Loading...
06 12 1989 Public Minutes THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO SPECIAL PUBLIC MEETING MONDAY, JUNE 12, 1989 @ 7:00 P.M. - COUNCIL CHAMBERS THIRTY-THIRD MEETING 1988-1991 COUNCIL The following members of Council were present: Reeve Robert E. Drury Deputy Reeve David Caldwell Councillor David Burton Councillor Alastair Crawford Council1or Allan Johnson (arrived at the meeting at 7:25 pm) Also present were: Ms. Beverly Nicolson, Township Planner, Mr. Ron Watkin, Township Planning Consultant, Mr. Richard Vanderzande, Junior Planner, Ainley & Associates, Gary Bell, Denton, Brumwell, Trudy Paterson, John Stitler, Fay MacPherson, Don MacPherson, Frank Reid, Nancy VanVeld, Aart VanVeld, D. Emms, William Coward, Carol Coward, Keith Lees, Helen Coutts, Dougas Hickling, Barry Barber, Marilyn Swerdon, Shirley Woodrow, Bob Swerdon, Jim Drury, Brian Mason, Paul Edgerton, Len Edgerton, R. Gee, Phil Saula, Paul Weidman, Fred and Gladys Arff, Chuck Lowe, Eila Weir, Trudy Walt, Nick Nikolopolous, and Stephen Woodrow Reeve Robert E. Drury chaired the meeting. Reeve Robert E. Drury opened the meeting by explaining to those present that the purpose of the public meeting was to introduce a proposed Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment under Sections 17(2) and 34(12) of the Planning Act The proposed Official PIan and zoning By-law Amendment is to redesignate those lands located in Part of Lots 19 and 20, Concession 1 from Agricultural designation to Country Residential and Recreation Uses; and further to rezone f the Agricultural (A), and Open Space Recreation (OSl) to Country Residential (CR), Rural Residential (RUR) and Open Space Recreation (OS1) zone. Notice of the public meeting was circulated to all property owners within 400 feet of the subject lands. Notice of the public meeting was also placed in both the Barrie Examiner and Orillia Packet and Times on May 17, 1989. The Reeve then asked the Clerk if there had been any correspondence received on this matter. The Clerk responded by indicating that no correspondence had been received. The Reeve then stated that those persons present would be afforded the opportunity of asking questions with respect to the proposed Official Plan Amendment. Reeve Robert Drury then turned the meeting over to the Township Planner Ms. Beverly Nicolson to explain the purpose and effect of the proposed amendments. At the conclusion of Ms. Nicolson's presentation, the Planning Consultant for the Developer, Mr. Gary Bell of Skelton, Brumwell and Associates, addressed those present stating the status of the development. Mr. Bell presented the proposed plan for expansion to the golf course to 18 holes and also the proposal for a country residential plan of subdivision. At the completion of this overview, those present were then asked if they had any questions or concerns with respect to the matter. Jim Drury: What classification of agricultural lands applies to this area to be developed? - 2 - Gary Bell: The Country Residential portion of the property is Class 7 Jim Drury: I worked that property a few years back and it isn't that bad of land. Was there a previous plan proposed with regards to a similar development of this nature within the last year or year and a half. Bev Nicolson: Not within the last year. Ron Watkin: There may have been other proposalsmade for this property but no other plan has proceeded to a public meeting. Jim Drury: I am concerned about Agricultural land and trying to preserve it and with this development I am concerned with the surrounding lands and those across the road in Vespra Township. (Mr. Drury then quoted a section from the Food Land Guidelines). Is residential land not in conflict with agricultural operations? Does Council wish to guarantee neighbouring farmers that there will be no complaints from this residential development about smell, noise, etc. which is ivolved with the operation of a farm? The farm across the road is a pig operation and the smell from there is quite apparent. Ron Watkin: The Developer must satisfy the Ministry of Agricultural and Food and the Ministry of Environment standards and policies. Jim Drury: Would Council allow an agricultural development into a residential area, such as a pig farm? If not, why would you allow a residential development into an agricultural area? Chuck Low: I have a map showing the Dalston wetlands and would like to know where this would be in reference to Simoro? Gary Bell: I am not sure what the boundaries are for the Dalston Wetlands but it is well known that there are wetlands here. The Township Official Plan and Zoning By-law recognizes a large area there as Open Space for conservation. It is quite possible that the Ministry will find that the golf course is a compatible use for this area. II Bill Swallow: This proposal is very close to my house. Is that going to have any affect on my well, as I have only a 14 foot well? Gary Bell: According to the map here, you will be a full Township lot away from the development. Doug Brumwell: We have looked at the aspects of nitrate migration which is the possibility of sewage contamination of well water supply. A hydrogeologist will be required at the draft plan approval stage, however our preliminary calculations indicate that nitrate levels will be well below the standards. Bill Swallow: Is Simoro going to buy the lot beside my house to put in a future subdivision? Doug Brumwell: Bill Swallow: Doug Brumwell: Reeve Drury: Bill Swallow: Reeve Drury: Paul Edgerton: Gary Bell: Paul Edgerton: I Ron Watkin: Lillian McConnell: Ron Watkin: Lillian McConnell: Barry Barber: - j - I can't really answer anything beyond the development you're looking at tonight. What effect is this going to have on fire protection. The Fire Department right now has Horseshoe Valley, Oro Hills and Sugarbush and have a fair size area to cover between County Road 22 and the 15/16 Sideroad and Hwy #93 and Line 7. With regards to location of the property, Edgar would be the department to service this location. Some of the other more built up areasare further away from the fire hall than this particular development. We-have over 64 volunteers between our 4 different departments, Shanty Bay, Hawkestone, Rugby and Edgar and we feel quite comfortable that we have sufficient coverage with the volunteers. We also have 4 pumpers, 4 tankers and an emergency vehicle so Council feels that we are well covered for fire protection. What type of services will these development be seeking. They will be receiving the same type of service as everyone else in the Township. As of July 1st we will be implementing complete Township-wide garbage pick-up and recycling and the snow removal equipment will be coming down from the 20/21 Sideroad to plow the subdivision. According to the Township Zoning By-law the permitted uses of land zoned Agricultural include conservation areas, golf courses, etc. If golf courses are allowed under an Agricultural zoning, why are you asking for a redesignation of land_to expand the golf course? The Developer wants to have this proposal handled with full public knowledge and review and the best way to do that is under the planning changes proposed. What will the benefit of this development be on the ratepayers of Oro? The Council at this stage is here to listen to what your concerns are but not at this point to answer questions relative to it. It's a system that exists with an obligation to go to the public and the developer and not to prejudice their decision by making statements in that respect. What is Mr. Watkin's position with the Township? I am the Chief Planner with the firm of Ainley & Associates and I am also working in conjunction with the Township of Oro. I was under the impression that a public meeting was an information gathering and communication is a two-way street. I think Councilor their representatives should be responding to the concerns of the ratepayers here. I live on Lot 22, Concession 1, when was the last time the proposed subdivision land was used for agricultural use? - 4 - Ron Watkin: It hasn't been used last 20 years. probably for the Barry Barber: I can't see this being detrimental to the area or any problems with it. I would rather see cars travelling by then 10 gravel trucks. I support this proposal. Len Edgerton: I live on Lot 13, Concession 1. I good friend of my applied back a few years ago, to the Department of Highways for a driveway permit from Highway 93. He was turned down because it was classified as as Access Highway. It took him about three years of red tape to get his entrance put in. When did this policy change? Gary Bell: The Ministry of Transportation and the Municipalities of Oro and Vespra may want to limit the number of individual driveways that either front out or back out onto Hwy 93. What we are proposing is a a proper municipal road entrance at one point only for the homes which would be built internally. The one point there has been considered a safe and proper location for a municipal road by ourselves and the Ministry of Transportation. Reeve Drury: Perhaps Mr. Bell you could find the criteria the Ministry uses and perhaps mail it to Mr. Edgerton. , John Hare: This is just for some information, the Developers of a golf course at Concession 11 and County Road 22 had applied back in the early 1970's to the Township for the same thing that these gentlemen are going for now. They turned him down because it did not fit into the Official Plan. Gladys Arff: Why are we having spot developments rather than expanding the existing hamlets which most likely would not be encroaching onto agricultural land. There would most likely be community halls, churches, parks, ball diamonds, etc. already in existence. I think all we are doing is satisfying someone's desires to make a quick dollar at the expense of all the ratepayers, whether that be measured in dollars or the quality of life. Frank Reid: I am the original owner of Simoro Golf Links. There has never been any farming done where this proposal is situated. With all due respect to Jim (Drury), he may have cropped a little hay there one time. I am in favour of it and I think it's a good thing for the Township itself. Don McPherson: I'm on the south half of Lot 19 and I have no objections to them putting in this subdivison next to me. It will definitely improve the area and the land values around it. Hwy 93 is built up now with houses all around so I cannot see what they are objecting to. " . - 5 - Bill Coward: I am right in the centre of this subdivision and I have no objection to it. Bill Swallow: My concern is where the road accesses onto Highway 93 because there is a big hill there. Frank Reid: I'd like to answer that Mr. Reeve. When I first started up the golf course, I was told there had never been an accident on that Highway from Dalston down, in over 50 years. Reeve Drury: I had an accident on Highway 93 one time, I backed out in front of somebody. Bill Swallow: With 9 more houses going in and each house having more or less 2 cars, that makes an extra 18 vehicles going in and out of that Highway. Paul Edgerton: I also have some concerns with the road safety. For a few years now I've been driving a bus along Hwy 93 and if you have a bus load of kids and are stopped at that entrance with a dump truck or cement truck coming down the hill from the north, it's going to have a hard time to stop. Mrs. VanVeld: I was told by Sinton bus lines that I was responsible for getting my child to the assigned spot to be picked up because of the blind area. Jim Drury: I I I'm also concerned with the increase it will have on schools and also the roads. What would the additional cost of the plow having to come down onto Highway 93 to service another subdivision. Reeve Drury: with respect to the schools, the School Board will make comments on any subdivision proposals that come forward, as it is not within our jurisdiction. There was a report prepared on the cost of roads maintenance, but unfortunately our Road Superintendent is not here this evening to comment on that. We will be looking at that aspect later on. Doug Hickling: I am the Deputy-Reeve from the Township of Vespra and I was asked to attend here this evening to express some of our concerns. Our Township has several agricultural operations in very close proximity, even though the property right across the road is not presently being intensively farmed, the potential is there. I would like to ask Mr. Bell that he eluded the Agricultural code of practices in that if that farm directly across the road was intensively used, would that not wipe out this subdivision as far as a hearing for agricultural code of practices? I I I I,', " - 6 - Gary Bell: We had a preliminary look at the Agricultural Code of Practice and the Ministry of Agriculture and Food is doing specific calculations. To the best of our knowledge there are no animals on either farms opposite this and the likelihood that these farms becoming a major farm operation is very small. If that were to happen, a minimum distance of separation is somewhere between 80 and 90 metres. Our measurements indicate there is an excess of 150 metres from either of the barns. Doug Hickling: You must consider that this is down-wind from the farms. Have you had any direct input yet from Mr. Vanwesinbeck? (Ministry of Agriculture) Gary Bell: Mr. Vanwesinbeck is very concerned about the protection of agricultural land. He will be looking very closely at any Official Plan Amendment considered by Oro Council which comes to the Ministry. His initial response is one of concern but once he has received all the information and facts and all the considerations of the Municipality, I feel he will find that it does conform with the Foodland Guidelines. Doug Hickling: Is this cul-de-sac coming to the edge of the redesignated property? Gary Bell: Yes. Doug Hickling: Isa one-foot reserve being considered there to guarantee there won't be any future development there? Ron Watkin: That has been discussed, but no details have been made at this time. Doug Hickling: Has the need for this subdivision been addressed? Gary Bell: There's a builder of private homes in Barrie who is specifically interested in this property as well as several real estates agencies who have a demand for rural residential, country residential and estate residential lots. Oro Township has areas in the north which have been designated for development, such as Horseshoe Valley area. There is a wide range of housing capability in Oro and I think it is in the Township's interests to meet the residential needs and demands required. Doug Hickling: I would appreciate it if you would keep our concerns in mind. I also don't think you're providing adequate fire protection at this corner of the municipality and I think you should be addressing that as well. Reeve Drury: We have acquired lands in the Horseshoe Valley area to build a future fire hall there to meet the demands required. - 7 - Bill Swallow: Who's going to pay for the cost of outfitting that future fire hall? Reeve Drury: This matter has nothing to do with the proposal here tonight and it would be appreciated if you would keep your concerns specifically to this. Fred Arff: What is the rating on the Dalston Wetlands? Gary Bell: It's a class 2 wetland. The proposed residential area is well removed from the wetlands. Fred Arff: How many more homes might be planned after this amendment? Gary Bell: This Official Plan amendment and the Zoning By-law amendment we are requesting, involves specifically what you see here tonight. The Reeve in closing the meeting, thanked those in attendance for their participation and advised that Council would consider all matters before reaching a decision. He also advised those present that if they wished to be notified of the passing of the proposed by-law, they should leave their name and address with the Clerk. Motion No.1 Moved by Burton, seconded by Crawford Be it resolved that the Special Public Meeting be adjourned at 8:15 p.m. Carried. Reev~/: ~