04 27 2005 COW Agenda
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING AGENDA
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
DATE: WEDNESDAY, APRIL 27, 2005
TIME: 9:008.m.
1. NOTICE OF ADDITIONS TO AGENDA
2. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA
3. DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST AND THE GENERAL NATURE
THEREOF: - "IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ACT"
4. DEPUTATIONS:
None.
5. CORRESPONDENCE:
a) Patricia Copeland, Area Manager, The Lung Association, correspondence dated April
6, 2005 re: 2005 Tulip Day Campaign Letter of Appreciation.
b) Glenn Meeuwisse, Hardwood Hills, correspondence dated March 30, 2005 re: Partial
Road Closure Request, Line 6 North, June 4-5, 2005 and July 23, 2005.
c) Buffi Woronka, correspondence dated April 13, 2005 re: 2976 Highway 11, Concession
7, Lot 20, Plan 1145 Lots 6-8, (Oro), Township of Oro-Medonte.
d) Sharon Goerke, Deputy Clerk, Township of Severn, correspondence dated April 8,
2005 re: Capital Contributions - Coldwater Community Centre.
e) Correspondence Received Re: Proposed Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law
Amendment and Plan of Subdivision, Application No. 2004-0PA-02, 2004-ZBA-09,
2004-SUB-01, Concession 3, South Part of Lot 15 (Moon Point Corporation):
1) Francis Bowers, Mary O'Farrell-Bowers, Hayley Bowers, Patrick Bowers dated April
15,2005,
2) Heather and Brian Crate and Family dated April 4, 2005,
3) Jim Woodford dated March 31,2005.
f) Cameron Mack, Director, Fish and Wildlife Branch, Ministry of Natural Resources,
correspondence dated April 4, 2005 re: Sunday Gun Hunting in Ontario.
g) Andrew Fyfe, Senior Planner, City of Orillia, correspondence dated April 15, 2005 re:
Stone Ridge Subdivision (43T-03602).
h) Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority, minutes of February 25, 2005 meeting.
i) Janet Doughty, President, Warminister Soccer League, correspondence dated April 18,
2005 re: Warminster Soccer League [referred from Council meeting held on April 20, 2005].
6. FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND FIRE:
a) Recognition Comm ittee, correspondence dated April 18, 2005 re: 2005 Senior of the Year
Award [under separate cover].
b) Report No. ADM 2005-20, Marilyn Pennycook, Clerk, re: 2005 Summer Recess of Council /
Committee of the Whole Meetings.
7. PUBLIC WORKS:
a) Report No. PW 2005-04, Jerry Ball, Public Works Superintendent, re: Tender Results for:
PW2005-01-0pen Graded Pavement
PW2005-02-Calcium Chloride
PW2005-03-Supply and Apply Crushed Gravel
PW2005-04-Surface Treatment
PW2005-05-Slurry Seal
PW2005-06-Supply, Haul, Mix and Pile Winter Sand
PW2005-14-Dark Journal Virgin Oil
PW2005-16-Hot Mix Paving
8. ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES:
a) Report No. EES 2005-20, Keith Mathieson, Director of Engineering and Environmental
Services, re: Operation of Big Cedar Estates Water and Waste Water Plants.
9. BUILDING, PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT:
a) Committee of Adjustment Minutes, April 14, 2005 meeting.
b) Report No. BD 2005-08, 2034 Ridge Road and Line 2 (Pfrimmer).
c) Report No. BD 2005-07, Kim Allen, Manager of Building Services, re: Pit Bull Legislation Bill
132, (amendment to the Dog Owner's Liability Act come into effect August 29,2005).
10. IN-CAMERA:
a) Jennifer Zieleniewski, CAO, re: Legal Matter.
11. ADJOURNMENT:
2
THE
LUNG ASSOCIATION'"
48 Alliance Blvd. Unit #206
Barrie, ON L4M 5K3
705-733-7759 Phone
705-733-9943 Fax
www.on.lung.ca
April 6, 2005
I"RECEIVEDl
I APR 1 4 1005 I
'I ORO-MEDONTE I
I TOWNSHIP I
~q
Township of Oro-Medonte
148 Line 7 South
, ON, LOL 2XO
Attn: Carl Kobe
On behalf of the Georgian Bay office of The Lung Association, I would like to extend a
sincere thank you to you and all staff who participated in the 2005 Tulip Day Campaign.
The total amount raised in the Georgian Bay area was $13,080.00.
Those who breathe with difficulty, as well as those who breathe with ease, will be
empowered through our provision of quality up-to-date information on lung health.
Programs such as our Asthma Action Program, Breathworks, Air Quality, Lungs Are For
Life and Get On Track, as well as ongoing lung research, are supported through
donations.
We truly appreciate your ongoing support!
Yours truly,
1~
,/j f-:' /J /J ()
{rtuvuc~ ~ f:::~fL~
Patricia Copeland
Area Manager
<~,
,-
~acqUeline Devenish
Community Project Assistant
Charitable Registration No. 12404 6368 RR0002
Froffi:HARDWOOD HillS
705 4v/ r'1c'~
.' (j L J,;
D3/31J/2005 13:iJ3 #741 P .00 1/1J1J 1
fI1.~ 11404
Hardwood
.,
5b
Hardwood Hills
Nordic Ski &
Mountain Bike
Centre
March 30, 2005
---.---.... - '. ManJYR-~€ooj( .... .--.-
Township of Oro - Medonte
Fax (705) 487-0133
-,....~-.- -. .~.
......~......".._~-_.,..
Marilyn,
Hardwood Hil!s would like to request partial road closure of the 6th
Line of Orc, North of Old Barrie Road for approx 1 kIn.
The road closure would anow for bicycle crossing and bicycle
traffic for two specific events on the dates below.
These events are fully sanctioned and insured by the Ontario
Cycling Association.
402 W Old Barrie Rd.
RR 1
Ora Station
Ontario
LOL 2EO
1) Saturday/Sunday June 4/5 - Bike for the Cure Charity Ride, for the
Breast Cancer Foundation, and Canada Cup Mountain Bike
Events,
2) Saturday July 23 - Mountain Bike Relay Event.
Pennission for the same events was granted in 2004, with no
apparent problems. Please let me know if you require any more
information.
Phone
(705) 487.3775
I=ax
(705)487-2153
".mall
info@hardwoodhUls.ca
Web Site
IWlw.hardwoodhJ!/s.CB
Thank you for your consideration.
" ,/
/ ,/ ..
. ~ i ,'"
(.,'1-< ,'".. ...
~
Glenn Meeuwisse
Hardwood Hills
-:R{tf\\lcO
. ' 9-J.- ~
fc,-:z-f6 \2.....d~ . ~
(29.. ~ (Vz..o 5 T
LP l- -;z...Ez:>
\=\~'..JL \ ~ (0 S
(p-z-B ~c\-'Zf- ~:--~
(.2..~"3 ~o
T \,..0'- -::>-'='" / S
~::~b,;.~,e.~ ~ \ ?;;. 0
. __ "'~ 0-- ~~
~ ~~'. ~ ~_-;" ~ ;$o~o..t:t:f-
Sr<' vY"-'~~~ ~ <=..:1-- ~
d>c> .::;> 1'>-''<- ',s,. 0---'>': ~ J..- Q:J"t.P
~ ;:;,.~,. -\At-<>" \\ Of'
~ . ,_ 'S c:rt""' I
"Qv-~'"\ . --1. ,-So
~er>^-..\..A--- l"....~ . o-.^ ~ie.?C,("~'> 7
::\ ~ ~..........:\ ..,f C>~........ \,.0-<' .
~ .). J>-.~~~~ (...r> /0. /0<.>--"'-
. eX- c>- ~ VI-"- -....) U"'
:-\- ~\ PO~+ ~
\ of" ('>.0 . \o-^n.~ \ ~
....;) ...Q:,...,.;\" ~.p -0 . 0>-' (.:J,
~~.?J- ) ~~.....,.." ..
~ __' J,;;-C>'""-O- --- .
~iso-<>> ' "....?-:...,...-" Ioj.--~
J . d-JV'-~~ 1) 0"+0-"-"\..0 'so
~ () ~ .-5( -./0<-'-'
~..:.o-<-- ~ .;::,.J.-:""'- c::rt'-"- ~u ~ "'('/"\~
-1>-4/""''4s'" '....."'~ " .."".;>d-. J .
vP~" J'~ ~ ~ -='~
s:.,..... 'If" ~~ .~,}. "',..,... ~
*- ~~~ ~ ,:J J<o~
~of'" ~...,:> ~O~. ~ ..1
:.. .~~ ~crrr" _o~ C--~....
~. ~ ~ r~ ,v.:.
-\-",~f'--'> ~. W
, '-/""'........
<>> \-. "....:'< 0. C> / .
""^~. 2".:~ ~~ o,J
h:;\ \ 9 l~~~
ORO.tJ\E.DONiE
iO'NNSI-I\P .
., ~ ~ c..o<>-ncj
__\ ().;rt-o.. ~ o--r"
'D .
~~"",. .'
~ ~do~..c>- C~
?~ -3 L ~ 't~ ..' "
. ~ ~ ..,-0 ,r-. \-e.u..
cf<-... 0- ~ d\. d-- . LX 1..>-'-";) \
.. J ~ ~ \\
e-c:> r-- ~ ~ \r\ '--';) \-. ~O->\ '
~~\--'-\ ~cr0~
.A-.~ 0-""''-1
"Do ,-\<2~ -'< ~
~ ~'v::>e>v--' .
.....<.\""~,... ....,.s::(~......c>
-.J .d->-- 'C '-- cr-<'"' '-'./
Q",,., ~ c..c:rr-
"'\'" - .""7
3.0 ~~" c~ . J/"", '-';') 0 ~ ~.
~~ u
sV'~' \ '\
~~ 0~~
TOWNSHIP OF SEVERN
~~.
11#
1,1
~d - \
THE CORPORATION OF THE roWNSIDP OF SEVERN
P.O. Box 159, OrilIia, Ontario, L3V 6J3
RECEIVED
April 8, 2005
Township of Oro-Medonte
P.O. Box 100
Oro, Ontario
LOL 2XO
APR 1 4 1005
ORO-MEDONTE
TOWNSHIP
ATTENTION: Marilyn Pennycook, Clerk
Dear Ms. Pennycook:
RE: Capital Contributions - Cold water Community Centre
In reviewing the 2005 budget requirements, members of Council held
discussions with respect to the capital improvements required annually at the
Coldwater & District Community Centre. Discussions were also held with
respect to the implementation of user fees for the use of Township facilities by
non-residents.
The Township of Severn has appreciated your valuable contributions to this
facility in the past, but with the increase in costs to continue to comply with
health and safety legislation requirements and/ or for any significant capital
improvement projects, Council has determined that financial assistance is
imperative from neighbouring municipalities.
I have been requested to correspond with you and advise that the Township of
Severn would appreciate the execution of a formal agreement to provide for
annual contributions towards the capital improvements required for the
Coldwater Arena.
Enclosed are two (2) original agreements for your Council's consideration. It
would be appreciated if you would review the agreement and, if approved,
return same fully executed. Once Severn Township Council has executed the
agreements, one original will be returned to you for your file.
Municipal Office: 1024 Hurlwood Lane
Telephone: (705) 325-2315 Fax: (705) 327-5818
~d
-2-
Thank you for your continued support of this facility and the Township of
Severn looks forward to future co-operation with respect to the Coldwater
Community Centre. If you require additional information, please do not
hesitate to contact the undersigned at Ext. 232 or Henry Sander, Director of
Corporate Services at Ext. 227.
Yours truly,
Ji~1/:L0 C2wJa.
- ~
Sharon R. Goerke
Deputy Clerk
jsrg
Encls.
JOINT MUNICIPAL AGREEMENT
y
'"J
BETWEEN
The Corporation of the Township of Severn
("Severn")
- AND -
The Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte
("Oro- Medonte")
WHEREAS the Corporation of the Township of Severn is the owner
of the Coldwater & District Community Centre ("Centre");
AND WHEREAS the parties hereto are desirous of entering into an
Agreement to provide for the Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte to
submit an annual contribution to the Corporation of the Township of Severn
for capital improvements to the Coldwater & District Community Centre and
provide for the residents of Oro-Medonte to use the facility on the same terms
as the residents of Severn;
AND WHEREAS it is deemed expedient to provide for the appointment of
a representative of Oro-Medonte to participate on a Subcommittee of the
Township of Severn Recreation & Facilities Advisory Committee to recommend
capital improvements of the Centre to Severn Township Council;
NOW IN CONSIDERATION of the covenants and conditions and subject to the
terms and conditions of this Agreement, the parties agree as follows:
1. That Oro-Medonte shall submit a contribution towards anticipated
capital improvements to the Centre on or before July 31 st of the current
year, in accordance with the following proportions:
. 10% of the total electors registered in the Township of Oro-
Medonte multiplied by five dollars ($5.00) per capita.
-1-
. "Total Electors" shall mean and refer to the most recent
statistics published by the Regional Assessment Offices from
time to time.
2. That Severn shall annually contribute in total an amount from tax
revenues equal to 10% the total number of electors registered in the
Township of Severn multiplied by five dollars ($5.00) per capita.
3. The amount per capita shall increase annually in accordance with the
Cost of Living Index.
4. That Severn shall establish a separate Reserve Account which shall be
designated as the "Coldwater & District Community Centre Capital
Reserve Account".
5. That in the event that Oro-Medonte withdraws from participating in this
Agreement, all contributions to the Capital Reserve Account shall vest
with Severn and shall not be returned in whole or in part to Oro-
Medonte.
6. That the following controls shall be placed on the maintenance and
distribution of funds held in the Capital Reserve Account:
6.1 That the Capital Reserve Account shall be used solely and
specifically to hold and disburse funds required for capital
upgrading or expansion of the Centre and at no time whatsoever
shall these funds be used to offset operational costs incurred by
Severn.
6.2 That funds held in the Capital Reserve Account shall accumulate
year by year, together with any accrued interest or other monies
raised for capital improvements on the Centre.
7. The amount of the capital contribution shall be renegotiated every
five (5) years, if deemed necessary, and any change must be confirmed
by By-law of each municipality before it is implemented.
8. That the Township Treasurer for Severn shall establish separate Revenue
and Expenditure Accounts within Severn's general ledger which shall be
utilized to record all financial transactions for the Centre.
vr
9. That Oro-Medonte may make any further contributions towards the
Centre as its Council, in its sole discretion, deems appropriate and the
Township of Severn may request capital contributions from Oro-Medonte
in order for the facility to continue to comply with health and safety
legislation requirements or for a significant capital improvement project.
10. That the residents of Oro-Medonte, in consideration of this Agreement,
shall have all the same rights and privileges to use the Centre as the
residents of Severn.
11. That a representative of Oro-Medonte shall be appointed for the term of
Council and invited to attend all Subcommittee Meetings of the
Recreation & Facilities Advisory Committee when consideration is being
given to the capital improvements for the Centre.
12. The representative of Oro-Medonte shall have the same rights, including
voting rights, as every other member of the Subcommittee at meetings
which the representative is requested to attend. Severn shall advise Oro-
Medonte, in advance, of all such meetings at which the representative is
entitled to attend and vote.
13. That members of the Subcommittee shall, as required, report to their
respective Councils upon the nature and ramifications of any proposed
transfer of funds from the Capital Reserve Account.
14. The respective Councils of Severn and Oro-Medonte shall enact a By-law
authorizing the execution and adopting the provisions of this Agreement.
15. The execution of a By-law by either municipality shall not be construed
as the conveyance of any share of the assets or liabilities of the
Corporation of the Township of Severn.
16. This Agreement shaU enure to the benefit of and be binding upon the
parties and their successors and assigns for a period of five (5) years
from the date of execution. This Agreement shall be reviewed prior to its
expiration and may be renewed upon the written agreement of both
parties.
-3~
-
IN WITNESS HERETO the parties have affixed their Corporate Seals under the
hands of their authorized signing officers.
CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SEVERN
MAYOR
CLERK-TREASURER
CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-
MEDONTE
MAYOR
CLERK
T
~-\
Janette Teeter
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Neil Craig
Wednesday, April 20, 2005 10:03 PM
Marilyn pennycook
Fw: Opposition to Moonpoint Development
Members of
:ouncilours.doc (49..
Original Message -----
Frorn: "Marv O'Farrell-bower"
To: <dan.buttineau@oro-medonte.ca>; <harry.hughes@oro-medonte.ca>;
<joh.crawford~oro-medonte.ca>; <maryilyn.pennycook@oro-rnedonte.ca>; <neil.craig@oro-
medonte.ca>; <paul.marshall@oro-medonte.ca>i <Ralph.hough@oro-medonte.ca>;
<ruth.fountain@oro-medonte.ca>
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 10:18 PM
Subject: Opposition to Moonpoint Development
> Attached please find a document which details why our family, as
> residents of Oro-Medonte, are strongly opposed to this proposed
> development.
> The Bowers Family
>
1
Members of Council
Township Of Oro-Medonte
148 Line 7 South
P.O. Box 100
Oro, Ontario
LOL 2XO
Re: Proposed Amendments to the Official Plan and Zoning Bylaw pertaining
to the Concession 3, Part of Lot 15 and 16
Dear Mayor Craig and Council Members:
Pleased find detailed below reasons and rationale for our strong opposition
to the proposed amendments as detailed above.
Firstly, I would like to introduce ourselves and our relationship to the
Moonpoint community. We have resided in Oro-Medonte since 1984
having moved up rrom Toronto. We initially purchased lakerront property
between the 12th and 13th line ofOro where we resided until 1996. In the
early nineties, we started to look for wateruont property to build on and after
a lengthy process, we purchased property on Moonpoint. We were
immediately attracted to the rural character of the area, its proximity to
Orillia, the abundant wildlife and were happy to share our community with
the Columbus Boys Camp.
There are several reasons why we oppose this development in this
environmentally sensitive location.
1. Environmental - wetlands and low lying land
It is critical that environmental conditions be monitored over a
seasonal rotation as the conditions are dependent upon the season.
The consulting group appeared to have visited the site in mid-
summer which ultimately does not reflect the true nature of the
property year round. On the April 23rd visit they saw the spring
I
\.
'\
,
!
j
e - \ (~ ')
ephemeral pools, but dismissed them as not important (they are
important breeding habitat for amphibians). Others have observed
provincially threatened Jefferson Salamanders and one must not
forget to mention the natural benn, which is a critical element,
which cannot be negated.
2. Environmental- The protection of Lake Simcoe.
Much attention has been focused over the last several years on the
condition of the water and its state of wellbeing. The county and
the province are both looking at the conditions of our lakes and
rivers and it is critical that we in Oro-Medonte do our part to
ensure that we are acting responsibly and protecting our beautiful
lake. It is a water source for a number of households and a
development ofthis nature would only contribute to Lake
Simcoe's demise. We must wait under the provincial study on
Lake Simcoe is completed prior to even considering any more
development.
3. Environmental: The birds, wildlife and demise and destruction of
fish habitat.
One only has to walk down Moonpoint and Woodlands or canoe
on Lake Simcoe along the shorelines of this environmentally
sensitive area to witness the birds and wildlife that have chosen
this piece of property as their home. The Ecological Report
completed by the developer is weak to say the least. It is not a
comprehensive and accurate depiction of the true bird and wildlife
inhabitants in this area. It is essential that further research be
completed before consideration is even attempted to be given to
this development. Only this week my husband stopped to witness
four deer on Moonpoint and our concerns for their displacement
again reinforced the respect we should have for their lives and their
home.
4. Residential building requirements.
The Township ofOro-Medonte requires that the minimum lot
frontage for Shoreline Residential is 30m. As one can see by the
proposed plan of development the vast majority of the lots do not
meet this minimum requirement. They range in frontage size from
18m to 22m, which is a far cry from the minimum. The
rationalization that these lots need not comply because of their size
s ~ - \
and depth is totally unacceptable. It appears that every rule is
being "adapted" by the developer to maximize his profits. I recall
when we build our home that we had to comply with all the
policies and building requirements necessary for approval.
5. Residential Rural Designation
The Residential Rural designation was established to ensure that a
natural buffer exist between the city of Orillia and the rural nature
of the Township. One can assume that this was also established to
ensure that development does not occur and differentiate between
city and country living. To build on this natural buffer opens the
land between the City ofOrillia and the Township ofOro to start
to be developed like the massive subdivision that consumed so
much of the farmlands in the Wal-Mart area. I would beg the
Township not to set in motion the potential for such a disaster to
occur. We understand that Mr. Orsi purchased the property on
Woodlands to do just that and that he is probably waiting in the
wings to see if these amendments are approved thus "paving" the
way for his plans. This would be an absolute shame and the
Township ofOro-Medonte and its rural character would be lost
forever.
6. Tree Loss
To state that 70% of the trees on this property would be maintained
is truly unrealistic. One only had to listen to the developer stating
that the houses would be 5-6 feet off the ground on ground level to
start, thus requiring a massive amount of fill, could only lead one
to conclude that tree loss is inevitable. To further state that people
would purchase this property for the trees and not the waterfront
view is also unrealistic. We only have to look at Bass Lake area
and other waterfront developments to see that clear cutting is
certain to take place... with or without the developers "hopes and
intentions" that this would not transpire.. . such a loss is totally
unacceptable and again would have serious implications for Lake
Simcoe. If the property is changed by the removal of30% of the
trees, many more will die from exposure and change of the
moisture levels and fill. The loss will result in erosion problems.
7. Hydro-Geological Work
5 -\
There has been limited work to date to determine if there are
suitable conditions for the well digging that would be required in
such a proposed sub-division. The depth of the test pits and
evidence of non-conforming nitrate levels is again a serious
caution to any type of approval. If this proposed development is to
be considered any further in this environmentally sensitive land
then much more detailed work is required. There are serious
potential implications for our community and for Lake Simcoe.
One could go on and on providing sound rationale and reasoning
for this proposed development to not proceed. We have
highlighted some of the conditions that send serious warning flags
to us and to you as members of council. We must make sound and
environmentally wise decisions at this crucial time when our lakes,
wildlife and natural habitat are being constantly challenged.
We "implore" you not to approve the proposed amendments and we are
depending on you as our elected leaders to do the right thing and protect
our environment. We must act as role models for our children and
grandchildren and leave a legacy for our children.
Respectfully submitted,
Francis Bowers
Mary O'Farrell-Bowers
Hayley Bowers (15 years old)
Patrick Bowers (13 years old)
s~-
'I
J
April 4, 2005,
Mayor and Council of the Corporation of the
Township ofOro-Medonte
Re: Proposed Amendments to the Official Plan and Zoning By-Law, and the Proposed
Plan of Subdivision ofthe lands described as Concession 3, Part of Lots 15 & 16, situated
at the bottom of Moon Point Drive.
It is our understanding and belief that you, our respected Council, are elected to make
wise decisions that best serve the needs of the community and its constituents. We fully
appreciate that it is impossible to please all the people all ofthe time. But it is your
responsibility to become fully apprised of all of the available information and data, and
then rule, to the best of your ability, on what is best for the community as a whole, both
now and for future generations.
To the best of our knowledge, we believe that the Province has authorized $2.25 million
in funding to address population and growth concerns in Simcoe County, which includes
a phase I study of Lake Simcoe's ability to adapt to anymore growth and Lake side
development.
Any decision regarding development ofthe subject lands in advance of this study could
be viewed as untimely and irresponsible. Until such time as the final study and
assessment is available, the mitigating measure proposed by the Moon Point Developers
and their consultants to limit that impact ofthe development on the subject property and
Lake Simcoe, must be deemed premature, if not entirely irrelevant. The adequacy of
these measures can not possibly be determined without first considering the results of the
Provincial Study, the specific purpose of which is to address such concerns.
Please give the following your very serious consideration prior to making your decision
on the above matter!
This densely forested and wet section ofland is one of the last remaining natural
and undeveloped pieces of shoreline on Lake Simcoe.
The eco-system of Lake Simcoe is already in crisis, with fish and aquatic life
being in dire jeopardy.
This specific area acts as a natural protected habitat for a multitude of wildlife,
including being a sanctuary for a myriad of ducks and other migrating waterfowl.
The natural configuration of the shoreline lends itself to being a safe haven for
fish to lay eggs and spawn. It is a superior area for aquatic life to survive!
Shoreline water depth is minimal and would therefore require major dredging and
the installation of extremely long docks to accommodate the smallest of boats.
r:.
...J
The existing shoreline is heavily forested as well as being elevated and beffil-like.
This situation will definitely impede access to the Lake and will result in major
excavation and alteration to the shoreline areas. This action alone will totally
compromise the natural habitats that exist today.
There is no possible way to avoid irrevocably and irreversibly destroying the
delicate balance of nature, both on land and in the water, should this development
be allowed to proceed.
Money is nOffilally a driving force when decisions are about to be made! We
absolutely believe that your decision to reject this project will benefit the
Township of Oro-Medonte both financially and morally. A clean and healthy
Lake Simcoe will assist all relative municipalities in achieving growth and
prosperity now and for future generations.
Lake Simcoe is truly one of our County's greatest natural resources! You have the
opportunity and the power to make a difference. Please help save our Lake and the
environment; this is a far greater issue than just that of the Moon Poin Residents, it is for
the direct benefit of Simcoe County as a whole! There are already too many negative
legacies that we are leaving our children and grandchildren; we must do better now and
for future generations to come.
Please give your serious consideration to the above. We trust that you will reject the
proposed amendments to the Official Plan and Zoning By-Law, and the Proposed Plan of
Subdivision, at least until the report findings are in and reviewed.
Thank-You!
Respectfully Yours!
Heather and Brian Crate and Family
119 Moon Point Drive
R.R.#l Orillia, Ontario
Telephone # 326-8174
Business Address
Crate's Lake Country Boats Inc.
75 Forest View Drive
Forest Home Park
FOffilerly Hot Knots
Telephone # 327-9741
,
Original Message -----
From: "Pat & Jim Woodford"
To: "Mayor" <neil.craig@oro-medonte.ca>
Cc: "HHughes" "Ralph Hough"
<ralph. hough@oL'o-i'iiedon-ce. ca>; "KU-Cll .l:"ountain"
<ruth.fountain@oro-medonte.ca>; "Dan Buttineau"
<dbuttineau@town.penetanguishene.on.ca>; "Paul Marshall"
<paul.marshall@oro-medonte.ca>; "John Crawford"
"..J --~----
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 10:05 AM
Subject: Moon Point
> Neil
>
> Moon Point affords Council an excellent opportunity to show it is
> serious about its "Environment First" policy/philosophy.
>
> I have completed an assessment of the Moon Point Environmental Impact
> Statement (copies have forwarded to Council, Gayle Wood (LSRCA) and the
> media.
>
> My assessment clearly shows that the Moon Point EIS is not in
> compliance with the LSRCA EIS requirements.
>
> I suggest that Council write the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation
> Authority and request that the Authority does not approve/sign off on
> the Moon Point EIS until it meets the LSRCA requirements. This will
> entail another three-seasons of field work.
>
> The most glaring data deficiency is in fishes - a three season
> inventory by netting or electrofishing is required and has not been
> done.
>
> I would be pleased to discuss this with you at your convenience.
>
> Jim Woodford
>
1
E:.-
,"',
i-...
.....)
,
..,..,.
s~+)
Page 1 of2
Gary and Isabelle Thiess
From:
To:
Cc:
"Gary and Isabelle Thiess" <thiga@csolve.net>
<'neil.craig@oro-medonte,ca'>
<'harry. hughes@oromedonte.ca'>; <'dan. butti neau@oro-medonte.ca'>; <'joh n. crawford@oro-
medonte,ca'>; <'paul.marshal@oro-medonte.ca'>; <'ralph.hough@oro-medonte.ca'>:
<'ruth, fountain@oro-medonte.ca'>
April 14, 2005 1:26 PM
Proposed Plan of Subdivision 2004 - SUB -01
Sent:
Subject:
1 would like to comment on the proposed development planned for the Columpus Boy's Camp property
and suggest the ( plan? ) is premature. Environmental impact aside, the impaQt of concentrated heavy
truck traffic on every resident from Forest Home to the jobsite, consideripg th~ property density on the
residential streets and the current condition of the roads in question is enormoj.ls. Would a specified haul
route be considered, or better stilI new bridges on route from Memorial A venqe?
The ( plan?) for a dead end street is something born in the '50s that we overcame only 10 years ago,
when Pointview Drive and Moon Point Drive were joined to create easier ploqgbing in winter and also
the services that a good road provides, i.e.. police, fire, ambulance and garbage. This has to be a
consideration!
If this proposal should procced will the property remaining be open to similar severances given the
precedent that this one creates. The CAMP has an announced 5 year lease, just e!1ough time to sell the
current proposal. There is still lots of property left for more dead end streets
It was enlightening to witness the degree of in depth study the planning ~am pad amassed and the shoot
from the hip suggestion that the here to fore non existent surface water could 4n~ined by 3 culverts
through the natural berm to the lake. It is my understanding from a receQt adqress by a representative
from LSRCA that this policy is not acceptable without silt retention ponqs. Be ~ssured there are
considerable spring fed water sources throughout the area. A visit to the ~djac~nt Moon Point Drive
would demonstrate the significant ditching, and yes even to the lake culverts. rrrors made in the past,
are hardly reason for a continuance of bad practice as was hinted by the consultants in suggesting the
opponents to this project are on substantially smaller lots. These home owners live in subdivided lots
created in the 1950s. It is my understanding that the Township is planning a review oflakeshore
development and its impact - GOOD I hope you're serious.
You have an Official Plan that lists criteria for severance that have stringent guidelines for road
frontages for instance. Justifying a lesser frontage was possible because the lofs proposed were bigger
than the ones in the adjacent 1950s subdivision was crass. Surly we don't have to continue to make
mistakes just because someone who couldn't care less about Oro - Medonte except the substantial profit
to be made by bullying both you and us the taxpayers.
I recall a noted Om politician who gave good advice when he stated "You must always remember that to
be successful in the world of politics you don't do for one what you are not prepared to do for every
other - friend or foe."With that in mind please recognize the need to adhere to every aspect of your
Official Plan, it is the docnment that WE participated in creating. We Were mislead early on by Nick
MacDonald who assured us that the then current Township ofOrillia Official rllll was excellent and he
saw no reason for change. Official Plan Amendment 2004-0PA-2 woulq indiqate that someone didn't do
their homework, 14 lots do not represent a small change, What were YOll thi~iI'\g? Was this the planners
26/04/2005
",..",.
Page 2 of2
.
misinformation, a misprison so to speak.
Finally I feel I have to draw your attention to the impact your committee of a<ljustment has on the
community. A I950s error that allowed 2 - 100 foot lots to be severed into 4 - pO foot seasonal cottage
lots has given way to 4 permanent resident homes. Compounding the excessive lot coverage you now
have enormous garages dwarfing the houses with less than minimum set backs iTom the road
allowances. The only reason I mention this is a concern that beyond a subdiviqefs agreement, and the
best intention of council what would prevent a lot owner from elearing and filling the lowland portion of
the created lots totally contradicting the proposed plan.
Thanking you for this opportunity to express some of the concerns that we have, apart from the usual
dislike for change which is human nature I guess.
Yours truly
Gary and Isabelle Thiess (33 Moon Point Drive)
26/04/2005
April 4, 2005
Dear Mayor/Reeve:
We are seeking your support on behalf of your constituents, particularly farmers and rural
landowners, to help reduce wildlife. related crop and property damage in Southern Ontario.
The Proposal
Allow gun hunting on Sundays on private land during existing gun hunting seasons, which
remain subject to all restrictions under the Fish and Wildlife Conservation Act (FWCA), including
those associated with public safety and conservation.
The proposal does not affect your existing bylaws. Rather, the Ministry of Natural Resources
would begin the steps required to facilitate having your municipality added to the existing list of
those where Sunday gun hunting is allowed by regulation under the FWCA.
The Minister of Natural Resources, the Honourable David Ramsay, has asked that we contact
you to seek your support before taking any action.
Rationale
The agricultural community, including farmers and other landowners, have proposed that
allowing gun hunting in additional municipalities on private land during existing gun hunting
seasons, would be a beneficial and cost-effective means of helping address the significant and
expensive wildlife. related crop and property damage that is occurring in many parts of southern
Ontario. With the endorsement of the Ontario Federation of Agriculture (O.F.A.) and the Ontario
Federation of Anglers and Hunters (O.FAH.), we are requesting your support so that we may
adjust the regulation to allow gun hunting on Sundays on private property in additional
municipalities to help address the problems identified above.
Currently, Sunday gun hunting is permitted in some counties and townships in southern Ontario
(please see attached "Background Information on Sunday Gun Hunting"), and all of northern
Ontario (north of the French and Mattawa Rivers).
The purpose of this letter and accompanying background material is to obtain the agreement of
your municipality so that we can begin the work required to facilitiate adding your municipality to
the existing list of municipalities where Sunday gun hunting occurs.
We look forward to hearing from you and would appreciate receiving a resolution or other
indication of your support by May 14.
Please direct written or e-mail responses to:
John Brisbane
Fish and Wildlife Branch
Ministry of Natural Resources
Box 7000, 300 Water Street
Peterborough, Ontario
K9J 8M5
john.brisbane@mnr.gov.on.ca
5
If you have any questions, or would like to meet to discuss our proposal, please contact John at
the above e-mail address or by phone at 705.755-3180.
Sincerely,
Cameron Mack
Director, Fish and Wildlife Branch
Ministry of Natural Resources
cc Peter Jeffery, OFA
Andy Houser, OFAH
Scott Vokey, AMO
Susan Humphries, OMAF
Elizabeth McLaren, MMAH
Attach.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
SUNDAY GUN HUNTING IN ONTARIO
5
The present regulatory situation:
Most of the Sunday hunting regulations were implemented in the 1950s. Currently gun and
archery hunting on Sundays is allowed in northern Ontario, archery hunting on Sundays in
southern Ontario and gun hunting on Sundays in some areas in the southern part of the
province. Where municipalities specifically asked that Sunday gun hunting be allowed, the
Ministry agreed to those requests in the regulations resulting in the present regulatory situation.
Under the current regulatory scheme Sunday hunting using guns is permitted in the following
areas south of the French and Mattawa Rivers:
(i) the County of Renfrew, other than the Township of Raglan,
(ii) the United Counties of Prescott and Russell, and
(iii) the Township of Haldimand in the County of Northumberland;
(iv) the Townships of East Ferris, Bonfield, Calvin, Papineau-Cameron and Boyd in the
territiorial District of Nippissing.
Addtionally, under the current regulatory scheme, Sunday gun hunting/use of guns is allowed:
. on licenced game bird hunting preserves
. for protection of property, including agricultural deer removal authorizations
. for target shooting.
The above situations are subject of any no-discharge bylaws that municipalities have enacted.
Municipalities have the ability under the Municipal Act to enact no discharge bylaws to address
public safety concerns. Where these are in place they apply to both Crown and private lands,
throughout the week.
What's being proposed:
Throughout agricultural Ontario, farmers have increasingly expressed concerns about crop
damage from burgeoning populations of some wildlife species. Farmers understand and expect
some losses. However, reported levels for crop damage now exceed $40 million annually,
causing many in the farming community to ask for amendments to hunting regulations as one
means of helping address this problem. This message has also been brought forward by a
special Agricultural Advisory Team in its' October, 2004 report to government.
Minister Ramsay in his speech to the Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters' Conference on
Friday, February 18, 2005 with regard to Government efforts to reduce crop damage by deer
said the following: "I am asking my MNR officials and the Ontario Federation of Agriculture to
join the OFAH in discussing with municipalities ways of furthering those efforts. This will include
consultation on permitting gun hunting on Sundays on private property in southern Ontario."
The Minister has also clearly indicated that he does not intend to enact regulatory amendments
under the FWCA providing for Sunday gun hunting in a municipality unless that specific
municipality is supportive.
The Proposal:
Allow Sunday hunting with firearms on private land during existing gun hunting seasons, which
remain subject to all restrictions associated with public safety and conservation, including the
Fish and Wildlife Conservation Act (FWCA).
The proposal does not affect your existing bylaws. Rather, the Minister of Natural Resources,
would begin the steps required to facilitate having your municipality added to the existing list of
those where Sunday gun hunting is allowed by regulation under the FWCA.
r
t
Why:
Wildlife populations in Ontario are healthy and are increasing. While this is generally good news
there are a number of instances where populations have reached levels that are resulting in
unacceptably high negative impacts on agriculture, human safety and the environment.
The impacts are significant.
As noted, Ontario farmers are reporting wildlife related crop and livestock damage that exceeds
$40 million annually. While Farmers understand and accept some levels of predation on
livestock and crops as a cost of doing business they are increasingly expressing concern at the
magnitude of current losses.
The Canada Safety Council reports that in 2001 alone, wild animals were involved in over
10,600 reported property damage collisions with vehicles, 490 injury collisions and four fatal
collisions in Ontario. The Council further estimates that the average cost of reported property
damage claims is $3,100 and of personal injury claims is $12,000. Fatal accidents have an
average cost of $390,000 over and above the immeasurable cost of a human life.
Transport Canada identifies that collisions between wildlife and aircraft have resulted in the loss
of over 400 aircraft since 1950, and over 100 human lives since 1995 across North America.
Furthermore, they estimate that collisions between aircraft and birds cost the industry over $1.2
billion per year. In Canada annually, over 800 bird strike accidents are reported to Transport
Canada. Transport Canada further identifies that deer have been an ongoing problem at
Toronto's Lester B. Pearson International Airport for several decades. They also identify that
there have been recent deer problems at several smaller Ontario airports including
Peterborough, Kingston and Kitchener-Waterloo.
Public health and safety are also a growing concern. For example, where resident Canada
Goose populations are sizeable, the influx of materials from goose feces can contribute to
eutrophication of small ponds and streams damaging sensitive aquatic ecosystems. They also
can result in the contamination of drinking supplies and public beaches through e coli
contamination from the feces.
The need for landowners, in particular those in the agricultural community, to be able to protect
their property and livestock, has long been recognized and is reflected in law. Unfortunately, for
the individual landowner, the costs of providing protection can be high and are generally not
suitable for dealing with large, extensive populations of wildlife.
Allowing gun hunting on Sundays can help:
Hunting is an important, cost effective tool that can assist with this problem and several
jurisdictions across North America are actively encouraging hunters to help control growing
populations of wildlife. In Ontario, where specific species seem to be causing much of the
damage the Ministry of Natural Resources has already lengthened some seasons, and
increased the number of tags in some areas. While these measures have been helpful they
alone are not enough.
The Ontario Federation of Agriculture, the Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters and the
Ministry of Natural Resources believe that adjusting the existing hunting regulations to allow gun
hunting on Sundays during the normal open seasons will help. Allowing Sunday gun hunting will
further increase harvests levels and help address the problem in southern Ontario.
Private vs. Crown land in southern Ontario:
Most of the land in the southern part of Ontario is privately owned. The Minister's
announcement focused on private property as a reflection of that reality. During the
consultation process we anticipate that municipalities that are supportive of Sunday gun hunting
on private property within their area may also choose to let us know their views regarding
hunting on local Crown lands as well.
Potential conflict between hunters and non-hunters:
Hunters are trained to hunt responsibly. They know the rules and work hard to ensure they and
their peers abide by them. This includes knowing that trespassing is not allowed and
understanding the need to ensure they are welcome to hunt on property that is privately owned.
Your opinion matters:
The Minister has asked staff to work in co-operatively with the Ontario Federation of Agriculture
and the Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters to facilitate consultation with municipalities in
southern Ontario to determine their interest in having the Ministry amending the regulations to
allow Sunday gun hunting in their areas.
Please forward a resolution or other indication of your support for this proposal by May 14,
2005.
Contact:
John Brisbane
Program Management, Policy and
Strategic Planning Specialist
Fish and Wildlife Branch
Box 7000, 300 Water St.,
Peterborough, ON
K9J 8M5
Phone (705-755-3180)
Fax (705-755-1900)
e-mail iohn.brisbane@mnr.qov.on.ca
ORILLlA CITY CENTRE
50 ANDREW STREET SOUTH
ORILLlA, ONTARIO L3V 7T5
TELEPHONE (705) 329.7259
FACSIMILE (705) 329-2670
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT E-mail: afyfe@city.orillia.on.ca
@rillia
~
J
. Qt il~ l1f
April 15, 2005.
I RECEIVEDl
I APR 2 0 1005 I
I ORO-MEDONTE II
, TOWNSHIP .
!
Township of Oro-Medonte
Box 100
ORa ON LOL 2XO
Attention: Terrv Ball. Public Works Superintendent
Dear Mr. Ball:
RE: Stone Ridge Subdivision (43T-03602)
Your File: 023-13193 c001
This letter is to confirm the discussions between yourself, Andrea Leigh and City Staff regarding
traffic related matters arising from the proposed subdivision.
1. At the request of the City, the Developer's traffic consultant re-examined the location of
the proposed Street 'D' and its exit onto Bass Lake Sideroad. Due to topographical
constraints and sightline considerations, the entrance onto Bass Lake Sideroad cannot
be relocated and still provide sufficient separation from Hepinstall Place for traffic safety.
2. The level of anticipated traffic from Street 'D' onto Bass Lake Sideroad, the limited
proportion of that traffic which will be seeking to go West on Highway No. 12 and the
increased time to go via Hepinstall Drive and indicate that the likely impact on Hepinstall
Drive traffic volumes will not be significant.
3. Due to the phasing of the development, the construction of Street 'D' is a number of
years away.
4. If, despite the projections, traffic through Orsi Heights from Stone Ridge does become
an issue, rather than simply closing Hepinstall Drive at Bass Lake Sideroad which would
create difficulties for winter maintenance and access for emergency services, Hepinstall
Drive could be restricted to one-way only at Bass Lake Sideroad.
I believe this represents the nature of our discussions and the response of the City and the
Developer to the concerns raised.
...,
Yours tryly, :
I I (\ :
~,cu<--v / /
lndrew Fyfe, ~
Senior Planne
ARF/ml
Copy to: Mayor R. Stevens
Carl Cannon, Director of Planning and Development
Peter Dance, Director of Public Works
J. Zieleniewski
H:\D12 Subdivisions\43T -03602CharterConstLtdStoneRidgeEstates\!tr.04.15.05.Stoneridge. Traffic.doc
I
THE CORPORATION OFTHE
TOWN8tlIP
~-Of-ffff~~-
C//~- JP{:Jazo/2/e
148 Line 75., Box 100
Ora, Ontario LOL 2XO
Phone (705)487-2171
fax (705) 487-0133
www.oro-medonte.ca
November 30, 2004
File #023-13193 v001
Mayor Ron Stevens
The Corporation of the City of Orillia
50 Andrew Street South
ORILLlA, ON L3V 7T5
Re: Proposed Plan of Subdivision - Stone RidQe Estates
~COA
l'
Dear Mayor Stevens:
Further to my letter of January 8, 2004, I wish to reiterate an issue which has come to Council's
attention through numerous concerns expressed by residents of Oro-Medonte who live in the
vicinity of the proposed Stone Ridge Estates development. The residents have expressed
concern over possible increased traffic volumes and routing of traffic through the community
which lies north of the proposed City of Orillia subdivision. Their concerns have focused primarily
on the location of proposed Road "D" within the subdivision which exits onto Bass Lake Side
Road direclly opposit€ Hepinstall Place. I have enclosed a map depicting the area for ease of
reference.
Considering the cooperative relationship which exists between the City of Orillia and the
Township of Oro-Medonte, Council has requested that Oro-Medonte staff liaise with City staff to
bring our residents concerns to the fore and to investigate possible alternatives or remedies
which would address these concerns. I have no doubt that through our mutual collaboration and
sharing of information this issue can be resolved.
Thank you for your continued co-operation.
~Sinc?t 'c
.NeilC~ ~
I Mayor
Encl.lmp
c.c. Members of Council
Jennifer Zieleniewski, CAO.
tJ<hdria Leigh, Senior Planner
Jerry Ball, Public Works Superintendent
THE CORPORATION OF THE
s%
148 tine 7 S., Box 100
Oro, Ontario LOL 2XO
TOWN8tIIP
(!j~Of7f6ec&vde
Phone (7051487-2171
Fax (7051487-0133
www.oro-medonte.CiI
~ -~. I
f \....) "" . .
~.-'"
!
f
,,';;J.J
January 8, 2004
City of Orillia
Orillia City Centre
50 Andrew Street. S.
Orillia, Ontario.
L3V 7T5
Attention: Mayor Ron Stevens
J2qt..
Dear May~eVens:
,
RE: Subdivision Application 43T-03-602
Charter Construction Limited - Harvie Settlement Road
The lands, which are the subject of the above-noted application, are bounded by Bass
Lake Road on the north and Line 15 North on the west, both of which are boundary
roads between the City and Oro-Medonte. As such the subject application, and any
future development in this area, could have a significant impact on the Township of Oro-
Medonte. We appreciate being circulated the proposed draft plan for comment.
Preliminary comments and concerns respecting the application have already been
provided to your staff.
However, the Township is particularly concerned with the concept plan and schematic
road layout shown on the adjacent lands to the west of the subject application also
owned by the applicant. The road system shows two road connections to Line 15 North.
The Township of Oro-Medonte must be advised at the earliest stage of development of
these lands in order that it may review and comment on all aspects of this development.
We would appreciate an opportunity to meet with you and City staff to review our
concerns in regards to this major development on our mutual boundary.
Please contact me directly or our CAO, Jennifer Zieleniewski, to arrange a meeting.
Yours truly,
flY~~
Mayor Neil Craig
/,....... d71H.
CITY OF ORILLlA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING
If~?
)ce-~
RE: Application for Zoning By-law Amendments (D14-648): Lots 6 & 7, Part
of Lot 8 Concession 2, Geographic Township of Orlllia, now in the City of
Orillla.
TAKE NOTICE that the Council of the Corporation of the City of Orillia will hold a
Public Meeting on Mondav. Mav 2. 2005 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber.
Orillia City Centre. 50 Andrew Street South, to consider an application for proposed
amendments to the City of Orillia Zoning By-laws (Charter Construction Ltd.).
pursuant to the provisions of the Planning Act as follows:
Location:
The subject land is located south of Bass Lake Side Road, east of the Harvie
Settlement Road allowance.
Purpose and Effect of the Proposed Amendments:
The land in question is designated "Employment Area", "Living Area" and
"Environmentally Sensitive - Woodlot Overlay" by the City's Official Plan. The
easterly portion of the land is zoned "Rural" (R) under By-law 1973-100 and the
balance of the land is zoned "Orillia Holding" (OH) under the zoning by-law of the
former Orillia Township which currently applies to the land.
The proposed development would incorporate some 2,200 dwellings consisting
of a mix of single detached, linked units, townhouses and apartment buildings.
There is also a small neighbourhood commercial site, park sites. and potential
school sites.
The proposed Zoning By-law provides for the implementation of the proposed
subdivision layout and sets forth reduced lot coverage, frontages, areas and
setback requirements for the individual parcels which wouid be created.
A public meeling regarding the application. and an associated official plan
amendment and a draft plan of subdivision was previously held on June 29.
2004.
Related Applications:
It is anticipated that if the proposed amendments are approved. the applicant will
submit applications for Condominium and Site Plan Approval for specific blocks
of land as development pians for those sites are brought forward.
Information Available:
Information relating to the proposed amendments and the associated plan of
subdivision are available for review during business hours, in the Planning Office.
Oriilia City Centre, 50 Andrew Street South, Orillia, Ontario.
Oral and Written Submissions - Appeal:
If a person or public body that files an appeal of a decision of the Council of the
Corporation of the City of Orillia in respect of the proposed zoning by-law
amendments. does not make oral submissions at a public meeting or does not
make a written submission to the Councii of the Corporation of the City of Oriilia
before the proposed by-laws are adopted. the Ontario Municipal Board may dismiss
all or part of the appeal.
Any person may aitend the Public Meeting andlor make written or verbal
representations either in support of or in opposition to the proposed amendments.
For further information, please contact R. Carl Cannon at (705)329-7241 or
Andrea Woodrow (705)325-3977 during business hours or visit the Planning
Office in the Orillia City Centre, 50 Andrew Street South. 3rd Floor.
Da18d. April 8. 2005 RECEIVED
APR 1 3 2005
ORO-MEDONTE
mWN~W.D
,
.......<fi0"'.
,,"".-
..-
I """.~"..
Ii
Ii
,
. .
""'''''',,_...,
--.....,..
:::_~ ~k::.
_.,..~
DRAFT PLAN
OF SUBDIVISION
Rezoning application-
Charter Construction
Lots6 and 7, Part of lot 8
Concession 2
~:~;a~hiC Township of Orilli!!
_mine
CityofOrilHa
Simcoe County
z
<(
-I
0...
>-
W
~
.~
LAKE SIMCOE REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
54th ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING
BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING NO. BOD-02-05
.-, \
\]\--,-
FRIDA Y, FEBRUARY 25TH, 2005
9:00 a.m.
Town of Newmarket
"Council Chambers"
395 Mulock Drive
Newmarket, ON
MINUTES
2004 Board of Directors - Present:
R. Bridge. Chair
V. Hackson. Vice-Chair
P. Brown
E. Bull
G. Davidson
B. Drew
R. Grossi
B. Huson
P. Marshall
M. Nanowski
J. Rupke
S. Self
K. Shier
T. Taylor
J. West
J. Young
2004 Board of Directors- Regrets:
J.O. Dales
K. Ferdinands
G. R. Richardson
R. Stevens
N. Snutch
Staff:
D. Gayle Wood
S. Hanson
M. Walters
R. Baldwin
D. Goodyear
T. Hogenbirk
B. Kemp
K. Kennedy
G. Peat
D. Williams
H. McKinnon
G. Casey
M. Abouatallah
K.Adams
K. Baker
P. Cottenden
B. Burr
L. Cotton
G. Davis
M. Dennis
P. Dennis
A. Gynan
P. Harnett
H. McKinnon
R. Regier
D. Thompson
K.Zhao
Guests:
I. Smith. Ministry of the Environment
D. Beatty. Lake Simcoe Conservation Foundation
E. Crossland, Lake Simcoe Conservation Foundation
C. Wansborough, Lake Simcoe Conservation Foundation
B. Dell, Georgina Chamber of Commerce
P. Thatcher, York Environmental Stewardship
A. Scott. City of Barrie
Councillor B. Van Berkel, Town of Innisfil
Councillor D. Ramsarren, Town of Newmarket
Councillor J. Sponga, Town of Newmarket
H. Hirji, Scotia Bank
K. Hill. Hill Hunter Losell Law Firm
C. Worte, Conservation Ontario
S. Von Kursell, Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing
B. Allister, Grant Thornton
Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority
Board of D!rectors' Meeting
541' Annual General Meeting
Minutes
February 25"', 2.005.
s~~
I. CHAIR'S WELCOME AND INTRODUCTIONS
Chair Bridge opened the meeting by welcoming everyone and asked all ofthe Board
Members to introduce themselves and identify the municipality which they represent.
II. DECLARATIONS OF PECUNIARY INTEREST
There were no declarations of Pecuniary Interest.
III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Moved by:
Seconded by:
J. West
S. Self
BOD-05-35:
RESOLVED THAT content of the Agenda be
approved as presented.
IV. ADOPTION OF MINUTES
a) Board of Directors
Minutes ofthe Board of Directors Meeting No. BOD-01-05 held January 28th, 2005.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
J. Rupke
V. Hackson
BOD-05-36:
RESOLVED THA Tthe minutes ofthe Board of
Directors meeting No. BOD-01-05 be adopted
as printed.
V. GREETINGS
Greetings were received from Mayor James Young, York Region and the Town of
East Gwillimbury, Councillor Susan Self, Durham Region, Alec Scott, City of Barrie,
Councillor Bill Van Berkel, Town of Innisfil, Councillor George Davidson, City of
Kawartha Lakes, Councillor Mikki Nanowski, Town of Bradford West Gwillimbury,
Councillor Barbara Huson, Town of New Tecumseth, Councillor Paul Marshall,
Township of Oro-Medonte, Charley Worte, Conservation Ontario, Sybelle Von Kursell,
Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, Paul Thatcher, York Environmental
Stewardship.
Page 2 of 13
Lake Simcoe Region Conservation ,A,uthority
Board of Directors' Meeting
54'" Annual General Meeting
Minutes
February 25"'. 2005
~. GUEST SPEAKER
S~- 3
The CAO introduced Mr. Ian Smith, Ministry ofthe Environment. The CAO worked with
Mr. Smith during her tenure as Co-Chair of the Source Protection Planning Technical
Experts Committee during 2004. Mr. Smith lead the staff team which assisted the
Committee in meeting its deadlines and subsequently produced the Technical report.
The CAO advise that Mr. Smith is a recipient of the Amythyst Award which is an
award presented to Civil Servants by the Province in recognition of outstanding
performance. The CAO further advised that Mr. Smith was recently promoted to the
position of Director, Drinking Water Program Management Branch.
Mr. Ian Smith provided a presentation entitled Source Protection Planning - Creating
a Road Map for Implementation.
Following this presentation, the floor was opened for questions from the Board.
Clarification regarding a portion offunding coming from water and sewage rates was
requested. It was identified that a major portion of some municipalities are on private
wells and therefore this would not be a feasible source of funding. In some
municipalities, the costs associated with water testing are absorbing the budgets.
The Province will be addressing the rural rates to determine what the relative
concentration of efforts is in urban as opposed to rural landscapes.
The Board inquired ifthe Source Protection Planning initiative will present new levels
of liability on the Authority's Board in terms of accountability.
Mr. Smith responded that this is being discussed regarding protection with the
provincial lawyers.
The CAO indicated that as SPP evolves, staff will be consulting with our Legal
Counsel and Conservation Ontario Insurance Committee regarding this matter and
will provide the Board with further information.
With regard to the involvement of First Nations, it was indicated thatthe majority of the
islands in the Town of Georgina are either fully or partially occupied by First Nations.
Why are First Nations not being mandated to participate in this initiative as part of
being a contributor?
Mr. Smith advised that provincial regulations cannot be imposed on federal lands.
However, the province is encouraging participation and the First Nations are
interested.
Page 3 of 13
Lake Simcoe Region Conservation j.:.,uthority
Board of Directors' Meeting
54!r1 Annual General Meeting
Minutes
February 25"',2.005.
5-~- '1
In relation to the significant risk practices, the Board inquired iffunding will be made
available to modify practices in order to bring the owner in line with the regulation?
Mr. Smith indicated that if the practice in question requires financial support (Le.
easements) that would be preferred to expropriation. However, ifthe involved parties
are not willing to participate voluntarily, then other options will be considered.
The Board inquired if capital funding will be made available to the agricultural
community (ie. to fence cattle out of streams)?
Mr. Smith advised that the province continues to work with the federal government to
partner on such initiatives. Landowners are more willing to undertake this type of
project if more funding is available. Municipal funds also need to be part of these
discussions.
The CAO advise that the Authority will lead the planning process to address all
alternatives on how to best protect our water. Municipalities are taking the lead role
on the implementation and the Authority can best assist their municipalities with Best
Management Practices. The Authority will be looking at working closely to develop
some good programs to protect these sources.
Mr. Smith, on behalf of Minister Dombrowsky, thanked the Authorityforthe opportunity
to present before them and advised that the province looks forward to working
together over the next several years on the Source Protection Planning initiative.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
J. West
G. Davidson
BOD-05-37
RESOLVED THAT the presentation provided
by Mr. Ian Smith regarding Source Protection
Planning, be received.
Chair Bridge advised that Source Protection Planning is not a small undertaking and
that the Authority's Board and staff are looking forward to working with the province
on this very important initiative. Chair Bridge extended thanks to Mr. Smith for taking
time to present before the Board.
The CAO introduced to Mr. Smith and the Board of Directors the Authority's Source
Protection Planning Team:
Mike Walters, Director, Watershed Planning (will lead theSPP Team)
Don Goodyear, Manager, Source Protection Planning
Mary Abouatallah, Administrative Assistant, Source Protection Planning
Kelin Zhao, GIS/Database
Page 4 of 13
Lake Simcoe Region Conservation p,uthority
Board of Directors' lVIeetlng
541h AnnuaJ Genera! Meeting
Minutes
February 25''', 2005
5~-5
The CAO advised that she will also be involved in the SPP process and will also be
working on the governance model.
VII PRESENTATIONS
(a) 2004 Conservation Authoritv's Annual Report
Chair Bridge provided an overview of the Authority's accomplishments throughout
2004 highlighting the involvement of the CAO as Co-Chair of the Source Protection
Planning Technical Experts Committee, the release of the LSEMS "State of the Lake
Simcoe Watershed" report and the Province of Ontario investing $1.5 million in the
LSRCA and the Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority to undertake an
Assimilative Capacity Studies.
The Authority's Annual Report was tabled at the meeting and Chair Bridge encouraged
everyone to take a moment to review it.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
J. Young
K. Shier
BOD-05-38:
RESOLVED THAT the Lake Simcoe Region
Conservation Authority's 2004 Annual Report
be received for information.
(b) 2004 Conservation Foundation - Annual Report
Mr. Ernie Crossland, President, Lake Simcoe Conservation Foundation, extended
thanks to the Authority's Board for the invitation to appear before them at their Annual
General Meeting. Mr. Crossland introduced Mrs. Debby Beatty from the Foundation
advising that, on behalf of the Lake Simcoe Conservation Foundation, Mrs. Beatty will
be presenting the Foundation's 2004 Annual Report. The report was tabled at the
meeting which outlined the Foundation's many accomplishments. Mrs. Beatty also
advised that Lisa Eveleigh had tendered her resignation at the Executive Director of
the Foundation.
Following the presentation, Mrs. Beatty thanked the Authority's Board fortheir past and
ongoing support of the Foundation.
The CAO advised that the Foundation's support has been very valuable over the past
several years and the Authority appreciates the financial assistance from the
Foundation for the many projects to protect the health and quality of Lake Simcoe.
Page 5 of 13
February 25"'. 2005.
Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority
Board of O;rectors' Meeting
54'" Annual General Meeting
Minutes
Moved by:
Seconded by:
BOD-05-39
5"~-~
J. West
V. Hackson
RESOLVED THAT the 2004 Conservation
Foundation update and Annual Report be
received for information.
The Chair concluded the year 2004 business. A 10 minute recess was called at 10:05
a.m.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
BOD-05-40
VIII. 2005 BUSINESS
J. West
S. Self
RESOLVED THAT the Board of Directors
conclude the 2004 business and declare the
Chair vacant.
Gayle Wood, Chief Administrative Officer of the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation
Authority called the 2005 Business Meeting to order at 10: 15 a.m.
IX. ELECTION OF OFFICERS
The CAO advised that she would be conducting the election of officers and reviewed
the general rules for the election process as outlined in the agenda.
X. a) Appointment of Scrutineers
Moved by:
Seconded by:
BOD-05-41
J. Rupke
T. Taylor
RESOLVED THAT in the event of a vote by
ballot, the following persons: Mr. Ken Hill, Hill
Hunter Losell Law Firm and Mr.Hanif Hirji,
Scotiabank, will act as scrutineers; and
FURTHER that all ballots be destroyed after
the election.
Page 6 of 13
Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority
Board of Directors' Meeting
54tll Annual General Meeting
Minutes
February 25"',2005
b) Election of Officers for 2005
I; ~-l
(i) Chair of the Authority
Board Member Paul Marshall nominated Councillor Bridge for the position of Chair.
To support this nomination Councillor Marshall advised that Mr. Bridge has been
associated with the Authority for 10 years, and has just completed his fourth year as
Chair and continues to demonstrate his strong dedication and support of the Authority.
Nominations were called three times.
No other nominations were received.
Councillor Bridge accepted the nomination with pleasure.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
J. West
G. Davidson
RESOLVED THAT the nominations for the
position of Chair be closed.
Chair Bridge extended his thanks to the 2005 Board Members for all of their support
and advised that he looks forward to continuing to work together for another year.
(ii) Vice Chair of the Authority
Board Member Susan Self nominated Councillor Virginia Hackson to continue in the
position of Vice Chair. Councillor Self advised that Councillor Hackson has lived in the
Lake Simcoe watershed all of her life and continues to give 100% when it comes to
protecting Lake Simcoe and its watersl)ed.
Nominations were called three times.
No other nominations were received.
Councillor Hackson accepted the nomination.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
S. Self
J. Young
RESOLVED THAT the nominations for the
position of Vice Chair be closed.
Page 7 of 13
Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority
Board of Directors' Meeting
54t~1 Annual General Meeting
Minutes
FebrU80J 25''', 2005.
5~:<6
Vice Chair Hackson thanked the Board for their continued support and advised that
she enjoyed the past year as Vice Chair and looks forward to the many challenges in
2005.
c) Appointment of the Administrative Committee for 2004
The CAO advised that the responsibility of the Administrative Committee is to deal with
personnel issues. with the process of the new Administrative Building and to review the
nominations for the annual conservation awards. The CAO further advised that the
Chair and Vice Chair are automatically appointed to the Administrative Committee
and the Board must now appoint three additional representatives at large.
.
Board Member T. Taylor nominated J. West
Board Member P. Marshall nominated N. Snutch
Board Member V. Hackson nominated S. Self.
Nominations were called three times.
No other nominations were received.
Councillors' West. and Self accepted the nomination. Councillor Paul Marshall
accepted the nomination of Councillor Snutch in his absence.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
K. Shier
P. Brown
RESOLVED THAT nominations for the
appointment to the Administrative Committee
be closed.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
R. Grossi
G. Davidson
BOD-05-42
RESOLVED THAT the Chair, Roy Bridge, Vice
Chair, Virginia Hackson and three members
John West, Neal Snutch and Susan Self be
appointed to the Administrative Committee.
The CAO congratulated the Chair and Vice Chair and the members of
the Administrative Committee.
Page 8 of 13
February 25"', 2005
Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority
B'oard of Directors' Meeting
54!rJ Annual Genera! Meeting
Minutes
5~-~
d) Appointment of the ReQulations Sub Committee for 2005
The CAO provided a brief background regarding the purpose of the Regulations Sub
Committee.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
BOD-05-43
J. Young
J. Rupke
RESOLVED THATthe Chair and the Vice Chair
ofthe Conservation Authority and the Member
representing the local municipality in which
the fill and construction application is received
shall be Members of the sub-committee to
review applications in the field, as such
inspections are determined and authorized by
the Board of Directors.
e) Appointment to Conservation Ontario for 2004
Moved by:
Seconded by:
BOD-05-44
S. Self
V. Hackson
RESOLVED THAT the 2005 Authority Chair be
appointed as the Authority's voting delegate to
Conservation Ontario; and
FURTHER THAT the Chief Administrative
Officer/Secretary-Treasurer be the alternate
designate.
f) Appointment of Foundation Members for 2004
The CAO announced that the Executive Director of the Foundation had recently
tendered her resignation to accept another position. The CAO advised that the
interview process has taken place for a potential replacement and it is being
recommended that the new Executive Director will report through the CAO.
The Board requested further information regarding the specifics associated with the
position of the new Executive Director. Given the confidentiality of the information, the
CAO recommended that the Board move to Closed Session at the end of the meeting
to discuss this matter further.
Page 9 of 13
February 25'''. 2005.
Lake Simcoe Region Conservation ,A,uthority
Board of Directors' Meeting
54'" Annual General rv1eeting
Minutes
S~-l 0
The recommendation regarding the appointments to the Foundation Board will be
tabled until after the Closed Session discussion.
g) Appointment of Solicitors for 2005
The CAO provided a brief background regarding the purpose of appointing the
Authority's solicitors.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
BOD-05-45
J. West
P. Marshall
RESOLVED THAT Stiver Vale, Monteith Baker
Johnston, Hill Hunter Losell Law Firm and
Beard Winter be appointed as the Authority's
legal firms for 2005.
h) Appointment of Auditor for 2005
The Director, Corporate Services advised that the Authority's Board of Directors, at
their meeting on October 22,2005, dealt with Staff Report No. 62-04-BOD regarding
the proposal call for external audit services. At that meeting, the Board approved the
firm of Grant Thornton be appointed to provide external audit services forthe period
2004 to 2008 inclusive, subject to annual review.
XI. Siqninq Officers
The Director, Corporate Services and Land Management spoke to the Signing
Officers resolution.
The CAO advised thatthe directive ofthe Board to have cheques in excess of $25,000
be signed by the Chair or Vice Chair and the CAO has been implemented.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
BOD-05-46
J. Young
T. Taylor
RESOLVED THAT an account in the name of
Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority
(hereinafter called the "Organization") be kept
at the Bank of Nova Scotia (hereinafter called
the "Bank"); and
Page 10 of 13
Lake Simcoe Region Conservation P.,uthority
B-oard of Directors' Meeting
54'" Annual General Meeting
Minutes
February 25"', 2005
S~ _l\
THAT Roy Bridge, Chair, Virginia Hackson,
Vice Chair, D. Gayle Wood, Chief
Administrative Officer/Secretary-Treasurer and
Sandra Hanson, Director of Corporate
Services and Land Management, or any two of
them are hereby authorized for and in the
name of the Organization to sign, make, draw,
accept, endorse and deliver cheques,
promissory notes, bills of exchange, orders for
the payment of money and such agreements
and instruments as may be necessary or
useful in connection with the operation of the
said account; and
THA T anyone ofthe above-mentioned officers
is hereby authorized for and in the name of the
Organization to endorse and transfer to the
Bank for deposit or discount with or collection
by the Bank (but for the credit of the
Organization only) cheques, promissory notes,
bills of exchange, orders for the payment of
money and other instruments, to arrange,
settle, balance and certify all books and
accounts with the Bank and to sign receipts
for vouchers; and
XII.Borrowing Resolution
The Director of Corporate Services presented Staff Report No. 08-05-BOD regarding
borrowing advising that the Authority has never had to draw from this loan agreement
however it is a mechanism in place in the event it is required.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
J. Rupke
R. Grossi
BOD-05-47
RESOLVED THA T Staff Report No. 08-05-BOD
on Borrowing Resolution be received for
information and;
FURTHER THAT the signing officers for the
Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority
be empowered to borrow up to $500,000 on a
Operation Loan Agreement, from time to time
as required, for administration and/or capital
expenditures.
Page 11 of 13
February 25"'.2005.
Lake Simcoe Region Conser/at.ion Authority
Board of Directors' Meeting
54'" Annual General ME:eling
Minutes
s""- \ d-.
XIII. 2005 Meeting Schedule
The CAO presented Staff Report No. 09-05-BOD which contained information on the
dates set for the Board of Directors' meetings and those of the Administrative
Committee for 2005.
The CAO advised that the March meeting of the Board is earlier in the month, March
18,2005, due to the Easter weekend being on the fourth weekend on the month.
Further, the CAO advised that with the new building project, additional meetings of the
Administrative Committee will likely be added to the present schedule.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
BOD-05-48
J. West
M. Nanowski
RESOLVED THAT Staff Report No. 09-04-BOD
be received; and
FURTHER THA T the 2005 schedule of
meetings for the Lake Simcoe Region
Conservation Authority be approved.
Prior to the Board moving to "Closed Session" the CAO requested permission to
include Ernie Crossland, President, LSCF, Director, Corporate Services and Land
Management, the Director, Watershed Management, and the Manager, Corporate
Communication, in the "Closed Session" discussions.
The Board approved this request.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
BOD-05-49
Moved by:
Seconded by:
BOD-05-50
J. West
V. Hackson
RESOLVED THAT the Authority's Board of
Directors move to "Closed Session" to
discuss confidential personnel issues.
T. Taylor
J. Rupke
RESOLVED THAT the Authority's Board of
Directors rise from "Closed Session" and
report their progress.
Page 12 ot 13
Lake Simcoe Region Conservation l~\uthority
Board of Direciors' Meeting
54\~; jl,nnua! Genera! Meeting
f'v1inutes
Moved by:
Seconded by:
BOD-05-51
Moved by:
Seconded by:
BOD-05-52
XIV. Adjournment
S. Self
P. Marshall
RESOLVED THAT the LSRCA advise the
Foundation that it will not employ a staff
member for the Foundation without the
candidate being considered through the
appropriate Authority Human Resources
process and policy; and
THA T the Foundation be advised that should
Authority policy not be followed, the Authority
will re-consider funding commitments to the
Foundation for 2005; and
FURTHER THAT a copy of this resolution be
forwarded to the Authority's lawyer for legal
advice.
J. West
S. Self
RESOLVED THAT the 2005 Authority Chair,
Vice Chair and the Chief Administrative
Officer/Secretary-Treasurer be appointed to
the Lake Simcoe Conservation Foundation.
Meeting adjourned at 11 :30 a.m. on a motion by J. Rupke.
original signed by:
original signed by:
R. Bridge
Chair
D. Gayle Wood
Chief Administrative Officer/
Secretary Treasurer
February 25"'. 2005
Sl-'r3
Page 1 3 of 13
Page 1 ot 1.
'~ - \
Ruth Fountain
From:
To:
Cc:
"J. Doughty"
<neil.craig@oro-meaome.ca>
<harry. h ug hes@oro-medonte.ca>; <: dan. buttineau@oro-medonte.ca>; < ralph. hough@oro-
medonte.ca>; <john.crawford@oro-medonte.ca>; <ruth. fountain@oro-medonte.ca>;
<paul.marshall@oro-medonte.ca>; <recreation@oro-medonte.ca>
Monday, April 18, 2005 10:20 PM
Warminster Soccer League
Sent:
Subject:
Mayor Craig and Counsellors,
Warminster Soccer League is a non-competitive league that has been running for over ten years. Our
league has a good reputation and with over 550 children registcred this year we are looking forward to
another fun season.
With the OMHA rules that exist our children play hockey in Coldwater (Severn) or Orillia. They also
play baseball and t-ball in Coldwater or Orillia. For other sports many pay the user fee and go to
Orillia. With the busy schedules of families and pricc of gas today, we take our children to activities
that are close to home so any programmes that are run by the Parks & Rec. department out of the
Guthrie Arena are just not an option. Most of our players live in the Township of Oro-Medonte. We
would like to ask what the township offers the children in our community. What is going to make them
want to stay and raise their children here?
We have not asked for much from the township in the past. We ask for the grass to be cut on Tuesdays
so it is in good shape for playing, but if we were not using the field you would sti11 have to cut the
grass. We ask for a few garbage barrels and for them to be emptied weekly (saving the township
picking up litter everywhere), and while we would like more than two, the township puts two port-a-
potties in the 'park' for the 1500 people we have in the field each week.
Other than that we run pretty smoothly without asking too much of the township. If we find any large
rocks in the field, the township has come and removed them. But leaving them is a liability should
someone fall and get hurt. We were told the field would be top-dressed this year, and that has since
change.d as it is not in the budget, so we understand and just keep our eyes open for problem spots that
may arIse.
For the past two years the Township has generously lined our fields for us and we appreciate this very
much. This year we were told it was not in the budget so they would no longer be able to do it. We
understand this completely so we asked how much it would cost if we were to pay for it. We were
quoted a figure of$160 per time plus we would have to supply the lime (which we have done in the past
years). Our season is ten wecks long and when you do the math, this figure seems rather high to us.
Stop and think about it. At the very most it may take two people threc hours to line the fields. But this
is if they are trying to stretch out the time and make lot of money at it. So, $160 is more than
$25/hour /person. We are trying to keep our league affordable to the children. It is for the children that
we volunteer our time to keep this organization running. Our league gives them healthy social
interaction as well as helping to keep them physically fit so we would like to ask if you could please
reconsider this figure and see if we can't arrive at one that our league can afford as well as covering your
costs.
Remember it is for the children. It is not a business we are running, but an organization run by
volunteers giving of there time for the children. We arc giving of ourselves to keep the children happy
and healthy. Can you help us reach our goal?
4/2012005
Thank you.
. "
Janet Doughty
President
Wanninster Soccer League
wanninstersoccer@rogers.com
phone # 327-1226
fax # 327-8922
---. --.--'-.-
_ _~_.~'C~-
~----,
-
Page", ot '"
4/20/2005
Minister
Responsible for
Seniors
6lhFloor
400 University Avenue
T cronto ON M7 A 2A9
Tel.: (416) 585-7000
Fax: (416) 585-6470
Ministre delegue
aux Affaires des
personnes agees
6~ etage
400, avenue University
Toronto ON M7 A 2A9
Tel.: (416) 585-7000
Telec.: (416) 585-6470
~
~
Ontario
February 2005
Dear Mayor and Members of Council:
Each year the Government of Ontario designates June as Seniors' Month to celebrate the
countless experiences, accomplishments and contributions of seniors. Across the
province, community organizations and local governments host special events to
recognize seniors and the countless contributions they make to Ontario's way of life.
It is with great pleasure that we invite you to participate in the 2005 Senior of the Year
Awards. This award was established in 1994 to give each municipality in Ontario the
opportunity to honour one outstanding local senior.
Recipients are individuals, who after age 65, have enriched the social, cultural or civic
life of the community, without thought of personal or financial gain. The certificate,
provided by the Ontario Government, is signed by: the Honourable James K. BartJeman,
Lieutenant Govemor; the Honourable John Gerretsen, Minister Responsible for Seniors;
and the local Head of Council.
The Government of Ontario is proud to offer this important initiative. You may wish to
consider involving local MPPs in your selection process or presentation ceremony.
Please fax the name of your municipality's Senior of the Year A ward recipient, on the
attached form by May 27,2005.
For additional information, please contact the Ontario Honours and A wards Secretariat at
(416) 314-7526.
Ontario's seniors deserve special recognition for their outstanding accomplishments. By
working together with municipalities, we can ensure they are honoured in a meaningful
way.
Sincerely,
REC-EIVED
John Gerretsen
Minister
Encl.
MAR 0 7 1005
ORO-MEDONTE
TOWNSHIP
'. ,
Senior of the Year Award 2005
Name of Recipient: Lola Pickard
It is fitting on this the year of the 25th anniversary of Terry Fox's run
that Lola Pickard who has played such and active role over the years
be nominated as Oro-Medonte's Senior of the Year Award.
"In the summer of 2001 Lola Pickard began recruiting friends and
neighbours to help her in the organization of an annual Terry Fox Run
for Oro-Medonte Township, hosted in the community of Sugar Bush.
It is the only Terry Fox Run site (excluding schools) in the Township.
In her role as run site organizer, Lola has had to wear many hats,
publicizing the site, procuring donations, encouraging committee
members, communicating with the provincial Terry Fox Foundation
office and of course collecting pledge money as she, herself,
participates in the run each year.
Since 2001, Lola has come through each year with a team of
volunteers to put together a run that raises ever-increasing sums of
money to donate to the Terry Fox Foundation in support of cancer
research. From the initial Sugar Bush run in 2001 when $3,150 was
raised, up to last year's site record of $10,168, the event has brought
in over four years a grand total exceeding $25,000."
Lola is a dedicated mother, grandmother, neighbour and friend. She
is the type of lady who invites the neighbourhood kids in to make
Christmas cookies, or play with the toys in the toy box on her front
porch
April 18, 2005
I
10-
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
REPORT
Dept. Report No. To: Prepared By:
ADM 2005-20 Committee of the Whole Marilyn Pennycook, Clerk
Subject: Department:
Council
2005 Summer Recess of Administration
C.ofW. Council! Committee of Date: April 25, 2005
the Whole Meetings
Motion# A.M. File #:
Date: RolI#:
II BACKGROUND:
II
In previous years, Council has approved a summer recess of the regularly scheduled
Council and Committee of the Whole meetings for the months of July and August.
I ANALYSIS:
II
Consideration was given to equally balance the meetings between the regular meeting
schedule ending in June and beginning in September.
The following, for Council's consideration, is a suggested summer recess schedule (a
calendar view of the below suggested meeting dates is attached):
. Wednesdav. June 22. 2005 @ 9:00 am
Regular Committee of the Whole followed by a Special Council Meeting to ratify the
Committee of the Whole recommendations.
. Wednesdav. Julv 13. 2005 @ 9:00 am
Committee of the Whole followed by a Special Council Meeting to ratify the
Committee of the Whole recommendations.
. Wednesdav. Auaust 10, 2005 @ 9:00 am
Committee of the Whole followed by a Special Council Meeting to ratify the
Committee of the Whole recommendations.
Special Meetings of Council may be called on an "as needed" basis.
The regular schedule of Council and Committee of the Whole meetings would resume
on Wednesday, September 7,2005.
II RECOMMENDATION(S):
II
1. THAT Report No. ADM 2005-20 be received and adopted,
2. THAT the summer recess schedule be adopted as follows:
. Wednesday, June 22, 2005 @ 9:00 am
Regular Committee of the Whole followed by a Special Council Meeting to ratify
the Committee of the Whole recommendations.
. Wednesday, July 13, 2005 @ 9:00 am
Committee of the Whole followed by a Special Council Meeting to ratify the
Committee of the Whole recommendations.
. Wednesday, Auqust 10, 2005 @ 9:00 am
Committee of the Whole followed by a Special Council Meeting to ratify the
Committee of the Whole recommendations.
. Special Meetings of Council may be called on an "as needed" basis,
3. AND FURTHER THAT staff and the public be notified accordingly.
Respectfully submitted,
~r ~
/jV ~.
~~~~
Marilyn PE1nnycook
Clerk
C.A.O. Comments:
Date:
/
r\..cu/---
C.A.O.:
Dept. Head:
- 2 -
June. 2005
IJ1b-3
,,", Fri SO'
2 3 .
. 10 11
,. 11 ,.
23 2' 25
S,. Mo. T" W,d
1
Council, 7:00 pm
5 $ 7 .
Commitlee Q!
Whole,9:00lilm
12 13 " 15
Council, 7:00 pm
19 20 21 22
Col11mitteeo!
Who$e,9;OOam
SpecialCouf\cil
Immediately
!ollowin
2. 27 2. 29
30
S,. ,,~ T" W,d "', F,i S'"
2
3 . 5 . 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 " 15 '.
Commitlee of
!he Whole, 9;00
am Special
Council
immediately
!ollowin
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
2. 25 2. 27 28 29 30
31
August
SIIn M~ ,,, Wd ,,", Frj SO'
1 2 3 . 5 .
7 .. . 10 11 12 13
Committee of
the Whole, 9;00
am Special
CooneR
immediately
lollowin
15 ,. 11 18 19 20
AMO Annual Conference
21 22 23 2' 25 2. 27
2. 2' 30 31
September 7
Regular Council,
7:00pm
\
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
REPORT
Dept. Report No. To: COMMITTEE OF THE Prepared By:
WHOLE
PW2005-04 Jerry Ball
Subject: Department:
Council Tender Results for:
PW200S-01-0pen Graded Pavement Public Works
C.ofW. PW200S-02-Calcium Chloride Date:
PW200S-03-Supply and Apply Crushed April 21, 2005
Gravel
Motion # PW200S-04-Surface Treatment R.M. File #:
PW200S-0S-Slurry Seal
PW200S-06-Supply, Haul, Mix and Pile RolI#:
Date: Winter Sand
PW200S-14-Dark Journal Virgin Oil
PW200S-16-Hot Mix Pavino
II BACKGROUND:
II
Advertisements for the following Tender Contracts were placed in the Barrie and Orillia Newspapers
and were opened at the Administration Centre on Thursday, April 14, 2005 at 10:00 a.m. Three
public representatives, the Assistant to the Clerk, and the Public Works Superintendent were present
during the opening:
Contract No. PW2005-01
Contract No. PW2005-02
Contract No. PW2005-03
Contract No. PW2005-04
Contract No. PW2005-05
Contract No. PW2005-06
Contract No. PW2005-14
Contract No. PW2005-16
Open Graded Pavement
Calcium Chloride
Supply and Apply Crushed Gravel
Surface Treatment
Slurry Seal
Supply, Haul, Mix and Pile Winter Sand
"Dark Journal" Virgin Oil
Hot Mix Paving
II ANALYSIS:
II
The results of the tender contract opening for Open Graded Pavement are as follows:
I CONTRACT NO. PW2005-01
OPEN GRADED PAVEMENT
1) Lafarge Canada Inc.
$153,806.08
CMS-2 - O.58i/kg.
HL-4 - $34.92/Tonne
2) Miller Paving Limited
$143,315.80
CMS-2 - 0.63i/kg.
HL-4 - $27.65/Tonne
It is recommended that the tender from Miller Paving Limited be accepted at a low tender amount of
$143,315.80.
The results of the tender contract opening for Calcium Chloride are as follows:
I CONTRACT NO. PW2005-02
CALCIUM CHLORIDE
1) Da-Lee Dust Control
2) Miller Paving Limited
3) Pollard Highway Products Inc.
$103,534.27
$117,915.07
$107,387.88
$276.46/Tonne
$314.86/Tonne
$286.75/Tonne
It is recommended that the tender from Da-Lee Dust Control be accepted at a low tender amount of
$103,534.27.
The results of the tender contract opening for the Supply and Apply of Crushed Gravel are as follows:
I CONTRACT NO. PW2005-03
SUPPLY AND APPLY CRUSHED GRAVEL
1) Duivenvoorden Haulage Ltd.
2) Georgian Aggregates & Construction Inc.
3) K. J. Beamish Construction Co. Limited
4) Lafarge Canada Inc.
5) G. H. Stewart Construction Inc.
6) Rober! E. Young Construction Ltd.
$282,673.20
$302,279.25
$304,036.22
$299,585.45
$326,492.90
$242,275.95
It is recommended that the tender from Robert E. Young Construction Ltd. be accepted at a low
tender amount of $242,275.95.
The results of the tender contract opening for Surface Treatment are as follows:
I CONTRACT NO. PW2005-04
SURFACE TREATMENT
1) Duncor Enterprises Inc.
$81,532.42
It is recommended that the tender from Duncor Enterprises Inc. be accepted at a tender amount of
$81,532.42.
- 2-
The results of the tender contract opening for Slurry Seal are as follows:
I CONTRACT NO. PW2005-05
SLURRY SEAL
1) Duncor Enterprises Inc.
2) Miller Paving Limited
$144,706.80
$136,318.00
$1.38/sq.m.
$1.30/sq.m.
It is recommended that the tender from Miller Paving Limited be accepted at a low tender amount of
$136,318.00.
The results of the tender contract opening for the Supply, Haul, Mix and Pile of Winter Sand are as
follows:
I CONTRACT NO. PW2005-06
SUPPLY, HAUL, MIX AND PILE WINTER SAND
1) Duivenvoorden Haulage Ltd.
$64,505.15 (South Yard)
$57,845.97 (North Yard)
$83,844.90 (South Yard)
$76,338.10 (North Yard)
2) G. H. Stewart Construction Inc.
It is recommended that the tender from Duivenvoorden Haulage Ltd. be accepted at a low tender
amount of $64,505.15 for the South Yard and $57,845.97 for the North Yard.
The results of the tender contract opening for "Dark Journal" Virgin Oil are as follows:
I CONTRACT NO. PW2005-14
"DARK JOURNAL" VIRGIN OIL
1) Da-Lee Dust Control
$111,280.00
0.52i/litre
It is recommended that the tender from Da-Lee Dust Control be accepted at a tender amount of
$111,280.00.
The results of the tender contract opening for Hot Mix Paving are as follows:
I CONTRACT NO. PW2005-16
HOT MIXPAVING
1) K. J. Beamish Construction Co. Limited
2) Lafarge Canada Inc.
$52,470.65
$61,283.72
It is recommended that the tender from K. J. Beamish Construction Co. Limited be accepted at a low
tender amount of $52,470.65.
II RECOMMENDATION(S):
11
1. THAT Report No. PW2005-04 be received and adopted.
2. THAT the following tenders be awarded:
"l<'"l - '-i
CONTRACT
NO. DESCRIPTION CONTRACTOR TOTALAMOUNT
PW2005-01 Open Graded Miller Paving Limited $143,315.80
Pavement
PW2005-02 Calcium Chloride Da-Lee Dust Control $103,534.27
PW2005-03 Supply and Apply Robert E. Young $242,275.95
Crushed Gravel Construction Ltd.
PW2005-04 Surface Treatment Duncor Enterprises Inc. $81,532.42
PW2005-05 Slurry Seal Miller Paving Limited $136,318.00
PW2005-06 Supply, Haul, Mix and Duivenvoorden Haulage $64,505.15 (South)
Pile Winter Sand Ltd. $57,845.97 (North)
PW2005-14 "Dark Journal" Virgin Da-Lee Dust Control $111,280.00
Oil
PW2005-16 Hot Mix Paving K. J. Beamish Construction $52,470.65
Co. Limited
3. AND THAT the respective Contractors be notified accordingly.
Respectfully submitted,
Jerry Ball
Public Works Superintendent
/?uf'-.-~
JU , /"
C~ 0.(\;).\ \ C)'>
(\(0). 0
~
- 4 -
,0 \
'6 -
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
REPORT
Dept. Report No. To: COMMITTEE OF THE Prepared By:
WHOLE
EES2005-20 Keith Mathieson
Subject: Department:
Council
Operation of Big Cedar Engineering and
Estates Water and Waste Environmental Services
C.ofW. Water Plants Date:
April 21, 2005
Motion # R.M. File #:
Date: RolI#:
II BACKGROUND:
II
At the Regular Committee of the Whole Meeting held on January 12, 2005, correspondence was
received by the Big Cedar (Oro) Residents Association requesting the possibility of the Township of
Oro-Medonte assuming responsibility for the operation of their water and waste water systems. Staff
was authorized to investigate and report back to Council.
II ANALYSIS:
II
After a site visit by Mr. Keith Mathieson, Director of Engineering and Environmental Services; Mr.
Fred MacGregor, Environmental Services Foreman; and Mr. Gary Watson, Operator, to inspect the
water and waste water facilities, and to review Big Cedar Estates Certificates of Approval and Permit
to Take Water, the attached proposal dated February 3,2005 was presented to the Big Cedar (Oro)
Residents Association.
By way of correspondence dated April 14, 2005, Big Cedar (Oro) Residents Association notified the
Township that they agree to the proposal dated February 3, 2005. Big Cedar Estates are requesting
the Township to start operation responsibilities of their water and waste water systems on April 30,
2005, upon Council's approval and prior to entering into an Agreement, which shall not be
detrimental to the Township.
II RECOMMENDATION(S):
n
'"6 01, -
II
1. THAT Report No. EES2005-20 be received and adopted.
2. THAT the Township of Oro-Medonte enters into a Water and Waste Water System Operations
Agreement with Big Cedar Estates to operate their water and waste water systems, as outlined in
the correspondence dated February 3, 2005.
3. THAT Big Cedar Estates be advised that a Township overtime rate will be applicable and
considered in the Agreement.
4. AND THAT Big Cedar (Oro) Residents Association and Ministry of the Environment (Barrie Office)
be notified of Council's decision.
/'~,
/ I
Resfec/) submitted,
~.
Keith Mathieson
Director of Engineering and Environmental Services
, ./
~~/D\
- 2-
THE CORPORATiON OF THE
148line7S., Box 100
Orc, Ontario LOL 2XO
TOWN8tIIP
(!!j~Of7#b~
Phone (705) 487-2171
fax (705) 487-0133
vvvvw.oro-medonte.ca
February 3, 2005
. -
LD'/-II$3\
Big Cedar (Oro) Residents Association
Big Cedar Estates
P.O. Box 500
R. R. #2
HAWKESTONE, Ontario
LOL 1 TO
ATTENTION: Mr. Bruce Porter, President
Re: Operation of Biq Cedar Estates' Water and Waste Water Plants
Dear Mr. Porter:
The Township of Oro-Medonte presently has certified Operators on staff that are
qualified to operate both your water and waste water treatment plants.
After review of your Certificate of Approval, Permit to Take Water, and Engineers'
Report prepared by C. C. Tatham and Associates Ltd., I would suggest the following
operating requirements could be performed by Township staff on your behalf:
WATER
}- Daily (seven days/week) grab samples of the chlorine residual at the pump
house and in the distribution system;
}- Weekly microbiological sampling in the distribution system;
}- Weekly sampling of raw water. During the daily grab sampling, Township staff
would record well flows, distribution flows, check operation of well and pump
house, make any minor adjustments, add chlorine, and record all information in a
log book to be located in the pump house;
.. ./2
Page Two
Letter to Big Cedar (Oro) Residents Association
Re: Operation of Big Cedar Estates' Water and Waste Water Plants
February 3, 2005
~ Chemical testing requirements, per Schedule 13 of Reg. 170/03 and your present
Certificate of Approval, would be completed by Geospec Engineering Ltd. in
conjunction with Township testing. A copy of Geospec's estimated cost to
complete these tests has been enclosed;
~ All repairs to the distribution system would be completed by Big Cedar Estates
staff. Township staff would be notified of these repairs and would be responsible
for operating any valves or hydrants;
~ Any repairs to equipment within the pump house or well house would be the
responsibility of Big Cedar Estates. Any repairs completed by Township staff
would be charged to Big Cedar Estates;
~ Calibration of flow meters annually.
WASTe WATER
Upon review of M.O.E.'s Inspection Report dated January 4, 2005, the following
monitoring would be performed by Township staff:
~ Confirmation of recording flows is required;
Daily quantities of sewage being conveyed to lagoon
or
Estimated flows prepared and approved by Engineer;
~ Lagoon effluent flows to be recorded dailv to spray field;
~ Grab samples of lagoon effluent (ahead of spray irrigation) must be collected
monthly at the beginning of, and during each month, of the spray season;
~ Grab samples of groundwater, three times each year from each of the monitoring
wells; prior to, middle, and end of each spray season;
~ Two (2) soil samples from the spray irrigation, collected annually, prior to spray
season;
~ PH monitored bi-weekly;
. . ./3
Page Three
Letter to Big Cedar (Oro) Residents Association
Re: Operation of Big Cedar Estates' Water and Waste Water Plants
February 3. 2005
>- Monitoring of flow, daily, to spray field to ensure the capacity of 457.5 cm/day is
not exceeded;
>- Quarterly sampling of raw effluent;
>- Notify Township two (2) weeks prior to the start of spraying;
>- Calibration of flow meter, annually, by outside contractor.
All annual reporting to the M.O.E. would remain the responsibility of Big Cedar Estates;
I understand C. C. Tatham and Associates Ltd. presently prepare these reports on your
behalf. All necessary information would be provided to them in a timely manner.
The Township would require copies of all Ministry permits, certificates, and operational
manuals.
The Township and Big Cedar Estates would enter into a Water and Waste Water
System Operations Agreement that would be to the satisfaction of Township Council
and Township solicitor.
The Township of Oro-Medonte is proposing a cost of $55.00, per hour, which would
include the Operator's time and use of vehicle to perform the above-mentioned
monitoring requirements. If this proposal is acceptable to you, I would then proceed to
Council for approval.
Please contact the undersigned at (705) 487-2171 after you have had the opportunity to
review this proposal.
Kel Mathieson, C.R.S.I.
Director of Engineering and Environmental Services
KM/ps
Enclosure
-
Big Cedar (ORa) Residents Association
P.O. Box 500, Big Cedar Estates, A.R. #2, Hawkestone, Ontario, Canada LOL no
(705) 325-7100 FAX: (705) 325-4633
1-800-669-4894
RECEIVED
April] 4th. 2005
APR 1 5 1005
ORO-MEDONTE
TOWNSHIP
Township of Oro-Medonte
148 Line 7 S.. Box 100
Oro, Ontario
LOL 2XO
Attention: Mr. Keith Mathieson.
Director ot Engineering and Environmental Services
Dear Mr. Mathieson,
After review. the Board ot Directors of the Big Cedar (Oro) Residents Association have
decided to engage the services ot Oro-Medonte Township's certified operators, to
operate our water and waste water treatment plants as outlined in your proposal dated
February 3.d. 2005.
We understand that the Township and Big Cedar 10rol Residents Association will enter
into a Water and Waste Water System Operations Agreement. Since we are required by
the Ministry of Environment to have an operator in place by April 30'h, we are asking that
you accept this letter as agreement of your proposal as of this date. and we ask that you
proceed to Council for approval and then notify us.
It you have any questions, please feel free to call our office. We thank you in advance
and look forward to working with you.
On behalf of the Board of Directors.
~k Q. -po-et-
Brenda A. Post
Office Manager
~~
~l6i
"Cot, --=-- ~.ti.
JI.,. OWI\IEt) cO
-
Committee of Adiustment Minutes
Thursdav April 14, 2005, 9:30 a.m.
In Attendance: Chairman Allan Johnson, Member Dave Edwards, Member
Michelle Lynch, and Secretary-Treasurer Andy Karaiskakis.
Absent Member: Lynda Aiken
1. Communications and Correspondence
Correspondence to be addressed at the time of the specific hearing.
2. Disclosure of Pecuniary Interest
None declared
3. HearinQs:
9:30
Viola Tuck
Conc. 1, South Part Lot 16 (Oro)
861 Penetanguishene Road
2005-B-09
In Attendance: Mr. Charles Style, solicitor, Ms. Viola Tuck, applicant, and
Wayne Dibbon, neighbour.
BE IT RESOLVED that:
Moved by Dave Edwards, seconded by Michelle Lynch
"That the Committee hereby Defer Consent Application 2005-B-09 as per the
applicants request
.....Carried."
Committee of Adjustment-April 14, 2005
Page 1
9:40
Steve & Lori Dyball
Conc.9, West Part Lot 17 (Oro)
565 Line 8 North
2005-A-07
q
In Attendance: Steve & Lori Dyball, applicants
BE IT RESOLVED that:
Moved by Dave Edwards, seconded by Garry Potter
"That the Committee hereby approve the portion of Minor Variance Application
2005-A-07 being the permission to permit an 89.06 m2 (958 ft2) detached
accessory building and that the Committee deny the portion of Minor Variance
2005-A-07 being the permission to construct the detached accessory building in
the setback limits of the Environmental Protection (EP) zone and subject to the
following conditions:
1. That prior to issuance of a building permit, an Ontario Land Surveyor
provide verification to the Township of compliance with the Committee's
decision by 1) pinning the footing and 2) verifying in writing prior to pouring
of the foundation by way of survey/real property report prepared by an
Ontario Land Surveyor;
2. That the proposed garage be no closer than 2 metres (6.5 feet) from the
interior side lot line;
3. That the proposed garage be no closer than 10.66 metres (35 feet) from the
rear lot line;
4. That the setbacks be in conformity with the dimensions as set out in the
application and on the sketches submitted with the application and
approved by the Committee; and,
5. That the appropriate building permit be obtained from the Township's Chief
Building Official only after the Committee's decision becomes final and
binding, as provided for within the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P. 13.
.....Carried."
Committee of Adjustment.ApriI14, 2005
Page 2
9:50
Harvey Johnstone
Conc. 10, West Part Lot 21
137 Line 9 South (Oro)
2005-B-11
In Attendance: Mr. Harvey Johnstone, applicant, and Ms. Marie Burleigh, 51
School House Road
Secretary-Treasurer read letter from Christine Gutmann, Planner 11-
Environmental, County of Simcoe dated April 12, 2005 relating to
applications 2005-B-11 and 2005-B-13 verbatim to the Committee members
and those present in the audience.
BE IT RESOLVED that:
Moved by Garry Potter, seconded by Dave Edwards
"That the Committee hereby Deny Consent Application 2005-B-11 as the
applicant has not owned the farm operation on the lot from which the
severance is proposed for at least ten (10) years as required under Section
2.3.2.1 in the Official Plan
.....Carried."
Committee of Adjustment-April 14, 2005
Page 3
10:00
Ian Johnstone
Cone. 10, West Part Lot 22 (Oro)
2005-B-12
In Attendance: Mr. Ian Johnstone
BE IT RESOLVED that:
Moved by Dave Edwards, seconded by Michelle Lynch
"That the Committee hereby Defer Consent Application 2005-B-12 as per the
applicants request to allow time for the applicant to revise the application and
relocate the proposed severed lot.
.. ...Carried."
Committee of Adjustment~April14, 2005
Page 4
10:10
Harvey & Dianne Johnstone
Conc.9, East Part Lot 22 (Oro)
234 Line 9 South
2005-8-13
In Attendance: Harvey & Dianne Johnstone, applicants
BE IT RESOLVED that:
Moved by Dave Edwards, seconded by Michelle Lynch
"That the Committee hereby Grant Provisional Consent for Application 2005-B-
13 subject to the following list of conditions:
1. That three copies of a Reference Plan for the subject lands indicating the
severed parcel be prepared by an Ontario Land Surveyor be submitted to
the Secretary-Treasurer;
2. That the applicants' solicitor prepare and submit a copy of the proposed
conveyance for the parcel severed, for review by the Municipality;
3. That all municipal taxes be paid to the Township of Oro-Medonte;
4. That the applicant apply for and obtain a re-zoning on the severed land to
accurately reflect the residential land use;
5. That a Development Charges Fee in the amount of $4055.78 be paid to
the Township of Oro-Medonte;
6. That the applicant pay $ 2000.00 for the lot created as cash-in-lieu of a
parkland contribution; and,
7. That the conditions of consent imposed by the Committee be fulfilled
within one year from the date of the giving of the notice.
.....Carried."
Committee of Adjustment~Apri114, 2005
Page 5
10:20
Audrey Evans
Conc. 13, Part Lot 12 (Ora)
2005-B-15
In Attendance: Mr. Dwight Evans, representing applicant
BE IT RESOLVED that:
Moved by Garry Potter, seconded by Dave Edwards
"That the Committee hereby Grant Provisional Consent for Application 2005-B-
15 subject to the following conditions:
1. That three copies of a Reference Plan for the subject land indicating the
severed parcel be prepared by an Ontario Land Surveyor and submitted
to the Secretary-Treasurer;
2. That the applicant's solicitor prepare and submit a copy of the proposed
conveyance for the parcel severed, for review by the Municipality;
3. That the severed lands be merged in title with the northerly 36 acres and
that the provisions of Subsection 3 or 5 of Section 50 of The Planning Act
apply to any subsequent conveyance or transaction involving the subject
lands;
4. That the applicant's solicitor provide an undertaking that the severed
lands and the lands to be enhanced will merge in title;
5. That the applicant provide the Township with a deed of transfer for a 3
metre road widening for the subject lands;
6. That all municipal taxes be paid to the Township of Oro-Medonte; and,
7. That the conditions of consent imposed by the Committee be fulfilled
within one year from the date of the giving of the notice.
.....Carried."
Committee of Adjustment-April 14, 2005
Page B
%
10:30
Georjan Farms Limited 2005-B-16
Concession 14, West Part Lot 8, West Part Lot 9 (Oro)
In Attendance: Mr. George Anderson, owner of Georjan Farms Limited
BE IT RESOLVED that:
Moved by Michelle Lynch, seconded by Garry Potter
"That the Committee hereby Grant Provisional Consent for Application 2005-B-
16 subject to the following list of conditions:
1. That three copies of a Reference Plan for the subject lands indicating the
severed parcel be prepared by an Ontario Land Surveyor or a
registerable description and submitted to the Secretary-Treasurer;
2. That the applicant prepare and submit a copy of the proposed
conveyance for the parcel severed, for review by the Municipality;
3. That all municipal taxes be paid to the Township of Oro-Medonte; and,
4. That the conditions of consent imposed by the Committee be fulfilled
within one year from the date of the giving of the notice.
.....Carried."
Committee of Adjustment~ApriI14, 2005
Page 7
10:40
Georjan Farms Limited 2005-B-17
Concession 14, West Part Lot 8, West Part Lot 9 (Oro)
In Attendance: Mr. George Anderson, owner of Georjan Farms Limited
BE IT RESOLVED that:
Moved by Michelle Lynch, seconded by Garry Potter
"That the Committee hereby Grant Provisional Consent for Application 2005-B-
17 subject to the following conditions:
1. That three copies of a Reference Plan for the subject land indicating the
severed parcel be prepared by an Ontario Land Surveyor or a registerable
descriptions be submitted to the Secretary-Treasurer;
2. That the applicant's solicitor prepare and submit a copy of the proposed
conveyance for the parcel severed, for review by the Municipality;
3. That the severed lands be merged in title with the northerly 100 acres and
that the provisions of Subsection 3 or 5 of Section 50 of The Planning Act
apply to any subsequent conveyance or transaction involving the subject
lands;
4. That the applicants solicitor provide an undertaking that the severed lands
and the lands to be enhanced will merge in title;
5. That the applicants satisfy the conditions relating to Consent Application
2005-B-16 ;
6. That all municipal taxes be paid to the Township of Oro-Medonte; and,
7. That the conditions of consent imposed by the Committee be fulfilled
within one year from the date of the giving of the notice.
.....Carried."
Committee of Adjustment-April 14, 2005
Page 8
10:50
David Burgess & Ray Lalande
East Part Lots 111, 112, 113, Plan 589 (Oro)
98 Lakeshore Road East
2005-A-08
In Attendance: Ron McAfee, representing applicants, Gordon Drury, 100
Lakeshore Road E., and Val Morrissey, 6 Oro Road
BE IT RESOLVED thaI:
Moved by Dave Edwards, seconded by Michelle Lynch
"That the Committee hereby approve the portion of Minor Variance Application
2005-A-08 being the permission to expand a legal non-complying structure is
granted for 98 Lakeshore Road East for a 67.44 m2 (726 ft2) half storey addition
to the existing dwelling and that the Committee deny the portion of Minor Variance
Application 2005-A-08 being the permission to obtain relief from the minimum
required rear yard setback of 7.5 metres (24.6 feet) to 2.63 metres (8.62 feet) for
the west side of the dwelling and to 2.02 metres (6.62 feet) for the east side of the
dwelling for the proposed carport and be subject to the following conditions:
1. That the setbacks be in conformity with the dimensions as set out in the
application, sketches and drawings (excluding the carport) submitted with
the application and on the sketch of survey dated July 30, 1986 and
approved by the Committee;
2. That an Ontario Land Surveyor provide verification to the Township of
compliance with the Committee's decision by 1) pinning the footing and 2)
verifying in writing prior to pouring of the foundation so that the dwelling:
a. be no closer than 2.64 metres (8.66 feet) from the interior side yard;
b. be no closer than 5.19 metres (17.03 feet) for the west side of the
dwelling and to 5.06 metres (16.63 feet) for the east side of the
dwelling from the rear yard;
c. be no closer than 2.5 metres (8.2 feet) from the exterior side yard;
3. and so that the detached shed be no closer than 0.24 metres (0.78 feet)
from the rear and interior side yards.
4. That the appropriate building permit be obtained from the Township's
Chief Building Official only after the Committee's decision becomes final
and binding, as provided for within the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P. 13;
and,
5. That the applicants satisfy the comments from Kim Allen, Manager of
Building Services letter dated March 22, 2005.
.....Carried."
Committee of Adjustment-April 14, 2005
Page 9
11:00
John Green
Conc. 2, East Part Lot 18 (Orillia)
727 Woodland Drive
2005-A-09
In Attendance: Mr. John Green, applicant
BE IT RESOLVED that:
Moved by Michelle Lynch, seconded by Dave Edwards
"That the Committee hereby Approve Minor Variance Application 2005-A-09
subject to the following conditions:
1. That prior to issuance of a building permit, an Ontario Land Surveyor
provide verification to the Township of compliance with the Committee's
decision by 1) pinning the footing and 2) verifying in writing prior to pouring
of the foundation by way of surveylreal property report prepared by an
Ontario Land Surveyor;
2. That the setbacks be in conformity with the dimensions as set out in the
application and on the sketch submitted with the application;
3. That the proposed addition be no closer than 4.26 metres (14 feet) from the
front lot line;
4. That the applicant maintain the minimum interior side yard setback of 1.5
metres (4.92 feet) as stated for Exception Two (*2) in Zoning By-law 97-95
as amended for the addition; and,
5. That the appropriate building permit be obtained from the Township's Chief
Building Official only after the Committee's decision becomes final and
binding, as provided for within the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P. 13.
.....Denied."
Moved by Garry Potter, seconded by Dave Edwards
"That the Committee hereby Deny Minor Variance Application 2005-A-09 as the
proposed relief is considered not to be minor in nature
.....Carried."
Committee of Adjustment~ApriI14, 2005
Page 10
11 :10
The Harrison Family Cottage
Plan 1284, Lot 2, Part Block A (Oro)
3055 Ridge Road West
2005-A-10
In Attendance: Mr. Matt Pryce, Prycon Custom Building, representing
applicants
Secretary-Treasurer read letters from Jack Nixon, neighbour, dated April
13,2005 and from Dr. & Mrs. Nixon, neighbour, dated April 12, 2005
verbatim to the Committee members and those present in the audience.
BE IT RESOLVED that:
Moved by Dave Edwards, seconded by Garry Potter
"That the Committee hereby Defer Minor Variance Application 2005-A-10 to
allow the Committee an opportunity to view the proposed locations for the decks
on site and the impact they will have on the natural features of the shoreline.
.....Carried."
Committee of Adjustment-April 14, 2-005
Page 11
11:20
Jim & Asya Giles
Plan M-8, Part Block D (Oro)
8 Oneida Ave.
2005-A-11
-\
In Attendance: Mr. Jim Giles
Secretary-Treasurer read letters from Phillip McGee, 30 Oneida Ave., dated
April 12, 2005, Deborah L. Price, Administrator for Board of Directors,
Indian Park Association, dated April 13, 2005, Ann Budge, 13 Oneida Ave.,
dated April 11, 2005, and from Machiel & Kelly Bakker, 23 Algonquin Trail,
received April 13, 2005 verbatim to the Committee members and those
present in the audience.
BE IT RESOLVED that:
Moved by Dave Edwards, seconded by Michelle Lynch
"That the Committee hereby Defer Minor Variance Application 2005-A-11 to
provide time for the applicants to amend the application to more properly
address the concerns related to the floor area and height.
.....Carried."
Committee of Adjustment-April 14, 2005
Page 12
6. Other Business
I
-1
i. Revise decision for 2004-B-52 (McLean)
Moved by Dave Edwards, seconded by Garry Potter
"That the Committee hereby REVISE Consent Application 2004-B-52 for a lot
depth of 131 metres (430 feet) and a lot area of 1 hectare (2.46 acres) and be
subject to the following conditions:
1. That three copies of a Reference Plan of the subject lands prepared by an
Ontario Land Surveyor be submitted to the Committee Secretary;
2. That the applicant's solicitor prepare and submit a copy of the proposed
conveyance for the parcel severed, for review by the Municipality;
3. That the applicant pay $ 2,000.00 for the lot created as cash-in-lieu of a
parkland contribution;
4. That the applicants verify that the sewage system meets the minimum
required setbacks as per Part 8 of the Ontario Building Code;
5. That the applicant apply for and obtain a re-zoning on the severed land to
accurately reflect the residential land use;
6. Favorable comments from the Roads Department be received for the
severed lot; and,
7. That the conditions of consent imposed by the Committee be fulfilled
within one year from the date of the giving of the notice.
.
.....Carried."
ii. Adoption of minutes for March 10, 2005 Meeting
Moved by Dave Edwards, Seconded by Michelle Lynch
"That the minutes for the March 10th 2005 Meeting be adopted as printed
and circulated
...Carried."
Committee of Adjustment-April 14, 2005
Page 13
7. Adiournment
~
Moved by Garry Potter, Seconded by Michelle Lynch
"We do now adjourn at 3:20 p.m."
C . d"
'" arne.
(NOTE: A tape of this meeting is available for review.)
Chairperson,
Allan Johnson
Secretary-Treasurer,
Andy Karaiskakis
Committee of Adjustment-April 14,2005
Page 14
RECEIVED
Mayor and Council
The Corporation of the Township ofOro-Medonte
P.O. Box 100
Oro, ON LOL 2XO
APR 2 6 2005
ORO-MEDONTE
TOWNSHIP
Re: 727 Woodland Drive
Minor Variance Application Denial
Application #2005-A-09
I am the owner and permanent resident of a shoreline property located at 727 Woodland
Drive. I have owned this property for three years and my family has owned a cottage at
735 Woodland Drive since 1947.
I recently contacted the Township Planning Department and with the assistance of Andy
Karaiskakis, Junior Planner, I submitted an application for a minor variance to allow the
extension of an existing attached structure to my home to create a garage. The
application requests relief from the minimwn required front yard setback of 7.5 metres
(24.6 feet) for a shoreline property, to a proposed setback of 4.26 metres (14 feet).
Attached is the Township Planning Report for the requested variance signed by Mr.
Karaiskakis and Andria Leigh, Planning Consultant. The planning report describes the
four tests ofthe minor variance and determines that:
. The variance conforms with the intent of the Official Plan
. The variance conforms with the general intent of the Zoning By-law
. The variance is appropriate for the desirable development of the lot
. The variance is minor
On April 14, 2005 a hearing was held regarding my variance application. A copy of the
Notice of Hearing and sketch of the proposed structure and setback is attached. Despite
the conclusions of the Planning Report and the fact that there was no opposition to the
variance request, the Committee of Adjustment voted to deny the request on the grounds
that "the proposed relief is not considered to be minor in nature".
I am electing to appeal this decision to the Ontario Municipal Board for the following
reasons:
. The attached Planning Report recommends approval of the variance
. There are numerous other homes and garages in the immediate area that encroach
upon the specified 7.5 metre (24.6 feet) setback
. There have been variances granted for similar requests in the area including:
. 251 Moon Point Drive reducing the setback to 2 metres (6.6 feet)
. 137 Moon Point Drive reducing the setback to 6.37 metres (21 feet)
. 110 Moon Point Drive reducing the setback to less than 15 feet.
. Homes loeated at 731 Woodland Drive (two doors south) and 741 Woodland Drive (7
doors south) have garages within 3 metres (10 feet) of the front lot line and both
structures are significantly wider than the structure proposed for my property
. There was no public opposition to my variance request
. There is no justification provided as to why the variance is not deemed minor
. The Committee of Adjustment vote was split
In light ofthe above facts, I am confident that the Ontario Municipal Board will overrule
the Committee of Adjustment decision. I am respectfully requesting that Council
consider appropriate action to avoid the time, expense and inconvenience required by all
parties should a Municipal Board hearing be necessary.
~#~
//
.//
t/ John W. Green
727 Woodland Dr.
Orillia, ON L3V 6HI
Copy to: Township Clerk
attachments
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
PO Box 100. Oro. ON. LOL 2XO. (705)-4SU 17 J
NOTICE OF HEARING
IN THE MATTER OF Section 45 of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990 c. P. 13
-and -
IN THE MATTER of an application for a minor variance, Submission No. 200S-A-09
AN APPLICATION BY:
John Green
LOCATION OF PROPERTY:
Cone. 2, East Part Lot 18 (Former Township of Orillia)
727 Woodland Drive
PURPOSE OF APPLICATION:
The applicant is proposing to extend the existing attached garage by a 18. I m' (195 ft') addition at the ITont of the garage and is
requesting relief of the fol1owing provision ITom Zoning By-law 97 -95:
1. Setback ITom the minimum required ITont vard of7.5 metres (24.6 feet) to a proposed 4.26 metres (14 feet) for the
proposed addition.
THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT HEREBY APPOINTS Thursday the 14th day of April, 2005, at the hour of
11 :00 a.m. in the Oro-Medonte Township Municipal Building in the Council Chambers, for the hearing of al1 persons who
desire to be heard in support of or in opposition to the application.
You are entitled to attend this public hearing in person to express your views about this application or you may be represented
by counsel for that purpose. If you are aware of any person interested in or affected by this application who has not received a
copy of this notice you are requested to inform that person of this hearing. If you wish to make written comments on this
application they may be forwarded to the Secretary of the Committee at the address shown above. If a person or public body
that files an appeal of a decision of the Committee of Adjustment in respect of the proposed minor variance does not make
written submissions to the Committee of Adjustment before it gives or refuses to give an approval, the Ontario Municipal Board
may dismiss the appeal.
FAILURE TO ATTEND HEARING - If you do not attend the hearing it may proceed in your absence and, except as
otherwise provided in the Planning Act, you win not be entitled to any further notice in the proceedings. The applicant(s) must
attend this hearing or be represented by an authorized agent.
NOTICE OF DECISION - If you wish to be notified of the decision of the Township of Oro-Medonte in respect of this
application, you must submit a written request to the Township of Oro-Medonte. This wil1 also entitle you to be advised of a
possible Ontario Municipal Board Hearing. Even if you are the successful party, you should request a copy of the decision
since the Township of Oro-Medonte decision may be appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board by the applicant or another
member of the pubhc,
Dated at the Township ofOro-Medonte this 4'h day of Apri12005,
Andy Karaiskakis,
Secrelmy- Treasurer
;~; :; :'; '~
Ni, '
.
o
~% );'~
"'" Ri;;
(j\ &. ~I:j
g "%
~i; t~
t'r1 x~", ~ :~
~~~, ~~
~ lB
~ ~ 1;)
~
'-
o
o
~
f:..,
o
"Y
;;Iv..
~~
n,
[hIS
'--'
",,,
~:': "
'"
",
~
~
o
o
4;
G
~
o
G
'b
'-.,
i ~:
"
..
I
,
j
LEGEND
i~
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE
NOTES
.,.'i':,'Aihi,':ASfRONOMI(>oUiJVEO FROM THE rmRTHERLY liMn Of IN$T. T9057~ HAVING A
,,,,.,,,,,,,." ".o-.e,,",,'nrt'oJJ,' AC:", c:L!n....... "'''''" A: P! AN nF <:;IIRVFY RY fJfARDEN &. STANTON LTD.
5'8
5518
-DENOTES STANOARD IRON BAR
-DENOTES SHORT STANDARD IRON 8AR
I CER'iiFY'THAJ:
1) THIS SU~VEY AND PLAN,,IJIE CQRRECT AND IN ACCORDANCE
,. -_._..,,~"'~,,-'
,DClAnDUI
'.I-A!!d)tJ!l!
,::1'>> ,..."
''1iol!
.c,.:",,:.:....O:!Le::iik:1
Township of Oro-Medonte
Committee of Adjustment
Planning Report for
April 14, 2005
John Green
200S-A-09
727 Woodland Drive, Concession 2, East Part Lot 18 (Oro)
THE PROPOSAL
The applicant is proposing to extend the existing attached garage with a 18.1 m2 (195 If) addition at
the front of the garage and is requesting relief of the following provision from Zoning By-law 97-95: .
i. Setback from the minimum required front vard of 7.5 metres (24.6 feet) to a proposed 4.26
metres (14 feet) for the proposed addition.
MUNICIPAL POLtCY, ZONING AND PREVtOUS APPROVALS
Official Plan Designation - Shoreline
Zoning By-law 97-95 - Shoreline Residential Exception (SR'2) Zone
Previous Applications -
AGENCY COMMENTS (space is provided for the Committee to make notes)
Simcoe County
Public Works and Roads-
Building Department-The Township Building Dept. has reviewed this application and note that the
proposal appears to meet the minimum standards.
Engineering Department - No concerns
PLANNING FRAMEWORK
Background
The subject property has a lot frontage of approximately 12. 3 metres (40.5 feet), a lot depth of
approximately 49.7 metres (163 feet), a shoreline frontage of approximately 16.2 metres (53 feet)
and a lot area of approximately 663 m' (7137 ft'). The applicant proposes to extend the attached
garage with a 18.1 m' (195 ft') addition at the front of the garage. The proposed addition would be
located 4.26 metres (14 feet) from the front lot line.
The Four Tests of the Minor Variance
Does the variance conform with the general intent of the Official Plan?
The property is designated Shoreline. The permitted uses on lands designated Shoreline are
single detached dwellings, home occupations and open space uses. The proposed variance,
which would permit the extension of the existing garage attached to the dwelling closer to the
front lot line would be in keeping with the intent of the Official Plan.
Does the variance conform with the general intent of the Zoning By-law?
One of the purposes of maintaining minimum front yards in the Shoreline Residential Zone is to
maintain and protect the character of the residential community. However, it is also the intent of
the By-law to permit adequate parking area for vehicles in a residential area. Given that the
existing attached garage is not of an adequate size to store a vehicle and the lot is somewhat
constrained given its size and the location of the existing dwelling, the proposed variance is
considered to conform with the spirit and intent of the Zoning By-law.
Is the variance appropriate for the desirable development of the lot?
The subject application has been precipitated to some degree by the existing location of the
house. Based on a site inspection the proposed addition, although located very close to the road,
should not detract from the character of the lot or the surrounding neighbourhood. On this basis,
the subject variance should provide for the appropriate and desirable development of the lot.
Is the variance minor?
On the basis that the existing garage and proposed addition is buffered by a cedar hedge located
along the property line adjacent to 729 Woodland Drive, and given that the proposed addition will
not be out of character with the surrounding residential lots, the requested relief is deemed to be
minor.
CONCLUSIONS
The proposed variance generally satisfies the 4 tests of a minor variance as reviewed above.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Committee approve Minor Variance Application 2005-A-09 subject to
the following conditions;
1. That prior to issuance of a building permit, an Ontario Land Surveyor provide verification to
the Township of compliance with the Committee's decision by 1) pinning the footing and 2)
verifying in writing prior to pouring of the foundation by way of survey/real property report
prepared by an Ontario Land Surveyor;
2. That the setbacks be in conformity with the dimensions as set out in the application and on
the sketch submitted with the appiication;
3. That the proposed addition be no closer than 4.26 metres (14 feet) from the front lot line;
4. That the applicant maintain the minimum interior side yard setback of 1.5 metres (4.92 feet)
as stated for Exception Two ('2) in Zoning By-law 97-95 as amended for the addition; and,
5. That the appropriate building permit be obtained from the Township's Chief Building Official
only after the Committee's decision becomes final and binding, as provided for within the
Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P. 13.
All of which is respectfully submitted,
Reviewed by,
A~
Andy Karaiskakis
Junior Planner
----1J ~0-1
Andria Leigh MCIP, RPP
Planning Consultant
.'
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
P.O. BOX 100, ORO, ONTARIO, LOL2XO
(705) 487-2171
COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
NOTICE OF DECISION
Application No. 200S-A-09
IN THE MATTER OF Section 45 of The Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.P. 13 as amended; and
IN THE MA TTER OF the Official Plan of the Township of Oro-Medonte; and
IN THE MATTER OF Comprehensive Zoning By-law 97-95, as it applies to the particular
application; and
IN THE MATTER OF Application 2005-A-09 submitted by John Green, owner of Concession
2, East Pat1 Lot 18 (former Township of Orillia); and
WHEREAS The applicant is proposing to extend the existing attached garage with a 18.1 m2 (195
ft2) addition at the front of the garage and is requesting relief of the following provision from
Zoning By-Jaw 97-95:
i. Setback from the minimum required front vard of7.5 metres (24.6 feet) to a proposed 4.26
metres (14 feet) for the proposed addition.
WHEREAS the subject property is designated "Shoreline" in the Official Plan, and Zoned
"Shoreline Residential Exception (SR*2)" under By-Jaw 97-95; and
WHEREAS having had regard to those matters addressed by The Planning Act, in accordance
with the rules and procedures prescribed under Ontario Regulation 200/96, as amended, and
having considered all relevant information as presented at the public hearing on the 14th day of
April, 2005.
PAGE#2
APPLICATION 2005-A-09
COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT DECISION
BE IT RESOLVED that:
Moved by Michelle Lynch, seconded by Dave Edwards
"That the Committee hereby Approve Minor Variance Application 2005-A-09 subject to the
following conditions:
I. That prior to issuance of a building permit, an Ontario Land Surveyor provide verification
to the Township of compliance with the Committee's decision by I) pinning the footing and
2) verifying in writing prior to pouring of the foundation by way of survey/real property
report prepared by an Ontario Land Surveyor;
2. That the setbacks be in confonnity with the dimensions as set out in the application and on
the sketch submitted with the application;
3. That the proposed addition be no closer than 4.26 metres (14 feet) from the front lot line;
4. That the applicant maintain the minimum interior side yard setback of 1.5 metres (4.92 feet)
as stated for Exception Two (*2) in Zoning By-law 97-95 as amended for the addition; and,
5. That the appropriate building pennit be obtained from the Township's Chief Building
Official only after the Committee's decision becomes final and binding, as provided for
within the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P. 13.
.. ...Denied."
Moved by Garry Potter, seconded by Dave Edwards
"That the Committee hereby Deny Minor Variance Application 2005-A-09 as the proposed relief
is considered not to be minor in nature
.. ...Carried."
Additional infonnation regarding this Application is available for public inspection at the
Township of Oro-Medonte Administration Centre, 148 Line 7 South in Oro Station, Ontario,
Monday to Friday, between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m.
d '
PAGE #3
APPLICATION 200S.A-09
COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT DECISION
TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to Section 53(19) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.P. 13, as
amended, the above decision and/or conditions may be appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board.
Only individuals, corporations and public bodies may appeal decisions in respect of applications
for consent to the Ontario Municipal Board. A notice of appeal may not be filed by an
unincorporated association or group. However, a notice of appeal may be filed in the name of an
individual who is a member of the association or group.
THE LAST DATE FOR FILING A NOTICE OF APPEAL IS WEDNESDAY, THE 4th
DA Y OF MAY, 2005.
A "NOTICE OF APPEAL" setting out in writing the supporting reasons for the appeal should be
received on or before the last date for "Appeal" accompanied by a cheque in the amount of ONE
HUNDRED AND TWENTY FIVE DOLLARS payable to the MINISTRY OF FINANCE. The
notice is to be submitted to the Secretary -Treasurer of the Committee of Adjustment, PO Box
100, Oro, Ontario, LOL 2XO.
Members concurring in this decision:
/~
AUan John
Chairman)
Dave Edwards
Garry Potter
Lynda Aiken
MicheUe Lynch
~
/
DATED this 14th day of April 2005.
)I(~
'" \
Andy Karaiskakis, Hons. B.A.,
Secretary-Treasurer
Committee of Adjustment
~~-\
Dept. Report No. BD2005-08 To: Committee of the Whole Prepared By: Ronald M Kolbe
Director of Building & Bylaw
Enforcement
Subject: Pfrimmer Department:
Council Property Re: 2034 Ridge Rd. Building & Bylaw Enforcement
& Line 2
C. ofW. Date: April 21, 2005
Motion # R.M. File #:
Date: RolI#:
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
REPORT
II BACKGROUND:
II
The property located at 2034 Ridge Rd. & Line 2 contains numerous temporary tent structures not
regulated by the Township of Oro-Medonte zoning bylaw or the Clean & Clear bylaw. In an
attempt to address neighbors and council concerns a site meeting with the owner Mr. Pfrimmer
(owner) was undertaken on 4 February 2005. Present were Township staff The CAO, The
Director of Building & Bylaw Enforcement and the Junior Planner. The Director of Fire and
Emergency Services was requested to inspect the site for conformance with the Ontario Fire
Regulations.
Numerous options were discussed with Mr. Pfrimmer and summarized in the attachment prepared
by the Junior Planner Andy Karaiskakis.
The following options are detailed as follows:
>- if owner to constructs a second storey addition or roof alignment of the existing garage without
the requirement of a minor variance in accordance with the Ontario Building Code, additional
storage could result in the removal of some tent structures.
>- If the owner constructs a carport on the Ridge Road side, the result may also result in the
removal of some tent structures.
>- If owner were to continue wooden fence along west property line to the Ridge Rd. east for a
short distance this option might eliminate some of the visual concerns.
The contents of Mr. Karaiskakis's recommendations were communicated to Mr. Pfrimmer for his
review and voluntary action (see attached).
Also a follow-up site visit was conducted by Deputy CBO Mike Diver q,n 14 April 2005 and
confirmed the following:
1. No concern with the Clean & Clear Bylaw.
2. There are no discarded building materials on site. (see attached report by Inspector Mike
Diver).
3. Mr. Pfrimmer has acted on some suggestions provided by respective departments
Administration, Building, Fire & Zoning to the concerns expressed by ratepayers & council.
4. There is NO Municipal Bylaw that deals with tent structures of that size.
5. There are NO Ontario Building Code requirements for tents of that size.
6. I believe the OPP visited site and may have expressed no concerns with sightlines.
C\ '0 _ ~
In summary this property is in general conformance with Township Bylaws.
The department heads intend to re-visits the Clean and Clear By-law, Licensing for commercial
properties and the prohibited uses section of the Township of Oro-Medonte zoning by-law.
II RECOMMENDATION(S):
II
It is recommended that:
1. THAT Report No. BD2005-08 be received.
Respectfully submitted,
KdV-
-6
Ronald M. Kolbe, CBCO, AScT, MAATO
D ~uY-'
- 2 -
Ccfj ~JeN)
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
9b~ /1)
FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL SHEET
TO:
FROM:
Mr. Rae Pfummer
Andy Karaiskakis
COMPANY:
DATE:
3/30/2005
Fl'l.X NUMBER:
TOTAL NO. OF PAGES, INCLUDJNG COVER:
722-8302
3
PHONE NUMBER:
SENDER'S REFERENCE NUMBER:
728-7587
RE:
YOUR REFERENCE NUMBER:
Memo re: opcions
o URGENT
o FOR REVJEW
o PLEASE COMMENT
o PLEASE REPLY
o PLEASE RECYCLE
NOTES/COMMENTS:
Rae,
Please find enclosed the memo regarding the various opcions as discussed during the site
inspeccion. Please be aware that a fence can be constructed along the property line or on your
side of the lot line, prm~ded that the fence does not e.xceed 6 ft in height. One opcion that was
brought up during the site inspeccion was to seccion off the corner of your lot with the fence in an
'1,' fonnacion. Should you have further quescions, please don't hesitate to contact our offices.
Regards,
Andy
Jf any page~ are missing or incomplete" pJease call: 705-487-2171 or fax: 487-0133
This message is intended only for the m.e of the individual or entity to wruch it is addressed and may contain infonnation that is privileged,
confidential and exempt from disclosure under the applicabJc 1m\'. Thank you.
ADMJNJSTH..r\TJON CENTRE
148 LINE 7 SOUTH, BOX 100
ORO, ON LOL 2XO
1'7054872171
F 705-487.() 13:1
Cib _ ~
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
II
MEMORANDUM
~
To: Ron Kolbe, Chief Building Official, Jennifer Zieleniewski, Chief Administrative Officer
cc:
From:
Andy Karaiskakis, Junior Planner
R.M. File #:
Date:
April 26, 2004
RolI#:
010-007-05100
Subject: Pfrimmer lot options
The purpose of this memo is to recommend various options that were discussed during the site visit
which was conducted by Township officials on Friday February 4, 2005 at 2034 Ridge Road West.
Option 1:
Enlarge the existing detached garage by increasing the height to the Zoning By-law maximum
requirement of 4.5 metres (14.7 feet), This enlargement cannot be constructed within the required
rear yard and interior side yard setback requirements of 2 metres (6.5 feet) from the property lines.
The height is calculated, as defined by Zoning By-law 97-95 as, "in case of a structure with no roof,
the highest point of the said slructure," "the mean level between eaves and ridge of a gabled, hip or
gambrel roof or other type of pitched roof" or "the deckline of a mansard roof'. Attached is Appendix
2 of Zoning By-law 97-95 which indicates how to calculate the height of the building with various roof
types.
Option 2:
An unenclosed addition (carport) to be attached to the dwelling and located at the portion of the
dwelling facing Ridge Road. As Ridge Road is a County Road, Mr. Pfrimmer is required to contact
the County of Simcoe Roads and Engineering Department to determine that the proposed addition
would conform with the County of Simcoe Setback By-law. Attached is the County of Simcoe Setback
By-law.
Option 3:
An addition to the front of the existing detached garage would have to comply with the required
exterior side yard setback for detached accessory buildings being Line 2 of 4.5 metres (14.7 feet)
and must comply with the interior and rear yard setbacks of 2 metres (6.5 feet), as well as the
maximum height requirement of 4.5 metres (14.7 feet). In addition, the maximum floor area for the
detached garage cannot exceed 70 square metres (753 square feet).
.
These options have been brought forward to assist Mr. Pfrimmer in alleviating some of the outdoor
storage on his lot by adding additional storage space.
Respectfully Submitted,
q f'-
I ~ ')
Andy Karaiskakis, Hons. SA
Junior Planner
- 2 -
ORO.MEDONTE
Building Inspection Department
REPORT OF INSPECTION
ORO, P.O. BOX 100
ONTARIO LOL 2XO
TEL: (705) 487-2171 C;L I ~
FAX: (705) 487-0133 \D-W
lliJIf: Inspections can
be cailed in
after hours
flEPUIT NO. B'-IL.;>rvJ
,M:X)~ ' 7 <:;"
DATE: p...{JR I L-/4jO<)INSPECTION: <'/TE-
TIME IN q; 41- TIME OUT It)) 6 cr
TAKE NOTICE: that you are required to comply with the following order(s):
~.
'I(>,l.
/ J1/jG-E 4"
0OO3@0
G
~
-.
ocx:>:,99
0003801
I
CbO 0-
lYE c...~ nA 'T7 tJ F
.vr Rib G-f'
, . $
ISt-\~1)
U)NCA~- g l..oc.j{ <;, ihJ!) e-.AfJS'. ALeNe-- UT u,JE
RJ':>, 1.%.JCff1...vJ <;, fflCic..;::...l) R fe, HlIJt:, FS1J 0E.. B F S,;I)F
C; '-{ >J D~ sTE J.11tJ"""""Eft, L
A c-t ~~ 6 rJ iP.A1 - R. .'
(XX) .~
Cb?
Dr A1
oi-J
of
. <: .
(...
L-11J €..
(SBtfllJh
CtX>3q~l
So . . ".r ,oW,U' . 'ft> V1::J(., I F<(
~L S ~t
71fE. 5 J'b-1.E. ~, P IL-&J.::> ~u-r . ~s. fl~'t ~It
- v L.
I II FE4J gl()C...t(. So (4-') 4-{1 pe..4fL'77:> hE- D.0 Ttf1Z G-f2o vi. JJ/:::. 'bf2.'.>/D€.
I
i II- T1l..M LF R. _ T1f-s se. /5/..()C-I<:..S A-fl.e. O,d -m P fJ F .+ S z.::t 0 r=
. I (j-.MU>t;;,u 'rflAc::rof1.. /'" scS . 1:>0 /JoT !tfrPffFtR.... m f:>E- r:..;M:7C..h'+J""'E.lUAL_
O(,'X):,cjl - (j) PIj1J/S. DF G-Llt-S5 i3 ESIDE.. ASH HV\T - vt'-'A-BLE TO vEIL, P<t I'F wf>PTE HP\1t::1C.'''L
NOTE: A request for Reinspection is Required .
Received By:
Inspector:
,
I
I
Dept. Report No. BD2005-07 To: Committee of the Whole Prepared By: Kim Allen
Manger of Building Services
Subject: Department:
Council RE: Pit Bull Le~islation Bill 132 Building & Bylaw Enforcement
(amendment to the Dog Owner's
C. ofW. Liability Act come into errect August 29, Date: April 21, 2005
2005.)
Motion # R.M. File #:
Date: RolI#:
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
REPORT
II BACKGROUND:
It
RE: Pit Bull Le!!islation Bill 132
(amendment to the Dog Owner's Liability Act come into effect August 29, 2005.)
The OSPCA's was requested to appear as a deputation to Council on April 13,2005. Mr. Mike Draper
appeared on behalf of the OSPCA and outlined, the OSPCA's interpretation of the Legislation and also the
following:
I. The enforcement of the Legislation would be difficult since there is no clear definition of what
constitutes a Pit Bull.
2. The ownership of Pit Bulls will be restricted. Existing Pit Bulls are allowed with restrictions.
3. A veterinarian would not classify a Pit Bull.
4. Enforcement costs would be passed on to the Township ofOro-Medonte.
5. The current Animal Control contract with the OSPCA does not include a quote for the impending
Legislation.
6. Separately, a Animal Care Bylaw was suggested by the OSPCA which will addressed under separate
cover.
II Analysis:
~
I. Actual prosecution costs are already borne by the Township ofOro-Medonte as detailed in the OSPCA
Animal Control agreement.
2. Thc Township ofOro-Medonte has acquired the resources ofa local veterinarian to assist in any
problcms associated with the enforcement of the Legislation.
3. The existing dog tag registration system while already able to track pit bulls has been modified to
address thc variations of pit bull cross type dogs.
4. The Legislation allows for prosecution under a Part 3 Summons and the ability to seek larger fines to a
maximum of $1 0,000.00 plus numerous remedies including jail sentences up to 6 months similar to
Ontario Building Code offences.
Under the revised Dog Owners Liability Act (DOLA) the Ministry of the Attorney General issued the
following comment in relation to conflicts with Municipal Bylaws.
"The new section 11 of DOL A will provide that if there is a conflict between the provincial requirements and
a municipal by-law, the more restrictive provisions in relation to pit bulls will prevail".
Summarv
The new Legislation will not affect the current costs of enforcement with regards to the current service
provide.
~I RECOMMENDA TION(S):
II
It is recommended that:
I. THAT Report No. BD2005-07 be received.
RespectfuIJy submitted,
Kim AIJen
Manager of Building Services
(JJJ-.../
~u--f l c\o
. 1'5n)\ b '
~r
- 2 -