Loading...
07 17 1989 Public Min 7:00 THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ORO " ~ , SPECIAL PUBLIC MEETING MONDAY, JULY 17,1989 @ 7:00 P.M. - COUNCIL CHAMBERS FORTY-FIRST MEETING 1988-1991 COUNCIL The following members of Council were present: Reeve Robert E. Drury Deputy Reeve David Caldwell Councillor David Burton Councillor Alastair Crawford Councillor Allan Johnson I I Also present were: Beverly Nicolson, Gary Bell, Scott Brumwell, Scott Elliott, Anne Terry, Jacquie Besse, Bob Besse, William Fitzgerald, Kathy Dauphin, B. Gauldie, L. Murray, Nel Newell, Angela McConnell, Lillian McConnell, Frank Janson, Elsie Hare, John Hare, Anita Beaton, W. Reid, Gordon Handy, Edward and Janet Fleming, Alex McGuire, June McGuire, Gladys Gronfors, Leon Musicco, Nancy Musicco, Bill Bazzard, Shirley Norman, Leita Handy, Joan Reid, E.R. Alexander, Barry Norman, Jim Shellswell, Pat Shellswell, Diane Buffett, and one member of the press. Reeve Robert E. Drury chaired the meeting. Reeve Robert E. Drury opened the meeting by explaining to those present that the purpose of the Special Public Meeting was to introduce a proposed Zoning By-law Amendment under Section 34(12) of the Planning Act. The proposed Zoning By-law Amendment would rezone those lands located in part of the West Half of Lot 8, Concession 8 from Agricultural (A) Zone to the Industrial Extractive (M2) Zone. Notice of the public meeting was circulated to all property owners within 400 feet of the subject lands. Notice of the public meeting was also placed in the Barrie Examiner and the Orillia Packet and Times on June 14, 1989. The Reeve then asked the Clerk if there had been any correspondence received on this matter. The Clerk responded by indicating that correspondence had been received from Mr. & Mrs. Gordon Handy, Mr. Harold L. Atwood, and Mr. Peter Walsh. (This correspondence was read to those present by the Clerk). The Reeve then stated that Council wants to hear from all sides of those who are in favour of the proposal and those I that are opposed to it. Council does not propose to take a position at this meeting and are here this evening to listen to the concerns of those present. Council at a later meeting will consider the merits of their representations and make a decision in what is believed to be in the public interest. Reeve Robert E. Drury then turned the meeting over to the Township Planner Ms. Beverly Nicolson who explained the purpose and effect of the proposed amendment. - 2 - At the conclusion of Ms. Nicolsonls presentation, those present were then asked if they had any questions or concerns with respect to the matter. Barry Normën: When did this land become the rural aggregate designation? Bev Nicolson: Official Plan Amendment No. 15 ~as approved by the Ministry in 1983; subsequent to that there was a zoning by-law which initiated rural, rural aggregate and rural residential zones. Lillian McConnell: Could you explain the meaning of rehabilitation after the gravel has been extracted? Bev Nicolson: Currently the rehabilitation plan is to revert it back to Agriculture. Before they commence extraction they remove the topsoil and store it. When they rehabilitate they replace topsoil and it reverts back to Agriculture. Lillian McConnell: Does it have to rezone back to Agriculture or could it be possible that it be rezoned Residential. Bev Nicolson: The current planning is to return it back to Agricultural. Anything else would require an Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment. Lynn Murray: I live on the 7th Concession, Lot 6. My first question is for Mr. Small. When I came in this evening I presented you with some letters which were not read this evening and is there a chance that these letters could be included into the minutes to be aware of our opposition. Bob Small: It is the policy of the Municipality that they must be received during office hours and certainly these letters ~ill be circulated at their next meeting prior to any decision being made on this particular proposal. Lynn Murray: It is unfortunate because when I spoke to you personally about one particular letter which was not signed you did not inform me of that policy. Lynn Murray: Mr. Drury, have you ever been awakened by the roar of gravel trucks going by your house at 5:03 a.m.? Reeve Drury: I live on Hwy 93 and there are probably more gravel trucks travel that road than most in Simcoe County. To ask if I have been awaken at 5:03 a.m., I don't know about that. - 3 - Lynn Murray: The occurances of early morning wake-ups have been far too numerous to mention. It is absolutely astounding what other people in this Township are missing by not living where there are three existing gravel pits, and a fourth already licenced to operate and now the Township is considering giving permission for a fifth? (Asked Council if they had any children). How would you as parents like to live with the constant worry that we live with daily. Many parents who chose to live in rural areas chose so for themselves and for their children. There are children on the 7th line who have been forced to retire their bicycles. Just this past weekend a child was run off the road, his bike was smashed and he has some stitches in his head. The 7th Line from Coulson to Highway 11 is a well travelled Simcoe County Board of Education bus route. This morning I spoke to the directly involved people who have continuous reported that these trucks do not obey stop signs, speed signs, and they don't even stop for the flashing lights on the buses. Who gives them permission to disregard the laws that you and I have to follow. The Board of Education has been notified as well as the O.P.P., every time these occurances happen. Everyone here tonight who lives on the 7th Line or the Old Barrie Road or travels those routes, has experienced at least one near miss with a grave truck. My second concern is rezoning of this farm. When I came to the office to review Sarjeantls proposal, two-thirds of that farmland is Class 3 Agricultural. It has been a good workable farm and it is a crime to destroy such valuable farm land like this, especially when we have four already in the same area. [I The third concern I have is the topic of development. Last week at the public meeting there was a map clearly showing 100 acres on the corner of the 7th Line and the Bass Lake Sideroad which also has plans for a subdivision. I question the Township's philosophy and their planning for the future. This property is a mere 1/2 mile away from the nearest gravel pit. Before you now you see concerned and angry people, perhaps not as many as last week, but just as concerned and angry. We are seriously questioning your abilities and foresight when for two weeks in a row we have to fight so hard to ensure that Council consider all the factors before reaching some of these crucial decisions. We know your job is not easy, but must we live in your back pockets to make sure that you are keeping us in mind? You have to consider rural, recreational, agricultural and business interests along with the Provincial Governments concerns, we know that is not an easy task. I propose you limit the travel of gravel trucks to limit the number of functioning pits to 3 at anyone time; you find a better method of policing their Lynn Murray (Cont'd): Bob Gauldie: Pat Shellswell: - 4 - neglect in following the basic rules of the road and develop structured hours of operation. Doesn't 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. sound realistic to you? I also propose that we maintain all good farmland as possible, we aren't producing anymore. Lastly, I propose that Council revise their overall plan that would better reflect the wisdom, judgement and caring for all concerned. The taxpayers are carrying the load for these gravel pits. Council should do a survey to see how much we spend to maintain the roads. The dust on these roads is horrendous. What guarantee do we have from the pits that they will maintain the wells in the surrounding area. Why not make full utilization of the pits being used now and once they are finished, then open up new ones? Gravel is a necessity, no one is arguing that but we are upset with the way in which it is being done. As a land owner, who would not want to buy on a road which is dusty, that you cannot let your kids play near, and there is noise all around. We are looking for a compromise to ensure they are utilized in the proper manner. I would like to make a couple of proposals: (1) gravel pits be charged with road maintenance; guarantees to everyone in the area that their water will not be affected: (3) restrict new pits; (4) Councilor the gravel pits be asked to reimburse those land owners who lose on the land value by depreciation. ( 2 ) Village of Edgar. Approximately 1 year ago we attended a meeting here and protested the gravel trucks going through Edgar Village. During the past year, I haven't seen much chan Things are basically the same way other than a reduced speed limit and the occasional policeman out trying to control the speed. I am also concerned about the time of day in which these gravel trucks are coming through. The homes in the Village of Edgar are older homes and built closely to the County Road and when you are awakened at 5:00 o'clock in the morning day after day, it becomes a little irritating. I am also concerned about the safety of children and there are a number of children who stand and wait for the bus at the Edgar store, maybe as many as 20 children. If all these gravel trucks are coming down the 7th, there are just as many going across the Old Barrie Road. It's nothing to look out now and seeing 5 or 6 going through the Village at one time. They have put some type of a hardtop onto the Old Barrie Road and I am sure the gravel pits are not paying for the upkeep of these roads. They also now have shoulders and this has made it even more dangerous because the trucks go off on 0 these shoulders. I have personally had a truck coming at me head on. - 5 - John Hare: Do you have any idea how much weight are in these trucks? I found a bi 1 the other day on the side of the road and the gross weight of the truck including snow boot, was 60,200 lbs. His load was 40,200 Ibs. Our roads are not built to accommodate these 30 ton trucks. Reeve Drury: There are no weight regulations that the Province puts out and therefore they can haul whatever amount they want on the roads during the full load season. Oro Council will be having a meeting within the next month or so with all the pit owners on the 7th Concession and will be looking at several options to improve our gravel haul routes with the pit owners. This is a voluntary basis, they recognize the need for better roads also and they want to contribute to some of our roads to improve. Barry Norman: One of my biggest concerns is what Mr. Hare has already mentioned - the roads. I find it hard to believe that Council would even consider a rezoning application to allow trucks hauling trailers on the roads that they cannot safely permit. We've had them go by on Sundays and by the time the O.P.P. arrive the driver is long gone. The trucks all have C.B.'s so they don't get caught speeding. I understand that there are 8 or 9 more applications in for gravel pits, is that correct? eeve Drury: I understand through the Ministry of Natural Resources liason person that there are 9 in total applications coming into Oro Township but we have no idea of when or where. arry Norman: To me that is unbelievable to think this could happen, there will be maybe twelve or thirteen pits between the sixth and seventh. I feel in the interest of preservation of the Natural Resource and the people that live there that you should operate the existing pits, exhaust those pits, control them to some degree and when the gravel is necessary then licence the pits. How would you people like the pits down by your home? Secondly, if you have ever lived near a pit there is something called air polution and one of the pollutants is large clouds of dust. The other problem is the smell from diesel equipment. Also what about wild life, what about environment, erosion caused by the cutting down of trees. And back to the water situation, in my opinion there should be a written guarantee up front, that we are not going to have a water problem and if we do it will be rectified. Another concern is the property devaluation, we have spent alot of money putting alot of quality into our home and felt we wanted to live there all our lives. Barry Norman: Bob Swerdon: rly Nicolson: Swerdon: rt Small: Swerdon: rt Small: Swerdon: rt Small: Swerdon: - 6 - A guarantee in writing should be made by the gravel pi ts gua¡:anteeing that our values will not drop. There is not a big delegation here tonight but there is alot of concerned people and I hope the Council will look at people and put them ahead of dollars. I would like to direct the question to Bev. Approximately how many thousands of acres in Oro do we have designated for aggregate development in the Official Plan? I apologize, I realize off the top of your head you could not answer the question but I think you would agree that it does measure in the thousands of acres. Is that reasonable? About eight, one thousand acres. I think it is considerably more than that. If everyone of the properties that has aggregate designation in the Official Plan today carne forward with an application to rezone to industrial for extraction, the Township today does not have a plan for the orderly development of this aggregate. As we put a big hole in the middle of this Township and extract the heart of Oro, the residents of this Community are going to be paying with the disadvantage of living in this Township. If there was compensation to the residents for that during this period of turmoil, but I can not see how this can happen. I would suggest that the Township take a look at the proposals that are going to be comming in, there is not going to be just nine there is going to be nine hundred over the next couple of years. The legislation has not been passed yet. Yes it has. What is the final figure? It is four cents a tonne. Effective immediately? In September. So any application prior to that seems to be redundant. In 1973 there was severance applications by farmers that were held back, in some cases six months, until the Official Plan went through so that it would allow only one severance to come through. I do not think this Township should be looking at this situation in any different way and there should not be any applications granted until that actually comes into effect. The second factor is that the 7th line 0 Oro has been designated as a haul route through the Official Plan. It is not ready yet to be a haul route. I do not see how we can have any vehicles or increase in the traffic going through at this Bob Swerdon: cont'd Lynn Murray: Scott Elliott: Dr. Beaton: Ed Flemming: Reeve Drury: - 7 - point, until it is a haul route, capable of handling it. In the next couple of years there will be work done on it, when that work is done it will inconvenienc a couple of hundred trucks a day. If all of a sudden we increase the tonnage by opening up the number of pits that look like they are going to be opening up and increasing the tonnage, wdre increasing the number of trucks that are going to have to go through that route while that road is being reconstructed. I hope that the good planning we have seen in subdivision proposals in this Township does not repeat itsself in the good planning you are going to be proposing in the gravel industry. I have a concern I would like to direct at Scott Elliott, in Bev Nicolsonls report that the farm would be restored to agricultural, I would like to ask Scott how you would restore property to agricultural after you have dug down one hundred feet. You are not going one hundred feet deep just like that, the property is one hundred acres and it would be sloped down gradually on each side. There would not be a problem as far as growing things on. I have here a letter which just registers objection to this current request for a rezoning and request a hold be put on any decisions of changes and developments at this time because we have had so many changes and developments within a very short period of time. It is extremely difficult for anyone at this time to predict just what an impact it is going to have in terms of environment, economic and social effect it is going to have. I have one specific question in connection with the future planning I hope you are going to do before you launch into any further development and that is how many gravel trucks would you like to see travelling around the roads of Oro Townhip? Which areas of Oro Township do you see these trucks travelling because I donlt think the seventh line by its location alone is going to take all the trucks. Do we contract out the Calcium supply because we cannot do it with our own equipment? That is correct. - 8 - Ed Flemming: Our own equipment did a super job first time this year. The equipment contracted out is next to a waste of time because they go down the middle of the road so that almost as much dust is created. I would suggest spending the lit Ie bit extra to them to go down one side and back the other or use our own equipment as well as we can. Bev Nicolson: I would just like to say that I think the concerns that have been expressed here tonight are all quite valid and I am sure that Council recognizes them as well because they do live in the Township and they do see all the things you have talked about tonight. We have to recognize that we do have a very necessary and valid resource right in the middle of our Town- ship and the Provincial policy is quite strong in the protection of this. Under the regulations of the Pits and Quarries Control Act they try to regulate, protect the property owners, as well as the Pit owners because that is what they are there for, to try and hear both sides. This municipality has expressed its concerns and has shown its efforts with regards to the roads and I don't foresee that they will open up every Township road for truck traffic and I think that is a valid comment. Barry Norman: Regarding the efforts that have been made to date on the seventh of Oro, there has been definitely calcium south of the Old Barrie Road and down to Highway #11, all kinds of calcium, but north of the Old Barrie Road, on the seventh, where all the pits are located and where we happen to live there is a little bit of calcium, there is a washboard road that has not been graded in a long time and that is where your truck traffic is. I would like to ask what effort has the Township made on that area to date because I havn't really seen much? Reeve Drury: I would like to bring the people up to date. We have budgetted $85,000.00 this year to go towards surveying and technical reports, soil testing, to go towards the seventh this year. There is a report coming forth from R. G. Robinson and Associates, our Engineering firm, as to what the cost would be to reconstruct that road. We will have a meeting with the Pit owners just as soon as we receive this report with the costs and hopefully we can then negotiate a good 1 for the people of the Township of Oro. Also the Pit owners will be able to bring their expertise forward and help build this road. To answer Bob Swerdon's question that when the road is reconstructed that there is going to be alot of trucks going some place else. We are now looking at doing winter construction in this program so that the trucks wi I not be routed else- where and to make It more convenient for the public. There is alot of planning that has to t place and it will not happen over night. - 9 - Pat Shellswell: Mr. Dru , I thought some of that winter construction was going to happen last year, did any happen? Reeve Drury: There was surveying done last year. Pat Shellswell: Will there be any done this year? It takesa long time when you are spending three to five million dollars to get it into place and spend it properly. Reeve Drury: Pat Shellswell: I have a question for Bev Nicolson. The seventh seems to be the designated truck route, do I have the right to go out and stop all the trucks that are going through the old Barrie Road and send them down the seventh? Reeve Drury: If there not on an appropriately designated haul route then they should be advised accordingly. The Deputy-Reeve has advised me that the Barrie Road is a designated haul route. Bev Nicolson: Scott Elliott: The concerns that have been voiced here today, I share them and I think our difficul arises in one a need and two a need to put a product that is needed in the market place and we can't pick where it is. The Sarjeant Company has been around for one hundred years now and we havn't done it by being obtrusive to people. Your concerns, we are trying to consider as best possible. One of them initially is certainly traffic and trucks. Unfortunately we can't take it out by helicopters, its not economical to do it that way. We did have a look at a place on the fourth of Oro and it did not look as suitable from the point of view of residents. The residents there told us it would be better if we went to the seventh and they helped us find a place. We actually have a letter in Council saying that at least we tryed to be responsive to them. Indeed the seventh line has Provincially significant resource. We have to address the problem of trucks and safety. In fact we have a letter here now and I will read part of it to you because I believe this is the first letter on record to Council with regards to roads. The problem is you have to use some road to get there. The best we can do there is try and control the safety of the trucks, control the road itsself and be considerate as possib I have here as well with me, in support) is Scott Brumwell from the Skelton and Company and Gary Bell who is a Planner for them as well. If I have questions I cannot answer for you then they can assist in that. Are there any questions about this property as it presently exists. This is a diagram of how the process 0 extraction will be conducted and what types of environmental protection are being taken. Scott Elliott: cont'd Bev Nicolson: Scott Elliott: Leon Musicco: Scott Elliott: I I I I I I I I II . I I I Lynn Murray: Scott Elliott: - 10 - We do net want to effect your property value a~d will make every effort to make sure that does not happen. In terŒ~ of truc~s, in another area where we operate a pit which is in the Town of Phelpstcn and has a higher concentration of peop:e than Edgar and what we did initially and it seems to have worked well, is I talked to the lady in the grocery store at the corner and if any truck goes through there too fast then she calls back to the scale house right away. The extraction would be done in stages and there is progressive rehabilitation as this is going on you cannot rehabilitate one acre at a time because you cannot dig down that abruptly. Our record of doing it is good, we have cleaned up other pits that we have gone into and we will continue to do that. Is there any other questions in regards to the extraction. What period of time would all of this take place? Our objective is not to move the materia: out of ~ere instantly, we do not want to deplete our resource we want it to last as long as possible. If mother nature ~as enough material in there it would be nice if it could last 50 years. As that happens there is progressive rehabilitation going on. You try to keep the minimum amount required open at a ti~e. If it is not there it will be a shorter period of time. Are you proposing to go within 5 feet of the water table? 1.3 metres is what is set. extracting under the water. point view we will not be that much water out but also going i~to the water table. We are not From our taking we are not Your personal presentation to me was that you may not use all the materials for your purposes there and you may have to wash for other people to come in and use materials that you can't use for your production. I think the public should be made aware that you might be selling the material on that property that you are not capable of using which does require washing. The on reason we would sell outside material really is to facilitate the extraction of other material. It is a secondary part of what we do. In the test holes that we took indicated very , excellent gravel so hopefully there wont be very much of that material. - 11 - I Scott Ellio~t: Much of the material that would be unsuitable, of which I hope there is very little, would be sold as a by- product on the open market. Barry Norma~: What volume of water do you anticipate in using? Scott Elliott: In Phelpston right now we are not using any water. If the aggregate is clean and of the tests that I have taken there and observed it is clean enough that I do not need to wash. Where we run into the need to wash is if the aggregate is dirty. It is hard to predict all that will be there. Washing is a more expensive way of processing and if we can do it without washing that is our preferred method. Barry Norman: How many gallons per minute are you trying to get out of the ground? What quantity are you going to have available if you need it? Scott Brumwell: If it is required, at that time a report would be prepared by a hydrogeologist which analizes the whole underground water regime. At this point in time we are not too sure of the volume involved. Barry Norman: Do you have an estimated volume required? Scott Brumwell: At this point in time I could not tell you, 1'm not sure. Barry Norman: You must have an idea, being in the business, what your firm would require? Scott Elliott: I know it uses a three inch line generally, it depends on your operation. It is not a fixed thing, depending on what the test report shows. We do not really want to use water it is more awkward for us to do that and the amount of water would be dictated by he requirements that are there or how quickly you wash, the rate of production. If there are any bad results from it we are responsible for correcting other peoples wells, it is cut and dry. If I drained your well from my operation, I have to fix your well or bring you water. Barry Norman: Is that an unwritten law or is it something in the PiŒ and Quarries Act, or is this just your company's policy? Scott Elliott: To me it is an automatic law, I believe, but it is our company policy to correct the situation if it occurs. We try really hard to get along with people, we are not one hundred years old by making everybody mad at us, we do not want to do that. hnother thing you mentioned if we could just run one p at a time, the number of pits does not necessarily dictate the number of trucks. We do not load a truck . - 12 - before seven dclock in the morni~g. Are there any other questions, I have certainly tryed to cover everything. Lynn Murray: You mentioned you live in a gravel pit now, could you please tell us where you are living? Scott Elliott: It is in Midhurst and I am actually right on a pond where they did go through a water table, it was a gravel pit for twenty or thirty years a~d now it has been redeveloped. Reeve Drury: (Introduced the four members from the Ministry of Natural Resources, and asked if they had any comments they would like to make). Mr. Fitzgerald: We are here to answer any questions to help the Council if anyone would like to ask questions of us. Reeve Drury: Are there any question for the Ministry of Natural Resources staff? If you have concerns about the Pit please come forward and ask them some quest s. Bob Cobbi: Is there a maximum amount that they can take out at anyone time fror anyone area? Mr. Fitzgerald: Each licenced pit has a tonnage limit. It is usually a supply and demand situation and when the market is good as it has been in the last few years most of the operations have been at there maximum or greater and have had to ask for an increase. The Reeve in closing the meeting, thanked those in atte~dance for their participation and stated that Council would give consideration to the arguments for and against the project, before reaching a decision. If anyone wished to be notified of the passing of the proposed by-law, they should leave their name and address with the Clerk. MOTION NO.1 Moved by Johnson, seconded by Burton Be it resolved that we do now adjourn this Special Public Meeting @ 8:35 p.m. Carried. ~- c~~ , - .- -~--- ' ~ " Reeœrt r~ -"..----...