08 15 2000 PAC Agenda0 TOWNSHIP OF ORO- MEDONTE
PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE
AGENDA
TUESDAY AUGUST 15, 2000
1. Call to order by Chairman.
2. Declaration of Pecuniary Interest and the General
Nature Thereof - in Accordance with the Act.
3. Adoption of the Minutes of June 20, 2000.
4. Correspondence and Communication
None
5. Deputations
• 7:00 p.m. Oro- Medonte Golf Ltd.
Concession 2, Pt Lot 10 and D (Oro)
Mr. Ray Valaitis from the Ministry of Agriculture and Food
will be attending to discuss his position regarding his letter of
June 10, 2000 and to answer the Committee questions
7:30 p.m. Susan Woods P- 107/00
Range 2, Part of Lot 2 (Oro)
Proposed Zoning By -law Amendment
8:00 p.m. Trinity Community Church P- 104/00
Concession 7, Part of Lot 21 (Oro)
Proposed Official Plan Amendment
8:30 p.m. Eric Bowes and Dawn Braden P- 105/00
Concession 4, South Part of Lot 8 (Oro)
Proposed Zoning By -law Amendment
6. Other Business
• 7. Adjournment
• TOWNSHIP OF ORO- MEDONTE
PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE
MINUTES
JUNE 20, 2000
PRESENT: Sue Grant, Peter Wigham, Paul Marshall, Councillor Ruth
Fountain, Deputy Mayor Don Bell, and Mayor Ian Beard
ABSENT: Garry Fell
STAFF PRESENT: Andria Leigh
1. Chairman Peter Wigham called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
2. "DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST AND THE GENERAL
NATURE THEREOF - IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ACT."
None Declared.
3. Minutes
• Moved by Deputy Mayor Don Bell, seconded by Paul Marshall
That the minutes of the meeting of the Township of Oro - Medonte
Planning Advisory Committee held on May 31, 2000 be adopted as
printed and circulated.
Carried.
4. Correspondence and Communication
None Received.
5. Deputations
7:30 p.m. Peter and Margaret Kells P- 103/00
Concession 10, East Part of Lot 9 ( Medonte)
Proposed Zoning By -law Amendment
In Attendance: No One
• Ms. Leigh reviewed the application with the Committee and explained the
concerns raised by the Chief Building Official and the Fire Chief. She explained
Ll
8:30 p.m. Robert Spears P -98/99
Concession 13, Part of Lot 2 (Oro)
Proposed Official Plan Amendment &
Zoning By -law Amendment
In Attendance: Robert Spears, Applicant, and Ron Mills, Applicant's Consultant
Ms. Leigh updated that status of this application with the Committee and
explained the issues that had arisen at the Public meeting. She explained that
the majority of these issues were technical in nature and were being addressed
through the Site Plan application, which had been submitted and was currently
being reviewed by the Township's Engineering Consultant.
Mr. Mills reviewed the proposed site plan with the Committee and reviewed his
correspondence, which indicated how they were addressing the comments
raised at the public meeting.
Moved by Deputy Mayor Don Bell, seconded by Susan Grant
"It is recommended that Development Application P- 97/99, a proposed
• Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By -law Amendment, be presented to
Council for favorable consideration of the Official Plan Amendment and
that the Zoning By -law Amendment proceed subject to the final approval of
the Official Plan Amendment."
...Carried.
9:00 p.m. Oro- Medonte Golf Ltd. P -83/99
Status Update by Applicant's Consultant
In Attendance: Don Hanninen and Bruce Dodson, Applicants, and Ron Mills,
Applicant's Consultant
Ms. Leigh provided an update on this application including the letters received
from the Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority and the Ministry of
Agriculture, Food, and Rural Affairs ( OMAFRA). She explained that at this time
the County had not provided any further letter as they were requesting
clarification from OMAFRA regarding the designation letter that had been sent.
• Ms. Leigh explained that a site visit had taken place with a planner from
OMAFRA at which the Township was not represented and therefore the
• Township was requesting further information regarding the OMAFRA letter which
suggested that the entire south west corner of the Municipality should be re-
designated to Rural. Ms. Leigh explained that both she and the County required
additional information regarding the criteria utilized by OMAFRA to determine
this land area. Discussion also occurred regarding the outstanding concern with
transportation issues and a meeting was to be established between the technical
parties with a report back to the Committee at a future meeting.
Moved by Mayor Ian Beard, seconded by Susan Grant
"It is recommended that further clarification be received from the County
Planning Department on Development Application P- 83199, a proposed
Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By -law Amendment. Additional
information is required with respect to County Official Plan conformity with
the Agricultural versus Rural designation in the local Official Plan and also
regarding the criteria utilized in the assessment by the Ministry of
Agriculture, Food, and Rural Affairs in their letter of June 10, 2000 and that
this be provided to the Planning Advisory Committee for future review."
...Carried.
• 6. Other Business
Discussion occurred with the members of the Committee regarding their
mandate and the process, which is currently utilized for the processing of
Planning applications. It was explained that the Planner would review this
with a report to Council and that the mandate for the Committee would
likely be updated for a new Committee in the new year. It was indicated
that for applications this year that subsequent to Public Meetings there
would be presented to the Committee for a final recommendation to
Council.
7. Adjournment
Moved by Deputy Mayor Don Bell
That this meeting now adjourn at 9:45 p.m.
• Peter Wigham, Chairman
Andria Leigh, Planner
Carried.
HORSESHOE VALLEY PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION
tt Box 51 PR #1 Barrie, Ontario JAM AY8
s:
•Township of Oro - Medonte
Ms Vicki Robertson, Clerk
Box 100
Oro Ontario LOL 2X0
July 9, 2000
� U
Subject: Horseshoe Valley Application for Zoning Change
Concerning an Adult Life Style Community
Dear Ms Robertson
On April 5`" of this year at a regular council meeting of The Township Oro - Medonte,
Horseshoe Resort made what was to be the first of two presentations, for application to
change existing zoning, and to develop a 600 unit Adult Life Style Community. This
meeting was well attended by members of this Association of which I am President, and we
voiced our concerns with regards to this development and the effect it would have on road
safety, water usage and sewage disposal. (See attached).
At the end of this April meeting attendees were advised that to receive notification of the
second meeting we should leave our name and address with the clerk. On behalf of the
• Association I left my name and address as well as the Association's address.
On June 10,2000 we invited Deputy Mayor Don Bell to attend a special meeting of our
mem ers ip o
regarding this application and heard some promises by Horseshoe Resort's owners.
The lack of our attendance at the July 4" Council meeting was not because we had no
concerns, nor was it because we agreed with the proposed increase in the number of
units, it was simply because we did not receive the promised notification. No notification
has been received to this date.
Because of the lack of proper notification and before council makes any decision on this
development, we request that another meeting be reconvened and that we be given
adequate notification, by mail, so that we may prepare our presentation.
I have spoken to the Mayor regarding the above issue.
Carlton B. Waddling, President
•51 Fairway Court, RR #1 Shanty Bay ON
LOL 21-0
copy attached
cc Mayor Beard, Councillor
McConnell
Co 15�l
Township of Oro - Medonte
Mr. Ian Beard, Mayor
Box 100
Oro Ontario LOL 2X0
I 13 14
r_
f
June 23, 2000
Subject: Horseshoe Valley Application for Development of A Life Style Community
Dear Mr. Mayor
On Saturday June 10, 2000 we held a Special Meeting of the members of Horseshoe Valley
Property Owners' Association. The purpose of this meeting was to hear Horseshoe Resort's
presentation of their proposed Adult Life Style Development, and to obtain direction from our
membership in this regard. The meeting was attended by some 100 members, and your
Township was represented by Deputy Mayor Don Bell.
Mr Kimble of Horseshoe Valley presented the Horseshoe plan to our membership and
answered questions from the audience regarding road safety and the higher density that
would result from this development.
Mr Boville, one of the shareholders of Horseshoe Resorts Inc. addressed the group. He
advised us of the developer's intention to development 18 estate style homes on the ridge. •
running west along Highland Drive between Valley Crest Dr and the water tower road. This
would require a change-to-the- Official -Plan, moving -the use of the land from medium density
residential to low
This statement was seen by the membership as a form of compromise, addressing our overall
concern regarding the increased density in the Highlands, but it fell short of addressing the
issue of road safety. An issue that is relevant today regardless of any additional development
in the Horseshoe Valley area. The County of Simcoe, the Township of Oro - Medonte and
Horseshoe Resort each share a responsibility to address the dangers that are present on
County Road 22 at the entrance to Horseshoe Resort and the turn at the 4"' line.
During the past six years the community surrounding the Resort has seen tremendous growth.
Sugar Bush, Oro Hills and the Highlands have all doubled in size. During the same time frame
enough deaths and serious injuries have already occurred in these areas to demand
immediate changes to this stretch of road, regardless of any further development in this
community, and as yet nothing has been done.
Horseshoe Resort has scheduled the building of golf cart tunnels under County Road 22, for
completion in the summer of 2000. It would seem logical that the County, Township and
Horseshoe could co- ordinate construction efforts, and complete the east and west bound
turning lanes at the Resort driveway at the same time. The developer has contributed their
funds by way of the lot levies, it is now time that the two levels of government recognize the •
immediacy of the need and make funds available now to provide safe turning lanes in this
area
The full Board of Horseshoe Valley Property Owners' Association met in the evening of
Monday June 12, 2000 to consider our position. We have adopted the wishes of our
membership as follows.
The Horseshoe Valley Property Owners' will not object to the proposed Adult Life Style
Development, with the understanding that:
1. Horseshoe Resort will apply for a revision to the Official Plan to change the
zoning of the ridge area, running west along Highland Drive between Valley
Crest Drive and the Water Tower road, from medium density residential to low
density residential,
2, Horseshoe Resort will incorporate a southern exit from its proposed plan to the
31d line. (This is now shown on the revised plans)
3, That Horseshoe and the township will agree to terminate Nordic Trail so that it
does not empty onto Highland Drive, (as is now shown on the revised plans)
We further strongly recommend in the name of safety, that the County, Township and
Horseshoe co ordinate their efforts to:
�. Complete the east and west bound turning lanes on County Road 22 at the
entrance to Horseshoe Resort in conjunction with the building of the golf and
equipment tunnels in this location, recognizing the immediate need to address
the_J_ona outstanding safety issue at this location.
2. Move up the construction of east and west bound turning lanes at the 4"' line and
County Road 22 to the first phase of development of the Adult Life Style
Community. .
We recognize that some of these requirements will take cooperation between the various
levels of government, but it is important that the safety of the our residents and guest of
Horseshoe Resort be taken seriously. Horseshoe Resort has recognized this with their
agreement to build the tunnels, it is time for governments to come to the table and get the job
done.
Yours on behalf of the Board
Carlton Waddling, President
cc Martin Kimble, Development, Horseshoe Resort �~
-Vi3A.f'��'4ry"n
• Garfield Dunlop, Ontario Member of Legislature 'I
Jennifer Zieleniewski, Chief Administrative Officer, Township of Oro - ;.
Helen MacRae, Chief Administrative Officer, County of Simcoe ea co t� ��
06/15/00 15:08 E 1 705 734 3585
rL.nnninurrvKtZiIKT rv> 727 4276 06/15
r
Ministry of
Agrlouiturs, Food
and Rural Affairs
R.R, N3, 85 Dundas St.,
Brighton, Ontario KOK 1HO
To[; (613)475 -1764
Fox! (613) 470.3035
MinistOre tie
I'Agriculturs, do I'Aiimentstion
at des AMrines rurales
R.R. its, 05 roe Outda4
Brphton, Ontario KOK 1H0
T6i.' (613) 475.4764
T6I6o.: (618) 474.3635
Agriculture & Rural Div►sion
June 10, 2000
Ross Cotton Post -lr Fax
Planner T°
The County of Simcoe co rcnol'`.
11) 0 Highway 26, Administration Centre "hone 0
Midlmurst, Ontario �+
LOL I XO
Dear Ross:
Subject: Agricultural Designations for Oro ;Mcdontc
Simcoe County
MILLSPLGN P•02
'00 15:11 NO.944 11/0
& 0�I no
r
lli'rJ t ,Vic i
!1
7871
Staff of this Ministry provide the following technical comments in view of the Provincial P,
Statement (1997), specifically Section 2.1 - Agricultural Policies.
A dovolopment proposal has been proposed for part of lots 9 & 10, concession 2, (Forinefly
Township). A golf course is proposed to be built upon the subject lands. ,
On May 17, 2000 a site visit of the subject area took place. The purpose of the site
determine if 0).e proposed development lies within a prime agricultural area where
lands should be designated for Agricultural purposes as per the PPS.
The area reviewed is identified on the attached map. The subject lands do not He vlithin
provincially significant Agricultural area as per the ppS.
Minimum Distance Separation 1 formula provides a minimum distance for new development
golf courses from existing livestock facilities. Consequently any tee -off area is to be located
closer than the calculated distance of separation.
Ontario, there's no taste Ilko home
Un bon Coot 00 chez sous
06/15/00
.$C PLANNING /FORESTRY
15:08 S 1 705 734 3585 MILLSPLRN P.03
705 727 4276 06/15 100 15:12 NO. 944 ;0� /03 J
-2-
While the above represents the Ministry's interpretation of provincial policy with r4gard to
agricultural Iand, it does not reflect an overall provincial position. There may be planning don
or interests of other agencies that should be regarded, in addition to any municipal �l g
considerations.
1 would also like to thank you, Bev, and Ron in assisting me in my review of the subject 1pt�ds.
:
Should you have any questions or wish to discuss this matter further, please contact me at 613-4.5-
4764. I
Yours truly,
Ray Valaitis
Rural Plattner
copy: Gail White Planner, Simooe County
John Taylor, Planner MMAH
Mike Toombs, Manager — Agricultural Land Use, OMAFRA
(rov)
I
• PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE
August 10, 2000
Susan Woods P- 107/00
Part of Lot 2, Range 2 (Oro)
Range Road
Proposal
The subject property is located in Range 2, Part of Lot 2 and has frontage on the
Range Road. The property subject to the rezoning is a total of 0.8 hectares (2
acres) in lot area was conditionally severed by the Committee of Adjustment on
June 15, 2000. One of the condition's was that the applicant's apply for a
rezoning to adequately reflect the intended use of the property for an institutional
use (seniors home). The applicant's have applied for a Zoning By -law
Amendment from the Agricultural /Rural (A/RU) zone to the Institutional (1) Zone.
Official Plan Currently — Rural
Proposed — No Change
• Zoning By -law Currently — Agricultural /Rural (A/RU) Zone
Proposed — Institutional (1) Zone
Department Head Comments
Roads Superintendent — No Concerns
Manager of Public Works — No Concerns
Fire Chief — No Concerns
Clerk — No Comments
Chief Building Official — No Comments
Recreation and Economic Development —
Planning Department Comments
The subject property is located within the Rural designation and would therefore
. be subject to the applicable policies within that designation. The permitted uses
within this designation allow for institutional uses.
• Section D3 of the Official Plan outlines the Rural policies for the Township. The
objectives of this designation clearly indicate that the intent is to preserve and
promote the rural character and maintain the open countryside of the Township.
In order to ensure these objectives are maintained a number of development
policies have been established.
Section D3.3.2 establishes the criteria to be reviewed prior to consideration of an
amendment by Council. This section also indicates that such uses may be
subject to Site Plan Control and this property will be required to submit a site
plan and enter into a Site Plan Agreement with the Municipality.
Subsection D3.3.2 indicates that Council shall be satisfied that the proposed
use:
a) Is compatible with the rural character of the area
Compatibility with the rural character can be impacted by both the use itself
and the scale of that use. The use itself as an institutional use will have an
impact on the rural character; however, by limiting the proposed use to a
maximum number of people (10 in this case) residing in the dwelling, the
impact on the rural character can be minimized.
• b) Can be designed and sited to blend in with the rural surroundings
To ensure that the use blends in with the rural community site plan control is
recommended to ensure that landscaping, fencing etc. is in place to buffer
neighbouring properties. On the subject property there is existing significant
wooded areas which will be maintained in order to provide buffers to all
adjoining properties.
c) Is located where it would have little or no impact on agricultural operations
There are currently no agricultural lands within the immediate vicinity of the
subject property which would be impacted by the proposed use.
d) Can be serviced with an appropriate water supply and means of sewage
disposal
The applicant's were in contact with the Simcoe County District Health Unit
prior to making application in order to ensure that the size of the proposed
severance was of sufficient size for the intended use. Written approval for
the Simcoe County District Health Unit will be required prior to final
consideration of this application.
�J
e) Is to be accessed by Municipal Roads that can accommodate the increased
traffic generated by the proposed use
The Roads Superintendent indicated that he had no concerns at the time of
the severance application. The entrance to the property is intended to be
from Range Road and an entrance permit approval would be required from
the Roads Department at that time. In relation to on -site parking, there must
be sufficient area designated within the property boundary for staff, residents
and visitors. This issue would be required to be addressed through the Site
Plan Agreement.
f) Will not cause a traffic hazard as a result of its location on a curve or a hill
As with Subsection (e) no concerns have been provided by the Roads
Superintendent to indicate that the proposed use would cause a traffic
hazard.
g) Can be appropriately buffered from adjacent residential uses
As indicated previously the property, if approved for rezoning, would be
subject to Site Plan Control. Existing wooded areas already ensure adequate
buffering from adjacent residential uses but the site plan would ensure any
• additional buffering as required.
u
Further to these criteria being reviewed for consideration and conformity
subsection D3.3.2 requires Council to be satisfied "that the proposed use cannot
be reasonably sited in a nearby settlement area ". The Rural Settlement Area
designations which would be nearby would include: Shanty Bay. The Rural
Settlement Area designation does permit institutional uses as of right subject to
rezoning. Within Shanty Bay the only lands for existing institutional uses are
zoned (ie. school, church). As well this property is within close proximity of the
Shanty Bay community and allows for a larger parcel size with additional
buffering compared to the existing parcels in the community.
Recommendation
It is recommended that Development Application P- 103(00 a proposed Zoning
By -law Amendment proceed to a Public Meeting in accordance with the Planning
Act requirements.
i
I
e)
the driveway accessing the proposed new lot will not cause a traffic
•
hazard as a result of its location on a curve or hill;
f)
the proposed lot is serviced with its own septic system approved by
the appropriate authority;
g)
the proposed lot is serviced with an appropriate water supply,
which may be an individual well or a well shared with a
neighbouring lot, provided an agreement has been entered into with
a neighbouring owner;
h)
the proposed lot area includes only the amount of land required for
the existing residential dwelling, water supply, and sewage
disposal system and will comply with the implementing Zoning
By -law.
D3.3.2 New industrial uses, institutional uses, commercial uses, golf courses,
small -scale ski facilities and corporate meeting facilities
New industrial, institutional and commercial uses that serve the needs of the
rural area and new golf courses, small -scale ski facilities and corporate
meeting facilities may be permitted subject to an amendment to the
implementing Zoning By -law. The creation of a new lot to permit any of these
• uses is generally not permitted. These uses may also be subject to Site Plan
Control.
Before considering an amendment to the Zoning By -law to permit any of these
uses in the Rural designation, Council shall be satisfied that the proposed use:
a) is compatible with the rural character of the area;
b) can be designed and sited to blend in with the rural surroundings;
C) is located where it would have little or no impact on agricultural
operations;
d) can be serviced with an appropriate water supply and means of sewage
disposal;
e) is to be accessed by municipal roads that can accommodate the
increased traffic generated by the proposed use;
f) will not cause a traffic hazard as a result of its location on a curve or a
hill; and,
g) can be appropriately buffered from adjacent residential uses.
48
ORO- MEDONTE OFFICIAL PLAN - FINAL
Adopted by Council February 5,1997
■J
E
0
Township of Oro - Medonte, PO Box 100, Oro, Ontario, LOL 2X0
Development Application
Application No. P- I o 7 I�
[ ] Application to amend the Official Plan of the Township �� _ 1-0q3
"A Application to amend the Comprehensive Zoning By -law
VN
[ ] Application for a Temporary Use By -law
[ ] Application to consider a Draft Plan of Subdivision
[ ] Other, please specify.
I/We hereby apply, as specified above, to the Corporation of the Township of Oro- Medome. It is expressly
understood that this application is in regard only to the lands as hereinafter described, and is made pursuant to the
provisions of The Planning Act, R.S.O., 1990. All costs associated with the application shall be paid as per the Tariff
of Fees By -law including all costs associated with an appeal of the application to the Ontario Municipal Board.
We enclose herewith application and processing fees in the amount of $2450.00 for an amendment to the Official
Plan ($1200.00 is a refundable deposit in accordance with the Tariff of Fees By -law).
I/We enclose herewith application and processing fees in the amount of $2450.00 for an amendment to the
Comprehensive Zoning By -law ($1200.00 is a refundable deposit in accordance with the Tariff of Fees By -law).
I/We enclose herewith application and processing fees in the amount of $2450.00 for a Temporary Use By -law
($1200.00 is a refundable deposit in accordance with the Tariff of Fees By -law).
I/We enclose herewith application and processing fees in the amount of
8,500.00 (100 lots or less);
8,750.00 (101 to 199 lots); or
9,000.00 (200 lots or more) for a draft Plan of Subdivision ($5500.00 is a refundable deposit in accordance with the
Tariff of Fees By -law).
DATED AT THE I OCfJ'h P OF CtZ - MEDWT(-sN THE CCU 1J`rY OF JINX49,
THIS �-') 11 'Z' DAY OF U. UY 1199'
Signature of Applicant or Authorized Agent
(To be witnessed by a Commissioner)
Signature of Commissioner —�
To be completed by the Applicant or Authorized Agent (Please print or tune)
Name of Applicant
Full Mailing Address
Telephone Number
2. Name of Applicant's Agent
Full Mailing Address
Telephone Number
S' c b01
II -I RAfi�t Rnjo R. # Z
-AAA LT,-t L DL ,z L_ 0
( -705-) -7a I - 0-7 -2�4
NOTE. All correspondence and communications will be directed to the Applicant's Agent
unless otherwise specified.
Township of Oro - Medonte, PO Box 100, Oro, Ontario, LOL 2X0
0 Development Application
Application No. P-
Full legal description of the property which is the subject of this Application including the name
of the former Municipality in which it is located, e.g. Lot 1, Concession 1, Township of Orillia,
and, if known, the area of the land covered by the proposed amendment.
ag -E-:Iq , 01� (�C R-E.S
To be answered by the Applicant (Please print or type)
4. 1.1 Are you the registered owner of the subject lands? Yes 6,"' No
1.2 Do you act on behalf of the registered owner? Yes_ No
• 2.1 Do you have an option to purchase the subject lands? Yes_ No
2.2 If so, what is the expiry date of the Option?
2.3 Have you an offer to Purchase or Agreement of Sale in respect of the subject lands, or any
portion thereof with the Registered Owner? Yes_ No
2.4 What is the expiry date of any Offer or Agreement mentioned in 4.2.3? N /rA
2.5 Is the above noted Option, Offer or Agreement conditional on the success or failure of this
Application? Yes_ No A
5. Present Official Plan designation(s) 'R.0 Q A L
6. Present Zone classification(s) Q.,u rL' AGQ-I CU LT V.f2 R L
7. Present Use of subject lands ()xt� -O-T
8. Proposed use of subject lands S (Ts o'F I0 ?EesztJ ( T 40 C-
9. Official Plan designation required
10. Zone Classification required I NST1Tt1A1T1 0)11 A C-
11. Applicant's reason, argument and/or justification for requiring the proposed Amendment(s) (attach
a supplementary schedule if necessary).
1�em C- t,t.S.t= . SOU rc 12CD A LUT
'fa r3E�G4JAT�� " 1KlSTITuTtO1.1V>L" 0W F=O2
Wi(+f,)GrC.b L's-C .
•
Township of Oro - Medonte, PO Box 100, Oro, Ontario, LOL 2X0
Development Application
Application No. P-
12. Supplementary and supporting material to be submitted by the Applicant:
All information as required under the Township of Oro - Medonte Development
Guidelines.
2. Survey or sketch prepared by an Ontario Land Surveyor showing:
[ ] Applicant's /Owner's total holdings of land in the subject area.
[ ] Land which is to be subject of the requested Amendment clearly indicated thereon (in the
case of an amendment, please provide ten (10) 11" X 17" copies of the site plan or
boundary survey).
[ ] The location, size and use of all existing buildings or structures on the subject lands and
on immediately adjacent properties. All topographical features shall also be shown.
• [ ] The location, width and names of all road allowance, rights -of -ways, streets or highways
within or abutting the property, indicating whether they are public travelled roads, private
roads, rights -of -way or unopened road allowances.
13. What other Provincial Ministries or other Agencies or individuals have been consulted with prior
to the submission of this Application? (eg. Ministry of Municipal Affairs, School Boards, District
Health Unit, County Engineer, etc.)
lid 0
'k 9(,.Pf-J)') i G P(�K i f1�C -NTS
14. Is the subject land or any land within 120 m (400 ft) of the subject land the subject of another
Development Application made by the applicant for approval of an Official Plan amendment, a
Zoning By -law amendment, a Plan of Subdivision, a Minor Variance, a Consent, or a Site Plan?
Yes_ No
If yes, please state which type of application, if known, the application number, and describe the
lands which are subject to this application.
NOTE: Only fully completed applications accompanied by the necessary supporting materials
will be processed
The personal information on this form is being collected pursuant to the Planning Act, R.S.O., 1990,
c.P.13 and will be used in relation to the processing of this Development Application. If you have any
questions, please ask at the Oro - Medonte Township Offices.
23 \/
-_ Oo 100 ,25 100.23 100. CRO M
96 100 ?9 1 ?8 10 10°10 10005 1g9'B2EooE�a'aaio'cw
�4 9�
J p0o a2 �� 30 100 ?9 00.29 00? 0013 100.,pp p2 100.69 99 23 aoll u o a
100.35 100. -_ jpp09 100. 9 1
g9 _
100.120 100 ?1 '9 19 _x_09 5_ a . 9 99. g 5S 9 " �- , 8 99,06
1 0' 99- 9 0 q9 22 RALL {EHCE
35 q9.
9 98 g 99. 80.94 .45•E 911 99 p1 '35.54
1000° 99 9rt(e+s) %5743 30 9 907
BEEF BoXEs 99.
w0o35) . 9 59 8 5p 9865 95,55 99,01 0. 90 66 4
(� P 15 9883 9 975 0 98.98.49
9846 9677
9613 98.
p9 98 ?0 9815
98.28
" 96. g52 9819 g7 92
98, 5 g7 81
7 23 97 34 07 56
rl 9
7.28
2 97 56 97 36 9 97.3 91. 97,43 g7.4j7 59
0�1� g7 S 9706 8710 w
.. a
0711 91.00 N
975 qj p3 97,01 6 92 96 66 ' 96#5 96 91 75
• 96
E� m 9665 9 57 9678
g6
��n Y 96'79
9b.65
q6 A2A 96 57 96.53 96.59 9657 965 96 Bp 96,56 8661 96'56
I 06 96'42 409660
�4 1O m 9631 to oAR 96 ?3 96.
f v� g f 96.20 9619 96 22 9611 96.25
6 9932 0618 9611 c 619 9637 96.24
i
�5! 9615 9
ice+ I 9595 95�V •.7�9 9586 9598 9814 9595 96.27
6'� .95.it) 95.96 � 95. 9571 9609 9584 95.91 36.26
TT
j•., . 95 68 95 60 95 8q 911
v 78 6
1 6 5
36 A9
9560 9564 9560 9555 95 69566 95 95 6 95 749596 95'0566 9 960 96 02 96.35
9 95.4 9581 95. 95. 19 570
' - 44 95 98
1
�+ 95. q5 33 954795 56 - 4 - 95 67 B3
\.: 47�# 43 9S 58 9"'59 95 95.
q 5 895.43 9532 95.
4 48 g5 49 9557 9565 95 62 <
�.' 052 95. 9580 q6 ?b
•t' 26 12 PAIN -�7S 48
9 z 95. PATH 95' -, 95 p4 pp 9 5 55 g5
\r 94 99 2 11 95. 9 9c
53 99 30 9540 9525 95 g51B 95.23 ; 583
32
`+ do 9516 95 w 95.26 9554
+• 95.28 95..
95 32 04 6 =
r� 95 5g2g5�1 9506 95 06 95' q5 p7 95 03 05 950 95.31 95.25
q5. 9511
��• \ 95p6 9 11
\i \ 94.98 84.93 g485
• 94.87 94 80 94 96
\� 9 9�7d4g491 9507 9x85 g506 9p'19
l O5 23
959526 9978 947
19417 A. 59464 94.79 9474 94\37'00•E O 75.21 9x76 �q89 7.9468 9488
g4. 9a 53
94,5A 94 A9 to TREE
4 4 45 94,5A 4. O 9460 q 32
9 9 93 i7 9415 94.55 945@ 4.32 9418 a 22 9 9452
dill 9412 94.21 P A.2� PATH 9419 ga10 9
q }ga O 7. art 9 8 - -__ 3.90 4 08
94 932 9S 9?.5s =m 94 08 9A.0 93 91 93 97"'x-- 9.5 � 94 00 9391 94 03 g4 0`Y�
s i ox�ts
U as � OI
B o n
�m 4
Y
oI LIMIT BETWEEN LOTS 1 AND 2 RANGE 2
48(1035)
e-
CA A s I � _ °_ -2
L*-
4C
Cal 'Al
I
I>
ur
0 CA
JI,
co VI
tA
TO I M
Itj I "
a:o
T
. .. . ... . . ...... . .........
• •
(43-
-,-A7
—7-4
IS
•
u
PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Trinity Community Church
Part of Lot 21, Concession 7 (Oro)
Line 7 South
Proposal
P- 104/00
August 10, 2000
The subject property is located in Part of Lot 21, Concession 7 and has frontage
on Line 7 South. The property subject to the rezoning is a total of 5.45 hectares
(13.4 acres) in lot area and is the subject of an application for consent currently
on hold with the Committee of Adjustment. The applicant's have applied for an
Official Plan and Zoning By -law Amendment to permit the Institutional use.
Official Plan Currently — Oro Centre Industrial/Commercial
Proposed — Same as above
Zoning By -law Currently — Agricultural /Rural Exception (A/RU*32) Zone
Proposed — Institutional (1) Zone
Roads Superintendent — No Concerns
Manager of Public Works — No Concerns
Fire Chief — No Concerns
Clerk — No Comments
Chief Building Official — No Comments
Recreation and Economic Development —
Planning Department Comments
The subject property is designated Oro Centre Industrial /Commercial in the
Township's Official Plan. The general intent of these policies is to establish a
focus area for new airport related and industrial and commercial development in
• the Township. The Oro Centre Industrial /Commercial Designation is subject to a
1
• detailed Secondary Plan being completed and approved prior to any
development occurring. The Secondary Plan would address matters such as:
a) form of servicing
b) financial implications related to servicing systems
c) form of access to all lands
d) land use compatibility and the mix, location and density of
proposed land uses.
e) phasing of development
f) environment impact of development
The Secondary Plan has been completed in a draft format (copy attached) and
has been subject to initial comments from the public and agencies. The formal
public meeting for this Official Plan Amendment took place on February 2, 2000
at that time comments were received from the Ministry of Transportation
requesting that the Township delay further consideration of the secondary plan
as they were conducting a review of the long term expansion of Highway 11.
Meetings have taken place with the Ministry to determine how the proposed
expansion would affect the Oro Centre Secondary Plan and another meeting is
established for staff on August 29. It is intended that subsequent to that staff
meeting a presentation would be made to Council to seek further direction
regarding the proposed Highway 11 expansion plans and the Oro Centre
. Secondary Plan.
On the be a a separate
Official Plan Amendment should be submitted in order to allow their application
to proceed parallel to the Secondary Plan process.
The proposed Official Plan amendment would have to maintain the intent of the
Oro Centre policies and conform with the intended servicing strategy. The
applicant's have submitted the following studies in conjunction with their
application: Stormwater Management Analysis and Sewage Servicing report.
These reports are required to be reviewed to determine how they meet the intent
of the Oro Centre policies. The main issue relates to the servicing of the subject
property as Oro Centre is intended to be a fully serviced area. In reviewing the
Servicing report it would appear that a standard Class 4 sewage system is being
proposed and that nothing is contained in the report to indicate how full servicing
is being considered to conform to the Oro Centre policies. Further information is
required from the applicant's in this regard.
The subject property is zoned Agricultural /Rural Exception 32 (A/RU *32) in
Zoning By -law 97 -95. Exception 32 restricts the development of new buildings
on the property and as such the rezoning is required for the proposed Church to
• be a permitted use within this area.
. Recommendation
It is recommended that Development Application P- 103100 a proposed Official
Plan and Zoning By -law Amendment not proceed to a Public Meeting until
additional materials are received regarding compliance with the Oro Centre
policies and these are reviewed by the Township Engineer.
3
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO- MEDONTE
Post Office Box 100
Oro Station, Ontario
LOL 2X0
VIA FACSIMILE & POST
ATTENTION: Ms. Andria Leigh, Planner
Dear Ms. Leigh;
RE: DEVELOPMENT & APPROVAL APPLICATIONS
OFFICIAL PLAN & ZONING AMENDMENTS & SITE PLAN CONTROL
Trinity Community Presbyterian Church Project
Oro Centre South - Part Lot 21, Concession 7
Township of Oro- Medonte (formerly Oro Twp) -Our Project No. 9478
7LC;EIVELD
'i
JP NTc
• Please find enclosed one (1) copy each of the duly authorized Official Plan & Zoning By -law
Amendment and Site Plan Control applications. We have included along with this correspondence
ten (10) site plans, 3 cheques, two in the amount of $ 2,450 for the processing of the Official Plan
'and - Zoning -By -law- Amendments - and - one- forlhe- amount_of $ -I- ,250_for Site -Plan approval__These_ -
applications complement the previously submitted severance application for the property. As
discussed, it would be our intention to withdraw our site specific Official Plan Amendment if the Oro -
Centre South Secondary Plan is approved during the review and circulation process. We would
appreciate if you could please let us know when the next Public Meeting could be scheduled.
We intend to provide in the very near future a draft Official Plan Amendment for your information
and review. Background information contained within the draft Official Plan Amendment will include
among other information, a preliminary planning and engineering summary of the identified site
development issues. Please review the enclosed drawings and applications and provide your
preliminary comments to the undersigned at (705) 726 - 6722.
Yours very truly
REINDERS D ASSOCIATES (BARRIE) LTD.
Mr. R Kelso, B.E.S.
Plan r
• C.C. Mr. Paul Miller, Building Committee Chairman
Rk., End.
Reinders and Associates (Barrie) Ltd. Architect, Consulting Engineers, Planners & Project Managers
Unit 1201, 54 Cedar Pointe Drive, Barrie, Ontario L4N 5R7
Phone: (705) 726 -6722 Fax: (705) 726 -9445
E -mail: reinders @mail.transdata.ca
•
Township of Oro - Medonte, PO Box
k ] Application to amend the Official Plan of the
N ] Application to amend the Comprehensive Zoning
(] Application for a Temporary Use By -law
[ ] Application to consider a Draft Plan of
[ ] Other, please specify
Oro, Ontario, LOL 2X0
Application No. P- 1II1-{-1 ,no
�0
UWe hereby apply, as specified above, to the Corporation of the Township of Oro - Medonte. It is expressly
understood that this application is in regard only to the land as hereinafter described, acrd- is'inade pursuant to the
provisions of The Planning Act, R.S.O., 1990. All costs also iated with the application shall be paid as per the Tariff
of Fees By -law including all costs associated with an appeal o the application to the Ontario Municipal Board.
I/We enclose herewith application and processing fees in
Plan ($1200.00 is a refundable deposit in accordance with
UWe enclose herewith application and processing fees
Cotnprehensive Zoning By -law ($1200.00 is a refundable
amount of $2450.00 for an amendment to the Official
Cariff of Fees By -law).
the amount of $2450.00 for an amendment to the
sit in accordance with the Tariff of Fees By -law).
UWe enclose herewith application and processing fees hn the amount of $2450.00 for a Temporary Use By -law
($1200.00 is a refundable deposit in accordance with the Tari 'of Fees By -law).
UWe enclose herewith application and processing fees in the a nount of
8,500.00 (100 lots or less);
8,750.00 (101 to 199 lots); or
9,000.00 (200 lots or more) for a draft Plan of Subdivision ($ 500.00 is a refundable deposit in accordance with the
Tariff of Fees By -law).
DATED AT THE City OF Barrie IN
THIS 21st DAY OF ,J„ng 200 .
Signature of Applilant or Authorized Agent
(To be witnessed bj a Commissioner)
1. Name of Applicant
Full Mailing Address
Telephone Number
2. Name of Applicant's Agent
Full Mailing Address
• Telephone Number
Trinity
County OF Sitncoe
Bxbaa pin Rousseau, a Catanubnx, W.
County of SYacoe, fm BuM Cm*uft AtataMM
B#n SspWm* 17, 2102.
Presbyterian Church
c/o Mr. Paul M ller, Unit 9, 521 Dunlop Street
Barrie,
(705) 726 -1881
L4M 4S4
Mr. Rav Keiso.IP.einders and
Unit 1201, 54 Cedar Pointe Drive
Barrie, Ontario L4N 5R7
(705) 726 -6722
(705) 726- 9445IFax
NOTE: All correspondence and communications
unless otherwise specified.
be directed to the Applicant's Agent
) Ltd.
1
C
•
•
Township of Oro - Medonte, PO Box ,
00, Oro, Ontario, LOL 2X0
Application No. R
3. Full legal description of the property which is th subject of this Application including the name
of the former Municipality in which it is located, e.g. L,ot 1, Concession 1, Township of Orillia,
and, if known, the area of the land covered by the )roposed amendment.
Part of Lot 21, Concession 7, Part f Part 5, Plan 51R -15045
(See attached plan)
To be answered by the Applicant (Please print or type)
4. 1.1 Are you the registered owner of the subject lai ds?
1.2 Do you act on behalf of the registered owner?
2.1 Do you have an option to purchase the subject lands?
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
2.2 If so, what is the expiry date of the Option?
2.3 Have you an offer to Purchase or Agreem
portion thereof with the Registered Owner?
2.4 What is the expiry date of any Offer or Agr
2.5 Is the above noted Option, Offer or Agree
Application?
Present Official Plan designation(s) Oro
Present Zone classification(s) A/R
Present Use of subject lands
Vac
Proposed use of subject lands
Chu
Official Plan designation required
oro
Zone Classification required
Ins
Applicant's reason, argument and/orjustifieation
a supplementary schedule if necessary).
An Official Plan Amendment is
requ:
the Severance Application. The
of the Township adopted Secondary
Yes Nom_
Yes No X
Yes X No__
Nnvambpr. 7000
of Sale in respect of the subject lands, or any
Yes X No
ent mentioned in 4.2.3? November, 2000
it conditional on the success or failure of this
Yes x No
ntre /Industrial Comm. (Adopted by Twp.)
J*-
an /Rural
rcl Use
C ntre /Industrial Commercial
ti utional
requiring the proposed Arrendment(s) (attach
in order to expedite the approval of
sal is in conformity with the policiies
for Oro Centre South but has been and
may contine to be held up by outstanding Agency comments. The Rezoning is
required in order to permit the de en of the Church proposal as it
is not presently a permitted use.
2
E
Township of Oro - Medonte, PO Box 400, Oro, Ontario, LOL 2X0
Application No. P-
12. Supplementary and supporting material to be submitted by the Applicant:
1. All information as required under the Township of Oro - Medonte Development
Guidelines.
2. Survey or sketch prepared by an Ontario Land Surveyor showing:
[ ] Applicant's /Owner's total holdings of land in the subject area.
(] Land which is to be subject of the requeste Amendment clearly indicated thereon (in the
case of an amendment, please provide t n (1 0) 11" X 17" copies of the site plan or
boundary survey).
[ ] The location, size and use of all existing buildings or structures on the subject lands and
on immediately adjacent properties. All tol iographical features shall also be shown.
[ ] The location, width and names of all road illowance, rights -of -ways, streets or highways
within or abutting the property, indicating whether they are public travelled roads, private
roads, rights -of -way or unopened road allowances,
13. What other Provincial Ministries or other Agencie or individuals have been consulted with prior
to the submission of this Application? (eg. Ministry of Municipal Affairs, School Boards, District
Health Unit, County Engineer, etc.)
Preliminary discussions with Simcoe County Health Unit
14. Is the subject land or any land within 120 in (400 It) of the subject land the subject of another
Development Application made by the applicant f r approval of an Official Plan amendment, a
Zoning By -law amendment, a Plan of Subdivision, Minor Variance, a Consent, or a Site Plan?
Yes No X
If yes, please state which type of application, if
lands which are subject to this application.
• Note: Lands are within Oro Centre
NOTE: Only (ally completed applications
will be processed.
The personal information on this form is being collected
c.P.13 and will be used in relation to the processing of th,
questions, please ask at the Oro - Medonte Township Offici
•
the application number, and describe the
Plan area.
by the necessary supporting materials
ursuant to the Planning Act, R.,S.O., 1990,
Development Application. If you have any
3
1\ T \ /
\ F'AVI \
_�_
----- --- -- / - - - -�
PROPERTY TO BE OBTAINED
FOR SHARED PARKING
FUTURE
I
RiVE��MES I
� p,
C
i
`.. 30,ao 2UILDRY $ETBACY.
I I
i I �
i
J6
� � I
1�
I
Ib2E.90m �
—
- - =�- ItYs T NEW ACCESS DRIVE
b
--- - - - - -- ------------ - - - -�Z
1
I
C°
o�
z�
QW
V, U
O w
W
!� U
rc I
0
1
a
rum onr cu rrmrt ,jNo
PARTIAL SITE PLAN - CONCEPT'K'
A1K 5C4LE 1:400 ME TRIG
SITE STATISTICS
? 517E AREA 54,450 m2 13.45 Ac
BUILDING AREA 182.1 m2 13,SO1 x
A -2 OCCUPANCY
SANCTUARY 400 +1 - PER5ON5
iPARKING REQV 200 SPACES
TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED 214 5PACE5
J z
OUTDOOR Ice AREA (J,6716_ Z
0v
3
Ic
18
1$28808
Ir
NEW ACCESS DRIVE a--
PAvW's w
EXTG MUNICIPAL
BUILDING
FIN FLOOR 287.19
•