10 18 2007 C of A Agenda..........
........ ........ ,
fll��
930 2007® - James Gray
W. Pt. of Lot 5, Con. 5
2815 Line 4 North
(Former Township of Oro)
9:45 2007-B-29 Roger & Patricia Weisman
Lot 1, Conc. 1
3348 Ridge Road W.
(Former Township of Oro)
10:00 2007-A-27 Blanche & Gary Johnston
Plan 798, Lots 7 & 8
13 O'Connell Lane
(Former Township of Oro)
10:15 2007-A-28 Jason & Crystal Cooke
Plan M3679 Blocks 82 & 83
3358 Line 6 North
(Former Township of Oro)
10-30 2007-A-29 Jo-Ellen Robinson
Lot 12, Conc. 2
144 Line 2 North
(Former Township of Oro)
i. Adoption of Minutes from September 20, 2007 meeting
5. Adjournment
_IHN
Planning Report for
October 18, 2007
*fficial Plan Designation — Ruram?
Zoning By-law 97-95 — Agricultural/Rural (A/Rq Zone
NEneral Aggregate Resource Two (MAR2) Zone
Previous Applications —
AGENCY COMMENTS
County of Simcoe — No Concerns
Public Works Department -
Building Department -
En ' eering Department -
The subject property, 2815 Line 4 North, contains a frontage along Line 4 North of 640
metres, frontage along Bass Lake Sideroad of 800 metres, and a lot area of 57.79 hectares.
The lot to be enhanced, 1058 Bass Lake Sideroad, has an irregular shape, with frontage of 60
metres, a depth of 57 metres, and a lot area of 0.34 hectares.
OFFICIAL
Section D2.2.2 of the Official Plan provides a specific policy to allow Committee to consider
applications for o a
A consent may be permitted for the purpose o, f moding lot boundaries, pro�nded no neW
building lot is created... in addition, the Committee of A,#ustment shall be satisfied that
the boundar l adjustment will not affect the viability of the agricultural parcels affected
In reviewing the application, no new building lots will be created, and given the relatively
small amount of land to be conveyed, the viability of the overall agricultural operation would
not likely experience an adverse impact; the site ' inspection revealed that the lands proposed
to be conveyed 'in fact contained scrub vegetation. On this basis, the application is
considered to be appropriate and generally conforms to the Official flan.
ZONING BY-LAW
CONCLUSION
The proposed consent application for a lot addition, once rezoned to reflect the intended
land use, will generally conform to the policies of the Official Plan and comply with the
provisions of the Zoning By -law.
It is recornmended that the Committee grant Provisional Consent to Application 2007 -P -30,
where a block of land having an area of 0.04 hectares shall be conveyed frorn 2815 Line 4
North to 1058 Bass Lake Sideroad, subject to the following conditions:
1. That three copies of a Deference Plan for the subject land indicating the severed
parcel be prepared by an Ontario Land Sun -eyor be submitted to the Secretary -
Treasurer;
2. That the applicant's solicitor prepare and submit a copy of the proposed conveyance
for the parcel severed, for review by the Municipality;
3. That the severed lands be merged in title with 1058 Bass Lake Sideroad, and that the
provisions of Subsection 3 or 5 of Section 50 of The Planning Act apply to any
subsequent conveyance or transaction mivolving the subject lands;
4. That the applicants solicitor provide an undertaking that the severed lands and the
lands to be enhanced will merge in title;
5. That the applicant apply for and obtain a rezoning on the subject lands, where the
parcel to be conveyed from 2815 Line 4 North to 1058 Bass Lake Sideroad be
rezoned from the (NIA R2) Zone to the (1) Zone to accurately reflect the 'intended
land use;
6, That the conditions of consent imposed by the Committee be fulfilled within one
year from the date of the giving of the notice.
All of which is respectfully submi'tted, Reviewed by
Kozlowski, B.URPL Glenn White MCIP, RPP
:r Senior Planner
Lands to be conveyed
from 2515 Line A. N to
1058 Bass Lake Sideroad
10581 Bass Lake SR
13
u
Committee of Adjustment Meeting Date
Subject Property
4. Future Road widening Required Yes No
5. Will Road Surface be adversely affected Yes
6, Future Drive to be located
2 -
J--Irr-i Ball, Public Woflks Superintendent
----------
Planning Report for
October 18, 2007
the lot addition.
OFFICIAL PLAN
Section 02.2-2 of the Official Plan provides a specific policy to allow Committee to consider
applications for boundary adjustments in all land use designations. The policy states:
'A consent may be permittedfor the purpose of mod 9 g lot boundaries, provided no ne2v
building lot is created... in addition, the Committee of Adjustment shall be satisfied that
the boundary adjustment will not affect Me m'abilio of the a
,griculturalparcels affected.
In reviewmig the application, no new building lots will be created, and given that the subject
iy,.ast cultivattion a -T the vinhilim of existin or
potential agricultural operations will not be compronnsed by this application. On this basis,
the application is considered to be appropriate and generally conforms to the Official Plan.
The proposed consent application for a boundary adjustment would appear to conform to
the policies of the Official Plan, and complies with the lot area and use provisions of the
Zoning By-law.
it is recoT1T11C 14-CM MaL L11C X=111' r IU V 1")Igw I.Lal
where a strip of land having an area of 0.069 hectares shall be conveyed from 3348 Ridge
Road West to 3266 Ridge Road West, subject to the following conditions:
the Comrmttee be fulfilled within one
Reviewed by
Glenn White, MCIP RPP
Senior Planner
Retained Parcel
3348 Ridge Road W
J �T
IZ
y4 y <!: l =l
I
Lands to be
conveyed from
3348 to 3266
5. Will Road Surface be adversely affected Yes No
f
Jerry Ball, Public Works Superintendent
Lot #: Plan #:
M
Conc. #:
.0 The Township Building Dept. has reviewed this application.
pill
A Proposal appears to meet minimum standards.
El Applicant to verify that sewage system meets minimum required setbacks
as per Part 8 of the Ontario Building Code.
El Comments:
Note: This is not approval for any particular development proposal
Respectfully submitted,
Michael Diver, CBCO
Chief Building Official
V IM9113tir
Planning Report for
October 18, 2007
Blanche & Gary Johnston
2007-A-27
13 O'Connell Lane, Plan 798, Lots 7 & 8 (Forrner Oro)
The applicants are proposing to construct a detached garage with a ground floor area of 61.3
tn'. The applicants are requesting the following relief from Section 5.1.3 a) and d) of Zoning
By-law 97-95:
Residential Limited Service (RLS)*H Zone Required Propose
Front yard setback 7.5 in 6.73 m
Interior Side Yard Setback 2 m 1 m
1 1 1111,11, ''I'll 1111 1",
IS
Public Works Department -
Building Department —
Engineering Department —
Do the variances conform to the general intent of the OfFIckd PIRn?
Are the variances appropriate for the desirable development ref f the lot?
N
On the basis that the proposal would not adversely affect access on O'Connell Lane, and
will not have a negative impact on privacy for surrounding properties, the proposed
variances are considered to be minor.
CONCLUSION
The application to reduce the required interior side yard and front yard setback, to permit
construct a detached garage generally satisfies the tests of a variance.
It is reco ended that the Co ttee approve Minor Variance 2007 -a -26, being to grant a
reduction for the interior side yard setback from 2 metres to 1 metre, and to reduce the front
yard setback from 7.5 metres to 6.73 metres for the construction of a detached accessory
building having a floor area of 61.3 square metres, subject to the following conditions:
Ontario 1. That an Land Surveyor provide • s the Township of
pining with the Committee's decision by 1) the footing
prior to pouring of the foundation t
a) the detached garage be located no closer than 6.73 metres from the front lot
line
b) the detached garage be no closer than 1 metre to the east interior side lot line
2. That the applicant enter into a Site Plan Agreement with the Township, 'including
removal of the Molding Provision;
3. That the applicant receive any necessary permits and /or approvals from the Lake
Simcoe Region Conservation authority, if required;
4. That the appropriate building permit be obtained from the Township's Chief Building
Official only after the Committee's decision becomes final and binding, as provided
for within the Planning act R.S.O. 1990, c.P. 13.
in
Hearing Date:
Application #:
Owner:
MAS #: A \�Z_ C_L_
rl
I. ®t #: f 72 Plan 12�� Conc.
148 Line 7 S., Box 100
Oro, Ontario LOL 2X0
Phone (705)487-Z171
Fax (705) 487-0133
www.oro-medonte-ca
0 Comments:
Note: This is not approval for any particular development proposal
Respectfully submitted,
Michael Diver, CCO
hief Building Official
J,
LAXf SiMtoE N ,
7
Planning Report for
October 0 0 ..
Jason Crystal Coke
2007-A-28
3338 Line 6 North, Plan M367, Blocks 82 & 83 (Fo er Oro)
THE PROPOSAL
The subject property contains an existing single detached dwelling and 23.7 square metre deck
at the rear of the dwelling, where the deck does not comply with the required rear yard setback
for the residential One (R1) Zone. The applicant is requesting a Minor variance to reduce the
required rear yard setback from 7.5 metres to 6 metres for the deck,
1110111 KIM 111 1 1
Official Plan Designation Residential
Previous Applications — None.
AGENCY COMMENTS
Public Works Department — No Concerns
Building Department —
Engineering Department — No concerns
The subject property is located in the Sugarbush settlement approximately 4/2 kilometer
south of Horseshoe Valley road, and has a lot frontage of approximately 30 metres on Line
6 Forth, a lot depth of approximately 57 metres and a lot area of approximately 0.16
hectares. The property currently contains a two storey residential dwelling and detached
accessory building.
Does the variance conform to the general intent of the fFIcial Plan?
my ,.
On the basis that the existing deck is a permitted use and will not have a negative impact on
the subject lands or surrounding residential neighbourhood, the proposed variance is
considered to be minor.
CONCLUSION
The application generally satisfies the tests of variance.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that Committee approve Variance Application 2007 -A -28, where the rear
yard setback of the subject lands shall be reduced from 7.5 metres to 6 metres to
accommodate an existing 23.7 square metre deck, subject to the following conditions:
1. That Committee recognize the existing deck, and that said deck shall be setback no
closer than 6 metres from the rear lot line;
I That the setbacks be in conformity with the dimensions as set out in the application
and on the sketches submitted with the application and approved by the Committee;
appropriate That the in i be
Building Official only after the Committee's
provided for within the Planning Act R.S.O.
All of which is respectfully submitted,
obtained from the Township's Chief
decision becomes final and binding, as
Reviewed by,
m
*Ucl- 4/rc
/dam Kozlowski, P,LTRPL Bruce Hoppe, MCIP RPP
Planner Director of wilding & Planni g Services
n
��
"pr
from
El Comments:
Note: This is not approval for any particular development proposal
Respectfully submitted,
mm
w 7-- F - F . 77� V
Planning Report for
October 18, 2007
, I-,
Does the variance conform to the general intent of the Official Plan?
I he variance for the enclosed entrance would appear to maintain the character of the
agricultural area, renovations such as the enclosed entrance are permitted in agricultural
designation. Therefore the variance would appear to conform to the general intent of the
Official Plan.
�1511111
The purpose of the front yard setback is to establish a reasonable setback for character,
parking, safety and road maintenance. However, due to the location of the dwelling on
the lot a variance is needed for any improvements to the front of the dwelling.
It is staff's opinion that given the relatively minor addition proposed, the intent of the By-
�aw will not • compromised.
,J!rAP
The proposed enclosed entrance would appear to be appropriate for the desirable
development of the lot, and would be in keeping with the general characteristics of the
surrounding residential area. Further, the proposed dwelling constitutes a form of
development that is permitted within the Rural Residential Two Zone, and is compatible
with the surrounding neighbourhood.
Due to the proposed size of the enclosed entrance being 7.4 M2 (80 ft), it is considered
to be minor in nature. The proposed variance would appear to have no impact on traffic
and Township maintenance operations on Line 2 N.
Based on the above the proposed variance is considered to be minor.
The application to permit an addition to an existing dwelling on the subject property
generally satisfies the four tests of a minor variance.
RECOMMENDATIONS
It is recommended that the Committee grant Minor Variance 2007-A-29, being a minor
variance to reduce the front yard setback from 8 metres to 3.84 metres for an enclose
entrance subject to the following conditions:
The proposed "enclosed entrance" at the front of the proposed dwelling shall be
setback no closer than 3.84 metres from the front property line, and that a
Ontario Land Surveyor provide verification to the Township of compliance with
Committee's decision-,
N
2. That the setbacks be in conformity with the dimensions as set out in the applicati
and sketches submitted and approved by the Committee. I
3. That the appropriate building permit be obtained from the Township's Chief
Building Official only after the Committee's decision becomes final and binding,
as provided for within the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P. 13.
All of which is respectfully submitted,
Steven Farquharson, B.URPL
Junior Planner
IN
MMM��
Bruce Hoppe, MCIP, RPP
Director of Planning
�MPANY: -
SCRIPTION
. . ... .... .
Consent
Min ®r Variance,
Other
Address
Subject Property ___--J—(2-°
Date of Inspectio 7
Name of Road _ZzL.-,— �1�
Surface of Road_ZZ,4e
1, Site Lines, Township Road Poor—
Good
Excellent_
2, Site Lines, Subject Property Poor
Good
Excellent
Drive
3. Drainage Poor
Good
Excellent
4. Future Road Widening Required
Yes
No
If yes, Amount
5. Will Road Surface be adversely affected Yes
A Piibirp it vp. ton he located A �t1
jerry Ball, Public Works Superintendent
Lot #: Plan #:
Conc. #:
12r The Township Building Dept. has reviewed this applicatio-'"
Is
-,0 Proposal appears to meet minimum standardl,
El Applicant to verify that sewage system meets minimum required setbacks
as per Part 8 of the Ontario Building Code.
El Comments:
Note- This is not approval for any particular development proposal
Respectfully submitted,
Michael Diver, CBCO
,(,>_ Chief Building Official
MO'rIION# /0
Correspondence to be addressed at the time of the specific hearing.
Committee of Adjustment-September 20, 2007
Page 1
9:30 2007-13-28 Gordon Arnaut
Lot 12, Con. 14
2508 Townline
(Former Township of Medonte)
Secretary-Treasurer Adam Kozlowski read correspondence received fro
Tim Salkeld, Resource Planner, Nottawasaga Valley Conservat!
Authority, dated September 18, 2007, (no objection to application), verbati
to Committee and the audience. I
"Committee grant Provisional Consent to Application 2007-B-28 to convey a strip
of land having a frontage of 7.6 metres (25 feet) on Townline a depth of 328
metres (1078 feet) and an area of 0.25 hectares (0,61 acres) to the land
adjacent to the south (also owned by the applicant) and subject to the following
conditions:
1. That three copies of a Reference Plan for the subject land indicating the
severed parcel be prepared by an Ontario Land Surveyor be submitted to
the Secretary-Treasurer;
2. That the applicant's solicitor prepare and submit a copy of the proposed
conveyance for the parcel severed, for review by the Municipality;
3. That the applicant provide verification to the Township 1
Buildi
51*
Department that the septic system on the subject lands meet with Part
of the Ontario Building Code;
4. That the conditions of consent imposed by the Committee be fulfilled
within one year from the date of the giving of the notice.
Committee of Adjustment-September M 2007
Page 2
9:45 2007-113-27 George Gaudet
Con.10, West Pt Lot 25
(Former Township of Oro)
ltvw� � U - - a= �
I
BE IT RESOLVED that:
Moved by Michelle Lynch, seconded by Garry Potter
"Committee grant provisional consent to Application 2007-B-27 for the creation
of a new residential lot, having an area of 0.2 hectares and frontage on
Lakeshore Road East of 56 metres, subject to the following conditions:
Committee of Adjustment-September 20, 2007
Page 3
10:00 2007-A-26 Walter Stevens & Karen Jensen
Plan 780, Lot 51
103 Eight Mile Point Road
(Former Township of Oro)
arm=
BE IT RESOLVED that:
"Committee approve Minor Variance 2007-A-26 which grants an interior side
yard setback of 1.2 metres rather than the required 2.0 metres an a front yard
setback of 2.0 metres rather then the required 7.5 metres and further be subject
to the following conditions:
1. That an Ontario Land Surveyor provide verification to the Township of
compliance with the Committee's decision by 1) pinning the footing and 2)
verifying in writing prior to pouring of the foundation by way of survey/real
property report so that:
Z That the appropriate building permit be obtained from the Township's Chief
Building Official only after the Committee's decision becomes final and
binding, as provided for within the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P. 13.
Committee of Adjustment-September 20, 2()07
Page 4
Secretary-Treasurer Adam Kozlowski
Salkeld, Resource Planner, Nottawasag
dated September 18, 2007, (no objectio
Ernie Doolittle, dated September 4, 2C
verbatim to Committee and the audience.
"10
lead correspondence from Tim
4 Valley Conservation Authority,
n to application) and; letter from
objection to application)
"Committee Approve Variance application 2007-A-25, being a minor variance to
construct a second storey addition on an existing dwelling and attached garage,
with existing deficient setbacks being 1.7 metres from the east lot line, and 14.3
metres from the shoreline of Bass Lake, subject to the following conditions:
That the proposed second storey addition be constructed as depicted on
the site plan prepared by Jack Steenhof, being Drawing A-1.0. dated
August 3, 2007;
2. That the appropriate building permit be obtained from the Townshi
Chief Building Official only after the Committee's decision becomes fin],
and binding, as provided for within the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c-P, 1
Committee of Adustment-September 20, 2007
Page 5
4. Other Business -S
Adoption of Minutes from August 16, 2007 Committee of Adjustment
Hearing
Moved by Michelle Lynch, seconded by Rick Webster
"That the minutes for the August 165 2007 Committee of Adjustment Meeting e
adopted as printed and circulated
Moved by Bruce Chappell, seconded by Michelle Lynch
"We do now adjourn at 11 :00a Carried."
(NOTE: A digital recording of this meeting is available for review.)
Chairperson Secretary-Treasurer
Lynda Aiken Adam Kozlowski
Committee of AdjUSIment-September 20, 2007
Page 6