04 13 2005 COW Agenda
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING AGENDA
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
DATE: WEDNESDAY, APRIL 13, 2005 TIME: 9:00 a.m.
1. NOTICE OF ADDITIONS TO AGENDA
2. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA
3. DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST AND THE GENERAL NATURE
THEREOF: - "IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ACT"
4. DEPUTATIONS:
a) 9:00 a.m. Michael Draper, Chief Inspector, Ontario Society for the Prevention of
Cruelty to Animals (OSPCA), re: Bill 132 and Draft Animal Care By-Law.
5. CORRESPONDENCE:
a) Tim Crooks, correspondence dated March 21, 2005 re: Drainage.
b) R. Kelly, Chair, Community Task Force for Physician Recruitment, correspondence
dated March 17,2005 re: Member/Council Appointment Request (from March 16,2005
meeting).
c) Gail Dumais, Liaison, Autism Society Ontario, Simcoe County Chapter, correspondence
dated March 2, 2005 re: Proclamation Request, "Taanie far Autism Day", April 29, 2005.
d) John Gerretsen, Minister Responsible for Seniors, correspondence dated March 10,
2005 re: Proclamation Request, "Seniars'Mantti', June, 2005.
e) Tony Derro, Secretary, The Association of Municipal Tax Collectors of Ontario,
correspondence dated March 9,2005 re: Current Value Assessment (CVA) Taxation,
Proposed Resolution.
6. FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND FIRE:
a) Report No. TR 2005-09, Bonnie McPhee, Accounting Clerk, re: Statement of Accounts,
March, 2005.
b) Report No. FD 2005-09, Joe Casey, Director of Fire and Emergency SeNices, re: Fire
Report for Month of February, 2005.
c) Report No. FD 2005-08, Joe Casey, Director of Fire and Emergency SeNices, re: City
of Barrie Fire Department Agreement for Dispatching Township of Oro-Medonte Fire
and Emergency SeNices.
d) Chris Carter, Manager of Recreation and Community SeNices, re: Applications for
Grant/Subsidy, Requests to Waive Rental Fees, Oro District Lions Club; Barrie Amateur
Radio Club.
e) Jennifer Zieleniewski, CAO, re: Ontario Provincial Police, Information Request
(proposed questions be to be distributed at the meeting).
7. PUBLIC WORKS:
None.
8. ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES:
a) Report No. EES 2005-18, Keith Mathieson, Director of Engineering and Environmental
SeNices, re: Timothy Pierce and Shelley Motz - Site Plan Agreement - Lot 16, Plan
1464 (3 Mazepa Place - Ukrainian Village) - Being all of PIN #58561-0062 (Lt) - Roll
#4346-010-011-15600-0000.
9. BUILDING, PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT:
a) Report No. PD 2005-025, Nick McDonald, Planner, re: Craighurst Secondary Plan
(Trow Report under separate cover).
b) Report No. PD 2005-026, Andria Leigh, Planner, re: Removal of Holding Provision - 3
Mazepa Place, Concession 11, Plan 1464, Lot 76 (Oro), Township of Oro-Medonte
[Pierce].
c) Report No. BD 2005-06, Ron Kolbe, Director of Building and By-Law Enforcement, re:
Building Report, January - March, 2005.
10. IN-CAMERA:
None.
11. ADJOURNMENT:
2
. ,
ADDENDUM
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING
Wednesday, April 13, 2005
7. PUBLIC WORKS
a) Report No. PW 2005.03, Jerry Ball, Public Works Superintendent, re: 2005 Grader
Lease.
10. IN-CAMERA:
a) Jennifer Zieleniewski, re: Legal Matter.
, . . ....."
. '+ Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
N('{}!!U'
i<1< _, \;C"\!~L\i',L,c. r.)'\. i_'-~\' ~\Vj
i ~r)( i)n~ j 0~'-LX(,43
/' ,., j)",!")\,',J.<n',_(',
P1GtccHng animals since i 873
February 16, 2005
Mr. Kim Allen RECEIVED
Manager of Building Services
Township of Oro-Medonte
148 Line 7 South FE8 2 ] 2005
Box 100
Oro, ON LOL 2XO ORO-MEDONTE
TOWNSHIP
Dear Mr. Allen:
This letter is in response to your request regarding a proposed Animal Care By-Law, and
how the provincial legislation Bill 132 will effect the municipality and the Ontario SPCA.
Animal Care By-Law
The Ontario SPCA is asking the municipality to consider passing a bylaw provision to provide
. protection to animals. Similar bylaws exist in numerous municipalities across Ontario
including Orangeville, Stratford, Innisfil, Richmond Hill, Vaughan, Toronto, Markham, Aurora,
Ottawa, Mississauga and the Township of Mono.
The Care of Animals component contain provisions relating to:
. proper shelter and sanitary conditions
. proper food, water, veterinary care and attention
. securing or fastening of animals
. proper ventilation (i.e. leaving a dog in a hot car)
. abusing and tormenting animals
This will enable OSPCA enforcement staff to more effectively deal with animal care related
complaints in the city such as; dogs housed without shelter, unsanitary conditions in back
yards, the slaughtering of animals in residential areas and leaving a dog in a hot car in the
summer. Many of these issues are not criminal in nature; therefore there are currently no
penalties for this type of behavior. With the enactment of a municipal bylaw the OSPCA can
adequately respond to complaints regarding irresponsible animal ownership.
This new section of the bylaw, if passed, would be enforced at no cost to the municipality, as
this is part of the OSPCA's mission. I have included a draft bylaw and set fine schedule for
your information.
Bill 132
Bill 132 is will amend the Dog Owners Liability Act, at the time of writing it has been ordered
. for third reading in the Legislative Assembly, and is expected to be passed. The bill is
supported by the Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO). The OSPCA has been told
that municipalities will be responsible for the general enforcement of this statute.
, '
. The bill strengthens the Dog Owners Liability Act in a number of ways, and creates new
search and seizure provisions, allowing peace officers, including municipal law enforcement
officer to seize dogs that pose a danger to public safety. It further creates a number of new
offences and clarifies what conditions a Justice of the Peace can place on a dog owner, if his
or her dogs has bitten or attacked. The general improvements in the Act are well written and
will assist in dealing with aggressive dogs.
The bill also unfortunately will restrict the ownership of pitbulls, whether the dog is
aggressive or not, punishing the whole breed for the irresponsible action of a few
irresponsible owners. According to statistics gathered from London Animal Control German
shepherds and Labrador retrievers bite more people.
The bill has a very broad definition of pitbull and will encompass purebred Canadian Kennel
Club registered dogs, as well as dogs that most people would not consider a "pitbull". There
is no DNA test to determine if a dog is, or is not a pitbull.
The bill creates a class of pitbulls called "restricted pitbulls", which is any pitbull that currently
resides in Ontario. These dogs may be kept by their owners, but must be spayed or
neutered, and muzzled when off the owner's property, Further the bill prohibits the keeping of
any pitbull which is not a restricted pitbull, therefore no one can acquire a new pitbull.
There will be a significant cost to the municipality in enforcing the Dog Owners Liability Act.
The OSPCA did not quote for this increased enforcement related costs in the recent contract
negotiations. Council should be aware of the significant increase in enforcement and
. prosecution costs with the proposed legislation. If the bill passes into law, it is hard to
estimate the additional workload but it is expected to be significant.
If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. I would be happy to
speak to council on either matter if necessary.
s;"'~
//:
/" C,' -'
Michael Draper
Chief Inspector
cc: Ben Galley, A/Regionallnspector - OSPCA
Mary Sinclair, Branch Manager - OSPCA
Tom Molley - Operations Assistant - OSPCA
Enclosures: Bill 132
Draft Animal Care Bylaw
.
-
. Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte
BY-LAW No.
A BY-LAW RESPECTING ANIMALS
WHEREAS the Municipal Act, 2001 5.0.2001
authorizes a lower tier municipality to pass by-laws
respecting animals; therefore
The Council of the Township of Oro-Medonte
HEREBY ENACTS as follows:
THIS BY-LAW SHALL BE KNOWN AS THE
"ANIMAL CARE BY-LAW"
PART I
INTERPRETATION
1. In this by-law,
"animal" has the same definition as provided in section
. 104 of the Municipal Act 2001.
"Municipality" means the Corporation of the Township of
Oro-Medonte.
PART II
CARE OF ANIMALS
2. Every person who is the owner or has custody or
control of an animal within the Municipality's boundaries
shall provide the animal or cause it to be provided with
adequate and appropriate care, food, water, shelter,
exercise, attention and veterinary care as may be required
to meet the needs of the species.
3. (1) If a dog is customarily kept out of doors, the owner
or person having the custody or control of the dog shall
provide for its use at all times a structurally sufficient,
weather-proofed and insulated enclosure of appropriate
size and dimension.
(2) No person who owns or has custody or control of a
. dog may cause a dog to be hitched, tied
. . .
. or fastened to a fixed object where a choke collar or choke
chain forms part of the securing apparatus, or where a
rope or cord is tied directly around the dog's neck.
4. (1) No person who is the owner or person having
custody or control of any animal in the Municipality shall
tether the animal on a chain, rope or similar restraining
device of less than three (3) metres in length.
(2) Every person who owner or has custody or control of
an animal shall ensure that an animal that is tethered has
umestricted movement within the range of the tether, and
that the animal cannot suffer injury resulting from the
tethering.
5. (1) No person who owns or custody or control of an
animal, shall keep an animal within the Municipality in an
unsanitary condition.
(2) For the purposes of subsection (1), an animal is
kept in an unsanitary condition where the keeping of the
animal results in an accumulation of faecal matter, an
. odour, insect infestation or rodent attractants which
endanger the health of any person or animal, or which
disturbs or is likely to disturb the enjoyment, cornfort or
convenience of any person.
6. No person may cause an animal to be confined in
an enclosed space, including a car, without adequate
ventilation.
7. No person shall:
(a) abandon an animal which he or she owns;
(b) abuse or torment an animal;
(c) train a dog to fight with another animal;
PART III
OFFENCES
8. (1) Any person who contravenes any provision of this
. by-law is guilty of an offence.
(2) In addition to any other remedy and to any penalty
~.
. imposed by the court in which a conviction has been
entered, and any court of competent jurisdiction thereafter,
may make an order prohibiting the continuation or
repetition of the offence by the person convicted.
9. This by-law comes into force on
Read a first, second and third time and ENACTED
AND PASSED this day of ,A.D. .
DRAFT SET FINE SCHEDULE
Column 1 Column 2 Column 3
Item Short F 01111 Wording Offence Creating Set Fine
Provision (includingooslS)
~_,~^~"_,^~~____~""=_~~~,"^.,.,_.._.^,_~.w~,ww~."m'_ ~_._,__._,_._._,^,_~_ _"._W",~.__'.~_~___
I. Failure to provide animal with adequate and appropriate care 2 $155,00
2, Failure to provide animal with adequate and appropriate food 2 $t55,OO
. 3, Failure to provide anima! with adequate and appropriate water 2 $155,00
4, Failure to provide animal with adequate and appropriate shelter 2 $155,00
5, Failure to provide animal with adequate and appropriate exercise 2 $155,00
6, Failure to provide animal with adequate and appropriate attention 2 $155,00
7, Failure to provide animal with adequate and appropriate veterinary attention 2 $155,00
8, Fail to provide for a dog a suitable outdoor enclosure 3(1) $155,00
9, Unlawfully tie dog with rope or chain directly around dog's neck 3(2) $t55,OO
10, Keeping an animal on a chain, rope or restraining device les than 3 metres long 4(1) $155,00
II. Failure to ensure tethered animal has unrestricted movement 4(2) $155,00
12, Keep an animal in unsanitary manner 5(1) $155.00
13, Confine an animal without appropriate ventilation 6 $155,00
14, Abandon animal 7(a) $305,00
15, Abuse or tonnent an animal 7(b) $305,00
16, Train a dog to fight another animal 7(c,) $305,00
Note: The penalty provision for the offences indicated above is section 61 of the Provincial Offences Act RSO 1990, c. P.33.
.
sect jon_I ' Page 1 of 1
Bill 132, Public Safety Related to Dogs Statute Law Amendment
Act, 200s/Loi de 2005 modifiant des lois en ce qui concerne la
securite publique relative aux chiens. Hon, Mr. Bryant (Attorney
General). First Reading October 26, 2004. Second Reading debated
November 4, 15; December 8. Second Reading carried on division
December 9. Ordered referred to the Standing Committee on the
Legislative Assembly. Considered January 24, 27; February 2, 3, 10,
2005, Reported as amended February 15. Ordered for Third Reading,
Third Reading debated February 28, Third Reading carried on
division March 1. Royal Assent March 9. S.O. 2005, Chapter 2.
httll:llwww. ontla. on. ca/ documen ts/B iIIs/3 8 _Parliament/Session I !index .htm 41712005
b137ra_e Page I of 12
II Legislative Assembly ~\
,
of Ontario
Site Map I Fran<;ais Horne I Members I ~i!ls I HQuse Business I Hansarg I Commjttee~ l1:ibrary
Visitor Information Bill 132 2005
An Act to amend the
links Dog Owners' Liability Act
to increase public safety
Glossary in relation to dogs, including pit bulls,
and to make related amendments to the Animals for Research Act
About The Assembly
Copyright Her Majesty, by and with the ad\lce and consent of the Legislative Assembly of the
Province of Ontario, enacts as follows:
. WebCast Amendments to the Dog Owners' Liability Act
1. (1) The Dog Owners' Liability Act is amended by adding the following heading
immediately before section 1:
Interpretation
(2) Section 1 of the Act is amended by adding the following definitions:
"pit bull" includes,
(a) a pit buH terrier,
(b) a Staffordshire bull terrier,
(c) an American Staffordshire terrier,
(d) an American pit bull terrier,
(e) a dog that has an appearance and physical characteristics that are substantially similar
to those of dogs referred to in any of clauses (a) to (d); ("pit-bull")
"pound" has the same meaning as in the Animalsfor Research Act; ("fourriere")
"regulation" means a regulation made under this Act. ("reglement")
(3) Section 1 of the Act is amended by adding the following subsection:
Same
(2) In determining whether a dog is a pit bull Vtithin the meaning of this Act, a court may
have regard to the breed standards established for Staffordshire Bun Terriers, American
Staffordshire Terriers or American Pit Bull Terriers by the Canadian Kennel Club, the
United Kennel Club, the American Kennel Club or the American Dog Breeders Association.
(4) The Act is amended by adding the following heading immediately before
section 2:
hUD:/ /www.ontla.on.ca/documents/Bills/38_ParliamentlSession lib I 32ra_e.htm 4/7/2005
bI3~ra_e Page 2 of 12
Civil Liability
(5) The Act is amended by adding the following heading immediately before
section 4:
Proceedings - Part IX of the Provincial Offences Act
(6) Subsection 4 (1) of the Act, as re-enacted by the Statutes of Ontario, 2000,
chapter 26, Schedule A, section 6, is repealed and the following substituted:
Proceedings against owner of dog
(1) A proceeding may be commenced in the Ontario Court of Justice against an owner of a
dog if it is alleged that,
(a) the dog has bitten or attacked a person or domestic animal;
(b) the dog has behaved in a manner that poses a menace to the safety of persons or
domestic animals; or
(c) the O\vner did not exercise reasonable precautions to prevent the dog from,
(i) biting or attacking a person or domestic animal, or
(ij) behaving in a manner that poses a menace to the safety of persons or domestic animals.
Same
(1.1) A proceeding may be commenced in the Ontario Court of Justice against a person if it
is alleged that the person contravened a provision of this Act or the regulations or a court
order made under this Act.
Nature of proceeding
(1.2) Part IX of the Provincial Offences Act applies to a proceeding under this section.
Standard of proof
(1.3) Findings of fact in a proceeding under this section shall be made on the balance of
probabilities.
(7) Subsection 4 (2) of the Act, as re-enacted by the Statutes of Ontario, 2000,
chapter 26, Schedule A, section 6, is amended by adding "or (1.1)" after
"subsection (1)".
(8) Subsection 4 (3) of the Act, as re-enacted by the Statutes of Ontario, 2000,
chapter 26, Schedule A, section 6, is amended by adding "or that the dog's
behaviour is such that the dog is a menace to the safety of persons or domestic
animals" after "bitten or attacked a person or domestic animal" in the portion
before clause (a).
(9) Clause 4 (3) (b) of the Act, as enacted by the Statutes of Ontario, 2000,
chapter 26, Schedule A, section 6, is amended by adding at the end "or for
purposes of public safety".
http://www .ontla.on.ca/documents/B ills/38_ParliamentiSessionl/b 132ra_e.htm 4/7/2005
b13+ra_e Page 3 of 12
(to) Subsection 4 (4) of the Act, as re-enacted by the Statutes of Ontario,
2000, chapter 26, Schedule A, section 6, is amended by adding the following
paragraph:
4. Posting warning signs.
(11) Subsection 4 (5) of the Act, as enacted by the Statutes of Ontario, 2000,
chapter 26, Schedule A, section 6, is amended by adding "and such other
means as the court may order" after "leash and muzzle".
(12) Subsection 4 (6) of the Act, as enacted by the Statutes of Ontario, 2000,
chapter 26, Schedule A, section 6, is amended by adding "Except as provided
by subsections (S) and (9)" at the beginning.
(13) Section 4 of the Act, as re-enacted by the Statutes of Ontario, 2000,
chapter 26, Schedule A, section 6, is amended by adding the fonawing
subsections:
Sterilization requirement
(7) The ovmer of a dog that is subject to an order under clause (3) (b) shaH ensure that the
dog is neutered or spayed, as the case may be, v.ithin 30 days of the making of the order or,
if the court specifies a different time period, \'Vithin the time period specified by the court.
Mandatory order under d. (3) (a)
(8) When, in a proceeding under this section, the court finds that the dog is a pit bull and
has bitten or attacked a person or domestic animal, or has behaved in a manner that poses
a menace to the safety of persons or domestic animals, the court shall make an order under
clause (3) (a).
Same
(9) When, in a proceeding under this section, the court finds that the owner of a pit bull
contravened a provision of this Act or the regulations relating to pit bulls or contravened a
court order relating to one or more pit bulls, the court shall make an order under clause 3
(a).
Onus of proof, pit bulls
(10) If it is alleged in any proceeding under this section that a dog is a pit bun, the onus of
proving that the dog is not a pit bull lies on the owner of the dog.
(14) Section 5 of the Act, as re-enacted by the Statutes of Ontario, 2000,
chapter 26, Schedule A, section 6, is amended by,
(a) suiking out "subsection 4 (1)" and substituting "section 4"; and
(b) adding "or that the dog's behaviour is such that the dog is a menace to the
safety of persons or domestic animals" after "bitten or attacked a person or
domestic animal".
(15) The Act is amended by adding the following section:
Precautions by Dog Ov.l1ers
httn:/ /www.ontla.on.ca/documents/Bills/3 8 _ParI iament/Session lib I 3 2ra_ e.htm 4/7/2005
b13~ra_e Page 4 of 12
Owner to prevent dog from attacking
5.1 The owner of a dog shall exercise reasonable precautions to prevent it from,
(a) biting or attacking a person or domestic animal; or
(b) behaving in a manner that poses a menace to the safety of persons or domestic animals.
(16) Sections 6 and 7 of the Act, as enacted by the Statutes of Ontario, 2000,
chapter 26, Schedule A, section 6, are repealed and the following substituted:
Pit Bulls - Ban and Related Controls
Pit bull ban
6. Except as permitted by this Act or the regulations, no person shall,
Ca) own a pit bulJ;
(b) breed a pit bulJ;
(c) transfer a pit bull, whether by sale, gift or othef\\'ise;
Cd) abandon a pit bull other than to a pound operated by or on behalf of a municipality,
Ontario or a designated body;
(e) allow a pit bull in his or her possession to stray;
(f) import a pit bull into Ontario; or
Cg) train a pit buH for fighting.
Ownership of restricted pit bulls
7. (1) For the purposes of this Act, a pit bull is a restricted pit bull if,
(a) it is ov.med by a resident of Ontario on the day subsection 1 (16) of the Public Safety
Related to Dogs Statute Law Amendment Act, 2005 comes into force; or
(b) it is born in Ontario before the end of the 9o-day period beginning on the day
subsection 1 (16) of the Public Safety Related to Dogs Statute Law Amendment Act, 2005
comes into force.
Same
(2) Despite clause 6 (a), a person may O'V\-TI a pit buH if it is a restricted pit bull.
Controls on restricted pit bulls
(3) A person who owns a restricted pit bull shall ensure compliance with the requirements
set out in this Act and the regulations that relate to restricted pit buns, vvithin such time
frames as are provided for those requirements in this Act or the regulations.
Ownership of pit bull other than restricted
hUD:/ Iwww.ontla.on.caldocuments/BilIs/3 8 _Parliament/Session I /b 13 2ra_ e.htm 4/7/2005
b 132ra_e Page 5 of 12
8. (1) Despite clause 6 (a), a pound may own a pit bull that is not a restricted pit bull for as
long as is reasonably necessary to fulfil its obligations under the Animalsfor Research Act.
Same
(2) Despite clause 6 (a), a research facility registered under the Animal.<;for Research Act
may own a pit bull that is not a restricted pit bull that is transferred to it under the Animals
for Research Act.
Transfer of pit bulls
9. (1) Despite clause 6 (c) and subject to the regulations, an O\\TIcr of a restricted pit bun
may transfer that pit bun by gift or bequest.
Same
(2) No person who owned one or more pit bulls on the day subsection 1 (16) of the Public
Safety Related to Dogs Statute Law Amendment Act, 2005 comes into force shall acquire a
pit bull under subsection (1) after that day if the effect of the acquisition would be that the
person owns more pit bulls after that day than on that day.
Same
(3) No person ,vho did not 0\'\'11 a pit bull on the day subsection 1 (16) of the Public Safety
Related to Dogs Statute Law Amendment Act, 2005 comes into force shall acquire more
than one pit bull under subsection (1) after that day.
Same
(4) The limits set out in subsections (2) and (3) do not apply to a pound operated by or on
behalf of a municipality, Ontario or a designated body or to a research facility vvithin the
meaning of the Animalsfor Research Act.
Same
(5) Despite clause 6 (c), a pit bull may be transferred by its owner to a pound operated by
or on behalf of a municipality, Ontario or a designated body.
Same
(6) Despite clause 6 (c), a pit bull may be transferred in accordance "vith section 20 of the
Animals for Research Act.
Importation of restricted pit bulls
10. (1) For the purposes of clause 6 (f), an individual who leaves Ontario ",ith a restricted
pit bull and returns to Ontario v'lith that pit bull \',ithin three months is not importing that
pit bull into Ontario.
Same
(2) For the purposes of clause 6 (f), an individual who owns a pit bull on the day referred to
in clause 7 (1) (a) and is legally resident in Ontario on that day, but who is not present in
Ontario on that day, is not importing a pit bull into Ontario if he or she returns to Ontario
v"ith that pit bull within three months of that day,
httD:/lwww .ontla.on.ca/ documents/B iIIs/3 8 _Parliament/Session I /b 13 2ra_ e .htm 4/7/2005
b132ra3 Page 6 of 12
MunicipaJ by-laws
11. Despite section 14 of the Municipal Act, 2001, if there is a conflict between a provision
of this Act or of a regulation under this or any other Act relating to pit bulls and a provision
of a by-law passed by a municipality relating to pit bulls, the provision that is the most
restrictive in relation to controls or bans on pit buns prevails.
Search and Seizure
Peace officers
12. For the purposes of this Act, the follo'A1ng persons are peace officers:
1. A police officer, including a police officer "'1thin the meaning of the Police Services Act, a
special constable, a First Nations Constable and an auxiJiar.y member of a police force.
2. A municipal law enforcement officer.
3. An inspector or agent under the Ontario Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to
Animals Act.
4. A public officer designated as a peace officer for the purposes of this Act.
Warrant to seize dog
13. (1) Subsection (2) applies where a justice of the peace is satisfied by information on
oath or affirmation that there are reasonable grounds to believe that,
(a) a dog is in any building, receptacle or place, induding a dwelling house, other than in a
pound operated by or on behalf of a municipality, Ontario or a designated body or in a
research facility registered under the Animalsfor Research Act; and
(b) it is not desirable in the interests of public safety that the dog be in that location.
Same
(2) In the circumstances described in subsection (1), the justice of the peace may issue a
warrant authorizing a peace officer named in the \varrant to enter any building, receptacle
or place, including a dwelling house, to search for and seize the dog and any muzzle, collar
or other equipment for the dog.
Same
(3) Without limiting the generality of clause (1) (b), it is not desirable in the interests of
public safety for a dog to be in a location other than in a pound operated by or on behalf of
a municipality, Ontario or a designated body or in a research facility registered under the
Animalsfor Research Act if,
(a) the dog has on one or more occasions bitten or attacked a person or domestic animal;
(b) the dog has on one or more occasions behaved in a manner that poses a menace to the
safety of persons or domestic animals;
(c) an owner of the dog has on one or more occasions failed to exercise reasonable
precautions to prevent the dog from,
http://www.ontla.on.caJdocuments/Bills/3 8 _Parliament/Session lib 13 2ra_ e .htm 4/7/2005
b132ra3 Page 7 of 12
(0 biting or attacking a person or domestic animal, or
(ii) behaving in a manner that poses a menace to the safety of persons or domestic animals;
(d) the dog is a restricted pit bun and an O\~tner of the dog has on one or more occasions
failed to comply with one or morc of the requirements of this Act or the regulations
respecting restricted pit bulls;
(e) the dog is a pit buH other than a restricted pit bull; or
(f) there is reason to believe that the dog may cause harm to a person or domestic animal.
Same
(4) A peace officer named in a warrant \vho is executing a warrant under this section may
be accompanied by one or more veterinarians or animal control personnel as are
reasonably required to give effect to the safe and humane seizure of the dog, whether the
accompanying persons are named in the warrant or not.
Same
(5) Every warrant issued under this section shan name a date on which it expires, which
date shan be not later than 30 days after its issue.
Same
(6) Every warrant shan be executed between 6 a.m. and 9 p.m., unless the justice by the
warrant otheru.rlse authorizes.
Exigent circumstances
14. (1) Where the circumstances in clauses 13 (1) (a) and (b) exist and it would be
impracticable to obtain a warrant because of exigent circumstances, a peace officer may
exercise any of the powers of a peace officer described in section 13.
Same
(2) In this section, exigent circumstances include circumstances in which the peace officer
has reasonable grounds to suspect that entry into any building, receptacle or place,
including a dwelling house, is necessary to prevent imminent bodily harm or death to any
person or domestic animal.
Seizure in public place
15. (1) A peace officer may seize a dog in a public place if the officer believes on
reasonable grounds that,
(a) the dog has on one or more occasions bitten or attacked a person or domestic animal;
(b) the dog has on one or more occasions behaved in a manner that poses a menace to the
safety of persons or domestic animals;
(c) an owner of the dog has on one or more occasions failed to exercise reasonable
precautions to prevent the dog from,
httu:/ /www.ontla.on.caJdocumentslBills/3 8 _ParI iamentiSession lib 13 2ra_ e.htm 4/7/2005
b 132ra_e Page 8 of 12
(i) biting or attacking a person or domestic animal,
(ii) behaving in a maDDer that poses a menace to the safety of persons or domestic animals;
Cd) the dog is a restricted pit bull and an ovvner of the dog has on one or more occasions
failed to comply vllth one or more of the requirements of this Act or the regulations
respecting restricted pit bulls;
(e) the dog is a pit bull other than a restricted pit bull; or
(f) there is reason to believe that the dog may cause harm to a person or domestic animal,
Same
(2) Subsection (1) shaH not be interpreted to restrict seizure of a dog in a public place if the
seizure is otherwise 18\\'fu1.
Necessary force
16. A peace officer may use as much force as is necessary to execute a \",arrant issued
under section 13 or to exercise any authority given by section 14 or 15.
Delivery of seized dog to pound
17. A peace officer who seizes a dog under section 13, 14 or 15 shan promptly deliver the
seized dog to a pound operated by or on behalf of a municipality, Ontario or a designated
body.
Offences
Offences
18. (1) An indi\idual who contravenes any provision of this Act or the regulations or who
contravenes an order made under this Act or the regulations is guilty of an offence and
liable, on conviction, to a fine of not more than $10,000 or to imprisonment for a term of
not more than six months, or both.
Same
(2) A corporation that contravenes any provision of this Act or the regulations or that
contravenes an order made under this Act or the regulations is guilty of an offence and
liable, on comiction, to a fine of not more than $60,000.
Same
(3) If a person is convicted of an offence under this Act, the court making the conviction
may, in addition to any other penalty, order the person comicted to make compensation or
restitution in relation to the offence.
Identification of pit bull
19. (1) A document purporting to be signed by a member of the Conege of Veterinarians of
Ontario stating that a dog is a pit bull ,\ithin the meaning of this Act is receivable in
e\,idence in a prosecution for an offence under this Act as proof, in the absence of evidence
to the contrary, that the dog is a pit bull for the purposes of this Act, ",ithout proof of the
httn'//wwwont la.on.caJdocuments/B ilIs/38 Parliament/Session lib I 32ra_e.htm 4/7/2005
b132ra_e Page 9 of 12
signature and 'without proof that the signatory is a member of the College.
Immlmity
(2) No action or other proceeding may be instituted against a member of the College of
Veterinarians of Ontario for prmiding, in good faith, a document described in subsection
(1).
Onus of proof
(3) For greater certainty, this section does not remove the onus on the prosecution to
prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt.
Regulations
Regulations
20. (1) The Lieutenant Governor in Council may make regulations respecting the control
of pit bulls,
Same
(2) Without limiting the generality of subsection (1), the Lieutenant Governor in Council
may make regulations,
(a) respecting leashing and muzzling of restricted pit bulls;
(b) respecting the spaying or neutering of restricted pit bulls;
(c) authorizing persons or other bodies specified in the regulations to pass and enforce by-
laws governing pit bulls for the purposes of unorganized territory or specified parts of
unorganized territory in the same ways that a municipality can pass and enforce by-lmvs
governing pit bulls for the purposes of its geographic jurisdiction;
(d) governing the presence in Ontario of pit buBs in connection with dog shows, inc1uding
regulations providing for exemptions, subject to any restrictions specified in the
regulations, from any provision of this Act or the regulations;
(e) designating bodies referred to as designated in this Act;
(f) designating public officers as peace officers for the purposes of this Act.
Same
(3) Regulations may be general or specific.
Same
(4) Without limiting the generality of subsection (3), a regulation may be made to apply or
not to apply to a person or body specified in the regulation.
Amendments to the Animalsfor Research Act
2. (1) The definition of "pOlmd" in section 1 of the Animalsfor Research Act is
amended by adding "or the Dog Owners' Liability Act" after "by-law of a
hUu:/ /www.ontla.on.ca!documents/Bills/3 8 _ParI iament/Sessi on lib 13 2ra_ e.htm 4/7/2005
b132ra_e Page 10 of 12
municipality" .
(2) Section 1 of the Act, as amended by the Statutes of Ontario, 1994, chapter
27, section 9 and 1999, chapter 12, Schedule A, section 3, is amended by
adding the following subsection:
Restricted pit bull, meaning
(2) The term "restricted pit bull" has the same meaning for the purposes of this Act as it
has for the purposes of the Dog Owners' Liability Act.
(3) Subsection 20 (5) of the Act is amended by striking out "subject to
subsection (7)11 and substituting "subject to subsections (7) to (74)".
(4) Subsection 20 (6) oftbe Act is amended by striking out "subject to
subsection (7)" in the portion before dause (a) and substituting "subject to
subsections (7) to (7.4)".
(5) Section 20 of the Act is amended by adding the following subsections:
Transfers of pit pulls
(7.1) No pit bull may be transferred under,
(a) clause '4 (3) (b):
(b) subsection (5) of this section; or
(c) clause (6) (a) or (b) ofthis section,
Same
(7.2) The operator of a pound who believes it has possession of a pit bull and who has
found the person who owned the dog before it was delivered to the pound shan provide the
ovmer ",..lth an opportunity to satisfy the pound that,
(a) the dog is not a pit bull; or
(b) the dog is a restricted pit bull and the owner has complied \vith all of the requirements
of the Dog Owners' Liability Act and the regulations under it relating to pit buUs.
Same
(7.3) If the owner satisfies the operator of the pound that either of clause (7.2) (a) or (b)
apply, the operator shall return the dog to the owner, subject to the payment of such
damages, fines and expenses as are required by law, unless the operator has reason to
believe that the return of the dog would pose a menace to the safety of persons or domestic
animals.
Same
(7.4) Where the operator of a pound believes it has possession of a pit bull and that it
should not return the pit bull under subsection (7.3), the operator of the pound shall do
one of the following \\lth the dog:
httD:I /www.ontla.on.ca/documents/Bills/38 Parliament/Session lib I 32ra_e.htm 4/7/2005
b 132ra_e . Page 11 of 12
1. Destroy the dog.
2. Transfer the dog to a person who is resident outside Ontario in a jurisdiction in which
ovmership and possession of the pit bull is lawful, where the person is acquiring the dog, in
good faith, in order that it be used as a pet or in hunting or for working purposes.
3. Transfer the dog in accordance v..ith clause 20 (6) (c).
4. Transfer the dog in accordance \v1th the permission to transfer restricted pit bulls given
by section 9 of the Dog Owners' Liability Act.
(6) Subsection 20 (12) of the Act is amended by adding "or the Dog Owners'
Liability Act" after "byw)aw of a local municipality".
Commencement
3. This Act comes into force on a day to be named by proclamation of the
Lieutenant Governor.
Short title
4. The short title of this Act is the Public Safety Related to Dogs Statute Law
Amendment Act, 2005.
EXPLANATORY NOTE
This Explanatory Note was written as a reader's aid to Bill 132 and does notform port of
the law. Bill 132 has been enacted as Chapter 2 of the Statutes of Ontario, 2005.
Section I of the Bill amends the Dog Owners' Liability Act to do the following:
1. Authorize the commencement of a proceeding against a dog ovmer where the dog poses a
menace to the safety of persons or domestic animals or against a person '.."ho contravenes
the Act, the regulations made under the Act or a court order made under the Act.
(subsection 1 (6) of the Bill, section 4 of the Act)
2. Add to the orders that mayor shall be made in those proceedings. (subsections 1 (10) to
(14) of the Bill, sections 4 and 5 of the Act)
3. Except as permitted by the Act or regulations under it, in relation to pit bulls [defined in
subsection 1 (2) of the Bill, section 1 of the Act}, prohibit owning, breeding, transferring,
abandoning, importing and training to fight. (subsection 1 (16) of the Bill, section 6 of the
Act)
4. Provide an exception to the prohibition for "restricted pit bulls". These are pit bulls
o'..\11ed by an Ontario resident \vhen the BiiJ comes into force and pit buHs born in Ontario
\\ithin 90 days of the Bill coming into force. O\vners of restricted pit bulls must ensure
compliance with the provisions of the Act and regulations relating to restricted pit bulls.
(subsection 1 (16) ofthe Bill, section 7 of the Act)
5. Provide for controls on pit bulls. (subsection I (16) oEthe BiH, sections 8 to 11 of the Act)
6. PrO\ide for search and seizure of dogs under a v.arrant, in exigent circumstances or, in
spedfied drcumstances, in a public place. (subsection 1 (16) of the Bill, sections 12 to 17 of
the Act)
httn.ffuououo rmtb An r~/rI()rllmentslBiIIs/38 ParliamenUSessionllb132ra_e.htm 4/7/2005
b132ra e . Page 12 of 12
. -
7. Provide for offences and penalties for contraventions of the Act, the regulations made
under it and orders made under it, (subsection 1 (16) of the Bill, section 18 of the Act)
~
8. Provide for matters relating to proof as to ,-,,,hether a dog is a pit bull for the purposes of
prosecutions for offences under the Act. (subsection 1 (16) of the Bill, section 19 of the Act)
9. Authorize the making of regulations respecting the control of pit buns. (subsection 1 (16)
of the Bill, section 20 of the Act)
Section 2 of the Bill makes related amendments to the Animals for Research Act
with respect to the disposition of pit bulls under that Act. (section 2 of the Bill,
sections I and 20 of the Act)
Sections 3 and 4 provide for commencement and short title.
Copyright @ 2005
Journals and Procedural Research Branch
Office of the Legislative Assembly of Ontario
Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
httn'//www onth on ","/oo"lIments/Bil1s/38 Parliament/Sessionl/b132ra e,htm 4/7/2005
0
. . . Ce. .D.
F
RECEIVED I March 21,2005
I - \
MAR 24 1005 I ,
,
,
ORO-MEDONTE I 133 Bay Street
Shanty Bay, Ontario
TOWNSHIP LOL 2LO
Mr. Paul Marshall
Councillor, Ward 3
Township ofOro Medonte
Oro, Ontario
Dear Paul
I am part owner of the wooded property
abutting the north side of Bay Street in Shanty Bay between 132 Bay Street and the west end of
the street, please see attached diagram. The wooded area is called the Church Woods and
includes about 25 acres. A seasonal stream emerges ITom the woods into point A shown on the
diagram. The streams runs underneath Mr. Robinson's driveway and eventually runs into Lake
Simcoe ITom Mr. Bigelow's property. Sometime on or about January 1,2005 during a winter
thaw, the stream overflowed into Mr. Woolsey's property, went into Mr. Woolsey's house and
caused considerable damage to carpets and other items.
There is a considerable amount of snow on
the ground and a sudden warm spell could cause the stream to overflow again. As well, the
culvert underneath Mr. Robinson's driveway is too small to handle a major overflow and the
culvert is damaged at the west end of the culvert at point B shown on the diagram. The damage
has reduced the diameter of the culvert. I am concerned that the stream may overflow this spring
again into Mr. Woolsey's property. In order to ensure that the stream does not overflow
again, I recommend that the township replace the culvert underneath Mr. Robinson's
driveway with a larger diameter culvert before this coming spring thaw.
Most of the water in the stream comes ITom
fields and ITom the urban development north of the Church Woods and north of the former
railroad tracks. Over the past few years since the new Arbourwood development started, the
amount of water entering the Church Woods has increased. The evidence of the additional water
is the new streambeds being gouged ITom the Church Woods. I can show you the new
streambeds. The additional water comes from the new development and ITom a field just east of
line 2 and opposite the new development. You and I have discussed the source of this additional
water. In the spring of 2004, the township promised to take steps to reduce the amount of water
entering the Church Woods ITom the field.
Another condition causing the flooding is
that the ditch alongside the north side of Bay Street has silted up since it was last dug out about
15 years ago. Even during the summer, water level in the ditch is only about six inches below the
crown of Bay Street. The water in the ditch overflows regularly during heavy summer
thunderstorms. The township should dig the ditch out again.
1
. . .
.
~
I should note that the ditch is a ITog habitat.
Everyone living along Bay Street enjoys the singing of the ITogs in the spring. The last time that
the ditch was dug out, I recall that it was dug out in two sections over two years. I believe that
this method helped to preserve the ITog habitat. After the first section was dug out, I believe that
the ITogs migrated into the newly dug out section ITom the original section. The next year when
the second section was dug out, I believe that the ITogs migrated back to the newly dug out
section from the first section that was dug out and therefore preserved the ITog population. If the
township digs the ditch out again, I suggest that the township consult with the Lake Simcoe
Region Conservation Authority and dig out the ditch by the method done previously or by any
other method that preserves the ITog population and allows the original habitat to regenerate.
There are other problems with storm water
in the Shanty Bay area. For example:
. I believe that the storm water management ponds constructed for the Arbourwood
development are not adequate. They are usually full and overflow during every heavy
summer thunderstorm.
. The newly dug out drainage ditch along the north side of the railroad tracks and west of
line 2 does not contain enough vegetation to prevent erosion of the ditch.
. There is a housing development north of the Shanty Bay School that does not have a
storm water retention pond. The storm water runoff ITO the development is gouging a
deep stream bed beside the Gamer's property and dumping tons of soil and probably
phosphorus into the lake.
. I believe that Mr. Peter Mayer has some problems with storm water overflow ITom the
Arbourwood development.
Long term, I believe that the Township of
Oro Medonte should work with private landowners and the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation
Authority to develop a storm water and habitat preservation program that will achieve the
following objectives:
. Prevent future flooding of Mr. Woolsey's property.
. Review whether the storm water retention ponds for the Arbourwood development are
adequate and achieving their purposes.
. If necessary fix the existing storm water retention ponds and where required, build new
ones.
. Preserve the ITog habitat along the ditch along Bay Street and other important habitats in
the area.
. Where suitable, create new wild life and flora habitat.
I look forward to hearing ITom you.
Yours trulYO
cc. Mr. Ivan Woolsey ~(~
2
... ,,-
.
.
~ --
~
<(1 t:-
o
'l:. C\
~
Q
.L ....
'-1 '"
<z::
-.L It!
ill '-L :>
c.... \- -.)
~".-.." ::>.V" 'J
rt- "" ....
;:: )-_ IU
'^ ""'- '-J
c....""
_ ~ J
~~ ~
0" *"'~
~ ~W~
~ ~~
~n ~~
0- ~o
Q c.)
~ . 2
f--.' \I!
~ ~ ~ c
",2 "r
_ ........ :i:'
D- "....' "1:-
-:I:::: Q \-
'" I '"~
"- <- 'u i:i >-
~ , 2 ,'~ ,,:" '"
~ '" '" h ,_ C) ,.eo ~
SOl 0 > "'~ '"
-U! "'"'~' & \It
<:!:' ..._'> )_"'- 1:3
~"- J;p~ ~" -
.. ,- - -, ~ -'
-' ~,,- ",,"
'" ~ d. "' '" ,.. lL ,-
~ _ 2 ~
~ ~
~ ,~
_ 0,. cU
)_ ;[ x::..
~~
~
:r' '"" ()=~ 'L '
E ,a. _ -'h'" 'V
Il.! ;)~
'" '2\ 'J/I,A
\- 3 fF ~"F
....,., '......~~
~7a44?",,"fo'r.'P~~~
201 ~ 'D""",
g'"""",.()~
.l!47It 6?1t2
- 1
March 17,2005
Mayor J. Neil Craig
Township ofOro-Medonte
148 Line 7 S., Box 100
Oro, Ontario
LOL 2XO
Dear Mr. Craig,
As Chair ofthe Community Task Force for Physician Recruitment, I would like to extend our
genuine appreciation for the past financial support of our efforts by the council of the Township
of Oro-Medonte.
We respectful1y request thai the Council of the Township ofOro-Medonte appoint a member to
the Community Task Force for Physician Recruitment.
If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact myself or our Physician
Recruiter, Pamela Colquhoun, at any time. I can be reached at 705-728-9090 x4116 and Ms.
Colquhoun can be reached at 705-728-9090 x4294.
(:2"'1.9-
~=tj/ ~
R.Kel1
Chair, Community Task Force for Physici Recruitment
cc: Task Force Members
I R ECEI\TEDl
! MAR 1 2 1005 .
I ORO-MEDONTE
TOWNSHIP
MEMBERSHIP - Community Task Force for Physician Recruitment Page 1 of 1
Janette Teeter
From: Colquhoun, Pamela
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2005 9:16 AM
To: Janette Teeter
Subject: ORa - membership
MEMBERSHIp. Community Task Force for Physician Recruitment
Membership
Each member of the Community Task Force for Physician Recruitment is expected to attend the majority of
committee meetings, and encouraged to participate in a subcommittee, as outlined in the terms of reference.
Membership is not limited to a term, unless noted in the appointment of members from the City of Barrie,
Town of Innisfil, Township of Springwater, Township of Oro-Medonte, and the Township of Essa.
Meetings
Date: Last Wednesday of each month
Time: 4:00pm - 5:30pm
Location: RVH Boardroom, 3rd Floor
Remuneration
There is no remuneration for membership. Parking expenses will be covered for each committee meeting.
ROLESIRESPONSIBILITIES OF KEY MEMBERS ~
Co-Chair, Task Force - The Co-Chairs of the Task Force will lead the committee in coordinating
all relevant recruitment and retention initiatives, ultimately leading to an adequate supply of
phsyicians for the community.
Chair, Ways and Means - Reporting to the Task Force, the Chair of Ways and Means will
coordinate activities related to fundraising initiatives acceptable to the committee, the Hospital
and sponsoring communities. Initiatives may include but are not limited to:
. Considering formal approach to community clubs or corporations
. Considering fundraising initiatives
Chair, Physician Retention - Reporting to the Task Force, the Chair of Physician Retention will
coordinate activities relating to physicians and their families after they arrive in the community.
Initiatives may include but not limited to:
. Communicate and support with families during their move
. Maintain communications during the first 3 months
. Develop a formal survey after one year in Barrie
Chair, Student Programs - Reporting to the Task Force, the Chair of Student Programs will
coordinate activities designed to support and liaise with residents of Barrie and the surrounding
area who are interested in or admitted to Medical School. Initiatives may include but are not
limited to:
. Liaise with high school students who are interested in Medicine
. Maintain a contact list of Medical School StudentsIResidentslInterns
. Consider a tuition support program
. Consider other support programs to support or assist students in maintaining contact with
community
Physician Recruitment & Retention Coordinator
Under the direction of the Community Task Force for Physician Recruitment, the Chief of Staff, and the
Chief of Family Practice, the physician recruitment coordinator will coordinate all aspects of physician
recruitment by:
. Developing a comprehensive recruitment strategy with the Task Force undertaking recruitment
activities;
. Identify opportunities for student and resident placements, locums and permanent practices:
. Coordinating physician contacts, visit and tours:
. Foster partnerships with the community and business sector: and
. Establish relationships with representatives from various associations and medical bodies on a
provincial level
TERMS OF REFERENCE - Community Task Force for Physician Recruitment ~
PURPOSE
To bring physicians, hospital administrators, community leaders and municipal leaders of the
City of Barrie, Town of Innisfil, and Townships of Oro-Medonte, Springwater and Essa together
to develop and implement strategies to train, recruit and retain physicians in Barrie and the
surrounding areas.
The goal of the Task Force is to have an adequate supply of physicians for all residents in the
community, ultimately removing the City of Barrie and surrounding area from the Ministry of
Health's List of Areas Designated as Underserviced (LADAU).
OBJECTIVES
1. To develop and implement strategies to recruit family physicians for permanent practice and
locum tenens opportunities in Barrie and the surrounding area (Town of Innisfil, Township of
Essa, Township of Oro-Medonte, Township of Springwater).
2. To develop and implement strategies to recruit specialists for permanent practice and locum
tenens opportunities in Barrie and the surrounding area.
3. To develop and implement strategies to encourage medical students and residents to seek
training and permanent practice opportunities in Barrie and the surrounding area.
4. To retain current family physicians and specialists by acknowledging their services to the
community through various recognition initiatives.
5. To promote, through various media, provincial and municipal recruitment issues and
initiatives.
6. To pursue opportunities for alternative funding and fundraising for physician recruitment,
training and retention.
7. To advocate to government and government agencies.
MEMBERSHIP
Barb Baguley Deputy Mayor, Town of Innisfil
*Dr. Rob Ballagh Otolarnygologist, RVH Medical Staff
Patrick Brown Councillor, City of Barrie
Cathy Caldwell RVH Board of Directors
Pamela Colquhoun Physician Recruitment Coordinator
Donna Danyluk RVH Public Affairs Coordinator
Dr. Brad Dibble Cardiologist, RVH Medical Staff
Dr. Evelyn Elsey Dentist, Horseshoe Valley
Andy Gibson Past Alderman, City of Barrie
Sybil Goruk CEO, Barrie Chamber of Commerce
Dr. Rick Irvin Family Physician, RVH Medical Staff
*Richard Kelly RVH Human Resources Director
Barry Lee Springwater Lion's Club
Kevin LePage Councillor, City of Barrie
Heather McCarthy MPP Joe Tascona Representative
Don Nelson Resident of Elmvale
Carla Palmer Barrie Community Health Centre
Cephas Panschow City of Barrie Economic Development Office
*Co-Chair
- I
AUTISM SOCIETY ONTARIO Simcoe County Chapter
EmaH; Web,lte: Voice Mail: (705) 326-2214 ex! 251
March 2005
& Members
are writing to you on behalf of the Toonie for Autism Day campaign of
Autism Society Ontario We are sponsoring the 4th annual Toonie for
Autism Day campaign on friday, April 29tb, 2005. This is a province-
wide initiative to help young people, their teachers, their parents and their
communities get a better understanding about the chailenge people with
autism
Thousands students struggle with learning challenges associated with
autism or Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) in schools across Ontario.
More children are being diagnosed with autism than eller before and are
entering our schools in record numbers. They are in
specific educational supports, informed teachers and welcoming
classrooms fellow students.
Autism is a complex developmental disability that typically appears during
the first three years of life. It is the result of a neurological disorder that
affects the functioning brain. number of children diagnosed is
rising an Autism affects at least 1 in 500 and as many as
1 in 200 individuOl.ls There is no known cause and there is no cure. The
impact on an individual and their families lasts a Most people
very little understanding about what autism is Researchers
continue to struggle with finding better diagnostic techniques and
treatment methods.
year's campaign involved school boards and over 503 public.
separate, French, private, nursery schools and daycare facilities. The
2004 campaign attracted more than 121 new participants. Besides the
new level of awarenes!!I of autism, to date more than $225,000 has
been raised for autism research. More than 365,600 students and staff
and over 1,279,600 families across Ontario participated. Autism Society
and the Toonie for Autism Day committee recognize this
campaign was a resounding success.
I RECEIVED]
MAR 1 8 2005 I
ORO-MEDONTE I
TOWNSHIP I
are counting on your help to make this program a success; We write
request that your Municipality declare in the form of a written
proclamation "TOONIE FOR AUTISM DAY" an official calendar event on
< LAST FRIDAY OF APRIL (this year it falls on April 29th).
kindly request that this be considered and passed to your Council for
approval.
to school participation, it would be commendable for others such
as the employees of your municipality, to take the initiative and hold their
own T oonie for Autism Day. It is suggested that if the municipality
employees participate, someone should be chosen be a liaison with our
committee
Registration may be
donation makes a difference and we would greatly appreciate your
participation in helping improve the quality of for ail those children and
adults affected by this devastating disorder
Please help this very worthy cause.
Sincerely,
Gail Dumais
Taonia for Autism Day liaison
County Chapter
13
Penetanguishene, ON
L9M 1
-
Minister Ministre delegue N1 5d
Responsible for aux Affaires'des
Seniors personnes iigees
6th Floor Se etage
400 University Avenue 400, avenue University ~
Toronto ON M7A 2R9 Toronto ON M7A 2R9 Ontario
Tel.: (416) 585-7000 Tel.: (416) 585-7000
Fax: (416) 585-6470 Telee.: (416) 585-6470
March 10, 2005
Dear Mayor:
As you may know, June is recognized as Seniors' Month in Ontario.
I am writing to ask that you consider officially proclaiming June as Seniors' Month in your community this
year. For your convenience, a sample proclamation is provided for your consideration.
Once again the 'theme for this year's Seniors' Month is Active Living. The full slogan that has been chosen is
Active Living: It's For Life.
Seniors' Month is an excellent opportunity to pay tribute to men and women who continue to contribute so
much to our communities. On behalf of the Ontario government, I hope you will join us in recognizing seniors
in this province and plan events that recognize their contributions.
We would like to hear about any events that you are planning, so that information can be posted on the Ontario
Seniors' Secretariat Web site. An event form is also available on our Web site at
www.gov.on.calcitizenship/seniors under the Seniors' Month 2005 link. We would also appreciate knowing if
your jurisdiction will proclaim June as Seniors' Month in your community.
To help with your planning, you may want to consider hosting an Ontario Seniors' Seminar. These
seminars were developed to provide seniors with valuable information on healthy aging and healthy
lifestyles, and are available province-wide. Topics include "Safe Medication Use," Protect Your
Money: Schemes, Scams and Flimflams," "Drive Wise" and "Advance Care Planning." For more
information, contact the Seniors' InfoLine at 1-888-910-1999
(TTY 1-800-387-5559) or visit the Seniors' Secretariat Web site under the "seminars" link.
Information about Seniors' Month will be posted on the OSS Web site as it becomes available. We
will also be sending you promotional materials, including our annual poster, as we move closer to
June. In the meantime, we encourage you to visit the Web site to keep informed on recent
announcements affecting seniors.
Please keep in touch, and keep us posted on what you are planning.
Sincerely,
--
John Gerretsen \RECEIVED
\ MAR 1 8 1005
Minister
I ORO-MEDONTE
Enclosures \ TOWNSHIP
March 9. 2005
TO MUNICIPAL COUNCIL
At the February 5. 2005 Executive meeting of the Association of Municipal Tax Collectors of Ontario. the following resolution
was passed:
Background
In the 2004 Ontario Budget. the Province announced a plan to give municipalities a range of options to modify the parameters of
the tax capping program in order to increase progress towards taxation based on CV A; however, the legislation does nothing to
keep properties at CV A taxation for future years.
Property tax protection for increasing properties has now been in place for 8 years. with decreasing properties shouldering the
burden of that protection in most municipalities. Municipalities strongly believe that once a property reaches CV A taxes, it should
no longer be protected from normal economic assessment increases and that decreasing properties should be allowed the benefit
of paying property taxes in accordance with their current value assessment, and not be subject to unpredictable and fluctuating
clawback rates, calculated annually.
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS mandatory property tax increase protection has been in place for the business sector since the original implementation
of current value assessment (CVA) in 1998; and
WHEREAS many protected properties continue to pay property taxes at a level far below CVA tax; and
WHEREAS properties that should be receiving property tax decreases continue to pay at an unfair level of over 100% of CV A tax
in order to fund tax dollars not levied to properties protected by the capping regime; and
WHEREAS the Province of Ontario has provided optional capping tools which may be utilized to increase progress towards taxation
based on CV A; and
WHEREAS property taxation based on CV A has been the goal since the implementation of current value assessment in 1998; and
WHEREAS property taxation based on CV A is considered to be a fair and equitable method of distributing taxes; and
WHEREAS assessment value volatiiity is naturally controlled through the process ot annual reassessments;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Association of Municipal Tax Collectors of Ontario (AMTCO) strongly urges the
Province of Ontario to amend the legisiation commencing for the 2006 taxation year. to specify that once a property reaches CV A
taxation. it remains at CV A taxes, regardless of the result of future reassessments; and
THAT A COPY OF THIS RESOLUTION BE FORWARDED to The Honourable Dalton McGuinty, The Honourable Greg Sorbara.
The Honourabie John Gerretsen. the Municipal Finance Officers' Association (MFOA), the Association of Municipal Managers,
Clerks & Treasurers of Ontario (AMCTO), the Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO). and all the AMTCO member
municipalities, requesting endorsement
Yours truly. I RECEI\JEDl
~ MAR 1 6 2005 i
,
Tony Derro, I
ORO-MEDONTE ,
Secretary . i
TOWNSHI~
~~
~"'Of ORO' -~
6,~'" ./-" -4, h
, rlo),/ ,-"<~"Cy.
Il~%\
~.., ~~
t:I" . . "'.~
'c."'-- "f,'K
"~'~~:f3~'3";'
""'"'(~~
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
REPORT
Dept. Report No. To: Prepared By:
TR 2005-09 Committee of the Whole Bonnie McPhee
Subject: Department:
Council Treasury
Statement of Accounts
C.ofW. Date:
March April 06, 2005
Motion # R.M. File #:
Date: RolI#:
Following is the statement of accounts for the month of March.
Batch No. Date Amount
Cheque ReQisters:
AC00315 March 01, 2005 $ 64,644.23
AC00316 March 09, 2005 261,372.81
AC00317 March 10,2005 9,300.00
AC00318 March 16, 2005 47,195.87
AC00319 March 23, 2005 3,949,102.79
AQ00286 March 29, 2005 700.00
AC00320 March 30, 2005 238,098.94
$ 4,570,414.64
Pavroll:
PROO069 March 05, 2005 81,680.48
PROOO72 March 29, 2005 82,233.93
163,914.41
Credit Card ReQisters:
AEOOO07 March 21, 2005 1,265.32
AEOOO08 March 21, 2005 3,761.64 5,026.96
Total $ 4,739,356.01
f3
I'
.
;
I .
!
\
JI RECOMMENDATlON(S): II
1. THAT Report No. TR 2005 - 09 is received.
2. The accounts for the month of March 2005 totaling $4,739,356.01 are received.
Respectfully submitted,
"~ ///~
..;;(~ .
~-
Bonnie McPhee
Accounting Clerk
C.A.O. Comments: Date:
CAO. Dept. Head
- 2-
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
REPORT
Dept. Report No. To: Prepared By:
F.D. Report 2005 - 09 Committee of the Whole Lynn Burness, F.D.
Secretarv
Subject: Department:
Council Oro-Medonte Fire and
Fire Report for Month of Emergency Services
C.ofW. February, 2005 Date:
March 29, 2005
Motion # R.M. File #:
Date: RolI#:
DATE STATION TIME TYPE LOCATION DAMAGE
Station #2 Tree Fire Line 14 South
Februarv 3, 2005 Hawkestone 16:52:00
Station #2 Motor Vehicle Highway 11 @ Line 11
Februarv 4, 2005 Hawkestone 18: 09: 00 Accident
Station #4 Snowmobile 1008 Line 8 North
Februarv 5, 2005 Ruobv 17:28: 00 Accident
Station #1 Medical Assist 2773 Ridge Road
Februarv 5, 2005 Shanty Bav 19: 21: 00 Call
Station #1 Motor Vehicle Highway 11 @ Line
Februarv 5, 2005 Shanty Bav 19: 54:00 Accident 1
Station #2 Ice J Water Rescue Bottom of Line 9 S.,
Februarv 6, 2005 Hawkestone 17:47:00 Vehicle on Ice On Lake
Station #4 Medical Assist 1008 Line 8 North
Februarv 6, 2005 Ruabv 17: 19: 18 Call
Station #4 Medical Assist 878 Line 8 North
Februarv 6, 2005 Ruabv 20:31: 00 Call
Station #1 Alarm - No Fire, Ridge Road West
Februarv 7, 2005 Shanty Bav 06:21: 00 Nothina Found
,
b -
F.D. Report 2005 - 09
DATE STATION TIME TYPE lOCATION DAMAGE
Station #1 Motor Vehicle 2793 Ridge Road
Februarv 7, 2005 Shanty Bav 06:32: 00 Accident West
Station #1 Carbon Monoxide 5 Pemberton Lane
February 7, 2005 Shanty Bay 14:51:00 Call
Station #3 Snowmobile Fire, Carley Road, at Line $ 8,000.00 L
February 8, 2005 Horseshoe 00: 35:00 Fully Involved 9 North, Next to Track, $ .00 S
Station #$ Medical Assist Highway 400 @ Mt.
Februarv 9, 2005 Moonstone 11: 00: 00 Call St. Louis Rd. Exit
Station #1 Carbon Monoxide 5 Pemberton Lane
Februarv 9, 2005 Shanty Bav 15: 14:26 Call
Station #2 Motor Vehicle Highway 11 NIB,
February 10, 2005 Hawkestone 05: 55: 00 Accident Between Line 9 & 10
Station #4 Medical Assist 20 Muir, Fergushills
February 11, 2005 Rugby 20: 13: 00 Call Estates
Station #1 Motor Vehicle 316 Shanty Bay Road
Februarv 11, 2005 Shanty Bav 21:45: 00 Accident
Station #2 Motor Vehicle Highway 11 NIB,
Februarv 12, 2005 Hawkestone 18: 21: 00 Accident Between Line 12 & 13
Station #2 Medical Assist 15 Popular Cres.
Februarv 12, 2005 Hawkestone 20: 10:00 Call
Station #2 Tree Fire 211 Eight Mile Point
February 13, 2005 Hawkestone 19: 53: 36 Road
Station #1 Motor Vehicle Highway 11 @ Line 6
Februarv 14, 2005 Shanty Bav 08:40: 12 Accident
Station #1 MVC, Cancelled Highway 11 @ Line 6
Februarv 14, 2005 Shanty Bav 09: 36: 18 (called for clean-uo)
Station #1 Motor Vehicle Highway 11 SIB, @
Februarv 15, 2005 Shanty Bav 21:08:43 Accident Line 1 South
Station #3 Medical Assist 90 Highland Drive,
February 15, 2005 Horseshoe 12:20:00 Call Unit 2069
Station #5 Flooded 1231 Line 15 North
Februarv 16, 2005 Warminster 04: 10: 00 Basement
Station #1 Alarm - No Fire, 1899 Ridge Road
Februarv 16, 2005 Shanty Bav 06: 05:00 Malfunction West
Station #1 Medical Assist 151 Line 5 North
February 16, 2005 Shanty Bav 12:25: 05 Call
Station #$ Alarm - No Fire, Moonstone Public
February 17, 2005 Moonstone 14:30:00 Accidental School
Station #3 Vehicle Fire 1101 Horseshoe $ 2,000.00 L
Februarv 18, 2005 Horseshoe 13:46:33 Vallev Road $ .OOS
Station #2 Four-wheeler on Ice, Bottom at 2284
Februarv 18, 2005 Hawkestone 16:06:00 IcelWater Rescue Lakeshore Road East
Station #2 Small Truck Fire, Bottom of Line 8 UNKNOWN
Februarv 18, 2005 Hawkestone 18:55:00 Fully Involved North
.
F.D. Report 2005 - 09
DATE STATION TIME TYPE LOCATION DAMAGE
Station #5 Motor Vehicle Line 12 North I
Februarv 19, 2005 Warminster 17:24: 17 Accident
Station #3 Medical Assist 7 Green Mountain I
February 21. 2005 Horseshoe 08: 10: 00 Call Court
Station #4 Medical Assist 8 Clairmont, Fergus I
Februarv 22, 2005 Rugby 17: 10:00 Call Hills Estate
Station #2 Burning 28 Forest Plain
Februarv 24, 2005 Hawkestone 18:45: 00 Complaint Road
Station #2 Medical Assist 358 Line 11 South
Februarv 24, 2005 Hawkestone 22: 35: 00 Call
Station #2 Motor Vehicle Line 10 South
February 25, 2005 Hawkestone 19:07:42 Accident ,
Station #3 Alarm - No Fire, 90 Highland Drive,
Februarv 26, 2005 Horseshoe 08: 10: 00 Accident I Cooking Unit 2094
Station #2 Alarm - No Fire, 159 lakeshore Road
Februarv 26, 2005 Hawkestone 18: 10:37 Accidental I Cooking East
Station #3 Structure Fire 27 Huronwoods $ 260,000.00 l i
Februarv 26, 2005 Horseshoe 21:44: 00 Drive $ 40,000.00 S I
Station #6 Snowmobile Line 7 North, South of I
Februarv 26, 2005 Moonstone 02: 00: 00 Accident Moonstone Road I
Station #5 Medical Assist 11 Conder Drive I
February 27, 2005 Warminster 19:11:23 Call
Structure and Vehicle Fire
Dollar Value Lost Dollar Value Saved
$ 270,000.00 $ 40,000.00
Medical Calls
2005 2004
12 13
.
Monthlv Fire Report for February. 2005
Trainina Sessions
Station #1 Shanty Bay 2 Station #3 Horseshoe 2
Station #2 Hawkestone 2 Station #4 Rugby 2
Station #5 Warminster 2 Station #6 Moonstone 2
Inspection Record for the Month (includina Fire Prevention I Public Education)
Commercial 2 Residential/ Bed & Breakfast 3
Industrial/ Mercantile 2 Schools / Assembly / Church 1
Woodstove 2 Daycare / Camps / Hall Tours 2
Comments or Recommendations bv Fire Chief and/or Deputy Fire Chief
Extra training / Seminars and Events Attended
Testing with Point to Point, New Radio Frequency
Trainer Facilitators' Meeting
Captains Oral Exam
Emergency Measures of Ontario Seminar / Presentation
Fire Prevention / Public Education Meeting
Respectfully submitted,
Lynn Burness,
Secretary, Fire and Emergency Services
C.A.O. Comments: Date:
C.A.O Dept.
Head
~
~
<,<;;!~~~~'$\-
,:f;,~----~_.--,,-~-~4t;~~,
/f4' h __2:.;C ~,"
~= ., 9z~.
~o. ' . '" ~~
@>- ' ,f., _ 41 . ,"'" T,
,"' . .z;. '
\f!7 _,,-" , :1;'\:-'"
~~~,~:;ii:~$';1
,~~~
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
REPORT
Dept. Report No. To: Prepared By:
FD - 2005 - 08 co~j~ Joe Casey, Director of
'J7k ~ Fire & Emergency
?..;
" Services
"
Subject: Department:
Council City of Barrie Fire Fire and Emergency
Department Agreement Services
C.ofW. for Dispatching Date: March 21, 2005
Township of Oro-
Medonte Fire and
Motion Emergency Services A.M. File #:
#
Date: RolI#:
II BACKGROUND: II
In 2004 a copy of the new Fire and Emergency SeNices Dispatching Agreement
was received for review from the City of Barrie; the term of which is January 1,
2004 for a period of 5 years. Concerns with the new contract were expressed by
the Township and other Fire Departments in surrounding municipalities. Before
committing to signing the new agreement, a meeting was arranged with all
concerned Fire Departments and the City of Barrie to review the agreement and
address the expressed concerns. The current contract reflects costing at $1.30
per capita and a rate of interest on past due accounts of 1.25%.
~
I ANALYSIS: II
One of the main concerns dealt with was the cost of dispatching. Per the former
agreement, all fire departments were being billed (semi-annually) for 2004 at a
rate of $1.30 per capita. As noted in the correspondence from the City of Barrie
dated January 19, 2005 (Attachment 1), the new costing for dispatching for 2005
will be $1.37 per capita. Also, to reflect the City of Barrie's policy, past due
accounts will be charged interest at a rate of 1.5%. These new rates begin
January 1, 2005, per Sue Dawson, Manager of Communications, City of Barrie.
All other concerns have been addressed.
It is therefore recommended to Council that the Township enter into the Fire
Dispatching Agreement with the City of Barrie (Attachment 2).
II RECOMMENDATION(S): II
1. THAT Report No. FD - 2005 - 08 be received and adopted.
2. THAT the Township enter into the Fire and Emergency SeNices Dispatching
Agreement with the City of Barrie from January 1, 2004 for a term of five
years.
3. THAT the Clerk bring forward the appropriate by-law for Council's
consideration.
Respectfully submitted,
(;
/ i i' / n
t i fi UI\
! ' ~-\ _ L i r---1'\J.,) \
JJ~\cf~e)\ ~ire ~hief
Oro"\Medorite Fire\~nd Emergency SeNices
C.A.O. COMMENTS: ~(
DATE:. . <0 Dc:,
rIAR-17-2005 10:43 BARRIE FIRE P.04/05
! .-:4'
h1:rtJe{II'It'!::f I
Fire Chief p,o, BOX 400
R.D. HICKEY BARRIE, ONTARIO
OfIict': (705) nS~1271 ~r,g;rK_Qti!') L4M 4TS
Flr~ Prl:.vcntion & Tninini:
(705) 721>-3199 TIlE CORPORATION OF THf ('{TV OF MRRIE
fAX (70S) 728-4439 Barrie Fin:: J1nd (mcr~(ncy Service
"Committed to Sen'ke ExcdlcnCL'''
January 19, 2005
Chief Joe Casey
Orc-Madonte Township Fire Department
P.O. Box 100
Oro, Ontario
LOL 2XO
Dear Chief Casey:
Barrie Fire & Emergency Service is pleased to have our new Contract in place for Emergency
Fire Dispatch Services. During the discussion phase and in reference to the Public Fire Safety
Guideline (PFSG 04-64A-12 - Communications Best Practices) below you will find the
Communications Best Practices selected for use in the Barrie Fire & Emergency Service
Communications Centre. This best practice will be used this year and will result in a Standard
Operating Guideline for Communications Operators.
Barrie Fire & Emergency Service Communications Operators will, under normal conditions,
have the call taking and dispatching process from creation of call to first set of tones completed
within 45seconds for the call types of structure fire and fire alarm.
Barrie Fire & Emergency Service Communications Operators will, under normal conditions.
have the call taking and dispatching process from creation of call to first set of tones completed
within 90 seconds for all other call types.
Circumstances that will delay either of these times will Include call taking issues such as: caller
not able to give a municipal address, general information for a highway call. calls received on
the wrong telephone line, cell callers, use of a common street name instead of posted street
name. etc. Calls that will not verify in the computer aided dispatch system because of mapping
issues may be delayed and calls into paid agreement areas currently take In excess of the 45
seconds when completing the process for 2 departments simultaneously. We will continue to
put together a Standard Operating Guideline to handle as many situations as possible.
We will continue to work on training that will assist us in achieving these benchmarks within the
Communications Division.
Further to Article 3 "Review and Increase In Fees" of the current contract and my previous letter
dated October 14, 2004 please find below our Justification for raising the fees for dispatching 5%
for the 2005 calendar year,
"THE PEOPLE ARE THE CITY"
t'IAR-17-2885 18:4.3 BARRIE FIRE DEPT. P.05/0S
r
"
. Dispatched calls have fluctuated between 2000 and 2004. We have experience
percentage increases between 14 and 23 percent and most recently an slight decrease
of 4% in actual dispatched calls from Barrie Fire Control.
. Actual telephone call received have also fluctuated between 50,000 to 74,000 calls
coming into our centre in a year. We have continued to try to Improve the
communications ~ntre to allow for the best possible conditions for our operators to
perform their duties.
. Training of operators continues with Incident Management Training, Haz-Mat Training
and other APCO courses.
. Operating Expenses - the salaries of the operators alone have increased 14.36% since
2000 and the contract is currently under negotiation for 2005.
. No percentage increase in fees during the last contract.
We therefore feel that the 5% increase allowed within the contract is reasonable for 2005. If you
have any specific questions. please contact myself of Sue Dawson. Manager of
Communications.
Thank you. -
fl'/~
R.D. Hickey,
Fire Chief
_" "fi ,-...., ....
:1
TOTAL P.0S
r1AR-17-2005 10:42 BARRIE FIRE DEPT.
P.0.3/05
.
City Council Minute. -9- July 5,2004
04-A-340 Continued .-.
--
AMENDMENT 1/3
Moved by: Councillor. l.R. Moore
Seconded by: Councillor, A.V.G. Smith
That motion 04-0.405 of General Committee Report No. 33, Seotion "C" regariling the
Fire Dispa.tch Agreement be =aded by adding paragraph 112 as follows:
"That the fee charged for past due accounts as specified in items J b., 3 b. an.:! 4 b. of
Schedule "C" of th.e Fire and Emergency Dispalch Agreement be changed from 1.25%
per monrh to 1.5% per month to reflect City ofBame Policy as established by motion 86-
G-75 1."
CARRIED
AMENDMENT #4
Moved by: Councillor, P.W. Brown
Seconded by: Councillor. D. Aspden
That motion 04-G-407 of General Committee Report No. 33, Section "C" regarding the
City of Barrie Employment L!IIlds Conve!'1!ion Study be d~erred one week.
WITHDRAWN
AMENDMENT #5
TMI. pumuQI1t to Subsection 31(1) of the Procedural By-law. Councillor, D. Aspden
objected ro motion Q4..G-407 of General Committee Report No. 33. Section "C"
regarding the City of Barrie EmpJoymClJt Lands Convmion Study a.cd requested that i!
be Tabled. COWlcillor. A.V.G. Smith, Councillor. P.W. Brown. and Councilor, J. Moore
also objected.
AMENDMENT #6
Moved by: Councillor. P. W. Brown
Seconded by: Councillor, L.M. Stracban
That motion 04-0-409 of General Commitlee Repon No. 33, Section HC" regarding Pine
Drive Read Itnprovemenl3 and L:>cal Area Ssnit.a.1y Servicing be amended as follows:
"Tha! water and sewage servicinS not proc/!ed UlJJ/!9S the citizen petition application
becomes successful."
LOST
Upon the Cj\lestiol:l of the adoption of the original motion moved by Councillor. J. R. Moore and seconded
by COUllcilJor, A.V.G. Stnith, it was CARRIED AS AMENDED by Amendments #2. 3 and 5. (Nole:
motion 04-0-407 of General Committee RepOIt No. 33, Section "C" regArding the City of Bmrie
Emplnyment Lands Cnov"minn Study ~ TABLED In accordance with Amendment #5.)
TOTAL P. 82
H #
. ( '-{'-rAc. 1-17'11 GN '1 ,;:Z
THIS AGREEMENT made this day of ,2004
BETWEEN:
THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF BARRIE
(hereinafter referred to as "Barrie")
- and -
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
(hereinafter referred to as "Municipality")
WHEREAS Section 20(1) of the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c. 25, authorizes a
municipality to enter into an agreement with one or more municipalities to jointly
provide, for their joint benefit, any matter which all of them have the power to provide
within their own boundaries.
AND WHEREAS by-laws have been duly enacted by the corporate parties hereto
respectively to authorize an agreement between the said parties relative to Barrie
providing certain dispatching and information and communication technology services to
the Municipality.
NOW THEREFORE in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreement herein
contained, it is mutually agreed between the parties hereto, as follows:
Dispatching
1. Barrie shall provide emergency fire dispatch services ("Dispatching") to the
Municipality. Dispatching shall include the following:
a. Responding to 911 telephone calls and non-911 telephone calls with
respect to the area set out in Schedule "A" ("Dispatch Area") attached
hereto;
b. Alerting the members of the Municipality Fire Department of an
emergency;
c. Communicating with the Municipality Fire Department under both
emergency and non-emergency conditions;
d. Communicating with the Municipality Fire Department regarding the
potential need for mutual aid and monitoring the level of an on-going
emergency activity;
e. Communicating with other agencies during an emergency upon the
request of the Municipality Fire Department incident commander;
I
~( -
f. Provide information, data and other resources during emergencies and on
a day to day basis; and
g. Maintain a log of all dispatch calls received, in particular, record the times
and information set out in the "Process" section of the Ministry of the
Solicitor General Public Fire Safety Guidelines No. PSFG 04-64A-03 and
as defined by Barrie Fire & Emergency Service Standard Operating
Guidelines.
Fees
2. The Municipality shall pay to Barrie the fees and additional fees as set out in
Scheduled "c" attached hereto.
Review and Increase in Fees
3. Prior to January 31 st of each year, Barrie may unilaterally increase the Rate (as
defined in Schedule "C") by no greater than 5%. Barrie shall provide notice to
the Municipality of said increase. The increase shall be effective February 1 st of
the respective year. Any increase greater than 5% shall be by mutual agreement
of the parties.
Indemnification
4. The parties agree that each of them undertakes no duty of care with respect to the
other party, and neither party shall be required to indemnify the other as a result
of any provision of services under this Agreement. Both parties agree that they
shall maintain adequate liability insurance with respect to any claims by any party
for physical or personal damages or negligence, as the case may be, on behalf of
the parties, and their respective agents, officers, employees and assigns.
Dispatch Backup
5. Municipality agrees that it will assume control of its own dispatch centre on a
temporary basis if and when required and for such period of time as may be
required by Barrie.
CAD Mapping
6.
a. Municipality shall provide Barrie, on a continuous basis, all necessary
information for the operation of the dispatch system, including but not
limited to maps, single line road network data, hydrant locations, water
main information, assessment data, any and all other pertinent data.
Updates to the mapping and data shall be provided by the Municipality to
Barrie, at minimum, on a quarterly basis in the months of February, May,
August, and November.
b. Municipality acknowledges and agrees that it provides the County of
Simcoe (the "County") with mapping information and data for its region.
2
l .~
c. Municipality acknowledges and agrees that the County provides Barrie
with mapping information and a limited license to modify the data for the
purpose of creating an integrated and seamless map ("CAD Mapping")
across different regions including the area described in Schedule "A". The
CAD Mapping is used to facilitate the Dispatching and management of
fire calls by Barrie on behalf of the Municipality.
d. Municipality shall provide the County in a timely manner with updates to
the maps for the area set out in Schedule "A".
e. Municipality shall forthwith notify both the County and Barrie of any
mapping inaccuracies they discover.
f. Municipality shall forthwith notify both the County and Barrie of any
changes to the names of existing roads.
g. Barrie shall forthwith notify Municipality of any errors or inaccuracies,
discovered by Barrie, in the Municipality mapping. Municipality shall be
responsible to provide both the County and Barrie with an updated and
corrected map(s) in a timely fashion.
h. Barrie makes no representations, covenants or warranties with respect to
the mapping information or the CAD Mapping. Barrie specifically does
not warrant that the mapping information or the CAD Mapping is free of
any inaccuracies or errors. Barrie relies entirely on the County for the
accuracy and completeness of the data provided.
1. Municipality agrees that it will at all times indemnify and save harmless
Barrie, its employees, officers, servants, agents and assigns, including the
members of the of the Barrie Fire Department ITom any and all claims,
actions suits or demands for damage or otherwise arising from any errors,
modifications or inaccuracies in the CAD Mapping, or from any misuse,
misinterpretation or misapplication thereof, whether due to the negligence
of Barrie, its employees, officers, servants, agents or assigns.
j. Barrie shall provide to the Municipality information and communication
technology support as set out in Schedule "B" attached hereto and
Municipality shall pay the fees set out in Schedule "C".
k. Municipality shall provide mapping to Barrie in a shp format compliant
with the standards requested by Barrie.
Dispatch Data Backup
7.
a. Barrie shall backup the computer dispatching data in SQL database
formatting. Barrie shall annually provide the Municipality with the data on
3
compact disk ("CD") prior to the anniversary of this Agreement. The
Municipality shall remit to Barrie the fees set out in Schedule "c" attached
hereto.
b. At any time, the Municipality may request a copy of their data. Barrie
shall provide same, within a reasonable amount of time, at the fees set out
in Schedule "c" attached hereto. The data will be provided on a CD in
SQL database formatting.
Term
8.
a. It is agreed between the parties hereto that the terms of this Agreement
shall come into force and take effect from the 1st day of January, 2004 and
remain in full force and effect for a period of five (5) years and thereafter
until amended or replaced by a new agreement.
b. It is agreed that any amendment to or replacement of this Agreement shall
be worded so as to take full force and effect on the 1st day of January for
the year in which the amendment or new agreement is made.
c. Either party may, at any time, upon ninety (90) days written notice to the
other, terminate this Agreement. Any monies owing to Barrie, and not
paid, shall forthwith be paid to Barrie, prior to the date of said termination.
Other Agreemeuts
9. The Municipality acknowledges that Barrie may enter into similar agreements to
this Agreement with other municipalities. As a result of such further agreements
or the increased volume of the dispatched messages arising out of this Agreement,
either party may determine that additional equipment or manpower is necessary
for the proper functioning of the dispatch system. Should either party so
determine, then both parties shall enter into negotiations to determine the
necessity of such additional equipment or manpower and if, as a result of such
negotiations, the parties are unable to agree as to such necessity, then this
Agreement shall be terminated subject to the provisions set out in section 8( c)
above.
Arbitration
10.
a. In the event of any disputes, differences or question arising between the
parties hereto, arising out of this agreement, whether during the term of
this agreement or after, then each such dispute, difference or question shall
be submitted to and settled by arbitration and the decision of the arbitrator
appointed to deal with such matters shall be accepted by the parties hereto.
b. The arbitration in each of the cases as hereinbefore mentioned shall be
conducted by a single arbitrator if the parties hereto agree upon one or
otherwise by an arbitrator appointed by a Judge of the Supreme Court of
4
Ontario. The arbitration shall be conducted in accordance with the
provisions of The Arbitration Act (Ontario), and any statutory amendments
thereto for the time being in effect. It is hereby agreed that it shall be a
condition precedent to any action being instituted by either party hereto
against the other or of any liability in connection therewith that the matter
must be first referred to arbitration as herein provided for disposition.
Compliance with Laws and Confidentiality
II. Barrie and the Township shall perform their responsibilities hereunder in
compliance with all applicable laws, including all laws pertaining to the
protection of personal infoID1ation about individuals and individuals' access to
personal information about themselves.
Agreement Binding
12. This Agreement shall be binding upon and enure to the benefit of the parties
hereto, and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors and
assIgns.
Severability
13. In the event that any covenant, provision or term of this Agreement should be at
any time be held by any competent tribunal to be void or unenforceable, then the
Agreement shall not fail but the covenant, provision or term shall be deemed to be
severable from the remainder of this Agreement which shall remain in full force
and effect mutates mutandis.
Headings
14. The section headings contained herein are for purposes of convenience only, and
shall not be deemed to constitute a part of this Agreement or to affect the meaning
or interpretation of this Agreement in any way.
Force Majeure
15. Neither party shall be liable for damages caused by delay or failure to perform its
obligations under this Agreement where such delay or failure is caused by an
event beyond its reasonable control. The parties agree that an event shall not be
considered beyond one's reasonable control if a reasonable business person
applying due diligence in the same or similar circumstances under the same or
similar obligations as those contained in the Agreement would have put in place
contingency plans to either materially mitigate or negate the effects of such event.
If a party seeks to excuse itself from its obligations under this Agreement due to a
force majeure event, that party shall immediately notify the other party of the
delay or non-performance, the reason for such delay or non-performance and the
anticipated period of delay or non-performance.
Notice
16. Any notice required pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and delivered
personally, facsimile transmissions ("FAX") or sent by registered mail (with
proper postage) to the following addresses:
5
!
L ~ \
To the City of Barrie at:
P.O. Box 400
70 Collier Street
Barrie, ON L4M 4T5
Attention: City of Barrie Fire and Emergency Services, Communications
Manager
Fax: (705) 728-4439
To the Township ofOro-Medonte at:
P.O. Box 100
Oro, Ontario LOL 2XO
Attention: Clerk
Fax: (705) 487-0133
Or to such other addresses either of the parties may indicate in writing to the
other. Any notice given in accordance with this shall be deemed to have been
received upon delivery, if delivered personally, at the time of transmission if sent
by FAX or five (5) days after posting, if sent by regular mail.
Entire Agreement
17. Except as otherwise stated herein, this Agreement constitutes the entire agreement
of the parties, it supersedes any previous agreement whether written or verbal.
6
~
Applicable Law
18. This Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of
Ontario and the laws of Canada applicable therein.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have hereunto affixed their Corporate
Seals under the hand of its officers duly authorized in that behalf.
THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF BARRIE
R. J. Hamilton MAYOR
John R. Sisson CLERK
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
Name:
Title:
I have authority to bind the corporation
Name:
Title:
I have authority to bind the corporation
7
SCHEDULE nAil
5~ojf(J'W'~
'1/ I I' iJ- ~ ,...........0 \ lJ ..~
TJ Y .,r f;L ., "'Tf\ 't~,._" 'cd" ,1 f1::1" legend
r,,~ ." VASEYR ~...
r' ~ LolalldConoossiros
- ~ " )~ """ci,,,,'Bw""ri~
i ,"", ,~ ~ DSettlement
- ..~ 20! * * .. ~ ' ! ~ Roa<l.byOwn.Bhlp
~ 19 ~ ~ 2 ~ .. ffi ~ ~ "~>~m'COUNTY
-'rrn~ '" !" I ...
\., 18' I '% ~ i;j !' i ~LOCAL
~ '1 001J. :r '1' ~ -PROVINC!.'Y-
-l\ """FlIiMO 11 t: '" ,..
IB ._SHR oJ'};.. i!\
" ~ '.. .'6.... ." . r I,..,
- I/, 'l~::fll~'''~~'~:=: ~" f7"'; ~'~ ~N" ::' ~ SE:ER~:
\ · ,~~- 113 ~ V V~ \\ I !
~<~ .. 12 '"
12 'Ij,,,,1!> ~ :;;
= 1'1b"'- ;>. ""'-"""r-" """"" lJ'-. I n!mSl-"!Ro.III Nr-- ~
56 ,-~ v:. " 10
55 E ,i4 W.' W ~ 9 ~
54 (;fo&'/& ~ 9 ~ """""""Qo,(> tu
53 " ~ ~ q~ 8
52 8 ~ J?~
I 51 ",,,"SR ,.OS't$r 1
~ /. ,~-- ~J\ -e-.
1 t r 5 ~~ ! ~ 5
~RI ~~TER * 4 ~~ t"&. 00 ~ I:c::
44 · j I' 3 .;;. ~~ ',> , , ! z
438' ~:::.~ 2"~ fO%O ~ f&" ~Oh.' j,~
42! SIq~ '/1'.""~$EVAJ..'-"':~.. I '" "'"
.. ~- ~C~~'[ ~ru ~ ~..
''''''TO'''' ,'" .. T' 4D ~ "'" '\.
II ,11'<>i>1~ ""....~, ( DO 'liTE \;'L~ 6><>88
~!W""~" ~ {\'" ilv
!i ~'w'" 4 8~0" & ~ ~
~ ~i;: I--:!-'&"., '<9<>I'~ ./ Y '-
,I 33 5 ,~~~ @ "'" fJ
'" 6 .~" r- !
~RD. "DtM!MZRO F 7 co ~ i ~ r-.!.J ~
' 1<.. '" F "'
~ 'i 30 ~ ~ ::JV ~ v S VI ~ VII ~ VIII ;; IX )( XI XII Xlii XlV ~
hi, I 29 ~II ~m i ~ ;i! ;i! ;;: ~
' 28 ;i! 9~ ~ W"'"
27"1 ;:t:
~ . . \,. ..'0 g;; "","/ 'h ........
~ - ;; ,;: 11 " ~'~< ~~.... j!! !?".96 'f1'''8! ~I} ?< ....
~ i I 23 12 0'.9<>1' i<; i i !' ! ,'>>" I'
wM , i ,,;;. 13 , <>8 b ' / ~
itt, "01>'l<1>l>. 14 i"0 ~
~r f><X)lEs Ii 20 ~
; 19 15
I "f-' ',",~ Y ~ [7
i 17 16 ~ ~ ~
'- IT /' . U
c 15 :!' '"
II II Ii 14 1~ (; ~
'Ii I 13 19 '~I);' /v /'
t 12 (9 lAKESHDREBp
....i.. 11 20 ~
~< ./rr ~,8 ~ <1 _ On * ! ! ~ ~;c:(~Y I~'"
i'Q " O&jf,." !//' ~ c'"
~<$' 2 ~ 'i ~ . , ~
" - 23 ~ ~ ~Ol) ~.. 15! ~ """
' ! !"!' '"~e 8 '-::''''?
~5 1./""r,.-" -----'-)1 ~
, .. . I .~/!// -= .xA,
~~ . .~
"'''' J .~..\.',. __'0 0,'''".. ',,<
~F.
Scale: 1 : 160,000 This"",p ,;""riJj",lwJ~"'m!,<m.>frd;y>or"I><r,pm4"...d
~ \pE:. ~~ ~'i,I"..,"h""'Ji""" u".j."i'Jft,~~ 'kC..-"",,-,,>!Si,m-"'"
Created: June 2002 ~ <,,,,,,,<oo,ry.,,.~
j: . 't r.-J11{omta';""'&r-riC""p"."",-,-CUNC2W1
County of Simcoe ;!j . 'i Pro<iJJ(Mii~panIUNbtlkl!1t<?rr"""~Clul'J"'B"'''~&OrJItJlJ
:;0 .,; l",h""O"'"""M'-""'~y4N<mu,,JII=~""'~3
GIS Department 9.... ..! Copynl!'<,!t;(,Iuw..,-rn"',,200)
00.51 2Kiiometers 705-726-9300 ~ i- Thin.."p;. no, a h~"}~.......~,.F", """" ,'!for>>oah.,., c~!I i705J 726.<)JOO#,
...,.....~~ "'I',...."'.~""~_JJ..<_~."".UJ
--
8
.
~ I
SCHEDULE "B"
INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY
SERVICES AND FEES (Levell)
Support by Barrie
1. Barrie's Information and Communication Technology Department ("ICT") shall
provide the following services to the Municipality:
a. Installation and initial configuration of Checkpoint client to allow access to all
modules of Firehouse Software Records Management System ("Firehouse")
and all Municipality databases;
b. The ability of the Municipality to print of Firehouse reports through this
remote connection;
c. The ability of the Municipality attach files to Firehouse records through this
remote connection;
d. The ability of the Municipality to produce trip tickets; and
e. Barrie Helpdesk service for the above and for general Firehouse usage
questions ITom Monday to Friday during City of Barrie regular office hours.
Responsibilities ofthe Municipality
2. Municipality shall have the following responsibilities:
a. Municipality shall attempt to have Firehouse issues resolved internally prior to
contacting Barrie Helpdesk;
b. Municipality staff shall provide timely, accurate and reasonable descriptions
of their problems to Barrie Helpdesk staff in order to facilitate the support
processes;
c. Municipality staff shall contact Barrie Helpdesk staff by phone at (705) 726-
4242 ext#4599 or by email helpdesk(aJ,citv.barrie.on.ca for all requests
regardless ofthe priority or subsequent actions taken;
9
.
SCHEDULE "C" ~
FEES
1. Dispatching Fees
The following fees shall be applicable for Dispatching:
a. For Dispatching, Municipality shall pay to Barrie, semi-annually, as
invoiced by Barrie, a per capita rate (the "Rate") of One Dollar and Thirty
Cents ($1.30) for the entire Dispatch Area. The Rate applies to all citizens
protected by the Municipality Fire Department or under any agreement
with other municipal fire departments.
b. Charges per item (a) to be paid within thirty days of receipt of the invoice.
Interest at the rate of H5"1o per month shall accrue on past due accounts.
kS'
Additional Fees
c. Municipality shall be responsible for all charges and costs billed to Barrie
directly ITom Bell Canada or other parties which are properly attributable
to Municipality. Barrie shall identify and forward to Municipality
invoices with respect to same which shall be paid by Municipality
forthwith upon receipt thereof
d. Municipality agrees to pay any labour costs incurred by Barrie with
respect to any Barrie employees who are subpoenaed to give evidence at
any inquest, hearing, court case, etc. associated with the dispatching
process set out in this Agreement.
2, Backup Fees
a. The Municipality shall annually remit to Barrie $50.00 for the backup CD.
b. The Municipality shall remit to Barrie $50.00 for each additional request
for backup data.
3, Fees for ICT Support (Levell)
The following fees shall be applicable for ICT support:
a, Municipality shall pay to Barrie, semi-annually, as invoiced by Barrie, a
per capita rate (the "Support Fee") of Ten Cents ($0.10) for the entire
Dispatch Area.
b. Charges per item (a) to be paid within thirty days of receipt of the invoice.
Interest at the rate oft:2'5"'/o per month shall accrue on past due accounts.
IS'
10
. .
. ~
c. Prior to January 31st of each year, Barrie may unilaterally increase the
Support Fee by no greater than 5%. Barrie shall provide notice to the
Municipality of said increase. The increase shall be effective February 1st
of the respective year. Any increase greater than 5% shall be by mutual
agreement of the parties.
11
~
I
1 _"C
"C '"
",-
't: m I
~ ....
'" '"
u C
I I", a
'" a
1 - LO LO
I e: , ,
I '" ~ ~ ,
~ ~ ,
I E ~ ~ ,
1- '" , ,
N ~
'e: II) a N
1::1 ~
::I to <J:>
10 J:> , ,
iu ~ ~
I~ II) C1J C1J '"
C , , ~
~ ~
1- a a Q)
"C a C> :c
'" N ro
- .... .Si!
Ie: II) LO ~
II) ::I '" '" N ~
'" 0 ::I '"
~I ~ cr ro
'" 2]
D::
JI ro
Ig
I~
",'
> e: 'ro
IQ)
'iij 0 '.c;
:i: 1 "" ,-
""
0 Q)I I""
C.I
- E! iE
II) I 0' '.0
- I ::I
II) I ul UJ
'"
::I 1 ro .9
cr e: "0
'" '" 0 Q)
D:: II) Q) ~ u;
, 0 () Q)
I e:
, Q.I '~ ~ ~
,-, Q)
::II Q) 'E Q)
0- (/) ~
Q)
e: I .0
~ UJ
e:
.;;; 0
ro ~
a. N
ro '"
i 'i:: ~
i O. i::
lEI I~ 0
iQ)' "0
':iE1 Ie: Q)
~! JI ,:;: , ~
_I I~ Q)
=1
._, f;
U, 1"0
"" 10 OJ
u.' m .c;
I I 113
I
I
I Ie:
::I
0
U
.0 .9
:::> "0
l5 'Q)
J:> 1"0
:::> 0 Ie:
I l5 '6 'Q)
ro IE
UJ 0:: IE
e: ~
0 :::> 10
<:: ::J '()
0 2 'Q)
~I t5 ro ~
.C I E .!!!
"2i u; ,..; ==
",I i5 i Q) 1B
, 'i::
en 0 I '~
~ ~ ro 0
0 0 m z
, ..; 1 1m
.. \
THE CORPORATION OF THE Ll'd -
". ,.,--:",--. -_-_~'.."... ,'.,.-," ".".~" '". - . _ _ 148 Line 75., Box 100
T' 0 W N .Q H I P Oro. Ontario LOL 2XO
~ 11 Phone (705)487.2171
~~Of J~~ :ww~:0~::8:;:I::
APPLICA TION FOR GRANT/SUBSIDY
NOTE: GRo\NTS/SUBSIDJES ARE NOT AUTOMATICALLY RENEWED EVERY YEAR.
NOTE: ORGANJZA TJONS MAYBE REQUJRED TO SUBMIT FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
NOTE: If additional space is required to complete your information, please use the attached
sheet.
Grant/Subsidy Request Amount $ s:;:? . C) c::>
PARTA'~' Orf!ani~7Iii~;,N7In'I!7I;,,jAiiiii~'snj,foij,l7Iti~j,
Organization ".
Name v.eo J),Srt.c...r L\.e>~ CL..U~ .
Address ? P. a€:>1'> y~
City (J/CO Prov. ~ Postal Code tC-P&-!.. ~()
Contact ~/WI: ~ex/ TeJephone
E-mail ~"Fax
---
PARiir" OTf!l1l1iz7IlioIIGeni?idl111(ormation
Number of / rOut of Town Membership Fee #60
Members V U Residents If Applicable If' I
Geographic Area ,.... _' Date .
Served (3J~~ ~fl<P /&?~h~ Formed ,+H/&- /:1n.
OutEne the mission, purpose and ~bjectiv.es of your ~rganization. '
7Jt>e~vJ;h ~.rA,?,,~ 71' //'"Jt?v/",:< #l?t/~1 ~",'2' YC.-&--> /ft
..-: d tllPiV/!J'/fI #W' ~ '/'Mt-Fr IP J'&r-C: ~ ;"S' VffWt~
III J7h (,p/N/Nt/d;~ #r'/.J &Y7&^"4&:S; ~:7 C'/7'?o:>_/l/ y y, vl'7(' /1'1- $'vC,H
/f1t.ffl /1'5 S'/y/lr ~o /YiF~PI'7 0>".u,(/,0ff7e>~ /;)//'!€t'=-n:'"'S ~r.J D;,,;r~f/f
f/tnt-r1 .r !le~/Caf17;'A. /
.
Type of Organization (i.e. Registered Charity, Non-Profit Organization, no status, etc. ) and registration ,
number if applicable. 'y/o"';: )Jztl"crr.
Other Sources of Revenue (include amounts that have been received or that are anticipated - other
grants/subsidies, private funding, etc.).
r e;P &a-WA Ep,v*.e4-7); ~ ~ ~ ,c;..,.. ~I/:;}t ~ ,,hvo
I/'Yf'C. IW m-,N- {7i/< Mrt';;:k.tlf (l 6(/",.(.5 {'~I; / ".... ,...,-n. #-7
crvrfEi1(}It'lIJ, nltvJ'/"rH~- 17~/rd0 '/JI r!at {" ~ k. /
Purpose for which the current grant/subsidy, if approved, would be used. Give complete details - (i.e.
project or event description, time frame, community benefits).
Do you currently receive other grants or subsidies from the Township (faciJjty subsidization,
photocopying, secretarial, etc.).
Previous grants/subsidies from the Township?
Amount Requested: $ /:I C'z.. .- Year of Request: z..c;x::><;/
Amount Approved: $ I'>L... .-c> Year of Approval: 2.J9~
PART C - Sif!nature of Authorized Of(icia/(s/
ht.;?'-"/c- ~~J. Date: ~c/,,/~.y.
Name & Position .
Date:
Name & Position
Note:
Personal information contained on this form is coJlected pursuant to the Municipal Freedom of
information and Protection of Privacy Act, and wiJl be used for the purpose of determining eligibility for
grants. Questions about this coJlection should be directed to the Freedom of Information Coordinator,
The Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte, 148 Line 7 South, Box 100, Oro, Ontario, L{)L 2XO.
.
.
Please use tbis additional sheet (and attach more if required) to complete the information
requested on tbe Grant/Subsidy Application Form.
OutJine the mission, purpose and objectives of your organization.
Type of Organization (i.e. Registered Charity, Non-Profit Organization, no status, etc. ) and registration
number if appJicabJe.
Other Sources of Revenue (include amounts that have been received or that are anticipated - other
grants/subsidies, private funding, etc.).
Purpose for which the current grant/subsidy, if approved, would be used. Give complete details - (i.e.
project or event description, time frame, community benefits).
Do you currentJy receive other grants or subsidies from the Township (facility subsidization,
photocopying, secretarial, etc.).
Previous grants/subsidies from the Township?
Amount Requested: $ Year of Request:
Amount Approved: $ Year of ApprovaJ:
. ,~.,
-
THE CORPORATION OF THE
J48 Line 7 S.. Box 100
T 0 W N 8 11 I P Orc, Ontario LOL 2XO
Phone (70S) 487-2171
cgvOfJ~~~ Fax (70S) 487-0133
www.oro-rnedonte.ca
APPLICA nON FOR GRANT/SUBSIDY
NOTE: GRANTS/SUBSIDIES ARE NOT AUTOMATICALLY RENEWED EVERY YEAR.
NOTE: ORGANIZATIONS MAY BE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
NOTE: If additional space is required to complete your information, please use the attached
sheet.
GrantlSubsidy Request Amount $ WRIVI {JC, Or RE,v'TA /-.. Ct+ARC<s' Fe!\.
Oi..iJ TOWN ;+1'9'-'- >J WNG :96/::" AS
PART A...... ()rf!.aniz~iio"'No"',eo;,dAiid"e;ijiif;/;ii;;itio;' R:,''x')K ,:c
Organization
Name I3A/~RJ~ /I\.H (~ T G: l.IfC I<{(::;/)IO (1_,,-'-'1 i3
Address .,t") x .2$"'1-
U~L>
City bAR R I iZ Prov. o~r# Postal Code Llft"'l 4T4-
Contact Au:;XAtJORp fY1('f,UI RE T eJephone
E-mail Fax
PAiltiJ.;C ()"~(J;'iz(Jti(J1tGI!1JerjlljiltlJrinaiion
Number of Out of Town Membership Fee . C' (,>
Members 3<;" Residents :lJ.:: If Applicable "'dO
Geographic Area r.J6R.TH / SC<.iJi-l Date
Served .c;,MCDt.:- Fonned , q&,'9,
/
Outline the mission, purpose and objectives of your organization.
To VGVL""I.. 0 P ') F't/'::'~ Il~,e AN iNT,~Re51 IN /-fAi'1 R('1,)it'), 10 VElIEt..I'P rlN
i r.J be;:fJEf',v /)GrJ T I\h,- T0()Rk..' F- n- ''''t. - -rit2' - TO Pf;'ON 0"11." Pa/iJ..I<2
c' r"D,...- G ,f- Ihi IIC"'>
Sit FETY " A5SiS T IN lIMES CP D 1'5195 TIE/?, TD fJ 170 1/ IJ;J <': A ;:: 0/t'1..J /-f
/::0/-1.. ;' A 14f11G.l../f-<, " /V'1 DI 0 c,PE'Rq TONS TO t..::6t0G,t<E'(-j..-'/7C- ~t (? xC /../ A t1) (', rc-
II)E5.A S '") II\J~OR HA T' e>fV';
.
~
Type of Organization (i.e. Registered Charity, Non-Profit Organization, no status, etc. ) and registration
number if appJicabJe.
NOt0- Pr<.oFli
cI0TAf.'1O CORPORAT/61tJ .d one 5'1/1./7 g (/98a)
Other Sources of Revenue (include amounts that have been received or that are anticipated - other
grants/subsidies, private funding, etc.).
Purpose for which the current grant/subsidy, if approved, would be used. Give complete details - (i.e.
project or event description, time frame, community benefits).
,
!3ult-,i)irv'{, d<;Pj") FCJrl J)/Sf't..,.q,/<; ."iHc>wCA"5'Il/C, A/I1ATe4re /~Aj)J{):S
;YlArv'/ /:::Ac(:'"15 ,0 /'5110125, :c,wr?//v4 .1 F'I""-"':; D,qv ': Ifc-I..i') /N
cu7/Jvof>!. \!<.O"j\.lqL;;", (PL€"I'!Sc ~""('. N07"'- /-1.1:' I~''''':J..':::' D',<;Y7f)
Do you currently receive other grants Or subsidies from the Township (facility subsidization,
photocopying, secretarial, etc.).
N6
Previous grants/subsidies from the Township?
Amount Requested: $ Year of Request: .-~
Amount Approved: $ Year of ApprovaJ:
Author! ed 0 ~
-~ 0~ ~~' @~~
Name & Position
-Jt;/lc/JI foAol V{C~ ?((s,dpf/f. Date: fYl(lJJI Bios-
Name & Position
Note:
Personal information contained on this form is coHected pursuant to the Municipal Freedom of
Information and Protection of Privacy Act, and wiH be used for the purpose of detennining eligibility for
grants. Questions about this collection should be directed to the Freedom of Jnfonnation Coordinator,
The Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte, ] 48 Line 7 South, Box] 00, Oro, Ontario, LOL 2XO.
.
.
.
Please use this additional sheet (and attach more if required) to complete the information
requested on the Grant/Subsidy Application Form.
Outline the mission, purpose and objectives of your organization.
Type of Organization (i.e. Registered Charity, Non-Profit Organization, no status, etc. ) and registration
number if applicable.
Other Sources of Revenue (include amounts that have been received or that are anticipated - other
grants/subsidies, private funding, etc.).
Purpose for which the current grant/subsidy, if approved, would be used. Give complete details - (i.e.
project or event description, time frame, community benefits). i'
f FIG-/.- i'J ])A Y - (Jr'; INi~/hJ,q'TIc>(tJ,qL. C.oHPE.T, Ii eN oPE/QATlrVc.. IN 51 (>1t.-/ .,/'~ 7 €'b
'l),9hTe-r< No/)<= " U Sf? D AS Pi<I7C71C,'/:- POI< 6t-uSRGErVCY /( C;-SJ~ 0 A.J 5 {;;::-
( Co H MWN Ie ,9Tlty/J ':,) IN nH~s of L..cc,qt.... DA INTEl"? rVA-7 /otV4 L
l;i5/q"::JTE~ Or:{ NEe D ,
Do you currentJy receive other grants or subsidies from the Township (facility subsidization,
photocopying, secretarial, etc.).
Previous grants/subsidies from the Township?
Amount Requested: $ Year of Request:
Amount Approved: $ Year of ApprovaJ:
ADOut US - tlame Alllaleur Kamo LIDD
<- BARRIE AMATEUR RADIO ClI
<t"'
IX'
~ About Us
.;:>
.r.z v W
Mission Statement I History I Meetings I Membership I Ham Courses I Events I AffiliatiOl
....-1 TIiif
Mission Statement
To develop and foster an interest in amateur radio in our community. To develop an independent
network of people and facilities to promote public safety and assist in times of disaster.
To provide a forum for Amateurs to congregate and exchange ideas and information.
-ti.::r' l..iiF
History
The club started as a loosely knit group of hobbyists in the mid 1960's and formally organized as a
club in 1968. At the time they were meeting in the basement of the old Registry Office building
which was located at the site of the old County Court House building in Barrie. At that time the
building was being used by the Emergency Measures Organization. Later with connections to
Georgian College meetings began at the College. In 1982 with the help of 10 of the active members
the organization was incorporated. The Club now meets at Zehrs community room 472 Bayfield St.
and provides service to the community and amateurs of central Ontario.
~r l.jj.
Meetings
The Club meets the second Tuesday of every month ( except December)
7:00 p.m. at Zehrs Community Room, Big Bay Point Road at Yonge Street..
On the Southwest corner of Yonge & Big Bay Point Road.
.f hiI'
Membership
The fee for individual membership is $20.00 per year
- or $30.00 for a Family membership ( immediate only)
~--j iliif
Ham Courses
For further information please contact Terry~rrt!tt " VA31<Lc;
http://www.barriearc.com/aboutus.htm 3/10/2005
About Us - tlarne Amateur KaOlO ClUb
.. (;() tl> TI>P()f Page
-iiliJ a
Events
The club participates in community events whenever possible. It varies from things like providing
communications for a Walk a Dog a Thon to having an information booth at community events.
Two events we are directly involved with are GOTA (Guides On The Air), and JOTA (Jamboree On
The Air). These are international events where we set up communications gear and let Gin Guides
and Scouts communicate with their counterparts in the rest of the wond.
GOTA is in the eany spring and JOTA is in the fall. Both are a good opportunity to see how long
distance radio communication is done
Now the premier event of the year is called Field Day. Field Day is sort of a practice session for
disaster communications. All over North America Amateur Radio groups, clubs, and individuals set
up their equipment in a simulated disaster mode using generators for power and setting up
antennas and operating gear in tents usually in a field, hence the name "Field Day". The object of
the exercise is to make as many contacts as possible with other Field Day competitors over a 24
hour period. The pace is pretty hectic during daylight hours, first setting up aU the gear and getting
prepared, then in the wee hours of the morning you see who the truly dedicated radio operators
are. It's a great opportunity to see radio communication at its finest. It also is an opportunity for
unlicensed enthusiasts to try their hand at using the equipment under the guidance of a licensed
operator. Field Day is on the 3rd or 4th weekend in June.
Give one of our contacts a call and try to get out to see it. All ages are welcome. .. CONTAc::TS
-iili.:J Ti;iP
Affiliations
The Barrie Amateur Radio Club along with many other clubs provide support to other public service
groups. Radio Amateurs of Canada, (RAe) is our national organization which provides a voice for
Amateurs with our Federal Government and internationally with the International
Telecommunications Union (ITU), and the International Amateur Radio Union (IARU). Two of the
branches of RAC that provide public service are, (ARES) Amateur Radio Emergency Service, and
(NTS) National Traffic System. ARES is an organization of licensed radio amateurs who have
registered their qualifications and equipment with RAC to provide communications in times of
disaster. NTS is an organization of licensed radio amateurs who provide a network of operators that
can relay formal message traffic around the wond. Both of these groups will usually be providing
their services to the Red Cross who coordinates the distribution of information to the public. One
important type of traffic for the Red Cross is the Registration and Inquiry information. That service
provides information to disaster victims and their friends and families to help reunite them.
Another recently formed public service group is Canadian Weather Amateur Radio Network
(CANWARN). It is a joint project between Environment Canada and local amateur radio groups. It is
an organization of licensed radio amateurs who are trained in the recognition of severe weather
conditions. Its main purpose is to observe weather conditions at the time when tornadoes are likely
to occur. When Environment Canada determines that there is a possible threat of tornadoes the
group is called into action. A number of amateur repeaters in the effected area are linked together
in a network. Network controllers are called into an amateur station set up at the Canada Weather
office. The trained weather spotters relay information to the weather office where the Weather
Specialist determines what reports go out to warn the public via TV and radio reports. It gets pretty
exciting hearing all the reports of things as they happen.
http://www.barriearc.com/aboutus.htm 3/1 0/2005
,
, . ,~
.
\ve
D\s~ -\0
C}\.ui ~ w"',~
~~'i\ \ ~ ,0.005
Hi Jen.
Here are some of the issues concerning our policing:
1. How many calis for service did we have in 2002, 2003, 2004
2. How many calis for service did Ramara, Severn and Springwater have in the same years
3. What was the cost of policing in 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004 for Oro-Medonte, Ramara, Severn and Springwater
4. What is the estimated cost for 2005 for the above four municipalities
5. How many officers are 'assigned' to the above municipalities
6. How many hours of actual pro-active patrol were performed in the above four municipalites in 2003, 2004.
7. How many hours of police officers time was used for report writing in 2003 and 2004
8. In 2001 Oro-Medonte build a Sate lite station at Horseshoe Valiey at a cost of $600,000 which the O.P.P. took over in
2002. It was estimated by the O.P.P. our policing costs would decrease by approximately $200,000 per year once they
moved into this office. We were advised that much of the savings would come from us not having to pay towards the
Orillia Detachment, which would lead to an increase in costs for Ramara and Severn. Based on this information why did
the cost of policing in Ramara decrease 9.4% in 2002 and in Severn by 1.9% while Oro-Medontes only decreased by
7.6%. Considering it cost $600,000 to build the sate lite office and it is costing approximately $33,000Iyear to run the
office our actual savings are minimal.
9. How many patrol cars and officers were based at the sate lite office when it opened in 2002
10. How many are based there now
11. Considering the cost of living is currently running at about 2.1 % and my OMERS pension for 2005 increased 1.79%
how does the O.P.P. justify and expected 8% increase in our policing costs for 2005.
12. How can we reduce our policing costs
13. How would we benefit by entering into a contract
14. Considering that the City of Orillia has 42 'assigned' officers, have a guarenteed 60,000 plus hours of patrol and deal
with over 15000 calis per year at a cost of less than $4 million how does the O.P.P. justify our costs of over $1.6 million
based on the hours of patrol we receive and the number of calis for service. I fully realise Orillia has a contract but our
actual costs per cali are approximately 5 times higher.
I will have more questions but this is a start.
Ralph Hough
Councillor,
Ward 2
,
. .
.
1. Ca]]s for services in Severn, Rarnara, City of Orillia.
2. Number of assigned officers Severn, Ramara, City of OriJ1ia.
Ruth Fountain
Councillor
Ward 5
,
. "0>
~
'E~ - \
10- ' .j. ....^
(O'Y
."e.-'-' ",,' ,,,".,Co_,.
..~
~..~~'~'v-
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
REPORT
Dept. Report No. To: COMMITTEE OF THE Prepared By:
WHOLE
PW2005.03 Jerry Ball
Subject: Department:
Council
2005 Grader Lease Public Works
C.ofW. Date:
April 12, 2005
Motion # R.M. File #:
L 14-14601
Date: RolI#:
II BACKGROUND: ~
In July of 2000, the Township of Oro-Medonte entered into a Lease Agreement with Toromont
Caterpillar to lease two (2) 140H motor graders. This five year Lease Agreement will terminate in
July, 2005 and the two (2) 140H motor graders will be returned to Toromon!.
Sealed quotations to lease two new graders, complete with wing and snow harness, were received
from the following companies and opened at the Administration Office on April 1 , 2005 at 1 :00 p.m.:
. Champion Road Machinery Sales
. Ontrac Equipment Services Inc.
. Toromont Caterpillar
Mayor Neil Craig, Recording Secretary Janette Teeter, Public Works Superintendent Jerry Ball, and
representatives from Ontrac Equipment Services Inc. and Champion Road Machinery Sales were
present during the opening.
Attached for Council's perusal is a summary comparing the quotations, indicating total purchase price
and a three and five year lease, with the option to purchase after five years. All prices quoted below
are before taxes.
Champion Road Volvo $214,600.00 $2,084.71 N/A 8-12 N/A
Machinery Sales G 720-8 weeks
after order
Volvo $221,900.00 $2,154.55 N/A N/A
G 730-8
Ontrac Equipment John Deere $212,772.00 $3,378.00 $3,477.00 60 days $77,100.00
Services Inc. 7700 after order
Toromont Caterpillar $250,454.00 $3,093.19 $3,808.91 September $122,782.50
Cater illar 160 H 30,2005
Note: John Deere revised to remove the 60 month maintenance contract, which was included
in first lease quotation.
II ANALYSIS: I
The quotations and financial options were reviewed with the Treasurer. Discussions were held with
the Foremen of both yards, as well as grader operators, to compare operating functions and
characteristics. Upon comparing the operating statistics provided for each machine, it was concluded
that the 160 H Caterpillar grader has a heavier operating weight, better engine torque, and a
substantial positive difference on blade pull versus the competition.
In the 2000 Lease Agreement with Toromont, each grader was estimated to operate 1,000 hours per
year. If the total hours of operation, per machine, exceeded 5,000 within the five year lease, there
would be a penalty charge of $32.04/hour. One of the existing graders will have an estimated 1,200
hours of overtime usage, which will be an additional cost to the municipality of $38,448.00. Toromont
Caterpillar provided a letter within their sealed quotation outlining this overtime penalty. It is also
stated in this letter that if the Township of Oro- Medonte decides to release two new Caterpillar
graders, Caterpillar Finance will discharge the Township of any overtime hour penalties that have
been incurred. As such, the effective monthly rental cost of the Caterpillar 160 H is $2,452.39.
Upon reviewing all machine statistics and considering the penalty for overtime hours, it is
recommended that two new 160 H Caterpillar graders, complete with snow wing and harness, be
leased from Toromont Caterpillar at the quoted price of $3,093.19, plus taxes, for five years. This
quoted price is based on 1,500 hours of operation, per year, per machine, with a Residual Value of
$122,782.50.
II RECOMMENDATION(S): IJ
1. THAT Report No. PW2005-03 be received and adopted.
2. THAT the Public Works Superintendent be authorized to lease two new 160 H Caterpillar
graders from Toromont Caterpillar at the quoted price of $3,093.19, plus taxes, for five years.
3. AND THAT the Public Works Superintendent advises Champion Road Machinery Sales and
Ontrac Equipment Services Inc. accordingly of Council's decision.
Respectfully submitted,
~
Jerry Ball ~.~PI /
Public Works Superintendent
I 1'}!t oS
.
r {~~!~~1~
'~'\/--~-"--''''''f '_
~/ '-0 "
'I ~ 'i\
g i ,- 4;1~ -
-:r;p .... ,. 1.'{{fJ
" ,"
'f--,':-'-'-~~"'" ;
~. ,-,~". '-=~.''''''.'--" d?
.~~.
'. We <;;;;;;;;;'''''' .
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
REPORT
Dept. Report No. To: COMMITTEE OF THE Prepared By:
WHOLE
EES2005-18 Keith Mathieson
Subject: Department:
Council
Timothy Pierce and Shelley Engineering and
Motz - Site Plan Agreement - Environmental Services
C.ofW. Lot 16, Plan 1464 (3 Mazepa Date:
Place - Ukrainian Village) - April 5, 2005
Motion # Being all of PIN #58561-0062 R.M. File #:
(Lt) - Roll #4346-010-011- D11-14544
Date: 15600-0000 RolI#:
010-011-15600
II BACKGROUND: ~
Mr. and Mrs. Pierce are proposing to construct a 24' x 36' addition to their existing home located at 3
Mazepa Place. As Mazepa Place is an unassumed road, Mr. and Mrs. Pierce must enter into a Site
Plan Agreement and remove the Holding Symbol, prior to the issuance of a Building Permit.
II ANALYSIS: II
Mr. and Mrs. Pierce's Site Plan was reviewed by the Site Plan Committee on April 1 , 2005.
The Committee and Township staff have no concerns with the proposed addition.
II RECOMMENDATION(S): I)
1. THAT Report No. EES2005-18 be received and adopted.
2. THAT the Township of Oro-Medonte enters into a Site Plan Agreement with Timothy Pierce and
She~otz to construct a 24' x 36' addition to their existing home located at 3 Mazepa Place
(Ukr inian Village).
3. THAT the Clerk prepares a By-law for Council's consideration.
4. A~D THAT Mr. and Mrs. Pierce be notified of Council's decision.
! f \
ResP~bmitted,
Keith Mathieson
Director of Engineering and Environmental SeNices
APPENDIX "A"
~
SITE PLAN AGREEMENT
. between.
TIMOTHY PIERCE
. and.
SHELLEY MOTZ
(AS JOINT TENANTS)
. and.
THE CORPORATION OF THE
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
DESCRIPTION OF LANDS
Lot 16, Plan 1464
Being all of PIN #58561-0062 (LI)
Roll #4346-010-011-15600-0000
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
COUNTY OF SIMCOE
April, 2005
By-Law No. 2005-
~ -
THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
SITE PLAN AGREEMENT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section 1 Covenants by the Owner
Section 2 Covenants by the Township
Section 3 Development Restrictions
Section 4 Development Changes
Section 5 Security
Section 6 Compliance
Section 7 Co-operation
Section 8 Binding Effect
Section 9 Severability of Clauses
Section 10 Save Harmless
SCHEDULES
Schedule "A" Legal Description of Lands
Schedule "B" Site Plan
Schedule "C" Deeds and Easements to be Conveyed
Schedule "D" Itemized Estimate of Cost of Construction
2
SITE PLAN CONTROL AGREEMENT
This Agreement made, in quadruplicate. this day of 2005, in
accordance with Section 41 of the Planninq Act.
BETWEEN: TIMOTHY PIERCE AND SHELLEY MOTZ
(AS JOINT TENANTS)
Hereinafter called the "Owner"
PARTY OF THE FIRST PART
-and-
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
Hereinafter called the "Township"
PARTY OF THE SECOND PART
WHEREAS the Owner has applied to the Township of Oro-Medonte to permit a 24' x 36'
addition to their residence on lands described in Schedule "A". attached hereto;
AND WHEREAS the Township has enacted a By-law to provide for the designation of the
lands as a "Site Plan Control Area";
AND WHEREAS the Owner intends to develop the lands in accordance with the Site Plan
attached hereto as Schedule "B";
NOW THEREFORE This Agreement Witnesseth THAT in consideration of the mutual
covenants hereinafter contained, the parties hereto hereby covenant and agree as
follows:
3
1. COVENANTS BY THE OWNER
The Owner covenants and agrees as follows:
a) The Owner owns the subject lands described in Schedule "A". attached hereto,
and has provided the Township with a Registered Deed containing the legal
description of the subject lands.
b) This Agreement may be registered against title to these subject lands and shall
take priority over any subsequent registrations against the title to the subject lands.
c) No work shall be performed on the lands. nor any use made of the subject lands
with respect to the proposed development. except in conformity with all the
provisions of this Agreement.
d) The Owner shall. prior to the execution of this Agreement, obtain all necessary
permits and approvals from the Township and from all Ministries and Agencies,
including, but not limited to, the County of Simcoe.
e) The Owner shall, prior to the execution of this Agreement, pay all municipal taxes
and charges related to obtaining the approval of these lands for the intended use.
f) The Owner shall pay a refundable deposit for such reasonable costs as may be
involved to the Township in having its solicitor. engineer, planner and staff, perform
any work in connection with this Agreement. including the preparation, drafting.
execution, and registration of this Agreement. The Owner acknowledges and
agrees that the Owner shall be responsible for the cost of performance of all the
Owner's obligations hereunder. unless the context otherwise requires. Every
provision of this Agreement, by which the Owner is obligated in any way, shall be
deemed to include the words "at the expense of the Owner", unless specifically
stated otherwise. The refundable deposit for expenses and actual cost shall be
$N/A. The Owner shall replenish the refundable deposit, to its full amount, when
the expenses and actual costs are submitted by the Township.
g) The Owner shall have delivered to the Township, all Transfers/Deeds, Discharges
and Easements. or other documents required by Schedule "C", as well as
certification from the Owner's solicitor that the Transfer/Deeds and Easements
shall provide the Township with good title. free and clear from all encumbrances.
h) The Owner acknowledges that the lot does not front on an improved public road.
that the Township does not or is not required to maintain or snowplow the said
road. that the Township will not take over or assume the private road as a
Township public road or street unless it has been built according to the Township
standards, then in force, and that the Township is not liable for any injuries, losses
or damages as a consequence of the Township issuing a Building Permit.
2. COVENANTS BY THE TOWNSHIP
The Township covenants and agrees as follows:
a) That the Township has enacted a By-law to permit a 24' x 36' addition to their
residence described on the Site Plan.
b) That the Township agrees that subject to compliance by the Owner with all
relevant Municipal By-laws and Provincial Statutes and Regulations, the Owner
may proceed to develop the subject lands. as indicated on the Site Plan attached
hereto as Schedule "B", subject to the development restrictions contained herein.
4
3. DEVELOPMENT RESTRICTIONS
The Parties hereto acknowledge and agree that any use of the subject lands by the
Owner shall be on and subject to the following terms and conditions:
a) Site Plan
The use and development of the subject lands shall be in accordance with and as
set out on the Site Plan, attached hereto as Schedule "B".
b) Liohtino
All lighting systems installed outside, such as floodlights, shall be directed away
from any adjacent residential use and/or roadway, not to cause interference in any
way.
c) Parkino Areas and Driveways
All parking areas and driveways shall be constructed in conformity with Sections
5.19 and 5.20 of By-law No. 97-95, as amended. and the Ontario Building Code
Regulation #419/86, and such parking areas. loading. and access areas shall be
kept free and clear of snow and ice and kept adequately drained. All entrances
shall be constructed, as in Schedule "B" attached. The Owner agrees to obtain
all necessary approvals from the Ministry of Transportation. County of Simcoe and
Township of Oro-Medonte.
d) Outside Storaoe
No outside storage shall be permitted between any buildings on the premises and
any street. Any other outside storage shall be contained in the fenced compound,
as identified on Schedule "B".
e) LandscapinQ
The Owner shall complete all landscaping and landscaped areas shown on the
Site Plan, attached as Schedule "B", as soon as weather permits, and all grading
and sodding required. according to any Engineering drawings submitted. shall be
done on all lawn areas.
f) Erosion and Siltation Control
The Owner must take all necessary precautions to prevent erosion and
sedimentation of ditches and culverts, slopes. etc.. within the Site Plan, and
downstream prior to and during construction. The Owner agrees to maintain all
erosion and siltation control devices in good repair until vegetative cover has been
successfully established.
4. DEVELOPMENT CHANGES
The parties acknowledge and agree that there shall be no changes to this Agreement or
the Schedules attached hereto. unless and until such changes have been approved by all
parties. It is the intention of the parties that material amendments to this Agreement be
properly recorded. Such amendments may take the form of a registered Amending
Agreement, an unregistered Agreement. exchange of correspondence, Memorandum of
Confirmation, or natations on Engineering drawings. The nature of such record of
amendment shall depend on circumstances.
5
5. SECURITY
Prior to signing the Agreement, the Owner will deposit. with the Treasurer of the
Township. to cover the faithful performance of the obligations of the Owner arising under
this Agreement, including but not limited to the construction of the works and services
identified in Schedule "D" to this Agreement (the "said Work"). the following securities:
a) Cash in the amount of one hundred percent (100%) of the estimated cost of the
said work. as approved by the Township Engineer and Township Council. or:
b) An irrevocable Letter of Credit from a chartered bank, issued in accordance with
the requirements of Schedule "E". with an automatic renewal clause in the amount
of one hundred percent (100%) of the estimated costs of the said works, and as
approved by the Township Engineer. The Letter of Credit shall be for a minimum
guaranteed period of one (1) year. or such time as the Township decides, and
shall be renewed automatically. as necessary. thirty (30) days prior to expiration.
c) The Township reserves the right to accept or reject any of these alternative
methods of providing securities. Prior to depositing the securities, the Owner's
Engineer shall submit an estimate of the cost of the works to the Township
Engineer for approval. When the cost estimate has been approved, it will be set
out in Schedule "D" of this Agreement and will become the basis for the limits of
the securities.
d) Any Letter of Credit or security filed with the Township is based upon the estimated
cost of completing the various matters prescribed by this Agreement. However, all
Letters of Credit and security received by the Township may be used as security
for any item or any other matter which. under the terms of this Agreement. is the
responsibility of the Owner, including without limiting the generality of the
foregoing. payment of engineering. legal, planning or other costs incurred by the
Township. which are the responsibility of the Owner. under the terms of this
Agreement.
e) Upon written notification by the Owner's agent, certifying that all required works
for which the Letter of Credit was submitted have been completed in accordance
with the plans submitted and upon confirmation by the Township or its agent that
the Owner's obligations under this Agreement have been completed. the
Township will return said Letter of Credit.
f) If in the event of default of the Owner under any of the provisions of this
Agreement, it becomes necessary for the Township to realize on its security or
deposits. then the Township shall give, by registered mail. twenty-one (21) day's
notice, its intent to draw down on the security or deposit.
6. COMPLIANCE
Any action taken by the Township or on its behalf, pursuant to this Agreement. shall be in
addition to and without prejudice to any security or other guarantee given on behalf of the
Owner for the performance of its covenants and agreements herein, and upon default on
the part of the Owner hereunder. the Township shall. in addition to any other remedy
available to it, be at liberty to utilize the provisions of Section 325 of the Municipal Act,
R.S.O. 1980. Chapter 302. as amended.
7. CO-OPERATION
The Owner consents to the registration of this Agreement by the Township. upon the title
of the subject lands. at the expense of the Owner and agrees to execute such further and
other documents. consents or applications, as required, for the purpose of securing
registration and giving effect to the provisions of this Agreement.
6
8. BINDING EFFECT
This Agreement. and everything contained herein, shall be binding upon the successors
and assigns of the parties hereto, and upon the lands described in Schedule "A", attached
hereto. such Schedule being a legal description of the lands. and it is further agreed that
this Agreement shall be prepared. approved and registered on title.
9. SEVERABILITY OF CLAUSES
Should any section. subsection. clause, paragraph. or provision of this Agreement be
declared by a Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid. the same shall not affect the
validity of the Agreement as a whole or any part thereof. other than the provision so
declared to be invalid.
10. SAVE HARMLESS
The Owner. on behalf of itself. its successors and assigns. agrees to indemnify and save
harmless, the Township from and against any and all claims. suits, actions and demands
whatsoever. which may arise either directly or indirectly by reason of any work or service
performed by the Township. its servants or sub-contractors in order to complete the work
or services required to be completed under this Agreement, provided the subject matter
of such action, suits, claims or demands was not caused intentionally or through gross
negligence on the part of the Township, its servants or agents or sub-contractors.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereunto have affixed their respective seals
under the hands of their proper officers duly authorized in that behalf.
SIGNED, SEALED AND DELIVERED ,G:Z2~
) Owner: Timothy Pierce
)
)
~ \~ \l---
) Ow : Sh\;,lIey Motz
)
) (AS JOINT TENANTS)
)
)
) The Corporation of the
) Township of Oro-Medonte
)
) per:
)
)
)
) J. Neil Craig, Mayor
)
)
)
) Marilyn Pennycook, Clerk
)
7
SCHEDULE "A"
NOTE: It is understood and agreed that this Schedule forms part of the Site Plan
Agreement between the Township of Oro-Medonte, Timothy Pierce and
Shelley Motz.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF LANDS
Lot 16. Plan 1464. being all of PIN #58561-0062 (Lt). Township of Oro-Medonte,
County of Simcoe, Roll #4346-010-011-15600-0000.
8
SCHEDULE "B"
NOTE: It is understood and agreed that this Schedule forms part of the Site Plan
Agreement between the Township of Oro-Medonte. Timothy Pierce and
Shelley Motz.
SITE PLAN
Site Plan is not in a registerable form and is available from the Township of Oro-Medonte.
A-1 Site Plan - #3 Mazepa Place dated May 14. 2004.
9
SCHEDULE "C" \
NOTE: It is understood and agreed that this Schedule forms part of the Site Plan
Agreement between the Township of Oro-Medonte, Timothy Pierce and
Shelley Motz.
DEEDS AND EASEMENTS TO BE CONVEYED
All title documents shall be properly drawn and executed by the parties, with the
appropriate Lot or Block Number inserted in the description of the document. and the
registered Plan Number shall be left blank, to be inserted by the solicitors for the parties
after the Plan is registered and a Plan Number assigned.
The consideration for all conveyances shall be the sum of Two Dollars ($2.00) and the
cost of preparation, execution and registration thereof, shall be borne by the Owner.
All documents to be registered shall be prior approved by the solicitor for the Township.
The following land and easement shall be conveyed:
1.0 LANDS TO BE CONVEYED TO THE TOWNSHIP
N/A
2.0 DRAINAGE EASEMENTS TO BE CONVEYED TO THE TOWNSHIP
N/A
10
SCHEDULE "D" ""'"
NOTE: It is understood and agreed that this Schedule forms part of the Site Plan
Agreement between the Township of Oro-Medonte. Timothy Pierce and
Shelley Motz.
ITEMIZED ESTIMATE OF COST OF CONSTRUCTION
1. ITEMIZE CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE AMOUNT
N/A
2. LETTERS OF CREDIT AMOUNT
Letter of Credit to be provided by the Owner N/A
to ensure completion of all works required
under the terms of this Agreement. as noted
in Section 5 herein.
11
~
~,~,.,--_._---~~ :tt
I<~~-~~O\
gE~
I- - ", ~ .4 1"'1
v." 1!,;j
~~i;/
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
REPORT
Dept. Report No. To: Prepared By:
PD 2005-025 Committee of the Whole Nick McDonald, RPP
Subject: Department:
Council Planning
Craighurst Secondary Plan
C.ofW. Date:
April 6, 2005
Motion # A.M. File #:
D08 013857
Date: RolI#:
II BACKGROUND: II
The purpose of this report is to provide Council with an update on the status of the Craighurst
Secondary Plan. The Secondary Plan process was initiated in late 1999 and has experienced a
number of delays for a variety of reasons. However, a comprehensive draft servicing report has now
been prepared by Trow Engineering, and we are now at a point where additional information is
available for consideration as part of the Secondary Plan process, This report will summarize the
servicing report prepared by Trow Engineering and make recommendations on next steps.
The Craighurst settlement area is centred on the intersection of County Road 93 and County Road
22. The total area of the settlement is approximately 160 hectares. Section 61.2.4 of the approved
Official Plan states that "it shall be a policy of this Plan that a Secondary Plan be prepared for
Craighurst prior to the development of any new residential plans of subdivision. Such a Secondary
Plan shall deal with such issues as parkland, road access and servicing on a comprehensive basis".
Section D4.3.5 of the approved Official Plan identifies the matters that are to be dealt with by the
Secondary Plan. These include:
. The mix, density and phasing of proposed land uses;
. The appropriate form of servicing;
. The location, scale and type of commercial uses;
. The impacts of development on community facilities such as schools;
. The compatibility of proposed uses with adjacent land uses outside of the settlement;
. Parkland;
. Provision of an appropriate road network; and
. The impact of development on the Highway 400/Horseshoe Valley Road interchange.
~,
,
~
On the basis of these approved policies, a work program for the Secondary Plan was prepared in late
1999. The work program, which was adopted by Council, established a 4 stage process. Stage 1
involved a review of all background materials, Stage 2 involved the preparation of alternative land use
concepts, Stage 3 involved the preparation of a preferred land use concept, and the last stage
entailed the actual preparation of the Secondary Plan. We are now in Stage 3.
Consultants were retained in early 2000, and a number of public meetings and open houses were
held in 2000 and 2001 to solicit the views of the public. However, Council decided to delay the
Secondary Plan process in late 2000 as a result of the municipal elections, and then later in 2001
when the Oro Moraine Land Use Plan was initiated. The Oro Moraine Land Use Plan and
implementing Official Plan Amendment #16 was adopted by Council in August 2003 and approved
with modifications by the County of Simcoe in late 2004. The Oro Moraine Official Plan Amendment
is now under appeal and it is expected that a hearing on OPA 16 will be held later in 2005.
Before the Oro Moraine process was initiated, Meridian prepared a report in November 2001 which
reviewed development options for Craighurst. The report indicated that "given the lack of municipal
services, the establishment of development options in Craighurst is very much dependent on the type
and cost of municipal servicing". The report also indicated that "the type of servicing selected must
have regard to the servicing hierarchy that is set out in both the Provincial Policy Statement and the
County of Simcoe Official Plan". Both of these documents indicate that the preferred means of
servicing settlement areas is by full municipal water and sewage services. The Meridian report
further indicated that "from a planning perspective, it is much more preferable to encourage the
development of compact communities on full municipal services'.
On the basis of the above, two design options were prepared for consideration. The first option
described how Craighurst could be developed on municipal water and private septic systems. A
typical lot in this scenario would have a frontage of 30 metres and a depth of 70 metres. On the basis
of the development of this size of lot, a total of 240 lots could be developed within the undeveloped
portions of the community. The second development scenario assumed a development would occur
on full municipal services. In this scenario, lots would have a frontage of 12 to 18 metres. About 700
lots could be developed within the community if this option was selected.
On the basis of a detailed review of the options, it was our recommendation in the November 2001
report that the Craighurst community be developed on the basis of full municipal services.
The Oro Moraine land use planning process was then initiated. In an October 2002 report prepared
by Meridian, it was recommended that all new residential and commercial development on the Ora
Moraine be directed to existing development areas. In addition, it was also recommended that new
residential development on the Oro Moraine be serviced by municipal or communal water and sewer
services.
These recommendations, amongst others, were then translated into OPA 16. OPA 16 included a
new policy on Craighurst that was intended to build upon the existing approved policies. The new
policy is below:
A4.2.4 - Craighurst
It is expected that there will be pressure for growth in Craighurst over the planning period
since it is:
. Centred on the intersection of 2 major highways;
. Located adjacent to Highway 400;
. Within easy access to employment and shopping in Barrie; and,
. Located at the gateway to a major recreational area centred on Horseshoe
Valley Resort.
- 2 -
On the basis of the above, a Secondary Plan shall be prepared for Craighurst prior to
the development of any new residential plans of subdivision. Such a Secondary Plan
shall deal with such issues as parkland, road access and servicing on a
comprehensive basis. Given the location of Craighurst on the Oro Moraine, the
preferred means of servicing in Craighurst is on the basis of full municipal services".
As noted previously, OPA 16 is under appeal. However, none of the appellants have specifically
identified this new section on Craighurst as being an issue.
On the basis of the above adopted policy, Trow Engineering was directed in 2004 to prepare a
servicing report for Craighurst that was based on the principle that full municipal services were the
preferred means of servicing the settlement area.
The Trow Report
The Trow report dated March 2005 is a "draft" final report. The report builds upon a background
report prepared by Trow in August 2000.
The March 2005 report reviews the feasibility of developing up to 700 new homes, a new elementary
school, and approximately 9 hectares of commercial/institutional development in the community of
Craighurst. The report reviews the feasibility of supplying Craighurst with municipal sewage and
water services, the ability of the transportation network to accommodate development, and the
feasibility of treating stormwater in accordance with today's standards. A brief summary of the
findings in the report is below.
Sanitary Sewage Collection and Disposal
Section 4 of the March 2005 report reviews a variety of options with respect to the provision of
sanitary sewage collection and disposal services. Given the soil and overburden characteristics in
the area, a system that is based on subsurface sewage disposal is preferred. However, another
option is to discharge effluent into a tributary of Matheson Creek or Craig's Swamp. It is noted in the
report that Craig's Swamp "has the ability to treat wastewater effluent to a high level, and may benefit
from the additional flow and nutrients produced by a municipal sewage treatment facility".
It is noted in the report that the treatment option will be dependent on whether the effluent will be
discharged to a location that is hydraulically not isolated or isolated from sources of groundwater
supply. If it is not isolated, the main constraint becomes the nitrate concentration in the effluent. In
order for the effluent to have an appropriate nitrate concentration, a rotary biological contactor, or a
sequential batch reactor, or an aerobic plant with denitrification would be required. If the land within
the Secondary Plan area were used in the dilution calculations, then such a plant could support up to
780 dwelling units, or 2,340 people within the Secondary Plan area.
If the effluent discharge location is hydraulically isolated from groundwater sources, then there is no
issue with respect to nitrate. On the basis of information collected to date, the wetlands located west
and north of the study area function as a hydraulic boundary for groundwater flow, which means that
there is an upward hydraulic gradient in the direction of groundwater flow adjacent to the wetlands.
This means that if effluent is discharged in this location, the discharge of sewage would be via the
subsurface and will be level to the adjacent wetlands and eventually to Matheson Creek. In this case,
the main constraint will be the amount of phosphorous that can be accommodated in the
wetland/Matheson Creek. It is estimated that if a biological membrane plant was constructed with
98% removal of phosphorous, a total of 864 dwelling units could be serviced within the Craighurst
settlement.
- 3 -
In terms of treatment plant location, it is recommended that the most appropriate location is to the
west of the CP rail line, since the location is downstream of the development area. Locating a plant in
this area ensures that all possible options with respect to sewage disposal are available.
It should be noted that all options are required to be explored as part of the environmental
assessment process, which is a process that will need to be followed prior to any development
occurring within the Secondary Plan area. However, the report does indicate very clearly that it is
technically possible to develop between 700 and 860 new dwelling units within the Secondary Plan
area, based on current knowledge.
Water Supply
Section 2 of the Trow report deals with water supply, storage and distribution. The report notes that
there are currently three wells servicing the Craighurst Estates subdivision. The water system is
designed for about 166 people. It is also noted that the Snider well is in existence, however, many
residents and businesses have been disconnected from the well in recent years.
As per the previous Trow report, it is noted that the lower aquifer is capable of supplying a
considerable amount of water for new development in the area. It is estimated that the lower aquifer
can supply water to approximately 2,740 people (910 households).
Two new wells would be needed in the community. There may be a need for storage associated with
each well. However, 1 elevated storage facility is also feasible.
In terms of well location, wells can be located anywhere within the Secondary Plan area. However,
the cost of constructing a well at the lowest surface elevation above the aquifer is the least expensive.
Over time, the plan would be to connect the new wells with the existing wells at Craighurst Estates.
The cost of constructing a new municipal water system in Craighurst ranges from between $1.5
million to $2.2 million, depending on the number of wells and the type of underground storage.
Elevated storage is the least expensive option.
Stormwater Management
Section 5 of the Trow report deals with stormwater management. Given the rolling topography of the
area, there are 6 drainage basins within the Secondary Plan area. This means, at least in principle,
that there will be a need for a storm water management pond in each of the basins. However, it is
possible for 1 pond to be constructed for 2 of the basins, provided a culvert is upgraded. It is
estimated that the cost of the new ponds will be approximately $1.5 million.
Transportation
Section 6 of the Trow report deals with transportation. It is noted that County Road 22 is the busier of
the 2 County Roads in the settlement area. In 2002, traffic volumes on County Road 22 were about
5,600 vehicles per day, and 2,400 vehicles per day on County Road 93 (this is the average daily
traffic averaged over a year). Traffic, particularly on County Road 22, has been increasing rapidly in
recent years, and in 1995, the AADT on County Road 22 at 93 was 3,350. The County of Simcoe
estimates that the amount of truck traffic on County Road 22 is about 5% of the total volume. The
Trow report notes that the traffic analysis undertaken by the County was not taken during the ski
season at Horseshoe Resort. This means that the actual numbers may be significantly higher,
particularly in the winter.
Based on growth outside of the Secondary Plan area, it is estimated that traffic, particularly on
County Road 22, will increase by about 3.8% per year. Given that it is conservatively estimated that
- 4 -
Ci\,
about 75 homes per year will be developed in the Craighurst settlement, the rate of traffic growth
attributed to growth in Craighurst is marginal when compared to the rate of growth in traffic expected
as a result of other development in the area.
Both County Roads 22 and 93 are considered to be arterial roads, and are designed to accommodate
20,000 AADT each. Based on an analysis of the increase in background traffic and the increase
resulting from traffic resulting in the Craighurst settlement, an additional 2 lanes will be required on
County Road 22 through the Secondary Plan area.
With respect to the rail line, it is noted in the report that the rail line travelling through Craighurst is the
main line between Toronto and Western Canada. As many as 16 trains per day with train lengths
anywhere between 50 and 180 cars, pass through the community on any given weekday. It is
estimated that delays caused by the passing of trains over County Roads 93 and 22 average about 5
minutes. However, these delays are compounded when trains pass each other and 1 train is required
to wait for the train to pass. Although CP does not provide any estimates of future traffic on this rail
line, it is felt that the amount, frequency and length of trains will undoubtedly increase in the future.
On the basis of the above, it is recommended that additional storage be constructed on County Road
22 both east and west of the existing rail line. This storage, in the form of additional lanes, will ensure
that traffic does not back up the off-ramp from Highway 400 onto the highway itself. No additional
lanes are required on County Road 93.
With respect to the cost of improvements, particularly to County Road 22, it is estimated that only
23% of the additional traffic on County Road 22 will be from development within the Secondary Plan
area. As a result, it is suggested that new development only be responsible for 23% of the cost. It is
noted that storage lanes would eventually be required even if no development occurred in Craighurst.
Overall Cost
Given the desire to ensure that development within Craighurst is cost-effective, a major focus of the
work was the determination of how much it would cost to develop the municipal services required to
service the new development. Based on the equivalent of 931 dwelling units (this takes into account
the proposed school and the new commercial/Institutional uses), it is estimated that the cost of the
water supply and storage, water distribution network, sewage treatment system, the sewage
collection system, the storm water management facilities, other drainage works, internal roads,
streetlights and utilities, and the widening of County Road 22 will cost approximately $19,740 per unit.
I ANALYSIS: II
The Trow report has indicated very clearly that developing Craighurst on the basis of full municipal
services is both feasible and cost-effective. It is also clear that the policy in the approved Oro
Moraine Official Plan Amendment 16 that directs growth on the Oro Moraine to fully serviced
settlement areas can be implemented. By directing development to a fully serviced settlement area
on the Moraine, less land is required for development and more land can be left in its rural or natural
state on the remainder of the Oro Moraine.
It should be noted as well that there is an interest in developing lands within the Craighurst
community. At the present time, the Township is in receipt of an application by the Sinton's to
develop a number of lots in the northeast quadrant of the community. This application has been held
in abeyance for about 2 years until the Secondary Plan process is completed. It is also recognized
that existing residents in the community are somewhat resistant to change and the impacts that
change may have on their quality of life. It is my opinion that given the scale and rate of change (over
a 20 year period), many of these concerns can be mitigated through appropriate/proper design and
phasing.
- 5 -
Although a considerable amount of progress has been made with respect to servicing the Craighurst
community, another potential delay in the process looms. In mid 2004, the Province of Ontario
announced that it would be initiating the preparation of an Intergovernmental Action Plan for South
Simcoe County. To carry out this work, a 5 phase work program is proposed. Given concerns with
respect to the ability of Lake Simcoe and the Nottawasaga River to accommodate additional effluent,
the Province has committed funds to study the assimilative capacity of both Lake Simcoe and the
Nottawasaga River. The intent of these studies is to identify how much effluent both receiving bodies
can sustain, which in turn will generate information on how much additional development can be
accommodated in these areas.
The main consideration in the study will be phosphorous, which contributes to the deterioration of
water quality and which over time affects plant and animal life. At the present time, it is estimated
that 7% of all phosphorous entering Lake Simcoe and the Nottawasaga River comes from sewage
treatment plants. The remainder comes from runoff from both urban and rural or agricultural lands.
If these two waterbodies cannot assimilate additional effluent, then growth prospects for Simcoe
County are limited. It would also mean that other areas around the Greater Toronto Area would then
have to be targeted for additional growth. Alternatively, the results of the various studies may lead to
the use of improved technology at sewage treatment plants to remove additional phosphorous from
their effluent or other servicing options. It may also lead to new programs that prevent phosphorous
from non-point sources from reaching these waterbodies.
Following the completion of these studies, it is anticipated that the Province will then review a number
of options with respect to growth and servicing in Simcoe County. These options may include looking
at Barrie as the only location for growth, dividing growth between other municipalities, and perhaps
potentially dispersing growth to a number of candidate settlements within the County.
The results of the Assimilative Capacity Study will only become known in late 2005/early 2006. In the
interim, the Ministry of Environment will not comment or provide advice on the development and/or
expansion of sewage treatment plans within Simcoe County. On this basis, proceeding to Phase 4 of
the work program, which involves the preparation of the actual Secondary Plan, would be premature.
However, it should be noted that the lands that are the subject of the Secondary Plan are currently
designed for development in the Official Plan, and that the process of reviewing the Secondary Plan
area was initiated long before these recent studies were announced by the Province. As a result, if it
is determined that the receiving bodies can accommodate additional effluent, it is my opinion that the
Secondary Plan process can then be completed.
Notwithstanding the above, it is recognized that residents of Craighurst have expressed an interest in
knowing how the Secondary Plan process is proceeding. On this basis, it is recommended that a
public information meeting be held to provide the residents of Craighurst with an update on the
process that has been followed to date, the results of the Trow study, and to indicate that the study
will not be completed until the Province completes the Assimilative Capacity Studies of the
Nottawasaga River watershed which is anticipated in late 2005.
- 6 -
II RECOMMENDATION(S): ~
It is recommended to Council that:
. Report PD 2005-025 be received for information purposes;
. The Trow report dated March 2005 on Craighurst be received for information purposes;
. A public information meeting be scheduled to provide residents of Craighurst with an update on
the Secondary Plan process; and,
. Planning Report PD 2005-025 and the Trow report be circulated to the appropriate agencies for
comment.
Respectfully submitted,
{ /
f
./ 1/ ,/
2 ..-) fL-'; tf.p.Q..(
Nick McDonald, MCIP, RPPV
Partner
/~ /) (/o~
C.A.O. Comments: Date: f)
l i I~ .. u
T - . I
C.A.O. Dept. Head
- 7 -
I
I *Trow
I
I
I
I
I DRAFT
I Craighurst Secondary Plan
Master Servicing Report
I
I
I Prepared for:
Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte
I
I
I
I TROW ASSOCIATES INC.
I
I 561 Bryne Drive, Unit D Project No: BAIF0013761A
I Barrie, Ontario L4N 9Y3 March 4, 2005
Tel: (705) 734-6222
Fax: (705) 734-6224
I
I *Trow
DRAFT
I
Cralghurst Secondary Plan - Master Servicing Report BAlF0013761 A
I Table of Contents
I 1.0 Executive Summary 1
I 2.0 Introduction 3
2.1 Background """"" "",.."""..""...""""""..",..""", ",.".,.".,..,.",.. "..,.,." ,.."...".,...,.",3
I 2,1.1 W ork Program.,.,."..".,.,.,..,.,.,..".."",...,..,..,...,..'.." ".,.,., "....",. ,.,.,..."....".",3
2,1.2 Preferred Growth Option "" ".,..,..",....".,. ...,..'.',..'",.,.", "....",. ,..",..""..".".4
2,1.3 Constraints to Development.,...,. .."....'...', ..'""."",..,...,.. "... '..', ,.."............". 7
I 3.0 Water Supply, Storage and Distribution 10
3,1 Existing Water Supply '.....'..,....,..,....,........,......."....',..,......,......,........,..,..,...........,10
I ,3,2 Future Water Supply ..,....................,........,..,..'........."..,..,............,....'..,....,..,.........11
3,3 Storage."..",.."".",.,.".,........",.",."""""..",...,...,..."",."."..."".",...,.".,..",..".""" ,13
I 3.3.1 General Requirements "" '" ".....".."".""".,.",."""""" .,., ,'.'. ,.", ,..,.....,.",..,.13
3.3.2 Local Underground Storage ....".....,....,.........,........,......,...."....,..,..,......,....14
3.3.3 Central Storage".".", ".""...,.,.', """",.",.,., """""",.,.,.... ".., "'" "..,.,,'.' "".,.15
I 3.4 Well Locations ..,..,..,..,............, ..,...., ..,..'......'......, ......,............,...... ......' ,.. .............,17
3,5 Water Supply Facilities .., ...", ,., '" ,.",.,..."...,,'...',., ".", "",.""."". ",.., ,..,. '.. ".",., .",.,20
I 3,6 Water Distribution Network ,............,..,........,....,..,............,..,......,....,..,..........,..,..,21
3,7 Costs", ".." "",.""."", ",.,.,.,." ,.,.,.", ,." ,.." ",...,,'.."...". ,.,,'.', "., '" ,." ".. ".., .", '" "."".,,22
I 4.0 Sanitary Sewage Collection and Disposal 24
4.1 General.,..",."""", "."."...,......,."., ,.,.,.".,..,.,...,..... ....' ,'. ".""""", "."" '" ".." ",.,."".,24
I 4,2 Wastewater Flows .,.".".,.,. .,'.,., ".", ,." ,..',.",'..",.,. ..",.,. '" ",.", "., "." ".,.. .,. ".", ,..",..25
4,3 Sewage Collection ".,.".,." "..... ".,."", ".",.",....'. '. .."...' .,..,."."", "."" ",. ".".",." ,. ".27
I 4.4 Disposal Options '" ".".,.,.".".... .",.,.", '" ".,.,.,. ""', ..,'..,. ....',.,., "., "."" "" '" '..",."" ",28
4.5 Sewage Disposal Limitations,.,.,.,' ..,.,." "",.""."., ,..".,..".".....,.. '" ".,.", ",.......""...29
4.6 Treatment Plant Location.,."".,.,.",.....,."",.""."",..".".".".,.,.,..",.",."""...,..,...,." 3 3
I 4.7 Costs,.,.,.",.."".."..,.,.".".,."..".,.,.",.,.,.,."....""."",.",."""".,.,.,.",.",.",..,..".."""", 34
I 5.0 Stormwater Management 35
5.1 Existing Conditions. ,....,..'....", ,., "."", ,....,..""."".,.' ,..", .,.".".,.,.,.. ".,.., ..., "'" '" "..",..35
5,1,1 Drainage Basins ....,....,.."...."............,..,......,........,..,...."...,....,....".......,........35
I 5.1,2 Storrnwater Management Facilities ..,......,..............,....,........"........,....,....,...37
5,1.3 Soils.",."".,.. ...,.......,.", ,.,."., ,."" .'.'..."".", "..',..,."", ".,.,..,..",. '" ..",.".",."".,,3 7
5.2 Guidelines ",..,..'. ".,.,.. ".,.".".,..".,...'" "."" "".",.,.,." ".",.,.,." "...."..,. .'..". "., "...",..38
I
March, 2005 I
I
I DRAFT *Trow
I Craighurst Secondary Plan - Master Servicing Report BAlF0013761 A
I 5.3 Best Management Practice,.." ,....,.".,..",.........,..,."..",."" """ ,........,............", ,....,.38
5.4 Pre ,Development...,.".....,."..,............"......,..."."., ""."" "'....,.,..,."..",,, ,.."" ,...".,..39
I 5.5 Post Development ,."."....,...,...,....."............"..,.." "..",.",."....,...,.."..."....,..,..,...,.,.40
5.6 Storrnwater Management Ponds ,............,.".",."..,.....,....,.....,." ,..,.."'....,,.. ,..,..".,..40
5,7 SWMF Design Criteria ,'.'........."..".".",..............,..",.""..,....,.,.,..,.....,...,...,." ,.,...,41
I 5,8 Erosion and Sediment Control During Construction .........,...................................42
5,9 Storrnwater Drainage Works Cost Estimates......................,..................................43
I 6.0 Transportation 44
6.1 Road Defmitions ,...,.", ",.,.,.,.,.", ".,.".,...".".....,.".,.",."", ",.,.,......,.."" '" ".. ,." ,.,..,.44
I 6.2 Existing Conditions, ".".,..."...,., "., ".".,'., '......".,.., ",."".",.,'...,.,....." "".,..,.."., '.", ,44
6.3 Existing Traffic '...".,.,'. ,.." ",.,.,.,.,.',...,...,...,.",." ".,..",.",.,'...., ,..,."" ""..."" ".,...".,46
I 6.3.1 Annual Average Daily Traffic ....,..............,............,..,..,.........,............,.....47
6.3.2 Peak Hour Traffic ..,..,............,....,..,....,.............................,....,.....,..........,..47
6.4 Future Conditions...., '" ".,...,..,., ,.,....,."..,.."...",."., ",.",."".,'..".....",."".,..,..,." ,..".49
I 6.4.1 Background Traffic ...,.., ,.,..,." '" ",."."",....,. ",."" '" ",.. ".. "...".,., "" ,.." ,.".,,49
6.4,2 Secondary Plan Traffic ....,........,..,..,................,........"....,......,...,....,......,...49
6.4.3 Trip Generation ,.,.""., '.'...,.,.".,.,.,.", '" '" ".,..",.",."."., "., "" ",'.., "'" '. .,..", .,50
I 6.4.4 Trip Distribution.",.,."".,...".".."."""".""..,.""""""""",.",.,.,.."",...""", .50
6.4.5 Traffic Volume..,.. ..,...., '......, ,..........,.., ............ ,....,..,......,..,..,.. ..,......, ,.., ....,51
I 6,5 Rail.,.,.".",." ,'.....,.", ,,'.', "."" ,." '.,.,.,.,.." "" '" '" ".,....,., "'" '" '" ,.,.,.,."".,..,."., '.'"." ",53
6,5.1 Introduction.,.",.,."."".,.,.,.,.,."."...,."."."".".",.....".,.,.",.",.""..,..,.".",.",.5 3
6,5,2 Passing Trains .".,.,.".,., ,.,.,.,..,.",.,. "."."." '" ",."..", .,., ,'.,."...,.,..,.',.,.."., ,...,53
I 6,5.3 Stopped Trains '... ".,.,.,., ,.,." ".,..,'."." ",."" ",.", .,'..,'...,.,. ,.",..",'.'..", ".,...".54
6,6 Road Requirements ." ",." ".",., "'.,.,.,.,, ,..."."." ",.,.".",..,..".".." ".". ".,..,.." ,.,.,.' .".,54
I 6,7 Design Criteria .,......,.".,." "".,.,.., "." ".".." ".", ".,."." ,,'. .,'..'.. ,.,.,.,."" ",,'..,., ,.,,'. ..",56
6.7,1 Arterial Roads ."" ,,'....,.,., ,..", ".."....', ,..."" ".", "".".".,.....",."...,'."., ,."..".,56
6.7.2 Collector Roads"".",.,.,...,.,..".,...,.,..".".,..",."".",.,.."....,."""",.,.."""""., 5 6
I 6,7.3 Local Roads ",.".,.,.....,.,., "..,..,..,......, "..,."" ,,'. .", ",....,.. "."..".,,'...,., ,.,...", ,57
6.7.4 Other ,." "...,.', ".".,.""..,.,..".,." "..,. ,'.',." ,..,.".", "'" ,'........, ""."", ...".""", ",57
6,8 Cost ..." ..,.".,.. ,...."..,.,.. .., ,."".,..,.. ,....,.., ",...." ".."" '..,.. ,.,. ",.".." ".",.,.."".".,..,.,.",.57
I 7.0 Conclusions 59
I References 62
Tables
I 1 Secondary Plan Land Use .,.".,.,'.".....,.,.,.,.,.".",.,.,..,..,.'.".".",.." '" ,.,." "..,'..,.." ,'.. ..".."".6
2 Secondary Plan Population ,..,....,..,...., ,............,...., ............,. ....... ......... ,............ ,....,.... ....,,7
I March, 2005 ii
I
I DRAFT *Trow
I Craighurst Secondary Plan - Master Servicing Report BAlF0013761 A
I 3 Potential for Growth Supported by Groundwater Supply ....,..,.......................,..,...........11
4 Local Factors Affecting Production Well Positioning.............,............,..............,..........18
5 Development Density Subsurface Sewage Disposal.......................,....,..,....,..,..............31
I 5.1 Craighurst Drainage Basins ,..,.,."",., ..'.........,.,....",..,.."...".....,...,.".,.....,...., ,....."...",....36
5,2 Basin 5 Stream Flow..,..,......".".,.. .., ".....,.........."...,.."."".,...............".".."'....,." ".,.....,.37
I 5.3 Pre-Development Peak Flows (m3 Is) .......................'..............,..................... ...., ......,......40
5.4 Storrnwater Pond/Basin Storage Volumes....................,.........,........".............................41
I 5.5 Storrnwater Drainage Works Cost Estimates,..,..........................................."....,..,.........43
6.1 Simcoe County Traffic AADT ....,....,..,..,....................................,......,.....,..,........,.........47
I 6.2 Existing PM Peak Hour Traffic .....,......,..,..................,..........,........,...........,..,............,...48
6.3 Weekday PM Peak Hour Trip Generation........................,..,........,..................,....,..,......50
6.4 Future PM Peak Hour Traffic ..,............,..,..............,........,..,......,....,......,...............,........52
I
I Figures
Figure A Craighurst Secondary Plan Area
I Figure 3,1 Craighurst Secondary Plan - Water Works
Figure 4,1 Craighurst Secondary Plan - Sewage Works
I Figure 5.1 Craighurst Secondary Plan - Drainage Basins
Figure SWM-l Craighurst Secondary Plan - Storrnwater Management Concept
I Figure 6.1 Arterial Road Systems
Figure 6.2 Craighurst Secondary Plan - Transportation
I Appendices
Appendix A: Figures
I Appendix B: Sanitary Sewage
Appendix C: Storrnwater Management
I Appendix D: Transportation
I
I
I March, 2005 iii
I
I *Trow
DRAFT
I
Cralghurst Secondary Plan - Master Servicing Report BAlF0013761A
I 1.0 Executive Summary
I The Township ofOro-Medonte is preparing a Secondary Plan for the community ofCraighurst.
I This Master Servicing Report is a follow-up to a Background Study for Water Supply, Sewage
Disposal, Surface Water and Transportation, and is intended to provide a description of the
services to be provided for development outlined in the Secondary Plan.
I The previous Background Service Study by Trow Associates Inc, was completed in August 2000
in preparation for a report on Craighurst Development Options for the Craighurst Secondary Plan
I by the Planning Partnership (now Meridian Planning Consultants) completed May 3, 2001, This
report reflected the reduction in the initial Secondary Plan area requested by the Nottawasaga
Valley Conservation Authority (NVCA) and recommended that the Secondary Plan proceed with
I future development based on Municipal Water and Sewer services, Meanwhile, the project was
postponed to address an assessment of the Oro-Moraine. Since the Background Study in August
2000, among other things, the Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority completed a
I Watershed Plan for the Willow Creek Watershed which encompasses the Secondary Plan Area,
and is in the process of completing an Assimilative Capacity Study for the Nottawasaga River
Watershed,
I The Service Report is based on limitations in both water supply and wastewater disposal.
Development of about 700 residents, 94 existing residents, a school for approximately 540
I students and approximately 9 hectares of commercial/institutional development are expected to
be supported based on preliminary assessments of the available water supply and waste water
disposal potential. Actual limitations will be based on well testing results and available
I wastewater assimilation limits identified by NVCA and the MOE/MMAH, Class Environmental
Assessments will define the details ofthe Municipal facilities,
I A Stormwater Management Planning and Design Manual for current best management practice
requirements was released by the Ministry of the Environment (MaE) in March 2003,
Stormwater management has changed over the five years since the Background Study was
I undertaken. However, due to the good permeability of the local soils, high rates of infiltration in
existing and newly developed areas can be encouraged, Current stormwater quality and quantity
control requirements for the six drainage basins consist of infiltration wet ponds and infiltration
I extended detention (ponds) to provide enhanced water quality protection and contain the 1:100
year flow to pre-development conditions,
I Background traffic increases due to nearby developments such as Horseshoe Valley Resort will
result in accelerated road capacity requirements. Existing surplus capacity is insufficient for
both the traffic generated from the Secondary Plan and the increase in background traffic over
I the next 10 years. Additionallanes on County Rd 22 approaching the County Roads 22 and 93
intersection will, therefore, be required in future,
I
March, 2005 1
I
I DRAFT *Trow
I Cralghurst Secondary Plan - Master Servicing Report BAlF0013761A
I The Ministry of Transportation and Canadian Pacific Railroad (CPR) do not have current plans
for improvements to Hwy 400 or the CPR rail line.
I Rail traffic will inevitably increase as well in future, Additional vehicle storage lanes will be
warranted on County Road 22 during peak periods as residents become increasingly impatient
with long queues of traffic waiting for the trains to pass each other or stop to switch rail cars,
I Additional lanes approaching the CPR tracks will be required as the first project in future, for
northbound Hwy 400 traffic exiting to County Road 22 eastbound. Based on current traffic and
growth projections this is not expected for several years, Traffic problems are only expected
I during peak hours which will be monitored to warrant the schedule for storage lane construction.
To ensure the efficient build-out of the Craighurst Secondary Plan, development controls
I outlined in the Plan will be necessary to ensure efficient and effective development, recognizing
service limitations and environmental constraints. Municipal inrrastructure Class Environmental
Assessments will be required prior to design and construction of facilities, During this process
I public !lnd review agencies will require the standards of the day, providing new constraints and
opportunities not currently envisioned in the development of the Secondary Plan,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
March, 2005 2
I
I DRAFT *Trow
I
Craighurst Secondary Plan - Master Servicing Report BAlF0013761A
I 2.0 Introduction
I The Township of Oro-Medonte througb its Official Plan directs new development within the
Municipality to existing hamlet (settlement) areas, including Craighurst. In response to existing
I development pressures in the Craighurst area, the Township has initiated preparation of the
Secondary Plan to guide future growth within the community.
I New development in settlement areas, as a first principle, must be supported by municipal
services including water supply and distribution, sanitary sewage collection and treatment,
stormwater management and transportation facilities, This report addresses each of the four
I major municipal services.
2.1 Background
I 2.1.1 Work Program
I To date the Study process has included:
Activitv Descrintion
1. Public Infonnation Centre . Presented Drafts of the following
I renorts to the local rate navers,
2, Craighurst Secondary Plan - Phase I . Reviews Provincial Policy
Background Document Water Supply, . Reviews Oro-Medonte Official Plan as
I Sewage Disposal, Stonnwater and it pertains to growth and servicing
Transportation (August, 2000) . Provide an Inventory Assessment
. Reviews existing services
I . Reviews of constraints and
opportunities
. Identifies servicin!! ontions
I 3. Final Phase 1 Environmental Background . Addresses Natural Heritage component
Study (August, 2000) . Provides Terrestrial and Aquatic
Biological Inventories
I . Provides recommendations for
setbacks ftom water courses
. Identifies areas where development
I should not occur because of
environmental significance
. Identifies the significance of the
I recharge function of the Oro Moraine
in maintaining the quality and quantity
of base flow in cold water streams
I 4, Craighurst Development Options (May, . Assesses development options
2001) including no growth, development on
private/partial services, and
develonment on full municinal services
I
March, 2005 3
I
I DRAFT *Trow
I Cralghurst Secondary Plan - Master Servicing Report BAlF0013761 A
I The following is a description of the tasks that have yet to be completed:
Activitv Description
I 1. Draft Master Servicing Report . Detailed description of the services to
be provided
2, Draft Environmental Impact Study and . Set Terms of Reference for
I Management Plan Development Applications
. Recommend setbacks and buffers for
Natural Heritage features and functions
I and enhancement where appronriate
3, Public Consultation/Circulation . Presentation of the above draft
I documents for comment
I 4, Draft Secondary Plan and Final Master . Finalize Land Use Plan
Servicing Report . Present Draft Policies
. Presentation of Final Master Servicing
I Plan
. Statutorv Public Meetings
5. Finalization of Secondary Plan & . Council Approval
I Adaptation of Plan
Studies commenced on the Craighurst Secondary Plan Area in 2000, In the spring of 2001
I progress on the Secondary Plan was put on hold while land use planning issues on the Oro
Moraine (upon which Craighurst flanks) were addressed, These studies are relevant with respect
to the hydrogeological characterization of the Moraine and the identification of natural heritage
I features adjacent to the Secondary Plan Area.
2.1.2 Preferred Growth Option
I
As a result of screening by the Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority (NVCA) and the
County of Simcoe based on the Background Study, the Secondary Plan Study area was reduced
I to approximately 160 hectares and covers the geographic area shown on Figure A.
I
I
I
I
I
March, 2005 4
I
I
::E
I CONI :!<
LOT 45 to
0J
I CON] W. p, R. CON I
LOT 44 LDT 44 CON I
LOT 44
I
I CON I II. p, R, CON I
LDT43 CDNI
LOT 43 LOT
, ..
I R.
CDN 1 CD,
LOT 42 T 2
I R.
I
I
I
ON I
DT40
I ~
, CDN I II. p, R. CON I
I LDT 39
!~
I I
LOT 38
I I
,I
:>< ~
I 8
I LOT 36 "
~
I eE:::SEIWEfH~~J5::
I Trow Associates Inc.
b.~
:i'Trow 561 Bryne Drive, Un" D Tel: (705) 734-6222
BARRIE, ONTARIO L4N 9Y3 Fax: (705) 734-6224
I SCAlE 1: 20,000 CUENT: JOB NO,
OATE: TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE BAIF0013761 A
FEB 2005 llTLE:
I DRAWN: RG/LC Craighurst Secondary Plan Area FIG A
I *Trow
DRAFT
I
Craighurst Secondary Plan - Master Servicing Report BAlF0013761A
I Existing development in Craighurst consists of approximately 90 single detached residences and
four apartment dwellings. There is one community hall, two churches, one gas station, two
I vehicle repair shops, a grocery and Liquor store, two restaurants and a chocolate factory, The
balance of the lands is predominantly vacant with some lands being used for field crops,
I The basis for the development of the Master Servicing Plan is the concept prepared by Meridian
shown on Figure A. This Plan illustrates the major street pattern to support the land use pattern
options for the Secondary Plan area.
I Development of the Secondary Plan area is based on full municipal water and sewage services,
Previous planning reports have deemed this to be the most effective method to service the
I desired intensity of new growth. The following is an estimate of future land use based on the
municipal servicing option, Note that an existing industrial area is included in the future
employment land use.
I For theyurposes of this study, development phasing is expected to occur at 75 homes per year,
I The developable land available for residential and commercial lots excludes lands needed for
schools, churches, parks, environmental lands, stormwater facilities, etc.
Table 1
I Secondary Plan Land Use
Land Use Area (ha)
I Hazard
Land/Green
Space!
I Development Active Passive Stormwater
Sectors Residential Commercial Parks Parks School Manal!ement Totat
Existing
Development 34 7 48
I North
Quadrant 40 I 4 5 8 58
South .
I Quadrant 36 2 I 6 51
Total 110 9 2 4 5 14 160
I
I
I
I
March, 2005 6
I
I DRAFT *Trow
I
Cralghurst Secondary Plan - Master Servicing Report BAlF0013761A
I The following table sununarizes the estimated future population for the Secondary Plan Area,
Table 2
I Secondary Plan Population
Residential
I School
Develonment Sectors Area No. Residences PODulation Students
Existin" Develonment 34 94 282
I North Quadrant 40 400 1,200 540
South Quadrant 36 300 900
Total 794 2,382 540
I To provide a variety for residential market selection the proposed residential land use mix is as
follows:
I 30% - 18 meter frontage
30% - 15 meter rrontage
I 30% - 12 meter frontage
10% - multi-residential townhouse/semi-detached
I Based on the net developable area available for residential development (76 hectares), the
density of future residential development would be 9,2 units per hectare, If no more than 700
new units were constructed. This density is significantly less than typical new development in
I Barrie,
An additional commercial allocation of 50,000 square feet is also proposed in the Secondary
I Plan, An elementary school with a capacity for about 540 students and one Place of Worship are
also proposed.
I 2.1.3 Constraints to Development
The opportunities and constraints to development with respect to each major servicing item are
I discussed below,
I 2.1.3.1 Water Supply
The preferred source of water supply for the Community of Craighurst is the lower sand aquifer
I which is regionally extensive and offers a high potential for providing a long term safe yield and
secure water quality. Based on a conservative projection of the capture zone for the Community
of Craighurst, a groundwater source rrom the lower aquifer could supply approximately 900
I households.
New wells and storage facilities are required to serve the residential demands of about 800 units
I and about 131 equivalent units of non-residential development for 9 ha commercial and about 5
March, 2005 7
I
I *Trow
DRAFT
I
Cralghurst Secondary Plan - Master Servicing Report BAlF0013761 A
I ha of institutional development. The existing water system is designed for about 166 people or
55 units and 2,1 hectares of commercial development or about 65 equivalent units, Therefore the
I future water system needs to service about 866 equivalent units
2.1.3.2 Sewage Treatment
I The location of a municipal sewage treatment plant is dictated by gravity and location of the
receiving water body, ie. down gradient hydraulic boundary, Matheson Creek and its tributaries
I are considered to be the down gradient boundaries and are confIrmed to be coldwater fIsh
habitat. Therefore, direct surface water discharge from a sewage treatment facility must cool the
effluent and ensure that the discharge parameters of concern are within acceptable limits. The
I other available treatment options meeting the discharge constraints include: secondary treatment
(i.e. primary treatment with biological treatment), or tertiary treatment with discharge to either
storage lagoons and then via spray irrigation, or rapid inftltration to the overburden,
I The Ministry of the Environment (MOE) responded in a letter dated February 21, 2005 to a letter
from Trow Associates Inc. that requested Ministry of the Environment requirements, constraints
I and discharge criteria for acceptable effluent disposal altematives in order to complete the
Secondary Plan, and a waste water facility Class Environmental Assessment for the Village of
Craighurst.
I The MOE letter (in the Appendix) identifIed that the "Province has expressed serious concerns
over the last year or so about the capacity of the Nottawasaga River watershed to assimilate the
I impacts of approved and fUture urban development'. Further, that "in the absence of
information about the assimilative capacity of the watershed', the Ministry of Environment has
stated that "it is not in a position to recommend more urban development, Efforts are
I proceeding to provide this required information",
Consequently, the completion of the current assimilative capacity study of the Willow Creek
I watershed, (subsequent to the Willow Creek Watershed Study of2001) is necessary to determine
the discharge requirements for sewage disposal options.
I 2.1.3.3 Stormwater Drainage
There are six drainage basins that fall within the Secondary Plan Study area and four have ever
I flowing and/or intermittent watercourses, Watercourses are to be protected with a 60 meter wide
buffer corridor. It is felt that the buffer is adequate in terms of flood zone protection for lands
lying upstream of the CPR,
I Native soils are conducive to inftltration techniques employed to average stormwater for base
flow maintenance and surface runoff quality control.
I Where stormwater quantity control facilities are required, they must be situated within the most
downstream location before discharging into the receiving watercourse.
I
March, 2005 8
I
I DRAFT *Trow
I
Craighurst Secondary Plan - Master Servicing Report BAlFOO13761 A
I 2.1.3.4 Transportation
The intersection of County Road 22 (Horseshoe Valley Road) and County Road 93
I (Penetanguishene Road) is the hub of the Craighurst Community, Both roads are considered to
be County arterial roads. Horseshoe Valley Road serves as a connecting link between Highway
11/12 and Highway 26, Penetanguishene Road (formerly Highway 93) is a local arterial road
I that provides an alternate north/south route to Highway 400.
Since Horseshoe Valley Road provides a higher level of service than Penetanguishene Road, the
I amount of entrances to Horseshoe Valley Road should be kept to a minimum, In addition, other
considerations such as, commercial activities, delays at the CPR crossing and delays at the
County Road intersection will require mitigating measures such as road widening through the
I Community, and establishing alternate routes to access Highway 400.
Road or rail upgrades by other agencies for County roads, Highway 400 or the CPR rail are not
I scheduled within the foreseeable future. Transportation upgrades needed for development on
County Roads 22 and 93 will be done by the County. The cost-share for the development of the
County road work could be paid through a County/Municipal Development Charge.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
March, 2005 9
I
I *Trow
DRAFT
I
Cralghurst Secondary Plan - Master Servicing Report
BAlF0013761A
I 3.0 Water Supply, Storage and Distribution
I 3.1 Existing Water Supply
I Craighurst is currently supplied with potable water by individual wells and two communal water
systems. The communal water systems consist of the Craighurst Estates Water Works and the
Snider Well.
I The essentials of the Craighurst Estates water system include:
I . three wells with a combined capability of 352 Llmin (77 Igpm);
. a 112 m3 underground storage reservoir; four centrifugal pumps (three at 198 Llmin (44
I Igpm) and one at 702 Llmin (154 Igpm));
. '150 liter pressure tanks; a combined Permit to Take Water of 522,720 Llday; and,
I . a 150 mm diameter watermain loop on Procee Circle,
It is designed for 166 people and 2.11 hectares of commercial area, or an Average Day Demand
I of 77.8 m3/d, Maximum Day Demand of 162 Llmin, peak hour demand of 6,6 Lis, and a fire
demand of 16,6 Lis over 2 hours, The system is limited in terms of providing additional
capacity, In total the system has the capability to supply about 55 units residential and about 10
I equivalent units for commercial development (400 Ipcd)
The Snider Well is a private communal water system reportedly capable of supplying 273 Llmin
I (60 Igpm) over four hours, It has no disinfection and residences/businesses have been
disconnecting from the system over the past few years.
I The existing water supply problems include:
less than anticipated production from the Craighurst Estate wells;
-
I - no treatment facilities at the Snider well;
- several domestic wells completed in the shallow sand aquifer are contaminated, or are
I vulnerable to contamination from surface water sources; and,
- Network fire suppression capabilities are limited to the Craighurst Estates Water System.
I An existing water supply source is available. A lower groundwater supply aquifer is capable of
I supplying approximately 2,233 cubic meters per day subject to the construction and successful
pump testing of a production well, This supply must accommodate residential plus commercial
and institutional water demands (in terms of equivalent population).
r
March, 2005 10
I
I *Trow
DRAFT
I
Cralghurst Secondary Plan - Master Servicing Report BAlF0013761A
I Of the approximately 110 existing wells within the study area, approximately 11 are completed
in the lower aquifer unit (not including the Craighurst Estate wells), while the source of 22 wells
I is unknown.
For new development in the Secondary Plan area, the source of potable water should be the
I lower sand and gravel aquifer, Further, to enhance fIre protection capability and ensure
adequately treated water is provided to residents, a municipal system( s) is preferred over
individual wells.
I 3.2 Future Water Supply
I The lower sand and gravel aquifer is recommended as the preferred altemative for a municipal
water supply source for the following reasons:
I . The lower aquifer offers a higher level of security in terms of water quality,
. Most existing individual wells are completed in the upper sand and gravel aquifer,
I therefore, the possibility of communal/private well interference is reduced if separate
aquifers are used for ground water supply.
. The lower aquifer is regionally extensive and offers a higher potential for the upper limit
I oflong term safe yield than the upper sand and gravel aquifer.
The amount of future development that can be supported by each aquifer is estimated as follows
I and subject to confIrmation by further investigation including long term pump tests (72 hours),
Table 3
I Potential for Growth Supported by
Groundwater Supply
I Supply
% of Annual Potential Potential
Iuflltration Long Term Safe Service No. of
I Estimated (250 mm/yr) Yield Based ou Populatiou at Households at
Aquifer Area Extent Reaching Annual 450 3.0 persons
(ha) Aouifer RecharIJe LId/nerson(l) Her household
I Upper Sand and
Gravel :t200 75% 375,000 m'/yr 2,280 760(2)
Lower Sand and
Gravel >1,000 25% >450 000 m' /vr(3) 2,740 910
I ,
(I) MOE Guidelines suggest that groundwater supplies be capable of providing 450 Lid/person (100 IGPD).
(2) Must consider number of households outside of Study Area serviced by this aquifer.
(3) Based on the recharge area coinciding with the total 714 hectare watershed aTea located upstream of the
I Secondary Plan Study Area.
Long Term Safe Yield is based on annual recharge at 25% of250 mmlyr infIltrating to the lower
r aquifer. Annual recharge of 450,000 m3/yr is the estimated Long Term Safe Yield subject to
March,2005 11
I
I *Trow
DRAFT
I
Cralghurst Secondary Plan - Master Servicing Report BAlF0013761A
I confIrmation through additional investigation including long term Pump tests (72 hours), This
water supply will accommodate population (equivalent) of approximately 2,740 persons or about
900 Units, However, there is unknown water use by others for this recharge water to be
I considered as well, A potential supply for 850 Units is expected,
The water will be distributed through the Secondary Plan as follows:
I Institutional - Church - 70 seats 8 L per seat 0.56 m3/d
- School - 540 students 30 Uday 16.4 m3/d
I - 4 staff 50 Uday 0,2 m3/d
Commercial - 28,000 m2 @ 5 Um2 140 m3/d
I Non-Residential Total 157.2 m3/d
Non-Residential Equivalent Population @ 450 Uday 350 people
Non-Residential Equivalent Units 116 resident units
I (New Gommercial of 50,000 sq. ft. represents about 17 of the 116 equivalent residential units)
I Residential Development is expected in two phases:
Phase 1 north of Horseshoe Valley Road 400 Units
Phase 2south of Horseshoe Valley Road 300 Units
Existing Development 94 Units
I Total 794 homes
I A rate of 450 liters per capacity per day (lpcd) is normally used to reflect the MOE
recommendation that groundwater supplies be able to supply 450 Ipcd, This rate also accounts
for higher water use expected for larger lots (lawn watering); sub-urban environment and less
I strict water conservation measures expected for developments of this nature.
The total residential and non-residential water demand will be about 910 equivalent residential
I units which is more than the potential water supply at 450 Ipd. However, it is common to see
water usage at less than 400 liters per person per day. In fact, residential water use of 350 liters
per day is most common, This is especially true with current plumbing requirements for low
I flush toilets and water saving devices, Water use at 400 liters per person per day is
recommended. The non-residential equivalent flow results in 131 resident units to total 931
equivalent units at 1,200 liters per unit. This totals a need for 1,117,2 m3/d,
I The long term safe yield of the aquifer must also be investigated further to determine available
water supply limits. For the purposes of the Secondary Plan and Provincial Policies for
I inrrastructure effIciencies, we recommend the wells be developed for the maximum safe water
yield of 1,230 m3/d (for future and existing development), using approximately 400 liters per
person per day.
I Additional design parameters are as follows:
Average Day water usagelunit demand 400 Ud per person
r Density for development 3 people per unit
March, 2005 12
r
I DRAFT *Trow
I
Cralghurst Secondary Plan - Master Servicing Report BAlF0013761A
I The entire Secondary Plan area can be serviced by one pressure zone, Consequently, facilities
are not needed to pressurize more than one zone.
I Storage options primarily consist of central storage or local storage. The type of storage is also
dependent on development phasing, Central and elevated storage is best constructed at one time
for the total serviced population, Constmcting two elevated storage tanks is almost twice as
I expensive as constructing one for the storage volumes needed for Craighurst. Elevated storage
also impacts the aesthetic environment so one versus two tanks is normally preferable.
I Underground storage (itself without the pumps) is less expensive than elevated storage and
allows some construction phasing, Some storage is also necessary for disinfectant contact time,
pump cycling, peak hour and instantaneous water demands, Standby generators provide power
I for domestic and fire flow pumps to provide maximum daily flow and fire flow at all times,
Both elevated and underground storage can provide water for fire suppression with tank trucks,
I 3.3.2 Local Underground Storage
I This option will provide local underground storage at each of the two new well sites,
Water supply from more than one storage source has higher reliability,
I Local underground pumped storage consists of a concrete storage reservoir normally constructed
underground, booster pumps for peak hour flows, hydropneumatic tanks for instantaneous flows,
I a disinfection system, a fire flow pump and a standby power generator.
Smaller facilities typically require more pronounced peak flows. Fire protection needs are not
I correlated to the size of the service area but are based on suppression needs for a single fire
regardless of service area. For predominantly residential development fire flows ftom fire
hydrants are expected to be at least 38 L/sec.
I The Craighurst Estates water system has about 112 m3 of storage, pumped to the distribution
system. A diesel generator and fire pump provide 16.6 L/sec fire protection (219 gpm). Since
I this storage and fire flow are currently insufficient for Craighurst Estates, additional storage and
fire flow capacity will significantly benefit the Craighurst Estates residents,
I MOE requirements for 110 L/sec reflect fire protection needs for larger non-residential buildings
and multi-residential buildings expected in Communities over 2,000 people, To provide fire
protection to meet MOE guidelines for the Secondary Plan it is proposed that 48 L/sec for two
I hours be provided for both phases in addition to the 16.6 Llsec available from Craighurst Estates,
Phase 1
I Existing Development 105 Units (equivalent)
New Phase 1 Development 400 Units
I
March,2005 14
I
I *Trow
DRAFT
I
Cralghurst Secondary Plan - Master Servicing Report BAlF0013761A
I Fire Flow 48 L/ sec
Craighurst Fire Flow 16.6 L/sec
Total Fire Flow 64.6 L/sec
I Fire Flow Storage 465 m3
25% Equalization Storage' 341 m3
I Emergency @ 25% 202 m3
Total Storage 1,008 m3
Existing Craighurst Estates 112 m3
I Net Storage Required 896 m3
An underground reservoir 16 m x 16 m x 3,7 m will accommodate the Phase 1 storage
I requirements in conjunction with Craighurst Estates, Craighurst Estates fire protection and
pressure problems will be improved as well when the Phase 1 water system comes on line,
I Phase 2
Existing Development 105 Units Equivalent
I Phase 2 Development 300 Units
Fire Flow 48 L/ sec
Fire flow Storage 346 m3
I 25% Equalization 273 m3
25% Emergency 155 m3
Total Required 774 m3
I An underground reservoir 15 m x 15 m x 3.7 will accommodate the Phase 2 storage
requirements,
I The total storage is 1,782 m3 versus 1,855 m3 to provide wells for the total aquifer recharge
I ability. Consequently, 40% more storage should be provided at each Well site (Phase 1 and
Phase 2),
- Phase 1 - 935 m3
I - Phase 2 - 808 m3
I 3.3.3 Central Storage
Central storage consists of two types:
I 1. Underground or grade storage with a booster pumping station; and,
I 2, Elevated storage directly filled ITom the well pumps or booster pumps,
Storage requirements for both types of central storage are as identified above at 1,855 m3.
I
March, 2005 15
I
I DRAFT ~Trow
I
Cralghurst Secondary Plan - Master Servicing Report BAlFOO13761A
I 3.3.3.1 Central Underground Storage
Central underground or at grade pumped storage. This type of storage requires a booster
I pumping station to meet pressure needs similar to local underground pumped storage,
Operation for this storage option will see disinfected well water pumped directly to the
I underground ,central storage facility. Disinfected water will be booster pumped to the
distribution system to meet fire, peak hour and instantaneous peak flows.
I The advantages and disadvantages of a central underground pumped storage are as follows:
. ,Construction costs are less than elevated storage and more than one underground
I storage facility;
. Booster pump facilities at one location are less expensive than for two or more
I . facilities. However, booster pumps are not required for elevated storage;
. Central facilities have higher initial cost for phasing, Expandability is feasible at
I more cost for larger volumes, but the total size needed for future is usually
constructed for smaller volumes such as this Secondary Plan; and,
I . Pump phasing is usual to postpone some costs initially.
3.3.3.2 Central Elevated Storage
I Central elevated storage will receive disinfected well water directly from the well, The weight of
the water in the elevated storage tank will provide domestic and fire flow pressures for the entire
I Secondary Plan area. The advantages and disadvantages of this option are as follows:
. Elevated storage is aesthetically noticeable and can be considered acceptable for
I community promotion or unacceptable by other people.
. Elevated storage should be constructed initially for the total Secondary Plan needs since
I phasing is not available by this option, Initial capital costs are the highest for this option
but operating costs are the lowest. Booster pumps are not required but well pumps must
pump to the higher elevation at the top water level in the tank,
I
. Local storage at the well is not required. If pressurized disinfection contact time is
provided at the well location the disinfected well water can be pumped directly to the
distribution system, The standby generator requirements and costs are much lower for
this option.
. Overall elevated storage with pressurized disinfection contact time at the well location is
the preferred operating system, This provides source water at the well and the storage
reservoir to balance the supply to the water distribution system.
March, 2005 16
I DRAFT *Trow
I
Cralghursl Secondary Plan - Master Servicing Report BAlF0013761A
I 3.4 Well Locations
Well location is flexible and can be located to advantage provided the lower aquifer can be
I accessed. Due to topography the cost of constructing the well at the lowest surface elevation
above the aquifer is the least. The cost to drill the well is usually lower than the cost to construct
dedicated pipe to storage facilities.
I Locating wells away from storage facilities provides water sources from both the wells and the
storage facility if pressurized disinfection contact time is provided at the well location. This is
I very beneficial in balancing the distribution system and reduces pipe requirements for water
transmission for overall distribution system cost savings.
I Potential areas of access to the lower aquifer include:
1) The Snider well (MOE Well No.1814), which taps into a sand and gravel unit
I approximately 20 meters thick at 70 meters depth, (This well is close to the Cemetery)
2) An extensive sand aquifer of approximately 50 meters thick under artesian conditions
I found commencing at 25 meters depth in the vicinity ofMOE Well No, 11090, which
is located on the west side of the CPR west of the Craigburst Estates subdivision.
(This Well location is close to a potential wastewater discharge area,)
I 3) An extensive gravel aquifer of unknown thickness and encountered at relatively
shallow depths of between 25 and 50 meters confined by clay and till south of County
I Road 22.
Other local factors that must be considered when positioning a production well, including the
I location of supply wells outside of the Secondary Plan area and potential sources of
contamination to the water supply. The following table summarizes local issues with respect to
production well positioning,
I
I
I
I
I
I
March, 2005 17
I
I '*Trow
DRAFT
I
Cralghurst Secondary Plan - Master Servicing Report BAlF0013761A
I Table 4
Local Factors Affecting
Production Well Positioninl!
I Item Concern Discussion
Highway 400 Chlorides & sodium fi'om road salt Highway 400 is an area where there
is an upward hydraulic gradient; as a
I result, the road salt is washed away
to surface water because of the
upward hydraulic gradient of
I Ilfoundwater flow,
County Roads 22 and 93 Chlorides & sodium fi'om road salt Salting levels are lower than
Highway 400, however, there is a
downward hydraulic gradient and
I the potential for salt contamination
to the upper aquifer exists, The
lower aquifer is protected by surface
I contamination due to it being
confined bv clav and till lavers,
Cemeteries Various contaminants The Presbyterian Cemetery is
located beside the Snider Well, and
I the Anglican Cemetery is located on
County Road 93 south of County
Road 22. In both instances the
I lower aquifer is protected by
overlvin" clav and till lavers,
Active Livestock Various contaminants Existing livestock operation located
south of SE quadrant. As described
I above, the clay and till layers that
overly the lower aquifer protects it
fi'om contamination by surface
I sources.
Subsurface Sewage Disposal Nitrates & biological contamination Existing development is supported
by individual septic systems. As
described above, the clay and till
I layers that overly the lower aquifer
protects it fi'om contamination by
surface sources.
I Surrounding Wells Interference Those areas outside of the
Secondary Plan relying on
groundwater supply include several
residences fi'onting County Roads 22
I and 93, and estate residential
development located 1.0 Ian to the
southeast. There is adequate supply
I to provide water to existing
development as well as new
development.
I
I
March, 2005 18
I
I DRAFT ~Trow
I
Craighurst Secondary Plan - Master Servicing Report BAlF0013761A
I Table 4 (Continued)
Local Factors Affecting
I Production Well Positioning
Surrounding Wells Interference However, to avoid complaints of
I drawdown interference, the
production well should be removed
ITom adjacent concentrated
I development to the southeast by at
least 1.0 Ian.
Proximity to Storage Facilities Reduced piping It is preferable to locate the
production well in close proximity to
I the storage facility, If elevated
storage is desired then the well
should be situated at the highest
I point of land which would place it
somewhere in the east quadrant,
However, other constraints may
dictate an alternate location,
I Phasing of Development Financing The Secondary Plan development
areas are split into three district
units, the North Quadrant, South
I Quadrant and Existing
Devclopment. It may be desirable to
initially service each area
indenendentlv.
I Source Protection Well Head Protection and Source Sufficient area around the Well head
Protection (50 meters diameter) should be
provided to ensure surface sources
I of contaminants cannot migrate
down the well over time (i.e, well
casing annulus), Source water
protection legislation and
I stewardship by the NVCA is
expected to address source water
DTotection concerns.
I Since it is desirable that development of the North and the South Quadrant of the Secondary
Planning Area proceed consecutively, it is feasible to implement potable groundwater supply
I sources as follows:
1) Continue to use the Craighurst Estates water supply systems
I 2) No change for existing development at the outset.
f 3) Construct test wells to determine well and aquifer yield,
4) Construct elevated storage for 1,855 m3 or as confIrmed by potential water supply from
I well tests,
March, 2005 19
I
I DRAFT *Trow
I Cralghurst Secondary Plan - Master Servicing Report BAlFOO13761A
I 5) Develop a production well in the North Quadrant at the north limit of the Passive Park,
extending services to existing development not serviced by the Craighurst Estates Water
Works and fill the new elevated storage reservoir,
I 6) Develop a second production well, located in the southern section of the Secondary Plan
area east of the CPR, in the active Community Park, to service those areas that cannot be
I serviced by the above, and the area within the South Quadrant.
7) Interconnect the three water supply systems by connecting trunk water mains to service
I the entire Secondary Plan Area,
The number of wells for each location is dependent on the production of each well. Long
I term 72 hour pump tests are required to determine well production,
Permit to Take Water requirements are changing such that actual water taking is monitored,
I and permits are restricted to usage, However, Permits to Take Water are still issued by the
MOE on a first come first serve basis, Since the Township encourages development to occur
in settlement areas such as Craighurst, the water supply should be available to realize Phase 2
I development in the southern portion of the Secondary Plan in the future, However, test wells
and 72 hour pump test should be completed as early as possible to confirm a sufficient water
supply is available to fully develop the area and consider other development applications in
I the aquifer recharge area,
I 3.5 Water Supply Facilities
The water supply facilities consist of:
I . Wells and pumps;
. Pump controls, alarms, etc.;
I . Chlorine Disinfection system;
. Oversized piping for chlorine contact upstream of the first water user;
I . On-line Chlorine Residual analyzer and sample ports;
. Diesel Standby Generator for the system capable of maximum well house power
I requirements;
. Telemetry (telephone) alarming system; and,
I . Treatment facilities for sand, turbidity filters and mineral treatment may be required
depending on water condition. However, at this time treatment oflower aquifer water is
I not considered necessary to meet Safe Drinking Water Standards,
Well construction as per Ontario Regulation 903 and MaE requirements for Permits to Take
I Water is required. Well Head Protection should include:
March, 2005 20
I
I DRAFT *Trow
I Cralghurst Secondary Plan - Master Servicing Report BAlF0013761A
I . flood protection by elevating the top of the casing at least 300 mm above the potential
flood levels;
I . Proper well cap and seal;
. Lot grading to ensure surface water access and ponding in the vicinity of the well does
not infiltrate through the well seal over time; and,
I . Routine Well inspections, maintenance and rehabilitation over time.
I Design and construction of water storage, pumping and treatment facilities must follow the
Environmental Assessment Act for which Class Environmental Assessment procedures have
been developed by the Municipal Engineers Association. Ministry of the Environment approval
I under the Ontario Water Resources Act is also necessary for new water facilities.
3.6 Water Distribution Network
I The water distribution system shall be a lopped network as illustrated on Figure 3,1,
I Water distribution pipe minimum 150 mm diameter
Water service to each lot individual19 mm diameter
I -
Fire Hydrants, spacing 170 meters apart
I Ultimate fire flow to commercial area 95 - 110 L/sec
The entire Secondary Plan can be serviced within one pressure zone. As such, water distribution
I main will be directly interconnected between the Phases and to the existing Craighurst Estate
system,
I Water pressure extremes are expected at the east and west limits of the Secondary Plan, High
pressures at the lowlands along the west limit and low pressures along the highlands near the east
limit of the Secondary Plan can be expected, However, operating pressures are still within the
I design guidelines.
The existing distribution system can provide adequate fire flow. Water service to extstmg
I development will provide fire protection, Water distribution pipe and property services can be
provided to existing development under Section 326 of the Municipal Act. The Act allows the
municipality to service the existing property and recover costs,
I Water distribution network analysis using a recognized method based on Hardy Cross, Newton
Rapson or similar shall be undertaken to ensure design flows can be delivered at design
I pressures,
The water distribution system may require private right-of-ways or easements to loop the water
I network across drainage courses along the west limit of the Secondary Plan, Watermain
March, 2005 21
I
I *Trow
DRAFT
I
Craighurst Secondary Plan - Master Servicing Report BAiF0013761 A
I extension loops through easements are promoted at the end of cul-de-sacs to prevent dead ends
that cause water quality deterioration.
I Water supply from the storage reservoir and the three Well locations within the Secondary Plan
results in shorter lengths of watermain between sources, and the furthest demand and highest
I demand are less distance away than water provided from one source. The lower friction losses
result in smaller diameter watermain, such that the maximum size of watermain needed to
deliver maximum day plus fire flow is 250 mm diameter,
I Water distribution depends on development density and location but typically consists of the
following pipe size:
I . 300 mm diameter watermain to the elevated storage tank;
I . 250 rtun diameter sized watermain on County Road 93 and County Road 22 to serve
.commercial areas;
. 250 mm diameter on major collector roads through Phase 1 and Phase 2 to deliver water
I from new wells to the trunk watermain on County Roads 22 and 93;
. 200 mm diameter sized watermain on major collector roads from the 250 mm diameter
I trunk watermain; and,
. 150 mm diameter (minimum) sized watermain within local roads, crescents, cul-de-sacs
I and loop extensions,
3.7 Costs
I Typical cOsts ate as follows for the three water supply options:
I A) Central Elevated Storage with two Wells $1,500,000
pumping directly to the distribution system
B) Central Underground Storage with two $1,680,000
I Wells pumping directly to the underground
storage with a booster pumping station, fire
pumps, generator, etc.
I C) Local Underground storage with one well,
booster pumps, fire pumps, generator, etc,
Local Phase 1 $1,145,000
I Local Phase 2 $1,075,000
Total $2,220,000
I Operating and maintenance costs are the least for the elevated storage option,
I
March, 2005 22
I
I *Trow
DRAFT
I
Cralghurst Secondary Plan - Master Servicing Report BAlF0013761A
I Based on the existing water service for Craighurst Estates (at 65 equivalent units), the cost of the
elevated storage water supply option is about $1,730 per unit (equivalent)
I Costs for water distribution pipe, valving, fire hydrant, etc. is about $2,300 per unit (equivalent)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
March. 2005 23
I
I *Trow
DRAFT
I
Cralghurst Secondary Plan - Master Servicing Report
BAlF0013761A
I 4.0 Sanitary Sewage Collection and Disposal
I 4.1 General
I There are no communal sewage systems witbin the Secondary Plan Area. Existing development
has been supported by individual conventional Class IV subsurface sewage systems.
I The Conceptual Plan for tbe Secondary Plan identifies tbat "tbe development of tbe Craighurst
Community on tbe basis of full municipal services represents good planning", Central sewage
I treatment facilities are also tbe option of choice by the Ministry of tbe Environment.
Central sewage treatment facilities offer a high level of treatment for clean discharge effluent and
I allow more efficient use ofland for mixed development.
There ire several altemative sewage collection and treatment systems that can be employed.
I Sewage treatment typically involves primary treatment to remove solids, secondary treatment to
permit biological activity and purification, and tertiary treatment to remove nutrients and further
puritY tbe effluent before discharge, (In a conventional Class IV sewage system, the septic tank
I provides botb primary treatment, and initiates secondary treatment. The subsurface distribution
system completes secondary treatment. Tertiary treatment is provided by filtering effluent
I through the underlying soils.)
Alternative treatment systems include, but are not limited to tbe following:
I Subsurface Disposal of Effluent
. Peat/biofilters
I . Recirculation sand filters
I . Infiltration lagoons
. Large communal tile beds
I Subsurface or Surface Water Disposal of Effluent
I . Activated sludge witb aeration or extended aeration
. Rotary biological contactors
I . Sequential batch reactors
I . Lagoons witb or witbout aeration
March, 2005 24
I
I *Trow
DRAFT
I
Craighurst Secondary Plan - Master Servicing Report BAlF0013761 A
I . Biological membrane systems
I . And others
Groundwater Surface Disposal of Effluent
I . Lagoons with spray irrigation or snowfluent discharge
I Sewage Collection
Altemative sewage collection systems include, but are not limited to, the following collection
I systems:
. Conventional gravity sewers
I . Small bore sewers
. Pressure systems
I
. Vacuum systems
I The method of sewage collection can have a bearing on the amount of groundwater infiltration
that must be treated, Small bore sewers and pressurelvacuum systems have lower infiltration
volumes, However, conventional gravity sewers are reliable, virtually maintenance free, and
I have virtually no operating costs,
I In addition, sewage collection systems that incorporate holding or septic tanks can reduce peak
sewage flows that must be dealt with by both the collection system and treatment facility.
I Local soils and overburden characteristics are favourable for subsurface sewage disposal which
will enhance groundwater recharge. The second option is to discharge to a receiving surface
water in tributaries to Matheson Creek or Craig's swamp, Matheson Creek is identified as a cold
I water fishery that requires sewage effluent to be cooled if discharged directly to the creek.
Craig's swamp, a wetland, has the ability to treat wastewater effluent to a high level, and may
benefit from the additional flow and nutrients produced by a municipal sewage treatment facility,
I 4.2 Wastewater Flows
I It is anticipated that the existing commercial and residential development will connect to the new
sewage treatment facilities in due course, New development in the Secondary Plan forecast in
Section 2 of this report will require wastewater services similar to the water requirements
I identified in Section 3: "Water Supply Storage and Distribution",
I
March, 2005 25
I
I *'Trow
DRAFT
I
Cralghurst Secondary Plan - Master Servicing Report
BAlF0013761 A
I Total residential development is expected in two phases 400 units in Phase 1 and 300 units in
Phase 2. Existing development is about 100 units and non-residential development results in
I about 131 equivalent residential units.
Both residential and non-residential wastewater flows are typically about 70 to 75% of water
I supply, MOE Policy stipulates a flow of 1,000 L/day per residential unit. Section 3.2 identifies
water demand for development of 931 equivalent residential units at 400 liters per capita per day
(1,200 liters/unit), The objective of developing the water supply to 1,230 m3/d will result in
I about 923 m3/d of wastewater produced at 75%. The MOE Policy of 1,000 liters per unit results
in 931 m3/d.
I In addition to the 931 m3/d average daily flow from residential and non-residential development
in the Secondary Plan, infiltration to the sanitary sewer system is added, The total developed
area serviced by sanitary sewers is about 100 ha, and the equivalent service population is 2,793
I people. MOE design criteria for new sewage facilities for new development require that:
1) Strict control should be provided by the municipality to ensure sewer services from
I Property line to new buildings will be implemented to prevent sump pumps; footing
drain and roof drain connections to the sanitary sewer, and insure proper building
service construction and connections,
I 2) Adequate design and inspection during construction of both the municipal sewer and
property services, and private services to the building.
I 3) Routine inspection and maintenance programs are III place by the
municipalityloperating authority to insure a tight system is maintained,
I Subject to these conditions an infiltration rate for sewage facilities such as pumping stations and
treatment facilities is 90 L/day per person.
I The size of the Sewage Plant as a result of both raw sewage collection and inflowlinfiltration to
service the build-out of the Secondary Plan is 1,183 m3/d (average daily flow),
I Maximum daily flow for wastewater facilities is related to stormwater inflow/infiltration and
total water consumption/disposal, (similar to water facilities), Maximum daily flows and peak
I hour flows are equalized in the design of the wastewater facilities and are cushioned by
averaging and storage in the collection system. A maximum daily flow of 3,000 m3/d is based
on a peak factor of 2,5,
I In addition to wastewater from the Secondary Plan, the ability to expand for septage disposal or
to temporarily back-up other Municipal Sewage Treatment Plants should be considered,
I Discharge criteria are set by the MOE Southwestern Region. Currently, the MOE are involved
with an assimilation study for the Nottawasaga River watershed and will not provide discharge
I criteria, The timing for completion of the study is unknown at this time,
March, 2005 26
I
I *Trow
DRAFT
I
Cralghurst Secondary Plan - Master Servicing Report BAlF0013761A
I Once discharge criteria are identified the level of treatment and flow restrictions can be
established. Flow restrictions are not expected when discharge is better than background water
I quality levels. However, the ability of soils to infiltrate wastewater effluent will determine if
sufficient infiltration area is available for subsurface disposal or spray irrigation/snowfluent
options. Based on the assessment undertaken during the Background Study the permeable soils
I are suitable for infiltration, Additional field investigation will be needed to defme the infiltration
area for the Municipal Sewage Treatment Plant during the Class Environmental Assessment.
I Biosolids
Biosolids production is similar for all alternative treatment processes and must be disposed
I typically by land application, or by composting, Although the Class Environmental Assessment
for the wastewater Treatment Plant will address biosolids disposal options biosolids disposal is
not a limiting issue.
I 4.3 Sewage Collection
I In deciding on sewage collection systems several considerations must be taken into account.
i) The undulating topography may required deep burial of gravity sewers and possibly
I necessitates the use of pumping stations and the expropriation of easements, if same
cannot be obtained in a cooperative manner,
I ii) Native soils are favourable with respect to the construction of underground utilities such
as sewers,
I iii) There could be dewatering problems in low lying areas, This could impede construction
of sewers, and potentially impact adjacent shallow wells,
I Of the various types of sewage collection systems gravity sanitary sewers are the preferred
method of collection for the Secondary Plan,
I Topography predominantly dictates the direction of gravity sewer flow, Topography sloping to
the northwest will discharge to a trunk sewer flowing to the sewage plant as illustrated on Figure
4,1. It is anticipated that the trunk sewer will run along the east or west side of the CPR.
I Typically, pumping is required to lift wastewater to the headworks of a sewage treatment plant.
Some times the pumps are located within the plant and sometimes pumping stations are external.
I The option of constructing a deep trunk sewer to intercept branch gravity sewers flowing along
each drainage basin or to construct more than one pumping station with smaller trunk sewers was
investigated,
I Figure 4.1 identifies gravity trunk sewers along the west side of the CPR to the Sewage
Treatment Plant. A small Pumping Station is needed for the south portion of Employment Land
I east of Highway 400, The remainder of the Secondary Plan is drained by gravity sewers,
March, 2005 27
I
I *Trow
DRAFT
I
Cralghurst Secondary Plan - Master Servicing Report BAlF0013761 A
I Design should follow MOE and Ontario Provincial Standards, The following criteria should be
used for design of sanitary sewer works within developments,
I Single Family Dwellings 1,000 Lid
Multi-Family Dwellings 800 Lid
I Commercial Development 5 Llm2
Schools - Students 30 Lid per student
- Full time staff 50 Lid per person
I Church 8 Lid Per seat
Peak Flows Harmon equation
Infiltration 0.1 L/ha/s peak
I Minimum Sewer Size 200 mm dia.
MinimUm Sewer Service 100 mm dia,
Minimum Velocity 0.8 meters per sec,
I Maximum Slope 8%
4.4 Disposal Options
I Sewage disposal by municipal sewage treatment facilities is governed by the ability of the
receiving options to accept sewage effluent into the environment.
I In selecting the preferred sewage treatment system, the constraints and opportunities presented
within the Secondary Plan Study Area are listed as follows:
I Sewage Disposal to Subsurface Groundwater Flow
I 1, Groundwater flow adjacent to wetland areas west and north of the Study Area has an
upward hydraulic gradient. This presents a hydraulic boundary to effluent plume
dispersion in groundwater, and is therefore, the limit of application of MOE Policy B-
I 7 (Reasonable Use). This changes the criteria used to establish level of impact. (In
effect, the only constraint to subsurface sewage disposal becomes the ability of the
soils adjacent to the wetland to accept the hydraulic loads, and the potential impact
I subsurface discharge will have with respect to stream water quality,)
2, Overburden soils are suitable for subsurface disposal.
I 3, The potable groundwater supply aquifers are protected by overlying confining layers
at most locations, This reduces the potential of the aquifer being impacted by
I subsurface disposal.
4, In some areas, such as adjacent to County Road 93 north of County Road 22 where
I the aquifer is not fully protected by a confming layer(s), there is a higher potential for
impact on aquifer water quality by subsurface disposal of sewage,
I
March, 2005 28
I
I *Trow
DRAFT
I
Cralghurst Secondary Plan - Master Servicing Report
BAlF0013761A
I 5, The local soil and hydrogeological characteristic, and positioning of the study area
relative to local wetlands and agricultural land, present favourable conditions for the
I application of any number of communal treatment systems,
6, Individual on-site sewage systems cannot support concentrated residential,
I hospitality, commercial and industrial development that produces large volumes, or
high strength of sewage. The density of development such as that which exists at the
intersection of County Roads 22 and 93 cannot be supported by on-site sewage
I systems constructed to current standards.
Sewage Disposal to Surface
I a) If sewage lagoons are used for primary or secondary treatment, there are
positioning constraints. Prevailing winds are from the northwest and southwest
I depending on the time of year. This increases the setbacks required for siting
such a facility west or northwest of the Study Area,
I b) Adjacent agricultural lands are suitable locations for disposing effluent by spray
irrigation, or snowfluent. Snowfluent performance is subject to certain climatic
conditions being met.
I c) Adjacent wetlands present an opportunity for tertiary treatment.
I d) The receiving stream (Matheson Creek) is considered a cold water fishery.
e) Downstream surface water quality allows for some assimilative capacity with
I respect to phosphorous, However, because background concentrations of
aluminum, Iron, and phenols exceed PWQO concentrations, there IS no
assimilative capacity available for these parameters.
I 4.5 Sewage Disposal Limitations
I The amount of sewage (and development density) that can be disposed of, and methods used
depends largely on the amount of degradation permitted within the medium into which effluent is
discharged.
I Subsurface Disposal - Communal System without Hydraulic Isolation
MOE Policy B-7 (Reasonable Use) is applied to measure the impact of development proposals
I supported by individual on-site subsurface sewage systems serving five or more residential units,
or large subsurface sewage disposal systems that discharge more than 10,000 Ud effluent. The
Policy is applied where it cannot be demonstrated that the effluent plume is hydraulically
I isolated from sources of groundwater supply.
Nitrate (N), which is converted from ammonia (N) found in domestic sewage, is used to measure
I groundwater impact potential.
March, 2005 29
I
I *Trow
DRAFT
I
Cralghurst Secondary Plan - Master Servicing Report BAlF0013761A
I The Reasonable Use calculation for nitrate, taking into consideration a natural background
nitrate concentration of 0.4 mg/L, is as follows:
I Cm = Cb + x(Cr - Cb), where
Cb = natural background concentration in upper sand aquifer (see Table 7)
I Cr - Ontario Drinking Water Objective = 10.0 mg/L-N
x = ratio for health parameters to ensure negligible effect on groundwater use = 0.25
I Cm = maximum acceptable concentration beneath adjacent property
Cm = 0.4 mg/L + 0.25(10mg/L - 0.4 mg/L) = 2.8 mgIL
I The concentration of nitrate in groundwater that can be permitted at the down gradient property
boundary is:
I ,Cw = Cm - Cb = 2,8 mg/L - 0.4 mg/L = 2.4 mg/L (N)
Guidelines suggest using a nitrate (N) concentration in septic tank effluent of 40 mg/L-N, and an
I average daily flow rate of 1,000 Llday, when evaluating the impact on groundwater by sewage
produced by a single family dwelling,
I When nitrate attenuation is assessed, only that which occurs by dilution is considered, The
amount of water available for dilution is equal to the annual infiltration rate of 250 mm (see
Section 3.4.5).
I In applying Policy B- 7, the density of development permitted on subsurface sewage disposal
(without regard to hydraulic performance capabilities) is estimated as follows:
I Cw = effluent concentration
available dilution
I or, Cw = C.(#units)(l000Lld/unit)(365d1vr)
(250rrun/yr/ha + units(l 000Lldlunit)(365d1yr))
I which is simplified to,
I Cw - concentration of nitrate permitted = 2.4 mg/L
Ce = concentration of nitrate in effluent
(varies depending on level of treatment)
I Table 12 below establishes the density of development (residential units per hectare at 3
persons/unit) assuming a municipal sewage system with subsurface disposal, and the effluent
I plume not isolated from a groundwater supply aquifer,
I
March, 2005 30
I
I *Trow
DRAFT
I
Cralghurst Secondary Plan - Master Servicing Report BAlF0013761A
I Table 5
Development Density
I Subsurface Sewage Disposal
Municipal Facility with Potential Groundwater Impact
I Nitrate Concentration # Units/ha of
Treatment System % Nitrate Reduction in Emuent Catchment Area
Convention Septic Tank 0% 40ml!!L 004(1)
I Peat Filter Beds 50% 20 mg/L 0,9\')
Rccirculation Sand Filters 25% 30 mI!!L 0,6(1)
RBC/SBRlAerobic Plant
with Denitrification 90% 4-5 mgIL 6.3(1)
I RBC - Rotary Biological Contactor
SBR - Sequentiat Batch Reactor
(I) The total number of units will also be a function of the total area available for attenuation by dilution (catchment
I area), The land area dedicated for attenuation could conceivably include the settlement area of Craighurst, and
areas outside the designated settlement area,
I As seen, the number of units permitted per hectare varies with the level of treatment provided,
If only the Secondary Plan Study Area is used in the dilution calculation, then a conventional
I RBC/SBR/ Aerobic Plant with denitrification to subsurface disposal could support a population
of up to 780 units, or 2,340 people,
I Nitrex filters have achieved continuous effluent concentrations of 3 mg/L over extended periods
which would result in 27.4 units/ha development which would exceed the 11 units/ha proposed
for the Secondary Plan. Biological membranes with denitiftication reportedly reduce anunonia
I and resulting nitrates to 2 mg/L which would meet Reasonable Use Criteria to also allow full
development ofthe Secondary Plan,
Subsurface Disposal- Communal System with Hydraulic Isolation
I In the case that the demonstrated effluent plume is hydraulically isolated ftom potential supply
aquifers, then Policy B-7 is satisfied, This situation typically occurs where there is a hydraulic
I boundary to groundwater flow immediately dOWllgradient of the location of subsurface sewage
disposal. The background information collected to date suggests the wetlands west and north of
the Study Area present a hydraulic boundary to groundwater flow, Further, there is an upward
I hydraulic gradient in the direction of groundwater flow adjacent to the wetlands. It may be
possible to demonstrate that the effluent plume discharge from a communal sewage system
utilizing subsurface disposal is hydraulically isolated ftom groundwater supply aquifers if the
I distribution area is located on Concession 1 WPR somewhere between Lots 41 and 46, or on Lot
44, Concession 1 EPR.
I Should this situation exist, then the discharge of sewage via the subsurface will occur to the
adjacent wetlands and eventually to Matheson Creek.
I Tertiary treatment of effluent would occur naturally by:
March, 2005 31
I
I *Trow
DRAFT
I
Cralghurst Secondary Plan - Master Servicing Report BAlF0013761A
I 1) Filtering effluent through the overburden soils.
2) Uptake by wetland vegetation at the point of effluent discharge to surface,
I Under the Water Resources Act, the Ministry of Environment applies Policies 1 and 2 of the
Provincial Water Quality Objectives as they relate to surface water quality degradation resulting
I uom the discharge of effluent. It must be demonstrated through an analysis of the assimilative
capacity of the receiving watercourse, that these policies are met. (Policy 1 states that where
upstream surface water quality is below the PWQO concentration, water quality cannot be
I degraded to worse than the PWQO concentration at the downstream compliance limit. Policy 2
states that where upstream surface water quality is equal to or above the PWQO concentration, it
cannot be degraded further at the downstream compliance limit.)
I In the case of surface water discharge (whether directly or via subsurface flow), phosphorous
replaces nitrate as the parameter of concern within sewage effluent. The PWQO for total
I phosphorous is 0.03 mg/L. For impact assessment, a concentration of 15 mg/L (P) phosphorous
in sewage effluent is used. Phosphorous attenuation occurs naturally in the soil, and by dilution,
Sewage treatment systems are also capable of reducing the concentration of phosphorous.
I The natural retention capacity of the native soil media beneath the subsurface distribution
system, and between the distribution system and the point of discharge to the surface must be
I measured to determine the attenuation capacity of the soil.
In all likelihood, the size of development which could be supported by a communal sewage
I system utilizing subsurface disposal located in the hydrologic setting described will be dictated
by the hydraulic capabilities of the overburden that must accept sewage flows rather than
phosphorous attenuation,
I Surface Water Discharge
The capacity of Matheson Creek, or Craig's Swamp, to receive sewage can be established by
I applying PWQO Policy 1 with respect to total phosphorous.
PWQO Policy 1 permits degradation in surface water quality with respect to phosphorous to 0.03
I mg/L. The background concentration of total phosphorous in Matheson Creek at Craig's Swamp
was measured in April, 2000 to be less than the laboratory detection limit of 0,01 mg/L.
Therefore, an increase in phosphorous concentration of 0.02 mg/L would satisfy PWQO Policy.
I Using a stream flow of 150 Lis (approximate springtime flow of Matheson Creek at Highway
400), and an allowable phosphorous concentration of 0,02 mg/L, the equivalent daily allowable
I loading of phosphorous would be 259,200 mg/d,
Assuming a source concentration of 15 mg/L (P) and a daily flow of 1,000 L per dwelling, or a
I daily loading of 15,000 mg/d (P) per dwelling, the number of units that could be supported with
0% phosphorous reduction is 17. A treatment facility capable of providing 90% reduction in
total phosphorous, and a receiving stream flow of 150 Lis, would support approximately 173
I
March, 2005 32
I
I *Trow
DRAFT
I
Craighurst Secondary Plan - Master Servicing Report BAlFOO13761A
I single family residential units, A biological membrane plant with 98% removal to 0.3 mg/L
phosphorous results in 864 residential units served.
I A detailed assimilative capacity study must be completed to evaluate receiving stream water
quality. A flow rate analysis and seasonal fluctuations in phosphorous concentrations in the
I stream must be assessed in order to evaluate this option,
The MOE has identified that an assimilative study for the Nottawasaga Watershed is underway
which will defme downstream limitations, Unfortunately, the MOE have stated that they are
I reluctant to approve any sewage facilities until the assimilative study is complete,
I 4.6 Treatment Plant Location
Since it is proposed to phase development to accommodate growth of 75 units per year, more
I than one treatment facility and plant expansion phasing are considered, The option of
constructing more than one treatment plant increases costs significantly, A more economical
option, due to economy of scale, is the design of a plant that can be expanded,
I Consequently, we do not recommend more than one municipal wastewater treatment facility,
However, the Class Environmental Assessment for the new Sewage Treatment Plant will review
I this option as a potential solution again,
The preferred location of a future wastewater treatment facility is recommended at the northeast
I comer of Lot 41, Concession 1 west of the CPR railway, This location illustrated on Figure 4,1
is selected for the following reasons:
I . The Plant is downstream of, but close proximity to, the gravity collection system for the
Secondary Plan;
I . The Plant is midway between the north and south limits of the Secondary Plan to reduce
trunk sewer lengths, depths and diameters;
I . The Plant abuts, but is above flood levels of Copeland wetland, The wetland is non-
agriculture and non-developable, provides a natural buffer and is available for wastewater
discharge if discharge to the wetland is selected in the Class Environmental Assessment
I process;
The Plant abuts the railway as a visible barrier and as a non-residential buffer, and is in a
.
I non-developed agricultural location outside the Secondary Plan, As such, the Plant is
expandable;
I . The Plant is located such that property acquisition /Tom Lot 41 or Lot 42 owners will
ensure a competitive price;
I
March, 2005 33
I
I *Trow
DRAFT
I
Cralghurst Secondary Plan - Master Servicing Report BAlF0013761A
I single family residential units. A biological membrane plant with 98% removal to 0,3 mg/L
phosphorous results in 864 residential units served.
I A detailed assimilative capacity study must be completed to evaluate receiving stream water
quality, A flow rate analysis and seasonal fluctuations in phosphorous concentrations in the
I stream must be assessed in order to evaluate this option,
The MOE has identified that an assimilative study for the Nottawasaga Watershed is underway
which will defme downstream limitations. Unfortunately, the MOE have stated that they are
I reluctant to approve any sewage facilities until the assimilative study is complete,
I 4.6 Treatment Plant Location
Since it is proposed to phase development to accommodate growth of 75 units per year, more
I than one treatment facility and plant expansion phasing are considered. The option of
constructing more than one treatment plant increases costs significantly, A more economical
option, due to economy of scale, is the design of a plant that can be expanded,
I Consequently, we do not recommend more than one municipal wastewater treatment facility,
However, the Class Environmental Assessment for the new Sewage Treatment Plant will review
I this option as a potential solution again,
The preferred location of a future wastewater treatment facility is recommended at the northeast
I comer of Lot 41, Concession 1 west of the CPR railway, This location illustrated on Figure 4.1
is selected for the following reasons:
I . The Plant is downstream of, but close proximity to, the gravity collection system for the
Secondary Plan;
I . The Plant is midway between the north and south limits of the Secondary Plan to reduce
trunk sewer lengths, depths and diameters;
I . The Plant abuts, but is above flood levels of Copeland wetland, The wetland is non-
agriculture and non-developable, provides a natural buffer and is available for wastewater
discharge if discharge to the wetland is selected in the Class Environmental Assessment
I process;
The Plant abuts the railway as a visible barrier and as a non-residential buffer, and is in a
.
I non-developed agricultural location outside the Secondary Plan. As such, the Plant is
expandable;
I . The Plant is located such that property acquisition ITom Lot 41 or Lot 42 owners will
ensure a competitive price;
I
March, 2005 33
r
I *Trow
DRAFT
I
Cralghurst Secondary Plan - Master Servicing Report BAiF0013761A
I . The Plant is located such that infiltration disposal options can be provided by either Lot
41 or Lot 42, or both;
I . The Plant is located outside the Secondary Plan where development is proposed, so trunk
sewers and forcemain parallel to the CPR railway, (as a Utility corridor), will not
I interfere with multiple residential properties. Power supply, telecommunications, gas and
utilities can be provided along a utility corridor from County Rd 22;
I . The Plant location is midway between two streams that may provide the option of surface
water discharge to one or both depending on the Class Environmental Assessment.
Gravity or pumped discharge is possible; and,
I . The site is accessible from County Rd 22 and is in close proximity to Highway 400.
Truck traffic for deliveries and sludge disposal do not need to travel through the
I Secondary Plan development.
4.7 Costs'
I Sewage treatment costs depend on the level of treatment based on discharge criteria to meet the
outcome of the Nottawasaga River Watershed assimilative capacity study. However, it is highly
I unlikely that high levels of treatment by central municipal treatment plants will be restricted
from the watershed. Servicing for the Secondary Plan is based on high levels of treatment
through several disposal options, The fmal requirements will be determined through the Class
I Environmental Assessment.
Therefore, we based our costs on a central municipal treatment plant, assuming biological
I treatment with denitrification for 1,185 m3/d average flow and subsurface disposal.
Sewage treatment $4,300,000 - $4,620/unit (equivalent)
I Gravity sewer collection - $2,900/unit (equivalent)
I
I
I
I
I
March, 2005 34
r
~,
I *Trow
DRAFT
I
Cralghurst Secondary Plan - Master Servicing Report BAlF0013761A
I 5.0 Stormwater Management
I The Craighurst Secondary Planning Area is 160 hectares in area situated within the Simcoe
Uplands on the extreme northwest flank of the Bass Lake or Oro Moraine sand moraine, The
I area drains to Matheson Creek which is tributary to Willow Creek and the Nottawasaga River.
The upper section of Matheson Creek is also part of the Copeland-Craighurst wetland complex,
I Matheson Creek provides cold and cool water fishery, which impacts the degree of treatment
required for any stormwater undertaking. Within the Planning Area, the Nottawasaga Valley
Conservation Authority has requested a 30 meter development setback from the centerline of
I identified natural streams. I
This section provides the technical and engineering stormwater management information for
I future development. It includes the hydrologic models for existing conditions, and stormwater
management facility locations, sizing, design criteria and cost estimates,
I 5.1 Existing Conditions
I 5,1.1 Drainage Basins
Drainage basin catchment areas are identified on Figure 5.1, and drainage structures are shown
I oriDrawing SWM-1. There are five major gullies, or small watershed drainage basins, that drain
from the northwest flank of the moraine through the study area to Matheson Creek. The
construction of County Road 22 (Horseshoe Valley Road) has diverted catchment area Basin 2 to
I Basin 1. The diverted and remnant portions of Basin 2 result in six drainage basins altogether.
Table 5.1 provides a summary of each drainage basin.
I
I
I
I
I
I
March, 2005 35
r
I *Trow
DRAFT
I
Cralghurst Secondary Plan - Master Servicing Report BAlF0013761A
I Table 5.1
Craighurst Drainage Basins
I Hydraulic Laud Treatmeut
Draiuage Area Elev. Drop Leugth Wooded Field Settled
I Basin (ha) (m) (m) (%) (%) (ha) (%)
I 49 46 1,700 5 95
2 157 103 3,300 25 75 20 13
I 3 59 29 1,400 50 50 16 27
4 59 32 1,800 70 30 II 19
I 5 331 126 4,800 60 40 40 12
6 226 129 4,700 70 30
I The density of development in "settled areas" is relatively low outside the central commercial
area located at the crossroads in Craighurst. Typical existing lot sizes in residential areas range
I between 0,2 and 1.5 hectares (0.5 and 4.0 acres).
The following is a description of each drainage basin:
I Basin 1 drains to the extreme southwest comer of the planning area. There is no defined
watercourse, However, there is a 0,6 meter diameter concrete culvert to convey any overland
I flow which may occur from this basin through the CPR embankment.
Basin 2 lies south of County Road 22, Topographic mapping shows the watercourse crossing
I County Road 22 at the CPR crossing; however, the 1.8 x 0.9 meter concrete box culvert passes
through the railroad embankment only, Flow from this basin is directed towards the Highway
400 cloverleaf south of County Road 22 where it joins the outfall from Basin 1. This drainage
I route flows intermittently.
Basin 3 was once part of Basin 2 before County Road 22 was constructed, Basin 3 commences
I at the Foodland grocery store and drains the south portion of the new Craighurst Estates
Subdivision to a 0,6 meter diameter concrete pipe culvert passing under the railway
embankment. There is no defmed watercourse downstream of the CPR.
I Basin 4 is a small intermediate drainage area that coincides with a pronounced gully that
commences immediately to the northeast of the intersection at County Roads 22 and 93, There is
I a small storm sewer system that drains the intersection. The storm sewer outlets to the Basin 4
gully where County Road 93 crosses it south of the intersection. Overland flow at the base of the
gully occurs briefly after a runoff event. The 0.9 meter diameter culvert under County Road 93
I is half filled with silt. Some minor erosion is evident at the road embankment.
A 0,9 x 1.2 meter concrete box culvert under the CPR embankment accepts surface drainage
I from this basin, Base flow does not occur in Basin 4 until just upstream of Highway 400,
March. 2005 36
r
I *Trow
DRAFT
I
Cralghurst Secondary Plan - Master Servicing Report BAlF0013761A
I Basin 5 encompasses the northerly section of the study area. Base flow is evident at County
Road 22 where there is a 1.2 meter diameter CSP. The stream channel at this location is 0.3
I meters wide by 0.15 meters deep and flows southeast to northwest through the study area. The
stream crosses County Road 93 through a 0.9 meter CSP culvert and then passes through a 1.5 x
1.8 meter concrete arch culvert at the CPR embankment. The stream channel approaching the
I CPR culvert is 0.3 meters wide and 0.4 meters deep,
There is a sub-basin within Basin 5 that is approximately 26 hectares in size. It has no defmed
I channel and drains to a 1.2 x 0,8 meter concrete box culvert that passes under the CPR, then to a
0.9 meter diameter steel culvert that passes under County Road 93. Surface drainage nom this
sub-basin joins drainage from the balance of Basin 5 within the swamp lying west of the Study
I Area,
Table 5.2 gives an indication of stream flow rates within the brook that drains Basin 5,
(The
I decrease in measured stream flows between upstream and downstream locations of 3 Lis is
attributed to the accuracy of the velocity meter and flow cross section area measurements.)
I Table 5.2
Basin 5 Stream Flow
I Location
Date Connty Rd. 22 CPR
I Aprit 24, 2000 (I) 15Us 12Us
(l) 25 to 30 mm rainfall three days prior
I Basin 6 is located in the northerly limit of the study area. There is no evidence of a riparian
channel at County Road 22. However, at the CPR 1.2 x 1.5 meter concrete arch culvert the
I stream channel is 0,3 meters wide and 0,2 meters deep, A stream flow of 20 Lis was measured at
the CPR culvert on April 24, 2000. There is a High Water mark on the culvert headwall that
coincides with the top of the culvert opening, Basin 6 outlets to Craig's Swamp,
I 5.1.2 Stormwater Management Facilities
I There are two stormwater management facilities in Basin 3, One is located in the northwest
comer of the Foodland store parking lot. The other is located in the southwest comer of the
Craighurst Estates Subdivision, Both stonnwater management ponds offer pre/post-development
I storm drainage control as well as an opportunity for surface runoff to infiltrate into the ground,
5.1.3 Soils
I The Simcoe County Soil Survey shows the surface soils surrounding Craighurst to be Tioga sand
loam and Tioga sand-Vasey sand loam at elevations higher than contour 250 mas\. Below
I contour 250 masl, the soils are either Alliston sandy loam, or muck. Muck soils are found in the
March, 2005 37
r
I *Trow
DRAFT
I
Cralghurst Secondary Plan - Master Servicing Report BAlF0013761A
I lower swamp areas adjacent to Highway 400 west and north of Craighurst. The Alliston soils are
located at marginally higher elevations found adjacent to the low swamp lands.
I Tioga and Vasey soils are well draining with high infiltration characteristics, and belong in soil
hydrologic groups A and AB, respectively. Alliston sandy loam soils are fine sands with
I imperfect drainage and a similar hydrologic group classification of AB. Muck soils are typically
located in areas where organic material has collected and drainage is poor,
I 5.2 Guidelines
The stormwater management plan for the Secondary Planning Area shall be completed in
I accordance with the most current provincial, municipal and the Nottawasaga Valley
Conservation Authority guidelines. The guidelines shall include, but are not limited to, the
following:
I Water Quantity
I Post-development peak flow rates attenuated to pre-development levels, or less, for all storms
up to and including the 100 year rainfall event.
I Water Quality
Levell treatment is required due to:
I . The Planning Area located in Oro Moraine, a very important recharge area and
headwater of Matheson Creek;
J . Downstream coldwater fisheries
I A minimum of 30 meters setback is required on either side of a natural stream or
watercourse,
I 5.3 Best Management Practice
To increase infiltration, reduce post-development peak flow and erosion, and enhance water
I quality, the following best management practice approaches should apply to the Secondary
Planning area:
r Source and Conveyance Controls
. Infiltration is to be promoted where sufficient pre-treatment of stormwater runoff can be
I achieved. For example, roof leaders should discharge to pervious grassed areas or soak
away pits, No direct connection of roof leaders to the storm sewer system shall be
I permitted.
March, 2005 38
I
I *Trow
DRAFT
I
Cralghurst Secondary Plan - Master Servicing Report BAlF0013761A
I . Grassed swales in place of curb and gutter along road within depressions.
. Reduced lot grading to minimize runoff and allow stormwater ponding for natural
I infiltration.
I . Sump pumping of foundation drains to rear yard ponding areas.
Utilize vegetated buffer strips where practical especially alongside roadways in the
.
I vicinity of stream crossings to protect the watercourse.
Storm sewers where required off paved roadways should be geotextile wrapped
.
I perforated pipe with granular backfill.
To encourage infiltration of stormwater as per Best Management Practices; curb, gutter
.
I and storm sewer use should be minimized. End of Pipe Controls
Wet extended detention ponds with infiltration basins for frequent runoff events (ie. <5 yr
.
I storm)
Detention storage ponds for infrequent rainfall events (2 - 100 years storm prelpost
.
I control)
5.4 Pre Development
I SWMHYMO, a computer stormwater management hydrologic model, was utilized to compute
the peak runoff flows for the six existing drainage basin areas, The SWMHYMO input and
t output file can be reviewed in Appendix "A",
Table 5.3 provides a summary of the 2, 5, 25, and 100 year SCS 24 hour design storm and
I Regional Storm (Timmins Storm) event peak flows.
t
I
I
I
I
March, 2005 39
r
I *Trow
DRAFT
I
Craighurst Secondary Plan - Master Servicing Report BAlF0013761A
I Table 5.3
Pre-Development Peak Flows (m3/s)
I Storm Event Basin 1 Basin 2 Basin 3 Basin 4 Basin 5 Basin 6
I 2 yr, SCS 0,04 0,03 0.77 0.67 0,03 0.03
5 yr, SCS 0,34 0,26 1.19 1.05 0.24 0.16
25 yr. SCS 1.45 1.06 1.68 1.44 0,92 0,63
I 100 yr, SCS 2,95 2.15 2,26 1.92 1.86 1.30
Timmins 9.60 7,25 2,96 2,63 9.21 6,63
I 5.5 Post Development
I Post development peak flows for the Planning Area should be controlled to the pre-development
levels or less for all storms upto and including the 100 year rainfall event. Post development
I peak flows are to be modeled in detail at the functional servicing plan stages, or when the
development density is clearly identified,
I 5.6 Stormwater Management Ponds
The preferred location of stormwater management ponds, and corresponding catchment areas,
I within the Secondary Planning Area are shown on Drawing SWM-l.
Pond sites were selected based on the following criteria:
I . Locations that would facilitate inter-basin drainage where feasible,
. Upstream of existing drainage culverts crossing Hwy 93 and the CPR thus
I avoiding expensive culvert enlargements.
. At the most downstream location within the Secondary Plan Area,
I
. Locations that also capture drainage from existing lots in addition to new
I development.
Each pond shall provide "enhanced" or Level 1 quality protection per Table 3.2 of the
I "Stormwater Management Planning and Design Manual" (MOE, 2003), Permanent pool storage
volumes are to be based on impervious ratio and drainage area,
Table 5.4 summarizes the storage volumes for each drainage basin pond, The volumes are
I preliminary, actual volumes should be obtained through detailed hydrologic model undertaken at
the functional servicing plan, or detailed design stages,
I
March, 2005 40
I
I *Trow
DRAFT
I
Cralghurst Secondary Plan - Master Servicing Report BAlF0013761A
I Table 5.4
Stormwater Pond/Basin Storage Volumes
I Development
Area Drainage Percent % Runoff Active Total
I PondlBasin Area Impervious Coefficient Permanent Pool Storage (I) Volume
(ha) (m'/ha) (m') (m') lm')
A 9.54 60 0,6 162 1545 5500 7045
I B 15,84 45 0.4 125 1980 6100 8080
C 24.71 45 0.4 125 3090 9500 12590
I F 25.00 45 0.4 125 3125 9700 12825
G 42,92 45 0.4 125 5365 16600 21965
H 3,18 45 0.4 27.5 90 1200 1290
I
(1) Active storage volumes are calculated based on Orinia IDF Bes 100 year stonn event having a 24 hour rainfall volume of 120.68 mm, and
I that the volume of runoff retained in active storage is 80% of total 100 year storm rainfall.
The active storages shall include extended detention storage for erosion control, and quantity
I control storage for each design storm (2 to 100 year).
An infiltration basin or dry pond shall serve the drainage area "H", because the area shall be too
small to sustain a wet pond, NVCA "Wet Pond Criteria Check" indicates that a minimum
I drainage area offive hectares is required for a wet pond.
The two existing ponds should continue to serve the drainage area "D".
I There shall be no new development in area "E"; consequently, no new pond shall be required.
On-site controls are being used for the existing development in this area.
I Another option for area "A" and "B" is that combining Pond A and Pond B together to make a
bigger pond in area "A", In this case, the existing culvert shall be upgraded to meet the new
I capacity,
I
5.7 SWMF Design Criteria
I Based on NVCA "Wet Pond Criteria Check", stormwater management pond design standards
should include:
I . Sediment Forebay:
I - Minimum length to width ratio of2: 1 if single inlet,
March,2005 41
I
I *Trow
DRAFT
I
Cralghurst Secondary Plan - Master Servicing Report BAlF0013761A
I - Minimum depth of 1.0 meter,
- Minimum area of 1/3 total pond surface area;
I . Wet Pond:
I - Minimum length to width ratio of3:1, 4:1 to 5:1 preferred
- Maximum side slope of3:1;
I . Permanent Pool:
I - Average depth of 1 to 2 meters,
- Maximum depth ofless than 3 meters,
I - Maximum grade of 5: 1, 7: 1 preferred;
. Storage Depth
I - <1.5 m for quality/erosion control, :5:1,0 m preferred
- <2.0 meters for active storage;
i . Major Flow Outlet
I - Regulatory Storm (Tinunins Storm) capacity;
- Erosion protection for all design storms;
I - 0.3 meter minimum freeboard;
. Maintenance access should be provided; and,
I . A 30 meters setback from centerline ofthe watercourse should be maintained.
I 5.8 Erosion and Sediment Control During Construction
In order to prevent the migration of silt downstream, it is important that sediment and erosion
I control strategy plans be prepared prior to constructions. The following are some of sediment
and erosion measures which should be considered for implementation:
I . Provide detailed construction work plan and staging schedule
Install site access pad
.
I . Construct rock check dams
I . Divert runoff from exposed areas
March, 2005 42
f
I *Trow
DRAFT
I
Craighurst Secondary Plan - Master Servicing Report BAlF0013761 A
I . Construct silt fencing
I . Stabilize exposed areas with topsoil and seed immediately after construction
. Regularly inspect erosion and sediment control and restore works where required
I . Based on NVCA Technical Standards for Stormwater Management, during the grading
and construction phases, temporary stormwater sediment ponds or traps must be
I constructed, maintained and operated throughout the construction period. Temporary
stormwater sediment ponds should be sized to detain the runoff from a 25 year 6 hour
duration rainfall event by using average intensity, with a permanent pool of 0.6 meter in
I depth, All other temporary sediment control techniques should be desigued to withstand
the runoff from a 25 year 6 hour duration rainfall event by using peak intensity.3
I 5.9 Stormwater Drainage Works Cost Estimates
Costs for Stormwater Management Facilities, curb, gutter, sewers, manholes, catchbasins, inlets
I and outlets are greater than the Best Management Practice alternative to construct infiltration
swales, ditches and perforated storm pipes, However construction at the central County Roads 22
and 93 intersection, and road approaches, will require curb, gutters and storm sewers to
I accommodate property limitations, sidewalks, etc.
Table 5.5 sununarizes the preliminary costs for the stormwater management ponds and
I infiltration basin,
I Table 5.5
Stormwater Drainage Works Cost Estimates
I Item Area (ha.) Volume (m3) Cost
Pond A 0.47 7,045 $185,000
I Pond B 0.52 8,080 $200,000
Pond C 0.77 12,590 $275,000
Pond F 0.79 12,825 $280,000
I Pond G 1.29 21,965 $405,000
Infiltration Basin H 0.26 1,290 $ 130,000
I Total $1,475,000
I Stormwater Management Facilities $20601 equivalent units (717 serviced)
Drainage Works and Ditches $1,200/equivalent unit
I
March, 2005 43
r
I *Trow
DRAFT
I
Craighurst Secondary Pian - Master Servicing Report BAlF0013761 A
I 6.0 Transportation
I 6.1 Road Definitions
I Definitions
I The following describes road and street classification and function,
Freeways are controlled access highways providing vehicles traveling at high speeds over
relatively long distances.
I Arterial roads are through routes providing transportation across, and within, populated centers.
Access to property is permitted; however, traffic flow is affected by the number of access points.
I Typica~ly, development of property adjacent to arterial routes is undertaken to minimize the
impact on traffic flow, Shared access points and controlled direction of access is encouraged.
I Major Collectors convey traffic between arterial roads and local roads, and may be used to
service property.
I Minor Collectors provide access and traffic movement between major collectors and arterials, In
residential areas, minor collectors convey traffic to and from a neighborhood prior to intersecting
I with streets having a higher classification, Through traffic is not encouraged,
Local Streets provide access only to each abutting property,
I Boundary Roads present the directional limits of travel perpendicular to their orientation, and can
function as anyone of the above,
I 6.2 Existing Conditions
I The major road network is shown on Figure 6.1, and described as follows,
Highway 400 is a controlled access freeway, It provides a major route of vehicular transport
I between Toronto - Barrie - Parry Sound - Sudbury and areas beyond,
Simcoe County Road 93 (Penetanguishene Road) was formerly King's Highway 93. It provides
a connecting route between the City of Barrie and Penetanguishene/Midland. It runs parallel to
I Highway 400 south of Craighurst to Barrie and crosses Highway 400 two kilometers north of the
study area, Since it runs parallel to Highway 400, County Road 93 acts as a service road to
I provide an altemate route when Highway 400 traffic is diverted or congested, and functions as a
major collector road between interchanges.
I
March,2005 44
I
I
I ~ \{J
d
1
I ~,
"'1
\
I ~ \\
,
\.....,. \
I "
I
I
,
I J
I LA
I SNCOE
I \
\
I , -;;/
"g"'~ "
~....
I ,"/ \/.-.-/ ~
",':;.
',.,.~' .
( ",' ~", C,
" ..." '4'.'
\\ ( i ,.............
~,.
I . '
" V '
! '. .;' " >\\\('.~I'.
~ "
I LEGEND
MUNIC\P.Il./TOWHSIfIP BOUNDARY
KING'S HIGHWAY _. -"-
COUNTY IIOAO - PRIMARY ARTERIAL - 20m II.O.W. -
I COUNTY ROAn - I'fUIdARY ARTERIAL - 'MOniED 26-30m -
WUiiHRCAiJ _ S;::CCI'\>"'~'i Aii,tiilAl (LCCALj'lJRBAf{ n:r'H) - re,,,. 1':.0.'#.
COUNTY ROAD - SECONOARY ARTERIAL (tOCAljURBAN EXT'N) - WIDENED 25-JOm =-=
"PROPOSEOu BRADFORO B'I'-PASS ROtJtE dnu~~u~<
I Trow Associates Inc.
*'Trow
561 BRYNE DRIVE, UNIT D Tel: (705) 734-6222
I BARRIE, ONTARIO L4N 9Y3 Fax: (705) 734-6224
SCALE NTS CUENT: JOB NO,
OATE: MAR 2005 TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE BAIF0013761 A
I . TIllE:
ORAWN: LLC Arterial Road Systems FIG 6.1
I *Trow
DRAFT
I
Cralghurst Secondary Plan - Master Servicing Report BAlF0013161A
I The County of Simcoe's Official Plan has classified County Road 93 as a primary arterial road.
It has a 30,5 meter Right-of-Way (ROW) throughout most of its length within and beyond the
I study area. There is a 150 meter section of ROW immediately n north of County Road 22 that is
only 20.0 meters wide. Through the hamlet there is a pedestrian sidewalk on the west side and
east side of the ROW north and south of County Road 22, respectively.
I Simcoe County Road 22 (Horseshoe Valley Road) is an east-west connecting route that extends
from King's Highway 12 just north ofOrillia to King's Highway 26. Through the centre of the
I hamlet, County Road 22 has a 20.0 meter ROW width and is classified as a secondary arterial
road, East and west of the hamlet, it has a 30.5 meter ROW, and is classified as a primary
arterial road by the Official Plan for Simcoe County.
I The intersection of County Rd 93 and County Rd 22 is a signalized two lane intersection, with
left turn lanes for each approach to the intersection. Pedestrian signals are in place but currently
I advance green signal phasing is not implemented.
The speed limit through the intersection is posted at 60 km/h,
I The intersection and approaches are relatively flat and at right angles with good straight lines for
both stopping and turning, A slight vertical grade up to the intersection for southbound traffic
I does not restrict visibility,
Commercial development and some residential development access the intersection within the
I length of the left turn lanes interfering with both sight line visibility and intersection traffic
during peak periods.
I Overall, both the intersection at County Rd 93 and 22, and the intersection approaches, are
currently operating at a high level of service.
I 6.3 Existing Traffic
The two traffic patterns normally assessed are:
I . the Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) on roads, and
I . the Peak Hour, vehicles per hour (VPH) at intersections,
Traffic analysis is based on traffic counts which are taken over 10 hours on a particular day.
I This information is used to forecast both Peak Hour and AADT traffic patterns and volumes. The
forecasts are used for 10 year and 20 year design periods. These forecasts need continual
verification, However, traffic counts undertaken periodically for studies and regularly by most
I municipalities and the County of Simcoe can produce a good approximation of traffic
parameters,
I
I Marchi 2005 46
I DRAFT *Trow
I
Cralghurst Secondary Plan - Master Servicing Report BAlF0013761A
I A review of traffic information was undertaken during the Background Study in 2000,
Additional traffic counts were undertaken by the County since that time at the intersection and in
2002 and 2003 on County Roads 22 and 93, respectively, reflecting conditions at that time,
I 6.3.1 Annual Average Daily Traffic
I Traffic capacity improvements for two lane arterial roads should be considered when traffic
volumes approach 20,000 AADT vehicles per day. Recent traffic volumes approaching the
I intersection are about 5600 AADT in 2002 on County Rd 22 and about 2400 AADT in 2003 on
County Rd 93, A summary of Simcoe County information follows:
I Table 6.1 - Simcoe County Traffic AADT
I Coun(, Rd 22
AADT
I AADT AADT County Rd 93
at County Rd
Year Hwy 400 at Hwv 93 22
I 1995 2500 3350
..
I 1996 2500 3400
1998 3800 4900
I 1999 4300 4800 2450
I 2000 2400
2002 4900 5600
I 2003 2400
2004
I 6.3,2 Peak Hour Traffic
I Traffic patterns change during different times of day, Peak hour traffic, morning, midday and
afternoon is analyzed to assess the most significant peaks for road and intersection requirements,
I Simcoe County provided data on traffic movements through the intersection based on traffic
counts done on May 26 1998 and July 5, 2001. Among other things, the traffic counts identify
the turning movements and traffic volumes for the four legs of the intersection.
I
March, 2005 47
I
I DRAFT *Trow
I
Cralghurst Secondary Plan - Master Servicing Report BAlf0013761 A
I The existing 1998 and 2001 PM Peak Hour traffic volumes are as follows:
Table 6.2
I Existing PM Peak Hour Traffic
County Road 22 and 93 Intersection
I July 5 2001
Mav 1998 PM Peak PM Peak
VPH
I VPH % ole %
County Road 93
Total North of County Rd 22 253 18 16.8 17.6
I Northbound 145 10.3 9.4 9.8
Southbound 108 7,7 7.4 7,8
Total South of County Rd 22 264 18,8 20.3 19.7
I Northbound 155 11.11 10.3 10,8
Southbound 109 7.8 10.0 8.9
County Road 22
I Total East of Coun!v Rd 93 416 29,7 28.6 29.1
Eastbound 256 18,3 14,7 16,5
Westbound 160 11.4 13,9 12,5
I Total West ofCoulltvRd 93 467 33,3 34.3 33,6
Eastbound 190 13,6 18.4 15.9
Westbound 277 19,8 15,9 17,8
I The County of Simcoe evaluated the intersection in 1998 to determine if improvements were
required, none were justified.
I The Simcoe County data indicates the ratio of truck traffic is about 5% of the total volume,
I Traffic analysis of all the July 5, 2001 data identifies similar traffic patterns, but some sununer
traffic decrease over the May 1998 data. The traffic movement data comparison reveals that
basically the same overall AM and PM peak hour traffic activity occurred at the morning,
I midday and afternoon peak hours, and reflects minimal seasonal, peak hour and overall traffic
differences over the three year period. However, it should be noted that the County traffic counts
were taken off season, with respect to traffic rrom winter skiers that travel through the
I intersection during the winter months to access Horseshoe Valley Ski Resort.
In December 1999, a Horseshoe Valley Resort Traffic Assessment identified that the winter
I weekend traffic was higher than the sununer weekday traffic, This was attributable to a major
event at Horseshoe Valley Resort that winter, Normally a reduced level of service is also
expected and should be acceptable during the opening and closing hours for the ski resorts and
I during major events. However, the total traffic difference between the major weekend event in
the winter and the sununer for the PM Peak Hour was only 170 VPH eastbound on County Rd 22
I east of County Rd 93,
March, 2005 48
I
I *Trow
DRAFT
I
Craighurst Secondary Plan - Master Servicing Report BAlF0013761A
I Tbe traffic counts during the sununer of 1999 ITom the Horseshoe Valley study were also in line
with traffic counts by the County in more recent studies for both AM and PM peak hour traffic
I volumes 93, Weekend traffic and weekday traffic counts were also similar during sununer AM
peak hour and PM peak hour traffic volumes,
I Based on the traffic studies to date, it appears that the PM peak hour consistently represents the
largest peak traffic experienced with winter weekend PM peak hour traffic potentially higher
than sununer weekend and weekday PM peak hour traffic,
I 6.4 Future Conditions
I Future traffic is based on traffic generated ITom local development and background growth ITom
regional and nearby development.
I 6.4.1 Background Traffic
Tbe future background traffic is estimated based on the existing traffic counts and the future
I growth projections for the area. A background traffic rate of growth was defmed at about 3.5 -
3.8% in the Horseshoe Valley study, A background rate of traffic growth of 3% (non
compounded) over 20 years is considered above average, but is used for conservative estimation
I purposes, Background growth of 3%/year over 20 years results in 181% of existing traffic
compounded,
I The Horseshoe Valley study identified that peak traffic due to a Horseshoe Valley Resort
expansion on Horseshoe Valley Rd east of County Rd 22, would increase ITom about 392 VPH
to 1,154 VPH sununer PM peaks (an increase of762 VPH), Higher winter PM peaks for major
I events increased ITom 718 to 1,507, a 789 VPH increase due to the nature of the winter traffic
patterns and the proposed Horseshoe Valley development. In sununary, both the sununer peak
hour increase and the winter major event traffic peak hour increased are about the same at 762-
I 789 VPH, These future Horseshoe Valley projections include the background growth of 3.5-
3,8%.
I 6,4,2 Secondary Plan Traffic
The existing residents in the Secondary Plan area contribute to existing traffic volumes, Existing
I commercial development also contributes to existing traffic volumes. Future development is
forecast to grow at 75 houses per year or about 10% per year for 10 years. Although this growth
contributes to some of the 3% background growth, it is conservatively assumed to be in addition
I to the 3% background growth,
I
I
March,2005 49
I
I *Trow
DRAFT
I
Cralghurst Secondary Plan - Master Servicing Report BAlF0013761 A
I 6.4.3 Trip Generation
I Trip generation is based on many measurements of trip generators published in the Institute of
Transportation Engineers Manual of Trip Generation, These measures are applied to similar
types of development to assess future traffic volumes.
I It is estimated that some of the commercial trips will be local trips. Consequently, these trips
will not affect the County road traffic beyond the Secondary Plan limits,
I The school trips will occur prior to the PM peak hour 5:30 - 6:30 p.m. and should be reduced by
at least 50%, School trips are expected to be coincident with AM peak hour, weekdays only.
I Trip generation ITom the Secondary Plan development was assessed for weekend and weekday
AM and PM peak hours as presented in the Appendix,
I The PM peak hour prevails as the highest peak for traffic generated ITom the Secondary Plan, as
shown'on Table 6.3,
Table 6.3 - Weekday PM Peak Hour Trip Generation
I Land Use Quantity Unit Trio Generation Rate Peak Hour Trio (vehlhr)
In Out Total In Out Total
I Connnercial 50 1,000tY 1.80 1.94 3,74 90 97 187
GFA
Residential 640 Unit 0,65 0.37 1.02 416 237 653
I Single
Residential 70 Unit 0,35 0.19 0,54 25 13 38
Multiole
Active Park 5 acres 0,21 0.38 0.59 I 2 3
I School 540 Student 0.06 0,07 0.13 32 38 70
Total 564 387 951
I To add the background traffic Horseshoe Valley Development and the Secondary Plan traffic,
distribution ofthe trips generated ITom the developments is necessary.
I 6.4.4 Trip Distribution
I Traffic counts over the years have identified a relatively consistent traffic pattern year to year
and over non-winter seasons. Consequently, it is reasonable to distribute trips generated based
I on current traffic patterns,
Trips are also distributed according to percentages and location of entrances and exits of the
I various developments to the arterial County roads, For example, the school trip distribution is to
the northeast quadrant while trips for the commercial area are distributed to County Rd 22 west
of County Rd 93 proportionately in both directions,
I Multi-residential is split as per the traffic ratios on County Roads 22 and 93,
March,2005 50
I
I *Trow
DRAFT
I
Craighurst Secondary Plan - Master Servicing Report BAlF0013761 A
I Since the PM Peak Hour has the heaviest traffic volume, it is used to analyze both historical
traffic; trip generated traffic and forecast traffic, Table 6.2 identifies existing traffic patterns by
I percent of the total traffic for each direction and each zone,
To distribute trips generated and forecast traffic zones were identified as the four legs of County
I Rd 22 and 93 intersection.
Trip distribution for the week day PM Peak Hour to the County roads as follows:
I 17.6% to and from County Rd 22 north on County Rd 93
19,7% to and from County Rd 22 south on County Rd 93
I 29.1 % to and from County Rd 93 east on County Rd 22
I 33.6% to and from County Rd 93 west on County Rd 22
Trip distribution of generated traffic is:
I 84 trips to and from County Rd 22 north on County Rd 93
I 91 trips to and from County Rd 22 south County Rd 93
218 trips to and from County Rd 93 east on County Rd 22
I 348 trips to and from County Rd 93 west on County Rd 22
I The traffic generated from the proposed Horseshoe Valley development was distributed to
Horseshoe Valley Rd east of the intersection with County Rd 93,
I 6.4.5 Traffic Yolume
The traffic pattems must be considered in the context of road capacity for two lane arterials at
I 20,000 AADT or 3,200 pc/hr,
Peak hour traffic patterns have typically remained relatively consistent over time, as seen from
I the traffic information to date.
Future traffic volumes are determined for each corridor approaching the County Rd 22 and 93
I intersection by adding the Background and Secondary Plan traffic with the forecast from the
Horseshoe Valley site traffic, The design period of 20 years is used to assess the total traffic
volume to be used to determine future road improvements,
I Future PM Peak Hour traffic on each of the four legs of the County Rd 22 and 93 intersection is
as follows:
I
March, 2005 51
I
I *Trow
DRAFT
I
Cralghurst Secondary Plan - Master Servicing Report BAlF0013761A
I Table 6.4 - Future PM Peak Hour Traffic
County Road 22 & 93 Intersection
I See
Plan Future Total
Corridor to May 2015 at 2015 Horseshoe 2015 at 2025 Level of
I and from 98 3% Add'n 2009 3% Totals Service
~ountv Road 93
Total North of 253 165 84 137 639 659 E - I lane
I County Rd 22
Total South of 264 172 91 0 527 708 D-llane
I Countv Rd 22
:::ountv Road 22
I Total East of 416 271 218 558 1463 1968 E - 2 lanes
C~untv Rd 93
I Total West of 467 305 348 421 1541 2071 E - 2 lanes
County Rd 93
I Twenty year traffic increase is highest on County Rd 22 west of County Rd 93 ITom 467 VPH to
2,071 VPH for the PM Peak Hour traffic.
I Level of Service at year 2025 for the PM Peak Hour is Level D and E, full capacity. But for
Level of Service E on County Road 22, an additional lane is required (2 lanes) for a total 4 lane
I cross-section.
I
I
I
I
I
I
March, 2005 52
I
I *Trow
DRAFT
I
Craighurst Secondary Plan - Master Servicing Report BAlF0013761A
I 6.5 Rail
I 6.5.1 Introduction
The mainline of the Canadian Pacific Rail (CPR) MacTier Subdivision runs diagonally along the
I westerly limit of the Secondary Plan Study Area, This is the CPR's main track between Toronto
and Westem Canada, Craighurst was once a train station and is still used as a maintenance depot
by Canadian Pacific Railroad.
I There is a level railway crossing on County Road 93 at the north limit of the Secondary Plan
Study Area, and on County Road 22,800 meters west of the County Road 93 and 22 intersection,
I 500 meters east of Highway 400.
During the week, CPR staff reported that as many as 16 trains pass per day, This volume is
I reduced significantly on weekends and holidays but volume fluctuates with the economy, Train
length& can range anywhere between 50 to 180 cars, CPR has no intentions of abandoning this
line.
I Future growth of the Province will undoubtedly require increased rail traffic on the CPR rail line,
Long term there may be an opportunity for passenger or freight transport as the region grows,
I However, rail services are not impacted by the proposed development of the Secondary Plan or
vice versa,
I 6.5.2 Passing Trains
Currently, delays caused by the passing of trains over County Roads 93 and 22 average about
I five minutes, These existing delays are accommodated by the storage capacity of the traffic
lanes approaching the rail crossings. As traffic increases and/or should longer trains create
longer delays, additional lanes approaching the tracks may have to be constructed for storage.
I PM Peak Hour traffic counts on July 5,2001, identified that as many as 210 VPH travel west to
the CPR railway during the Peak Hour. This requires storage for 18 vehicles during the five
I minutes it takes a train to pass during the afternoon peak hour (15: 15 16:15),
On July 5, 2001 a similar number of vehicles travel east to the CPR. The PM Peak Hour of 244
I VPH cross the rail tracks, Storage for 20 vehicles is required for the five minutes for a train to
pass during the afternoon Peak Hour, This will be infrequent.
I Storage of over 33 automobiles is available between the Highway 400 northbound off ramp to
Horseshoe Valley Rd, east to the CPR railroad. In future, as the storage of vehicles exceeds the
eastbound lane on Horseshoe Valley Road approaching the CPR railroad, an additional
I eastbound lane can be constructed between the Highway 400 northbound off ramp and the CPR
railroad, Based on current and forecast traffic eastbound on Horseshoe Valley Road this
additional lane will not be necessary until after year 2007 if trains cross during weekday PM
I Peak Hours.
March, 2005 53
I
I *Trow
DRAFT
I
Cralghurst Secondary Plan - Master Servicing Report BAlF0013761 A
I A third eastbound lane can be added in the distant future but the need is questionable based on
the information available. Additional traffic monitoring to assess the storage needed for the
second and third lane is recommended.
I North on County Road 93, 125 VPH travel towards the CP rail crossing at PM Peak Hours, Five
I minutes for a train to pass results in 11 vehicles stacking, An additional lane is not expected to
be necessary for storage,
I 6.5.3 Stopped Trains
Current delays are also caused by stopped trains. The rail siding is used for passing trains, rail
I car dropping, shunting and connecting. These delays are likely to remain the same in duration in
future, but the rrequency may increase. It is expected that future traffic will accommodate these
delays similar to the way existing traffic accommodates these delays. That is, drivers will wait
I until the delay is completed, when the train moves off the County roads, or drivers will turn
around on the County road to go back to the closest intersection and bypass the rail crossing.
Similarly, drivers observing the stationary train and traffic queue will turn away at intersections
I to alternate roads. In general, both County Road 22 and County Road 93 will not be blocked
simultaneously, Traffic can bypass the train by these alternate routes. The crossing at County
Rd 93 is a single track. South bound trains should stop before the crossing in most cases.
I Other alternate routes for turnaround traffic to bypass a stopped train are as follows:
I 1) South on County Road 93 to County Road 11, Old Barrie Road
2) North or south on Highway 400 to the nearest intersection
I As discussed earlier, longer delays due to stopped and passing trains will be similar today and in
future, The opportunity to relocate train signals prior to the road crossing may minimize
I blockage of both County Roads 93 and 22 at the same time. Negotiations with CPR to mitigate
traffic impact is ongoing. However, for these rare events when trains are stopped, additional
vehicle storage capacity is not warranted at this time,
I 6.6 Road Requirements
I Traffic volumes determined for the Secondary Plan and future background traffic identified an
increase of about 443% in twenty years for both directions on County Rd 22 west of County Rd
93, (PM peak hour 2,071 VPH), This volume of traffic can be accommodated on the two lane
I county roads, Should traffic volumes increase beyond those forecasted, due to additional
regional traffic, additional slip around and left turn lanes may be warranted at intersections,
I One additional lane will be required for both County Road 22 approaches to County Road 22 &
93 intersection. The additionallane will allow a standard four lane cross-section initially, A
center left turn lane will need to be added for future traffic and growth. Additional dedicated
I
March,2005 54
I
I *Trow
DRAFT
I
Cralghurst Secondary Plan - Master Servicing Report BAlF0013761A
I turn lanes and merge lanes for right turning movements may be required (but are not expected) to
accommodate turning movements, if traffic delays warrant the dedicated right turn lanes.
I Due to the amount of straight through traffic, advance green signals are not expected to be
needed until the dedicated (center) left turn lanes are provided, However, signal timing should
I be reviewed periodically to ensure green time favouring County Rd 22 traffic is suitable.
To accommodate road widening for additional lanes through the intersection, County Roads 22
I and 93 will require extension of the 20 meter right-of-ways to 30 meters with an urban cross-
section for storm sewers, curb and gutters,
I A curb and gutter urban standard is recommended at the intersection of County Roads 22 and 93.
Intersection analysis should be undertaken as developments are reviewed to recognize regional
developments and background traffic growth, over a 20 year design horizon. The addition of
I turning lanes into other intersections may be warranted over time as traffic volumes and traffic
delays increase,
I Although an urban road cross-section with curb and gutter may be better for home marketing, a
semi-urban road cross-section with ditches for stormwater drainage is recommended for the
following reasons:
I . Ditches promote stormwater infiltration, a best management practice
. Ditches provide better snow storage and reduced snow bank heights for driveway
I access and safety entering the public roads
. Ditch capacity accommodates higher storm flows
I
. Ditches are more beneficial for lot drainage
I . Ditches cost less to construct and maintain than curb, gutters, catchbasins, stormwater
management facilities, etc.
I All internal two lane local and minor collector roads should be constructed within a 20 meter
right-of-way. The internal major collector roads should be provided with 26 meter right-of-
ways,
I Lots bordering on County Road 22 and 93 should not have direct access to minimize traffic
interruption and improve safety on the arterial roads, Intersections onto the arterial roads should
I be about 200 meters apart to improve sight lines and minimize traffic interference for turning
movements and queue storage.
I There should be "No Parking" allowed on the arterial County Roads 22 and 93.
Traffic speeds through the Secondary Plan on County Roads 22 and 93 should be reduced to 60
I km!h beginning 150 m beyond the study area,
March,2005 55
I
I ~Trow
DRAFT
I
Craighurst Secondary Plan - Master Servicing Report BAlF0013761A
I To accommodate train delays, additional approach lanes to the railway will be necessary for
queue storage, Initially a storage lane between Highway 400 and the rail track on County Road
I 22 will be necessary. For train stoppage, queue extension onto the Highway 400 north off ramps
may periodically develop. Traffic will be able to continue north on Highway 400 to County Rd
93 to bypass train stoppage at County Rd 22, by turning west at County Rd 22 to exit to Highway
I 400 north.
Train stoppage prior to County Roads 22 and 93 by signal relocation (if necessary) should be
I investigated with CPR to minimize County road blockage. Warning signals at detour points can
also be provided to encourage detours if rail traffic interferes with road traffic on a frequent basis
or for prolonged periods, All of these measures should be investigated further at the
I development application stage, if rail delays become a problem.
6.7 Design Criteria
I Road 'design criteria based on Ontario Provincial Standards and Ontario Ministry of
Transportation standards should be used for new roads and to establish road improvements.
I Road improvements will be added in future when warranted, It is not expected that road
improvements will be needed until full build-out forecast in 2009.
I 6.7.1 Arterial Roads
I Arterial roads consisting of urban and semi-urban standards beyond the central core will require
14 meters of pavement to provide four through lanes. A center left turn/train storage lane will be
necessary from the end of the four lane section west of the County Road 93 intersection on
I County Rd 22, to the Highway 400 north off ramp intersection. The four through lanes are
expected from the most easterly intersections to Procee Circle west of County Rd 93,
I Traffic volumes on County Rd 93 are lower than County Rd 22, but in future a center left turn
lane may be needed from the CP Rail line in the north (for storage) to the left turn lane north of
County Road 22, A total width of pavement on an urban cross-section of 11 meters will be
I necessary.
Tapers to merge traffic will be necessary prior to the CPR and the end of the through lanes,
I Additional widening for center medians for safety reasons and traffic flow improvements may be
considered to discourage left tums close to the intersection. However, if center medians are
I contemplated the existing 20 meter right-of-way should be increased to 30 meters.
6.7.2 Collector Roads
I Three new primary collector roads are established at this time for the northeast, southeast and the
southwest quadrant. The new collector roads will be stop controlled prior to the intersections at
I the County Road. Collector roads will consist of 13 meters of asphalt pavement to allow traffic
March,2005 56
I
I *Trow
DRAFT
I
Cralghurst Secondary Plan - Master Servicing Report BAlF0013761A
I flow unimpeded by cars parked on the street. One meter paved shoulders will provide a travel
surface of 11 meters. Major collector roads should be posted "No Parking" on one side,
I 6.7.3 Local Roads
I Local roads and minor collectors should consist of 11 meters of asphalt pavement and one meter
of gravel shoulder, both sides. Parked cars on one side will allow two lanes of through traffic,
Pavement design should be sufficient to carry snowplows and delivery trucks. A granular base
I equivalent of 300 mm is the minimum preferred.
6.7.4 Other
I Bus turning and children pick-up and drop-off are significant traffic problems around schools,
Site Plan approval for the new school should insure that a significant bus and children pick-up
I area is available to prevent traffic queues, parked cars and traffic congestion on Village streets,
Access to the school should be one-way off secondary intemal roads as opposed to access from
County Road 22,
I 6.8 Cost
I Future site traffic, background traffic and Horseshoe Valley Resort development predominantly
drive traffic volumes to 443% of the May 1998 volumes, This is partly based on an aggressive
3% annual growth rate for the region, Actual future traffic from the Secondary Plan Area is
I modest in comparison. The PM peak hour (highest peak) is 348 trips versus the 1,193 trips due
to background traffic. Township policy requires developments such as those in the Secondary
Plan area to pay for the road improvements required as a result of development. However, the
I greater background regional traffic from outside the Secondary Plan is not caused by the
Secondary Plan development.
I In considering the impact of the Secondary Plan on traffic it depends on whether the
development and resultant traffic occur today when capacity is available, or in future when road
and intersection capacity has been depleted,
I In assessing future traffic it was determined that an additional lane of traffic was necessary on
County Road 22, Only 348 VPH or 23% contributes to the 1,541 VPH total increase,
I Consequently, the Secondary Plan development portion is about 23% of the cost. In addition,
development in the Secondary Plan must pay development charges to receive the benefit of
capital contributions from those development charges, The Township may consider the road
I work as part of the Township Development Charge if the County doesn't consider the roadwork
as part of the County Development Charge.
I For the purposes of this study, 23% of the cost of constructing the center left turn/storage lane
has been considered to be fully attributable to development within the Secondary Plan,
I
March,2005 57
I
I ~Trow
DRAFT
I
Craighurst Secondary Plan - Master Servicing Report BAlF0013761 A
I The cost of the 1750 meter additional lane and property acquisition is about $1,265,000 of which
23% amounts to about $290,950.
I Some of the cost of the additional lane can be reduced if it is completed when new sewer and
water distribution pipe is installed,
I Internal, collector and local roads are expected to cost $3,200,000 within new development or
$4,525/unit for 700 units in the new development.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
March, 2005 58
I
I *Trow
DRAFT
I
Cralghurst Secondary Plan - Master Servicing Report BAlF0013761A
I 7.0 Conclusions
I The 2005 Provincial Policy Statement directs new growth to existing Settlement Areas. Further,
the Provincial Policy Statement supports growth serviced by potable water and sanitary sewage
I in the following order of preference.
Municipal or communal water supply and sanitary sewage disposal.
-
I - Individual on-site systems where suitable.
- A mix of municipal/communal water supply or sewage disposal with individual
I water supply or sewage disposal systems.
I The 1998 Official Plan of the Township of Oro-Medonte addresses the Provincial Policy
Statement with respect to future growth within the Municipality. The Official Plan has identified
the hamlet of Craighurst as a Settlement Area. This selection is based on the location of
I Craighurst in relation to major transportation routes, development pressures and the potential of
the local environment to support additional growth.
I The preparation of a Secondary Plan for the Craighurst Settlement Area is the next level of detail
in planning for future growth,
I Based on a Background Study by Trow, about 900 residential and 9 ha of employment land use
could be developed,
A Development Options Report resulted in the preference for development of the Secondary
I Plan on full municipal services.
Located at the northwesterly tip of the Oro Moraine, there is an adequate groundwater supply
I provided by the moraine to support existing development and limited growth. The amount of
growth that the local aquifers can support should be confirmed through pump tests. Initial
estimates indicated local aquifers could provide 1,230 m3/d (average). Test wells and a Class
I Environmental Assessment will decide the preferred supply and storage altemative.
Craig's Swamp which is part of the Copeland Forest Wetland Complex and the headwaters of
I Matheson Creek, Coldwater River and the Sturgeon River, presents a hydraulic boundary to
groundwater flow down gradient of the Secondary Plan Study Area, This boundary presents an
opportunity in terms of potential options for sewage disposal and the volume that may be treated
I without impacting the environment in a negative manner.
Under application of the Ministry of Environment's Reasonable Use Policy B-7, development of
I the Secondary Plan could be supported by a municipal sewage plant with nitrate (N) removed, A
municipal sewage plant discharging to surface water could potentially service the Secondary
Plan, subject to further detailed investigations. A communal sewage system discharging to the
I
March, 2005 59
I
I *Trow
DRAFT
I
Cralghurst Secondary Plan - Master Servicing Report BAlF0013761 A
I subsurface adjacent to Craig's Swamp or wetlands to the west could also support the population.
In addition, the local soils and overburden characteristics are favourable for subsurface sewage
I disposal and treating stormwater drainage/enhancing groundwater recharge,
The MOE have begun an assimilation study of the Nottawasaga River basin, Through the Class
I Environmental Assessment process, the preferred sewage treatment process will be determined
once the assimilation study is completed.
The community is at the intersection of County Roads 22 (Horseshoe Valley Road), and 93
I (penetanguishene Road). Both are arterial roads and provide direct access to Highway 400 and
destinations beyond, The road allowance width of County Road's 22 and 93 through the hamlet
I is reduced to 20 meters (30.5 meters is normal for County arterial roads) so property acquisition
will be necessary,
I Traffic growth will increase over the next 20 years, more ITom background and regional
development than development ITom the Secondary Plan, Traffic impact ITom the Secondary
Plan is expected to be minimal, phased over the next 10 years at about 75 units/year, The total
I traffic generated is about 950 trips per hour during the PM peak hour (all directions).
The PM peak hour is historically the highest peak traffic volume, Distributed Secondary Plan
I traffic results in the highest PM Peak Hour traffic (348 VPH) on County Road 22 west of County
Road 93 intersection.
Background traffic results in a further traffic increase of 1193 VPH above the 467 VPH recorded
I in May 1998 and 454 VPH recorded in July 2001,
A regional traffic growth of 3% per year (compounded) is considered conservative generating
I the 443% traffic increase forecast for the PM peak hour traffic. As a result of the traffic forecast
intersection and corridor improvements are required.
I Improvements consist of one center turn lane for County Road 22, which becomes one additional
lane for four lanes for County Road 22 through the Village core and intersection, The center turn
lane becomes a queue storage lane for traffic delays of about five minutes for passing trains, and
I for longer delays for stopped trains. Current delays for passing and stopped trains are expected
to remain generally the same in future, That means drivers either wait or attempt to detour at
nearby intersections.
I It is expected that traffic queuing onto the Highway 400 northbound off ramps will not occur due
to the additional center storage lane being added to the south side of County Rd 22 eastbound.
I The Highway 400 northbound off ramp to County Rd 22 is over 250 meters and can also store
about 33 vehicles per lane waiting for passing or stopped trains, Traffic may also bypass County
Rd 22 by returning to Highway 400 northbound and exit at County Rd 93 northbound.
I Coordination with CPR and signal modifications is expected to help minimize traffic interference
by trains,
I
March, 2005 60
I
I *Trow
DRAFT
I
Cralghurst Secondary Plan - Master Servicing Report BAlF0013761 A
I Costs vary with the number of units serviced, For example the existing Craighurst Estates water
system services 65 equivalent units for water; the sanitary sewage system will eventually service
I all the development in the Secondary Plan, 931 equivalent units, and the storm drainage system
will service only the new development area (717 equivalent units). Costs sununarized to service
residential units plus non residential development in terms of equivalent units, for the various
I municipal services total as follows:
Water Supply and Storage $1,730/unit (equivalent)
I Water Distribution $2,300/unit (equivalent)
Sewage Treatment $4,620/unit (equivalent)
I Sewage Collection $2,900/unit (equivalent)
SWM Facilities $2,060/unit (equivalent)
I Drainage Works and Ditches $1,200/unit (equivalent)
Internal Roads, Street Lights and Utilities $4,525/unit (equivalent)
I 23% County Road Lane $415/unit (equivalent)
$ 19,750/unit (equivalenQ*
I * Some works are to benefit existing residential and commercial development and are accounted
for in this cost.
I Class Environmental Assessments for construction and reconstruction of roads, water, sewage
and stormwater facilities will defme the type, scope and preferred solutions for facilities to
service the Craighurst Secondary Plan,
I The service report supports the Craighurst Secondary Plan and identifies that development may
proceed subject to review agency requirements and Class Environmental Assessments.
I Trow Associates Inc.
I ;e:~~
Roger Tudhope, P,Eng,
I Manager, Barrie Branch
I
I
I
March, 2005 61
I
I *Trow
DRAFT
I
Cralghurst Secondary Plan - Master Servicing Report BAlF0013761A
I References
I Azimutb Environmental Consulting Inc" "Hydrogeological Study oftbe Oro Moraine, Township
ofOro-Medonte (Draft)", February, 2000.
I Chapman, L.J" Putnam, D,F., "Second Edition oftbe Physiography ofSoutbem Ontario", 1966.
I Cole, Sherman & Associates, "Traffic Assessment Report for tbe Horseshoe Valley Settlement
Node Lands", December, 1999.
I County of Simcoe, "Traffic Counts", 1998, 1999,
County of Simcoe, "Official Plan", May, 1998.
I Ecopl!jIlS Ltd., "Township of Oro-Medonte Official Plan Review, Background Report, Natural
Heritage System, Agriculture, Aggregate Resources" (Draft), January, 1996.
I MOEIMNR/Marshall Macklin Monaghan Limited, "Stormwater Management Practices Planning
and Design Manual", June, 1994.
I Ministry of Environment and Energy, "Hydrogeological Technical Information Requirements for
Land Development Applications", April, 1995,
I Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, "Provincial Policy Statement", May 22, 1996, (The
Ontario Gazette).
I MOE Well Records, and Driller's Well Records provided by Buie & Buker Drilling Ltd,
Terraprobe, "Hydrogeologic Assessment for Preparation oftbe Official Plan, Township ofOro-
I Medonte, County of Simcoe", February, 1996,
Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Autbority, Greenland International Consulting Inc" "Willow
I Creek Subwatershed Plan", December 2001.
I Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority, "Wet Pond Criteria Check", November 10, 2003,
Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Autbority, "Technical Standards for Stormwater Management
I Within N.V,C.A. Watershed", May 2000,
Ontario Ministry of the Environment, "Stormwater Management Planning and Design Manual",
I March 2003,
I
March, 2005 62
I
I *Trow
DRAFT
I
Cralghurst Secondary Plan - Master Servicing Report
BAIF0013761A
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Appendix A:
Figures
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ~
CON 1
LOT 45 <.0
(JoI
I CON I W. P. R,
CON I
LOT 44 LOT 44 CON 1
LOT 44 I
I i
I CON] W, p, R, CON I CON 1
LOT 43 LOT 43 LDT4
I I
w. p I I
T i CON J CD
I Lor 42 T 2
I i
N I II, P.
T
I
I I
faN!
or 40
I !
:
I CDN 1 W. p, R, CON J
LOT 39
I LOT 38
I ,
\, I
I .
I I
II
I 18 ~
I
I
I LOT 36 CON I
\ I LOT 36
I I ~':SEIWEElt.;tmS::3S:
I I
I Trow Associates Inc.
*'Trow 561 Bryne Drive. Unit D Tel: (705) 734-6222
BARRIE, ONTARIO L4N 9Y3 Fax: (705) 734-6224
I SCALE 1: 20,000 CUENT: JOB NO.
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE BAIF0013761 A
OAlE: FEB 2005
ll11.E:
I ORA\\I>I: RG /LC Craighu rst Secondary Plan Area FIG A
I
I ~
UJ
I f ~
ON 1 W. P R, ff , 0::
"" CON 1 CON 1 I
OT 43 -A LOT43 LOT43 ~
I 8 "'''
~~
'9'9
EMETERY /CHURCH ;1;;1; 0::
........
I lOG' W W
I 00
. t::..t::.. .... ....
I ..:...: x Z
HAZARD LAND . I t!~ ~
I . 0
N {./ P R. . C
T CON 1 W .
I LOT42 . :E z
. . <C
ACTIVE P RK I 0 ..J
I
I I 0:: c..
NI W. R. I 0 0 >
T4 CON 1 c u.. 0::
LOT 41 -
I 0 <C
CHURC (fJ
Ii!!! (]) '" C
EX. -+-' o~ c..
I CJ !=z Z
I z" -
I I 0 ::J--' J: 0
0 wo
I >- UJ
(fJ _0:: 0
0::<
(fJ 0.... Z w
I <( wZ
zo ~ UJ
I :s: >- -
o::!!!
, 0 ",0:: 0 ....
, ~o::
, II PASSIVE COMMUNITY P RK L ~~ UJ
I I ~ ....
I l- eON 1 0::
10 LOT40 :)
IN 1 ,I ELEVATED
I::;: RESERVOIR ~ J:
I T 40 i~
, EMETERY /CHURCH 0 C)
1.f>. I-
10 ~ -
I I ~
I
HAZARD LAND I
I 0
I If I CON 1 W. P R. A IVE PARK CON I I
0 LOT 39 L
I
::;:
I ~ '"
ffi ~
.f>. LEGEND 0 F
0
0 SCALE:
I \ EXISTING WA TERMAIN 1:10,000
---- PROPOSED TRUNK WATERMAIN DATE:
FEB. 2005
I PR DRAWN:
NI LLC
I
JOB:
I BAIF0013761A
i
I FIGURE 3.1
I / /
: \
! ;J: en
, <;) ~
i ~ 11 - ~
fO
lOT 43 I -A LOT 43 \ LOT 43 ~
8 ~~ ;>
~~ B I .cEMETERY/CHURCH !! w ~
I / / M I \ ~~ I- <C
/ HAZARD LAND 1: sR,_ :GAURST I i ~~ Zo 3:
, , F/ ?ii' I W
NTW.PR. ' ,'/r! I C en
T 4c [ CON],' I '" A II CON] W .
\ LOT 42' IT '/ .,'..O'!I ~I \ LDT 12 III:: Z
I . , I .,.S ..:;
'-- .
o :5
I I < '/~~ ((';(, I ..'::: --' ~ ~ . ~ 0..
N] W. F. R. I ,EX. SWM \~I~V PIIAN DY Ar:. <-> 0........
CON],{ ,..... U I ~ ~r c: ~
'- T 4 -' LOT 41' ),..J ./' III == --- T - LL ~
I CHURC't LIiil~ I C .." 1\ C (fJ 0 <C
I ~") CJRJ!I '1"1'1:......>,.,....' ".,?~. ill & ill & LOT "11 Q) a ~
EX MF , "....,..,.. I .~~- I .','.','.'.','..,.,.,.. ." . ," ., \ -+-' "''' C
' ',)G^ f-- I "...",..........>:..,'.',,/., \. 0 !:: z ...
"--- ............. ." ... . Z"'It - Z
I I ' Y9" " I = = MifdQ0I!.>, . X" I . <-> :::> -' J:
I' I , r----.. . { PL OYM I . I == - ,fHIr.N~lKi.)}>~ I g ~ ~ en 0
L J' r'--..: rnN. ,(-(;'i:V( (k( I I ......................................,. ',.'..1, -,IlIA ! (fJ 9< <(.... Z 0
. "c' I!:; .'>.'.....'..,'.'..,...,'.'."..."..', " ." <C ~ z
I ! \:io. > W
3: ~UJ ;> en
I ~ , ~ ~ (,-"-" "j:t.F (S I \ _ 0 In ~ 0
! ~ ~, 'y / ^ ,,"is. ~"\..... ,UN{ l-.i.o _ _ ~ I ~PASSIVE COMMUNITY P RK ~ 18 iii I- l-
I ! I I ~ ~ f/ ..,)< ~~\ii( - .,..',','.',.. __ CON] en
i, 1, GJ , ~f)~' ....{ 'l!!N '" .... i"~ L 14~1 LOT 40 ~
N ] \ ~ ~ ' 0 T 4,( v c\ - ~ '..' .,." 'f --"'>i :> ::J
'T 40 ! ~ 'I- y \.- 3 ~ :>
I i \ Q 'I- ", ff \\..:1: ~ ~ -;_ EMETERY/CHURCH ~ ~ ~
I I ,///----------- ~; ~ -1 ~ * ~
I SEWAGE PUMPING $", TATI upi' 7 ~ --1
'. ':/ HAZARD LAND - =1
I ClvN I ~l, I CON] W. P. R. '--A IVE PARK ...l, CON] 0
LOT 39 ( J.' ~ LOT 39 LU I J'7
~ ~~ '
> [ ~
I J ; LEGEND ~ ~
7/( / 0\ L SCALE:
I L - - - - PROPOSED TRUNK SEWER 1: 1 0,000
- - - - PROPOSED SANITARY COLLECTOR DA1E:
FEB, 2005
I J I rnN] F. P. R. DRAWN.
N I .! / 0/ 38 ,LLC
T 38 IfJ \ I JOB. BAIF0013761A
I . /!; \ r- I FIGURE 4,1
"~,. .J.:;.;iIp ~@1! <l))1Ii~~
...L !!..., 'H" 7"(' 'If i@@.,
. /;; .... ) if! 7k ,
~ ,-V. -, \E ~',
... ," ;. \';"r;?1" " " " \ I~ / t
/ .,..~......, r:i?!.c . 0" '" . v, ' , r,' !' _. .
^,. , G," .'f, "', , .
.... ., ". 'I. , " ~fi ," ~ Ii . , . .
. " , ,Cf'f-J '" '0 .' '. . '} ;:. '_ . ,0" _;- ./' ,j '.
I".. ~}. ,q;,'f,,- 7. il.fDj, j' ? 4U'~-:?:\" ,. "" .'1' .. "~/:~&,. '-;;;,:;.'~' ; ...; K ',...::"/,."[:' , ,.J....' ~~
17 if'.... ", C . p' ;/ r I /> . ," Co~;iJ; .~..../ .. i, )i".. ~~:" ~'"
,- . -, , "..-- -. ,
.- ",. ,~ , i. . '.", 0:-- ,. . d ". ,
I ," ,.), " 2P '!,~.;t~J, . " · -- ~P',. C"~ .. ;, P /~'" i( '.. ,.,',1;,.,~;~, ., ~..
'.\ '. \:,7" .. ....vfi:;z;~~. ',' ", ___A', ." . '.,. """"'n ~"
. .v ~J,.", '.. .. ''-'j '-.' . , . . .",.,",~", 00
. , , , ,,' . , " . '-. '. , ", "'" ',.,,,,,,, . ,
' , "'~ . - . . ' ".. j · " . 10. ..._YV, "M,., " " m
I . , , " ",. '2.,...,..)'~S.....,~ o.c;, ..,.i ~"', . ---," ",." ."" .. ,,~;>/, .""., 0~,i'A5 , .",,' " cc~~ >1 SS ,i'::~j l~'S.'~~;.../> ~ ~ .S
' . F"'{' ~. r-c:" ". ". .. Ce' .. ;~, . ..' c'... C,'" .. W
f~ j.'~0i', ~c".;c;cc.J'" .. . '''''.0..,','0 ~ c: . :?A1 . ,"" ( '~f;;:~ (iI';,.:" . '.:~; \ J ~:' ::H..p,,,,~':~~" ,. w rf
., ''''....~,,~ ,/ . . · , " r...""",."" f- .
I ..,...,.., ..f.'f,""&J~Y," 1/1, "~,'....",...,G.".'SSWAM", "". r"."L../ . ,,' .' """,';;';;;~.....',0~0jA ,', ,.,~jj'\~~'rli,,~ ..' Z ill
..' !., , ~~., V~..., . ''''---;I~\''J' . .', -< . '\;-- .... , ~. '-':II~~'f:'; itH, . ./~ , 0 g
Ii' ,'~I( /~!",' V" ;~, ,.~, ~,Q., ~i,.. .'. ,':, . ~..~: . . . ? 1. ,:s,"--". /'!'~""'., -H . ...." O2
~ 'x " ",' [ , '!iE9 . ~"\,\j) j . ;--::, '" . " '" ' . . >-:;;;;i(,ij,?, 11.-"''''' '" c
I ',' i(:}t',rr-;'H~" Vli;~ :..! ~?!~-. '~,', \./~?~~ G~, :, ! ' , .~:::. ....: . ~. "'.... ,',:., .?,~. ; i:' "':;
N~, 'if .", '" . . \ ./ . ("'~. '/ , 'Sif' ,,,.\;, , [C ..
'.. 'I"{' /. ~ '.. '. ""V, '" ~\i.:.: ,_ :J ...J 0 0
C' Vi. . "",-"" . ". ;'., ..' . ,"" . ',-, ~. '. >-- "0 u.iQ u
' ' " .... . . '" " , , ... > . ,
I ~,........" ,"'~, '. L.v . ~"",<_q1, :'<+;':""", ........'.>:.. :, 'c, .,..;.z,'.k<'~ ,;' ,/", ~. (',~;'V~' 0i ~ i:!: 0... 0
" . ~",. ,.. '/~. . '. ....'~" "..-0' r~. "L~;.1.) ,<( UJ~ _ g
" ,/< .. . .\': . ',9 . .~" .'. .y. .! . , """" I1""AO, :, ". , . .~;"'; 7,"/ ..xi;;;, . ~!!l! (f) (f)
." ',..,.. "?,,~..: - ",z. .. . -- >~~; 5 gjoc Z
' . , . '-- .'. . , 0 .
I '" PI / ". . ! '. '- ./'" .. ".. "', ""',. /, '- <D <( ::> +-'UJ
' . '., X. . . ""--', " ," f- .. >
~ -,1',', 0 . . .. res, ' ::: 1> ;." ,.-- __ . "-' /, ... . "L~': f- ~
I -- '" , .,.. .." ,:. . '. " . _ .-
.. .. Ii! " > ........ " - "." >?c'..<f, . ',./,. "'." "'.,., '6
~\A ;/- J ,i/~ . ... , ~ .. ~ii ,,"" . ',., o',!!' ." . '~~"', ~'_ '-'<"'--"0+', . "" ., ,0;' '" u
""", ". '-' -/'", · '," ~ .I"'J_ ',..~ . '/ 0
., ", .. , ". --.\', '/ ""'.... -- ". ..
I . ""I'.. , .'.~ '~~r'i; '#%//>0., ~\~'~,"". ,"'- >;.c "",; /, """.. ""Y.J; ,
· .. . ... .' ~, '. .. /,~, /"', ". ;;is , ' '?ZJ ~
:', c, '''''''',- @ '@. ',~ '" -- c . .. ~.. '? ~ > .... ,;~>, 7< -'" ~
I ,,'. r~, , ,J~;.~s,;';.7.$, " '-- ,.'..... .~, ~if:'", .;:: -)i(,;;~>"J') '>, ~/-,,',~ _\""~~
. . /..!/.~ -,,>p.,:, ?"~. "~?"""~-'(' , ,eT. . "', ;.,
I>ii. ',.. ~ " .~,~ ", I~~ , _~W' .'. ;", i' ., i .. ~\ ^f. ., "'~', . . ~ rT.~...'
I ",' . .,' 'r.1'"",,( , . " . .', .,' ",.-,,,," " ",
' , .. "";;r; . , " . ',,,*,,, ./ , " , ,
,:. v ",I.. .. .. 00 .~. ". -- ". , ;;1(~' "'. " /7 "", .. ,
'. "\ . '" . -- .. ; / c\. ;t.. . ~ ~
. " .', . . . , " " '..
. '. -- '. , .' ,,' ." ... '" /".),. t\;iv", ]1"";/" .,. ., .
~ \3 ~ . COOi.\. . .. , ~ ~ ' "'" .' >, .' '( " .'("
I .' '(;~\J~ ~ '@'X''''<', ' . :; C:..l' .. "'" cc'""^,, ""'
".. . ' .. 00, '" ~ . ,__,
" , ". , '.. , " ""." ~
it ~ " .. ,. . 'y '.. .- '." , 00..
iii - iF' ..F~ ~.. 0::'. ",~..."" '.. /A" ,. , ,'..,we__ , ".. '"
., ""'-' F w.... ", .('. . , "''',
' , . . , .~,. ... . " "'0.""" . . 0
I ~" ,,- K\' .. ". , "'" .., '.' . .~'" -- .. . '/~~\\i-" if., ," \.;xV-" '" ,... ..'~, 8A!FOOm61 A
~<'" i.,.".. \, .~?\\~i~A ~"'., . ..,~"V,"'ib~,*gr,.",~;,(;., ,.'" .' .~.. . .' , ::71, ~!';"'''/', ',' /~ ,,,\:tC, FIG 5,1
I ,-"i, q ';;0;<\ '.# ._'.. ~ (n ',' "",,, ,. .?"\'
.i .,.., ):/: .. .\ \"".. ,.. ..;~~!~, "~'.I...C~ .'. ./"-.... /,' ~...., ]fA" ../.' '. ,t~Oi . ,". . .i'L .
" '. -'., " ",' >0' '---"',. ' 'N. .
" ", ~ ""'3 __'".., .
" . . " .' -. ' 7"7 .,,' __'~'
I /"" /' i:,1.~. ".' /, , ,
. ; ", / """"'I
. \ Mi . -"'.:, / .-
" 0 AY, .-
I .). ! ".:drL/~ .. C&:'./: ,
1.2x1.5m CA
CON 1 W, P R,
LOT 44
O.9m DIA
CON 1 W CON 1
LOT43 LOT 43
LEGEND
~ STORMWATER
MANAGEMENT POND
CA CONCRETE ARCH
CB CONCRETE BOX
0.9x1,2m CA CP CONCRETE PIPE
N W, P R, G$P CORRIGATED STEEL
T PIPE
~ DIRECTION OF
I OVERlAND FLOW
I
NI W, R,
T4
CONSULTANT:
.......... Trow Associates Inc.
,...~-
.... -..."""""'lOf<ll'
T_.{_Jn>.......,
T..... '",,(00$)'0.>-0."
CON 1 1,2m DIA CSP CLIENT:
LOT 40
TOWNSHIP OF
ORO-MEDONTE
~ -1 HAZAR TITLE:
Ii CRAIGHURST
Ii ~
I mDIAclCON R, SECONDARY PLAN -
Ci LOT STORMWATER
I
'" MANAGEMENT
'< CONCEPT
.".
0 1:12,500
0
I
FEBRUARY 2005
LLC
CON 1 I
8AIFOO13761A
SWM-1
II / / L I
. tiC _ \ I ~
CON I CON I I <c
LOT 43 LOT 43 'I to-
"'... 0:::
"''''
"''''
""0 0
' ;icJ;
~~ c..
'! 'Rl" \ :g:g ~ U)
I . i HAZARD lAND ~7,1 i . ~~ ~ ~
NI W,PR, ~PI ~ I C
L T f;lc CON I ~ Ii! CON I W to-
LOT 42 -.J >~ ~I \ LDT 42 -=: .
, I ....~ I i-=fZ
i I P 11~= ~AC1lVE P,RK 0 c(
I '/C ((';(, '" ~II;J ~ 0::: ..J
N I W, F, R ' EX. SWMF dfFrt'1 J(I"\-frif;' AN DY A r: 0 0 c..
T 4 CDN I .di1i ..fII'4,.J!.~~ ~~ ~ .; \ ~r C LL >-
LOT41 v ~~ ~ C III 0 0:::
I CHURC IK I ~ \~ ~..., .... DI!!IUI1 - LOT ~ 1 ii5 0 ~ <c
I .." .. ....... . . .. .. . -+-' 0)
. EX. MF ."Y9: a - ' .", .""..'...'.' ':, ' .. , I I\~ 0 t-- z c.. C
~ ~~d~~dJl.;/>.> I ' . 0 ~ ~ :i: z
, ,'~, '"' I '.'J?,A'RK.......'" K"";I.:. 0 >- U) 0
UJ -~
~<(
UJ 01- Z 0
<( WZ
I zO >
x x > c" ( L . 0> i;:!!I > W
, "" ,Vttt. -I- ::> ~ ~ft
, " " " " ~ (,~t ,," J '-'-- (' I 0 IX] ~ 0 V#
I '." "" x " '<? ~ ~ I J!!.); l .;!, I LPASSIVE COMMUNITY P RK ~ 18 ~ to- to-
I::I: " x .J.:~?i >,,~~tJ - ..,"'.. CON I U)
I' ~ " x " " " 7f!N"'. ~ ~ ~ ~ LOT 40 0:::
IN I i ::E ~"" 'f x t OT '\1':7 ,;.,' ~ w ~ , ~ _
T 40 I ~ " ~ :;, ~[ ~ 0 -
I,.J>. ,,"x" \\.. 'II: 2;..... EMETERY /CHURCH \- J:
iQ ~ i:'; I I- S2
i If/ HAZARD LAND- ~ ~~- g ~ i * ~
C:rvN I /::I: CON I W, P R. ::;;crIVE PARK -L CON I 0
LOT 39( J ~ LOT 39 LU/ J':;f i
~ ::E !
I > ~
, '< ffi ~
) ~ (j ~ I LEGEND a 1=
// 0 L ~
J / PROPOSED MAJOR COLLECTOR ROAD ' 1: 10,000
DATE!
MAR. 2005
i J cnN T F. P R. DRAWN.
~N I '/, \ LOT 38 LLC
rT38 If; \ JOB. BAIF0013761A
II /I; I 'I FIGURE 6.2
I *Trow
DRAFT
I
Craighurst Secondary Plan - Master Servicing Report BAlF0013761 A
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Appendix B:
Sanitary
I
Sewage
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I @ Ministry of the Ministere de Southwestern Region du
Environment l'Environnement Region Sud-Ouest
I
Ont:1rio
733 Exeter Road 733, rue Exeter
London ,Ontario London, Ontario
I N6E 1 L3 N6E 1 L3
519/873-5000 519/873-5000
I February 21,2005 ~fEC~u~iE-
I Roger L. Tudbope, P.Eng. FES 2 5 2005
Senior Engineer
Trow Engineering ~=~-~----=-~-~..."
I UnitD
561 Bryne Drive
Barrie, Ontario
I L4N 9Y3
Dear Mr. Tudhope:
I RE: Master Service Plan - Craighurst, Township of Oro-Medonte
I Your letter of February 7,2005 to Mr, Mitchell of our Barrie District Office has been sent to me
for a response because my office is the lead for planning and environmental assessment matters,
I In your letter you request Ministry of the Environment "requirements, constraints and discharge
I criteria for acceptable ejjluent disposal alternatives" in order to complete a secondary plan and
a wastewater EA for the Village ofCraighurst. In support of this request you provided two
reports:
I 0 Craighurst Development Options, The Planning Partnership (May 3, 2001)
0 Phase 1 Background Document Water Supplv. Sewage Disposal Surface
I Water and Transportation, Oliver, Mangione, McCalla & Associates
(August 11,200)
I We understand from the planning report that it is recommended that Craighurst be planned to
accommodate a further approximately 700 lots utilizing full municipal services, The report
states there are presently 90 single detached residential dwellings and four apartment units in
I Craighurst.
Craighurst is located within the watershed of Matheson Creek. Matheson Creek, in turn, is
I within the Willow Creek watershed, Willow Creek is within the Nottawasaga River watershed,
The Province has expressed serious concems over the last year or so about the capacity of the
I Nottawasaga River watershed to assimilate the impacts of approved and future urban
I
I
I
I development. In the absence of information about the assimilative capacity ofthe watershed, the
Ministry of the Environment has stated it is not ina position to recommend more urban
development. Efforts are proceeding to provide this required information.
I As you mayor may not know, a subwatershed plan was completed for Willow Creek in
December 2001, That plan identified Matheson Creek as a cold water system. Other larger scale
I urban-type development is proceeding or has been approved in the vicinity of Craighurst (in the
headwaters of Matheson Creek): the Spring Lakes Adult Lifestyle Community in Springwater
Township, the Bidwell Road area, The Spring Lakes project envisages in the order of 800
I residential units, We have no idea about the development potential in the Bidwell Road area,
I Neither of the two docnments provided to us has any reference to the Willow Creek
Subwatershed Plan although the Oliver et al document does at least recognize Matheson Creek
and the need to consider stormwater inputs to it. Perhaps other background studies were
I produced which speak to environmental issues and, in particular, cumulative impacts,
In summary then, the Ministry of the Environment is very concerned about the capacity of the
I Nottawsaga River watershed to assimilate the impacts of further urban development without
resulting in further impairment and diminislunent of public values deriving rrom that valuable
natural resource. In the absence of such information we are not prepared or able to provide the
I guidance you request.
If clarification is required or questions arise please contact the undersigned at (519) 873-5013 or
I email "bill.armstrong@ene,gov.on,ca"
Yours truly,
I
I
I
I cc S, Yon Kursell, MMAH
I 1. Bender, Simcoe County
A. Leigh, Oro-Medonte
C, Burgess, NVCA
I 1. Mitchell, MaE
I
I
I *Trow
DRAFT
I
Craighurst Secondary Plan - Master Servicing Report BAlF0013761 A
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Appendix C:
Stormwater
I Management
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Pre Development Input Data ( up to the tOO-year storm)
I Hydrograph Hydrograph Area Curve Time DWF Total Direct
Number Type Number to Impervious Connected
Peak Impervious
I (ha) Tp ('Yo ) ('Yo )
(hrs, )
100 NASHYD 49.21 59 0,96
I 200 NASHYD 157.41 59 1.53
301 STANDHYD 16.33 59 45 40
302 NASHYD 43.13 53 0,7
I 401 STANDHYD 18.42 59 35 30
402 NASHYD 40,39 53 1.16
500 NASHYD 331.02 56 4,08 0.012
I 600 NASHYD 226.23 54,8 3.50 0.02
Initial Abstraction - Ia = 1.5 mm
I Pre Development Input Data (Timmins storm)
Hydrograph Hydrograph Area Curve Time DWF Total Direct
I Number Type Number to Impervious Connected
Peak Impervious
(ha) Tp ('Yo ) ('Yo)
I (hrs. )
100 NASHYD 49,21 69.4 0,96
200 NASHYD 157.41 69.4 1.53
I 301 STANDHYD 16.33 69.4 45 40
302 NASHYD 43,13 62.4 0.7
401 STANDHYD 18.42 69.4 35 30
I 402 NASHYD 40.39 62.4 1.16
500 NASHYD 331.02 65,9 4,08 0,012
600 NASHYD 226.23 64.5 3,50 0,02
I Initial Abstraction - Ia = 1.5 mm
Total Rainfall
I Strom Event Total Rainfall
(mm)
I 2- year 46,11
5-year 66.81
I 25-year 95.55
100- year 120,68
Timmins 193.00
I All storms are Odilia IDF SCS Type II 24 hour duration.
I
I
"
~
".....
01 '
u:<
~ ~ U.
Q ~ ~ ~
z ~ ~
. 5-'
~ ~ ~ <
0 w
It ~
~ ~ 0 0.8
~ 5
~ :;; ffi~ ~~
'" ~
~ ;; ~
ffi @) ~~ga O~
~ ~ < t ZC)
~ ~ ~~!j!~ 80
UJ-5~ W5
~~o_
iJ Mj , (/)0::
00 g the
~~~~ -;; a:?c
~~~a. ~ :;)
, ':::!E::1i u :!:
I 6~xt= o C)
. ~
~
~ 0
i ..
1f
~ .;
~ '"'
, ai ~:z
w"' ~
~.. w
I
I a~
g~ --
00
do " II
" II ~~
,,,.
I Ii ~~ x~
ill Xr
~
j .
g
ill
..", G;
I ~z c
~
<(2 z
a!:: ~
za \'!
az ill
1.>0 -
\ w <. ,,;
"'c> WM
N 0;,,< E
"z ~d ~- -
II II
~t; W w. " II Z~ ~* ~g,
$ ~~ Or
:x:~ :~ 5r.: ~d ~!i::<<i~~
~< " "
~ WM " " @) z. :IE:J . cD U') 0
\ !II! Z~ Or
oa O~ o ~ :)..J~U:>OI~
Or '" 'i' ",0
I.> ....>
....
if
, z
g . ~~
< <
i ; ~:e I.ng
od'~NIl)N....
"'..
\ '"
,
,
,
,
,
I
I 2 Metric units
*#******************************************************************************
I *# project Name: [Craighurst Secondary Plan] project Number: [13761J
*# Date 02-08-2005
*# Modeller [LLCJ
*# Company Trow ASSOCIATES INC
*# License #
I *#******************************************************************************
START TZERO=[O,OJ, METOUT= [2] I NSTORM= [1 J . NRUN=[OJ
SCS2.STM
*%-----------------1-----------------------------------------------------------1
READ STORM STORM_FILENAME= ["STORM. 001"]
I *%-----------------1-----------------------------------------------------------1
CALlB NASHYD ID=[l], HYD=["OlOO"], DT=[S]min, AREA=(49.21J (ha)J
DWF=[O] (ems), CN/C=[S9J, IA=[-lJ (nun),
N=[3], TP=[O.96]hrs, END=-l
I *%-----------------1-----------------------------------------------------------1
CALlE NASHYD ID=[2]. HYD=["0200"L DT=[5]min, AREA=[157.41] (ha) ,
DWF=[O] (ems) I CN/C=[59J. IA=[-lJ (nun),
N=[3J, TP=[1.53]hrs, END=-l
*%-----------------1-----------------------------------------------------------1
I ADD HYD IDsum=[3] , NHYD=["0120"], IDs to add=[1+2]
*%-----------------1-----------------------------------------------------------1
CALIB STANDHYD ID=[4], NHYD=["0301"], DT=[l] (min) , AREA=[16.33] (ha) ,
XIMP=[O,40J, TIMP=[O.45J, DWF= [OJ (ems) I LOSS= [2J I
BeS curve number CN=[59],
I Pervious surfaces: IAper=[S.O] (rom), SLPP=[2.96J (%),
LGP=[760J (m). MNP=[O,2SJ. SCP=[O] (min) I
Impervious surfaces: IAimp=[1.5J (rom), SLPI= [2, 96J (%) ,
LGI=[760J (m). MNI=[O,013J, se!::: [OJ {min} I
END=-l
I *%-----------------1-----------------------------------------------------------1
CALlB NASHYD ID=[SJ, HYD=[n0302"] I DT=[5)min, AREA.:::: [43.13J (ha),
DWF=[OJ (ems) J CN/C=[S3]. IA= [-lJ (nun) ,
N=[3], TP=[O.70Jhrs, END=-l
I *%-----------------1-----------------------------------------------------------1
ADD HYD IDsum= [6] I NHYD= ["0300"] I IDs to add=[4+5]
*%-----------------1-----------------------------------------------------------1
CALlB STANDHYD ID=[7J. NHYD=["0401"J. DT=[l] (min) I AREA=[18.42J (ha}J
XIMP=[O.30] , TIMP=[0.3SJ, DWF= [0] (ems) I LOSS=[2J.
I Bes curve number CN=[59J I
Pervious surfaces: IAper=[5.0] (rom), SLPP=[2.74J 1%1.
LGP=[760J (m). MNP=[0.2SJ. SCP=[OJ (min) I
Impervious surfaces: IAimp=[1.5] (rom), SLPI= [3 ,14J 1%1 .
LGI= [700J (m), MNI=[O,013] , sel::::: [0] (min) ,
I END=-l
*%-----------------1-----------------------------------------------------------1
CALlE NASHYD ID= [8], HYD= ["0402" J , DT=[S]rnin, AREA=[40.39J (ha),
DWF=[OJ (ems), CN/C=[S3J. IA=[-lJ (nun),
N=!3], TP=[1.16Jhrs, END=-l
I *%-----------------1-----------------------------------------------------------1
ADD HYD IDsum=[9J. NHYD=["0400"J, IDs to add=[7+8]
'%-----------------1-----------------------------------------------------------1
CALlB NASHYD ID=[lJ, HYD=["OSOl"J. DT=[S]min, AREA=[331.02J (ha) ,
DWF=[O.012] (ems), CN/C=[S6J, IA=[-lJ (nun),
I N=[3J, TP=[4.08]hrs, END=-l
*%-----------------1-----------------------------------------------------------1
CALlB NASHYD ID= [2] , HYD=["0601"J. DT=[S]min, AREA=[226.23] {haj,
DWF=[O.02] (ems), CN/C=[S4.8J, IA=[-lJ (nun).
I N=!3]. TP= [3. 50]hrs, END=-l
*%-----------------1-----------------------------------------------------------1
* ses 5 Year 24 Hour Storm
START TZERO=[O.OJ METOUT= [ 0 J , NSTORM= [ 1 J , NRUN=[2J
SCS5.STM
I * SCS 25 Year 24 Hour Storm
START TZERO=[O.OJ METOUT= [0] , NSTORM= [1] , NRUN=[3J
SCS25.STM
* SCS 100 Year 24 Hour Storm
START TZERO=[O,OJ METOUT=[OJ, NSTORM= [1 J . NRUN= [4J
I SCSIOO.STM
*%-----------------1-----------------------------------------------------------1
FINISH
I
I
I
I -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
888SB W W M M H H Y Y M M 000 999 999 ---------
---------
I s w w W MM MM H H y y MM MM 0 0 9 9 9 9
888SB W W W MMM HHHHH y MMM 0 0 ## 9 9 9 9 Ver. 4,02
S WW M M H H y M M 0 0 9999 9999 July 1999
888SB WW M M H H Y M M 000 9 9 =========
9 9 9 9 # 7518806
I StormWater Management HYdrologic Model 999 999 ---------
---------
***************************************************************************
*************************** SWMHYMO-99 Ver/4.02 ***************************
******* A single event and continuous hydrologic simulation model *******
I ******* based on the principles of HYMO and its successors *******
******* OTTHYMO-83 and OTTHYMO-89. *******
***************************************************************************
******* Distributed by: J.F. Sabourin and Associates Inc. *******
I ******* Ottawa, Ontario: (613) 727-5199 *******
******* Gatineau, Quebec: (819) 243-6858 *******
******* E-Mail: swmhymo@jfsa.Com *******
***************************************************************************
I +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++ Licensed user: Oliver, Mangione,McCalla Ltd, Division of Tro+++++++
+++++++ Nepean SERIAL#:7518806 +++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I ***************************************************************************
******* ++++++ PROGRAM ARRAY DIMENSIONS ++++++ *******
******* Maximum value for ID numbers 10 *******
******* Max. number of rainfall points: 15000 *******
******* Max. number of flow points 15000 *******
I ***************************************************************************
*** DESCRIPTION SUMMARY TABLE HEADERS (units depend on METOUT in START) *H
***---------------------------------------------------------------------***
I H* ID: Hydrograph IDentification numbers, (1-10) . H*
*** NHYD: Hydrograph reference numbers, (6 digits or characters) . H*
*** AREA: Drainage area associated with hydrograph, (ac. ) or (ha,), H*
*** QPEAK: Peak flow of simulated hydrograph, (ft^3is) or (m^3/s) ***
*** TpeakDate_hh:mm is the date and time of the peak flow. *H
I H* R.V. : Runoff Volume of simulated hydrograph, (in) or (rom) ***
H* R.C. : Runoff Coefficient of simulated hydrograph, (ratio) ***
*H * , see WARNING or NOTE message printed at end of run. H*
*H **: see ERROR message printed at end of run, *H
***************************************************************************
I ***************************************************************************
......,.......,.,...."......".....,........................................
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . .
***************************************************************************
I ********************* SUMMARY OUT PUT *********************
***************************************************************************
* DATE: 2005-02-25 TIME: 12,34,41 RUN COUNTER: 000152 *
I ***************************************************************************
. Input filename: C:\PROGRA-1\SWMHYMO\PROJECTS\13761\13761ex.dat *
* Output filename: C:\PROGRA-1\SWMHYMO\PROJECTS\13761\13761ex.out *
* Summary filename: C:\PROGRA-l\SWMHYMO\PROJECTS\13761\13761ex.sum *
* User comments: *
I * 1, *
* 2: *
* 3: *
***************************************************************************
I #******************************************************************************
# project Name: [Craighurst Secondary Plan] Project Number: [13761J
# Date 02-08-2005
I # Modeller [LLCJ
# Company Trow ASSOCIATES INC
# License #
#******************************************************************************
RUN:COMMAND#
I 001,0001----------------------------------------------------------------------
START
I
I
I [TZERO ::: .00 hrs on OJ
[METOUT= 2 (l=imperial, 2=metric output)]
[NSTORM= 1 J
I [NRUN = 1 J
001,0002--------------------___________________________________________________
READ STORM
Filename = STORM.aOl
Comment :::: 2 YR. BeS. STORM
I [SDT=12.00:SDUR= 24. 00: PTOT= 46.11J
00l:0003---------------ID:NHYD-------AREA----QPEAK-TpeakDate_hh:mm----R.V.-R.C.-
CALlB NASHYD 01,0100 49.21 .009 No_date 19,24 .62 ,014
[CN= 59.0, N= 3.00J
[Tp= ,96,OT= 6.00J
I 00l:0004---------------ID:NHYD-------AREA----QPEAK-TpeakDate_hh:rnm----R.V.-R.C.-
CALIB NASHYD 02:0200 157.41 .029 No_date 20,06 .62 .014
[CN= 59.0, N= 3.00]
[Tp= 1.53,OT= 6.00J
I 00l:000S---------------ID:NHYD-------AREA----QPEAK-TpeakDate_hh:mm----R.V.-R.C.-
ADD HYD 01,0100 49.21 .009 No_date 19,24 .62 n/a
+ 02,0200 157.41 .029 No_date 20,06 ,62 n/a
[OT= 6.00J SUM::: 03,0120 206,62 .038 No_date 19,4S .62 n/a
00l:0006---------------ID:NHYD-------AREA----QPEAK-TpeakDate_hh:mm----R.V,-R.C.-
I CALlB STANDHYD 04,0301 16.33 .774 No_date 12 ,02 22.93 .497
[XIMP=.40:TIMP=.45]
[LOSS::: 2 ,CN= 59,OJ
[pervious area: IAper= 5.00:SLPP=2.96:LGP= 760.:MNP=.250:SCP= , OJ
[ Impervious area: IAimp= 1.50:SLPI=2.96:LGI= 760.:MNI=.013:SCl= . OJ
I 001:0007---------------ID:NHYD-------AREA----QPEAK-TpeakDate~hh:mm----R.V.-R.C.-
CALlB NASHYD 05,0302 43,13 .000 No_date 24,12 .00 .000
[CN= 53.0, N= 3.00J
[Tp= .70,OT= 6.00J
I 001:0008---------------lD:NHYD-------AREA----QPEAK-TpeakDate_hh:mm----R.V.-R.C.-
ADD HYD 04,0301 16.33 .774 No_date 12,02 22,93 n/a
+ 05,0302 43.13 .000 No_date 24,12 .00 n/a
[DT= 1.00J SUM= 06,0300 59,46 .774 No_date 12,02 6.30 n/a
001:0009---------------ID:NHYD-------AREA----QPEAK-TpeakDate_hh:mm----R.V.-R.C.-
I CALlB STANDHYD 07,0401 18.42 .669 No~date 12,02 19,25 .417
[XlMP=.30:TlMP=.35]
[LOSS= 2 ,CN= 59.0J
[Pervious area: IAper= 5.00:SLPP=2.74:LGP= 760.:MNP=.250:SCP= ,OJ
[Impervious area: lAimp= 1.50:SLPl=3.14:LGI= 700. :MNI=.013:SCI= . OJ
I 001:0010---------------ID:NHYD-------AREA----QPEAK-TpeakDate~hh:mm----R.V.-R.C.-
CALIB NASHYD OS,0402 40.39 . 000 No~date 24: 36 ,00 .000
[CN= 53,0, N= 3.00J
[Tp= 1.16,DT= 6.00J
00l:0011---------------ID:NHYD-------AREA----QPEAK-TpeakDate_hh:mm----R.V.-R.C.-
I ADD HYD 07,0401 1S,42 .669 No_date 12,02 19.25 n/a
+ OS,0402 40,39 .000 No_date 24,36 ,00 n/a
[DT= 1.00J SUM= 09,0400 5S.S1 .669 No_date 12,02 6.03 n/a
001:0012---------------ID:NHYD-------AREA----QPEAK-TpeakDate_hh:mm----R.V.-R.C.-
CALIB NASHYD 01,0501 331.02 .030 No_date 25,24 ,19 ,004
I [CN= 56,0, N= 3,OOJ
[Tp= 4.0S,DT= 6.00J
001:0013---------------lD:NHYD-------AREA----QPEAK-TpeakDate~hh:mm----R.V.-R.C.-
CALIB NASHYD 02,0601 226.23 .027 No_date 25,30 .OS .002
I [CN= 54.S, N= 3,OOJ
[Tp= 3,50,DT= 6.00J
** END OF RUN : 1
*******************************************************************************
I
I RUN:COMMAND#
002,0001-------------------------_____________________________________________
START
[TZERO = .00 hrs on OJ
[METOUT= 2 (l=imperial, 2=metric output)]
I [NSTORM= 1 J
[NRUN = 2 J
#******************************************************************************
# Project Name: [Craighurst Secondary Plan] Project Number: [13761J
I # Date 02-0S-2005
# Modeller [LLCJ
I
I
I # Company : Trow ASSOCIATES INC
# License #
#******************************************************************************
I 002,0002--------------------------------_______________________________________
READ STORM
Filename = STORM. DOl
Comment :::: 5 YEAR S.C.S. STORM
[SOT=12.00,SOUR= 24.00: PTOT= 66,81)
I 002:0003---------------ID:NHYD-------AREA----QPEAK-TpeakDate_hh:mm----R.V.-R.C.-
CALlE NASHYD 01,0100 49,21 .098 No_date 13 ,36 4.77 .071
[CN= 59.0, N= 3,00]
[Tp= ,96,OT= 6.00]
I 002:0004---------------ID:NHYD-------AREA----QPEAK-TpeakDate_hh:mm----R.V.-R.C.-
CALlB NASHYD 02,0200 157,41 .255 No_date 14,36 4.77 .071
[CN= 59.0, N= 3.00)
[Tp= l,53,OT= 6.00]
002:0005---------------ID:NHYD-------AREA----QPEAK-TpeakDate_hh:mm----R.V.-R.C.-
I ADD HYD 01,0100 49.21 .098 No_date 13 ,36 4,77 n/a
+ 02,0200 157,41 .255 No_date 14 ,36 4.77 n/a
[OT= 6.00] SUM= 03,0120 206.62 .342 No_date 14,24 4.77 n/a
002;0006---------------ID:NHYD-------AREA----QPEAK-TpeakDate_hh:mm----R.V.-R.C.-
CALlB STANDHYD 04,0301 16.33 1.192 No_date 12:01 36,49 .546
I [XIMP=.40:TIMP=.45]
[LOSS= 2 ,CN= 59.0]
[Pervious area: IAper= 5.00:SLPP=2.96:LGP= 760. :MNP=.250:SCP= .0)
[ Impervious area: IAimp= 1.50:SLPI=2.96:LGI= 760.:MNI=.013:SCI= ,0)
002:0007---------------ID:NHYD-------AREA----QPEAK-TpeakDate_hh:mm----R.V.-R.C.-
I CALlB NASHYD 05,0302 43,13 .025 No_date 14:24 1.92 .029
, [CN= 53.0, N= 3.00)
[Tp= .70,OT= 6,00]
002:0008---------------ID:NHYD-------AREA----QPEAK-TpeakDate_bh:mm----R.V.-R.C.-
ADD HYD 04,0301 16.33 1.192 No_date 12,01 36,49 n/a
I + 05,0302 43.13 .025 No_date 14 ,24 1.92 n/a
[OT= 1. 00] SUM= 06,0300 59,46 1.192 No_date 12 ,01 11. 41 n/a
002:0009---------------ID:NHYD-------AREA----QPEAK-TpeakDate_hh:mm----R.V.-R.C.-
CALIB STANDHYD 07:0401 18.42 1.047 No_date 12,01 31. 56 .472
I [XIMP=.30:TlMP=.35J
[LOSS= 2 ,CN= 59,0)
[Pervious area: IAper= 5.00:SLPP=2.74:LGP= 760. :MNP=.250:SCP= .0]
[Impervious area: IAimp= 1.50:SLPI=3.14:LGl= 700. :MNl=.013:SCI= .0)
002:0010---------------ID:NHYD-------AREA----QPEAK-TpeakDate_hh:mm----R.V.-R.C.-
I CALlB NASHYD 08,0402 40.39 .022 No_date 16,18 1.92 .029
[CN= 53.0, N= 3.00]
[Tp= 1.16,DT= 6,00]
002:0011---------------ID:NHYD-------AREA----QPEAK-TpeakDate_hh:mm----R.V.-R.C.-
ADD HYD 07,0401 18.42 1.047 No_date 12:01 31. 56 n/a
I + 08,0402 40.39 .022 No_date 16,18 1.92 n/a
[DT= 1.00] SUM= 09,0400 58.81 1. 047 No_date 12:01 11. 20 n/a
002:0012---------------ID:NHYD-------AREA----QPEAK-TpeakDate_hh:mm----R.V.-R.C.-
CALIB NASHYD 01,0501 331.02 .237 No_date 20,54 3,19 ,048
[CN= 56,0, N= 3.00)
I [Tp= 4.08,OT= 6,00)
002:0013---------------ID:NHYD-------AREA----QPEAK-TpeakDate_hh:mm----R.V.-R.C.-
CALlB NASHYD 02,0601 226,23 .155 No_date 20,24 2.65 .040
[CN= 54,8, N= 3.00]
I [Tp= 3.50,OT= 6,OOJ
** END OF RUN : 2
*******************************************************************************
I
RUN:COMMAND#
I 003,0001-------------------------------------------___________________________
START
[TZERO = .00 hrs on 0)
[METOUT= 2 (1=imperial, 2=metric output) J
[NSTORM= 1 )
I [NRUN = 3 ]
#******************************************************************************
# Project Name: [Craighurst Secondary Plan) Project Number: [13761)
# Date 02-08-2005
I # Modeller [LLC]
# Company Trow ASSOCIATES INC
I
I
I # License # :
#******************************************************************************
003,0002----------------------------___________________________________________
I READ STORM
Filename = STORM. DOl
Comment = 25 YR. S.C.S. STORM
[SDT=12.0D:SDUR= 24.00:PTOT= 95.55]
003:0003---------------ID:NHYD-------AREA----QPEAK-TpeakDate_hh:mm----R.V.-R.C.-
I CALlE NASHYD 01: 0100 49.21 .455 No_date 13: 12 15.33 .160
[CN= 59,0, N= 3,00]
[Tp= .96,DT= 6,OOJ
003:0004---------------ID:NHYD-------AREA----QPEAK-TpeakDate_hh:mm----R.V.-R.C.-
CALlB NASHYD 02:0200 157.41 1.063 No date 14:06 15.33 .160
I [CN= 59,0, N= 3.00] -
[Tp= l,53,DT= 6.00J
003:000S---------------ID:NHYD-------AREA----QPEAK-TpeakDate_hh:mm----R.V.-R.C.-
ADD HYD 01:0100 49.21 .455 No_date 13:12 15.33 n/a
+ 02:0200 157.41 1.063 No_date 14:06 15.33 n/a
I [DT= 6.00] SUM= 03:0120 206.62 1.448 No date 13:42 15.33 n/a
003:0006---------------lD:NHYD-------AREA----QPEAK-TpeakDate_hh:mm----R.V.-R.C.-
CALlE STANDHYD 04:0301 16.33 1.653 No_date 12:01 57.26 .599
[XlMP=.40:TlMP=.45]
r [LOSS= 2 ,CN= 59.0]
[Pervious area: lAper= 5.00:SLPP=2.96:LGP= 760.:MNP=.250:SCP= .0]
(Impervious area: lAimp= 1.50:SLPI=2.96:LGI= 760. :MNl=.013:SCl= .OJ
003:0007---------------ID:NHYD-------AREA----QPEAK-TpeakDate_hh:mm----R.V.-R.C.-
CALIB NASHYD 05:0302 43.13 .229 No_date 13:00 9.25 .097
I [CN= 53.0, N= 3,OOJ
'[Tp= ,70,DT= 6.00J
003:0008---------------ID:NHYD-------AREA----QPEAK-TpeakDate_hh:mm----R.V.-R.C.-
ADD HYD 04:0301 16.33 1.653 No_date 12:01 57.26 n/a
+ 05: 0302 43.13 .229 No_date 13: 00 9.25 n/a
r [DT= 1.00] SUM= 06:0300 59.46 1.675 No date 12:01 22.43 n/a
003:0009---------------ID:NHYD-------AREA----QPEAK-TpeakDate_hh:mm----R.V.-R.C.-
CALIB STANDHYD 07:0401 18.42 1.430 No_date 12:01 50.92 .533
[XIMP=.30:TIMP=.35J
r [LOSS= 2 ,CN= 59,OJ
[Pervious area: IAper= 5.00:SLPP=2.74:LGP= 760. :MNP=.250:SCP= .0]
[Impervious area: lAimp= 1.50:SLPI=3.14:LGl= 700. :MNI=.013:SCI= .OJ
003:0010---------------ID:NHYD-------AREA----QPEAK-TpeakDate_hh:mm----R.V.-R.C.-
CALIB NASHYD 08: 0402 40.39 .160 No_date 13: 48 9.25.097
r [CN= 53.0, N= 3.00J
[Tp= 1.16,DT= 6.00J
003:0011---------------ID:NHYD-------AREA----QPEAK-TpeakDate_hh:mm----R.V.-R.C.-
ADD HYD 07:0401 18.42 1.430 No_date 12:01 50.92 n/a
+ 08:0402 40.39 .160 No_date 13:48 9.25 nla
I [DT= 1.00] SUM= 09:0400 58.81 1.436 No_date 12:01 22.30 nla
003:0012---------------lD:NHYD-------AREA----QPEAK-TpeakDate_hh:mm----R.V.-R.C.-
CALIB NASHYD 01:0501 331.02 .924 No_date 18:12 12.13 .127
[CN= 56,0, N= 3.00]
[Tp= 4.0S,DT= 6,OOJ
r 003:0013---------------lD:NHYD-------AREA----QPEAK-TpeakDate_hh:mm----R.V.-R.C.
CALlE NASHYD 02:0601 226.23 .626 No_date 17:30 10.94 .114
[CN= 54.S, N= 3,OOJ
[Tp= 3.50,DT= 6.00J
** END OF RUN: 3
I *******************************************************************************
I
RUN: COMMAND#
004,0001------------------------------------------____________________________
I START
[TZERO = .00 hrs on OJ
[METOUT= 2 (l=imperial, 2=metric output)]
[NSTORM= 1]
[NRUN = 4]
I #******************************************************************************
# Project Name: [Craighurst Secondary PlanJ Project Number: [13761J
# Date 02-08-2005
# Modeller [LLCJ
I # company Trow ASSOCIATES INC
# License #
I
I
I #******************************************************************************
004,0002-----------------------------------------------------------------------
READ STORM
I Filename:::: STORM.OOI
Conunent :::: 100 YR S.C.S. STORM
[SDT=12.00:SDUR= 24,OO,PTOT= 120,68J
004:0003---------------ID:NHYD-------AREA----QPEAK-TpeakDate~hh:rnm----R.V.-R.C.-
CALlB NASHYD 01,0100 49,21 .947 No_date 13 ,06 27,83 .231
I [CN= 59.0, N= 3,OOJ
[Tp= ,96,DT= 6,OOJ
004:0004---------------ID:NHYD-------AREA----QPEAK-TpeakDate_hh:rnm----R.V.-R.C.-
CALlE NASHYD 02,0200 157.41 2.149 No_date 13 ,54 27,83 .231
I [CN= 59.0, N= 3.00J
[Tp= 1.53,DT= 6.00J
004:0005---------------ID:NHYD-------AREA----QPEAK-TpeakDate_hh:rnm----R.V.-R.C.-
ADD HYD 01,0100 49.21 .947 No_date 13,06 27.83 n/a
+ 02,0200 157,41 2.149 No_date 13,54 27,83 n/a
I [DT= 6.00J SUM= 03,0120 206,62 2.953 No_date 13 ,36 27.83 n/a
004:0006---------------ID:NHYD-------AREA----QPEAK-TpeakDate_hh:mm----R.V.-R.C.-
CALlE STANDHYD 04,0301 16.33 2.155 No_date 12,01 76.77 ,636
[XIMP~.40:TIMP~.45]
[LOSS= 2 ,CN= 59,OJ
I [Pervious area: IAper= 5.00:SLPP=2.96:LGP= 760. :MNP=.250:SCP= .OJ
{Impervious area: IAimp~ 1.50:SLPI=2.96:LG!= 76D.:MNI=.013:SCI= .O}
004:0007-______________ID:NHYD_______AREA____QPEAK_TpeakDate_hh:mm----R.V.-R.C.-
CALIB NASHYD 05,0302 43,13 .608 No_date 12,48 19,01 .158
[CN= 53,0, N= 3,OOJ
I [Tp= .70,OT= 6.00J
G04:QOOB--_____________ID:NHYD_______AREA____QPEAK_TpeakDate_hh:mm----R.V.-R.C.-
ADD HYD 04,0301 16.33 2.155 No_date 12,01 76.77 n/a
+ 05,0302 43,13 .608 No_date 12,48 19.01 n/a
[OT= 1.00J SUM= 06,0300 59.46 2.260 No_date 12:01 34.87 n/a
I 004:0009---------------ID:NHYD-------AREA----QPEAK-TpeakDate_hh:mm----R.V.-R.C.-
CALIB STANDHYD 07,0401 18.42 1.892 No_date 12,00 69.42 .575
[XIMP~.30:TIMP~.35J
[LaSSo 2 ,CN= 59,O}
I [Pervious area: IAper= 5.00:SLPP=2.74:LGP= 760. :MNP=.250:SCP= ,OJ
[Impervious area: IAimp= 1.50:SLPI=3.14:LGI= 700.:MNI=.013:SCI= . OJ
004:0010---------------ID:NHYD-------AREA----QPEAK-TpeakDate_hh:mm----R.V.-R.C.-
CALIB NASHYD 08,0402 40.39 .404 No_date 13,30 19,01 ,158
[CN= 53,0, N= 3.00J
I [Tp= l,16,OT= 6.00}
004:0011---------------ID:NHYD-------AREA----QPEAK-TpeakDate_hh:mm----R.V.-R.C.-
ADD HYD 07:0401 18.42 1. 892 No_date 12,00 69.42 n/a
+ 08,0402 40,39 .404 No_date 13 ,30 19,01 n/a
[OT= 1.00J SUM= 09,0400 58.81 1.915 No_date 12,00 34.80 n/a
I 004:0012_______________ID:NBYD_______AREA____QPEAK_TpeakDate_hh:mm----R.V.-R.C.-
CALIB NASHYD 01,0501 331.02 1.861 No_date 17:36 23.27 .193
[CN= 56.0, N= 3,OO}
[Tp= 4.08,DT= 6.00J
I 004:0013---------------ID:NHYD-------AREA----QPEAK-TpeakDat€_hh:mm----R.V.-R.C.-
CALIB NASHYD 02,0601 226.23 1.299 No_date 16,54 21. 53 .178
[CN= 54.8, N= 3.00J
[Tp= 3.50,DT= 6.00J
004,0002-----------------------------------------------------------------------
I FINISH
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*******************************************************************************
WARNINGS J ERRORS J NOTES
-------------------------
I Simulation ended on 2005-02-25 at 12:34:51
==~========~============~===~=========================~========================
I
I
I
I
I
I 2 Metric units
*#******************************************************************************
*# Project Name: (Craighurst Secondary plan] project Number: [13761J
I *# Date 02-08-2005
*# Modeller [LLCJ
*# Company Trow ASSOCIATES INC
*# License #
*#******************************************************************************
I START TZERO=[O,OJ, METOUT= [2 J , NSTORM= [lJ, NRUN= [0]
timmins.STM
*%-----------------1-----------------------------------------------------------1
READ STORM STORM_FILENAME::: [ "STORM. 0 0 1 " ]
I *%-----------------1-----------------------------------------------------------1
CALlB NASHYD ID= [1]. HYD=["0100"] . DT=[5]min, AREA=[49.21J (ha) ,
DWF=(OJ (ems) I CN/C=[69.4J. IA= [-lJ (nun) ,
N= [3]. TP=[O.96]hrs, END=-l
*%-----------------1-----------------------------------------------------------1
I CALlE NASHYD ID=[2] . HYD= [" 0200" J , DT=[S]min, AREA:::: [157.41] (ha) ,
DWF=[O] (ems) t CN/C=[69,4] , IA= [-lJ (nun),
N=[3J. TP=[1.53Jhrs, END=-l
*%-----------------1-----------------------------------------------------------1
ADD HYD IDsum=[3] , NHYD=["0120"], IDs to add=[1+2]
I *%-----------------1-----------------------------------------------------------1
CALlB STANDHYD ID=[4]. NHYD=["0301"]. DT=[lJ (min) , AREA=[16.33J (ha) ,
XIMP=[O,40J, TIMP=[O.4S] , DWP=[O] (cms) , LOSS=[2] ,
SCS curve number CN=[69.4],
Pervious surfaces: IAper=[S.O] (rom), SLPP=[2,96] (%),
I LGP=[760J (m), MNP=[O,25], SCP= [0] (min) ,
Impervious surfaces: IAimp=[l.S] (rom), SLPI=[2.96] (%).
LGI=[760J (m). MNI=[0.013]. SCI= [0] (min) ,
END=-l
I *%-----------------1-----------------------------------------------------------1
CALlE NASHYD ID=[5J, HYD=["0302"], DT=[S]min, AREA=[43.13] (ha) ,
DWF=[O] (ems), CN/C=[62,4], IA= [-lJ (nun) ,
N=[3] . TP=[O,70Jhrs, END=-l
*%-----------------1-----------------------------------------------------------1
I ADD HYD IDsum=[6] , NHYD=["0300"], IDs to add=[4+S]
*%-----------------1-----------------------------------------------------------1
CALlE STANDHYD ID=[7]. NHYD=["0401"L DT=[1] {min} , AREA=[lS.42] (ha) ,
XIMP=[O.30J, TIMP=[O.3S], DWF=[O] (cms) , LOSS= [2].
ses curve number CN=[69.4],
I Pervious surfaces: IAper=[5.0J {rom}, SLPP= [2. 74J (%) .
LGP=[760J (m). MNP=[O.25J. SCP= [0] (min) ,
Impervious surfaces: IAimp=[1.5J (rom), SLPI=[3.14J (%),
LGI=[700] (m), M.N"I=[O.013J, SCl= [0] (min) ,
END=-l
I *%-----------------1-----------------------------------------------------------1
CALlB NASHYD ID= [8], HYD=["0402"J, DT=[S]min, AREA=[40.39] {ha},
DWF=[O] (cms) , CN/C=[62.4J, IA=[-lJ (nun),
N=[3]. TP=[1.16Jhrs, END=-l
I *%-----------------1-----------------------------------------------------------1
ADD HYD IDsum=[9] , NHYD=["0400"J, IDs to add=[7+S]
*%-----------------1-----------------------------------------------------------1
CALlE NASHYD ID=[lL HYD=["0501"], DT=[SJmin, AREA=[331.02] (ha),
DWF=[O.012] (cms) , CN/C=[65.9J. IA= [-lJ (nun),
I N=[3J, TP=[4.0SJhrs, END=-l
*%-----------------1-----------------------------------------------------------1
CALlE NASHYD ID=[2]. HYD= ["0601"]. DT=[S]min, AREA=[226.23] (ha),
DWF=[O.020J (cms) , CN/C=[64,5J. IA= [-1] (nun),
N=[3L TP=[3.50Jhrs, END=-l
I *%-----------------1-----------------------------------------------------------1
FINISH
I
I
I
I
I
I -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
sssss w W M M H H Y Y M M 000 999 999 ---------
---------
I s WWW MM MM H H Y Y MM MM 0 0 9 9 9 9
S88BS W W W MMM HHHHH Y MMM 0 0 ## 9 9 9 9 Ver. 4.02
S W W M M H H y M M 0 0 9999 9999 July 1999
SS8BS w W M M H H Y M M 000 9 9 =========
9 9 9 9 # 7518806
I StormWater Management HYdrologic Model 999 999 ---------
---------
***************************************************************************
*************************** SWMHYMO-99 Ver/4.02 ***************************
******* A single event and continuous hydrologic simulation model *******
I ******* based on the principles of HYMO and its successors *******
******* OTTHYMO-83 and OTTHYMO-89. *******
***************************************************************************
******* Distributed by: J.P. Sabourin and Associates Inc. *******
I ******* Ottawa, Ontario: (6131 727-5199 *******
******* Gatineau, Quebec: (8191 243-6858 *******
******* E-Mail: swmhymo@jfsa.Com *******
***************************************************************************
I +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++ Licensed user: Oliver, Mangione , McCalla Ltd, Division of Tro+++++++
+++++++ Nepean SERIAL#:7518806 +++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I ***************************************************************************
****"'** ++++++ PROGRAM ARRAY DIMENSIONS ++++++ *******
******* Maximum value for ID numbers 10 *******
******* Max, number of rainfall points: 15000 *******
******* Max. number of flow points 15000 *******
I ***************************************************************************
*** DESCRIPTION SUMMARY TABLE HEADERS (units depend on METOUT in START) ...
***---------------------------------------------------------------------***
... ID: Hydrograph IDentification numbers, (1-10) , ...
I ... NHYD: Hydrograph reference numbers, (6 digits or characters). ...
... AREA: Drainage area associated with hydrograph, taco ) or (ha.l. ...
*** QPEAK: Peak flow of simulated hydrograph, (ft^3/sJ or (m^3/s) . ...
*** TpeakDate_hh:mrn is the date and time of the peak flow. ...
I ... R.V. : Runoff Volume of simulated hydrograph, (in) or (rom) . ...
... R.C. : Runoff Coefficient of simulated hydrograph, (ratio) . ...
... . , see WARNING or NOTE message printed at end of run. ...
... **: see ERROR message printed at end of run. ...
***************************************************************************
I ***************************************************************************
........."...................................................................
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
***************************************************************************
I ********************* SUMMARY OUT PUT *********************
***************************************************************************
. DATE: 2005-02-25 TIME: 12,34,12 RUN COUNTER: 000151 .
***************************************************************************
I . Input filename: C:\PROGRA-1\SWMHYMO\PROJECTS\13761\13761exm.dat .
* OUtput filename: C:\PROGRA-1\SWMHYMO\PROJECTS\13761\13761exm.out .
. Summary filename: C:\PROGRA-1\SWMHYMO\PROJECTS\13761\13761exm.sum .
* User comments: .
I . 1, .
. 2, .
. 3, .
***************************************************************************
I #******************************************************************************
# Project Name: rCraighurst Secondary Plan] Project Number: [13761J
# Date 02-08-2005
# Modeller [LLC)
I # Company Trow ASSOCIATES INC
# License #
#******************************************************************************
RUN: COMMAND#
I 001,0001----------------------------------------------------------------------
START
I
I
I [TZERO :::: .00 hrs on 0]
[METOUT= 2 (l=imperial, 2=metric output})
[NSTORM= 1 ]
I [NRUN = 1 )
001,0002-----------------------------------------------------------------------
READ STORM
Filename:::: STORM. DOl
Comment :::: REGIONAL STM TIMMINS
I [SDT=60.00:SDUR= 12.QO:PTOT= 193.00]
00l:0003---------------ID:NHYD-------AREA----QPEAK-TpeakDate_hh:mm----R.V.-R.C.-
CALIB NASHYD 01,0100 49,21 2.562 No_date 7:50 102,99 ,534
[CN= 69.4, N= 3.00)
I [Tp= ,96,DT= 5.00]
00l:0004---------------ID:NHYD-------AREA----QPEAK-TpeakDate_hh:mm----R.V.-R.C.-
CALlE NASHYD 02,0200 157.41 7,245 No_date 9,25 102.99 ,534
[CN= 69.4, N= 3.00]
[Tp= 1.53,DT= 5.00)
I 00l:0005---------------ID:NHYD-------AREA----QPEAK-TpeakDate_hh:mm----R.V.-R.C.-
ADD HYD 01,0100 49.21 2.562 No_date 7:50 102,99 n/a
+ 02,0200 157.41 7.245 No_date 9,25 102,99 n/a
[DT= 5.00) SUM= 03,0120 206,62 9.596 No_date 9,15 102.99 n/a
00l:0006---------------ID:NHYD-------AREA----QPEAK-TpeakDate_hh:mm----R.V.-R.C.-
I CALIB STANDHYD 04,0301 16.33 1.163 No_date 7:01 149.78 .776
[XIMP=.40:TIMP=.45]
[LOSS= 2 ,CN= 69.4)
[pervious area: IAper= 5.00:SLPP=2.96:LGP= 760. :MNP=.250:SCP= ,0)
[ Impervious area: lAimp= 1.50:SLPI=2.96:LGl= 760. :MNl=.013:sCl= .0)
I 001:0007---------------lD:NHYD-------AREA----QPEAK-TpeakDate_hh:mm----R.V.-R.C.-
'CALlB NASHYD 05,0302 43.13 2.038 No_date 7,25 83.60 .433
[CN= 62.4, N= 3,00]
[Tp= .70,DT= 5.00)
I 001:0008---------------ID:NHYD-------AREA----QPEAK-TpeakDate_hh:mm----R.V.-R.C.-
ADD HYD 04,0301 16,33 1.163 No_date 7,01 149.78 n/a
+ 05,0302 43,13 2.038 No_date 7:25 83,60 n/a
[DT= 1. 00) SUM= 06,0300 59.46 2.963 No_date 7,06 101.77 n/a
001:0009---------------ID:NHYD-------AREA----QPEAK-TpeakDate_hh:mm----R.V.-R.C.-
I CALlB STANDHYD 07,0401 18.42 1.153 No_date 7:02 142,40 ,738
[XIMP=.30:TIMP=.35J
[LOSS= 2 :CN= 69.4]
[Pervious area: IAper= 5.00:SLPP=2.74:LGP= 760.:MNP=.250:SCP= ,0)
[Impervious area: IAimp= 1.50:SLPI=3.14:LGI= 700.:MNI=.013:SCI= ,0)
I 00l:0010---------------ID:NHYD-------AREA----QPEAK-TpeakDate_hh:mm----R.V.-R.C.-
CALlB NASHYD 08,0402 40.39 1.636 No_date 9015 83,60 .433
[CN= 62.4, N= 3,00)
[Tp= 1.16,DT= 5.00)
00l:0011---------------ID:NHYD-------AREA----QPEAK-TpeakDate_hh:mm----R.V.-R.C.-
I ADD HYD 07,0401 18.42 1.153 No_date 7: 02 142.40 n/a
+ 08,0402 40,39 1. 636 No_date 9,15 83.60 n/a
[DT= 1.00) SUM= 09,0400 58.81 2.634 No_date 9,00 102.02 n/a
001:0012---------------ID:NHYD-------AREA----QPEAK-TpeakDate_hh:rnm----R.V.-R.C.-
CALlB NASHYD 01,0501 331. 02 9.212 No_date 12,45 93,22 .483
I [CN= 65.9, N= 3,00]
[Tp= 4,08,DT= 5.00)
00l:0013---------------ID:NHYD-------AREA----QPEAK-TpeakDate_hh:mm----R.V.-R.C.-
CALlE NASHYD 02,0601 226,23 6.627 No_date 12,15 89,35 ,463
I [CN= 64,5, N= 3,00]
[Tp= 3.50,DT= 5,00]
001,0014-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FINISH
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I *******************************************************************************
WARNINGS I ERRORS I NOTES
-------------------------
Simulation ended on 2005-02-25 at 12:34:14
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I
I
I
I
I *Trow
DRAFT
I
Craighurst Secondary Plan - Master Servicing Report BAlF0013761 A
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Appendix D:
Transportation
I
I
r
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
m
3 8 0 0 0 g 2 2 Q ~
CI "!. f4 g st '" <:0 ~ <-S Q)
I 0 0 N 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ a
~ ~ ~ - ro
~
I N
I ~ !! ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
M ~ ~ ~ v v ~ ~
(. ~ 8 g g g g 0 ~
<:0 N -.... (!):5 0
m m ~ <:0 ~ M g
N
I " I
U U u
::!i:::ii: o::a
is ~
~ ~ <0 ~
I m ~ ~
m 0 8 0 g g g g g g g g g g g:5 g
m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~ ~ ~
I
g g g g g g
N ~ '" <:0 '" w
I ..; ri ..; ri (\j <'i
I ~ ~~ ~ ~
r-- <:0 .., N
I g .:::ih21\ g g 15 g g g g g g g g g
o01~rH<:o ~ WNW r-- r-- N v ~ N
~ M ~ W V N N N N M N N N
I .OO!j 0 000 0 0 0 000
~ 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0
m r-- r-- ~ '" w W <:0 V M ~
.... N ~.... W M N N N N ri N N N
I ~
c w
o ~ ~
z ~ ~.!!!
.... ~ ~ ~
I 41 Ii) N.... a::: ~ .:!! ~i
~$ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
! u ~ 0 0 - ~ ~ Q)
~ 0 Q 6 Z ~ g S N ~ ~ . g g w
Q) .., k U ~ '" ~ v v ffi r-- w 0 ~ .... ~ ~ M V r-- 8 '" N
I ~ ! E ~ ~ ~ ~ : : -; a;: ~ 5 :
I ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ ~ a::: ~ ~ a::: a::: ~ a::: U I a::: a::: r-- a::: r
v 0 NON W 0 V N N <:0 '" N V <:0 W m ~
I ~ w w ~ M M N d ~ W ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ . N M d ~
<3
.
~
I ~ .... N M ~ .... N M ~ W W r-- <:0 .... N M V W W k <:0 ~
.99 ~ 6 9 9 9 ~ 9 999 9 9 999 999 ::a
~ ~ ~ N N N ~ N N N N N N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a
~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .~
~
~
I ,. '
I
I '<
I
I ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 8 !! 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ 8
0 f6 8 8 i3 8 R
~ m m
.,; .,; .,; .,; .. .. '" 'i 00 .. " .. .,; m
I g ~ 0 0
f6 0
0
" 00 '" m
I
I 0 0 g 0 0 0 0 Ii 0 g 0 !! 0 0 0
g 0 0
0 8 0 0 ~ N 0 g liS 8
~ 0 ~ ~ ~
'" .,; .,; " " '" ::: ::: ~ '" " " " .,; m
I
0 0 f6 g f6 g f6 0
g R 0
N ~ ~ w W N
.,; .,; " '" '" " '" ~
I
0 0 8 0 0 g 0 8 8 8 0 0 0 0 8 0
0 0 ~ 0 ~ f6 R 0 0 0 8
N m ~ 0 m m ~ ~ ~ 0 00
I - .,; .,; 00 " ~ 'i " " " " .. .,; " .,; .,;
r ~
m
r 0 g 8 8 Ii I!
0
~ ~ w w ~
'" " " .. m '"
I
I {j 11
;n < :!
" ~
~ 0
00 0 6
r " . .~
" 0; .11 < E ~ g "
Ii s < i' 0; :! ~ 8 -0 ~
~ ~ . < ~ u u
" < " E
.!i :! 15 ij " < ~ - " % iJ .
z < u ~ ~ 0 i!; 0; 0; '"
. 0 5 < -. E <
-. .. :: N ~ N ~ . . " N g ::
m - .. N . ~ ~ ~ N 00 S - ~ ~
I N E , N N < W m ~ v . .
~ ~ .!i . i? i? ~ " i? if ~ < i? i? i? i? ~ a
'" " ~ '" ~ '" '" " .. ~ '" ~
.
I 0 00 ~ 00 N 00 W 0 ~ :; ~ 0 N 00 m v m ~ ~ W N
.. .,; ~ '" .,; '" '" '" d ~ ~ .,; ,; .,; ,; ~ d d
I ;; N ~ ~ 00 ~ ~ w ~ m m ;; N 00 ~ 9 w ;; N 00 ~
~ :\ g 9 0 ~ 9 9 ~ 9 0 9 ~
~ i3 '" !i 8 <I <I <I <i; iiJ iiJ
1) 1) 1) 1) w
0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
I
I
r Cty Rd 93 @ Cty Rd 22- Craighurst
Traffic Count Summary
I Int.......o"' Cty Rd 93 & Cty Hd 22 I CountOa'" 5-Jul-2001 I Municipality' County of Simcoe'
North Accroach Totals South Annroach Totals
Includes Cars Trucks, & Heaws North/South Includes Cars. Trucks, & Heaws
I Hour Grand Total Total Hour Grand Total
Endlno Left Thru Rlohl Total Peds Anoroaches Endinn Left Thru Rich! Total Peds
7:00:00 10 36 6 52 0 84 7:00:00 7 20 5 32 0
8:00:00 19 69 15 103 2 157 8:00:00 17 28 9 54 0
I 9:00:00 27 56 15 98 0 178 9:00:00 27 40 13 80 0
11 :00:00 4 8 5 17 2 71 11 :00:00 15 31 8 54 0
12:00:00 17 36 22 75 5 171 12:00:00 28 54 14 96 0
13:00:00 16 52 10 78 0 161 13:00:00 21 44 18 83 0
I 13:00:00 0 0 0 0 0 o 13:00:00 0 0 0 0 0
15:00:00 6 15 6 27 0 54 15:00:00 6 13 8 27 0
16:00:00 21 56 19 96 1 247 16:00:00 51 76 24 151 8
I 17:00:00 13 55 8 76 1 174 17:00:00 21 66 11 98 2
17:00:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:00:00 0 0 0 0 0
I
I
I Totals: 133 383 106 622 11 1297 193 372 110 675 10
East Accroach Totals West Annroach Totals
Includes Cars. Trucks. & Heaws EastIWest Includes Cars, Trucks, & Hea\IVs
Hour Grand Total Total Hour Grand Total
I Endino Left Thru Rich! Total Peds Anorcaches Endinc Left Thru Rioht Total Peds
7:00:00 9 55 5 69 0 130 7:00:00 3 22 36 61 0
8:00:00 18 118 20 156 0 261 8:00:00 6 57 42 105 0
9:00:00 20 125 30 175 0 313 9:00:00 21 83 34 138 0
I 11:00:00 11 31 8 50 0 102 11:00:00 2 36 14 52 0
12:00:00 25 105 23 153 0 314 12:00:00 18 106 37 161 0
13:00:00 10 128 19 157 0 301 13:00:00 11 99 34 144 2
13:00:00 0 0 '0 0 0 0 13:00:00 0 0 0 0 0
I 15:00:00 5 32 5 42 0 103 15:00:00 3 42 16 61 0
16:00:00 19 127 21 167 0 389 16:00:00 26 151 45 222 1
17:00:00 16 139 13 168 0 378 17:00:00 21 147 42 210 0
I 17:00:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:00:00 0 0 0 0 0
I
I
Totals: 133 860 144 1137 0 2291 111 743 300 1154 3
I Calculated Values for Traffic Crossing Major Street
Hours Ending: 7:00 8:00 9:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 16:00 17:00
Crossing Values: 67 144 166 51 154 149 205 187
I
I
I
I Cty Rd 93 @ Cty Rd 22- Craighurst
Ii Morning Peak Diagram Specified Period One Hour Peak
From: 6:00:00 From: 7:45:00
Ii To: 9:00:00 To: 8:45:00
Municipality: County of Simcoe Weather conditions:
~ Site#: 0930220000 Morning clear. Afternoon overcast, windy,
Intersection: cty Rd 93 & Cty Rd 22 Person(s) who counted:
t TFR File #: 2 cm
Count date: 5-Jul-2001
I ** Signalized Intersection ** Major Road: cty Rd 93 runs N/S
North Leg Total: 196 Cyclists 1 0 0 1 t Cyclists 2 East Leg Total: 317
I North Entering: 118 Trucks 0 7 1 8 '<<' Trucks 4 East Entering: 166
;,-
North Peds: 0 Cars 16 63 30 109 Cars 72 East Peds: 0
- X
Peds Cross: .., Totals 17 70 31 Totals 78 Peds Cross:
I ~ . Cty rd 93
" .-,:':: ~ ~
CycIistsTrucks Cars Totals ,.,-' ,;ij, - '~"-'i . Cars Trucks Cyclists Totals
~
4 5 169 178 :'~-f.." 25 2 1 128
.,-.,.-)
I ~ 133 2 1:6
..:...,.. 1
( -,' - ; . .,;;C':';'.~ "".';" '.,..: -. ; <I N ~ 21 1 0
W+E .,.:;:.
I Cty rd 22 179 5 2
Cyclists Trucks Cars Totals Cty rd 22
~
14 15 -',j, S >
1 .0 ',"i';' j~!M'r:;"-""
I ',."
~
9 6 73 88 '-,",'.,-,'
~
3 4 29 36 -""<. Cty rd 93 <:w ~ Cars Trucks Cyclists Totals
i:~ ~
I 13 10 116 "~:' 114 8 9 131
X
Peds Cross: Cars 113 g Cars 20 33 11 64 Peds Cross: ..
I West Peds: 0 Trucks 12 Trucks 3 2 1 6 South Peds: 0
:'
West Entering: 139 Cyclists 3 Cyclists 2 0 0 2 South Entering: 72
-
West Leg Total: 317 Totals 128 Totals 25 35 12 South Leg Total: 200
I Comments
I
.
I
I
I
I'
Ii Cty Rd 93 @ Cty Rd 22- Craighurst
I Mid-day Peak Diagram Specified Period One Hour Peak
From: 11:00:00 From: 11:30:00
t To: 13:00:00 To: 12:30:00
Municipality: County of Simcoe Weather conditions:
I Site #: 0930220000 Morning clear, Afternoon overcast, windy,
Intersection: cty Rd 93 & cty Rd 22 Person(s) who counted:
I TFR File #: 2 cm
Count date: 5-Jui-2001
I ** Signalized Intersection ** Major Road: Cty Rd 93 runs N/S
North Leg Total: 162 Cyclists 1 3 0 4 t,'."., Cyciists 2 East Leg Total: 319
I North Entertng: 81 Trucks 1 3 1 5 ~ Trucks 3 East Entertng: 164
"'
North Peds: 1 Cars 16 37 19 72 "Cars 76 East Peds: 0
Peds Cross: "" Totals 18 43 20 Totals a:;-- Peds Cross: X
I Affi1 ~ ~ Clyrcl93
Cyclists Trucks Cars Totals ~ ~ ~ ~ Cars Trucks Cyclists Totals
5 9 154 168 L.:::J 22 1 0 23
I ~ 114 8 2 122
~w,.; """',;,,','<1 N ~ 17 1 1 19
I Clyrcl22 + 153 8 3
W E
CyciistsTrucks Cars Totals ~. Cly rd 22
'\,.
I 1 1 17 19 "'i','. S 1"',,'<< '.' '. , " ",. i)
3 6 107 116 ~ ." ,"" ,.,..,. "",
3 6 30 39 ~ ~,' 4))., ~,' Cars Trucks CycJistsTotals
t 7 13 154 Clyrd93 "'l2J LJ W 142 9 4 155
Peds Cross: X Cars 84 S' Cars 24 37 16 77 Peds Cross: ..,
West Peds: 2 Trucks 10 '.: Trucks 2 1 2 5 South Peds: 0
I West Entertng: 174 Cyclists ~ '" Cyclists 2 1 1 4 South Entering: 86
West Leg Total: 342 Totals 101 Totals 26 39 19 South Leg Total: 187
I Comments
I
I
I
I
Ii
I: Cty Rd 93 @ Cty Rd 22- Craighurst
(r Afternoon Pea~ Diagram Specified Period One Hour Peak
From: 15:00:00 From: 15:15:00
~ To: 18:00:00 To: 16:15:00
Municipality: County of Simcoe Weather conditions:
I Site#: 0930220000 Morning clear. Afternoon overcast, windy,
Intersection: Cty Rd 93 & Cty Rd 22 Person(s) who counted:
I TFR File #: 2 cm
Count date: 5-Jul-2001
I ** Signalized Intersection ** Major Road: cty Rd 93 runs N/S
North Leg Total: 223 Cyclists 0 1 0 1 Cyclists 5 East Leg Total: 378
I North Entertng: 98 Trucks 1 1 1 3 t Trucks 7 East Entertng: 184
!~
North Peds: 1 Cars 20 58 16 94 Cars 113 East Peds: 0
- X
Peds Cross: M Totals 21 60 17 Totals 125 Peds Cross:
I '" ~ Cty rd 93
~ f";
CyclistsTrucks Cars Totals ...'/:0"_ :% Cars Trucks Cyclists Totals
1b
5 8 197 210 ,:rp.....,.;. 17 1 1 19
".,
I ~ 137 4 3 144
<~r'"".~"-?;~?j!f;,t(:ffl::-~t:!;!!!:,t";'.~7;\~ri':'R~F;;1 N ~ 19 1
W+E .,.:,'.. 1 21
Cty rd 22 i~' 173 6
I 5
Cyclists Trucks Cars Totals
~ Cty cd 22
I 1 1 29 31 ~..,,~J, S t;."::,, ,,-:,,::"';",'-"'>''- .........~
.- .~'
4 5 152 161 .
...,
3 2 47 52 ~ ~ Cars Trucks Cyclists Totals
'~.,i. Ctyrd93 ~ if
I 8 8 228 ~.: 183 7 4 194
'f..'
X
Peds Cross: Cars 124 ~ Cars 40 67 15 122 Peds Cross: ""
I West Peds: 0 Trucks 4 ;-\ Trucks 3 5 1 9 South Peds: 8
West Entering: 244 Cyclists 5 Cyclists 2 3 0 5 South Entertng: 136
-
West Leg Total: 454 Totals 133 Totals 45 75 16 South Leg Total: 269
I Comments
I
I
I
I
.
.
TMC ., Cty Rd 93 @ Cty Rd 22, Craighurst
Traffic Count Summary
Int.....U.n' Cty Rd 93 & Cty Rd 22 I Caunt D,n., 26-May-98 I Munl.lpallty, County of Simcoe
North Acoroach Totals South Aooroach Totals
Includes Cars, Trucks. & Heavvs North/South Includes Cars. Trucks. & Heav,,",
Hour RiQht Grand Total Total Hour Grand Total
Endlno Left Thru Total Peds ADDroaches Endlno Left Thru Rloht Total Peds
6:00:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:00:00 0 0 0 0 0
7:00:00 13 28 9 50 0 84 7:00:00 11 10 13 34 0
8:00:00 21 44 17 82 0 134 8:00:00 13 26 13 52 0
9:00:00 29 53 16 98 0 163 9:00:00 19 27 19 65 0
11:00:00 1 4 0 5 0 13 11 :00:00 3 3 2 8 0
I 12:00:00 12 20 12 44 0 106 12:00:00 15 32 15 62 0
13:00:00 14 33 18 65 0 137 13:00:00 19 37 16 72 0
15 :00:00 0 0 0 0 0 o 15:00:00 0 0 0 0 0
, 16:00:00 15 36 18 69 5 183 16:00:00 36 51 27 114 0
17:00:00 23 55 24 102 0 243 17:00:00 55 64 22 141 1
18:00:00 24 40 16 80 1 226 18:00:00 49 70 27 146 1
,
,
t Totals: 152 313 130 595 6 1289 220 320 154 694 2
East ADDroach Totals West AODroach Totals
Includes Cars Trucks, & Heavvs EastlWest Includes Cars, Trucks, & Hea\f\/s
, Hour Grand Total Total Hour Grand Total
Endln" Left Thru Rioh! Total Peds Aooroaches Endino Left Thru Rloh! Total Peds
5:00:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:00:00 0 0 0 0 0
7:00:00 15 66 22 103 2 158 7:00:00 4 36 15 55 2
, 8:00:00 22 150 25 197 0 321 8:00:00 7 76 41 124. 0
9:00:00 25 154 23 202 0 308 9:00:00 7 72 27 106 0
11 :00:00 3 4 1 8 0 15 11 :00:00 2 4 1 7 0
12 :00:00 17 77 14 108 0 214 12:00:00 12 71 23 106 0
\ 13:00:00 20 81 8 109 0 235 13:,00:00 19 85 22 126 0
15:00:00 0 0 0 0 0 o 15:00:00 0 0 0 0 0
16:00:00 21 65 23 109 0 258 16:00:00 18 103 28 149 0
, 17:00:00 25 104 26 155 0 410 17:00:00 34 194 27 255 2
18:00:00 16 111 25 152 0 407 18:00:00 38 187 30 255 0
,
\
, Totals: 164 812 167 1143 2 2326 141 828 214 1183 4
Calculated Values for Traffic Crossing Major Street
Hours Ending: 7:00 8:00 9:00 12:00 13:00 16:00 17:00 18:00
Crossing Values: 85 179 186 106 124 147 254 243
,
,
.
Ij
I' TMC - Cty Rd 93 @ Cty Rd 22, Craighurst
Ii Morning Peak Diagram Specified Period One Hour Peak
From: 6:00:00 From: 7:30:00
Ii To: 9:00:00 To: 8:30:00
Municipality: County of Simcoe Weather conditions:
f Site#: 3122000000
Intersection: Cty Rd 93 & Cty Rd 22 Person(s) who counted:
I TFR File #: 1 S.B,
Count date: 26-May-98
I ** Signalized Intersection ** Major Road: cty Rd 93 runs NIS ,
North Leg Total: 163 Heavys 2 6 2 10 i Heavys 3 East Leg Total: 336
I North -Entering: 111 Trucks 0 3 4 .':' Trucks 6 East Entertng:
1 211
North Peds: 0 Cars 19 59 19 97 Cars 43 East Peds: 0
- X
Peds Cross: ..., Totals 21 66 24 Totals 52 Peds Crass:
, ~ .JfJ, C> Cty Rd 93
Heavys Trucks Cars Totals . . Cars Trucks Heavys Totals.
~
11 2 193 206 '. 19 1 2 22
I ~ 158 2 5 165
<( I N W 21 3 0 24
W+E ~,
i'-'.',
I Cty Rd 22 19B 6 7
Heavys Trucks Cars Totals Cty Rd 22
~
I 0 1 7 8 ':"~'- .- S tt':.q1~"':.,~;'_:.'<"'!r;!~i;;;\;,:::_:"";<:.,,.,J;-''i'::';,' ji~'_~,' ': ,;: ,.
2 4 78 84 ~
L_',
4 3 32 39 CO Cty Rd 93 <:tJ Cars Trucks Heavy. Totals
-N cP
I 6 8 117 ';; .. 108 10 7 125
Peds Cross: X Cars 112 II Cars 16 17 11 44 Peds Crass: ..
I West Peds: 0 Trucks 7 Trucks 0 4 3 7 South Peds: 0
West Entering: 131 Heavys 10 Heavys 4 1 3 8 South Entering: 59
-
West Leg Total: 337 T atais 129 Totals 20 22 17 South Leg Total: 188
I Comments
I
I
I
I
I) .
.
II TMC - Cty Rd 93 @ Cty Rd 22, Craighurst
I, Mid-day Peak Diagram Specified Period One Hour Peak
From: 11:00:00 From: 12:00:00
I' To: 13:00:00 To: 13:00:00
I Municipality: County of Simcoe Weather conditions:
Site #: 3122000000
Intersection: Cty Rd 93 & Cty Rd 22 Person(s) who counted:
I TFR File #: 1 S,8,
Count date: 26-May-98
I .- Signalized Intersection .- Major Road: cty Rd 93 runs N/S
North Leg Total: 129 Heavys 0 3 0 3 tJ Heavys 4 East Leg Total: 224
I North Entering: 65 Trucks 2 0 1 3 ~;" Trucks 0 East Entertng: 109
North Peds: 0 Cars 16 30 13 59 :' Cars 60 East Peds: 0
- X
I Peds Cross: ."" Totals 16 33 14 Totals 64 Peds Cross:
~ {J, ~ Cty Rd 93
Heavys Trucks Cars Totals ,,'. ~ " --'-::, ":;; Cars Trucks Heavys Totals
lS
I 6 5 107 118 0,'_ 8 0 0 8
(:J 74 1 6 81
-~ . ,
( , _"I N
~ 16 2 2 20
W+E ,;1~
I Cty Rd 22 98 3 8
Heavys Trucks Cars Totals ~ Cty Rd 22
I 0 0 19 19 S 1","",'1""'''''''''''''''''''''''''""",,;1;>
~
4 4 77 85 7,''''
5 0 17 22 ~ Cars Trucks Heavys Totals
.,--,
I Cty Rd 93 <t;J 'lit ~
9 4 113 ",-' ';:.,'" 106 5 4 115
Peds Cross: X Cars 63 ~ Cars 17 33 16 66 Peds Cross: ""
I West Peds: 0 Trucks 2 Trucks 2 0 0 2 South Peds: 0
West Entering: 126 Heavys 10 Heavys 0 4 0 4 South Entering: 72
-
West Leg Total: 244 Totals 75 Totals 19 37 16 South Leg Total: 147
I Comments
I
I
I
I
I: .
Ii TMC - Cty Rd 93 @ Cty Rd 22, Craighurst
II Afternoon Peak Diagram Specified Period One Hour Peak
From: 15:00:00 From: 16:15:00
'.: To: 18:00:00 To: 17:15:00
t .
I. Municipality: County of Simcoe Weather conditions:
Site #: 3122000000
Intersection: Cty Rd 93 & Cty Rd 22 Person(s)who counted:
I TFR File #: 1 S.B.
Count date: 26-May-98
I ** Signalized Intersection ** Major Road: cty Rd 93 runs N/S i
North Leg Total: 253 Heavys 2 1 0 3 t< Heavys B East Leg Total: 416
I North Eptering: 10B Trucks 1 3 0 4;: Trucks 4 East EnteJing: 160
North Peds: 0 Cars 22 49 30 101 Cars 133 East Peds: 0
I Peds Cross: '"' Totals"",2,5 5"".3 3,0,., Totals ~ Peds Cross: !
~ R1 & CtyRd93
, HeavysTrucks Cars Totals ~ ~ ~ ~ Cars Trucks HeavysTotals
I 13 12 165 190 L:J 27 0 1 28
~ 96 6 5 107
~. '",:,:~y N y 21 1 3 25
I CtyRd22 + 144 7 9
W E
I ;eavys ~rucks ~;rs :;tals ~,." S Cty ~~~::.".,)>
2 4 197 203 ~
o 1 30 31 ~ ",&,'"..,:. ~ Cars Trucks HeavysTotals
I 4 6 267 CtyRd93 ~ is LJV 249 5 2 256
Peds Cross: X Cars 100 ~'" Cars 47 66 22 135 Peds Cross: '"
West Peds: 2 Trucks 5: Trucks 5 3 1 9 South Peds: 1
I West Entering: 277 Heavys 4" Heavys 6 5 0 11 South Entering: 155
West Leg Totai: 467 Totals 109 Totals 5B 74 23 South Leg Total: 264
I Comments
I
I
I
I
I ""
Memorandum ....
I Trow
I Reference: BAIFOO13761A March 2, 2005
To: Roger Tudhope, p, Eng.
Manager, Barrie Branch
r cc:
From: Lilly Chen, p, Eng,
r Subject: Craighurst Secondary Plan Study - Transportation Encl:
r 1, Trip generation rates for a weekday am peak hour:
I Land Use Units In Out Total
I Commercial 1000 Sq ft GF A 0,63 0.40 1.03
Residential Single Unit 0.19 0.58 0.77
I Residential Multiple Unit 0.08 0.36 0.44
Active Park Acre 0,37 0.15 0.52
I
School Student 0,17 0.13 0.30
I
I 2. Trip generation rates for a weekday pm peak hour:
I Land Use Units In Out Total
Commercial 1000 sq ft GFA 1.80 1.94 3,74
I Residential Single Unit 0.65 0.37 1.02
I Residential Multiple Unit 0.35 0.19 0.54
Active Park Acre 0.21 0.38 0.59
I School Student 0.06 0.07 0.13
I
I
F:IData Files113500-999113761 craighursllTrafficlMemo Feb 2 2005.doc
I
I Memorandum, March 2, 2005 .........
Craighurst Secondary Plan - Transportation BAIF0013761A ....
I Trow
I 3. Weekday peak hour trips generated:
I Land Use Quantity Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekda' PM Peak Hour
In Out Total In Out Total
I Commercial 50,000 ft2 GF A 32 20 52 90 97 187
I Residential 640 Units 122 371 493 416 237 653
Single
I Residential 70 Units 6 25 31 25 13 38
Multiple
I Active Park 5 acres 2 1 3 1 2 3
School 540 Students 92 70 162 32 38 70
I Total 254 487 741 597 425 951
I
4, Trip generation rates for a Saturday peak hour:
I
I Land Use Units In Out Total
Commercial 1000 sa ft GFA 2.58 2.39 4,97
I Residential Single Unit 0,51 0.43 0,94
I Residential Multiple Unit 0.12 0,10 0.22
Active Park Acre 1.32 0,92 2.24
I School Student 0 0 0
I
I
I XXIb/Document10
2
I
I Memorandum, March 2, 2005 .........
Cralghurst Secondary Plan. Transportation BAlF0013161A ....
I Trow
5, Weekend peak hour trips generated:
I
I Land Use Quantity Weekend Peak Hour
In Out Total
I Commercial 50,000 ft2 GF A 129 120 249
I Residential 640 Units 326 275 601
Single
I Residential 70 Units 8 7 15
Multivle
I Active Park 5 acres 7 5 12
School 540 Students 0 0 0
I Total 470 407 877
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
3
I
~~
, r.,..?!'>-"-------<?!~c \" ~
1<~.r"~O~
m~ B) ~~
\~" -1'~
\~;~;I
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
REPORT
Dept. Report No. To: Prepared By:
PD 2005-026 Committee of the Whole Andria Leigh, MCIP,RPP
Subject: Department:
Council Removal of Holding Planning
Provision - 3 Mazepa
C.ofW. Place, Concession 11, Date:
Plan 1464, Lot 76 (Oro) AprilS, 2005
Motion # (Pierce) A.M. File #:
Date: RolI#:
010-011-15600
II BACKGROUND: I
An application has been submitted by Mr. Pierce to construct an addition to their existing
single detached dwelling accessed off Mazepa Place. As Mazepa Place is an unassumed
road, the lands are zoned with a Holding provision to ensure that a Site Plan Agreement is
entered into between the Township and the lot owner. The intent of the Site Plan
Agreement is to ensure that any buildings to be constructed are located appropriately and
to ensure that the lot owner is aware that the property is only accessed by an unassumed
road.
The landowner has executed the Site Plan Agreement and a report from Keith Mathieson,
Director of Engineering and Environmental SeNices regarding the adoption of a by-law for
the Site Plan Agreement is being presented at the Committee of the Whole meeting on
April 13, 2005. On the basis that the Site Plan Agreement satisfies the condition of the
Holding Provision, it is recommended that Council give favorable consideration to the
adoption of the by-law to remove the Holding Provision from 3 Mazepa Place (Pierce).
II RECOMMENDATION(S): ~
It is recommended to Committee that:
1. Report No. PD 2004-26 be received and adopted; and
2. That the Clerk bring forward the appropriate by-law for Council's consideration.
Respectfully submitted,
.---1~ .-t-yf
Andria Leigh, MCIP, RPP
C.A.O. Comments: Date: ~ ,7
\J ^^ \olO~
.t-
l '
C.A.O. \ ) Dept. Head
'J
- 2 -
I
I? '
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
BY-LAW NO. 2005-
"Being a By-law to remove the Holding symbol applying to
lands at 3 Mazepa Place. Concession 11, Plan 1464, Lot 76
(Oro), (Roll #43-46-010-011-15600-0000)(Pierce)"
WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte is empowered to pass
By-laws to remove a Holding provision pursuant to Section 36 of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990.
c.P.13.
AND WHEREAS Council deems it appropriate to remove the Holding provision applying to the
subject lands;
NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte enacts as
follows;
1. Schedule 'A6', to Zoning By-law No. 97-95 as amended, is hereby further amended by
removing the Holding provision applying to lands known as 3 Mazepa Place, Concession
11, Plan 1464, Lot 76 (Ora), (Roll # 43-46-010-011-15600-0000) as shown on Schedule
'A' attached hereto and forming part of this By-law.
2. This By-law shall come into effect upon the date of passage hereof, subject to the
provisions of the Planning Act, as amended.
READ A FIRST AND SECOND TIME on the 20th day of April, 2005.
READ A THIRD TIME and finally passed this day of April. 2005.
Mayor - J. Neil Craig
Clerk - Marilyn pennycook
Schedule 'A' 10 By-Law
This is Schedule 'A' to By-Law 2005-
passed the day of
Mayor
J. Neil Craig
Clerk
Marilyn Pennycook
~~c~
~ i
~
Subject Lands
/
\~ ) I
. I
\ .
\ / i
. I
~ \j LAKE SIMCOE I
/ II~ I
)\11 : ~"-.I
Township of Oro-Medonfe
~-"~
'0' o.o~ ( ~ \
1f1'~----"'~>~
"'- "<0".
t~-==:A9,;'Q4,
o II) ~)
~,....., L~;
v .. _A
^ :,.~:;
" --'-'''''''''#'
'" ""'7
-4~~-'
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
REPORT
Dept. Report No. BD2005-06 To: Committee of the Whole Prepared By: Ronald M Kolbe
Subject: Department:
Building Report
Council January- March 2005 Building
C.ofW. Date: April 5, 2005
Motion # R.M. File #:
Date: RolI#:
II BACKGROUND: ,
BuildinQ Permit January-March January - March
Update 2004 2005
Number of 86 134
Permits
Construction $6,044,613.00 $6,761,863.00
Value
Permit Fees $48,088.00 $66,638.00
Part 8 Permit $17,900.00 $16,800.00
Fees
II Analysis: ~
';> 25 Single Family Dwelling permits issued.
';> Totals include 24 Occupancy Permits issued for Millenium Homes.
II RECOMMENDATION(S): II
1. THAT Report No. Bd2005-06 be received.
Respectfully submitted,
f!~ jL1~
Ronald M. Kolbe, CBCO, AScT, MAATO
Director of Building/Bylaw Enforcement
C.A.O. Comments: Date:
CAO. D.p! H':~
- 2 -
n
')
. Permit Summary Township of Oro-Medonte
to
Construction Type Outstanding Complete Deficient Cancelled Permits Value Fees
ACCBLDG 1 0 0 0 ] $30,000.00 $257.00
ACCREN 2 0 0 0 2 $9,000.00 $200.00
AGR 4 0 0 0 4 $94,000.00 $689.00
AGRADD 1 0 0 0 1 $18,000.00 $150.00
ChangeUse 0 10 0 0 10 $0.00 $400.00
COM 3 0 0 0 3 $154,000.00 $1,512.00
COMADD 1 0 0 0 1 $68.800.00 $569.00
COMREN 2 0 0 0 2 $40.000.00 $337.00
DECK 4 0 0 0 4 $6,000.00 $375.00
DEMOLITION 2 0 0 0 2 $0.00 $50.00
FIREPLACE 0 2 0 0 2 $3,000.00 $300.00
GARAGE 1 0 0 0 1 $13,000.00 $100.00
MRES 13 0 11 0 24 $0.00 $4,400.00
POOL 1 0 0 0 1 $7,500.00 $100.00
RENOVATION ] 0 0 0 1 $40,000.00 $337.00
SEPTIC 36 0 0 0 36 $250.00 $11,550.00
SFD 25 0 0 0 25 $5.825.313.00 $47.221.00
SFDADD 7 0 0 0 7 $439,500.00 $3,955.00
SFDCU 1 0 0 0 1 $0.00 $50.00
SFDDEM 1 0 0 0 I $0.00 $50.00
SFDREN 2 0 0 0 2 $2.500.00 $492.00
SIGNS 3 0 0 0 3 $11 ,000.00 $250.00
~--~--~ ---------- -~~~---~---
111 12 11 0 134 $6,761,863.00 $73,344.00
Monday, April 04, 2005 ForPetiod from Saturday, January 01, 2005 to Thursday, March 31. 2005 Page 1 of 1
.
Buildin~ Definitions
ACCADD Accessory Building Addition
ACCBLDG Accessory Building
ACCDEM Accessory Building Demolition
AGR Agricultural Building
AGRADD Agricultural Building Addition
AGRREN Agricultural Building Renovation
Change Use Septic - Change of Use
COM Commercial Building
COMADD Commercial Building Addition
COMDEM Commercial Building Demolition
COMREN Commercial Building Renovation
DECK
DEMOLITION
FIREPLACE
GARAGE
INDADD Industrial Addition
MISC Miscellaneous
MRES Multi-Residential
POOL
PORCHCOV Covered Porch
PUB Public Building
SEPTIC New Septic System
SFD Single Family Dwelling
SFDADD Single Family Dwelling Addition
SFDDEM Single Family Dwelling Demolition
SFDREN Single Family Dwelling Renovation
SHED
SIGNS
SUN ROOM
.