06 22 2005 COW Agenda
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING AGENDA
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
DATE: WEDNESDAY, JUNE 22,2005
TIME: 9:00 a.m.
1. NOTICE OF ADDITIONS TO AGENDA
2. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA
3. DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST AND THE GENERAL NATURE
THEREOF: - "IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ACT"
4. DEPUTATIONS:
a) 9:00 a.m.
b) 9:10 a.m.
c) 9:20 a.m.
d) 9:40 a.m.
Peter Hill, Try-Recycling Inc.; Kris Menzies, MHBC Planning Limited rei Try-
Recycling Inc., Business Venture [brochure under separate cover].
Lori Hunter, Simcoe Muskoka District Health Unit rei Simcoe County
Healthy Living Strategy [brochure under separate cover].
Sue Martin, Gaviller & Company LLP rei 2004 Audited Financial Report.
S/Sgt. Ed Whinnery, Detachment Commander, Barrie Detachment, O.P.P.,
rei Oro-Medonte Policing Costs.
5. CORRESPONDENCE:
a) Ian Brown, Habitat for Humanity, correspondence dated May 17, 2005; rei September
22, 2005 Golf Tournament.
b) Ginny Myles, correspondence dated June 8, 2005 rei Old Barrie Road Through Edgar.
c) Dalton McGuinty, The Premier of Ontario, correspondence dated June 7, 2005 rei
Long-Term Viability of Farmers.
d) Gayle Wood, CAO-Secretary-Treasurer, Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority,
response to Mr. Woodford's correspondence of May 27,2005.
e) Jim Woodford, correspondence received June 16,2005 rei deputation to the Board of
the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority.
6. FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND FIRE:
a) Report No. ADM 2005-024, Jennifer Zieleniewski, CAO, rei Township of Oro-Medonte
Policies for Human Resources Department.
b) Report No. TR 2005-12, Paul Gravelle, Treasurer, rei Banking Services Renewal and
Options [on desk].
c) Report No. TR 2005-13, Paul Gravelle, Treasurer, rei Insurance Service Renewal [on
desk].
7. PUBLIC WORKS:
a) Report No. PW 2005-08, Jerry Ball, Public Works Superintendent, rei Line 15 North -
Community Safety Zone [deferred from May 25, 2005].
b) Report No. PW 2005-09, Jerry Ball, Public Works Superintendent, rei Salt Management
Plan.
8. ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES:
None.
9. BUILDING, PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT:
a) Minutes of Public Meeting, June 13, 2005, rei Proposed Amendment Zoning By-Law,
2005-ZBA-10, Concession 13, Part of Lot 13, (Medonte), Township of Oro-Medonte
[Bell].
b) Minutes of Public Meeting, June 13, 2005, rei Proposed Amendment Zoning By-Law,
2005-ZBA-11, Concession 6, East Part of Lot 2, (Medonte), Township of Oro-Medonte
[Woodrow].
c) Minutes of Planning Advisory Committee Meeting, June 13, 2005.
d) Report No. PD 2004-040, Bruce Hoppe, Director of Planning, rei Zoning By-Law
Amendment for Donald Woodrow, Concession 6, East Part of Lot 2 (Medonte),
Township of Oro-Medonte.
e) Report No. PD 2004-041, Bruce Hoppe, Director of Planning, rei Zoning By-Law
Amendment for Don & Helen Bell, Concession 13, West Part of Lot 13 (Medonte),
Township of Oro-Medonte.
f) Report No. PD 2005-036, Nick McDonald, Planning Consultant, rei Moon Point - Part
of Lots 15 and 16, Concession 3 (Orillia), Applications 2004-SUB-01, 2004-0PA-02,
and 2004-ZBA-09.
g) Committee of Adjustment, minutes of June 16,2005 meeting.
2
10. IN-CAMERA:
a) Jennifer Zieleniewski, CAO, rei Legal Matter.
b) Jennifer Zieleniewski, CAO, rei Personnel Matter.
c) Jennifer Zieleniewski, CAO, rei Personnel Matter.
11. ADJOURNMENT:
3
ADDENDUM
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING
Wednesday, June 22, 2005
5. CORRESPONDENCE:
f) John E. Anderson, Warden, 8t. Thomas' Church, correspondence dated June 19,
2005 re: Village Green Equipment.
g) Pearl Guthrie, petition dated May 21, 2005 re: Canada Goose Population at Oro
Memorial Park.
l.
Tamara Obee
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Kevin Anderson [kevin_anderson@sympatico.ca]
Tuesday, June 21, 2005 12:42 PM
Marilyn pennycook
Jennifer Zieleniewski; Bruce Hoppe; Neil Craig; nick@meridianplan.ca
RE: Moon Point
Attention:
Marilyn Pennycook
I apologize for my error: however, I would respectively ask that Council consider waiving
the procedural by-law in order to allow the owner's solicitor, Mr. Michael Melling five
minutes to speak in regard to the application.
Regards,
Kevin Anderson
Project Manager
The TayJak Group on behalf of
Moonpoint corporation
-----Original Message-----
From: Marilyn pennycook [mailto:clerk@oro-medonte.ca]
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 10:11 AM
To: Kevin Anderson
Cc: Jennifer Zieleniewski; Bruce Hoppe; Neil Craig; nick@meridianplan.ca
Subject: RE: Moon Point
Mr. Anderson,
Unfortunately, your request to be listed on the agenda for the Committee of the Whole
meeting of June 22 did not meet the requirements of Council's procedural by-law. Requests
must be received four working days prior to the meeting. You may put forward a written
request that Committee consider waiving the procedural by-law to hear your deputation.
This request would be put to a vote of Committee at the meeting.
Marilyn pennycook
Clerk
-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Anderson [mailto:kevin_anderson@sympatico.ca]
Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 1:18 PM
To: Marilyn Pennycook
Cc: Bruce Hoppei Neil Craigi Jennifer zieleniewski; 'Nick McDonald'
Subject: RE: Moon Point
Attention: Marilyn Pennycook, Town Clerk
We would respectively request that we be provided time to present a deputation in regard
to the Moon Point Application on wednesday June 22, 2005.
Regards,
Kevin Anderson
Project Manager for
Moon Point Corporation
~
341 Talbot 51., Suite 230
" London, ON N6A 2R5
TeL (519) 457-1566
fax (519) 858-4171
~~
June 10, 2005
Mayor and Members of Council
ToWnship ofOro-Medonte
148 Line 7 South
Oro, Ontario LOL 2XO
Dear Mayor Craig and members of Council:
TRY Recycling proposes to establish a new business in your municipality that will create
employment, contribute to the economy and provide an environmental service to recycle
materials that -traditionally end up in land fill sites.
Our objective is to start a business that will employ 10 people initially and could grow to 30
people in a nJ.'ature operlltion. We anticipate an initial expenditure of $500,000 for site works
and capital expendItures. On going we would have $700,000 per year as salaries and
operating costs plus $800,000 in purchases of outside services. .
The enclosed material gives you an insight into our business. We are passionate about
recycling and diverting recyclables from landfill while striving to be a good neighbour and
,participate in the community. '.
Adjacent to our London facility we created a 23 acre eco-park that was officially opened by
Gord Miller, Ontario's Environmental Commission~r. Since its opening other groups have
participated like Home Depot that donated $100,000 in playground equipment.
Our entire team gets involved in the community where we support:
Youth Opportunities Unlimited
Gail Graham Eco Park
L.ondon Composts
London's Curbside Food Drive
St. Leonard's Sm,(iety
Compost Day
Grow a Row Program
Thames River Ecological Association
Boys and Girls Club of Windsor
Make a Wish Foundation, London
Clean and Green, London
Habitat Re-Use
Friends of the Coves
London Boys & Girls Club
We also contract with Goodwill Industries to hire seasonal labour from them to support these
challenged individuals.
www.tryrecycling.com
,?
.
Inc
We do get some recognition such as:
. 2004 runner up for the London Chamber of Commerce small business of the year
award
. 2003 winner of the London Chamber of Commerce Business Achievement
Environmental Award for outstanding achievement and leadership
. 2001 Ethics in Action Socially Responsible Decision Making Award
. 1999 Finalist in the Recycling Council of Canada's Ontario Waste Minimization
Award
We are also active in our industry to improve the standards for recycling. We are on an
advisory committee within the Ministry of the Environment tasked with achieving the waste
diversion targets. We are on the Board of Directors of the Compost Council of Canada. TRY
is also a member of the Association of Municipal Recyclers, Recycling Coordinators of
Ontario and the Municipal Waste IntegrationNetwork.
The Minister of the Environment was interested in our recycling business and in April came
out for a tour of our operation in London. 1 have attached a copy of her letter.
Our main municipal contract is with the City of London where we process all of the leaf and
yard waste as well as operate two recycling depots. 1 have attached a C\?py of a letter from the
city.
We take pride in operating to the highest standard and would welcome you to .check with any
of our customers or municipalities we work with.
Mayor Craig and Council Members, 1 know we will be an asset to your community and 1
pledge to you that our operations will be to the same high standards we have set at our other
locations.
1 appreciate your support as we enter into this new venture. 1 remain available to address any
issue you may have as we move forward.
Yours truly, .
/
Peter Hill
www.tryrecycling.com
u
c
bb
~.........._,.
~
~
~u
~......~
E-cu
~11 ,
~".~
018
c c
-- --
V1
:J
~
:::::J
o
>-.
c
~
::J
+-'
cu
U
E
0
'-0 u
.
'-0 Cl
Ln c:
~ --
-
I U
'" >-
Ln U
~ OJ
'--
.......-...... >.
01 1.-
~ +-'
Ln ~
~ S
S
u
c
bJ:)
~.-
~
.~
l ~::.: :."',iC.' .~
~U
~G'
~~. ~'..CU
?~~~~
~ .r.
r" .,'_' _ ~_ _C"
':..-.;~.;/.::"".-::..~ ..........-:-.
;.;; l2JIa
.. III
c:n en C1J 'Ii
S Vl c:: V) c >
OJ ~ .+:; 0
0 -f-' -- V) V) -0 Vi L-
U - V) co 0...
U OJ c: 0
c: ::J >-. Vl Q) -0 -D m D- E ~ i
~ '-f- -C OJ -0 co E Vi
0 U U <J) OJ c: +--'
0 OJ c: ..c: 0 0 c: 0 ~
OJ OJ ~ ~ 0 OJ ....c: +-' :+-' u Q) ~ c
S Cl.. ~ V1 C co V) V1 Q)
U ~ Cl.. ~ .~ V1 L- a -0 u OJ E
c ::J V1 ~ OJ C ::J
c:n S Q) Q) .> E V1 C i'l1~
ro 0 c:n > OJ co co :~ C ,~""'
C 4--' (]J 0
t: OJ c c c Vi Q) -0 01 0 .+-, 'I......
-- C c:n-- ~ -0 C ~ C >
0 en OJ - .- 0
u c 1:;; c >- c V1 c
>-. Cl.. c u c u
c:n -- 0 OJ I- 0:: 0 ~ OJ !ll~,,'"
U E c > u 0 ~ ~ ~ ~i11
Cl.. U-o ~ l- +-'
Q) U Q) ~ =:5
-- 0 E ~c 0 S ::J li- ~ I- 0 Il!I *'.011"
0:: Cl.. ~ u ro
Cl.. ...c: li- 0 "III!
(]) 0 Q) 0 +-' <1J S
>- ..c: E 0 a::: V) ...c LI) -li- Vi
OJ u ~ C +-' 0
0:: -1--1 +-' _V1 0 l/) ....c:
I- > -C +-' U ::J V)
OJ -C I- -0
-I-' C +-' "$'
-C c: c
<( m ro
>-. -0
.......... m Z
a
u .cc: 0 0
ro Q) - U
...Y. m
LL. L... > ~
'I......
co <( ~
C U
0 <:)
-C (Y) ::t:t: Z
lO cc
C ~ ex::::
0
--l N
4--' >- LI) -0 C ~ Q) 0) >- ~ "'"'(J
V1 c:::: V"l c: ro ::J ....c c: 0::: 4--' C
0 ~ Q) CO OJ 0 ~ " ..j:::j ?- m
0.... u ....0 .u
0 u CU Vl
E Q) ~ c (Q Q.)- QJ (Q m OJ
0 ....c 0.... 0 QJ ~ ~ Vl '+- -0
u 4--' "~ -C m ::J U m
-f-J ~ C
....c Vl m m c: LI) ~ en ~
-0 ~ v1 c: 0 0)
U +--' ....0 Q) " ..j:::j -0 CL
.~ 2 .x VI -f-J - m ::J
+--' D.... V"l C
+-' vi U 0 c: ::J E ~ 0 0 0 8
c -0 '+- OJ 0- W CL ---l +-'
OJ la....- E 0 E ~ QJ "'"'0 E +--'
co +--'
.~ Q) 0.... 0 OJ c:
+--' -0 OJ 01 0 ...r:: OJ
::J ....c E QJ +--' U
C C Q) ....c 4--' E
c m +--' " i:: C ~ e
'+- :>... V) 4--' :t::::
+--' 0 OJ 0 0 -0
>. V1 0 4-
"~ :t= ~ C 4--'- " +:::i c: E
~ Q) c OJ 0 C c: 4--' m E ~
c
ro +--' c: 0 ....c "+:Z OJ QJ
Q) 0
::J V'l ""'0 E -f--I U -+-' +--' E ~
::J ::J C +--' -f-J U 0
0- C OJ m
""'0 m ~ -0 0 C ~ V) ~ ~
m c -f-J ::J m 0 u QJ 0 0 ~
VI V'l 4- +-' ~ ..c: ~ ~ 0)
Q) V1 ~ Q) m CL Q) +--' ":;: 0.... 0
QJ ~ ~ f- :d~
u -0 ....c +-' c: 0
-0 m ~ c ::J -0
~ Q.J C U +-' Q) en V1 c
"'"'0 QJ V'l Q) VI c: QJ
::J -0 m +-' c V1 ...r::
0 u C1J V1 0 ....c: co u
la....- X ...V"l ....c: ~ tE Q)
CL OJ E en OJ u u
E +--' 0 <lJ c: "~ ~ S +--' III J
>- +--' -0 ~ U S
ro m -0 -a Q) E QJ 0 .@d)
0::: -c C1J c ~ c ...c ....c OJ ....c (]J
f- +-' f- ro ....c: m ~ " .+::i +--' c::: V'l c:
~ V1 Q) C Dl QJ :::J e- m >-. 0 v) "~.
-a c ~ ~N
Ol ~ 0 U c: ..D. Z +--' 0.... +--' -;:: Q)
c u Vl Lf)
m co "~ m 0 ::::J "u ~ CO U U
-0 ~ -> ~ VI ""2 -I-' -2: ~
~ c: u u 0 U C -0 C C
~ 0 0 ~ c: ::J c
m ~ ~ Q) 0.... '+- >- 0 OJ bJJ
c +--' +-' 0.... 0.... E '+- -0 E V1
V'l V) V"l m 0:::: c
c: V1 0 t-- QJ Vl C OJ
V1 Q) V1 u -0 ~ ~
cU Q.J c: 0 ~ c V1 m OJ 0 C
U -0 ""'0 ~
~ ".;:; c ro 0 -~
u m V1 ?- m co :t= c I- ~ V1 ~
0 m
C 0) Cl.. 0 vi > CJ) C1J OJ E oj V) E 0
'+- 0 -D l/) Vl >- D- O
(J) E c
V) m ~ co ::J ""'0 C E ~
-;:: ...f--J 0 Vl . ;::: 0- ...::L. m Q) e::: ra ,.
Q) u Q) I-
u OJ >... ~ u V1 a >1~
ClJ-o Vl +-' 0- Q) c
VI m u 0 <1J U Vl '+- U -
c..(J) "'"'0 Q) E <( ~ S ....0 >< OJ 0 ra ~u
<1J <1.J ...::L. ....c V1
>< c > u Vl V'l m ~
OJ OJ 2 0 m 4- m V) ""'0 V1 E ~ ~
~ . ;::: 0 D.... 0 ~ m
CL D..... D.... Vl 0 ....c: $: Q) tG'
......, +-' <1.J ro >... 'I...... I-
0 E V) OJ u Q) -+-' :~
ro CJ) =:l +-' "~ > OJ ""'0 ro 0 C
OJ C ""'0 co Q) E c: m E
..c 0) ~ c U OJ ""'0 m ~ OJ 0
C C +--' 0-
<1J U 4- V1 Vl S -0 ~
+--' ~ -0 V1 en 0 OJ ~Q.)
......, U m u c: - ...f--J ~ C >- V1 C Q)
... ~ Q) ro 'I...... V) c:::: ::J ~ ro 'I......
C --0 ~
U OJ ~ c: OJ u OJ ?- m m 0... V)
(tj QJ E 0 U J- >... > vi U ...f--J d'.~
Q) u OJ Vl ....c C
U 0:::: E ...r::::. :-2 0) OJ -0 V) ..0 ~ VI OJ
-f-J Q) c 0::::: QJ QJ OJ ~
::J ~ 0 -0 c: +--' C Vl C Q) -0
~ -0 ""'0 E 4= >- V"l Lf) OJ t -0 -V1
C C OJ ~ ill 0::: co ::J > m m OJ
?- m co -0 -0 l- S ..D. ill CL OJ ~
'+-
o
co
'-+-
o
~
co
OJ
-0
CI..J
~
:::J Q)
...0 v) >
.;:: +-' m
;-J 0 Vl
.~ 0... 0
-0 (]) ;-J
Q) -0 ""'0
"-- 0 0
-0 +-' 0
?5 ~ S
-0"""'-
Q) ~
Vl "-
~ ClJ
!.....-""D
.. V1
Um
Q).~
u (])
>--. +-'
U co
~ E
.
V1
Q)
U
ra
o
L1l
E
2
4-
V')
OJ
01
c
....c
V)
4-
o
o
.......
~ vi
....cQ)
o..E
V1 0
CO-c
""Do
OJo
Uo
Go"
~~
.
-c
en
::J
o "
ctr;
Q) Q)
-00
Q) '-+-
U C
~.-
uO)
OJ.:::
....... >
.
QJ
C
ro .
1--'
o..::::L
s.~
+-'..p
co=
""D.c2
-0 ::J.......
..oS;
:::J 0-0
....D +-' C
o
+--'
~
co
u
o
L.()
N
L.() ..
~~
CD b::. .8
t) >- C
E ~-8
....c C
0)0
::J--.J
o E
~ 2
-04-
f:jfO
:::J S
-0 ....c
e .Q1
CL ...c
.
...c:
en
::J
o
c:
<lJ
-0
~
ClJ
>
o
u
~
.
>-.
8
ra
. i:: en
OJ c
tau
E.s
c-O
0>-.
"+::; ClJ
u ~
:::J 0
"-- -I-'
+-' U')
V"lo
25M
U co
..c:: +-'
enU
::J Q)
o W
~.8
""'0 --.
Q).:c
~.~
U OJ
~ S
.
~
;-J
C
:::J
o
~u
CD x
>. QJ
-o~
~""'O
4-:g
~~
,-+-C
o.~
~~
C !......-
:::J QJ
00..
0... >--.
l-.
o QJ
N >
or- Q)
-00
Q) ~
~-
C5"~
0.........
E~
o m
u E
.
o
o
o
("Yj
+-'
C
QJ
E
OJ
u
o
o
o
OJ"
~
o
-I-'
V) Y=
0... 0
-c ~
U OJ
"""D dJ
o b
o c
S 0
....c U
0) vi ..c::
:::J - 01
o 0 :J
cO Ovi
Q)D..Cl-.
-0 g> OJ ~
f:j 'E ~"E
-5 E U..::::L
0"- >-- u
"-- $ a:; 2
D... V1 !......- +-'
. .
c
.2
E
CD
~
o
V"l
~
QJ
t
co
:::s
CJ "
I V1
(l) :=:
~y:::
...c:""D
+-,C
c: co
CD -
....c: co
+-' u
QJ 0
o E
E 0
!......-
-0 '+-
OJ V1
t::: QJ
QJ C
> C
uS
.
~ ~
'~I~ :
.~...~.J..
';.1
J
TRY RECYCLING IS AN ONTARIO MADE COMPANY: PROVIDING
SOLUTIONS FOR ONTARIO RECYCLING CHALLENGES.
TRY Recycling cares about the environment and it shows.
Every year TRY Recycling finds new ways to expand product lines and to engineer better products
from construction, demolition and yard waste.
Our clients understand our goal is to work with them to improve the environment.
And we achieve results because we are experienced and well versed in the needs, opportunities and
goals of our industry"
_.'m~n~~ n~t~~~@r'1f~~._ ~~ ~~:
~~~@[JJwr~' ~~OO ~~~[M~~l ilOO~~. :~.
.
The TRY Recycling team understands that composting and recycling are no longer options, they are
the only choice. Environmental cleanup and responsibility is pushing its way to the front lines of
public awareness. Citizens realize landfills are no longer dumps and burying waste that could have
been recycled is a "real waste" of limited resources. The public wants to see a reduction in the numbers
going to landfills and governments are listening. TRY Recycling leads the way in the implementation
of the industry's options and products. The TRY Recycling
team works and produces at a higher standard than required
by government and industry guidelines.
Following 'his tour of TRY Recycljnjg~s London facility,
Gotd tyTi(/ef, Orrtarlo'sEf1virohm,:~htal C;OinmissiQner ta/I>s
to mf;i;nbers of the TRY Team.
LOOKING FOR NUMBERS?
WE'VE GOT THEM.
WE WEIGH IT. WE MEASURE IT. WE COUNT IT.
AND IT ALL ADDS UP TO TONNES.
IN FACT HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF TONNES.
in 2003, TRY Recycling processed and reclaimed over 1 00,000 tonnes of material.
Since the company swung open the gates in 1991, it has diverted in excess of three quarters of a million
tonnes of waste from Ontario landfills.
One hundred percent of the resulting recycled or composted products were returned to the marketplace.
The days when JJshuffle and burylJ were acceptable as waste disposal, are long since past and TRY
Recycling not only keeps material from plugging landfills it generates new products and it creates jobs.
.. ...- -' .... ... -. -.-' ',---. -.
c...... .........c....:...c<.........y#<OOW:... .....~.d; ..........::.. ~......>~-i. ............~-:.: d..' ::..d~.:.<.- .,
..... - ': ' ... ;" *" . . .. a'H' . - '-'. l-":-... .. :,..c.' -. " :..." .1-":,. . 1':-:- . ~
............ -. ....... ..~. ., ,!\ ............ -" ........ '. ~..;. .. 'i....'.. ...., t... . ~/~1f.i).; 9"~"i' t'i"'~ ........ ,
FOUNDRY SAND 15.28%
~~ 1.630/0 MSW - IN
., "'-.~::~ 1.66% DRYWALL
" -'" 1.72% ASPHALT
, 2.43% CLEAN WOOD
G~SS IN 9.08% ~ li~~i " . J:::~8F2:TB:~:: DEPOTS
ROOFING 7.790/0 ~". ", ',' 'I
.,~~~
-\ 4.39% CLEAN FILL
DEMOLITION 7.02%
~21.07% MIXED
YARD WASTE 12'97%~
4.85% CURBSIDE YARD MATERIALS
-- - -- -
'.. . . ._ . .. www.tryr~cyc.ling.GQm ". . ,. , .
TRY RECYCLING IS DOING IT RIGHT!
TRY'S CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL CLEARLY DEFINES
RECYCLING AND COMPOSTING AS TRY'S ONLY OPTION.
TRY Recycling1s business is recycl!!19..
TRY RECYCLING IS SETTING THE STANDARD
Municipalities looking for top-level, cost-effective waste management and
composting solutions are looking to TRY Recycling.
I TRY Recycling has developed an unequaled knowledge base and a superior level
of client service through years of experience with municipalities and industries.
I
Hard work, solid research and practical applications are good teachers,
I TRY Recycling can show you the numbers, the products and the benefits of
I recycling and composting.
IT ALL ADDS UP.
The TRY Recycl ing operation proves everyday that recycling is possible,
practical and affordable"
SEE FOR YOURSELF
Co,me ~and s,e,e our Lon€i0n' facility.
Get a first hand I Gok,. at the ~ecyclln~ anal GOlYfpostihg 'prG'('esses t'hat have bef~n de.velop,ed ,by
TRY Recycling.
Tours ~re availaQle t~rouaghout the year qnd can ,be arranged by (-ailing (51:9) 4~7-15"€i6.
- - - - "
:- _"- ". .www.tryrecytHng.com " " ., "..
· recycledl reused and redistributed 980/0 of all materials delivered to depots.
· recycled enough wood to save 150 acres of virgin forest.
· recycled asphalt roof shingles from 401000 homes.
· recovered enough metal to build 51250 cars.
e produced enough TRY Pave to build a two-lane highway from London to Windsor (3 II thick).
· recycled enough construction material (by weight) to erect a 30 storey building.
· composted 120 pounds of leaf and yard material for every person in Middlesex County.
· produced enough wood chips to fill 13/000 swimming pools.
· recycled enough concrete to fill 91000 cement truck mixers.
· diverted more than three-quarters of a million tonnes from local landfills.
_ The ECOP~:~~~~!~~red with
~ recycled landscape woodchlps. The chips
are made frorn discarded clean wood and screened to
make a uniform product. The resulting multi-purpose
material is engineered to keep weed growth down
and is routinely used in gardens. When used for
pathways it provides a soft, quick to dry, footing. More
than 2000 yards of woodchips were used on the
EcoPark paths. The volufTle is equal to the amount of
woodchips required to fill a line of pIckup trucks over
4 krns long.
ign9 give visitors recycling facts and figures.
TRY RECYCLING IS AN ESTABLISHED AND EXPERIENCED
COMPOSTING FACILITY.
TRY knowledge produces a quality, nutrient rich compost product that exceeds industry standards. 1t's the
TRY Team/s understanding of the microbial process and careful monitoring of oxidation and hydrolysis that
are the key elements in making the compost production as efficient and clean as possible. Simply put it's all
about the moisture content, the temperaturel the timing and the attention to details.
Creating the right environment for composting is a TRY Recycling priority and
a newly constructed windrow area showcases the TRY commitment to upgrades
and new technology.
TRY's focus is to create and engineer an environment enhancing
finished product, it is not simply disposal for compostables.
And TRY is successful, as its quality control processes deliver a
product that exceeds MOE requirements and the standards
set by the Composting Council of Canada. TRY compost is
engineered to be the best prepared natural soil amendment for
commercial use.
ITIS ALL ABOUT MAKING THINGS HAPPEN.
AND AT TRY RECYCLING WE KNOW THE IMPORTANCE OF
DEVELOPING NEW PRODUCTS AND IMPROVING OUR
RECYCLING AND COMPOSTING PROCESSES.
TRY Recycling invests in ideas and engineering.
It's how TRY stays ahead.
It's how TRY delivers the best recycling and composting solutions to its clients.
It's how TRY continues to improve our environment.
The results of TRY Recycling's R&D commitment"can be found all acrd~ss Ontario.
Take 9 ride on th~ TRY Pave path 'in the Pinery Provincjall~ark. Desjgn'ed and engioeered as a.oh affordable
alternative for driveways, paths or parking lots, TRY Pave is made
II from a com'binati6nof recycled sh'ingles, '(yes, just like tho5i>e ,on
the roof of your hp'me)/ ~n9 discarded roadw~y a,sphalt. The
specially engineered mix of mater"ials prodLJc~s a solid, safe
surface. In the Park 'it prQvides the perfect surface for hikers,
cyclists and wheelchair access.
Composting processes and products have continually been upgraded and far exceed industry or
government standards. TRY works closely with A&L Labs and all TRY Landscaping Products from
compost to mulch to the Premiere Topsoil are engineered to exact standards. Nutrient levels and
product material composition are strictly monitored.
- - ~ -
, . . . ." ". www.tryrecycling.co~. ~.
The Gail Graham EcoPark is a 10- hectare nature and recreational park located 20 minutes from downtown
London. Donated by William Graham and TRY Recycling, the EcoPark is for the use and enjoyment of
disadvantaged area youth.
Built on a reclaimed gravel pit, the park incorporates open grass areas, natural wetlands, ponds, a nature
study zone, sports fields, rain shelters and connecting pathways. In June 2004, the designated
Environmental Study Area was unveiled by Gord Miller, Ontario's Environmental Commissioner. He met
with the TRY Team and applauded their work and their committment to the environment.
Park Rangers
The Boys and Girls Club of London is the principle user of the park. The EcoPark provides the space and
facilities for summer camps and special programs. The Club has also taken on the role of facility
management and is the contact point for other organizations wishing to use the park. The Boys and Girls
Club was active in developing the park's potential and plans and the summer of 2004 marked the first
season of daily use by the club's members. Community support for the park continues to grow. In June,
the City of London approved the use and installation of an outdoor pool.
Get the Community Excited and Suddenly There's a Playground
Local businesses have also seen the tremendous community value offered at the EcoPark and in October
more than 200 volunteers arrived at the site to lend hands and hammers for a special project.
A mega playground, sponsored by Home Depot and valued at $100,000 was assembled. The London
Community Foundation provided the seed funds for the playground. Remarkably, construction of the
play area was completed in one day. The Gail Graham EcoPark has taken off and the opportunities it
gives inner city children to play and explore nature is unparalleled.
And Of Course It's All Recycled
TRY Recycling designed and built the park using many of the recycled materials produced at the London
facility. Materials used include recycled utility poles for decks and docks, composted yard material provided
top quality compost for grass areas, clean wood for landscape woodchips for pathwaysJ and recycled and
engineered sand for the volleyball courts. Even what appears to be traditional pavement in the parking
area is actually a mixture of recycled roof shingles from area homes combined with discarded and recycled
asphalt from roadways to make a dry surface material called TRY Pave. Signs within the park help visitors
identify and understand how the recycled materials have been used.
_" , ' , .' www.tryr-ecyclihg~GOm.. ", H- " :. " "
TRY RECYCLING LIKES BEING PART OF A COMMUNITY.
IT'S THAT SIMPLE.
Being a responsible employer and corporate citizen means being active in the community. But at
TRY Recycling giving back to the community isn't just a management initiative. The entire TRY team
gets involved and whether it/s taking to the volleyball court for a Youth Opportunities Unlimited fundraiser
or working on the development of the Gail Graham EcoPark, the TRY team does its best.
Some TRY Friends
Gail Graham EcoPark
Habitat Re-Use
YOU
Compost London
Londonts Curbside Food Drive
Compost Day
Friends of the Coves
Growa Row Program
St. Leonard's Society
London Boys & Girls Club
AND THE CO:~MMUNITY G"IVE'S B,ACK TO TRY RECY:CLING
2003 Winner oJ the LQndlJ"n Chamber of ColtHlletce Business~A~hieverrie'ht Awards, Envifonment Award;
The award r:ecogni~es one IGcal company for 'outsta'nding achieve'ment and leqdersbip in pro,Qlams
designed to nl'cfi"fltain and protect a healthy environment.
2001 Ethics in Action 200'1 Socially Respo'ns'ible De~lsio~h-Ma'king Awarq
1999 Finalist in the Recycling Counc'il of Canqdcts Ontario'Wqste Mrin}mization ~Aw,aro
~ " ,,' : v.vww.tryrecycli~g.com ':. , '
",,-,,$ 'N It
,~, SIMCOE COUNTY
;':'11':'; DISTRICT HEALTH UNIT
~~ II ~l15 Sperling Drive, Barrie, Ontario L4M 6K9
U~'ry o,sn\\G~"
MEDICAL OFFICER OF HEALTH
Dr. George Pasut
TEL: 705-721-7330 FAX: 705-721.1495
March 16,2005
Mayor Craig and Members of Council
Township of Oro-Medonte
148 Line 7 South, P.O. Box 100
Oro, ON LOL 2XO
Dear Mayor Craig and Members of Council:
I am pleased to send you the executive summary from our "Simcoe County
Healthy Living Strategy: An Integrated Approach (Healthy Living Strategy)" and
our "Call to Action: Building a Lifetime of Good Health Begins Now (Call to
Action)". The board of health has endorsed both documents and requested that
the health unit share these two new chronic disease prevention resources with
you and to follow this up with a deputation to council.
Research shows that we are at a critical point in influencing the health of Ontario
children, youth and adults. Our recent Simcoe County Child Health Survey
suggests that close to one half of local Grade 1 children may not be meeting
national recommendations for healthy eating and physical activity, and one in
four (26%) are overweight, or at risk of becoming overweight. These unhealthy
trends also exist for older youth and adults. Physical inactivity and unhealthy
eating are two modifiable lifestyle behaviours related to chronic diseases, such
as heart disease, type 2 diabetes, and many cancers, which are major causes of
illness and death for Simcoe County residents, as well as the rest of Ontario.
The Call to Action issues a challenge to each community sector to increase
opportunities for residents of Simcoe County to make healthy choices. Practical
suggestions are provided for businesses and organizations, health professionals,
schools, parents, and workplaces to increase opportunities for local residents to
make healthier daily activity and eating choices. We are distributing our Call to
Action widely to all sectors throughout Simcoe County and will be calling upon
everyone to act now for a healthy future.
...2
BRANCH [Collingwood
OFFICES: 280 Pretty River Pkwy L9Y 4J5
TEL: 445-0804 FAX: 445.6498
[ Midland
1156 SL Andrew's Drive, Box 626_ L4R 4L3
TEL: 526-9324 FAX: 526.1513
( Orillia
575 West SL. S_ Uni112. L3V 7N6
TEL: 325.9565 FAX; 325.2091
( Cookstown
25 King St" S" Uni12.l0l1l0
TEL: 458-1103 FAX: 458-0105
l\
2
I encourage you to read the enclosed resources, and to share the summaries
provided with municipal staff and other colleagues. A full copy of these resources
can also be accessed on our web site at www.simcoehealth.orq. Additional
copies can be obtained by calling Health Connection at 1-877-721-7520.
One of my staff will follow-up with your clerk to schedule a deputation. In the
meantime, Christine Bushey, Manager, Chronic Disease Prevention - Healthy
Lifestyle Program can be contacted if you have questions about our Healthy
Living Strategy and Call to Action. She can be reached at 705-721-7330 ext. 376
or cbusheY\alsimcoehealth.orq.
Sincerely,
~~
George Pasut, MD, MHSc, FRCPC, FACPM
Medical Officer of Health
GP:CB:ba
c: Clerk
Encl. (4)
Simcoe County Healthy
Simcoe County Healthy
Living Strategy
Living Strategy
A Call to Action:
A Call to Action:
Building a Lifetime of Good Health
Building a Lifetime of Good Health
Begins Now
Begins Now
Chronic Disease Prevention -Healthy Lifestyle Program
Chronic Disease Prevention -Healthy Lifestyle Program
SIMCOE MUSKOKA DISTRICT HEALTH UNIT
Chronic Disease
Chronic Disease
EARLIER IN LIFE
EARLIER IN LIFE
Now seeing chronic diseases
Now seeing chronic diseases
Chronic diseases include
Chronic diseases include
Type 2 Diabetes, Heart disease, Stroke, Cancers (lung, breast,
Type 2 Diabetes, Heart disease, Stroke, Cancers (lung, breast,
?
?
cervical, colon, oral and skin)
cervical, colon, oral and skin)
Results in:
Results in:
Premature death (dying before your time)
Premature death (dying before your time)
?
?
Increased illness throughout one’s life
Increased illness throughout one’s life
?
?
Reduced quality of life
Reduced quality of life
?
?
SIMCOE MUSKOKA DISTRICT HEALTH UNIT
Impact of
Impact of
Chronic Diseases in
Chronic Diseases in
Canada
Canada
Leadingcause of death
Leadingcause of death
?
?
By 2020, 73%of all deaths will be due
By 2020, 73%of all deaths will be due
?
?
to chronic diseases
to chronic diseases
16 million Canadians live with a
16 million Canadians live with a
?
?
chronic disease
chronic disease
Burden of illness $159 billion per year (1998)
Burden of illness $159 billion per year (1998)
?
?
SIMCOE MUSKOKA DISTRICT HEALTH UNIT
Rates of Chronic Disease
Rates of Chronic Disease
in Simcoe County
in Simcoe County
In Simcoe County (in 2003):
In Simcoe County (in 2003):
12, 433 adults living with heart disease (4%)
12, 433 adults living with heart disease (4%)
?
?
15, 541 adults living with diabetes (5%)
15, 541 adults living with diabetes (5%)
?
?
12, 433 adults living with cancer (4%)
12, 433 adults living with cancer (4%)
?
?
35% of adults overweight
35% of adults overweight
?
?
18% of adults obese
18% of adults obese
(greater than the rest of Ontario)
(greater than the rest of Ontario)
?
?
SIMCOE MUSKOKA DISTRICT HEALTH UNIT
Is Childhood Obesity an
Is Childhood Obesity an
Epidemic?
Epidemic?
Canada in the last 15 year period:
Canada in the last 15 year period:
Childhood overweight doubled
Childhood overweight doubled
?
?
Childhood obesity has tripled
Childhood obesity has tripled
?
?
Obese children and teens become obese
Obese children and teens become obese
?
?
adults
adults
SIMCOE MUSKOKA DISTRICT HEALTH UNIT
Why are Canadian Children
Why are Canadian Children
Inactive?
Inactive?
Time pressures
Time pressures
?
?
Lack of physical activity in school
Lack of physical activity in school
?
?
Television, computer games
Television, computer games
?
?
Inactive parents
Inactive parents
?
?
Transportation
Transportation
?
?
Cost of recreation
Cost of recreation
?
?
Lack of facilities or programs
Lack of facilities or programs
?
?
Unsafe environments
Unsafe environments
?
?
SIMCOE MUSKOKA DISTRICT HEALTH UNIT
Dramatic Change in
Dramatic Change in
Eating Patterns
Eating Patterns
Over Past 30 years
Over Past 30 years
Lessnutritious foods
Lessnutritious foods
?
?
More restaurant meals / more fast foods
More restaurant meals / more fast foods
?
?
Supersizing
Supersizing
?
?
Soft drinks instead of milk or water
Soft drinks instead of milk or water
?
?
More non-nutritious foods
More non-nutritious foods
?
?
Daily candy
Daily candy
?
?
Daily potato chips
Daily potato chips
?
?
SIMCOE MUSKOKA DISTRICT HEALTH UNIT
What Else Affects Health?
What Else Affects Health?
Personal health practices
Personal health practices
?
?
Income and social status
Income and social status
?
?
Education
Education
?
?
Physical environment
Physical environment
?
?
Working conditions
Working conditions
?
?
Social support network
Social support network
?
?
Healthy child development
Healthy child development
?
?
Access to health services
Access to health services
?
?
Biology and genetics
Biology and genetics
?
?
SIMCOE MUSKOKA DISTRICT HEALTH UNIT
Simcoe County
Simcoe County
Child Health Survey
Child Health Survey
During 2003:
During 2003:
1172 Grade 1 students were surveyed
1172 Grade 1 students were surveyed
?
?
Average age of 7 years
Average age of 7 years
?
?
3 components:
3 components:
Child height and weight measurements
Child height and weight measurements
?
?
Parental phone survey
Parental phone survey
?
?
Teacher questionnaire
Teacher questionnaire
?
?
SIMCOE MUSKOKA DISTRICT HEALTH UNIT
What We Know About
What We Know About
Simcoe County
Simcoe County
Simcoe County Child Health Survey
Simcoe County Child Health Survey
1/2 of Grade 1 children may not meet even the minimum
1/2 of Grade 1 children may not meet even the minimum
recommendations for physical activity and healthy eating
recommendations for physical activity and healthy eating
Physical activity
Physical activity
1/2 are not active for the recommended 90 minutes per day
1/2 are not active for the recommended 90 minutes per day
?
?
Healthy eating
Healthy eating
more than half eat at least one “less healthy" food every day
more than half eat at least one “less healthy" food every day
?
?
1/4 drink sweet drinks every day
1/4 drink sweet drinks every day
?
?
2/3 of families eat at least one restaurant meal weekly
2/3 of families eat at least one restaurant meal weekly
?
?
1/2 eat dinner together
1/2 eat dinner together
?
?
Over 2/3 watch TV every day
Over 2/3 watch TV every day
?
?
1/4 are not within an acceptable weight range
1/4 are not within an acceptable weight range
?
?
SIMCOE MUSKOKA DISTRICT HEALTH UNIT
How Can We Help
Our Children?
Child Health Surveyresults identify a problem
Child Health Surveyresults identify a problem
1.
1.
Simcoe County Healthy Living Strategyprovides a
Simcoe County Healthy Living Strategyprovides a
2.
2.
planning framework to guide decision-makers
planning framework to guide decision-makers
A Call to Actionoutlines the involvement of in
everyone
A Call to Actionoutlines the involvement of in
everyone
3.
3.
our community
our community
Result: Develop & Implement more opportunities for
Result: Develop & Implement more opportunities for
4.
4.
healthier food choices and increased daily physical
healthier food choices and increased daily physical
activity
activity
SIMCOE MUSKOKA DISTRICT HEALTH UNIT
SIMCOE MUSKOKA DISTRICT HEALTH UNIT
What Can Each of Us
What Can Each of Us
Do NOW?
Do NOW?
Improve opportunities for:
Improve opportunities for:
Healthier food choices
?
Healthier food choices
?
Increased daily
?
Increased daily
?
Be aware
Be aware
physical activity
physical activity
Make it easy
Make it easy
Be involved
Be involved
Speak out
Speak out
SIMCOE MUSKOKA DISTRICT HEALTH UNIT
What can Each of Us
What can Each of Us
Do NOW?
Do NOW?
Community
Community
Organizations
Organizations
and Businesses
and Businesses
Health
Health
Professionals
Professionals
Parents
Parents
Schools
Workplaces
Workplaces
SIMCOE MUSKOKA DISTRICT HEALTH UNIT
Local Governments Play an
Local Governments Play an
Important Role
Important Role
Mayors Walks
Mayors Walks
?
?
Recreation subsidies
Recreation subsidies
?
?
Community based programs
Community based programs
?
?
Healthy food choices available at a lower cost
Healthy food choices available at a lower cost
?
?
in municipal facilities
in municipal facilities
Make health a priority in official plans (e.g.
Make health a priority in official plans (e.g.
?
?
community design, active transportation -
community design, active transportation -
bike paths, walking trails)
bike paths, walking trails)
SIMCOE MUSKOKA DISTRICT HEALTH UNIT
Reports
Reports
Simcoe County Healthy
Simcoe County Healthy
Living Strategy: An
Living Strategy: An
Integrated Approach
Integrated Approach
Simcoe County Child
Simcoe County Child
Health Survey
Health Survey
A Call to Action:
A Call to Action:
Building a Lifetime of
Building a Lifetime of
Good Health Begins
Good Health Begins
Now
Now
SIMCOE MUSKOKA DISTRICT HEALTH UNIT
Questions
Questions
SIMCOE MUSKOKA DISTRICT HEALTH UNIT
<.~
GAVILLER & COMPANY LLP
MEMO
TO: Council, Township of Oro-Medonte
DATE: June 22,2005
FROM: Sue Martin
RE: 2004 Audited Financial Report
Here are the highlights from the 2004 financials:
o Net expenditures (or deficit) of $822,000 for the year, which is the
combined total for current fund, capital fund and reserves.
o Current fund ending balance was a deficit of $72,000 that will be included
and funded through the 2005 budget.
o Cash and temporary investments of $4.5 million (decrease of $1.3 million
over last year due to $822,000 deficit and cash used to pay down
accounts payable and to fund increase in taxes receivable).
o Taxes receivable $2.2 million (increase of $300,000 over last year)
represents about 10% of the total levy for the year, which is average
compared to other municipalities (at 5 to 14%).
o Accounts payable and accrued liabilities decreased $232,000 from 2003
due to timing of payments to various suppliers.
o Other current liabilities include deposits from: developers, occupancy
permits, lot grading and building security deposits. The total decreased
$181,000 during the year as developer deposits were refunded in the
normal course of business and $123,000 of land deposits were settled.
o Deferred revenue represents obligatory reserve funds dictated by the
Development Charges Act (DCA). Total at the end of 2004 was $1.2
million. During the year the obligatory reserve fund for recreational land
was exhausted to zero.
o Reserves total $4.5 million, consisting of: $1.9 million for purchase of
specific assets, $1.1 million for working funds, $1 million for waterworks
and $335,000 for contingencies.
o Capital fund activity included: new fire pumper truck, emergency
communications equipment, land purchase for parks and recreation and
water pumphouse at Warminster. Overall capital expenditures were $3.3
million compared to a budget of $4.4 million (Moonstone fire hall did not
proceed, public works trucks not all purchased).
We would like to highlight the fact that Paul Gravelle and his staff were extremely co-
operative and helpful during both our interim and year end visits. We would also like to
thank you for the opportunity to serve as auditors for Oro-Medonte. We look forward to
many years of association with you.
.I
A r--('J.
CORPORATION OF THE
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
COUNTY OF SIMCOE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31,2004
DECEMBER 31,2004
CONTENTS
Auditors' Report
Balauce Sheet
Statement of Operations
Statement of Cash Flow
Notes to the Financial Statements
Schedule I - Schedule of Current Fund Operations
Schedule 2 - Schedule of Capital Fund Operations
Schedule 3 - Schedule of Reserves and Reserve Fund Operations
AUDITORS' REPORT
To the Members of Council, Inhabitants and Ratepayers of the
Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte:
We have audited the balance sheet of the Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte as at
December 31, 2004, and the statements of operations and cash flows for the year then ended. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the municipality's management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards. Those
standards require that we plan and perfoffil an audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the
overall financial statement presentation.
In our opinion, these financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of
the municipality as at December 31, 2004 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year
then ended in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles.
~&~il'P
Chartered Accountants
Collingwood, Ontario
February 24,2005
Municipal position
Current fund (Note 6 and Schedule I)
Reserves (Schedule 3)
Fund balances
BALANCE SHEET lie--
AS AT DECEMBER 31
2004 2003
$ $
4,039,986 5,821,689
503,453
2,247,846 1,946,022
800,247 815,513
15,040 46,242
7,640 22,424
7,614,212 8,651,890
768,538 1,001,315
1,254,247 1,435,485
1,209,712 1,164,901
172,495 19,045
3,404,992 3,620,746
4,209,220 5,031,144
(72,075) 82,647
4,453,790 4,967,542
4,381,715 5,050,189
(172,495) (19,045)
4,209,220 5,031,144
Financial assets
Cash (Note 2)
Temporary investments (Note 3)
Taxes receivable
Trade and other receivables
Inventory held for resale
Long-term receivables
Liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
Other current liabilities
Deferred revenue (Note 4)
Net long-term liabilities (Note 5)
Net financial assets
Amounts to be recovered (Note 7)
Total municipal position
Approved on behalf of Council:
Mayor
Date
The accompanying notes are an integral part of
this financial statement
2
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31
Budget Actual Actual
2004 2004 2003
$ $ $
(Unaudited)
Revenues
Taxation 7,395,706 7,464,997 6,991,702
Taxation from other governments 135,363 143,429 136,868
User eharges 2,158,047 2,203,670 2,128,664
Ontario grants 285,046 133,945 497,504
Developer eontributions - revenue recognized 1,134,600 651,787 347,402
Investment income 204,825 157,286 210,265
Sundry revenue 265,004 372,515 306,086
Other income (Note 8) 1,903,481 2,054,390 2,046,703
Disposal of capital assets 49,453 9,594
13,482,072 13,231,472 12,674,788
Expenditures
Current
General government 1,645,347 1,867,864 1,756,871
Fire and emergency services 700,711 679,693 665,876
Police 1,453,635 1,563,595 1,412,183
Building, planning and protection 1,029,202 1,109,706 924,205
Transportation services 3,032,844 3,044,187 2,976,765
Waterworks systems 655,024 682,361 589,513
Parks and recreation 570,279 577,903 467,308
Library services 199,120 199,098 192,070
Waste management 1,059,120 1,031,425 1,006,706
10,345,282 10,755,832 9,991,497
Capital
General government 206,500 206,588 328,855
Fire and emergency services 929,439 400,978 69,462
Building, planning and protection 124,197 81,129 155,977
Transportation services 1,735,900 1,146,634 988,450
Waterworks systems 818,405 773,696 529,143
Parks and recreation 558,235 688,539 222,1 02
4,372,676 3,297,564 2,293,989
14.717,958 14,053,396 12,285,486
Net revenues (expenditures) for the year (1,235,886) (821,924) 389,302
Change in amounts to be recovered:
Issuance of long-term liabilities 164,100
Principal repayment of long-term liabilities (10,649) (10,650) (16,053)
Change in fund balances for the year (1,246,535) (668,474) 373,249
The accompanying notes are an integral part of
this financial statement
3
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOW
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31
2004
$
Cash flows from (for):
Operating activities
Net revenues (expenditures) for the year
Changes in:
Taxes receivable
Trade and other receivables
Inventory held for resale
Long-term receivables
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
Other current liabilities
Deferred revenue
(821,924)
(301,824)
15,266
31,202
14,784
(232,777)
(181,238)
44,811
(1,431,700)
Net change in cash from operations
Investing activities
Decrease in investments
(503,453)
1,021,205
Financing activities
Issuance of long-term liabilities
Principal repayment oflong-term liabilities
Net change in cash from financing
Net change in cash position
Cash position, beginning of year
Cash position, end of year
164,100
(10,650)
153,450
(1,781,703)
5,821,689
4,039,986
The accompanying notes are an integral part of
this financial statement
2003
$
389,302
248,762
95,114
(46,242)
2,931
(407,081)
296,176
569,809
1,148,771
(16,053)
(16,053)
2,153,923
3,667,766
5,821,689
4
NOTES TO THE FINAt'lCIAL STATEMENTS
AS AT DECEMBER 31, 2004
1. Summary of significant accounting policies
(a) Management responsibility
The financial statements of the Township are the representations of management. They have been
prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles established by the Public
Sector Accounting Board of the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants. The preparation of
financial statements in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles requires
management to make estimates that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenditures during the reporting period.
Actual results could differ from management's best estimates as additional information becomes available
in the future.
(b) Basis of consolidation
The consolidated statements reflect the assets, liabilities, sources of financing, and expenditures of the
current fund, capital fund, reserves, and reserve funds of all municipal organizations, committees, and
boards which are owned or controlled by the Council. All interfund assets and liabilities and revenues
and expenditures have been eliminated on consolidation.
The following boards and municipalities owned or controlled by Council have been consolidated;
None
Government business enterprises and partnerships are separate legal entities which do not rely on the
municipality for funding. Investments in governmeut business enterprises are accounted for using the
modified equity method. The following government business enterprises are reflected in the consolidated
financial statements:
None
(c) Basis of accounting
Sources of financing and expenditures are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. The accrual basis
of accounting recognizes revenues as they become available and measurable. Expenditures are
recognized as they are incurred and measurable as a rcsult of receipt of goods or services and the creation
of a legal obligation to pay.
The balance sheet reflects all of the financial assets and liabilities of the municipality. Financial assets
are those assets which could provide resources to discharge existing liabilities or finance future
operations. Municipal position represents the financial position of the municipality, and is the difference
between its assets and liabilities. This provides information about the municipality's overall future
revenue requirements and its ability to finance activities and meet its obligations.
(d) Investments
Investments are recorded at the lower of cost or market value.
(e) Inventory
Inventory of goods held for resale is recorded at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Cost is
determined on the average cost basis.
5
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS AT DECEMBER 31, 2004
1. Summary of siguificant accounting policies (continued)
(f) Capital assets
The historical cost and accumulated amortization of capital assets arc not recorded for municipal
purposes. Capital assets are reported as an expenditure on the statement of operations in the period of
acquisition.
(g) Deferred revenue
Revenue restricted by legislation, regulation, or agreement and not available for general municipal
purposes is reported as deferred revenue on the balance sheet. The revenue is reported on the statement
of operations in the year in which it is used for the specified purpose.
(h) Amounts to be recovered
Amounts to be recovered are reported in the municipal position on the balance sheet. The balance
represents the outstanding principal portion of unmatured long-term liabilities, liabilities not yet due, and
other future expenditures not yet levied on the ratepayers.
(i) County and school boards
The municipality collects taxation revenue on behalf of the school boards and the County of Simcoe.
The taxation, other revenues, expenditures, assets and liabilities with respect to the operations of the
school boards and the County of Simcoe are not reflected in these financial statements.
2. Cash
Cash consists of the following:
2004 2003
$ $
Unrestricted 2,830,274 4,656,788
Restricted 1,209,712 1,164,901
4,039,986 5,821,689
3. Financial instruments
The municipality's financial instruments consist of cash, temporary investments, taxes receivable, trade and
other receivables, long-term receivables, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, other liabilities and long-
term liabilities. It is management's opinion that the company is not exposed to significant interest, currency
or credit risks arising from tbcsc financial instruments.
Temporary investments consist of cashable term deposits maturing in October 2009 earning interest at
3.55% per annum.
6
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS AT DECEMBER 31, 2004
4. Deferred revenue
The net change during the year in the restricted deferred revenue balances is made up as follows:
Obligatory Reserve Funds:
Development Charges Act
Recreational land
Development Recreational
Charges Act Land Total
$ $ $
1.065,621 99,280 1,164,901
592,482 76,286 668,768
27,315 516 27,831
(475,706) (176,082) (651,788)
1,209,712 1,209,712
2004 2003
$ $
1,209,712 1,065,621
99,280
1,209,712 1,164,901
Deferred revenue, beginning of year
Restricted funds received during the year
Interest earned
Revenue recognized during the year
Deferred revenue, end of year
7
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS AT DECEMBER 31, 2004
5. Long-term liabilities
Long-tenn liabilities consist of the following:
Equipmeut loan, 0%, payable $614 monthly, due March 2005
Promissory note, 0%, due in 2005
Equipment loan, 1.9%, repayable $612 monthly, due March 2004
2004
$
1,229
159,000
2003
$
8,601
1,836
Tile drainage loans, interest ranging from 8% to 10%, payments
ranging from $581 to $1,550 per year, due 2004 to 2014
12,266
172,495
8,608
19,045
Principal payments for the next 5 years and thereafter are as follows:
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Thereafter
$
161,557
1,435
1,549
1,673
1,807
4,474
The annual principal and interest payments are within the annual debt repayment limit prescribed by the
Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing.
6. Current fund
The current fund consists of the following:
$
2003
$
2004
Available to offset future revenue requirements (required to be
financed from future revenues):
General area taxation
Communal tile beds
Recreation, community cenlres and arenas
Street lights
(57,198)
(3,038)
(10,001)
(1,838)
(72,075)
96,289
(347)
(7,612)
(5,683)
82,647
8
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS AT DECEMBER 31, 2004
7. Amounts to be recovered
2004
$
2003
$
Capital outlay financed by long-term liabilities and to be
recovered in future years
172,495
19,045
8. Other income
Olher income consists of the following:
2004 2004 2003
Bndget Actual Actual
$ $ $
(Unaudited)
Penalties and interest on taxation 354,000 344,400 367,300
Service charges and fees 177,831 194,910 182,438
Licences and permits 660,000 678,642 775,426
Fines 436,850 554,568 451,630
Facility rentals 274,800 281,870 269,909
1,903,481 2,054,390 2,046,703
9. Expenditures by object
Total operating expenditures for the year reported on the statement of operations are as follows:
Salaries, wages and employee benefits
Materials, rents and financial expense
Contracted service
Contributions to other organizations
2004
$
3,775,913
3,251,048
3,274,122
454,749
10,755,832
2003
$
3,494,675
3,013,818
3,128,746
354,258
9,991,497
10.Pension agreements
The municipality makes contributions to the Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement Fund (OMERS),
which is a multi-employer plan, on bchalf of 57 (2003 - 58) members of its staff. This plan is a defined
benefit plan which specifies the amount of the retirement benefit to be received by the employees based on
the length of service and rates of pay. The amount contributed to OMERS for 2004 was $158,347 (2003 -
$49,621). As of July 31,1998, OMERS announced a contribution holiday. Full contribution rates were re-
instated in 2004.
9
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS AT DECEMBER 31, 2004
Il.Public sector salary disclosure
During 2004, no employees were paid a salary, as defined in the Public Sector Salary Disclosure Act, 1996,
of $1 00,000 or more by the Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte.
12.Budget amounts
Under Canadian generally accepted accounting principles, budget amounts are to be reported on the
statement of operations for comparative purposes. The 2004 budget amounts for the Corporation of the
Township of Oro-Medonte are unaudited but approved by Council have been restated to conform to the
basis of preparation of the revenues and expenditures on the statement of operations.
13. Operations of school boards and the County of Simcoe
During the year, the following taxation revenue was raised and remitted to the school boards and the County
of Simcoe:
School Boards
County of Simcoe
2004
$
8,424,599
6,224,651
14,649,250
2003
$
7,986,912
5,879,154
13,866,066
14.Commitments
The Township has leased various equipment for which the minimum annual lease payments are as follows:
$
91,815
62,461
57,332
33,863
1,082
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
The township has entered into capital construction contracts totalling $483,850 to be performed after year
end.
15. Contingencies
Claims have been filed against the Township requesting damages. The ultimate outcome of these claims is
not determinable at the time of issue of these fiuancial statements. No provision for these claims has been
recorded in these financial statements. Settlements in excess of insurance, if any, will be reflected in the
periods in which financial settlement occurs.
During 1991, the County of Simcoe assumed the waste management of the Township pursuant to provincial
legislation. In connection therewith, the Township transferred the property and related assets utilized in its
waste management activities to the County. The legislation provides for linancial adjustments to be made
between the Township and County with respect to the transfer of these activities, the property and related
assets. Settlements were reached for the related assets in prior years. Negotiations remain unresolved and
indeterminate regarding the landfill sites and gravel pit property. Settlements will be reflected in the periods
in which the settlements occur.
10
SCHEDULE 1
SCHEDULE Of' CURRENT FUND OPERATIONS r
\..-
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31
Budget Actual Actual
2004 2004 2003
$ $ $
(Unaudited)
Revenues
Taxation 7,395,706 7,464,997 6,991,702
Taxation from other governments 135,363 143,429 136,868
User charges 2,158,047 2,203,670 2,128,664
Ontario grants 130,902 160,018 151,644
Investment income 204,825 157,286 210,265
Sundry revenue 244,179 289,579 274,394
Other income (Note 8) 1,903,481 2,054,390 2,046,703
Disposal of capital assets 22,000
12, I 72,503 12,495,369 11,940,240
Expenditures
General government 1,645,347 1,867,864 1,756,871
Fire and emergency services 700,711 679,693 665,876
Police 1,453,635 1,563,595 1,412,183
Building, planning and protection 1,029,202 1,109,706 924,205
Transportation services 3,032,844 3,044,187 2,976,765
Waterworks systems 655,024 682,361 589,513
Parks and recreation 570,279 577,903 467,308
Library services 199,120 199,098 192,070
Waste management 1,059,120 1,031,425 1,006,706
10,345,282 10,755,832 9,991,497
Net revenues 1,827,221 1,739,537 1,948,743
Financing and transfers
Issuance of long-term liabilities 164,100
Principal repayment of long-term liabilities (10,649) (10,650) (16,053)
Transfer to capital fund (1,117,718) (1,221,324) (530,041)
Transfer to reserves (823,322) (826,385) (1,459,136)
Net financing and transfers (1,951,689) (1,894,259) (2,005,230)
Change in current fund balance (124,468) (154,722) (56,487)
Opening current fund balance 82,647 82,647 139,134
Closing current fund balance (41,821) (72,075) 82,647
The accompanying notes are an integral part of
this financial statement
II
SCHEDULE 2
SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL FUND OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31
'-
Budget
2004
$
(Unaudited)
Actual
2004
$
Actual
2003
$
Revenues
Ontario grants (repaid)
Developer contributions - revenue recognized
Contributions from benefiting landowners
Donations
154,144
1,134,600
(26,073) 345,860
625,703 347,402
7,473
72,936 24,219
672,566 724,954
20,825
1,309,569
Expenditures
General government
Fire and emergency services
Police
Building, planning and protection
Transportation services
Waterworks systems
Parks and recreation
Net expenditures
206,500 206,588 328,855
929,439 400,978 69,462
124,197 81,129 155,977
1,735,900 1,146,634 988,450
818,405 773,696 529,143
558,235 688,539 222,102
4,372,676 3,297,564 2,293,989
(3,063,107) (2,624,998) (1,569,035)
Financing and transfers
Transfer from current fund
Transfer from reserves
Net financing and transfers
1,117,718
1,945,389
3,063,107
1,221,324
1,403,674
2,624,998
530,041
1,038,994
1,569,035
Change in capital fuud balance
Opening capital fund balance
Closing capital fund balance
The accompanying notes are an integral part of
this financial statement
12
The accompanying notes are an integral part of
this financial statement
13
.
d - \
THE CORPORI\TION OF THE
"~l[~' HJlirnrflCnn ]1 I n -furr
~~'O\\7N ~HTp
1 V\ ~,C) 11 J .
C;;V_or ~/~edO/w
148 Line 7 S., Box JOC
Oro. Oma.rio lOL 2XC
Phone (705) 487-217
fax (705) 487 -013.=0
WVVW .oro-mecionIC .Ct;
April 19, 2005
S/Sgt. Ed Whinnery
Detachment Commander
OPP - Barrie Detachment
20 Rose Street
Barrie, Ontario
L4M 2T2
Re: Ontario Provincial Police Informatjon Request
Dear S/Sgt. Whinnery:
Subsequent to the discussion that arose, regarding OPP costs, during your deputation of February 9'h,
Council, at its meeting of April 13, 2005, considered questions to be forwarded to the OPP.
Enclosed, please find questions submitted by Councillors Ralph Hough and Ruth Fountain that
Council approved for submission to the OPP.
When responses to the questions are prepared, please contact Marilyn Pennycook, Clerk, to arrange
a deputation, for yourself and OPP Finance staff. For your convenience, the Township holds both day
and evening meetings. Day meetings are conducted on the 2"d and 4th Wednesdays of the month and
begin at 9:00 a.m. Evening meetings are conducted on the 1st and 3'd Wednesdays of the month and
begin at 7:00 p.m.
Please contact the undersigned, should you have any questions.
Sincerely,
cc: Mayor & Members
Marilyn pennycook, Clerk
/jdi
Enclosures
ORO-MEDONTE TOWNSHIP
MOTION# I ~,
APR 1 3 2005
\J\~.\. "\0
,--Ru c4 \,J\--~
~~r i \ \ ~ 1~()05
MEETING: COUNCIL 0
C. OF W.
Hi Jen.
Here are some of the issues concerning our policing:
1. How many calls for service did we have in 2002, 2003, 2004
2. How many calls for service did Ramara. Severn and Springwater have in the same years
3. What was the cost of policing in 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004 lor Oro-Medonle, Ramara. Severn and Springwater
4. What is the estimated cost for 2005 for the above four municipalities
5. How many officers are 'assigned' to the above municipalities
6. How many hours of actual pro.active palrol were performed in the above four municipalites in 2003, 2004.
7. How many hours of police officers time was used for report writing in 2003 and 2004
8. In 2001 Oro-Medonte build a Sate lite station at Horseshoe Valley at a cost of $600,000 which the O.P.P. took over in
2002. II was estimated by the O.P.P. our policing costs would decrease by approximately $200,000 per year once they
moved into this office. We were advised Ihat much of the savings would come from us not having to pay towards the
Orillia Detachment. which would lead to an increase in costs for Ramara and Severn. Based on this information why did
the cost of policing in Ramara decrease 9.4% in 2002 and in Severn by 1.9% while Oro-Medontes only decreased by
7.6%. Considering it cost $600.000 to build Ihe satelite office and it is cosling approximately $33,000Iyear to run the
office our actual savings are minimal.
9. How many patrol cars and officers were based allhe sate lite office when it opened in 2002
10. How many are based there noW .
11. Considering the cost of living is currently running at about 2.1 % and my OMERS pension for 2005 increased 1.79%
how does the O.P.P. justify and expecled 8% increase in our policing costs lor 2005.
12. How can we reduce our policing costs
13. How would we benefit by entering into a contract
14. Considering that the City of Orillia has 42 'assigned' officers, have a guarenleed 60,000 plus hours of patrol and deal
with over 15000 calls per year at a cost of less than $4 million how does the O.P.P. justify our costs of over $1.6 million
based on the hours of patrol wereceive',fnd the number of calls tor service. I fully realise Orillia has a contract but our
actual cosls per call are approximately.5 Umes higher.
I will have more questions but this is a start.
Ralph Hough '
Councillor,
Ward2
d~
1. Calls for services in Severn, Ramara, City of Orillia.
2. Number of assigned officers Severn, Ramara, City of Orillia.
Ruth Fountain
Councillor
Ward 5
I
.
a.p.p. COSTING SUMMARY
Estimated Policing Costs for the period
January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2004
BARRIE DETACHMENT
Salaries and Benefits
FTE *
$
Uniform Members
Inspector .....,..,.""..,.,',...,.
Staff Sergeant - Detachment Commander. , ,
Staff Sergeant, . . . . , . . . . , ' , . . , , , ' . . . ,
Sergeant. . . , . . ' . . , ' . . ' , , . . . , . . . , . . .
Constables .. . , . . . . . . , . , . ' , , ' . , . , . , ,
Total Uniform Salaries
Overtime (Provincial Average) ,.......""",.."".,.....,..
Contractual Payout (Vacation & Statutory Holidays) .,..... , . . . . , . ,
Shift Premium . . . . . . . . . ' . , . . . . . ' , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Benefits (23.5% of Salaries) .,."....,....,.,.,............
Total Uniforms Salaries & Benefits
Civilian Members
0.41
38,409
1.62
13.77
126,553
955,900
FTE *
1.62
$
66,983
OAG8.,.,... ....,. ...,.., ...,.....
OAG6... .... .....,.,.... ..........
Caretaker 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . , . . . . .
Caretaker 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . .
Communication Operators. . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . , . . . .
Total Civilian Salaries
Benefits (23.5% of Salaries) ,....,..........,..,...........
Total Civilians Salaries & Benefits
15,511
\
\
1,120,862
78,460
32,601
4,740
263,403
1,500,066
82,494
19,386
101,880
Other Direct OperatinQ Expenses
Operational Support. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , , . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . .
Prisoner Guards I Expenses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . , . . .
Vehicle Usage , . , . . . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . .
Telephone ............,.....,.........................,...
Office Supplies .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accommodation. . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , , . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Uniform & Equipment ...... , , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . . .
Furniture & Equipment ..... , . . , . . . . , . , . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cleaning Contract. . . , . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . .
Mobile Radio Equipment Maintenance. . . , . . . . . . . , . . . , . . . . . . . . . . ,
Office Automation. . . . . . . . . , , . . . . , . , . . , . . . . . . . . . . , . . . , . . . . . , .
Total Other Direct Operating Expenses
RHQ Municipal Support
8,087
8,324
92,243
2,543
10,504
2,622
19,681
144,003
25,142
1,771,090
(177,109)
2004 Total Estimated Gross Policing Cost. . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . . . .
Provincial Services Usage. . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . .
. FTE = Full Time Equivalent. Your municipality's portion of the total detachment cost is equivalent to
the FTE shown which is based on your municipality's proportion of the detachment's workload.
O.P,P. COSTING SUMMARY
Actual Policing Costs for the period
January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2004
BARRIE DETACHMENT
Salaries and Benefits
FTE *
0.41
$
40,956
Uniform Members
Inspector .......................,..
Staff Sergeant - Detachment Commander. . .
Staff Sergeant. , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . , . . .
Sergeant. . , . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . .
Constables ....,....... , . . . . . , , . . . . .
Total Uniform Salaries
Overtime (Actual) ,...,..............,......................
Contractual Payout (Vacation & Statutory Holidays) .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Shift Premium .......,.,.....,....................,........
Benefits (23.5% of Salaries) .....,...........,..........,..
Total Uniforms Salaries & Benefits
Civilian Members
1.55
10.87
120,148
677,707
FTE *
1.28
$
53,028
OAG8...... .............,..,......
OAG6..... .............. ..........
Caretaker 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . .
Caretaker 1 . . . . , . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . .
Communication Operators. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . .
Total Civilian Salaries
Benefits (23.5% of Salaries) ....,..................,.......
Total Civilians Salaries & Benefits
12,594
838,811
95,586
43,906
3,825
197,121
65,622
15,421
I
1,179,249
81,044
Other Direct OperatinQ Expenses
Operational Support. , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Prisoner Guards I Expenses. . . . . . . , . . . , . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . .
Vehicle Usage ,............,...........,..,.....,.....,....
Telephone "...............,......"..,......,............
Office Supplies ..,.....................,..,.....,'........
Accommodation. . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . , . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . , . , , .
Uniform & Equipment . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . , . . . . . . .
Furniture & Equipment ..... . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . . , . . . . .
Cleaning Contract. , , . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . , . , . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . .
Mobile Radio Equipment Maintenance, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . , . . . . . .
Office Automation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . .
Total Other Direct Operating Expenses
RHO Municipal Support
6,566
6,759
74,898
2,065
8,529
2,129
15,980
2004 Total Actual Gross Policing Cost. . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . .
Provincial Services Usage. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . , . . . . . , . . , . . . . . . . , . . . . .
Offset Revenues Collected on Behalf of the Municipality. . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . , . . . .
116,926
19,832
1,397,050
(105,198)
(9,459)
* FTE = Full Time Equivalent. Your municipality's portion of the total detachment cost is equivalent to
the FTE shown which is based on your municipality's proportion of the detachment's workload.
-?ouJ.JSt,.,1" of Ol<D - HUo,;.,....
:2.001) 6tJPv<.-r
fOJ-ic'<:.-
"
,
l Ii
, Ii
! , ,
I;
Ii
Ii
;100'
;;;'00'1
~ Ii ~
: ,'I!I I Hi I I,! Ii I ~'" ! I
I : Ii I II i! I I I
II )f'5rJ"1-p Ii +5.,1 1. 1i,5'llpv I! IJJ{,zj,,~g
ii I' I ! II I I! I ' I: I I
.'.!: tJA~I.tsr I" !i 1/~l3qr II t~r:~t
, 'il18ft ili 11(;~:)r"~"! Ii '1'''1''1
!.,,','.', II '(-Ultlli,~lO I;.ll..:a~, €~Pl'~ 'liP, f. .11, r, 53j, :1'~ ',!,:,'I III 3g~I., j'lgl,.
: (,11: Ii! ii i i:: i I !
i I:: I I il Iii: i ! I II I . '
;:"r1 EiA'r'I'f,1YirM€~r~ ili II ,.1 II i..: .,..1
"1!1 I I I lIC'~S-rIf"Hi I:e~, )l771 ' , 1~.5~i
I' Ii ell Jr y.! F.lr~111 I . I II I ~i Jf/~ il I ,~'ml
I"'!' "i I I ' I I i'
,i i~) ,:'!I" II 1 ,I ii' ,Iii I Iii l ! ,!
j, ! 'III I 11-lt,Q,r.:1 +f~O$~
! ' ',' , .
I :(ofS-l! :t'~l'(fAirl-1
i I I i I I i
dOO'fl II~L- I c: l~ I
-P.,11'" r:FrLl;llil'
I I I I I : I:, I
, I II! I ,:1 I .
, , I I ,I I
I I I : I II I
J ~~~I f~~_~L~~. [I --,1-1
i ~~rrt1~ 1 ~~Df I I
.2.to111 tSTi1ltl'E!-- II j ! I
t 0 ~,) I ".11..... r.~ ~,:r of ire:. i
r 11,,\ QJ ~ ..." '
. '1,.,'''1'.1 'I HI.: :: "I,,03ILI
, ji I I ; II I Ii
I II 1 I: i : I II
I III:.' Ii I,' II:
. Ii ill,
I Ii i
I " ....1,,: I Ii
. ... 'Ij"---'- 11'1 . "j 'I!
I II !! I
II II II
II II,
;1(:'.
Ii
Ii
,!
II
I
I
I: I
d i
., I
II I I
II
11...11':1..1
II '
ii I I
II' ,
I' I!
I! II ~1~9"t
II ~~ 11,
L I
Ii !
,
,
,
! 1\:J i
,
<'f) I
I
121 I
. I
122 I
123 Ii I
I "
I :: III
I;~II-t .
in II I
I ;22 Ii I
.. -(
i . Ii
" ;:~j !,'
: i,
::)1,111
.'
1 !<
j:::1 !I
:!
I Ii
~ I !
! ~:n Ii
; I'
i II
i J,j II
1:3:;
13b
',i)
!I
Ii
I!
II
II
Ii
,
I ~)9
PFH:i
-2oc I
!
I
I
..-: "'1
,
,
,
,
!
I
I
-f .1
: ,
II I I
II ~$'9'11'l~~
'I I,.' ,I
II Pit ;i
I:
"
:1
!
I
I II
III
I I:
I "
i II
i d
_ _ u ~
, .
" Itb/~n*-
I.'!.' I
Ii
..,<OD D
,
I !i
I ii
: 1 Ii
I i II
:-j-ij .
, I
Ii
I . i
I II
!,.) -I
, I' ,I I
,!
II I
.,
Ii
Ii
i'
i!
!i
'i
:1
!j
Ii
I' ,
,.Ii. !
II!
"
II
,
II
I'
,
)-( )-r
IREtEIVEbl
MA Y 2 0 2005 I
ORO-MEDONTE
TOWNSHIP
~\
\
May 17, 2005
Mr. Rick Bates,
CAO/Clerk,
Township of Ramara,
P.O. Box 130,
Ramara, ON LOK 1 BO
Ms. Jennifer Zieleniewski,
CAO,
Township of Oro-fvledonte,
P.O. Box 100,
Oro, ON LOL 2XO
Mr. Eric Peterson,
CAO,
Township of Severn,
P.O. Box 159,
Orillia, ON L3V 6J3
Mr. Dan Shilling,
Band Manager,
Mnjikaning First Nation,
5884 Rama Road,
Rama, ON LOK 1 PO
Dear Colleagues:
As you may have read in the local print media, a group of motivated volunteers
who want to help address the housing crisis in our area have launched a local
Habitat for Humanity chapter.
I am enclosing a brochure about Habitat for Humanity, and would encourage you
to visit www.habitat.ca for further information. The newly-formed local chapter
has begun to develop partners within the Orillia area community with the goal of
constructing the first local Habitat home. Some members of the Orillia & District
Construction Association have come on board to assist with locating a site and
coordinating the construction. A local family will be selected and will begin their
"sweat equity" commitment.
On Thursday, September 22nd we are organizing a "Holes for Habitat" fun golf
day at Hawk Ridge Golf & Country Club. Our goal for this inaugural event is
$15,000, which will go directly towards the out-of-pocket costs associated with
building the first home. As indicated on the enclosed flyers, we are currently
seeking community partners to assist us in this event. The City of Orillia has
committed to be a Gold sponsor at $3,000. I am hoping that each of you can
commit to a sponsorship of $500, so that we can show the regional cooperation
and support for this exciting initiative. We would naturally also welcome
contributions for the raffle table and your participation as golfers.
,
1
-2-
I look forward to discussing this opportunity with you further, and please call me
at 329-7240 if you have any questions.
72
Ian C. R. Brown
Habitat for Humanity Golf Tournament
Committee Member
1st Annual Golf Tournament
Thursday
September 22nd, 2005
Hawk Ridge
Golf & Country Club
p!!lll!l1lli.ll ~ i!III!ll!i\!l .. f!!Ii!lllI!l! !!lBlY !ilIi!!l!IllI! i!IiI!l!!!!i ~ ll!.liIIllR ~ ii!SiI!!IIil ~ 8m !lImE !!!!!IIII! ~ .. iE! .. ~.
I I
I I
I I
I I
..wm~~~~~.Rlffil~~~~~~~~~~mwJll!illim!~
Highlights
. $125 per player, includes dinner, cart, prizes
. Registration begins at 12:00 noon.
.
Four person scramble
Shotgun start at 1 :00 pm
Tax receipts available
.
.
Registration
o [Hole ~sponsorshiP:-"--'--$i50-'---1
:Name of sponsor for signage: '
i
!
Method of Payment
o Cheque attached, payable to
Habitat for Humanity
o Visa
Sign up for Golf:
$125 per golfer or $500 per team.
L~___
Golfer 1
--~,~---^'"--"---~
Total:
'Contac'fNa'me-----
Credit Card Number
Golfer 2
Address---""--~-----'---
Signature
Exp. date
Golfer 3
For more information:
Habitat for Humanity Golf
Committee
Undo House-326-2531
367 Old Muskoko Rd.
Orillio, ON l3V 4G6
linannhouse@yahoo.com
_"_____,___ _______ _._____m._
Golfer 4
--,.elephone-----m--------------.-----
Em~'----~.------------
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY GOLF TOURNAMENT
Thursday, September 22,2005 - Hawk Ridge Golf & Country Club
. Corporate Sponsor
Platinum @ $5,000 or more
Gold @ $2,000 to $5,000
Silver @ $1,000 to $2,000
. Golf Hole Sponsor
$150
. Prize Donor
Hole-In-One
Performance Prizes
Raffle Table Prizes
Registrant Gifts
hi
J-O
From: Myles, Ginny
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 10:05 AM
To: Harold Oaynard
Subject: Old Barrie Road through Edgar
Dear Council Members:
There has been a continuing problem in Edgar (since I moved in 15 years ago) of cars and trucks speeding through on Old Barrie
Road. Extending the 50 km/hr zone past Lauder Ave. has not improved the situation at all. It doesn't matter the time of day or
night, most of the traffic barely slows down. Summer Sunday and holiday Monday evenings are particularly bad with cottage
traffic barreling through. This is dangerous and an accident will eventually happen. I intermittently call the police to complain, but
I assume they do not have the resources to continually monitor the situation.
Can we not at least make it a community safety zone to double the fines and regular speed traps? And have the speed indicator
sign there more often as they do in Hillsdale?
Thanks for considering this matter.
Ginny Myles
1074 Old Barrie Rd.
6/17/2005
The Premier
of Ontario
Le Premier ministre
de l'Ontario
ltj
._~
Ontario
Legislative Building
Queen's Park
Toronto, Ontario
M7A 1A1
Edifice de I'Assemblee legislative
Queen's Park
Toronto (Ontario)
M7A 1A1
June 7, 2005
His Worship J. Neil Craig
Mayor
Township of Ora-Medonte
148 Line 7 South
PO Box 100
Ora, Ontario
LOL 2XO
\RECEIVrDl
I JUN 1 3 lQQ~1
ORO-MEDONTE
TOWNSHIP
Dear Mayor Craig:
Thank you for writing to share with me the thoughts of the council of the Township of
Oro-Medonte regarding the challenges facing some of Ontario's farmers. I value your
views and appreciate the time you have taken to make me aware of them.
Ontario's agriculture and food industry is a vitally important sector of our economy, a
sector our government deeply values. I am grateful to our farmers and to others in the
agri-food industry for helping to make it a world leader.
Our government acknowledges and understands that our hard-working farmers are
caught in a crisis - one not of their own making. It is a crisis that is having an impact
on our economy and our rural communities. I have personally - as has my colleague
the Honourable Steve Peters, Minister of Agriculture and Food - met with
representatives of various farming communities. I welcomed the opportunity to hear
first-hand about their experiences, and am grateful to them for making that possible.
My colleagues and I are determined to help our agricultural partners, especially at this
critical time. We have already taken steps to deliver new support to Ontario farmers as
part of our plan to strengthen the economy and our rural communities. Key initiatives
include:
. signing the Agricultural Policy Framework, resulting in an investment of more
than $1.7 billion in Ontario over the five-year life of this federal-provincial
agreement
... 2
- 2 -
. delivering up to $410 million of federal-provincial funding to farmers and areas of
the industry affected by mad cow disease - with as much as $138.5 million
coming from Ontario
. establishing a $7-million mature animal abattoir fund to expand Ontario's overall
slaughter capacity for surplus mature cattle and other ruminant livestock
. providing a total of $167 million under the Market Revenue Insurance program to
grain and oilseed producers for 2004 crops
. setting up a $50-million Tobacco Community Transition Fund to assist tobacco
growers and their communities
. helping approximately 1,200 existing large livestock operations, through $20
million under the Nutrient Management Financial Assistance Program, to better
protect the environment and comply with regulations under the Nutrient
Management Act
. exempting farmers from the new administrative fees associated with water-
taking permit applications (irrigation and frost protection for agricultural
purposes)
. introducing a new model to fund municipal drainage projects with a $6-million
Agricultural Drainage Infrastructure Program
. enabling farmers to claim retail sales tax exemptions when purchasing eligible
farm-related goods, servjces and insurance for their businesses
. requiring that gasoline sold in our province contain an average of five per cent
ethanol by 2007, with the potential to spark 3,000 new jobs and as much as
$500 million in new investment in rural Ontario.
We recognize that the decrease in farm jncome is a national issue and requires a
national solution. For example, grain and oilseed prices are at their lowest in 25 years
due to international market situations. In addition, we are still waiting for the United
States to reopen the border to Canadian cattle. It is essential that we work with the
federal government to find optimal solutions to these problems.
As you may know, Minister Peters brought the concerns of many of our agri-food
partners to the meeting of federal-provincial-territorial ministers of agriculture, held in
early March in Ottawa. We are working to resolve the issues raised, including some of
those that are long-term. Minister Peters has appointed an advisory group to study the
business risk-management system and advise on how to ensure a strong and
sustainable agricultural sector. Ministers Dombrowsky and Peters are also working on
ways to ensure that we can move forward in implementing our nutrient management
plan in a risk-based way that neither places an undue burden on farmers nor
compromises our commitment to safe, clean drinking water.
... 3
- 3 -
Our government believes that our plan to strengthen the economy and our rural
communities is a comprehensive and responsible one - a timely investment in the
future of our farmers. We will continue to stand with our farmers, whose work makes a
tremendous contribution to all Ontarians and to the life of our province.
Thanks again for sharing council's views. I welcome your ongoing input. My colleagues
and I remain committed to doing our utmost to keep our agri-food industry strong,
viable and prosperous.
Yours truly,
(M:..,
Dalton McGuinty
Premier
TKY,J OF Tt
)48 ""A ""
C)'"t. /,
<'is! .
/cf<."f('
May 25, 2005
Dalton McGuinty
Premier of Ontario
Office of the Premier
Legislative Building
Queen's Park
Toronto, ON M7A 1A1
Dear Mr. Premier:
Re: Lonq Term Viabilitv of Ontario Farmers
Council of the Township of Oro-Medonte has been requested to support the Regional Municipality of Niagara in their
recognition of the threat to the long term viability of Ontario farmers.
Niagara has appealed to Queen's Park as well as Ottawa to ensure that the implementation and application of nutrient
management rules are done in a way that addresses the concerns the farm community has repeatedly raised: recognize
that environmental benefits provided by farmers offset any need for administrative charges on water taking permits;
restore confidence of government/farmer partnership by re-establishing long-term investment in drainage infrastructure;
and to immediately implement an action plan to address the farm income crisis.
The Township applauds the Province's efforts to enhance rural infrastructure by introducing a new model to fund
municipal drainage projects. Similarly, the recent exemption granted to farmers from fees for permits to take water
recognizes the role farmers have in the protection of Ontario's water resources through nutrient management and source
protection efforts. Oro-Medonte Township boasts that approximately 50% of the Township is defined as prime agricultural
land by the Provincial Agricultural Land Policy Statement. The remaining 50% is Class 4-7 or organic - some areas of
which currently support active agriculture.
On behalf of Council, and in support of the Regional Municipality of Niagara and the Ontario Federation of Agriculture, I
respectfully request that you commit your government to meet the long-term needs of Ontario farmers and recognize that
recent funding initiatives, although significant, do not address the long-term solutions sought to ensure the viability of
Ontario agriculture.
,/'''
~
/
(//
J. Neil Craig
Mayor
~ ... ,.
_ )~7 ~~
c.c. Members of Council
Ontario Federation of Agriculture
Garfield Dunlop, M.P.P., Simcoe North
~A
NO. 851
P. 2
. 'JUN. 13. 2005 '12: 59PM
905>8!/5'1281 June 10, 2005
1-800-4&.;.0437 '
PI>c 905-853-5881
Jl..MalI; 1Dfo01itea.0D.CI.
Wc:b: .........Jm::a.OA.ca.
. Mr. Jim Woodford
, 29 Huron Woods Drive
. RR#4
Coldwater, ON LOK 1 EO
~'." v:.:r,~~r.>
t_!? ,i.}
"j:"" ,;J~
....;., '\....
t'.f'I'{(J........:
Tel:
120 lIayri.....J>ad:way
Bo" 282
Newmarl<u, Ootarlo
13Y (Xl
A
Watersbed
For
Life
.
s - \
File No.: 2004-SUB-01
IMS No.: PSDC114
Dear Mr. Woodford,
Re:
Natural Heritage Response to "A Critical Assessment of the
Moon Point Environmental 1m act Statemenf'
File No.; 2004-SUB..o1, IMS N .: PSDC114
This letter Is in response to your email dated May , 2005 pertaining to the Moon Point
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). The fol owing responses are numbered to
correspond to the questions contained in your lett r.
1. Ecological Land ClassificatIon (He)
The Authority agrees that the ELC mapping as been completed.
2. ELC Protocol
The Protocol calls for plant species lists to be ompiled for each community. It does
not require that non-vascular plants be invent ried or identified. The ELC work by
the consultants was done in accordance with he protocol (Lee, H., W. Bakowsky,
J. Riley, J. Bowles, M. PUddister, P. Uhl ig and S. McMurray. 1998. Ecological Land
Classification for Southern Ontario: First app xlmatjon and its application. SCSS
Field Guide FG-02. 225 pp).
3. Staff Site Inspection\Three-season Survey
Authority staff (Natural Heritage Bjologist and enior Fisheries Biologist) vjslted the
site in October 2004 prior to receiving the r suits of the field surveys from the
proponent's consultant. The field surveys we conducted In the spring (April 23),
eariy summer (June 11) In the fall, although t e draft report does not state it.
.../Page 2
leA
NO. 851
p, 3
, JUN. 13. 2005 1: OOPM
.
Q)
Mr. Jim Woodford
Re: Moon Point EIS
June 10, 2005
Page 2 0'2
4. Breeding Bird Survey
It appears that there may be a misundersta ding of the intent of the EIS, which is
understandable gjven the way the infor ation has been presented by the
consultant. A brief description of the commu ity is provided In section 2.9.2 and the
list of species is provided In Appendix D. Th breeding bird survey was completed
at an appropriate time of the year (June 11) nd time of day (at dawn - S. Mainguy
pers.oom.). The survey was completed by S rah Mainguy, who provided a CVand
appears to be well qualified to do thjs wo . The Ontario Breeding Bird Atlas
protocols are not used when conducting a b eding bird survey for an EIS as their
standards are much higher and require a gre ter degree of "proof' of breeding (Le.,
carrying nesting material). The breeding bi d surveys conducted for an EIS are
based on the conservative assumptjon that ny bird heard in the subject area is
breeding.
5. Wildli~ Observations
Invertebrates are not typically surveyed unles warranted due to a Natural Heritage
Informatjon Centre (NHIC) record for a sign' Icant species. An amphibian survey
was conducted at an appropriate time of ear and day (at dusk, S. Mainguy,
pars. com.), after first looking for salamander pawn In the ponds.
6. The Blanding's Turtle is designated as "Thre tened" in Ontarjo by the Committee
on the Status of Species At Risk in Ontario (C SSARO). The NHiC database does
not indicate an occurrence record for this s ecies on the subject property. The
report however, indicates that there Is a record for Blanding's Turtle. The consultant
commented that a search for turtles was und rtaken, but nothing was found. The
report is being revised to clarify this issue. A there is no NHIC record for the site,
further site jnvestigatlon for the species is n t warranted based on standard EIS
protocols. If you would like further informati n on COSSARO please contact the
Ministry of Natural Resources as species t risk information is collected and
managed by the province.
Recommendatione:
, Breeding bird surveys are conducted during the breeding bird season in May
through July, not in February as per the sta dard EIS protocols.
. A three-season survey of Invertebrates is g nerally not required, unless there is
an existing NHIC record of a 'significant' jnv rtebrate occurring on the property
or in the area.
...IPage 3
, . JUN. 13. 2005 1: OOPM
.A
~
Mr. Jim Woodford
Re: Moon Point EIS
June 10, 2005
Page 3 of3
.
NO. 851
P. 4
. Non-vascular plants are not generally surv yed, unless there is an existing NHIC
record of a 'significant' non-vascular plant 0 urring on the property or in the area.
. The Authority has no basjs for requesting survey for Blanding's Turtle in June
and July because there Is no NHIC reco d of the species occurring on or in
proximity to the subject property. !
I hope this Information has addressed your con rns. If you have any questions or
require further Information please contact the unde Igned and I will facilitate a response.
I would like to thank you for your Interest in the en lronmental health and quality of Lake
Simcoe and its watershed.
Yours truly,
~
.ftrt.-- D. Gayle Wood, CMM III
Chief Administrative Officer/
Secretary-Treasurer
KB/glc
A CRITICAL ASSESSMENT OF THE
MOON POINT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
A Submission to the LSRCA Board
May 27, 2005
By Jim Woodford
[Background - Oro-Medonte Council voted in a secret meeting to change the zoning
of the Moon Point property from Environmental Protection to Lakeshore
Residential. This Environmental Impact Statement is the only thing preventing the
Council from approving the Moon Point development.]
I was surprised and extremely disappointed to learn that the LSRCA did not order
Watershed Management Ecology and Greenland Consulting Engineers to undertake a
three-season inventory of fish as part of the EIS for a proposed development on the
shores of Lake Simcoe considering the problems facing the Lake Simcoe fishery.
Having said that I will confine my remarks to a critical assessment of what LRSCA did
order the consultants to do and what I found they failed to do.
Field Survey Program (Bold face is LSRCA requirement)
1_ Ecological Land Classification - satisfactorily completed.
2 _ In accordance with the ELC protocol, a full plant list for each community
should be provided. This was not done because only vascular plants were surveyed.
The consulting ecologist ignored non-vasculars such as mushrooms and mosses. etc.
3 _ As this site appears to be forested (it appears that LSRCA staff did not visit
the site prior to writing this report) with potential wetland components, I
recommend that a three-season survey be conducted. There is no evidence that
this was done - few dates appear in the EIS.
4 _ A breeding bird survey should be conducted in the spring. LSRCA staff seems
to be unaware that some owls and hawks begin nesting in February and early March.
The Breeding Bird Survey appears to have been done by an inexperienced consultant.
It would be impossible to visit the site weeklv during April. Mav and June and not
find evidence of at least one species of bird breeding. (! spent 90 minutes on the
Moon Poinl Road on April 26. 2005 and observed a Song Sparrow. on the Moon
Point property, carryin" nestin" material. Accordin" to the Ontario Breedin" Bird
Atlas Protocols this constitutes evidence of breeding.)
5 - Wildlife observations and surveillance should include herptiles.
Wildlife should read Fauna. About 70% of the Fauna is invertebrates - butterflies,
ants, beetles, worms, etc. No surveys were conducted on invertebrates. Yet the
environmental impact on invertebrates will be the same as on birds, mammals and
herotiles.
No serious attempt was made to determine the status of a Provincially Significant
Species - Blanding's Turtle that was reported there by the Natural heritage
Information Centre. Weekly visits during June and July are required - this is when
female turtles might come onshore to lav eggs.
Only two visits in April were made to determine if Amphibians breed on the property.
Love in cold waler happens in Mayas well.
In Section 2.11 Nearshore Habitat the Consultants discuss a 1991 MNR Report on
nearshore fish habitat and the species found there. They state, "There is no evidence
of coldwater fish community production, for example lake whitefish, using nearshore
habitat in this vicinity for either spawning or nursery habitat." Fourteen years later a
study should be undertaken to determine the present status of fish in the area of Four
Mile Point. and answer the question raised by the Consultants. considering the critical
condition of Lake Simcoe coldwater fish.
Recommendations
LRSCA should order Greenland Consultinl! Enl!ineers and Watershed
Manal!ement Ecolol!v to do the followinl! before it approves the Moon Point EIS:
1 _ Undertake a Breeding Bird Survey, startinl! in Februarv. With Qualified
staff. This should include at least weeklv visits and follow the Ontario Breedinl!
Bird Atlas protocols.
2 - Do a three-season survey of the invertebrates.
3 -Do non-vascular plant lists for each community.
4 - Do a survey for B1andinl!'s Turtles in June and July.
5 _ Do an Amphibian Breedinl! Survey in April and Mav, involvinl! weeklv visits.
6 _ The Consultants in Section 2.11 Nearshore Habitat introduced fish into the
EIS. LSRCA should order a three-season assessment offish and fish habitat in
order to update the material presented bv the Consultants.
I was told bv Rov Bridl!e, Chair of LSRCA,
"
.-
If the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority approves the Moon Point
EIS without additional fieldwork it makes a mockerv of their mandate to protect
the Lake Simcoe ecosystem.
,...,
!-y~ - \
AN OPEN LETTER TO LSRCA CHAIR BRIDGE, ORO-MEDONTE MAYOR CRAIG
AND A LETTER TO THE EDITOR
On May 27,2005 I made a deputation to the Board of the Lake Simcoe Region
Conservation Authority to express my concerns that the Environmental Impact Statement
done by the Moon Point Corporation did not comply with the conditions set out in a letter
from K.C. Kennedy of LSRCA 10 Ms. B Clement of Jones Consulting Group on Dec. 18,
2003. (A copy of this letter was obtained under the Freedom of Information Act.)
I was assured by Chair Roy Bridge that further work was being done.
On June 2, 2005 Oro-Medonte received a letter from LSRCA approving the Moon Point
EIS. Four working days after Chair Bridge's assurances.
Some scientific background - "Environment - the sun-oundings of an organism or
species; the ecosystem in which it lives, including both the physical environment and the
other organisms with which it comes in contact." E. O. Wilson. The Diversity of Life
There are some disturbing scientific inconsistencies and lack of ecological knowledge in
the LSRCA Letter.
The Authority's apparent philosophy that only certain Classes, Families and Species will
be harmed by the development has no basis in ecological science. So the Authority
arbitrarily selects target classes to survey.
In a written submission re the Moon Point Application I wrote, "The Township does not
have the staff or consulting expertise to carry out an environmental analysis of the
property."
Nick MacDonald replied, "The Township relies on the LSRCA to carry out reviews of
Environmental Impact Studies on behalf of...Oro-Medonte. It is my opinion and the
opinion of the Township that the LSRCA has the staff expertise to properly assess
and consider applications for development on behalf of Oro-Medonte."
Mayor Craig and Councillors, I respectfully request you carefully consider the following
and then revaluate the Township's relationship with the Lake Simcoe Region
Conservation Authority.
First, "Based on additional technical information provided, we do not consider this
to be a significant wildlife area based on breeding birds." No breeding birds were
found in the one-day survey. (Even the late Roger Tory Peterson would need more than
one day to do a breeding bird survey). There is no scientific data provided to allow
LSRCA sta/fto make this sweeping statement!
~~-
Second, "The technical information provided in the report is satisfactory." It may be
satisfactory but it does not meet the conditions of the Kennedy letter. For example only
vascular plants were surveyed - nol non-vascular - such as mosses, mushrooms, etc. The
ELC Protocols are for land classification - not plant lists.
Third, "The final impact statement prepared by the proponents contains a review of
the fisheries resources on this part of Lake Simcoe." This is an anecdotal summary of
work done in 1991. There have been importanl changes in the condition of Lake Simcoe
in the ensuing 14 years. The proponents should have been required to do a three-season
invenlory of the fish in Lake Simcoe by the proponent's property. The LSRCA itself at a
presentation at the Guthrie Arena, rang the alarm on the desperate need to better protect
and re-establish the natural fish habitat in Lake Simcoe - as opposed to the put-and-take
approach currently practised by the MNR to support the local tourism industry.
Fourth, "The proponents have indicated that the breeding birds using the property
are likely to adapt to habitat changes on the site." No scientific data is provided to
justify this statement. Besides the proponents did not find any breeding birds on the
property. The Township consultant did not notice the inconsistency in the above.
A letter from LSRCA Gayle Wood contains the astonishing statement "Invertebrates
are not typically surveyed unless warranted due to a Natural History Information
centre record for a significant species." Invertebrates make up about 70% of the fauna
and it is astonishing that LSRCA does not routinely require invertebrate monitoring.
They should provide scientific justificalion for this.
In addition LSRCA seems unaware that the Natural History Information Centre is
basically a database. It has not done a province-wide survey of the flora and fauna of
Ontario. So because a species does not appear on the NHIC database does not mean it
does not occur on Moon Point.
Further she writes "The Ontario Breeding Bird Atlas protocols are not used when
conducting a breeding bird survey for an EIS as their standards are much higher
and require a greater degree of "proor' of breeding (i.e. carrying nesting material).
The Authority turns its back on basic ornithological science. What "proof' do they
require?
An interesting twists "...all construction on the site (will) take place in accordance
with the Migratory Bird Convention Act." Spring migration begins in March and lasts
until June. Fall migration begins in August and goes through to October. That leaves just
5 months a year for construction.
Summing up -
. . It is unscientific thinking that only certain classes, families and species of flora
and fauna will be affected by the developmcnt.
. Authority staff does not appear to understand the importance of a detailed
scientific Environmenlal Impacl Study and basic ecological principles.
.
. The consultant selected by the Township to comment on the LSRCA Letter of
Approval did not question any of their recommendations. This suggests my
concern over lack of environmental expertise has considerable merit.
.
. The Township should establish an Ecological Advisory Committee to avoid this
happening again.
It is time for Oro-Medonte to have a full public review of its procedures required to do an
Environmental Impact Study, including the mandatory contents, how the EIS will be
assessed and imporlantly by whom?
Jim Woodford
5{
m.' Original Message .m.
From: !-isa V'L<!tl~m
To: Paui Marshall
Cc: Fred Beck; Sally Mac Don aid ; Steve Peake
Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2005 8:33 PM
Subject: Village Green equipment
Dear Mayor Craig and Oro.Medonte Council:
Councilor Paul Marshall has relayed to us that the township has expressed a willingness to potentially partner with SI.
Thomas' Church in our efforts to update the playground equipment in the Shanty Bay Village Green (that is, the church
would raise 50% ollunds needed for the equipment, and the township would contribute the other 50%).
This letter is to indicate that we are very interested in pursuing such a partnership. We would be happy to discuss details
further with you, at your convenience.
Sincerely,
John E. Anderson
John E. Anderson
Warden
SI. Thomas' Church
612112005
~
11
. .
D
789 9th Line South, R.R.2,
Hawkestone, Ontario
JUN 2 0 2005
ORO-MEDONTE
TOWNSHIP
May 21, 2005
The Council,
Township ofOro-Medonte,
~ \
,
Dear Sirs:
Re: Oro Memorial Park
We are writing to request that something be done about the Canada Goose population at
Oro Memorial Park and beach. The park has been going steadily downhill in the last
few years with the result that we don't even like to use it now. Taking children there is a
health hazard because of the goose droppings, particularly now that they have been
shown to be carriers of the e-coli bacteria.
We certainly don't know what the answer is to keep the geese out, but we know that
there are answers, because it is done in other places, particularly golf courses. Surely if
they can do it, the Township can do it.
The Oro Memorial Park has been a lovely place, in fact one of the jewels of Lake
Simcoe. It is a shame to see one ofthe few public accesses where family picnics and
swimming can take place, befouled with these nuisances, and it is more of a ~'ame that no
attempt has been made to do something about it.
Please take action before another summer is upon us and is spoiled by goose droppings.
OS truly,
/€J~~
Pearl Guthrie
The following local families concur with the above:
itfncf / pl~ 6~<-6~{d ;. /tfI.!-
~-n:~ ~Eid/ ~~
// IlJJA
:f;C1t/lXJt7~~_ {. /'
/~ ;-Z~-? 'c' n\u..jr~
.~J
r 0/ ~
~
()~Y\Nv t- J}<Y\ ~ u.~
~ Sf'" *66Cv\Jt
f
aft: .
"t~<
Kd4
~~
K#M~?t;A1
~r-/'/'/'",dr)y)"'-n~
J
i i __ -~--- -----------~-- --()-- --- -- ~ -
I i n i\ ~.---:-7 --- ~ rC ~
i I ~c.c;;_ _C'<<>-Alo....) __I :::;-~--L-",>__~~\Q-(:)'I\:)~--12.- -- '"'"
i irf\'-\ '-i+r.iE2 ___(\--~~~l_~~~\))~-;S~'-lbt>l.::5
~:O~R hOC ~--------~-- n:---
_ _I I\cJJ-,c _~? L()c~_~jS-- Q:) - L.,. '"-"- " - __\l-T'U,-\'!,>- -~<S&L'" '- ~
-:!h,z~ _~;o~illl- g"ii O""'W" &"~~ ~Ej-'l - g
----IF::'<!;J:k~"'H2~- -fi'<''-- ~ 0;P'- !~-:\ ."ceil)!<
_-~-_~ ~ ~~~ST ~]~~f~-RQ!~!~&~8~
_____I~'c\1ID I\-{ IL0__J-- {'('... -!.)Y'I\ LA",), r0 (,,____""=__\_~\b_;_-l.s-
l\~~~ ~~teA5<C ~\ c-~~HODI~~=To_~S::\(K1)~K-d)
I'iJ'~"''i-ll~,&\GJ~ Ji-I"- ~q~__ll"", ~\,,-;)A>J.D
_________ -r<=- -:J;- fl6~ =- -::r;;.. I::wn:.~ ~<o _~I'0:<~'1P
__ _ _ !! _ \ 0 C;;-,,-,- .;;~ (i..-rr-"5W".)~-t6..e;",-r1l~~-'
---l1k;~oW ~u0~" t' J..("-~~~~-W
___u____!~CC\ & 1- - Q (:)1 A\YC_11~~lQ-...)fLV{wD-
__~~- =lli.", :;),,,,11.-,<0-- - - -- - -- ---- --
__ __ _ nil ~\C ~\.-, EO 5\ ~'C10":; ~<N"'D.. S,,---
_______________\!~-~-~~~~ ~ __u
i 1
, i
I ! -- JESSIE L SINCLAIR
! \ _ 2033L1NE2NRR2
--11- ~.. f~t~[J8AYON
, I
:--=--ljJ!,S2,- - &~=G~'G - ~.f- ------
________\\---- _~ ~ _=____ Qf\'QS_~~11'~~
'i
Ii
.1
\ I
i
. i -~ --- _______n---------- ----
I I f'\0 '-un:: P-P- S 1-\.1\1.:'-:- _ -=G~-,.:,J<:,&-'I..L Q \2-
: I ~---~---\t
, ILL\: 'c>_LrJ C:-- I. S__'J.~':'::Ll"2.9--
iiEl
i!CJ<LQ 8J\~\UO
Ii LC)l.:-~~~Q
i!
Ii
Gf),
-~~-~----
11
Ii
Message
3
Page 1 of2
Chris Carter
From: HR Outcomes [b.sirois@hroutcomes.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2005 8:06 PM
To: neil.craig@oro-meonte.ca; Harry Hughes; Dan Buttineau; Ralph Hough; Paul Marshall; John
Crawford; Ruth Fountain
Cc: Chris Carter; 'Claudia Puchtinger'; 'Dave & Mary Wilkins'; 'Sherrill & Rod Gill'
Subject: Carley Hall
Township of Oro-Medonte Council Members
It was with great disappointment that after over five years, I've had to resign as the a member
of the Board of Directors for Carley Hall. My resignation and that of all previous BoD members
was primarily due to your arbitrary decisions on the financial support and management of
Carley Hall funds.
There are three key points which need to be clarified.
1. The Designation of Operating vs. Capital funds supported by the Township
Over the years, the definition of what would be supported by the Township versus what
would have to be paid from the Hall fund raising and rentals has been a moving target.
Rather than try to explain what it has been in the past as you have frequently changed
your approach and let it slide from year to year, I will identify what should be reasonably
expected by the new Carley Hall BoD.
Any work done on the Hall which improves the asset value (be they structural or considered
decorative) should be a Township responsibility as the Township will directly benefit from
this work. This should include all capital costs identified in the "2005 - 2009 Capital
Forecast". The Capital Costs identified will all directly improve the value of the asset which
you can, at your discretion, sell tomorrow. Since these items are totally at your discretion,
whether they get funded or sold off, they should be your responsibility. Why do you expect
a small body of volunteers to work towards improving township assets... isn't this what our
taxes are for?
2. Your arbitrary decisions concerning the management of Carley Hall funds
The revenues from rentals and fund raising over the years have been submitted to the
Township for application towards the approved annual operating budgets. The revenues
received from rentals (approximately 10% of revenues over the last 10 years) are directly
from the use of Township assets and are clearly a Township discretionary revenue. The
remaining 90% of the revenues however, are from private fundraising and should be held in
trust by the Township for disbursement to jointly approved expenses. That is,
disbursements are approved by the Township and Hall BoDs through the annual operating
budget approval process. Any disbursement beyond the approved budget should require
the approval of both parties before they can be released.
As of the beginning of last year, Carley Hall had a reserve of over $3,700.00 of these
privately raised funds. You should note that, putting aside the conditions established for
6/22/2005
Message
Page 20f2
water testing going forward, I'm disappointed and concerned over the Township's arbitrary
decision to expropriate the Carley Hall reserve funds to pay for last year's water testing.
This was done without concurrence of the Carley Hall BoD. The reserve funds were not
raised for this purpose. It is unacceptable and questionably legal for the Township, on its
own volition, to direct privately raised funds to service a Township debt (a portion of which
was to cover Township employee salaries!). This was not agreed to by those who raised
these funds. As such, you're advised that as a responsible council, you should:
. Restore the reserve funds to the level they would have been at year end without the
water testing charges
. Consider the Operating Budget for 2005 invalid until full discussion on this matter
between the Township and the new Carley Hall BoD has occurred and a new budget
has been resubmitted.
3. Water testing cost going forward
The requirement to ensure safe water is consumed at public facilities and events is prudent
and required by the Province. All that remains is to determine who pays to ensure its safe.
The Council's decision to allocate 50% of the costs to the Halls is inappropriate for the
following reasons:
. This is a Health and Safety requirement for the rental of a Township asset. It can
not be rented without safe water whereas all the water for all fund raising activities
has been and will continue to be brought in for these events. Since only the
Township revenues are affected by the testing requirement, the Township should
cover the total cost.
. By allocating 50% of the cost to the Hall, you've also allocated a portion of the
liability associated with ensuring the water is safe to the Carley BoD. This puts the
BoD in an untenable position in the event of a lawsuit. I doubt that your insurance
will cover the salaries of volunteers if they are required to defend themselves nor
make up for the distress resulting from a lawsuit.
. This allocation of cost puts the few halls that are on well water at a further financial
disadvantage to the community halls on a municipality water system that also have
access to a larger community base for volunteers and potential hall users. This is
very much like kicking a person when they're down.
You should be aware that in addition to the former and current Carley Hall BoD, I will
ensure that representatives of all the Hall BoDs in the Township receive a copy of this
email.
Be clear that this is not an issue that will go away by ignoring it. If necessary to get proper
resolution, particularly as it pertains to the Township's responsibility to ensure safe drinking
water, it's one that will become very public.
Regretfully yours,
Bernard W. Sirois
Former Treasurer - Carley Hall BoD
6/22/2005
~4 )
~ {Ii 1.,
&i"7'fr '7 f,q::A!c fJRC:::/I//J/ff/V <d fi~(t7.
licsc\alcllO l0f(:tleL~ k I
(f'/--" ~ot j,..
.~(~
~~Lu ~'j''-
it ~ .,
Anna. <f WI'S Cr ,lchley- / jf'-lhe./
~~#~l-
~
e..~~
; .~
C) t2 LfJ--f-
[) O/rTllJiY
!~r '\ . . ?
.. Iull/\(y7f>/lV"
L.<'~' bZJ t '-/1./)1
.. I
Za#:1
J~,Jt GcU\"Vv f\i"\..
h,Y~ 0, d~
7'/' I
II!
VJtl(
t::yY1~ f3h;~~(!f'
~n1ilu~~ j(or~Oo...Q ..
~E-CO,..~ (/c1,' iJc"~~
/f~{\
i L ~ , .
I J' Cl~ i I ,J~ )
I, ~lQA~1~
, Alt
pf II!'~
1YJ;(1TYJAJ I "
~~ t/1-Vtf
::;t,i~l (31 ~Wt~
rfi----.L f JL. /~1
\
~. \
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
REPORT
Dept. Report No. To: Committee of the Prepared By:
ADM 2005-024 Whole Jennifer Zieleniewski, CAO
Subject: Department:
Administration
Council
Township of Oro-Medonte
C.ofW. Policies for Human Date: June 22, 2005
Resources Department
Motion # R.M. File #:
Date: RolI#:
II BACKGROUND:
II
The Administration Department is currently in the process of updating the Township's policies
and procedures.
II ANALYSIS:
II
The following Human Resources policies are being presented for Council's consideration.
These policies have been reviewed and approved by Department Heads:
POL-HR-09 [Attachment #1], Township Payment of Memberships/Fees is an update of a 1994
policy ADM 016. Should Council approve the Human Resources policy, the previous
Administrative policy must be rescinded.
POL-HR-12 [Attachment #2] is a new policy titled Floral Tribute / Donations.
POL-HR-13 [Attachment #3] is a new policy titled Code of Conduct.
POL-HR-14 [Attachment #4] is a new policy titled Workplace Harassment.
POL-HR-15 [Attachment #5] is a new policy titled Dress Code.
G
II RECOMMENDATION(S):
II
1 . THAT Report No. ADM 2005-024 be received and adopted.
2. THAT the following Human Resources policies be adopted:
a) That POL-HR-09, Township Payment of Memberships/Fees be adopted and that
ADM-16 be rescinded.
b) That POL-HR-12, Floral/Donations be adopted.
c) That POL-HR-13, Code of Conduct be adopted.
d) That POL-HR-14, Workplace Harassment be adopted.
e) That POL-HR-15, Dress Code be adopted.
Respectfully submitted,
C~ '
.~ ~~ '
~"'.~. '~G ~
. nifer Zielent
CAO
- 2 -
lAT\o.c"'",,'\C~ ~ \ _ \
The Township of Oro-Medonte ?C'o'M~A
Policy
Township Payment of Memberships/Fees
Subject Page 1 of 1 I Policy/Procedure
Section Township Payment of # POL-HR-09
Human Resources Memberships/Fees Enacted By Council:
Policy
a) All work related Membership and Association Fees and Licences may be reimbursed by
the Township as approved by budget annually.
b) It shall be the responsibility of all employees of the Township of Oro-Medonte to ensure
that they are aware of this policy by completing POL-HR-01-Form 1.
.~ \-J
POL-HR-01 FORM 1
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
POLICY/PROCEDURE AWARENESS
The following policy and/or procedure(s) have been explained and
understood:
Policy No.
Procedure No.
Employee's Name (print)
Date
Employee's Signature
Supervisor's Signature
Note: Return original form, once signed, to
Human Resources Officer.
\ -3 (,,,,,,. t~;'
~
Oro-Medonte Township
Section Subject Page 1 of 1 Policy/Procedure
Administration Policy On Township Payment # PP-ADM- 0016
Of Memberships / Fees Enacted By Council;
May 19th, 1994
(a) The Township shoult;ipay for all work related memberships and Association fees for
all Department Heads and Deputies and Members of Council.
Requests for payment of these fees for other staff members should go to Council for
their consideration.
(b) The Township should pay for 50% to a maximum of $250.00 per Department Head or
Deputy for any membership or Association fee which is a requirement in a job
description but not necessarily job related. Once again, requests for similar payments
by other staff members should go to Council f or their consideration.
(c) The Township should not pay for any Association fee or membership for any member
of staff that is not work related or a requirement in a job description.
\\~\.\.-'inX~ ~ 1J -\
The Township of Oro-Medonte ~..~~~!
Policy
Page 1 of 1 I Policy/Procedure
Section Subject # POL-HR-12
Human Resources Floral Recognition / Donation Enacted By Council:
PURPOSE
To establish a Policy for the Township of Oro-Medonte for which the Municipality may provide
floral/donations.
PROCEDURE
For the purposes of this policy immediate family includes:
Parents, step parents, spouse, common-law spouse, same-sex partner, child,
step-children, brother, sister, mother-in-law, father-in-law, brother-in-law, sister-in-law,
grandparent, grandchild, niece or nephew.
The Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte may provide flowers in the following
situations:
Staff:
- illness when short-term disability takes effect;
- employee death
- death of immediate family member, as outlined above.
Council:
- death of Council/Committee Member
- death of former Council/Committee Member
- death of immediate family member, as outlined above.
- illness when second Councilor Committee meeting missed.
Outside:
- at the discretion of the Chief Administrative Officer.
The flowers to be ordered on behalf of the Township of Oro-Medonte Council shall be $75.00
per arrangement or donation to the charity of the family's choice.
Requests for Floral Recognition / Donation is to be made on the attached form Appendix A
and forwarded to the Human Resources Officer to carry out.
'J -J
Appendix" A"
REQUEST FOR FLORAL RECOGNITION / DONA TION
Name of Person
Flower Recognition /
Donation is Being
Sent to:
Funeral Home:
and/or
Address for Delivery:
Requested by:
Type of Tribute:
Approved by CAG:
(or designate)
Date:
2
'\\\\\}"l..\-''\''~~ ~ ~~\
The Township of Oro-Medonte '?~O~~~
Policy
Section
Human Resources
Subject
Code of Conduct
Page 1 of 2
Policy/Procedure
# POL-HR-13
Enacted By Council:
PURPOSE
All employees of the Township of Oro-Medonte will adhere to the Code of Conduct to ensure
that there is no conflict between their personal interests and official duties. Failure to comply
with any of these procedures will expose an employee to disciplinary action and/or action
through the Courts.
PROCEDURE:
CONDITION OF EMPLOYMENT
Responsibility for an employee's conduct lies with the individual and compliance with this
policy is a condition of employment.
PRINCIPLES OF CONDUCT
1. Employees will promote the goals, objectives, and policies of the Township of Oro-
Medonte.
2. Employees will acknowledge and recognize the dignity and worth of others with
respect to their duties.
3. Employees will accord, in the performance of official duties, equality of treatment to all
persons and, without restricting the generality of the foregoing, shall refrain from
according preferential treatment to any person, group, or organization.
4. Employees will not benefit from the use of information acquired or used, and that is not
generally available to the public, during the course of official duties.
5. Employees will not, except as specifically provided by policy, use Municipal property or
equipment for activities or purposes not associated with the discharge of official duties.
6. Employees, their immediate family, and family members residing in -their household,
may not sell goods, materials, or services to the Municipality without the express
permission of the Chief Administrative Officer.
7. Employees will not engage in any business dealing, or transaction or have a financial
or other personal interest, which is in conflict with the discharge of their official duties
included in their job descriptions.
~~-~
8. Employees will not place themselves in a position where they could derive any benefit
or gain from any Municipal contracts, persons, groups, companies, or organizations
with which the Municipality does business.
9. Employees will not engage in any outside work, private employment, business, or
undertaking for any person, group, or organization, which might interfere or appear to
interfere with their duties as a Municipal employee, without the prior written approval of
their Department Head and the Chief Administrative Officer.
GIFTS
10. Employees shall not accept gifts that are given in anticipation of special consideration
by the Municipality.
RULES OF DISCLOSURE
11. Employees will disclose in writing to their Department Head and the Chief
Administrative Officer any business, commercial, or financial interest where such
interest might be construed as being in actual or potential conflict with their official
duties; and shall abide by the advice given. Upon approval, the written disclosure will
be kept in the employee's personnel file for the duration of the activity.
COMPLAINT PROCEDURE
12. Any person who feels an employee has violated the terms of this policy is required to
make written complaint to the Chief Administrative Officer.
CONTRAVENTION
13. Contravention of any of the provisions of these principles of conduct and rules for
disclosure will be cause for discipline up to and including dismissal according to the
djscipline policy under the Collective Agreement.
RESPONSIBILITY
14. It shall be the responsibility of all employees of the Township of Oro-Medonte to
ensure that they are aware of this policy by completing POL-HR-01-Form 1.
2
Page 1 of 1 I Policy/Procedure
Section Subject # POL-HR-14
Human Resources Workplace Harassment Enacted By Council:
PURPOSE
The Township of Oro-Medonte recognizes the right of every employee to work in an
environment that is free from discrimination and harassment, by the employer, agent of the
employer, another employee, or any other person with whom she/he comes into contact in
the normal performance of his/her duties. Any such harassment will be regarded as a
serious offence and is subject to disciplinary action.
POLICY
The Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte will abide by the requirements as per the
Human Rights Code.
Contravention of any of the provision of this workplace harassment policy will be cause for
discipline according to the Township discipline policy.
It shall be the responsibility of all employees of the Township of Oro-Medonte to ensure that
they are aware of this policy by completing POL-HR-01-Form 1.
\\'\\0. c'-'.w,\:,,\ '\5
The Township of Oro-Medonte ~r~eA
I
Policy
Page 1 of 1 I Policy/Procedure
Section Subject # POL-HR-15
Human Resources Dress Code Enacted By Council:
PURPOSE
To provide guidelines with respect to suitable attire in order to project a neat, professional
and safety conscious manner appropriate to be worn by employees whilst performing the
duties assigned to their position.
POLICY
This policy shall apply to all full-time, part-time, volunteer firefighters, contract and seasonal
employees.
The employees of the Township of Oro-Medonte are to present themselves to the public in a
manner which reflects the professionalism of the organization, dressing in a neat,
professional and safely conscious manner.
The Municipality is committed to providing and maintaining a safe healthy workplace
environment by requiring employees to wear safely apparel appropriate to the duties
assigned to their position.
Professional business attire is required to be worn on a day to day basis.
Contravention of any of the provisions of this dress code will be cause for discipline according
to the Township discipline policy.
It shall be the responsibility of all employees of the Township of Oro-Medonte to ensure that
they are aware of this policy by completing POL-HR-01-Form 1.
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
REPORT
Dept. Report No. TR2005-12 To: Committee of the Whole Prepared By: Paul Gravelle
Subject: Renewal of Banking Department: Treasury
Services Agreement
Council
C.ofW. Date: June 17, 2005
Motion # R.M. File #:
Date: RolI#:
II BACKGROUND:
II
In June 2000, the municipality entered into a five year agreement with the Bank of Montreal for the
provision of banking services. The agreement resulted in interest being paid on our account at Prime
less 1.75%. All services charges were waived.
The Bank of Montreal has presented us with the following three renewal options:
Option 1:
Interest paid at Prime less 1,75%
Account activity fees discounted 85% from standard pricing (based on current activity, charges would
be approximately $100/month)
Cash management services (based on current activity, charges would be approximately $255/month)
Option 2:
Interest paid at Prime less 1.80%
Account activity fees will be waived
Cash management services costs of approximately $255/month
Option 3:
Interest paid at Prime less 1.84%
Account activity fees will be waived
Cash management services costs waived
Account activity fees relate to deposits made, cheques in deposit, cash and coin in deposit, cheques
issued, monthly statements, returned items, electronic debits and credits and stop payments.
Cash management services relate to transfer of pre-authorized payment files & payroll files, access
to account information, payroll remittance payments & corporate bill payments electronically,
II ANALYSIS:
II
Please find below an analysis of the said three options in comparison to 2004:
2004
Option 1
Option 2
Option 3
Interest earned
$180,178
$180,178
$176,183
$172,987
Less:
Account activity charges
nil
$ 1,200
nil
nil
Cash Management
Services fees
nil
$ 3,060
$175,918
$ -4,260
$ 3,060
$173,123
$ -7,055
nil
Net interest revenue
$180,178
$172,987
$ -7,191
Difference from 2004
It must be remembered that the charges reflected above are based on current activity levels, The
number of taxpayers enrolling in the pre-authorized payment plan continues to increase annually,
With cash management services being converted to internet based rather than the cumbersome
modem system presently in use, these services will be used to a greater extent, especially in the
transfer of funds electronically rather than the issuance of a cheque, investing of funds on a short
term, etc, Service charge levels will likely increase, As such, we would recommend Option 3 as the
preferred option, Services charges are avoided, The loss of 9 basis points in the interest rate may be
recovered from other investment activity,
The proposed agreement is for a period of two years rather than the normal five years, Significant
changes are forthcoming in the way cheques are processed. The bank is therefore only able to
provide the proposed costing for a two year period, Costing will be revised subsequently to reflect the
effect of cheque imaging, etc,
Inviting proposals from other financial institutions was considered, We respectfully suggest that the
interest rate offered could be matched but not exceeded by other financial institutions,
The level of service provided by the bank of Montreal has been acceptable. As such, we would
recommend renewing with the Bank of Montreal for the proposed two year period, Once all financial
institutions have converted to the Canadian Payments Association's requirements ( present deadline
is December 31, 2006), proposals could be invited,
- 2 -
II RECOMMENDATION(S):
I\j) \:1 - 1)
II
1. THAT Report No, TR2005-12 be received and adopted,
2. THAT the municipality renew its banking services agreement with the Bank of Montreal for the
period of June 30, 2005 to June 30, 2007 at the following terms:
interest paid on account of Prime - 1.84%
all service charges waived
Respectfully submitted,
Paul Gravelle
Treasurer
C.A.O. Comments:
Date: ~'-~
o
11 (0 ,(
!
C.A.O.
<Y V" c.JJJG
V
Dept. Head
- 3 -
.
I
~I
I
Dept. Report No. TR2005.13 To: Committee of the Whole Prepared By: Paul Gravelle
Subject: Renewal of Department: Treasury
Insurance coverage
Council
C.ofW. Date: June 17, 2005
Motion # R.M. File #:
Date: RolI#:
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
REPORT
I BACKGROUND:
I
The municipality's present insurance coverage expires on July 1st, 2005. Our present insurers, Frank
Cowan Company Limited, have provided the municipality a renewal proposal.
II ANALYSIS:
~
All coverage and deductible levels remain constant with our current coverage.
The proposed premiums including PST are $193,818.68. 2004 premiums were $182,576 and the
2005 budget estimates reflect premiums of $188,735, The 2005 percentage increase is 6.16%.
When proposals were requested in 2004, the following quotes were received from other insurers:
Ontario Municipal Insurance Exchange
Jardine Lloyd Thompson Canada Limited
$230,834
$254,537
It is our understanding that other municipalities are experiencing premium increases of 25% to 40%,
As such, we would recommend that the municipality renew its insurance coverage with Frank Cowan
Company Limited.
II RECOMMENDATION(S):
I
\j)C~
II
1. THAT Report No.TR2005-13 be received and adopted.
2. THAT the Township of Oro-Medonte renew its insurance coverage for the period of July 1,2005 to
July 1, 2006 at the quoted premium of $193,818,68 including PST.
Respectfully submitted,
~uJ2 ~~
Paul Gravelle
Treasurer
C.A.O. Comments:
Date'~ (IcJ)~
~AvLLl~
CAO.
v
Dept. Head
- 2-
.
THE CORPORATION OF THE
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
AND
AND ITS LOCAL 2380
CANADIAN UNION OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES
COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2005-2008
T ABLE OF CONTENTS
ARTICLE
ARTICLE 1 - PURPOSE
ARTICLE 2 - RECOGNITION
ARTICLE 3 . INTERPRETATION
ARTICLE 4 - MANAGEMENT RIGHTS
ARTICLE 5 - RELATIONSHIP
ARTICLE 6 . ACQUAINTING NEW EMPLOYEE WITH
COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT
ARTICLE7 -CORRESPONDENCE
ARTICLE 8 - LABOUR MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE
ARTICLE 9 - REPRESENTATION
ARTICLE 10 - NO STRIKE, NO LOCKOUT
ARTICLE 11- GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE
ARTICLE 12 - DISCIPLINE AND DISCHARGE
ARTICLE 13 - SENIORITY
ARTICLE 14 - JOB POSTING, PROMOTION AND TRANSFER
ARTICLE 15 - LAYOFF AND RECALL
ARTICLE 16 - HOURS OF WORK
ARTICLE 17 - OVERTIME
ARTICLE 18 - PUBLIC HOLIDAYS
ARTICLE 19- VACATIONS
ARTICLE 20 - SICK LEAVE
ARTICLE21-ATTENDANCE
ARTICLE 22 - LEAVES
ARTICLE 23 - WAGES AND ALLOWANCES
ARTICLE 24 - BENEFITS
ARTICLE 25 - HEALTH AND SAFETY COMMITTEE
ARTICLE 26 - BULLETIN BOARD
ARTICLE 27 - ALTERATION OR AMENDMENT
ARTICLE 28 - JOB SECURITY
ARTICLE 29 - TERM OF AGREEMENT
W AGE SALARY SCHEDULE - 2005
WAGE SALARY SCHEDULE-2006
WAGE SALARY SCHEDULE - 2007
NOTE APPLICABLE TO WAGE/SALARY SCHEDULE
LETTER OF UNDERSTANDING
LETTER OF UNDERSTANDING
LETTER OF UNDERSTANDING
LETTER OF UNDERSTANDING
POLICY REGARDING SELF-INSURANCE OF VISION CARE
VISION CARE REIMBURSEMENT EXPENSE FORM
PAGE #
3
3
3
4
5
5
5
5
5
6
6
8
9
10
11
11
12
13
14
15
15
16
17
17
18
19
19
19
19
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
2 of 30
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
AND
CANADIAN UNION OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES
AND ITS LOCAL 2380
ARTICLE 1 - PURPOSE
1.01 The purpose of this Agreement is to provide for a collective bargaining
relationship between the Corporation and the Union with respect to the bargaining unit described
herein, to secure the prompt disposition of grievances, and to promote the efficient and
responsible operation of the Corporation's business and activities,
ARTICLE 2 - RECOGNITION
2.01 The Corporation recognizes the Union as the exclusive bargaining agent with
respect to all matters covered by this Agreement for all employees of the Corporation of the
Township of Oro-Medonte save and except foreperson, persons above the rank of foreperson,
administrative secretary, students employed during the school vacation period and students
employed on a cooperative or government sponsored work program with a community college,
2.02 The Union's National Representative is entitled to be present at meetings with the
Corporation relating to the grievance procedure, arbitrations, collective bargaining, whenever
otherwise entitled under relevant labour legislation, and at any other time as mutually agreed by
the parties,
ARTICLE 3 - INTERPRETATION
3.01
"Days" shall mean calendar days, unless otherwise specified,
The word "employee" or "employees" whenever used in this Agreement, shall
mean only the employees in the bargaining unit defined herein,
The "probationary period" for a new employee is ninety (90) days from the date of
hire,
"Steward" is an employee elected by the Union members and duly accredited in
writing as authorized to represent an employee( s) in presenting a grievance to the
Corporation,
The words "temporary employee" connote an employee hired on a temporary
basis not to exceed one hundred and thirty (130) days in a twelve (12) month
period, or an employee that is filling in for a permanent employee absent as a
result of illness, injury or leave of absence,
3 of 30
3.02
interpreted
requires,
Whenever the singular or masculine gender is used in this Agreement it shall be
as if the plural or feminine has been used where the context of the language so
3.03 (a) The Employer agrees to notify the Union upon hiring a temporary employee and
to advise the union whether the temporary employee is:
(a) filling in for a permanent employee absent as a result of illness, injury or
leave of absence as per Article 3,01; or
(b) is being hired on a temporary basis not to exceed 130 days in a 12 month
period as per Article 3,01.
3.03 (b) In the event that paragraph 3,03 (a) above applies, the Employer will notify the
Union of the name of the permanent employee being replaced on a fill-in basis and will notify the
Union when the permanent employee returns to work,
3.03 (c) In the event that paragraph 3,03 (b) applies the Employer shall continue within the
bounds of its past practice and will not work the temporary employee for more than 130 days
during the 12 month period commencing with the date of hire, or in any subsequent 12 month
period, In the event the Employer requires that temporary employee to work more than 130 days
in the 12 month period, the Employer will notify the Union and seek the Union's mutual
agreement to extend the period, which shall not be unreasonably withheld,
ARTICLE 4 - MANAGEMENT RIGHTS
4.01 The Union recognizes and acknowledges that the management of the Corporation
and the direction of the working forces are fixed exclusively in the Corporation, Without
restricting the generality of the foregoing, the Union acknowledges that it is the exclusive
function of the Corporation to:
(a) Maintain order, discipline and efficiency;
(b) Hire, promote, demote, classify, transfer and retire employees;
(c) Discipline or discharge a probationary employee for just cause;
(d) Discipline or discharge regular employees for just cause;
(e) Make, enforce and alter, from time to time, rules and regulations to be observed by the
employees, provided such rules and regulations do not conflict with the provisions of this
Collective Agreement;
(f) Determine the nature and kind of business and activities conducted by the Corporation,
machinery and equipment to be used, the methods and techniques of work, the content of
jobs, the scheduling of work, the scheduling of employees including the scheduling of shifts
and overtime, the number of employees to be employed, the extension, limitation, curtailment
or cessation of operations or any part thereof, the standards of performance of employees, and
to determine and exercise all other functions and prerogatives;
(g) To set qualifications and establish and administer tests for the purpose of assisting the
Corporation in determining employees' qualifications in relation to job postings for
promotion and transfers;
(h) And, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, generally to manage the Corporation,
40f30
ARTICLE 5 - RELATIONSHIP
5.01 The Employer shall deduct from the wages of employees the amount of regular
Union dues payable to the Union, "Regular Union dues" is as defined in the Labour Relations
Act, R,S,O, 1990, C,L.2 as amended,
5.02 The parties agree to a mandatory irrevocable check off of regular Union dues from
the pay of all bargaining unit employees, Deductions shall be made from the bi-weekly payroll
period, It shall be forwarded to the Secretary Treasurer of the Union local no later than the
fifteenth (1Sth) day of the month following, accompanied by a list of names of all employees
from whose wages the deductions have been made,
5.03 The Union shall indemnify and save the Corporation harmless from any claims,
suits, judgments, attachments and from any other form of liability as a result of the Corporation
making any deductions in accordance with the foregoing authorizations and assignments, The
Union will make refunds directly to all employees from whom wrongful deductions have been
made,
ARTICLE 6 - ACQUAINTING NEW EMPLOYEE WITH COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT
6.01 The Corporation agrees to acquaint new employees with the fact that a Collective
Agreement is in effect.
ARTICLE 7 - CORRESPONDENCE
7.01 Unless otherwise specified in this Agreement, correspondence between the
Corporation and the Union shall pass between the Chief Administrative Officer and Vice
President of the Union local.
ARTICLE 8 - LABOUR MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE
8.01 A Labour Management Committee shall be established conslstmg of two (2)
representatives of the Union and two (2) representatives of the Corporation, The Committee
shall meet once every two (2) months to discuss issues relating to the workplace which affect the
parties, Committee members shall receive a notice and an agenda prepared by the Chief
Administrative Officer at least forty-eight (48) hours in advance of the meeting, The Union shall
inform the Chief Administrative Officer of agenda items not later than forty-eight (48) hours in
advance of the agenda deadline, Union committee members shall not suffer any loss of pay for
having attended a meeting,
ARTICLE 9 - REPRESENTATION
9.01
Negotiating Committee
The Corporation shall recognize a Negotiating Committee composed of not more than two (2)
employees selected by the Union,
5of30
9.02 Bargaining unit members of the Negotiating Committee shall not suffer a loss of
payor benefits when meeting with the Corporation,
9.03 Stewards
In order to provide an orderly and expeditious procedure for the disposition of a grievance, the
Corporation acknowledges the right of a Union to elect or appoint not more than two (2)
Stewards, Subject to the following considerations, a Steward shall assist any bargaining unit
member in preparing and presenting his grievance in accordance with the Collective Agreement.
9.04
Notification of Identity
(a) The Union shall notify the Corporation in writing of the names of its Stewards, Officers
and Officials, The Union shall notify the Corporation of any and all changes in this regard, The
Corporation shall not be required to recognize a Steward, Officer or Official until his name has
been provided by the Union to the Corporation in writing,
(b) The Corporation shall, if requested, supply the Union with a list of its supervisory or
other personnel with whom the Union may be required to transact business,
9.05
Servicing Grievances
It is understood that a Steward has Corporation work to perform, Accordingly, the Steward shall
normally service grievances outside of regular working hours, If it is necessary to service a
grievance during working hours, he will not leave his work without first obtaining the permission
of his immediate supervisor. Permission shall not be unreasonably withheld, In requesting such
permission, the Steward shall state his destination to his immediate supervisor and report again to
him at the time of his return to work, In accordance with this understanding, if the Steward deals
with grievances during his regular hours of work he shall only be paid for a reasonable amount of
time so spent. What is reasonable, is to be determined by the immediate supervisor.
ARTICLE ]0 - NO STRIKE, NO LOCKOUT
]0.0]
operate,
There shall be no strikes or lockouts so long as this Agreement continues to
ARTICLE]] - GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE
]1.0] A grievance is a difference between the parties relating to the interpretation,
application, administration, or alleged violation of the Collective Agreement.
] 1.02 The parties agree that it is of utmost importance that grievances be addressed as
quickly as possible,
11.03 No employee shall have a grievance until the employee has given his immediate
supervisor an opportunity to resolve the complaint.
11.04 If an employee has a complaint, he shall discuss it with his immediate supervisor
within three (3) working days (and before 12:00 Noon on the third day) of the occurrence, or
origin of the circumstances giving rise to the complaint, in order to afford his supervisor an
opportunity to resolve the complaint. The employee and his supervisor shall meet to discuss the
6 of 30
complaint and the supervisor shall respond to the complaint within seven (7) working days of the
meeting, The employee may request the presence of a Steward,
11.05 Failing adjustment of the complaint to the mutual satisfaction of the employee and
the supervisor, the employee may grieve, A complaint shall be considered a grievance if it is
produced in writing, signed and dated by the employee and a Steward, and presented by a
Steward to the Chief Administrative Officer prior to 12:00 Noon and no later than three (3)
working days after the supervisor's response in Article 11,04,
11.06 When the Chief Administrative Officer receives the grievance, he shall arrange a
grievance meeting with the Union to discuss the grievance within seven (7) working days of
receiving it, or such longer period as may be mutually agreed upon to accommodate the parties,
The Chief Administrative Officer, or hislher designate, will provide the Union with a decision in
writing within seven (7) working days of the grievance meeting, Union representation shall
consist of the National Representative, and not more than one Steward, Upon mutual agreement
of the parties the grievor may be excused from attending the meeting,
11.07 In the event any difference arising from the interpretation, application,
administration or alleged contravention of this Agreement has not been satisfactorily settled
under the foregoing procedure, the matter may then be referred to arbitration as hereinafter
provided, The Union shall provide the employer with a copy of its written notice referring the
matter to arbitration, No matter may be referred to arbitration beyond seven (7) working days of
the receipt of the written response from the Chief Administrative Officer as specified in Article
11.06,
11.08 Any matter so referred to arbitration, including any question as to whether a
matter is arbitrable, shall be heard by a Board of three (3) members composed of a Chair and a
nominee appointed by each of the Corporation and the Union, The notice of the party referring
the decision to arbitration shall contain the name of its nominee to the Arbitration Board, The
recipient of the notice shall within fourteen (14) days advise the other party of the names of its
nominee, The two (2) nominees so appointed shall, within fourteen (14) days of the appointment
of the second of them, appoint a third person who shall be the impartial Chair. If the recipient of
the notice fails to appoint a nominee, or if the two (2) nominees fail to agree upon a chair, within
these time limits, the appointment shall be made by the Minister of Labour upon the requests of
either party, The Arbitration Board shall hear and determine the matter and shall issue a
decision, The decision shall be final and binding upon the parties and upon any employee
affected by it. The decision of a majority shall be the decision of the Arbitration Board, but if
there is no majority, the decision of the Chair will govern,
11.09 The Arbitration Board shall not be authorized to alter, modify, or amend any of
the terms of this Agreement, nor to make any decision inconsistent therewith,
11.10 The Corporation and the Union shall each pay one-half (1/2) of the fees and
expenses of the Chair of the Arbitration Board and shall each pay the fees and expenses of their
nommee.
11.11
arbitration
parties,
It is agreed by the parties that the time limits set out with respect to grievances and
are mandatory and must be adhered to unless mutually agreed otherwise by the
7 of 30
11.12 Where no reply is given to a grievance within the time limits specified, the Union
or the Corporation may submit the grievance to the next step in the Grievance Procedure,
11.13 Where the Arbitration Board determines that a disciplinary penalty or discharge is
excessive, it may substitute such other penalty for the discipline or discharge as it considers
appropriate in the circumstances,
11.14 The Corporation has the right to file a grievance with respect to the interpretation,
application, administration or alleged contravention of the Agreement by the Union, Such
grievance shall be presented in writing, signed by the Chief Administrative Officer or his/her
designate, and handed to the President of the Local within seven (7) working days of the
occurrence or origination of the circumstances giving rise to the grievance, Failing settlement, a
meeting will be held with the Union and the National Representative, and the Union shall give its
written reply to the grievance within seven (7) working days following the meeting, Failing
settlement, such grievance may be referred to arbitration under this Article within fourteen (14)
working days of the date the Corporation received the Union's reply,
11.15 The Union shall have the right to file a grievance based on a difference with the
Corporation arising out of the interpretation, application, administration or alleged contravention
of the Agreement. Such grievance shall not include any matters which can only be raised as a
personal grievance,
Such grievance shall be submitted in writing by the Union to the Chief Administrative Officer
within seven (7) working days of the occurrence or origination of the circumstances giving rise to
the grievance, Failing settlement, a meeting will be held with the Union within seven (7)
working days of the presentation of the grievance and the Corporation shall give the Union its
written reply to the grievance within seven (7) working days of the meeting or such longer period
as may be mutually agreed upon to accommodate the parties, Failing settlement, such a
grievance may be referred to arbitration under this Article within fourteen (14) working days of
the date the Union received the Corporation's reply,
11.16 The Union Local's President and a Steward shall not suffer a loss of payor
benefits when meeting with the Corporation at grievance meetings,
11.17 The grievor and the Steward shall not suffer a loss of payor benefits while
attending a grievance arbitration involving this Local.
ARTICLE 12 - DISCIPLINE AND DISCHARGE
12.01 Employees Who Have Completed Probationary Period
No Employee shall be disciplined or discharged without just cause,
12.02
Probationary Employees
The Corporation may, in its discretion, terminate a probationary employee provided only that
such discretion shall not be exercised in a manner that is in bad faith,
12.03 Prior to the imposition of discipline or discharge, an employee shall be given
reason in the presence of his/her Steward or Union Representative, if so requested by the
8 of30
employee, Such employee shall be advised promptly in writing by the Chief Administrative
Officer or his designate of the reason for such discipline or discharge,
12.04 (a) An employee is entitled to review his personnel file in the presence of a
Corporation representative, The employee must provide the Chief Administrative Officer forty-
eight (48) hours notice of the intended review and a mutually convenient time will be
established,
(b) Disciplinary notices shall be retained in an employee's file, However, if a period
of twenty-four months has passed since the last such notice, the preceding disciplinary notice
shall not be relied upon by the Corporation in assessing appropriate discipline,
ARTICLE 13 - SENIORITY
13.01 Seniority is the length of service with the Corporation since the last date of hire,
For purposes of layoff, recall, job posting and promotion, seniority shall be on a departmental
basis, ln all other cases, seniority shall operate on a bargaining unit-wide basis,
13.02
Senioritv List
The Corporation shall maintain a seniority list showing the date upon which each employee's
service commenced, Where two (2) or more employees commenced work on the same day,
preference shall be in accordance with the date of application for employment. An up-to-date
seniority list shall be sent to the Union and posted on all bulletin boards in January of each year.
13.03
Loss of Seniority
Seniority shall terminate, and the employee shall be deemed to have quit, when the employee:
(a) resigns from the employ of the Corporation;
(b) retires, or is retired;
(c) is discharged for just cause and is not subsequently reinstated through the grievance or
arbitration procedures in this agreement;
(d) is off work due to layoff for a period of twelve (12) months;
(e) is absent without leave for three (3) consecutive working days during which time he has
failed to contact his immediate supervisor. It is the responsibility of the employee to provide
an explanation satisfactory to the Corporation;
(D fails to report to work within five (5) working days after being notified by the Corporation of
a recall;
(g) fails to return to work upon termination of an authorized leave of absence unless a reason
acceptable to the Corporation is given,
13.04
Transfer Outside of the Bargaining Unit
(a) No employee shall be transferred to a position outside the bargaining unit without his
consent,
(b) If an employee is transferred to a position outside of the bargaining unit, he shall retain his
seniority up to six (6) months but not thereafter. Such employees shall continue to pay
union dues at their last unionized rate.
9 of 30
13.05 Temporary Employees
Employees hired on a temporary basis, as defined in Article 3,01, are not subject to the seniority
provisions of this Agreement.
13.06
Probationary Emplovees
Probationary employees are not subject to the seniority provisions of this Agreement, with the
exception of Article 12,02, Upon successful completion of the probationary period, an
employee's name shall be placed on the seniority list with a service date indicating the date of
most recent hire,
13.07 Former Medonte Emplovees
Current members of the bargaining unit who were employed by the former township of Medonte
("Medonte") as of December 31,1993, shall receive full credit for continuous employment with
Medonte, as per the language of the Collective Agreement,
ARTICLE 14 - .JOB POSTING, PROMOTION AND TRANSFER
14.01 Job Postings
When a new position is created within the bargaining unit, or where in the view of the
Corporation a vacancy occurs, the Corporation shall post notice of the position on a department
bulletin board for a period of seven (7) working days to notify employees of the new position or
vacancy and to invite written application within the time period,
14.02
Such notice shall contain the following information:
(a) number of positions to be filled;
(b) title and description of position;
(c) qualifications and knowledge required;
(d) wage rate or range; and
(e) final date by which application must be received by the Corporation,
14.03 To be considered for the posted pOSItIOn an employee must make written
application no later than the final date indicated in the notice,
14.04 In cases of promotion to bargaining unit positions, the following factors shall be
considered:
(a) skill, ability, knowledge and qualifications;
(b) seniority,
Where the criteria referred to in factor (a) are relatively equal, factor (b) will govern,
10 of 30
14.05
Notification to Union
Within seven (7) calendar days of the date of appointment pursuant to this Article, the name of
the successful applicant shall be sent to the Union, and a copy of this notice posted on a bulletin
board,
14.06
Trial Period
An employee who is the successful applicant for a promotion shall be confirmed in the position
subject to satisfactory completion of a twenty (20) working day trial period, Where the
Corporation determines that an employee has failed to satisfy the requirements of the position
into which he has posted, he shall be returned to his former job classification,
14.07 No outside applicant for a posted position shall be hired until it is determined that
none of the applicants from the bargaining unit is capable of being promoted pursuant to Article
14,04,
ARTICLE 15 - LAYOFF AND RECALL
15.01
Lavoff Procedure
Layoffs shall be in inverse order of seniority on a departmental basis provided that the remaining
employees have the qualifications and ability to perform the work available,
15.02 Employees who have been laid off in accordance with this Article shall be
recalled in order of seniority, provided they have the qualifications and ability to perform the
work available, This provision shall not operate where an employee's right to be recalled has
been extinguished pursuant to Article 13,03(d),
15.03 It is the responsibility of an employee on layoff to keep the Corporation advised,
in writing, of his current address, The Corporation shall be deemed to have given an individual
on layoff notice of recall by sending notice of recall by registered mail to the last address
supplied to the Corporation by the individual. Such notice shall state the date and time that the
individual is required to report to work, Such notice shall be deemed to have been received on
the third working day after it has been sent by the Corporation,
15.04 The Corporation shall not hire a new employee to perform work in the
circumstance where there is an employee on layoff that is willing, qualified and able to perform
the work,
15.05 A grievance as to layoff or recall shall be initiated at the grievance procedure step
described in Article 11.06,
ARTICLE 16 - HOURS OF WORK
16.01
The scheduling of work is within the discretion of the Corporation,
Ilof30
16.02
Roads Department
Winter hours of forty (40) hours per week shall commence the Tuesday following Labour Day
and end the first Monday in May, Hours to be worked in five (5) - eight (8) hour shifts,
Summer hours of forty (40) hours per week shall commence the first Monday in May and end the
Tuesday following the Labour Day Holiday, Hours to be worked in four (4) - ten (10) hours
shifts,
16.03
Parks & Recreation Department
Employees shall work forty (40) hours per week consisting of varied shifts,
In the Oro-Medonte Community Arena, if an employee is late or phones in sick, the
operator on duty shall ensure that he has contacted his supervisor to advise him of the
situation and will remain at work, up to a maximum of four hours and shall be paid for
actual hours worked at time and one half his regular rate of pay.
16.04
Office. Clerical and Technical
The normal hours of work shall be thirty-five (35) hours per week, Monday to Friday, 8:30 a,m,
to 4:30 p,m,
16.05
This Article does not constitute a guarantee of hours per day or days per week,
ARTICLE 17 - OVERTIME
17.01 In this Agreement, "overtime" is defined as hours of work performed in a week in
excess of the normal weekly hours of work described in Article 16,
17.02 When the Corporation determines that overtime is required, an employee required
to work overtime, and who works, may elect to either be paid at a premium rate for all overtime
hours worked, or to receive time off in lieu of overtime worked,
17.03 When an employee is required to work overtime, and works the overtime, and he
elects to be paid for said hours of overtime worked, any hours in excess of 37 hours for inside
employees and 42 hours per week for outside employees shall be considered overtime and he
shall be paid at the rate of one and one-half (1-1/2) times the regular rate of pay,
17.04 When an employee is required to work overtime, and prefers to receive time in
lieu of receiving overtime pay, any hours in excess of 37 hours for inside employees and 42
hours per week for outside employees shall be considered overtime and the time in lieu banked
for the excess hours as indicated shall be at the rate of one and one-half (1-1/2) times the hours
worked, he shall communicate his election to the Department Head prior to working overtime,
The employee and the Department Head shall mutually agree on the time and date of such time
off,
12 of30
An employee may choose to receive time off in lieu of overtime pay at the appropriate rate at a
time mutually agreed upon between the employee and the supervisor. Outside employees shall
indicate their choice at the time of submitting their crew card, Inside employees shall indicate
their choice on the overtime authorization form,
There shall be permitted a maximum accumulation of five (5) days, a total of forty (40) hours for
outside bargaining unit members, and five (5) days a total of thirty-five (35) hours for inside
bargaining unit members in any calendar year. Any banked overtime not scheduled to be taken
off by year's end prior to November 30, will automatically be paid out to the employee at his
applicable rate as of December 31. The payment will be received with the employee's final
paycheque of the year. Overtime worked in December cannot be banked,
17.05 An employee who is called into work outside his regular hours shall be paid for a
minimum of four (4) hours at time and one-half his regular rate of pay, A Call Out is defined
as: An Emergency call out where an employee is required to make an extra trip to and
from his place of employment.
17.06 Where an employee is required to work four (4) hours of continuous work in
excess of the scheduled shift he shall be supplied with a meal allowance of eight dollars and
fifty cents ($8.50),
ARTICLE 18 - PUBLIC HOLIDAYS
18.01
employees:
The Corporation recognizes the following as paid holidays for permanent
New Year's Day
Good Friday
Easter Monday
Victoria Day
Canada Day
Civic Holiday
Labour Day
Thanksgiving Day
Remembrance Day
Y2 Day before Christmas Day
Christmas Day
Boxing Day
Y2 Day before New Year's Day
and any other day that is subsequently proclaimed a public holiday by the Federal or Provincial
Government.
18.02
Substitute Dav for Observance of Holiday
When any of the holidays specified in Article 18,01 falls on a Saturday or Sunday, the next
regular day of work shall be deemed to be the holiday,
18.03
Eligibility for Paid Holiday
] 3 of 30
An employee shall not be eligible for holiday pay unless he works his last regularly scheduled
shift before the holiday, and his first regularly scheduled shift after the holiday, This provision
shall not apply, however, if the employee is absent from work with permission on either or both
of the above days, Similarly, this provision shall not apply if an employee fails to report to work
due to illness which is subsequently verified to the satisfaction of the Corporation,
18.04 When any of the above noted paid holidays falls on an employee's scheduled day
off, the employee shall receive another day's pay at his standard basic rate, or if in the judgment
of the Corporation it will not adversely affect operations, the employee shall be given an
additional day off in lieu thereof with pay at a time mutually agreed upon by the employee and
the Corporation,
13
18.05 Where an employee works on any of the days listed in Article 18,01, he shall be
paid at the rate of time and one-half (1-1/2) the employee's regular rate of pay, plus the
employee's regular pay for the day,
ARTICLE 19 - V ACA TlONS
19.01
Length of Vacation
All employees with less than one (1) year of continuous service from the last date of hire with the
Corporation shall be entitled to receive vacation with pay in accordance with the Emplovment
Standards Act,
19.02 All employees with one or more years of continuous service from last date of hire
with the Corporation shall be eligible for vacation with pay, as follows:
1 Year
3 Years
8 Years
13 Years
2 Weeks
3 Weeks
4 Weeks
5 Weeks
19.03 An employee's vacation entitlement shall be reduced on a pro rata basis if the
employee's annual attendance record discloses absences due to sickness of twenty (20) working
days or more.
19.04
Compensation for Holidays Falling Within Vacation Schedule
If a paid holiday falls or is observed during an employee's vacation period, he shall be allowed an
additional vacation day with pay at a time mutually agreed to, If the Corporation and the
employee cannot come to a mutual agreement, the holiday shall be taken within one (1) month of
the employee's return to work from vacation,
19.05 An employee severing his employment at any time in the vacation year prior to
using accrued vacation, shall be entitled to a proportionate payment of wages in lieu of such
vacation,
19.06
Unbroken Vacation Period
14of30
The Corporation shall endeavour, when so requested, to schedule employees to receive an
unbroken period of vacation, No such period may exceed three (3) consecutive weeks in
duration,
19.07 In the event of the death of an employee, his executor or administrator shall be
entitled to receive such vacation pay as may stand to the employee's credit, subject to filing an
executed Succession Duty Release in appropriate form with the Chief Administrative Officer.
14
19.08 The Corporation may, in its discretion, permit an employee to carry over a
maximum of five (5) days vacation from one year to the next. Such discretion shall not be
exercised in bad faith,
ARTICLE 20 - SICK LEAVE
20.01 Sick leave with pay shall be provided to protect permanent, full-time employees
against loss of income resulting from absences from work due to genuine illness, Temporary
employees, and employees serving a probationary period are not entitled to sick leave with pay,
20.02 Eligible employees shall be granted six (6) sick days per year at January 1st of
each year with no carryover from year to year. In addition to the foregoing, employees hired
prior to ratification shall maintain any unused sick leave credits held as of the date of ratification
for future use, In any event, however, any accumulation of sick leave credits shall be to a
maximum of six (6) days,
20.03 Employees absent due to a sickness occurrence shall expend not more than three
(3) sick leave credits and shall be entitled to no more than three (3) days sick pay,
20.04 In all cases of absence of three (3) days or more, or upon returning to work from
the absence of three (3) days or more, the employee shall require his physician to prepare a
medical certificate, and shall deliver same to the Chief Administrative Officer. Said medical
certificate shall indicate; the date(s) the employee was seen by his physician; dates the employee
has been unable to work due to illness; and prognosis for a return to regular duties, The
Corporation reserves the right to request such a certificate before the three (3) days if the
Corporation feels that the employee's absence is not justified. This request shall not be
exercised in bad faith. If there are any billing fees associated with obtaining the certificate, the
Corporation shall pay 100 % of the billed fees,
ARTICLE 21 - ATTENDANCE
21.01
The Corporation is entitled to regular attendance on the part of its employees,
21.02 If an employee is unable to attend at work as scheduled, he is required to notify
the Immediate Supervisor or designate, failing that the Chief Administrative Officer or
designate not later than the employee's scheduled starting time, providing details of the reasons
for his absence from work and of the expected duration of the absence, The employee may
subsequently offer evidence of extenuating circumstances that explains the failure to provide
notice as above,
15 af30
ARTICLE 22-LEAVES
22.01
Bereavement Leave
(a) An employee shall be entitled to five (5) days leave of absence with pay to attend the
funeral of a member of his immediate family,
(b) "Immediate family" for purpose of Article 22,0I(a) means the employee's parents,
stepparents, spouse, same-sex partner, child, step-children, brother, sister, mother-in-law,
father-in-law, brother-in-law, sister-in-law, grandparent, grandchild, niece or nephew,
(c) A paid leave of absence of up to one (1) day may be granted an employee for the purpose
of attending the funeral of someone other than a member of the employee's immediate family,
(d) The Corporation may, in its sole discretion, grant an employee additional days off for the
pqrpose of attending a funeral outside the Province of Ontario,
(e) The Corporation is entitled to demand proof of death and/or relationship, and the
employee shall provide same,
22.02
Jury Service or Court Witness Leave
(a) The Corporation shall grant an employee a leave of absence to serve as a juror, or
to attend at criminal court as a Crown witness pursuant to a subpoena, or as a witness for the
Corporation in any legal proceeding, The Corporation shall pay such an employee his regular
wage in respect of such leave, Any payment he receives in respect of jury service, or as a witness
for the Crown or the Corporation, shall be forwarded to the Township immediately upon receipt
thereof, The employee will present proof of service, or attendance as the case may be, and the
amount of any payment received,
(b) The employee is required to notify the Corporation as soon as possible of his selection for
jury service, or in the event he has been subpoenaed by the Crown to attend as its witness in
criminal court,
(c) The employee is required to report to work at all times and on dates when not actually
required in Court,
22.03
Pre2nanCY, Parental Leave and Familv Leave
The Township will abide by the requirement as set out in legislative requirements,
22.04
Union Leave
Upon written application to the Chief Administrative Officer submitted at least twenty-one (21)
days in advance, an employee may be granted an unpaid leave of absence equal to an aggregate
of fifteen (15) working days per calendar year for the bargaining unit (combined inside and
outside units) for the purpose of representing the Union at conventions, conferences, seminars or
workshops, Upon mutual consent of the Union and the Corporation, additional unpaid days of
leave may be granted, The employees' wages and benefits shall not be interrupted, However,
the Union shall reimburse the Corporation for all wages concerned,
16of30
ARTICLE 23 - WAGES AND ALLOWANCES
23.01
Wage/Salarv Administration
(a) The Corporation shall pay permanent employees the wages/salary as described in the
attached wage schedules, Wages shall be paid bi-weekly,
(b) Upon appointment to a bargaining unit position that represents a promotion, an
employee's wage shall be set at that step in the range for the new position that represents the
wage that is closest, and not less than the employee's current wage,
23.02
Automobile Allowance
The Corporation will pay an employee who is required by the Corporation to use his personal
automobile for Corporation business, an automobile allowance in accordance with the rate
established from time to time by the Corporation,
23.03
Clothing and Boot Allowance
Outside employees in the Public Works, and Parks and Recreation Departments and
Building/By-Iaw Inspectors shall be provided with a cheque in January of each year in the
amount of two hundred and fifty dollars ($250,00) for the purchase of clothing that the
Corporation specifically requires to be worn,
The Corporation agrees to provide rain gear, gloves, insulated safety rubber boots and
extra liners, hard hats, and high visibility orange safety wear consisting of jacket,
coveralls/overalls, vests, to the employees, who in the Corporation's opinion require such
items on a need be basis. Worn out clothing must be turned back in to receive new at the
discretion of the Supervisor.
23.04 Where an employee, at the request of the Corporation, performs a higher rated job
for a period exceeding ten (0) working days, the employee shall receive the rate which is
immediately above the current rate of the employee for all hours worked in that higher rated job,
23.05 When an employee, at the request of the Corporation, is temporarily assigned to a
position paying a lower rate, his rate shall not be reduced,
23.06 The Corporation shall endeavour to provide an employee with any pay cheques
that would ordinarily be received during the employee's scheduled vacation, provided the
employee makes a written request for same to the Chief Administrative Officer at least twenty-
one (21) days in advance of the commencement of the scheduled vacation,
ARTICLE 24 . BENEFITS
24.01 The Corporation shall, during the term of the current Collective Agreement, pay
one hundred percent 000%) of the billed premium for the provision of the following benefits for
eligible, permanent full-time employees:
(a) life insurance of triple annual salary to a maximum of $300,000; dependent coverage for
spouse to $10,000 and each child for $2,500;
17 of 30
(b) accidental death and dismemberment, where the level of benefit is dependent upon type
of loss, but in no case exceeding two times (2x) the employee's annual salary, or $100,000,
whichever is less;
(c) long-term disability of seventy-five percent (75%) of monthly earnings to a maximum of
$3,500 per month;
(d) weekly indemnity of seventy-five percent (75%) of weekly earnings to a maximum of
$1,000 per week;
(e) hospital medical insurance as provision of Vision Care is now included in a new Policy
regarding Self-Insurance of Vision Care Attached, The employer agrees to review this program
on a annual basis;
(f) removal of the ten dollar ($ I 0) single and twenty dollar ($20) family deduction from
Extended Health Care Benefits;
(g) dental expense insurance at O,D,A, suggested fee schedule minus two (2) years;
(h) a card is provided for pay direct system for prescriptions and dental care,
Basic Services:
Maior Services:
100% of eligible charges; no maximum
50% of eligible charges; $ I ,500 maximum per calendar
year.
50% of eligible charges; lifetime maximum of $1,500,
Orthodontic:
24.02
Pension:
All permanent and probationary employees shall be enroled in the Ontario Municipal Employees
Retirement System Plan COMERS"), However, this Article does not apply to those cunent
employees who elccted not to enrol in OMERS prior to April 20, 1994,
24.03
Emplovee Assistance Program:
All eligible, permanent employees and covered family members shall be enrolled in an Employee
Assistance Program, The Corporation shall, during the term of the cunent Collective
Agreement, pay one hundred percent (100%) of the billed premiums.
ARTICLE 25 - HEALTH AND SAFETY COMMITTEE
25.01 The Corporation and the Union acknowledge their shared statutory obligation of
maintaining a safe and healthy workplace environment. To that end, a Joint Health and Safety
Committee shall be established,
25.02 Where it is deemed appropriate by the Health and Safety Committee that an
employee receive preventative vaccination as a result of the working environment, any costs shall
be borne by the employer.
18of30
ARTICLE 26 - BULLETlN BOARD
26.01 The Corporation shall provide the Union with bulletin board space in the arena,
the works garages and a specific area in the administration office designated by the Corporation
for the purpose of posting Union notices regarding meetings and other lawful activities of trade
Unions, All such notices must be approved by the Chief Administrative Officer or his/her
designate prior to posting,
ARTlCLE 27 - ALTERATlON OR AMENDMENT
27.01
Any alteration or amendment of this Agreement shall be in writing, and shall be
executed by both the Corporation and the Union,
ARTICLE 28 - JOB SECURITY
28.01 For the term of the first collective agreement, no member of the bargaining unit
with five (5) or more years of seniority with the Corporation shall be laid off as a result of the
contracting out of work normally performed by members of the bargaining unit.
ARTlCLE 29 - TERM OF AGREEMENT
29.01
This Agreement is effective March 13,2005 to January 11,2008,
29.02 In the event that either party to this Agreement provides written notice of its desire
to renew this Agreement, negotiations shall commence within fifteen (15) days of the notice, or
at a time mutually agreed upon by the parties if such written notice is given within ninety (90)
days of the expiry of the agreement.
190f30
DATED at the Township ofOro-Medonte this
day of
,2005,
THE CORPORA nON OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
MAYOR
CLERK
CANADIAN UNION OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES
AND ITS LOCAL 2380
National Representative
20 of 30
WAGE/SALARY SCHEDULE
BARGAINING UNIT EMPLOYEES
effective January 1, 2005
22.88 24.03 25.18 26.33 27.49
22.06 23.17 24.29 25.40 26.52
21.23 22.30 23.37 24.44 25.51
17.81 18.74 19.67 20.60 21.53
17.76 18.69 19.62 20.54 21.47
17.49 18.41 19.34 20.26 21.18
15.73 16.61 17 .48 18.35 19.22
15.85 16.72 17.59 18.45 19.32
15.64 16.50 17.37 18.23 19.10
15.49 16.34 17.20 18.06 18.91
15.11 15.93 16.76 17.58 18.41
14.75 15.56 16.37 17.18 18.00
14.50 15.30 16.10 16.89 17.69
14.62 15.41 16.21 17.00 17.80
14.37 15.15 15.93 16.71 17.49
12.38
12.40
12.23
13.72
13.72
13.56
14.39
14.39
14.22
15.07
15.05
14.88
13.05
13.06
12.90
2] of 30
WAGE/SALARY SCHEDULE
BARGAINING UNIT EMPLOYEES
effective January 8, 2006
23.57 24.75 25.94 27.12 28.31
22.72 23.87 25.01 26.16 27.31
21.86 22.97 24.07 25.17 26.28
18.35 19.31 20.26 21.22 22.18
18.29 19.25 20.20 21.16 22.11
18.02 18.97 19.91 20.86 21.81
16.21 17.10 18.00 18.90 19.79
16.32 17.22 18.11 19.01 19.90
16.10 16.99 17.89 18.78 19.67
15.95 16.83 17.72 18.60 19.48
15.56 16.41 17.26 18.11 18.96
15.19 16.03 16.86 17.70 18.54
14.94 15.76 16.58 17 .40 18.22
15.05 15.87 16.69 17.51 18.33
14.80 15.60 16.41 17.21 18.01
12.75
12.77
12.60
14.13
14.13
13.96
14.83
14.82
14.65
15.52
15.50
15.33
13.44
13.45
13.28
22 of 30
WAGE/SALARY SCHEDULE
BARGAINING UNIT EMPLOYEES
effective January 7, 2007
24.27 25.49 26.71 27.94 29.16
23.40 24.58 25.76 26.95 28.13
22.52 23.65 24.79 25.93 27.06
18.90 19.88 20.87 21.86 22.84
18.84 19.82 20.81 21.79 22.77
18.56 19.53 20.51 21.49 22.46
16.69 17.61 18.54 19.46 20.39
16.81 17.73 18.65 19.57 20.50
16.58 17.50 18.42 19.34 20.26
16.43 17.34 18.24 19.15 20.06
16.03 16.90 17.78 18.65 19.52
15.64 16.50 17.37 18.23 19.09
15.38 16.23 17.07 17.92 18.77
15.50 16.35 17.19 18.03 18.88
15.24 16.07 16.90 17.72 18.55
13.13
13.15
12.98
14.56
14.56
14.38
15.27
15.26
15.08
15.98
15.96
15.79
13.84
13.85
13.68
23 of 30
NOTES APPLlCABLE TO WAGE/SALARY SCHEDULE
It is mutually agreed and understood between the parties that, the criteria required to
progress along the wage grid has been developed and the following notes apply to the
application of the wage/salary schedule:
1. New employees shall be placed by the Corporation,
2, There will be no automatic progression,
3, Progression shall be based on merit and shall be at the discretion of the Employer.
4. The Corporation shall ensure all employees recognized under this Collective
Agreement will receive the applicable negotiated wage/salary increases.
24 of 30
LETTER OF UNDERSTANDING
Between:
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
- and-
THE CANADIAN UNION OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES
Should Council initiate a change to the level of service, in accordance with Article
27 the Union will be contacted,
DATED at the Township of Oro-Medonte this
day of
,2005,
MAYOR
CLERK
CANADIAN UNION OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES
AND ITS LOCAL 2380
National Representative
25 ono
LETTER OF UNDERSTANDING
Between:
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
- and-
THE CANADIAN UNION OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES
The Corporation will under take to complete a full salary review, completed before
the expiry of the first year of the collective agreement (December 31, 2005).
DATED at the Township of Oro-Medonte this
day of
,2005,
MAYOR
CLERK
CANADIAN UNION OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES
AND ITS LOCAL 2380
National Representative
26 of 30
LETTER OF UNDERSTANDING
Between:
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
- and-
THE CANADIAN UNION OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES
Union and Employer will jointly prepare a survey with respect to the EAP
program. Any savings realized through the EAP shall be directed towards the
vision care package for the full-time employees only,
DATED at the Township of Oro- Medonte this
day of
,2005,
MAYOR
CLERK
CANADIAN UNION OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES
AND ITS LOCAL 2380
National Representative
27 of 30
LETTER OF UNDERSTANDING
Between:
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
- and-
THE CANADIAN UNION OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES
One year trial (2006) - Vacation
1. The Corporation shall attempt to provide vacations during the periods
preferred by employees; however, in scheduling vacations, the Corporation shall
ensure that operational requirements are met and that sufficient personnel are
available to provide the required level of service, If two or more employees
simultaneously request the same vacation time, and a conflict arises, seniority shall
govern,
2, Applications for scheduling vacation shall be made in writing, by January
15 to January 31 for the current year for an employee's full vacation entitlement,
Management will process and approve applications as noted above,
3, An application for scheduling vacation made after January 15 to January 31
shall be submitted in writing, as far in advance of the requested time as possible,
Management will process and approve such applications, as noted above, on a
first-come, first-served basis, Once such an application for scheduling vacation
has been approved, such scheduling cannot be changed except by the approval of
their immediate supervisor and the Chief Administrative Officer.
DATED at the Township of Oro-Medonte this
day of
,2005,
MAYOR
CLERK
CANADIAN UNION OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES
AND ITS LOCAL 2380
National Representative
28 of 30
Oro-Medonte Township
Policy Regarding Self-Insurance of Vision Care
Section Subject Page
1 of 1
ADMINISTRATION SELF-INSURANCE OF Day Month Year
VISION CARE 15 06 2005
Policy
The Township of Oro-Medonte will reimburse each employee and each of their dependants
whom are enrolled in the extended health benefit plan up to $100,00 every 12 months for:
. Eyeglasses (lenses and/or frames) including prescription sunglasses;
. Contact lenses;
. Repairs to such lenses and/or frames
Benefits not used in the calendar year can be banked up to a maximum of $200,00,
The henefit maximum of $200.00 may be shared among all members of a family. I.e. 4
family members with a maximum of $200.00 each for a total of $800.00 can be split by 2
family members for $400.00 each.
Eye Examinations will be paid upon submission of receipts as part of the $100.00 every 12
month benefit.
The Township of Oro-Medonte will not pay benefits for:
. Any expenses covered by the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board or any
government plan,
The definition of Employee or dependants will be used as outlined in the Township's extended
health benefits package,
Procedure
1) All prescription VISIOn care expenses incurred on or after January 1, 2002 must be
submitted to the Human Resources Officer in order to be considered for payment.
2) Complete the Vision Care Expense form, Employee signature required,
3) Original receipts must be presented for payment. In the instance where reimbursement is
received through a spouse's employee benefit plan, a copy of the receipt may be
submitted with the original payment statement from the spouse's benefit carrier.
4) If the claim is for a dependant as outlined in the Township master benefit plan, their name
and date of birth must be indicated,
5) Reimbursement will be made within three (3) weeks of approval of the claim,
29 of 30
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
VISION CARE REIMBURSEMENT EXPENSE FORM
DATE:
EMPLOYEE NAME:
EMPLOYEE #:
DEPENDANT NAME:
DEPENDANT BIRTH DATE:
CLAIM AMOUNT:
CO-ORDINATION OF BENEFITS:
YES
NO
SHARING OF BENEFIT MAXIMUMS:
DEPENDENT NAME & AMOUNT:
DEPENDENT NAME & AMOUNT:
EMPLOYEE SIGNATURE:
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
DATE OF LAST CLAIM:
AMOUNT OF LAST CLAIM:
APPROVAL:
YES
NO
APPROVED AMOUNT:
APPROVED BY:
DATE SUBMITTED TO PAY ABLES:
30 of 30
- \
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
REPORT
Dept. Report No. To: COMMITTEE OF THE Prepared By:
WHOLE
PW2005-08 Jerry Ball
Subject: Department:
Council
Line 15 North - Community Public Works
C.ofW. Safety Zone Date:
June 15, 2005
Motion # R.M. File #:
T08.12728
Date: RolI#:
II BACKGROUND:
~
Report #PW2005-06 was presented to Council at the Regular Committee of the Whole meeting held
on May 25, 2005 with regards to speed control and traffic concerns on Line 15 North. This Report
recommended that a Community Safety Zone not be created and speed bumps not be installed on
Line 15 North between Hwy. #12 and Bass Lake Sideroad. Council deferred Report #PW2005-06
(attached) requesting further information on the possibility of creating a Community Safety Zone on
Line 15 North, along with the installation of temporary speed bumps. All municipalities within Simcoe
County were requested to provide information with respect to guidelines and criteria for creating
Community Safety Zones.
The Public Works Department completed a new traffic count for Line 15 North, which resulted in an
AADT of 2,000 vehicles per day.
II ANALYSIS:
II
Results were received from a number of local area municipalities reporting that most municipalities
(which include Oro-Medonte) have created a Community Safety Zone on roadways near schools, as
per the policy established by the Ministry of the Solicitor General and Correctional Services (1998).
An article in the Ontario Traffic Conference publication states that larger centers have established
thirteen (13) Community Safety Zones within their respective municipalities under the new Provincial
legislation, as part of a pilot program to determine the effectiveness of the new traffic control zones.
These studies concluded that the Community Safety Zone programs have generally not been
effective in modifying driver behavior as there was a low percentage of speed reduction and in most
cases, drivers ignored the Safety Zones; this provided an actual increase in traffic speed. It also
stated in this publication that police enforcement has more of a mitigating effect on driver behavior
than the Community Safety Zone itself. This information is available in the Road Superintendent's
office. As per the legislative authority for Community Safety Zones set out in Section 214.1 of the
Highway Traffic Act, municipalities have the authority to state the hours, days of the week, and
months of the year during which the zone should be active (i.e. during which increased fines will be
applied). When addressing a request to establish a Community Safety Zone in an area of the
Township, it is recommended that the following guidelines apply:
. Knowledge of collisions and/or personal injuries;
. Presence of pedestrian traffic;
. Proximity to schools and/or related uses, which expose vulnerable groups to traffic-related
hazards;
. Persistent concerns related to speeding and other traffic offences.
In considering this information, it is recommended that a Community Safety Zone be created on Line
15 North from Hwy. #12 to Bass Lake Sideroad, commencing May 1 st and continuing to October 1 st
of each year, 24 hours a day, seven days a week. It is recommended that the O.P.P. be requested
to provide monthly statistics on enforcement.
It is also recommended that speed bumps not be installed on Line 15 North due to the fact that
temporary speed bumps are not recommended as a traffic calming measure and in turn, increases
liability, per previous reports.
Further, it is recommended that an oversized "No Truck Route" sign be installed at both entrances to
Line 15 North between Hwy. #12 and Bass Lake Sideroad.
II RECOMMENDATION(S):
~
1. THAT Report No. PW2005-08 be received and adopted.
2. THAT Council receives Report #PW2005-06.
3. THAT a Community Safety Zone be created on Line 15 North from Hwy. #12 to Bass Lake
Sideroad to be in force from May 1 st to October 1 st of each year, 24 hours a day, seven days a
week.
4. THAT speed bumps not be installed on Line 15 North between Hwy. #12 and Bass Lake
Sideroad.
5. THAT the Public Works Department installs oversized "No Truck Route" signs at both entrances
to Line 15 North between Hwy. #12 and Bass Lake Sideroad.
6. THAT the O.P.P. be requested to provide monthly statistical reports on enforcement for Line 15
North.
- 2 -
7. THAT Council endorses the following as guidelines when considering a request to establish a
Community Safety Zone:
. Knowledge of collisions and/or personal injuries;
. Presence of pedestrian traffic;
. Proximity to schools and/or related uses, which expose vulnerable groups to traffic-related
hazards;
. Persistent concerns related to speeding and other traffic offences.
8. AND THAT the Public Works Superintendent advises the residents of Line 15 North of Council's
decision.
Respectfully submitted,
Jerry Ball
Public Works Superintendent
;r:;, <1\'\ Y\ ()J,}..J /
l-JV b !1)~
1'oyl
(j\~
- 3 -
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
REPORT
Dept. Report No. To: COMMITTEE OF THE Prepared By:
WHOLE
PW2005-06 Jerry Ball
Subject: Department:
Council
Speed Control and Traffic Public Works
C.ofW. Concerns - Line 15 North Date:
May 18, 2005
Motion R.M. File #:
#
T08-12728
Date: Roll #:
II BACKGROUND:
II
A deputation from the residents of Line 15 North was presented to Council in
February, 2005 requesting Council's consideration of the installation of speed bumps
along Line 15 North, between Highway #12 and the Bass Lake Sideroad. In addition
to the speed bumps, the local residents also requested that this section of road be
designated Community Safety Zone.
Line 15 North has become a busy commuter route, carrying traffic from Highway #12
West and surrounding areas, to local businesses in the southwesterly portion of the
City of Orillia. The traffic count on this section of roadway is 150 to 200 vehicles, per
hour, during morning and evening rush hour.
Heavy trucks are prohibited under by-law 2004-068 on Line 15 North between
Highway #12 and Bass lake Side Road. Local residents have reported that trucks
continue to travel within the restricted area to Highway #12 or into the Orillia City limits.
Section 1 a) of the by-law provides the definition of "heavy truck" means a truck having
an unloaded weight of at least 4.6 metric tonnes (Regulation 601, R.R.O. 1990,
Highway Traffic Act).
~
II ANALYSIS:
Barrie O.P.P. have been active in providing enforcement for Line 15 North and in
recent discussions with Detachment Commander Ed Whinnery, he has advised that an
officer attends Line 15 North every second day for 1 to 1 Y, hours to assist in the 40
km/h speed enforcement. During these patrols, there have been three to four charges
laid each time, including truck violations and warnings. Detachment Commander
Whinnery has developed a "Traffic Complaint Initiative" Form for all speed complaints
which will assist in tracking all complaints and charges laid within the municipality.
Staff have also been monitoring the area for truck traffic and in those instances report
no truck violations.
Speed bumps have been requested from other residents in different areas of the
community and Council has historically denied the request on the basis of liability and
that speed bumps have been proven to be dangerous especially during the winter
maintenance period.
Further discussion occurred with the staff from the City of Orillia and a local sign
company. The City utilized two speed bumps within a street block as a traffic calming
device near a high school zone. According to City staff, the results were not favourable
and problems worsened as drivers would stop on top of the bump and accelerate
rapidly, causing dislocation of the bumps and creating higher than normal noise levels.
Vehicles would also ease over the bump and then drive erratically at a high speed
down the street; resulting in City staff removing the bumps and recommending that this
type of traffic-calming measure should only be used within parking lots.
It is recommended that speed bumps not be placed along Line 15 North, between
Highway #12 and the Bass Lake Sideroad.
Residents also requested consideration be given to changing Line 15 North, between
Highway #12 and Bass Lake Sideroad, to a Community Safety Zone. Council has in
the past deliberated the issue of declaring an area as a Community Safety Zone.
The Detachment Commander at that time, Detachment Commander Hassberger,
advised the Township that a Community safety Zone demands a higher standard of
enforcement and is usually in the vicinity of a school.
- 2 -
~\
, r,
\ VI
Currently, the municipality has three Community Safety Zones on municipal roads
located within school zones. Line 15 North does not meet the Township criteria or
approach utilized by other municipalities. Commander Whinnery recommends that
Line 15 North not be dedicated has a Community Safety Zone as patrol could not be
increased to enforce the zone at this time. Commander Whinnery also feels that his
patrol personnel are making some positive changes to speeders on Line 15 North, with
increased patrol of the area and charges being laid.
Therefore, it is recommended to Council that no Community Safety Zone be created
on Line 15 North from Highway #12 to Bass Lake Sideroad.
II RECOMMENDATION(S):
11
1. THAT Report No. PW2005-06 be received and adopted.
2. THAT no Community Safety Zone be created on Line 15 North between Highway
#12 and Bass Lake Sideroad.
3. THAT no speed bumps be installed on Line 15 North between Highway #12 and
Bass Lake Sideroad.
4. AND THAT the Public Works Superintendent advise the residents of Line 15 North
of Council's decision.
Respectfully submitted,
Jerry Ball
Public Works Superintendent
r\ . ( n j A c.,cA C)
/lJD f\-\.../'JV '--- .
(\j~ r.. ~r;) o~~
I. V \ ("VV\ ~ ~-:;r--
\.~, f/'\
( \
o
-3-
\b~\
Dept. Report No. To: COMMITTEE OF THE Prepared By:
WHOLE
PW2005-09 Jerry Ball
Subject: Department:
Council
Salt Management Plan Public Works
C.ofW. Date:
June 16, 2005
Motion # R.M. File #:
T06-22979
Date: RolI#:
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
REPORT
II BACKGROUND:
II
R. J. Burnside and Associates Ltd. from Collingwood were contracted to assist the Public Works
Department in preparing a Salt Management Plan, which must be filed with Environment Canada by
June 30, 2005. Included with the Salt Management Plan will be the annual Monitoring and
Measuring Progress Status Form reporting on the activities for the 2004/2005 winter season.
II ANALYSIS:
II
The draft Salt Management Plan was circulated to Council, C.A.O., Clerk and Treasurer for
comments on May 10, 2005. Minor changes were made to the report and the Status Form has been
completed. It is therefore recommended that Council give favourable consideration to the Salt
Management Plan dated March, 2005.
II RECOMMENDATION(S):
II
1. THAT Report No. PW2005-09 be received and adopted.
2. AND THAT Council approves the Salt Management Plan dated March, 2005.
Re;?pectfully submitted,
/!~h
I Jerry Ball
'!!J~Public Works Superintendent
r
I
I
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
SALT MANAGEMENT PLAN
Original Approved by Council: mm/dd/2005
Revision 1:
Revision 2:
R.J.Burnside & Associates Limited
MG 04 7917
March 2005
Township of Oro.Medonte
Salt Management Plan
March 2005
Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction .........................................................................................................................1
1.1 Overview ~.....................~...~......................~............~.~.................~..................................~. 1
1.2 Purpose of the Plan ..~~.......................................................~..~..~........................~..............2
1.3 Responsibilities..................................~.......... ~....~.............~.. ..... .......................~.. ..............3
2.0 Current Practices........................................................................ .........................................3
3.0 Roadway Maintenance Standards: Winter ..........................................................................5
3.1 Objectives............... ...............~.~.............~.. ................................ ~....~..... ~~........................ 6
3.2 Level of Service..................~............. ~.....~.........~....~............~.... ~~.......................~........... 6
4.0 Salt Management Plan Goals............................................................................................... 7
4.1 Level ot Service (LOS)....~.......................~...........~..................................................~~.......~ 7
4.2 Fleet Allocation/Optimization............~.~..~.............................. ~~~. ...............................~....... 8
4.3 Spreader Controls..............~. ~..~.................~...............~.................~.......~..~...................... 8
4.4 Pre-Wetting Equipment...........................................~...~................. ~.......................... ~....... ~ 8
4.5 Spreader Calibration....~. ~~....~................~..............~~.....................~..................~....~...~... 8
4.6 Equipment Washing..........................................~........................................~..~..................... 8
4.7 Material Ordering and Delivery.....................~................................~.~~~.~............................8
4.8 Blended Sand Storage/Handling..................................................~...... ~~.............................. 8
4.9 Housekeeping Practices.............~....~...................................................................~.............. 8
4.10 Weather Forecasting.....................~...................................~..............~....~............................ 9
4.11 Snow and Ice Event Response~..~...........~..~...........~..~~~..............~..~~.........................~~9
4.12 Training............ ~..... .................~................... ~~...................~..........................~................... 9
4.13 Technology Transfer Review............~...........~~..............~..~...............~................................ 9
4.14 Communications ~~.........................~...........................~...~............................~..................... 9
4.15 Environmentally Sensitive Areas ........~.~................................................................~..~.~~....9
4.16 Material Usage Record Keeping........~...............~...................~.......................~....~..............9
5.0 Concluding Comments ......................................................................................................10
R.J.8urnside & Associates Limited
MG 04 7917
Township of Oro.Medonte
Salt Management Pian
April 2005
1.0 Introduction
1.1 Overview
The Township of Oro-Medonte Public Works Department is responsible for the winter
maintenance of approximately 614 kilometres of roads. The road system, which consists
of \38 km of High Class Bituminous, 200 km of Low Class Bituminous and 276 km of
Gravel Surface, reflects the level of traffic on the roads within the constraints of a budget.
Each road type has unique characteristics and provides for the safe, efficient and
affordable means of transportation for the road users.
The Township ofOro-Medonte is primarily a rural municipality with 19000 people who
rely on the roadway network throughout the year for transport to the workplace, to
recreation and leisure facilities, of goods and services, and for emergency and security
services. Snow and ice conditions on the road system have a dramatic impact on public
safety, roadway capacity, travel time and economic costs. User safety remains the most
important priority within this Salt Management Plan.
Although there is ongoing research into the use of alternatives for road salt in winter
maintenance operations, salt continues to be a cost-effective de-icer. To provide safe
driving conditions during the winter, the Township ofOro-Medonte uses road salt to keep
sand from freezing and to act as an agent to melt the snow and ice on the Township roads.
This has been an accepted practice throughout Canada for many decades.
To lessen the adverse affects that salt has on the environment, the Township Salt
Management Plan will strive to minimize the amount of salt used by including best salt
management practices, and using new technologies
Snow that has been removed from roads to specific disposal sites can contain high
concentrations of salt and other ice control chemicals, oil and heavy metals from cars,
dirt and garbage from the roadside. Measures must be in place to contain and minimize
their effects. The Ministry of the Environment provides guidelines on where disposal
sites can be located. An alternative method to snow disposal sites is portable snow
melters. This is a good option if space is limited and the melted snow (water) can be
discharged to storm sewers although the previously mentioned debris can be deposited
further down the line.
Environment Canada has been studying the effects of Salt on plants, birds, animals, fish,
groundwater and lake and stream ecosystems. Freshwater fish are especially intolerant to
salt contamination. High salt concentrations can affect the nutrient absorption,
reproduction, and growth of vegetation.
The Township ofOro-Medonte recognizes cold-water streams and lakes as being
environmentally sensitive areas. Oro-Medonte makes up the eastern portion of the Lake
Simcoe drainage system.
R.J.Burnslde & Associates Limited
MG 04 7917
Township of Oro-Medonte
Salt Management Plan
April 2005
2
Salt also accelerates the corrosion of metal such as steel beams in bridges and steel
bodies on vehicles. In spring, animals that are low in salt from the winter are attracted to
the side of the road where they can lick for salt and become a road hazard, as animals do
not stay on the side of the road.
In 2001, the Environment Canada assessment report was released which recommended
that salt be classified as toxic under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA).
Currently road salts are on the Priority Substance List of the CEP A Environment
Registry. In high enough concentrations salt creates a taste and odour that is unpleasant.
It should be stated though that Salt is not harmful to humans as stated by Health
Canada. Road salts will not be banned but instead, users have been encouraged to
develop a management strategy to reduce use and implement alternatives, especially in
salt sensitive areas.
Municipalities who use more than 500 tonnes of road salt or have sensitive areas are
asked to prepare a salt management plan. The Council of the Township ofOro-Medonte
is committed to developing a salt management plan that will help reduce the use of salt
and the detrimental effects to the environment as well as maintaining the current level of
winter service and ensuring Safety will always be the first priority.
1.2 Purpose of the Plan
The Township of Oro-Medonte has developed a policy and procedural framework to
ensure that the Township continuously improves the management of road salt used in
their winter maintenance operations.
The Salt Management plan will always be evolving because it is based on the current best
management practices. The Township ofOro-Medonte will always strive to ensure a high
level of safety on our sidewalks and roads. As new technologies and ideas develop, the
salt management plan will change to incorporate these ideas. The plan will set out
guidelines for continually improving our methods for keeping the roads safe and reducing
the use of salt. The plan will also provide a benchmark from which the Township can
monitor the progress of the plan.
The Plan is activity based and follows a framework consistent with the principles of
continual improvement. It includes the following elements:
. Periodic Review and Analysis of Industry Practices
. Implementation and Documentation ofthe Plan
. Education and Training of Staff
. Monitoring and Analysis
. Management Review
. Practices and Policy Revision
R.J.Burnside & Associates Limited
MG 04 7917
Township of Oro-Medonte
Salt Management Plan
April 2005
3
1.3 Responsibilities
Effective road salt management is the responsibility of everyone within the Township
connected with winter road maintenance. Township Council and staff (from senior
management to operators) will share the responsibility for developing, implementing and
reviewing the success of the Salt Management Plan. It is through this cooperative effort
that the Township will reduce the environmental effects of its road salt while maintaining
safe roads.
2.0 Current Practices
The Township ofOro-Medonte solely uses a blended salt and sand mix. The blended sand
is used to provide traction for vehicles on slippery ice and packed snow. A ratio of 5%
salt and 95% sand is presently used. The salt prevents the sand from freezing in
stockpiles and also assists with melting ice and packed snow.
Over an average winter season the Township uses approximately 32 000 metric tonnes of
sand and 650 metric tonnes of salt. The County of Simcoe annually purchases an average
of 450 tonnes of blended sand from the Township which is included in the 32000 metric
tones.
The Township has the following four (4) sand storage piles:
. Covered Storage
North Pit (7th Line & Warminster Side Road )
Capacity
4 600 cU.m.
South Pit (7th Line & Old Barrie Road)
4 600 cU.m.
R.J.Burnside & Associates Limited
MG 04 7917
Township of Oro-Medonte
Salt Management Plan
April 2005
4
These two facilities are filled each fall by contracted services using stacking
equipment. During the winter season the Township refills the North Pit (two
times) and the South Pit (three times) by hauling the winter sand with Township
trucks from municipally owned pits and stockpiling by pushing the sand up with
front-end loaders.
. Uncovered Storage
North Patrol Yard (County Road 19)
Capacity
I 000 cU.m.
Former MTO Patrol Yard (15/16 Side Road & Line 13) 2 200 cU.m.
The covered sand storage buildings have been in use since 1998. The storage buildings
consist of a 3.0 m high concrete foundation with the sand being retained against this
concrete foundation. The sand and salt are blended and stockpiled into the building each
October. Front-end loaders are used to load the blended sand onto sanders within the
sand storage building. The Township does not purchase or store straight salt for anti-
icing or de-icing.
The covered storage buildings have an asphalt surface, which drains to the center to
control salt leaching from the building into the surrounding environment.
The yard at each blended sand storage facility is scraped regularly to control migration of
material.
The Township relies on local forecasts and road patrol staff to assist in managing
responses to storms. All patrol vehicles have Environment Canada programmed into the
vehicle radio. Presently the Township does not take advantage ofInternet forecasts by
Environment Canada and World Weather nor has access to RWIS (Road Weather
Information Systems).
At this time the Township's patrol and inspection vehicles are not equipped with onboard
or handheld road temperature probes for air and road temperatures. These probes provide
R.J.Burnside & Associates Limited
MG 04 7917
Township of Oro.Medonte
Salt Management Plan
April 2005
5
-Y'o
an accurate and quick gauge of local weather and road conditions and will be
implemented in the 2006/2007 winter season.
The public is informed through newsletters, the Township's web site (http://www.oro-
medonte.ca), and po stings of the Township's winter maintenance standards. The road
priorities in regard to order and standards are outlined in the Township winter
maintenance level of service, and in Regulation 239. The priorities may change as areas
become more urbanized and as regulations change.
In the spring, street sweepers collect excess sand and debris from the roads. Catch basins
have sand and debris cleaned out on an annual basis.
The Township has nine (9) tandem axle combination plow/sand trucks, two (2) single
axle combination plow/sand trucks and five (5) grader plows. In addition the Township
contracts sanding and plowing operations to two (2) combination plow/sand trucks and
one (I) plow truck. The sand trucks currently have manual spreader controls. The plows
have carbide blades and manual plow tilt functions installed. In addition plow trucks have
12-foot leveling wings for additional road width clearing. The Township ofOro-Medonte
currently does not use onboard pre-wetting.
Time cards and driver sheets are presently used as records of roads travelled and winter
control material used.
Presently there is no program for removal of snow since most Township roads are rural or
semi urban in nature and can have the snow simply pushed to the side.
The Township does not use any pre-wetting agents with their blended sand.
Internal staff is used by the Township of Oro-Medonte to train their workers with respect
to when and how to plow and sand according to weather and road conditions.
The Township has a 2417-response service in place. The Township ofOro-Medonte
presently uses the Winter Patrol Record and Routine Patrol Records in accordance
with Ontario Regulation 239 and as recognized by the Ontario Good Roads Association.
No monitoring programs are in place and the Township has conducted no yard
assessments recently.
Roadway Emergency Response programs exist for all municipal roads. The Township
does not have a maintenance yard response program.
3.0 Roadway Maintenance Standards: Winter
The standards outlined within the Township Salt Management Plan are considered to be a
guideline. Various conditions may temporarily prevent these standards from being met
such as available resources (funds, equipment, manpower) and weather conditions. It is
R.J.Burnside & Associates Limited
MG 04 7917
Township of Oro-Medonte
Salt Management Plan
April 2005
6
expected that traffic will reduce speeds to suit the weather conditions until the road
standards are met.
3.1 Objectives
. The primary objective is to meet or exceed the Minimum Maintenance Standards for
Municipal Highways under Ontario Regulation 239/02 as made under the Municipal
Act
. To reduce the hazards of icy conditions to motorists and pedestrians
. To reduce the economic losses to the community caused by winter weather conditions
. To facilitate the handling of emergencies by fire and police officials
. To maintain safe passable routes within the financial limits of the municipality's
budget
. To reduce the use of road salt through the use of best management practices to protect
the environment
3.2 level of Service
The major activities related to the Township winter maintenance operations are blended
salt/sand storage, blended sand spreading and snow plowing.
For the purposes of road patrolling, snow plowing, sanding, snow and ice control, all the
Township roads have been classified. The Township has five classes ofroad (Class 2, 3,
4, 5 and 6) within the municipal road network, which are based on the posted speed and
traffic volumes.
The winter control Level of Service (LOS) standards are designed to meet the needs of
the Township from the perspective of driver safety and the provision of emergency
service. The LOS standards are driven by both the technical requirements of winter
operations and the need to address the socio-economic concerns of a large rural
municipality.
The Township LOS standards for winter control operations are attached in Appendix' A'.
Listed below is a summary of these standards.
Primary Roads (Class 2 and 3):
. Applies to all roads with an average daily traffic in excess of 1000 V.P.D.
. The maximum allowable average depth of new fallen or general wind blown snow is
allowed to accumulate on the road surface is 5 centimetres (2 inches)
. Plowing operations should be completed (one coverage of the road) in an average
time of approximately six-hour frequency for Class 2 and twelve-hour frequency for
Class 3 from the start of operations.
R.J.Burnside & Associates Limited
MG 04 7917
Township of Oro-Medonle
Salt Management Plan
April 2005
7
o Sanding operations should be completed (one coverage of the road) in an average
time of approximately four-hour frequency for Class 2 and eight-hour frequency for
Class 3 from the start of operations
o Surfaces shall be maintained in a snow packed condition during a storm by the use of
the assigned men and equipment.
o After a storm the road surfaces shall be sanded within six (6) hours from the start of
sanding operations. These roads to be sanded to a centre bare or centre sanded
standard.
o Localized snow drifting may occur over the road surface. Drifts should not be
allowed to accumulate more than 8 cm (3 inches) measured across more than half a
travelled lane in a localized area.
Secondary Roads and Streets
o Applies to all roads with an average daily traffic less than 1000 V.P .D.
o The maximum allowable average depth of new fallen or general wind blown snow is
allowed to accumulate on the road surface is 8 to 10 cm (3 to 4 inches).
o Localized snow drifting may occur over the road surface. Drifts should not be
allowed to accumulate more than 30 cm (12 inches) measured across more than half a
travelled lane in a localized area.
o Plowing and sanding operations should be completed (one coverage of the road) in an
average time of approximately 12-hour frequency from the start of operations.
o Surfaces shall be maintained in a snow packed condition during a storm by the use of
the assigned men and equipment.
o Sanding of hills, curves, intersections, and railway crossings shall generally be the
only treatment of these roads. They will only be sanded continuously during a
freezing rain or sleet storm, or when the roads become extremely slippery.
o Graders should scrape the surface of gravel roads only by means of ice blades to
reduce the need for sand on these roads during freezing rain and sleet storm events
o In the event of severe rutting or potholing (generally in the spring of the year) the
snow pack shall be removed by the use of a grader.
o Plowing and sanding shall occur after the primary roads have been plowed.
4.0 Salt Management Plan Goals
The primary goal of the Township ofOro-Medonte Salt Management Plan will be to
continue to provide safe transportation on all roads while adapting to changing situations
and demands from a growing population. All goals recognize that the Plan is dynamic
and will be implemented as Township resources allow.
Listed below are Salt Management Goals for key operational practices and strategies.
4.1 Level of Service (LOS)
o Annually review the Township LOS with the provincial maintenance standards and
revise as required.
R.J.8urnside & Associates limited
MG 04 7917
Township 01 Oro.Medonte
Salt Management Plan
April 2005
I
"
8
. Train and inform operators, management and the public on the intentions and
expectations of service delivery
. Annually monitor and report on compliance of the LOS policy.
R.J.8urnside & Associates Limited
MG 04 7917
Township of Oro-Medonte
Sail Management Plan
April 2005
\
8
4.2 Fleet Allocation/Optimization
. Review spreader and plow routes as new technologies are implemented or the LOS is
changed.
. Increase staff and equipment levels to meet growth needs.
. Install temperature probes in patrol trucks.
4.3 Spreader Controls
. Investigate the merits of groundspeed regulated electronic controllers with printout or
download capability to track blended sand applications.
. Investigate the merits of GPS tracking and record-keeping capabilities on all winter
maintenance vehicles.
4.4 Pre-Wetting Equipment
. Assess and review the results of liquid calcium as a pre-wetting agent for blended
sand experience by other municipal road authorities.
4.5 Spreader Calibration
. All sanding routes will be benchmarked by determining the quantity of material used.
.
4.6 Equipment Washing
. Investigate options for managing wash water at maintenance facilities.
4.7 Material Ordering and Delivery
. Cover all salt as soon as possible following delivery.
4.8 Blended Sand Storage/Handling
. Budget for and construct indoor storage complete with asphalt loading pad for the
North Patrol Yard.
. Reduce the percentage salt in the sand salt mix to just enough to prevent the mixture
from freezing (2% to 5%) dependent on the moisture content of the sand.
4.9 Housekeeping Practices
. Implement a Good Housekeeping Policy.
. Provide annual training on good housekeeping practices by fall of each year.
4.10 Weather Forecasting
R.J.Burnside & Associates Limited
MG 04 7917
Township of Oro.Medonte
Salt Management Plan
April 2005
9
. Investigate the usefulness ofInternet forecasts by Environment Canada, World
Weather and RWIS (Road Weather Information Systems).
. Provide annual training in the understanding and use of weather information.
4.11 Snow and Ice Event Response
. Develop a consistent event response form including a definition of an "event".
. Each patrol yard will complete the form at the end of each event.
4.12 Training
. Incorporate salt management principles into training program in accordance with
TAC's Salt Management Synthesis of Best Practices for Training.
. Present training to Managers, Supervisors and Operators in the fall each year.
. Provide training to Contracted Plow/Sand Equipment operators in the fall of each
year.
4.13 Technology Transfer Review
. Review the latest technologies as appropriate.
. Participate in conferences and forums geared to the development of Road Salt Best
Management Practices.
4.14 Communications
. Annually inform Council, public and local regulatory agencies about the actions
being taken by the Township to manage road salt use and the winter maintenance
program through a brochure or website.
. Notify Environment Canada of the completion and updates of the Salt management
Plan.
4.15 Environmentally Sensitive Areas
. Work with the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority (LSRCA) and the
Nottawasaga Yalley Conservation Authority (NYCA) to identify vulnerable areas.
4.16 Material Usage Record Keeping
. Annually record blended sand use and reconcile against material stockpiled.
. Provide annual record-keeping training.
RJ.Burnside & Associates Limited
MG 04 7917
Township of Oro-Medonte
Salt Management Plan
April 2005
10
5.0 Concluding Comments
The Township of Oro-Medonte is committed to keeping our roads and sidewalks
maintained up to the service levels outlined in the Roadway Maintenance Standards and
the Minimum Maintenance Standards for Municipal Highways under Ontario Regulation
239/02. While doing so, the Township will remain committed to reducing the
environmental impacts of snow and ice control chemicals such as salt.
The Township will be continuously improving and updating the Salt Management Plan as
new technologies and techniques becomc available and as improved Best Management
Practices become available.
R.J.Burnslde & Associates Limited
MG 04 7917
Township of Oro.Medonte
Salt Management Plan
April 2005
11
References
. Ontario Good Roads Association, www.ogra.org, July 2004
. Salt Management Plan, Town ofInnisfil, August 2004
. Salt Management Plan Summary, Regional Municipality of Halton, July 9th 2003
. Transportation Association of Canada, www.tac-atc.ca. September 2003
. Roadway Service Standard, Township of Oro-Medonte, December ????
. Environment Canada, http://www.ec.gc.ca/. July 2004
. Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority, http://www.lsrca.on.ca/. August 2004
. Canadian Climate and Water Information, Environment Canada, http:
//www.climate.weatheroffice.ec.gc.ca/climate normals/
R.J.Burnside & Associates Limited
MG 04 7917
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
Salt Manal.!ement Plan: Monitorinl.! and Measurinl.! Prol.!ress
Status Form
1. Background Information
Organization
Township ofOro-Medonte
1408 Line 7 South
Box 100
Oro, Ontario LOL 2XO
(705) 487 - 6499
www.oro-medonte.ca
Population 19 000
Salt Management Plan
A Salt Management Plan does exist and was implementcd for the 2004/2005
winter season.
Date of approval of the Salt Management Plan: June 22 2005
Datc oflatest revision of the Salt Management Plan: N/ A
Road Length Serviced
614 kilometres ofroad are serviced by the Township ofOro-Medonte:
. 138 km of High Class Bituminous
. 200 km of Low Class Bituminous
. 276 km of Gravel Surface.
Winter Severity
Rating of severity of winter: Low
Moderate X
High_
Previous winter severities
Number of events requiring salt application during the winter, averaged over all
districts within the jurisdiction: None
Number of events requiring blended sand/salt application during the winter,
averaged over all districts within the jurisdiction: 44
R.J.Burnside & Associates Limited
MG 04 7917
2
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
Salt Mana!!ement Plan: Monitorin!! and Measurin!! Pro!!ress
Status Form
2. Materials Used
Total Quantity of road salts used for winter road maintenance: 809.4 tonnes
Description and quantity of non-chloride materials used in winter road
maintenance. 39,147 tonnes Screened sand
Description and quantity of other materials used in winter road maintenance
N/A
3. Material Storage
Objectives for implementing best management practices related to material
storage, as indicated by our salt management plan:
. Blended Sand and Salt for the North Patrol Yard is stored in a covered
weatherproofed dome.
Current state of implementation for each practice:
Commence budget for future Storage Facility
4. Winter Road Maintenance Equipment and Road Sail Application Practices
Objectives towards implementing best management practices related to road
maintenance equipment and salt application practices:
State of implementation for each practice: Review each sand route for reduction
of sand/salt usage
5. Winter Road Majntenance Training
Existence of a winter road maintenance-training program:
Obiectives for training of personnel: Training to date has been done by
management staff. Will utilize outside training in the 2005 fall.
R.J.Burnside & Associates Limited
MG 04 7917
3
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
Salt Manal!ement Plan: Monitorinl! and Measurinl! Prol!ress
Status Form
State of training personnel:
6. Areas Vulnerable to Road Salts
Existenee of areas vulnerable to road salts:
Description of additional salt management practices undertaken by the
organization in identified vulnerable areas:
Attached map of vulnerable areas throughout the municipality.
H :\2004\MG 04 7917\Salt PJan\04222005oromedontesaltplanfinal.doc
R.J.Burnside & Associates Lirnited
MG 04 7917
Attachment
Township of Oro-Medonte
Official Plan
Appendix 1 depicting Environment Protection, Groundwater Recharge, Oro
Moraine Open and Closed Waste Disposal Sites.
"..,1
/ b-/
0,
\
\
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
PUBLIC MEETING MINUTES
Re: Proposed Amendment Zoning By-Law
2005-ZBA-10, Concession 13, Part of Lot 13 (Bell)
(Medonte), Township of Oro-Medonte
June 13, 2005 @ 7:04 p.m. at the
Municipal Council Chambers
Present: Mayor J. Neil Craig
Deputy Mayor Harry Hughes
Councillor Dan Buttineau
Councillor Paul Marshall
Councillor Ralph Hough
Councillor John Crawford
Councillor Ruth Fountain
Staff Present: Jennifer Zieleniewski, CAO; Bruce Hoppe, Director of Planning;
Andria Leigh, Planning Consultant; Janette Teeter, Clerk's Assistant
Also Present: Don Bell; Helen Bell
Mayor J. Neil Craig called the meeting to order and explained the public meeting is to
obtain public comments on proposed amendment to the Zoning By-Law.
Notice of the Public Meeting was mailed to landowners within 120m (400 feet) of the
specified site on May 24, 2005 and posted on a sign on the subject property on May 24,
2005.
The following correspondence was received at the meeting: Simcoe County District
School Board dated May 4, 2005.
Bruce Hoppe, Director of Planning, provided an overview of the proposed amendment
to the Zoning By-Law.
The following persons offered verbal comments with respect to the proposed
amendment to the Zoning By-Law: None.
The Mayor advised that written submission will be received at the Township office until
June 16, 2005.
There being no further comments or questions, the meeting adjourned at 7:08 p.m.
A tape of the meeting is available for review at the Township Administration Centre, 148
Line 7 South.
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
PUBLIC MEETING MINUTES
Re: Proposed Amendment Zoning By-Law
2005-ZBA-11, Concession 6, East Part of Lot 2 (Woodrow)
(Medonte), Township of Oro-Medonte
June 13, 2005 @ 7:08 p.m. at the
Municipal Council Chambers
Present: Mayor J. Neil Craig
Deputy Mayor Harry Hughes
Councillor Dan Buttineau
Councillor Paul Marshall
Councillor Ralph Hough
Councillor John Crawford
Councillor Ruth Fountain
Staff Present: Jennifer Zieleniewski, CAO; Bruce Hoppe, Director of Planning;
Andria Leigh, Planning Consultant; Janette Teeter, Clerk's Assistant
Mayor J. Neil Craig called the meeting to order and explained the public meeting is to
obtain public comments on proposed amendment to the Zoning By-Law.
Notice of the Public Meeting was mailed to landowners within 120m (400 feet) of the
specified site on May 24, 2005 and posted on a sign on the subject property on May 24,
2005.
The following correspondence was received at the meeting: Simcoe County District
School Board dated May 4, 2005; County of Simcoe dated May 30, 2005.
Bruce Hoppe, Director of Planning, provided an overview of the proposed amendment
to the Zoning By-Law.
The following persons offered verbal comments with respect to the proposed
amendment to the Zoning By-Law: None.
The Mayor advised that written submission will be received at the Township office until
June 16, 2005.
There being no further comments or questions, the meeting adjourned at 7:11 p.m.
A tape of the meeting is available for review at the Township Administration Centre, 148
Line 7 South.
G
\c ~ \
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE MINUTES
2003-2006 TERM
June 13, 2005 @ 7:14 p.m.
Robinson Room / Council Chambers
Present:
Council Representatives
Mayor J. Neil Craig
Deputy Mayor Harry Hughes
Councillor Dan Buttineau
Councillor Ralph Hough
Councillor Paul Marshall
Councillor John Crawford
Councillor Ruth Fountain
Public Representatives
Terry Allison
Robert Barlow
Mel Coutanche
John Miller
Regrets:
Craig Drury
Staff Present:
Jennifer Zieleniewski, CAO; Bruce Hoppe, Director of Planning;
Nick McDonald, Meridian Planning Consultants Ltd.; Andria Leigh,
Planning Consultant; Janette Teeter, Clerk's Assistant
Also Present:
Jim Hartman; Kevin Anderson; Bryan Whitehead; Brandi Clement;
Geza Gaspardy; Gary Hatt; John Miller, Terry Allison, Mel
Coutanche, Robert Barlow; John Walls, Mary O'Farrell-Bowers;
Francis Bowers; Donna Gowland; Pat Woodford, Jim Woodford;
Isabelle Thiess; Gary Thiess; Janet Bumstead; Heather Squires;
Michael Squires; John Trezapelli, Kris Menzies; Martin Kimble;
Gerry Murfitt; Pam Murfitt; Anne Green
1. Opening of Meeting by Chair.
Mayor J. Neil Craig assumed the chair and called the meeting to order.
2. Adoption of Agenda.
Motion No. PAC-1
Moved by Mel Coutanche, Seconded by Terry Allison
It is recommended that the agenda for the Planning Advisory Committee meeting of
Monday, June 13,2005 be received and adopted.
Carried.
3. Declaration of Pecuniary Interest and the General Nature Thereof - in
Accordance with the Act.
l~
Ie -~
None declared.
4. Minutes of Previous Meetings - May 9, 2005
Motion No. PAC-2
Moved by Terry Allison, Seconded by Mel Coutanche
It is recommended that the minutes of the Planning Advisory Committee Meeting held
on May 9, 2005 be received and adopted.
Carried.
5. Correspondence and Communication.
None.
6. Planning Applications
(a) Planning Report presented by Bruce Hoppe, Director of Planning, Re: John
Walls - Part of Lots 2 and 3, Concession 1 (Oro), Application 2005-ZBA-08.
Motion No. PAC-3
Moved by Mel Coutanche, Seconded by Robert Barlow
It is recommended that
1. Report PD 2005-38, Bruce Hoppe, Director of Planning rei John Walls, Zoning By-
law Amendment Application 2005-ZBA-08, Concession 1, Part of Lots 2 and 3,
RP51 R-13186, Part 1 (Oro), Township of Oro-Medonte be received and adopted;
and that the Planning Advisory Committee recommend to Council
2. That Zoning By-law Amendment Application 2005-ZBA-08, Part of Lots 2 and 3,
Concession 1 (Oro) Township of Oro-Medonte submitted by John Walls be refused
as it does not conform with the Official Plan.
3. And Further That Mr. Walls be advised to adhere to the "Order to Comply".
Carried.
Planning Advisory Committee Meeting
June 13, 2005, Page 2
(
(b) Planning Report presented by Nick McDonald, Planning Consultant, Re:
Moon Point - Part of Lots 15 and 16, Concession 3 (Orillia), Applications
2004-SUB-01, 2004-0PA-02, and 2004-ZBA-09.
Motion No. PAC-4
Moved by Terry Allison, Seconded by Robert Barlow
It is recommended that
1. Report No. PD 2005-036, Nick McDonald, Planning Consultant, rei Moon Point
Development Application, Part of Lots 15 and 16, Concession 3 (Orillia),
Township of Oro-Medonte, File No's: 2004-Sub-01, 2004-0PA-02 and 2004-
ZBA-09 be received and adopted; and that the Planning Advisory Committee
recommends to Council
2. That Official Plan Amendment No. 21 as set out in Attachment #4 to Report No.
PD 2005-036 be adopted;
3. That Zoning By-Law as set out in Attachment #5 to Report No. PD 2005-036 be
passed;
4. That Draft Plan Approval to the lands proposed to be subdivided by the Moon
Point Corporation and application of the draft plan conditions as set out in
Attachment #6 to Report No. PD 2005-036 be granted;
5. And Further That cash-in-Iieu of parkland as part of the subdivision approval
process be accepted.
Lost.
(c) Planning Report presented by Nick McDonald, Planning Consultant, Re:
Horseshoe Resort Corporation - Part of Lot 1, Concession 3 (Medonte),
Application 2005-ZBA-15 and 2005-ZBA-16.
Motion No. PAC-5
Moved by John Miller, Seconded by Robert Barlow
It is recommended that
1. Report No. PD 2005-037, Nick McDonald, Planning Consultant, rei Application
for Rezoning - Horseshoe Resort Corporation, Parts 1, 17 and 41, Plan 51 R-
32830 (Medonte), Township of Oro-Medonte be received and adopted;
2. And Further That the Planning Advisory Committee recommend to Council that
Zoning By-law Amendment Application 2005-ZBA-15/16, Horseshoe Resort
Corporation, Parts 1, 17 and 41, Plan 51 R-32830 (Medonte), Township of Oro-
Medonte proceed to a Public Meeting in accordance with the provisions of the
Planning Act.
Carried.
Planning Advisory Committee Meeting
June 13, 2005, Page 3
~
7. Other Business
a) Next PAC Meeting - July 11, 2005
8. Adjournment
Motion No. PAC-6
Moved by John Miller, Seconded by Mel Coutanche
It is recommended that we do now adjourn at 9:25 p.m.
Carried.
Chair, Mayor J. Neil Craig
Director of Planning, Bruce Hoppe
Planning Advisory Committee Meeting
June 13, 2005, Page 4
...4""';~i~~
"i'..,~~/ - -~<,,~:;v
it -, 0'.
"'
\~
'"
~d-\
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
REPORT
Dept. Report No. To: Prepared By:
PD 2005-040 Committee of the Whole Andy Karaiskakis, Junior
Planner
Subject: Department:
Council
Zoning By-law Amendment for Planning
C.ofW. Donald Woodrow
Concession 6, East Part of Lot
2, (Medonte)
Date:
Motion # l..n..1A~
R.M. File No.
Date: D14014630
I~
I BACKGROUND:
The purpose of this report is to consider the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment application submitted
by Donald Woodrow. The intent of this application was to rezone a parcel of land that was severed by
the Committee of Adjustment for residential purposes in December 2004.
The application applies to lands legally described as Concession 6, East Part of Lot 2 in the Township of
Oro-Medonte (formerly Medonte). The intent of the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment is to rezone
the subject lands from the Agricultural/Rural (A/RU) Zone to the Rural Residential Two (RUR2) Zone to
reflect the intended residential usage.
,
t ANALYSIS:
In December 2004, the Committee of Adjustment granted a consent application for a new lot of
approximately 0.6 hectares (1.5 acres) in total land area which was intended to be utilized for residential
purposes. As the parcel was currently zoned Agricultural/Rural (A/RU), the Committee of Adjustment
included a condition in their decision that required the severed lot to be rezoned to a residential zone to
reflect the intended usage.
C'-\~ _:)
The applicant submitted the application for rezoning and a public meeting as required by the Planning
Act was held on June 13,2005. At the time this report was written, favorable written comments were
received from the County of Simcoe and the Simcoe County District School Board.
The proposed Zoning By-law Amendment would conform with the intent and policies of the Oro-Medonte
Official Plan and the County of Simcoe Official Plan. On this basis, it is recommended that a Zoning By-
law Amendment be given favorable consideration by Council.
,
II RECOMMENDATION (S):
1. THAT this report be received and adopted; and
2. That a zoning by-law amendment for Donald Woodrow, that would rezone the lands described as
Concession 6, East Part of Lot 2 (Medonte), on Schedule A20 of Zoning By-law 97-95, as
amended from the Agricultural/Rural (A/RU) Zone to the Rural Residential Two (RUR2) Zone be
given favorable consideration; and
3. That the Clerk bring forward the appropriate by-law for Council's consideration.
Respectfully submitted,
1~~
Junior Planner
~dby
Bruce H~~P~
Director of Planning
C.A.O. Comments:
Date:
/
oS
tJJ~
J
Dept. Head
C.A.O.
2
~J.-
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF ORO-MEDONTE
BY.LAW NO. 2005-
Being a By~law to change the zoning on lands within Concession 6, East
Part of Lot 2 (Medonte) now in the Township of Oro-Medonte (Woodrow -
Roll # 43-46-020-010-05800-0000).
WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte is empowered to pass
By.laws to regulate the use of land pursuant to Section 34 of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990,
c.P.13.
AND WHEREAS Council deems it appropriate to fe-zone the lands to permit the development of
rural residential uses, in accordance with Section D3 of the Official Plan
AND WHEREAS Council deems it appropriate to place the subject land in a zone with yard
requirements that are better suited for the subject lot;
NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte enacts as
follows:
1. Schedule 'A20' to Zoning By-law No. 97-95 as amended, is hereby further amended by
changing the zone symbol applying to the lands located in Concession 6, East Part of Lot
2, in the former geographic Township of Medonte, now in the Township of Oro-Medonte,
from the Agricultural/Rural (AlRU) Zone to the Rural Residential Two (RUR2) Zone as
shown on Schedule 'A-1' attached hereto and forming part of this By-law.
2. This By-law shall come into effect upon the date of passage hereof, subject to the
provisions of the Planning Act, as amended.
READ A FIRST AND SECOND TIME on the _ day of
.2005.
READ A THIRD TIME and finally passed this _ day of
.2005.
J. Neil Craig, Mayor
Marilyn Pennycook, Clerk
i
,
ri
~
Schedule IA_i1 to By-Law
This is Schedule 'A-1' to By-Law 2005-
J. Neil Craig
P
"lS
N
passed the day of
Mayor
Clerk
Marilyn Pennycook
lands subject to the rezoning
~~~\
....0 Ii<
<:,0
:'\'}.~\
....0 Ii<
<:,0 .
'],\)1"
:'<.-\~\
....0 Ii<
<:,0
I
,
I
,
i
.
~
"'1-,,
....0 Ii<
<:,0
Township of Oro.Medonte
\
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
REPORT
Dept. Report No. To: Prepared By:
PD 2005-041 Committee of the Whole Andy Karaiskakis, Junior
Planner
Subject: Department:
Council
Zoning By-law Amendment for Planning
C.ofW. Don & Helen Bell
Concession 13, West Part of
Lot 13, (Medonte)
Date:
Motion # .Il1n.. 1A ?nnJ<
R.M. File No.
Date: D14014612
I~
II BACKGROUND:
The purpose of this report is to consider the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment application submitted
by Don & Helen Bell. The intent of this application was to rezone a parcel of land that was severed by
the Committee of Adjustment for residential purposes in August 2004.
The application applies to lands legally described as Concession 13, West Part of Lot 13 in the
Township of Oro-Medonte (formerly Medonte). The intent of the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment is
to rezone the subject lands from the Agricultural/Rural (AlRU) Zone to the Rural Residential Two (RUR2)
Zone to reflect the intended residential usage.
-
II ANALYSIS:
In August 2004, the Committee of Adjustment granted a consent application for a new lot of
approximately 0.37 hectares (0.91 acres) in total land area which was intended to be utilized for
residential purposes. As the parcel was currently zoned Agricultural/Rural (AlRU), the Committee of
Adjustment included a condition in their decision that required the severed lot to be rezoned to a
residential zone to reflect the intended usage.
The applicant submitted the application for rezoning and a public meeting as required by the Planning
Act was held on June 13, 2005. At the time this report was written, favorable written comments were
received from the Simcoe County District School Board. Comments were not received from the County
of Simcoe.
The proposed Zoning By-law Amendment would conform with the intent and policies of the Oro-Medonte
Official Plan and the County of Simcoe Official Plan. On this basis, it is recommended that a Zoning By-
law Amendment be given favorable consideration by Council.
I~
II RECOMMENDATION (5):
1. THAT this report be received and adopted; and
2. That a zoning by-law amendment for Don & Helen Bell, that would rezone the lands described as
Concession 13, West Part of Lot 13 (Medonte), on Schedule A23 of Zoning By-law 97-95, as
amended from the Agricultural/Rural (A/RU) Zone to the Rural Residential Two (RUR2) Zone be
given favorable consideration; and
3. That the Clerk bring forward the appropriate by-law for Council's consideration.
ReT.: ,ctfcuu""I1YY s "bmil"'.
~Iv....r
Anoy Karaiskakis
Junior Planner
~... vieewwed by,
"~~,
Bruce Hoppe, MC1P, RPP
Director of Planning
C.A.O. Comments:
Date.
/CJJ ~
C.A.O.
J
Dept. Head
2
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF ORD-MEDDNTE
BY-LAW NO. 2005-
Being a By-law to change the zoning on lands within Concession 13, West
Part of Lot 13 (Medonte) now in the Township of Oro-Medonte (Bell- Roll #
43.46-020-006-08200-0000).
WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Township of Ora-Medonte is empowered to pass
By-laws to regulate the use of land pursuant to SecUon 34 of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990,
c.P.13.
AND WHEREAS Council deems it appropriate to fe-zone the lands to permit the development of
rural residential uses, in accordance with Sections D2 & D3 of the Official Plan
AND WHEREAS Council deems it appropriate to place the subject land in a zone with yard
requirements that are better suited for the subject lot;
NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Corporation of the Township of Oro~Medonte enacts as
follows:
1. Schedule 'A23' to Zoning By-law No. 97-95 as amended, is hereby further amended by
changing the zone symbol applying to the lands located in Concession 13, West Part of
Lot 13, in the former geographic Township of Medonte, now in the Township of Oro~
Medonte, from the Agricultural/Rural (AlRU) Zone to the Rural Residential Two (RUR2)
Zone as shown on Schedule 'A-1' attached hereto and forming part of this By~law.
2. This By-law shall come into effect upon the date of passage hereof, subject to the
provisions of the Planning Act, as amended.
READ A FIRST AND SECOND TIME on the _ day of
,2005.
READ A THIRD TIME and finally passed this _ day of
,2005.
J. Neil Craig, Mayor
Marilyn Pennycook, Clerk
Schedule IA_i1 to By-Law
This is Schedule 'A-1' to By-Law 2005-
J. Neil Craig
P
'OilS
N
passed the day of
Mayor
Clerk
Marilyn pennycook
\ ~ "~" ~
~ / 4t$%~t$ / ~
&/&;
$ro
q
""<?
Lands subject
to the rezoning -.....
-f-\\
c,o~,,'O
,,0
(} 40 00 160 Meiers
'",E",j
Township of Oro.Medonte
\
~ ,
J
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
REPORT
Dept. Report No. To: Committee of the Prepared By:
PD2005-036 Whole Nick McDonald, RPP
Subject: Moon Point Department:
Development Planning
Applications
Council
File No: 2004-Sub-01,
C. of 2004-0PA-02 and Date: June 22, 2005
W. 2004-ZBA-09
Motion R.M. File #:
# D12013640
Date: RolI#:
030-012-42700
INTRODUCTION
The intent of this report is to review the comments made by agencies and members of the public
with respect to the applications for development submitted by the Moon Point Corporation. A
further intent of this report is to provide Planning Advisory Committee and Council with
recommendations on the applications for development.
As Planning Advisory Committee/Council will recall, the Moon Point Corporation is seeking
approval for an Official Plan Amendment which places a portion of the lands in the Shoreline
designation, a Zoning By-law Amendment that places a portion of the lands in the Shoreline
Residential zone, and a Plan of Subdivision application that would allow for the creation of 14
new shoreline lots.
Each of the 14 lots will front on a new public road that extends from Moon Point Drive. Each of
the lots will also have direct water frontage as well. The minimum lot frontage on the road is 21.8
metres (Lot 4) and the highest lot frontage on the road is approximately 50 metres (Lot 1). The
average lot frontage along the road is 27.9 metres. The minimum lot frontage on the water is
47.6 metres (Lot 11). The highest lot frontage along the water is 61 metres (Lot 14). The
average lot frontage along the water is 49 metres. Each of the lots will have a minimum lot area
of 0.60 hectares. An 8-1/2 x 11 reduction of the Plan of Subdivision is attached to this report as
Attachment #1.
Each of the proposed lots will be serviced by private wells and septic systems. A dry hydrant
accessible to pumper trucks will be installed at the end of the Moon Point Road unopened road
allowance, at Lake Simcoe. It is proposed that the dry hydrant be provided as a suitable
substitute to an on-site fire well and fire storage as required by the Township's engineering
standards.
The homes on the lot will be set back a minimum of 20 metres from the average high water mark
as per the requirements of the Township's Zoning By-law. A detailed Concept Plan prepared by
the applicant shows the location of each of the homes, the driveways, the septic systems and
proposed access corridors to Lake Simcoe. These access corridors will be no wider than 12
metres. The proponent has indicated that based on the sizes of the lots and the setbacks
proposed, 60% of each of the lots will remain in forest cover. The detailed Concept Plan is
attached to this report as Attachment #2.
In order to deal with issues respecting building location, septic system location, driveway location
and access corridor siting, each of the lots will be subject to Site Plan Control. It is also proposed
as a condition of draft plan approval that a detailed site plan for the entire subdivision be
prepared. This detailed site plan would provide the basis for the individual Site Plan Agreements
that would be entered into following the registration of the Plan of Subdivision. This was the
same process recently followed for a 13 lot Plan of Subdivision on Highland Drive in the
Horseshoe Resort community.
Adjacent land uses include the Columbus Boys Camp located to the west and south of the
proposed lots. This camp will be retained by the owner (the Moon Point Corporation) and is not
part of the Plan of Subdivision. Lands to the south of the proposed Plan of Subdivision are the
site of a registered Plan of Subdivision (Plan 940) located on the east side of Moon Point Drive.
There are 18 lots within this Plan of Subdivision. The average lot frontage on the street is 34.8
metres. The average lot area is 0.18 hectares. Each of these lots is developed with a home.
The first home in Plan 940 was built in 1955 (lot 4). The remaining homes were developed slowly
over a period of 45 years.
LAKE SIMCOE REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY COMMENTS
The Township of Oro-Medonte relies upon the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority
(LSRCA) to provide advice and recommendations on environmental matters. As part of their role,
the LSRCA reviews the majority of applications submitted pursuant to the Planning Act.
In this case, the applications and the supporting documentation were sent to the LSRCA in mid
2004. Prior to the submission of the initial reports, the LSRCA met with the proponents in 2003 to
discuss Environmental Impact Study requirements.
On September 17, 2004, the LSRCA indicated in writing that they required some additional
information from the proponent to complete their review of the applications. Following the
submission of a revised Environmental Impact Statement in October 2004 and a meeting on site
on October 28, 2004, the LSRCA sent an additional letter dated January 12, 2005 requesting
some additional information to complete their review.
2
Following the submission of a further revised Environmental Impact Statement in May 2005, the
LSRCA provided a commenting letter to the Township of Oro-Medonte dated June 2, 2005. This
LSRCA letter is attached to this report as Attachment #3. Below are a number of quotes from the
June 2, 2005 LSRCA letter:
. 'The study meets the intent of our Terms of Reference at that time (2003) as well as our
current Terms of Reference. The field survey program was scoped based on the site
characteristics. The technical information presented in the report is satisfactory".
. "Based on the additional technical information provided, we do not consider this to be a
significant wildlife area based on breeding birds, as such, all potential natural heritage
features have now been addressed through the EIS."
. 'We have no concerns with potential impacts from natural hazards. "
. 'We recommend that the Township require the following aspects to be addressed as part
of the subdivision conditions as the design of the development should be reviewed on a
comprehensive basis for the property rather than through future individual owners.
Measures to preserve the integrity of the shoreline and tree cover are acceptable
provided that the following aspects are included."
On the basis of the above, the LSRCA is supportive of the approval of the requested Official Plan
Amendment, Draft Plan of Subdivision and Zoning By-law Amendment. However, they have
made a number of detailed requests regarding each of the documents that will be under
consideration by Council. Specifically, it is requested that:
1. The Official Plan Amendment (OPA) contain some policies that provide some direction on
the nature of vegetation removal in the 20 metre shoreline setback area, the need for
further approvals regarding shoreline works and vegetation retention on the property;
2. The Draft Plan Approval contain conditions that deal with grading, drainage, erosion and
siltation, the need for LSRCA approvals, the need to prepare a Tree Preservation Plan
and Shoreline Access Plan, and the need to prepare a Natural Environment Stewardship
Manual;
3. The Subdivision Agreement include requirements in the Notice of Offers of Purchase and
Sale that indicate that water access and views of Lake Simcoe are restricted through the
Zoning By-law, Tree Preservation Plan and Shoreline Access Plan, and that a Natural
Environment Stewardship Manual has been prepared; and,
4. The Township Zoning By-law Amendment applying to the property includes specific
provisions restricting development within 20 metres of the shoreline and which also
restricts the width of the shoreline access area to 12 metres.
One of the more important conditions requires the preparation of a Tree Preservation Plan and
Shoreline Access Plan to the satisfaction of the LSRCA. Such a Plan must have input from a
registered professional forester. It is the intent of such a Plan to identify development envelopes
that alter no more than 40% of each lot, thereby retaining approximately 60% of each lot in a non-
manicured vegetative state.
3
It is my opinion that the LSRCA has made every effort to respond to the concerns expressed by
residents regarding the impacts of development on the environment. On the basis of the LSRCA
comments and their recommendations respecting the Official Plan Amendment, the Draft Plan of
Subdivision and the Zoning By-law Amendment, it is my opinion that development can proceed
as proposed. All of the conditions discussed above are reviewed later in this report and have
been included within the Official Plan Amendment, the Draft Plan Conditions and the Zoning By-
law Amendment, as required.
PUBLIC SUBMISSIONS
The public meeting was held on March 21, 2005. Approximately 45 members of the public were
in attendance. During the public meeting, and following the public meeting written submissions
were received from:
NAME DATE
Janet Bumstead April 1 , 11 and 15, 2005
Jim Woodford March 30 and 31, 2005
Anna Arnold April 7, 2005
Bob and Dodi Weill April 8, 2005
Donna Gowland April 11 , 2005
Kirsten Burling Aoril1 0,2005
L vnne and Lionel Walters April 7, 2005
William Moore April 12, 2005
John and Carolyne Macdonald April 13, 2005
Mark Rosati and Margaret Burghardt April 11, 2005
Les and Paula Kirsh April 29, 2005
Teresa Reckret April 13, 2005
Anne Green April 15, 2005
Jessie Alexander March 21, 2005
Sheila Wood April 15, 2005
Francis Bowers and Marv O'Farrell-Bowers April 29, 2005
Brian and Heather Crate April 4, 2005
Garvand Isabelle Thiess April 14, 2005
Gerrv and Pam Murfitt April 29, 2005
Moon Point Resident's Association April 12, 2005
A summary of the main points raised in the submissions and our responses are below:
1. Submission - The Township should consider acquiring the property for public use.
Response - The acquisition of the lands for public use is a Council decision. However,
given the opinion and recommendations of the LSRCA and the current policy framework
respecting shoreline development, it is my opinion that Council should focus more on
acquiring property that is the site of significant natural heritage features, such as lands on
the Oro Moraine.
2. Submission - The proposed development will have a negative impact on the
natural heritage features and functions on the site and beyond.
4
Response - The LSRCA has carefully reviewed the proposal in accordance with the
Provincial Policy Statement, the County of Simcoe Official Plan and the Township Official
Plan to determine what impact the proposal will have on the environment. The LSRCA
has concluded that there are no significant features or functions on the site.
On this basis, they have clearly indicated that they have no opposition to the
development of the site, provided a number of detailed conditions are incorporated into
the approvals to ensure that development occurs as planned. Specifically, conditions will
require that a certain percentage of the tree cover on the property be retained during and
after construction and that an access/view corridor to the lake having a maximum width of
12 metres be permitted.
3. Submission - The proponent's environmental impact statement has not complied
with the standards set out by the LSRCA regarding the preparation of such
studies.
Response - In their June 2, 2005 letter, the LSRCA has indicated that the work
completed by the proponents was completed in accordance with their requirements.
4. Submission - The Township does not have the staff or consulting expertise to
carry out an environmental analysis of the property.
Response - The Township relies upon the LSRCA to carry out reviews of Environmental
Impact Studies on behalf of the Township of Oro-Medonte. It is my opinion and the
opinion of the Township that the LSRCA has the staff expertise to properly assess and
consider applications for development on behalf of the Municipality.
In the carrying out of their duties, they typically work with a proponent to determine
exactly what needs to be studied and what their requirements will be prior to making a
final recommendation. Throughout this process, the LSRCA has met with residents, staff
and the proponent on numerous occasions to ensure that it had a complete
understanding of the issues and was able to provide objective advice to the Township
with respect to this application.
5. Submission - The reports prepared by the proponent do not address the fisheries
resources on Lake Simcoe. In addition, extremely long docks would be required as
a result of the shallowness of the water and these docks would have a negative
impact on the fisheries.
Response - The final Environmental Impact Statement prepared by the proponents
contains a review of the fisheries resources on this part of Lake Simcoe. It is concluded
that the "nearshore fish community is dominated by forage species, primarily shiners,
minnows and allies, with a seasonal habitat use by yellow perch and smallmouth bass.
This community type is common to Lake Simcoe and to other adjacent waterbodies in
southern Ontario. There is no evidence of coldwater fish community production, for
example lake whitefish, using nearshore habitat in this vicinity for either spawning or
nursery habitat."
The LSRCA has not indicated that they have a concern with the proponent's submission
in this regard. However, it is recommended that conditions be included within the
5
approvals that would require the approval of the LSRCA, the Ministry of Natural
Resources (MNR) and/or the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) for any works
in the shoreline. This is the approach typically followed by the LSRCA for small-scale
developments where individual docking facilities may be proposed. There is no guarantee
that a permit will be issued by the LSRCA for a dock on the site.
6. Submission - The approvals for the proposed development should either be
refused or deferred given that an Assimilative Capacity Study of Lake Simcoe is
currently underway.
Response - The Assimilative Capacity Study currently being undertaken by the Province
and the LSRCA will be completed in 2006. Generally, the LSRCA is concerned about the
amount of phosphorous leaching into the lake from sewage disposal systems, farming
activities and general runoff from roads. Both the Province and the County have
indicated that planning applications in process need not be delayed until the study has
been completed. In addition, one of the primary focuses of the Assimilative Capacity
Study and the work emanating from that study will be an assessment of sewage
treatment options for large-scale urban development within the Lake Simcoe Watershed.
Given the limited amount of shoreline available in the Township of Oro-Medonte for low-
density residential development on private septic systems, no concern has been
expressed by the LSRCA about the added impact of developing 14 homes on the
property on the lake. However, it is my opinion that it would be appropriate to further
study private sewage disposal options on the property to ensure that only systems that
have minimal to non-existent impacts on the environment in terms of nutrients and
phosphorous are developed. In addition, retaining about 60% of the tree cover on the
property will assist in minimizing the amount of phosphorous that enters into the lake
from the proposed development.
7. Submission - The introduction of 14 property owners will have an impact on the
seasonal birds and other animals that make use of the shoreline.
Response - The proponents have indicated that the breeding birds using the property
are likely to adapt to habitat changes on the site. In addition, it proposed to ensure that
all construction on site take place in accordance with the Migratory Bird Convention Act.
Lastly, the retention of the majority of the trees on the site will ensure that there are
minimal impacts on habitat. It should be noted that the LSRCA has indicated that "we do
not consider this to be a significant wildlife habitat based on breeding birds...."
8. Submission - The lands are unsuitable for development as a result of the depth of
the water table.
Response - It is agreed that the water table is elevated on the lands. As a result, the
proposed leaching beds will have to be raised approximately 1.0 metre above grade and
the homes will be elevated. This is a typical response to elevated water table conditions
and has been considered acceptable in other locations. In addition, the detailed
storm water management report prepared as a condition of draft plan approval will also
address this issue.
6
g. Submission - The mitigation measures proposed by the developer will not work (or
are unlikely to work).
Response - A number of conditions are required to be fulfilled as a condition of Draft
Plan Approval. In addition, individual Site Plan Agreements entered into pursuant to the
Planning Act are also required. The Site Plan Agreement will contain a number of
provisions that will require the property owner to ensure that the mitigation measures
recommended by the LSRCA are implemented. However, there is always the possibility
that an individual lot owner will not comply with the agreement. As a result, the Site Plan
Agreement will contain provisions that provide the Township with the ability to order
remedial works and/or carry out the remedial works and bill the individual lot owner. The
Township can also prosecute a breach of the Site Plan Agreement through the courts.
With respect to tree loss, many of the older developments in the Township were not
subject to any specific controls regarding the retention of trees on their properties. As a
result, many of the trees on existing lots on the shorelines of Lake Simcoe and Bass Lake
have been lost. It is for this reason that the Official Plan requires minimum lot sizes of
0.6 hectares to maximize the amount of trees retained on a property. This minimum lots
size, coupled with subdivision agreements and site plan conditions will go along way to
ensuring that the maximum number of trees are retained on each lot.
10. Submission - The proposed development will not be consistent with the Provincial
Policy Statement (PPS) and will not be in conformity with the Township's Official
Plan.
Response - The PPS (March 2005) states in Section 2.1.3 that development shall not be
permitted in significant habitat of endangered and threatened species, in significant
wetlands and in significant coastal wetlands. These features do not exist on the property,
or within 120 metres of the lands to be subdivided.
Section 2.1.4 of the PPS states that development may be permitted in significant
woodlands, significant valleylands, significant wildlife habitat areas and in significant
areas of natural and scientific interest provided it "has been demonstrated that there will
be no negative impacts on the natural features or their ecological functions." The LSRCA
has confirmed that none of the above features exist on the lands to be subdivided and
have indicated that they have no objection to the approval of the applications.
With respect to the Township Official Plan, Council did adopt an Amendment to the
Township of Oro-Medonte Official Plan that included very specific criteria in the Official
Plan to deal with applications within the shoreline area. These criteria were subsequently
approved by the County of Simcoe in February 2005 with no appeals. These criteria are
considered later in this report, however, it should be noted that the proposed
development will conform with these criteria in every respect.
11. Submission - Construction will have an impact on the flow of ground water in the
area, particularly with respect to flooding.
7
Response - Shallow groundwater flow on the site is expected to be primarily eastwards
and northwards towards Lake Simcoe. As a result of the elevated water table on the site,
both the homes and the septic systems will be raised, which should minimize impacts.
The construction of the road may also have impacts on the flow of groundwater. The
storm water management report prepared as a condition of draft plan approval will
address this issue.
12. Submission - The property is one of the last remaining natural areas along the
shoreline and therefore should be preserved.
Response - It is agreed that the subject property is one of the last remaining properties
along the Lake Simcoe shoreline in Oro-Medonte that has not been developed.
However, there is no policy framework in place at the provincial, county or local level that
is intended to preclude development from occurring for this reason alone. Instead, the
policies require the careful consideration of the impacts of development and the suitability
of the lands for development. It is on this basis that the LSRCA was asked to review the
site and the supporting studies.
It is also agreed that there is some benefit in retaining these natural areas over the long
term. However, this benefit must also be balanced against the aspirations of a
landowner, the policies of the Township's Official Plan and the presence/absence of
significant wildlife habitat or other natural heritage features on the lands.
13. Submission - The reduced lot frontage on the road for the majority of the lots is
inappropriate.
Response - It is agreed that the lots will have reduced frontages at the road. However,
all of the lots will have larger than required frontages on the water. Given the lot sizes
involved (minimum lot size 0.6 hectares) and the depth of the lots, a reduced lot frontage
at the road is considered to be appropriate. The large minimum lot size of 0.6 hectares is
considerably larger than the existing lots that are located to the south of the subject
property along Moon Point Drive. This larger lot area allows for the nesting of the
proposed development in the existing environment.
14. Submission - The proposed development will act as a precedent for future
development in the area.
Response - With respect to precedent, the policies of the Official Plan currently prohibit
the development of new residential lots on the fringe of the City of Orillia. The exception
is along the shoreline where such development can be designed to blend in and be
compatible with existing shoreline development. Given the location of the property and
the policies of the current Official Plan, it is my opinion that the development will not set a
precedent for additional development along Woodland Drive leading to Memorial Road in
the City of Orillia.
15. Submission - The lands are currently environmentally protected and should be
maintained as such.
Response - The lands are not designated Environmental Protection 1 or Environmental
Protection 2 by the Township of Oro-Medonte Official Plan. The Environmental
8
Protection 1 designation applies to those features that are considered to be significant
according to the Provincial Policy Statement. The Environmental Protection 2
designation is intended to apply to lands which are not considered to be significant, but
which contribute to the integrity of the Township's Natural Heritage system.
Notwithstanding the above there is small area of land on the Moon Point property that is
zoned Environmental Protection. However, this zoning has been deemed to be incorrect
by both the Township and the LSRCA, since it was intended to apply to a watercourse.
Such a watercourse, while appearing on old base maps of the area, does not exist on the
site.
16. Submission - The proposal will have a negative impact on the wetlands in the area.
Response - The development is located further than 120 metres from the closest
wetland. On this basis, the LSRCA does not have any concerns about the impact on the
proposed development on wetlands in the area.
17. Submission - The construction traffic, in addition to the traffic generated from the
new homes, will have an impact on the area.
Response - It is agreed that there will be additional traffic to the site during the
construction. However, local Township roads are designed to accommodate up to 1000
to 2000 vehicles per day. At the present time, Moon Point Drive does not support that
amount of traffic. As a result, the impact of the additional traffic will be minimal to non-
existent.
18. Submission - Locating a cul-de-sac on the property is not good planning.
Response - The plan for a cul-de-sac on the property is the most appropriate solution for
development on the site. Creating a through street on the site would result in more
property being utilized for development and more disturbance and tree loss.
19. Submission - The approvals would create a precedent with respect to the
remainder of the camp property.
Response - With respect to the remainder of the camp property, we are not aware of any
plans on the part of the camp to develop the remainder of their property. These plans
would have to be supported by an additional amendment to the Official Plan and Zoning
By-law and a new Plan of Subdivision application. In addition, Council would have to
consent to the lifting of 0.3 metre reserve that will be placed on the end of the cul-de-sac.
20. Submission - The development will have an impact on the private wells in the area.
Response - It is my opinion that the assessment has clearly established that the principle
of developing 14 lots on the basis of private wells and septic systems is supportable.
However, more detailed work will be completed as part of the draft approval process and
such work will have to be to the Township's satisfaction before any final approvals are
given.
9
~\
ANALYSIS
Description and Rationale of Existing Official Plan Policy
In August 2003, Council adopted Official Plan Amendment No. 17. OPA 17 deleted the last
sentence of Section D10.3.8 which states:
'f:\ny amendment to this Plan that has the effect of permitting additional
residential development adjacent to the Shoreline designation will only be
considered as part of a review of the appropriateness of the extent and limits of
the entire Shoreline designation that is carried out and is part of an Official Plan
review. "
OPA 17 replaced the above sentence with the following:
'f:\mendments to this Plan that have the effect of permitting additional residential
development adjacent to the Shoreline designation will be discouraged. If such
an application is submitted, the appropriateness of the immediate area for
development from an environmental, servicing, character and traffic perspective
shall be assessed. If major development is proposed, a detailed review of the
entire Shoreline Area shall be carried out to determine if the proposed location is
suitabte and appropriate from a growth management perspective."
It was my initial recommendation during the Official Plan review that the Shoreline policies be
modified, since there were a limited number of circumstances under which it was felt that
development could occur, under the right conditions. As a result, initial drafts of the proposed
policy change included a number of conditions that would have provided the basis for considering
such requests. These conditions dealt with servicing, traffic, location, size of lots and
environmental impact. However, the criteria were not incorporated in the final draft of OPA 17
adopted by Council and instead, the policy only referenced the issues that needed to be
considered by Council in a review and an application in the future.
In order to provide some time to review the wording of this Section, Council requested the County
of Simcoe to not make a decision on the modification to Section D10.3.8. The intent of the
request was to ensure that the original intent of Council as articulated in the adopted version of
OPA 17 was more clearly articulated. The result was the preparation of a more detailed policy to
provide and appropriate basis for the consideration of applications for development in the
Shoreline Area in the future. This revised policy, as modified by the County of Simcoe, is below.
'The further expansion of the shoreline development area onto lands that are not
designated Shoreline is not permitted by this Plan. Exceptions may be granted
through the approval of an Official Plan Amendment if the expansion is small in
scale, and is either focused on the shoreline or is considered to be infilling.
Infilling is defined as development that abuts a developed area on two sides
and/or is located within a parcel of land that abuts public roads on at least three
sides. The creation of strip development across from existing development on
existing public roads is not contemplated by this Plan.
Council may consider such minor amendments to the Official Plan to redesignate
lands for such limited shoreline development, provided Council is satisfied that:
10
\ \
-- \ \
a) The lots will have a minimum area of 0.6 hectares to a maximum area of
approximately 1.0 hectare, except where larger sizes may be suitable
because of environmental constraints or design considerations;
b) The majority of the existing tree cover on the proposed lots is retained
and protected as part of the approvals process;
c) The development s compatible, in terms of scale, density and character,
with existing development;
d) The proposed lots, if located on the shoreline, have a water frontage of
no tess than 45 metres; and,
e) The lots would conform to the general subdivision and consent policies
ofthis Plan.
For Plans of Subdivision that involve the creation of lots with water frontage, only
a single tier of lots shall be created, all with water frontage as set out in Section
010.3.6 of this Plan. In addition, no new lots with direct access to County Roads
are permitted.
If major development is proposed (which is defined as development that does not
meet the above criteria), a detailed review of the entire shoreline area shall be
carried out to determine if the proposed location is suitable and appropriate from
a growth management perspective."
Conformity of Proposal with the Township Official Plan
The subject lands are designated Restricted Rural in the Oro-Medonte Official Plan. It is
proposed that the lands be designated Shoreline.
The vision of the Official Plan recognizes that the Township's open, relatively natural and rural
character is the quality that residents value most about their community. Section A2.3 of the
Official Plan states that one of the primary principles of the Plan is to consolidate rural
development in existing Settlement Areas to protect the character of rural areas. In addition, it
adds "to ensure that there is a clear spatial delineation between the Barrie and Orillia urban areas
and the rural and agricultural area of Oro-Medonte, new development adjacent to either City shall
be restricted to agricultural and agricultural-related uses".
Although the proposed residential development is located close to the Oro-Medonte/City of Orillia
border, the two areas would most likely never be joined by residential development. To the
northeast of the property are low swampy lands that are unsuited for development and which are
part of the Bluffs Creek wetland, which is considered to be a Provincially Significant Wetland.
The presence of these lowlands within the City of Orillia and in Oro-Medonte will ensure that a
clear spatial delineation is maintained between the built form of Orillia and Oro-Medonte.
With respect to Section D10.3.8, as modified, below is my opinion on how the proposed
development conforms with the criteria set out in that Section.
1. The policy indicates that "exceptions may be granted through the approval of an Official
Plan Amendment if the expansion is small in scale, and is either focused on the shoreline
or is considered to be infilling". Given that the 14 lots proposed are focused on the
shoreline, the consideration of an Official Plan Amendment by Council is permitted by the
policy.
11
2. The policy requires that lots have a minimum area of 0.6 hectares and a maximum area
of 1 hectare. All of the lots will have a minimum lot area of 0.6 hectares.
3. The policy requires that the "majority of the existing tree cover on the proposed lots is
retained and protected as part of the approvals process". The proponent has indicated
that 60% of the vegetation on each lot will be retained. This percentage will be
incorporated within the Subdivision Agreement and the Site Plan Agreements that will be
registered on title. As a result, this policy has been satisfied.
4. The policy requires that the development be "compatible, in terms of scale, density and
character, with existing development". The proposed shoreline residential lots will have
lot areas that are much larger than the majority of existing lots along the shoreline. The
larger lot size will provide opportunities for the retention of the majority of vegetation on
each lot. In addition, given the location of the lots and the limited amount of land
available for shoreline development around Lake Simcoe, it is anticipated that the homes
will be relatively upscale in nature and well maintained. Lastly, each of the 14 lots will be
accessed by a new public road that intersects with Moon Point Road at an appropriate
location. It is not anticipated that the traffic generated from the 14 lots will have a
measurable impact on the character of the area.
5. The policy requires that each of the proposed lots with water frontage have a water
frontage of no less than 45 metres. Each of the lots will conform with this policy.
6. The policy also requires that the proposal conform with the general subdivision and
consent policies of the Official Plan. On the basis of a review of those policies contained
in the Official Plan, as amended by OPA 17 (Section D2.3), and on the basis of a review
of Section 51 (24) of the Planning Act, as amended, it is my opinion that the proposed
development conforms with those policies in every respect.
It is on the basis of the above that it is recommended that Planning Advisory Committee/Council
adopt the Official Plan Amendment, grant Draft Plan of Subdivision Approval and pass the
Implementing Zoning By-law with a Holding provision.
DOCUMENTATION
The applicant has applied to amend the Official Plan, the Zoning By-law and to obtain approval
for a draft Plan of Subdivision. Given that this report recommends that the applications be
approved, below is a brief discussion on the form of each of the documents that will provide for
the development.
Official Plan
It is proposed to include site-specific policies in the Shoreline Section of the Official Plan that
would provide very clear guidance on how development on the property is to proceed.
Specifically, the policies will require that detailed site plans be prepared for each lot prior to final
approval and that each lot be the subject of Site Plan Control following final approval of the Plan
of Subdivision. In addition, the policies clearly articulate the intent of the Township with respect to
maintaining forest cover on each of the lots through the site planning process. The proposed
OPA is attached to this report as Attachment #4.
Zoning By-law
It is proposed to place the property in the Shoreline Residential zone. The only exception
required to the zone standards is for the minimum lot frontage. However, it is also appropriate to
12
include a restriction on the number of lots to be developed as well. As a result, the exception will
limit the number of lots permitted on the property to 14 and will provide for a minimum lot frontage
of 22 metres. The Zoning By-law will include a Holding provision that shall not be lifted until Site
Plan agreements have been entered into between the Township of Oro-Medonte and individual
lot owners. The draft Zoning By-law is attached to this report as Attachment #5.
Plan of Subdivision
A comprehensive review of all of the supporting reports and the agency comments has been
undertaken as part of the process of developing a series of draft plan conditions that would apply
to the property. While many of the draft plan conditions are standard conditions that would apply
to any subdivision in the Township, there are a number of unique conditions that are intended to
ensure that the specific recommendations of the LSRCA are implemented. A brief description of
these unique conditions is below.
1. Condition 6 requires the preparation of detailed plans showing:
a) storm water management measures;
b) general lot grading including existing and proposed elevations;
c) building envelopes;
d) septic system locations;
e) driveway locations;
f) erosion control measures;
g) site servicing including water, hydro, telephone, cable tv and gas services, as
well as main line utilities and appurtenances in the road allowance; and,
h) areas where existing vegetation is to be retained.
2. Condition 12 requires that the Subdivision Agreement contain provisions notifying
prospective purchasers that a Site Plan Agreement between individual lot owners and the
Township will be required before building permits can be issued.
3. Condition 19 requires that a common drainage swale system be designed at the rear of
the septic systems and primarily along the 20 metre shoreline setback limit to ensure that
there is some level of water flow to the ponding area locations adjacent to the berm.
4. Condition 20 indicates that the Subdivision Agreement will include provisions that notify
prospective purchasers that specific approvals will be required for any dock construction
on the property.
5. Condition 29 requires that a Tree Preservation and Shoreline Access Plan be prepared.
It is within this Plan that 60% of each lot will be shown as being retained in a non-
manicured vegetative state.
6. Condition 30 requires that a Natural Environment Stewardship manual be prepared. This
manual is intended to educate lot owners on the value of the woodlands and ephemeral
pools on the property.
The suggested draft plan conditions are attached to this report as Attachment #6. It should be
noted that the conditions require either a 5% land dedication for parkland or cash-in-lieu of
parkland. The draft plan does not show a parkland block. It is my opinion that it would be more
appropriate for the Township to collect cash-in-lieu of parkland in this case since the siting of a
13
~t l.\
park for public use on the lands to be subdivided is not necessary or in the public interest, since
the potential public use may have an impact on the character of the area.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended to Council that:
1. Report No. PD 2005-036, Nick McDonald, Planning Consultant, re: Moon Point
Development Application, Part of Lots 15 and 16, Concession 3 (Orillia), Township of
Oro-Medonte, File No's: 2004-Sub-01, 2004-0PA-02 and 2004-ZBA-09 be received and
adopted;
2. That Official Plan Amendment No. 21 as set out in Attachment #4 to Report No. PD 2005-
036 be adopted;
3. That Zoning By-Law as set out in Attachment #5 to Report No. PD 2005-036 be passed;
4. That Draft Plan Approval to the lands proposed to be subdivided by the Moon Point
Corporation and application of the draft plan conditions as set out in Attachment #6 to
Report No. PD 2005-036 be granted;
5. And Further That cash-in-lieu of parkland as part of the subdivision approval process be
authorized.
~eCtfUIlY submitted,
<:pAt u-.i.!"r~
6ev- Nick MCDon~r R~P
Planning Consultant
C.A.O. Comments:
Date:~ Ib/O~
:J
./wn~
C.A.O.
v
Dept. Head
F:\PlANNING\D-Development &; Ptanning\D12 Subdivision Plans\2004.SUB.Ol, 2004-ZBA-09, 20D4-0PA.02 Moon Point Corporation\Report PO 2005-036 Moon Point
recommendation to PAC-doc
14
1--- ..
I
I
I
I
~ I -- ....~
~I .-,- ~
<l
Iii I
~: I
"
~I
~
!
L
~~
~a
~~
I
,
_",_-h_~~._-
B
~
~
o
OJ
~
5
g:
~
o
"
~
~
<
~ '"'~~
;;;ls8~~~
2~~~O~ 2
2:2t~5~ ~
~~€~~~ ~
~~~t;;~~:- ~
~~~:~: ~ ~
~~8~~B ~
~?:g~~g @
d:523:!!!::O ()
g~8~~2
"<
<
~
~ ~
"'i@<:;:
~ S ~ ~
o ::J Z I.;.
~ 3 ~ ~
5 ~ ~ ~
8 ~ 5 :?
'" '"' z 0
~ !l: ::'i ~
8 ~ t 2
: c;: ;:i I
;: g ~ 11
'.J 5 5:: ~
z <( ,.. ~
~ t; ~ ~
ci <oJ ~ f-
~ ~ ~ 2
~ tJ' ~ ~
~ :s g 0
:3 ~ ..i i
~ ~ g ~
_' ~ f3 2
,
~
]
.] ]
,
~ :;:
<'
; i ~
2 ~ ~
]:~n
:;,<o!:1.1t
HUH
5
:<iQ
'6~
,.
~.:l&
cj:;:ill i1
~f3@ ~
~~.~ ~
~i~ 2
Qi;iz :l
....;.<0 it
5
,
,
~
8
,
2
8
,
p
'" ~
~ ~
:'3 ~
~ ~
~ 2 ~
~ i ~
:-' ~ ,..
~ 0 ~
",;;:;rj
< '"
~ d '"
::J '" 8
i: !'!: C
!E ~ ~
~ ~ d
~ ..: f-
,.. 0 ;:i
Ie ~ :J
~ ~ ~
_'.0":
1! 1! 1
~ '" '" .2 1! ;!
~6~~~
,
<
~
.
,
"
<
c
~~z_J~~
~H~~~5
iii~i~-t
<
~ oll ~
~ ~ ~
~ g ~
; ~ ~ -":s
id ~Bg~
i~~d~~~
, '" '" ~ '" ~
"
1
/~
~
!~
~~
!
/
/
c',
-'::::.'
:=~i11
..
.] ..
.
[I . (.
.
. .. . ..
~[~; ..
..
.
. .]
I
iI
..,...;
,
~"'''__'''''''M_''''''''__''_'''/'<
,(
f
~:.
~ ~
~ ~ t2
~ ~ ~
z ~ ~
Q r :l
f-<"'
i f3 ~
'" (:i <{
0" "
~ ~ ~
i~ ~ ~
"" <( 0
~
, ..
"",
.
,~...,
: ")
..
I
'"
,-
F
9
c
z
~ ~
~ oJ
, .
z c
:;:;1:::
" c
i ~
~ ~
~ ~
IS i2
z 0
, ~
~ ~
< Z
~ 8
z.
<"
!ii:i
o v
" .."
~H
i1( BC
1 ~
~
~ l
d
~ i
,I
,II,
"' ~i"
~~~il
ifl'!ll:l
is II.!'
~ ,ll
-
CC
ro.O
- +-'
o..C
<I>
......+-'
Q.<1>
IDa:
06
C+:i
oCO
om
0>
......<1>
c::>
~l(A.iJ'
cQ.~~
oe
00..
~
.
"
lij~,",
n:2<l>
~ ~~
U)Ql~
~;~
€~'~
.g ,S$!:
~'j~
!:!"'-O
"iij"'<l>
"0 "
~~.*
"~ rn
_0
,-:0>0::
~~<ll
ffi~~
~r~
_d
~on
go ~
8,C.",
E"
~~ffi
",~<i
~I-E
~s;~
~:5~
~~-a
~~~
..2:2$5
..t;:::1il
11 g>g~
~iB8~
jj
if
o
E
!
oc
w
"
~I
o~ y
"R ~
o "
o rn
o ~
~':": i
; ij
. 0
oii ~
'\
\
\
'l;, \
\~
..~
~
Hnacltl1#/lrr ~...::::>
JUN. 2.2005 4:35PM
LSRCA
NO. 60
of~\J
Tel: 90S vS95w1281
1_800-465-0437
FoX' 905.853-5881
E..Ma.il: in{orAlluca.on..ca
Web: ,,-~'.lnc~.otl..~\'l
120 Bayvicn' P:u"icw2y
Box 2S2
Newm2.rket, Onnrio
I..3Y4X1
A
Watershed
for Life
F. -i ,4
SelIt by Facsimile 1-705-487-0133
June 2, 2005
File Nos.: 2004-SUB-01, 2004-0PA-02 & 2004-ZBA-09
1MS Nos.: PSDC114C24, POFC234, PZOC465
Mr Bruce Hoppe, Director of Planning
Township of Oro-Medonte
P.O. Box 100
010, ON LOL 2XO
Dear Mr Hoppe:
RE: Proposed Official Pla.n and Zoning By-law Amendments
Proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision
Columbus Club of Toronto
Part Lots 15 and 16, Concession 3
Townshipof OroMedonte
The staff of the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority (LSRCA) have reviewed the
Environmental Impact Statement & SWM and Namral Hazard Study Final Study Report
(Greenland Consulting Engineers and Watershed Management Ecology, May 2005) prepared to
address our comments May 3, 2005. Please note that only the main document has been revised.
The two appendices remain the same.
In preparing the Environmental Impact Study, the consultants contacted the LSRCA at the start
of the project in 2003 and we reviewed the tenus of reference for this project. The Study meets
the intent of our T crms ofRefcrcnce at that time, as well as our cmrent T em1;; of Reference. The
field survey program was scoped based on the site charactelisucs. The technical information
presented in the report is satisfactory.
We note that the concept plan illustrates woodland cover remaining on the lots in relatively large
contiguous blocks across the front of the lot. Twelve metre wide access points to the water are
illustrated on the plan and located to retain as namrally appearing shor"lim, as possible. The
report indicates that 62% vegetation coverage will remain. We recognize that the concept plan
is i1lustrativeand ",ill be refined through detail design through the subdivision conditions and
site plan approvaL
Based on the additional technical information provided, we do not consider this to be a
significant wildlife area based on breeding birds, as such, all potential natural heritage features
have noW been addressed through the EIS. As well, the concept plan illustrates development
outsidc the flood plain 3lld ero.ion prone areas. Therefore. we have no concerns with potential
impacts from natural hazards. The illustrated vegetation coverage will assist in providing the
anticipated stormwater quality control.
A number of the consultant's recommendations propose further work at the site plan control
stage. We rec01umeild that the Township require the following aspects to be addressed as part
of subdivision conditions as the design of the development should to be reviewed on a
comprehensive basis for the property rather than through future individual owners. Measures
to preserve the integrity ofthe shoreline and tree cover are acceptable providecl that the following
aspects are included.
Page I of4
SRCt;
NO. 60 'I
p 2; 4
"
sUN. 2 2005 L35PM
~~ -I ~
June 2, 2005
File Nos,: 2004cSUB-Ol, 2004.0PA-02 & 2004-ZBA-09
IMS Nos.: PSDCll4C24, POFC234, PZOC465
Mr Bruce Hoppe, Director of Planning
Township of OrocMedonte
Page 2 of 4
'"
1. A treepreser'iation plan and shoreline access plan be prepared by the developer. This
will ensure that development envelopes are located to maximize the woodlot coverage
in large coritiguousblocks. while accounting for engineering requirements witb lot
grading, water well and tile bed locations. Funher, the location of suitable access points
will take il1toconsideration shoreline vegelation as well as the location "rUle ephemeral
pools. Th.epreparation of these plans will require the expertise of a registered
professioI1alforesier (Rl'F)io identifY significant trees on the site worthy of protection.
Prior to preparation of these plans, the applicant should consult with LSRCA staff to
establish the criteria for identifying significant and specimen trees. We believe it is more
appropriate to recognize these species at the beginning of detail design.
2. We would riot recOn1Inend clearing of the water access areas by the developer, although
the general criteria for water aCCess needs to be defined by the developer. The future lot
owner should be given the opporrunity to leave the shoreline vegetation intact. Limited
shared access should be considered and is recommended by the LSRCA
3. We would recommend that if the replacement tile bed location is required in the future,
that an equivalent area be replanted ",'ith woody vegetation.
4. We also recommend that a Natural Envirorunent Stewardship Manual (refered to as
Homeovmer's Manual in tbe EIS) be prepared as a condition of draft plan approval and
be made available to prospective lot purchaser's. This manual wlll need to be prepared
by a qualified landscape architect.
We have no objection tothe Official Plan amendment provided that it includes the following:
1. Vegetation removal within tbe 20 metre water setback area shall be limited to provide
for viev.'ing, access to tbe shoreline and any shoreline structures. Removal of a minimum
number of trees to provide views of the water will be encouraged along with other less
invasl'le me3.sures such a.$ pruning_
2. Shoreline works may require a permit from the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation
Authority, Ministry of Natural Resources, or the Department of Fisheries and Oceans.
3. Everyeffortv.'illbe made to retain tree cover with this development. Measures such as
maximizihg the contiguous area of tree cover and rctaining shoreline vegetation, except
to provide water access or views, in the siting of development envelopes will be used.
Generally the site will be designed such that approximately 60% non-manicured
ve2etative cover will be retained.
... ... .
,
~)
2.2005 4: 35PM
LSRCA
NO. 61) i
4
~i - ll\
June 2, 2005
File Nos.: 2004-SlJB-OI, 2004-0PA-02 & 2004-ZBA-09
IMS Nos.: PSDCI14C24, POFC234, PZOC465
Mr Bruce Hoppe, Director of Planning
Tov'Inship ofOro-Medante
Page 3 of 4
We have nO objection to draft plan approval with the following conditions:
1. That this approval relates to a draft plan of subdivision prepared by Jones Consulting,
ualed April 5,2004.
2. Prior to final approval and to any grading tald11g place on Ule site, a Stormwater
Management Report incorporating Enhanced Protection (MOE, 2003) be prepared to the
satisfaction ofthe Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority. Provision must be made
to locate detention facilities above the elevation of the I: 1 00 year storm floodline if
applicable.
3. That a lot grading and drainage plan be prepared to the satisfaction of the Lake Simcoe
Region Conservation Authority.
4. That a report be prepared to the satisfaction of the AuthoritY detailing the means whereby
erosion and siltation will be minimized and contained on the site both during and
subsequent to the construction period.
5. That the owner agree in the subdivision agreement to maintain all erosion and siltation
control devices in good repair during the construction period in a manner satisfactory to
the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority.
6, That the owner obtain all necessary Authority permits.
7. That the owner prepare a tree preservation plan and shoreline access plan to the
satisfaction of the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority. The preparation of
these plans must include the expertise of a registered professional forester (RPF).
Development envelope limits, including building, septic system, driveway access,
shoreline access. and outdoor living space, will be defi.ned. Development envelopes will
alter approximately 40% of each lot, retaining approximately 60% in a non-manicured
vegetated state. Vegetation removal within the 20 metre water setback area will be a
maximum of 12 metres of shoreline length for each lot.
8. That the o'wner prepare a Natural Environment Stewardship Manual for prospective
pun::hascrs that will educate the landov''l1er on the value of the woodlands and ephemeral
pools as part ofthe Lake Simcoe watershed, as well as suggestions to maintain the health
of the ecosysteIll. This would cOVe! such aspects, but not be limited to, the value of
native vegetation, control of nuisance plant and animal species, identify appropriate
species for restoration or en..\ancement plantu1g' s suitable to the area, and limiting
pesticide, herbicide, and fertilizer use. The manual will be prepared to the satisfaction
of the Lalce Simcoe Region Conservation Authority.
.
.
N 2.2005 4:35PM
LS ,L
NO. 601
r. 4/4
C\..C '
\\~L...D
June 2, 2005
File Nos.: 2004-SOO-Ol, 2004-0PA-02 & 2004-ZBA-09
IMS Nos.: PSDCI14C24, POFC234, PZOC465
Mr Bnlce Hoppe. Director of Planning
Township ofOro-Medonte
Page 4 of 4
9. That the subdivision agreement include requirements in the Notice of Offers of purchase
and Sale for prospective purchasers to the satisfaction of the Lake Simcoe Region
Conservation Authority:
a) water access and views of Lake Simcoe are restricted through the Zoning By-law,
tree preserVation plari,arid sh()reliIleaccess platl.
b) a Natural Environment Stewardship Manual as prepared under condition 8 will
be provided to the prospective purchaser.
c) that pennits may be required from the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation
Authority, MinistrY ofNatural Resources or Department of Fisheries and Oceans
for shoreline works.
We hove no objection to approval of the zoning by-law amendment with the following
provisions included:
1.
TIle Township Zoning By-law retain 0 minimum development setback of20 metres from
the shoreline. This would include buildings and structures including septic systems, but
excluding docks, boathouses and other shoreline related strUctures.
2.
A maximum of 12 metres mav be used for shoreline related structures and access.
. .
Please contact me if you have any questions. Please reference the above file numbers ill future
correspondence.
Yours truly,
~:i,RPP
Scroor Plonner
JW/ph
c. Kevin Anderson, The Tay Jak Group, 1-905-665-2031 - Fax
Jim Hartman, Greenland International Consulting Ltd., 1-705-444-5482 - Fax
Geza Ga..opardy, Watershed Management. Ecology - 1-416-850-5181 - Fax
S:IJ::mct\V\L.etten;\&ub.01'omtdonte,moon point 4.\\1'd
"" 'J ,>
/#/ach rr;V11 tHY
~-1\
OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 21
(MOON POINT CORPORATION)
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
Township Application # 2004-0PA-02
Prepared by
MERIDIAN
.....-M~~!NG
Township Planning Consultants
June 6, 2005
.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CONSTITUTIONAL STATEMENT
PART I:
1.0
2.0
3.0
PART II
PART III
Appendix 1:
PURPOSE
LOCATION
BASIS
THE INTRODUCTION
THE AMENDMENT
THE APPENDICES
Planning Report prepared by Meridian Planning Consultants
(Township Planning consultant)
CV~ -2 'L
2
3
3
3
3
5
6
~~_2~
BY-LAW
The Corporation of the
Township of Oro-Medonte
Being a By-law to Adopt
Amendment No. 21 to the Official Plan
WHEREAS The Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte is empowered to Amend its Official
Plan as required;
AND WHEREAS the process for considering such an Amendment was in accordance with
Section 17 and 21 of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990 c.P 13.
AND WHEREAS the amendments to the Official Plan are deemed to be appropriate and in the
public interest:
NOW THEREFORE it is resolved that:
1.
Amendment number 21 to the Official Plan, attached hereto, is hereby adopted
and;
2.
This by-law shall come into force and take effect as specified in the Planning Act
R.S.O. 1990, c.P. 13
Read a first and second time on the _day of June, 2005
Read a third time and finally passed this _ day of June, 2005
Mayor
Clerk
Official Plan Amendment 21
(Moon Point Corporation Application)
Township of Oro-Medonte
Prepared by
MERIDIAN
IIlo>>INM~IN(:;.
Page 1
June 6, 2005
Oif -, L,
f\: -L I
CONSTITUTIONAL STATEMENT
Part I: The Introduction, provides general information regarding the general policy
update. Part I: The Introduction does not constitute an operative part of
Amendment No. 21 to the Official Plan.
Part II: The Amendment, provides the details of the Official Plan Amendment. Part
II: The Amendment, including Schedule A constitute the operative part of
Amendment No. 21 to the Official Plan.
Part III: The Appendices, provide more specific information regarding the Amendment
and the background work that led to the preparation of the Amendment. Part III:
The Appendices do not constitute an operative part of Amendment No. 21 to the
Official Plan.
Official Plan Amendment 21
(Moon Point Corporation Application)
Township of Oro-Medonte
Prepared by
MERIDIAN
.........~CO"olII'J~nlJ<<;.
Page 2
June 6, 2005
~{ -, 25
PART I: THE INTRODUCTION
(this is not an operative part of Official Plan Amendment No. 21)
1.0 PURPOSE
The purpose of this Amendment is to change the land use designation applying to a parcel of
land along the Lake Simcoe shoreline to provide for the development of a 14 lot Plan of
Subdivision.
2.0 LOCATION
The Amendment applies to lands within Part of Lots 15 and 16 in Concession 3 of the former
Township of Orillia, now in the Township of Oro-Medonte, as shown on Schedule 'A', which is
attached to this Amendment.
3.0 BASIS
A Comprehensive Planning Report with attachments is attached to this Amendment as Appendix
'A'. The Planning Report reviews the application in detail and its conformity with the Township of
Oro-Medonte Official Plan.
Section D10.3.8 of the in effect Official Plan contains a policy that is intended to be considered
when applications for shoreline development are submitted. This policy is reproduced below:
'The further expansion of the shoreline development area onto lands that are not
designated Shoreline is not permitted by this Plan. Exceptions may be granted through
the approval of an Official Plan Amendment if the expansion is small in scate, and is
either focused on the shoreline or is considered to be infilling. Infilling is defined as
development that abuts a developed area on two sides and/or is located within a parcel
of land that abuts public roads on at least three sides. The creation of strip development
across from existing development on existing public roads is not contemplated by this
Plan.
Council may consider such minor amendments to the Official Plan to redesignate lands
for such limited shoreline development, provided Council is satisfied that:
a) The lots wilt have a minimum area of 0.6 hectares to a maximum area of
approximately 1.0 hectare, except where larger sizes may be suitable because of
environmental constraints or design considerations;
b) The majority of the existing tree cover on the proposed lots is retained and
protected as part of the approvals process;
c) The development s compatible, in terms of scale, density and character, with
existing development;
Official Plan Amendment 21
(Moon Point Corporation Application)
Township of Oro-Medonte
Prepared by
MERIDIAN
~I"IGC()toeJ~ftlNe
Page 3
June 6, 2005
~ ~2b
.
d) The proposed lots, if located on the shoreline, have a water frontage of no less
than 45 metres; and,
e) The lots would conform to the general subdivision and consent policies of this
Plan.
For Plans of Subdivision that involve the creation of lots with water frontage, only a single
tier of lots shall be created, all with water frontage as set out in Section 010.3.6 of this
Plan. In addition, no new lots with direct access to County Roads are permitted.
If major development is proposed (which is defined as development that does not meet
the above criteria), a detailed review of the entire shoreline area shall be carried out to
determine if the proposed location is suitable and appropriate from a growth management
perspective. "
The Amendment to the Official Plan will conform to the policy set out in Section D10.3.8 in every
respect. Specifically:
. Each of the proposed lots will have an area of 0.6 hectares or greater;
. The majority of the existing tree cover on the proposed lots will be retained and
provisions will be included in both the Subdivision Agreement and the individual Site Plan
Agreements applying to each lot to ensure that the majority of forest cover is maintained;
. The proposed development, as a result of its location and large lot sizes, is compatible in
terms of scale, density and character with existing development;
. Each of the proposed lots will have a water frontage of no less than 45 metres; and,
. The general criteria in the Official Plan respecting subdivisions are met.
Council has also had careful regard to the environmental impact of the proposed development.
The Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority, who is responsible for providing objective
advice to the Township on environmental planning matters, has confirmed that the site does not
support significant natural features and has recommended that development can proceed
provided certain conditions are satisfied. These conditions will be included in the implementing
documents. The Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority letter is attached to the Planning
Report in Appendix 'A'.
Official Plan Amendment 21
(Moon Point Corporation Application)
Township of Oro-Medonte
Prepared by
MERIDIAN
__Cl:lIIeJ~nll'C
Page 4
June 6, 2005
~~
.
PART II: THE AMENDMENT
(This is the operative part of Official Plan Amendment No. 21)
ITEM # 1
Section D10 of the Official Plan is amended by adding in a new Section D1 0.9 as set out below:
"D10.9
EXCEPTIONS
D10.9.1
Part of Lots 15 and 16, Concession 3 (Orillia)
Notwithstanding any other policy in this Plan, the following policies apply to the
lands shown as being subject to this Section on Schedule '_' to this Plan:
a) No more than 14 lots by way of Plan of Subdivision shall be developed.
b) The Subdivision Agreement shall contain provisions that require the
preparation of detailed site plans for each lot. The intent of the site plans
is to insure that the majority of the tree cover within the 20 metre setback
area from Lake Simcoe and on the remainder of each lot is maintained
as development occurs. These site plans are to be approved by the
Township and the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority as part of
the approval process.
c) In order to ensure that individual lot owners and future lot owners are
aware of the site planning process, each of the 14 lots shall be subject to
Site Plan Control pursuant to the Planning Act. These Site Plan
Agreements shall include appropriate provisions that provide for
maximum tree retention on the property.
Official Plan Amendment 21
(Moon Point Corporation Application)
Township of Oro-Medonte
Prepared by
MERIDIAN
~M~~ltC
Page 5
June 6, 2005
.
PART III: THE APPENDICES
Appendix 1
Planning Report prepared by Meridian Planning Consultants (Township Planning
Consultant)
Official Plan Amendment 21
(Moon Point Corporation Application)
Township of Oro-Medonte
Prepared by
MERIDIAN
_t&lC~llI"NnlJ<,
Page 6
June 6, 2005
q,-28
/lflacAm,Pf"/r >75
~f~2 ~
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
BY-LAW NO. 2005-_
Being a By-law to amend By-law 97-95 to change the zoning of lands owned
by the Moon Point Corporation in Part of Lots 15 and 16, Concession 3
(Orillia)
WHEREAS it is deemed expedient by Council to amend By-law 97-95 to implement Official Plan
Amendment No. 21 to permit a 14 lot Plan of Subdivision.
NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte enacts as
follows:
1. Schedule 'A8' is hereby amended as set out on Schedule 'A-1' to this By-law.
2. Section 7.0 (Exceptions) is hereby amended by adding the following sub-section:
"7.162 Notwithstanding any other provision in this By-law, the following provisions apply
to the lands denoted by the symbol "162 on the schedules to this By-law:
a) A maximum of 14 lots are permitted.
b) The minimum lot frontage is 21.8 metres.
c) The maximum width of an access/view corridor extending from the
shoreline to the 20 metre setback line from the average high water mark
is 12 metres.
3. The Holding provision shall only be lifted once a Site Plan Agreement has been entered
into.
Read a First and Second time on
Read a Third and Final time on
Mayor
Clerk
Applicant: Moon Point Corporation
File No.: 2004-Sub-0]
Municipality: Township of Oro-Medonte
Subject Lands: Concession 3, Part of Lots ]5 & ]6 (Orillia)
HI;tce}rYlM tf q 0:;
~ ":j ()
Date of Decision: June 22, 2005
Date of Notice: --- --, 2005
Last Date of Appeal: --- --, 2005
The Township's conditions and amendments to final plan approval for registration of this
subdivision are as follows:
No. Conditions
1. That this draft plan approval applies to the draft plan prepared by Jones Consulting dated April 2,
2005, showing 14 lots in Part of Lots 15 and 16, Concession 3 in the former City of Orillia, now the
Township of Oro-Mcdonte.
2. That 0.3 metre reserves be included on the final Plan of Subdivision along Street 'A', which shall be
conveyed to the Township of Oro-Medonte without monetary eonsideration and free of all
encumbranees.
3. That the Owner agrees that the road allowance shown as Street 'A' on the draft plan shall be built,
dedicated as a publie highway and named to the satisfaetion of the Township ofOro-Medonte.
4. That the Owner enter into a Subdivision Agreement with the municipality, agreeing to satisfy all
eonditions, finaneial and otherwise, of the Township of Oro-Medonte.
5. That the Owner agree to either dedicate to the Township at least 5% of the land to be subdivided as
publie parkland or pay cash-in-lieu of parkland to the satisfaction ofCouneil.
6. That prior to any site alteration or final approval, a plan or plans shall be prepared to the satisfaetion
of the Township Engineer and the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority showing:
a. stormwater management measures;
b. general lot grading including existing and proposed elevations;
c. building envelopes;
d. septic system loeations;
e. driveway locations;
f. erosion eontrol measures;
g. site servicing including water, hydro, telephone, eable TV, and gas serviees; as well as mainline
utilities and appurtenanees in the road allowanee; and,
h. areas where existing vegetation is to be retained.
These approved plan(s) will form part of the Subdivision Agreement with the Township of Oro-
Medonte.
7. That the Owner prepare site plans for eaeh lot depicting the information preseribed in Condition 6
as required.
8. That the Owner undertake soil suitability testing on lands proposed for private septie systems to the
satisfaction of the Township ofOro-Medonte.
C\tc--5l
Applicant: Moon Point Corporation
File No.: 2004-Sub-Ol
Municipality: Township of Oro-Medonte
Subject Lands: Concession 3, Part of Lots]5 & ]6 (Orillia)
Date of Decision: Jnne 22, 2005
Date of Notice: --- --, 2005
Last Date of Appeal: _n --, 2005
9. That prior to final approval, the appropriate zoning shal] be in effect for this subdivision, in
accordance with the provisions of the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c. P. 13. Such zoning shal]
include a holding provision that shal] not be lifted by Council until an appropriate Site Plan
Agreement pursuant to Scction 41 of the Planning Act has been entered into between the Township
of Oro-Medonte and the owner of the lot for which a building permit is requested.
10. That such easements as may be required for utility or drainage purposes shal] be granted to the
appropriate authority.
] ]. That the Subdivision Agreement contain a clause to the effect that individual lot owners wil] be
required to obtain the services of a professional engineer registered with the Association of
Professional Engineers of Ontario experienced in private sewage system design to prepare a detailed
site development plan for approval by thc Township Engineer prior to the issuance of a Sewage
System Permit. This site plan wil] be in conformity with the plan or plans described above, and will
contain the fol]owing:
a) The location of al] buildings and structures existing or proposed on the lot.
b) The location, size and header invert elevation of the sewage system including existing and
proposed finished grades.
c) Drainage control measures.
12. That the Subdivision Agreement contain a clause to the effect that individual lot owners will be
required to enter into a Site Plan Agreement with the Township ofOro-Medonte pursuant to Section
4] of the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990 c.P.13 before a building permit can be issued. The Site Plan
Agreement shal] deal with the items listed in Conditions 6, ]9,24,29 and 30.
13. That the Subdivision Agreement contain the fol]owing clause:
"The Owner shall include in all offers of Purchase and Sale a clause advising perspective
purchasers that a Site Plan Agreement between individual lot owners and the Township of 01'0-
Medonte pursuant to Section 4] of the Planning Act, R.S.O. ]990 c.P 13 is required before a
building permit can be issued for the lot. "
]4. That the Owner shall agree in the Subdivision Agreement, in wording acceptable to the Township
Engineer, to ensure that all storm water management facilities and sediment and erosion control
measures will be in place prior to any site alteration.
15. That the Owner shall agree in the Subdivision Agreement to engage a qualified professional to
certify in writing that the works referred to in Item ] 4 were constructed in accordance with the
plans, reports and specifications, as approved by the Township Engineer.
] 6. That the Subdivision Agreement contain the following clause to the satisfaction of the Simcoe
Muskoka Catholic District Schoo] Board:
Of-'~ L
Applicant: Moon Point Corporation
File No.: 2004-Sub-0]
Municipality: Township of Oro-Medonte
Subject Lands: Concession 3, Part of Lots ]5 & ]6 (Orillia)
Date of Decision: June 22, 2005
Date of Notice: ---..,2005
Last Date of Appeal: m --, 2005
"The owner shall include in all offers of purchase and sale a clause advising prospective
purchasers that pupils ii-om this development attending educational facilities operated
by the Simcoe Muskoka Catholic District School Board may, be transported
to/accommodated in temporQlY facilities out of the neighbourhood school's area. "
17. That the Subdivision Agreement contain the following clause to the satisfaction of the Simcoe
County District School Board:
"Purchasers, renters, lessees are warned that there are no schools planned within this
subdivision, or within walking distance of it and that pupils may be accommodated in
temporary facilities and or be directed tofacilities outside of the area."
18. That the Owner agree in the Subdivision Agreement to make satisfactory arrangements for the
construction of a mail facility, if required, to the satisfaction of the Township of Oro-Medonte with
confirmation rcceived from Canada Post.
19. That the Owncr ensure in the final grading plan that a common drainage swale system is designed at
the lakeside of the septic systems and primarily along the 20 metre shoreline setback limit. To
minimize impacts on the moisture regime, pervious connections from the drainage swale along the
20 metre setback at the ponding area locations will be required to ensure some level of waterflow to
these areas.
20. That the Owner agree to include provisions within the Subdivision Agreement which states the
following:
"Purchasers are notified that there were no permissions at the time this subdivision plan was
registeredfor the construction of docks on the property. All works along the shoreline require the
approval of the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority and/or the Ministry of Natural
Resources and/or the Department of Fisheries and Oceans. "
2 I. That the Owner secure appropriate authorization from the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation
Authority or other agency as appropriate pursuant to the Fisheries Act for the outfall design and
construction to eliminate or mitigate Harmful Alteration, Disruption or Destruction offish habitat.
22. That the Owner agree in the Subdivision Agreement that construction activities on the site are to be
carried out in accordance with the Migratory Bird Convention Act.
23. That the Owner agree in the Subdivision Agreement to satisfy the Township of Oro-Medonte with
respect to lot numbering and to display the lot number and corresponding municipal address in a
prominent location on each lot.
24. That the Owner agree in the Subdivision Agreement to permanently stake the limits of the 20 metre
setback from Lake Simcoe to the satisfaction of the Township ofOro-Medonte.
or"...,
T<;--) )
Applicant: Moon Point Corporation
File No.: 2004-Sub-0]
Municipality: Township of Oro-Medonte
Subject Lands: Concession 3, Part of Lots ]5 &]6 (Orillia)
Date of Decision: June 22, 2005
Date of Notice: --- --, 2005
Last Date of Appeal: --- --, 2005
25. Prior to final approval and to any grading taking place on the site, a stormwater management report
incorporating enhanced protection (MOE 2003) be prepared to the satisfaction of the Lake Simcoe
Region Conservation Authority. Provision must be made to locate detention facilities above the
elevation of the I: I 00 year storm flood line if applicable and if required.
26. That a report be prepared to the satisfaction of the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority
detailing the means whereby erosion and siltation will be minimized and contained on the site both
during and subsequent to the construction period.
27. That the Owner agree in the Subdivision Agreement to maintain all erosion and siltation control
devices in good repair in a manner satisfactory to the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority.
28. That the Owner agree in the Subdivision Agreement to obtain all necessary Lake Simcoe Region
Conservation Authority permits.
29. That the Owner prepare a Tree Preservation and Shoreline Access Plan to the satisfaction of the
Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority and the Township of Oro-Medonte. The preparation
of these plans must include the expertise of a registered professional forester. Development
envelope limits, including, septic system, driveway access, shoreline access and outdoor living
space will be defined and assessed. Development envelopes will alter approximately 40% of each
lot, retaining approximately 60% in a non-manicured vegetated state. Vegetation removal within
the 20 metre setback area from the shoreline will be a maximum of 12 metres of shoreline width for
each lot.
30. That the Owner prepare a Natural Environment Stewardship Manual for prospective purchasers that
will educate the landowner on the value of the woodlands and ephemeral pools as part of the Lake
Simcoe watershed as well as suggestions to maintain the health of the eco-system. This would
cover such aspects, but not be limited to, the value of native vegetation, control of nuisance plant
and animal species, the identification of appropriate species for restoration or enhancement
plantings suitable to the area, and limiting pesticide, herbicide and fertilizer use. The manual will
be prepared to the satisfaction of both the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority and the
Township ofOro-Medonte.
3 I. That the Owner agree in the Subdivision Agreement to include requirements in the Notice of Offers
of Purchase and Sale for prospective purchasers to the satisfaction of the Lake Simcoe Region
Conservation Authority and the Township ofOro-Medonte that indicate that:
a. Water access and views of Lake Simcoe are restricted through the Zoning By-law, Tree
Preservation Plan and Shoreline Access Plan;
b. A Natural Heritage Stewardship Manual as prepared under Condi"tion 30 will be provided to the
perspective purchaser; and,
c. That permits will be required from the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority, Ministry
of Natural Resources and/or Department of Fisheries and Oceans for shoreline works.
~ - 3Y
Applicant: Moon Point Corporation
File No.: 2004-Sub-0]
Municipality: Township of Oro-Medonte
Subject Lands: Concession 3, Part of Lots ]5 & ]6 (Orillia)
Date of Decision: June 22, 2005
Date of Notice: --- --, 2005
Last Date of Appeal: m --, 2005
32. That an appropriate number of test wells be drilled on the site to demonstrate the quality and
quantity of water available to the proposed lots.
33. That an evaluation of individual private sewage disposal options be carried out to the satisfaction of
the Township ofOro-Medonte. The intent of the review would be to identify which private sewage
disposal option is the most appropriate in terms of:
. Land area required;
. Ability to treat nitrate; and
. Ability to reduce the amount of phosphorous produced.
34. That the Owner carries out an appropriate archaeological assessment to the satisfaction of the
Ministry of Citizenship, Culture and Recreation.
35. That the Owner prepare a sample site plan and agreement for each lot to the satisfaction of the
Township ofOro-Medonte.
36. That prior to the final approval of this plan, the Township is advised in writing by the Simcoe
Muskoka Catholic Separate Sehool Board how Condition 16 has been satisfied.
37. That prior to the final approval of this plan, the Township is advised in writing by the Simcoe
County District School Board how Condition 17 has been satisfied.
38. That prior to the final approval of this plan, the Township is advised in writing by the Lake Simcoe
Region Conservation Authority how Conditions 6, 21, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 and 31 have been
satisfied.
39. That prior to the final approval of this plan, the Township is advised in writing by the Ministry of
Citizenship, Culture and Recreation how Condition 34 has been satisfied.
NOTES TO DRAFT APPROVAL
1. It is the applicant's responsibility to fulfil the conditions of Couneil's approval and to ensure that the
required clearanee letters are forwarded by the appropriate ageneies to the Township of Oro-
Medonte, Planning Department, Administration Centre, 148 Line 7 South, Box 100, Oro, ON LOL
2XO, quoting Township file number 2004-sub-01.
2. The Land Titles Act requires all new plans be registered in a Land Titles system if the land is
situated in a land titles division and there are certain exeeptions.
3. The Township of Oro-Medonte uses a 0.3 metre reserve to notify the publie that aeeess to the
Municipal highway will not be granted aeross the reserve. 1t should be shown as a bloek on the
final plan outside the road allowanee. Deeds in triplicate eonveying this reserve to the Corporation
of the Township of Oro-Medonte together with the proposed final plan should be sent to the
munieipal Clerk.
Q[ -,:.::,
- \\-:"'" <" -"
Applicant: Moon Point Corporation
File No.: 2004-Sub-0]
Municipality: Township of Oro-Medonte
Subject Lands: Concession 3, Part of Lots]5 & ]6 (Orillia)
Date of Decision: June 22, 2005
Date of Notice: ---..,2005
Last Date of Appeal: --- --,2005
4. Inauguration, or extension of a piped water supply, or a storm drainage system, is subject to the
approval of the Ministry of Environment under scctions 23 and 24 of the Ontario Water Resources
Act, R.S.O. 1980.
5. Hydro One wishes to advise the developer of the following:
(a) the costs of any relocations or revisions to Hydro Onc facilities which are necessary to
accommodate this subdivision will be borne by thc developcr
(b) any easement rights of Hydro One are to be respected
(c) the developer should contact the local Hydro One Area Officc to verify if any low voltage
distribution lines may be affected by the proposal
6. The final plan approved by the Township must be registered within 30 days or the Township may
withdraw the approval under Section 51 (59) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990
7. All measurements in the subdivision final plan must be presented in metric units.
8. Clearances are required from the following agencies:
Corporation of the Township ofOro-Medonte
Box 100
Oro Station, Ontario
LOL2XO
Simcoe County District School Board
1170 Highway 26
Midhurst,ON
LOL IXO
Simcoe Muskoka Catholic District School Board
46 Alliance Blvd.
Barrie,ON
L4M 5K3
Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority
120 Bayview Parkway
Box 282
Newmarket, Ontario
L3Y 4XI
Ministry of Culture
400 University Ave. 4th Floor
Toronto, ON M7A 2R9
~/
CW' 5b
.
Applicant: Moon Point Corporation
File No.: 2004-Sub-0]
Municipality: Township of Oro-Medonte
Subject Lands: Concession 3, Part of Lots]5 & ]6 (Orillia)
Date of Decision: June 22, 2005
Date of Notice: --- --, 2005
Last Date of Appeal: --- --, 2005
If the agency conditions concern conditions in the Subdivision Agreement, a copy of the relevant
section of the agreement should be sent to them. This will expcdite clearancc of the final plan.
9. If final approval is not given to this plan within three years of the draft approval date, and no
extensions have been granted, draft approval shall lapse under subsection 5 I (32) of the Planning
Act, R.S.O. 1990, as amended. If the Owner wishes to request and extension to draft approval. a
written explanation, must be received by the Township ofOro-Medonte Prior to the lapsing date.
Please notc that an updated review of the plan, and revisions to the conditions of approval, may be
necessary if an extension is to be granted.
1 O. When the Zoning By-law is being prepared, reference to this subdivision application OM-file
number should be included in the explanatory note. This will expedite the Township's and other
agencies' consideration of the by-law.
-(
Committee of Adiustment Minutes
Thursdav June 16. 2005. 9:30 a.m.
In Attendance: Chairman Allan Johnson, Member Dave Edwards, Member
Michelle Lynch, Member Garry Potter, Member Lynda Aiken and Secretary-
Treasurer Andy Karaiskakis.
1. Communications and Correspondence
-May 2005 OACA Newsletter
Moved by Michelle Lynch, seconded by Lynda Aiken
That the Ontario Association of Committees of Adjustments Newsletter of
May 2005 be received.
2. Disclosure of Pecuniary Interest
None declared
3. Hearinqs:
9:30
Paul Hutchinson & Joyce Fletcher
Concession 11, Plan 232, Lot 11 (Oro)
294 Line 11 South
2005-A-15
In Attendance: No one
BE IT RESOLVED that:
Moved by Dave Edwards, seconded by Michelle Lynch
"That the Committee hereby approve minor variance application 2005-A-15 as
follows:
THAT PERMISSION TO EXPAND A LEGAL NON-COMPLYING
STRUCTURE IS GRANTED FOR 294 LINE 11 SOUTH FOR A 23 M2
(247.5 FT2) HALF STOREY SECOND FLOOR ADDITION ONTO AN
EXISTING DWELLING AND FOR A 11.2 m2 (120 ft2) VERANDAH/DECK
TO BE LOCATED AT THE REAR OF THE DWELLING
and subject to the following conditions:
1. That the setbacks be in conformity with the dimensions as set out in the
application and on the sketch submitted and approved by the Committee;
Committee of Adjustment-June 16, 2005
Page 1
1&) ~~,
2. That an Ontario Land Surveyor provide verification to the Township of
compliance with the Committee's decision by 1) pinning the footing and 2)
verifying in writing prior to pouring of the foundation by way of survey/real
property report so that the proposed addition be no closer than 1.08 m
(3.54 It) from the interior side lot line for the northwest corner of the
dwelling and no closer than 1.17 m (3.83 ft) for the northeast corner of the
dwelling; and,
3. That the appropriate building permit be obtained from the Township's Chief
Building Official only after the Committee's decision becomes final and
binding, as provided for within the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P. 13.
.. ...Carried."
Committee of Adjustment-June 16, 2005
Page 2
)-
!
J
9:40
Karl & Anne Locke
Conc.14, Plan M205, Lot 7 (Oro)
14 Petherwin Place
2004-A-02
In Attendance: Karl Locke, applicant
Secretary-Treasurer read letter from Tim Salkeld, Resource Planner,
Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority, dated June 9, 2005 verbatim to
the Committee members and those present in the audience.
BE IT RESOLVED that
Moved by Lynda Aiken, seconded by Dave Edwards
"That the Committee hereby approve Minor Variance Application 2004-A-02
subject to the following conditions:
1. That the appropriate building permit be obtained from the Township's
Chief Building Official only after the Committee's decision becomes final
and binding, as provided for within the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P. 13;
2. That an Ontario Land Surveyor provide verification to the Township of
compliance with the Committee's decision by 1) pinning the footing and 2)
verifying in writing prior to pouring of the foundation by way of survey/real
property report prepared by an Ontario Land Surveyor that the new
dwelling be 0 metres from the Environmental Protection Boundary Zone;
3. That the applicant enter into a Site Plan Control with the Township to
ensure that the appropriate enhancement or restoration works are
completed to the satisfaction of the Township and the Nottawasaga Valley
Conservation Authority;
4. That the septic system be installed to required setbacks of Part 8 of the
Ontario Building Code, and,
5. That the setbacks be in conformity with the dimensions as set out in the
application and by the sketch submitted with the application and approved
by the Committee.
.....Carried."
Committee of Adjustment-June 16, 2005
Page 3
)
9:50
Ken & Angelina Bowman
Conc. 10, South Part Lot 6 (Medonte)
612 Warminster Sideroad
2005-A-18
In Attendance: Ken & Angelina Bowman, applicants
Secretary-Treasurer read letter from Tim Salkeld, Resource Planner,
Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority, dated June 14, 2005 verbatim
to the Committee members and those present in the audience.
BE IT RESOLVED that
Moved by Michelle Lynch, seconded by Lynda Aiken
"That the Committee hereby approve minor variance application 2005-A-18 as
follows:
THAT PERMISSION TO EXPAND TWO NON-CONFORMING
STRUCTURES IS GRANTED FOR 612 WARMINSTER SIDEROAD FOR
A 27.871 M2 (300 FT2) ONE STOREY BASEMENT ADDITION ON THE
NORTH SIDE OF THE EXISTING DWELLING AND FOR AN
INCREASED HEIGHT FOR THE DETACHED GARAGE TO 4.877 M (16
FT)
and subject to the following conditions:
1. That the appropriate building permit be obtained from the Township's
Chief Building Official only after the Committee's decision becomes final
and binding, as provided for within the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P. 13;
2. That an Ontario Land Surveyor provide verification to the Township of
compliance with the Committee's decision by 1) pinning the footing and 2)
verifying in writing prior to pouring of the foundation by way of survey/real
property report that the proposed addition be no closer than 5.8 metres
(19 feet) from the interior side lot line;
3. That the height of the detached garage does not exceed 4.877 metres (16
feet); and,
4. That the setbacks be in conformity with the dimensions as set out in the
application and on the site plan submitted with the application and approved
by the Committee.
.. ...Carried."
Committee of Adjustment.June 16, 2005
Page 4
)-
10:00
Viola Tuck
Conc. 1, South Part Lot 16 (Oro)
861 Penetanguishene Road
2005-B-19
In Attendance: Mr. Charles Style, solicitor for the applicant, Ms. Viola Tuck,
applicant
BE IT RESOLVED that:
Moved by Dave Edwards, seconded by Michelle Lynch
"That the Committee hereby Grant Provisional Consent regarding Application
2005-B-19 subject to the following conditions:
1. That three copies of a Reference Plan for the subject land indicating the
severed parcel be prepared by an Ontario Land Surveyor be submitted to
the Secretary-Treasurer;
2. That the applicant's solicitor prepare and submit a copy of the proposed
conveyance for the parcel severed, for review by the Municipality;
3. That the severed lands be merged in title with 2610 Ski Trails Road and
that the provisions of Subsection 3 or 5 of Section 50 of The Planning Act
apply to any subsequent conveyance or transaction involving the subject
lands;
4. That the applicants solicitor provide an undertaking that the severed lands
and the lands to be enhanced will merge in title;
5. That the applicant apply for and obtain a re-zoning on the severed land to
accurately reflect the residential land use;
6. That all municipal taxes be paid to the Township of Oro-Medonte; and,
7. That the conditions of consent imposed by the Committee be fulfilled
within one year from the date of the giving of the notice.
.....Carried."
Committee of Adjustment-June 16, 2005
Page 5
10:10
Viola Tuck
Conc. 1, South Part Lot 16 (Oro)
861 Penetanguishene Road
1ij)-h
2005-B-09
In Attendance: Mr. Charles Style, solicitor for the applicant, Ms. Viola Tuck,
applicant
Secretary-Treasurer read letter from Gerry Churchill, 2204 Ski Trails Road,
dated June 15, 2005 verbatim to the Committee members and those
present in the audience.
BE IT RESOLVED that
Moved by Lynda Aiken, seconded by Michelle Lynch
"That the Committee hereby Grant Provisional Consent for Application 2005-B-
09 subject to the following list of conditions:
1. That three copies of a Reference Plan for the subject lands indicating the
severed parcel be prepared by an Ontario Land Surveyor be submitted to
the Secretary-Treasurer;
2. That the applicants' solicitor prepare and submit a copy of the proposed
conveyance for the parcel severed, for review by the Municipality;
3. That all municipal taxes be paid to the Township of Oro-Medonte;
4. That the applicant apply for and obtain a re-zoning on the severed land to
accurately reflect the residential land use;
5. That the applicant pay a Development Charges Fee in the amount of
$4,055.78 (By-law 2004-082) to the Township;
6. That the applicant pay $ 2000.00 for the lot created as cash-in-Iieu of a
parkland contribution; and,
7. That the conditions of consent imposed by the Committee be fulfilled
within one year from the date of the giving of the notice.
.....Carried."
Committee of Adjustment-June 16, 2005
Page 6
10:20
Bruce Maguire
Plan 629, Lots 4 & 5 (Oro)
9 Nelson Street
2005-A-19
In Attendance: Mr. Rod Young, architect, and Mr. Bruce Maguire, applicant
Secretary-Treasurer read letter from Tim Salkeld, Resource Planner,
Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority, dated June 14, 2005 verbatim
to the Committee members and those present in the audience.
BE IT RESOLVED that
Moved by Garry Potter, seconded by Dave Edwards
"That the Committee hereby approve minor variance application 2005-A-19 as
follows:
THAT PERMISSION TO EXPAND A NON-CONFORMING STRUCTURE
IS GRANTED FOR 9 NELSON STREET FOR A 52.5 M2 (565 FT2) ONE
STOREY ADDITION ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE EXISTING
DWELLING
and subject to the following conditions:
1. That the appropriate building permit be obtained from the Township's
Chief Building Official only after the Committee's decision becomes final
and binding, as provided for within the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P. 13;
2. That an Ontario Land Surveyor provide verification to the Township of
compliance with the Committee's decision by 1) pinning the footing and 2)
verifying in writing prior to pouring of the foundation by way of survey/real
property report that the proposed addition be no closer than 7.8 metres
(25.6 feet) from the average high water mark of Bass Lake; and,
3. That the setbacks be in conformity with the dimensions as set out in the
application and on the site plan submitted with the application approved by
the Committee
4. Applicant to verify that the sewage system meets the minimum required
setbacks as per Part 8 of the Ontario Building Code.
.. ...Carried."
Committee of Adjustment-June 16, 2005
Page 7
10:30
Susanne Rickard Cole In Trust
Plan 918, Lots 4 & 5 (Oro)
310 Shanty Bay Road
?a
1.,}
(I
v
2005-A-20
In Attendance: Mr. Eric Cole, representing applicant
BE IT RESOLVED that:
Moved by Garry Potter, seconded by Lynda Aiken
"That the Committee hereby approve minor variance application 2005-A-20 as
follows:
THAT PERMISSION TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED SIDE YARD
SETBACK IS GRANTED FOR 310 SHANTY BAY ROAD FOR A 111.48
M2 (1,200 FT2) DETACHED GARAGE
and subject to the following condition:
1. That the stairs located on the garage be removed.
.....Carried."
Committee of Adjustment~June 16, 2005
Page 8
10:40
Shirley Joan Thomas
Concession 3, East Part Lot 28, 51 R-1 0726, Part 1
1735 Ridge Road W. (Oro)
2005-B-21
2005-A-21
In Attendance: Mr. Douglas Hill, solicitor for the applicants, Eleanor Lyons,
daughter of applicant
Secretary-Treasurer read letter from Paul & Jane Walsh, 1753 Ridge Road,
dated June 13, 2005 & from Sharon Beattie, Engineering/Planning
Technician, County of Simcoe, dated June 15, 2005 verbatim to the
Committee members and those present in the audience.
BE IT RESOLVED that:
Moved by Michelle Lynch, seconded by Lynda Aiken
"That the Committee hereby grant Consent application 2005-8-21 for the
creation of a new residential lot and subject to the following conditions;
1.That three copies of a Reference Plan of the subject lands prepared by
an Ontario Land Surveyor be submitted to the Committee Secretary;
2. That the applicant's solicitor prepare and submit a copy of the
proposed conveyance for the parcel severed, for review by the
Municipality;
3. That all Municipal taxes be paid to the Municipality;
4. The applicant submits an entrance permit application and fee for the
relocation of the residential entrance;
5. The applicant obtains written confirmation from the County of Simcoe
to the Township of Oro-Medonte indicating that an entrance permit
application has been submitted and the proposed location of the
access is acceptable to the County of Simcoe;
6. The applicant shall install a fence at the existing entrance location and
permanently close the existing entrance upon fulfilling Condition 5;
7. That the applicant pay $ 2,000.00 for the lot created as cash-in-lieu of
a parkland contribution; and,
8. That the conditions of consent imposed by the Committee be fulfilled
within one year from the date of the giving of the notice.
.....Carried."
Committee of Adjustment*June 16, 2005
Page 9
-
BE IT RESOLVED that:
Moved by Michelle Lynch, seconded by Garry Potter
"That the Committee hereby approve minor variance application 2005-A-21 for a
reduced lot frontage of 20.979 metres (68.82 feet) and subject to the following
conditions:
1. That the conditions of Consent application 2005-8-21 be fulfilled
.....Carried."
Committee of Adjustment-June 16, 2005
Page 10
10:50
Constance McDermot
Conc. 1, Part Lots 20, 21 (Orillia)
57 Maplewood Parkway
2005-B-20
)-
In Attendance: Constance and John McDermot, owners
BE IT RESOLVED that:
Moved by Lynda Aiken, seconded by Garry Potter
"That the Committee hereby grant Consent application 2005-B-20 for the
creation of a new residential lot subject to the following conditions:
1.That three copies of a Reference Plan of the subject lands prepared by
an Ontario Land Surveyor be submitted to the Committee Secretary;
2. That the applicant's solicitor prepare and submit a copy of the
proposed conveyance for the parcel severed, for review by the
Municipality;
3. That the applicant pay $ 2,000.00 for the lot created as cash-in-Iieu of
a parkland contribution;
4. That the applicant pay a Development Charges Fee in the amount of
$4,055.78 (By-law 2004-082) to the Township;
5. That the applicants apply for and obtain a Driveway Entrance Permit
from the Roads Department for the land to be severed; and
6. That the conditions of consent imposed by the Committee be fulfilled
within one year from the date of the giving of the notice.
.....Carried."
Committee of Adjustment~June 16, 2005
Page 11
11 :00
Janet Lees
Plan 546, Lot 1 (Orillia)
5 Bards Beach Road
2005-A-17
-
In Attendance: Mr. Don Brydges, neighbour
Secretary-Treasurer read letter from Tim Salkeld, Resource Planner,
Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority, dated June 14, 2005 verbatim
to the Committee members and those present in the audience.
BE IT RESOLVED that:
Moved by Lynda Aiken, seconded by Michelle Lynch
"That the Committee hereby defer Minor Variance 2005-A-17 as per the
applicants request
.. ...Carried."
Committee of Adjustment~June 16, 2005
Page 12
11 :10
Laurel View Homes
Plan M741, Lots 56, 5, 64 (Oro)
21 Oakmont Ave, 10 Landscapes Dr, 80akmont
2005-A-22
2005-A-23
2005-A-24
a
IS) -/3
u'
In Attendance: Ms. Kris Menzies, agent representing applicants
BE IT RESOLVED that:
Moved by Dave Edwards, seconded by Garry Potter
"That the Committee hereby approve Minor Variance Application 2005-A-22
granting a variance of 7.2 metres (23.6 feet) for the construction of bow windows
from the minimum required rear yard of 7.5 metres (24.6 feet) subject to the
following conditions;
1. That the appropriate building permit be obtained from the Township's Chief
Building Official only after the Committee's decision becomes final and
binding, as provided for within the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P. 13;
2. An Ontario Land Surveyor provide verification to the Township of
compliance with the Committee's decision by 1) pinning the footing or
equivalent and 2) verifying in writing that the bow windows be located no
closer than 7.2 metres (23.6 feet) from the rear lot line; and,
3. That the setbacks be in conformity with the dimensions as set out in the
application, as submitted.
.....Carried."
BE IT RESOLVED that:
Moved by Lynda Aiken, seconded by Michelle Lynch
"That the Committee hereby approve Minor Variance Application 2005-A-23
granting a variance of 7.2 metres (23.6 feet) for the construction of bow windows
from the minimum required rear yard of 7.5 metres (24.6 feet) subject to the
following conditions:
1. That the appropriate building permit be obtained from the Township's Chief
Building Official only after the Committee's decision becomes final and
binding, as provided for within the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P. 13;
2. An Ontario Land Surveyor provide verification to the Township of
compliance with the Committee's decision by 1) pinning the footing or
equivalent and 2) that the bow windows be located no closer than 7.2
metres (23.6 feet) from the rear lot line; and,
3. That the setbacks be in conformity with the dimensions as set out in the
application, as submitted.
Committee of Adjustment-June 16, 2005
Page 13
BE IT RESOLVED that;
Moved by Dave Edwards, seconded by Lynda Aiken
"That the Committee hereby approve Minor Variance Application 2005-A-24
granting a variance of 7.2 metres (23.6 feet) for the construction of bow windows
from the minimum required rear yard of 7.5 metres (24.6 feet) subject to the
following conditions;
1. That the appropriate building permit be obtained from the Township's Chief
Building Official only after the Committee's decision becomes final and
binding, as provided for within the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P. 13;
2. An Ontario Land Surveyor provide verification to the Township of
compliance with the Committee's decision by 1) pinning the footing or
equivalent and 2) verifying in writing that the bow windows be located no
closer than 7.2 metres (23.6 feet) from the rear lot line; and,
3. That the setbacks be in conformity with the dimensions as set out in the
application, as submitted.
.....Carried."
5. Other Business
i. Adoption of minutes for May 12, 2005 Meeting
Moved by Michelle Lynch, Seconded by Lynda Aiken
"That the minutes for the May 12th 2005 Meeting be adopted as printed
and circulated
.. .Carried."
6. Adiournment
Moved by Dave Edwards, Seconded by Garry Potter
"We do now adjourn at 2:45 p.m."
... Carried."
(NOTE: A tape of this meeting is available for review.)
Chairperson,
Allan Johnson
Secretary-Treasurer,
Andy Karaiskakis
Committee of Adjustment~June 16, 2005
Page 14