The URL can be used to link to this page

03 23 2005 COW Agenda TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING AGENDA COUNCIL CHAMBERS DATE: WEDNESDAY, MARCH 23, 2005 TIME: 9:00 a.m. 1. NOTICE OF ADDITIONS TO AGENDA 2. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA 3. DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST AND THE GENERAL NATURE THEREOF: - "IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ACT" 4. DEPUTATIONS: a) 9:00 a.m. Provincial Constable Janet Small, Community Services & Media Relations Officer, Barrie OPP, re: Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design. b) 9:30 a.m. Jim Woodford, re: Full-Time Legal Counsel. c) 9:40 a.m. John Newell, re: Lakefront Property. 5. CORRESPONDENCE: a) Tiina Nautras, Contracts & Collections Supervisor, The Corporation of the County of Simcoe, correspondence dated February 23, 2005 re: Waste/Recycling Collection within the Township of Oro-Medonte. b) John and Barbara Page, correspondence dated February 14, 2005 re: 24 Myrtle Avenue, Plan 626, Lots 72 and 73, Roll # 4346-010-011-01700-0000. c) John Brown, Mayor, Township of Springwater, correspondence dated March 4, 2005 re: Mayor's Annual Log-Sawing Contest - Elmvale Maple Syrup Festival, April 23, 2005. d) Judy Kern, Managing Director, Oro-Medonte Chamber of Commerce, correspondence dated March 17, 2005 re: Annual Business Achievement Awards Presentation and Dinner, April 4, 2005, The Heights of Horseshoe. e) Bev Hendry, Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, Press Releases dated March 10,2005 re: Province Helps Simcoe County Plan for the Future and Intergovernmental Action Plan for Simcoe, Barrie and Orillia. f) Ann Budge, correspondence dated March 8, 2005 re: Commercial Signage. g) Nicole Matthews, correspondence received March 11, 2005 re: Mount SI. Louis Road East; and Petition dated February 16, 2005 re: Mount SI. Louis Road. 6. FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND FIRE: a) Report No. FD 2005-06, Joe Casey, Director of Fire and Emergency Services, re: Fire Report for Month of January, 2005. b) Report No. FD 2005-07, Joe Casey, Director of Fire and Emergency Services, re: Back- Up Emergency Generator for the Township of Oro-Medonte Administration Building (EMO). c) Report No. TR 2005-08, Paul Gravelle, Treasurer, re: Treasurer's Statement of Remuneration. d) Report No. ADM 2005-009, Marilyn Pennycook, Clerk, re: Proposed Land Transfer and Exchange with Richard and Janet Hennig, Part Lot 5, Conc. 4 [P.I.N. 74055-0008 (Lt)] and Part of the Original Road Allowance between Lots 5 and 6, Conc. 4 [P.I.N. 74055- 0002 (Lt)]. e) Report No. ADM 2005-019, Marilyn Pennycook, Clerk, re: Draft Fees and Charges By- Law. f) Chris Carter, Manager of Recreation and Community Services, re: Requests to Waive Rental Fees, Oro Minor Hockey Association. g) Mayor J. Neil Craig, re: The Ontario Volunteer Service Awards (under separate cover). h) Deputy Mayor Hughes, re: Job Descriptions (from March 9, 2005 meeting). 7. PUBLIC WORKS: None. 8. ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES: a) Keith Mathieson, Director of Engineering and Environmental Services, re: Annual Compliance Reports - Water Supply and Treatment - 2004. Report No. EES 2005-05, Canterbury Report No. EES 2005-06, Cedarbrook Report No. EES 2005-07, Craighurst Report No. EES 2005-08, Harbourwood Report No. EES 2005-09, Horseshoe Highlands Report No. EES 2005-10, Lake Simcoe Regional Airport Report No. EES 2005-11, Maplewood Report No. EES 2005-12, Medonte Hills Report No. EES 2005-14, Shanty Bay Report No. EES 2005-15, Sugarbush 2 b) Report No. 2005-17, Keith Mathieson, Director of Engineering and Environmental Services, re: 1045942 Ontario Inc. (Ken Hewitt) - Site Plan Agreement - Part of the West Y2 and SE ~ of Lot 1, Concession 14, Being Parts 1, 2 and 3, 51 R-6268 - Being all of PIN # 58530-0316 (Lt), Township of Oro-Medonte. 9. BUILDING, PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT: a) Committee of Adjustment, minutes of March 10, 2005 meeting. b) Report No. PD 2005-006, Andy Karaiskakis, Junior Planner, re: Zoning By-Law Amendment for Dale Plant, Concession 9, Part of Lot 10 (Oro), Township of Oro- Medonte. c) Report No. PD 2005-010, Andria Leigh, Director of Planning, re: Telecommunications Tower Siting Protocol. d) Report No. PD 2005-013, Andria Leigh, Director of Planning, re: New Provincial Policy Statement (PPS). e) Report No. PD 2005-022, Andria Leigh, Director of Planning, re: County of Simcoe Decision on Shoreline Policy Amendment. f) Report No. PD 2005-023, Andria Leigh, Director of Planning, re: Houben, Development Application P-1/91, Concession 10, West Part of Lot 10 (Oro), Township of Oro- Medonte. g) Planning Advisory Committee, minutes of March 14, 2005 meeting. 10. IN-CAMERA: a) Deputy Mayor Hughes, re: Legal Matter. b) Jennifer Zieleniewski, CAO, re: Legal Matter. c) Jennifer Zieleniewski, CAO, re: Legal Matter. d) Jennifer Zieleniewski, CAO, re: Personnel Matter. e) Jennifer Zieleniewski, CAO, re: Personnel Matter. 11. ADJOURNMENT: 3 Co", , ADDENDUM COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING Wednesday, March 23, 2005 5. CORRESPONDENCE: h) Doug Wilson, correspondence dated March 18, 2005 re: Guthrie Community Centre Billboard Advertising. 6. FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND FIRE: i) Deputy Mayor Hughes, re: Arena Board Advertising. 9. BUILDING, PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT: h) Public Meeting Minutes, Re: Proposed Amendment Zoning By-Law, Application No. 2005-ZBA-05, Concession 11, West Part Lot 8, RP 51 R-33214, Part 1, (formerly Medonte), Township of Oro-Medonte, (Duddy). i) Public Meeting Minutes, Re: Proposed Amendment Zoning By-Law, Application No. 2005-ZBA-06, Concession 4, West Part Lot 15, (formerly Oro), Township of Oro- Medonte, (McLean). j) Public Meeting Minutes, Re: Proposed Amendment Zoning By-Law, Application No. 2005-ZBA-07, Concession 5, Part Lot 9, RP 51 R-33403, Part 1, (formerly Oro), Township of Oro-Medonte, (Bidwell). k) Report No. PD 2005-017, Andy Karaiskakis, Junior Planner, re: Zoning By-law Amendment for William and Stella Duddy, Concession 11, West Part of Lot 8, RP 51 R-33214, Part 1 (Medonte), Township of Oro-Medonte. I) Report No. PD 2005-018, Andy Karaiskakis, Junior Planner, re: Zoning By-law Amendment for Joyce McLean, Concession 4, West Part of Lot 15 (Oro), Township of Oro-Medonte. m) Report No. PD 2005-019, Andy Karaiskakis, Junior Planner, re: Zoning By-law Amendment for Glenn Bidwell, Concession 5, Part of Lot 9, RP 51 R-33403, Part 1 (Oro), Township of Oro-Medonte. n) Report No. PD 2005-024, Andria Leigh, Director of Planning, re: 2976 Highway 11 - Concession 7, Lot 20, Plan 1145, Lots 6-8 (Oro), Township of Oro-Medonte Zoning. CPTED REVIEW (Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design) of The Township of Oro-Medonte Parks and Recreation 23 April 2004 1 Site:Various park and recreation area throughout the township Date:23 Apr 04 Description: The parks and recreation areas in the township vary from size tointended use. All are unique with their own distinct issues Some of the sites are within residential areas, while others arequite concealed. 2 ISSUES •Vandalism •Break and Enter to vehicles (arena specifically) •Safety •Proposed areas for Tot site 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 CraighurstPark 16 17 18 19 Horseshoe Valley Pods lane 20 21 22 23 24 VaseyPark 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 Warminister 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 Memorial Park 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 Arena LocationAdvantageDisadvantagePrecautionRecommendation Front of arena•Good signage•Trees & bushes•Entrapment area•Trim up trees and continue to keep bushes low •Remove it •Gives coverage when in bloom and •Bush filled with snow •Entrapment area•Close it off •Open area ~ purpose? 65 LocationAdvantageDisadvantagePrecautionRecommendation Parking area for arena•Celebrated Entrance•Carpeted entrance •Replace carpets damaged •Remove or fix •Ashtray hanging ashtray •Repaint poles •Wires are accessible•Cover and secure all •Easy to cut wires •Hole in ground ~ purpose?•Cover hole •Lighting•Metal Halide •Open and no one •Signage for •Large door for aroundauthorized persons equipment only •Deferred Pop machine maintenance•Close door when no one is there •Repaint Rear of arena •Material on sides •Access to roof •Accessible for sports and top to deter teams getting up •Pointing to the sky •lighting •Have pointing to pop machine 66 LocationAdvantageDisadvantagePrecautionRecommendation Side of arena•Emergency exit?Door, frame and pipe •Shows lack of pride •Repair damage damaged ~ deferred and ownership •Signage maintenance Old fixture still there •Challenge to •Lighting•Remove unused damage fixture Propped open for entry •Keep closed or have •Emergency exit? someone there Leaves isles were cars •False sense of •Change lighting Parking lot lighting are in the darksecurity ~ enough to keep abnormal users comfortable Not used often •See if window •Church ~ Natural All windows are treatments could be survelliance coveredchanged Should it have more •Protected by ballists •Close to parking, Proposed tot lot area Baseballs coming over Close to hitting area•Put up extended pavillion, patrols netting 67 LocationAdvantageDisadvantagePrecautionRecommendation Pavilion•Protection from rain Abnormal users will •Check for drug and •Abnormal users will and sunfeel comfortable here other paraphenaliachoose this instead as it is very darkof play equipment if close by •Trim trees up if any Trees to the ground •Lots of room for tot good protection or Left baseball field activity with young lotpedophiles children is to be close •Defined space for Abnormal users •Tots (and others) Walkway to pavilion•Clean site prior to purposeleaving remnantscould get hurt normal usage time Rear of pavilion •Defined space for Abnormal users •Tots (and others) •Clean site prior to purposeleaving remnantscould get hurt normal usage time Door inside of pavilion •Entry to storageAttempted B&E •Fix and signage •Move to inside of rink Inside of Arena •Pay phone for Close proximity to •Legitimate reason for normal usersplayers change pedophiles to be in rooms and exitarea 68 CraighurstPark LocationAdvantageDisadvantagePrecautionRecommendation Park•Lots of NSTrees planted along •Remove trees fence will block that NS Evergreen’s will block NS, but they are on private property •Place pad in front of Does not look like you net •Separate spaces for really want them to children•Replace or repair net play basket ball •Secure lid •Can be removed, •Septic systembroken, cause injury Lid not secure 69 Horseshoe Valley LocationAdvantageDisadvantagePrecautionRecommendation Pod lane tot lot•New equipmentHidden from NS•Entrapment area of •Thin brush area out normal users •Good layout •Magnet for Fence does not come •Bring fence adventurous completely to groundcompletely to ground children or below •Magnet for •Complete fence Fence does not adventurous around with gate in completely secure children the middle and at the area end 70 Ramey Memorial Park LocationAdvantageDisadvantagePrecautionRecommendation Rink area/skate park•Activities all season Lower boards give •Remove plywood abnormal users and replace with shelterplexiglassor similar material •Remove graffiti, burn Graffiti, burn marks, •Leaving legitimizes marks, and garbage and garbage others to do it ~ shows lack of ownership and pride •Install proper net No net•shows lack of •Basketball hoop ownership and pride Stands•Give audience a •Injury to a child•Clean up any Sheeting left under place to watch from dangers stands •Another activity for Portable skateboard •Secure materials Left unattended for •Injury, damage youth material when not in use abnormal usersand/or theft 71 LocationAdvantageDisadvantagePrecautionRecommendation Outer area of rinkNails not bent down•Injury•Double check all areas •Add signage when Alternate entrance•Gated off open, or to use other entrance •Shut lights off earlier Lighting•Very well litKept on later causes at night abnormal users legitimate reasons to be there •Remove items that Items that show Arena area•Leaving legitimizes have been damaged abnormal usage others to do it ~ shows lack of ownership and pride Storage shed•Storage •Signage on who to No signage for who call if damaged shed belongs or purpose Two light fixtures, only •Fill both sockets or one lightget new fixture Not authorized•Get rid of and put Fire pit•Clear area 72 signage Vasey LocationAdvantageDisadvantagePrecautionRecommendation Pavilion•Shelter from rain and Deferred maintenance•Show lack of •Repaint sun, meeting placeownership and pride •Warmth, cooking•Invitation to use with Fire pitNo grill, protection, •Have a fire pit to wood previously water source nearcode placed •Injury •Show lack of •Area for legitimate Deferred maintenance•Repaint Storage/canteen ownership and pride users Unknown what •Signage purpose it •Leaving legitimizes •Entry/exit Pry marks from Rear of building others to do it ~ attempt B&E shows lack of ownership and pride Deferred maintenance •Repaint Not safe •Extra seating for •injury•Remove or replace bench audience 73 LocationAdvantageDisadvantagePrecautionRecommendation Lighting•Excellent Fence to pasture•Defining spaceIn disrepair•Injury•Speak with owner to fix and signage of Electrified electricity Water valve•Easy accessKey in valveLeaving key could •Remove key invite abnormal user to turn on or remove key •Tripping factor Theft or damage •Remove and place at Grate left at side proper location Washroom wall•Privacy from fieldPrivacy from field •Entrapment areaRemove wall Swings area•Far enough away Very close to forested Easy area for Thin out bush area or from fieldarea pedophiles to watch move swings from •Link between to Lots of hiding places Walkway to other field Entrapment area Thin out bush area on areas sides 74 Warminister LocationAdvantageDisadvantagePrecautionRecommendation Storage shed•Store itemsUnknown what •No show of •Signage purpose isownership Deferred maintenance•Leaving legitimizes Paint others to do it ~ Fix trim work on roof shows lack of Replace broken ownership and pride windows Remove unused light socket or put light in it •NS from roadway park•NS from roadway •Trees trimmed up and no bush area •Easy access to ball diamond Put proper slab and Basket ball hoop Not concrete slab or net net 75 McPhees’Landing LocationAdvantageDisadvantagePrecautionRecommendation Shelter•Shelter from rain, Graffiti •Leaving legitimizes •Remove graffiti sun, rest areaothers to do it ~ shows lack of ownership and pride •Not lit Cannot be seen •Put signage to rest through bush on patharea at path way •Gate across entrance at night •Not lit Parking lot •Ballasts between grass and parking area 76 HawkestonePark LocationAdvantageDisadvantagePrecautionRecommendation Nature walk area•BeautifulTires being used by •Leaving legitimizes •Remove tires and abnormal users, others to do it ~ garbage leaving garbage and shows lack of drug paraphenaliaownership and pride Being used for motor •Leaving legitimizes •Have community Land•Amazing space cross type activitiesothers to do it ~ decide a variety of shows lack of uses for property so ownership and pride normal users are there frequently throughout the day and seasons •Fix or remove •Baseball backing Leaving legitimizes Deferred maintenance and standsothers to do it ~ and graffiti shows lack of ownership and pride Fix railing or remove Leaving legitimizes posts •Was beautiful path Walkway to railings removed others to do it ~ Hawkestone shows lack of ownership and pride Bridge Not cared for fix 77 Memorial Park LocationAdvantageDisadvantagePrecautionRecommendation Pavilion•Shelter from rain, Damage to window •Leaving legitimizes •Fix up and put sun, meeting placearea and wallothers to do it ~ signage of who to shows lack of call for vandalism ownership and pride •Tether tables together •Paint and fix Deferred maintenance •Remove lighting •Able to walk in the False sense of security Lighting park at night •Cover with Light bulbs broken polycarbonate lenses •NS from street •Put other permanent •Leaving legitimizes •Peaceful place to Unilockstone Memorial foundation down others to do it ~ rest and reflect removeable shows lack of ownership and pride •Open area Play area •Leaving legitimizes •Remove brush and •Privacy to change Trees overgrown others to do it ~ Change areafix interior of change outside shows lack of area Deferred maintenance ownership and pride inside •replace./fix post and Posts to prevent Post removed •safety•Post left at side of put up signage vehicular entry building 78 GowanStation Park LocationAdvantageDisadvantagePrecautionRecommendation Rear of Firehall•Signage due to previous damage •Tot lot Green space between Baseball diamond not •Fence in baseball firehalland basketball fenceddiamond court •Lots of NS Basketball •Well used by youth court/hockey surface •Fence in Culvert Injury if child plays •Signage to stay out there 79 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS Excellent park lands with minimal cleanup needed Have local youth and residents take ownership and pride in parks Meet with youth to see what they want and let them know if abused, it will be taken away 80 CPTED EVALUATION This evaluation has been prepared for you by Janet Small, who have been trained and qualified to apply Principles of CPTED in relation to your industry. In using a combination of CPTED principles we have provided our comments to you. This document is not intended to mandate any suggestions or changes, rather it is merely our recommendations based on acquired knowledge and proven principles that we feel will make your industry more secure and less vulnerable to attack. We offer these suggestions and recommendations reminding you that implementing them doesn’t guarantee that your industry will never come under attack. If you have any questions or concerns pertaining to this document, please feel free to contact me at the numbers below; Name:Janet Small Agency:Ontario Provincial Police Address:20 Rose Street, Barrie, Ontario, L4M 2T2 Work Phone:705-726-6484 Cell Phone:705-321-1103 Pager: Signed: 81 . .."1 . . \ -, , THE TIMES THEY ARE A CHANGING Deputation to Oro-Medonte Council Committee of the Whole March 23, 2005 Jim Woodford I have come to praise you - not to berate you. (At least 6 of you) I would like to highly commend Council for establishing the position of Director of Planning. The terms of reference for the position put responsibility for planning advice to the Council on a staff member. They also eliminate the need for day-to-day outside planning advice. I have been a critic of the Township planning process since 2001. I thought I should clear the air before a new era dawns. The Mayor is probably not too pleased with this move - since 2001 I have suggested this in 9 deputations to Council and the Oro Moraine Committee and the Mayor usually spoke in favour of continuing to give major responsibilities to the planning consultant. For example I told the Oro Moraine Committee that it was improper for Nick MacDonald, a consultant, to be chair of the Committee. Mayor Craig vigorously defended Nick. In December, 2003, following criticism of OP A # 16 by the two planners on the Oro Moraine Committee, the Mayor took over as Chair! I first suggested an Ecological Advisory Committee in 2002. Mayor Craig strongly opposed this. If it had been fonned it would have saved tens of thousands of tax dollars and there would be a scientifically sound plan in place to preserve the Oro Moraine. I think it is unconscionable for Oro-Medonte to require a developer to do an Environmental Impact Statement and then not include it in the deeision making process. This should save hundreds of thousands of tax dollars - between Jan.2003 and Aug.2004 the planning consultant was paid $289,000.00. The most glaring example of the desperate need for a new direction in planning in Oro- Medonte is the sad saga of Official Plan Amendment # 16. Work on it started in 2001 - it is tens of thousands of dollars over budget and years behind schedule. There are not adequate provisions to proteet the Oro Moraine ecology. The Azimuth Report on the Natural Features of the Oro Moraine is not completed.Margo Holt, Pat and I met with Mike and Martha Scott to attempt to correct the scientific errors. Martha refused to make any changes. Errors such as reporting the Tufted Titmouse as an . '. . . . ~ endangered species on the Oro Moraine - perhaps because it has never been seen there and botanical taxonomy that is 40 years out-of-date. I look forward to meeting and fully cooperating with the new Director of Planning. I would like to suggest an addition to the Director of Planning job Description. On page 4 under Knowledge a new Section g) Shall not work or consult for any private company or organization. Now the other reason I am here. It is time to establish a Legal Department and hire a full-time lawyer. For a lot fewer tax dollars that Chris Williams is being paid Council could hire an experienced and well-qualified lawyer. There are local lawyers who would be delighted to be a full-time lawyer for the Township for the fee paid for the Oro Lea case. The Oro Lea (Plan 709) dramatically points this out. The Toronto lawyer acting for the residents charged $35,000. Chris Williams acting for the Township billed $147,000. It is alleged that some hours were billed at $650.00. It is alleged that Chris Williams advised the Township to appeal a court decision on Oro Lea (Plan 709) - then before the appeal was heard he recommended that the Township pay the residents legal costs of $35,000 to settle the case out-of-court. It would be in the best interests of the Oro-Medonte taxpayers if Council sought a legal opinion if there were grounds to have the Law Society of Upper Canada investigate the $147,000 billing. ~ ...-c::~. G .y,riii"y,' q+' .... KG -, e./'s+' . "!<~'m . J , " The Corporation of the (705) 726-9300 Fax: (705) 726-9832 County of Simcoe CORPORATE SERVICES DEPARTMENT Administration Centre ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION 1110 Hwy. 26 Telephone Extension 181 Midhurst. Ontario LOL 1 XO 23rd February 2005 Mayor J. Neil Craig I RECEIVED Township ofOro Medonte 148 Line 7 South, Box 100, MAR u 1 2005 Oro, On LOL 2XO ORO'MEDONTE Dear Mayor Craig: TOWNSHIP Re: Waste/Recvcling Collection within the Township of Oro Medonte We thank you for your letter dated the 26th January, providing feedback with concerns and suggestions, regarding the waste collection service. The responses have been itemized to respond to your qucstions as follows: . Weather related cancellations are detennined as follows, Corporate Services Committee report CS05-058 to February's County Council regarding weather cancellations, is enclosed for your information: I. Outright cancellations in morning due to weather conditions, 2. Delayed start time due to weather/road conditions, 3. Partial cancellations during the day. . Customer Service has outlined their procedure as follows in regards to cancellations or delays in collections: I. The County's home page provides a link to waste/recycling delays, 2. An announcement in the Customer Service queue is played to callers waiting to speak with a representative, 3. Area municipalities are notified by Customer Service staff of any disruption to service that affects collections, 4. For residents ofOro Medonte, the following radio stations are being used to communicate any waste and recycling cancellations or delays due to poor weather conditions: 1. BIOI IV. Rock 95 H. Chay93.1 v. Easy Rock 97.3 HI. Star 107 VI. Jack FM . Staff at all County waste sites continually monitor contractors' compliance with health and safety protocol and bring any issues to the attention of their site supervisors, these concerns are then brought to the attention of the contractors for resolution. . r .... (2) -'l - .. . The County completed an audit on all the collection contractors last summer, by monitoring curbside perfonnance in each municipality. The purpose of the audit was to ensure compliance with the contract. In reviewing the concerns brought forth from the audit, it does not appear that any safety issues were highlighted at that time. However, as a follow-up to this audit, the County has budgeted for a Collections Auditor in the year 2005, and staff hopes to have this position in place by early summer. As well as monitoring curbside collection practices, any safety aspects and concerns noticed regarding collection contractors will be brought to the attention of the appropriate manager. Please note that currently contractors are made aware of any safety issues brought to the County's attention from residents, municipal staff, or other contractors for their immediate follow-up. Customer Service staff has also compiled reported issues for December and January as follows: I. Excess Speed Complaints 0 2. Christmas Tree collection late 7 3. Blue Boxes not collected Line 13 I 4. Blue Boxes not collected Bass Lake 2 5. Blue Boxes missed - general error 14* 6. Blue Boxes missed - weather related 8 7. Blue Boxes missed - access related 5 8. Blue Boxes out late 4 9. Waste collection driver driving on lawn I 10. Waste driver bitten by dog I II. Waste missed - general error 22* 12. Waste missed - weather related 9 13. Waste missed - access related I 14. Waste not collected - ineligible 4 15. Waste - partial pick-up 3 16. Waste - out late 4 17. Waste - unit count clarificalion requested 15 Total Issues 101 1.1 issues per 1,000 service events 'General error cannot he further defined as to whether contractor or resident error We did confinn with the contractor that Christmas Tree collection was completed in the Township, and any incidental trees have been picked-up by the contractor as they have been advised. The contractor has also been advised of your general concerns regarding excess speed, placement of blue boxes, garbage cans and lids. The comments you have received from small business operators regarding bag tags have been passed to our Finance Department for consideration and response. We trust the above addresses the concerns from both the Township and Councillor Hough. Once again we would like to thank you for your input, which assists us in communicating with the contractor to provide improved service to our residents. Yours sincerely, r----y . vVaudrat. . Tiina Nautras Contracts & Collections Supervisor Copy: Councillor Hough, Township ofOro Medonte Ene: Corporate Services Item CS05-058 x:\corporate services\environmental services\swm\mun\oromed\05\letter nc concerns waste collection service.doc - .-' .. \ \' COUNTY OF SIMCOE f)<A - .J , ITEM FOR: CORPORATE SERVICES COMMITTEE SECTION: Environmental ITEM NO. CS 05-058 MEETING DATE: February 9, 2005 SUBJECT: Waste Collection Weather Cancellations RECOMMENDATION: THAT the recommendations for managing weather related waste collection cancellations as noted within Item No. CS 05-058 be approved and implemented to the extent possible based on current collection contracts. BACKGROUND: Disruptions to waste collection services due to inclement weather are handled in a variety of ways and staff has listed below some common scenarios and the recommended resolution in each instance based on current practices, supplemented with better information sharing techniques between the County and residents and the County and the Municipalities: Potential weather related Possible Resolutions sccnarios Outright cancellation in Staff recommended resolution morning due to weather . Double collection on next collection day (as advertised in conditions 2005 Calendar) . Public Service announcements on local radio stations . Customer Service Line announcement . Faxes to the municipal offices in each affected area . Infonnation posted on County website . Allow bagging (in clear bags) of properly sorted recyclables to manage additional storage requirements. Alternates . Move all collections ahead one day (not advertised in calendar, potential for confusion for residents for the remainder of the collection week) . Collection in the cancelled area the next day (contractor requires double equipment and staff for one day, no guarantee weather will co-operate) Delayed start time due to Staff recommended resolution weather/road conditions, . Contractor to directly contact local municipality regarding salting and sanding if road conditions are delaying collection . Contractor returns to uncollected area later in the day if possible, and the next day until collection completed. If -" \)C\ - February 9, 2005 Corporate Services Committee CS 05-058 Page 2 unable to complete collection contractor to collect double the next collection day. (In these instances contractor to advise locations missed) . County staff extends operating hours at waste disposal sites to accommodate contractors working later, in these instances. However, Certificate of Approval constraints may limit extensions to operating hours and health & safety of site attendants due to limited daylight hours is also taken into consideration. Alternates . Contractor returns to uncollected area on Saturday (residents may forget to put out, and if missed collection was on a Monday or Tuesday residents will be getting collection twice in the space of 3 or 4 days. Partial cancellation during Staff recommended resolution the day . Contractor to directly contact local municipality regarding salting and sanding if cancellation due to road conditions . Contractor returns to uncollected area later in the day if possible, and the next day until collection completed. If unable to complete collection contractor to collect double the next collection day. (In these instances contractor to advise locations missed) Other resolutions . Contractor returns to uncollected area on Saturday (residents may forget to put out, and if missed collection was on a Monday or Tuesday residents will be getting collection twice in the space of 3 or 4 days. In the winter months collection is very dependent upon weather conditions, and road class. It is understood that main arteries and bus/school bus routes take priority, when plowing/salting/sanding is scheduled. Staff tries to work with the contractor for each weather related occurrence to develop the most reasonable resolutions in that particular instance. Factors that have to be considered by the contractor are, the safety of their drivers as well as residents, equipment being out-of-commission due to vehicles sliding into the ditch etc., property damage issues due to vehicles attempting to access areas that have not been sanded/salted. The County is also restricted as to operating hours at its waste disposal sites under the Certificates of Approval issued by the Ministry of the Environment. Shorter daylight hours during the winter months also restrict operations for site staff. In areas where collection cannot be undertaken due to roads not being ploughed or salted/sanded the contractor has made the attempt and in some instances it may not be feasible to return later. Contractor Guidelines have been developed to cover the above common weather related scenarios, as well as some other issues, and are attached as Schedule I. Staff suggests that the contractors be provided a contact name at each local municipality, in order to directly discuss road conditions should these be hindering collections. Staff will circulate this report to all municipal Public Works Directors, and request that municipalities submit a contact name. Please note that as new contracts are being let, a penalty clause has been inserted for reimbursement to the County of % of one-day's collection costs, should the contractor detennine that due to . ......, - . February 9, 2005 Corporate Services Committee CS 05-058 Page 3 weather conditions collection is being cancelled outright or partially and as such the contractor would not be considered to be in a cost saving position with the cancellation of waste collection.. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS: There is no impact on the County's 2005 Environmental Services budget as a result of this item with the recommendations as listed. SCHEDULES: The following schedule is attached and fonns part of this item. Schedule I - Contractor Guidelines. ~ " Schedule I to C505-058 PREPARED BY: Tiina Nautras I Rob McCullough APPROVALS: Date: Mark Aitken, Acting Chief Administrative Officer February 2, 2005 . . . 1)q -\p . Schedule 1 Corporate Services Committee Item CS05-058 Page 1 of 2 County of Simcoe Waste Collection - Contractor Guidelines January 2005 I Ba!!/Can Size & Wei!!ht Limit . If the bag/can is oversize but within the 20 kgs. weight requirement the material should be taken, (within reason e.g. large bag of Styrofoam not OK. 45 gall. Drum not OK), cans greater than 121 L will he considered as garbage boxes, . If the can contains smaJler bags (i.e. kitchen catchers), or loose garbage and can be lifted and is within the 20 kgs. weight requirement the materiaJ should be taken, cans greater than 121 L will be considered as garbage hoxes, and loose garbage should he bagged in standard sized garbage hags. . CSRs to promote standard can and hag size to caJlers. i.e. jumho bags and larger cans have potential to be picked-up now if within weight limit. however if weight limit is exceeded in the future they will be left hehind. This could cause confusion to resident as they will say they have always used this bag/can size and it was picked-up before. Residents should be informed that cans greater than 121 L will be considered as garbage boxcs. Multi-Unit verification . If a location requires clarification as to how many eligible units, and it is determined that they are eligible for multiple units. any bags (within the new limit) left behind the previous week should be included in the pick-up for the following week, (this is based on the fact that the location is being charged for multiple units), this is a one-time concession only. . Any locations that cannot be identified as multiple units. and where municipal input is required. and it is going to take some time to get a response. residents should be nolifled that we are going through the process and working with the local municipality, and hope to get an answer as soon as possible. To ensure collection please use tags on additionaJ waste. . In places like New Tecumseth and Innisfil where the bag limit was 2/week with any additionaJ bags havIng to have tags. this should not be an issue as limits have not changed herc and any multi-unit locations should have been resolved previously. - CSRs should enquire what has prompted this call- as there has been no change to limits in this area.? Weather Conditions (Weather related misses/late collection - residents to be advised as follows) . Late . The contractor is running behind due to bad weather and/or road conditions, . We cannot guarantee that they will make it to your location, if not collected by noon tomorrow double will be collected on the next collection day, . Contractor to have list of roads for double collection. . Outright cancellation . Double will be collected the next collection day. . Contractor to have list of roads for double collection. Late/missed collection due to contractor issues . Any areas missed due to new drivers, illness, etc.. contractor will return later the same day or the next business day(s) to collect material .' ~ . ~CA,- . . ISchedule 1 Co roo rate Services Committee Item CS05-058 Paoe 2 of 2 I County of Simcoe Waste Collection - Contractor Guidelines January 2005 2 . Any areas missed due to contractor's operational difficulties (equipment breakdowns etc.) contractor will return later the same day or the next business day(s). NOTE: . Missed Garbage - New Issue since 2-hag limit. Quite often homeowners see garbage put out on the street and run out with theirs thinking they will make the collection vehicle. Then when theirs is not picked-up they phone saying the whole street has been missed. However, these are bags that have been left behind for a reason (overweight, over limit). CSRs should check faxed contractor sheets to see if notation has been made of the street name indicating bags left behInd, or call contractor to clarify if street has been collected. THE CORPORA,TION OF THE \=)q =1, 148 Line '/ S.. nox iOO 0 W N F'( 1 n 010. Oni/,do LOt. 2.XO ~ C) 1 ~ P;KH";C oor)) .487.2]"/ j .L f70S:; 481"0) :3:; ;C'v_ WVV'N .oro--rnedon ic ,Ci" ~ January 26, 2005 County of Simcoe Administration Centre 1110 Hwy. #26 MIDHURST, Ontario LOL 1XO ATTENTION: Ms. Tiina Nautras Contracts and Collection Supervisor Re: Waste/Recvclinq Collection within the Township of Oro-Medonte Dear Ms. Nautras: I would like to take this opportunity to recognize the efforts the County has made in the provision of Waste Collection and Recycling services to the residents of Oro-Medonte. In an endeavour to enhance this service, the following concerns and suggestions are put forward on behalf of Council. Residents of the Township have made their Council representatives aware of the apparent lack of information with respect to cancellation protocols and the dissemination of cancellation information to residents, particularly in circumstances where on-going cancellations occur. As well, reservations relating to the performance of the contractor in making these collections and the safety aspects in truck operation (excess speed, placement of blue boxes, garbage cans and lids after collection) were mentioned. In an attempt to communicate more effectively with our residents, I would request, on behalf of Council, that the County . clarify what determines cancellation of collections, . clarify what procedures are in place to make residents aware of cancellations (Le. which local media are made aware of cancellations) . clarify any monitoring procedures with respect to safety aspects of collection by the contractor On the matter of tag distribution, several outlets are available in the Township. However, some small business operators have expressed reservations with the requirement that they must front end the sale of tags. Reconsideration of this policy and the limits it places on the number of distribution centres for tags is respectfully requested. j )0, - I would like to mention that Councillor Ralph Hough has had occasion to call the County Service Centre with respect to this matter and has spoken to Lesley who was most helpful in answering his queries to the best of her ability. It would be appreciated if Councillor Hough's comments, attached, could be considered in your response. The Councillor also noted that Christmas Tree collection in his area has not occurred as yet. For further information, he can be reached at 835-2770 or e-mail ralph. houqh@oro-medonte.ca. Thank you for your attention to this matter; your earliest response would be appreciated. 9 ~~ J. Neil Craig Mayor Attach. c.c. Members of Council Page I of2 . '. R '" \ tj J'v'l - \ Main Identity From: "Ralph & Wendy Hough" <rhtigerman@sprint.ca> To: "Ruth Fountain" <ruth.fountain@oro-medonte,ca>; "Paul Marahall" <pauLmarshall@oro- medonte,ca>; "John Crawford" <john,crawford@oro-medonte.ca>: "Dan Buttineau" <dan.buttineau@oro-medonte,ca>: "Harry Hughes" <harry,hughes@oro-medonte.ca>; "Neil Craig" <neil.craig@oro-medonte,ca> cc: <cao@oro-medonte>: <publicworks@oro-medonte> Sent: Tuesday, January 11,2005 10:23 AM Subject: Recycling pick-up Hi everyone. Just for your information, especially Neil and Harry when the garbage contract comes up for renewal. On Friday morning January 7th. I received a call from a resident that lives on Line 13 at Bass Lake complaining that his blue box had not been collected on Thursday. I advised him that none in our area had been done either. He advised me he had called the County, The Township and Mid Ontario and had not been able to get a straight answer. I called the County and spoke with Lesley, who advised me she would check with Mid Ontario and call me back. I did advise her that I was a Councilor and had received complaints. She did call back and advised me that in some areas of our Township the roads were not safe for the truck to go down. I advised her that the garbage truck had been and done the pick up on Thursday. She then said that on some of our roads with hills the truck had picked up the blue boxes on one side of the road but could not stop on the way down the hills to make the pick up. She then told me that one of the recycling trucks had been involved in an accident earlier in the week and this had put them behind schedule. They would be doing Warminster on Friday and should have everything cleared up by the weekend. I do know that sometime over the weekend Warminster was done as was Line 10, the Eady Station Road and the Mount S1. Louis Road. Ours on Line 11 was not picked up. On Monday, January 10th. one of my neighbours came to the house to complain about this. I was not home but he spoke with Wendy. He told her he had also phoned the County several times and had been given the run around by a young guy that answered the phone. I was not able to check with the County on Monday as the office was closed before I got home. On Tuesday morning, January 11th. I again called the County and spoke with Lesley. I told her that J had received another complaint from my neighbour and I know that the blue boxes had not been picked up on Line 11 North between the Mount S1. Louis Road and the Eady Station Road. I could not tell her if the rest of Line 11 had been done as I had not been along the road over the weekend. She again said she would cal! Mid Ontario and get back to me. 1/11/05 Page 2 of2 . So, - \ \ She did call back a few minutes later and told me that the supervisor, who was not very familiar with the area had in fact done the route on Saturday and all the blue boxes that were out had been picked up and they would not come back. She suggested we either bring it back in till the next scheduled pick up or take it to the dump on the Old Barrie Road. I told her that I already had two blue boxes full, one cardboard box full of cardboard and a basket fuff of cans and was running out of containers and space. I also told her the dump was about a 25 mile round trip for me and even if I took mine, which I wouldn't, it did not solve the problem for the rest of the neighbours. I asked her to call back to Mid Ontario and tell the supervisor that it was a Council member that was complaining and I did not like the inference that our blue boxes had not been put out or they would have been picked up. I know for a fact that mine and our neighbours were put out on Thursday and I expected them to honour their contract. She did call me back and advised that she had spoken with the operations manager and he would take a drive out this way either today or tomorrow but could not promise it would be today. As Keith Matheson knows this is not the first time our area has been missed as f get complaints about Christmas trees not being picked up along our road almost every year. I am not sure why the new policy states that garbage cans must be placed out with a lid on them. I have not put lids on ours for years. The guy's that do the pick up seem to just have a ball playing frisbee with them and I got sick on wading through deep snow to retrieve them in the winter. I will update you on Wednesday of any developments. Ralph 1/1 ]/05 - ,- ~ -- JOHN PAGE, 24 MYRTLE AV. RR#2 HAWKESTONE ONT.,LOL 1 TO February 14, 2005 RECEIVED MAR 0 .4 2005 The Corporation of the Township of Ora-Medonte ORO-MEDONTE P.O. Box tOO Oro, Ont., LOI2XO TOWNSHIP Dear Mayor & Council Members - Ora-Medonte: Re: (J(}24 Myrde Ave, Plan 626 Lots 72&:73 RoU# 4346-010-011-017tJ(j..(J()(J(} It has come to our attention as a result of a recent survey that the original 40 year old structure associated with 24 Myrtle Ave is encroaching on Promenade/Road AJlowance. From the attached survey (plan-3348) it can be seen that the original structure is encroaching by up to 11.8 feet of Promenade/Road Allowance lands. To our knowledge the original structures as well as all other additions have been built with the appropriate building permit approvals rC9uired at time of construction and were inspected and approved by Oro-Medonte building officials. At this time we would ask the Mayor and Council to review- this encroachment issue and determine if the property being encroached upon could be sold, leased or if some form of minor variance can be approved to resolve this encroachment. If there is a process or formal application which we need to initiate please let us know and we will proceed with any official application or approval process. We look forward to your response to this request. Sincerely, ~:h 24 MYRTLE AVE HAWKES TONE ONT 487-0411, FAX 416-207.5717 -,- '~ ...0.0 I I -.9 ;;, \ ul N W \ ~ 11' I . :t 101 t. '- .~, \ ' ... :> <{ ul .. '1\ 6 ' ' <<.%..1000 ~"'(f to"''''',j \II ""I \ · > z ~ oS 0 :i :', ',,-" t \ ~ <<\I1"ui _w '(,"J \J :),..~a.\L.\S'\.J ~~ onl-.I 0..< ,"' ' "Z I- ~ l\. 0 'ill ''0 ~ ~ ' 'ao~~i> ,)00 \ ~..1.1.\J\r ",to- _1.'- .( \S.a~j .J \- 0 (t ~. 0 \ o.<jul~~\) \Lov o'i\( u\ o '" 1. \1\ '1 !--- _._-- 0 I, . _ <1- ,- .. ~ t"" ,I / ui "I I- ',.I I'. 0 · ;: <1- , _,.J . o(~'Q 0 3. () '" _ 0 \- '" - () 0'66 'Mb,",o"'''' N 0( N ~ ~ ~ .\ .. p~_Y,"" ," ,.... . . . 'i ~ Z;>-""",,,,~ ~ ,. , oj , " . ; _. _ 1J1\ ," . ,'" wI> ~ ,J ,_ It':! Q' ~. ~ " '. ~\ - V It ~. ..\ , "' ~ ,".\0 Q <;\ \I.J ~.'".... \.;,<OC~ci V ",' \ "" - .,., 0 ~--. <{ ,,' J'" ' \ ....... ...... "',' - ~.. ,'~'}:" ~,,~ . , O.-t_,_Mb"O<ry~" ",' W ~ ~ ~ ~ tc\ ~ If I · ~: ~ \\ o u\ I .J ou} \ ~. . _'_ / /,: .J ' ~ l- f> It ~, \ 2)- \ ~ . TOWNSHIP OF SPRINGWATER 5c Simcoe County Administration Centre, Midhurst, Ontario LOL 1XO Phone No. (705) 728-4784 Fax No. (705) 728-6957 Website: www.sprinQwater.ca E-mail: erath@sprinQwater.ca March 4, 2005 To: Simcoe County Municipalities Dear Council Members: RE: Mayor's Annual Log-Sawing Contest - Elmvale Maple Syrup Festival It is my great pleasure to invite you to the Mayor's Annual Log-Sawing Contest taking place at the 2005 Elmvale Maple Syrup Festival. This year's Festival occurs on Saturday, April 23rd, with the Log-Sawing Contest scheduled to commence at 1 :OOpm. We are asking all participants to meet at the Main Stage (corner of Yonge and Queen Streets) at 12:30pm in preparation for the competition. As in previous years, the invitation has been extended to a number of local dignitaries, including area MPs, MPPs, and representatives from neighbouring municipal councils. I hope to see everyone out to support this worthwhile and fun community event. Please contact Conor Begley at cbeQlev@sprinQwater.ca or via telephone at 728-4784 ext. 239 to RSVP with the names of your lumberjacks. Sincerely, \~\ (h-\.(f(l_vy~ John Brown Mayor lcpb Sci-\ Oro-!vledonte Chamber of Commerce 148 Line 7 5'oulh, Box 100 2XO 705-487-7337 March 17.2005 Mayor and Council Township of Oro-Mcdontc 148 Line 7 South Oro, ON LOL 2XO Refcrcncc: Annual Awards Dinner Dcar Mayor and Mcmbers of Council: The Oro-Medonte Chambcr of Commerce will bc hosting its annual business achievemcnt awards presentation and dinner Monday, April 4th and wishes to extend a special invitation to Your Worship and allmcmbers of Council. This ycar's cvent is bcing held at The Heights of Horseshoe and features a ncw food venue. We look j()fward to ha ling you and mcmhers of Council attend. Please RVSP by March 30, 2005. Sinccrcly, Judy Kern Managing Director RECEIVED MAR 1 7 2005 ORO-MEDONTE TOWNSHIP Oro-:Meaonte Chamber of Commerce 5d-~ 2004 'Business .Jtcfiievement .JtwardS T .Jt5T'E 'EXTRJt Y .Jt0'~.Jt & SIL'ENT .Jtl1CTION :Monday Ayri{ 4, 2005 'llie J{eiglits of J{orseslioe, 1106 J{orseslioe lIa{{ey 'Road CocktaiCs - 5:30 y.m. 'Dinner - 7 y.m. Come taste Oro-Medonte's finest cuisine, served 6y the area's most yoyufar esta6[ishments crudites & cheese Tratter Craigfiurst I(iA -~-~ Ayyetizer :Ffam6e of 'Escargots in jagermeister with Roast (jarac, sha[lOts and Cream on a :Mini Roesti Totato Si[k's of Ji() rsesfi oe Resort ---- Butternut Squash Soup & Savory Chicken Safad Lo06ies Restaurant ---- Boeuf Bourguignonne :Fresh A[6erta 'lhpfe .J\ Round Steak marinated in RedWine with Lean Mayfe Cured Bacon ancf Sha[[ots served in a Ii o{-au- Ii ent Octopuses ~iarden ---- Rosemary Chicken' (jri[fedBreast of Chicken tossed with a Medfey of Mushrooms ancf :Fresh liegeta6fes :H()mestead' Sett[ers' (ifiost ---- liegetarian Creye Jfer6 Creyes fi[fed with MarinatedRoastedliegeta6fes A660tt's or Craigfiurst ---- :Assorted Jfomemade Tie & Ice Cream Ayp[e or:My 1'ie ---- 1idfJian Chocofates :Assorted .J\rtisana[7'rufffes & Icewine chocofates cfieG'ea Cfioco[ales ---- Non-.'Mem6ers We{come - Tickets 011['1 $35 To order tickets carr 487-7337 or emai{: i11fo@oromedontecc.com Veadune for reservations .March 30, 2005 ':Menu items 5UVject to cnanBe MAH - Province Helps Simcoe County Plan For The Future . /)t - \ @ Ontario Minislry of MUJ Affairs and H I cen'IY.a1 site I feedb.ack I search I site m ""'I~:at.,~iiT + ~ " About the Ministry Related Links" Careers Reference Centre Newsroom SitE Homf;:. / .!'~tt;~W-$LQgm / i:urreB.LN~~U3el~Q_sj~_~_ / Province Helps Simcoe County... Province Helps Simcoe County Plan For The Future Invests In Action Plan To Ensure Sustainable Development For Immediate Release March 10, 2005 TORONTO - The Ontario government Is working with iocal governments in Simcoe County and the surrounding area to address local development pressures, Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing Minister John Gerretsen said today. "Past governments' piecemeal planning has threatened both the environment and the sustainability of development in Simcoe County," said Gerretsen. "A comprehensive study of Simcoe County's watersh. capacity and infrastructure will ensure governments make more informed decisions on future development proposals." The government is providing $2.25 million toward the development of the action plan, which is support by all affected municipal councils. The plan will include the study of the Lake Simcoe and Nottawasaga River watersheds and their ability to handle population growth and development envisioned for the are It will also examine the capacity of existing infrastructure, an appropriate level of development for the future and more effective municipal governance structures. The Province began talks with municipal governments in Simcoe in August 2004 about ways to deal wit persistent growth pressures experienced by the area. Gerretsen proposed the intergovernmental actio plan in December, and has since received unanimous support from municipal councils. "Simcoe's municipal leaders deserve credit for their ability to look to the future needs of their communities," said Gerretsen. "This plan will help protect the environment in Simcoe County while ensuring present and future development is fiscally sustainable. We are committed to safe, strong communities - that means developing long-range planning solutions in cooperation with local governments to deal with growth and development in central Ontario." - 30 - .6ackgrounde,G_lntemovemmental ActionPliJn forSimcoe,6iJrrie And OrllUiJ Contacts: Patti Munce Minister's Office (416) 585-6333 Bev Hendry Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing (416) 585-6200 http://www.mah.gov.on.caluserfiles/HTML/nts_I_23551_ I.html 3/14/2005 MAR, - Intergovernmental Action Plan for Simcoe, Barrie and Orillia - @ Ontario MinisII)' of Mru Affairs and H I c.;:n1:ral site I feedback j search J site m "'1~u.."iliT ,. ~ "' About the Ministry" Related links Careen, Reference Centre" Newsroom ~ Sit*, Home / J'~~.w.$.t90m I ~J,![[gntJ~,g~1s.9LQ_!'!D9~L$.1 Intergovernmental Action... Intergovernmental Action Plan for Simcoe, Barrie and Orillia March 10, 2005 The Intergovernmental Action Plan involving the Province and Simcoe area municipalities will address concerns about population growth and development pressures, and help municipalities plan for the future. Specifically, the plan will gather information about the Lake Simcoe and Nottawasaga River watershed~ and their ability to accommodate added usage of water and sewer systems that would come with additional urban development in the area. It will also examine the state of the water and sewer systen that serve the existing population. The action plan consists of four formal phases. Phase I Assimilative capacity studies of the Lake Simcoe and Nottawasaga River watersheds and their ability to handle growth and development. Phase II Infrastructure studies and the development of a master plan to accommodate approved growth and development. Phase III The assessment of future growth potential, considering water capacity and findings on the capacity of existing infrastructure. Phase IV The implementation of plans deemed necessary following consideration of the information gathered in the first three phases. The government will contribute $2.25 million in total for work on action plan studies. The Province will contribute the total cost of $1.5 million for the assimilative capacity watershed studies in Phase 1. The government will contribute an additional $750,000 to cover half of the costs of the remaining three components of the action plan. Partner municipalities will pay any remaining costs. Discussions on the action plan, led by the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, began in August 2004. Discussions included representatives from the ministries of Public Infrastructure Renewal, Environment and Natural Resources. http://www.mah.gov.on.caluserfiles/HTML/nts I 23549 I.html 3/14/2005 MAH.- Intergovernmental Action Plan for Simcoe, Barrie and Orillia - Planning for studies associated with the action plan began in December 2004. All four phases are expected to be complete by June 2006. Partner Municipalities Municipalities involved in the action plan include: . Simcoe County . City of Barrie . Township of Adjala- Tosorontio . Town of Bradford West Gwillimbury . Township of Clearview . Town of Collingwood . Township of Essa . Town of Innisfil . Town of Midland . Town of New Tecumseth . Township of Oro-Medonte . Town of Penetanguishene . Township of Ramara . Township of Severn . Township of Springwater . Township of Tay . Township of Tiny . Town of Wasaga Beach . City of Ori II ia Related Initiatives The Government of Ontario has a number of initiatives underway that address growth and developmen on a wider scale. The Provincial Policy Statement provides for appropriate development while protecting resources of provincial interest, public health and safety, and the quality of the natural environment. The Provincial Policy Statement supports improved land use planning and management, which contributes to a more effective and efficient land use planning system. The proposed Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, including Simcoe County, will realize the vision for how the region should grow over the next 30 years. The proposed plan will address growth concerns such as infrastructure needs, and protection for natural heritage and natural resources. Watershed-based source protection is a key recommendation of the Walkerton inquiry. Draft iegislatio if passed, would require the development and approval of watershed-based source protection plans. The Greenbelt will help contain urban sprawl and improve the quality of life in the Golden Horseshoe. The proposed Greenbelt area represents a focussed approach to protecting the environmentally sensiti' and agricultural lands in the Golden Horseshoe that are most threatened by urban development. - 30- Contact: Bev Hendry Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing (416) 585-6200 http://www.mah.gov.on.ca/userfiles/HTML/nts_I _23549 _I.html 3/14/2005 J 5'0 1~ H ~ Ann BUdge iiJJ v o{-.,*, C(;) 2. 0 .') S' ,iJ? (j 13 ~ck, ~ ((((.it 4 MAR 1 1 2005 (~rA ') I ORO-MEDONTE ~:1i ~~~~~ ~~~ TOWNSHIP c~~ Lol< 11-:00 I (0))- ?;..<>$'- 31)'6 Ufo- ~ I~ ili M /:' c.">! ~-r,,- ~~ , ~ OA-- ~~~ lA.-~ ~ c~ ?cuJ CA- ~ cu~ ~I~^\~ICQ~~\J~) ~ ~~~\)~ bolbx.k~-_ ,~~) O/VJ. <6)~ ~ s~~~}ttk, ~ -\~(f_~~"~o, ~ ,~~ ~ '-V~l- a~ ~0 J:..<L~ ~~<).~~. , Th '~ \j~ ii" ~~ " '-0~"~ .~ -<-0~T~ ' ' " ~\J<:J. -\'V~l , ~ s1~~ ~.') ~ 4~~ ~~~l- ~~) ), - ~ ~ 'b NJ. [\ ;~~ cL~,~ re~tQ 0~--': ~~~ (. _~ ~)) ,~ \~w~\\) 0- (k-v~t \W-0~ c~ ~ ~L..-c\. ~ (J'f \)Q~~ ~ 3 ~J) \t'v\ft.~) ~~ jv:,o' (bJJ1P::d..-I)' t( *'. (10fu vtV0 ~ ~ On~ rt~la~'te. ~I t-v ~ ~~'0cvk f_ ~ - -.. (.~~'oj' ~l ~\\ ~Jet ~~ ~'Vv~ ~A ?6' ~ )., J _'" . -~' ~)'~ c.L~V'4J ~~(~~ S\b~ ~ +k~~ ~~~ ~~~)) ~::') ~\ ~(~') _~ ~ ~~'), ~ ~~) ~-v.Ul4-\~ ~-~ \aQ ""'~ c~ ~'JCLl~ +-L:. M-- ~~- ~ ~t 'oooA v,,^, \)r. <{_Qc~\ () V ~~~' ~ k~ ~ { dx~~ i,r.-..; \ - ""j ~ ~~ u1:v, '~~~v*~ bt~~-LR. v~ ~ ~ '~~1~1"'~v~ ~ , " ~ ~'~ ~~ \ \) ~~:k " ~, 0'><A,. Q'N'L ',' u,'-C.V.,' / / ,.12 &.ei\A.' ' i ~ ~ /Lu ~I\ 0~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ '; " , <' ~, ~ ~, 2' _ '~'f' - . o.~~\.-, a,o ~~ 'i4 ~ \~ c'~/N" . I) +\~~~, ~)"'''~&; ./{, ~ Fit to Eat P d \. b ,s~c S,;""~,~ry(_.",, Wholesome Recipes for Active PeopJe rocee 5 to eneflt 'oooo't,oo""""",,, I""""","."",..,, SPORT MEDICINE COUNCIL OF CANADA . t;;~ _ \ \J RECEIVED Feb 25th, 2005 MAR 1 1 2005 Mayor and Members of Council ORO-MEDONTE Box 100 Oro-Medonte TOWNSHIP LOL2XO Dear; Mayor and Members of Council On February the 8th, 2005 I was travelling west on Mount St. Louis Rd E on my way to work. I could see that the road was very icy that morning and I was driving particularly slow. As I approached a very bad section of the road just past Line 12th I could see lights rrom another vehiele approaching. The ice build up on the road made it very diffieult to steer and there was not a stitch of sand on the road. As I tried to move more to the right side of the road my tires got stuck in the ruts of ice (that were approximately 8 inchs thick) and eaused me to lose control of my vehiele. I went heading straight for the ditch, where I plunged in and my vehiele came to rest on its side. The lights that I had seen coming was a truck and the driver quickly came to my aid helping me out of my vehiele rrom the passenger side door as the whole left side of my vehiele was buried in snow. I was taken to the Emergency Room by my husband (on the advise of the Firefighters who showed up that day as someone passing by called 911) where I spent the whole day under observation (see letter enelosed) as I was 5 months pregnant at the time. Fortunately the baby was fine after under going a few tests and I was finally able to leave at 8:30 pm that evening. I cannot explain the fear that I experieneed that morning as I was heading for the ditch seeing all those trees. Thank goodness I was going slowly and my vehicle stopped when I hit the deep snow in the ditch. I had a few questions and concerns about what happened that day, so I called the Oro- Medonte Township Office the following day, to ask about the roads and inquire about why they were not better maintained. I was put through to Jerry Ball and I was basically told by him that it was a bad seetion of the road and not much could be done about it. Obviously something could be done about it, I said as the road was pretty much fixed now. I asked him why had the road been grated today and not two weeks ago as it had been bad for about two weeks. He said something about temperature, which is just not true because the day the road was grated down; the temperature was -5, which was the coldest day we had had in a two week period. I feel the road was fixed as someone knew they were at fault. There was no reason the road should have been in that poor of a condition other than lack of coneern and poor maintenance. Everyone who stopped that day (ineluding the Fire Department) could not believe the poor shape ofthe road. It was not something that happened over night as the ice had been building up for weeks. s - My question to you Mayor, and Members of Council is why was the road not better maintained? Why did someone have to go in to the ditch before the road was grated down? I feel you are responsible for ensuring the road is properly maintained which was not the case on February 8th. I feel it will be in your best interest to cover the damages to my vehicle which are about $1, 200.00 (fonnal quote can be provided) to have my drivers side door fixed. Enclosed you will find a letter and petition; as when speaking with my Councilor, Ralph Hough; he said that he brings our roads up every year at budget time and it comes back that no one ever complains.. ...well hear us now as we are complaining. I look forward to your response. / ,;/<' -~--~~ ! 1608 Mt St. Louis Rd E RR # 2 Coldwater On LOK IEO ,.... h J - \hl.@@~~([Jm CANAn< " AWARDS FOR ' ~ SOLDIERS'L MEMORIAL -- DiCEUENCE 17 '" u c: 0 so E ~ 0 ;; ;; ;; . "' w "" .,. / ill .,., liff" t , OC;-' N '" "" 0 1"- .. ~ 'I ~I x Je V"'A--- I '" , - . ;1e, 10c-/~, !Ict~, - 0 N N 41 . I d,? tIf~ r "" N '" IV:~ wM k~ '/,~ 1""511'7' J/~ . "" 0 ?' ~ c!u,U: ja,)J ,;,4:;- J ~ ~M-^7 1"- .. - '" - . #4 (Iv it 1I,J.wl ,hvr"-'~ fd fl?)J P2 W~ "' N N :> '" -' {;' / r J& 0 ' /ZI 1M {v I Vv' j11AV ,- ~ ro - c: I /wI f~n 0 (t4d - ro . ( ,- - ~ - .- )} " / " ~ 0 0. ft;1i-? . - ~ MIJ ;:;u,s (c.) '" ;3 I . - '" '" ~ - v'> '" c: - 0 .0 0 U 0 1"- - - CREATING A HEALTHIER FUTURE TOGHHEI . . February 16,2005 Dear; Mayor and Members of Council We are residents ofOro-Medonte Township. We reside or travel on the Mount St. Louis Road. We write to you today to express our concern of how poorly the Mt. St. Louis Rd. is maintained through the winter months. We are asking that thereft~more money in the budget for our area for our local roads so they can be better maintained in the winter months as well in the summer for repairs and upgrades. The above mentioned road is very heavily traveled and most times has not been plowed properly, sanded or salted. There are ruts of ice that build up between the l2'h and II th Line which make it nearly impossible for vehicles to steer properly which creates a very deadly hazard. We hope that this will act as proof that we are concerned and care about the roads we travel on daily with our families. We are tax payers and do not feel we should accept this any longer. If you have any questions or concerns please feel free to contact me on behalf of everyone at my home at 835-5953. /) . ,~. /, ,y:>-'^),.--/'------- ~-~-:\:::i_i \ /( ,,~{/~'iJ) \ '< ,/ //, ,,'/J "" /'" ,"-'" .. ~~. Q.'k.Matthews...J C/' ADDRESS: N.. t . 51 . I 'i ~ J (,\)/v'G/l, . -- . -", L , Lou (~ Rd - I,).:., d<1JiLu<<" ") ~ ":l C~d'~:f.M-&J. -C!~ 1 - ---- , March 18,2005 ~~ D. R. Wilson 2310 Highway 11S Shanty Bay, ON LOL 2LO 487-2716 Dear Oro-Medonte Council: When any sports team makes it to the OMHA Ontario championship finals it is a credit to all those who worked to achieve this distinction and to the Township itself. For years, the OMHA playdown games have been a time when many, especially seniors like me attend the games to give support and cheer on our local teams. For years, we had been able to rely on knowing when the games are scheduled by reading the large billboard sign on the arena. For years, the arena staff simply used their discretion to post the appropriate games. Coaches have been informed that the arena staff no longer have this discretion and can only act if directed by the Township Office. When contacting the Township Recreation Departmen, coaches have learned that Oro-Medonte now has a policy where it will not post any games including the OMHA finals. This has resulted in an arena that was once filled with fans to low attendance with a significant loss of revenue for Ora Minor Hockey. OMHA teams travelling across Ontario publicize the names of their communities and fulfill the role of ambassadors. Teams from Oro travelling to other centres are recognized by billboard signs on the host community's arena publicizing the games. Oro-Medonte needs to reciprocate in kind. Teams from Oro-Medonte have a strong long history of being outstanding ambassadors for our Township. The refusal to post the OMHA playdown games on the Arena Board appears inconsistent with Council inviting the winning teams for special recognition at a Council meeting. One wonders if Council as a whole is aware of the change in the once long standing tradition of posting the games on the arena sign board and has given due consideration the implications of this change? I request Oro-Medonte Council take measures to immediately rectify this situation. Sincerely. /!\ /je, .. ~/' '~-C<d~.t0~l Doug )fiIilson - \ \ TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE REPORT Dept. Report No. To: Prepared By: F .D. Report 2005 - 06 Committee of the Whole Lynn Burness, F.D. Secretarv Subject: Department: Council Oro-Medonte Fire and Fire Report for Month of Emergency Services C.ofW. January, 2005 Date: March 8, 2005 Motion # R.M. File #: Date: RolI#: DATE STATION TIME TYPE LOCATION DAMAGE Station #5 Chimney Overheat 1750 Line 13 North Janua ,1, 2005 Warminster 05:40:00 Station #6 Motor Vehicle Highway 400 @ Janua 2,2005 Moonstone 12: 18:05 Accident Line 6 North Station #2 Motor Vehicle Highway 11 NIB, Janua 2,2005 Hawkestone 14:04: 01 Roll Over Line 6 South Station #2 Alarm - No Fire, 110 Line 7 South Janua 3,2005 Hawkestone 01:07: 00 Nothin Found Station #2 Vehicle Fell On Line 15 North, at Janua 3,2005 Hawkestone 13: 20:00 Person, Fuel Leak Sa 'eant Mix Yard Station #4 Assist Station #2 Line 15 North, at Janua 3,2005 Ru b 13:20:00 Sar'eant Mix Yard Station #2 Carbon Monoxide 602 Lakeshore Road Janua 3,2005 Hawkestone 23:44:00 Call East Station #4 Medical Assist 19 Tamarack Drive Janua 4,2005 Ru b 18:22: 16 Call Station #5 Medical Assist 219 Medonte S.R. #2 Janua 5,2005 Warminster 12: 51: 18 Call F.D. Report 2005 - 06 DATE STATION TIME TYPE lOCATION DAMAGE Station #1 Medical Assist 16 Walnut Drive I January 6, 2005 Shanty Bav 12:07: 00 Call , Station #5 Alarm - No Fire 1000 Harvey Januarv 9, 2005 Warminster 16: 12:06 Accidental Alarm Settlement Road Station #1 Carbon Monoxide 69 Red Oak Januarv 12, 2005 Shantv Bav 02: 19: 00 Call Station #5 Multi Motor Highway 12 and Januarv 12, 2005 Warminster 18: 30: 00 Vehicle Accident Conder Drive Station #3 Multi Motor Highway 400 and January 12, 2005 Horseshoe 22:05: 00 Vehicle Accident HSVR Station #3 Fire in Wall, 2736 Line 3 North $ 10,000.00 L i Januarv 13, 2005 Horseshoe 13: 38: 50 Structure Fire $400,000.00 S Station #3 Multi Motor Highway 400 and Januarv 13, 2005 Horseshoe 21: 55: 00 Vehicle Accident Hiahwav 93 Station #4 Carbon Monoxide 4 Shelswell Cres. Januarv 13, 2005 Ruabv 23:35:00 Call Station #2 Ramara, Mutual Strawberry Island Januarv 14, 2005 Hawkestone 21:48: 00 Aid, Airboat i Station #5 Motor Vehicle Highway 12 and Old Januarv 14, 2005 Warminster 22: 10: 00 Accident, Ditch Coldwater Road Station #5 Motor Vehicle Highway 12 and I Januarv 15, 2005 Warminster 01:33:00 Extrication HSVR Station #5 Motor Vehicle Highway 12, near Januarv 15, 2005 Warminster 01: 30:00 Accident Warminster S.R. Station #5 Medical Assist Mt. St. Louis Rd. and Januarv 16, 2005 Warminster 12: 14: 51 Call Medonte Road 2 Station #5 Motor Vehicle Highway 12, East of Januarv 16, 2005 Warminster 00: 10: 00 Roll Over Warminster i Station #1 Motor Vehicle 1503 Ridge Road Januarv 16, 2005 Shanty Bav 03:28:22 Roll Over West Station #4 Medical Assist 829 Line 11 North Januarv 16, 2005 Ruabv 18: 07:00 Call Station #3 Conveyor Belt, 2065 Line 7 North $ 10,000.00 L i Januarv 17, 2005 Horseshoe 10:45: 00 On Fire $ .00 S Station #2 Smell of Smoke, Highway 11 and Line Januarv 18, 2005 Hawkestone 19:05:00 Nothina Found 15 Station #2 Motor Vehicle Highway 11 NIB @ January 19, 2005 Hawkestone 10:06:28 Roll Over Line 13 , Station #2 Motor Vehicle Highway 11 @ Line January 19, 2005 Hawkestone 11: 45: 00 Accident 9 Station #2 Motor Vehicle Highway 11, near , i Januarv 19, 2005 Hawkestone 15:50:34 Overheat Booth's Road , Station #5 Medical Assist 1 Lakeview Drive Januarv 19, 2005 Warminster 18: 55: 00 Call F.D. Report 2005.06 DATE STATION TIME TYPE LOCATION DAMAGE Station #5 Medical Assist 3771 Line 11 North I Januarv 21, 2005 Warminster 01:47: 00 Call Station #5 Chimney 1120 Mt. St. Louis I Januarv 21, 2005 Warminster 07:37:58 Overheat S.R Station #5 Motor Vehicle Highway 12, East of ! Januarv 22, 2005 Warminster 15: 13:00 Roll Over Prices Corners I Station #1 Overheat, Furnace 855 Ridge Road I Januarv 23, 2005 Shantv Bav 16:32:00 Malfunction, Smoke West Station #2 Medical Assist 2238 Lakeshore Road I Januarv 24, 2005 Hawkestone 14:03: 54 Call East Station #$ Motor Vehicle Highway 400 @ i Januarv 24, 2005 Moonstone 21:49: 59 Roll Over Line 3 Station #4 Overheated Hot 744 Old Barrie Road Januarv 24, 2005 Ruqbv 23:46: 00 Water Boiler East Station #$ Multi Motor Highway 400 and Januarv 25, 2005 Moonstone 09:52: 36 Vehicle Accident Line 4 Station #3 Carbon Monoxide 1933 Line 2 North Januarv 26, 2005 Horseshoe 19:45: 00 Call Station #3 Carbon Monoxide 3 Maple Ridge Road Januarv 27, 2005 Horseshoe 12: 15: 14 Call Station #2 Multi Motor Highway 11 at Line Januarv 27, 2005 Hawkestone 16:35: 00 Vehicle Accident 15 South Station #3 Alarm - No Fire Craighurst Ambulance Januarv 29, 2005 Horseshoe 15:08:41 (Sorinqwater Carn Buildinq Station #2 Burning 5287 Highway 11 Januarv 29, 2005 Hawkestone 11:44: 00 Complaint North Station #3 Carbon Monoxide 17 Sugarbush Road Januarv 30, 2005 Horseshoe 20:35:00 Call Station #5 Medical Assist 14 Cahiague Road Januarv 31, 2005 Warminster 10:35:00 Call Structure and Vehicle Fire Dollar Value Lost Dollar Value Saved $ 20,000.00 $ 400,000.00 Medical Calls 2005 2004 9 6 - Monthlv Fire Report for Januarv. 2005 Trainina Sessions Station #1 Shanty Bay 2 Station #3 Horseshoe 2 Station #2 Hawkestone 2 Station #4 Rugby 2 Station #5 Warminster 2 Station #6 Moonstone 2 Inspection Record for the Month (includina Fire Prevention I Public Education) Commercial Residential/Bed & Breakfast Industrial I Mercantile 3 Schools / Assembly I Church Woodstove 6 Daycare / Camps I Hall Tours 1 Comments or Recommendations bv Fire Chief and/or Deputv Fire Chief Extra trainina / Seminars and Events Attended Mutual Aid Meeting Meeting with Ontario Fire Marshal Office Trainer Facilitator Meeting DNR Meeting Meeting with Point to Point Communications, RE: Radio Frequency Change Over RespectfUlly submitted, "' /J, il"/\ cA.." ~/~ /' -- '-~_..-/ / Lynn Burness, Secretary, Fire and Emergency Services C.A.O. Comments: Date: C.A.O Dept. I; I@. i~rrj Head . V _I ! TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE REPORT Dept. Report No. To: Prepared By: FD - 2005 - 07 Committee of the Whole Joe Casey, Director of Fire & Emergency Services Subject: Department: Council Back-Up Emergency Fire and Emergency Generator for the Services C.ofW. Township of Oro- Date: March 11, 2005 Medonte Administration Building (EMO) Motion R.M. File #: # Date: Roll #: II BACKGROUND: I A project planning worksheet was completed for JEPP funding (joint emergency preparedness planning), applications, for items that would help enhance the capabilities of the existing Emergency Operations Centre (EOC) and an alternate EOC, to comply with the recommendations from the Emergency Measures of Ontario. It would also give the members of the Community Control Group the necessary tools to effectively, without interruption, manage a major emergency should one be declared. On November 24, 2004, report number FD - 2004 - 11 (Motion 17), was received and adopted. As a result of this report being adopted tenders were advertised in the Packet and Times and opened on Thursday March 3, 2005, witnessed by Mayor Neil Craig, CAO Jennifer Zieleniewski, Fire Chief Joe Casey, Chief Building Official Ron Kolbe and the Clerk Marilyn Pennycook was the recording secretary. - - 2- ~ ANALYSIS: , The results of the Tenders received, for this project, are as follows: CONTRACTOR QUOTE TOTAL G.S.T GRAND TOTAL WALLWIN ELECTRIC $ 56,303.40 G.S.T INCLUDED $ 56,303.40 MAZUR ELECTRICAL & MECHANICAL $ 46,434.00 $ 3,250.38 $ 49,684.38 CONTRACTING L TO. LIVE WIRE ELECTRICAL $ 57,492.53 G.S.T. INCLUDED $ 57,492.53 ~ RECOMMENDA TlON(S): I 1. THAT Report No. FD - 2005 - 07 be received and adopted. 2. THAT Council commit the necessary funds to commence this project by the deadline of March 31, 2005. 3. THAT the Tender be awarded to Mazur Electrical and Mechanical Contracting Ltd. for the total amount of $ 49,684.38 4. AND that the respective contractor is notified accordingly . - - 3- Respectfully submitted, Joe Casey, Fire qtj\ef oro-Medo1te FireJand E rgency Services C.A.O. COMMENTS: DATE: () ~Av jCfJ/\ r).JJ'-- J C.A.O. DEPT. HEAD -'~ ~f-of ORO~ ~ \ j,J ~'/----~--"..-'!t~~.. \De- I P.~( /-:,,':; , I=~O\ 00 , '" J r ,\ ~ '- ,,:_-_:\~~- ~ ,,'f{,,~, 'IItS~:V O;':?.:!;~';;;;;;:'>><< ' TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE REPORT Dept. Report No. TR2005-08 To: Committee of the Whole Prepared By: Paul Gravelle Subject: Treasurer's Department: Treasury Statement of remuneration Council C.ofW. Date: March 16, 2005 Motion # R.M. File #: Date: RolI#: II BACKGROUND: II S. 284 of the Municipal Act stipulates that the Treasurer shall in each year on or before March 31st provide to Council an itemized statement of remuneration and expenses paid in the previous year to each member of Council and each person, other than a member of Council, appointed by the municipality to serve as a member of any body, including a local board. II ANALYSIS: II Please find attached the Treasurer's statement of remuneration and expenses for the year 2004. II RECOMMENDATlON(S): II 1. THAT Report No. TR2005-08 be received and adopted. Respectfully submitted, p~ irYt~ Paul Gravelle Treasurer - COCOCOL()I'-CON N ~o)COI'-'<I"'<I"o) 0 O'<l"NOC'? 0) COO C'?CO 0 C'? CO 0 COCOOOC'?COC'? 0 ~r--f'-~~ I'- '<I" Oo:ic00o:i'<io:i r--: ..oc0No:iNOo:i C'? NcOcOr--:c0 0) 0 ...I COC0f'..<!)O)-c-(V') 0 I'-rol.()OOCO~ N 1'-0'<1"'<1"1'- '<I" 0 <C o. 0). ~ 1'-_ CO. 1'-. 1'-. CO -c-~~~~(D~q '<1". L()COI'-COI'- C'? N I- -c-"I:j"O'>O>COO>O '<I" NNNNN C'? C'? 0:: 0 C"?Nr-~-c-~N L() ~ ~ <C I- W -c-l!)c.oN~<OO) 0 ~o)COI'-'<I"'<I"O) 0 O'<l"NOC'? 0) >- w ~~~c.c>~~1'-: 0) COCOOOC'?COC'? 0 -c-I'-N~~ N W C) OCOOl'-l'-COo) o:i ..oc0No:iNO'<i CO ~c0~~cci I'- :t: o)COC'?'<I"O'<l"L() CO NC'?OL()L()C'?O) 0) -q-CO'C"""""<::t(J) CO I- <C 0). CO C'?'<1". L() C'?I'- N ~N ~N CO ~ C'? w 0:: ...I ~ ~~ I'- 0 :2: u.. en I'- C'? 0 C'? CO C'? N W ~~~~~ 0 '<I" en en C'?OO)C'?O ~ cO Z Z Nt'-'C""""CO-- I'- L() 0 COCO I'-CO I'- L() 0) W C'? Wa. i= I-X <C . Zw O~ 00 Ow Oz :2:cti W<C 0...1 :ij:z u<C 00 UW 0::- <C:2: 01- 0000000 0 00000 0 u..~ Z c>0c>c>c>c>c> 0 C>C>C>C>C> 0 Ow 0 t-N__ONC'0__ cO L()L()L()L()L() L() a.Z i=en '<I"COCOL()NN'<I" '<I" 1'-1'-1'-1'-1'- I'- L()'<I"CO'<l"L()C'?1'- I'- C'? -::> <Cw C'? :t::2: o::w enW I-u.. Zo:: !:Q $:u.. C) 00 W 1-1- 0:: Z 0000000 0 0000000 0 00000 0 w C)en OOONL()OO I'- 0000000 0 C>C>~C>C> L() It) . . . . . . . 00..0..0..0..00 0 :2: l!)l.{)l!)__<c-l{)O N 0 L()L()I'-OL() N ~W NNNCO'<l"NL() I'- L()L()I'-I'-I'-I'-L() L() NNC'?OI'- CO 0 W N I-W 'C""""COONN--t- C'? 'C""""'C""""~'C""""__-q-LO ~ L()L()COCOCO 0) I- r--:0'..o..o..or--:0' c0' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ to <C Wu.. NNNNN N W N ~ I- W '<I" ~ W .c: :2: I- " en I- ~ 0000000 0 I- ro en :;:; i:t:: 0000000 0 Z :2: ~ >- . . . . . . . W :2: L()L()COCOCOCOCO 0 <D W :2: ~ 0:: (j)f'..______-r-__ CO 0 ::> 0:: <C 1'-00)0)0)0)0) '<I" I- '" ::> ~~~-~~- en u ro ...I O<.D____'C""""'C""""'C"""" CO <D en <C N____'C""""'C""""'C""""'C"""" 0) ::> >- ~ f- <C en ""') 0:: W 0 0 "" 0:: <C en OJ > I- u.. > ;;: ~ :::J m 0 .s::: (/) 0 .2Q) (9 (J)(l) -12c o -oC <C ~.s::: :; Q) C -5, m 0 'cu W en I.... 0 C m 0 W(j)CCC,-CUW ro ..r:::.;::; ..r:::'+-+-, I- Q).- Q) >. Q) ;;: C C)>'~OCOC a.. ...IOJOJ'5:::J(/);;:C -..o..::.::::-I+-, Z s... (j) (j) . rn >> - .- ::1 CO 0 '- CO :J to- 1......0.- +-' "0 ..r:: ::J -.- I +-' UmI Im~O -~o<C.!!?Owo -1....-- ::1 .D ZO~<Ct::O '0 Zo >.G5.s:::2:()LL :2:()o:::mQ)D..-o" ~ .>2' C C' 2 () <D ::::> I.... .- Q.. - c ..r:: :2: -0 .s::: C'.- C ro 0== I.... C-::J"C+-, 0Q)CC0 >m -l~..cCDOQ) Q. Q) m m m m 0 :::J o Q) >..- m m = <D UZIOO:::D.."O::: U"~...I2:OO<C a.()~I-O:::2: Q. - 011'- W WOO:> .,j' 000 0 0 0:> to 0:> N ~"": """ qC'j~ N C'j~r--: lD N NNN 0:> .,j' (")0 ..,f N.,j'O I'- (").,j'o1 I'- cO """:c0~ tD 0 0:> to .,j' lDNtO (") 0:>0:>0 I'- N ct)0:>0:> .,j' 0 """ ..- (") lDWlD 1'-. I'- N 0 N. 1'-. 1.0. 1'-. """ C'I """ """ N ..- """"""""" 1.0 ~ UJ 011'- to WOO:> .,j' 000 0 0 >- ~"": ..- ON 01 N qC'j~ I'- 0:> UJ (")0 ..,f N..,ftD N 0:>1.01'- 0 I'- :I: (") """ .,j' ON(") W ONe') I'- 0:> I- ..- """ e') .,j' I'- .,j' 0:: 0 U- If) UJ If) Z UJ UJo. 1-:>( ZUJ 00 Oz UJ<( ~Z ~Q ~~ OUJ o.Z -::) :I::.IE If)UJ Zo:: ~U- 00 1-1- Z 00 0 000 0 000 0 0 0:><.00:> N UJ UJqq q 000 0 N.,j'N 0:> .,j' C'jC'jC'j <D l() OOtD tD tDoiN cO 0 tD <:> :.IE UJOo 0 ",,"e')"- <:> UJ 1-1.01.0 0 UJLOON I'- 1'-1.01'- 0 .,j' 0:>0:>0:> .,j' N (") UJ.,j'<.OLO 1.0 .,j' I'- e') I'- 1'-1.01'- ..- ~ 1-"""""" l- . I- . - . rt5 ~ """ ..- rx:"r'r~ 1.0 - ~ I- 0 "" :.IE ~ <.> 0. ~ 0 :.IE '" If) 0:: 2' a: u 0 ~ ;. :c( ~ ~ u '" \!2 >-~ ~ ..J ~ ~ :;J 0 <( '" ::) 0 UJO ro If) ..J:I: :I: Z '" If) 0 ~ :; ..JI- I- 0 I- <( If) <(::) ~ 8 '" \!2 0 :; <( ><( UJ Q) I- ro 0 <(z z 0:: ;> >- <( '" Q) C)O UJQ ~ !:: :J Z ~ <(- UJ-o C) ..J 0 0<D e:- If) ~.r. .S o~= O~.r. '5 ii1=0 _-0 <( Q) .;g u (1:1 u~o> '" _ ro '-' I- (1:1 ~ 0 ~~:JQ)c ~~~ :.IE3::J.r. a. If)en~ <(~2Q) 0.- :J _roo'-' ); 1f)<D<D UJ<Dc~ <(UJ:r:\:!~ If)UJro If)~:r:ro 0:::t:::JC) UJIf)~ o <D -0 UJ .- .- \=If).r.o UJc.c..J '" u.Qc u<D:r: z 0-_ .c ~z- ~ ~.cg.c '" u.Qc UJcc.Q o 0 ro 'Q) ::; <(o~ a. <D 0 0:: >- ro 0 <(o(1:l<D '" <(oen ..J_en zu!:tz!:t ..Juo... ..J.....,!:t..J ~ a. - ~"''o:t." ,~'~ Of Ollo_~t~" .. ~'\/------_._<1t{l'~ fit;> '-.__-,.~~(h'~, ,W= ., ~~ ,'0 - , - -I' %'"'" : ,.", \\ ""i& ~tt-I "- - '''^' i;. ~1,\~~,~li/~~!l TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE REPORT Dept. Report No. To: Committee of the Prepared By: ADM 2005-009 Whole Marilyn Pennycook Clerk Subject: Department: Administration Council Proposed Land Transfer and Exchange with C.ofW. Richard and Janet Date: Hennig, Part Lot 5, Conc. March 23, 2005 4 [P.I.N. 74055-0008 (Lt)] Motion and Part of the Original R.M. File #: # Road Allowance between L07 -014336 Lots 5 and 6, Conc. 4 Date: [P.I.N. 74055-0002 (Lt)] Roll #:4346-010-002- 16600 - 1304 Bass Lake Sideroad West II BACKGROUND: ~ Correspondence has been received from Klaus Jacoby, Barrister & Solicitor, on behalf of Mr. and Mrs. Richard Hennig who acquired Parts 1 and 3 on Plan 51 R-25502 (1304 Bass Lake Side road West). A sketch of the location of the above-noted property is attached [Attachment #1]. It was noted that: . Part 2, Plan 51 R-25502 forms part of the original road allowance between Lots 5 and 6, Concession 4; and . Part 3, Plan 51 R-25502 which is part of Mr. and Ms. Hennig's land is being occupied by the Township to accommodate the deviation in the original road allowance [Attachment #2]. In order to correct the matter, Mr. and Ms. Hennig have requested an exchange of lands between themselves and the Township. - II ANALYSIS: I~ Mr. Dino Astri, the surveyor who prepared Plan 51 R.25502 has confirmed that the northerly limit of Part 3 is completely fenced with access to the Hennig lands by way of brick gates. The Township would acquire everything to the south of that existing fence (Part 3,51 R-25502 identified as the Deviation Road on Attachment #2). A further Reference Plan is therefore not required. Further, Section 66 of the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c.25, as amended, provides that: "If, before January 1, 2003, a highway was opened on land in the place of all or part of an original road allowance and compensation was not paid for the land, the owner of the land appropriated for the highway or the successor in title to the owner is entitled to the following: (1) If that person owns the land abutting on the allowance, the owner is entitled to the soil and freehold of the original road allowance and to a conveyance of the original road allowance." It is therefore recommended that the land transfer and exchange with Richard and Janet Hennig proceed accordingly. As no compensation was received by the landowner for Part 3,51 R-25502, it is therefore recommended that the land be conveyed at no cost to the applicant other than those incurred by the Township for the exchange. II RECOMMENDATION (S): I~ 1. That Report No. ADM 2005-009 be received and adopted. 2. That Part 2, Plan 51 R.25502 being part of the original road allowance between Lots 5 and 6 is not required by the Municipality. 3. That the Township enter into a land exchange as follows: (a) From Richard and Janet Hennig to the Township: Part 3, Plan 51 R-25502 (b) From the Township to Richard and Janet Hennig: Part 2, Plan 51 R-25502 - 4. That staff be authorized to waive the requirements of, By. Law No. 2003-125, Being a By-law to Establish a Procedure governing the Sale of Land to proceed with the land exchange of Parts 2 and 3, Plan 51 R-25502. 5. That there be no compensation for land value to/from the Township in the exchange of lands. 6. That the applicant be responsible for all costs associated with the exchange. 7. And Further That the applicant be notified of Council's decision. Respectfully submitted, ! D II ~i,! r, ',', I] /1~+~, en-l Marilyn Pennycook U Clerk C.A.O. Comments: Date: j:5J iJ,.JJJv C.A.O. Dept. Head - Attachment #1 to Report No. ADM 2005-009 r-7'1,1"4i/' r\,\- ---, 0:DJ?~<'," u;;-_ }.,'\<;- "\' ~-<' ,\ ,-;' "~' " '. ~\ f' I \, ~'\ "\.;;.~' \;...!.-J.._L...... \~ ''\..-)~~, 1\'/" J.,,>; ,D":V \_~:r- _ ~/' ~ ':f- ! \" 't;'1/0.'* ")..Y _'" /- -:L..r--- (.-' '\.:1t,:"" , "\" ~ ;? ,! \/ _.-'/ ~-" v........ /'/ '~; ....... .. "\ ! ,\, / / '/%,' <', 'F ! '/ .-\' ./"...-' ~<{-Y i " r-1 // .,/' \, \, ./ ,./ $" , " " ../ ? r~~Ir---L_-_.... w"-"/ \ -<..../' /\ A"- (l... /- \-::/ .f- C d'~' , ........... /" ,-"" ^"'~ ;)''7/7'"' /";;'~<<' "''i/'\:;'4;:'" ~ ./ \ '<J.~ /..-*/, \, _ ...",- '\;", ,/- ", ,P'k\,: \, ./ .-,--.. '\ ':,' :::/ "--, //' \\ / . \. ... \ " '\ ,./ , / /.....~~ '"/ (' ,~, ~/ I ~..~';'" \. /(.:c.;,. I .~ V ~ I "",,4.,,0'" ,../ '~\\ I .$',:f::Jj.-'" -, \\~ ...../\ 1 \~/ '< I i \ ..< v ~ Subject Property Attacbment ~Mt~OO5-009 ~ Re,;>O;:t No. ."', \1 cD .~UIiI~ "0.1 ~Q ~ .15 \0 ~ ~ .::.J 'i i Q \1~ 0.. '! 1W a "i11 It> 04.1 !, \ 'is <(ct: O~ " i~ \0 " Q::':2 !..I J:. t.:> ~1 . ~ ;;i 1')- ' .- z. '-' ;.; ~O ct: S~ ~ u .' tf\ O.b\=C ~ ~-I~ ~ \-,-00<('-' -,0 c;2,~ 4.1 &. l'L~ ~ -..... ,IX> '> a 4- ~o. UJ 0 ~ .......... ....0 0.. -<: S. ,.:;) z i o"Z- - r" 4- ~ ~, L ( ':l 0 1 J:. 0\ ~ 0 c..a ....,- \(! ,1, ex:. ...- -' -~... o ~ """" . I) \ \ ,.' 0" ~,~~ ",0 0.. '2 ~ "," . ... .f .. ( ~ ~ ,~ ~ \ , Ii \ 1% \ , _,<:>"S'f7~",~ 11:<0' O'o_~ ",~\'~--'-'--'~~<".o\- I ~.%', -\ ~. : \ ~ ~., \l! ~/" "'J ,~~~; , TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE REPORT Dept. Report No. To: Committee of the Whole Prepared By: ADM 2005-019 Marilyn Pennycook, Clerk Subject: Department: Administration Council Draft Fees and Charges C.ofW. By-law Date: March 23, 2005 Motion # R.M. File #: Date: RolI#: II BACKGROUND: II The Municipal Act, 2001 provided authority to municipalities to pass by. laws imposing fees or charges for services rendered, as did the old Act. However, the new legislation enhances public accountability and prohibits the use of fees and charges to generate revenue. Fees cannot be unreasonably high or prohibitive and must be tied to the provision of a service. As well, the municipality must be able to demonstrate a reasonable connection between the cost of the service provided and the amount charged for the service. This requirement provides transparency in the process of implementing such charges. Municipalities must create and maintain a list of all services, activities and all properties that will be subject to fees and charges, and list the amount of each fee or charge. This list is required to be made available to the public. After considering the number of current Township by. laws which address fees and charges, it was determined that a consolidation of these by-laws would bring these by. laws within the scope of the new Municipal Act, and would also constitute a list which would be readily available to the public. The Draft By-law has been circulated to all Department Heads for comment and revised accordingly. II ANALYSIS: I The attached Draft By-law consolidates all fees and charges within the Township. The only exceptions are those fees which are imposed by statute (Le., fees charged under the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act). The consolidation also incorporates increases in fees and the inception of new fees. These changes to the original fees are marked by balloons in the by- law for ease of reference. Fees imposed by a municipality respecting waste, water, police or fire must be reviewed within a legislated time frame and the imposition of these types of fees requires notice to the public that the Township intends to deliberate such fees at a public meeting. ~ It is therefore recommended that the entire draft fees and charges by-law be brought forward to a public meeting after the required notice has been served. II RECOMMENDATIONS: II f\. --'1 1. THAT Report No. ADM2005-019 be received~ o-.M.-o~~ 2. THAT the Draft Fees and Charges By-law be brought forward to a public meeting. Respectfully submitted, ;1 ~2J. ,-_iI, ~ Marilyn Pennycook Clerk C.A.O. Comments: Date: I / rl(w.-. \ 1 O~ (;~~ C.A.O. J Dept. Head - 2. . '" ~./Vo~;JJ DRAFT ~ THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHtP OF ORO-MEDONTE e- BY-LAW NO. A By-taw of The Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte to provide for the imposition of fees or charges WHEREAS Part XII, Section 391 of lhe Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c. 25, as amended, permits a municipality to pass by-laws imposing fees or charges on any class of persons, for services or activities provided or done by or on behalf of it: for costs payable by it for services or activities provided or done by or on behalf of any other municipality or local board; and for the use of ils property including property under its control; AND WHEREAS Section 11 of lhe Municipal Act. 2001, S.O. 2001, c. 25, as amended. provides that a municipality may pass by-laws respecting water production, treatment and storage; AND WHEREAS Section 11 of the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c. 25, as amended, provides thai a municipality may pass by-laws respecting matlers relating to waste management; AND WHEREAS the Council of The Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte deems it necessary to levy waste management charges to finance the annual estimates for waste management for the year 2004; AND WHEREAS Section 11 of the Municipal Act, 2001, SO. 2001, c.25. as amended, provides thai a municipalily may pass by-laws respecting sewage treatment: AND WHEREAS The Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte operates and maintains communal tile beds hereinafter referred to as the "sewage works"; AND WHEREAS the Council of The Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte deems it necessary to impose a sewer service charge upon those lands that derive a benefit from the sewage works; AND WHEREAS Section 398 of the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c. 25, as amended, provides lhe Treasurer of a local municipalily may add charges imposed by the municipality under Part XII of the said Act to the tax roll tor the property to which the public utilily was supplied and collect them in the same manner as municipal taxes; AND WHEREAS Section 69 of the Planning Act, R.S.O., 1990, c.P.13, as amended, provides lhat a municipalily may establish a tariff of tees for the processing of applications: AND WHEREAS Section 50 of the Condominium Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.C.26, as amended, provides that a municipalily may establish a tariff of tees for the processing of applications; AND WHEREAS Seclion 7 of the Building Code Act, 1992, S.O. 1992, c.23, as amended, authorizes a municipal Council to pass by-laws concerning the issuance of permits and relaled matlers; AND WHEREAS Section 5(0.1) of the Fire Protection and Prevention Act, 1997, S.D. 1997, c.4, as amended, authorizes a municipality to establish, maintain and operate a fire department tor all or any part of the municipality. NOW THEREFORE the Council of The Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte enacts as follows: . DRAFT ~ 1. That this By-law be known as the "Fees and Charges By-law". 2. Thallhe following Schedules, attached herelo, form part of this By-law: Schedule A Administration Schedule B Building Schedule C Fire Schedule D Parks and Recreation Schedule E Planning Schedule F Public Works Schedule G Sewer Service Charges Schedule H Treasury Schedule I Waste Management Charges Schedule J Water Rates 3. Thai Appendix "1" attached hereto lisls services and fees imposed under separate by-laws, Acts, Onlario Regulations. 4. Any person desirous of using those services or property of the Township of Oro- Medonle described in Schedules "A" to and including "J" shall pay the fee set out opposite the description or name of the particular service or property, as shown in Schedules "A" to and including "J". 5. Despite lhe provision of Section 4, Councilor its delegated authority may, in its discretion upon application to ii, waive or reduce the fees set out in Schedules "A" to and including "J" for any person, on a one time or on a continuing basis. 6. All fees payable under this by-law shall be payable in advance of providing the service except for: a) emergency services; b) actions taken by lhe Township of Oro-Medonte to rectify failures or by-law infractions on the part of a resident; c) specific fees prescribed in Schedule "E" (Planning) 10 lhis by-law; in which case the fee payable will be in arrears and invoiced subsequent to the service or activity provided. 7. If for any reason fees owing under this by-law remain unpaid after 30 days, same shall bear interest at the rate of 1,25% per monlh until paid in full. In addition to any interest owing. each payment thai is not paid when due, shall bear an administrative penalty of $25.00. 8. Where a deposit is required under this by-law for services rendered by the Township, and aclual costs exceed the deposited amount, such costs shall be deemed to be fees owing under lhis by-law and Section 7 of this by-law shall pertain 10 such oulstanding costs. 9. Any fees that are owing to the Township of Oro-Medonte and that are unpaid are a debl to the Township of Oro-Medonte and, together with all interest and penalties accrued thereupon, may be collecled by the Township of Oro-Medonte by action or may be collected by the Township of Oro-Medonle on its behalf or may be collected in like manner as taxes. DRAFT \ ~5 \j) 10. Should any Section, subsection, clause, paragraph or provision of this By-law, including any part of the Schedules to this By-law, be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid. the same shall not affect the validity of the By- law as a whole or any part thereof, olher than the provision or part of lhe Schedule so declared to be invalid. 11. That By-laws No, 97-66, 98-84, 98-96, 98-102, 99-04, 99-70, 99.78, 2002-136, 2003-30, 2004-32, 2004-033, 2004-077 are hereby repealed in their enlirety. 12. Any other By-law or part thereof inconsistent with the provisions of this By-law is hereby repealed. 13. That this By-law shall take effect and come into force on the day of its final passing. Read a first and second time lhis day of ,2005. Read a third time and finally passed lhis day of 2005. THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE Mayor, J. Neil Craig Clerk, Marilyn Pennycook DRAFT ~ SCHEDULE "A" TO BY-LAW NO. ADMINISTRATION 1. Compliance Reports (subject to 3 day turnaround time) Building Information $50,Oq -f Comment [PI]: $:25.00 ~ Environmental $50,Oq Corinnent [P2]:previousl'ro? fee -,) Subdivision Informalion $50,Oq: - - - - - - - - - Conrrnent [P3]: $25.00 1 Zoning Information $50.00 , Comment [P4]: $25 00 I Oevelopment Charge/Lol Levy Information $20.kJd t~~~.~.~~J~!t:..~_l~:~.._ ....._._,.__._._._ .... ..."....J 2. Documents Fire and Emergency Services Master Plan $20.00 (Background Material) Planning Official Plan $53.50 Zoning By-law $42.80 Official Plan Amendmenls $45,00 Recreation Master Plan $40.00 2. History Association Books Note: All books are sold on behalf of the Oro.Medonte History Association. Prices are inclusive of GST. Bayview Memorial Park $1.50 Hills of Oro $3.00 Kith 'n Kin $37.00 { Comment [P6]: $16.05 ) Knox Presbyterian Church $3.21 Medonte A Township Remembered $37.00 (retail) $29.91 (wholesale) Monty Leigh Remembers $8.56 Oro African Church $15.00 (retail) $9.00 (wholesale) Recent Past $8.56 Slory of Oro $13.91 Visible Past $18.19 3. Line Fence Dispute Administration Fee $30.00/call 4. Livestock Claims Administralion Fee 151 claim in any calendar year $0.00 2nd or subsequent claim in any calendar year $60.00 Veterinarian's Report Twsp. Cost 5. Maps Planning 11"x17" $5.00 Oversize $10.00 Plotter $1 O,OOmnear foot ($5.00 minimum) DRAFT - Township Road Map $10,00 Schedule 'A' - Administration (cont'd) 6. Miscellaneous Assessment Intormation (floppy disk) $300.00 Encroachment Agreements - Applicalion Fee $700,00 - Annual Fee $60.00 Planning Circulalion Lisls $25.00 Photocopies - for all departments $,30/page Township Flag $57.00 Township Pins $3,00 7. Municipal Address Signage Sign Posls $ 7.00 Municipal Address Sign $15.00 DRAFT \s~ SCHEDULE "B" TO BY-LAW NO. BUILDING Per SQ. Ft. Per SQ. M. 1. Building 1.1 Group A & B (Assembly & Institutional Occupancies) a) New Construction 0.60 6.46 b) Renovation/Alleration 0.25 2.70 c) Interior Floor Layout 0.25 2.70 1.2 Group C (Residential Occupancies) a) New Construction and 0.73 7.85 Basement illinished 0.24 2.60 Attached Garage n/c n/c b) Renovation/Alleration 0.24 2,60 c) Garage-Attached 10 House 0.22 2.38 d) Garage-Detached from House FLAT RATE $200,00 (Maximum size 538 sq. ft.) e) Carport-Attached to House FLAT RATE $150.00 f) Accessory Building (Garden Shed and/or Storage Shed FLAT RATE $100.00 under 200 sq. ft.) h) Conversion of Attached Garage FLAT RATE $150.00 into Habitable Space j) Wood DecklPorchNeranda (Up 10 200 sq. ft.) FLAT RATE $100.00 (Over 200sq. ft.) FLAT RATE $200,00 k) Model Homes New Buildings, Additions including interior 0.58 6.30 I nferiar Alterations 0.24 2.60 1.3 Group D & E (Business and Mercantile Occupancies) a) New Construction 0.60 6.46 b) Restaurants 0.68 7.35 c) Renovalion/Alteration 0.29 3,15 1.4 a) Group F - (Industrial Occupancies) i) New Construction 0.39 4.20 ii) Renovation/Alteration 0.20 2.16 DRAFT - Schedule 'B' - Building (conl'd) 2. Demolition Permit Class "A" FLAT RATE $50.pq , -rc~;-~;'~t{P7j;"'-'"'""--"-'-'-' ..._m_... .._.m__''''_'''_'''__1 '..,'....'""" ~ Class "B" FLAT RATE $200.IJC\ -- { Comment [P8]:$JOO.OO i 3, Conditional Permit FLAT RATE $200.00 { COmment [P9]: previOus!yilO t1atrate I Plus full permit fee as calculated under Section 1 Addilional Permit Security may be required. Designated Struclure Same as Seclion 1. 4, Transfer Permit FLAT RATE $75,OQ t.~~.~.~r.~J,~~,~.I:_..~S.,9:~,",_ M....._.__...___....__..j 5. Provisional Occupancy Certificate FLAT RATE $25.00 6. Change of Use (no construction) FLAT RATE $75.0Q -j Comment [PU]i $5O.{)(J I 7. Reapplication FLAT RATE $75.IJO ~ment [P12]: $50.00 I 8. Plumbing Fixture - Unit $7.jsOc+___ _n t~~~!t~_~!l:_~'.~.,;__..'- .___ ..m.__.__...._ __...J (Individual in accordance with building code Table 7.4.9.3) $50.00 basic charge 9, Sewer Connection FLAT RATE $200.00 10. Temporary Structure: Portable Buildings (School Portable etc.) $300.00, _ _ _ _ _ _ __ {~~~~~~I~~~~i!~~~:~::~~~ mom :~:~.~~::-~~:~~~:~._:J Placement Permit (min. 6 months) $100.00 plus securily Tenls - up to 2,420 sq, It, (225 sq. m) FLA TE RATE $50.00 - over 2.420 sq. ft. (225 sq, m) FLATE RATE $100.00 11. Move Permit $100.00 plus security ..r Comment [PIS]: $75.00 1 , 12. Agricultural & Farm Buildings no Archilect/Engineer 0.20 2.,16 -L~",~.~,~~..t~!.~.~}~~_r.::.3L~!.~_~.~___~_____J Architect/Engineer 0.25 2.69 13. Provisional Occupancy Deposit FLAT RATE $100.00 Deposit fully refundable if no re-inspeclions were required or Building Permit was revised. 14. Inspection of wood burning appliance installation FLAT RATE $75.00, '(CrimmeRt [P17]: $50.00 J 15. Pool Enclosure Fence FLAT RATE $50.00 I Comment[P18]:noch.ange .,_,..J 16. Signs I Billboards FLAT RATE $100,00, . Comment [Pig]: $50:00 for sign~ $!OO.OO billooaros 17. L.L.B.O. inspections & letters for occupant loads FLAT RATE $75.00 .{ Comrnent[P2D]: $50.00 I ._ ..............mm.~."~ 18. Residential Care Home FLAT RATE $75.00 19. Re-Inspection Fee (Municipal staff only) FLAT RATE $50.00 For Contract slaff (Consultant) FLAT RATE $100.00 20, Lot Grading Deposit $2000.00 (refundable (on all new construction and/or renovations) upon satisfactory inspection minus any applicable charges) Note: Special Provisions see payment of fees Section 5. DRAFT ~ Schedule 'B' - Building (cont'd) Comment [P21J:NOCHANGES TO FEES i 21. Fees Under Part 8 - Ontario Building Code Sewage $ystem~ PREVIOUSLY APPROVED BY BY-LAW I Change of Use Permit $ 100,00 Consent $ 100.00/10t File Search Application $ 50.00 Holding Tank (Class 5) $ 250.00 Leaching pit (Class 2) $ 100.00 Minor Variance $ 100,OO/lot Per - Construction site plans $100.00 Reapplication $100.00 Sewage System Permit $350.00 Septic Bed Replacement $250.00 Septic Tank Replacement $100.00 Severance Application Review $100.00/101 Site Plan $100.00/101 Special Inspection $100.00 Subdivision $100.00/101 Zoning Amendment $100.00 NOTE: Where construction has been commenced for any reason on a building prior 10 the issuance of a permit. there shall be an additional inspection fee equal 10 a sum of money equivalent to 25% of the normal permit fee for such work, or $ 500.00 whichever is greater. Where demolition has, for any reason commenced on a building prior to the issuance of a permil therefore, there shall be an additional inspection fee of $ 200.00. DRAFT - \ SCHEDULE "C" TO BY-LAW NO. FIRE . -{ Comment~P22]: NEW FEE STRUCTURE 1 Request for Fire Report $50.00 Residential Request for Information (a) Mortgage Clearance Letter $50,00 (b) Change of Ownership $50,00 Non-Residential Inspection Day Care, Nursery $75,00 Group Homes, Rooming Houses $75.00 Holels $150,00 Inspection of Wood Burning Appliance Installations $75,00 e.g. requested by eilher the home owner or the home owners insurance company (not including inspections resulting from building permit applications), Includes 2 visits Request Inspection of Premises or Building (not including inspections resulling from building permit applications) (a) under 20,000 sq. fi. $75.00 (b) over 20,000 sq, fi. $100.00 Inspeclions Required by L.L.B.O, $75.00 e.g, Inspection of public hall facililies that are requested by owner, etc. Fireworks Inspections and Approvals $75.00 e.g, Inspection of the site from which fireworks will be and have been igniled or inspection of a fireworks storage site, if located within Oro-Medonte Apparatus Stand-by $150,00/hour e,g. Use of Fire Department apparatus tor sland-by fire protection during shows, exhibition, demonstrations, etc. False Alarms - Aulomatic alarm Systems/Detectors FLAT FEE $450.00 After 3 per 12 Month Period: e,g. non notification to work on system, poor maintenance Elevator Calls - After First Call $150.00 Response to Open Air Fire Deemed Out at Control MTO RATES/HR. (where resident is not in attendance or is unwilling or unable 10 adequalely extinguish the fire) DRAFT -, SCHEDULE "D" TO BY-LAW NO. PARKS AND 'RECREATION ' Coinment [P23]: NO CHANGE IN FEES I FROM PREViOOSL Y ADOPTED COUNCIL 1. ICE RENTALS ~~~~_..'."._m..___~___,..__."._.__ ..m._'._.________.__ .J Prime Time (5:00 p.m. to Close & Weekends) $114.00/hour Non-Prime Time (before 5:00 p.m. Mon. to Fri.) $68.00/hour Minor Hockey I AAA IceMen I Figure Skating $83,OO/hour 2. NON-ICE RENTALS (Arena Floor Space) Adult $49.00lhour Minor $38.00/hour Floor $545.00/day 3. PUBLIC SKATING Adults $2.00 (On admission (pay at the door) - no permit required) Youlh $1.00 (On admission (pay at the door) - no permit required) Seniors $0.00 Pre-School $0.00 4. BANQUET HALL RENTALS Dance $290.00/day Meetings $25.00/hour Tournaments $164.00/day 5. BALL DIAMOND RENTALS Adult wilh Lights $26.00/hour Adull $13,00 I hour Minor with Lights $22.00 I hour Minor $9.00 I hour 6. PARKS AND PAVILLlONS Large Pavillion $52.00/day (Hydro - accommodates up to 200 persons) Small Pavillion (accommodales up 10100 - 150 persons $39.00/day 7. FACILITIES Old Town Hall $25.00/hour $107.00/full day Ian Beard Community Complex Room $12.00/hour 8. ADVERTISING Arena: Large Board $218.00 Olympia - Front Panel $273.00 - Side Panel $436.00 Note: All fees and charges are inclusive of tax. DRAFT - SCHEDULE "E" TO BY-LAW NO. PLANNING COmment (P24J: NO CHANGE IN FEES j FROM PREVJOUSL Y ADOPTED BY .LA W 1. PRE.CONSUL T A TION APPLICATION 1.1 Amendment to the Official Plan (a) Non Refundable Application Fee $500.00 (b) Refundabie Deposit against expenses and actual costs $500.00 1.2 Amendment to the Zoning By-law (a) Non Refundable Application fee $500.00 (b) Refundable deposil against expenses and aclual costs $500,00 1.3 Plan of Subdivision (a) Non Refundable Application Fee- 0) Less than or equal to 100 iots $750.00 (ii) Greater than 100 lots but less than 200 lots $1000.00 (Iii) Greater than or equal to 200 lots $1250.00 (b) Refundable Deposit againsl expenses and actual costs $2500,00 2. FORMAL DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION 2.1 Amendment to the Official Plan (a) Non Refundable Applicalion Fee $1250.00 (b) Refundable Deposit against expenses and actual costs $1200.00 If pre-consultation application was submitted 10 the municipality, the tees shall be reduced 10 the following: (c) Non Refundable Application Fee $500.00 (d) Refundable Deposit against expenses and aclual costs $700.00 2.2 Amendment to the Zoning By-law, Amendment to the Zoning By.law as a Condition of Provisional Consent in the Shoreline Designation as set out in the Official Plan, and Temporary Use By-laws (a) Non Refundable Applicalion fee $1250.00 (b) Refundable deposit against expenses and actual costs $1200.00 If pre-consultalion application was submitted 10 the municipality, the fees shall be reduced to the following: (c) Non Refundable Application Fee $500.00 (d) Refundable Deposil against expenses and acluai cosls $700.00 2.3 Amendment to the Zoning By-law as a Condition of Provisional Consent in all Designations in the Official Plan, except the Shoreline Designation (a) Non Refundable Application Fee $ 600.00 (b) Refundable Deposit against expenses and actual costs $1200.00 DRAFT ~ ". n "( - ,-; ; Schedule 'E' - Planning (cont'd) 2.4 Amendment to the Zoning By-law for a "Bed and Breakfast Establishment" in all Designations in the Official Plan, except the Shoreline Designation (a) Non Refundable Application Fee $600.00 2,5 Plan of Subdivision (a) Non Refundable Applicalion Fee - (i) Less lhan or equall to 100 lots $3000,00 (ii) Grealer than 100 lols but less than 200 lots $3250,00 (iii) Greater than or equal to 200 lols $3500,00 (b) Refundable Deposit against expenses and actual costs $5500,00 If pre-consullation application was submilted 10 the municipality, the fees shall be reduced to the following: (c) Non Refundable Application Fee - (i) Less than or equal to 100 lots $2000.00 (Ii) Greater than 100 lots but less than 200 lots $2000,00 (Hi) Greater than or equal to 200 lots $2000,00 (d) Refundable Deposit against expenses and actual costs $3000,00 2.6 Site Plan Approval (a) Non Refundable Application Fee (i) For Site Plan Improvements with an estimated $250.00 value of under $ 50,000.00 (Ii) For Site Plan Improvemenl with an estimated $500.00 value of over $ 50,000.00 (b) Refundable Deposit against expenses and actual costs (i) For Site Plan Improvements with an estimated $1000.00 value of under $ 50,000.00 (ii) For Site Plan Improvements with an estimated $5000.00 value of over $ 50,000,00 2,7 Site Plan Revision (a) Non Refundable Application Fee $100.00 (b) Refundable Deposit againsl expenses and actual costs $200.00 2.8 Provisional Consent (a) Application Fee for a "timeshare establishment" $700.00 as defined in By-law 97-95 (b) Refundable deposit against expenses and actual costs $1000,00 of processing application for Provisional Consent involving a "timeshare establishment" (c) Application fee for all other Provisional Consenl $700,00 applications DRAFT ~ \ - \ Schedule 'E' - Planning (cont'd) 2,9 Minor Variance (a) Non Refundable Application fee $500.00 2.10 Amendment to Provisional Consent or Minor Variance (a) Administralion fee on an application which, $250,00 due to amendment has to be recirculated 2.11 Site Plan Agreement and removal of Holding Provision on lands which do not front on an assumed public street that is maintained year-round by the Municipality (a) Non Refundable Combined Application fee $250.00 2.12 Removal of Holding Symbol except lands which do not front on an assumed public street that is maintained year-round by the Municipality (a) Non Refundable Application Fee $250.00 (b) Refundable Deposil $1000,00 2.13 Lots to be Deemed (on Plans of Subdivision) (a) Preparation of By-law and subsequent registration on title $75.00 3. EXPENSES AND ACTUAL COSTS Expenses incurred by staff (such as mileage. poslage, photocopying, courier costs, and site inspection fees for sile plan control) associated wllh a projecl and actual costs incurred for such items as advertising, consulting (planning, Engineering, and other) and legal will be charged directly to the applicant and deducted from the refundable deposit The applicant is required to replenish the refundable deposit, to its full amount, when the expenses and actual costs are submilted by the Township (see Section 4.2)," 3,1 Any person making appllcalion to the Ontario Municipal Board shall pay the applicable fees outlined by the Ontario Municipal Board and/or the Planning Act, as amended. All cheques for such applications are to be made payable to the Minister of Finance. 3.2 The applicant shall pay all costs associated wilh a planning development application including Ontario Municipal Board Hearing costs and appeal fees. 3.3 Such costs as they relate to land subject to lhe Township of Oro's Official Plan Amendment No. 37 and Official Plan Amendment No. 39, include the proportionate costs of the approval of Official Pian Amendment No, 37 and Official Plan Amendment No, 39, for those lands which have not contribuled 10 the Township, in accordance with the Official Plan Amendment No, 37, Cost Recovery Agreement. daled January 1993 and the Official Plan Amendment No. 39. Cost Recovery Agreemenl. dated June 1994, DRAFT Schedule 'E' - Planning (cont'd) 4. PAYMENT OF FEES 4.1 Total fee is payable upon receipt of completed application form and prior to formal presentalion to the Planning Advisory Committee, Committee of Adjustmenl, Council, or the Site Plan Control Committee. 4.2 As expenses and actual costs are incurred on behalf of the application, they will be submitted 10 the applicant for reimbursemenl so that the inilial refundable deposit will be replenished to enable lhe Township to pay further costs as they are incurred, In the event that the applicant does not maintain the application fee and applicable deposits with the Treasury Department then the application will be considered not complete with respecl to the payment of fees under lhe Planning Acl 4,3 Application fees are non-refundable and are applicable on a per lot basis, DRAFT I <-: - \ SCHEDULE "F" TO BY-LAW NO. PUBLIC WORKS 1. Additional Road Signage Requested by Township Cost Property Owner (e.g, "Hidden Oriveway") (Posl, Sign, Hardware & Labour) 2. Blue Boxes $6.00: -C~~~~~~JP25]: ~~ '""__.._"'.. J 3. Kitchen Composters $6.'00: t~~.~~.~~._~_~"~~.~~_,~-"~~.m. ,..! 4. Moving Permit (Oversize Equipment or Machinery) $20.00 5. Tile Drainage Inspections $100.00 6, Township Engineering Standards $40.00 7. Entrance Permit Fee $50,Od r......'.,...."._'_....".....,.. J - - - - ~ - - - - ~- - _ Comment [P27]: $35.00 DRAFT f' , SCHEDULE 'G' TO BY-LAW NO. TREASURY Returned Cheque $20.00 Tax Certificales $25.00 DRAFT SCHEDULE 'H' TO BY-LAW NO. SEWER . Comment (P28]: No CHANGES FROM RATES APPROVED BY COUNCIL BY BY.LAW 1, An annual sewer service charge of $170.00 per unit shall be imposed upon those lands more particularly described In Part 8 of this Schedule. The said charge will be comprised of the following components: Operating, repair and maintenance $ 50.00 Capital $120.00 2, An annual sewer service charge of $315,00 per unit shall be imposed upon those lands more particularly described in Part 9 of this Schedule. The said charge will be comprised of the following components: Operating, repair and maintenance $ 25.00 Capital $290.00 3, The Treasurer shall, for each calendar quarter, issue bills to each unit based on the applicable sewer service charges, Bills shall be due and payable not less than twenty one (21) days from the date of mailing, 4, Sewage bill payments shall be payable to The Corporation of the Township of Oro- Medonte and may be paid during office hours in person or by mail at the Oro. Medonte Administration Office. 148 Line 7 South, Box 100, Oro, Ontario LOL 2XO, or at most financial institutions. Payments made at a financial institution shall be deemed to be paid on the date shown by the T eller's stamp on the bill stub. The Township shall not be responsible for any applicable service charge payable to the bank. Cheques only can be dropped al the drop boxes located at the Adminislration Office and Moonstone Fire Hall. 5. The Treasurer shall impose a ten (10) percent late charge on all unpaid accounts on the day after lhe due date. 6. If an account remains unpaid, the municipality may coHect amounts payable pursuant to Section 398 of the Municipal Act, 2001, c.25, as amended. 7. In the evenl that any owner of lands not described in seclions 8 or 9 (the 'property owner") wishes to have the sewage works extended so as to service those additional lands, the following provisions shall apply: (a) For the purposes of this paragraph, the lerm "municipal engineer" shall mean any engineer employed by the municipality or any independent engineer appointed by the municipality from time to time as applicable; (b) The extension ot the sewage works shall firsl be approved by the Council of lhe municipalily upon application of the property owner, provided that Council shall have the right to determine, in its sole discretion, whether there is sufficient capacity in the sewage works to service the proposed extension; (c) All engineering drawings relating to the proposed extension must be prepared by a Consulting Engineer retained by the property owner, at the property owner's sole COSI. Such engineering drawings are subject to the approval of the Municipal Engineer; (d) The property owner shall execute an Agreement with the municipaliiy pursuant to which the property owner shall agree to be responsible for all engineering, legal and related fees incurred by the municipality as the resull of the request for proposed extension of the sewage works by the property owner; DRAFT Schedule 'H' - Sewer (cont'd) \.ox- (e) The Agreement between the property owner and lhe municipality shall also require the property owner 10 pay the tolal capital cost of the proposed extension, the municipality's costs as set out in subparagraph (d) above, togelher with a further sewage service charge in an amount to be determined by by-law of Council, prior to the commencement of any work. 8. LEGAL DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT ROLL NUMBER Tile Field #1 PLAN M-11 LOT 76 434602001005912 PLAN M-11 LOT 77 434602001005913 PLAN M-11 LOT 78 434602001005914 PLAN M-11 LOT 79 434602001005915 PLAN M-11 LOT 81 434602001005917 Tile Field #2 PLAN M-11 LOT 83 434602001005919 PLAN M-11 LOT 84 4346 020 010 05920 PLAN M-11 LOT 86 4346 020 010 05922 PLAN M.11 LOT 88 4346 020 010 05924 PLAN M-11 LOT 89 4346 020 010 05925 PLAN M-11 LOT 90 4346 020 010 05926 Tile Field #3 PLAN M.10 LOT 2 4346 020 010 05504 PLAN M-10 LOT 61 4346 020 010 05563 Tile Field #4 PLAN M-10 LOT 15 434602001005517 PLAN M-10 LOT 18 4346 020 010 05520 PLAN M-10 LOT 19 434602001005521 PLAN M-10 LOT 21 4346 020 010 05523 PLAN M-10 LOT 22 4346 020 010 05524 PLAN M-10 LOT 30 4346 020 010 05532 PLAN M-10 LOT 31 4346 020 01 0 05533 PLAN M-10 LOT 34 4346 020 01 0 05536 PLAN M-10 LOT 38 4346 020 010 05540 PLAN M-10 LOT 39 4346 020 01 0 05541 PLAN M-10 LOT 41 4346 020 010 05543 Tile Field #5 PLAN M-10 LOT 6 4346 020 010 05508 PLAN M-10 LOT 7 4346 020 010 05509 PLAN M-10 LOT 8 434602001005510 PLAN M-10 LOT 9 434602001005511 PLAN M-10 LOT 11 434602001005513 PLAN M.10 LOT 13 434602001005515 PLAN M-10 LOT 42 4346 020 01 0 05544 PLAN M-10 LOT 43 4346 020 01 0 05545 PLAN M-10 LOT 44 4346 020 010 05546 PLAN M-1 0 LOT 45 4346 020 01 0 05547 PLAN M-10 LOT 48 4346 020 01 0 05550 PLAN M-10 LOT 49 4346 020 010 05551 PLAN M.10 LOT 51 4346 020 010 05553 PLAN M-10 LOT 52 4346 020 010 05554 PLAN M-10 LOT 53 4346 020 010 05555 PLAN M-10 LOT 54 4346 020 010 05556 PLAN M-10 LOT 57 4346 020 010 05559 PLAN M-10 LOT 58 4346 020 010 05560 DRAFT ~ Schedule 'H' - Sewer (cont'd) Section 8. (cont'd) Tile Field #6 PLAN 1531 LOT 1 4346 020 010 00600 PLAN 1531 LOT 2 4346 020 010 00700 PLAN 1531 LOT 3 4346 020 010 00800 PLAN 1531 LOT 4 4346 020 010 00900 PLAN 1531 LOT 8 434602001001300 PLAN 1531 LOT 9 434602001001301 PLAN 1531 LOT 10 434602001001400 PLAN 1531 LOT 11 434602001001500 PLAN 1531 LOT 12 434602001001600 PLAN 1531 LOT 13 434602001001700 PLAN 1531 LOT 14 434602001001800 PLAN 1531 LOT 15 434602001001900 PLAN 1531 LOT 16 4346 020 01 0 02000 PLAN 1531 LOT 17 434602001002100 PLAN 1531 LOT 18 4346 020 01 0 02200 PLAN 1531 LOT 19 4346 020 010 02300 PLAN 1531 LOT 20 4346 020 010 02400 PLAN 1531 LOT 21 4346 020 010 02500 PLAN 1531 LOT 22 4346 020 010 02600 PLAN 1531 LOT 23 4346 020 010 02700 PLAN 1531 LOT 24 4346 020 010 02800 PLAN 1531 LOT 25 4346 020 010 02900 PLAN 1531 LOT 26 4346 020 010 03000 PLAN 1531 LOT 27 434602001003100 PLAN 1531 LOT 28 4346 020 010 03200 PLAN 1531 LOT 50 4346 020 010 05400 9. LEGAL DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT ROLL NUMBER PLAN 1587 LOT 15 434601000212300 PLAN 1587 LOT 16 434601000212400 PLAN 1587 LOT 17 434601000212500 PLAN 1587 LOT 18 434601000212600 PLAN 1587 LOT 19 434601000212700 PLAN 1587 LOT 20 434601000212800 PLAN 1587 LOT 21 4346 010 002 12900 PLAN 1587 LOT 22 4346 010 002 13000 PLAN 1587 LOT 23 434601000213100 PLAN 1587 LOT 24 4346 010 002 13200 PLAN 1587 LOT 25 434601000213300 PLAN 1587 LOT 26 4346 010 002 13400 PLAN 1587 LOT 27 4346 010 002 13500 PLAN 1587 LOT 28 434601000213600 PLAN 1587 LOT 29 4346 010 002 13700 PLAN 1587 LOT 30 434601000213800 DRAFT SCHEDULE 'I' TO BY-LAW NO. ~ WASTE MANAGEMENT 1. The following wasfe management charges shall be levied on a flat rate basis per user: Residential $120.00 Commercial-garbage collection. disposal & recycling $120.00 Commercial - recycling only $ 35.00 2. Waste management charges shall be added to the annual tax levy of each applicable property and be due and payable in the same manner and at the same time as the final tax bill. 3. Interest and penalty charges shall be applied in lhe same manner and at the same time as applicable to non-payment of installments of the final lax bill. DRAFT - SCHEDULE 'J' TO BY-LAW NO. WATER Comment [P29J: NO CHANGE FROM RATES. J APPROVED BY COUNCIL BY BY ~LA W 1. DEFINITIONS For the purpose of this Schedule, 1.1, "Municipal Water Area" shall mean a subdivision within The Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte, 1.2, "Municipal Water Systems" shall include all water works established within the present Township of Oro-Medonte, and shall further Include any present or fulure extensions to the water works under any Act or under an agreement between the Township or its predecessors, bul shall not include any private waler works which have not been acquired, established, maintained or operated by the Township or its predecessors; 1.3. "Owner" shall mean lhe assessed owner(s) as Identified on the Assessment Roll for taxation purposes during the current year, as amended. 1.4, "Treasurer" shall mean the Treasurer of The Corporation of the Township of Oro- Medonte. 1.5, "Unit" shall mean an assessed or assessable unit within a residential, commercial or Industrial building, and shall Include an apartment located wilhin a single family dwelling which Is serviced by lhe Township Waler System, as permitted under the applicable Zoning By-law. 1.6. ''Water Works" means any works for the collection, production, treatment, storage, supply and distribution of water, or any part of such works. but does not include plumbing or other works to which lhe Ontario Building Code Acl and Its regulations apply. 2. WATER CHARGES, BILLING AND COLLECTION 2,1. As soon as the water connection Installation is approved by the Township Inspector, he shall forthwilh turn the water on for owner. The owner will then be charged allhe appropriate water rate, as per Schedule 'J'. 2.2. At the end of September each year, the duly authorized employee shall read, or cause to be read, all meters connected to the Municipal Water System to determine the amount of water used during the year. 2.3. The Treasurer shall calculate water charges to be assessed against each unit in a Municipal Water Area, in accordance with the minimum quarterly charge and rates per cubic meter as set out in Schedule 'J'. 2.4. The Treasurer shall, for each calendar quarter, Issue bills to each unit based on lhe applicable water charges. Water bills shall be due and payable not less that lwenly.one (21) days from the date of mailing. 2.5. Water payments shall be payable to The Corporation of the Township of Oro. Medonte and may be paid during office hours in person or by mail at the Oro. Medonte Administration Office, 148 Line 7 South, Box 100, Oro, On LOL 2XO, or at most financial institutions. Water payments made at a financial institution shall deemed to be paid on the date shown by the Teller's stamp on the bill stub. The Township shall not be responsible for any applicable service charge payable to lhe bank, Cheques only can be dropped at the drop boxes located at the Administration Office and Moonstone Fire Hall. . DRAFT Schedule 'J' - Water (cont'd) 2.6. The Treasurer shall impose a ten (10) percent lale charge on all unpaid accounts on the day alier the due date. 2.7. If an account remains unpaid, the Township may collect amounls payable pursuant to Section 398 of the Municipal Act, 2001, c. 25, as amended, WATER RATES: METERED: RESIDENnALORCOMMERC~L SHANTY BAY. M-66, M-71, M-696 Based on twelve (12) month period $575.00/Unit for twelve (12) Months Minimum Rate Up to 365 Cubic Meters Based on a fhree (3) monlh period Minimum Rate Up to 90 Cubic Meters $143.75/Unit for three (3) Months HARBOURWOOD. M-118 Based on twelve (12) monlh period $575.00/Unit for twelve (12) Monfhs Minimum Rate Up to 365 Cubic Meters Based on a lhree (3) month period Minimum Rate Up to 90 Cubic Meters $143,75/Unit for three (3) Months SUGAR BUSH - M.8, M-9, M-30, M-31, M.367, M-368 Based on twelve (12) monlh period $575.00/Unit for lwelve (12) Months Minimum Rate Up to 365 Cubic Meiers Based on a fhree (3) month period Minimum Rate Up to 90 Cubic Meiers $143,75/Unit for three (3) Months CEDARBROOK - M-157 Based on twelve (12) month period $600.00/Unit for twelve (12) Monlhs Minimum Rate Up to 365 Cubic Meters Based on a three (3) month period Minimum Rate Up to 90 Cubic Meiers $150.00/Unit tor fhree (3) Months DRAFT Schedule 'J' - Water (conl'd) CANTERBURY - M-343 Based on lwelve (12) month period $600,OO/Unit for twelve (12) Months Minimum Rate Up to 365 Cubic Meters Based on a three (3) month period Minimum Rate Up to 90 Cubic Meters $150,OO/Unit for three (3) Months MAPLEWOOD Based on twelve (12) month period $575.00/Unit for twelve (12) Months Minimum Rate Up to 365 Cubic Meters Based on a three (3) month period Minimum Rate Up to 90 Cubic Meters $143.75/Unil for three (3) Monlhs HORSESHOE HIGHLANDS - M-391, M-447. M-456 ZONE II Based on twelve (12) month period $575,OO/Unit for twelve (12) Months Minimum Rate Up to 365 Cubic Meters Based on a three (3) month period Minimum Rate Up to 90 Cubic Meters $143.75/Unit for three (3) Months CRAIGHURST - M-510 Based on twelve (12) month period $575,OO/Unit for twelve (12) Months Minimum Rate Up 10 365 Cubic Meters Based on a three (3) month period Minimum Rate Up to 90 Cubic Meters $143.75/Unit for three (3) Months WARMINSTER - 309, M-104, M-92 Based on twelve (12) month period Minimum Rate Up to 365 Cubic Meters $575,OO/Unit for twelve (12) Months Based on a three (3) month period Minimum Rate Up to 90 Cubic Meters $143.75/Unit for three (3) Monlh Period . DRAFT Schedule 'J' - Water (cont'd) SURCHARGE BASED ON TWELVE (12) MONTH PERIOD FOR ALL METERED SYSTEMS EXCEPT CANTERBURY & CEDARBROOK 366-545 Cubic Meters $1.81ICubic Meter 546 + Cubic Meters $1.97ICubic Meter SURCHARGE BASED ON TWELVE (12) MONTH PERIOD FOR CANTERBURY & CEDARBROOK 366-545 Cubic Meters $1.89ICubic Meter 546 + Cubic Meters $2.05ICubic Meter FLAT RATE: REStDENTtAL MEDONTE HILLS. 1650, M-29, M-174 Based on twelve (12) month period Flat Rate $575.00IUnit for twelve (12) Months Based on three (3) month period Flat Rate $143.75IUnit for three (3) Month Period ROBINCREST - M-123, M-101, BACHL Y, MOONSTONE PER SCHEDULE "A" BY-LAW 2002-132 Based on twelve (12) monlh period Flat Rate $575.00IUnit for lwelve (12) Months Based on three (3) month period Flat Rate $143.75IUnit for three (3) Month Period SCHOOLS Flat Rate $ 18,OOlClassroomIMonth for twelve (12) Months HORSESHOE - ORO 1587 Based on lwelve (12) month period Flat Rale $575,OOIUnit for twelve (12) Months Based on three (3) month period Flat Rate $143.75IUnit for three (3) Month Period HORSESHOE - Medonte 1531, M-10, M-11, M-23 Flat Rate $575.00IUnit for twelve (12) Months Based on three (3) month period Flat Rate $143.75IUnit for three (3) Month Period PINE RIDGE SKI CLUB Flat Rate (6 unils) $3,450.00 for twelve (12) Months Flat Rate Commercial $ 862.50 for three (3) Month Period . DRAFT .~ Schedule 'J' - Water (cont'd) MISCEllANEOUS FEES: CONNECTION FEE INSPECTION $200,00 DISCONNECTION AND RECONNECTION CHARGE $ 50.00 Each . , DRAFT \t - Appendix "1" to By-law No. Fees and Charges imposed under Separate By-law/ActJOntario Regulation Deveiopmenl Charges Developmenl Charges Act, 1997, S.O. 1997, c.27 Freedom of Information Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.F.31, as amended Ontario Regulation 460, amended to O.Reg. 421/04 Fees are prescribed by the Acl ~' 5' :E -1 -1 'Z -1 tI1 -1 ("') ("') -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 0> ~::;< ~;:; -1 S' S' -1 ~ 8 ("') , t:lt\jOO(tlO;O~'::+'OOOOOO :::r<~ <fJ1:::r U)(DO PJ t:I:::r't:: ,,' '" :;: :;: :;: :;: 0.. :;: '< '< :;: :;: :;: ~ :;: :;: uo'::: u;" 0' _. '" '" cr' cr' :::to '" 0> ::;;";;; :::::: ::: ""::: 0 0 ::: ::: ::: :3 ::: ::: ::1' 'I 0 " <g cr' ~::: '" 0 ::;- ::: :::..,"^' 0 t/) .....:j t;I.: 0 VJ ~ ~ t:n r..n 0 0 r:n UJ (i) ~ <:: C __ _. () ::: c: ~ 0 ~ :;::r'(D::T'-t::r' ::r::r :::::r::r ""1a-~ ..~:::..: __- n' VJ ..., -, r> _. 0.. -, tI1 0 -."". ..., ..., -'''''' ::: = s::: 0.. ::1' eo 0 .., - - (1) tI1 ("') '" ::: '" :;: '" 0> ., '" IU ." i$: '" IU '" -, 0 - 0.. _, r>:::::: - _. VJ ~ 0 0 S 0 (tI 0 ~ = 0 0 ~ ..... 0 0 g 0:: ::E ~ _ E ~ {JQ~. (tJ g s. o ::::: ~ 00 "'"Ij rn """Ij"'" ..... "'"+;. """I') ..... 0.. "'"+;. -. = (D t/J t:I.....1 u""' <: __ .- :::r5'0~~--~(tI=~~~~~~ ~~:.c ~~.] ~]g 8~ (fQ(D::r'VJoa <'""i~t:I~t:I L:~rnVJ (tI:::r'::! ~a-- ~(fQ ~ ~ =~. ~ g ]' 03 0.. "< = ~ 8 0 ~ f1~. 8::+" ~. . ~ 0::: '-t .....u........ l' t:lfJQ --~- t:I __ (1) 0.. ",. -S'o> :;: ,,' ... r> r> ::1'., "" - (t>::1' .,s ~ p.;:::r ~ (p- G(D(D !]t"D.-+- cr' tig 'Z SO> :;::;:~ :;S?5 - Ei ., '" C'J ~ S S;::1'::1' 12..:::::: 'TI '-< ...... 0 .............0 PJ UJ ('C = -'"'1 rOc ---~ (D ~::1'", ::1'_ "'.,< ..., ~ =p.; _.0.. 0..0""1 '-t ~ -- (') {I)::::I""', ::!1 (tI 0 > VJn p.;~ t:I(D~ 3 ~ ~~ 8i ~~5. p.; < S" ~ ~ <: (D -- @ ~ t:C "!j <ro '" '" '" "'?5 S '" $:0 t!'j.-+-n $lPJ (tIO(tl ~ :::.: t'I'j ::1' 0 -, ::: 3 0 ::: '" 0- fJ1 ~ ~ g '$ :=,..' ~ ~ 0.. _. ""'I.-+- ::r' __0 < ::: o t::., 0 -'::1' 0> (D C -. t:I ~ -.. ........ r/Jr/Jt'r1t'r1r/Jr/Jt'r1t'r1r/Jt'r1t'r1t'r1r/Jt'r1t'r1t'r1::j <~ g.<ro ~o ~ to D0~~DD~~O~~~O~~~ ~ ~~. ~g ~Q 'TI 'TI 3' 3' 'TI 'TI S 3' 'TI 3' 3' 3' 'TI 3' 3' 3' t'I'j t::::: r> 0.. '" p; 8., ;:;; -1-1o>o>-1-1~o>-1o>o>o>-1o>o>o> '=' "'< 00 S=L ~ :E ............ ......-- .-+----- ................... i$: 0"" ~....o S ~ G G G n ro ro ro ro ro ~ ~ . ~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~c g~_ Q~ ~ << <<<<< <<< ~?5~ ~S']~ ~ ~PJ PJPJ ~~~ p.:;p.J~ L, 0 ....::;' \.J.... 0 ........ ....... ........................ ............... ...................... - "'t:) '""I ...... 0 0> - ~ c c c c c c c c c c ~ "'1 ........ .- p.:; (D" (0 (D (D (I) (D (D (D (D ro (D W 2. s:. 0.. ::S ~: :1". (J "'0 (I) (1) :::.-. '-< 0 -- "h... (')....... ,-"::::p ......::: 0- ~ __ v ::: c ::: t"" :;: (3 0'13 g ~ '" ::; _. ~. -- ....... ..... 0 ('D -., ........ u, ::: ., th ""'! ..:::~ (D~;:-- 'JJ t'I'j ::1' 0> r> 0 0 ,.Q 00 (D en ~ ~ ., \.;.) .-+-.-+- tzI.-+- (0---"" :::::t! '""1 :::r' ~ ""'t -< ~ ~ (D ""'! p.:; .....- c ...... =.:: -< (D ........ :!2.. '< "' :;: '< 0> <ro - ...... 0- p.:; p.:;" (!) ::::: N ....... -- 0.. 0 ~ :;. 0 o '" v. '--" ~"'- -V Administration Buildim! Public Works I Compliance Municipal Residential Single Blue Boxes Kitchen Add'l Road Signs requested by E.-trance Permit Reports Address Sign Family Bdg. Permit Com posters Property Owner Oro-Medonte Building $50 Sign posts $7 Floor area @ ,73/sq, ft. $6 $6 Township cost (post, sign, hardware & $50 (Proposed) Environmental! Municipal Basements @ .25/sq, ft labour) Engineering $50 address signs $15 Garages Free . Subdivision $50 Zoning $50 Development Charge $20 Clearview No listing 911 signs 25 No listing No listing Business signs installed on street sign post $50 - actual sign costs + 100 + GST 911 sign installation 25 Severn $85 $31.65 each No listing No listing Settlement area 50/50 split $50 driveway entrance permit Septic only - $25 Trail signage 50/50 split inspecti()o n - no work required Directional signage 100% Township Innisfil No listing No listing (Under Review) $5 (I" one No listing No listing Permit - $75 Floor area @ .55/sq.ft. free) Refundable deposit - $500 Basements @ ,15/sq.ft residential Garages @ .20/sq.ft $750 cOl1l:1mercial More tha.n 2 inspections deduct fr<>m deposit at $451 addition~1 inspection Barrie Floor area @ ,73/sq, ft. Basements @ .25/sq, ft Garages Free Springwater $20 sign only $5,25 Do not sell No fee, in past ratepayers were required to $20, under review pay signage costs of approved, under $35 sign and review in road Occupancy By-law, installation Essa Standard $25 No listing New home I Do not sell Sign permits $60, ResIdential I day rush $40 resident Home occup, - $20 No charge Temp 2 mths or < - $25 $90, Cotr1mercial 6 mths or < - $35 Replacement I yr or < - $45 $5 Permanent sign $50 Store front sign $40 Analvsis for Fire Services ~ I Residential request for ' Non.residential inspection Re(luest inspection I , information of "remises or bid!!. Rt'quest for Mortgage Change of Day Care, Group I Hotels i Inspections Fireworks Fa Ise , Inspect. of Under Over Apparatus Elevator Response to Fire Report clearance Ownership Nursery Homes. wood 20,000 20,000 req. by Inspections stand-by al~rms calls - after open air letter Rooming I burning sq ft. sq. ft. LLBO & first call deemed out Houses appliance approvals of control installations Om- 50 50 50 75 75 150 75 75 '00 75 75 I $150 per $4.::50 flat fee After First MTO Medonte hour Ar~er 3 per Call, $150 RATES/HR. , , '2 Month . I Pe..iod: Clearview $25 $50 $50 No listing No listing No listing No listing No I No LLBO No listing Stand-by Mc::xe than 2 No listing Response to listing listing approval, after fire- in 12 months open fire I i occupant one apparatus in .he same Per app. for I i loads, fire @2fire!f. bu :aIding 1" hr $350 I routes, stand-by (per $31U0,OO Per app. for public balls I hour) $75 each V2 hr I , after $175 $75 , Springwater $50 Compliance letter requests $35 $50 No listing Solid fuel Fire request report $75 - Sales I $125 per hr. Af..-.er 2 in a No listing $75-$'00 - residential $30 appliance storage $50 per veh. 12 mth, detailed - commercial $50 $50 Comm.. bldg under - Fireworks I period $300 listing '0,000 sq [t $100 site $50 i & - Re- Current I i - Each add' I 5,000 sq inspection MTOHwy. [t $50 (each visit) rates ! $25 Essa (under $75 Letters of I No listing Annual inspect of residential! commercial No listing Residential i LLBO letter Fireworks ' Per hr. $350 I" alarm in I No listing No listing review) I compliance , bldg - 2-10 units - $100 inspection per unit of permit, - Each add. 1/2 yr - $250 I $75 I $50 compliance private $35 hr. $175 per 2m1 alarm in , $50 veh. yr - $350 , , , I 3" alarm in , , ve - $450 ! Severn SSO No listing No listing $30 No listing No listing $60 Insp. of any single 'No listing . $50 Standby at Afaer receipt No listing Emergency (includes retail! comm.. I public of .:3 to the scene Re-insp. $25 photos and industrial premise functions - sar11e in I security - , one - Under 100 m2 - $30 includes 5 cal endar year includes 2 reinspect.) - 101 m2to 1000m"- personnel - $ ::3oo/hour firefighters $50 and I pumper per-- apparatus and requisite -> '001 m'-$IOO . $200!hr. ** equipl and/or fire Reinsp. - $25 apparatus $125/hr. Innisfil 75 75 75 75/insp. 75/insp. 75/insp. 75/insp. 75 75 75 I 75/hr/fire $300 each $300/call $350!veh. 1'1 unit tiu.e. after he First call in a I 75!veh. ea cal ~ndar year add. Y2 hr. min. 1 hr. per veh. ** indicates that this fee may be waived by a resolution of Council upon written request - \ \ ~ \ \ II ~~ 00 NN ",<" .., ",,,, c: " '" .......... '" .......... to .......... ~G) ~N eel) 00 ":3$ <q<:!f o.c ~~ o tI) (j) en . t.) ._ l' Q) 40 __-r- Q) 00\ ~ --0 0\.0 D G) .' ...... ....~.qt- Q c. Q) to 5i \~; tf) ::J:J ..- v~ '" 0 g <Ft tf. ~o:: \ ; _ (0 1S E'- c: (0 0- ~ ~,~ '" 0. i 9 > ;$ (0 ._ u- '" to ..-' G> .s::; ~ ~.g ~ ~ E 6 'E <II (O;Z: J:> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 <II :1 ou,.,.9 ~' t- t\ -0 ~ '" $(0 ~ ~ 5: (l. * e- '" \:\ ! ~ ::> "'.- '" Q.. (l.(l.~ ~ ""\"" ~ (0 '" (0 :I::I: ,1;:! ~~~ ,~ ~ ~ \. ~ E E ~ o 0 <II >0 t)t) "" ~ ro ro ~ 'u c.t: .z to ~ ~ - II- .0::.0::, 2- - '(3 ~ 55 t) '.;:::> -.;::;. 0 (0(0 - '0'0 -g 00 '0 <II <II c: ~:2.:2. ~ ~~ E ~~ 0 coo (..) o :I::I: ~ ';:t \- \- (/) co 0 0 .- l ~\~\ : 0') 00 ..-' \ '-' \,.. \,.. -0 .0 00, ;z: \ ,.o::l\ ,- ~ THE. CORPORATION OF THE. - ~ J<I8llne 7 5.. 110_ ~ 00 TO W N0fI ID Om. Onti\rio LOl z...xo Phone (7QS)481-2 111 fIX (705) 487-0 I B r9k-orJ#b~ www.oro.m~ctonre .c.~ APPLlCA TION FOR GRANT/SUBSIDY NOTE: GRANTStSUBSJDIES ARE NOT AUTOMATICALLY RENEWED EVERY YEAR. NOTE: ORGANIZATIONS MAYBE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. NOTE: If .ddilional 'p.te is ,..,quired 10 complele Y01lr i"fo.......,ion, please use the a"ached sheet. Grant/Subsidy Request Amo..,t S PARi:' ~ Oreo;.;;;'ion Name'alld Aidr'es8 i;'''iO;.dd4n Organizalion O/!-O fYI/d/lL- Hocl'ZV /f,{TC)Ct/fTloH Name Address Cily Provo Poslal Code Conlac! /!r;rfft 1/;1<- , trJ%~ Telephone _, E-mail Fax PARi 11 ':'OrronkanOll,Gett-er.,.iil(;Jm.alUm Number of OulofTown Membership Fee Members Residen!s If Applicable Geographic Area Dale Served Formed Om,,," "'" m;".., _"."" """,i_ of,.." "".,,;,.,i~. ~ t/Y! O~ (/;?n:1rL-r HAf...-{... /a~ ue-/ At/Vc1-C If(jv~'y /J::.J.J'Of:I/ff-/w tYN O/.5.C. --30TIf , - r12uffI ) jJ I~ - /0 fJ fY\ . \ ~ "'1"..1'" · ......, .....'" ----- --..... -..- . --- .- \.o~ - Type of Organization (i.e. Registered Charity, Non-Profit Organization, no status, etc. ) and registration number if applicable. Nt r? X , (JpJ -(J2bh1 uM,if/'.lI7.ATltJrI Other Sources of Revenue (include amounts that bave been received or that are anticipated - ollter grants/subsidies, private funding, etc.). ---- ----- . Purpose for which the current gram/subsidy, if approved, would be used. Give complete details - (i.e. project or event description. time frame, community benefits). Do you currently receive other grants or subsidies from the Township (facility subsidization, photocopying, secretarial, etc.). 110 Previous grants/subsidies from the T own.hip? $ Year of Request: $ Year of Approval; Date: Fg 0'3/oS- t ~l21I2/t<1 <'vJi' Dare: Name & Position f 5 / /) /AA;:- :f~"if!JJi.Ce.'Vse On/p , '" .,', ,;.'.' Approved. DeniCli'" Amount $ . . Dale ' Co~epts: . Note: Personal information contained on this fonn is collected pursuant to tbe Municipal Freedom of In/ormation and Protection of Privacy Ae., and will be used for lbe purpose of determining eligibility for grants, Queslions about this collection should be directed 10 tbe Freedom ofJnfom1l!tion Coordinaror, The Corpl>raljl>n oflhe Township of Or<>-Medonte, ]48 Line 7 South, Box 100, Oro, Ontario, LQL 2XO. " >f!"EB-25-200S 10:35 ORO MEDONTE TLIP "' 1 705 487 0133 P.02 THE CORl'ORATION Of THE - 146 Line 7 S.. &0. 100 T 0 W N 6 Ii I P Oro. OntM!O lOl LXO /'hone (705)487-2171 r!!J~Of 7I6er:tfJde Fa!< (705) 487-0133 WW>N.oro.mectonte.Ci\ A 71: n-t... J? 6A-7<- e? /;L.~lAJ~ C/2./S c.~J<..?-e/L . APPLICA nON FOR GRANT/SUBSIDY NOTE: GJlANTStS\JBSJDIES ARE NOT AUTOMATICALLY RENEWED EVERY YEAR.. NOTE: ORGANIZATIONS MAY BE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. NOTE: If addil;o".1 space i. required 10 complete your information, please U5. the attaehed ,h<<t. Grant/Subsidy Requen Amount S~~ - ~ PART A':: O~l!al1ji.;'ri..1t ND;"LDmiAi'jJ,~.s l~i~~;;';;liM Organiz81ion 0(...(7 't<t , /J v r2. 110<< ki? Y Name A ddre.s G~ r/-1"4--1 i? A--~N.<:\ City Provo Po"al Code Contact /1" h/./ /ffA fA I !J&e Telephone E.-mail Fax PA'R j, B,;,c Qr"1I1Iiwlion 'Gn;e,o/ inform ati(Jn ?t?~ /,;..eV/o,-, S Number of OUlofTown Membership Fee Members Res idenls If Applicable Geographic Ares Dale Served Fonned OUlline the mission, purpose and objectives of your organization. RECEIVED FEB 2 8 2005 ORO-MEDONTE TOWNSHIP "I -'FEB-2S-200S 10:35 OR[] MEDUNlt 114-' 1 'It':;> 4t:f( "'J.;I.:I .' .t-'"t:1.5 Type of Organization (i.e. Registered Charity, Non.Profit Organization, no status, etc. ) and registration number if applicable. Other Sources of Revenue (include amounls that have been received or that are anticipated - other grants/subsidies, privale funding, elc.), Purpose for which Ihe curren! grant/subsidy, if approved, would be used, Give complete details - (i,e. project or event description, lime frame, community benefits). ;~/<-( /';7'" ICe/!>. 2. 7/0 '7 V~.-e o'? 6A-;V~vE7 /z,?' ,:? .II &:> ~t/; c~ /<.-;;Jr' /.fo~- t; tP7 (e71 <-f o /A'1 ,.if A 6Nft<.- 5'- f'J, J- 2. A .: po/-> ;'1i" /' AD)<. . I;]-D - 3'0f> ~'''''' Do you currently receive other grants or subsidies from the Township (faciJily subsidization, photocopying, secretarial, elc.). ,../.,. Previous grants/subsidies from rhe Township? Amounl Requested: $ Year of Request: Amounl Approved: $ Year of Approval: pjji/,i:e:.. Sif!~/lI"re I1fAuih;'i-k~40fficj;'i{51 ( ~O Ahu. MA c L~oo - ....A-,w.4.5 Ji t'2 Date: r::.0. 1- $/0 <; ~ . Name & Position Dale: Name & Position 'f'p. OjJi~i:'UseO..1y , '.. l\P'proved ' , ' Dei1ieil , ! '., Amount $ Dale C.s!iurients: - Note: Personal informDtion conla;ned on this form is collecled pursuant 10 the Municipal Freedom of In/orma/ion and PrOtection of Privaq Act, and will be used for the purpose of determining eligibility for grams. Question,; ::tbom this collec1jon should be diJccled to the Freedom of Information Coordinator: The Corporation of ,he Township of Oro-Medonte, 148 Line 7 South, Bo~ J 00, Oro, Ontario, LtJL 2XO. \Q~-\ @ Ontario The Ontario Volunteer Service Awards NOMINATION FORM Nominators must certify nominations as outlined on the final page of this form. Personal information on this form is collected under the authority of the Ministry of Citizenship and Culture Act, R.S.O.1990, eM.IS, sA and will be used to determine eligibility and notify recipients of the Ontario Volunteer Service Awards. For further information, please contact the Director, Ontario Honours and Awards Secretariat, 400 University Avenue, Ground Floor, South Lobby, Toronto ON M7A 2R9, (416) 314-7523. (Please type or print clearly and complete in full) NOMINATING GROUP or ORGANIZATION Name Township of Oro-Medonte Address P.O. Box 100 Suite/Unit # STREET OR P. O. BOX NUMBER City!Town Oro Postal Code LOL 2XO County Simcoe E-mail info@oro-medonte. ca Telephone: ( 705) 487-2171 Fax: ( 705) 48 7 -0133 Year group or organization formed 1994 (Amalgamated) Please indicate below the total number of volunteers in group or organization: c::=J Senior Citizens (ages 65 years and over) c::=J Adults (over 24) c::=J Youth (24 and under) HEAD OF GROUPOR ORGANIZATION (CHAIR. PRESIDENT, ETe.) '!'IMr. 0 Mrs. 0 Ms. 0 Other First Name(s) J. Neil Last Name Craig Title Mayor Address POBox 100 Suite/Unit # STREET OR P. O. BOX NUMBER City!Town Oro Postal Code LOT no Telephone: ( 705) 487-2171 E-mail: np; 1 rr~;g@nrn-medonte Cs CONTACT _.__.~ ri Mr. 0 Mrs. 0 Ms. First Name Chris Last Name(s) Carter Title Manager of Recreation & Communi i::Vnail recrea tion@oro-medon te. ca Telephone: ( 705) 487-2171 Servic~:x:( 705) 487-01 ii Brief description of objectives and activit s of your group or organization To rotect the natural h ita e s stem of 0 -M stewardship of the Township ~ources so that they are available for , future generations and to do so''iJ::! a way that has the greatest positive impact on the quali ty of life in Oro:';M'edoDj;e. \n i\ \-ct- o Mr. 0 Mrs. 0 Ms. I Details of volunteer service with nominating group or First Name(s) George i organization, including items of special interest L t N B h I Manage the operation of the Craighur t as ame urn am R 'd f I Add 12 W dl d C I Community Hall on behalf of the est enta ress 00 an res. STAEET OA P. O. BOX NUMBEA Apt./Unit# Township. Responsible for co- City!Town Barrie Postal CodeL4M 4 Y8 ordinating special events & fundrais Telephone ( 705) 722-1173 I money to meet the operating & capit 1 AGE CATEGORY (please check one only) i CEREMONY LOCATION costs of the hall. o Senior Citizen (65 years and over) 0 Adult (over 24) I 0 Invite recipient to ceremony closest to their residential address o Youth (24 and under) i 0 Invite recipient to ceremony closest to the organization's address Number of consecutive years as a volunteer in the organization i Preferred language of communication o Mr. 0 Mrs. 0 Ms. Details of volunteer service with nominating group or First Name(s) organization, including items of special interest Last Name Residential Address STREET OR ?, O. 80X NUMBER Apt./Unit# City!Town Postal Code Telephone ( ) AGE CATEGORY (please check one only) CEREMONY LOCATION o Senior Citizen (65 years and over) 0 Adult (over 24) o Invite recipient to ceremony closest to their residential address [J Youth (24 and under) o Invite recipient to ceremony closest to the organization's address Number of consecutive years as a volunteer in the organization Preferred language of communication CERTIFICATION CLAUSE Information for nominators l\clore signing the certification below, please ensure that you have read the accompanying information sheet entitled the Ontario Volunteer Service Awards and are satisfied the nominations you have made fit within the parameters of the award program as described and all of the nominees are, in your opinion, deserving 01 the award. Nomination Certification I hereby certify that I have been a member in good standing in the above-named group or organization and to the best 01 my knowledge I certify that all of the information provided on this lorm is true and assert it is my belief that each of the nominees listed above is deserving of an Ontario Volunteer Service Award since he/she meets the requirements of the award, Name (print) Title Signature . . Date Completed forms must be received by April 8, 2005. Please submit signed, original forms only. SEND TO: Ontario Honours and Awards Secretariat Ministry of Citizenship and Immigration 400 University Avenue, Ground Floor, South Lobby, Toronto ON M7A 2R9 Tel: (416) 314.7526 Fax: (416) 314.7743 61-544 (02/05) () ,',-., -:...... ".... Moved by Seconded by That the following statements be added to the job description for the CAO ...-. "The Chief Administrative Officer shall be responsible to the Council and shall perform his/her duties in conformity with Council decisions." And... 'J) Administers and manages all policy decisions of Council and regularly '* ___~ort to Council upon actions taken" ~~ 7~ I ~~~ o,~*>' '-J:o..../..--~~-,~.(: :'14"- ~ q~~~EQO) o~~ "'" ' !"'I" ~',-:-:..::_m_' ,', ~>;f .' -::::.:~, ~c.c",~c'm..., ;;' "'~~ TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE REPORT DEPT. REPORT NO.: TO: COMMITTEE OF THE PREPARED BY: EES2005-05 WHOLE Keith Mathieson SUBJECT: DEPARTMENT: COUNCIL: Annual Compliance Report - Engineering and Canterbury Water Supply Environmental Services C.OFW.: and Treatment - 2004 DATE: MOTION #: March 15, 2005 DATE: R. M. FILE NO.: E05-14518 ~JJACI{G~()IJNI): - Section 4 of the Certificate of Approval issued to the Township of Oro-Medonte requires a written report detailing compliance with all terms and conditions of the approval to be completed annually. This Report is to be signed by a person designated by Council of the municipality that owns the works and a resolution is to be presented to Council that the Compliance Report has been received. The Compliance Report was due to be completed by March 31,2005 and available for inspection by any member of the public without charge. ~ttN~f.;YSIS: - Attached is the Annual Compliance Report for 2004 for the Canterbury Water Supply System, a copy of which will be submitted to the Ministry of the Environment. This Report is being made available to Council for information and confirmation that Ontario Regulation #170/03 has been complied with by the Township of Oro-Medonte, and identifies any non-compliance issues and Provincial Officer's Orders. Cf,q- ~ RECOMMENDATION(S)~ - 1. THAT Report #EES2005-05 be received and adopted. 2. AND THAT Council receives the Annual Compliance Report for 2004 for the Canterbury Water Supply System. /) . Re~ect~lIy submitted, ~ Keith Mathieson Q -~ ~ THE CORPORATION OF THE 148 Line 7 5.. Box 100 TO WN 8ft IP Ora, Ontario LOL 2XO Phone (705) 487-2171 Fax (705) 487-0133 -&~Of7#6ecdJde www.oro-medonte.ca March 9, 2005 Ministry of the Environment 54 Cedar Pointe Drive Unit #1201 BARRIE, Ontario L4N 5R7 Re: Canterbury Water Supply and Treatment System Annual Compliance Report for 2004 Canterbury Water System supplies 17 homes with water from two (2) ground water source wells. Permit to Take Water #92-P-3028, issued to the Township of Oro-Medonte, authorizes the withdrawal of water, expiring December 15, 2011. The volume of water withdrawn from Well #1 and Well #2 shall not exceed 104 m3 (104,544 litres) per day. The water treatment plant is to be operated to treat water at a rate not to exceed the maximum flow rate of 209 m3 per day. WATER QUANTITY Schedules have been attached showing the "average daily flow" per month and the "maximum daily flow" per month, and the maximum flow of treated water to the distribution system for the Canterbury system. At no time during 2004 did the "maximum daily flow" exceed the Permit to Take Water or exceed the maximum flow rate of treated water to the distribution system, as per Section 1.3 of the Certificate of Approval. The highest "daily flow" for the year from Well #1 occurred on July 3rd at 21 m3; Well #2 occurred on July 3rd and July 11th at 25 m3; and to the distribution system, it was 46 m3 on July 3rd. To ensure accuracy to within + or - 5% of flow within the range of 10% to 100% of the full scale reading of the magnetic flow meters, Summa Engineering Limited calibrated them on September 20, 2004. .. ./2 ~ Page Two Letter to M.O.E. Re: Canterbury - Annual Compliance Report for 2004 March 9, 2005 WATER QUALITY Bacteriological samples were taken weekly from the wells, pumphouse and distribution system, by certified Operators employed by the Township and submitted to Central Ontario Analytical Laboratory in Orillia. Two hundred and sixty (260) samples were tested for "total coliforms" and "fecal coliforms", and one hundred and four (104) tests for HPC in 2004. There were no detectable results in 2004. To ensure that the chlorine residual was maintained above 0.2 mg/L in the distribution system, and a free chlorine residual was available in the distribution system, 12% Sodium Hypochlorite was pumped into the system. A total of 80 litres of 12% Sodium Hypochlorite, or an average of .24 Uday, was used in the Canterbury system in 2004. Four hundred and seventeen (417) daily tests for free chlorine in the distribution system were performed by certified Township Operators using a "Hack Pocket Colorimeter" during 2004. These tests were performed to ensure chlorine residual was above 0.2 mg/L in the distribution system. A Prominent Dulcometer analyses the chlorine residual continuously after the 15 minute contact time and is recorded by a data logger. An On-Line ABB 4670 Series Turbidity Meter measures turbidity continuously after the 15 minute contact time and is recorded by a data logger. Raw water turbidity tests are performed monthly by Township staff using a "Hack Pocket Turbidity Meter" and recorded in the daily log book. Quarterly water quality analyses sampling was performed by GeoSpec Engineering Ltd. in order to satisfy testing parameters for treated water, as per Ontario Regulation #170/03 dated June, 2003. Samples were taken by GeoSpec Engineering Ltd. and forwarded to Lakefield Research Limited for chemical testing. The chemical results did not reveal any health related reportable exceedences during 2004. On February 7, 2003, the Ministry of the Environment issued Amended Certificate of Approval #7433-5J4JHG for the Canterbury Water Supply System. On August 5, 2004, the Ministry of the Environment issued Certificate of Approval #2993-62MPY J for the installation of the standby generator set. .. ./3 Page Three - Letter to M.O.E. Re: Canterbury - Annual Compliance Report for 2004 March 9. 2005 "COMPLIANCE WITH TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE CERTIFICATE OF APPROV AL" All required upgrades, as per Section 5.0 of the Certificate of Approval, were completed by the Township in 2003. The commissioning of the natural gas standby generator was completed in the Fall of 2004. PROVINCIAL OFFICER'S ORDER On June 24, 2004, the Ministry of the Environment inspected the Canterbury Water System to confirm compliance with current Regulations and to review the Permit to Take Water and Certificate of Approval. From this inspection, the Ministry issued Order Number 8761-64CQEE ordering six (6) work orders, attached as Schedule II. Order #'s 1-4 were satisfied by completion and implementing a "Procedure for Reporting Adverse Free Chlorine Residuals". Order #'s 5-6 were satisfied by applying to amend the existing Certificate of Approval on November 24, 2004. "NON-COMPLIANCE WITH TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE CERTIFICATE OF APPROV AL" From the June 24, 2004 inspection, ten (10) non-compliances with regulatory requirements and actions required were noted and are attached as Schedule I. "BEST PRACTICES RECOMMENDATIONS" From the June 24, 2004 inspection, the Ministry, in the interest of continuous improvement, provided the Township of Oro-Medonte with a list of thirty-two (32) suggestions for the operation of the Canterbury Water System. From this list, the Township of Oro-Medonte has presently completed nineteen (19) of these suggestions. Any further information required with respect to this Compliance Report for the Canterbury Water System should be directed to the undersigned at (705) 487-2171. Sincerely, S IP OF ORO-MEDONTE Kei athieson, C.R.S.I. Director of Engineering and Environmental Services KM/ps Attachments . S~~r ~ . Ministry of the Environment ~ Of'!t_a,no," ________ ",_____ ..,'________~~i~~~~~~:.t~r~~~t~I11_~~_~~~~~i~~,_R=p~rt ..."-_._,.,.~---,-~, --- ,,-..-.. ---.---.--.--.--.. ACTIONS REQUIRED 1 The Operating Authority failed to sample and test for chlorine free residual in the distribution system on a daily basis as required by Schedule 7-2(3) of O. Reg. 170103. Samples were not taken on June 1, 2003. Action(s) Required: None. The Operating Authority monitored free chlorine residual in the distribution system thereafter as required. 2 The Operating Authority failed to take the necessary corrective actions in response to observed adverse conditions at the facility as required by Schedule 18-2(1 ),(2),(3) of O. Reg. 170103. Incidents occurred on August 29, 30 of 2003, and February 1, 2, 4,5,6,7, March 2, 3, 18, 19, 27, 28, and April 28, of 2004 in which the chlorine free residual analyzer malfunctioned or recorded a value of less than 0.2 mg/L which is the concentration required by the Canterbury CofA (7433-5J4JHG) at the point of entry to the distribution system. Action(s) Required: The Operating Authority shall ensure that alarm situations are promptly responded to, documented and appropriate corrective actions are carried out and documented to ensure proper disinfection of drinking water is maintained or restored as soon as possible. 3 The Operating Authority failed to report orally and in written format an observation that indicates improperly disinfected water may have been directed to the distribution system as required by Schedule 16-4, 16-6 and 16-7 of O. Reg. 170103. Incidents occurred on August 29,30 of 2003, and February 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, March 2, 3, 18, 19, 27, 28, and April 28, of 2004 in which the chlorine free residual analyzer malfunctioned or recorded a value of less than 0.2 mg/L which is the concentration required by the Canterbury CofA (7433-5J4JHG) at the point of entry to the distribution system. Action(s) Required: The Operating Authority shall report orally and in written format as required if, upon review of the data logger information, or any other observation, it is indicated that the continuous chlorine free residual analyzer malfunctioned or the chlorine free residual fell below 0.2 mg/L at the Canterbury pumphouse. 4 The Operating Authority failed to provide a notice of issue resolution including actions taken and lor results achieved within seven (7) days or otherwise after an adve",e condition was resolved as required by Schedule 16-9(1 )a,b of O. Reg. 170103. Incidents occurred on August 29, 30 of 2003, and February 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, March 2,3, 18, 19,27,28, and April 28, of 2004 in which the chlorine free residual analyzer malfunctioned or recorded a value of less than 0.2 mg/L which is the concentration required by the Canterbury CofA (7433-5J4JHG) at the point of entry to the distribution system. There were indications on these dates that improperly disinfected water may have been directed to the distribution system which is a reportable event as per Schedule 16-4 of O. Reg. 170103. Action(s) Required: The Operating AuthOrity shall provide notice of issue resolution including actions taken and results achieved to the Spills Action Centre and Simcoe County District Health Unit within seven (7) days of an adverse condition being resolved. I) The Operating Authority failed to record the time each Operator spent as Operator in Charge as required by Section 18 of O. Reg. 435/93. Action(s) Required: None. The Operating Authority now records the amount of time each Operator serves as Operator in Charge. __'M_'_._'_'___"_~'"'____________"___'_"__'_'_________'....___..___m_ __~._.__,..____.,.,,,._....__.__.._____________...______..._"'_'__'n'_..'__" .... __....___._____._. .M.__.._~_____.___._ __'__"'''___ e Generated for sauerph on 10/25/2004 Page 26 of32 - . tm\ 0 . Ministry of the Environm (i;; ~ ntano Drinking Water System Inspection Rep ~ __.. .,.m.m__ ,..,m..... ......__......_.....__m...mmmm"..._'....__..,.....,.. ..__. ."_ . ._.. _......m.. ._. _.... .........._ _......" ....... ._._ ,_.._, .,_ _ ._,..._ no.. ",__.._._,_ e........ .._..........._,,_.. ..... _'__,_.m..._.._'_...mm............_m.................._..."....__....__.__~_..._ 6 The Operating Authority has failed to fully comply with Parts 1.2, 1.3, -Performance - in S U Certificate of Approval 7433-5J4JHG and Special Condition 14 in Permit to Take Water 92-P- 3028. Flow measuring devices are to be in place at the Canterbury facility which can measure . and record instantaneous flow rates in Umin and pump run times from each source well into the treatment facility. This capability is currently not in place. Action(s) Required: None. The Municipality is currently installing flow measuring and . recording equipment capable of measuring instantaneous flows at the Canterbury facility. It is expected this work will be completed in the fall of 2004. 7 The Operating Authority has failed to sample sodium in the correct location. Schedule 6-2 of O. Reg. 170103 requires sodium to be sampled at the point of entry to the distribution system. The sample collected on December 18, 2003 was collected in the distribution system. Action(s) Required: The Operating Authority will resample for sodium at the point of entry to the distribution system by May 31, 2008. 8 The Operating Authority failed to install the revised Operations and Maintenance Manual in the Canterbury facility by February 7, 2004 as required by Section 3.9 of CofA 7433-5J4JHG. The manual was installed in late April or early May 2004. Action(s) Required: None. The manual is now completed and installed in the facility. 9 The Operating Authority failed to fully document any unusual events, departures from normal operating procedures, abnormal conditions and the times these event occurred, the lengths of the events, or the actions taken at the facility as required by Section 20(5) 3, 4, 5 of O. Reg. 435/93. Action(s) Required: The Operating Authority shall record in the facility iogbooks the approximate initial time, time at completion, cause of If or, actions taken, date, staff member(s) present, results achieved, and location of any operational checks, alarms, tests, repairs, unusual andlor abnormal conditions andlor directions or adjustments made on or within the Canterbury system. 10 The Operating Authority failed to ensure that water treatment equipment is installed at the Canterbury faciiity in compliance with CofA 7433-5J4JHG. The sample location for the continuous turbidity analyzer does not correspond to the sample location prescribed in the CofA. Action(s) Required: The Operating Authority shall comply with the prescribed sample location or apply for an amendment to the CofA to change the sample location to the current location by November 30, 2004. Report Generated for sauerph on 10/25/2004 Page 27, I",!,o 1 St'" '~J'-E. n @ M'";",,~'" Provincial Officer's Order Order Number ~'. Environment 8761-64CQEE Environmental. Protection A(.t, R.s.O. 1990, c.E 19 (EP A) Ministere de Ontario Water Resources Act, R.8.0. 1990, c. Q. 40 (OWRA) , , ,'I'Environnement Pesticides Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. PH (PA) Ontario Safe Drinking Water Act, S.D. 2002, c.32 (SDWA) Nutrient Management Act, 2002, S.O. 2002, c.4 To: The Corporation of the Township ofOro-Medonte PO Box 100 Oro, Ontario, LOL 2XO Canada Site: Lot: 24, Concession: 7 Oro-Medonte, County of Simcoe Work Ordered I. Effective immediately, the Operating Authority of the Canterbury Water System shall make the required notifcations as prescribed by Schedule 16-4 ofO. Reg. 170/03 in the event of any observation being made which indicates that improperly disinfected water may have been discharged to the distribution system. 2. Effective immediately, the Operating Authority of the Canterbury Water System shall take all corrective actions as prescribed by Schedule 18-2 of O. Reg. 170/03 in the event of any observation being made which indicates that improperly disinfected water may have been discharged to the distribution system. 3. Effective immediately, the Operating Authority of the Canterbury Wa.ter System shall provide all required Notice(s) ofIssue Resolution within seven days of the issue being resolved as preseribed by Schedule 16-9 ofO. Reg. 170/03 in the event of any observation being made which indicates that improperly disinfected water may have been discharged to the distribution system. 4. Effective immediately, the Operating Authority of the Canterbury Water System shall ensure that abnonnal conditions, departures from nonnal operating procedures, equipment taken out of or put in service, or any other unusual event are all fully documented including times, actions taken and results achieved in the facility logbooks as prescribed by O. Reg. 435/93, Section 20(5) and O. Reg. 128/04 Section 27(5). Page 1 - NUMBER 8761-64CQEE -. ~ 5. The Operating Authority shall ensure that the location of the sample point for the Canterbury facility turbidimeter corresponds to the location in the facility umber Certificate of Approval (7433-5J4JHG), or, submit a complete application to ICQEE amend Certificate of Approval 7433-5J4JHG to the Director of the Environmental Licencing and Approvals Branch, 2 SI. Claire Avenue West, Toronto to reflect the sample location for the turbidimeter at the end of the contact chamber at the Canterbury Water System. A copy of this Provincial Officer Order shall be included with the application. The application shall include the appropriate fees and be complete to the satisfaction of the Director. Submit the application by November 30, 2004. 6. Submit written notice to the undersigned that the work required by option I of the Work Ordered Item #5 has been completed or provide a copy of the application required by option 2 of Work Ordered Item #5 to the undersigned by November 30, 2004. A. While this Order is in effect, a copy or copies of this order shall be posted in a conspicuous place. B. While this Order is in effect, report in writing, to the District or Area office, any significant changes of operation, emission, ownership, tenancy or other legal status of the facility or operation. This Order is being issued for the reasons set out in the annexed Provincial Officers Report which forms part of this Order. Issued at Oro-Medonte this 26th day of October, 2004. (iJ4 '-------- Phillip Sauer Badge No: Barrie District Office Tel: (705) 739-6441 )EE Page 2. NUMBER 8761-64CQEE ~~ - O;~/.--'-_.'<~~~\" Iff itJ~) ~ '1 ~, ~ ~. 'ft,;/ , 'Jt , 'Q":""'~7"Y ~~~<9 TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE REPORT DEPT. REPORT NO.: TO: COMMITTEE OF THE PREPARED BY: EES2005-06 WHOLE Keith Mathieson SUBJECT: DEPARTMENT: COUNCIL: Annual Compliance Report- Engineering and Cedarbrook Water Supply Environmental Services C.OFW.: and Treatment - 2004 DATE: MOTION #: March 15, 2005 DATE: R. M. FILE NO.: E05-14518 ~B~~K~g(:)UNIl: i Section 4 of the Certificate of Approval issued to the Township of Oro-Medonte requires a written report detailing compliance with all terms and conditions of the approval to be completed annually. This Report is to be signed by a person designated by Council of the municipality that owns the works and a resolution is to be presented to Council that the Compliance Report has been received. The Compliance Report was due to be completed by March 31,2005 and available for inspection by any member of the public without charge. ~t\'1N't\'Jj\'$t$j i Attached is the Annual Compliance Report for 2004 for the Cedarbrook Water Supply System, a copy of which will be submitted to the Ministry of the Environment. This Report is being made available to Council for information and confirmation that Ontario Regulation #170/03 has been complied with by the Township of Oro-Medonte, and identifies any non-compliance issues. 'i, \ \ , C\.i"- \ ~ RECOMMEND A TION(S)~ - 1. THAT Report #EES2005-06 be received and adopted. 2. AND THAT Council receives the Annual Compliance Report for 2004 for the Cedarbrook Water Supply System. Re,p~=bm","d Keith Mathieson ~ THE CORPORATION OfTHE 148 Line 7 S., Box tOO TO WN8II1 P Ora, Ontario LOL 2XO Phone (705) 487-2171 fax (705) 487~0133 rgmOf7l6~ www,oro-medonte.ca March 9, 2005 Ministry of the Environment 54 Cedar Pointe Drive Unit #1201 BARRIE, Ontario L4N 5R7 Re: Cedarbrook Water Supply and Treatment System Annual Compliance Report for 2004 Cedarbrook Water System supplies 24 homes with water from two (2) ground water source wells. Permit to Take Water #95-P-5036, issued to the Township of Oro-Medonte, authorizes the withdrawal of water, expiring March 31, 2006 for Well #1 and Well #2. The withdrawal of water is not to exceed 194 m3 per day, for each well. The water treatment plant is to be operated to treat water at a rate not to exceed the maximum flow rate of 196 m3 per day. WATER QUANTITY Schedules have been attached showing the "average daily flow" per month and the "maximum daily flow" per month, and the maximum flow of treated water to the distribution system for the Cedarbrook system. At no time during 2004 did the "maximum daily flow" exceed the Permit to Take Water or exceed the maximum flow rate of treated water to the distribution system, as per Section 4.1 of the Certificate of Approval. The highest "daily flow" for the year from Well #1 occurred on June 6th, 13th, and September 26th at 17 m3; Well #2 occurred on June 13th and September 26th at 20 m3; and to the distribution system, it was 37 m3 on June 13th and September 26th. To ensure accuracy to within + or - 5% of flow within the range of 10% to 100% of the full scale reading of the magnetic flow meters, Summa Engineering Limited calibrated them on September 20, 2004. .. ./2 q~-\ Page Two Letter to M.O.E. Re: Cedarbrook - Annual Compliance Report for 2004 March 9, 2005 WATER QUALITY Bacteriological samples were taken weekly from the wells, pumphouse and distribution system, by certified Operators employed by the Township and submitted to Central Ontario Analytical Laboratory in Orillia. Two hundred and sixty (260) samples were tested for ''total coliforms" and "fecal coli forms", and one hundred and four (104) tests for HPC in 2004. There were no detectable results in 2004. To ensure that the chlorine residual was maintained above 0.2 mg/L in the distribution system, and a free chlorine residual was available in the distribution system, 12% Sodium Hypochlorite was pumped into the system. A total of 120 litres of 12% Sodium Hypochlorite, or an average of .40 Uday, was used in the Cedarbrook system in 2004. Four hundred and seventeen (417) daily tests for free chlorine in the distribution system were performed by certified Township Operators using a "Hack Pocket Colorimeter" during 2004. These tests were performed to ensure chlorine residual was above 0.2 mg/L in the distribution system. A Prominent Dulcometer analyses the chlorine residual continuously after the 15 minute contact time and is recorded by a data logger. An On-Line ABB 4670 Series Turbidity Meter measures turbidity continuously after the 15 minute contact time and is recorded by a data logger. Raw water turbidity tests are performed monthly by Township staff using a "Hack Pocket Turbidity Meter" and recorded in the daily log book. Quarterly water quality analyses sampling was performed by Geospec Engineering Ltd. in order to satisfy testing parameters for treated water, as per Ontario Regulation #170/03 dated June, 2003. Samples were taken by GeoSpec Engineering Ltd. and forwarded to Lakefield Research Limited for chemical testing. The chemical results did not reveal any health related reportable exceedences during 2004. Samples obtained from the Cedarbrook distribution system were found to have Sodium results of 18.7 mg/L, which is slightly lower than previous results. Although the aesthetic objective of Sodium in drinking water is 200 mg/L, the Medical Officer of Health was notified of the Sodium results. .. ./3 Page Three Letter to M.DE ~< Re: Cedarbrook - Annual Compliance Report for 2004 March 9. 2005 On August 5, 2004, the Ministry of the Environment issued Certificate of Approval #6366-62MQCE for the installation of the standby power generator, and Amended Certificate of Approval #5391-645KPK dated August 24,2004, extending the time frame of the installation of the standby power unit for the Cedarbrook Water Supply System. "COMPLIANCE WITH TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL" Under Part 8, Upqradinq Requirements, the Certificate of Approval required the Township to have the standby natural gas generator set installed by September 30, 2004; this work was completed by Mazur Electrical prior to September 30th. All other required upgrades were completed in 2003. "NON-COMPLIANCE WITH TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE CERTIFICATE OF APPROV AL" On April 21, 2004, the Ministry of the Environment performed an unannounced inspection of the Cedarbrook Water System to confirm compliance with current Regulations and to review the Permit to Take Water and Certificate of Approval. From this inspection, four (4) non-compliance issues and actions required were identified and are attached as Schedule I. "BEST PRACTICES RECOMMENDATIONS" From the April 21, 2004 inspection, the Ministry, in the interest of continuous improvement, provided the Township of Oro-Medonte with a list of twenty-two (22) suggestions for the operation of the Cedarbrook Water System. From this list, the Township of Oro-Medonte has presently completed fourteen (14) of these suggestions. Any further information required with respect to this Compliance Report for the Cedarbrook Water System should be directed to the undersigned at (705) 487-2171. Sincerely, \ $HIP OF ORO-MEDONTE K hieson, C.R.S.I. Director of Engineering and Environmental Services KM/ps Attachments - e' .' ~ .i c..~ :t r~--' I; ~SECTION 6 - SUMMARY OF NON COMPLIANCE ISSUES & ACTIONS 4 IREQUIRED tj II. The Operating Authority failed to sample and test for chlorine free residual in the d distribution .system on a daily basis as required by Schedule 7-2(3) of O. Reg. 170/03. i Samples were not taken on June 1 and 2 of 2003. ~ ~T Action(s) Required: None. The Operating Authority monitored free chlorine residual in b F- the distribution system thereafter as required. r r , Ortkr Number: I Coml1liance ])ate: lmmediatelv , s ~. 2. The Operating Authority failed to sample and test for heterotrophic plate count on . distribution system water bacteriological samples as required by Schedule 11 Section 2(c) of O. Reg. 170/03. Sample dates in question were June 2, 10, and 17 of 2003. Action(s) Required: None. The Operating Authority sampled and tested all Cedarbrook bacteriological distribution water samples for heterotrophic plate count thereafter as required. Order Number: I Coml1liance ])ate: lmmediatelv , \ j; ~...; I~; Cedorhrook Water SUDDlv. MOE InsDection 2004/04/21. Paf!e 26 or 38 . - @ Ontario Ministry of the Environment Drinking Water Inspection Report 3. The Operating Authority has failed to fully comply with Section 6.10 (i),(ii), and (iii) - Well Inspection and Maintenance - in Certificate of Approval 7362-5TVQ94. A well .", inspection and maintenance plan was to be developed which included scheduled inspection ~ Jt frequencies by an appropriately qualified professional, defined procedures for the inspection of the entire well structure and remedial action plans to be implemented ifwells ,II prove to be noncompliant with regulatory requirements. This was to be completed by April flJ 14, 2004. J, It ". Action(s) Required: None. The Municipality has produced and implemented a Well d, Inspection and Maintenance Plan which satisfies the intent and requirements of Certificate .. /1 of Approval 7362-5TVQ94 as of June 24, 2004. d T Comnliance Date: AUJ!ust 1,2004 . /, Order Number: ,. r .. The Operating Authority has failed to fully comply with Parts 5.1 (i), (ii), and 5.2 - Flow ., / 4. measuring devices - in Certificate of Approval 7362-5TVQ94. Flow measuring devices are s . to be in place at the Cedarbrook facility which can measure daily maximum flow rate (peak flow) into and out of the treatment facility. This capability is currently not in place. Y. j I Action(s) Required: None. The Municipality is currently installing flow measuring and .. recording equipment capable of measuring instantaneous flows at the Cedarbrook Facility. 111. j It is expected this work will be completed in the fall of2004. J I ComDliance Date: II. , Order Number: November 30, 2004 I I I J 2. I I I 13. """'" ~ Of Oll:O~!h ~... .".~---_ -4t.i"~ !RJ~ q 0,' ~ ~ - \ ... i! ... ~::,,'iI'" ~~ ~:::~,'" TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE REPORT DEPT. REPORT NO.: TO: COMMITTEE OF THE PREPARED BY: EES2005-07 WHOLE Keith Mathieson SUBJECT: DEPARTMENT: COUNCIL: Annual Compliance Report - Engineering and Craighurst Water Supply Environmental Services C.OFW.: and Treatment - 2004 DATE: MOTION #: March 15, 2005 DATE: R. M. FILE NO.: E05-14518 ~~~~~~~~~'N~: , Section 4 of the Certificate of Approval issued to the Township of Oro-Medonte requires a written report detailing compliance with all terms and conditions of the approval to be completed annually. This Report is to be signed by a person designated by Council of the municipality that owns the works and a resolution is to be presented to Council that the Compliance Report has been received. The Compliance Report was due to be completed by March 31, 2005 and available for inspection by any member of the public without charge. ~1S.~1S.~'\t$)J$); :i Attached is the Annual Compliance Report for 2004 for the Craighurst Water Supply System, a copy of which will be submitted to the Ministry of the Environment. This Report is being made available to Council for information and confirmation that Ontario Regulation #170/03 has been complied with by the Township of Oro-Medonte, and identifies any non-compliance issues. ~v,- \<t, ~ RECOMMENDATION(S): - 1. THAT Report #EES2005-07 be received and adopted. 2. AND THAT Council receives the Annual Compliance Report for 2004 for the Craighurst Water Supply System. R"E_,"bm;.", Keith Mathieson ~q - THE CORPORATION OF THE 148 Line 7 S.. Box 100 TO W N0liI P Ora, Onta.rio LOL 2XO Phone (705) 487-2171 Fax (705) 487,Of33 r9mOF7#6e?~ w\vw.oro-medonte..cd March 9, 2005 Ministry of the Environment 54 Cedar Pointe Drive Unit #1201 BARRIE, Ontario L4N 5R7 Re: Craighurst Water Supply and Treatment System Annual Compliance Report for 2004 Craighurst Water System supplies 51 homes with water from three (3) ground water source wells. Permit to Take Water Renewal #92-P-3120 for Well #'s 1, 2 and 3 was issued to the Township of Oro-Medonte on December 14, 2001, expiring December 15, 2011. The withdrawal of water is not to exceed 64 m3 for Well #1, 229 m3 for Well #2, and 229 m3 for Well #3, per day. The combined total of water taken from the three (3) wells is not to exceed 229 m3 per day. The water treatment plant is to be operated to treat water at a rate not to exceed the maximum flow rate of 458 m3 per day. WATER QUANTITY Schedules have been attached showing the "average daily flow" per month and the "maximum daily flow" per month, and the maximum flow of treated water to the distribution system, as per Section 1.3 of the Certificate of Approval, for the Craighurst system. At no time during 2004 did the "maximum daily flow" exceed the Permit to Take Water or exceed the maximum flow rate of treated water to the distribution system. The highest "daily flow" for the year is as follows: . Well #1 was not used in 2004 . Well #2 occurred on June 13lh at 62 m3 . Well #3 occurred on June 13th at 110 m3 , and . To the distribution system, it was 169 m3 on June 13th. .. ./2 n "6 ~ Page Two Letter to M.O.E. Re: Craighurst - Annual Compliance Report for 2004 March 9. 2005 To ensure accuracy to within + or - 5% of flow within the range of 10% to 100% of the full scale reading of the magnetic flow meters, Summa Engineering Limited calibrated them on September 21, 2004. WATER QUALITY Bacteriological samples were taken weekly from the wells, pumphouse and distribution system, by certified Operators employed by the Township and submitted to Central Ontario Analytical Laboratory in Orillia. Two hundred and sixty (260) samples were tested for "total coliforms" and "fecal coliforms" in 2004. There were no detectable results in 2004. To ensure that the chlorine residual was maintained above 0.2 mg/L in the distribution system, and a free chlorine residual was available in the distribution system, 12% Sodium Hypochlorite was pumped into the system. A total of 120 litres of 12% Sodium Hypochlorite, or an average of .38 Uday, was used in the Craighurst system in 2004. Four hundred and seventeen (417) daily tests for free chlorine in the distribution system were performed by certified Township Operators using a "Hack Pocket Colorimeter" during 2004. These tests were performed to ensure chlorine residual was above 0.2 mg/L in the distribution system. A Prominent Dulcometer analyses the chlorine residual continuously after the 15 minute contact time and is recorded by a data logger. An On-Line ABB 4670 Series Turbidity Meter measures turbidity continuously after the 15 minute contact time and is recorded by a data logger. Raw water turbidity tests are performed monthly by Township staff using a "Hack Pocket Turbidity Meter" and recorded in the daily log book. Quarterly water quality analyses sampling was performed by Geospec Engineering Ltd. in order to satisfy testing parameters for treated water, as per Ontario Regulation #170/03 dated June, 2003. Samples were taken by GeoSpec Engineering Ltd. and forwarded to Lakefield Research Limited for chemical testing. The chemical results did not reveal any health related reportable exceedences during 2004. Samples obtained from the Craighurst distribution system were found to have a Sodium level above 20 mg/L; the concentration of Sodium was 29.9 mg/L. .. ./3 Page Three Letter to M.O.E. - Re: Craighurst - Annual Compliance Report for 2004 March 9. 2005 Although the aesthetic objective of Sodium in drinking water is 200 mg/L, the Medical Officer of Health was notified that the concentration exceeded 20 mg/L. On October 8. 2002, the Ministry of the Environment issued Amended Certificate of Approval #7367-5E9RLK for the Craighurst Water Supply System. On August 5, 2004, the Ministry of the Environment issued Certificate of Approval #8826-62MNSS for the installation of the 25Kw standby generator. "COMPLIANCE WITH TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE CERTIFICATE OF APPROV AL" Under Section 5, Upqradinq Requirements, all physical improvements were completed in 2003. "NON-COMPLIANCE WITH TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL" On September 15, 2004, the Ministry of the Environment inspected the Craighurst Water System to confirm compliance with current Regulations and to review the Permit to Take Water and Certificate of Approval. From this inspection, the Ministry issued nine (9) non-compliances with regulatory requirements and actions required, which are attached as Schedule I. "BEST PRACTICES RECOMMENDATIONS" From the September 15, 2004 inspection, the Ministry, in the interest of continuous improvement, provided the Township of Oro-Medonte with a list of thirty (30) suggestions for the operation of the Craighurst Water System. From this list, the Township of Oro-Medonte has presently completed fourteen (14) of these suggestions. Any further information required with respect to this Compliance Report for the Craighurst Water System should be directed to the undersigned at (705) 487-2171. Sincerely, T~P OF ORO-MEDONTE Kei ieson, C.R.S./. Director of Engineering and Environmental Services KM/ps Attachments S~Ut..E I Ontario Ministry of the Environment Drinking Water System Inspection Report ACTIONS REQUIRED 1 The Operating Authority failed to take the necessary corrective actions in response to background colony counts greater than 200 cfu on a bacteriological analysis from a sample collected atthe facility as required by Schedule 18-7(1) of O. Reg. 170103. The prescribed corrective action is to immediately resample and test which includes a sample from the same location, one upstream and one downstream. Only one resample was collected from the sample location. No upstream sample could be collected because this sample was a treated water sample from within the pumphouse however, no downstream sample was collected. Action(s) Required: The Operating Authority shall take the required number of resamples in any future adverse water quality incidents. 2 The Operating Authority has failed to fully comply with Parts 1.2, -Performance - and 2. 1 (c), (d). Monitoring and Recording - in Certificate of Approval 7367-5E9RLK and Schedule "A" of PTIW 92"P-3120. Flow measuring devices are to be in place at the Craighurst facility which can measure and record instantaneous flow rates in Umin and pump run times from each source well into the treatment facility. This capability is currently not in place. Action(s) Required: None. The Municipality is currently installing flow measuring and recording equipment capable of measuring instantaneous flows at the Craighurst facility. It is expected this work will be completed eariy in the new year at the latest (2005). 3 The Operating Authority has failed to sample sodium in the correct location. Schedule 6-2 of O. Reg. 170/03 requires sodium to be sampled at the point of entry to the distribution system. The sample collected on December 18, 2003 was collected in the distribution system. Action(s) Required: The Operating Authority will resample for sodium at the point of entry to the distribution system by May 31, 2008. 4 The Operating AuthOrity failed to fully document any unusual events, departures from normal operating procedures, abnormal conditions and the times these event occurred, the lengths of the evenls, or the actions taken at the facility as required by Section 20(5) 3, 4, 5 of O. Reg. 435/93. Action(s) Required: The Operating Authority shall record in the facility logbooks the approximate initial time, time et completion, cause of/for, actions taken, date, staff member(s) present, results acMwed, and location of any operational checks, alarms, tests, repairs, unusual andlor abnormal conditions andlor directions or adjustments made on or within the Craighurst system. 5 The Operating Authority has failed to sample for raw water turbidity once per month before any treatment. Schedule 7-3 of O. Reg. 170/03 requires raw water turbidity to be taken from a point before any treatment and analysed immediately once per month if the system obtains water from a ground water source. There is no record of raw water turbidity having been analysed for the months of June, July and August of 2003. Action(s) Required: None. The Operating Authority is now collecting and ana lysing a raw water turbidity sample monthly. ___M"'_'_ ,^"..n_ .,..__._~.." "___.__.... ..... '_'n___ ..._ ______ ....-.--.------..... ------, - .-..."----,-- .......-..---..,.. Report Generated for sauerph on 1/24/2005 Page 31 of36 : Ministry of the Environment Drinking Water System Inspection Report The Operating Authority ha$ failed to collect samples within the time frame prescribed by Schedule 13-6 of O. Reg. 170/03. The prescribed sampling time frame for Trihalomethanes (THM's) is at least once every three months. In 2003, samples were taken on May 28, September 9, and December 18 which were five months and four months apart respectively. In 2004, samples were taken on February 26, May 31 and September 14 which were four and five rnonths apart respectively. Action(s) Required: The Operating Authority will ensure that sampling is conducted not more than three calendar months apart as prescribed. 7 The Operating Authority has failed to collect samples within the time frame prescribed by Schedule 13-7 of O. Reg. 170/03. The prescribed sampling time frame for nitrates and nitrites is at least once every three months. In 2003, samples were taken on May 28, September 9, and Decernber 18 which were five months and four months apart respectively. In 2004, samples were taken on February 26, May 31 and September 14 which were four and five months apart respectively. Action(s) Required: The Operating Authority will ensure that sampling is conducted not more than three calendar months apart as prescribed. 8 The Operating Authority failed to ensure that water could not collect or pond around the well casing. Section 11(11) ofO. Reg. 903/90 prescribes that in a well in which the casing extends above the land surface, the well will not be constructed in such a manner that water can pond or collect around the casing. Well #1 was constructed in such a way as to allow water to pond around the ca$ing. Action(s) Required: None. As of October 14, 2004, the Operating Authority has regraded the sUrrounding land surface around Well #1 in such a manner that water will no longer collect or pond around the casing. 9 The Operating Authority has failed to fully comply with Schedule 11-2 (2c) which requires that at lea$t one distribution sampie be taken each week and tested for heterotrophic plate count. Bacteriological samples were taken weekly from the distribution system from June 1, 2003 until February 16, 2004 (38 weeks) which were not tested for helerotrophic plate count as required. Action(s) Required: None. The Operating Authority now tests all distribution samples collected from this system for heterotrophic plate count. ___~_~__~______,.___~___^'__ .,.,.,_____.____._______n..__. ______,_____ ._ M'__ ._.....__.._....__...____"._,,__. __ _ .___,m_ _".'.__'n'____________,__.__._._.____ ..m.,' _m._".____"__ __._.____..____.._._"..n. Report Generated for sauerph on 1/24/2005 Page 32 of36 ?~ q ~, ~,.___.__.__~1t.(: i.f" o .Ib' ~ ~ tt- ,/ '\ii', '-'-;"'7'''' -;;;;;~- TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE REPORT DEPT. REPORT NO.: TO: COMMITTEE OF THE PREPARED BY: EES2005-08 WHOLE Keith Mathieson SUBJECT: DEPARTMENT: COUNCIL: Annual Compliance Report - Engineering and Harbourwood Water Supply Environmental Services C.OFW.: and Treatment - 2004 DATE: MOTION #: March 15, 2005 DATE: R. M. FILE NO.: E05-14518 ~:~i~~~'R.~i.~<"..' a Section 4 of the Certificate of Approval issued to the Township of Oro-Medonte requires a written report detailing compliance with all terms and conditions of the approval to be completed annually. This Report is to be signed by a person designated by Council of the municipality that owns the works and a resolution is to be presented to Council that the Compliance Report has been received. The Compliance Report was due to be completed by March 31, 2005 and available for inspection by any member of the public without charge. ~iiNiJ!~$j~jiii:fjf> ii_ Attached is the Annual Compliance Report for 2004 for the Harbourwood Water Supply System, a copy of which will be submitted to the Ministry of the Environment. This Report is being made available to Council for information and confirmation that Ontario Regulation #170/03 has been complied with by the Township of Oro-Medonte, and identifies any non-compliance issues and Provincial Officer's Orders. .~ IRECOMMENDATIO~{S): ' ' , 1. THAT Report #EES2005-08 be received and adopted. 2. AND THAT Council receives the Annual Compliance Report for 2004 for the Harbourwood Water Supply System. \.. Keith Mathieson ~ THE CORPORATION OFTHE 148 Line 7 S.. Box JOO TOWN 8ft IP Oro, Ontario LOL 2XO Phone (705) 487-2171 fax (705) 487-0133 r!!J~Of7f6echw w\vw.oro-nledonte.G\ March 9, 2005 Ministry of the Environment 54 Cedar Pointe Drive Unit #1201 BARRIE, Ontario L4N 5R7 Re: Harbourwood Water Supply and Treatment System Annual Compliance Report for 2004 Harbourwood Water System supplies 131 homes with water supplied from two (2) ground water source wells. (Well #1 has been abandoned, in accordance with Ontario Regulation #903). Permit to Take Water #2334-5VKS38 for Well #'s 2 and 3 was issued to the Township of Oro-Medonte on January 29, 2004, expiring January 31, 2014, permitting 921.6 m3 , per day, for Well #2 or 921.6 m3, per day, for Well #3. The water treatment plant is to be operated to treat water at a rate not to exceed the maximum flow rate of 915.8 m3 , per day, in total. WATER QUANTITY Schedules have been attached showing the "average daily flow" per month and the "maximum daily flow" per month, and the maximum flow of treated water to the distribution system, as per Section 1.3 of the Certificate of Approval, for the Harbourwood system. At no time during 2004 did the "maximum daily flow" exceed the Permit to Take Water or exceed the maximum flow rate of treated water to the distribution system. The highest "daily flow" for the year from Well #2 occurred on September 5th at 214 m3; Well #3 occurred on June 13th at 314 m3; and to the distribution system, it was 312 m3 on June 13th. New magnetic flow meters have been installed on Well #'s 2 and 3 to record flows from each well, and flow to the distribution system. .. ./2 Page Two ~ Letter to M.O.E. Re: Harbourwood - Annual Compliance Report for 2004 March 9, 2005 To ensure accuracy to within + or - 5% of actual rate of flow within the range of 10% to 100% of the full scale reading of these magnetic flow meters, Summa Engineering Limited calibrated them on September 20, 2004. WATER QUALITY Bacteriological samples were taken weekly from the wells, pumphouse and distribution system, by certified Operators employed by the Township and submitted to Central Ontario Analytical Laboratory in Orillia. Two hundred and sixty (260) samples were tested for "total coliforms" and "fecal coliforms" in 2004. There were no detectable results in 2004. To ensure that the chlorine residual was maintained above 0.2 mg/L in the distribution system, and a free chlorine residual was available in the distribution system, 12% Sodium Hypochlorite was pumped into the system. A total of 600 litres of 12% Sodium Hypochlorite, or an average of 0.57 Uday, was used in the Harbourwood system in 2004. Four hundred and seventeen (417) daily tests for free chlorine in the distribution system were performed by certified Township Operators using a "Hack Pocket Colorimeter" during 2004. These tests were performed to ensure chlorine residual was above 0.2 mg/L in the distribution system. A Prominent Dulcometer analyses the chlorine residual continuously after the 15 minute contact time and is recorded by a data logger. An On-Line ABB 4670 Series Turbidity Meter measures turbidity continuously after the 15 minute contact time and is recorded by a data logger. Raw water turbidity tests are performed monthly by Township staff using a "Hack Pocket Turbidity Meter" and recorded in the daily log book. Quarterly water quality analyses sampling was performed by Geospec Engineering Ltd. in order to satisfy testing parameters for treated water, as per Ontario Regulation #170/03 dated June, 2003. Samples were taken by GeoSpec Engineering Ltd. and forwarded to Lakefield Research Limited for chemical testing. The chemical analysis results did not reveal any health related reportable exceedences during 2004. On September 19, 2002, the Ministry of the Environment issued Amended Certificate of Approval #0500-5DVHLZ for the Harbourwood Water Supply System. On September 8, 2004, the Ministry of the Environment issued Certificate of Approval #7934-64FRUD for the installation of the 100Kw standby power unit. .. ./3 Page Three Letter to M.O.E. - Re: Harbourwood - Annual Compliance Report for 2004 March 9, 2005 "COMPLIANCE WITH TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE CERTIFICATE OF APPROV AL" Under Section 5, Upqradinq Requirements, the Certificate of Approval required the Township to have physical improvements completed, which were completed prior to the end of 2002. "NON-COMPLIANCE WITH TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE CERTIFICATE OF APPROV AL" On June 24, 2004, the Ministry of the Environment conducted an unannounced inspection of the Harbourwood Water System to confirm compliance with current Regulations and to review the Permit to Take Water and Certificate of Approval. From this inspection, Provincial Officer's Order #3765-64DMJW was issued and is attached as Schedule I. To address this Order, the Township prepared and implemented a "Procedure for Reporting Adverse Free Chlorine Residuals" and submitted it to the Barrie Office of the M.O.E. on November 12, 2004. From this inspection, the Ministry also identified five (5) other non-compliance issues and actions required, which are attached as Schedule II. "BEST PRACTICES RECOMMENDATIONS" From the June 24, 2004 inspection, the Ministry, in the interest of continuous improvement, provided the Township of Oro-Medonte with a list of thirty-six (36) suggestions for the operation of the Harbourwood Water System. From this list, the Township of Oro-Medonte has presently completed eighteen (18) of these suggestions. Any further information required with respect to this Compliance Report for the Harbourwood Water System should be directed to the undersigned at (705) 487-2171. Sincerely, Keith Mathieson, C.R.S.I. Director of Engineering and Environmental Services KM/ps Attachments I Sa.s U\A. I \ ~ ent I , ;;; ~ort ! ! @ .'""m"'''''' Provincial Officer's Order Order Number I ~ ' . Environment 3765-64DMJW , * Envitonm'ental Protection Act, R.S.O.1990, c.t 19 (EPA) ! ',Ministere de j " ' ,'- l'Environnemeht Ontario Water Resources Act, R.S.O. 1990, Co Q. 40 (OWRA) Pesticides Act, R.S.O. 1996, c. PH (PA) I Ontario Safe Drinking Water Act, S.O. 2002, c.32 (SDW A) Nutrient Management Act, 200~ 8.0. 2002, c.4 To: The Corporation of the Township of Oro- Medonte PO Box 100 Oro, Ontario, LOL 2XO Canada Site: Lot: 26 ,27, Concession: 7 Oro-Medonte, County of Simcoe Work Ordered 1. Effective immediately, the Operating Authority of the Harbourwood Water System shall rnake the required notifcations as prescribed by Sehedule 16-4 of O. Reg. 170/03 in the event of any observation being made which indicates that improperly disinfected water may have been discharged to the distribution system. 2. Effective immediately, the Operating Authority of the Harbourwood Water System shall perform all corrective actions as prescribed by Schedule 17-2 of O. Reg. 170/03 in the event of any observation being made which indicates that improperly disinfected water may have been discharged to the distribution system. 3. Effective immediately, the Operating Authority of the Harbourwood Water System shall provide all required Notice(s) ofIssue Resolution within seven days of the issue being resolved as prescribed by Sehedu1e 16-9 ofO. Reg. 170/03 in the event of any observation being made which indicates that improperly disinfected water may have been discharged to the distribution system. 4. Effective immediately, the Operating Authority of the Harbourwood Water System shall ensure that abnonnal conditions, departures from normal operating procedures, equipment taken out of or put in service, or any other unusual event are all fully documented including times, actions taken and results achieved in the facility logbooks as prescribed by O. Reg. 435/93, Section 20(5) and O. Reg. 128/04 Section 27(5). Page 1 - NUMBER 3765-64DMJW . 5 c.uEOuLL , \ SECTION 6 SUMMARY OF NON COMPLIANCE ISSUES & ACTIONS REQUIRED 1. The Operating Authority failed to sample and test for chlorine free residual in the distribution system on a daily basis as required by Schedule 7-2(3) ofO. Reg. 170/03. Samples were not taken on June 1, 2003. Action(s) Reauired: None. The Operating Authority monitoredfree chlorine residual in . the distribution system thereafter as required. Order Number: No Order Issued I Compliance Date: N/A 2. The Operating Authority failed to take the necessary corrective actions in response to observed adverse conditions at the facility as required by Schedule 17-2(1),(2), of O. Reg. 170/03. Incidents occurred on September 11 and December 13/14 of 2003, and January 21 and March 27, 2004 in which the chlorine free residual analyzer malfunctioned or recorded a value of less than 0.2 mg/L which is the concentration required by the Harbourwood CofA (0500-5DVHLZ) at the point of entry to the distribution system. Action(s) Reauired: The Operating Authority shall ensure that alarm situations are promptly responded to, documented and appropriate corrective actions are carried out and documented to ensure proper disinfection of drinking water is maintained or restored as soon as possible. Order Number: 3765-64DMJW I Compliance Date: Immediately " Ii tr' " Harbourwood Water Treatment Plant - MOE Inspection 2004/02/24, Page 45 ,,/fjk '? >,~ <:i'" 'i<. ',4' >'1 "f, , , . @ Ontario Ministry of the Environment Drinking Water Inspection Report 3. The Operating Authority failed to report an observation that indicates improperly disinfected water may have been directed to the distribution system as required by Schedule 16-4 ofO. Reg. 170/03. 1ncidents occurred on September 11 and December 13/14 of2003, and January 21 and March 27, 2004 in which the chlorine free residual analyzer malfunctioned or recorded a value of less than 0.2 mg/L which is the concentration required by the Harbourwood CofA (0500-5DVHLZ) at the point of entry to the distribution system. Action{sl Required: The Operating Authority shall report as required if, upon review of the data logger information, or any other observation, it is indicated that the continuous chlorine free residual analyzer malfunctioned or the chlorine free residual fell below 0.2 mg/L at the Harbourwood pumphouse. Order Number: 3765-64DMJW I Compliance Date: 1mmediately . 4. The Operating Authority failed to record the time each Operator spent as Operator in Charge as required by Section 18 ofO. Reg. 435/93. Action{sl ReQuired: None. The Operating Authority now records the amount of time each Operator serves as Operator in Charge. Order Number: No Order Issued I Compliance Date: N/A . Harbourwood Water Treatment Plant - MOE Inspection 2004/02/24, Page 46 ,"", @ Ontario Ministry ofthe Environment . Drinking Water Inspection Report 5. The Operating A uthority has failed to fully comply with Parts 1.2, 1.3, -Performance - in Certificate of ApprovaI0500-5DVHLZ. Flow measuring devices are to be in place at the Harbourwood facility which can measure daily maximum flow rate (peak flow) from each source well into the treatment facility. This capability is currently not in place. Action(s) RelJuired: None. The Municipality is currently installing flow measuring and recording equipment capable of measuring instantaneous flows at the Harbourwood Facility. It is expected this work will be completed in the fall of 2004. Order Number: No Order Issued I Compliance Date: December 31, 2004 6. The Operating Authority has failed to sample sodium in the correct location. Schedule 6-2 of O. Reg. 170/03 requires sodium to be sampled at the point of entry to the distribution system. The sample collected on December 18, 2003 was collected in the distribution . system. Action(s) ReQuired: The Operating Authority will resample for sodium at the point of entry to the distribution system within the next four years. Order Number: No Order Issued I Compliance Date: May 31,2008 7. The Operating Authority failed to install the revised Operations and Maintenance Manual in the Harbourwoodfacility by September 19,2003 as required by Section 3.9 of CofA 0500-5DVHLZ. The manual was installed in late April or early May 2004. Action(s) RelJuired: None. The manual is now completed and installed in the facility. Order Number: No Order Issued I Compliance Date: N/A . Harbourwood Water Treatment Plant - MOE Inspection 2004/02/24, Page 47 """'- . @ Ontario Ministry of the Environment Drinking Water Inspection Report 8. The Operating Authority failed to provide a notice of issue resolution including actions taken and lor results achieved within seven (7) days or otherwise after an adverse condition was resolved as required by Schedule 16-9(1)a,b of O. Reg. 170103. Incidents occurred on September 11 and December 13114 of 2003, and January 21 and March 27, 2004 in which the chlorine free residual analyzer malfunctioned or recorded a value of less than 0.2 mg/L which is the concentration required by the Harbourwood CofA (0500-5DVHLZ) at the point of entry to the distribution system. There were indications on these dates that improperly disinfected water may have been directed to the distribution system which is a reportable event as per Schedule 16-4 of O. Reg. 170103. Action{si Required: The Operating Authority shall provide notice of issue resolution including actions taken and results achieved to the Spills Action Centre and Simcoe County District Health Unit within seven (7) days of an adverse condition being resolved. Order Number: 3765-64DMJW I Compliance Date: Immediately . 9. The Operating Authority failed to fully document any unusual events, departures from normal operating procedures, abnormal conditions and the times these event occurred, the lengths of the events, or the actions taken at the facility as required by Section 20(5) 3, 4, 5 ofO. Reg. 435193. Action{si Required: The Operating Authority shall record in the facility logbook the approximate initial time, time at completion, cause oflfor, actions taken, date, staff member(s) present, results achieved, and location of any operational checks, alarms, tests, repairs, unusual and/or abnormal conditions and/or directions or adjustments made on or within the Harbourwood system. Order Number: 3765-64DMJW I Compliance Date: Immediately A copy of the Provincial Officer's Order and Report can be found in Appendix G. . Harbourwood Water Treatment Plant- MOE Inspection 2004/02/24, Page 48 ~~~ q ~34 ;/;.;p< ~() I~BJ ~) \ti ,,' ~, ~'" '.~w , ',.-.,..~....' ,5" ~~~~2~<<# TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE REPORT DEPT. REPORT NO.: TO: COMMITTEE OF THE PREPARED BY: EES2005-09 WHOLE Keith Mathieson SUBJECT: DEPARTMENT: COUNCIL: Annual Compliance Report - Engineering and Horseshoe Highlands Water Environmental Services C.OFW.: Supply and Treatment - 2004 DATE: MOTION #: March 15, 2005 DATE: R. M. FILE NO.: E05-14518 ~B1\'(0Ie(;I{Q~~: - Section 4 of the Certificate of Approval issued to the Township of Oro-Medonte requires a written report detailing compliance with all terms and conditions of the approval to be completed annually. This Report is to be signed by a person designated by Council of the municipality that owns the works and a resolution is to be presented to Council that the Compliance Report has been received. The Compliance Report was due to be completed by March 31,2005 and available for inspection by any member of the public without charge. I1\,N~jJ~$I$~ i Attached is the Annual Compliance Report for 2004 for the Horseshoe Highlands Water Supply System, a copy of which will be submitted to the Ministry of the Environment. This Report is being made available to Council for information and confirmation that Ontario Regulation #170/03 has been complied with by the Township of Oro-Medonte, and identifies any non-compliance issues. IRECOMMENDATION(S): ' '. - 1. THAT Report #EES2005-09 be received and adopted. 2. AND THAT Council receives the Annual Compliance Report for 2004 for the Horseshoe Highlands Water Supply System. Re'~"bm;"ed Keith Mathieson d THE CORPORATION OF THE 148 Line 7 5., Box 100 TOW N 6Ii IP Ora. Ontario LOL ZXO Phone (705) 487-2! 71 Fax (705) 487,0133 -&;vOf7l6~ www.oro-mecionte.ca March 11, 2005 Ministry of the Environment 54 Cedar Pointe Drive Unit #1201 BARRIE, Ontario L4N 5R7 Re: Horseshoe Highlands Water Supply and Treatment System Annual Compliance Report for 2004 Horseshoe Highlands Water System supplies 501 units with water, which includes the residents of the Highlands and four phases of Carriage Hills. The Highlands Golf Course has been disconnected from this system. The water is supplied from two (2) ground water source wells. Permit to Take Water #0404-5UHQDN for Well #'s 1 and 2 was issued to the Township of Oro-Medonte on January 21, 2004, expiring December 31, 2013, permitting 3,371 m3 for Well #1 and 527 m3 for Well #2 of water taking, per day. The water treatment plant is to be operated to treat water at a rate not to exceed the maximum flow rate of 3,370 m3 per day. WATER QUANTITY Schedules have been attached showing the "average daily flow" per month and the "maximum daily flow" per month, and the maximum flow of treated water to the distribution system, as per Section 4.1 of the Certificate of Approval, for the Horseshoe Highlands system. At no time during 2004 did the "maximum daily flow" exceed the Permit to Take Water or exceed the maximum flow rate of treated water to the distribution system. The highest "daily flow" for the year from Well #1 and to the distribution system occurred on June 13th at 1,375 m3. Well #2 was not in service during 2004. On September 5, 2002, the irrigation system for the Highlands Golf Course was disconnected from the municipal water system. Flows dropped dramatically after this. .. ./2 - Page Two Letter to M.O.E. Re: Horseshoe Highlands - Annual Compliance Report for 2004 March 11. 2005 To ensure accuracy to within + or - 5% of flow within the range of 10% to 100% of the full scale reading of these magnetic flow meters, Summa Engineering Limited calibrated them on September 21, 2004. WATER QUALITY Bacteriological samples were taken weekly from the wells, pumphouse and distribution system, by certified Operators employed by the Township and submitted to Central Ontario Analytical Laboratory in Orillia. Two hundred and forty-nine (249) samples were tested for "total coliforms" and "fecal coliforms" in 2004. There were no detectable results in 2004. To ensure that the chlorine residual was maintained above 0.2 mg/L in the distribution system, and a free chlorine residual was available in the distribution system, 12% Sodium Hypochlorite was pumped into the system. A total of 860 litres of 12% Sodium Hypochlorite, or an average of 2.34 Uday, was used in the Horseshoe Highlands system in 2004. Four hundred and seventeen (417) daily tests for free chlorine in the distribution system were performed by certified Township Operators using a "Hack Pocket Colorimeter" during 2004. These tests were performed to ensure chlorine residual was above 0.2 mg/L in the distribution system. A Prominent Dulcometer analyses the chlorine residual continuously after the 15 minute contact time and is recorded by a data logger. An On-Line ABB 4670 Series Turbidity Meter measures turbidity continuously after the 15 minute contact time and is recorded by a data logger. Raw water turbidity tests are performed monthly by Township staff using a "Hack Pocket Turbidity Meter" and recorded in the daily log book. Quarterly water quality analyses sampling was performed by Geospec Engineering Ltd. in order to satisfy testing parameters for treated water, as per Ontario Regulation #170/03 dated June, 2003. Samples were taken by Geospec Engineering Ltd. and forwarded to Lakefield Research Limited for chemical testing. The results of the treated samples did not reveal any health related reportable exceedences during 2004. On April 23, 2004, the Ministry of the Environment issued Amended Certificate of Approval #3693-5YBP9A for the Horseshoe Highlands Water Supply System, for the installation of pipe work and valves for flow measurement of Well #2. .. ./3 Page Three Letter to M.O.E. Re: Horseshoe Highlands - Annual Compliance Report for 2004 March 11 , 2005 "COMPLIANCE WITH TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE CERTIFICATE OF APPROV AL" Under Section 5, Upqradinq Requirements, of the previous Certificate of Approval, the Township was required to have physical improvements, which were completed in 2003. "NON-COMPLIANCE WITH TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE CERTIFICATE OF APPROV AL" On October 27, 2004, the Ministry of the Environment inspected the Horseshoe Highlands Water System to confirm compliance with current Regulations and to review the Permit to Take Water and Certificate of Approval. From this inspection, the Ministry identified thirteen (13) non-compliances with regulatory requirements and actions required, which are attached as Schedule I. "BEST PRACTICES RECOMMENDATIONS" From the October 27, 2004 inspection, the Ministry, in the interest of continuous improvement, provided the Township of Oro-Medonte with a list of thirty-two (32) suggestions for the operation of the Horseshoe Highlands Water System. From this list, the Township of Oro-Medonte has presently completed seven (7) of these suggestions. Any further information required with respect to this Compliance Report for the Horseshoe Highlands Water System should be directed to the undersigned at (705) 487-2171, Sincerely, ~rp OF ORO.MEDONTE Keith Mathieson, C.R.S.I. Director of Engineering and Environmental Services KM/ps Attachments ; Sc. I I,E/"JU!. 'h \ @Ontario Ministry of the Environment Drinking Water System Inspection Report _.m._ "."__'_'__'. OLO:U:LA-ta-L\(--~ GU.t&MG ~---------- !\lQU c..OM~L.1 A.....c.t:. W 1'1'1-\ . ACTIONS REQUIRED 1 The Operating Authority failed to report orally or in written form an observation that indicates improperly disinfected water may have been directed to the distribution system as required by Schedules 16-4, 16-6 and 16-7 of O. Reg. 170/03. Incidents occurred on October 23 and December 5 of 2003 and May 24 and 25 of 2004 in which the chlorine free residual analyser recorded a value of less than 0.2 mg/L which is the concentration required by the Horseshoe Highlands CofA's (9579-5J4R4W, 7461-5SYRLL and 3693-5YBP9A) at the point of entry to the distribution system. Action(s) Required: The Operating Authority shall report orally and in written format as required if, upon review of the data logger information, or any other observation, it is indicated that the chlorine free residual fell below 0.2 mg/L at the Horseshoe Highlands pumphouse. 2 The Operating Authority failed to take the necessary corrective actions in response to observed adverse conditions at the facility as required by Schedule 17.2(1),(2) of O. Reg. 170/03. Incidents occurred on October 23 and December 5 of 2003 and May 24 and 25 of 2004 in which the chlorine free residual analyser recorded a value of less than 0.2 mg/L which is the concentration required by the Horseshoe Highlands CofA's (9579-5J4R4W, 7461-5SYRLL and 3693-5YBP9A) at the point of entry to the distribution system. Action(s) Required: The Operating Authority shall ensure that alarm situations are promptly responded to, documented and appropriate corrective actions are carried out and documented to ensure proper disinfection of drinking water is maintained or restored as soon as possible. . 3 The Operating Authority failed to provide a notice of issue resolution including actions taken and lor results achieved within seven (7) days or otherwise after an adverse condition was resolved as required by Schedule 16-9(1 )a,b of O. Reg. 170/03. Incidents occurred on October 23 and December 5 of 2003 and May 24 and 25 of 2004 in which the chlorine free residual analyser recorded a value of less than 0.2 mg/L which is the concentration required by the Horseshoe Highlands CofA's (9579-5J4R4W, 7461-5SYRLL and 3693-5YBP9A) at the point of entry to the distribution system. There were indications on these dates that improperly disinfected water may have been directed to the distribution system which is a reportable event as per Schedule 16-4 of O. Reg. 170/03. Action(s) Required: The Operating Authority shall provide notice of issue resolution including actions taken and results achieved to the Spills Action Centre and Simcoe County District Health Unit within seven (7) days of an adverse condition being resolved. 4 The Operating Authority has failed to fully comply with Parts 1.2, 1.3 -Performance - and 2.1(c), (d) - Monitoring and Recording - in Certificate of Approval 9579-5J4R4W, Sections 4.1, 5.1 and 5.2 of CofA's 7461-5SYRLL and 3693-5YBP9A, Table "A" and Section 4.1 of PTTW 0404- 5UHQDN and Schedule"K of PTTW 94-P-3019. Flow measuring devices are to be in place at the Horseshoe Highlands facilities which can measure and record instantaneous flow rates in Umin and pump run times from each source well into the treatment facility. This capability is currently not in place. Action(s) Required: None. The Municipality is currently installing flow measuring and recording equipment capable of measuring instantaneous flows at the Horseshoe Highlands facility. It is expected this work will be completed early in the new year at the latest (2005), . ~ .__......,_...__..__._____ .... __..~____,_..._ ....._...m '_'__'_~___' __,_____.._...,. __ __...._,,_._._.0'.______,._________,___.. .... ___n.'." Report Generated for sauerph on 3/4/2005 Pnvt )~ of A" , -4 @Ontarip + Ministry of the Environment Drinking Water System Inspection Report . m__.____~"".__ ....._..___ ".______.______~___._^__..____._.__ m_..___.__.,_____.__.,,_.._______",,__,._ _m.______.._____.__.__.~_~________.__~.~_.,__._______.... 5 The Operating Authority has failed to sample sodium in the correct location. Schedule 6-2 of O. Reg. 170/03 requires sodium to be sampled at the point of entry to the distribution system. The . sample collected on December 18, 2003 was collected in the distribution system. Action(s) Required: The Operating Authority will resample for sodium at the point of entry to the distribution system by May 31, 2008. 6 The Operating Authority failed to fully document any unusual events, departures from normal operating procedures, abnormal conditions and the times these event occurred, the lengths of the events, or the actions taken at the facility as required by Section 20(5) 3, 4, 5 of O. Reg. 435/93. Action(s) Required: The Operating Authority shall record in the facility logbooks the approximate initial time, time at completion, cause of/for, actions taken, date, staff member(s) present, results achieved, and location of any operational checks, alarms, tests, repairs, unusual and/or abnormal conditions and/or directions or adjustments made on or within the Horseshoe Highlands system. 7 The Operating Authority has failed to collect samples within the time frame prescribed by Schedule 13-6 of O. Reg. 170/03. The prescribed sampling time frame for Trihalomethanes (THM's) is at least once every three months. In 2003, samples were taken on May 28, September 9, and December 18 which were five months and four months apart respectively. In 2004, samples were taken on February 26, May 31 and September 14 which were four and five months apart respectively. Action(s) Required: The Operating Authority will ensure that sampling is conducted not more than three calendar months apart as prescribed. . 8 The Operating Authority has failed to collect samples within the time frame prescribed by Schedule 13-7 of O. Reg. 170/03. The prescribed sampling time frame for nitrates and nitrites is at least once every three months. In 2003, samples were taken on May 28, September 9, and December 18 which were five months and four months apart respectively. In 2004, sampies were taken on February 26, May 31 and September 14 which were four and five months apart respectively. Action(s) Required: The Operating Authority will ensure that sampling is conducted not more than three calendar months apart as prescribed. 9 The Operating Authority has failed to fully comply with Certificate of Approval 9579-5J4R4W. The Municipality was required to have all required upgrades completed by July 1, 2003. An inspection on September 2, 2004 revealed that the casing for Well 1 was not raised to O. Reg. 903/90 standards (30cm above the bottom of the pit at that time, now 40 em above ground surface level), a shielded air vent was not installed on Well 1 and the Well 1 air vent was not raised to within 0.15 metres of the top of the well pit in which the well is situated. Action(s) Required: None. The issuance of CofA 7461-5SYRLL on November 12, 2003 revoked these requirements and the subsequent issuance of CofA 3693-5YBP9A did not reinstate these requirements. 10 The Operating Authority has failed to fully comply with Part 4,1(c)i, Ii - Compliance Report - in Certificate of Approval 9579-5J4R4W and Section 11(6)e in O. Reg. 170/03. The Municipality was required to state any major repair expenses during the year and state any non-compliance issues with the CofA or otherwise, known during the year. The Annual Compliance Report for . 2003 states that all CofA required upgrades were completed by the prescribed date of July 1, 2003. The required upgrades to Well 1 were not completed and have not been completed. Report Generated for sauerph on 3/4/2005 Page 34 of 4(J ., .' @.Ontario Ministry of the Environment Drinking Water System Inspection Report _____.__.____.__. .n. __.,____.,__._,_._.__'m_______._..._,_.,_._.___~m____..._____.__._______"___"__ .>.______...m._.._.___.__n__..n___._______.______..__..-..-.---... . Action(s) Required: The Municipality no longer has to complete those CofA required upgrades at the Horseshoe Highlands Well 1 facility due to the subsequent issuance of CofA amendments which removed the upgrading requirements. However, The Municipality shall ensure that all information items prescribed by Section 11(6) of O. Reg. 170103 are included in future annual reports and are accurately reported. 11 The Operating Authority failed to ensure that a well was not constructed within the minimum separation distance allowed between it and a sewage system as prescribed by the Building Code (0. Reg. 403/97) as referred to by O. Reg. 903/90 Section 12(1). This Section of O. Reg. 903/90 and Sections 8.2.1.6B and 8.2.1.6C of O. Reg. 403/97 state that a well cannot be constructed within 15m of a sewage tank or sewage distribution piping. The sewage tank adjacent to Well 2 appears to be within 14m, and the sewage distribution piping from this tank is within 9m of Well 2. Action(s) Required: The Municipality shall revise the existing remedial action plans and contingency plan procedures to include potential sewage spills around the wells in this system. These plans shall include but not be limited to: making cleanup and remediation equipment and supplies available, procedures for responding to and reporting of sewage spills. overflows or leaks, procedures for the shut down of the well, remediation or abandonment of the well if required, monitoring of the sewage tank and system integrity and procedures to correct problems if discovered. 12 The Operating Authority failed to ensure that a well casing extended the minimum prescribed distance above the surrounding ground surface. Section 13(14) of O. Reg. 903/90 now prescribes that the casing must extend at least 40 cm above the highest point of the ground surface within three metres radially. Well #1 was constructed within a 2.7m deep well pit and the casing extends only approximately 10cm above the concrete floor of this structure. This well . was constructed in 1988 and predates the current Well Regulation. A requirement to raise the casing to the then required height (30cm above the floor) was included in CofA 9579-5J4R4W issued on February 7, 2003. Action(s) Required: None. As the well predates legislation and the requirement to raise the casing was revoked by CofA 7461-5SYRLL, the Municipality is in compliance with their current CofA. 13 The Operating Authority failed to ensure that a shielded and screened well vent extends above the covering of a well pit. Sections 18(1)(b,i) and 18(1 )(d) of O. Reg. 903/90 prescribe that a well vent must be of sufficient length to extend above the covering of a well pit and that it must be adequately screened and shielded to prevent entry of foreign materials into the well. Well #1 was constructed within a 2.7m deep well pit and the unscreened, unshielded well vent extends only approximately 50cm above the concrete floor of this structure. This well was constructed in 1988 and predates the current Well Regulation. A requirement to screen and shield the vent and to raise the vent to the then required height (0.15cm below the top of the well pit) was included in CofA 9579-5J4R4W issued on February 7,2003. Action(s) Required: None. As the well predates legislation and the requirement to raise, screen and shield the vent was revoked by CofA 7461-5SYRLL, the Municipality is in compliance with their current CofA. . Report Generated for sauerph on 3/4/2005 Page 35 of 40 -4~ TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE REPORT DEPT. REPORT NO.: TO: COMMITTEE OF THE PREPARED BY: EES2005-10 WHOLE Keith Mathieson SUBJECT: DEPARTMENT: COUNCIL: Annual Compliance Report - Engineering and Lake Simcoe Regional Airport Environmental Services C.OFW.: Water Supply and Treatment - 2004 DATE: MOTION #: March 15, 2005 DATE: R. M. FILE NO.: E05-14518 litJ~~f{1~j{~~~:/ '- Section 4 of the Certificate of Approval issued to the Township of Oro-Medonte requires a written report detailing compliance with all terms and conditions of the approval to be completed annually. This Report is to be signed by a person designated by Council of the municipality that owns the works and a resolution is to be presented to Council that the Compliance Report has been received. The Compliance Report was due to be completed by March 31, 2005 and available for inspection by any member of the public without charge. ~~N~~"~I~; - Attached is the Annual Compliance Report for 2004 for the Lake Simcoe Regional Airport Water Supply System, a copy of which will be submitted to the Ministry of the Environment. This Report is being made available to Council for information and confirmation that Ontario Regulation #170/03 has been complied with by the Township of Oro-Medonte, on behalf of the Lake Simcoe Regional Airport Commission. Lake Simcoe Regional Airport was not inspected by the Ministry of the Environment during 2004, as they feel it is not within their jurisdiction. ~\J6 ~RECOMMENDATION(S): , 1. THAT Report #EES2005-1 0 be received and adopted. 2. AND THAT Council receives the Annual Compliance Report for 2004 for the Lake Simcoe Regional Airport Water Supply System. ,......, R~ect!iJlly submitted, I f / 0:t/ Keith Mathieson c+J I ./ J j / THE CORPORATION OFTHE 148 Line 7 S., Box 100 TOW N 8ft IP Ora, Ontario LOL 2XO Phone (705) 487,2171 fax (705) 487-0133 (!j~OfJ#6eaivz/e WWW,oro-medonte,ca March 9, 2005 Ministry of the Environment 54 Cedar Pointe Drive Unit #1201 BARRIE, Ontario L4N 5R7 Re: Lake Simcoe Regional Airport Water Supply and Treatment System Annual Compliance Report for 2004 Lake Simcoe Regional Airport (L.S.A.A.) Water System supplies the Airport terminal building and two hangers with water from two (2) ground water source wells. Permit to Take Water #94-P-3027, issued to the Oro-Barrie-Orillia Regional Airport Commission, authorizes the withdrawal of water, expiring March 31, 2004 for Well #2 and Well #3. A new Permit to Take Water #7458-5VKLNL was issued on January 29, 2004, expiring January 31, 2014. The withdrawal of water is not to exceed a combined maximum of 36 m3 per day. WATER QUANTITY Schedules have been attached showing the "average daily flow" per month and the "maximum daily flow" per month, and the maximum flow of treated water to the distribution system, as per Section 4.1 of the Certificate of Approval, for the L.S.A.A. system. On September 5, 2004, the Permit to Take Water was exceeded during the filling of the fire reservoir tank at the new Weatherwise hanger. The highest "daily flow" for the year from Well #2 occurred on September 5th at 26 m3; Well #3 occurred on September 5th at 24 m3; and to the distribution system, it was 50 m3 on September 5th. New magnetic flow meters were installed on Well #'s 2 and 3 to record flows from the wells and to the distribution system. To ensure accuracy to within + or - 5% of actual rate of flow within the range of 10% to 100% of the full scale reading of these magnetic flow meters, Summa Engineering Limited calibrated them on September 22, 2004. .. ./2 + Page Two Letter to M.O.E. Re: Lake Simcoe Regional Airport - Annual Compliance Report for 2004 March 9. 2005 WATER QUALITY Bacteriological samples were taken weekly from the wells, pumphouse and distribution system, by certified Operators employed by the Township and submitted to Central Ontario Analytical Laboratory in Orillia. Two hundred and sixty-two (262) samples were tested for "total coliforms" and "fecal coliforms", and one hundred and four (104) tests for HPC in 2004. There were no detectable results in 2004. To ensure that the chlorine residual was maintained above 0.2 mg/L in the distribution system, and a free chlorine residual was available in the distribution system, 12% Sodium Hypochlorite was pumped into the system. A total of 40 litres of 12% Sodium Hypochlorite, or an average of 0.07 Uday, was used in the L.S.R.A. system in 2004. Four hundred and nineteen (419) daily tests for free chlorine in the distribution system were performed by certified Township Operators using a "Hack Pocket Colorimeter" during 2004. These tests were performed to ensure chlorine residual was above 0.2 mg/L in the distribution system. A Prominent Dulcometer analyses the chlorine residual continuously after the 15 minute contact time and is recorded by a data logger. An On-Line ABB 4670 Series Turbidity Meter measures turbidity continuously after the 15 minute contact time and is recorded by a data logger. Raw water turbidity tests are performed monthly by Township staff using a "Hack Pocket Turbidity Meter" and recorded in the daily log book. Quarterly water quality analyses sampling was performed by Geospec Engineering Ltd. in order to satisfy testing parameters for treated water, as per Ontario Regulation #170/03 dated June, 2003. Samples were taken by Geospec Engineering Ltd. and forwarded to Lakefield Research Limited for chemical testing. The results of the treated samples did not reveal any health related reportable exceedences during 2004. On November 12, 2003, the Ministry of the Environment issued Amended Certificate of Approval #0644-5T6RGB for the L.S.RA Water Supply System. .. ./3 ~ Page Three Letter to M.O.E. Re: Lake Simcoe Regional Airport - Annual Compliance Report for 2004 March 9, 2005 On June 15, 2004, the Ministry of the Environment issued Certificate of Approval #4676- 5ZXKLS for the installation of the standby power unit The Ministry of the Environment did not inspect the L.S.A.A. Water Supply System in 2004. "COMPLIANCE WITH TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE CERTIFICATE OF APPROV AL" Under Section 5, Upqradinq Requirements, the Certificate of Approval required the Township to have physical improvements (a list of which may be received upon request) completed by December 31, 2002. The Tender for these upgrades was awarded to Midland Mechanical in August, 2002. All upgrades were completed prior to December 31,2002. "NON-COMPLIANCE WITH TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL" The L.S.R.A. Water Supply System was not inspected in 2004. Any further information required with respect to this Compliance Report for the Lake Simcoe Regional Airport Water System should be directed to the undersigned at (705) 487-2171. Sincerely, TO~ OF ORO-MEDONTE Keith Mathieson, C.R.S.I. Director of Engineering and Environmental Services KM/ps Attachments ~ TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE REPORT DEPT. REPORT NO.: TO: COMMITTEE OF THE PREPARED BY: EES2005-11 WHOLE Keith Mathieson SUBJECT: DEPARTMENT: COUNCIL: Annual Compliance Report - Engineering and Maplewood Water Supply Environmental Services C.OFW.: and Treatment - 2004 DATE: MOTION #: March 15, 2005 DATE: R. M. FILE NO.: E05-14518 ~tJ~Cl{(;!I{()PNI): - Section 4 of the Certificate of Approval issued to the Township of Oro-Medonte requires a written report detailing compliance with all terms and conditions of the approval to be completed annually. This Report is to be signed by a person designated by Council of the municipality that owns the works and a resolution is to be presented to Council that the Compliance Report has been received. The Compliance Report was due to be completed by March 31, 2005 and available for inspection by any member of the public without charge. tA.NA.~}r$~$: - Attached is the Annual Compliance Report for 2004 for the Maplewood Water Supply System, a copy of which will be submitted to the Ministry of the Environment. This Report is being made available to Council for information and confirmation that Ontario Regulation #170/03 has been complied with by the Township of Oro-Medonte, and identifies any non-compliance issues and Provincial Officer's Orders. ~RECOMMENDATION(S): - 1. THAT Report #EES2005-11 be received and adopted. 2. AND THAT Council receives the Annual Compliance Report for 2004 for the Maplewood Water Supply System. Re~':submitted, W Keith Mathieson (\~ I I ~ THE CORPORATION OF THE 148 Line 7 S.. Box 100 TOWN8Ii IP Ora, Ontario LOL 2XO Phone (705) 487~2! 7 J Fax (7051487,0133 r!!JmOF7I6~t/e www.oro-medonte.ca March 9, 2005 Ministry of the Environment 54 Cedar Pointe Drive Unit #1201 BARRIE, Ontario L4N 5R7 Re: Maplewood Water Supply and Treatment System Annual Compliance Report for 2004 Maplewood Water System supplies 47 homes with water from one (1) ground water source well. Permit to Take Water #02-P-1314, issued to the Township of Oro-Medonte for Well #1, authorizes the withdrawal of water, expiring October 31,2012. The withdrawal of water is not to exceed 163 m3 per day. Certificate of Approval #1546-5E4L9F, Section 1.3, requires that the water treatment plant is operated to treat water at a rate not to exceed the maximum flow rate of 163.7 m3 per day. WATER QUANTITY Schedules have been attached showing the "average daily flow" per month and the "maximum daily flow" per month, and the maximum flow of treated water to the distribution system for the Maplewood system. At no time during 2004 did the "maximum daily flow" exceed the Permit to Take Water or exceed the maximum flow rate of treated water to the distribution system. The highest "daily flow" for the year from Well #1 occurred on July 26th at 76 m3, and to the distribution system, it was 150 m3 on June 13th. New magnetic flow meters were installed to measure flow from Well #1, and flow to the distribution system. .. ./2 Page Two ~ Letter to M.O.E. Re: Maplewood - Annual Compliance Report for 2004 March 9, 2005 To ensure accuracy to within + or - 5% of flow within the range of 10% to 100% of the full scale reading of these magnetic flow meters, Summa Engineering Limited calibrated them on September 20, 2004. WATER QUALITY Bacteriological samples were taken weekly from the well, pumphouse and distribution system, by certified Operators employed by the Township and submitted to Central Ontario Analytical Laboratory in OrilJia. Two hundred and ten (210) samples Were tested for "total coliforms" and "fecal coliforms", and one hundred and nine (109) tests for HPC in 2004. There were no detectable results in 2004. To ensure that the chlorine residual was maintained above 0.2 mg/L in the distribution system, and a free chlorine residual was avaifable in the distribution system, 12% Sodium Hypochlorite was pumped into the system. A total of 205 litres of 12% Sodium Hypochlorite, or an average of 0.59 Uday, was used in the Maplewood system in 2004. Four hundred and seventeen (417) daily tests for free chlorine in the distribution system were performed by certified Township Operators using a "Hack Pocket Colorimeter" during 2004. These tests were performed to ensure chlorine residual was above 0.2 mg/L in the distribution system. A Prominent Dulcometer analyses the chlorine residual continuously after the 15 minute contact time and is recorded by a data logger. An On-Line ASS 4670 Series Turbidity Meter measures turbidity continuously after the 15 minute contact time and is recorded by a data logger. Raw water turbidity tests are performed monthly by Township staff using a "Hack Pocket Turbidity Meter" and recorded in the daily log book. Quarterly water quality analyses sampling was performed by Geospec Engineering Ltd. in order to satisfy testing parameters for treated water, as per Ontario Regulation #170/03 dated June, 2003. Samples were taken by Geospec Engineering Ltd. and forwarded to Lakefield Research Limited for chemical testing. The chemical analysis results did not reveal any health related reportable exceedences during 2004. On September 23, 2002, the Ministry of the Environment issued Amended Certificate of Approval #1546-5E4L9F for the Maplewood Water Supply System. On August 5, 2004, the Ministry of the Environment issued Certificate of Approval #9306-62LPAJ for the installation of the standby power unit. .. ./3 Page Three Letter to M.O.E. Re: Maplewood - Annual Compliance Report for 2004 March 9, 2005 "COMPLIANCE WITH TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL" Under Section 5, Uparadina Reauirements, the Certificate of Approval required the Township to have physical improvements (a list of which may be received upon request) completed by June 30, 2003. The final improvement was completed on April 2, 2004 (all required upgrades have been completed). "NON-COMPLIANCE WITH TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE CERTIFICATE OF APPROV AL" On August 1 0, 2004, the Ministry of the Environment conducted an unannounced inspection of the Maplewood Water System to confirm compliance with current Regulations and to review the Permit to Take Water and Certificate of Approval. From this inspection, Provincial Officer's Order #8434-66ZS7Z was issued and is attached as Schedule I. The required additional flow meter was installed by Township staff on January 20, 2005 and written notification was sent to the M.O.E. Barrie Office on January 20, 2005 to satisfy this Order. From this inspection, fourteen (14) non-compliances with regulatory requirements and actions required were identified and are attached as Schedule II. "BEST PRACTICES RECOMMENDATIONS" From the August 10, 2004 inspection, the Ministry, in the interest of continuous improvement, provided the Township of Oro-Medonte with a list of thirty-eight (38) suggestions for the operation of the Maplewood Water System. From this list, the Township of Oro-Medonte has presently completed fourteen (14) of these suggestions. Any further information required with respect to this Compliance Report for the Maplewood Water System should be directed to the undersigned at (705) 487-2171. Sincerely, T~HIP OF ORD-MEOONTE Kel athleson, C.R.S.I. Director of Engineering and Environmental Services KM/ps Attachments Sc.uE.Cu&.L t . @..."MinistryOfthe..",orderNumber Environment PrOVInCIal Officer s Order 8434-66Z87Z 'CO M',' . d EnVironmental Protection Act, R.S.O.199Q, c.E 19 (EPA) ...'1. .... mlstere e Ontario Water Resources Ac4 R.S.O.1990, c. O. 40 (OWRA) l'Env;ronnement Pesticides Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. Pll (P A) o nta ri 0 Sare Drinldng Water Act, S.Q. 2002, c.32 (SDW A) Nutrient Management Act, 2002, 8.0. 2002, c.4 To: The Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte PO Box 100 Oro, Ontario, LOL 2XO Canada Site: Lot: 20, 21, Concession: 1 Oro- Medonte, County of Simcoe Work Ordered . I, The Operating Authority of the Maplewood Wate'r System shall ensure that the treated water flow measuring device(s) at the Maplewood facility provides an accurate representation of the flow directed to the distribution system as prescribed by Certificate of Approval (1546-5E4L9F) by February 28,2005, or, submit a complete application to amend Certificate of Approval 1546-5E4L9F to the Director of Environmental Licencing and Approvals Branch, 2 St. Clair Avenue West, Toronto to have the requirement for a treated water flow meter removed ftorn Certificate of Approval I 546-5E4L9F for the Maplewood Water System. A copy of this Provincial Officer Order shall be included with the application. The application shall include the appropriate fees and be complete to the satisfaction of the Director. Submit the application by February 15, 2005. 2. Submit written notice to the undersigned that the work required by option I of Work Ordered Item #1 has been completed or provide a copy of the application required by option 2 of Work Ordered Item #1 to the undersigned by March 15, 2005. A. While this Order is in effect, a copy or copies of this order shall be posted in a conspicuous place. . B. While this Order is in effect, report in writing, to the District or Area office, any significant Page 1 - NUMBER 8434-66Z512 . changes of operation, emission, ownership, tenancy or other legal status of the facility or operation. This Order is being issued for the reasons set out in the annexed Provincial Officers Report which forms part of this Order. Issued at Oro- Medonte this 17th day of January, 2005. 1ilJL---, Phillip Sauer. 10 Badge No: 10 Barrie District Office Tel: (705) 739-6441 . . Page 2 - NUMBER 8434-66ZS7Z . APPEALIREVIEW INFORMATION REQ1JEST FOR REVIEW You may request that this order be reviewed by the Director. Your request must be made in 'Writing (or ora]ly with vnitten confmnation) within seven days of service of this order and sent by mail or fax to the Director at the address below. In the 'Written request or written confirmation yoli must, . specify the portions of this order that you wish to be reviewed; . incJude any submissions to be considered by the Director with respect to issuance of the order to you or any other person and with respect to the contents of the order; . apply for a slay of !his order, if necessary; and provide an address for service by one of !he fo!lowing means: Lman 2. fax The Director may confirm, alter or revoke this order. If this order is revoked by the Director, you will be notified in writing. If this order is confinned or amended by order of the Director, the Director's order will be served upon you. The Director's order will include instructions for requiring a hearing before the Environmental Review Tribunal. DEEMED CONFIRMATION OF TillS ORDER If you do not receive ora] or written notice of the Director's decision within seven days of receipt of your request, this order is deemed to be confmned by order of the Director and deemed to be served upon you. You may require a hearing before the En:vironmental Review Tribunal if, within 15 days of service of the confinning order deemed to have been made by the Director, you serve written notice of your appeal on the Environmental Review Tribunal and the Director. Your notice must state the portions of the order for which a heariDg is required and the grounds on which you intend to rely at the bearing. Except by leave of the Environmental Review Tribunal, you are not entitled to appeal a portion of the order or to rely on grounds of appeal that are not sta.ted in the notice requiring the hearing. Unless stayed by the EnvironmentaJ Review Tribunal. the order is effective from the date of service. . Written notice requiring a hearing must be served personally or by mail upon: Tbe Secretary and Director (provincial Officer Orders) Environmental Review Tribunal Ministry of the Environment P.O. Box 2382 Barrie District Office 2300 Yonge Streel, Suite 120! 1203-54 Cedar Poinle Dr Toronto, ON M4P 1E4 Barrie ON IAN 5R 7 Fax: (705)739-6440 Te1: (705)739-6441 VVhere service is made by mail, it is deemed to be made on the fIfth day after the date of mailing and the time for requiring a hearing is not extended by choosing service by mail. Further infonnarion on the Environmental Review Tribunal's requirements for an appeal can be obtained directly from the TribunaJ by: Tel: (416) 314-4600 Fax: (4]6) 3!4-4506 www.ert.Qov.on.ca FOR YOUR INFORMA noN . Un)ess stayed by the Director or the Environmental Review Tribunal> this order is effective from the date of service. Non-compliance with the requirements of this order constitutes an offence. . The requirements of thjs order are minimum requirements only and do not relieve you from complying with the following: . any app1icab!e federaJ1egis!ation; . any appHcable provincial requirements that are not addressed in the order; and . any applicable municipal law. . The requirements of this order are severable. If any requirement of this order or the application of any requirement to any circumstance is held invalid, the application of such requirement to other circumstances and the remainder of the order are not affected. . Further orders may be issued in accordance with the legislation as circumstances require. . The procedures to request a review by the Director and other information provided above are intended as a guide. The . legislation should be consulted for additional details and accurate reference. Page 3 - NUMBER 8434-66ZS7Z , SClMbu\E. \\ @ Ontario Ministry of the Environment Drinking Water System Inspection Report ..._._.___.__,.___~_,._.._,_._,,________.___."_.._"..,_.._.' .__m...._ m._'_. ... ... ...__._.. . .....a m.__.'_...._..._._.._._._ mo. ..._......__. .....om__. . ......__._.___ .. ......_.om_m._______._.______..__.__....__......._m......_ . ACTIONS REQUIRED 1 The Operating Authority failed to sample and test for chlorine free residual in the distribution system on a daily basis as required by Schedule 7-2(3) of O. Reg. 170/03. Samples were not taken on June 1, 2003 and April 2, 2004. Action(s) Required: None. The Operating Authority monitored free chlorine residual in the distribution system thereafter as required. 2 The Operating Authority failed to report orally or in written form an observation that indicates improperly disinfected water may have been directed to the distribution system as required by Schedules 16-4, 16-6 and 16-7 of O. Reg. 170/03. Incidents occurred on July 8, 9 and August 8 of 2003, and March 28, April 15, 16, May 11, 12, 25, 26, 27, and 29, of 2004 in which the chlorine free residual analyzer recorded a value of less than 0.2 mg/L which is the concentration required by the Maplewood CofA (1546-5E4L9F) at the point of entry to the distribution system. Action(s) Required: The Operating Authority shall report orally and in written format as required if, upon review of the data logger information, or any other observation, it is indicated that the chlorine free residual fell below 0.2 mg/L at the Maplewood pumphouse. 3 The Operating Authority failed to take the necessary corrective actions in response to observed adverse conditions at the facility as required by Schedule 18-2(1 ),(2),(3) of O. Reg. 170/03. Incidents occurred on JUly 8, 9 and August 8 of 2003, and March 28, April 15, 16, May 11, 12, 25, 26, 27, and 29 of 2004 in which the chlorine free residual analyzer recorded a value of less than 0.2 mg/L which is the concentration required by the Maplewood CofA (1546-5E4L9F) at the . point of entry to the distribution system. Action(s) Required: The Operating Authority shall ensure lhat alarm situations are promptly responded to, documenled and appropriate corrective actions are carried out and documented to ensure proper disinfection of drinking water is maintained or restored as soon as possible. 4 The Operating Authority failed to provide a notice of issue resolution including actions taken and lor results achieved within seven (7) days or otherwise after an adverse condition was resolved as required by Schedule 16-9(1 )a,b of O. Reg. 170/03. Incidents occurred on July 8, 9 and August 8 of 2003, and March 28, April 15, 16, May 11, 12,25,26,27, and 29 of 2004 in which the chlorine free residual analyzer recorded a value of less than 0.2 mglL which is the concentration required by the Maplewood CofA (1546-5E4L9F) at the point of entry to the distribution system. There were indications on these dates that improperly disinfected water may have been directed to the distribution system which is a reportable event as per Schedule 16-4 of O. Reg. 170/03. ACtion(s) Required: The Operating Authority shall provide notice of issue resolution including actions taken and results achieved to the Spills Action Centre and Simcoe' County District Health Unit within seven (7) days of an adverse condition being resolved. . __._._.........____.__,_............ ""H .... ...._. _.___ _"U"_'_n'_'__'____'_ -....--.'-.-.-..-.--- ._m_____ -.-----.. ...'.- .--....--,,-.-- .'.--.--- ---_.'-- Report Generated for sauerph on 1/17/2005 Page 29 of36 ~ tG7\ 0 . Ministry of the Environment ~ ntano Drinking Water System Inspection Report .._..__..... ..__...__...._..___......_____..____..........._..__......._n.__.......__,__._ ...._...._.~'..'....m.._...._..__.._ .m .....m........_ ..............__..__........._.._....___............._.._m....__.........,._.._'.....m__._~_.,.._...._._,.....____..._.._......__.__. ..-........... 5 The Operating Authority has failed to fully comply with Parts 1.2, -Performance - and 2.1(c), (d)- . Monitoring and Recording - in Certificate of Approval 1546-5E4L9F and Schedule "A" of PTIW 02"P-1314. Flow measuring devices are to be in place at the Maplewood facility which can measure and record instantaneous flow rates in Umin and pump run times from each source well into the treatment facility. This capability is currently not in place. Action(s) Required: None. The Municipality is currently installing flow measuring and recording equipment capable of measuring instantaneous flows at the Maplewood facility. It is expected this work will be completed in early 2005. 6 The Operating Authority has failed to fully comply with Part 2.1 a(lI) - Monitoring and Recording - in Certificate of Approval 1546-5E4L9F. Flow measuring devices are to be in place at the , Maplewood facility which can measure and record instantaneous flow rates in Umin of treated water supplied to the distribution system. Currently, the treated water flow meter records flows to the distribution system, water wasted to the outside of the facility and any water returned to the reservoir through the pressure relief valve. Action(s) Required: The Operatin9 Authority shall install the treated water flow meter in such a manner that only water entering the distribution system is measured. This work shall be completed by February 28, .2005. Provincial Officer's Order #8434-662S72 has been issued for this item. 7 The Operating Authority has failed to sample sodium in the correct location. Schedule 6-2 of O. Reg. 170/03 requires sodium to be sampled at the point of entry to the distribution system. The sample collected on December 18, 2003 was collected in the distribution system. . Action(s) Required: The Operating Authority will resample for sodium at the point of entry to the distribution system by May 31,2008. 8 The Operating Authority failed to fully document any unusual events, departures from normal operating procedures, abnormal conditions and the times these event occurred, the lengths of the events, or the actions taken at the facility as required by Section 20(5) 3, 4, 5 of O. Reg. 435/93. Action(s) Required: The Operating Authority shall record in the facility logbooks the approximate initial time, time at completion, cause of/for, actions taken, date, staff member(s) present, results achieved, and location of any operational checks, alarms, tests, repairs, unusual andlor abnormal conditions and/or directions or adjustments made on or within the Maplewood system. 9 The Operating Authority has failed to sample for raw water turbidity once per month before any treatment. Schedule 7-3 of O. Reg. 170103 requires raw water turbidity to be taken from a point before any treatment and analyzed immediately once per month if the system obtains water from a ground water source. There is no record of raw water turbidity having been analyzed for the months of June, July and August of 2003. Action(s) Required: None. The Operating Authority is now collecting and analysing a raw water turbidity sample monthly. . ._,__..__.._..__..,__.._.___...,__._....,....,,__...__.__'~..._... ....__.._..____.,........__.__.._~_._ ............ .,_,n_..__' ...._m_n__ ...._n.. m.._._....___........._._...._ n. . ..... ........_.. ....m.........._. ....... .... ....- .". . .-..... Report Generated for sauerph on 1/17/2005 Page 30 of 36 @ 0 . Ministry of the Environment ,.,!."..._~!~~I.~_. ",.'...,."",..,.......,., ..""", .'", ,.,~r~~ki~~~~~~r~!.':~~~.'I1.':~~~tio.n~~~~rt . 10 The Operating Authority has failed to collect samples within the time frame prescribed by Schedule 13.6 of O. Reg. 170103. The prescribed sampling time frame for Trihalomethanes (THM's) is at least once every three months. In 2003, samples were taken on May 28, September g, and December 18 which were five months and four months apart respectively. In 2004, samples were taken on February 26 and May 31 which were four months apart. Action(s) Required: The Operating Authority will ensure that sampling is conducted not more than three calendar months apart as prescribed. The sampling program has been modified to meet this requirement. 11 The Operating Authority has failed to collect samples within the time frame prescribed by Schedule 13-7 of O. Reg. 170103. The prescribed sampling time frame for nitrates and nitrites is at least once every three months. In 2003, samples were taken on May 28, September 9, and December 18 which were five months and four months apart respectively. In 2004, samples were taken on February 26 and May 31 which were four months apart. Action(s) Required: The Operating Authority will ensure that sampling is conducted not more than three calendar months apart as prescribed. The sampling program has been modified to mE>et this requirement. 12 The Operating Authority has failed to fully comply with Certificate of Approval 1546-5E4L9F. The Municipality was required to have all required upgrades completed by June 30, 2003. Documents revealed that the High Lift Pump lockout controls were only installed on April 2, 2004. . Action(s) Required: None. The Municipality has now completed all of the CofA required upgrades at the Maplewood facility. 13 The Operating Authority has failed to fully comply with Part 4.1 (c)i, Ii - Compliance Report - in Certificate of Approval 1546-5E4L9F and Section 11(6)e in O. Reg. 170103. The Municipality was required to state and major repair expenses during the year and state any non-compliance issues known during lhe year. The Annual Compliance Report for 2003 states that all CofA required upgrades were completed by the prescribed date of June 30, 2003. The required upgrades were completed on April 2, 2004. Action(s) RE>quired: The Municipality has now completed all of the CofA required upgrades at the Maplewood facility but shall ensure that all information items prescribed by Section 11 (6) of O. Reg. 170103 are included in future annual reports. 14 The Operating Authority has failE>d to fully comply with Schedule 11-2 (2c) which requires that at least one distribution sample be taken each week and tesled for heterotrophic plate count. Bacteriological samplE>s were taken from the distribution system on the dates of June 2, 11 and 17 of 2003 but were not tested for heterotrophic plate count as required. Action(s) Required: None. The Operating Authority now lests all distribution samples collected from this system for heterotrophic plate count. . .... .' "-~-_._.._.-----.._-.._".- """ ._...___'.... h',_ .___,__________..m..._"'"_... ______.."._.,_, ______._......m.._.___.....-.______. .....-".---. Report Generated for sauerph on 1/17/2005 Page 31 of36 ~~~ 'i"2:-:R1~ ~~"% )No - '. ... .....', ,,,,' -@ !,'f \__~ _ ~,_ l~ U70'CC=) , ",' S::c:c'..# ~3:'i~ TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE REPORT DEPT. REPORT NO.: TO: COMMITTEE OF THE PREPARED BY: EES2005-12 WHOLE Keith Mathieson SUBJECT: DEPARTMENT: COUNCIL: Annual Compliance Report - Engineering and Medonte Hills Water Supply Environmental Services C. OF W.: and Treatment - 2004 DATE: MOTION #: March 15, 2005 DATE: R. M. FILE NO.: E05-14518 ~~~~~G:~~\'.iNJ:j;md" Section 4 of the Certificate of Approval issued to the Township of Oro-Medonte requires a written report detailing compliance with all terms and conditions of the approval to be completed annually. This Report is to be signed by a person designated by Council of the municipality that owns the works and a resolution is to be presented to Council that the Compliance Report has been received. The Compliance Report was due to be completed by March 31,2005 and available for inspection by any member of the public without charge. 1~l'1~tB'\"$t$; , Attached is the Annual Compliance Report for 2004 for the Medonte Hills Water Supply System, a copy of which will be submitted to the Ministry of the Environment. This Report is being made available to Council for information and confirmation that Ontario Regulation #170/03 has been complied with by the Township of Oro-Medonte, and identifies any non-compliance issues. I RECOMMENDA TION(S): .;"..,.,>.<>".,;.,.".;.,.;,...>;.;:-:,.....,>:.......c., - ....... .......<.<>......,."..(/. 1. THAT Report #EES2005-12 be received and adopted. 2. AND THAT Council receives the Annual Compliance Report for 2004 for the Medonte Hills Water Supply System. Resp~ submitted, /' j / \ / / \ / K~ieson THE CORPORATION OFTHE 148 Line 7 S.. Box 100 TO WN 8Ii IP Oro. Ontario LOL 2XO Phone (705) 487-2171 fax 1705) 487,0133 r!!J~OfJ#6eafu/e www.oro-medonte.ca March 9, 2005 Ministry of the Environment 54 Cedar Pointe Drive Unit #1201 BARRIE, Ontario L4N 5R7 Re: Medonte Hills Water Supply and Treatment System Annual Compliance Report for 2004 Medonte Hills Water System supplies 136 homes with water from two (2) ground water source wells. Permit to Take Water #92-P-3029 was issued to the Township of Oro-Medonte authorizing the withdrawal of water, expiring December 15, 2011, for Well #1 and Well #2. The withdrawal of water is not to exceed 327 m3from Well #1 and 393 m3 from Well #2 per day. The water treatment plant is to be operated to treat water at a rate not to exceed the maximum flow rate of 393 m3, per day, as per Section 1.4 of the Certificate of Approval. WATER QUANTITY Schedules have been attached showing the "average daily flow" per month and the "maximum daily flow" per month, and the maximum flow of treated water to the distribution system for the Medonte Hills system. At no time during 2004 did the "maximum daily flow" exceed the Permit to Take Water or exceed the maximum flow rate of treated water to the distribution system. The highest "daily flow" for the year from Well #1 occurred on April 15th at 110m3; Well #2 occurred on June 13th at 143 m3; and to the distribution system, it was 232 m3 on June 13th To ensure accuracy to within + or - 5% of flow within the range of 10% to 100% of the full scale reading of these magnetic flow meters, Summa Engineering Limited calibrated them on September 20th, 2004. .. ./2 ~~ \ Page Two Letter to M.O.E. Re: Medonte Hills - Annual Compliance Report for 2004 March 9, 2005 WATER QUALITY Bacteriological samples were taken weekly from the wells, pumphouse and distribution system, by certified Operators employed by the Township and submitted to Central Ontario Analytical Laboratory in Orillia. Two hundred and fifty-eight (258) samples were tested for "total coliforms" and "fecal coliforms" in 2004. There were no detectable results in 2004. To ensure that the chlorine residual was maintained above 0.2 mg/L in the distribution system, and a free chlorine residual was available in the distribution system, 12% Sodium Hypochlorite was pumped into the system. A total of 220 litres of 12% Sodium Hypochlorite, or an average of 0.68 Uday, was used in the Medonte Hills system in 2004. Four hundred and seventeen (417) daily tests for free chlorine in the distribution system were performed by certified Township Operators using a "Hack Pocket Colorimeter" during 2004. These tests were performed to ensure chlorine residual was above 0.2 mg/L in the distribution system. A Prominent Dulcometer analyses the chlorine residual continuously after the 15 minute contact time and is recorded by a data logger. An On-Line ABB 4670 Series Turbidity Meter measures turbidity continuously after the 15 minute contact time and is recorded by a data logger. Raw water turbidity tests are performed monthly by Township staff using a "Hack Pocket Turbidity Meter" and recorded in the daily log book. Quarterly water quality analyses sampling was performed by Geospec Engineering Ltd. in order to satisfy testing parameters for treated water, as per Ontario Regulation #170/03 dated June, 2003. Samples were taken by Geospec Engineering Ltd. and forwarded to Lakefield Research Limited for chemical testing. The chemical analysis results did not reveal any health related reportable exceedences during 2004. On October 23, 2002, the Ministry of the Environment issued Amended Certificate of Approval #9463-5F5N9K for the Medonte Hills Water Supply System. .. ./3 - Page Three Letter to M.O.E. Re: Medonte Hills - Annual Compliance Report for 2004 March 9. 2005 On August 5, 2004, the Ministry of the Environment issued Certificate of Approval #7566-62MPJJ for the installation of the standby power unit. "COMPLIANCE WITH TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE CERTIFICATE OF APPROV AL" Under Section 5, Upqradinq Requirements, the Certificate of Approval required the Township to have physical improvements completed, which were completed prior to the end of 2003. "NON-COMPLIANCE WITH TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE CERTIFICATE OF APPROV AL" On October 27, 2004, the Ministry of the Environment conducted an announced inspection of the Medonte Hills Water System to confirm compliance with current Regulations and to review the Permit to Take Water and Certificate of Approval. From this inspection, eleven (11) non-compliances with regulatory requirements and actions required were noted and are attached as Schedule I. "BEST PRACTICES RECOMMENDATIONS" From the October 27, 2004 inspection, the Ministry, in the interest of continuous improvement, provided the Township of Oro-Medonte with a list of twenty-five (25) suggestions for the operation of the Medonte Hills Water System. From this list, the Township of Oro-Medonte has presently completed nine (9) of these suggestions. Any further information required with respect to this Compliance Report for the Medonte Hills Water System should be directed to the undersigned at (705) 487-2171. TO Keith athieson, C.R.S.I. Director of Engineering and Environmental Services KM/ps Attachments r\ . 't ~011 . ,'>" , Ministry of the Environment ...~"'. · '. ," ,;tartc> Drinking Water System Inspection Report .____,_,..__.__....__"._.__.__..__......_.__...__._".______.__,__._...__......_..._m...____..._m........__.____."'.,.__...._.,_.__...__.__.._,__._....__.._._.__u__...___m__n_.._....______..__._.__._n.._.___..._.m..n......_._..m__.__.._..._..... . ACTIONS REQUIRED Se4W~ \ 1 The Operating Authority failed to report orally or in written form an observation that indicates improperly disinfected water may have been directed to the distribution system as required by Schedules 16-4, 16-6 and 16-7 of O. Reg. 170103. Incidents occurred on November 10,16, December 7,17,19,20 and 29 of 2003, and January 1, 3, 7, 8, 10, 17,20,21,23,24,26,27, April 1 and August 1 of 2004, in which the chlorine free residual, analyser recorded a value of less than 0.2 mg/L which is the concentration required by the Medonte Hills CofA (9463- 5F5N9K) at the point of entry to the distribution system. Action(s) Required: The Operating Authority shall report orally and in written format as required if, upon review of the data logger information, or any other observation, it is indicated that the chlorine free residual fell below 0.2 mg/L at the Medonte Hills pumphouse. 2 The Operating Authority failed to take the necessary corrective actions in response to observed adverse conditions at the facility as required by Schedule 17-2(1),(2) of O. Reg. 170103. Incidents occurred on November 10, 16, December 7,17,19,20 and 29 of 2003, and January 1, 3, 7, 8, 10, 17, 20, 21, 23, 24, 26, 27, April 1 and August 1 of 2004, in which the chlorine free residual analyser recorded a value of less than 0.2 mg/L which is the concentration required by the Medonte Hills CofA (9463-5F5N9K) at the point of entry to the distribution system. Action(s) Required: The Operating Authority shall ensure that alarm situations are promptly responded to, documented and appropriate corrective actions are carried out and documented as per Schedule 17-2 of O. Reg. 170103 to ensure proper disinfection of drinking water is maintained or restored as soon as possible. . 3 The Operating Authority failed to provide a notice of issue resolution including actions taken and lor results achieved within seven (7) days or otherwise after an adverse condition was resolved as required by Schedule 16-9(1)a,b ofO. Reg. 170/03. Incidents occurred on November 10,16, December 7,17,19,20 and 29 of 2003, and January 1, 3, 7, 8, 10, 17, 20, 21, 23, 24, 26, 27, April 1 and August 1 of 2004 in Which the chlorine free residual analyser malfunctioned or recorded a vaiue of less than 0.2 mg/L which is the concentration required by the Medonte Hills CofA (9463-5F5N9K) at the point of entry to the distribution system. There were indications on these dates that improperly disinfected water may have been directed to the distribution system which is a reportable event as per Schedule 16-4 of O. Re9. 170103. Action(s) Required: The Operating Authority shall provide notice of issue resolution including actions taken and results achieved to the Spills Action Centre and Simcoe County District Health Unit within seven (7) days of an adverse condition being resolved. 4 The Operating Authority failed to take the necessary corrective actions in response to total coliform counts greater than 0 cfu on a bacteriological analysis from a sample collected in the system as required by Schedule 17-6 ofO. Reg. 170103. The prescribed corrective action is to immediately resample and test which includes a sample from the same location, one upstream and one downstream. The resample which was supposed to be from the location was taken from a different location. This resample also produced a positive result which requires two further consecutive clear resample sets taken 24 to 48 hours apart. Only one set of resamples was taken and it was again taken from a different location than the original. Action(s) Required: The Operating Authority shall take the required number of resamples from the required locations in any future adverse water quality incidents. . ____..___._.__._____n...___________._____...___m._________.__....._.._._________".__.__....____.___.___..m.__n_....,._._..__.____..__,__..__,_._._...__.,_.___..__.,__~.-,--,---."-,--,----,,-.. Report Generated for sauerph on 217/2005 Page 31 of37 -------------.----------------- - -- -- -- - ----~---- ~--- - (1 au, - [1~ ' ' " '. ,',' ",. ,'" , " Ministry of tne Environment )~,__91}!~f!f' ________________________ ,___~r!~~~~_~_~~t~~~~~~~_I~~~~c:tion_Re~~~ 5 ljIe =tinJ~haity l>~ ~d to fully comply with Parts 1.2, 1.3 -Performance - and 2.1 (d) - loni I ~.cGertificate of Approval 9463-5F5N9K and Schedule "A" of PTIW . 92-P-3029. Flow measurin9 devices are to be in place at the Medonte Hills facilities which can measure and record instantaneous flow rates in Umin and pump run times from each source well into the treatment facility. This capability is currently not in place. Action(s) Required: None. The Municipality is currently installing flow measurin9 and recording equipment capable of measurin9 instantaneous flows at the Medonte Hills facility. It is expected this work will be completed early in the new year at the latest (2005). 6 The Operating Authority has failed to sample sodium in the correct location. Schedule 6-2 of O. Reg. 170/03 requires sodium to be sampled at the point of entry to the distribution system. The sample collected on December 18, 2003 was collected in the distribution system. Action(s) Required: The Operating Authority will resample for sodium at the point of entry to the distribution system by May 31, 2008. 7 The Operating Authority failed to fully document any unusual events, departures from normal operating procedures, abnormal conditions and the times these events occurred, the lengths of the events, or the actions taken at the facility as required by Section 20(5) 3, 4, 5 of O. Reg. 435/93. Action(s) Required: The Operating Authority shall record in the facility logbooks the approximate initial time, time at completion, cause of/for, actions taken, date, staff member(s) present, results achieved, and location of any operational checks, alarms, tests, repairs, unusual and/or abnormal conditions and/or directions or adjustments made on or within the Medonte Hills system. . 8 The Operating Authority has failed to sample for raw water turbidity once per month before any treatment. Schedule 7-3 of O. Reg. 170/03 requires raw water turbidity to be taken from a point before any treatment and analysed immediately once per month if the system obtains water from a ground water source. There is no record of raw water turbidity having been analysed for the month of August of 2003. Action(s) Required: None. The Operating Authority is now collecting and analysing a raw water turbidity sample monthly. 9 The Operating Authority has failed to collect samples within the time frame prescribed by Schedule 13-6 of O. Reg. 170/03. The prescribed sampling time frame for Trihalomethanes (THM's) is at least once every three months. In 2003, samples were taken on May 28, September 9, and December 18 which were five months and four months apart respectively. In 2004, samples were taken on February 26, May 31 and September 14 which were four and five months apart respectively. Action(s) Required: The Operating Authority will ensure that sampling is conducted not more than three calendar months apart as prescribed. . _._-_.._-_._---,._--,----_.._----~-----'_._---_.._----._.._.,._.~----- ._----------------~--_._--_._-,-----_..._-_. Report Generated for sauerph on 2/7/2005 Page 32 of37 . - (~i!Jo ...' ,," ,. ,.. .j;."... Ministry of the Environment ~> .'., ,." .". ntql"'tP Drinking Water System Inspection Report _.......__.N.._...___..________.._._.".__..______.._________.___....._.....__...__....__.____._._.._____.....______........_.____..,_~____._.._..__.__.._._"____..___,._,_____,..___.__n__m... 10 The Operating Authority has failed to collect samples within the time frame>prrscribed by . Schedule 13-7 of O. Reg. 170103. The prescribed sampling time frame for nitrates and nitrites is at least once every three months. In 2003, samples were taken on May 28. September 9, and December 18 which were five months and four months apart respectively. In 2004, samples were taken on February 26, May 31 and September 14 which were four and five months apart respectively. Action(s) Required: The Operating Authority will ensure that sampling is conducted not more than three calendar months apart as prescribed. 11 The Operating Authority has failed to fully comply with Special Condition 16 of PTTW 92-P-3029. Static water levels are to be taken and recorded monthly for each well. No static water levels were taken for either Well 1 or 2 in August of 2003. Action(s) Required: None. The Municipality has taken all required static water levels since that date. . . ..---.-.-.--.---.--,-------.----.--.---.---.--.-----..--.--...-----...-.-----....-.--.---.--.-----.---..-----..-......-.-...---.--.....-----.-...--. Report Generated for sauerph on 2f71200S Page 33 Df3? ~~ ('rJ~) :!}'v-/, ~ " ~~7 '-;~"'~~"'-'''~'--' ~3j:~~ TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE REPORT DEPT. REPORT NO.: TO: COMMITTEE OF THE PREPARED BY: EES2005-14 WHOLE Keith Mathieson SUBJECT: DEPARTMENT: COUNCIL: Annual Compliance Report - Engineering and Shanty Bay Water Supply Environmental Services C.OFW.: and Treatment - 2004 DATE: MOTION #: March 15, 2005 DATE: R. M. FILE NO.: E05-14518 li~~GIe~I{OUN~: , Section 4 of the Certificate of Approval issued to the Township of Oro-Medonte requires a written report detailing compliance with all terms and conditions of the approval to be completed annually. This Report is to be signed by a person designated by Council of the municipality that owns the works and a resolution is to be presented to Council that the Compliance Report has been received. The Compliance Report was due to be completed by March 31, 2005 and available for inspection by any member of the public without charge. ~~N~Is\"$~S; . - Attached is the Annual Compliance Report for 2004 for the Shanty Bay Water Supply System, a copy of which will be submitted to the Ministry of the Environment. This Report is being made available to Council for information and confirmation that Ontario Regulation #170/03 has been complied with by the Township of Oro-Medonte, and identifies any non-compliance issues and Provincial Officer's Orders. Four (4) days during the year of 2004, the Township exceeded their Permit to Take Water. Two days was a result of watering sod and hydro seeding in the ditches of the new Arbourwood Subdivision. I RECOMMENDA TJON(S): , 1. THAT Report #EES2005-14 be received and adopted. 2. AND THAT Council receives the Annual Compliance Report for 2004 for the Shanty Bay Water Supply System. Re~~lIy submitted, / \ ) ~cY/ ~ ~athieSOn \ THE CORPORA liON OF THE 148 Line 7 S., Box 100 TO WN C) Ii I P Ora. Ontario LOL ZXO Phone (705) 487-2171 Fa.x (705) 487-0133 (!!t~Of J~~ www.oro-medonte.ca. March 9, 2005 Ministry of the Environment 54 Cedar Pointe Drive Unit #1201 BARRIE, Ontario L4N 5R7 Re: Shanty Bay Water Supply and Treatment System Annual Compliance Report for 2004 Shanty Say Water System supplies 112 homes and the Shanty Bay Public School with water from three (3) ground water source wells. Permit to Take Water #03-P-1050 was issued to the Township of Oro-Medonte on June 9,2003, expiring June 15, 2013, for Well #'s 1, 2 and 3, authorizing the withdrawal of water. The withdrawal of water is not to exceed 305 m3 for Well #'s 1 and 2, and 610 m3 for Well #3, per day. The water treatment plant is to be operated to treat water at a rate not to exceed the maximum flow rate of 610 m3 per day. WATER QUANTITY Schedules have been attached showing the "average daily flow" per month and the "maximum daily flow" per month, and the maximum flow of treated water to the distribution system, as per Section 1.3 of the Certificate of Approval, for the Shanty Say system. On four (4) occasions durin~ 2004, the Permit to Take Water was exceeded for Well #2, being June 13th at 317 m , August 23rd at 306 m3, August 24lh at 370 m3 (contractor using water for sodding and hydro seeding of ditches in the new Arbour.'Vood subdivision) and September 5th at 308 m3. The highest "daily flow" from Well #1 occurred on May 19th at 136 m3; Well #3 occurred on September 30th at 248 m3. The highest "daily flow" into the distribution system occurred on August 24th at 357 m3. .. ./2 Page Two Letter to M.O.E. Re: Shanty Say - Annual Compliance Report for 2004 March 9. 2005 New magnetic flow meters have been installed on Well #'s 1, 2 and 3 to record flows from each well and flow to the distribution system, as part of the upgrades to the pumphouse. To ensure accuracy to within + or - 5% of actual rate of flow within the range of 10% to 100% of the full scale reading of these magnetic flow meters, Summa Engineering Limited calibrated them on September 20, 2004. WATER QUALITY Bacteriological samples were taken weekly from the wells, pumphouse and distribution system, by certified Operators employed by the Township and submitted to Central Ontario Analytical Laboratory in Orillia. Three hundred and twelve (312) samples were tested for "total coliforms" and "fecal coliforms" in 2004. There were no results indicating any reportable counts in 2004. To ensure that the chlorine residual was maintained above 0.2 mg/L in the distribution system, and a free chlorine residual was available in the distribution system, 12% Sodium Hypochlorite was pumped into the system. A total of 860 litres of 12% Sodium Hypochlorite, or an average of 1.95 Uday, was used in the Shanty Bay system in 2004. Four hundred and seventeen (417) daily tests for free chlorine in the distribution system were performed by certified Township Operators using a "Hack Pocket Colorimeter" during 2004. These tests were performed to ensure chlorine residual was above 0.2 mg/L in the distribution system. A Prominent Dulcometer analyses the chlorine residual continuously after the 15 minute contact time and is recorded by a data logger. An On-Line ABB 4670 Series Turbidity Meter measures turbidity continuously after the 15 minute contact time and is recorded by a data logger. Raw water turbidity tests are performed monthly by Township staff using a "Hack pocket Turbidity Meter" and recorded in the daily log book. Quarterly water quality analyses sampling was performed by Geospec Engineering Ltd. in order to satisfy testing parameters for treated water, as per Ontario Regulation #170/03 dated June, 2003. Samples were taken by Geospec Engineering Ltd. and forwarded to Lakefield Research Limited for chemical testing. The chemical analysis results did not reveal any health related reportable exceedences during 2004. .. ./3 Page Three Letter to M.O.E. ~ Re: Shanty Bay - Annual Compliance Report for 2004 March 9, 2005 On May 26, 2003, the Ministry of the Environment issued Amended Certificate of Approval #2379-5M3KSC to Arbourwood Estates Ltd. and the Township of Oro- Medonte. This Certificate was issued in order to complete the necessary upgrades to the pumphouse and construction of the standpipe. On August 5, 2004, the Ministry of the Environment issued Certificate of Approval #2544-62MP7P for the installation of the standby power unit. "COMPLIANCE WITH TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE CERTIFICATE OF APPROV AL" Under Section 5, UP9radinq Requirements, the Certificate of Approval required the Township to have physical improvements, which were completed in 2003. "NON-COMPLIANCE WITH TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE CERTIFICATE OF APPROV AL" On August 10, 2004, the Ministry of the Environment conducted an announced inspection of the Shanty Say Water System to confirm compliance with current Regulations and to review the Permit to Take Water and Certificate of Approval. From this inspection, Provincial Officer's Order #2550-664M82 was issued and is attached as Schedule I. All required works were completed prior to the November 30, 2004 deadline. From this inspection, the Ministry issued fifteen (15) non-compliances with regulatory requirements and actions required, attached as Schedule If. "BEST PRACTICES RECOMMENDATIONS" From the August 10, 2004 inspection, the Ministry, in the interest of continuous improvement, provided the Township of Oro-Medonte with a list of thirty-one (31) suggestions for the operation of the Shanty Say Water System. From this list, the Township of Oro-Medonte has presently completed sixteen (16) of these suggestions. Any further information required with respect to this Compliance Report for the Shanty Say Water System should be directed to the undersigned at (705) 487-2171. TO Keit a ieson, C.R.S.I. Director of Engineering and Environmental Services KM/ps Attachments .. '.. Sc..u1!f)\Jt,.L , _ . @MinistryOfthe. .' '0' Order Number'. .' " Environment PrOVInCIal Officer s rder 2550-664M82. . " Environmental Protection Act, R.S.O.1990, t.E 19 (EPA) ~.. M.",~." ~~o woo. ._~.... ....."". 0.. ~~, l'Environnement Pesticides Act, R.S.O.1990, c. Pl1 (PA) Ontario Safe Drinking Water Act, S.O. 2002, ..32 (SDWA) Nutrient Man'agement Act, 2002, 8.0. 2002, <:.4 To: The Corporation of the Township ofOro-Medonte PO Box 100 Oro, Ontario, LOL 2XO Canada Site: Lot: 27, Concession: 3 Oro-Medonte, County of Simcoe Work Ordered . 1. Effective immediately, the Operating Authority of the Shanty Bay Water System shall make the required notifications as prescribed by Schedule 16-4 of O. Reg. 170/03 in the event of any observation being made which indicates that improperly disinfected water may have been discharged to the distribution system. 2. Effective immediately, the Operating Authority of the Shanty Bay Water System shall take all corrective actions as prescribed by Schedule 17-2 ofO. Reg. 170/03 in the event of any observation being made which indicates that improperly disinfected water may have been discharged to the distribution system. 3. Effective immediately, the Operating Authority of the Shanty Bay Water System shall provide all required Notice(s) ofIssue Resolution within seVen days of the issue being resolved as prescribed by Schedule 16-9 of O. Reg. 170/03 in the event of any observation being made which indicates that improperly disinfected water may have been discharged to the distribution system. 4. Effective immediately, the Operating Authority of the Shanty Bay Water System shall ensure that abnonnal conditions, departures from nonnal operating procedures, equipment taken out of or put in service, or any other unusual event are fully documented including times, actions taken and results achieved in the . facility logbooks as prescribed by Section 20(5) of O. Reg. 435/93, and O. Reg. 128/04 Section 27(5). Page 1 - NUMBER 2550-664M82 . ~_' "'0'> '!IJf O:SJ" -" -"-''1. ~- ~, " ,': .."': . ",J!...,.~. 5. Effective immediately, the Operating Authority of the Shanty Bay Water . System shaH ensure that samples required by Schedules 13-6 and 13-7 of O. Reg. 170/03 are taken at least once every three months as prescribed. 6. The Operating Authority of the Shanty Bay Water System shall ensure that the location of the sample point for the Shanty Bay facility turbidimeter corresponds to the location in the facility Certificate of Approval (2379~SM3KBC), or, submit a complete application to amend Certificate of Approval 2379-5M3KBC to the Director of Environmental Licencing and Approvals Branch, 2 St. Claire Avenue West, Toronto to reflect the sample location for the turbidmeter at the end of the contact chamber at the Shanty Bay Water System. A copy of this Provincial Officer Order shaH be included with the application. The application shaH include the appropriate fees and be complete to the satisfaction of the Director. Submit the application by November 30, 2004. 7. Submit written notice to the undersigned that the work required by option 1 of Work Ordered Item #6 has been completed or provide a copy of the application required by option 2 of Work Ordered Item #6 to the undersigned by November 30,2004. A. . While this Order is in effect, a copy or copies of this order shaH he posted in a conspicuous place. B. While this Order is in effect, report in writing, to the District or Area office, any significant changes of operation, emission, ownership, tenancy or other legal status of the facility or operation. This Order is being issued for the reasons set out in the annexed Provincial Officers Report which fonns part of this Order. Issued at Oro-Medonte this 26th day of October, 2004. !IA~ Phillip Sauer Badge No: Barrie District Office . Tel: (705) 739-6441 Page 2 - NUMBER 2550-664M82 q - . APPEALIREVIEW. INFORMATION, REQUEST FOR REVIEW You may request that this order be reviewed by the Director. Your request must be made in writing (or orally with written confirmation) within seven days of service of this order and sent by mail or fax to the Director at the address beloW. In the 'Written request or writtetl confinnation you must, . specify the portions of this order that you wish to be reviewed; . include any submissions to be considered by the Director with respect to issuance of the order to you or any other person and with respect to the contents of the order; . apply for a stay of this order, if necessary; and provide an address for service by one of the following means: I. mail 2. fax The Director may confirm, alter or "revoke this order, If this order is revoked by the Director, you win be notified in writing. If this order is confirmed or amended by order of the Director, the Director's. order will be served upon you. The Director's order will include instructions for requiring a hearing before the Environmental Review Tribunal. DEEMED CONFIRMATION OF TillS ORDER If you do not receive oral or vnitten notice of the Director's decision within seven days of receipt of your request, this order is deemed to be confirmed by order of the Director and deemed to be served upon you. You may require a hearing before the Environmental Review Tribunal if, within 15 days of service of the confirming order deemed to have been made by the Director, you serve written notice of your appeal on the Environmental Review Tribunal and the Director. Your notice must state the portions of the order for which a hearing is required and the grdunds on which you intend to rely at the hearing. Except by leave of the Environmental Review Tribunal, you are not entitled to appeal a portion of the order or to rely on grounds. of appeal that are not stated in the notice requiring the hearing. Unless stayed by the Environmental Review Tribunal, the order is effective from the date of service. . Written notice requiring a hearing must be served personally or by mail upon: The Secretary and Director (provincial Officer Orders) Environmental Review Tribunal Ministry of ihe Environment P.O. Box 2382 Banie District Office 2300 Yonge SITeet, Suite 1201 1203-54 Cedar Pointe Dr Toronto, ON M4P IE4 Banie ON LAN 5R7 Fax: (705)739-6440 Tel: (705)739-6441 \\There service is made by mail, it is deemed to be made on the :fifth day after the date of mailing and the time for requiring a hearing is not extended by choosing service by mail. Further information on the Environrtlental Review Tribunal's requirements for an appeal can be obtained directly from the Tribunal by: Tel: (416) 314-4600 Fax: (416) 3t4-4506 WWW.ert.!2:ov.on.ca FOR YOUR INFORMATlON . Unless stayed by the Director or the Environmental Review Tribunal, this order is effective from the date of service. Non-compliance with the requirements of this order constitutes an offence. . The requirements of this order are minimurnrequirements only and do not relieve you from complying with the following: . any applicable federal legislation; . any applicable provincial requirements that are not addressed in the order; and . any applicable municipal law. . The requirements of this order are severable. If any requirement of this order or the application of any requirement to any circumstance is held invalid, the application of such requirement to other circumstances and the remainder of the order are not affected. . Further orders may be issued in accordance with the legislation as circumstances require. . The procedures to request a review by the Director and other information provided above are intended as a guide. The . legislation should be consulted for additional details and accurate reference. Page 3 - NUMBER 2550-664M82 , SL..t-\i:O uu:. \1 @ Ontario Ministry of the Environment Drinking Water System Inspection Report _....._...n........_"_......-O..........., .........".___...m...__._....m "_M"" .................-,,-....-......-..... ......m.__..m..___mm......__..__...........__.m......_..__ .............__....__._ ...._..,_.._......_.....m_ m','__.._"'. .' ACTIONS REQUIRED 1 The Operating Authority failed to sample and test for chlorine free residual in the distribution system on a daily basis as required by Schedule 7-2(3) of O. Reg. 170103. Samples were not taken on March 19, 2004. Action(s) Required: None. The Operating Authority monitored free chlorine residual in the distribution system thereafter as required. 2 The Operating Authority failed to take the necessary corrective actions in response to observed adverse conditions at the facility as required by Schedule 17-2(1),(2) of O. Reg. 170103. Incidents occurred on August 13, 21, 22, 23, October 2 through 19, October 23 through November 2, November 14,15, December 15,16,25,26,27 of 2003 in which the chlorine free residual analyzer malfunctioned or recorded a value of less than 0.2 mg/L which is the concentration required by the Shanty Bay CofA (2379.5M3KBC) at the point of entry to the distribution system. Action(s) Required: The Operating Authority shall ensure that alarm situations are promptly responded to, documented and appropriate corrective actions are carried out and documented to ensure proper disinfection of drinking water is maintained or restored as soon as possible. 3 The Operating Authority failed to report orally or in written form an observation that indicates improperiy disinfected water may have been directed to the distribution system as required by Schedules 16-4, 16-6 and 16-7 of O. Reg. 170103. Incidents occurred on August 13, 21, 22, 23, October 2 through 19, October 23 through November 2, November 14, 15, December 15, 16, . 25, 26, 27 of 2003 in which the chlorine free residual analyzer malfunctioned or recorded a value of less than 0.2 mg/L which is the concentration required by the Shanty Bay CofA (2379- 5M3KBC) at the point of entry to the distribution system. Action(s) Required: The Operating Authority shall report orally and in written format as required if, upon review of the data logger information, or any other observation, it is indicated that the chlorine free residual fell below 0.2 mg/L at the Shanty Bay pumphouse. 4 The Operating Authority failed to provide a notice of issue resolution including actions taken and lor results achieved within seven (7) days or otherwise after an adverse condition was resolved as required by Schedule 16-9(1)a,b of O. Reg. 170103. Incidents occurred on August 13, 21, 22, 23, October 2 through 19, October 23 through November 2, November 14,15, December 15, 16, 25, 26, 27 of 2003 in which the chlorine free residual analyzer malfunctioned or recorded a value of less than 0.2 mg/L which is the concentration required by the Shanty Bay CofA (2379- 5M3KBC) at the point of entry to the distribution system. There were indications on these dates that improperly disinfected water may have been directed to the distribution system which is a reportable event as per Schedule 16-4 of O. Reg. 170103. Action(s) Required: The Operating Authority shall provide notice of issue resolution including actions taken and results achieved to the Spills Action Centre and Simcoe County District Health Unit within seven (7) days of an adverse condition being resolved. 5 The Operating Authority failed to record the time each Operator spent as Operator in Charge as required by Section 18 of O. Reg. 435/93. . Action(s) Required: None. The Operating Authority now records the amount of time each Operator serves as Operator in Charge. . ...______.___n....._...n..__...______......_.....___..._____.__._..____.__._m_..___'___._____...__..___ _...__,._.._.___m____..__n_._.....__......___'_m.______ ._.._._._.__..____.__.___m"_'__'___..,_.__,_.~._____'_._.....---..-..--- ..-.------ -- ---""----.- " Report Generated for sauerph on 10/25/2004 Page 300f38 . ! 0;..... ~ .3.J. · a~ · r"';;' . . ,.,.1 _, ~,,_"'.,. @ 0 . Ministry of the Environment Y ntano Drinking Water System Inspection Report ."_""~_" .._,~__m__.__.._..,__._'''__''_"_''_''__'__ ..___..._ '__,"'__"_' ..............___ .........................._._... .. ,...__._ n...___,_m m..__m__ ...........mm........._.m... ................. ..m...._..__. __,,"._.__ ""..m m....._.. ........_ .. ....__ ... _._ 6 The Operating Authority has failed to fully comply with Parts 1.3, -Performance - and 2.1(c), (d)- . Monitoring and Recording - in Certificate of Approval 2379-5M3KBC and Special Condition 15 in Permit to Take Water 03-P-1 050. Flow measuring devices are to be in place at the Shanty Bay facility which can measure and record instantaneous fiow rates in Usec, Umin and pump run times from each source well into the treatment facility. This capability is currently not in place. Action(s) Required: None. The Municipality is currently installing fiow measuring and recording equipment capable of measuring instantaneous flows at the Shanty Bay facility. It is expected this work will be completed in the fall of 2004. 7 The Operating Authority has failed to fully comply with Schedule "A" in Permit to Take Water 03- P-1050. Limits on the maximum number of hours a day the various well pumps can be run have been prescribed. Wells 1 and 2 can be run for 12 hours per day each or Well 3 can be run for 10 hours per day. The maximum run time for Well #1 was confirmed to have exceeded 12 hours on June 22, 23, 25, 26, July 2, and September 30, of 2003 with potentially more days in exceedance but the readings were taken more than 24 hours apart. Action(s) Required: None. All of the recorded pump run time exceedances were the result of operationai practices including fiushing or water mains for residual maintenance and the filling of the stand-pipe. 8 The Operating Authority has failed to fully comply with Schedule "A" in Permit to Take Water 03- P-1050. Limits on the maximum takings in m3/day the various well pumps can draw have been prescribed. Wells 1 and 2 can draw 305 m3/day each or Well 3 can draw 610 m3/day. The maximum taking for Well #1 was confirmed to have exceeded 305 m3/day on June 22, 23, 25, 26, and July 2, of 2003 with one potential exceedance for Well #2 on June 13, 2004 but the readings were taken more than 24 hours apart. . Action(s) Required: None. All of the recorded pump run time exceedances were the result of operational practices including fiushing or water mains for chlorine free residual maintenance and the filling of the stand-pipe. 9 The Operating Authority has failed to sample sodium in the correct location. Schedule 6-2 of O. Reg. 170/03 requires sodium to be sampled at the point of entry to the distribution system. The sample collected on December 18, 2003 was collected in the distribution system. Action(s) Required: The Operating Authority will resample for sodium at the point of entry to the distribution system by May 31, 2008. 10 The Operating Authority failed to fully document any unusual events, departures from normal operating procedures, abnormal conditions and the times these event occurred, the lengths of the events, or the actions taken at the facility as required by Section 20(5) 3, 4, 5 of O. Reg. 435/93. Action(s) Required: The Operating Authority shall record in the facility logbooks the approximate initial time, time at completion, cause of/for, actions taken, date, staff member(s) present, results achieved, and location of any operational checks, alarms, tests, repairs, unusual and/or abnormal conditions and/or directions or adjustments made on or within the Shanty Bay system. . --_._~--------_.._-_._._------_._-----_.__._,..__._--_.-.-.---..-..--...-. ,.-.-.---.-"--.--.---..--....-...-- _.__..._---~-.~._._-----_._,---,._,,_._._-.._,,--_.,_._-_.._,_._,_._~--_.".,. Report Generated for sauerph on 10/25/2004 Page 31 of38 , -1 . @ 0 . Ministry of the Environment ,1?. ntano Drinking Water System Inspection Report . _....._._ .......__ m.....___...._____..'_..__ .....m.'_"'_ .......___'.._._ ...............m._..___..._._____....._... ...._.._.__._m...__._._"_" . ............m....___._._.....m_.....___..._..._.......__..._..___. no_ ...__.__.__......_.___.__._._.__.....__,.,__._..._n. .m_...__m.._.".._,__ ... . 11 The Operating Authority failed to ensure that water treatment equipment is installed at the Shanty Bay facility in compliance with CofA 2379-5M3KBC. The sample location for the continuous turbidity analyzer does not correspond to the sample location prescribed in the CofA. Action(s) Required: The Operating Authority shall comply with the prescribed sample location or apply for an amendment to the CofA to change the sample location to the current location by November 30, 2004. 12 The Operating Authority has failed to sample for raw water turbidity once per month before any treatment. Schedule 7-3 of O. Reg. 170/03 requires raw water turbidity to be taken from a point before any treatment and analyzed immediately once per month if the system obtains water from a ground water source. There is no record of raw water turbidity having been analyzed for the months of June, July and August of 2003. Action(s) Required: None. The Operating Authority is now collecting and analyzing a raw water turbidity sample monthly. 13 The Operating Authority has failed to collect 'quarterly' samples within the time frame prescribed by Schedules 13-6 and 13-7 of O. Reg. 170/03. The prescribed sampling time frames for Trihalomethanes (THM's), nitrates and nitrites is at least once every three months. In 2003, samples were taken on May 28, September 9, and December 18 which were five months and four months apart respectively. In 2004, samples were taken on February 26 and May 31 which were four months apart. Action(s) Required: The Operating Authority will ensure that sampling is conducted not more . than three calendar months apart as prescribed. 14 The Operating Authority failed to ensure that water could not collect or pond around the well casing. Section 11(11) of O. Reg. 903/90 prescribes that in a well in which the casing extends above the land surface. the well will not be constructed in such a manner that water can pond or collect around the casing. Well #3 was constructed in such a way as to allow water to pond around the casing. Action(s) Required: None. As of October 14, 2004, the Operating Authority has regraded the surrounding land surface around Well #3 in such a manner that water will no longer collect or pond around the casing. 15 The Operating Authority failed to ensure that a well pit was not constructed. Section 12(7) of O. Reg. 903/90 prescribes that no well pit shall be constructed at any area. Well #3 was surrounded by a well crock and the soil regraded when constructed. This formed a well pit. Action(s) Required: None. As of October 14, 2004, the Operating Authority has regraded the surrounding land surface around Well #3 in such a manner that the crock is no longer a well pit. . ___._.m_.__.__n___..._._..._..___n___.______..__.__________.________.m_._ __._m._.___.._....,.__.._______..._.__ . ...._.._,..._.__.,__...._._m__...___'_ .---------.-----....----,..........--.' Report Generated for sauerph on 10/25/2004 Page 32 of 38 ~ . Ministry of the Environment .~",. Q~~~~I~, """" """,."",.,.,.""., ".. ",'"".",_.. """"""'" "",,~ri~~i.n?'JII~t~~~~~,t':.~I~~~~~tio~~~port 16 The Operating Authority failed to ensure that a well casing extended the minimum prescribed . distance above the surrounding ground surface. Section 13(8) of O. Reg. 903/90 prescribes that the casing must extend at least 40 cm above the highest point of the ground surface within three metres radially. Well #3 was surrounded by a well crock and the soil regraded when constructed. This construction lowered the well casing below 40 cm to the surrounding ground surface. Action(s) Required: None. As of October 14, 2004, the Operating Authority has regraded the surrounding land surface around Well #3 in such a manner that the casing extends 40 cm above it. 17 The Operating Authority failed to ensure that a well cover was secured sufficiently to prevent entry of surface water or foreign material into the well. Section 11(3) of O. Reg. 903/90 prescribes that the upper end of the well casing must have a cover which is sufficiently securely attached to prevent the entry of surface water or foreign material into the well. Well #3 was equipped with a venled steel cap but it was left unsecured upon completion of the well. Action(s) Required: None. As of July 14, 2004, the Operating Authority secured the well cap in such a manner that foreign material and surface water can no longer enter the well. . . --.- ..-.----.-----.~----_.__..----..--.--.----,-.--.-..,--...-.---------,--,--.. ...__........______......_._____.......___._n.________._._._...__._...____,___,_____._..__n_ m__..... .___ .. __........_.____,__ Report Generated for sauerph on 10/25/2004 Page 33 of38 otOR:O \ih g:.'~ ,------__... '4t't";\'- /~.f) ~ 0" ~, ~ ~ I ~ t7-\.,----'" '1:, ~. </ ",crc,.,,'''=L '%.~;.,,;;-:;::';;,,,,#- ,..~Z'" TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE REPORT DEPT. REPORT NO.: TO: COMMITTEE OF THE PREPARED BY: EES2005-15 WHOLE Keith Mathieson SUBJECT: DEPARTMENT: COUNCIL: Annual Compliance Report - Engineering and Sugarbush Water Supply Environmental Services C.OFW.: and Treatment - 2004 DATE: MOTION #: March 15, 2005 DATE: R. M. FILE NO.: E05-14518 ~J3:~(;l{G~()tJ~: , Section 4 of the Certificate of Approval issued to the Township of Oro-Medonte requires a written report detailing compliance with all terms and conditions of the approval to be completed annually. This Report is to be signed by a person designated by Council of the municipality that owns the works and a resolution is to be presented to Council that the Compliance Report has been received. The Compliance Report was due to be completed by March 31, 2005 and available for inspection by any member of the public without charge. ~~I'4~IDX$J:$; - Attached is the Annual Compliance Report for 2004 for the Sugarbush Water Supply System, a copy of which will be submitted to the Ministry of the Environment. This Report is being made available to Council for information and confirmation that Ontario Regulation #170/03 has been complied with by the Township of Oro-Medonte, and identifies any non-compliance issues. ~RECOMMENDATION(S}: - 1. THAT Report #EES2005-15 be received and adopted. 2. AND THAT Council receives the Annual Compliance Report for 2004 for the Sugarbush Water Supply System. Respectfully submitted, /lJ Kei~eson " THE CORPORATION OF THE 148Line7S" Box !OO TOW N8 Ii I P Ora. Ontario LOL 2XO Phone (705) 487-2171 Fax (705) 487-0133 r9~OfJl6~ae www.oro-rnedonte.G\ March 9, 2005 Ministry of the Environment 54 Cedar Pointe Drive Unit #1201 BARRIE, Ontario L4N 5R7 Re: Sugarbush Water Supply and Treatment System Annual Compliance Report for 2004 Sugarbush Water System supplies 322 homes with water from two (2) ground water source wells. Permit to Take Water #1483-5MYQ36 was issued to the Township of Oro-Medonte on June 27, 2003 for Sugarbush Well #'s 1 and 2, and Diamond Valley/Forest Hill Developments. Well #3, which was not in service in 2004, expires May 31, 2013. Sugarbush Well #1 is permitted 851 m3 per day, Well #2 is permitted 1,635 m3 per day, and Well #3 is permitted 1,635 m3 per day. The water treatment plant is to be operated to treat water at a rate not to exceed the maximum flow rate of 851 m3, per day, for Well #1 and 1,635 m3, per day, for Well #2. WATER QUANTITY Schedules have been attached showing the "average daily flow" per month and the "maximum daily flow" per month, and the maximum flow of treated water to the distribution system, as per Section 1.3 of the Certificate of Approval, for the Sugarbush system. During 2004, Well #2 was the only Well in use. Upgrades to Well #1 are planned for the Spring of 2005, which will allow Well #1 to be put back in service. At no time during 2004 did the "maximum daily flow" exceed the Permit to Take Water for Well #2. The highest "daily flow" for the year occurred on May 24th at 1,008 m3, at which time the well pump failed to shut down as a result of an electrical storm. The next highest "daily flow" occurred on June 13th and July 11 th at 636 m3. New magnetic flow meters were installed on Well #'s 1 and 2 to record well flows and flows to the distribution system. .. ./2 Page Two Letter to M.O.E. Re: Sugarbush - Annual Compliance Report for 2004 March 9. 2005 To ensure accuracy to within + or - 5% of flow within the range of 10% to 100% of the full scale reading of these magnetic flow meters. Summa Engineering Limited calibrated them on September 21, 2004. WATER QUALITY Bacteriological samples were taken weekly from the wells, pumphouse and distribution system, by certified Operators employed by the Township and submitted to Central Ontario Analytical Laboratory in Orillia. Two hundred and sixty-two (262) samples were tested for "total coliforms" and "fecal coliforms" in 2004. Two (2) test results during the year had a reportable count of "total coliforms". M.O.E.E. Spills Action Centre and the Simcoe County District Health Unit were notified, resamples were taken and returned negative. No further actions were required. To ensure that the chlorine residual was maintained above 0.2 mg/L in the distribution system, and a free chlorine residual was available in the distribution system, 12% Sodium Hypochlorite was pumped into the system. A total of 750 litres of 12% Sodium Hypochlorite, or an average of 2.05 Uday, was used in the Sugarbush system in 2004. Four hundred and twenty-three (423) daily tests for free chlorine in the distribution system were performed by certified Township Operators using a "Hack Pocket Colorimeter" during 2004. These tests were performed to ensure chlorine residual was above 0.2 mg/L in the distribution system. A Prominent Dulcometer analyses the chlorine residual continuously after the 15 minute contact time and is recorded by a data logger. An On-Line ABB 4670 Series Turbidity Meter measures turbidity continuously after the 15 minute contact time and is recorded by a data logger. Raw water turbidity tests are performed monthly by Township staff using a "Hack Pocket Turbidity Meter" and recorded in the daily log book. Quarterly water quality analyses sampling was performed by Geospec Engineering Ltd. in order to satisfy testing parameters for treated water, as per Ontario Regulation #170/03 dated June, 2003. Samples were taken by Geospec Engineering Ltd. and forwarded to Lakefield Research Limited for chemical testing. The chemical analysis results did not reveal any health related reportable exceedences during 2004. On October 17, 2002, the Ministry of the Environment issued Amended Certificate of Approval #6268-SEJRBX for the Sugarbush Water Supply System. .. ./3 Page Three Letter to M.O.E. Re: Sugarbush - Annual Compliance Report for 2004 March 9. 2005 "COMPLIANCE WITH TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE CERTIFICATE OF APPROV AL" Under Section 5, Upqradinq Requirements, the Certificate of Approval required the Township to have physical improvements (a list of which may be received upon request) completed by July 1, 2003. A Tender for upgrades, 5.1 (b), was awarded to Midland Mechanical in August, 2002 and this work was completed prior to December 31, 2002. The Tender for the construction of the 15 minute contact chamber was awarded to Arnott Construction and completed in the Spring of 2003. The upgrades to pumphouse #1 have not been completed and the Township has applied for an extension until July, 2005 to have these works completed. "NON-COMPLIANCE WITH TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE CERTIFICATE OF APPROV AL" On September 15, 2004, the Ministry of the Environment inspected the Sugarbush Water System to confirm compliance with current Regulations and to review the Permit to Take Water and Certificate of Approval. From this inspection, the Ministry of the Environment identified fourteen (14) non- compliances with regulatory requirements and actions required, which are attached as Schedule I. "BEST PRACTICES RECOMMENDATIONS" From the September 15, 2004 inspection, the Ministry, in the interest of continuous improvement, provided the Township of Oro-Medonte with a list of twenty-five (25) suggestions for the operation of the Sugarbush Water System. From this list, the Township of Oro-Medonte has presently completed eleven (11) of these suggestions. Any further information required with respect to this Compliance Report for the Sugarbush Water System should be directed to the undersigned at (705) 487-2171. Sincerely, TOITP OF OAO-MEOONTE Keith Mathieson, C.R.S.I. Director of Engineering and Environmental Services KM/ps Attachments . . SuJmUL.t:. I @ .. " ' .' ,,'...... Ministry of the Environment ....~..,ontarlO Drinking Water System Inspection Report _'"_"_~__'_____'_'____'__'_""____'_'_'_ __._._,___,_" m_.__.."._____.._._'"_.._.,...~__.._._._._u_._,.,.~___ ........._ n...___...______.mo._...._,___..._._ m...._'.___......_____._______"_...m.._....._..___,__._.^_.. . ACTIONS REQUIRED 1 The Operating Authority failed to report orally or in written form an observation that indicates improperly di$infected water may have been directed to the distribution system as required by Schedules 16-4, 16-6 and 16-7 of O. Reg. 170/03. Incidents occurred on July 17, August 5,11, 16, September 21, November 10, 13 and December 6 of 2003 in which the chlorine free residual analyser malfunctioned or recorded a value of less than 0.2 mg/L which is the concentration required by the Sugar Bush CofA (6268.5EJRBX) at the point of entry to the distribution system. Action(s) Required: The Operating Authority shall report orally and in written format as required if, upon review of the data logger information, or any other observation, it is indicated that the chlorine free residual fell below 0.2 mg/L at the Sugar Bush pumphouses. 2 The Operating Authority failed to take the necessary corrective actions in response to observed adverse conditions at the facility as required by Schedule 17-2(1),(2) of O. Reg. 170/03. Incidents occurred on July 17, August 5,11, 16, September 21, November 10, 13 and December 6 of 2003 in which the chlorine free residual analyser malfunctioned or recorded a value of less than 0.2 mg/L which is the concentration required by the Sugar Bush CofA (626B-5EJRBX) at the point of entry to the distribution system. Action(s) Required: The Operating Authority shall ensure that alarm situations are promptly responded to, documented and appropriate corrective actions are carried out and documented to ensure proper disinfection of drinking water is maintained or restored as soon as possible. 3 The Operating Authority failed to provide a notice of issue resolution including actions taken and lor results achieved within seven (7) days or othelWise after an adverse condition was resolved . as required by Schedule 16-9(1 )a,b of O. Reg. 170103. Incidents occurred on July 17, August 5, 11,16, September 21, November 10,13 and December 6 of 2003 in which the chlorine free residual analyser malfunctioned or recorded a value of less than 0.2 mg/L which is the concentration required by the Sugar Bush CofA (6268-5EJRBX) at the point of entry to the distribution system. There were indications on these dates that improperly disinfected water may have been directed to the distribution system which is a reportable event as per Schedule 16-4 of O. Reg. 170/03. Action(s) Required: The Operating Authority shall provide notice of issue resolution including actions taken and results achieved to the Spills Action Centre and Simcoe County District Health Unit within seven (7) days of an adverse condition being resolved. 4 The Operating Authority has failed to sample sodium in the correct location. Schedule 6-2 of O. Reg. 170/03 requires sodium to be sampled at the point of entry to the distribution system. The sample collected on December 18, 2003 was collected in the distribution system. Action(s) Required: The Operating Authority will resample for sodium at the point of entry to the distribution system by May 31, 2008. . _."._.._~_.____'__..__m___.___.__._.,_ .m_~__~__~._.,____.._ ....".._......________..__._ __.._.__ _. .. _. _._ .._..__,_____...___._____..... .. ._.___"_"',_'"___ ___ ____...__.~_.___"._..__.m.... Report Generated for sauerph on 2/3/2005 Page 33 of39 ~ ~~~ ~t;ll_t;.,C. Ministry of the Environment .' .", ...','.,. ,. ,...' .'.l1tQrIP Drinking Water System Inspection Report ._______________________n__._...__..__..._....,.."_.......... m_.n......___n____....n____n____'_..' ...__.__.._..__.___,.__...___ .._...__..._._._____._.____~__~_._.__.__.___.._'.__m_....-.-.-.--'. 5 The Operating Authority has failed to sample and record a chlorine free residual at the time of microbiological sample collection. Schedule 6-3(1)a of O. Reg. 170/03 requires a sample be . taken and tested for chlorine free residual at the same time as a sample taken for microbiological parameters. There is no record of chlorine free sampling at the time three resamples for microbiological parameters were collected on August 5, 2004. Action(s) Required: The Operating Authority will immediately ensure that a chlorine free residual sample is taken, tested and a value recorded at the same time and location as any samples collected for microbiological parameters. 6 The Operating Authority has failed to sample for raw water turbidity once per month before any treatment. Schedule 7-3 of O. Reg. 170/03 requires raw water turbidity to be taken from a point before any treatment and analysed immediately once per month if the system obtains water from a ground water source. There is no record of raw water turbidity having been ana lysed for the months of June, July and August of 2003. Action(s) Required: None. The Operating Authority is now collecting and analysing a raw water turbidity sample monthly. 7 The Operating Authority has failed to collect samples within the time frame prescribed by Schedule 13-6 of O. Reg. 170/03. The prescribed sampling time frame for Trihalomethanes (THM's) is at least once every three months. In 2003, samples were taken on May 28, September 9, and December 18 which were five months and four months apart respectively. In 2004, samples were taken on February 26, May 31 and September 14 which were four and five months apart respectively. Action(s) Required: The Operating Authority will ensure that sampling is conducted not more . than three calendar months apart as prescribed. 8 The Operating Authority has failed to collect samples within the time frame prescribed by Schedule 13-7 of O. Reg. 170/03. The prescribed sampling time frame for nitrates and nitrites is at least once every three months. In 2003, samples were taken on May 28, September 9, and December 18 which were five months and four months apart respectively. In 2004, samples were taken on February 26, May 31 and September 14 which were four and five months apart respectively. Action(s) Required: The Operating Authority will ensure that sampling is conducted not more than three calendar months apart as prescribed. 9 The Operating Authority failed to ensure that a well cover was secured sufficiently to prevent entry of surface water or foreign material into the well. Section 11(3) of O. Reg. 903/90 prescribes that the upper end of the well casing must have a cover which is sufficiently securely attached to prevent the entry of surface water or foreign material into the well. Well #3 was equipped with a broken cap which was unsecured at the time of the physical facility inspection on September 15, 2004. Action(s) Required: None. Written notification was received on September 27, 2004 by the MOE that the Operating Authority had secured the well cap in such a manner that foreign material and surface water can no longer enter the well. . ------~~,.__._-,._._-------_.__.__.--------'-_.__._------....-.--------------....----.---.--------.---.-------------.---.-.--.-....,-- Report Generated for sauerph on 2/3/2005 Page 34 of39 ~,() .'., '" '.', .~. ", Ministry of the Environment ,.~., .' ,..,' .'., ntlAinc::J Drinking Water System Inspection Report m.__..'_"--'._"_____..._._.......;........__~__..._._......__._.._.".___.._.....__c___m~_.___.___.._.__..__...__,___.__..___'...__.,.".._.'m__....u......_......__._......___..._._e._.........__.____...._,__.... 10 The Operating Authority failed to ensure that water treatment equipment is installed at the Sugar Bush facilities in compliance with CofA 6268-5EJRBX. The sample location for the continuous turbidity analyser does not correspond to the sample location prescribed in the ColA. Action(s) Required: The Operating Authority shall comply with the prescribed sample location or apply for an amendment to the CofA to change the sample location to the current location or the prescribed use for this instrumentation by March 31,2005. 11 The Operating Authority failed to ensure that water treatment equipment is installed at the Sugar Bush Pumphouse 1 lacility in compliance with CofA 6268-5EJRBX. The prescribed upgrade installation deadline of July 1, 2003 for treatment equipment has not been met. The pumphouse is not complete and not operational. Action(s) Required: The Operating Authority shall immediately install the prescribed treatment equipment in Pumphouse 1 or, by March 31, 2005, apply for an amendment to the CofA to extend the upgrade deadline until July 31, 2005. 12 The Operating Authority has failed to fully comply with Parts 1.2, 1.3 -Performance. and 2.1(c), (d) - Monitoring and Recording - in Certificate of Approval 6268-5EJRBX and Table A of PTTW 1483-5MYQ36. Flow measuring devices are to be in place at the Sugar Bush facilities which can measure and record instantaneous flow rates in Umin and pump run times from each source well into the treatment facilities. This capability is currently not in place. Action(s) Required: None. The Municipality is currently installing flow measuring and recording equipment capable of measuring instantaneous flows at the Sugar Bush facilities. It is expected this work will be completed early in the new year at the latest (2005). 13 The Operating Authority failed to fully document any unusual events, departures from normal operating procedures, abnormal conditions and the times these event occurred, the lengths 01 the events, or the actions taken at the facility as required by Section 20(5) 3, 4, 5 of O. Reg. 435193. Action(s) Required: The Operating Authority shall record in the facility logbooks the approximate initial time, time at completion, cause of/for, actions taken, date, staff member(s) present, results achieved, and location of any operational checks, alarms, tests, repairs, unusual and/or abnormal conditions and/or directions or adjustments made on or within the Sugar Bush system. 14 The Operating Authority failed to ensure that the person with overall responsibility for the Sugar Bush system and the person supervising those operators working within and on the system had certification level equal to or above the classification level of the system as required by O. Reg. 435 Section 13(1) under the OWRAand Section 11(5) under the SDWA. The Operator in Overall Responsibility (OIOR) or now Overall Responsible Operator (ORO) for the Sugar Bush system, Mr. Fred MacGregor, holds a Class 2 Water Distribution license where as the Sugar Bush system is a Class 3 Water Distribution system. Action(s) Required: The Operating Authority shall designate an Operator with the appropriate qualifications (Class 3 WD) for the Sugar Bush system to act as ORO and supervisor at least until the system reclassification under O. Reg. 128/04 is complete. It is expected the system will be reclassified as a Class 2 Treatment and Distribution system. __.______...~__.._.__._._.__._.,_.. ____n.___'..._. n__..___.______n__.______ ,_.... ._._..__.....___..__,__.__._..........._.._...._..___...___ .__m___..__.___,___.____~_..._,.._,..._.__.,_._.__...,.__-~-,-------". Report Generated for salJerph on 2/3/2005 Page 35 of39 ~o( o~o_ ~ ~",-,--,<.,<, ~ .; ~( ',~ $.. - \ , t! iIJ ~\ ... '.' ,.,lij "'It / ,,) ~" ,", ", "~~ "-~,.,," . TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE REPORT Dept. Report No. To: COMMITTEE OF THE Prepared By: WHOLE EES2005-17 Keith Mathieson Subject: Department: Council 1045942 Ontario Inc. (Ken Engineering and Hewitt) - Site Plan Agreement Environmental Services C.ofW. - Part of the West Yo and SE 'A Date: of Lot 1, Concession 14, March 15, 2005 Motion # Being Parts 1, 2 and 3, 51 R- R.M. File #: 6268 - Being all of PIN L04-13680 Date: #58530-0316 (Lt) RolI#: 020-004-23200 II BACKGROUND: II Mr. Hewitt is proposing to construct a 12 m x 24 m shop located on Hwy. #12 at Price's Corners. II ANALYSIS: II Mr. Hewitt's Site Plan application was presented to the Site Plan Committee on May 14, 2004. The only outstanding issue from the meeting was Mr. Hewitt requiring a "building and land use permit" from the Ministry of Transportation and Highways. This permit was issued on February 7,2005. Township staff have no concerns with this proposal. II RECOMMENDATION(S): II 1. THAT Report No. EES2005-17 be received and adopted. 2. THAT the Township of Oro-Medonte enters into a Site Plan Agreement with 1045942 Ontario Inc. to construct a 12 m x 24 m shop. 3. THAT the Clerk prepares a By-law for Council's consideration. 4. AND THAT Mr. Hewitt be notified of Council's decision. -~ '0 / f' fJS'J '- jV '" f>O \u:-' <- V1~ Keith at leson Director of Engineering and Environmental Services APPENDIX "A" ~ SITE PLAN AGREEMENT - between - 1045942 ONTARIO INC. (KEN HEWITT) - and - THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE DESCRIPTION OF LANDS Part of the West Y, and SE 14 of Lot 1, Concession 14 Being Parts 1, 2 and 3, 51R-6268 Being all of PIN #58530-0316 (LI) Roll # 4346.020-004-23200-0000 TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE COUNTY OF SIMCOE March, 2005 By-Law No. 2005- - THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE SITE PLAN AGREEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1 Covenants by the Owner Section 2 Covenants by the Township Section 3 Developmenl Restrictions Section 4 Development Changes Section 5 Security Section 6 Compliance Section 7 Co-operation Section 8 Binding Effect Section 9 Severability of Clauses Section 10 Save Harmless SCHEDULES Schedule "A" Legal Description of Lands Schedule "B" Sile Plan Schedule "C" Deeds and Easemenls to be Conveyed Schedule "D" Itemized Eslimate of Cosl of Construction 2 - SITE PLAN CONTROL AGREEMENT This Agreement made, in quadruplicate, this day of 2005, in accordance with Section 41 of the Planninq Act. BETWEEN: 1045942 ONTARIO INC. (KEN HEWITT) Hereinafter called the "Owner" PARTY OF THE FIRST PART -and- THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE Hereinafter called the "Township" PARTY OF THE SECOND PART WHEREAS the Owner has applied to the Township of Oro-Medonte to permit a 12 m x 24 m shop on lands described in Schedule "A", attached hereto: AND WHEREAS the Township has enacted a By-law to provide for the designation of the lands as a "Site Plan Control Area"; AND WHEREAS the Owner intends to develop the lands in accordance with the Site Plan attached hereto as Schedule "B"; NOW THEREFORE This Agreement Wilnesseth THAT in consideration of the mutual covenanls hereinafter contained, lhe parties hereto hereby covenant and agree as follows: 3 1. COVENANTS BY THE OWNER The Owner covenants and agrees as follows: a) The Owner owns the subjecllands described in Schedule "A", attached hereto, and has provided the Township with a Registered Deed containing the legal description of the subject lands, b) This Agreement may be regislered against title to lhese subject lands and shall take priority over any subsequent registrations against the tille to the subject lands. c) No work shall be performed on the lands. nor any use made of the subject lands with respect to the proposed development. except in conformity with all the provisions of this Agreement. d) The Owner shall, prior to the execution of lhis Agreement, obtain all necessary permits and approvals from the Township and from all Ministries and Agencies, including. but not limited to, the County of Simcoe. e) The Owner shall, prior to the execution of this Agreement, pay all municipal taxes and charges related to obtaining the approval of these lands for the intended use, f) The Owner shall pay a refundable deposit for such reasonable cosls as may be involved 10 lhe Township in having its solicitor, engineer, planner and staff, perform any work in connection with this Agreement, including the preparation, drafting, execution, and registration of this Agreement. The Owner acknowledges and agrees that the Owner shall be responsible for the cosl of performance of all the Owner's obligations hereunder, unless the contexi otherwise requires. Every provision of this Agreement. by which the Owner is obligated in any way, shall be deemed to include the words "at lhe expense of the Owner". unless specifically stated olherwise, The refundable deposit for expenses and actual cost shall be $1,000.00, The Owner shall replenish the refundable deposit, to ils full amounl, when the expenses and actual costs are submitted by the Township. g) The Owner shall have delivered to the Township, all Transfers/Deeds, Discharges and Easements, or other documents required by Schedule "C", as well as certification from the Owner's solicitor that the Transfer/Deeds and Easements shall provide lhe Township with good title, free and clear from all encumbrances. 2. COVENANTS BY THE TOWNSHIP The Township covenanls and agrees as follows: a) Thai the Township has enacted a By-law to permit a 12 m x 24 m shop described on the Site Plan. b) That the Township agrees that subject to compliance by the Owner with all relevant Municipal By-laws and Provincial Statutes and Regulations, the Owner may proceed to develop the subject lands, as indicated on the Site Plan attached hereto as Schedule "B", subject to the development restrictions contained herein. 3. DEVELOPMENT RESTRICTIONS The Parties hereto acknowledge and agree that any use of the subject lands by the Owner shall be on and subject to the following terms and conditions: 4 a) Site Plan The use and development of the subject lands shall be in accordance wilh and as set out on the Site Plan, attached hereto as Schedule "B", b) liqhtinq All lighting systems installed outside, such as floodlights, shall be directed away from any adjacent residential use andlor roadway. not to cause interference in any way. c) Parkinq Areas and Driveways All parking areas and driveways shall be constructed in conformity with Sections 5,19 and 5,20 of By-law No. 97-95, as amended, and the Ontario Building Code Regulation #419186, and such parking areas, loading, and access areas shall be kept free and clear of snow and ice and kept adequately drained, All entrances shall be conslructed, as in Schedule "B" attached. The Owner agrees to obtain all necessary approvals from lhe Ministry of Transportation, County of Simcoe and Township of Oro-Medonte. d) Outside Storaqe No outside storage shall be permitted between any buildings on the premises and any street. Any other outside storage shall be contained in the fenced compound, as identified on Schedule "B". e) Garbaqe Storaqe The Owner agrees to provide suitable storage areas for garbage and waste, as shown on the Site Plan, and to install and maintain litter containers in and around development on the lands, All metal scrap and associated refuse contained in the fenced compound shail be removed on a weekly basis, f) Landscapinq The Owner shall complete all landscaping and landscaped areas shown on the Site Plan, attached as Schedule "B", as soon as weather permits. and all grading and sodding required, according to any Engineering drawings submitted, shall be done on all lawn areas, g) Erosion and Siltation Control The Owner must take all necessary precautions to prevent erosion and sedimentation of ditches and culverts, slopes, etc., within the Site Plan, and downstream prior to and during construction. The Owner agrees 10 maintain all erosion and siltation control devices in good repair until vegetative cover has been successfully established, 4. DEVELOPMENT CHANGES The parties acknowledge and agree that there shall be no changes to this Agreement or lhe Schedules attached hereto, unless and until such changes have been approved by all parties. It is the intention of the parties that material amendments to this Agreemenl be properly recorded. Such amendments may take the form of a regislered Amending Agreement, an unregistered Agreement, exchange of correspondence, Memorandum of Confirmation, or notations on Engineering drawings. The nature of such record of amendment shall depend on circumslances. 5 q, Ie- 5. SECURITY Prior to signing the Agreement, the Owner will deposit. with the Treasurer of the Township. to cover the faithful pertormance of the obligations of the Owner arising under this Agreement. including but not limited to the construction of the works and services identified in Schedule "0" to this Agreement (the "said Work"), the following securities: a) Cash in the amount of one hundred percent (100%) of the estimated cost of the said work, as approved by the Township Engineer and Township Council, or: b) An irrevocable Letter of Credit from a chartered bank. issued in accordance with lhe requirements of Schedule "E". with an automatic renewal clause in the amount of one hundred percent (100%) of the estimated costs of the said works, and as approved by lhe Township Engineer. The Letter of Credit shall be for a minimum guaranteed period of one (1) year, or such time as the Township decides, and shall be renewed automatically, as necessary. thirty (30) days prior to expiration, c) The Township reserves the right to accept or reject any of these altemative methods of providing securities. Prior to depositing the securities, the Owner's Engineer shall submit an estimate of the cost of lhe works to the Township Engineer for approval. When the cost estimate has been approved, it will be set out in Schedule "0" of this Agreement and will become the basis for the limits of the securities. d) Any Letter of Credit or security filed wilh the Township is based upon the estimated cost of compleling the various matters prescribed by this Agreement. However, all Letters of Credit and security received by the Township may be used as security for any item or any other matter which. under the lerms of this Agreement, is the responsibility of the Owner. including without limiting the generality of the foregoing, payment of engineering, legal, planning or other cosls incurred by the Township, which are lhe responsibility of the Owner, under the lerms of this Agreement. e) Upon written notification by the Owner's agent. certifying that all required works for which the Letter of Credit was submitted have been completed in accordance with the plans submitted and upon confirmation by lhe Township or its agenllhat the Owner's obligations under this Agreemenl have been completed, the Township will return said Letter of Credit. f) If in the event of default of the Owner under any of the provisions at this Agreement. it becomes necessary for the Township to realize on its security or deposits. then lhe Township shall give, by registered mail, twenty-one (21) day's notice. its intent to draw down on the security or deposit. 6. COMPLIANCE Any action taken by the Township or on its behalt, pursuant to this Agreement, shall be in addition to and without prejudice to any security or other guarantee given on behalf of the Owner for the pertormance of its covenants and agreements herein, and upon default on the part of the Owner hereunder, lhe Township shall, in addition to any other remedy available to it, be at liberty to utilize the provisions of Section 325 of the Municipal Act, R,S.O, 1980, Chapter 302, as amended. 7. t~-~II~RATI~N The Owner consents to the registration of this Agreement by the Township, upon the title of lhe subject lands, at the expense of the Owner and agrees to execute such further and other documents, consents or applications, as required, for the purpose of securing registration and giving effect to the provisions of this Agreement. 6 8. BINDING EFFECT This Agreement. and everyihing contained herein, shall be binding upon the successors and assigns of the parties hereto, and upon the lands described in Schedule "A", attached hereto, such Schedule being a legal description of the lands, and it is further agreed that this Agreement shall be prepared, approved and registered on title, 9. SEVERABILITY OF CLAUSES Should any section, subsection, clause, paragraph. or provision of this Agreemenl be declared by a Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validily of the Agreement as a whole or any part thereof, other than lhe provision so declared to be invalid, 10. SAVE HARMLESS The Owner, on behalf of itself, its successors and assigns, agrees to indemnify and save harmless, lhe Township from and against any and all claims, suits, actions and demands whatsoever, which may arise either directly or indirectly by reason of any work or service performed by the Township, its servants or sub-contractors in order to complete the work or services required to be compleled under this Agreement, provided the subject matter of such action, suits, claims or demands was not caused intentionally or through gross negligence on the part of the Township, ils servants or agents or sub-contractors. IN WtTNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereunto have affixed their respective seals under the hands of their proper officers duly authorized in that behalf. // z:;i.. SIGNED, SEALED AND DELIVERED ) "/7;,,;,,,","; , ) Owner: 1045942 Ontario Inc. ) Ken Hewitt ) Has the Authority to Bind the Corporation ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) The Corporation of the ) Township of Oro-Medonte ) ) per: ) ) ) ) J. Neil Craig, Mayor ) \ ) ) Marilyn Pennycook, Clerk ) 7 SCHEDULE "A" ~ NOTE: It is understood and agreed that this Schedule forms part of the Site Plan Agreement between the Township of Oro-Medonte and 1045942 Ontario Inc. (Ken Hewitt). LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF LANDS Part of the West y, and SE V. of Lot 1, Concession 14, being Parts 1, 2 and 3, 51R- 6268, being all of PIN #58530-0316 (Lt), Roll # 4346-020-004-23200-0000. 8 SCHEDULE"B" NOTE: It is understood and agreed that this Schedule forms part of the Site Plan Agreement between the Township of Oro-Medonte and 1045942 Ontario Inc. (Ken Hewitt), SITE PLAN Site Plan is not in a registerable form and is available from the Township of Oro-Medonte. Drawing #E-1332 prepared by Dearden & Stanton Ltd. daled May 3, 2004. 9 SCHEDULE "C" NOTE: It is understood and agreed that this Schedule forms part of the Site Plan Agreement between the T own?hip of Oro-Medonte and 1045942 Ontario Inc. (Ken Hewitt). DEEDS AND EASEMENTS TO BE CONVEYED All title documents shall be properly drawn and execuled by lhe parties, with the appropriate Lot or Block Number inserted in the description of the document, and the registered Plan Number shall be left blank, to be inserted by lhe solicitors for the parties after lhe Plan is registered and a Plan Number assigned. The consideration for all conveyances shall be the sum of Two Dollars ($2.00) and the cost of preparation, execution and registration thereof, shall be borne by the Owner. All documents to be registered shall be prior approved by the solicitor for lhe Township. The following land and easement shall be conveyed: 1.0 LANDS TO BE CONVEYED TO THE TOWNSHIP N/A 2.0 DRAINAGE EASEMENTS TO BE CONVEYED TO THE TOWNSHIP N/A 10 SCHEDULE "D" NOTE: It is understood and agreed that this Schedule forms part of the Site Plan Agreement between lhe Township of Oro-Medonte and 1045942 Ontario Inc, (Ken Hewitt), ITEMIZED ESTIMATE OF COST OF CONSTRUCTION 1. ITEMIZE CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE AMOUNT 2. LETTERS OF CREDIT AMOUNT Letter of Credit to be provided by the Owner $1,000.00 to ensure completion of all works required (refundable deposit) under the terms of this Agreement, as noted in Sections 5 and 1 f) herein. II - \ Committee of Adiustment Minutes Thursdav March 10.2005.9:30 a.m. In Attendance: Chairman Allan Johnson, Member Lynda Aiken, Member Dave Edwards, Member Michelle Lynch, and Director of Planning Andria Leigh. Absent Member: Garry Potter Absent Staff: Junior Planner/Acting Secretary-Treasurer Andy Karaiskakis 1. Communications and Correspondence Correspondence to be addressed at the time of the specific hearing. 2. Disclosure of Pecuniary Interest None declared 3. Hearinas: 9:30 Robert Marchessault & Teresa Cullen 2005-A-04 Cone. 5, West Part Lot 16 (Oro) 108815/16 Sideroad West In Attendance: Mr. Robert Marchessault & Ms. Teresa Cullen, applicants BE IT RESOLVED that: Moved by Dave Edwards, seconded by Michelle Lynch "That the Committee hereby Approve Minor Variance Application 2005-A-04, subject to the following conditions: 1. That an Ontario Land Surveyor provide verification to the Township of compliance with the Committee's decision by 1) pinning the footing and 2) verifying in writing prior to pouring of the foundation so that the addition be no larger than 48.5 m2 (522 ft2) and the addition be located no closer than 2.0 metres (6.5 feet) from the interior side yard; 2. That the setbacks be in conformity with the dimensions as set out in the application and on the sketches submitted with the application and approved by the Committee; and, 3. That the appropriate building permit be obtained from the Township's Chief Building Official only after the Committee's decision becomes final and binding, as provided for within the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c. P. 13. .. ...Carried." Committee of Adjustment-March 1 0, 2005 Page 1 - 9:40 Roger Oatley 2005-A-05 Conc.1, Plan 1561, Lot 5, Part of Lot 6 (Oro) 15 Georgina Drive In Attendance: Mr. Ted Handy, architect, and Mr. Roger Oatley, applicant BE IT RESOLVED that: Moved by Dave Edwards, seconded by Lynda Aiken "That the Committee hereby Approve Minor Variance Application 2005-A-05 subject to the following conditions: 1. The proposed dwelling shall be setback no closer than 10 metres (32.8 feet) from the slope crest; 2. That the vegetative cover be maintained on the slope and that the slope not be steepened and fill materials should not be placed on the slope, as per the Geotechnical Slope Stability Analysis prepared by Terraprobe Limited dated February 17, 2005; 3. That the setbacks be in conformity with the dimensions as set out in the application and on the sketches submitted with the application and approved by the Committee; 4. That an Ontario Land Surveyor provide verification to the Township of compliance with the Committee's decision by 1) pinning the footing and 2) verifying in writing prior to pouring of the foundation that the proposed dwelling be no closer than 10 metres (32.8 feet) from the slope crest; and, 5. That the appropriate building permit be obtained from the Township's Chief Building Official only after the Committee's decision becomes final and binding, as provided for within the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P. 13. .. ...Carried." Committee of Adjustment-March 10, 2005 Page 2 """"' 9:50 1267866 Ontario Ltd 2005-B-04 Cone. 8, Part Lot 16 757 Line 7 N. (Oro) In Attendance: Ms. Josephine Martensson-Hemsted and Mr. John Martensson, applicants, Mr. Doug McBride, neighbour BE IT RESOLVED that: Moved by Lynda Aiken, seconded by Dave Edwards "That the Committee hereby Grant Provisional Consent regarding Application 2005-B-04 subject to the following list of conditions: 1. That three copies of a Reference Plan for the subject lands indicating the severed parcel be prepared by an Ontario Land Surveyor be submitted to the Secretary-Treasurer; 2. That the applicant prepare and submit a copy of the proposed conveyance for the parcel severed, for review by the Municipality; 3. That all municipal taxes be paid to the Township of Oro-Medonte; and, 4. That the conditions of consent imposed by the Committee be fulfilled within one year from the date of the giving of the notice. .. ...Carried." Committee of Adjustment-March 10, 2005 Page 3 10:00 Crescent Construction Limited 2005-B-05 Cone. 11, Part Lots 10 & 11 (Medonte) 1160 Mount St. Louis Road E. In Attendance: Mr. Murray George Vivian, neighbour, and Robert Gray, neighbour BE IT RESOLVED that: Moved by Dave Edwards, seconded by Michelle Lynch "That the Committee hereby Grant Provisional Consent regarding Application 2005-B-05 subject to the following conditions: 1. That three copies of a Reference Plan for the subject land indicating the severed parcel be prepared by an Ontario Land Surveyor be submitted to the Secretary-Treasurer; 2. That the applicant's solicitor prepare and submit a copy of the proposed conveyance for the parcel severed, for review by the Municipality; 3. That the severed lands be merged in title with Part 1 on RP 51 R022304 and that the provisions of Subsection 3 or 5 of Section 50 of The Planning Act apply to any subsequent conveyance or transaction involving the subject lands; 4. That the applicants solicitor provide an undertaking that the severed lands and the lands to be enhanced will merge in title; 5. That all. municipal taxes be paid to the Township of Oro-Medonte; and, 6. That the conditions of consent imposed by the Committee be fulfilled within one year from the date of the giving of the notice. .....Carried." Committee of Adjustment-March 1 0, 2005 Page 4 10:10 Horseshoe Valley Resort 2005-B-06 Conc.3, Part East Half Lots 1 & 2, being Parts 2, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15,18,21 & 31 on RP 51R-32830 (Medonte) In Attendance: Ms. Ellen Dunn, representing Horseshoe Valley Resort BE IT RESOLVED that: Moved by Michelle Lynch. seconded by Dave Edwards "That the Committee hereby Grant Provisional Consent regarding Application 2005-B-06 for the proposed easement to the New Millennium Homes Condominium Project subject to the following conditions: 1. That the applicant prepare and submit a copy of the proposed conveyance for the parcel severed, for review by the Municipality; and 2. That the conditions of consent imposed by the Committee be fulfilled within one year from the date of the giving of the notice. .....Carried." Committee of Adjustment.March 10, 2005 Page 5 10:20 Carl Campitelli & Giovanni Campitelli 2005-8-07 Cone. 6, Part Lot 7, Part 1 on RP 51R-15836 (Medonte) In Attendance: Mr. Carl Campitelli, applicant, Mr. Robert Shannon, neighbour, Mr. Mark Phillips, neighbour, and Mr. Ed Balko, neighbour BE IT RESOLVED that: Moved by Dave Edwards, seconded by Lynda Aiken "That the Committee hereby Grant Provisional Consent regarding Application 2005-B-07 subject to the following list of conditions: 1. That three copies of a Reference Plan for the subject lands indicating the severed parcel be prepared by an Ontario Land Surveyor be submitted to the Secretary-Treasurer; 2. That the applicant prepare and submit a copy of the proposed conveyance for the parcel severed, for review by the Municipality; 3. That all municipal taxes be paid to the Township of Oro-Medonte; 4. That the applicant pay a cash-in-lieu of parkland levy in the amount of $ 2000.00 in accordance with By-law 2004-076; 5. That the applicants obtain an entrance permit from the Roads Department; 6. That the applicants prepare an Environmental Impact Study (EIS) required under Section 3.7.6 of the County Official Plan, to the satisfaction of the County and Township; 7. That the applicant pay a Development Charges Fee to the Township in the amount determined by Council as of the date the fee is received by the Township; and; 8. That the conditions of consent imposed by the Committee be fulfilled within one year from the date of the giving of the notice. .. ...Carried." Committee of Adjustment-March 10,2005 Page 6 C\ - 10:30 Tim & Shelley Pierce 2005-A-06 Plan 1464, Lot 76 (Oro) 3 Mazepa Place In Attendance: Mr. Tim Pierce and Ms. Shelley Pierce, applicants BE IT RESOLVED that: Moved by Lynda Aiken, seconded by Michelle Lynch "That the Committee hereby Approve Minor Variance Application 2005-A-06 as follows: THAT PERMISSION TO EXPAND A LEGAL NON-COMPL YING STRUCTURE IS GRANTED FOR 3 MAZEPA PLACE FOR A 148.6 M2 (1600 FT2) TWO STOREY ADDITION ONTO AN EXISTING DWELLING and subject to the following conditions: 1. That the setbacks be in conformity with the dimensions as set out in the application and on the sketch submitted and approved by the Committee; 2. That the proposed addition be located no closer than 1.7 metres (5.6 feet) from the interior side lot line, 3. That the applicants apply for and obtain approval for the combined application for Site Plan Control/Removal of the Holding Provision; 4. That the applicants satisfy the comments from the Building Department regarding sewage system approvals; 5. That an Ontario Land Surveyor provide verification to the Township of compliance with the Committee's decision by 1) pinning the footing and 2) verifying in writing prior to pouring of the foundation by way of survey/real property report so that the proposed addition be no closer than 1.7 metres (5.6 feet) from the interior side lot line; and, 6. That the appropriate building permit be obtained from the Township's Chief Building Official only after the Committee's decision becomes final and binding, as provided for within the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P. 13. .....Carried." Committee of Adjustment-March 10, 2005 Page 7 - 10:40 Donald & Sherry Hubbert 2005-B-08 Cone. 6, Part Lot 7, Part 1 on RP 51R-15836 (Medonte) In Attendance: Mr. Don Hubbert and Ms. Sherry Hubbert, applicants BE IT RESOLVED that: Moved by Lynda Aiken, seconded by Michelle Lynch "That the Committee hereby Grant Provisional Consent regarding Application 2005-B-08 subject to the following list of conditions: 1. That three copies of a Reference Plan for the subject lands indicating the severed parcel be prepared by an Ontario Land Surveyor be submitted to the Secretary-Treasurer; 2. That the applicant prepare and submit a copy of the proposed conveyance for the parcel severed, for review by the Municipality; 3. That all municipal taxes be paid to the Township of Oro-Medonte; and, 4. That the conditions of consent imposed by the Committee be fulfilled within one year from the date of the giving of the notice. .. ...Carried." Committee of Adjustment-March 1 0, 2005 Page 8 6. Other Business i. Revise decision for 2005-A-01 (Vandergeest) COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT DECISION to MODIFY CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL WHEREAS Committee deems it necessary to clarify the conditions of the minor variance and finds the modifications to be minor and of a technical nature, and WHEREAS Committee deems the changes to the conditions to be minor and therefore no Notice of the change to conditions is required; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that: Moved by Dave Edwards, seconded by Michelle Lynch "That the Conditions to Minor Variance Application 2005-A-01 be modified to state: THAT PERMISSION TO EXPAND A LEGAL NON-COMPLYING STRUCTURE IS GRANTED FOR 847 LINE 3 NORTH FOR A 74.4 M2 (801 FT2) SINGLE STOREY ADDITION ONTO AN EXISTING DWELLING and subject to the following conditions: 1. That the setbacks be in conformity with the dimensions as set out in the application and on the sketch dated December 14, 2004 and approved by the Committee; 2. That an Ontario Land Surveyor provide verification to the Township of compliance with the Committee's decision by 1) pinning the footing and 2) verifying in writing prior to pouring of the foundation so that the addition be no larger than 74.4 m2 (801 fe); and, 3. That the appropriate building permit be obtained from the Township's Chief Building Official only after the Committee's decision becomes final and binding, as provided for within the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P. 13. .....Carried." Committee of AdjustmentMMarch 10,2005 Page 9 ii. Adoption of minutes for February 10, 2005 Meeting - Moved by Dave Edwards, Seconded by Lynda Aiken "That the minutes for the February 10th 2005 Meeting be adopted as printed and circulated .. .Carried." iii. Appointment of Secretary-Treasurer Moved by Lynda Aiken, Seconded by Dave Edwards "That the Committee hereby appoints Andy Karaiskakis as Secretary- Treasurer for the Committee of Adjustment. ...Carried." 7. Adiournment Moved by Michelle Lynch, Seconded by Lynda Aiken "We do now adjourn at 11 :55 a.m." ... Carried." (NOTE: A tape of this meeting is available for review.) Chairperson, Secretary-Treasurer, Allan Johnson Andy Karaiskakis Committee of Adjustment.March 10, 2005 Page 10 , - TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE REPORT Dept. Report No. To: Prepared By: PD 2005-006 Committee of the Whole Andy Karaiskakis, Junior Planner Subject: Department: Council Zoning By-law Amendment for Planning C.ofW. Dale Plant Concession 9, Part of Lot 10 (Oro) Date: Motion # 11~ A.M. File No. Date: D14014161 II BACKGROUND: 1- The purpose of this report is to consider the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment application submitted by Dale Plant. The intent of this application was to rezone a parcel of land that was severed by the Committee of Adjustment for institutional purposes in September 2004. The application applies to lands legally described as Concession 9, Part of Lot 10, in the Township of Oro-Medonte (formerly Oro). The intent of the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment is to rezone the subject lands from the Agricultural/Rural (A/RU) Zone to the Institutional (I) Zone. II ANALYSIS: I' In September 2004, the Committee of Adjustment granted a consent application to sever and convey a portion of the agricultural land to the lands directly to the east having an area of approximately 1 hectares (2.5 acres) which was intended to be utilized for institutional purposes. As the parcel was currently zoned Agricultural/Rural (A/RU), the Committee of Adjustment included a condition in their decision that required the severed lot to be rezoned to an institutional zone to reflect the intended usage. , - The applicant submitted the application for rezoning and a public meeting as required by the Planning Act was held on February 21, 2005. Written comments were received from Simcoe County District School Board indicating that they had no objection to the approval of the proposed re-zoning. The proposed Zoning By-law Amendment would conform with the intent and policies of the Oro-Medonte Official Plan and the County of Simcoe Official Plan. On this basis, it is recommended that a Zoning By- law Amendment be given favorable consideration by Council. II RECOMMENDATION (S): I~ 1. THAT this report be received and adopted; and 2. That a zoning by-law amendment for Dale Plant, that would rezone the lands described as Part of Lot 10, Concession 9 (Oro), on Schedule A13 of Zoning By-law 97-95, as amended from the Agricultural/Rural (A/RU) Zone to the Institutional (I) Zone be given favorable consideration; and 3. That the Clerk bring forward the appropriate by-law for Council's consideration. Respectfully submitted, A~~;' Junior Planner Reviewed and approved by, --1~ ~ Andria Leigh, MCIP, RPP Director of Planning / C.A.O. Comments: Date: ~\o..Aj II 0,,':, \ " ()~" (\~ I \ IU. U \ / C.A.O. Dept. Jead 2 . . THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF ORO-MEDONTE BY-LAW NO. 2005- Being a By-law to change the zoning on lands within Concession 9, Part of Lot 10 (Oro) now in the Township of Oro-Medonte (Plant - Roll # 43-46-010- 004-05500-0000). WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte is empowered to pass By-laws to regulate the use of land pursuant to Section 34 of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.P.13. AND WHEREAS Council deems it appropriate to re-zone the lands to permit the development of institutional uses, in accordance with Section 02 of the Official Plan AND WHEREAS Council deems it appropriate to place the subject land in a zone with permitted uses that are better suited for the subject lot: NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte enacts as follows: 1. Schedule 'A13' to Zoning By-law No. 97-95 as amended, is hereby further amended by changing the zone symbol applying to the lands located in Concession 9, Part of Lot 10, in the former geographic Township of Oro, now in the Township of Oro-Medonte, from the Agricultural/Rural (A/RU) Zone to the Institutional (I) Zone as shown on Schedule 'A-1' attached hereto and forming part of this By-law. 2. This By-law shall come into effect upon the date of passage hereof, subject to the provisions of the Planning Act, as amended. READ A FIRST AND SECOND TIME on the 6th day of April, 2005. READ A THIRD TIME and finally passed this day of April, 2005. J. Neil Craig, Mayor Marilyn Pennycook, Clerk . . ~ Schedule 'A-11 to By-Law This Is Schedule 'A-1' to By-Law 2005- passed the day of Mayor J. Neil Craig Clerk Marilyn Pennycook 1 CON IX lOT 10 LANDS SUBJECT TO THE RE-lONING O~O ~<(;. '" 'C~0'" O\"O 100 0 1111,1 """'- TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE REPORT Dept. Report No. To: Council Prepared By: PD 2005-010 Wesley R. Crown, MCIP, RPP Subject: Department: Planning Council Telecommunications Tower Siting Protocol C.ofW. Date: February 9, 2005 Motion R.M. File #: # Date: Roll #: II PURPOSE II To obtain Council approval of the "Oro-Medonte Telecommunications Siting Protocol" as the guideline for providing municipal comments on proposals for the construction of new telecommunications facilities within the Township. II BACKGROUND II All telecommunications facilities, including cellular/wireless towers, are federally regulated installations and require approval from Industry Canada. As a federally regulated industry local municipalities, including the Township of Oro-Medonte, have no approval authority with respect to the location and construction of telecommunications facilities. Industry Canada does require, as part of its review and approval process, that the telecommunications provider obtain comments from the local land use planning authority. 1 ( - Generally, the Municipality's comments with respect to proposed telecommunications facilities is limited to a determination of concurrence or non-concurrence with the proposed facility based on land use impacts. While Industry Canada will take into consideration the Township's comments with respect to the proposed facility, approval by the Township is not required for Industry Canada approval of the telecommunications facility. Historically, the Township of Oro-Medonte, has been receiving and commenting on applications for telecommunications facilities without a formal policy or guideline with respect to how applications will be evaluated or how comments will be provided. In addition, there is no Council policy whether or not public consultation is required as part of the local review process. Many municipalities have been establishing formal "protocols" with respect to how they would receive, review, evaluate and provide comments with respect to telecommunications facilities. The main objectives of the Siting Protocols are as follows: . Provide a clear description of the Township's preferences for the siting of telecommunications facilities: . Establish an administrative process for the provision of Municipal comments on proposed new telecommunications facilities; . Establish a clear process for proponents of telecommunications facilities with respect to obtaining written comments from the Township; and, . Establish a requirement for a public consultation meeting as part of the consideration of requests for comment on significant telecommunication facilities. The Township has been working in a co-operative manner with the three major cellular providers in reviewing and drafting the proposed Protocol. The intent of this co-operation is to achieve a Siting Protocol that is acceptable to not only the Township, but also the proponents of the majority of new telecommunication tower facilities in the Township. It is through this co-operative process that the Municipality will best achieve its land use objectives as they relate to the construction and location of telecommunications facilities in the Municipality. Attached to this report is the proposed Telecommunications Siting Protocol prepared by Meridian Planning Consultants. A draft of the protocol was circulated to Mr. Stephen D'Agostino of Thomson Rogers, Solicitor for Bell Mobility, Rogers Cellular, and Telus Incorporated. The cellular providers are in substantial agreement with the Protocol as currently drafted. II PROPOSED PROTOCOL II The proposed Protocol balances the requirements of Industry Canada for consultation with the land use authority, the requirements of the proponents of telecommunication tower facilities for certainty in the consultation process, with the Municipality's need to protect those land use principles that are contained in its approved and adopted Official Plan and Zoning By-law. In addition, the Protocol establishes a requirement for public consultation for all new major facilities. The proposed Protocol balances these objectives in a manner that each of the parties to the process will have a clear understanding of their roles and responsibilities at various stages of the process. 2 t' """'" The Telecommunications Siting Protocol establishes a process whereby requests for comments on proposed telecommunications facilities are received by the Municipality and directed to one of two streams. Insignificant telecommunication facilities, which are defined in the Protocol, are permitted to proceed by way of a fast track review process and the provision of comments by staff in response to the requests. Significant telecommunication facilities, which include all those facilities which are not exempted under the proposed Protocol, will require a more detailed review and evaluation by the Township, including a mandatory public consultation process conducted by the proponent, and the submission of reports to Council for their final consideration with respect to the proposed telecommunication facility. Attached as Figure 1 to this report is a flow chart which illustrates the two stream approach to the consideration of applications for comment for new telecommunication facilities. The flow chart illustrates the various roles and responsibilities of staff and Council concerning the two types of applications and the timelines within which the Municipality would commit to the processing of both types of applications. The Protocol, like many Municipal Policy documents, provides both locations where the Municipality would support and encourage the establishment of telecommunications facilities, and locations that the Municipality would discourage the location of telecommunications towers and facilities. The Siting Protocol is very much based on the land use structure and principles that the Municipality has established in its Official Plan and Zoning By-law. For example, the Municipality has expended considerable effort in researching, evaluating and identifying the core natural heritage features of the significant Oro Moraine in the Township. The Township has identified this major land form feature as well as the major environmental functions that are supported by it as critical components of the Municipality. The proposed Siting Protocol discourages the location of telecommunications facilities within all significant natural heritage features, including the Oro Moraine, as designated by the Township Official Plan. In addition, the Siting Protocol discourages the location of telecommunications towers on prime agricultural land as designated by the Municipality's Official Plan. Again, the objective is to support the major policies in the Township's Official Plan to protect and preserve the agricultural resource base of the Municipality. The Siting Protocol, in Section 3.1, establishes a series of locations in the Municipality where telecommunications facilities are deemed to either be insignificant or to have limited land use impacts as a result of the context within which it would be located. For example, the location of telecommunications towers on existing buildings would be deemed to have little if any land use impacts and as such would be exempt from the formal public consultation and review process as set out in the Protocol. Additional areas that the Municipality would direct the location of telecommunications facilities, and thus exempt from the detailed consultation and evaluation process under the Protocol, include locations within 200 metres of the established haul routes in the Municipality, locations within 200 metres of Provincial highways but more than 200 metres away from existing residential uses, locations on existing aggregate sites, towers of less than 16.6 metres in height, new facilities co-located on existing towers, and facilities utilizing stealth design. In all of these instances land use impacts will be limited, and as such will be exempt from the full evaluation and consultation process as set out in the Protocol. Exempt facilities will be reviewed internally by staff and comments would be provided within a two week timeframe. The intent of the Protocol is to encourage the telecommunications proponents to find locations or approaches that would meet the exemptions in the Protocol thereby limiting the land use impacts and resulting in a quicker commenting process. 3 Significant facilities would be those telecommunications towers which would not meet the definition of insignificant and exempt under the proposed Protocol. Significant facilities would require a more detailed evaluation and consultation process prior to a determination of the Township's position under the Protocol. The proposed Protocol would require the proponent to submit a series of detailed drawings in support of the request for comments and would also require the proponent to conduct at least one public consultation meeting with those landowners immediately adjacent to the proposed telecommunications facility site. The Protocol establishes notice and signage requirements and a series of very specific tasks that must be undertaken by the proponent as part of the completion of the consultation meeting and the reporting to the Municipality on the results of the meeting. The Municipal staff assigned to undertake the work would prepare a detailed staff report along with the results of the consultation meeting for review and consideration by Council at the next available meeting. Where significant facilities are proposed, Council would be responsible for making the final determination with respect to the Municipal position regarding its concurrence or non-concurrence with the proposed location. This ensures that Council is directly involved in determining the Municipal position regarding those telecommunications facilities which have the potential to have land use impacts on adjacent and surrounding property owners. Through the establishment of a two stream process the proposed Telecommunications Siting Protocol will encourage proponents to locate their facilities on sites that meet the locational criteria as established by Council, and also ensure that significant facilities which do not meet the exemption criteria in the Protocol will receive a thorough evaluation and determination by Council. The Protocol also makes it clear that the Director of Engineering and Environmental Services will be responsible for the administration of the protocol. II CONCLUSIONS I The Township of Oro-Medonte is served by two major north/south provincial transportation routes, Highway 400 and Highway 11, which are significant corridors for the location of telecommunication facilities serving the broader Ontario region. In addition, significant settlement areas in the Township also require telecommunication facilities to meet their cellular and wireless needs both now and in the future. While the Township has seen a significant number of telecommunication facilities in the past, it is very likely that the Township will continue to see additional telecommunications facilities as all three major cellular and wireless providers continue to expand their service networks both for the public travelling through the Township and for the residents and visitors to the Municipality. The proposed Telecommunications Siting Protocol provides a clear policy framework within which the Municipality can receive, consider, evaluate, and determine a position with respect to all future proposals for telecommunications facilities within the Municipality. The Siting Protocol will be a tool that can be used by staff, Council and telecommunication carriers in determining the appropriate location for telecommunication facilities and towers such that land use impacts may be eliminated and/or mitigated. The proposed Protocol attempts to achieve most of the land use objectives of the Municipality as currently enunciated in its Official Plan and Zoning By-law and in particular, attempts to protect the environment first principle as set out in the Municipality's Official Plan. 4 II RECOMMENDATION II It is therefore recommended to Council: 1. That Report PO 2005-010 be received and adopted; 2. That the Telecommunications Siting Protocol for the Township for Oro-Medonte dated February 2005 by Meridian Planning Consultants be approved: and 3. That the approved Protocol be provided to all telecommunications proponents for their use in submission of telecommunications proposals. Respectfully submitted, ---1 J -tV Wesley R. Crown MCIP, RPP Associate C.A.O. Comments: Date: C 010 culL vv 1\ 11 fl.,t ~<:Jf:L-; -'+-( '1 j !7105 C.A.O. Dept. Head C~ (1ttO f1J#J 17/0{- ~)? \~ . v- I 5 '" - \..D Draft Township of Oro-Medonte Telecommunication Facilities and Structures Siting Policy Prepared by: Meridian Planning MERIDIAN Consultants Inc. File: 2534 PlANNING CONSUlTANTS INC. February, 2005 - Throughout this document "telecommunications tower or facilily" will refer to any tower, guy wire. or structure facility associated with the sending or receiving of airwave (cellular) information. PART 1 - INTRODUCTION 1.0 PURPOSE The purpose of this document is to outline the process to be tollowed to tacilitate the establishment of new telecommunication towers or facilities in the Township of Oro-Medonte, This document will outline the areas of the municipality where telecommunication towers or facilities are encouraged as well as where they should not be directed, In addition, it will outline the procedures to be followed by telecommunications carriers when establishing significant new or significantly expanding existing facilities, 1.2 BACKGROUND Residents of Oro-Medonte and Ontario are becoming increasingly dependent on wireless communications to enhance their daily lives from both a business and personal perspective, Emergency response services such as 911, police, fire and ambulance services also rely on wireless communication to reduce response times and ultimately keep the municipality's residents safe, In order to increase the level of service that telecommunication carriers provide, there must also be an increase in the associated infrastructure, In anticipation of this increased demand. this policy has been developed by the municipality to not only mitigate the potential land-use conflicts between new large-scale telecommunication towers but also to encourage co-location, the use of existing structures (buildings, water towers, barns) and stealth design and unobtrusive design, In the future, as service providers scope-down and localize their networks, it is anticipated that stealth design in telecommunication towers will be the vehicle of choice for carriers, As a result, this policy encourages stealth applications in all areas of the municipality, Before stealth design becomes viable throughout the municipality, the municipality will promote co-location and unobtrusive design', It must be noted that co-location and unobtrusive design are mutually exclusive, Co-location towers are more bulky in order to support increased load and therefore a more obtrusive design, The municipality will work with service providers to determine which option is best suits each location, Emphasis will be placed on co-location, 1.3 ROLE OF THE MUNICIPALITY Telecommunications and telecommunication infrastructure in Canada fall under the jurisdiction of the federal government and as such. is regulated by Industry Canada, Through CPC-2-0-03, (Environmental Process, Radio frequency Fields and Land-Use Consultation), Industry Canada has recognized that local land-use authorities should have an opportunity to influence the location of telecommunication towers and facilities, Although Industry Canada requires consultation with land-use planning authorities, it is not obligated to act upon the recommendations of these authorities. It is therefore imperative that this policy establish a cooperative approach in its attempt to direct the siting of telecommunication structures and facilities to desired locations within the Township of Oro-Medonte, J Stealth Design refers to transmitters that are hidden within existing structures or designed to look like something else (i.e. flag pole or a tree) or designed to mirror the surrounding landscape. r\ TownshipofOro-Medonte ( ~I1ERIDIAN Page 1 Telecommunications Siting Protocol V ...-....~"""- February 2005 ( The Township of Oro-Medonte realizes the need for wireless communication infrastructure in the municipality and is excited about the opportunity to work in cooperation with the wireless service providers to develop site locations within the municipality, The Director of Engineering and Environmental Services for the Township shall administer this Protocol. 1.4 OBJECTIVES OF THE POLICY The placement of towers in most rural municipalities is the subject of much debate, particularly in areas where new services are being introduced, However, appropriate locations can be found in most instances when the municipality establishes a set of location objectives, On this basis and on the basis of Oro-Medonte's location in the County of Simcoe it is the objective of the Township to: . Encourage the review of all alternatives such as co-location and unobtrusive design and to only support the construction of new towers when all other possibilities have been exhausted, . Ensure that new towers are sited in a manner that respects the environmentally significant features, and significant sightlines of Oro-Medonte, . Locate towers as far away as possible from the existing dwellings . Ensure that new towers are sited to provide a high level of service, whenever possible and in keeping with the objectives of the Township Official Plan, . Encourage consultation between telecommunications carriers and the Township. Key items for discussion will include; optimal site location. the possibility of co-location, unobtrusive site design, and details of structure design, . Provide a forum that will inform the public as to the intentions of telecommunication providers in their community, . Provide telecommunication providers with a better understanding of the positive and negative site locating factors throughout the municipality, . Provide applicants with the Township's opinion of proposals (concurrence or non- concurrence) within 60 days of receiving an application, In addition, when a consultation process is required, complete the process within 120 days, PART 2 - IDENTIFYING OPTIMUM SITES LOCATIONS 2.0 LOCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES The municipality has identified areas of the Township where telecommunication towers or facilities would be best located to satisfy both consumer needs and have limited land use impacts, These areas include the Highway 400. and 11 corridors, areas zoned Mineral Aggregate Resource and existing tower locations, 2.1 LOCATIONAL CONSTRAINTS 2.1.1 Environmental - Directing Development Away From Environmentally Sensitive Features There are a variety of environmental constraints within Oro-Medonte including numerous wetlands, the Oro Moraine, Copelands Forest, Bass Lake and Lake Simcoe, Environmentally Sensitive Features are generally those lands designated Environmental //"0.,\ Township of Ora-Medonte (J !illlillAM Page 2 Telecommunications Siting Protocol February 2005 C Protection in the Township Official Plan or "Core Areas" in the Oro Moraine. It is the desire of the Township to direct the development of telecommunications towers away from these areas and lands zoned Environmental Protection in the Township's Comprehensive Zoning By-law. Over the past two years the Township has worked hard to develop policy to protect the natural heritage of the Oro-Moraine, In all possible cases. Oro-Medonte would like to direct the development of telecommunications towers outside the Moraine, The Township realizes that the Moraine covers an extensive portion of the Township and that Moraine features are prime locations for telecommunication structures and facilities. However, when a tower must be placed on the Moraine, carriers are encouraged to seek a location listed in Section 3.1, 2.1.2 Aeronautics - directing development away from Lake Simcoe Regional Airport Telecommunications towers and facilities must be situated in a manner that they are not disruptive to the ftight paths of the Lake Simcoe Regional Airport. 2.1.3 Agricultural - Discouraged within existing agricultural lands Agricultural lands are important to the Township and new telecommunication towers and facilities are directed away from actively cultivated agricultural lands. If towers and facilities must be located in agricultural areas, they are encouraged to explore options such as locating on barn tops, silos, windmills or other existing structures, Where new towers must be developed on prime agricultural land, a tower structure which causes a minimal loss of actively cultivated lands should be used, PART 3 - PROCEDURES 3.0 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS FOR CARRIERS All proposals for new telecommunication towers and modifications to existing towers where municipal consultation is required by Industry Canada. will require the submission of an application to the Township which shall include the following: 1, Written documentation from the Proponent (carrier) outlining the steps taken by the Proponent to investigate all non-tower options and why a tower option is the only viable alternative, A pre-consultation meeting with Oro-Medonte staff is strongly encouraged in conjunction with this exercise to provide guidance on process matters, siting opportunities and to provide direction on the appropriate balance between unobtrusive design and co-locatable design, 2, A full concept plan and elevation plan drawn to scale and dimensioned showing the subject property (or leased area if the property is not owned by the Proponent), site grading, the location of existing property lines. setback distances from existing or proposed buildings, property lines, fences, buffering, existing and proposed landscaping. access, parking, and type and height of the proposed tower structure, Any significant vegetation on a particular site should be inventoried on the plan, This is not a site plan as required by Section 41 of the Planning Act. Township of Oro-Medonte MERIDIAN Page 3 Telecommunications Siting Protocol IVN<NCcow.t.T.....,.."", February 2005 c ~ \ 3. Two sets of stamped engineered drawings of the tower design, In the case of roof mounted towers, a structural engineer's report may also be required to address the structural effects on the building. 4. A statement from the Proponent to indicate the need for the proposed tower height. 5, A map showing the horizontal distance between the tower installation and the nearest residential zone and/or residential dwellings. 6, A description of the proposed lighting scheme for the tower 7. Application for building permit, to address the following matters: a) Equipment shelters that exceed 10 square metres of gross floor area, b) Towers that are to be mounted or attached to an existing building, c) Towers that exceed 16,6 metres above ground level. (It is recognized that that antenna support structure and equipment buildings must comply with the National Building Code and that there is no jurisdiction on the municipalities part to issue a building permit, however, the carrier and the Township will cooperate with respect to this matter to the mutual benefit of both.) 3.1 EXEMPTIONS FROM PUBLIC PROCESS - PREFERRED DESIGN CHARACTERISTICS AND SITE LOCATIONS In an attempt to direct the siting of telecommunication towers and facilities and to encourage alternatives to tower structures, Oro-Medonte has developed the following list of site locations and structures that are exempted from the public process under this protocol. Carriers will benefit from selecting one of the following sites or facilities by a quicker municipal commenting process, . Stealth Design in existing structures of any size and new structures such as flag poles and street lights under 20m, . Co-location on existing sites or structures (Le, water towers) is encouraged and will be exempt from a public process provided that the proposed telecommunications facility or tower is not more than 8m above the upper most portion of the structure or more than 25% of the height of the original structure or tower, whichever is less, . Sites adjacent (within 200m of the right-of-way) to a designated haul route as defined in the Official Plan or Township By-law and located more than 200m from a residential dwelling, . In order to be exempted, sites in the following three locations must be located a minimum of the tower height plus 25% of its height away from any roadway (excluding guy wires which must be located no closer than 8m). All towers or facilities must be located 8m from the interior or rear lot line, . Sites zoned Mineral Aggregate Resource (MAR1),(Locations for facilities shall not impact the extraction or potential extraction of aggregate from the MAR1 zoned sites) . Locations adjacent to Highway 400 and Highway 11 corridors (within 200m of the right-of- way of either highway) and situated more than 200m from a residential dwelling Township of Oro-Medonte MERIDIAN Page 4 Telecommunications Siting Protocol ~-= February 2005 ~~ \ (locations within the highway right-of-way are under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Transportation,) . Ground support towers less than 16.6 metres in height and located more than 200m from a residential dwelling, . Locations on municipal buildings or lands, In cases where no public consultation is required, a letter of concurrence shall be provided by the Township within two weeks of receiving an application from the proponent to advise that the Township's requirements have been satisfied, 3.2 PUBLIC CONSULTATION PROCESS - OPEN HOUSE Public consultation will be required when proposed telecommunications structures do not meet the criteria for exemption listed in Section 3.1 When public consultation is required, the Township and the applicant will work together to ensure the public is made aware of the proposal and given and opportunity to voice any concerns, The format for public consultation will be an Open House meeting, The Open House will provide an opportunity to inform the public about the proposal, solicit their views on matters related to site impact mitigation and address any other concerns residents might have with the technology that is being used. 3.2.1 Roles of the Participants - the municipality and the carrier, a shared responsibility The Proponent shall erect a sign on the property notifying the pUblic of a proposal to establish a telecommunication facility on the property. The sign shall be erected on the property so that it is clearly visible and legible from the roadway and shall be a minimum 1,5m wide by 1,5m high and located a minimum 0.6m from the ground, Each sign shall be professionally prepared and contain the following wording: Figure 1 . Sign Wording Name of Applicant proposes to locate a telecommunications tower or facility, being (height) metres in height. on this property. Public Comment is invited An Open House information session is scheduled on (Date of meeting) from _to at the (location) For filrther information, contact proponent name and contact numher. The Township will post notice of the Open House on the municipal website, /++\ Township of Oro-Medonte (J t!lRJ!!!A~ Page 5 Telecommunications Siting Protocol February 2005 ~c. - \ The Township will provide the applicant with a list of land owners within a radius of 120m of the proposed telecommunication structure, The applicant will be required to prepare and distribute the notice which will include: 1. A location map of the proposed site, 2, Physical details of the tower including height, colour. lighting, type and design and the dimensions of property to be leased. 3. Name and telephone number of a contact person employed by the Proponent. 3.2.2 Open House - Procedural Requirements 1, The Open House will be convened by the Proponent and the municipality will be invited to attend, 2, The Open House shall occur no sooner lhan 20 days, and no later than 40 days, from the date that the notices are mailed and the sign erected, 3, The Proponent shall provide 4 colour photographs of the subject property (no smaller than 11"X 1 7") with a superimposed image of the proposed structure, The pictures shall face each of the north, south. east and west directions and be taken from a distance, from the base of the tower as specified by the municipality, 4, Following the meeting the Proponent shall: a) Provide a record of names, addresses and phone numbers of attendees; b) Provide a record of the meeting to identify the issues and concerns that were raised: and, c) Provide a follow-up letter to the Township to indicate their formal response to concerns raised during the public meeting. Should any modifications to the proposed structure be agreed to. then further details (revised plans or drawings) will be provided as soon as possible, 5, After the Proponent has satisfied the Open House requirements. the following procedure shall be followed: a) The proponent shall submit the results and a record of the Open House to the Township, b) A copy of the application, a municipal staff report, and record of the Open House will be provided to Council by municipal staff, c) Council will provide a Letter of Comment to Industry Canada which will; i) Indicate whether in the opinion of the Township, adequate public consultation has been conducted by the Proponent: ii) Indicate the Township's concurrence/non-concurrence based on probable land use impacts; and, Township of Ora-Medonie MERIDIAN Page 6 Telecommunications Siting Protocol ~~OM'$'NC February 2005 ( ~ \ ') iii) Where it is clear that the carrier has exhausted all attempts to resolve local concerns and disagreement still exists. provide formal notification of the impasse to Industry Canada. Note: This Protocol does not exempt any Proponent from obtaining other approvals as required by other federal, provincial, or municipal authorities, Township of OrowMedonte MERIDIAN Page 7 Telecommunications Siting Protocol ~-~ February 2005 FIGURE #1 -"4 ORO-MEDONE SITING PROTOCOL PROCESS STAFF REVIEW Determination if application meets exemption criteria of Section 3.1 Application circulated to all Application circulated to all Departments Departments and Notice to Council en ~ w W Proponent holds ~ Public Open House N Comments reviewed and assessed as per Section 3.2 (X) -i 0 .... Proponent submits record of I\) Open House to Township :E m Letter drafted and sent to Applicant m ;:II; en Summary' Report prepared by Staff for Council Council consideration Letter provided to Applicant either In concurrence or non-concurrence wllh proposed facility and location - \ CPC-2-0-03 Issue 3 June 24, 1995 Spectrum Management and Telecommunications Policy Client Procedures Circular Environmental Process, Radiofrequency Fields and Land-Use Consultation CanadaJ Aussi disponible en frangais - CPC-2-0-03 c\ c- \ Client Procedures Circulars describe the various procedures or processes to be followed by the public when dealing with Industry Canada. The information contained in these circulars is subject to change without notice. It is therefore suggested that interested persons consult the nearest district office of Industry Canada for additional details. While every reasonable effort has been made to ensure accuracy, no warranty is expressed or implied. As well, these circulars have no status in law. Comments and suggestions may be directed to the following address: Industry Canada Radiocommunications and Broadcasting Regulatory Branch 300 Slater Street Ottawa, Ontario KIA OC8 Attention: DOSP via e-mail: spectrum_pubs@ic.gc.ca All spectrum publications are available on the Intemet at: http://strategis.ic.gc.ca/spectrum c\ \ - I Environmental Process, Radiofrequency Fields and Land-Use Consultation CPC-2-0-03 Introduction Industry Canada recognizes the importance of considering the potential impact of antennas and their supporting structures on their surroundings. As such, the Department has instituted procedures for users of the radio frequency spectrum which give consideration to the following three areas: (i) the environment; (ii) Health Canada's Limits of Exposure to Radiofrequency Fields at Frequenciesfrom 10 kHz to 300 GHz, Safety Code 6 (referred to as Safety Code 6 from hereon); and (iii) land-use consultation. In January 1995, the Parliament of Canada proclaimed the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act (CEAA). This Act requires that federal government departments take into account environmental effects in the exercise of their mandate. Separate from this legislative requirement, Industry Canada has incorporated procedures to evaluate the radio frequency fields associated with radio transmitters. Tbe Department also requires that applicants meet the standards contained in Safety Code 6. Further, Industry Canada recognizes that land-use authorities may have an interest in the location of significant antenna structures proposed within their jurisdiction and may have legitimate concerns that should be considered in the exercise of authority under the Radiocommunication Act. These procedures were developed in consultation with the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency and take into consideration comments received from our request for public comment published in notice SMRR-001-92 of the Canada Gazette on February 15, 1992. Principle Industry Canada must exercise its spectrum management functions with due regard for the environment. Mandate Section 5 of the Radiocommunication Act states that the Minister may take into account all matters relevant to radiocommunication authorizations. The requirement for an environmental assessment is contained in section 5(1)(d) of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act. Policy Industry Canada will consider environmental effects and Safety Code 6, and will ensure that land-use authority consultation has been taken into consideration before issuing a site-specific radio authorization for significant antenna structures. 1 ~ -\i Environmental Process, Radiofrequency Fields and Land-Use Consultation CPC-2-0-03 Process Overview Applicants for site-specific radio authorizations are required to follow the procedures set out in this document before Industry Canada will issue an authorization. Technical information conceming specific issues related to broadcast applicants only, such as radio frequency exposure analysis, may be found in the Broadcast Procedures and Rules, Part I (BPR-I) and the appropriate BPR or BP for the specific service in which the broadcast station is operating. Owners of those stations that do not require site-specific radio authorizations are not required to file documentation, but have responsibilities as described in this document. Filing Requirements This table lists the minimum environmental and consultation information that must be submitted to Industry Canada. TYPE OF STATION SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS Type I Land, coast or earth stations that Preliminary Environmental require a site-specific radio station Information and Municipal/Land- authorization, including broadcast use Consultation Attestation undertaking stations to which the (Annex I). Broadcasting Broadcasting Act applies - undertakings also require a Radio site-specific Frequency Exposure Analysis. Type 2 Stations that do not require a site No specific filing procedure. specific authorization, e.g., Responsibilities are as described amateur, general radio service herein. (GRS) and satellite receiving stations - non-site-specific 2 C\( - \ Environmental Process. Radiofrequency fields and Land-Use Consultation CPC-2-0-03 General Procedures Environment This subsection applies only to Type I applicants as Industry Canada does not issue site-specific authority to Type 2 radio station owners. Both types are required to comply with the general procedures under the subsections entitled Radiofrequency Fields and Land-Use Consultation. Industry Canada expects that the installation or modification of radio stations will be done in a manner that complies with the CEAA. Most stations will have an insignificant environmental effect and will be excluded from the CEAA process. Applicants for site-specific radio stations are required to include a Preliminary Environmental Information and Municipal/Land-Use Consultation Attestation (Annex I) with each application. Where the applicant or Industry Canada identifies that the station does not meet the exclusion criteria established under the CEAA, further examination will be required. Should there be the potential for an adverse environmental effect, site-specific applicants will be required tu describe the effect and, where possible, propose mitigation measures, in compliance with the requirements ofthe CEAA and in consultation with Industry Canada. As well, an indication is required of whether the effect will occur during the construction, operation or modification phase. Industry Canada will ensure that the environmental assessment process is applied as early as is practicable in the planning stages so that environmental factors are considered in any decisions that may be made. We expect users of the radio frequency spectrum to give due consideration to potential environmental impacts. Examples of Adverse Environmental Effects The following are some examples of what may be considered adverse environmental effects: - detrimental effects on water bodies, ground water or soil; _ adverse effects on legislated protected areas such as national parks, historic canals or other protected areas; _ alteration, disruption or destruction of terrestrial and aquatic habitat for wildlife and fisheries; _ changes to current use oflands and/or quality oflands and natural resources for traditional purposes by aboriginal persons; - alteration of historical, archaeological, paleontological or heritage resources resulting from a change in the environment. 3 ( - Environmental Process, Radiofrequency Fields and Land-Use Consultation CPC-2-0-03 Radiofrequency Fields Published by the Department of Health and Welfare in 1991, Safety Code 6 contains recommended safety procedures for the installation and use of radiofrequency-emitting devices. Maximum exposure levels and durations of exposure are used to determine whether the signal emitted can be considered safe. We suggest that those considering a radio installation refer to Safety Code 6 for guidance. Industry Canada requires that radio stations be installed and operated in a manner that complies with Safety Code 6. Land-Use Consultation The purpose of this procedure is to ensure that land-use authorities are aware of significant antennas proposed within their boundaries. Industry Canada believes lhat local concerns related to land-use are important to the community, and that municipal and other land-use authorities should have the opportunity to make their views known with regard to radiocommunication antenna towers within their boundaries. Therefore, we have instituted procedures to ensure that municipalities and other land-use authorities are consulted prior to the building of significant antenna structures. In notice SMRR-002-90 published in the Canada Gazette on June 16, 1990, we published the requirement that applicants intending to install significant antenna structures notifY and consult with appropriate authorities. This consultation is intended to provide an opportunity to have land-use concerns addressed while respecting federal jurisdiction for the installation and operation of radiocommunication systems. However, federal jurisdiction in matters of radiocommunications cannot provide immunity from any action that may be taken by a land-use authority. When Industry Canada becomes aware of a land-use authority objection to a site-specific station, issuance of the licence will be delayed for a period of time sufficient for negotiations between the parties. While individual circumstances will vary, Industry Canada generally cunsiders that once a participating land-use authority is contacted, it should make its views known to the applicant within 60 days. Further, the consultation process should be completed within 120 days. The siting of antennas and their supporting structures is best dealt with in a spirit of co-operation, based on disclosure of the details to the land-use authority by those intending to install or modifY a significant antenna structure. Early cuntact ensures an opportunity for full consultation. To maximize the benefits of the consultation process, the parties should consider each other's requirements and work toward solutions that minimize the impact on the surroundings, including considering existing sites, while not unduly prohibiting the development of the radio facility. 4 ( ~ \ Environmental Process, Radiofrequency Fields and Land-Use Consultation CPC-2-0-03 Roles of the Parties Involved Introduction The Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency, Industry Canada, the land-use authority and the applicant or radio station owner all have an important role to play. Full consultation can only be achieved through early contact by the applicant or owner with the other parties, and with the co-operation of everyone involved. The Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency The role of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency includes: - administering the environmental assessment process; - providing advice to federal authorities; - promoting uniformity and hannony in the assessment of environmental effects; and _ promoting or conducting research in matters of environmental assessment and encouraging the development of environmental assessment techniques and practices. Industry Canada The role of Industry Canada is to implement the provisions of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act and ensure that applicants for radio authorizations involving significant antenna structures disclose their plans to land-use authorities and that the process operates in a timely fashion. Industry Canada will provide information to both our clients and land-use authorities. This may include providing observations on the validity of land-use by-laws as they relate to radio installations. Industry Canada does not playa direct role in the consultation. The responsibility remains with the radio station applicant or owner and the land-use authority to work toward a mutually acceptable agreement. Applicanls for radio stations as well as owners of stations that do not require a site-specific radio authorization must disclose their plans for significant antenna structures to their land-use authority. Where required, it is expected that the parties will propose and examine alternatives and in so doing, will give consideration to each other's needs. Land-Use Authority Industry Canada does not require, nor does it have the power to require, the participation in this process by any land-use authority. The procedure does not have the effect of conferring any federal power on a land-use authority. Nor does it confer any right of veto. 5 ( Environmental Process, Radiofrequency Fields and Land-Use Consultation CPC-2-0-03 In the event that a proposal is opposed, the land-use authority may provide Industry Canada with a statement should it wish to do so. There is no specified form for statements of either concurrence or opposition. Clients The role of owners of Type I and Type 2 stations, as it relates to the environment, radiofrequency fields and land-use consultation, is contained in the sections which follow. These address specific procedures for each type of station. More generally, experience to date and industry market forecasts indicate considerable growth in the provision of spectrum-based telecommunication services. For the most part, the consumers of these services are concentrated in urban areas and along transportation corridors. Consequently, the providers of these services must, of necessity, locate their facilities in proximity to these concentrations and thus in proximity to each other and with largely coincident coverage areas. If all service providers were to act independently to establish separate antenna structures, the potential would exist for justifiable concem that the number of such structures within an area would be excessive. To avoid such a situation, Industry Canada expects applicants and antenna structure owners, along with industry associations, to work cooperatively in reaching agreements which allow for and encourage the sharing of antenna structures so as to minimize their number. Specific Procedures - Type 1 Site-Specific Stations Environment Type I applicants must submit a Preliminary Environmental Information Attestation (Annex I) with their application. Where the proposal is not excluded from CEAA assessment, the applicant must either (i) alter the proposal so as to minimize the potential for environmental impact to the point where the exclusion requirements are met, or (ii) participate in the CEAA assessment process as required by Industry Canada. The installation of a station must be stopped should any unforeseen adverse environmental effect become apparent. Radiofrequency Fields Part of ensuring that the station complies with Safety Code 6 includes determining the radiofrequency (RF) field that the station produces. The authorization process for Type I stations includes an initial analysis that considers the potential effect of the proposed station within the existing radio environment. Where the analysis indicates that the maximum RF field level permitted by Safety Code 6 may be exceeded, the applicant may be required to undertake mitigation measures. These measures may include reducing the transmitter power or duration of transmission, changing the type, direction or height of the antenna, or restricting access to areas near to the antenna. Where the calculation indicates that the proposed station will meet Safety Code 6, Industry Canada will continue the normal authorization process. 6 ~ Environmental Process, Radiofrequency Fields and Land-Use Consultation CPC-2-0-03 In installations where there may not be compliance with Safety Code 6, the applicant may be required to provide additional information to facilitate Industry Canada's analysis. Where this initial analysis is inconclusive, the applicant may be required to provide measurements or calculations to support the proposed station's compliance. Broadcasting undertakings are required to provide a radiofrequency exposure analysis with each application. Specific technical requirements are contained in Broadcast Procedures and Rules, Part I (BPR-I) and the BPR appropriate for the service in which the broadcast station is proposed. Land-Use Consultation All applicants for Type I stations must complete and submit a signed Municipal/Land-Use Consultation Attestation for new or modified antenna structures (Annex I). Applicants must consult with the municipal/land-use authority when proposing the installation of a significant antenna structure. In the event the applicant believes that the antenna structure is not significant and chooses not to cunsult, it will be with the acceptance of any consequences of this decision. The Municipal/Land-Use Consultation Attestation covers the following cases: agreement by both parties, non-response by land-use authorities, inconsequential installations and non-concurrence. Where Industry Canada receives proof of land-use authority concurrence, or an attestation that the proposed antenna is inconsequential (not applicable to broadcast undertakings), Industry Canada will continue to process the application. If the attestation indicates that the land-use authority has been consulted but has not yet made its views known, issuance of a licence may be delayed until the views of the land-use authority are known or a sufficient time has elapsed for it to have commented. Should the applicant attest to believing that the structure or change proposed to it is insignificant, and accepts the consequences of this decision, Industry Canada will continue to process the application. If an application is opposed by a land-use authority, Industry Canada will ensure that both parties have had sufficient opportunity to negotiate before entertaining a petition to issue the authorization. If the land-use authority and the applicant are unable to come to an agreement, it is the responsibility of the applicant to provide Industry Canada with a written submission detailing all actions taken to address the concerns of the land-use authority. The information required should include, but not necessarily be limited to: a chronological summary of all events (letters, meetings, consultations, etc.); the requirement for the establishment of the specific site in question; reasons for the proposed location; and a review of alternative locations considered and reasons for their rejection, including associated costs and technical analysis. This analysis may include pattern coverage maps, Safety Code 6 analysis or any other engineering study that may be deemed appropriate. 7 ~c-1'\ Environmental Process, Radiofrequency Fields and Land-Use Consultation CPC-2-0-03 Applicants for broadcast undertakings shall consult with the local municipality or land-use authority regarding the location of all proposed antenna towers. The following publications give further information about broadcast undertaking municipal consultation: Broadcast Procedures and Rules, Part II (BPR-II) Section C-IOA.2 Broadcast Procedures and Rules, Part III (BPR-III) Sections C-5.5.2, 0-1.3 and F-1.3 Broadcast Procedures and Rules, Part IV (BPR -IV) Sections C-5.5.2, 0-1.3, F-1.3 and H-2.2 Broadcast Procedure 23 (BP-23) Section 6.11 Specific Procedures - Type 2 Non-Site-Specific Stations Environment Type 2 stations are either exempted from the requirement to hold a radio station licence or are not issued a site-specific authority. For this type of station, Industry Canada does not approve the siting of the installation within the existing radio environment. As such, they are not captured by the requirements of the CEAA. Radiofrequency Fields Type 2 stations must comply with Safety Code 6. Where it is expected that the operation of the proposed station will result in non-compliance with Safety Code 6, mitigation measures as described for Type I must be pursued by the owner of the station. Land-Use Consultation Prior to the installation of an antenna structure for which it is felt that community concerns could be raised, owners of Type 2 stations must consult with their land-use authority. There is no specific procedure for this consultation, nor is there any requirement tu receive the prior approval from Industry Canada to construct the antenna or its supporting structure. Where the land-use authority concurs with the proposal, installation of the structure may proceed. Should the owner of the Type 2 station believe that the proposed structure or change proposed thereto is insignificant, and decide to proceed with the installation without consulting with the land-use authority, it must be with the acceptance of any consequences of this decision. Where the owner of a Type 2 station has consulted with the land-use authority but has not received a response, the owner may decide to either: - continue to pursue a decision from the land-use authority, or - proceed with the installation of the structure and accept any consequences of this decision. 8 c - Environmental Process, Radiofrequency Fields and Land-Use Consultation CPC-2-0-03 Industry Canada expects Type 2 radio station owners to address the concerns of the community in a responsible manner, and to consider seriously all requests put forward by the land-use authority. Where Industry Canada believes that the installation of an antenna structure is not appropriate within its surroundings, it may request submissions explaining why the structure should not be altered or removed. 9 ( - Environmental Process, Radiofrequency Fields and Land-Use Consultation CPC-2-0-03 Annex 1 Preliminary Environmental Information and Municipal/Land-Use Consultation Attestation Part A - Identification I, (the applicant), propose to install or modify the antenna(s) or antenna-supporting structure described herein: new structure, or modified structure, (address, description ofiocation), with the following coordinates: _0_'_" north latitude and _0_'_" west longitude. Part B - Preliminary Environmental Information Attestation The proposed antenna installation and supporting structure are: Yes No G G Within 30 metres of a water body including a wetland. G G Likely to release a polluting substance into a water body. G G In a national park or other federally protected area. G G A significant modification to an existing antenna installation. G G Attached to, or within 15 metres of, an existing building. G G Independent of an existing building and, individual1y, they or any supporting line have a footprint greater than 25m2. G G Located on Territorial Crown land requiring a pennit under the Territorial Land Use Regulations. I note that further study may be required where the proposed structure is not exc1uded from the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act and may have significant adverse environmental effects. Part C - Municipal/Land-Use Consultation Attestation (1)_ I have consulted with the municipal/land-use authority and have obtained their concurrence; (2)_ I have consulted, or will consult, the municipal!land~use authority on (date) and will forward any comments when received. I understand that this may delay the issuance of a radio authorization; (3)_ * I have not consulted with the appropriate municipal/land-use authority, as I believe that the structure or the change proposed thereto is insignificant. I accept any consequences of this decision; or, (4)_ I have consulted with the appropriate municipal/land-use authority and they do not concur. I now petition Industry Canada to consider the application based on the attached details of my consultation. * Not applicable to a broadcast undertaking. "1 dec1are that this infonnation is true, complete and correct to the best of my knowledge." Applicant's signature Title (if on behalf of a Company) Date 10 - ~~ - \ r'ie" i!t~,.- '-z.,' ~_' \:', ~ 4 <=;;'N ~ 1dJ ' ~ "',,' ,_,,,",_.~.,~~_~-,,.i_; _ ~~~4Po/ >".-~.,," TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE REPORT Dept. Report No. To: Prepared By: PD 2005-013 Committee of the Whole Andria Leigh, MCIP, RPP Subject: Department: Council Planning New Provincial Policy C.ofW. Statement (PPS) Date: March 3, 2005 Motion R.M. File #: # Date: RolI#: J BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: II In 2004, the Province gave Royal Assent to amendments to the Planning Act to change how the Provincial Policy Statements (PPS) are considered by planning authorities. The Province also released a draft PPS that significantly changes how planning authorities are supposed to plan for future growth. On March 1, 2005 the new PPS came into force and effect and applies to all applications commenced on or after that date. The purpose of this report is to summarize the impacts of the PPS on Oro-Medonte. The revised wording in the Planning Act now requires that all planning decisions are to "be consistent with", rather than "have regard for" the PPS. The PPS is intended to be read in its entirety with relevant policies being applied to each individual application. The PPS is also intended to reflect the diversity of all Ontario municipalities and is based on good planning principles. The Province is required to ensure that its resources (Natural heritage, Water, Agriculture, Minerals and Petroleum, Mineral Aggregate, and Cultural Heritage and Archeology) are managed in a sustainable way to meet the long term needs of its residents. . ~J -J There are a number of specific policies that will have an effect on Oro-Medonte and these are discussed below: 1. Expansions to settlement area only to be considered_at time of a comprehensive review (i.e. Official Plan review) therefore no Official Plan Amendments will be allowed for expansions. 2. Rural areas are now defined/policies have been established for the types of uses to be encouraged. The PPS is discouraging rural development and makes it more difficult to develop on private or partial services which could impact long term growth potential in the Township. 3. The co-ordination of planning matters which have potential cross boundary implications (i.e. Oro Moraine, watershed and groundwater) has now been incorporated into the policy statement. 4. New policies for population and employment projections that require the County in consultation with the lower tier municipalities to identify and allocate population, housing, and employment projections for lower tier municipalities and also to identify and provide policy direction to lower tier for cross boundary matters. Therefore not all municipal OP's will have a 20 year supply of land designated for growth as previously required. 5. Improved policies for employment areas which allow for the promotion of economic development within a municipality. 6. The promotion of public spaces, parks, and open space and the healthy communities that they can provide for are encouraged within the new policy statement. 7. Revised infrastructure policies that require planning for infrastructure to be integrated into the plan for growth review. Partial services will only be permitted to occur for infilling of settlement areas. Individual services only permitted for limited forms of rural development, generally maximum of 5 lots. 8. Policies that promote planning for lands uses in the vicinity of an airport to ensure the long term operation and economic role of the airport is protected have been added. 9. The promotion of alternative energy systems (i.e. (wind energy) in settlements, rural and prime agricultural areas in now incorporated into policies. 10. Improved policies for water resources including maintaining linkages between natural heritage, surface water, groundwater, and hydrologic functions and using the watershed as a means for planning reviews/ growth plans. 11. Lot creation in prime agricultural areas is further restricted as infilling lots and bona fide farm retirement lots are not longer permitted. The intent is to protect and promote these areas for agriculture and agriculture related uses. 12. New Mineral Aggregate Resources policies that indicate the demonstration of need for the resource (i.e. supply and demand analysis) is not to be considered in evaluating the establishment of a new aggregate operation. While the new policies highlight the importance of a number of provincial matters including the environment and aggregate, there continues to be no clear direction on how these policies should be balanced and prioritized when in conflict. It is clearly identified in the document that there is no implied priority in the order in which the policies appear. As Council will recall, this has long been of concern to the Township and was highlighted during the Oro Moraine Land Use Strategy and the Aggregate Management Plan exercises that were implemented through Official Plan Amendment No. 16. - 2 - . - II RECOMMENDATION(S): I 1. THAT Report No. PO 2005-013 regarding the new Provincial Policy Statement be received for information purposes. Respectfully submitted, --1J --(~ Andria Leigh, MC/P, RPP Director of Planning C.A.O. Comments: Date: ). ~~;;).)/O C.A.O. Dept. Head--~"~ - 3 - ~e-\ ~~ tOfOltO ;? ~~~/~~-,<"!~ ~ ~;;~( ~C,i (~ ~~' ~A~ '" - ~, "'V" "~>"J ".-""..,.,. , 4",&~$\" TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE REPORT Dept. Report No. To: Prepared By: PD 2005-022 Committee of the Whole Andria Leigh, MCIP, RPP Subject: Department: Council Planning County of Simcoe C.ofW. Decision on Shoreline Date: Policy Amendment March 14, 2005 Motion R.M. File #: # Date: RolI#: II BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: I On December 1, 2004 Council adopted Motion No. which endorsed policy amendments to the Shoreline designation specifically related to Section D1 0.3.8 - Limits of Shoreline Development of the current Official Plan. On February 9, 2005 the Corporate Services Committee at the County adopted a report from the Planning Department that recommended the shoreline policies for the Township of Oro-Medonte, identified as Non-Decision #1 for Official Plan Amendment #17 be approved and that a Notice of Decision be provided for in accordance with the Planning Act. A copy of the Notice of Decision is attached for the Committee's reference. The last date of appeal identified in the Notice was Monday March 7, 2005. It has been confirmed by the County that no appeals of these policies were received and therefore the amendments to Section D1 0.3.8 are now in force and effect. These amendments have been incorporated into the Township's Official Plan document. - II RECOMMENDATION(S): II 1. THAT Report No. PO 2005-022 regarding the Notice of Decision for amendment to the Shoreline policies of the Township's Official Plan be received for information purposes. Respectfully submitted, -1J -f,0 Andria Leigh, MCIP, R'PP Director of Planning C.A.O. Comments: Date: (~~ \1 \0';- ~"-c~ C.A.O. Dept. Head - 2 - ~"M"_._ 'A~ Mf FileNo: OM-OPA-0317 Date of Decision: February 9, 2005 Municipality: Township of Oro-Medonte Date of Notice: February 15, 2005 Location: All of Oro-Medonte Last Date of Appeal: March 7, 2005 NOTICE OF DECISION With Respect to an Official Plan Amendment Subsection 17(35) and 21 of the Planninq Act A decision was made on the date noted above to approve the shoreline policies for the Township of Oro- Medonte, formerly identified as Non-Decision #1 for Official Plan Amendment 17, and recently ratified by Township of Oro-Medonte Council on December 1, 2004. Purpose and Effect of the Official Plan Amendment The purpose of this amendment is to update the Official Plan policies of the Township of Oro-Medonte with respect to development in Shoreline areas. The effect of this amendment is these policies will be incorporated into the local Official Plan policies already in effect. A copy of the decision is attached. A copy of Item No. CS 05-043 is attached. When and How to File An Appeal When the Decision is Final Anv appeal to the Ontario Municipal Board musl The decision of the County of Simcoe is final if a be filed with the Clerk of the Countv of Simcoe Notice of Appeal is not received on or before the no later than 20 davs from the date of this notice last date of appeal noted above. as shown above as the last date of appeal. Getting Additional Information The notice of appeal should be sent to the Additional Information about the application is attention of Glen R. Knox, County Clerk, at the available for public inspection during regular address shown below and it must: office hours at the County of Simcoe at the (1) set out the specific part of the proposed address noted below, from the office of the official plan amendment to which the appeal municipality noted above, or by contacting the applies, County of Simcoe Planning Department at (705) (2) set out the reasons for the request for the 735-6901. appeal, and (3) be accompanied by the fee prescribed under Mailing address for Filing a Notice of Appeal the Ontario Municipal Board Act in the County of Simcoe amount of $125.00, payable by certified Administration Centre, cheque to the Minister of Finance, Province 1110 Highway 26, of Ontario, Midhurst, ON LOL IXO Who Can File An Appeal Only individuals, corporations or public bodies Attention: Glen R. Knox, County Clerk may appeal the decision of the County of Telephone: (705) 726-9300 - Ext. 246 Simcoe to the Ontario Municipal Board. An appeal may not be filed by an unincorporated association or group. However, a notice of appeal may be filed in the name of an individual RtCEIVED I who is a member of the association or group. FEe 1 B 2005 I , ORO-MEDONTE I TOWNSHIP Ole. - '4 M February 9, 2005 COUNTY OF SIMCOE CORPORATE SERVICES COMMITTEE RESOLUTION Delegated under the Authority of the Planninq Act MOVED BY: Councillor {, f-pOf,iN ~ , SECONDED BY: Councillor -' . uJ~ THAT the shoreline policies for the Township of Oro-Medonte, formerly identified as Non-Decision #1 for Official Plan Amendment 17, and recently ratified by Township of Oro-Medonte Council on December 1, 2004 be approved; AND THAT Notice of Decision be provided in accord nce with the Planning Act. Carried ~) Defeat tI p I v"d Q - h COUNTY OF SIMCOE \~~' J ITEM FOR: CORPORATE SERVICES COMMITTEE SECTION: Planning - Delegated Authority ITEM NO. CS 05-043 MEETING DATE: February 9,2005 SUBJECT: Oro-Medonte Official Plan Amendment 17 Non-Decision #1 (Shoreline Policies) RECOMMENDATION: THAT the shoreline policies for the Township of Oro-Medonte, fonnerly identified as Non- Decision #1 for Official Plan Amendment 17, and recently ratified by Township of Oro-Medonte Council on December I, 2004 be approved; AND THAT Notice of Decision be provided in accordance with the Planning Act. BACKGROUND: Issues Summary Over the past 2 years, the County has been working with the Township of Oro-Medonte as well as various agencies and stakeholders to work towards appropriate general updates and housekeeping policies for the Township's Official Plan. These policy changes were part of local Official Plan Amendment (OPA) 17. On November 10, 2004 the County's Corporate Services Committee approved OP A 17, as amended by County staff. The Committee also made two Non- Decisions, upon the request of the Township's Council. These Non-Decisions related to the following sections of policy: 1. Section DI0.3.8 (Section C5.3.4 in the consolidated Official Plan) "Limits of Shoreline Development" 2. Section D4 (Section D4 in the consolidated Official Plan) - "Water Taking" On December 1, 2004, the Shoreline policies were ratified by Township Council. These proposed policies were then submitted to the County for review (Schedule 1). During the review, County staff has consulted with the Township Planning Department and have proposed minor modifications to ensure confonnity with County policies and the intent of the County of Simcoe Official Plan (Schedule 2). FINANCIAL ANALYSIS: There are no financial implications to this item. . . February 9,2004 Corporate Services Committee CS 05-043 Page 2 SCHEDULES: The following schedules are attached and fonn part of this item. Schedule I _ Shoreline Policies as submitted to the County by Oro-Medonte. Schedule 2 _ Shoreline Policy Modifications as Proposed by the County. ~ ~ ~ ~ Schedule I to Schedule 2 to CS05~43 CS05-043 PREPARED BY: Nathan Westendorp APPROVALS: Date: Mark Aitken, Acting Chief Administrative Officer February 2, 2005 ,', Schedule 1 Corporate Services Committee CS 05-043 Page 1 SECTION D10.3.8 (Section C5.3.4 in consolidated OP) as ratified by Township of Oro- Medonte Council resolution and as submitted to the County of Simcoe for approval "The further expansion of the shoreline development area onto lands that are not designated Shoreline is not permitted by this Plan. Exceptions may be granted through the approval of an Official Plan Amendment if the expansion is small in scale and is focused on the shoreline or is considered to be infilling. Infilling is defined as development that abuts a developed area on two sides and/or is located within a block of land that is surrounded by public roads on at least three sides. The creation of strip development across from existing development on existing public roads is not contemplated by this Plan. Council may consider such minor amendments to the Official Plan to redesignate lands for such limited shoreline development, provided Council is satisfied that: a) The lots will have an area of 0.6 hectares or greater; b) The majority of the existing tree cover on the proposed lots is retained and protected as part of the approvals process; c) The development is compatible, in terms of scale, density and character, with existing development; d) The proposed lots, if located on the shoreline, have a water frontage of no less than 45 metres; and, e) The lots would conform to the general subdivision and consent policies of this Plan. For Plans of Subdivision that involve the creation of lots with water frontage, only a single tier of lots shall be created, all with water frontage, as set out in Section D10.3.6 of this Plan. In addition, no new lots with direct access to County Roads are permitted. If major development is proposed (which is defined as development that does not meet the above criteria), a detailed review of the entire shoreline area shall be carried out to determine if the proposed location is suitable and appropriate from a growth management perspective." . Schedule 2 Corporate Services Commillee CS 05-043 Page I SECTION D10.3.8 (Section C5.3.4 in consolidated OP) as ratified by Township of Oro-Medonte Council resolution and as submitted to the County of Simcoe for approval, is modified by the County of Simcoe to read as follows: "The further expansion of the shoreline development area onto lands that are not designated Shoreline is not permitted by this Plan. Exceptions may be granted through the approval of an Official Plan Amendment if the expansion is small in scale, and is either focused on the shoreline or is considered to be infilling. Infilling is defined as development that abuts a developed area on two sides and/or is located within a ~ parcel of land that is SII!'f@blF}€!@€I abuts,"" public roads on at least three sides. The creation of strip development across from existing development on existing public roads is not contemplated by this Plan. Council may consider such minor amendments to the Official Plan to redesignate lands for such limited shoreline development, provided Council is satisfied that: a) The lots will have aFt area €If g.~ J;;Js€taras @r €)fB@ter a minimum area of 0.6 hectares to a maximum area of approximately 1.0 hectare, except where larger sizes may be suitable because of environmental constraints or design considerations; b) The majority of the existing tree cover on the proposed lots is retained and protected as part of the approvals process; c) The development is compatible, in terms of scale, density and character, with existing development; d) The proposed lots, if located on the shoreline, have a water frontage of no less than 45 metres; and, e) The lots would conform to the general subdivision and consent policies of this Plan. For Plans of Subdivision that involve the creation of lots with water frontage, only a single tier of lots shall be created, all with water frontage, as set out in Section D10.3.6 of this Plan. In addition, no new lots with direct access to County Roads are permitted. If major development is proposed (which is defined as development that does not meet the above criteria), a detailed review of the entire shoreline area shall be carried out to determine if the proposed location is suitable and appropriate from a growth management perspective." *NOTE* All references to specific section/policy numbers as stated above may be modified for formatting purposes. ~~~ ~ ",~~-,,,------:.~~ ~" - \ i1 ~.r~\ ~o _, " 'ZJ...w, rJ!r- '''. _ ,.,~ ~,/" C;:J "'~"-~ Lr;;;~:c~";':~'_i:~-ijr ''''':;jt:~'''' TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE REPORT Dept. Report No. To: Prepared By: PD2005-23 Committee of the Whole Andria Leigh, RPP Subject: Department: Council Planning Houben, Development C.ofW. Application P-1/91 Date: Concession 10, West Part March 14, 2005 Motion # of Lot 10 (Oro) R.M. File #: D09 002901 Date: RolI#: 010-004-08700-0000 II BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: I The purpose of this report is to consider a request to proceed with a proposed Zoning By-law Amendment on the above noted property. This subject property is located north of the Old Barrie Road and east of Line 9 North and has an area of 46 acres. Development Application P-1/91 was submitted to the Township of Oro on December 31, 1991 for consideration of an Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment, and proposed plan of subdivision. The applications for the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments proceeded to a Public Meeting in accordance with the requirements of the Planning Act on April 7, 1993. The proposed plan of subdivision has not been substantially altered since that public meeting. The Official Plan Amendment (OPA #64) that redesignated the lands from the Agricultural designation to the Rural Residential designation was adopted by the Township of Oro by By-law 1993-046 on May 19,1993 and was approved by the Ministry of Municipal Affairs in March 1997. The intent of the OPA was to allow for the development of a 26 lot estate residential subdivision. The Plan of Subdivision was Draft Plan Approved by the Ministry of Municipal Affairs on March 10, 1997. The draft plan approval was subject to a number of conditions that are required to be satisfied prior to the plan being registered. One of the conditions required the rezoning of the subject property to ensure that the property is appropriately zoned to reflect the intended usage of the property for residential purposes. The proposed zoning by-law amendment (attached) would rezone the subject property from the Agricultural/Rural (A/RU) Zone to the Rural Residential One (RUR1) and Open Space (OS) Zones and therefore satisfy this draft plan condition. The Open Space zone will be applied to the Park, Walkway, Storm Water Management, and Fire Protection Blocks. - ,The Rural Residential One (RUR1) zone is the appropriate zoning for an estate residential subdivision as it requires minimum lot frontages of 45 metres (147.6 feet) and a minimum lot area of 0.4 hectares (0.98 acres) to recognize the larger lot frontages and lot areas provided on estate residential lots. The proposed M-Plan as prepared by the applicant's surveyor was reviewed to ensure that no exceptions to the standard zone requirements were necessary. All of the lots within the subdivision will comply with the minimum lot frontage and lot area requirements of the Rural Residential One (RUR 1) zone. The proposed Zoning By-law Amendment conforms with the policies of the Official Plan, as amended by OPA #64 and would satisfy Condition #9 of the draft plan approval received from the Ministry. It is not recommended that an additional public meeting be held on this proposal; as the required public meeting was held in accordance with the requirements of the Planning Act and the proposal has not been significantly altered since that time. On this basis, it is recommended that Council support the adoption of the attached Zoning By-law Amendment that would rezone the subject property from the Agricultural/Rural (AlRU) zone to the Rural Residential One (RUR1) and Open Space (OS) Zones. JI RECOMMENDATIONS: II It is recommended to Council: 1. THAT Report No. PD 2005-23 be received and adopted; and 2. That Council support the by-law to rezone lands located at Concession 10, West Part of Lot 10 (Oro) from the Agricultural/Rural (AlRU) zone to the Rural Residential One (RUR1) and Open Space (OS) Zones; and 3. That the Clerk bring forward the appropriate by-law for Council's consideration. Respectfully Submitted, --4~,- '~ Andria Leigh, MCIP, RPP Director of Planning C.A.O. Comments: Date: {V~\\(O~ , .QjDf\- C.)JJ-- C.A.O. I .J Dept. Head - 2 - C;\-\~3 THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF ORO-MEDONTE BY-LAW NO. 2005- Being a By-law to change the zoning on lands within Concession 10, West Part Lot 10 (Ora) now in the Township of Oro-Medonte (Houben - Roll # 43- 46-010-004-08700-0000). WHEREAS Zoning By-law 1997-95 was enacted to regulate the use of land and the character, location, and use of buildings and structures within the Township of Oro-Medonte; AND WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte deems it appropriate to further amend By-law 1997-95, as amended: AND WHEREAS this By-law is in conformity with Section 09 of the Official Plan of the Township of Oro-Medonte: AND WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte is empowered to pass By-laws to regulate the use of land pursuant to Section 34 of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.P.13. NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte enacts as follows: 1. Schedule 'A13' to Zoning By-law No. 97-95 as amended, is hereby further amended by changing the zone symbol applying to the lands located in Concession 10, West Part Lot 10, in the former geographic Township of Oro, now in the Township of Oro-Medonte, from the Agricultural/Rural (A/RU) Zone to the Rural Residential One (RUR1) and Open Space (OS) Zones as shown on Schedule 'A-1' attached hereto and forming part of this By-law. 2. This By-law shall come into effect upon the date of passage hereof, subject to the provisions of the Planning Act, as amended. READ A FIRST AND SECOND TIME on the day of April, 2005. READ A THIRD TIME and finally passed this day of ,2005. J. Neil Craig, Mayor Marilyn Pennycook, Clerk . ~{'-~ Schedule IA_11 10 By-Law This is Schedule 'A-1' to By-Law 2005- passed the day of Mayor J. Neil Craig Clerk Marilyn Pennycook I I I 1______ ~~~ I ~~~ II ~ ~ .--' ~ ~ .--' -r..m I ~ ~ .--' \ /;-- . ~ ~ .--' Z ~ ~ .--' \ !.,,"---....., ~~~ " ._--"~- ""... ~ ~ .--' .--' ~ ~ .--' ~ .--' .--' .~". . Z OLD BARRIE RO , ! , ~ ~ Z ..-- ".>, - , H I =] LANDS TO BE REZONED FROM THE , :=:= AGRICULTURAl/RURAL (AlRU) ZONE TO TH RURAL RESIDENTIAL ONE (RUR1) ZONE ~ LANDS TO BE REZONED FROM THE - ............-.-.-..-. AGRICULTURAl/RURAL (A/RU) ZONE TO TH OPEN SPACE (OS) ZONE ......-- - ...._e _~__,_.._.._. \ TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE MINUTES 2003-2006 TERM March 14, 2005 @ 7:04 p.m. Robinson Room / Council Chambers Present: Council Representatives Public Representatives Mayor J, Neil Craig Robert Barlow Deputy Mayor Harry Hughes Mel Coutanche Councillor Ralph Hough John Miller Councillor John Crawford Councillor Ruth Fountain Regrets: Councillor Paul Marshall Terry Allison Councillor Dan Buttineau Craig Drury Staff Present: Andria Leigh, Director of Planning; Janette Teeter, Clerk's Assistant Also Present: George Arnold, James Hayes, Eric Wormsbecker, Ian Watson, Cathy Underhill, George Anderson, Lester and Cristina Cooke 1. Opening of Meeting by Chair Mayor J. Neil Craig assumed the chair and called the meeting to order. 2. Adoption of Agenda Motion No. PAC-1 Moved by John Miller, Seconded by Robert Barlow It is recommended that the agenda for the Planning Advisory Committee meeting of Monday, March 14,2005 be received and adopted. Carried. 3. Declaration of Pecuniary Interest and the General Nature Thereof - in Accordance with the Act. None declared. - 4. Minutes of Previous Meetings - February 21, 2005. Motion No. P AC-2 Moved by Robert Barlow, Seconded by John Miller It is recommended that the minutes of the Planning Advisory Committee Meeting held on February 21 , 2005 be received and adopted. Carried. 5. Correspondence and Communication None. 6. Planning Applications (a) Planning Report presented by Andria Leigh, Director of Planning, Re: Helen Anderson - Part of Lot 9, Concession 14 (Oro), Application 2005-0PA-01 Motion No. PAC-3 Moved by Robert Barlow, Seconded by John Miller It is recommended that 1. Report PD 2005-015, Andria Leigh, Director of Planning, re: Helen Anderson, Development Application 2005-0P A-01 , Concession 14, Part of East Half of Lot 9 (Oro), Township of Oro-Medonte be received and adopted; 2. And Further That Official Plan Amendment Application 2005-0PA-01, Part of the East Half of Lot 9, Concession 14 (Oro), Township of Oro-Medonte be deferred until such time as favorable comments are received from the Ministry of Natural Resources that sufficient technical basis is available for the proposal. Carried. Planning Advisory Committee Meeting March 14. 2005, Page 2 ~ (b) Planning Report presented by Andria Leigh, Director of Planning, Re: Lester Cooke - South Part of Lot 17, Concession 3 (Orillia), Application P-159/03 Motion No. PAC-4 Moved by Mel Coutanche, Seconded by John Miller It is recommended that 1. Report PD 2005-014, Andria Leigh, Director of Planning, re: Lester and Cristina Cooke, Development Application P-159/03, Concession 3, South Part of Lot 17 (Orillia), Township of Oro-Medonte be received and adopted; 2. That the Planning Advisory Committee recommend to Council that Official Plan Amendment No. 19, Concession 3, South Part of Lot 17 (Orillia), Township of Oro- Medonte, submitted by Lester and Cristina Cooke be considered favorably for adoption; 3. And Further That the Planning Advisory Committee recommend to Council the favorable consideration of a by-law to designate Concession 3, South Part of Lot 17 (Orillia), Township of Oro-Medonte, as an Area of the Township subject to Site Plan Control. Carried. (c) Planning Report presented by Andria Leigh, Director of Planning, Re: 1071118 Ontario Limited (Robert DeRosa) - East Part of Lot 21, Concession 7, RP 51 R-15045, Parts 1 to 4 pt Part 5 Parts 8 to 10 (Oro), Application 2005- ZBA-03 Motion No. P AC-5 Moved by Mel Coutanche, Seconded by Robert Barlow It is recommended that 1. Report PD 2005-016, Andria Leigh, Director of Planning, re: Application 2005-ZBA- 03, 1071118 Ontario Limited (DeRosa), Concession 7, Part of Lot 21, 51 R-15045, Parts 1-4, Part 5, Parts 8-10 (Oro), Township of Oro-Medonte, be received and adopted; 2. And Further That the Planning Advisory Committee recommend to Council that Zoning By-law Amendment Application 2005-ZBA-03, Concession 7, Part of Lot 21, 51 R-15045, Parts 1-4, Part 5, Parts 8-10 (Oro), Township of Oro-Medonte proceed to a Public Meeting in accordance with the requirements of Section 34 of the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990 c.P. 13. Carried. Planning Advisory Committee Meeting March 14, 2005, Page 3 7. Other Business a) Public Meetings, March 21, 2005 7:00 p.m. 1) 2005-ZBA-05 [Duddy] 2) 2005-ZBA-06 [McLean] 3) 2005-ZBA-07 [Bidwell] 7:05 p.m. 4) 2004-0PA-02, 2004-ZBA-09, 2004-SUB-01 [Moon Point Corporation] b) PAC Meeting - April 11 ,2005 c) Public Meeting - April 18, 2005 8. Adjournment Motion No. PAC-6 Moved by John Miller, Seconded by Mel Coutanche It is recommended that we do now adjourn at 7:37 p.m. Carried. Chair, Mayor J. Neil Craig Director of Planning, Andria Leigh Planning Advisory Committee Meeting March 14,2005, Page 4 THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE q \ PUBLIC MEETING MINUTES Re: Proposed Amendment Zoning By-Law Application No. 2005-ZBA-05, Concession 11, West Part Lot 8, RP 51 R-33214, Part 1 (formerly Medonte), Township of Oro-Medonte, (Duddy) March 21, 2005 @ 7:05 p.m. at the Municipal Council Chambers of the Township of Oro-Medonte Present: Mayor J. Neil Craig Deputy Mayor Harry Hughes Councillor Dan Buttineau Councillor Paul Marshall Councillor Ralph Hough Councillor John Crawford Councillor Ruth Fountain Staff Present: Andria Leigh, Director of Planning; Janette Teeter, Clerk's Assistant Also Present: John Miller, Bob Barlow, Terry Allison, Mel Coutanche, Craig Drury, Stella Duddy Mayor J. Neil Craig called the meeting to order and explained the public meeting is to obtain public comments on proposed amendment to the Zoning By-Law. Notice of the Public Meeting was mailed to landowners within 120m of the specified site on February 23, 2005 and posted on a sign on the subject property on February 23, 2005. The following correspondence was received at the meeting: Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority dated March 2, 2005. Andria Leigh, Director of Planning, provided an overview of the proposed amendment to the Zoning By-Law. The following persons offered verbal comments with respect to the proposed amendment to the Zoning By-Law: None. The Mayor advised that written submission will be received at the Township office until March 22, 2005. There being no further comments or questions, the meeting adjourned at 7:07 p.m. A tape of the meeting is available for review at the Township Administration Centre, 148 Line 7 South. . THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE PUBLIC MEETING MINUTES Re: Proposed Amendment Zoning By-Law Application No. 2005-ZBA-06, Concession 4, West Part Lot 15 (formerly Oro), Township of Oro-Medonte, (McLean> March 21, 2005 @ 7:07 p.m. at the Municipal Council Chambers of the Township of Oro-Medonte Present: Mayor J. Neil Craig Deputy Mayor Harry Hughes Councillor Dan Buttineau Councillor Paul Marshall Councillor Ralph Hough Councillor John Crawford Councillor Ruth Fountain Staff Present: Andria Leigh, Director of Planning; Janette Teeter, Clerk's Assistant Also Present: John Miller, Bob Barlow, Terry Allison, Mel Coutanche, Craig Drury, John Vandrie Mayor J. Neil Craig called the meeting to order and explained the public meeting is to obtain public comments on proposed amendment to the Zoning By-Law. Notice of the Public Meeting was mailed to landowners within 120m of the specified site on February 23, 2005 and posted on a sign on the subject property on February 23, 2005. The following correspondence was received at the meeting: Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority dated March 2, 2005. Andria Leigh, Director of Planning, provided an overview of the proposed amendment to the Zoning By-Law. The following persons offered verbal comments with respect to the proposed amendment to the Zoning By-Law: John Vandrie. The Mayor advised that written submission will be received at the Township office until March 22, 2005. There being no further comments or questions, the meeting adjourned at 7:15 p.m. A tape of the meeting is available for review at the Township Administration Centre, 148 Line 7 South. , THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE \ PUBLIC MEETING MINUTES Re: Proposed Amendment Zoning By-Law Application No. 2005-ZBA-07, Concession 5, Part Lot 9, RP 51 R-33403, Part 1 (formerly Oro), Township of Oro-Medonte, (Bidwell) March 21, 2005 @ 7:15 p.m. at the Municipal Council Chambers of the Township of Oro-Medonte Present: Mayor J. Neil Craig Deputy Mayor Harry Hughes Councillor Dan Buttineau Councillor Paul Marshall Councillor Ralph Hough Councillor John Crawford Councillor Ruth Fountain Staff Present: Andria Leigh, Director of Planning; Janette Teeter, Clerk's Assistant Also Present: John Miller, Bob Barlow, Terry Allison, Mel Coutanche, Craig Drury Mayor J. Neil Craig called the meeting to order and explained the public meeting is to obtain public comments on proposed amendment to the Zoning By-Law. Notice of the Public Meeting was mailed to landowners within 120m of the specified site on February 23, 2005 and posted on a sign on the subject property on February 23, 2005. The following correspondence was received at the meeting: Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority dated March 2, 2005. Andria Leigh, Director of Planning, provided an overview of the proposed amendment to the Zoning By-Law. The following persons offered verbal comments with respect to the proposed amendment to the Zoning By-Law: None. The Mayor advised that written submission will be received at the Township office until March 22, 2005. There being no further comments or questions, the meeting adjourned at 7:19 p.m. A tape of the meeting is available for review at the Township Administration Centre, 148 Line 7 South. ~~- \ TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE REPORT Dept. Report No. To: Prepared By: PD 2005-0017 Committee of the Whole Andy Karaiskakis, Junior Planner Subject: Department: Council Zoning By-law Amendment for Planning C.ofW. William and Stella Duddy Concession 11, West Part of Lot 8, RP 51 R-33214, Part 1 (Medonte) Date: Motion # 22.?nn.. R.M. File No. Date: D14014339 II BACKGROUND: 1- The purpose of this report is to consider the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment application submitted by William and Stella Duddy. The intent of this application was to rezone a parcel of land that was severed by the Committee of Adjustment for residential purposes in July 2004. The application applies to lands legally described as Concession 11, West Part of Lot 8, RP 51 R-33214, Part 1 in the Township of Oro-Medonte (formerly Medonte). The intent of the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment is to rezone the subject lands from the Agricultural/Rural (A/RU) Zone to the Rural Residential Two (RUR2) Zone to reflect the intended residential usage. II ANALYSIS: 1- In July 2004, the Committee of Adjustment granted a consent application for a new lot of approximately 0.52 hectares (1.28 acres) in total land area which was intended to be utilized for residential purposes. As the parcel was currently zoned Agricultural/Rural (A/RU), the Committee of Adjustment included a condition in their decision that required the severed lot to be rezoned to a residential zone to reflect the intended usage. ~ The applicant submitted the application for rezoning and a public meeting as required by the Planning Act was held on March 21, 2005. No concerns were raised at the public meeting and favorable written comments were received from the Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority, the Simcoe County District School Board, and Department Heads. The proposed Zoning By-law Amendment would conform with the intent and policies of the Oro-Medonte Official Plan and the County of Simcoe Official Plan. On this basis, it is recommended that a Zoning By- law Amendment be given favorable consideration by Council. II RECOMMENDATION (S): I' 1. THAT this report be received and adopted; and 2. That a zoning by-law amendment for William and Stella Duddy, that would rezone the lands described as Concession 11, West Part of Lot 8, being RP 51 R-33214, Part 1 (Medonte), on Schedule A21 of Zoning By-law 97-95, as amended from the Agricultural/Rural (A/RU) Zone to the Rural Residential Two (RUR2) Zone be given favorable consideration; and 3. That the Clerk bring forward the appropriate by-law for Council's consideration. Respectfully submitted, A~akis Junior Planner Reviewed by, ~.J~ -t-yt Andria Leigh, MCIP, RPP Director of Planning C.A.O. Comments: Date: 0\~1*1 J ~~ C.A.O. Dept. Head 2 <1k-3 THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF ORO-MEDONTE BY-LAW NO. 2005- Being a By-law to change the zoning on lands within Concession 11, West Part of Lot 8, RP 51R-33214, Part 1 (Medonte) now in the Township of Ora. Medonte (Duddy - Roll # 43-46-020-003-13201-0000). WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte is empowered to pass By-laws to regulate the use of land pursuant to Section 34 of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.P.13. AND WHEREAS Council deems it appropriate to re-zone the lands to permit the development of rural residential uses, in accordance with Section D2 of the Official Plan AND WHEREAS Council deems it appropriate to place the subject land in a zone with yard requirements that are better suited for the subject lot; NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte enacts as follows: 1- Schedule 'A21' to Zoning By-law No, 97-95 as amended, is hereby further amended by changing the zone symbol applying to the lands located in Concession 11, West Part of Lot 8, RP 51R-33214, Part 1, in the former geographic Township of Medonte, now in the Township of Oro-Medonte, from the Agricultural/Rural (AIRU) Zone to the Rural Residential Two (RUR2) Zone as shown on Schedule 'A-1' attached hereto and forming part of this By-law. 2. This By-law shall come into effect upon the date of passage hereof, subject to the provisions of the Planning Act, as amended, READ A FIRST AND SECOND TIME on the 6th day 01 April. 2005. READ A THIRD TIME and finally passed this ~ day of April, 2005. J. Neil Craig, Mayor Marilyn Pennycook, Clerk C\k-LI Schedule 'A-11 to By-Law This is Schedule 'A-1' to By-Law 2005- passed the day of /J Mayor J. Neil Craig ~ N Clerk Marilyn Pennycook 1 " " ",,$' -....0'" ,,\1- ~'<> cP" '<;.1>"," ~ ,fI..\-O c.' ,0 ,:,d' c" 0"' '00 0 '"""'"''''' I .. I , Township of Oro-Medonte I q ~ \ , TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE REPORT Dept. Report No. To: Prepared By: PD 2005-0018 Committee of the Whole Andy Karaiskakis, Junior Planner Subject: Department: Council Zoning By-law Amendment for Planning C.ofW. Joyce McLean Concession 4, West Part of Lot 15 (Oro) Date: Motion # M,.."h?? ?nnr; A.M. File No. Date: D14014406 II BACKGROUND: 1- The purpose of this report is to consider the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment application submitted by Joyce McLean. The intent of this application was to rezone a parcel of land that was severed by the Committee of Adjustment for residential purposes in November 2004. The application applies to lands legally described as Concession 4, West Part of Lot 15 in the Township of Oro-Medonte (formerly Oro). The intent of the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment is to rezone the subject lands from the Agricultural/Rural (A/RU) Zone to the Rural Residential Two (RUR2) Zone to reflect the intended residential usage. II ANALYSIS: ~ In November 2004, the Committee of Adjustment granted a consent application for a new lot of approximately 0.97 hectares (2.4 acres) in total land area which was intended to be utilized for residential purposes. As the parcel was currently zoned Agricultural/Rural (A/RU), the Committee of Adjustment included a condition in their decision that required the severed lot to be rezoned to a residential zone to reflect the intended usage. ,J - J- The applicant submitted the application for rezoning and a public meeting as required by the Planning Act was held on March 21, 2005_ Verbal comments were made by a neighbour and addressed at the time of the public meeting. Favorable written comments were received from the Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority, Simcoe County District School Board, and Department Heads. The proposed Zoning By-law Amendment would conform with the intent and policies of the Oro-Medonte Official Plan and the County of Simcoe Official Plan. On this basis, it is recommended that a Zoning By- law Amendment be given favorable consideration by Council. II RECOMMENDATION (S): I' 1. THAT this report be received and adopted; and 2. That a zoning by-law amendment for Joyce McLean, that would rezone the lands described as Concession 4, West Part of Lot 15 (Oro), on Schedule A12 of Zoning By-law 97-95, as amended from the Agricultural/Rural (A/RU) Zone to the Rural Residential Two (RUR2) Zone be given favorable consideration; and 3. That the Clerk bring forward the appropriate by-law for Council's consideration. Respectfully submitted, Reviewed by, -~J .-eyt Andria Leigh, MCIP, RPP Director of Planning C.A.O. Comments: Date: 11. 11-.< ,1 /l.a./o5: ' vv-A rJ C.A.O. De t. Head 2 ~~-) THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF ORO-MEDONTE BY-LAW NO. 2005- Being a By-law to change the zoning on lands within Concession 4, West Part of Lot 15 (Oro) now in the Township of Oro-Medonte (McLean - Roll # 43-46-010-002-084-0000). WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Township of Ora-Medonte is empowered to pass By-laws to regulate the use of land pursuant to Section 34 of the Planning Act, A.B.O. 1990, c.P.13. AND WHEREAS Council deems it appropriate to fe-zone the lands to permit the development of rural residential uses, in accordance with Section 02 of the Official Plan AND WHEREAS Council deems it appropriate to place the subject !and in a zone with yard requirements that are better suited for the subject lot; NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Corporation of the Township of Ora-Medonle enacts as follows: 1. Schedule 'A12' to Zoning By.!aw No. 97.95 as amended, is hereby further amended by changing the zone symbol applying to the lands located in Concession 11, West Part of Lot 15, in the former geographic Township of Medonte, now in the Township of Ora. Medonte, from the Agricultural/Rural (AlAU) Zone to the Aural Residential Two (AUA2) Zone as shown on Schedule 'A.1' attached hereto and forming part of this By.law. 2. This By.law shall come into effect upon the date of passage hereof, subject to the provisions of the Planning Act, as amended. READ A FIRST AND SECOND TIME on the 6th day of April, 2005. READ A THIRD TIME and finally passed this ~ day of April, 2005. J. Neil Craig, Mayor Marilyn Pennycook, Clerk 1J - Lf Schedule 'A-11 to By-Law This is Schedule 'A-1' to By-Law 2005- passed the day of ! Mayor J. Neil Craig 'OS N Clerk Marilyn Pennycook 1 '?,\Q'i> ~,,,, ,<0 "'" 0 looM","rs ,,",' , Township of Oro-Medonte n M%i~ "-\~-\ "~'.--'---"--'_,'!!.~~~ l~i\ 1- .,.. -J ~~'5"Y ~ TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE REPORT Dept. Report No. To: Prepared By: PD 2005-0019 Committee of the Whole Andy Karaiskakis, Junior Planner Subject: Department: Council Zoning By-law Amendment for Planning C.ofW. Glenn Bidwell Concession 5, Part of Lot 9, RP 51 R-33403, Part 1 (Oro) Date: Motion # ~?? R.M. File No. Date: D14 014407 II BACKGROUND: I~ The purpose of this report is to consider the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment application submitted by Glenn Bidwell. The intent of this application was to rezone a parcel of land that was severed by the Committee of Adjustment for residential purposes in November 2004. The application applies to lands legally described as Concession 5, Part of Lot 9, RP 51R-33403, Part 1 in the Township of Oro-Medonte (formerly Oro). The intent of the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment is to rezone the subject lands from the Agricultural/Rural (A/RU) Zone to the Rural Residential Two (RUR2) Zone to reflect the intended residential usage_ II ANALYSIS: , In November 2004, the Committee of Adjustment granted a consent application for a new lot of approximately 0.55 hectares (1.37 acres) in total land area which was intended to be utilized for residential purposes. As the parcel was currently zoned Agricultural/Rural (A/RU), the Committee of Adjustment included a condition in their decision that required the severed lot to be rezoned to a residential zone to reflect the intended usage. ~t'n-d- The applicant submitted the application for rezoning and a public meeting as required by the Planning Act was held on March 21, 2005. No concerns were raised at the public meeting and favorable written comments were received from the Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority, the Simcoe County District School Board, and Department Heads. The proposed Zoning By-law Amendment would conform with the intent and policies of the Oro-Medonte Official Plan and the County of Simcoe Official Plan. On this basis, it is recommended that a Zoning By- law Amendment be given favorable consideration by Council. II RECOMMENDATION (S): , 1. THAT this report be received and adopted; and 2. That a zoning by-law amendment for Glenn Bidwell, that would rezone the lands described as Concession 5, Part of Lot 9, being RP 51 R-33403, Part 1 (Oro), on Schedule A12 of Zoning By- law 97-95, as amended from the Agricultural/Rural (A/RU) Zone to the Rural Residential Two (RUR2) Zone be given favorable consideration; and 3. That the Clerk bring forward the appropriate by-law for Council's consideration. Respectfully submitted, A~S Junior Planner Reviewed by, ---1J;'~ Andria Leigh, MCIP, RPP Director of Planning C.A.O. Comments: Date: r'L~'--' ',)..... .s, ~ C.A.O. V De t. Head 2 1",-) THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF ORO-MEDONTE BY-LAW NO. 2005- Being a By.law to change the zoning on lands within Concession 5, Part of lot 9, RP 51R.33403, Part 1 (Ora) now in the Township of Oro~Medonte (Bidwell- Roll # 43-46-010-002-287-0000). WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte is empowered to pass By-laws to regulate the use of land pursuant to Section 34 of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.P.13. AND WHEREAS Council deems it appropriate to re-zone the lands to permit the development of rural residential uses, in accordance with Section 02 of the Official Plan AND WHEREAS Council deems it appropriate to place the subject land in a zone with yard requirements that are better suited for the subject lot; NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte enacts as follows: 1. Schedule 'A12' to Zoning By-law No. 97-95 as amended, is hereby further amended by changing the zone symbol applying to the lands located in Concession 11, West Part of Lot 15, in the former geographic Township of Medonte, now in the Township of Oro- Medonte, from the Agricultural/Rural (AlRU) Zone to the Rural Residential Two (RUR2) Zone as shown on Schedule 'A-1' attached hereto and forming part of this By-law. 2. This By-law shall come into effect upon the date of passage hereof, subject to the provisions of the Planning Act, as amended. READ A FIRST AND SECOND TIME on the 6th day of April, 2005. READ A THIRD TIME and finally passed this _ day of April, 2005. J. Neil Craig, Mayor Marilyn Pennycook, Clerk . ~ "",-Y- Schedule 'A-11 to By-Law This is Schedule 'A-1' to By-Law 2005- passed the day of U Mayor J. Neil Craig ~ N Clerk Marilyn Pennycook ,,' (:p~f?J ,.0 '00 100 MatefS TOwnship of Oro-Medonte ~~~~~ ",~/' ~~',-,(c " , '\J'~ r ~ ~ 1\-\ It BJ %, I- :, _ ._..'''~ \~/ , t"J ~ -"<::~-:' ,~ TOWNSHIP OF ORO-MEDONTE REPORT Dept. Report No. To: Prepared By: PD2005-024 Committee of the Whole Andria Leigh, RPP Subject: Department: Council Planning 2976 Highway 11 - C.ofW. Concession 7, Lot 20, Date: Plan 1145, Lots 6-8 (Oro) March 22, 2005 Motion Zoning R.M. File #: # Date: RolI#: 010-003-31500-0000 II BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: I As requested by the CAO. this report is being presented to Council regarding the zoning of the above noted property related to permitted uses and prohibited uses identified in the Township's Zoning By-law 97-95, as amended. The property is located within the Oro Centre Secondary Plan Area and was designated primarily Highway 11 Special Policy Area and Oro Centre - Office/Industrial by OPA # 15. The property is zoned General Commercial Exception 32(GC*32) in the Township's Zoning By-law 97-95, as amended. The exception zone does not permit the development of new buildings or the construction of additions to buildings that existed on the effective date of the By-law (November 5,1997). Table A2 - identifies the permitted uses in the General Commercial (GC) zone and is attached for the Committee's reference. One of the permitted uses on Table A2 is a marine sales and service establishment which can include outdoor storage, display and sales areas. On December 17, 2004 a site visit was conducted and confirmed that the existing building was being utilized for a marine sales and service business. As this is a permitted use under the zoning by-law the outdoor storage related to that business would be permitted under the by-law. Site Plan Control, although applicable to commercial properties, is only effective when a building permit is being requested and one is not required at this time. On March 22, 2005 a subsequent site visit was conducted more specifically related to Section 5.25 - Prohibited Uses of Zoning By-law 97-95. A copy of this section which outlines the uses that are prohibited in any zone within the Township is also attached for the Committee's reference. This site visit confirmed that the outdoor storage of partially dismantled motor ve'hicles and trailers is occurring and the owner has been requested to remove ~e:e within 30 days in accordance with Township policies. Once removed, the property would comply with the provisions of the Township's Zoning By-law. II RECOMMENDATIONS: II It is recommended to Council: 1. THAT Report No. PD 2005-24 be received for information purposes. Respectfully Submitted, --1J ~~ Andria Leigh, MC ,RPP Director of Planning C.A.O. Comments: Date: C.A.O. Dept. Head - 2 - - \ \ , \ '< U \ ;:;: W ~ U~ , ",8 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -' << ;:;: w z w '" - if) \ '" I Z \ 0 N -'if) <~ -if) U;;> ;:;: -' ;.;::~ _w << I ". u \ ~!"" O!: ;:;: U~ '" \~ ~ U~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1. '::t... -'0 . . . . ~ U '" -' << << U ,... 3 '" w \j "5 ~ ~ '" \ '5 ~ \j ~ E' w w w if ~ " ~ z ~ '" :(j c " 0 if) " :g -.g -;; ;;;J ~ ~ :(j .~ ~ " ~ N " B ~ u ~ to ~ ~ u 1) ~ :g ~ .~ g g g " ~ ~ .g ~ g- ~ -" ! i5 :(j .~ ~ ~ c '" '~ ~ {ii 0 -" :?:' ~ " .'" -;; :(j ~ ~, j'j E "5 .., "5 ~ "0 11 " u E: ~ '6 ~ " ~ ~ ~ ~ ." ~ '.S u .;: "" ~ ~ " '" u ~ ~ 'S' -0 :> '" ,;; :(j ~ ;;, "" " " "" ~ ~ g :(j ~s c; 15 -;; w g- c; -;; ~ -;; -;; -;; u <5 -Ii " .E' ~ '" ~ -% g- '" ,;; 11 E .~ -" " '~ .~ '0 Ii .~ -;; c; ~ .~ .9- g ~ " % 1:' ~ ~ ~ ~ p. <i -" S c; " -" ~ ~ -" ~ .., "" j'j , '5 .E ~ -;; ? > <i ~ .~ ", ~ " " " E '0 -e " ~ "" Jk " 11 " -;; :> ~ ~ E' " c; ~ " u ~ B ~ " g ~ :> E ~ "" <T .S " ? S ~ g " ;; ." '6 ;; S :.;; " ! '" 1S 'a '~ 'Ii " w " ~ ?i " -0 ~ ? > ~ 11. .~ to " ~ :> <5 " " 8 g " ~ -0 " " " " :> ;a ." g. ~ ;). ~ " <- to '" U U U U '" ;.;: ;:!: :;: :;: :;: ::;: :;: :;: ~ ;.- I'- I'- 0.- ... ... if) ,... \ <- to U '" '" u. 0 :t - ~ '" .-J :;: 7- 0\'" Cf '" if) f-- :0 >- 3< x 'r N <- '" U (:> G3 u. o \ r- <- to U (:> u. o \ \ ~ i\- 5.22 PARKING OF SCHOOL BUSES A maximum of two school buses are pem1itted to be stored on a lot that is the site of a dwelling unit, provided the school bus is normaJJy driven by an occupant of the dwelling unit. 5.23 PARKING OF UNLICENSED MOTOR VEHICLES IN THE RI, R2, RURI, RUR2, SR AND RLS ZONES A maximum of one unlicensed mOlOr vehicle is permitted to be parked on a lot in the Residential One (Rl), Residential Two (R2), Rural Residential One (RURl), Rural Residential Two (RUR2), Shoreline Residential (SR) and Residential Limited Service (RLS) Zones. 5.24 PARKING OF UNLICENSED MOTOR VEHICLES IN THE AIRU ZONE A maximum of two unlicensed motor vehicles are permitted to be parked on_a lot in the Agricultural!Rural (AlRU) Zone. For the purposes of this By-law, farm vehicles are exempt from this provision. 5.25 PROHIBITED USES The foJJowing uses are prohibited in any Zone: a) The use of any Irailer for human habitation, except where such Irailer is located in a camping establishment, in a trailer park or in a mobile home park. b) The use of any motor vehicle for human habitation, c) The use of any accessOlY building or strncture or boalhouse for human habitation. d) The use of a truck, bus or coach body for human habitation. e) The storage of disused rail cars, streetcars, truck bodies or trailers without wheels. f) The parking or storage of trailers or commercial motor vehicles on a vacant lot. g) The outdoor storage of partia]]y dismantled molOr vehicles or Irailers or motor vehicle or trailer parts. h) Obnoxious uses. i) The manufacturing, refming, rendering or distilJation of add, ammonia, chlorine, coal, creosote, explosives, fIreworks, glue, petroleum or tar. j) The bulk storage of industrial chemicals, hazardous waste or liquid industrial waste as defIned under the Environmental Protection Act, as amended. 41