Loading...
06 15 2006 C of A Agenda Committee of Adiustment Aqenda Thursdav June 15, 2006, 9:30 a.m. 1. Communications and Correspondence 2. Disclosure of Pecuniary Interest 3. Hearings: 9!30 2006-B-10 Indian Park Association Plan M368, Block 103 (Ora) . 9:40 2006-B-11 Doug Shelswell, Wayne Shelswell Cone. 14, West Part Lot 18 (Ora) 191 Line 13 South 9:50 2006-B-12 Horseshoe Valley Lands Ltd. Cone. 4, Part Lots 3 & 4, RP 51 R- 30671 Parts 9-11 18 19 22 Part 8 (Oro) 10:00 2006-B-13 Susan Roubos Plan 1230, Lot 7 (Ora) 1644 Ridge Road East 10:10 2006-A-15 Carol & Jeremy Kurtin Cone. 6, Part Lot 21, RP 51 R-17288 Part 1 (Ora) 172 Line 6 South 10:20 2006-A-16 Jeff Johnston Cone. 11, East Part Lot 4 (Oro) 2666 Line 11 North 10:30 2006-A-13 Marion Tilstra Plan M30, Lot 15, RP 51R-33067, Part 19 (Oro) 19 Seneca Lane 4. Decisions ., 5. Other business -Adoption of minutes for May 11, 2006 Meeting . 6. Adjournment , Township of Oro-Medonte Committee of Adjustment Planning Report for June 15, 2006 Indian Park Association 2006-B-10 Plan M368, Block 103 (Oro) THE PROPOSAL . The purpose of application 2006-B-10 is to permit a lot addition/boundary adjustment from Indian Park Association to 9 Sugarbush Road. The land to be severed and conveyed to 9 Sugarbush Road is proposed to have a lot frontage of approximately 13 metres (42.6 feet), a lot depth of approximately 53 metres (173 feet), and a lot area of approximately 686.5 m' (7,390 ft'). The land to be retained by Indian Park Association, Plan M368, Block 103, would have a lot area of approximately 2.5 hectares (6.27 acres). No new building lots are proposed to be created as a result of the lot addition. MUNICIPAL POLICY, ZONING AND PREVIOUS APPROVALS Official Plan Designation - Sugarbush Settlement Node - Residential Zoning By-law 97-95 - Block 103 - Open Space Exception (OS'74) Zone 9 Sugarbush Road - Residential One (R1) Zone Previous Applications - AGENCY COMMENTS (space is provided for the Committee to make notes) Simcoe County- Public Works Department- Building Department- Engineering Department- No Concerns PLANNING DEPARTMENT BACKGROUND The applicant is proposing a boundary adjustment to convey and add approximately 686.5 m' (7,390 ft') to a neighbouring residential lot that contains a dwelling on the property located on 9 Sugarbush Road. The purpose of the adjustment is to include mature trees and green space to be associated with the residential lot on 9 Sugarbush Road. The land to be retained by Indian Park Association would have an area of approximately 6.27 acres, which is currently vacant. .. OFFICIAL PLAN The subject lands are designated Residential within the Sugarbush Residential Node. The policies applicable to Sugarbush are silent with respect to severances and new development. OPA #17 which was a general Amendment to the Official Plan was adopted by Council in August 2003 and approved by the County of Simcoe on November 10, 2004 and subsequently has been appealed. OPA #17 proposes the following new section for the Committee's reference: "Boundary Adjustments A consent may be permitted for the purpose of modifying lot boundaries, provided no new building lot is created. In reviewing an application for such a boundary adjustment, the Committee of Adjustment shall be satisfied that the boundary adjustment will not affect the viability of the use of the properties affected as intended by this Plan. In addition, the Committee of Adjustment shall be satisfied that the boundary adjustment will not affect the viability of the agricultural parcels affected." While it is recognized that OPA#17 is not in effect, it does function as a statement of Council policy. ZONING BY-LAW The subject lands are zoned Open Space Exception (OS*74) in Zoning By-law 97-95. This zone permits a wide range of passive and active recreational uses and does not require a minimum lot area or frontage. Exception 74 states 'notwithstanding any other provision in this By-law, buildings or structures, except for those required for flood or erosion control, are not permitted on the lands denoted by the symbol *74 on the schedules to this By-law'. ANALYSIS Given the limited policy basis available to consider this application, the following two questions provide a good basis to assess the proposed consent: Will the proposed severance compromise the ability of the severed parcel to be used for Open Space purposes? No. As noted in the Zoning By-law assessment, exception 74 does not permit the construction of buildings or structures on the parcel to be conveyed to 9 Sugarbush Road. It should be noted that the applicants intend to use these lands for personal recreational uses, Le. lands for their kids to play on. Can a new residential lot be created from this land conveyance? No. It is a requirement for new residential lots that are created to have a minimum lot frontage of 30 metres and a minimum lot area of 0.49 acres. The parcel of land to be conveyed to 9 Sugarbush Road will have a lot frontage of approximately 13 metres and a lot area of 0.17 acres. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Committee grant Provisional Consent regarding Application 2006-B-10 subject to the following conditions: 1 . That three copies of a Reference Plan for the subject land indicating the severed parcel be prepared by an Ontario Land Surveyor be submitted to the Secretary- Treasurer; 2. That the applicant's solicitor prepare and submit a copy of the proposed conveyance for the parcel severed, for review by the Municipality; 3. That the severed lands be merged in title with 9 Sugarbush Road, and that the provisions of Subsection 3 or 5 of Section 50 of The Planning Act apply to any subsequent conveyance or transaction involving the subject lands; 4. That the applicants solicitor provide an undertaking that the severed lands and the lands to be enhanced will merge in title; I 5. That all municipal taxes be paid to the Township of Oro-Medonte; and, 6. That the conditions of consent imposed by the Committee be fulfilled within one year from the date of the giving of the notice. AU o~ ~"bm;"d fOle A dy Karais akis HBA, ACST(A) Planner Reviewed by, Glenn White MCIP, RPP Senior Planner THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE PO Box 100, Ora, ON LOL 2XO, (705)-487-2171 NOTICE OF HEARING IN THE MATTER OF Section 53 of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990 c. P. 13 - and- IN THE MATTER of an application for consent, Submission No. 2006-B-I0 AN APPLICATION BY Indian Park Association LOCATION OF PROPERTY Plan M368, Block 103 (Former Township of Oro) PURPOSE OF APPLICATION: The purpose of application 2006-B-I0 is to permit a lot additionlboundary adjustment from Indian Park Association to 9 Sugarbush Road. The land to be severed and conveyed to 9 Sugarbush Road is proposed to have a lot frontage of approximately 13 metres (42.6 feet), a lot depth of approximately 53 metres (173 feet), and a lot area of approximately 686.5 m' (7,390 ft'). The land to be retained by Indian Park Association, Plan M368, Block 103, would have a lot area of approximately 2.5 hectares (6.27 acres). No new building lots are proposed to be created as a result of the lot addition. THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT HEREBY APPOINTS Thursday the 15th day of June 2006, at the hour of 9:30 a.m. in the Oro-Medonte Township Municipal Building in the Council Chambers, for the hearing of all persons who desire to be heard in support of or in opposition to the application. You are entitled to attend this public hearing in person to express your views about this application or you may be represented by counsel for that purpose. If you are aware of any person interested in or affected by this application who has not received a copy of this notice you are requested to inform that person of this hearing. If you wish to make written comments on this application they may be forwarded to the Secretary of the Committee at the address shown above. FAILURE TO ATTEND HEARING - If you do not attend the hearing it may proceed in your absence and, except as otherwise provided in the Planning Act, you will not be entitled to any further notice in the proceedings. The applicant(s) must attend this hearing or be represented by an authorized agent. NonCE OF DECISION - A copy of the decision of the Committee will be sent to the applicant and to each person who appeared in person or by counsel at the hearing and who has filed with the Secretary a written request for notice of the decision. Dated at the Township ofOro-Medonte this 31" day of May 2006. Andy Karaiskakis, Secretary- Treasurer '; 9 SUGARBUSH RD 131:1 D IPA LANDS- PLAN M368, BLOCK 103 1m LANDS TO BE ADDED TO 9 SUGARBUSH RD 100 0 100 Meters I I I I Township of Oro-Medonte Committee of Adjustment Planning Report for June 15, 2006 Doug & Wayne She/swell 2006-8-11 Concession 14, West Part Lot 18 (Former Township of Ora) 191 Line 13 South THE PROPOSAL The applicants are proposing to create a new residential lot as a surplus to a farming operation. The lot to be severed is proposed to have a lot frontage along Line 13 of approximately 121.9 metres (400 feet), a depth of approximately 164 metres (540 feet) and having a lot area of approximately 2 hectares (4.96 acres) and currently contains a dwelling and a detached garage. The land to be retained is proposed to have a lot area of approximately 38.4 hectares (95 acres) and is currently being used for agricultural production. MUNICIPAL POLICY, ZONING AND PREVIOUS APPROVALS Official Plan Designation - Agricultural, Environmental Protection Two Overlay Zoning By-law 97 -95 -Agricultural/Rural (A1RU) Zone Previous Applications - none AGENCY COMMENTS (space is provided for the Committee to make notes) Simcoe County - Public Works Department - Building Department- Engineering Department- Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food - PLANNING FRAMEWORK ANALYSIS The applicants are proposing a farm consolidation in lands designated Agricultural in the Township Official Plan. This application proposes to create a residential lot in an agricultural area, as such, comments have been requested from the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food (OMAF). At the time of writing this report, OMAF comments have not yet been received by the Township. RECOMMENDATIONS It is recommended that the Committee defer Severance 2006-B-11 to allow time for the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food to comment on this application. All of which is respectfully submitted, // ..-, ~v: Adrian Cammaert, SA, CPT Planning Technician Reviewed by, I Glenn White, RPP, MCIP Senior Planner 2 ~/ 240115/16 SIDEROAD E 94 LINE 14S LINE 1 S 5071HWY11 LINE 14 S LINE S 232 LINE 145 11 LINE 135 278 !NE S LI 313 LINE 14$ 191 LINE 135 188 LINE 135 ~ ~ w z :J ~ N ~ CON 14 PT LOT 19 N OF C CON 13 PT LOT 19 225 LINE 13$ CON 1 4 lNE 4 S 5 lNE 4 S CON 14 E PT LOT 19 & 20 55 LINE 14 5 INE 4 S 567 LINE 14 S 190 95 o 190 Meters 6J oRo -mfDDlV'Tc ~ , , l,.t n:>E:. Iii ",o'tb-~1Jf9 ~if'1d I~- \.., &i - :r '2 c:<"";> I - cc d ,~ Z;; "3 -+- ~ - >: dO) <l 0' d ,- ("(; - (.. ~ 'i::l.. or ,Q'bbl . -- - -. r '.j'>--'- ""i".~" "'-'-""'."~-~--"'l f'{ 't:>o I ~ ~ -- ia d .... ~ ..... ~ "f-- C ~ 0 ~ (;) 0 .,:. '1 ~ I- ~ c... 8 0- J,. t'> ~ ~ 0'" ~ - -- ,5 :) -+- ~ .3;- .- k ~ :i )- e-- u C:l 'co ~'1001~ ~ - ,- ...)' -.? :.It c:. ~ (- C> ...s- '- c:.<l<--SC - ;,.--,.-,. n :JC1Jh ::I1.6lAoClJW o~ /""""-1-/""-') IJb'o Township of Oro-Medonte Committee of Adjustment Planning Report for June 15, 2006 Horseshoe Valley Lands Limited 2006-8-12 Concession 4, Part Lots 3 & 4, Parts 6,7,8, 10, 11, 18, 19, and 22 all on Plan 51R-30671 (Former Tpwnship of Oro) THE PROPOSAL The purpose of application 2006-B-12 is to permit a technical severance to recreate the subject lands which merged on title with the adjacent lands, also owned by Horseshoe Valley Lands Limited. The lands proposed to be recreated include Parts 6, 7, 8,10,11,18,19 and 22 of Reference Plan 51R-30671. The subject lands merged on title with the adjacent lands to the east on February 20, 2006 when Horseshoe Valley Lands Limited acquired title to the lands. MUNICIPAL POLICY, ZONING AND PREVIOUS APPROVALS Official Plan Designation - Horseshoe Valley Low Density Residential Zoning By-law 97-95 - Residential One R1*140 Zone and Residential One R1*140 (H) Zone AGENCY COMMENTS (space is provided for the Committee to make notes) Simcoe County- Public Works Department- Building Department- The Township Building Dept has reviewed this application and note that the proposal appears to meet the minimum standards Engineering Department- No concerns PLANNING DEPARTMENT BACKGROUND Horseshoe Valley Lands Limited (HVLL) originally owned the subject lands and the adjacent lands (Parts 12,13,14,15,16 and 17 of Plan 51R-30671) as one large parcel. The subject lands were transferred to Laurel View Homes (HV) Inc. Laurel View decided not to proceed with the other phases of its residential development and transferred the subject lands back to Horseshoe Valley Lands Ltd. Since Horseshoe Valley Lands Ltd. also owns adjacent lands (Parts 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, and 17 of Plan 51R-30671) there was a technical merger with the subject lands. If Laurel View had transferred the subject lands to any other entity other than Horseshoe Valley Lands Ltd this technical issue would not have arisen. OFFICIAL PLAN Section E2.5.4 Horseshoe Valley Low Density Residential designation permits single detached dwellings, home occupations, private recreational uses such as golf courses and accessory uses. . OPA #17 which was a general Arnendment to the Official Plan was adopted by Council in August 2003 and approved by the County of Simcoe on November 10, 2004 and subsequently has been appealed. OPA #17 proposes the following new section for the Committee's reference: "H2.2.3 Technical Severances" The creation of new lots to correct a situation where two or more lots have merged on title may be permitted, provided the Committee of Adjustment is satisfied that the lot: a) was once a separate lot in accordance with the Planning Act; b) the merging of the lots was unintentional and was not merged as a requirement of a previous planning approval; c) is of the same shape and size as the lot which once existed as a separate conveyable lot; d) can be adequately serviced by on-site sewage and water systems; e) frants on and will be directly accessed by a public road that is maintained year-round by a public authority; f) there is no public interest served by maintaining the praperty as a single conveyable parcel; and, g) conforms with Section H2.2.1 of this Plan. While it is recognized that OPA#17 is not in effect, it does function as a statement of Council policy. This technical severance general conforms with the above noted policies and other policies will be address when the lands are developed by way of a plan of subdivision. This application is recreating a parcel of land which existed before and was not intended to be merged with the adjacent lands. The consent will not change the land use as perrnitted by the Official Plan. ZONING BY-LAW The subject property is currently zoned Residential One R1*140 Zone and Residential One R1*140 (H) Zone. The zoning of the subject reflects the policies of the Official Plan. The subject lands are already zoned and will be developed in the future by way of a plan of subdivision application. This consent application will not affect the zoning presently in place. CONCLUSION The application conforms to the policies of the Official Plan. The consent is for a technical severance to recreate lands which were formally separate. The lands are still intended to be used for residential purposes and the existing zoning will still apply to the lands. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Committee grant Provisional Consent regarding Application 2006-B-12 subject to the following conditions: 1. That three copies of a Reference Plan for the subject land indicating the severed parcel be prepared by an Ontario Land Surveyor be submitted to the Secretary- Treasurer; 2. That the applicant's solicitor prepare and submit a copy of the proposed conveyance for the parcel severed, for review by the Municipality; 3. That all municipal taxes be paid to the Township of Oro-Medonte; and, 4. That the conditions of consent imposed by the Committee be fulfilled within one year from the date of the giving of the notice. All of which is respectfully submitted, , .d~ Glenn White MCIP, RPP Senior Planner -.J1 I .J \1 tj \~-1' tj I~ i IL...IUJ[____~ I , I \ ? \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I' , ' L---./1 1]" , , I ~ i , r- -" LJI ,,' I I I I -"---'!I--"-- , I, I :1 '\ !\ ; \ \ I I I , ~ ---- i I \ I i J I j Part ?f I ti:: i wO I ~[jj (l)rr w>- (l)W rr...J o <i! Part 8 I> Part 1 HORSESHOE VALLEY LANDS L TD I L ~ I N~V' " ! HORSESHOE VALLEY RESORT ~ \ , I I I ! LJ I ~ ~-- ~, '-,;:~~ ~" \ \, \ \ \ \ \ \ L_~_ \ \ D SUBJECT LANDS \\) '. \ \ \ II I 11/ /j,/ F " II ii I i I I , ! [J I Township of Oro-Medonte Committee of Adjustment Planning Report for June 15, 2006 Susan Roubos 2006-B-13 1644 Ridge Road East, Plan 1230, Lot 7 (Oro) THE PROPOSAL The purpose of application 2006-B-13 is to permit a lot additionlboundary adjustment. The land to be severed and conveyed fram 1644 Ridge Road East to the adjacent vacant parcel of land, Lot 6, Plan 1230, is proposed to have a lot width of approximately 30.7 metres (101 feet), a varying lot depth of approximately 49 metres (160 feet) to 63 metres (206 feet), and a lot area of approximately 0.15 hectares (0.37 acres). The land to be retained, 1644 Ridge Road East which currently contains an existing dwelling, would have a lot frontage of appraximately 30.7 rnetres (101 feet) and an area of approximately 0.17 hectares (0.42 acres). No new building lots are proposed to be created as a result of the lot addition. MUNICIPAL POLICY, ZONING AND PREVIOUS APPROVALS Official Plan Designation - Hawkestone Residential Zoning By-law 97-95 - Residential One (R1) Zone Previous Applications - None AGENCY COMMENTS (space is provided for the Committee to make notes) Simcoe County- Public Works Department- Building Department- Engineering Department- No Concerns PLANNING DEPARTMENT BACKGROUND The applicant is proposing a boundary adjustment to convey and add approximately 0.15 hectares (0.37 acres) to the adjacent vacant residential lot located to the west of 1644 Ridge Road East, legally described as Lot 6 Plan 1230. The purpose of the adjustment is to include mature trees to be associated with the vacant lot and to create a larger residential lot. The land to be retained, 1644 Ridge Road East, would have an area of approximately 0.42 acres, which currently contains a dwelling. OFFICIAL PLAN The subject lands are designated Hawkestone Residential in the Oro-Medonte Official Plan. It is the intent of the Official Plan that Hawkestone develop in a manner that is consistent with the developrnent pattern of a traditional small-town in Ontario. The policies applicable to Hawkestone are silent with respect to boundary adjustments. OPA #17 which was a general Amendment to the Official Plan was adopted by Council in August 2003 and approved by the County of Simcoe on November 10, 2004 and subsequently has been appealed. OPA #17 proposes the following new section for the Committee's reference: "Boundary Adjustments A consent may be perrnitted for the purpose of modifying lot boundaries, provided no new building lot is created. In reviewing an application for such a boundary adjustment, the Committee of Adjustment shall be satisfied that the boundary adjustment will not affect the viability of the use of the properties affected as intended by this Plan. In addition, the Committee of Adjustment shall be satisfied that the boundary adjustment will not affect the viability of the agricultural parcels affected." While it is recognized that OPA#17 is not in effect, it does function as a statement of Council policy. ZONING BY-LAW The retained lands, the lands to be enlarged and the parcel of land to be conveyed to Lot 6, Plan 1230 are currently zoned Residential One (R1) in the Township's Zoning By- law 97-95, as amended. It is noted that in order to satisfy the minimum lot area slandard for the R1 Zone, the retained parcel would have to be reconfigured to increase its total lot area fram 0.17 ha (0.42 ac) to 0.2 ha (0.49 ac). With this revision, the application would generally conform with the policies of the Zoning By-law. CONCLUSION The proposed consent application is for a lot addition that does not appear to offend the principles of the Official Plan and the retained lands and the lands to be enhanced would comply with the requirements in the R1 Zone. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Committee grant Provisional Consent regarding Application 2006-B-13 subject to the following conditions: 1. That the retained parcel's total lot area be increased from 0.17 ha (0.42 ac) to 0.2 ha (0.49 ac) in order to satisfy the rninirnum lot area standard for the Residential One (R1) Zone, as stated in the Township Zoning By-law, as amended; 2. That three copies of a Reference Plan for the subject land indicating the severed parcel be prepared by an Ontario Land Surveyor be submitted to the Secretary- Treasurer; 3. That the applicant's solicitor prepare and submit a copy of the praposed conveyance for the parcel severed, for review by the Municipality; 4. That the severed lands be merged in title with Lot 7 Plan 1230 and that the P!o\tisions of Subsection 3 or 5 of Section 50 of The Planning Act apply to any subsequent conveyance or transaction involving the subject lands; 5. That the applicants solicitor provide an undertaking that the severed lands and the lands to be enhanced will merge in title; 6. That all municipal taxes be paid to the Township of Ora-Medonte; and, 7. That the conditions of consent imposed by the Comrnittee be fulfilled within one year from the date of the giving of the notice. roe; A~:"bm;tl~ Andy Karaiskakis HBA, ACST(A) Planner ~ Glenn White MCIP, RPP Senior Planner II I I I I \ \ I \ \ \ I \ ;: \ ~ I \ \ I I \ \ \ \ i I I I \ \ \ \ I I I i \ i I I I ~ I i 1 \ II I I . I \ I \ , I \ , \ \ , Lands to be severed & conveyed to ot 6, Plan 1230 I \ L I i I i I i I I \ \ \~ Lands to be retained 1644 Ridge Road E. I i I I i I J~ .1_______ ---r---~ ~1- I \ I ' I . I . . j----r----\ i--\ \ ! I I. I . I 1 I I I L I . . I I I I'. . . i~_.m~----": I . i i i I :-...,.... I I. I. 'i · I I I i --~CE~ARBROOK L Lot 6, Plan 1bo . I i ' i . f\\ \ ) , ~ VI I' ,. I' II \ I I ,. t I , II . r--' · i \ i I.. \ \ \. i , ; I Z --....--I i I i UJ Ii Ij i i 1< --j :__'1 i--11 II i II I i I ~rq-J ! .-----, ~\ . i i ' I \ I L I I I I I .-J ~.m \ : . Township of Oro-Medonte Committee of Adjustment Planning Report for June 15, 2006 Carol & Jeremy Kurtin 2006-A-15 172 Line 6 South, Cone. 6, Part Lot 21, RP 51R-17288 Part 1 (Oro) THE PROPOSAL The applicants are proposing to construct a 133 m' (1 ,440 ft2) detached storage building to be attached to the existing 53.5 m' (576 tt') detached garage. The resulting floor area for the combined buildings will be 186.5 m' (2,016 ft'). The applicants are therefore requesting relief of the following provision from Zoning By-law 97-95: i. Section 5.1.6 Maximum floor area for detached accessory buildings of 70 m' (753 ft') to 186.5 m' (2,016 ff) for the construction of the detached storage building to be attached to the existing detached garage. The proposed detached building will store 2 boats, trailers and various outdoor equipment. MUNICIPAL POLICY, ZONING AND PREVIOUS APPROVALS Official Plan Designation - Agricultural Zoning By-law 97 -95 - Rural Residential Two (RUR2) Zone Previous Applications - None AGENCY COMMENTS (space is provided for the Committee to make notes) Public Works - Building Department- Engineering Department - No Concerns PLANNING FRAMEWORK Background The subject property has a road frontage of approximately 60 metres (198 feet), a lot depth of approximately 167 metres (550 feet) and a lot area of approximately 1 hectares (2.5 acres). The lands currently have a 1 storey dwelling with an area of approximately 139 m' (1,500 ft'), a 9 m2 (100 It') wood shed and a 53 m' (576 ft ) detached garage. It is the applicants' intent to construct a 133 m'(1,440 ff) detached storage building to be attached to the existing detached garage to be located 6m (20 ft) from the interior side lot line. The applicant requested the above noted relief for the increase in size for the detached garage to accommodate room for storage of two boats, trailers and various outdoor equipment. The Four Tests of the Minor Variance Does the variance conform with the general intent of the Official Plan? The property is designated Agricultural in the Official Plan. Section D2.1 of the Township's Official Plan sets out the following objectives for the Agricultural designation. To maintain and preserve the agricultural resource base of the Township. To protect land suitable for agricultural production from development and land uses unrelated to agriculture; and To preserve and promote the agricultural character of the Township and the maintenance of the open countryside. The principle use of land in the Agricultural designation shall be agriculture. Other permitted uses include single detached dwellings and other accessory uses. The applicant's proposal does not appear to offend these principles given that the variance will accommodate development of a detached accessory building accessory to the permitted residential use and would not appear to have a negative impact on the agricultural character of the area. On this basis the proposal is considered to conform with the intent of the Official Plan. Does the variance conform with the general intent of the Zoning By-law? The subject property is zoned Rural Residential Two (RUR2). It is the applicants' intent to use the proposed building for storage of 2 boats, trailers, outdoor machinery and personal workshop. The intent of the Zoning By-law is to provide regulations which should foster compatibility amongst land uses and structures. With respect to accessory buildings, zoning regulations typically try to ensure that such buildings are clearly accessory and incidental to the primary use of the lot. The primary reason for controlling maximum floor areas on accessory buildings in a residential area is to ensure that structures are consistent with the character of a community and do not evolve into other secondary or subsequent land uses, such as an apartment or industrial uses. With the proposed detached garage, the lot coverage of all detached accessory buildings will be under the required maximum lot coverage of 5%, as the proposed garage will increase the lot coverage to 1.9%. Given these factors, the proposal is deemed to not conform with the general intent of the Zoning By-law. Is the variance appropriate for the desirable development of the lot? The applicant's lot is a relatively large rural residential property and the proposed building appears generally compatible within the agricultural neighbourhood. On this basis the proposal is considered appropriate for the desirable development of the subject lot. Is the variance minor? On the basis that the size of the garage in contrast with the proposed dwelling appears to be reasonable, is well buffered from the front and side lot lines and should not adversely affect the character of the agricultural area, the proposed variance is considered to be minor. CONCLUSIONS The requested variance generally satisfies the 4 tests of a minor variance. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Committee approve Minor Variance application 2006-A-15 subject to the following conditions: L 1. That the size of the proposed detached workshoplgarage be no larger than 133 m' (1,440 ft'); 2. That the appropriate building permit be obtained from the Township's Chief Building Official only after the Committee's decision becomes final and binding, as provided for within the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P. 13; 3. That the setbacks be in conformity with the dimensions as set out in the application and on the sketches submitted with the application and approved by the Committee; and, 4. That all municipal taxes be paid to the Township of Oro-Medonte; ~"Z::?t'd Andy KaraisKa is, HBA, ACST(A) Planner For1..' Reviewed by, 4~ Glenn White, MCIP, RPP Senior Planner o o ;URVEYOR'S REAL PROPERTY REPORT 'AfH I LAN OF 'ART OF LOT 21, :ONCESSION 6 OWNSHIP OF ORO :OUNTY OF SIMCOE iCALE: I inch:: 60 feel \LAN J. WOROBEC a.L,S. 391, BEARING REFERENCE BEARING.:! ME A5TROHOloIIC ANO ME REFEAAEO TO I'AilT OF nil:: ViOT lJMIT OF THE ROAD AU..OWANCE: IlElWEE)l~ I> a 7. AS SHO.....N ONP'L.AN :llR-nZllll. HAVtNG A !'lEMmG Of' N 30' 00' O(r W \::.EGEND __ OE>>0TE3 FOUND MONl.J1,\EHT ,-0- DENOTes f'LAIiTED MOtIUMfHT 5m DENOTES STA-'IOAA.O IRON aN'! l!l O~TES!Roo 8AFI tOU) OEHOTB OAGlI'l1..Nl<>>O'WN M...,. O~.'lOTEs MEASUAEO wr; o<o:;on::s WITNESS PI DENOTES ?LAN ~1Il_17288 19lU DENOTES JJt. BflAD!lURY OL5. :9 C.I)I>YRlQfT BRADBURY 8 WOROOEC SURVE'I'1NG LTO.,1:.l9\ IURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE liEllEIH CERTlFY ntAT THE FEILD SURVEY RU'AESOITEO )/1 TtlIS PLAN WAS COi.\F'LETEO O!f mE Z711> CAY OF \U(;U5TI~Sl ---.mLUllL- oTE ~. AL>>I~oaEC ONJ,(lj;ift..ANOS~OR. ;RADBURY 8 WOROBEC SURVEYING LTD ONTARIO LAND SURVEYORS 129 DUNLPP STREET EAST, Tel. (105) 721-0622 8ARRIE, ONTARIO L4M lAG Fax. 170S} 722-3904 >0 PROJECT 91-122 ~on:~nll$IlEl'O'lT CAn Elf.: lif'OATttlIl1 ThI$ OF1'lcr. HOW(VOl: ff(J 100m ,~\" CIOM1F1W PRINTS o. n..$ OIllClNAL ilUOilT WILt. OE SW<<:'. '\tSSOr,'(uT TO THI:: D"T'I: 01" COrr.FICATIt'>'l. --_.4__ ___,1__.________ PART 2 THIS PLAN MUST BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH SURVEY REPORT !JATED SEPT. 3, 1991 , ,,\ ,," ;;~". c,' ,S.:? .', ""',0:'- ..',~. , ' -(,.. ~1li:iX ~* ... ,j. ~ .;, . :J. g '1 .; S . 1 ~ ~ -v";' o 7,;, ? ., o j ;> 4 r-.,,' ~ 44::"i % iI- t. I J$';W ~.t:~_~"J .,.. , y,ij - ~ so' OC' ocr e .5.50.00" 11'1 & Ma"",J '-i,;f)t ;),-1-"'1- *'l-'l*it-~4..jX#. /~..--- 'f ,,+ Y #- "'I "" ' .,. ;;t J r;). v-.. .j [J I fJ~c~,.."" !;,.:~,'."~1: (~)!=- ,,; :"\l4~ l' 'Pa.rf:! ?(cpxd ~*~ :,..jMfi 5/R:'/728,8 t\J;ldi~J U"f"")"t. ~ c:: -;., ,. . '-, C';l~:e~;,:;:c,;: ct ,;t J ;i ',p,"f,.') '~~ .f ,/ , ," " ,;;' .-j--' I __h"~_~ '::/ ;., ..;} -' ') ,...) i' j ~v" '-' rHIS REPORT WAS PREPARED fOR JERRY GABOVIC \ R. ROLSTorJ AND THE UNDERSIGNED ACCEPTS NO REsPONSlelllTY FOR THE USE BY OTHER PARTIES. .L 6 Insl. No. 0105311I -,; ;.': ,W ->I, II G?'oo'o'r E if' .;/ '.50.00' C?l&Maa.) /6..39"';:;).,18" o S:_P~'~ 1".,,,,- c:: Q) Q)f'..- . "8 S:: '" (!J/J) -- '--; 'I Q)C() (:::> I~ .. ~ ca of ~ \D . ~ Q) .r -:: ~ '-' '" o . - :i i c:: c:: ~ = $ 0 Cl II u' ~-~ "" 3: S:: -- Cl '" a): go - '" ..... j{ ~ 0 - Q) " ~ 0 q '-' ~ ,;; ? ~ g c:: <>:: 11- , \) Cl ou :;,:+1 Cl Q:: o S1 pi.; ,_ T<G--~' lt~~r S.E.C"",,,, ~or2' C""'~IUNM u-..~l.D't:>r!'U LOT 22 Concession 6 ~..---l E " ~ " 4 1 Chestnut Equestrian Centre 118 Line 6 South, R.R.#1 Oro Station, ON May 28, 2006 Committee of Adjustments Township of Oro-Medonte To Whom It May Concern: SUBJECT: LETTER OF SUPPORT FOR JEREMY AND CAROL KURTIN This letter is written by Muriel and Brad Chestnut, of Lot 21 East Oro-Medonte Township, to express our support for the placing of a storage building on the property of Carol and Jeremy Kurtin, on Line 6 South of Oro-Medonte Township. We fully feel that this will be a positive addition to our neighborhood, and will allow for the proper storage of the Kurtin's belongings. Thank you for your consideration, and we wish the Kurtin's all the best in their efforts to beautify and upgrade their property. Sincerely, /?J4~ ~.. Bradley K. Chestnut ~JCk;:J Muriel Chestnut May 29/06 To The Township Of Oro Medonte I do not ol:lject to my neighbour; Jeremy Kurtin, 172 6th Line S, erecting a targe storage shed. , Township of Oro-Medonte Committee of Adjustment Planning Report for June 15, 2006 Jeff Johnston 2006-A-16 2666 Line 11 North, Cone. 11, East Part Lot 4, (Oro) THE PROPOSAL The applicant is proposing to construct a detached garage with an area of 130.8 m' (1,408 It') which is to replace the existing detached garage. The applicant is requesting the following relief from Zoning By-law 97-95: 1. Section 5.1.4 Maximum HeiQht for the detached garage from the required 4.5 metres (14.7 feet) to a proposed 6.7 metres (22 feet). MUNICIPAL POLICY, ZONING AND PREVIOUS APPROVALS Official Plan Designation - Agricultural, Environmental Protection Two Overlay Zoning By-law 97-95 - AgriculturallRural (NRU) Zone Previous Applications - None AGENCY COMMENTS (space is provided for the Committee to make notes) Public Works Department- Building Department - Engineering Department - No Concerns PLANNING FRAMEWORK Background The subject property has a lot frontage of approximately 615 metres (2017.7 feet) and a lot area of approximately 40.47 hectares (100 acres) and is presently occupied by a single detached dwelling and two accessory buildings (one barn and one detached garage). The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing detached garage and replace it with a new, enlarged detached garage. The minor variance is required because the proposed detached garage is 6.7 metres (22 feet) in height, thereby exceeding the 4.5 metres (14.7 feet) height limit. The Four Tests of the Minor Variance Does the variance conform with the general intent of the Official Plan? The property is designated Agricultural in the Official Plan. Section 02.1 of the Township's Official Plan sets out the following objectives for the Agricultural designation. To maintain and preserve the agricultural resource base of the Township. To protect land suitable for agricultural production from development and land uses unrelated to agriculture: and To preserve and promote the agricultural character of the Township and the maintenance of the open countryside. The principle use of land in the Agricultural designation shall be agriculture. Other permitted uses include single detached dwellings and other accessory uses. The applicant's proposal does not appear to offend these principles given that the variance will accommodate development of a detached accessory building accessory to the permitted residential use and would not appear to have a negative impact on the agricultural character of the area. On this basis the proposal is considered to conform with the intent of the Official Plan. Does the variance conform with the general intent of the Zoning By-law? The subject property is zoned Agricultural/Rural (AlRU). The Zoning By-law does not place a height restriction on agricultural buildings and barns located in areas zoned AlRU. However, the AlRU Zone restricts all non-agricultura/ accessory buildings to a maximum height of 4.5 metres (14.7 feet). Staffs opinion is that the proposed detached garage is non-agricultural in nature, and therefore, the aforementioned height restriction must be satisfied. It should be noted that as per Section 5.1.1 of the Zoning By-law, human habitation in an accessory building is not permitted. The applicants are aware of this restriction, and therefore, this application proposes no human habitation in the detached garage. The proposed detached garage should not adversely impact the agricultural character of the surrounding area as the garage will be located behind the existing single family dwelling and set- back approximately 400 metres (1312 feet) from the front and side lot lines. Therefore the proposal is considered to conform with the general intent of the By-law Is the variance appropriate for the desirable development of the lot? The nature of development proposed appears modest and will not lead to the over development of the lot. The proposed variance would provide for a form of development that is suitable and consistent with the surrounding area by permitting a detached accessory building associated with a residential use. On this basis, the proposed accessory building would appear to be consistent with a residential use and would be considered appropriate for the desirable development of the lot. Is the variance minor? On the basis that the proposal would not adversely affect the character of the surrounding agricultural area, the proposed variance is considered to be minor in nature. CONCLUSIONS The proposed variance generally satisfies the 4 tests of a minor variance as reviewed above. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Committee approve Minor Variance Application 2006-A-16 subject to the following conditions: 1. That the height of the detached garage not exceed 6.7 metres (22 feet): 2 2. That an Ontario Land Surveyor provide verification to the Township of compliance with the Committee's decision by verifying in writing that the garage be no higher than 6.7 metres (22 feet); and 3. That the appropriate building permit be obtained from the Township's Chief Building Official only after the Committee's decision becomes final and binding, as provided for within the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P. 13. All of which is respectfully submitted, ---j /~> /"~/ /~;/ - "~>//""/:: '~~ z ,. / l. /" - Adrian Cammaert, BA, CPT Planning Technician Reviewed by, Glenn White, RPP, MCIP Senior Planner , -, c:::'/Er-r ::Ju/~..s "c::J /l c?/ ..c/ - ('o"J // ~I ~ ~ "\~ ..J., ,II Y "- -, r-zopO::,6D ~ , I i '-J6lV , C;;; _-,"/:'...76g;= I r-:::: l/) i -' "7 i '-' /y B \~ .{<~ril \ \l'\ Yda I"' I, tll-. I ; 2- ~ ~ "\~ ~ --<-/,;0/,<[' - // . . l2' " ASPHALT SHINGLES :..~- ,~~ ''''" VINYL SIDING I ,0- ~ I] ~ ~ !~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~[I ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ! I I I I 1 ~~~~E--+I I I I I aElOWGAAOE I I I I I ONl:lIGFOOT 10;--1, =- -=- -=- _- -=- -=- _- -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- _- -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- _- _=_ -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- _- -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- ~l _ ~ I _ J FRONT ELEVATION SCALE 1/4"::1'0" , /RIDGEVENT / 12 ~" . VINYL SIDING 2'0" cn:J r::u::n:::JD! DDDD ClClClCl V~L~ i!' ~ ~: : :,~::::;:+l ~I ,: , , , b ~ , STEP ,,1'6" l~ FCAS" ==I "? 10 101 APPROX GRADI . I I I I ~ -=-- -=- -=- -=- -=-- -=- -=- -=- -=- _-:.--=- ~~ -=- -=- _~ ~- -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- -=-'-=- -=- -=- --=:-'-=- -=-J LEFT ELEVATION SCALE 114"=1'0" s a v Steen 6uildi"U Scrvi HCollX>rno Slrcct Ea.\ S"ite2Q1 Onili.,OntmiQ r' UV1T4 BCIN # ~ Project Title b , b N ~ '" to , ~ ~ Address Drawing Title' PROPOSED ( FOR PAULINE AND JEFF JO Design by: J.S. S Dfawnby: PW f' Sprvdby: J.S. ",--" --- Checked by: J.S Revisions ~~--- r>- ! II I I I 1 Oli\lli;.:; I z......... . I !!!O3:l3 I G'l~-z 12;lG'l:'9. '" I. 9.~"lc (.) I N: ili ~! 1 p:ll I ~ I I ~ I I ~ I I i, I ~ I II ~~1 m I I ::: 11 ", ' 111 I ~I ~ I ..1- - '1 I I I, \ I! I I , I I I i' : I I, ~~J---- . . '" q oj ~~ ,~ \ "'< 5z ~? \ \ iVALlEY fCAS" . ~Z"HIGH RAlllNG\ iDI 0' il \1 1'8" STEP FLASH CO'UNTER fCAS" 2'0" VINYL SIDING 01 01 101 01 10 APPROX GRADE . I I I I I r I_~ I 1 1 lZ"SQNOTUBE 1-r--_SETMIN~8. I I BELOW GRADE r'~ ON BIGFOOT ! - ~~ ~--~-_.~-_.~ ~ ~ ~.~"~.-- .- .- .- - - - ------------------------- -------- ,-- -'~ -.- - - --. ~- - - "- - - - - -"'" -" - ,- ,,,- -- _LOt REAR ELEVATION SCALE 1/4"=1'0" . Township of Oro-Medonte Committee of Adjustment Planning Report for June 15, 2006 Marion Tilstra 2006-A-13 (Rev) 19 Seneca Lane, Plan M30, Lot 15, RP 51R-33067, Part 19 (Oro) THE PROPOSAL The applicant is proposing to construct an addition to the existing dwelling, an attached garage and erect a detached storage shedlworkshop behind the existing dwelling, as shown on the attached sketch. The applicant is requesting relief of the following provisions from Zoning By-law 97-95: i. Setback from the minimum required side vard of required 4.5 metres (14.7 feet) to a proposed 2.7 metres (9 feet) ii. Section 5.32 Setback from Slopes of required 23 metres (75 feet) to a proposed 2.4 metres (8 feet) MUNICIPAL POLICY, ZONING AND PREVIOUS APPROVALS Official Plan Designation - Sugarbush Special policy Area - Residential Zoning By-law 97-95 - Residential One Exception 113 (R1*113) AGENCY COMMENTS (space is provided for the Committee to make notes) Municipal Works/Roads - Building Department - Engineering Department - Concerns regarding locating the proposed development within close proximity to a slope over 33%. Slope stability study required. PLANNING FRAMEWORK Background On May 11, 2006, minor variance application 2006-A-13 was deferred to allow time for comments to be received from the Township Engineer and identify the proposed new location of the storage shed/workshop. Since that time, it has been determined by the Township Engineer that a slope stability study is required to determine the feasibility of locating the proposed development within close proximity to a slope over 33%. At the time of writing this report, the slope stability study has not been received by the township and the location for the detached storage shedlworkshop has not been clarified. RECOMMENDATIONS It is recommended that Committee defer Minor Variance Application 2006-A-13 (Rev) to allow the applicant time to provide the Township with the required slope stability study and determine the location of the detached storage shed/workshop. All of which is respectfully submitted, ,/~/ /7 . /~/;:) //// ~- { Adrian Cammaert, BA, CPT Planning Technician Reviewed by, U Glenn White, RPP, MCIP Senior Planner . fit -~- ---------------- I'1G'EmUllt _166.98' O:IU1N6 \r \ \\ '\ , N O<ISTING't \ \ ct ~J- \ \ \ \ \ \ o \ % ~ , \ MI\R1ON TlLS.IlA !9 SENECA LANE RD 1.04 COlDIJA1EI1 PLAN NO. M~3{I LOI 15 SCALE,j/3e..w-o' \ \ l-~ ll~ SO*:CA LAN{ S\!GI\I1 WSH I 32.67t.!::...----1 ,--. IUl$''''JtP: I ~ '''''''---1,1 "'''~ 1 5M3' tlUSTING lDU.....-] 1..""..Dtt<1 [-----------' , ' , ' , ' , ' , ' , ' , ' , ' , ' , ' , ' , ' , ' , ' , ' , ' , : L___________J ,oPPROJI....'[\.-DCJ\Tll)<lrT t1<l$llN:;WTlt I I I I , ~I i, I ~~ I ::'~I I ~ g ---- ' _~ I T - I I --..:-----1 L01SlzE33Ze.,+I-SQUARErEE:; PROPOSED ....OIlK$HOF' 336 SQUARE r[(l PROPOSCtl AllDITUJN 10<\ SQUAIlEFtET PlloPDSEDGARAGt381SOUAREri:ET EX1SlING HOUSE 963 SQUARE rEEl PROPOSED LOl COV(RAGI: or llU1LDtNGS jN RELATION TO LOI SIZE 5.<\7. o . i " < , -L... ~ ~ riUS111lG N I . . . . OR . MOllON# (\:)\l 0') 11 MAY 1 7 2006 MEETING: COUNCIL C.OFWD In Attendance: Chairperson Lynda Aiken, Mernber Garry Potter, Mernber Allan Johnson, Mernber Dave Edwards Mernber Michelle Lynch, Secretary-Treasurer Andy Karaiskakis and Planning Technician Adrian Camrnaert . f'1 I \ jc - Committee of Adiustment Minutes Thursdav Mav 11, 2006, 9:30 a.m. 1. Gommunications and Correspondence Correspondence to be addressed at the tirne of the specific hearing. 2. Disclosure of Pecuniary Interest None declared 3. HearinQs: 9:30 Lorie Emmons Plan 629, Lot 12 (Oro) 23 Nelson Street 2006-A-08 In Attendance: Rod Young, architect, Andrew Jenrie, solicitor representing applicant, Lorie Emmons, owner Secretary-Treasurer read letter from Tim Salkeld, Resource Planner, Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority, dated May 4, 2006 verbatim to the Committee members and those present in the audience. Motion No. CA060511-1 BE IT RESOLVED that: Moved by Michelle Lynch, seconded by Dave Edwards "That the Cornmittee hereby Apprave Minor Variance Application 2006-A-08 to recognize an existing built deck subject to the following conditions: 1. Any stairs accessing the proposed deck are perrnitted to encroach no rnore than 1 metre (3.2 feet) into the setback area of Bass Lake; 2. That the setbacks be in conforrnity with the dirnensions as set out in the application and on the sketches subrnitted with the application; and; 3. That an Ontario Land Surveyor provide cornpliance with condition #2. .....Carried." Committee of AdjustmentwMay 11, 2006 Page 1 \')c -;;2 9:40 Steven Campbell Plan 1464, Lot 71 (Oro) 16 Mazepa Place 2006-A.09 In Attendance: Steven & Joanne Campbell, owners Motion No. CA060511-2 BE IT RESOLVED that: Moved by Garry Potter. seconded by Michelle Lynch "That the Comrnittee hereby Approve Minor Variance Application 2006-A-09 subject to the following conditions: 1. That the size and setbacks of the praposed garage be in conforrnity with the sketches subrnitted with the application and appraved by the Corn m ittee; 2. That the applicants apply for and obtain appraval for the cornbined application for Site Plan Control/Rernoval of the Holding Provision; 3. That the appropriate building permit be obtained frorn the Township's Chief Building Official only after the Cornrnittee's decision becornes final and binding, as provided for within the Planning Act R.S.O, 1990, c.P, 13; 4. That the proposed garage be no larger than 69.68 m2 (750 ft2); 5. That the applicants contact the Township Building Departrnent to satisfy the cornrnents rnade for the proposal; and 6. That all other outbuildings be rernoved upon completion of the garage. .. ...Carried." Committee of Adjustment.May 11, 2006 Page 2 \')c -') 9:50 Andre Hubel Plan M112, Lot 5 (Medonte) 57 Amantacha Court 2006-A-11 In Attendance: Andre Hubel, owner Secretary-Treasurer read letter from Tim Salkeld, Resource Planner, Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority, dated May 2, 2006 verbatim to the Committee members and those present in the audience. Motion No. CA060511-3 BE IT RESOLVED that: Moved by Allan Johnson, seconded by Dave Edwards "That the CornrniUee hereby Approve Minor Variance Application 2006-A-11 subject to the following conditions: 1. That the size and setbacks of the praposed addition be in conforrnity with the sketches subrnitted with the application and approved by the Committee; 2. That the applicant obtain a perrnit (or approval) frarn the Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority under the Conservation Authorities Act; 3. That the applicant contact the Township Building Departrnent to satisfy cornrnents rnade regarding the praposal; 4. That the proposed addition be no larger than 20 m2 (216 fe) as shown on the sketches subrniUed with the application dated February 20, 2006; and, 5. That the appropriate building perrnit be obtained frarn the Township's Chief Building Official only after the CornrniUee's decision becornes final and binding, as provided for within the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P. 13. .. ...Carried." Committee of Adjuslment~May 11, 2006 Page 3 \'Z".. L.\ ~, y,-. -, 1 10:00 Dino & Carla Astri 2006-A-12 Cone. 5, South Part Lot 16, RP 51R-8920, Part 1 (Medonte) 646 Moonstone Road West In Attendance: Dino & Carla Astri, owners Secretary-Treasurer read letter from Tim Salkeld, Resource Planner, Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority, dated May 4, 2006 verbatim to the COl'Jlmittee members and those present in the audience. Motion No. CA060511-4 BE IT RESOLVED that: Moved by Garry Potter, seconded by Dave Edwards "That the Cornrnittee hereby Approve Minor Variance Application 2006-A-12 for the construction of a swirnrning pool, deck, a frame purnp shed and a frarne storage shed which are located within the Iirnits of the Environrnental Protection (EP) Zone and the 30 rnetre setback area frorn the EP Zone and be subject to the following conditions: 1. That the size and setbacks of the praposed swirnrning pool be in conforrnity with the sketches subrnitted with the application and approved by the Cornrnittee; 2. That the applicant obtain a perrnit (or approval) from the Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority under the Conservation Authorities Act; and, 3, That the apprapriate building perrnit be obtained frarn the Township's Chief Building Official only after the Comrnittee's decision becomes final and binding, as provided for within the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c,P. 13, ..".Carried." Committee of Adjustment-May 11 , 2006 Page 4 . j " \', h \)C~} 10:10 Marion Tilstra Plan M30, Lot 15, RP 51R-33067, Part 19 (Oro) 19 Seneca Lane 2006-A-13 In Attendance: Marion Tilstra Motion No. CA060511.5 BE IT RESOLVED that: Moved by Dave Edwards, seconded by Allan Johnson "That the Cornrnittee hereby defer Minor Variance Application 2006-A-13 until cornments have been received frorn the Township Engineer and the proposed new location of the storage shed has been identified. .....Carried." Committee of Adjustment-May 11, 2006 Page 5 ~, .. , \ 1'"";. J \ ")C - \J:J 10:20 Harold & Sue Regan 2005-A-27(Revised) Plan 626, Lot 37, Part Lot 105 (Oro) 8 Simcoeside Ave. In Attendance: John Raimondi, project manager representing owners Motion No. CA060511-6 BE IT RESOLVED that: , Moved by Garry Potter, seconded by Michelle Lynch "That the CornrniUee hereby approve Minor Variance Application No. 2005-A-27 as revised subject to the following conditions: 1. That the apprapriate building perrnit be obtained frorn the Township's Chief Building Official only after the CornrniUee's decision becornes final and binding, as pravided for within the Planning Act R.S,O. 1990, c.P. 13; 2. That the applicants contact the Township Building Departrnent to satisfy the comrnents rnade for the proposal; 3. That prior to issuance of a building permit, an Ontario Land Surveyor pravide verification to the Township of cornpliance with the Cornrnittee's decision by 1) pinning the footing and 2) verifying in writing prior to pouring of the foundation that the proposed new dwelling: i) be no closer than 6.4 metres (21 feet) frarn the front lot line; ii) the porch aUached to the dwelling be no closer than 4.5 rnetres (15 feet) frarn the front lot line; and, iii) does not encraach further into the rear yard- will maintain the existing setback; and, 4. That the setbacks be in conforrnity with the dimensions as set out in the application and on the sketches subrniUed with the application and appraved by the CornmiUee, as subrniUed. .. ...Carried." Committee of Adjustment-May 11, 2006 Page 6 - I . """\ , I 10:30 Robert & Kelly Talaska Cone. 11, East Part Lot 22 (Oro) 372 Line 11 North 2006-A-14 In Attendance: Robert Talaska, owner Motion No. CA060511-7 BE IT RESOLVED that: Moved by Michelle Lynch, seconded by Allan Johnson "That the Cornrnittee hereby approve Minor Variance Application 2006-A-14 by amending condition 2c) by changing 27.3 rnetres (89.6 feet) to 23.9 rnetres (78.5 feet) and be subject to the following conditions: 1. That the size and setbacks of the proposed addition be in conforrnity with the sketches submitted with the application and approved by the Cornrnittee; 2. That an Ontario Land Surveyor provide verification to the Township of cornpliance with the Cornrnittee's decision by 1) pinning the footing and 2) verifying in writing prior to pouring of the foundation so that: a, the addition be no larger than 77.7 m2 (836 ft); b. the addition be located no closer than 6.4 rnetres (21 feet) frorn the front property line; and c, the addition (deck) be located no closer than 23.9 rnetres (78.5 feet) from the Environmental Protection (EP) boundary. 3. That the apprapriate perrnit be obtained from the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority, if required; 4. That the applicant contact the Township Building Department to satisfy the cornments made for the praposal; and 5. That the appropriate building perrnit be obtained frarn the Township's Chief Building Official only after the Comrnittee's decision becornes final and binding, as provided for within the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c,P. 13, .....Carried." 5. Other Business i. Adoption of rninutes for the April 13, 2006 Meeting Committee of Adjustment~May 11, 2006 Page 7 . I, .. Motion No. CA060511-8 \'7 ;C) l.~r-)( J- \J Moved by Allan Johnson, Seconded by Michelle Lynch "That the rninutes for the April 13th 2006 Meeting be adopted as printed and circulated ...Carried'" iL Adoption of rninutes for the April 18, 2006 Special Meeting Motion No. CA060511-9 Moved by Garry Potter, Seconded by Allan Johnson "That the rninutes for the April 18th 2006 Special Meeting be adopted as printed and circulated ...Carried." 6. Adiournment Motion No. CA060511-10 Moved by Michelle Lynch, Seconded by Dave Edwards "We do now adjourn at 11 :50 a.m." ... Carried." (NOTE: A digital copy of this meeting is available for review.) Chairperson, Lynda Aiken Secretary-Treasurer, Andy Karaiskakis, ACST(A) Committee of Adjustment~May 11, 2006 Page 8