11 16 1999 PAC AgendaTOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE
AGENDA
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 16,1999
•
1. Call to order by Chairman.
2. Declaration of Pecuniary Interest and the General
Nature Thereof - in Accordance with the Act.
3.
4.
5.
Adoption of the Minutes of October 19, 1999.
Correspondence and Communication
None
Deputations
7:00 p.m.
7:30 p.m.
Hillway Equipment Ltd. P-75/98
Concession 12, Part of Lots 8 & 9, and
Concession 13, Part of Lot 9 (Oro)
r c,ti ,~ :rat,,(
Gold Mountain Springs P-93/99 ~j~- `~ > - ~ ~~ ~ ~ t"`~ ~' ~~~~~
Concession 10, Part of Lot 3 (Oro)
6. Other Business
7. Adjournment
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE
MINUTES
OCTOBER 19, 1999
PRESENT: Sue Grant, Garry Fell, Peter Wigham, Paul Marshall,
Councillor Ruth Fountain, Mayor Ian Beard, Deputy Mayor
Don Bell
STAFF PRESENT: Andria Leigh
1. Chairman Peter Wigham called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
2. "DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST AND THE GENERAL
NATURE THEREOF - IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ACT."
None Declared.
3. Minutes
• Moved by Susan Grant, seconded by Councillor Ruth Fountain
That the minutes of the meeting of the Township of Oro-Medonte
Planning Advisory Committee held on July 13, 1999 be adopted as
amended with the Mayor being deleted as being present.
Carried.
4. Correspondence and Communication
None.
5. Deputations
7:00 p.m. Josip and Ana Stanesic -Proposed Official Plan
Amendment, P-96/99
Concession 4, Part of Lot 6 (Oro)
In Attendance: No One
Ms. Leigh explained to the Committee the proposal to redesignate the
property to permit the development of the subject property for a residential
subdivision. Ms. Leigh further provided the history of this application in
relation to the Official Plan review in 1997, Official Plan Amendment
Number 5 and its status. Ms. Leigh summarized the issues of the
Planning Report indicating that additional materials are required in order
to process the application and determine the appropriateness of the
application. The Official Plan policies are clear in relation to new
residential development not being permitted unless anticipated by the
Plan and no justification has been brought forward in relation to the
subject property.
Moved by Susan Grant, seconded by Paul Marshall
"It is recommended that Development Application P-96/99 a
proposed Official Plan Amendment not be processed further until
additional information is provided by the applicant in accordance
with the Official Plan. This information would include a proposed
plan of subdivision drawing, an Environmental Impact Statement and
Management Plan, and a Growth Management Settlement Strategy.
This information would be reviewed and evaluated by the Planning
. Advisory Committee prior to a further recommendation. "
...Carried.
6. Other Business
Groundwater Monitoring Meeting
Copies of the Terms of Reference and the notice of meeting were provided tc
the Committee for their review and comment. The Committee were invited to
attend the meeting on November 2 at the Township offices.
Oro Centre Information Meeting
Copies of the draft Official Plan policies were provided to the Committee for their
review and comment. The Committee vrere invited to attend the meeting on
November 23 at the Township offices. '^'~ s
Hawkestone Secondary Plan Information Meeting
w~~
The Committee ware invited to attend the meeting on November 22 at the
Township offices. This meeting will explain the secondary plan process, why
one is being undertaken, and the timeframe anticipated.
Adjournment
Moved by Deputy Mayor Don Bell, seconded by Garry Fell
That this meeting now adjourn at 8:10 p.m.
Carried.
Peter Wigham, Chairm Andria Leigh, Planner
F#
n
U
PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE
November 9, 1999
n
U
Hillway Egaipment Ltd, P-75!98
Pt of Lots 8 and 9, Concessions 12
and Pt of Lot 9, Concession 13 (Oro)
Proposal
On June 25, 1998 Hillway Equipment Ltd. submitted an application to amend the
Township Zoning By-law. The application applies to lands within Parts of Lot 8 and 9,
Concession 12 and Part of Lot 9, Concession 13 in the former Township of Oro as shown
on the attached map. The purpose of the application is to rezone the majority of these
lands from the Mineral Aggregate Resources Two (MAR2) to the Mineral Aggregate
Resources One (MARL) Zone to permit the development of a gravel pit. The lands have
a total area of approximately 250 acres and it is proposed to extract up to 650,000 tonnes
per year.
The lands that are the subject of the application are owned by three different parties
(Anderson, Bromley, and Johnston). These three owners have agreed to lease their
property to Hillway Equipment Ltd. for the purpose of obtaining a license to extract
gravel.
Official Plan Mineral Aggregate Resources
Zoning By-law Currently -Mineral Aggregate Resources Two (MAR2) Zone
Proposed -Mineral Aggregate Resources One (MARL) Zone
Deuartment Head Comments
Roads Superintendent-
Fire Chief - no objections or concerns
Clerk -
Chief Building Official - no objection if possible
Recreation and Economic Development - no concerns on the rezoning, possible road
problems given the proposed truck usage on a non-haul route
•
• Planning Department Comments
July 9,1998
The subject lands are cuaently designated Mineral Aggregate Resources in the Official
Plan. The permitted uses in this designation are limited to quarrying and the extraction of
gravel, sand and other aggregates and associated operations such as crushing, screening,
washing and aggregate storage. Section D5.3 of the new Official Plan contains the
conditions under which new mineral operations may be permitted through the passage of
an implementing Zoning By-law.
Section D5.3.1.2 states that all application for rezoning shall be supported by an
Environmental Impact Study that addresses:
a) the effect of the operation of the pit or quarry on:
• natural features and ecological functions of the area;
• nearby communities;
• agricultural resources;
• the character of the area;
• the groundwater table; and,
• Nearby wells used for drinking water purposes.
b) the effect of the increased truck traffic on the environment;
c) the suitability of the proposed haul routes;
d) the effect of the noise, odour, dust and vibration generated by the proposed use on
adjacent land uses;
e) how the site will be progressively rehabilitated to accommodate subsequent land
uses after the extraction has been completed; and
f) How the impacts from the proposed pit or quarry will be mitigated in order to
lessen those impacts.
Section D5.3.1.3 states that all applications for rezoning shall be supported by an
assessment of the added impacts of the proposed pit or quarry operation on the items
listed in Section D5.3.1.2 that also takes in to account the impacts of the existing and
• future pit operations in the area.
The applicant has not completed any of the studies required by the Official Plan to
support the application. However, the applicant's planner, Mr. Gary Bell, has requested
that he be permitted to make a deputation to the Planning Advisory Committee on 7uly
14, 1998 to identify the issues that will need to be explored and addressed as part of the
planning process. The applicant has also indicated that he will be inviting neighbours to
this meeting to provide them with the opportunity to heaz about the application and to
provide input to Planning Advisory Committee as required.
On the basis of the information submitted to date and my understanding of the proposal,
it is my opinion that it would be premature to recommend to Council that a formal public
meeting under the Planning Act be held. Instead it is recommended that the information
required by the Official Plan be submitted and be reviewed by the Township Planning
deparhnent and Planning Advisory Committee before the holding of a formal public
meeting is recommended to Council.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that:
• This report be received; and
• Additional information on Official Plan conformity be supplied by the applicant
• prior to Planning Advisory Committee making a recommendation to Council to
hold a public meeting in accordance with Section 34 of the Planning Act.
May 13, 1999 Planning Comments
On July 14, 1998 this application was presented to the Planning Advisory Committee
with the following recommendation being adopted:
Moved by Deputy Mayor Don Bell, seconded by Councillor Ruth
Fountain
It is recommended to Council that;
1. further impact studies be completed before this proposal proceeds
to a public meeting,
2. the applicant prepaze a report investigating the pros and cons of
siting a haul route going north to Bass Lake Side Road to the 13`h
Line and to the south through Rugby,
3. as a result of concerns of the Committee every attempt should be
made and documented to find an alternate route to the 13`h Line.
LJ
Since that time the applicant has been working towards completion of the required
studies and the haul route issue.
In discussion with the applicant, these studies will be provided to the Township the day
of the deputation and therefore no review will have been completed. Several on the
studies will require outside consultation peer review which will be determined once the
studies are reviewed by the Township Planner.
RECOMMENDATION
That the studies provided for Development Application P-75/98 be reviewed by staff
and/or consultants for a report and recommendation back to the Planning Advisory
Committee.
November 9, 1999 Planning Comments
In July of 1998 a recommendation was made by the Planning Advisory Committee that
all the required studies be completed and reviewed prior to a further recommendation
being made on this application for rezoning.
The following studies have been received:
• 1. Technical Background Report prepared by Skelton Bramwell and Associates Inc.
which includes a Preliminary Assessment of Groundwater Condition by Dixon
Hydrogeology
2. Traffic and Haul Route Investigation prepared by Skelton Bramwell and Associates
Inc.
3. Level 1 and 2 Environmental Report prepared by Skelton Bramwell and Associates
Inc
4. Noise Assessment prepared by Valcoustics Canada
5. Site Plan drawings prepared by Skelton Bramwell and Associates Inc.
The Traffic and Haul Route Investigation was provided to McCormick Rankin for a peer
review and was also provided to the County of Simcoe as per their request for review.
The Level 1 and 2 Environmental Report was provided to LGL Limited for a peer review.
The Preliminary Assessment of the Groundwater Conditions was provided to Jagger
Hims Ltd For a peer review.
Copies of the reviews for these reports are provided for the Committee's information and
review.
The LGL review generally indicates their support of the conclusions of the report;
however they do provide recommendations on a number of proposed changes or
questions. The conclusion of their letter does indicate that the conclusions of the report
• must be supported by a hydrogeological assessment of the site, a reliable definition of the
ground water profile, and a pit floor elevation definition that will protect those functions.
These issues are further discussed in the Jagger Hims peer review and should be
discussed with the applicant.
The Jagger Hims review indicates a concern with respect to the confirmed elevation of
the water table beneath the property. The review recommends that this should be
confirmed by means of boreholes and ground water monitors so that the final elevation of
the pit floor can be confirmed. Mr. Hims was asked to discuss the issue with the
applicant's consultant and this issue should be discussed with the Committee.
The Noise Impact Analysis prepared by Valcoustics was reviewed; it would appear the
report is complete. The Committee should ensure that the recommendations contained in
Section 9.0 are incorporated within the Site Plan drawings and the Zoning 13y-law.
At the time of writing this report the review from McCormick Rankin on the Traffic
Impact Analysis had not been received. Copies of their review and the planning
comments will be provided at the meeting for the Committee.
Initial comments were received from the County of Simcoe in July of 1998 indicating
they required a Traffic Impact Study to be completed to determine the potential need for
the applicant to undertake improvements to the road and/or intersection. The study was
to be completed to the satisfaction of the County Engineer. The Traffic Impact Analysis
• was provided to the County of Simcoe for their review; to date comments have not been
received and these should be available prior to a public meeting.
Until all of the comments/reviews have been received a complete planning report has not
been completed. As the Committee is well aware one of the main issues with respect to
this application is the traffic impact and the effect of this on the character of the
community. The peer review information is required prior to the final planning review
with respect to added impact, the Provincial Policy Statement, and the Official Plan.
RECOMMENDATION
That a further planning report be provided to the Planning Advisory Committee at their
December 1999 meeting with a recommendation regarding a public meeting.
• Additional Comments on Traffic Peer Review (November 16, 1999)
The review was completed by McCormick Rankin of the Traffic and Haul Route
Investigation and was submitted to the Township on November 12. A copy of that
review is provided for the Committee's reference. McCormick Rankin is satisfied that
the report has responded to the Council resolution from July 1998. They do indicate that
they generally concur with the report but have noted instances where additional
information detail should be provided or provided in a different format. These instances
are outline throughout the review and identified with arrows. These are summarized in
the conclusions with four recommendations. McCormick Rankin indicates their concern
in regard to the evaluation of the two haul routes and that the financial considerations are
what weigh the south haul route as the better alternative; they question if this is sufficient
rationale for the Municipality to approve such a haul route. McCormick Rankin has
indicated that the applicant should more explicitly present the conclusion that the south
haul route is the better alternative. McCormick Ranking suggest that the Township
identify the evaluation factors to be considered in the evaluation of the haul routes and
identify relative weightings if appropriate. The Committee should discuss this with the
applicant.
•
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE
AGENDA
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 16, 1999
1. Cali to order by Chairman
2. Declaration of Pecuniary Interest and the General
Nature Thereof - in Accordance with the Act.
3. Adoption of the Minutes of October 19, 1999.
4. Correspondence and Communication
None
5. Deputations
7:00 p.m. Hillway Equipment Ltd. P-75/98
Concession 12, Part of Lots 8 & 9, and
Concession 13, Part of Lot 9 (Oro)
Proposed Rezoning
'7:30 p.m. Gold Mountain Springs P-93199
Concession 10, Part of Lot 3 (Oro)
Proposed Official Plan Amendment and Rezoning
-Verbal Status Report from Planning Consultant
7:45 p.m. Township of Oro-Medonte
Concession 9, West Part of Lot I S (Medonte)
Proposed Rezoning
6. Other Busines s
?. Adjournment
•
• PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE
July 9, 1999
Gold Mountain Springs, P-93199
Pt of Lot 3, Concession 10 (Oro)
Proposal
The subject property is located in Concession 10, Pt of Lot 3 and has access to
Line 9 North. The property is a total of 100 acres in size. The applicant's have
applied for Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments to permit a spring water
bottling plant, warehouse, offices, and bulk spring water filling station.
Official Plan Currently -Agricultural, Environmental Protection Two
Overlay, and Groundwater Recharge Area
Proposed -Industrial, Environmental Protection Two Overlay,
and Groundwater Recharge Area
Zoning By-law Currently -Agricultural/Rural (A/RU) Zone
• Proposed -Economic Development Exception (ED*) Zone
Department Head Comments
Roads Superintendent -will road improvements and upgrades be addressed in
the site plan?
Fire Chief - no objections to this application
Clerk - no concerns, process for monitoring would be implemented with the
amendment, the municipality will have an opportunity to address road concerns
as well
Chief Building Official -engineered drawings required once rezoning completed
Planning Department Comments
In reviewing this application it is necessary to assess Section F2.3.2 and J3 of
• the Official Plan. Copies of both are attached for the Committee's reference.
1
• Section F2.3.2 specifically relates to water bottling plants and requires that
several matters be addressed as part of an application for Redesignation.
These matters include:
1. the effects of the extraction on the quantity and quality of water in adjacent
wells;
2. the long term impact of the extraction on the groundwater recharge function
and associated ecological systems; and
3. the impact of increased traffic generated by the water bottling plant on the
roads in the area.
These issues should be addressed and reviewed prior to a public meeting on this
application.
Other issues relating to site plan agreements and long term monitoring are also
required to be addressed during the processing on the application.
In discussions with the applicant's consultant, a letter will be forwarded for the
Committee's review to confirm all the studies to be completed as part of the
application.
• Recommendation
It is recommended that the studies required in accordance with the Official Plan
be received and review by Planning Advisory Committee prior to a
recommendation relating to a Public Meeting.
2
Skelton Bramwell
151 Ferris Lane, Suite 300
Barre, ON
L4M 6C 1 July 22, 1999
Gary Bell,MCIP,RPP
Re : Gold Mountain Springs Bottling Plant
Concession 10, West Half of Lot 3 (Oro)
Development Apnlication P-93/99
Dear Mr. Bell:
•
The Planning Advisory Committee at their regular meeting on July 13, 1999 reviewed
your correspondence dated July 9, 1999.
The Committee has made the following recommendation to Council:
Moved by Jeff Proctor, seconded by Ruth Fountain
"It is recommended that the studies as detailed in the Skelton, Bramwell letter dated July
9, 1999 required in accordance with the Official Plan be received and reviewed and
presented back to the Planning Advisory Committee prior to a recommendation relating
to a Public Meeting."
To date, this resolution has not been presented to Council due to summer recess but will
be presented at the next available meeting.
If your require any further information, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned.
Yours truly,
Andria Leigh, MCIP, RPP
Planner
• PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Gold Mountain Springs, P-93/99
Pt of Lot 3, Concession 10 (Oro)
Proposal
July 9, 1999
The subject property is located in Concession 10, Pt of Lot 3 and has access to
Line 9 North. The property is a total of 100 acres in size. The applicant's have
applied for Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments to permit a spring water
bottling plant, warehouse, offices, and bulk spring water filling station.
Official Plan Currently -Agricultural, Environmental Protection Two
Overlay, and Groundwater Recharge Area
Proposed -Industrial, Environmental Protection Two Overlay,
and Groundwater Recharge Area
Zoning By-law Currently -Agricultural/Rural (A/RU) Zone
• Proposed -Economic Development Exception (ED*) Zone
Department Head Comments
Roads Superintendent-will road improvements and upgrades be addressed in
the site plan?
Fire Chief - no objections to this application
Clerk - no concerns, process for monitoring would be implemented with the
amendment, the municipality will have an opportunity to address road concerns
as well
Chief Building Official -engineered drawings required once rezoning completed
Planning Department Comments
In reviewing this application it is necessary to assess Section F2.3.2 and J3 of
• the Official Plan. Copies of both are attached for the Committee's reference.
1
• Section F2.3.2 specifically relates to water bottling plants and requires that
several matters be addressed as part of an application for Redesignation.
These matters include:
1. the effects of the extraction on the quantity and quality of water in adjacent
wells;
2. the Tong term impact of the extraction on the groundwater recharge function
and associated ecological systems; and
3. the impact of increased traffic generated by the water bottling plant on the
roads in the area.
These issues should be addressed and reviewed prior to a public meeting on this
application.
Other issues relating to site plan agreements and long term monitoring are also
required to be addressed during the processing on the application.
In discussions with the applicant's consultant, a letter will be forwarded for the
Committee's review to confirm all the studies to be completed as part of the
application.
Recommendation
It is recommended that the studies required in accordance with the Official Plan
be received and review by Planning Advisory Committee prior to a
recommendation relating to a Public Meeting.
r
2
SECTION F2 -GROUNDWATER RECHARGE AREAS
F2.1 OBJECTIVES
• To protect the headwaters of rivers and streams.
• To protect the quality of water available for drinking water purposes.
• To ensure that the integrity of the municipality's watersheds are maintained or
enhanced.
• To ensure that the quantity of water in the groundwater table is protected.
F2.2 LOCATION AND DEFINITION
The Groundwater Recharge Area overlay designation applies to highland
azeas where infiltration to the shallow groundwater regime occurs. The upper
aquifer in these highland azeas discharges water into the headwaters of rivers,
streams and wetlands. The boundaries of the Groundwater Recharge Area
. overlay designation closely follow the boundaries of the Oro Moraine.
It is the intent of this Plan to provide a high level of protection to the •
groundwater recharge azeas by placing these areas in an overlay designation.
The uses permitted in these areas shall be those permitted by the underlying
designation provided the use conforms to the policies of this section.
F2.3 POLICIES
F2.3.1 New development in Groundwater Recharge Area
Any new development in the Groundwater Recharge Area overlay designation
that requires either an amendment to the implementing Zoning By-law or to
this Plan shall be supported by a hydrogeological assessment that addresses
the following issues the appropriate agencies and/or Council, as required:
a) the effect of the proposed use on the groundwater rechazge function
and the associated ecological systems including the potential impacts
on surface water resources;
b) the effect of the proposed use on the quality and quantity of drinking
water in adjacent wells;
106
ORO-MEDONTE OFFICIAL PLAN -FINAL
Adopted by Council February 5,1997
c) the effect of the proposed use on adjacent high capacity wells; and,
d) the degree to which the objectives of Section F2.1 aze met if the
amendment is approved.
The municipality shall consult with the appropriate agencies before making a
decision on such an application.
F2.3.2 Water bottling plants
A water bottling plant is considered to be an industrial use and is only
permitted in the Industrial designation.
Matters to be considered by the appropriate agencies and/or Council, as
required, where an application to amend the Official Plan is submitted
include:
a) the effects of the proposed extraction of water on the quantity and
quality of water in adjacent wells;
b) the long-term impact of the proposed extraction on the groundwater
recharge function and associated ecological systems; and,
c) the impact of the increased traffic generated by the water bottling plant
on the road network in the area.
If a water bottling plant is approved, the owner shall be required to enter into a
Site Plan Agreement and/or Development Agreement that specifies, in
addition to all other matters normally dealt with in a Site Plan or Development
Agreement, that the owner will be responsible for the establishment and
operation, in consultation with the Township and the Ministry of Environment
and Energy, of a long-term monitoring program.
The purpose of such a long term monitoring program would be to assess the
long term impacts of the water taking on the recharge function and to
determine whether the objectives contained in Section F2.1 aze being met.
The monitoring program shall include details of the nature and location of the
proposed monitoring wells and of the nature and frequency of the monitoring.
The monitoring program shall also specify that the appropriate measurements
would be taken in the monitoring wells before the water-taking has
commenced and at regular intervals subsequent to the commencement of the
water-taking.
The Township shall consult with the appropriate agencies prior to the
consideration of the monitoring program
107
ORO-MEDONTE OFFICIAL PLAN -FINAL
Adopted by Council February 5,1997
. PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE
November 8, 1999
Township of Oro-Medonte, P- /99
Part of Lot 16, Concession 9 (Medonte)
Proposal
The subject property is located in Concession 9, Part of Lot 16 and is located at
344 Moonstone Road East. The property is the site of the former Township of
Medonte Administration Building and is located at the easterly extent of the
settlement of Moonstone. The property is a total of 10.66 acres owned by the
Township which includes the Administration Building and Public Works Building.
The area proposed to be sold is a total of 2.464 acres and incorporates the
Administration Building only. A Reference Plan is attached for reference
purposes.
Official Plan Currently -Rural Settlement Area
• Proposed -Same as above
Zoning By-law Currently -Institutional (I) Zone
Proposed -Local Industrial (LI) Zone
Department Head Comments
Roads Superintendent -Drainage from the Public Works yard flows naturally
across the rear yard of the former Township Office to the Old County Road. This
will be mainly sheet flow drainage that will occur in the spring or heavy rain
storms but will not effect the use of the Township Office Building.
Fire Chief -
Clerk -Excellent use of property
Chief Building Official - No objection
Recreation and Economic Development -
• Public Works - No concerns
1
. Planning Department Comments
The subject property is located within the area defined as the Rural Settlement
Area of Moonstone. Permitted uses within this designation include small scale
industrial development in the form of repair garages, warehouses, workshops or
manufacturing and/or fabrication plants. Section D4.3.3 of the Plan establishes
the criteria for reviewing new industrial uses; it indicates that Council must be
satisfied on five matters before considering an amendment.
1. The proposed use is compatible with the character of the Settlement Area.
The proposed use would be incorporated within the existing building and
there would be no outside storage in accordance with the Zoning By-law.
The abutting properties include the Township and County Public Works
Garages and the property across the Moonstone Road is proposed to be a
Residential Plan of Subdivision.
2. The proposed use serves the needs of the Settlement Area and/or the Rural
Area.
The proposed use would be a mail order business which would serve the
• Rural Area as well as a larger market outside of the municipality.
3. The proposed use can be serviced with an appropriate water supply and an
appropriate means of sewage disposal.
The property currently has an existing sewage system on the property which
services the existing building. The property is also already connected to the
private water system in Moonstone and this connection will continue
regardless of change in ownership.
4. Adequate parking and loading facilities and landscaping can be provided on
site.
The Zoning By-law requires parking and loading spaces on the use and the
size of the building. The existing building is 37 square metres (1398.7 square
feet) and would require 1 loading space and 2 parking spaces. This amount
of parking is more than accommodating in the existing gravel parking area.
Where a proposed use abuts or is in close proximity to an existing residential
use, fencing, landscaping, berming or a combination of these features shall
be utilized to ensure that there is adequate screening between the uses.
2
• The existing building is not currently located in close proximity to an existing
residential use. However the property is well landscaped from the
Moonstone Road and would not require additional buffering from the
proposed Plan of Subdivision unless additional buildings or expansion of the
existing building is occurring.
All of the above criteria can be satisfied and on this basis the rezoning to Local
Industrial would appear to be appropriate.
Recommendation
It is recommended that the proposed Rezoning for Concession 9, Part Lot 16
(Medonte) proceed to a public meeting.
3
-MYIAR
O~
N
.*p
PLAN AND FIELD NOTES OF SURVEY OF
PART OF NfV2 EOT 16, CONCESSION ~
TOWNSHIP OF MEDONTE
COUNTY OF 51MCOE
SCALE '. I INCH = 100 FEET
PAUL R. KITCHEN, O.LS.
1981
'~C>
~l?
6'yy~^'
e~T
v
A
~g
A'
~
W ~
I
~J xz,i
SW CORNEq I~f~E~
tDi K, CON ~6~
m sA•~E '
.
'
~a wi
us ~
ROAD >e ALLOWANCE
U t
Z
r
~
(
^
f`
o a
COUNTY ROAD
BETWEEN LOTS
Sl
3. i
,G<; FART 3 ~s ~
FAA" `1R - 6A53
U.i
n
a
7
I~
Y F
:~ ~
b
`
C •
4= s 9
>'
wu
N' 19 ,a .m
IS AND 16~
MN•CE
t
MTV
~•E
`'
PART l
AREA=2.464Ac.
ziu
DEPOSITED UNDER
REGISTRY ACT
GATE: NOVEMBER 30 1981__
BE
PAUL R. KITCHEN
ONTARIO LAND SURVEYOR
o
I
F
N
el w 1
w
w
o ti
OI
z
3
QO I
,>
"1 ~ F
J
a_ '
r = ,` ,
`~`
O (~~
IS NOT 4 PLAN OF
WITHIN THE MEANING
INNIN6 ACT
LAN 51 R -_11J8z1?_
OEIVED AND DEPOSITED
DATE _ _"'~'G'~_-"`T_H~~ _
,_.....y: _, _
DEPUTY LAND REGISTRAR FOR
THE REGI57RY DIVISION OF
SIMCOE IN° 511
P4RT i - LOi 14 CONCESSION 9
-iNST NA 64A855
LEGEND
5.1.6-- DENOTES 4 1" 50, ST4NDARD IIXXJ BdR LMJ
0------~- DENOTES MONUMENT VIdNTED.
^------- DENOTES MONUMENt fOUNO
SSl6----- DENOTES 41°50 SEANDAg01RON BdR 2'LONG.
DISTANCES qRE IN FEET AND DECbNALS pF FEET
BEARINGS 4RE 45TR WOMIC, OEflrvEO FROM THENORTHEFLY
OMIT a LOf 15, CONCESSION 9, SHOWN AS N59°12E IXJ
PL4N 51R~6A53.
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE
_~ 1 CERTIFY iH4T:
I. THIS SURVEY 4ND PLAN 4RE CORRECT 4ND IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE SURVEYS 4CT 4N0 THE
REGISTRY 4CT ANp THE REGUl4Tl0 N5 MADE
THEREUxDER,
2. THE BURVEY WAS COMPLETED ON THE 25m pAY OF
NDVEMBER, 1981. /////JJ7 //~/J1//
NDV_EMBER 30 1981y _ ~_[~~
PAUL R. eRCHEN
ONTARIO L4ND SURV EYOF
PAUL R. KITCHEN
ONTARIO LAND SURVEYOR
RIDGE ROAD-HAWKESTONE, ONTARIO
467-3747
.,... .... _.._.. _ I.......
• - ~' __
-- I REOUWE THIS PLPN TO BE 06VSItEO
UNOEF rxE »ECSrRr dcr. PLAN 5fR-2456
PLAN OF SURVEY
RECENED ANO DEPO61TE0:
G
OF PART Of LOT f V
CONCESSION 9
TOWNSHIP of MEDONTE
~y~~.
M ^
T ~~
DdiE: SEPTEMBER 25, 1990. DdtE: lrti
)
COUNTY OF SIMCOE
SCALE 1 inch = 100 feet
6URVEYOR: J.E. POTTAGE, O. LS.
~ ~~
J~.~w,tyr>_ ~SS1:
O
L
I Oi ~ O plidhl0 LdNO
SUR/EYOR REtlSiHi
pV151CN OF SIMCO~ 1~
Papi I-Pdpi Of LOT 16, CONCESSION 9
5 P-,cOGli PART DR IN$T 99>599
z E' ~1~
T
e T
x
sse ~ e2o.v I
I
ssre /al I
e63lgs D'w
s~ - I CAUTION: THI$ PLAN IS NOTA PLAN OF 5;,37+ngON
~ WITHIN THE MEANING OF HE
~ PLANNING ACT
PART 2
., r v4'SJ9
PART i
o v
~ SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE
5a
+ <RE<= =. ss ~
i ~ ,,l Fi,i, i.a -
B „ol Ixl,°, IB) i
~
e E TMf ...p . _ ._ ._ - <:
.
B
.E.F si
Ix .
.... .. w..,._. ,~
m ' ,.,
~~ .
_ °'
_ c E c x:
cq
A4' ~ ~+. .._e.. so o•+•>o r.Ew
scarexFEF ze
,
~ _.
z Ig3,yv ' , ._2.y o, .::c-. ,P3J"<' ow
e ..._..
= _ _ n
~rc^
o
_
_ _
_ e
h .
n m
~
O ~o
rv -
F.
_
1v
3
LEGEND
m ~ f ` V ' F m a F
U CT • H _, i " t ° °PB ~POx BF
El
'B
i
f
•r ~ N q e
~ IFON BeF
YEx
IB
O
~EB
R 2~
c 02 ^ BENBiE9 i xOx B6F
F. ^ OExOiEl 0.axTE0 rFOn FaF
-- i
~
a
m
P
E 2~ 2 n
B[aaina5 eFE KiWxON~[ axB aRE FEfEPREO i0 ixE
l.v. [OFx FF Oi 5•~
I
I I~xii. l6ila] B SS~B IB]a) ~e 11190 1 ~ ~ xOFiNEFty Oi wxi FOaO 19, 9NOwx al
t'•Ni i
y
E
lOi ie. COx.s ~e ~ ON vlaN era-la
l9 r
x
BE9F~x6 Oi E'E 820.
xav~x4 • \
U ~-.r- 6 ti'llxsi, lel l.ee s°rl ^'-~-xf9°~1'E ~ ~ fe•°~'o
Q_ xse°~SE b1O 11 x 12 +ee, ii xa9°12E a. I~x9i. _a2•fi • O')
3 = IF1„ .. PN. e,1e.,.,...,a .>.,, a. ~sBll COUNTY ROAD No. i9
~ RCnO ALLO WA NLE between LOTS i5 and t6
0
O
ac , i
_~=
~.x'
O'OALE ~ POTTAGE LTD.
ONTARIO LAND SURVEYORS
CANADA LANDS SURVEYORS
538 EUZA BETH STREET BOX 55
MIDLAND, ON iAR10 L4R 4L1 (]05)526-5612