Loading...
06 15 1999 PAC Agenda TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA TUESDAY, JUNE 15, 1999 • 1. Call to order by Chairman. 2. Declaration of Pecuniary Interest and the General Nature Thereof - in Accordance with the Act. 3. Adoption of the Minutes of May 17, 1999. 4. Correspondence and Communication None 5. Deputations 7:00 p.m. HanninenlDodson -Proposed Golf Course P-79/98 Concession 2, Part of Lots 10 and D (Oro) 7:45 p.m. Pierre and Jean Chenevotot -Proposed Temporary Use By-law for Garden Suite P-92/99 Concession 5, Part of Lot 21 (Medonte) 8:15 p.m. Beverley Plummer -Proposed Temporary Use By-law - P-91!99 Concession 2, South Part of Lot 12 (Oro) 6. Other Business 7. Adjournment . TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE MINUTES MAY 17, 1999 PRESENT: Sue Grant, Garry Fell, Peter Wigham, Paul Marshall, Jeff Proctor, Councillor Ruth Fountain, Mayor Ian Beard, Deputy Mayor Don Bell STAFF PRESENT: Andria Leigh 1. Chairman Peter Wigham called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 2. "DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST AND THE GENERAL NATURE THEREOF - IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ACT." None declared. 3. Minutes Moved by Ruth Fountain, seconded by Jeff Proctor That the minutes of the meeting of the Township of Oro-Medonte Planning Advisory Committee held on May 4, 1999 be adopted as circulated. Carried. 4. Correspondence and Communication None. 5. Deputations 7:00 p.m. HanninenlDodson -Proposed Golf Course, P-83/99 Concession 3, Part of Lots 10 and D (Oro) In Attendance: No one present Ms. Leigh updated the Committee that the delegation was being deferred until the peer review was completed by Mr. Dale Toombs of the report received from Bev Agar and Ron Mills regarding Agricultural Capability of the subject lands and the surrounding area. It was anticipated that this • would be completed in order for a delegation to be scheduled at the June meeting. 7:45 p.m. Keenan/Long -Proposed Zoning By-law Amendment, P- 86t99 Concession 10, Part of Lot 6 (Medonte) In Attendance: Joyce Long Discussion occurred regarding the history of how the two dwellings were constructed and the Official Plan policies which were in place at the time of construction. The concerns of the Chief Building Official were re- iterated and the applicant was advised that these were required to be satisfied prior to formal consideration of a Zoning By-law Amendment. Concern was expressed regarding approval of the zoning by-law prior without ensuring that the consent application is submitted. It was suggested that the by-law only be given two readings until the consent application is given conditional approval or alternatively that the by-law not proceed past the Public Meeting until the consent application is given a decision by the Committee of Adjustment. Moved by Susan Grant, seconded by Deputy Mayor Don Bell "THAT Development Application P-86199 a proposed Zoning By-law Amendment proceed to a Public Meeting." ...Carried. 8:00 p.m. Hillway Equipment Ltd. -Proposed Aggregate Operation - Concession 12, Part of Lots 8 & 9 and Concession 12, Part of Lot 9 (Oro) In Attendance: Gary Bell, Glen Stewart Discussion occurred regarding the status of the required reports as required by the July 14, 1998 recommendation. Mr. Bell indicated that the majority of the reports were completed with the exception of the noise report and all would be submitted to the Planner within the next two weeks. Ms. Leigh explained that upon receipt of the reports a determination will be made which reports require peer review by outside consultants other than the Environmental report in accordance with • Council policy. • Moved by Susan Grant, seconded by Deputy Mayor Don Bell "THAT the required studies provided for Development Application P- 75/98 they be reviewed by staff and/or consultants. And further, that a report and recommendation from the Planner be presented to the Committee once the review is completed." ...Carried. 6. Other Business None. 7. Adjournment Moved by Paul Marshall, seconded by Garry Fell l~ That this meeting now adjourn at 9:00 p.m. Peter Wigham, Chairman Carried. Andria Leigh, Planner • PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE March 11, 1999 Hanninen/Dodson, P-83/99 Pt of Lots 8, Lot 9, 10 and Road Allowance, East Pt of Lot D, Concession 2 (Oro) Proposal The subject property is located in Concession 2, Pt of Lots 8,9, 10 and Lot D and has access to Line 1 South. The property is a total of 367.25 acres in size. The applicant's have submitted apre-consultation application and are proposing to amend the Oro-Medonte Official Plan and Zoning By-law for an 18-hole golf course, clubhouse, and related facilities. Official Plan Currently -Agricultural and Environmental Protection Two Overlay Proposed -Rural and Environmental Protection Two Overlay . Zoning By-law Currently - AgriculturaURural (A/RU) Zone Proposed -Private Recreational (PR) Zone Department Head Comments Roads Superintendent - if approved, would need agreement to provide compensation for additional maintenance that would be needed due to increased traffic and possible road upgrades Fire Chief - no objections to this application Clerk -concerns were expressed in this area regarding traffic when ball diamonds were located (illegally) in the area, condition of the road and increased traffic may require special attention, who owns the residential properties in the boundaries, are they associated with the golf course Chief Building Official - as long as no conflict with existing golf course on Concession 2 (Oro) no objections • Planning Deaartment Comments In reviewing this proposal the Provincial Policy Statement, Official Plan and Zoning By-law were reviewed to determine the appropriateness of the application. Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) "Rural Areas" are defined in the PPS as "lands in the rural area which are not 'prime agricultural areas'". "Prime Agricultural Areas" are defined as "an area where prime agricultural land predominates and includes specialty crops andlor Canada Land Inventory Classes 1,2 and 3". The subject property as indicated on the attached portion of the Canada Land Inventory map, is within Classes 1 to 3 (with topography and fertility constraints) and is therefore considered a "Prime Agricultural Area" and not a "Rural Area" in accordance with the Provincial Policy Statement. In fact the surrounding area is within the same classification and would also be considered a Prime Agricultural Area. Upon site inspection of this area it is evident that the area is predominantly agricultural. • Policy 1.1.2 of the PPS requires that sufficient land be provided in a Municipality to promote employment opportunities and to accommodate growth for a period of 20 years. The Oro-Medonte Official Plan adopted in February 1997 does designate sufficient lands for these purposes and further stipulates in its Vision that this was the basislintent of the policies. It is recognized that recreational development in the form of golf courses are encouraged in the rural areas; however sufficient rural areas are designated in the Official Plan to satisfy the policies of the PPS. Section 2.1 Agricultural Policies indicates that prime agricultural areas are to be protected for agriculture. As indicated above, the subject lands and surrounding lands fall within the PPS definition of prime agricultural areas and as such must be protected for agricultural use. The development of a golf course would not maintain these policies or protect the property for agricultural use. Section 2.3 Natural Heritage includes significant woodlands, which are found on the subject property and are further identified as Environmental Protection Two in the Oro-Medonte Official Plan. This Section indicates that development and site alteration is permitted in significant woodlands only after it has been demonstrated that there will be no negative impact on the natural features or ecological functions for which the area is identified. This has not been satisfied . to date by the applicant. This policy further states that nothing in Policy 2.3 is intended to limit the ability of agricultural uses to continue. The proposed 2 • development of a golf course would not permit agricultural activities to continue on the subject property. Official Plan The subject property is designated Agricultural with an Environmental Protection Two Overlay for the significant woodland in the Oro-Medonte Official Plan. As part of the Vision for the Official Plan, the agricultural areas of the Township are considered to be an important component of what makes up the character of the community. These areas are intended to be preserved for future agricultural use so that they can continue to play a significant role in the local economy. The fragmentation of agricultural areas or the introduction of incompatible uses in these areas is strongly discouraged by the Official Plan. The Vision further stipulates that enough land for commercial, industrial, and residential uses has been identified to last until 2016 (20 years). The application to permit an 18-hole golf course in an agricultural area would not maintain the vision established in the Official Plan. Section D2 -Agricultural As indicated under the review of the Provincial Policy Statement, the subject property is Classes 1 to 3 according to the Canada Land Inventory mapping and the surrounding lands are also within these designations. This information is utilized in Section C1.2 to determine that the designation of the subject property and the surrounding lands as Agricultural in the Official Plan is appropriate. The objectives of the Agricultural designation are to: - maintain and preserve the agricultural resource base of the Township; - to protect (ands suitable for agricultural production from development and land uses unrelated to agriculture; and - to preserve and promote the agricultural character of the Township and the maintenance of the open countryside. The proposed golf course would not maintain the objectives of the Agricultural designation and would not preserve the land for agricultural production or protect it from development unrelated to agriculture. LJ 3 • Section F1 -Environmental Protection Two The objective of this designation is to minimize the loss or fragmentation of significant woodland features and the habitats and ecological functions they provide; and to maintain and enhance the ecological integrity of the natural heritage system. The policies indicate that new development is discouraged by this Plan. However, if new development is intended to occur an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and Management Plan (MP) are required to 6e submitted for review to the satisfaction of Council. No information has been submitted to date by the applicants to determine whether the proposed golf course would have a negative impact on the natural heritage features and therefore compliance with these policies has not been satisfied. Section J3- Amendments to the Plan When the Official Plan was adopted by Council and the Province it was determined that sufficient lands were designated for residential, commercial, and industrial uses for the next 20 years. This section stipulates that this requirement has been satisfied and further indicates that the lands identified as agricultural or • rural will not change in the Official Plan. On the basis that sufficient lands are designated for the next 20 years, no site- specific amendments will be considered by Council for a period of 5 years. The Official Plan is only intended to be amended if it is determined that an issue has arisen which was not addressed by the Official Plan and which needs to be considered comprehensively or alternatively that a site specific proposal needs to be addressed in a comprehensive manner. The proposal for an amendment to the Official Plan from Agricultural to Rural for the proposed golf course would not satisfy this section as there is no comprehensive issue which is required to be addressed. Zoning By-law The subject property is currently zoned Agricultural/Rural (A/RU) in By-law 97- 95, as amended. The current zoning maintains the intent of the Agricultural designation in the Official Plan and is considered appropriate for the subject property. The Zoning By-law Amendment to a Private Recreational (PR) zone is not appropriate without the Official Plan Amendment being considered favorably initially. LJ 4 • Summary The proposed application for an amendment to the Official Plan and Zoning By- law to permit an 18-hole golf course does not comply with the Provincial Policy Statement, Official Plan or the Zoning By-law and should not proceed to a formal Development Application. The application does not maintain the intent or principles for development of this area in the Official Plan. Lands within the Rural designation do permit golf courses subject to a rezoning and satisfaction of a number of criteria and this is the appropriate designation for a new golf course. Sufficient lands are designated Rural in other areas of the Township and the applicants should be encouraged to look for lands within this designation. Recommendation That Pre-Consultation Application P-83/99 not proceed to a formal Development Application. LJ Mav 13. 1999 Comments At the March 1999 meeting this application was deferred to determine if in fact the parcel was separate. Copies of the severance deeds have been provided to the Township to confirm the separate lot. Agar and Associates have provided an agricultural assessment for the subject property with a supplementary report from Millsptan on the surrounding Lands. These have been provided to Toombs Consulting for a peer review which was expected to take 2-3 weeks and would be available for the June 15~' meeting. This application should be deferred until the peer review can be provided to the Committee. June 9. 1999 Comments The peer review by Toombs Consulting has been completed and is attached for the Committee's review. Mr. Toombs reviewed both the work of Agar and Associates on the subject property and MiIIsPlan on the surrounding lands. There is some question as to why the initial review was not completed through . Agar and Associates for both the subject property and the surrounding lands 5 • which was discussed at the initial Planning Advisory Committee meeting as being required. Mr. Toombs report indicates that the designation of both the subject property and the surrounding lands as Agricultural in the Oro-Medonte Official Plan is appropriate and raises additional issues if the golf course were to proceed, in relation to the Minimum Distance Separation calculations. Based on Mr. Toombs review, the analysis and recommendation above (March 11, 1999) are still considered appropriate and the application should be denied. 6 06109/1999 16:17 705-324-0512 TOOMBS CONSULTING AGRICULTURAL REVIEW June 9, 1999 Prepared by: TOOMHS CONSULTING 15 Walker Street, Lindsay, Ontario, K9V SZ8 Harrmnen !Dodson Golf cotust Proposal part Lots 10 and D, Cmtcasion 2 (Oro) Township of Oro-Medonte> Siatcoe Cotmty Pac~E e2 Toombs Consulting has bees retained by the Township of Oro-Medonte to provide a pcer review of the Agricultural Capability std Impact Study prepared by Agar & Associates and of the Area Review prepared by MtllsPlan Consulting Services. Both reports are in support of a proposed golf cotuse on a 175 acre pivperty located at Part Lots 10 and D, Concession 2 former Township of Oro. The following materials were used for the review of the reports: 1989 aitphotos 1999 assessmont mapping illustrating the parcol sizes, Canada Land Invcruory mapping at a scale of I: 50,000, Schedule `A' of the Official Plant A siu visit and a ravlew of the surrounding land area on MaY 31, 1949 The following ate comments aad opations regarding each report AGAR & ASSOCIATES STUDY Thin report details the soils on site and the potential impacts on abttttutg agicultutal uses. There; is general agreement with the findings of the detailed soil capability study. It is noted that the 3 acre lot severed from the subject lands appears to be incorrectly located. Asaeasmrnt mapping and airphoto indicate the lot is situated is the north west comer of Lot 10, not farther south as illustrated on the map. The lot would be in the arcs mapped as Class Swi. The result is that Class 1-3 totals 88.5 acres and Class 4-1 >s 87.3 acres. The poorest soils are concentrated on the north portion of the site. 'These lands are wet and not suitable for farming. The south portion of the site, south of the water course, is part of a larger agiculnual area. Half of the property or 88 acres is Class 1-3; 76 acres has been ct+opped. With this split of good to poorer soils and the area of cIcarcd farmed land, the arcs review becomes very important • In regard to surrounding Iand uses, we have several comments. 06109/1999 16:17 705-324-0512 TOOMBS CONSULTING PAGE 03 LJ Lot 10, Concossion 1 It is our opinion the barn that was used for dairy cattle should not be exempted $otrr application of the MI,~S distances. The 4 non-farm reridenccs cited are all far enough from the former dairy barn to corttply with the NIDS requi:erneats. They are Type `A' land uses as def-mod by the MDS tables. 'These residences regrrim a separation distance of 160 meters from the bam and 112 meters from the tnatture storage. None of these residences conflict with I\rIDS nor pose arty restrictions to the use of the barn in a similar manner. The golf course is a Type `B' land use and, as noted in the report, does require soparation diataacea of 380 metes from the barn and 326 meters from a manure storage. Permitting the golf course will conflict with MISS tequirernents of this barn. This aa'c will intrude 258 meters into the subject laztds and exclude appmxlrrately 24 acres. Lot 9 Concession 2 The report reforences a large bank barn to the south that is actively farmed. At dte time of the site visit, Mr. Don Hannien indicated that an engineering repoR was forthcoming to indicate that the barn was not capable of housing Gveatock. If this tepoR is unavailable, this barn would require an IvII~S distance of 300 motere. 'Ittia distance will reach Zt)D meters into the subject parcel Land to the east • Our observation of the lands to the east is that they are priatarily in active agricultsue gtvwing either row crape or forages. The only wooded areas are the fence rows and ono minor woodlot in Lots, Range 2. Along the second Line, there are a number of largo livestock fazats. There is a dairy farm with a liquid manure system in Lot 22, Concession 3. The distance complies with Iv1DS. There i8 also a vacant bam that was used for beef cattle in Lot 23, Cone~asion 3. Iv1DS requires 300 meters separation. The actual distance is 320 meters to the north east corner of the subject site. Active agricultural wes abut the subject lands to the west, south and east MILLSPLAN CONSULTING SERVICES REPORT This report reviews the Larger area in support of changing the official plan designation from Agriculture to Rural The trapping attached to the report was analyzed. The Rural Area delineated on the sketch is a representation of the wooded area 1a our opinion, this suggested Rural and the remaining lands that would be Agriculture area do not meet the pazametera of identifying agricultural azeas for official plan purposes. Such an area review would be based on the following parameters. The agricultural designation should identify large contiguous azeas of farmland where • prime ap~icultural soils predominate. This will be the prime agticuhrual area of the Toombs Cortwlting, 15 Walker Street, Lindsay, Ontaao K9V SZ8 Te1705-324-0184 Fax 705-324-0512 06(0911999 16:17 705-324-0512 TOOMBS CONSIJLTIN6 PAGE 04 municipality. The purpose is to identify areas whets agricultural soils will be available on a long-term basis and agriculture can continue with a mitrimum of conflict from non- agricultural uses. Prime agrieulttaai areas are comprised of soils that are Clara 1 to 3 agricultural soils as identified by Canada Land Inventory ntapptng at a scab of 1 : SO,000_ Soils with as agricultural rating of Clare 1 to 3, a sail complex where Class 1 to 3 soils predominate or specialty crop soils are considered for the agricultural designation Prune agricultural areas have prime soils where agriculture or agriculturally related uses predominate. Within this prime agricultural azea, there may be pockets of lower quality agricultural soils as identifiied on the Canada Land Inventory mapping. These Pockets are included within the prime ag~ticultural designation as part of the principle of creating large contiguous areas. Using the same principle, there will probably be small pockets of Clara 1 to 3 agricultural soils that are within the Rural designation Again, those pockets are excluded from the primc agricultural designation as part of the principle of identifyittg only lazgc contiguous agricultural areas. • Prime Agricultural Area identified should generally be greattr than 250 hectares. Areas considered to be identified Rural should also be generally larger than 250 hectares. The boundary is beat if it follows a feature that is easily identifiable by all. Natural Physical features such as significant watercourses, environmental or wetland areas are ideal Man made physical features such as roads or railways are also very suitable. The trapping should avid; if at afl possible, a line that meanders across the middle of a property or even a concession Thin will only lead to confusion if the precise location becomes an issue. A high degree of fragmentation is indicative of a larger number of non-farm uses and is loss desirable of maintaining any agricultvral use. A low degree of fragmentation is representative of largo farm parcel sins which assist in maintaining the flembility to accommodate a wide variety of agricultural uses. A high degree of agricultural ]and within the unit provides an indication of the unib ability to sustain farm operations. Comeraeiy, an area that has a Iower amount of land is agriculture indicates rho lands are leas attractive for agticutturc. Lands that have been used for apiculture in the past may be considered to be in agricultural use. We have conducted a review of the larger area sturounding the proposed So1f curare tLaing the above parameters. The area considered is within 1 kilometer of the subject • lands with Highway 11 as the north boundary: Toombs Consulting. 1 S Welker Sree~ Lindsay, Chrtaao K9V 578 let 705-32x0184 Fax 705-32x.0512 06!09/1999 16:17 705-324-0512 TOOMBS CONSULTING PAGE 05 . 4 Lots 6 to 11, East half of Concession 1 Lots 6 to i 1, Concession Z Lots 23 to 26, Range 2 Lots 21 to 26, Weat hall of Concession 3 Soils The 1:50,000 tnaPpiag indicates that only Clara 1 to 4 soils are found within 1 kilometer of the site. There is one small unit of Class 4 soils to the east ,the other Class 4 soils are complexed with Claaa i soils over a larger area. Accatdutg to the trap, Class 1 to 3 soils prodorninatr within the study area. Fragntemation The 1994 asaeasmetrt mapping was reviewed. In this area, the original 100 acre lots or multiples of them prevail over much of the area. Many of these parcels have had a small midential lot removed but the average aiu has remained large. The lands adjacent to Highway 11 have ban iiagrnentcd with a tnrmber of hig~iway commercial uses, but even here, the non-developed laztds are still uaod for agricultural pur'poses• The total study area is approximately 2700 acres. 'There are 76 parcels within this area. Parcels of SO acres and larger encompass 2400 acres o[ 85% of the area. Thin few . number of parcels indicates a low amouat of fiagrttentation, which >, a very Positive factor for agricultursl use. Land Ia Agricultural Use There arc a number of highway commercial uses that front on Highway 11. There are also 15 rural residential lots scattered throughout the at+ca. The remaining land uses art agrictilttire and wooded areas. From the anphoto, there are approximately 82S wooded acres and 25 acres used for hig3rway commercial purposes. 'The remainder in is agricultural use. Size The existing agrictthurat designation mceta the parameter of delineating large contiguous blocks of of least 250 hectares for agricultural proposes. There arc not enough non-farm uses of poor soils to create a rural designation within this study area. CONCLUSIONS 1. Half of the subject site has been classed as prune agricultural soils. The poorest soils are concentrated oa the north portion of the site. 2. Permitting the golf worse will conflict with MDS requirements of the barn in lot 10, Concession i. The golf course is a Type `B' land use and requires a separation distance of LJ Toombs Consalting, IS Walker Street, Lindsay, Ontano K9V SZ8 Tel70S-3240184 Fex 705-323-051 Z 06/09/1999 16:17 • 705-324-0512 TOOMSS CONSULTING 300 tttetera from rho barn and 326 meters from a mantas storage. 'This arc will intrude 230 meters into the subject lands. 3. Active agricultural uses abut the subject lands to the west, south and oast. 4. The mapping attachai to the MillaPlan report dclineaiea only the wooded areas. 1n our opinion, this suggosted Rtual designation does trot meet the parameters of identifying agtieultvtal and rural areas for official plan purposes. PAGE bb 5. According to the i;5O,OO0 Canada Iaad Inventory mapping, Class 1 to 3 soils predominate within a i kilometer distance of the proposal 6. Wititin the study area, large farmed garcola preciotttiaate. Parcels of 50 acres and larger encompass 2400 acres or 83% of the area. These larger Parcels indicates a low amoutn of ¢agrnenta2ion, which is a very positive factor far agricultural use. Then arc a number of higjtway commercial uses that front on Fiighwayaad2 uses are an also 15 Huai residential lots scattered tluoughout the area. The remaining agriculture and wooded areas. Agricntturat uses predominate within the area. 8. The ezistittg agticuhural designation of rho Oro-Medante Oifrcial Plan meets the parameter of delincatittg large contiguous blocks of at least 250 hectares for agxicuhut~al proPoses• There are not enough areas of poor roils, ttoa-farm urea or fragmentation to create a Rural designation within thin study area 9. Permitting the golf course does not comply with policies that seek to preserve agricultural Land, protect existing agricultural uses from Wort-cgntpanble usos and meet MDS scpamtian distances. Toombs Conaulling, IS Walker Sttee~ i,ssidsay, Cntano K9V SZS Tel'705-324-0184 Fax 703-324A312 • Mi1lsPlan Consulting Services Box 207, 22 Church Street S., A~LISTON, Ontario, L9R 1V5 (705) 435-b267 Fax: 435-1037 Township of Oro-Medonte P. O. Box 100 0920 STATION, Ontario LOL 2X0 Attention: Andrea Leigh, Planner ~~~. :.. . May,, 6, 1999 ~= ;`, r ~\i° Dear Andrea: Subject: HanninentDodson proposed Golf Gonrse Thank you for taking the time on Monday to meet with us briefly . regarding the above noted. I confirm that Ms. Agar's report was delivered to you at that time. As promised, I have prepared additional information on the surrounding area, which demonstrates that the subject lands are, in fact, a part of a larger continuum of rural, non-farm lands and land uses, as shown on the attached compilation OBM base map. This information was compiled using 1971, 1978, and 1989 aerial photography, OBM topographic mapping, Agricultural Land capability classification maps as well as a windshield reconnaissance survey of the area. I have not, however, conducted the kind of comprehensive on-site field testing on these adjacent lands which Bev Agar has carried out for the subject lands. Consequently, this information is somewhat more subjective, but I have erred on the side of extreme caution in making the determination of what is "rural", and what is not. The determination of "rural" as opposed to "agricultural" was based on the following parametres: 1. Soil classification and type/severity of limitations 2. Pasttpresent agricultural use, or lack of use. 3. The presence of forest cover or successional growth 4. The length and steepness of slopes 5. The presence of wet conditions, wetlands and proximity • to watercourses 6. The size and configuration of individual land parcels 7. Established non-farm land uses/structures • I have concluded that the area of some 150 ha. shown in cross hatching on the attached map is, without a doubt, an area which is predominately non-farm, rural land. I have also identified three other adjacent areas which have similar characteristics and a combination of the above noted features which would appear to also indicate that they are also predominantly "rural" in nature, as follows: North - Gasoline alley area to Shanty Bay Golf Course West - Willow Creek to City of Barrie Limits South - Swamplands and Ridges Note that all of these areas are separated by very narrow bands of marginal agricultural lands. They are, as a result, loosely interconnected, at Highway 11 to the north, and along Willow Creek to the west and south-east. To the north, the commercial strip provided the separation, which to the west and south east, the intervening lands are pasturelands. I have shown the interconnections in dashed lines. I have not taken the time to delineate these other areas in their entirety, but have shown only the limits of these similar areas • adjacent to the subject lands and "rural" area. Obviously, we would not propose to include all of these other areas within our Official Plan amendment to redesignate the area of which the subject lands are an integral part, to "Rural". However, we would be supportive if the Township wished to deal with these other areas also. The presence of at least four such areas in Township does, however, underscore the need appropriateness of the "Agricultural" desig Plan for this corner of Oro-Medonte, and to which will further refine the designations, actual site characteristics and land uses. this portion of the to further e$amine the Zation in the Official consider amendments in recognition of We hope that you and Planning Committee will agree that this information, and the more detailed and comprehensive site investigations carried out by Ms. Agar on the subject lands are sufficient to warrant consideration of an application for an amendment to the Official Plan, and that the Committee will see fit to invite same to be submitted for your further consideration. Obviously, we will want to discuss what additional and other supporting information the Township will want to see in order that the application can be deemed to be complete (ie. Environmental impact study, traffic analysis, etc.). • I have also plotted the 1.0 Iffn. buffer adjacent to the City of Barrie on this map, for your information. As you can see, the subject lands are well beyond this buffer area. • I confirm that we will be scheduled to meet again with Planning Committee on May 17th provided, of course, that the review of this information has been completed. I will await confirmation from you. In the meantime, if you have any concerns comments or questions please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. I trust that this is appropriate, and remain. Your s~very truly li Z~ Ron Mills, MillsPlan ENCLgSIIRE _'-; c . c . Don Hanninen Bruce Dodson Beverly M. Agar i (705) 322-1918 Agricultural Capability and Impact Study Part Lots 9 and 10, Concession 2 Former Township of Oro Township of Oro-Medonte AGAR 8~ Associates 2034 Flos Road 6 West R.R.#1, Phelpston, Ontario t.OL 2K0 fax (705) 322-0819 • e-mail bmagar@simcoe.net Agricultural Capability and Impact Study Page 1 Part Lots 9 and 10, Concession 2 Former Township of Oro Township of Oro-Medonte 1.0 Proposal The proposal is to develop a 175 acre property for an 18 hole golf course. The property is currently zoned and designated for agricultural purposes. To allow forthe proposed development, the proponents are required to address the impact of the proposed development on the agricultural capability of the subject property and surrounding lands. This study has been prepared to address these issues. 2.0 Subject Property As noted above, the subject property is an approximately 175 acre parcel located to the south of the Highway 11 corridor in the area known as "Gasoline Alley". The property contains some agricultural lands as well as wooded and wetland areas. A creek passes through the property. Using an electronic planimeter, there appears to be 76 acres on the subject property which have been cropped. The subject property is shown on the Canada Land Inventory at a scale of 1:50,000 as containing • a variety of soil types predominated by two soil units containing Classes 1, 2, 3 and 4 with fertility and topographical limitations. A detailed analysis was completed at a scale of 1:10,000 to more accurately determine the soil capabilities of the property. To complete this study, aerial photography (1:1,000 scale) and contour mapping (1:5,000 scale) were utilized to determine preliminary soil boundaries. A site inspection was completed to confirm accuracy of soil boundaries, slopes and other soil limitations including excessive moisture conditions. A hand clinometer was used to measure slopes. Soif profiles were determined using a dutch auger. The attached Detailed Soil Capability Map shows the distribution of soil types on the subject property. The following chart sets of the soil types and amounts of each type. An electronic planimeter was used to determine the acreage of each soil unit. The subject property contains to main soil limitations. These are topography and excessive wetnesslinundation. The slopes on the property are generally complex in nature with slopes less than 50 m in length. There are slopes greater than 24 % in the area shown as CLI Class 5T. The slopes in the CLI Class 4T area are between 9 and 16 percent. In each of the CLI Class 4T and 5T areas, there is evidence of both sheet and rill erosion. However, these limitations are not as significant as the topographical limitations. The CLI Class 3T slopes are in the 5 to 9 percent range and the CLI Class 2T soils are characterized by complex slopes of 2 to 5 percent. AGAR & Associates • Agricultural Capability and Impact Study Part Lots 9 and 10, Concession 2 Former Township of Oro • Township of Oro-Medonte Page 2 The CLI Class 3W, Class SW, Class 5WI and Class 7W relate to area of the subject property were there is poor and very poor drainage, flooding and standing water. These area are located along the creek and in the wetland located on the northern portion of the property. None of the CLI Class 3 soils are currently cultivatable. Amounts of CLI Class Soils on the Subject Property CLI Class Area acres High Capability Soils 1 5.4 2T 53 1 85.5 acres 3T 13.8 3Vy 13.2 4T 41.6 Low Capability Soils 5WI 30.4 5T 7,q 90.3 acres 5W 1.7 7W 9.2 Based on this analysis, there is more low capability soils on the subject property than high capability soils. While some of the poor capability soils are currently cultivated, these areas show evidence of both sheet and rill erosion. Continued cultivation will result in additional soil losses. 3.0 Surrounding Land Uses The subject property is located approximately 1 mile south of the Highway 11 corridor, directly. south of the area known as "Gasoline Alley". "Gasoline Alley" contains numerous non-farm uses including various gas station, restaurant establishment and various commercial operations. AGAR & Associates . Agricultural Capability and Impact Study Part Lots 9 and 10, Concession 2 Former Township of Oro Township of Oro-Medonte Page 3 The Canada Land Inventory shows the soils in the area south of Highway 11 is comprise of CSI Class 3 and 5 soils. The only active agricultural operation to the north of the subject property is a small, approximately 25 acre horse farm. Based on a housing capacity of 5 horses and a dry manure system, an MDS 1 requirement of 90 metres from the facility and 122 metres from the manure storage is required. The actual distance is greater than 200 metres. To the east of the subject property the (ands are generally wooded with limited agricultural activities until east of Concession Road 2. To the south of the subject property, an active agricultural operation. This subject property was previously part of this operation. There is a large bank bam on this property to the south. It is in very poorstructural condition and is only utilized for equipment storage. This structure is no longer capable of safely housing livestock. There is an additional smaller bank bam on the property which is also used for equipment storage however this structure is still reasonable capable of housing livestock. The proponents have reached an agreement with the landownerto replace this building with an equipment shed. South of this property is a large wetland area. • To the west of the subject property, there are two residences located at the comer of Concession Road 1 and Gore Road. There is an additional new residence being constructed on a 3 acre lot which was previously severed from the subject property. To the north of this corner is a set of farm buildings and someforage fields. The associated traditional bank barn appearsto be unused and is located greater than 300 metres from the subject property. To the south of these residences, there is a set of farm buildings. While the barn appearsto have housed dairy cattle in the past, it now appears to be vacant. The following assumptions have been used to calculate the Minimum Distance Separation 1 requirement. • Dairy cattle were housed in this facility. • The manure system was semi-solid. • 150 animals could be supported by the land base. Based on these assumptions, an MDS 1 of 300 metres from the facility and 326 metres from the manure storage is required. However under implementation guidelines #10 of the MDS 1, if there are four or more non-farm uses within the calculated distance, MDS 1 does not apply. There are at (east four non-farm residences within the 326 metre distance from the facility. These include the two residence located at the corner of Concession Road 1 and Gore Road, the new residence being built on a severed lot off the subject property and the Van Dam residence located to the south of the facility. • AGAR 8 Associates • Agricuiturai Capability and Impact Study Page 4 Part Lots 9 and 10, Concession 2 Former Township of Oro Township of Oro-Medonte Because of the configuration of roads in the area, the subject propefij is isolated from the major agricultural areas ofOro-Medonte. There is the limited access to Highway 11, and unopened road allowance to the east and south of the subject property. The majority of active agricultural land are located to the east and north of the subject property. 4.0 Conclusion It is our professional opinion that the proposed development of the subject property will not adversely impact agriculture. The subject property contains more low capability agricultural soils than high capability soils. Some of the (ands that are currently cultivated have severe topographical limitations which have resulted in soil erosion. The general area around the subject property is rural in nature and because of the nature of the soil types and road configuration is isolated from the main agricultural areas of Oro-Medonte Township. There are minimal active agricultural uses to the north of the subject property between it and the Highway 11 corridor. There are no conflicts with the Minimum Distance Separation 1 requirements from existing bam to the east. An agreement has been reached with the land owner to the south to replace the existing small bank bam. Respectfully submi ~~~ ~Beverl M. Agar Agar Assocates • AGAR 8~ Associates Detailed Soil Capability Map r AGAR and Associates 2034 Flos Road Six West, R.R. #1 Phelpston, Ontario, Canada LOL 2K0 (705)322-1918 scale ~:~o,ooo Fax (705)322-0819 N LEGEND Soil Capabii'rhr 1 - No signficant limitations 2 -Moderate limitations 3 -Moderately severe limitations 4,5,6,7 -Severe limitations for agriculture O -Organic sons Limitinsr Factors I - Inundation T -Topography W - Excess Wetness _~'3~.. . PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE June 9, 1999 Pierre and Jean Chenevotot, P-92/99 Part of Lot 21, Concession 5 (Medonte) Proaosal The applicant has applied for a Temporary Use By-law to permit a Garden Suite (Granny Flat) on the subject property for a period of not more than 10 years. Official Plan -Agricultural Zoning By-law -Agricultural/Rural (A/RU) Zone Department Head Comments No Concerns. Simcoe County District Health Unit Approval Required. Planning Department Comments In 1995 the Planning Act was amended to permit a Garden Suite on a temporary basis for a period not to exceed ten years. A Garden Suite was defined in the Planning Act as "a one unit detached residential structure containing a bathroom and kitchen facilities that is ancillary to an existing residential structure that is designated to be portable." This section of the Planning Act was to be implemented through the Temporary Use provisions and through Council implementing a Temporary Use By-law. At that time a criteria for considering any Temporary Use By-law for a Garden Suite was established. A copy of this policy is attached for the Committee's reference. The intent of this policy is to ensure that the unit is temporary and it is therefore required to be connected to the existing servicing on the property and must utilize the existing driveway. To further ensure the unit is temporary, an agreement is to be registered on title, which requires the removal of the unit in ten years. When this agreement is executed by Council, securities are also required to be submitted to the Township to ensure removal of the unit. The amount of security would be determined by Council and incorporated into the agreement. • The applicant has indicated they can comply with the existing policy and that the unit will be connected to the existing services for the existing dwelling. Recommendation: It is recommended that Development Application P-92/99 proceed to a Public Meeting in accordance with the Planning Act for a Temporary Use By-law for a Garden Suite. • POLICY ON GARDEN Sti TTES (GRANNY FLATSI [n February of 1997 Council adopted a report of criteria required to permit a garden suite on properties within the Township of Oro-Medonte. Prior to a garden suite being constructed on any property a Temporary Use Zoning By-law Amendment is required to be processed through the Planning Department, a copy of the appiication is attached for completion. A "Garden Suite' is defined in the Planning Act as the following: ^ a one unit detached residential structure containing a bathroom and kitchen facilities that is ancillary to an existing residential structure and that is designed to be portable. This structure is permitted for a period of not more than 10 years. Further to this definition Council has adopted the following criteria in considering an Temporary Use By-law application: 1. A mobile home or trailer (as defined below) is not considered a "Garden Suite"; ?. The '`Garden Suite' must utilize all existing servicing available on the property including, but not limited to: hydro, well, and septic system; 3. The existing driveway to the main residential dwelling is to be utilized for access and • no new entrance will be permitted: 4. That the minimum Bross floor area is required to be 50 square metres 1538 square feet) and that maximum gross floor area is 85 square metres (915 square feet) provided that the `Garden Suite" is not more than 50% of the gross floor area of the main residential dwelling; 5. The Simcoe County District Health Unit or the Ministry of Environment and Energy must indicate, in writing, that they have no objection to the Temporary Use By-law; 6. That the applicant must enter into the appropriate agreement with the Municipality which shall be registered on title to ensure removal of the "Garden Suite"; 7. That a site plan be provided by the applicant and appended to the agreement noted above; 8. The "Garden Suite" is not transferable to any subsequent owner(s) and the owner applying for the Temporary Use By-law is responsible for removal of the ~~Garden Suite' prior to sale of the property; and 9. That securities in an amount deemed appropriate by Council are deposited with the Municipality for the term of the `Garden Suite". • a MOBII.E HO'VLE is defined as: "a home. movable and suitable for permanent or semi-permanent residence and not being less than 15 metres in length and 3 metres in width, and containing suitable sanitary and food preparation faciiities within the same. The unit remains a mobile home even though it may be jacked up and its running gears removed. This definition does not include manufactured buildings • for residential occupancy constructed in compliance with CAN/CSA-2240.2.1, "Structural Requirements for Mobile Homes", CAN/CSA-2240.8.1. "Light Duty • Windows", aad CANJCSA-2240.3.1, "Plumbing Requirements for Mobile Homes" if the building is constructed in sections not wider than 4.88 metres (16 feet), or CSA A-277 "Procedure for Certification of Factory-Built Houses".(ONTARIO BUILDING CODE SECTION 2.1.L4) a TRAILER is defined as: "any vehicle so constructed that it is suitable for being attached to a motor vehicle for the purposes of being drawn or propelled by the motor vehicle, notwithstanding that such vehicle is jacked up, but not including any vehicle unless it is used or intended for the short-tertn camping, living, steeping, or eating accommodation of persons therein, and shall be deemed to include a tent'. • • °XCERPT FROM THE ONTARIO Bi)Li DING CODE • L J Part 2 General Requirements (See Appendix A.} Section 2.1 Application 2.1.1. Buildings • 2.1.1.1. Parts i, 2, T and 12. Parts 1, 2, 7 and 12 apply to all buildings. • 2,1.1.2. Parts 3, 4, 5, and 6 (1) Except as provided in Article 2.1.1.5., Sentence 2.1.1.6.(1) and Subsection 2.1. an area 3, 4, 5, and 6 apply to all buildings occupying greater than ten square meters (108 ft2) and (a) used for (i) Group A, assembly occupancies, (ii) Group B, institut,onai occupancies, or (iii) Group F, Divisio handhazard industrial ~~ ft2 in buiidin area (b) exceeding 600 m (6460 ) 8 or exceeding 3 storeys in building height used for major occupancies classified as (i) Group C, residential occupancies, (ii) Group D, business and personal ser- vices occupancies, (iii) Group E, mercantile occupanties, or (iv) Group F, Division 2 and 3, medium and low hazard industrial occupancies. 2.1.1.3. Part9 ~ (i) Except as provided in Sentences 2.1.1.4.(2), 2.1.1.6.(1) and Article 2.1.1.5., Part 9 applies to buildings occupying an area greater than ten square metres (108 ftz) (a) of 3 storeys or less in building height, (b) having a building area not exceeding 600 m- (6460 ft~), and (c) used for: (i) Group C, residential occupancies. (ii) Group D, business and personal ser- vices occupancies, (iii) Group E, mercantile oaupancies, and (iv) Group F, Division 2 and 3, medium and Iona hazard industrial occupancies. 2.1.1.4. Site Assembled and Factory-BuiN Buildings (1) Except as provided in Sentence (2), and Article 2.1.1.7., this Code applies to the design and construction of site assembled buildings and manufac- tured buildings. (2) Except as provided in Sentence (3), a manufactured building intended for residential occupancy is deemed to comply with this Code if it is designed and constructed in compliance with (a) CAN/CSA-2240.2.1., ,.Structural Requirements for Mobile Homes", CAN/- CSA-2240.8.1•, "Light Duty Windows" andCANlCSA-2240.3.1., "Ptumbing Requirements for Mobile Homes", if the building is constructed in Sections not wider than 4.88 m (16 ft), or {b) CSA A-277 "Procedure for Ceriification of Factory-Built Houses". (3) The requirements of this Code shall apply to (a) building components designed and con- structed outside the place of manufac- ture, and (b) site installation of such buildings. (See Appendix A.) • O. Reg. i 60/93 Z~ • d•i•i.3.2. z'XC°_RPT rr^ROM THE ONTARIO BUILDING CODE sepazate tenure in the context of the Code. Similarly, e term suite is not normally applied in the context f buildings such as schools and hospitals, since the entire building is under a single tenure. A rented room in a nursing home could be considered as a suite if the room was under a separate tenure. A hos- pital bedroom on the other hand is not considered to be under a separate tenure, since the patient has little control of that space, even though he pays the hospital a per diem rate for the privilege of using the hospital facilities, which include the sleeping areas. For certain requirements in the Code the expression "room or suite" is used (e.g. trnvel distance). This means that the requirement applies within the rooms of suites as well as to the suite itself and to rooms that may be located outside the suite. In other places the expression "suite, and morns not located within a suite" is used (e. g. for the installation of smoke and heat detectors). This means that the requirement applies to individual suites as defined, but not to each room within the suite. The rooms "not within a suite" would include common laundry rooms, common reaeaHonal rooms and service rooms, that are not considered as tenant occupied space. deemed to comply with the Code. Building compo- nents designed and constructed outside the place of manufacture (e.g. masonry chimneys, basement stairs, foundations, etc.) must conform to the requirements of the Code. The Code also applies to the site installation of manufactured buildings in terms of tie-down, spatial separation, grading, plumbing connections to street services, etc. A•2.1.3.1. Buildings Divided by Firewalls. This concept relates to the provisions directly regu- lated by this Code and does not apply to electrical service entrance requirements which aze regulated by other documents. A•2.1.3.2.(1 i Buildings on Sloping Sltes. This relaxation applies to the determination of build- ingheight only. All other requirements continue to apply as appropriate. A•2.3.1.1.(3) Requirement far an Architect. This Sentence permits an exception to the requirement for an architect in any building in Table 2.3.1.A. This exception applies only where the design for the interior space and related exterior ele- ments comply with the Code. A•2 Limit on Appiicatlon. The provisions in this Code are intended to provide a minimum cceptable level of public safety and building integ- They aze not intended to be applied to volun- installations unless specified in the Code. For example, a firewall installed for insurance pur- poses need not comply with the requirements in Subsection 3.1.8. unless it is used as a means to create 2 buildings for the purposes of other Code requirements. Similarly, it is not intended that vol- untary standpipe and sprinkler installations comply with the relevant requirements in Subsection 3.2.5. Voluntary installations should not detrimentally affect features required by the Code. A•2.1.1.4. Factory•Built Buildings. Manufactured buildings intended for residential occupancy must comply with all appropriate Code requirements. Only those building components that are designed and constructed in manufacturing plants in accordance with the standards (CSA 7240.2.1., CSA 2240.8.1. and CSA A-27~ aze A•2 A-2.4.6.1. As Constructed Pions. The intent of the provision for as constructed plans is to pro- vide the municipality with authority to ask for infor- mation that is necessary for the enforcement of the Act and the Building Code. The intent of the provi- sion is not to duplicate the permit approval process and require similaz information to be filed upon completion of the project. Similarly, the provision is not intended to require information and documenta- tion beyond those that are normally generated in the building permit approval process. A•2.5.1.1. Climatic Oata. Data for municipali- ties not listed in Table 2.S.1.A. may be obtained by writing to: Head, Energy and Industrial Application Section, Canadian Climate Service, Environment Canada, 4905 Duffenn Street, Downsview, Ontario M3H ST4. The 2'!z per cent values shown in Table 2.S.I.A. aze the least restrictive temperatures that can be used. If a designer chooses to use the 1 per cent values shown in Table 2.S.I.A., they would be in excess of • Cerrtification of Factory Built Houses in the latest amendment to the Ontario Building Code (O.Reg.t 74/89) in article 2.7.7.4.(2) buildings which are manu- taetured at an off-site location are exempt from compliance • with the preacriptfve design requirements of Part 9 of the Code. If they ere designed and constucted to comply with CSA A-2]7 'Procedure for Certification of Factory-Buiit Houses". Otherwise. such manufactured buildings have 1o be designed and constructed to the specific prescriptive design require' manta of Part 9 of the Code. A similar exemption exists in the case of Mobile Homes which must be designed and con- structed to the requirements of CSA 2240.2.7. "Structural Requirements for Mobile Homes". Under the requirements of thane standards the CSA provides forthe certification and auditing of the manufacturers quality program and provides Inspection end certdication of the products buiiL Manufacturers building homes for ages In Ontario are required to build to the NBC and any amendments adopted by Ontado (aa contained in the OMarfo Building Code), and they commit themselves by stating in their Duality Program Manual (ea required In A277), the codes and standards their products will conform to, including the Plumbing Code IO.Reg.875/84 as amended) and the Canadian Electrical Code Part 1, 1985 S Ontario Supplements. The product certrfication must contain the following In- formation on the specification sheets inside each house: (7) manufacturers name and address (2) model (3) serial number (4) year of manufacture t5) ground snow load and roof design load I6) thermal resistance of in of eniergy used) (8) colmPlete }actory installed in the unit (type electrical rating of circuitry. The manufacturer must also provide within each home printed set-up instructions including (a) anchorage and pier blocking or foundation ib) details and installation of items on site. connections to servicensta led items antl (d) theiowners~ (c) the extent of factory manual The CSA certification of the unit means that the factory•built • portion of the house including the plumbing antl electrical systems has been designed antl built to the above standards and is in compliance with the Code. That portion of the house to be completed on site including the foundation and the hook-up services is sublect to inspec• ;ion by the building official. Manufacturers should be able to supply drawings and other information such as an msoection check list antl test racortls for the house when requested by the building or plumbing • • • Township of Oro-Medonte. PO Box 100. Oro, Ontario. LOL 2X0 Development Application Application No. P- ~ L ~ q9 [ ] Application to amend the Officiai Plan of the Township [ ] Application to amend the Comprehensive Zoning By-law [ J Appiicadon to consider a Dmfr Plan of Subdivision [ YJ Other, please specify ~~1~~ ~ 7 K S ~ LWe hereby apply, as specified above, to the Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte. It h expressly understood that this application is in zegazd only to the lands as hereinafter described, and is made pursuant to the provisions of'Ihe Planning Act. R.S.O., 1990. All costs associated with the application shall be paid az per the Tariff of Fees By-law including all costs associated with an appeal of the application to the Ontario Municipal Boazd UWe enclose herewith application and processing fees m the amomt of $2450.00 for an amendmrn[ to the OfScial Plan ($1200.00 is a refundable deposi[ in accordance with the Tariff of Fees By-law). UWe enclose herewith application and processing fees N the amount of $2450.00 for an amendment to the Comprehensive Zoning By-law ($1200.00 is a refundable deposit ¢t accordance with the Tariff of Fees By-law). LWe enclose herewith application and processing Fees m the amour[ of 8500.00 (100 lots or less); 8 7_ 5, 0.00 (t01 to 1991ots); or 9 Oj 00.00 (2001ots or more) far a draft Plan of Subdivision ($5500.00 is a refundabte deposit in accordance with the Tariff of Fees By-law). DATED AT THE 'TOW .~slYYP OF SRO -f-(EiYbr-f,~t TAE Cc)KN7~/ OF SIn ~E THIS ~ 3 DAY OF r7f~7 199 ~ . y v l Signature ofAppiican[or Au ~ Ag (To be wimesaed by a Commissioner) Signature of Cotrunissionez To be completed by the Annlicant or Authorized Agent (Please print or tvoe 1. Name of Applicant ~(~,(~(Z~ a- J~~ ~'/{-[/J~pVUI~j Fu1lMailingAddress ~y `02 ~' L///~ ~ /~/, /t ~ r J ll 1 C jZ;,12 {./~ N fj-/2l~cii,{/c ON% _ Telephone Number 7C,5' ~~J~ 00.~~ ~^~ ~ °`'' l ~ 2. Name of Applicant's Agent Fuil Mailing Address Telephone Number :VOTE: O~ A[I correspondence and communications will be directed to the Applicant's Ageni unless otherwise specified S f °l -CPS 3 -- ~ O (~ ~ /7d~rE2 S f~tt~ N~ ~' Township of Oro-Medonte. PO Box 100, Oro, Ontario, LOL 2,Y0 Development Application • Application No. P- 3. Full legal description of the property which is the subject of this Application including the name of the former Municipality in which it is located, e.g. Lot 1, Concession 1, Township of Orillia, and, if larown, the azea of the sand covered by the proposed amendment. `CwS~ f1FD0~'f"E ~au~y of s//7coF Cyr-)-.S~ To be answered by the Aonlicant /Please print or tune) 1.1 Are you the registered owner of the subject lands? Yes V No_ 1.2 Do you act on behalf of the registered owner? Yes_ No_ 2.1 Do you have an option to purchase the subject lands? Yes_ No_ 2.2 If so, what is the expiry date of the Option? 2.3 Have you an offer to Purchase or Agreement of Sale in respect of the subject Lands, or any portion thereof with the Registered Owner? Yes_ No_ 2.4 What is the expiry date of any Offer or Agreement mentioned in 4.2.3? • 2.5 Is the above noted Option, Offer or Agreement conditional on the success or failure of this Application? Yes No 5. Present Official Plan designation(s) ~, ~ : c,... «u.c~~ 6. Present Zone classification(s) Q4~~ ~,~1~,,<i ~2„~,a( 7. Present Use of subject lands ~z~ , ~c-~ ~: ct~ 8. Proposed use of subject lands ~es:cAa,,;~~a.~ ~ c--«wNU ~ -~c.'~~ 9. Official Plan designation required 10. Zone Classification required 1 I. Applicant's reason, argument and/orjustification for requiring the proposed Amendment(s) (attach a supplementary schedule if necessary). My Mo~f~~2 curry ~~(rz~Ni `~.y LivrS~ I~ ~-11'f-(~ ~lDC~ ~~~/G 1S /jGJNG. /~ N P7 ~>~S {'f ~fl-L7~f ~l-~/-~ L,~lv N G-ES ~-- LSI-~ ES Tc~ ~r v~ oN cu ~ ~°~ea~~,p~ ~ rJ i~t ~ P~ o Poses/ GR~N~' Y ~t-~T SO S/t~ U~`i~~ ~~ NtGh-R CIS' AND ldE C f1-r~ !?~ L P I t~ rZ 7Z ~ i / r= flS /D/o ~ P~rN /~m~T~ y r~ S ~o s-S I s t~ . Township of Oro-Medonte, PO Box 100, Oro, Ontario, LOL 2X0 Development Application • Application No. P- 12. Supplementary and supporting material to be submitted by the Applicant: All information as required under the Tovmship of Oro-Medonte Development Guidelines. Survey or sketch prepazed by an Ontario Land Surveyor showing: Appticant's/Owner's total holdings of land in the subject azea. [ J Land which is to be subject of the requested Amendment cleazly indicated thet~eon (in the case of au amendment, please provide ten (10) 11" X 17" copies of the site plan or boundary survey). [ ] The location, size and use of all existing buildings or structures on the subject lands and on immediately adjacent properties. All topogmphicai features shall also be shown. [ ] The location, width and names of all road allowance, rights-of--ways, streets or highways within or abutting the property, indicating whether they are public travelled roads, private roads, rights-of--way or unopened road allowances. 13. What other Provincial Ministries or other Agencies or individuals have been consulted with prior to the submission of this Application? (eg. Ministry of Municipal Affahs, School Boazds, District Health Unit, County Engineer, etc.) ~l ST)Z-ICI ft~~4-t,T-~ (-l~t.J J 14. Is the subject land or any land within 120 m (400 ft) of the subject land the subject of another Development Application made by the applicant for approval of an Official Plan amendment, a Zoning By-law amendment, a Plan of Subdivision, a Minor Vaziance, a Consent, or a Site Plan? Yes_ No / N t='T 'tz~ o u ie. Y-'t~ 0 w ~-G ~ 6-E If yes, please state which type of application, if known, the application number, and describe the lands which aze subject to this application. NOTE: Only fully completed applications accompanied by the necessary supporting materials will be processed The personal information on this form is being collected pursuant to the Planning Act, RS.O., 1990, cP.13 and will be used in relation to the processing of this Developmeat Application. If you have any questions, please ask at the Oro-Medonte Township OfJFces. -~.J _ _ LOT 22, _CO_N. _5 _ UNE BETWEEN LOTS 27 aN0 22 Y~ ~~~ `A, !9 1 (1390) V~ `~ ~~ ~~ ~• y `~ y~~ V~ ~G G~ BEARINGS ARE ASiRONOYiC ANp ARE REFERRCD TO THE EASTERLY IIbT Of LOT 21, CONCESSION S AS SHOwN ON PUN 31R-0423. HAVINp A BFARIN6 Of N 3P tt' 3P w. sia ~ (1390) iI ~I ~ T a gI Z YY Q SIB -, (1390) ~ o° 0 N Z O N N W v z o v ss.DD• a DRRELD Z w6tl s. W ( Y 33.t• < W i I ~ G W ~ r r 4I r W z m u I g 19 j-- N59'40'S0"E- (PLAN 6 MEAS) 210.00' -{- (650) ~ 19 I ~+ (1390) .. ~m a f W IE CEND ' INST. No. 350635 '" - ° " >: of b2: a Nl w +JO zw .j N~ 4 W K S.E. ~^RNER V LDT 2i; CON_5 ROAD ALLOWANCE BEPFNEEI: LOTS 518 20 AND 21 187 ~ ---- DENOTES VONUYENT FOUND l_. ---- OENOiFS VONUVEM PLAMTCD '8-----OENOTE3 A S0. IRON BAR SIB---- OEHOI[S A 50. SimDAPp IRON BAR SSIB--- pFNOTEI • 40. SNORT SLNDARO IRON BAR 650--- OENOTFS C. P. O'DAEE, O.L4. tSiO---DENOTES P. R. RRCNEH. O.LS. PUH--NENOTES PLW SiR-]@S SURVEYOR'S CERTI FICA7E i aRRFr THAr: SHE f2l- SURV[Y REPRESEHiED RY THIS • PLAX wAS COYPLCTED OX 1HC 291X OAT OE APR14 tvvD. ~~ / C ~ ~'~] PAUL R. O4TA R10 LA. BUILDING LOCATION SURVEY OF PART OF LOT 21, CONCESSION 5 TOWNSHIP OF MEDONTE COUNTY OF SIMCOE SCALE: 1 INCH = 50 FEET PAUL R. KITCHEN SURVEYING LTD. 7990 ~ o• 6 b 1 'Y 6 N59'40'S OT ! 'J .. C iLl ~l] -c,L M 1- PART 1 ,_ PLAN S1R-7423 AREA = 0.964 Ac-~~--~+I z~ J U~I INST. No. f065598~~ ~~ J PAUL R. KITCHEN SURVEYING li0 PAUL R. KITCHEN SURVEYING LTD. ~~ ONTARIO LAND SURVEYORS it CANADA LANDS SURVEYORS , !NCH ~ SO FEET ( JULY SS. 19°0 ( NOMHPOINi pRLRINC CO. StJ 210.00' - E 9°ceo~R--- u.sr ]9 PETER 57. N. ORILLIA, ON iAR10 705-315-7665 9RACE9RIDGE 705-645-/19t W V Z a 0 J Q Q a 0 V - 5 - 11 N 4 N N N X W \~-\ /~^' v )n V , vrU m 0 r _~ ~ Y ~ ~ C rn ~~ ~(~\ 1 ' 11'- ~1 PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE June 9, 1999 Beverley Plummer, P-91/99 South Part of Lot 12, Concession 2 (Oro) Proposal The applicant has applied for a Temporary Use By-law to permit the storage and use of the property for one horse for a period of three years with the potential of an additional three year period. Official Plan -Agricultural Zoning By-law -Rural Residential Two (RUR2) Zone Department Head Comments No Concerns. Planning Department Comments The subject property is located within surrounded by agricultural properties. severed lot off a farm parcel. i cluster of residential properties which are The subject property was in fact a The property is 2.12 acres in size and it is evident on the survey provided by the applicant (attached) that the area proposed to be used for a horse paddock is at the north end of the property which is the furthest portion of the property from the remainder of the residential cluster. A Temporary Use By-law is permitted in accordance with the Planning Act and the Township's Official Plan; these uses may not conform to the Official Plan. These temporary uses are permitted for a specific period of time of up to three years in situations where it is not appropriate to permit the use on a permanent basis. With Temporary Use By-laws once the time period has lapsed the use must cease or it will be deemed to contravene the Zoning By-law. The Official Plan stipulates six criteria which the Township should be satisfied about prior to giving favorable consideration to a Temporary Use By-law: a) The proposed use shall be of a temporary nature and shall not entail any major construction or investment on the part of the owner so that the owner will not experience undue hardship in reverting to the original use upon the termination of the temporary use; b) The proposed use shall be compatible with adjacent land uses and the character of the surrounding neighbourhood; c) The proposed use shall not require the extension or expansion of existing municipal services; d) The proposed use shall not create any traffic circulation problems within the area nor shall it adversely affect the volume and/or type of traffic serviced by the area's roads; e) Parking facilities required by the proposed use shall be provided entirely on-site; and, f) The proposed use shall generally be beneficial to the neighbourhood or the community as a whole. The Committee should determine that subsection (a) is satisfied and discuss with the applicant the details of the horse paddock she is looking at constructing to • determine that the structure/shelter is temporary and will not be a financial hardship for the applicant to remove once the Temporary Use By-law lapses. The proposed use for the keeping of one horse would be in keeping with the surrounding area which is predominantly agriculturaUrural. The proposed use will not require the extension of any municipal services nor will it cause any additional traffic concerns. The keeping of the one horse will not require additional parking facilities as the intended use is by the applicant's daughter who currently resides on the property. The keeping of one horse on the subject property for a period of three years would not appear to impact on the neighbourhood. Recommendation: It is recommended that Development Application P-91/99 proceed to a Public Meeting in accordance with the Planning Act for a Temporary Use By-law to permit the keeping of one horse. Township of Oro-Medonre. PO Box 100, Oro. Ontario. LOL ZYO Development Application C Application No. P- °,I j?-" [ ] Application to amend the Official Ptan of the Township 2 i ~ - c^ i ~ 1. ~ [ ] Application to amend the Comprehensive Zoning By-law [ j Application to consider a Drafr Ptan of Subdivision Other, Please specify ~~'-rte! C'~ L~.~ •~ irMA rz-. n_-. s~sF lira-.r I/We hereby apply, as specifed above, to the Corporation of the Towruhip of Oro-Medonte. I[ is expressly understood that this application is m regazd only to the lands as hereinafret described and is made pursuant to the provisions of'Ihe Plannine Act. R.S.O., 1990. All cosy associated with the application shall be paid as per the Tariff of Fees By-law including atl costs associated with an appeal of [he application m the Ontario Municipal Boazd 1/We enclose herewith application and processing fees in the amount of 52450.00 for an amendment to the Official Plan ($1200.00 is a refundable deposit in accordance with the Tariff of Fees By-law). I/V/e enclose herewiOr applcadon and processing fees in the amount of 52450.00 for an amendment to Ore Comprehensive Zoning By-law ($ t200.00 is a refundable deposit in accordance with the Tariff of Fees By-law). I/We enclose herewith application and processin¢ fees m the amount of 8.500.00 (1001ots or less); ' 8 7,~ 50.00 (101 to 199 lots); or 9,000.00 (200 lots or more) for a drafr Plano[ Subdivision ($5500.00 is a refundable deposit in accordance with the Tariff of Fees By-taw). • 1 J DATED AT TAE i--. u.utip OF -P--+-`^rn-i,~F _LN*'pgE C~/_w',i OF s~Mro~ _ TFIIS DAY OF e. ~ ~- 199 7 Lam/ ~Ltm.~=.-c-, ~ Signature of Applicant or Authorized Agent (To be witnessed by a Commissioner) Siettature of Cartmrissioner - To be comnieted by the Aonlicant or Authorized Agent (Please orint or twe I. Name of Applicant ~'~S ~ ~',_ ),= i ~/ -1 ~1) t)I rr t~ Full Mailing Address 1~' ~ ; I !/c ~ n 11 ~ ~ % NA/~ lI/ ~ Y ~// /Cti 2 i Telephone Number ~'~ ~ - / i) rj" 7 2. Name of Applicants Agen[ ~ L•' (~ ~ N ~ / /.-' i= ~-° ~ Full Mailing Address ' h/? j r I N/ r,, / Telephone Number j „ -? ~ ~ f/ , j :VOTE: .Al[ correspondence and communications will be directed to the Applicant's Agent unless otherwise specifed Township ojOro-Medonte. PO Bax 100. Oro, Ontario. LOL ZYO Development Application • !+pplication No. P- 3. Full legal description of the property which is the subject of this Application including [he name of the former Municipality in which it is located, e.g. Lot 1, Concession t. Township of Orillia, and, if (mown, the area of the land covered by [he proposed amenament. _ C %v `~ ~ v / U ~ 1, i /< / ~C : -' Vii' To be answered by the Aonlicant (Please orint or tvoe) r 4. 1.1 Are you the registered owner of the subject lands? Yes I!~ No 1.2 Do you act on behalf of the registered owner? Yes_ No_ 2.1 Do you have an option to purchase the subject lands? Yes_ No 2.2 If so, what is the expiry date of the Option? 2.3 Have you an offer to Purchase or Agreemen[ of Sale in respect of the subject lands, or any portion thereof with the Registered Owner? Yes No 2.4 What is the expiry' date of any Offer or Agreement mentioned in 4.2.3? 2.5 Is the above noted Option, Offer or Agreement conditional on the success or failure of this • Application? Yes_ No_ 5. Present Official Plan designation(s) ,_ z, ., .,, -_, oh -_ 6. '' Present Zone classification(s) ~` 2dt~:/ ~ /~~iliry[ , 7. Present Use of subject lands : Cc/'/ ~/ c ! U , i1J0 i G! S ~ U 8. Proposed use of subject lands H U /: 5 ~ ~ ~ ~.y l ~ /-{ 9. Official Plan designation required ~, , ,., ,,_ F 10. Zone Classification required ~.~c~ _~GG~' ~ ~;..t,Rl,~7 ~sf 1 I. Applicant's reason, argument andlor justification for requiring the proposed Amendment(s) (attach a supplementary schedule if necessary). Tc' Vic' u5F~9 />n~~J vr~~/q /~ft[=i~ rv=EVS e 'n1dt~[[-U ~uA }fN~iNH ~~tl/- 1~til5r r}% /f!n'c' Wcv/C> r/Y>~>e'c= SH= ,~ 7-f/15 Tai=; 1"rl~ l-'/~rc~ ,9w,; i,~~,~a/,~ ~/~~t/'tz- T~s~= iN ~. t~~l/v ~A7i~ <n~ ~= "'~~F ~ciTc~'v ~pJ''~1'~winrl~,- , Township oJOro-Medante. PO Box 100, Oro. Ontario. LOL LYO Development Application • Application No. P- 12. Supplementary and supporting material to be submitted by the Applicant. All information as required under the Township of Oro iMedonte Development Guidelines. Survey or sketch prepazed by an Ontario Land Surveyor showing: [.T Applicant's/Owner's total holdings of land in the subject area. [ ] Land which is to be subject of the requested Amendment deaziy indicated thereon (in the case of au amendment, please provide ten (10) II" X 17" copies of the site plan or boundary survey). [~ The location, size and use of all existing buildings or structures on the subject lands and on immediately adjacent properties. All topographical features shall also be shown. [t}~ The location, width and names of alt road allowance, rights-of--ways, streets or highways within or abutting the property, indicating whether they aze public travelled roads, private roads, rights-of--way or unopened road allowances. • 13. What other Provincial Ministries or other Agencies or individuals have been consulted with prior to the submission of this Application? leg. Ministry of Municipal Affairs, School Boazds, District Health Unit, County Engineer, e[c.) i ^iM 14. Is the subject land or any land within 120 m (400 ft) of the subject land the subject of another Development Application made by the applicant for approval of an Official Plan amendment, a Zoning By-law amendment, a Plan of Subdivision, a Minor Variance, a Consent, or a Site Plan? Yes_ No_ j/ If yes, please state which type of application, if known, the application number, and describe the lands which are subject to this application. ;VOTE: Only fully completed applications accompanied by the necessary supporting materials will be processed The personal information on this form is being collected pursuant to the Planning Act, R.S.O., 1990, c.P.13 and will be used in relation to the processing of this Development Application. If you have any questions, please ask at the Oro-Medonte Township Offices. 11 7 / v~~ i ~ /l .F t\1! ~ \ t #~ t \ \ `y~ i ;~ i, ~~~ 1 1 /" (~% .IIA~ ~_ --- ---In•HI x..«.tGWGx T an,««: «I OV avz 1 tC - cw I w I , i~ t t ,~: ^,, .sz; ' ~~ R si'x' uat po~GW e4d t ' INIITYO ALplc 1 .GI'G! 1 1 :~ i t t t ~ N ISi ~wiix[ 003 ~ivwx ,,.. a~ tlllli.tG SS aY« 8 _ ~ 6 F •"s ~ i ~~ T `t_ IT ~In .ooccl F 11 .$ .«.zc.«x n~~~=~ c i ~ 9 ^R n 1 _ eoe . _ '-~ ~ 's F- $ 8 ~' r nl d~~ ~'I ~ UI a7! ,r~ IR = ~, b~il5- N3 ;~ ~ as __ Id ~„ -. ?~ ~ ~~ N~ ~~ a =e-- ,~Wlxn.a lOXxx ~ ua.aos¢ ul.za uc vwmv -`t-mrln.«'cm ~ul.m'ool mlersa nn,oo~us Inl.n~s ]ax«GUx uu n.«.ac.«x ~ _ti I~ ~{ az~~d~ t]"J`Y ~ S^JOit;tid?NG~~ ;J33M138•^e°e 7 iJ`JM.ISI-lt' t]`YG~`1 p` ~7Nk(y/~7 \J ~J i ~! .! J ~~ i \J \,~t ~~ y~~50RVEYpR ' 0 6S ~ o Y Off' ~' b~00Ytl8 Pa 4p Q y 0 ~ ~ u~~l~ 'Q1 (Y ' '~' ~(JZHV ~ d gt WO N~ ~'~ wF W31 @ WGO gr ~~ ~~ o~N :~O oa3`~n a v "~ aw t- G~ zi J~ zOm fi-G..-.. L v o~~~a^ ~o nvnnw =0 ti ~ o ~~ mo ~40 m n m~ V)w z of F H ~9 • # ~&zFG -N N O E F ~ ~n'~O T _ 1.~ ot~~ u 7 3.z ~ ~a ~ Q Q ~>« p xw w= Og 7~dwn Or W ~~ J <4.«0 vG~ y v vi j~ !- w V '' pe ~ N 4 a F~ S F Q V ~ N 3 a ';~v' yr+ G O ~ da~?~w 9~wx~"w~ HaF ~"A ~~ o.: '= O a~ O O W 2 w K N m 2 S V LL_ h {~ In pl N ~ ~/' « Z M1 Q ~ tp >: a W ~yat ~ w w W Z ~ ~;. O ~di.ry.C ~ m tixFvmz'o o t"p,a o "gd w SF~^ so6^i ;::`G O di y~ °o ~Oaaa~a~ vi_Pi~ W >d~ ~ ~Z rc~C.~'' # ~Q-G~~ V C O-~ !f G- 3 Z~ W W q D Y E ~ B g W W 5 ~ O 4 J C ..0- 60 .0 O O U o u~ a ~ a J ~, \~ U a n t m m~ ~ m ~~ o 0 o cc A «» fc» tt>f l