Loading...
07 13 2006 C of A Agenda Committee of Adiustment AQenda Thursdav Julv 13, 2006, 9:30 a.m. 1. Communications and Correspondence 2. Disclosure of Pecuniary Interest 3. Hearings: 9:30 2006-8-14 Rosetta & Lester Parry Conc. 3, Part Lot 8 (Oro) 2072 Line 3 North 9:40 2006-A-20 Margaret Phillips Conc. 12, Plan 952, Lot 63 (Oro) 2261 Lakeshore Road East 9:50 2006-8-16 John & Dorothy Howard (Estate) Conc. 10, East Part Lot 7, West Part Lot 6 (Medonte) 4182 Line 10 North 10:00 2006-A-19 Stephen S1. Onge & Pauline Normand S1. Onge Conc. 2, Part Lots 42 & 43 (Medonte 4. Decisions 5. Other business -Adoption of minutes for June 15, 2006 Meeting, June 27, 2006 & July 7, 2006 Special Meetings 6. Adjournment Township of Oro-Medonte Committee of Adjustment Planning Report for July 13, 2006 Rosetta & Lester Parry 2006-B-14 2072 Line 3 North, Concession 3, Part Lot 8 (Ora) THE PROPOSAL The purpose of application 2006-B-14 is to permit a lot addition/boundary adjustment. The land to be severed and conveyed to the adjacent parcel of land also owned by the applicants, 2105 Line 2 North, is proposed to have a lot frontage along Line 2 North of approximately 93 metres (305 feet), a lot depth of approximately 239 metres (784 feet) and a lot area of approximately 3.7 hectares (9.3 acres). The land to be retained, 2072 Line 3 North, would have a lot frontage of approximately 239 metres (774 feet) and an area of approximately 54 hectares (135 acres). No new building lots are proposed to be created as a result of the lot addition. The existing landholding at 2105 Line 2 North is approximately 0.24 ha (0.6 acres), therefore the resultant lot size is proposed to be 4.0 ha (9.9 acres). MUNICIPAL POLICY, ZONING AND PREVIOUS APPROVALS Official Plan Designation - Agricultural Zoning By-law 97-95 Agricultural/Rural (AlRU) & Environmental Protection (EP) Zones Previous Applications - AGENCY COMMENTS (space is provided for the Committee to make notes) Simcoe County- Public Works Department- Building Department- Engineering Department- No concerns PLANNING DEPARTMENT BACKGROUND The applicants are proposing a boundary adjustment to convey and add approximately 3.7 ha (9.3 acres) to a neighbouring lot also owned by the applicants which is currently vacant at 2105 Line 2 North. The purpose of the adjustment is to provide a larger agricultural lot for 2105 Line 2 North. The land to be retained by the applicant 2072 3 North would have an area of approximately 135 acres, which is being used for a kennel operation and private residence. PLAN Plan to states: Boundary line adjustments or farm consolidations may be considered where the effect of the boundary adjustment or consolidation is to improve the viability of the farm operation provided: a) no new lot is created; and, b) the viability of using the lands affected by the application for agricultural uses is not adversely impacted if the application is approved. In reviewing the application, no new building lots will be created, the existing kennel operation will continue to exist and given the relatively small amount of land to be conveyed, the viability of using the lands affected by the application would not adversely impact a farm operation. On this basis, the application would generally conform to the Official Plan. PROVINCIAL POLICY STATEMENT The Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) which came into effect on March 1,2005 provides for appropriate development while protecting resources or provincial interest, public health and the quality of the natural environment. The PPS also sets the policy foundation for regulating the development and use of land. Municipal decisions must be consistent with the PPS. Section 2.3 of the PPS provides policies related to agricultural lands. The main objective of this section is that prime agricultural areas shall be protected for long term use for agriculture. Section 2.3.4.2 states lot adjustments in prime agricultural areas may be permitted for legal or technical reasons. Furthermore, the PPS goes on to state that impacts from any new or expanding non-agricultural uses on surrounding agricultural operations and lands should be mitigated to the extent feasible. Based on site inspection and reviewing aerial photography of the lands subject to the lot addition, it appears that the expansion of the non-agricultural lot, 2105 Line 2 North, may impact the existing or future agricultural potential of the surrounding property. To this end, it is staffs position that the subject application should be reduced such that the maximum lot area for the lands to be augmented is 1.0 ha (2.5 acres) as opposed to 4.0 ha (9.9 acres). This smaller area would be consistent with the maximum lot area that was historically permitted under the Township's Official Plan policies for residential lots in the Agricultural designation. ZONING BY -LAW The subject property is currently zoned Agricultural/Rural (AlRU) & Environmental Protection (EP) in the Township's Zoning By-law 97-95, as amended. The lot to be enhanced, 2105 Line 2 North, is currently zoned Rural Residential Two (RUR2). The land to be added to 2105 Line 2 North is zoned AlRU. If the application were approved, the new lot addition would conform with the provisions of the AlRU zone. It is recommended that the lands subject to the lot addition be rezoned to the AlRU zone to be consistent with the zoning fabric of the area. the expansion should be limited to a size to retain as much of the agricultural potential on the subject lands as possible. Staff conclude that a maximum lot size of 1.0 ha (2.5 acres) is reasonable as this would permit a more suitable area for a rural residential building lot while at the same time preserving the long-term agricultural potential of the remainder of the subject land. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Committee grant Provisional Consent regarding Application 2006-B-14 subject to the following conditions: 1. That three copies of a Reference Plan for the subject land indicating the severed parcel be prepared by an Ontario Land Surveyor be submitted to the Secretary- Treasurer; 2. That the applicant's solicitor prepare and submit a copy of the proposed conveyance for the parcel severed, for review by the Municipality; 3. That the severed lands be merged in title with 2105 Line 2 North and that the provisions of Subsection 3 or 5 of Section 50 of The Planning Act apply to any subsequent conveyance or transaction involving the subject lands; 4. That the maximum total lot area for the new lot be no greater than 1.0 ha (2.5 acres); 5. That the applicants solicitor provide an undertaking that the severed lands and the lands to be enhanced will merge in title; 6. That the applicant apply for and obtain a rezoning on the subject lands to accurately reflect the intended land use; and, 7. That the conditions of consent imposed by the Committee be fulfilled from the date of the giving of the notice. one year All of which is respectfully submitted, Andy Karaiskakis, HBA, ACST(A) Planner Glenn White Senior Planner Reviewed by, Township of Oro-Medonte Committee of Adjustment Planning Report for July 13, 2006 Margaret Phillips 2006-A-20 2261 Lakeshore Road East, Plan 952, Lot 63 (Om) PROPOSAL The applicant is proposing to replace a portion of an existing deck by an enclosed sunroom. The proposed sunroom will have an area of approximately 17 m2 (183 fe). The proposed sunroom will maintain the existing setback from the interior side lot line being 2.2 metres (7.3 feet). The following relief is being requested from Zoning By-law 97-95: i. Setback from the minimum required interior side yard of 3 metres (9.8 feet) to maintain the existing 2.2 metres (7.3 feet) for the proposed sunroom. MUNICIPAL POLICY, ZONING AND PREVIOUS APPROVALS Official Plan Designation -Shoreline Zoning By-law 97-95 - Shoreline Residential (SR) Zone Previous Applications - AGENCY COMMENTS (space is provided the Committee to make notes) Public Works Department- Building Department- Engineering Department- No concerns PLANNING FRAMEWORK Background The subject property has a lot frontage of approximately 18 metres (60 feet), a shoreline frontage of approximately 18 metres (60 feet) and a lot area of approximately 0.14 hectares (0.36 acres) and is presently occupied by a single detached dwelling and a detached garage. The applicant wishes to replace a portion of an existing deck by an enclosed sunroom having an area of approximately 17 (183 The existing deck encroaches the 3 metre (9.8 feet) required interior side yard setback. proposed sunroom maintain the existing 2.2 metres feet) set back from the west side lot to in is To maintain the existing character of this predominantly residential area. . To protect the natural features of the shoreline area and the immediate shoreline. The requested variance for a sunroom is considered to conform with the intent of the policies contained in the Official Plan. The proposed sunroom will be well buffered by a mature cedar hedge being situated along the westerly property line and also a mature tree, therefore the existing character is not being compromised. On this basis, the proposed variance would therefore conform with the intent of the policies contained in the Official Plan. Does the variance conform to the general intent of the Zoning By-law? The subject lot is currently zoned Shoreline Residential (SR). One of the purposes or goals of maintaining setbacks in residential areas is to maintain a positive built form and visual quality. The mature cedar hedge on the interior side lot line will provide a form of privacy for the abutting property for the proposed sunroom. The proposed sunroom will have little or no impact on the intent of the by-law to provide a low density residential character to the lot or the subdivision. The site inspection revealed that the proposed sunroom should not adversely impact the residential neighbourhood as the sunroom will not further encroach into the existing interior setback. Therefore the proposal is considered to conform with the general intent of the By-law. Is the variance appropriate for the desirable development of the lot? Based on the site inspection, the proposed sunroom would appear to be appropriate the desirable development of the lot and in keeping with the surrounding residential area. Given that the proposed sunroom would provide for a form of development that is suitable and consistent with the surrounding neighbourhood, it would not lead to the over development of the lot. Is the variance minor? On the basis that the proposal would not adversely affect the character of the shoreline residential area, the proposed variance is considered to be minor in nature. CONCLUSIONS The subject application to permit the replacement of a portion of an existing deck by an enclosed sunroom generally satisfies the four tests of the minor variance. It is recommended the following conditions: prior to pouring of the foundation that the existing setback for the sunroom be maintained; 2. That the appropriate building permit be obtained from the Township's Chief Building Official only after the Committee's decision becomes final and binding, as provided for within the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P. 13; and, 3. That the setbacks be in conformity with the dimensions as set out in the application and on the sketches and plans submitted with the application. All of which is respectfully submitted, Andy Karaiskakis HBA, ACST(A) Planner Reviewed by, Glenn White, MCIP, RPP Senior Planner Township of Oro-Medonte Committee of Adjustment Planning Report for July 13, 2006 Estate of John & Dorothy Howard 2006-B-16 4182 Line 10 N, Concession 10, East Part Lot 7, West Part Lot 6 (Medonte) THE PROPOSAL The purpose of application 2006-B-16 is to permit a technical severance to create an additional lot for rural residential purposes. The proponent has submitted a series of lengthy and complex legal descriptions and land conveyance history regarding this property. In order to fully assess conformity with the Township's Official Plan, a review of this material is required from the Township solicitor. As of the date of writing of this report, this review was not yet complete therefore staff recommend that the Committee defer the application at this time so that a legal opinion can be provided at which point staff will be in a position to assess the subject application. It is noted that in accordance with the Township's fees and charges By-law, the applicant will be responsible for such review costs. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Committee defer Application 2006-8-16 to allow for a review of the supporting documentation by the Township solicitor. All of which is respectfully submitted, Andy Karaiskakis, HBA, ACST(A) Planner Reviewed by, Glenn White RPP Planner Township of Oro-Medonte Committee of Adjustment Planning Report for July 13, 2006 Stephen St. Onge & Pauline Normand-St. Onge 2006-A-19 3523 Line 1 North, Concession 2, Part Lots 42 & 43 (Medonte) THE PROPOSAL The applicants are requesting permission from the Committee of Ad!ustment to permit the construction of a 86 m2 (925 te) second storey addition and a 28.6 m (308.3 tr) covered porch onto the existing dwelling which a portion of the dwelling is within the 30 metre (98.4 feet) setback limits of an Environmental Protection Zone. The existing dwelling is located 27 metres (88 feet) from the Environmental Protection Boundary Zone as shown on the attached sketch. The existing dwelling and proposed addition is located within the 30 metre (98.4 feet) setback limits of the Environmental Protection Zone as noted in Zoning By-law 97-95 Map A 14. As a result, permission is required from the Committee of Adjustment for the construction of the addition. MUNICIPAL POLICY, ZONING AND PREVIOUS APPROVALS Official Plan Designation - Rural & Environmental Protection Zoning By-law 97-95 - Agricultural/Rural (A/RU) & Environmental Protection (EP) Zones AGENCY COMMENTS (space is provided for the Committee to make notes) Public Works Department- Building Department- Engineering Department - No concerns PLANNING FRAMEWORK Background The subject property has a street frontage of approximately 352 metres (1,154 feet) along Line 1 North and a lot area of approximately 40 hectares (99 acres). The property is currently contains a single detached dwelling a various agricultural buildings. The applicants are proposing to construct a 86 m2 (925 tr) second storey addition and a 28.6 m2 (308.3 ff) covered porch onto the existing dwelling which a portion dwelling is within the 30 metre (98.4 feet) setback limits of an Environmental Protection Zone The existing dwelling and proposed is located the 30 metre (98.4 in Zoning By-law 97-95 the is a Does the variance conform to the general intent of the Official Plan? The property is designated Rural and Environmental Protection in the Official Plan. The primary function of the Rural designation is to preserve and promote the rural character of the Township and the maintenance of the open countryside and to prevent the intrusion of land uses which are incompatible with the rural character and/or resource activities of the area. Permitted uses in the Rural designation includes single detached dwellings as well as accessory uses. As the existing dwelling and proposed addition will maintain the character of the rural character of the community, the proposal appears to conform with the intent of the policies contained in the Official Plan. Does the variance conform to the general intent of the Zoning By-law? In assessing the issue of conformity with the Zoning By-law, the proposed addition and should not detract from the overall character of the lot and surrounding natural features being the Copeland Forest towards the rear of the property. One of the purposes of regulating structures being built within the 30 metres setback from the Environmental Protection Zone is to maintain and enhance the ecological integrity of the natural heritage system, to ensure that development does not occur on lands that are unstable or susceptible to flooding and to ensure that development does not occur on hazardous slopes. The application has been circulated to the Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority and at the time of writing of the planning report, no comments have been received. The Township mapping appears to recognize an Environmental Protection area which does not exist. This EP Zone Boundary will be examined by staff as part of the Zoning By-law Review to more accurately reflect the physical features and the Copeland Forest on the property. Based on site inspection by the Planning Department, the location of the existing dwelling appears to be flat and there is no evidence of a watercourse in the immediate area, therefore the proposed addition would therefore conform with the general intent of the Zoning By-law. Is the variance appropriate for the desirable development of the lot? The proposed addition should provide for a form of development that is suitable and consistent with the surrounding area. The proposed variance will provide for the construction of an addition to the existing dwelling and will continue to maintain the rural character of the area. On this basis the proposed variance would provide for the appropriate development of the lot. Is the variance minor? Committee is aware, "minor" is not determined on a mathematical basis. On the basis that the proposal is reasonable and would not appear to adversely affect the the Environmental Protection Zone, the proposed variance is considered to be minor. The satisfies 4 tests a minor variance. RECOMMENDATIONS It is recommended that the Committee approve minor variance 2006-A-18 subject to the following conditions: 1. That the size and setbacks of the proposed addition and covered porch be in conformity with the sketches submitted with the application and approved by the Committee; 2. That the appropriate building permit be obtained from the Township's Chief Building Official only after the Committee's decision becomes final and binding, as provided for within the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P. 13.; and, 3. That the applicants obtain a permit from the Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority under the Conservation Authorities Act, if required All of which is respectfully submitted, Andy Karaiskakis HBA, ACST(A) Planner Reviewed by, Glenn White, MCIP, RPP Senior Planner ; 4i1JII1! f Committee of Adiustment Minutes Thursdav June 15,2006,9:30 a.m. In Attendance: Chairperson Lynda Aiken, Member Allan Johnson, Member Dave Edwards Member Michelle Lynch, Secretary-Treasurer Andy Karaiskakis Absent Member: Garry Potter None declared 1. Communications and Correspondence None received 2. Disclosure of Pecuniary Interest 3. Hearinas: 9:30 Indian Park Association Plan M368, Lot 103 (Om) 2006-8-10 In Attendance: Brad & Tracy McCutcheon, agent representing applicants, 9 Sugarbush Road Motion No. CA060615-1 BE RESOLVED that: Moved by Allan Johnson, seconded by Dave Edwards "That the Committee hereby Grant Provisional Consent regarding Application 2006-8-10 subject to the following conditions: 1. That three copies of a Reference Plan for the subject land indicating the severed parcel be prepared by an Ontario Land Surveyor be submitted to the Secretary-Treasurer; 2. That the applicant's solicitor prepare and submit a copy of the proposed conveyance for the parcel severed, for review by the Municipality; 3. That severed lands merged in 9 that the provisions Subsection 3 or 5 Section 50 of subsequent conveyance or transaction Committee of Adjustment-June 15,2006 Page 5. That all municipal taxes be paid to the Township of Oro-Medonte; and, 6. That the conditions of consent imposed by the Committee be fulfilled within one year from the date of the giving of the notice. .. ...Carried." Commillee of Adjustment-June 15, 2006 Page 2 9:40 Doug Shelswell & Wayne ShelsweU Conc. 14, West Part lot 18 (Oro) 191 line 13 South 2006-B-11 In Attendance: Doug Shelswell, applicant Motion No. CA060615-2 BE IT RFSOl VED that: Moved by Dave Edwards, seconded by Michelle Lynch "That the Committee hereby Defer Consent Application 2006-8-11 to allow time for the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food to comment on this application. .. ...Carried," Committee of Adjustment-June 15, 2006 Page 3 9:50 Horseshoe Valley lands 2006-8-12 Conc. 4, Part Lots 3 & 4, RP 51 R-30671 , Parts 6, 7,8,10,11,18, 19, and 22 (Oro) In Attendance: Martin Kimble, representing Horseshoe Valley lands, Ted Onyschuk, 36 Tanglewood Cresc. Motion No. CA060615-3 BE RESOLVED that: Moved by Michelle Lynch, seconded by Allan Johnson "That the Committee hereby Grant Provisional Consent regarding Application 2006-B-12 subject to the following conditions: 1. That three copies of a Reference Plan for the subject land indicating the severed parcel be prepared by an Ontario Land Surveyor be submitted to the Secretary-Treasurer; 2. That the applicant's solicitor prepare and submit a copy of the proposed conveyance for the parcel severed, for review by the Municipality; and, 3. That the conditions of consent imposed by the Committee be fulfilled within one year from the date of the giving of the notice. .. ...Carried." Commiliee of Adjustment-June 15, 2006 Page 4 10:00 Susan Roubos Plan 1230, Lot 7 (Oro) 1644 Ridge Road East 2006-B-13 In Attendance: Susan & Steve Roubos, owners Motion No.CA060615-4 BE IT RFSOL VED that: Moved by Allan Johnson, seconded by Dave Edwards "That the Committee hereby Grant Provisional Consent regarding Application 2006-B-13 subject to the following conditions: 1. That the retained parcel's total lot area be increased from 0.17 ha (0.42 ac) to 0.2 ha (0.49 ac) in order to satisfy the minimum lot area standard for the Residential One (R1) Zone, as stated in the Township Zoning By- law, as amended; 2. That three copies of a Reference Plan for the subject land indicating the severed parcel be prepared by an Ontario Land Surveyor be submitted to the Secretary-Treasurer; 3. That the applicant's solicitor prepare and submit a copy of the proposed conveyance for the parcel severed, for review by the Municipality; 4. That the severed lands be merged in title with Lot 7 Plan 1230 and that the provisions of Subsection 3 or 5 of Section 50 of The Planning Act apply to any subsequent conveyance or transaction involving the subject lands; 5. That the applicants solicitor provide an undertaking that the severed lands and the lands to be enhanced will merge in title; 6. That all municipal taxes be paid to the Township of Oro-Medonte; 7. That the conditions of consent imposed by the Committee be fulfilled within one year from the date of the giving of the notice; and, 8. the applicants verify that the sewage system required setbacks as per Part 8 satisfaction " Committee of Adjustment-June 15, 2006 Page 5 10:10 Carol & Jeremy Kurtin 2006-A-15 Conc. 6, Part Lot 21, RP 51 R-17288, Part 1 (Oro) 172 Line 6 South In Attendance: Jeremy Kurtin, applicant Motion No. CA060615-5 BE IT RESOLVED that: Moved by Dave Edwards, seconded by Allan Johnson "That the Committee hereby Approve Minor Variance application 2006-A-15 subject to the following conditions: 1. That the size of the proposed detached workshop/garage be no larger than 133 m2 (1 ,440 fe); 2. That the appropriate building permit be obtained from the Township's Chief Building Official only after the Committee's decision becomes final and binding, as provided for within the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P. 13; 3. That the setbacks be in conformity with the dimensions as set out in the application and on the sketches submitted with the application and approved by the Committee; and, 4. That all municipal taxes be paid to the Township of Oro-Medonte .. ...Carried." Committee Adjustment-June 15, 2006 Page 10:20 Jeff Johnston Conc. 11! East Part Lot 4 (Oro) 2666 Line 11 North 2006-A-16 In Attendance: Jeff Johnston, applicant, and Denis Johnston Motion No. CA060615-6 BE IT R~SOL VEO that Moved by Michelle Lynch, seconded by Allan Johnson "That the Committee hereby Approve Minor Variance Application 2006-A-16 subject to the following conditions: 1. That the height of the detached garage not exceed 6.7 metres (22 feet) in accordance with the architectural drawings submitted with the application; 2. That an Ontario Land Surveyor provide verification to the Township of compliance with the Committee's decision by verifying in writing that the garage be no higher than 6.7 metres (22 feet); 3. That the appropriate building permit be obtained from the Township's Chief Building Official only after the Committee's decision becomes final and binding, as provided for within the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P. 13.; 4. That all municipal taxes be paid to the Township of Oro-Medonte; and, 5. That all setbacks and dimensions be in conformity as set out in the application and on the sketches submitted with the application and approved by the Committee. ... ..Carried." Committee of Adjustment-June 15, 2006 Page 10:30 Marion Tilstra Plan M30, Lot 15, RP 51R-33067, Part 19 (Oro) 19 Seneca Lane 2006-A-13 In Attendance: Marion Tilstra, applicant Motion No. CA060615-7 BE RESOLVED that: Moved by Dave Edwards, seconded by Allan Johnson "That the Committee hereby Approve Minor Variance Application 2006-A-13 subject to the following conditions: 1. That the setbacks be in conformity with the dimensions as set out in the application and on the sketches submitted with the application and approved by the Committee; 2. That the footings are a minimum 1.2 metres below ground surface (i.e. below potenticil frost pen-etratfon) and into native ground; 3. That all backfill for the foundation walls be placed and compacted to 95% of Standard Proctor Maximum Dry Density, to the satisfaction of the Township Building Department and/or Engineering Department; 4. No fill or backfill materials be pushed beyond the proposed building area closer to the slope; 5. The roof leaders from the proposed addition be directed to and down the slope via a lined channel or carried in a pipe fashion on the surface down to the toe of the slope in order to avoid any potential concerns with respect to surface erosion from discharge from the roof runoff; 6. The area of fill be terraced and landscaped to minimize surface erosion and creep in the long-term; 7. That no structures be constructed on the fill; 8. The mature vegetation on the slope in the northwest corner of the property be maintained as it assists in maintaining a stable slope and minimizing surface erosion; 9. That the appropriate building permit be obtained from the Township's Chief Building Official only after the Committee's decision becomes final and binding, as provided for within the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P. 13; and, 10. That all municipal taxes be paid to the Township of Oro-Medonte. " Committee of Adjustment-June 15, 2006 Page 8 5. Other Business i. Adoption of minutes for the May 11, 2006 Meeting Motion No. CA060615-8 Moved by Allan Johnson, Seconded by Dave Edwards .. . -. . ... . ~ . "That the minutes for the May 11th 2006 Meeting be adopted as printed ard circulated ...Carried." 6. Adjournment Motion No. CA060615-9 Moved by Dave Edwards, Seconded by Michelle lynch "We do now adjourn at 11 :50 a.m." ... Carried." (NOTE: A digital recording of this meeting is available for review.) Chairperson, Lynda Aiken Secretary-Treasurer, Andy Karaiskakis, ACST(A) Committee of Adjuslmenl-june 15, 2006 Page Committee of Adiustment Minutes Tuesdav June 27, 2006, 8:00 a.m. In Attendance: Chairperson Lynda Aiken, Member Allan Johnson, Member Dave Edwards Member Michelle Lynch, Secretary-Treasurer Andy Karaiskakis Absent Member: Garry Potter 1. Communications and Correspondence Those received are referred to in the Planning Report 2. Disclosure of Pecuniary Interest None declared 3. Hearin~s: 8:00 William Ryckman & Deborah Millingen 2006-A-17 Conc. 8, Part lot 4, RP 51 R-33080, Part 1 (Medonte) 3883 line 8 North In Attendance: Angela Rudy, agent representing applicants, William Ryckman & Deborah Millingen, applicants Motion No. CA060627-1 RESOLVED that: Moved by Dave Edwards, seconded by Michelle Lynch "That the Committee hereby Approve Minor Variance Application 2006-A-17 subject to the following conditions: 1. That the size and setbacks of the proposed dwelling and detached garage be in conformity with the sketches submitted with the application and approved by the Committee; 2. an Ontario Land Surveyor provide verification compliance Committee's decision 1) verifying writing prior to pouring of the foundation so that i) dwelling including the attached decks be located no closer 4 metres (13 and detached garage be no closer 19 27, Page 4. That the dwelling be setback a watercourse; and, of 30 metres (100 feet) from the 5. That the applicants obtain a permit from the Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority under the Conservation Authorities Act. .....Carried." 5. Other Business None 6. Adjournment Motion No. CA060627-2 Moved by Dave Edwards, Seconded by Michelle Lynch "We do now adjourn at 8:25 a.m." ... Carried." (NOTE: A digital recording of this meeting is available for review.) Chairperson, Lynda Aiken Secretary-Treasurer, Andy Karaiskakis, ACST(A) Committee of Adiustment Minutes Friday July 7,2006,8:00 a.m. In Attendance: Chairperson Lynda Aiken, Member Allan Johnson, Member Dave Edwards, Member Garry Potter, Member Michelle Lynch, and Secretary- Treasurer Andy Karaiskakis 1. Communications and Correspondence None received 2. Disclosure of Pecuniary Interest None declared 3. Hearin~s: 8:00 John & Alka Raymond Plan 780, Lot 24 (Orillia) 49 Eight Mile Point Road 2006-A-18 Attendance: John Raymond, applicant, Ann luchka, 47 Eight Mile Road, Helen & Steve Luchka Motion No. CA060707-1 BE IT RESOLVED that: Moved by Garry Potter, seconded by Michelle Lynch "That the Committee hereby Deny Minor Variance Application 2006-A-18 based on the request of an increase in height of a boathouse is not minor .. ...Carried." Page 6. Adjournment Motion No. CA060707-2 Moved by Dave Edwards, Seconded by Allan Johnson "We do now adjourn at 8:50 a.m." ... Carried." (NOTE: A digital recording of this meeting is available for review.) Chairperson, Lynda Aiken Secretary-Treasurer, Andy Karaiskakis, ACST{A)