity of habitat on site described in Sectioli 2, amphibiau habitat should be considered. As such, please cond ct an assessment of breeding, summer and over - wintering amphibian habitat. This is ost efficiently achieved through an appropriately tinned amphibian breeding survey. 10. Please provide a list of other incid tal wildlife observations and comment on any potential impacts and offer mitigatio if required. January 12, 2005 File No.: 2004- ZBA -04 & 2004 -OP -04 lMS No.: PZOC344C2 & POFC1 85 Mrs. Andrea Leigh Page 3 of 3 11. Please note that for future EIS s', the Natural Resource's Ecological Land describing vegetation communities. W. �Jz 3 mty recOmmends the use of the Ministry of fieation Syste'n (ELC) when identifying and 12. Section 5.0 of the report recommend the use of a storruwater management facility to ensure no negative impacts to water q ality occur. As such, LSRCA statfwill require the following information to address wat quality and quantity: a) A Stormwater Management quality protection in accord requirements will be achiev, b) An erosion and sediment implemented before, during sedimentation. c) Analysis of any resulting site described by the veg, Once this information has been submitted position on this matter. I trust this meets you processing of this file, please reference the If you have any questions, regarding the sa contact the undersigned at 905- 895 -1281, e: hF--Z4-- Craig Cooper Environmental Planner CC /ph c. Tim Crawford, Owner, By Mall Geoffrey Rether, Ian D. Wilson & Trudy Patterson, Skelton Brumwell S:'CMi9CtiZ0ne- Bylawsl0r0 Medonte12002- 2004 %1 t detailing how atormwater quantity control and with Ministry of the Environment "Enhanced" 'ol plan detailing the measures that will be after construction to minimize soil erosion and : on the hydrology of the wetland adjacent to the communities in Section 2.4. �or review, we will be able to further assess our requirements at this time. In order to facilitate our )ove noted file numbers in future correspondence. )e of the additional work identified above, please t. 288. ociates, 1 -519- 233 -3501 - Fax .Associates, 1- 705- 726 -0331 - Fax .wpd January 28, 2005 Oro Medonte Township 148 Line 7 South Oro, Ontario LOL 2XO Attention: Marilyn Pennycook, Clerk I am writing to expand on my statements at the council meeting of Monday January 17, 2005. RM-%§ '-"_--- VED7 FFH 0 2 2005 ORO-MEDONTE TO NSHIP It regards the proposed rezoning of the property adjacent to ours at 14 Memorial Crescent. As I stated at the meeting, it is not my intention to oppose the development, but I would like to see a buffer area between the new development and our property. I believe that this would be beneficial to both us and the new prospective property owners. When my wife and I purchased our property, we were made aware that under the present zoning that no development could take place. We value our privacy so much so that we purchased the building lot located to the east of our property and went through the committee of adjustments to sever the lot with our neighbors. If there was a fifty foot frontage parcel of land set aside adjacent to our west property line it would still leave a total of one thousand feet on which the developer could place his seven lots. This would only decrease each lot width by less than eight feet. I would hope that the developer would consider this as a possibility since this would also make the Most undesirable lot more sellable to his prospective buyer. As I also stated, I would not be adverse to taking this up directly with the developer, but I do not know if he will be advised of my comments. 0 2 46 I am aware that there are other hurdles to pass before the rezoning becomes a reality and I would like to be kept appraised of the progress and if my concerns are going to be addressed. Any information that can be forwarded to me would be greatly appreciated. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, Robert MacGregor R.R. #3, Comp. 156 14 Memorial Cres. Oro Station, Ontario LOL 2E0 (705)487-3104 r Dc:r 2 2 1 L� �' Ic 34 NOTICE OF PUBLIC NIEETING FOR PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN AND ZONING BY-LAW OF TTIE, TOWNSHIP OF ORO-.MEDONTE 2004-OPA-03 & 2004-ZBA-04 TAKE NOTICE that tlic Council of the Corporation of the Township of Oro-Mcdonte will hold a Public Meeting on Monday., .1 anuar-y 17, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. in the Municipal Council Chambers- The Purpose of the public meeting is to obtain public Comments on proposed amendments to the Official Plan and to the Zoning By-law. under Sections 17 & 34 of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990 C. P. 13. THE PROPOSED official Plan Amendment would redesignate the lands described as Concession 9, Part of Lot 26 (formerly Within the Township of Oro). The subject lands are proposed to be redesignated from the Rural and Environmental Protection Two Overlay Designation to the Shoreline & Environmental Protection Two Overlay Designation. The purpose of the amendment would be to allow for the creation of seven new residential lots. THE PROPOSED Zoning By-law Amendment would rezone the lands described as Concession 9, Part of Lot 26 (formerly within the Township of Oro). The subject lands arc proposed to be rezoned from the Agricultural/Rural (A✓RU) Zone to the Shoreline Residential (SR) Zone. A KEY MAP for Files 2004-OPA-03 & 2004-7-BA-04 is provided below. ANY PERSON may attend the public meeting and/or make written or verbal representation either in support of or in opposition to the proposed Amendments. If a per on or public body that files an appeal of a decision of the Township of Oro-Mcdonte in respect of the proposed Amendments does not make oral submission at the public meeting or make written submissions to the Township before the proposed Amendments are adopted. the Ontario Municipal Board may dismiss all or part of the appeal. If VOD wish to be notified of the decision of the Township of Oro-Medonte in respect to the proposed official plan & Zoning By-law Amendments, YOU must make a written roquest, to the address below, WRIT-1'1-,,N SUBINUSSIONS should be directed to: u Fit I P I. I X Township of Oro-Medonte N0 (10MMENT 11 Th 148 Line 7 South , r . ILIA, Cntwy in .ii vio,vpai P.O. Box 100, Oro, Ontario LOL 2X0 Attn: Marilyn Pennycook, Clerk ADDITTONAL INFORMATION relating to the proposed Amendments is available for inspection between 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. at the Township of Oro-Medonte Administration Building. For further information, contact the Planning Department at 705-437 -2;71. DATED at die Township of Oro-Medolue this 22-6 day of December 2004. � 10 Andria Leigh. Senior Plan 4r I APPENDIX 2.0 PANNING BACKGROUND REPORT REVISED NOVEMBER 20007 PLANNING BACKGROUND CRAWFORD CONSENT TOWNSHIP OF ORO- MEDONTE Revised November G, 2007 PLANNING BACKGROUND REPORT CRAWFORD CONSENT TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE P/N 04-1892 January 26, 2007 Revised November 6, 2007 Prepared by: Skelton, Brurnwell & Associates Inc. 93 Bell Farm Road, Suite 107 Barrie, Ontario IAM 5GI Telephone: (705) 726-1141 FAX: (705) 726-0331 E -mail: iiiaii(ti sl<elto,)[)I'Lilll\vclj.ciI Prepared for: Tim and Ilene Crawford 1.0 BACKGROUND . , ....... Page FigureI - Location ............................. ............................... l 2 2.0 PHYSICAL CONTEXT ......... . 2.1 Topography and Soils .................... ............................... 3 2.2 Natural Heritage Resources ....... 4 ... ............................... 3.0 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ................... ............................... 5 Figure 2a - Preliminary Lot Development Plan ....... ............................... 6 4.0 PLANNING CON'T'EXT ................ . 4.1 Provincial Policy Statement ........................ . 4.2 Places to Grow Act ........ . ....................... 4.3 County of Simcoe Official Plan 7 .................. 4.4 The 'Township of Oro- Medonte Official Plan .............................. . .. 8 Figure 3 - Official Plan Designation ......... ............................... 9 4.5 Zoning....... ........ ........................ ................ 14 Figure 4- Zoning ....................... ............................... 15 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ........ . REFERENCES............................... ............................... 18 Appendix A LSRCA Correspondence October 15, 2007 Appendix B Hydrogeological Update CRAWFORD CONSENT TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE P/N 04-1892 1.0 BACKGROUND November b'2O07 Mr. & Mrs. Tim Crawford submitted applications Nthe Township of0r*Mrdontein204 for amendments to the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to pcnni\ development of their 7.1 bouiocc property located on the South side of Springhome Road in the Township of Oro-Medonte, as shown on Figure I - Location, for 7 residential lots. 0n June 8,2004 report No. PD2O04-27/ was presented to Planning Committee regarding the applications by Nick McDonald, Planning Consultant for the Township. The report referenced Draft OPA No. 17 indicating that the proposed developrnent is in conformity with three of the four criteria' as a "logical location" for additional shoreline development because: the size and location of the lots are 000qpa1ih)c with the scale and density of the existing development north of Springhome Road; 0 the only method of servicing is by private wells and septic systems; and Memorial Park is located nearby providing new residents access to tile lake. The report also Concluded that an Environmental Impact Study was necessary because the lands are wooded, within the "Environmental Protection Two" designation and near a watercourse. As well, an Updated hydrogeological nudvrclutiv000potenda|impooksoo|oou}watexnuppUcsvvumnecdcd. Subject to Submission u[these reports, a Public Meeting was required to be scheduled for the Planning 8ockgmomUReport Skc}xm.Bmnn,oU& Associates Crawford Consent Inc. November 6, 2007 P/N 04-1892 '`�r� " . .,%° , .•�'�� -` ,� Fes,„„•,` F r t` � SIN jr r - y' p r' E 201 x 27 SITE ` j,�♦ °s =� ,71 �%!fl 4Ji aiil�lOif� _ia.. `�.� /// 4t pit.. ,✓� % �! V, CRAWFORD LOTS ORO— MEDONTE s 4 FIGURE 1 LOCATION N. T. S r P � N 1892 SEPT 2006 �E.1llt".T BAY � .rF ® Skelton Bmmwa AQ 15: I O C (ATE 3 (_ N� CONSULTING ENGINEERS 8c PLANNERS SOURCE: M.I.C. COUNTY ROAD MAP, SIMCOE NORTHEAST. ea sui 1CLfPH(HE FAlR]OM y ) e c7�2n 6 -, ,l suc ion (]p 5) o7nAwIa uu xi i Based on this Report, Mr. and &Yry. Crawford retained Skelton, BrunmweU 6b Associates Dnc. in prepare the required Environmental Impact Study, and Wilson /\mmooiuteu Ltd. to prepare the Hydrogeological update, These reports were submitted in 2004. 1 A9uhic Meeting cm the applications was held cm January /7,2005. Two written submissions were provided o1 comments from the Lake 3imooc Region Conservation Authority (L3ACA). Following extensive consultation with the L8DCAand the Township, the Environmental Impact Study has been revised in accordance with LSRCA's comments, and the final report ' provided to the LSRCA December 7, 20W. Written Submissions from residents requested that they be kept informed of decisions regarding the applications, One n[ the residents, who lives adjacent to the east limit ofUe site, requested that o 50 foot wide area be set aside adjacent to his lot for privacy. This report describes the physical and planning contexts of the proposed development and provides planningitistification b` the applications. 2.0 PHYSICAL CONTEXT 2.1 Topography and Soils The subject property is u vacant, primarily [hrca|cd` parcel in Part nf Lot 26` Concession 9` in the geographic Township ofOro. The site is located in the Sinncoc Lowlands, Lake 8hncoc Basin ohvni o region which inthis area iadescribed aso narrow LOUldery terrace confined byo low bluff. The topography is flat to gently rolling sloping generally from north to South. The identifies the soils in this area as Guerin sandy loam, phase, with imperfect druinugccbarmoVziuboxduek//e!udvc|vOut topography. Soils investigation by Skelton, BmmweU& Associates Inc. in|987concluded that the surface soils on the subject lands are sand m sandy silt m silty clay. Planning Background xcpvn Crawford Consent sk'|mn.8mn�cU& Associates Inc, P/N 04 1892 3 November 6, 2007 2.2 Natural Heritage Resources The Environmental bnouoi Study, December 0` 2006 identifies the presence of Significant Woodlands, Significant Wildlife Habitat related k`the Yellow-Breasted Chat, uupccksnfconcern, and aquatic features that contribute N cold water fisheries adjacent to the site as i|ustrated on Figure 5 of that report. The Study recommends: 50 metre buffer around the Significant Wildlife Habitat, ~ )0 metre buffers from all watercourses; ° limiting disturbance to the Significant Woodlands to approximately 0.71 acres (0,27 ha); ^ all lands south of the development area should be zoned to Environmental Protection and transferred to the municipality or attached to one lot; and stake and survey all buffers for future individual site plans. The report also provides u number nfsuggested nihgudnn measures to be implemented during construction and by home owners on an ongoing basis. Provided the recommendations and mitigation ineasures are implemented, the report concludes that the proposed development will result in on significant impacts on natural heritage features and functions on the subject and/or adjacent lands. L8DC&`x final comment and acceptance nfUhc development concept dated October 15, 2807 is included as Appendix A. Planning Daukgf'^ondReport Crawford Consent Skelton, Bmmnc||& Associates Inc. P/N 04-1892 4 N^vcmber6.2007 . 3.0 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT . ' The original development proposal was b) divide the entire 7.1 hectare property 6v Consent into 7 |No with areas ranging from 0.54 to 12 hectares, As m result of the recurnmnndations'ofdn Environmental Impact Study, the limit of development, designation and zoning was established. the Preliminary Lot Development }Yuo. Figure 2o, was prepared hw*cd on extensive review and discussion with LSKC/\ and the municipal Planning Advisory Committee,. The P|uo ioo|udca O rectangular lots ranging in area from 0.54 to 0.68 hectares, with an average lot area of 0.57 hectares, and one 3.78 ha block encompassing the natural heritage features. The block will remain undeveloped and may be transferred to the Township of Oro-Medonte, or be included with Lot 1. Part of the buffer around the natural beck/gc features will be included in Lots! l, 2 and 3, but development will be prohibited in this area through designation, zoning, and Site Plan Approval. All o[ the lots will front on and have access toSnrincbnnxe Road, u municipal road that iumaintained year round. There are nu municipal vvairrmuno|yorsaoiturvacp/croyobeosintbe vicinity of the site, and all existing lots will have private wells and sewage treatment systems. Given the small number of lots proposed, communal servicing is not feasible. Therefore, the proposed lots will have individual services consistent with the neighbourhood. Figure 2u- Preliminary Lot Development Plan shows the building envelopes un each lot along with typical building sites and areas for the sewage disposal system, Development of the lots will be subject to municipal Site Plan Approval. All servicing systems must he installed in accordance with current standards and legislation, and are subject 1oTownship approval. ln response io the comments of the adjacent resident, the easterly side yard o[7.J metres (24.6feet) as required abutting Mcouoiu| Crescent be extended adjacent to the lot. The zoning provisions require a].0 metres (9.8feet) for an interior side yard, therefore an additional 4.5 metres O4.8feet) is provided adjacent to this lot. This setback will be reflected in the zoning by-law for the site. The Hydrogeological Update report, included uo Appendix B, has established that the lots can be serviced with private uyakensnddhoutuoudvccxcc[feut000Uhcrwuteraopp|ynyoKxnoo,1bcguu|ih/ or quantity of groundwater. Planning Background Report Skelton, 8mnnvcU&A�nciu�oInc. Crawford Consent P/N 04-1892 5 November V 2007 ' PROPERTY BOUNDARY `jIGNI(ICANT Wit )l IF[ IW -3ITAI cYFLL«W f3I�I AK >,f D CHAT) CRAWFORD LOTS 1 PROPOSED LOT LINES " WATERCOURSES (f ISH HABITAT) ORO MEDONTE SfGNIEICANI WILQLIFE (� IYPICAL RESIDENCE f3I HA CAT BO[ f l.R ILLUSTRATION OF 0.6ha WARKOUL "E Fjtgf ER Lt)T CONFIGURAHON 1: 2000 LOT SIZES X TYPICAL SEWAGI BED P/N 1892 r1EV ocT z, zoos Lot 1 -6 0.601-1© © Skelton Bramwell HOCK 3"A 1) a F ONSULTING ENGINEERS & PLANNERS Df ti FARM ROAD SUf[F , 167 BARK . ONfARK) 14M SGt EPHOW (]OS) 726 - 1141 1'A%. ('!t)S} 126 -0331 4~0 PLANNING CONTEXT 4.1 Provincial Policy Statement The proposed limited development on private water and sewage disposal services iocnnai ' with Provincial Pn/icvJYuuvoexy(PPS) because bia appropriate to the existing municipal infrastructure of the municipal road. No expansion of municipal services is required'. There are no issues with the proposed development relative io good agricultural land, agricultural uses, mmineral resources. The development has been designed to protect natural heritage features oo and adjacent 1u the site. Provided the development proceeds io compliance with all applicable legislation and in accordance with the recomniendations of the EIS it will have no negative impuot on water quality and quantity or the natural hcr1u8c features n[ the site. ' Therc are no known cultural heritage resources oothe sib. 4.2 Places to Grow Act The Official Plan and Zoning amendment applications were submitted io2OU4, and therefore' ^cornmenced" h the June |6, 2006 when the "Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, 2OO6" came into effect. ln accordance with Ontario Regulation 3l|/06' amended toO.Bc&.342/0h` these applications may proceed as if the Growth Plan had not come into effect6. 4.3 County of Simcoe Official Plan The site is designated as "Rural and Agricultural" in the Simcoe County Official Plan which perinits residential lots created byconsent provided the lots are restricted insize to conserve lands for environmental purposes. Infill development in areas where there are existing non-farni lots may be appropriate'. The policies also state that there should be no lot creation adjacent to settlement areas or other areas of "Country Residential" development where the total number of lots would exceed 40, uu|cax there is a comprehensive review by the municipality relative to the need for and cumulative effects of additional lntmv Recent review and amendments 1u the Oro-&4edootcOfficial Plan, approved by the County of Simcoe, allow for limited expansion of the Shoreline designation uu described below. Planning Background Report Skelton, Dmm°oU�Asa��u�oCrawford Consent Inc, P/N 04-1892 7 November 6, 2007 The identification and protection of the natural heritage features of the site is in conformity with the goal of the Official Plan N protect, conserve and enhance the County's natural leritage'.Policy Section 3.3.14 states that areas of environmental constraint, such as provincially significant wctands. flood oluinm, and hazardous slopes should be identified as separate blocks in public ownership oc attached 10 one lot. The Preliminary Lot Development Plan includes the environmental fcu(urcm, the water courses and significant wildlife habitat within Block 7. As noted above, Block 7 will be transferred (o the Township or joined to Lot \. Block 7 and the portion of the buffers udiaocn{ to these features that are located within lnto l` 2 and 3 will be protected through designation, zoning and Site Plan Approval. Therefore, it (u our opinion that the proposed development is in conformity with the County of Simcoe Official Plan. 4.4 The Township of Oro-Mcdonte Official Plan The Official Plan of Township ofOm-Medonte designates the northerly portion o[ the subject property "Rural" and the remainder '^8uza[^ with on ^^Eovironnucotu( Protection Two" overlay designation. Surrounding lands 0u the north and east of the site are dcxiuuube} Shoreline which permits detached residential and limited commercial uses. The Official Plan Designations are shown ou Figure 3. An amendment to the Official Plan to redesignate the proposed lots to "Shoreline" and the remainder ofthe site 10 "Eovirnnroruta| Protection One" is proposed. Section C5.3.4 of the Consolidated Official Plan, that includes OPA No. 17. states: "Thefurther mpansimo/ohe shoreline development area onto lands that are not designated Shoreline is not permitted bvt6isPlan, Exceptions waybegranted through the approval oftin ()8�c/u//Yox umexuh,en/ if*/he u\pvvx/n/ /xxmu8 in xcok: and is either /ocuxxa/ on the shoreline or is considered to be /nfi//ng, hifilling is dqflined as development that uhutso development area on two sides andlor is located within a parcel of land that abuts public roads on at least three 8iaour opinion the redesignabon of2.5ha(&2 ac) of land which fi-onts on an open public road, with another public road to the east and a public road allowance to the west, and has existing Planning 8ockQmuodKepon Skdxm`Bmonv U6�&em�iu�x|nc Cmw��C000m`t ' November 6 2007 P/N 04-1892 Agricultural Rural Recreational Shoreline OVERLAY DESIGNATI()NS Environmental Protection Two SOURCE: IOWNSHIP OF ORO- MEDONTE OFFICIAL PLAN SCHEDULE 'A5' development to the north, southeast and east `oio conformity with this policy bn that hio both "small in scale" and meets the definition n[inQL In the amendment, Council iehobc satisfied that certain criteria are mtt.n As shown in Table |,the proposed amendment development are in conformity with these criteria. Table I Official Plan Conformity Section C5.3.4 Policy Conformity a) the lots will have a minimum area of 0.6 ha The average lot size for this development is .57 ha and the minimum lot area is 0.54 ha. The minimum size is adequate for a relatively large home and sewage disposal system, while minimizing the impact on the natural heritage features of the site. It is our opinion that the proposed lots are in conformity with the Official Plan given Policy C 17.7.1 d) "Minor Variations from numerical requirements in the Plan may be permitted without an Amendment provided that the general intent of the Plan is maintained." b) tile majority of the tree cover will be retained All of the tree cover will be retained within the and protected Environmental Protection Block, The EIS recommends that tree clearing on the lots be minimized. This will be implemented through Site Plan Approval. c) the development is compatible with existing The proposed lots are of comparable size and development scale to the adjacent lots to the north and east. The six new lots will face six existing lots on the north side Springhome Road. e) the lots conform to the general subdivision See below. and consent policies As described in Table 2`the proposed lots are io conformity with criteria huhe muhoOcd prior to the Committee of Adjustment giving consent to sever Planning Background Report Skelton, Bmnnv U&&smociutea|mc. Crawford Consent November 6.2007 P/N 04-1892 10 Table 2 Official Plan Conformity Section D2.2.1 Policy Conformity a) the lots front on a public road with year- All lots front on Springhome Road opposite other round maintenance permanent dwellings. b) the lots do not have direct access to a Springhome Road is a local Municipal Road. Provincial Highway or County Road C) will not cause a traffic hazard Springhome Road is flat with good sight distances, The proposed lots will not generate any more traffic than would be anticipated for a local road with residences on either side: d) are of adequate size and frontave for the As shown on the Lot Development Plan, the lots propose use are large enough to accommodate a dwelling and sewage disposal system within the required zoning setbacks. e) can be serviced with water and sewage The Hydrogeological Update has established that disposal facilities adequate water supply is available for private wells. Subsurface sewage disposal systems can be installed on each lot without adverse effect on the groundwater. f) will not have a negative impact on the There will be no significant change to drainage drainage patterns in the area trorn the developed lots. All drainage will be directed toward the roadway ditch or by overland flow toward the south thereby maintaining the overall drainage patterns in the area. g) will not restrict the development of other The remainder of the subject site will be parcels of land, particularly as it related to designated to preclude development, therefore the the provision of access, if they are proposed lots will not constrain development. designated for development by this plan h) will not have a negative impact on any The EIS has established that the natural heritage ecological feature in the area features of the area will be maintained and protected by their inclusion in an area that will not be developed, 1) will not have an negative impact on the The Hydrogeological Update has established that quality and quantity of groundwater for adequate water supply is available for private other uses wells. Subsurface sewage disposal systems can be installed on each lot without adverse effect on the groundwater. J) will conform to Section 5](24) of the Planning Act, as amended. Planning Background Report Skelton, Bmmnd|& Associates Inc. Crawford Consent November 6.2007 P/N 04-1892 Planning Background Report Skelton, mmvoU&Aoxoioxo/nc Crawford Consent ` P/N 04-1892 12 November 6, 2007 Table 2 Official Plan Conformity Section D2.2.1 Policy Conformity (24) In considering a draft plan of subdivision, Any accessibility issues will be addressed at the regard shall be had, among other matters, building permit stage by the individual lot to the health, safety, convenience, owners. accessibility for persons with disabilities and welfare of the present and future inhabitants of the municipality and to, (a) the effect of development of the The proposed development is consistent with the proposed subdivision on matters of Provincial Policy Statement. provincial interest as referred to in section 2; (b) whether the proposed subdivision is The development is infill on lands to be premature or in the public interest; designated for development and therefore not premature. It will utilize existing municipal c) whether the plan conforms to the OPA and development are in conformity to the official plan and adjacent plans of Official Plan, subdivision, if any (d) the suitability of the land for the The lands have been demonstrated to be suitable purposes for which it is to be for the proposed uses through the subdivided; Hydrogeological Update and EIS. (e) the number, width, location and No new roads are proposed. proposed grades and elevations of highways, and the adequacy of them, and the highways linking the highways in the proposed subdivision with the established highway system in the vicinity and the adequacy of them; (1) the dimensions and shapes of the The lots are regular in shape. proposed lots; The frontage and area of the lots complies with the provisions of the SIZ - Shoreline Residential (g) the restrictions or proposed No restrictions are proposed for the lots. Lands restrictions, if any, on the land containing with natural heritage features are to be proposed to be subdivided or the designated and zoned to protect the features. bL) I I dings and structures proposed to be erected on it and the restrictions, if any, on adjoining land; I Planning Background Report Skelton, mmvoU&Aoxoioxo/nc Crawford Consent ` P/N 04-1892 12 November 6, 2007 Bedcoizouboo of the |uodx with natural heritage features to the "Environmental Protection One" designation iobn conformity with Section B2.2uf the Official Plan. This Section identifies the intent uf this "Environmental Protection One" designation to include areas that have been identified uo environmentally significant through development review process. 13 Section B5]2.3nf the Official Plan requires that the implementing zoning by-law idcndFvuUlunda below the top ofbank of any river or stream inuspecific protection zone, and require a minimum of 30 metres setback from this zone for all buildings and structures. Reductions in this Planning Background Report Skc|mn.BmmwrU&Ao*�ix�sCrawford Consent Inc. November 6, 2007 P/N 04-1892 13 Table 2 Official Plan Conformity Section D2.2.1 Policy Conformity (h) conservation of natural resources and No natural resources are identified on the subject flood control; lands other than the natural heritage features to be (1) the adequacy of utilities and municipal Municipal road maintenance and garbage services; collection, and utilities are in place for the existing development. the adequacy of school sites The area is serviced by school buses. Given the limited size of the development no negative i mpact on schools is anticipated. (k) the area of land, if any, within the The dedication of Block 7 is proposed. proposed subdivision that, exclusive of highways, is to be conveyed or dedicated for public purposes; (1) the extent to which the plan's design The orientation of the lots provides opportun 'ties optimizes the available supply, means for solar exposure of the south side of the ol'supplying, efficient use and buildings. conservation of energy, and (in) the interrelationship between the N/A design of the proposed plan of subdivision and site plan control matters relating to any development on the land, if the land is also located within a site plan control area designated under subsection 41 (2) of this Act or Subsection 114 (2) of the City qf Toronto Act, 2006." Bedcoizouboo of the |uodx with natural heritage features to the "Environmental Protection One" designation iobn conformity with Section B2.2uf the Official Plan. This Section identifies the intent uf this "Environmental Protection One" designation to include areas that have been identified uo environmentally significant through development review process. 13 Section B5]2.3nf the Official Plan requires that the implementing zoning by-law idcndFvuUlunda below the top ofbank of any river or stream inuspecific protection zone, and require a minimum of 30 metres setback from this zone for all buildings and structures. Reductions in this Planning Background Report Skc|mn.BmmwrU&Ao*�ix�sCrawford Consent Inc. November 6, 2007 P/N 04-1892 13 ^ ° 3O metre setback do not require an amendment to the Official Plan, but do require anmnendi-dent to the zoning by-law n«u minor variance" Given that the lands hmhcdesignated Protection One" encompass both the natural heritage features and appropriate 30 to 5U metre wide buffers oa established hv the EIS, it is appropriate to have a special provision that exempts this development from the relevant provision in the Zoning By-law, 4.5 Zoning The subject lands are zoned Agricultural/Rural and Environmental Protection (Ep) ioZoning By-law Q7-05as shown on Figure 4. yn amendment to the Zoning to rezone the proposed }u\x to Shoreline RcuiJcnda| Exception (SR*_) is proposed. The 8ilzone permits lots with mmimum area nf0.21 hectares and minimum frontage o[3O metres, therefore the proposed lots are in uonop|iance*i(h these provisions uf the bv-}nvv». /\ special provision will apply k, require u 7.5 nietre wide side yard along the easterly limit of the property adjacent to Memorial Crescent and the adjacent lot. I A fbrUnz special provision will bc included in the by-law (o indicate that Section I20' which requires u30 metre setback from on Environmental Protection (}P) zone does not apply to the subject lands, The remainder o[Ux: lands zoned &urcu|tu,ul/Rura|(A/DD) wiUhcrczoncdtoMhtBuvironmcutu| Protection (IB) to identify and protect the natural heritage features. Land uses are restricted to those cdeoxvc as o[thc doVc of the hv-|uv/, and no structures are permitted in this zone except vvberc required for flood or erosion control". Planning BnukgmvndReport Crawford Consent P/N 04-1892 Skelton, 8mnnvd|& Associates Inc. November 6.2007 SOURCE TOWNSHIP OF ORO- MEDONTE ZONING BY -LAW 97 -95 SCHEDULE 'A5' 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ' Based on our research and site investigations, we conclude the following. ° The proposed Official Plan Amendment hredesignate the subject lands to^Sboreline'`and "^Uoviroorocntn| Protection One" is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement and in conformity with the policies of the County of Simcoe Official Plan and the Township of Oro- Medonte 0Diciu) Plan as amended by 0P/\a 16 and 17. ° The proposed Zoning Bv'uvv amendment vvuu|d implement the Official Plan amendment, regulate the development of a limited portion of the site, and identify and protect the natural heritage features no the remainder. ' " Site Plan Approval will ensure that development io limited <o areas zoned Shoreline Residential. , The proposed 6-lot development io also inconformity with the Official Plan criteria olatc to lot creation by Consent, and is compatible in oou|c and density with existing aborclino residential development adjacent k` and iu the vicinity nf the site. ° The proposed lots can he adequately oorviucd with water supply and sewage disposal systems with no negative Impact on existing wells or groundwater quality or quantity. " There will brnnnegative impact onthe natural heritage features orfunctions. ~ The proposed lots will make efficient use of existing municipal infrastructure, utilities and school bussing. No extension of municipal services is required. , lheMan represents good plann ing for the property and the surrounding 000. Thcrc/oru.wercconuncnddhcodoodonundopprovu}o[(bcODloiu|9lao/1mendoico{und adoption o{ the Zoning By-law Amendment. Wc also recommend approval u[ the consent application tnbc submitted once the Official Plan Amendment has been approved. P|onmngBaokgmvod Report Crawford Consent P/N 04-1892 16 Skelton, Bmnn, U&Axmciuteo|uc. November 6, 2007 All of which is respectfully submitted, & ASSOCIATES INC. per: wl-,4, Trudy P, Paterson, CET, RPP Senior Planner Planning Background Report Skelton, Bmnn, U&Asociuten|oc Crawford Consent November 6.2O07 P/N 04-1892 17 laFERENCES I Dept, Report No. 9l)Z0O4-27hx Planning Advisory Committee, Township of()ro-Mcdontc.6v Nick McDonald, 8Py, June Y,2OO4. 2 Skelton, BrumneU 6L Associates lnu, "Environmental Impact Study, Crawford Property, Part Lot 28. Concession 9, Township of()rn'Mndontc",dated December 5,2006. l Chapman, Ll. D.F. Pubouno, The Physiography of Southern Ontario, Second Edition, University o( Toronto Press for the Ontario Research Foundation, |966' page 304. 4. Rnfbnuo' D.VV` R.E. VVicklund and N.B- Report No. 29ofdhc Ontario Soil Survey, Research Branch, Canada Department of Agriculture and the Ontario Agricultural College, 1962. 5. Ontario Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, Provincial Policy Statement, March 2005, .Section 1.1.4. ' h. Amended toO.Rce.342/0G, section 3/l]). 7COUnty of Sim.coe Official Plan, June 2000` Section l6]), 8. |6i6, Section l6]i,l6.7. Y. |hvi, Section ).4. lO. Printed March l6,2007 Page 88. ||. |b�� Page Q8. 12. l6iJ, Page |6]. 13. |6id� Page 4O. 14. Ttij,Pauc52. lI Consolidated Version Printed February 2005. Fable Bl, Page 26. 16. lhidLl'able&5, Page 22, Planning Background Report Skelton, BmnmnU&' Associates Inc. Crawford Consent November 6.2007 PDN04'|Dv2 l8 Appendix A LSRCA Correspondence October 15, 2007 1: 905 - 895 -1281 1- 800 -465 -0437 905 -8i3 -5881 '�4;�i1: ini� n?Isrca.� >n.cn cl�: waw.isn'u.ua.ca 0 B yvicw Parkway 2,82 cNxmarket, Oiliario -Y 4X1 A Watershed shed for Life t7l 9 S '110I Sent by Facsimile 1 -705- 726 -0331 October 15, 2007 Ms. Trudy Paterson, CET, RPP Skelton Brumwell & Associates 93 Bell Farm Road, Suite 107 Barrie, ON L01, 21;0 Dear Ms. Paterson: lte: CRA Developments (Crawford), Part Lot 26, Concession 9, Township of Oro - Medonte, County of Simcoe Your rile:P /N 04 -1892 File No.: 2004- OPA -03 IMS No.: POFC445C,5 The Lake Simcoc Region Conservation Authority (LSRCA) has reviewed the revised Concept Plan - Figure 2A. We understand that the designation and zoning of the natural heritage features and related buffers within the lots, as well as Block 7 will be Environmental Protection I and EP as previously discussed (see attached figure 2A). We have no objection to the revised concept plan as proposed provided that the development of the proposed lots proceed through the site plan approval process as requested in our previous correspondence to the Township. With respect to Block 7 it is our preference that the Township acquire these lands. In the event that council decides not to accept Block 7, we would have no objection to the Block being added to Lot I . We will not require a Conservation 1asemcnt over Block 7 at this time as the LSRCA has not finalised our policy on Conservation Easements. I trust this is satisfactory. Please call me if you have any questions at 905 -895 -1281, ext. 286. Yours truly, .Jackie Burkart Senior Planner JB /ph Incl. (1) C. Glenn White, Township of Oro - Medonte, 1 -705 -487 -0133 - Fax ' --' - -Jackie 'B-u- r ka-rt'18-0%- PL' ANN|�NG FIGURES-FIGURE 2-A LOT U- ~EEV� L-0-P--M-- EN-' T- -P- LA -N' - p df - -' - � Page 1.� 0111010i ROAD kLLOWANC& KTVEEN LOTS 2& AND 26 (SnimoMME MCAD) LXJ RESIDENTIAL VACANT If 17 (YELLOW-BREAS7ED CHAT) CRAWFORD LOTS GUILDING ENVELOPE HABITAT BUFFER FIGURE 2A WATERWJRSE BUFFER PRELIMINARY LOT DEVELOPMENT "N TYPICAL RESI ENCE 1: 2000 TYPICAL SEWAGE BED UM H.pmprm.., / Appendix B Hydrogeological Update UPDATE • PRELIMINARY HYDROGEOLOGIC EVALUATIO PROPOSED LOTS CRAWFORD PROPERTY TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE Prepared For: Mr. Tim Crawford c/o Skelton, Brumwell & Associates Inc. Project 89 -83 August 12, 2004 Revised January 19, 2007 IAN D. WILSON ASSOCIATES LIMITED CONSULTING HYDROGEOLOGiSTS Clinton, Ontario Telephone (519) 233 -3500 Fax (519) 233 -3501 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.0 SITE SETTING, GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY ...................... 1 10 WATER SUPPLY 3.1 Water Well Records: 2 3.2 Water Quality: 2 ................................................ 3 4.0 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT 4 5.0 CONCLUSIONS ... 6 FIGURES AND APPENDIX UPDATE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL LOTS mwawaw"16, VIII WITHISI-MIUMMOR,10'aii "1! It is proposed to develop six residential lots on a 7.14 hectare parcel of land located in part of the west half of Lot 26, Concession 9, Township of Oro-Medonte (Oro). Figures 1 and 2 show the location of the proposed development. It is proposed to service the lots with individual subsurface sewage disposal systems and private drilled wells. In 1989, Ian D. Wilson Associates Limited completed a Preliminary Hydrogeologic Evaluation of a 17.82 hectare property which encompassed the current subject property (September 26,1989). It is understood from Mr. T. Crawford, owner of the property, that the Township has requested an update of the preliminary hydrogeologic evaluation to provide an opinion regarding the current viability of the property from water supply and sewage disposal risk perspectives. This update has been prepared using readily available background geological and hydrogeologic information, a review of the current Ministry of the Environment water well record database, water quality sampling of an adjacent drilled well, on-site shallow groundwater and downstream surface water as well as the results of a 1987 soils and shallow groundwater assessment conducted by Skelton, Brumwell & Associates Inc. This report summarizes the results of the evaluation and provides an opinion regarding the viability of the proposed development from water supply and sewage disposal risk perspectives. 2.0 SITE SETTING, GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY The property is located in the Bradens Bay area to the southwest of Memorial Crescent and fronting on the Road Allowance between Lots 25 and 26. The lands are entirely forested. Lands surrounding the site are in residential use except for lands to the southwest, which are undeveloped. A small tributary of Lake Simcoe rises on the property and flows eastward towards the Lake, which is situated about 450m from the proposed development at its closest point. The proposed development is located within the Simcoe Lowlands physiographic region of southern Ontario, an area once submerged in glacial Lake Algonquin and floored with sand, silt and clay. According to the Ministry of Natural Resources Map 2556 "Quaternary Geology of Ontario - Southern Sheet", the upper soils in the vicinity of the proposed development consist of an undifferentiated stony sandy silt to silt glacial till. The Soil Survey of Simcoe County reports the upper soils as loam (stony phase) of the Guerin Soil Series. The 1987 Skelton, Brumwell & Associates Inc. soils evaluation Ian D. Wilson Associates Limited 2 T. Crawford Property RE$ describes the predominant upper soil profile as consisting of a fine sand typically overlying a silt till. According to local water well records, the overburden is about 60 to 70 metres deep and consists typically of fine-grained deposits of clay, silt or hardpan. Two granular deposits are typically reported, one at an intermediate depth normally in the range of 20 to 30 metres below grade and the second a basal deposit normally atop the bedrock surface. The bedrock beneath the site consists of limestone with interbeds of shale belonging to the Simcoe Group of rock. Three main aquifers are indicated by the water well record database, these being the intermediate and basal granular deposits in the overburden and the bedrock. A small number of shallow wells are reported, with varying degrees of viability due to the typically fine-grained upper overburden. WATER SUPPLY 3.1 Water Well Records: To assess the probability of obtaining adequate well yields on the six proposed lots, current records for all reported water wells within Lot 26, Concession 9 were reviewed. The Ministry of the Environment water well record database currently contains the records for 69 wells within Lot 26, Concession 9. The following summarizes the well record information for the 39 reported water wells within the review area. Number of wells: 69 Drilled Construction: 61 Dug/Bored Construction: 8 Completed in Bedrock: 8 Completed in Overburden: 61 Reported Water Quality: Fresh: Sulphurous: Mineralized: Not Reported or Unknown Number of "dry" wells: 64 or 93% (no objectionable tastes or odours) none none 4 or 6% 1 or 1% (a single dug well) Maximum Minimum Average Well Depth (m) 69.2 4.6 43.2 Well Yield (L/min) 273 9 61 Test Period (Hours) 48 0.5 3.1 Reported Water Quality: Fresh: Sulphurous: Mineralized: Not Reported or Unknown Number of "dry" wells: 64 or 93% (no objectionable tastes or odours) none none 4 or 6% 1 or 1% (a single dug well) Ian D. Wilson Associates Limited 3 T. Crawford Prop" The average well within Lot 26, Concession 9 is of drilled construction, completed in either the intermediate or basal overburden aquifers to a depth of 43.2 metres and yields 61 litres of fresh-quality water per minute over a period of at least 3.1 hours. Based on contractor's reported information, the average well can yield in excess of 11,0000 litres per day. This significantly exceeds the water demand of a four bedroom home specified by the Ontario Building Code (2000 litres). As such, based on information contained in the Ministry of the Environment water well record database, there is a high likelihood that drilled wells with adequate yield for domestic use can be completed on the proposed lots. Any of the three identified aquifers (i.e. intermediate and basal overburden or bedrock) are suitable for domestic wells. It should be cautioned that the above summary and analysis is based solely on information contained in the Ministry of the Environment water well record database as reported by drilling contractors and is not subject to quality control. 3.2 Water Quality A sample of raw water was collected from a private residence (Pettift) located in Lot 26, Concession 9, adjacent to the southeast of the proposed development, on July 5, 2004. The residence is supplied with water by a drilled bedrock well with a completion depth of 66 metres, within the basal overburden aquifer. A copy of the water well record for this well is included in the appendix. As such, the quality of water from this neighbouring well can be expected to be similar to the quality of water obtained from future deep overburden drilled wells on the proposed lots. Following disinfection of the sampling tap and a one-hour purging of the water supply to obtain a fresh water sample, the sample of water was collected in laboratory-supplied bottles, stored in an ice-packed cooler and transported directly to SGS Lakefield Research for bacteriological analysis and PSC Analytical Services for general chemical water quality analysis. The bacteriological quality of the water sample was acceptable, with no detectable total coliform, E. Coli or background bacteria. The water from the neighbouring well is slightly alkaline, with a pH value of 8.15. The water is moderately hard, with a hardness value of 176mg/L as CaCO3. These values are typical of groundwater in southern Ontario. The iron content of the water at 0.42mg/L slightly exceeds the aesthetic Drinking Water Quality Standard of 0.3mg/L. Iron is a common constituent of groundwater in southern Ontario and is not a health-related concern. Elevated levels of iron will contribute to the staining of plumbing fixtures and laundry and may also contribute to colour and turbidity of standing water. Readily available from well contractors, plumbers and building centres, iron removing water treatment units are effective in reducing the iron content to acceptable levels. The colour of the water at 9.3TCU slightly exceeds the aesthetic Drinking Water Quality Standard of 5TCU, this laboratory exceedance likely due to iron precipitation during sample transit and storage. Ian D. Wilson Associates Limited 4 T. Crawford Property The sodium content of the water at 26.6mg/I is well below the aesthetic Drinking Water Quality Standard of 200mg/L but slightly exceeds the level at which physicians for persons on sodium-restricted diets should be notified (20mg/L). This is a common issue for groundwater in southern Ontario. All other parameters determined were at acceptable levels. The nitrate content of the water was non-detectable. A copy of the analytical report is included in the appendix. 1 •- ki gglk Under the current Ministry of the Environment "Technical Guideline For Individual On- Site Sewage Systems : Water Quality Impact Risk Assessment", each proposed development utilizing individual on-site sewage systems requires an assessment of groundwater impact potential. The purpose of the assessment is to ensure that the discharge from the individual on-site sewage systems will have a minimal effect on groundwater and the present or potential use of adjacent properties. Following the determination of background shallow groundwater nitrate levels, the assessment involves a three-step process, with the need to advance to the next step dependant on the requirements of the previous step. Where the background nitrate content of shallow groundwater exceeds 10 mg/L, additional development cannot normally be supported. To determine the background nitrate content of shallow groundwater, a temporary auger hole was installed in a low area near the southwest property line on July 5, 2004. The temporary hole was purged and grab samples were collected and submitted to PSC Analytical Services for nitrate content analysis. A second sample was collected from the creek at the downstream (east) end of the site, which will also represent shallow groundwater conditions as the creek rises on the subject property. The background nitrate content of the water from the temporary well was low at 0.5mg/L mg/L. The sample from the Creek contained no detectable nitrate ( <0.1 mg/L) as did the sample from the deep neighbouring well. Copies of the analytical results appear in the appendix. Under Step 1 of the guideline, for developments where the lot size for each private residence within the development is one hectare or larger (with no lots being less than 0.8ha in area), the risk that the limits imposed by the guideline may be exceeded is considered acceptable with no additional hydrogeologic assessment. The proposed development, with an overall average lot area of more than 1 hectare, meets Step 1 of the guideline, except that the proposed six lots are mostly smaller than 0.8ha. Step 2 of the guideline is only applicable where groundwater resources can be confidently demonstrated to be hydraulically isolated from potential sewage pathways, which will not the case for this proposed development due to a small number of shallow wells in the area. To calculate the theoretical impact of the 7.14 hectare development under the guideline, under Step 3 of the guideline, a mass-balance calculation is used to assess the Ian D. Wilson Associates Limited 5 T. Crawford Property development impact potential of the proposed lots. Under the current MOE guideline only infiltrating precipitation and the volume of water contained in the sewage may be considered as dilutants for the nitrate contained in septic effluent. To establish the infiltration rate, the percentage of the local water surplus which may infiltrate is calculated using the Rational Method approach. According to soil information, the soil profile is medium grained with a thin upper sand horizon (infiltration factor 20%), the overall relief is flat to rolling (infiltration factor 20%) and the cover will be mixed (infiltration factor 15010), all resulting in an infiltration factor of 55%. According to a Thornwaite calculation of the average annual water surplus, the average annual water surplus in the Barrie area is approximately 341 mm. As such, the annual infiltration rate will be 188mm (55% of 341mm), representing 20% of average annual precipitation at the Barrie weather station (938.5mm). Accordingly, approximately 1.3410' litres of water will annually join the shallow groundwater regime on the entire parcel. The following mass-balance formula is used to calculate the maximum permissible annual sewage loading: QTCT= QSCS+ QPCP Where: QT = SUM of Qs and Qp CT = Maximum nitrate concentration Qs = Volume of sewage (1000 L/day/lot) Cs = Nitrate content of sewage (40 mg/L) Qp = Infiltration CP = Nitrate content of shallow groundwater (assumed 0.5mg/L) Therefore: (2.19x106+ 1.34x10' L/yr)XCT=(2.19xlO'x4Omg/L)+(1.34x1 07 L/yrxO,5mg/L) CT= 6.Omg/L The above assessment approach, conducted in accordance with Ministry of the Environment Guidelines, does not consider sewage dilution by groundwater flow- through nor does it consider denitrification processes in the subsurface. As such, the assessment will over - estimate the actual degree of groundwater impact of the proposed lots, this considered a safety factor. Based on a sewage generation rate of 100OL/day as specified by the guideline, the theoretical nitrate impact of the six proposed lots under the current Ministry of the Environment Guideline over the entire proposal is 6.Omg/L. The maximum acceptable impact is 10mg/L, therefore the overall sewage impact risk posed by the six proposed lots is considered acceptable. Ian D. Wilson Associates Limited 6 T. Crawford Property Based on a review of local water well records, highly favourable groundwater conditions are anticipated at the proposed lots. Wells will be of drilled construction, completed in one of two confined overburden aquifers or the bedrock aquifer and will yield acceptable quantities of water for domestic use. 2. Based on a water sample collected from a representative neighbouring drilled well, the bacteriological quality of water from properly-constructed drilled wells will be acceptable. 3. Based on a water sample collected from a representative neighbouring drilled well, the general chemical quality of water from properly-constructed drilled wells will be acceptable. Aesthetic water quality issues such as elevated iron, common to groundwater in southern Ontario, can be anticipated. Readily available water treatment units are effective in reducing the iron and manganese content to acceptable levels, if so desired. The sodium content of the water slightly exceeds the level at which physicians for persons on sodium - restricted diets should be notified. 4. Based on the current Ministry of the Environment "Technical Guideline For Individual On-Site Sewage Systems: Water Quality Impact Risk Assessment", the sewage impact risk of the proposed six lot, 7.14 hectare development is considered acceptable. 5. A previous investigation conducted by Skelton, Brumwell & Associates Inc. (October 1987) detailed the technical requirements for sewage system installation. IAN D. WILSON ASSOCIATES LIMITED Geoffrey Rether, B.Sc., P.Geo. August 12, 2004 Revised January 19, 2007 PROPERTY BOUNDARY PROPOSED LOT LINES I_I BUILDING ENVELOPE TYPICAL RESIDENCE (2150 sq.ft) aTYPICAL SEWAGE BED -4 0 1; • 03 PRELIMINARY LOT DEVELOPMENT PLAN FIGURE 1 1: 2000 P/N 1892 SEPT 2006 ® Skelton Bramwell CONSULTING ENGINEERS & PLANNERS 93 6ELL FARW RQ40 , MEYHONE (705) 716 -1141 'Ur l 107 BMW . ONttA10 1411 501 FAX (705) 716 -0331 FIGURE 1 79.30' 90 1 620000mE `y 54.0 ( T w ~ 242.5 2A 24 eK e .257.5 .258. ..:.. \\ ,,,,_ w \\ 2 .0 • A • N 246 m \260.5 • 2 230 r .233.0 5 Q' 6. • • 2 • 224 / ; .241 .0 • \ ♦ • 0 L ♦ 3. 260 • • l 260. /� I • • 22 • • ♦ • .22 0 • �\ "as 2% 2 .5 2 • PRO SED DE ELOP ENT I 223. 40 � •. • 0 70 z 5 / BR 2 O / 237. .232.5 AY 230 • • .231.5 I 232.5 � O ♦ 237 5 , BrOdenS s. Boy z o • • .233.0 zz5 • • ♦ • •• • 22 0 • . 4.0 /• .229.0 • .5 - - -- — -- -- -- - - -. 4-5 - -- — 30 • 26.0 227.0 • • y • A • • • 2 3. N • • • • • ' ... �. • • 223 tom- DIAGRAM SHOWING LOCATION OF • ORO PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT .� s•• BEACH I • FIGURE 2 SCALE 1:10,000 • % 6 SGS Lakefield Research Limited 746 Baseline Rd. E. Suite 202 London - Ontario - N6C 5Z2 Phone: 519-672-4500 FAX: 519-672-9379 Ian Wilson Associates Attn : Geoff Rether grether@tcc.on.ca P.O.Box 299 Clinton, ON, Canada Phone: 519-233-3500 Fax:pdf Date Rec. : 06 July 2004 LR Report: CA20114-JUL04 Copy: #1 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS Final Report *Note: For all microbiological analysis, the "Approved Date" and "Approved Time" reflect the laboratory "Analysis Date" and "Analysis Time", as required under the SDWA, 2002. Karel Kamerman - Senior Technologist Page I of 1 Data reported represents the sample submitted to SGS Lakefield Research. Reproduction of this analytical report in full or in part is prohibited without prior written approval, Sample, ID Sample Date & Time Terytp#r. Itur Q(Vop, �E,Cofi Ft 111,00',mL Total lifcrm L Back CFU1104mL 1: *Approved Date 06-Jul-04 06-Jul-04 06-Jul-04 2: *Approved Time 21:15 21:15 -- 21:15 3: MAC 0 0 200 4: NR - Crawford 05-Jul-04 14:00 9.3 0 1 0 1 L--� 9 4 16-PIR 11119# 96 jul 94 4&99 *Note: For all microbiological analysis, the "Approved Date" and "Approved Time" reflect the laboratory "Analysis Date" and "Analysis Time", as required under the SDWA, 2002. Karel Kamerman - Senior Technologist Page I of 1 Data reported represents the sample submitted to SGS Lakefield Research. Reproduction of this analytical report in full or in part is prohibited without prior written approval, 4 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS Attention Client Name Address Telephone FAX MR. GEOFF RETHER Wilson, Ian D., Associates Ltd P.O. Box 299 Clinton. ON NOM 1L0 519 -233 -3500 519 - 233 -3501 Laboratory Work Order: 119978 This Certificate of Analysis is for the following Sample Received on: 6- Jul -2004 ANALYTICAL SERVICES INC. Reported on 16- Ju1-2004 Client Reference: Crawford The report contain, the followr ng sections Purchase Order: Section: 1_ Case Narrative Quotation No.: 2. Analytical Resin's 3. Methodology Suiniir ) Results for solids samples are corrected for moisture and reported as dry weight. We are proud to be Accredited by: Standard Council of Canada (SCC) / CAFAL to ISO '7025 (%1799) Licensed by: Ministry of Environment(MOE)- Orinking Water 7esting (tf2'21) for, specific tests Water samples are discarded 4 weeks after the results have been reported. Solid samples are reta)n red for " mo�th, Storage for longer periods requires prior arrangement with the laboratory_ Reviewed and AuthorizAd by Kathie Hughes Project Manager NOTE The enclosed results relate only to the sample or item as received by the libo-ato"i,. This report may be reproduced in full. Reproduction of a partial report must have the written authorization of the laboratory. 921 LEATHORNE STREET, LONDON, ONTARIO, CANADA N5Z 3M7 T (519) 686 -7558 F (519) 686 -6374 W www.pscanalytical.com PSC Analytical Services ` CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS - SECTION I Attention: MR. C[8FF RETHER [l1ent Name: N1bon. Ian D., Associates Ltd. Address: P.O. Bow 299 76722 A1/port Line, R.R. #6 Clinton. ON NOM ILO Telephone: 5I0'233'3600 FAX: b19-233 3501 Laboratory Work Order: 119978 Sample(s) Received on: h -Jul '2V0 Reported on: 16'Jul'200 Sample Shipment Receipt and Login: CASE NARRATIVE Temperature on receipt was 5,81C. The maximum allowable temperature is lU^C according to Canadian regulations or . guidance documents. Samples submitted to the laboratory soon after sampling are exempt, provided that cooling has been initiated. Cooling is not required for certain situations such as: Waste for classification or specific matrices or tests such as PCB in o1l There are no other notable miiiments Sample Analysis: No exceptions were rioted during analysis. General Comments: Nuoe. PSC Analytical Services 921 Leathorme Itree{, Lnndon, 0ntar1o, Canada N5Z 3M7 (619) 686'7668 1'800-268'7396 FAX: (519) 686'6374 Refer to the cover page for a list of report contents. PSC Analytical Services ~ CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS - SECTION 2 Cl1ent:(1101) A1lsm. Ian D.. Associates Ltd— Clinton ANALYTICAL RESULTS Kepor ed:l6'Jul'2OU4 Page: l of 2 � Attention: MR. G[OFF kETH[R Purchase Order: � � Client Reference: Crawford Dote Received: 6'Jul'200 � ! Work Order: 119978 Sample Type: Liquid � Sample # Test Result Units EQL Comment 04'A020963 Sample Description: Crmvhzn2 Date & Time Sampled: 6-Jul'2004 PH Value 8,15 pH units O'l Ammonia as N O]2 mg/L 0.05 Nitrate as N ^ 0l mg/L 0.1 Nitrite as M ^ 0.02 mg/L 8.02 Nitrate + Nitrite as N < 8�1 mg/L O�l Carbon, Diu. 0rg. as C VJ mg/L Vj Phosphory .0oa.0rth as P 0.08 mg/L 0.002 Conductivity 306 us/cm l Sulphate as SO4 12 mg/L 2 Alkalinity CaCO3 152 mg/L S Chloride as Cl 2 mg/L l Colour 9�3 TCU 2.5 Fluoride r 0.29 mg/L 0.1 Calculated Hardness CaC83 176. mg/L Turbidity 0,51 NTU 0.1 Bicarbonate as HCO3 ISO, mg/L Carbonate CO3 2 mg/L Total Cation 433 mpq/L Total Anions 3.35 meq/L Ion Balance 17.2 % difr Calculated T.D.S. 209 mg/L Calculated Conductivity 275� us/cm Saturation pH @4C 8.05 pH units Saturation pH @20C 7,65 pH units Langelier Index K4C 0.10 Langel1er Index @20C 0.50 Aluminum Al 010 mg/L 8�03 8vr1vm 8a 0,05 mg/L 0.04 Beryllium Be < 0.01 mg/L 0,01 Bismuth 8, ` 0.1 mg/L 0 l Boron B 0�08 mg/L 0,02 Cadmium Cd < 0�002 mg/L 0,002 Calcium Ca 41,9 mg/L 0.05 � EOL Estimated Oent1tat1on Limit | � Refer to the cover page for a list of report contents. � P5C Analytical Services 921 Leathnrne Street, Londun, Ontario, Canada NB 3M7 (519) 086-7558 1'800'268'7390 FAX (519) 686'6374 PSC Analytical Services - CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS - SECTION 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS Client:(1101) Wilson, ]an D.. Associates Ltd., Clinton Reported�16-Jul-2004 Page: 2 of 2 Attention: MR. GEOFF RETHER Purchase Order: }S,l Client Reference: Crawford Date Received: 6-Jul-2004 Work Order� 119978 Sample Type: Liquid Sample # Test Result Units EQL Comment 04'A00963 Sample NscripLion�Crawford Chromium Cr < 0.01 Cobalt Cu ' 0.02 Copper Cu c O 01 Dissolved Silica as 5102 }S,l lrno Fe 0.42 Lead Pb / O 081 Magneuimn Mg 17�4 Manganese Mn 0.03 Molybdenum Mu < 8 02 Nickel Ni ' 0.05 Phosphorus as P ^ 0.05 Potassium K 1,76 Silver Ag ~ 0�01 Sodium Na 26.6 Strontium Sr 0.58 /1n 3n < 0,2 Titanium Ti < 0,02 Vanadium Y ` 0.01 Zinc Zn 0.28 04-AO20964 Sample Description: 0S Creek Nitrate as N ' 0.1 04'A0209B Sample Description: U/8 A/H Nitrate as N 0�50 Date & Time Sampled: 6-Jul'1004 mg/L V�Ol ' mg/L 0�O2 mg/L 0.01 mg/L 0.05 mg/L 0.02 mg/L 0�0Ul mg/L 0.02 mg/L 0.02 mg/L 0.02 mg/L 0.06 mg/L 0.05 mg/L 0.2 mg/L 0.01 mg/L 0.5 mg/L 0.02 mg/L 0.2 mg/L 0,02 mg/L 0.01 mg/L 0.01 Date & Time Sampled: 0'Jul'2004 mg/L O�l Date 8 Time Sampled: 6'Jul'2004 mg/L 0�l i EOL Estimated Ouant1tat1on Limit � / Refer to the cover page for a list of report contents,/ BC Analytical Services 921 Leathorne 3traet, London, Ontariu, Canada N6Z 3M7 (519) 686'7558 I'800'288'7390 FAX (510) 686'6374 PSC Analytical Services ^ CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS - SECTION 3 METHODOLOGY SUMMARY Cl\ent:(101) Wilson, Ian D., Associates Ltd., Clinton Repur ed:l6'Jul-2OO4 Page: l of 2 Attention: MR. GEOFF RITHER Purchase Order: Client,Reference� Crawford Date Received: 6-Jul-2004 Work Order: 119978 Sample Type� Liquid Test Methodology, Reference Instrument Analyst pH Value 8ectmmetr1cMeasurement PC'1-1trate System 8, Popov1c [PA SW846 9040A Ammonia as N Salicylate/Nitropruss`de Color1metry Skalar SanPlus System 'N H.8ourUeau \ka|ar, like EPA 350.1 modified Nitrate as N Auto Hydrazine Reduction Culur`metry Technicon AA [l N0x H.Uourdeav [PA 353.1 and SM 4500 NOJ H Nitrite as N Auto NED D1kydrnchlurige Colnr1metry Technicon &A Il N0n H.8ourdeav like manual [PA 354.1 and 3M 4500 NO2 B Nitrate + Nitrite as N Auto Hydrazine Reduction Color1metry Technicon AA ll NOx H.8nvrdeau EPA 353.1 and 5M 4500 NO3 H Carbon, Diss Org. as C Automated Persolphaie/UV Colnr1meLry Technicon AA l] DOC E Daw1dek M8E CO 16 1983, principle of EPA 415.2 Phusphurus.D1ss Orth as P Auto Ascorbic Acid Reduction Color1me1ry Technicon AA 11 low TP E Daw1dek SM 4500 P F and [PA 365.1 Conductivity Conductivity Cell Meter Reading PC'T1irate System H Popovic EPA SW846 9050A Sulphate as 504 Automated Methyl Thymol Blue Co|or1metry Technicon &A 11 304 C Lanaus EPA 5H846 9036 Alkalinity CaCO3 Manual Titration P[ T1trate System B. Pupuv`c SM 23208 and [PA 310.1 Chloride as Cl Automated Ferr1cyan1de Cnlur1metry Technicon AAlI Chloride C Lanaus EPA SN846 9251 � Test procedures are based on the above references.� � EXPLANATION OF CODES: � � EPA US Environmental Protection Agency MOE Ontario Ministry of the Environment � � 3M Standard Methods for the Analysis of Waters and Wastewater P_ Philip Analytical Services Location | P5C Analytical Services 921 Leathnrme Street. London, Ontario, Canada N6Z 3M7 (6I9) 686'7558 1-800-268 -7396 FAX (519) 686'6374 Refer to the cover page for a list of report contents. PSC Analytical Services ~ CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS - SECTION 3 Client:(1181) N1bon. Ian D., Associates Ltd., Clinton � Attention: MR. GEOFF R[THER � Client xefcrence� Crawford � Work Order: 119978 ! Test Methodolwgy, Reference Colour Manual Platinum-Cobalt Cnlor1metry Hach 8026, like 5M 2120 B, [PA 110 ,2 Hmride F lon-Selective Electrode [PA SW8 6 9214 lurb1U1ty Nephelometr1c Method, 6M 2130 8 SM 2130R and [PA 180.1 Metals by [CP Analysis by lCP EPA SW846 600 iexU Pb Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption EPA SW 846 7000 Metal Digestion, water Block Digestion or equivalent EPA 3W 846 3006 Metal Digestion GF, water Block Digestion or equivalent EPA 5W 846 3020 METHODOLOGY SUMMARY Repnrted:16'Jul'2004 Page: 2 of 2 Purchase Order: � Date Rece1ved� 6'Jol-2004 � Sample Type: Liquid � Instrument Analyst � Milton Roy Spectronic 601 E. Dawidek Hach Turb1dimeter C.Lanaus L Luc � Test procedures are based on the above references, � � EXPLANATION OF CODES: � � [PA US Environmental Protection Agency MOE Ontario Ministry of the Environment/ � SM Standard Methods for the Analysis of Waters and Wastewater P_ Philip Analytical Services Location � PSC Analytical Services 921 Leathorne SLreet, Lnmdnn, 0ntarin, Canada N5Z 3M7 (519) 686-7558 1-800-268-7396 FAX (510) 686'6374 Refer to the cover page for a list of report contents. bAPlklL- W C O�4T WATER BUDGET MEANS FOR THE PERIOD 1978 TO I—T8 -7 LAT.... 44o38 WATER HOLDING CAPACITY...150 MM HEAT INDEX... 35o04 LONG.** 79.63 LOWER ZONE*.000000**oo**, 90 MM, A-o...00..o-- 1.055 OAT` TEMP (C) PCPN RAIN MELT PE AE DEF SURP SNOW SOIL ACCUM PCPI� 31— 1 —9.2 114 10 a 0 0 0 14 132 145 310 28— 2 —7.4 47 12 35 1 1 0 44 133 146 377 31— 3 —2.3 66 31 90 6 6 0 111 78 150 449 30— 4 5.5 61 59 79 31 31 0 107 0 150 510 30- 6 16*6 76 76 0 106 106 0 0 0 tub o0z 31- 7 20.5 76 76 0 133 124 -8 0 0 60 743 31- 8 19.- 97 97 0 115 104 -12 0 0 53 838 30- 9 1'j.8 98 98 0 76 72 -4 19 0 60 937 31-10 8.3 80 80 0 38 37 0 4 0 99 81 30-11 2.3 73 65 8 11 11 0 23 0 138 159 31-12 -3.') 84 27 16 2 2 0 32 42 147 238 AVERAGE 6.4 TOTAL 948 706 236 594 569 —24 365 ;A7AzR ;;Z" ZA7A ozal -00i. Aug i1 2 41 PAGE it C&URTY: SiiKCt Ts v+cvww 11=17= ...,... 11. '.i.:.: liT MUNICIPALITY V1K CSG KIND WATER STAT PUM TEST TBST SCREEN DOTER CONCESSION WELL BASTING ELEV DIA OF FOUND CVL LVL RATE TINE PLATER DEPTH LSN!,TK DEPTHS IN FRET TO WHICH RTC LOT NO NORTHING FEET DATE DRILLER INS WATER PERT FEET FRET GPM HR ;MN USE PEST FEET FORMATIONS EXTEND CONTINUING... ONO TOWNSHIP CON 09 025 57- 619330 750 1975/09 2517 06 FR 0094 FLY 85 a 3 :0 DO - -- 12956 4924200 ERXN CLAY o002 GIRT CLAY FS" 0092 VIUM GRVL 0094 COS 09 025 57- 620330 740 1975/07 2514 06 PR 0094 PLV 55 10 2 :0 DO --- 13115 4924850 14kM DKCL 0001 ERNK SAND CLAY BLDR 0005 GREY CLAY SILT GRVL 0094 BRUN FGVL 6094 CON 09 025 57- 620300 740 1976/04 3660 04 PR 0114 FLN 15 2 :0 DO - -- 13259 4924800 SLCK tow 0001 CAST CLAY BL1RR SNDY 0027 GREY CON 09 025 57- 620400 735 1976/06 3660 05 PR 0106 mW 25 15 2 :0 DO 13258 4924650 COX 09 026 57- 619850 750 1970/45 4608 30 DRY 87161 4923850 CON 09 026 57- 620350 725 1970/07 4713 06 FR 0032 6 30 30 2 :30 DO 07623 4924650 cow! 05 ,..-„ 5 ?- 61 ^964- .... rn 22 1c 1 .2 -10 DZ.—.'t 03 34559 4924231 CON 09 026 57- 619946 750 1970/04 1204 O5 PR 0073 25 53 6 2 :0 DO 47187 4923810 CON 09 026 57- 619940 750 1970/05 4608 30 PR 0060 15 22 2 :0 DO 07159 4921850 CON 09 026 57- 619940- 2000/05 2513 08 PR 0206 15S E 2 :0 DO 0203 03 35291 4924233 CON 09 026 57- 620025 722 196'7/09 4713 06 FR 0194 FLX 30 20 3 :0 DO 43349 4924272 CON 09 026 57- 619690 750 1969/04 4715 04 - DO 07211 4923800 CON 09 026 57- 619940- 2000/04 7061 06 PR 0080 0 55 10 6 : DO 35761 4924233 CON 09 026 57- 619080 725 1970/06 4606 30 PR 043S 5 13 5 1 20 DO 07291 4924150 CON 09 026 57- 620170 73S 1970/07 4608 30 FR 0623 12 20 5 1 :0 DO 07395 4924680 CON 09 026 57- 620031 2002/01 3413 06 FR 0075 DO 0081 03 37755 4924244 CON 09 026 57- 619720 730 1969/05 4715 04 PR 0067 FLIP 44 3 2 .0 DO 47210 4924200 CON 09 026 57- 620470 725 1970/03 4608 30 FR 0040 10 19 1 :30 DO 47089 4924750 CLAY qmm 0065 GUST CLAY STNS 0092 GREY CLAY MY 0114 YLLW CENT) 0117 YLLW GM 0116 DPW CLAY 0010 GREY CLAY OOS7 ORGY CLAY ORVL 0106 BRHN GRVL SAND 0108 HRHM CLAY SINS 0920 GREY CLAY STNS 0045 BRUN HPAN 0065 EHNN GRVL CLAY STNS 0030 BLUE GEVL PAWD 0032 RAW SILT SAND BGDR 0008 GREY SILT BLOW SAND 0030 GREY SILT CLAY SAND 0042 GREY GRVL SILT OL02 GREY SILT CLAY SAND 0134 GREY CLAY SILT STKY 0168 GREY SILT CLAY GRVL 0211 GARY GRVL CLAY SAND 0214 GREY GBVT, SAND SILT 0216 BRAN CLAY 0004 GREY CLAY NSNO DEMK 6045 SHM" M3ND GRVL 0049 GREY CLAP MM STNS 0073 WEEK CLAY SINS 0020 GREY CLAY STNS 0049 LOAM FILL 0004 BRWK CLAY SILT ELDR 0009 GREY SILT CLAY GRVL 0201 GREY SAND SILO' SINS 0206 113AM 0002 CLAY DLZR 0085 FLUB CLAY 4193 GRVL 0194 GREY CLAY ELDR 0140 CLAY GRVL 0015 CLAY 0045 CLAY GRVL HARD 0065 SAND CLAY 0080 SAM ORVL 0082 BLCE LOA14 0001 GREY CLAY STNS 0015 HENN CLAY STNS OOIO GREY CLAY STMS 0020 GREY GRVL STNS 0023 B3LWV CLAY 0010 GREY CLAY 0075 awwo SAND GEVL 0064 GREY CLAY GRVL BLDG 44G7 BEEN CLAY STMS 0010 ELUE CLAY STNS 0039 OWEY MEND 0040 I ? 3 w Lfl r m A r cn (ru tJi r A tV 4T) 0 MAT= -,21-L --7=Mi Arg 11 2:04 P-A—= 1: .. clX= GUM" NNTU-1k PULIZIrr" Pvtp"Rr MUNICIPALITY UTM CSG X-131D WATER STAT PUMP TBST TUST SCRISN CWXRR CONCRSSION WEILL BASTING HLUV DIA OF FOUM LVL LVL RATE TIM WAMM DEPTE! LROGIN DZPTRS IN FORT IV WHICH BTC LOT 190 NORTKING FSB7 DjkTB DftjMBR .INS JfAT= FEW FRBT PERT Gp,( HRIKK 1USX rRrr PRwr FOWQT:I<ws mrrEXD CONTINUING... ORO TVwVSjHIp Cox 09 026 57- 615944- 1991/10 2431 05 PR 0220 PLW 240 4 5 :0 DO --- 29398 4924231 BRUN LOAM Coal EMWK CLAY QRVL BLDR 0023 GREY CLAY TILL BLDR 0074 GVXT CLAY SNUT SOFT 0095 ORGY FS" SLTr D090 QRSY CLAY TIM 0112 BRUN SAND GRVL 0116 GREY CLAY OlfS GRBY SP" SLTY QRVL 0170 GREY SAND GRVL SLVX 0172 GREY CLAY TIM ULM 0206 OR" Lmw 0227 Cox 09 426 S7- 620472 725 1947/09 4713 06 F1 0160 PLW DO - -- 03348 4424159 1AW4 0402 URVA CLAY STNS; 0013 BLOB CLAY BLDR 0097 EIGUR CLAY STUS 0120 SLUR CLAY OlSt GXV16 "Sm olff CON 09 026 57- 620359 725 1973/04 4713 06 F1 OLSS FLIV 50 20 2 :30 DO - -- 10262 4924652 MW GRVL CLAY 0060 BLUE CLAY BLUR GRVL 0196 wt"K GRYL SAND 01" CON o9 026 57- 619919 725 1967/12 4715 06 PI 0038 mv 18 23 2 :0 PS - -- 03350 4924092 Lj3W COOL CLAY KSM COOS CLAY GRVL BLDR 00" XSND GRVL 0090 CON 09 026 57- 620043 725 1165/07 4713 06 P1. 0091 FLV 20 40 2 :0 DO --- 03346 4924004 PRDG 0012 BLUR CLAY STNS COND OWL 0091 CON 09 026 57- 619944- 1991/12 1456 as pi also 20 LGS 5 1 :0 DO - -- 29012 4924231 3RXN U" 0002 BV" CLAY SAND 0022 GREY CLAY 0079 GREY CLAY SAND STNS 0123 GREY SAND CLAY 0145 GREY CLAY SAM GRVL 0177 GARY GRVL SAND POLLS 0140 CON 09 026 57- 6204L2 730 1966106 4713 06 P1 0135 PLW so 20 3 :0 DO - -- 03347 4924811 LOAN 0002 CLAY BLDR 0095 BLUE CLAY YISHD 0133 GRVL KSXD 0135 CON D9 026 57- 619992 725 1367/11 4608 30 FR 0011 11 2 no 03351 4923990 V.6ND 0006 CLAY t0M 0025 CON 09 926 57- 629777 722 1947/07 49X6 46 PR 0200 FLW 24 15 3 -.0 DD - -- 03353 4923565 BRNV CLAY Call GARY CLAY STUS, 0187 NAND 0194 NSM GRVL 0210 CON 09 026 57- 629905 925 1959/07 2514 06 rk 0180 PLW 190 4 3 ;0 DO 03344 4923821 LOAN "#I BRUN CLAY RtmR. 0025 RIAN CLAY BLDR 0154 BLUR CLAY 0179 HSWD 0180 CON 09 026 57- 620259 725 1961/08 4713 04 FR 0093 FUR DO - -- 03345 4924541 PR1DG DDIO CLAY BLDR 0448 BLUE CLAY STNS 0092 GRVL CLAY 0093 CON 09 026 57- 629940 725 1966/03 5455 20 PR 0025 DO 05450 4924180 IRBY CLAY HSKD STNS 0030 CON 09 026 57- 620000 730 1968/07 4723 06 PR 0090 nV 85 3 2 :0 no - -- 05440 4924500 LOAN 0002 SPJM CLAY STNS 0030 SUM CLAY 81,rdt 4040 BLUE! CLAY 0009 GRVL WSPID 00" CON 09 026 57- 619944- 1990/09 3660 05 FR 0206 4 too 5 2 .0 DO - -- 27218 4924231 OLCK LOAK 0002 DRWN CLAY BLUR 0010 GRBY CLAY BLDR, DDSL GREY SAND GRVL CHTD OL70 GXNY CLAY SOFT 01949 ORGY SAND GRVL CkTD 0203 GRBY QaVL DXTY WM 02" DRXX ENDS WRAG 0207 CON as 026 57- 620050 720 1977/07 2204 ux 0214 2 24 a 1 .30 DO - -- 14464 4924300 BRVX CLAY 0004 GRZY CLAY SAND MS 0127 GREY CLAY SAND OISS GREY SAND QM CLAY 0156 GREY cbm SAM QIGS BUMM SAND CLAY 0186 <UtZY CLAY GRVL 0207 GRXY IN= 0214 CON 09 026 57- 620400 725 2570110 4713 06 PR 0279 FLV so 20 2 :30 00 - -- 07624 4124700 SLAB CLAY BLDR 0175 SUM GRVL KSND 0378 CON 09 026 S7- 629290 730 1175/04 2514 as m 0030 FUR 60 9 2 -.0 no - -- 130" 49246430 LOAN DKCL COOL BRWX SAND CLAY 0004 GRRY SILT CLAY GRVL 0090 BRXW F.-Vt, 0090 txj r 0 En --A E UNT8R WELL DATA SYSTEM Aug 11 2004 PAGE; 13 COURVIS SIMME GROUND WATER BULLETIN REPORT (MUNICIPALITY UTK CEO KIND HATER STAT PUMP TEST TEST SCREEN OWNER CONCESSION WELL EASTrWG EL v DIA OF FOUND LVL LVL RATE TIME WATER DEPTH LENGTH DELTUS IN FEET TRC, WHICH 8TC LOT NO NORTHING PSET DATE ORt LL8R INS WATER FEW FEET FEET GM XR :WN USE FREY FEET FORMATIONS ErrEm CONTINUING... ORD TOWNSHIP CON 09 026 57- 619944- 1988/94 2S13 06 FR OL90 FLN 16 LS 2 :30 00 - -- 23235 4924231 GRVL PILL 0003 BLCX MUCK 0006 GREY CLAY SILT BLDR 0185 GREY LMSN SRLS 0195 CON 09 026 57- 619820 725 1975104 3203 06 FR 0180 PLW DO - -- L3392 4924040 BRWN LOAM 0001 BRNN CLAY 0014 GREY CLAY STNS HARD 0076 GREY CLAY GRVL 0107 GREY CLAY SOFT 0180 BRw SANG 43RVL D180 CON 09 026 57- 620350 730 1976/08 3660 05 FR GIL5 FLW 10 20 2 :4 DO - -- 13622 4924710 HLCX LOAM 0001 GREY CLAY BLDR 0103 GREY CLAY GRVL D115 BRIM GRVL SAND 4116 CON 09 026 57- 620950 725 1976/10 1452 05 FR 0208 22 40 34 DO - -- 13894 4923800 BRifN P1LL Ct,AY gTNS 00 4 BR59bt SAND BLUR 0016 CCU 09 026 57- 619640 750 1916/11 4241 06 FR 0208 FLN 5 2 :30 DO L3961 4923700 CON 09 026 57- 619944- 1980/11 4245 Of PR 0180 FLN LOD 20 4 :0 DO 17132 4924231 CON 09 026 57- 619900 735 1977/05 4241 06 PR 0083 FLN 25 3 :0 DO 14136 4924360 CON 09 026 57- 619890 730 1976/01 3660 05 P'R 0077 FLN DO 12719 4924300 CON 09 026 57- 620050 720 1977/07 1204 06 FR 0190 38 8 99:59 DO 14463 4924200 CON 09 026 57- 619660 750 1975109 2517 06 FR 0221 15 190 10 3 :0 DO 12950 4923750 Cox 09 026 57- 619850 750 1979109 3135 05 UK 0220 32 92 5 4 :0 DO 16641 4923850 CON 09 026 57- 619950 725 1979/09 3135 05 FR 0071 PLH 6 18 1 :30 DO 16634 4924300 CON 09 026 57- 619950 750 1979/08 4816 06 FR 0193 FLX 15 5 :0 DO OL91 03 16404 4924050 CON 09 026 57- 620500 725 1978/05 3660 OS PR 0087 FLN 1S 1 :0 DO 15153 4924750 CON 09 026 S7- 620100 725 1978/02 4816 06 FR 0178 PLN LO 2 40 DO 0177 03 15179 4924100 CON 09 026 57- 620100 725 1979/03 4814 06 PR 0183 FLN 30 2 :0 DO 0187 03 15180 4924100 - - O GREY EVAN BLUR HARD 4186 GREY CLAY GRVL 0206 GREY SHLE LMSN 0215 BRUN SAND GRVL P'S,d)R 0#18 GREY PEND GRVL CLAY 0171 BRWN FSND MEND G.AVL OL89 GREY CLAY 0202 BRUN 14SNO MGVL 0210 UNXN 0006 GREY "PAN 0052 GREY GAVL BLVIR 046S GREY SAND CLAY 0105 GREY SAND 0110 GBBY SAM GRVL CLAY 0128 GREY SPAN 0154 MET SAND GRVL SILT 0170 WHIT SKW 0180 URNS SAND GRVL 0014 GREY CLAY STNS GRVL 0035 GREY CLAY GRVL SNDY 0977 SAWN FSND MUD PGVL 0085 BLCK LOAM 0002 GREY CLAY BLUR 0075 BRUN SAND GRVL 0077 PRDG 0349 GREY CLAT BLDR GRVL 0050 GREY CL,21Y SAND GRVL 0190 BLCX LOAM 0002 GREY CLAY F BLUR 0214 SEWN GRVL SAND SILT 0219 BRWN GRVL CLAY 0221 PRDG 0080 GREY CLAY GRVL SINS 0218 IAiS" 0220 BRVW CLAY 0007 GREY CLAY GRVL STNS 0071 GRVL 0071 CLAY BLUR 0060 CLAY 0091 CLAY ELOR 0128 SAND GRVL 0127 CLAY SOFT 0193 SAND SILT 0195 MEND 07.98 LKW 0202 HLCK LOAM 0002 BR1LY CLAY 0010 GREY C" "m 0065 GREY CLAY HARD 0071 GiIEY GRVL CLAY 00$2 GREY SAND CMTD 0087 BMW SAND QRVL 0091 CLAY SAND STNS 0096 SAND CLAY GRVL 0139 CLAY GRVL SANG 0170 CLAY 0179 N.SND GRVL LIED 0183 - LMSN FCRD 0191 CLAY STNS SLOB 0146 CLAY SAND LYRD 0274 MSND CLAY 0181 CLAY 0183 MSI4D 0193 L44SK 0195 1 FBI f • i t-' Q1 N L4 (A (l�A c m -0 i-� Ctt HATER WELL DATA SYSTEM Aug 11 2004 PAGE: 14 COUNTY: SIMCOE GROUND WATER BULLST3N REPORT XIINICIPALLTY UTM CSG KM WATER STAT PUMP TEST TEST SCREEN ORINBR CONCESSION HB[d. BASTING BLE® DLA OF POLtM3 L9L LVL RATE TIME WATER FEET LENGTH FOBICATIONS BxTEND ETC LOT BO NORTHING FEET DATE ORILLSR INS HATER FEET FEET FEET GPM HR:W USE FEET PST CONTINUING... ORO TONBSLLLP Coil 09 026 57- 620050 750 1978/05 3135 05 FR 0202 6 62 6 Do --- BLCX LOAM 0001 BELfIDt CLAY 3377.9 0014 i.R6Y CLAY 15906 4924050 STNS 4054 GREY CLAY GR9L $PAW 01$8 OR" GRVL COB 09 026 57- 620400 725 1978/07 3660 OS PR 0177 BL.W TO 30 Iota DO 1532E 4924700 COR 09 026 57- 620000 730 1978/07 3660 05 FR 0220 12 210 7 2 :0 DO 15363 4924000 CON 09 026 57- 619900 750 1977104 1452 05 PR 0058 24 42 7 1 :0 DO 9060 03 14138 4923900 CON 09 026 57- 619944- 1988/06 5218 06 PR 0207 15 70 15 1 :0 DO 23656 4924231 COY 09 026 57- 619950 735 1970)08 4713 06 PR 0205 FLR 20 10 2 :30 DO 07626 4923944 CON 09 026 57- 620100 725 1970/49 4816 06 PR 0213 FLU 14 30 2 :0 DO 07644 4923954 COB 09 026 57- 620200 725 1971/45 3203 05 PR 0097 FL41 25 5 2 :30 DO 07997 4924454 CW7 09 026 57- 620380 725 1911107 1204 05 U% 0177 rl.W 12 20 1 :9 DO 06217 4924760 Cow 09 026 57- 619944- 1989105 2513 25483 ;924231 caw 09 026 57- 620362 72S 1971109 4713 06 FR 0178 PLV 40 20 2 :0 DO 48543 4924611 cart 09 026 57- 620200 725 1912/01 4713 06 PR 0106 FLY 90 8 2 :30 DO 08787 4924470 CON 09 026 S7- 620210 730 1975107 2514 06 LOL 0018 7 30 5 3 :8 DO 13116 4934600 COb7 09 026 57- 619850 750 1972148 1204 05 PR 0221 80 7 1 :15 DO 0221 04 09216 4923750 Cc" 09 026 57- 620526 725 1972/03 4713 06 PR 0064 7 50 10 2 :0 DO 09677 4924430 Cr2N 04 026 57- 619944- 1987111 2513 06 PR 0187 PLW 155 10 1 :30 DO 0194 03 22696 4924231 CON 09 026 57- 620100 725 1974112 3203 05 PR 0204 MW 60 1 48:0 DO 12052 4924050 CLAY CKM 0202 GREY GRVL SAND %BAG 0202 BLCB LOAM 0003 BMW CLAY 0412 GREY 'CLAY BLDB 0090 GREY SAND DRY 9140 BLUE CLbY 0161 EBWn GRVL SAND IAW 0177 GREY LAM 0187 PROD 4076 GREY GRVL 0100 GREY CLAY STNS 0185 BLUR CLAY Ux" 0192 GREY CLAY SOFT 0198 GREY GRVL CMTO 0210 6RWN FSND CMTD 0210 BRWS FILL CLAY SABIT 0002 DRUM CLAT SANG SLOB 0022 GREY CLAY SAND STNS 0031 GREY GRVL CLILT 0039 GREY CLAY SAND RiM 0040 BRWN GM SAND 0063 BERN SAND FILL SOFT 0002 GREY CLAY STNS SOFT 0199 GRUY 73PAN ST-N& Svr"i 4235 G;L-"r PCKD 0207 BLUR CL^V STNS GRVL 0200 BRWU GEVL MSND 0205 CLAY GRVL 0188 CLAY STNS 0200 LMSN 0215 BLCK LOAM 0091 SEWN CLAY SAND SLDR 0010 GREY CLAY BLOB 0023 GREY CLAY GRVL 0097 PRDG 0031 GREY CLAY GRVL STNS 0177 SEWN CLAY STNS 0024 BLUE CLAY STNS 0086 HLUE CLAY MSNO 9176 SEWN GRVL HSND 0178 BLOB CLAY SLUR 0100 BLUE GRVL SP2W 0106 LOAM DECL 0001 BRICK SAND CLAY RUDE. 8010 GREY SILT GRVL BLDR 0050 GREY CLAY SAND SLDR 0172 GREY CLAY SAM 0177 GREY CLAY SAND GRVL 0209 WAN SAND GRVL CLAY 0211 GREY CL" SAND GRVL 0221 BRNN SAM GRVL 0225 BRUN CLAY STNS 0012 BLUE CLAY STBS 0062 EARN GRVL SAND 0064 BRWN CLAY SAND ULM 0010 GREY CLAY SAND BLUR 0118 GREY CLAY 9187 GREY SAND SILT CSND 4297 SEWN CLAY SM 0011 GREY CLAY STNS 0083 GREY CLAY GRVE. SAND OL74 GREY CLAY SILT LYRD 0204 GREY SAND GRVL BBRA 0205 GREY CLAY 0205 •t (L1 CD t-i (n -7 ITS Ln -A E L'1 A t, Q� tl} W -D -.3 m r WATER WELL DATA SYSTEM Aug 11 2004 PAGE: 15 COLM"i SIMCOS GROUND WAT3R BULLETIN REPORT MUNICIPALITY UTM CSG X3ND WATER STAY PUM T'BST TEST SCRREN CmFjt CONCESSION WELL BASTING ELEV DIA OF FOUND 16VL LVL RATE TIM HATER DEPTH LENGTH DSPTMS IN PERT TO WHICH RTC LOT NO WORTHING FEET DATE DRILLER INS V T6R FRET FEET VEET GPM VK;M 1138E PERT FRET FORKATIONS EXTEND CONTINUING... ORO TOWNSHIP CON 09 026 57- 619700 750 1974/10 3203 05 PR 0157 15 75 6 S :0 DO 0157 03 - -- 11638 4923700 SEEN LOAN 0001 Him CLAY STNS 0007 am CLAY STNS 0087 GREY CLAY SAND OL57 DOM SAM WORG 0160 CON 09 D26 57- 619700 725 1977/63 4241 06 PR 0207 FLS 12 3 14 DO --- 14130 4924100 SRwm SANG QRVL STRs 0017 GREY SAND CLAY GRVL 0175 Him FSRD .MGVL 0185 GREY CLAY SNUY 0204 EARN Ksm PGm 0210 CON 09 026 57- 620488 720 1973/11 4713 06 PR 0110 FLW 5 60 2 :30 DO - -- 10728 4924714 BLCK LOAM BLDR E,O05 0005 BLUR CLAY BLDR DNSE 0109 BRWK GRVL SAND LOOS 0110 OON 09 026 57- 619944- 1988/05 2513 06 FR 0185 FIX 60 10 1 :4 DO - -- 23344 4924231 BRvN CLAY 0005 GREY CLXY SILT BLUR 0134 GREY CLAY 0162 GREY SILT SAND HARD 0176 BONN LMSN SMG8 0188 CON 09 026 57- 620016 725 1973/03 4608 30 FR 0038 29 30 45 0 :30 DO - -- 10464 4924127 BRUN STNS CLAY 0020 GRBY ST"S CLAY 0048 OOH4 09 027 57- 619729 2003/05 1851 --- 37637 492!550 Ct1N 09 027 57- 619775 730 1944/08 4713 06 FR 0206 FIX 40 20 2 :0 00 -�- 03352 4921410 PRDG 0,256 CLAY STNS 0045 KXK 0085 WAM CLAY MSW 0204 GRVL 0206 CON 09 027 57- 619950 720 1974102 1204 05 FR 0190 5 170 4 3 :4 DO 0151 03 --- 10783 4923750 BRW CLAY SAM BLDR 0042 BRWW GRVL CLAY SAM 0050 GARY CLAY GRVL BLnx 0060 GREY CLAY GRVL 0140 BRN9 SAM GRVL 0195 CON 09 027 57- 619730- 1930/06 S528 06 PR 0215 127 8 30:0 00 - -- 26846 4923544 _ GREY CLAY GRNL. TILL 0018 easy CLAY STNS 0134 GREY CLAY SILT 0154 GREY CLAY STNS 0194 BRAN SAND CSND 0197 GREY CLAY GRVL 0201 GREY CLAY LHIISH 0215 GRVL CTTPD 0220 CON 09 027 57- 619729- 1999102 1852 06 FR 0212 16 as 6 52: no --- 34149 4923510 88AN CLAY BLJM 0036 GREY CLAY BLUR 0135 RED GRNP 0138 GPXY CLAY BLUR 0183 BRXK SAND CKTD 0200 SM UNON PCRD 0205 OR" LMSN 02L2 CON 09 027 57- 619730- 1988/08 2513 06 PR 0088 ?IN 10 1 :0 DO 0088 --- 23784 4923544 BRUN SAM CEAY HUM 0004 GREY CLAY SILT SAND 0095 CON 09 027 57- 619730- 1917/09 1583 06 FR 0214 23 LL3 8 2 :30 DO --- 33102 4923544 HR%K LGAM 0002 GREY CLAY SAND 0085 GREY CLAY 0201 GRRY LMSN FCHD 0214 CON 09 027 57- 619800 725 1973102 3203 05 PR 0201 6 20 4 3 :0 DO - -- 09730 4923350 FROG 0011 Gtii6Y CLAY GRVL STNS 0130 GREY CLAY 0194 GREY GM CLAY ULM 0201 GREY t3RVL, CMTD WIMS 0201 Calf 09 027 57- 619#00 725 1974/11 3203 45 UK 0215 14 90 8 11:0 DO - -- - 12063 4923250 BRXN LOAM 0001 BRWK GRVL. SAND 0026 BRX" CLAY 0035 GREY CLAY STNS 0130 GREY GRVL SAND CLAY 0178 GREY CLAY-0214 LMSK 0215 CON 09 027 57- 619700 745 1976/08 3203 45 FR 0189 20 80 5 2 :30 110 019L 01 - -- 14200 4913610 BLCX LOAN 0002 BRVK CLAY STNS 0009 GREY CLAY STNS 0120 GREY CLAY 0189 GREY GRVL SAND CLAY - 0192 GREY GKVL SAND 0194 CLAY 0194 CON 09 027 57- 619729 2003/05 1851 46 Flt 0212 16 45 12 6 :0 DO 0212 03 --- 37838 4523550 -. - LOAM 0002 GREY CLAY CHM 0191 GREY CLAY "HE _ 0212 MEN SAND CMTO 0215 N to F+ 111 -L p QO �tJ m tft i- rj A EFz N til tit kD t-� tit QV) U1 ILdno 0-- f ft— Environment Print only In spaces provilied. Mark correct box with & ched(mark, where applicable. i tic unrarto water Hesources Act WATER WELL RECORD t Oor Con T County or District Townshlpftm4tVOhwTownMlagaf block Ira C, a 0 r2cl (7, 1 19 Owner's surname First Name Address Date 7—r 7W ;,I) /4-, we 'd 0 e,� -, r Completed Y 1 11 1 1 day month stir LOG OF OVERBURDEN AND BEDROCK MATERIALS fees Instructions) General colour Most common material Other materials General description Lie D In • fast 71 1-7 To Minerals ❑ Sally dues Inch" C3 Gas Chid notes Inches 0 Fresh '-Aj�S`4Ph-, T I ., u Sally 0 Minor" --T ❑ Gas 15 rpouls. 0 Fresh ❑ Sulphur c7 0 say 0 Matter" 0 commercial e' L W/ 1) Stock ❑ Fo,, 0 sulphur V2 Sorry n Mirsl. 0 Public supply I-f-- Po LIL test IV 7 /1 sally 0 MIM-16 feel ❑ Ga. ❑ Gelvandod if fiamg gner, rate Pump Wake sal at wale, at and of wet ❑ Rotary (corwantionso _�Lt 1, y— 6. tvii Ve L lfit.0 r clear ❑ Cloudy 0 Dianww R,corornandad Pump M. 0 Open no" C) Joan [I Shallow 0 Deep I puns, 6"fall -, Plastic " , / feet r." GPM steal 1, it L Gaharil,red O concrete 1-i Giant hot. WATER RECORD Water found at feet Kind of water 0f.—,p"Q Pr Fresh ❑ Sulphur De p 'h Minerals ❑ Sally dues Inch" C3 Gas Chid notes Inches 0 Fresh '-Aj�S`4Ph-, T I ., u Sally 0 Minor" M sew ❑ Gas 15 rpouls. 0 Fresh ❑ Sulphur 45 rokAss. 0 say 0 Matter" 0 commercial El Gas Stock ❑ Fo,, 0 sulphur rj pietio. Sorry n Mirsl. 0 Public supply ❑ Gas test ❑ From 0 Sulphur rest sally 0 MIM-16 feel ❑ Ga. AStNG & o EN HOLE RECORD inside 0f.—,p"Q WAA De p 'h -'*$I dues Inch" Matelot I Chid notes Inches F. T I t7! M sew 15 rpouls. Me.". 45 rokAss. El Galvanized 0 concrat. 0 open hot. 0 commercial 0 Not ties Stock 0 M-tc1pal rj pietio. 4 0 Public supply test O State rest fool feel wet ❑ Gelvandod if fiamg gner, rate Pump Wake sal at wale, at and of wet ❑ Rotary (corwantionso 0 concrale 0 closing clear ❑ Cloudy 0 Dianww R,corornandad Pump M. 0 Open no" C) Joan [I Shallow 0 Deep I puns, 6"fall -, Plastic " , / feet r." GPM steal Gaharil,red O concrete 1-i Giant hot. -0 —t❑ Plastic FINAL STATUS OF WELL Purt"19 toot -".d Pumping Me 0f.—,p"Q ❑ Abandoned 0111011101661 Supply ❑ Pump t'K Baker /[7 GPM L'a. Mite ❑ Replace-nit Wall Static loot ovate, W and of pumping wine, levels dunn,; 0 P-Ov 0 Floc-ory t7! ❑ Gawatering 15 rpouls. Me.". 45 rokAss. so m *V t" 0 commercial 0 Not ties Stock 0 M-tc1pal Dods, 4 0 Public supply test fast rest fool feel wet if fiamg gner, rate Pump Wake sal at wale, at and of wet ❑ Rotary (corwantionso GPM 0 closing clear ❑ Cloudy 0 Dianww R,corornandad Pump M. Rec-retntled C) Joan [I Shallow 0 Deep I puns, 6"fall -, dune, ofle " , / feet r." GPM FINAL STATUS OF WELL ;4 all Conte. Licence No' jot Wale, Supply ❑ Abandoned 0111011101661 Supply 0 UnfiNshed Obs-11- -til 0 Abandoned: poor quality ❑ Replace-nit Wall C) T... hole 0 Abandoned (Other) Sbrrvittslon data day .. Y( ❑ Recharge wail ❑ Gawatering WATER USE Domestic 0 commercial 0 Not ties Stock 0 M-tc1pal Dods, 0 briflation 0 Public supply ❑ Indust" 0 cooling & sk conditioning METHOD OF CONSTRUCTION N Cable too Cl Air percussion 0 DrMng ❑ Rotary (corwantionso ❑ Baring 0 closing ❑ Rotary �nwwlet 0 Dianww D Other F3 Rotary {air) C) Joan N.- of Wall Conotei., cc-)VA /xv ;4 all Conte. Licence No' Address Oepm at too of screen uj Nan -a Wall Technichin 0 Annular space ❑ Abandonment Wed TachiNcitine Linares N., 7 Signature a eclpnk tar Sbrrvittslon data day .. Y( z 3 - OWNER'S COPY des of opening z (Slot No.) Diameter inches Larva, 7z feel CC Material And type Oepm at too of screen uj PLUGGING & SEALING RECORD 0 Annular space ❑ Abandonment Depth set at • teal Mate rial and "(Content Woul, bentonho, sic.) �TM----r To LOCATION OF WELL :n diagram below show distances of well from road and lot line. ndicate north by arrow. L i t L ii 210422 z 0- uj (1) UbUb P 11") rmol Tama