04 06 2005 Council Agenda
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
DATE: WEDNESDAY, APRIL 6,2005
TIME: 7:00 P.M.
.....................................................................................................................
1. OPENING OF MEETING BY THE MAYOR
2. PRA YER/CONTEMPLA TION/REFLECTION
3. NOTICE OF ADDITIONS
4. ADOPTION OF AGENDA
5. "DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST AND THE GENERAL NATURE
THEREOF - IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ACT"
6. MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETINGS:
a) Minutes of Council Meeting of March 16, 2005.
7. RECOGNITION OF ACHIEVEMENTS:
a) Oro Thunder, Novice Rep, OMHA Ontario "CC" Champions.
b) Oro Thunder, Minor Midget Rep, OMHA Ontario "CC" & "B" Champions.
c) Oro Thunder, Bantam AE, OMHA Ontario Champions.
d) Parks and Recreation Department, Letter of Appreciation, re: Recreation Programs.
8. PUBLIC MEETINGS:
None.
9. DEPUTATIONS:
a) 7:30 p.m. John Newell, re: Waterfront Property.
10. CONSENT AGENDA CORRESPONDENCE:
a) Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority, minutes of January 14, 2005 and February
11, 2005 meetings.
Staff Recommendation: Receipt.
b) Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority, minutes of January 28,2005 meeting.
Staff Recommendation: Receipt.
c) Midland Public Library Board, minutes of February 10, 2005 meeting.
Staff Recommendation: Receipt.
d) Oro-Medonte History Association, minutes of January 31,2005 meeting.
Staff Recommendation: Receipt.
e) Beverley Hubatsch, Oro-Medonte Community Policing Committee, correspondence
dated March 12, 2005 re: Meeting Invitation, April 11 ,2005,7:30 pm, Ian Beard
Community Room.
Staff Recommendation: Receipt.
f) Sue Martin, Gaviller & Company LLP, correspondence dated March 16, 2005 re:
Independence as Auditors for the Township of Oro-Medonte.
Staff Recommendation: Receipt.
g) Gayle Wood, CAO/Secretary-Treasurer, correspondence dated March 16,2005 re:
Proclamation Request - May 15-21,2005, "Conservation Week".
Staff Recommendation: Receipt (proclaimed by Township of Oro-Medonte,
February 9, 2005).
11. MOTIONS FOR WHICH NOTICE HAS BEEN GIVEN:
a) Brought by Councillor Fountain, March 23, 2005 to be dealt with April 20, 2005 Council
meeting.
That Motion NO.6 of the Council Meeting of March 2, 2005 which states:
"Be it resolved that all changes to job descriptions for senior township staff
require the approval of council prior to implementation."
be rescinded.
12. REPORTS OF MUNICIPAL OFFICERS:
a) Keith Mathieson, Director of Engineering and Environmental Services, re: Annual
Compliance Reports - Water Supply and Treatment - 2004.
Report No. EES 2005-13, Robincrest
Report No. EES 2005-16, Warminster
13. REPORTS OF COMMITTEES:
a) Minutes of the Public Meeting, March 21, 2005 [Re: Proposed Official Plan
Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and Plan of Subdivision, Application No.
2004-0PA-02, 2004-ZBA-09, 2004-SUB-01, Concession 3, South Part of Lot 15 (Moon
Point Corporation)].
b) Minutes of the Committee of the Whole Meeting, March 23, 2005.
14. COMMUNICATIONS:
a) John Newell, correspondence submitted March 16, 2005 as par! of a Deputation, re:
By-Law 2005-011.
b) Howard Rogers, correspondence submitted March 16, 2005 as par! of a Deputation re:
By-Law 2005-011.
c) R. Kelly, Chair, Community Task Force for Physician Recruitment, correspondence
dated March 17, 2005 re: Member/Council Appointment Request.
15. IN-CAMERA:
None.
16. BY-LAWS:
a) By-law No. 2005-011 A By-law to authorize the Sale of Surplus Land, Block A
(Parts 1 to 15, Plan 51R-31905), Blocks Band C, Plan 709,
and Par! 16, Registered Plan 51 R-31905, Township of Ora-
Medonte. [for Third Reading only, As Amended].
b) By-Law No. 2005-021 A By-law to Authorize the Execution of a Site Plan Control
Agreement between The Corporation of the Township of Oro-
Medonte and 1045942 Ontario Inc. (Ken Hewitt) described as
lands as follows: Part of the West % and SE 1,4 of Lot 1,
Concession 14, Being Parts 1 , 2 and 3, 51 R-6268 - Being all
of PIN # 58530-0316 (Lt) Township of Oro-Medonte.
c) By-Law No. 2005-023 Being a By-law to change the zoning on lands within
Concession 9, Par! of Lot 10 (Oro) now in the Township of
Oro-Medonte (Plant - Roll # 43-46-010-004-05500-0000).
d) By-Law No. 2005-024 Being a By-law to change the zoning on lands within
Concession 10, West Par! Lot 10 (Oro) now in the Township
of Oro-Medonte (Houben - Roll # 43-46-010-004-08700-
0000).
e) By-Law No. 2005-025 Being a By-law to change the zoning on lands within
Concession 11, West Par! of Lot 8, RP 51 R-33214, Par! 1
(Medonte) now in the Township of Oro-Medonte (Duddy-
Roll # 43-46-020-003-13201-0000).
f) By-Law No. 2005-026 Being a By-law to change the zoning on lands within
Concession 4, West Par! of Lot 15 (Oro) now in the Township
of Oro-Medonte (McLean - Roll # 43-46-010-002-084-0000).
g) By-Law No. 2005-027 Being a By-law to change the zoning on lands within
Concession 5, Part of Lot 9, RP 51 R-33403, Part 1 (Oro) now
in the Township of Oro-Medonte (Bidwell- Roll # 43-46-010-
002-287 -0000).
h) By-Law No. 2005-028 Being a By-law to Amend By-law 98-97, a By-law to
Designate Areas of the Township as Site Plan Control Areas
(Cooke).
i) By-Law No. 2005-029 Being a By-law to Adopt Amendment No. 19 to the Official
Plan (Cooke).
j) By-Law No. 2005-030 A By-law to Authorize the Transfer and Exchange of Lands
Between The Township of Oro-Medonte and Richard and
Janet Hennig Part Lot 5, Conc. 4 [P.I.N. 74055-0008 (Lt)] and
Part of the Original Road Allowance between Lots 5 and 6,
Conc. 4 [P.I.N. 74055-0002 (Lt)] (Ora), Township of Oro-
Medonte.
k) By-Law No. 2005-031 Being a By-Law to Authorize the Execution of a Temporary
Use By-Law Agreement (Garden Suite) Between The
Township of Oro-Medonte and Montgomery and Tracey
Childs and Elsie Gilchrist [West Half of Lot 2, Concession 8
(formerly Oro), Township of Ora-Medonte, County of Simcoe].
I) By-Law No. 2005-032 A By-law to permanently close and sell Part of the Original
Road Allowance between Lots 21 and 20, Concession 6
(geographic Township of Oro), Part of PIN #58550-0168(Lt),
Township of Oro-Medonte, more particularly described as
Part 2,51 R-30525 and Part 4,51 R-33477, Township of Oro-
Medonte, County of Simcoe.
17. CONFIRMATION BY-LAW NO. 2005-022.
18. QUESTIONS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
19. ADJOURNMENT
ADDENDUM
COUNCIL MEETING
Wednesday, April 6, 2005
15. IN-CAMERA:
a) Jennifer Zieleniewski, CAO, re: Legal Matter.
b) Jennifer Zieleniewski, CAO, re: Legal Matter.
..
I
Page ] of ]
Janette Teeter
From: Mayor [neil.craig@oro-medonte.ca]
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 8:44 AM
To: Marilyn Pennycook
Cc: Chris Carter
Subject: Fw: Thank you
non Original Message non
From: Kickinq Donkev ProQuct~
To: neil.craiq@oro-medonte.ca
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 20051:06 PM
Subject: Thank you
Dear Mr Craig,
rve been meaning to write to express my appreciation to you and Council for introducing a recreation program to
township residents. We've been enrolled in Yoga and Pilates since Chris Carter started the programs. We really need to
get off the farm and get some exercise. Having the program in our neighbourhood is such a blessing. Driving to Barrie
or Gri1lia was not feasible on a regular basis. This is one of the best things that has happened to us since we moved here
in ] 993. These are excellent classes with superb teachers, at a reasonable cost.
It is also nice to meet other residents, especially in winter - it wards off cabin fever!
Yours,
Paula Pick
3/31/2005
April 4, 2005
~~ ~)
~'~. ?2rb/o'?J
SAVE OUR P ARKLANDS Deputation
Mayor and Council I have asked to speak tonight because the by-law that you will be voting on
will determine whether the Lakefront will be for EVERYONE ill: whether the Lakefront will
be for the WEALTHY only.
,...
")~.~G .
(.,
" \\
Passing this by-law to declare Lakefront property surplus will continue losing the small amount
of publicly owned Lake Simcoe Lakefront that still remains.
The Lakefront lands that the Township owns only exist because of the generosity of individuals
who donated them. They were donated with a trust that councils would uphold the agreement
forever.
All that council needs to do is uphold the two well-known sayings.
"you are only as good as your word" and "leave well enough alone"
Mayor Craig, since you have become mayor a course has been set that will see the loss of our
publicly owned lakefront lands forever. Usually it was your tie-breaking vote that selected this
course.
You have already sold a waterfront road allowance near the end of the 8th line for considerably
less than its.appraised value.
You have already used the threat of a breach of a court order to demand that this council vote on a
by-law that will have taxpayers pay more than $170,000.00 to get rid of 1/4 ofthe remaining
waterfront the Township owns.
Instead of keeping your word and honouring the agreement that was made in 1929 like all the
councils before, under your direction a Toronto lawyer was handsomely paid to try to break the
agreement.
The court has ruled that the township must keep its word. The ruling also meant that the township
need not be concerned with the liability excuse that was being used. Instead of accepting the court
ruling and retaining public ownership, more taxpayers money was squandered to get rid of the
waterfront land.
We have heard council say that it will not sell the Promenade or other parks but after passing this
by-law will the courts give you a choice?
Should this by-law be passed it will mean that the waterfront owners on the Promenade will
demand to be treated the same. The lawyers can just as easily make a side agreement for the
Promenade as they did for Plan 709. The Township's lawyer has hundreds of thousands of
reasons to do just that.
Passing this by-law will open old wounds over sharing of waterfront parks.
It will cause people to also look at the agreements for the remaining waterfront like Bayview
Memorial Park in light of the court ruling and this council's practice.
In case you have not looked recently, the conditions that Bayview Memorial Park was donated
has the words" covenant" and "use for the benefit of the citizens and residents of the
Township ofOro" - Note the word "Oro" not Oro-Medonte. Before voting to declare the
lands surplus think about the similarities between the reasons that you are getting rid of the 709
Lakefront lands and these words. How long will it be before the mayor tells council that they will
be in violation of a court order if they do not exclude everyone except those who live in Oro or do
not vote to sell the historic park?
Pick up last week's newspaper and we see that the residents of Moon Point are just learning about
this council's intent for LaketTont lands. They are also learning how much the word of some on
this council means when it comes to protecting LaketTont property near Moon Point.
During the election campaign Save Our Parklands sent out a survey and noted the statements that
were made by candidates during the election campaign. With those elected keeping their word
the by-law declaring 709 surplus will be defeated.
Of all the responses that we received Mr. Butineau's gave the strongest commitment to the
retention of all publicly owned lands especially waterfront. He went far beyond simply checking
the boxes on the survey form. He provided written comments on personal letterhead. These
written comments left no doubt that his personal beliefs were strong and he would stand up and
honour them without question.
Attached is a copv of his completed survev and the comments he provided.
I would like to highlight three of them:
Survey Question # 1 Mr. Buttineau responed " If elected I will vote to retain all publicly
owned waterfront properties. You can't get much clearer than that. To underscore his strong
commitment Mr. Butineau's Added Comments to Survey Qnestion # 1 - " I have worked
within the Municipal Parks, Recreation & Culture for the Town of Penetanguishene . I am
indisputably a strong advocate for retention and development potential of publicly owned open
spaces, waterfront properties & Parklands. These are clearly the words of someone who would
never vote to declare lakefront property surplus.
Survey Question # 2 Mr. Buttineau responed " If elected I will vote to against privatizing
lands in Plan 709. Mr. Butineau strengthened his commitment with added Comments to
Survey Question # 2- " I am very much against the privatization of prime public lands,
especially lake front properties and parklands.
Survey Question # 3 - Has to do with the use of taxpayer's money to cover the costs of
transferring the public lands to private ownership.- Mr. Buttineau responed " If elected I will
vote against this". Mr. Butineau's Added Comments to Survey Question # 3- " I am very
much azainst
The privatization of prime public lands, especially lake front properties and parklands, as
expressed in question # 2. I also oppose any transactions where the Residents (Taxpayers) as a
whole of our Municipality are responsible for paying any fees to benefit a private owner. These
are clearly the words of someone who would never vote to declare LaketTont property surplus or
vote to have the taxpayers pay $35,000.00 as part of the agreement to privatize publicly owned
lands.
f:~6
Tonight we will1fMr. Buttineau truly believes in what he said or they were simply words to get
himself elected. Will his vote respect his commitments and the wishes of the electorate or will he
cast them aside to support a highly paid Toronto lawyer who the courts have proven to be wrong?
Save Our Parklands would urge all members of Council to defeat this surplus by-law and retain
Lakefront for EVERYONE.!!Q! just for the WEALTHY only.
Save Our Parklands -- John Newell
,
.-~.....
/ '
II .
y.~
Dear .;..,,>/ ' . . bv checking the boxes tbat show
complete the followmg . are also invited.
SOur Parklands asks tbat you. Additional written comments
ave h of the followmg.
your position on eac . ublic\v owned waterfront
. d is in the process of selhng, P .
The current councIl has S?ld, an
I. pr9!"erties. If elected 1 ~;I:i; '~wned waterfront properties
I2f vote to retain all pu b:~ I . owned waterfront property
o vote to sell some pu IC)
. 1'h township has
5'" r and Lake Simcoe. e '. 0 Merlonte
2. ~~~i~~~ ~:~~~:~~~ ~~~5t~~eet ~~~a~dro:~ :;;~:~~s;;~:~i:~~:I;~~:~~~ b;~~lIing most of it
Memorial Park. The current councl. IS P n
and transferring the remainder to pnvate owners.
If elected I wilL... . I 709
o V ote in favour of privatizing lands m p an
0"" Vote against privatizing lands m Plan 709
If the plans for privatizing lands in Plan 709 are completed the. residents of Oro-
3. Medonte will lose ownership of 650 feet oflakefront and two mland parks.
Revenue from the sale of the lakefront will be given to pnvate owners and the
Taxpayers, in addition to losing the lands, will by paying $10,000 to cover the
costs of transferring the public lands into private ownershIp. If e!ected I wIll...
o Vote in favour of this
~V ote against this
4. To sell 709 lakefront property the current council amended its by-law to permit the dfirect sale
to selected private individuals by township employees without tendering or the use 0 a
rea!!Pr. If elected I will...
13"" Vote to rescind the amendment that permits township employees to sell valuable land
directly without tendering or the use of a realtor
o Vote in support of the amendment that permits township employees to sell valuable land
directly without tendering or the use of a realtor
5. The Township paid a land appraiser to appraise lakefront properties. Council gave approval
to offer the land for sale directly to selected private individuals ror less than its appraised
value. If elected I wilL...
o Vote in favour of this practice
IZ""v ote against this practice
6, Rather than requiring those who encroach on township lands to remove the encroachments
the Township is selling the lakefront lands to the encroachers. If elected I will...
I2!"'"Vote to have encroachments removed from township owned lands
o Vote in favour of selling the lands to those who encroach on them
7. The Promenade is publicly owned land on Lake Simcoe between the lOt" and
11th lines, It is similar in many ways to Plan 709. The township is retaining public
ownership of the Promenade while voting to sell waterfront lands in Plan 709, Some are
concerned that the sale of the lands in Plan 709 could set a precedent for landowners along
the Promenade to have the same option as landowners in Plan 709 resulting in the Promenade
also being sold. If elected I wilL.....
o Disregard this concern as the township does not need to be consistent
(2( Expect that the township needs to be consistent and this is a genuine concern
Please return completed form in the self addressed envelope provided
Thank you for your assistance ~ ~ JV--
lOt
DaD BuulDen
51\ s-\ecI Uhc. Oro ~
Midland. Ontario. tAR 41(.3
R.R. II I, '\. butin...ll@l>connex.net
Cellular: (70S) 730-9000 .mal. ~
Thursday, October 23, 2003
Mr. JOM E Newell
44 i.,akesbore Road Est
R.R.fll
Ore S~ion.. On1ario.
LOL 2EO
Dol Mr. Newell:
'Thank you for your letter re: San Our P....&r)..da.
1__..1 uestionnaire as -.ucsted. To better convey my position, regarding the
Enclosed, pl_ find my comp..-.. q ...... . .ry' U'
issues idenlifiod wicbin your liW'Ve'i questior..l".ain:, I offer the folloWIng elm IDa eommen .
Suney QueltIo.. .1 . ! have worked within the Municipal Parks, Recreation &: Culture Sect?~al~
20 years. I am cummtJy the Director of Parks, Recreation &. Culture for ,the T own ~f PenetaIJiU1 . am
indisputably a strona advocate for mention and development potential of pubbdy owned open speas,
waterfront ~ &: perIdands.
Suney Qu..tIou In - I am very much AVin.t the privatization of prime public lands, especially lakefront
properties and parklands
Suney Q....tIo.. 113 - I am very much A"...nlllf the privatization of prime public lands, especially lakefront
properties and parklands, as expressed in question #2. I also oppose any transactions whereby the Residents
(Taxps)'ers) as a whole of oW' Municipality are responsible for paying any fees to the benefit of a private
owner.
Suney Qu..tion. H - TIle answer choices to this question are very clear. I would, without hesitation, vote
to ~ind the amendment that pennits township employees to sell land directly (valuable or otherwise) 10
selected individuals without tendering or the use of a ReallOI'.
su.....ey Queadou ##5 - As expr&ssed in Question #4, I would strongly voice my concerns and vote against
the practice of offering the sale of land directly to selected private individuals, especially at less than the
appraised values of the lands in question. I do, however, support the practice of having lands appropriately
valued by a repuable, qualified Land Appraiser.
.... 2/
,
,
. -----
.
.
Surny QllettiOD' N6 -1 would not support the selling of any municipally owned lands to the encroachers.
My position would be in favour of having the encroachments removed from said municipally owned lands,
with sensitivity and an understanding of existing aareements or historical 'grandfather clauses'.
Survey Quettio.. tI7 - As with all decisions made by Council, I would expect consistency, fair treatment.
and equaJ consideration to all issues and/or matters of a similar scope. I would also be very opposed to the
privatization of the Promenade lands between the 10. and 11* Lines.
I hope my comments assist in clarifying my position on these matters and welcome further discussion if
required. 1 can be rea.:hed at home @ (705) 835-6164 or on my cellular phone @ (705) 730-9000,
Sincerely,
D~ U-~-
Dan Buttineau
Candidate for Councillor Ward 1
Ora Medonte.
PRESENT:
REGRETS:
STAFF PRESENT:
RECORDER:
GUESTS:
t4
Chair
Vice Chair:
Members:
Chris Carrier
Fred Nix
Walter Benotto
Mary Brett
Orville Brown
Lynn Dollin
Tom Elliott
Wayman Fairweather
Ruth Fountain
Tony Guergis (arrived at 10:04 a.m.)
Ron Henderson
Ralph Hough
Kathy Jeffrey
Ian Lang
Jennifer Lavoie
Mike McWilliam
Bob Marrs
Garry Matthews
Gord Montgomery (left at 11 :10 a.m.)
Brian Mullin (left at 11 :08 a.m.)
George Sheffer
Ron Simpson
Joan Sutherland
Barry Ward
Members:
Terry Dowdall
Michael Prowse
CAO/Secretary- Treasurer
Director of Engineering & Technical Ser.
Director of Land Mgmt. Stewardship Servo
Director of Planning
Manager, Accounts
Manager, Stewardship Services
Watershed Planner
Wayne Wilson
Glenn Switzer
Byron Wesson
Charles Burgess
Susan Whitters
Fred Dobbs
Bob Law
Laurie Barron
Glen Price, District Manager, Ministry of Natural Resources
Charlie Warte, Co-ordinator, Source Protection Planning, Conservation Ontario
Harold Parker, Former Chair, NVCA
Ken McGhee, Councillor, Town of Mono
FULL AUTHORITY ANNUAL MEETING MINUTES
NO. 1/05
14 JANUARY 2005
1. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER
Wayne R. Wilson, CAO/Secretary-Treasurer, called the meeting to order at 9:59 a,m.
2. ADOPTION OF AGENDA
RES. # 1
MOVED BY: Fred Nix
SECONDED BY: Brian Mullen
RESOLVED THAT: The Agenda for Full Authority Meeting #1/05, dated 14 January 2005,
be adopted.
Carried;
3. PECUNIARY INTEREST
None were noted.
4. REMARKS FROM THE MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND CONSERVATION
ONTARIO
Wayne R. Wilson, CAO/Secretary-Treasurer introduced Glen Price, District Manager,
Ministry of Natural Resources. Mr. Price extended greetings on behalf of the MNR and
reviewed current issues facing the Ministry of Natural Resources and Conservation Ontario.
Wayne R. Wilson, CAO/Secretary-Treasurer introduced Charlie Warte, Co-ordinator,
Source Protection Planning, Conservation Ontario. Mr. Warte extended greetings and
provided a slide presentation on the 2004 Accomplishments of Conservation Ontario.
Wayne R. Wilson thanked both Mr. Price and Mr. Warte for their remarks and extended
thanks for the continued support of the Ministry of Natural Resources and Conservation
Ontario.
Councillor Tony Guergis arrived at 10:04 a.m.
ELECTIONS
Wayne R. Wilson, CAO/Secretary-Treasurer reviewed the election procedures.
2
FULL AUTHORITY ANNUAL MEETING MINUTES
NO. 1/05
14 JANUARY 2005
APPOINTMENT OF ELECTION CONDUCTOR
RES. #2
MOVED BY: Orville Brown
SECONDED BY: Bruce Mullin
RESOLVED THAT: The Full Authority accept the services of Glen Price, M.N.R., for the
position of Election Conductor for the Chair & Vice-Chair of the NVCA 2005 elections.
Carried;
APPOINTMENT OF SCRUTINEERS
RES. # 3
MOVED BY: Tom Elliott
SECONDED BY: Ian Lang
RESOLVED THAT: Byron Wesson and Charles Burgess be appointed as Scrutineers for
the duration of the NVCA 2005 elections.
Carried;
MR. GLEN PRICE CHAIRED THIS PORTION OF THE MEETING.
5. ELECTION OF AUTHORITY CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR
Nominations for the Position of Chair:
RES. # 4
MOVED BY: Kathy Jeffery SECONDED BY: Fred Nix
RESOLVED THAT: Chris Carrier be nominated for the position of Chair of the
Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority for 2005.
Carried;
Chris Carrier confirmed his acceptance for the nomination.
Glen Price asked three times for further nominations. Being none, Chris Carrier was
declared Chair by acclamation.
RES. #5
MOVED BY: Gary Matthews
SECONDED BY: W. Fairweather
RESOLVED THAT: The nomination for the position of Chair of the NVCA be closed.
Carried;
Nominations for the Position of Vice-Chair:
RES. #6
MOVED BY: Fred Nix
SECONDED BY: Ian Lang
RESOLVED THAT: Walter Benotto be nominated for the position of Vice Chair of the
Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority for 2005.
Carried;
3
FULL AUTHORITY ANNUAL MEETING MINUTES
NO. 1/05
14 JANUARY 2005
Glen Price asked three times for further nominations. Being none, Walter Benotto was
declared Vice-Chair by acclamation.
RES. #7
MOVED BY: Walter Benotto
SECONDED BY: Fred Nix
RESOLVED THAT: The nomination for the position of Vice-Chair of the NVCA be
closed.
Carried;
CHRIS CARRIER ASSUMED THE CHAIR AND CALLED FOR NOMINATIONS FOR THE FIVE
POSITIONS OF EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE.
6. ELECTION OF EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEMBERS
Nominations for Position of Executive Committee Members:
RES. #8
MOVED BY: George Sheffer
SECONDED BY: Walter Benotto
RESOLVED THAT: Barry Ward be nominated for the position of Executive member of the
Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority for 2005.
Carried;
RES. #9
MOVED BY: Ralph Hough
SECONDED BY: Jennifer Lavoie
RESOLVED THAT: Ian Lang be nominated for the position of Executive member of the
Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority for 2005.
Carried;
RES. #10
MOVED BY: Walter Benotto
SECONDED BY: Bob Marrs
RESOLVED THAT: Tom Elliott be nominated for the position of Executive of the
Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority for 2005.
Carried;
RES. #11
MOVED BY: Barry Ward
SECONDED BY: Mike McWilliam
RESOLVED THAT: George Sheffer be nominated for the position of Executive of the
Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority for 2005.
Carried;
4
FULL AUTHORITY ANNUAL MEETING MINUTES
NO. 1/05
14 JANUARY 2005
RES. #12
MOVED BY: Joan Sutherland
SECONDED BY: Lynn Dollin
RESOLVED THAT: Bob Marrs be nominated for the position of Executive of the
Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority for 2005.
Carried;
Being no further nominations.
RES. #13
MOVED BY: Barry Ward
SECONDED BY: Walter Benotto
RESOLVED THAT: The nomination for the five (5) positions of the Executive Committee
of the N V C A be closed.
Carried;
The Chair asked each if they accepted the nominations. All nominees responded in the
affirmative.
The Chair asked three times for further nominations. Being none, the Executive Committee
of the NVCA was declared by acclamation.
The members were allowed three minutes to address the Full Authority.
The Authority Executive Committee Members consist of:
Authority Chair:
Authority Vice-Chair:
Five Executive Committee Members:
Chris Carrier
Walter Benotto
Barry Ward
Ian Lang
Tom Elliott
George Sheffer
Bob Marrs
7. ROLE & RESPONSIBILITIES OF FULL AUTHORITY, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEES,
MUNICIPAL APPOINTED MEMBERS AND MEMBER EXPENSES AND
COMPENSATION
7.1 Advisory Committee Selection Process
The Chair made a request to postpone the advisory committee selection process
to the end of the meeting. All members were in favour (full consent).
5
FULL AUTHORITY ANNUAL MEETING MINUTES
NO. 1/05
14 JANUARY 2005
7.2 NVCA 2005-2007 Business Plan
RES. #14
MOVED BY: Ron Henderson
SECONDED BY: Mike McWilliam
RESOLVED THAT:
WHEREAS: NVCA Members of the Advisory Committees and the Executive Committee
have provided input into the development of the Draft 2005-2007 Business Plan for their
individual program areas; and,
WHEREAS: There is a need to ensure integration of the business plan between
program areas, and provide time for a full review; therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED: That the Full Authority receive the DRAFT NVCA 2005-2007
Business Plan dated January 2005 for review; and
FURTHERMORE: That the each Advisory Committee will review the entire business
plan at the February meeting to confirm the direction and integration of the 2005-2007
business plan.
Carried;
Councillor Brian Mullin left the meeting at 11 :08 a.m.
Councillor Gord Montgomery left the meeting at 11 :10 a.m.
7.3 Draft 2005 Budget
RES. #15
MOVED BY: Kathy Jeffery
SECONDED BY: Ruth Fountain
RESOLVED THAT:
WHEREAS: The NVCA membership on December 10, 2004, approved a strategic
Business Plan Financial Forecast for 2005; and,
WHEREAS: The draft NVCA 2005 Budget dated January 4, 2005, is consistent with the
direction of the Business Plan; therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED THAT: The NVCA approves the draft 2005 Budget for circulation to
our member municipalities for input and direction; and
FURTHERMORE: That on March 11, 2005 the NVCA Full Authority membership will
vote on the approval of the 2005 NVCA Budget as circulated.
A RECORDED VOTE WAS REQUESTED BY THE MEMBERS.
THE VOTE RECORDED 151N FAVOUR AND 7 AGAINST.
Carried;
6
FULL AUTHORITY ANNUAL MEETING MINUTES
NO. 1/05
14 JANUARY 2005
8. 2005 Borrowing Resolution:
RES. #16
MOVED BY: George Sheffer
SECONDED BY: Kathy Jeffery
RESOLVED THAT: For the fiscal 2005 year, the Nottawasaga Valley Conservation
Authority borrow, as required on credit, up to $450,000 for its purposes until payment to
the Authority of grants from the Province of Ontario, and levies from its member
municipalities are received.
Carried;
9. Appointment of 2005 Authority Solicitors:
RES. #17
MOVED BY: George Sheffer
SECONDED BY: Ruth Fountain
RESOLVED THAT: The firms of Stiver Vale Barristers, Solicitors, Notaries, and Hill
Hunter Losell Law Firm, be appointed to conduct the legal business of the Authority for
2005.
Carried;
10. Appointment of 2005 Authority Auditor:
RES. #18
MOVED BY: Ruth Fountain SECONDED BY: Kathy Jeffery
RESOLVED THAT: Resolved that: The firm of BDO Dunwoody be appointed to conduct
the auditing functions of the Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority for 2004 Fiscal
Year.
Carried;
11. Members 2005 Compensation and Mileage:
RES. #19
MOVED BY: Ron Henderson SECONDED BY: Kathy Jeffery
RESOLVED THAT: The member's compensation for the year 2005 remain at $59.40/per
meeting: and,
That: A traveling allowance of 40i per kilometre be paid for the round trip for necessary
traveling while conducting business of the Authority.
Carried;
7
tf
FULL AUTHORITY ANNUAL MEETING MINUTES
NO. 1/05
14 JANUARY 2005
12. 2005 Appointment of Representative to Conservation Ontario Council:
RES. #20
MOVED BY: Mike McWilliam SECONDED BY: Ron Henderson
RESOLVED THAT: Chris Carrier be appointed as the NVC.A. voting delegate on
the Conservation Ontario Council for the year 2005; and,
FURTHER THAT: Wayne R. Wilson, B.Sc., Chief Administrative Officer/Secretary-
Treasurer, be appointed as alternate.
Carried;
13. Freedom of Information and Privacy Act - NVCA 2005 Members
RES. #21
MOVED BY: Lynn Dollin
SECONDED BY: Ron Simpson
RESOLVED THAT: The individual N.V.CA members are required to give their
permission for the printing of their names, addresses and telephone/fax numbers/email
address, in accordance with the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of
Privacy Act.
Carried;
14. Department of Fisheries and Oceans Partnership Renewal for 2004-2005
RES. #21
MOVED BY: Bob Marrs
SECONDED BY: Lynn Dollin
RESOLVED THAT:
WHEREAS: The NVC.A. has completed 6 years of Level II Fish Habitat Partnership
Agreement with the DFO; and,
WHEREAS: There is a need to continue this agreement; therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED: That the N.V.CA endorses the extension of this agreement for the
period of October 16, 2004 to January 15, 2006.
8
FULL AUTHORITY ANNUAL MEETING MINUTES
NO. 1/05
14 JANUARY 2005
15. STAFF PRESENTATION
Bob Law, Watershed Planner provided an overview of the Draft Terms of Reference for
the Watershed Plan Strategic Review. The review is as a result of specific provincial
direction to adopt a watershed-based planning process led by the Ministry of the
Environment and by the Conservation Authorities. The first recommendation of that
direction is that "Drinking water sources should be protected by developing watershed
based source protection plans. Source protection plans should be required for all
watersheds in Ontario".
Discussion ensued. Several questions of clarification were addressed.
16. OTHER BUSINESS
None noted.
17. ADJOURNMENT
RES. #23
MOVED BY: Mary Brett
SECONDED BY: Bob Marrs
RESOLVED THAT: This meeting adjourn at 11 :50 a.m. to meet again at the call of the
Chair.
Carried;
Chris Carrier, Chair
Wayne R. Wilson, CAO/Secretary- Treasurer
9
PRESENT:
Chair
Vice Chair:
Members:
Chris Carrier
Walter Benotto
Mary Brett
Lynn Dollin
Tom Elliott
Wayman Fairweather
Ruth Fountain
Tony Guergis arrived at 9:35 a.m.
Ralph Hough
Kathy Jeffrey
Jennifer Lavoie
Bob Marrs
Garry Matthews
Ken McGhee
Mike McWilliam
Gord Montgomery
Brian Mullin
Michael Prowse
George Sheffer
Joan Sutherland
Barry Ward
Regrets: Orville Brown
Terry Dowdall
Ron Henderson
Ian Lang
Ron Simpson
STAFF PRESENT: CAO/Secretary-Treasurer
Manager of AdminlHuman Resources
Director of Engineering & Tech. Servo
Manager, Environmental Monitoring
Water Resource Technologist
GIS Analyst
Director of Planning
Senior Planner
Director of Land/Stewardship Servo
Manager, Stewardship Services
Forestry Program Coordinator
Healthy Waters Program Technologist
RECORDER: Administrative Assistant
Wayne Wilson
Susan Richards
Glenn Switzer
David Featherstone
Mike Dodd
Tina Desroches
Charles Burgess
Bev Booth
Byron Wesson
Fred Dobbs
Rick Grillmayer
Brian Morrison
Laurie Barron
FULL AUTHORITY ANNUAL MEETING MINUTES
NO. 2/05
11, FEBRUARY 2005
1. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER
Chris Carrier, Chair, called the meeting to order at 9:01 a.m.
2. ADOPTION OF AGENDA
RES. # 1
MOVED BY: Mike McWilliam
SECONDED BY: Mary Brett
RESOLVED THAT: The Agenda for Full Authority Meeting #2/05, dated 11 February
2005, be adopted as amended.
Carried;
ON TABLE REPORT RE: ASSIMILATIVE CAPACITY STUDY WAS PRESENTED TO THE
FULL AUTHORITY FOR THEIR REVIEW
2.1 CAO/Secretary-Treasurer
Assimilative Capacity Study - Need for further direction
RES. # 2
MOVED BY: George Sheffer
SECONDED BY: Gordon Montgomery
RESOLVED THAT: The Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority continue to fully
participate in the provincially funded joint, Lake Simcoe, Nottawasaga, Assimilative
Capacity Study and;
FURTHERMORE THAT: The NVCA staff work co-operatively with the LSRCA, Provincial
Agencies Municipalities and others to obtain assimilative capacity information for the four
streams in the Municipalities of Clearview, Collingwood, and Town of the Blue Mountains,
subject to available funding and therefore;
BE IT RESOLVED: That staff, actively work with all partners to ensure that the study is
completed with the highest scientific standards, to ensure defensible results.
Carried;
Discussion ensued regarding a request by the members to pass a further motion under
New Business which would address specific direction to be taken with respect to this issue.
(See item NO.1 0)
THE MEETING ADJOURNED TO BREAK INTO ADVISORY COMMITTEES AT
9:40 A.M.
Page 2 ofS
FULL AUTHORITY ANNUAL MEETING MINUTES
NO. 2/05
11, FEBRUARY 2005
3. THE FULL AUTHORITY RECONVENED AT 11:25 A.M.
4. PECUNIARY INTEREST
None were noted.
5. MINUTES
5.1 Minutes of the Full Authority Meeting 12/04, 14 January 2005.
RES # 3
MOVED BY: George Sheffer
SECONDED BY: Ruth Fountain
RESOLVED THAT: The Minutes of Full Authority Meeting 12/04, dated 14 January
2005, be approved.
Carried;
5.2 Minutes of Full Authority Meeting 1/05, 14 January 2005
RES # 4
MOVED BY: Ruth Fountain
SECONDED BY: George Sheffer
RESOLVED THAT: The Minutes of Full Authority Meeting 1/05, dated 14 January
2005, be approved.
Carried;
6. BUSINESS ARISING FROM MINUTES
None were noted.
Page 3 of8
FULL AUTHORITY ANNUAL MEETING MINUTES
NO. 2/05
11, FEBRUARY 2005
7. STAFF REPORTS
7.1.1 Advisory Committees
RES. # 5
MOVED BY: Wayman Fairweather SECONDED BY: Mike McWilliam
RESOLVED THAT: The Executive Committee become the Committee responsible to
review recommendations regarding Communication initiatives.
Carried;
RES. # 6
MOVED BY: Lynn Dollin
SECONDED BY: Mike McWilliam
RESOLVED THAT: The NVCA Full Authority supports the recommendation of the
Executive Committee regarding the 2005 Advisory Committee membership as attached.
Carried;
8. ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS - COMMUNICATION CORE
MESSAGE
8.1 LAND MANAGEMENT AND STEWARDSHIP SERVICES ADVISORY
COMMITTEE:
Communication - Core Message Recommendation revised to read:
"In partnership with the community, the Land and Water Stewardship Program for
the NVCA works on local projects that protect and restore our environment and
helps ensure the future of our healthy water. "
RES. # 7
MOVED BY: Joan Sutherland
SECONDED BY: Bob Marrs
WHEREAS: The Land Management & Stewardship Services Advisory Committee have
reviewed their Core Message at the meeting of February 11, 2005; and
WHEREAS: The Land Management & Stewardship Services Advisory Committee have
recommended the Core Program Message as amended; therefore
BE IT RESOLVED THAT: The Full Authority approves the recommended Core Message
as presented.
Carried;
Page 4 of8
FULL AUTHORITY ANNUAL MEETING MINUTES
NO. 2105
11, FEBRUARY 2005
8.2 ENGINEERING & TECHNICAL SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE:
Communication - Core Message Recommendation revised to read:
"The NVGA's Engineering and Technical Program provides science-based
support for land and water resources management including natural heritage
programs, as well as technical expertise to forecast and monitor floods and
erosion".
RES. # 8
MOVED BY: Ralph Hough SECONDED BY: Wayman Fairweather
WHEREAS: The Engineering & Technical Services Advisory Committee have reviewed
their Core Message at the meeting of February 11, 2005; and
WHEREAS: The Engineering & Technical Services Advisory Committee have
recommended the Core Program Message as amended; therefore
BE IT RESOLVED THAT: The Full Authority approves the recommended Core Message
as presented.
Carried;
8.3 PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Communication - Core Message Recommendation revised to read:
"The Planning Program provides professional planning expertise to conserve the
environment in a watershed based ecosystem through an open and responsible
approach. "
RES. # 9
MOVED BY: Wayman Fairweather SECONDED BY: Lynn Dollin
WHEREAS: The Planning Advisory Committee have reviewed their Core Message at
the meeting of February 11, 2005; and
WHEREAS: The Planning Advisory Committee have recommended the Core Program
Message as amended; therefore
BE IT RESOLVED THAT: The Full Authority approves the recommended Core
Message as presented.
Carried;
Page 50f8
FULL AUTHORITY ANNUAL MEETING MINUTES
NO. 2/05
11, FEBRUARY 2005
9. 2005-2007 BUSINESS PLAN REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION
9.1 Land and Water Advisory Committee Business Plan Recommendation was
deferred to the March 11, 2005 Full Authority Meeting.
9.2 Engineering and Technical Services Advisory Committee Business Plan
Recommendation voted on and passed.
9.3 Planning Advisory Committee Business Plan Recommendation
voted on and passed.
**Note: The Land and Water Stewardship Advisory Committee were unable to
discuss the Business Plan due to time constraints. The item was
deferred by the Full Authority to the next regular meeting on March 11,
2005.
10. NEW BUSINESS:
(a) Assimilative Capacity Study (see item 2.1)
RES. # 10
MOVED BY: Jennifer Lavoie
SECONDED BY: Walter Benotto
WHEREAS: The NVCA strongly supports the inclusion of the Black Ash Creek,
Pretty River, Silver Creek and the Batteaux River watersheds with the current
Assimilative Capacity Study Exercise; therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED: That the Chair, Vice Chair and CAO of the NVCA, be directed to
actively solicit support for inclusion of these water courses, with the Minister and
Deputy Minster of the Ontario Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, the Ministry
of the Environment and the Ministry of Natural Resources.
Carried unanimously;
(b) Councillor Mary Brett, Township of Adjala-Tosorontio, Full Authority
Representative requested a copy of the NVCA un-audited Statement of
Operations Summary for the 2004 Budget.
Page 6of8
FULL AUTHORITY ANNUAL MEETING MINUTES
NO. 2/05
11, FEBRUARY 2005
11. CORRESPONDENCE:
(a) Correspondence from Clearview Township dated Dec 22/04 re: Clarification of
Potential Implications of Assimilative Capacity Study and Intergovernmental
Action Plan on Ongoing Planning and Servicing Projects.
(b) Correspondence from Conservation Ontario dated Jan 11/04 re: "Federal
Government Promotes Strong Protection for Water in the Great Lakes/St.
Lawrence Basin".
(c) Correspondence from Credit Valley Conservation dated Jan 17/05 re: Pre-
Budget Consultation Hearings, Standing Committee on Finance and Economic
Affairs.
(d) Correspondence sent to the Water Policy Branch of the Ministry of the
Environment from Policy and Planning at Conservation Ontario dated Jan 28/05
re: Comments on Proposed Permit to Take Water Manual.
(e) Correspondence from the Town of Mono dated Feb 2/05 re: a Resolution
appointing Councillor Ken McGhee as Council's representative on the NVCA Full
Authority.
(f) Agenda for the Assimilative Capacity Study meeting LSRCA & NVCA to be held
on Feb 3/05.
RES. # 11
MOVED BY: Gordon Montgomery SECONDED BY: Barry Ward
RESOLVED THAT: The Correspondence not specifically dealt with be placed on file.
Carried;
12. In-Camera Session
RES. 12
MOVED BY: Barry Ward
SECONDED BY: Gordon Montgomery
RESOLVED THAT: This meeting of the Full Authority NO.02-05 go "In-Camera" at 11:49
a.m. to address matters pertaining to litigation or potential litigation, including matters
before administrative tribunals, affecting the Authority, the receiving of advice that is
subject to solicitor/client privilege, including communications necessary for that purpose,
and;
THAT: The following staff be in attendance: Wayne R. Wilson, Chief Administrative
Officer/Secretary-Treasurer, Susan Richards, Manager, Administration & Human
Resources and Byron Wesson, Director of Land Management & Stewardship Program.
Carried;
Page 7 of8
,
-' I
FULL AUTHORITY ANNUAL MEETING MINUTES
NO. 2/05
11, FEBRUARY 2005
13. FUTURE MEETINGS:
February 25, 2004 - Executive Committee
March 11, 2004 - Full Authority
April 15, 2004 - Full Authority 9:00 - 9:30
Advisory Committees 9:30 - Noon
14. ADJOURNMENT
RES. # 13
MOVED BY: Wayman Fairweather
SECONDED BY: Ralph Hough
RESOLVED THAT: This meeting of the Full Authority No. 02-05 come out of "In-
Camera" and adjourn at 12:36 to meet again at the call of the Chair.
Carried;
Chris Carrier, Chair
Wayne R. Wilson, CAO/Secretary- Treasurer
Page 8 of8
,
~~~
~
-
Present:
Councillor Roy Bridge, Chair
Councillor V. Hackson, Vice-Chair
Councillor P. Brown
Mr. E. Bull
Councillor G. Davidson
Councillor B. Drew
Councillor K. Ferdinands
Mayor R. Grossi
Councillor B. Huson
Councillor P. Marshall
Councillor M. Nanowski
Councillor J. Rupke
Regional Councillor S. Self
Mayor K. Shier
Councillor J. West
Regrets:
J. Dales, Honourary Member
G.R. Richardson, Honourary Member
Councillor Neil Snutch
Mayor R. Stevens
Mayor T. Taylor
Mayor J. Young
LAKE SIMCOE REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
MEETING NO. BOD-12-04
Friday January 28th, 2005 - 9:00 a.m
The Regional Municipality of York
17250 Yonge Street
Committee Room B
MINUTES
Staff:
D. Gayle Wood, CAO.lSecretary-Treasurer
M. Walters. Director, Watershed Management
R. Baldwin, Manager, Watershed Science
K. Kennedy, Manager, Planning
G. Casey, Recording Secretary
Others:
C. Musselman, LSRCA
R. Muzorewa, LSRCA
R. Regier, LSRCA
S. Morley, LSRCA
J. Wong, LSRCA
D. Campbell, LSRCA
K. Adams, LSRCA
E. Crossland, Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Foundation
L. Eveleigh, Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Foundation
Councillor D. Ramsarran, Town of Newmarket
Chair Bridge welcomed the Board to the first meeting of 2005.
DECLARATION OF PECUNIARY INTEREST
There was no declaration of pecuniary interest or general nature thereof.
.
g/~
'\ \
\JI
Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority
Board of Directors' Meeting
BOD-01-05 - IVllnutes
Page 2
January 28. 2005
II APPROVAL OF AGENDA
The CAO advised that staff have tabled a lengthy addition to the agenda which includes an updated
Budget Status Report for the period ending December 31, 2004, as well as various pieces of
correspondence. This was necessary due to the February meeting being the Annual General
Meeting and regular business is not dealt with at that time.
Councillor West advised that Item 20 of the agenda has been incorrectly placed on the agenda and
should be moved to "Other Business" as it deals with confidential land acquisition issues.
Moved by: M. Nanowski
Seconded by: J. West
BOD-05-001 RESOLVED THAT the content of the Agenda be approved as
amended to include the "Tabled Items and Other Business"
Agenda.
CARRIED
III ADOPTION OF MINUTES
(a) Board of Directors
Minutes of the Board of Directors' Meeting No. BOD-12-04, held on December10th, 2005.
Moved by: J. West
Seconded by: S. Self
BOD-05-002 RESOLVED THAT the minutes of the Board of Directors'
meeting No. BOD-12-04 be adopted as printed and circulated.
CARRIED
W ANNOUNCEMENTS
(a) Introduction of New Staff
The CAO introduced the following new staff members who have been hired with the Authority over
the past six months. Each individual provided the Board with a brief personal background on their
experience and qualifications.
Rob Reiger, Marketing and Communications Specialist
Krista Adams, Hydrogeologist
Janet Wong, Senior Planner
Carrie Musselman, Environmental Planner
Rosemary Muzorewa, Administrative Assistant to the CAO
Sandra Morley, Administrative Assistant, Watershed Management
Q)
/'\~
~)
\
J -
Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority
Board of Directors' Meeting
800-01-05 - Minutes
Paqe 3
January 28. 2005
(b) Lake Simcoe Reqion Conservation Foundation (LSRCF)
Lisa Eveleigh, Executive Director, LSRCF, provided the Board with a brief presentation on the
Foundation's new logo and new name and tag line, Lake Simcoe Conservation Foundation, Our
Lake Depends On Us.
Ernie Crossland, President, LSRCF, spoke to the Board regarding the 2005 Conservation Dinner
which will be held on Friday, April 15'h, 2005 at DiNardo's in Aurora. Mr. Crossland indicated that
the tickets are limited and encouraged the Board to request their tickets early. Tickets are $100.00
each for which a charitable tax receipt can be issued.
V PRESENTATIONS
(a) Natural HeritaQe MappinQ
The Manager, Watershed Science, delivered a brief presentation on the Natural Heritage Mapping
which has now been completed for the entire Lake Simcoe Watershed. A sample map was tabled
for each Member. A discussion ensured based on several questions by the Board.
Currently the Authority does not have forest cover targets, however the York Green Strategy
identifies a target of 25% and the provincial target for a healthy watershed is 35%. It is expected that
the Authority will lean toward the 35% forest coverage target.
Staff advised that it is not expected that there will be any proposed changes regarding land use
designation as a result of the Nutrient Management Act.
The CAO indicated that the Nutrient Management Act is separate from the Natural Hazard Mapping
and offered to bring a Staff Report to a future meeting which will provide more information. The
Board requested a Staff Report regarding the Nutrient Management Act be placed on the March
agenda.
The Board was advised that the Natural Hazard Mapping will be made available to all watershed
municipalities for use with their GIS.
The Chair and the CAO extended congratulations to the Manager, Watershed Science and his team
for all of the hard work put into this initiative.
Moved by: J. West
Seconded by: V. Hackson
800-05-003 RESOLVED THAT the presentation and verbal update
regarding the Authority's Natural Heritage Mapping initiative
be received for information.
CARRIED
! j
/ I
Q)
Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority
Board of Directors' Meeting
80D-01-05 - Minutes
Page 4
January 28, 2005
VI DETERMINATION OF ITEMS REQUIRING SEPARATE DISCUSSION
Items 4, 15, 16, 18 and 19 of the Agenda were identified for discussion.
VII ADOPTION OF ITEMS NOT REQUIRING SEPARATE DISCUSSION
Moved by: J. West
Seconded by: P. Marshall
BOD-05-004 RESOLVED THAT the following recommendations respecting
the matters listed as "Items Not Requiring Separate
Discussion" be adopted as submitted to the Board and Staff
be authorized to take all necessary action required to give
effect to same.
1. Fill. Construction & Alteration to Waterways Applications
BOD-05-005 RESOLVED THAT applications under Section 28 of the
Conservation Authorities Act and Ontario Regulation 153/90,
as amended by Ontario Regulations 534/91 and 623/94, be
received and approved.
2. Correspondence
BOD-05-006 RESOLVED THAT the letter received from Mr. Garfield
Dunlop, MPP, thanking the Authority for providing him
with a copy of the resolution passed by the City of
Orillia regarding the cormorant populations in Lake
Simcoe be received.
3. Correspondence
BOD-05-007 RESOLVED THAT the letter dated December 16, 2004,
received from Mr. Murray Brown regarding the issuance
of Permit No. GP 2004.101 as well as the Authority's
Board Resolution No. BOD-04-267 be received.
5. Correspondence
BOD-05-008 RESOLVED THAT the letter dated November 25, 2004,
from Mr. John S. Burke, Deputy Minister, Ministry of
Municipal Affairs and Housing, which is follow up
correspondence to the November 16'", 2004, meeting
regarding the proposed south Simcoe Inter-governmental
Action Plan be received.
\J)
Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority
Board of Directors' Meeting
BOD-01-05 . Minutes
Page 5
6. Correspondence
BOD-05-009 RESOLVED THAT the letter dated November 24, 2004,
from Ms. Micheline Riopelle, Ministry of the Environment,
confirming the approval of funding in the amount of $1.5
million for the acceleration of the Lake Simcoe
Environmental Management Strategy and for the study to
determine the assimilative capacity of the Lake Simcoe
and Nottawasaga watershed be received.
7, Correspondence
BOD-05-010 RESOLVED THAT the letter dated November 23, 2004,
from the County of Simcoe advising that Council received
the Authority's resolution regarding the Greenbelt Task
Force - Advice and Recommendations, for information be
received.
8. Correspondence
BOD-05-011 RESOLVED THAT the letter dated November 19, 2004,
from the Township of Brock advising that their Planning
Committee passed a resolution supporting, in principle,
the draft Drinking Water Source Protection Act and the
role proposed for the conservation authorities be
received.
9, Correspondence
BOD-05-012 RESOLVED THAT the letter dated November 29, 2004,
from Ms. Anita Beaton thanking the Authority for the
recognition given to her through the project updates, a
News Release, as well as the nomination for the
Authority's Water Conservation Award be received.
10, Correspondence
BOD-05-013 RESOLVED THAT the letter dated November 19, 2004,
from the Town of Georgina which provides a resolution
passed by their Council regarding The Wave program and
requests that the Authority endorses and supports this
program be received; and
FURTHER THAT the Town of Georgina be advised that
the Authority does support and endorse The Wave
Program.
,.-
i-,
--'
January 28.2005
~~
. '\ )
~
Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority
Board of Directors' Meeting
BOD-01-05 - Minutes
Page 6
/
January 28. 2005
11. Correspondence
800-05-014 RESOLVED THAT the letters of support received from
watershed municipalities regarding the "Re-investment in
Ontario's Conservation Authorities", be received.
12. Correspondence
800-05-015 RESOLVED THAT the letter dated December 2, 2004, from
The Honourable David Ramsay, Minister of Natural
Resources regarding the 80ard's resolution to endorse
the Provincial Transfer Payment Review Report be
received.
13. Monthlv Communications Update
800-05-016 RESOLVED THAT the Monthly Communications Update,
for the period December 1" to 31.', 2004, be received for
information.
17. Chair's Report - 2004 Activities
800-05-017 RESOLVED That Chair's Report No. 04-05-800 regarding
2004 activities of the Authority's Chair be received for
information.
VIII HEARINGS
There were no hearings scheduled for this meeting.
IX DELEGA TlONS
There were no delegations scheduled for this meeting.
X CONSIDERA TlON OF ITEMS REQUIRING SEPARA TE DISCUSSION
OJ
Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority
Board of Directors' Meeting
BOO-01-05 - Minutes
Page 7
January 28, 2005
4, Correspondence
Councillor Nanowski requested clarification on the timelines for the completion of the Assimilative
Capacity Studies.
The CAO advised that the studies must be completed by the end of 2005, One meeting regarding
the Assimilative Capacity Studies has been held and a second meeting of the Steering Committee
is scheduled for February 3", 2005.
The CAO requested permission from the Board to work with the Chair to expedite the hiring of
consultants for these studies. Having to work within the current Authority's Purchasing Policy for this
process will create serious delays in the completion of these studies,
Moved by:
Seconded by:
M, Nanowski
P. Brown
BOD-05-018
RESOLVED THAT the letter dated December 15, 2004,
received from The Honourable John Gerretsen, Minister of
Municipal Affairs and Housing regarding the
Intergovernmental action plan for south Simcoe County be
received.
CARRIED
Moved by: J. West
Seconded by: K. Shier
BOD-05-019 RESOLVED THAT the Chair and CAO approve the consultant
selection process for the Assimilative Capacity Studies and
provide updates to the Board of Directors.
CARRIED
14. BudQet Status Report
A revised copy of Staff Report No. 01-05-BOD was tabled at the meeting which provided an update
regarding the Authority's Budget Status for the period ending December 31",2004.
The report reflected that the Authority will have a budget surplus of $110,000. The report also
recommended where this surplus should be directed.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
J. West
P. Marshall
BOD-05-20
RESOLVED THAT Staff Report No. 01-05-BOD regarding the
Authority's Budget Status for the period ending December
31", 2004, be received for information and approved.
CARRIED
(~
UI
Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority
Board of Directors' Meeting
BOD-01-05 - Minutes
Paoe 8
January 28. 2005
15. Lake Simcoe Conservation Authority's
Watershed Development Policies Revisions
The Board dealt with Staff Report No. 02-05-BOD regarding proposed revisions to the Authority's
Watershed Development Policy.
The Board inquired if subsidence will be taken into account considering what has taken place over
the years in the Holland Marsh since Hurricane Hazel.
Staff advised that subsidence is being taken into account however the access roads within the
Holland Marsh have not changed substantially and that subsidence is happening more in the fields.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
V. Hackson
P. Brown
BOD-05-021
RESOLVED THAT Staff Report No. 02-05-BOD regarding the
Watershed Development Policy Update be approved; and
THAT staff be directed to revise the Authority's Watershed
Development Policies; and
FURTHER THAT once revised, the policy and Staff Report No.
02-05-BOD be forwarded to our member municipalities.
CARRIED
16. Official Plan Amendments - County of Simcoe and
the Town of Bradford West Gwillimbury-Bond Head Development Corp.
The Board dealt with Staff Report No. 03-05-BOD which provides Authority comments regarding
Official Plan Amendments to the County of Simcoe and the Town of Bradford West Gwillimbury-
Bond Head Development Corporation.
Staff confirmed that most of the identified area is outside the Green Belt Plan and that the LSRCA
will continue to work closely with the Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority to consolidate
comments. Both authorities have met with the proponent and have requested that both authorities
be represented at all meetings relating to this matter.
The Board inquired if there are any policies which can protect the trees from being cut down within
the seven woodlots in the identified area. Board Members suggested that the municipality review
their tree by-law and further advised that Simcoe County has a tree by-law which should also be
consulted.
Moved by: J. West
Seconded by: S. Self
BOD-05-022 RESOLVED THAT Staff Report No. 03-05-BOD regarding a
proposed Official Plan Amendment to the County of Simcoe
and the Town of Bradford West Gwillimbury by the Bond Head
Development Corporation be received for information.
CARRIED
r)1
~
Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority
Board of Directors' Meeting
BOD-01-05 . Minutes
Paae 9
January 28, 2005
18. Board of Directors' - Per Diem and Mileaqe
The Board dealt with Staff Report No. 05-05-BOD regarding the Per Diems and Mileage for the
Authority's Board of Directors.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
R. Grossi
K. Shier
BOD-05-023
RESOLVED THAT the Staff Report No. 05-05-BOD regarding
the Board of Directors' Per Diems and Mileage be received for
information and approved.
CARRIED
19. Health of Lake Simcoe - Mavor's Forum
The Board dealt with Staff Report No. 06-05-BOD regarding the Health of Lake Simcoe Mayor's
Forum held on December 3", 2004.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
J. West
R. Grossi
BOD-05-024
RESOLVED THAT Staff Report No. 06-05-BOD regarding the
Health of Lake Simcoe Mayor's Forum be received, approved
and forwarded to the watershed municipalities for their
information; and
FURTHER THAT the Staff Report be forwarded to the Lake
Simcoe Environmental Management Strategy Steering
Committee for their response.
CARRIED
21. Correspondence
The Board dealt with correspondence received from the Town of Aurora regarding Resolution No.
C-2004-0571 from the Town of Georgina re Health of Lake Simcoe Watershed. The Town of Aurora
requested that the Authority's Board deal wHh this item and provide further information.
Moved by: J. West
Seconded by: G. Davidson
BOD-05-025 RESOLVED THAT the resolution from the Town of Aurora
regarding the Health of Lake Simcoe Watershed be received;
and
FURTHER THAT Staff Report No. 06-05-BOD regarding this
matter be forwarded to the Town of Aurora for their
consideration.
CARRIED
~
Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority
Board of Directors' Meeting
BOD-01-05 - Minutes
Paqe 10
January 28, 2005
22. Correspondence
The Board dealt with correspondence received from the Town of Aurora regarding Resolution No.
R.18-2004 from the Town of Newmarket re the Rescue Lake Simcoe Coalition's Wave, Heathy
Yards, Healthy Waters Program. The Town of Aurora is asking that the Authority's Board deal with
this item and provide further Information.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
M. Nanowski
R. Grossi
BOO-05-026
RESOL VEO THAT Resolution No. R.18-2004 from the Town of
Aurora regarding the Rescue Lake Simcoe Coalition's Wave,
Heathy Yards, Healthy Waters Program be received; and
FURTHER THAT the Town of Aurora be advised that the
LSRCA has supported the Coalition's WAVE project through
staff support.
CARRIED
23. Correspondence
The Board dealt with correspondence received from the Town of Aurora regarding Report LS04-
061 regarding Green Roof Technology which is being submitted to the LSRCA for comment on the
advantages of Green Roof Technology In reducing the impact of storm water management pond
requirements.
Moved by: J. West
Seconded by: V. Hackson
BOO-05-027 RESOLVED THAT Report LS04-061 regarding Green Roof
Technology from the Town of Aurora be received; and
FURTHER THAT this report be referred to Authority staff for
consideration and report to the Board
CARRIED
24. Correspondence
The Board dealt with email correspondence from Pat and Jim Woodford and also with the CAO's
response to this email.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
P. Marshall
M. Nanowski
BOO-05-028
RESOL VED THA Tthe email correspondence from Pat and Jim
Woodford be received for information.
CARRIED
~
Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority
Board of Directors' Meeting
BOD-01-05 - Minutes
Page 11
January 28, 2005
25. Correspondence
The Board dealt with correspondence received from the Town of Bradford West Gwlllimbury
advising that they will not participate in the Scanlon Dam Safety Review Study.
Moved by: G. Davidson
Seconded by: K. Ferdinands
BOD-05-029 RESOLVED THAT the correspondence received from the
Town of Braaford West Gwillimbury advising that they will not
participate in the Scanlon Dam Safety Review Study be
received.
CARRIED
26. Correspondence
The Board dealt with a copy of correspondence from the City of Kawartha Lakes addressed to The
Hon. David Ramsay, Minister of Natural Resources, advising that their Council does not support the
position of Conservation Ontario regarding Source Protection Planning.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
S. Self
G. Davidson
BOD-05-030
RESOLVED THAT the correspondence from the City of
Kawartha Lakes addressed to The Hon. David Ramsay,
Minister of Natural Resources, advising that their Council
does not support the position of Conservation Ontario
regarding Source Protection Planning be received.
CARRIED
27. Correspondence
The Authority received letters from Laurie Scott, MPP - Haliburton-Victoria-Brock, John O'Toole,
MPP - Durham, Town of Innisfil, Town of East Gwillimbury and the City of Barrie, acknowledging
the Authority's correspondence regarding the request for an extension to the Greenbelt Protection
Act
Moved by: J. West
Seconded by: P.Marshall
BOD-05-031 RESOLVED THAT the letters from Laurie Scott, MPP -
Haliburton-Victoria-Brock, John O'Toole, MPP -Durham, Town
of Innisfil, Town of East Gwillimbury and the City of Barrie,
acknowledging the Authority's correspondence regarding the
request for an extension to the Greenbelt Protection Act, be
received.
CARRIED
/
-
J)
Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority
Board of Directors' Meeting
BOD-01-05 - Minutes
Paqe 12
January 28, 2005
28. Correspondence
The Authority received a letter from the City of Orillia acknowledging receipt of correspondence
regarding the Re-investment in Ontario's Conservation Authority and advised that no action was
taken by their Planning Department and Environmental Advisory Committee.
Moved by: M. Nanowski
Seconded by: J, West
BOD-05-032 RESOLVED THAT the letter from the City of Orillia
acknowledging receipt of correspondence regarding the Re-
investment in Ontario's Conservation Authority and advised
that no action was taken by their Planning Department and
Environmental Advisory Committee be received.
CARRIED
XI OTHER BUSINESS
(a) Next Meetinq
The CAO advised that the next meeting of the Authority's Board of Directors will be held on Friday,
February 25th, 2005, and will be the Annual General Meeting. The Board will elect a Chair, Vice
Chair, and representatives to serve on the Administrative Committee.
(b) Conservation Ontario
Vice Chair Virigina Hackson extended thanks to the Chair and CAO for the invitation to attend the
December 2004 meeting of Conservation Ontario Council which was very informative.
(c) Farm Workers - Seasonal Accommodation
Mayor Grossi requested assistance from the Conservation Authority regarding this issue. The CAO
advised that staff will prepare a report for the Board at their March 2005 meeting for discussion.
(d) Phosphorus Loadinq to Lake Simcoe
Councillor Dennis Ramsarran, Town of Newmarket, was in attendance at the meeting and was
given the opportunity to ask a question of the LSRCA Board and staff regarding phosphorus
loadings to Lake Simcoe.
Councillor Ramsarran inquired what, if anything, is being done to address the producers of
phosphorus? He suggested requesting the federal and provincial government to apply stronger
restrictions on products containing phosphorus.
Staff responded that everyone must comply with the legislation through the Ministry of the
Environment. However, a lot of the phosphorus going into Lake Simcoe is coming from non-point
sources. It is expected that the Nutrient Management Act will address this. The Authority continues
to work with the municipalities in looking at stormwater management which is a huge contributort.
JJ
Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority
Board of ~irectors' Meeting
BOO-01-05 - Minutes
Paqe 13
January 28, 2005
Moved by:
Seconded by:
p, Marshall
V. Hackson
BOD-05-032
RESOL VED THAT the Authority's Board of Directors move to
"Closed Session" to deal with confidential land acquisition
issues.
CARRIED
Moved by: G, Davidson
Seconded by: J, West
BOD-05-033 RESOLVED THAT the Authority's Board of Directors rise from
"Closed Session" and report their progress.
CARRIED
20. Beaver River Wetland Land ACQuisition
The Board dealt with Confidential Staff Report No. 07 -05-BOO regarding the Beaver River Wetland
Land Acquisition Project - Offer to Purchase.
Moved by:
Seconded by:
R. Grossi
K. Shier
BOO-04-34
RESOLVED THAT Confidential Staff Report No. 07-05-BOO
regarding offer to purchase land within the Beaver River Land
Acquisition Project Area be received for information; and
FURTHER that staff proceed with the completion of the
purchase property subject to the approval of funds from the
Nature Conservancy of Canada.
CARRIED
XII ADJOURNMENT
Next meeting is scheduled for February 25'h, 2005,
Meeting adjourned at 10:20 a.m. on a motion by Councillor Jack Rupke.
,.9
I
D. Gayle Wood, CMM III
Chief Administrative Officer/
Secretary-Treasurer
CARRIED
Roy ridge
Chair
,
)
MIDLAND PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD MEETING
Page 1 of 4
DATE: February ]0,2005 LOCATION: Midland Public Library Boardroom
PRESENT: G.A. Walker, C. Moore, A. Wilkes, A. Campbell, R. Allard, B. Trounce, Oz Parsons, B Desroches
REGRETS: 1. Swick
STAFF: G. Griffith, Recording Secretary, B. Molesworth, CEO
ITEM
#
ISSUE
ACTION
1. Call to order
G.A. Walker called the meeting to order at 7:0] p.m.
2. Approval of the agenda
Additions:
8.2 Correspondence
Federation of Ontario Public Libraries
Moved by: A. Wilkes
Seconded by: B. Desroches
That the agenda be approved as amended.
CARRIED
3. Approval of the minutes of the previous meeting
Moved by: C. Moore
Seconded by: R. Allard
That the minutes of the Board meeting held on January 13,2005 be approved. CARRIED
4. Business arising from the minutes
4.1 Budget Presentation
B. Molesworth and A. Campbell presented the budget to Council on
January 26'h Overall, the budget is difficult for the Town this year.
R. A]]ard said he felt the Library budget was we]] received, however,
there may be a call to scale back.
5. Approval of the accounts
Due to the ongoing phase-in of the Town of Midland's new financial software,
the Cheque Register and Accounts were unavailable. They are hopeful that
everything will be running smoothly by March. The approval of the accounts
was deferred to the March lO'h meeting
+.,+.,.."'~,--_. .+---
RECIIVED I
I
I
I
OR -MEDONTE I,'
T:>WNSHIP
, ~R 7 ) 2005
MIDLAND PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD MEETING
DA TE: February] 0, 2005
LOCA TION: Midland Public Library Boardroom
.
/ )-
Page 2 of 4
ITEM
#
ISSUE
ACTION
6. Reports of Board Committees
6.1 Finance Committee - Art Campbell, Chairman
There was no report due to the lack of Financial Statements.
6.2 Strategic Planning Committee - J. Swick, Chairman
B. Molesworth distributed a draft of a new five year Strategic Plan for th
Board's approval. B. Trounce reported for the Committee in J. Swick's
absence and drew the Board's attention to the various parts of the Plan
The re-written preamble was well received and it was agreed that the
previous mission statement and motto adopted in 200 I be kept.
O. Parsons suggested that the Strategic Plan could look better if it was
produced professionally with the inclusion of some photos and would
like more time to look at the document B. Molesworth expressed the
wish to present the new Strategic Plan to Council before the end of
February A. Wilkes stated that since the Board had seen the Plan at a
previous meeting that it should move ahead. There was a suggestion
that some copies be made available at the main desk
Moved by: B. Trounce
Seconded by: A Wilkes
That the Board approve the new Strategic Plan 2005 - 2010.
B. Molesworth hopes to make the presentation to Council at their February 2S'h
meeting. He will ask 1 Swick, Chairman of the Strategic Planning Committee
to attend, if not B. Trounce will represent the Committee.
6.3 Fundraising Committee - O. Parsons, Chairman
o Parsons explained that due to the recent sale of his business he has
not had time to move forward with his fundraising plan and as a result
has nothing to report. B. Molesworth has heard from Rod Lavery from
SOLS and he has offered to meet with the Committee in the future
CARRIED
.
MIDLAND PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD MEETING
DATE: February 10, 2005
LOCA TION: Midland Public Library Boardroom
J
,
Page 3 of 4
ITEM
#
ISSUE
ACTION
6. Reports of Board Committees - continued
6.4 Policy committee - R. Allard, Chairman
R. Allard reported that at a recent meeting the Committee started looking
at the Operating Policies of the Library. He explained that they had
decided to revisit the Internet Policy first as it seemed to be the most
pressing. R Trounce stated that due to the age of the two older policy
documents the Committee is comparing, there isn't any mention of
Internet. B. Molesworth has distributed sample Internet policies from
other Libraries for the Committee to examine before they meet again.
Staff need a weJI defined policy that they can easily explain to the public.
6.5 Report from the Friends of the Midland Public Library
B. Molesworth and the Friends met to discuss the date of the
DinneriDance. There had been a conflict with the Museum's dinner
being held the same night, however, the Museum has now changed
their date to April 30th The Library dinner/dance wiJI be held May 7th
Posters and tickets are being printed and publicity has been sent out.
O. Parsons offered to help with ticket sales. The Friends have ordered
pewter pins of the Library as a I 25th anniversary fundraiser.
7. New business
7.1 Tiny Township Contract
B. Molesworth reviewed the current contract with Tiny Township and
reported on his discussions with the Penetanguishene Library about
re-negotiating the service contract. A letter has been sent to Tiny
Council from the three libraries with which they contract, informing
them of the intention to have a new contract in place for 2006.
The plan is for the CEOs and Finance Chairs of each Library Board to
meet and agree on a new formula to be presented to Tiny Township
Council in September 2005. After a thorough discussion, G.A. Walker
asked for the Board's direction It was agreed that B. Molesworth
should move forward with meeting the other Library Boards in order to
come up with some consensus around a new and fair formula.
MIDLAND PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD MEETING
DATE: February 10, 2005
LOCA TION: Midland Public Library Boardroom
ITEM
#
ISSUE
8. Information
8.1 Chief Librarian's Report
A Wilkes asked about what happened to music CDs being weeded from
the collection. B. Molesworth stated that they have been kept in storage
for a period of time but have been available to circulate, however,
there have not been many requests. They will likely be put into this
year's book sale.
8.2 Correspondence
- Letter from Federation of Ontario Public Libraries
The founding of the new Federation of Ontario Public Libraries took
place at the recent Ontario Library Association's Super Conference in
Toronto Its objectives are advocacy, marketing, research and consortia
purchasing on behalf of 160 public libraries serving more than
8 million Ontarions.
9. Adjournment
Moved by: A. Campbell
That the meeting be adjourned at 8: 15 p. ill.
d(lJ(((JflrJ h)
Chairman of the BOa/'d
Page 4 of 4
ACTION
I
Oro-Medonte History Association
Meeting Minutes, 31 January 2005
Members in attendance:
Sheila Kirkland
J adeen Henderson
Allan Howard
Bruce Wiggins
Geoffrey Booth
Councilor Ruth Fountain
\Ocl.-\
Meeting called to order at 7:30 p.m.
Errors/omissions/adoption of 11 January minutes: NONE
MOTION: That II January minutes be accepted as circulated. MOVED by Bruce,
SECONDED by Jadeen. PASSED.
Business Arising/Updates:
. Medonte Book Presentations - Geoff reported that emails have been sent to all
councilors and responses are forthcoming. Presentations are planned for the week
of Feb. 14-18. Discussion that Rogers Cable be contacted re: presentation at W.
R. Best Public School. Geoff will arrange.
. PowerPoint presentation 20 February at Simcoe County Museum (2 p.m.?). Allan
and Geoff should be able to attend. Allan and J adeen will meet to record
voiceover for the slides.
. Doors Open Huronia - Sheila has forwarded requested information. No new
correspondence to date.
. Kith 'n' Kin - Sheila has located some original notes and information. Jadeen
forwarded new family information for future updates. Discussion ensued as to
how book will be reprinted. Jadeen also reported that a copy of Kith 'n' Kin in
good condition is available, at an approximate cost of $30. MOVED by Bruce,
SECONDED by Allan, that Jadeen purchase this copy at this approximate cost.
PASSED.
. Collingwood Museum Trip - discussion deferred until May.
. Road Rally - Bruce circulated plans for the event, to be held 28 May at the
Guthrie Arena. Discussion ensued about sponsorship, volunteer duties and
logistics. Tickets will be priced at $30. Sheila reported that the Township's
Spring Parks and Rec brochure can be used to advertise the event. Other possible
places might include Georgian College Capsule, North Simcoe News, The
Hawkster and various Township publications.
. Oro African Church - Hours of operation will be Sundays in July and August,
from 1-4 p.m.
. Photo albums - deferred to future meeting.
. Black History events - Jadeen reported that there is no information available at
this time regarding this matter.
2
6.-
New Business/Correspondence
. Sheila reported that the Springwater Heritage Committee has invited us to attend a
tour of the HiIIsdale Jail on either 24 May, or 28 June. Decided to attend 24 May.
. Sheila also reported that she received a call from the Ontario Provincial Police,
Orillia GHQ, to give a talk on Black history. She will contact re: specifics of talk
and report back.
. Geoff circulated receipt-based Association expenditures statement for 2004.
Discussion ensued about expenses and income not on the list. Sheila will contact
Township on this matter.
Next meeting Wednesday, 16 February 2005, 7 p.m. at the Northway restaurant.
ORO-MEDONTE COMMUNITY POLICING COMMITTEE
"FOREVER VIGILANT"
P.O. BOX 100, ORO, ONTARIO lOl 2XO
a.p.p. EXTENDED SERVICES OFFICE · TELEPHONE: (705) 835.5190
March 12, 2005
Dear Mayor, Oro-Medonte Council and Staff,
The Oro-Medonte Community Policing Committee would like to
take this opportunity to extend an open invitation to our
next business meeting to be held Monday April 11th at 7:30.
We will be meeting in the Ian Beard Community Room at the OPP
office on the 4th line. This will be the last business
meeting of our term. It will offer an opportunity to meet
members of our newly organized COP (Citizens On Patrol)
program and have any questions answered regarding its
formation and functioning.
Si}tc!=rely,
,
,
f
,
\
\
\
Be rley Hubat ch
Oro-Medonte Community Policing Committee
'iiiI'
Opp
III
..
\ (j e..
rRtC"ElVED
MAR ! 3 200~
ORO-MEDONTE
TOWNSHIP
"
(,,'0
115 Hurontario Street
3rd Floor, P.O. Box 130
Collingwood, Ontario
L9Y3Z4
M~~i;\, ~~, ~Q;Q~PIY Foe The AtlecYotl Of
S. E. Martin, B.BA, CA
Gaviller & Company llP
-CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS-
Telephone 705/445-2020
Fax 705/444-5833
Email collingwood@gaviller.on.ca
The Council Members
Township of Oro-Medonte
Administration Centre
148 Line 7 S., Box 100
Oro, Ontario
LOL 2XO
lfEC-EIVED
\~-I
MAR 1 8 1005
ORO-MEOONTE
TOWNSHIP
Dear Sirs:
We have been engaged to audit the consolidated financial statements of Township of Oro-
Medonte (the "Municipality") for the year ending December 31, 2004.
Canadian generally accepted auditing standards (GAAS) require that we communicate at least
annually with you regarding all relationships between the Municipality and us that, in our
professional judgement, may reasonably be thought to bear on our independence. In
determining which relationships to report, these standards require us to consider relevant rules
and related interpretations prescribed by the appropriate provincial institutelordre and
applicable legislation, covering such matters as:
a) holding a financial interest, either directly or indirectly, in a client;
b) holding a position, either directly or indirectly, that gives the right or responsibility to
exert significant influence over the financial or accounting policies of a client;
c) personal or business relationships of immediate family, close relatives, partners,
either directly or indirectly, with a client;
d) economic dependence on a client; and
e) provision of services in addition to the audit engagement.
We have prepared the following comments to facilitate our discussions with you regarding
independence matters.
We are not aware of any relationships between the Municipality and us that, in our professional
judgement, may reasonably be thought to bear on our independence which have occurred from
January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2004.
GAAS requires that we confirm our independence to the Council Members. However, since the
Rules of Professional Conduct of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Ontario deal with the
concept of independence in terms of objectivity, our confirmation is to be made in that context.
Accordingly, we hereby confirm that we are objective with respect to the Municipality within the
meaning of the Rules of Professional Conduct of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of
Ontario as of February 24, 2005.
This report is intended solely for the use of the Council Members, management and others
within the Municipality and should not be used for any other purposes.
Owen Sound
Colilngwood y
,Walkerton
Meaford
1.
,
"
(>0
\()~ -')
We look forward to discussing with you the matters addressed in this letter as well as other
matters that may be of interest to you. We will be prepared to answer any questions you may
have regarding our independence as well as other matters.
Yours very truly
GAVILLER & COMPANY LLP
Per: /~j':-
2.
reI: 905-895-1281
1-800-465-0437
'ax: 905-853-5881
~Mail: info@lsrca.on.ca
Web: www.lsrca.on.ca
120 Bayview Parkway
Box 282
'ewmarket, Ontario
l3Y 4X1
Watershed
March 16, 2005
Ms. Marilyn Pennycook
Clerk
Township of Oro-Medonte
148 Line 7 S., Box 100
Oro, ON LOL 2XO
Dear Ms. Pennycook,
RECEIVED \
\
\
I
MAR 2 9 100S
ORO-MEDONTE
TOWNSHIP
\(j~
Re: Proclamation Request - May 15-21,2005, "Conservation Week"
This will acknowledge reeeipt of correspondenee dated February 28'\ 2005, addressed to Mr.
Murray J. Martin, Orillia Fish and Game Conservation Club, regarding the above.
On behalfofthe Authority's Board of Directors and staff, please be advised that we fully endorse
the motion contained in this correspondence and further advise that thc Authority, through our
various conservation programs, in particular the Burl's Creek project, will continue to contribute
to a healthier d cleaner environment.
/glc
c:
Mr. Murray 1. Martin, Orillia Fish and Game Conservation Club
Mr. M. Walters, Ms. S. Hanson, Mr. G. Davis, Mr. Brian Kemp, LSRCA
Mr. W. Wilson, CAO, NVCA
Mr. K. Sherman, Severn Sound EnvironmentaJ Association
N;=;~~
~':-_~~~~4r~"
~!.r'
'.,,,,-,,,,
~.~-:/r-
\'lQ - I
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
REPORT
DEPT. REPORT NO.: TO: COUNCIL PREPARED BY:
EES2005-13 Keith Mathieson
SUBJECT: DEPARTMENT:
COUNCIL:
Annual Compliance Report - Engineering and
Robincrest Water Supply Environmental Services
C.OFW.: and Treatment - 2004
DATE:
MOTION #: March 24, 2005
DATE: R. M. FILE NO.:
E05-14518
-
~BACKGROUND:
Section 4 of the Certificate of Approval issued to the Township of Oro-Medonte requires a written
report detailing compliance with all terms and conditions of the approval to be completed annually.
This Report is to be signed by a person designated by Council of the municipality that owns the works
and a resolution is to be presented to Council that the Compliance Report has been received.
The Compliance Report was due to be completed by March 31, 2005 and available for inspection by
any member of the public without charge.
-
IANALYSIS: '"
Attached is the Annual Compliance Report for 2004 for the Robincrest Water Supply System, a copy
of which has been submitted to the Ministry of the Environment. This Report is being made available
to Council for information and confirmation that Ontario Regulation #170103 has been complied with
by the Township of Ora-Medonte, and identifies any non-compliance issues and actions required.
\J.GI -
-
I RECOMMENDATlON(S):
1. THAT Report #EES2005-13 be received and adopted.
2. AND THAT Council receives the Annual Compliance Report for 2004 for the Robincrest Water
Supply System.
Re'POC~;fied
Keith Mathieson
Director of Engineering and Environmental Services
THE CORPORATION OFTHE
\
148 Line 7 S., Box tOO
Ora, Ontario LOL 2XO
TOWN8tIIP
r!J~Of7#6~
Phone (705) 487.2171
fax (705) 487.0133
www.oro-medonte.c,o.,
March 24, 2005
Ministry of the Environment
54 Cedar Pointe Drive
Unit #1201
BARRIE, Ontario
L4N 5R7
Re: Robincrest Water Supply and Treatrnent System
Annual Compliance Report for 2004
Robincrest Water System supplies 136 homes and the Moonstone Public School with
water from two (2) ground water source wells.
Permit to Take Water Renewal #77-P-3033, issued to the Township of Oro-Medonte,
authorizes the withdrawal of water from Well #1, expiring Septernber 15, 2010.
Perrnit to Take Water #98-P-1031 , issued to Bachly Investrnents Inc., authorizes the
withdrawal of water from Well #2, expiring March 31,2008.
The withdrawal of water is not to exceed 576 m3, per day, for Well #1 and 850 m3, per
day, for Well #2.
Certificate of Approval #1895-5C6QT5, Section 1.3, requires that the water treatment
plant is operated to treat water at a rate not to exceed the maximum flow rate of 850 m3
per day.
WATER QUANTITY
Schedules have been attached showing the "average daily flow" per month and the
"rnaximum daily flow" per month, and the maximum flow of treated water to the
distribution system for the Robincrest system. At no time during 2004 did the
"maximum daily flow" exceed the Permit to Take Water or exceed the maximum flow
rate of treated water to the distribution system.
.. ./2
\
Page Two
Letter to M.O.E.
Re: Robincrest - Annual Compliance Report for 2004
March 24. 2005
The highest "daily flow" for the year from Well #2 occurred on June 13th at 479 m3; and
to the distribution system, it was 402 m3 on June 13th. Well #1 was not used in 2004.
Magnetic flow meters have been installed to record the flow from Well #'s 1 and 2 and
through the distribution system.
To ensure accuracy to within + or - 5% of flow within the range of 10% to 100% of the
full scale reading of the rnagnetic flow meters, Summa Engineering Limited calibrated
them on September 21,2004.
WATER QUALITY
Bacteriological samples were taken weekly fram the wells, pumphouse and distribution
system, by certified Operators employed by the Township and submitted to Central
Ontario Analytical Laboratory in Orillia. Two hundred and sixty-three (263) samples
were tested for "total coliforms" and "fecal coliforms" in 2004. One (1) test result during
the year had a reportable count of "total coliforrns". M.O.E.E. Spills Action Centre and
the Simcoe County District Health Unit were notified, resamples were taken and
returned negative. No further actions were required.
To ensure that the chlorine residual was maintained above 0.2 mglL in the distribution
system, and a free chlorine residual was available in the distribution system, 12%
Sodium Hypochlorite was pumped into the system. A total of 380 litres of 12% Sodium
Hypochlorite, or an average of 0.98 L/day, was used in the Robincrest system in 2004.
Four hundred and twenty (420) daily tests for free chlorine in the distribution system
were performed by certified Township Operators using a "Hack Pocket Colorimeter"
during 2004. These tests were performed to ensure chlorine residual was above 0.2
mglL in the distribution system.
A Prominent Dulcometer analyses the chlorine residual continuously after the 15 minute
contact time and is recorded by a data logger.
An On-Line ABB 4670 Series Turbidity Meter measures turbidity continuously after the
15 minute contact time and is recorded by a data logger.
Raw water turbidity tests are performed monthly by Township staff using a "Hack
Pocket Turbidity Meter" and recorded in the daily log book.
Quarterly water quality analyses sampling was performed by Geospec Engineering Ltd.
in order to satisfy testing parameters for treated water, as per Ontario Regulation
#170103 dated June, 2003. Samples were taken by Geospec Engineering Ltd. and
forwarded to Lakefield Research Limited for chemical testing.
.. ./3
Page Three
Letter to M.O.E.
Re: Robincrest - Annual Compliance Report for 2004
March 24. 2005
The chemical analysis results did not reveal any health related reportable exceedences
during 2004.
On July 19, 2002, the Ministry of the Environment issued Amended Certificate of
Approval #1895-5C6QT5 for the Robincrest Water Supply System.
"COMPLIANCE WITH TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE CERTIFICATE OF
APPROVAL"
Under Section 5.1, Upqradinq Requirements, the Certificate of Approval required the
Township to have physical improvements, which were completed at the end of 2002.
"NON-COMPLIANCE WITH TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE CERTIFICATE OF
APPROVAL"
On November 30, 2004, the Ministry of the Environrnent inspected the Robincrest Water
System to confirm compliance with current Regulations and to review the Permit to
Take Water and Certificate of Approval.
There were no Provincial Officer's Orders at this time.
Six (6) non-compliances with regulatory requirements and actions required were
identified and are attached as Schedule I.
"BEST PRACTICES RECOMMENDATIONS"
From the November 30, 2004 inspection, the Ministry, in the interest of continuous
improvement, provided the Township of Oro-Medonte with a list of thirty (30)
suggestions for the operation of the Robincrest Water System.
From this list, the Township of Oro-Medonte has presently completed six (6) of these
suggestions.
Any further information required with respect to this Compliance Report for the
Robincrest Water System should be directed to the undersigned at (705) 487-2171.
Sincerely
,..oF ORO-MEDONTE
/
Keith M 's., C.R.S.I.
Director of Engineering and Environmental Services
KMlps
Attachments
..\~
Township of Oro.Medonte
MAXIMUM CAlLY FLOWS. 2004
Robincrest Pumphouse
Well #2
Date Flow Reading Daily Flow Distribution Flow Daily Distribution
(cu.m) (cu.m) Reading (cu.m) Flow (cu.m) Comments
31.Dec-03 49303 202 49607 18.
January t- -- t-
c_
1 49382 79 49707 100
2 49587 205 49891 184 Maximum Daily Flow
f-- 3 49670 - 83 49983 92
4 49789 119 50104 121 --- ~- -
5 49952 163 50273 169 - --
-~._._- "~'" -
_!L......-_ +------_ 50071 __ -- 11. 50397 124 --
7 50198 - 127 50546 149 -
-- -
8 _50322 ~_ 124 50671 ~~-,-" -"~.,. - --.---
---
t----. 9 50480 158 50810 -- t---,._~- .--',-- --
~~-,_.
I---'-~'"'- _5060~"m_" r-'''~''--- __",_,_,?094~",_ ,.. 135 ------~_.
--,-,~,-_.__.,' --- --"~"-~",,,,
f--- 11 59733 t-..........1.eL...-- ~_",,__?1048,~.~ I---- 103 --", -"-,-",,,~-,,-,,--""._--'-'-"'-~'--
1-_---'1___ 50896 163 51199 ".~~- "-,, --.------.-
,.... 13 t--.21!J.~.- +-----,~."..- ___ 5134...i.-,,,,,,,,_ .._-~--- ----- -".,-,.,-,--. '~"'-"-""-"'''-'--'~
14 .-----2~ 133 ~"'_ t--- 120 51459 -- 115 ..-
- --""-
- 15 51294 -- t- 16L_ "'~'" 5160~ ,,~""'-,- -- --
.--.
16 51414 120 51735 t-------"~~,- --.----------
- ~-,,~".,,--
17 51538 124 j..- 51863 - 1---. 128 .-
~,~_.,-
.- 18 51674 136 52000 137 -,~- ---
--
19 518:;>L...",,_ t-- 147__ ~--".~~ 145 -
1------.20 51946 -- 125 j- 52279 -~'"" --"'" ---.-
~' 52106 -- 1----......1'!9~ +-~~~~,- f--,....-...C6.L......_
-~,---"',._"._.
22 52223 __ +--""~-~ ,!---------------.??548 _." ~--~_._" ---.----.-. -",--,.",-",,_.,-
1--.~1......_._ +------,,~2341_,_ ~,--------.1.!L,__ 1-- 52674 I--'-"-'~~"'- --.-.- ._'''",,,-'
"-~."'-- t--. 52428 87 52771 .-- t-.--...E---- -~---_._---------_.__.__._--
25 52581 153 _22920",._ ~.~.:!.~,,-~ -~-,-'",._- -~-,,--
26 +__. 52748_~ t-----" 167 ~_ _,~ 53017 ~._." 157 '. --.----------.-.------
1---- 27 52870 12~_ _~ 532,17 __ .-- 140 .-- --
28 53026 .~156 ~_ +------~,,533~~_ ._~-- --~ ~,,---- --
29 53145 11. 53468 123 - _. --
30 53264 "+---------__119 ~,,_ j-- 53597 129 .--- -~--
31 53386 122 53734 137
--
Average Daily
Flow 131.7
GRAND TOTAL
(Distribution)
4127
Page 1
Township of Ora-Madonta
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS. 2004
Robincrest Pumphouse
Well #2
Date Flow Reading Daily Flow Distribution Flow Daily Distribution
(cu.m) (cu.m) Reading (cu.m) Flow (cu.m) Comments
31...Jan..04 53386 122 53734 137
February .-. -
1 53525 ~, 139__~ 53867 +----- 133 -----~"'~-"--""~,----,~--
2 53875 150 54016 +------~---- 1------.---- ._,-,",_..-
--_.,,-
_.2......._ 53807 132 -' .~...~~~~"'- 138 I---
4 53955 148 54295 - - 141 .- -~---
5 54075 120 54427 -~~",.~ .
-,,-
6 54193 118 54547 ---'- 120 ._.."'-~
-~--
7 54314 121 54661 114 --. --
8 54432 118 54769 108
.-- ~"--- ..
9 54591 _'59~ 54943 174 ---~._-
-- . --'-""-
10 - 54707 116 -- - 55045 -- 102 .- .-- "-'--
-. 11 54825 118 55168 +----~- 1---.-.---
I---~- __ 54945 __ 120 55301 - 133 -~---~"----" --
1--~_13_._ _.25064.",._. 119 55404 _.~~,~- 1------,_.,._--,,- --~
."~_.,- -
14 .. -- 55183 119 -. 5_5525 121 -- 1---_. --~-
15 55;i05 ".._ ~~ 122_. __5J!664 '^"~'" +--- 139 '-' -~,--"'-~"~~~-"''''-,~,,. -.-
"~~- 55430 125_.~ 55794 130 ---
.. ....-..-..--
17 55589 159,,__ ,,_ 55930 ~~ .~_~6~_,_~ ""-~-,,-- ',,~._--- .-
-- 18 55706 117 56057 127 --~----------
19 55822 116 56178 121 --
20 55941 119 56282 . 104 .- ,--' ----,,-- .~-
21 56061 120 56412 13D
22 56182 121 56536 124 -- f------ -----,--
23 56305 123 56672 136 .
24 56462 157 56811 139 -~". ---
25 56581 119 56937 -- j-- 126 - .-
26 56654 73 57025 88 ---
.
27 56815 161 57155 130 --- --..,.--.------.-.--------.-
26 56934 119 57281 126 ',,-" --
29 57057 123 57421 14D
Average Daify
Flow 126.6
GRAND TOTAL
(Distribution)
3687
Page 2
Township of Oro-Medonte
MAXIMUM DAilY FLOWS - 2004
Robincrest Pumphouse
Well #2
Date Flow Reading Daily Flow Distribution Flow Daily Distribution
(cu.m) (<u.m) Reading (cu.m) Flow (cu.m) Comments
29-Feb-04 57057 123 57421 140
March
-- ~""-- -
1 57177 -~-,- r__~527 "'~~ -"'~,-- --
~-~ _ 57311_,_ ~~L-..", _, 5767~~. 14B -'~"-'~---'-''''
3 57420 109 57785 110
4 . 57539,,~_ ~_19 __ '-- 57903 -~~.,~- ----_.~.~ "'-". --
,. 5 57657 11B "----..2.~016 .~--- -.----.- .
6 57734 77 58107 91
7 57935 201 58281 174 Maximum Daily Flow
B 58023 BB -- c-' 58387 106 .- f---
...__L-._ c-------- 58148,_ 125 58521 -- --,,-~"'._. -",~-",,-~.,-,~~--,--"---,,-'--
10 58268 120 ",,,_,, 586,34 __ -",--" 113 - - .~--'"
~,......1L_ 58409 141 58765 .- - 131 f--------.-- .- ..-
~,,_-1g____ _"" 58505~~ 96 58867 - 102 ._,~,- .
--~~,- _.,,~?B4 __ --~- --,,~,~..,,- _.~_..- \------..-.- .- -"',-,-,.
14 58748 164 59107 ~,,------.J~ .~-"-
---
15 58874 .-. _ 126 __ ~_..59238 ._ _"'------....l?~,,_ ~-"'"-~-~"'-~. ._"'~,~,--"'-
16 59031 __",...'.57.,. 59370 132 .-.. f--.-, _.~ - -
_......1l...._ - 59149 11B -- _,"._~9492 ~ ------'-------~_. -'--"-"'--'-'~'--"'-"--'- '---
1B 59227 7B 59595 -- ""'-,-~-'" 1--"- ~._-
'.. 19 5~3B7._ ".------L6~,_,,'" -. 59740 145 -- ._~''''-~_.,,'~''''-''''''~
20 59463 _""l'3......,,_ -- 59820 BO -- r--"'- ..- "-,,,,-,,,--,,-,_._,,,,-,--,,,_.._--""""-""-
21 59582 -- -. 119 59940 120 -- ._...~._-,-----"-'_.-
22 59747 165 6009~,_._ --~._'" . --
.
23 59893 146 .- - 60239 141 - 1------_.
24 59997 104 60367 -- -,,_......J..g? ~''''---_. ~""----~---"
25 60128 131 60471 .- - 104 . -
-
26 60244 __116__ -- 60598 127 .
27 60319 75 60676 "'..------.ZQ-..- -- ,,~-~'''' -~
28 -- 60496 'F 60848 ___172 "._ I-----_._-~ '-'-
29 60606 110 . ""950 _._ --..!QL-- c-_.____.
30 60730 ~- _"..~1082 '" 132 ..- c--.----.. -.._- --
31 60898 168 61218 136
Average Daily
Flow 123.9
GRAND TOTAL
(Distribution)
3797
Page 3
Township of Oro-Medonte
MAXIMUM DAll V FLOWS ~ 2004
Robinerest Pumphouse
Well #2
Date Flow Reading Daily Flow Distribution Flow Daily Distribution
(cu.m) (cu.m) Reading (cu.m) Flow {cu.m} Comments
31-Mar-D4 60898 168 6121b 136
April
---"-~"'-"-'-~-
1 60975 77 61323 105
2 ~. 6 t095 120_,_ ,~"~~~-,, 112
--- -.
3 61221 126 -- -- 61573 138 ~
4 61336 ~. -. 115 61687 114 -,,~,._~~
,-,~.~~,---~-""--"-
5 61460 124 61796 109 -- ---- . -~
6 -,,~~-._-,~ 123 61&34 -- c....- 138__ -~ ~.
7 61743 180 62065 131 --
\-----. 8 61826 -~- 83 ~~ _.~~,,~ 106 "~.- --~~~--"--'
r-~ 9 6~,938 ~_ -~- ~,~2257,,~_ c--- 86 _.~",-,-"'-'- -,,~._,~",
f--J..O... 62094 156 62,,416 ",-". I---._~--- -,-,._.,-,,----_._------~--
1--',,----.1..~~ 62227 - --~"" __ 625""--.",,__. l---~~.,,-- -~- ~~._----
12 62350 - ._-~" -"'.~-- ~- 127 .- -~",-~,---_..-~_.__._._~---------
13 62473 ~- -- 123 , 62792 ,,_""~ f..-......1E~ -,-"-,-""-,,,,,,---",-"'-~-"-"'"---'''-''''~'''''
1--------_14" 62611 138 62933 ~- 141 -~~'-'''-'-'--'---'''--'-~
15 62767 156 ~,~~-,,_.- 188 ~-~
16 62892 125 .- _............E'~__ f---~-" _.,,- ~-
-- 17 62969 77 63302 . 103 ~~..- --~""--'-"-----"
18 63115 146 ..~ 63424 122 ~ --
19 63258 143 63575.._ ._,~-
20 63382 -- ~'"- _,,_6368~,,_ j.......",,_...lli'..__ -.-'" --
21 ~_,,6354~_ _'QQ.._ _~384~_,,_ 1---. 156 --_._"._""-,,.~----,,~"-'---"
22 63665 123 ..._ 63952 "" 111 -",_.,-"'-"- -'-"-~--"~~"'-"
23 63798 133 - ._,.........64057_._ +---.,_.."..JQ?,_.",,-, f--. -""-"""~" --,-""'-""----,~_.-
24 63877 79 64166 109
25 64100 223 64402 236 Maximum Daily Flow
26 64207 - "~!QZ...-,, 64483 -- 81 ~- -",._',--- ~..,'-''''-,-"-_.,--''~,,.
27 64331 1~4 64624 -/---.----..-1..41-,,,,_ I----~,,~.,_._---_."--"--'--~.,-
28 64453 122 ..- __"" 64746_,_ .~"~-,-,, c--'-----,--,.~-~-"-'-'--~-~--~-
29 64616 163 __ 64870 --c--.~ 124 "~"-'-"'----'-" ".---
30 64736 120 64997 127
Average Daily
Flow
127.9
-
'/-)
9
GRAND TOTAL
(Distribution)
3779
Page 4
Township of Oro-Medonte
MAXIMUM CAlLY FLOWS. 2004
Robincrest Pumphouse
Well #2
Date Flow Reading Daily Flow Distribution Flow Daily Distribution
(cu.m) (cu.m) Reading (cu.m) Flow (cu,m) Comments
3o-Apr..04 64736 120 64997 127
_~ay '.--- ~_. - I----~ -~,-~--". ..-
-"'''~_!_- r-------_~860 __ f---~4......- _,,~09 ~_ ~_..!E...__ !-----.---. . -",--
~_........?- -~ 64978 "'.~-- 65246 137 - I------.~ "'",--
-
3 65143 -"~-- _.,_. 65386,,,,_ +---''''---.!~~''''- ~"'~'''''-_.,'''_.,'''._.,'''- ,,-,,-~.,,-"',---"-'" .-~-",,,,-"-,,--
4 65267 -~~- -- 65514 ~._.,,- f--------~----_.-.----------
_....L__ 65479 ~?12 "''''_ _~_~5697 __ f-.- 183 .
6 65608 129 65842 145 .--
"'--~-,~_.
7 65726 118 65939 97 .-----.
8 65845.,,_ __",,119,~_ __, 6604~,,, +-----,-~"'-_. "'--'"'~_.
- 9 66005 160 ~-~ 66186 . 142 ~"""-_._"'" -,"'--
10 ~ _",~",131 ~_ -~- ~~318 _~ +---""'-----.!~,~ f-----,,-------.,---'~.-.-'--
_....J.1.._ -. 66254 123 66430 +-- 112 . .-
-- 12 663?~,,_ ~ 123 . 66550 120 .-.-- f- .~'" . .-
,,-,~""- - 66493 .. _",116 "'~~""- t-----J!Yl....- >--" -",,---""~-- ~
14 66677 1~~", 66758 ~-"'" +---""'-"'-~""-"'- f---~-----.~-~---- -"",-"",-"
~""~- _,6668?'_.",_ __,..J.O..~,__ --,,~~,~,_. ._--~,?_"'- ,,--'" --,-
_...'.6... 66884 --""~-- 67014 I--~ 189 ~- ."-"---,.",,,-..-,,-.,,-.,.,,.-..--.-.-.---------
-~
~- 17 66965 81 _, 6709~,,_ -,-,~-"-",,. f------ -,-,--,._-,--"'--
18 -- -- 67089 124 --- -- 67216 __",......l!?..._,... >---._-"------,,,,--,--,,-
_'9 67206 117 _,__ 67338 __ .._,~,,~.- f--.-",---",,-------
20 67334 128 "...?745~",__ +--...1.22.-- f----~--.---. ~---
21 67458 124 ~_~563 _ j--- 105 .._-~ --
22 67578 120 - 67683 120 f----.
23 67698 120 6778~ J--..!QL. - .-
24 ,,67773 75 67859 +----"~,,- ~.~
25 67939 166 68017 158 ~-~~- ~--_.__. ~_.-
26 68057 118 68131 114 ,. --
27 68179 _,~2 ~_ -. 68247 ~~- j--"~,,..~~,,- '--_..,---,.",-,,--_. .---
28 68298 119 68353 106 ~'--'--~.,--'-'~._"-""-'-"'--',.,-
29 68374 76 68425 72
30 68641 267 68689 264 Maximum Daily Flow
31 68737 96 68779 90
Average Daily
Flow 129,1
GRANO TOTAL
(Distribution)
3782
Page 5
Township of Oro.Medonte
MAXIMUM DAlL V FLOWS - 2004
Robincrest Pumphouse
Well #2
Date Flow Reading Daily Flow Distribution Flow Daily Distribution
(cu.m) (cu.m) Reading (cu.m) Flow (cu.m) Comments
31-May..(l4 68737 96 68779 90
June -- f-- .- -- .- --
1 68889 152 1-------~895 _,_ - 116 ._.~~~" -
2 69010 . 121 6903? -,~~ --
3 69190 180 69181 .- ~- 144 . - --
_.....!....- r" 69289 _ ,7, ~::: - _.~~--- ---- ._,-
5_ l--_.?9436 _ ~ 100,,_ ~--~ -~"--,, -- .--.------
6 69776 r---------.?40 _ __69730__ _ 317 ___ -----""".,.--"".-.. --
....._........J___ 1---....J'~863 __ ~~- ~~- ~ __ 89 ""~ -
__8__ 70099 236 70018w_ ~~~~-~-- ~- -- ----- --- - ,,-"-~
9 70341 f---_242 __70211__ --~- ----,._.~"" .--.------
10 70507. 166 .__-L__...70322 "" 111 _~ - -,~.,"'-""'~,-"'-"'---~
-'-- 11 70747 240 .__,.70526_,,~ --,~,,~ "'",-~-
12 70894 147 70658 '32
13 71373 479 71060 402 Maximum Daily Flow
-- 14 71456 - 83 71129 --. 60 ",.~ ~------ . --~ .--
~~"'_. 71647 -- 1-------""J.Ql.~- 71287 .- -,.,'-~"'-"''''- --- ..--". ------.--
16 71843 196 71416 12. -.---
--"'~-"'-~"-~--
17 720.?L,.,_ 180.,,,_ "-"'~~~"..,,- _.",......1.~.,.,_ .,--_.,."._,,~_.,._-,------------
18 72251 228 ?1756 ~,,~,-,- ~--_._------_. --
19 " 72425 _.,_ f------....--!l1.._. ._~-----Zl~...".._. _-..-:!~~.,. _."""-,, .- ._-
20 72770 3~5 ~" 72173 - ~_,,~, 290",___,_ --...-.----.--.
21 72890 120 + 722715:,,__ ___ 102__ -~------ ._"'m
22 73120 -- f-~ 23<2--",,_ 72456 - -"..._,~,,-_.. -
23 7330D - [----.--_ 189_. __----.Z?590 ..__ _",_l~~",,_ - ._-""'-~--"',.,-'"
!---~~.- 1--- 7~516 216 'f-- 72755 165 .~"~",'-,~~-" "-'~
25 73877 ~L- 1---- 72863 ..-. - 108 .-... - --
!-~- 73817 140 72978 -- --,,~.._- "-~".. -.-
-- 27 74156 33. 73220 _" 242 ...~ _."._-~"_.
28 . 74256 100 73295 . 75 ---
29 74471 - 215 . 73459 '--' 164 -- --,,,
30 74742 271 73663 204
-
Average Daily
Flow
200.2
~",,,,,~ft
GRAND TOTAL
(Distribution>
..-'
4884
Page 6
Township of Oro-Medonte
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS ~ 2004
Robincrest Pumphouse
WeJJ#2
Date Flow Reading Daily Flow Distribution Flow Daily Distribution
(cu.m) (cu.m) Reading (cu,m) Flow (cu.m) Comments
30-Jun-04 74742 271 73663 204
July --
. -
1 74933 191 -- 73815 152 ,J..-..---.--.
2 75110 - _ f77~_ 73949 --. ".....,_ 134__ ---..- --
3 75408 298 74186 -- ".~_.~_..~ ~_..__._~..- .-
-- 4 75602 -- __194 _._ f--~~" 159 -~.~~~---^.
5 75773 171 74479 134 .--.-.-"-,,,,-.-----'----
6 75939 166 74592 113 -,,-~.-
'-...-.1....-__ 76104 - - 165 74719 -- 127 '-' --
8 76285 181 74840 121 - '--'---
--~.- 76410 125 74931 -- ._~~.- --- ._-,,~"
,.......1.Q..... 76580 170 75078 __ -~-..-!.~_.~._~ -. --,,~-" .-.-.---
11 -- ~7683!...~ ~" 251~w 1----..._J5273_.._ ~._.---1.~_"", -----------------.---
___-"_..:!_2 ~'_ 76961 .- f.- 130 75380 107 -- .-----.---------'----
13 77151 , '---.~-" f..------_75546_._ 166 - ~"""
14 77328 171 75686 140
IS ,--Y~ 202 758~9 -~-~.,,-"-
-.-- 16 77650 120 _~942 .__ -_....-.-:!Q~~ -- -~._-_..._~--~.~- --
-- 17 77856 - f--.~206 __ 76082 - 140 -- --
18 77981 125 76176' - 94 --~---_.
19 78136 155 76308 - 132 -- ----.'"
20 78261 125 76423 J----------.~~""- --.-' --
I-. 21 78468 207 76563 .-- .. 140 - .-------
22 78628 160 -- +-..._,,~~- t----- 138 -,~--~,~"-'~-'~~~-""
1--. 23 78793 165 j.............. 768?40...,_.._ L-_..__",~9_",._ --- ..-..-.-...--..-- ._-~~....~.
24 78963 -- 170 76957 133 -~~~._-_....~.~
25 79146 183 77104 147
26 79458 312 77385 281 Maximum Daily Flow
27 79642 184 77535 ISO -- -""
28 79810 j..-..... 168 77677 l---~- ~",-,._-,,--------'---
1----
29 80095 285 77908 231 ---- -
30 80368 273 ___ 781~,,_ f..-~--
31 80546 178 78313 162
,-
Average Daily
Flow 187.2
GRAND TOTAL
(Distribution)
4650
Page 7
Township of Oro-Medonte
MAXIMUM DAilY FLOWS ~ 2004
Robincresl Pumphouse
Well #2
Date Flow Reading Daily Flow Distribution Flow Daily Distribution
(cu.m) (cu.m) Reading (cu.m) Flow (cu.m) Comments
31..JuJ.04 80548 178 78313 182
August
-.- t-----
1 80720 174 78448 135
2 80894 174 78581 133
3 81141___f----.-?47 -~t-----......l~'-"--~-f---.- 229._.
4 81294 153 78919 109
--~~...
J--"~-t-' 81507 21~~ 79080 161 _"~__,____.~
6 81720 213 79246 ---f--- 188 _..._.
7...,_---'- 81646 126 ,....._+---__}9351 __I-----',,---.l~_ ___________......_.~___
_-"--_1--.~79 __I-- 233 ..1'!5iQ........_. 195_.____~
f----- 9 82340 ,...,~,~?61 _..._-J-----...,~79795 .....~...I------'~~,~.._ __,..._~_~,~_~__ __
__,_~_ 82556 216 __~~~~._ 170 _~_"" "'~'~""___"_"~"'~~""_"_""_"___"_
I--'--'--'~ t----- 82725 189 _8009L.....__1--~_'28 .___.____.___________._
12 _82888 ""'_ ~L.... +-----.",..----.!!0217 "'..._I-----"'_.~~"...._ _,__,_....~,_"'_~~.._..,,_.__...,,~~,__
13 83048 -....-r... 16q,..._ _~~~_._...__."'~_..._ ,,_...~...... _.__..._,,__,~,~,__...
14 83173 __1~__-!--------_80439__f_______.....-,~_ ......
15 83342 169 _".__,!0550. 111 _...~ ...__,___"'"
16 83539 t------,,197 ... 80733 .___ 183 _ _,__~,_"_,__..._____...,,
_,_,,, 17 ~_ 83800 _" 261 ....~~._." 221 __"
18 83927 ......---:!.?~... -!---_8105~__ 97
19 84144 217 81240 189
20 1------_ 84386 242 1-----~g~-~. 189
21 84583 -.-f-------.... 177 __?1581". ... 152 __ ..._.._
f--. 22 84788_+__ 22"--(........_~1752. 171
23 85075 1------" 287 82009 257 ..._"'_..._""'"
I-------- 24 85302 227 _ 82202 193 """_,_-!--------~__...
f----,25 85593 291 82457 _.._255 ~_'''' -f--------'-,-...---.-,-..-'-~-'~-'~~-"-..-'----"
L..._,26 ~_ 85853 260 82693 236 +-------._'_m~"~'___~~_,__~,__m~~~"
27 m 86001 148 1-----,_"'82807...~ ~.._~..~"..." -/---_"..~.._~_,,_..."'_...__._
L......._ 28 86100 "... 99 __ . 82886 79 't-------..~-~....~-
29 86296 196 83019 _,_ ~_ 133 ^,""_ ...._. ._"..__" -'_"'_"'___
30 86457 161 83130 111
31 86581 124 83247 117
--.
.~-~.-
.._---~.._-
--
--
.
.--
--
...,---
..
f-.
--,~-"~
-,~..._,-'"~
."-~,~-'
-,
..._"m
-.
.,,~-,~.~""'.
-
--
-
-"~~""'-~-"
-
--
--
--'--
-
-
..-
Average Daily
Flow 194.7
GRANO TOTAL
(Distribution)
4934
Page 8
Township of QrQ.Medonte
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS. 2004
Robincrest Pumphouse
Well #2
Date Flow Reading Daily Flow Distribution Flow Daily Distribution
(cu.m) (cu.m) Reading (cu.m) Flow (cu.m) Comments
31-Aug-04 86581 124 83247 117
September -- f---.---- I----~--
'. .
f--l.........- t---. 867"-L...,_ t--- 153 +-- 83349 102 ~-_.,~~~~. --,--~-"~,
!---_......L.__ - 86941 t--- 207 -_.~~~. 151 -- -~._-"~~-"_.__.
f-_3 87114 t-------" 173~~ t-- 83639 --- --'" 139 --"-"'"-"~"---'-' --
4 87231 117 83732 93
5 87551 320 84003 271 Maximum Daily Flow
6 87682 131 84097 94
f-- 7 87865 183 - 84259 162 --.. -,-,,---,----_.. ---
8 88022 157 84365 '.- t--'''---.1Q~- -- '-~"-"'~
9 88185 163~_ _'" 844~"",,_ -. 114
10 _ 8830-'----_ 1----- 11~ ~4570 ,-~ - -
11 88414 113 m 84639 _~ 69 --
--,~"
12 88&~,,,_ -.......?~.- -t---,- 8485",,8_. 219 .-.------.
I- 13 88753 - t----...1'L- 84918 60 .,"... ---. . .
I-----~-_.- +----""~,~~""'- "._'''~-'''- -- , 850~_,,____ 111 - ___."_,,__,,,._m
1-- 15 89072 .-. _""'-"'--,,,__ _._ 8515-'---...._ ,,,~.~L-,,,_ -,---."",-.-.------.-.---.-
16 89196 124___ 85254 103 -.~--,--,-~,---,--~"._"'-"'"-''-'''
-
I- 17 -- -1------,~9354 .._ _._'58._ 85369 115 --- ~-' ,_..'"
-~._- t--. 89516 162 8548,1_.__ 1-- 112 --"'~'''' --
19 896Bo 164 85617 '- - 136 ,.-
20 89873 -- 193 85767 .- 1----......1.1;.0 "'--~-""
21 89975 102 85851 84
22 90170 '''~. 85989 ""'~,,-""-
23 90298 128 86094 105 -- - ------~,--~""
-~- -. 90473 175 86231 -- .. 137 --..-..--,---'----'...
25 90636 163 86342 ,-~" f-.. 111 ..... ---..-.
26 90842 206 86511 169 -----"---'-'
27 _2q967 ,12~",_ _,,_8660~_. I----'!L...- - "-"-"-'-"-""'-"'-"'-~'"--"---'-""-""
28 91169 202 86752 - 1------" 149_,_ --,,,-,._,,,,,_.,,,,-"--
29 91303 - 134 86859 -- _._"'L.__ -.-..,,--,,-,---.
30 91461 158 86968 109
Average Daily
Flow 162.7
GRAND TOTAL
(Distribution)
3721
Page 9
Township of Oro-Medonte
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2004
Robincrest Pump house
Well #2
Date Flow Reading Daily Flow Distribution Flow Daily Distribution .
(cu.m) (cu.rn) Reading (cu.m) Flow (cu.m) Comments
30-Sep-04 91461 158 86968 109
October ._"~-
--~~,-" . -_.~-
1 9!622 16"L_ ~~1i!-_~ ~.. 145_~_..~ f----
2 91780 15B__~ 87223 ~ 110 ..- . -
-' 3 91896 -~~. ~............"!309~_ ._......IJ!!...~_.._ f----..-
-~ 4 92071 175 87452 143 " _._-~--"'_.__._." -_._--_.._-"~-
5 92221 150 ~- -~ 87560 108
6 92376 155 87672 112 "--"._~--",.- .~",~-"-_. .~
. 7 92497 121 87773 -"-"'....!Q.L-"~- 1-------.
~_i'........._ ~~ 9269-"--.c,_ __199 ~790~_ _-...1~__ -.--..-- ~- ~-
9 92817 ~ 121 ~- __ 88004 ~_ --~"'~ f-- _.,-~""'-
10 92976 159_~ ~~8120 "..~ --,~~,,~ .._,_. --~-
-- 11 930~3 ~- _...J.:12...._ 88205 -. 85 - ~_..~._,-_...,'-----~,~--"'-""~.. -~--
__'2 93264 - 171 88354 ..- 149 -"-~-~~-'--~~~"--~-'-
~-"~ 93~27 163 88477 -- 123 ~- _..,"~ ~~
---1~._ 93584 -"- _~ 157~_ __ 8860~__ --~~- "'~"~,- ..---
15 9.~743 ""_ ..~~ ~.._~Z..~"'~ ---~.._. ._~"-"-_. --,"-- ~----
-~- _",~904 161 .-""":J.2......_ 114 .----
. ~. .
-~ 17 94065 "~"...161__ -~ 88961 129 .~'" -~-
~"~~ _~27 __ _~ 162_ __ 89088 127 '-~- f--- ..---.--
'9 94388 161 89219 -- -~"'~,-- 1--.- ._"--
. 20 94548 160 89336 117 ~ --
~~- - 94705 ~ 1?2-_ -~ 89451 115 .---
22 94813 108 89535 84 -~"~"'~--_.. -
23 94987 174 ~89666,_ -- 13' ~ .
24 95191 204 _~9835 __... ~,-,------_169_. I-----~ .
25 95317 126 89939 -- -~ 104 ."--
26 95493 176 90078 139 -~
27 9568l 189 90217 139 - ~
28 95853 171 903~6 149 ~
29 96011 158 90495 129 --
30 96128 117 90591 96
31 96384 256 90779 188 Maximum Daily Flow
Average Daily
Flow
158.8
-
GRANO TOTAL
(Distribution)
3811
Page 10
"
Township of Oro.Medonte
MAXIMUM DAILY flOWS * 2004
Roblncrest Pumphouse
WelJ#2
Date Flow Reading Daily Flow Distribution Flow Daily Distribution
(eu.m) (eu.m) Reading (cu.m) Flow (cu.m) Comments
31-0ct..o4 96384 256 90779 188
November
.-. '-"-- ~-"_.,-
1 96556 -- .. 172 90918 .~... .----
2 96719 163 -~ f--- 91061 __~133 ._,,_ 1--------.-.--. ..
3 96883 164 . 91187 136
- -
4 97039 156 91304 117 ..- f------
5 97198 1___...)59 __ !----__91441,.___ ~- 137 -,---'" .----
6 97323 125 91542 101
. .. - .-
7 97563 240 91723 '- 181
. .~._""~~"
8 97740 177 91~62 139 .-.-..-
C-..-..L..._ f---.......Q7903 __ 163 92008 - '--~-~~"" !------'~_..,---,._.,-,,-
-~ 98066 ".16~_ 92143 .- -- 135 - .,'~-_.. -' . .
11 r-------~?29 _,_ f--- 163 ~,2257 ~_... ~-~"'-- I---- -,~._- ...-----."
12 - 98432...__ f-...<Q:J-. 92417 .,.. .... 160 ..... !--.----.---. --
13 . 98604 ~.,-- 92557 ~~"'- 1------ ..._,._-',~
14 98786 -- r- 182 92719 - 162 ~-""-,.._"---,-"',. ....---
15 98985 "_ 1_.~..199 928~~_ ~. 160 --""-'~"-"~
16 _'f--_~"9184 ___ Ig9 93031 -~-,~ t--.---.----- .----
-.-.
'7 ,99321,._ \-------..137,_ "~,,.~~.~ L......,,_. 128_.,.,_ j... ._._._,~--,_.,~~--
18 995?2--_ f-- 20~ 93312 153 ~-~--"'-"'-",-~--,---~~"'-"
19 99694 -'- 167 93455 143 .-. ,--
20 99860 16-"--,_ f-. 93569 ~ 11~ --~"~'" .-
- 21 ,,- f---_,-.----!.OOO25"__,,, .65 937.28 159 ---",_"-",-,,,-~-~'~-'--"~~
-----
22 100247 ~_222 ""_ 93912 184 .~
",-'-
-----'''---- 100458 211 ~_9408~,_ ~~52 __ -'",,_.,,- --,- ~,,--
24 100621 16~__ 94194 130 .",'.. f--
-
25 100780 159 -- __"", 9431Z--..__ _.._1,~",_ f-----.-~. "._.,"'~,~.,-""~"--
26 100945 .-----165 ~- 1---___ 944~_ _...-----.-!~,-~ I-----_.._-_.__._._~-,-_.._.-
- 27 101108 ~ 163 94583 ~~- -,,,,,,, _._----_._---~-~
28 101319 211 94729 146 f-- ~---_..
29 101485 166 94884 155 -~'-~" --
3D 101654 169 95015 131
Average DaJly
Flow
~-
175.7
GRAND TOTAL
(Distribution)
4236
Page 11
Township of Oro.Medonte
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS. 2004
Robincrest Pumphouse
Well#:2
Date Flow Reading Daily Flow Distribution Flow Daily Distribution
(cu.m) (cu.rn) Reading (cu.m) Flow (cu.m) Comments
30-Nov..()4 101654 169 95015 131
December
.---- -. -. .--
1 101847 193 95162 147 "-- -",,-_._,--,,--
_...2....._ " 101984 .".- "-------1-~~ ~~~"'- I--"""-~"~,. "-
_......L_ . 102148 " ." 164 95411 -"~.,,-'''' --"._----,. "-----
4 102308 160 .- _,,_~5532._ -,,- 121 ...._~~-_..~,_....._._"-".
5 . 1 02496 " 188",,,,~ _, 95674~ f---" 142 ...,~-'~-~
6 102681 185 95826 -- 152 ."_._,,,-~,,_._" "
7 "'- _" 102846 __ _.165. 95953 I---- 127 ~-~-,-"~ ._-"~"'-'
8 103002 156 96073 - 120 -- --------. "
9 103163 -. 161 .96190 117 - --. . --
10 103317 154 96312 ,-- 1-----1.?2.....- -~"-"--- ----
--. 11 103475 158 96415 --- -~~.~,- -- --
- 12 103632 157 96532 "'~-,- -- --
-"'-"--- __~?93 "''''~ __.161"_ -~~~"- .._~-~-- ---.
14 103977 -- -- 184 " 968~_ _.,"~...~- --"-,,--.-.-----,,--"-.--
"". 15 __1041~ -.!QL- 96927 108 - ~,~~,,~""-,-~-"-- --
-,-~_.
16 1_~4290 ~_ 147 ~,,~031 _"'_ 104 ----------'
_m"" . ~"""-~-'''''''-
1--. 17 104460 170__ 97154 123 -- -""'~-~,-
18 104590 139 ~-~?~"..,,- -~~~-- -"",-,-"-,,---,,---,_.,_._--
19 104794.__ ""~~- -" 97413 164 ""~" -. "'---,-"----,-
20 104956 162 97540 127
r--' 21__ __10512'!.~ -----..J~___ -. 97655 115 " -,~._".~- .---
22 105328 204 97805 150 "--" -.
23 105447 119 97894 89
r-' 24 105648 201.__ ~~56 ~_ _........1!2_._ ------. --
25 105815 167__ ~ 981!:!~__ ~--~_.,"- --
" 26 105933 118 98291 . 105 -"-,----- .--
27 106114 181 98429 -" 138 --.... "
28 106255 141 98536 107
29 106462 207 98703 167 Maximum Daily Flow
r-- 30 1 0666~ -- I----- 202. 98854 -- -- 151 ._,-"-,,,-,"'.
"
31 106790 126 98958 104
-
..-
Average Daify
Flow 165.7
GRAND TOTAL
(Distribution)
3943
Page 12
~.Ontario
c:::;,... .uo.u&.tL t
Ministry ofthe Environment
Drinking Water System Inspection Report
...'n.............,....,.",.,...,.,..",...... ..",....,......_........._....._..-......................',.,..,...,..
~.u.W\1Ut1 ~
.. ......__,_ .........,_._,__.___'...m. mm._..",.,_,__,__.....,""""
.,.."-:....."',....".,....,,....,.._.
~, u&..A'I'DA.'4
.
","".a '-cMPLiIWCL. u.'TU
ACTIONS REQUIRED
1
The Operating Authority has failed to sample sodium in the correct location. Schedule 6-2 of O.
Reg. 170103 requires sodium to be sampled at the point of entry to the distribution system. The
sample collected on December 18, 2003 was collected in the distribution system.
\
\
Action(s} Required: The Operating Authority will resample for sodium at the point of entry to
the distribution system by May 31, 2008.
2 The Operating Authority failed to fully document any unusual events, departures from normal
operating procedures, abnormal conditions and the times these event occurred, the lengths of
the events, or the actions taken at the facility as required by Section 20(5} 3, 4, 5 of O. Reg.
435/93.
3
.
4
Action(s} Required: The Operating Authority shall record in the facility logbooks the approximate
initial time, time at completion, cause of/for, actions taken, date, staff member(s) present, results
achieved, and location of any operational checks, alarms, tests, repairs, unusual and/or
abnormal conditions and/or directions or adjustments made on or within the Robincrest system.
The Operating Authority failed to ensure that water treatment equipment is installed at the
Robincrest facilities in compliance with CofA 1895-SC6QTS. The sample location for the
continuous turbidity analyser does not correspond to the sample location prescribed in the CofA.
Action{s) Required: The Operating Authority shall comply with the prescribed sample location or
apply for an amendment to the CofA to change the sample location to the current location or the
prescribed use for this instrumentation by March 31, 2005.
The Operating Authority has failed to sample for raw water turbidity once per month before any
treatment. Schedule 7-3 of O. Reg. 170103 requires raw water turbidity to be taken from a point
before any treatment and analysed immediately once per month if the system obtains water from
a ground water source. There is no record of raw water turbidity having been analysed for the
month of November, 2004.
Action(s} Required: The Operating Authority shall collect and analyse a raw water turbidity
sample monthly from the Robincrest source.
S The Operating Authority has failed to collect samples within the time frame prescribed by
Schedule 13-6 of O. Reg. 170103. The prescribed sampling time frame for Trihalomethanes
(THM's) is at least once every three months. In 2003, samples were taken on September 9 and
December 18 which were four months apart. In 2004, samples were taken on February 26, May
31 and September 14 which were four and five months apart respectively.
6
.
Action(s) Required: The Operating Authority will ensure that sampling is conducted not more
than three calendar months apart as prescribed.
The Operating Authority has failed to collect samples within the time frame prescribed by
Schedule 13-7 of O. Reg. 170/03. The prescribed sampling time frame for nitrates and nitrites is
at least once every three months. In 2003, samples were taken on September 9 and December
18 which were four months apart. In 2004, samples were taken on February 26, May 31 and
September 14 which were four and five months apart respectively.
Action(s} Required: The Operating Authority will ensure that sampling is conducted not more
than three calendar months apart as prescribed.
....n._._._........_....,_._._..____
...-......-.,--....---
- _..._-_.__._-_.,------".,---_._~_....--_..,-,_. --...--.-.--.--..------
Report Generated for sauerph
on 3/16/2005
Page 31 of 36
\ '}c\ - \
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
REPORT
DEPT. REPORT NO.: TO: COUNCIL PREPARED BY:
EES2005-16 Keith Mathieson
SUBJECT: DEPARTMENT:
COUNCIL:
Annual Compliance Report - Engineering and
Warminster Water Supply Environmental Services
C.OFW.: and Treatment - 2004
DATE:
MOTION #: March 24, 2005
DATE: R. M. FILE NO.:
E05-14518
a
I BACKGROUND:
Section 4 of the Certificate of Approval issued to the Township of Oro-Medonte requires a written
report detailing compliance with all terms and conditions of the approval to be completed annually.
This Report is to be signed by a person designated by Council of the rnunicipality that owns the works
and a resolution is to be presented to Council that the Compliance Report has been received.
The Compliance Report was due to be completed by March 31, 2005 and available for inspection by
any member of the public without charge.
,
I ANALYSIS:
Attached is the Annual Compliance Report for 2004 for the Warminster Water Supply System, a copy
of which has been submitted to the Ministry of the Environment. This Report is being made available
to Council for information and confirmation that Ontario Regulation #170103 has been complied with
by the Township of Oro-Medonte, and identifies any non-compliance issues and actions required.
~RECOMMENDATION(S):
\ ~O\ - ~()
-
1. THAT Report #EES2005-16 be received and adopted.
2. AND THAT Council receives the Annual Compliance Report for 2004 for the Warminster Water
Supply System.
Keith ~eson
Director of Engineering and Environmental Services
1\:::
L~~
.. \ (
t
\ ~C\ - )
THE CORPORATION OF THE
148 Line 7 $q Box 100
Orc.Onta.rio LOL 2XQ
TO\vN8IiIP
rg~or~e;z;;z/e
PhonE' (705) 487-2171
fax (70S} 487-0 i 33
wwvv.oro-medonte.c<"
March 24, 2005
Ministry of the Environment
54 Cedar Pointe Drive
Unit #1201
BARRIE, Ontario
L4N 5R7
Re: Warminster Water Supply and Treatment System
Annual Compliance Report for 2004
Warminster Water System supplies 208 hornes, the Warminster Public School and the
Warminster Legion with water from one (1) ground water source well.
Permit to Take Water Renewal #92-P-3071 (Well #1), issued to the Township of Oro-
Medonte, authorizes the withdrawal of water, expiring March 15, 2012.
The Permit to Take Water for Well #1 authorizes the withdrawal of water at a rate of 600
m3 per day.
Well #2 was decommissioned and abandoned, in accordance with OReg. 903.
Certificate of Approval #2457-5U4QRN, Section 4.1, states that the drinking water
systern shall not be operated to exceed the rated capacity for maximum daily volume of
982 m3 per day.
WATER QUANTITY
Schedules have been attached showing the "average daily flow" per month and the
"maximum daily flow" per month, and the maximum flow of treated water to the
distribution system for the Warminster system. At no time during 2004 did the
"rnaxirnum daily flow" exceed the Permit to Take Water or exceed the maximum flow
rate of treated water to the distribution system.
.. ./2
\
Page Two
Letter to M.O.E.
Re: Warminster - Annual Compliance Report for 2004
March 24, 2005
The highest "daily flow" for the year from Well #1 occurred on June 13th at 535 m3. The
highest "daily flow" to the distribution system occurred on July 25th at 491 m3, caused by
a water main break on Hwy. #12.
A new meter chamber and register was installed In the flow meter for Well #1 on
December 9, 2002.
New mag meters were installed at the Booster Station and Well #1 in March, 2003.
To ensure accuracy to within + or - 5% of flow within the range of 10% to 100% of the
full scale reading of the magnetic flow meters, Surnma Engineering Limited calibrated
them on September 21, 2004.
WATER QUALITY
Bacteriological samples were taken weekly from the well, pumphouse and distribution
system, by certified Operators ernployed by the Township and submitted to Central
Ontario Analytical Laboratory in Orillia. Two hundred and eight (208) samples were
tested for "total coliforms" and "fecal coliforms" in 2004. In 2004, there was one (1)
reportable result of "total coliforms". M.O.E.E. Spills Action Centre and the Simcoe
County District Health Unit were notified, resamples were taken and returned negative.
No further actions were required.
To ensure that the chlorine residual was maintained above 0.2 mglL in the distribution
system, and a free chlorine residual was available in the distribution system, 12%
Sodium Hypochlorite was pumped into the system. A total of 400 litres of 12% Sodium
Hypochlorite, or an average of 1.09 L/day, was used in the Warminster system in 2004.
Four hundred and twenty-one (421) daily tests for free chlorine in the distribution system
were perforrned by certified Township Operators using a "Hack Pocket Colorimeter"
during 2004. These tests were performed to ensure chlorine residual was above 0.2
mglL in the distribution system.
A Prominent Dulcometer analyses the chlorine residual continuously after the 15 minute
contact time and is recorded by a data logger.
An On-Line ABB 4670 Series Turbidity Meter rneasures turbidity continuously after the
15 minute contact tirne and is recorded by a data logger.
. . ./3
\
Page Three
Letter to M.O.E.
Re: Warminster - Annual Compliance Report for 2004
March 24. 2005
Raw water turbidity tests are performed monthly by Township staff using a "Hack Pocket
Turbidity Meter" and recorded in the daily log book.
Quarterly water quality analyses sampling was performed by Geospec Engineering Ltd.
in order to satisfy testing parameters for treated water, as per Ontario Regulation
#170103 dated June, 2003. Samples were taken by Geospec Engineering Ltd. and
forwarded to Lakefield Research Limited for chemical testing.
The chernical analysis results revealed Sodium results of 42.1 mglL, which is consistent
with previous test results.
Although the aesthetic objective of Sodiurn in drinking water is 200 mg/L, the Medical
Officer of Health was notified that the concentration exceeded 20 mg/L.
On December 18, 2003, the Ministry of the Environment issued Amended Certificate of
Approval #2457 -5U4QRN for the Warminster Water Supply Systern.
This amendrnent was required for the upgrades to the Booster Station.
On August 5, 2004, the Ministry of the Environment issued Certificate of Approval
#4535-62MQFB for the installation of the standby generator set.
"COMPLIANCE WITH TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE CERTIFICATE OF
APPROVAL"
Under Part 8, Upqradinq Requirements, the Certificate of Approval required the
Township to have physical irnprovements (a list of which may be received upon request)
cornpleted by July 31, 2004. These upgrades have been cornpleted as part of the
contract to Brookside Contracting.
On December 14, 2004, the Ministry of the Environment inspected the Warrninster
Water System to confirm compliance with current Regulations and to review the Permit
to Take Water and Certificate of Approval.
From this inspection, there were no Provincial Officer's Orders issued.
.. ./4
. .
\ :lC\- "ll\
Page Four
Letter to M.O.E.
Re: Warminster - Annual Compliance Report for 2004
March 24. 2005
"NON-COMPLIANCE WITH TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE CERTIFICATE OF
APPROVAL"
Ten (10) non-compliances with regulatory requirements and actions required were
noted and are attached as Schedule I.
"BEST PRACTICES RECOMMENDATIONS"
From the December 14, 2004 inspection, the Ministry, in the interest of continuous
improvernent, provided the Township of Oro-Medonte with a list of thirty-one (31)
suggestions for the operation of the Warminster Water System.
From this list, the Township of Oro-Medonte has presently completed nine (9) of these
suggestions.
Any further information required with respect to this Compliance Report for the
Warminster Water System should be directed to the undersigned at (705) 487-2171.
Sincerel
TOW SHI~ OF ORO-MEDONTE
Keith leson, C.R.S.I.
Director of Engineering and Environmental Services
KMlps
Attachments
Township of Oro-Medcnte
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2004
Warminster Pumphouse
t
\
-~~
Wellt1
Date Flow Reading Daily Flow
(cu.m) (cu.m) Comments
31-Dec-D3 22182 289
January I
1 , 22326 144
2 22598 272
3 22747 149
4 22933 186
5 23184 251
6 191 . /
23375
7 23600 225
8 23756 156
9 24043 287 I Maximum Daily Flow
10 24246 203 ,
11 24413 167
12 24645 232
13 24868 223
14 25041 173
15 25288 247
16 25498 210
17 25696 198
18 25889 193
19 26099 , 210
20 26306 207
21 I 26581 275
22 26722 141
23 26920 198
24 27095 175
25 27329 234
26 27561 232
27 27769 208
28 27982 213
29 28178 196
30 i 28399 221
31 I 28605 206
I Average Daily Flow I
207.2
Page 1
Township of Oro-Medonte
MAXIMUM CAlLY FLOWS. 2004
Warminsler Pumphouse
'f"\
\ oLeA -
VJ
Well #1
Date Flow Reading Daily Flow
(cu.m) (cu.m) Comments
31-Jan~4 28605 206
February I
1 i 28795 190
2 29015 220
3 29252 237 i
4 29443 191
5 29642 199
6 I 29821 179
7 30017 196
8 30194 177
9 30445 251
10 30649 204
11 30866 217
12 31081 215
13 31249 168 I
14 31454 205
15 31704 250
18 31921 217
17 32134 213
18 32360 i 226
19 32550 190
20 32745 195
21 32969 224
22 33160 191
23 33381 221
24 I 33633 252 Maximum Daily Flow
25 i 33826 I 193
28 I 33992 166
27 i 34205 213
28 I 34450 245
29 i 34666 216 i
I Average Daily Flow I
209.0
Page 2
Township of Oro-Medonte
MAXIMUM CAlLY FLOWS - 2004
Warminster Pumphouse
\
\
Well #1
Date Flow Reading Daily Flow
(cu.m) (cu.m) Comments
29-Feb.Q4 34666 216
March
1 34843 177
2 35076 233
3 35295 219
4 i 35483 188 i
5 35707 224 I
6 35829 122 I
7 36148 319 , Maximum Daily Flow
8 36303 155
9 36546 243
10 36711 165
11 36954 243
12 37130 176
13 37269 I 139
14 37500 , 231
15 37723 223
16 37944 221
17 38152 208
18 38337 185
'9 38571 234
20 38712 14'
21 i 38905 193
22 39171 266
23 39425 254
24 39588 I 163
25 39771 I 183
26 40003 I 232
27 40157 i 154
28 40464 307 I
29 40595 131 i
30 40785 '90 1
31 1 41041 256
I Average Daily Flow I
205.6
Page 3
Township of Oro-Medonte
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS ~ 2004
Warminster Pumphouse
\
Well #1
Date Flow Reading Daily Flow
(cu.m) (cu.m) Comments
31~Mar.04 41041 256
April
1 41325 284
2 41439 114
3 41668 229
4 41871 203
5 42052 181
6 42296 244
7 42504 208
8 42683 179
9 42806 123
10 43068 262
11 43267 199
12 43473 206
13 43683 210
14 43871 188
15 44171 300
16 44376 205
17 44463 87
18 44653 190
19 44895 242
20 45111 216
21 4$326 215
22 45530 204
23 4$695 165
24 i 45833 138
25 I 46193 360 , Maximum Daily Flow
i
26 46306 113 I
27 46524 218
28 46743 219
29 , 46918 175
30 I 47093 175 i
I Average Daily Flow I
201.7
Page 4
Township of Oro-Medonte
MAXIMUM DAilY FLOWS ~ 2004
Warminster Pumphouse
\JC\-~~
Well #1
Date Flow Reading Daily Flow
(cu.m) (cu.m) Comments
3o-Apr~04 47093 175
May I
1 T 47229 136
2 , 47406 177
3 47599 193
4 47769 170
5 47949 180
6 48134 185
7 48281 147
8 48439 158
9 i 48673 i 2"34
10 48833 160
11 48986 153
12 49206 220
13 49378 172
14 49549 171
15 49667 118
16 i 50001 334
17 50133 132
18 50361 228
19 50500 139
20 50659 159
21 50824 165
22 50995 171
23 51178 183
24 , 51317 139
25 51572 255
26 51779 207
27 51918 139
28 52067 149
29 52187 120
3D ! 52541 354 Maximum Daily Flow
31 52650 109
I Average DajJy f:Jow I
179.3
Page 5
Township of Qro-Medonte
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2004
Warminster Pumphouse
Idc, -
Well#!
Date Flow Reading Daily Flow
(eu.m) f~u.m) Comments
31-May..04 52650 109
June
1 52820 170
2 53021 201
3 53160 139
4 53361 201
5 53533 172
6 53874 341
7 53973 99
8 54226 253
9 54429 203
10 54638 209
11 54859 221
12 55026 167
13 55561 535 Maximum Daily Flow
14 55676 115
15 55932 256
16 56116 184
17 56361 245
18 56571 210
19 56791 220
20 57067 276
21 57186 119
22 , 57392 206
23 57555 163 I
24 57773 , 218
25 57940 r 167
26 58074 I 134
27 58449 375
28 58523 74
29 58736 213
30 58849 113
I Av~rage Daily Flow I
206.6
Page 6
Township of Oro-Medonte
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2004
Warminster Pumphouse
\)
\
Well #1
Date Flow Reading Daily Flow
(cu.m) (cu.m) Comments
3o-Jun-04 58849 113
July 1
1 59035 I 186
2 59224 189
3 59545 321
4 59715 170
5 59926 211
6 60141 215
7 60285 144
8 60466 181
9 60632 166
10 60784 152
11 61143 359
12 61257 114
13 61417 160
14 61650 233
15 61839 189
16 , 61967 128
17 1 62218 251
18 , 62338 1 120
19 -1 62514 I 176
20 62731 I 217
21 62908 I 177
22 63132 ! 224
23 63308 176
24 63460 152 .
25 I 63920 460 Maximum Daily Flow - Water main break. Hwy. #12
26 i 64283 363
27 1 64466 183 I
28 64671 205 I
29 64946 I 275 !
30 65177 I 231 I
31 65349 , 172 I
I Average Daily Flow I
209.7
Page 7
Township of Oro-Medonte
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS ~ 2004
Warmins!er Pumphouse
Well #1
Date Flow Reading Daily Flow
(cu.m) (cu.m) Comments
31..Jul-04 65349 172
August
1 65511 162
2 65721 210
3 65960 239
4 66156 196
5 66400 244
6 66571 171
7 66657 86
8 66854 197
9 67088 234
10 , 67356 268
11 67527 171
12 67696 169
13 67861 165
14 68086 225
15 68218 132
16 68468 250
17 68726 258
18 68905 179
19 69068 163
20 69327 259 i
21 69449 122
22 i 69561 112 ! Wire was burnt off wen control starter
23 69613 52
24 I 69858 245
25 I 70295 437 Maximum Daily Flow
26 70517 222
27 70721 204
28 70885 164
29 71147 262
30 71363 216
31 71580 217
I Average Daily Flow I
201.0
Page 8
Township of Oro-Medonte
MAXIMUM DAilY FLOWS ~ 2004
Warminster Pump house
Well #1
Date Flow Reading Daily Flow
(cu.m) (cu.m) Comments
31-Aua-Q4 71580 217
September
1 71742 162
2 72006 264
3 72257 251
4 72357 100
5 72769 412
6 72875 106
7 73153 278
8 73336 183
9 73540 204
10 73756 216
11 73855 99
12 74268 413 I Maximum Daily Flow
13 74369 101
14 74536 167
15 74790 254
16 74961 171
17 75160 199
18 75394 234
19 75655 261
20 75841 186
21 76007 166 ,
22 76323 316
23 76545 222
24 76732 187
25 76895 163
26 , 77163 268
27 77346 183
28 77533 187
29 77708 175
30 77967 259 ,
I Average Daily Flow I
212.9
Page 9
Township of Oro-Medonte
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS ~ 2004
Warminsler Pumphouse
\
~
Well #1
Date Flow Reading Daily Flow
(cu.m) (cu.m) Comments
3Q-Sep-04 71967 259
October i
1 76147 I 180
2 78318 , 171
3 78498 i 180
4 78665 I 167
5 78899 i 234
6 79060 I 161
7 79226 I 166
8 79398 172
9 79575 177
10 79752 177
11 79925 173
12 80094 169
13 80287 193
14 80486 199
15 80653 167
16 80755 102
17 80992 237
18 81184 , 192
19 81359 175
20 81532 173
21 , 81701 169
22 81787 86
23 82000 213
24 82217 217
25 82381 164
26 82621 240
27 82787 , 166
28 82957 170
29 83129 172
30 , 83213 84
31 , 83482 269 I Maximum Daily Flow
i
I Average Daily Flow I
177.9
Page 10
Township of Oro-Medonte
MAXIMUM CAlLY FLOWS - 2004
Warminster Pumphouse
Well #1
Date Flow Reading Daily Flow
(cu.m) (cu.m) Comments
31-0ct..()4 83482 269
November
1 ! 83653 171
2 83815 162
3 84046 231
4 84210 164
5 I 84384 I 174
6 I 84508 124
7 ! 84767 259
8 I 84919 152
9 I 85139 220
10 85315 176
11 85498 183
12 85668 170
13 85853 185
14 86083 230
15 86211 128
16 86410 199
17 86569 159 ,
18 86732 163 l
19 86887 155 I
20 86971 84
21 87132 161
22 87351 219
23 I 87551 200
24 87720 169
25 87898 178
26 88076 178
27 88236 160 I
28 88502 266 Maximum Daily Flow
29 88750 248
30 88921 171
I Average Daily Flow I
181.3
Page 11
Township of Oro-Medonte
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2004
Warminster Pumphouse
Well #1
Date Flow Reading Daily Flow
(cu.m) (cu.m) Comments
3D-Nov-04 88921 171
December I
1 89085 164
2 89249 164
3 89415 166 I
4 89563 148 I
5 i 89841 278 I Maximum Daily Flow
6 90036 i 195
7 90198 I 162
8 90353 I 155
9 90427 i 74
10 90657 I 230
11 , 90730 i 73
12 , 90947 I 217
13 91136 I 189
14 91296 160
15 i 91445 149
16 91516 i 71
17 91668 152
18 91820 152
19 I 92064 244
20 92223 i 159
21 92302 79
22 92532 230 I
23 i 92611 i 79
24 92881 I 270
25 93049 168
26 I 93210 161
27 93479 269
28 93632 153 i .
29 93870 238
30 94064 194
31 94271 207
I Average Daily Flow I
172.6
Page 12
Township of Oro-Medonte
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS. 2004
Warminster Booster Station
\ dC, -
Date Distribution Flow Daily Distribution
Reading (eu.m) Flow leu.m' Comments
31~Dec--03 29655 132
January
1 29717 62
2 29847 130 ,
3 , 29910 63
4 29995 85
5 30107 112
6 30198 i 91
7 30300 , 102
8 30414 114
9 30500 86
10 30596 96 I
11 30672 76
12 I 30780 i 108
13 30882 , 102
14 30961 79
15 31010 49
16 31161 151 i Maximum Daily Flow
17 31255 94
18 31348 93
19 31436 88
20 31544 108
21 31651 107
22 31723 72
23 31816 93
24 i 31889 73
25 I 31997 108
26 , 32104 107
I
27 32197 93
28 32299 102
29 32389 90
30 32482 93
31 32576 94
GRAND TOTAL
(Distribution)
2921
Page 1
Township of Oro-Medonte
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2004
\ 'd.C\ ~
Warminster BDoster Station
Date Distribution Flow Daily Distribution
Reading (cu.m) Flow (cu.m) Comments
31.Jan..o4 32576 94
February i
1 32662 86 I
2 32766 104
3 I 32868 102
4 32956 I 88
5 33050 94
6 33129 79
7 33217 i 88 i
8 ! 33358 141 I Maximum Daily Flow
9 33412 54 I
10 33502 90 i
11 I 33600 98
12 33701 101
13 33790 I 89
14 33865 75
15 I 33979 I 114
16 34079 100
17 34176 97 I
18 34278 102
19 34366 88
20 34452 86
21 34552 100 ,
22 34641 89
23 34742 101
24 34855 , 113
25 , 34943 88 I
26 35018 75
27 35114 96
28 35222 I 108
29 35322 I 100
GRAND TOTAL
(Distribution)
2746
Page 2
~.'.,
.
TQwnship of Oro-Medonte
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2004
Warminster Booster Station
Date Distribution Flow Daily Distribution
Reading (cu.m) Flow Icu.m) Comments
29-Feb"()4 35322 100
March
1 35409 87
2 35527 118 I
3 35606 79 !
4 35691 85 I
5 35790 99
6 , 35850 60
7 I 35994 144 Maximum Daily Flow
8 36068 74
9 36174 106
10 36253 79 I
11 36360 107 i
12 36502 142
13 36610 108
14 36711 101
15 36811 100
16 I
, 36878 67
17 ! 36896 18
18 I 36988 92 I
19 i 37093 105 !
20 , 37156 63 I
21 37244 88 !
22 37370 126 ,
23 37479 109
24 37560 81
25 37644 84
26 37746 102
27 37811 65
28 37955 144
29 38077 122
30 38124 i 47
31 38220 I 96 I
GRAND TOTAL
(Distribution)
2898
Page 3
Township of Oro-Medonte
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS. 2004
\ '}G~ - l{b
Warminster Booster Station
Date Distribution Flow Daily Distribution
Reading (cu.m) Flow (cu.m) Comments
31-Mar..04 38220 96
April I I
1 38308 I 88
2 38401 93
3 38506 105
4 38601 95
5 I 38704 103
6 38793 89
7 .38898 105
8 38970 72
9 39025 55
10 39147 122
11 39237 , 90
12 I 39332 95
13 39424 92
14 39522 98
15 39649 127
16 39777 128
17 39783 6
18 39870 87
19 39984 114
20 40088 104
21 40167 79
22 40273 106
23 40348 75
24 40409 I 61
25 , 40575 I 166 Maximum Daily Flow
26 I 40631 I 56
27 I 40730 I 99
28 I 40825 95 I
29 40910 85 I
30 I 40986 76 I
GRAND TOTAL
(Distribution)
2766
Page 4
Township of Oro-Medonte
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2004
\
\
j
Warminster Booster Station
Date Distribution Flow Daily Distribution
Reading (eu.m) Flow (eu.m) Comments
3Q-Apr-04 40986 76
May I
1 41045 59
2 41125 I 80
3 41213 88
4 41288 75
5 41371 83
6 41450 79
7 I 41517 67
8 41587 I 70
9 41692 105
10 41765 73
11 41833 68
12 41933 I 100
13 42013 80
14 42088 75
15 42139 51
16 42290 151
17 , 42350 60
18 42426 76
19 42514 I 88
20 42583 69
21 42669 86
22 42748 79 I
23 42828 80 I
24 42889 i 61
25 , 43009 i 120
,
26 I 43074 65
27 43161 87
28 43230 69
29 43281 51
30 43444 , 163 Maximum Daily Flow
31 43492 , 48 I
,
GRAND TOTAL
(Distribution)
2506
Page 5
Township of Oro-Medonte
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS. 2004
\
Warminster Booster Station
Date Distribution Flow Daily Distribution
Reading (cu.m) Flow (cu.m' Comments
31~May-()4 43492 48
June I
1 43571 79 I
2 43661 90
3 43724 63
4 43816 I 92
5 I 43891 75
6 44049 158
7 44095 46
8 44209 114
9 44305 96
10 44396 I 91
11 i 44507 I 111 I
12 I 44576 69 I
13 I 44827 I 251 i Maximum Daily Flow
14 44889 I 62
15 44991 102
16 45081 90
17 45190 109
18 45288 98
19 ! 45355 67
20 ! 45520 165
21 45573 53
22 45664 91
23 45740 76
24 45834 94
25 45908 74
26 45967 59
27 46141 174 I
28 I 46352 211 I
GRANO TOTAL
(Distribution)
2860
Date I Distribution Flow Daily Distribution
Reading (cu.m) Flow (cu.m) Comments
June I
29 I 244 New flow meter installed
30 I 415 171
GRAND TOTAL
(Distribution)
171
Page 6
.
Township of Oro-Medol1te
MAXIMUM PAIL Y FLOWS - 2004
\
Warminster Booster Station
Date Distribution Flow Daily Distribution
Reading (cu.m) Flow (cu.m) Comments
3o-Jun..04 415 171
July I
1 578 163
2 773 195
3 1065 292
4 1223 158
5 1428 205
6 1637 209
7 1827 190
8 2007 180
9 2193 186
10 2268 75
11 2593 325
12 2748 \ 155 .
13 2909 I 161
14 3058 , 149
15 3303 245
16 I 3435 132
17 3643 208
16 3779 136
19 3990 211
20 4134 144
21 4347 i 213 -
22 4526 i 179
23 4696 I 170
24 4844 I 148 i
25 5335 491 1 Maximum Daily Flow - water main leak. HWY. #12
26 I 5663 326 I
27 5849 186 I
28 6036 187
29 6272 236
30 6520 I 248
31 6696 I 176
GRAND TOTAL
(Distribution)
6261
Page 7
Township of Oro.Medonte
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2004
\
Warminster Booster Station
Date Distribution Flow Daily Distribution
Reading (cu.m) Flow (cu.m1 Comments
31..Jul~04 6696 176
August I I
1 I 6881 I 185
2 1 7067 I 186
3 I 1290 I 223
4 , 7462 172
5 7702 240
6 7880 178
7 7977 97
8 8160 183
9 , 8402 242
10 8630 228
11 8791 161
12 8971 180
13 9141 170
,. 9320 179
15 9482 162
16 9708 226
17 I 9959 251
18 I 10100 141 ,
19 I 10310 I 210
20 ! 10504 194
21 1 10683 179 I
22 10825 142
23 , 11107 282 I Maximum Dail'" Flow
,
24 11317 210 1
25 I 11529 212 I
26 11729 200 I
27 11883 154
28 12068 185
29 12310 242
30 12574 264
31 12763 189
GRAND TOTAL
(Distribution)
6067
Page 8
Township of Oro.Medonte
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS - 2004
Warminster Booster Station
\
Date Distribution Flow Daily Distribution
Reading (cu.m) Flow (cu.m) Comments
31~Aua~04 12763 189
September I
1 I 12933 170
2 13136 203
3 13386 250
4 13527 141
5 13682 , 355 Maximum Daily Flow
6 14028 146 :
7 14254 226
8 14443 189
9 14658 215
10 14847 189
11 14971 124
12 15319 348
13 15436 117
14 15631 195
15 15822 191
16 15999 177
17 16220 221
18 16432 212 I
19 16667 255 I
20 16850 163 :
21 17037 187 I
22 I 17338 301 I
23 17550 212 ,
24 i 17714 164 I
25 17894 180 I
26 18175 281 i
27 I 18298 123 I
28 18523 225
29 18695 172 I
30 I 18948 , 253
GRAND TOTAL
(Distribution)
6185
Page 9
Township of Oro-Medonte
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS. 2004
Warminster Booster Station
Date Distribution Flow Daily Distribution
Reading (cu.m) Flow (cu.m) Comments
3o-.Sep-04 18948 253
October
1 19116 168
2 19266 150
3 19405 139
4 19623 218
5 19789 166
6 19955 166
7 20111 156
8 20308 197
9 20457 149
10 20642 185
11 20791 149
12 21002 211
I 21159 157 i
13
14 21336 177 I
15 21503 167 i
16 21638 135 i
17 21825 187
18 22008 183 I
19 22202 i 194
20 22371 169
21 22533 162
22 22643 110
23 22816 173
24 23060 244 I Maximum Daily Flow
,
25 23203 143 I
26 I 23402 199 I
27 23552 150 I
28 23730 I 178
29 I 23901 171
30 I 24021 120
31 I 24259 238
GRAND TOTAL
(Distribution)
5311
Page 10
Township of Oro-Medonte
MAXIMUM OAIL Y FLOWS. 2004
Warminster Booster Station
\"J-~- 4\
Date Distribution Flow Daily Distribution
Reading (cu.m) Flow (cu.m) Comments
31-0ct~04 24259 238
November
1 I 24377 118
2 24599 222
3 24732 i 133 !
4 24921 189
5 25120 199
6 i 25248 ! 128
7 25487 i 239 i Maximum Daily Flow
8 25650 163
9 25828 178
10 26007 179
11 26165 158
12 26362 197
13 26552 190
14 26733 ! 181
15 26887 154
16 27064 177
17 27204 140
18 27370 ! 166
19 27509 139
20 ! 27628 119
21 27796 168
22 27988 192
23 28159 171
24 28312 153
25 28499 187 !
26 28683 184
27 28855 172
28 29070 215
29 29308 238 !
30 29483 175
GRAND TOTAL
(Distribution)
5224
Page 11
Township of Oro-Medonte
MAXIMUM DAILY FLOWS. 2004
War minster Booster Station
\
Date Distribution Flow Daily Distribution
Reading (cu.m) Flow {cu.m! Comments
3o-Nov..Q4 29483 175
December T T
i I 29647 T 154
2 1 29792 T 145
3 29949 T 157
4 30102 ! 153
5 30360 T 258 Maximum Daily Flow
6 30563 ! 203
7 30710 T 147
8 30855 T 145
9 30962 127
10 31143 161
" 31257 114
12 31445 188
13 31620 , 175
!
14 31762 142
15 31901 139
16 32019 118
17 32172 153
18 32287 115
19 32493 206 !
20 32659 166
21 32767 I 108
22 32942 175
23 33064 122
24 33298 234
25 ! 33497 199 I
26 33666 i 169
27 I 33872 206 I
28 ! 34025 153
29 34258 233
30 34453 195
31 34596 I 143
GRANO TOTAL
(Distribution)
5113
Page 12
@Ontario
)lb~c:.oM--c>L.:I~CL--';:;;T\:i
ACTIONS REQUIRED
SrIISUL..E I
Ministry of the Environment
Drinking Water System Inspection Report
~Co.L~A1nii~~;~;;;C~;{"--""--' . --- ..
\
.
1 The Operating Authority failed to report orally or in written form an observation that indicates
improperly disinfected water may have been directed to the distribution system as required by
Schedules 16-4, 16-6 and 16-7 of O. Reg. 170103. Incidents occurred on November 25,26,29
and December 15 of 2003, and June 28 and 30 of 2004 in which the chlorine free residual
analyser recorded a value of less than 0.2 mglL which is the concentration required by the
Warminster CofA (2457-5U4QRN) at the point of entry to the distribution system.
Action(s) Required: The Operating Authority shall report orally and in written format as
required if, upon review of the data logger information, or any other observation, it is indicated
that the chlorine free residual fell below 0.2 mg/L at Warminster Pump house 2.
2 The Operating Authority failed to take the necessary corrective actions in response to observed
adverse conditions at the facility as required by Schedule 17-2(1 ),(2) of O. Reg. 170103.
Incidents occurred on November 25, 26, 29 and December 15 of 2003, and June 28 and 30 of
2004 in which the chlorine free residual analyser recorded a value of less than 0.2 mglL which is
the concentration required by the Warminster CofA (2457-5U4QRN) at the point of entry to the
distribution system.
3
Action(s) Required: The Operating Authority shall ensure that alarm situations are promptly
responded to, documented and appropriate corrective actions are carried out and documented
to ensure proper disinfection of drinking water is maintained or restored as soon as possible.
The Operating Authority failed to provide a notice of issue resolution including actions taken and
lor results achieved within seven (7) days or otherwise after an adverse condition was resolved
as required by Schedule 16-9(1)a,b of O. Reg. 170103. Incidents occurred on November 25, 26,
29 and December 15 of 2003, and June 28 and 30 of 2004 in which the chlorine free residual
analyser recorded a value of less than 0.2 mg/L which is the concentration required by the
Warminster CofA (2457-5U4QRN) at the point of entry to the distribution system. There were
indications on these dates that improperly disinfected water may have been directed to the
distribution system which is a reportable event as per Schedule 16-4 of O. Reg. 170/03.
.
Action(s) Required: The Operating Authority shall provide notice of issue resolution including
actions taken and results achieved to the Spills Action Centre and Simcoe County District Health
Unit within seven (7) days of an adverse condition being resolved.
4 The Operating Authority has failed to fully comply with Sections 4.1, 5.1 and 5.2 of CofA's 8679-
5P4K6C and 2457-5U4QRN and Schedule "A" of PTTW 92-P-3071. Flow measuring devices
are to be in place at the Warminster facilities which can measure and record instantaneous flow
rates in Umin and pump run times from each source well into the treatment facility. This
capability was not in place at the time of inspection.
Action(s) Required: None. The Municipality has completed the installation of flow measuring
and recording equipment capable of measuring instantaneous flows at the Warminster facility.
5 The Operating Authority has failed to sample sodium in the correct location. Schedule 6-2 of O.
Reg. 170103 requires sodium to be sampled at the point of entry to the distribution system. The
sample collected on December 18, 2003 was collected in the distribution system.
Action(s) Required: The Operating Authority has resampled sodium at the point of entry to the
distribution system as of December 13, 2004.
.
Page 34 of 40
Report Generated for sauerph
on 3/17/2005
~ Ontario
Ministry of the Environment
Drinking Water System Inspection Report
.... """" moo. _........_...__...._."...___.__..__._..._,. ....._..._._.___m_.'....._._....____.._.___._.__.,____...___m......._m_'...'''''__'''''_''''''''_
......___m.__".__...____..__.._..____.._.__"'_.___.______'__"___"".'__
6
The Operating Authority failed to fully document any unusual events, departures from normal
operating procedures, abnormal conditions and the times these event occurred, the lengths of
the events, or the actions taken at the facility as required by Section 20(5) 3, 4, 5 of O. Reg.
435/93.
.
Action(s) Required: The Operating Authority shall record in the facility logbooks the approximate
initial time, time at completion, cause of/for, actions taken, date, staff member(s) present, results
achieved, and location of any operational checks, alarms, tests, repairs, unusual and/or
abnormal conditions and/or directions or adjustments made on or within the Warminster system.
7 The Operating Authority failed to ensure that water treatment equipment is installed at the
Warminster facilities in compliance with CofA 2457-5U4QRN. The chlorine free residual
analyser and the turbidimeter are described in the current CofA as being located in Pumphouse
1 when in actuality, they are properly located in the New Pump house 2 (Booster Station).
Action(s) Required: The Operating Authority shall apply for an amendment to the CofA to
change the locations of the analysers to the correct location by March 31, 2005.
8 The Operating Authority has failed to collect samples within the time frame prescribed by
Schedule 13-6 of O. Reg. 170/03. The prescribed sampling time frame for Trihalomethanes
(THM's) is at least once every three months. In 2003, samples were taken on September 9, and
Decernber 18 which were four months apart. In 2004, samples were taken on February 26, May
31 and September 14 which were four and five months apart respectively.
.9
Action(s) Required: The Operating Authority will ensure that sampling is conducted not more
than three calendar months apart as prescribed.
The Operating Authority has failed to collect samples within the time frame prescribed by
Schedule 13-7 of O. Reg. 170/03. The prescribed sampling time frame for nitrates and nitrites is
at least once every three months. In 2003, samples were taken on September 9 and December
18 which were four months apart. In 2004, samples were taken on February 26, May 31 and
September 14 which were four and five months apart respectively.
Action(s) Required: The Operating Authority will ensure that sampling is conducted not more
than three calendar months apart as prescribed.
10 The Operating Authority has failed to fully comply with Special Condition 15 of PTlW 92-P-3071
which requires that steady-state pumping levels in the production well are recorded monthly.
The Operating Authority has recorded static well levels daily and has only recorded steady-state
pumping levels in Well 1 for 3 of the 15 months during the inspection period (January, June and
November of 2004).
Action(s) Required: The Operating Authority shall immediately begin recording monthly steady-
state pumping well levels for Well 1.
.
......, ...__n__. .._... .....m._"',___ .. ... ....... ....._m.._ __._...__mn.______ ...... .m...._....._m. ,"'.__m,__"'_"
....----...-..------.-..-
,_..a. _._ _ ______._m._....__,..,__
Report Generated for sauerph
on 3/17/2005
Page 35 of 40
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
\)~ -}
PUBLIC MEETING MINUTES
Re: Proposed Official Plan Amendment,
Zoning By-law Amendment and Plan of Subdivision
Application No. 2004-0PA-02, 2004-ZBA-09, 2004-SUB-01
Concession 3, South Part of Lot 15 (Moon Point Corporation>
March 21, 2005 @ 7:19 p.m. at the
Municipal Council Chambers of the Township of Oro-Medonte
Present: Mayor J. Neil Craig
Deputy Mayor Harry Hughes
Councillor Dan Buttineau
Councillor Paul Marshall
Councillor Ralph Hough
Councillor John Crawford
Councillor Ruth Fountain
Staff Present: Andria Leigh, Director of Planning; Janette Teeter, Clerk's Assistant
Also Present: John Miller; Bob Barlow; Terry Allison; Mel Coutanche; Craig Drury;
Jim Woodford; Pat Woodford; Carl & Anna Arnold; Rosemary Moon;
Michael Squires; John & Connie Vandrie; Trisha Thachuk; Stella
Duddy; Janet & Marty Lattay; Steve Emon; Stu Saunders; Bill Moore;
Teresa Rekret; Janet and David Bumstead; Anne Green; Paula
Kirsh; D. Graham; Francis Bowers; Mary O'Farrell-Bowers; Donna
Gowland-Taylor; Robin Taylor; Paul Edmonds; Pam Murfitt; John
MacDonald; Carolyne MacDonald; R. Peer; Y. Pullin; G.B. Murfitt;
Isabelle Thiess; Gary Thiess; Kevin Anderson, Tay Jak Management;
Brandi Clement, The Jones Consulting Group; Bryan Whitehead,
Rural Development Consultants Limited; Jim Hartman, Greenland
International Consulting Ltd.; Geza Gaspardy, Watershed
Management Ecology; Gary Hatt, Mitchell Hat! & Associates Inc.
Mayor J. Neil Craig called the meeting to order and explained the public meeting is to
obtain public comments on proposed amendments to the Official Plan and Zoning By-
Law and Plan of Subdivision Application.
Notice of the Public Meeting was mailed to landowners within 120m of the specified site
on February 23, 2005 and posted on a sign on the subject property on February 23,
2005.
The following correspondence was received at the meeting: City of Orillia dated May
28, 2004; Simcoe County District School Board dated March 10, 2005; Lake Simcoe
Region Conservation Authority dated March 17,2005; Mary Lou Kirby dated March 21,
2005.
- 2-
\
-~
Andria Leigh, Director of Planning, provided an overview of the proposed amendments
to the Official Plan and Zoning By-Law and Plan of Subdivision Application.
The following persons offered verbal comments with respect to the proposed
amendment to the Zoning By-Law: Brandi Clement; Gerry Murfitt, President of
Moonpoint Residents Association (letter dated March 14,2005 fram Barry Peyton,
Provista Group Inc. circulated to Council and Staff); Jim Woodford, Anne Green; Janet
Bumstead (correspondence dated March 21,2005 and correspondence titled Public
meeting circulated to Staff); Pat Woodford; John MacDonald; Michael Squires; Gary
Theiss; Paula Kirsh; Robin Taylor; Mary O'Farrell-Bowers (letter dated March 19,2005
circulated to Staff on behalf of Dr. Mark Rosati and Dr. Margaret Burghardt); Francis
Bowers; Donna Gowland-Taylor; Dr. Emon; Kevin Anderson; Geza Gaspardy; Bryan
Whitehead; Jim Hartman; David Bumstead; Dr. Moore.
The Mayor advised that written submission will be received at the Township office until
April 15, 2005.
There being no further comments or questions, the meeting adjourned at 9:45 p.m.
A tape of the meeting is available for review at the Township Administration Centre, 148
Line 7 South.
Public Meeting Minutes
March 21. 2005
2004.0PA.02. 2004.ZBA.09, 2004.SUB.01
,.
~ lkuct%5'
Mr. Mayor and Oro-Medonte Council:
I wish to formally declare my objection to the By-Law No. 2005-01 I regarding the sale of
Surplus Land.
V-t~
I am in disbelief that the By-Law would have the wording "AND WHEREAS. Council has
received no notice of obiection to the proposed sale of land from anv party.
What did Council believe was the reason for squandering $180,000.00 of the taxpayer's money in
a court case if it was not in objection to the sale of the land?
What did Council believe all of the people who came before Council were saying ifit was not in
objection to the sale of the land?
What did Council believe the last editorial in the Packet and Times to be saying when it called for
the township to give clear answers as to why this prime waterITont real estate was priced so
ridiculously low?
Why did a group of residents pack the Guthrie School Auditorium on this topic if it was not to
raise objection?
Once again here is a partial list of objections to why myself and the land of others will be
prejudicially affected.
Everyone knows that Lake Simcoe is already in trouble. This land sale will add to that problem
because there are no provisions to protect the shoreline. The value of everyone's property is
affected by the health of Lake Simcoe. Surely Council is aware of this, and if not, should contact
the Lake Simcoe Conservation Authority to explain it. A lot of jobs depend on the health of Lake
Simcoe. Losing them will drive down property values.
Higher taxes prejudicially impact on one's land. Land that is arguably worth one milJion dollars is
costing the taxpayers more than 180,000 to get rid of. Not obtaining full market value and
squandering vast sums of money to sell this land has the net effect of having to go to the
taxpayers for more than one mjjjion dollars. People whose families have lived along the
lakeshore for generations are already being forced to move because of higher taxes.
These lands make up 25% of the publicly owned Lake Simcoe waterfront lands. Selling them
reduces the potential access. Reducing access to Lake Simcoe reduces land values.
When I read the statement in the by-law saying that no objectives have been voiced to the
proposed sale of the land from any party I realize that all the efforts that people have made have
fallen on deaf ears. Can any of you honestly raise your hand as elected people who represent the
wishes of the people of Oro-Medonte and show that you truly believe that this precious non-
renewable lakeITont property is surplus to the needs of the Township? Before you raise vour
hand remember it is whether vou honestly believe this land to be surplus that vou are voting on
and nothing else.
John Newell
March 16,2005
~W/~
\1.\'0
Mr. Mayor and Council:
I wish to declare my objection to the By-Law No. 2005-011 regarding the sale of Surplus
Land.
The editorial in the Packet and Times" A bitter harvest of sand" pretty well says it all"
The sale of this land at such ridiculously low price has been a bad move by the Township
destroying our community. The terms of the sale will cause even more rifts among
landowners in Plan 709. With Justice O'Connell's ruling upheld means that anyone who
lives in Plan 709 have the same rights of access regardless of whether they join a
corporation and pay dues or not. This will add another layer of disagreement causing a
rift among backlot owners themselves. I have a friend who lived in Sugarbush who
likens this situation to the one that the Township created there. He moved from
Sugarbush because of the bitterness that this caused.
Who wants to live in a community where there is constant animosity among neighbours?
It drives down the price of properties.
Giving the waterfront owners privileges to construct docks along the waterfront will have
the same effect as legally cutting the backlot owners off from accessing most of the
waterfront. Any backlot owner attempting to exercise their rights to use the easement
along the lake will be made to feel that they are running the gauntlet. The natural
shoreline that they have enjoyed for generations will be infested with docks and concrete.
By selling the land the rights that go with my four lots will in reality be taken away. The
bitterness in the neighbourhood will be increased causing my property to be prejudicially
affected.
It is hard to understand how a Council back in 1929 and every council since that time
could so clearly see the future needs for recreational waterfront land and how the
majority of this Council with all the growth information especially after approving 400
more homes close to the area can be so shortsighted.
Perhaps the reason has to do with the fact that Township employees lived in the
community at the timeand truly valued the needs of future generations. The unelected
individual who seems to be driving this does not live in Oro-Medonte but lives in Barrie
where the city is acquiring all the waterfront possible to make it accessible to all.
Howard Rogers
,
,
(!.fJ
/1/
0.
)
,/~
V
I
If
>pl!~<
f'-'""J
~7~?""",,{M7'~~__
201~1:)'ti.ue
go""""" ()~
.If47/( 6?1t2
\ltc
March 17, 2005
Mayor J. Neil Craig
Township ofOro-Medonte
148 Line 7 S., Box 100
Oro, Ontario
LOL 2XO
Dear Mr. Craig,
As Chair ofthe Community Task Force for Physician Recruitment, I would like to extend our
genuine appreciation for the past financial support of our efforts by the council of the Township
of Oro-Medonte.
We respectfully request that the Council of the Township of Oro-Medonte appoint a member to
the Community Task Force for Physician Recruitment.
If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact myself or our Physician
Recruiter, Pamela Colquhoun, at any time. I can be reached at 705-728-9090 x4116 and Ms.
Colquhoun can be reached at 705-728-9090 x4294.
Q. 'T.rulY.'
.,. . -t=/."-NJJ.../L~~
R.Kellj
Chair, Community Task Force for Physici Recruitment
ce: Task Force Members
RECE-j\lEDl
MAR 2 2 2005
ORO-MEDONTE
TOWNSHIP
AMENDMENTS TO BY-LAW 2005-011
\~(~
\}\~, '\0 C G'0\'\" \ \
\\~f";\ \y \'d-c'OC)
\b'.lOc;
\
Amendments of Main Body of By-Law
AND WHEREAS Council has formally received and considered two notices of
objection to the proposed sale of land
AND WHEREAS the proposed by-law came before Council of The Corporation
of The Township of Oro-Medonte for consideration at its regular meeting on the
16th day of March, 2005 and at that time Council formally received and
considered two notices of objection to the proposed sale of land.
Amendment to Schedule C
5. The By-Law for the sale of the subject lands came before Council of The
Corporation of The Township of Oro-Medonte for consideration at its
regular meeting on the 16th day of March, 2005 and at that time Council
formally received and considered two notices of objection to the proposed
sale of land.
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE -,
BY-LAW NO. 2005-011
A By-law to authorize the Sale of Surplus Land
Block A (Parts 1 to 15, Plan 51 R-31905)
Blocks Band C, Plan 709,
and
Part 16, Registered Plan 51 R-31905
Township of Oro-Medonte
WHEREAS Section 268 of the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c.25, as amended,
authorizes a Council of a municipality to dispose of surplus land in accordance with the
provisions of a by.law passed by the Council, establishing procedures governing the
sale of such land:
AND WHEREAS Council passed By-law No. 2003.125 on the 26'h day of November,
2003, being a By.law to govern the procedure for the sale of land within the Township of
Oro-Medonte, pursuant to Section 268 of the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c.25, as
amended;
AND WHEREAS Council has previously caused notice to be given of its intention to sell
the lands described in Schedule "A" attached, in accordance with the requirements of
Section 268 of the Municipal Act, and the requirements set out in By-law 2003.125;
AND WHEREAS Council has determined that the said land is not required for municipal
purposes, and has by resolution declared the land designated as Blocks A, Band C,
and the westerly 10 feet of Lot 33, Plan 709, Township of Oro-Medonte, County of
Simcoe, more particularly described in Schedule "A" attached hereto, to be surplus to
the municipality;
AND WHEREAS, Council has received no notice of objection to the proposed sale of
land from any party;
AND WHEREAS pursuant to Section 268 of the Municipal Act, S.O. 2001, c.25, as
amended, the Clerk of the Township of Oro-Medonte did cause a Notice of the
proposed By.law to sell the land designated as Block A (Parts 1 to 15, Plan 51 R-
31905); Blocks Band C, and the westerly 10 feet of Lot 33, (Part 16, Registered Plan
51R-31905), Plan 709, Township of Oro-Medonte, County of Simcoe, to be published in
newspapers of local circulation, a copy of which is attached as Schedule "0" to this by-
law;
AND WHEREAS the proposed By-law came before Council of The Corporation of the
Township of Oro-Medonte for consideration at its regular meeting on the 16'h day of
March, 2005, and at that time no person objected to the proposed By-law nor claimed
that his land would be prejudicially affected.
NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Township of Oro.Medonte hereby enacts as
follows:
1. Authorization of Sale Council does hereby authorize the sale of the land
designated as Block A (Parts 1 to 15, Plan 51R-31905); Blocks Band C, and the
westerly 10 feet of Lot 33, (Part 16, Registered Plan 51R-31905), Plan 709,
Township of Oro-Medonte, County of Simcoe, as described in Schedule "A"
attached hereto, to the owners of Lots 30 to 42, Plan 709 and Oro Plan 709
Limited.
2. Saie Price - In accordance with By-law 2003-125, Council hereby sets the sale
price for land designated as Block A (Parts 1 to 15, Plan 51R-31905); Blocks B
and C, and the westerly 10 feet of Lot 33, (Part 16, Registered Plan 51R-31905),
Plan 709, Township of Oro-Medonte, County of Simcoe, at a consideration as set
out in Schedule "B" attached hereto.
\ \0<:\ - ~
3. Execution of Documents - The Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized to sign all
documents to carry out the intent of this By.law.
4. Certificate of Compliance -Schedule "C" attached hereto and forming part of this
By.law is a Certificate of Compliance executed by Marilyn Pennycook, Clerk of
The Corporation of the Township of Oro.Medonte, setting out the procedures
taken for compliance pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Act, 2001.
BY-LAW READ A FIRST AND SECOND TIME THIS 16TH DAY OF MARCH, 2005.
BY-LAW READ A THIRD TIME AND FINALLY PASSED THIS
2005.
DAY OF
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
Mayor, J. Neil Craig
Clerk, Marilyn Pennycook
Schedule "A"
to By-law No. 2005-011 for
The Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte
Block A (Parts 1 to 15, RP 51 R-31905); Blocks Band C, and the westerly 10 feet of
Lot 33 (Part 16, RP 51 R-31905), Plan 709, Township of Oro-Medonte, County of
Simcoe,
lands to be
Conveyed
Part I, 51R.31905
Part 2, 51R.31905
Part 3, 51R.31905
Part 4 & 16, 51R.31905
Part 5, 51R.31905
Part 6, 51R.31905
Part 7, 51R.31905
Part 8, 51R.31905
Part 9, 51R.31905
Part 10, 51R.31905
Being Part of
PIN#58557.0084
Part 11, 51R-31905
Part 12, 51R-31905
Part 13, 51R.31905
Part 14, 51R-31905
Part 15, 51R.31905
Block B, RP 709
Block C, RP 709
Schedule "8"
to By-law No. 2005-011 for
The Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte
lands of Transferee
Lot 3D, Registered Plan 709
PIN#58557.0085(Lt)
Lot 31, Registered Plan 709
PIN#58557.0086(Lt)
lot 32, Registered Plan 709
PIN#58557'0087(Lt)
lot 33, Registered Plan 709
PIN#58557'0088(Lt)
Lot 33, Registered Plan 709
PIN#58557.0088(Lt)
Lot 34, Registered Plan 709
PIN#58557-0089(Lt)
Lot 35, Registered Plan 709
PIN#58557'0090(Lt)
Lot 36, Registered Plan 709
PIN#58557-0091(Lt)
Lot 37, and Part Lot 10
PIN#58557.0092 (Lt)
Ora Plan 709 Limited
Lot 38, Registered Plan 709
PIN#58557'0093(Lt)
Lot 39, Registered Plan 709
PIN#58557.0094(Lt)
Lot 40, Registered Plan 709
PIN#58557'0095(Lt)
Lot 41, Registered Plan 709
PIN#58557.0096(Lt)
Lot 42, Registered Plan 709
PIN#58557-0097(Lt)
Ora Plan 709 Limited
Ora Plan 709 Limited
Sale Price
$6,868.00
$5,000.00
$5,000.00
$1011.00
$3,989.00
$5,000.00
$5,011.00
$5,011.00
$5,000.00
\~O;,-l\
Nominal Consideration
$5,000.00
$5,000.00
$5,000.00
$5,000.00
$6,000.00
Nominal Consideration
Nominal Consideration
\' c'
.~
\ ((, - ' ,
"l~ .. /'
Schedule "c"
to By-law 2005-011 for The Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
IN THE MATTER of the sale of land designated as
Block A (Parts 1 to 15, Plan 51 R-31905); Blocks B
and C, Plan 709, and the westerly 10 feet of Lot 33,
(Part 16, Registered Plan 51 R-31905), Plan 709,
Township of Oro-Medonte, County of Simcoe,
I, Marilyn Pennycook, Clerk of the Township of Oro.Medonte in the County of Simcoe,
certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that:
1, The Corporation of the Township of Oro.Medonte enacted By-law No. 2003.125
on the 26'h day of November, 2003, being a By.law to govern the procedure for
the sale of land within the Township of Oro.Medonte, pursuant to Section 268 of
the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c.25, as amended.
2. By-law No. 2003-125 was in effect at the time the Corporation of the Township of
Oro-Medonte passed the resolution declaring as surplus to the needs of the
municipality, the lands described as:
Block A (Parts 1 to 15, Plan 51R-31905); Blocks Band C, Plan 709,
and the westerly 10 feet of Lot 33, (Part 16, Registered Plan 51R-
31905), Plan 709, Township of Oro-Medonte, County of Simcoe,
3. An appraisal of the fair market value of the surplus lands was obtained.
4. A Notice of the proposal by The Corporation of the Township of Oro.Medonte to
pass a By-law to sell land designated as Block A (Parts 1 to 15, Plan 51R-
31905); Blocks Band C, and the westerly 10 feet of Lot 33 (Part 16, Registered
Plan 51R.31905), Plan 709, Township of Oro-Medonte, County of Simcoe,
described in the said Notice was published in the Barrie Examiner, the Orillia
Packet and Times and the Midland Free Press on March 11, 2005.
5, The By-law for the sale of the subject lands came before the Municipal Council at
its regular meeting on the 16'h day of March, 2005, and at that time, no person or
persons made any claim that his land would be prejudicially affected by the By.
law.
Dated at the Township
of Oro-Medonte, in the County of
Simcoe, this day of 2005.
Marilyn Pennycook, Clerk
Township of Oro.Medonte
Schedule "D"
\\9c -~
to By-law No. 2005-011 lor
The Corporation 01 the Township 01 Oro-Medonte
(i)
THE CORPORATION DF THE' TOWNSHIP Of rnm..MFOONTE
IilltlCE OF SALf' t\F S\\RP\ us u.tID
TAKE NOl"ICE thai The Corporation 01 Qro-MedOfite
proposes 10 pass a By-law to sell surplus lands in the
Township at Oro-MeOO!\w, CowIW o-t S\roc~, mOT&-
particu~rlYdaSCribedlnScheduIB'A.hereto.AdetaUedrnap
of ItIe subject lands is aVilUable at the Township of
Orc-Medonla Administration Office, 148 Line 7 South, Oro.
ANe FURTHER TAKE NOTICE thai the proposed By_law
wilt come belore the Council of The COfP(lration 01 Township
01 Oro-Medonle at lIS regular meeting \0 be held at Ihe
Council Chambern on the 16t\1 oay ot March, 2005 al7:oo
o'clockp.m, end,at lhal lima Council will haar in person or by
his counsel,sollCitoro! agent, any per50n who claims Ihal
his land will be preiudiciallyallacledbylhe By-law.
DATED AT THE TOWNSHIP OF OflO-MEDONTE THIS
101h DAY OF MARCH, 2005.
TOWN6HIP
~~~N;;?
Ma.rilynPe!\rlycock,Clew.
TownshipolOfo-Medonte
SCHEDULE "A"
If.\(\<j$W<p!w>\()'i\<> T<>'iiruilli?<>!O,,:>-~~~,1beII a$
B!Qck A, Regis!~'~d Plan 709 (Geographic Township of Ore). mom
p8l1ICularlydeSCtiOOdaspat!s1,2,3.5,6.7.8.9,11,12,13,14.15
and 16. 511'1.31905 and Block 8 and C, Registered Plan 709.
Township 01 Oro-Mad0f11e,C<>untyol SimcQE. '
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
BY-LAW NO. 2005-021
A By-law to Authorize the Execution of a Site Plan Control Agreement
between The Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte
and 1045942 Ontario Inc. (Ken Hewitt)
described as lands as follows:
Part of the West Y, and SE 1;4 of Lot 1, Concession 14,
Being Parts 1, 2 and 3, 51 R-6268 - Being all of PIN # 58530-0316 (Lt)
Township of Oro-Medonte
WHEREAS authority to enter into Site Plan Control Agreements is provided for in
Section 41 of The Planning Act, R.S.O., 1990, c. P. 13, as amended, and Councii
deems it necessary to enter into a Site Plan Control Agreement on the lands described
herein;
AND WHEREAS By-Law No. 94-149, a By.Law to Designate Parts of the Township as
Site Plan Control Areas, was passed by Council for the Township of Oro-Medonte,
pursuant to the provisions of The Planning Act, R.S.O., 1990, C. P. 13, as amended;
AND WHEREAS the lands referred to in this By.Law are subject to Site Plan Control,
pursuant to By-Law No. 94.149;
NOW THEREFORE the Councii of the Township of Oro-Medonte hereby enacts as
follows:
1. THAT the Township enter into the Site Plan Control Agreement attached hereto as
Appendix "A", on lands described on the attached Schedule "A";
2. THAT the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized to execute the Site Plan Control
Agreement on behalf of the Corporation of the Township of Oro.Medonte;
3. THAT the attached Appendix "A" and Schedules "A, B, C and D" shall form part of
this By-Law;
4. THAT this By-Law shall take effect on the final passing thereof.
BY-LAW READ A FIRST AND SECOND TIME THIS 6TH DAY OF APRIL, 2005.
BY-LAW READ A THIRD TIME AND FINALLY PASSED THIS
2005.
DAY OF
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
Mayor, J. Neil Craig
Clerk, Marilyn Pennycook
APPENDIX "A"
to By-Law 2005-021
SITE PLAN AGREEMENT
- between -
1045942 ONTARIO INC.
(KEN HEWITT)
- and -
THE CORPORATION OF THE
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
DESCRIPTION OF LANDS
Part of the West y, and SE V. of Lot 1, Concession 14
Being Parts 1, 2 and 3, 51 R-6268
Being all of PIN #58530-0316 (Lt)
Roll # 4346-020-004-23200-0000
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
COUNTY OF SIMCOE
March, 2005
By-Law No. 2005- 0 21
Section 1
Section 2
Section 3
Section 4
Section 5
Section 6
Section 7
Section 8
Section 9
Section 10
Schedule "A"
Schedule "B"
Schedule "C"
Schedule "D"
THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
SITE PLAN AGREEMENT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Covenants by the Owner
Covenants by the Township
Development Restrictions
Development Changes
Security
Compliance
Co-operation
Binding Effect
Severability of Clauses
Save Harmless
SCHEDULES
Legal Description of Lands
Site Plan
Deeds and Easements to be Conveyed
Itemized Estimate of Cost of Construction
2
SITE PLAN CONTROL AGREEMENT
This Agreement made, in quadruplicate, this day of
accordance with Section 41 of the Planninq Act.
2005, in
BETWEEN:
1045942 ONTARIO INC. (KEN HEWITT)
Hereinafter called the "Owner"
PARTY OF THE FIRST PART
-and-
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
Hereinafter called the "Township"
PARTY OF THE SECOND PART
WHEREAS the Owner has applied to the Township of Oro-Medonte to permit a
12 m x 24 m shop on lands described in Schedule "A", attached hereto;
AND WHEREAS the Township has enacted a By.law to provide for the designation of the
lands as a "Site Plan Control Area";
AND WHEREAS the Owner intends to develop the lands in accordance with the Site Plan
attached hereto as Schedule "B";
NOW THEREFORE This Agreement Witnesseth THAT in consideration of the mutual
covenants hereinafter contained, the parties hereto hereby covenant and agree as
follows:
3
I
1. COVENANTS BY THE OWNER
The Owner covenants and agrees as follows:
a) The Owner owns the subject lands described in Schedule "A", attached hereto,
and has provided the Township with a Registered Deed containing the legal
description of the subject lands.
b) This Agreement may be registered against title to these subject lands and shall
take priority over any subsequent registrations against the title to the subject lands.
c) No work shall be performed on the lands, nor any use made of the subject lands
with respect to the proposed development, except in conformity with all the
provisions of this Agreement.
d) The Owner shall, prior to the execution of this Agreement, obtain all necessary
permits and approvals from the Township and from all Ministries and Agencies,
including, but not limited to, the County of Simcoe.
e) The Owner shall, prior to the execution of this Agreement, pay all municipal taxes
and charges related to obtaining the approval of these lands for the intended use.
f) The Owner shall pay a refundable deposit for such reasonable costs as may be
involved to the Township in having its solicitor, engineer, planner and staff, perform
any work in connection with this Agreement, including the preparation, drafting,
execution, and registration of this Agreement. The Owner acknowledges and
agrees that the Owner shall be responsible for the cost of performance of all the
Owner's obligations hereunder, unless the context otherwise requires. Every
provision of this Agreement, by which the Owner is obligated in any way, shall be
deemed to include the words "at the expense of the Owner", unless specifically
stated otherwise. The refundable deposit for expenses and actual cost shall be
$1,000.00. The Owner shall replenish the refundable deposit, to its full amount,
when the expenses and actual costs are submitted by the Township.
g) The Owner shall have delivered to the Township, all Transfers/Deeds, Discharges
and Easements, or other documents required by Schedule "C", as well as
certification from the Owner's solicitor that the Transfer/Deeds and Easements
shall provide the Township with good title, free and clear from all encumbrances.
2. COVENANTS BY THE TOWNSHIP
The Township covenants and agrees as follows:
a) That the Township has enacted a By-law to permit a 12 m x 24 m shop described
on the Site Plan.
b) That the Township agrees that subject to compliance by the Owner with all
relevant Municipal By.laws and Provincial Statutes and Regulations, the Owner
may proceed to develop the subject lands, as indicated on the Site Plan attached
hereto as Schedule "B", subject to the development restrictions contained herein.
3. DEVELOPMENT RESTRICTIONS
The Parties hereto acknowledge and agree that any use of the subject lands by the
Owner shall be on and subject to the following terms and conditions:
4
,
, , ,
/ (Ph)
a) Site Plan
The use and development of the subject lands shall be in accordance with and as
set out on the Site Plan, attached hereto as Schedule "B",
b) Liqhtinq
All lighting systems installed outside, such as floodlights, shall be directed away
from any adjacent residential use and/or roadway, not to cause interference in any
way.
c) Parkinq Areas and Drivewavs
All parking areas and driveways shall be constructed in conformity with Sections
5.19 and 5.20 of By-law No. 97.95, as amended, and the Ontario Building Code
Regulation #419/86, and such parking areas, loading, and access areas shall be
kept free and clear of snow and ice and kept adequately drained. All entrances
shall be constructed, as in Schedule "B" attached. The Owner agrees to obtain
all necessary approvals from the Ministry of Transportation, County of Simcoe and
Township of Oro-Medonte.
d) Outside Storaqe
No outside storage shall be permitted between any buildings on the premises and
any street. Any other outside storage shall be contained in the fenced compound,
as identified on Schedule "B".
e) Garbaqe Storaqe
The Owner agrees to provide suitable storage areas for garbage and waste, as
shown on the Site Plan, and to install and maintain litter containers in and around
development on the lands. All metal scrap and associated refuse contained in the
fenced compound shall be removed on a weekly basis.
f) Landscapinq
The Owner shall complete all landscaping and landscaped areas shown on the
Site Plan, attached as Schedule "B", as soon as weather permits, and all grading
and sodding required, according to any Engineering drawings submitted, shall be
done on all lawn areas.
g) Erosion and Siltation Control
The Owner must take all necessary precautions to prevent erosion and
sedimentation of ditches and culverts, slopes, etc., within the Site Plan, and
downstream prior to and during construction. The Owner agrees to maintain all
erosion and siltation control devices in good repair until vegetative cover has been
successfully established.
4, DEVELOPMENT CHANGES
The parties acknowledge and agree that there shall be no changes to this Agreement or
the Schedules attached hereto, unless and until such changes have been approved by all
parties. It is the intention of the parties that material amendments to this Agreement be
properly recorded. Such amendments may take the form of a registered Amending
Agreement, an unregistered Agreement, exchange of correspondence, Memorandum of
Confirmation, or notations on Engineering drawings. The nature of such record of
amendment shall depend on circumstances.
5
It:
5. SECURITY
Prior to signing the Agreement, the Owner will deposit, with the Treasurer of the
Township, to cover the faithful performance of the obligations of the Owner arising under
this Agreement, including but not limited to the construction of the works and services
identified in Schedule "D" to this Agreement (the "said Work"), the following securities:
a) Cash in the amount of one hundred percent (100%) of the estimated cost of the
said work, as approved by the Township Engineer and Township Council, or:
b) An irrevocable Letter of Credit from a chartered bank, issued in accordance with
the requirements of Schedule "E", with an automatic renewal clause in the amount
of one hundred percent (100%) of the estimated costs of the said works, and as
approved by the Township Engineer. The Letter of Credit shall be for a minimum
guaranteed period of one (1) year, or such time as the Township decides, and
shall be renewed automatically, as necessary, thirty (30) days prior to expiration.
c) The Township reserves the right to accept or reject any of these alternative
methods of providing securities. Prior to depositing the securities, the Owner's
Engineer shall submit an estimate of the cost of the works to the Township
Engineer for approval. When the cost estimate has been approved, it will be set
out in Schedule "D" of this Agreement and will become the basis for the limits of
the securities.
d) Any Letter of Credit or security filed with the Township is based upon the estimated
cost of completing the various matters prescribed by this Agreement. However, all
Letters of Credit and security received by the Township may be used as security
for any item or any other matter which, under the terms of this Agreement, is the
responsibility of the Owner, including without limiting the generality of the
foregoing, payment of engineering, legal, planning or other costs incurred by the
Township, which are the responsibility of the Owner, under the terms of this
Agreement.
e) Upon written notification by the Owner's agent, certifying that all required works
for which the Letter of Credit was submitted have been completed in accordance
with the plans submitted and upon confirmation by the Township or its agent that
the Owner's obligations under this Agreement have been completed, the
Township will return said Letter of Credit.
f) If in the event of default of the Owner under any of the provisions of this
Agreement, it becomes necessary for the Township to realize on its security or
deposits, then the Township shall give, by registered mail, twenty-one (21) day's
notice, its intent to draw down on the security or deposit.
6. COMPLIANCE
Any action taken by the Township or on its behalf, pursuant to this Agreement, shall be in
addition to and without prejudice to any security or other guarantee given on behalf of the
Owner for the performance of its covenants and agreements herein, and upon default on
the part of the Owner hereunder, the Township shall, in addition to any other remedy
available to it, be at liberty to utilize the provisions of Section 325 of the Municipal Act,
R.S.O. 1980, Chapter 302, as amended.
7. CO-OPERATION
The Owner consents to the registration of this Agreement by the Township, upon the title
of the subject lands, at the expense of the Owner and agrees to execute such further and
other documents, consents or applications, as required, for the purpose of securing
registration and giving effect to the provisions of this Agreement.
6
8. BINDING EFFECT
!
/:?
This Agreement, and everything contained herein, shall be binding upon the successors
and assigns of the parties hereto, and upon the lands described in Schedule "A", attached
hereto, such Schedule being a legal description of the lands, and it is further agreed that
this Agreement shall be prepared, approved and registered on title.
9. SEVERABILITY OF CLAUSES
Should any section, subsection, clause, paragraph, or provision of this Agreement be
declared by a Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the same shall not affect the
validity of the Agreement as a whole or any part thereof, other than the provision so
declared to be invalid.
10. SAVE HARMLESS
The Owner, on behalf of itself, its successors and assigns, agrees to indemnify and save
harmless, the Township from and against any and all claims, suits, actions and demands
whatsoever, which may arise either directly or indirectly by reason of any work or service
performed by the Township, its servants or sub-contractors in order to complete the work
or services required to be completed under this Agreement, provided the subject matter
of such action, suits, claims or demands was not caused intentionally or through gross
negligence on the part of the Township, its servants or agents or sub-contractors.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereunto have affixed their respective seals
under the hands of their proper officers duly authorized in that behalf.
SIGNED, SEALED AND DELIVERED
7
/}// ~
)> ..//?~/
) Owner: 1045942 Ontario Inc.
) Ken Hewitt
) Has the Authority to Bind the Corporation
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
) The Corporation of the
) Township of Oro-Medonte
)
) per:
)
)
)
) J. Neil Craig, Mayor
)
)
)
) Marilyn Pennycook, Clerk
)
I
SCHEDULE "A"
NOTE:
It is understood and agreed that this Schedule forms part of the Site Plan
Agreement between the Township of Ora.Medonte and 1045942 Ontario
Inc. (Ken Hewitt).
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF LANDS
Part of the West 'h and SE 14 of Lot 1, Concession 14, being Parts 1, 2 and 3, 51R-
6268, being all of PIN #58530-0316 (LI), Roll # 4346-020-004-23200-0000.
8
SCHEDULE "B"
NOTE:
It Is understood and agreed that this Schedule forms part of the Site Plan
Agreement between the Township of Oro-Medonte and 1045942 Ontario
Inc. (Ken Hewitt).
SITE PLAN
Site Plan is not In a registerable form and is available from the Township of Oro.Medonte.
Drawing #E.1332 prepared by Dearden & Stanton Ltd. dated May 3,2004.
9
SCHEDULE "C"
NOTE:
It is understood and agreed that this Schedule forms part of the Site Plan
Agreement between the Township of Oro-Medonte and 1045942 Ontario
Inc. (Ken Hewitt).
DEEDS AND EASEMENTS TO BE CONVEYED
All title documents shall be properly drawn and executed by the parties, with the
appropriate Lot or Block Number inserted in the description of the document, and the
registered Plan Number shall be left blank, to be inserted by the solicitors for the parties
after the Plan is registered and a Plan Number assigned.
The consideration for all conveyances shall be the sum of Two Dollars ($2.001 and the
cost of preparation, execution and registration thereof, shall be bome by the Owner.
All documents to be registered shall be prior approved by the solicitor for the Township.
The following land and easement shall be conveyed:
1.0 LANDS TO BE CONVEYED TO THE TOWNSHIP
N/A
2.0 DRAINAGE EASEMENTS TO BE CONVEYED TO THE TOWNSHIP
N/A
]0
/1 j
_ {Po
SCHEDULE "D"
NOTE:
It is understood and agreed that this Schedule forms part of the Site Plan
Agreement between the Township of Oro-Medonte and 1045942 Ontario
Inc. (Ken Hewitt).
ITEMIZED ESTIMATE OF COST OF CONSTRUCTION
1.
ITEMIZE CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE
AMOUNT
2.
LETTERS OF CREDIT
AMOUNT
Letter of Credit to be provided by the Owner
to ensure completion of all works required
under the terms of this Agreement, as noted
in Sections 5 and 1 f) herein.
$1,000.00
(refundable deposit)
JJ
c)
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF ORO-MEDONTE
BY-LAW NO. 2005-023
Being a By-law to change the zoning on lands within Concession 9,
Part of Lot 10 (Oro) now in the Township of Oro-Medonte
(Plant - Roll # 43-46-010-004-05500-0000)
WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Township of Oro.Medonte is
empowered to pass By.laws to regulate the use of land pursuant to Section 34 of the
Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.P.13.
AND WHEREAS Council deems it appropriate to re-zone the lands to permit the
development of institutional uses, in accordance with Section 02 of the Official Plan
AND WHEREAS Council deems it appropriate to place the subject land in a zone with
permitted uses that are better suited for the subject lot;
NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte
enacts as follows:
1. Schedule 'A13' to Zoning By.law No. 97.95 as amended, is hereby further
amended by changing the zone symbol applying to the lands located in
Concession 9, Part of Lot 10, in the former geographic Township of Oro, now in
the Township of Oro.Medonte, from the Agricultural/Rural (AlRU) Zone to the
Institutional (I) Zone as shown on Schedule 'A.1' attached hereto and forming
part of this By-law.
2. This By.law shall come into effect upon the date of passage hereof, subject to
the provisions of the Planning Act, as amended.
READ A FIRST AND SECOND TIME on the 6th day of April, 2005.
READ A THIRD TIME and finally passed this
day of
,2005.
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
J. Neil Craig, Mayor
Marilyn Pennycook, Clerk
Schedule wA_iw to By-Law
This is Schedule 'A-1' to By-Law 2005-023
passed the day of /J
Mayor
J. Neil Craig ""
N
Clerk
Marilyn pennycook
LANDS SUBJECT TO
THE RE-ZONING
'00 0
CON IX
LOT 10
1,,,,1
Township of Oro-Medonte
)iP
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF ORO-MEDONTE
BY-lAW NO. 2005-024
Being a By-law to change the zoning on lands within Concession 10,
West Part lot 10 (Oro) now in the Township of Oro-Medonte
(Houben - Roll # 43-46-010-004-08700-0000)
WHEREAS Zoning By-law 1997-95 was enacted to regulate the use of land and the
character, location, and use of buildings and structures within the Township of Oro.
Medonte;
AND WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte
deems it appropriate to further amend By-law 1997.95, as amended;
AND WHEREAS this By-law is in conformity with Section 09 of the Official Plan of the
Township of Oro-Medonte;
AND WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Township of Oro.Medonte is
empowered to pass By-laws to regulate the use of land pursuant to Section 34 of the
Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.P.13.
NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Corporation of the Township of Oro.Medonte
enacts as follows;
1. Schedule 'A13' to Zoning By-law No. 97.95 as amended, is hereby further
amended by changing the zone symbol applying to the lands located in
Concession 10, West Part lot 10, in the former geographic Township of Oro,
now in the Township of Oro.Medonte, from the Agricultural/Rural (AIRU) Zone to
the Rural Residential One (RUR1) and Open Space (OS) Zones as shown on
Schedule 'A-1' attached hereto and forming part of this By.law.
2. This By.law shall come into effect upon the date of passage hereof, subject to
the provisions of the Planning Act, as amended.
READ A FIRST AND SECOND TIME on the 6th day of April, 2005.
READ A THIRD TIME and finally passed this
day of
,2005.
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
J. Neil Craig, Mayor
Marilyn Pennycook, Clerk
Schedule 'A_" to By- Law
This is Schedule 'A-1' to By-Law 2005- 024
passed the day of [)
Mayor
J. Neil Craig "S
N
Clerk
Marilyn Pennycook
I
I
1- __
I
z
. ....'Q')
~~~
~~~
~~~
~~~
~~~
~~~
~~~
~~~
~~~
~~~
~~~
I
II
I
OLD BARRIE RO
~.
.....
Z
-----0
...;
-'''--,
w
Z
......
....:J
\ = :! LANDS TO BE REZONED FROM THE
::::: AGRIGUl TURAlfRURAL (A/RU) ZONE TO T
RURAL RESIDENTIAL ONE (RUR1) ZONE
V/::1lANDS TO BE REZONED FROM THE
LLL:J AGRJCUL rURAl/RURAL (AfRU) ZONE TO TH
OPEN SPACE (OS) ZONE
Township of Oro-Medonte
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF ORO-MEDONTE
BY-lAW NO. 2005-025
Being a By-law to change the zoning on lands within Concession 11,
West Part of lot 8, RP 51 R-33214, Part 1 (Medonte) now in the
Township of Oro-Medonte (Duddy - Roll # 43-46-020-003-13201-0000)
WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Township of Oro.Medonte is
empowered to pass By.laws to regulate the use of land pursuant to Section 34 of the
Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.P.13.
AND WHEREAS Council deems it appropriate to re-zone the lands to permit the
development of rural residential uses, in accordance with Section 02 of the Official Plan
AND WHEREAS Council deems it appropriate to place the subject land in a zone with
yard requirements that are better suited for the subject lot;
NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Corporation of the Township of Oro.Medonte
enacts as follows:
1. Schedule 'A21' to Zoning By.law No. 97-95 as amended, is hereby further
amended by changing the zone symbol applying to the lands located in
Concession 11, West Part of Lot 8, RP 51 R-33214, Part 1, in the former
geographic Township of Medonte, now in the Township of Oro-Medonte, from
the Agricultural/Rural (AlRU) Zone to the Rural Residential Two (RUR2) Zone as
shown on Schedule 'A.1' attached hereto and forming part of this By-law.
2. This By.law shall come into effect upon the date of passage hereof, subject to
the provisions of the Planning Act, as amended.
READ A FIRST AND SECOND TIME on the 6th day of April, 2005.
READ A THIRD TIME and finally passed this
day of
,2005.
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
J. Neil Craig, Mayor
Marilyn Pennycook, Clerk
/
,
eJ
Schedule -A-i- to By-Law
This is Schedule 'A-1' to By-Law 2005-025
passed the day of ()
Mayor
J. Neil Craig <os
N
Clerk
Marilyn pennycook
'-o\"?,
..,(1 ~<O
<<;;l>"",,,(/-'-O
~.,
"
,00
r:;F~"'"
,0
,""-,,,<.,0<:-
if"
.00 '00"""'"
, ,
Township of Oro-Medonte
/
-I
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF ORO-MEDONTE
BY-LAW NO. 2005-026
Being a By-law to change the zoning on lands within Concession 4,
West Part of Lot 15 (Oro) now in the Township of Oro-Medonte
(McLean - Roll # 43-46-010-002-084-0000)
WHEREAS the Council of Ihe Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte is
empowered to pass By.iaws to regulate the use of land pursuant to Section 34 of the
Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.P.13.
AND WHEREAS Council deems it appropriate to re-zone the lands to permit the
development of rural residential uses, in accordance with Section 02 of the Official Plan
AND WHEREAS Council deems it appropriate to place the subject land in a zone with
yard requirements fhat are better suited for the subject lot;
NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Corporation of the Township of Oro.Medonte
enacts as follows:
1. Schedule 'A12' to Zoning By.law No. 97-95 as amended, is hereby further
amended by changing the zone symbol applying to the lands located in
Concession 11, West Part of Lot 15, in the former geographic Township of
Medonte, now in the Township of Oro.Medonte, from the Agricultural/Rural
(A/RU) Zone to the Rural Residential Two (RUR2) Zone as shown on Schedule
'A-1' attached hereto and forming part of this By-law.
2. This By.law shall come into effect upon the date of passage hereof, subject to
the provisions of the Planning Act, as amended.
READ A FIRST AND SECOND TIME on the 6th day of April, 2005.
READ A THIRD TIME and finally passed this
day of
,2005.
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHtP OF ORO-MEDONTE
J. Neil Craig, Mayor
Marilyn Pennycook, Clerk
/
Schedule -A-i- to By-Law
This is Schedule 'A-1' to By-Law 2005-026
passed the day of P
Mayor
J. Neil Craig "S
N
Clerk
Marilyn Pennycook
LANDS SUBJECT TO
THE RE.ZONING
100 0 100 Meiers
I. ..1 ,
Township of Oro-Medonte
THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF ORO-MEDONTE
BY-LAW NO. 2005-027
Being a By-law to change the zoning on lands within
Concession 5, Part of Lot 9, RP 51 R-33403, Part 1
(Oro) now in the Township of Oro-Medonte
(Bidwell- Roll # 43-46-010-002-287-0000)
WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Township of Oro.Medonte is
empowered to pass By.laws to regulate the use of land pursuant to Section 34 of the
Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.P.13.
AND WHEREAS Council deems it appropriate to re-zone the lands to permit the
development of rural residential uses, in accordance with Section D2 of the Official Plan
AND WHEREAS Council deems it appropriate to place the subject land in a zone with
yard requirements that are better suited for the subject lot;
NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte
enacts as follows;
1. Schedule 'A12' to Zoning By-law No. 97-95 as amended, is hereby further
amended by changing the zone symbol applying to the lands located in
Concession 11, West Part of Lot 15, in the former geographic Township of
Medonte, now in the Township of Oro.Medonte, from the Agricultural/Rural
(A/RU) Zone to the Rural Residential Two (RUR2) Zone as shown on Schedule
'A-1' attached hereto and forming part of this By-law.
2. This By-law shall come into effect upon the date of passage hereof, subject to
the provisions of the Pianning Act, as amended.
READ A FIRST AND SECOND TIME on the 6th day of April, 2005.
READ A THIRD TIME and finally passed this
day of
,2005.
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
J. Neil Craig, Mayor
Mariiyn Pennycook, Clerk
Schedule 'A-1' to By-Law
This is Schedule 'A-1' to By-Law 2005-027
passed the day of f
Mayor
J. Neil Craig 'OS
N
Clerk
Marilyn Pennycook
,,'
(P:o(,~
,,0
100 1QQMatero
Township of Oro-Medonte
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
BY-LAW NO. 2005-028
Being a By-law to Amend By-law 98-97, a By-law to Designate
Areas of the Township as Site Plan Control Areas
WHEREAS the Official Plan of the Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte was
approved by the Minister of Municipal Affairs on August 15, 1997;
AND WHEREAS Council for the Corporation of the Township of Oro.Medonte
established Site Plan Control policies In the Official Plan for the Township;
AND WHEREAS Section 41(2) and 41(3) of The Planning Act, R.S.O 1990 c. P. 13, as
amended provides that where In an Official Plan an area is shown or described as a
proposed Site Plan Control area, the Council of the local Municipality may designate the
whole or any part of such area as a Site Plan Control area and further that Site Plan
Control areas may be designated on the basis of their zone category in the Township's
Zoning By-law;
AND WHEREAS Council deems it advisable to provide for Site Plan Control areas in
order to provide for the orderly development of commercial, industrial and other special
areas within the Township;
NOW THEREFORE the Council for the Corporation of the Township of Oro.Medonte
hereby enacts as follows;
1. That Section 2 of By-law 98-97 is hereby amended with the addition of the
following subsection:
"2.6 The following property Is designated as a Site Plan Control area In
accordance with Section 41 of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.P. 13, as
amended:
Concession 3, South Part of Lot 17 (Orillia), Roll Number 43-46-030-012-
43100.0000."
BY-LAW READ A FIRST AND SECOND TIME THIS 6th DAY OF APRIL, 2005.
BY-LAW READ A THIRD TIME AND FINALLY PASSED THIS DAY OF
2005.
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
Mayor - J. Neil Craig
Clerk - Marilyn pennycook
\~\-\
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
BY-LAW 2005-029
Being a By-law to Adopt
Amendment No. 19 to the Official Plan
WHEREAS The Corporation of the Township of Oro.Medonte is empowered to Amend
its Official Plan as required;
AND WHEREAS the process for considering such an Amendment was in accordance
with Section 17 and 21 of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990 c.P 13.
AND WHEREAS the amendments to the Official Plan are deemed to be appropriate and
in the public interest:
NOW THEREFORE it is resolved that:
1. Amendment number 19 to the Official Plan, attached hereto as Schedule 'A.1"
and forming part of this By. Law, is hereby adopted and;
2. This by. law shall come into force and take effect as specified in the Planning Act
R.S.O. 1990, c.P. 13.
READ A FIRST AND SECOND TIME on the 6th day of April, 2005.
READ A THIRD TIME and finally passed this
day of
,2005.
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
J. Neil Craig, Mayor
Marilyn Pennycook, Clerk
Schedule 'A-i'
Official Plan Amendment 19
Township of Oro-Medonte
This is Schedule' A-1' to By-Law 2005-029
passed the day of , 2005,
J. Neil Craig, Mayor
Marilyn Pennycook, Clerk
Lake Simcoe
100 0 100 Me1SfS
1",,1 I
Legend
. Lands to be Re-Designated from Restricted Rural
~ To Shoreline
\~\ -
OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 19
(COOKE APPLICATION)
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
Township Application # P159/03
MARCH 8, 2005
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CONSTITUTIONAL STATEMENT
2
PART I:
THE INTRODUCTION
3
1.0
BACKGROUND
3
2.0
LOCATION
3
3.0
BASIS FOR THE AMENDMENT
3.1 Description of Proposal
3.2 Official Plan Context
3.3 Planning Issues
3.4 Conclusion
3
3-4
4
PART II
THE AMENDMENT
5
PART III THE APPENDICES
Appendix A: Planning Report PD 2005-014 dated March 8, 2005
Appendix B: Environmental Impact Study prepared by Azimuth Environmental Consulting Inc,
dated August 2004
Appendix C: Addendum Report prepared by Azimuth Environmental Consulting Inc. dated
January 12, 2005
Appendix D: Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority correspondence
dated January 28, 2005.
Appendix E: County of Simcoe correspondence dated January 11, 2005
BY-LAW 2005-
The Corporation of the
Township of Oro-Medonte
Being a By-law to Adopt
Amendment No. 19 to the Official Plan
WHEREAS The Corporation of the Township of Oro.Medonte is empowered to Amend its Official
Plan as required:
AND WHEREAS the process for considering such an Amendment was in accordance with
Section 17 and 21 of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990 c.P 13.
AND WHEREAS the amendments to the Official Plan are deemed to be appropriate and in the
public interest:
NOW THEREFORE it is resolved that:
1.
Amendment number 19 to the Official Plan, attached hereto as Schedule 'A-1"
and forming part of this By-Law, is hereby adopted and:
2.
This by-law shall come into force and take effect as specified in the Planning Act
R.S.O. 1990, c.P. 13.
Read a first and second time on the
day of March, 2005
Read a third time and finally passed this _ day of March, 2005
Mayor - J. Neil Craig
Clerk - Marilyn pennycook
Official Plan Amendment 19
(Cooke Application)
Township of Oro-Medonte
Page 1
March 8, 2005
\\.Q\ -
CONSTITUTIONAL STATEMENT
Part I: The Introduction, provides general information regarding the general policy
update. Part I: The Introduction does not constitute an operative part of
Amendment No. 19 to the Official Plan.
Part II: The Amendment, provides the details of the Official Plan Amendment. Part
II: The Amendment, including Schedule A constitute the operative part of
Amendment No. 19 to the Official Plan.
Part III: The Appendices, provide more specific information regarding the Amendment
and the background work that led to the preparation of the Amendment. Part III:
The Appendices do not constitute an operative part of Amendment No. 19 to the
Official Plan.
Official Plan Amendment 19
(Cooke Application)
Township of Oro-Medonte
Page 2
March 8, 2005
\
PART I: THE INTRODUCTION
(this is not an operative part of Official Plan Amendment No. 19)
1.0 BACKGROUND
The intent of this Amendment is to place certain lands in South Part of Lot 17, Concession 3
(Orillia) in a Shoreline designation to permit the creation of three residential lots by consent.
2.0 LOCATION
This Amendment affects 1.82 hectares (ha) of land in the South Part of Lot 17, in Concession 3
(Orillia).
3.0 BASIS
A comprehensive Planning Report on the application to amend the Official Plan is contained
within Appendix 1 to this Amendment.
3.1 Description of Proposal
This amendment would re.designate a portion of the South Part of Lot 17, Concession 3 (Orillia)
from the Restricted Rural designation to the Shoreline designation. Once re-designated this
would allow for the consideration of applications to create three residential lots each having 45.72
metres (150 Feet) of lot frontage, 134.11 m (440 It) of lot depth and 0.6 ha (1.5 acres) of lot area
with driveway access available from Moon Point Road.
3.2 Official Plan Context
The Township Official Plan designates the subject lands as Restricted Rural. The applicant
wishes to re-designate these lands in accordance with the policies in Section D10.3.8 by
expanding the limits of the shoreline development area.
3.3 Planning Issues
Section D10.3.8 of the Official Plan contains policies that allow for the expansion of the shoreline
development area onto lands not designated Shoreline through the consideration of an Official
Plan Amendment. The expansion is required to be small in scale and is considered to be infilling.
Infilling being defined as development that abuts a developed area on two sides and/or is located
within a block of land that is surrounded by public roads on at least three sides. The proposed
expansion must also satisfy the following criteria:
a) The lots will have an area of 0.6 hectares or greater;
b) The majority of the existing tree cover on the proposed lots is retained and protected as part
of the approvals process;
Official Plan Amendment 19
(Cooke Application)
Township of Oro-Medonte
Page 3
March 8, 2005
c) The development is compatible, in terms of scale, density and character, with existing
development;
d) The proposed lots, if located on the shoreline, have a water frontage of no less than 45
metres; and,
e) The lots would conform to the general subdivision and consent policies of this Plan.
An analysis of these policies as they apply to the application is contained within Appendix 1 to
this Amendment.
3.4 Conclusions
It is Council's opinion that the applicants have supplied enough supporting information to allow for
a fairly complete assessment of whether establishing the principle of development for the creation
of three residential lots is appropriate.
Official Plan Amendment 1 9
(Cooke Application)
Township of Oro-Medonte
Page 4
March 8, 2005
\
PART II: THE AMENDMENT
(This is the operative part of Official Plan Amendment No. 19)
ITEM # 1
Schedule A8 is amended by re-designating the lands shown on Schedule A-1 attached from the
Restricted Rural designation to the Shoreline designation.
Official Plan Amendment 19
(Cooke Application)
Township of Oro-Medonte
Page 5
March 8, 2005
\
PART III: THE APPENDICES
Appendix A: Planning Report PD 2005-014 dated March 8, 2005
Appendix B: Environmental Impact Study prepared by Azimuth Environmental Consulting Inc,
dated August 2004
Appendix C: Addendum Report prepared by Azimuth Environmental Consulting Inc. dated
January 12, 2005
Appendix D: Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority correspondence
dated January 28, 2005.
Appendix E: County of Simcoe correspondence dated January 11 , 2005
Official Plan Amendment 19
(Cooke Application)
Township of Oro-Medonte
Page 6
March 8, 2005
\
I
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
REPORT
Dept. Report No. To: Prepared By:
PD2005-014 Planning Advisory Andria Leigh, RPP
Committee
Subject: Department:
Council Planning
Lester and Cristina Cooke,
C.ofW. Development Application Date: March 8, 2005
P-159/03
Motion # Concession 3, South Part R.M. File #:
of Lot 17 (Orillia) D09 013294
Date: RolI#:
030-012-43100-0000
II BACKGROUND:
~
The purpose of this report is to review this application subsequent to the Public Meeting held on
January 15, 2005 and provide a recommendation on the Official Plan Amendment applying to lands
within the South Part of Lot 17, Concession 3 (Orillia) owned by Mr. And Mrs. Cooke. A planning
report was presented to the Planning Advisory Committee in September 2004 which recommended
proceeding to the pUblic meeting on the basis that the technical information required with the
application (EJS) had been received and reviewed internally.
At the present time, the lands are designated Restricted Rural in accordance with the Official Plan
and zoned Agricultural/Rural (AlRU) by Zoning By-law 97-95. The policies of the Restricted Rural
designation do not permit the creation of new lots by severance on the praperty and as a result, a
change to the Official Plan designation is required. The intent of the Zoning By-law change is to
implement the changes to be made to the Official Plan and to implement the recommendations of the
EIS and comments contained in the January 12, 2005 LSRCA correspondence.
J POLICY CONTEXT:
II
In December 2004, Council adopted an amendment to Section D10 - Shoreline designation that
proposed to replace the current policies that restricted expansion of the shoreline area and implement
criteria for evaluating the OPA required in the policies to permit such an expansion. This amendment
was approved by the County on February 9, 2005, no appeals have been received, and this
amendment is now in force and effect. The revised policies are as follows:
, I
\ \..Ii '\ ~
"The further expansion of the shoreline development area onto lands that are not designated Shoreline
is not permitted by this Plan. Exceptions may be granted through the approval of an Official Plan
Amendment if the expansion is small in scale and is focused on the shoreline or is considered to be
infilling. Infilling is defined as development that abuts a developed area on two sides and/or is located
within a block of land that is surrounded by public roads on at least three sides. The creation of strip
development across from existing development on existing public roads is not contemplated by this
Plan.
Council may consider such minor amendments to the Official Plan to re-designate lands' for such limited
shoreline development, provided Council is satisfied that:
a) The lots will have an area of 0.6 hectares or greater;
b) The majority of the existing tree cover on the proposed lots is retained and protected as part of the
approvals process;
c) The development is compatible, in terms of scale, density and character, with existing development;
d) The proposed lots, if located on the shoreline, have a water frontage of no less than 45 metres; and,
e) The lots would conform to the general subdivision and consent policies of this Plan.
For Plans of Subdivision that involve the creation of lots with water frontage, only a single tier of lots
shall be created, all with water frontage, as set out in Section D10.3.6 of this Plan. In addition, no new
lots with direct access to County Roads are permitted.
If major development is proposed (which is defined as development that does not meet the above
criteria), a detailed review of the entire shoreline area shall be carried out to determine if the proposed
location is suitable and appropriate from a growth management perspective."
The policy does indicate that a number of issues have to be reviewed to determine the suitability of
an amendment including: environmental suitability, servicing feasibility, impact on character and
traffic impacts.
With respect to (a) and (c) above, the three lots proposed all satisfy this requirement being 0.6
hectares (1.5 acres) in lot area and are larger than the existing developed area along Moon Point
Drive and their location would be compatible with the scale and density of the existing development,
particularly as Moon Point Drive is a fully developed shoreline residential area.
In terms of (b) above, the area of the three lots is limited in terms of existing tree cover. The area
surrounding the watercourse does contain tree cover that will be protected with the implementation of
an Environmental Protection (EP) zone. A by-law that would establish this property as an area
subject to Site Plan Control is attached for the Committee's reference and if is recommended that this
by-Jaw be given favorable consideration by Council in order to ensure that the recommendations of
the EIS are implemented though the Zoning By-law and the Site Plan Control process. The
applicants have applied for the Zoning By-law Amendment that would implement the development
proposal; however it is the Township's practice not to approve such an amendment until the
corresponding OPA has a decision from the County of Simcoe. The zoning by-law amendment will
be required to identify an Environmental Protection area that incorporates the 30 metre buffer of the
water course identified in the Azimuth report and required by the LSRCA in their January 28, 2005
letter.
The proposed lots are not located on the shoreline and therefore subsection (d) of the policies is not
applicable.
The three proposed lots would confirm with the general consent policies as the lots have frontage on
a year round road maintained by a public authority, are not located in an area that will cause a traffic
hazard, can be appropriately services with individual well and septic systems and would therefore
- 2 -
\\9'1-\1
confirm with subsection (e) identified above. The applicants will have to apply to the Committee of
Adjustment for the creation of the three lots once the Official Plan Amendment is approved by the
County of Simcoe.
On the basis of the comments above, it is my opinion that the proposed development is in conformity
with the above criteria.
t SUMMARY OF PUBLIC MEETING COMMENTS:
,
A Public Meeting occurred on January 17, 2005 at that time written comments were received from:
Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority, J.V. & L.E. Winterton, Clair Jazbec, Simcoe County
District School Board, County of Simcoe, J.W. Davies, Greg Stewart, Ralph & Kelly Dominelli,
Salvatore Dominelli, Craig Cotton, Randy Kitchen, Tom Kovacs, and Jim Skentos.
Subsequent to the Public Meeting written comments have been received from: James Seligman, Jay
Harris, and A. Steinberg.
Copies of the correspondence requiring discussion in this report are attached for the Committee's
review. All the other correspondence received indicated that they were in support of the application
as submitted.
The four letters that require discussion include:
1. Claire Jazbec
indicated her concern that the home of the abundant animal species on the site would be lost
with a continued decrease in natural vegetation
ecological impact on the watercourse that runs through the property and into Lake Simcoe
The Township had requested the completion of an Environmental Impact Study (EIS) for the
subject property even though the watercourse located on the property is not currentfy within an
Environmental Protection zone. The EIS was also required since a portion of the property was
wooded and the impact of development on this vegetation area needed to be determined.
This study was prepared by Azimuth Enviranmental Consulting Inc on behalf of the applicant and
submitted to the Township on August 24, 2004 and an addendum was received on January 12,
2005 that addressed previous correspondence from Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority.
A site visit of the subject property was conducted on June 21, 2004 to identify the features and
functions of the natural environment on the site. The EIS identifies two current conditions on-site
(i) an open area void of treed vegetation in the southern western portion of the property and (ii) a
forested area located in both the east and northern portion of the property which also contains the
watercourse. The study indicates that all development activities on the site related to the
development of residential lots have the potential to affect the natural environment on the site. On
this basis the report recommends that there be special zoning by-law provisions to restrict the
building envelope on the site to the southern portion of the property consistent with the extent of
the existing cleared lands, and no disturbance should occur beyond the recommended 38 metre
from the south creek bank in order to permit the maintenance of the watercourse and associated
swamp. The study also recommends the implementation of appropriate protection measures
related to the site construction re: erosion and runoff. The recommendations of the EIS will be
implemented through a site specific zoning by-law amendment and the Site Plan Control process
as identified above.
- 3 -
2. James Selia man
\\9i ~ \
- was originally agricultural area with wetland area - amendment already given to allow one home on
subject property now another amendment being requested for three more homes
. filling of subject property - benefiting from creation of lots in filled area
- no water access for lots created - concern about trespass on private property
- drainage - potential for impact on neighbouring properties
- property values and taxes
The subject property is currently zoned Agricultural/Rural (AIRU) in Zoning By-law 97-95 and has
been since November 5, 1997. The lot was previously zoned Urban Fringe in the former Township of
Orillia Zoning By-law 1993-50. Both of these zoning provisions allowed for the single detached
dwelling that was constructed on the lot in 2001 with a building permit. No Official Plan or Zoning By-
law Amendment was required for the issuance of the building permit. Also as indicated previously,
there is currently no portion of the property that is zoned environmentally protected and none was
previously zoned in the former Township of Orillia by-law either. The applicant has now applied for an
amendment in accordance with the policies as reviewed above.
There has been fill placed on the subject property. The Township does not have a by-law that restrict
fill in agricultural/rural areas and therefore the placement of the fill would not contravene a municipal
by-law. However the applicant's consultant was required to review the filled area to determine any
issues related to the development of the three residences with associated services in this area. The
Azimuth report indicates that the existing fill is comprised of clay mixed with some gravel and has not
resulted in any significant erosion from the property. The existing slope is considered stable
indicating that the fill type and slope are suitable for the development on the praperty. The study did
recommend the implementation of appropriate protection measures related to the site construction re:
erosion and runoff which will be implemented through the site plan control process and have been
supported by the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority who will be consulted through the Site
Plan process.
The Official Plan policy discourages development in the shoreline area where residents will not have
access to the Lake; but does not preclude development from occurring. It should be noted that there
are currently road allowances to the lake that would offer the three new residential lots access to
Lake Simcoe.
Lot grading and drainage during and after construction would be reviewed through the site plan
control process and subsequently implemented through the building permit process. A property
owner is required to maintain existing drainage conditions from pre-development after
development/construction is completed. On this basis the impact on neighbouring properties would
be addressed.
The proposal is for three additional residential lots in an area that already contains residential
dwellings. The lot areas maintain the character of the existing residential community and therefore
would not appear to affect property values.
3. Jav Harris
- was originally agricultural with wetland area - amendment to allow one home now another
amendment for three more homes
- filling of subject property - benefiting from creation of lots in filled area
- no water access - illegal access across private property
- drainage - impact on neighbouring properties
- 4 -
1-
The comments noted above for Mr. Seligman would also apply to the similar comments raised by Mr.
Harris.
4. A. SteinberQ
_ was originally agricultural with wetland area - amendment to allow one home now another
amendment for three more homes
- filling of subject praperty - benefiting from creation of lots in filled area
- no water access - illegal access across private property
- drainage - impact on neighbouring properties
- property values and taxes
The comments noted above for Mr. Seligman would also apply to the similar comments raised by
Ms. Steinberg.
~ OPTIONS:
I
On the basis of the above, Planning Advisory Committee has two options:
Option 1 - Adopt Official Plan Amendment
If this option was selected, the Official Plan Amendment document would be presented to Council for
consideration of adoptions.
Option 2 - Refuse the Application
If this option was selected, the application would be refused and the applicant would then have the
ability to appeal that refusal to the Ontario Municipal Board.
~ CONCLUSIONS:
II
It is my opinion that the proposal is small in scale and generally satisfies the intent of the Shoreline
policies contained in the Official Plan. The Environmental Impact Study has been completed and
supports the proposed form of development on the site and the limited number of residential lots to
be developed with private wells and sewage systems and has been supported, in writing, by the Lake
Simcoe Region Conservation Authority. On this basis, it is recommended that Option 1 be selected
and that it be recommended to Council that favorable consideration be given to Official Plan
Amendment #19 for Lester and Cristina Cooke on lands described as Concession 3, South Part of
Lot 17 (Orillia). And further, it be recommended that the By-law to designate these lands as an area
subject to Site Plan Contral area be given favorable consideration by Council.
- 5 -
~ RECOMMENDATIONS:
1 i
- 1\0
~
It is recommended:
1. THAT Report PD 2005-014 (Cooke) be received and adopted; and
2. That the Planning Advisory Committee recommend to Council that Official Plan Amendment
No. 19, Part of the East Half of Lot 9, Concession 14 (Oro), submitted by Lester and Cristina
Cooke be considered favorably for adoption: and
3. That the Planning Advisory Committee recommend to Council the favorable consideration of a
by-law to designate Concession 3, South Part of Lot 17 (Or/Ilia), as an Area of the Township
subject to Site Plan Control.
Respectfully Submitted,
-1~-t~
Andria Leigh, MCIP, RPP
Director of Planning
C.A.O. Comments:
Date:
C.A.O.
Dept. Head
- 6 -
,,/
-@-
/' "
T
'1 -I
,
Cooke EIS
South Part Lot 17. Concession 3
Township of Oro-Meaonte
Prepared For:
L.R. Cooke Construction
Prepared By:
Azimuth Environmental
Consulting, Inc.
August 2004
ABC 04-124
\ RE~~~~~D I
'I' ORO-MEDONTE \
TOWNSHIP
,
,,/
-@ZIMUTH ENVIRONMENTAL
/ I" CONSULTING, INC.
\~\~
Environmental Assessments & Approvais
August 23, 2004
AEC 04-124
L. R. Cooke Construction
c/o
Lester Cooke
18 Moon Point Dr
Orillia, ON L3V 6Hl
Attention: Mr. L. Cooke
Re: Environmental Impact Study
Development Application, Concession 3, South Part of Lot 17 (OriIlia)
Dear Mr. Cooke;
Azimuth is pleased to provide our Environmental Impact Study for the abovementioned
property to assist in the acquisition of a Development Application for Official Pian and
Zoning By-law Amendments. As requested, three copies of the report are endosed such
that two may be forwarded to the Township for review.
Should you wish to discuss the material provided or require additional infonnation,
please don't hesitate to contact us.
Yours truly,
AZIMUTH ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING INC.
~ t\-('l~\
Sara Murphy, B.Sc.,
Aquatic Biologist
SMM:
111 Saunders Road, Unit 2, Barrie, Ontario L4M 6E7
telephone: (705) 721-8451: fax: (705) 721-8926 info@azimuthenvironmentaLcom
",/
-@-
/' ,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Cooke EIS, Town ofOrillia
Township of Oro-Medonte
\~\ ~
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Letter of transmittal
page
1.0 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................1
2.0 STUDY APPROACH ................................................................................................ 1
3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS ....................................................................................... 2
3.1 Land Use ..................................................................................................................2
3.1.1 On-Site Land .Use............................................................................................. 2
3.1.2 Adjacent Land Use............................................................................................ 3
3.2 Soils and Topography .............................................................................................. 3
3 .3 Watercourses............................................................................................................ 3
3.4 Fisheries................................................................................................................... 4
3.5 Vegetation ................................................................................................................. 5
3.6 Wi]dlife ................................................................................. ................................... 7
4.0 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ............................................................................... 8
5.0 IMPACT ASSESSMENT ..........................................................................................8
5.] Land Use ................................................................................. .... .... ......................... 8
5.1.1 On-Site Land Use..............................................................................................8
5.].2 Adjacent Land Use............................................................................................ 9
5.2 Soils and topography................................................................................................9
5 .3 Watercourse.. ...... ....... ...... ........... .... .... .... ....... .................. ....... ....... '" ....... .... ... ......... 9
5.4 Fisheries... ...... .......... ....... ............... ...................... ....................... .............. ............. ] 0
5.5 Vegetation..............................................................................................................]]
5.6 Wildlife. ........................... ........... ... .................................. ...................................... 1]
6.0 MITIGATION .......................................................................................................... 11
7.0 CONCLUSIONS ......................................................................................................12
8.0 REFERENCES......................................................................................................... 14
List Of Fhmres
Figure ]: Study Area
Figure 2: Township ofOro-Medonte Official Plan Schedule A8
Figure 3: Property Features Mapping
Photol!rauhs
Photographs 1-4
,,/
-@-
/"' '
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Cooke EIS, Town ofOri1Jia
Township of Oro-Medonte
Azimuth Environmental Consulting (Azimuth) was retained by L.R. Cooke Construction
to undertake an Environmental hnpact Study (EIS) for three 1.5 acre parcels of land
located at South Part of Lot 17, Concession 3 in the Town ofOrillia, Township ofOro-
Medonte. The property is comprised of three lots that front onto Moon Point Drive to the
south, and Woodland Drive to the west. The location of the study area is shown on
Figure 1.
The three lots are currently designated Restricted Rural in the Township of Oro-
Medonte's Official Plan (OP) (Februmy, 2001), and zoned Agricultural/Rural in Zoning
By-law 97-95 adjacent to lands designated Shoreline (Figure 2). Policies for the
Restricted Rural designation do not permit the creation of new lots adjacent to Shoreline
Area's, therefore, an Amendment to the OP or to the Zoning By-law is required to permit
the proposed development. The Township has requested that an EIS be completed for
this property to address the requirement for an Amendment, and to address the
Township's criteria for new development proposals adjacent to the designated developed
Shoreline.
The purpose of the EIS is to identify the existing natural environmental features on the
property and the potential impacts that may be associated with the development. A
watercourse that traverses the rear of the property is considered an environmentally
sigrrificant feature (Section F1.2, OP, 2001) however it not designated within the
Environmental Protection Two designation. This feature will be addressed in the EIS.
The EIS will focus on all aspects of a natural environment within the lands proposed for
development including topography, aquatic resources, vegetation communities, potential
habitat for wildlife, and associated features and functions on the property. The BIS will
recommend an appropriate environmental mitigation strategy to ensure that the areas of
the property identified as sigrrificant are preserved in the final development plan.
2.0 STUDY APPROACH
Azimuth completed a field investigation of the property on June 21, 2004 to identify the
features and functions of a natural environment that could potentially be impacted by the
proposed development of the three Jots. Azimuth completed the following activities to
fulfill objectives of this study:
· Conducted a background information search and review of existing relevant
documents that address lands within the study area and the portion of the
property proposed for development;
\
,,/
-@-
,/ , ,
Cooke EIS, Town ofOriHia
Township of Oro-Medonte
· Requested background infonnation from the Ministry of Natural Resources
(MNR) and Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority (LSRCA) relating to
the watercourse on the property;
· Investigated and assessed the existing environmental features within and
adjacent to the lands proposed for development, including the watercourse,
fisheries, vegetation and wildlife;
· Assessed the potential impacts of the proposed conceptual development plan
on sensitive or significant environmental features as described above;
· Developed an appropriate avoidance/mitigation/restoration strategy to address
the potential environmental impacts; and
· Prepared one draft and one final report documenting the abovementioned
activities for review and comment.
3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS
3.1 Land Use
3.1.1 On-Site Land Use
The three lots are currently designated Restricted Rural in the Township's Official Plan
(OP Schedule A8, 1997, appended), and zoned AgriculturallRural in Zoning By-law 97-
95, therefore an Amendment to the OP or to the Zoning By-law is required to pennit the
proposed residential development. The property is also immediately adjacent to the area
designated Shoreline, requiring that the development satisfy the requirements for a new
plans of subdivision under Section D 10.3.6 of the OF.
As shown on Figure 3, the proposed lots will each have a frontage of 45.7m (150') and
depth of 133m (440'). The land is currently comprised of an open area void of treed
vegetation located in the southern western (frontage) portion of the property (photograph
I), and a forested area located in both the east, and northern portions of the property.
The proposed westerly lot that fronts Moon Point Drive has been historically cleared of
vegetation and filled to elevate the property to that of the adjacent roadway. It is
estimated, based on site conditions, that clearing occurred approximately five years ago
(not confinned) and is currently comprised of a mix of exposed soils and herbaceous
vegetation. The clearing extends approximately 81m (266') from Moon Point Drive
northerly (Figure 3). L.R. Cooke Construction is proposing that the footprint of the
proposed residences be located at the southerly portion of the property, which for Lot I
and part of Lot 2, is within this cleared area.
2
\
\
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
1
I
I
Cooke EIS, Town ofOrillia
Township ofOro-Medonte
An unnamed watercourse traverses the rear of the property, flowing from west to east
discharging to Lake Simcoe on the east side of Moon Point Drive (Figure 2 and 3,
Photograph 2). The channel banks are low such that the surrounding flat topography
functions to provide flood relief.
\~\ -J
The property is not located within the area of the Township ofOro-Medonte identified as
Environmental Protection Two (Township OP, 2001), and is not within the Greenlands
Designated Area for County of Simcoe (Gartner Lee, 1996).
3.1.2 Adiacent Land Use
The lands to the north of the property are treed to John Moon Road (Figures 1 and 3).
Lands to the north of John Moon Road, and west of Moon Point Drive are used for
agricultural pwposes. South and east of the property are currently developed as seasonal
and permanent residences within the Shoreline Land Use Designation Area adjacent to
Lake Simcoe.
3.2 Soils and Topography
Orillia is located within the Simcoe Lowlands physiographic region that borders
Georgian Bay and Lake Simcoe, with the western shores of Lake Simcoe included in the
Lake Simcoe basin (Chapman and Putnam, 1984). The southern part of the Township of
Orillia lies within a flat clay plain interrupted by limestone outcrops, glacial hills and
patches of sand and gravel (Chapman and Putnam, 1984). During the development of the
existing house on the adjacent property to the east hardpan ciay was encountered
indicating that the soils comprise a low permeability stable layer at depth.
The topography of the three lots slopes northward to the watercourse, with the highest
point of elevation located at the intersection of Woodland Drive and Moon Point Drive
(Figure 3). The existing residence to the east is also at a higher elevation and slopes in a
general north west direction to the watercourse. The topography at the watercourse and
floodplain in the approximate northern third of the property is flat.
3.3 Watercourses
There is one unnamed watercourse on the property that originates approximately lkm
west of Moon Point Drive. The creek traverses the northern portion of the property,
flowing from west to east and discharges to Lake Simcoe through a smal1 cOlTUgated steel
pipe culvert under the roadway (Figure 3, Photographs 2 and 3). Upstream to the west of
Woodland Drive, the creek traverses active agricultural land with cattle access and
discharges to an online pond immediately adjacent to the roadway (photograph 4).
-
Cooke EIS, Town of Orillia
, ' ,/ Township ofOro-Medonte
;~- On the property, the channel is artificially straightened likely to accommodate historical
agricultural use. Consequently, the channel morphologically lacks diversity however it
does provide moderately diverse aquatic habitat conditions. The creek is approximately
5-6m wide with a wetted depth of approximately 30cm (at the time of the field
investigation). Aquatic plants were present albeit sparse including floating arrowhead
(Sagittaria cuneata) and water lettuce (Ludwigia spp.). The aquatic plants combined with
the contributions of woody and organic debris in the channel would provide habitat for a
variety of aquatic organisms.
The banks of the channel and surrounding topography are low allowing for flooding of
the surrounding forest during small scale storm events. Much of the forest adjacent to the
creek was wet at the time of the field investigation, creating pockets of saturated soils
indicative of a wetland. There are numerous tree stumps in the northerly portion of the
property that appear to have been historically cut. These stumps are located throughout
the wetted areas, that combined with the fallen trees are functioning to retard the rate of
overland flow to the channel. Consequently, the area adjacent to the creek functions to
provide ephemeral wetted conditions likely attributable to this anthropogenic influence.
It is possible that the wetted nature of the floodplain is attributable to near to surface
ground water conditions given that the creek is approximating lake tevel, however such
contributions would not be permanent since the property dries considerably during the
summer months (confirmed through communication with adjacent landowner to the east).
Based on discussions with the LSRCA the creek is not within the up-wash zone ofLa.\:e
Simcoe is not considered flood prone. Therefore, the creek on the property does not
flood in response to fluctuations in water levels in Lake Simcoe (LSRCA, telephone
conversation). The LSRCA does not have flood and fill line mapping for this drainage
area.
3.4 Fisheries
There is no background fisheries information available ITom the LSRCA or MNR for the
unnamed watercourse. The outlet of the system is directly connected to Lake Simcoe
therefore it is assumed that species ITom Lake Simcoe would have access to the property.
Additionally, it is expected that fish would be present in the pond located immediately
upstream the property (on the west side of Woodland Drive) and would have access to
the creek on the property.
The system lacks morphological diversity however the treed vegetation provides good
shading of the watercourse (70%-90% cover). The marginal aquatic and wet-adapted
plant species combined with the woody debris in the channel would provide good habitat
for a variety of fish species. Given the proximity to the lake and low flow characteristics
it is expected that the watercourse may provide seasonal habitat for Northern pike (Esox
4
\
?
J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
1
Cooke EIS, Town of Orillia
Township of Oro-Medonte \
lucius). Other species that may use the channel would include centrarchids (sunfish,
largemouth bass, rock bass, black crappie), catfish, carp, and a variety of minnow species
common to the littoral zone of Lake Simcoe, however no fish were observed during the
field investigation.
Water temperature measured at the pond upstream the property (Figure 3) was 17.90C,
decreasing to IS.30C in the channel midway through the property. Temperatures then
increased to 160C at Moon Point Drive, indicating that the tree cover on the property
provides shading of the watercourse to minimize solar radiation and ameliorate water
temperatures in the creek.
3.5 Vegetation
The southern portion of the property is void of tree cover as a result ofland clearing and
has been fil1ed to elevate the property to the desired grade at Moon Point Drive. The
northern and eastem portions of the property are naturalized, comprised of treed
vegetation.
The cleared area at the south western limits of the property is comprised primarily of
weedy annuals and perennials with some shrub species (including staghorn sumac),
typical of old field succession communities. Such species are typical1y considered
opportunistic colonizers of disturbed areas and are frequently non-native species.
Consequently, there are no vegetation species that are considered to be ecolcgicalJy
significant within this area.
The northerly treed portion of the property is predominantly associated with the perennial
wet areas adj acent to the watercourse. The canopy closure was estimated at 60-80%,
limiting sunlight penetration to the forest floor. Common understory species include
sensitive fern, eastern white cedar, and poison ivy with grasses, sedges and other ferns
comprising the dominant vegetation at the watercourse. A summary of the species
documented on the property are shown on Table 1 below.
Table 1. Vegetation Documented on the Subject Property
Tree Dominant
Layer: Species Eastem white cedar (Thuja occidentalis), sugar maple (Acer
saccharum), silver maple (Acer saccharinum), red maple
(acer rubrum)
Other ironwood (Ostyra virginiana), white birch (Betula
Species papyrifera), trembling aspen (Populus tremulaides), eastern
hemlock (Tsuga canadensis), yel10w birch (Betula
alleghaniensis), American beech (Fagus grandifolia), black
cherry (Prunus seratina), white spruce (Picea glauca),
-
I
I
,,/
-@
/" "
Cooke EIS, Town ofOrillia
Township ofOro-Medonte
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
!
white elm (Ulmus americana), mountain ash (Sorbus
decora), green ash (Fraxinum pennsylvanica), speckled
alder (Alnus incana), chokecherry (Prunus virginiana),
white pine (Pinus strobus)
Shrub Dominant eastern white cedar (Thuja occidentalis), poison ivy
Layer Species (Toxicodendron radicans), ground hemlock (Taxus canadensis)
Other virginia creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia), wild red
Species raspberry (Rubus idaeus), dwarf raspberry (Rubus
pubescens), grape (Vitis spp.), grape woodbine
(Parthenocissus inserta), fly honeysuckle (Lonicera
canadensis), alder-leaved buckthorn (Rhamnus alnifolia),
round leaved dogwood (Comus rugosa)
Herb Species awl- fruited sedge (Carex stipata)
Layer: black snakeroot (Sanicula marilandica)
blue cohosh ((Caulophyllum thalictroides)
common burdock (Arctium minus)
common speedwell (Veronica officinalis)
drooping wood sedge (Carex arctata)
false solomon's seal (Smilacina racemosa)
fueweed (Epilobium angustifolium)
grapevine (Vitis sp.)
herb Robert (Geranium robertianum)
moss (Campyliom stellatum)
orange hawkweed (Hieracium aurantiacum)
ostrich fem (Matteuccia struthiopteris)
red baneberry (Actea rubra)
sarsaparilla (Aralia nudicaulis)
sedge (Carex arctata)
sensitive fern (Onoclea sensibilis)
smooth bedstraw (Galium spp.)
spinulose woodfem (Dryopteris carthusiana)
trillium (Trillium grandifolium)
woodland horsetail (Equisetum sylvaticum)
wonnseed (Erysimum cheiranthoides)
yellowavens (Geum aleppicum)
In accordance with the Ecological Land Classification for Southern Ontario, (1998), the
vegetation associated with the watercourse and ephemeral wet areas is classified as a
White Cedar Mineral Mixed Swamp Ecosite (code SWM 1), characterized by the
presence of cedar, white and yellow birch, with ash, trembling aspen, red maple and elm.
6
Cooke EIS, Town ofOrillia
Township ofOro-Medonte
MNR and LSRCA have no records ofrare, threatened or endangered species associated
with this property (telephone conversations with MNR and LSRCA staff). Our field
reconnaissance did not identifY rare, threatened or endangered species on the property.
The property is not located within the County Greenlands area (Gartner Lee Ltd., 1996),
and is not identified by the MNR as a designated wetland, Area of Natural and Scientific
Interest (ANSI), or Environmentally Significant Area (ESA).
3.6 Wildlife
The property is located adjacent to a fully developed shoreline residential area, and is
bordered to the north of John Moon Road and to the west of Woodland Drive by
developed agricultural lands. Consequently use of the property by wildlife would be
consistent with semi-urban landscapes. Species that may utilize the property include
white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus), red fox (Vulpes Vulpes), groundhog
(Marmota monax) (noted by the adjacent landowner), skunk (Mephitis mephitis) as well
as small mammals such as mice, voles, rabbits, raccoon and skunk. Racoon (Procyon
lotor) tracks were observed on the property at the watercourse.
An active den site, comprised of three entrance holes was found on the topographic slope
between the east proposed lot and the adjacent existing residence. Groundhogs have been
observed in the area by the adjacent landowner however no tracks were observed at the
den site to confinn the species using the site. The size of the entrance holes and their
location within woodland cover suggests that they were likely dug originally by
groundhogs as a winter den site but have been used over the years as by other animals
common to the area like red foxes and striped skunks.
Bird vocalization activity was high at the time of the field investigation. Species
observed at the site include black-capped chickadee (Parus atricapillus), and American
robin (Turdus migratorius). The property is encircled by developed land (both
agricultural and residential).
The downed woody debris, ephemeral pools and understory vegetation within the
floodplain of the channel would provide good habitat for amphibians and reptiles.
No vulnerable, threatened or endangered fauna were observed or documented to occur on
the property.
,,/
/~- 4.0 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
The proposed development includes the creation of three lots for residential use !Tonting
Moon Point Drive, each with a lot !Tontage of 45.72m (150'), and a lot area ofO.61ha
(1.51 acres), (Figure 3). The currently cleared area at the southern portion of the property
includes Lot 1 and part of Lot 2. The footprint for the proposed residences on these lots
will be located within the currently cleared area, and is not proposed beyond the existing
toe of the fill slope. Due to the small scale of the development and large lot size, suitable
servicing of the three lots is by private wells and septic systems.
Cooke EIS, Town of Orillia
Township of Oro-Medonte
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
The back slope !Tom the existing fill within the proposed development area on Lots 1 and
half of Lot 2 to the tree line is approximately 4:1. This slope grade will remain in the
final development plan. Development of the easterly portion of Lot 2 and Lot 3 will
require the removal of vegetation as well as additional grading to achieve the 4:1 back
slope on the building envelope on these two lots.
The proposed development plan does not include the removal of vegetation north of the
existing toe of the fill. The watercourse and associated riparian within the swamp ecosite
will be fully retained in the fmal development plan.
5.0 IMP ACT ASSESSMENT
5.1 Land Use
5.1.1 On-Site Land Use
The on-site land use will be changed to residential with large !Tontages to Moon Point
Drive. This land use is not consistent with the OP for Oro-Medonte therefore an
Amendment to the OP or to the Zoning By-law is required to permit the proposed
development.
Although the watercourse is not contained within the Environmental Protection Two land
use area, it is considered by the Town to be an environmentally significant feature that
requires protection. The OP and the Zoning By-law stipulates "no building or structure
shall be located within 30m ofthe top of bank of any watercourse", (Section 5.33 ofthe
Zoning By-law). The buildings or structures are proposed within the southerly portion of
the lots and will remain outside the SWMl ecosite that includes the riparian zone and
30m setback of the watercourse. Therefore the proposed development conforms to this
development criteria.
The implementation ofthe development plan would be expected to result in an increase
in passive recreational land use within the riparian corridor of the watercourse, although
access to the feature currently exists given the surrounding shoreline residential
8
Cooke EIS, Town of Orillia
Township of Oro-Medonte
development and parkland immediately to the east of the property. Use of this type of
corridor by humans and pets cannot usually be mitigated or avoided, and is not expected
to harmfully alter the onsite land use.
5.].2 Adiacent Land Use
Since the adjacent land use to the south and east of the site is residential shoreline
development, development of the subject property for residential use will not result in
adverse land use impacts to already developed areas. The development area is relatively
small (on]y three lots) therefore there will be negligible increase in traffic volume to the
area.
5.2 Soils and topography
Ha]f of the proposed development area has been historically cleared of vegetation (Lot 1
and half of Lot 2) and is currently stable. The rear of the property slopes to the north at a
slope of approximately 4: 1 and will remain at a 4: 1 in the final development plan. The
existing fill is comprised of clay mixed with some grave] and exhibits smal] gully's
formed ITom surface runoff however these areas are minor and are not resulting in
significant erosion on the property. The 4:1 slope is considered stable indicating that the
fill type and slope are suitable for the development. The LSRCA should be consulted
prior to development to ensure that the 4:1 site grading slopes are acceptable given the
proximity to the northerly watercourse.
The development of the easterly portion of Lot 2, and Lot 3 will require the removal of
trees and the addition of fill to achieve the required grade. The topography towards the
eastern portion of the development area slopes north westerly and includes the building
envelope of Lot 3. Consequently the architectural design for Lots 2 and 3 should
confonn to the landscape, and may require the development of a walkout basement type
residence. The existing residence to the east was constructed atop the hill slope and
required the removal of hardpan clay to construct the concrete footings. The clay
foundation provides a completely stable foundation for the home, and is expected to
similarly provide a stable foundation for the easter]y]ot.
5.3 Watercourse
The proposed lot depth for the three lots is 133m (440') ITom Moon Point Drive northerly
(Figure 3). The south bank ofthe watercourse is located 129m (428') ITom Moon Point
Drive indicating that the lot line is located approximately at the north bank of the creek.
The banks of the creek are very low allowing for the dispersal of flows following small
increases in water levels. The wetted condition is prim2rily attributable to the inability
.
Cooke EIS, Town ofOrillia
, ' / Township ofOro-Medonte
;~- for surface drainage to reach the watercourse as a result of disruption of overland flow
due to fallen woody debris. At the time of the field investigation, wetted conditions in
the swamp ecosite extended approximately 38m ITom the creek bank southerly. The toe
of the existing fill line extends 81m (266') ITom Moon Point Drive, with the remaining
52m located within the treed area (Figure 3). Therefore it is recommended that the
development not intrude into the 38m zone adjacent to the creek, such that based on the
current toe of the embankment, it is recommended that development be permitted
northerly to a maximum of 14m ITom the existing toe of fill.
The retention of the buffer area in its natural state is considered an appropriate setback
ITom the development area to ensure that the identified natural areas are protected. The
LSRCA indicated through telephone discussions that the preservation of a minimum 30m
buffer would be appropriate for this project. Nonetheless, the LSRCA is the ultimate
authority responsible for the designation of flood and fill regulated areas, and should be
consulted prior to project implementation to ensure that the proposed development limits
are in accordance with the provisions of the Conservation Authorities Act.
The development plan includes the placement of structures or buildings within the
southern portion of the property towards Moon Point Drive in order to retain the
northerly natural features on the property. This will minimize the requirement for tree
removal and effectively minimize potential disturbance to the watercourse to satisfy the
Township's criteria for the consideration of new residential plans of subdivision.
Additional fill within the developable area should be graded to no less than a 4:1 back
slope, and the toe of the additional fill should not extend beyond the limits of the existing
toe of slope. Additionally, any proposal to place the building envelope towards the rear
of the proposed development area adjacent to the undisturbed forested should evaluate
plans for a walk out basement or comparable design to accommodate the topography of
the property and minimize the requirement for additional fill placement.
Sedimentation of a watercourse adversely impacts fish habitat conditions and is
prohibited under the Federal Fisheries Act in the absence of the appropriate approval
granting such authority. Therefore, it is strongly recommended that silt controls be
properly installed and maintained throughout the development phase to ensure that fill
does not enter the creek or associated floodplain.
5.4 Fisheries
The proposed conceptual development plan does not involve any watercourse crossings
or alterations to the channel and associated floodplain therefore the proposal is not
expected to adversely impact fish habitat conditions. The plan includes the retention of
the treed buffer to the watercourse to maintain the shading and water temperature
regulating feature on the property, as well as to protect the quality offish habitat. To
. 0
iv
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
Cooke EIS, Town of Orinia
Township ofOro-Medonte
ensure that exposed soils do not migrate to the watercourse during construction, the
development plan should include a sediment and erosion control strategy for onsite soil
management.
-
5.5 Vegetation
The development plan includes the retention ofthe existing treed area in the northerly
third of the property but does require the removal of treed vegetation in the south easterly
portion of Lot 2 and southerly portion of Lot 3 to prepare the building envelope. The
removal of trees to the recommended 38m protection zone is not expected to adversely
impact natural features or ecological functions on the property.
Tree removal will be required to prepare the building envelope on Lots 2 and 3 however
such clearing will not result in the Joss of documented rare, threatened or endangered
species, or wetland vegetation.
5.6 Wildlife
The small size of the development win result in miuima] noise and disturbance impacts to
wildlife resulting from human activity. There will be no Joss of vegetation in the swamp
ecosite and no alteration of the downed woody debris, understory or ephemeral pools.
Therefore it is expected that herpeti]e habitat will not be disturbed as a result of the Jot
development.
The east west movement ofwi]d]ife across the northern boundary of the property and
adjacent lands to the north to John Moon Drive will not be affected as a result of
development.
The development of the easterly portion of Lot 2 and 3 win result in the Joss of a wildlife
den site located on the existing hin slope. The den site is active and is composed of three
entrance holes that appear to be used at times by various species of wildlife (i.e.
groundhog, striped skunk and possibly red fox). An these species utilize multip]e den
sites within their home ranges and tend to vary their use of den sites both within and
between years. Consequently, these dens don't represent the only dens used by wildlife
in the area and Joss of this one den site win not affect the survival or reproduction oflocal
wildlife populations.
6.0 MITIGATION
The fonowing mitigation strategy is recommended to ensure that potential impacts of the
development of the three lots is minimized:
",/
-fA\-
)!y{ .
Cooke EIS, Town ofOrillia
Township of Oro-Medonte
Prevent the migration of erodable soils to the watercourse and associated floodplain
within the swamp ecosite through the use of properly installed and maintained
sediment controls. Sediment and erosion controls should be installed along
Woodland Drive, the northern boundary of the existing toe of the fill slope, and along
the eastern boundary of the development area returning to Woodland Drive to enclose
the area of disturbance. Sediment controls will also function to prevent the accidental
intrusion of machinery equipment into the recommended protected areas;
The boundary of the sediment controls should function to delineate the area of
disturbance, All fill and debris should be contained within the area enclosed by
sediment fencing to prevent the accidental disturbance of natural areas;
Due to the low creek banks, the top of bank is at the creek with the surrounding
riparian and associated swamp extending to the south by approximately 38m. This
area should be avoided and should remain in its natural state requiring that it be
protected during construction. All construction equipment should remain outside the
drip line of trees associated with the top of bank vegetation, and appropriate set-
backs should be confinned in consultation with the LSRCA. Preliminary discussions
with the LSRCA indicate that the retention of a minimum 30m buffer is appropriate
for this project. We recommend a temporary barrier be erected during construction to
protect the area from disturbance during construction;
Fill has been placed on Lot 1 and part of Lot 2, however additional fill is expected to
be required to elevate the development area on Lots 2 and 3. Therefore, extensive use
of silt fencing is required prior to commencing any construction activities to protect
adjacent lands from sedimentation and washout;
The design of the septic systems and wells must comply with the Ontario Building
Code and the Ministry of the Environment regulations and guidelines. We
recommend that the building envelope for the septic and well be placed within the
existing and proposed cleared lands in the southern portion of the property; and,
Slopes on rear lots towards the area recommended for protection should be graded to
the satisfaction of the LSRCA. Slopes of 4:1 (to 5:1) are recommended to minimize
the potential for erodable slopes adjacent to the natural corridor to the creek. The
soils are comprised predominantly of clay therefore the recommended slopes are
considered appropriate to ensure slope protection on the property.
.
.
.
.
.
7.0 CONCLUSIONS
The results of our study indicate that the developable lands on the proposed three lots
should be confined to the southerly portion of the property consistent with the extent of
the existing cleared lands. Development should not encroach on the recommended set
back ITom the watercourse, and there should be no disturbance beyond the recommended
38m from the south creek bank to pennit the maintenance of the watercourse, and
associated swamp. Development within this specified area would not negatively impact
the natural features and functions on the property.
IL
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
Cooke EIS, Town ofOrillia
Township ofOro-Medonte
The development win result in the loss of edge forest cover on the southerly part of Lot 2
and Lot 3, and will impose minima] disturbance to soils and topography. Deve]opment of
these lots will also likely result in the loss of a wildlife den site on the property. The loss
of forest cover loss is not considered significant fTom a biological perspective, and the
loss of the den site is not expected to have an impact on local wildlife populations Since
development of the property is located in previously cleared and fined lands outside the
swamp habitat associated with the watercourse wildlife habitat on the property will
remain relatively unaltered.
\\D\ ~ '3
Deve]opment must have regard for protecting the watercourse and associated swamp
through the diligent application and maintenance of sediment controls.
.
,,/
-@-
/ ' ' 8.0 REFERENCES
Cooke EIS, Town ofOrillia
Township ofOro-Medonte
Brockman, C. F., 1968. Trees of North America, Western Publishing Company, Inc.
Chambers, B.C., K. Legasy, and C.V.Bentley 1996. Forest Plants of Central Ontario,
Lone Pine Publishing.
Chapman, L. J. and Putnam, D. F., 1984. The Physiography of Southem Ontario; Ontario
Geological Survey, Special Volume 2, 27Op.
Gartner Lee Ltd. 1996. Development of a Natural Heritage System for the County of
Simcoe, GLL 94-281.
Lee, H.T., W.D. Bakowsky, J. Riley, J. Bowles, M. Puddister, P. Uhig and S. McMurray.
1998. Ecological Land Classification for Southern Ontario. First Approximation and
its application. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. Southcentral Science Section.
Science Development and Transfer Branch. SCSS Field Guide FG-02.
Newcomb, L., 1977. Newcomb's Wildflower Guide. Little Brown and Company.
Township ofOro-Medonte Official Plan, February, 2001. Consolidated Version with
Modifications & Amendments.
14
-^S3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
!
I
I
SUBJECT PROPERTY
L.etend: .,
~__A ENVJRONMENTAL Ci::JNsuuJNG, INC
,f!JIMU'H
/'
~~ W~ ----~-~--~_.-------------,--------~._------
SITE LOCATION
~-~: ---~~-- Ague No.
:~,~_!:---- -- La,a. COOKE 1
_No ",:;,," .'S
~Name: , Iopo.cd>
LEGEND
li5;-6'oti] Recreational
~;;Sj;;
~ Shoreline
Restricted Rural
OVERLAY DESIGNATIONS
Environmental
Protection Two
AEC Figure 2
-
*='=='m_~_~
Nole: AU the tDke.. rlvcra and creeks tdenUfied on tbls scbed"l~
are subject to I.be policies of SecUon GI and G4 of this Plan.
CITY
OF
ORIWA
--...-....
'6
17
Subject Property
IS
.;
19 t1
::3
~
~
20 ::>
~
II
(DRILL/A>
EIGHT MILE POINT
"'NOTE
COMPONENTS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION ONE AND TWO
DESIGNATIONS ARE SHOWN ON
SCHEDULE B
500 0
h-....J
-
-
-
A
.<
I
IOOOm
I
TOWNSHIP OF
OFFICIAL PLAN
SCHEDULE
1:20,000
FEBRUARY 1097
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
..
-
-
-
-
AGRICUL TURAL
AGRICUl TURAl
FOREST AREA
POND
W
>
-
C>:
~
~ Lot 1
<[
-1
~
o
o
):
8M
2 ot 3
:;RICUl TURAl
Aren of RecoMMended SetbQck
Photos
Toe of Existing Fill
Property
$ll\'IG(
~~b\<~Enh,,\...
\<($1'"
-1
<[
L:lW-
ZZf-
~:;2
f-wW
"'!kEi
-0'"
x:rw
w"'!k
EXISTING
RESIDENTIAL
Dc:te Issued<
Creo:ted .
Pro t: No.
n._
,/
~ ENVIRONMENTN. CoNsuLTING, INC.
/' "
COOKE EIS
....,2004
.....
04-12:4
F .
South of Po.rt Lot 17, FIgure No.
Concession 3, Town of Drill! 3
AEC Project No.
04-124
Environmenta! Assessments 8: Approva!s
Site Location:
Cooke EIS, Concession 3, south part lot 11, Orillia
Photo 1110. Date:
1 June 21, 2004
Description:
Historically cleared area at
the corner of Woodland
Drive and Moon Point
Drive at proposed lots 1-3,
looking north easterly.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Photo No. Date:
2 June 21, 2004
Description:
Unnamed watercourse
along the rear of the
proposed lots, looking
upstream (westeriy).
,,II
WIMUTH ENVIRONMENTAL
,(' INC.
AEC Project No.
04-124
Environmenta! Assessments .& Approva!$
Site Location:
Cooke flS, Concession 3, south part lot 17, Orillia
Photo No. Date:
:3 June 21, 2004
Description:
Downstream reach of the
unnamed watercourse on
the east side of Moon
Point Drive where the
channel outlets to Lake
Simcoe.
Photo No. Date:
4 June 21,2004
Description:
Online pond located at
immediately upstream of
the property on the west
side of Woodland Drive.
\-
.
,1/
-'@ZIMUTH ENVIRONMENTAL
,/ I' CONSULTING, INC.
\~'! -
Environmental Assessments & Approvals
January 12,2005
AEC 04- I 24
Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority
120 Bayview Parkway
Newmarket, Ontario
L3Y 4XI
Attention: Craig Cooper, Environmental Planner
Re: Application for Zoning By-Law & Official Plan Amendment
Lot 7, Concession 3, Township of Oro-Medonte
LSRCA File No. P-159-04 & 2004-0P-04
Dear Mr. Cooper;
Azimuth has reviewed the comments provided by the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation
Authority (LSRCA) to Mr. Lester Cooke, (dated November 22,2004) in response to our
Environmental Impact Study report (dated August, 23, 2004). To assist in finalizing
LSRCA's review of Mr. Cooke's submission, the following information is provided.
The development of Lots 2 and 3 will require clearing of vegetation in the southern
portion of the lot to the existing toe offill on Lot 1 and the western portion of Lot 2. The
area of vegetation that will be removed is approximately 0.4 hectares.
The vegetation community in the O.4ha parcel is comprised of predominantly deciduous
tree species within a vegetative community designated as a Dry-Fresh Sugar Maple
Deciduous Forest Ecosite (FOD5), (Ecological Lands Classifications for Southern
Ontario (ELC), 1998). This community is characterized by sugar maple, silver maple,
ironwood, white birch, beech, and black cherry, located on upper or middle slopes with
suitable drainage features.
As requested by LSRCA, the species of vegetation documented to occur on the property
was evaluated in conjunction with the Distribution and Status of Vascular Plants of
Central Region (Riley, 1989). Mountain ash (Sorbus decora) was observed on the
229 Mapleview Drive East, Unit 1, Barrie, Ontario L4N OW5
telephone: (705) 721-8451; fax: (705) 721-8926 info@azimuthenvironmental.com
----'~~~"----~
----~.~--------
"
, >
,,/
-@-
/, '
! G\ - 4:
property and is a species categorized by Riley (1989) as a rare (R-5) native plant in
Simcoe County. Soper and Heimburger (1994, Shrubs of Ontario, Royal Ontario
Museum, Toronto, ON) indicate that Sorbus decora is common on the Bruce Peninsula
and Manitoulin Island and Lake Huron to the north shore of Lake Superior, but less
abundant south of the Canadian Shield and rare south of 450 N. The Natural Heritage
Information Centre (2004) however indicates that Sorbus decora is globally common, to
very common (GRANK G4, G5, rank dated September, 1984), and provincially is also
very common, and demonstrably secure in Ontario (SRANK, S5, rank dated March 31,
2000, Ontario General Status is SECURE). Soper and Heimburger (1994) indicate that
Sorbus decora is very similar in appearance to the non-native European mountain-ash
(Sorbus aucuparia) that has been widely planted in Ontario and occurs as a component of
natural plant communities having been dispersed as seed by birds. Therefore, the
possibility exists that the identified Sorbus decora is in fact its European relative.
Although the species has been noted as regionally rare, the R-5 designation indicates that
this species has been documented at 5 stations. In Riley's approach to assigning regional
rarity, documented presence at 5 or fewer sampling locations is often used as a cutoff
point. Therefore, Sorb us decora is at the highest end of the rare classification scale. An
additional occurrence in of this species in Riley's database for Simcoe County may have
lead to it being designated "not rare".
There were no other species recorded to occur on the property that are designated using
the 'Riley' classification system.
We trust that the information provided will be sufficient to address your request for
additional information. Should you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact
me.
Yours truly,
AZIMUTH ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING INC.
/'
".. (
c.:-., \ \
_~c. '.
~-\'
l
.~ \ '_V\
Sara Murphy, B.Sc.,
Aquatic Biologist
SMM:
c.c. Lester Cooke
2
JAN. 28. 2005 4:35PM
LSRCA
NO.9 0 6
p
I
T<k 905-895.1281 Sent by Facsimile 1-705-487-0133
1-800.465-0-137
Fa>" 90s..853.5881
E.M,ij, ;nl\)lffil"o..on.o. January 28,2005
VV'ch: 'W\"wJ~~c~.on.ca.
120 BaY'-iC'U' Parn"2.Y
Box 282
N cwmarket, Ontario
WY 4X1
A
Watershed
for Life
File No.: P-159-04 & 2004-0P-04
IMS File No.:PZOC376C2 & POFC198
Ms. Andrea Leigh, Senior Platmer
Township ofOro-Medonte
P.O. Box 100
Oro, ON LOL 2XO
Dear Ms. Leigh:
Re: Application For Zoning By-Law & Official Plan Amendment
Lot 7, Concession 3
Township of Oro-l\1edonte
(Lester Cooke)
Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority (LSRCA) staff have reviewed submission dated
January 12, 2005 prepared by Azimutl1 Environmental Consulting Inc., in regard to the above
noted file and advise we have no objection to the approval of this application. We provide the
following additional information:
The EIS by Azimuth Environmental recommends that there be a 38 Metre buffer adjacent to the
watercourse. LSRCA staff recommend that the buffer area be zoned open space or environmental
protection to reshict further development within this aJ'ea.
I trust this meets your requirements at this time, In order to facilitate our processing of this file,
please reference the above noted file numbers in future conespondence.
If you have any questions, please contact the tll1dersigned at 905-895-1281, ex!. 288.
Yours truly,
~~~~
Craig Cooper
Environmental Planner
CC/ph
c.
Lester Cooke, OV!J1er, By Mail
Sara Murphy, Azimuth Environmental Consulting Inc., 1-705-721-8926 - Fax
S:\Cn.igC'Zone~B)'1...\4'\OTO Medontt:',Q 1-24-05~Cooke-ORO-20N&O'P .wpd
SC PLANNING/fORESTRY
705 727 4276
01/11 '05 16:18 NO.614 01/0<
NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING
FOR PROPOSE)) AMENDMENTS
'.
'{~lED)
TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN AN!) ZONING BY.LAW
c .:~; Z 3 200'1
OFTHETOWNSIllPOFORO-MEIJONTE c.':)' ;YC,O -".Me
P-J59/0 -' ~ "'A,!:.
,e,;jiN:;r;-/'H: :':rl i'hCfS [)2PA'!Tt,IENT
TAKE NOTICE that the Council of the CorpOr3tiOD of the TO'Wl1ship of Oro-Medome wil1 hold::t Public Meeting on
Monday, J.anuary: 17;2005- at 7:15 p.m. in the Municipal Council Chambers. The purpose ofrhe public meeting;s
to obtaln pubJic comments on proposed amendments to the Zoning By-law 31)d Official Plan. under Section 34 of the
PI:>rming Ac~ R.S.O. 1990 c. P. 13,
THE PROPOSED Official Plan Amendment would redesignate the JaIJds described as Concession 3. South Part of
Lot 17 (formerly within the Township of GriJlia). The subject lan&:; are proposed to be redesignated from the
Restricted Rural Designation to a Shoreline Designation. The purpo!'e of {he amendment would be to allow for the
creation of three new resideotiallots.
- --.-.'
mE PROPOSED Zoning By-law Amendment would rezone the lands described as Concession 3, South Pan of lot
17 (fOrInCfly within the Township of Orillia). T'he subject Jands are proposed to be rez.oned from the
AgriculturaJlRural (AlRU) Zone to the Shoreline Residential (SR) Zone.
A KEY MAP for File P-159/03 is provided below.
A..~ PERSON may attend the public meeting and/or make written or verbal representation either in support of or in
opposition to the proposed Amendments. If a person QI' public body that files an appeal of a decision of the Township
of Oro~M~donle in rc.<;pect of the proposed Am~ndmcJ1t<; does not make oral sub1russion at the public meeting Or make
written submissions to the Township before the propotsed Amendment~ are adopted. the Ontario Municipal Board may
dismiss all or pan of the appeal.
If you wish to be notified of the docision of the Township of Oro-Medome in respect to tbe proposed Official Plan &
Zoning By-law Amendments, you must make a written request to the address below.
WRJ"ITEN SUBMISSIONS should be diJ:cctcd to:
CD!:myp!S.iJn~()e Planning Di~itjl)n
A<1nji(1dr~\i')n (;~!1n~
1110 11iQI1way ZG
Mdll\'If~.!. QN UK 1X0
NO COMMENT
TI\,S apPIi',JlilJ!1 I~ gU~i~r;1 to ,11! ~ppriJ'i~d
PrO'I\nc;"!. Co"rd'l. ~1'd Lar.al M'~n,,;ip~i
pl.'!rm'na n~(;lilM!\I,. pnllcl~S (1M O'II~""$,
D~I~~L,l4.r. N.11'1~.-C~
Qr<":'\."nl"""'(M)'.....,,'"t"'~:,""t'i{~.""-1
Township of Oro-Mcdoote
148 Line 7 South
P,O. Box J()(J. Oro. Ontario LOt 2XO
Attn: Maril}11 Pcrmycook, Clerk
ADOmONAL INFORMATION re13ting to the propcsed Amendments is available for j]Jspecri~n be~etn 8;-0
a.m. and 4:30 p,m. at the TO'NI1ship of Oro-Medonte Administration Building. For further information, contact the
Planning Department., 705-487-2171.
DATE)) at the T oWtlship of Oro-MeiJoore mis 2J' day of December 2004.
~;;ruo~T'
t
---
~.....~-
100 0 100-'"
~
\~\ -y~
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE\
BY-LAW NO. 2005-030
\, '\
A By-law to Authorize the Transfer and Exchange of Lands Between
The Township of Oro-Medonte and Richard and Janet Hennig
Part Lot 5, Cone. 4 [P.I.N. 74055-0008 (Lt)] and Part of the Original Road Allowance
between Lots 5 and 6, Cone. 4 [P.I.N. 74055-0002 (U)]
(Ora), Township of Oro-Medonte
WHEREAS pursuant to Section 11 (2) of the Municipal Act, S.O. 2001, c.25, as amended,
Council is empowered to pass by.laws respecting highways;
AND WHEREAS Section 66 of the Municipal Act, S.O. 2001, c.25, as amended, empowers
municipalities if, before January 1, 2003, a highway was opened on land in the place of all
or part of an original road allowance and compensation was not paid for the land, to
exchange lands with the owner of the land appropriated for the highway or the successor in
title to the owner;
AND WHEREAS Council has, by resolution, declared Part of the Original Allowance
Between Lots 5 and 6, Concession 4, (Ora), Township of Oro.Medonte, Part 2, Plan 51 R-
25502 not to be required for municipal purposes;
NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Township of Ora.Medonte hereby enacts as follows;
1. That the Township enter into a land transfer and exchange as described in Schedule
'A' attached herelo and forming part of this by-law;
2. THAT this By-law shall come into force and take effect on its final passing thereof.
BY-LAW READ A FIRST AND SECOND TIME THIS 6TH DAY OF APRIL, 2005.
BY-LAW READ A THIRD TIME AND FINALLY PASSED THIS
DAY OF
,2005.
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
Mayor, J. Nell Craig
Clerk, Marilyn Pennycook
Lands to be
Conveyed
Part of Lot 5, Cone 4
(PIN #74055.0008)
Part 3, 51R.25502
Schedule "A"
to By-law No. 2005-030 for
The Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte
Part of Original Road Allowance
Between Lots 5 and 6, Cone 4
Part 2, 51R.25502
From
Richard and Janet Hennig
Township of Oro-Medonte
Part I, 51R.25502
To
Township of Oro-Medonte
Richard and Janet Hennig
k
,
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
BY-LAW NO. 2005-31
BEING A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF A
TEMPORARY USE BY-LAW AGREEMENT (GARDEN SUITE)
BETWEEN THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE AND
MONTGOMERY AND TRACEY CHILDS AND ELSIE GILCHRIST
WEST HALF OF LOT 2, CONCESSION 8,
(FORMERLY TOWNSHIP OF ORO),
TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE, COUNTY OF SIMCOE
WHEREAS Section 39(1.2) of The Planning Act, R.S.O 1990 c.P. 13, as amended
provides for the entering into of an agreement to authorize the temporary use of a garden
suite;
AND WHEREAS Council deems if necessary to enter into an agreement on the lands
described herein;
AND WHEREAS Council for the Corporation of the Township of Oro.Medonte established
Temporary Use By.law policies in the Official Plan for the Township; .
NOW THEREFORE the Council for the Corporation of the Township of Oro.Medonte
hereby enacts as follows;
1. That the Township enter into the Temporary Use By-law Agreement attached hereto
as Appendix 'A' on lands described on the attached Schedule 'A' to the Agreement;
2. That the attached Appendix "A" and Schedule 'A' to the Agreement form part of this
By.law;
3. That the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized to execute the Temporary Use By.law
Agreement on behalf of the Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte;
4. That this By.law shall come into force and take effect upon being enacted by Council.
BY-LAW READ A FIRST AND SECOND TIME THIS 6th DAY OF APRIL, 2005.
BY-LAW READ A THIRD TIME AND FINALLY PASSED THIS DAY OF
2005.
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
Mayor - J. Neil Craig
Clerk - Marilyn pennycook
.
\It
Appendix "A" to
By-Law No. 2005-031
THIS AGREEMENT made the ]6th day of _March, 2005
BETWEEN: MONTGOMERY AND TRACEY
CHILDS
hereinafter called the "Owner"
OF THE FIRST PART
AND
ELSIE GILCHRIST
hereinafter caJled the "Occupant"
OF THE SECOND PART
AND
THE CORPORATION OF THE
TOWNSlDP OF ORO-
MEDONTE
hereinafter caJled the
"Municipality"
OF THE THIRD PART
WHEREAS the Council of the Municipality has received an App]ication to temporarily
re-zone a parcd of/and as more particularly described in Schedule" All attached hereto
(the .Subject Lands"), pursuant to Sections 34 and 39 of the Planning Act, R S.O, ]990,
as amended, to authorize the Temporary use of a Garden Suite;
AND WHEREAS pursuant to subsection 39 (1.2) of the Planning Act, the Council of the
Municipality may require the owner of the Garden Suite, or any other person to enter into
an Agreement with the Municipality under. Section 207.2 of the Municipal Act;
AND WHEREAS the lands are being purchased by the owner and the owner and the
occupant have consented to enter into this Agreement with the municipality under the
tenns and conditions hereinafter set forth, as a condition of the transfer of the rights and
obligations of the temporary use by-law;
AND WHEREAS the owner and the occupant have consented to enter into an
Agreement with the municipality under the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, as a
condition of the temporary re-zoning to authorize the use of a Garden Suite upon the
Subject Lands;
NOW THEREFORE consideration of the temporary re-zoning of the subject lands, the
Owner and the Occupant hereby covenant and agree with the Municipality y.Jif"'-.'-H /JJ.
RECEIVED
C:\Documents and SettillQs\montv\DesldoP\Childs GanJen Suite AQreement (3).doc
MAR 1 7 1005
ORO-MEOONTE
TOWNSHIP
.
2
I. DEFINITIONS
I. I "Garden Suite" means a one unit detached residential structure containing
bathroom and kitchen facilities that is ancillary to an existing residenrilil
structure and that is designed to be portable.
1.2 "Pennitted Temporary Use" means one modular home, used as a Garden
Suite, in accordance with the terms of this Agreement and the provisions of
the Temporary Use By-law.
1.3 "Temporary Use By-law" means the by-law passed by the Municipality
pursuant to Sections 34 and 39 of the Planning Act to authorize the
pennitted temporary use upon the subject lands.
2. USE. INSTALLA nON. MAINTENANCE AND REMOVAL OF GARDEN
SUITE
2. I The Owner and Occupant shall be responsible, at their sole cost for the
installation and maintenance ofthe Garden Suite upon the subject Lands in
accordance with the by-laws of the Township in effect from time to time,
Including but not limited to the Temporary Use By-law, and all applicable
Federal and Provincial legislation.
2.2 Subject to the terms of this Agreement and the Temporary Use By-law, the
pennitted temporary use may be carried on upon the Subject Lands from the
date of the commencement of the Term of this Agreement, as hereinafter
defined.
2.3 The Owner and Occupant shall remove the Garden Suite from the subject
lands on or before tbe earlier of
(a) in the event of default by the Owner or Occupant under -the terms of
this Agreement or the provisions of the Temporary Use By-law, the
30th day following written notice from the Township of the
tennination of this Agreement;
(b) the last day of the Term of this Agreement.
2.4 In the event that the Owner and occupant fail to remove the Garden Suite
from the Subject hands in accordance with the provisions of this
Agreement, the Municipality may enter upon the Subject Lands to remove
tlw .Garden Suite, and all costs incurred by the Municipality in connection
therewith shall be recoverable from the Owner pursuant to the provisions
3
of Section 326 of the Municipal Act, c.M. 45, R.S.O. 1990, as amended,
whereby the costs incurred will be added to the tax roll and collected ih a
like manner as taxes.
3. TERM
3.1 The Term of this Agreement shall commence rrom the date of executiotl by the
Township and expiring on the day immediately proceeding the 3rd day of May,
2010.
4. OCCUPANCY OF GARDEN SUITE
4.1 The Owner and Occupant shall not permit the Garden Suite to be occupied
by any person other than the Occupant.
5. DEFAULT AND TERMINATION
5.1 In the event of default by the Owner or the Occupant under the terms of
this Agreement, which default shall not have been cured by the Owner or
Occupant within 30 days of written notice of default from the Municipality,
the Municipality shall have the right to terminate this Agreement on 30
days notice in writing to the owner and Occupant.
5.2 In the event of termination ofthis Agreement, the rights of the Owner and
Occupant to continue the permitted temporary use shalI immediately cease,
and the Municipality shall be entitled to repeal the Temporary Use By-law
without further notice to the Owner or Occupant.
6. EXPENSES OF THE MUNICIPALITY
6.1 Every provision of this Agreement by which the owner or occupant is
obligated in any way shall be deemed to include the words "at the expense of
tne Owner or Occnpaul' as the case may De, nmess tne comext OUlefWf5e
requITes.
6.2 The Owner and Occupant shall be responsible for and shall pay to the
Municipality on demand all costs incurred by the Municipality in connection
with the preparation and enforcement of this Agreement and the Temporary
Use By-law.
6.3 The Owner and Occupant shall, on or before the execution of this
Agreement by the municipality, file with the Municipality a deposit in the
amount of $2500. 00, which may be applied by the Municipality in reduction
of the costs incurred as set out above.
4
6.4 AU costs and expenses exceeding the said $ 2500.00 deposit shall be
recoverable trom the owner as described in Section 2.4.
7. NOTICE
AlJ Notices to be given hereunder may be given by registered letter addressed to:
Owner: Montgomery and Tracey Childs
3193 Line 7 North
R. R. #2
Oro Station,ON LOL 2EO
Occupant: /Elsie Gilchrist
3193 Line 7 North
R. R. #2
Oro Station,ON LOL 2EO
Municipality: Township of Oro-Medonte
148 Line 7 South
P.O. Box 100
Oro,ON LOL 2XO
or such other address as the parties may respectively trom time to time designate in
writing, and any such Notice shall be deemed to have been given to and received
by the addressee three (3) days after the mailing thereof; postage prepaid and
registered.
8. SEVERABILI1Y
8.1 Any provision of this Agreement which is found to be invalid or
unenforceable under the laws of the Province of Ontario by a court of
competent jurisdiction, to the extent such provision is invalid or
unenforceable, shall be deemed severable and shall not affect any other
provision of this Agreement.
9. NO ASSIGNMENT
5
\\...Q~-
9. I This Agreement, and the rights and obligations arising under it, may not be
assigned by the owner or the Occupant without the prior written consent of
the MunicipaJity.
10. ESTOPPEL
10. I The Owner. Occupant and the Municipality will not call into question
directly or indirectly in any proceeding in law or in equity or before any
administration or other tribunaJ, the right of the other parties to enter in
this Agreement and to enforce every term, covenant and condition of it.
The law of contract applies to this Agreement and the parties are entitled
to all remedies arising from it. This provision may be pleaded by the
parties in any action or proceeding as an estoppel of any deniaJ of such
right.
II. INDEMNIFICA TION FROM LIABll.ITY AND RELEASE
I I. I The owner and Occupant covenant and agree with the municipaJity, on
behaJf of themselves, their pennitted successors and assigns, to indemnity
and save hannless the MunicipaJity, its servants and agents from and
against any and aJl actions, suits, claims and demands whatsoever which
may arise either directly or indirectly in connection with this Agreement.
I 1.2 The Owner and Occupant further covenant and agree to release and
forever discharge the MunicipaJity from and against aJI claims, demands,
causes of actions, of every nature and type whatsoever that may arise as a
resuh of any action taken by the municipality under the terms of this
Agreement
12. INTERPRETA nON
12.1 In the interpretation of this Agreement, unless the context indicates a
contrary intention:
(a) the obligations of more than one party will be joint and severaJ,
(b) words denoting the singular include the pluraJ and vice versa and
words denoting any gender include aJI genders;
(c) headings are for convenience only and do not affect interpretation;
(d) reference to Sections and Schedules are to sections and schedules of
this Agreement and the Schedules fonn part of this Agreement, and
6
(e) this Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each
of which will be deemed an original but which together will
constitute one instrument.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have hereunder set their hands and seals.
SIGNED, SEALED AND DELIVERED
in the presence of
'k- ~
" ......
Tracey Childs, Owner
i!!ft7{fZ,~
Montgomery hilds - P~er of Attorney
for Elsie Gilchrist, Occupant
TIIE CORPORATION OF TIIE
TOWNSIDP OF ORO-MEDONTE
Per:
Neil Craig, Mayor
Marilyn Pennycooke, Clerk
.#
7
-
THIS IS SCHEDULE" A" TO THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN MONTGOMERY AND
TRACY CHll.DS AND THE CORPORATION
OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE.
DESCRIPTION
Concession 8, West Half of Lot 2, Township of Oro-Medonte (formerly Township of
Oro), County of Simcoe
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
BY-LAW NO. 2005-032
A By-law to permanently close and sell Part of
the Original Road Allowance between Lots 21 and 20, Concession 6
(geographic Township of Oro), Part of PIN #58550-0168(Lt), Township of Oro-
Medonte, more particularly described as Part 2, 51 R-30525 and Part 4, 51 R-33477,
Township of Oro-Medonte, County of Simcoe.
WHEREAS pursuant to Section 11 (2) ot the Municipal Act, S.O. 2001, c.25, as
amended, Council is empowered to pass by.laws respecting highways;
AND WHEREAS Section 34 of the Municipal Act, S.O. 2001, c.25, as amended,
empowers municipalities to permanently close a highway after giving notice to the
public;
AND WHEREAS Part of the original road allowance between Lots 21 and 20,
Concession 6, (geographic Township of Oro), Part of PIN #58550-0168(Lt), Township of
Oro-Medonte, more particularly described as Part 2, 51 R.30525 and Part 4,51 R.33477,
Township of Oro-Medonte, County of Simcoe, is no longer required for municipal
purposes;
AND WHEREAS Section 268 of the Municipal Act, S.O. 2001, c.25, as amended,
authorizes a Council of a municipality to dispose of surplus land in accordance with the
provisions of a by.law passed by the Council, establishing procedures governing the
sale of such land;
AND WHEREAS Council did pass By.law No. 2003-125 on the 261h day of November,
2003, being a By-law to govern the procedure for the sale of land within the Township of
Oro-Medonte, pursuant to Section 268 of the Municipal Act, S.O. 2001, c.25, as
amended;
AND WHEREAS Council has previously caused notice to be given of its intention to
permanently close and sell the land described in Schedule "A" attached hereto, in
accordance with the requirements of Section 268 of the Municipal Act, and the
requirements set out in By.law 2003.125, as amended;
AND WHEREAS Council has determined that the said land is not required for municipal
purposes, and has by resolution declared part of the original road allowance between
Lots 21 and 20, Concession 6, (geographic Township of Oro), Part of PIN #58550-
0168(Lt), Township of Oro.Medonte, more particularly described as Part 2, 51 R-30525
and Part 4,51 R-33477, Township of Oro.Medonte, County of Simcoe, to be surplus to
the needs of the municipality;
AND WHEREAS Council has received no notice of objection to the proposed road
closure and sale of land from any party;
AND WHEREAS pursuant to Sections 34 and 268 of the Municipal Act, S.O. 2001,
c.25, as amended, the Clerk of the Township of Oro-Medonte did cause a Notice of the
proposed By-law to permanently close and sell part of the original road allowance
between Lots 21 and 20, Concession 6, (geographic Township of Oro), Part of PIN
#58550-0168(Lt), Township of Oro-Medonte, more particularly described as Part 2,
51 R-30525 and Part 4,51 R.33477, Township of Oro.Medonte, County of Simcoe, to be
published in newspapers of local circulation, a copy of which is attached as Schedule
"c" to this by-law;
AND WHEREAS the proposed By-law came before Council of The Corporation of the
Township of Oro-Medonte for consideration at its meeting on the 61h day of April, 2005,
and at that time no person objected to the proposed By.law nor claimed that his/her
land would be prejudicially affected.
I
\
,
NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Township of Oro.Medonte hereby enacts as
follows:
1. Permanentlv Ciose - Council does hereby permanently close part of the original
road allowance between Lots 21 and 20, Concession 6, (geographic Township of
Oro), Part of PIN #58550.0168(Lt), Township of Oro-Medonte, more particularly
described as Part 2, 51 R.30525 and Part 4,51 R-33477, Township of Oro.
Medonte, County of Simcoe, as described in Schedule "A" attached hereto, and
forming part of this By-law.
2. Authorization of Sale (Transfer) - Council does hereby authorize the sale of part
of the original road allowance between Lots 21 and 20, Concession 6,
(geographic Township of Oro), Part of PIN #58550-0168(Lt), Township of Oro-
Medonte, more particularly described as Part 2,51 R.30525 and Part 4,51 R-
33477, Township of Oro.Medonte, County of Simcoe, to the registered owner
from time to time of the lands described as Part 1,51 R.30525, PIN #58550.
0169(Lt).
3. Sale Price -In accordance with By.law 2003.125, as amended, Council hereby
sets the sale price for part of the original road allowance between Lots 21 and
20, Concession 6, (geographic Township 01 Oro), PIN #58550-0168(Lt),
Township of Oro.Medonte, more particularly described as Part 2, 51R-30525 and
Part 4,51 R.33477, described in Schedule "A" attached hereto, at a consideration
of nil.
4. Execution of Documents - The Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized to sign all
documents to carry out the intent of this By-law.
5. Certificate of Compliance - Schedule "B" attached hereto and forming part of this
By-law is a Certificate of Compliance of Marilyn Pennycook, Clerk of The
Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte, setting out the procedures taken
for the publishing of the said Notice pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal
Act.
BY-LAW READ A FIRST AND SECOND TIME THIS 6TH DAY OF APRIL, 2005.
BY-LAW READ A THIRD TIME AND FINALLY PASSED THIS DAY OF
2005.
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
Mayor, J. Neil Craig
Clerk, Marilyn Pennycook
Schedule "A"
\
to By-law No. 2005-032 for
The Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte
Part of the original road allowance between Lots 21 and 20, Concession 6, (geographic
Township of Ora), PIN #58550.0168(Lt), Township of Oro-Medonte, more particularly
described as Part 2, 51 R-30525 and Part 4, 51 R.33477, Township of Oro.Medonte,
County of Simcoe.
Schedule "B"
to By-law 2005-032
for The Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
IN THE MATTER of the sale of land designated as Part of
the Original Road Allowance between Lots 21 and 20,
Concession 6, (geographic Township of Orc), Part of
PIN #58550-0168(Lt), Township of Oro-Medonte, more
particularly described as Part 2, 51 R-30525 and Part 4,
51 R-33477, Township of Oro-Medonte, County of
Simcoe.
I, Marilyn Pennycook, Clerk of the Township of Oro-Medonte in the County of Simcoe,
certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that:
1 . The Corporation of the Township of Ora.Medonte enacted By-law No. 2003-125
on the 26th day of November, 2003, being a By-law to govern the procedure for
the sale of land within the Township of Oro-Medonte, pursuant to Section 268 of
the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c.25, as amended.
2. By.law No. 2003.125 was in effect at the time the Corporation of the Township of
Ora-Medonte passed the resolution declaring as surplus to the needs of the
municipality, the lands described as:
The Original Road Allowance between Lots 21 and 20, Concession 6,
(geographic Township of Oro), Part of PIN #58550-0168(Lt), Township
of Oro-Medonte, more particularly described as Part 2, 51 R-30525
and Part 4, 51 R-33477, Township of Oro-Medonte, County of Simcoe,
3. Section 268(8) of the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, as amended, authorized
the exclusion of this land from appraisal.
4. A Notice of the proposal by The Corporation of the Township of Ora.Medonte to
pass a By.law to sell land designated as Part of O'Connell Lane, (geographic
Township of Oro), Township of Oro.Medonte, more particularly described as the
original raad allowance between Lots 21 and 20, Concession 6, (geographic
Township of Oro), Part of PIN #58550.0168(Lt), Township of Oro-Medonte, more
particularly described as Part 2, 51 R.30525 and Part 4, 51 R-33477, Township of
Ora.Medonte, County of Simcoe, described in the said Notice was published in
the Barrie Examiner and the Orillia Packet and Times on April 1 , 2005 and the
Midland Free Press on April 5, 2005.
5. The By-law for the sale of the subject lands came before the Municipal Council at
its regular meeting on the 6th day of April, 2005, and at that time, no person or
persons made any claim that his land would be preiudicially affected by the By.
law.
Dated at the Township
of Oro.Medonte, in the County of
Simcoe, this day of 2005.
Marilyn pennycook, Clerk
Township of Oro.Medonte
,
Schedule "C" \
to By-law 2005-032
for The Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHJP OF ORO-MEDONTE
NOTJCE OF PROPOSED ROAD CLOSING AND SALE BY-LA W
TAKE NOTICE that The Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte proposes to
pass a By-law 10 permanemly close and sell a pOI1ion of road in the Township of Oro-
Medome, Coumy of Simcoe, more particularly described in Schedule "A" hereto.
AND FURTHER TAKE NOTICE that the proposed By-law will come before the
Council of The Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medome at its regular meeting to be
held at the Council Chambers on the 6'h day of April, 200S at 7:00 o'clock p.m. and at
that time Council wm hear in person or by his counsel, solicilOr or agent, any person who
claims that his land wm be prejudiciaHy affected by the By-law. Persons wishing 10
appear before Council are to notify the Clerk prior 10 Apri! S' 200S. Comments may also
be submitted, in writing, 10 the Clerk prior to April S, 200S.
DATED AT THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO.MEDONTE THIS 29'h DAY OF MARCH
200S.
Marilyn Pennycook, Clerk
SCHEDULE "A"
Part of the original road aHowance between Lots 20 and 21, Concession 6 (geographic
Township of Oro), Township of Oro-Medonte, more particularly described as Part 2,
SlR-30S25 and Part 4, SlR-33477, Township ofOro-Medonte, County of Simcoe.
\l
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
BY-LAW NO. 2005-022
BEING A BY-LAW TO CONFIRM THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE
COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON WEDNESDAY, APRIL 6, 2005
THE COUNCil OF THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO.MEDONTE
HEREBY ENACTS AS FOllOWS:
1. THAT the action of the Council at its Council Meeting held on Wednesday,
April 6, 2005, and in respect to each Motion, Resolution and other actions passed
and taken by the Council at its said Meeting is, except where prior approval of the
Ontario Municipal Board is required, hereby adopted, ratified and confirmed.
2. THAT the Mayor and the proper Officials of the Township are hereby authorized and
directed to do all things necessary to give effect to the said action or to obtain
approvals where required and to execute all documents as may be necessary on
behalf of the Council of the Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte. And, the
Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to affix the corporate seal to all said
documents.
BY-LAW READ A FIRST AND SECOND TIME THIS 6th DAY OF APRIL, 2005.
BY-LAW READ A THIRD TIME AND FINALLY PASSED THIS 6th DAY OF APRIL,
2005.
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE
Mayor, J. Neil Craig
Clerk, Marilyn Pennycook