02 01 2006 Council Agenda
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
COUNCil MEETING AGENDA
COUNCil CHAMBERS
DATE: WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 1, 2006
TIME: 7:00 P.M.
.....................................................................................................................
1. OPENING OF MEETING BY THE MAYOR
2. PRA YERlCONTEMPlA TION/REFlECTION
3. NOTICE OF ADDITIONS
4. ADOPTION OF AGENDA
5. "DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST AND THE GENERAL NATURE
THEREOF - IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ACT"
6. MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETINGS:
a) Minutes of Council Meeting of January 18, 2006.
7. RECOGNITION OF ACHIEVEMENTS:
a) Andy Karaiskakis, Designation of Associate Accredited Committee Secretary-Treasurer
from the Ontario Association of Committees of Adjustment and Consent Authorities.
b) Dan Tinny, Certification Program, Workplace Safety & Insurance Board.
8. PUBLIC MEETINGS:
None.
9. DEPUTATIONS:
None.
10. CONSENT AGENDA CORRESPONDENCE:
a) Orillia Public Library Board, minutes of November 23,2005 meeting.
Staff Recommendation: Receipt.
b) Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority, minutes of December 9,2005 meeting.
Staff Recommendation: Receipt.
c) Tom Coon, CEO, YMCA of Simcoe/Muskoka, correspondence dated November 10,
2005 re: Lake Country Community Action Plan Executive Summary.
Staff Recommendation: Receipt.
d) Oro-Medonte History Association, Proclamation Request, "Black History Day", February
25, 2006.
Staff Recommendation: Receipt, Proclaim and Post to Township's Website. .
e) Caroline Di Cocco, MPP, Sarnia-Lambton, correspondence dated January 19, 2006 re:
Private Members Bill 123, Transparency in Public Matters Act, 2005.
Staff Recommendation: Receipt.
f) Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority, minutes of November 25, 2005 meeting.
Staff Recommendation: Receipt.
g) Laura Lee, Manager of Council Services/Clerk, City of Orillia, correspondence dated
January 19, 2006 re: Treatment of Septage Waste.
Staff Recommendation: Receipt.
h) Steve Astin, correspondence received January 24, 2006 re: Proposed Amendment to
Zoning By-Law and Proposed Plan of Subdivision, 2005-ZBA-22 and 2005-SUB-01,
TRY Recycling Inc.
Staff Recommendation: Receipt.
i) Pamela Colquhoun, Physician Recruitment Leader, Community Task Force for
Physician Recruitment, correspondence dated January 2, 2006 re: Financial Support
Request.
Staff Recommendation: Receipt and Refer to 2006 Budget Deliberations.
j) Paul Leslie, Operations Manager, Southwestern Region, Fire Protection Services,
Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services, correspondence dated
January 16, 2006 re: Provision of Fire Protection Services.
Staff Recommendation: Receipt.
11. MOTIONS FOR WHICH NOTICE HAS BEEN GIVEN:
None.
12. REPORTS OF MUNICIPAL OFFICERS:
a) Report No. EES 2006-07, Keith Mathieson, Director of Engineering and Environmental
Services, re: Proposed Solid Waste Collection Schedule for Oro-Medonte.
b) Report No. EES 2006-02, Keith Mathieson, Director of Engineering and Environmental
Services, re: Maplehill Estates (Phase II), Registered Plan 51 M-633 - Certificate of
Maintenance and Final Acceptance (Underground Works) and Certificate of Substantial
Completion and Acceptance (Aboveground Works).
c) Report No. EES 2006-03, Keith Mathieson, Director of Engineering and Environmental
Services, re: Woodland Estates, Plan 51 M-726 - Certificate of Maintenance and Final
Acceptance (Underground Works) and Certificate of Substantial Completion and
Acceptance (Aboveground Works
d) Report No. EES 2006-04, Keith Mathieson, Director of Engineering and Environmental
Services, re: Huronia Homes Subdivision (Phase II), Registered Plan 51 M-807-
Certificate of Substantial Completion and Acceptance (Underground Works
e) Report No. EES 2006-05, Keith Mathieson, Director of Engineering and Environmental
Services, re: Huronia Homes Subdivision (Phase I), Registered Plan 51 M-676-
Certificate of Maintenance and Final Acceptance (Underground Works) and Certificate
of Substantial Completion and Acceptance (Aboveground Works)
f) Report No. EES 2006-06, Keith Mathieson, Director of Engineering and Environmental
Services, re: Maplehill Estates (Phase IB), Registered Plan 51 M-633 - Certificate of
Maintenance and Final Acceptance (Aboveground Works).
13. REPORTS OF COMMITTEES:
a) Committee of the Whole minutes, meeting held on January 25, 2006.
14. COMMUNICATIONS:
None.
15. IN-CAMERA:
None.
16. BY-LAWS:
a) By-Law No. 2006-008 Being a By-law to re-zone certain lands within Part of Lot 15,
Concession 8, Blocks 65-66, Registered Plan 51 M-679
(Medonte), Township of Oro-Medonte from the Residential One
"R1(H)" Zone to the Residential One Exception "R1(H)*165" Zone
(Bachly).
b) By-Law No. 2006-010 Being a By-Law to Amend By-law No. 2004-028 To Authorize a
Decrease in the Speed Limit on Certain Roads Within the
Township of Oro-Medonte.
17. CONFIRMATION BY-LAW NO. 2006-009.
18. QUESTIONS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
19. ADJOURNMENT
ADDENDUM
r
r
1\
\;
COUNCIL MEETING
Wednesday, February 1, 2006
10. CONSENT AGENDA CORRESPONDENCE:
k) Proposed Amendment to Zoning By-Law and Proposed Plan of Subdivision, 2005-
ZBA-22 and 2005-SUB-01, TRY Recycling Inc.
(1) Nancy Stoddart, correspondence received January 27,2006.
(2) Gary Calvert, Commissioner, Development Services, City of Barrie,
correspondence dated January 27,2006.
(3) Dennis Trinaistich, Barrister & Solicitor, correspondence dated January 27,
2006.
(4) Michael Drumm, Airport Manager, Lake Simcoe Regional Airport,
correspondence dated January 25, 2006.
(5) Doug & Sharon McBride, correspondence received January 27,2006.
(6) Carr and Martine Pepler, correspondence dated January 27, 2006 [complete
package available in Clerk's office].
Staff Recommendation: Receipt.
12. REPORTS OF MUNICIPAL OFFICERS:
g) Jennifer Zieleniewski, CAO, re: Draft Resolution of Support for Royal Victoria
Hospital Expansion.
13. REPORTS OF COMMITTEES:
b) Planning Advisory Committee, minutes of January 30,2006 meeting.
15. IN-CAMERA:
a) Jennifer Zieleniewski, re: Personnel Matter.
b) Jennifer Zieleniewski, re: Legal Matter.
c) Jennifer Zieleniewski, re: Legal Matter.
(;::..~. >:C .....--~~ -~~~. .~- __ ""::'). :::-. ~~.~_ ~ ~.~ ~ ~. . -::::y--:::-~
I / r=::-- . .:'0,---= -v<':X::::"~. . . . . . ::::/: - . . '><5c-. ~-f.' . . - ,z:x. . .:?<:. .>:('~.. . .' .~.~. .----
<x~- .::',,:",. . :V.-;X.:-..J..... .........;:.. ...... ~. .7)<'.' ~.' ..... .z .'Q.
. . ?\?() -4 . ..' . '/X.~., ..' .... .... 'X..' '.. '. . . :?Ie . '. . -/. . ('x .
"""-'i'" ..", <"cm~-'ci",,~0 o/d;.. .<,,~l ^~I!
Yo., .);:. '.. l;"5{;N. ". .' .y. . . . .... .. f.'I.n .y.v.y.. .. .y. H. . .V..y... .11' ': :+;. ..y.y ..' . . . .' ... '.~. .
i'i<rm'.'~,~.:' . .' .. .. .. Ii .. III' :R:~'
'/.:.1:', . .' .
(, ~J' . .'
>(
/~
I . ., .'
/y.x...... . . , . :,<<'.'\.
~.,~. . . . ~.
/ r '1,'-,. ',. .',',.. l\
\ ~~~ Confers the designation of 2.)/).'W, II.
/I/'~ Associate Accredited Committee Secretary- Treasurer .~
\((( I ~S8 ACST(A) ..~~.q;
\\\Y.~; :'Sj"~ on .v.' ... .'/..,
\;y . . . >. 0'f
\>x> < <> . :...
Cl(~ .' An.du.l(araiskak.i$....o"\\
-I. ~~. )l~/) ~A/~/ ) X; ')
\1/.......,;.. . / L/21 . . ~~
>~;: Signed J..J /1;/ /JIU/ .H7 dLftl In effect November 18, 2005 :i: .X .~
I (~i . Pre,;d'rn V 0,,,,, ~,. I;
\~ S~",d I~g / Np,_" 1&2010 ~>,Z
!/ff;~ SecretawTrearer . . . Date . '., . ~ *\ \
\ I!..~: This certificate isthepropertyof the Association and remains In the possession of the person whose name itbearsQnly so long as such person remains a member in'go~dstanding. ~""
.\.. .':&..;
\~ . ~~
x.....x.e. . " .. .. III ... IIlIIII _.. " . .>::W'V I
.. . '. ... \/\ "'"VI',' ....':f:V\A .. ." ':v........ ..1\'1\ . 'fl' .. .. ." .... \'^'~ .' . :. . . . . ,..... -.J
Y~kz~' ...... . '. ."{: 'to,Y0AAJ .' ~xV::N.~"Vh~ ..W!/) ,'k .' ?r!sXx\A.1 .\I~ '.y..y.... -:JJ; . .V. .\ (.'{y.'..' VI 'Y,/d,'f' . m.\ . . :[:t'(.'A; '/..9' ~., :y.::;
('.,yl....~....~. .Ut. 15:.X.' .\....~x.... ''l..' c\.X; J:l:)' ....01:.j \ ~.'W ?f~'0'~'''' .'S' ..x.x.... 'W,'.)';',"Lj;.-1(: "''j:j~''0''':\ I\i'(
I L' ....... ,....y.. -';~'''.Y'''-'',',,' '0~...:;:,.c:',x,x')" ....... ........ .v..:,;::.... )/\'S).' .....I
I ..". -',.y x-:..~. .. . \:. .x.",. ",-,' .. . . v.' . . y.-..... Y'.
\\\,l....~5:~--...)JScf "\X...._~w ~...~ =:~~'::"."\;'\'''' . -\~ ~... -- '~.-':-;'1y.-
~_ ::~-_~'~-=..:.~~~==:~9'- ~.:~:..:~ ~ ~ i::~~::f'==-~~~-~
.
WS~B. Workplace Safety &
. ~.! Insurance Boato
ONTARIO
CSPPAT Commission de la securite
professionnelle et de l'assurance
l contre les accidents du travail
January 09, 2006
MR. DAN R TINNEY
TOWNSHIP OF ORQ..MEDONTE
148 LINE 7TH
PO Box# 100
ORO. ON LOL 2XO
Your identification card is your proof of your certification status. It should be presented, upon request, to Ministry of Labour inspectors.
CONGRATULATIONS
The Workplace Safety & Insurance Board congratulates you on your personal achievement in
completing the training requirements for the Certification Program. (Part One - Basic Certification
and Part TWQ Workplace.Specific Hazard Training).
The enclosed certification card is verification of the authority you have as a certified member,
provided you are the designated person on your joint health and safety committee. Your rights and
responsibilities are defined in the Occupational Health and Safety Act. I trust that you will do
everything possible to carry out these obligations in a forthright and effective manner.
I applaud your commitment to health and safety which will help prevent injuries, illnesses and
fatalities in your workplace. Thank you again for participating.
(. p'S/~
Carol Dos Ramos
Assistant Director, Prevention Services Branch
,
, '.f youn:ard idost or stolen,\"Ilofify ...ur :affi(es at.. -800-:663-6639
,
3459A 103/01)
~\
ORILLIA PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD
MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 2::t. 2005 MEETING
A regular meeting of the Library Board was held in the Children's Services Department
of the Library commencing at 7:04 p.m.
PRESENT - BOARD - C. Dowd, Chair; J. MacDonald, Vice-Chair; 1. Beresford;
C. Couper; J. Crawford; J. Francis; P. Spears
- STAFF - M. Saddy, Chief Executive Officer
S. Campbell, Director of Children's Services
1. Gibbon, Director ofInformation Services
D. Rowe, Director of Technical Services
T. Chatten, Recorder
ABSENT - C. Garland; F. Kreisz
DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST AND GENERAL NATURE THEREOF-None
CONSENT AGENDA
Item 5 g) to be added to the Discussion Agenda under New Business regarding OLBA &
FOPL membership renewals.
MOTION #2005:35
Moved by J. Crawford, seconded by C. Couper
November 23, 2005 meeting be adopted.
that the consent agenda of the
CARRIED
J. Francis will act as the timekeeper for the agenda.
REPORT OF FRIENDS OF THE LIBRARY
M. Saddy distributed and reviewed a report prepared by F. Kreisz highlighting recent
events of the Friends.
REPORTS OF BOARD COMMITTEES AND REPRESENTATIVES
Funding Feasibility Study - An interim report prepared by DV A Navion was distributed
and reviewed by those present. Interviews are still ongoing with more external than
internal interviews to be arranged.
Finance Committee - 2006 Budget - A summary of the operating, capital and
supplementary budgets were prepared and distributed for review and discussion.
MOTION #2005:36
Moved by J. Francis, seconded by C. Couper that the Library operating budget for
2006 in the amount of $1,451,040 (including the City Levy of $1,191,223) be accepted.
CARRIED
MOTION #2005:37
Moved by J. Francis, seconded by P. Spears that the capital budget for 2006 in the
amount of $200,000 be accepted. CARRIED
MOTION #2005:38
Moved by C. Couper, seconded by L. Beresford that the Orillia Public Library Board
authorize staff to make the expenditures as outlined in the report to the Board dated
November 19,2005 subject to the availability offunds. CARRIED
BOARD DEVELOPMENT - "Top Ten Reasons Why Libraries Fail" - C. Dowd led a
review of this item which was part of the 2005 OLA Superconference earlier this year.
She reviewed the Powerpoint presentation and handouts. The main focus of this and
the previous sessions is that the Library can't be all things to all people but it is
important to let the community know what we can do for them. The importance of
continuity and consistency from the bottom to the top of the chain of command was also
highlighted.
NEW BUSINESS
OLBA & FOPL Membership Renewals
MOTION #2005:39
Moved by C. Couper, seconded by J. Crawford that the Orillia Public Library Board
renew its membership in the Ontario Library Boards Associationfor $250. CARRIED
MOTION #2005:40
Moved by J. Francis, seconded by P. Spears that the Orillia Public Library Board
renew its membership in the Federation of Ontario Public Libraries for $1,500.
CARRIED
OLA Conference Attendance - C. Dowd and J. MacDonald will be attending along with
the library's directors. The cost of C. Dowd's attendance will be covered by the Ontario
Library Association, as she is on the conference planning team.
Wynn Wood Statue Restoration
MOTION #2005:41
Moved by C. Couper, seconded by L. Beresford that the Orillia Public Library have
"Mother and Son" restored under the care of Qennefer Browne at a cost no greater
than $980.00. CARRIED
Institutional Borrowing Agreement for Little Lambs Early Learning School
MOTION #2005:42
Moved by P. Spears, seconded by L. Beresford that the Orillia Public Library Board
authorize an institutional borrowing agreement for the Little Lambs Early Learning
School. CARRIED
Date of December Board Meeting - The Board agreed to hold the December meeting on
Tuesday December 20, 2005.
Upcoming Events at the Library - M. Saddy reported on the upcoming events at the
Library including a Lifescapes session on Thursday November 24 and December 13 at 2
p.m., the Good News report to Council at the Monday November 28 meeting at 7:30
p.m., the Volunteer Christmas Tea the Library on Tuesday December 6 at 3 p.m. and the
public meeting regarding budget discussions.
SOLS Trustee Council Meeting - C. Dowd reported on the recent meeting held at the
Barrie Public Library.
Meeting OLS and OLA - C. Dowd reported on the November 17'h meeting held between
representatives of OLS-North, SOLS and OLA COPLA, OLBA, ED). The purpose of the
meeting was to consider the best ways for the organizations to collaborate as they all
have a stake in trustee development.
MEETING EVALUATION
The meeting evaluation form for October was distributed with the Board package.
A new form was distributed for the evaluation of the November meeting.
Adjournment at 9:13 p.m. moved by 1. Beresford.
BOARD CHAIR
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF CHILDREN'S AND AUDIO VISUAL SERVICES
NOVEMBER 2005
PROGRAMS
A new session of story times has begun with full registration in Book Babies, Tales for
Twos and Threes, and Preschool Stories. Both Book Babies and Tales for Twos and
Threes are offered twice.
Family Storytime continued in November with excellent attendance. People are
enjoying the freedom of dropping in at their convenience.
Saturday Explorers for children from 7 and up was offered on the third Saturday in
November. The craft portion of this program was presented by Karen from Magpie
Beads. The children enjoyed making a wreath ornament out of beads as well as
listening to silly stories and a special felt board story.
Paws for Reading continued in November with enthusiastic attendance both from Dylan
the dog, Cassie, his handler, and the children who are reading to him.
OUTREACH AND PUBLICITY
Suzanne Campbell visited the Ontario Early Years Center and presented the monthly
library story program to a large group of children, parents and caregivers.
Children's Staff created and distributed the fall brochure.
Kelli Absalom is working on updating the Children's Services Web Page.
Book Displays included Remembrance Day, Christmas, and books like Harry Potter.
A grade seven class from Monsignor Lee visited the library and was given a tour by
Kelly Smith focusing on leisure reading, she also gave them a booktalk.
STAFF
Kelly Smith returned to work on November 1 on a reduced hours schedule for the first
two weeks of November and resumed regular hours in the third week of November.
Kelly injured herself during a Book Babies program.
REFERENCE
The number of reference questions answered by Children's Services staff remained
constant with a two percent decrease over November 2004.
Reference Questions: 2005: 449
2004: 457
. .....
MONTHLY REPORT
DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION SERVICES
NOVEMBER 2005
Concerning the possibility of signs on Highway 11 that would direct people to the location of the
library: the ministry has informed me that libraries do not qualify. The regulations outline specific
groups that do, and the library is not one of them. However, we could still get the City to allow us
to post pathfinder signs on city streets, if they are willing. (see my note in the last monthly
report)
With the assistance of Joanna Rolland, one of our faithful volunteers, I was able to update the
bibliography for Women and Children in Abusive Relationships that I had done in 1998. Since it
covers a number of areas, I decided to divide it into book marks, rather than produce one multi.
paged booklet, so I have delivered the first one to the Women's Shelter. Others will follow as
time allows.
The audio conference on branding had many ideas that we could apply to our library, including
ways that we could hone in on what sets OPL off from other institutions in the city. things like
knowledge management, continued learning and a skilled labour force. It emphasized
customizing your message for the group that you want to target - in Orillia, seniors represent the
highest demographic and it will probably be increasing, as boomers retire. It also emphasized the
need for staff buy-in, once the brand and targets had been determined. The marketing tools that
you use must reflect the needs of the target segment. I would recommend the book on the "Pike
Place" fish guys, by John Yokoyama. It was mentioned in another audio seminar "Library
Marketing that Works" that I was able to take last year. Their philosophy: connect with each
other and the customer; have fun; have a passion for what you are doing; make work play; make
the customers day; be there; choose your attitude.
I was asked by the TOMROMS committee to investigate which community colleges offer
Records Management courses and which ones have a coop session. Cambrian College was the
only one that fit the criteria. The committee was beginning to set a budget for looking at
software, hardware and personnel for automating city records.
I wrote my last article for the North Simcoe News. The publishers are retiring. It was an excellent
method to convey our future programs and new collections to the people in Oro.Medonte and
Severn. So perhaps someone will replace it.
I spent November 11 and 13th preparing for and supervising the tiling of the floor by the IS area
where the carpet was becoming a hazard.
Jayne had thirty-seven people attend her program on genealogy and between nine and twelve
people have been attending the Lifescapes program that she runs twice a month.
The last two sessions of Survival Guide for New Managers were presented in November,
emphasizing communication skills and balancing workload and management duties.
Diane Robinson, School Board Attendance Supervisor for public schools, came to our staff
meeting to help us deal with children who truant from school and spending their days in the
library.
SERVICES
Circulation
The number of items borrowed in November was 3% higher than in November of2004.
The increase was general, with more books, periodicals, sound and video recordings
being circulated. Since August, our library circulation has increased by 1731 items, 2.1 %,
over August-November of2004.
We also have had an increase in memberships, with 228 new members in November,
compared to 165 last November. For the year, our memberships are up by 180, or 9%,
over 2004.
Svstems
In November Geac Canada (suppliers of our Advance/Geoweb library system) accepted
a purchase offer from Golden Gate Capital, a private equity firm that owns market-
leading technology businesses. According to Geac this firm has the financial resources
needed to enhance the Geac products and services. They say "Geac's rich array of
product lines will stay intact and will operate much the way they do within our existing
structure, but they will be fortified by the strengths inherent in a large, global technology
entity". According to Geac staff, at this point it's business as usual, at least until the sale
is finalized in early 2006.
\CA~
.... . .
REPORT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
December 15, 2005
#1 UPCOMING EVENTS AT THE LIBRARY
These adult programs will be given at the library:
Tuesday, January 17, 2:00 p.m.
Tuesday, February 21,7:30 pm
Tuesday, March 21,7:30 pm
Tuesday, April 18, 2:00 pm
The Healing Power of Sound
The Craft ofSongwriting
Digital Photography
More Wildflower Gardening
Board members are encouraged to attend and, if you are willing, to introduce the
program. This represents an opportunity to raise the profile of the Board and deliver the
library message to the community from one of the many messages that will be prepared.
WHAT DO I HAVE TO DO?
1.
12.
3.
Welcome the people attending the program
Deliver a library message that will be written for you.
You are welcome to stay for the program but you don't have to.
If you think that you will be able to introduce one or more of these programs please call
me at 325-2573
#2 ANNUAL REPORTS AND HOW TO DO THEM RIGHT
This audio conference was delivered by Ken Haycock on Thursday, December 1 with
myself, Dave Rowe, John Crawford and Frank Kreisz in attendance. The working papers
for this learning opportunity will be distributed for the January meeting of the Board and
those who attended will lead the discussion.
Id:,- J
PRESENT:
Chair
Vice Chair:
Members:
Chris Carrier
Walter Benotto
Mary Brett
Orville Brown
Bob Currier
Lynn Dollin
Terry Dowdall (left at 12:30 p.m.)
Tom Elliott
Wayman Fairweather
Ruth Fountain
Ron Henderson (left at 12:30 p.m.)
Ralph Hough
Kathy Jeffrey
Mike McWilliam
Bob Marrs
Garry Matthews
Ross Money
Gord Montgomery
Brian Mullin (left at 12:05 p.m.)
Fred Nix
George Sheffer
Ron Simpson
Joan Sutherland
Barry Ward
REGRETS:
Robert Walker
Michael Prowse
STAFF PRESENT:
CAO/Secretary- Treasurer
Manager of Administration & Human Resources
Manager of Finance
Director of Land & Water Stewardship Services
Manager of Stewardship Services
Supervisor of Lands and Water
Manager of Watershed Monitoring
Water Resources Technologist
Director of Planning
Senior Planner
Administrative Assistant/Recorder
GUESTS:
Ontario Federation of All Terrain Vehicles:
The Township of Springwater:
Ontario Heritage Trust
Wayne Wilson
Susan Richards
Susan Whitters
Byron Wesson
Fred Dobbs
Greg Bray
David Featherstone
Brian Smith
Charles Burgess
Bev Booth
Laurie Barron
John Broderick
Wolf Schutt
Ron Belcourt
Graeme Davis
Jim McKever
Winanne Grant, CAO
Eleanor Rath, Clerk
Conor Begley, Admin Assist.
Barb Heidenreich
FULL AUTHORITY ANNUAL MEETING MINUTES NO.10-05 09 December, 2005 Page 2 of 10
MEETING CALLED TO ORDER
Chris Carrier, Chair, called the meeting to order at 9:04 a.m.
MOTION TO ADOPT AGENDA
RES. #1
MOVED BY: Orville Brown
SECONDED BY: Ron Henderson
RESOLVED THAT: The Agenda for Full Authority Meeting 10/05, dated 25 November,
2005 as amended by Agenda Addendum dated 09 December, 2005 be adopted.
Carried;
PECUNIARY INTEREST DECLARATION
None declared.
ANNOUNCEMENTS
Chair Carrier announced the resignation of Jennifer Levoie, Township of Amaranth.
Jennifer will be moving on in her career and her contribution to the NVCA Full Authority
has been greatly appreciated. Mayor Rob Currie, Township of Amaranth was welcomed
by the Full Authority as the new representative.
Chair Carrier announced that Tony Geurgis, Springwater Township will be stepping down
as representative for Springwater as he has been appointed Acting Mayor for the
Township. Mr. Ross Money was welcomed by the Full Authority as the new
representative.
PRESENTATION
Mr. John Broderick, Ontario Federation of All Terrain Vehicles made a presentation to the
Full Authority regarding the Objectives and Responsibilities of the Club in ensuring the
safe and responsible rider ship of its members. The purpose of the presentation was to
inform the Full Authority members of the various regulations and programs the Club has
established: i.e., Trail Etiquette Guidelines; Trail Wardening Package; Insurance
Package; Alcohol Policy: Land Use Agreements: Land Owners Flyer; and the benefits of
working with the OFATV.
Chair Carrier queried the intent of the presentation. Mr. Broderick advised that the
OFATV Group would like the opportunity to work with the Conservation Authorities to
resolve situations as they arise, specifically in the development of trail systems that are
effective and environmentally responsible.
Several questions of clarification were asked by the Board members.
FULL AUTHORITY ANNUAL MEETING MINUTES NO.10-05 09 December, 2005 Page 3 of 10
ADJOURN TO ADVISORY COMMITTEES
RES. #2
MOVED BY: Ralph Hough
SECONDED BY: Tom Elliott
RESOLVED THAT: This meeting of the Full Authority break into Advisory Committees at
9:52 a.m. to reconvene to Full Authority at 11 :10 a.m.
Carried;
THE FULL AUTHORITY RECONVENED AT 11:10 a.m.
ADVISORY COMMITTEE REPORTS:
LAND & WATER STEWARDSHIP SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE
RES. #3
MOVED BY: Tom Elliott
SECONDED BY: Garry Mathews
RESOLVED THAT: The report of the Land & Water Stewardship Advisory Committee
meeting dated 14 October, 2005 be received.
Carried;
REPORT OF THE LAND & WATER ADVISORY COMMITTEE, FINANCIAL
FORECAST REPORT - 25 NOVEMBER 2005
RES. #4
MOVED BY: Tom Elliott
SECONDED BY: Brian Mullin
RESOLVED THAT: The Financial Forecast recommendations of the Land & Water
Advisory Committee dated 9 December, 2005, be received by the Full Authority.
Carried;
PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE
RES. #5
MOVED BY: Kathy Jeffery
SECONDED BY: Tom Elliott
RESOLVED THAT: The report of the Planning Advisory Committee meeting dated 14
October, 2005 be received.
Carried;
RES. #6
MOVED BY: R. Fountain
SECONDED BY: Mary Brett
RESOLVED THAT: The Full Authority approves the Policy to Charge Fees for Planning
and Development related activities including the Schedule of Fees as amended and in
effect December 9, 2005.
Carried;
FULL AUTHORITY ANNUAL. MEETING MINUTES NO.10-05 09 December, 2005 Page 4 of 10
REPORT OF THE PLANNING COMMITTEE FINANCIAL FORECAST
REPORT - 25 NOVEMBER 2005
RES. #7
MOVED BY: George Sheffer
SECONDED BY: Mike McWilliam
RESOLVED THAT: The Financial Forecast recommendations of the Planning Advisory
Committee dated 9 December 2005, be received by the Full Authority.
Carried;
ENGINEERING AND TECHNICAL SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE
RES. #8
MOVED BY: Kathy Jeffery
SECONDED BY: Tom Elliott
RESOLVED THAT: The report of the Engineering and Technical Services Advisory
Committee meeting dated 14 October, 2005 be received.
Carried;
REPORT OF THE ENGINEERING AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE
FINANCIAL FORECAST REPORT - 25 NOVEMBER 2005
RES. #9
MOVED BY: Tom Elliott
SECONDED BY: Kathy Jeffery
RESOLVED THAT: The Financial Forecast recommendations of the Engineering &
Technical Services Advisory Committee dated 9 December, 2005, be received by the
Full Authority.
Carried;
Brian Mullin left at 12:05 p.m.
PRELIMINARY FINANCIAL FORECAST - BUDGET DEVELOPMENT DIRECTION
2006
RES. #10
MOVED BY: Kathy Jeffery
SECONDED BY: Walter Benotto
WHEREAS: Members of the Advisory Committees and the Executive Committee have
provided input into the development of the 2006 NVCA Conservation Programs with a
Preliminary Financial Forecast, requiring a 6.61% general levy increase (over 2005);
therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED: The Full Authority directs the Executive and Staff to develop a Draft
2006 Budget with a 4.48% increase in general levy incorporating the recommended
2006 Conservation Program direction; and,
THAT: The Draft budget be circulated to our member municipalities for input and
direction as per the Conservation Authorities Act; and
FURTHERMORE: That on February 10, 2006 the NVCA Full Authority Membership will
vote whether to approve the 2006 NVCA Budget as circulated.
FULL AUTHORITY ANNUAL MEETING MINUTES NO.10-05 09 December, 2005 Page 5 of 10
RECORDED VOTE: RES #10
In Favour
W. Benotto
O. Brown
C. Carrier
L. Dollin
T. Elliott
W. Fairweather
K. Jeffrey
B. Marrs
M. McWilliam
G. Montgomery
F. Nix
G. Sheffer
R. Simpson
J. Sutherland
B. Ward
Aqainst
M. Brett
R. Currie
T. Dowdall
R. Fountain
R. Henderson
R. Hough
G. Matthews
R. Money
Absent:
B. Mullin
M. Prowse
R. Walker
Carried;
DRAFT 2006 NVCA FULL AUTHORITY AND EXECUTIVE MEETING SCHEDULE.
RES. #11
MOVED BY: Ralph Hough
SECONDED BY: Tom Elliott
RESOLVED THAT: The Draft 2006 NVCA Full Authority and Executive Meeting
Schedule be received as amended.
Carried;
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS ENDING OCTOBER 2005
RES. #12
MOVED BY: Tom Elliott
SECONDED BY: Garry Mathews
RESOLVED THAT: The Statement of Operations Summary for the Period ending 31
October, 2005 be received.
Carried;
LUNCH BREAK -12:00 Noon
Deputy Mayor Terry Dowdal, Essa Township left during the lunch break
Councillor Ron Henderson, Essa Township, left during the lunch break
Approximately 12:30 p.m.
FULL AUTHORITY RESUMED AT 1 :00 p.m.
FULL AUTHORITY ANNUAL MEETING MINUTES NO.10-05 09 December, 2005 Page 6 of 10
MINUTES
Minutes of Full Authority Meeting 09-05, 14 October 2005:
RES. #13
MOVED BY: Walter Benotto
SECONDED BY: Bob Marrs
RESOLVED THAT: The Minutes of Full Authority Meeting 09-05, dated 14 October
2005, be approved as amended.
Carried;
BUSINESS ARISING FROM MINUTES
None noted
STAFF REPORTS
MANAGER OF ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES
. EXECUTIVE AND BOARD MEMBER PER DIEMS
RES. #14
MOVED BY: Mary Brett
SECONDED BY: Ruth Fountain
WHEREAS: The Executive Committee directed staff to investigate the possibility of
increasing member per diems for 2006 from the current rate of $59.40, which has been
in effect since 1992; and,
WHEREAS: The Executive Committee approved staff's recommendation of a cost of
living increase representing the Ontario Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation rate from
August 1992 to August 2005 of 29%; therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED: That the Full Authority endorses the Executive Committee's
recommendation that staff be directed to seek approval of the Ontario Municipal Board
(OMB), pursuant to Section 37 of the Conservation Authorities Act, to apply a cost of
living increase to NVCA members' per diems of 29%, bringing the per diem rate to
$76.68 per meeting; and,
THAT: The increase be retroactive to January 1, 2006: and furthermore,
THAT: Staff request a "blanket approval" from the OMB that would enable the Authority
to provide annual increases to the members' per diems based on the annual increase in
the Ontario CPI.
FULL AUTHORITY ANNUAL MEETING MINUTES NO.10-05 09 December, 2005 Page 7 of 10
RECORDED VOTE: RES #14
In Favour
W. Benotto
O. Brown
C. Carrier
R. Currie
L. Dollin
T. Elliott
W. Fairweather
K. Jeffrey
B. Marrs
M. McWilliam
G.Montgomery
F. Nix
G. Sheffer
R. Simpson
J. Sutherland
AQainst
M. Brett
R. Fountain
R. Hough
G. Matthews
R. Money
B. Ward
Absent:
B. Mullin
M. Prowse
R. Walker
T. Dowdall
R. Henderson
Carried;
. NVCA MILEAGE RATES
RES. #15
MOVED BY: Joan Sutherland
SECONDED BY: Bob Marrs
WHEREAS: The Executive Committee recommends to the Full Authority an increase in
kilometer reimbursement rate from 40~ to 45~ per kilometer: therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED: That the Full Authority endorses the Executive Committee's
recommendation that staff are directed to seek approval of the Ontario Municipal Board
(OMB), pursuant to Section 37 of the Conservation Authorities Act, for an increase in
kilometer reimbursement to 45~ per kilometer: and,
THAT: The increase be retroactive to January 1, 2006; and furthermore,
THAT: Staff request a "blanket approval" from the OMB that would enable the Authority
to provide annual increases to the members' per kilometer rate based on the annual
increase in the Ontario Transportation CPI; and furthermore,
THAT: The kilometer rate for staff be increased according to the approved 2006 rate.
Carried;
FULL AUTHORITY ANNUAL MEETING MINUTES NO.10-05 09 December, 2005 Page 8 of 10
NEW BUSINESS
None noted
CORRESPONDENCE
(a) Oak Ridges Moraine Stewardship Partners Update - Fall 2005
(b) Environmental Commissioner of Ontario 2004/2005 Annual Report-
Planning Our Landscape
(c) Provincial Policy Statement 2005: Comparison of Selected New Policies
to Former Policies in Key Areas - (Regarding the new PPS issued under
Section 3 of the Planning Act)
(d) Correspondence from Conservation Ontario dated October 13/05 re:
2003 CA Statistical Survey update.
(e) Correspondence from Bruce Singbush, Manager, Planning Projects,
Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, dated October 21/05 re:
Official Plan Mapping provided by the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and
Housing for the CANWET model development.
(f) Correspondence sent to Nick McDonald, Meridian Planning Consultants
from Charles Burgess, NVCA Director of Planning dated November 1/05
re: Site Alteration and Fill By-Law pursuant to the Municipal Act for the
Township of Oro-Medonte.
(g) Letter from the Treasurer, City of Barrie dated October 28/05 to the NVCA
re: 2006 Operating Budget with 2007 - 2008 Forecasts.
(h) Correspondence sent to Ms. Sharyn Ross, Treasurer for the City of Barrie
from Wayne Wilson, CAO/Secretary-Treasurer dated November 2/05 re:
NVCA 2006 Operating Budget with 2007 & 2008 Forecast.
(I) Notice of the 2006 Biennial Conservation Tour, September 11-13, 2006,
Cobourg Ontario, hosted by Otonabee, Ganaraska Region, and Kawartha
Conservation Authorities and Conservation Ontario
(j) Notice of Public Open House - Draft Innisfil Creek Subwatershed Plan
(k) Assimilative Capacity Studies Update #9 - September 29/05
(I) Joint Service Proposed to Operate Plants - November 8/05
(m) Correspondence from Bill Murdoch, MPP, Bruce-Grey-Owen Sound to
Wayne Wilson, CAO/Secretary-Treasurer dated November 4/05 re:
Thank you for forwarding a copy of the NVCA 2004 Annual Report.
(n) Correspondence from Conservation Ontario dated October 24/05 re:
Public Safety at Conservation Authority Owned Dams.
(0) MOE & MNR Source Water Protection Funding Announcement Nov 29/05
RES. #16
MOVED BY: Bob Marrs
SECONDED BY: Joan Sutherland
RESOLVED THAT: Correspondence not specifically dealt with be placed on file.
Carried;
~
FULL AUTHOFUTYANNUALMEETINGMINUTES NO.10-05 09 December, 2005 Page 9 of 10
IN CAMERA
RES # 17
MOVED BY: Fred Nix
SECONDED BY: Walter Benotto
RESOLVED THAT: This meeting of the Full Authority NO.1 0-05 go "In-Camera" at 1 :37
p.m. to address matters pertaining to security of the property of the Authority, a
proposed or pending acquisition/disposition/leasing of land for Authority purposes;
litigation or potential litigation, including matters before administrative tribunals, affecting
the authority; and
THAT: In accordance with the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act, Sec. 2(a) (iii), Sec. 5 (1)
& (2) the members from the Township of Essa, namely Deputy Mayor Terry Dowdall and
Councillor Ron Henderson be absent from the "In-Camera" session (10-05): therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED: That the following staff be in attendance: Wayne R. Wilson, B.Sc.,
Chief Administrative Officer/Secretary-Treasurer, Susan Richards, Manager of
Administration & Human Resource, Byron Wesson, Director of Land and Water
Stewardship Services and Laurie Barron, Administrative Assistant/Recorder.
Carried;
OUT OF IN-CAMERA
RES # 18
MOVED BY: Walter Benotto
SECONDED BY: Fred Nix
RESOLVED THAT: this meeting of the Full Authority No. 10-05 come out of "In-
Camera" at 2:35 p.m.
Carried;
RES # 19
MOVED BY: Walter Benotto
SECONDED BY: Fred Nix
RESOLVED THAT: Staff and the Executive continue to obtain information on future
options for the Utopia Conservation Area including a land appraisal not to exceed $3000
and that information be reported back to the Full Authority for further direction.
Carried;
FULL AUTHORITY ANNUAL MEETING MINUTES NO.10-05 09 December, 2005 Page 10 of 10
FUTURE MEETINGS/EVENTS:
EXECUTIVE - December 20/05
FULL AUTHORITY - January 13/06
ADJOURNMENT
RES # 20
MOVED BY: Mike McWilliam
SECONDED BY: George Sheffer
RESOLVED THAT: This meeting adjourn at 2:36 p.m. to meet again at the call of the
Chair.
Carried;
Chris Carrier, Chair
Wayne R. Wilson, CAO/Secretary-Treasurer
November 10, 2005
We build strong kidS"'J:f' Plus de vie a la vie
strong families, des je1ll1es, des familIes
strong communities. @ et de la communaute.
YMCA
Ms. Jennifer Zieleniewski
Chief Administrative Officer
Oro-Medonte Township
148 Line 7 South
Oro, ON LOL 2XO
-\
Dear Jennifer:
On behalf of the YMCA of Simcoe/Muskoka I would like to thank Township of
Oro-Medonte for participating in the Community Roundtable on Physical Activity.
The participation of Chris Carter has enabled us to achieve our goal of creating
the Lake Country Community Action Plan.
Enclosed is a copy of the Lake Country Community Action Plan Executive
Summary. The Community Action Plan is made up of three broad strategies:
Community Collaboration; Public Education; and Organizing Events and
Activities. One of the greatest strengths built by this planning process was the
group coming together, getting to know each other, and working toward a
common goal. For a copy of the entire report please visit
www.vmcaofsimcoemuskoka. and click on Community Roundtables.
The YMCA of Simcoe/Muskoka is committed to seeing this plan to its fruition.
We hope that the Township of Oro-Medonte will also continue to sit at the table.
We look forward to continuing to work you to help people be more active.
Sincerely,
~~~
Tom Coon,
Chief Executive Officer.
Cc Mayor Craig and Members of Council
YMCA ofSimcoe/Muskoka - Association Offices
11 Victoria Street, Suite 200, Barrie, Ontario L4N 6T3 tel: (705) 726-9622 fax: (705) 792-7874
\vww. ymcaofsimcoemuskoka.ca
110
U"i~..d""""'"
like to thank the following
to participate in this community
creating this Lake Country Community
@ City of Orillia
@ Georgian College
@ Good for life
@ Ontario Healthy
@ firilli" & District Sllccer Cillb
@ IJrilliil & District Coiielliilte ilml
\/IlCatli:lllallllstitllte
@ firili." Soldier's Memorial Hospitili
@ I.lrillia Today
· Orima Ycmth
· Mnjilumillll
@ 5:.im""" Commllnity Services
· Slmclle MlIskllka District Health
· The Ontario Trillillm
· Township of Om-Medonte
@ Township of Ramanl
The support of the Government of Ontario, through the Sport
and Recreation Branch of the Ministry of Health Prnmotion is
acknowledged.
The views expressed herein are those ofthe South Georgian
Bay Community Roundtable and do not necessarily reflect
those of the Sport and Recreation Branch of the Mioistry of
Health Promotion or the Government of Ontario.
The support of YMCA Ontario is also acknowledged.
"'~ W Ontario
half of Canadiall teellagers
sedentary
(Physical Activity Monitor, Canadian Fitness & Ufes/yle
Research Institute, 2004)
3 chiidren in Grade Olle spend
1 hllur/day Oil physical activity
Survey, 2002, Simcoe County District
in Grade Olle watch
llf more than 1
playing
Interventions, 2001)
This report is the cuimination of tll0 work at the Lake Country
Community Roond Table. Tlu"Ough a strength based
approach, the committee toe used on practical ideas to
improve physical activity levels for people in our communities.
The communities of Lake Country, for the purposes of this
report, are:
According to the 2001 Statistics Canada Census data, tl18
Lake Country communities have a total population of 67,783
people in this area of Simcoe County. Tile 2003 Canadian
Community Healtll Survey indicates that only 27.5% of the
population in Simcoe County is expending enough energy to
realize cardiovascular benetits. There is without doubt more
work to be done.
We know that healthy living and physical activity are essential
to both longevity and quality of life. We also know that
healthy living and physical activity are preventative measures
against disease and clrronic Ileal III conditions.
The members of the Lake Country Communify Round Table
are people who worl\ directly with citizens at the grass roots
level and include a broad cross section 01 voices and
interests. The work of the committee empl13sized unity of
purpose rather than dif1erences.
The dialogue fostered learning and built relationships towards
creating mutual understanding and a shared approach to
tackling tough issues. The efforl put forth by the individuals
and organizations involved in the process shows the true
commitment to making tllis action plan happen. The
compressed timeframe to accomplish an involved and ditlicult
task inspired the group te take up the challenge. Wllile seven
months was at times difficult, it reinforced tile importance of
taking quick actton.
This community action plan is tile framework to create
opportunities for change in our community. It is intended to
be a starting point from wllicll to grow. Flexibility is woven
througllout to ensure we can learn from our successes and
build on community ideas.
Our vision is, by 2010, to increase the level of physical
activity by encouraging people and organizations to take part
in action initiatives in these broad strategies:
1. Community Collaboration
2. Public Education
3. Organizing Events 8< Activities
1.1 lake Country Physical Aclivity Council - To
engage local organizations to share and disseminate
information to streamline efforls, as well as organize local
initiatives to get more people engaged in physical activity.
To offer activities tIlat will provide people with the
opportunity to try something new and encourage them to
be more active.
2.1 "Try il Oil" Fair " To provide a physical activity fair
that promotes local opportunities to be physically active
and offers people the chance to 'try something new' in an
active, hands on experience.
2.2 "Try it On" Seasonai Evenls - To coordinate a series
of 'Try it On' free events hosted by local organizations and
businesses, with the purpose of attracting new people to
those facilities and/or activity and get them hooked
to try it again.
2.3 Recreation Caravan - To create a travelling road
show of sports and recreation equipment that will
take place at parks in tile area.
3.1 Sclloois.. To provide support to increase levels of
daily physical activity for shldents.
3.2 local Governmonts .. To change the local
environment to create opportunities for physical activity.
comprises the sport strategy and physical
together address the deveiopment of amateur sport and initiatives to
increase physical activity in Ontario.
The goals of ACTIVE2lJ111 are:
. To enhance opportunities lor Ontarians to participate in
daiiy physical activity
. To Increase the number 01 Ontarians who vaiue and beiieve
participation In sport and physicai activity Is an Integral and
essentiai part 01 life in Ontario
. To create opportunities for Ontarians to become invoived in
quality sport activities
The objeotives of AGTIlIE201 0 are:
. Increase physical activity participation levels lrom 48% to 55% by 2010
. Implement the sport strategy in partnership with sector stakehoiders
. Enhance sport development leading up to the 2010 Olympics
. Leverage government resources to strengthen sport, physical activity
and the recreation sector
As part 01 the ACTIVE20l 0 strategy, a new and exciting partnership was
lormed between the Minlstrj of Heaith Promctlon and the Ontario YMCA.
A communltj based "Roundtabie" approach was designed tc create
community physical activity plans.
In early 2005, tI1e YMCA convened pecple and organizations in 16
communities throughout Ontario who share a passion for healthy, active
Hving and a sense of urgency related to current levels of physical
Their com men mission? To get people moving and living heaithier iiV8S.
Their Gommon task? To exchange information, experience and insight
toward the creation of a plan of action.
Across the province, more than 250 concerned citrzens, educators, and
representatives of government, public health, the media, business, and
organizations large and sma!i, came together to take stock of their
resources and to determine what steps they might take together.
Conversations percoiated for severai months in 8arrle, Bramptan,
Brighton, Cambridge, Chatham-Kent, Fort Erie, Kingston, lake
Mississauga, North Simcoe, Port Hope/Cobourg, Port Perry/Whitby, Sarnia,
Sault Ste. Marie, South Georgian Bay. and Sudbury. Each conversation
reflected the unique character. conditions and circumstances of these
communities. Each plan ncw provldas insight Into common and particuiar
challenges or opportunities. More importantiy, each pian is a map of
ideas, partnerships and programs ieadlng to different health outcomes for
specifiC groups of people.
The YMCA facilitated the deveiopment of the Roundtabies in the same
spirit it has supported the holistic development of Individuals for more
than 150 years. Its focus was on weicoming and including diverse
voices, emphasizing strengths or assets over deficiencies, and laking a
practical, "people-centred" approach to distinguish this work from other
reiated pianning processes.
are
Lists of strengths
group focus on how we
can bulid upon those group learned about current research
and trends end started to consider how people within our communities
couid be more physlca!!y active. A vision was crafted and a long list of
potential activities was brainstormed. Along tI1e way, the group
consulted with their staff, colleagues, friends and family to see if we
were heading in the right direction. The wider community was involved in
the development of the vision and community action strategies through a
community consultation and individual discussions.
Round Tabie members have made a commitment to continue to work
together. This continuing work will be coordinated and monltcred by a
community based steering commltiee made up of some or all
Community Roundtabie members.
The Communlly Roundiable welcomes new members to be involved
in this prooess. For more information aboui tl1is process, nexl steps
or how yo~ ca~ do ~ijt hesitate io contaci tl1e
Roundtabie Giida
giida_eveiy@ymca.ca)
Our goal WIth this community development plan is to help people in our
communities reaHze the Importance of a physicaJly active lifestYle and to
support tI1em to include activity on a daiiy basis. The success 01 tllis pian
wW be demonstrated through an increase in activity that is recorded in
these measures (Canadian Community Heaah Survey) in fUTure reports.
activity is all movements in
everyday life, including work, recreation, exercise, and
sporting activities.
Active living - According to Heaith Canada, is a
way of lile in which physical activity is valued and
We believe it is Important for aii to embrace heaithy living which Includes
heaithy food and lifestyle choices. At a population level. heaithy living
refers to the praotlces of population groups that are consistent with
supporting, Improving, mainfaining and/or enhancing heaith.
As. it applies to irdivlduals, healthy living is the practice of health
enhancing behaviours,or put simply, iiving in heaithy ways. It implies the
physical, mental and spirltuai capacity to make heaithy choices.
Healthy living means making positive choices about personal heaitl1 practices
such as healthy eating, not smoking, building a clrcie. of socia! CODfacts and
staying physically active.
Strolling Light walking Brisk walking Aerobics Sprinting
Dustng Volleyball Biking Jcgging Racing
Easy gardening Raking leaves Hockey
Stretching Swimming Basketball
Dancing Fast swimming
Water aerobics Fast dancing
No change Starting to Warmer Quite warm Very hot!
from rest feel warm perspiring
state heavily
Normal I SHght increase i Greater increase More out Completely
I in breathing rate I In rate of breath out ot hreath
information gathered from Canada'8 PiJysical Activity Guide (Heaftl/ Canada).
;:!>~ "We need to fit physical activity into our day - it should
l be like brushing our teeth - we just need to do it."
;:!>~ Add up your activities during the day in periods of at
l least 10 minutes each.
We need to describe to people how they can find ways
to be more active during their regular daily routines -
like parking their car at the back of the parking lot or
taking the stairs instead of the elevator
;:!>~PI1YSiCal Activity doesn't nece~SarllY mean participating
l.... .. .... in an organized activity.
;:!>~ Hey you active folks - try inviting someone yeu iove to
I... .. go for a walk with you - socia! supports work.
,
Parents - join the kids when they play!
~...1""~.". Try a walk break versus a coffee break (or waik with
. ,. .. .' . your coffee I).
;;
Go for a waik after supper to jump start your evening.
1!)~ Plan fun activities that get thewhoie family active like
SWimming, Diking, biking, skating, fnsbee, volieybaii,
or tag.
energy
Lori Beresford, Oriilla
Shawn Binns, Mnjikaning First Nation
Chris Carter, Township of Oro-Medonte
Ellen Cohen, Oriilla Today
Sue Cooke, Orillia & District Soccer Club
Mandy Duncan, Township of Ramere
Gilda Evely, YMCA of SimcoelMuskoka
Anna Faliore, Orillla Soldier's Memorial Hospital
Marcia Feddes, City of Orillia
Kevin Gangloff. Orlllia Youth Centre
Lori Hunter. Simcoe Muskoka District Health Unit
Mike Keaman, Georgian College
Tyler Kudar, Orilila & Dlstricl Collegiate and Vocational Institute
Pauline Padley, Simooe Community Services
John Pugsley. The Ontario Trillium Foundation
Leila Sherriff. Ontario Healthy Communities Coalition
Dave Sit, Good for Ufe
As a tihanks to Ihe who mede the decision to
allow the iist 01 members to take time away from their
tasks and in this process.
in Ihanks go 10 the many individuals and
organizations who look Ihe time to read tlle drall plan
and provide leedback,
Special acknowledgement goes to the following people/organizations:
City of Orlllia for providing meeting space
Tom Coon, OEe, YMCA of Simcoe/Muskoka
Sue-Ann Keefe, YMCA of SlmcoelMuskoka
Mary Anne Roche, YMCA Ontario Management Resouroe Centre
Martin Rutte, Eggz Graphla Communications
Greig Stewart, Consultant, Ministry of Health promotion
Oeborah Weam, YMCA of Simcoe/Muskoka
Myrna Wright. Heaith Promotion Consuitant.
Simcoe Muskoka District HealtllUnit
WHEREAS:
WHEREAS:
WHEREAS:
WHEREAS:
WHEREAS:
WHEREAS:
NOW
THEREFORE:
PROCLAMATION
"Black History Day"
February 25th, 2006
THE Ontario Ministry of Culture has, for the past two decades,
designated the third week in February as Heritage Week in the
Province of Ontario; and
the Ontario Black History Society recognizes February as Black
History Month, to raise awareness of the contributions made by
African Canadians to this country since 1603; and
much of the County of Simcoe's early history is linked to Black
settlement, yet the role of Blacks in building the County has not
been adequately acknowledged over the years; and
the first permanent inhabitants of the Township of Oro, now
Township of Oro-Medonte, were Slack settlers who were granted
land in Oro for their service in the militia; and
the Oro African Methodist Episcopal Church (built 1849) is one of
the last remaining log churches standing in Canada; and
the Oro African Church is recognized as a National Historic Site.
I, Mayor J. Neil Craig, on behalf of the Township of
Oro-Medonte Council and the Oro-Medonte History
Association, do hereby proudly proclaim February 25th,
2006 as "Black History Day" in the Township of Oro-Medonte.
J. Neil Craig, Mayor
Dated this 25th day of February, 2006
V0~-
Room 160
Legislative Building
Queen's Park
Toronto, ON
M7A lA4
rii
~
Constituency Office
First Sarnia Place
201 Front St. North # 407
Samia, ON
N7T 7T9
Tel: (416) 325-2837
Fax: (416) 325-3194
LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY
Caroline (])i Cocco
Tel: (519) 337-0051
Fax: (519) 337-3246
MEMBER OF PROViNCIAL PARLIAMENT FOR
SARNIA-LA,'dBTON
January 19, 2006
\
\
\
\
\ JP-N 1"\ 1UU~ \
, flfiEOONi'E. \
~
--
His Worship J. Neil Craig
Mayor, Township ofOro-Medonte
148 Line 7 S., Box 100
Oro, ON LOL 2XO
\\ECE\\JE
Dear Mayor Craig,
Thank you for your letter of September 26, 2005, addressed to the Municipalities of Ontario,
outlining your concerns about Bill 123 and indicating your support for AMO's position toward this
proposed legislation. I feel that considerable confusion about the intent of the Bill has been
circulating and would like to address some of these misconceptions here.
Bill 123, the Transparency in Public Matters Act, is in no way intended to be punitive, nor is it
intended to limit or take away any of the legitimate and necessary powers afforded to municipal
councils. It is certainly not an attempt to create confusion for, or place burdens upon, those
councils. A close reading of the bill should make this clear.
The spirit and text of the Bill simply allow two very important values to continue to flourish - those
of transparency and accountability - a goal that I believe all municipal councils across Ontario
support. Let me be clear that I believe most municipalities already possess these qualities in
abundance; however there is always room for improvement. With statistics indicating that, in at
least a handful of communities, upwards of 60% of council meetings are being held in-camera, I am
sure you will agree.
I feel it is worth looking at some ofthe Bill's provisions in detail in the context of AMO's concerns:
1) AMO claims that Bill 123 will compromise the provincial-municipal relationship.
. In no scenario will the proposed act allow the provincial goveinment to make decisions for
municipalities. Its provisions simply afford the public greater input into decision-making
processes,
E-mai!: cdicocco.mpp@!ibera1.o1a.org
Website:www.carolinedicocco.com
\\j ~ -
2) AMO fears that this Bill will conflict with the municipal act, creating confusion for
councils, their administration and the public.
. Section 23 of the Bill reads: "in the event of a conflict, this Act and its regulations prevail
over any other Act or regulation, except the Freedom of Information and Protection of
Privacy Act and the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act and
except to the extent that the other Act or regulation provides for greater openness of
meetings or greater accessibility to minutes of meetings. " .
. Confusion is eliminated by setting up a clear and consistent hierarchy of applicable laws.
This wording shows that, where there is a conflict between the Transparency and Municipal
Acts, the former will take precedence, eliminating uncertainty.
3) AMO argues that it needs flexibility to hold in-camera meetings
. This is a valid concern; complete public access to all meetings is not desirable, nor is it what
Bill 123 will grant.
. As outlined in section 5 (2), closed meetings are allowed when:
o (a) financial, personal or other matters may be disclosed of such a nature that the
desirability of avoiding public disclosure of them in the interest of any person affected or
in the public interest outweighs the desirability of adhering to the principle that meetings
be open to the public;
o (a.2) matters of public security will be discussed;
o (a.3) the security of the members or property of the designated public body will be
discussed;
o (b) a person involved in a civil or criminal proceeding may be prejudiced;
o (c) the safety of a person may be jeopardized;
o (d) personnel matters involving an identifiable individual, including an employee of the
designated public body, will be discussed;
o (e) negotiations or anticipated negotiations between the designated public body and a
person, bargaining agent or party to a proceeding or an anticipated proceeding relating to
labour relations or a person's employment by the designated public body will be discussed
As you can see, opposition to the Transparency in Public Matters Act is founded on interpretation
that is not correct. Passage of the Bill into law will not mean added burdens or reduced flexibility
for municipalities. It will, however, raise the bar for accountability and transparency, builds trust
and is an assurance to citizens that their public business is done in public. Many of you have run on
more transparency and accountability support and this type oflegislation is walking the talk.
I truly hope this letter serves to reduce some of the misunderstandings you may have had about Bill
123. Should you wish to raise additional concerns, please do not hesitate to contact my Toronto
office by phone (416-325-2837) or fax (416-325-3194). Thank you again for writing.
Sincerely,
{!~~
ill
II
If/ ---->
~~.J
Caroline Di Cocco,
M.P.P. Sarnia-Lambton
THE CORPOF-ATION Of ThE
N8IiI
j 48 Line I 5.. Fho:>: 100
Oro, Ontario LQL 2XQ
Phone {70S) 48-1.1. 17 j
1.;'<:<, (05) 487..0; 33
WWVv<OfG-;1jcc)onte,Cd
November 9, 2005
The Honourable John Gerretsen
Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing
777 Bay Street, 17th Floor
Toronto, ON M5G 2E5
Dear Honourable Gerretsen:
The Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO) has requested that the Township of Oro-
Medonte support the Association's position with respect to Private Members Bill 123,
Transparency in Public Matters Act, 2005. AMO's response to the Bill is that reference to
municipal governments be struck from the Bill and that accountability matters be dealt with
under the Municipal Act.
Oro-Medonte views the proposed legislation dealing with notice provisions, open meetings,
minutes, and forms of meetings, etc. as creating confusion for local councils, administration
and the public. This regulatory framework is currently addressed in the Municipal Act. The
Township has ensured, through the Municipal Act as well as Council's policies, that the
public is not only kept informed but given every opportunity to provide input in the decision
making of the municipality. Taking into account that the Municipal Act is currently under
review, it is suggested that any required modifications to accountability matters to ensure
"transparency" be encompassed in amendments to the Municipal Act.
I would therefore respectfully request, on behalf of Council of the Township of Oro-Medonte,
that the Standing Committee be urged to remove any reference to "municipal councils" or
"council committees" from the proposed legislation. I would further respectfully request that
you give consideration to voting against the Bill if this reference is not removed by the
Standing Committee.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Yours truly,
iJ~r0~
J. Neil Craig
Mayor
/jt
cc: Garfield Dunlop MPP, Simcoe North
Association of Municipalities of Ontario
Members of Council
~\
LAKE SIMCOE REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
MEETING NO. 800-11-05
Friday, November 25, 2005 - 9:00 a.m
Town of Newmarket Municipal Offices
"Council Chambers"
MINUTES
Present:
Councillor Roy Bridge, Chair
Councillor V. Hackson. Vice-Chair
Mr. E. Bull
Councillor K. Ferdinands
Councillor B. Huson
Councillor P. Marshall
Councillor M. Nanowski
Councillor J. Rupke
Regional Councillor S. Self
Councillor Neal Snutch
Mayor K. Shier
Councillor J. West
Mayor J. Young
Staff:
D. Gayle Wood, C.A.O.lSecretary-Treasurer
B. Kemp, AlDirector, Conservation lands
M. Valcic, Director, Corporate Services
M. Walters, Director, Watershed Management
R. Baldwin, Manager, Watershed Science
T. Hogenbirk, Manager, Engineering and Technical
M. Mironov, Manager, Accounting
J. Payne, Conservation Engineer
G. Casey, Recording Secretary
Regrets:
Councillor G. Davidson
Councillor B. Drew
Mayor R. Grossi
Councillor J. Moore
J. Dales, Honourary Member
G.R. Richardson, Honourary Member
Mayor R. Stevens
Mayor T. Taylor
Others:
M. Minnoch, Innisfil Scope
K. Hill, Hill Hunter losell law Firm
A. Byrne, Grant Thornton
B. Shelton, Town of Newmarket
S. Plamondon, Town of Newmarket
D. Avery, Rescue lake Simcoe Coalition
DECLARATION OF PECUNIARY INTEREST
There was no declaration of pecuniary interest or general nature thereof.
II APPROVAL OF AGENDA,
The Chair requested approval from the Board to move the scheduled presentation
and delegations forward in the agenda, before Item IV - Announcements.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
J. West
V. Hackson
(i)
Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority
Board or Directors' Meeting
BOD-11-05 - Minutes
Page 2
November 25, 2005
BOD-05-256
RESOLVED THAT the content of the Agenda be
approved as amended to include the "Tabled Items
and Other Business" agenda.
CARRIED
III ADOPTION OF MINUTES
(a) Board of Directors
It was identified that page 5 of the October minutes, referenced James Garland
representing Chisholm, Fleming and should indicate Region of Durham. Also, the
referenced resolution came from the Township of Uxbridge and not the Region of
Durham. These corrections will be made to the minutes.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
S. Self
J. West
BOD-05-257
RESOLVED THAT the minutes of the Board of
Directors' meeting No. BOD-10-05 be adopted as
amended to include the noted changes.
CARRIED
V PRESENTATIONS
(b) Generic Requlations
The Authority's Conservation Engineer provided a presentation regarding the
Generic Regulations which will regulate hazard lands, slopes, and wetlands.
The Authority's solicitor, Ken Hill, was present at the meeting to provide information
regarding the legal implications of the Generic Regulations. Mr. Hill reminded the
Board that this regulation must be in place by May 1, 2006.
The Board stressed the importance of addressing continuous shoreline erosion on
both public and private property and requested that staff report back to the Board
with some recommendations on how this could be done.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
J. West
V. Hackson
/
November 25, 2005
(i) Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authonty
"" Board of Directors' Meeting
BOD-11-05 - Minutes
Page 3
BOD-05-258
IX DELEGATIONS
RESOLVED THAT the presentation provided by the
Authority's Conservation Engineer, regarding the
updating of the generic regulation be received for
information.
(a) Jim Woodford
Due to the inclement weather, Mr. Jim Woodford was not able to attend the Board
Meeting as scheduled.
(b) Town of Newmarket
The Director, Watershed Management presented Staff Report No. 65-05-BOD,
regarding the relocation of a Heritage Home to the property located at the
intersection of Eagle and Church Streets in Newmarket.
The Director advised that this application is before the Board for approval as it
contravenes Authority Policy in that the property is located in the floodplain and is
subject to two metres of flooding.
The Mayor of Newmarket advised that all requirements of the Authority can be met
with this application with the exception of the one metre of flooding. However, the
Mayor further advised that this Heritage Home will not be used as a residential
dwelling nor will there be overnight parking which lessens the risk.
The Board requested that an agreement be registered on title which states that this
property will never be used as a residential dwelling and in the event of flooding, the
Authority would be held harmless.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
BOD-05-259
J. West
N. Snutch
RESOLVED THAT the request by the Town of
Newmarket to relocate a structure to the northeast
corner of Eagle and Church Streets be approved
provided that:
1. The Town of Newmarket provide the
Conservation Authority with an agreement stating
that the structure will never be utilized as a
residential building, and
,
\
Q), Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority
~ 80ard of Directors' Meeting
800-11-05 - Minutes
Page 4
November 25, 2005
2. THAT the Town of Newmarket provide a "Save
Harmless" agreement; both to be registered on title;
and
FURTHER THAT staff be directed to examine the
Authority Policy with regard to non-residential
structures and provide the Board with a future Staff
Report.
V PRESENTATIONS
(a) Grant Thornton LLP
Mr. Allister Byrne, Grant Thornton, outlined the 2005 audit process for the Board of
Directors.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
J. West
S. Self
BOD-05-260
RESOLVED THAT the presentation provided by
Grant Thornton regarding the audit process be
received for information.
N ANNOUNCEMENTS
(a) Conservation Awards Night
The CAO advised that, despite the inclement weather, the Conservation Awards
Night was well attended and a successful evening. The theme of the Awards Night
was a Salute to Watershed Municipalities.
Board Members received the award on behalf of their municipalities who were not
able to attend the event.
The CAO announced that Mike Walters, Director, Watershed Management,
celebrated 20 years service with the Authority.
(b) Donation - Office Administrative BuildinQ
Councillor John West, presented a personal cheque to the Authority as a donation
toward the "green roof' for the Authority's new office building.
Q). Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority
_ Board of Directors' Meeting
BOD-11-05 - Minutes
Page 5
November 25, 2005
V PRESENTATIONS
(c) Phosphorus Loads to Lake Simcoe
The Director, Watershed Management provided a presentation containing updated
information regarding phosphorus loading to Lake Simcoe.
The new data from the Ministry of the Environment indicates that the total
phosphorus load to Lake Simcoe is down; total phosphorus in the lake is down;
phytoplankton in the open lake is down; water clarity in the lake is better; dissolved
oxygen in the bottom waters is better; and there are findings of naturally reproducing
lake trout and lake whitefish in the lake.
It was stressed that, despite this new data and the improved findings, the work must
continue to improve Lake Simcoe and will be focusing on the significant near shore
weed issues. The Authority, through the Lake Simcoe Environmental Management
Strategy (LSEMS) will be looking to engaging the community in the development
of a remedial strategy.
The CAO spoke to the tabled minutes from the Rescue Lake Simcoe Coalition
(RLSC) which reflects the Coalition's concerns with the Authority. The CAG
indicated her disappointment with the comments from the RLSC however stressed
the importance of working with the community in order to avoid duplicating efforts.
The CAO advised that tthe Community have expressed disappointment with the
length of time it took to publish the new phosphorus loads data and they are also
questioning the science. The CAO indicated that she will be meeting with the
Ministry of the Environment to discuss the possibility of more frequent monitoring
and has also met with various Community groups regarding the science.
The CAO will be bringing a Communications Report to the Board that will outline
how the Authority can best work with the community.
The Board advised that LSEMS needs to have the pubic sitting on committees in
order to get the message out to the communities.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
J. West
B. Huson
BOD-05-261
RESOLVED THAT the presentation provided by the
Director, Watershed Management regarding
updated information pertaining to phosphorus
loads to Lake Simcoe be received; and
\
\"
~ Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority
.., Board of Directors' Meeting
BOD-11-05 - Minutes
Page 6
November 25, 2005
FURTHER THAT the Board of Directors fully
endorse further provincial funding of the LSEMS
program and that the province consider the LSEMS
program for special provincial status.
VI DETERMINATION OF ITEMS REQUIRING SEPARATE DISCUSSION
Items 12, 13 and item 14 were identified for discussion.
VII ADOPTION OF ITEMS NOT REQUIRING SEPARATE DISCUSSION
Moved by:
Seconded by:
J. West
N. Snutch
RESOLVED THAT the following recommendations
respecting the matters listed as "Items Not
Requiring Separate Discussion" be adopted as
submitted to the Board and Staff be authorized to
take all necessary action required to give effect to
same.
CARRIED
1. Fill. Construction & Alteration to Waterwavs Applications
800-05-262
RESOLVED THAT applications under Section 28 of
the Conservation ,Authorities Act and Ontario
Regulation 153/90, as amended by Ontario
Regulations 534/91 and 623/94, be received and
approved.
2. Correspondence
800-05-263
RESOLVED THAT the letter October 31, 2005,
received from Debby Beatty, President, Lake
Simcoe Conservation Foundation, thanking the
Authority for their ongoing support be received.
November 25, 2005
G), Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority
_ Board of Directors' Meeting
BOD-11-05 - Minutes
Page 7
3. Correspondence
800-05-264
4. Correspondence
800-05-265
5. Correspondence
800-05-266
6. Correspondence
BOO-05-267
RESOLVED THAT the email from the
Communications Specialist at Environmental
Systems Research Institute (ESRI) Canada,
commending Authority staff for their work on the
Ecological Land Classification and Existing Land
Use Mapping and further advising that this work will
be used for their 2006 Map Gallery calendar, be
received.
RESOLVED THAT the letter dated October 28, 2005,
was received from the City of Barrie regarding the
Authority's 2006 Operating Budget with 2007 and
2008 Forecasts be received.
RESOLVED THAT the letter dated October 21, 2005,
was received from Joe Tascona, MPP, Barrie-
Simcoe-Bradford, advising that he is unable to
attend the Conservation Awards Ceremony, be
received.
RESOL VEO THAT the letter dated October 11, 2005,
from the Township of Uxbridge regarding the
Floating Island Technology and thanking the
Authority for their assistance, be received.
7. Monthlv Communications Update
80D-05-268
RESOLVED THAT the Monthly Communications
Update, for the period October 1 to 31, 2005, be
received for information.
\
November 25, 2005
lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority
Board of Directors' Meeting
BO D-11-05 - Minutes
Page 8
8. Durham Reqion Forest - Standinq Timber Sales
BOD-OS-269
RESOLVED THAT Staff Report No. 66-05-BOD
detailing the record of tenders for Durham Region
Forest Tenders DRF-01-2005 and DRF-02-2005 be
received for information; and
FURTHER THAT tenders DRF-01-2005 and DRF-02-
2005 be awarded to Northern Pressure Treated
Wood.
9. Budqet Status Report
BOD-OS-270
RESOLVED THAT Staff Report No. 67-05-BOD
regarding the Authority's Budget Status for the
period ending September 30, 2005 be received for
information.
10. Lake Simcoe Environmental Management Strategy
Biennial Conference
BOD-05-271
RESOLVED THAT Staff Report No. 68-05-BOD
regarding the 2005 LSEMS Biennial Conference -
Event Summary and Future Recommendations be
approved; and
FURTHER THAT the Authority plan for a 2007
conference.
11. Proposed Federal Submission -
"Identification of Lake Simcoe as an Area of Concern"
BOD-OS-272
VII/HE ARINGS
RESOLVED THAT Staff Report No. 69-05-BOD
pertaining to a "Joint Submission Regarding
Identification of Lake Simcoe As An Area of
Concern" be supported; and
FURTHER THAT the LSRCA's Chief Administrative
Officer be authorized to work with Mr. Van Loan
regarding the submission of this proposal.
There were no hearings scheduled for this meeting.
X CONSIDERA TlON OF ITEMS REQUIRING SEPARA TE DISCUSSION
12. Results of Meetinq With Mr. Antonopoulos
November 25. 2005
Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authoriiy
Board of Direciors' Meeting
BOD-11-05 - Minuies
Page 9
The Board dealt with Staff Report No. 70-05-BOD regarding Authority staff meeting
with Mr. Antonopoulos, Town of East Gwillimbury.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
BOO-05-273
N. Snutch
B. Huson
RESOLVED THAT Staff Report No. 70-05-BOD
regarding the meeting between Authority staff and
Mr. Antonopoulos, which was held at the direction
of the Board at their meeting held October 28'h,
2005, be approved; and
FURTHER THAT staff be authorized to proceed with
legal proceedings should the Environmental Impact
Statement not be received by November 25, 2005.
13. Gobv Removal- Pefferlaw Brook
The Board dealt with Staff Report No. 71-05-BOO which provided information
regarding the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources' initiative to remove Gobies from
the Pefferlaw Brook.
Staff advised that pverall, preliminary indications are that this procedure was
successful, however the final results will not be known until the Spring 2006.
The Board requested that staff provide an update at that time.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
BOO-05-274
S. Self
K. Sherman
RESOLVED THAT Staff Report No. 71-05-BOD
regarding the removal of Goby from Pefferlaw
Brook be received for information; and
FURTHER THA T the Authority continue to work with
its partners to prevent the future introduction of
invasive species in Lake Simcoe where possible.
-\
,
November 25, 2005
lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority
Board of Directors' Meeting
BOD-11-05 - Minutes
Page 10
14. Monthlv Board of Directors' Meetinqs
The Board dealt with Staff Report No. 72-05-BOD regarding the Monthly Board of
Directors' Meetings.
After some discussion it was determined that there will be no change to the length
of the monthly Board Meetings. Members will attend meetings from 9:00 a.m. to
12:00 noon, or as long as is required to attend to the business of the Authority.
Board Members were reminded to confirm their attendance with the Executive
Assistant to the GAO, particularly if they need to leave the meeting early.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
BOD-05-275
XI OTHER BUSINESS
J. West
P. Marshall
RESOLVED THAT Staff Report No. 72-05-BOD
regarding the Monthly Board of Directors' Meetings
be received.
V(b) Generic Requlations - Tabled Aqenda
The Board dealt with Staff Report No. 73-05-BOD regarding the Generic
Regulations which was tabled at the meeting.
The Manager, Engineering and Technical Services reviewed the summary of the
Public Open Houses held the week of November 8, as well as the next steps as
outlined in the Staff Report.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
BOD-05-276
N. Snutch
V. Hackson
THAT Staff Report No. 73-05-BOD be received for
information; and
THAT whereas a local regulation to manage
development, interference with wetlands and
watercourses has been prepared in conformity with
the provisions outlined in Section 28 of the
Conservation Authorities Act, and standards for
mapping and public consultation have been
followed; and
\ 1
Q) Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority
"" Board of Directors' Meeting
BOD-11-05 - Minutes
Page 11
November 25, 2005
THAT the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation
Authority adopts the subject regulation; and
FURTHER THAT the said regulation and related
documentation be submitted to the Conservation
Ontario Peer Review Committee and subsequently
to the Ministry of Natural Resources for approval by
the Minister.
(b) General Comments
Councillor Paul Marshall congratulated staff on some very positive comments he
received from the Chair of the Severn Sound Environmental Association.
XII ADJOURNMENT
Meeting adjourned at 12:00 p.m. on a motion by J. West.
on'ginal signed by:
original signed by:
D. Gayle Wood, CMM III
Chief Administrative Officerl
Secretary-Treasurer
Roy Bridge,
Chair
Q1 iflJ of
OOrillia
\u~
ORILLlA CITY CENTRE
50 ANDREW ST. S.
ORILLlA, ON.
L3V 7T5
OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER
MANAGER OF COUNCIL SERVICES/CLERK
TELEPHONE
(705) 325-1311
FACSIMILE
(705) 325-5178
Mr. Keith Mathieson
Director of Engineering and Environmental Services
Township of Oro-Medonte
Box 100
Oro, ON LOL 2XO
DIRECT LINE (705) 329.7232
Email:llee@city.orillia.on.ca
U..~ /
n )j!
{Y~
f 1
./
D\
t .
\
\
,
January 19, 2006
\
Dear Mr. Mathieson:
Re: Treatment of Septage Waste
Further to your letter dated January 9, 2006, the following is a copy of a section of a report of
the Council Committee, which was adopted by Council on January 16, 2006:
"THA T as recommended in a report dated January 3, 2006 from the Public Works Department,
septage and hauled sewage from within the Township of Severn and other area municipalities
continue to be received and treated at the Orillia Wastewater Treatment Centre (WWTC);
AND THA T at times when there are capacity issues, operational problems or deterioration in
effluent quality at the WWTC the material from commercial, institutional and industrial sources
will not be accepted, while every effort will be made to continue to receive domestic septage
and hauled sewage. "
Sincerely,
p
~e, BA, A.M.C.T.
Manager of Council Services/Clerk
LSL:hr
Copy to: Peter Dance, Director of Public Works
Marilyn Pennycook, Clerk, Township of Oro-Medonte
H:\CQUNSERV\TQMRMS DIRECTORY\C - Council, Boards and By-laws\COO - Council, Boards and By-laws\COO Council\Correspondence\2006\Jan 16\sewage from Oro-
Medonte.doc- FileE03-GENxC12-C1C
To
: Marilyn Pennycook, Clerk
Neil Craig-Mayor
Harry Hughes- Deputy Mayor
\ () - \
From : Steve Astin family
425 8th Line North, Oro Station
Lol-2eO
Re : Proposed amendment to zoning bylaw and proposed plan of
Subdivision in the Town of Ora Medonte 2005-ZBA-22 and
2005-sub-O I. Matter also known as application by Try Recycling.
This letter is to serve notice of the opposition to the proposal made by Try
Recycling for land to be rezoned from AgriculturallRural to the Economic
Development to allow the development of a recycling plant and subdivision.
As elected officials of the Town ofOro Medonte, the Mayor and council
have been entrusted and empowered by the residents of Oro Medonte to
make sound decisions that are in the best interest of residents of Oro. These
decisions cannot and should not be based on a plan that deems a certain area
to be developed in an industrial way i.e. the th line northlhwy II area.
Just because the plan calls for industry to be placed in this location, does not
give way to having this type of facility (recycling plant) allowed at this
location.
I attended the November 28 hearing and heard the plan put forth by Try
Recycling. The plan projects that most of the recycling that would come into
the facility will be from "mom and pop" operations who have been
renovating their property. This is very far from the truth in the fact that the
plant is poised to be placed half way between Barrie and Orillia; two
communities that are growing and expanding at alarming rates. The
placement will allow easy truck access from these areas. Try advised that
95% of material would be recycled. That is an approximate amount and
would obviously be in a perfect world. The recycled amount would more
likely be in the area of 65-75%. After recycling, the remaining material that
is not recyclable goes where? You guessed it, to the Oro Medonte landfill.
This will now be filling up faster than we all would like, with material that is
coming from outside of the township and shortening the life of the facility.
\
I
"'-
The material being recycled wills no doubt being comprised of all types of
building material, some of which will no doubt contain material such as
asbestos, lead to name but 2. These items will be no doubt be in large dump
units that are emptied out for sorting and grinding. The resulting grinding
will then create dust that will be carried in the breeze to nearby farms and
residences and properties. These farms produce products that are for human
consumption and that when contaminated, will be useless. The farmers,
their families and employees will fall into financial disarray. The noise that
is generated from the facility is certainly not what people in the town of Oro
(predominantly a farming community) will appreciate. Try recycling will
also be composting organic material that would be sold off. The composting
process has the material sitting out in the elements and turned repeatedly to
aid in the composting. This turning/rotating then allows the by-product a
very pungent odor to be carried across the Township in variety of directions
depending on the wind. The Town ofNewmarket recently had a facility that
did the same type of composting. The residents were so offended that the
town took steps to stop the facility from compo sting. The rain and winter
runoff will also cause concern with various contaminants being captured in
the streams/swamps and marshes. The now- contaminated water will
eventually make its way to the lake (causing further pollution) and into the
ground, contaminating the groundwater that so many Oro residents rely on.
The resulting odor will be a great welcoming mat for persons arriving at the
adjacent airport. Do we want this to be their first impression of our town that
"it stinks". I would hope not. The compo sting also brings with it many
rodents mice, rats, raccoons, porcupines, and stray cats. I'm sure that Try
would intend to fence the facility in an effort to keep these animals out, but
they do and will get in. We will then will have a number of birds that will no
doubt frequent the area. The birds will be flying over the facility which is in
the direct flight path ofthe airport this is something that can cause serious
problems with planes and birds and can only lead to a disaster.
The properties located near this facility will suffer from a significant drop in
value and the investments that have been made in their properties will be for
naught. The facility will not be a large employer and will not be one that
provides a great boom to the local economy. There will no doubt be a
significant tax paid by Try to the Township but this will have to offset a
lower tax paid by area residents as their property values drop.
The Town ofOro has been a farm oriented community. That is why a
number of people have moved to the area, the writer included, enjoying the
peace, quiet and rural setting that is getting more and more difficult to find.
This is what makes Ora a special place to live and raise a family. We must
take steps to maintain its rural appeal and allow only those industries that
will make the Township more appealing and not turn potential residents or
investors away.
\()\ - \
January 2,2006
COMMUNITY TASK FORCE FOR PHYSICIAN RECRUITMENT
c/o Pamela Colquhoun, Physician Recruitment Leader
201 Georgian Drive, Barrie, Ontario L4M 6M2
Ph: 705-728-9090 x4294
Fax: 705-728-2408
Em;il: C~WP~rvh.~n.~a
II Lt.JL ",uf I XyY~ ~
/ '-l; , " ;..J(\ (
\ ' V"'f{\ (\ '0
.V \ \J
\
.'
Mayor Neil Craig
Deputy Mayor Harry Hughes
Council Members
Township ofOro-Medonte
148 Line 7 S., Box 100
Oro, Ontario LOL 2XO
Dear Mayor Craig, Deputy Mayor Hughes and Council:
On behalf of the Community Task Force for Physician Recruitment, I'd like to thank the council of
the Township ofOro-Medonte for the ongoing support ofthe recruitment and retention initiative in
our community. I would also like to take this opportunity to thank Deputy Mayor Harry Hughes for
his contribution to our Task Force.
We have made great strides in bringing much needed family physicians and specialists into the area,
but there is still a tremendous amount of work to be done. Health care human resources will be a
significant issue facing all residents of the area in the coming years and recruitment will be the key
initiative to alleviate the hardships ofthe physician shortage.
We have been successful in relocating twenty four new physicians to the area this year in the
following specialties (family medicine, paediatrics, pathology, emergency medicine, anaesthesia,
dermatology, intensive care medicine, and obstetrics). We have also brought on thirteen locum
physicians who have provided interim services for the community.
We have also been working hard in bringing local medical students to the community. A clinical clerk
from McMaster University, and resident ofOro-Medonte, spent two weeks in August 2005 with
Neonatologist Dr. Vincent Ho in the Royal Victoria Hospital's Special Care Nursery. TIlls clerk also
returned to the community and the RVH to spend time in the Intensive Care/Critical Care Unit in
December under the guidance ofIntensivist Dr. Giulio Didiodato. A key initiative of the Task Force is
bringing local medical students and residents back home to train. We feel this will aid in the
development of the learner, and also provide a means to recruit for the future.
The Task Force is also focusing on the personal needs of incoming physicians. We provide extensive
tours for all visiting physician throughout the entire community. Four of our newest members ofthe
medical community, two family physicians, an intensivist and an emergency physician, have just
moved to Oro-Medonte.
\ -
We formally request your financial support, in the amount of$15,000, to help limher our initiatives.
If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at any time. I can be reached
directly at 705-728-9090 x4294 or by email atcolquhounp@.rvh.on.ca.
Sincerely,
Pamela Colquhoun BSc, MEA
Physician Recruitment Leader
2
Ministry of
Community Safety and
Correctional Services
Ministere de la
Securite communautaire et
des Services correctionnels
~ Ontario
\ u\ - \
~
Office of the
Fire Marshal
Bureau du
commissaire des incendies
2284 Nursery Road
Midhurst ON LOL 1XO
Tel: (705) 725-7212
Fax (705) 725-7259
2284, chemin Nursery
Midhurst ON LOL 1XO
Tel: (705) 725-7212
Telec. (705) 725-7259
File Reference: 687-17 (Simcoe)
Reference. OFM-M,10-06
Mayor Craig:
January 16th, 2006
Mayor J. Neil Craig and Council
Township of Oro-Medonte
P.O. Box 100
Ora, Ontario LOL 2XO
The Fire Protection and Prevention Act, 1997 (FPPA) establishes municipal
responsibilities for the provision of fire protection services as well as provincial
responsibilities to monitor and review the delivery of municipal fire protection services.
The Office of the Fire Marshal (OFM) has recently received an expression of concern
regarding the fire suppression services in your municipality. We were pleased to have
the opportunity to discuss that concern with you (along with other issues related to
process) during a meeting at your municipal office on January 10, 2005. In order to
objectively investigate this concern, the OFM will be reviewing response information in
respect of reported structure fires in your municipality for a period of at least 60 days.
A Reported Structure Fire Includes:
. a working fire
. a telephoned or still alarm indicating a fire at a building
. an indication that a fire alarm or automatic sprinkler system has been activated in
a building
Fire Protection Adviser Peter Jobe will be contacting Director of Emergency Services,
Scott Cowden to provide him/her with a report template that has been designed by the
OFM to facilitate the gathering of information and to further discuss our information
requirements.
The OFM appreciates your municipality's anticipated cooperation in providing
emergency response information. Should you or any other municipal officials require
additional information, please call me at 705-725-7212.
FFPS 08-01
Sincerely,
~~
~-
Paul Leslie, Operations Manager
Southwestern Region
Fire Protection Services
cc: CAO Jennifer Zieleniewski
~ ,~M""<:"~
Director of Emergency ervices Scott Cowden
FFPS 08-01
;
e
e
e
\D
-\
\
\ RECE'\lED~\
\
JAN 2 7 1006
ORO"MEDONTE
TOWNSHIP
~
/'
.
.
e
.
e
~/
/-JJ///Z}Cc/7f/,
/lv;/
a./7/C /'
.
\
0c" b'wr
\
)
/
c:Z
t::Z
c:2
{tAl
/70
~
e
.
e
\
?
.
.
e
dh)Y{ a//
/c;a:-/;r;/:.5" Y!/l~zsZ'
/Y-'JO/Y h/77
~//
a
0/7
/i:t???c,
//
d/&
JAN-27-2006 16:11
PLANNING SERVICES
705 7394270
P,01
CITY I!ALL
70 COLLIER STREET
'l'tl" 705-739-4112
FAX 70S.7n-4240
P.O, BOX 400
BARRIE.OIo1'fi\RIO
lAM 4TS
~~~;n
TIlE CORPORA nON OF nit; CITY OF BARRIE
COMMIS;;ION~R, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
~Committf!!d to Service E%ceUent:f!"
January 27. 2006
Via FaxlOriginal to Follow via Mail
Fax: 705-487-0133
.'
Mr. Bruce Hoppe, Director of Planning
Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte
148 Line 7 South. PO Box 100
Oro, Ontario
LOL 2XO
RE: Try Recycling - Proposed Amendments to the Zoning By.law & Proposed Plan of
Subdivision of Concession 8, West Part of Lot 19
',,"
Dear Mr, Hoppe:
Further to the Notice of Public Meeting held on November 28, 2005, staff have had the opportunity to
review the material submitted by the applicant in support of the applications and we hereby provide the
following comments with respect to the proposed zoning by-law amendment and proposed draft plan of
subdivision for "other industrial" development, which is proposed to the east of the Lake Simcoe Regional
Airport (LSRA).
The City of Barrie promotes the economic development of the region and considers the LSRA facility as a
significant asset to the regional economy. We have been working with our municipal partners at LSRA on
opportunities for the development of the airport lands as a gateway business facility, Having recently
completed a comprehensive review of our employment lands, we have gained some insight into the
difficulties involving incompatible uses being mixed together and the impact this has had on our industrial
businesses, and we are concerned that this proposal may jeopardize future opportunities in the area.
The 2005 Provincial Policy Statement (2005 PPS) speaks to the need to plan for land uses in the vicinity
of airports so that the long-term operation and economic role of airports is protected. Further, Airports
and sens~ive land uses should be appropriately designed, buffered and separated from each other to
prevent adverse effects from odour, noise and other contaminants. The policy goes on to state that
Airports shall be protected from incompatible land uses and development by discouraging land uses
which maYcause a potential aviation safety hazard, (Policy 1,6,7,' and 1,6,7,2)
Similarly, Policy 1.7_1 Long Term Economic Prosperity states that long-term economic prosperity should
be supported by optimizing the iong-term availability and use of land, resources, infrastructure and pUblic
service facilities by planning so that major facilities such as airports and sensitive land uses are
appropriately designed, buffered andlor separated from each other to prevent adverse effects from odour,
noise and other contaminants, and by providing opportunities for sustainable tourism development.
-("'::> '(.:\:i4;<'(I<!
P.02
. Ltr to Mr. Bruce Hoppe, Director of Planning
Re: Try Recycling
".12
The City of Barrie takes some comfort in the fact that both the County of Simcoe Official Plan and the
Oro-Medonte Official Plan recognize the regional importance of the LSRA as renected in Policy 3.9 and
3.9.4 of the County Official Plan and Section C10 of the Oro-Medonte Official Plan.
Section 3.9 of the County of Simcoe Official Plan states:
"Special Development Areas recognize major commercial industrial and recreational areas or a
combination thereof, associated with the particular attractions or infrastructure in the County such
as Casino Rama, and the Lake Simcoe Regional Airport. The County of Simcoe recognizes such
areas through a County Official Plan designation and local municipalities should comprehensively
plan such areas in order to maximize their economic benefits and long term vitality while ensuring
that development patterns and designs recognize and protect environmental features and
functions. "
In addition, Policy 3.9.4 states:
'Special Development areas shall be mapped and planned on a comprehensive basis in order to
assess and address the cumulative impacts associated with such development proposals and in
order to comprehensively develop related services and infrastructure, particularly water, sewage,
storm water management, and transportation facilities."
Section C10 of the Orc-Medonte Official Plan recognizes the role of the Lake Simcoe Regional Airport
under the objectives of the Airport designated lands which states:
'To recognize the location of the Lake Simcoe Regional Airport and the role it plays in the
regional economy."
We suggest that the industrially designated lands adjacent to the Airport should be comprehensively
planned. Consideration should be given to restricting incompatible uses and providing for uses that
complement the Airport facility. In addition, we suggest that specific site plan gUidelines should be
developed for the area, which should include specific requirements for buffering screening and
landscaping from the 7th Line.
Despite the many benefits of recycling uses, they are uses which have significant impacts including noise,
odour, traffic, potential groundwater and aesthetic impacts which are incompatible with the long term
potential for the area, Our specific concerns with the proposed recycling facility should it proceed, are
noted as follows:
1. The proposed zoning will exempt the proposed recycling facility from requiring a "building", and
we question how site plan control will be brought into effect without the need for a building permit.
We request that assurances be provided that rigorous site plan control will be applied to the
proposed recycling activities on site. Site plan control shOUld address the potential impacts,
inCluding fencing, landscaping, and berming around the perimeter of the site.
2. There is no long-term guarantee that the proposed recycling and other industrial uses will exclude
composting or processing of household waste. These uses are potential attractants for birds and
may affect the Airport operations. The Township of Ora-Medonte should be requested to ensure
that the permitted recycling operations will exclude activnies that would be an attractant to birds.
3. Insufficient detail is available with respect to the operations of the site and we suggest further
details would assist in evaluating potential impact, if any, on the Airport operations, inCluding
consideration of flight lines, impact on communications, traffic and dust.
In summary, our primary concerns wnh the proposed applications relate to protection of the long term
viability of the employment lands around the Airport and the future operations of the Airport, which is
outlined in The Provincial Policy Statement and, in our view is expressed in the objectives and the intent
of the County Official Plan and the Oro-Medonte Official plan_ We suggest that this is best achieved
through considered comprehensive planning for the area,
"THE PEOPLE ARE THE CITY"
JRN-~'I-~"elb lb: l~
~LRNNING SERVICES
705 7394270
P.03
< "
Ltr to Mr. Bruce Hoppe, Director of Planning
Re: Try Recycling
.../3
In addition we have some specific concerns relating to the proposed recycling facility, and the need for
more detailed information to determine potential impacts on the Airport operations.
In conclusion, The City of Barrie has a definite interest in how the development around the Airport lands
proceeds, and we hereby request that we be notified when this matter next comes before Committee of
the Whole or Council for consideration, and that we receive copies of any additional staff or consultants
reports with recommendations regarding this matter.
Further, pursuant to Section 34(18) of the Planning Act, and Section 51(20) and (23) Planning Act, the
City hereby requests notice of the passing of the zoning by-law amendmenL and consultation and
notification with respect to the proposed draft plan of subdivision from the Township of Ora-Medonte and
the County of Simcoe.
We also request notification of further public meetings, hearings or decisions with respect to the subject
lands, and we request that we be kept informed should any related applications under the Planning Act
be submnted with respect to these lands,
On behalf of the City of Barrie, I would like thank you for providing the opportunity to comment and would
be happy to participate in further consultation with respect to the subject proposal.
Yours truly,
~" ~~-~~X
Gary Calvert
Commissioner, Development Services
GClkb
cc County of Simcoe, Planning Department
City of Orillia, Planning Department, City Manager's Office
Lake Simcoe Regional Airport Commission
"THE PEOPI.E ARE THE CITY"
TOTAL P,03
1!~)~~1jo~
~
Dennis A. Trinaistich
Barrister and Solicitor
January 27,2006
Via E-Mail & Regular Mail
~I
I .IAN 2 7 2006 II
I ORO-MEDONTE
I TOWNSHiP j
Bruce Hoppe, MCIP, RPP
Director of Planning
Township ofOro-Medonte
148 Line 7 South, P.O. Box 100
Oro ON LOL 2XO
Re: TRY Recycling Inc. - Proposed Rezoning
Part of Lot 19, Con. 8, Oro Geographic Township
The Corporation ofthe Township of Oro-Medonte (the "Township")
Township File No. 2005-ZBA-22
I am the solicitor for Weatherwise Aviation Inc_, and Ukcan Investments Inc., (collectively,
"Weatherwise"), the owners of lands located on the west side of Line 7, across the road from the
proposed recycling project. My clients' lands are described as Part of Lot 19, Con. 7, being Parts
2, 3, 4 and 5, Plan 5IR-31319, in the geographic Township of Oro. These lands are situated
within the Lake Simcoe Regional Airport property. Weatherwise also owns certain other lands
within the airport property municipally known as 440 - 7th Line North. For convenience, I refer
to all of these holdings collectively as the "Weatherwise Lands" in the balance of this letter.
Weatherwise is in the process of finalizing certain dealings with parties who intend to construct
and occupy head office operations on the Weatherwise Lands, Maintaining the prestigious
nature of development of this area, in keeping with the aspiration to promote the airport
operation, is of vital importance to Weatherwise, as it is to the area municipalities and the public
interest. My clients therefore have an interest in the above rezoning.
You have advised me that Council has set today as the "deadline" for receiving public comments
on the above matter. You have however also assured me that I can continue to make timely
written submissions regarding my clients' concerns. The purpose of this letter is to place my
clients' concerns on the record in a preliminary manner, with a more detailed expression of
concerns to follow.
Weatherwise is opposed to the proposed rezoning (and related land use) on at least the following
grounds:
I, Consistency with the Provincial Policy Statement.
P.O. Box 644, Parry Sound, Ontario P2A 2Z1 Phone: 416.708.6351 Email: datlaW@cogeco.ca
~
.
.
Dennis A. Trinaistich
Page 2
2. Conformity with the County of Simcoe Official Plan.
3. Conformity with the Township Official Plan.
4. Compatibility with the intended and planned character of the area.
5. Compatibility with the safe operation ofthe airport,
6. Compatibility with the intended and permitted use of the Weatherwise Lands.
7. Potential for an adverse effect on the value of the Weatherwise Lands for their intended and
permitted uses.
While the above are very preliminary and general expressions of concern, they are validly held
and reasonably predictable concerns in all of the circumstances. In the next week or two I will
more fully present my clients' concerns about the proposed rezoning.
In the interim, kindly ensure that I receive timely advance written notice of any future events
associated with the proposed rezoning. In particular, and without limiting the generality of the
foregoing, by directed copy of this letter I am formally requesting that the Clerk provide me with
written notice of the passing of any bylaw to give effect to the proposed rezoning, along with
advance written notice of any meeting of Councilor its Committee(s) at which the proposed
rezoning is to be considered.
Please accept my thanks to you and your staff for assisting me yesterday. I look forward to
discussing this matter further with you over the coming weeks.
Yours truly,
Dennis A. Trinaistich
c. Marilyn Pennycook, Clerk, Township ofOro-Medonte
c. Pete Waters, Weatherwise Aviation Inc.
-. \~
Lake Simcoe Regional Airport
224 Line 7 North, RR#2
Oro Station, Ontario
Canada
LOL 2EO
Pbone: (705) 487-0999 Fax: (705) 487-1411
Email: Isra@csolve.net Web: www.lakesimcoeairport.com
January 25, 2006
Mr. Bruce Hoppe, Director of Planning
Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte
148 Line 7 South, PO Box 100
Oro, Ontario
LOL 2XO
JAN 2 6 2006
ORO-N/EOO
TOWNSH1~l1:.
RE: Try Recycling - Proposed Amendments to the Zoning By-law & Proposed Plan of
Subdivision of Concession 8, West Part of Lot 19
Dear Mr. Hoppe:
In accordance with the Township of Oro-Medonte Notice of Proposed Amendments to the
Zoning by-law as well as the Proposed Plan of Subdivision of the lands described as
Concession 8, West Part of Lot 19, the Lake Simcoe Regional Airport Commission submits
the following comments, general concern and overall objection with the subject application.
The long-term economic implications of establishing a recycling use, which potentially has
significant impacts on what is currently the main point of entry for international business and
tourism should be seriously considered in this location. Activities on lands surrounding Airports
are regulated federally through the Canadian Aviation Regulations. In addition, Transport
Canada has published land use guidelines that promote compatible airport and community
development in a document entitled "Land use in the Vicinity of Airports." Land use is further
controlled provincially and locally through the Planning Act, the Provincial Policy Statement
(2005 PPS), and Official Plans and Zoning By-laws.
The Lake Simcoe Regional Airport is a facility that accepts international passengers and
freight, and is an asset to the regional economy. The Commission has been working with our
municipal partners to develop a gateway business facility. Companies such as The
Weatherwise Group (Weatherwise Aviation) have invested in the airport and are now receiving
significant interest from companies looking at LSRA as their future home. Increases in landing
fees and rents at Lester B. Pearson International Airport are forcing out "non-commercial"
aviation businesses, which are now looking at the Lake SimcDe Regional Airport. We are
developing a momentum that will quickly be stopped if this or a similar use is approved for this
area significantly affecting the strategic and master plans.
It would be more fitting from an economic development point of view to preserve the industrially
designated lands near the airport for industrial uses which are compatible with, or are related to
the airport activities.
1
Policy 1.6.7 Infrastructure of the 2005 Provincial Policy Statement (2005 PPS) requires that
planning for land uses in the vicinity of airports protect the long-term operation and economic
role of airports, and that airports be protected from incompatible land uses and development by
discouraging land uses which may cause a potential aviation safety hazard. Furthermore,
Policy 1.7.1 of the 2005 PPS states that long-term economic prosperity should be supported by
optimizing the long-term availability and use of land, resources, infrastructure and public
service facilities by planning so that major facilities such as airports and sensitive land uses are
appropriately designed, buffered and/or separated from each other to prevent adverse effects
from odour, noise and other contaminants, and by providing opportunities for sustainable
tourism development.
The County Official Plan gives recognition to the regional significance of the LSRA and treats
the Airport as a Special Development Area. The Plan states that these Special Development
Areas recognize major commercial industrial and recreational areas or a combination thereof,
associated with the particular attractions or infrastructure in the County such as Casino Rama,
and the Lake Simcoe ReClional Aif1Jort. The County of Simcoe recognizes such areas
through a County Official Plan designation and local municipalities should comprehensivelv
plan such areas in order to maximize their economic benefits and 10nCl term vitalitv while
ensuring that development pattems and designs recognize and protect environmental features
and functions." It is suggested that this is more appropriately addressed through a secondary
plan for a broader area as opposed to development by plan of subdivision. The policies for the
airport designation of the Oro-Medonte Official Plan also give recognition to the significance
of the airport with the following objective: "To recoClnize the location of the Lake Simcoe
ReClional Airport and the role it p/avs in the reClional economv" It would appear that the
basis for designating the subject lands industrial in the Oro-Medonte Official Plan is in part due
to the proximity to the Airport, and hence should be developed with this objective in mind.
A review of the applicant's submissions in support of the application does not show how the
proposed development is consistent with the 2005 PPS and does not appear to fully address
the intent of the Special Development Areas policy of the County Official Plan, and the vision of
the Oro-Medonte Official Plan.
It is noted with concem that the proposed site-specific zoning effectively exempts the proposed
recycling facility from any need of a "building". In addition, it is noted that there are no long-term
guarantees that the proposed recycling and other industrial uses will exclude composting or
processing of household waste. Insufficient detail has been provided with the application with
respect to the operations of the site, and "other proposed industrial uses" in order to evaluate
potential impact, if any, on the airport operations. The following items are raised as potential
concems:
. The use of heavy equipment on the site such as cranes, conveyor belts and
communications systems, which may interfere with airport operations.
. The impact, if any, of stockpiling, and berming in terms of height in relation
to flight paths.
. Activities that may attract birds, in particular recycling of household waste
such as composting facilities. The Township should ensure these activities
could not occur at some future date on either the recycling facility or on
other industrial lands.
. Dust generated from the site.
2
.'
\
.
Truck traffic
In summary, recycling facilities are uses, which have significant impacts including noise,
odour, traffic, potential groundwater impacts, and aesthetic considerations. The Lake
Simcoe Regional Airport Commission's concems relate to the economic impact on
regional facility, and the need for greater detail in terms of the site development and the
development of "other" industrial uses as proposed. Additional detail would assist in
determining potential impacts, if any, on the airport operations.
It is questionable whether the proposal is consistent with the 2005 PPS, the intent of the
County Official Plan, and objectives for the Airport lands in the Oro-Medonte Official Plan.
The Lake Simcoe Regional Airport Commission is concerned as to how site plan control
will be effected without the need for a building permit on the proposed recycling facility
site, and recommend, as a minimum, that site plan control guidelines be developed for the
industrial lands fronting on the seventh line.
Having noted these concerns and objection to the proposed rezoning and subdivision
application, the LSRA requests the opportunity to review and comment on any additional
detailed information that may be on file or submitted in the future by the subject applicant
It is further requested that the Lake Simcoe Regional Airport and all of its tenants be kept
informed by the Township of Oro-Medonte and the County of Simcoe regarding the
progress of the applications, and that we be notified of any decisions with respect to the
applications.
In closing, I would like to take this opportunity to ensure that the Lake Simcoe Regional
Airport as well as any other landowners within the airport property boundaries, are properly
notified, in accordance with Section 34 of the Planning Act, of any future applications of
the lands described herein.
On behalf of the Lake Simcoe Regional Airport Commission, I would like thank you for
providing the opportunity to comment and would be pleased to participate in further
consultation with respect to the subject proposal.
Michael J. Drumm
Airport Manager
cc County of Simcoe, Planning Department
City of Barrie, Planning Department, City Administrator's Office
City of Orillia, Planning Department, City Manager's Office
Weatherwise Aviation
Lake Simcoe Regional Airport Commission
3
CD
\()\2...-\')
TO THE ORO MEDONTE COUNCIL MEMBE
FROM DOUG & SHARON MCBRIDE # 610 LIN
RECEIVED
8 N\N 2 7 2006
ORO-MEDONTE
TOWNSHIP
COMMENTS AND CONCERNS REGARDING
TRI RECYCLING'S PROPOSED LOCATION
1. SOLID WASTE POLLUTION TO THE PROPOSED
SITE AND THE SURROUNDING LAND (there is the
possibility that toxic substances attached to waste recycling
will be imported to the proposed site and poOute the site and
the surrounding properties) DOES THE TOWNSHIP
NEED THE FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY OF THIS
LIABILITY, WE ALL KNOW THAT COMPANIES CAN
QUICKLY GO BANKRUPT
2. WATER POLLUTION TO THE PROPOSED SITE AND
THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES. HAS LAKE
SIMCOE CONSERVATION ATHUORITY APPROVED
THE PROPOSED WCATION
3. DEV ALUA TION OF THE SURROUNDING
PROPERTIES. IT IS A CERTAINTY THAT THE
SURROUNDING FARM PROPERTIES WILL
EXPERIENCE A MONETARY DEVALUATION (would
you purchase a farm that was next to or close a waste
recycling plant?)
MY PERSONAL EXPERIENCE WITH MY PROPERTY
AT #610 LINE 81S AS FOLLOWS,
I WAS APPROACHED BY A FAMILY THAT WISHED
TO PURCHASE THE ABOVE PROPERTY. WE AGREED
TO A SELLING PRICE. I MADE HIM AWARE OF THE
MEETING IN NOVEMBER REGARDING TRI
RECYCLING. HE ATTENDED THE MEETING AND
SHORTLY AFf'ER THE MEETING INFORMED ME
THAT HE WOULD NOT GO AHEAD WITH THE SALE
OF THE PROPERTY. THE REASON HE GAVE WAS
THAT HE WAS CONCERNED ABOUT THE
POSSIBILITY OF POLLUTION TO THE LAND AND
THE
ON
and the purchase price upon request)
MY COMMENT AND CONCERN TO THE COUNCIL IS
WHO WILL BE RESPONSIBLE AND LIABLE FOR THE
DEVALUATION OF THE SURROUNDING
PROPERTIES. AS STATED ABOVE THERE IS A
PRECEDENT ALREADY SET. I WILL DEFINITELY
PURSUE COMPENSATION TO OFFSET THE
DEVALUATION OF MY PROPERTY
HAVE
purchaser
4.1 BEUEVE THAT THE PROPOSED WCATION IS
DIRECI'LY BENEATH THE FUGBT PATH LEADING
TO THE RUNWAY OF OUR REGIONAL AIRPORT.
THE AIRPORT, ORO MEDONTE, BARRIE AND
ORlLUA AND SIMCOE COUNTY ARE ALL LOOKING
TO A TTRACI' QUALITY PROGRESSIVE BUSINESSES
TO OUR AREA TO IMPROVE OUR QUALITY OF LIFE
AND PROVIDE MID TO HIGH PAYING JOBS. A WT
OF THE PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS WILL FLY IN TO
THE AIRPORT AND THE FIRST THING THAT THEY
WILL SEE BEFORE THEY EVEN LAND WILL BE THE
MESS CREATED FROM A WASTE RECYCLING
PLANT.
FIRST IMPRESSIONS DO LAST AND ARE
IMPORTANT. TO HAVE A RECYCLING PLANT
LOCATED DIRECTLY BELOW THE FLIGHT PATH TO
THE RUNWAY WILL DETER AND PREVENT MANY
COMPANIES FROM INVESTING IN THE AREA
SURROUNDING THE AIRPORT DESIGNATED FOR
INDUSTRY. TRI RECYCLING WILL NOT AJTKACI'
THE TYPE OF BUSINESSES THAT WILL HELP OUR
AREA TO FWURISH AND PROVIDE WELL PAYING
JOBS.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR AlTENTION TO THIS
MA ER
JA/cl /o'
Art /1/cC/\!)
,)0 - tJt~vJ/
~~ Cl7/o6
e<'-. ~-flV
Township of Oro-Medonte
148 Line 7 South
P.O. Box 100, Oro, Ontario LOL 2XO
Attn: Marilyn pennycook, Clerk
27/01/2006
, \ c:
.J
Re: Proposed zoning By-law Amendments involving the lands described as Concession 8, West
Part of Lot 19 (formerly within the Township of Oro). The subject lands are proposed to be
rezoned from Agricultural/Rural (NRU) Zone to the Economic Development (ED) Zone with an
exception to allow for a recycling establishment as a primary outdoor use. The rezoning affects
only blocks one and two.
Please be advised that we, object to the rezoning of the above noted piece of property to industrial zoning at this
time and the application for to further rezone part of the parcel to Economic Development Zone.
Please understand that this is not a case of NIMBY. We have done a lot of soul searching and have tossed the
pros and cons back and forth for the last month and change but in the end we were just unable to support the
rezoning.
Martine and I both understand the need for recycling and try to reduce, reuse, and especially recycle on a daily
basis.
Further Martine and I found Jim Graham and Stacey Graham of Try Recycling to be fairly, but not fully, open and
honest about their company and their intentions for the facility.
The Grahams seem not only proud of what their company does but also passionate about it and recycling in
general.
The Grahams seemed to truly want to work with the community in order to minimize the negative impacts on the
surrounding area but, alas, there seem to be just to many negative impacts involved with an open air recycling
facility and the composting of yard waste. I can only hope that whoever occupies that land one day will have the
same commitment to work with their neighbours In order to minimize any negative impacts.
We feel Simcoe County and Oro-Medonte would be proud to have a company like Try set up shop.
But, the land Try Recycling would like to setup shop on, while being within 120 meters of my property, sits directly
across from the Airport; and if the land is rezoned one day the land should be used to truly enhance and
maximize the value of the airport. An open air recycling facility, especially of this size will not accomplish that
goal.
I would encourage the Simcoe County and the Township of Oro-Medonte to find a more suitable location for Try
to setup a facility of this type.
I made an oral presentation at the public meeting of Nov. 28th, 2005.
The presentation contained many of Martine's and my concerns and objections to the above noted proposal.
had to cut the presentation short, as it was getting a little long.
I am attaching a partial copy of my presentation from the meeting up to where I got into the reports since after
that point I was talking more from point form notations I had made on the reports and therefore do not have a
good set of notes to go by.
I'm attaching a copy of MHBC's July 6, 2005 Analysis and MHBC's September 20,2005 Analysis with my
notations. The notations are in a smaller typeface under the areas I was commenting on.
I have not included the Traffic or Functional Servicing and Preliminary Stromwater Management reports as
I have coved off most of the problems with them in the notations on the other reports.
I am also including a copy of The Agricultural Advisory Team's Advice to the Government of Ontario it seems to
be relevant to my agricultural objections and concerns.
. Page 2
.
Partial text from presentation to council 2005/11/28
,
-j
Firstly I would like to thank Jim and Stacey Graham of Try Recycle for talking the time
to meet with Martine and myselflast Thursday and again for meeting with other members
of the community last Saturday.
I also would like to thank Councillor Crawford for allowing me to accompany him on a
tour of Try Recycling's London facility. I wish that everyone could have toured Try's
facility so that everyone would have a better idea of what you're deciding on.
I have been busy over the last several days trying to decide weather to support or oppose
the proposed changes and have had to quickly try to digest a sizeable amount of
information and concerns. I obviously have concerns, which direetly affect me, but I also
have concerns regarding the impact on not just my neighbours but, also on the Township
ofOro, its people, and reputation.
I have concerns regarding possible damage and contamination to not just my property
and the immediate surrounding properties but also to those further away which could be
affected by contaminated run off, noise, airborne contamination e.g. heavy metals, dirt
and dust, litter etc.
I have a farmer who raises beef organically on my land and if plastic particles or any
other number of possible contaminations drift on to my land, it's ruined for organic
farming. Who, and it better not be me, is going to pay to clean up my land. If that should
happen Mr. McBride cannot replace this acreage with any other in Oro. Even if my land
is cleaned up it will still take 4 years to get recertified.
The economic impact on Doug would be catastrophic; who's going to help him.
That brings me to the visit that I had to Try Recycling facility in London. I admit it was
interesting and Try is obviously proud and passionate about recycling but it also
highlighted a nwnber of concerns. One of the biggest concerns is the Smell caused by
the yard waste compo sting. I can tell you it would travel all the way down to the 6th up to
the 9th and over to the 15th 16th side road and all the way across highway II. The
prevailing winds would carry the smell into the Oro Camp Ground. Oro Camp Ground
would probably be put out of business; who wants to camp at a smelly Camp Ground.
Who is going to help them? It would also travel into Burls Creek. Mr Heaney might just
be a wee upset if that were to happen.
Its all very good to say we'll shut it down but how do you turn off a compost pile you just
do not throw a switch.
What do you think some VIP, maybe Shania Twain would say if they're getting off or
boarding a flight at the airport, and the smell was drifting or hanging over the airport.
"God where's that awful smell coming from; this place stinks."
We are in the process of opening a, hopefully, high end boarding kenneL Do you think
anyone who says it stinks is going to leave his or her dog with us?
Partial text from presentation to council 2005111/28
\()
I am also concerned about particulate matter blowing off the piles and into the air. I have
a pile of sand at my place and the wind just picks it up and carries it high and far. How
are you going to prevent dry wall particles from being picked up and carried? When
Councillor Crawford and I were on our tour of Try the wind was grabbing hold of some
of the dirt and dust coming off one of their conveyers and you could see the material
being carried thru the air and watch the slain on the snow get longer and longer, and
browner and browner. Heck the stuff was into my eycs, nose, and mouth. What if you
were to get a strong updraft through the facility while a plane was landing. I am not sure
what the grit and dust might do to an aircraft.
I think further area study needs to be done in this arca regarding the effect on the airport
and the aircraft landing or taking off. As stated earlier I fell Try is proud and passionate
about recycling and they truly seem to be above board and want to work with the
community; but this is a business and businesses want to make money by maximizing
income and minimizing costs, short cuts take place.
I asked Jim Graham if they had considered any other possible locations and if they had
what happened were they turned down? I rcally didn't get an answer yes or no and this is
why I asked if they had. Had they for example considered a gravel pit like they use in
London. On Saturday, we were basically told gravel pits are not really suitable since they
are to returned to what they were, usually, agricultural rural land and that's what people
expect them to be returned to.
So let me ask Jim again a little differentIy- did you or any agent acting on behalf of Try
recycling look at any other locations in Simcoe County. If so why did they not work out
After Jim answered. f asked Him. Let me put it a little differently. I then proceeded to ask
him about their attempted deal with Eisses Bros. Excavating which was proceeding well
until Eisses went to London to see Try's operation there. When Try turned the compost
pile the smell.from it killed the deal.
During Saturdays meeting between Jim and Stacy and some of their potential neighbours,
inculding Deputy Mayor Hughes and Councillor Crawford I asked what the economic
benefit would be for Oro-Medonte. I really didn't get the answer I expected. The only
real one was the tax revenue. I inquired about the amount (taxes) and tax rate- no was
able to provide with that info.
I expected facts and figures. I expected an Economic Impact study. Which would show
the expected economic gain or loss if this land was rezoned and occupied by Try
Recycling. I expected projections on the tax Try would pay vs the reduction in taxes
received from the surrounding property owners when their properties decreased in value
since most people would properly not want to buy a property near a facility like this. I
also asked what the percentage decrease would most likely be, no answer again. I
expected to hear what other types of businesses might be attracted if Try is allowed to
occupy the land, again no answer. I feel more study is required in this area- After all if
Partial text from presentation to council 2005/11128
\
,
.
thcre is no real true economic gain for Oro-Medonte what's the point of having a bunch
of upset neighbours.
Example: What is Oro-Medonte going to have to spend picking up litter along the 7th
from Highway 11 to, God knows where, the 15th 16th .Up and down the 15th 16tht as stuff
blows out of trailers or truck beds driven by the Moms and Pops which will supposedly
make up 80% of the Try's business here.
You've all seen the trash on the 7th overpass and down along the ramp to highway 11
from the 7'h. 1 could go on and on. But I am just going to put it like this you'll have:
Land Pollution: plastic, dirt, dust, contamination, organic farmland ruined, not in keeping
with the rural agriculture flavour of Oro.
Air Pollution: smell, particulate matter.
Water: possible heavy metal contamination (surfacc and ground). The earth likes to suck
water down. We are part of the watershed for Lake Simcoe; water loss to Lake Simcoe
due to evaporation if water has to be held on site.
Noise Pollution: backup beepers, conveyors, crushers, Heavy Trucks air brakes this is
already a problem with the gravel truckers on the overpass.
More study is required prior to rezoning. Example: how far does the smell actually travel
now how far do dirt, dust, and particulate matter travel and what contaminants are in it?
How far will the noise travel when some, part, or all the machinery is operating? A new
study was released "Noise Kills"
A full Environment Impact Study should be completed before the land is rezoned. I
would like to ask Jim (Graham) how much material is expect to be processed on a daily
basis. How much in and how much out - In X amount out of Y amount 300 tonnes
generates a full EA process. How much is going to be stored on site? I was talking to the
field officer of the Ministry of the Environment for the London area and he said it's funny
how many of these places operate at just under the 300 limit.
Lets get it right. After all it is easier to say NO now if the effects are negative than trying
to shut it down later Example: Halton, Vaughn, and Scarborough.
I feel we are putting the cart before the horse. Further study needs to be done before
recognizing takes place regardless of the official plan designation. The official plan may
be flawed.
I picked up three reports from the township on last Wednesday afternoon. They're were
fun to read
1" Povntz Street
B~mi~, Ontario L4M 3N6
T: (705) 728.0045
F: (705) 728.2010
w\vw.mhbcplan.com
;VIA, FCIP, RPP
8E5, .1\KIP, RPP
BES, 1\.lCIP, RPP
?vIA MCIP, RPP
LIES, jl,IClP, HPP
HES
HES, ;\KlP' RPP
City, Town and Rural Planning
I'v1unicipal Plans and Studies
Lmd Development
Urban Design!
Community Planning
Landscape Architedurc
Natural Resource
and Aggregate Planning
Expert Evidence
and l\1ediation
Project l\lanagement
PLANNING ANALYSIS FOR REZONING
APPLICATION BY:
TRY RECYCLING INC.
225 Line 7 North
Township of Oro-Medonte
July 6, 2005
File No: Y599 A
\
1.0 Introduction
The following Planning Analysis is written in support of an application to amend the
Township of Oro-Medonte Zoning By-law 97-95, as amended, for the parcel of land legally
described as West Half of Lot 19, Concession 8 (formerly Oro), Township of Oro-Medonte,
County of Simcoe. The application is being submitted on behalf of TRY Recycling (Barrie)
Inc. who has an offer to purchase these lands to permit the use of the property for a
recycling establishment An application for consent to create a 17.4 ha (43 acre) parcel of
land for the proposed recycling establishment has also been submitted to the Township.
2.0 Proposal
The proposal before the Township of Oro-Medonte is a rezoning from the Agricultural/Rural
(A1RU) Zone to a Site Specific Economic Development (ED*) Zone to permit the
development of a recycling establishment for construction, demolition, and industrial
materials. A Site Specific Economic Development Zone (ED*) is required, notwithstanding
the fact that a recycling establishment is permitted in an Economic Development zone, as
the definition for "Recycling Establishment" in the Township's Zoning By-law 97-95, as
amended, states that a Recycling Establishment means "premises in which used materials
are separated and/or processed prior to shipment to other users who will use those materials
to manufacture new or recycled products". The only premises proposed by this application
are the scale house building and therefore the recycling establishment proposed by TRY
Recycling (Barrie) Inc. does not satisfy the definition contained in By-law 97-95. A Consent
Application that would create a new parcel of land that is I-shaped with a lot frontage of 40
metres on Line 7 North, a depth of approximately 686 metres, and a total area of
approximately 17.4 ha (43 acres) has also been submitted to the Township's Committee of
Adjustment The area at the front on the proposed lot will contain a single driveway access to
the recycling establishment proposed with a scale house building and the outdoor recycling
area which will be located on the 40 acres at the back of the parcel. The lot configuration
proposed by this application allows for the driveway access to a site that does not require
visibility from the municipal road and protects the maximum amount of frontage on Line 7
North for other future industrial uses.
How do you keep out hatardous materia!? Certain older building materials contain hazardous materials,
Just what do think will come
A building would contain a lot at problems including the containment of hazardous dust dirt. and particulate matter
including the smeil from the feaf composting by using a negative pressure ventilation system and a biomass filter bed
3.0 Site and Surrounding Uses
The lands are legally described as Concession 8, West Part of Lot 19 (formerly Oro),
Township of Oro-Medonte. The subject property is a total of 43.7 ha (108 acres) of lot area,
has a lot frontage of 636 metres and a lot depth of 686 metres. The subject lands are located
on Line 7 North, just north of Highway 11. The lands subject to this application currently
contain an existing dwelling and outbuildings that are not located on the lands to be rezoned.
The topography of the site features a relatively flat landscape. There is vegetation in the south
east corner of the parcel that is intended to remain with the retained lands. There are also
existing tree rows between the neighbouring properties to the east, south, and north.
\ ~"\.\ Ii
t\.J'L-v-
MI-IBC Planning Limited 13 Poyntz Street Barrie ON L4M 3N6 P: (705) 728-0045 F: (705) 728-2010
TRY Recycling (Barrie) Inc. Rezoning Analysis (bottom of Page 1)
Lands to the south of the subject lands are wooded and contain an existing dwelling. The Lake
Simcoe Region Airport is located to the west of the subject lands. An environmental
protection/wooded area is located to the north and to the east of the site there is a mixture of
wooded and cropped lands.
4.0 offi cial pl an and zDni no By-law
The subject property is governed by the policies of the Official Plans (OP) of the County
of Simcoe and the Township of Oro-Medonte. This report shall discuss each of the OP's
as well as the Township of Oro-Medonte Zoning By-law as it relates to the approval
being sought b this proposal.
4.1 County of simcoe official plan
The lands subject to the rezoning are designated "Rural and Agricultural" in the County
of Simcoe Official Plan (OP). The Greenlands designation is wholly contained within the
lands that are not the subject of the rezoning and development proposal for the recycling
establishment will not conflict with the Greenlands policies of the County Plan.
Consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (PPS), one of the goals of the County
OP is to promote economic sustainability in Simcoe County by providing employment
and business opportunities. The County Plan seeks to develop communities with
diversified economic functions and opportunities and to enable and manage resource
based development as the key to economic development throughout the County. The
Plan recognizes the need to enable and encourage development of a wider range of
business and employment opportunities to meet the needs of the growing population.
The proposed recycling establishment, which includes recycling of construction
materials, would be consistent with the wider range of business opportunities not
currently provided in this vicinity of the County and would therefore achieve the goals of
the County Plan.
Will we only get material from this vicinity? Not likely.
Not with the smell coming off 01 the compost pile,
What percentage of profits does the composting generate for Try,
Composting is already done at the dump. why move it here?
Side note: if we are now composting at the dump and are giving the composted material away free or at a minimal charge
to those who want it I undersland that this is a very high demand product. then why are we providing resalable material to
a private firm?
Why now make people add profit to a private firm for something they can now obtain lor free or at a nominal cost?
Why is the dump not providing a similar service like Try's this is obviously a money-maker and could possibly help to offsel
Ihe cosl 01 garbage collection and the running of tile dump,
The proposed rezoning application would encourage a diversified business opportunity
and provide a potential catalyst for additional economic development in the vicinity of the
Lake Simcoe Region Airport and the Oro Centre Industrial/Commercial lands. This
rezoning application would therefore conform with the intent of the County Plan.
Section 3.3.16 of the General Development Policies indicates that "where appropriate,
the County shall require development applicants to undertake and implement a traffic
study to the satisfaction of the appropriate road authorities". This policy further indicates
that they are generally required where County Road improvements may be necessary
based on proposed, existing, and future traffic volumes. The proposed recycling
establishment will be located on a municipal road that is a designated haul route for
truck traffic and was designed for large volumes of traffic and therefore this policy would
not be applicable to the proposed rezoning application. However, a traffic study is
currently underway by the applicant as requested by the Township to confirm the
existing road conditions are appropriate for the recycling establishment.
MHBC Planning Limited 13 Poyntz Street Barrie ON L4M 3N6 P: (705) 728-0045 F: (705) 728-2010 2
TRY Recycling (Barrie) Inc. Rezoning Analysis (bottom of Page 2)
Section 3.6 contains the specific policies related to lands designated Rural and
Agricultural and states that "in rural areas (this application) uses permitted include rural
business parks among other locations. Single industrial uses are generally not permitted
outside of settlements, business parks, or Special Development Area designations.
Consideration of proposals will require a local official plan amendment and must meet
one of the following criteria:
. the use is for the primary processing of land related resources found on the site
or in close proximity to the site;
. the use is incompatible in the proximity of other industrial uses;
. the use has large land requirements that cannot be satisfied in settlements,
business parks, or Special Development Area designations either through
existing infill opportunities or expansion."
The TRY Recycling (Barrie) Inc. proposal meets criteria three which in effect states that
the proposed use requires large land area and outdoor storage requirements that cannot
be satisfied in the existing industrial parks within Oro-Medonte. A local Official Plan
Amendment is not however required in order to conform to this policy as the Township
adopted an Official Plan Amendment that re-designated these lands to Industrial
recognizing that additional lands in the vicinity of the Lake Simcoe Region Airport were
required for industrial development. The County, as the approval authority, adopted the
amendment and therefore supported that this re-designation satisfied their policies
outlined above. The County adoption of the Industrial designation on the subject lands
also confirms that there is no conflict between the policies of the County Plan and the
local Plan as required by Section 4.11.3.
Can be stored indoors. just like the MTO salt domes.
Why not a better quality industry?
The policy also requires various development standards to be met. These standards and
the proposal's compliance to them are as follows:
. the proposed use generates limited truck traffic in relation to the existing haul
route use of Line 7 North;
. the proposed use does not require significant water or sewage services;
. the proposed use will have a limited number of employees; and
. the proposed use is not located in the vicinity of incompatible surrounding land
uses
What is limited.. .employees, trucks.
Incompatible with organic farmland
On this basis the proposed use for a recycling establishment on the subject lands would
conform with the policies of Section 3.6.7.
The subject lands were not included in the Oro Centre Special Policy Area at the local
level but are adjacent to the study area lands. The Lake Simcoe Region Airport is also
adjacent to the subject lands and the airport is recognized in the County OP as a Special
Development Area. The County recognizes that these areas should be comprehensively
planned in order to maximize their economic benefits and long term vitality while
ensuring that development patterns and designs recognize and protect environmental
features and functions.
Section 4 of the County OP lists a series of Policy Statements that affect land use
approvals. A review of the relevant sections, specifically Section 4.3, has been
completed and the application has been deemed to conform as the scale and layout of
MHBC Planning Limited 13 Poyntz Street Barrie ON L4M 3N6 P: (705) 728-0045 F: (705) 728-2010 3
TRY Recycling (Barrie) Inc. Rezoning Analysis (bottom of Page 3)
the development proposal has been designed to maintain the character of the existing
area and to minimize the removal of natural vegetation within the site.
On the basis of the analysis provided above, this rezoning application would conform to
the intent and specific policies of the County Official Plan.
4.2 Township of Oro-Medonte Official Plan
The lands proposed to be rezoned for the recycling establishment are designated
"Industrial" in the Township's Official Plan. The balance of the lands are designated
"Industrial" and "Environmental Protection Two Overlay" in the Township's Official Plan.
What happed to previOUS EP areas? (not on air photo) see zoning maps
The Vision of the Plan encourages additional economic activity by designating lands in
the vicinity of the Lake Simcoe Region Airport for industrial/commercial purposes. Pillar
# 5 of the Official Plan Principles also encourages development that results in an
\
increase in economic activity provided that it does not have a negative impact on the
natural environment, natural resources, or the rural character. The proposed use will not
only encourage additional economic activity not currently provided in the municipality;
but will also assist in maintaining the rural character of the Township through the
proposed configuration of the parcel.
W;JJ have a negative impact on the natural environment (organic).
How do you qualify and quantify ttiis statement ".. .encourage additional. ,.
Section D7.5.2 contains the special development policy for the West Half of Lot 19,
Concession VIII (Oro) which would include the lands subject to this rezoning application.
These policies state that prior to the consideration of a plan of subdivision application a
Comprehensive Development Plan (CDP) shall be completed that deals with such issues
as: servicing (water and sewage), traffic, storm water management, and the form, scale,
and density of development. As this application is not proceeding by plan of subdivision
the CDP requirements would not be applicable. The intent of this policy however, is to
ensure that the entire land holding is assessed comprehensively during the development
process and not reviewed on a site by site basis for each development proposal. The
recycling proposal is more land intensive than most uses that were anticipated for this
property; however the remaining 65 acres continues to be viable for a comprehensive
industrial development. Notwithstanding this opinion, these issues are all appropriate for
the consideration of the proposed rezoning and development and are discussed below in
regard to how these issues are being addressed and the specific applications that have
been submitted to the Township to satisfy these requirements.
Is a subdivision and needs a COP
Servicinq
The recycling establishment will require minimal water and sewage services for
employee facilities and not for any specific processing related to this use on the site. The
means of servicing the proposed use would be most appropriately completed through
individual services based on the nature of the use. Given the limited amount of water and
sewage proposed by this application no other form of servicing would be considered
appropriate or feasible. Based on the large land area proposed by this rezoning
application, these requirements can be accommodated within the site.
The establishment of the intended use on this portion of the lands does not preclude the
balance of the lands (approximately 65 acres) from being developed with communal
services, if required, in the future based on land usage requirements.
Will require water for not just for employs facilties Composting. Dust controt etc.
MHBC Planning Limited 13 Poyntz Street Barrie ON L4M 3N6 P: (705) 728-0045 F: (705) 728-20 I 0 4
TRY Recycling (Barrie) Inc. Rezoning Analysis (bottom of Page 4)
Traffic
A traffic analysis is currently being completed for submission to the Township as part of
the rezoning process and will review the proposed development and assess the additional
\
i
,
truck traffic proposed based on the existing haul route and turning patterns into the
proposed recycling establishment.
Sections H1.2.4 and H1.5 specifically detail policies related to the consideration of traffic
impact for any proposed industrial use and also specifically the consideration of a
proposed use in relation to the access to the gravel haul route (Line 7 North) and will be
addressed through the traffic analysis being completed.
Scale, Form, Density of Development
The proposed land use requires a large land area for the outdoor storage of materials and
the appropriate landscaping. The layout of the consent submitted to the Township's
Committee of Adjustment would contain a 40 metre wide driveway access to the site with
the balance of the lands being utilized for the scale house, conveyors, and outdoor
storage and processing on the back 40 acres. This proposal maintains the frontage of the
subject lands for other future industrial development as contemplated by the Industrial
designation in the Official Plan. The conveyed lands also ensure that the visibility of the
proposed use from the municipal road is minimized as visibility is not required for the
viability of this business. The balance of the lands not being rezoned are designed in such
a nature to ensure that an appropriate development design can be completed with an
appropriate road structure based on the configuration of the lands.
stormwater Quality and Quantity
Section G2.2 states that all major industrial development proposals shall be supported by
a Storm Water Management (SWM) report. The policy does not indicate the timing for this
work to be completed and it is our opinion that this detailed work is more appropriately
completed during the Site Plan process required by the Township.
This should be done before it's rezoned.
Official Plan Conclusion
The proposed rezoning application for a recycling establishment has a large land area
requirement that cannot be satisfied on designated Industrial lands in the Municipality, the
proposed use will generate limited additional traffic on the existing haul route, the
proposed use can be appropriately serviced by individual services and will not preclude
consideration of communal services on the balance of the lands, and the proposed
location for this use given the surrounding land uses would be appropriate.
Based on the above, this rezoning application is deemed to generally conform to the intent
and policies of the Township's Official Plan.
4.3 Township of Oro-Medonte ZoninQ By-law 97-95
The subject lands are currently zoned Agricultural/Rural (A1RU) Zone in the Township's
Zoning By-law NO.97-95, as amended.
MHBC Planning Limited 13 Poyntz Street Barrie ON L4M 3N6 P: (705) 728-0045 F: (705) 728-20 I 0 5
TRY Recycling (Barrie) Inc. Rezoning Analysis (bottom of Page 5)
This Zoning By-law Amendment application proposes to re-zone the subject lands from
\CJ
,
the Agricultural/Rural (A/RU) Zone to a Site Specific Economic Development (ED*)
Zone. This zoning by-law amendment would permit the use of the subject lands for a
recycling establishment. The site specific nature of the amendment is to remove the
requirement for premises as the component of the recycling establishment.
The Economic Development zone requires a minimum lot frontage of 40 metres and a
minimum lot area of 0.4 ha (0.98 acres). The consent application proposes a lot
frontage of 40 metres and a lot area of 17.4 ha (43 acres) and would therefore comply
with the provisions of the Economic Development (ED) zone. The maximum height for
buildings within the Economic Development zone is 12.0 metres. This application
proposes that all buildings including conveyors will comply with this maximum height
requirement thus ensuring that no compatibility issues arise with the existing flight path
for the Lake Simcoe Region Airport.
The site specific nature of the zoning by-law amendment relates to the definition of
recycling establishment which indicates "premises in which used materials are separated
and/or processed prior to shipment to other users who will use those materials to
manufacture new or recycled products". The applicant's intent is such a use, however
the only "premises" required are the scale house building, the remainder of the
processing will not be located within premises and therefore requires an amendment to
the current definition contained in the Township's Zoning By-law 97-95 and permitted in
the Economic Development (ED) Zone. The proposed recycling establishment will
comply with all other provisions of the ED Zone.
Bring it inside, keeps down dust, dirt, particulate maller, noise, vibration, and the visual pollution. Also beller to contain any
hazardous runoff.
In accordance with the analysis provided above and adoption of the rezoning, the
proposed use will comply with the provisions with all other of the Township's Zoning By-
law.
5.0 Provincial Policv Statement
The Provincial Policy Statement was issued under Section 3 of the Planning Act and it is
intended to provide policy direction for land use matters which are of Provincial Interest.
Planning Authorities are to be consistent with the Policy Statement when exercising any
authority. A review of the Provincial Policy Statement has been undertaken with respect
to the application for rezoning to permit the recycling establishment on this Industrial
designated property and because the PPS encourages the promotion of employment
areas with a mix and range of employment to meet the long term needs of the Township,
and to provide opportunities for a diversified economic base to support a wide range of
economic activities, and because this proposal would permit an increase to the industrial
base in the Township, it has been determined that the proposal meets the intention of
the Policy Statement.
6,0 Conclusion
It is our opinion that the proposal conforms to the County of Simcoe Official Plan,
Township of Oro-Medonte Official Plan, and the Provincial Policy Statement. While a
Site Specific Zoning By-law is needed to permit the specific form of recycling
establishment proposed by TRY Recycling (Barrie) Inc., the property can be zoned
effectively.
MHBC Planning Limited 13 Poyntz Street Barrie ON L4M 3N6 P: (705) 728-0045 F: (705) 728-2010 6
TRY Recycling (Barrie) Inc. Rezoning Analysis (bottom of Page 6)
On the basis of the analysis detailed in this report, It is our opinion that the approval of
this rezoning application represents good planning.
Respectfully Submitted, MHBC Planning Limited
Andria Leigh, MCIP, RPP Senior Planner
cc. TRY Recycling (Barrie) Inc. - Peter Hill
3 Poynt7 Street
arrie, Ontario lAM 3N6
(70S) 728.0045
: [705) 728.2010
w\v.mhbcplan.com
lA, FClP, RPP
,[$, 1\1ClP, RPP
;E5, l'vIClP, RPP
ilA, 1\1CIP, RPP
:E5, 1vIClP, gpp
:E$
;[$, MCIP, RPP
:ity, Town and Rural Planning
,lunicipal plans and Studies
~and Development
Jrban Design I
,~ommul1ity Planning
~andscape Architecture
'.Jatural Resource
lnd Aggregate Planning
~xpert Evidence
l1ld l\'kdiation
Yroiect Ivlanagement
\Dk-
PLANNING ANALYSIS
FOR PLAN OF SUBDIVISION APPLICATION
TRY RECYCLING INC. and 1531448
ONTARIO INC.
225 Line 7 North
Township of Oro-Medonte
September 20,2005
File No: Y599 A
PLANNING ANALYSIS
TRY RECYCLING INC. AND 1531448 ONTARIO INC.
Plan of Subdivision
Township of Oro-Medonte
September 2005
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The following Planning Analysis is written in support of an application for an
industrial plan of subdivision to be located on the West Part of Lot 19, Concession 8
(in the former Township of Oro), now Township of Oro-Medonte, County of Simcoe.
The application is being submitted by TRY Recycling Inc. who has an offer to
purchase 17.4 ha of the land for a recycling establishment and by 1531448 Ontario
Inc. who will retain ownership of the balance of the lands for future industrial use.
An application for rezoning for the 17.4 ha (43 acre) parcel of land for the proposed
recycling establishment was previously submitted to the Township.
2.0 PROPOSAL
The plan of subdivision proposes to divide the site into 3 parcels of land two of which
will be conveyed to TRY Recycling Inc. for their driveway access (1.21 ha site) and
their recycling establishment (16.1 ha site) and one to be conveyed to 1531448
Ontario Inc. for future industrial usage (26.3 ha site), not determined at the time of
submission of this application. The two blocks to be conveyed to TRY Recycling Inc.
are also the subject of an application for rezoning to amend the definition contained
in the Township's Zoning By-law 97-95, as amended for "Recycling Establishment".
The two lots will have frontage and direct access to Line 7 North, which is a
municipally maintained road and also an aggregate haul route. Individual entrances
to each of the two parcels Line 7 North are proposed at this time, one of which is
currently the entrance to the southerly parcel that is intended to be maintained until
future industrial uses are determined.
A reduction of the proposed draft plan prepared by MHBC Planning is attached to this
report. A formal draft plan drawing prepared by an Ontario Land Surveyor will be
submitted in the near future.
MHBC Planning
Try Recycling Inc & 1531448 Ontario Inc. (bottom of page 1)
Township ofOro-Medonte
3.0 SITE AND SURROUNDING USES
3.1 Site Location and Configuration
The site is located centrally within the Township of Oro-Medonte, in the County of
Simcoe. The lands are legally described as Concession 8, West Part of Lot 19
(formerly Oro), Township of Oro-Medonte. The subject property is a total of 43.7 ha
(108 acres) of lot area, has a lot frontage of 636 metres and a lot depth of
approximately 686 metres. The subject lands are located on Line 7 North, just north
of Highway 11. The lands subject to this application currently contain an existing
dwelling and outbuildings that will continue to be located on the 26.3 ha future
industrial site.
The topography of the site features a relatively flat landscape with the low potion of
the site being located in the south east corner which the location of the existing
stand of vegetation and is intended to remain on the 26.3 ha future industrial site.
There are also existing tree rows between the neighbouring properties to the east,
south, and north and between the cropped fields on the site.
Minimal tree rows in some places"
Lands to the south of the subject lands are wooded and contain an existing dwelling.
The Lake Simcoe Regional Airport is located to the west of the subject lands. To the
east of the site there is a mixture of wooded and cropped lands and an
environmental protection/wooded area is located to the north that is a 36 ha parcel
that is also designated Industrial and subject to the same Special Development Policy
contained in the Township's Official Plan (Section D7.5.2) as the lands subject to this
proposed plan of subdivision application. Concemed about particulale matter and other material
blowing inlo the EP area especially in the summer when we gel some heavy South to North winds.
4.0 OFFICIAL PLAN
The site is subject to the policies of the Official Plan (OP) of the County of Simcoe as
well as the OP policies of the Township of Oro-Medonte. These policies are discussed
herein as it relates to this proposal.
4.1 County of Simcoe Official Plan
The lands subject to the plan of subdivision application are designated "Rural and
Agricultural" and "Greenland" in the County of Simcoe Official Plan (OP). The
Greenland designation applies to a portion of the lands contained within the 26.3 ha
parcel intended for future industrial use. At the time of further development,
additional review of the site would be appropriate to assess potential impacts of
specific development on the Greenland designated lands. The proposed recycling
establishment that is also the subject of a rezoning application is solely designated
"Rural and Agricultural" in the County Plan. The rest of the iand should be discussed atthis time
since an open air recycling facility, especialiy, if composting is included wiJI have a large, mostly, negative impact on
any further development on the remaining land.
MHBC Planning
Try Recycling Inc & I 531448 Ontario Inc. (bottom of page 2)
Township ofOro-Medonte
\ /)1\
, -2J~
Consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (PPS), one of the goals of the
County OP is to promote economic sustainability in Simcoe County by providing
employment and business opportunities. The County Plan seeks to develop
communities with diversified economic functions and opportunities and to enable
and manage resource based development as the key to economic development
throughout the County. The Plan recognizes the need to enable and encourage
development of a wider range of business and employment opportunities to meet
the needs of the growing population. The proposed industrial plan of subdivision
that would allow the recycling establishment would be consistent with the wider
range of business opportunities not currently provided in this vicinity of the
County and would therefore achieve the goals of the County Plan. Bulatwhatcostto
existing businesses i.e. Oro Camp Ground, Burfs Creek, Doug McBride's Organic Fanning, the Airport. Smell,
Conlaminated Dust & Dirt and runoff, Noise, Liller, Visual pollution
The proposed plan of subdivision application for industrial uses would encourage
a diversified business opportunity and provide a potential catalyst for additional
economic development in the vicinity of the Lake Simcoe Regional Airport and
the Oro Centre Industrial/Commercial lands. Open air recycling would properly hurt more than help.
The composting I saw in London created a hell of a smell even in the winter and it drifts far and wide. You don't ship
compost and recycled material by air.
4.1.1 Subdivision and Development Policies
The County OP identifies policies for general development and development of
subdivisions. These policies discuss several issues related to subdivision
development including: roads, environmental, agricultural, and engineering. All of
the criteria for development have been reviewed in the context of this plan of
subdivision proposal and have been found not to be applicable to the site, or are
discussed herein. 1) Environmental has not been addressed a full EIS should be perfom1ed in order to address
what air, soil, surface and groundwater pollution miglll occur due 10 the Iype of material being recycled. 2) Agricullure
has not been addressed see Agricultural Advisory advice to Ihe Govemment of Ontario. 3) Engineering is lacking at
Ihls time. 4) Roads same as engineering...sludy seems Incorrect where are the large (Heavy) Imcks. Enough of them
travel down that road.
As part of the County criteria (Section 3.3.15) for all plans of subdivision or the
creation of more than five lots by consent, a Stormwater Management Report is
being prepared for the site and is more fully discussed in Section 4.2.1.3 of this
Report.
Section 3.3.16 of the General Development Policies indicates that "where
appropriate, the County shall require development applicants to undertake and
implement a traffic study to the satisfaction of the appropriate road authorities".
This policy further indicates that they are generally required where County Road
improvements may be necessary based on proposed, existing, and future traffic
volumes. The proposed plan of subdivision will be located on a municipal road (Line
7 North) that is a designated haul route for truck traffic and was designed for large
volumes of traffic. Notwithstanding that this policy would not be applicable to the
proposed plan of subdivision application, a Traffic and Access Review Report is being
completed to satisfy the requirements of the Township's
Official Plan. The traffic study seems to be fiawed see above. Simcoe County's OP (3.3.16 & Appendix 5)
requires a 20yr plan. Cole Engineering only seems to project out 5yrs. Seems to have some other flaws. How was the
Topographical information obtained for the FSR and Preliminary SMR Report since fill seems to have been applied to
some areas has any of the land be tiled?
MHBC Planning
Try Recycling Inc & I 53I448 Ontario Inc. (bottom of page 3)
Township ofOro-Medonte
-
4.1.2 Rural & Aaricultural Policies
The County OP outlines in Section 3.6, policies concerning development in the Rural
and Agricultural areas. These have been reviewed in the context of the development
of the proposed industrial plan of subdivision. These policies state that "in rural areas
(subject lands are however designated Industrial at local level) uses permitted
include rural business parks amongst other uses. The proposed plan of subdivision is
a 2 lot industrial plan of subdivision with the potential for further development of the
26.3 ha site in the future as more specific users of the site are determined.
The Try Recycling Inc. parcel (17.4 ha) is intended to be developed as a whole for
industrial purposes at this time and therefore a review of permissions for single
industrial uses was also completed.
Single industrial uses are generally not permitted outside of settlements, business
parks, or Special Development Area designations. Consideration of proposals will
require a local official plan amendment and must meet one of the following criteria'
3.6.7. MHBC Planning states: "Single induslriat uses are generally not permitted outside of settlements, business parks.
or Speciat Oevetopment Area designations. Consideration of proposals witt require a local officiat plan amendmenl and
must meet one of the following criteria"
The aclual sentence in Simcoe County's OP says "must meellhe following criteria" not one as stated by MHBC
Planning. Therefore this proposal does not met all (which is implied) the following criteria
. the use is for the primary processing of land related resources found on the
site or in close proximity to the site;
. the use is incompatible in the proximity of other industrial uses;
. the use has large land requirements that cannot be satisfied in settlements,
business parks, or Special Development Area designations either through
existing infill opportunities or expansion."
The TRY Recycling Inc. proposal meets criteria three which in effect states that the
proposed use requires a large land area and outdoor storage requirement that
cannot be satisfied in the existing industrial parks within Oro-Medonte. A local Official
Plan Amendment is not however required in order to conform to this policy as the
Township adopted an Official Plan Amendment that re-designated these lands to
Industrial recognizing that additional lands in the vicinity of the Lake Simcoe
Regional Airport were required for industrial development. The County, as the
approval authority, adopted the amendment and therefore supported that this re-
designation satisfied their policies outlined above. The County adoption of the
Industrial designation on the subject lands also confirms that there is no conflict
between the policies of the County Plan and the local Plan as required by Section
4.11.3.
It effecls organic fanning and has already scared off a potential purchaser of the farm next door. This seems to conflict
with Simcoe County's OP sections 3.6.1, 3.6.2. Has section 3.6.5 of/he Simcoe County's OP been satisfied? In light of
Ihe Agricultural Advisory advice to the Govemment of Onlario it might be prudent to put a hold on development et this
time especially with the Greenbelt now in place" The ~Ajave is coming.
Try's devetopment is not in keeping wilh section 3.9. If anything it will hurt the airport not maximize its economic
benefits. 3.9.1 not a major economic generator tow wage jobs and tow job density tess than 1 per acre. 3.9.3 not
sensitive to the character of the afea on the backside of the property 3.9.5 seems to be in conflict.
-
MHBC Planning
Try Recycling Inc & 1531448 Ontario Inc. (bottom of page 4)
Township ofOro-Medonte
\
This policy continues on to require certain development standards to be met.
These standards and Try Recycling Inc.'s compliance to them are as follows:
. the proposed use generates limited truck traffic in relation to the existing haul
route use of Line 7 North;
. the proposed use does not require significant water or sewage services;
. the proposed use will have a limited number of employees; and
. the proposed use is not located in the vicinity of incompatible surrounding
land uses
What is Try's estimale of truck traffic as the traffic study seems to be flawed. What does "limited" mean
It's incompatible with the airport and the iand uses on Ihe backside of the property as well 8S other businesses in its
fallout zone.
The subject lands were not included in the Oro Centre Special Policy Area at the
local level but are adjacent to the study area lands. The lands were designated
Industrial to recognize their unique location adjacent to the Lake Simcoe Regional
Airport which is recognized in the County OP as a Special Development Area. The
County recognizes that these areas should be comprehensively planned in order to
maximize their economic benefits and long term vitality while ensuring that
development patterns and designs recognize and protect environmental features and
functions. The proposed plan of subdivision would ensure that comprehensive
development is being completed adjacent to the Special Development Area.
Maximize their economic benefits. How?
4.1.3 General Development Policies
Section 4.3 of the County OP outlines general development policies and
guidelines. Each of these policies is discussed as follows (criteria are
paraphrased) :
Minimize the removal of natural vegetation
. The vegetation on the site consists of a number of tree rows between the
cropped fields and a stand of vegetation in the south east corner of the site.
As indicated previously in this report, the vegetation in the south east corner
is located on lands for future industrial development and the potential impact
of specific development and the ability to minimize tree removal is more
appropriately addressed at that time. The site proposed for the Try Recycling
facility proposes to enhance the vegetation on the site with the addition of a
landscape buffer along the south westerly boundary of the site.
Why not on all sides.
Protect and maintain scenic resources
. There are no scenic resources on site.
MHBC Planning
Try Recycling Inc & 1531448 Ontario Inc. (bottom of page 5)
Township ofOro-Medonte
The architecture, scale of development and development pattern be
compatible with or enhance the character of the existing area
. The site is a new industrial development located in the vicinity of the Lake
Simcoe Regional Airport and along an existing aggregate haul route. The scale
and form of development has been designed to be compatible with the
surroundings. As additional industrial development occurs on the 26.3 ha
parcel scale and form of development will be assessed further as required.
Not if you can see the conveyors and the material coming off of them and a/i the piles of material; from the air it will/oak
awful. Once again the smell
Outdoor lighting complements the setting
. Any outdoor lighting shall meet the Township's standards.
Development be clustered at the edge of significant open spaces
. The site is not located near any significant open space area.
Road patterns fit and complement the topography
. As the proposal is to create two large industrial parcels (17.4 ha and 26.3 ha)
an internal road pattern has not been proposed. The 17.4 ha parcel will be
used entirely for a recycling establishment with no requirement for an internal
road. As further development occurs on the 26.3 ha parcel road patterns will
be assessed further. The existing and proposed entrances have been reviewed
on the basis of existing entrances to the Lake Simcoe Regional Airport and
usage and traffic patterns on Line 7 North.
Sign by-laws reduce the undesirable visual impacts of signs
. Any sign proposed for the site will meet the Township's standards.
Cultural heritage resources shall be conserved
. This policy is generally a municipal wide policy. There are no specific
cultural resources on the site.
Green spaces, parks and open space, where possible, be connected
. This is an industrial plan of subdivision which do not provide for these
provisions, although a landscaped buffer will be provide around the exterior of
the 17.4 ha parcel.
Not true according to 4.13 wildlife crossover and along the backside of the properties (deer run according to Mr.
Bill Peacock) further study needs to be done in this area
MHBC Planning
Try Recycling Inc & 1531448 Ontario Inc. (bottom of page 6)
Township ofOro-Medonte
A mix of housing types (variety of houses and lot sizes) be included in
residential developments and subdivisions
. As indicated above this is not applicable to this industrial plan of subdivision.
Communities be developed having a strong pedestrian orientation and,
. Again this is not applicable to the industrial plan of subdivision proposed.
The integration of trails and pathways
. Not applicable to the proposed industrial plan of subdivision.
The proposed industrial plan of subdivision application for TRY Recycling Inc. and
1531448 Ontario Inc. conforms to the spirit and intent of these policies.
4.2 Township of Oro-Medonte Official Plan
The lands subject to the plan of subdivision application are designated "Industrial"
with an "Environmental Protection Two Overlay" in the Township's Official Plan. The
"Environmental Protection Two Overlay" designation is located on lands in the south
east corner of the site within the 26.3 ha block (Block 3 on attached plan) proposed
for future industrial use.
Right now zoned AIR preserve farmland
The Vision of the Plan encourages additional economic activity by designating lands
in the vicinity of the Lake Simcoe Region Airport for industrial/commercial purposes.
Pillar # 5 of the Official Plan Principles also encourages development that results in
an increase in economic activity provided that it does not have a negative impact on
the natural environment, natural resources, or the rural character. The proposed use
will not only encourage additional economic activity not currently provided in the
municipality; but will also assist in maintaining the rural character of the Township
through the proposed configuration of the parcel.
Clashes with other pit/ars and does not maintain rural character from the backside.
The agricultural areas of the Township are also considered to be an important component of what makes up the
character of the community These areas must be preserved for future agricultural use so that they can continue to
serve an important role in the focal economy. The fragmentation of agricultural areas and the introduction of
incompatible uses in these areas wit/ be strongly discouraged by this Official Plan. (Oro-Medonte Vision pg. 17)
The vast majority of the Township's residents work and shop in neighbouring Barrie and Orillia. Many jobs and dollars
leave the community. Addilional economic development in the Township will be encouraged by the Official Plan to
reduce these outflows,. provided there are no negative impacts on the natural environment, natural resources or Rura!
character of the communily or on the quality of life now enjoyed by the Township's residents. (Oro-Medonte Vision pg.
17,18) Changes to the water quaiity and hydrologIcal and hydrogeological characteristics of watercourses, lakes and
wetlands are to be minimized and no development will be pennitted that will result in a negative impact to the critical
functions and processes of these features. (Pillar A2. 1. 1 Principles)
Lands that have Ihe potential of being used for agricultural purposes shall be protected from incompatible development
to ensure that fanning operations can operale with the maximum degree of flexibilily and efficiency. (Pillar A2.2. 1
Principles)
The Goals, Objectives and General Development policies of the Township's Official
Plan were reviewed in the context of development of this site and it has been
determined that the spirit and intention of these policies shall be adhered to with this
development.
4.2.1 Industrial - Special Development PolicY
Section D7.5.2 contains the special development policy for the West Half of Lots 18
and 19, Concession VIII (Oro) including the lands which are the subject of this plan
of subdivision application. These policies state that prior to the
MHBC Planning
Try Recycling Inc & 1531448 Ontario Inc. (bottom page 7)
Township of Oro-Medonte
consideration of a plan of subdivision application a Comprehensive Development Plan
(CDP) shall be completed that deals with such issues as: servicing (water and
sewage), traffic, storm water management, and the form, scale, and density of
development. The applicant's are currently completing all the components of the
Comprehensive Development Plan to be submitted to the Township in the near
future. These would include a Traffic and Access Review, a Functional Servicing
Report and Stormwater Management Report, and this Planning Analysis report.
Each of these issues is discussed further below in regard to how these are being
addressed to satisfy the policies of the Official Plan.
4.2.1.1 Servicing
R.J. Burnside is preparing a Preliminary Servicing Report for the 43.7 ha site that will
support the plan of subdivision application as well as the rezoning application
submitted previously for the recycling establishment. This Report will be provided to
the Township in the near future.
The recycling establishment that will be located on the 17.4 ha parcel will require
minimal water and sewage services for employee facilities and not for any specific
processing related to this use on the site. The means of servicing the proposed use
would be most appropriately completed through individual services based on the
nature of the use. Given the limited amount of water and sewage proposed by this
application no other form of servicing would be considered appropriate or feasible.
Based on the large land areas proposed by this application, these requirements can
be accommodated within the site.
The balance of the lands (26.3 ha parcel) will be further assessed once future end
industrial users are determined.
More information required, as report is only Preliminary and seems to have a couple of flaws (covered earlier).
Permitted uses in the Industrial designation shall generally be serviced by private water and sewage systems. As a
result, new uses in this designalion shall be resllicled to uses that use water only for Ihe personal needs of the
employees. (Oro-Medonte OP 07.3) Composting requires water, dust conlrol, the public gardens, cleaning equipment
etc.
4.2.1.2 Traffic
Cole Engineering Group Ltd. undertook a study of the transportation requirements of
development of the property entitled "TRY Recycling Traffic Access and Review,
Township of Oro-Medonte" dated August 2005 to support the rezoning application
previously submitted to the Township. This Report concluded that new site traffic
generated by the proposed recycling establishment would be minimal, that no
specific traffic mitigation measures were required to accommodate the additional
traffic generated by the recycling establishment, that no southbound left turn lane is
required on Line 7 North into this site, and that a 60 metre northbound right turn
taper is recommended on Line 7 North into the new entrance of the Try Recycling
faci Iity.
Site distances and ingress and egress to the property meet or exceeds the Ministry
of Transportation Guidelines. There is one proposed access to the Try
The study is flawed, has a couple of errors (covered earlier)
MHBC Planning
Try Recycling Inc & I 531448 Ontario Inc. (bottom of page 8)
Township ofOro-Medonte
Recycling facility from Line 7 North and one existing access into the 65 acre
industrial site.
An addendum report is currently being completed by Cole Engineering as a result of
the plan of subdivision application to more specifically investigate the traffic impact
potential of the 26.3 ha site with future industrial uses, the appropriateness of this
southerly entrance and the need for any upgrades to this existing entrance.
Sections H1.2.4 and H1.5 specifically detail policies related to the consideration of
traffic impact for any proposed industrial use and also specifically the consideration
of a proposed use in relation to the access to the gravel haul route (Line 7 North)
and are being addressed through the traffic report.
4.2.1.3 Stormwater Ouality and Ouantity
Section G2.2 states that all major industrial development proposals shall be
supported by a Storm Water Management (SWM) report. A Preliminary Stormwater
Management Report is currently being prepared by R.J. Burnside to support the plan
of subdivision and rezoning applications and to satisfy the requirements of the
Township's Official Plan. Storm water management will be required to be addressed
within the 17.4 ha parcel to be utilized for the recycling establishment in order to
satisfy the Ministry of the Environment Certificate of Approval process which will be
discussed further in the Burnside report.
Doesn't seem to address contamination groundwBteror soil, needs a fuN EfS
4.2.1.4 Scale, Form, Density of Development
\
.
"
The layout of the plan of subdivision would contain two industrial lots being a 17.4 ha
parcel (recycling establishment) and a 26.3 ha parcel (future industrial use). The
proposed land use requires a large land area for the outdoor storage of materials and
the appropriate landscaping. The 17.4 ha parcel is required to accommodate the
recycling establishment which will include: driveway access, scale house, conveyors,
and outdoor storage and processing on the back 16.1 ha. This proposal maintains the
frontage of the subject lands for other future industrial development as contemplated
by the Industrial designation in the Official Plan. This layout also ensures that
visibility of the recycling establishment from the municipal road is minimized as
visibility is not required for the viability of this business. The future industrial lands
(26.3 ha) are configured to ensure that an appropriate development design can be
completed with an appropriate road structure.
It'll be visible from the other sides (backside).
4.2.2 Township Official Plan Conclusions
It is submitted that the draft plan of subdivision application conforms to the
policies of the Township of Oro-Medonte Official Plan.
There seems to be a severa! problems as mentioned above.
MHBC Planning
Try Recycling Inc & 1531448 Ontario Inc. (bottom page 9)
Township ofOro-Medonte
5.0 THE PLANNING ACT
The Planning Act has various criteria which are to be regarded when a municipality
considers an application for Draft Plan Approval. Most of these have been previously
addressed however they are specifically discussed as follows:
(a) the effect of the proposal on matters of Provincial Interest - this proposal will
have no detrimental effect on matters of Provincial Interest as outlined in
Section 2 of the Planning Act.
(b) whether the subdivision is premature or in the public interest - The site has
been designated for industrial development in the Township's Official Plan
since 1997 and thus consideration of whether industrial development should
proceed in this area has already occurred. The site is the first of two large
parcels for industrial development in the vicinity of the Lake Simcoe Regional
Airport along an existing established municipal road (haul route). It is
submitted that the development of the lands in a form which is contemplated
by the OP is not premature and is in the public interest.
Much has changed since 1997 especially the formation of the greenbelt and the effects it will have on Barrie and the
surrounding areas, including Ora-Medonte, therefore the development of this parcel or the other parcel is premature
unlil the effecls of the greenbelt can be detennined
It is not in the best interest of the public to develop this land at present at this time, since once again the effecls of the
greenbelt are nol truly known at Ihis time. Also, il would seem the propose of holding these lands under an AIR zoning
4>'
with a designation as induslrial was to control industrial or commercial development that was not compatible with the
airport.
It would seem Ihat In order 10. as Simcoe County's OP says In section 3.9 SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT AREAS "... such
as Casino Rama and Ihe Lake Simcoe Regional Airport. The County recognizes such areas through a county official
plan designation and local municipalities should comprehensively plan such areas in erder to MAXIMIZE THEIR
ECONOMIC BENEFITS AND LONG TERM VITALITY while ensuring that development pat/ems and designs recognize
and protect environmental fealures and functions." a form of holding off incompatible development was, and still is,
required until growth in the Region and the maxing out of GTA airpOlts makes best use of/he airport viable. To open
these tands at this point would therefore be very premature and not in the publics best interest.
A 40 acre open air recycling facility is not making the best use of this land and is truly not compatible with Ihe airport or
the surrounding area.
(c) whether the plan conforms to the official plan and adjacent plans of
subdivision, if any - As has been identified throughout this report, the proposal
conforms to the Township's Official Plan and is the first of two industrial
developments proposed across from the Lake Simcoe Regional Airport.
Disagree as to conformity as state in several places
(d) the suitability of the land for the purposes for which it is to be subdivided -
The site is not subject to any environmental or engineering constraints, and
has been designated for this form of industrial use for a significant number of
years.
See above
(e) the number, width, location and proposed grades and elevations of highways,
and the adequacy of them, and the highways linking the highways in the
proposed subdivision with the established highway system in the vicinity and
the adequacy of them - The site is bounded by a municipal road (Line 7 North)
which has been upgraded in the recent past and has been designated as an
aggregate haul route. A traffic analysis prepared for the site has identified that
the proposed entrance is appropriate for the form of development proposed at
this time.
The study has some flaws and therefore may not be valid.
(f) the dimensions and shapes of the proposed lots - The proposed lots are
consistent with requirements of the Township of Oro-Medonte Zoning Bylaw
and should further industrial re-development occur on the 26.3 ha parcel this
would be re-assessed at that time.
Seems to be in conflict with Simcoe County's OP section 3.9
MHBC Planning
Try Recycling Inc & 1531448 Ontario Inc. (bottom of page 10)
Township ofOro-Medonte
~uk_
(g) the restrictions on the lands to be subdivided or the buildings and structures
proposed to be erected on it and the restrictions, if any, on adjoining land-
There are no restrictions associated with this development.
The proposal regarding Try Recycling seems to contravene By-law 97-95 buildings wouid go a long way
towards sOlving some of the problems. Tiley would contain dust, dirt, particulate maler, noise elc.. Even
composting can be done inside and the smeJl eliminated if done correctly.
(h) conservation of natural resources and flood control - There are no natural
resources on the site affected by the development at this time. Land form
conservation has been considered on the site and the site will be graded to
generally follow the existing land form. Stormwater management facilities will
be incorporated into the design of the 17.4 ha site for Try Recycling Inc. and
will meet both Ministry of the Environment and Township criteria.
Not complete as previously mention
(I) the adequacy of utilities and municipal services - Municipal water and sewar
services are not available in the vicinity of the site. Utilities such as telephone
and hydro can be properly extended to service the site.
(j) the adequacy of school sites - As this is an industrial plan of subdivision the
adequacy of school sites is not applicable.
(k) the area of land, if any, exclusive of highways, to be conveyed or dedicated for
public purposes - No lands are proposed to be conveyed at this time.
(I) the physical layout of the plan having regard to energy conservation -The 17.4
ha site is being designed for overall use in its entirety as a recycling
establishment that will look to promote energy conservation. The balance of
the site will be subject to further assessment as future industrial users are
determined.
Easy to say please provide details.
6.0 THE PROVINCIAL POLICY STATEMENT
The Provincial Policy Statement was issued under Section 3 of the Planning Act and it
is intended to provide policy direction for land use matters which are of Provincial
Interest. Planning Authorities are to be consistent with the Policy Statement when
exercising any authority. A review of the Provincial Policy Statement has been
undertaken with respect to the proposed plan of subdivision that would permit a
recycling establishment and other industrial uses on this Industrially designated site
and because the PPS encourages the promotion of employment areas with a mix and
range of employment to meet the long term needs of the Township, and to provide
opportunities for a diversified economic base to support a wide range of economic
activities, and because this proposal would permit an increase to the industrial base
in the Township, it has been determined that the proposal meets the intention of the
Policy Statement.
Same as before at what cost to other existing businesses, aglicufture and the focal residents who will be negatively
affected by this propos at. Once again circumstances have changed quickly and dramalically since these OP's were
produced the main ilem being the formation of the greenbelt and the importance of agriculluralland.
tu
MHBC Planning
Try Recycling Inc & I 531448 Ontario Inc. (Bottom of page 11)
Township ofOro-Medonte
7.0 ZONING BY-LAW
The site is zoned Agricultural/Rural (A/RU) Zone in the Township's Zoning Bylaw
97-95, as amended. An application for rezoning for the 17.4 ha (43 acre) parcel for
the recycling establishment was previously submitted to the Township with a
separate planning analysis provided to support that application. That portion of the
site is proposed to be rezoned to a site specific Economic Development (ED*) Zone
that would recognize the recycling establishment as being a primarily outdoor use
rather than being located in premises as required by the current zoning by-law
definition. All other zone provisions related to setbacks will be maintained on this
portion of the site. The balance of the lands 26.3 ha (65 acres) are not subject to a
rezoning application at this time and will continue to be located in an
Agricultural/Rural (A/RU) Zone until such time as future industrial uses for the
parcel are determined.
The zoning by-law amendment submitted to the Township would conform with the
Industrial designation of the site and would be appropriate for the development of
the site.
Should be located in doors as previously mentioned especially at Ihis location. Better property taxed couid be
realized. Still not besl use of the land.
8.0 CONCLUSION
It is our opinion that the proposal for the development of a recycling establishment
and a 2 lot plan of subdivision conforms to the County of Simcoe Official Plan,
Township of Oro-Medonte Official Plan, and the Provincial Policy Statement. While a
Site Specific Zoning By-law is needed to permit the specific form of recycling
establishment proposed by TRY Recycling (Barrie) Inc., the property can be zoned
effectively.
On the basis of the analysis detailed in this report, it is our opinion that the approval
of the plan of subdivision application represents good planning.
Does not represent good planning. It's nol in keeping with OPs since il has so many problems. The Try facility should
not be located at this location since it does not lruly represent a good use for tlJis prime piece of land. It should be
localed on a more marginal property possibly inside a reforested piece of Simcoe Forest iand that would truly provide a
decent buffer for an open air recycling facility
Respectfully Submitted,
MHBC Planning
Andria Leigh, MCIP RPP Senior Planner
cc. TRY Recycling Inc.
1531448 Ontario Inc.
. MHBC Planning
Try Recycling Inc & 1531448 Ontario Inc. (bottom of page 12)
Township ofOro-Medonte
\7'\
, 'J
'.
a
Agricultural Advisory Team
Advice to the
Government of Ontario
October 2004
, .
INTRODUCTION
In June 2004, Agriculture and Food Minister Steve Peters appointed us as advisors to the provincial
government to ensure that Ontario's growth management strategy addresses the concerns of agricultural
stakeholders, especially with respect to on-going economic viability.
In making the announcement, Minister Peters said the Agricultural Advisory Team would help protect
Ontario's agricultural interests while furthering the government's commitment to establish a greenbelt
and build strong communities.
We travelled the province and heard from a cross-section of Ontario farmers and other key stakeholders
about the concerns and opportunities facing Ontario agriculture today. While there was not always
consensus, or even agreement, on some fundamental issues among those from whom we heard, there was
an honest attempt to make constructive suggestions and define workable solutions to sustain and enhance
Ontario's agriculture industry.
We heard about the urgent need for government and the industry to work together to develop a clear
vision to enable Ontario agriculture to be sustainable both economically and environmentally, today and
in the future.
We heard about the wide range of things that must be done to enable sustainahility, and the hard choices
that must be made if agriculture is to continue to be the successful economic driver it has been throughout
Ontario's history.
We also heard that some of the core functions ofthe Ministry of Agriculture and Food have been eroded
over the past several years, and there is a need to restore the Ministry's ability to be influential in areas
impottant to Ontario agriculture.
The advice we received during our meetings formed the basis of this report. Among the priorities going
forward is the pressing need to map Ontario's agricultural resource, the need to transform Ontario's land
use planning system and its tax and assessment regime, making them more responsive to the needs of
agriculture.
It is within this context - and at a time when the province is proposing wide-ranging change to its land
use planning and growth-management policies - that we have focused the mandate given us by Minister
Peters and the Ontario Government.
The complexity and diversity within the agriculture industry necessitates that many other Ontario
Government ministries must work in concert with Agriculture and Food to achieve solutions to the
challenges faced by the industry. These governmental partners include, among others, the Ministries of
Natural Resources, Attorney General, Environment, Finance, Municipal Affairs and Housing, Health and
Long-Term Care, and Tourism and Recreation.
Everyone must clearly understand that there is a finite amount of productive land in Ontario and without
it we lose the ability to feed ourselves and our children. Agriculture and farmers are vital to the quality of
life we enjoy in Ontario and must be recognized and respected for the contributions they make to our
communities, our environment and the well-being of our society.
/':?i;L.
~r
(ft~f'
The Honourable Lyle Vanclief
Bob Bedggood
3
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction............................................................. 3
Our Mandate...... .............................................. ........ 4
Consultation Process...... ......................................... .... 4
What We Heard.. ....... ................................................ 4
Advice To Government ...... ....... ... ...... ... ...... ... ......... .....6
2
OUR MANDATE
In establishing the Agricultural Advisory Team, the Ontario Government asked us to seek input
from farmers and technical experts on a variety ofland use and planning issues, including:
. Land-use planning policies that affect farm viability, including specific issues relating to the
Farm and Food Production Protection Act, the minimum distance separation formulae and
conflict resolution practices.
. Criteria to help identify viable blocks of prime agricultural land.
. The range ofland uses suitable for specialty crop areas.
. The role non-government land trusts and other organizations could play, including
identifying supportive and educational tools to protect agricultural land.
. Regional market/educational strategies to improve public/market awareness and strengthen
local opportunities for agricultural activities in protected areas.
We were also asked to suggest strategies to strengthen opportunities for agricultural activities in
protected areas and to identify other, more complex, agricultural land use planning issues to be
addressed in the long term.
CONSULT A nON PROCESS
Acting on a recommendation from the Golden Horseshoe Greenbelt Task Force, the Minister of
Agriculture and Food established the Agricultural Advisory Team with a provincial mandate and
focus. To gather as much infonnation as possible to provide relevant and practical advice to the
provincial government, the Agricultural Advisory Team conducted a consultation process that
focused on achieving both geographic reach and obtaining technical expertise and opinion.
Hence, our advice was shaped and influenced by both the commonality and divergence of
opinion we heard in our I I stakeholder meetings throughout the province. In addition, we
received a number of written submissions from stakeholders and the public.
WHAT WE HEARD
Because our mandate was provincial, we heard many comments and suggestions that reflected
local or regional viewpoints on such key issues as severances, zoning and the need for
infrastructure.
Yet, we also heard much common thinking on those topics and other fundamental issues such as
the need to refine the Minimum Distance Separations (MDS) formulae and the need for greater
use of conflict-resolution mechanisms to resolve differences before they escalate to the courts.
We also heard that the issues and challenges faced by farmers and rural residents on the edge of
major urban centres are significantly different than those who live just outside them and often
vastly different than those who live in more distant farming areas across rural Ontario.
4
We acknowledge the work of the two broadly-based Task Forces in the Niagara Region and the
Greater Toronto Area (GTA). The issues and challenges faced by living and farming in the
"urban shadow" are well documented and analyzed in these reports: The Regional Chair '5 Task
Force for the Long-Term Viability of Farming in Niagara and the GTA Regions and Federations
of Agriculture Proposed GTA Agricultural Action Plan.
While we provide more context and detail in our advice, we believe the key issues identified can
be most effectively grouped under four key themes, with the sustaining economic viability of
agriculture being the common thread that links them all. Those themes are:
Land nse and planning
Issues and items identified include:
. Use and granting of severances;
. Minimum Distance Separations (MDS) formulae;
. Provincial planning reforms, including the Greenbelt and Growth Management initiatives;
. "Leapfrogging" of development pressure;
. Easements and land trusts;
. Protection of specialty crop areas;
. IdentifYing viable blocks of prime agricultural land;
. Setting urban boundaries; and
. Zoning and related mechanisms to keep land in agricultural production
Tax and assessment reform
Issues and items identified include:
. Tax and assessment policies that support and encourage value-added, on-farm enterprises;
. Scope and scale standards or guidelines for on-farm enterprises;
. Better recognition of the environmental services and benefits flowing to society from
stewardship on rural lands; and
. Tax transfers, development charges and/or other fiscal mechanisms to protect farmland or to
"compensate" farmers who perceive potential loss of land value ~ or the opportunity to sell
their land at a higher value ~ because of provincial land use and planning initiatives.
Public education and promotion
Issues and items identified include:
. Increased promotion and marketing of Ontario agriculture;
. More profile and support for Foodland Ontario;
. Greater public and consumer education about the value of agriculture to Ontarians, the
province's economy and environment and the quality and safety of Ontario food; and,
. The need to maintain a secure supply of Ontario produced food.
Goverument fundiug, policy, regulation or legislation
Issues and items identified include:
. The Farm and Food Production Prolection Act (FFPPA);
. The Trespass to Property Act and liability;
. Mandated agricultural advisory committees at the municipal level;
. More funding for agricultural research and related programs; and
. Proactive resource management to better control predation and crop damage by wildlife.
5
\
ADVICE TO GOVERNMENT
This advice does not encompass all the issues and concerns we heard during the stakeholder
meetings. However, we have attempted to distill themes and issues that were common to the
industry .
Using our mandate as the focus, our advice is intended to move Ontario agriculture forward,
prevent further fragmentation of farmland and infrastructure, and enhance the viability of
farmers.
Mapping Ontario's agricultural resouree
Without an identifiable and productive land base, Ontario cannot continue to support a viable
agricultural industry. A key priority must be to determine where the agricultural land base is,
what it produces and what its potential is for the future.
Viability is much more than just soil quality - although that is important. It covers a range of
factors from climate to access to markets; but most importantly it is about having the land we
need for on-going production of safe and secure Ontario-grown food.
We need to know as much about Ontario's agricultural resource as we know about Ontario's
natural and economic resources, if we are going to make sound land use and planning decisions
about agriculture. Moreover, the benefits and impacts move beyond agriculture, because if farms
are viable, rural communities will also be more viable. Therefore we advise that the Ontario
Government, through the Ministry of Agriculture and Food:
Begin immediately to map Ontario's agricultural resource, enabling sound decision-
making that would encourage and strengthen the viability of agriculture. This should
focus on:
. Exercising leadership in forging strong partnerships with key stakeholders to
develop comprehensive criteria, which will enable the quick and accurate
identification of this resource;
. Identifying, protecting and preserving unique specialty crops areas;
. Funding targeted research and using proven techniques such as Land Evaluation
and Area Review (LEAR) studies to help snpport this initiative;
. Providing resources for on-going oversight to monitor, support and ensure
compliance with provincial policies; and
. Developing these maps for agricultural lands in the Greater Toronto Area and the
Greater Golden Horseshoe as part of the release of the government's Greenbelt and
Growth Management initiatives.
Urban boundaries
Accurate mapping of Ontario's agricultural resource will enable better growth management
planning by both the provincial and municipal governments. Agricultural land can no longer
simply be seen as the place where urban development could occur.
6
-(
.,)
We heard that growth management needs to focus as much on encouraging development within
existing urban boundaries through intensification, in-filling and brownfields development, as it
does on setting new boundary lines. Therefore, we advise that the Ontario Government:
Establish clearly defined urban boundaries for residential, commercial and industrial uses
to provide the agriculture industry with the confidence needed to plan its long-term
investments. These boundaries should address the following requirements and/or
concerns:
. Preventing fragmentation of agricultural land;
. Predictability for future land use and agricultural operations;
. Preventing 'Ieap-frogging' of development from protected areas into adjacent ones;
. Fulfilling urban density criteria before boundary expansion occurs; and
. Lowering infrastructure and servicing costs for urban communities.
Severances
At every regional meeting there was a lengthy discussion on the impact of severances on the
business of farming. Should there be a strong provincial policy statement that prohibits them, or
should there be sufficient flexibility to ensure that local and regional circumstances can be
addressed?
We heard that almost 80 per cent of new lots created on Ontario's agricultural land between 1990
and 2000 were for residential use.
We heard from some that severances attract ratepayers to support schools and pay for social and
public safety services and roads, but we also heard from others that these severances add cost
and servicing pressures to rural municipalities.
We heard allowing severances may provide farmers with needed capital, but severances may also
restrict future farm expansion and lead to conflict in local communities. Recognizing these
issues, and mindful ofthe continuing negative impact of fragmentation on Ontario's farmland,
we advise that the Ontario Government:
Develop a strong provincial policy statement prohibiting severances for residential
purposes on agricultural land, except:
. Surplus farm dwellings where the construction of a new dwelling on the property is
prohibited through a restricted covenant on the deed, an agricultural easement,
agriculture production only zoning, or a com bination of the above.
This advice is conditional on the Ontario government finding and enacting the proper legal
tool(s) to ensure the severed property remains in agriculture over the long term.
Minimum Distance Separation (MDS)
Another topic raised at every meeting was the Minimum Distance Separation (MDS), a planning
tool used to determine a recommended distance between a livestock facility and other land uses.
The objective of MDS is to prevent land use conflicts and minimize nuisance complaints.
7
\
MDS varies according to a number of factors, including type of livestock, size of the farm
operation, type of manure system and the form of development present or proposed. There are
two MDS formulae:
. MDS I provides minimum distance separation for new development from existing
livestock facilities; and
. MDS II provides minimum distance separation for new or expanding livestock facilities
from existing or approved development.
Based on what we heard many have difficulty in understanding MDS and how it is applied and
enforced. We also heard that farmers need long-term confidence that other surrounding land
uses will not unduly hinder their present and future farm operations. We advise that the Ontario
Government, through the Ministry of Agriculture and Food:
Integrate MDS I and MDS II into a common MDS formula that treats livestock uses and
non-farm development the same. As part ofthis process the government should also:
. Review MDS every five years to incorporate proven technological advances and
innovation;
. Ensure the MDS expansion factor is only applied to an existing livestock facility
after three years of use;
. Require existing lots of records to meet MDS standards;
. Allow minor variances from MDS of up to five per cent; and
. Provide additional training and guidance to planning authorities and the general
public to assist with implementation ofMDS.
Farm and Food Production Protcction Act (FFPP A)
We heard that there are locally-based mechanisms that have been effective in resolving conflicts
between farmers or between farmers and their non-farm neighbours. However, we frequently
heard the need to strengthen the Farm and Food Production Protection Act (FFPPA), to enable
farmers to engage in normal and approved agricultural practices. Therefore, we advise that the
Ontario Government, through the Ministry of Agriculture and Food:
Urge greater reliance on the Farm and Food Production Protection Act to clearly identity
normal and approved farm practices. Improve the application and awareness of the Act
by:
. Emphasizing early-mediation and conflict resolution to address contentious issues
before they escalate, including calling upon and involving people with expertise and
knowledge of agriculture issues to act as mediators with the goal of avoiding a
hearing; and
. Increasing public education and communications to raise awareness and
understanding in both the farm and non-farm community about normal and
approved farm practices.
Agricultural advisory committees
To ensure that in municipal land use, planning and development decisions that may have a
significant impact on the viability of agriculture are made with the strong input and expertise of
farmers and others in the agricultural sector, we advise that the Ontario Government:
8
tu k_-
Mandate that agricnltural advisory committees be established in all municipalities with
lands zoned for agriculture within their boundaries. These committees should be
constituted at the level of municipal government that has the responsibility for the land use
planning function.
Permitted on-farm uses
We heard one of the issues linked to economic viability is the opportunity for farmers to operate
auxiliary businesses on their farms. We recognize the importance of value-added and value-
retaining agricultural activities, provided they are secondary to the agricultural use on the farm,
and are derived from products from that individual farm operation. We advise that the Ontario
Government:
Allow on-farm businesses of any kind, provided they are secondary to the agricultural
operation and meet the following criteria:
. Gross income less than the gross income of the farm;
. No more than 1,600 square feet in size;
. No more than 4,500 hours annually of employee work time; and
. Serviced by approved on-site private systems.
Tax and assessment of permitted on-farm uses
Related to the issue of permitted on-farm business uses is how they are assessed and at what tax
rate. We heard at many meetings that there is considerable uncertainty and frustration over how
these tax and assessment rates are applied.
We also heard about the urgency with which the province and the farm community must
continue and conclude current discussions to clarify assessment policy and taxation levels. We
laud the recent approach taken affecting maple syrup production.
We advise that the Ontario Government:
Apply the farm tax rate to auxiliary on-farm businesses, as described in the above advice.
For businesses outside those criteria, we urge the Municipal Property Assessment
Corporation, in consultation with the farm community, to define within the next 12 months
a clear set of rules so farmers know what is allowcd and at what tax rate.
Control of predation and crop damage by wildlife
Farmers across Ontario told us that they are experiencing significant loss due to livestock
predation and crop damage by wildlife. Witb estimates of crop damage alone identified at
approximately $40 million annually, farmers are growing increasingly frustrated and are calling
for strong and proactive action from government to address this costly and growing problem.
While we acknowledge the recent announcement by the Ministry of Natural Resources to help
farmers who face economic hardship due to deer-caused crop damage, this policy must be
extended to cover other wildlife predators that kill livestock and/or destroy crops. Therefore we
advise that the Ontario Government:
9
. Instruct and appropriately fund the Ministry of Natural Resources to improve its
wildlife management strategies in a way that will reduce wildlife predation and crop
damage;
. Direct the Ministry of Natural Resources and other public service agencies to
significantly improvc their response times to land owner concerns about wildlife
predation and crop damage;
. Continue to amend hunting laws and regulations to allow for more flexible and lengthy
seasons, additional tags and higher limits for those wildlife species linked to agricnltural
loss and damage; and
. Develop a public education strategy to improve communications among farmers and
public safety agencies, such as the Ministry of Natural Resources, provincial and
municipal police agencies, about issues related to wildlife predation and damage.
Trespassing on farm property
Trespassing on private lands is an increasingly contentious issue for farmers and other rural
residents across Ontario. A proliferation of outdoor recreational activities and the desire of
urban residents to enjoy green spaces has heightened awareness around this issue. The issue of
trespass requires a concerted public education and communications effort to build greater
awareness and understanding about its impacts and implications. Therefore we advise that the
Ontario Government:
Immediately develop a multi-pronged approach to address trespass on private property,
including:
. Assessing the capacity of current legislation to address today's challenges;
. Stepping up enforcement of current legislation, aud applying the full range of
sanctions to deter violators;
. Partnering with farm organizations to develop a signage program to help deter
trespassing; and
. Expanding public education and communications programs for both farmers and
the public on the due diligence and liability implications related to trespassing
Support for research
We heard strong support across Ontario for greater investment in applied agricultural research,
especially research geared to the needs of specific crops and climatic/soil zones throughout the
Province. We heard that the 'flat-lining' of research investment coupled with rising costs and
inflation has diminished our ability to conduct the range of leading edge research required to
keep Ontario agriculture viable and competitive. We advise that the Ontario Government:
Lead in the creation of new partnerships, which will achieve an increase in research
investment of 10% per year over the next 5 years. This should not fall completely on the
Ministry of Agriculture and Food and should include financial support from ministries
such as Health and Long-Term Care, Economic Development and Trade, and
Environment, as well as the agri-food industry, to address public health issues, food safety
and quality, and water quality.
10
.,
Promotion and marketing
There was considerable discussion at every meeting about the need to more actively support,
promote and market Ontario products to both consumers and retailers. There was also
recognition ofthe strength and effectiveness of Foodland Ontario, with many participants at our
meetings indicating they would like to see greater identification and promotion of Ontario
products so that they become the first choice of the consumer.
As well, there was widespread concern expressed that Ontario not lose its ability, through loss of
productive farmland, to maintain a safe, high-quality and secure locally-grown food supply. We
advise that the Ontario Government:
Enhance promotion and marketing of Ontario agriculture by:
. Building on the strong public and industry support for Foodland Ontario to better
position Ontario products in the marketplace;
. Increasing financial support by enlisting additional partners from within
government and prodncer, processing and retail sectors to promote Ontario
products;
. Working with industry stakeholders to highlight the role that Ontario agriculture
plays in eusuriug a safe, high-quality and secure food supply; and
. Focusiug promotiou and marketing efforts on changing consumer behaviour so they
make Ontario-grown food their first choice and to ask for it by name at retailers.
Land-use planning capacity at OMAF
In concert with our advice regarding mapping of agricultural land, there needs to be an increased
capacity within the Ministry of Agriculture and Food (OMAF) to develop, monitor and influence
land-use and planning policy and decisions that affect agricultural viability. This capacity should
be readily available to other provincial ministries and municipalities and should be geared to
identifying - and protecting, if necessary - those lands, which have potential for agricultural
production both now and in future. Therefore, we advise that the Ontario Government:
Expand aod properly resource OMAF's land use planning function to:
. Conduct research and develop policies, tools and techniques for ideutifying and
protecting agricultural lands;
. Represent agriculture at Ontario Municipal Board hearings, committees of
adjustments, zoning and by-law changes, etc.;
. Monitor and track the province's effectiveness and success in protecting
agricultural lands; and
. Provide additional education and training to municipalities, planners and the
broader public, about the need to preserve agricultural land.
Compensation
Throughout our regional meetings, some presenters suggested that government adopt a range of
fiscal mechanisms to protect farmland or to "compensate" farmers who perceive potential loss of
land value - or the opportunity to sell their land at a higher value - because of provincial and
municipal land use planning initiatives.
II
.
We also heard that there is a difference between loss of current permitted uses on farm property
(i.e. agricultural zoning) and a perceived loss of development opportunities (i.e. speculationlhope
on future permitted uses).
We advise that the Ontario Government:
Does not provide direct compensation for loss of perceived future opportunities, but moves
quickly to implement the other advice in this report to provide Ontario agricultnre with the
investment, snpport and recognition it requires to plan for future prosperity.
Environmental payments
We heard that farmers provide much more than food production. They provide society with
many environmental and natural benefits, for which they may not always be appreciated,
recognized or rewarded by government and the general public. We advise that the Ontario
Government through the Ministries of Agriculture and Food, Environment, Natural Resources
and Tourism and Recreation:
. Recognize and take seriously the environmental benefits agriculture contributes to
society;
. Lead research with both governmental and non-governmcntal stakeholders, to identitY
and assess what has been done in other jurisdictions; and,
. Develop programs and financial incentives to farmers that recognize these societal
contributions and which could provide an additional income stream for agriculture.
Land trusts
We heard from some that land trusts and related initiatives could be a tool in certain specific
instances to keep agricultural land in production and provide farmers with economic support for
reinvestment and expansion.
We also heard that these mechanisms could be an effective tool for public education in areas
where farmland needs to be protected due to intense urban and non-farm encroachment.
We advise that the Ontario Government:
Work with the federal government to change tax laws to recognize land trnsts for
agricuIturallands and support a broader public education campaign about their potential
benefits.
Acknowledgements
The Agricultural Advisory Team would like to acknowledge and thank the many individuals
who took time to provide input for this report.
12
Ila)
~!!1k1/r~~
'7t (-{a ~~ fL+ '/I.L ~
--tM.R.J---h-j <V N.h (/tJ6 ~
Deputy Mayor Hughes .
NOTICE OF MOTION
The Township ofOro-Medonte approved the following resolution for Confidential
Report ADM 2005-058 dated November 23,2005 and ratified on December 7, 2005
regarding Fire Department Restructuring:
February 1,2006
Motion No. CW-21
Moved by Marshall, Seconded by Fountain
It is recommended that the Confidential Report No. ADM 2008-058, Jennifer
Zieleniewski, CAO, re: Personnel Matter (Fire Dept.) be received and adopted; and that
the Chief Administrative Officer be authorized to proceed immediately;
Subsequent to the approval of this motion disagreement has been expressed concerning
the interpretation of one of the recommendations in Confidential Report ADM 2005-058;
Whereas, it has been publicly communicated that" In terms of the move a report in
regards to the merits was presented to Council for their consideration and Council
supported the report unanimously";
And whereas, the chair ruled at the January 25, 2005 Committee of the Whole Meeting
that the procedure followed at the November 17,2004 Council meeting to clarifY the
intent of Recommendation CW-22 on November 27,2002 would not be permitted for
determining interpretation of Motion No. CW-21;
And whereas, the chair has directed that the procedure for addressing the intent of
Motion No. CW-21 ,Confidential Report No. ADM 2008-058 is through a notice of
motion to recind;
And whereas, that the interpretation of this motion in the manner that it has' be carried out
would have required an approved budget and no budget was included in the report;
And whereas, Council expressed that it was necessary to maintain the Neufeld Room as a
meeting room in the Township Office building preventing space to be created for the
manner that the motion has been interpreted;
And whereas, operational staff from the Fire Department have been moved to the
Township Office with no reference in the report being made to operational staff;
Now therefore be it resolved that Motion No. CW-21 --Moved by Marshall, Seconded
by Fountain
"It is recommended that the Confidential Report No. ADM 2008-058, Jennifer
Zieleniewski, CAO, re: Personnel Matter (Fire Dept.) be received and adopted; and that
the Chief Administrative Officer be authorized to proceed immediately"
- be rescinded.
\ ~ \
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
REPORT
Dept. Report No. To: COUNCIL Prepared By:
EES2006-07 Keith Mathieson
Subject: Department:
Council
Proposed Solid Waste Engineering and
Collection Schedule for Oro- Environmental Services
C.ofW. Medonte Date:
Januarv 26, 2006
Motion # R.M. File #:
L04-25960
Date: RolI#:
~ BACKGROUND:
~
The contract for collection of municipal waste within the Township of Oro-Medonte has been awarded
to Mid-Ontario Disposal of Orillia. This contract will be in effect for three (3) years.
Mid-Ontario has been the contractor for Oro-Medonte since amalgamation and both Oro and
Medonte prior to amalgamation.
The routes that existed in both Townships prior to 1994 have, for the most part, not changed and
Mid-Ontario Disposal is now requesting that the present collection schedule be reconsidered. Taking
into account the growth within the Township, Mid-Ontario felt it was time to add one additional
collection date and to revisit the balance of the collection dates.
~ ANALYSIS:
I
On January 16, 2006, a meeting was held with Mr. Keith Mathieson and staff from the County of
Simcoe and Mid-Ontario Disposal, to review the proposed changes to the collection schedule.
A number of changes were discussed and have been implemented on the attached map. The
proposed changes should not have any negative effects on the residents of Oro-Medonte.
\
, The proposed changes will take effect April 1. 2006, with notification of this change being published
in the local papers and North Simcoe News. Notices will also be delivered to residents and posted
on the web sites.
II RECOMMENDATION(S):
I~
1. THAT Report No. EES2006-07 be received and adopted.
2. AND THAT the County of Simcoe be notified of any comments or concerns Council may have.
RespeytfG1T? ubmitted,
(
Keith' hieson
Director of Engineering and Environmental Services
A. \ U"-
C9~VCJ~-
. C;;~)
I .
J, \~.
-~~~
~
- 2-
,-
I
I
I PET. R STREF-T E
I P-
Iz z
.... co ~
~ ~ ~
I(~
MOON TONE-f; OAJ1 E F< XMEAD OAD
g;toro ef/(ns .,,;: ~ ~ ~
Me ~nte ...----:- ~ ~~ i
o :1 -cady ~ rn
J Z (jl
~ 6
MOUNT SAINDI UIS RO D W ~ __ r-,~ 7 ~ i-"
~ z :;; f J> 0 b~
w "" ~~AMROAD ~ ~ '"
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
:FIDE!OAD IN ~ r
Martinville
f1r;
w
Z
~ ...J HORS
~ OCraighurst ~~(':' 1);/ Li ~'/i
,--m .J1j;. ~ ~ I [':.t,t Iv-
lU Jl 1":1N.oi1:J I vr
I;lI~lLfOAD So q" I
BASS-tAKE..~ OEROAb..W
1""- ;::;
/r.~~~R;~~~~
==~_J
"'-=-Waverley
o
VaSEY
o
dJ
PROPOSED
SOLID WASTE
COLLECTION SCHEDULE
ORo-MEDONTE
TER S REET VI
~
F
ETER S REET Vi
Z
""
W
Z
::i
I
-t
-=:J~
~
~1 ~Q.,
r~'
t;.;~
\. -.-- "
~ ---=--~
-
-:
I
MOO STONE OAD ~
Z
..,.
w
Z
::;
Wednesday
collection
on both sides
of Bass lake
Sideroad W
Dalston Z
o -
~
E
o
~
~
:J
I
120/21 SIDERC AD VI-
J i
I
SKI TRAILS R AD
G-
z
r
:J
I ,-
V~~n Hill ~
, ''-'..y(':'
..yo
'10
/" '0,,"""
~t
HIC H'''^V <1
Gilc rist'.....
o -
~
L~
, =-
(f) <fJ
~ "" <fJ
Z ~ ..,.
:J :J W
~ 5
~ID~flfiw ~
'6 .-;
--
~
-
.".
A........
........~
.1'
1/- ',"-j
~l.-'
qN.
,. '-...... I;
;;;
~ Carley 5
5 ~
~
ARMIN TER S~OAD ~ Thursday collection on
IlIi]mste[ North side of Horseshoe
Z 0 V1> I Valley Road E
~ ~ Z ~, .
, ~ ~ Pnces Corner
~ 5 ~ JO
P :J \ Wednesday collecbon on
South side of Horseshoe
I t:::J;<-- Valley Road E
~6RSrSHeJEVALL YROAt-E I ~ ~\ Marchmant
W ~ 0
Bass Lakeco ....-,>- .
Bass ~ake ProVi~. ~
SA S LAKE ~IDEROJi~ ~ r::::
~ I ~ Tuesday collection
I ~ . I on both sides of
i R gby:;; Iz Une4N
J 0 5 r
bT)"8AR'RTE ROAD
""---..,.
~
gar
Z
00
W
Z
::;
z
"-.
i/
3i
:;
z c~lr
~ 15116SJDERO J~DE --< II
" ,/ /(f) :;; ~
~/ ~ 5 wig:
y ~ ~ 0 Cartne:5JY
RO S ROAD ./ A r;t;;--
- v1 -- ~ ::;p,~. >:. "
umne" f'l 0> - ./' ~ f ~
~ fa ~ ~ ~':1 ~k#
~ ~ !~~V~~ ~''---''
~::; ~~ .
l!! ...J =..J I Legend
~ ---'Lblkevl'e~h&l-nr ~ .
::i pr _ PROVINCIAL HIGHWAY MUtllCIPAL BORDER
~~ ra Sa' - COUIlTY ROAD Solid Waste Collection
( ~~o~ - LOCAL ROAD ~ nocalleclion
.-r\(.€.s\"IU" === UNNOPENED ROAD D MONDAY
--J\.. _. _ UNASSUMED ROAD D TUESDAY
- - - PRIVATE ROAD D WEDNESDAY
- WATER ACCESS D THURSDAY
D FRIDAY
z
~
Z
::;
Z
<0
W
Z
:;
Z
OJ
W
Z
::;
15/16 IDERuAi' W
I
T~Y
Z
<0
W
Z
< .~~ ~~. ~.~E~[~~~~;;F:~~
1'1 ~ r".""'oo.lr'"__I~I.<~''''J.....wr_",,,,"....tj_Or.'''''
; I O:~1=~~':;';=~~~::"'
"\~ J<<n!ln....~(lI".u.'""D' i....._...noT(M1j1Zfiu">>...
......rrP4 _._~-,_...._..
o
2
4
.Kilometers
~ \
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
REPORT
Dept. Report No. To: COMMITTEE OF THE Prepared By:
WHOLE
EES2006-02 Keith Mathieson
Subject: Department:
Council
Maplehill Estates (Phase II), Engineering and
Registered Plan 51 M-633 - Environmental Services
C.ofW. Certificate of Maintenance Date:
and Final Acceptance January 23, 2006
Motion # (Underground Works) and R.M. File #:
Certificate of Substantial D12-3364
Date: Completion and Acceptance RolI#:
(Aboveground Works)
I BACKGROUND:
I
The Township of Oro-Medonte entered into a Subdivision Agreement with Maplehill Estates in May,
1999 to construct a sixty-six (66) lot subdivision. This development was constructed in Phases, with
Phase II consisting of thirty-six (36) lots on Northwood Court and Pineview Drive.
II ANALYSIS:
II
The Township's Engineers, Totten Sims Hubicki Associates, have completed an inspection of the
development and are now recommending the issuance of the Certificate of Maintenance and Final
Acceptance (Underground Works) and Certificate of Substantial Completion and Acceptance
(Aboveground Works).
Upon the issuance of these Certificates, the Township will be assuming responsibility of the
Underground Works and the responsibility for winter maintenance of the roads, and the Developer
will be starting the two (2) year maintenance period for the Aboveground Works.
t. RECOMMENDA TION(S):
I
1. THAT Report No. EES2006-02 be received and adopted.
2. THAT the Township issues the Certificate of Maintenance and Final Acceptance (Underground
Works) for Maplehill Estates (Phase II), dated January 16, 2006, Registered Plan 51 M-633.
3. THAT the Township issues the Certificate of Substantial Completion and Acceptance
(Aboveground Works) for Maplehill Estates (Phase II), dated December 9,2005, Registered Plan
51 M-633.
4. THAT a By-law be prepared for Council's consideration.
5. AND THAT the Developer be notified of Council's decision.
Keith athieson
Director of Engineering and Environmental Services
- 2-
y
,:
.
\
II
11M
Totten Sims Hubicki Associates
10 High Street
Barrie, Ontario, Canada L4N lWl
17051721-9222 Fax: 17051 734-0764
E-mail: rrobinson@rgra,ca www.rgra.on.ca
engineers
architects
planners
January 16, 2006
Mr. K. Mathieson, CRSI
Director of Engineering & Environmental Services
Township ofOro-Medonte
Box 100
148 Line 7 South
Oro, Ontario LOL 2XO
Dear Sir:
RE: Township of Oro-Medonte
Maplehill Estates Phase 2
TSH Project No. 440-90042-53 (12)
Further to the completion of deficiencies we now recommend issuance of the Certificate of Maintance and
Final Acceptance for the Underground Works.
The underground works were inspected and found to be acceptable. We now recommend that the
aforementioned Certificate be issued.
If you require further information, please contact our office.
Yours very truly,
~pJ~
S. Patterson, C.E.T.
SP:jd
K:\90042-53\SP Letters 2006\90042S2.doc
A. ~;:,,~~~~,~~~
r~''''COMeA''
.
.
.
.
.~~
architects
planners
~~~~~~
,
TOWNSBJP ENGINEERS
CERTIFICATE OF
MAINTENANCE AND FINAL ACCEPTANCE
(UNDERGROUND WORKS)
MUNICIPALITY
Township of Oro-Medonte
Maplehill Estates - Phase 2
Plan 51M-633
PROJECT
DEVELOPER
1091402 Ontario Ltd.
FILE NO.
12-90042-53 (MMA&H 43T-90055)
Description ofthe Works:
. Storm sewer system and SWM facility in the Maplehill Estates Subdivision Phase 2 on Pineview
Drive and N orthwood Court.
We, R.G. Robinson and Associates (Barrie) Ltd. !Totten Sims Hubicki, notif'y the Municipality that to the
best of our knowledge and judgement:
1. The Developer named herein has completed the required maintenance work, has rectified know
deficiencies and has fulfilled the other terms of the Subdivision Agreement.
2. The period of maintenance of this Subdivision AgI;
nt expires on the issuance of this Certificate.
D~ It, z..d
Signature:
K:\90042-53\Sub.Cert. afM. &F. A Underground. doc
r
...
!J
II
IIH
Totten Sims Hubicki Associates
10 High Street
Barrie, Ontario, Canada L4N 1W1
17051721-9222 Fax: 17051 734-0764
E~mail: rrobinson@rgra.ca www.rgra.on.ca
engineers
architects
planners
January 16,2006
Mr. K. Mathieson, CRSI
Director of Engineering & Environmental Services
Township of Oro-Medonte
Box 100
148 Line 7 South
Oro, Ontario LOL 2XO
Dear Sir:
RE: Township of Oro-Medonte
MaplehiIl Estates Phase 2
TSH Project No. 440-90042-53 (12)
Further to the completion of deficiencies we now recommend issuance of the Certificate of Substantial
Completion and Acceptance for the Aboveground Works.
The aboveground works were inspected and found to be acceptable. We now recommend that the
aforementioned Certificate be issued.
If you require further information, please contact our office.
Yours very truly,
/J jJ~
S. Patterson, C.E.T.
SP:jd
K:\90042-53\SP Letters 2006\90Q42S4.doc
4..:\;.~~~:,;~
.
.,
..
~'Q
. ;~!~;;::~~
Al1IllroMl'AIIY
.~~
architects
planners
TOWNSHIP ENGlNEERS
CERTIFICATE OF
SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE
(ABOVEGROUND WORKS)
MUNICIPALITY
Township of Oro-Medonte
PROJECT
MaplehiU Estates - Phase 2
Plan 51M-633
DEVELOPER
1091402 Ontario Ltd.
FILE NO.
12-90042-53 (MMA&H 43T-90055)
Description ofthe Works:
Roadways in the MaplehilI Estates - Phase 2 Subdivision consisting of:
. PINEVIEW DRIVE from Bidwell Road north to Northwood Court; a distance of658 metres (2,159
feet)
. NORTIfWOOD COURT from Pineview Drive easterly and then south to the cul-de-sac; a distance of
354 metres (1,161 feet)
. NORTHWOOD COURT from Pineview Drive westerly to the cul-de-sac; a distance of 414 metres
(1,358 feet)
We, R.G. Robinson and Associates (Barrie) Ltd./Totten Sims Hubicki, notifY the Municipality that the
above mentioned works were inspected on December 9, 2005 and to the best of our knowledge and
judgement, are complete in accordance with the Subdivision Agreement except for the deficiencies below:
. Nil
We hereby accept these works for use and operation by the Municipality subject to the rectification of the
above noted deficiencies and to the rectification of any further deficiencies that may become apparent
during the maintenance period and to the maintenance that is require by the Subdivision Agreement and its
Amendment.
stablished by the Certificate
The date of Substantial Completion and Acceptance (A
a December 9, 2005.
t 200 i
Signature:
K:\90042~51\Sub.Completion Aboveground.doc
~
.,' "','
._.._' '.. ..,....."'.,...1. '.;' .' " IT....... .
~..,
. ~;"!;:":..l.
-- -
-- -
4
5.
--
6 i
']j
SE 1A
I
ffilW'u::. \.H u..
I
66
9
8
--~ --.....- I
---- "">~\
~~"
~" ..........,
..........,,'.............,'---....
.............,,~ -
------
...'
..----JlI~ R~__.
.-'.............
"
1..0001:\ koln L... ~
SIM_i2.<..
PHASE ,... - LOTS 1 TO 7 AND LOT 36 -a
PHASE 1B - LOTS B TO 11, 34 .Ie 35 AND 37 TO 56 -26
PHASE 2- I.OlS 12 TO 33 AND 57 TO)I(6'5 -32
66 I.OlS TOTAl.
.
.I.~~~ml ~~D~N~
C' - \
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
REPORT
Dept. Report No. To: COMMITTEE OF THE Prepared By:
WHOLE
EES2006-03 Keith Mathieson
Subject: Department:
Council
Woodland Estates, Plan 51 M- Engineering and
726 - Certificate of Environmental Services
C.ofW. Maintenance and Final Date:
Acceptance (Underground Januarv 23, 2006
Motion # Works) and Certificate of R.M. File #:
Substantial Completion and D12-336
Date: Acceptance (Aboveground RolI#:
Works)
II BACKGROUND:
I
The Township of Oro-Medonte entered into a Subdivision Agreement with Woodland Estates in
August, 2002 to develop a forty-eight (48) lot subdivision and one (1) Parkland Block, consisting of
Maple Ridge Road and Oak Ridge Road.
II ANALYSIS:
II
The Township's Engineers, Totten Sims Hubicki Associates, have completed an inspection of the
development and are now recommending the issuance of the Certificate of Maintenance and Final
Acceptance (Underground Works) and Certificate of Substantial Completion and Acceptance
(Aboveground Works).
Upon the issuance of these Certificates, the Township will assume maintenance responsibility of the
Underground Works and winter maintenance of the Aboveground Works. The Developer will be
starting the two (2) year maintenance period for the Aboveground Works.
~ RECOMMENDATION(S):
I
1. THAT Report No. EES2006-03 be received and adopted.
2. THAT the Township issues the Certificate of Maintenance and Final Acceptance (Underground
Works) for Woodland Estates, dated January 16, 2006, Plan 51 M-726.
3. THAT the Township issues the Certificate of Substantial Completion and Acceptance
(Aboveground Works) for Woodland Estates, dated December 9, 2005, Plan 51 M-726.
4. THAT a By-law be prepared for Council's consideration.
5. AND THAT the Developer be notified of Council's decision.
Re~ "bm;."",
Keith Mathieson
Director of Engineering and Environmental Services
- 2-
..
IIH
\
,
engineers
architects
planners
Totten Sims Hubicki Associates
10 High Street
Barrie, Ontario, Canada L4N 1 Wl
17051721-9222 Fax: 1705) 734-0764
E-mail: rrobinson@rgra.ca www.rgra.on.ca
January 16, 2006
Mr. K. Mathieson, CRSI
Director of Engineering & Environmental Services
Township ofOro-Medonte
Box 100
148 Line 7 South
Oro, Ontario LOL 2XO
Dear Sir:
RE: Township ofOro-Medonte
Woodland Estates
TSH Project No. 440-90076-51 (12)
Further to the completion of deficiencies we now recommend issuance of the Certificate of Maintance and
Final Acceptance for the Underground Works.
The underground works were inspected and found to be acceptable. We now recommend that the
aforementioned Certificate be issued.
If you require further information, please contact our office.
Yours very truly,
AjJ~
S. Patterson, c.E.T.
SP:jd
K:\90076-5I \SP Letters 2006\90076S0 I.doc
A ~~!:~~~
r~';,"COM'A"
~ .
,
liJ' till
... . engineers
architects
planners
~RG R~B:SON
...ml~(BAP.,IUE)LTI>_
"nHCOMIW'''''
TOWNSHIP ENGINEERS
CERTIFICATE OF
MAINTENANCE AND FINAL ACCEPTANCE
(UNDERGROUND WORKS)
MUNICIPALITY
Township of Oro-Medonte
PROJECT
Woodland Estates (Sinton/Orsi) Snhdivision
Plan 51M-726
DEVELOPER
1091402 Ontario Ltd.
FILE NO.
12-90076-51 (MMA 43T-91023)
Description of the Works:
. Storm sewer system in the Woodland Estates (Sinton/Orsi) Subdivision.
We, R.G. Robinson and Associates (Barrie) Ltd. !Totten Sims Hubicki, notify the Municipality that to the
best of our knowledge and judgement:
I. The Developer named herein has completed the required maintenance work, has rectified know
deficiencies and has fulfilled the other terms of the Subdivision Agreement.
2. The period of maintenance of this Subdivision Agreement expires on the issuance of this Certificate.
om.~ It, z.,oti
Signature:
K:\90076-51\Sub.Cert, ofM. &F. A Underground. doc
.S.
"
..
VH
Totten Sims Hubicki Associates
, 0 High Street
Barrie, Ontario, Canada L4N lWl
(7051 721,9222 Fax: (7051 734-0764
E-mail: rrobinson@rgra.ca www.rgra.on.ca
r -~
'-
engineers
architects
planners
January 16,2006
Mr. K. Mathieson, CRSI
Director of Engineering & Environmental Services
Township ofOro-Medonte
Box 100
148 Line 7 South
Oro, Ontario LOL 2XO
Dear Sir:
RE: Township ofOro-Medonte
Woodland Estates
TSH Project No. 440-90076-51 (12)
Further to the completion of deficiencies we now recommend issuance of the Certificate of Substantial
Completion and Acceptance for the Aboveground Works.
The aboveground works were inspected and found to be acceptable. We now recommend that the
aforementioned Certificate be issued.
If you require further information, please contact our office
Yours very truly,
A fJZb
S. Patterson, C.E.T.
SP:jd
K:\90076~51\SP Letters 2006\90076S02.doc
A. ~::,'~~~~,:~~
r ~An"COMeA"
t"
<
,
.
\ ~
~~G ROBINSON
ANl>A3s00ATE$(B~)l;rn_
AnmrnMPANY
[]J~
architects
planners
TOWNSHIP ENGINEERS
CERTIFICATE OF
SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE
(ABOVEGROUND WORKS)
MUNICIPALITY
Township of Oro-Medonte
PROJECT
Woodland Estates (SintonlOrsi) Subdivision
Plan 51M-726
DEVELOPER
1091402 Ontario Ltd.
FILE NO.
12-90076-51 eMMA 43T-91023)
Description ofthe Works:
Roadways in the Woodland Estates (SintonlOrsi) Subdivision consisting of:
. MAPLE RIDGE ROAD from Bidwell Road south, then east to the east limit of Lot 35; a distance of
1,283 metres (4,209 feet)
. OAK RIDGE ROAD from Maple Ridge Road south to the cul-de-sac; a distance of 580 metres (1902
feet)
. Fire Water Reservoir and Park Land in Block 54.
We, R.G. Robinson and Associates (Barrie) Ltd.!Totten Sims Hubicki, notify the Municipality that the
above mentioned works were inspected on December 9, 2005 and to the best of our knowledge and
judgement, are complete in accordance with the Subdivision Agreement except for the deficiencies below:
. Nil
We hereby accept these works for use and operation by the Municipality subject to the rectification of the
above noted deficiencies and to the rectification of any further deficiencies that may become apparent
during the maintenance period and to the maintenance that is require by the Subdivision Agreement and its
Amendment.
lished by the Certificate
The date of Substantial Completion and Acceptance (Abo
as of ecember 9,2005.
Date:
Signature:
K:\90076~51\Sub.Completion Aboveground.doc
~
.........
. _.._ . ". .;......".."", '.;' . TJ r ,"'".
, ~1~!
.-- -
v
-'
4
5.
--
6 I
}j
SE 1A
i
ffil'W'u:::. ~ \ u..
36
I
66
9
8
PHASE lA - LOIS 1 TO 7 NjD LOT 36 -a
PHASE 18 - LOIS 6 TO 11. ~ " 35 NjD 37 TO 56 -26
PHASE 2- LOIS 12 TO 33 AND 57 TO]I(65 -32
66 LOIS TOTAL
,
,
~.
...
...
~
,
'--
.
.1"~TAnNl~nsual ~~ ID~Nw
_ -.. r.;- tOWNSHIP rk Dftc)-~ IrU1l
\
\
~\
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
REPORT
Dept. Report No. To: COMMITTEE OF THE Prepared By:
WHOLE
EES2006-04 Keith Mathieson
Subject: Department:
Council
Huronia Homes Subdivision Engineering and
(Phase II), Registered Plan Environmental Services
C.ofW. 51 M-807 - Certificate of Date:
Substantial Completion and January 23, 2006
Motion # Acceptance (Underground R.M. File #:
Works) D12-8856
Date: RolI#:
II BACKGROUND:
II
The Township of Oro-Medonte entered into a Subdivision Agreement with Huronia Homes (Phase II)
in January, 2005, consisting of twenty (20) lots and a Parkland Block on Hemlock Crescent.
t ANALYSIS:
II
The Township's Engineers, Totten Sims Hubicki Associates, have completed an inspection of the
Underground Works for this development and are now recommending the issuance of the Certificate
of Substantial Completion and Acceptance for Underground Works.
Upon the issuance of this Certificate, the Developer will be starting the two (2) year maintenance
period for the Underground Works.
II RECOMMENDATION(S):
II
1. THAT Report No. EES2006-04 be received and adopted.
2. THAT the Township issues the Certificate of Substantial Completion and Acceptance
(Underground Works) for Huronia Homes subdivision (Phase II), Registered Plan 51 M-807, dated
December 9, 2005.
3. THAT a By-law be prepared for Council's consideration.
4. AND THAT the Developer be notified of Council's decision.
ReSpe~~y submitted,
C{
~
Keith Mathieson
Director of Engineering and Environmental Services
- 2 -
J
.,
I
-
VH
\
eng neers
architects
planners
Totten Sims Hubicki Associates
10 High Street
Barrie, Ontario, Canada L4N 1W1
(7051721,9222 Fax: 17051 734-0764
E-mail: rrobinson@rgra.ca www.rgra.on.ca
January 16, 2006
Mr. K. Mathieson, CRSI
Director of Engineering & Environmental Services
Township of Oro-Medonte
Box 100
148 Line 7 South
Oro, Ontario LOL 2XO
Dear Sir:
RE: Township of Oro-Medonte
Huronia Homes Subdivision - Phase 2
TSH Project No. 440-8911-51 (12)
Further to the completion of deficiencies we now recommend issuance of the Certificate of Substantial
Completion and Acceptance for the Underground Works.
The underground works were inspected and found to be acceptable. We now recommend that the
aforementioned Certificate be issued.
If you require further information, please contact our office.
Yours very truly,
;ff~
S, Patterson, C.E.T.
SP:jd
K:\8911-51 \sP Letters 2006\8911S03.OOc
A. ~~.~;'=~
r~A""COM",N>
. .
\
~~
architects
planners
A. ~~~~~~
I'~ArnR~AA~
TOWNSHIP ENGINEERS
CERTIFICATE OF
SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE
(UNDERGROUND WORKS)
MUNICIPALITY
Township of Oro-Medonte
PROJECT
Huronia Homes Suhdivision Phase 2
Plan 51M-807
DEVELOPER
Huronla Homes Ltd.
FILE NO.
12-8911-51 (MMA 43T-91016 )
Descriptiou oCthe Works:
. Storm sewer system and SWM facility for Phase 2 on Hemlock Crescent.
We, R.G. Robinson and Associates (Barrie) Ltd.rrotten Sims Hubicki, notiry the Municipality that the
above mentioned works were inspected on December 9, 2005 and to the best of our knowledge and
judgement, are complete in accordance with the Subdivision Agreement except for the deficiencies below:
. Nil
We hereby accept these works for use and operation by the Municipality subject to the rectification of the
above noted deficiencies and to the rectification of any further deficiencies that may become apparent
during the maintenance period and to the maintenance that is require by the Subdivision Agreement and its
Amendment.
The date of Substantial Completion and Acceptance (Underground Works) is
as of December 9,2005.
::j[:aoo~:,~~,~ ""'~re
blished by the Certificate
I
~ur~-'
. . ..'~.~ ~ ' ~
---- ,., .,.........'- . ~~-'.
-~ ~ - . -- -
66
----........ ""', I
----- . ""'>~\
~~"
~" '"'---,
'"'---~:~----- ~'
~~--- BlQWEu. ROAD
----.---- " ---'e--__..
-~
WOOD L,."'n C.s ~
""IM_ 1"2.':"
I
-~~
PHASE I" - LOlS I TO 7 HiD LOT 36 -a
PHASE 18 - LOlS 8 TO II, 34 " 35 AND 37 TO 58 -26
PHASE 2- LOTS 12 TO 33 AND 57 TO)I(6'5 -32
66 LOTS TOTAl.
-
,
. c.c:. TA1IIAM tASSOClAlIS \.1D.
~ !ngiIMs
~INQ IPU\INI
IW'LEItU.IS1'A1III
TOWNSHtl' Of DR'
SCAl..E.:tt.!iOOQ
OWQ.:,No.
IPIHI
'''''''' tmZ
\
f.: ~ \
,
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
REPORT
Dept. Report No. To: COMMITTEE OF THE Prepared By:
WHOLE
EES2006-05 Keith Mathieson
Subject: Department:
Council
Huronia Homes Subdivision Engineering and
(Phase I), Registered Plan Environmental Services
C.ofW. 51 M-676 - Certificate of Date:
Maintenance and Final January 23, 2006
Motion # Acceptance (Underground R.M. File #:
Works) and Certificate of D12-8856
Date: Substantial Completion and RolI#:
Acceptance (Aboveground
Works)
II BACKGROUND:
II
The Township of Oro-Medonte entered into a Subdivision Agreement with Huronia Homes (Phase I)
in June, 2000. Phase I consists of twenty-four (24) lots on White Pine Drive between Maplehill Drive
and Pineview Drive.
I ANALYSIS:
~
The Township's Engineers, Totten Sims Hubicki Associates, have completed an inspection of the
development and are now recommending the issuance of the Certificate of Maintenance and Final
Acceptance (Underground Works) and Certificate of Substantial Completion and Acceptance
(Aboveground Works).
Upon the issuance of these Certificates, the Township will be assuming responsibility of the
Underground Works and the responsibility for winter maintenance of the road, and the Developer will
be starting the two (2) year maintenance period for the Aboveground Works.
, RECOMMENDATION(S):
\'J.e.-
II
1. THAT Report No. EES2006-05 be received and adopted.
2. THAT the Township issues the Certificate of Maintenance and Final Acceptance (Underground
Works) for Huronia Homes (Phase I), Registered Plan 51 M-676, dated January 16, 2006.
3. THAT the Township issues the Certificate of Substantial Completion and Acceptance
(Aboveground Works) for Huronia Homes (Phase I), Registered Plan 51 M-676, dated December
9, 2005.
4. THAT a By-law be prepared for Council's consideration.
5. AND THAT the Developer be notified of Council's decision.
.....-x
R~"Y ,"Om;lI",
KeitnMathieson
Director of Engineering and Environmental Services
f(}q)
- 2 -
.
!
"
uti
II
eng neers
architects
planners
January 16, 2006
Mr. K. Mathieson, CRSI
Director of Engineering & Environmental Services
Township ofOro-Medonte
Box 100
148 Line 7 South
Oro, Ontario LOL 2XO
Dear Sir:
RE: Township ofOro-Medonte
Huronia Homes Subdivision - Phase 1
TSH Project No. 440-8911-51 (12)
\
1 t-
Totten Sims Hubicki Associates
10 High Street
Barrie, Ontario, Canada L4N 1 W1
1705) 721-9222 Fax; 17051 734-0764
E-mail: rrobinson@rgra.ca www.rgra.on.ca
Further to the completion of deficiencies we now reeommend issuance of the Certificate of Maintance and
Final Acceptance for the Underground Works.
The underground works were inspected and found to be acceptable. We now recommend that the
aforementioned Certificate be issued.
If you require further information, please contact our office.
Yours very truly,
/f ;J~
S. Patterson, C.E.T.
SP:jd
K:\8911-51\SP Letters 2006\8911S01.doc
A ~~::";.~~
r~.,"mM'A"'
;
.
t
~~
architects
planners
TOWNSHIP ENGINEERS
CERTIFICATE OF
MAINTENANCE AND FINAL ACCEPTANCE
(UNDERGROUND WORKS)
MUNICIPALITY
Townsbip of Oro-Medonte
PROJECT
Huronia Homes Subdivision Pbase 1
Plan 51M-676
DEVELOPER
Huronia Homes Ltd.
FILE NO.
12-8911-51 (MMA 43T-91016)
Description oftbe Works:
~\ -
~::~~~~
A.TlIll.COMl'Al<Y
. Storm drainage works for Phase 1 on White Pine Drive from Maplehill Drive to Pineview Drive.
We, RG. Robinson and Associates (Barrie) Ltd. /Totten Sims Hubicki, notifY the Municipality that to the
best of our knowledge and judgement:
1. The Developer named herein has completed the required maintenance work, has rectified know
deficiencies and has fulfilled the other terms of the Subdivision Agreement.
2. The period of maintenance of this Subdivision Agree
expires on the issuance of this Certificate.
6 '&Job
Signature:
Date:
K:\8911~51\Sub. rt. afM. &F. A Underground.doc
I.I
Tnt
\
\
\
Q
'-
II
. ~
Totten Sims Hubicki Associates
10 High Street
Barrie, Ontario, Canada L4N 1W1
(7051721-9222 Fax: (705) 734-0764
E-mail: rrobinson@rgra.ca www.rgra.on.ca
engineers
architects
planners
January 16, 2006
Mr. K. Mathieson, CRSI
Director of Engineering & Environmental Services
Township ofOro-Medonte
Box 100
148 Line 7 South
Oro, Ontario LOL 2XO
Dear Sir:
RE: Township of Oro-Medonte
Huronia Homes Subdivision Phase 1
TSH Project No. 440-8911-51 (12)
Further to the completion of deficiencies we now recommend issuance of the Certificate of Substantial
Completion and Acceptance for the Aboveground Works.
The aboveground works were inspected and found to be acceptable. We now recommend that the
aforementioned Certificate be issued.
If you require further information, please contact our office
Yours very truly,
/i/~
S. Patterson, C.E.T.
SP:jd
K:\8911-51\SP Letters 2006\8911S02.doc
A. ~~s~~~~:~~
r ~ A~"COM'A"
..
.#
~~
architects
planners
~~~~~~
TOWNSIDP ENGINEERS
CERTIFICATE OF
SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE
(ABOVEGROUND WORKS)
MUNICIPALITY
Township of Oro-Medonte
Huronia Homes Subdivision Phase 1
Plan 51M-676
PROJECT
DEVELOPER
Huronia Homes Ltd.
FILE NO.
12-8911-51 eMMA 43T-91016 )
Description ofthe Works:
Roadways in the Huronia Homes Subdivision Phase I consisting of:
. WHITE PINE DRIVE from Maplehill Drive easterly to Pineview Drive; a distance of 389 metres
(1,276 feet)
We, R.G. Robinson and Associates (Barrie) Ltd.lTotten Sims Hubicki, notifY the Municipality that the
above mentioned works were inspected on December 9, 2005 and to the best of our knowledge and
judgement, are complete in accordance with the Subdivision Agreement except for the deficiencies below:
. Nil
We hereby accept these works for use and operation by the Municipality subject to the rectification of the
above noted deficiencies and to the rectification of any further deficiencies that may become apparent
during the maintenance period and to the maintenance that is require by the Subdivision Agreement and its
Amendment.
The date of Substantial Completion and Acceptance (Abovegro nd Wo
as 0 ecember 9, 2005.
e loo6
Signature:
the Certificate
K:\8911-51\Sub.Completion Aboveground.doc
..-
. ___ . ,., ~.tri:i:.:.~~.J., ".;' . .... ,- i, J-,";~ .
~.,'
~~:;<r.'-
~ . ", .'
_..- -
. -~ --
I
9
8
~", I
- '................~'
......~
......
......... ""'....
"",,,'-..........,,---
-..........,,--- '
"-.
I
,~
I
.
...
J~_\'
i1 I
'~
I I.
I
--'
-- I
---l
---J. .........,
',,--
1l)~
'-Z... ~Cy ~
' ~
PHASE lA - LOlS 1 TO 7 AND LOT 36 -a
PHASE lB - LOlS B TO 11. 34 " 35 AND 37 TO 56 -26
PHASE 2- LDlS 12 TO 33 AND 57 TO :;Kt5 -32
66 LD1S TOTAl.
e
,
. c.c. TA1I/AII USSOClAlD L1D.
... !nglwa
~ PU\INI
IMPU!I&L ISI"A1III
TOllN5HtP OF OftD-1
5CAl.E:h5000
-
V
rtJ
DWG. No.
IPH
........ lI7lZ
\ -\
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
REPORT
Dept. Report No. To: COMMITTEE OF THE Prepared By:
WHOLE
EES2006-06 Keith Mathieson
Subject: Department:
Council
Maplehill Estates (Phase IB), Engineering and
Registered Plan 51 M-633 - Environmental Services
C.ofW. Certificate of Maintenance Date:
and Final Acceptance January 23, 2006
Motion # (Aboveground Works) R.M. File #:
D12-3364
Date: RolI#:
II BACKGROUND:
II
The Township of Oro-Medonte entered into a Subdivision Agreement with Maplehill Estates in May,
1999 to construct a sixty-six (66) lot subdivision. This development was constructed in Phases, with
Phase IB consisting of twenty-three (23) lots on Maplehill Drive and Green Mountain Court.
t ANALYSIS:
I
The Township's Engineers, Totten Sims Hubicki Associates, have completed an inspection of the
development and are now recommending the issuance of the Certificate of Maintenance and Final
Acceptance (Aboveground Works) for Phase 1 B.
Upon the issuance of this Certificate, the Township will be assuming responsibility for Phase 1 B of
this development.
II RECOMMENDATION(S):
I
1. THAT Report No. EES2006-06 be received and adopted.
2. THAT the Township issues the Certificate of Maintenance and Final Acceptance (Aboveground
Works) for Maplehill Estates (Phase IB), dated January 20,2006, Registered Plan 51 M-633.
3, THAT a By-law be prepared for Council's consideration.
4. AND THAT the Developer be notified of Council's decision.
R~'Y ,"rnn~ed
Keith Mathieson
Director of Engineering and Environmental Services
- 2 -
I
II
VH
Totten Sims Hubicki Associates
10 HighStreet
Barrie, Ontario, Canada L4N 1 W1
(7051721-9222 Fax: (7051 734,0764
E-mail: rrobinson@rgra.ca www.rgra.on.ca
engineers
architects
planners
January 20, 2006
Mr. K. Mathieson, CRSI
Director of Engineering & Environmental Services
Township ofOro-Medonte
Box 100
148 Line 7 South
Oro, Ontario LOL 2XO
Dear Sir:
RE: Township ofOro-Medonte
MaplehiII Estates Phase lB
TSH Project No. 440-90042-53 (12)
Please find attached the revised Certificate of Maintance and Final Acceptance for the Aboveground Works
in the aforementioned development.
The aboveground works were inspected and found to be acceptable. We now recommend that the
aforementioned Certificate be issued.
If you require further information, please contact our office.
Yours very truly,
A!~-
S. Patterson, C.E.T.
SP:jd
K:\90042~53\SP Letters 2006\90042S5.doc
A ~~,,~~~~,~~~
r ~,/"""'OM,^",
\
~~
architects
planners
ANJ)~(BAIUU'!;)LTIl.
.......""""'Aln'
TOWNSHIP ENGINEERS
CERTIFICATE OF
MAINTENANCE AND FINAL ACCEPTANCE
(ABOVEGROUND WORKS)
MUNICIPALITY
Township of Oro-Medonte
PROJECT
Maplehill Estates - Phase 1B
Plan 51M-633
DEVELOPER
1091402 Ontario Ltd.
FILE NO.
12-90042-53 (MMA&H 43T-90055)
Description oUhe Works:
Roadways in the Maplehill Estates Subdivision consisting of:
. MAPLEHJLL DRIVE from Bidwell Road, north to Green Mountain Court, a distance of 362.64 metres
(1,189.76 feet).
. GREEN MOUNTAIN COURT from Maplehill Drive, west to a cul-de-sac, distance of 303.46m
(995.61 feet); and east to a cul-de-sac, a distance of 239.0m (784.12 feet); for a total length of 542.46
metres (1,779.73 feet).
We, R.G. Robinson and Associates (Barrie) Ltd. /Totten Sims Hubicki, notify the Municipality that to the
best of our knowledge and judgement:
1. The Developer named herein has completed the required maintenance work, has rectified know
deficiencies and has fulfilled the other terms of the Subdivision Agreement.
2.
The period of maintenance of this Subdivision Agreement expires on the issuance of this Certificate.
fld!J 42
/
,
20, 2.vJD t
I
Signature:
~7'
K:\90042~53\Sub. CompI\.Aboveground M. & F.e. IB.doc
~..~.
. . ,.' ~ ..;'" . ......
._.~_ ,....~...."'*...:..o:'=-. ~.!.
~ft!~..
-... - -- -
I
I
9
8
fI),~
~ ~CG'
. <:::
-
Pw.sE 1A - LOTS 1 TO 7 AND LOT 36 -8
Pw.sE 18 - LOTS 8 TO 11. 34 ac 35 AND 37 TO 56 -26
PHASE 2- lO1S 12 TO 33 AND ~ TO)I(65 -32
66 lO1S TOTAL
e
,
. c.c. TA1IWl t 'ASSOClAlD UD.
c:-. !JIgTMa
~ Pu.INI
IMPUiIILL IIII"A18S
TOWNSHIP a' 011'
~1t.5OOQ
OWG. No.
IP>H
....... UUl
\J1
DRAFT
February 1, 2006
WHEREAS Royal Victoria Hospital serves patients from Simcoe County;
AND WHEREAS the proposed expansion to Royal Victoria Hospital will provide
accessible, timely health care for current and future residents from across
Simcoe County;
AND WHEREAS the Community Partners in the funding of the expansion are the
City of Barrie, the County of Simcoe and the "I Believe" Campaign;
NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Township of Oro-Medonte unanimously
supports the expansion plans for the Royal Victoria Hospital including the Simcoe
Muskoka Regional Cancer Centre and recommends endorsement and a
commitment of financial support by Simcoe County Council for the RVH
expansion project;
AND FURTHER THAT the County of Simcoe and Royal Victoria Hospital be
advised of the Township's support.
\
\
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE MINUTES
2003-2006 TERM
January 30, 2006 @ 7:16 p.m.
Robinson Room I Council Chambers
Present:
Council Representatives
Mayor J. Neil Craig
Deputy Mayor Harry Hughes
Councillor Dan Buttineau
Councillor Ralph Hough
Councillor Paul Marshall
Councillor John Crawford
Councillor Ruth Fountain
Public Representatives
Terry Allison
Robert Barlow
Mel Coutanche
Craig Drury
John Miller
Staff Present:
Bruce Hoppe, Director of Building and Planning Services; Janette
Teeter, Clerk's Assistant
Also Present:
Frank Lepschi, Frank Pizitelli, Michelle Hughes, Eva Kroger, Charles
Style, Dianne Keene, Gary Tuck, Ian Sponagle, Dianne Johnstone,
Grace Kidd
1. Opening of Meeting by Chair.
2. Adoption of Agenda.
Motion No. P AC060130-1
Moved by Terry Allison, Seconded by Robert Barlow
It is recommended that the agenda for the Planning Advisory Committee meeting of
Monday, January 30, 2006 be received and adopted.
Carried.
3. Declaration of Pecuniary Interest and the General Nature Thereof - in
Accordance with the Act.
None declared.
4. Minutes of Previous Meetings - November 28, 2005.
Motion No. PAC060130-2
Moved by Robert Barlow, Seconded by Terry Allison
It is recommended that the minutes of the Planning Advisory Committee Meeting held on
November 28, 2005 be received and adopted.
Carried.
5. Correspondence and Communication.
a) Correspondence received January 20, 2006 from M. Fife re: TRY Recycling Ltd.
Motion No. P AC060130-3
Moved by Robert Barlow, Seconded by Terry Allison
It is recommended that the correspondence received January 20, 2006 from M. Fife: re:
Proposed Amendments to the Zoning By-Law and Proposed Plan of Subdivision 2005-
ZBA-22 and 2005-SUB-01, TRY Recycling Ltd. be received.
Carried.
6. Planning Applications
a) Planning Report presented by Bruce Hoppe, Director of Building and Planning
Services, Re: Ian Sponagle, Concession 11, West Part of Lot 17 (Oro), Township
of Oro-Medonte, Application 2006-ZBA-02.
Motion No. PAC060130-4
Moved by Craig Drury, Seconded by John Miller
It is recommended that
1. Report No. PD 2006-003, presented by Bruce Hoppe, Director of Building and
Planning Services, re: Zoning By-law Amendment for Ian Sponagle, Concession 11,
West Part of Lot 17 (Oro), Township of Oro-Medonte, 563 Line 10 North be received
and adopted.
2. That it is recommended to Council that Zoning By-law Amendment Application 2006-
ZBA-02 submitted by Ian Sponagle, West Part of Lot 17, Concession 11 (Oro),
Township of Oro-Medonte, (563 Line 10 North) proceed to a Public Meeting in
accordance with the provisions of the Planning Act.
Carried.
Planning Advisory Committee Meeting
January 30, 2006, Page 2
b) Planning Report presented by Director of Building and Planning Services, Re:
Jeffrey Gooch, East Part of Lot 10, Concession 5 (Medonte) Township of Oro-
Medonte, Application 2005-ZBA-23.
Motion No. PAC060130-5
Moved by Craig Drury, Seconded by John Miller
It is recommended that
1. Report No. BP 2006-002 presented by Bruce Hoppe, Director of Building and
Planning Services, re: Application for Rezoning - Jeffery Gooch, East Part of Lot 10,
Concession 5 (Medonte), 545 Mount St. Louis Road be received and adopted.
2. That it is recommended to Council that the application for rezoning submitted by
Jeffery Gooch, File 2005-ZBA-23, to rezone lands described as East Part of Lot 10,
Concession 5 (Medonte), Township of Oro-Medonte, to a site-specific A1RU Zone
permitting residential and accessory uses only, be supported.
3. And Further That the Clerk bring forward the appropriate by-law for Council's
consideration after such time as the development agreement has been duly
executed by the applicant and the County and registered on title.
Carried.
c) Planning Report presented by Bruce Hoppe, Director of Building and Planning
Services, Re: Laurelview Homes, Part Lots 3 and 4, Concession 4, Plan M-741.
(Oro) Township of Oro-Medonte, Application 2005-ZBA-28.
Motion No. PAC060130-6
Moved by Mel Coutanche, Seconded by Craig Drury
It is recommended that
1. Report No. BP 2006-005 presented by Bruce Hoppe, Director of Building and
Planning Services, re: Laurel View Homes Inc. Application for Rezoning for lands
located in Part Lots 3 and 4, Concession 4, Plan M-741 (Oro), Township of Oro-
Medonte be received and adopted.
2. That it is recommended to Council that Zoning By-law Amendment Application 2005-
ZBA-28 submitted by Laurel View Homes Inc. for rezoning for lands located in Part
Lots 3 and 4, Concession 4, Plan M-741 (Oro), Township of Oro-Medonte proceed to
a Public Meeting in accordance with the provisions of the Planning Act.
Carried.
Planning Advisory Committee Meeting
January 30, 2006, Page 3
7. Other Business.
a) Next PAC Meeting - Monday, February 27, 2006.
8. Adjournment.
Motion No. PAC-7
Moved by John Miller, Seconded by Craig Drury
It is recommended that we do now adjourn at 7:36 p.m.
Carried.
Chair, Mayor J. Neil Craig
Director of Building and Planning
Services, Bruce Hoppe
Planning Advisory Committee Meeting
January 30, 2006, Page 4
_I
f
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF ORO-MEDONTE
BY-LAW NO. 2006-008
Being a By-law to re-zone certain lands within Part of Lot 15, Concession 8,
Blocks 65-66, Registered Plan 51 M-679 (Medonte), Township of Oro-Medonte
from the Residential One "Rl (H)" Zone
to the Residential One Exception "Rl (H)*165" Zone (Bachly)
WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte is
empowered to pass By-laws to regulate the use of land pursuant to Section 34 of the
Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.P.13.
AND WHEREAS Council deems it appropriate to rezone the subject lands;
AND WHEREAS the passage of such a by-law wili conform to the Official Plan;
NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte
enacts as follows:
1. Schedule 'A24' to Zoning By-law No. 97-95 as amended, is hereby further
amended by rezoning those lands located in Part of Lot 15, Concession 8,
Blocks 65-66, Registered Plan 51 M-679 (Medonte) from the Residential One
"R1 (H)'" Zone to the Residential One Exception "R1 (H)*165" Zone as shown on
Schedule 'A' attached hereto and forming part of this By-law.
2. Section 7 EXCEPTIONS is hereby amended by adding a new clause subsection
7.165 as follows:
"7.165
*165 - Part Lot 15, Concession 8. Blocks 65-66, Reg. Plan 51M-679
(Medonte)
Notwithstanding the other provisions in this By-iaw, the following
provisions apply to the lands denoted by the symbol *165 on the
schedules to this By-law:
a) Minimum lot area
b) Setbacks
1860 square metres
The minimum setback for structures
from the original centreline of County
Road 19 shall be 26 metres or 10.7
metres from the property line, whichever
is greater. This setback shall not apply
to accessory building without a
permanent foundation."
3. This By-law shall come into effect upon the date of passage hereof, subject to
the provisions of the Planning Act, as amended.
BY-LAW READ A FIRST AND SECOND TIME THIS 1ST DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2006.
BY-LAW READ A THIRD TIME AND FINALLY PASSED THIS
2006.
DAY OF
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
Mayor, J. Neil Craig
Clerk, Marilyn Pennycook
llo
Schedule 'A' to By-Law No.
2006-008
This is Schedule 'A' to By-Law 2006-008
passed the day of P
Mayor
J. Neil Craig ~
N
Clerk
Marilyn pennycook
Will Lands subject to the rezoning.
Township of Oro-Medonte
ILPb
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
BY-LAW NO. 2006-010
Being a By-Law to Amend By-law No. 2004-028
To Authorize a Decrease in the Speed Limit on Certain Roads
Within the Township of Oro-Medonte
WHEREAS the Highway Traffic Act, R.S.a., 1990, Chapter H.8, as amended, Section
128(2), authorizes the Council of a municipality to pass By-laws to prescribe a lower
rate of speed for motor vehicles on a highway or portion of highway under its
jurisdiction;
AND WHEREAS it is deemed necessary and expedient that the speed limit for motor
vehicles on certain portions of highways under the jurisdiction of the Township of Oro-
Medonte be decreased;
AND WHEREAS the Council of The Township of Oro-Medonte did, on the 16th day of
June, 2004 enact By-law No. 2004-028 to decrease the speed limit on certain roads
within the Township of Oro-Medonte;
NOW THEREFORE the Council of The Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte
hereby enacts as follows:
1. THAT Schedule "C" of By-law No. 2004-028 be amended to add as follows:
Name of Highway From To
7 Line 4 North Countv Road #19 Mount SI. Louis Road
2. THAT this By-law shall come into force and take effect on its final passing
thereof.
BY-LAW READ A FIRST AND SECOND TIME THIS 1ST DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2006.
BY-LAW READ A THIRD TIME AND FINALLY PASSED THIS
2006.
DAY OF
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
Mayor, J. Neil Craig
Clerk, Marilyn Pennycook
Il
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
BY.LAW NO. 2006-009
BEING A BY-LAW TO CONFIRM THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE
COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 1, 2006
THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. THAT the action of the Council at its Council Meeting held on Wednesday,
February 1, 2006, and in respect to each Motion, Resolution and other actions
passed and taken by the Council at its said Meeting is, except where prior approval
of the Ontario Municipal Board is required, hereby adopted, ratified and confirmed.
2. THAT the Mayor and the proper Officials 01 the Township are hereby authorized and
directed to do all things necessary to give effect to the said action or to obtain
approvals where required and to execute all documents as may be necessary on
behalf of the Council of the Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte. And, the
Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to allix the corporate seal to all said
documents.
BY-LAW READ A FIRST AND SECOND TIME THIS 1st DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2006.
BY-LAW READ A THIRD TIME AND FINALLY PASSED THIS 1" DAY OF
FEBRUARY, 2006.
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
Mayor, J. Neil Craig
Clerk, Marilyn Pennycook