Loading...
10 24 2005 P134/02 Public Agenda NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING \ FOR PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING BY -LAW OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE P-134/02 TAKE NOTICE that the Council of the Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte will hold a Public Meeting on Monday, October 24, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. in the Municipal Council Chambers. The purpose of the public meeting is to obtain public comments on a proposed amendment to the Zoning By-law. under Section 34 of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990 c. P. 13. THE PURPOSE of the Zoning By-law Amendment would be to rezone the lands described as Concession 7, East Part of Lot 1 (formerly within the Township of Oro). The subject lands are currently zoned AgriculturalfRural (AfRU) and Environmental Protection (EP). The applicant is applying to re-zone the lands from the AfRU and EP Zones to an Agricultural/Rural Exception (AfRU*) Zone to permit a site specific use. The uses proposed as part of the application are the storage, restoration, and sale of used military equipment (Jeeps) and related parts. A KEY MAP illustrating the location of the subject lands is provided below. ANY PERSON may attend the public meeting and/or make written or verbal representation either in support of or in opposition to the proposed Amendment.. If a person or public body that files an appeal of a decision of the Township of Oro-Medonte in respect of the proposed Amendment does not make oral submission at the public meeting or make written submissions to the Township before the proposed Amendment are adopted, the Ontario Municipal Board may dismiss all or part of the appeal. If you wish to be notified of the decision of the Township of Oro-Medonte in respect to the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment, you must make a written request to the address below. WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS should be directed to: Township of Oro-Medonte 148 Line 7 South P.O. Box 100, Oro, Ontario LOL 2XO Attn: Marilyn Pennycook, Clerk ADDITIONAL INFORMATION relating to the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment is available for inspection between 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. at the Township of Oro-Medonte Administration Building. For further information, contact the Planning Department at 705-487-2171. DATED at the Township of Oro-Medonte this 30th day of September 2005. ~ iC~ Bruce Hoppe, MClP, RPP Director of Planning 100 0 l00MelefS ,,,.., I ~-\~'ft \ . 0 (' 0N\.Lb~ .~~.\i 5;G~' ) 7/6::'/ --f' / 17 .! /} -..Jo tV.' V77U.. ",/r cfh (l.n itl, rn ;;;;: /0.-1- ~40 a n d./ie. ~ , ;P ,:-'I" /h~ Jr :;/ ct:~A)-\rt"j~.nX:. (~rf!71~-' ~ /~" A:::7~ /U. ;;:-.+01. / / ':" ..-/ ( ,. /' - i '-7,/ -4-:- ff. 1'":-1 /.f~ (! ----1" j, / 1/ 1I(/w _ ,,)-, tV.ef.(&::::-. ~ ~h/~~t. ~ ~~~ f?~ ~l /ZJ YJ ..lL . /; /, / /!J LI( LJ '1-1-1-' /; ( ~.z::,.u a ' ((/yJ,r . Ac'){ / ::=(j /<fAj~/q(' '-" 17 ! ~cA ' l '~i/V~<.....A- !' / l x'. / iA j //1>;]/ OCT 2 0 2005 ORO-MEDONTE ~ HIP N ( NATIONAL ~ARKETING (1959) LTD. 1202 Basslake Sideroad West RR 1, Shanty Bay, ON LOL 21..0 October 12th, 2005 IRECEIV-rD I I OCT 1 7 2005 ! ORO-MEDONTE TOWNSHIP Township ofOro-Medonte 148 Line 7 South P.O. Box 100, Oro, Ontario LOL 2XO Attn: Marilyn Pennycook, Clerk Subiect: Proposed Amendment to the Zoning By-Law for lands on Concession 7 East Part of Lot 1 Dear Ms Pennycook, We are fIrmly opposed to a zoning amendment to permit the establishment of an industrial-type operation as described in the application for zoning amendment dated September 30th, 2005, This area of Oro-Medonte is now mainly agricultural and quickly changing to up-scale residential- not industrial land. Yours truly, W.O. President ~ Simcoe County District School Board 1170 Highway 26 West Midhurst. Ontario lOl1XO Phone: (705) 728-7570 Fax: (705) 728-2265 www.scdsb.on.ca I RECEIVITil II OCT 1 4 1005 I ORO-MEOONTE TOWNSHIP October 12, 2005 Mr. Bruce Hoppe, MCIP, RPP Director of Planning Township of Oro-Medonte 148 Line 7 South P.O. Box 100 Oro, ON LOL 2XO FILE NO, P-134/02 Dear Mr. Hoppe: ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT 3224 LINE 7 NORTH PART LOT I, CONCESSION 7 (ORO) TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE Thank you for circulating Notice of the Public Meeting for the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment for the above-noted property to this office. The amendment proposes to rezone the property to an Agricultural/Rural Exception (A/RU*) Zone to permit a site-specific use. The uses proposed include the storage, restoration, and sale of used military equipment (Jeeps) and related parts. Elementary students residing in this area may attend Guthrie Public School and secondary students will be bussed to Orillia Park Street Collegiate, Should you require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Yours truly, 1141i~- Holly Spacek, MClP, RPP Planning Officer , . \ \ ( 'Q., I RECEIVED I ~OCT 1 7 2005 i ORO-MEDONTE TOWNSHIP 3267 Line 7 N. R. R. #2, Oro Station, LOL 2EO, October 17,2005. Township ofOro-Medonte, 148 Line 7 South, P. O. Box 100, Oro, Ontario, LOL 2XO. To Mayor Craig and Members of Council, I wish to express my opposition to the proposed amendment to the lands described as Concession 7, East Part of Lot 1 (formerly in the Township ofOro) from Agricultural/Rural and Environmental Protection to Agricultural/Rural Exception Zone, to permit a site specific use (storage, restoration, and sale of used military equipment and parts. I object to this rezoning on the grounds that this use is not an agricultural/rural use and it is out of character with the land uses in the surrounding area, It would turn what was a beautiful rural area into a used car lot and auto body shop, next to an environmentally sensitive area bordered by a large, natural pond. I feel that this rezoning could result in expansion of this operation over the entire property. As it is, I believe it has already devalued the surrounding properties, as it looks like a large auto wreckers/scrapyard, Rezoning would legitimize in perpetuity the illegitimate land use that is currently taking place, Would you want this next door to you? I hope Council will take into consideration the precedent this rezoning would set for future land uses in environmentally sensitive areas. Please notify me of the decision of the Township ofOro-Medonte in respect to this proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment Thank you, Norman S. NewelL _~~t-20~05 01:31P K.J.BEAMISH CONST.CO.LTD. 705 726 8072 P.OI Lc9 ~ \ Con ( ROGER AND EVA GRAHAM 83 HORSESHOE V ALLEY ROAD WEST R.R. # 4. COLDW A TER. ONTARIO, LOK I EO (705) 1135-5676 FAX (705) 835-}56I DATE: OCTOBER 20, 2005 FAX TRANSMITfAL TO: TOWNSHIP OF ORO - MEDONTE FAX NUMBER: (705) 487-0133 ATfENT/ON. MARILYN peNNYCOCK, CLERK RE : REZONING APPLICATION P-123102 NUMBER SHEETS SENT INCLUDING TRANSMITI AL PAGE: 2 SF-NT BY : ROGER V GRAHAM COMlVlENTS : ATfACHED IS OUR OUR WRITfEN OPPOSITION TO THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT. DATED OCTOBER 20, 2005 . IN ADDITION, WE WOULD LIKE TO BE ADDED TO THE AGENDA. FOR MONDAY'S COUNCIL MEETING, PERTAINING TOTIIlS APPLICATION. ENABLING US TO PRESENT ADDITIONAl. INFORMATION AND ANSWER QUESTIONS nIAT MAY BE RAtSED . COPIES TO: BRUCE HOPPE - TOWNSHIP OF ORO -MEDONTE -FAX (705) 487.(!I:B GARFIELD DUNLOP - M,P.P. - FAX (705) 326-9579 SYLVIA ANDERSON - NOTf A W ASGA V ALLEY CONSER v A TlON AUTHORITY - FAX (705) 424-2115 Q~t-20;05 01:31P K.J.BEAMISH CONST.CO.LTD. 705 726 8072 P.02 Roger and Eva Graham 83 Horseshoe Valley Road West R..R. 4, Coldwater. ON, LOK lEO Date: October 20, 2005 To: Corporation of the Township of Oro--Medonte, 148 Une 7 South, P.O. Box 100, Oro, Ontario LOL2XO Altn: Marilyn Pennycook. Clerk RE: Application for Rezoning P-134102. ElISl Part of Lot 1, Concession 7, (Oro) 3224 Line 7 Nonh File No: 2951 We would like to register our opposltlon to the proposed amendment. 1) The proposed rezoning as defined to permit: "outdoor stoR/ge, repairs, restoration & s81e of military jeePs, equipment and pans" is no different than conducting any auto repair and mechanical storage operation on the property. This use directly contravenes By Law 97-95 for home industry usage It is our feeling that this business is not in compliance with the existing rural nature of the surrounding area, and negatively impacts the desirabUity and value of adjacent properties, An approval of this activity by council would serve to further expand this activity and further promote devaluation, 2) The property is also designated as "lOP', environmentally protected. We maintain that an approval of the proposed activity on this site would be an approval of unnatural 'development' hazardous to this protected designation, In a recent published study of the Oro Moraine. Oro Madonte council states: "the protection of the environment shBlI tB1ce precedence over devs/opment. T11e focus of the new poIk:18s is to protect ecoIogicBlle8tures and functions and the function of the Oro Morsine as a major recharge area white directlflg devetopmefll to appropriate loCtJtlons ~ Therefore we feel il is the responsibility of Council to follow their mandate to protect this 'EP' property designation. It should be noted that there are existing adjacent lots :wned as "EP', harboring a large spring fed pond and designated .wildlife sanctuary' and "managed forest". The inevitable leaching of hazardous matarials including gasoline, oils, radiator fluids. etc. Into the watershed and their obvious detrimental effects should not be Ignored. 3) An existing use of the property indudes the occasional hosting of 'war games' and the rental and testing on site of large and small artillery, munitions and automatic weaponry, This is disturbing 10 us as neighbors, frightens our seniors and grandchildren, panicS the wildlife on the pond and in the forest, and is not something that we would want approved as permissible activity in a residential area. 4) As a recent precedent in Oro, a farm on the 3'. Line just North of the Old Barrie Road (across from #2072and adjacent to #2129) whiCh was in the business involving the outdoor storage. repair, restoration and sale of wood palettes was shut down by Council. In Ihis case, Council sel Ihe precedent refusing to allow this activity on the property. We maintain Ihat in the proposed application, the activity is equally if not more unsightly and the materials (metals, oil, gas, etc) far more unfavoreble and hazardous 10 the environment. 5) As mentioned in the Township Report. #PD2005-052 the SUbmitted survey sketch. originally requested in March of 2004, Is not acceptable as it does not shOw all "the required information as set out in Section 41 of the planning act~ Therefore we feel that since it is not an accurate reflection of the full impact of the planned activity, it cannot be used by Council to make an approval of the application. Please inform us of the outcome of this application, Thank You. ~ (:) {~4.J.-_ RogerV. Graham Eva Young-Graham " "1 \ (~ Oct. 21,2005 Corporation of the Township ofOro-Medonte 148 Line 7 South P.O. Box 100 Oro, Ontario LOL 2XO Attention: Marilyn Pennycook, Clerk Re: Application for Resoning P-134/02 East Part of Lot 1, Cone. 7, #3224 Line 7 N Please accept this letter and photos of the said property as our formal opposition to the rezoning application. (1) It is our understanding that before an EP designation is removed, a completed Environmental Assessment study must be nndertaken. On Nov. 3, 2004 PAC requested further information from the applicant. Why was an environmental assessment not requested at that time? As per photo #1 the property in question is outlined in pen. Notice the pond/springs/marshy area is immediatley adjacent to and becomes part of said property. (2) Though zoned agrieculturaVEP, and though several building permits on the subject property were granted under the auspices of agricultural use, the aerial photograph clearly shows the land is not in fact used for agricultural purposes. The planning department of Oro Medonte was gravely misled by the applicant. (3) The applicant is trying to legalize what has, in fact, been a misuse ofland for commercial useage- as is visible in many photos (#2,#3,#4) taken from concession 7. Photos indicate quantities of trailers, transport trailers, tractor trailers, military gas cans, military parts and jeeps strewn all over the property, including being buried in bushes immediately to the south of the house, amongst a further compound of military equipment (#5). (4) Aside from existing large structures (barn #9, garage # 10), the applicant has built 3 additional structures: compound area (#6), red-roofbuilding(#7) and a large white canvas covered structure (#8). Despite the fact that these buildings exist, military equipment is littered everywhere, This useage is an eye sore for the neighbourhood and has been for many years. (5) PAC never addressed the sound that this existing/proposed useage creates. On Nov 3, 2004, why did PAC not ask the applicant to have a Sound Study undertaken? (6) As you can see in photo #4, large areas of the property have been stripped of topsoil and filled in with a compact granular material preventing normal drainage. Has the applicant ever been asked to address Storm Water Run-OfflManagement and why was this not requested by the planning department? This property drains toward the pond and springs on the adjacent property. , , This is of major environmental concern considering gas, oil, radiator fluid and other contaminants are all part of parking lot run off. (7) The applicant currently has numerous road access points to his property. Are these acceses regulated by the township as to number and size? If this venture is permitted and continues to grow, should a Traffic Study not be conducted? (8) The applicant repairs/stores motor vehicles. As per By-Law 97-95, the applicant should not be permitted to continue the misuse of this land nor be allowed to transform his illegal deeds into legal useage by re-zoning. (9)The applicant appears to have been very successful in running his operation as it has grown continuously. If current useage continues or is permitted, land value of adjacent properties will also be affected. As is clearly evident, this operation belongs in a commercial/industrial site where traffic, noise, storm water run-off and environmental concerns have already been addressed. Thank you for your time and consideration of this submission. Vera Cameron van Arnelsvoort Gerry van Arnelsvoort 27 Horseshoe Valley Rd. East R,R.#2 Oro Station, Ont. LOL 2EO OCT-24-2005 10:33 FROM:NUCA 7054242115 TO: 17054870133 P.1/1 Member Municipalities Artji4la-TosOfQntio Am<lr:lI1lh B.;'lrrif' lit(' Olut: MOUI'ltJins Bfadiord-Wc;~1 GwHlinibllry Clp.:nvln,v CI)j]in~)N(I(ld t5~.; Inni~fll MelarKlhol' MIl!lO Mulmur Nt.w Te(um<;~h Oro-Medontf'. GrC'y High!~ind~ SIH:::lblll ne Spn ngwi.'llc'r W~~iRa rkOlLh Watershed Counties Silllt.UC {JuiCerlll Cn-y Member of ~ c.on!>ervation ONTARIO ",.,,,,;'/C'WIIp/1:>il, ~j\A,r . 'q \ " ~~ October 24, 2005 Marilyn Pennycook, Clerk Township of Oro-Medonte Box 100 Oro, Ontario, LOL 2XO Dear Ms. Pennycook: Re: Proposed Amendment to the zoning By-law PI. Lot 1, Concession 7 (Formerly Oro) Township of Oro-Medonte File Number: P.134/02 The Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority has reviewed this application in accordance with Natural Heritage and Natural Hazard policies established under the Provincial Policy Statement. The NVCA recommends deferral of the application at this time. As you may be aware, part of the property is located within the provincially Significant West Coulson Swamp. The Provincial Policy Statement states that development and site alteration shall not be permitted within Provincially Significant wetlands and therefore we believe the wetland should remain in an Environmental Protection zoning. Though the NVCA has no objection to the area currently utilized for storage and restoration of vehicles which is outside of the wetland and the floodplain, we believe the area permitting this use should be limited through zoning. Further expansion of the operation should be deferred until an Environmental Impact Statement has been produced which demonstrates the expanded use will have no negative impacts on the environmental features and functions of the area. Areas critical to the protection of environmental features and functions. as well as any floodplain or erosion hazard areas, should be placed into an Environmental Protection zoning. It should be noted that our comments reflect the intent of Natural Heritage and Natural Hazard policies of the Provincial Policy Statement. We also note a significant part of the property has been included within the Greeniands designation of the County of Simcoe Official Plan, Thank you for circulating this application and please forward a copy of your decision. Sincerely, --- /~'1"~ Tim Salkeld, Resource Planner Conserving our Healthy Waters NOT1AWASACA VALLEY CONSERVATION AUTHOI-:I rv Celltre for ConsclVation John Hix Con~p.rV;:iti{)n ^dmini:.trilliUII (enlre '" Tif(jn Com.e-NOlli"n ArE""" 8195 mh LinE~ Utopi".. ()n I OM 1Tu Tele.l'hootl: 7Wi.414.147lJ .." Fax: 705.414...H 15 ;: Wp.h: W'\II/W.r1Vt..<t.UIl.LU Email' :\dmini!!'nvni.on.( <I 10/24/0507;19 FAX 905 469 3915 ,.--............--..- ..---'---.. PETRO-C~~ ~XEC CRBC1 ~001 , \ (en - I Ol.O~S\-\: I P oF (9Ro - ('f\ E.Do,.J TE- A-"ll~ : MR.. 5l2.u<:..e... 14-0 ~ o 100F~.:rt>lZ- ~ PL..A,J,J I~ . A1IA~ lS /'A.'" I-f..T~ 10 6E €. NIE;J2..2D 1,.,)1 t:> THE- IY\I.J I,,)Ti:.S 01= T~ f\'\l:.E:ii~ lO~llE... /'f\c.JGA-( ~ ,J.4-(oS ec... II+€- ~Z/;).J,,x;. ~ 1uE... LA...JD Co.J c.f.SS' oJ 7 E,A.sf ~Ae:r oF LoI.jL I ~'(I"" ~'-.l .,., . \ IY\ l~~ ~::)\~0l0X:r 4-\ ~g::.~\:i.,e:. VAuX-i ~o w R. R.:ll 4- Uu:> wt\\E:.f2- 10/24/05 07:19 FAX 905 469 3915 _~--L-___._'",,----- -" ,,-'" .;>J'TRO-CAN EXEC CRBC1 1i!I002 Township of Oro-Medonte To Mayor Craig and the Members of Council Re: Concession 7, East - Part of Lot 1 (Formerly in the Township ofOro) We wish to oppose the application to re-zone the land from the A/RU and EP Zones to an AgricultutaIlRural Exception (AlRU*) Zone to permit a site specific use as storage, restoration and sale ofusro military equipment and related part;;. We currently own the land adjacent to this proposed rezoning and raise objections to this new application as well as his current use of the property. We have taken great care and expense over the 40+ years to try and protect our large, environmenUllly sensitive, natural pond to protect what little wildlife we have left in this area. This is, and we woUld like it to continue, to be a wildlife sanctuary. This pond is also the first in a line of ten others which could potentially be affected by pollution seeping into the water table. . , Because of the nature of his business the equipment is constantly being tested (not just Jeeps) the resulting noise levels and frequency are proving to be a huge Source of irritation to ourselves and surrounding neighbors. If the business were expanded in this way it could only lead to an increase of noise and disruption to the local popullrtion and to the wildlife we try so hard to protect. We are also concerned about the disposal of the existing pollutants in the form of oil and other hazardous waste protects in the existing business being so close to the un4ergrOlmd natural springs, ' A large added concern would be the devaluation of properties in our surroundillg area, if what is already an eyesore, is permitted to expand. Please notify us of the decision to this proposed Zoning By-Law Amendment Yours truly, ~dJ h" Michael and Cindy Armstrong 2207 Vista Drive Burlington, Ontario L7M 3N4 4-1 ~7-Sl-loL IJAuE..'I eo w . 1<l2..!\.. 4- c.0l1)~A-\E.R. (WT. Early Snow Page I of2 Bruce Hoppe From: Pat &Em Woodford strix.woodfordii@sympatico.ca] Sent: Sunday, October 23,20057:15 AM To: Bruce Hoppe Subject: Early Snow.doc \ cd. ; Report PD2005-052 Submission to Oro-Medonte Council Bruce - Your Morning Smile Jim 24 Oct 2005 7.00pm In my opinion Report PD2005-052 did not present a balanced picture of what this application involves to the Planning Advisory Committee and it does not present a balanced picture to CounciL It is asking that the "A/RU' and "EP" zone be changed to an "A/RU" exception zone. There is not one word about the Environmental Protection Zone in the Report, There should have been a detailed summary of why this area was zoned EP and what scientific data there is to justify changing this classification. There is no map showing the EP zone, Attachment 3 showing the house and buildings leaves the area to the west, where the EP zone is located, blank, There is a large building not shown on Attachment 3, The Report should be revised by the Director of Planning to include data on the Environmental Protection Area and a map showing its location, Then the revised Report should be sent back to the Planning Advisory Committee for a new vote. On page I it reads, "The uses proposed.. ,are the storage, restoration and sale of used military equipment (j ) " eeps .... Mr. MacDonald have you ever visited this property? There are large army trucks, trailers, and a flatbed to haul a tank, three I 8-wheeler trailers. 1 have seen ambulances, personnel carriers and other trucks on the property. I question your rationalization of this operation as a "home industry", My hero the late Winston Churchill might have commented: "Some home! Some industry!" I've always thought of a "home industry" as a weaver, potter or woodworker. You were paid hundreds of thousands of tax dollars to write the Official Plan and hundreds of thousands more to revise it. As an ethical professional planner I would think you should be defending your plan. Planning reports to the Planning Advisory Committee and Council should be objective. They should clearly layout the possible benefits and negative consequences of the application. This has not been the case. In 10 years I cannot remember a balanced planning report. For example look at the Report on the proposed Moon Point development. 10/24/2005 Early Snow Page 2 of2 Mayor Craig -I've read in the Packet and Times how proud you are about Oro-Medonte's "Environment First" policy - so if you really believe in this policy you should vote against this application. I recognize Mr. MacDonald's planning experience- but it is time for a new era of planning in my Township, Council hired a new highly qualified and experienced planner and it is time he prepared all planning reports for Council - as is done in most municipalities in Ontario - for example Simcoe County. Mayor Craig and Councillors] respectfully request that Council pass whatever is needed to assure that all future reports on proposed developments and zoning changes are prepared by the Director of Planning and his staff. Jim Woodford Friend ofthe West Coulson Swamp 10/24/2005 The Corporation of the County of Simcoe ENGINEERING COUNTY OF SIMCOE 7 ORO MEDONTE ,-;\~\\,. 'It \ Co('~~ NO. 772 "02 10/24/2005 14:48 ci :l (70S) 726-9300 Fax: (70S) 727-7984 E-mail: roads@counry.simcce.on.ca QV CORPORATE SERVICES DEPARTMENT TRANSPORTA nON DMSION 1110 Highway 26 Administration Centre Midh=t; Ontario LOL lXO October 24, 2005 File No. D14-OM-05 Mr. B. Hoppe Township of Oro-Medonte 148 Line 7 South Oro, Ontario LOL 2X0 Dear Mr. Hoppe; Re: Application 1134/02 3224 Line 7 Thank you for circulating the above noted application to the County of Simcoe for review. Staff understands the application is to permit the re-zoning of the s\lbject property from Agricull.UIallRural & Environmental Protection to Agricultural/Rural Exception to permit the service, restoration and sales of vehicles. The subject property has frontage on Line 7 with a side yard frontage on County Road 22. To ensure the development of the property conforms to County requirements for development atljacent to a County Road, the Transportation and Engineering Division requests the development of the above noted property be subject to site plan control. In the event the Township is not considering site plan control the County will require the applicant to submit a conceptual plan to the satisfaction of the County of Simcoe, prior to approval of the application. In accordance with Section 4.11 of the County of Simcoe Official Plan, this application is also subject to all other applicable Provincial, County and Local policies and by-laws. Please forward a copy of the decision to the County of Simcoe. If you require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned, Sincerely, J.&tw S. Beattie Engineering/Planning Technician Transportation &. Engineering Division ~\C'mpmnSrnolcC3\PllUlllltlsl,QlI~dllpfllcnt COI~d<0r0-Mcdcm~\P]34.0S.Sdtl)Cidcr.dat 10/24/2005 14:48 ENGINEERING COUNTY OF SIMCOE 7 ORO MEDONTE NO.772 [;101 FACSIMILE CORPORATE SERVICES DEPARTMENT TRANSPORTATION DIVISION Administration Centre 1110 Highway 26 Mldhurst, Ontario Telephone: Fax: Customer Service: 705-726-9300 705-727-7984 705-735-6901 or 1.800-263-3199 COUNTY OF SIMCOE To: IJNJel IitrIJI1J From: S. Beattie Date: Od .,n:Jm/i Fax: Oraanlzation: 8e: PI3LJ /()J Total Pages including this Cover Page: :J Comments: CONFIDENTIAL COMMUNICATION ll1e_ ~ Ie inIllndad for uaeOn!ybyll18_ sot out_ "~oUld IlOIllereedllr, ordl8tllbllllld III any_ -- -.-... ""'lI comaln pllv/leglol or ccnftdenllal InIoI1llallOn. ll1e CllllClOIIUIll or ...... uae of whIellllr _ ..... \Il8 l_l'llCIplllnt"",yl'ClBU" In... b_ of _law Of ilia InltlnQlmOnlot ~gMe ot..11O pa_ and moy_legalImpU_1O "0 eo..nl)< of SI...... _1llIl_ If you have received this teiecopy In error, please notify us ImmedlBtely by calling our office at 705-726-9300 and destroy the received teleCOPV.