The URL can be used to link to this page

06 28 2006 COW AgendaTOWNSHIP OF ORO- MEDONTE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING AGENDA COUNCIL CHAMBERS DATE: WEDNESDAY, JUNE 28, 2006 TIME: 1:00 p.m. 1. NOTICE OF ADDITIONS TO AGENDA 2. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA 3. DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST AND THE GENERAL NATURE THEREOF: - "IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ACT" 4. DEPUTATIONS: a) 1:00 p.m. Steve St. Onge, re: Discussion of Concerns. 5. CORRESPONDENCE: a) Midland Public Library Board, minutes of May 11, 2006 meeting. b) Dalton McGuinty, Premier, correspondence dated June 7, 2006 re: Registration and Licensing of Physicians of Ontario. c) Harry Alkema, Chair Person, Muscular Dystrophy, correspondence dated June 12, 2006 re: Request to Waive Tent Permit Fee, Trehaven Muscular Dystrophy Easter Seal Golf Tournament, July 8, 2006. d) Albert Delong, correspondence received June 15, 2006 re: OPA 16, Nad -Core Environmental Shredding Ltd. e) Glenn Meeuwisse, Hardwood Hills, correspondence dated June 8, 2006 re: Partial Road Closure Request, Line 6 North, August 26/27, 2006 and September 30, 2006. f) Lake Simcoe Regional Airport Commission, minutes of May 18, 2006 meeting. g) Oro - Medonte History Association, minutes of May 5, 2006 meeting. h) Gayle Wood, CAO, Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority, correspondence dated June 2, 2006 re: 2005 Environmental Monitoring Report [complete package available in the Clerk's office]. 6. FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION: a) Citizen of the Year Advisory Group, minutes of June 19, 2006 meeting. 7. PUBLIC WORKS: a) Jerry Ball, Public Works Superintendent, discussion re: correspondence dated May 10, 2006 from D.G. Blanchard Director, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Divestiture of Small Craft Harbours Facilities — Cathew Bay and Hawkestone. b) Jerry Ball, Public Works Superintendent, discussion re: Capital Road Construction Projects. c) Report No. PW 2006 -10, Jerry Ball, Public Works Superintendent, re: Request for Speed Reduction — Line 4 South. 8. ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES: None. 9. BUILDING, PLANNING AND BY -LAW ENFORCEMENT: a) Committee of Adjustment, minutes of June 15, 2006 meeting. 10. EMERGENCY SERVICES: None. 11. RECREATION AND COMMUNITY SERVICES: a) Report No. RC 2006 -06, Chris Carter, Manager of Recreation and Community Services, re: Grant Request for Playground Equipment — Guthrie P.S. 12.IN- CAMERA: a) Jennifer Zieleniewski, CAO, re: Property Matter. b) Jennifer Zieleniewski, CAO, re: Legal Matter. 13.ADJOURNMENT: `a t ADDENDUM COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING Wednesday, June 28, 2006 5. CORRESPONDENCE: i) Shirley and Michael Paisley, correspondence dated June 26, 2006 re: Speed Reduction Request Bidwell Road and Woodland Crescent. j) Irena - Wieslawa Szczebior, correspondence received May 30, 2006 re: Line 4 South between Highway 11 and the Ridge Road [Refer to Item 7c)]. 6. FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION: b) Report No. TR 2006 -14, Paul Gravelle, Treasurer, re: Renewal of Insurance Coverage. 12.IN- CAMERA: c) Jennifer Zieleniewski, CAO, re: Personnel Matter. n 1 ;i. T I RM Page 1 of 5 DATE: May 11, 2006 LOCATION: Midland Public Library Boardroom PRESENT: G.AA Walker, A. Campbell, B. Trounce, A. Wilkes, B. Desroches, J. Swick, C. Moore, B. Jeffery, REGRETS: Oz Parsons, STAFF: B. Molesworth, CEO rum 1. Call to order 3. ISSUE The meeting was called to order at 7:00 Approval of the agenda Additions: 4. Business arising from the minutes 4.3 E -Audio 7. New Business 7.1 Letter from SOLS 8. Information 8.2 Market Survey Moved by: B. Desroches Seconded by: C. Moore That the agenda be approved as amended. Approval of the minutes of the previous meeting y�N 1 6 10 ©6 Correction: J. Swick is listed as present and he was not Moved by: J. Swick Seconded by: B. Desroches That the minutes of the Board meeting of March 9, 2006 be approved as corrected. AU I IVA • 1 1 ,.l 1 DATE: May 11, 2006 ITEM 4. lot lag 113 11 [affl .3m, LOCATION: Midland Public Library Boardroom ISSUE Business arising from the minutes 4.1 Architectural Drawings/Letter B. Molesworth distributed the letter he and Stephen Langmead have been working on for review by the Board. In response to a question he explained that the study last year established how much space was needed and where it could go, but that any drawings produced will have much more detail regarding how the space would work, where the services would be located, how plumbing and wiring would be arranged and what new services and/or spaces could be accommodated. As well, they will be detailed enough so accurate cost figures can be produced. Attached were the names of two firms recommended by Mr. Langmead. B. Molesworth said he had looked them up on the Internet and had been surprised at the large scale of most of their projects. He had spoken to Mr. Langmead about this, but he assured us that both these firms were not only very competent, they were quite interested. B. Molesworth suggested adding Peter Archer's name as well. He did a very nice job on an addition to the Carnegie building in Penetang and is based in Barrie. The Board directed that the letter should be sent. 4.2 Reading Series B. Molesworth distributed a draft of a text to be included in the Reading Series Pamphlet. The Board made some suggestions which will be incorporated. B. Molesworth reported that the Minor has suggested a 4 page supplement celebrating the series, funded by paid advertising. B. Molesworth had expected to spend about $1,000.00. The representative has already sold some space to other businesses, but is asking for a $2,000.00 contribution from the Series to give it a higher profile. We spent no money on advertising last year and that was a mistake. We did get two very good stories placed, one in each paper, but they were almost too late to have an effect. Page 2 of 5 DATE: May 11, 2006 LOCATION: Midland Public Library Boardroom ITEM 4. 5. ISSUE Business arising from the minutes - continued The Series has raised $1,000.00 so far in sponsorships and is still waiting to hear from the Canada Council. Whether we get that money or not will probably dictate whether we make a profit or not, but with good advertising we expect to sell a lot more tickets. There are other papers; the Free Press, the Springwater paper, and a free paper that the Mirror will be distributing to the cottages once a month this year. A. Wilkes thought the jump from $0 to $2,000.00 was too big and wondered if we wanted to save some money for other venues. She suggested a little negotiation. C. Moore asked about posters and flyers and volunteered to distribute as many as possible. They will be ready in another week or so. J. Swick thought we had to have a strong presence and as this was to be a big production, it would be worth the money. G.A. Walker suggested the Friends might be prepared to help. B. Jeffery suggested PSA's on the radio and TV stations. B. Moleswortb will discuss the final figure with the rep and contact. 4.3 E -Audio SOLS is considering starting a consortium like the one that distributes the E- Books, though getting started is more expensive. Bill thinks it's worth investigating. There will be a discussion on it at the Simcoe County Librarians' meeting on Wed. the 17'" and he will bring some information to the next meeting. of the accounts The cheque register was distributed. Moved by: A. Campbell Seconded by: A. Wilkes That the accounts for the month of April 2006 totalling $17,175.54 be approved. �ci A Page 3 of 5 A1.11VP1 • •' 1 1 DATE: May 11, 2006 ITEM 6. 0 liz LOCATION: Midland Public Library Boardroom ISSUE Reports of Board Committees 6.1 Finance Committee — Budget 2006 The budget for 2006 has been approved so the year to date figures were actual. A. Campbell said that at one third of the year we were under 33% expenditure. There were questions about a couple of over expend( items. B. Molesworth will check on the Health and Safety one. 6.2 Strategic Planning Committee No report. 6.3 Fundraising committee The letters have been mailed. 6.4 Policy Committee C. Moore distributed copies of the Terms and Conditions of Employm( and the Policies and Procedures. Neither had been revised for at least 10 years and both had to be extensively amended to recognize changes in service and technology. The Members are asked to review both and bring any questions or comments to the next meeting. B. Molesworth commended the Committee members for their hard work over almost two years. 6.5 Reports from the Friends of the Midland Public Library There was not a quorum at the Tuesday meeting but the Book Sale is going ahead with a large stock of items already in storage. The sign the Friends donated has been installed on the front lawn. The bench has not arrived but is on order by the Parks department and is coming. A. Wilkes asked if the Friends would consider offering the smaller bags with the Library picture on it again. She finds it a more convenient size. B. Molesworth will take the question to the Friends. Page 4 of 5 ACHUIN DATE: May 11, 2006 ITEM 7 8. 9. MIDLAND PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD MEETING LOCATION: Midland Public Library Boardroom ISSUE New business 7.1 Letter from SOLS A letter from SOLS to the chair thanking the Board for its previous support and seeking help to fund its innovation fund. The Board declined to contribute. Information 8.1 Chief Librarian's Report As distributed. 8.2 Market Survey One copy of a detailed survey conducted by the Federation of Ontario Libraries, received only recently and not fully reviewed. B. Molesworth said there is lots of information, especially about the adoption of technological sources of information and about the types of users of Libraries. Any Member can borrow the report for their own review if they care to. Adjournment Moved by: J. Swick That the meeting be adjourned at 8:53 p.m. IaQ li_�- Chairman of the Board Chief Librarian Page 5 of 5 AU HUIN The Premier of Ontario Legislative Building Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1 Al June 7, 2006 Le Premier ministee de I'Ontario Edifice de I'Asserno6e legislative Queen's Park Toronto (Ontario) M7A 1 Ai His Worship I Neil Craig Mayor Township of Oro - Medonte 148 Line 7 South PO Box 100 Oro, Ontario LOL 2X0 Dear Mayor Craig: 7 i JUN � 'J 20 080- MEDONTE Thank you for your letter providing me with a copy of council's resolution regarding registration and licensing of physicians in Ontario. I appreciate your keeping me informed of council's activities. I note that you have sent a copy of council's resolution to my colleague the Honourable George Smitherman, Minister of Health and Long -Term Care. I trust that the minister will also take council's views into consideration. Thank you again for the information. Yours truly, awe� M, �f Dalton McGuinty Premier c: The Honourable George Smitherman May 12, 2006 The Honourable Dalton McGuinty Premier of Ontario Queen's Park, Room 281 Main Legislative Building Toronto, ON M7A1All Dear Premier McGuinty: The Ontario Medical Association's report entitled "Ontario Physician Shortage 2005" predicts that the Provincial Physician Shortage will reach 2,300 this year and will continue to escalate. The physician shortage is particularly pronounced in rural Ontario. For these reasons, the Township of Malahide has requested support in their petition that the Minister of Health for Ontario be requested to propose an amendment to the Medicine Act to permit the College of Physicians & Surgeons to license physicians who are in good standing and who have written the necessary examinations thereby bringing additional fully qualified physicians ready to commence practice immediately in our Province, while long -term solutions are being implemented. The Township of Oro - Medonte financially supports the Physician Recruitment Committees in our area. Council has also established an Ad Hoc Working Group to investigate incentives to bring qualified physicians to our community. Allowing Physicians, with recognized equivalency, to commence practice in Ontario would facilitate the influx of doctors in Ontario in a relatively short period of time. Further, an amendment to the Ontario Medicine Act to allow the recognition of specific Medical Exams as equivalent would permit the College of Physicians and surgeons to grant licenses to practice medicine in Ontario to those Physicians who are in good standing and have written the necessary exams. Therefore, Council of the Township of Oro - Medonte, is in support of the Township of Malahide's request. Your favourable consideration will expedite the availability of doctors in Ontario, particularly in rural Ontario. Yours truly, " J. Neil Craig Mayor /jt cc: Hon. George Smitherman, Minister of Health & Long Term Care Ontario College of Physicians and Surgeons Association of Municipalities of Ontario Garfield Dunlop MPP, Simcoe North The Township of Malahide Members of Council �N n Township Atm. Town Counsel Box 100 Oro Ontario LOL 2X0 Dear Counsel Members, 15TH ANNUAL L A 'LN MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY EASTER SEAL GOLF TOURNAMENT JULY I: 2006 W__.. 12/06/06 As Chair person for the Annual Trehaven Muscular Dystrophy Easter Seal Golf Tournament I am respectfully requesting that the permit fee for the 40'x 60' push pole tent be wavered. This event is in its fifteenth year and hosted at the Trehaven Golf & Country Club. The Tournament is operated by a volunteer Board and all proceeds are directed to the Muscular Dystrophy Association for research and community charities for families with children with disabilities in this geographical area. Each year we host this event which has two hundred and fifty to three hundred participants attend from all over the province. This also includes many fire - fighters from around the province. It is the committee's goal each year, to make this a fully donated event so that all the proceeds will be directed to intended organizations. The Trehaven Golf Course each year has closed its doors to the general public and donates the full use of the golf course to our venture. The community businesses in Orillia, Oro- Medonte, and Barrie provide an overwhelming support through the donation of prizes and sponsorships to this Tournament on a yearly basis. The enjoyable aspect of this event is that because it is so well supported by community through donations, that we as the committee can maintain this Tournament as an event that all can afford to attend. Each golfer has an entrance fee of seventy dollars which includes a day of golf, roast beef dinner, and prize. This year the tournament will be held on July 08 2006. Over the past fourteen years the Annual Trehaven Muscular Dystrophy Easter Seals Golf Tournament has raised $300,000.00. Last year our one day event in its self raised $19,082.00. The tent which has been sponsored by the Oro District Lions is a 40' x 60' push pole tent and will be erected by Barrie Tent & Awning. It is the Committees hope that this Counsel will consider our request and gain waver the cost for the permit. I look forward to your response. Tha espectfully submitted, A' em Chair Person Muscular Dystrophy Easter Seals Chair Person 61 Shoreline Dr. RR #1 Hawkestone Ont. LOL 1T0 Voice 705- 326 -5842 Email halkemaLtroges.co MAKEMIUSCLES MOVE J, f C_ 'L°. Albert belong 1472 Line 6 N. R.R. 1, Oro Station On, LOL 2E0 iWK�v f >g� oN�� MEN Nye Township of Oro Medonte &110 ,, Attention: C.J. Williams OMB File No. Z050199 ko P My name is Albert Delong. I live at 1472 line 6 N. which is part of the east half of lot 1 I concession 6, Oro Medonte. I am not only representing myself but other residents who have signed a petition against rezoning for a wood chipping operation. We have met with Mr. Tom Watkin of Ainley Associates to discuss the proposed wood chipping operation which Nad -Core Environmental Shredding Ltd. wishes to put into operation across the road from us. We are unsatisfied with his assurances that it will not interfere with our daily lives. We were told there won't be very much traffic. But all the studies in the world cannot tell us what the traffic will be like in the future as the business grows. The proposed driveway is directly across the road from the home of Doug Coughlin. There are a lot of cyclists on the Old Barrie Road, especially between the fifth and seventh concessions. We already have a large number of trucks due to the landfill site and the gravel pit. Tractor trailers are using this route as well. We were assured that the noise should not exceed background conditions. Right now we listen to heavy diesel trucks which use their fake brakes coming down the grade from the west. We listen to trucks and equipment at the landfill site which includes back up beeping and we listen to airplanes flying over from the airport. Perhaps two wood chippers and extra trucks adding to this don't seem like much but the cumulative noise is very stressful. We live in a valley and the noise reverberates so that people hear it much further away than you might think. The comer of the sixth line and the Old Barrie Road is a heritage site named Morningstar Comer,after The Morningstar Hotel built by my wife's great grandfather in the mid nineteenth century. As you can see my wife's family has been here many years. We have no intention of leaving and our son intends to live here eventually. We have nothing against industry but this is not the proper place for it. This area is mostly residential. We don't want to be surrounded by industry with little regard for residents. -2- People are building lives here. We want peace and quiet for our families and our seniors. We want the sound of nature, which is gradually fading. We are concerned with the impact on the natural habitat of deer, bear, wild turkeys, foxes and other wildlife. Because the site is flanked on the north by the Oro Moraine we believe a proper natural resources study should be done taking into consideration the stream which is a home for speckled trout on the south side of The Old Barrie Road. We are concerned the water table could be changed, affecting the stream and people's wells. Also, we request an environmental impact study be performed before any zoning change is considered. Thank you for listening to our concerns. Yours truly, Albert Delong cc. Ontario Municipal Board County of Simcoe Burgar Rowe J-0 We, the undersigned, oppose a wood chipping /composting operation on Lot 11, concession 7, Oro Medonte. The noise level, extra truck traffic, devaluation of our homes and environmental impact will have a negative effect on our daily lives. NAME SIGNATURE ADDRESS .9 ado �9-« 7 rh o<o 13neer PHONE 9 %- � (� �k7 -7R 7Z 8�7 -386? 7 7 From :HARDWOOD HILLS 705 487 2153 06/08/2006 08:55 #581 P.002/003 June 8, 2006 Marilyn Pennycook Township of Oro — Medonte Fax (705) 487 -0133 Marilyn, Hardwood Hills would like to request partial road closure of the 6a' Line of Oro, North of Old Barrie Road for approx 1 km. The road closure would allow for bicycle crossing and bicycle traffic for two specific events on the dates below. These events are fully sanctioned and insured by the Ontario Cycling Association. The race organization will provide "marshals' at the closure and crossing points to ensure rider safety. 1) Saturday /Sunday Aug 26/27 — Ontario Cup Mountain Bike Event, 2) Saturday September 30 — 8 Hour Mountain Bike Relay Event. Permission for the same events was granted in 2004 and 2005, with no apparent problems. Attached is the proposed letter distributed to all mailboxes on the 6`b Line between Old Barrie Rd and Bass Lake Side Rd. Please let me know if you require any more information. Thank you for your consideration. GIenn Meeuwisse Hardwood Hills From:HARDW00D HILLS 705 487 2153 06/08/2006 08:55 #581 P.003/003 Dear Neighbor, Hardwood Hills will be hosting the 2006 Ontario Cup this weekend Aug 26/27. As part of the event riders will be crossing the 6a' line of Oro just north of Old Barrie Road. For the safety of the riders and possible drivers we have requested that this 1 km section be closed from 8 am to 5 pm for Saturday Aug 26 and Sunday Aug 27, The Township has approved this closure. This section will be partially barricaded to allow local traffic. We appreciate your help with this matter. Please feel free to contact myself if you have any concerns or questions. Thank you, Glenn Meeuwisse Hardwood Hills 487 -3775 W/ MINUTES OF A MEETING Of THE LAKE SIMCOE REGIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION HELD ON THURSDAY MAY 18, 2006 AT THE LAKE SIMCOE REGIONAL AIRPORT TERMINAL BUILDING In Attendance: Commissioners: J. Crawford R. Hough L. Leach P. Mulrooney A. Smith F. Smith P. Spears Regrets: G. Fernandes S. Trotter � - Staff: W. McArthur, City of Barrie M. Drumm, APM t L CALL TO ORDER i The meeting came to order at 7:00 p.m. and was chaired by A. Smith. 1.0 DECLARATION(S) OF PECUNIARY INTEREST(S) OR CONFLICTS OF INTERESTS) A. Smith opened the floor for declarations of pecuniary interest(s) or potential conflict(s) of interest(s). None were declared. 2.0 PRESENTATION — FASKEN MARTINEAU— 7.05 P.M. TO 7.30 P.M. Mr. Brett Bell of Fasken Martineau was invited to Commission meeting at 7:05 p.m. to present the findings of the Strategic Communications Plan. It was reviewed that Fasken Martineau was selected in June 2005 to conduct a survey of existing and future clientele with the purpose of gathering feedback on the current level of satisfaction with the airport's operations and the potential impact of the Commission's plans for expansion. The report included a profile of the survey respondents, the types of usage(s), an overall rating, impact of potential investments, communication(s) and a review of government and governance. The report concluded with recommendations. General discussion. Following a brief questions and answer session, B. Bell was thanked for his time and excused from the meeting at 7:30 p.m. MOTION: Moved by P. Spears, seconded by J. Crawford 2006 -AC -27 "THAT, the Lake Simcoe Regional Airport Commission receive the Lake Simcoe Regional Airport Client/Business Survey Results Report dated April 13, 2006, as prepared by Fasken Martineau." Carried. 3.0 MINUTES OF THE APRIL 20 2006 COMMISSION MEETING MOTION: Moved by P. Mulrooney, seconded by P. Spears 4.0 5.0 6.0 2006 -AC -28 "THAT, the minutes of the April 20, 2006 Commission meeting be approved." Carried. CONFIDENTIAL MINUTES OF THE APRIL 20 2006 COMMISSION MEETING MOTION: Moved R. Hough, seconded by J. Crawford 2006 -AC -29 "THAT, the confidential minutes of the April 20, 2006 Commission meeting be approved." Carried. BUSINESS ARISING FROM THE MINUTES No new business was discussed. PROPERTIES & COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT Pursuant to the April 20, 2006 Commission meeting minutes, M. Drumm confirmed that FCS was advised by correspondence dated April 20, 2006 (copied to Weatherwise Aviation and Township of Oro - Medonte CBO) that the Lake Simcoe Regional Airport Commission no longer requires the active services provided by FCS Fire Consulting Services Ltd. Supporting documentation was also distributed for review. General discussion. ii) W. McArthur and M. Drumm reviewed the construction update as of May 12, 2006. General discussion. W. McArthur was given direction to advertise an RFP (Request for Proposal) for the detail design of the parallel taxiway system. It was reviewed that Pryde, Schropp McComb Inc completed the original pre - design. iii) A. Smith reviewed that a Sub - Committee consisting of G. Fernandes, L. Leach, J. Crawford and M. Drumm met to review the airport's Strategic Plan (G. Fernandes was absent). The results of the preliminary meeting suggested that a review of the current Strategic Plan include a high -level document outlining the key focus points of the airport's direction, rather than a detailed document. it was also reviewed that the new Strategic Plan should be modeled towards the airport itself and not necessarily the Commission. A. Smith concluded by noting that while the members of the Sub - Committee do bring valuable insight and resources to the process, that professionals be ultimately engaged to assist with the development of the new Strategic Plan. General discussion. IV) As a result of a confidential property matter, the following motion was passed. MOTION: Moved by L. Leach, seconded by F. Smith 2006 -AC -30 "THAT, the Lake Simcoe Regional Airport Commission meeting move into camera at 8:25 P.M. to review a confidential property matter." MOTION: Moved by L. Leach, seconded by P. Spears Carried. 2006 -AC-31 "THAT, the Lake Simcoe Regional Airport Commission meeting move out of camera at 9:20 p.m." Carried. FINANCIAL REPORT The March 31, 2006 and YTD financial report(s) were presented. MOTION: F. Smith, seconded by R. Hough 2006 -AC-32 "THAT, the March 31, 2006 & YTD Financial Reports be approved, as presented." Carried. 5.0 NEW BUSINESSICORRESPONDENCE � t i) The airport manager's report was received as information. ii) All additional correspondence as presented was reviewed. 6.0 MEETING(S) The next Commission meeting is to be held on Thursday June 15, 2006 at 7:00 p.m. 7.0 ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by F. Smith, seconded by L. Leach 2006 -AC-33 "THAT, the Lake Simcoe Regional Airport Commission meeting adjourn at 9:30 p.m." Carried. Secretary, LSRA Commission Distribution: Commission Members Finance Department, City of Barrie 1. Brown, City Manager, City of Orillia Clerk's Office, City of Barrie Mayor & Council, clo City Clerk, City of Orillia Clerk's Office, Township of Oro - Medonte B. Stanton, M.P. P. Brown, M.P. J. Tascona, M.P.P. G. Dunlop, M.P.P. ,-°- Oro- Medonte History Association Meeting Minutes, 5 May 2006 Attendance: Sheila Kirkland, Jadeen Henderson, Allan Howard, Bruce Wiggins, Geoffrey Booth. Regrets: Councilor Ruth Fountain Minutes of 5 April meeting — amend "Heritage Day — deferred. ", to read "deferred to July." - amend " "Update signage for African Church — proper equipment... ", to read "proper signage... ". MOVED by Bruce, SECONDED by Allan, that minutes be accepted as amended. PASSED. Business Arising • Second edition of African Church book deferred until July. • Steele book — Association awaiting response from Orillia Historical Society re: date to meet (firm date to be set at June meeting). Sheila will email electronic copy of article to Geoff and Allan for comments and editing. Subcommittee to meet at Northway on 10 May to discuss project. • Presentation Tea — date cannot be set because framing of artwork not complete. All members agreed that Sheila should go ahead and get remaining works framed • African Church service — tentative date set for 31 July. Allan will head subcommittee and attend to agenda items. Sheila will order toilet for summer opening, which can also be used for the service. • Ontario Heritage tool kit — members still reading — defer to September. • Updated signs for African Church — template was circulated for members to view and comment on. Bruce will order. • African Church pamphlet — Allan presented several options to members., and will incorporate member feedback. New Business • Proposal for Guthrie United Church — circulated. Members agreed that Sheila should next approach Township staff with the proposal. • Allan to lead Church tour on 27 May. • Cleaning day and set -up for African Church — Bruce will do this on first day Church is open in July. • Summer Schedule for Church • Bruce — July 8, July 22 • Sheila — July 29, Aug 12 • Allan — Aug. 5, Aug. 26 • Geoff — July 15, Aug. 19 • Creighton Hall — The Association has received information that it may be demolished. Allan will take pictures of the site, in case this comes to pass. • Tour of Medonte set for 17 June — meet at Smuggler's Ghost Golf Course for breakfast (Bruce to arrange). Geoff will contact Jim Richardson for permission to visit the cairn on his farm. v d • Geoff to re- contact Black History Society in Toronto re: posters for Black History Month. • Heritage Day pamphlet — 19 August. Bruce distributed a flyer about the event. The Association could put up a static display, preferably in the Town Hall. • Sheila reported that Loreen Rice -Lucas is repairing the Hawkestone photo album. Members wish to thank Loreen for her work in this regard. Correspondence Email from woman in Colorado, wanting information on Leigh's Corners. Sheila has responded. Letter from June Sanderson re: Govan Station memorial stone fence. Geoff reported that this project is already underway. Next meeting: Wednesday, 7 June, 2006, at the Northway. 2 t Tel: 905.895.1281 1.800.4650437 Fax: 905.853.5881 F,Mail: info @lsrca.on.ca Web: wwwlsrca.on.ca 120 Bayview Parkway Box 282 Newmarket, Ontario L3Y 4X1 A watershed For Life * °°`.l { June 2, 2006 Ms. Marilyn Pennycook Clerk Township of Oro - Medonte BOX 100 Oro, ON LOL 2X0 Dear Ms. Pennycook: Re: 2005 Environmental Monitoring Report The Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority's Board of Directors, at their meeting held on Friday, May 26, 2006, passed the following resolution: BOD -06 -81 RESOLVED THAT Staff Report No. 26- 06 -BOD regarding the 2005 Environmental Monitoring Report be received for information; and FURTHER THAT the 2005 Environmental Monitoring Report be approved for release to Authority partners and general public. Included with this letter is a copy of Staff Report No. 26- 06 -BOD and a CD which contains a copy of the 2005 Environmental Monitoring Report. Please share this information with Council and staff. Yours truly, D. Gayle ood, CMM III Chief Administrative Officer Encl. c: R. Baldwin, LSRCA D. Lembcke, LSRCA ss�cu hE w c� 1. J O y Op R�"))IfM A45a TO : Board of Directors Staff Report No. Page No. File No. Agenda Item No. 26- 06 -BOD 1 of 3 VI 7 BOD -05 -06 FROM : David Lembcke Environmental Monitoring Coordinator DATE : May 11, 2006 SUBJECT: 2005 Environmental Monitoring Report RECOMMENDATION: THAT Staff Report No. 26- 06 -BOD regarding the 2005 Environmental Monitoring Report be received for information; and FURTHER THAT the 2005 Environmental Monitoring Report be approved for release to Authority partners and general public. Purpose of Staff Report: The purpose of this Staff Report is to provide the Authority's Board of Directors with a summary of Environmental Monitoring activities and results conducted in 2005 and to obtain approval to release the report to Authority partners and the general public. Background: The monitoring of environmental conditions across the watershed is carried out for a variety of purposes. Specifically, it is necessary for the evaluation of the quantity and quality of precipitation, riverflow and groundwater, as well as biotic data sets including populations of fish and benthic invertebrates. These data sets are important for the analyses of contaminants, nutrient loading into Lake Simcoe, hydrological and hydraulic modelling, groundwater investigations, flood plain mapping and the general assessment of watershed health. The Authority works with various partner agencies including Environment Canada, Natural Resources Canada, the Ministry of the Environment, the Ministry of Natural Resources, local and regional municipalities to continue monitoring activities. In 2005, Authority staff conducted a variety of environmental monitoring programs. Monitoring of surface water quantity and quality included the maintenance of ongoing projects such as stream gauging and the Provincial Water Quality Monitoring Network and included special projects such as baseflow measurements, Toxic Pollutant Screening monitoring and Lagoon City Nutrient monitoring. Precipitation was recorded at a number of locations across the watershed as well as logging of groundwater levels at 14 monitoring wells. A number of m Staff Report No. 26- 06 -BOD Page No. 2 of 3� File No. Agenda Item No. VI 7 BOD -05 -06 Biologic Indices were also collected including; fish populations, benthic communities and thermal stability of watercourses. The 2005 Environmental Monitoring Report presents a summary of the monitoring activities conducted by Authority staff and includes some initial observations of interesting data points. The report is intended as a yearly summary data report and presents the data in the context of 2005 not necessarily examining trends in individual data sets. In some cases, such as precipitation and surface water quantity, historic data was used to present 2005 conditions in a historical context. The Fish Habitat Map was also developed using historic data sets and is utilized in this report to determine the level of impairment for 2005 fish sampling sites. For other data sets, such as the Provincial Water Quality Monitoring Network, the examination of long term trends was beyond the scope of this report and water quality data was examined in the context of 2002 to 2005. The data described in this report will inevitably be used for a variety of other purposes and examination of long term trends for various data sets will likely be completed as stand alone products. A further intent of this report is to inform Authority partners and the public of the data that Is collected by the LSRCA and who to contact to obtain the data. This assists in avoiding duplication by partners and other agencies and improves data sharing. Issues: A number of issues were highlighted in the 2005 monitoring report, including: • A number of monitoring measures identified 2005 as an unusually dry year. These measures need to be closely followed in 2006 to see if this continues. Templates and graphs developed forthis report will greatly aid in improving the speed of interpretation. • Many of the same water quality issues raised in the 2004 monitoring report continued through 2005 with some parameters seeing dramatically increased concentrations. While further analysis showed that exceedences of chronic aluminum guidelines are not likely to be having toxic effects, exceedences of acute toxicity guidelines were recorded that may be having impacts. Phosphorus exceedences are still the most common with some stations exceeding phosphorus guidelines in every sample. Maskinonge river station showed a dramatic rise in iron and manganese concentrations over2004, while the Holland Landing station continues to be the most impacted station. • Toxic screening sampling in 2005 confirmed the presence of organochlorine (OC) pesticides in the Holland Marsh sediments as well as in water at levels exceeding applicable guidelines. While the sources of OC pesticides are likely historic, their presence in both sediment and waterwould indicate they a re still having a detrimental impact on the aquatic ecosystem. 93 s Staff Report No. Page No. File No. Agenda Item No. 26- 06 -BOD 3of3 VI 7 BOD -05 -06 • Eradication of a Round Goby population in Pefferlaw Brook was conducted in 2005 by the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources (OMNR) with Authority assistance. Continued monitoring will be ongoing in 2006 to insure this dangerous invasive species is no longer a threat to Lake Simcoe. The monitoring of the Pefferlaw Brook will be led by the OMNR. Impact on Authority Policy: Monitoring of water quantity and quality and biotic indexes is an important aspect of the Authority's performance measurement system. Impact on Authority Finances: This program is supported through provincial and municipal funding. Summary & Recommendations: It is recommended that Staff Report No. 26- 06 -BOD regarding the 2005 Environmental Monitoring Report be received for information, and FURTHER THAT the 2005 Environmental Monitoring Report be approved for release to Authority partners and general public. Pre ared by: 7s David Lembcke Environmental Monitoring Coordinator Reviewed Ofn`14 genbirk, for: ichael Walters, CMM 111 Director, Environmental Services A,— --�\ Approved for Board Review by: C', D. Gayle W oo CMM m Chief Administrative Officer Attachment(s): Lake Simcoe Watershed 2005 Environmental Monitoring Report S. \GeorginaOBOD Agenda Items \2 6 - 0 6 4101_2005 Moniionngftcpon.•.,pd 94 Staff Report No. Page No. File No. Agenda Item No. 26- 06 -BOD 3of3 VI 7 BOD -05 -06 • Eradication of a Round Goby population in Pefferlaw Brook was conducted in 2005 by the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources (OMNR) with Authority assistance. Continued monitoring will be ongoing in 2006 to insure this dangerous invasive species is no longer a threat to Lake Simcoe. The monitoring of the Pefferlaw Brook will be led by the OMNR. Impact on Authority Policy: Monitoring of water quantity and quality and biotic indexes is an important aspect of the Authority's performance measurement system. Impact on Authority Finances: This program is supported through provincial and municipal funding. Summary & Recommendations: It is recommended that Staff Report No. 26- 06 -BOD regarding the 2005 Environmental Monitoring Report be received for information, and FURTHER THAT the 2005 Environmental Monitoring Report be approved for release to Authority partners and general public. Pre ared by: 7s David Lembcke Environmental Monitoring Coordinator Reviewed Ofn`14 genbirk, for: ichael Walters, CMM 111 Director, Environmental Services A,— --�\ Approved for Board Review by: C', D. Gayle W oo CMM m Chief Administrative Officer Attachment(s): Lake Simcoe Watershed 2005 Environmental Monitoring Report S. \GeorginaOBOD Agenda Items \2 6 - 0 6 4101_2005 Moniionngftcpon.•.,pd 94 ru" WAR a • #6. IN c e � fu r. Im r — i Muir, all MOP n L � M1 i a TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 1 Introduction 2 Water Quantity 2.1 Precipitation 2.2 Stream Flow 2.3 Groundwater 2.5 Baseflow 3 Water Quality 3.1 Provincial Water Quality Monitoring Network 3.1.1 Aluminum Concentration Analysis 3.2 Lake Simcoe Environmental Management Strategy 3.3 Toxic Pollutant Screening Program 3.4 Lagoon City Nutrient Sampling 4 Biologic Indices 4.1 Fish Populations in the Streams of the Lake Simcoe Watershed 4.2 Benthic Communities of the Lake Simcoe Watershed 4.3 Invasive Species 4.4 Thermal Stability in the Lake Simcoe Watershed 4.5 Ecological Land Classification 5 Conclusion DISCLAIMER The material presented in this report is summary monitoring data and does not necessarily constitute policy or approved management priorities of the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation and /or the evaluation of the data and findings, should not be based solely on this specific report. Reference to equipment, brand names or suppliers in this report is not to be interpreted as an endorsement of that product or supplier by the authors. Executive Summary The Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority (LSRCA) is responsible for environmental monitoring, watershed planning, preservation and restoration of natural waters, lands and biota within the Lake Simcoe watershed. The LSRCA works with various partner agencies including Environment Canada, Natural Resources Canada, the Ministry of the Environment, the Ministry of Natural Resources, local and regional municipalities to better manage these challenging tasks. Environmental Monitoring activities include the monitoring of the quantity and quality of precipitation, river flow and groundwater, as well as biotic data sets including populations of fish and benthic invertebrates. These data sets are important for the analyses of contaminants, nutrient loading into Lake Simcoe, hydrological and hydraulic modelling, groundwater investigations, flood plain mapping and the general assessment of watershed health. Precipitation data from five rain gauges is displayed along with 30 -year normals from proximal stations to compare with low water indicators. The results of this show that precipitation amounts fell below low water indicator thresholds at all gauges for some months of 2005 with those gauges in the eastern portion of the watershed being more severely impacted. Stream flow data from 5 gauges is displayed along with historical monthly maximum, mean and minimums to compare with low water indicators. A further 3 stations are displayed compared to short term maximum, mean and minimums due to a lack of long term data at these stations. From comparisons with low water indicators it is apparent that all stations experienced low water conditions in mid to late summer with eastern stations being more severely impacted. Groundwater levels from 14 wells across the Watershed are displayed. Long term trends are not available for this data as monitoring began in 2001 or more recently. However, an examination of the whole network reveals that some of the lowest water levels were recorded in the spring of 2005 in shallow wells while deeper wells have not yet been affected by the dry spring conditions. In 2005 over 700 baseflow measurements were conducted in 12 Subwatersheds of the Lake Simcoe Watershed. As well monthly baseflow reference measurements were conducted at 8 sites to examine seasonal fluctuation in baseflow. The dry conditions of 2005 provided interesting baseflow conditions such as better highlighting gaining reaches and anthropogenic impacts but also resulted in a number of dry or standing reaches. Reference sites highlighted the importance of the Oak Ridges Moraine as a source of groundwater discharge to creeks during the dry months of summer. Water quality is assessed at 12 Provincial Water Quality Monitoring Network stations for 32 parameters. Phosphorus continues to be the most widespread and problematic pollutant in the rivers and streams of Lake Simcoe. Use of the federal unfiltered guideline for aluminum reveals that many stations are frequently exceeding the guideline. Further examination of aluminum concentrations suggest that the sampled concentrations may not be having toxic effects but that further research into aluminum toxicity is needed in Canada. The Holland Landing station is identified as the most impacted of the 12 stations while the Maskinonge station showed a dramatic rise in iron and manganese concentrations in 2005. Toxic Pollutant Screening sampling in 2005 confirmed the presence of Organochlorine pesticides sampled in the sediments Holland Marsh in 2004. While the sampled concentrations are likely the result of historical application, two pesticide metabolites were detected in water samples at concentrations exceeding the PWQO for the parent products. These water samples show that the OC Pesticides sampled in the sediments are mobile or are desorbing into surface waters and can be assumed to be having a negative impact on aquatic life. The 2005 sampling season was spent sampling the Lake Simcoe Environmental Management sites and sampling the two small subwatersheds of Bluff's Creek and Bogart Creek. Sampling was done using backpack Electro- Fishers following procedures outlined in the Stream Assessment Protocol for Southern Ontario Version 7 2005 (Stanfield 2005). Fifty species of fish were caught at 62 sampling sites over the 2005 sampling season. Two species of Special Concern were captured within the Lake Simcoe basin. Benthic samples were collected using the Ontario Benthic Biomonitoring Network (OBBN) Protocol (Jones 2005). Samples were collected in the spring and fall of 2005. The spring samples were identified to order level and the fall samples were identified to species and genus where possible. A total of 53 sites were sampled for benthic communities and were assessed using BioMAP (Bioassessment of Water Quality). To monitor stream water temperatures 80 electronic loggers were installed the watershed for the summer of 2005. They were installed in late May to early June and were retrieved late September to early October. The data is retrieved and compared with air temperature data over the same time period to identify warm, cool and cold streams. 1 Introduction The Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority (LSRCA) is responsible for environmental monitoring, watershed planning, preservation and restoration of natural waters, lands and biota within the Lake Simcoe watershed (Figure 1.1). The LSRCA works with various partner agencies including Environment Canada, Natural Resources Canada, the Ministry of the Environment, the Ministry of Natural Resources, local and regional municipalities to better manage these challenging tasks. The monitoring of environmental conditions across the watershed is carried out for a variety of purposes. Specifically, it is necessary for the evaluation of the quantity and quality of precipitation, river flow and groundwater, as well as biotic data sets including populations of fish and benthic invertebrates. These data sets are important for the analyses of contaminants, nutrient loading into Lake Simcoe, hydrological and hydraulic modelling, groundwater investigations, flood plain mapping and the general assessment of watershed health. This report is intended to provide a summary of the full set of data collected within the Lake Simcoe watershed in 2005. c� a� to f f s f 0 4 f 7 ►�' •►�.� fly f � V -- 1 -f coo � O O O _f .,..� v tj O � y V � � eS ow- U� CIO) 3 .. tj � y r ooh ! 400 _ _ ne7 Hwy 4� � o o v 1 c ct v v ct CIA ct o r � e e to f f s f 0 4 f 7 ►�' •►�.� fly f � V -- 1 -f coo � O O O _f .,..� v tj O � y V � � eS ow- U� CIO) 3 .. tj � y r ooh ! 400 _ _ ne7 Hwy 4� Hwy 4� 2 Water Quantity Water quantity monitoring includes the evaluation of precipitation, stream flow, baseflow and groundwater. These parameters are very useful when examining issues such as contaminant and nutrient loading to the lake, water availability for different kinds of consumption as well as anthropogenic impacts on water resources. Water quantity can be impacted by land use practices such as paving, clearing of land, groundwater withdrawals and alteration of river channels. Such changes in land use can lead to decreased infiltration rates, affecting groundwater recharge and increased runoff rates that increase the chances of downstream flooding. Groundwater withdrawal for urban, industrial or agricultural uses can also impact baseflow of local streams. 2.1 Precipitation Precipitation is measured by several agencies at a number of locations within the Lake Simcoe watershed. Information collected from those rain gauges is shared between agencies through various agreements. The LSRCA measures precipitation in Newmarket, Baldwin, Beaverton and a newly installed gauge in Schomberg using heated tipping bucket gauges. Heated gauges allow for year round monitoring to be conducted, however, they are subject to a greater margin of error for the measurement of snowfall versus rainfall. The Ministry of the Environment (MOE) maintains full meteorological stations in Scanlon Creek Conservation Area and in the Township of Ramara measuring precipitation, ultra- violet (UV) radiation, temperature, humidity, wind speed and wind direction. Environment Canada (EC) runs a number of stations within the Lake Simcoe watershed and also makes data available for stations no longer in operation. Some municipalities also monitor rainfall at various locations throughout their jurisdictions. In total the LSRCA operates or assists with the operation of six rain gauges. The following Figures 2.1 through 2.5 detail 2005 precipitation at five of these stations (Tabular data is displayed in Appendix A) and Figure 2.6 shows the locations of these stations. These figures also compare precipitation to low water indicators. This is done by comparing monthly data, seasonal (3 months of data) and long term (18 months of data) to long term normals from the station or a near by station. There are three levels of low water (1 to 3) with 3 being most severe. Low water indicators for precipitation used in conjunction with stream flow indicators are used to determine droughts and their severity in Ontario by the Ministry of Natural Resources and local Conservation Authorities. More information on these indicators and drought criteria can be found at http : / /www.mnr.gov.on.ca/mnr/Water/p774.html It is obvious when examining Figures 2.1 to 2.5 that 2005 was a dry year with many stations falling to levels 2 or 3 for monthly data, particularly in the months of March and May, and falling to level 1 or 2 in seasonal data. However, only stations to the east of the watershed, such as Ramara and Beaver, show long term precipitation levels falling below level 1. The severity of the low water levels for the Ramara and Beaver stations is also reflected in the monthly and seasonal precipitation data. This indicates that the eastern section of the Lake Simcoe Watershed was most affected by dry conditions. This is also reflected in the stream flow data discussed below. There were two noteworthy storm systems that caused flooding during the summer of 2005. The first storm on June 5th caused flooding in downtown Barrie and the second on August 19th caused major damage in Toronto washing out a section of Finch Avenue. The August 19th storm tracked south of the Oak Ridges Moraine and contributed little precipitation to the Lake Simcoe Watershed. The June 5th storm affected areas to the west of the watershed as well as downtown Barrie. The path of the storm was small and it was not caught by any LSRCA gauges, nor did it affect the Lovers Creek stream gauge in south east Barrie. These storms demonstrate the localized intensity summer storms can have as well as the importance of a well distributed gauge network. 1200 00-. E E 1000 0 350 300 U 250 n 200 150 100 50 0 Figure 2.1 - 2005 Baldwin Precipitation Gauge (Long Term Normals from Ravenshoe Gauge 1971 - 2000) 'I'I'I it �I ��IIII Milli Dil i - 2005 Monthly Rain 0 3 Month Total (Seasonal) 0 18 Month Total (Long Term) Level 2 (Monthly) Level 3 (Monthly) Level 1 (Seasonal) Level 2 (Seasonal) Level 1 (Long Term) Milli milli Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1200 00-. E E ca 800 •5 200 L 150 100 50 0 Figure 2.2 - 2005 Beaver Precipitation Gauge (Long Term Normals from Woodville Gauge 1971 - 2000) 2005 Monthly Rain 0 3 Month Total (Seasonal) 0 18 Month Total (Long Term) Level 2 (Monthly) Level 3 (Monthly) Level 1 (Seasonal) Level 2 (Seasonal) Level 3 (Seasonal) Level 1 (Long Term) Level 2 (Long Term) II � �I�I ll I ICI Inl �I II III�I �i ii�i�i �I � I�I� II II IIII II III III Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Figure 2.3 - 2005 Newmarket Precipitation Gauge (Long Term Normals from Sharon Gauge 1971 - 2000) izoo i000 a Zoa a iso ioa III j� 50 0 1111 IJ Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2005 Monthly Rain 0 3 Month Total (Seasonal) 0 18 Month Total (Long Term) Level 2 (Monthly) Level 3 (Monthly) Level 1 (Seasonal) Level 2 (Seasonal) Level 1 (Long Term) 1200 00-. E E ca 800 •5 200 aD L 150 100 50 0 J� Figure 2.4 - 2005 Ramara Precipitation Gauge (Long Term Normals from Woodville Gauge 1971 - 2000) 3n Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Figure 2.5 - 2005 Scanlon Precipitation Gauge (Long Term Normals from Bradford Gauge 1971 - 2000) izoa 1000 - zoo a iso ioo � n III n n� so �II1�1III 1711111 � 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2005 Monthly Rain 0 3 Month Total (Seasonal) 0 18 Month Total (Long Term) Level 2 (Monthly) Level 3 (Monthly) Level 1 (Seasonal) Level 2 (Seasonal) Level 3 (Seasonal) Level 1 (Long Term) Level 2 (Long Term) 2005 Monthly Rain 0 3 Month Total (Seasonal) 0 18 Month Total (Long Term) Level 2 (Monthly) Level 3 (Monthly) Level 1 (Seasonal) Level 2 (Seasonal) Level 1 (Long Term) II �� i,ii II III ni 11 1 3n Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Figure 2.5 - 2005 Scanlon Precipitation Gauge (Long Term Normals from Bradford Gauge 1971 - 2000) izoa 1000 - zoo a iso ioo � n III n n� so �II1�1III 1711111 � 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2005 Monthly Rain 0 3 Month Total (Seasonal) 0 18 Month Total (Long Term) Level 2 (Monthly) Level 3 (Monthly) Level 1 (Seasonal) Level 2 (Seasonal) Level 3 (Seasonal) Level 1 (Long Term) Level 2 (Long Term) 2005 Monthly Rain 0 3 Month Total (Seasonal) 0 18 Month Total (Long Term) Level 2 (Monthly) Level 3 (Monthly) Level 1 (Seasonal) Level 2 (Seasonal) Level 1 (Long Term) I JO O ct � o .� t U Ct Ct ct o t � N 9 � o O � �' -4C^ I I W J�J JJO I MMVVVV oJ cc '' 1 ^I � w O N U r�\ I JO O ct 2.2 Stream Flow In 2005 a total of eight flow monitoring stations were in operation within the Lake Simcoe watershed. Environment Canada operates four of them: East Holland River at Holland Landing, Schomberg River at Schomberg, Black River at Baldwin and Pefferlaw Brook at Udora. The remaining four are operated by the LSRCA: Tannery Creek in Aurora, Lovers Creek in Barrie, Uxbridge Brook at Davis Drive (downstream of Uxbridge), Beaver River at Concession 2 (in Brock Township) (Figure 2.7). All stations record river water levels continuously and the majority of them are remotely accessible by modem. Discharge is calculated using a rating curve that uses known discharge points and water levels to establish a relationship for the estimation of discharge. Stations maintained by the LSRCA have been quality checked and corrections applied to the data in this report. Stations maintained by Environment Canada have not yet been quality checked for 2004 and 2005. Minor changes may occur between the data presented here and the final data released by Environment Canada. Flow data for each of the stations is presented below in Figures 2.8 to 2.15. 2005 flow data is compared with historical maximum, minimum and mean values and where possible also compared to low water indicators. There are three low water levels, 1 to 3 with three being the most severe. The Ministry of Natural Resources and local Conservation Authorities use low water indicators in conjunction with precipitation indicators to determine droughts and their severity in Ontario. More information on these indicators and drought criteria can be found at http: / /www.mnr.gov.on.ca /mnr /water /p774.html � o c� � • a � •may N '� � � � � � a N Ct Ct H ct Ct PO +� p , �, ct �' •� ct N o Ct rr Ad N U v� r O . m r a ct r11 ct c c ct O bA n^ lV. ^/J Beaver River The Beaver River flow monitoring station, located on the 2nd Concession, southeast of Beaverton, records river water level continuously and is remotely accessible by modem. The station is currently maintained by the LSRCA and has been in operation since 1966. a� 0 M E d 100 10 0.1 0.01 Figure 2.8 - Beaver River (1966 -1993, 2002 -2005) Max Min - Mean 2004 ---*--2005 Level 1 Level 2 C -0 L- Q A C :3 0) U > U It is apparent from the above figure that the Beaver River experienced low water conditions from July through to October with the most severe conditions occurring in August. This corresponds with the low precipitation amounts noted at the Beaver and Ramara rain gauges. The period of low stream flow occurred through the typical summer baseflow period when a large portion of stream flow is the result of groundwater discharge. The exceptionally low precipitation levels recorded in March and May would have contributed little to groundwater aquifers resulting in lower groundwater contribution to summer baseflow and the low stream flows recorded July through October. Black River The Black River flow monitoring station located on Highway 48 in the hamlet of Baldwin, records river water level continuously and is remotely accessible by modem. The station is operated by Environment Canada and has been in operation from 1964 — 1969 and from 1983 to present. 0 U) c� E W 100 10 0.1 Fiaure 2.9 - Black River (1964 -1969. 1983 -20051 C � L L A C � Q U > U li � Q � Q cn 0 Z D The above figure illustrates that the Black River experienced low water conditions similar to those recorded at the Beaver River however not quite as severe. The months of July through to October fell into either a Level 1 or 2 low water condition with August recording the most severe low water. The March and October monthly values are of interest as the March value is close to being the lowest March value recorded, and October is the lowest October value recorded in the history of the station. As with the Beaver, the Black rain gauge recorded low precipitation amounts in March and May likely influencing the low stream flow recorded during the summer baseflow period. East Holland River The East Holland River flow monitoring station, located in Holland Landing, has been in operation since 1965. This station is operated by Environment Canada and is remotely accessible via modem. 0 V M E d 10 Figure 2.10 - East Holland River (1965 -2005) Max Min - NIPan 0.1 CU ' � Q � Q U) O z 0 The East Holland River also experienced low water conditions in 2005; however, it entered level 1 conditions in June, a month earlier than other stations in the Watershed. With the exception of September, the East Holland River was in a level 1 or 2 low water condition from June through to October. While this is not the most severe low water condition seen in the Watershed in 2005 it is among the longest in duration. Lovers Creek The Lovers Creek flow monitoring station in south east Barrie, has been operated by the LSRCA since 1998. It records water level continuously and is remotely accessible by modem. As only a short period of record is available it is not possible to calculate and compare to low water conditions. Comparison to maximum, minimum and mean values is displayed in Figure 2.11, however as this has been calculated from a relativity short time period it does not represent the full range of flow conditions Lovers Creek may experience. 0 U N M E a 10 0.1 0.01 Figure 2.11 - Lovers Creek 1998 -2005 L >+ Q U > U li 21-1 Q Q cn O Z 0 It is apparent from the above figure that dry conditions were not as severe at Lovers Creek compared other stations, particularly the dry conditions recorded in the eastern portion of the watershed. In fact some 2005 monthly values are the highest yet recorded since 1998 and none of the 2005 values are among the lowest recorded. Of particular interest is the intense localized storm on June 5t" that caused flooding in downtown Barrie but had a minimal effect on Lovers Creek approximately 4km to the south east. This can be seen above in the June monthly value and also the hourly logged water levels. It is estimated that 120mm of rain fell in just a couple of hours and yet only a modest rise in water levels was recorded at Lovers Creek. The event demonstrates the intensity and localization summer thunderstorms can have. Pefferlaw Brook The Pefferlaw Brook flow monitoring station is located at Udora downstream of the confluence of Pefferlaw and Uxbridge Brooks. The station is operated by Environment Canada and has been in operation since 1987. River water level is continuously recorded and is remotely accessible by modem. 100 a� 0 U) M E 10 0.1 Figure 2.12 - Pefferlaw Brook at Udora (1987 -2005) C M L L A C - 0) � U > U LL Q Q to o z 0 The Pefferlaw / Uxbridge Brook watershed lies directly west of the Beaver River Watershed. Like the Beaver, Pefferlaw experienced low water conditions starting in July but only lasting through August. It is interesting to note however that the monthly value recorded in August was the lowest value recorded for that month in the history of the station. Schomberg River The Schomberg River flow monitoring station is located in the upper part of the West Holland River subwatershed below the village of Schomberg. Environment Canada has been operating the station since 1966. The station records river level continuously and is remotely accessible by modem. a1 O N M E 10 0.1 0.01 Figure 2.13 - Schomberg River (1966 -1998, 2002 -2005) Max Min - - - Mean r) nnA L L >+ U > U a Q v, o z° o The Schomberg River also recorded low water level 1 conditions in July through to August. However, low water conditions for Schomberg in 2005 were not the most severe low water conditions recorded, as is the case with some other stations in 2005. In the above figure, the minimum monthly values ever recorded for July and September is 0.01 m3 /s. Tannery Creek The Tannery Creek flow monitoring station, located in Aurora, has been in operation since 2002. The Tannery Creek is a major tributary of the East Holland River and can be characterized as having a primarily urban catchment making it very quick to respond to storm events and remaining unfrozen throughout much of winter. The station is maintained by the LSRCA and is remotely accessible via modem. Due to the short period of record low flow conditions can not be calculated and minimum and maximum monthly values do not represent the range of flows likely to occur on the Tannery Creek. Comparison of 2005 monthly values with 2004 and mean monthly values show 2005 to be fairly similar to these two benchmarks. However, examination of long term records at the East Holland station downstream would suggest that these two years may be abnormally dry and not a good indicator of normal conditions at Tannery Creek. 0.8 0.6 M E 0.4 C1 0.2 Figure 2.14 - Tannery Creek - monthly values (2002 -2005) 0 Z 0 CU �i � Q ; Q cn O Z D Uxbridge Brook The Uxbridge Brook flow monitoring station at Davis Drive has been operated and maintained by the LSRCA since 2002. Using an ISCO logger, water level and average channel velocity are recorded and manually downloaded monthly. A rating curve is used to calculate flow from water level. 0.8 M E d 0.6 0.4 0.2 Figure 2.15 - Uxbridge Brook (2002 - 2005) AL 2004 f 2005 i � / e e / � e / � l O C A C: :3 0) � U > U � O `i 2-1 Q � Q c Z 0 Due to the limited period of record calculation of low water indicators is not possible and comparison to historical maximums and minimums is not meaningful. The data does show a period of low water from June through to October, however, the severity is difficult to judge. Precipitation and Stream Flow Conclusions As with precipitation, stream flow records have shown 2005 to be a very dry year. While low water indicators for precipitation were most severe in March and May, low stream flow occurred through the typical summer baseflow period. During this time of year a large portion of stream flow is the result of groundwater discharge. The exceptionally low precipitation levels recorded in March and May would have contributed little to groundwater aquifers likely causing lower groundwater contribution to summer baseflow and the low stream flows recorded July through October. As a result of the low water conditions the Lake Simcoe Watershed confirmed a Level 1 Low Water Status in August and remained in a Level 1 status through the remainder of 2005. For more information on Level 1 Low Water Conditions, including criteria and recommendations see http: / /www.mnr.gov.on.ca/MNR/Water/p774.html. As well as showing 2005 to be a dry year, precipitation and stream flow data show a disparity between the east and west portions of the Watershed. Precipitation data at the Beaver and Ramara stations particularly highlight this with the most months in a short term or seasonal low water condition, and the only stations with months in long term low water conditions. Low water stream flow conditions were also the most severe at the Beaver station. In contrast stream flow data from Lovers Creek show 2005 as a moderate year (based on the limited data set available at this station). Whether this disparity is a result of increasing or changing demands on water supply, changing climate patterns or changing land use will become an increasingly important question if this trend continues. 2.4 Groundwater Groundwater is an extremely important part of the hydrologic cycle. It is a substantial source of drinking water for various consumers and it plays an integral role in river ecosystems through baseflow discharge. The LSRCA, in cooperation with the Ministry of Environment, has developed and maintained a groundwater monitoring network that consists of 14 wells at 11 sites across the Lake Simcoe watershed (Figure 2.16). The purpose of the network is to monitor ambient groundwater conditions and, ultimately, evaluate long -term trends in groundwater levels and groundwater quality. Water levels are monitored continuously by dedicated pressure sensors in each well and are accessible via cellular modem. Well summary information is presented below in Table 2.1, monthly average water levels are presented in the figures below. Table 2.1 Lake Simcoe Watershed Groundwater Monitoring Wells Well ID Location Elevation Depth Average Static Water Level Operating Since (masl) (masl) (masl) W0000025 Queensville 265 255.22 262.74 2001 W0000032 Uxbridge 1 3591 323.81 325.75 2001 W0000039 Uxbridge 343 324.44 327.99 2001 W0000058 Alcona 226 211.67 223.81 2001 W0000062 Cannington 266 256.16 264.24 2001 W0000063 Holland Landing 224 208.3 220.63 2001 W0000071 Ballentrae 329 289.4 314.79 2001 W0000283 Aurora 279 250.498 273.81 2003 W0000293 -2 Baldwin 321 302.59 304.67 2003 W0000293 -3 Baldwin 321 294.25 304.70 2003 W0000298 -2 Baldwin 221 212.27 218.72 2003 W0000298 -3 Oro- Medonte 221 190.64 218.62 2003 W0000298 -4 Oro- Medonte 221 187.41 218.64 2003 W0000408 Ramara 226 212.5 2005 (masl - meters above sea level) 0293 -2/3 �r W058 1 ,4 0 Provincial Groundwater Monitoring Network - Figure 2.16 - Legend QQ PGMN Wells Watercourse Major Road Municipal Boundary The information depicted on this map has been compiled from various sources. While every effort has been made to accurately depict the information, g errors may data /ma in exist. p Y 0 This map has been produced for illustrative W063 purposes only. N 0 2.5 5 10 15 20 W032 W E W039 9 Kilometres s Scale: 1:425,000 Projection: NAD 83, UTM Zone 17N F' F� LSRCA GIS Services Created May 9, 2006 263.5 263 262.5 E ca E 262 261.5 L L >. C: 5 LL d 325.9 325.8 325.7 325.6 C6 Figure 2.17 -Well 025 (2001 -2005) Figure 2.18 - Well 032 (2001 -2005) U 'O Q cn z U m O Li Q Q [n z U 11 PAIM IM 327.75 O - L_ > O O) OL > U - , O O O LL 2-1 Q 2-1 Q n 0 z o 224.5 224.2 223.9 E 223.6 223.3 223 C .O LL Figure 2.19 -Well 039 (2001 -2005) Figure 2.20 - Well 058 (2001 -2005) m O_ m a) U O N Q 2! Q cn O z 0 265.2 264.7 264.2 E 263.7 263.2 Jan Feb Mar Figure 2.21 -Well 062 (2001 -2005) 221.2 221 220.8 220.6 E 220.4 220.2 220 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Figure 2.22 - Well 063 (2001 -2005) Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 315.1 315 314.9 314.8 ca E 314.7 314.6 314.5 ca Figure 2.23 - Well 071 (2001 -2005) -0000� - x i / / / — 2003 —0 2004 —�— 2005 --- mean 274.4 274.2 274 E 273.8 273.6 273.4 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec LL 2t Q 2t Q U) O Z 0 Figure 2.24 - Well 0283 (2003 -2005) 305.5 305.1 304.7 E 304.3 303.9 Figure 2.25 -Well 0293 -2 (2003 -2005) 305.2 305 304.8 E 304.6 304.4 304.2 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Figure 2.26 -Well 0293 -3 (2003 -2005) Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 219.5 219 218.5 E 218 217.5 217 219.3 218.9 218.5 m E 218.1 217.7 Figure 2.27 -Well 0298 -2 (2003 -2005) Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Figure 2.28 - W 0298 -3 (2003 -2005) Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 219.3 219 218.7 c� E 218.4 218.1 217.8 Jan Figure 2.29 - Well 0298 -4 (2003 - 2005) 219 218.5 218 ca E 217.5 217 216.5 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Figure 2.30 - Well 0408 (2005) Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Groundwater Level Summary As the period of record for all the monitoring wells is relatively short it is difficult to interpret 2005 water levels in a historical context or identify individual trends. However, taken as a whole there are some interesting observations that can be made from the data. Water levels in shallow wells (W025, W0627 W0293 -2 and W0298 -2) typically show a recovery period in spring (approximately March through June). This period in 2005 showed a number of months with the lowest recorded water levels. This is also the period of low precipitation identified in the 2005 precipitation records. For many of these wells low water levels continue through to the end of 2005. Low groundwater levels would also have an impact on river baseflow in summer when the one of the major sources of water to rivers is through groundwater discharge. This is demonstrated in the summer stream flow records where low water conditions occurred. The remaining wells (ranging in depth from 15 to 35 meters) also show cyclic annual fluctuations in water levels. The timing of these fluctuations varies based on factors such as depth and overburden material (soil type). Of note is that 2005 does not necessarily show up as the driest year on record in some of the deeper wells. Due to the slow process of ground water infiltration it is likely that the low water conditions of 2005 will not be reflected in the deeper well water levels until 2006 or later. 2.5 Baseflow Measurement Flow in a stream or river can be roughly divided into high and low flow conditions. High flow is due to snow melt or runoff from a rain event and as such will have higher water levels and velocities. It is under these conditions that flooding and higher erosion rates would occur. Low flow is maintained by groundwater seeps, wetlands, and ponds that release water over time. The majority of the time a river will be in low flow or "baseflow" conditions. It is not uncommon that during long periods of baseflow (i.e. mid to late summer) sections of stream may go dry. It is also during these periods that water taking can have the greatest impact on the amount of stream flow. During the summer of 2005, over 700 baseflow discharge measurements were conducted in 12 subwatersheds throughout the greater Lake Simcoe watershed. Baseflow conditions were defined as a period of no precipitation longer than 72 hours. To ensure that all points collected within a watershed were comparable, an entire watershed or reach would be completed in the same baseflow period. Discharge measurements were conducted at road crossings for ease of access, providing a suitable cross - section could be found. Measurements were done following Environment Canada measurement standards for the area - velocity method. However, where conditions permitted, a timed bucket method was used instead. In order to examine and compare baseflow discharge measurements throughout a reach the measurements and associated stream segments were converted to liters per second per kilometer units. This was done by determining the difference between upstream and downstream discharge (downstream discharge minus upstream discharge) in liters /second and dividing that by the length of stream segment separating the two points. A positive number shows gains in flow along that stretch of river while a negative number show loss in flow. The results can be seen in Figure 2.31. For comparison 2004 baseflow results have been similarly displayed in Figure 2.32. Baseflow Summary As has been noted in previous sections, 2005 experienced unusually dry conditions making for atypical baseflow conditions. Streams found to be standing or dry in 2005 may flow continuously through a more typical year. This was particularly pronounced in Whites Creek and the Ramara Drains, virtually all of which were found to be dry or standing. Water losses in a system may also be due to anthropogenic impacts, such as water taking for agriculture, which would also be amplified in a dry year. Anthropogenic impacts are difficult to separate from natural processes therefore tributaries shown as losing reaches or dry may be a result of one or the other or a combination of both. �k, 2005 Base Flow - Figure 2.31 - Legend Base Flow (L /s /km) < -20 -10 to -20 -5 to -10 -0.01 to -5 0.01 to 5 5 to 10 10 to 20 20 to 30 >30 Dry, Standing or Too Low No Data Oak Ridges Moraine The information depicted on this map has been compiled from various sources. While every effort has been made to accurately depict the information, data /maping errors may exist. This map has been produced for illustrative purposes only. N 0 2.5 5 10 15 20 W* E !T Kilometres S Scale: 1:425,000 Projection: NAD 83, UTM Zone 17N LSRCA GIS Services Created May 2, 2006 i f s i ,� ► ti Lr '' w, t w 2004 Base Flow - Figure 2.32 - Legend Base Flow (L /s /km) -10 .0 to -20.0 -5.0 to -10 -0.01 to -1.0 0.01 to 1.0 1.1 to 5.0 5.1 to 10.0 10.1 to 20.0 >20.0 Dry, Standing or Too Low No Data Oak Ridges Moraine The information depicted on this map has been compiled from various sources. While every effort has been made to accurately depict the information, data /maping errors may exist. This map has been produced for illustrative purposes only. N 0 2.5 5 10 15 20 W* E !T Kilometres S Scale: 1:425,000 Projection: NAD 83, UTM Zone 17N LSRCA GIS Services Created May 2, 2006 Anthropogenic impacts may also manifest in a tributary as a gaining reach. These are typically easier to identify than water taking impacts as there are fewer of them. In a dry year like 2005 these impacts will be clearer as they will be contributing a greater percentage of the total baseflow. Two examples that stand out in 2005 are the high gaining reaches to the west of Mt Albert and north central of the Town of Uxbridge. Both these reaches receive water from the local waste water treatment facility which is the likely cause of the water gains in these tributaries. Another result of the dry conditions noted in 2005 would be that for many tributaries, groundwater discharge would comprise a greater percentage of total baseflow. This would show itself in a greater number and intensity of gaining reaches. Comparing 2004 data to 2005 this is evident in the headwaters of the Black River and Pefferlaw Brook as well as Bluffs Creek near Orillia. The Oak Ridges Moraine shows up as a major source of baseflow discharge as evidenced in the headwaters of Uxbridge Brook, Pefferlaw Brook and the Black River. Compared with the 2004 data for Pefferlaw Brook and the Black River a similar pattern of high discharge tributaries can be seen on the northern flank of the Oak Ridges Moraine. Interestingly a pattern of loosing reaches can also be observed in many of these same tributaries just north of the Moraine. Reference Sites Baseflow discharge for any system will vary over the course of a season. Higher baseflow is typical of spring and fall and lower baseflow in mid to late summer. In order to better quantify this fluctuation a number of references sites were set up in the watershed and monthly baseflow measurements were conducted. Sites were selected on the Oak Ridges Moraine that were known to have significant ground water contributions as well as other locations in the watershed where groundwater discharge was minimal but the tributary was thought to run year round. Of the 8 reference sites 3 did go dry. One site was dry throughout the entire summer the other 2 were dry for the August and September measurements. Figure 2.33 and 2.34 below, show baseflow measurements at three reference sites that ran through the entire season. Ref 1, located in Innisfil Creeks, shows a marked drop in discharge for the August and September measurements (97% drop from spring flow). Sites Ref 8 and Ref 9 are located on the Black River and Pefferlaw Brook respectively. A large portion of baseflow at these sites is comprised of groundwater discharge and therefore the seasonal variation is not as pronounced (26% and 16% drop from spring flow respectively). Figure 2.34 - Ref Site 8 and Ref Site 9 80 70 60 50 ci p Ref 8 E 40 ■ Ref 9 C) 30 20 10 0 May June Aug Sept Oct Nov 3. Water Quality The chemical, physical and microbiological characteristics of natural water make up an integrated index we define as "water quality ". Water quality is a function of both natural processes and anthropogenic impacts. For example, natural processes such as weathering of minerals and various kinds of erosion are two that can affect the quality of groundwater and surface water. There are also several different types of anthropogenic influences such as point source and non - point sources of pollution. For example, point sources of pollution are direct inputs of contaminants to the surface water or groundwater system and include things such as municipal and industrial wastewater discharges, ruptured underground storage tanks, and landfills. Non -point sources include, but are not exclusive to, agricultural drainage, urban runoff, land clearing, construction activity and land application of waste that typically travel to waterways through surface runoff and infiltration. Contaminants delivered by point and non -point sources can travel in suspension and /or solution and are characterized by routine sampling of surface waters in the Lake Simcoe watershed. There were a number of monitoring programs operating in 2005 conducting observations of water quality in rivers, reservoirs and lakes within the Lake Simcoe watershed. Among them: the Provincial Water Quality Monitoring Network (PWQMN), Lake Simcoe Environmental Management Strategy (LSEMS), Toxic Pollutants Screening Program (TPSP) and other small scale, project specific programs. The PWQMN and LSEMS programs observe long- term changes and therefore run every year. The TPSP and other project specific tasks have more clearly defined objectives and are short term in nature. 3.1 Provincial Water Quality Monitoring Network 2005 Within the Lake Simcoe Watershed there are 12 PWQMN stations located on all major rivers Figure 3.1. Overall, 95 samples were taken in 2005 with samples taken 8 times a year on a monthly basis during the ice -free period. Each sample, analyzed for 32 chemical parameters in the Laboratory Services Branch of the Ministry of Environment, is assessed using the Provincial Water Quality Objectives (PWQO) (Ministry of Environment, 1994). As stated by the Ministry of Environment, the goal of the PWQO is to protect and preserve aquatic life and to protect the recreational potential of surface waters within the province of Ontario. Meeting the PWQO is generally a minimum requirement, as one has to take into account the effects of multiple guideline exceedences, overall ecosystem health, and the protection of site - specific uses. In instances where a chemical parameter is not included in the PWQO, the Canadian Water Quality Guidelines for the Protection of Aquatic Life (CWQG) was applied (Environment Canada, 2003). The CWQG were developed by the Environmental Quality Branch of Environment Canada to protect aquatic species by establishing acceptable levels for substances that affect water quality and are based on toxicity data for the most sensitive species found in streams and lakes of Canada. � o N Qj •� tt !� ct 7:$ U 42 o N ct aA ct 00 u ct r •� ct •� O ct �^ Ct O O �x C5 ct 4J U bJJ 3 m �••u O ct c ct ct O It should be noted that in order for summary statistics to be reliable, a data set of 30 points within a 5 -year period is recommended. Presently, 22 — 25 points have been taken for the period of 2002 to 2005. Comparison with data prior to 2002 is difficult as there is a gap in the data back to 1995. At this time 17 chemical parameters of the 32 analyzed have guidelines attached to them and according to analytical results 12 of those 17 parameters have recorded exceedences during this time. The following paragraphs highlight some of the more interesting results of 2005. A summary table of stations and parameters with guidelines from 2002 to 2005 can be found in Table 3.1 below. A summary of common sources of the parameters sampled under the PWQMN program can be found in Appendix B. Figures 3.2 through 3.9 display mean concentrations and number of guideline exceedences for a number of parameters of interest. Total Phosphorus continues to be the most problematic contaminant in rivers of the Lake Simcoe Watershed, exceeding the PWQO 75% of the time basin wide in 2005. Total Phosphorus exceeds the PWQO in all samples taken from the West Holland River, East Holland River, Upper Schomberg River and Maskinonge River. Hawkestone Creek in Oro - Medonte had the lowest number of exceedences with 3 (12 %) of 8 samples taken. The second most widespread pollutant is Aluminum, which exceeded the CWQG 33 % of the time in 2005. In the 2004, Monitoring Report (LSRCA, 2004) Aluminum concentrations under the PWQMN program were found to be regularly above the CWQG at a number of stations. As a result, additional statistical analyses and sampling of Aluminum concentrations were conducted in 2005. Results of this effort are detailed below. A number of other metals were sampled at concentrations above guidelines in 2005. Iron exceeds the PWQO in 40% of the 2005 samples basin wide. Levels at Holland Landing and Maskinonge exceed the PWQO in 7 out of 8 samples. Cobalt, which generally does not occur in natural waters over a few ug /L, exceeded guidelines in 8% of the samples taken basin wide. Lead, whose primary use in Canada is in the production of acid storage batteries, had exceedences at Holland Landing, Tannery and Uxbridge. Cadmium, which had exceedences in 23% of samples taken in 2004, had none in 2005. During 2005, one sample exceeded the guideline for Chloride at Holland Landing. The guideline of 210mg /L (Canadian Environmental Protection Act) is a measure of toxicity related to chronic exposure. The United States EPA uses a guideline of 860 mg /L as a measure of acute toxicity during aone -hour exposure. Under the Lake Simcoe Environmental Management Strategy (LSEMS) program one exceedence of this guideline was reported between 2002 to 2005 at the Holland Landing station in February 2004. Using LSEMS data, it is apparent that high levels of chloride are most common through the winter months likely due to the use of road salt. This seasonality is apparent in Figure 3.10 below excluding C a I` o N 0 0 0 a M m N 0\ O a ^ o "'O 0 0\ 0 0 O 0 0 O LO \ M N N N a) L Q] Q ° > a) C L 0) Q CO 'i 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 N N 0 0 N (D 0 0 X N M M M J Q) > cu m 0 o O cu _ >, a) U O L M co \ \ d U W Ln C \ a) 0 = 0 0 0 0 CO O 00 CO O N 0 C)o 0 0 0 m m N O L = O E � O N N o I i 0 c O o O E 0 0 0 0� 0 0 0 0 O O CO V O M CO \ Lo 0 > (D cu U a) x L C a) -0 E L N � m cu > L o C2 0) m ° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 co 0 0 0000 m O CD a N LII L I CD Q) N N M M m °O O C C L Q \ \ \ V L- CO a N 000,1- tB Ol- O N M 0 OO O O O O LO CU C m a) O I "_ O N Q) L N C O Y O O O a) Q] O ° O }d}.� VI O S C"') 0 0 0 N O N O C"M 0 0 0 0 O O 00 Q' Lf� L0 loo� Q � N N L� LO O 0 C uw N O > \ \ \ L O — C A Y C U) C� �O M 0 N > co 0 0 0 CM C C O N O M 0000 a) O O 0 0 \ O J CO c r M N C C CU O r (LQ m OL O Z) O O N CC) O O N o CC) C J C O O O O O m CD J 0 000 CO O M 0 0, Q CC) = N � m +� Q) [0 M Nt 00 N N J. co C U) 70 CU C CQ J N N O 2 2 ca - -0 � 2 L1J O �O (n C Q O O U Q J o � cu a) Q ( Q) d i 0 a o o c c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 O > > CB C I U) O U) M L Q) "' M 2 O W U) Q) L O U) u) a) .— U) C U U) cu C a) Y C U) C M CB o O Q) C L U X U) - N O Q 4— a) � ( .L O C (Q C2 � U) .E N U Y 0 O �C \° 0 V m O 0 0 CC) 0 O O N o N N M 0000 o co O m N X L u � LO IllC10 M •0) Q) 2 ED ON O O O N; N m M O O O � O N O O O O N O O m co ca Qmmt)t) co I` O O V U �:2zzCL == CO L Y J : J � J CM J \ W E = d) 5 d) � :3 E i 0 () 0 O 0 0 N O O 0 LO O 0 0 I O N :3 :3 O O m O m co m N • N O O CO co :3 N O O N E N E ca E E � = i O E E E E � E O E � E .� .� E ca a — � m a N ca ca 'i E ca i d ca s 0 t= 0 0 �' d 0 V .- - O .- S r- u ca ._ a aammL) L) L) 0 iJ2Z za >N U t� cu (1) L O Q- U E X 0) O C Q] > cu U U (0 O CQ Q) t� U (0 aj a) L Q] Q > a) C L 0) Q E En O Q L O � U En O > U) Q] L 0 � U _ a) � C2 X cu O C 4- O E J Q) > cu m 0 o O cu _ >, a) U O L � L O En d U W Ln C cu 0) L O -0 E O U X O C� — J U_ C O O LO O O U U) (0 cu L = O E � O N C E O Q) =_ UM ) LO U �C O C O a) N C2 Cn C 0 0 > (D cu U a) x L C a) -0 E L � J � m cu > L o C2 0) m (Q O = CD O O -0 N O L L L O E E U) U -a 2 Q] cm > LII L I CD Q) O :3 (6 � Q L L 70 'L �n U) a) [6 �--. J tB O C C L Q N C C CU a) ~ C/) o O •L U C2 O -a Q) C V L- M � O O 2 cn tB U LO C C\Q > N LO L o CD N rn ) O Q) En >' co a) > a) 0) O C Q) 0) CU C m a) O I "_ Q) Q' O CA Q) L 0 a) L �_ C O Y X O a) Q] U) a) O cm O O cu O CD L s_ G "- C L- _ Q) >, N 'C — � -0 Q) L O C N O �O > Q) LO X O Q' -0 a) -0 4) Q a J U CM > Lo O CD O 0) N C N L� LO O 0 C uw N O > > a) O 0 L O — C A Y C U) C� �O M C6 U) CM � a) U a) M a) o CM C C O L CM a) C a) O C Q) J O c o C C Y -0 o E C C C CU J O (0 > CU O ui M (LQ m OL O Z) w U) M w a) CZ M U) � a) C J C C C Q) cu U) > Q C O -0 C J C = (6 � 0-- Q C Y C C (0 (5 m +� Q) [0 _ cu O D U) O) cu Q c6 70 O L U) � C O OL C.) O to N:3 _0 o co C U) 70 CU C CQ J 70 C) C :3 o C 70 � C 2 ca - -0 � 2 L1J O �O (n C Q O O U Q J o � cu a) Q ( Q) L L a) a:3 U) L � CU (D Yo _ a 17E) _ U) a > Q`n - > O > > CB C I U) O U) L Q) "' O W U) Q) L O U) u) a) .— U) C U U) cu C a) a) C U) C M CB O a) C > O Q) C L U X U) - N O Q 4— a) � ( .L O C (Q C2 � U) .E N U Y CO L- to cu U) O C2 C2 (� QC) .� C L N O C X .� a) U) L N 0 �_ O j O 70 C U C 70 0 a) L > >, U CA .0 � Q) 2 i> C2 cu tB Y L Q) Q) (Q cu X L u O O [Q Q� Q) a) L1J > L- Q cl Cn •0) Q) 2 ED Q •� Cn 2 O O O N; N E O i _ i •E L Q i cv a) = L COL. L O O z C = ca Qmmt)t) O ca O O V U �:2zzCL == L L Y c4 bD O I I O d a I � o ' , t 4 o a o O � N N N o Ct H ^ ct Ct ct •� ct aj W 4� M� � c �.. / O �..� o H v a� . � bD O I I O d a I bA O N a W U 4 Ac, ,o 0 1 t ML A R � o v , v a are N 4� + ct 4� N n O O 4:; p o bA O N a W U 4 Ac, ,o 0 1 t ML A R 7-, M PWQO = 5µg/ Copper 2002-2005 - Figure 3.5 - %:- I \ 'Oel I e ILegend Guideline Exceedences (% of samples) j wN 8% Concentration 'A (Trim mean) (�tg/L) Lh The information depicted on this map has been compiled from various sources. While every effort has been made to accurately depict the information, data /maping errors may exist. This map has been produced for illustrative purposes only. N 0 2.5 5 10 15 20 W E Kilometres S Scale: 1:425,000 Projection: NAD 83, UTM Zone 17N 5 LSRCA GIS Services Created May 2, 2006 PWQO = 5µg/ Lead 2002-2005 - Figure 3.6 - Legend Guideline Exceedences (% of samples) CO 16% 0% Concentration (Trim mean) (µg /L) 0 0.0 - <0.5 This map has been produced for illustrative purposes only. N 0 2.5 5 10 15 20 W E Kilometres S r Scale: 1:425,000 r Projection: NAD 83, UTM Zone 17N LSRCA GIS Services Created May 2, 2006 O 0.5 - <1.0 0 1.0 - <1.5 x 0 = 1.5 - 2.0 The information depicted on this map has been compiled from various sources. While every effort has been made to accurately depict the information, data /maping errors may exist. This map has been produced for illustrative purposes only. N 0 2.5 5 10 15 20 W E Kilometres S r Scale: 1:425,000 r Projection: NAD 83, UTM Zone 17N LSRCA GIS Services Created May 2, 2006 7-, M 3 CWQG = 2.9 µg/ Nitrate 2002 -2005 - Figure 3.7 - %:- I \ 'Oel I e ILegend Guideline Exceedences (% of samples) j MM 9% This map has been produced for illustrative purposes only. N 0 2.5 5 10 15 20 W* E !T Kilometres S Scale: 1:425,000 Projection: NAD 83, UTM Zone 17N LSRCA GIS Services Created May 2, 2006 0% Concentration (Trim mean) (mg /L) f 0 0.0 - <0.5 f O 0.5 - <1.0 0 1.0 - <1.5 0 1.5 - 2.0 The information depicted on this map has been compiled from various sources. While every effort has been made to accurately depict the information, data /maping errors may exist. This map has been produced for illustrative purposes only. N 0 2.5 5 10 15 20 W* E !T Kilometres S Scale: 1:425,000 Projection: NAD 83, UTM Zone 17N LSRCA GIS Services Created May 2, 2006 { 0 rwQo = so µg /y� phosphorus 2002-2005 - Figure 3.8 - Legend Guideline Exceedences (% of samples) wN 100% 0.12% Concentration (Trim mean) (µg /L) 0 0.0 - <35.0 O 35.0 - <70 O 70.0 - <105.0 0 105.0 -140.0 The information depicted on this map has been compiled from various sources. While every effort has been made to accurately depict the information, data /maping errors may exist. This map has been produced for illustrative purposes only. N 0 2.5 5 10 15 20 W* E !T Kilometres S Scale: 1:425,000 Projection: NAD 83, UTM Zone 17N LSRCA GIS Services Created May 2, 2006 7-, M P".w Mail 3 0 No Applicable Guidelin Total Suspended Solids 2002-2005 - Figure 3.9 - Legend Concentration (Trim mean) (mg /L) 0 0.0 - <10.0 O 10.0 - <20.0 O >_20.0 The information depicted on this map has been compiled from various sources. While every effort has been made to accurately depict the information, data /maping errors may exist. This map has been produced for illustrative purposes only. N L 0 2.5 5 10 15 20 W E Kilometres Scale: 1:425,000 Projection: NAD 83, UTM Zone 17N LSRCA GIS Services Created May 2, 2006 2005 LSEMS data. The PWQMN program misses these high winter chloride concentrations, as sampling is restricted to the ice -free period of the year. 1400 1200 1000 800 J E 600 400 200 0 O� oX Figure 3.10 - Chloride Concentrations (Holland Landing) Off' 00' On' Off` Off` O� O� OHO Nitrite exceeded the PWQO at three locations in 2005 — Maskinonge, Schomberg and Uxbridge. Nitrite is short lived and is most likely indicative of a nearby source. Levels at the Maskinonge peaked at 2 to 3 times the guideline in late summer and early fall in 2004 and 2005. Total Chromium as measured by the PWQMN is not directly comparable to PWQO for hexavalent and trivalent Chromium, the two forms most common in natural waters. However, Total Chromium recorded at Holland Landing is chronically above expected levels for natural waters as well as having multiple readings in excess of the objectives for both the trivalent and hexavalent forms. A number of other stations recorded periodic spikes above levels expected for natural waters and the criteria for trivalent and hexavalent Chromium. The most heavily impacted station is Holland Landing; recording numerous exceedences of 11 of the 17 parameters that have firm guidelines. This included 100% of Phosphorus samples, 96% of Aluminum and 84% of Iron samples. Uniquely high readings of Aluminum and Chloride, in excess of the US EPA's guidelines for acute toxicity, were also recorded. Acutely toxic guidelines are set to protect freshwater aquatic organisms from negative impacts if exposed to that concentration for one hour in a three -year period. Tannery is also a heavily impacted station, mimicking much of what goes on at Holland Landing, but to a lesser degree. The Tannery station is upstream of the Holland Landing station this indicates that the factors causing the exceedences at Holland Landing are wide spread throughout the system. There have been some interesting changes occurring at the Maskinonge station during 2005. The most notable is the dramatic and consistent rise of Manganese and Iron as illustrated below in Figure 3.11. Elevated levels of Manganese are usually associated with industrial discharges and Iron, an abundant heavy metal, is usually found at low levels because of its relatively low solubility when pH exceeds seven. Levels of Iron and Manganese found at the Maskinonge in 2005 are two to three times levels found at the same site from 2002 — 2004. Iron levels exceeded PWQO for 7 out of eight samples during 2005 while Iron exceeded guidelines only once from 2002 — 2004. These parameters will be closely observed in the coming years to determine if the values recorded in 2005 are an anomaly or an emerging trend. 1.1 0.9 0.7 J E _ O 0.5 0.3 0.1 GG O Figure 3.11 - Iron - Manganese (Maskinonge 2003 - 2005) -Iron Manganese Iron PWQO Off` s$ SJ� P << 5 � 0.7 0.6 0.5 J 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 N Aluminum at the Maskinonge River station has also shown an elevation in readings during 2005. Aluminum toxicity is a complex topic and further information is available later in under Aluminum Concentrations Analysis. Data suggests that for most stations particulate matter may be the primary source of Aluminum. While the river recorded a moderate number of exceedences in comparison with other stations (8 of 22 samples), further analysis of the data suggests that other factors then particulate matter may be influencing aluminum concentrations in the Maskinonge. 3.1.1 Aluminum Concentrations Analysis In the 2004 Monitoring Report (LSRCA, 2004) Aluminum concentrations under the Provincial Water Quality Monitoring Network (PWQMN) regularly exceeded the Canadian Water Quality Guideline (CWQG) at a number of stations. As a result of this, additional analysis of Aluminum concentrations, as well as additional sampling, was conducted in 2005. Samples collected under the PWQMN are unfiltered and as a result, are not comparable to the PWQO. The CWQG was used instead as it relates to total recoverable Aluminum. However, both the CWQG and filtered Provincial Water Quality Guideline (PWQO) are currently being reviewed. The US EPA aluminum guidelines are 87 ug /L for chronic and 750 ug /L for acute toxicity (one hour) in unfiltered samples (US EPA, 2006). The US EPA does note that Aluminium is significantly less toxic at higher pH and hardness but that this relationship is not well understood at this time. US EPA tests have indicated that total recoverable Aluminum is a more appropriate measurement than dissolved. In surface waters, however, the total recoverable procedure might measure aluminum associated with clay particles, which might be less toxic than aluminum associated with aluminum hydroxide (US EPA, 2006). This indicates that total recoverable aluminum may be a more appropriate measure when particulate aluminum is primarily comprised of aluminum hydroxide, however less effective when the aluminum is associated with clay particles. It is therefore possible that surface water samples that exceed the total (unfiltered) aluminum guidelines are not being impacted by aluminum. Further research is needed to better understand the thresholds of aluminum toxicity and factors that affect it. In the meantime these guidelines are best used as a starting point for further investigation. In 2005 aluminum concentrations followed the same trend as 2004, however, September samples revealed the highest concentrations in the 2002 to 2005 data set, two of which exceeded the US EPA acute toxicity guideline. Historically aluminum was only sampled as part of the PWQMN in 1994 -1995 at select stations (Maskinonge however was sampled from 1987 - 1995). In the historic data set 1 exceedence of the EPA acute toxicity guideline was reported at Aurora and 3 at Maskinonge. This could suggest that the concentrations currently observed are not due to recent land use changes or input sources but rather have been occurring for at least a decade or more. To better understand the composition of the aluminum concentrations in the East Holland River a series of filtered and unfiltered samples were collected. The results of this revealed all but one station exceeding the federal unfiltered guideline and one exceedence of the EPA acute toxicity guideline in unfiltered samples. However, all filtered samples reported a non - detect except for one, which was well below the PWQO filtered sample guideline. This would suggest that the aluminum being detected in PWQMN samples is in particulate form or associated with clay particles. As highlighted by the US EPA work, this unfortunately does not clarify the degree of toxicity associated with the sampled total aluminum concentrations. To understand the composition of aluminum samples at other PWQMN stations with exceedences, results were correlated with total suspended solids (TSS) at these stations. The expectation is that where concentrations of aluminum and TSS mirror each other the majority of sampled aluminum will be associated with clay particles due to erosion or resuspension of bed load. Indeed the stations with the greatest number of aluminum exceedences yielded R2 values from 0.92 to 0.97 (Tannery, Schomberg, Holland Landing and Beaver). Stations with a moderate number of aluminum exceedences had R2 values of 0.78 and 0.86 (Hwy 11 and Lovers respectively). These values indicate a strong correlation between aluminum and TSS at these stations. Correlation between iron and aluminum and iron and TSS was also conducted and showed significant correlation. This suggests that iron and aluminum are coming from the same source, being erosion or resuspension of bed load as they both correlate well with TSS. The Maskinonge River station however, does not show the same strong relationship between aluminum and TSS as with other stations. While it recorded a moderate number of exceedences (8 of 22 samples) the correlation yielded a R2 value of 0.53. Historic aluminum and TSS data, which is better for the Maskinonge than at other stations (1987 - 1995), also shows a weaker correlation (R2 = 0.64). While this still indicates that TSS is in part responsible for the aluminum concentrations being sampled, it suggests that there are other factors that may be influencing aluminum concentrations. Sediment samples were also collected at most PWQMN sites to examine the composition of stream bed sediments as a possible source of the sampled aluminum concentrations. These samples showed aluminum and iron to be the most abundant in bed sediments. This would further strengthen the suggestion that the aluminum being sampled is a result of bed load resuspension or upstream erosion. Many of these streams that are recording frequent high aluminum concentrations are indeed very flashy in nature or highly prone to erosion (Tannery Creek, Holland Landing, Hwy 11, Lovers) providing the mechanism for erosion and resuspension. 3.2 Lake Simcoe Environmental Management Strategy One of the objectives of Lake Simcoe Environmental Management Strategy (LSEMS) is to identify sources and to measure the amount of phosphorus entering Lake Simcoe. Monitoring activity plays an important role in accomplishing this goal. Environmental monitoring data also provide scientists and resource managers with information to develop strategies and remedial action plans to address ecosystem health concerns. Monitoring activities including surface water sampling, flow monitoring and meteorological monitoring are carried out across the watershed to support the LSEMS initiative. Recently LSEMS monitoring data for the years 1998 to 2004 was compiled to generate a water balance, phosphorus, nitrogen and chloride loads for the entire Lake Simcoe Watershed. The results of which are published in a soon to be released report titled "Annual Water Balances, Total Phosphorus Budgets and Total Nitrogen, Chloride Loads for Lake Simcoe" (Scott, et al, 2005). 3.3 Toxic Pollutant Screening Program As anthropogenic impacts on the Lake Simcoe watershed increase, it is probable that, along with nutrients, concentrations of toxic pollutants in surface water and sediments in rivers and lakes could increase to unacceptable levels. Due to the increasing anthropogenic effects on surface water and sediments within the watershed, it is important to monitor contaminant concentrations. To this end the LSRCA initiated a Toxic Pollutant Screening Program in 2004 to evaluate the conditions of rivers and streams with regard to the presence of selected organic and inorganic contaminants in surface water and sediments. (LSRCA, 2004) The full report can be viewed here: http: / /www.Isrca.on.ca /Monitoring /ToxicScreening. html In 2005 the program focused on confirmatory sampling of organochlorine (OC) pesticides detected in the Holland Marsh. In 2004, OC pesticides were initially detected only in the sediment sample collected from TS -7 located in the West Holland River in Bradford (north of Holland Marsh). Concentrations of DDT and DDE were significant enough to justify the collection of samples from five additional stations, located upstream of TS -7, to facilitate the delineation of the impacts. OC pesticides, which have largely been banned in Canada due to their environmental persistence, were detected in the 2004 marsh sediment samples at orders of magnitude higher than the applicable aquatic guidelines. Due to the persistent nature of these pesticides, the concentrations sampled likely indicate historic use; however, their presence in surface sediments represents a potential source of contamination to aquatic receptors and may result in bioaccumulation in aquatic and human receptors. Sediment was sampled at the same five sites as 2004 with the addition of water quality samples. Analytical results of OC Pesticides for 2004 and 2005 are displayed in Tables 3.2 and 3.3 below. Results for 2005 were very similar to 2004 in terms of concentrations sampled. DDT and its metabolites were again sampled at levels greatly exceeding guidelines. Aldrin was also sampled at one station exceeding applicable guidelines. All the pesticides detected in 2005 are now banned in Canada except Endosulfan Sulfate, which is a metabolite of Endosulfan. A notable difference from 2004 is that a- Chlorane, Dieldrin, a- Endosulfan and b- Endosulfan were not detected. However, these are persistent pesticides and it is unlikely that they have disappeared since 2004. It is more likely that they have either been transported, buried or are absent in the sample because of the limitations of the equipment and methodologies used. Dieldrin in particular is a metabolite of Aldrin, which was detected, and therefore it is very likely to still be present. Similarly Endosulfan Sulfate (which was detected) is a metabolite of Endosulfan suggesting that Endosulfan is likely still present in the environment. If any more information is desired about specific parameters included in this screening program, please refer to the 2004 Toxic Screening Report cited above. Table 3.2 - Concentration of OC Pesticides in 2004 Sediment Samples, (ug /kg) Parameter CSeQGsa, ug /kg PEL b ,Table ug /kg 1` ug /kg Station TS -7 WH1 -S WH2 WH3 WH4 WH5 DDT 1.19 4.77 7 18 10 110 11 110 DDE 1.42 6.75 5 134 910 DDD 45 750 DDD 3.54 8.51 8 40 1700 Aldrin - 30 1400 Idrin - - 2 10 Endosulfan Sulfate - - 13 Endosulfan Sulfate - - 10 a -BHC 20 - - a -BHC - - - 4.5 8.87 7 a- Chlorane 4.5 8.87 7 6.67 2 9 Dieldrin 2.85 6.67 2 - 65 a- Endosulfan - - - 8 lb-Endosulfan I I - I - I I I I 1 8 Table 3.3 - Concentration of OC Pesticides in 2005 Sediment Samples, (ug /kg) Parameter CSeQGsa, ug /kg PEL), ug /kg Table 1` ug /kg Station WH1 -S WH2 WH3 WH4 WH5 DDT 1.19 4.77 7 10 110 DDE 1.42 6.75 5 910 DDD 3.54 8.51 8 40 1700 Aldrin - - 2 10 Endosulfan Sulfate - - 10 a -BHC - - - a- Chlorane 4.5 8.87 7 Dieldrin 2.85 6.67 2 a- Endosulfan - - - b- Endosulfan I I - I - aCSeQGs - Canadian Sediment Quality Guidelines for the Protection of Aquatic Life CSeQGs is part of Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines b PEL - Probable effect level according to CSeQGs (level at which impacts to the aquatic ecosystem occur) MOE Table 1 Standards. bold - Concentrations exceed acceptable criteria Water samples were non - detects for all parameters except for Endosulfan Sulfate and DDD at station WH5. As both parameters are break down products there are no specific guidelines for them. However, the Provincial Water Quality Objective (PWQO) for DDT, developed for the protection of aquatic life, includes its metabolite products (0.003 ug /L). This was exceeded by the sampled DDD concentration of 0.011 ug /L. The concentration of Endosulfan Sulfate similarly exceedes the PWQO for its parent product Endosulfan (0.003 ug /L PWQO, 0.013ug /L sampled concentration). These water samples show that the OC Pesticides sampled in the sediments are mobile or are desorbing into surface waters and can be assumed to be having a negative impact on aquatic life. Organophosphorus (OP) Pesticides were also analyzed in all the 2005 water and sediment samples as they are commonly used today. OP Pesticides however, are not as persistent as OC Pesticides and tend to rapidly break down in the environment. As a result no OP Pesticides were detected in any of the water or sediment samples taken in 2005. 3.4 Lagoon City Nutrient Sampling Due to an increase in growth of aquatic vegetation in the canals of Lagoon City, the LSRCA was asked to sample water quality by the rate payers association. To this end a total of 7 nutrient samples were collected at five locations from June through to November. Table 3.4 below summarizes the analytical results. Table 3.4 — Summary of Lagoon City Sampling The Provincial Water Quality Objective (PWQO) for Phosphorus in rivers is 0.03 mg /L and 0.02 mg /L in lakes. This objective is set to prevent excess growth of aquatic vegetation. While a number of stations reported anon- detect for one or more samples, exceedences of the PWQO were common after rain events. What the samples do not point to is a single source of nutrients as high exceedences and non - detects are spread across all stations. This is also reflected in the uniform nitrogen mean for all stations. While site LC3 (located near a creek draining into the canals) has the highest mean phosphorus concentration, indicating a more consistent source, higher individual values were typically recorded after rain events at sites inside the canal system. Examination of the most recent phosphorus concentrations in Lake Simcoe yield an average yearly concentration of 0.013 mg /L at the station closest to Lagoon City (Eimers et al., 2003). This suggests the phosphorus concentrations sampled in the canals of Lagoon City are not indicative of nutrients being carried back into the canals with lake water. The elevated values are most likely the result of land use practices within the community as well as some portion due to external sources (such as the drain near site LC3). Land use practices that could lead to phosphorus and nitrogen enrichment of the canals include improper or over application of lawn fertilizers, the lack of or removal of stream bank vegetation and stormwater runoff from structures, roads and driveways entering unchecked into the canals. Mean Mean Kjeldahl Mean Phosphorus Nitrogen TSS Station (mg/L (mg/L m /L LC 1 0.021 0.8 2 LC 2 0.03 0.8 5 LC 3 0.043 0.8 6 LC 4 0.021 0.8 2 LC 5 0.03 0.8 2 Water Quality Objective 0.03 The Provincial Water Quality Objective (PWQO) for Phosphorus in rivers is 0.03 mg /L and 0.02 mg /L in lakes. This objective is set to prevent excess growth of aquatic vegetation. While a number of stations reported anon- detect for one or more samples, exceedences of the PWQO were common after rain events. What the samples do not point to is a single source of nutrients as high exceedences and non - detects are spread across all stations. This is also reflected in the uniform nitrogen mean for all stations. While site LC3 (located near a creek draining into the canals) has the highest mean phosphorus concentration, indicating a more consistent source, higher individual values were typically recorded after rain events at sites inside the canal system. Examination of the most recent phosphorus concentrations in Lake Simcoe yield an average yearly concentration of 0.013 mg /L at the station closest to Lagoon City (Eimers et al., 2003). This suggests the phosphorus concentrations sampled in the canals of Lagoon City are not indicative of nutrients being carried back into the canals with lake water. The elevated values are most likely the result of land use practices within the community as well as some portion due to external sources (such as the drain near site LC3). Land use practices that could lead to phosphorus and nitrogen enrichment of the canals include improper or over application of lawn fertilizers, the lack of or removal of stream bank vegetation and stormwater runoff from structures, roads and driveways entering unchecked into the canals. 4.1 Fish Populations in the Streams of the Lake Simcoe Watershed The streams of the Lake Simcoe watershed have a diverse fish population. The 2005 sampling season was spent sampling the Lake Simcoe Environmental Management Strategy sites and sampling the two small subwatersheds of Bluff's Creek and Bogart Creek. Sampling was done using backpack Electro- Fishers following procedures outlined in the Stream Assessment Protocol for Southern Ontario Version 7 2005 (Stanfield 2005). Fifty species of fish were caught at 62 sampling sites over the 2005 sampling season. Two species of Special Concern were captured within the Lake Simcoe basin as shown in Table 4.1. Table 4.1 Species Global Rank National Rank Provincial Rank COSEWIC* greenside G5 (Secure) N4 (Apparently S4 (Apparently Special Concern darter Total Secure ) Secure redside G4 (Apparently N3 (Vulnerable) S3 (Vulnerable) Special Concern dace Secure Warm Cold *Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada Rankings taken from http: / /www.fishdb.ca/ Figure 4.1 shows the locations of each fish sampling site in the Lake Simcoe basin from 2002 to 2005. Figure 4.2 shows the locations of each fish sampling site as it compares to the Fish Habitat Mapping. Certain fish species are indicative of the thermal regime of a stream as they have a tolerance for certain temperature ranges. For example Brook Trout or Mottled Sculpin indicate a cold water habitat while Pumpkinseed indicate warm water habitat. Any sampling point where cold water species are caught is considered cold water habitat, all other sampling points are considered warm water habitat. Fish Communities are one of three data sets used to assess the health of the streams in the watershed. The other two data sets are Benthic Communities and Temperature. A habitat is considered impaired if Warm Water species or No species were collected at a site identified as Cold Water Habitat according to the Fish Habitat Mapping. Unimpaired sites are sites where the Fish Habitat Mapping and Fish Species Sampled agree. See Table 4.2. Of the 62 sites sampled, 38 sites were unimpaired and 25 sites were impaired. Table 4.2 Fish Communities in each thermal regime Fish Habitat Cold Warm Mapping Total Fish None Species Cold Warm Warm Cold Sampled collected Number 31 21 4 6 1 63 of Sites A �L�rjON AU�� J 4 I M 2003 Fish Sampling 2002-2005 - Figure 4.1 - Legend Sample Site Watercourse Municipal Boundary 2005 The information depicted on this map has been compiled from various sources. While every effort has been made to accurately depict the information, data /maping errors may exist. This map has been produced for illustrative • purposes only. N 0 5 10 20 30 40 !T W E Kilometres s Scale: 1:850,000 Projection: NAD 83, UTM Zone 17N LSRCA GIS Services Created May 9, 2006 NOW 2004 �. • O0 am A000000- u P�u 0 °''�' • • 0 0 ��, �� O � • 0 n Ty0 C 0 0 0 cD 0 -�f qrr" �� C L PL L 4 I M 2003 Fish Sampling 2002-2005 - Figure 4.1 - Legend Sample Site Watercourse Municipal Boundary 2005 The information depicted on this map has been compiled from various sources. While every effort has been made to accurately depict the information, data /maping errors may exist. This map has been produced for illustrative • purposes only. N 0 5 10 20 30 40 !T W E Kilometres s Scale: 1:850,000 Projection: NAD 83, UTM Zone 17N LSRCA GIS Services Created May 9, 2006 /-0' z 0' 11 O 0 2005 Fish Sam Pling - Figure 4.2 - Legend Fish Sample O Coldwater Fish O Warmwater Fish O No Fish Watercourse Cold water Warm water Major Road Municipal Boundary The information depicted on this map has been compiled from various sources. While every effort has been made to accurately depict the information, data /maping errors may exist. This map has been produced for illustrative purposes only. N 0 2.5 5 10 15 20 !T W E Kilometres s Scale: 1:425,000 Projection: NAD 83, UTM Zone 17N LSRCA GIS Services Created May 9, 2006 4.2 Benthic Communities of the Lake Simcoe Watershed Aquatic insects, or benthic invertebrates, are an ideal indicator of water quality as different species have different tolerances to factors such as nutrient enrichment, dissolved solids, oxygen and temperature. The presence or absence of certain species is used to determine water quality at a given site. Of the indices developed to assess water quality in relation to benthic communities, BioMAP was selected as it provides a means to locate pollution sources without the large investment of time and resources required by some other indices. Benthic samples were collected using the Ontario Benthic Biomonitoring Network (OBBN) Protocol (Jones 2005). Samples were collected in the spring and fall of 2005. The spring samples were identified to order level and the fall samples were identified to genus and species where possible. A total of 53 sites were sampled for benthic communities and were assessed using "BioMAP Bioassessment of Water Quality" (Griffiths 1999). Of the 53 sites 14 were considered to be unimpaired, 29 were impaired and 10 were inconclusive. The results are summarized in Table 4.2. The sampling locations are indicated in Figure 4.3. Table 4.2 Benthic Communities in different thermal reaimes Fish Habitat Cold Warm Total -Mapping BioMAP Unimpaired Impaired Inconclusive Impaired Inconclusive Number 14 25 8 4 2 53 of Sites Benthic communities are one of three data sets used to assess the health of streams in the watershed. The other two data sets are Fish Communities and Temperature. /-0' +fc1f� r O O r �O O 2005 Benthic Sampling - Figure 4.3 - The information depicted on this map has been compiled from various sources. While every effort has been made to accurately depict the information, data /maping errors may exist. This map has been produced for illustrative purposes only. N 0 2.5 5 10 15 20 !T W E Kilometres S Scale: 1:425,000 Projection: NAD 83, UTM Zone 17N LSRCA GIS Services Created May 9, 2006 4.3 Invasive /Non- Native Species In the last 3 years several non native and invasive fish and benthic macroi nverteb rate species have been captured in the Lake Simcoe Watershed. The round goby (Neogobius melanostomus) is native to Europe and was introduced into Canadian Waters via ballast release from International Ships. Round gobies are an aggressive and fertile sculpin -like species that can out compete native species, such as the yellow perch, for space and food. The goby was first discovered in Pefferlaw Brook by an astute angler in August of 2004. The LSRCA and the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) confirmed the presence of goby in June of 2005 with the capture of 33 goby below the Pefferlaw dam, as well as within Lake Simcoe in the vicinity of Morning Glory Swamp. Extensive sampling was conducted above both dams in Pefferlaw and gobies were not found above these structures. The Ministry of Natural Resources made the difficult decision to try and eradicate this dangerous invader. In partnership with various private and public organizations, including LSRCA, MNR staff collected and transferred as many native fish as possible from below the Pefferlaw Dam to the mouth of the Brook between October 11 and 14, 2005. An application of the piscicide Rotenone was conducted October 17 to 21 by licensed applicators and dead fish were removed from the system. The LSRCA and MNR will continue to monitor the effectiveness of the treatment in 2006 and beyond. The re- colonization of native species such as shiners, rock bass, yellow perch and sunfish has already begun. It is suspected that the goby may have been imported along with baitfish from Lake Erie, an illegal source of baitfish for Lake Simcoe. Other species have been captured that lend credence to this theory. Northern hog sucker, yellow bullhead, green sunfish and white crappie are all native and common to Lake Erie, not Lake Simcoe. These species have been found in the Pefferlaw only since 2004. The MNR have bolstered their enforcement of baitfish laws for both baitfish dealers and anglers in the Lake Simcoe basin. Zebra Mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) were first discovered in the Great Lakes in 1988 in Lake St. Clair near Detroit. They first appeared in Lake Simcoe in 1994 and continue to flourish. Zebra and quagga mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) have now spread to all the Great Lakes and are showing up in inland waterways and lakes throughout North America. The spread of zebra mussels has been more rapid than initially predicted by the experts. Significant changes to aquatic ecosystems have been documented as a result of the introduction of zebra mussels. Zebra mussels filter out large amounts of phytoplankton, and compete with many species of zooplankton which are an important food source for young fish. (OFAH 2006) Rusty Crayfish (Orconectes rusticus) were found in several locations during 2004 and 2005 benthic sampling. This species, native to the United States, degrades aquatic habitats by feeding heavily on aquatic vegetation and harm fish populations by feeding on the eggs and fry of native fish. You can identify rusty crayfish by the rusty red patches on their body; and black tips on their claws; they are generally 7.5 -13 cm long. (OFAH 2006) Ponto- Caspian amphipod (Echinogammarus ischnus) was found during the 2005 Benthic Macro - Invertebrate Sampling and Analysis of Lake Simcoe done by Stantec Consulting (Stantec 2006). The Ponto- Caspian amphipod was discovered in the Great Lakes in 1995. It is apparently replacing the North American amphipod (Gammarus fasciatus) in the lower Great Lakes and upper St. Lawrence River. (Redpath 2006) Spiny Water flea (Bythotrephes longimanus) has been in Lake Simcoe for many years and this was confirmed during the 2005 Benthic Macro - Invertebrate Sampling and Analysis of Lake Simcoe (Stantec 2006). It is believed that the spiny water flea first arrived in North America in the ballast water of Eurasian ships. The first recorded occurrence of the spiny water flea in North America was in Lake Ontario in 1982, and by 1987 it was present in all of the Great Lakes. The spiny water flea feeds on small animal life called zooplankton. When populations of this invader are high, zooplankton consumption can be significant. Compared to native zooplankton species, it eats up to three times as much food. Unfortunately, this prey is also the preferred food of native predatory zooplankton and native species of juvenile fish, resulting in direct competition. (OFAH 2006) To stop the transfer of invasive species fishing tackle, scuba gear, boats and motors should be thoroughly cleaned before entering and after exiting Lake Simcoe. Bait buckets should not be emptied into the water. Gobies, ruffe or rudd are illegal to be used as bait in Ontario. For addition information or to report invasive species please contact the Invading Species Hotline at 1- 800 - 563 -7711 or visit www.invadingspecies.com. 4.4 Thermal Stability in the Lake Simcoe Watershed The average temperature at a stream site is important to the survival of different species of fish. In particular Brook Trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) require cold water conditions that are not prone to large fluctuation in temperature. Coldwater sites are considered to have an average maximum summer temperature of approximately 14 degrees Celsius. Coolwater sites are considered to have average maximum summer temperatures of 18 degrees Celsius. Warmwater sites have an average maximum daily water temperature of 23 degrees Celsius. Fish Habitat Mapping The mapping presented here is based on known historically collected temperatures and fish species compositions, supplemented and augmented by contemporary data. This mapping is used for watershed planning and is dynamic in nature. Certain assumptions have been made: • Coldwater habitat can feed warmwater habitat, however, warmwater cannot feed Coldwater. If a Coldwater site is noted downstream of a warmwater tributary, that tributary should be managed as Coldwater habitat. • The presence of brook trout, brown trout (Salmo trutta), mottled sculpin (Cottus bairdi) or slimy sculpin (C. cognatus) indicates Coldwater habitat and overrides the presence of other species. • The presence of rainbow darter (Etheostoma caeruleum) or redside dace (Clinostomus elongatus) indicates coolwater habitat, however, cold and coolwater habitat are afforded the same development restrictions, thus the coolwater category is always reported as Coldwater habitat. • Lake Simcoe is considered Coldwater habitat. 2005 Temperature Studies To monitor stream water temperatures 84 electronic loggers were installed the watershed for the summer of 2005. They were installed in late May to early June and were retrieved late September to early October. When the data was downloaded from the loggers it was compared to air temperature data over the same time period to identify warm, cool and cold streams. This was done using "A Simple Method to Determine the Thermal Stability of Southern Ontario Trout Streams" (Stoneman, C.L. and M.L. Jones. 1996). Figure 4.4 shows the locations of all of the loggers and thermal stability at each site overlaid on the fish habitat map. Stream temperature is one of three data sets used to assess the health of the streams in the watershed. The other two data sets are Benthic Communities and Fish Communities. Stream temperatures collected from the loggers were compared to the warm and cold water Fish Habitat Mapping to assess heath of watercourses. Unimpaired sites are locations were the temperatures collected with loggers closely match the Fish Habitat Mapping. Table 4.3 shows the number of unimpaired sites in each thermal regime. Impaired sites are stations where the temperatures collected with loggers vary from the Fish Habitat Mapping. Table 4.4 shows the number of impaired sites for each thermal regime. No Data sites are stations where loggers have been lost or stolen. Table 4.5 shows the number of sites that did not report any data. Table 4.3 Number of Unimpaired Sites for each thermal regime Fish Habitat Mapping Mapping Cold Warm Temperatures -Temperatures Recorded Cool/Warm Total Recorded Cold Cool Warm Warm /dry Temperatures Number of 1 19 7 27 Number of 12 23 6 7 48 Sites Table 4.4 Number of Impaired Sites for each thermal regime Fish Habitat Mapping Cold Cold Warm Total -Temperatures Recorded Cool/Warm Warm Warm /dry Temperatures Temperatures Number of Number of 1 19 7 27 Sites Table 4.5 Number of No Data Sites for each thermal regime Fish Habitat Mapping Cold Warm Temperatures Total Recorded No Data Temperatures Number of 4 5 9 Sites Temperature Loggers This map has been produced for illustrative purposes only. N 0 2.5 5 10 15 20 !T W E Kilometres S t� r Scale: 1:425,000 Projection: NAD 83, UTM Zone 17N O LSRCA GIS Services Created May 9, 2006 4.5 Ecological Land Classification To achieve a goal of managing both the natural resources of the Lake Simcoe watershed, as well as the information regarding these resources, the Ecological Land Classification (ELC) approach was used. ELC is a procedure whereby recurring ecological patterns within the complex landscape can be identified and reduced to a manageable number of meaningful ecosystem units. The ELC manual for Southern Ontario (site regions 6E and 7E) (Burger, 1993) was used in conjunction with orthophoto interpretation to determine land- cover /use to the Community Series scale. Community Series represents the highest level of detail attainable in the ELC that can be identified without requiring site visits. The landscape was therefore delineated into vegetation cover and plant form; in this manner, the most stable and significant characteristics of the ecosystem are delineated. At this scale, differences in vegetation cover generally reflect levels of disturbance, isolation, as well as a variety of other environmental gradients. Natural heritage features (i.e. deciduous forests, thicket swamps) as well as existing land use (i.e. rural development, intensive agriculture) are delineated as polygons. Complete coverage of ELC data currently exists for the Lake Simcoe watershed. Further analysis is currently underway to achieve complete coverage of ELC data according to conditions present in spring 2002. In its current state, the landscape of the Lake Simcoe watershed has been separated into nearly 35 000 units. The data were interpreted and digitized at a scale of 1:4000, with orthophotography being the predominant source of data. Supplementary data consists of wetland evaluations performed by the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR), Areas of Natural and Scientific Interest (MNR), and elevation data to determine topography. Figure 4.5 shows the ELC data layer, with many of the related ecological classifications aggregated for purposes of data display. Once this update is complete, the data will form the basis for ongoing research by providing objective stratification and sampling of ecological conditions. This is important for applications such as growth and yield studies, modeling nutrient loads, long -term ecological research, forest management, life science inventories, and restoration. The ELC mapping is designed to be expandable and is a living document that will be updated as new and more current data becomes available; orthophotography is becoming available at an increasing frequency. 444: ` x e , /''' .. p, � r .� > ,- ��. �`+i .ems, �!� {,.* � � • ti } .r . a tl r Land Cover - Figure 4.5 - r r _ r e rI �pa a �r Legend Land Cover Aggregates High Intensity Developed Low Intensity Developed Agriculture Transitional Wetland Forest Water - Road The information depicted on this map has been compiled from various sources. While every effort has been made to accurately depict the information, data /maping errors may exist. r i This map has been produced for illustrative e \- � purposes only. , s ' i 0 2.5 5 10 15 20 . _. W E ilk r .� - - Kilometres r vt S s Scale: 1:4251000 Projection: NAD 83 UTM Zone 17N LSRCA GIS Services r Created May 2, 2006 5 Conclusion There is a great deal more that can be done with the data described in this report. One purpose of this report was that individuals or agencies interested in conducting a more in depth analysis of the data know of its existence. To that end anyone seeking information concerning biologic or temperature data should contact Rob Wilson ( those interested in precipitation groundwater or surface water quality or quantity should contact David Lembcke (d.lembcke(c�Isrca.on.ca). Water Quantity 2005 can be characterized as having been a dry year. Through precipitation, stream flow, groundwater levels and baseflow data it is apparent that water levels in 2005 were low by many standards. As well the data showed a disparity between the east and west sides of the watershed in terms of stream flow and precipitation. Whether this disparity is a result of increasing or changing demands on water supply, changing climate patterns or changing land use will become an increasingly important question if this trend continues. Over 700 baseflow measurements were conducted in 2005. The dry conditions contributed to interesting baseflow results in 2005 as groundwater discharge contributed a greater percentage of baseflow discharge resulting in greater gaining and losing reaches. Reference sites measured monthly baseflow discharge at a number of sites across the watershed. These sites also highlighted the contribution of groundwater discharge to baseflow through a comparison of sites on the Oak Ridges Moraine with sites off the Moraine. Sites off the Moraine showed a marked reduction in mid to late summer baseflow discharge while sites on the Moraine showed less of a reduction. Water Quality Many of the same water quality issues identified in 2004 continued through 2005. Phosphorus continues to be one of the most wide spread and problematic pollutant in the rivers and streams of Lake Simcoe. Concentrations of aluminum exceeded the US EPA acute toxicity guideline for the first time in the 2002 to 2005 PWQMN data set in 2005. However, further analysis of chronic aluminum guidelines and further sampling has suggested that exceedences of the chronic total aluminum guideline may not be having toxic effects in the Lake Simcoe Watershed. Further research is required by scientists and guideline makers to understand the ranges of aluminum toxicity. Holland Landing was found to have the most impacted water quality including acute toxic readings of aluminum and chloride and has exceeded the phosphorus guideline in all 2005 samples. High readings of iron and manganese were recorded through much of 2005 at Maskinonge River. These readings are uniquely high in the 2002 to 2005 data set and will require further monitoring to determine if these values are an anomaly or an emerging trend. Toxic Pollutant Screening sampling in 2005 confirmed the presence of Organochlorine pesticides sampled in the sediments Holland Marsh in 2004. While the sampled concentrations are likely the result of historical application, two pesticide metabolites were detected in water samples at concentrations exceeding the PWQO for the parent products. These water samples show that the OC Pesticides sampled in the sediments are mobile or are desorbing into surface waters and can be assumed to be having a negative impact on aquatic life. Biologic Indices In 2005 a fewer number of fish sites were sampled but more data was collected from each site giving providing better data to work with. This was the first year that the full OSAP protocol was used to assess fish habitat. The protocol allows for fish habitat information to be collected along with fish catch information. Benthic collections were identified to the species and genus level. This along with the use of the BioMAP protocol provided better information on the health of the benthic communities in the watercourses of the Lake Simcoe Watershed. Over the past few years a number on new invasive fish and invertebrate species have populated, or attempted to populate, Lake Simcoe. The LSRCA in partnership with the Department of Fisheries and Oceans, the Ministry of Natural Resources and the Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters are working to reduce these invaders in the lake. The eradication of the Round Goby in Pefferlaw Brook in 2005 is a great example of how multiple agencies can pool resource to tackle an important project. The newly created Fish Habitat Mapping and the temperature logger data collected in 2005 are two complementary data sets. Together they provide the tools to identify and assess the temperature regimes of watercourses in the Lake Simcoe Watershed. A combination of Fish Community, Benthic Community and temperature data is important to assess where significant habitat needs to be protected and where degraded habitat needs to be rehabilitated. f` CO i O CO N CO i N M C� ti M 0 O to � O N O N O N N N O O N CU M N 00 ti (3) (D a) 0 0 C/) & p 00 > J > J O C/) J J J p J J J J J co co M M N NN M Lid - co N Li) (fl co f` CO co 000 r CO 0 M CO , co N r r r~ 00 � N m m m I` m C4- r r r � 00 ' M O M ' N N N O� O 00 N N CD I` 00 I,,-- N M CO 00 t q O O� -~ N O C04 N co 00 Ln � 0 O N ti ' N O r 00 N� r N r r ti O M U-) O 00 M Lo (fl N f` O N O O ti O M O O I` N Gi N r ti O M (o r, O N m m M U-) O U-) N O O O N O 00 '14- N oo Fm CV) co co N r O u O r r m O M co M CO 00 r r CV) Oo NN M M CO r- N 00 N CYj (D C�4 CO 00 co N 0) 0) O r O O M m� O) O O N O C) LO IN- O co N r TOM (D N� N r r Cfl r r O O 00 00 O O CD CO CD qq m O N 00 M CA (D Ln r (D 0 co O (7; CO LO r O 00 C3� Lid O Iq N m�(D r r r co r d) C) � I` UD O ' 00 00 T. 00 ti r C3') C3') C3') O N C37 d' co M O o O 00 O t LO r o 00 co O 00 N r O I` N O N(D ti 00 Or 1 qq co r N r® TM N co N N C04 r r 00 C37 f` co C37 CO LO O ~ ti r p C37 O C37 I` m O� O r 00 r � O Co O N O� 1` M O O O p O 0 0 M 0 N (9 co C) N NT (D Iq O O r N O ti N N O N r r 000 r 0) r r (D N co O 00 O r N N co 00 O 00 r m M r co 0 r, I d' r 00 O 00 q1t I� co 0� pp r O (D co CR N r N N 1�- � O co co ti CO 0 LO O r C9 N � 00 r r N r� C6 O� r, N r r r~ m CA O (Q N M O 0 C* CO r C04 CO 0� CO qq Im qq p M N N r r O C� O Co M r O r r co N d' N ~ M O I` C� 000 N N O ti d' r M 00 N 1` Q r D O M O M(P M r r co r r r- O 00 M O ul N M r r 00 M (fl r ti O M 00 M C3� O N co � r O CO O r O N O CO O N M N N co CN f` M - CO (fl r C0'4 O 0 M N m M O 00 r d- (D N f` r N O N N r m r (fl r O r � O 00 N 00 O C37 00 co O O M N co 0 O N r ~ O 00 N (fl (fl r M r M CO M 07 O I` ti N N L{j d- N~ Re O r CYj LO N M r N~ 0 r O O O r 0 00 co C37 O O O CO Cfl M 00 O ti 0 O N O M I` O M N co (o N r� e r z O O M M N N CO r O r r M N 000 co to 01 r O ca VC/) i co co ca Go ca w ca ca ca ca O c� ca ca ca O O to p ca to i i i U U V O I'— � � � O � O � O � 00 00 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O Lm I O o o E 0 0 0 0 0 0 E E O N ® 00 i O O O O 00 O (fl O cf- 00 O 00 O 10 O "f- � W 00 00 00 a) M M M 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 O N O N O N M 00 � O O O cf- M O 00 O Cfl O cf- 00 � Loo� O cf- f` CO N M i N M co co to O I` I` � z 00 O J N JC/) N J N J N J Z N J N J N J J J Cti O N O f` 00 d' O O 0') O Crj O O N TOM O O O NIr—, co N N 0 M O LO r f` f` ti (� N co r O p 0 (� 0 r r r LO M M CV N M �- O N O I` 0 0 qq 00 N ti r r C4 M 1` M O V O 00 (fl r ti N r N~ N M 00 00 co N OM O N ti Lid r r r r (V r r ti O r I` co N r Lo I` 00 d. C4 Cfl r M CO o qq (D O f` N M~ tC ~ r r r r Cfl r ti N r N CO O r r (D CA O N r M O~ r~ O (D r O 00 '14- N oo CV) O co 0) O O u O NT 0') m 0 f` m N M CO r r r CV) Oo O LO M M N O N r 0 r 00 N N O� o M r T" r r O co N r ' (D N� Li7 N C37 Cfl M O C�4 p� M ti M O 1` r 00 M ui r O r O O O O O (D Ln O O O N r CO r r r 00 O M N N r r N r O r ~ O O O ' 00 00 00 ti r C3') C3') C3') O N C37 N N (D � V 00 TM O 00 � C� M I` 00 O � N(D 0-) I� N 00 TM N r C37 CO LO O ~ ti r p C37 O C37 I` m O� O LO r 00 r I` O Iq t O O co O LO I� Ln � O M O (D N CO r N~ 0 r f` TOM r N r r r C37 I` N co O 00 O N ti N N co 00 O 00 r m M co 0 r, I f` 00 co r N N O r O I� co co N pp r O r r r O L7 r N (� O7 CQ co O r r Iq 00 0') N C6 Oo r, r N co O M m CA M N N O C� O~ O O CO r N (fl f` M O N N O N I` d7 � (D I` N N~ 0 0 r r r r r O M 00 N 1` Q LO D O M O M(P M N O N co M 0 0 (D (D r N M r r O M N N LO CN O7 r (fl (D r r N 0) (D � O ti ti N d- (D 00 O N r Co M M N m M O 00 00 r d- (D N f` r N O N N r m r (fl 00 r O r O I` M M 00 ~ O co (fl 00 r M CO r 0 N N L{j d- N~ Re O N CYj LO N M r N~ 0 r O O O N 0 00 co C37 N z c� O cry O ca co to co to co to O ca VC/) O O O to p to O O O U U V O I'— � � � O � O � O � 00 00 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O E O o o E 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N O N O N I M 00 i 0 O 0 "t- M O 00 O (fl O cf- 00 O 00 O 10 O "f- CL a L CL a M 1E, N M r N M L- r N M LO CO N 00 00 a N N Q Q 0 (U N N N tU N N co o D 0~0 3 � u0 O N J N J� U O > N J > O J > N J O > N J N J N J J U) J CO LO 0 O TOM r M 00 N 00 LO M O LO CO N C37 f` CO 00 C� LO M CD N Cfl co w N f` f` CO 'q O (� N M 00 C� M N O CA M r r cM LO TOM r N r r r r r 00 LO N 00 00 C M ti 00 0) CO r Cfl O N C3. m CO m CO 0 d'1 1` N N N ti Iq co m N O CA N LO M M M r r C1 co m Ln N r N N r r r r o0 Liz N 00 O . Q N N M r M 0 � N f` N M d' O O O Nr N CN 00 ti LO M 00 m O Nr 00 00 CO M C+7 !� O r r M LO f` LO � O 01 N N O N LO r O r CA M r r M 00 m LO O CO r � 00 LO 00 co ti r r r Ln � C�, O M C4 N ' O r LO LO O M I- 0 O 00 LO O C3 N C D CO �N00NM LO C) N N r N co�c� m co N N��01 M r r r co Ln 00 co CV w ~ C) C4 r- co O 00 LO Ln N 0) CO (D Iq CC M O o 0 0� M O l00 0~ (� r O N L00 r M CC M r r CO N N r r r r 00 LO O r 00 �! co O7 m O O ti CO CO L- CO LO CrO N 0 O N O7 f` f` N M co r O co LO Oj N M CYj CO O ~ r M r � N CA r r co LO 00 CO N co O N Nr N N ~ Cfl C. M O7 co r co ~ Cfl 00 CO 00 LO O 00 M O N CO ti r O o0 00 N M N N O OO LO co O m CO C) co LO 114- O M O N N O 00 t� 00 r r ti N r r q r r~ r LO O~ co M w N S LMC� 0 CO N M M CO f` CO M Co M N N~ 00 M CO C37 00 N M O M~ r d) O 00 f` f` � r� co r r f` N LO 00 O co a O r O N O r � r r O N 00 N r r co r r ti LO f` N O N I- O I, M Cfl ti O N - 0) 00 CO Tom TOM r 00 r CO CO O CO N r j r r~ LO ti M C37 r CND o0 � ti cn N O r O 00 N O� O I` Ln co r r 0 LO N 00 N CO N O f` CO O ti 00 00 r N Cfl co O N CO f` CO CO N O N TOM O co r O7 CO CO N~ O7 r co r O CD r r f` N r M O LO O ti O ti LO N N cn N co TOM LO I- 00 r I` co OO r r 0 LO O r 0 ~ O Cfl N� r ~ N N CO r N O ti� o0 00 co N 1` ~ O r N M LO CN, co N I� 00 r O U-) r N r r f` N M 0 O O O M 00 Ct� O O r O Ln CO o0 O r 00 LO r r~ O� LO CO 00 00 r ~ 000 O N 00 00 M O co O LO co co N Co 00 Iq co N A CO R~ r O M f` LO NT M N N r~ r N LO 00 ti co 0) O N m TOM TM N r r r r M LO .z O N ca ca m m m ca N N ca N N N N i O i O i O O O OC) c: z z I EE O O O _ �►.i O O O O M� Mr MEi *V co co W N N 0 0 0 E *V = o o 11 o 0 0 o 0 0 O N O N O N M 00 ,%- m Q� 0 CO 0 cf- M O 00 O CO O cf- 00 O co O CO O I cf- i N co r N M L- r N M co a O 00 3 0 (U N N tU N N LO CD O co LO Cfl 0 0 O > J > J a) J J J® O J J J J U) J 0 0 0 M N LO f` LO O d- O M O N O N M N LO 00 C. CO Co CO Wj O O� co O f` � r co O LO O CN LO r CO CO LO r TOM N N N r r r r 00 LO N N 00 M m LO �~ r CO r N CO CO m O LO r 00 r M M O O m B LO CO M N CO O r f` Ln LO O LO r m CO m IN- N r N N r r r r o0 LO N 00 O . Q N N O o0 co CO � CO f` IN I` r � d' B N O O O o0 o0 � N M C0O co O r co 0 o0 ti LO r (V (V r r r r O CO � 00 LO 00 co ti r Ln M ' 41 O O O w O co N m LO M LO 00 r 000 N N r m LLLO N r r 000 L 00 00 Lo M CO r- O N r- Lf) C:) LO O f` 00 Cccc O O o0 LO co M O 0 � CO r r CNI r r r r o0 LO N N oo �! N co O7 O ti 00 co CO r O~ N CN r M r t r 0 N CO f` M N � N 00 O M CA N f` M Op O') O M co C� T" r r LO CO N N co O N co 00 LO LO LO C. co . O7 co r co co Cfl M CO LO � O 00 r O r 00 O r CO o0 r� LO M N O r CO r ti 07 O � r CSI r 'T-- N co 00 r CO LO O 00 N 00 M r ti r CA Cfl q 00 r ti r M co M O N r LMC� 0 CO o0 r LO M r N CO f` N M Co M m M 1'r- r 00 M 00 LO r r r N r r r 00 LO O � � ol O N 00 CO I� co CO O CO O N N N N M 00 LO O N 0 � Nr 00 r r r f` N COO r L) r r r r r o0 LO cn N O O 00 N O� O I` Ln co � 000 0 0 E O 00 N N N M f` LO co N� r N co co co LO CO r 00 CO CO N N r r 00 00 LO N cn N co CD LO I- 00 r I` co OO 0 O 0 0 M d7 - N r ~ N r O 0 M 0 00 co O LO co 0 LO N cn M r r TOM LO M N N r r O7 r r r o0 LO 00 Ct� O O ~ O Ln CO o0 O r 00 LO N C4 O� co O CNI f� a) m M O ti O M m CO LO f` co CO r LO O ti� r co 00 Co 00 r r N N r r r r 00 LO N N N N N N I EE •- ,r - ,r - N N (� � O *V O O O M� M� M� �� 00 /�� 00 /�� 00 M M W •�, 4► 4-. 4 . 4, 4 . �' 4, 4, 4, co O X O 0 O 0 O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N O N O N M 00 0 CO 0 cf- M O 00 O CO O cf- 00 O 00 O CO O cf- J a F- 0 F- 0 Z V O CL CD a L IL a L LL Co v Co 4-0 x a) 0- - E o II •� U L O (a 'c W E i II O 1E, N co cu -r- N CO N co (D O � O 00 3 N � � N N N � O � O J � J J J J J � O N o N� f` U-) q- co N N M N 00 L O N r 0 r m� co N O� N O� LO co 00 r�- U-) 00 00 . N Lf) 07 ~ Cfl O') N 07 (0 O M LO r m co qe O O O') LO (D M CND O LO O � � r COD r- r r N N � 00 U') co M � 114- N N O 00 00 0 Cfl f` ~ f` f` M � M M Iq O r O 00 00 q CV M co co O Cfl CD O� Iq U co 0 f` r r N N 00 U') 00 CO 00 00 00 M ti 07 ~ LO M _ O (6 � Iq 0 m ti M co � M w r r r M� M N O � � 00 LO Cfl I� 00 N ti � f` � LO O LO ~ r M 07 � Cfl (D 00 TOM TM CO LO M N 00 LO to ~ N M m O ti 00 00 ~ (D 07 Cfl r Re oc0 N f` M f` 00 O co � � M N 0) M TOM O r (D co N N O) co O 00 LO A N N � M M 00 L� (fl 00 07 co � co co (fl M M M 07 M� CN Cfl T 00 TOM O r 00 � N 00 LO M 00 ti ~ 0') C� 00 ti M M N O O C� 00 � co N Cfl N co CO 00 07 CO 00 00 LO T" r co Cfl I� Co 00 M O N 00 00 O Cfl L I . M� co (D O co O � Cfl O Cfl r M r M r N co � � � N I- 00 Cfl Lo C'%4 O 00 N O O I` 00 co 000 0 0 � Ui Ui N CO f` Cfl N�� N N Cfl 00 Cfl (D r C r r (D CO N� N � � 00 � 00 U-) I� O ti 00 ti CO O ti O M m M r*-- 114- N N 00 M O m LO CD co (D ti N r r TOM LO CO N N O � r 00 LO N O 00 CD Oo co N co M o0 O o0 O co m (D LO I` co co Cfl O r- r- co 00 00 N r N N a0 LO N N N N N N p N N N to N N E N E r Sz r N ca � s . ca c0 co E E O *� Fz F O *� co W W *► ► c J c J ` J co O � O Lo O 0 O o 0 0 0 'e 0 'a 0 0 a 0 0 O O O 00 0 0 O O (,fl O 00 O O O N N N M 1 Cfl 1 cf- M 100 1 1 cf- � 00 Cfl cf- Co v Co 4-0 x a) 0- - E o II •� U L O (a 'c W E i II O C 0 ca C a) U C O U m L L O O L C m a) E (n a) C E 2 c0 c6 N L U c6 a) cu m O L6 :3 CU N N a) U ) O i cu a) 0 � Q a) U C J U (n N p E U a) O a) U N E a) T U L I O � V QC C C L C a) = C N C a) •X C �, c6 O O C L c6 O to c6 N L N N J O 0) O (6 >> 0) U) c �> �X♦ a) J — C O (n N Q� > O L U Q c6 O C L� C L a) T p a) O a) N c0 U O Lo = O O -0 M O a) L M c6 C a) O O a) U O 0) O M co U Q o L In 0 O a) c� C1 L N (6 m L "J tq (�i) J a)_ c6 Q o L a) "- � Ue > X m 0� O L �♦ > O W (q c6 U O U) O > O U O O ca c6 - E cu C p . 1 C a) c6 R O C C "- N a) cn CL a) O >9 O aV N l L � O L c a) O) a) c6 Q L 1 C {6 O O- a) (6 L Q O (6 a) CU a) C O O C (6 1 L >j E L a) cu N— a) (6 C O `� N C N a) O E � �„ O a) Q (n 1 'U C a) c6 :3 J (6 3: J 0) .0 (q c6 c6 "' O O O m O C E� O cm �_ C a) C a) c6 cu — c6 (6 7, U (6 c6 O E L c6 O U L cQ cQ O X O) L C +r .0 C L N U a) N O O (Q to E O E a) c6 �. c6 a) C (n .0 O '~ (n yU+ C U) cQ a) �' �' (n O L W (n O O (n O m m cu N Q LO O p — H O (n O -0> C c6 a) O -0 o a) U N > a) N .� O m U L cu (6 O a) "- O Z5 Un U) O eR O a) C � O O C C a) (n L C a) —_ (n N O U L X a) a) O C (n L C C L 3: a) c6 ^` L W O a) M n♦ L an)♦ E^` O �+ N c6 C O >, .O _ fR X c6 "L_ C N �_ X E y+ O cQ - �♦ Q c0 L N a) � m a� a) Q O a) �+ O U) O (6 cu a) C aC) L cu — O a) (n O cU U — 0 c6 O O �H O 4H L) yr c6 O W W (n U (n a) m O L �+ a) L) C O N W L to a) N u) L Q a) U >1 (6 �. y-+ a) m i j Q O tq >_ a) cU6 C C •� cu C "' C O ' L +L- c6 ca y-+ c6 C C a3 y-+ C co cQ C y+ X a) cu >' N > ca a) "� C C O C -C L > O to Q" � '� C M O N d to U W C C ?' L O +' T C c6 >, fa) L O a) ^ Y >J C U) >' � fLR O �Y C a) > U M C X > X (n C♦ ^ (y Y >J V) O C♦ _0 a) V) O O L` W T C cn c�6 U �N O U) ^ Y>J E O -0 a) U) O L L O O "- m � c �, C C♦ y� (n O O `F U O U O L L (n O 'Y �, m O C U OU L cn a) a) cn (n a) to c6 U E (n N C a) (n W cn Q `F _ N a) L "J (n VD "- U c �+ aC) C O ^L` a) -0 cn O L c6 U a) (LQ C C — E � N O O L L "-' (n U N m U) -0 O c0 C (6 Q L m (6 (6 O C O U L L N O (n Z) U W � cQ aj C cn U (6 > N cu O a) Q ?� cn a) - C c6 cn p U a) O X aa) Y U O a) ca E a) O C a) N O O N — > d c "_ U � N L C _ L �♦ c6 U_ (6 �� a C cu U) (n cu Ta) •U (n a) � Lo O U cu t \F m a) E a) L a) c6 cn •v �' Q ^` a) C N m L �+ U _ a) Q m L U U L a) a) N —_ m a) N E C yU+ C m a) U) C N 0 LO (n U C c6 v^`)` L W N •L cn O (n N U N E a) U) 0) O c6 E ^�` E a) U - O L Q o +-; U c6 O a) a) Q E 0) N i References Burger, D. (1993) Revised Site Revisions of Ontario: Concepts, methodology and utility. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Ontario Forest Research Institute. Eimers, M.C, Winter, J. (2004) Lake Simcoe Water Quality Update 200 -2003, LSEMS Technical Report Imp. B.20 Environment Canada (2003) Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines Griffiths, R.W. (1999) BioMAP Bioassessment of Water Quality. The Centre for Environmental Training, Niagara College. Hem, John D. (1989) Study and Interpretation of the Chemical Characteristics of Natural Water, U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Jones, C., K.M. Somers, B. Craig, T.B. Reynoldson. (2005) OBBN Protocol Manual V 1.0. Ontario Ministry of Environment. Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority (2004) Lake Simcoe Watershed 2004 Environmental Monitoring Report Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority (2005) Lake Simcoe Watershed Toxic Pollutant Screening Program Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters (OFAH). (2006) www.invadingspecies.com Ontario Ministry of Environment (1994) Water Management; Policies, Guidelines, Provincial Water Quality Objectives Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources (2002) Ontario Low Water Response Ontario Ministry of Environment (1981) Outlines of Analytical Methods Ricciardi, A. (2006) Redpath Museum &McGill School of Environment. http: / /www. red path-staff . mcg ill.ca /ricciard i /echinogammarus. htm I Scott, L.D., Winter, J.G., Girard, R. E (2005) Annual Water Balances, Total Phosphorus Budgets and Total Nitrogen, Chloride Loads for Lake Simcoe (1998 — 2004), Lake Simcoe Environmental Management Strategy Implementation Phase III, Technical Report No. Imp.A.6. Stanfield, L. (2005) Ontario Stream Assessment Protocol. Ministry of Natural Resources. Stantec Consulting Limited. (2006) Benthic Macro - invertebrate Sampling and Analysis of Lake Simcoe. Stoneman, C.L. and M.L. Jones. (1996) A Simple Method to Determine the Thermal Stability of Southern Ontario Trout Streams. N. Amer. J. Fish. Manage. In press. United States Environmental Protection Agency (2006) National Recommended Water Quality Criteria �y Pennycook, Marilyn From: Shirmike Paisley Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 10:27 PM To: Pennycook, Marilyn Subject: Att. mayor and council& Harry Hughes my wife Shirley and myself have been residents of 2 Woodland Cres. for the past seven years.We are located at the corner od Woodland Cr. and Bidwell Rd. we live with our daughter and husband and grandaughter. Because her parents leave for work early in the morning either my wife or myself walk her up to the school bus stop on the corner of Bidwell and Woodland Cres every morning for the past seven years. There are 5 children at this stop and three sets of parents.During these past seven years, we have seen a great increase in the traffic going up and down Bidwell road.We see people speed down Bidwell hill every morning.on two occasions this past winter, we have seen cars applying brakes at the last minute and skidding towards the children. we would like to have the speed limit lowered to 50km and a sign posted on Bidwell Rd. going west between the two entrances to the crescent. We are all concerned for the safety of these children and wish to prevent a tragedy. Could you please give this matter your prompt attention. Thank you Shirley and Michael Paisley 1 PRINT:County of Simcoe Page 1 of 1 i http:// www. maps. discoversimcoe .con/onpoint/onpoint 6/27/2006 County of Simcoe o>:: craighutsY Y by YC � 0¢i Y M ��~ti'�+, � c�. °T1 •r��i' . l�� 'may_ r e C _ t Map printed on: Tue Jun 27 11:15:05 2006 0 f 0.3km Disclaimer: This map is not a legal survey!. C01 Comments:. Nai Phi Land Information Network Cooperative Em http:// www. maps. discoversimcoe .con/onpoint/onpoint 6/27/2006 t° 279 Line 4 South R. R. #1 Shanty Bay, Ontario LOL 2LO May 30, 2006 u I dR O t -' Mayor Neil Craig and Council Members Township of Oro - Medonte P.O. Box 100 Oro - Medonte, Ontario LOL 1X0 Attention: Marilyn Pennycook, Clerk Further to my letter of April 7, 2006 I have had no response. Further to the request of the review of the Noise Bylaw and restrictions regarding noise levels and hours of operation, I am informing Council and the Bylaw Officer that the noise from Duncor during the month of May has been intolerable. From being awakened screaming at 6:15 a.m. by the banging of dump truck doors, throughout the day and evening, beeping set to the loudest volume available, honking of horns from early morning to late at night, the noise is unrelenting. Since this cumulative worsening effect from both industries is seriously affecting my health, as you are aware from the copy of a letter from my physician, I have yet again contacted the Ministry of the Environment as well as the OPP last night at midnight. The tankers and trucks were rolling in from about 10 p.m.to 12:10 midnight today, and the loud beeping could be heard by the OPP dispatcher through the phone line with doors and windows closed through this heat wave because of the sounds from the industries. For a township to show such a blatent disregard for its residents is despicable. At what point will council do something about the noise bylaw — when someone has a stroke or heart attack? Signed, r Irena - Wieslawa Szczebior cc: Ren-i�, Bylaw Officer � &� I �,-C, - THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO- MEDONTE CITIZEN OF THE YEAR ADVISORY GROUP MINUTES Monday, June 19, 2006,10:14 a.m. CHAMBERS Present: Berit McArthur, Donald McArthur, Alastair Crawford, Jean Crawford, Pat Shellswell, Fay Craig, Betty Veitch, Allan Sinton, Evelyn Reid Regrets: Joan Reid, Loreen Lucas Staff Present: Janette Teeter, Clerk's Assistant 1. OPENING OF THE MEETING BY JANETTE TEETER, CLERK'S ASSISTANT Janette Teeter opened the meeting at 10:14 a.m. 2. SELECTION OF CHAIRPERSON. Motion No. 1 Moved by Patricia Shellswell, Seconded by Allan Sinton That the Chairperson for the 2006 Citizen of the Year Advisory Group be Betty Veitch as voted by the Advisory Group. Carried. 3. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA. Motion No. 2 Moved by Donald McArthur, Seconded by Alastair Crawford That the Agenda for the 2006 Citizen of the Year Advisory Group meeting of Monday, June 19, 2006 be received and adopted. Carried. 4. ADOPTION OF MINUTES OF CITIZEN OF THE YEAR COMMITTEE MEETING HELD ON TUESDAY, JUNE 21, 2005. Motion No. 3 Moved by Jean Crawford, Seconded by Evelyn Reid That the minutes of the Citizen of the Year Committee meeting held Tuesday, June 21, 2005 be received and adopted as printed and circulated. Carried. 5. PRESENTATION OF LETTERS OF NOMINATION AND DISCUSSION RE: NOMINEES. Motion No. 4 Moved by Alastair Crawford, Seconded by Fay Craig That Edna Caldwell's name be added to the ballot sheet for the 2006 Citizen of the Year Advisory Group meeting. Carried. Motion No. 5 Moved by Jean Crawford, Seconded by Berit McArthur That the nominations for the 2006 Citizen of the Year Advisory Group meeting be closed. Carried. 6. VOTING. Motion No. 6 Moved by Patricia Shellswell, Seconded by Alastair Crawford It is recommended to Council that the 2006 Citizen of the Year be Edna Caldwell, as voted by the Advisory Group. Carried. Citizen of the Year Advisory Group Meeting June 19, 2006, Page 2 7. FURTHER BUSINESS. Motion No. 7 Moved by Allan Sinton, Seconded by Berit McArthur 3 That the letters of nomination for the Citizen of Year be kept on file for a maximum of four years and automatically added to the ballot list accordingly each year. 8. ADJOURNMENT. Motion No. 8 Moved by Alastair Crawford, Seconded by Jean Crawford That we do now adjourn at 10:45 a.m. Carried. Carried. Citizen of the Year Advisory Group Meeting June 19, 2006, Page 3 .,)C) - 1 TOWNSHIP OF ORO- MEDONTE ..- Dept. Report No. TR2006 -14 To: Committee of the Whole Prepared By: Paul Gravelle Council C. of W. Motion # Date: Subject: Renewal of Insurance Coverage Department: Treasury Date: June 19, 2006 R.M. File #: Roll #: 11BACKGROUND: The municipality's present insurance coverage expires on July 1St, 2006. Our present insurers, Frank Cowan Company Limited, have provided the municipality with a renewal proposal. ANALYSIS: All coverage and deductible levels remain constant with our current coverage. The proposed premiums including PST are $226,654. 2005 premiums were $193,819. The proposed premiums therefore represent a 16.94% increase from the 2005 premiums. Please note that the 2006 budget reflects total insurance premiums of $208,822. As such, the proposed premiums would result in an over expenditure of $17,832. Reasons given for the premium increase are increased storm and natural catastrophe activity in 2005, increased Public sector losses in the past few years resulting from the frequency and severity of claims, escalating court costs, claims administration expenses and the ever increasing replacement costs of assets. In addition, insurers have been extremely cautious about public entity liabilities because of the continuing downloading of services by the Provincial Government, namely roads and ambulance services. Insurers are now experiencing the impact of the claims from these downloaded services and the impact they are having on the public entity portfolio. QL It is our understanding that beginning in December, 2005 and continuing throughout 2006, other municipalities have reported premium increases ranging from 30% to 150 %. Our local broker, who is the agent of record for municipal clients who are insured by all insurers advises that Oro - Medonte's proposed premium increase is the lowest for any of his clients. When proposals were last requested in 2004, the following quotes were received from other insurers: Ontario Municipal Insurance Exchange Jardine Lloyd Thompson Canada Limited $230,834 $254,537 Since their clients have experienced large increases in 2005 and 2006, proposals received from these two alternative sources for 2006 would reflect increases from the said 2004 premiums. Please note that proposals are now available from another insurer, B.F. Lorenzetti & Associates Inc. Based on the increases experienced by other municipalities, we respectfully recommend renewing our insurance coverage with Frank Cowan & Company for the period of July 1, 2006 to July 1, 2007and that proposals be requested in 2007, being the first year of the term of the new Council. 1. THAT Report No. TR2006 -14 be received and adopted. 2. THAT the Township of Oro- Medonte renew its insurance coverage for the period of July 1,2006 to July 1, 2007 with Frank Cowan & Company at the quoted premium of $226,654 including PST. Respectfully submitted, Paul Gravelle Treasurer C.A.O. Comments: Date: t C.A.O. Dept. Head ITEM FOR: SECTION: T ITEM NO. MEETING DATE: COUNTY OF SIMCOE CORPORATE SERVICES COMMITTEE Roads and Engineering CS 06 -092 June 14, 2006 SUBJECT: Transfer of Section of County Road 93 to the City of Barrie and the Township of Oro - Medonte RECOMMENDATION: THAT the necessary by -law be presented to County Council to remove a section of County Road 93 as described in Item CS 06 -092 from the County of Simcoe Road System and transfer ownership to the City of Barrie and the Township of Oro - Medonte. BACKGROUND: The section of County Road 93 to be transferred commences at the south limit of Lot 4 Concession 1 of the Township of Oro Medonte, to a point approximately 58 metres north of the Road allowance for Georgian Drive. This portion of County Road 93 was downloaded on April 1, 1997 to the County of Simcoe from the Ministry of Transportation. The land is described as: Part of PIN 58552 -0001 (LT), being part of Lot 6, Concession 1, WPR, and part of road allowance between the Townships of Oro and Vespra, now City of Barrie, being Part 1, Plan 51R- 34516, and Part of Lot 6, Concession 1, EPR, and part of road allowance between the Townships of Oro and Vespra, now Township of Oro - Medonte, being Part 2, Plan 51R -34516 and part of PIN 58553 -0001 (LT) being Part of Lot 4, Concession 1, WPR, and part of road allowance between Townships of Oro and Vespra, now City of Barrie, being Part 3, Plan 51R- 34516, and part of Lots 4 and 5, Concession 1, EPR, and part of road allowance between Townships of Oro and Vespra, now Township of Oro - Medonte, being Parts 4 and 5, Plan 51R- 34516, Please see schedule 1 for a map of the location. County Road 93 is a shared boundary road with the City of Barrie, the Township of Oro Medonte and the County of Simcoe. The municipal boundary runs down the centre line of County Road 93 with the County having ownership of the road allowance. With County ownership of the road allowance and being the upper tier municipality, all development on this section of County Road 93 is subject to the County Official Plan as well as entrance and set back by -laws. A subdivision plan was approved when the Ministry of Transportation had jurisdiction of the road. In 2002 the City of Barrie's Committee of Adjustment granted a minor variance to permit a reduction in the distance between a structure and the County Road allowance, regardless of the fact that County Staff objected to the approval of the minor variance. This property is located within the boundaries of the City of Barrie, but because this portion is a County Road, County by -laws apply, and as such the City of Barrie does not have the ' r June 14, 2006 Corporate Services Committee CS 06 -092 Page 2 authority to grant this minor variance. The request for the exception is a result of an appeal to the Ontario Municipal Board initiated by the County objecting to the minor variance granted by the City of Barrie, which would permit the exception for the existing residence. There was great confusion at that time between the planning departments for the City of Barrie and the County of Simcoe as to who had planning approval. With the increased development pressure at the east limits of the City of Barrie, it was decided that to prevent future disagreements between the City and the County planning departments and to prevent development applications from proceeding to the OMB, the best course of action was for the County of Simcoe divest this section of County Road 93 to the City of Barrie and the Township of Oro Medonte. It is recommended that approval be given to remove the section of County Road 93 from the County of Simcoe Road System and transfer ownership to the City of Barrie and the Township of Oro- Medonte. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS: The cost of the legal surveys of the roadway will be split two ways between the County of Simcoe and the City of Barrie. Both the City and the County will pay their own legal fees pertaining to the transfer. SCHEDULES: The following schedule is attached and forms part of this Item. Schedule 1- Map of Road Section. Schedule 1 for CS06 -092 PREPARED BY: Chris Doherty, Engineering Technician APPROVALS: Date: Rick Newlove, General Manager Corporate Services June 2, 2006 Thomas Evans, General Manager of Finance and June 7, 2006 Administration Mark Aitken, Chief Administrative Officer June 7, 2006 Schedule I for CS06-092 I p7svem County Road 93 f rom the County of Simcoe Road System OF Schedule 1 Corporate Services Committee CS 06 -162 The Corporation of the County of o ,rY ew �e Simcoe i Simcoe County Forests Recreation Policy June 2006 Simcoe County Forests in forestry since 19-92 Schedule 1 Corporate Services Committee CS 06 -162 Page 3 SIMCOE COUNTY FOREST RECREATION POLICY April 2006 A. SIMCOE COUNTY FOREST Introduction: The Hendrie Tract, 1,000 acres of wasteland in the former township of Vespra, became the first County Forest in Ontario in 1922. The first trees were planted on May 8 of that year on land that had been stripped of its native white pine, then burned and left to erode. Since that time, the Simcoe County Forest (SCF) has become the largest municipally owned forest in Ontario with nearly 30,000 acres under active management as of 2006. County Forests were purchased by the Corporation of the County of Simcoe and managed under long -term agreements with the Ministry of Natural Resources until 1996. Since that time, the County has been fully responsible for management. Intensive forest management has resulted in high value timber products, providing sufficient revenue to repay the management debt to the province and purchase approximately 2000 acres of additional forest since 1996. The SCF is debt free and does not rely on tax support. Revenue from timber sales has resulted in a substantial forest reserve account which is utilized for management expenses, to purchase additional forest lands and to assist in other County projects. The SCF has become recognized as an exceptional example of the benefits of sustainable, multi -use forest management. Land reclamation and timber management has also provided substantial environmental, social, and environmental benefits to the residents of Simcoe County. The development of this policy involved extensive public consultation beginning in the fall of 2005 with the publication of an initial Draft County Forest Recreation Policy. A series of five open houses, meetings, and advertising resulted in a substantial number of written submissions which have been considered. Further, a Public Advisory Group was established to aid in the refining of the Policy (Schedule E). Objectives: The Simcoe County Forest originated and evolved since 1922 with the following objectives: • Restore waste lands and marginal farm lands to productive use • Prevent soil erosion and restore and conserve water resources • Manage forests in a scientific manner to produce high -value forest products • Preserve, conserve and improve wildlife habitat Simcoe County Forest Recreation Policy Schedule 1 Corporate Services Committee CS 06 -162 Page 5 Criteria for Analysis of Recreational Activities: All activities within the SCF have some impact upon the forest and other users. While assessing the level of impact is subjective, the following criteria were applied to each: • Activity must have minimal environmental impact • Activity must not have significant impact upon other forest users; • Activity must be compatible with forestry operations; • Activity must not pose significant liability concerns to the County; • Activity should not require significant County staff intervention for administration or policing. C. RECREATIONAL ACTIVITIES The continued enjoyment of the various users will depend upon respecting the forest environment and the rights of others. A'Code of Conduct' has been adopted which applies to all those who wish to use and enjoy the Simcoe County Forest (Appendix C). Low Impact Activities: Most passive users of the SCF leave only footprints while taking away a host of benefits including healthy outdoor activity and improved peace of mind. Some outings and activities take place entirely within a forest tract while others may just pass through. Linear systems such as the Ganaraska and Trans Canada Trails provide linkages while trail loops on individual properties provide opportunities for more casual users. Both are important in providing opportunities for residents to get out and enjoy all that Simcoe County has to offer. Improving access to trails through improved coordination, mapping, signage, and promotion will best be accomplished by partnering with and supporting existing trails organizations. Recommendation 1.1 — THAT walking, hiking, cross - country skiing, snowshoeing, orienteering, geocaching, nature appreciation, nature study, dogsledding, and horseback riding be permitted in the SCF as per the Code of Conduct. Recommendation 1.2 — THAT partnerships be strengthened with existing trails organizations to promote trail use throughout the County. 2. Dog Walking: Many residents utilize the SCF as an area to exercise not only themselves but their pets. While this practice is generally accepted, large or aggressive dogs can be frightening and potentially dangerous for other users. Serious consequences can result particularly if uncontrolled dogs meet with equestrians. Suncoe County Forest Recreation Policy Schedule 1 Corporate Services Committee CS 06 -162 Page 7 5. Other Off -Road Motorized Vehicles (ORMV's): For the purpose of this report, an ORMV is defined as any motorized vehicle except snowmobiles designed for off -road use which is a maximum gross vehicle weight of 400kg. This largely includes all- terrain vehicles and motorcycles. The number of ORMV's utilizing County Forests has increased dramatically over the past few years for a number of reasons: • Increasing population levels • Increasing popularity of ATV's and off -road motorcycles due to improved technology • The finite or declining open space available for off -road vehicle use Most ORMV operators are respectful of the forest and other users. A number of ORMV enthusiasts have been coexisting with other forest users for many years with little problem, on vehicles which are designed for trail riding, operate relatively quietly, and are properly insured. However, where motocross bikes designed for racing utilize the forest, complaints of excessive speed, noise and dust are commonplace. Most often these users are also not properly insured. Concerns regarding ORMV's are expressed as either environmental degradation or conflicts with other users. An exhaustive study completed for the Ganaraska Forest found that while some compaction and erosion does occur on trails, the overall impact to a forest environment is minimal. Because they operate in spring, summer and fall, however, impacts on soil conditions can occur particularly in wet areas and stream crossings. Some operators actively seek out wet locations and cause severe rutting as a result. Damage to trails is also a concern to the local snowmobile clubs who are increasingly forced to repair damage caused during summer months. Conflict with other groups is mainly attributed in order of magnitude to noise, dust, danger, and fumes. Adjacent landowners are also objecting due to the amount of trespassing which occurs to access County Forest. Because SCF properties are numerous but scattered, ORMV users are currently using a combination of trails on private and public land, roads, ditches, and unopened road allowances to get from one Tract to the next. While unrestricted and unregulated use of ORMV's is problematic for jurisdictions throughout rural Ontario, significant benefits from increased tourism and outdoor recreation are possible with the proper controls. With sales increasing every year and without designated areas to operate these vehicles, trespassing, conflicts and damage to property will continue to escalate. Designated trails will provide an opportunity for users to become organized, insured, and implement a trail maintenance program. It is also hoped that by working with and promoting clubs, a volunteer warden program can assist County staff and police in directing traffic away from restricted areas and onto designated trails. Reduced environmental impact and user conflict should result. Simcoe County Forest Recreation Policy Schedule 1 Corporate Services Committee CS 06 -162 Page 9 • To facilitate large game retrieval (deer and bear) • To facilitate complete access to the SCF during the Controlled Deer Hunt only Recommendation 6.3 — THAT all hunters must be members in good standing with the Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters. Recommendation 6.4 — THAT only portable and temporary tree stands and ladders be permitted. Recommendation 6.5 — THAT further to Recommendation 6.1 hunting NOT be permitted on the following SCF tracts: • Dyer (City of Barrie) • Rippon (Village of Angus; Essa Twp) • Cook, Blauxham, (Innisfil Twp) • Museum, Midhurst (Springwater Twp) • Thompson (Penetanguishene) 7. Trapping At such time as the County assumed management responsibility from the Province, there were 7 trappers licensed by the Ministry of Natural Resources trapping within the County Forests. They were assigned areas with the understanding that, when they were finished trapping, the areas would not be reassigned and no further permits would be issued. Recommendation 7.1 — THAT no new permits for trapping be issued for County Forest properties. 8. Harvesting of Non -Wood Forest Products Gathering of mushrooms, fiddleheads and other naturally occurring edible and medicinal products has been growing substantially in popularity. While generally considered to be a healthy and harmless activity, there is growing concern among experts that over harvesting may be impacting the sustainability of some species in some locations. Working with naturalists and interested groups to educate users regarding appropriate harvesting practices will be investigated. Recommendation 8.1 — THAT the harvesting of non -wood forest products be permitted for personal use only; AND THAT the County reserves the right to restrict harvesting if warranted. Simcoe County Forest Recreation Policy Schedule 1 Corporate Services Committee CS 06 -162 Page 11 APPENDIX A — Simcoe County Forest Recreation Policy — Summary Activities Permitted Conditions: Walking; hiking Cross -count skiing; snowshoein Orienteering; eocachin Nature appreciation; nature stud Do sleddin Horseback riding Dog walking • Pets must be under control or on leash Mountain biking • No unauthorized trail construction Snowmobiling • On designated OFSC trails only* • Use Agreement and Permits are required Other off -road motorized vehicles • On designated OFATV or OFTR trails (ATV's; motorcycles) only* • Use Agreement and Permits are required • Maximum vehicle weight 400 k Hunting; fishing • As per provincial hunting and fishing regulations ** • Portable tree stands only • Hunters must be members of OFAH Trapping • License and Use Agreement required Harvesting non -wood forest products • Personal use only * Exceptions include: • use by OFATV, OFTR, or OFSC members where authorized to facilitate volunteer patrols or stewardship activities • to enable disabled or infirm hunters to access the SCF during all hunting seasons • to facilitate large game retrieval (deer and bear) • to facilitate complete access for hunters to the SCF during the Controlled Deer Hunt only * *Hunting is permitted except on the following tracts due to close proximity to urban areas: • Dyer (City of Barrie) • Rippon (Village of Angus; Essa Twp) • Cook, Blauxham, (Innisfil Twp) • Museum, Midhurst (Springwater Twp) • Thompson (Penetanguishene) Simcoe County Forest Recreation Policy Schedule 1 Corporate Services Committee CS 06 -162 Page 13 APPENDIX B - Implementation Strategy Simcoe County Forests occupy an area of approximately 30,000 acres divided amongst 150 properties with in excess of 500 vehicle access points. Achieving compliance will require a long -term and multi- faceted approach including education, partnerships, and enforcement. Working cooperatively with the public and various user groups to build awareness, assist with monitoring, and reduce conflicts will be critical. Timelines: A period of grace will help to ensure that users are provided an opportunity to adjust and enter agreements if required. Assuming that the policy framework is adopted in mid 2006 it is recommended that the implementation of most changes not occur until the 2007 season. Information / Education: Informing and educating the public about changes to the permitted uses of the SCF will take time, a varied approach, and consistent effort. A standard 'code of conduct' for trail users (Appendix C) will be adopted and widely disseminated. The following methods will be utilized to inform and educate users of the SCF: • The County website • Direct contact with all members of the public who provided comments • A news release • A public open house • Publication of a new SCF pamphlet • Completion of the SCF map book • Effective and consistent signage • Displays at events throughout the County (fall fairs) Stewardship: Many individual members of the public and organized groups have indicated a willingness to work cooperatively with County staff to assist with a range of activities. While some effort will be required to establish and maintain effective partnerships, it would assist staff tremendously in keeping abreast of issues and concerns. Reporting prohibited activities, garbage clean -up days, trail maintenance, and user education can all be accomplished more effectively with assistance from the public. Conflict Resolution: Uses, activities, and potential for conflicts will continue to evolve over time. Maintaining an advisory group to provide recommendations to resolve issues as required will be an important ongoing requirement. Schedule 1 Corporate Services Committee CS 06 -162 Page 15 APPENDIX C — Code of Conduct for County Forest Users These guidelines have been adapted from the Ontario Trails Council's user guidelines for shared -use trails with assistance from Huronia Trails and Greenways. General Rules of Etiquette • Expect and respect other trail users. • Keep to the right to allow other users to pass on your left. When stopping for a break, move to the side to allow others room to pass • Stay on the trail; don't create new trails. • Respect neighboring landowners by staying off private property, and avoid excessive noise. • Leave the trail as you found it; whatever you pack in, pack out. Leave the wildflowers and wildlife for others to enjoy. • Maintain control of your pets. Carry a leash for your dog and be prepared to use it. "Stoop & flick" when waste is on the trail path. • Use trails only according to the permitted uses indicated on the signage. Some trails are user specific i.e. hiking or snowmobile only trails. • Some trails may close seasonally or during forestry operations. Obey trail closure signs. • Most trails experience problems in the spring. Check the trail conditions. If you are leaving tracks over 1/2" deep don't use the trail. If there are no signs posted, but weather conditions have been bad, do not use the trail. Walkers & Hikers Remember that on shared use trails there are a variety of other users enjoying the trail with you. If you have children in your group make sure they are aware of any horses, dogs, bicycles or snowmobiles passing. When passing horses say "hello" to help the horse know you are not something scary. If approaching from the front, stop and let the horse and rider pass unless the rider indicates otherwise. When approaching from the rear, ask if it is OK to pass then proceed on the left. (Keep dogs leashed and close to you.) If you have a walking stick, do not raise it in the air, as the horse may think you are going to hit it. Keep control of your pets, particularly when sharing the trail with cyclists, children, horses or snowmobiles. Limit your group size to 20 hikers to keep from overwhelming other users. If you have a large group, let the other users know its size when passing them, e.g. "Passing on the left, 15 hikers and 2 dogs, may we go by ?" Don't walk in groomed cross - country ski tracks. Simcoe County Forest Recreation Policy Schedule 1 Corporate Services Committee CS 06 -162 Page 17 Always use the bridges supplied for crossing waterways. Some trails are for hikers only; respect those trails by only riding on trails for cycling. Use extra caution at access points and when crossing roads. X- Country Skiing Use common sense and personal awareness, particularly in intense cold or when sharing the trail with snowmobiles. Keep to the right to allow other users to pass to your left. Be alert for other trail users and ski in control, particularly when your vision of the terrain ahead is restricted. Always assume that there could be someone up ahead, and be prepared to stop. Do not ski late in the day. Plan to be off the trail by dusk. Carry sufficient wax, food, drink, and clothing for unexpected eventualities Keep track of your progress and where you are. For remote areas, leave your itinerary and expected return time with someone. Obey all posted signs and warnings. Keep off closed trails. Do not stop where you obstruct the trail or are not visible from above or at a bend. Before merging onto a trail, look both ways (particularly uphill), and yield to others. When going downhill or passing others, ski in control to avoid the persons below and beside you. The motion of X -C skiing may startle a horse. Do not scare horses by approaching silently, rapidly or waving your poles. When approaching from the front, stop and let them pass unless the rider indicates otherwise. If approaching from behind, alert the horse and rider from about 30 feet away with a friendly "hello ". Ask the rider the best way to pass. Snowmobile and ORMV Operators Be safety conscious. Be aware. Ride with care. Stay on the designated trails. Off riding can injure vulnerable plants, crops and wildlife. Enjoy wildlife viewing opportunities, but avoid stressing any species. Avoid sudden stops and starts and quick directional changes with acceleration. Slow down when your vision of the trail ahead is restricted, at night or over unfamiliar terrain. Always assume there could be other trail users ahead, and be prepared for a controlled stop. Keep your speed and engine rpm low and steady when approaching and passing other trail users, homes, etc. Simcoe County Forest Recreation Policy Schedule 1 Corporate Services Committee CS 06 -162 Page 19 APPENDIX D - Criteria for Motorized Trail Consideration Applications for trail routes shall be reviewed by County staff and the Simcoe County Forest Public Advisory Group or a subcommittee thereof. If the trail is deemed satisfactory and all conditions are met, a Use Agreement (Appendix E) will be presented to council. The Corporation of the County of Simcoe reserves the right to terminate Use Agreements in the event that the terms of the agreement are violated or the arrangement proves undesirable. Proposals for motorized use of specific trails within the Simcoe County Forests must meet the following criteria: 1. Ecological Sustainability The ecological impact of the trail must be minimal and not harm the environmental sustainability of the area. The applicable Conservation Authority, Severn Sound Environmental Association, Ministry of Natural Resources and /or County of Simcoe Planning Division may be consulted for opinion on ecological suitability. 2. Physical Sustainability The trail must be of suitable width and navigability for off -road vehicle use, and be able to withstand the human and natural forces acting upon them without unreasonably degrading the road allowance. Year - round trail stewardship is sought through cooperation between user groups. 3. Social Sustainability The rights of adjacent landowners and other affected parties must be taken into consideration, including concerns over dust, noise, and trespass to property. Conflicts with residential areas must be avoided whenever possible. Spatial separation and site specific characteristics, or the lack thereof, shall be given due consideration when selecting a trail location. 4. Compliance with Legislation The proposed trail uses must conform to all applicable legislation, including the provincial Highway Traffic Act, Ontario Regulation 316/03, Off -Road Vehicles Act, Motorized Snow Vehicles Act, Trespass to Property Act, and municipal by -laws. 5. Trespass to Property The proposed trail layout must not lead users to private property or utility corridors, unless specific written permission exists for use of the private or utility -owned lands. Deviation from an established trail is illegal under the Trespass to Property Act. 6. Tread Lightly Principles Proposed trail uses must be consistent with the principles and guidelines of the non - profit Tread Lightly organization which promotes land stewardship, safety in recreational sport, and environmental messaging. 7. Provincial Incorporation Motorized recreation clubs applying for permission to use the Simcoe County Forests must belong to a provincially incorporated association (e.g. Ontario Federation of All Terrain Vehicle Clubs, Ontario Federation of Trail Riders), and must have a permit system, trail warden system, trail maintenance program, and third party liability insurance. 9. Speed Limits Speed shall be limited to a maximum of 50 km /h in rural areas, and 20 km /h in urban or parkland areas. 10. Noise Limits and Spark Arrestors In order to ensure consistency with Ontario Regulation 316/03, no vehicle exhaust system shall be modified in such a manner that would result in increased noise emissions. The maximum allowable noise limit from any off -road vehicle is 94 dB and spark arrestors are required. Simcoe County Forest Recreation Policy Schedule 1 Corporate Services Committee CS 06 -162 Page 21 (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Event ") 3. The Association is responsible for all costs relating to maintaining and using the Property during the Term of this agreement. 4. The Association and the County agree that the Association shall pay the County a fee in the amount of $ plus GST for use of the land for the Event. 5. The Association acknowledges and agrees that the County has no obligation to maintain or repair the trails and/or bridges on the Property. 6. The Association acknowledges and agrees that all trails and/or bridges on the Property must remain open to the public and the public shall be allowed to use them without any fees being charged by the Association. 7. The Association acknowledges that neither it nor any of its members, employees or agents shall cut any trees, branches or brush without the approval of the County. Furthermore, the Association agrees that if the County consents to any cutting, such cutting must be completed so as to create as little damage to the natural vegetation as possible. Such consent shall be obtained from the County Forester or, in that person's absence, the County Forest Technician and can be either written or a verbal consent, at the discretion of the County. 8. The Association agrees that any cutting or other damage that in the opinion of the County has been caused by the Association or its members without the approval of the County shall be rectified at the Association's expense upon written notice by the County. 9. The Association shall be responsible for posting signage on all trails and/or bridges as outlined in paragraph 2 herein or, other signage as requested by the County. All signage shall be posted at the expense of the Association. 10. The Association agrees to indemnify save harmless, and waive all rights against the County from and against all suits and claims for loss, damage, accident, death or injury of any nature or kind whatsoever arising out of or connected with the use and maintenance of the Property or any preparation or construction of or on the Property by the Association, its members, employees, agents, or any other person using the Property. 11. If any tern of this agreement is breached by the Association then, at the option of the County this agreement may be terminated immediately upon written notice by the County. 12. In addition to the right of termination under paragraph 11 above, the County may at any time terminate this agreement upon thirty (30) days written notice to the Association. 13. The Association shall obtain liability insurance in the amount of Five Million Dollars ($5,000,000.00) showing the Corporation of the County of Simcoe as an additional insured Simcoe County Forest Recreation Policy Schedule 1 Corporate Services Committee CS 06 -162 Page 23 20. Any and all schedules attached hereto and initialled by the parties, form part of this agreement. THE CORPORATION OF THE COUNTY OF SIMCOE Warden Clerk We have the authority to bind the Corporation. XXX ASSOCIATION Per: _ Name: Title: Per: Name: Title: Me have the authority to bind the Association. Simcoe County Forest Recreation Policy Schedule i Corporate Services Committee CS 06 -162 • Willingness to serve in a voluntary capacity. A maximum of 12 members shall be comprised of the following general interests: • walking, hiking, snowshoeing, cross - country skiing; • mountain biking; • equestrian; • nature appreciation; • environmental protection; snowmobiling; off -road motorcycling; • ATV operation; • picking / gathering; • hunting. Structure: Page 25 The Public Advisory Group is an `ad hoc' committee which will sunset following completion of the mandate. The County Forester and /or Forest Technician will attend all meetings and assist as required. Activities: It is anticipated that the Public Advisory Group will meet face -to -face on a minimum of three occasions, will review documents and take part in telephone or email communications. Simcoe County Forest Recreation Policy s Fisheries and Nches at Oceans Canada Oceans Canada Small Craft Harbours Ports pour petits bateaux Central and Arctic Region Region du Centre at de i'Arctique 1 ! P.O. Box 85120 C.P. 85120 Your i* vane riferenee t } 3027 Harvester Road 3027, chemin Harvester t, F Suite 506 Bureau 506 Our file None reJerenua Burlington, Ontario Burlington, Ontario UR 4K3 VR 4K3 5882 'D' Cathew Bay Tel (905) 639 -6682 Tel (905) 639 -4330 5882 `D' Hawkestone Fax (905) 639 -5975 Fax (905) 639 -5975 May 10, 2006 Ms. Marilyn Pennycook Clerk Township of Oro- Medonte 148 Line 7 South Box 100 Oro, Ontario LOL 2X0 Dear Ms. Pennycook: r pV 1 ti TO OR ij 5 _ Re: Divestiture of Small Craft Harbours Facilities — Cathew Bav and Hawkestone Reference is made to recent telephone conversations between Mr. Mike MacDiarmid and Mr. Jerry Ball regarding the future of the Small Craft Harbours Program, specifically the divestiture of the harbours at Cathew Bay and Hawkestone, Ontario. As you may be aware, the Small Craft Harbours Program is undergoing a fundamental change. A broad -based review of departmental programs concluded that recreational harbours have little association with the department's core mandate. The review identified that these activities are best done by organizations and individuals more closely associated with tourism and recreation, specifically by those who benefit directly or indirectly from the economic and social advantages generated by such properties. In keeping with this finding, the February 1995 federal budget announced that this department will conclude its involvement with the more than 800 recreational harbours across Canada (401 in Ontario). The federal divestiture policy offers government assets sequentially to other federal departments and agencies, provincial governments, local governments, local community groups, and finally, through public tender, to the public at large. Past experience has indicated that it is unrealistic to expect any interest from another federal department or the province in these times of program reviews and deficit and debt reduction. In light of this and Small Craft Harbours' recognition of the "public" significance associated with many of these facilities, we look first and foremost to the local municipality to consider Canada c" - assuming ownership responsibility if the preservation of a public access point is important to the community. To facilitate the transfer of Small Craft Harbours facilities to municipalities, certain "flexibilities" have been approved which will allow consideration of the following: • Transfer to occur "as is" at nominal value (i.e. $1.00); • The Township continues operating the facility as a public harbour at essentially its current level of operation for a specified period of time (at least five years); • Should the Township cease to operate the facility or dispose of all or part of the facility within the covenant period, the Township would be required to reimburse to the federal government an amount equal to the appraised value of the facility at the time of transfer (frankly, this should not be of concern to the Township if it genuinely supports the facility as a public access point). For your information, we have enclosed an information packages for both of the facilities. Each package consists of a one page harbour profile, an aerial photograph as well as a property layout sketch. As discussed with Mr. Ball, we are prepared to consider funding for safety related repairs to the facilities, prior to them being transferred to the Township. Our staff is willing to continue to work with Mr. Ball, to co- operatively determine what repairs are necessary. We encourage Council to take the time and consider how the facilities fit into your future municipal plans, and whether the Township would have any interest in acquiring the Small Craft Harbours Branch holdings. If the Township is not interested in acquiring ownership of the facilities, we would appreciate your assistance in identifying any local non - profit association or First Nation group that may be interested in doing so. If no interest is found in maintaining either of the facilities for "public use ", we see no other option but to offer it to the general public through public tender, likely resulting in the loss of a public access point. You should know that developments coming from a December 1997 Supreme Court ruling (Delgamuukw vs. the Crown) concerning aboriginal title are still unfolding. We are attempting to clarify matters but suffice it to say that land claims or unextinguished Aboriginal title, if present, will necessitate consultation with the First Nations Peoples on any transfer. Canada To summarize our intentions in one document, we have enclosed a sample Transfer Framework Agreement which essentially outlines the responsibilities of Small Craft Harbours and the Township regarding the property transfers and the repair projects. It will be finalized and forwarded for the Township's signature once the extent of repairs have been agreed upon and the costs have been confirmed. We would welcome your comments and thoughts on the draft Agreement. We appreciate that the above may seem somewhat overwhelming, however, rest assured Small Craft Harbours is prepared to work with you and your staff to ensure successful completion of the harbour transfer in a timely manner. We look forward to receiving Council's general reaction to the above. If you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Yours sincerely, J a D.G. Blanchard Director Attach. M # CARTHEW BAY, ONTARIO (4554) MUNICIPAL JURISDICTION: Township of Oro - Medonte USE: Harbour of refuge Community wharf DESCRIPTION: • headblock and three floating docks • located on Lake Simcoe (Carthew Bay) • constructed prior to 1973 FEDERAL DFO INFRASTRUCTURE: Structure Condition Structure Condition floating docks fair shore protection good DFO PROPERTY OWNERSHIP: . 0.174 ha of property (land and water) with fee simple title SITE MANAGEMENT: • managed by the Township of Oro - Medonte • one year lease from 01 May 1996 to 30 April 1997 • nominal base fee or percentage of gross revenue returned to the Crown (whichever is greater) DIVESTITURE SCENARIO FAILING PROGRAM TRANSFER TO PROVINCE: . prime candidate for assumption of ownership responsibilities is the municipality ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: . one of two harbours leased to the Township of Oro - Medonte (the other harbour is Hawkstone) LOT 20 CONCESSION TOWNSHIP OF ORO ONSH4 /1 14 �� SERVICES ` 901 1071 1 711 v APPROACH ROAD 601 Fh ♦ -s FEDERAL PROPERTY LIMITS e" \♦ ♦ -01 CONC: PAD e e ♦ ♦ �-'- ♦ _ 3- FLOATS. e Fo 801 I ♦ ` O, ♦ ♦ e♦ DT 72 PART 1 A S 51R -4375. O 00 /e 410 1 rQ SIMCOE CARTHEW BAY LEGEND: ® GARBAGE DISPOSAL FIS FEDERAL IDENTITY SIGN EA�'. FEDERAL TITLE STATUS IS REVERSIONARY TO PROVINCE (O.M.N.R.1 AREA OF SCH PROPERTY 0.173iha. a cwia w ur"u`u°`"v viwn SMALL CRAB HARBOURS CENTRAL AND ARCTIC REGION m a REVISIONS: 07/14/93 - S.P.H. 07f21f94 - J.M.S. 12/17/97 - N.F.G. SCALE: CLASS: 1:500 C PROJECT: DESCRIPTION: COMPILED PROPERTY PLAN DRAWN: PR XP M.S.M. G.M.E. OATS: 06/03/92 13/11/97 LOCATION: CARTHEW BAY 4554 -PlA 1 4554 HAWKESTONE, ONTARIO (4632) MUNICIPAL JURISDICTION: Township of Oro - Medonte USE: Community wharf Harbour of refuge DESCRIPTION: • medium size community wharf used by local residents • located on Lake Simcoe • constructed prior to 1973 FEDERAL DFO INFRASTRUCTURE: Structure Condition wharf fair DFO PROPERTY OWNERSHIP: • 0.443 ha of property (land and water) with fee simple title SITE MANAGEMENT: • managed by the Township of Oro - Medonte • nominal base fee or percentage of gross revenue returned to the Crown (whichever is greater) DIVESTITURE SCENARIO FAILING PROGRAM TRANSFER TO PROVINCE: prime candidate for assumption of ownership is the municipality ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: one of two harbours leased to the Township of Oro - Medonte (the other harbour is Carthew Bay) e 00 k x m r+ n e � HIGH WATER MARK LAKE SIMCOE JAN. 20, 1983. t "e e "♦ S9. e ♦�Dk Seook e ♦' ♦ ; °._. _ .� , _. _ _. _ , .� ._ , _. _ = 67'51'0 0"W 134.41 v&0`99 '♦ \`�` \; 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 \ ♦'e ♦ �'� APPROACH . . . . . .� \ \e��, �`' WHARF . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ONSHORE SERVICES \ , ` \ a\ SAO * %, . 402. .CONCRETE WHARF 901 \ O 6 ♦. 401. 41 4S71 \\ pskS �— N67'51'00'W 89.916- N77'21'00 "E 2.527 AREA OF SCH PROPERTY 0.580 2 5 m HIGH WATER 983. FEDERAL TITLE STATUS IS REVERSIO' r.ia'.TO PROVINCE (O.M.N.R.) f15 OE PEGNES OL ET .&. SMALL CRAFT HAR80UPS CENTRAL AND ARCTIC REGION �y4 CR m � MAN OF SURVEY OF WATER LOT LOCATION IN LAKE SIMCOE, IN FRONT OF PART OF LOT 24, CONCESSION Xi, TOWNSHIP OF ORI COUNTY OF SIMCOF. RVe . DNCvNY mnwAn 20/08/97 - N.F.G. 1:500 1 R COMPILED PROPERTY PLAN 05/11/92 ( 20/08/97 HAWKESTONE ONTARIO TITLE STATUS IS FEE SIMPLE 4632 -PIC � 4632 TOWNSHIP OF -'RO- MEDONTE 2006 CAPITAL BUDGET FINANCED FROM OPERATING DESCRIPTION AMOUNT OTHER GRANTS FUND RESERVES ROADS CONSTRUCTION 13,000 Working Mill Pond Road - bridge to 6th 13,000 30,500 Working 4th Line N. Barrie Road 30,500 17,000 14th Line S. of Hwy 11 17,000 10,000 Working Mount St. Louis Rd. 7th to 8th 10,000 63,000 Working Broadview & Joy Ave., Bass Line 63,000 57,500 Foxmead Sideroad 57,500 244,500 14th Line N. of Hwy 11 244,500 45,000 13th N. of County Road 22 45,000 83,000 Public Works Ridge Road -11th to 13th 83,000 493,000 Line 3 - Horseshoe to Highland 493,000 235,800 Mount St. Louis Rd. 8th to 9th 235,800 25,000 Line 1 N of Horseshoe Valley Rd. 25,000 36,000 O'Brien Street 36,000 339,700 DCA Line 2 - S of Hwy 11 to Ridge Rd. 339,700 209,000 Gas Tax allocation Line 11 N. Cty Rd 22 Line 3 - Barrie Rd. to Hwy 11 209,000 1,929,000 643,000 1,286,000 Line 14 N. Barrie Road to Bass Lake S/R 244,300 244,300 150,000 Gas Tax allocation 10th Line Culvert Replacement 150,000 45,000 Line 15 Patch & Reciamite 45,000 8,000 DCA 6th Line Road Deviation - engineering 8,000 92 400 Mount St. Lours Rd -11th to 12th 92,400 ^ � �� a nom nnn 7QR 200 906.200 0 to CAPITAL FORECAST 2006 -2010 ROAD CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS PROJECT 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Milt Pond Rd - bridge to 6th 13,000 4th Line N. Barrie Road 30,500 14thLineS.ofHwyll 17,000 Mount St. Louis Rd. 7th to 8th 10,000 Broadview & Joy Ave.& Bass Line 63,000 Foxmead Sideroad 57,500 26,000 14th Line N. of Hmy 11 244,500 31,000 13th N. of County Rd. 22 45,000 29,500 Ridge Road - 11th to 13th 83,000 30,300 Line 3 - Horseshoe to Hi hland 493,000 Mount St. Louis Rd. 8th to 9th 235,800 111,400 15,300 Line 1 N of Horseshoe Valley Rd. 25,000 8,000 6,800 O'Brien St. 36,000 Cm-e2 - S. Hwy 11 to Ride 339,700 42,000 Line 11 N. - Cty Rd. 22 209,000 62,700 31,200 Line 14 N. Barrie Rd. to Bass Lake S/R 244,300 189,000 28,500 Line 3 Barrie Rd. to Hwy 11 11929,000 236,500 10th Line Culvert Replacement 150,000 Line 15 Patch & Reclamite 45,000 6th Line Road Deviation - Engineering 8,000 Mount St. Louis Rd 11th to 12th 92,400 Warminster S/R - Hwy 12 to 11th Line 82,500 Line 11 Barrie Rd to 15/16 S/R 165,000 Robinson St. 60,000 15,200 Trespass Rd. 65,000 17,100 5th Line - Cty Rd. 19 to Cty Rd. 23 286,000 80,000 9th Line 15/16 SR to HM 11 147,500 10th Line CtyRd 19 to Mt. St. Louis Rd. 165,000 Line 3 Hwy 11 to Rid a Rd. 242,000 Line 1 Barrie Rd. to Bass Lake SR 231,000 Peter St. 8th to 9th 77,000 Line 1 N.of Ridge Road 10,000 5th Line & Line 14 Overpass 92,000 4th Line S. Barrie Rd to 15/16 Sideroad 230,000 Line 3 Cty Rd 19 N 286,000 Line 10 Mt. St. Louis Rd to Warm. S/R 165,000 5th Line 15/16 to Highway 11 176,000 Line 12 Highway 11 to Ridge Rd 55,000 Paving Dead Ends off Lakeshore 150,000 7th Line at Ski Resort 85,000 Su arbush/ Horseshoe Valley 130,000 Debt Repayment 81,581 81581 81,581 4,370,700 1,506,481 1,240,181 1,358,581 0 0 0 CAPITAL FORECAST 2006 -2010 ROAD CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS PROJECT 2006 2007 2008 2009 20 00 FUNDING SOURCE Gas Tax Allocation Reserve Fund 359,000 227,700 147,500 350,000 Move Ontario Funding 737,300 COMRIF Funding 1,286,000 157,667 161,334 Debt Financing 643,000 Public Works Reserve 83,000 Working Fund Operating fund Development Char es Reserve Fund 116,500 798,200 347,700 772,414 348,700 620,347 311,000 778,581 230.00 4,370,7001 1,506,4811 1,240,18lj 1,358,5811 0 Member Communication `: 1k Association of Municipalities of Ontario 393 University Avenue, Suite 1701 �� {{ Toronto, ON M5G 1 E6 +--g Tel: (416) 971 -9856 • fax: (416) 971 -6191 '•1 ( email: amo @amo.on.ca To the immediate attention of the Clerk and Council June 20, 2006 — Alert 06/032 Canada and Ontario launch COMRIF "Intake Three" Issue:Today, the governments of Canada and Ontario announced the launch of the Canada - Ontario Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund ( COMRIF) "Intake Three ". Background: Intake Three will build on the successful intakes "One" and `Two" of COMRIF, and will provide the remaining 16 per cent, or over 93 million of federal- provincial funding through this initiative. COMRIF is a competitive, merit -based program. Difficult decisions will have to be made during this final intake approval process, as the total amount of funding requested will likely exceed the available allocation. Projects for Intake Three will be assessed using three criteria: health and safety, public policy priorities, and value for money, as outlined in the Intake Three Application Guidebook. Only those projects that best meet these criteria, including support for federal and provincial policy directions such as investing in regional water and sewage systems, sustainable water and sewage systems (i.e., full -cost recovery), reducing greenhouse gases, and economic development and increased waste diversion, will be selected for funding. As a result of funding provided by the governments of Canada and Ontario, investments were made for infrastructure improvements in 120 municipalities for Intake One and 88 municipalities for Intake Two for communities across Ontario. Projects that were not funded under Intake One or Two can be re- submitted under Intake Three. Municipalities are encouraged to review their infrastructure priorities against the Intake Three priorities and select a project to submit accordingly. Intake Three priorities criteria, application details, deadlines and supporting documents are available at http: / /www.comrif.ca, or by contacting the COMRIF Joint Secretariat at 1- 866 -306- 7827. While AMO is working in partnership with Canada and Ontario on the development, promotion and monitoring of the COMRIF program, AMO will not play any role in the assessment of project applications or the selection of projects for approval. COMRIF is a partnership between the Government of Canada, the Government of Ontario, and AMO. Through COMRIF, the governments of Canada and Ontario are each investing up to $298 million over five years to improve public infrastructure in small urban and rural municipalities throughout the province. With municipal contributions, COMRIF is expected to stimulate up to $900 million in infrastructure investments. Action: AMO will keep members informed of the status on COMRIF Intake Three. AMO continues to advocate for additional funding to address the significant infrastructure deficit at the municipal level of government. This information is available in the Policy Issues section of the AMO website at www.amo.on.ca For more information, please contact: Patricia Swerhone, AMO Senior Policy Advisor, at 416- 971 -9856, ext. 323. Canada Ontario Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund: Intake Three t. I t M, a # 5 Page I of I Fray rais , Help I Search I Site Map Home I What's New I FAQs I About Us I Contact Us A maximum of three bridges/culverts or roads per like bundle will be accepted. As set out in the COMRIF Agreement, less than half the amount of funding allocated for each of the first two intakes is available for Intake Three. Intake Three provides the remaining 16 per cent, or over $93 million of federal - provincial funding available through COMRIF. Municipalities considering submitting an unlike bundled project, must contact the COMRIF Joint Secretariat by email at info @comrif.ca or by telephone at 1-866-306-7827, Projects must also be supportive of federal and provincial policy directions such as investing in regional water and sewage systems, sustainable water and sewage systems (i.e., full -cost recovery), reducing greenhouse gases, economic development and increased waste diversion. http:// www. conirif .ca/eng /default.asp ?id =34 6/22/2006 Home. � Intake Three Agreement Intake Three Applications Intake Three Click hereto apply_onfing Intake Three closes at 5:00 p.m EST on Wednesday, September 13, 2006. Intake Two — - - -- — Intake Three BackG1rounder Intake One Letter from Co-chairs to Heads of Council COMRIF Visual Identity -- -- Intake Three, Priorities News Roam The priorities for COMRIF Intake Three are the same as Intake One and Two: Get E -mail Upstairs Local bridges Photo Gallery Local roads Events Solid waste management COMBIF Water Partners Wastewater Project Map Contribution What's New for Intake Three? Agreement Examples of projects that would likely score higher and lower have been Links provided in the Application Guidebook for each of the priority categories. >: Bridges and Roads Water Wastewater ■ Solid Waste Management A maximum of three bridges/culverts or roads per like bundle will be accepted. As set out in the COMRIF Agreement, less than half the amount of funding allocated for each of the first two intakes is available for Intake Three. Intake Three provides the remaining 16 per cent, or over $93 million of federal - provincial funding available through COMRIF. Municipalities considering submitting an unlike bundled project, must contact the COMRIF Joint Secretariat by email at info @comrif.ca or by telephone at 1-866-306-7827, Projects must also be supportive of federal and provincial policy directions such as investing in regional water and sewage systems, sustainable water and sewage systems (i.e., full -cost recovery), reducing greenhouse gases, economic development and increased waste diversion. http:// www. conirif .ca/eng /default.asp ?id =34 6/22/2006 `1 t 1C_ i TOWNSHIP OF ORO- MEDONTE :101 Z Dept. Report No.' To: COMMITTEE OF THE Prepared By: WHOLE PW2006 -10 Jerry Ball Subject: Department: Council Request for Speed Reduction Public Works C. of W. — Line 4 South _ Date: June 21, 2006 R.M. File #: Motion # T08 -25505 Roll #: Date: BACKGROUND: Correspondence dated April 7, 2006 (attached) was received from Ms. Irena- Wieslawa Szczebior requesting consideration being given to the following concerns on Line 4 South, from Hwy. #11 to the Ridge Road: Reducing the existing speed limit of 80 km /h to 50 km /h Reviewing the Noise By -law to assist with the level of noise from the industrial area Placement of "No Littering" signs along Line 4 South The 3.1 km. section of Line 4 South, from Hwy. #11 to the Ridge Road, is an asphalt road with an existing speed limit of 80 km /h. This section of Line 4 South provides access to 15 residential homes, two small businesses, and the Barrie Drive -In. There are also two businesses within the Industrial Park, which enter and exit via Line 4 South. ANALYSIS: A site inspection of Line 4 South was completed to review all entrances and sight distance for the existing 80 km /h speed zone. As Line 4 South has very little grade change within the 3.1 km. stretch, the safe sight stopping distance of 135 metres can be safely met. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing speed limit of 80 km /h remain status quo. The Noise By -Law was reviewed with Mr. Bruce Hoppe, Director of Building and Planning, to assist with the noise concerns raised by Ms. Szczebior. Upon review of By -Law No. 2005 -136, it was determined that there was no noise infraction being created by either of the two industries within the I c ` Industrial Park. Moreover, it is noted that a municipal noise by -law cannot restrict the usage of "back- up alarms ", as these alarms are legislated safety items for commercial vehicles under the Occupational Health and Safety Act. With respect to the littering concern, staff is aware that the existence of the Drive -In movie theatre contributes to litter in the area. In 2005, a Site Plan Agreement was approved by Council for a fourth screen and associated site works for this business. The refuse concern was raised by the Site Plan Committee and the owner installed additional garbage containers, indicating that employees have been directed to tidy refuse from the municipal ditches after the facility closes. Staff will contact the owner of the Drive -In movie theatre to ensure that employees are continuing to keep the area clear of any debris. To assist with the concern of littering along Line 4 South, an additional "No Littering" sign could be installed at the intersection of the Ridge Road to discourage any increase of garbage. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. THAT Report No. PW2006 -10 be received and adopted. 2. THAT the existing speed limit of 80 km /h on Line 4 South, between Hwy. #11 and Ridge Road, remains status quo. 3. THAT an additional "No Littering" sign be installed on Line 4 South at the intersection of Ridge Road. 4. AND THAT Ms. Szczebior be advised of Councils decision accordingly. Respotfully submitted, r Jerry Ball �� Public Works Superintendent 279 Line 4 South R. R. #1 Shanty Bay, Ontario LOL 2L0 April 7, 2006 Mayor Neil Craig and Council Members Township of Oro-Medonte P. O. Box 100 Oro-Medonte, Ontario LOL 1X0 Attention: Marilyn Pennycook, Clerk Dear Mr. Mayor and Council Members: f J.. T`1 �-fv In light of the increased traffic on Line 4 South between Highway 11 and the Ridge Road from the burgeoning industrial park as well as the construction of an additional 4`n screen to be built at the Shanty Bay Drive -In Theatre, along with numerous possible sales of land parcels along this stretch of road, all of which contribute to added noise, garbage and vandalism, I respectfully request the following: 1. Sianage• "No Littering" signs to be erected on Line 4 South both at the highway off ramp and at the Ridge Road to discourage the increased garbage from drive -in patrons seven months of the year. The signs posted near the drive -in still remain standing after winter. Will site plan controls for the new drive -in construction include more traffic congestion controls and more esthetic visual impact barriers than presently there? 2. Seed Reduction and OPP Patrols: A reduction in the speed limit along the stretch of road between Highway 11 and Ridge Road (to 50 km.) That the OPP local detachment be once again made aware of the noise, vandalism, trespassing, speeding and safety concerns along this stretch of highly traveled road, especially from Easter weekend through Thanksgiving weekend, and increasing police presence and patrols. Along with this are the trespassingthunting issues that occur on this stretch as well as the 5'h Line South during hunting season. Also noteworthy is heavy truck traffic causing safety, noise and environmental concerns. 3. Review of Noise Bylaw: With spring comes the increased noise, banging, spray painting emissions, lights, rumbling and beeping before dawn, 24 hours /day, six days week. These can be heard and felt inside a house with all windows/doors closed. Once again I respectfully request a review of the recent noise Bylaw 2005- 136 which appears to have changed to include intercoms, singing and shouting (how to monitor drive -in patrons, loud music, offensive language, what defines "shouting" - calling the cows home ?). Not included are any controls, restrictions on hours of operation on industrial noise, which is much more continuous, intrusive, all C Line 4 South between Hi2hway 11. and Ridge Road, Oro -2 pervasive, and disturbing to residents as noted in previous correspondence to Council. I enclose a copy of a letter from my physician (confidentiality requested based on medical nature) and copies of two recent articles on the physical and psychological effects ofnoise on human and animal behaviour. Many more medical -based articles on the effects of noise are available. The peaceful enjoyment of my property is now limited to Sundays. I respectfully request a review of the noise bylaws of other municipalities within Simcoe County as 1 had previously investigated in 2001 -2. Because of the potential of more industriat/commercial development along this road in the future, a bylaw to adequately protect citizens from the ill effects of all of the above would be beneficial to the peaceful co- existence of industry and residents. Thank you for your attention to these matters. 1 anticipate an early response to these suggestions. Sincerely, Irena -W. Versha Szczebior lvs Encl. a 1 qcN -1 Committee of Adjustment Minutes Thursday June 15, 2006, 9:30 a.m. In Attendance: Chairperson Lynda Aiken, Member Allan Johnson, Member Dave Edwards Member Michelle Lynch, Secretary- Treasurer Andy Karaiskakis Absent Member: Garry Potter 1. Communications and Correspondence None received 2. Disclosure of Pecuniary Interest None declared 3. Hearings: 9:30 Indian Park Association Plan M368, Lot 103 (Oro) In Attendance: Brad & Tracy McCutcheon, agent representing applicants, 9 Sugarbush Road Motion No. CA060615 -1 BE IT RESOLVED that: Moved by Allan Johnson, seconded by Dave Edwards "That the Committee hereby Grant Provisional Consent regarding Application 2006 -B -10 subject to the following conditions: 1. That three copies of a Reference Plan for the subject land indicating the severed parcel be prepared by an Ontario Land Surveyor be submitted to the Secretary- Treasurer; 2. That the applicant's solicitor prepare and submit a copy of the proposed conveyance for the parcel severed, for review by the Municipality; 3. That the severed lands be merged in title with 9 Sugarbush Road, and that the provisions of Subsection 3 or 5 of Section 50 of The Planning Act apply to any subsequent conveyance or transaction involving the subject lands; 4. That the applicants solicitor provide an undertaking that the severed lands and the lands to be enhanced will merge in title; Committee of Adjustment -June 15, 2006 Page 1 cl�o\ 5. That all municipal taxes be paid to the Township of Oro - Medonte; and, 6. That the conditions of consent imposed by the Committee be fulfilled within one year from the date of the giving of the notice. .....Carried." Committee of Adjustment -June 15, 2006 Page 2 9:40 Doug Shelswell & Wayne Shelswell 2006 -B -11 Conic. 14, West Part Lot 18 (Oro) 191 Line 13 South In Attendance: Doug Shelswell, applicant Motion No. CA060615 -2 BE IT RESOLVED that: Moved by Dave Edwards, seconded by Michelle Lynch "That the Committee hereby Defer Consent Application 2006 -B -11 to allow time for the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food to comment on this application. .....Carried." Committee of Adjustment -June 15, 2006 Page 3 9:50 Horseshoe Valley Lands Ltd. 2006 -B -12 Conc. 4, Part Lots 3 & 4, RP 51R- 30671, Parts 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 18, 19, and 22 (Oro) In Attendance: Martin Kimble, representing Horseshoe Valley Lands, Ted Onyschuk, 36 Tanglewood Cresc. Motion No. CA060615 -3 BE IT RESOLVED that: Moved by Michelle Lynch, seconded by Allan Johnson "That the Committee hereby Grant Provisional Consent regarding Application 2006 -13-12 subject to the following conditions: 1. That three copies of a Reference Plan for the subject land indicating the severed parcel be prepared by an Ontario Land Surveyor be submitted to the Secretary- Treasurer; 2. That the applicant's solicitor prepare and submit a copy of the proposed conveyance for the parcel severed, for review by the Municipality; and, 3. That the conditions of consent imposed by the Committee be fulfilled within one year from the date of the giving of the notice. .....Carried." Committee of Adjustment -June 15, 2006 Page 4 10:00 Susan Roubos Plan 1230, Lot 7 (Oro) 1644 Ridge Road East In Attendance: Susan & Steve Roubos, owners -- Motion No. CA060615 -4 BE IT RESOLVED that: Moved by Allan Johnson, seconded by Dave Edwards C, --- .: "That the Committee hereby Grant Provisional Consent regarding Application 2006 -B -13 subject to the following conditions: 1. That the retained parcel's total lot area be increased from 0.17 ha (0.42 ac) to 0.2 ha (0.49 ac) in order to satisfy the minimum lot area standard for the Residential One (R1) Zone, as stated in the Township Zoning By- law, as amended; 2. That three copies of a Reference Plan for the subject land indicating the severed parcel be prepared by an Ontario Land Surveyor be submitted to the Secretary- Treasurer; 3. That the applicant's solicitor prepare and submit a copy of the proposed conveyance for the parcel severed, for review by the Municipality; 4. That the severed lands be merged in title with Lot 7 Plan 1230 and that the provisions of Subsection 3 or 5 of Section 50 of The Planning Act apply to any subsequent conveyance or transaction involving the subject lands; 5. That the applicants solicitor provide an undertaking that the severed lands and the lands to be enhanced will merge in title; 6. That all municipal taxes be paid to the Township of Oro- Medonte; 7. That the conditions of consent imposed by the Committee be fulfilled within one year from the date of the giving of the notice; and, 8. That the applicants verify that the sewage system meets the minimum required setbacks as per Part 8 of the Ontario Building Code to the satisfaction of the Building Department. .....Carried." Committee of Adjustment -June 15, 2006 Page 5 Gc, _ lr; 10:10 Carol & Jeremy Kurtin 2006 -A -15 Conc. 6, Part Lot 21, RP 51R- 17288, Part 1 (Oro) 172 Line 6 South In Attendance: Jeremy Kurtin, applicant Motion No. CA060615 -5 BE IT RESOLVED that: Moved by Dave Edwards, seconded by Allan Johnson "That the Committee hereby Approve Minor Variance application 2006 -A -15 subject to the following conditions: 1. That the size of the proposed detached workshop /garage be no larger than 133 m2 (1,440 ft2); 2. That the appropriate building permit be obtained from the Township's Chief Building Official only after the Committee's decision becomes final and binding, as provided for within the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P. 13; 3. That the setbacks be in conformity with the dimensions as set out in the application and on the sketches submitted with the application and approved by the Committee; and, 4. That all municipal taxes be paid to the Township of Oro - Medonte ....Carried." Committee of Adjustment -June 15, 2006 Page 6 U1 tCA 10:20 Jeff Johnston 2006 -A -16 Conc. 11, East Part Lot 4 (Oro) 2666 Line 11 North In Attendance: Jeff Johnston, applicant, and Denis Johnston Motion No. CA060615 -6 BE IT RESOLVED that: Moved by Michelle Lynch, seconded by Allan Johnson "That the Committee hereby Approve Minor Variance Application 2006 -A -16 subject to the following conditions: 1. That the height of the detached garage not exceed 6.7 metres (22 feet) in accordance with the architectural drawings submitted with the application; 2. That an Ontario Land Surveyor provide verification to the Township of compliance with the Committee's decision by verifying in writing that the garage be no higher than 6.7 metres (22 feet); 3. That the appropriate building permit be obtained from the Township's Chief Building Official only after the Committee's decision becomes final and binding, as provided for within the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P. 13.; 4. That all municipal taxes be paid to the Township of Oro - Medonte; and, 5. That all setbacks and dimensions be in conformity as set out in the application and on the sketches submitted with the application and approved by the Committee. .....Carried." Committee of Adjustment -June 15, 2006 Page 7 "It , 10:30 Marion Tilstra 2006 -A -13 Plan M30, Lot 15, RP 51 R- 33067, Part 19 (Oro) 19 Seneca Lane In Attendance: Marion Tilstra, applicant Motion No. CA060615 -7 BE IT RESOLVED that: Moved by Dave Edwards, seconded by Allan Johnson "That the Committee hereby Approve Minor Variance Application 2006 -A -13 subject to the following conditions: 1. That the setbacks be in conformity with the dimensions as set out in the application and on the sketches submitted with the application and approved by the Committee; 2. That the footings are a minimum 1.2 metres below ground surface (i.e. below potential frost penetration) and into native ground; 3. That all backfill for the foundation walls be placed and compacted to 95% of Standard Proctor Maximum Dry Density, to the satisfaction of the Township Building Department and/or Engineering Department; 4. No fill or backfill materials be pushed beyond the proposed building area closer to the slope; 5. The roof leaders from the proposed addition be directed to and down the slope via a lined channel or carried in a pipe fashion on the surface down to the toe of the slope in order to avoid any potential concerns with respect to surface erosion from discharge from the roof runoff; 6. The area of fill be terraced and landscaped to minimize surface erosion and creep in the long -term; 7. That no structures be constructed on the fill; & The mature vegetation on the slope in the northwest corner of the property be maintained as it assists in maintaining a stable slope and minimizing surface erosion; 9. That the appropriate building permit be obtained from the Township's Chief Building Official only after the Committee's decision becomes final and binding, as provided for within the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P. 13; and, 10. That all municipal taxes be paid to the Township of Oro - Medonte. Committee of Adjustment -June 15, 2006 Page 8 5. Other Business t�f m i. Adoption of minutes for the May 11, 2006 Meeting Motion No. CA060615 -8 Moved by Allan Johnson, Seconded by Dave Edwards "That the minutes for the May 11th 2006 Meeting be adopted as printed and circulated ...Carried." 6. Adiournment Motion No. CA060615 -9 Moved by Dave Edwards, Seconded by Michelle Lynch "We do now adjourn at 11:50 a.m." ... Carried." (NOTE: A digital recording of this meeting is available for review.) Chairperson, Lynda Aiken Secretary- Treasurer, Andy Karaiskakis, ACST(A) Committee of Adjustment -June 15, 2006 Page 9 TOWNSHIP OF ORO- MEDONTE REPORT \�O - Dept. Report No. To: Prepared By: RC 2006 -06 Council Chris Carter Subject: Department: Council Grant request for Recreation and playground equipment - Community Services Date: C. of W. Guthrie P.S. June 21, 2006 R.M. File #: Motion Date: Roll #: 11BACKGROUND: At their meeting of February 15, 2006, Council received a deputation from the Guthrie Home and School Group requesting a financial contribution to assist with the construction of a new Playground at Guthrie Public School (Attachment #1). The subject property is owned by the Simcoe County District School Board and the SCDSB authorized the plans submitted. During the 2006 budget deliberations it was recommended that the request be deferred, given the Recreation Technical Support Committee was in the process of developing a policy re: Funding of Capital Park Improvements /Developments for Council consideration. Policy POL -PR -03 was enacted by Council on May 17, 2006 (Attachment 2) and addresses capital funding of projects on lands not owned by the Township of Oro - Medonte and direct all such request to Council. kCA t ANALYSIS: The group was advised of the policy and it was suggested that they submit a Subsidy /Grant application for Council consideration (Attachment #3). The group is requesting a grant of $4,000.00 to assist them with the construction of a playground. For comparison purposes staff investigated other similar request for funding on lands not owned by the municipality. The review included the approach and outcome of other past request. The criteria utilized with respect to other requests were; • Ownership of the subject lands • the hours of operation • the benefit to the neigbourhood /community • the availability to the general public • an analysis of the surrounding facilities • the geographical location • the community being served • maintenance It was determined that the property is located on private property (owned by the SCDSB). Unlike the Village Green facilities, the equipment will not be available to the general public on a "24/7" basis (school hours and duration of school year - September to July poses complications). The location is not suitable for a community /neighbourhood park (ie: minimal residential housing in the area, not in walking distance for residents, highway poses concerns. The maintenance of the equipment would be the responsibility of the School Board. After much consideration it is staff recommendation that a grant not be approved. -2- RECOMMENDATION(S): 1. THAT Report No. RC 2006 -06 be received and adopted. 2. THAT the request for a Subsidy /Grant for the Guthrie Home and School Group not be approved. 3. AND THAT the Guthrie Home and School Group be advised of Council decision. Respectfully submi -Chris Carter Manager of Recreation and Community Services C.A.O. Comments: C.A.O/ Date C\ v� Dept. Head -3- Deputation to A A Oro - Medonte Township Council Wednesday February 15, 2006 j. • • Guthrie Home & School \ kc� Deputation to Oro- Medonte Township Council Wednesday February 15, 2006 10 Mr. Mayor, Deputy Mayor and Council, my name is Laurie Fors and I am Past President of Guthrie Home and School, the parents' group at Guthrie Public School. I am here tonight to ask for financial assistance for the construction of a new playground at Guthrie School. The basic structure of the playground currently at Guthrie School was erected in 1972. Additions and changes have been made since then, but what is there today is essentially 30 years old. It has been inspected annually by representatives from the Simcoe County District School Board and 2 years ago the slide failed the inspection, was decommissioned, and later removed. A new playground, or additions to the current playground was always on the wish list of the parents' group, but more immediate and smaller projects always claimed our resources at budget time. The decommissioning of the slide made us think about what would happen if the entire playground was taken down. There are many benefits of a playground in a school yard. A playground provides opportunity for physical activity that we know is so important to improve physical fitness. We know that active, busy children are more likely to play co- operatively and do better academically. We are well aware through the Township Parks and Recreation Programs that this Council is well aware of and supports such initiatives. At this point, we began to work on a new playground in earnest. When we began to look at the playground issue a committee consisting of parents and 41 administration was formed. This is the basic process we followed: ♦ Parents were surveyed as to their desire for a new playground and suggestions were requested as to what this playground might look like. ♦ Committee members sought out catalogues and information from various suppliers. ♦ Administration divided staff into work groups to identify criteria from which we could judge various playgrounds, list priorities for a local playground and even look through catalogues to find examples of features which would provide the most enjoyment to the most students. ♦ Committee members toured other playgrounds in school yards and municipal parks and any interesting playgrounds between Alliston and Gravenhurst. ♦ The committee then narrowed the list of preferred builders and invited them to submit plans which fit our general and specific criteria. For example, a school playground should allow many students to use it at once. Swings are not usually included. We also wanted a structure that would allow for several entrance and exit points. If, for instance, a structure had only stairs up and a slide down, when used by several students at once, a students not wanting to slide could cause a traffic jam. ♦ The committee reported to the parents' group on a regular basis and comments were invited from staff and parents before the parents' group decided on a formal plan. ♦ The playground that was decided upon costs $40,819.00. A copy of the drawing and • plans are on the pink pages in your package. I won't go over the drawings unless requested. ♦ Authorization from Simcoe County District School Board (SCDSB) was sought and obtained for the plans submitted. il<:-,-- Once we realized that we had parental support for a new playground, plans were made to fundraise. We made major cuts from our 2005 -2006 school year parents' group budget to allow funds to be allocated to the playground this year. Administration allocated all funds raised from Vesey bulb sales last year to go towards the playground. Some existing fundraisers were expanded, and new ones added. We applied for a grant from Honda Canada, which we did not receive. We did a mailing out to all businesses listed on the Oro Medonte Chamber of Commerce website, requesting donations in exchange for a charitable receipt and recognition and included forms families could take to businesses they frequent, may own, or work for. Our group decided at this point that we would advertise to parents and to the business community that there would be a summer 2006 build. Here are some fundraising examples: ♦ Weekly pizza sales ♦ Daily milk sales ♦ Harvey's lunch sales *" ♦ Chamber of Commerce Members mailing ♦ Vesey Bulb sales ** ♦ Concession stand at SCDSB Elementary Football Tournament ** ♦ Guthrie Gryphon bracelet sales ** ♦ Magazine sales ♦ Bake sales ** ♦ Concession stands at various school functions. • ** New fundraiser, started for playground. When considering our current bank balance and projected income from all our fundraisers, we are still coming up short. We feel that our parent population has supported our fundraisers as well as they can and that it is not fair to ask for even more support. The playground costs $40,819.00, including taxes, shipping and installation. This does not include site preparation, but we will look after that. We have already raised 50% of this amount. The playground at Guthrie School is available for use by local residents evenings and weekends during the school year and all summer long. There are no other playgrounds in the community of Guthrie and the surrounding area. My personal experience includes attending my child's baseball practices at Guthrie School, where I always observe children using the existing playground. A new playground would benefit many local taxpayers. We have worked hard to this end but need some help with this project. We wish to acknowledge the support of administration and staff of Guthrie Public School. Melody Northrop, principal, is here to answer any questions you may have. We realize that Oro - Medonte funds playground equipment on a 50/50 basis. We expect that council may have a number of similar requests before them. However we already have raised 50% and in the event that Council is unable to fund this project by 50 %, we welcome any contributions that can be made. We feel it is vital that this project is completed this year. Thank you for your kind consideration of this matter. 0 • i u r rr 9 ! PAM, mon a N� Model.Mo. PFg6+{25Ri J` ,...; °' nded •_9i�;(1 ,: ; MAY nsz flgs Model # PF06425R1 Guthrie Public School -6" [17.2M] -0" [ 15. 01 23456178910 15' TLl� RecnmmNded Proleclive Surface tam O 1 2 3 4m 00 / I .R Double Poly Slide 4' Senior Stepladder 5' Poly Slide Plastic Hood . \ O, St rgale Slide Veer Left 5' Meteor Shower 5• \ Rockwall Gear Panel Climber 4' It Tidal Wave Link Pipe Ladder 3' Jungl!Net Rippled 2 Jump � \,\ Spider Net \� TheN past to M � Ingroand Nelaaad -______ l O eto / / Rappel Wall 5' :obro Climber 4' Deck to G.rk 1 \ el / MI - Berline' Net boa 6a. tt MsrRTSgI OseC. 561ea6, WAeO, CM4bk W 466. TILL r 1.600.2655462 6A%: 519.426.1132. Atl / / i 86 42' -0" [12.8M] AWARNING pest User ,Ng, S 1. 1� Atre55ibilitr None nC lour: C.M. Surfacing Typg; Sand Border Area 2196 Border Perimeter 178 InSlnllotion Style' "Weground Camnllonce' CAN /CSA -Z614 Saks RG2 J.N. M... ay: R.11, Odle prawn: Yarn 29, 21106 Rereed RY: RN. ReMim Rule: We 1, zoo* 46' -Y [14.1M] a IIr ACPAaplrf0 N .WY waY NINg11 m1q MlgroVµ. IMrt f /yam x A6 All Iwdcr �oW. a w plaids h rmMa. Y pMY flruct we ainwnivn centre -la- cmlm vl IM Iroale ae pvcU4a. uNrlS lt bk.0 cvlbra of vY lelaq�vm, hydro. . aM v v. a .�1 c leaaM rl y aIM a rMPalm mrVJ by IM .I IP oy grl4pk n W l an, goy l M <M wa ' Io1Na Ih p Pr.pinla r<aii <nl awtO[uMf and sefaly aw1e9 to Irwel IM n pu2614 1 /C 0'X11 Ilk blv9 01487 w r 148) (t6A1 r.kosaA ( ) nk one plvaMO61 Me1MMU1 A. N1 M Noparly paPwea to vmerfvn Nac v pxxk Prk 1. InetawL'm. MM'.. P<crealian aawma IM pbrryovM 'xnldbr ails Iws rolnwl foil and di)grq [vnailivns. l of I o"t . eand,.11 c.<nw�� u nl Li.Jma M1w a C.A Irvtmenl Iv cpNl_d pmvct derel.. 1 J d Yryxewmenl d IMrelwa x um r IP bnP, d m fi wv . and pdk vwns wlhaul mlic.. •NIwdY�n: amea I.1 jtksvt 1.m [ are odjucml but auleitle of lM —l-(Y ' yea mu—M ab 1. boa d Y abslodes pe . "Ilk w b �Y dole PeaeeNkn bollie lle. nY IM aar.ly _5 oudoce area. Na- emroactamnl { ikks Ihu, -4 Wi"`k lM elela aurloca v ual M Irea 1 H C;6 elklocks,Iaa M... ay: R.11, Odle prawn: Yarn 29, 21106 Rereed RY: RN. ReMim Rule: We 1, zoo* 46' -Y [14.1M] a IIr ACPAaplrf0 N .WY waY NINg11 m1q MlgroVµ. IMrt f /yam The Township of Oro - Medonte Policy' Funding of Capital Park Improvements /Development Section Subject Page 1 of 1 Policy # P Policy U3 Parks and Funding of Capital Park Enacted By Council; Recreation Improvements /Developments May 17, 2006 Purpose To establish guidelines for funding capital park improvements /developments on Township owned Public Parkland. Policy Township Owned Parkland All capital park improvements /developments on Township owned Public Parkland are to be approved by Council a) Requests Initiated by Public Requests for capital park improvements /developments initiated by the public and that have been approved by Council are subject to funding in a ratio of: 50 percent funding commitment from residents requesting the improvements; and 50 percent from the Recreation Capital Projects Budget; This funding ratio may be varied at the discretion of Council. b) Projects Initiated by Council Projects for capital park improvements /developments initiated by Council may be funded 100 percent from the Recreation Capital Projects Budget. Lands not owned by the Township of Oro - Medonte Park improvements /developments on lands not owned by the Township of Oro- Medonte will not be funded as part of the Recreation Reserves. All such requests for funding are to be directed to Council as a separate request. NOTE: GRANT /SUBSIDIES ARE NOT AUTOMATICALLY RENEWED EVERY YEAR. NOTE: ORGANIZATIONS MAY BE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. NOTE: If additional space is required to complete your information, please use the attached sheet. Grant/Subsidy Request Amount PART A — Organization Name and Address Information Organization Name Address 5: R ;I $ `TC'C'C%, CJ C, G City G ro iGth o n Prov. (� ( Postal Code i C�L a F_ c% Contact La a r i r'C3 ES Telephone V i7 - f 3 ! q E -mail '4rf^ G - VmPati CO.Co Fax t�U� � �— � %o PART B — Organization General Information Number of Out of Town Membership Fee Members t { { f }� ({ I Residents — If Applicable Geographic Area Date Served rG 4'I %V1CP` G'f Formed Outline the mission, purpose and objectives of your organization. 0LI (on fl' ylI- � 'YID eLLca ±'U'Ctt ex.p'eY-6)rlces GT our 1 LA � S e'f _ !'�1 G r u{ i?" e s ! A m YC t C� > T� sT Sri 't 0 ion " 1 t . Type of Organization (i.e. Registered Charity, Non -Profit Organization, no status, etc.) and registration number if applicable. 4l Other Sources of Revenue (include amounts that have been received or that are anticipated - other grants /subsidies, private funding, etc.). 0 c or) < c' 1 `' bi/I (b SCi(e5 Purpose for which the current grant /subsidy, if approved, would be used. Give complete details (i.e. project or event description, time frame, community benefits). Do you currently receive other grants or subsidies from the Township (facility subsidization, photocopying, secretarial, etc). Previous grants /subsidies from the Township? /% a e. Amount Requested Amount Approved: Year of Request: Year of Approval: PART C- Signature of Authorized Official(s) !e_ P)Lt6f pr sVClef -t +4 For office use only Approved: Amount $ Date: t Date: Denied: Date: NOTE: Personal information contained on this form is collected pursuant to the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act, and will be used for the purpose of determining eligibility for grants. Questions about this collection should be directed to the Freedom of Information Co- ordinator, The Corporation of the Township of Oro iMedonte, 148 Line 7 South, Box 100, Oro, Ontario. LOL 2X0 Please use this additional sheet ( and attach more if required) Grant /Subsidy Application Form. Outline the mission, purpose and objectives of your organization. 11 C' -\ Gk to complete the information requested on the Type of Organization (i.e. Registered Charity, Non - Profit Organization, no status, etc.) and registration number if applicable. Other Sources of Revenue (include amounts that have been received or that are anticipated — other grants /subsidies, private funding, etc.). Purpose for which the current grant/subsidy, if approved, would be used. Give complete details (i.e. project or event description, time frame, community benefits). Do you currently receive other grants or subsidies from the Township (facility subsidization, photocopying, secretarial, etc.). Previous grant /subsidies from the Township? Amount Requested: Year of Request: Amount Approved: $ Year of Approval: