The URL can be used to link to this page

06 22 2016 Council Agenda The Township of Oro-Medonte Council Meeting Agenda Council Chambers Wednesday, June 22, 2016 3:00 p.m. - Closed Session 7:00 p.m. - Open Session Page 1. Call to Order - Moment of Reflection: 2. Adoption of Agenda: 7 a) Motion to Adopt the Agenda. \[Addenda\] 3. Disclosure of Pecuniary Interest: 4. Closed Session Items: a) Motion to go In Closed Session. b) Motion to Rise and Report. c) Robin Dunn, CAO and Shawn Binns, Director, Recreation & Community Services re: Labour relations/employee negotiations (Operation Service Review and Administration Centre). d) Robin Dunn, CAO re: Labour relations/employee negotiations (Compensation) \[from 06 20 2016 Human Resources Committee\]. e) Robin Dunn, CAO re: Litigation affecting the municipality; Solicitor-client privilege (Burl's Creek) f) Robin Dunn, CAO re: Litigation affecting the municipality (12 Brook Street). g) Andria Leigh, Director, Development Services re: Litigation affecting the municipality (OMB Appeal Zoning By-law Amendment 2015-ZBA-01 (Lazy Dayz)) - Withdrawn. h) Andria Leigh, Director, Development Services re: Personal matter affecting an identifiable individual (Development Services). i) Shawn Binns, Director, Recreation & Community Services re: Litigation affecting the municipality (Oro-Medonte Community Centre). 5. Minutes of Council and Committees: 8 - 27a) Minutes of Council meeting held on Wednesday, June 8, 2016. 28 - 31 b) Minutes of Special Council meeting held on Wednesday, June 15, 2016. Page 1 of 491 Council Meeting Agenda - June 22, 2016 32 - 34 c) Minutes of Accessibility Advisory Committee meeting held on Monday, June 13, 2016. 35 - 38 d) Minutes of Human Resources Committee meeting held on Monday, June 20, 2016. 6. Recognition of Achievements: None. 7. Public Meetings: None. 8. Deputations: 39 - 48 a) 7:00 p.m. Jennifer Kunej re: Request to Permit Backyard Chickens. 9. Presentations: a) Joan Banbury re: 2016 Oro-Medonte Citizen of the Year Award Recipient. b) Walter Iles re: 2016 Ontario Senior of the Year Award Recipient. 49 - 164 c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. 10. Identification From the Public of an Agenda Item of Interest: Provides an opportunity for members of the public to identify an agenda item which the public member may request be brought forward and considered earlier in the meeting. 11. Open Forum: The Open Forum provides an opportunity for the public to provide verbal comments to Council, in Open Session, on matters scheduled on the current agenda, and shall be conducted as follows: Open Forum shall last no longer than 20 minutes; Each speaker shall be required to identify the agenda item they are speaking to and provide their name and address, which may become part of the public record; A speaker shall be limited to 2 minutes per agenda item; No response shall be provided to any question posed during Open Forum; No discussion, debate or decisions will occur during Open Forum; Each speaker is permitted to speak only once per agenda item; A speaker may provide comment on one agenda item and then shall step aside to enable another to provide comment on an agenda item; No speaker shall speak to a second agenda item until other individuals have had an opportunity to speak once; Speakers providing comment on the same agenda item, shall be Page 2 of 491 Council Meeting Agenda - June 22, 2016 requested to limit their comments so as to provide additional information and not repeat the same information provided by a previous speaker; Comments made during Open Forum will not form part of the minutes of the meeting; The following matters will not be permitted during Open Forum: o Comments/complaints against Members of Council or Township staff; o Matters beyond the jurisdiction of Council or the Township; o Closed Session agenda items, including current or pending litigation, or Insurance claims and/or pending claims by or against the Township; o Comments with respect to Minutes of Council and Committees; o Comments that are contrary to the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act; o Comments with respect to any applications which have proceeded through a Public Meeting in accordance with the Planning Act, with the exception of comment related to a recommendation contained within the Staff Report. The Chair may conclude Open Forum prior to the 20 minute maximum time limit, for non-compliance with the Open Forum parameters, Conduct of Members of the Public, or any other reason. 12. Reports of Municipal Officers: 165 - 188 a) Paul Gravelle, Director, Finance/Treasurer/Deputy CAO, re: Review of 2015 Draft Consolidated Financial Statements for the Year Ended December 31, 2015 \[to be distributed at the meeting\]. 189 - 191 b) Report No. FI2016-13, Paul Gravelle, Director, Finance/Treasurer/Deputy CAO re: Statement of Accounts - May 31, 2016. 192 - 195 c) Report No. FI2016-14, Paul Gravelle, Director, Finance/Treasurer/Deputy CAO re: Request for Interest Relief \[from 06 08 2016 Council meeting\]. 196 - 198 d) Report No. FI2016-15, Paul Gravelle, Director, Finance/Treasurer/Deputy CAO re: Renewal of Insurance Coverage. 199 - 223 e) Report No. CS2016-010, Doug Irwin, Director, Corporate Services/Clerk re: Draft Site Alteration By-law \[Refer to Item 17a)\]. 224 - 225 f) Report No. FD2016-04, Hugh Murray, Fire Chief re: Rogers Renewal Agreement \[Refer to Item 17g)\]. 226 - 230 g) Report No. RC2016-07, Shawn Binns, Director, Recreation and Community Services re: Recreation and Community Services Fees and Charges Review \[Refer to Item 17b)\]. 231 - 232 h) Report No. CSI2016-11, Donna Hewitt, Director, Corporate & Strategic Initiatives re: Communications and Engagement Strategy \[deferred from 03 09 2016 Council meeting\] \[to be deferred to 07 13 2016 Council meeting\]. Page 3 of 491 Council Meeting Agenda - June 22, 2016 233 - 278 i) Report No. CSI2016-17, Donna Hewitt, Director, Corporate & Strategic Initiatives re: Corporate Projects Status Update May 2016. 279 - 281 j) Report No. CSI2016-18, Donna Hewitt, Director, Corporate & Strategic Initiatives re: Craighurst First Impressions Community Exchange Project Implementation Update. 282 - 297 k) Report No. TES2016-15, Jerry Ball, Director, Transportation & Environmental Services re: Line 9 North Between Peter Street and Old County Road Emergency Culvert Replacement. 298 - 300 l) Report No. TES2016-16, Jerry Ball, Director, Transportation & Environmental Services re: Municipal Water Supply By-Law \[Refer to Item 17e)\]. 301 - 338 m) Report No. TES2016-17, Jerry Ball, Director, Transportation & Environmental Services re: Skyline Utilities - Horseshoe Interim Access Fee for Waste Water Service. 339 - 343 n) Report No. TES2016-18, Jerry Ball, Director, Transportation & Environmental Services re: Line 2 North Road Allowance (at Blueberry Marsh Road). 344 - 346 o) Jerry Ball, Director, Transportation & Environmental Services re: 5100 Line 3 North. 347 p) Doug Irwin, Director, Corporate Services/Clerk re: Reschedule of October 26, 2016 Council meeting due to Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) Hearing PL151011. 13. Reports of Members of Council: a) Updates from Council Representatives County of Simcoe and Township Partners and Agencies. 14. Consent Agenda: 348 - 351 a) Announcements of Interest to the Public: 1. Township of Oro-Medonte, Notice of Closure, Gore Road between Penetanguishene Road and Line 1 South, beginning Tuesday, February 16, 2016 and scheduled to re-open no later than August 15, 2016. 2. Township of Severn, Township of Oro-Medonte, Notice of Closure, Replacement of Severn Bridge No. 3 beginning Monday, June 27, 2016 and is scheduled to reopen no later than Friday, November 25, 2016. 3. Friday, July 1, 2016, Canada Day, Township Administration Centre Closure Notice. 4. Township of Oro-Medonte, Pound Service Notice. 352 - 409 b) Correspondence dated June 3, 2016 from Gayle Wood, CAO, Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority (NVCA) re: NVCA Phragmites and Invasive Species Action Plan. Page 4 of 491 Council Meeting Agenda - June 22, 2016 Staff Recommendation: Receive. 410 - 417 c) Minutes of Sustainability Plan Steering Committee (SPSC) meeting held on May 5, 2016. Staff Recommendation: Receive. 418 - 425 d) Minutes of Barrie Public Library meetings held on Thursday, April 28, 2016. Staff Recommendation: Receive. 426 - 428 e) Correspondence dated June 6, 2016 from Kathleen Wynne, Premier re: OMB Reform. Staff Recommendation: Receive. 429 - 430 f) Correspondence dated June 9, 2016 from Madeleine Meilleur, Attorney General re: Bill 158, Saving the Girl Next Door Act, 2016. Staff Recommendation: Receive. 15. Communications/Petitions: 431 a) Correspondence received June 13, 2016 from Simcoe County Federation of Agriculture re: Annual Barbeque and Country Rock Barn Dance, Thursday, July 7, 2016, 4:00 p.m., 192 Line 4 North, Oro-Medonte. 432 - 445 b) Correspondence dated June 14, 2016 from Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority re: Lake Simcoe Clean-up Fund and Lake Simcoe/South-eastern Georgian Bay Clean-Up Fund. 446 - 449 c) Correspondence dated June 16, 2016 from County of Simcoe re: 12th Annual Warden's Golf Tournament, September 1, 2016, Blue Mountain Golf and Country Club. 16. Notice of Motions: None. 17. By-Laws: 450 - 466 a) By-Law No. 2016-056: A By-law to Prohibit and Regulate the placing, dumping or removal of fill and the alteration of the grade within the Township of Oro-Medonte and to Repeal By-law Nos. 98-35, 98-134 and 2016-012 (Site Alteration By-law). 467 - 468 b) By-Law No. 2016-095: A By-Law to Amend By-Law, 2015--law of The Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte to Provide for the -law). 469 - 470 c) By-Law No. 2016-097: A By-law to Amend By-law No. 2011-177, Being a By-law to regulate, license and control canines within the Township of Oro- Medonte (Canine Control By-law). 471 - 477 d) By-Law No. 2016-098: A By-Law to Enter into an Agreement with Heartland Kennels to Provide Pound Keeper Services and to Repeal By-Law No. 2011- 082. Page 5 of 491 Council Meeting Agenda - June 22, 2016 478 - 486 e) By-Law No. 2016-100: A By-law to regulate Municipal Water Systems within the Township of Oro-Medonte and to Repeal By-law No. 2009-082 (Municipal Water Supply). 487 f) By-Law No. 2016-101: A By-law to Amend By-law No. 2015-092, A By-law to Provide for Remuneration and Expenses for Members of Council and Groups, and Expenses for Employees. 488 - 490 g) By-Law No. 2016-102: A By-law to Authorize the Execution of a Second Renewal and Amending Co-Location Agreement with Rogers Communications Inc. 18. Closed Session Items (Unfinished Items): 19. Confirmation By-Law: 491 a) By-Law No. 2016-094: Being a by-law to confirm the proceedings of the Council meeting held on Wednesday, June 22, 2016. 20. Questions from the Public Clarifying an Agenda Item: Questions from the Public Clarifying an Agenda Item provides an opportunity for the members of the public to seek clarification with respect to the decision which was made on an agenda item, the meaning of the decision and the next steps as a result of the decision. Questions from the Public Clarifying an Agenda Item shall last no longer than 10 minutes; Responses provided to questions posed during Questions from the Public Clarifying an Agenda Item shall be included within the 10 minute maximum time limit; Each speaker shall be required to identify the agenda item they are seeking clarification on and provide their name and address, which may become part of the public record; A speaker shall be limited to 1 minute per question; A speaker may pose a question and then shall step aside to enable another to pose a question; The Chair may conclude Questions from the Public Clarifying an Agenda Item prior to the 10 minute maximum time limit, for non- compliance with the above parameters, Conduct of Members of the Public, or any other reason. 21. Adjournment: a) Motion to Adjourn. Page 6 of 491 2.a) Motion to Adopt the Agenda. Page 7 of 491 5.a) Minutes of Council meeting held on Wednesday, June 8, 2... Page 8 of 491 5.a) Minutes of Council meeting held on Wednesday, June 8, 2... Page 9 of 491 5.a) Minutes of Council meeting held on Wednesday, June 8, 2... Page 10 of 491 5.a) Minutes of Council meeting held on Wednesday, June 8, 2... Page 11 of 491 5.a) Minutes of Council meeting held on Wednesday, June 8, 2... Page 12 of 491 5.a) Minutes of Council meeting held on Wednesday, June 8, 2... Page 13 of 491 5.a) Minutes of Council meeting held on Wednesday, June 8, 2... Page 14 of 491 5.a) Minutes of Council meeting held on Wednesday, June 8, 2... Page 15 of 491 5.a) Minutes of Council meeting held on Wednesday, June 8, 2... Page 16 of 491 5.a) Minutes of Council meeting held on Wednesday, June 8, 2... Page 17 of 491 5.a) Minutes of Council meeting held on Wednesday, June 8, 2... Page 18 of 491 5.a) Minutes of Council meeting held on Wednesday, June 8, 2... Page 19 of 491 5.a) Minutes of Council meeting held on Wednesday, June 8, 2... Page 20 of 491 5.a) Minutes of Council meeting held on Wednesday, June 8, 2... Page 21 of 491 5.a) Minutes of Council meeting held on Wednesday, June 8, 2... Page 22 of 491 5.a) Minutes of Council meeting held on Wednesday, June 8, 2... Page 23 of 491 5.a) Minutes of Council meeting held on Wednesday, June 8, 2... Page 24 of 491 5.a) Minutes of Council meeting held on Wednesday, June 8, 2... Page 25 of 491 5.a) Minutes of Council meeting held on Wednesday, June 8, 2... Page 26 of 491 5.a) Minutes of Council meeting held on Wednesday, June 8, 2... Page 27 of 491 5.b) Minutes of Special Council meeting held on Wednesday, J... Page 28 of 491 5.b) Minutes of Special Council meeting held on Wednesday, J... Page 29 of 491 5.b) Minutes of Special Council meeting held on Wednesday, J... Page 30 of 491 5.b) Minutes of Special Council meeting held on Wednesday, J... Page 31 of 491 5.c) Minutes of Accessibility Advisory Committee meeting hel... Page 32 of 491 5.c) Minutes of Accessibility Advisory Committee meeting hel... Page 33 of 491 5.c) Minutes of Accessibility Advisory Committee meeting hel... Page 34 of 491 5.d) Minutes of Human Resources Committee meeting held on Mo... Page 35 of 491 5.d) Minutes of Human Resources Committee meeting held on Mo... Page 36 of 491 5.d) Minutes of Human Resources Committee meeting held on Mo... Page 37 of 491 5.d) Minutes of Human Resources Committee meeting held on Mo... Page 38 of 491 8.a) 7:00 p.m. Jennifer Kunej re: Request to Permit Backyard... Page 39 of 491 8.a) 7:00 p.m. Jennifer Kunej re: Request to Permit Backyard... Page 40 of 491 8.a) 7:00 p.m. Jennifer Kunej re: Request to Permit Backyard... CHICKENS Kunej Jennifer DeputationBy: BACKYARD Page 41 of 491 8.a) 7:00 p.m. Jennifer Kunej re: Request to Permit Backyard... our from. proper rich to and other eggs. and waste and going comes for nutrient bought ticks food depression wastetime with store our responsibility grubs, than anxiety, gardens reducing where about eliminating eating organically. up our Chickens reduce about learn grow nutritious to waste picked to control provides be moreyard families pest to proven gardens also be at for and children Backyard to our This been for great food of garbage help lessons arehave proven animals. to less arerecycle for EggsChickensChickensTheyTeachableOpportunities insects.stress.landfill,management.manurecare Benefits Page 42 of 491 8.a) 7:00 p.m. Jennifer Kunej re: Request to Permit Backyard... Resident Medonte Oro Future D. Samuel Page 43 of 491 8.a) 7:00 p.m. Jennifer Kunej re: Request to Permit Backyard... Page 44 of 491 8.a) 7:00 p.m. Jennifer Kunej re: Request to Permit Backyard... a in of with the months. if disposed cold provided be hen, over residence, chickens. must per dwelling. the warm run laying complaint. not law and profit. void. manure chickens. and prey. egg is wells) for 6 provisions: safe and By neighbours keep coop from chickens sold a legitimate to keep rivers, these a cleanaddress in the be to is chickens able of abutting protect not that kept ablebe follow space (lakes, to at there the keep will to prohibited. be if owner evaluation. to fence. coops to must night are container. water property. from Eggs Chicken the enough with chickens high to per over areas feet property revoked from perch, heated proof permit only. manner. a given turkeys a 20 foot be basis have and acre feet 4 coopuse safeto a and with will trial 30 1/3chickensattached rodent least attain a a is residentialat six with to in secure a year ducks least humanely, permit ofa in 1 personal in least fee at a keptwinterized in chickens provided for kept the at for Backyard as bebe chickens $25 geese, be kept fencedkept keep permitted. as havecared food,kept environmentally pay start chickensbe maximum mustbebemust to keep moves, must a bebe not of and and to will such must must be must are willmust mustwill coopscoopsfeed law holder fowl will water timely permit by keeping allowance ResidentsChickensThe TheResidentsChickenThereChickensRoostersOtherChickensChickensChickenChickenChickensTheThis freshsafe,permit Proposed Page 45 of 491 8.a) 7:00 p.m. Jennifer Kunej re: Request to Permit Backyard... and on change: Victoria, the working made Vancouver, are Medonte have that Oro that Edmonton, Bay, Cities Cities Thunder and and Peterborough, change: a Essa, Clearview, Severn,Orillia, Whitehorse. Townships Townshipsmaking Page 46 of 491 8.a) 7:00 p.m. Jennifer Kunej re: Request to Permit Backyard... Questions? Page 47 of 491 8.a) 7:00 p.m. Jennifer Kunej re: Request to Permit Backyard... Page 48 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 49 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 50 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 51 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 52 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 53 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 54 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 55 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 56 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. ytiroirP Page 57 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 58 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 59 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 60 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 61 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 62 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 63 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 64 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 65 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 66 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 67 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 68 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 69 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 70 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. roads Minimummaintenance standards are not established for Class 6 Page 71 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 72 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 73 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 74 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 75 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 76 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 77 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 78 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 79 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 80 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 81 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. 52% 30% 17% 48% 32% 21% 47% 36% 18% 68% 14% 18% 63%63% 25% 12% 44% 28% 28% 44% 29% 27% Page 82 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 83 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 84 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 85 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 86 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 87 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 88 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 89 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 90 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 91 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 92 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 93 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 94 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 95 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. 55% 39% 7% 62% 33% 5% Page 96 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 97 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 98 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 99 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 100 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 101 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 102 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 103 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 104 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 105 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 106 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. 63% 32% 5% 48%48% 41%41% 12% 63% 30% 7% 49% 37% 20% Page 107 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 108 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 109 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 110 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 111 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 112 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 113 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 114 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 115 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 116 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 117 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 118 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 119 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 120 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 121 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 122 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 123 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 124 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 125 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 126 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 127 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 128 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 129 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 130 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 131 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 132 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 133 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 134 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 135 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 136 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 137 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 138 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 139 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 140 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 141 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 142 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 143 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 144 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 145 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 146 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 147 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 148 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 149 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 150 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 151 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 152 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 153 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Medonte - Page 154 of 491 Corporation of the Township of OroPresentation of Draft Report to Township Council 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Medonte Operations Department Service Review - Township of Oro Page 155 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Medonte Operations Department Service Review - Township of Oro Page 156 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Medonte Operations Department Service Review - Township of Oro Page 157 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Medonte Operations Department Service Review - Township of Oro Page 158 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Medonte Operations Department Service Review - Township of Oro Page 159 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Medonte Operations Department Service Review - Township of Oro Page 160 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Medonte Operations Department Service Review - Township of Oro Page 161 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Medonte Operations Department Service Review - Township of Oro ytiroirP Page 162 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Medonte Operations Department Service Review - Township of Oro Page 163 of 491 9.c) Oscar Poloni, KPMG re: Operation Service Review. Page 164 of 491 12.a) Paul Gravelle, Director, Finance/Treasurer/Deputy CAO,... Page 165 of 491 12.a) Paul Gravelle, Director, Finance/Treasurer/Deputy CAO,... Page 166 of 491 12.a) Paul Gravelle, Director, Finance/Treasurer/Deputy CAO,... Page 167 of 491 12.a) Paul Gravelle, Director, Finance/Treasurer/Deputy CAO,... Page 168 of 491 12.a) Paul Gravelle, Director, Finance/Treasurer/Deputy CAO,... Page 169 of 491 12.a) Paul Gravelle, Director, Finance/Treasurer/Deputy CAO,... Page 170 of 491 12.a) Paul Gravelle, Director, Finance/Treasurer/Deputy CAO,... Page 171 of 491 12.a) Paul Gravelle, Director, Finance/Treasurer/Deputy CAO,... Page 172 of 491 12.a) Paul Gravelle, Director, Finance/Treasurer/Deputy CAO,... Page 173 of 491 12.a) Paul Gravelle, Director, Finance/Treasurer/Deputy CAO,... Page 174 of 491 12.a) Paul Gravelle, Director, Finance/Treasurer/Deputy CAO,... Page 175 of 491 12.a) Paul Gravelle, Director, Finance/Treasurer/Deputy CAO,... Page 176 of 491 12.a) Paul Gravelle, Director, Finance/Treasurer/Deputy CAO,... Page 177 of 491 12.a) Paul Gravelle, Director, Finance/Treasurer/Deputy CAO,... Page 178 of 491 12.a) Paul Gravelle, Director, Finance/Treasurer/Deputy CAO,... Page 179 of 491 12.a) Paul Gravelle, Director, Finance/Treasurer/Deputy CAO,... Page 180 of 491 12.a) Paul Gravelle, Director, Finance/Treasurer/Deputy CAO,... Page 181 of 491 12.a) Paul Gravelle, Director, Finance/Treasurer/Deputy CAO,... Page 182 of 491 12.a) Paul Gravelle, Director, Finance/Treasurer/Deputy CAO,... Page 183 of 491 12.a) Paul Gravelle, Director, Finance/Treasurer/Deputy CAO,... Page 184 of 491 12.a) Paul Gravelle, Director, Finance/Treasurer/Deputy CAO,... Page 185 of 491 12.a) Paul Gravelle, Director, Finance/Treasurer/Deputy CAO,... Page 186 of 491 12.a) Paul Gravelle, Director, Finance/Treasurer/Deputy CAO,... Page 187 of 491 12.a) Paul Gravelle, Director, Finance/Treasurer/Deputy CAO,... Page 188 of 491 12.b) Report No. FI2016-13, Paul Gravelle, Director, Finance... Page 189 of 491 12.b) Report No. FI2016-13, Paul Gravelle, Director, Finance... Page 190 of 491 12.b) Report No. FI2016-13, Paul Gravelle, Director, Finance... Page 191 of 491 12.c) Report No. FI2016-14, Paul Gravelle, Director, Finance... Page 192 of 491 12.c) Report No. FI2016-14, Paul Gravelle, Director, Finance... Page 193 of 491 12.c) Report No. FI2016-14, Paul Gravelle, Director, Finance... Page 194 of 491 12.c) Report No. FI2016-14, Paul Gravelle, Director, Finance... Page 195 of 491 12.d) Report No. FI2016-15, Paul Gravelle, Director, Finance... Page 196 of 491 12.d) Report No. FI2016-15, Paul Gravelle, Director, Finance... Page 197 of 491 12.d) Report No. FI2016-15, Paul Gravelle, Director, Finance... Page 198 of 491 12.e) Report No. CS2016-010, Doug Irwin, Director, Corporate... Page 199 of 491 12.e) Report No. CS2016-010, Doug Irwin, Director, Corporate... Page 200 of 491 12.e) Report No. CS2016-010, Doug Irwin, Director, Corporate... Page 201 of 491 12.e) Report No. CS2016-010, Doug Irwin, Director, Corporate... Page 202 of 491 12.e) Report No. CS2016-010, Doug Irwin, Director, Corporate... Page 203 of 491 12.e) Report No. CS2016-010, Doug Irwin, Director, Corporate... Page 204 of 491 12.e) Report No. CS2016-010, Doug Irwin, Director, Corporate... Page 205 of 491 12.e) Report No. CS2016-010, Doug Irwin, Director, Corporate... Page 206 of 491 12.e) Report No. CS2016-010, Doug Irwin, Director, Corporate... The Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte By-law No. 2016-056 Being a By-law to Prohibit and Regulate the placing, dumping or removal of fill and the alteration of the grade within the Township of Oro-Medonte. (Site Alteration By-law) Whereas section 142 of the Nvojdjqbm!Bdu-!3112, S.O. 2001, c. 25, as amended, authorizes the Council of The Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte to pass by- laws for prohibiting or regulating the placing, dumping or removal of fill of any kind, for prohibiting or regulating the removal of topsoil, and for prohibiting or regulating the alteration of the grade of land; And Whereas Council deems it in the public interest to regulate the dumping and placing of fill, the removal of topsoil, and other site alteration in order to ensure that existing drainage patterns are maintained and that any changes to existing drainage patterns are appropriate to protect environmental features; to prevent the importation of hazardous material and to keep the disturbance of landform characteristics to a minimum; Now Therefore the Council of The Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte hereby enacts as follows: 1. Tha attached hereto, form part of this By-law. 2. That this By--. 3. That all existing Site Alterations within the boundaries of the Township shall have one (1) month from the date of its final passing to obtain the required permits in accordance with this By-law. 4. That By-law Nos. 2016-012, 98-134 and 98-35 are hereby repealed in their entirety. 5. And that this By-law shall come into force and effect on the date of its final passing. By-law read a First, Second and Third time, and Passed this 27th day of April, 2016. The Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte Mayor, H.S. Hughes Clerk, J. Douglas Irwin Page 1 of 17 Page 207 of 491 12.e) Report No. CS2016-010, Doug Irwin, Director, Corporate... Appendix to By-law No. 2016-056 for The Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte 1.0 Definitions For the purpose of this By-law, the following definitions shall apply: means lands that are used by a farming business registered under the Gbsn!Sfhjtusbujpo!boe!Gbsn!Pshboj{bujpo!Gvoejoh!Bdu-! 2::4, S.O. 1993, c. 21, as amended, for the growing of crops, including nursery and horticultural crops; raising livestock; raising of other animals for food, fur, fibre, including poultry and fish, aquaculture, apiaries, agro-forestry, maple syrup production; -means this Site Alteration By-law; means any body of flowing or standing water, whether naturally or artificially created; means the chief building official of the Township and shall include any person authorized by the chief building official to carry out any of the powers or duties of the Chief Building Official pursuant to this By-law; ring and gmeans the removal of all surface objects, brush, roots and other protruding obstructions, trees and stumps which result in the removal of topsoil or the alteration of grade of the land; means an application and contents as described in Section 4 of this By-law; "Conservation Authority" means the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority or the Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority; Council means the Council for the Township of Oro-Medonte; means the County of Simcoe; means the Director, Development Services and/or their designate; Drainage means the movement of water to a place of disposal, whether by way of the natural characteristics of the ground surface or by an artificial method; Dump, dumped or dumping means the depositing of fill in a location other than where the fill was obtained and includes the movement or depositing of fill from one location on land to another location on the same land; Erosion means the detachment and movement of soil, sediment or rock fragments by water, wind, ice or gravity; means any type of material deposited or placed on land and includes soil, stone, concrete, asphalt, dirt, sod or turf either singularly or in combination; Grade means the elevation of the ground surface of lands and shall be comprised of each of the following, as may be applicable: (i) Existing grade means the elevation of the existing ground surface of the lands upon which dumping and/or placing of fill or other site alteration is proposed and of abutting ground surface up to 3 metres wide surrounding such lands, except that where placing or dumping of fill or other site alteration has occurred in contravention of this By-law, existing grade shall mean the ground surface of the lands as it existed prior to the dumping or placing of fill or to any other site alteration; Page 2 of 17 Page 208 of 491 12.e) Report No. CS2016-010, Doug Irwin, Director, Corporate... (ii) Finished grade means the approved elevation of ground surface of lands upon which fill has been placed in accordance with this By-law; (iii) Proposed grade means the proposed elevation of ground surface of land upon which fill is proposed to be placed; Inspector means individuals appointed as inspectors or municipal law enforcement officers and/or their respective designates under this By-law; means a parcel of land, described in a deed or other document legally capable of being conveyed, or shown as a block on a registered plan of subdivision; means a notice of a contravention of a by-law pursuant to subsection 444(1) of the Nvojdjqbm!Bdu-!3112; means an order issued pursuant to subsection 445(1) of the Nvojdjqbm!Bdu-!3112; means the person registered as the owner on title upon which the site alteration is proposed or occurring and any person, firm or corporation managing or controlling such lands; means a permit issued pursuant to this By-law; "Place, placed or placing" means the distribution of fill on lands to establish a finished grade different from the existing grade; means the accumulation of surface water in an area not having drainage there from where the lack of drainage is caused by the placing or dumping of fill or other site alteration; P means the same as defined under O. Reg. 153/04 under the Fowjsponfoubm!Qspufdujpo!Bdu, R.S.O. 1990, c. E.19, as amended; Tree C means an arborist certified by the International Society of Arboriculture who has a diploma (minimum) in arboriculture or urban forestry; Retaining wall means a wall designed to contain and support fill which has a finished grade higher than that of adjacent lands; means a certified cheque, cash or an irrevocable letter of credit in a form acceptable to the Inspector and the Treasurer; Site alteration means the placing or dumping of fill on land, the removal of topsoil from land, or the alteration of the grade of land by any means including placing fill, clearing and grubbing, the compaction of soil or the creation of impervious surfaces, or any combination of these activities; means material commonly known as earth, topsoil, loam, clay, sand or gravel; Topsoil means those horizons in a soil profile, commonly known as the "0" and "A" horizons, containing organic material and includes deposits of partially decomposed organic matter such as peat; Township means The Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte; means a natural or man-made channel or swale in which water flows, either continuously or intermittently with some degree of regularity; means land such as a swamp, marsh, bog or fen not including land that is being used for agricultural purposes and no longer exhibits wetland characteristics that: (i) is seasonally or permanently covered by shallow water or has the water table close to or at the surface; and Page 3 of 17 Page 209 of 491 12.e) Report No. CS2016-010, Doug Irwin, Director, Corporate... (ii) has hydro-soils and vegetation dominated by hydrophilic or water-tolerant plants. - means any by-law enacted by the Township pursuant to section 34 of the Qmboojoh!Bdu, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended. 2.0 Regulations 2.1 No person shall place or dump any fill, remove any topsoil or otherwise alter the grade of land by causing, permitting or performing any other form of site alteration on land within the Township without the owner first receiving a permit issued under this By-law by the Director. 2.2 No person shall place or dump any fill, remove any topsoil or otherwise alter the grade of land by causing, permitting or performing any other form of site alteration on land zoned Environmental Protection or Open Space as identified in the Zoning By-law, or within or adjacent to a watercourse, flood plain or a wetland or other such regulated areas pursuant to O. Reg. 182/06 made pursuant section 28 of the Dpotfswbujpo!Bvuipsjujft!Bdu, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.27, as amended, unless approval has been issued by the applicable Conservation Authority and a permit issued pursuant to this By-law. 2.3 No person shall fail to comply with an order issued pursuant to Section 10 of this By-law. 2.4 No person, in the performance of a site alteration, shall injure or destroy a municipal tree or other trees which are subject to tree protection measures as a condition of a permit issued pursuant to this By-law except to the extent that such injure or destruction is specifically authorized in writing in accordance with provisions of this By-law and any other applicable By-laws of the Township or the Conservation Authority or the County. 2.5 No person shall perform a site alteration on any land unless it is done at the request of or with the consent of the owner of the land where the site alteration is to occur. 2.6 No person shall place or dump fill or cause or permit fill to be placed or dumped unless such fill complies with the standards established by the Ministry of Environment and Climate Change for clean fill, as described in Sections 4.16 and 4.22 of this By-law. 2.7 No person shall place, or dump any fill, remove any topsoil or otherwise alter the grade of land by causing, permitting or performing any form of site alteration which would interfere with existing drainage patterns of adjacent lands, or cause obstructions to existing drainage flows or obstruct or impede the function of flow of existing drainage swales or cause additional surface and ground waters to be discharged onto adjacent lands. 2.8 No person shall place, or dump any fill, remove any topsoil or otherwise alter the grade of land by causing, permitting or performing any form of site alteration which would cause surface drainage to flow, discharge or be directed onto adjacent lands other than directly into a natural watercourse or approved municipal, County or Provincial drainage system. 2.9 No person shall perform a site alteration or permit the performance of a site alteration during the following times: 2.9.1 Between the hours of 7:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. Monday to Friday; 2.9.2 Between the hours of 12:00 a.m. and 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. to 11:59 p.m. on Saturdays; 2.9.3 Anytime on Sundays or on any holiday as defined in the Sfubjmfe! Cvtjoftt!Ipmjebzt!Bdu, R.S.O. 1990, c. R.30, as amended; or Page 4 of 17 Page 210 of 491 12.e) Report No. CS2016-010, Doug Irwin, Director, Corporate... 2.9.4 As set out in the conditions of the permit or in any agreement made pursuant to this By-law. 3.0 Exemptions 3.1 This By-law is not applicable to the following: 3.1.1 The use, operation, establishment, alteration, enlargement or extension of a waste management system or waste disposal site within the meaning of Part V of the Fowjsponfoubm!Qspufdujpo!Bdu or a waste, waste disposal or waste management system that is exempted by regulation from said Part V; 3.1.2 The construction, extension, alteration, maintenance or operation of works under section 26 of the Qvcmjd!Usbotqpsubujpo!boe!Ijhixbz! Jnqspwfnfou!Bdu, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.50, as amended; 3.1.3 Emergency measures taken by the Township, County or Conservation Authority or any other federal, provincial or governmental agency or body, to prevent flooding, erosion, slipping of soil or damage of trees; 3.1.4 The activities of the Township, County or the Conservation Authority related but not limited to the establishment or maintenance of utilities and services, roads, bridges, flood and erosion control facilities, walkways, bicycle paths, fences, retaining walls, steps and lighting; 3.1.5 The placing or dumping of fill, removal of topsoil or alteration of the grade of land as a condition to the approval of a site plan, a plan of subdivision or a consent under section 41, 51 or 53 of the Qmboojoh! Bdu, or as a requirement of a site plan agreement or subdivision agreement entered into under those sections; 3.1.6 The placing or dumping of fill, removal of topsoil or alteration of the grade of land as a condition to a development permit authorized by regulation made under section 70.2 of the Qmboojoh Bdu or as a requirement of an agreement entered into under that regulation; 3.1.7 Aggregate (as defined in the Bhhsfhbuf!Sftpvsdft!Bdu, R.S.O. 1990, c. A.8, as amended) brought onto a pit or quarry operating under a licence or wayside permit issued under that statute as part of the operations of that pit or quarry; 3.1.8 The placing or dumping of fill, removal of topsoil or alteration of the grade of land undertaken on land described in a licence and/or site plan for a pit or quarry or a permit for a wayside pit or wayside quarry issued/approved under the Bhhsfhbuf!Sftpvsdft!Bdu; 3.1.9 The placing or dumping of fill, removal of topsoil or alteration of the grade of land undertaken on land in order to lawfully establish and operate or enlarge any pit or quarry on land, (i) that has not been designated under the Bhhsfhbuf!Sftpvsdft! Bdu!or a predecessor of that statute; and (ii) on which a pit or quarry is a permitted land use under a by-law passed under section 34 of the Qmboojoh!Bdu; 3.1.10 Any rehabilitation or filling activity in a pit or quarry licensed under the Bhhsfhbuf!Sftpvsdft!Bdu, and specifically addressed on the approved site plan when there is insufficient overburden retained to rehabilitate such pit or quarry in accordance with that statute; 3.1.11 The placing or dumping of fill, removal of topsoil or alteration of the grade of land undertaken as an incidental part of the drain construction Page 5 of 17 Page 211 of 491 12.e) Report No. CS2016-010, Doug Irwin, Director, Corporate... under the Esbjobhf!Bdu, R.S.O. 1990, c. D.17, as amended, or the Ujmf! Esbjobhf!Bdu, R.S.O. 1990, c. T.8, as amended; 3.1.12 The placing or dumping of fill, removal of topsoil or alteration of the grade of land undertaken by a transmitter or distributor, as those terms are defined in section 2 of the Fmfdusjdjuz!Bdu-!2::9, S.O. 1998, c. 15, Schedule A, as amended, for the purpose of constructing and maintaining a transmission system or a distribution system, as those terms are defined in that section; 3.1.13 The removal of topsoil from Agricultural Lands incidental to a normal agricultural practice including such removal as an incidental part of sod-farming, greenhouse operations and nurseries for horticultural products. This exception does not include the removal of topsoil for sale, exchange or other disposition; 3.1.14 The harvesting of peat in a commercial operation as approved by the Conservation Authority. 3.2 Section 2.1 does not apply to the following: 3.2.1 Construction where a permit authorized under the Cvjmejoh!Dpef!Bdu-! 2::3, S.O. 1992, c. 23, as amended, has been issued by the Chief Building Official including erection, installation, construction demolition of a single family dwelling, structure or on-site sewage system where an approved lot grading plan is in place or the site plan accompanying the building permit application provides sufficient information to determine that the placing or dumping of fill conforms with provisions of this By-law and the amount of fill to be dumped or placed pursuant to the building permit does not exceed 750 cubic metres; 3.2.2 The placing or dumping of fill in an excavation to the elevation of existing grade following the demolition or removal of a building or structure for which a building permit has been issued; 3.2.3 Fill being placed or dumped on lands for the purpose of flood or erosion control to establish finished grade shown on a grading and drainage plan approved by the Conservation Authority, County or by the Township in conjunction with a subdivision approval; 3.2.4 Site alteration involving an amount of soil of less than fifty (50) cubic metres on a lot within any one-year period, provided that there is no significant change in the direction or rate of drainage to the neighboring properties, and unless the site includes or is adjacent to a body of water. Such alteration shall not take place within sixty (60) centimetres of any property line; 3.2.5 The resurfacing or paving of existing driveways where there is no alteration to the existing driveway base and no significant change in the direction or rate of drainage to neighboring properties; and 3.2.6 Replacement of topsoil for restoration of agricultural lands used for normal agricultural practices, as an incidental part of sod farming, greenhouse operations, and nurseries for horticultural practices. Storage of such topsoil shall not exceed one thousand (1000) cubic metres. 4.0 Requirements for Issuance of a Permit 4.1 The owner applying for a permit under this By-law shall have a pre-consultation meeting with the Director and any other person/agency that maybe necessary, in order to review the proposal to determine if a permit can be issued under the requirements of this By-law. 4.2 An owner applying for a permit shall provide the following: Page 6 of 17 Page 212 of 491 12.e) Report No. CS2016-010, Doug Irwin, Director, Corporate... 4.2.1 A completed application form; 4.2.2 The name, address, and contact telephone number of the owner of the land upon which the fill is to be dumped or placed or other site alteration is to occur; 4.2.3 The municipal address of the land on which the fill is to be dumped or placed or other site alteration is to occur; 4.2.4 Legal description of the land upon which the fill is to be dumped or placed or other site alteration is to occur; 4.2.5 The applicable fee calculated in accordance with the rates set out in S-law at the time of application; 4.2.6 A scale drawing of any retaining wall that may be required and a description, including dimensions, of any materials to be used in the construction of such retaining wall; 4.2.7 Security in the amount -law for returning the land to a condition and/or including damages and cleaning as required satisfactory to the Director and/or Inspector; 4.2.8 A site alteration plan, based on an identified legal survey if required by the Inspector, accurately indicating the following, as required and to the satisfaction of the Inspector: 4.2.8.1 The property lines of the lands for the site alteration with dimensions, 4.2.8.2 A topographic survey at one metres contour intervals certified by a professional engineer or Ontario Land Surveyor defining all materials and manmade features, including top and bottom of slopes, drainage patterns, tree lines, buildings, and stockpiles on the lands and within thirty (30) metres on abutting lands and water bodies, 4.2.8.3 All existing storm sewers, ditches, swales, creeks, watercourses and wetlands on the lands and on abutting lands and public highways, 4.2.8.4 All existing buildings, the species and size of all trees, the location of all shrubs and driveways on the lands and of all easements and right-of-ways over, under, across or through the lands, 4.2.8.5 Proposed grades and drainage systems upon completion of the site alteration, 4.2.8.6 All proposed ground covering to be used upon completion of the site alteration operation, and 4.2.8.7 All erosion, sediment and tree protection measures for site alteration operation. 4.2.9 A description of the fill proposed to be dumped or placed including a detailed description of the source of the fill with a letter from the party from whom the fill is being acquired attesting that the fill meets the requirements for clean fill as per Section 4.16 or 4.22 if applicable, of this By-law, the quantity of fill (expressed in cubic metres), and the proposed location of the fill on the lands, and shall include contact information, if required by the Inspector; Page 7 of 17 Page 213 of 491 12.e) Report No. CS2016-010, Doug Irwin, Director, Corporate... 4.2.10 A signed authorization by the owner of the land on which the work is to be performed, or by a person authorized, in writing, to act as an agent for such owner, certifying the correctness of all the information in the application; 4.2.11 A signed authorization of a grantee(s) of any easement within the property accepting the placing or dumping of fill or other site alteration on or abutting any easement; 4.2.12 The Official Plan designation and zoning of the property; 4.2.13 For lands that are regulated under the applicable Conservation Authority, the application shall be accompanied by any and all documents, reports or studies required by such plan(s) to demonstrate compliance with their provisions; 4.2.14 Such tree reports prepared by a Qualified Tree Consultant as may be required by the Inspector; and 4.2.15 Any other study, report, plan, drawing or material related to the application as deemed necessary by the Inspector or Director to constitute a complete application. 4.3 If the land that is the subject of the permit application is, in the opinion of the Inspector of an environmentally sensitive or significant nature, he/she may seek comments/approvals from the Conservation Authority to assist in the permit process and such comments shall form part of the completed application. 4.4 In reviewing any application, the Inspector may seek comments/approvals from any other agency he/she deems necessary and such comments shall form part of the completed application. 4.5 As a condition of the issuance of a permit, the Inspector may require the owner of the land which is subject of the permit either prior to the permit being issued or after the permit has been issued to comply with one or more of the following: 4.5.1 Notify the Inspector in writing within forty-eight (48) hours of commencing any work; 4.5.2 Construct a retaining wall including a safety fence which does not encroach upon lands abutting the land on which the work is to be performed, (retaining walls one (1) metre or higher may be subject to a building permit pursuant to the Cvjmejoh!Dpef!Bdu-!2::3) and conforms with the Zoning By-law, as amended; 4.5.3 Ensure that fill is placed or dumped in such a manner, and any retaining wall containing such fill is erected in such a manner, and any other site alteration is conducted is such a manner, that no ponding is caused on abutting lands and that the adequate provision is made to permit proper surface storm water drainage; 4.5.4 Provide appropriate protection for environmentally sensitive or significant land; 4.5.5 Install and maintain the erosion and sediment control measures as identified in the approved site alteration plan and the latest guidelines for erosion measures of the Conservation Authority; 4.5.6 Notify Inspector in writing of the completion of any erosion control measures within seven (7) days after their installation; 4.5.7 Inspect the erosion control measures at least once a week and after each significant rainfall and make all needed repairs immediately; 4.5.8 Obtain the permission of the Inspector in writing prior to modifying the approved site alteration plan; Page 8 of 17 Page 214 of 491 12.e) Report No. CS2016-010, Doug Irwin, Director, Corporate... 4.5.9 Keep, maintain, and make available for inspection upon request of the Inspector, the following records in a good and business-like manner: 4.5.9.1 Full and complete legal name, and business name if different from the legal name, of each hauler, 4.5.9.2 The commercial vehicle registration number of each hauler, 4.5.9.3 The motor vehicle permit number of the motor vehicles owned and operated by each hauler, 4.5.9.4 The date and time of each delivery of fill, 4.5.9.5 The point of origin of each delivery of fill, 4.5.9.6 The volume of each delivery, 4.5.9.7 The content of material of each delivery of fill, and 4.5.9.8 Any other information required by the Inspector. 4.5.10 Provide to the Inspector a report from a Qualified Person with knowledge in respect to the source and nature of the fill to be placed or dumped, that all fill meets standards prescribed by the Ministry of Environment and Climate Change for any current land use and any future land use for the land designated under an Official Plan approved by Council for the Township or Council for the County; 4.5.11 Notify the Inspector of the commencement, the completion and of the various stages of performance of the work in any site alteration on land and to permit and make available the land for inspection at each of these times; 4.5.12 Install all tree protection measures required by the approved site alteration plan prior to commencing any work and to maintain these tree protection measures throughout the entire duration of the work; 4.5.13 Provide that all fill shall not be placed or dumped around the perimeter of any existing building unless such building and its foundation walls are evaluated and reinforced in accordance with accepted engineering and constructed practice, and an appropriate building permit has been issued by the Township; 4.5.14 Provide adequate drainage from the land on which the works is to be performed in accordance with a drainage agreement if applicable, and in any event in accordance with an approved site alteration, reasonable environmental practices, and proper engineering practices; 4.5.15 Ensure that no trench in which drainage piping is laid is covered and backfilled until the work has been inspected by the Qualified Person; 4.5.16 Remove the topsoil prior to the performance of the work in the alteration of the grade or the placing or dumping of fill; 4.5.17 Provide a detailed map, approved by the Inspector outlining the route that all trucks will take to and from the site as identified on the application; 4.5.18 Provide security to ensure the maintenance of the highways that are under the jurisdiction of the Township and that are being used by the trucks delivering or removing the fill in a state of repair and free from dust and mud; Page 9 of 17 Page 215 of 491 12.e) Report No. CS2016-010, Doug Irwin, Director, Corporate... 4.5.19 Ensure that the finished grade surface is protected by sod, turf, seeding for grass, greenery, asphalt, concrete or such other material shown on submitted plans; 4.5.20 Ensure that all fill used is material that does not contain any putrescible material and to the satisfaction of the Qualified Person meets any of the following criteria: 4.5.20.1 Rock, including demolition debris such as domestic brick and concrete that does not contain cement fines, exposed rebar, paint or coatings, decomposable materials, plastic, asphalt, petroleum products, hydrocarbon materials and any putrescible organic materials, 4.5.20.2 Soil that the standards set out in Table 1 of the soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards referenced in O. Reg. 153/04 as amended, 4.5.20.3 Liquid slurry materials to the extent that the free water is removed and the resulting wet or slurred material meets the standards set out in Table 1 of the soil, Ground Water Sediment Standards referenced in O. Reg. 153/04, and any free water from the liquid slurry that meets the standards set out in Table 1 of the Soil, Ground Water Sediment Standards referenced in O. Reg. 153/04, 4.5.20.4 Topsoil, sod and turf materials to be stockpiled for use as final cover only; 4.5.21 Ensure that such dust control measures are in place so as to restrict the blowing of dust onto any adjacent lands or highways; 4.5.22 Operate in compliance witoise by-law and any other relevant legislation; 4.5.23 Conditions to address the requirements of the Conservation Authority; 4.5.24 Conditions to address the requirements of any other required agency; and 4.5.25 An agreement, if required by Section 6 of this By-law. 4.6 The Director may issue a permit when: 4.6.1 The Director is satisfied that the lands which are the subject of the application for a permit are not within an area where placing or dumping of fill or other site alteration is prohibited under Section 2 of this By-law; 4.6.2 The applicant has fulfilled all requirements of Section 4 of this By-law; 4.6.3 If required by Section 6, the applicant has entered into the agreement referred to in Section 6 of this By-law; 4.6.4 In addition to compliance with all other requirements, the intended use for the filled area is TownshZoning By-law, and the applicable Conservation Authority; and 4.6.5 The amount of fill to be dumped or placed on any lot will not exceed one thousand (1000) cubic metres, in which case the approval of Council will be required. Page 10 of 17 Page 216 of 491 12.e) Report No. CS2016-010, Doug Irwin, Director, Corporate... 4.7 Where a permit has been issued under this By-law authorizing site alteration on lands, no person shall undertake or permit site alteration except in accordance with: 4.7.1 The plans, documents and any other information required for the issuance of a permit; 4.7.2 The terms and conditions of the permit; 4.7.3 Compliance with the agreement entered into with the Township as a condition of obtaining the permit; and 4.7.4 All other provisions of this By-law. 4.8 The Township may engage legal, engineering, hydrology, environmental. Arborist, landscape or any other consultant the Inspector deems necessary in order to evaluate studies and/or agreements or to provide assistance to the Inspector throughout the site alteration process in which case the cost incurred for such evaluation shall be charged back to the applicant plus a 5% administration charge. 4.9 The Township may draw on the security required pursuant to Section 4.2.7 in order to remedy any breach of the provisions of this By-law, the conditions imposed on the fill permit by the Inspector, or any other obligation of the owner relating to the fill permit, and without limiting the generality of the foregoing, such security may be used to return the land to a condition satisfactory to the Inspector and to pay any outstanding amounts owned pursuant to the Section 4.2.7 of this By-law. 4.10 The Inspector may require that additional security be provided by the owner at any time if, in the opinion of the Inspector, such additional security is required, and the owner shall provide such additional security immediately upon the request of the Inspector. 4.11 The issuance of any permit by the Inspector shall not relieve the permit holder from compliance with this By-law, any other applicable law or legislation. 5.0 Expiry, Renewal, Revocation and Transfer of Permit 5.1 Any permit issued pursuant to Section 4.23 of this By-law shall be valid for a period of one (1) year from the date of issuance but shall expire after six (6) months from the date of issuance if the work authorized thereunder has not been commenced by that date. 5.2 A permit which is no longer valid or which has expired pursuant to Section 5.1 may be renewed within a six (6) month period following the date of expiry upon written application to the Inspector accompanied by a payment of one half of the original permit fee, provided that the previously permitted work has not been revised. 5.3 No permit shall be extended past the completion date without the approval of Council and such extension shall be for a period not exceeding six (6) months from the date when the original permit was to be completed. 5.4 Where it is determined by an Inspector that a permit has been issued based on false or misleading information, the Inspector shall revoke the permit, and the owner and permit holder shall ensure that all work that was the subject of the revoked permit ceases and they shall return the land to a condition that is satisfactory to the Director. 5.5 If title to the land for which a permit has been issued is transferred while the permit remains in effect, the permit shall be cancelled unless the new owner, within thirty (30) days of the transfer: 5.5.1 Provides the Township with an undertaking agreeing to comply with all conditions under which the existing permit was issued; or Page 11 of 17 Page 217 of 491 12.e) Report No. CS2016-010, Doug Irwin, Director, Corporate... 5.5.2 Applies for and obtains a new permit in accordance with the provisions of this By-law. 5.6 When work has commenced before a permit for the work has been issued, the fees for an application for each permit required shall: 5.6.1 Double the amount otherwise specified in this By-law; and 5.6.2 Include an additional $250.00 for each inspection that was made, required or requested prior to the permit being issued. 5.7 An Inspector may revoke any permit issued pursuant to this By-law for the following reasons: 5.7.1 It was obtained on mistaken, false or incorrect information; 5.7.2 It was issued in error; 5.7.3 The owner or permit holder requests in writing, that it be revoked; 5.7.4 The terms of an agreement under this By-law have not been complied with; 5.7.5 Work authorized under the permit has not been commenced prior to its expiry date; 5.7.6 An owner has failed to comply with the provisions of this By-law; or 5.7.7 The land has been transferred and the new owner has not complied with the requirements of Section 5 of this By-law. 6.0 Permit Agreement 6.1 Where greater than one thousand (1000) cubic metres of fill is being placed or dumped or where the resulting proposed grade will be greater than two (2) metres above or below adjacent existing grade, the owner shall provide a complete application and enter into an agreement with the Township which shall be registered on title to the land on which the work is to be performed and such agreement shall include the following conditions: 6.1.1 To retain a Qualified Person approved by the Director who shall be responsible for ensuring that the site alteration is in accordance with reasonable engineering and environmental practices, and is in accordance with the plans submitted for the permit, and is in accordance with conditions imposed pursuant to Section 4.5 of this By- law; 6.1.2 To undertake the site alteration in accordance with Section 6.1.1; 6.1.3 To require the Qualified Person to report in writing on a regular basis or as determined by the Director that the site alteration is in accordance with Section 6.1.1; 6.1.4 To require that the site alteration be completed by a specified date as noted in the permit; 6.1.5 Not to contaminate the natural environment and to abide by all applicable environmental laws and regulations; 6.1.6 To provide a report from the Qualified Person referred to in Section 6.1.1 that he/she is satisfied that the site alteration will not result in: 6.1.6.1 Soil erosion, 6.1.6.2 Blockage of a watercourse, Page 12 of 17 Page 218 of 491 12.e) Report No. CS2016-010, Doug Irwin, Director, Corporate... 6.1.6.3 Siltation in a watercourse, 6.1.6.4 Pollution of a watercourse, 6.1.6.5 Flooding or ponding on abutting lands, 6.1.6.6 Flooding or ponding caused by a watercourse overflowing its banks, 6.1.6.7 A detrimental effect on any trees of a caliper of seventy-five (75) millimetres or more located on the lands, 6.1.6.8 Detrimental effect on matters of inherent biological sensitivity such as, but not limited to, aquifer recharge, water quality, unusual plants or wildlife and overwintering habitats, 6.1.6.9 Unauthorized injury or destruction of municipal trees or other trees protected under by-laws of the Township or the County, and 6.1.6.10 Injury or destruction of other trees, which in the opinion of the Inspector, could reasonably be avoided. 6.2 In addition, the agreement will contain an acknowledgment from the owner that the Township may engage legal, engineering, hydrology, environmental, arborist, landscape or any other consultant the Inspector deems necessary in order to evaluate studies and/or agreements or to provide assistance to the Inspector throughout the site alteration process in which case the costs incurred for such evaluations shall be charged back to the applicant plus a 5% administration charge; and 6.2.1 To provide security to be used to remedy any breach of the By-law or agreement, and 6.2.2 To indemnify the Township for any liability, costs, damages or losses incurred directly or indirectly caused by the issuing of a permit and to provide insurance satisfactory to the Township. 7.0 Consideration of Council 7.1 Where site alteration involves the placing or dumping of fill on a lot that exceeds one thousand (1000) cubic metres of fill or two (2) metres above or below the existing grade, the permit for such site alteration shall only be issued by Council, which shall have the same powers as the Inspector pursuant to this By-law. 8.0 Administration and Enforcement 8.1 The administration and enforcement of this By-law shall be performed by the Inspector and by such municipal law enforcement officers of the Townshipas may be appointed by Council. 8.3 Inspectors may, at any reasonable time enter and inspect any land, including soil testing and the taking of samples, to determine whether the provisions of this By-law, or a condition of a permit issued under this By-law have been complied with. This power of entry does not allow the Inspector to enter any building. 8.4 Upon completion of the work pursuant to the permit, the owner and/or permit holder shall so advise the Inspector. 8.5 No person shall obstruct an Inspector who is carrying out an inspection pursuant to this By-law. Page 13 of 17 Page 219 of 491 12.e) Report No. CS2016-010, Doug Irwin, Director, Corporate... 8.6 This By-law shall apply to all site alteration, including placing and dumping of fill, removal of topsoil, and the alteration of grade on all lands within the boundaries of the Township. 9.0 Appeals 9.1 There shall be and is hereby established a Site Alteration Appeals Committee consisting of three (3) members of Council, appointed by Council to hold office for a term not exceeding the term of the Council that appointed them. A simple majority of the members of the Site Alteration Appeals Committee constitutes a quorum for its meetings and business. 9.2 A person applying for a permit under this By-law may appeal to the Site Alteration Appeals Committee on one or more of the following grounds: 9.2.1 The completeness of an application submitted for a permit; 9.2.2 Failure to make a decision on an application for a permit within forty- five (45) days of the Township receiving a complete application, which appeal must be made within thirty (30) days after the expiration of the forty-five (45) day period; 9.2.3 Refusal to issue a permit, which appeal must be made within thirty (30) days after the permit refusal; and 9.2.4 A condition included in a permit, which appeal must be made within thirty (30) days after the permit was issued; 9.3 An applicant appealing to the Site Alteration Appeals Committee shallpay a fee in the amount of $250.00 upon filing the appeal for the processing of the appeal. 9.4 On an appeal under this section, the Site Alteration Appeals Committee shall have all of the powers of the Inspector pursuant to this By-law. 9.5 A decision of the Site Alteration Appeals Committee shall be final and binding on the person applying for the permit and no further appeal is available. 10.0 Orders 10.1 If after inspection, an Inspector is satisfied that a contravention of this By-law has occurred, the Inspector shall notify the registered owner of the land of the particulars with a Notice of Contravention and/or an Order to Comply pursuant to subsection 444(1) or subsection 445(1) of the Nvojdjqbm!Bdu-!3112, and at the same time provide all occupants with a copy of the notice and such order shall contain: 10.1.1 The municipal address and the legal description of the land; 10.1.2 Reasonable particulars of the contravention; and 10.1.3 The period of time within which there must be compliance. 10.2 The Inspector, by a written Notice of Contravention and/or an Order to Comply pursuant to subsections 444(1) and 445(1) of the Nvojdjqbm!Bdu-!3112, may require any person who has altered the grade of land, or who has caused or permitted the grade to be altered contrary to the provisions of this By-law, or who has placed or dumped fill, or has caused or permitted fill to be placed or dumped, or who has caused or permitted any form of site alteration contrary to the provisions of this By-law: 10.2.1To cease all work in respect of site alteration; 10.2.2 To remove the fill; 10.2.3 To fill in any excavations or ponds; and/or Page 14 of 17 Page 220 of 491 12.e) Report No. CS2016-010, Doug Irwin, Director, Corporate... 10.2.4 To do all work necessary: 10.2.4.1 To eliminate any hazards resulting from the alteration of the grade or the dumping or placing of fill and to restore the land to a condition of safety, 10.2.4.2 To preserve the land pending any hearing of an appeal in respect of an application, and 10.2.4.3 To restore the land to its former condition prior to the alteration of the grade of land to the placing or dumping of the fill on the land or other site alteration. 10.3 The Notice of Contravention and/or Order to Comply referred to in Sections 10.1 and 10.2 shall also contain: 10.3.1 The time frame in which the work contained in the Order to Comply must be carried out; and 10.3.2 A notice stating that if the work is not done in compliance with the Order to Comply within the period it specifies, the Township may have the work done at the expense of the owner. 10.4 An owner who has received a Notice of Contravention and/or an Order to Comply shall comply with the Notice of Contravention and/or the Order to Comply within the time frame specified in the Notice of Contravention or the Order to Comply, otherwise, the Inspector may draw on any security filed. 10.5 A Notice of Contravention or an Order to Comply shall be served personally or by prepaid registered mail or in accordance with Section 10.7. 10.6 A Notice of Contravention or an Order to Comply pursuant to this By-law sent by prepaid registered mail shall be sent to the last known address to the owner of the land and permit holder. 10.7 An Inspector who is unable to effect service pursuant to Section 10.5 of this By- law shall place a placard containing the terms of the Notice of Contravention or an Order to Comply in a conspicuous place on the property and the placing of the placard shall be deemed to be sufficient service of the Notice of Contravention or an Order to Comply on the owner and permit holder. 10.8 If the owner or permit holder fails to do the work required by the Order to Comply within the period it specifies, the Township, in addition to all other remedies it may have, may do the work and for this purpose may enter on the land with its employees and agents. The costs incurred by the Township in so doing shall be paid by the owner of the land and may be recovered by the Township in like manner as taxes or drawing any security filed. 11.0 Offences 11.1 Any person, other than a corporation, who contravenes the provisions of this By- law, the terms or conditions of a permit issued pursuant to this By-law, a Notice of Contravention or an Order to Comply issued pursuant to this By-law, or an agreement made pursuant to this By-law, is guilty of an offence and, upon conviction, is liable: 11.1.1 On a first conviction, to a fine of not more than $10,000.00, and 11.1.2 On any subsequent conviction to a fine of not more than $25,000.00. 11.2 A corporation that contravenes any provision of this By-law, the terms or conditions of a permit issued pursuant to this By-law, a Notice of Contravention an Order to Comply issued pursuant to this By-law, or an agreement made pursuant to this By-law, is guilty of an offence and on conviction is liable: Page 15 of 17 Page 221 of 491 12.e) Report No. CS2016-010, Doug Irwin, Director, Corporate... 11.2.1 On a first conviction, to a fine of not more than $50,000.00, and 11.2.2 On any subsequent conviction to a fine of not more than $100,000.00. 11.3 In addition to any fine or any other penalty, any person who is convicted of contravening a provision of this By-law, the terms and conditions of a permit issued pursuant to this By-law, a Notice of Contravention an Order to Comply issued pursuant to this By-law, or an agreement made pursuant to this By-law, may be ordered by a court of competent jurisdiction at the expense of the person to: 11.3.1 Rehabilitate the land, 11.3.2 Remove the fill placed or dumped, or 11.3.3 Restore the grade of the land to its original condition. 11.4 No person shall hinder or obstruct, or attempt to hinder or obstruct, any Inspector or municipal law enforcement officer exercising a power or performing a duty under this By-law. Any person who is alleged to have contravened any of the provisions of this by-law shall identify themselves to the Inspector or municipal law enforcement officer upon request. Failure to so shall be deemed to have obstructed or hindered the Inspector or municipal law enforcement officer in the execution of their duties. 12.0 Severability 12.1 If any provision of this By-law, or the application thereof to any person or circumstance, is invalid, the invalidity shall not affect other provisions or application of this By-law which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this By-law are severable. 13.0 Decision or Determination of Officials Under this By-law 13.1 Any decision or determination to be made by the Director or an Inspector (including a municipal law enforcement officer) is to be made at the Director or mination shall be final and binding. Page 16 of 17 Page 222 of 491 12.e) Report No. CS2016-010, Doug Irwin, Director, Corporate... To By-law No. 2016-056 For the Corporation of The Township of Oro-Medonte Fees Application Per Cubic Metres Fill less than 1000 cubic metres $500.00 $.50 Fill greater than 1000 cubic metres $750.00 $.50 Permit Extension Fill less than 1000 cubic metres $250.00 Fill greater than 1000 cubic metres $375.00 Securities Fill less than 1000 cubic metres $5000.00 Fill greater than 1000 cubic metres $.50 per cubic metre of fill 25894306.2 Page 17 of 17 Page 223 of 491 12.f) Report No. FD2016-04, Hugh Murray, Fire Chief re: Roge... Page 224 of 491 12.f) Report No. FD2016-04, Hugh Murray, Fire Chief re: Roge... Page 225 of 491 12.g) Report No. RC2016-07, Shawn Binns, Director, Recreatio... Page 226 of 491 12.g) Report No. RC2016-07, Shawn Binns, Director, Recreatio... Page 227 of 491 12.g) Report No. RC2016-07, Shawn Binns, Director, Recreatio... Page 228 of 491 12.g) Report No. RC2016-07, Shawn Binns, Director, Recreatio... Page 229 of 491 12.g) Report No. RC2016-07, Shawn Binns, Director, Recreatio... Page 230 of 491 12.h) Report No. CSI2016-11, Donna Hewitt, Director, Corpora... Page 231 of 491 12.h) Report No. CSI2016-11, Donna Hewitt, Director, Corpora... Page 232 of 491 12.i) Report No. CSI2016-17, Donna Hewitt, Director, Corpora... Page 233 of 491 12.i) Report No. CSI2016-17, Donna Hewitt, Director, Corpora... Page 234 of 491 12.i) Report No. CSI2016-17, Donna Hewitt, Director, Corpora... Page 235 of 491 12.i) Report No. CSI2016-17, Donna Hewitt, Director, Corpora... Page 236 of 491 12.i) Report No. CSI2016-17, Donna Hewitt, Director, Corpora... Page 237 of 491 12.i) Report No. CSI2016-17, Donna Hewitt, Director, Corpora... Page 238 of 491 12.i) Report No. CSI2016-17, Donna Hewitt, Director, Corpora... Page 239 of 491 12.i) Report No. CSI2016-17, Donna Hewitt, Director, Corpora... Page 240 of 491 12.i) Report No. CSI2016-17, Donna Hewitt, Director, Corpora... Page 241 of 491 12.i) Report No. CSI2016-17, Donna Hewitt, Director, Corpora... Page 242 of 491 12.i) Report No. CSI2016-17, Donna Hewitt, Director, Corpora... Page 243 of 491 12.i) Report No. CSI2016-17, Donna Hewitt, Director, Corpora... Page 244 of 491 12.i) Report No. CSI2016-17, Donna Hewitt, Director, Corpora... Page 245 of 491 12.i) Report No. CSI2016-17, Donna Hewitt, Director, Corpora... Page 246 of 491 12.i) Report No. CSI2016-17, Donna Hewitt, Director, Corpora... Page 247 of 491 12.i) Report No. CSI2016-17, Donna Hewitt, Director, Corpora... Page 248 of 491 12.i) Report No. CSI2016-17, Donna Hewitt, Director, Corpora... Page 249 of 491 12.i) Report No. CSI2016-17, Donna Hewitt, Director, Corpora... Page 250 of 491 12.i) Report No. CSI2016-17, Donna Hewitt, Director, Corpora... Page 251 of 491 12.i) Report No. CSI2016-17, Donna Hewitt, Director, Corpora... Page 252 of 491 12.i) Report No. CSI2016-17, Donna Hewitt, Director, Corpora... Page 253 of 491 12.i) Report No. CSI2016-17, Donna Hewitt, Director, Corpora... Page 254 of 491 12.i) Report No. CSI2016-17, Donna Hewitt, Director, Corpora... Page 255 of 491 12.i) Report No. CSI2016-17, Donna Hewitt, Director, Corpora... Page 256 of 491 12.i) Report No. CSI2016-17, Donna Hewitt, Director, Corpora... Page 257 of 491 12.i) Report No. CSI2016-17, Donna Hewitt, Director, Corpora... Page 258 of 491 12.i) Report No. CSI2016-17, Donna Hewitt, Director, Corpora... Page 259 of 491 12.i) Report No. CSI2016-17, Donna Hewitt, Director, Corpora... Page 260 of 491 12.i) Report No. CSI2016-17, Donna Hewitt, Director, Corpora... Page 261 of 491 12.i) Report No. CSI2016-17, Donna Hewitt, Director, Corpora... Page 262 of 491 12.i) Report No. CSI2016-17, Donna Hewitt, Director, Corpora... Page 263 of 491 12.i) Report No. CSI2016-17, Donna Hewitt, Director, Corpora... Page 264 of 491 12.i) Report No. CSI2016-17, Donna Hewitt, Director, Corpora... Page 265 of 491 12.i) Report No. CSI2016-17, Donna Hewitt, Director, Corpora... Page 266 of 491 12.i) Report No. CSI2016-17, Donna Hewitt, Director, Corpora... Page 267 of 491 12.i) Report No. CSI2016-17, Donna Hewitt, Director, Corpora... Page 268 of 491 12.i) Report No. CSI2016-17, Donna Hewitt, Director, Corpora... Page 269 of 491 12.i) Report No. CSI2016-17, Donna Hewitt, Director, Corpora... Page 270 of 491 12.i) Report No. CSI2016-17, Donna Hewitt, Director, Corpora... Page 271 of 491 12.i) Report No. CSI2016-17, Donna Hewitt, Director, Corpora... Page 272 of 491 12.i) Report No. CSI2016-17, Donna Hewitt, Director, Corpora... Page 273 of 491 12.i) Report No. CSI2016-17, Donna Hewitt, Director, Corpora... Page 274 of 491 12.i) Report No. CSI2016-17, Donna Hewitt, Director, Corpora... Page 275 of 491 12.i) Report No. CSI2016-17, Donna Hewitt, Director, Corpora... Page 276 of 491 12.i) Report No. CSI2016-17, Donna Hewitt, Director, Corpora... Page 277 of 491 12.i) Report No. CSI2016-17, Donna Hewitt, Director, Corpora... Page 278 of 491 12.j) Report No. CSI2016-18, Donna Hewitt, Director, Corpora... Page 279 of 491 12.j) Report No. CSI2016-18, Donna Hewitt, Director, Corpora... Page 280 of 491 12.j) Report No. CSI2016-18, Donna Hewitt, Director, Corpora... Page 281 of 491 12.k) Report No. TES2016-15, Jerry Ball, Director, Transport... Page 282 of 491 12.k) Report No. TES2016-15, Jerry Ball, Director, Transport... Page 283 of 491 12.k) Report No. TES2016-15, Jerry Ball, Director, Transport... Page 284 of 491 12.k) Report No. TES2016-15, Jerry Ball, Director, Transport... Page 285 of 491 12.k) Report No. TES2016-15, Jerry Ball, Director, Transport... Page 286 of 491 12.k) Report No. TES2016-15, Jerry Ball, Director, Transport... Page 287 of 491 12.k) Report No. TES2016-15, Jerry Ball, Director, Transport... Page 288 of 491 12.k) Report No. TES2016-15, Jerry Ball, Director, Transport... Page 289 of 491 12.k) Report No. TES2016-15, Jerry Ball, Director, Transport... Page 290 of 491 12.k) Report No. TES2016-15, Jerry Ball, Director, Transport... Page 291 of 491 12.k) Report No. TES2016-15, Jerry Ball, Director, Transport... Page 292 of 491 12.k) Report No. TES2016-15, Jerry Ball, Director, Transport... Page 293 of 491 12.k) Report No. TES2016-15, Jerry Ball, Director, Transport... Page 294 of 491 12.k) Report No. TES2016-15, Jerry Ball, Director, Transport... Page 295 of 491 12.k) Report No. TES2016-15, Jerry Ball, Director, Transport... Rethinking Page 296 of 491 12.k) Report No. TES2016-15, Jerry Ball, Director, Transport... Page 297 of 491 12.l) Report No. TES2016-16, Jerry Ball, Director, Transport... Page 298 of 491 12.l) Report No. TES2016-16, Jerry Ball, Director, Transport... Page 299 of 491 12.l) Report No. TES2016-16, Jerry Ball, Director, Transport... Page 300 of 491 12.m) Report No. TES2016-17, Jerry Ball, Director, Transport... Page 301 of 491 12.m) Report No. TES2016-17, Jerry Ball, Director, Transport... Page 302 of 491 12.m) Report No. TES2016-17, Jerry Ball, Director, Transport... Page 303 of 491 12.m) Report No. TES2016-17, Jerry Ball, Director, Transport... Page 304 of 491 12.m) Report No. TES2016-17, Jerry Ball, Director, Transport... Page 305 of 491 12.m) Report No. TES2016-17, Jerry Ball, Director, Transport... Page 306 of 491 12.m) Report No. TES2016-17, Jerry Ball, Director, Transport... Page 307 of 491 12.m) Report No. TES2016-17, Jerry Ball, Director, Transport... Page 308 of 491 12.m) Report No. TES2016-17, Jerry Ball, Director, Transport... Page 309 of 491 12.m) Report No. TES2016-17, Jerry Ball, Director, Transport... Page 310 of 491 12.m) Report No. TES2016-17, Jerry Ball, Director, Transport... Page 311 of 491 12.m) Report No. TES2016-17, Jerry Ball, Director, Transport... Page 312 of 491 12.m) Report No. TES2016-17, Jerry Ball, Director, Transport... Page 313 of 491 12.m) Report No. TES2016-17, Jerry Ball, Director, Transport... Page 314 of 491 12.m) Report No. TES2016-17, Jerry Ball, Director, Transport... Page 315 of 491 12.m) Report No. TES2016-17, Jerry Ball, Director, Transport... Page 316 of 491 12.m) Report No. TES2016-17, Jerry Ball, Director, Transport... Page 317 of 491 12.m) Report No. TES2016-17, Jerry Ball, Director, Transport... Page 318 of 491 12.m) Report No. TES2016-17, Jerry Ball, Director, Transport... Page 319 of 491 12.m) Report No. TES2016-17, Jerry Ball, Director, Transport... Page 320 of 491 12.m) Report No. TES2016-17, Jerry Ball, Director, Transport... Page 321 of 491 12.m) Report No. TES2016-17, Jerry Ball, Director, Transport... Page 322 of 491 12.m) Report No. TES2016-17, Jerry Ball, Director, Transport... Page 323 of 491 12.m) Report No. TES2016-17, Jerry Ball, Director, Transport... Page 324 of 491 12.m) Report No. TES2016-17, Jerry Ball, Director, Transport... Page 325 of 491 12.m) Report No. TES2016-17, Jerry Ball, Director, Transport... Page 326 of 491 12.m) Report No. TES2016-17, Jerry Ball, Director, Transport... Page 327 of 491 12.m) Report No. TES2016-17, Jerry Ball, Director, Transport... Page 328 of 491 12.m) Report No. TES2016-17, Jerry Ball, Director, Transport... Page 329 of 491 12.m) Report No. TES2016-17, Jerry Ball, Director, Transport... Page 330 of 491 12.m) Report No. TES2016-17, Jerry Ball, Director, Transport... Page 331 of 491 12.m) Report No. TES2016-17, Jerry Ball, Director, Transport... Page 332 of 491 12.m) Report No. TES2016-17, Jerry Ball, Director, Transport... Page 333 of 491 12.m) Report No. TES2016-17, Jerry Ball, Director, Transport... Page 334 of 491 12.m) Report No. TES2016-17, Jerry Ball, Director, Transport... Page 335 of 491 12.m) Report No. TES2016-17, Jerry Ball, Director, Transport... Page 336 of 491 12.m) Report No. TES2016-17, Jerry Ball, Director, Transport... Page 337 of 491 12.m) Report No. TES2016-17, Jerry Ball, Director, Transport... Page 338 of 491 12.n) Report No. TES2016-18, Jerry Ball, Director, Transport... Page 339 of 491 12.n) Report No. TES2016-18, Jerry Ball, Director, Transport... Page 340 of 491 12.n) Report No. TES2016-18, Jerry Ball, Director, Transport... Page 341 of 491 12.n) Report No. TES2016-18, Jerry Ball, Director, Transport... Page 342 of 491 12.n) Report No. TES2016-18, Jerry Ball, Director, Transport... Page 343 of 491 12.o) Jerry Ball, Director, Transportation & Environmental S... Page 344 of 491 12.o) Jerry Ball, Director, Transportation & Environmental S... Page 345 of 491 12.o) Jerry Ball, Director, Transportation & Environmental S... Page 346 of 491 12.p) Doug Irwin, Director, Corporate Services/Clerk re: Res... Page 347 of 491 14.a) Announcements of Interest to the Public: Township of O... Township of Oro-Medonte NOTICE OF CLOSURE Gore Road Replacement of Bridge No. 13 Contract No.: 300037030 The Township of Oro-Medontehereby notifies and advises all local residentsand affected partiesof the scheduled Oro-MedonteBridgeNo.13 Replacement and subsequent Closure of GoreRoad between PenetanguisheneRoad and 1LineSouth, in the TownshipofOro-Medonte and CountyofSimcoe. Oro-MedonteBridgeNo.13islocated on GoreRoad over the WillowCreek, roughly halfway betweenPenetanguishineRoadand 1LineSouth.This section of GoreRoad will be: th Closed for Bridge Replacement,beginning Tuesday, February 16,2016, and is scheduled to reopenno later than: th August 15,2016. Local access will be maintained throughout the duration of the Bridge Replacement Works,via PenetanguisheneRoad to the west of the crossing, and 1LineSouth to the east. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause local residents for the duration of the Bridge Replacement Works. Should you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. OwnerContract Administrator Township of Oro-MedonteR.J. Burnside & Associates Limited Ms. Michelle Jakobi,Operations TechnologistMr. Matthew Brooks, P.Eng. Transportation ServicesContract Administrator 148 Line 7 South3 Ronell Crescent Oro-Medonte ON L0L 2E0CollingwoodON L9Y4J6 Telephone:705-487-2171Telephone:705-797-4284 Email:mjakobi@oro-medonte.caEmail:matt.brooks@rjburnside.com Page 348 of 491 14.a) Announcements of Interest to the Public: Township of O... Page 349 of 491 14.a) Announcements of Interest to the Public: Township of O... Canada Day Office Closure Page 350 of 491 14.a) Announcements of Interest to the Public: Township of O... Page 351 of 491 14.b) Correspondence dated June 3, 2016 from Gayle Wood, CAO... Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority June 3, 2016 Doug Irwin, Clerk The Township of Oro-Medonte 148 Line 7 South Oro, Ontario L0L 2X0 DearMr. Irwin Re: NVCA Phragmites and Invasive Species Action Plan The NVCA Board of Directors have expressed concern regarding Phragmities and other invasive species within the Nottawasaga River watershed. The Board requested staff to prepare an Action Planin this regards. I am pleased to advise that on May 27, 2016 NVCAs Dave Featherstone, Manager, Watershed Monitoring presented a Phragmites and Invasive Species Action Plan to the Board of Directors. At that meeting the following resolution was carried: RESOLVED THAT: the Board of Directors approve Staff Report No. 21-05-16-BOD Regarding the NVCAs Phragmities and Invasive Species Action Plan; and FURTHER THAT: the Action Plan be circulated to watershed municipalities for their information. Attached you will find a copyofthe approved plan. If you have any questions please feel free to contact myself at gwood@nvca.on.caor Dave Featherstone at dfeatehrstone@nvc.aon.ca Sincerely, D. Gayle Wood Chief Administrative Officer Copy: NVCA Municipal Board Member, Councillor Phil Hall Attachment: NVCA Phragmites and Invasive Species Action Plan Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority th 8195 8Line, Utopia, ON L0M 1T0 T: 705-424-1479F: 705-424-2115 B!nfncfs!pg!Dpotfswbujpo!Poubsjp Page 352 of 491 14.b) Correspondence dated June 3, 2016 from Gayle Wood, CAO... Phragmites & Invasive Species Action Plan for the Nottawasaga Valley Watershed Prepared by the Watershed Monitoring Team Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority May 2016 Phragmites Action Plan Page 353 of 491 14.b) Correspondence dated June 3, 2016 from Gayle Wood, CAO... Executive Summary Invasive species continue to represent a challenge within the Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority (NVCA) watershed. The NVCA Board of Directors have recently expressed concern regarding Phragmites australis (Phragmites) and have requested an Action Plan be prepared by NVCA staff to outlines issues and actions to address this invasive species. Correspondence from Clearview Township noted concerns with Phragmites and also with Asian Carp. Based on this additional concern and NVCA involvement with other invasive species in the watershed, this Action Plan focuses on Phragmites but also on other invasive species that threaten the watershed. NVCA staff note that no one agency or group can be effective alone in addressing invasive species and that broad partnerships are required to address invasive species at a local, regional, provincial and national level. Phragmites (also known as European Common Reed) is a perennial grass native to Eurasia that is now spreading rapidly throughout Ontario. It is commonly found along wetland and shoreline edges as well as in roadside ditches. Phragmites stands develop and expand quickly through seed dispersal and underground roots. Dispersal to new locations occurs as a result of environmental factors such as water, air, or animal movement, as well as human vectors including horticultural trade, recreational use (hiking, boats ATVs), development and road maintenance. Phragmites has a number of adverse effects on the environment, economy and society. These include loss of biodiversity and species richness, loss of habitat, agriculture impacts, negative impacts on property values, and impacts to recreational activities and tourism. Responsibilities for invasive species management is multi-jurisdictional with roles for federal, provincial, County and local municipal government agencies. Non-profit organizations and private landowners also have important roles to play. Controlling invasive species (including Phragmites) generally requires the concerted, coordinated effort of multiple agencies and community groups. Control methods for Phragmites include herbicide application as well as mechanical control through excavation, mowing/rolling, hand cutting, flooding, prescribed burning, mechanical excavation and tarping. Control strategies utilizing a combination of these methods can be developed with consideration for stand size, density, proximity to water and proximity to sensitive or desirable habitat/wildlife. The NVCA can work with municipalities and other agencies/interest groups to choose the best method for removal at a specific site. NVCA has a strong presence in Phragmites monitoring and management in our watershed. NVCA staff have assisted Wasaga Beach Provincial Park with Phragmites management along the beach shoreline and continue to monitor and control non-native Phragmites in the internationally significant Minesing Wetlands. Most recently, we have partnered with Georgian Bay Forever, Blue Mountain Watershed Trust, the Town of Collingwood and several condominium associations to monitor and control Phragmites along the Collingwood shoreline. We have also advocated to the provincial government to fast-track an approved over-water herbicide for use in combatting Phragmites. Phragmites Action Plan Page 354 of 491 14.b) Correspondence dated June 3, 2016 from Gayle Wood, CAO... NVCA staff also monitor and control garlic mustard and giant hogweed with partner agencies and groups in selected portions of the watershed. The NVCA website has a section devoted to invasive species information and invasive species and associated threats were highlighted in the recent Town of Collingwood Natural Heritage System study. Further to our continuing work on invasive species issues, NVCA staff propose an Invasive Species Action Plan in partnership with its member municipalities, community groups, residents and other agencies. This Action Plan consists of the following components: providing invasive species identification and monitoring services in the watershed (as resources allow) development of education and outreach material regarding invasive species including Phragmites hosting a workshop to inform all watershed partners about invasive plant issues, invasive plant identification and best management practices for control Providing coordination and logistical support, as capacity allows, for invasive species monitoring and control in the watershed applying for project grants and participating in invasive species-related projects when the opportunities arise providing support for municipalities in efforts to implement non-regulatory and regulatory strategies (by-laws) that will aid in the outreach, education and enforcement to assist with control of invasive species in the watershed continuing to monitor a range of aquatic and terrestrial invasive species issues with watershed partners and to provide vigilance/early warning for emerging invasive species issues: early detection and control is key to stopping new invasions. Phragmites Action Plan Page 355 of 491 14.b) Correspondence dated June 3, 2016 from Gayle Wood, CAO... Table of Contents 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 1 2 Understanding Phragmites .................................................................................... 1 2.1 How did Phragmites get here? ......................................................................... 1 2.2 What does Phragmites look like? ...................................................................... 1 2.3 How does Phragmites spread? ......................................................................... 2 2.4 Where is Phragmites found? ............................................................................ 3 2.5 Why is Phragmites a problem? ......................................................................... 4 3 Who is responsible for Phragmites and Invasive Species Management? ....................... 5 3.1 Federal Government ....................................................................................... 6 3.1.1 Plant Protection Act S.C 1990, c.22 ............................................................ 6 3.1.2 Seeds Act R.S.C. 1985, c. S-8 ................................................................... 7 3.1.3 Pest Control Products Act (S.C. 2002, c.28) ................................................ 7 3.1.4 Fisheries Act R.S.C. 1985, c.F-14 ............................................................... 7 3.2 Provincial Government .................................................................................... 7 3.2.1 Weed Control Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. W.5 ....................................................... 8 3.2.2 Pesticides Act, Ontario Regulation 63/09 ..................................................... 8 3.2.3 Public Lands Act. Ontario Legislation 239/13 (section 9) ............................... 9 3.2.4 Invasive Species Act ................................................................................ 9 3.3 Municipal ...................................................................................................... 9 3.3.1 Weed Control Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. W.5 ....................................................... 9 3.4 Non-Profit Organizations ............................................................................... 10 4 Best Management Practice for Control .................................................................. 10 4.1 Control Options............................................................................................ 10 4.1.1 Mowing/Hand-Cutting ............................................................................. 10 4.1.2 Compression or Rolling ........................................................................... 11 4.1.3 Burning ................................................................................................ 11 4.1.4 Herbicide Application .............................................................................. 11 4.1.5 Flooding ............................................................................................... 11 4.1.6 Hand-pulling or Mechanical Excavation ..................................................... 11 4.1.7 Tarping ................................................................................................. 11 4.2 Timing and other considerations .................................................................... 12 4.3 Recommended Control Treatments ................................................................. 14 Phragmites Action Plan Page 356 of 491 14.b) Correspondence dated June 3, 2016 from Gayle Wood, CAO... 4.4 Disposal ...................................................................................................... 14 5 What is the NVCA doing about Phragmites? ........................................................... 15 5.1 Wasaga Beach Provincial Park ....................................................................... 15 5.2 Minesing Wetlands ....................................................................................... 16 5.3 West Collingwood Shoreline .......................................................................... 17 5.4 Invasive Species Community Outreach Liaison Student ..................................... 18 5.5 Advocacy for Provincial Action ....................................................................... 18 6 What are other agencies doing about Phragmites in NVCA jurisdiction and beyond?.... 19 6.1 Blue Mountain Watershed Trust ..................................................................... 19 6.2 Georgian Bay Forever (GBF) .......................................................................... 19 6.3 Town of Collingwood .................................................................................... 19 6.4 Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) ............................................ 19 6.5 South Simcoe Streams Network (SSSN) ......................................................... 20 6.6 Ministry of Transportation ............................................................................. 20 6.7 Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry .......................................... 20 6.8 Conservation Ontario .................................................................................... 21 6.9 Ontario Invasive Plant Council ....................................................................... 21 7 Phragmites Action Plan and Recommendations ...................................................... 21 7.1 Continue Identifying and Monitoring Invasive Species ....................................... 22 7.2 Outreach and Education ................................................................................ 22 7.3 Invasive Phragmites Workshop ...................................................................... 22 7.4 Provide Technical Advice ............................................................................... 23 7.5 Facilitate Partnerships .................................................................................. 23 7.6 Provide Support to Partners .......................................................................... 23 7.7 Apply for Project Grants ................................................................................ 23 7.8 Participate in Invasive Species related projects ................................................ 23 7.9 Support Municipalities with regulation, by-laws and non-regulatory strategies ..... 24 7.9.1 Recommendations for Non-regulatory Strategies ....................................... 24 7.9.2 Recommendations for Regulatory Strategies ............................................. 24 7.9.3 Municipal by-laws under the Weed Control Act ........................................... 24 7.9.4 Other by-laws ........................................................................................ 25 8 Invasive Species the Dirty Dozen ...................................................................... 25 8.1 Giant Hogweed (Heracleum mantegazzianum) ................................................. 25 8.2 Dog Strangling Vine (Vincetoxicum rossicum) .................................................. 25 Phragmites Action Plan Page 357 of 491 14.b) Correspondence dated June 3, 2016 from Gayle Wood, CAO... 8.3 Himalayan Balsam (Impatiens glandulifera) ..................................................... 25 8.4 Garlic Mustard (Alliaria petiolate) ................................................................... 26 8.5 Wild Parsnip (Pastinaca sativa) ...................................................................... 26 8.6 Rough Manna Grass (Glyceria maxima) .......................................................... 26 8.7 Japanese Knotweed (Fallopia japonica) ........................................................... 26 8.8 Emerald Ash Borer (Argrilus planipennis) ........................................................ 27 8.9 Common Buckthorn (Rhamnus cathartica) ...................................................... 27 8.10 Round Goby (Neogobius melanostomus) ...................................................... 27 8.11 Rusty Crayfish (Orconectes rusticus) ........................................................... 27 8.12 Zebra/Quagga Mussel (Dreissena polymorpha & D. bugensis) ......................... 27 9 Emerging Invasive Species Concerns .................................................................... 28 9.1 Hemlock Woolly Adelgid (Adelges tsugae) ....................................................... 28 9.2 Asian Long-Horned Beetle (Anoplophora glabripennis) ...................................... 28 9.3 Asian carp (Hypophthalmichthys spp., Ctenopharyngodon idella and Mylopharyngodon piceus) ....................................................................................... 29 9.4 Chinese Silver Grass (Miscanthus sinensis & M. sacchariflorus) .......................... 29 10 Conclusion ..................................................................................................... 30 11 References ..................................................................................................... 31 1 Appendix A ........................................................................................................ 33 2 Appendix B ........................................................................................................ 42 3 Appendix C ........................................................................................................ 46 Table of Figures Figure 1 Phragmites australis ssp. australis ................................................................... 2 Figure 2. Documented Phragmites occurrences in Ontario. .............................................. 4 Figure 3 Phragmites Occurrences along the Wasaga Beach shoreline .............................. 16 Figure 4 Phragmites Occurrences in the Minesing Wetlands ........................................... 17 Figure 5 Phragmites stands along the West Collingwood Shoreline ................................. 18 Phragmites Action Plan Page 358 of 491 14.b) Correspondence dated June 3, 2016 from Gayle Wood, CAO... 1Introduction Invasive species are a global issue. Eurasian flora and fauna continue to plague North America while North American species pose a threat to Eurasian ecosystems and economies. Some of these species have become naturalized and are seen as natural parts of our ecosystems while new species appear foreign and appear to dominate our ecosystems almost overnight. Species such as European Common Reed (Phragmites) are impacting our shorelines and wetlands while others such as Asian Carp and Asian Long-horned Beetle are knocking at our watershed doors. The Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority (NVCA) Board identified Phragmites as a significant watershed issue at a 2016 board meeting. Clearview Township identified Phragmites and Asian carp as significant issues in recent correspondence to NVCA. This report focuses on Phragmites ecology and management but also addresses other current and potential invasive species issues. An Action Plan is recommended to work with our watershed partners and champions to address invasive species within the watershed. Above all else is a recognition that no one agency or group can be effective alone in addressing invasive species and that broad partnerships are required to address invasive species at a local, region, provincial and national level. 2Understanding Phragmites 2.1How did Phragmites get here? Phragmites australis ssp. australis or European Common Reed (hereinafter referred to as Phragmites) is a perennial grass native to Eurasia that is now spreading rapidly throughout Ontario (OFAH, 2015). Although it is unknown how Phragmites established in Canada, research suspects it likely was transported in ballast waters between 1700 and 1800 (OFAH, 2015). It was also introduced through the horticultural trade and is still currently being sold at garden centres despite its invasive behaviour. The plant was first recorded in southwestern Nova Scotia in 1910 and spread to Quebec via the St. Lawrence River (OPIC, 2016). It was first recorded in southwestern Ontario in 1948 (OPIC, 2016). griculture and Agri-food Canada (OPIC, 2016). 2.2What does Phragmites look like? Key features for identifying Phragmites include: height (up to 5 metres), dense stands (200 stems per square metre) and large seed heads which are brownish red in colour (Swearingen and Saltonstall, 2010). Other features to look for when identifying invasive Phragmites are the tan/beige stems, blue-green coloured leaves and rigid stem (culm) with tightly clinging leaf sheaths (Swearingen and Saltonstall, 2010). Phragmites and Invasive Species Action Plan 1 Page 359 of 491 14.b) Correspondence dated June 3, 2016 from Gayle Wood, CAO... Figure 1 Phragmites australis ssp. australis photo by NVCA Invasive Phragmites is not to be confused with its native counterpart, Phragmites australis ssp. Americanus. Native Phragmites should not be controlled as it does not form dense monocultures, alter habitat, negatively affect biodiversity or deter wildlife (OMNR, 2011). In the NVCA watershed, native Phragmites is relatively rare and often found in fen habitats such as those in the Minesing Wetlands. Some key features that distinguish native Phragmites are its yellow-green leaf colour, small and sparse seed head and height (no taller than 2 meters), red stems and earlier-flowering, less dense seed heads (OMNR, 2011). Proper identification of the plant is necessary to ensure that stands are non-native and subject to control measures. NVCA staff are qualified to determine whether stands are native or non-native and can assist member municipalities and watershed groups/residents with identification. 2.3How does Phragmites spread? Phragmites stands develop and expand quickly through seed dispersal, underground roots Stolons can grow outward several meters each year, allowing established stands to quickly increase in area (OMNR, 2011) and expand into adjacent habitats. Dispersal to new locations occurs as a result of environmental factors such as water, air, or animal movement, as well as human activities including the horticultural trade, recreational use, development, and road construction/maintenance (OMNR, 2011). Wind can disperse seeds up to 10 kilometers Phragmites and Invasive Species Action Plan 2 Page 360 of 491 14.b) Correspondence dated June 3, 2016 from Gayle Wood, CAO... from the parent plant (OPIC, 2016). Once Phragmites is established along waterways it is extremely difficult to control because new stands can be established from a single plant fragment or seed being washed downstream or to a new location (OMNR, 2011). Herbicide laws surrounding prohibition of application over water make it hard to control established stands in these habitats. Recreational trails create corridors that facilitate the spread of invasive species as seeds can attach themselves to c Disturbance caused by frequent trail use can promote the establishment of invasive species, which prefer disturbed areas for colonization (Halloran et al., 2013). Roadway construction and maintenance can facilitate the spread of seeds and plant fragments along road networks. Equipment such as excavators and dump trucks can spread seeds and plant fragments in their tires and treads. Studies have found that most seeds can remain attached to a vehicle under dry conditions for up to 257 km (Halloran et al., 2013). All-terrain vehicles, four-wheel drive trucks and water trucks may also facilitate the spread of invasive species if they are not cleaned properly. Transport of soils contaminated with plant fragments and seeds can also facilitate spread of Phragmites. Proper equipment cleaning and sediment disposal procedures are essential in order to control the spread of Phragmites 2.4Where is Phragmites found? Phragmites typically prefers wetland edges and shorelines, but it occasionally can be found in dry uplands next to these areas. It commonly thrives in roadside ditches. Phragmites is now established in almost every Lake Erie and Lake Huron wetland (OIPC, 2016). Phragmites is not limited to wet areas however, as it has specialized roots that can grow to extreme lengths and reach the groundwater below (OMNR, 2011). It thrives in disturbed areas and it is typically among the first species to colonize an area (OMNR, 2011). Phragmites also thrives in road side ditches, which seem to be a vector for the spread across Ontario (OFAH, 2015). Phragmites is seemingly unaffected by salt as it tolerates brackish habitats (salt was freshwater mix) and roadside ditches along major roadways such as the 400 series highways (OIPC, 2016). Phragmites occurrences occur throughout North America, including 48 states and every province in Canada (OIPC, 2016). In Southern Ontario, Phragmites is spreading rapidly and can be found as far north as Hearst and Kenora. There appears to be a strong correlation between road corridors and Phragmites occurrences, as seen in Figure 2. Phragmites and Invasive Species Action Plan 3 Page 361 of 491 14.b) Correspondence dated June 3, 2016 from Gayle Wood, CAO... Figure 2. Documented Phragmites occurrences in Ontario. Map by: EDDMapS Ontario (OPIC, 2016). 2.5Why is Phragmites a problem? Phragmites has a number of adverse effects on the environment, as well as economic and social impacts. Dense stands can cause a loss of biodiversity and species richness, loss of habitat, effect agriculture and cropland, affect property values, and impede recreational activities and tourism. Phragmites infestations degrade natural areas and can result in loss of wildlife habitat and biodiversity, including impacts to Species at Risk (OMNR, 2011). It is theorized that Phragmites contributes to 25% of species at risk in Ontario (OPIC, 2016). Phragmites directly attacks surrounding vegetation by secreting toxins from its roots into the soil, preventing growth of native species and allowing the formation of dense stands (OFAH, 2015). Dense stands can block sunlight to other plants and impede wildlife movement (OIPC, 2016). Phragmites has a high metabolic rate, leading to higher transpiration rates which can alter local wetland hydrology (OMNR, 2011). These habitats are critical to many species of amphibians and reptiles. In addition to environmental factors, there are also economic factors associated with Phragmites infestations. Phragmites stands along roadside ditches pose safety concerns for traffic due to reduced sightlines (MTO, 2015). Dead biomass from the plant can obstruct drainage which can cause poor drainage and flooding which can interfere with agricultural practices, roadbed drainage and interfere with stormwater management pond function (MTO, 2015). Phragmites rhizomes are known to be persistent enough to grow through road infrastructure including asphalt, granular and geosynthetic materials (MTO, 2015). These roadside infestations can also interfere with agriculture as growing stands can encroach on farm fields, resulting in loss of viable land (Sherman, 2015). Phragmites stands may be hosts for new crop diseases and/or pests (Sherman, 2015). The annual Phragmites and Invasive Species Action Plan 4 Page 362 of 491 14.b) Correspondence dated June 3, 2016 from Gayle Wood, CAO... economic impact of invasive plant on the Agriculture industry in Canada is estimated at $2.2 billion (Environmental Canada, 2010). Phragmites can affect property values, especially waterfront properties. It poses threats to recreation and tourism, as monoculture stands can raise aesthetic concerns and block waterways used for boating and angling. Once established in an area, Phragmites can extremely difficult to eradicate due to its persistent nature and affinity to establish in and around water which limits tools available for control. It is estimated that the control of Phragmites control projects can cost upwards of $865-$1,112 per hectare (OIPC, 2016). Municipal control attempts of municipal drains in Kingsville, Ontario estimate costs at approximately Vegh, 2016). 3Who is responsible for Phragmites and Invasive Species Management? Invasive species management is the responsibility of all from the federal government level to the private landowner. The table below outlines the agencies/groups involved in invasive species management, their responsibilities, and associated legislation, regulations and by- laws that guide their management activities. Government Agencies Involved Responsibilities Regulations/By-law Federal Parks Canada, Environment -provide framework for Plant Protection Act, Canada, Canadian Food preventing new 1990 Inspection Agency (CFIA), invasions, detecting Seeds Act, 1985 Pest Management Regulatory and responding to new Pest Control Products Agency (PMRA), Fisheries invasive species and Act, 2002. and Oceans Canada managing established Fisheries Act, 1985 species -implement legislation to restrict movement of invasive species Provincial Ministry of Natural Resources -provide strategic Weed Control Act, and Forestry, Ministry of the planning in dealing 1990. Environment and Climate with invasive species Pesticides Act Change, Ministry of -develop documents Public Lands Act Transportation, Ministry of around outreach and Agriculture, Food and Rural education, monitoring Affairs and research, control and management of invasive species -manage and assist with development of policies and regulations Local Municipalities, Regional -Managing street Weed Control Act Municipality trees, municipally Other creation of designated forest and regulations and by- woodlands, public laws pertaining to Phragmites and Invasive Species Action Plan 5 Page 363 of 491 14.b) Correspondence dated June 3, 2016 from Gayle Wood, CAO... parks and other invasive plant municipal natural management areas -develop and implement regulations and by-laws -employ by-law officers to implement by-laws, rules, laws, codes or regulations Non-profit Conservational Authorities, -no law binding -must obey Organizations Community Groups, responsibilities regulations and by- Stewardship Groups, Trail -manage invasive laws pertaining to Councils, Ontario Invasive species on regulated invasive species Plant Council, Invading areas within their management Species Awareness Program jurisdiction -provide leadership expertise through education and awareness Private -control activities - must obey Landowners conducted on their regulations and by- land and who is laws pertaining to allowed to enter or use invasive species the property management 3.1Federal Government The federal government provides a framework for preventing new invasions, detecting and responding to new invasive species and managing established species. They have also implemented legislation to restrict movement of invasive species. This legislation includes: 3.1.1Plant Protection Act S.C 1990, c.22 The Plant Protect Act is an act in place to prevent the importation, exportation and spread of pests injurious to plants and to provide their control and eradication in Canada. The Plant Protection Act is administered by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA). With this legislation the CFIA: Regulates the import, sale and movement of plants into, and within, Canada; Monitors imports to prevent entry of invasive plants; and Conducts surveillance to determine if an invasive plant is here, or to confirm that an area is free of a specific invasive plant. The invasive plants regulated under the Plant Protection Act are listed in the Pests Regulated by Canada. Species such as Emerald Ash Borer, Hemlock Woolly Adelgid, Common Buckthorn and Kudzu are all examples of pests regulated by Canada. Phragmites is not on the list of pests regulated by Canada. A full list of the regulated pests is available at: http://www.inspection.gc.ca/plants/plant-pests-invasive-species/pests/regulated- pests/eng/1363317115207/1363317187811 Phragmites and Invasive Species Action Plan 6 Page 364 of 491 14.b) Correspondence dated June 3, 2016 from Gayle Wood, CAO... 3.1.2Seeds Act R.S.C. 1985, c. S-8 The Seeds Act ensures that seeds sold in, imported into and exported from Canada meet established standards for quality labelling, and registration prior to sale in Canada. The Seeds Act is also administered by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency. The CFIA's Seed Program includes regulations restricting the presence of weed species in seed in an effort to prevent the introduction and spread of new weeds in Canada through seeds. Some weed species can invade agricultural and natural areas, causing serious damage to our economy and environment. This legislation does not deal specifically with Phragmites, but does deal with species such as Kudzo and Giant Hogweed. 3.1.3Pest Control Products Act (S.C. 2002, c.28) The updated Pest Control Products Act provides legislation that improves the pesticides regulatory system by increasing transparency and strengthening health and environmental protection and post-registration control of pesticides. The act ensures that only pesticides that make a useful contribution to pest management are registered and by expediting the registration of lower-risk products in order to protect the environmental and human health. It is this act that demands approvals for products before they can be imported, manufactured, or sold for use in Ontario. This regulates what pesticides and herbicides we can use to control invasive species such as Phragmites. 3.1.4Fisheries Act R.S.C. 1985, c.F-14 The Fisheries Act is in place to provide for the sustainability and ongoing productivity of commercial, recreational and Aboriginal fisheries. The regulation that deals specifically with invasive species is the Aquatic Invasive Species Regulations. Aquatic invasive species (AISs) are aquatic organisms that, upon introduction to areas or waters where they do not originate naturally, could have harmful effects on fish or fish habitat in Canada or the use of fish by Canadians. AISs have the potential to thrive in the absence of predators and to radically alter host habitat, rendering it inhospitable for indigenous species. AISs can significantly affect local fisheries; reduce biodiversity; cause reductions in, or extinction, of populations of indigenous fish; degrade water and habitats; alter infrastructure; introduce disease; and reduce recreational opportunities. These regulations do not pertain to Phragmites, but do apply to other organisms that are threatening our area such as Asian carps and Zebra/Quagga Mussels. Phragmites does not appear to be addressed Species. 3.2Provincial Government The provincial government is responsible for providing strategic planning in dealing with invasive species. They have and continue to develop documents around outreach and education, monitoring and research, control and management of invasive species. They Phragmites and Invasive Species Action Plan 7 Page 365 of 491 14.b) Correspondence dated June 3, 2016 from Gayle Wood, CAO... manage and assist with development of policies and regulations and implement these as necessary. These regulations and legislation includes: 3.2.1Weed Control Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. W.5 The intent of the Weed Control Act is to reduce the negative impacts of noxious weeds on agriculture and horticulture. The idea being, if we reduce hosts for the plant diseases, we can reduce health hazards and impact of noxious weeds on these sectors. Noxious weeds are designated under the Weed Control Act based on the following characteristics: Difficult to manage on agricultural land once established and will reduce yield and quality of crop being grown Negatively affects the health and well-being of livestock Poses a risk to health and well-being of livestock There are currently 25 weeds designated as noxious under the act. Municipalities are responsible for designating additional plants through a by-law made in accordance with the Weed Control Act. This act is not enforceable on federal land. Phragmites is not currently listed as a noxious weed. Groups such as the Ontario Phragmites Working Group, The Tiny Cottager (Federation of Tiny Township Shoreline Associations) and members of provincial parliament have spoken out to the provincial government to add Phragmites to the noxious weed list. This would allow municipalities to enforce Phragmites management without creating a new by-law. The NVCA contacted the Ontario Invasive Plant Council (OIPC) to inquire about why Phragmites was not yet added to the Noxious Weed List. OIPC staff noted that ideally there would be approvals for an over-water herbicide before Phragmites is added to the Noxious Weed List. For more information on the efforts that the MNRF is making on this process see section 6, subsection 6.7. 3.2.2Pesticides Act, Ontario Regulation 63/09 In 2009, the Ontario Cosmetic Pesticides Ban took effect under the Pesticides Act. The new regulations banned the use of certain pesticides for cosmetic purposes in, on or over land. Class 9 pesticides are the pesticides that deal directly with invasive species and must be used in accordance with the integrated pest management (IMP) principles set out by the province. IMP the need to prevent pests from establishing and considers all other options before deciding the most effective, environmentally friendly and cost effect means of managing a problem. Glyphosate (Class 9) is the active ingredient in a wide variety if herbicides (Roundup) and is one of the recommended herbicides for Phragmites control. Glyphosate is one of 82 active ingredients that were restricted with the Ontario Cosmetic Pesticides Ban. Products containing this active ingredient are banned for in, on and over land use, but there are some exceptions. Some exceptions include uses related to: Phragmites and Invasive Species Action Plan 8 Page 366 of 491 14.b) Correspondence dated June 3, 2016 from Gayle Wood, CAO... Golf courses (if prescribed conditions have been met) Agriculture Forestry Promotion of public health and safety Other prescribed uses (if prescribed conditions have been met) A natural resources exception can be given to manage, protect, establish or restore a natural area. A written opinion from the Ministry of Natural Resources may be given in the following circumstances: To control an invasive species that may be detrimental to the health of a person, environment or the economy of Ontario. To benefit a species of plant or animal native to Ontario To protect or restore a rare ecosystem or its components More information on the Pesticides Act and Regulation 63/09 can be found at www.ontario.ca/pesticideban. 3.2.3Public Lands Act. Ontario Legislation 239/13 (section 9) The Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry manages Crown Land (public land, forests and shore lands). Under the act, a shoreline property owner is not required to obtain a work permit to remove, by mechanical means or by hand, invasive aquatic plants from the bed of a waterbody in front of the property. This does not apply to federal land and waterbodies (eg. The Trent-Severn and Rideau Canal waterways). 3.2.4Invasive Species Act The Invasive Species Act is an Ontario legislation that supports the prevention, early detection, rapid response and eradication of invasive species. The major highlights of the Act are that it will: Give Ontario the tools to ban activities such as possessing and transporting certain invasive species Allow the government to enable early detection and rapid response action, for example prohibiting movement of contaminated firewood. Help promote compliance through inspection and enforcement measures The Act received Royal Assent after its third reading in October, 2015. The government is now creating regulations that will make this law come into force. The Act will come into effect within a year receiving royal assent. The NVCA is hopeful that this new legislation will give watershed partners the resources, training, tools to be successful in the fight against invasive species and Phragmites in particular. 3.3Municipal 3.3.1Weed Control Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. W.5 Municipalities have the authority to enforce and create by-laws in accordance with the Weed Control Act, which regulates the noxious weed list. In addition to the 25 weeds currently on Phragmites and Invasive Species Action Plan 9 Page 367 of 491 14.b) Correspondence dated June 3, 2016 from Gayle Wood, CAO... the list, municipalities can add additional noxious weeds at their discretion. Weed inspectors appointed by the municipality are responsible for responding to calls in regards to remove the plant within 7 days, if they fail to do so, the municipality can remove the plant and send a bill to the landowner. 3.4Non-Profit Organizations Non-Government Organizations such as conservation authorities, trail councils, Ontario Invasive Plant Council, community groups and stewardship groups have no law binding responsibilities in regards to invasive species. Many of these groups manage invasive species in regulated areas within their jurisdiction and provide leadership expertise through education and awareness. 4Best Management Practice for Control There are a number of factors that must be taken into consideration when choosing a control method for Phragmites. Some of these factors include: stand size, density, proximity to water and proximity to sensitive or desirable habitat/wildlife. Funding may also be a determining factor, as some methods can be extremely costly and may require an extensive amount of labour. Regardless of the control method(s) used, control of Phragmites generally requires multi-year monitoring and control to achieve significant results. 4.1Control Options There are both mechanical and chemical control options available, with the majority of best management recommendations promoting the combination of two methods. Mechanical options include excavation, mowing/rolling, hand cutting, flooding, prescribed burning, mechanical excavation and tarping. The following paragraphs in the sections provide a concise summary of the methods for controlling Invasive Phragmites. For full description please consult the Ontario Ministry of Best M handbook published in 2011. 4.1.1Mowing/Hand-Cutting Mowing or hand-cutting can be performed using heavy equipment with trimmer attachment, gas-powered trimmers or hand-held shears. Choosing a mowing or cutting technique should be reflective on the type of habitat in which the stand occurs and composition the stand. For example, large, monoculture Phragmites stands on dry land would necessitate heavy equipment with trimmer attachment. Whereas, a wet, sparse stand with 50% Phragmites and 50% native vegetation would require more selective cutting by a gas- powered trimmer or hand-held shears. When cutting over water, the stalks should be cut below the anticipated water level and as close to the substrate as possible. On dry land the stalks should be cut as close to the ground as possible. Cut stalks should be burned on site, or removed from the site and dealt with accordingly as discussed in the section 4.4 Phragmites and Invasive Species Action Plan 10 Page 368 of 491 14.b) Correspondence dated June 3, 2016 from Gayle Wood, CAO... 4.1.2Compression or Rolling Compression of a stand of Phragmites is achieved using heavy equipment and rollers. This method should be used in conjunction with herbicide and burning applications where possible. It is recommended that stands should be compressed in the fall when the herbicides have already translocated into the roots and wildlife has stopped utilizing the habitat. 4.1.3Burning Burning, when used in combination with mowing/cutting, compression and herbicide application is an effective way of removing aboveground biomass. Maximum benefit from burning is obtained when it takes place a minimum of 2 weeks following pesticide application. Burning is not recommended as a standalone method as it may encourage rhizome growth and increase stand densities. Prescribed burns should be performed by authorized personnel and follow federal and provincial guidelines and regulations. 4.1.4Herbicide Application In Ontario, herbicide storage, use, transport, and sale is regulated under the Pesticides Act and Regulation 63/09. Under this legislation, Phragmites on dry land can be controlled with approved herbicides subject to approval by the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry. No herbicides are approved for over-water use in Ontario herbicide control is not an option for Phragmites stands in standing water (MNRF, 2015). Please note, this includes agricultural drainage ditches with standing water, as well as flowing rivers, ponds and rivers. Large stands on dry land can be sprayed using a boom sprayer attached to an all-terrain vehicle (ATV) or similar vehicle. A small backpack sprayer may also be used for targeted spray or areas where vehicles cannot access. Wicking (direct contact with individual stalks using an absorbent glove) is typically used on small stands where Phragmites stalks can be targeted and native vegetation can be avoided. 4.1.5Flooding Flooding a stand of invasive Phragmites can generally only be undertaken where water control structures are present and may have varied results. Changes in water structure operations may require permitting or amendments to existing permits. For best results, Phragmites should be cut as low to the ground as possible prior to flooding, and flooded at a minimum of 1.5 meters for at least 6 weeks. 4.1.6Hand-pulling or Mechanical Excavation Mechanical excavation and hand-pulling involves attempting to removal of the entire invasive Phragmites plant, including roots from an area. It is not advisable as it is extremely labour-intensive and only effective if all plant material is removed off-site. Missing one fragment of the plant can cause the stand to regrow. Best success is typically achieved at initial colonization stage where Phragmites is growing on organic soils (i.e. plants are not well-established and pull relatively easily from organic soils). 4.1.7Tarping Tarping a stand of Phragmites requires the stalks to be cut to less than 10 cm, and then covered with a tarp or geotextile sheet for 6 months. This method is not labour intensive, but will require frequent site visits to ensure that Phragmites is not spreading to the Phragmites and Invasive Species Action Plan 11 Page 369 of 491 14.b) Correspondence dated June 3, 2016 from Gayle Wood, CAO... perimeter of the tarp. This method is not selective it kills all native vegetation and damages soil biota. Bare, disturbed soils are often colonized by other opportunistic species (including Phragmites). 4.2Timing and other considerations Timing of control is very important. Timing of cutting or applying herbicides is site-specific and must consider a number of factors: When will control efforts have the least amount of impact to: - Non-target plant species - Recreational users - Wildlife migration and reproductive windows When wcontrol efforts be most effective - Based on Phragmites life-cycle - Before seeding to minimize seed dispersal What type of control is being used - Time of cutting will vary based on technique being used Best results are typically achieved through multiple-year late summer cuts when most of ed out of its root system and into its stems, leaves and emerging seeds. Initial results along the Collingwood shoreline suggest that cutting of in-water stands (below water surface) is more effective that cutting of dry land stands. Cutting/mowing before spraying (on dry land stands) can improve the efficacy/economics of spraying operations. The table below outlines some of the addition considerations and effectiveness of each control method. Control Method Considerations Effectiveness Herbicides Application -Timing: Late summer to -Most effective method of early fall when plant is Phragmites control -Herbicides with glyphosate translocating nutrients to -When paired with a or imazapyr applied via roots prescribed burn, native spraying (non-selective) or -No herbicides approved for vegetation generally re- wicking (selective) over water use establishes quickly (may not -Spraying is ideal for large, be the case for decades-old dense Phragmites stands) monoculture stands; Wicking is ideal for small, sparse stands where native vegetation is to be avoided -Avoid wildlife nesting/usage times (spring-mid-summer) -Need permission from OMNRF and licensed pesticide applicator -Expensive Mowing -Timing: late July to early -Without being coupled with August at flowering/tassel herbicide application, may -Heavy equipment with stage take 3-5 years of annual trimmer attachment, -Not selective- optimal for treatments -Phragmites stalks cut below large, dry monoculture - pre-spray cuts can improve Phragmites and Invasive Species Action Plan 12 Page 370 of 491 14.b) Correspondence dated June 3, 2016 from Gayle Wood, CAO... lowest leaf leaving no more Phragmites stands efficacy of spraying than 10 cm of stalk. -All cut biomass must be removed or burned to stop re-establishment Hand-Cutting - Timing: late July to early -Without being coupled with August at flowering/tassel herbicide application, may -Use of handheld gas-stage take 3-5 years of annual powered trimmer or manual - Selective; optimal for treatments shears small, sparse stands, or -Phragmites stalks cut below stand with sensitive habitat lowest leaf leaving no more or species at risk than 10 cm of stalk. -Option for stands in water -All cut biomass must be removed stop re- establishment (burning not an option in sensitive habitats) Compression -Timing: after plant is dead -Allows for effective and and herbicides have efficient burn -compressing dead translocated -Easier post-cut monitoring Phragmites stands with -Not to be used as a and spot treatment of re- rollers standalone method growth -Not selective-should only be used on monoculture Phragmites stands Prescribed Burning -Timing: minimum of two -Easy post-cut monitoring weeks after herbicide and spot treatment of re- -Controlled burn in order to application growth remove biomass after -Not to be used as a -Allows faster regeneration mowing or herbicides standalone method of native vegetation application -Need authorized personnel and must follow federal and provincial guidelines and regulations Need to consider proximity to sensitive habitat Flooding -Timing: Late summer -Varied results and it may be -Stand must be in an area difficult to undertake -Use water to drown out where water can be Phragmites stands controlled (impoundment) -Water must be 1.5 meters higher than entire stand Hand-pulling/Mechanical -No plant material or soil -Only found to be effective Excavation containing plant material can on young stands (less than 2 remain on site or stand will years old) in sandy, dry or -Removal of all plant re-establish organic soils material and soil from a site Tarping -Timing: Spring/Summer -Need stands with direct (tarp must stay in place for 6 sunlight -Stands are cut to less than months) -May be more effective in Phragmites and Invasive Species Action Plan 13 Page 371 of 491 14.b) Correspondence dated June 3, 2016 from Gayle Wood, CAO... 10 cm -Not selective will kill areas with small/medium -Tarps or geotextile sheet to native vegetation and density stands (100 plants or solarize stand area damage soil biota less) -High temperatures will kill (opportunistic, non-native plants species including Phragmites often colonize these disturbed areas) 4.3Recommended Control Treatments Due to variability in many factors including stand size, density, proximity to water and proximity to sensitive or desirable habitat/wildlife, no one treatment can be recommended. The Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry recommends the following best management practices for Phragmites: In Phragmites stands where there is standing water: - Perform wildlife assessments - Herbicides cannot be applied - Cut/mow the stalks as low as possible - Tarping/solarisation not effective in standing water - Monitor and perform follow-up monitoring and spot treatment to areas with regrowth In Phragmites stands where water levels can be controlled: - Perform wildlife assessments - Cut/mow stalks as low as possible - Maintain the water level at a minimum of 1.5 metre for at least 6 weeks - Monitor and perform follow-up monitoring and spot treatment to areas with regrowth In Phragmites stands where there is no standing water: - Perform wildlife assessments - Obtain proper permits and time herbicide application appropriately - Mow or roll stand to compact dead biomass - Perform prescribed burn if appropriate - Monitor and perform follow-up monitoring and spot treatment to areas with regrowth We advise that the NVCA and watershed partners work closely together to review individual stands to determine a best practice management plan that addresses site constraints and maximizes control efforts. 4.4Disposal Phragmites is extremely persistent and vigorous and care should be taken when disposing the cut biomass. Cut stalks should be removed from the cut site and spread out flat to dry for 1-2 weeks on tarps or in black garbage bags. This will ensure that all viable seeds and rhizomes are killed. Dry Phragmites stalks can then be burned onsite or taken to an approved composting facility that meets the minimum temperature requirements as set by the Ontario Ministry of Environment Ontario Compost Quality Phragmites and Invasive Species Action Plan 14 Page 372 of 491 14.b) Correspondence dated June 3, 2016 from Gayle Wood, CAO... Standards to destroy seeds and plant fragments, and prevent future propagation (OMOE, 2012). In Simcoe County, these cut, dry stalks can be taken to any waste transfer station and put This process was reconfirmed by NVCA and Simcoe County staff in 2015. Due diligence on chosen disposal method is vital to ensure that control methods do not inadvertently facilitate the further spread of Phragmites in the watershed. 5What is the NVCA doing about Phragmites? The NVCA has been involved with a number of projects pertaining to the management of ranged from monitoring to control to providing outreach and developing education material to increase community awareness of invasive species issues as well as means to control Phragmites on private lands in these projects was to provide education and outreach, practical expertise and in field application of small scale removals. 5.1Wasaga Beach Provincial Park Phragmites became established along Wasaga Beach threaten native species habitat and dramatically changed the shoreline and associated views. To avoid adverse effects from the spread of Phragmites, the park and several other partners to develop a three-year Phragmites Action Plan (2009-2011) using best management options (including herbicides). NVCA staff participated on the steering committee for this project and providing technical input to the plan and outreach documents as well as on-the-ground monitoring support. Using the findings from this three-year study, the park continues to manage invasive Phragmites along the Wasaga Beach shoreline. The NVCA uses the findings from this study as part of input into Phragmites management in other areas, such as the West Collingwood Shoreline. Phragmites and Invasive Species Action Plan 15 Page 373 of 491 14.b) Correspondence dated June 3, 2016 from Gayle Wood, CAO... Figure 3 Phragmites Occurrences along the Wasaga Beach shoreline 5.2Minesing Wetlands The internationally significant Minesing Wetlands encompasses more than 6,000 hectares of unique assemblages of fens, marshes and swamps that support a vast array of sensitive flora and fauna. Phragmites was identified as a potential issue in the 2006 Minesing Wetlands Biological Inventory (Bowles et al., 2007). Stands were identified in sensitive fen habitats. Although these stands were later determined to be native (and not a threat to the fen), other stands of non-native Phragmites were identified within and proximal to the wetlands. NVCA staff continue to monitor Phragmites in the Minesing Wetlands. NVCA and Nature Conservancy Canada staff have also worked on Phragmites control with projects occurring in 2011 and 2013 along Concession 2 and along Willow Creek/Swaley Drain. Herbicides were used to control stands with good success. Phragmites and Invasive Species Action Plan 16 Page 374 of 491 14.b) Correspondence dated June 3, 2016 from Gayle Wood, CAO... Figure 4 Phragmites Occurrences in the Minesing Wetlands 5.3West Collingwood Shoreline The West Collingwood shoreline hosts globally rare coastal marshes that are home to a diversity of species, including Species at Risk and is a part of the larger Provincially Significant Silver Creek Wetland Complex. Phragmites infestation in the area caused community members to become concerned about shoreline aesthetics, shoreline access, property values and ecosystem degradation. Following an initial community stakeholder meeting in September 2014, Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority and Georgian Bay Forever coordinated a community action plan for the West Collingwood shoreline upon receiving external funding from Environment Canada. The NVCA aims to make this project a long-term sustainable initiative in the Collingwood community through education and outreach. Materials produced for this project such as outreach and educational materials and progress reports will support many efforts throughout the watershed (See appendix 1A for full list of educational materials). Phragmites and Invasive Species Action Plan 17 Page 375 of 491 14.b) Correspondence dated June 3, 2016 from Gayle Wood, CAO... Figure 5 Phragmites stands along the West Collingwood Shoreline 5.4Invasive Species Community Outreach Liaison Student Since 2007, the NVCA in partnership with the Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters hire a student who deals solely with invasive species education and awareness in the watershed. This student liaises with community groups and attends community events to deliver invading species awareness initiatives by delivering presentations and distributing educational materials. The student also monitors selected invasive species in the watershed and assists with control efforts for garlic mustard (Tiffin Conservation Area) and giant hogweed (Collingwood and Wasaga Beach). Recently, program. This program works with the landscape and horticulture industry to identify potentially invasive plants and promote native species alternatives. Nurseries that participate in this program promote the sale of native and non-invasive garden plants and In 2015, the student visited 14 locations throughout the watershed promoting the program including nurseries (Collingwood and Barrie), travel information centres and public libraries. 5.5Advocacy for Provincial Action Recognizing that an environmentally safe over-water pesticide is needed as part of the Phragmites control tool kit, NVCA prepared a support letter under Chair Loughe signature to Premier Wynne dated January 22, 2016. The letter (Appendix 3) supports: expedited approval of an herbicide for over-water use to combat Phragmites Phragmites and Invasive Species Action Plan 18 Page 376 of 491 14.b) Correspondence dated June 3, 2016 from Gayle Wood, CAO... expedited approval for limited aerial herbicide treatments to combat extensive monoculture stands of Phragmites establishment of a province-wide Phragmites control program control of Phragmites along provincial highways (significant spread vector) This letter closely corresponds with similar direction from Conservation Ontario as well as a February 16, 2016 Grey County resolution regarding Phragmites and its control. 6What are other agencies doing about Phragmites in NVCA jurisdiction and beyond? Whether local or provincial, every effort towards the fight against Phragmites is working toward making a difference. Several agencies and groups are making great efforts in our jurisdiction and beyond. This list is just a subsample of a multitude of efforts underway in southern Ontario to combat Phragmites. 6.1Blue Mountain Watershed Trust The Blue Mountain Watershed Trust has been monitoring and reporting on Phragmites in their area of interest (subwatersheds from Batteaux Creek west to the Beaver River) for several years. Since its inception in 2014, the Trust has been an important lead partner in the West Collingwood Shoreline project, participating in monitoring, control, education and reporting efforts. 6.2Georgian Bay Forever (GBF) Georgian Bay Forever is a charity dedicated to scientific research and public education on Georgian Bay's aquatic ecosystem. Their mission is to protect, enhance, and restore the aquatic ecosystem of Georgian Bay through a variety of research and education initiatives. In addition to its other Phragmites initiatives along the bay shoreline, GBF partnered with NVCA on the West Collingwood Clean-up Fund application to Environment Canada in 2014 and continues to play a key role in this multi-partnership community project. GBF held a community workshop on Phragmites ecology and control in Collingwood on April 21, 2016. 6.3Town of Collingwood The Town of Collingwood has been active on the Phragmites control front. Mayor Sandra Cooper continues to highlight the issue locally and through her work on the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence Cities Initiative. Town staff are a key partner in the West Collingwood Shoreline Phragmites control project and have provided staff for Phragmites control on Town lands as well as staff and trucks to support Phragmites disposal for the entire project area. 6.4Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) Environment and Climate Change Canada implemented its Lake Simcoe Eastern Georgian ay Cleanup funding to support collaborative projects with the goal of reducing phosphorous inputs into Lake Simcoe and South-eastern Georgian Bay, improve water quality, and conserve critical aquatic habitat and associated species in these waters. All projects must meet the intent of at least one of the priorities below: Phragmites and Invasive Species Action Plan 19 Page 377 of 491 14.b) Correspondence dated June 3, 2016 from Gayle Wood, CAO... Research and monitoring to improve environmental information for decision making in South-eastern Georgian Bay and/or Lake Simcoe; Conservation (e.g. protection, restoration, creation) of critical aquatic habitats and their associated species populations; Reduction of rural and urban non-point source phosphorous / nutrients; and Reduction of point source phosphorous / nutrients. Among these projects is the Phragmites Management along the West Collingwood Shoreline project which ECCC provided significant funding for. Without these funding opportunities special projects would not be possible. 6.5South Simcoe Streams Network (SSSN) The South Simcoe Streams Network is a grass roots, non-profit program designed to involve multiple partner and resident communities to help protect and promote a healthy community. SSSN removed Phragmites in the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority jurisdiction (Bradford-West Gwillimbury and Holland Marsh) in 2015. The group plans to move their efforts into NVCA jurisdiction where they will be controlling Phragmites at their Northwood site in Beeton in 2016. 6.6Ministry of Transportation The Ministry of Transportation does not have a formal program to deal with Phragmites but they have been removing it from their Western Region jurisdiction since 2012. Operations and maintenance crews try to identify and eradicate stands when small and more manageable. Most of the stands that fit these criteria are in the northerly part of the region (Huron, Bruce, Grey, Wellington and Dufferin). NVCA staff note that a stand of Phragmites along Highway 26, at the west end of Collingwood was treated by MTO between 2014 and 2015. MTO staff remark that there are several challenges to Phragmites control including lack of funding, standing water late in the season and difficulty spraying large, dense stands. The MTO has started a Vegetation Working Group which aims to provide consistency across the province for control methods and equipment cleaning protocol. They have also funded a project in conjunction with McMaster University to map changes in distribution patterns of Phragmites along highways using aerial photos. The NVCA has inquired to MTO about their intentions of moving these efforts into our jurisdiction (Central Region). They have confirmed that they will be applying herbicides and mowing along highways 400, 26, 12 and 96 in 2016. 6.7Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry The approval process to get an herbicide approved for over-water or near water application is quite complicated and lengthy. However, the province has recently taken steps toward making this a reality. The OMNRF and partners have applied for an emergency use registration application to the Pesticide Management Regulatory Agency (PMRA) to apply Roundup Custom (aquatic herbicides) in the Long Point and Rondeau Provincial Park areas. If approved, they will spray these areas as a pilot project. The MNRF will be tasked with developing a monitoring program for water, sediment and benthos in areas of treatment. If Phragmites and Invasive Species Action Plan 20 Page 378 of 491 14.b) Correspondence dated June 3, 2016 from Gayle Wood, CAO... the pilot project is successful, the MNRF expect to seek approval for other herbicide products (BASF). Monsanto, the manufacturers of Roundup Custom has demonstrated that they are interesting in pursuing permanent registration of this product in the future. BASF has also completed trials for its products Imazapyr and Arsenal Powerline and has submitted to the PMRA for approval of the product to be used in habitat for control in wet areas. We can expect to wait up to 2 years for the products to be fully registered and applicators will need a special permit to apply it. The PMRA is a federal organization, thus the registration will apply to all of the provinces and territories in Canada, however, the Ontario government has the ability to restrict certain products under the Ontario Cosmetic Pesticides Ban. NVCA tried to contact the MNRF Midhurst District to see what efforts were being made towards Phragmites management in our area and in their district but they have not responded as of this report date. 6.8Conservation Ontario Premier Wynne in regards to the efficient and environmentally responsible management of Phragmites in Ontario. In their letter they ask for support on the following initiatives: Expedited and streamlined approval of herbicides to enable control of water Expedited and steam approval of aerial treatments Establishing a province-wide Phragmites control program Controlling Phragmites along Provincial Highways Conservation Ontario notes throughout the letter that with a well-funded and well- coordinated effort from the provinces major players, the fight against Phragmites is a losing battle. Please see a copy of the full letter in Appendix 2B. 6.9Ontario Invasive Plant Council The Ontario Invasive Plant Council (OIPC) is a non-profit, multi-agency organization that provides leadership, expertise and a forum to engage and empower Ontarians to take action on invasive plant issues. Although they do not providing on the ground Phragmites removal in our area, they are advocating on behalf of all environmental organizations in order to form a province-wide invasive species strategy. They have developed countless best management practice guides and created framework for Ontario municipalities to deal with invasive species. NVCAs staff refer to the materials developed by the OIPC and its partners during every step of developing and implementing an invasive species management plan. 7Phragmites Action Plan and Recommendations The Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority is dedicated the preservation of a healthy watershed and will provide the expertise to help protect our water, our land and our future. The NVCA makes it our mission to partner with our watershed municipalities, provincial and federal agencies, and other interested stakeholders to achieve goals. Phragmites and Invasive Species Action Plan 21 Page 379 of 491 14.b) Correspondence dated June 3, 2016 from Gayle Wood, CAO... The proposed Action Plan focuses on Phragmites but also recognizes the presence (present and future) of other invasive species in the watershed. The Action Plan recognizes that success will come from a coordinated effort amongst a wide range of partners within our watershed community no one group or agency can tackle these issues on its own. The Action Plan focuses on outreach, invasive species monitoring/identification and assisting with coordination of monitoring and control projects (as capacity allows). 7.1Continue Identifying and Monitoring Invasive Species The NVCA will continue to identify and monitoring of invasive species throughout the watershed where budget allows. NVCA staff will continue to assist landowners with identification and providing technical advice on how to remove invasive species from their properties. 7.2Outreach and Education The NVCA is committed to inform and educate our Watershed Municipalities and other partners on the harmful effects of invasive species. The NVCA has recently generated several educational and outreach documents (Appendix 1A) on many invasive species that could be used as-is or modified in order to meet the needs of the partner. The EDDmapS is a database that allows the public to enter new invasive species records on- line and allows the province (and other partners) to track invasive species distribution. EDDmapS is an early detection and distribution mapping system started by a group called the Bugwood Network, now known at the Center for Invasive Species and Ecosystem Health. The system has developed web-based mapping of invasive species, which is a key component in an Early Detection and Rapid Response (EDRR) program. An EDRR program allows you to track and monitoring locations of an invasive species in an area. A quick response to an early detection will ensure that new infestations do not become a larger problem. EDDmapS is available on a computer desktop or cell phone and is extremely user friendly. Users upload a picture and specific information about the infestation and experts verify the sighting. The sighting shows up on a map with the picture that the user took. The application includes invasive species mapping in both Canada and the United States. Thus, we can see species that are on the forefront of making their way into Ontario, and what path they might take. NVCA staff feel that this is a very useful tool moving forward. The infrastructure is already established and it is important that we take advantage of it. NVCA staff will ensure that links to this program are on invasive species documents/website sections to maximize uptake within the watershed community. Invasive species mapping in the database currently does not reflect true distribution and abundance within our watershed. For example, Phragmites is not documented as being present along the Collingwood shoreline in provincial mapping at present. 7.3Invasive Phragmites Workshop The NVCA suggests hosting Phragmites Workshop in Fall 2016 for all of our watershed municipalities and partners. The NVCA has been in contact with the Ontario Invasive Plant Council (OIPC) who has developed a workshop that they normally run to assist Phragmites and Invasive Species Action Plan 22 Page 380 of 491 14.b) Correspondence dated June 3, 2016 from Gayle Wood, CAO... municipalities with developing an invasive species management strategy. They OIPC have a number of invasive species and Phragmites experts that will provide presentations on a variety of topics. We are working together with the OIPC to develop a workshop agenda that will meet the needs of our watershed municipalities and partners. A broad range of invitees including NVCA Board and Committee members and municipal roads/parks staff as well as agricultural, development and environmental stakeholders and the general public is contemplated. Main topics for the workshop would include, but not limited to: Phragmites Identification Phragmites Best Management Practices for control How to Plan a Phragmites Control Project Other Invasive Species Issues By the end of the workshop, attendees will be equipped with the expertise/contacts to implement best management practices, and be able to train seasonal and summer staff on each of the topics. 7.4Provide Technical Advice The NVCA will provide technical advice where ever possible to help support our watershed municipalities and other partners. This would include our proposed workshop, as well as additional technical assistance where necessary. 7.5Facilitate Partnerships NVCA envisions a role whereby NVCA staff will assist watershed groups looking to control invasive species. Similar to the West Collingwood project, NVCA staff can assist in bringing together partners to combat invasive species as well as technical input to assist with invasive species monit 7.6Provide Support to Partners The NCVA is dedicated to supporting its partners in their initiatives to advocate invasive species issues and recommendations. The NVCA fully supports Conservation Ontario in their endeavor to advocate for the creation of efficient and environmentally responsible management for invasive species such as Phragmites. 7.7Apply for Project Grants The NVCA has and will continue to apply to project grants that are applicable to invasive species monitoring and control efforts. The NVCA plans to re-apply for funding from the Lake Simcoe/Eastern Georgian Bay Clean-up Fund if the program is continued into future years. 7.8Participate in Invasive Species related projects NVCA monitoring staff will continue to participate in invasive species related projects when the opportunities arise and where budget allows. Phragmites and Invasive Species Action Plan 23 Page 381 of 491 14.b) Correspondence dated June 3, 2016 from Gayle Wood, CAO... 7.9Support Municipalities with regulation, by-laws and non-regulatory strategies The NVCA is dedicated to supporting the watershed municipalities in developing regulations, by-laws and non-regulatory strategies. The following paragraphs outline some ideas and recommendations for these strategies: 7.9.1Recommendations for Non-regulatory Strategies There are a number of ways that the community can be engaged and educated about invasive species using non-regulatory strategies. These include, but are not limited to: Create an Early Detection and Rapid Response (EDRR) watershed wide (all municipalities) o Utilize EDDmapS to map invasive species throughout the watershed (see appendix 1) Land-use Planning developing best management practices for developers o seeding large disturbed areas with nurse crop so that invasive species are less like to establish. o Establish best management practices for moving fill and equipment cleaning protocols Green Space Native Planting Strategy incorporate invasive species management into municipal landscaping and horticulture activities. o Launch program publically to raise community awareness o Lead by example (utilize native species wherever possible as part of municipal plantings) Road and Highway Maintenance o Establish best management practices for spoil disposal and equipment cleaning protocols Public Education and Awareness via website, social media, mail-outs, workshops, signage, etc) o Municipalities host workshops for landowners/community/local industries (nurseries, pet stores, horticultural groups) o Develop resources on Proper Green Waste Disposal, etc. o Promote the OIPC Grow Me Instead Guide and Nursery Recognition Program Develop a list of local nurseries participating in program and make available to public o week in late July or early August for example Create a municipal volunteer program to help run events, etc. o Landowner incentives waive or lower tipping fees and offer free invasive species pick-up 7.9.2Recommendations for Regulatory Strategies Education and non-regulatory strategies are the key tools for invasive species management, however, regulations and by-law can be used to support these efforts. 7.9.3Municipal by-laws under the Weed Control Act Municipalities have the authority to create by-laws in accordance with the Weed Control Act, which regulates the noxious weed list. Refer to section 3.3.1. Phragmites and Invasive Species Action Plan 24 Page 382 of 491 14.b) Correspondence dated June 3, 2016 from Gayle Wood, CAO... 7.9.4Other by-laws There are few municipalities that have by-laws pertaining to invasive species outside of the Weed Control Act. Some by-laws to consider can include: Prohibiting the dumping of yard waste into parks and natural areas Prohibiting the removal of plants from parks and city-owned natural areas Regulating soil transfer and disposal 8Invasive Species the Dirty Dozen Phragmites is not the only invasive species threatening our watershed. Many species are posing imminent threats to our environment and economy. The top 12 invasive species (excluding Phragmites) that are threatening our region are: 8.1Giant Hogweed (Heracleum mantegazzianum) Giant hogweed is a tall herbaceous plant (2-4 m) with a hollow, hairy stem with purple spots and large white umbrella shaped flower clusters. It is often confused with look-a-likes such as Queen burns that are worsened by exposure to sunlight (a phenomenon called phytophotodermatitus). Found in a variety of habitats, Giant hogweed has a spotty distribution in the NVCA watershed. NVCA staff continue to document its distribution. NVCA control efforts have focused on stands in the Town of Collingwood and the Town of Wasaga Beach. 8.2Dog Strangling Vine (Vincetoxicum rossicum) Dog Strangling Vine is a vine grows 1-2 m tall by entangling itself onto other plants. It has pinkish purple star-shaped flowers and bean-shaped seed pods. Each plant can produce up to 28,000 seeds per square metre and are attached to white fluff (similar to milkweed) that are easily transported by wind. This plant can completely cover a forest floor, choking out all other species. Dog Strangling Vine poses a threat to Monarch Butterflies (a Species at Risk in Ontario) as the butterflies lay their eggs on the plant but larvae are not able to complete their lifecycle and die. In the NVCA jurisdiction, established communities are most common south of Highway 89. It is also present along portions of the Collingwood shorelinenear the globally rare coastal marshes. A small patch in the internationally signification Minesing Wetlands is being controlled in partnership with Nature Conservancy Canada, Simcoe County and NVCA. 8.3Himalayan Balsam (Impatiens glandulifera) This 1-2 m tall herbaceous plant has a fleshy-pink stem and distinctly jagged, opposite leaves. It has an irregular cone-shaped pink flower which draws pollinators away from other surrounding native plants. The seed pods explode when they are touched sending hundreds of seeds in every direction, up to 5 meters away. Himalayan Balsam creates dense stands that crowd out native species and reduce biodiversity and ecological value of land. Himilayan Balasam is well documented in the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority according to EDDMapS. It is found in Harbourview Park in Collingwood and near the south Phragmites and Invasive Species Action Plan 25 Page 383 of 491 14.b) Correspondence dated June 3, 2016 from Gayle Wood, CAO... shore of Bass Lake. It thrives in riparian areas such as river edges where it can cause erosion issues. 8.4Garlic Mustard (Alliaria petiolate) Garlic mustard is an invasive plant species that can quickly invade and dominate the forest floor, limiting or eliminating the growth of native species such as trilliums and violets. In North America, Garlic Mustard has a lack of natural predators. It also has a fast growth rate and can disperse 15,000 seeds per plant, which remain viable in the soil for up to five years. Garlic mustard has begun to colonize the NVCA watershed. Heavy infestations can be observed along some trail sections of the Bruce Trail. NVCA staff have removed Garlic Mustard from the Tiffin Centre for Conservation for over a decade. NVCA staff partner with the Nature League on an annual removal effort at the Petun Conservation Area. 8.5Wild Parsnip (Pastinaca sativa) This plant is in the same family as Giant Hogweed, but has yellow coloured flowers and only reaches 1.5 m tall. The dense stands can out-compete native species. Similarly to Giant Hogweed, skin exposure to its sap causes severe burns. Wild Parsnip is scattered throughout the watershed. Large stands are present along the Mad River valley from Creemore downstream to the Minesing Wetlands. It is also present in the Town of Collingwood where Town staff are actively controlling populations along trail systems. 8.6 Rough Manna Grass (Glyceria maxima) Rough Manna Grass can grow up to 2.5 meters in height and features an upright seed head. This grass thrives in moist, nutrient rich habitats where it forms dense stands that crowd out native vegetation. Rough Manna Grass was first reported in the Minesing Wetlands in colonized hundreds of hectares of formerly forested swamp habitat. Removal of the grass is not possible due to its location and density. Instead we must focus on preventing its spread to new areas of the wetlands. 8.7Japanese Knotweed (Fallopia japonica) Japanese Knotweed has round stems that are reddish-purple, smooth and have a bamboo- like appearance. It has small flowers that are greenish-white and has ovate leaves. Japanese Knotweed is one of the hardest invasive plants to control due to its aggressive and extensive root system. It is a popular plant among gardeners because of its unique look. Japanese Knotweed is not well documented in the NVCA jurisdiction but NVCA staff note that is fairly common along roadside ditches. It is also documented along the Collingwood waterfront and Oak Street Canal. NVCA staff have also observed large stands along Innisfil Creek, South of Alliston. Phragmites and Invasive Species Action Plan 26 Page 384 of 491 14.b) Correspondence dated June 3, 2016 from Gayle Wood, CAO... 8.8Emerald Ash Borer (Argrilus planipennis) The Emerald Ash Borer (EAB) is a small (10 - 13 mm) shiny emerald green beetle that kills ash trees. Ash trees are found throughout forests and woodlots in the watershed and are commonly used as a street or landscape tree. EAB is an invasive pest, native to Asia and was first noticed in North America in 2002. As of August 2014, the County of Simcoe has confirmed sightings of emerald ash borer within municipalities of New Tecumseth, Bradford West Gwillimbury, Essa, Adjala- Tosorontio, Oro-Medonte and the City of Barrie. Spread of the borer is of high concern in our watershed from a natural and socio-economic perspective. 8.9Common Buckthorn (Rhamnus cathartica) This small tree grows between 5-6 m tall. It has smooth, dark green leaves that are finely toothed, and oppositely arranged along the stem. Most branches older than 1 year end in a thorn. It has small yellow flower clusters and berry-like black fruit in late summer and fall. Common buckthorn is fairly common in the NVCA watershed with particularly strong infestations in and around Collingwood. Glossy buckthorn is less common but is invading our northern wetlands in Oro-Medonte and Springwater townships. 8.10Round Goby (Neogobius melanostomus) This invasive fish is established in the Great Lakes and Lake Simcoe. It is 6 to 16 centimetres long with a cylindrical body and a rounded, blunt snout. They resemble our native sculpins, but are best distinguished by the black spot on the dorsal fin. Round goby are common along the Nottawasaga Bay shoreline and abundant in Collingwood Harbour. They are penetrated tributary systems such as Black Ash Creek in Collingwood. Round goby are present in the Nottawasaga River at least as far upstream as Angus and are present in the lower reaches of the Pine River. 8.11Rusty Crayfish (Orconectes rusticus) Rusty Crayfish tend to be larger than our native crayfish and their legs are relatively long. They have two red/orange patches on either side of their thorax and thing black bands on the tip of their claws. Rusty Crayfish can feed at twice the rate of native crayfish and can produce up to 200 eggs during breeding season. Rusty crayfish have been reported from a number of watercourses within the watershed including: Masters Creek (headwater tributary of the Nottawasaga River), Boyne River, Lamont Creek, Egbert Creek, Black Ash Creek, and Besley Drain (tributary to the Boyne River). 8.12Zebra/Quagga Mussel (Dreissena polymorpha & D. bugensis) The Zebra Mussel is usually 2-4 cm long and triangular in shape and have brown to yellow colour and zigzagging pattern. Similarly, Quagga Mussels are 2-3cm in length, are more round in shape and have concentric rings. Both the Quagga Zebra Mussels have the capability to densely colonize hard and soft surfaces of lake bottoms. Quagga mussels tend to inhabit deeper waters than zebra mussels. Both mussels can have a significant impact on lake ecosystems as they filter nutrients out of the water at an exponential rate. Phragmites and Invasive Species Action Plan 27 Page 385 of 491 14.b) Correspondence dated June 3, 2016 from Gayle Wood, CAO... Colonization of water-intake pipes at power stations and water treatment plants can cause clogging. Zebra and quagga mussels are abundant throughout Georgian Bay including Nottawasaga Bay and have impacted the entire lake ecosystem. They are present in the Collingwood Harbour and at the mouth of the Nottawasaga River. They have also been observed in Bass Lake. 9Emerging Invasive Species Concerns A number of invasive aquatic and terrestrial flora and fauna are knocking on southern Hemlock Woolly Adelgid has decimated Eastern Hemlock stands in the northeastern United States and is nearing our border. Asian Long-horned Beetle, once established, would threaten our maple forests. Four species the Hemlock Woolly Adelgid, the Asian Long-horned Beetle, Asian Carp and Silver Grass are highlighted below. As a watershed community it is important to be aware of emerging invasive species issues early detection and elimination is the most effective and most economical means to deal with invasive species. 9.1Hemlock Woolly Adelgid (Adelges tsugae) Hemlock Woolly Adelgid (HWA) is a tiny forest pest that targets hemlock species. It was In Western region of Canada the Western Hemlocks are seemingly tolerant to the HWA. Species found in Eastern US, such as Eastern Hemlock are susceptible to HWA and it has caused major damage to these populations (Ryan, 2013). Foresters in Eastern Canada are concerned about the effects this pest may have on our coniferous and mixed forests. HWA was found in isolated locations in Etobicoke first in 2012, and subsequently in 2014 and 2015 (Ryan, 2013). It was also found in the Niagara Gorge in 2013 (Ryan, 2013). The pest is well established in nearby forests in the United States but it is not known whether or not the adelgid has an established population here in Ontario as it is difficult to detect. As with all invasive species, early detection allows for more mitigation options. 9.2Asian Long-Horned Beetle (Anoplophora glabripennis) Asian Long-Horned Beetle (ALHB) is an invasive forest pest that attacks nearly all broadleaf trees; with native maples being the preferred host (OFAH/OMNR Invading Species Awareness Program, 2012b). Populations were first introduced to North America through the transportation of untreated wooden shipping pallets in the 1 Invading Species Awareness Program, 2012b). Adults lay their eggs in hardwood trees and larvae tunnel through the living tissue of the tree, stopping the flow of water and nutrients and eventually killing the tree (OFAH/OMNR Invading Species Awareness Program, 2012b). It was first detected in an industrial park in Toronto in 2003 and was not found anywhere in Ontario between 2007 and 2012 (OFAH/OMNR Invading Species Awareness Program, 2012b). The early detection and rapid response to the first incident in 2003 proved seemingly effective. In 2013, ALHB was detected again near the Pearson International Airport (OFAH/OMNR Invading Species Awareness Program, 2012b). The CFIA has Phragmites and Invasive Species Action Plan 28 Page 386 of 491 14.b) Correspondence dated June 3, 2016 from Gayle Wood, CAO... established a regulated area around the detection site and there is restriction on the movement of nursery stock, trees, logs, lumber, wood, woodchips and bark chips from certain deciduous trees identified as hosts for ALHB (OFAH/OMNR Invading Species Awareness Program, 2012b). 9.3Asian carp (Hypophthalmichthys spp., Ctenopharyngodon idella and Mylopharyngodon piceus) Asian c Silver carp, Bighead carp, Grass carp and Black carp. These species grow rapidly, can eat up to 20% of their body weight in one day and reproduce rapidly OFAH/OMNR Invading Species Awareness Program. (2012c). The s would result in displacement of native fishes. This could result in damage to the sport and commercial fishing industry OFAH/OMNR Invading Species Awareness Program. (2012c). The most like point of entry for Asian Carp is the Chicago Area Waterway System (CAWS) into Lake Michigan (DFO, 2012). If the carp breach the barrier, it could take less than 5 years for the carp to establish in Lake Huron (DFO, 2012). In 20 years, the carp could have a good foothold in Lake Huron and Georgian Bay, and would then spread into Lake Erie (DFO, 2012). The overall risk is directly related to population establishment, thus preventing the introduction of these species is key. Please follow link to learn more about the Asian carp program: https://www.thestar.com/news/insight/2015/09/28/meet-canadas-asian-carp- detective.html 9.4Chinese Silver Grass (Miscanthus sinensis & M. sacchariflorus) Miscanthus grasses are a perennial plant typically used in ornamental plants, but are also used as a barrier plant along roadside ditches (OFAH/OMNR Invading Species Awareness Program, 2012a). This plant can reach heights of 2 meters or more, and has flowers that are pink to red and turn tan in the fall (OFAH/OMNR Invading Species Awareness Program, 2012a). Similarly to Phragmites, Miscanthus is spread by underground roots and by seed and thrives in mid to cold temperature climates (OFAH/OMNR Invading Species Awareness Program, 2012a). Miscanthus forms thick stands that may crowd out or shade out other native plant species (OFAH/OMNR Invading Species Awareness Program, 2012a). The dense stands are highly flammable and may pose a fire hazard (OFAH/OMNR Invading Species Awareness Program, 2012a). Dead stalks decompose slowly, resulting in limited amount of nutrients returning to the soil (OFAH/OMNR Invading Species Awareness Program, 2012a). Notably in the NVCA watershed, the grass is seen growing rapidly in the roadside ditches in Springwater Township along Snow Valley Road and in the Town of Innisfil, along Innisfil Beach Road West of Highway 400. This grass has not had a lot of publicity but it is on our watch list as an emerging invasive species. Phragmites and Invasive Species Action Plan 29 Page 387 of 491 14.b) Correspondence dated June 3, 2016 from Gayle Wood, CAO... 10Conclusion Invasive species continue to present a significant challenge within the NVCA watershed. Initial monitoring and control efforts have been initiated by NVCA staff in partnership with a variety of watershed agencies, groups and private landowners in selected areas for key species of concern. The proposed Ac work with our watershed partners and champions to address invasive species within the watershed. NVCA staff note that no one agency or group can be effective alone in addressing invasive species and that broad partnerships are required to address invasive species at a local, region, provincial and national level. Phragmites and Invasive Species Action Plan 30 Page 388 of 491 14.b) Correspondence dated June 3, 2016 from Gayle Wood, CAO... 11References Catling, P.M. (2005). New "top of the list" invasive plants of natural habitats in Canada. BEN - Botanical Electronic News. 345. Cvetkovic, M., Wei, A. and Chow-Fraser, P. (2010). Relative importance of macrophyte community versus water quality variables for predicting fish assemblages in coastal wetlands of the Laurentian Great Lakes. Journal of Great Lakes Research. 36: 64 73. Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO). (2012). Ecological Risk of Bighead & Silver Carps. Retrieved online from, http://www.invadingspecies.com/invaders/fish/asian- carp/ Halloran, Joe, Anderson, Hayley and Tassie, Danielle. (2013). Clean Equipment Protocol for Industry. Peterborough Stewardship Council and Ontario Invasive Plant Council. Peterborough, ON. Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters. (2015). Invasive Phragmites. Retrieved online from, www.invadingspecies.com OFAH/OMNR Invading Species Awareness Program. (2012a). Miscanthus. Retrieved from: http://www.invadingspecies.com. OFAH/OMNR Invading Species Awareness Program. (2012b). Asian Long-horned Beetle. Retrieved from: http://www.invadingspecies.com. OFAH/OMNR Invading Species Awareness Program. (2012c). Asian Carps. Retrieved from: http://www.invadingspecies.com. Ontario Invasive Plant Council. (2015). Creating an Invasice Plant Management Strategy: A Framework for Ontario Municipalities. Available online at, http://www.ontarioinvasiveplants.ca/files/PlantManagementStrategy_2015_March17 2015_D3_PRINTFINAL.pdf Ontario Invasive Plant Council. 2016. Invasive Phragmites (European Common Reed): Best Management Practices. Retrieved online from, http://www.ontarioinvasiveplants.ca/files/2016_Phragmites_Webinar_Feb_3_2016_ALWL.p df Ontario Ministry of the Environment. (2012). Ontario Compost Quality Standards. Retrieved online from, https://dr6j45jk9xcmk.cloudfront.net/documents/1234/104-ontario- compost-quality-standards-en.pdf Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. (2011). Invasive Phragmites Best Management Practices, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Peterborough, Ontario. 17p. Ministry of Transportation. (2015). Highway Infrastructure Innovation Funding Program. Guidelines for Ontario Universities and Colleges. Retrieved online from, http://carleton.ca/curo/wp-content/uploads/HIIFP-2015-Guidelines.pdf Phragmites and Invasive Species Action Plan 31 Page 389 of 491 14.b) Correspondence dated June 3, 2016 from Gayle Wood, CAO... Ryan, Kathleen. 2013. Invasive Pests:Hemlock Woolly Adelgid. Retrieved online from, http://www.invasiveinsects.ca/hwa/hwa.html Swearingen, J. and K. Saltonstall. 2010. Phragmites Field Guide: Distinguishing Native and Exotic Forms of Common Reed (Phragmites australis) in the United States. Plant Conservation Alliance, Weeds Gone Wild. http://www.nps.gov/plants/alien/pubs/index.htm Vegh, K. (2016). Municipal Drainage and Phragmites. Ontario Invasive Plant Council Webinar. Retrieved online from, http://www.ontarioinvasiveplants.ca/files/MUNICIPAL_DRAINAGE_AND_PHRAGMITES_POW ER_POINT_PRESENTATION.pdf Phragmites and Invasive Species Action Plan 32 Page 390 of 491 14.b) Correspondence dated June 3, 2016 from Gayle Wood, CAO... 1Appendix A Common and Glossy Buckthorn Factsheet Dog-Strangling Vine Factsheet Emerald Ash Borer Factsheet Garlic Mustard Factsheet Giant Hogweed Factsheet Norway Maple Factsheet Phragmites Factsheet Rough Manna Grass Factsheet Round Goby Factsheet Rusty Crayfish Factsheet Wild Parsnip Factsheet Zebra and Quagga Mussel Factsheet NVCA Dirty Dozen factsheet Phragmites in Western Collingwood Materials Phragmites Management a Landow (Example Below) Phragmites in West Collingwood (Example Below) Alternative to Phragmites Ornamental Grasses Factsheet Phragmites and Invasive Species Action Plan 33 Page 391 of 491 14.b) Correspondence dated June 3, 2016 from Gayle Wood, CAO... Phragmites and Invasive Species Action Plan 34 Page 392 of 491 14.b) Correspondence dated June 3, 2016 from Gayle Wood, CAO... Phragmites and Invasive Species Action Plan 35 Page 393 of 491 14.b) Correspondence dated June 3, 2016 from Gayle Wood, CAO... Phragmites and Invasive Species Action Plan 36 Page 394 of 491 14.b) Correspondence dated June 3, 2016 from Gayle Wood, CAO... Phragmites and Invasive Species Action Plan 37 Page 395 of 491 14.b) Correspondence dated June 3, 2016 from Gayle Wood, CAO... Phragmites and Invasive Species Action Plan 38 Page 396 of 491 14.b) Correspondence dated June 3, 2016 from Gayle Wood, CAO... Phragmites and Invasive Species Action Plan 39 Page 397 of 491 14.b) Correspondence dated June 3, 2016 from Gayle Wood, CAO... Phragmites and Invasive Species Action Plan 40 Page 398 of 491 14.b) Correspondence dated June 3, 2016 from Gayle Wood, CAO... Phragmites and Invasive Species Action Plan 41 Page 399 of 491 14.b) Correspondence dated June 3, 2016 from Gayle Wood, CAO... 2Appendix B Phragmites and Invasive Species Action Plan 42 Page 400 of 491 14.b) Correspondence dated June 3, 2016 from Gayle Wood, CAO... Phragmites and Invasive Species Action Plan 43 Page 401 of 491 14.b) Correspondence dated June 3, 2016 from Gayle Wood, CAO... Phragmites and Invasive Species Action Plan 44 Page 402 of 491 14.b) Correspondence dated June 3, 2016 from Gayle Wood, CAO... Phragmites and Invasive Species Action Plan 45 Page 403 of 491 14.b) Correspondence dated June 3, 2016 from Gayle Wood, CAO... 3Appendix C Phragmites and Invasive Species Action Plan 46 Page 404 of 491 14.b) Correspondence dated June 3, 2016 from Gayle Wood, CAO... Phragmites and Invasive Species Action Plan 47 Page 405 of 491 14.b) Correspondence dated June 3, 2016 from Gayle Wood, CAO... Phragmites and Invasive Species Action Plan 48 Page 406 of 491 14.b) Correspondence dated June 3, 2016 from Gayle Wood, CAO... Phragmites and Invasive Species Action Plan 49 Page 407 of 491 14.b) Correspondence dated June 3, 2016 from Gayle Wood, CAO... Phragmites and Invasive Species Action Plan 50 Page 408 of 491 14.b) Correspondence dated June 3, 2016 from Gayle Wood, CAO... Phragmites and Invasive Species Action Plan 51 Page 409 of 491 14.c) Minutes of Sustainability Plan Steering Committee (SPS... Sustainability Plan Steering Committee (SPSC) Meeting Date Thursday, May 5, 2016 Time 10am-12pm Location North Simcoe Community Futures Development Corporation), 105 Fourth Street, Midland Attendees Chris McLaughlin, General Manager, NSCFDC Councillor Mike Lauder, Ward 2, Town of Penentanguishene Doug Luker, CAO/Clerk, Township of Tiny Jonathan Pauk, Planning Intern, Township of Tay Keith Sherman, Executive Director, Severn Sound Environmental Association Marina Whelan, Program Manager, Health Protection Service, Simcoe Muskoka District Health Unit Patricia File, Councillor, Ward 1, Town of Midland Ron Stevens, Councillor, Ward 4, Township of Severn Steffen Walma, Deputy Mayor, Township of Tiny, County of Simcoe representative Steve Farquharson, Director of Planning and Development, Township of Tay Tracy Roxborough, Sustainability Coordinator, Sustainable Severn Sound Regrets Andrea Betty, Director of Planning and Community Development, Town of Penentanguishene Councillor Barbara Coutanche, Township of Oro-Medonte Jennifer Schnier, Communications and Economic Development Officer, Township of Georgian Bay Morgan Levison, Public Health Promotor, Simcoe Muskoka District Health Unit Jonathan Main, Councillor, Ward 1, Town of Midland Nick Popovich, Director of Development Services, Township of Georgian Bay 1.0 Welcome and Approval of Agenda Discussion: Chair requested any additions or changes to the agenda, with SSS adding Item 3.6 for discussion (August 2016, Walk for Water event), with updated agenda provided for attendees. Chair then request motion to approve the agenda. Moved by R. Stevens, seconded by C. McLaughlin. Agenda approved. 2.0 Approval of Minutes from the 3-Mar-2016 SPSC Meeting SPSC APPROVEDMINUTES 5-MAY-2016 Sustainable Severn Sound (SSS) | 105 Fourth Street, P.O. Box 8, Midland, ON | L4R 4K6 | 705.526.1371 x.112 Page 410 of 491 14.c) Minutes of Sustainability Plan Steering Committee (SPS... Discussion: Coordinator advised that the DRAFT minutes were provided to the SPSC on 8-Mar-16, with a request to - Mar-16 minutes. Moved by K. Sherman, seconded by M. Whelan. Minutes of the 3-Mar-16 SPSC meeting approved 5-May-16. Action Items: 1) Coordinator to distribute approved minutes to the SPSC and municipal clerks for distribution to councils. 3.0 2016 SSS Work Plan Items (Project Charter #1 and Project Charter #2 Actions) 3.1 Sustainability Speaker Series, March 22 Event Discussion: SSS overviewed the Event Summary Report as enclosed. Action Items: None required. 3.2 Sustainability Speaker Series, June 2016 Event Discussion: SSS reviewed the documents below, with the committee providing comment on the event agenda, poster, registration page and budget. SSS noted that although funding from the County of Simcoe has not been approved at this time; the event can be covered by deferred revenue from 2015. C. McLaughlin noted an error in the budget document. SSS will append and provide with the draft minutes. Discussion from the committee included a recommendation to directly invite stakeholder organizations/agencies, and to include partner displays as applicable at the event. All documents were received and approved, as moved by M. Whelan, seconded by S. Walma. Motion approved. Event Poster Registration Link http://sustainabilityspeakerseriesnatureandhealth.eventbrite.ca SPSC APPROVEDMINUTES 5-MAY-2016 Sustainable Severn Sound (SSS) | 105 Fourth Street, P.O. Box 8, Midland, ON | L4R 4K6 | 705.526.1371 x.112 Page 411 of 491 14.c) Minutes of Sustainability Plan Steering Committee (SPS... SPSC to Review Budget Revised Budget (6-May-16) Action Items: 1) SSS to invite stakeholder organizations as discussed to attend the event. 2) SPSC members to assist with the distribution of any promotional items, including event poster, registration link, and media releases after shared with them by SSS. 3) SSS to revise the event budget, as per the correction recommended by C. McLaughlin and include with the DRAFT minutes (as enclosed above). 3.3 Case Study Information Sheet Discussion: SSS provided an example of a Case Study developed for the new website, as enclosed below. SSS described the case study and the approach, explaining that the case studies will provide content for the new website, but will also be used in the development of the Sustainability Report Card, and the presentation of Business Case documents to municipalities to encourage the adoption of the featured practices. The following documents were provided for SPSC information: Case Study Criteria, Draft Case Study, List of Selected Case Studies (chart below). SPSC APPROVEDMINUTES 5-MAY-2016 Sustainable Severn Sound (SSS) | 105 Fourth Street, P.O. Box 8, Midland, ON | L4R 4K6 | 705.526.1371 x.112 Page 412 of 491 14.c) Minutes of Sustainability Plan Steering Committee (SPS... 4Page ment nator Facilities | 705.526.1371 x.112 r, Recreation and Community Services L4R 4K6 n, Director of Planning and Development | 2016 - MAY - Project ContactJessica Low, Project ConsultantWaste Management DepartmentKris Murphy, Planning and Community Services Administrative Support PersonAndrea Betty, Director of Planning and Community DevelopNicholas Popovich, Director of Development ServicesJennifer Whiston, Community Support WorkerPatricia J. Harwood, Manager of Recreation and FacilitiesAndrew Fyfe, Director of PlanningPatricia J. Harwood, Manager of Recreation andBryan Anderson, Manager of Parks and RecreationBryan Anderson, Manager of Parks and Recreation (plus Councillor Root)Steve FarquharsoSteve Farquharson, Director of Planning and Development (plus Karma staff)Keith Sherman, Executive Director, Severn Sound Environmental AssociationShawn Persaud, Manager of Planning & DevelopmentBonita Desroches, Community Recreation CoordiBonita Desroches, Community Recreation CoordinatorJamie Galloway, Town EngineerCrystal Budgell, CEO/Chief LibrarianJamie Galloway, Town EngineerWes Crown, Director of Planning and BuildingJim Reichheld, Municipal Law EnforcementShawn Binns, Director, Recreation and Community ServicesShawn Binns, Directo MINUTES 5 APPROVED SPSC Communication 105 Fourth Street, P.O. Box 8, Midland, ON - Idling Policy - ti Project NameFood and Agriculture CharterEvent Recycling Training ManualCommunity Design ManualBeautification ProgramElectric Vehicle Charging StationGeorgian Bay Fresh Food BasketOutdoor Gym EquipmentColdwater Carpool LotWashago Community Centre LED SignPhragmites ProjectTay Bike DayTree Replacement ProgramTay Community Garden and OrchardTay Shoreline GuideSeptic Reinspection ProgramHealth and Wellness DayThe Township of Tiny Trails and AT Master PlanDowntown Recycling Bin PilotLibrary Green RoofSolar Powered School Zone Signage AssembliesNative Species Landscape List for DevelopmentAnLED Streetlight ConversionStaff Conversion to Tablets/E Sustainable Severn Sound (SSS) | MedonteMedonte -- MunicipalityCounty of SimcoeCounty of SimcoeTown of PenetanguisheneTown of PenetanguisheneTownship of Georgian BayTownship of Georgian Bay Township of SevernTownship of SevernTownship of SevernTownship of TayTownship of TayTownship of Tay Township of TayTownship of TayTownship of TinyTownship of TinyTownship of TinyTown of MidlandTown of MidlandTown of MidlandTown of MidlandTown of MidlandTownship of OroTownship of Oro Page 413 of 491 14.c) Minutes of Sustainability Plan Steering Committee (SPS... Action Items: 1) SSS to continue requesting information from each municipality to develop the case studies as selected. 2) SPSC members to assist with the transfer of this information as requested. 3) SSS to connect with M. Whelan in reference to applicable case studies by the SMDHU. 3.4 Partnership/Collaboration with Georgian College Discussion: Item was reviewed by the Website Redesign Sub-Committee. No review needed by the SPSC at this time. Sample Survey provided to the SPSC for information only: Sample Survey - Revised 17-May 3.5 Quarterly Project Report Draft Discussion: SSS overviewed the First Quarter Report, which will be distributed to Council as a Status/Activity Report. Action Items: 1) SSS to submit the report to each partner municipality via the clerk, requesting submission to Council with a motion to receive. 3.6 Memo to the SPSC (re: Walk for Water Event, August 2016) Discussion: SSS provided background for the submission of the memo to the SPSC, being that nt in August, 2016, with additional partners Wye Marsh Wildlife Centre and Beausoleil First Nation. Further information was made available in the memo enclosed. The SPSC requested further information on the role for SSS in this event, and recommended another meeting be held with Councillor Root, S. Farquharson and SSS prior to any commitment. SPSC APPROVEDMINUTES 5-MAY-2016 Sustainable Severn Sound (SSS) | 105 Fourth Street, P.O. Box 8, Midland, ON | L4R 4K6 | 705.526.1371 x.112 Page 414 of 491 14.c) Minutes of Sustainability Plan Steering Committee (SPS... Action Items: 2) SSS to attend a meeting with Councillor Root and S. Farquharson to further discuss the proposed event, and identify potential role and contributions by each participant. 3) SSS to update the SPSC at the next meeting (2-Jun-16) on the status of this request. 4.0 Budget Discussion: SSS provided the Financial Statements as of 31-Mar-2016, and 30-Apr-2016. Advising of a Bank Deposit error with the Asset amount, which has been identified; and will be corrected in the May statement. Financial Statement as of 31-Mar-2016 Financial Statement as of 30-Apr-2016 Action Items: 1) SSS to provide an updated and corrected Financial Statement at the 2-Jun-16 SPSC meeting. 5.0 June 2016 August 2016 Meeting Schedule Date Time Location Purpose Thursday, June 2, 2016 10am-12pm SSS Office, 105 Fourth - Discuss June 15 Speaker Event, Street, Midland - Discuss SSS participation with the Walk for Water Thursday, July 7, 2016 10am-12pm SSS Office, 105 Fourth Regular Meeting Street, Midland Thursday, August 4, 2016 10am-12pm SSS Office, 105 Fourth Regular Meeting Street, Midland SPSC APPROVEDMINUTES 5-MAY-2016 Sustainable Severn Sound (SSS) | 105 Fourth Street, P.O. Box 8, Midland, ON | L4R 4K6 | 705.526.1371 x.112 Page 415 of 491 14.c) Minutes of Sustainability Plan Steering Committee (SPS... 6.0 Information Sharing Discussion: SSS discussed the monthly Sustainability Bulletin (E-News), including the links below t the issues produced in 2016. May Theme: Waste and Recycling http://www.sustainablesevernsound.ca/index.php/blog/article/may-sustainability-bulletin-is-now- available April Theme: Green Building http://www.sustainablesevernsound.ca/index.php/blog/article/april-sustainability-bulletin-is-now- available March Theme: Energy Efficiency and Renewables http://www.sustainablesevernsound.ca/index.php/blog/article/march-sustainability-bulletin-now- available February Theme: Community Economic Development http://www.sustainablesevernsound.ca/index.php/blog/article/february-sustainability-bulletin- now-available January Theme: Climate Change http://www.sustainablesevernsound.ca/index.php/blog/article/january-2016-sustainability-bulletin- now-available Additional Information was shared, including the following: NSCFDC Working through introducing a green loan program, supporting small businesses in energy retrofits. NSCFDC is working with Midland PUC to develop a marketing piece with more information available in June or July. SSEA -going. A volunteer tree planting event took place at Tiffin Pond on Tuesday, May 3. Thursday, June 30, visit www.severnsound.ca for more information as it is available. SMDHU SMDHU has been completing key informant interviews regarding the public health role in regards to climate change to support initiative. The project will use projection scenarios with climate projection data, and use that information to determine the areas to focus on for local adaptation. Will be a tool for municipalities in helping them address their climate change planning. Town of Midland The Town will be considering some additional engagement activities around active transportation and walkability. The Town is also developing a Youth Committee, which is 7 Page SPSC APPROVEDMINUTES 5-MAY-2016 Sustainable Severn Sound (SSS) | 105 Fourth Street, P.O. Box 8, Midland, ON | L4R 4K6 | 705.526.1371 x.112 Page 416 of 491 14.c) Minutes of Sustainability Plan Steering Committee (SPS... currently advertising for members until 18-May-16: http://www.midland.ca/Shared%20Documents/Youth%20Committee.pdf Town of Penetanguishene Completing an official plan review, engaging with key community stakeholders and the North Simcoe municipalities. Further information is available at: http://www.penetanguishene.ca/en/business/official-plan.asp Township of Severn Severn is planning a new community recreation centre for the Township; to be sited in Westshore area. More information can be found by contacting Councillor Stevens, or the Township at http://www.townshipofsevern.com/ Township of Tay Tay has recently completed the draft of its Official Plan review, and has been hosting public engagement sessions with the community. Tay is also the lead organization now hosting the fundraising dinner for the Wye Marsh Wildlife Centre. That event is scheduled for 12-May-16 and will be held at the Oakwood Community Centre. Township of Tiny The Township is hosting a community Health and Wellness Day on June 4. Additional information is available at: http://www.tinyhealthandfitnessday.com/ The Township has been approached by the North Simcoe Anglers and Hunters to consider partnership on a Tree Heritage Park to possibly be located in the Township. More information on the proposal can be found by contacting NSAH at http://nsahcc.ca/index.html County of Simcoe Received funding to install three electric vehicle charging stations. More information can be found at: https://news.ontario.ca/mto/en/2016/04/funding-for-electric-vehicle-charging- stations.html Discussions have been happening around the diminishing participatio through the Green Bin program. Different options have been offered, such as clear bags, bi- weekly collection, or a non-sorting options which would see households pay $120 per year, with a processing facility being developed which could possibly result in 100% diversion. More information on the Waste Management Program, and the awarding winning recyclables diversion rate can be found here: http://www.simcoe.ca/CorporateCommunications/Pages/wdo-report-2016-04-25.aspx 7.0 Adjournment Time: 1:12pm Next Meeting When: Thursday, June 2, 2016 Time: 10am-12pm 8 Where: SSS Office Page SPSC APPROVEDMINUTES 5-MAY-2016 Sustainable Severn Sound (SSS) | 105 Fourth Street, P.O. Box 8, Midland, ON | L4R 4K6 | 705.526.1371 x.112 Page 417 of 491 14.d) Minutes of Barrie Public Library meetings held on Thur... Page 418 of 491 14.d) Minutes of Barrie Public Library meetings held on Thur... Page 419 of 491 14.d) Minutes of Barrie Public Library meetings held on Thur... Page 420 of 491 14.d) Minutes of Barrie Public Library meetings held on Thur... Page 421 of 491 14.d) Minutes of Barrie Public Library meetings held on Thur... Page 422 of 491 14.d) Minutes of Barrie Public Library meetings held on Thur... Page 423 of 491 14.d) Minutes of Barrie Public Library meetings held on Thur... Page 424 of 491 14.d) Minutes of Barrie Public Library meetings held on Thur... Page 425 of 491 14.e) Correspondence dated June 6, 2016 from Kathleen Wynne,... Page 426 of 491 14.e) Correspondence dated June 6, 2016 from Kathleen Wynne,... Page 427 of 491 14.e) Correspondence dated June 6, 2016 from Kathleen Wynne,... Page 428 of 491 14.f) Correspondence dated June 9, 2016 from Madeleine Meill... Page 429 of 491 14.f) Correspondence dated June 9, 2016 from Madeleine Meill... Page 430 of 491 15.a) Correspondence received June 13, 2016 from Simcoe Coun... Simcoe County FOOD & AGRICULTURE CHA RTER CHAMPION AWARDS The Simcoe County Federation of Agriculture invites its members and the public to attend its Annual Barbeque and 75th Anniversary Celebration Country Rock Barn Dance Thursday July 9, 2015 at 4 p.m. Thursday, July 7th at 4 p.m. Hosted by Featuring: Jim and Nancy Partridge, and Family Antique Car and Tractor Displays Partridge Family Farm The Simcoe County Food and 192 Line 4 North Agriculture Charter Champion Awards Oro Medonte, ON L0L 2L0 Presentation A Locally Sourced Dinner Mjwf!Cboe!Nvtjd The Martels Rock n Roll Show Tickets $25/person %23!Dijmesfo!voefs!23 Tickets may be purchased from 705-726-9300 Ext. 1224 connie@simcoecountyfa.org Visit fpa.simcoe.ca for more information Page 431 of 491 15.b) Correspondence dated June 14, 2016 from Lake Simcoe Re... Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 11:24 AM Subject: Lake Simcoe Clean-up Fund and Lake Simcoe/South-eastern Georgian Bay Clean- Up Fund Good morning Regional and Municipal Clerks: We would be pleased if you would share this email and its attachments with your Members of Council for consideration. At their meeting of May 27, 2016, LSRCA Board of Directors passed the following resolution: Moved by: A. Eek Seconded by: BOD-068-16 RESOLVED THAT Staff Report No. 19-16- -up Fund and Lake Simcoe/South-eastern Georgian Bay Clean-Up Fund programs be received; and FURTHER THAT the Chief Administrative Officer be directed to prepare a letter to the Federal Minister of Environment and Climate Change, along with a sample letter for use by member municipalities, requesting the continuation of funding for Lake Simcoe. CARRIED Accordingly, attached you will find LSRCA Staff Report No. 19-16- Federal Minister of the Environment and Climate Change, the Honourable Catherine McKenna, and a draft sample letter for use by member municipalities to request that the federal government continue to fund environmental clean-up efforts in the Lake Simcoe Watershed.The Lake Simcoe Clean Up Fund (LSCUF) and subsequently the Lake Simcoe/South-eastern Georgian Bay Clean Up Fund (LSGBCUF) have provided significant environmental, economic, and social benefits to the watershed; however, there is still much work to be done to restore Lake Simcoe and its watershed. To this end, LSRCA Board of Directors are asking for your support and request that you send a letter to the Federal Minister of the Environment and Climate Change requesting that funding to support clean-up efforts for Lake Simcoe be continued. Your mu If you have any concerns or questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. Thank you and best regards, Trish Trish Barnett Coordinator, BOD/CAO, Projects and Services Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority 120 Bayview Parkway, Newmarket, Ontario L3Y 3W3 905-895-1281, ext. 223 | 1-800-465-0437 | Page 432 of 491 15.b) Correspondence dated June 14, 2016 from Lake Simcoe Re... Staff Report No. 19-16-BOD Page No: 1 of 9 Agenda Item No: 3 BOD-05-16 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Phil Davies Manager, Forestry and Stewardship Ben Longstaff General Manager, Integrated Watershed Management DATE: May 13, 2016 SUBJECT: LSCUF/LSGBCUF Accomplishments RECOMMENDATION: THAT Staff Report No. 19-16-BOD regarding LSRCAs accomplishments under Environment Canadas Lake Simcoe Clean- up Fundand Lake Simcoe/South-eastern Georgian Bay Clean-Up Fundprogramsbe received; and FURTHER THAT the Chief Administrative Officer be directed to prepare a letter to the Minister of Environment and Climate Change requesting the continuation of funding for Lake Simcoe. Purpose of this Staff Report: The purpose of this Staff Report No. 19-16-BOD is to outline LSRCAs accomplishments through Environment Canadas Lake Simcoe Clean-Up Fund (2007-12) and Lake Simcoe/South-eastern Georgian Bay Clean-Up Fund (2013-17). Background: In January, 2013, the federal government announced the $29 million, five-year Lake Simcoe/South-eastern Georgian Bay Clean-Up Fund (LSGBCUF). This program extended their previous commitment to the watershed through the Lake Simcoe Clean-Up Fund (LSCUF) program.LSCUF launched in 2007 and committed $30M in funding over five years to improve water quality in Lake Simcoe. The new program, LSGBCUF, expanded that area of focus to also include the south-eastern shore of Georgian Bay and the Nottawasaga Valley subwatershed, with approximately one half Page 433 of 491 15.b) Correspondence dated June 14, 2016 from Lake Simcoe Re... Staff Report No. 19-16-BOD Page No: 2 of 9 Agenda Item No: 3 BOD-05-16 of the funding to be focused on Lake Simcoe and its watershed. According toEnvironment Canada (EC) the five-year $29 million fund aims to restore the ecological health of Lake Simcoe and South-eastern Georgian Bay and improve water quality for the residents and wildlife of the region. Funding through LSGBCUF was assigned in 4 rounds, with applicationsprepared and submitted to EC once peryear.Projects approved through Rounds 1 to 3 are complete orin progress, with Round 4 applications pending approval by Environment Canada. LSCUF (2007-12) LSRCA completed a total of 66 projects in the watershed through the LSCUF program, including 50 environmental restoration projects and 16 science and research projects. At a total project cost of approximately $12M, LSRCA received approximately $5.8M from LSCUF towards the completion of these initiatives. The balance was leveraged through various external partnerships. The following is a list of some of the accomplishments/outcomes realized by LSRCA through the completed LSCUF projects: 26,000 trees planted 10.5km of stream restored/protected Approximately 200 kilograms of phosphorus reduced Approximately 200 septic systems repairedor replaced Implemented large-scale restoration projects along the East Holland River at Highland Gate Golf Course, Aurora; Fairy Lake, Newmarket; Southlake Regional Health Centre, Newmarket; and Eastern Creek, Newmarket Retrofitted stormwater management ponds using innovative technologies at George Richardson Park, Newmarket, and Holland River Boulevard, Holland Landing Drafted Stewardship implementation Plans for Scanlon Creek in Bradford West Gwillimbury, and Ramara Creeks Established an on-going lake science program targeting environmental issues of concern Created first map of sediment phosphorus Completed first study of aquatic plants and environmental controls Completed lake-wide study of invasive mussels (zebra/quagga) and their impacts Intensive monitoring of water and sediment conditions in both Lake Simcoe and Holland River Used algae to identify high-nutrient tributaries Completedstudies of 98 stormwater ponds Created an Engineered Wetland stormwater management facility in the Town of Aurora and monitoredthe efficacy. Completed Phases 1 and 2 of the BMP Opportunity inventory surveying 1,652 km of stream length and identifying 17,125 potential BMP opportunities. Page 434 of 491 15.b) Correspondence dated June 14, 2016 from Lake Simcoe Re... Staff Report No. 19-16-BOD Page No: 3 of 9 Agenda Item No: 3 BOD-05-16 LSGBCUF (2013-17) Through Rounds 1 to 3of the LSGBCUF program, LSRCA secured funding to support a series of restoration projectsand research studiesacross the watershed. Building on municipal investments in the LEAP program, support from the Lake Simcoe Conservation Foundation, and investments by landownersand other partners, support was confirmed for the following projects: LSGBCUF Round 1-3 agreements LSGBCUF Total Project Overview Funds Estimated Granted Project Value CNSRVS Building on the LEAP program, supports increased Round 1: incentive funding grants to landowners watershed- Multi-year wide for restoration projects. Focuses on surface (2013-17) water quality improvements that contribute to $2.4M $12.4M reducing phosphorus inputs and improved cold Ongoing water fish habitat in the lake Maskinonge River Focused on community engagement and in-the- Recovery Project: 2 ground project work, continues investment in MRRP Round 1: Phase 1 by EC and other partners. MRRP:2 promotes Multi-year the development and implementation of restoration $280k $468k (2013-17) projects to improve this stressed subwatershed Ongoing Oro-Medonte Building on the success of the first LSCUF program, BMPs Project the LSGBCUF funding supports implementation of Round 1: restoration projects on farm and rural properties Multi-year that address water quality and streambank $345k $918k (2013-17) enhancements, and septic system upgrades Ongoing Ramara Creeks Building on the success of the first LSCUF program, BMP Project and informed by the new Oro Creeks Subwatershed Round 2: Management Strategy, funding for this project Multi-year supports implementation of restoration projects on (2014-17) farm and rural properties that address water quality $468k $1.06M and streambank enhancements, and septic system Ongoing upgrades. It also allows LSRCA to continue to focus on improved outreach and partnership building Page 435 of 491 15.b) Correspondence dated June 14, 2016 from Lake Simcoe Re... Staff Report No. 19-16-BOD Page No: 4 of 9 Agenda Item No: 3 BOD-05-16 LSGBCUF Round 1-3 agreements LSGBCUF Total Project Overview Funds Estimated Granted Project Value Scanlon Creek This project involved improving water and habitat Restoration Project quality by creating a bypass channel around the dam Rounds 1 & 2: located in Scanlon Creek CA. Incorporating a natural Single-year each channel design, bioengineering and habitat 2013/14 structures, the project was completed with $190k $470k investment by LSCF and other funders, as well as Complete community volunteer support. Over 16km of creek has been reconnected RainScaping The project will result in construction of eight and Retrofit Program design of one low impact development Round 2 demonstration projects to showcase the technology Multi-year (2014-that will reduce water pollution (especially 17) phosphorus), alleviate flooding, and reduce $332k $626k streambank erosion by controlling water quantity Ongoing and infiltrating water back into the ground. The project will also identify a list of future projects. Lake Simcoe Basin This project was the third and final phase of an BMP Opportunity inventory of watercourse throughout the watershed Inventory Phase to map and identify locations where stewardship III projects could be completed which would reduce Round 1 stream bank erosion and improve fish habitat. This $56,782 $110,698 Single year information has been used to inform stewardship (2014/15) planning, develop the Stewardship Priorities and Opportunities Tool, and to inform municipal Complete Streambank Erosion Control studies. Evaluation of the This project undertook a survey of invasive mussels invasive mussel in Lake Simcoe to quantify and assess the impacts of population in Lake a shift from a zebra dominant population to a Simcoe and quagga dominant population. Benefits of this potential for more project are an understanding of large ecological frequent harmful changes taking place in Lake Simcoe and across the algal blooms Great Lakes Region; in particular the replacement of $47,340 $136,096 (Round 3 an environmental engineering, keystone species Single year (zebra mussels), with a congener (quagga mussels) that has different physiological and ecological 2015/16) abilities, and may be related to an increased risk of Complete harmful algal blooms. Page 436 of 491 15.b) Correspondence dated June 14, 2016 from Lake Simcoe Re... Staff Report No. 19-16-BOD Page No: 5 of 9 Agenda Item No: 3 BOD-05-16 LSGBCUF Round 1-3 agreements LSGBCUF Total Project Overview Funds Estimated Granted Project Value Assessing The Talbot system is one of the largest tributaries phosphorus inputs entering Lake Simcoe, with estimated inputs to Lake to Lake Simcoe Simcoe accounting for 25% of the total tributary from the Talbot flow to the lake. It differs from other tributaries in River system that it is a managed system. This project sought to (Round 3 better understand the flow regime and nutrient $58,240 $92,967 Single year discharge of the Talbot River, in order to better 2015/16) quantify phosphorus load estimates and the impact this tributary has on Lake Simcoe, particularly during Complete the spring freshet, and the fall drawdown of supply lakes to the Trent-Severn Waterway. Evaluating The purpose of this project was to evaluate the oxygenation as a effectiveness of a low cost / low maintenance method of oxidation technology to prevent pond stratification alleviating and maintaining bottom water dissolved oxygen stratification and concentrations. If bottom water oxygen levels can phosphorus re-be maintained above 2 mg/l then phosphorus bound release in urban to sediment will remain trapped in the pond $26,600 $73,635 stormwater ponds sediments as was originally expected. If shown to be (Round 3 effective, this could present a solution to optimize Single year the phosphorus reduction of existing stormwater 2015/16) ponds in the Lake Simcoe watershed as well as informing stormwater management practices in Complete Ontario. Total Project Approvals LSGBCUF Projects led by LSRCA $4.20M $16.4M Rounds 1 - 3 Staff continue to develop and implement restoration projects that contribute to water quality and natural heritage improvements around the watershed. As a result of the work completed through these restoration initiatives to date, the following improvements have been realized across the watershed as of March 31, 2016: Page 437 of 491 15.b) Correspondence dated June 14, 2016 from Lake Simcoe Re... Staff Report No. 19-16-BOD Page No: 6 of 9 Agenda Item No: 3 BOD-05-16 Accomplishments to date Environmental Measure All LSRCA Projects Total # of environmental projects completed 297 kg of phosphorus reduction/year 374kg Number of septic systems upgraded142 Metres of streambank restored/buffered2,700m Tree, shrubs and live stakesplanted44,600 Hectares of planted area4ha Livestock restricted from a watercourse350 Metres of fencing installed to restrict livestock 3,800m Septic systems repaired/replaced 142 Stream restoration projects 32 Workshops hosted or attended 126 Area of Stormwater treated by LID 0.311ha In Round 4, LSRCA developed and submitted fourproposals. The outcome of the funding application is pending final review and approval by Environment Canada. LSGBCUF Round 4 proposals (pending response from Environment Canada) Total LSGBCUF Estimated Project Overview Funds Project Requested Value Low Impact Developed in partnership with the Town of development Newmarket, the application seeks funds to solution (Ray implement LID features that will keep roof runoff Twinney Recreation clean, infiltrate it on the site, and reduce and slow Complex, located stormwater discharge from the site to local creek $190k $468k within Western systems. The project will incorporate signage to Creek, Newmarket) showcase the work done, educate the community and demonstrate how stormwater improvements can positively affect a neighbouring creek. Stormwater Development of a database of stormwater management management facilities in the Lake Simcoe facility database watershed. If approved, this project would assist watershed municipalities improve their $155,539 $327,836 management of data respecting the location, ownership, and maintenance status of stormwater infrastructure. Page 438 of 491 15.b) Correspondence dated June 14, 2016 from Lake Simcoe Re... Staff Report No. 19-16-BOD Page No: 7 of 9 Agenda Item No: 3 BOD-05-16 LSGBCUF Round 4 proposals (pending response from Environment Canada) Total LSGBCUF Estimated Project Overview Funds Project Requested Value Assessing The intent of this project is to evaluate the Stormwater Pond response / vulnerability of selected facilities to Vulnerability to predicted climate change impacts such as increased Climate Change summer temperatures, increased number of 0 $145,418 $387,218 degree days in winter and increases in intense precipitation events. Designing a Citizen If funded this project will design, and make Science monitoring necessary recommendations, for the formation of a program to inform coordinated Citizen Science Program for Lake management and Simcoe and its watershed. Design of the Program engage the Lake will be based on experience of existing citizen $60k $107,644 Simcoe community science programs, an understanding of the citizens of Lake Simcoe, and the information needs of the environmental management community. Total Project $551k $1.29M proposed LSRCA staff also assisted local municipalities and organizations with the development and submission of their LSGBCUF Round 4 submissions. Staff provided technical advice and support to staff at Newmarket, Bradford, Barrie, King, Innisfil, Chippewas of Georgina Island First Nation and the Severn Sound Environmental Association, assisting with the development of applications for 9 projects. LSRCA has committed $415,000 toward those initiatives. Funding approvals are pending. Issues: The due date for submission of applications to Environment Canada for the final round of the fund was October 15, 2015. Projects in Round 4 were to commence on April 1, 2016, and be completed no later than March 31, 2017. Projects cannot proceed in advance of funding approvals. No project approvals or rejections have been received to date from Environment Canada. As a result, the completion of successful projects is in jeopardy as the time available for start-up and completion continues to shrink. The LSGBCUF program and the associated funding commitment from Environment Canada are set to expire on March 31, 2017. The investment of the federal government has been significant and has driven LSRCA, municipalities, community stakeholders and others to increase their level Page 439 of 491 15.b) Correspondence dated June 14, 2016 from Lake Simcoe Re... Staff Report No. 19-16-BOD Page No: 8 of 9 Agenda Item No: 3 BOD-05-16 of focus on restoring the health and quality of the lake. The end of the program represents a risk to the momentum that has been generated by the investment, which has included increased engagement amongst watershed stakeholders, more and larger projects being completed and improved awareness of the importance of a clean and healthy Lake Simcoe watershed. Relevance to Authority Policy: The Authoritys mission is to work with our community to protect and restore the Lake Simcoe watershed by leading research, policy and action. The investment by Environment Canada in restoration has helped to drive an increased level of activity in the watershed. During the years that LSCUF and LSGBCUF funding have been available, the average number of projects completed annually through the LEAP program has increased by approximately 20%, and we have been able to assist with the completion of a greater number of large-scale projects. Manure storage facility upgrades, stormwater management pond retrofits and natural channel restoration projects require significant investment by landowners. The ability to leverage base LEAP funding with LSGBCUF funds has allowed us to secure funds from other programs and offer incentives to landowners that are sufficient to encourage their action. The investments by EC have also assisted with completing important science and monitoring efforts that have informed our understanding of the watershed and provided direction for the development and implementation of restoration initiatives. Impact on Authority Finances: The impact of the LSCUF and LSGBCUF programs on Authority finances has been significant and positive. Through LSCUF (2007-12) and LSGBCUF to date (2013-15/16), over $10M has been invested in restoration, science and monitoring initiatives, contributing to the completion of over $28.4M in project work. Summary and Recommendations: The investment in the Lake Simcoe watershed by Environment Canada through LSCUF and LSGBCUF has resulted in measureable impacts. LSRCA has benefitted through direct funding of Authority restoration, science and monitoring programs, increases in our knowledge and understanding of watershed systems, and new and expanded relationships with watershed stakeholders and collaborators. The programs have been effective for advancing collective efforts toward restoration of the ecological health of Lake Simcoe and improving water quality for the residents and wildlife of the watershed. Encouraging Environment Canada to maintain and extend the investment in this important initiative will provide continued opportunity to capitalize on the awareness of the lake and momentum that has been generated within the community. Page 440 of 491 15.b) Correspondence dated June 14, 2016 from Lake Simcoe Re... Staff Report No. 19-16-BOD Page No: 9 of 9 Agenda Item No: 3 BOD-05-16 It is therefore RECOMMENDED THAT Staff Report No. 19-16-BOD regarding LSRCAs accomplishments under Environment Canadas Lake Simcoe Clean-up Fund and Lake Simcoe/South-eastern Georgian Bay Clean-Up Fund programs be received; and FURTHER THAT the Chief Administrative Officer be directed to prepare a letter to the Minister of Environment and Climate Change requesting the continuation of funding for Lake Simcoe. Pre-Submission Review: This Staff Report has been reviewed by the Chief Administrative Officer. Prepared by: Phil Davies, Manager, Forestry and Stewardship Ben Longstaff, General Manager, Integrated Watershed Management Original signed by: Original signed by: ___________________________________ __________________________________ Ben Longstaff Michael Walters General Manager, Chief Administrative Officer Integrated Watershed Management Page 441 of 491 15.b) Correspondence dated June 14, 2016 from Lake Simcoe Re... June 14, 2016 The Honourable Catherine McKenna Federal Minister of the Environment and Climate Change House of Commons Ottawa, ON K1A 0A6 Dear Minister McKenna: Re: Continuation of Funding to Support Clean-up Efforts for Lake Simcoe I am writing on behalf of the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority (LSRCA) to request that the federal government continue to fund environmental clean-up efforts in the Lake Simcoe watershed. Over the last eight years, the watershed has greatly benefited from the Lake Simcoe Clean-Up Fund (LSCUF) and the subsequent Lake Simcoe South/eastern Georgian Bay Clean-Up Fund (LSGBCUF). These programs have provided significant environmental, economic, and social benefits to the watershed. To date, LSRCA has completed 339 capital and 24 applied research projects, all designed to improve the health and quality of Lake Simcoe and its tributaries. Some benefits include: planting more than 70,000 trees, restoring more than 13 kilometres of streambank, and reducing more than half a tonne of total phosphorus loading to Lake Simcoe annually. The programs have helped raise public environmental awareness and inform the creation of new policy and educational programs to protect Lake Simcoe and its watershed for future generations. In addition to environmental benefits, the federal investment has helped stimulate local economy. For every federal government dollar invested, an additional two dollars was raised in return from partners and stakeholders to undertake works throughout the watershed. While this list of accomplishments is great, much more work needs to be done to restore Lake Simcoe and its watershed to ensure that it is healthy for generations to come. To this end, I respectfully request that the federal government continue funding to support clean-up efforts for Lake Simcoe. Page 442 of 491 15.b) Correspondence dated June 14, 2016 from Lake Simcoe Re... Page 2 of 2 This request comes following a meeting held with you in Ottawa on February 25, 2016, where this topic was addressed by a number of Lake Simcoe watershed mayors from York Region; namely, Mayor Justin Altman of Whitchurch-Stouffville, Mayor Virginia Hackson of East Gwillimbury, Mayor Margaret Quirk of Georgina, Mayor Tony Van Bynen of Newmarket, and myself, Mayor of Aurora. Yours sincerely, Mayor Geoffrey Dawe Chair cc: Lake Simcoe Watershed MPs Member Municipalities Page 443 of 491 15.b) Correspondence dated June 14, 2016 from Lake Simcoe Re... <Municipality Letterhead> June 9, 2016 The Honourable Catherine McKenna Federal Minister of the Environment and Climate Change House of Commons Ottawa, ON K1A 0A6 Dear Minister McKenna: I am writing on behalf of the <enter municipality name here> to request that the federal government continue to fund environmental clean-up efforts in the Lake Simcoe Watershed. Over the last eight years, the watershed has greatly benefited from the Lake Simcoe Clean-Up Fund (LSCUF) and the subsequent Lake Simcoe South/eastern Georgian Bay Clean-Up Fund (LSGBCUF). These programs have provided significant environmental, economic, and social benefits to the watershed. Working with the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority, a total of 339 capital and 24 applied research projects have been completed to improve the health and quality of Lake Simcoe and its tributaries. Some of the benefits include: planting more than 70,000 trees, restoring more than 13 kilometres of stream bank, and reducing more than half a tonne of total phosphorus from entering Lake Simcoe annually.These programs have helped to raise environmental awareness and inform the creation of new policy and educational programs to protect Lake Simcoe and its watershed for future generations. In addition to the environmental benefits, the federal investment has helped stimulate the local economy. For every dollar invested by the federal government, an additional two dollars was raised in return from partners and stakeholders to undertake works throughout the watershed. Unfortunately even with this list of accomplishments, much more work needs to be done to restore Lake Simcoe and its watershed. To this end, the <enter municipality>would request that the Federal Ministry of Environment and Climate Change continue to provide funding support for clean-up efforts within the Lake Simcoe watershed. Regards, <Mayor> Cc: local MPs Page 444 of 491 15.b) Correspondence dated June 14, 2016 from Lake Simcoe Re... Page 445 of 491 15.c) Correspondence dated June 16, 2016 from County of Simc... Good day Golfers! th It is time once again to dust off your golf clubs and get ready for the 12 Annual Warden_s Golf Tournament on September 1, 2016. We hope that the warmer weather finds everyone in a great mood for a fun day of golf at Blue Mountain Golf and Country Club in support of the Georgian Village Fundraising Campaign. Please place our tournament in your calendars, rally your team together and submit your completed registration and/or sponsorship forms before heading out for your summer vacations. You can access these forms by clicking on the poster below. Should you require assistance, please contact Margaret Thibideau at (705) 726- 9300 Ext. 1257 or Margaret.thibideau@simcoe.ca Thank you for your consideration. As always, we greatly appreciate your ongoing support of our fundraising events. st We look forward to seeing you on September 1! Page 446 of 491 15.c) Correspondence dated June 16, 2016 from County of Simc... Kpjo!Xbsefo!Hfssz!Nbstibmm!bu!uif UI 23!BOOVBM XBSEFO_T HPMG!UPVSOBNFOU Tfqufncfs!2-!3127 bu!Cmvf!Npvoubjo!Hpmg!boe!Dpvousz!Dmvc jo!tvqqpsu!pg!uif! Hfpshjbo!Wjmmbhf!Gvoesbjtjoh!Dbnqbjho %336!jodmveft!29!ipmft!pg!hpmg-!dbsu-! dpnqmjnfoubsz!dpoujofoubm!csfblgbtu-!mvodi-! ejoofs-!boe!b!hjgu!gspn!uif!Xbsefo/! 22!b/n/!tipuhvo!tubsu-!tdsbncmf!gpsnbu/! Dpouftut!xjmm!cf!ubljoh!qmbdf!po!dpvstf-! dmvc!ipvtf/ Up!jorvjsf!bcpvu!sfhjtusbujpo!boe! tqpotpstijq!pqqpsuvojujft-!dpoubdu; Nbshbsfu!Uijcjefbv-! 816.837.:411!fyu/!2368! ps!nbshbsfu/uijcjefbvAtjndpf/db +!qpsujpo!pg!uif!sfhjtusbujpo!gff!nbz!cf!fmjhjcmf!gps!b!uby!sfdfjqu/ Page 447 of 491 UI 15.c) Correspondence dated June 16, 2016 from County of Simc... 23!BOOVBM SFHJTUSBUJPO!GPSN Cmvf!Npvoubjo!Hpmg!boe!Dpvousz!Dmvc ui 817!21!Mjof-!Dpmmjohxppe-!Poubsjp XBSEFO_T 22!b/n/!Tipuhvo!tubsu HPMG!UPVSOBNFOU 2 -!3127 Tfqufncfs Cvtjoftt!Obnf; Dpoubdu!Obnf; Nbjmjoh!Beesftt; Qipof;Fnbjm; Dsfeju!Dbse!$;Wjtb0ND!!!!Fyqjsz; Obnf!pg!Dbseipmefs!bt!tipxo!po!Dbse Difrvf!fodmptfe;!! Xf!xpvme!mjlf!up!qbsujdjqbuf!bt!)efubjmt!po!sfwfstf;* Hpme!tqpotps!.!%3-611Tjmwfs!tqpotps.!%2-611Cspo{f!tqpotps!.!%2-111 Ipmf.jo.Pof!tqpotps!.!%861Mpohftu!Esjwf!tqpotps.!%611Dmptfu!up!uif!Qjo!tqpotps!.! %611 Ipmf!tqpotps!.!%311Dbsu!tqpotps.!%211Qsj{f!tqpotps!)jufn!ps!dbti* Dbti!epobujpoJoejwjevbm!.!%336+Gpvstpnf!.!%:11+ Ejoofs!boe!Tjmfou!Bvdujpo!.!%61+ Qbsujdjqbou)t*!Obnf)t*; Obnf;Beesftt;Qipof!$;Fnbjm; Sfhjtusbujpo!efbemjof!jt!Bvhvtu!37-!3127/Qmfbtf!nblf!difrvft!qbzbcmf!up;!! Dpvouz!pg!Tjndpf Gps!npsf!jogpsnbujpo-!ps!up!sfhjtufs-!qmfbtf!dpoubdu! Nbshbsfu!Uijcjefbv-!Fyfdvujwf!Bttjtubou!up!uif!Xbsefo!boe!DBP-!Dpvouz!pg!Tjndpf 2221!Ijhixbz!37-!Njeivstu-!Poubsjp!!!M1M!2Y1!!!!Ufm;!816.837.:411!fyu/!2368!!!Gby;!816.836.2396! +!qpsujpo!pg!uif!sfhjtusbujpo!gff!nbz!cf!fmjhjcmf!gps!b!uby!sfdfjqu/ Qfstpobm!jogpsnbujpo!po!uijt!gpsn!jt!dpmmfdufe!voefs!uif!bvuipsjuz!pg!Tfdujpo!22!pg! ui uif!Nvojdjqbm!Bdu-!3112-!bt!bnfoefe-!boe!xjmm!cf!vtfe!gps!uif!23!Boovbm!Xbsefo_t! Hpmg!Upvsobnfou!sfhjtusbujpo-!qbznfou!boe!nbjmjoht/! Page 448 of 491 UI 15.c) Correspondence dated June 16, 2016 from County of Simc... 23!BOOVBM TQPOTPSTIJQ! XBSEFO_T PQQPSUVOJUJFT HPMG!UPVSOBNFOU Tfqufncfs!2-!3127 Tqpotpstijq!Tqpotpstijq! Wbmvf Mfwfm Dpsqpsbuf!mphp!ejtqmbzfe!joejwjevbmmz!bu!uxp!qsfnjvn-! Hpme!Tqpotps%3-611 xfctjuf Tqfdjbm!sfdphojujpo!bu!uif!ejoofs Dpnqmjnfoubsz!gpvstpnf Tjmwfs!Tqpotps%2-611 evsjoh!uif!upvsobnfou!boe!po!pvs!xfctjuf Tqfdjbm!sfdphojujpo!bu!uif!ejoofs Dpnqmjnfoubsz!uxptpnf Cspo{f!Tqpotps%2-111 mpdbujpo!evsjoh!uif!upvsobnfou!boe!po!pvs!xfctjuf Tqfdjbm!sfdphojujpo!bu!uif!ejoofs Dpsqpsbuf!mphp!ejtqmbzfe!bu!uif!Ipmf.jo.Pof!dpouftu!ipmf Ipmf.jo.Pof! %861!.! TqpotpsPof!bwbjmbcmf Tqfdjbm!sfdphojujpo!bu!uif!ejoofs Dpsqpsbuf!mphp!ejtqmbzfe!bu!uif!Mpohftu!Esjwf!dpouftu!ipmf Mpohftu!Esjwf!%611!.! TqpotpsUxp!bwbjmbcmf Tqfdjbm!sfdphojujpo!bu!uif!ejoofs Dpsqpsbuf!mphp!ejtqmbzfe!joejwjevbmmz!bu!uif!Dmptftu!up!uif! Dmptftu!up!uif!Qjo%611!.! Qjo!dpouftu!ipmf Uxp!bwbjmbcmf Dpsqpsbuf!mphp!po!fwfou!tjhobhf Ipmf!Tqpotps%311 Zpvs!obnf!ejtqmbzfe!po!pof!hpmg!dbsu!evsjoh!uif! Dbsu!Tqpotps%211 upvsobnfou Dbti!ps!qspevdu! Zpvs!dpnqboz!obnf!ps!mphp!ijhimjhiufe!xjui!uif!qsj{f! Qsj{f!Tqpotps epobujpot!gps!qsj{f!qspwjefe ubcmf +!sfhjtusbujpo!gff!jt!fmjhjcmf!gps!uby!sfdfjqu Gps!npsf!jogpsnbujpo!po!tqpotpstijq!pqqpsuvojujft-!qmfbtf!dpoubdu; 816.837.:411!fyu/!2368!ps!nbshbsfu/uijcjefbvAtjndpf/db Page 449 of 491 17.a) By-Law No. 2016-056: A By-law to Prohibit and Regulate... Nvojdjqbm!Bdu-!3112 Page 450 of 491 17.a) By-Law No. 2016-056: A By-law to Prohibit and Regulate... Gbsn!Sfhjtusbujpo!boe!Gbsn!Pshboj{bujpo!Gvoejoh!Bdu-! 2::4 Page 451 of 491 17.a) By-Law No. 2016-056: A By-law to Prohibit and Regulate... !Nvojdjqbm!Bdu-!3112 Nvojdjqbm!Bdu-!3112 Fowjsponfoubm!Qspufdujpo!Bdu Page 452 of 491 17.a) By-Law No. 2016-056: A By-law to Prohibit and Regulate... Qmboojoh!Bdu Dpotfswbujpo!Bvuipsjujft!Bdu Sfubjmfe! Cvtjoftt!Ipmjebzt!Bdu Page 453 of 491 17.a) By-Law No. 2016-056: A By-law to Prohibit and Regulate... Fowjsponfoubm!Qspufdujpo!Bdu Qvcmjd!Usbotqpsubujpo!boe!Ijhixbz! Jnqspwfnfou!Bdu Qmboojoh! Bdu Qmboojoh!Bdu Bhhsfhbuf!Sftpvsdft!Bdu Bhhsfhbuf!Sftpvsdft!Bdu Bhhsfhbuf!Sftpvsdft! Bdu! Qmboojoh!Bdu Bhhsfhbuf!Sftpvsdft!Bdu Page 454 of 491 17.a) By-Law No. 2016-056: A By-law to Prohibit and Regulate... Esbjobhf!BduUjmf! Esbjobhf!Bdu Fmfdusjdjuz!Bdu-!2::9 Cvjmejoh!Dpef!Bdu-! 2::3 Page 455 of 491 17.a) By-Law No. 2016-056: A By-law to Prohibit and Regulate... Page 456 of 491 17.a) By-Law No. 2016-056: A By-law to Prohibit and Regulate... Cvjmejoh!Dpef!Bdu-!2::3 Page 457 of 491 17.a) By-Law No. 2016-056: A By-law to Prohibit and Regulate... Page 458 of 491 17.a) By-Law No. 2016-056: A By-law to Prohibit and Regulate... Page 459 of 491 17.a) By-Law No. 2016-056: A By-law to Prohibit and Regulate... Page 460 of 491 17.a) By-Law No. 2016-056: A By-law to Prohibit and Regulate... Page 461 of 491 17.a) By-Law No. 2016-056: A By-law to Prohibit and Regulate... Page 462 of 491 17.a) By-Law No. 2016-056: A By-law to Prohibit and Regulate... Nvojdjqbm!Bdu-!3112 Nvojdjqbm!Bdu-!3112 . Page 463 of 491 17.a) By-Law No. 2016-056: A By-law to Prohibit and Regulate... Page 464 of 491 17.a) By-Law No. 2016-056: A By-law to Prohibit and Regulate... Page 465 of 491 17.a) By-Law No. 2016-056: A By-law to Prohibit and Regulate... Page 466 of 491 17.b) By-Law No. 2016-095: A By-Law to Amend By-Law, 2015-11... The Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte By-Law No. 2016-095 A By-Law to Amend By-Law, 2015-115-law of The Corporation of the Township of Oro- (Fees and Charges By-law) Whereas Part XII, Section 391(1) of the Nvojdjqbm!Bdu, 2001, S.O. 2001, c. 25, as amended, authorizes a municipality to impose fees or charges on persons, for services or activities provided or done by or on behalf of it; for costs payable by it for services or activities provided or done by or on behalf of any other municipality or local board; and for the use of its property including property under its control; th And Whereas Council of the Township of Oro-Medonte did, on the 25 day of June, 2015, enact By-law No. 2015-115 to provide for the imposition of fees or charges; And Whereas Council deems it necessary to amend Schedule D, Recreation of By-law No. 2015-115; Now Therefore the Council of the Township of Oro-Medonte hereby enacts as follows: 1. That Numbers 2, 5, 6, 7, 9, and 13 -law No. 2015-115 Recreation and Community Services be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 2. Ice Rentals 2016-2017 Season Prime Time $ 192.00/hour (4:00 p.m. to Close & Weekends & Holidays) Non-Prime Time $ 118.00/hour (before 4:00 p.m. Mon. to Fri.) Minor Sports - Prime Time $ 148.00/hour (4:00 p.m. to Close & Weekends & Holidays) Minor Sports - Non-Prime Time $ 118.00/hour (before 4:00 p.m. Mon. to Fri.) 5. Banquet Hall Rentals Rental 4 hour time period $165.00 Tournaments/Banquets $199.00/full day Party/Reception (including SOCAN) $443.00 + staffing expenses 6. Ball Diamond Rentals 2016 2017 Adult with Lights $34.00/hour $36.00/hour Adult without Lights $18.00/hour $19.00/hour Minor with Lights $28.00/hour $30.00/hour Minor without Lights $14.00/hour $15.00/hour 7. Pavilions 2016 Bayview Memorial Park $105.00 (Hydro accommodates up to 200 persons) Vasey $64.00 9. Facilities Old Town Hall Rental 4 hour minimum $120.00 $182.00/full day Arena Meeting Room3 hour minimum$38.00/hour 13. Horseshoe Valley Memorial Park Tennis Court Use - Public Time Allocation 20.00 (Annual Fee per Resident) Page 467 of 491 Page 1 of 2 17.b) By-Law No. 2016-095: A By-Law to Amend By-Law, 2015-11... 2. And That this by-law shall take effect on the final passing thereof. nd By-Law Read a First, Second and Third time, and Passed this 22 day of June, 2016. The Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte __________________________ Mayor, H.S. Hughes __________________________ Clerk, J. Douglas Irwin Page 468 of 491 Page 2 of 2 17.c) By-Law No. 2016-097: A By-law to Amend By-law No. 2011... The Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte By-law No. 2016-097 A By-law to Amend By-law No. 2011-177, Being a By-law to regulate, license and control canines within the Township of Oro-Medonte (Canine Control By-law) Whereas the Qspufdujpo!pg!Mjwftupdl!boe!Qpvmusz!gspn!Epht!Bdu, R.S.O. 1990, c. L.24, the Bojnbmt!gps!Sftfbsdi!Bdu, R.S.O. 1990, c. A.22, the Qpvoet!Bdu, R.S.O. c. P.17, the , R.S.O. 1990, c. D.16, the Ifbmui!Qspufdujpo!boe!Qspnpujpo! Bdu, R.S.O. 1990, c. H.7, contain provisions enabling municipalities to pass By-laws; And Whereas Section 11 of the Nvojdjqbm!Bdu-!3112-!S.O. 2001, c.25, as amended, defines spheres of jurisdiction under which a municipality may pass by-laws; And Whereas the spheres of jurisdiction include animals; And Whereas Section 103 of the Nvojdjqbm!Bdu-!3112-!S.O. 2001, c.25, as amended, states that if a municipality passes a by-law regulating or prohibiting with respect to the being at large or trespassing of animals, it may provide for, (a) the seizure and impounding of animals being at large or trespassing contrary to the by-law; and (b) the sale of impounded animals, (i) if they are not claimed within a reasonable time, (ii) if the expenses of the municipality respecting the impounding of the animals are not paid, or (iii) at such time and in such manner as is provided in the By-law; th And Whereas Council of the Township of Oro-Medonte did, on the 14 day of December 2011, enact By-law No. 2011-177 to regulate, license and control canines within the Township of Oro-Medonte; And Whereas Council deems it necessary to amend By-law No. 2011-177; Therefore the Council of the Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte hereby enacts as follows: 1. And that -law No. 2011-177 be amended by deleting Section 6.3 an replacing it with the following: 6.3 No dog shall be returned to the owner from the Pound unless a valid Canine issued by the Municipal Law Enforcement Officer. Township staff is authorized to amend the Canine Release Form as deemed appropriate. 2. -law No. 2011-177 be deleted and replaced with Schedule By-law No. 2011-177 Canine Release 3. This By-law shall come into force effect on July 1, 2016. nd By-law read a First, Second and Third time, and Passed this 22 day of June 2016. The Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte Mayor, H.S. Hughes Clerk, J. Douglas Irwin Page 469 of 491 17.c) By-Law No. 2016-097: A By-law to Amend By-law No. 2011... to By-law No. 2016-097 Schedule - By-law No. 2011-177 Canine Release Form The owner of a canine being held at the Pound has addressed all matters concerning the apprehension of the canine. The Township has no further reason to hold this canine and consents to its release. Current Tag #: Description of Canine: Date: Print Name: Municipal Law Enforcement Officer (MLEO) Number MLEO Signature: Page 470 of 491 17.d) By-Law No. 2016-098: A By-Law to Enter into an Agreeme... The Corporation of the Township Of Oro-Medonte By-law No. 2016-098 A By-Law to Enter into an Agreement with Heartland Kennels to Provide Pound Keeper Services and to Repeal By-Law No. 2011-082 Whereas pursuant to Section 11(3) of the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c.25, as amended, Council is empowered to pass by-laws respecting animals; And Whereas the Council of The Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte has enacted a By-Law to regulate, license and control canines within The Township of Oro- Medonte Control By-; And Whereas the Council of The Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte deems it expedient to provide for Pound Keeping Services under Agreement with Heartland Kennels; AND WHEREAS the Council of The Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte, at its May 18, 2016 meeting, declared by Motion No. C160518-13 the execution of the Pound Services Agreement between Heartland Kennels and the Township of Oro-Medonte. NOW THEREFORE be it resolved that the Council of The Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte enacts as follows: 1. That the Mayor and Clerk be authorized to execute the Agreement, attached -law; 2. That the said Agreement take effect July 1, 2016 and remain in force for a period of up to 5 years unless terminated in accordance with the provisions contained within. 3. That By-law No. 2011-082 is hereby repealed on July 1, 2016; 4. That this By-law come into full force and effect on its final passing thereof. th By-law read a First, Second and Third Time, and Passed this 25 day of June, 2016 The Corporation of the Township Of Oro-Medonte _______________________________ Mayor, H.S. Hughes _______________________________ Clerk, J. Douglas Irwin Page 471 of 491 17.d) By-Law No. 2016-098: A By-Law to Enter into an Agreeme... Page 472 of 491 17.d) By-Law No. 2016-098: A By-Law to Enter into an Agreeme... Page 473 of 491 17.d) By-Law No. 2016-098: A By-Law to Enter into an Agreeme... Page 474 of 491 17.d) By-Law No. 2016-098: A By-Law to Enter into an Agreeme... Page 475 of 491 17.d) By-Law No. 2016-098: A By-Law to Enter into an Agreeme... Page 476 of 491 17.d) By-Law No. 2016-098: A By-Law to Enter into an Agreeme... Page 477 of 491 17.e) By-Law No. 2016-100: A By-law to regulate Municipal Wa... The Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte By-law No. 2016-100 A By-law to regulate Municipal Water Systems within the Township of Oro- Medonte and to Repeal By-law No. 2009-082 (Municipal Water Supply) Whereas Section 11 of the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c.25, as amended, provides that a municipality may pass By-laws respecting matters related to water production, treatment, storage and distribution; And Whereas Section 79 of the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c.25, as amended, provides that if a municipality has the consent of an Owner or occupant to connect a public utility to a part of a building and other parts of the building belonging to different Owners, or are in possession of different occupants, the municipality may, at reasonable times, without consent, enter on their land and install, construct and maintain pipes, wires, equipment, machinery, and other works necessary to make the connection; And Whereas Section 80 of the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c.25, as amended, provides that a municipality may, at reasonable times, enter on land to which it supplies a public utility; And Whereas the Ontario Building Code and the Safe Drinking Water Act authorize the Township of Oro-Medonte to enact By-laws to protect the drinking water supply; And Whereas the Council of The Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte deems it desirable and necessary to pass a By-law to regulate the Municipal Water systems within the Township; Now Therefore the Council of the Township of Oro-Medonte hereby enacts as follows: 1. -law. 2. That this By-Municipal Water Supply By- 3. That By-law No. 2009-082 be hereby repealed in its entirety. 4. And that this By-law shall come into force and effect on the date of its final passing. nd By-law read a First, Second and Third time, and Passed this 22 day of June, 2016. The Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte Mayor, H.S. Hughes Clerk, J. Douglas Irwin Page 478 of 491 17.e) By-Law No. 2016-100: A By-law to regulate Municipal Wa... to By-law No. 2016-100 for the Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte 1.0 Definitions For the purpose of this By-law, the following definitions shall apply: Building shall mean a structure supplied with municipal water by the Township of Oro-Medonte. shall mean the Council of The Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte. shall mean any temporary, permanent or potential water connection that may allow backflow of contaminants, pollutants, infectious agents, other material or substance that will change the water quality in the water distribution system and includes without limitation, swivel or changeover devices, removable sections, jumper connections and bypass arrangements. shall mean the Director of Transportation and Environmental Services of the Township of Oro-Medonte and/or his designate. has the same meaning as in subsection 2(1) of the Safe Drinking Water Act. shall mean the use of water for any purpose outside the walls of any building located at a municipal address. shall mean an audit; physical, visual or other examination; survey; test; or inquiry. - shall mean those parts of the water distribution system that have been approved by the Operating Authority for the provision of potable water and in which potable water is available for use. shall mean all real property, including buildings or any part of any building and all structures, machinery and fixtures erected or placed upon, in, over, under or affixed to land and in the case of utility service providers and the Township, all buildings or any part of any building erected or placed upon, in, over, under or affixed to land but shall not include machinery whether fixed or not, nor the foundation on which it rests, works structures other than buildings, substructures, poles, towers, lines, nor any of the things exempted from taxation, nor to any easement or the right, use or occupation or other interest in land not owned by utility service providers or the Township. shall mean a connection to the water distribution system that is in-service and in which isolation of a part or portion of the water distribution system cannot be undertaken. shall mean the water supplied from a Municipal Water System. shall mean a lessee, tenant, Owner, the agent of a lessee, tenant or Owner, or any person in possession of a premise. shall mean the Township. shall mean those charges related to repairs, installations, services rendered, or other expenses, exclusive of charges included in water rates, frontage charges payable by the consumer as provided for in this By-law or as Directed by Council. shall mean any person, including a corporation, who is the registered owner of the property under consideration including a trustee in whom land is vested, a committee of the estate of a mentally incompetent person, an executor, and Page 479 of 491 17.e) By-Law No. 2016-100: A By-law to regulate Municipal Wa... administrator or a guardian. The obligations of the Owner under this By-law may not be transferred to a party which is not an Owner. shall mean a Municipal Law Enforcement Officer, Provincial Offences Officer, Police Officer, Engineering Inspector or any other duly appointed person. shall mean an individual, association, partnership, corporation, municipality, Provincial or Federal agency, or any agent or employee thereof. shall mean water that is fit for human consumption. shall mean a pipe installed from the water distribution system by the Township and for a specified temporary period of time; a pipe installed with the permission of the Operating Authority for construction purposes. shall mean The Corporation of the Township of Oro-Medonte. shall mean the part of the municipal drinking water system that is used in the distribution, storage or supply of water up to and including the water shut-off valve, and is not part of a treatment system. shall mean a device supplied by the Township to measure the quantity or rate of water flowing through a pipe that is used to supply a building. shall mean the portion of a water service pipe from the property line to the water meter location, or for a fire service to the inside of the exterior wall of a structure. - shall mean the valve on the water service owned and used by the Township to shut-off or turn on the water supply from the municipal distribution system. 2.0 General Provisions 2.1 This By-law shall apply to all Municipal Water Systems located within the geographical boundaries of the Township. 2.2 No person shall lay, or cause to be laid, any pipe or main to communicate with any pipe or main of the Municipal Water System, or in any way obtain or use the Municipal Water System without the consent of the Township. 2.3 No person or building or other place supplied with water from the Municipal Water System shall improperly waste water or, without the consent of the Director, lend, sell or dispose of water, give water away, permit water to be taken or carried away, use or apply water to the use or benefit of another, or to any use s own, or increase the supply of water. This shall include the furnishing of water form one building connected to the Municipal Water System, to another building. 2.4 The Township does not guarantee the continuous supply, quality, or pressure of water from the Municipal Water System. The Township is not liable for damage caused by the breaking of any services pipe or attachment, or for shutting off water to repair or to tap mains, if reasonable notice of the intention to shut-off the water is given. The Township is not liable for damage caused by emergency water main breaks or service breaks or attachments for shutting water off to repair an emergency situation. No notice of intention to shut water off is required during emergency repair activities. 2.5 In the case of an emergency, which may impair the supply or quality of water, the Director may shut-off the Municipal Water Supply and take such remedial action as may be necessary. Such remedial action may include limiting or stopping the supply of water in any area or restricting the use of water for any specific purpose. Page 480 of 491 17.e) By-Law No. 2016-100: A By-law to regulate Municipal Wa... 3.0 Establishing or Altering a Water Service 3.1 Every new residence constructed on a property located within a Municipal Water System shall be connected. An application for connection to the Municipal Water System shall be filed prior to the issuance of a building permit and shall be accompanied by the connection fee as set out in the Fees and Charges By-law, as amended. 3.2 The Township reserves the right to refuse any application for connection to the Municipal Water System if the existing system is at capacity, or where excess capacity has been allocated to other properties within the Municipal Water System. 3.3 Every building connected, or to be connected, to the Municipal Water System shall install the connection, as per the Township Engineering Standards. 3.4 The Owner shall notify the Township prior to the installation, repair, renewal, removal, plugging, capping or disconnection of a water service. 3.5 The Owner shall submit the appropriate forms, required drawings and supporting information and pay the stipulated fees or charges to the satisfaction of the Township. The Operating Authority may impose any condition that is deemed advisable and appropriate to ensure the integrity and safety of the water distribution system and the provision of potable water. Any conditions imposed will be identified in writing and said conditions shall be complied with. The installation or disconnection shall not commence until all required information and payments have been received. 3.6 Extensions of and connections to the Municipal Water System shall only be permitted where they conform to Official Plans. 3.7 New water service connections and water service installations made in association with Township capital works shall be subject to all requirements of this By-law and fees and charges set out in applicable By-laws. 3.8 As part of a watermain rehabilitation project the Township shall renew water service stubs on public property at its expense and to its specifications when: Piping is deemed by the Operating Authority to be beyond repair The existing pipe material is lead and supplies a single detached residence The replacement public water service is the same diameter Replacement piping shall conform to Township Engineering Standards. If the Owner requests a large size, the Owner shall pay the difference in material and labour costs. 3.9 All water service pipes connected to the Municipal Water System that require a live tap shall only be installed by the Operating Authority. 3.10 All water service pipes and appurtenances installed must be inspected by the Township. The Township shall be, at all times, entitled to enter any premises for the purpose of examining connections and fixtures which are used in connection with the Municipal Water System. 3.11 When an Owner temporarily discontinues the use of a water service, the Owner shall pay the charge as indicated in the Fees and Charges By-law for disconnecting the water meter from the water distribution system. 3.12 When an Owner permanently discontinues the use of a water service the water service pipe must be disconnected at the watermain, the watermain plugged or must be inspected by the Township and the Owner shall pay for such work and inspection. Page 481 of 491 17.e) By-Law No. 2016-100: A By-law to regulate Municipal Wa... 3.13 No Owner or occupant shall use or cause to be used any type of open loop water system as part of any heating, air conditioning or refrigeration equipment. No owner or occupant shall connect to any part of the water system any hydraulic motor, elevator or other type of appliance what operates in whole or in part using potable water. 4.0 Cross Connections/Backflow Prevention 4.1 No person shall connect, cause to be connected or allow to remain connected to the plumbing system within a building or water distribution system any piping, fixture, fitting container or appliance in a manner which under any circumstances may allow water, waste water, non-potable water or any other liquid, chemical or substance to enter the plumbing system within a building or water distribution system. The means for protection from contamination (i.e. cross connection control and/or backflow prevention devices) shall be in accordance with the requirements of the Ontario Building Code Act, 1992, as amended. 4.2 If a condition is found to exist which is contrary to Section 4.1 of this By-law, the Operating Authority shall carry out an inspection and shall issue an order to obtain compliance. If an order is not complied the Operating Authority may then shut-off the water service. 4.3 All backflow prevention devices shall be inspected and tested at the expense of the Owner, upon installation, and thereafter annually by approved personnel to ensure that the device is in good working condition. A record card shall be displayed on the cross connection control device on which the tester shall record the address, location, type, manufacturer, serial number and size of device, test me and license number. 4.4 If the results of the test referred to in Section 4.3 shows that the cross connection control is not in good working condition, the Owner shall provide written confirmation of the failure to the Township within 24 hours and make repairs or replace the device within four (4) days of the date of the test. 4.5 No personal shall without the prior written approval of the Township remove any cross connection control or backflow prevention devices installed as a requirement of provincial legislation or by order. 5.0 Inspection and Access to Property 5.1 The Operating Authority or any person designated by the Township may, at reasonable times enter onto any land on which the Township supplies drinking water for the following purposes: To install, inspect, repair, alter or disconnect the service pipe or wire, machinery, equipment and other works used to supply drinking water to the building or land; To inspect, install, repair, replace or alter a water meter; To determine if this By-law, an order, or condition to any permit is being complied with. 5.2 The Township may shut-off or reduce the supply of water to any building or land for the purpose of carrying out an installation, inspection, repair disconnection or any other work. If the Township has shut-off water or restricted supply the Township shall restore service as soon as practicable upon completion of the required work. 5.3 If an Owner discontinues the use of the water supply or the Township lawfully decides to cease the supplying of water to any building or land, the Township may enter the premise to shut-off the water, remove any property of the Township and/or determine whether the supply of water is being lawfully used. 5.4 All costs incurred by the Township to perform work required by this By-law shall be charged to the Owner of the property. Where such work is performed and unpaid, the amount outstanding shall be collected in the like manner as taxes. Page 482 of 491 17.e) By-Law No. 2016-100: A By-law to regulate Municipal Wa... Furthermore, the Township shall not be held responsible for the cost of any restoration. 6.0 Water Meters 6.1 Where applicable, water drawn from the water distribution systems, except water used for firefighting purposes, or water use authorized by the Operating Authority, shall pass through the water meter supplied by the Township for use upon such premises. 6.2 The placement of water meters is at the sole discretion of the Operating Authority. All water meters provided by the Township shall be installed to conform to Township specifications. The location of the water meter shall not be changed by any person except with the consent of the Operating Authority. 6.3 The Owner shall pay the water service charges as indicated in the Fees and Charges By-law, as amended. The water meter shall remain the exclusive property of the Township and may be removed or replaced as and when the Township sees fit. 6.4 Charges for all measured water consumption, as well as any work or services performed by the Operating Authority will be determined by the Operating Authority as indicated in the Fees and Charges By-law, as amended. Work performed on the water distribution system that requires an Owner or occupant to flush their plumbing system within the building to remove dirt or cloudiness shall not be exempt in part or whole from any measure water consumption and applicable rates and charges. 6.5 The Township and persons authorized by the Township shall be allowed access to the premises and be provided free and clear access to the water meter at all reasonable times for the purpose of reading. Where such access is not provided by the Owner within 14 days upon notification, the Township may, at its discretion shut-off the supply of water until such time as access to the meter is provided. 6.6 The Owner shall supply, install and be responsible for maintaining in good working order the inlet valve to the water meter, the outlet and bypass valve for all water meters and shall ensure that such valving is accessible. 6.7 Any leaks that develop at the water meter or its couplings must be reported immediately to the Operating Authority. The Township is not liable for damage caused by such leaks. 6.8 No person, other than persons authorized by the Operating Authority shall be permitted to open, tamper with the water meter or seals placed thereon, or do any manner of thing which may interfere with the proper registration of the quantity of water passing through such water meter. Should any person change, tamper or otherwise interfere, in any way whatsoever, with any water meter, the Operating Authority may shut-off the water from such building and the water shall not be turned on again without the express consent of the Operating Authority. 6.9 If, for any cause, any water meter is found to not be working properly, then the amount of water to be charge for shall be estimated on the average reading for previous periods when the water meter was working properly. 6.10 When the water meter is equipped with a remote read unit and a discrepancy occurs between the reading at the water meter and the reading on the remote device, the Township will consider the reading at the water meter to be correct 7.0 Operation and Maintenance of the Water Distribution System 7.1 The water service stub shall be maintained by the expense. All pipes, valves, fittings and other equipment between the watermain and the streetline shall remain the property of the Township. Page 483 of 491 17.e) By-Law No. 2016-100: A By-law to regulate Municipal Wa... 7.2 Any and all defects, including the breaking of a water service and meter pit shall be repaired by the Owner of the property being serviced. Should the Township become aware of any such defect, and upon written notice to the owner, the said defect is not repaired within seven (7) days of the date of the notification or within such times as the Operating Authority may deem necessary, then the Township may turn off the water supply to the property. 7.3 No person, other than persons authorized by the Operating Authority shall be permitted to operate the water shut-off valve to any premises. Furthermore, all water shut-off valves must be left clear and accessible at all times. 7.4 All water service to and including the water meter shall be properly protected from frost and any other damage at the expense and risk of the Owner of the property being serviced. The Owner shall be responsible for the water loss occasioned by a leak in the water service and the charge for such water loss shall paid by the Owner. The Township shall not be held responsible for any damages arising from such leak. 7.5 When any pre to shut-off the water supply from within the premises and to drain the piping therein. The Owner shall request that the Operating Authority have the water shut-off valve turned off to stop the water supply. The valve will be turned on indicated in the Fees and Charges By-law, as amended. 7.6 When any premises left vacant, unattended or without heat, where the water supply has not been shut-off, suffers damage to it and its contents from a leaking or burst water pipe, the Owner or Occupant shall have no claim against the Township. 7.7 any employee of the Township assists the Owner in the thawing of frozen pipes Owner shall have no claim against the Township by reason of such work. 7.8 The Township agrees to use reasonable diligence in providing a regular and uninterrupted supply and quality of water, but does not guarantee a constant service or the maintenance of unvaried pressure or quality or supply of water and is not liable for damages to the Owner or Occupant caused by the breaking of any water service pipe or attachment, or for the shutting off of water to repair or rehabilitate watermains or to tap watermains. Where planned work on the distribution system is contemplated the Operating Authority will make reasonable effort to provide notice to the lands affected of the intention to shut-off the water, save and except for emergency shut downs. 7.9 No person, other than those authorized by the Operating Authority shall open or close a water valve in the public water distribution system, or remove, tamper with or in any way interfere, break, damage, destroy, deface or tamper with any water shut-off valve, water meter, structure, watermain or water service in the water distribution system, nor tap off or make any connection to a watermain. 7.10 The Operating Authority shall be responsible for the operation and maintenance of all Municipal Water Systems, including required testing, servicing, and the removal of snow from around all hydrants, as deemed necessary. 8.0 External Use of Water 8.1 During the period from May 15 to September 15, the external use of water is permitted as follows: On even calendar dates for those municipal addresses ending with numbers 0, 2, 4, 6 & 8 On odd calendar dates for those municipal addresses ending with numbers 1, 3, 5, 7 & 9 Page 484 of 491 17.e) By-Law No. 2016-100: A By-law to regulate Municipal Wa... Only between the hours of 7:00 pm and 11:00 pm on the day permitted for the external use of water 8.2 The Operating Authority, in its absolute discretion, is authorized to impose at any time any other water use regulation which it deems advisable to further limit the external use of water. The authority shall include, but is not limited to, the right to further limit the hours of external water use on permitted days and to ban completely the external use of water at any time. Notice of additional water use regulation shall be given by the Operating Authority by publishing in local media or the Internet. 8.3 Exemptions to Section 8.1 may be considered at the sole discretion of the Director for new sod, grass seed or hydro seeded areas for a maximum fourteen (14) consecutive days. 9.0 Fire Hydrants 9.1 No person, except for Township personnel, or volunteer firefighters authorized by the Township Fire Chief, or those authorized under the Safe Drinking Water Act, 2002, are permitted to operate a fire hydrant. 9.2 No person shall paint fire hydrants or tamper with the colour scheme of fire hydrants except with the permission of the Operating Authority. 9.3 No person shall obstruct the free access to any fire hydrant or plant or place, or cause or permit to be planted or placed, vegetation or other objects within a 4 meter corridor between the hydrant and the curb or roadway shoulder nor within a 1.5 metre radius beside or behind a hydrant except with the prior written authorization of the Operating Authority. 9.4 Except for water used for firefighting and those operations authorized by the Operating Authority, any use of Township fire hydrants for water supply is prohibited. 10.0 Prohibitions 10.1 No person shall contravene any provision of this By-law or any order or notice issued pursuant to this By-law. 10.2 No person shall let off or discharge water so that the water runs waste or useless out of the works. 10.3 No person shall improperly waste the water or, without the consent of the Township, lend, sell, or dispose of the water, give it away, permit it to be taken or carried away, use or apply it to the use or benefit of another, or to any use and benefit other than his own or increase the supply of water agreed for. 10.4 No person shall without lawful authority open or close any valve or hydrant, or obstruct the free access to any hydrant, stopcock, valve, chamber or pipe by placing on it any building material, rubbish or other obstruction. 10.5 No person shall alter any water meter placed upon any service pipe or connected therewith, within or without any building or other place, so as to lessen or alter the amount of water registered. 10.6 No person shall lay or cause to be laid any pipe or watermain to connect with any pipe or watermain of the water distribution system, or in any way obtain or use the water without the consent of the Township. 10.7 No person shall use or permit the use of water externally except in accordance with the regulations set out in this By-law or any other regulation imposed by the Operating Authority. Page 485 of 491 17.e) By-Law No. 2016-100: A By-law to regulate Municipal Wa... 11.0 Orders 11.1 If after inspection, an Officer is satisfied that a contravention of this By-law has occurred, the Officer shall notify the registered owner of the land of the pursuant to subsections 444(1) and 445(1) of the Nvojdjqbm!Bdu-!3112, as amended, at the same time and provide all occupants with a copy of the notice and such order shall contain: 11.1.1 the municipal address and the legal description of the land; 11.1.2 reasonable particulars of the contravention; 11.1.3 the period of time within which there must be compliance. 11.2 The Officer, by a written Notice of Contravention and/or an Order to Comply pursuant to subsections 444(1) and 445(1) of the Nvojdjqbm!Bdu-!3112, as amended, may require any person who has not complied with the provisions of this By-law, or where any authorization for works has been issued on mistaken, false or misleading information: 11.2.1 to cease all work; 11.2.2 to restore/repair any damages caused; 11.2.3 to do all work necessary to eliminate any hazards resulting from the work that has occurred. 11.2.4 to be responsible for all cost associated with the remedial work. In the event the cost to repair damages is not paid, the Township will apply the balance owing to the municipal tax roll. 12.0 Offences 12.1 Every person who hinders or obstructs, or attempts to hinder or obstruct, any Officer exercising a power or performing a duty pursuant to this By-law is guilty of an offence as provided in section 426 of the Municipal Act, 2001. 12.2 Every Person who contravenes the provisions of the By-law is guilty of an offence and liable upon conviction to a penalty as set out in the Provincial Offences Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.33, as amended. 12.3 The conviction of an offender upon the breach of any provisions of this By-law shall not operate as a bar to a prosecution against the same offender upon any continued or subsequent breach of any provision. Section 442 of the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c.25, as amended from time to time, shall further apply to any continued or repeated breach of this By-law. 13.0 Severability 13.1 If any court of competent jurisdiction finds that any of the provisions of this By- law are ultra vires the jurisdiction of Council, or are invalid for any reason, such provision shall be deemed to be severable and shall not invalidate any of the other provisions of the By-law, which shall remain in full force and effect. 14.0 Miscellaneous 14.1 If any provision of this By-law is inconsistent with the Municipal Act, the Safe Drinking Water Act, or any other Act, the provisions of the applicable Act shall prevail. 14.2 Where the context permits, words importing the singular also include more than one persons, parties or things of the same kind. Where the context permits, words importing the masculine gender also include female as well as male. Page 486 of 491 17.f) By-Law No. 2016-101: A By-law to Amend By-law No. 2015... Nvojdjqbm!Bdu-!3112-!T/P/!3112-!d/!36 Page 487 of 491 17.g) By-Law No. 2016-102: A By-law to Authorize the Executi... Nvojdjqbm!Bdu-!3112-!T/P/!3112 Page 488 of 491 17.g) By-Law No. 2016-102: A By-law to Authorize the Executi... Page 489 of 491 17.g) By-Law No. 2016-102: A By-law to Authorize the Executi... Page 490 of 491 19.a) By-Law No. 2016-094: Being a by-law to confirm the pro... Nvojdjqbm!Bdu-!3112-!T/P/!3112-!D/!36-!bt!bnfoefe! Page 491 of 491