Loading...
10 22 2007 PAC AgendaTOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA Robinson Room Date Mondav October 22 2007 Time: 7:00 o.m. Opening of Meeting by Chair 2. Adoption of Agenda 3. Declaration of Pecuniary Interest and the General Nature Thereof - in Accordance with the Act 4. Minutes of Previous Meetings -September 24, 2007 5. Planning Applications (a) Memorandum presented by Bruce Hoppe, Director of Building and Planning Services, Re: Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment for CRA Development (Tim Crawford), Concession 9, Part of Lot 26 (Oro), south side of Springhome Road Applications 2004-OPA-03 and 2004- ZBA-04 (b) Planning Report presented by Bruce Hoppe, Director of Building and Planning Services, Re: Application for Rezoning for Laurel View Homes Inc. (Jerry Leiderman), Blocks 67, 68, 69 & 70, Plan 51 M-741, Conc. 4, Part Lots 3 & 4 (Oro), Township of Oro-Medonte (c) Planning Report presented by Bruce Hoppe, Director of Building and Planning Services, Re: Proposed Plan of Subdivision and Rezoning, James and Kimberley Drury, West Part of Lot 11, Concession 5 (Oro), Township of Oro-Medonte, 1099 OId Barrie Road West, Applications 2006-SUB-02 and 2006-ZBA-04 (Applicant to be afforded an opportunity to speak to the application subsequent to the review of the report) 6. Correspondence and Communication None 7. Other Business (a) Policy review/input from Planning Advisory Committee -discussion of priorities and topic refinement 8. Adjournment la a 13 TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE ~ ~ ~ _ 4 MOTION# PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE MINUTES OCT ~ 0 2~~~ 2006-2010 TERM MEETING: COUNCIL September 24, 2007, 7:02 p.m. Council Chambers , C. OFW.~ Present: Council Representatives Public Representatives Mayor H.S. Hughes Linda Babulic Deputy Mayor Ralph Hough Roy Hastings Councillor Mel Coutanche Tom Kurtz Councillor Terry Allison Mary O'Farrell-Bowers Councillor Sandy Agnew Larry Tupling Councillor John Crawford Councillor Dwight Evans Staff Present: Bruce Hoppe, Director of Building and Planning Services; Glenn White, Senior Planner; Janette Teeter, Clerk's Assistant Also Present: Bernd Schaefers; Carol Schaefers; J. Schaefers; Kristine Loft, The Jones Consulting Group; Jamie Nairn, Michalski Neilson Associates; Trudy Paterson, Skelton Brumwell & Associates Inc.; Tim Crawford 1. Opening of Meeting by Chair. Deputy Mayor Hough assumed the chair and called the meeting to order. 2. Adoption of Agenda. Motion No. PAC070924-1 Moved by Tom Kurtz, Seconded by Roy Hastings It is recommended that the agenda for the Planning Advisory Committee meeting of Monday, September 24, 2007 be received and adopted. Carried. 3. Declaration of Pecuniary Interest and the General Nature Thereof - in Accordance with the Act. None declared. ~3b - 4. Minutes of Previous Meetings -July 30, 2007. Motion No. PAC070924-2 Moved by Tom Kurtz, Seconded by Linda Babulic It is recommended that the minutes of the Planning Advisory Committee Meeting held on July 30, 2007 be received and adopted. Carried. 5. Planning Applications. a) Planning Report presented by Bruce Hoppe, Director of Building and Planning Services, re: Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment for Jules Goossens, Concession 10, Part of Lot 25 (Oro}, east side of Line 9 South, Applications 2005- OPA-04 and 2005-ZBA-27. Kristine Loft, The Jones Consulting Group, distributed a larger version of the map similar to the agenda copy, Figure B, Project Number 4304. Motion No. PAG070924-3 Moved by Larry Tupling Seconded by Mary O'Farrell-Bowers It is recommended that 1. Report No. BP 2007-037, presented by Bruce Hoppe, Director of Building and Planning Services re: Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment for Jules Goossens, Part of Lot 25, Concession 10 (Oro), Township of Oro-Medonte, 38 Poplar Drive be received and adopted. 2. And Further That it is Recommended to Council That Official Plan and Zoning By- law Amendment Applications 2005-OPA-04 and 2005-ZBA-27, Part of Lot 25, Concession 10 (Oro}, Township of Oro-Medonte, 38 Poplar Drive, (Jules Goossens) proceed to a Public Meeting in accordance with the provisions of the Planning Act. Carried. Planning Advisory Committee Meeting September 24, 2007, Page 2 b) Memorandum presented by Bruce Hoppe, Director of Building and Planning Services; re: Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment for CRA Development (Tim Crawford), Concession 9, Part of Lot 26 {Oro), south side of Springhome Road Applications 2004-OPA- 03 and 2004-ZBA-04. {{ Motion No. PAC070924-4 ( `r tq ^ `^; Moved by Mary O'Farrell-Bowers, Seconded by Linda Babulic It is recommended that the Official Plan and Zoning By-Law Amendment for CRA Development (Tim Crawford}, Conc. 9, Part of Lot 26 (Oro), South Side of Springhome Road be deferred to the next Planning Advisory Committee meeting to allow staff and the applicant to submit a revised plan with respect to Lots 1-6 consistent with the .6 hectare minimum outlined in the Official Plan. Carried. Motion No. PAC070924-5 Moved by Roy Hastings, Seconded by Linda Babulic It is recommended that 1. The following correspondence presented by Bruce Hoppe, Director of Building. and Planning Services re Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment for CRA Development (Tim Crawford), Concession 9, Part of Lot 26 (Oro), Township of Oro-Medonte, south side of Springhome Road be received: • memorandum correspondence from Bruce Hoppe, dated September 21, 2007, • correspondence dated September 17, 2007 from Jackie Burkart, Senior Planner, Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority, and • memorandum correspondence dated September 13, 2007 from Shawn Binns, Manager of Recreation and Community Services. That it is Recommended to Council That Official Plan Amendment (2004-OPA-03) and Zoning By-law Amendment Application (2004-ZBA-04) be approved for Lots 1 to 6, as outlined in the Preliminary Lot Development Plan dated August 31, 2007 by Skelton Brumwell & Associates Inc., for CRA Development (Tim Crawford), that would designate lands described as Concession 9, Part of Lot 26 (Oro), Township of Oro-Medonte, on Schedule A of the Official Plan from Rural and Environmental Protection Two Overlay Designations to Shoreline, and rezone (ands on Schedule A5 of the Zoning By-law 97-95 from Agricultural/Rural (A/RU) to Shoreline Residential (SR) Zone, subject to a Holding (H) Zone, removal of which shall only be done after an appropriate Site Plan Agreement has been entered into regarding the preservation of trees and timing of site development. 3. That Official Plan Amendment (2004-OPA-03) and Zoning By-law Amendment Application (2004-ZBA-04) be approved for Block 7, as outlined in the Preliminary Lot Development Plan dated August 31, 2007 by Skelton Brumwell & Associates Inc., for GRA Development (Tim Crawford), that would designate lands described as Concession 9, Part of Lot 26 (Oro), Township of Oro-Medonte, on Schedule A of the Official Plan from Rural and Environmental Protection Two Overlay Designations to Environmental Protection Two Overlay Designations, and rezone lands on Schedule A5 of the Zoning By-law 97-95 from AgriculturallRural (A/RU) to Environmental Protection (EP) Zone. Deferred. Planning AtlviSOry Committee Meeting September 24, 2007. Page 3 6. Correspondence and Communication. ~ ~ ~~ ~~ a) General Discussion Regarding Scheduling of Public Planning Meetings. , Motion No. PAC070924-6 Moved by Larry Tupling, Seconded by Mary O'Farrell-Bowers It is recommended that the verbal information presented by Bruce Hoppe, Director of Building and Planning Services re: Scheduling of Public Planning Meetings be received. Carried b) Craighurst Secondary Plan -Public Open House. Motion No. PAC070924-7 Moved by Mary O'Farrell-Bowers, Seconded by Larry Tupling It is recommended that the verbal information and correspondence dated September 12, 2007 presented by Bruce Hoppe, Director of Building and Planning Services re: Craighurst Secondary Plan -Public Open House be received. Carried. 7. Other Business. a) Policy Review/Input from Planning Advisory Committee. Motion No. PAC070924-8 Moved by Roy Hastings, Seconded by Linda Babulic It is recommended that the verbal information and correspondence dated August 23, 2007 presented by Bruce Hoppe, Director of Building and Planning Services re: Policy Reviewllnput from Planning Advisory Committee be received. Carried. Planning Atlvisory Committee Meeting September 24, 2007, Page 4 8. Adjournment. Motion No. PAC070924-9 Moved by Linda Babulic, Seconded by Larry Tupling it is recommended that we do now adjourn at 10:12 p.m. ~~ u'~ Carried. Chair, Deputy Mayor Ralph Hough Director of Building and Planning Services, Bruce Hoppe Planning Atlvisory Gommitiee Meeting September 24, 2007. Page 5 TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE ,~ , ~;~ ~p x `~°~ 'dA> TO: Planning Advisory Committee FROM: Bruce Hoppe, MCIP, RPP Director of Building and Planning Services DATE: October 22, 2007 SUBJECT: Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment CRA Development (Tim Crawford) Part of Lot 26, Concession 9 (Oro) Springhome Road (south side) Files: 2004-OPA-03 and 2004-ZBA-04 Further to the PAC meeting of September 21, 2007, the matter was deferred as the request of the Committee due to concerns respecting the size of the proposed lot sizes. The plan considered at the September PAC meeting is attached to this Memorandum as Appendix A. The applicant has since met with staff and submitted two alternative plans for the Committee's consideration. These alternative plans are enclosed as Appendices B and C respectively. Also enclosed is a summary chart labelled as Appendix D as well as a general location plan Appendix E, which illustrates the lot pattern in the general vicinity of the subject property. As previously indicated by staff, the issue of lot area (as well as all numerical references) in the Official Plan are open to interpretation, provided that the overall intent of the Plan is maintained. It is important to review the entire Official Plan and to assess the intent when evaluating compliance. Specifically, Section C 17.7.1 (d) of the Official Plan states as follows: "Minor Variations from numerical requirements in the Plan maybe permitted without and Amendment provided that the general i»tent of the Plan is maintained." As Committee is aware, staff support for the plan attached as Appendix A was articulated in Report BP 2007-028 presented to PAC in July. While the staff preference remains unchanged, an analysis of the two most recent amendments follows. Appendix B has been amended to adjust the lot frontages and depths to meet the 6000 square metre minimum lot area, which in essence has been gained by slightly adjusting both the lot depth and frontages. While the minimum lot area has been achieved, the proposed EP block to the south has been reduced from 4.6 ha to 3.5 ha. Further, an irregular rear lot line for lot 5 has resulted which is not desirable. While no development is contemplated to the rear of the lots, each lot has been extended closer to the natural heritage features, which is more significant for Lots 1 and 2. To address the lot 5 geometry, Appendix C represents another iteration of the plan. Due to the shape of the subject property and surrounding lot patterns, Appendix C attempts to maximize the area of the EP block, and creates a more regularly shaped lot pattern. This version results in an EP block area comprising 3.8 ha, however, while Lot 1 is 0.68 ha, Lots 2-6 are 0.54 ha in size. R s ectfully submitted, ~~ Br ce Hoppe, MC , RPP Director of Building and Planning Services ~~, _ _ X07 ~.~ _ ., ;1 ~~~~ ~~ r~~ ~ _ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ___ _ _ __ _ _ , . 11 __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __. ~1 '.a . a __._ --9RlG1NtlL-~Bk8~14f#~EFAM&E:~EEF1YEEfd-iQIS2i+-AN8-2b---(SF?&JOlCili0A1~R4AQ]_ "' ~~~~ r __- J ..- ~_ ~- .Sm FFl~i~li-(IYP~. _ _ __ f Ofi.40 •. ~-•~•!v9$00 `5~y W l M >.W U W o ; ~- ---~~ ~ -~ ~ ~'-o-j ~=o~ r ~ ~ ~-, 3 D ~ ~ ~ _- ~ \ O 4. 1 _J J ~ ~~ ~~ 11 ~ ° r _ ~ 7.6m EA~ ~7ARD w _ ~ _1 .r- ~ ` ~ .~ ~ ~, ~~~ % ~ ~ N ~ / ~ '."' 4 \ { ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~. Yom./' / \ ~ \\ mil ~ _ _ to ` \ ~ ~ ~ ~ "+-.._..,_ E~I VIRONMENTAL ~ CO RESI6Hd'TIAL ' ~ ~` "PROTECTION =` ~~ ;i ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~, j ~ _ BLOCK 7 (4.6'~Fha) t ~ . ~,__ , ~ _ . _L w ~ ' y ~\ .~ u l ( ~ ' ~. 1 ~' ~ ~`~ ~ \ ~ i A I ~ 4 '~ 3 _ ~_ Y ~_~~. ~ ~ _`'1~ ~/~ /- Lam'` l~ ~~LJ '\ i .' ~ (t "~ f. ~~ ' VACANT ~_ _ ,-~--~ ~ _ ~ y \ ._-_~- ~ a ~~ _~ ._~~ - ,, _ , r---r CRAW FORD LOTS PROPERTY BOUNDARY 1. _ _ J ORO-MEDONTE O PROPOSED LOT LINES FIGURE 2 PRELIMINARY LOT DEVELOPMENT PLAN BUILDING ENVELOPE 1:2000 TYPICAL RESIDENCE P/N 1892 SEPT 2006 (2150 sq.ft) © $ktlWll$il11IIWC]i i 6TfOCt AT FS IPoC TYPICAL SEWAGE BED coNSUUTiNC eNCiNEERS ~ auNrvEres UM Yrf 1 f0] bARI F 0. ~ - ~1 36-OJ]f lF1EPHONE (l65) ] 26 116 PS) A~'AE.nidtk `~q' .~ ORIGINAL ROAD ALLOWANCE BETWEEN LOTS 25 AND 26 (SPRINGHOME ROAD) N59't 8'50E 35a.93m r - - - - - ,- - 599 5>A - - - - - - - 5l0 5].0 - - - - - - - -, 82.8 6].2 D' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' e n ~ ' . ~ ~ ~i~ 3 4 5 6 ym a ¢ : ~ £~ m m m ' ~p~ .. ~ ~ N59'09'OOE 714.Om G' ~ ~ m ~ q ~ ~ ~ T~R ~.. CO ~~ ~~ ~ ~ Fo- _. _. ~_ ~ , p~S ~ ` ~, n ~ z E M y" . s ~ _ RESIDENTIAL ~ GW~.. N ~ g ~. ~_, ENVIRONMENTAL ~ ' - ~ ~~~ '~ ~ ~= PROTECTION `'~ ~ ~ ~, z BLOCK 7 (3.54ha) , -~ .~ "`WA TERCOURSE ~ '- ~ a ,~ ~„-r - ' N59'09'OOE 240.23m - - - --- - J _. _. _.- -:-. V VACANT 1 ~ ~~ PROPERTY BOUNDARY .,ursxr~f,,.. SIGNIFICANT WILDLIFE HABITAT -`- ~~ (YELLOW-BREASTED CHAT) p ~+ CRQW ~QR~ L~TS ~ ~(, ORO-MEDONTE PROPOSED LOT LINES WATERCOURSES (FISH FIAeIT AT) SIGNIFICANT wILDUFE 'w `~` ILLUSTRATION OF 0.6ha HABITAT BUFFER TYPICAL RESIDENCE -- WATERCOURSE BUFFER LOT CONFIGURATON (2150 sq.ft) LOT SIZES ~: 2~~~ ~X TYPICAL SEWAGE BED P/N 1892 ocT ta, zoa~ LOT 1-6 0.60ha Skelton Bramwell © BLOCK 7 3.54ha CONSULTING ENGINEERS & PLANNERS p uu w p ra u rexM xm . sane +02 X n 9iF1iMOXE (]p5) ]2B-Iftf cpy„ ()09) '12B-C9]1 P-~~1b~x ' g' Y ORIGINAL ROAD ALLOWANCE BETWEEN LOTS 25 AND 26 (SPRINGHOME ROAD) N59'18'SOE 356 93m 7.5m FRONT YARD (TYP) . of J!.B ~0 X~ SJ.O I~-' 5J.0 I-Q ~ 57.0 (-~~ - I SJ,O ~- I r- 5-/"Q ~ ~ I I ) 1~ ~:. ~ ( 1~ O E%T l U X ~ ) ~ YI ~ I ~ I I ~ I ~ Y a ~ y . m . SIDE YARD ~ I I m m o' : ~ M 1 ,.. ( I I I r h~ ml° 1 w .y~ ~ ~ ( ~ 3 F) ~ 4 ( I 5 ~ ~ 6 ~ rF - E Z C I O ].Sm REA= YARD ~ ~~ N59'09'OOE 714.Om ae.. n C lr. ~" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~'i,~, .. _ ~ ~~ ~L _' ' R 3 ~ ~, , ~ ~ ~ ~~Se ., 1 z E m _" ~ '' e - 1 RESIDENTIAL o N c ` ~° •'` ' i ~~. _ L . _ _ . _. __ 3 0 ~ ~ ~ uT ENVIRONMENTAL 1 ~ ,.. ~ PROTECTION .r _ , ~ BLOCK 7 (3.78ha) ~ WATERCOURSE ,~ A 1 ,~ N ~, .. J N 59'09'OOE 240.23m - "- VACANT %' SIGNIFICANT WILDLIFE NABI7AT 1 i PROPERTY BOUNCARY ,' (YELLOW-BREASTED cr+AT) _,` ... r CRAWFORD LOTS _ ORO-MEDONTE WATERCOURSES (FISH HABITAT) '~ PROPOSED LOT LINES _ SIGNIFICANT WILDLIFE ' "~ FIGURE 2A HABITAT BUFFER " L ~ BUILDING ENVELOPE WATERCOURSE BUFFER PRELIMINARY L07 DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1:2000 TYPICAL RESIDENCE LOT SIZES (2150 sq.ft) 0 68h P/N 1892 REV. OCT 2, 2007 ~X TYPICAL SEWAGE BED . a LOT 1 c `_~,'' © Skelton BfuIIIW~ LOTS 2 - 6 0.54ha 6 A S 1 1 6 S A i 5 1 C OVERALL AVERAGE 0.57ho CONSULTING ENGINEERS & PLANNERS sa ecu Eaeu AAno. swJC ion awmE, oxrunA uM w~ iEtFPNWE ()05) ]R6-111 fPN. (JAS) ]36-03]1 APP~Er~-X "c' Crawford Lots - Oro-Medonte COMPARISON OF LOT DEVELOPMENT PLANS A B C Prelim. Lot Development Illustration of 0.6 ha Lot Prelim. Lot Development Plan Aug 31/07 * Configuration** Plan Oct 2/07 ** Lot 1 0.47 0.6 0.68 Lot 2 0.45 0.6 0.54 Lot 3 0.46 0.6 0.54 Lot 4 0.45 0.6 0.54 Lot 5 0.45 0.6 0.54 Lot 6 0.48 0.6 0.54 Total Lot Area 2.76 3.6 3.39 Average Lot Area 0.46 0.6 0.57 Block 7 4.41 3.57 3.78 Total Site Area 7.17 7.17 7.17 * Reviewed by Oro-Medonte Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) Sept 24/07 ** To be presented to PAC Oct 22/07 Minimum Lot Area Requirements: Official Plan Policy C 5.3.4 a) 0.6 ha Policy C 17.7.1 d) "Minor Variations liom numerical requirements in the Plan may be permitted without an Amendment provided that the general intent of the Pian is maintained." Zoning By-law -Table Bl SR -Shoreline Residential Zone 0.2 ha Skelton, Bramwell & Associates Inc. October 18, 2007 P/I~ 041892 P-~Eti101~C ~O~ O -... rn Y w a a. J W O U ~~i W Y J ~ z _ y 4 f~~.~ ~ , t ~,..~ ` ~. ' t.r ~ ~`~ ` ~~ ~. ~~ ~ A ~ ' ~ \~"..~~ ~ a. may, ~ h `%'+..~ J ~ c`~~ ~ `fit ~C ~ ~ _ i ~~ ~~ i~ Y ~~~~^ TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE REPORT Dept. Report No. To: Prepared By: BP 2007-042 Planning Advisory Committee Glenn White, MCIP, RPP Subject: Department: Council Application for Rezoning - Building & Planning Laurel View Homes Inc. (Jerry C. of W. Leiderman), Blocks 67, 68, 69 Date: & 70, Plan 51M-741, Conc. 4, October 19, 2007 Motion # Part Lots 3 & 4 (Oro), R.M. File #: Township of Oro-Medonte Application # 2006-ZBA-12 Date: Roll #: 010-002-21714, 010-. 002-21824, 010-002-21796, 010-002-21756 BACKGROUND: Zoning Amendment Application 2006-ZBA-12 was originally considered by Committee of the Whole on November 22, 2006 with a recommendation that the application be scheduled for a Public Meeting pursuant to section 34 of the Planning Act. The public hearing was held on February 14, 2007. This report provides discussion regarding issues raised at the public meeting and makes recommendation for the further disposition of the application. The intent of the application is to rezone the subject lands within the above noted property from Residential One (R1`140) to asite-specific Environmental Protection zone. The subject lands are currently vacant and per the subdivision agreement serve as servicing easement blocks. The subject lands are located within Phase 1 of the Landscapes of Horseshoe subdivision which consists of 66 single detached dwellings. The application affects four blocks within the registered plan of subdivision, all of which are owned by Laurel View Homes Inc. Blocks 67 and 70 are sanitary easement blocks in favour of AWS Canada Corp whose responsibility is to manage the sanitary sewage treatment facility, while Blocks 68 and 69 are listed as stormwater management blocks in the subdivision agreement. The lands affected by this application are indicated on Attachment #1 attached hereto. OFFICIAL PLAN The subject lands form part of the Horseshoe Valley Resort Node, which are intended to provide a range of land uses including residential, commercial and recreational uses on full sewer and water services. The Official Plan designates the subject lands as Horseshoe Valley Low Density Residential. Section 85.1.6 of the Official Plan deals with Water Resource and Stormwater Management Reports policies. Within Section B5.1.6.2, there is policy which states all storm water management facilities in a Plan of Subdivision shall be placed in the Environmental Protection Zone in the implementing Zoning by-law to reflect the potential for these lands to be flooded and to ensure that their intended use is recognized. ANALYSIS The application requests asite-specific EP Zone, as the Township's Zoning By-law contains a general provision which requires a 30 metre setback from an EP Zone boundary. This is normally incidental to a watercourse or other significant natural feature in which case the By-law protects this feature by establishing a setback from the feature. In this instance, there are residential dwellings in close proximity to these blocks therefore the applicant is requesting relief from the 30 metre setback so as not to preclude dwellings (or additions thereto), sheds, pools etc. Moreover, the blocks in question are man-made facilities therefore the intent to protect natural features would not be offended. The application has been circulated to internal department and outside agencies. To date no concerns have been expressed. The Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority (NVCA) reviewed the proposed Zoning Amendment application and has no objections to its approval. The NVCA supports stormwater management blocks being placed under Environmental Protection zoning to ensure there long term function. At the February 14, 2007 public meeting, five people identified issues regarding with this application. Staff has received a letter of response from the applicant's Planning consultant addressing the issues. The question of whether Blocks 67 to 70 could be in public ownership. Discussions with Township staff did occur and it was determined that since existing private services as well as golf course access are provided through these blocks of land the conveyance of these blocks to the Township was practical nor feasible. The subdivision agreement provides that the drainage of surface waters from these blocks is the responsibility of the developer and the subsequent owners. The subdivision agreement contains provisions which can be enforced by the regarding appropriate and required maintenance. Regarding the appearance of the lands, the subdivision agreement requires the developer to hydro seed and maintains the (ands. The issue of the (ands being used as parkland and /or open space was raised at the public meeting. These blocks are privately owned and were not dedicated to the Township as part of any parkland. The function of these blocks is for surface drainage and servicing and not for park purposes. The final issues raised at the public meeting were specific concerns related to individual building matters and concerns on individual residential lots within existing development and not related to the above noted Blocks and not related to this proposed zoning amendment application. The proposed Environmental Protection (EP*) Zone for Blocks 67 to 70 would ensure that a residential land use would not occur on the lands which is a potential land use under the current zoning. The proposed rezoning would restrict Blocks 67 to 70 to uses in accordance with the Subdivision agreement. 7 RECOMMENDA On the basis of the above, it is recommended that Planning Advisory Committee recommend to Council: 1. THAT Report 2007-042 (Laurel View Homes Inc.) be received and adopted: 2. THAT Zoning By-law Amendment Application (2006-ZBA-12) be approved for Blocks 67 to '70 of Plan 51 M-741, Laurel View Homes Inc., that would rezone lands on Schedule A15 of the Zoning By-law 97- 95 from Residential One (R1'140) to asite-specific Environmental Protection Zone. 3. AND THAT the Clerk bring forward the above noted Zoning By-law Amendments for Council's approval Respectfully Submitted; Glenn White, MCIP, RPP Senior Planner, Planning Department C.A.O. Comments: Date: C.A.O. Dept. Head Block 67 yp N i'1 ~~ . _ _ Block 69 Block 70 w Z Block 68 $ ~ o ~' Y ~ U`' Q O' Q 1- ^ Lands ubject to rezo ing Blocks 7, 68, 69, 70 Plan 31 -741 ile No. 2006-Z A-12 Laurel View H mes ,~PPENDtX '~' 1',I'UC~ 13ofrtre, tIC ~1', 9~l'1' i)ircetall• ~t t~uilr~in~ ~: ~'ta z! tt in;; ~ier~ ices Ica=,ttxtilaip ~i`C}ro-1~tat4c~le s:J~ [.I l1c 1 ~C>llt11 1.12"t}. t.)ti I?eall' ~'1r. 1Io}?~e, F ~.. _:...,< foe: 1La€xa'~l ~'ietr ELcrec _ f~ezt)ns`I2g :~l~~l!seatin€r {{2(3{i?-7_tf~A-12} I3t+ack~ 67., G~, ~9 70, flan 51;4-7~I fart I1c>ts 3 acrid 4, f"onsessi~ll 4, ~"ffrc'rlshi~a of 4~rf}-i42edontr ..,. , 1'UCI}3v't' 10 t1f.[r TEIi:t:LCSt~? O# .IU.! j' [ ~'',. ~(1(j7 i127y ~i:dt=.2' !5 itlic'17f~e£1 St} ~tlrtunarize thin =J12tt~ rs I2i ;~d at the puC?1tc m4eCiII~ lielcl d)~ ltei~rnzul s <~. ~(7() t tc.:;ardiax~ f[xe ttbi)t c Ix~led3 re~t)Ixi}Irk. i ,~ i . I'shla~ c>~1'Ilcrrslli~ {a?' E3lcxcks C??_7{) - 17i~clticttls 31<l~=e {?ccnrrc;l ~.roitll ..: i' 'i:`' } {}t„'riShl(} ;~f;tlt f121C. *tt'c2l 1112: E:.`{t5(ItTL', ~xI t't"211;. 52rtitt;L':i 2~ Tl'{.ia if:> r.„e?[I i:(3l3.CSe 2GeCtiS F3TC ]7St7'v'7{].i:i~ 111T{)tl L',#Y I}tt'S€' 17It7C~;S L~*1 1:111t~ Y[SE" a#)Ixuev2ltc e ot ttxese bicx~ks T~ Thta "1'cl>~~lat;hil> is Ileitlxcr pa';lctical nur #tasit)le. 'fhu slt,~l~it'isicJn €)~recanelti exec ~t',:u ~~tlt t(li '] c)tn s)~1up is ;", t'crs clear ist ~C{Cit1t1 ~~.4 thzrt th tltatlacc ca€'surfa~e ultes il[~ta=.t a,lcl lratal Thesi tzJs!I)tiiic~i t)Ic,t ks is tlsT stJiG lc.3xc,21siL.ilit~: c>i tlxc t#eYc1~)~teY' aid the stlh+eclTlelxi cls~ners. Il 1~ untielstr,~~ fram 1't)e'~n<hit, ,t..#~' E1aa1 t[zL' tj+:.C11CatdOP z131C#. }C)I?'T 1clTt1 371`dll"1It.t12t2ei tlt llle~'••.e ~~Is=i:.~3 ~:51` i[It' .. . # f3Y}llStllfJ 15 f'.i)1 i~Uil I't:f~, %. 1~22S1tCI2i7i1%t' OIL b}t}t=[cS {[t)i1y? tir 1`171') ~ti tSCl [dCt tlit7k C, t114' `.~L'. C'itJJJt'.7' tti 1'tx1I1~ Ian' ,ul;[i.i:sictsl agreeaxxcll~ }3.t,~'ti;>!ts <ls registered c7r1 tit[' G~1ticEi Gt}nt2isa Illuhltlliss.as Fir' e€~lfc~rccnxen+ b*t lllc 7"ov.rtslxi~ f~?r ~p~rcx~sia[c.'requit eci xlxait,Iellanee. ~;. w1Fx[~ear4l=I.ce cxl' lasxcl:; -,~.hb 4ubcii,isicn} IT,tce:rxr Itt clcs2!'14 ic1<t2tliie~ f,e rr~tuirelaxetl€s aF t11e dc5clnpes tll~Yt file ?ata 4~, a2'e ret}aired to #x:11}=circa ~I., ded falx. ltxail;ltlilxccl hY the rls t ~!c)}per. 1 Isere s1lr ~Il,t, s;le~l.GYlli~;I,x uunt~llzzt<d .,1 tf!e stlildi~ isicln zs~; ectlteFlt which erlxliz ~:ntt}Iec I;sent #~v _ the Tcrl~r~,lli~ slxrxuld 13xis t-~e €tc~ *s<uy. ;.;. ..,_ -?. }e.iktl (}Sall[':: }t)C ~~ttt'12"~iliTlc: crisis[ T't'd)lz`CtlC?tt {1,[}j :Ti?I3lit,r tt"}1(':tl i:.lti<[`.? `sit'u 2lt)1 Slot#lilCiS- fiS :IfktCt[ ar. t5',#i [~}i?t?S2 tIx`? ~E2:lil'SSS ~_dili?l tltt'.i[ tt tt'sl F}tC It,r>#icutit3n. the ('~~a'aslai}a`s f)Iiikltlt 1'lall re~ttiees stY~tq; b1~e~~ ~i'1a!)ci ~tl ~%c. Ct)I,i£3fS;Ci1 ti'it}1111 tile. tt~?h7rf1}}TSilt [,[x4'II'()i3f)l I)t:11 tiik)ti`4t~`,itrl L{>It;'. >' its The illx~;cltlerltirlK„; ,=ixtaan~ tx.-(~x,~ in r>ISIc! la seflc°c t ?Ile ,,t ~Lllii2l lies' . ,... ,.. t}et'Sl' #2x 21 C1 `+ ={x 't'IC T7t)t tt(iti 7.ald~ tt t`3]tiLia'G'. tl 3,ltt:'17G4u t14c'. ~# i {e (,3E1C#;: i4 r,.a a=r+tired. A P~~Nt~r~( '~' L '~ ~2. 1=rt~~i}St`,tl I'.tSl'iY(Iti n1CI}till prof4;Cttili} Pf}Hang titrtller 4S}CiUi'S ts7af. reS2dc,ni, ~ ti54t~~'t', tiff}£s Et{?I t}iCttC 0721 tlic:s !<litds 1LI th<: i01}t~. tCrrSt 4§Ixii:lt 1s 3 p{)tt;n23i1! ttrkdCr t314 lirrt;nt /4ilt?1L.. ! ht ~{?tt xr+ 1~3d?1 L':3i;twt' {..~.(),ISi;.rt';2iftlPl ,'~.tl.!}C31'tt1 itl St! (?C{)t'tt.~4C~ FL'S'Ztis`rS (:Ctrrc'SI'3CttICj~...[2C:.t'. Tt'.(: C:it': Ci at the public c~seetisig an€I stzppt}rted the pr{xrxfst.ed recaz}ia~ ic> ~n Enva}'cnm~nta3 1'roieciic;n rc~nc. j. t, ° ~~~ as a}tat llatid attcl.~csr r}!zt°tx spttc+~ - -Area resid~~stts r xprc~sed at the }~trLic tncetin4~ t!}err tintilcrstar}ding that these fctzr lilf}cks eecre izt ! xzt yreetxspar~e c}r public lands. ,l"hose lands arc grit rrtcl~' cEtistxtd..eese z1c}Y dedi{ tateca tcs ttac I :~~erls7i€p as pac ~ c>t az,~ pcxrklazid blc3ck, and git~wti the is}Eetided vse ot`t!zese [ands to ctsttre~ s ~rtace dt'atc,<ztc. !>~.iblie ase t?I't3xese lands slxotzld ncct he t>c: tin-ing f{xr sa1'ett. p2xrpcises. `fhe itienttticatian elf these irlrads in an la}~ironnxcc}taI Prz}tectict} zoning evil: nicxre apprc~prdafety xdentiiy their 1171CfitletJ i.lS:lg+'~ i~or the ()t}i't~43riCC O{~sllPli2C#'t,~r8ti1.22,C 113x1. 3C i'JtCitlg. fz. ,:)fixer issues Spccsfic c<incerns rel:lied To ilxciieidtct}1 bltilflcn;.Y ±ixtittcr~; txn inclieicflial .s.sid~nti:xl 11}ts eeitlxin tlae existing dexelcxlxtneni er °rc; zzl€cs da~,cussed',tt this rsiFreting. 2'f}ese tnatfcrs lzre znfir~ appropriately addressed dcrectlt+ t}etueen the iz}n'itic3u<al Ianc3c}~tntc(,s}:,axc tiae deti~e]ti>per anti arc not ref€ited fo the proposed rcr3xztir}g ap pticats€~n. 1s netted in our f7rigintt( piaxxnir}~ anal}`sis, t'=}e ak>p 1€cttiicxn pre}p;;ses f;} a'ezone f'c7ur 1~icxcks .}' land {ti?ocks fa?-7C}} to a Site specific tinx~ircinine,~tai C'rotec€ion (7'F~ t zone is order ttz resicrict their intended usage €n €ccccirdancc :tiit}x the Sctl+dit•isioz} ilgreeznent adfxpfed b~• C`{}uncii. "1`(}e ctzrrecif roc}ing on the sit: is a Residential C)ne f;xc eptzon i ~lC) {I2l ra l ~lU> lone ce-hiclx zacct e?nl3 persaiits EEte currant usage brit exauld 31so penxzit a range cx`oti}er uses x~t}i<h, basec9 on the ({it at'ea rc gtaaretncnts, hae~e the potential to occccr on the site. The rezoning app3scr[ic?n is }ieopcrsng a nxor% restrictisc r<nxe in keeping tiaith tt}~ stitxdieis-ion agreen}ent <xtzd t}ae I'tn~nsh'sp (7i"iicitil t'lzxn pt}ltcies <:nti is it}tecxdecl act lira}it the. site t<i fhcs speciti{ uses. It is c>ttr uc.clertt=.nCiing 4htxt this reat>=tic}g applt~ atio7} .~-i1E he scheduJcci for I'tcrtixec° ccxns,dcrtitior, tat the 1'1at<ning rtde'isory' C:c7mmitic:e ^xeeting Ixeiae held cnx Jul}- fit}, 2t~f1i. 4i'c h:lievc: Hutt fhc axhc}s e <cdc3ressex all cxi the €nattt;rs raiscci sat the pot~tic aneetin4 1}eclc! e=artier this year, t~'e e~~?uid i}e Ix]case tcz spcezk kc} ttxese nxatiers fuct3xer at the 3uly s{} naet =ng. s],c7ttt~1 t[tis !?e ~sbzrrsxrxted. Slxoulci feet :~{lu:re ati~ a€lditional ini't}tniati«r in tl3;s ru~axrd. txlease dc; Hair aesifate tc7 t;{lSit2:Ct ths} txI'.d{'.r4t„~JICti. ~`Lxil?'S ~ rLlli, 'ti.clric 3,etg,li ~EC'II?. 3;.7'7' ''issociat=w A PP~tJDrx 'R' TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE REPORT Dept. Report No. To: Prepared By: BP 2007- 043 Planning Advisory Bruce Hoppe, MCIP, RPP Committee Subject: Department: Council Building & Planning Proposed Plan of Services C. of W. Subdivision and Rezoning, Date: James and Kimberley Drury, October 22, 2007 Motion # West Part of Lot 11, R.M. File #: 2006-SUB-02, Concession 5 (Oro), 2006-ZBA-04 Township of Oro-Medonte, d W t es 1099 Old Barrie Roa Date: Roll #: 010-002-26400 BACKGROUND: As directed at the July PAC meeting, the subject applications proceeded to a statutory public meeting as required under the Planning Act. This meeting was held on September 12, 2007. The purpose of this report is to assess comments made at the public meeting and make recommendations to Planning Advisory Committee as to the disposition of the matter. ANALYSIS: The proposed subdivision plan which was presented at the public meeting of September 12, 2007 is attached to this report as Appendix A. There were several members of the public who raised concerns at the public meeting. Two significant comments were made by several of the residents, as follows: The proposed access point in relation to traffic safety, intersection lighting and introduction of additional headlights from vehicular traffic; The shape and size of Lot 1 in relation to the existing lot fabric within the community. In order to address these concerns, staff reviewed these matters with the applicant, who has subsequently filed an amended plan, attached to this report as Appendix B. In relation to the access point, Street A has been relocated approximately 225 metres to the east of the previous proposal. This access point would intersect with Lauder Road which currently terminates at the Old Barrie Road (County Road No. 11) north of the subject property. While this alignment would fall slightly outside the existing settlement area limits of the Official Plan, this location would remove the nuisance factors for the existing residential properties in the vicinity of the original access location. Moreover, the alignment with the current subdivision on the north side of Old Barrie Road would make sense from a traffic safety standpoint. In respect of the settlement boundary limits, the Official Plan policy states as follows: "The boundaries between land uses designated on the Schedules to this Plan are approximate except where they meet with roads, railway lines, rivers, pipeline routes, transmission lines, lot lines or other clearly defined physical features and in these cases are not open to flexible interpretation. Where the general intent of the document is maintained, minor adjustments to boundaries will not require amendment to this Plan. " This revision has been circulated to the County of Simcoe who have no objections in principle. In addition to their standard daylighting and reserve requirements, the County .has indicated that a 60 metre right hand turn lane (taper) will be required at the eastbound approach to the new proposed road. This requirement has been reviewed with the proponent who is agreeable with this condition. Regarding the size/shape of Lot 1, planning staff recently conducted a site inspection with the applicant's agent and the Manager of Recreation. At that time, the merits of the Township pursuing additional lands to the south of the Edgar Community Hall were reviewed. Following the site visit, it has been determined that acquisition of lands in this vicinity would not be in keeping with the long term recreational plans for a centralized facility in nearby Guthrie to the south. In relation to the compatibility with existing development along OId Barrie Road and Line 4, the proponent has depicted a 15 metre side yard setback and resulting building envelope which would result. This increased setback can also ensure that existing drainage patterns to the rear of existing lots will remain unchanged. While staff have attempted to make better use of these lands which fall within the Settlement Area boundary, given the environmental constraints involved with crossing the creek to the east, staff are of the opinion that one large single lot is the preferred use of these (ands which will round out the settlement area of Edgar. It is noted that the revised plan also would see the limits of the proposed residentiaj development shifted slightly to the east, away from the environmental sensitive lands to the west, which would accommodate a large stormwater management block. Twelve lots in the original submission were proposed (which included a street pattern crossing the watercourse, which was amended to eleven Tots in the revised plan which was considered at the public meeting. Fifteen residential lots are now proposed. In response to some of the other comments, the proponent's planner has attached a summary letter for Committee's information as Appendix `C'. CONCLUSION: The proposed revisions would appear to address a significant amount of concerns emanating from the recent public meeting. Given that the nature of the proposal has changed fairly extensively from a site access standpoint, it is prudent to conduct a further public meeting to present this new information to the public, following which a report back to Planning Advisory Committee is proposed. RECOMMENDA On the basis of the above, it is recommended that Planning Advisory Committee recommend to Council: 1. THAT Report No. BP 2007-043 (Drury) be received and adopted; 2. THAT Plan of Subdivision application 2006-SUB-02 and Rezoning application 2006-ZBA-04 submitted by James and Kimberley Drury respecting lands described as West Part of Lot 11, Concession 5 (Oro), Township of Oro-Medonte proceed to a statutory Public Meeting in accordance with the provisions of the Planning Act. Respectfully submitted, r~~- - Bruce Hoppe, MPP Director of Building and Planning Services O ~ 8> i ~~ ~ 3Y ~ § ~ ~~$~ °w~gwns~n Oaz 9 Gy ~~ ~_ ~ s a g ~ S ~@~~~'g~a ~ ~ ~ ~ § ~ ~i: ~' A Z zzO NOZ W NWN WIZ U pUOO~ ~~ WU W zdz I-3 Q U$~ ( F 3 ~ S i d ~~ Ua IL w3w ~ Fgo oXSw= N~ ~''~ ~a F-na bd~~°--~ Q~N&b ~ ~...~ §_ ~ND_PYsY O°m zz°~~' ~ rm m' 4~~~ i J ~ ,ynJ° ~a.~a ~ " ~ ~ ~. p .W, ~ U N @@ ~ ^o ~ ~' ~~ ' ~ g' 5 E 3 i ~ s m+ ~ I £8'. N ~C x ~~~§Ae x~~~Ra~} } ~n~. o~' g _ - Q .^-pS ~-dd W U [ N Ks OL~> ( QW^ 33 ZNO Z Tg ~, ~ W W Z N e '§ Q F~ y~e tE 2:e a e s e n~ €la ~ ..} u e ~J~ 030 °~ ~~ 3 a 0 ~~?~ ~ m~$8 a ood~6d~ ~a:~o<. ° a Y a z a SI ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~'~ ~ ~ ~ aa ~ N m, ~ ~'',o_~..-• _ o Q~a~I~}! ~~(~ 3 . a i ££~ ~ k gd ~5$5 a< ~a _ ~> ~ ? ~§~~ d~ Y p z59~2 3 d 333 9 . e _ . 5 ° & . ° ° I ° A . p ' ~ ~ W ~ ~ ~ k 9 '~ W KF~ ~~ e+ ~nW Z r ~ ~ W3 3 Q 0 T J s ~ E O Opa W~tn l Q Q~~ LL ~ 0435 ~~.m-5~~~ ,s°° S ~ yeH Q Y y ~ e ~ z $ - ~ . ~ pe 3 g ~ v ~ 8 m¢ 7 ~ £8 - f//~~ UO~~ I I ~ A U~ ~ ~ ~ Kv~67w~~ m @y ~ ¢ ~ ~ g F kA ~e~~ ' LL . ~ GO \ WO/ ~Of- u 3~3 Kd W ~° Uc~ pZ ZUm ~ roc ~ W j 7 ~ }' S~_ O ~ $ g. ~°Li U 'p2 U C ~ K ~ O ~ QW k g ~ W W qq i 1- £;~ m~g, ~ ZQpp O 4LL `Z(~ ~J~ mow ~ 3 ~'~~ 3~~ e 3 k Y ~~~ ~¢~6 a " 3 Q OLL.N§§3(( ^O~¢BY ozU 997 g Y w e~ U ~ N p ~ g 3 ~ 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 2 ° w y I y c Fs§~~'t ~ FFa§42 ~~ ~~ ULLVJ 3FU' ~_ N _ 3 Q~Q eoa Y Q Y 1. October 3 8. ?Cip? ::;-t h :~;:, ,~~~t~ f~a .~.,.,,~,~ 11A~t:J <,.::gt. `... i3t ti. '.Ft.{T. kPP ~_ i;t s. Fz;,~.. _~, ;.~crz t~ i ~, ~a~ s, bz< <,. ~ ~~~ ~,-. . is; S~ t t ;• t~~~,- Bruce;iloppe,?FSCIP, )ti'P llirector oPBnilding & P1aunsng services Fcrwnshlp of C9ra-~fedonte P,O. Box ldp Oro Station. O~~ LPL a~:a Dear}vtr. Hoppe: IZe: C)run l'iaii of Su}~~h~'siun C,ozriesion Sv14^`est fart cif l.at 11, I O~~> t)Ic3 T3arrie Road 4~'esf, Totisnship of l~r~-~ie~lonte fprrnerivC3ra Further to the Puht}c ?v~3eeiing held on September } 2, 26Q"r please find below our response to the matters raised at that meeting. I. Ih~~etling Unit Restrictions - As staff are aware, the Planning Act does oat provide the ability to dictate house design or materia3s; we have however reviewed the proposed draft plan and zoning regulations and it is our opinion that dwel}logs in the range o' I $4(7 square feet can be accommodated on each of the proposed tots. A indicated at the public meeting; our client is not a developer and therefore eaonat commit to the specific design of dwellings. 'Fhe lot sizes proposed permit flexibi}it}' in the design of the dwellings to a€lorv them to be consistent: with and complinaentan of the. surrounding neighbourhood. ?. Parkland L7edication - A site visit was conducted with `Township staff to rovicu° the lands immediately= south of the F,dgar {~ommunity HaII to determine if a (acrd dedication from the proposed develapmant was required for future expansion of the halh StatT have determined that additional lands era not required. $}ock 18 as shown on the revised plan contains mature trees and the creek area immediately east of the Edgar Community Hal}, the disposition o'f these lands continues to require direetii}n from the Township far Their dedication to the Township or The Nottawasaga Va17ey Gonseruation Authority, 3, Proposed Street lntersectionlStreet Lighting -The proposed street has been re}ocated in order to be aligned with the currant intersection of Z,auder Rosd and Old E3artie Road {C:ounty Road 11}. The re}ocaEioar of this road has resu3ted in the srtreet iightutg and traffic connection being centralized and away from existing tridents along the O}d E3arrie Roac being located further from the residents, Phis has a}so allowed for the residential lots to he located along dre Old Barrrt Road wit}r access franc the internal street. 4. Traffie%SafetyiEmergency Access - As discussed above; the proposed road has been re}ocated to align u~th the intersection of Lauder Road and Qld Barrie Road fhereb}~ providing for a sing}e intersection east o}`Line ~l Norih, The revised plan has been reviexed bu the County of Simcoe and they have confirmed their support for the proposed re-aligmnent. Act emergent>~ access b}~ck has also been accommodated (t3lock }?} to provide an akenrate access to the O}d Barrie Roae( should Sueh lie required. p~P~~xx `~ rs ~~„s;ra <<~, 3Sar c. « dal ~=1 ill +4ti 5. Zoning - 3'Ite iezaning application proposes to recane the draft plan to a Residential C)ne (R 1 } z~tnc consistent with the stFrraunding residential uses. rill of the proposed lots more th;ut saYist_4 the mit~irnum requirements of this zone, 6. t c>Y 1 - This tot encompasses .til of the lands within the Rural Settlement Area desi4~~nation located hest of the creek. Given the limits of the designation only a drives+ai~ access can be aceornm~?dated 1'ar thes4 lands. t~ building envelope and increased interior side card setback hate also been identified far the lot with consideration y~i~~en to compatibility ra~itla ehc neig3tbouring dwellings ?. Subdletaion Agreemenll5ite Plan ~- .M appiicatian for a plan of snbdivision was submitted to the I~+3~'itship. fine ctf the draft plan conditions anticipated t?om the fiowcrship will be the regaur~neut to enter itato a subdivision agreement with the Townshi} laeiv~3re registration of the plan. Tlac subdivision agreeiuent requires the cainpletio~a of engine~rine drawings inchzdine lot grading lslans for eaah of the proposed lass. These drawings will identify the building septic, and dris~eway location fur each af~ the lots. It is iherrfore our opinion that all matters can be adequately addressed through the plan ci subdivision process and the Subdivision A~eeme~rt with the Township and d{yes not require duplication thtaugh the Site flan Coattrol process. As a result of the written and verbal eammencs received at the Public ;t9eeTing, the proposed drag plan has been amended. The following provide a brief sumrnary of the revisions: I . Ideutiticatian of a drivewaylbuilding en~~elope location and a aorthlwest zone boundary setback liar E_=.7t ;; ... Relocation oh proposed "Street A" to align wit}t the existing intersection of Lauder Road and Old 13su rte Raad {County Road i 1); 3, Increase in the minimum lot areas proposed; and 4. Increase in #hc total yield of lots from i4 to lS. Itt accordance with the Planning Act requirements, the Township has the ehility to proceed foe ward with the revised plan without the requirement for an additional pub3ic meeting. The revisions to the draft {an {atinched) have been made to specifically address the verbal and i~~ritten comme~rts received tln-oagh the public meeting process; his our opinion that these rea=isiuns are considered miner in nature and iherefi~re that an additional public meeting is aot regeired. Tltis tpphuati0n ivas originally subuutted in January 24[15 and has been ongoing through numezous rca~~isions and comments through the vas ions agencies since that time. phis revised plan (atu~tehe d? has been cireulatacl to the Gountp~ of Simcoe, the authority responsible for the Old L3a=rie he ad, tvho have confirmed their suppot2 for the location of Street A subject io tandard technical conditions. 1¢ is tour understanding that this is the infa~~nation you require to proceed beet: far further discussion at rite plannistg Adviso~3~ Committee ort October 22, 240?. Should you require anything further, please da aot hesitate, to contact me. ~rC?lii'S ~!'nlY", ?YtH13C Planning 1 Aitdria Leigh, I~+1C ', Itl'F' ,i~SSQClate eC. J, llrun°